{"meta":{"query_hash":"ef0ef91cce31","filters":{"venue":"EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CONFERENCE 2008; PROCEEDINGS"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ef0ef91cce31","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=EUROPEAN+TRANSPORT+CONFERENCE+2008%3B+PROCEEDINGS"},"results":[{"id":"W574326559","doi":"","title":"Tour-based mode choice modeling technique: US practices","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CONFERENCE 2008; PROCEEDINGS","topic":"Transportation Planning and Optimization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mode choice; Public transport; Transport engineering; Metropolitan area; Mode (computer interface); TRIPS architecture; Transit (satellite); Variety (cybernetics); Occupancy; Computer science; Engineering; Geography; Architectural engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07621110963871311,"score_gpt":0.3128648773865819,"score_spread":0.2366537677478688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W574326559","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010087418,0.00015795432,0.9790358,0.0003483418,0.000018646946,0.00007446583,0.00042898266,0.0007507368,0.009097588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16716601,0.0006663053,0.82065064,0.00012835585,0.000029929803,0.0004426993,0.00081801607,0.0005138248,0.009584243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984067,0.0010106452,0.00006986825,0.00024956343,0.00020557993,0.000057648813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971077,0.0018064051,0.00015176187,0.00052849954,0.00035695464,0.0000486673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004422987,0.00082352187,0.0005993582,0.0013341189,0.0007682581,0.001710405,0.0018101997,0.00074447825,0.008418417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008566381,0.0008562947,0.0015431385,0.0023414968,0.0006124796,0.002336187,0.0017347984,0.0016087805,0.0014987099],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013469835,0.0002361228,0.009542808,0.00023120138,0.00020865374,0.00022402417,0.00216345,0.2927189,0.0014809538,0.40921074,0.009159477,0.27468902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016189373,0.000059931856,0.0012164766,0.00010114568,0.00004308878,0.00013350058,0.00030992948,0.87368757,0.0010974669,0.09243672,0.030855546,0.000042417032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033102725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029600486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033102725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018661682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016157904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0658201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W619062645","doi":"","title":"Tax-free employer-provided benefits for public transport: background, history and 2008 status","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CONFERENCE 2008; PROCEEDINGS","topic":"Transportation Planning and Optimization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Legislation; Public transport; Transit (satellite); Business; Payroll; Tax incentive; Public economics; Cost–benefit analysis; Tax credit; Transport engineering; Economics; Political science; Engineering; Accounting","score_opus":0.0820022886667152,"score_gpt":0.251534898678235,"score_spread":0.16953261001151976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W619062645","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060995597,0.47515184,0.003920789,0.030615477,0.0027051521,0.00028085013,0.012602967,0.00028798627,0.41343936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25153008,0.5512722,0.004104332,0.003916142,0.002273177,0.00026774136,0.01370607,0.00010691551,0.17282335],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997546,0.000035215744,0.00002313603,0.000044292137,0.000090693065,0.000052076277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992167,0.00022767788,0.00016513366,0.000022986076,0.00028080004,0.00008680317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006489167,0.00029392436,0.00015968854,0.0038500144,0.00066791003,0.0016728194,0.00037833644,0.0008849545,0.012853379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010115139,0.00022548535,0.00017493672,0.0064261113,0.0004167431,0.0019932664,0.00074710755,0.0011545329,0.0029200853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001541027,0.00038872947,0.008286148,0.002551184,0.000010140213,0.00019134163,0.0007143753,0.00089253706,0.000764158,0.05115727,0.15142138,0.7834686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039909846,0.000065419816,0.01967842,0.0010773939,0.000009031978,0.00023239704,0.00031897414,0.00021586656,0.0003296133,0.00090379664,0.97715116,0.000014123613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012002667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009240343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012853379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021179516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023377447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04299885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W650291818","doi":"","title":"A new look at projected gradient method for equilibrium assignment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EUROPEAN TRANSPORT CONFERENCE 2008; PROCEEDINGS","topic":"Transportation Planning and Optimization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computation; Mathematical optimization; Flow network; Computer science; Assignment problem; Algorithm; Path (computing); Scale (ratio); Work (physics); Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.030576622645711954,"score_gpt":0.2936049994057261,"score_spread":0.2630283767600141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W650291818","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014122243,0.00009227279,0.99688053,0.000072306495,0.00004669785,0.000021886612,0.000012464315,0.0002196757,0.0012418581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061724074,0.00028398493,0.93273693,0.000105874715,0.00010447979,0.0001699835,0.000084310355,0.00029889788,0.0044915103],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940157,0.00023589966,0.000015382691,0.000072506424,0.00023646752,0.000038172875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961877,0.00016994876,0.000021814933,0.00005171255,0.000104981154,0.000032807395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008737385,0.00074773753,0.0008984546,0.0007378598,0.00044661414,0.0009585301,0.0013654538,0.0009966893,0.0062051993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002367146,0.00050886394,0.00066541845,0.00069210987,0.0009158049,0.0015484632,0.0011797891,0.0021160035,0.0017333786],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018695691,0.00016490961,0.000593586,0.00028717538,0.00010050935,0.00017452677,0.00019505803,0.48518544,0.0102146445,0.197931,0.0069760503,0.29799017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024033341,0.000054169057,0.00006858755,0.000013591859,0.0000049268533,0.000054444172,0.000011256769,0.97602296,0.0010878658,0.01692069,0.005723074,0.000014468899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003637108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002395665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062051993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004811922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010087346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02075845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}