{"meta":{"query_hash":"af8ab9f10c89","filters":{"venue":"Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/af8ab9f10c89","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Eastern+European+Journal+of+Transnational+Relations"},"results":[{"id":"W2885149026","doi":"10.15290/eejtr.2018.02.01.04","title":"Criminological reflections on the Golden Rule and urban stewardship for safety","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Operationalization; Context (archaeology); Political science; Environmental stewardship; Terrorism; Refugee; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Economic growth; Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental resource management; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.11073837615067968,"score_gpt":0.30549460882197516,"score_spread":0.1947562326712955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885149026","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074363925,0.008610339,0.01209178,0.5358829,0.0011521281,0.00003445747,0.00003370294,0.00002407527,0.3678067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97839063,0.001514408,0.000968868,0.011176751,0.00032671102,0.00002547129,0.000007794114,0.000019088196,0.0075701415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99286216,0.0039819344,0.00018547193,0.0006938784,0.0011359832,0.0011405675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940573,0.004019987,0.0005181074,0.00047295992,0.0004990436,0.00043266107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009357164,0.000411874,0.00042214815,0.0014757055,0.013892388,0.010775795,0.0018227379,0.0076658567,0.0038708968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008584771,0.00033292247,0.00048235658,0.0010661102,0.11649946,0.010058511,0.00911657,0.009586653,0.00032319757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021969497,0.0000051225497,0.00011097093,0.000008153043,8.5249155e-7,0.000044471948,0.009733495,0.000088105786,0.000017661314,0.987061,0.0018587909,0.0010691504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000116481215,0.000020600894,0.0012871746,0.00020762676,0.0000050492504,0.0001842888,0.047567893,0.00042068507,0.00026991754,0.7735898,0.17641348,0.000021926482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014701872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017282236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014701872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008565094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006185807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0621444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043136485","doi":"10.15290/eejtr.2020.04.01.08","title":"Differing Interpretations of Janusz Korczak’s Legacy in Schools that take Inspiration from His Work: A Study in Four Schools in the UK and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations","topic":"Diverse Education Studies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Disadvantage; Work (physics); Sociology; Section (typography); History; Psychology; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.057145067831404835,"score_gpt":0.27210305909798715,"score_spread":0.21495799126658233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043136485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97516596,0.0020042888,0.00021786183,0.006581472,0.00012947796,0.000039514878,0.000039877243,0.000007773813,0.015813695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99316156,0.0012697054,0.00014388283,0.0014045305,0.0000149275775,0.000015324496,0.000020858512,0.000032553125,0.0039367373],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99041194,0.0032858104,0.00029857515,0.00087273016,0.0026032866,0.0025276956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990589,0.0027796433,0.0012662185,0.0002887848,0.002685441,0.0023909032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066242893,0.0007220219,0.0012417069,0.0041680727,0.053422462,0.019515831,0.002945563,0.002775378,0.0030402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011717892,0.0010154123,0.0003942062,0.0049099396,0.03697556,0.006142722,0.008247951,0.0076378966,0.000439603],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009581648,0.000012029948,0.0033702631,0.000021759875,0.0000027443086,0.0005126247,0.9921549,0.00000795338,0.00008235761,0.0018665998,0.00076133345,0.0011978844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015337367,0.0000049272835,0.0039671874,0.000079551915,0.0000028751174,0.00011974808,0.9846444,0.00001030861,0.00004204567,0.00011047565,0.011003562,0.000013413124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8227306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92037976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1772694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05008805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044779997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3634159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391603047","doi":"10.15290/eejtr.2023.07.01.13","title":"Discovering the Best Criminology Program in Poland: Contemplation of the Month-long Sabbatical at the University of Białystok","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; Friendship; Closing (real estate); Criminology; Economic Justice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminal justice; Social science; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05340696015532463,"score_gpt":0.28159255574987185,"score_spread":0.2281855955945472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391603047","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07451536,0.015030115,0.003696125,0.8746705,0.025713079,0.00023723095,0.000060427552,0.00013466485,0.0059424452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7145201,0.0193794,0.020493688,0.20108995,0.008116324,0.00077892566,0.00012683729,0.00041247508,0.035082348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879497,0.0055218134,0.0004303539,0.0011318151,0.0016377389,0.003328565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628143,0.0015127262,0.0014744739,0.00054631784,0.0027963417,0.030855995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019388407,0.0008689475,0.0011504025,0.0012176023,0.021713853,0.013475532,0.0024849381,0.0061784266,0.003040089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018354503,0.00072137814,0.00071985775,0.0006562615,0.012099821,0.009354595,0.020739948,0.017903991,0.0015168829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008484129,0.0019769375,0.016463352,0.0019122928,0.00019645173,0.0064477776,0.17069557,0.0011225689,0.009173003,0.077152036,0.5439289,0.17008264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000840253,0.000645926,0.0144709265,0.0018092773,0.00003462661,0.0015467313,0.17505534,0.0007286414,0.0018464108,0.021653585,0.78194606,0.00017848873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039634597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009839788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021713853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008946999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033396658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10253692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126422526","doi":"10.15290/eejtr.2025.09.03.05","title":"The Dutch Perspective on the Enforcement of the EU Sanctions Against Russia: Legal Challenges, Case Law, and Institutional Practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Enforcement; Judicial review; Duty; Negotiation; Duty of care; Accountability; Legal doctrine","score_opus":0.03038521523046204,"score_gpt":0.24268161398393287,"score_spread":0.21229639875347084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126422526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20603257,0.024514943,0.020020645,0.100907765,0.0009808867,0.00007394345,0.00015013435,0.000041840533,0.64727736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646694,0.004874286,0.003750135,0.0060815145,0.00015842186,0.000052281957,0.000051888455,0.000040082105,0.020321887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840274,0.009339578,0.0008167408,0.001546592,0.0027981552,0.0014714955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99193066,0.005658359,0.0008754695,0.00050383224,0.0007232318,0.00030845325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012814969,0.00025842272,0.00041861366,0.0013919976,0.0055713565,0.01327387,0.0017057104,0.0060792016,0.0027850922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016721599,0.00034110915,0.0005115009,0.0019467905,0.015974682,0.005330658,0.004402936,0.003692307,0.0003272297],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006845779,0.00001652222,0.00088102923,0.00005530117,0.0000067496853,0.0008533603,0.012557672,0.00086872577,0.00019882589,0.97539854,0.0027509541,0.0064054294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003110025,0.000050066647,0.0049420064,0.0013760426,0.00003404559,0.00126434,0.046380073,0.0031436456,0.0013085889,0.29698956,0.6443761,0.0001044506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064856514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07438916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064856514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013792115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012104804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12895805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}