{"meta":{"query_hash":"f72fc2bac76e","filters":{"venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f72fc2bac76e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Ecclesiastical+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2001088505","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x1500006x","title":"Queen of Canada and Not of Babylon: The Constitutional Status of the Crown in Canada and Freedom of Religion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Appeal; Conscience; Political science; Citizenship; Statutory law; Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Politics","score_opus":0.015392069975549611,"score_gpt":0.2457909525076007,"score_spread":0.23039888253205107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001088505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20770414,0.010116648,0.001157259,0.07788403,0.00056038675,0.000077727935,0.0008404578,0.00005364417,0.70160574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9125518,0.0015353338,0.00048554098,0.012008251,0.00007205417,0.000030368285,0.00009061974,0.000027765771,0.07319838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945544,0.00048427662,0.000091655835,0.00041969225,0.0014493536,0.0030005397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679595,0.0007320715,0.00014558474,0.00013299556,0.0012076393,0.0009857545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022883061,0.00024048392,0.00039406834,0.0009595426,0.028496426,0.00920569,0.0018656229,0.004395541,0.0063139154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006256704,0.0004222025,0.00033712038,0.0012952868,0.01715301,0.001628262,0.0029148434,0.005446696,0.0003115183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047212576,0.000011062224,0.0044081453,0.00004475448,0.000016000797,0.00048528417,0.015590765,0.00017245975,0.00041533457,0.944798,0.027527915,0.006483034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009440008,0.00004974212,0.047898915,0.00074034446,0.00010757595,0.00029859907,0.039510425,0.00079808343,0.0012733806,0.08494473,0.8239599,0.00032390404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10339797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10339797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16946226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7502083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044882823","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000743","title":"The Ecclesiastical Common Law: A Quarter-century Retrospective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Liturgy; Constitution; Quarter (Canadian coin); Consistency (knowledge bases); Common law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03313965380810882,"score_gpt":0.29778595060976243,"score_spread":0.26464629680165364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044882823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12663835,0.40907443,0.0024674917,0.046268553,0.004507775,0.00006669382,0.00038047667,0.00004146571,0.4105547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6672964,0.24832323,0.0011983078,0.012127494,0.0030997645,0.000090868074,0.00031481683,0.00009208821,0.067456946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592245,0.0017227188,0.0003323292,0.00049923075,0.0010376927,0.0004856745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852785,0.010761773,0.0010856729,0.0007736308,0.0017400933,0.0003603921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065436,0.00030020534,0.00038682693,0.007295798,0.006134425,0.009243483,0.00082390604,0.0034928801,0.0043681203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016607314,0.0004913901,0.00022027448,0.008481814,0.021152878,0.008351283,0.0042963657,0.0054061953,0.0006998375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034295477,0.00005492206,0.0013736114,0.00033492033,0.000011437327,0.0006756846,0.036184028,0.0001481523,0.00012058983,0.8721653,0.03149404,0.05740305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023869711,0.000019527062,0.004324118,0.0011222672,0.0000063195353,0.00056047627,0.01044631,0.000063715575,0.00030736107,0.013653564,0.9694689,0.000024996392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0122946985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013392641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122946985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007243142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004255276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05255294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052277509","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x08001191","title":"And Then There Was One: Freedom of Religion in Canada – the Incredible Shrinking Concept","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Human rights; Conscience","score_opus":0.020007781718485,"score_gpt":0.24862103605150618,"score_spread":0.22861325433302118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052277509","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03997943,0.044126645,0.002661214,0.755639,0.004873963,0.00005345767,0.00081314874,0.000070779395,0.15178236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70926315,0.030935243,0.004993845,0.16886155,0.0014625546,0.000043196287,0.00047790524,0.00014072473,0.08382172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937443,0.0006128355,0.00011590202,0.00064510206,0.0032379879,0.0016439313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924198,0.0008032365,0.00026546675,0.0002723599,0.0032648034,0.002974408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033428387,0.00034700622,0.00045631285,0.0018576088,0.019004466,0.011829977,0.0022031688,0.005143079,0.008698962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007638793,0.00027125987,0.000528321,0.0032908297,0.024013812,0.005557264,0.004171421,0.009134636,0.00044406572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000811016,0.000034483302,0.0062852176,0.00018618275,0.000033356733,0.0005153185,0.010547091,0.0003738837,0.00048061446,0.7246236,0.1799597,0.07687945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027331853,0.000028055518,0.013891836,0.00045151607,0.000028917566,0.00025449073,0.01037749,0.00047435935,0.00030615172,0.07011986,0.9038815,0.00015850666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9926082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99544805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15422925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15422925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22968633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054019724","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x07000476","title":"The Foundations of Medieval English Ecclesiastical History: Studies Presented to David Smith","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Classics; History; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.059591540746816996,"score_gpt":0.29172444632575256,"score_spread":0.23213290557893557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054019724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059166435,0.33347222,0.0009371787,0.1426912,0.0012947608,0.00002134327,0.00010535244,0.000025253714,0.46228623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74278927,0.158162,0.00047218177,0.0053549437,0.00182149,0.000038778486,0.000060687966,0.000030200283,0.09127039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999699,0.00016685379,0.0000069250377,0.000029682406,0.000051146075,0.000046411373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990305,0.0005488733,0.00007407909,0.00004832534,0.00014762684,0.00015064277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011626529,0.00029870763,0.00021325587,0.0012823072,0.0037191105,0.003999714,0.000455015,0.001141942,0.009710131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021816771,0.00023050717,0.00009280813,0.001390207,0.011108501,0.0051218914,0.0026410928,0.0016250993,0.00066759886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003485538,0.000043622815,0.0009278503,0.0002650362,0.000010010777,0.00037176657,0.10096748,0.00015593115,0.0002812023,0.7547001,0.10380341,0.03843876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000987809,0.00002292862,0.007814511,0.0011074179,0.00000769633,0.00025819457,0.05724281,0.000090442016,0.0002267584,0.08468827,0.8485174,0.000013513354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019809907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03318012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019809907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059050336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002679465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042844236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101827679","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x13000471","title":"Niqabs in Canadian Courts:<i>R v NS</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Subject (documents); Law; Test (biology); Trial court; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Questions and answers; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.015699070106776854,"score_gpt":0.2675490999569741,"score_spread":0.2518500298501973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101827679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1946021,0.008865215,0.0016461565,0.15039276,0.0016000245,0.00032962213,0.0010825658,0.00013291964,0.6413486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8416745,0.0036236783,0.0017244846,0.043912943,0.00024828804,0.000083601684,0.0002738048,0.00005707254,0.10840158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868253,0.001272734,0.0003628058,0.0011495596,0.0048423912,0.005547216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98899007,0.002160689,0.00042918976,0.00033498762,0.0060638697,0.0020211646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072304225,0.0005489151,0.00049203954,0.002444477,0.03533746,0.0100122085,0.0028895028,0.008778764,0.0085929725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019594107,0.0007841401,0.00077447644,0.0031564718,0.011123367,0.0022537657,0.0035230068,0.008112322,0.00061528775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013284125,0.00008503429,0.02108062,0.0003056624,0.00007477931,0.002505067,0.036900442,0.0007615772,0.0018350327,0.7144863,0.18723279,0.03459992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010810639,0.00011819624,0.0929043,0.00076979055,0.00023738279,0.0006788414,0.046614256,0.0023041414,0.0020136705,0.030839937,0.8229331,0.0004783596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99657464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99871075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17637813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17637813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24102297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9552846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106265496","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000068","title":"Judicial Restraint and Neutral Principles in Anglican Church Property Disputes: <i>Bentley v Diocese of New Westminster</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Synod; Statutory law; Political science; Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08927004415386,"score_gpt":0.30501881551784576,"score_spread":0.21574877136398576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106265496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16354309,0.0069407285,0.009679047,0.11581011,0.0010742482,0.0003180236,0.0002173841,0.00013464683,0.7022826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9220409,0.00086368225,0.0022470427,0.03304174,0.00041160206,0.00023871232,0.00005799902,0.00005156277,0.041046705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859512,0.0048964904,0.00079620164,0.0020033466,0.0031531043,0.0031996768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882306,0.0068221786,0.0005989746,0.0011296105,0.002199308,0.0010194456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014859991,0.00037956383,0.0007581926,0.001225121,0.021786684,0.024177127,0.0051308046,0.019510023,0.0037599977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024564099,0.0011037152,0.00047020544,0.001442048,0.03927722,0.0048204027,0.0052971365,0.017442567,0.0009215043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021561773,0.000019922429,0.0005913472,0.000024234185,0.000008377986,0.00040400596,0.01184387,0.00008888359,0.00034559393,0.9738607,0.010185173,0.0026062978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002481436,0.00008021207,0.0051267357,0.000899517,0.000120811026,0.0007300819,0.043271087,0.0017654165,0.0024155823,0.5176403,0.42739373,0.00030839557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42339548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54280883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42339548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023736134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037259895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8418621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125280111","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006219","title":"The Anglican Covenant Proposed by the Lambeth Commission","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Commission; Autonomy; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Term (time); Sociology; Theology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.012421256337278697,"score_gpt":0.2969896724442739,"score_spread":0.2845684161069952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125280111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18494521,0.01926068,0.017783025,0.13228251,0.007585705,0.0006404997,0.00016326162,0.00011682222,0.6372223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80407894,0.0019932035,0.011439528,0.029591884,0.0010267454,0.00041022978,0.0000800947,0.000043280103,0.1513361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881621,0.005445755,0.00069241377,0.0013555317,0.0025090831,0.0018351253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944127,0.0018582193,0.00043421565,0.00061049144,0.0018957151,0.0007885683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012290298,0.00041454405,0.0004387803,0.0010513013,0.013996373,0.013247452,0.0013226017,0.01245845,0.002390946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014376652,0.0005826653,0.00040019501,0.0008013205,0.0137542235,0.003254339,0.004881962,0.010962001,0.00052768737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016474567,0.000016473925,0.00050188636,0.000022688142,0.0000028697693,0.00013086827,0.0052420897,0.00010660347,0.00018833317,0.97969383,0.010564977,0.003512896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007197383,0.00014599541,0.0044177496,0.00076924596,0.000025150066,0.00043411614,0.012332064,0.00091868645,0.001056956,0.1341249,0.8455146,0.00018857227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031570964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04008922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031570964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00917624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017800262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06657857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125427894","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x10000074","title":"The Failure of Proportionality Tests to Protect Christian Minorities in Western Democracies: <i>Alberta</i><i>v</i><i>Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Taxis; Population; Law; History; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Demography","score_opus":0.0076301296110102106,"score_gpt":0.2514103856929762,"score_spread":0.243780256081966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125427894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7239648,0.0019554757,0.055328142,0.029025149,0.0011765993,0.00043466015,0.00091732224,0.00034271702,0.1868552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856409,0.000116509145,0.007089683,0.001303588,0.00014377975,0.00008480943,0.000109488006,0.000025692168,0.005485504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97331285,0.014448672,0.0007955994,0.002832638,0.0060696593,0.0025405083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8189395,0.14061561,0.008883444,0.01214356,0.015568457,0.003849395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06404162,0.00048416184,0.000866468,0.0023384253,0.0047419355,0.0030654692,0.0031157117,0.0017486154,0.007726682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1835952,0.00056873093,0.0007174303,0.0021143015,0.0093878,0.0039593205,0.0023154942,0.0043255384,0.000678632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018364985,0.00043121717,0.25314862,0.00034430422,0.00055811735,0.0008442963,0.01670541,0.0045060473,0.0020166019,0.3867416,0.038093694,0.2947736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008433439,0.0019663875,0.38827693,0.0010119008,0.0007428883,0.0017891038,0.027035546,0.07546896,0.016974388,0.3462145,0.13930911,0.00036696214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20377646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19716138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7962235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053225807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013215445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40518075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131691028","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x14000507","title":"Solemnisation of Same-sex Marriage and Religious Freedom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Economic freedom","score_opus":0.012431040881676373,"score_gpt":0.27459906697655434,"score_spread":0.262168026094878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131691028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27444607,0.001588438,0.003404412,0.017902263,0.0001965082,0.00007725631,0.00007506714,0.000021995884,0.70228803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784198,0.00036138284,0.0004768257,0.0013061665,0.000055046603,0.000025440708,0.000016063303,0.000006184456,0.019333174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963297,0.0010146654,0.00015382642,0.00032588167,0.0010545554,0.0011213177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713993,0.0009771864,0.00042458475,0.0004268335,0.00045573973,0.0005757136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032229144,0.00013330861,0.00037617446,0.00063091685,0.00824666,0.0042716833,0.0007180664,0.0027832256,0.0037350047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006071948,0.00028098948,0.0002933734,0.00045065698,0.037278872,0.002340364,0.005745644,0.004277715,0.0002887815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016156513,0.000019783634,0.002669304,0.00001925812,0.000003852623,0.00023863882,0.013733606,0.00008224155,0.00038653368,0.9767164,0.0008663176,0.0052478313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009434731,0.00022345589,0.0684877,0.00089495804,0.000055340446,0.0016248679,0.04773816,0.0012402507,0.0017708462,0.46054727,0.417158,0.00016486255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15134718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27155405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15134718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005992241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010537191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30093247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149054725","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000408","title":"Religion in the Public Forum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Impossibility; Relevance (law); Irrational number; Democracy; State (computer science); Human rights; Religious belief; Religious freedom; Margin of appreciation; Law; Political science; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Epistemology; Christianity; First amendment; Separation of church and state; Philosophy; Fundamental rights; Religious studies","score_opus":0.05067172917526061,"score_gpt":0.3004998651400729,"score_spread":0.24982813596481226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149054725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0284423,0.0054911007,0.0020704067,0.40915054,0.003206355,0.000026234664,0.00014143898,0.000100869736,0.5513708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85693914,0.0012223736,0.00042971002,0.032282654,0.0032117534,0.000039813185,0.00005967047,0.00005701349,0.10575784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966372,0.0017589635,0.000057571015,0.00021947092,0.0005042397,0.0008224969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956376,0.0021800708,0.0003686918,0.00038824516,0.0003460208,0.0010794341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005360758,0.00019571873,0.00023839506,0.00072183483,0.008486303,0.010138716,0.000688485,0.0081508,0.035635475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008572758,0.00019187885,0.00025064946,0.0005965016,0.008533952,0.008476266,0.005362528,0.0060071936,0.0024309647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000120866125,0.000051281586,0.00041767486,0.000025731884,0.0000028655481,0.00014144495,0.0045793103,0.000083039144,0.00013675416,0.9095174,0.072130606,0.01290176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019538918,0.000022743165,0.00087512296,0.00015927388,0.000004201469,0.000077527126,0.0050249845,0.00025025036,0.00012571803,0.19421388,0.7992117,0.000015053978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042007416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004918614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035635475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042309808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051799067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11921251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156426881","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x07000361","title":"Sacramental Sharing in Roman Catholic Canon Law: A Comparison of Approaches in Great Britain, Ireland and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Theology and Canon Law Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Canon law; Law; Canon; Political science; Classics; History; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.0421797874766863,"score_gpt":0.24711739302286012,"score_spread":0.20493760554617382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156426881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6549242,0.005021123,0.00052018353,0.0102269165,0.000079233876,0.0001116384,0.000104366925,0.000030247866,0.328982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98045176,0.0020517865,0.00034895906,0.0012569352,0.000007642112,0.000043436048,0.000053107622,0.000018201647,0.01576822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99172616,0.0014005204,0.00014717603,0.0004411445,0.0022604407,0.0040245946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951717,0.00084464875,0.00027785616,0.00019897481,0.0017729511,0.0017338505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030343148,0.00029300945,0.0006442174,0.0042221225,0.024447506,0.011237014,0.0025295743,0.0022496842,0.0037654175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00789796,0.00031880912,0.00032520478,0.008307949,0.015550457,0.0015513113,0.0064988304,0.0029774962,0.00022417642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002756338,0.00019200481,0.03791292,0.00038324902,0.00008767551,0.0019357089,0.40223598,0.0012673164,0.00082174555,0.42746472,0.019177562,0.10824543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070667666,0.00006332519,0.13527833,0.00068720063,0.000084955,0.00043216886,0.586295,0.0009711187,0.00047918558,0.00910035,0.26637453,0.00016314338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98845565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17153701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17153701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15009145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96089965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158089866","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x12000403","title":"What's Sincerity Got to Do with It? Freedom of Religion in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Plaintiff; Law; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Faith; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Democracy; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02053939208946261,"score_gpt":0.28723724704608883,"score_spread":0.26669785495662623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158089866","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10257973,0.018690005,0.0010191138,0.5977722,0.0027218205,0.00009233996,0.0009216559,0.00007681228,0.27612635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78049475,0.009513936,0.0014249817,0.124806516,0.0004623488,0.000037383386,0.00031011738,0.00007473899,0.08287513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993105,0.0004584194,0.00016553444,0.0006265737,0.002605068,0.003039354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99125797,0.0017877702,0.0002718831,0.00021728214,0.0034784146,0.0029866342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035803453,0.00031336717,0.0005720349,0.0012952423,0.02495633,0.013246891,0.0023310026,0.0063633686,0.0101574585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009473866,0.00040313476,0.0006910194,0.0019594717,0.013361628,0.0032312968,0.003227348,0.009610959,0.00043433125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006523664,0.000057221696,0.014153025,0.00021690932,0.0000768241,0.001275152,0.010883461,0.0006468877,0.00082474167,0.72321224,0.20722263,0.04136565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009208195,0.000057029643,0.03823819,0.0007710284,0.00010728328,0.0003406131,0.01866051,0.0012383196,0.000839807,0.057716645,0.8815211,0.00041731834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99677545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99845994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17528185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17528185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22615007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95655614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320468231","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006554","title":"Emerging Legal Issues Involving Islam in Europe","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Conversation; Political science; Subject (documents); Soviet union; Classics; Law; Theology; Humanities; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Library science","score_opus":0.01271117894001443,"score_gpt":0.29936639385805275,"score_spread":0.2866552149180383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320468231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33733484,0.07334371,0.0011885415,0.19264582,0.0026305013,0.00003499046,0.00013146517,0.00002125345,0.39266884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630516,0.0069003343,0.00033751733,0.016102113,0.0005413118,0.000012198836,0.000043381726,0.000009229986,0.013002317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956862,0.0013330061,0.00023209017,0.0004269119,0.0008140371,0.0015079262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977592,0.0012706878,0.00031713946,0.000117671305,0.00019176814,0.00034352555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034755855,0.0002064961,0.00037452648,0.0016378945,0.0067092795,0.0145508805,0.001179702,0.0108443,0.0041244463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005248943,0.00021737938,0.00035684984,0.002415804,0.013058187,0.004425087,0.005437457,0.004867969,0.00023049132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051017658,0.00003343778,0.0023890503,0.00009072046,0.000016992211,0.0031685245,0.015276097,0.00036987194,0.00028358866,0.9420545,0.018155297,0.018110937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000996681,0.000057937024,0.024886647,0.0012707417,0.000036644313,0.0030452851,0.0579015,0.00055450114,0.0005965348,0.19065963,0.72081256,0.000078339835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017077256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016204765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017077256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009442813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043957806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06851268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332931160","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x13000902","title":"Joint Assembly of the Anglican Church of Canada and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Synod; Convention; Context (archaeology); General assembly; Religious studies; Political science; Theology; Law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01756096524075337,"score_gpt":0.2477105737714764,"score_spread":0.23014960853072303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332931160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47848606,0.019866824,0.0020486882,0.0846258,0.0035648954,0.00044701973,0.002020877,0.00017211545,0.4087677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6458936,0.002780398,0.0015619798,0.0067499084,0.0001355337,0.0000618787,0.00039047498,0.00006338261,0.3423628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769247,0.00017132095,0.000035835594,0.00013837841,0.00077326235,0.0011887847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99486464,0.00035177672,0.00012669028,0.000098970224,0.0022511336,0.0023069002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021584088,0.0002285751,0.00028938786,0.0011228422,0.025428299,0.0040502483,0.0010697652,0.0014487327,0.007846239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003461997,0.00037852043,0.00018335957,0.0013040415,0.0032493595,0.0005271942,0.0023544233,0.0028591023,0.00041080176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019857004,0.00008183941,0.027704233,0.0003514293,0.00006109949,0.0017548389,0.07521823,0.000604603,0.0041074753,0.2467893,0.5313887,0.111739576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000099379195,0.000011345781,0.04024842,0.00015494473,0.000012912141,0.00010020981,0.026289286,0.00014229162,0.00051680347,0.0010307276,0.93142974,0.000053318614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065977514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065977514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21919444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4787026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336029995","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16000077","title":"‘A Delicate Exercise’: Balancing Freedom for and Freedom from Religion in Canada: <i>Loyola High School v Quebec (Attorney General)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Free Exercise Clause; Establishment Clause; Freedom of religion; Conscience; Political science; Sociology; Freedom of thought; Human rights; First amendment","score_opus":0.010136665900725423,"score_gpt":0.23830265824073227,"score_spread":0.22816599234000684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336029995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12797518,0.016075917,0.0020175704,0.40547368,0.0012202613,0.00021234891,0.0008860234,0.00010220581,0.4460369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7320382,0.0036735313,0.0016321645,0.16216376,0.0002473993,0.00012342655,0.00019810129,0.000064892956,0.099858515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915993,0.0010800658,0.00018692597,0.000677648,0.0022541266,0.0042019296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994962,0.0012102848,0.00024978246,0.00012025039,0.0018161484,0.0016415531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003369974,0.00043400226,0.0004607875,0.00118917,0.034209594,0.012129136,0.0035565053,0.012997066,0.005776398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075113205,0.0007163908,0.0007449612,0.0021179777,0.01302242,0.002729096,0.0030507718,0.011099904,0.00044836776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008428332,0.000056650042,0.014215211,0.0001501888,0.000056378998,0.0015232707,0.023027126,0.0005382745,0.0008960826,0.6972796,0.24611543,0.016057516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002512978,0.00008080248,0.0772512,0.0012030547,0.00023667232,0.0005856311,0.05449404,0.0022722222,0.0015242631,0.04745938,0.8140906,0.000550771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1451757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1451757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.210139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99147505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496097228","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00004592","title":"Illuminating the Law: Medieval Legal Manuscripts in Cambridge Collections, Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge edited by Susan L'Engle and Robert Gibbs, Harvey Miller Publications, Imprint of Brepols Publishers, London/Toronto, 2001, pp. 263 (pbk £30.00) ISBN 1-872501-53-2","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Classical Studies and Legal History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Art history; Media studies; Art; Classics; History; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.022692823489413625,"score_gpt":0.21611598651009575,"score_spread":0.19342316302068213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496097228","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022205997,0.7346127,0.0009060326,0.046293464,0.007938134,0.000040312723,0.00059959415,0.00022182088,0.2071674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04302996,0.4610849,0.003529998,0.006318851,0.010115589,0.000116679774,0.00075834413,0.0004756244,0.47456992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877244,0.00030354972,0.00008358436,0.00015220992,0.0005988954,0.00008930066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783915,0.0007105305,0.00024884136,0.00021835748,0.0004877417,0.0004954671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019322159,0.00093047693,0.00072313816,0.005351877,0.004214187,0.013575802,0.0015976933,0.0022675358,0.0977963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058672763,0.0009916669,0.00027334143,0.007500717,0.0074123084,0.00837204,0.0034921535,0.002465486,0.0187738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015678279,0.000010720809,0.00014667932,0.0005704611,0.0000062021068,0.00008970569,0.0057775,0.000040073824,0.0002844147,0.023383874,0.9011721,0.068502724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031123461,0.0000033584931,0.00095316663,0.0005848204,0.0000023948428,0.00011938644,0.0022204532,0.0000071536633,0.000046761324,0.0021147064,0.9939389,0.000005804373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034418896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10872107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0977963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008319853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005367154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3271612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563036451","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16001587","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Work (physics); Theology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Advertising; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.018217243934284498,"score_gpt":0.2709534100097946,"score_spread":0.25273616607551014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563036451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044537604,0.02180562,0.0008544555,0.061857373,0.014939343,0.00046215332,0.0068164915,0.00027650016,0.8484505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15549022,0.0073469556,0.00078251236,0.0123789245,0.0012338092,0.00012846572,0.0016369722,0.00022526705,0.8207769],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991172,0.00009021261,0.000023366401,0.00012912443,0.0003352422,0.00030485808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704033,0.0000772821,0.00006149602,0.00008410264,0.0013833315,0.0013534739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000978855,0.00029635185,0.0003392554,0.0010702386,0.013882358,0.0027960115,0.000724214,0.0012189518,0.06413947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015589374,0.00029272184,0.00012344788,0.0012803124,0.0011544852,0.0008401986,0.0020553537,0.0017327318,0.0051698275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005095813,0.000021760594,0.0019440756,0.00011413148,0.0000031781806,0.0002045097,0.0027073624,0.000034774195,0.0010069258,0.0098087555,0.95902085,0.025082836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029358284,0.000004419204,0.003691926,0.000054097865,7.650223e-7,0.00004716273,0.0022764532,0.000011214348,0.000075208365,0.000095505486,0.99373204,0.000008298773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8285544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9498385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17144561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020101137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032526527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34491056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607013338","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16000533","title":"How Relevant to the United Kingdom are the ‘Religious’ Cases of the US Supreme Court?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; CITES; Law; Constitution; Kingdom; Relevance (law); Political science","score_opus":0.040039398134655436,"score_gpt":0.29618333614820974,"score_spread":0.2561439380135543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607013338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16133298,0.056971893,0.0011739711,0.27929512,0.0034016634,0.000039736944,0.00036583495,0.00003562975,0.49738312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9446086,0.011769265,0.00024225784,0.03306253,0.00077848264,0.00001913863,0.00014277341,0.00003232687,0.009344756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886335,0.006897861,0.00051775767,0.0006913667,0.0014624778,0.0017970781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803002,0.010547816,0.0024832275,0.00077601714,0.0045030843,0.0013897287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062730764,0.0002578028,0.00045362744,0.002474542,0.0067599956,0.014955196,0.0010080563,0.0062852665,0.0063181953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042850323,0.00035827674,0.00044131477,0.0037643388,0.011432806,0.009805835,0.0028173553,0.0047322866,0.0016624343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021428127,0.0000715648,0.026860498,0.00079651724,0.00015884098,0.002992089,0.045925338,0.0005280968,0.00071993284,0.65585566,0.19143301,0.07444419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049108265,0.00007018031,0.108400345,0.0028602341,0.00016864657,0.0014620158,0.09901713,0.00040498498,0.00094021356,0.09904451,0.6874,0.00018273866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13628702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26794967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13628702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00911604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062097437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2709875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971640652","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x19000565","title":"<i>Oikonomia</i>, Divorce and Remarriage in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition Kevin Schembri Pontificio Istituto Orientale, Rome, Kanonika 23, 2017, 327 pp (hardback €35.00) ISBN: 978-88-97789-39-0","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Byzantine Studies and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University; Canon (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Remarriage; Religious studies; Theology; Sociology; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.025288651490823447,"score_gpt":0.21876372555240067,"score_spread":0.1934750740615772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971640652","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015570899,0.6967554,0.00031628134,0.052400272,0.003721213,0.0000145528675,0.000047158173,0.000016827727,0.23115742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33719972,0.4060347,0.0005270684,0.007702252,0.0028912812,0.000032524895,0.000083550796,0.000053532916,0.24547535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997205,0.00009338915,0.000018030394,0.000034230692,0.00007650917,0.00005737298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997838,0.000081094,0.00004490616,0.000015731226,0.000028786353,0.000045596193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053672533,0.00026063234,0.00022731737,0.00047928328,0.002170308,0.0036198432,0.00036005073,0.001004147,0.010974225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000693165,0.00015028026,0.00008260485,0.0016768514,0.0051449095,0.0028576588,0.0014438721,0.0017965826,0.0014770981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006848496,0.000047446832,0.0026373218,0.00071714184,0.000011524754,0.00051246927,0.036616307,0.00008529498,0.00053594937,0.4920365,0.33525488,0.13147669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007876994,0.000012854503,0.007511672,0.000906005,0.000005071704,0.00030543483,0.018376753,0.000020955253,0.00006981715,0.018953625,0.9538207,0.000009247492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022421528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051125318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022421528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032787605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023780887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04458207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998635348","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x19001868","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Theology; Political science; Law; Advertising; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.014206956771013272,"score_gpt":0.2652995725323078,"score_spread":0.25109261576129455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998635348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03853327,0.018448303,0.00075262197,0.0442043,0.0083205905,0.00022331087,0.0045172432,0.00025382332,0.8847465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09341771,0.0033326142,0.0003673384,0.0036537293,0.00034099518,0.000030326322,0.00062133453,0.00011551587,0.8981205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995178,0.0000476522,0.000010511324,0.00007664459,0.00017212763,0.0001751956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879116,0.000042706004,0.000030903473,0.00004128603,0.00056841027,0.00052553066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005115362,0.0002840515,0.0002671981,0.00075507996,0.013990939,0.002392895,0.0005463413,0.0009581512,0.0924645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010586578,0.00026408446,0.00010583985,0.00097524864,0.0010415855,0.0007379885,0.0015727924,0.0016600325,0.0068059615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039137616,0.000016596236,0.0023176898,0.00011055091,0.0000033702893,0.00028045944,0.003444968,0.000034496952,0.0007070004,0.014474977,0.9406553,0.03791532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015647045,0.0000029558078,0.0031958488,0.000040778927,6.4805334e-7,0.00004943591,0.002343447,0.0000113994,0.000056988083,0.00013061732,0.9941612,0.000005067796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8560366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96567744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017422058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025366016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30932456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225131920","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x22000242","title":"Institut de Taoïsme Fung Loy Kok c Ville de Montréal","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01527663489589245,"score_gpt":0.2537257874834631,"score_spread":0.23844915258757063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225131920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023883807,0.040389355,0.0032559352,0.016702652,0.0018130582,0.00010167401,0.004601786,0.0007232021,0.90852857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.110699736,0.00985074,0.0021128815,0.00043622465,0.00020013479,0.000054303502,0.00071187166,0.00020283215,0.8757313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989623,0.00017753484,0.000028459257,0.00019416222,0.00038890573,0.00024859598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886274,0.00031506366,0.00008044255,0.000106544365,0.0002742047,0.00036096261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078528724,0.0010258993,0.0007580818,0.001154764,0.00452843,0.0056534098,0.00077795074,0.0013375487,0.28096664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019523621,0.00036433383,0.0004541014,0.0014395124,0.0019982697,0.001787826,0.0016454103,0.0026353637,0.028754273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004884858,0.00013283492,0.008436632,0.0010083566,0.000116676994,0.0027529404,0.003399849,0.0012554778,0.006209983,0.42262614,0.29928845,0.25428417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030701503,0.000034833647,0.012672519,0.00024536654,0.000011633699,0.00052393303,0.0011459049,0.0003682833,0.0011663026,0.0049091023,0.9788551,0.000036370937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47685555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48943743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5231445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011184975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012495593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9481599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233277998","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x1400088x","title":"The All Party Parliamentary Group on International Freedom of Religion or Belief","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Hostility; Government (linguistics); Population; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Demography; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02045384112125888,"score_gpt":0.3015496449100306,"score_spread":0.28109580378877175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233277998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077130045,0.008193882,0.0012295155,0.06464446,0.010870997,0.00054194964,0.0093227625,0.0002300103,0.8972535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.091687836,0.0076604937,0.0031988951,0.03528871,0.0050078044,0.0015052477,0.0077702804,0.000307546,0.8475733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585414,0.00073986565,0.0002461084,0.00034208494,0.0015863054,0.0012315476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956832,0.0015078052,0.00038080878,0.00064566365,0.0009029958,0.00087953603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052209455,0.0006226639,0.0005991914,0.0014752721,0.0036686899,0.0063983835,0.0013718852,0.0055738906,0.03477479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011561953,0.00037148158,0.00042768568,0.0019935663,0.0018499056,0.0024735357,0.0033767424,0.005958018,0.009339041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085146436,0.00006393603,0.00171922,0.00021195806,0.000014293129,0.00014071583,0.0007044406,0.00007973087,0.00072665425,0.11149524,0.8267424,0.058016278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010791765,0.000016266633,0.006504206,0.00013714368,0.000005628663,0.000022374003,0.00023242341,0.00004091795,0.00024560772,0.003455745,0.9893156,0.000013299768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023374766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022453794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03477479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002472816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008694054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116333246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381281564","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x23000042","title":"Personnel Files, Confidentiality and the Right to Privacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Theology and Canon Law Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Duty; Reputation; Internet privacy; Dignity; Administration (probate law); Business; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.021508428926098458,"score_gpt":0.24122903873872892,"score_spread":0.21972060981263047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381281564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08262321,0.00827715,0.029959153,0.14971708,0.001054308,0.00016043868,0.00037872812,0.00007172935,0.72775817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9396845,0.003080034,0.0053357743,0.012088902,0.0007572068,0.00018458546,0.00010619765,0.00003449647,0.038728148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98309636,0.009686757,0.0007409979,0.0011033411,0.0034952697,0.0018772465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98223996,0.010049855,0.0019562594,0.003308367,0.0014930199,0.0009525548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012960067,0.00022016467,0.00033367108,0.00087832235,0.0063919537,0.0076616025,0.0010899361,0.0048113847,0.006386456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02449764,0.00034054118,0.00029439075,0.0011128479,0.022076024,0.008742743,0.005651684,0.004626746,0.0008068194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012417387,0.000009545088,0.00048509196,0.000030014608,0.0000027750198,0.00010546388,0.008410611,0.00008970145,0.00006748445,0.97993714,0.004135679,0.006714006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047832862,0.000087083914,0.002768449,0.00083647965,0.000018084424,0.0008330048,0.013287034,0.00051591056,0.00068379357,0.5979845,0.38287953,0.000058291615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007755629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059515685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012960067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029324356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008762601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068540156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396776965","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000127","title":"Re Holy Trinity and St Jude, Halifax","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04011560889809949,"score_gpt":0.25451207364144524,"score_spread":0.21439646474334575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396776965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021485977,0.03327263,0.00058794074,0.09595426,0.008903373,0.00007634656,0.00085203367,0.00013718326,0.8387302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045875352,0.0015204464,0.00018782419,0.0058110333,0.00015702461,0.000025038567,0.000087582914,0.000056965648,0.94627875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993481,0.000098998535,0.000020930855,0.00011452828,0.00015308603,0.00026433318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996902,0.000057300706,0.000023822062,0.000028410495,0.000082531435,0.00011769524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058137445,0.00060933427,0.00026062515,0.0005430536,0.00868021,0.0030378539,0.0005444286,0.002977145,0.061411865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014007917,0.00040882925,0.00019042731,0.00045418926,0.0032506895,0.0011901383,0.0020374234,0.0049707494,0.009417596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016173477,0.000026137768,0.0015342612,0.00012071513,0.000015341193,0.0016558608,0.0067368713,0.00015920257,0.0008356841,0.1710937,0.762228,0.05543247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009418158,0.0000064692463,0.002186337,0.000108440436,0.0000014932303,0.00012157558,0.0016271691,0.00001541197,0.0001347062,0.0023089028,0.99347275,0.00000724247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21798995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52555984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7820101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011311077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008745459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43344223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408170656","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000838","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014200758939490672,"score_gpt":0.284790262601031,"score_spread":0.27058950366154033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408170656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04345656,0.022916136,0.0005394729,0.028444663,0.0033936875,0.00020601183,0.013389201,0.00025435427,0.8873999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16745542,0.0069350717,0.00039799558,0.0034769485,0.00028668638,0.000047555808,0.0018018916,0.00016132969,0.8194371],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954295,0.00004253249,0.0000123126965,0.000066044944,0.0001429859,0.00019327937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992969,0.00004998773,0.000029620285,0.000032911474,0.0003495477,0.00024095376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038447126,0.00030020135,0.00029902393,0.0013771016,0.013911567,0.0024114503,0.00065363146,0.00087968336,0.083906844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009669247,0.0002369484,0.000106161584,0.002481193,0.0014026574,0.0008143593,0.0011624205,0.0011714714,0.0059292507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042570027,0.000015441476,0.003998415,0.00022603868,0.00000530051,0.00032495474,0.010945992,0.000043909033,0.0005093933,0.03863426,0.89800245,0.047251206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020155285,0.0000029550558,0.008017494,0.00009078506,0.0000015167592,0.000060419978,0.0051871655,0.0000123218015,0.00006911215,0.00025997302,0.98628926,0.000006957842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9625161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083906844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023921797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030202147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28069633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408170771","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000589","title":"VII: Edmund Wood (1841–1932)","year":2025,"lang":"la","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.02515036976331724,"score_gpt":0.3120235028224869,"score_spread":0.28687313305916967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408170771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009640665,0.144552,0.0010549569,0.03162115,0.020283798,0.000072213916,0.0017309354,0.00011921991,0.79092515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043014556,0.014425391,0.00029307045,0.0037469126,0.0024423515,0.000039653274,0.00026035617,0.00007167644,0.935706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997186,0.000060727303,0.000013525098,0.000069453825,0.00008552146,0.000052121453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99985933,0.000047102072,0.000020383019,0.000011196049,0.00004130154,0.000020633654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003274672,0.0005977514,0.00022327669,0.001655148,0.002578806,0.0014447015,0.00034252767,0.0013886457,0.037573513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010887707,0.00027894857,0.0001627344,0.0013984093,0.0012438637,0.0020475306,0.0011643864,0.001876507,0.013050005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004935996,0.000012726714,0.00041825807,0.00013863186,0.0000044835538,0.0004743527,0.0023631693,0.000086418346,0.00020771234,0.07785912,0.85464525,0.0637406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014040301,0.000004657308,0.00063618476,0.00010769786,9.856199e-7,0.0001283096,0.00020095853,0.000008193904,0.000086082975,0.0019343334,0.99688834,0.0000029819453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015303624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041637775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037573513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018800461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008602061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12569594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}