{"meta":{"query_hash":"f72fc2bac76e","filters":{"venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f72fc2bac76e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Ecclesiastical+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2001088505","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x1500006x","title":"Queen of Canada and Not of Babylon: The Constitutional Status of the Crown in Canada and Freedom of Religion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Appeal; Conscience; Political science; Citizenship; Statutory law; Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Politics","score_opus":0.015392069975549611,"score_gpt":0.2457909525076007,"score_spread":0.23039888253205107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001088505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95287734,0.00038083686,0.00023261907,0.002832106,0.00035057619,0.00011236503,0.0002816303,0.0000010627558,0.042931452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995545,0.000048512953,0.00017545879,0.00014606651,0.000054690638,3.4085585e-7,3.9823854e-7,0.0000015282975,0.00001850962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986104,0.00017152514,0.00035647847,0.000058775837,0.00059563975,0.00020723123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866045,0.0006041074,0.00020871147,0.00006827255,0.000249661,0.00020877969],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041570014,0.00005701305,0.0001895623,0.000013948259,0.00016590147,0.000006699871,0.00013729213,0.000029555658,0.000017559712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072250585,0.000035911133,0.000023599361,0.00010008611,0.0048944233,0.0000466181,0.00004255959,0.00015708822,2.157139e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037257945,0.000009470424,0.04541076,0.000008002347,0.000012079121,0.0000040637906,0.00019444432,0.00029381327,0.000017643373,0.9533121,0.00065346307,0.00004691486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040544877,0.00042422238,0.7210816,0.0009165616,0.0002915607,0.00032573222,0.017299997,0.0005154125,0.0023707016,0.042188115,0.20984092,0.0006906804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.911124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023064106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023128286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044882823","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000743","title":"The Ecclesiastical Common Law: A Quarter-century Retrospective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Liturgy; Constitution; Quarter (Canadian coin); Consistency (knowledge bases); Common law; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03313965380810882,"score_gpt":0.29778595060976243,"score_spread":0.26464629680165364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044882823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08741293,0.001526445,0.0017864736,0.0130354455,0.0036347343,0.00082971953,0.000024534607,0.00037854398,0.8913712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653727,0.00025572814,0.0010607422,0.0005418266,0.0014554332,0.000014225599,7.685358e-7,0.0000241479,0.00010983375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996065,0.0007776319,0.0005884304,0.00032740794,0.0011197133,0.0011217755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976333,0.0008952225,0.0001971354,0.00022841615,0.00035412895,0.00069184194],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014797755,0.00028473255,0.00040948746,0.000022160599,0.00835555,0.0005334724,0.00074107444,0.00022055193,0.00059854914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006866995,0.00017879314,0.00029208788,0.00020825383,0.0034262862,0.0004301943,0.0001540433,0.00117441,0.00031910796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010167278,0.00015812638,0.0013834074,0.0000026549599,0.00009496195,0.0000916051,0.013224342,5.880593e-7,0.00001328426,0.98173183,0.0016837659,0.0015137787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025734736,0.0012427699,0.21525367,0.00024139961,0.0004795839,0.00032558053,0.08925056,0.00018235287,0.00017713773,0.36874047,0.31980547,0.0017275275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049290583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016466279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9091244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005291432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007664572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052277509","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x08001191","title":"And Then There Was One: Freedom of Religion in Canada – the Incredible Shrinking Concept","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Human rights; Conscience","score_opus":0.020007781718485,"score_gpt":0.24862103605150618,"score_spread":0.22861325433302118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052277509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57841027,0.0014105573,0.00071292964,0.0064628534,0.00036129277,0.00014310733,0.00002244672,0.000011429649,0.41246513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854213,0.00024398313,0.00038978303,0.00044020606,0.00033422848,8.1796765e-7,4.5894205e-7,0.0000042130355,0.000044186865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878293,0.00020006047,0.00023751878,0.00007997081,0.0004314222,0.00026807818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894714,0.00066626037,0.00008714875,0.00006776603,0.0000759404,0.0001557609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033876387,0.00006659349,0.00015447025,0.000016643646,0.0007957958,0.000029198512,0.0001903379,0.000033533106,0.0001245086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021670647,0.000047712125,0.000029888155,0.00010305789,0.0018519755,0.000090710986,0.00003609903,0.0002929978,0.0000012705618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010368974,0.000012430669,0.009025769,0.000001500386,0.0000089807645,0.000051523944,0.00074469164,0.00014745253,0.0000055748014,0.98929864,0.0005665863,0.00012647464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035484163,0.00047873947,0.14759529,0.00089794584,0.00019829755,0.0020935424,0.043852687,0.001012171,0.00028428895,0.12363442,0.67496586,0.0014383538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9298017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8661064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86566424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015345203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029155435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6823681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054019724","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x07000476","title":"The Foundations of Medieval English Ecclesiastical History: Studies Presented to David Smith","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Classics; History; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.059591540746816996,"score_gpt":0.29172444632575256,"score_spread":0.23213290557893557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054019724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012649166,0.02019623,0.008149409,0.0059938002,0.02707839,0.00085561734,0.000083060535,0.00024343186,0.92475086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832865,0.00008160047,0.000911484,0.000974,0.008967965,0.000009827884,0.000005268835,0.000046871388,0.00571651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973763,0.00015486871,0.0008302418,0.00023749536,0.0008105817,0.00059047685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959571,0.0018854112,0.00019727112,0.00027669352,0.0011837765,0.000499785],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016954528,0.00023492114,0.0003969006,0.00013764268,0.0013430031,0.00016870405,0.00041135817,0.00007579807,0.0007044315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002317169,0.00015283433,0.00019497988,0.00006282696,0.0017899948,0.00024061181,0.00010033028,0.00070729246,0.000084754094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002881118,0.0001279083,0.000008849379,0.00003189647,0.00016064628,0.00005118999,0.03633239,0.000003123198,0.000045514345,0.87053025,0.0913133,0.0011067954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037342642,0.00033126966,0.00015956048,0.000111555506,0.00013256646,0.0000331523,0.0054721236,0.000020721483,0.00004623334,0.002897636,0.990237,0.00018477987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026180805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013950627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9706373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003686758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016157229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101827679","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x13000471","title":"Niqabs in Canadian Courts:<i>R v NS</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Subject (documents); Law; Test (biology); Trial court; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Questions and answers; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.015699070106776854,"score_gpt":0.2675490999569741,"score_spread":0.2518500298501973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101827679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06104563,0.00036162173,0.00013478256,0.023898536,0.00068024243,0.00016105766,0.0000051450234,0.000024943405,0.91368806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971834,0.00006897534,0.00016841237,0.0017121522,0.0007580018,0.000006606727,4.5659743e-7,0.0000044067833,0.00009757875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857086,0.00010408145,0.00021513549,0.00010797301,0.00035202992,0.0006499064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989425,0.00012787028,0.00003177573,0.00004401813,0.00013333897,0.0007204865],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044395382,0.00008102173,0.00013750339,0.00007216162,0.0014850997,0.00018573647,0.00018531585,0.000076674856,0.002171376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031332983,0.0000711436,0.000053057156,0.0001628192,0.00068856636,0.00026067698,0.000020748881,0.00031111576,0.0006765759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025629977,0.000022978908,0.006770579,4.832698e-7,0.0000080078735,0.00006769047,0.00046646403,0.000008523475,0.000005344544,0.9859367,0.004725818,0.0019848342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032251579,0.000037743845,0.07633701,0.000053871932,0.00001321381,0.000046060693,0.0026450236,0.00004220892,0.0000062297436,0.37371615,0.54652536,0.00025462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9048387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9531163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9361378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003292397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062394125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106265496","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000068","title":"Judicial Restraint and Neutral Principles in Anglican Church Property Disputes: <i>Bentley v Diocese of New Westminster</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Synod; Statutory law; Political science; Theology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08927004415386,"score_gpt":0.30501881551784576,"score_spread":0.21574877136398576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106265496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93851453,0.0002957788,0.00009442172,0.0023534414,0.00025776,0.00030289716,0.0000069452285,0.000031433003,0.058142807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691904,0.00017798861,0.0019361333,0.0001345454,0.00059995445,0.0000043006607,5.832613e-7,0.000012292201,0.00021516196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979843,0.00023771657,0.0005215192,0.00024172534,0.00045720808,0.0005575364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897677,0.00014664828,0.00016043463,0.00009333662,0.000110409805,0.00051239115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068453635,0.00017844007,0.00036318513,0.000044437944,0.0005968249,0.00008781142,0.000307903,0.00012811848,0.00017085293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005502304,0.00011201877,0.000096275464,0.00019393723,0.0013417532,0.0003264436,0.00012528662,0.00046547755,0.0000067341343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005767623,0.0009457007,0.09829318,0.00008400558,0.00016595167,0.00036718725,0.18240894,0.00002542317,0.0009212154,0.6818037,0.0010723843,0.033335544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022886836,0.00080656004,0.93713343,0.0005172228,0.00011293458,0.00007975361,0.021981418,0.000094054776,0.0005854672,0.01182605,0.023881339,0.0006930816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025139147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030138882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83884025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012816301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016056214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98755854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125280111","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006219","title":"The Anglican Covenant Proposed by the Lambeth Commission","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Commission; Autonomy; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Term (time); Sociology; Theology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.012421256337278697,"score_gpt":0.2969896724442739,"score_spread":0.2845684161069952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125280111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073259342,0.0010467363,0.004740687,0.12412854,0.0006039201,0.00033076337,0.0000073264623,0.000069076166,0.861747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965502,0.00021635357,0.00019257976,0.0006016448,0.0010530439,0.000002388075,0.0000010592817,0.000008478814,0.0013742683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821913,0.00042055573,0.00023796382,0.00009931982,0.0006431658,0.0003798453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988839,0.0005209741,0.00009802359,0.00013198932,0.00011650095,0.00024863848],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001589627,0.00008576108,0.00008938795,0.000011013381,0.0045120656,0.0004655435,0.00043383215,0.00006961484,0.00010798659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004505281,0.000039421382,0.000079309604,0.00010768797,0.0008958129,0.00014540803,0.000034008746,0.00035173478,0.00005169997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030651794,0.00006214322,0.000043229065,8.323627e-7,0.0000080241725,0.0000057473126,0.0015111519,0.000011077807,0.00013259462,0.8546433,0.10337166,0.040179625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003685576,0.0000801908,0.00036465735,0.000020511747,0.000027279388,0.00005203041,0.003134312,0.00042150088,0.00032720342,0.050935257,0.9441536,0.000114884446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013795525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062436513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98922426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001103304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011404419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125427894","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x10000074","title":"The Failure of Proportionality Tests to Protect Christian Minorities in Western Democracies: <i>Alberta</i><i>v</i><i>Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Taxis; Population; Law; History; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Demography","score_opus":0.0076301296110102106,"score_gpt":0.2514103856929762,"score_spread":0.243780256081966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125427894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660848,0.00011098209,0.00014291712,0.018154861,0.00082515035,0.0005860839,0.00005545432,0.000014946345,0.01402482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981015,0.00001062021,0.0005122619,0.00018996435,0.00039280494,0.000014874009,0.0000010351678,0.000010335075,0.00076663913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980711,0.00021450726,0.00056669785,0.00016142987,0.0005909277,0.0003953796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985996,0.0004155812,0.00023904421,0.00017744469,0.00022201068,0.0003463456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013049747,0.00010647433,0.0002614085,0.00013497962,0.0011864174,0.00028352634,0.0004484014,0.00014438883,0.00022652734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010199371,0.00009877447,0.00010561225,0.0002773527,0.0020108025,0.00021089579,0.000044725,0.0005772242,0.000014472895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073901174,0.00091679377,0.08346174,0.00036538308,0.00014398905,0.0001990851,0.059640665,0.000047748727,0.018212855,0.79489183,0.027992405,0.013388474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060225406,0.00027066132,0.07977112,0.00023909475,0.000045076322,0.00009385264,0.0035784238,0.000006301416,0.0004920797,0.009566965,0.90499014,0.00034406234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.260827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98965037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8769977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017898332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082589226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91250837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131691028","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x14000507","title":"Solemnisation of Same-sex Marriage and Religious Freedom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious freedom; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Economic freedom","score_opus":0.012431040881676373,"score_gpt":0.27459906697655434,"score_spread":0.262168026094878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131691028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054935396,0.00020905462,0.066531144,0.004013859,0.0005961869,0.00010851123,0.000018053977,0.00004185477,0.87354594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946993,0.000061525185,0.003760176,0.00043287323,0.000879384,5.902276e-7,9.2986005e-7,0.0000052373425,0.00015996401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988782,0.00021295351,0.00023947399,0.000093239425,0.0003373491,0.00023879645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989338,0.00052548095,0.000103315746,0.00006784627,0.00009836083,0.00027120014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006986269,0.00006944262,0.00015733544,0.000028130047,0.00056456425,0.00006310702,0.00011447418,0.00006876265,0.00014540946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057962566,0.000062666455,0.00005026487,0.000055571727,0.0017082645,0.00009957141,0.00002395511,0.00017556392,0.000012832898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008692595,0.000018285238,0.0006582948,0.0000033917083,0.000008297173,0.0000035896985,0.0004286233,0.000023318227,0.000044770288,0.99653405,0.0005194931,0.0017492023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082500937,0.00030688598,0.0033204693,0.00008698909,0.00009514355,0.00015064611,0.0023122232,0.000559701,0.000115523064,0.21872011,0.77315915,0.00034816551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016613102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051434647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9397639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037989757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022838045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6294171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149054725","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x11000408","title":"Religion in the Public Forum","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Impossibility; Relevance (law); Irrational number; Democracy; State (computer science); Human rights; Religious belief; Religious freedom; Margin of appreciation; Law; Political science; Freedom of religion; Sociology; Epistemology; Christianity; First amendment; Separation of church and state; Philosophy; Fundamental rights; Religious studies","score_opus":0.05067172917526061,"score_gpt":0.3004998651400729,"score_spread":0.24982813596481226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149054725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004779404,0.00009746838,0.0036451833,0.014382648,0.00032889567,0.00006489305,0.000002251041,0.000017153518,0.9766821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487656,0.000041250754,0.0008373689,0.0037218817,0.00043925602,0.0000023332766,4.5922897e-7,0.000003753491,0.0000771296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985985,0.00031704427,0.0001949785,0.000078972924,0.0003809551,0.00042954084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993283,0.00027347426,0.000050076243,0.00008192286,0.00006953993,0.00019670042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000889004,0.0000622485,0.000085427084,0.000034629596,0.00094873813,0.00011042685,0.00034580528,0.000058017926,0.00041880156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037441408,0.00004214341,0.00006287034,0.00016312615,0.0011410379,0.00021170068,0.000020303669,0.00034096255,0.00008700419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062967797,0.000053024793,0.0013225434,4.2865176e-7,0.0000031377085,0.000068596884,0.00083172054,2.6914782e-7,6.137916e-7,0.99534607,0.001856333,0.00051093753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014141848,0.000055513363,0.0018911085,0.000011782429,0.000008816512,0.00017174146,0.004424265,0.0000055640253,0.0000025099446,0.12498783,0.8682026,0.00009679542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020718458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005703477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99009717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006653753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044660032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72970223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156426881","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x07000361","title":"Sacramental Sharing in Roman Catholic Canon Law: A Comparison of Approaches in Great Britain, Ireland and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Theology and Canon Law Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Canon law; Law; Canon; Political science; Classics; History; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.0421797874766863,"score_gpt":0.24711739302286012,"score_spread":0.20493760554617382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156426881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94415337,0.00093226193,0.00001606091,0.00018027832,0.00013539803,0.00006484837,0.000009386209,0.000005352065,0.05450306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959487,0.0000063259085,0.00004558526,0.00012317553,0.00014902654,0.0000019081695,0.0000018388387,0.000009293164,0.00006799504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885905,0.000045404402,0.00043795613,0.00015323027,0.00016041141,0.0003439403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957055,0.0001541714,0.00008240859,0.00006575733,0.000022755286,0.00010435485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004121166,0.0001291964,0.0003351984,0.00005950403,0.00028084352,0.000054326338,0.000109165354,0.000052258216,0.00012067758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022336215,0.000111905676,0.00002974136,0.000024200977,0.0006161778,0.000100769874,0.00006566182,0.0003930144,7.6926426e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010821128,0.00010075449,0.07929701,0.000024948853,0.000026634365,0.00017148603,0.008157086,0.000022321736,0.000009206388,0.91090125,0.00006411176,0.0011170065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011156909,0.0016072167,0.71347094,0.0014511829,0.00033238056,0.0018198881,0.10189948,0.0015979066,0.0012087538,0.07292227,0.09028674,0.0022463198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47473446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83797896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001217939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046146422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52876335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158089866","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x12000403","title":"What's Sincerity Got to Do with It? Freedom of Religion in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Plaintiff; Law; Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Faith; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Democracy; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02053939208946261,"score_gpt":0.28723724704608883,"score_spread":0.26669785495662623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158089866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96145797,0.00094989326,0.00027891443,0.017780647,0.0014012286,0.0002829944,0.0000067345522,0.000013668226,0.017827937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973295,0.00015913344,0.0014486465,0.00044162502,0.00057852064,0.000003538692,3.482293e-7,0.000007311085,0.000031397933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800783,0.00019932978,0.00031748816,0.000120918696,0.0007683561,0.00058607734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884486,0.00029027616,0.00010034319,0.0000772317,0.00017008619,0.00051721453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066448725,0.000119103395,0.00026262633,0.000022451244,0.000538659,0.00014045893,0.00021982283,0.000059528178,0.00014426584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004159366,0.00008430177,0.00004262562,0.00023698762,0.0003122244,0.0007352416,0.000058714395,0.00032730907,0.000012393137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006255298,0.00063214777,0.28094405,0.000062348015,0.0001960994,0.00020014655,0.08501152,0.0014135749,0.00021789667,0.59236014,0.027201626,0.011134915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018802824,0.00041114574,0.6061887,0.0012041731,0.00011743729,0.000076502976,0.15823966,0.000058097536,0.00035164854,0.0020085338,0.2283583,0.0011055262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9259389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5903516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010620822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037651547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4142984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320468231","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00006554","title":"Emerging Legal Issues Involving Islam in Europe","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Conversation; Political science; Subject (documents); Soviet union; Classics; Law; Theology; Humanities; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Library science","score_opus":0.01271117894001443,"score_gpt":0.29936639385805275,"score_spread":0.2866552149180383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320468231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073727235,0.0013222671,0.002046493,0.0059576673,0.000747895,0.000100986166,0.0000013815559,0.00007222682,0.91602385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633986,0.00023916698,0.00089891243,0.00016413057,0.0016447635,0.0000012514382,0.0000015459246,0.0000124100325,0.0006979526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835134,0.00024661352,0.0003380358,0.0001446503,0.0004969038,0.00042246943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994837,0.00011335423,0.0000733458,0.000067312525,0.00015975523,0.00010251504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008628907,0.00009615658,0.0001403461,0.000095009826,0.0007529251,0.00037940723,0.0002045781,0.00007258928,0.00020031742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044814477,0.00008938676,0.000052083753,0.0003429136,0.00026535807,0.0004497872,0.00003002308,0.00030091943,0.00006053815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075099997,0.00006165917,0.0009464671,0.000002765386,0.0000021037326,0.00012927833,0.0011310079,0.00015962392,0.00016384243,0.9919119,0.0044004675,0.0010833652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013208635,0.0001327304,0.023845568,0.0002291296,0.0000458169,0.000118885706,0.007895471,0.0015454768,0.00036007358,0.7977048,0.16615888,0.00064227555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029779129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052336786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9226126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094554794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000094392926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97668165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332931160","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x13000902","title":"Joint Assembly of the Anglican Church of Canada and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Synod; Convention; Context (archaeology); General assembly; Religious studies; Political science; Theology; Law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01756096524075337,"score_gpt":0.2477105737714764,"score_spread":0.23014960853072303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332931160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96276236,0.00029383635,0.0000050618223,0.023380833,0.00020981758,0.00028481724,0.000007595915,0.0000024829667,0.0130531965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929816,0.000029448176,0.000058140115,0.00036496812,0.00015305457,0.000008043586,1.04950466e-7,0.0000060275315,0.00008205019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975159,0.0005579873,0.00044784677,0.00011740105,0.0009442681,0.00041658655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985333,0.0007549943,0.00017314164,0.000111229696,0.00022280366,0.00020452704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078828604,0.00011385926,0.0003337772,0.000010510326,0.00072943856,0.000046791713,0.00035460992,0.000051420968,0.00021673109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091553933,0.000055496912,0.00007087186,0.00018769423,0.001116494,0.000078627796,0.00010086777,0.00046798354,7.3584874e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004917577,0.00043975996,0.14904425,0.00019434823,0.0008441863,0.00013934592,0.09288232,0.0005188951,0.0068273637,0.6645961,0.059502263,0.024519414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011205967,0.000027744403,0.9686894,0.00008808072,0.000034970824,0.000021071028,0.02429769,0.00030185838,0.00023487095,0.0018501455,0.0031599104,0.00017368187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8196451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006496936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014193445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56103253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336029995","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16000077","title":"‘A Delicate Exercise’: Balancing Freedom for and Freedom from Religion in Canada: <i>Loyola High School v Quebec (Attorney General)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Charter; Free Exercise Clause; Establishment Clause; Freedom of religion; Conscience; Political science; Sociology; Freedom of thought; Human rights; First amendment","score_opus":0.010136665900725423,"score_gpt":0.23830265824073227,"score_spread":0.22816599234000684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336029995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7857163,0.0026556351,0.116023876,0.04043306,0.0044461107,0.0011444202,0.0012779946,0.00014027368,0.04816234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886763,0.0002486472,0.0075236536,0.0013887185,0.0018748807,0.000012923043,0.0000052370365,0.000017295275,0.00025231612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997957,0.00015045049,0.000498993,0.00028151157,0.00046223716,0.0006498052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787366,0.00094149896,0.00014652614,0.00013410958,0.00017537066,0.0007288093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004594319,0.00017621016,0.00033331994,0.00004320354,0.0007354641,0.00012662483,0.00027042284,0.00011233067,0.00015125268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006305554,0.00013439398,0.000069030335,0.000098492514,0.00080982,0.00027606534,0.00005003253,0.00025357917,0.000014587263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006741936,0.000019132773,0.0076826853,0.0000033280833,0.000016150507,0.000038635026,0.00005045478,0.000043612574,0.00022861086,0.98312455,0.006973674,0.0017517668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004059061,0.00011925335,0.04650453,0.00088248827,0.000187066,0.00006303688,0.0007390705,0.00042416618,0.0002730702,0.06922041,0.87639576,0.0011320955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91390413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011521905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005162966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.915888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496097228","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x00004592","title":"Illuminating the Law: Medieval Legal Manuscripts in Cambridge Collections, Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge edited by Susan L'Engle and Robert Gibbs, Harvey Miller Publications, Imprint of Brepols Publishers, London/Toronto, 2001, pp. 263 (pbk £30.00) ISBN 1-872501-53-2","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Classical Studies and Legal History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Art history; Media studies; Art; Classics; History; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.022692823489413625,"score_gpt":0.21611598651009575,"score_spread":0.19342316302068213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496097228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027081134,0.039176486,0.00030555253,0.035509136,0.0055860784,0.0014081353,0.0006920085,0.00024490702,0.8899966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572115,0.0015433644,0.00014514905,0.0015188884,0.0022356417,0.00007531494,0.000046925878,0.00008263518,0.037140597],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615,0.0003470415,0.0012387545,0.0005219439,0.0008242075,0.0009180541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975864,0.00060847774,0.00041761267,0.00037434266,0.00052304106,0.0004901043],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010150186,0.0004373751,0.0006615437,0.00011393945,0.0026385102,0.0013802268,0.00048811498,0.00017572222,0.007245306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005446037,0.00033364617,0.00024624908,0.000205501,0.0017294043,0.0014548536,0.00022545746,0.0011958117,0.000029955632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000407929,0.0005018749,0.000109611254,0.00003079433,0.00011980227,0.00002528183,0.0011588396,0.000003218184,0.00008972303,0.15725555,0.83966,0.0010045344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011646863,0.00024812258,0.002384688,0.00009480428,0.00008502971,0.00013729278,0.0027214354,0.00088327925,0.000027165623,0.000054035536,0.9917961,0.00040338835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062525034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10445104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93013036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066476356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008114052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563036451","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16001587","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Work (physics); Theology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Advertising; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.018217243934284498,"score_gpt":0.2709534100097946,"score_spread":0.25273616607551014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563036451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90905625,0.0001483589,0.00014768263,0.02063786,0.0006837588,0.00013156558,0.000027226639,0.000009748024,0.069157556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984394,0.000022314567,0.0002625301,0.00012383905,0.00042216698,0.0000011649752,4.7035993e-8,0.0000050053227,0.00072353944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983079,0.00022880246,0.00029610883,0.000088820685,0.00074350706,0.0003348579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989813,0.0003417245,0.00016477918,0.00009355495,0.00023937109,0.00017927411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043229497,0.000080095415,0.00019649096,0.000008024783,0.0008030715,0.000016532702,0.00036462361,0.00005221621,0.00042691594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008781844,0.00003677751,0.000106777894,0.0001190378,0.0009859797,0.000078147714,0.000075262324,0.00014799698,0.0000016272954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049523795,0.000103241,0.017561363,0.00001655242,0.00016305991,0.000025602409,0.0043120347,0.00002089999,0.008032749,0.9476639,0.015822202,0.0062288917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021357166,0.00023045797,0.7332579,0.00053453597,0.00019555449,0.00008227719,0.00966543,0.000035901223,0.0120355375,0.014920504,0.22618216,0.00072402175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33004937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5958394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9327434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026183907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003749548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6744119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607013338","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x16000533","title":"How Relevant to the United Kingdom are the ‘Religious’ Cases of the US Supreme Court?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; CITES; Law; Constitution; Kingdom; Relevance (law); Political science","score_opus":0.040039398134655436,"score_gpt":0.29618333614820974,"score_spread":0.2561439380135543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607013338","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35114,0.00025366576,0.011736652,0.60387635,0.0018550385,0.00050892,0.00020701649,0.000050815317,0.030371547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948973,0.00005179369,0.00011676518,0.0034602091,0.0010978703,0.0000032834166,2.5969874e-7,0.000008721856,0.00036379835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997875,0.0005612105,0.00024451342,0.000119556025,0.00076270447,0.00043704826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674284,0.002231188,0.00018974338,0.00025771203,0.000327037,0.00025145258],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007648446,0.00011667555,0.00015868257,0.000026726188,0.0020443527,0.00017675948,0.00076009805,0.00006173075,0.00007583811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028092782,0.00004228348,0.00015366112,0.00029431723,0.0030215622,0.00008725687,0.00010410838,0.0002943705,0.00002573681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021368485,0.000021426109,0.0014546909,0.00000128687,0.000023873601,0.000022690374,0.00026507757,0.0000463148,0.000046316778,0.9902556,0.0076304665,0.00021091854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001569559,0.00005741218,0.0027536056,0.0001240982,0.000059001035,0.00019867058,0.0015885533,0.000008995284,0.00008703288,0.0056710257,0.9891868,0.00010779878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031694516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042220578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98458457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011263495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054099865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971640652","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x19000565","title":"<i>Oikonomia</i>, Divorce and Remarriage in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition Kevin Schembri Pontificio Istituto Orientale, Rome, Kanonika 23, 2017, 327 pp (hardback €35.00) ISBN: 978-88-97789-39-0","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Byzantine Studies and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University; Canon (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Remarriage; Religious studies; Theology; Sociology; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.025288651490823447,"score_gpt":0.21876372555240067,"score_spread":0.1934750740615772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971640652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36750343,0.0047386363,0.00032267327,0.0028073688,0.0035816873,0.0006822029,0.00015437495,0.000075647295,0.620134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912897,0.00029532122,0.0002543684,0.00091812765,0.0021452163,0.000012071794,0.000026850545,0.00004675911,0.005011602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740213,0.00023585914,0.00075025554,0.0004849357,0.000503748,0.000623098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987466,0.00027830392,0.00026359106,0.00037307382,0.00011238858,0.00022608919],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090689573,0.00039053868,0.0005750202,0.00010545693,0.0013592921,0.0007119102,0.00041423552,0.000121617006,0.0015625563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067442146,0.00028954854,0.00022752237,0.000075000455,0.0008705184,0.0006079115,0.00012541005,0.0009775105,0.0006644698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022623247,0.00034943945,0.0011595001,0.00010743661,0.000094676325,0.00024073536,0.007821052,0.000011885339,0.00013080015,0.9562366,0.03291272,0.00070891256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015117968,0.0003363314,0.0039119176,0.00027631086,0.00010456404,0.00042682185,0.007436104,0.00033504688,0.000013052883,0.00057736645,0.9845761,0.0004945943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003794326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025350072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000486583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007965793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998635348","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x19001868","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Session (web analytics); Theology; Political science; Law; Advertising; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.014206956771013272,"score_gpt":0.2652995725323078,"score_spread":0.25109261576129455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998635348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90062916,0.000104749335,0.000013061936,0.003933969,0.00059556967,0.00012659257,0.000009808725,0.0000051767274,0.09458192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998413,0.000010804309,0.00024843588,0.00015937033,0.00029821703,8.23621e-7,1.437037e-7,0.0000052516903,0.00086390274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982944,0.00020552505,0.00028929024,0.00009226095,0.00079647836,0.0003220456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913836,0.00022315994,0.00016656065,0.00010325719,0.00021786708,0.0001507878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042449517,0.00008128612,0.00022474433,0.000008298901,0.00061103166,0.000023502773,0.0003736119,0.000055630946,0.0006356412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037880635,0.00004826866,0.0001128231,0.00014713923,0.0005288103,0.00007130054,0.00007872854,0.00026248218,0.000003667837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052160653,0.00012284023,0.048094314,0.000041299838,0.00018895375,0.00001819989,0.008070407,0.00033297468,0.0035451322,0.92837036,0.009887504,0.0012758411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015393754,0.00023264867,0.81733906,0.00027659524,0.00015609564,0.000060044902,0.020318815,0.00029245138,0.0038932038,0.0056479294,0.14962046,0.0006233075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4403092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5145524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92272246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021497016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038526967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6959826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225131920","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x22000242","title":"Institut de Taoïsme Fung Loy Kok c Ville de Montréal","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01527663489589245,"score_gpt":0.2537257874834631,"score_spread":0.23844915258757063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225131920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024820529,0.14004812,0.010379785,0.090877496,0.012985804,0.00042822008,0.00012938438,0.00016816547,0.7201625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824297,0.0006546623,0.0016882253,0.0020736642,0.0032846597,0.000024485586,0.0000018857752,0.000028332495,0.00981443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613285,0.0011935898,0.0004484608,0.0002852688,0.00085547916,0.0010843399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874085,0.00011318634,0.00017406976,0.00013927846,0.0001078689,0.00072477275],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018154143,0.00025504836,0.00037460815,0.000045179448,0.013165676,0.00014928955,0.0005052573,0.00015645217,0.0068955463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034127527,0.00025672247,0.00032322513,0.00036176087,0.0014246585,0.0003379468,0.0002560626,0.0017198789,0.00020844117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011191075,0.00043826326,0.00030309186,0.000023159766,0.00015255352,0.00162862,0.047667257,0.002688915,0.00009025807,0.8835684,0.05328069,0.010046871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000473514,0.0002682403,0.000232843,0.00004886244,0.00016705121,0.0014267906,0.04100554,0.00035849152,0.0000051229013,0.019336648,0.93636227,0.0003146105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013659364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006697135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9576091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020612422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059219945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233277998","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x1400088x","title":"The All Party Parliamentary Group on International Freedom of Religion or Belief","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Hostility; Government (linguistics); Population; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Demography; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02045384112125888,"score_gpt":0.3015496449100306,"score_spread":0.28109580378877175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233277998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018089784,0.000110250694,0.016499296,0.030745476,0.0038420076,0.00019400229,0.00004727473,0.000053549007,0.9304184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943164,0.00019175721,0.001142758,0.002248767,0.0017576842,0.0000022906825,0.0000037119096,0.0000064048004,0.0003302394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983239,0.0002746428,0.0003200317,0.000110228946,0.00066203636,0.00030914042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798083,0.0014127338,0.00014446887,0.0001040253,0.0001152779,0.00024267008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009186601,0.0000888401,0.00012978159,0.00002209077,0.0009909506,0.000112933856,0.0003844633,0.000058209655,0.00028288743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006595824,0.000054383458,0.00009591859,0.000058474663,0.0016555319,0.00011604067,0.00003913585,0.00027883824,0.000040701623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011511188,0.0000742355,0.00021602427,0.0000010008932,0.00003093055,0.000006161507,0.000097467804,0.000046954803,0.000010355638,0.988869,0.007779881,0.0027528591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026217883,0.00022594386,0.00043611365,0.000035273955,0.000021754184,0.0000198679,0.00033672908,0.0000949993,0.00001536692,0.019479735,0.97898716,0.00008485131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021441216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037740485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010218917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020356105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7621691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381281564","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x23000042","title":"Personnel Files, Confidentiality and the Right to Privacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Theology and Canon Law Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Duty; Reputation; Internet privacy; Dignity; Administration (probate law); Business; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.021508428926098458,"score_gpt":0.24122903873872892,"score_spread":0.21972060981263047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381281564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46092302,0.0010336115,0.0011518261,0.057111166,0.004016317,0.0005533649,0.00011984114,0.00033540028,0.47475544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99439096,0.000032423268,0.00002887263,0.0016744501,0.0011815475,0.000008585807,0.0000014279908,0.000009222124,0.00267251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905694,0.00015660639,0.0002065291,0.00013112891,0.00016999799,0.00027878094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916875,0.00047838734,0.000042901524,0.00010592366,0.00007059401,0.00013345381],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063882413,0.00010866752,0.00020388023,0.000031888034,0.002176101,0.00027718,0.00017921631,0.00003199277,0.0037507862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016051356,0.000060940485,0.00008245213,0.000033095825,0.0015003423,0.00009226944,0.000132366,0.00027674995,0.00044082289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010908835,0.000012320368,0.000011475246,0.0000050183353,0.00006122829,0.000033686443,0.017598614,0.0000019026829,0.0000037954014,0.96746236,0.014249668,0.00045081368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014003376,0.00009827041,0.0011317831,0.000037377016,0.0001099256,0.00016881204,0.013935949,0.00007495599,0.000029177481,0.1601307,0.8226797,0.00020300437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014625887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010534726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000101311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013315588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396776965","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000127","title":"Re Holy Trinity and St Jude, Halifax","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04011560889809949,"score_gpt":0.25451207364144524,"score_spread":0.21439646474334575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396776965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123646684,0.0018776065,0.0075679524,0.0071901525,0.0029558307,0.00016967834,0.0002683092,0.00034914838,0.8559746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99663615,0.000052389336,0.000121001875,0.00050716434,0.0015001113,0.0000013699644,0.0000070422866,0.000015071417,0.0011596822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990511,0.000059841524,0.00028518852,0.00012979188,0.00024755544,0.00022654359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994629,0.000111374946,0.000034431054,0.000082519866,0.00006874593,0.00024004767],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034384214,0.00012208996,0.00014980743,0.000058832265,0.0007382865,0.0015716635,0.00009531307,0.000048225895,0.0039532455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047859827,0.00008574225,0.00007941015,0.000023286635,0.0003030164,0.000504018,0.000035027642,0.00051872426,0.00034623168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023626782,0.000035201294,0.000016246971,0.000047871195,0.000034700497,0.000112483576,0.0039035312,0.000003047886,0.000004835485,0.9685972,0.017196098,0.010025157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003787851,0.00015265272,0.00088141015,0.00015867045,0.000058076414,0.00029891674,0.0023511231,0.0031416921,0.000023806011,0.04381181,0.94848984,0.00025322358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001705488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093852036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9312937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031343963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032603348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408170656","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000838","title":"General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Synod; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014200758939490672,"score_gpt":0.284790262601031,"score_spread":0.27058950366154033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408170656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.713247,0.000386036,0.00014563731,0.01878687,0.0010799909,0.00018192589,0.000017521328,0.000010981073,0.26614407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980779,0.000016844791,0.00030383634,0.00027681977,0.00021226994,0.0000013655492,1.155374e-7,0.0000030631718,0.0011077704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985149,0.00022141876,0.0003075216,0.00008597214,0.00057906465,0.00029110487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916106,0.00026697654,0.00012543473,0.000090452355,0.00024525844,0.00011078451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041653286,0.000077199555,0.00021039647,0.0000125009165,0.0010571686,0.000025862013,0.00037973517,0.00005540218,0.00017871408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077593635,0.00004695855,0.00010838155,0.00024244537,0.0007862263,0.0000507073,0.00009194867,0.00025774032,4.9821807e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022497177,0.00006262065,0.007991371,0.000020924468,0.00012179289,0.000009631802,0.0023334662,0.00009528565,0.0006831502,0.973302,0.01403693,0.0013203307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001407042,0.00011058894,0.70929277,0.00046882257,0.0002839487,0.000025057354,0.019275598,0.00024353608,0.005284626,0.019378277,0.2437227,0.00050703593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48026302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6813512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002577006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061540987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8130993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408170771","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x24000589","title":"VII: Edmund Wood (1841–1932)","year":2025,"lang":"la","type":"article","venue":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.02515036976331724,"score_gpt":0.3120235028224869,"score_spread":0.28687313305916967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408170771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04413295,0.0017562851,0.009538299,0.015603031,0.013494545,0.00048148108,0.000058181286,0.00018077274,0.91475445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969419,0.00029325197,0.0009080181,0.0019529214,0.0025055285,0.0000035672576,0.0000020898099,0.000025551366,0.024890045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957348,0.0008441134,0.0008547876,0.0004695428,0.00091626745,0.0011804635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976917,0.00063166034,0.0002548964,0.00031067917,0.00024776332,0.0008632872],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018093536,0.00037540417,0.0005864145,0.00008417215,0.005066137,0.000657215,0.00087296485,0.0006626516,0.0057356386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048969634,0.0003680632,0.00061749684,0.0006392089,0.002305226,0.0004903083,0.00014194121,0.002044012,0.00075604056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071888615,0.00034932635,0.00049178995,0.000046706406,0.00021539134,0.00019097941,0.0049972115,0.000029561626,0.000077479766,0.9269004,0.06466689,0.0019624077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001225073,0.00020840058,0.004085617,0.00049748324,0.00047202126,0.000074851785,0.010427535,0.000078324425,0.00009253917,0.02782725,0.9543467,0.00066421396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005390115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060939166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92528605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007672859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007875169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}