{"meta":{"query_hash":"6f4f3ddcca3a","filters":{"venue":"Ecological Economics"},"cohort_total":148,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":148,"exported":148,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6f4f3ddcca3a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Ecological+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W1511624900","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.019","title":"","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Geological formations and processes","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Outcrop; Carbonate; Sedimentary rock; Lithification; Structural basin; Paleontology; Clastic rock; Geomorphology; Geochemistry; Carbonate platform; Carbonate rock; Petrology; Sedimentary depositional environment","score_opus":0.011957884012829602,"score_gpt":0.18391479087556767,"score_spread":0.17195690686273807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511624900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98264986,0.000016152397,0.000042588425,0.002268381,0.0006848017,0.00016058194,0.000041314426,0.00012239626,0.014013928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918745,0.00006446973,0.0055659483,0.0021975667,0.00016616104,0.0000040318323,0.00008632266,0.0000015047125,0.00003950058],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986381,0.00003211312,0.00041715128,0.0003511965,0.000049977618,0.0005114507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876595,0.00053213746,0.00012449065,0.00022416872,0.000042793497,0.00031046942],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000512066,0.00017802493,0.00025182674,0.000055298264,0.00045225292,0.00017144578,0.0004930364,0.0002460315,0.017189207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037036152,0.00012430495,0.00009439594,0.00013274615,0.00025063442,0.0006393041,0.000028708659,0.00048290385,0.0005845054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027301227,0.000048207854,0.95196337,0.0000032412788,0.000006287973,0.0000040475925,0.000034092285,0.010447855,0.000018164192,0.0070888977,0.000027514872,0.030330995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024053182,0.00025709064,0.9161843,3.5410142e-7,0.0000038311327,0.000043502347,0.00007533233,0.014172653,0.00007190344,0.05945243,0.009289809,0.00020827189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002528111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026133794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052363534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000002101098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043179625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99163675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571182591","doi":"","title":"D. Armitage, F. Berkes and N. Doubleday, Editors, Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning and Multi-Level Governance, UBC Press, Vancouver (2007) ISBN 978-0-7748-1390-7 360 pp","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Management; Regional science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.035543899547117314,"score_gpt":0.22472579603698215,"score_spread":0.18918189648986483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571182591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56524175,0.0030974941,0.0009229594,0.0009407795,0.011370416,0.0027565057,0.00022976146,0.0005981785,0.41484216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93699586,0.017137142,0.015885612,0.0033800798,0.008505245,0.00040034114,0.000101756064,0.00019830457,0.017395657],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982992,0.000018717441,0.00048826,0.00067834655,0.00005884555,0.00045666634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991222,0.00009397611,0.0004288064,0.00016317071,0.00014224432,0.000049623333],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031578817,0.00036196876,0.0004820783,0.00005601977,0.0006190418,0.00035363744,0.00019723496,0.00016542556,0.0005518278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009894787,0.00034296387,0.0000621202,0.00010359896,0.00025309462,0.00131584,0.0005747968,0.00024372138,0.00012531539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000728207,0.00095897657,0.1499487,0.0002821712,0.000973279,0.000059397888,0.000698518,0.0020587824,0.0000037883797,0.15148088,0.6665584,0.026248893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019653456,0.00009995422,0.08082952,0.00001673605,0.000086953005,9.496791e-7,0.0015870181,0.015366922,0.000006766763,0.00091597205,0.89852804,0.0005958019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017860594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026271679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3974465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011100375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022115128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581972668","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.07.008","title":"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.023080649074894148,"score_gpt":0.22349967797619277,"score_spread":0.20041902890129862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581972668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991197,0.00001668845,0.00017295683,0.0036257545,0.00031475883,0.0005333849,0.00004973368,0.0008112818,0.003278457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872493,0.00003280444,0.00829112,0.0039525856,0.00021516031,0.00014006904,0.000024929914,0.000073901254,0.0000201025],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969112,0.00007641432,0.00084077637,0.00094197446,0.0000688867,0.0011607187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822646,0.0002638705,0.00030143766,0.0006142804,0.00005362837,0.0005403277],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084588415,0.0004011779,0.0006288863,0.00013553523,0.00035909153,0.00016001091,0.00078245276,0.00034094986,0.00033678557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057850644,0.00037302976,0.0002811802,0.00021928563,0.00042832407,0.00075294357,0.0003556002,0.0004030447,0.0068273493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030156644,0.0017776979,0.045980394,0.0000038599806,0.00008003662,0.00009650449,0.000271468,0.5784761,0.0018777188,0.37034595,0.00007423709,0.0007145113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056010494,0.00085234724,0.6796915,0.0000030970475,0.000019808287,0.000105457955,0.0002204431,0.00048658112,0.0030519362,0.30635232,0.0029262183,0.0006892493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058353173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014930344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6337111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002020204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019375127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881108631","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.001","title":"Setting the limits to extraction: A biophysical approach to mining activities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación","keywords":"Deliberation; Operationalization; Ecosystem services; Natural resource; Conceptualization; Stock (firearms); Process (computing); Business; Computer science; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Economics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04041470841865604,"score_gpt":0.22895177131697564,"score_spread":0.1885370628983196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881108631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88591874,0.0000075742555,0.0016581607,0.0009734652,0.0003132835,0.00017463558,0.0000020841592,0.00016433769,0.11078772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99194324,0.000002987874,0.006079485,0.0006733663,0.0003784529,0.00008623677,0.0000020105658,0.000016667469,0.0008175713],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935156,0.000023149583,0.00014984459,0.00018467146,0.00004261107,0.00024816286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951935,0.00012518182,0.000019896066,0.000161456,0.000007366633,0.00016673759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002672888,0.00011753738,0.0001480567,0.000044174052,0.000080346,0.00008216892,0.00018214702,0.00006194245,0.00001722103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060837312,0.00008540297,0.000043412474,0.000078437806,0.00002019898,0.000044876768,0.000091198504,0.00012829283,0.00016424173],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014900114,0.000070529866,0.00016179326,0.000010971458,0.00004205872,0.000002539149,0.0026885823,0.9584698,0.0000980564,0.0017979993,0.024072735,0.012570025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042302758,0.00034605112,0.009250853,0.000014326239,0.000030002431,0.00001935534,0.014306606,0.3957841,0.00047162076,0.00012926859,0.57860446,0.0006203541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000012842335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033017614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5626857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012600247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009059605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3482632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964018439","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.008","title":"Navigating coastal values: Participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":317,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Seascape; Ecosystem services; Recreation; Spatial planning; Environmental resource management; Marine spatial planning; Geography; Wildlife; Spatial ecology; Ecosystem; Environmental planning; Ecology; Economics; Habitat","score_opus":0.03980733486865879,"score_gpt":0.2657816395072278,"score_spread":0.225974304638569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964018439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979544,0.00003807971,0.00021912699,0.000039007497,0.0003856915,0.00026699709,0.000053121592,0.000034133864,0.0010094275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986119,0.0000052489254,0.0009029054,0.00015064549,0.00023236465,0.00005994779,0.000020916308,0.000011736792,0.000004327499],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988202,0.000043245636,0.00043960215,0.00020983288,0.00005278565,0.00043436702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992462,0.00019474904,0.00027783253,0.000137379,0.000005929016,0.00013792753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006302934,0.00013161174,0.00028730667,0.000008328394,0.00014520968,0.000022693861,0.00020741833,0.00011312451,0.0005806295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000134643915,0.00010798186,0.00008716483,0.000037272548,0.000017171198,0.00032653636,0.00019097948,0.00008474751,0.00015940158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023461023,0.000112422,0.9818955,0.00017588015,0.000028450373,6.2965034e-7,0.0016619645,0.014352941,0.00018290181,0.000051768784,0.000028607861,0.0014854674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012592587,0.0003674002,0.7405451,0.00020793773,0.000063257954,0.000013194839,0.0043644216,0.23885483,0.002667099,0.0010077883,0.00997704,0.00067267497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015142381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009650786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24135041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008014798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005691439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6357486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965642028","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.033","title":"Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Underpinning; Representativeness heuristic; Environmental resource management; Psychology; Ecosystem; Social psychology; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.024095063237588275,"score_gpt":0.2606986162016861,"score_spread":0.23660355296409782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965642028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931386,0.000005757128,0.00007475227,0.00033922706,0.00010401796,0.00025938504,0.000011337905,0.000015188013,0.006051751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903214,0.00001154791,0.0005924597,0.00023893773,0.00007198728,0.000026247671,0.000013471832,0.000005332435,0.000007852696],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923205,0.00006361362,0.00026990322,0.00021004751,0.000042667805,0.00018168856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954575,0.00015010806,0.0001839152,0.00007377309,0.000005190947,0.000041239226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035251112,0.000110765744,0.00025246607,0.000007685432,0.00034511756,0.00007628361,0.00019249921,0.00006382854,0.00010139162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000298093,0.00006630992,0.000055029144,0.000024838186,0.000041090287,0.00021087927,0.00018042995,0.00005761166,0.000010966814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045401426,0.00015608696,0.9440161,0.00019844224,0.0001433546,3.134462e-7,0.0032434997,0.021890331,0.0001664194,0.027844485,0.00016332627,0.0021322577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006180133,0.00018433343,0.5291602,0.0000108739605,0.000026065787,0.00000398858,0.0018502808,0.46158886,0.000103732855,0.0036284248,0.00266363,0.00016158092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043273136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018350233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43969852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010629197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000043690566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.270404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967994418","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.019","title":"Wood and non-wood pulp production: Comparative ecological footprinting on the Canadian prairies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pulp (tooth); Ecological footprint; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Agriculture; Taiga; Paper production; Wood production; Agronomy; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Forest management; Biology; Sustainability; Engineering","score_opus":0.01832144692833927,"score_gpt":0.21962903032001616,"score_spread":0.20130758339167687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967994418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93284583,0.000004674258,0.0000017768558,0.008212254,0.00009929489,0.000483404,0.0000031141917,0.00002035158,0.05832929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980985,0.0000058235523,0.00020946085,0.0007836258,0.00008345614,0.000054059055,0.0000037469795,0.0000059381678,0.00075540715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877346,0.00008286992,0.0002339498,0.00042284277,0.00006145384,0.00042543176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937385,0.00017150976,0.00008303111,0.00020891576,0.000003855077,0.00015880953],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004500014,0.00017499544,0.00021209352,0.000018127275,0.0006809065,0.00009678865,0.00018682226,0.00013391944,0.001097925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119139695,0.000117249685,0.00005115752,0.00006509605,0.0008580762,0.00013871827,0.00018364079,0.00025775583,0.00021661143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035785262,0.0005174241,0.9753401,0.0000045130732,0.000017642764,0.00001125873,0.00041396226,0.010489358,0.00009420646,0.008170761,0.003889205,0.0010157289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012067143,0.00023434928,0.9829029,0.0000010449941,0.0000053278713,0.000008244867,0.0004548768,0.00039241905,0.00037350546,0.0075241835,0.007815589,0.00016691814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008518507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26121342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2526949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010016813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028669412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975183154","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.021","title":"Globalization, trade and migration: Undermining sustainability","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Community College; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Natural resource; Globalization; Economics; Population; Resource depletion; Population growth; Natural resource economics; Business; Economic system; Ecology; Market economy","score_opus":0.010607653339337093,"score_gpt":0.22428210658744416,"score_spread":0.21367445324810708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975183154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8342656,0.0000020523426,0.00016724238,0.0021975425,0.000017996786,0.00010214446,0.0000014844193,0.000021382913,0.1632246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834603,0.000027777483,0.0003470889,0.0002580788,0.000032310476,0.000010042476,0.000009184662,0.0000027893843,0.00096668396],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946016,0.000024344936,0.0001349429,0.00019182991,0.00003087032,0.00015784623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979424,0.000047145048,0.000026105956,0.00008287189,0.000002857038,0.000046760346],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014135498,0.00005595483,0.00007611646,0.0000067412525,0.00009968745,0.000046476565,0.00007385833,0.000058718862,0.0040582335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000523423,0.000050463255,0.000016843218,0.000054041877,0.00018173365,0.00012199634,0.00013480715,0.00004875075,0.000017979888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004549802,0.000042604945,0.98324966,0.0000022314996,0.0000010046081,0.0000017573933,0.000013255418,0.00095196057,0.000002032797,0.0063192947,0.0014600494,0.007951567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099361976,0.000045950317,0.83571446,8.1919154e-8,0.000001223351,0.0000040038217,0.000061049446,0.004761686,0.0000037763386,0.02598847,0.13325238,0.00006755614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027116583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020622252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16408047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000246883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012384315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979344163","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.008","title":"Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: A case study in Hangzhou, China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Wetland; Ecosystem services; China; Total economic value; Contingent valuation; Value (mathematics); Valuation (finance); Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Resource (disambiguation); Willingness to pay; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1050702986970693,"score_gpt":0.2499022652335738,"score_spread":0.14483196653650451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979344163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99259126,0.000043356788,0.00051803875,0.0003370341,0.00048087438,0.0015915743,0.0002682093,0.000047327536,0.0041223387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963735,0.00008862335,0.002430516,0.00037911144,0.00010558433,0.00044165459,0.000057912297,0.00003230936,0.00009082511],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975674,0.000051335297,0.001199358,0.000738267,0.00001810166,0.00042550865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988686,0.0001753551,0.00047024587,0.00034546966,0.000011996173,0.00012832422],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009407962,0.00026357104,0.00074706407,0.00018464327,0.00025601182,0.000049982227,0.00023719792,0.00020411517,0.00072529074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049613795,0.00030261136,0.00013783804,0.000120582656,0.000043601853,0.00028841948,0.00011905451,0.00019666331,0.00031080915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025164272,0.00077123765,0.9720198,0.000020722657,0.00007031694,0.00015115153,0.00069286715,0.0098641,0.0000012841218,0.016134955,0.000083519575,0.00016490249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003966973,0.00049821177,0.8963172,0.0000046212135,0.000011988851,0.0005922489,0.0017197334,0.088879295,0.0000038896424,0.006581586,0.0009684597,0.00045581546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056255166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042824615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079015195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008637511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005261598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979527353","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.018","title":"A framework for evaluating collective action and informal institutional dynamics under a resource management policy of decentralization","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Property rights; Collective action; Institutionalisation; Economic system; Common-pool resource; Business; Economics; Political science; Market economy; Politics; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.046473200811931736,"score_gpt":0.2871947888119448,"score_spread":0.2407215880000131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979527353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961759,0.000011185018,0.0012572302,0.0007115398,0.000093604685,0.00030143614,0.000030823758,0.000012888073,0.0014054289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99674416,0.00012685642,0.0023098623,0.00024242357,0.00019153884,0.000024446943,0.00007888653,5.310514e-7,0.00028129824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994978,0.000014463447,0.00016990442,0.00009489512,0.000034882603,0.00018806676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996698,0.00012585097,0.00010270154,0.000018631272,0.000021198908,0.00006185384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019539394,0.00006711805,0.00010529465,0.00001362673,0.00026151884,0.000020427402,0.00005274694,0.00011885982,0.00004487292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003382077,0.000017397451,0.000041349653,0.00008401695,0.000061793566,0.00014135377,0.00004686163,0.000046808676,0.0000013127319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001582221,0.00020722,0.01355269,0.000024485491,0.000055927863,8.548029e-8,0.00017491617,0.0022871646,0.000047013487,0.8166199,0.000027834943,0.16684456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039742826,0.0004408398,0.8999193,0.000012971338,0.000022897128,0.0000066193925,0.0008135317,0.014185826,0.00007642809,0.07155173,0.012410783,0.00016168637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014278762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013968229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88636655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015199349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015378599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20114179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982174961","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.027","title":"Resource compensation and negotiation support in an aboriginal context: Using community-based multi-attribute analysis to evaluate non-market losses","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry","keywords":"Negotiation; Valuation (finance); Damages; Metis; Resource (disambiguation); Human settlement; Context (archaeology); Market value; Compensation (psychology); Economics; Environmental economics; Actuarial science; Public economics; Environmental resource management; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Geography; Political science; Social science; Accounting","score_opus":0.13224036988243354,"score_gpt":0.29920383605948175,"score_spread":0.16696346617704821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982174961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910081,0.00002697644,0.0070329774,0.0007000257,0.00006941403,0.00039749517,0.00016168776,0.000022286758,0.0005810384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99062616,0.00003611232,0.0063015576,0.0025309133,0.00005834825,0.00003454896,0.00031564682,0.00001898501,0.000077746605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809325,0.00014564954,0.00091748143,0.000492453,0.000025418562,0.00032573764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884886,0.00019774347,0.00041091233,0.00034593284,0.000019971723,0.000176608],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019503456,0.00021609686,0.0005974046,0.0004539251,0.00023034542,0.00016792322,0.00022526216,0.0001839357,0.0011253709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072555624,0.00027013654,0.00010477577,0.00022778304,0.00008960823,0.0007222761,0.000068074,0.00025479362,0.00021615492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033219894,0.0002864897,0.730867,0.00000520712,0.000053121865,5.6462403e-7,0.00036931748,0.26695552,0.000011380826,0.0008198873,0.000042262935,0.00055602123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000907426,0.00014475308,0.61461884,0.0000020627551,0.000032814343,7.22624e-7,0.00018249315,0.38157573,0.00002123725,0.0002176179,0.0020870843,0.00020920216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043777828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003914096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11624816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009336513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036475856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983869360","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.006","title":"Illegal GMO releases and corporate responsibility: Questioning the effectiveness of voluntary measures","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Business; Corporate social responsibility; Liability; Damages; Precautionary principle; Agriculture; Externality; Consumption (sociology); Social responsibility; Natural resource economics; Public economics; Economics; Accounting; Biotechnology; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.034866270553437315,"score_gpt":0.23471934343670228,"score_spread":0.19985307288326498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983869360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982683,0.00011209888,0.000028921457,0.00047413673,0.00006589384,0.00030438503,0.000014866082,0.000025514422,0.00070587755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947834,0.00008528248,0.00021389045,0.00010580198,0.00006633706,0.0000084153435,0.000008053153,0.0000010794982,0.000032772863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856246,0.00048792968,0.00027697318,0.00030591484,0.000087159904,0.00027959028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553776,0.004072598,0.000106384694,0.000082283965,0.00008772662,0.00011321902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003947085,0.0001101282,0.00021097972,0.000012857274,0.00019901774,0.00004308534,0.00022944012,0.00013363415,0.00014314037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011125818,0.00003908223,0.000056355864,0.00012684963,0.00040796414,0.000055263878,0.00017964824,0.00018152026,0.000013140592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032977667,0.0004992227,0.59048367,0.000042738677,0.00008057375,0.000027867318,0.00007060217,0.0005368029,0.26816925,0.03204875,0.00008280722,0.10465993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116152216,0.00048392886,0.9751647,0.000006547393,0.0000063806524,0.000009615306,0.00009652556,0.000090276626,0.01065323,0.01276394,0.0005149725,0.000093736504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017866705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012627672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38468102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056835797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024503206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15937272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984357333","doi":"10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00048-4","title":"Economics, ecology-based communities, and sustainability","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological economics; Sustainability; Livelihood; Industrialisation; Context (archaeology); Natural resource; Human development theory; Ecology; Natural (archaeology); Economics; Environmental resource management; Geography; Mainstream economics; Applied economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.014790221238223438,"score_gpt":0.19123377198452918,"score_spread":0.17644355074630574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984357333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97547734,0.000017016604,0.000011260848,0.0025651841,0.000078412064,0.0002786974,0.000007228039,0.00004964669,0.021515187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99472886,0.00024701277,0.000564891,0.0030029782,0.000027159007,0.000054124812,0.000013606395,0.00001436832,0.0013470149],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988112,0.000070662725,0.00029149224,0.00031309584,0.000027515265,0.00048606857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925345,0.00019327532,0.00008796671,0.00028149583,0.0000033432061,0.0001804806],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002809569,0.0001988188,0.00024309309,0.000037542333,0.00029310022,0.000051043247,0.0002673086,0.0001663812,0.015695494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050976087,0.00019972294,0.000056348857,0.00005030511,0.0007430159,0.00021487515,0.00045108827,0.000174467,0.00060094707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023862585,0.00042267554,0.964659,0.000014312008,0.000017438566,0.000008650838,0.0004076919,0.0157099,0.0000020575756,0.0020646893,0.0036707402,0.012999029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008235161,0.00020889236,0.8702166,8.6656195e-7,0.000010046541,0.000008911756,0.0012002642,0.031173833,0.00002815268,0.01610169,0.07978405,0.0004431453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021060667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006784474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09444232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013518998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001538589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9852043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985091715","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.011","title":"Assessment of net ecosystem services of plastic greenhouse vegetable cultivation in China","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse; Ecosystem services; Agriculture; Environmental science; China; Irrigation; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Agricultural science; Agricultural economics; Agronomy; Geography; Biology; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.01239642703596907,"score_gpt":0.2020528255620255,"score_spread":0.18965639852605642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985091715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887155,0.000006308924,0.00001376781,0.0000079241745,0.00011680528,0.00016108462,0.00001592581,0.000011970339,0.010950709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994238,0.00003486014,0.00047270054,0.000021636637,0.000012084745,0.000015002794,0.0000072063485,0.000006099797,0.0000066087837],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907327,0.00004139345,0.0004580128,0.00020556859,0.000049114387,0.00017264806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944735,0.0000639099,0.00028213664,0.00015579253,0.0000043680798,0.000046428635],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027607585,0.000099207326,0.00028783947,0.00003416152,0.000025316067,0.0000061640626,0.0002394705,0.00009432154,0.0017818557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005600443,0.000076881755,0.000051923675,0.0000820034,0.000013990196,0.00023568745,0.00014030008,0.000059655365,0.00006887614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012748119,0.00021353432,0.9863107,0.00009117003,0.000011339898,0.00000101313,0.00018965198,0.01267649,0.00013311127,0.00030226397,0.0000030018878,0.00005493995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030771177,0.00015221367,0.9573544,0.00002203898,0.000007886629,7.961376e-7,0.00005820082,0.040997762,0.0004295091,0.00050913857,0.000073684605,0.0000866252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000962927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012177752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028956305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010866689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009541744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985392933","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.025","title":"Remote tourism and forest management: a spatial hedonic analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Alberta; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Tourism; Forest management; Environmental resource management; Geography; Business; Forestry; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.015771199202001974,"score_gpt":0.19495715134658836,"score_spread":0.17918595214458638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985392933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81982964,0.0001818086,0.0039970465,0.0012807985,0.00024298321,0.00020454192,0.0000373035,0.00007393177,0.17415193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879583,0.0025689376,0.0070135156,0.00076048035,0.00032155978,0.000012095131,0.000030474437,0.00002797389,0.001306673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789536,0.000016209813,0.0008394951,0.00072769367,0.000013576791,0.0005076679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894685,0.000087349115,0.0003518313,0.00041396118,0.000009828546,0.0001901921],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064008,0.00024863804,0.0007150787,0.00039826325,0.00018012874,0.00018522993,0.00029130353,0.00022708463,0.0015254205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040833034,0.00029444357,0.00026803528,0.00020149458,0.00011165583,0.00027384332,0.00022890182,0.00018472198,0.0009773306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001516622,0.00045772013,0.36811304,0.000056174616,0.0021317105,0.00004016089,0.00029641268,0.050164685,7.1806204e-7,0.3743785,0.0015360109,0.20267318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012350108,0.000115819596,0.33654442,0.0000035853398,0.00015090863,0.000009162402,0.000049006394,0.4017385,0.0000031998477,0.08252372,0.17689353,0.00073312974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013668776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020780885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35157382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027003573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009864934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991088917","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.006","title":"Evaluating China's urban environmental sustainability with Data Envelopment Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; World Bank Group","keywords":"Sustainability; Environmental Sustainability Index; Data envelopment analysis; Per capita; Beijing; China; Sustainable development; Urbanization; Gross domestic product; Benchmarking; Index (typography); Natural resource economics; Geography; Business; Economic growth; Economics; Population; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.0911556531172484,"score_gpt":0.3859296661094064,"score_spread":0.294774012992158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991088917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952045,0.000008973715,0.0017117688,0.0012574655,0.00014726244,0.00023503334,0.00005678293,0.000035312372,0.0013428808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889179,0.000004791058,0.010154115,0.00020925971,0.000071977745,0.000013430988,0.000090806505,0.000008551052,0.0005291748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627256,0.00027784012,0.0009474817,0.0015074897,0.00054046046,0.00045414083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995318,0.001366154,0.0004940247,0.0025422096,0.00006907123,0.00021053581],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009478276,0.00022923501,0.0006060726,0.00031704773,0.00041582517,0.00037812255,0.0024177928,0.00015810473,0.004605859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004295504,0.00015296329,0.00018614299,0.00080459926,0.0004924591,0.0004323402,0.0010999151,0.0004201786,0.00024512134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059350456,0.0007041156,0.88532645,0.0000013551909,0.0003712085,0.000012538199,0.00033406468,0.07238413,0.00012323663,0.0013169395,0.00039023254,0.038976364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020304554,0.00012646099,0.70309365,2.586238e-7,0.0002020551,0.0000032844182,0.0003097663,0.2868168,0.000027830803,0.004688092,0.0043097837,0.0002189511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000327802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009637036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21443269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000284967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024483516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992836022","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.002","title":"Energy–environment policy modeling of endogenous technological change with personal vehicles: combining top-down and bottom-up methods","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Top-down and bottom-up design; Greenhouse gas; Economics; Technological change; Production (economics); Environmental economics; Energy (signal processing); Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Natural resource economics; Macroeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04371445970309846,"score_gpt":0.24701984303350988,"score_spread":0.20330538333041143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992836022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886185,0.00029183307,0.0073045013,0.0007307697,0.000038677583,0.00012003587,0.000021161097,0.00008060279,0.002793933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980226,0.0020862643,0.016707039,0.0007464065,0.00007581741,0.00006860444,0.000028883182,0.00002346934,0.000037565576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986072,0.00006072277,0.00042088376,0.00042932166,0.000079864796,0.00040199593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999366,0.00010743325,0.00017140032,0.00020355993,0.000008693059,0.0001429544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022834261,0.00025974974,0.00044086907,0.00012564338,0.00014565609,0.000020154683,0.0001714827,0.00027746215,0.00014929997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018761988,0.00021491911,0.00009102378,0.00007834675,0.000447342,0.00012052406,0.000058334135,0.000198657,0.000007101904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011539455,0.00042258712,0.0047731386,0.00002479949,0.00017008561,0.000022875562,0.0014464699,0.40608037,0.0015111626,0.5518211,6.560446e-7,0.033611335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023594351,0.008207693,0.13740225,0.00019479153,0.000734259,0.00059926894,0.011800172,0.32080942,0.05707372,0.4152882,0.01879574,0.005500129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013903709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027737147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13653292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001704451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8764147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993499059","doi":"10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00041-1","title":"Northwest coast indigenous institutions that supported resilience and sustainability","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of British Columbia; Northern Arizona University","keywords":"Indigenous; Sustainability; Corporate governance; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Environmental ethics; Tragedy of the commons; Environmental resource management; Trespass; Sociology; Political science; Commons; Law; Ecology; Economics; Social science; Management","score_opus":0.06662407721612228,"score_gpt":0.3374401854482899,"score_spread":0.2708161082321676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993499059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98147315,0.00010706207,0.00003310102,0.0022337479,0.0005209127,0.0012092001,0.000069534275,0.00009236811,0.014260901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995491,0.0010649171,0.00009268219,0.0019799625,0.00011814071,0.00023353148,0.000022306098,0.000010501683,0.0009869465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976865,0.00016708553,0.00048080672,0.00042579917,0.00003783426,0.0012019532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998676,0.00051091105,0.0001984086,0.00027196435,0.00014708526,0.00019564008],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056997244,0.0001783626,0.00039485158,0.00006254723,0.0054226397,0.000014102877,0.00018880144,0.00035300964,0.002237576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040563912,0.00015453137,0.000055415916,0.000089602174,0.00039826098,0.00013087002,0.0004047199,0.00051851035,0.0003501244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020617998,0.0002734977,0.976915,0.000052302363,0.000025965788,0.000026301901,0.014600713,0.00020478865,4.774788e-7,0.0055191102,0.001332925,0.0010283231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006572906,0.00036796054,0.8963767,0.0000036392048,0.00001926445,0.000014559925,0.024113959,0.00034036874,0.0000010232588,0.002003224,0.07584975,0.00025225276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019707815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17792131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17595053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097055454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040804854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995425070","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.013","title":"Do children matter? An examination of gender differences in environmental valuation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Recreation; Valuation (finance); Economics; Psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.09539834136989948,"score_gpt":0.20864102285562264,"score_spread":0.11324268148572315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995425070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950819,0.00010778887,0.00039698888,0.00006472921,0.000117562726,0.00028102513,0.00008473192,0.000010503306,0.003854748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986747,0.00022874154,0.0007075924,0.00014138455,0.000041612526,0.0000344805,0.0001227434,0.000014285008,0.000034445882],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855715,0.000033428976,0.0007348915,0.00044845667,0.000021242975,0.00020483026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993206,0.000029899767,0.00037373995,0.00021222097,0.0000019306547,0.00006160333],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066575425,0.00014822224,0.00034944166,0.00015393454,0.000048051093,0.00002951871,0.00018970188,0.00016045125,0.0022903697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015986243,0.00017309243,0.000070563394,0.000042680924,0.000100057885,0.00044061537,0.000059503775,0.00010272015,0.00085748173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055723813,0.0003931045,0.96088904,0.0000028881293,0.0000148886475,2.2239075e-7,0.00036503747,0.0055708108,0.000021564641,0.031735957,0.0000016821101,0.0009992194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008503641,0.00013877818,0.92601675,0.0000020608322,0.000003669957,0.0000022486447,0.00014305918,0.001113435,0.000065823326,0.071474195,0.0000072803564,0.00018234637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000421874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025213543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039738238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005305527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009333435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000241983","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.008","title":"What value São Pedro's procession? Ecosystem services from local people's perceptions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Canada Research Chairs; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Provisioning; Valuation (finance); Perception; Ecosystem valuation; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Value (mathematics); Geography; Business; Ecosystem health; Psychology; Ecology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.005027416186474506,"score_gpt":0.19456926166494687,"score_spread":0.18954184547847236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000241983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939071,0.00003068672,0.00019727419,0.0007145402,0.0007523043,0.00023188675,0.000027487029,0.00011404168,0.0040246653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977134,0.00023214004,0.0002865634,0.0012579281,0.00027041906,0.000061052284,0.00006729301,0.000019402436,0.0000918348],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832636,0.000106311636,0.00042771958,0.00062442507,0.000102069156,0.00041313807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990398,0.00016599026,0.00017906328,0.00036226455,0.00000843874,0.00024439598],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033233577,0.00023989324,0.0003866243,0.00002351022,0.00031050973,0.00026360442,0.00056290935,0.00024654434,0.011986736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000856576,0.00017875056,0.000111375106,0.000088248875,0.000024342013,0.001025659,0.00037782453,0.00014981822,0.008532684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008491782,0.00077827775,0.82868826,0.0002188005,0.00008848261,0.000008377535,0.0034005337,0.14908671,0.00014996121,0.00078573194,0.0008709485,0.015838966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006168093,0.00020744368,0.61164796,0.00006238368,0.000044468896,0.00001162441,0.0038180395,0.35325843,0.00006096408,0.0060835206,0.02362923,0.0005591252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004494921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04784655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21704033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002288112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011399601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008114983","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.004","title":"The why of the “Hau”: scarcity, gifts, and environmentalism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Environmentalism; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Generalization; Ecological economics; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Neoclassical economics; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Political science; Sustainability; Microeconomics; Law; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.007463262999884049,"score_gpt":0.15260686103876964,"score_spread":0.1451435980388856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008114983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876604,0.000024021785,0.000008914227,0.006585558,0.00008879476,0.00016859417,0.000005121609,0.000006152748,0.005452409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763864,0.0002513331,0.00009237471,0.0016180829,0.000012325323,0.0000037110342,8.8103957e-7,0.0000021577418,0.00038048733],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995129,0.000026798545,0.00012473353,0.0001550626,0.000053505726,0.00012700574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996615,0.0000520469,0.00007412033,0.00017455163,9.795879e-7,0.000036771606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018846028,0.00006652748,0.000071599774,0.0000052832565,0.00038677597,0.000025449397,0.0002868415,0.00004236695,0.00037107698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015276513,0.000037391714,0.000048028203,0.00003285682,0.0006719883,0.00004179717,0.00081410364,0.000059779646,0.00006201085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000877458,0.000090228015,0.99067086,0.0000022189831,0.000015008088,6.9361124e-7,0.00023167166,0.00418026,0.00007737281,0.0014051736,0.0006384398,0.0026793152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020784615,0.000030125857,0.9312899,8.5777606e-7,0.000008150884,0.0000012225198,0.00019394365,0.000092197944,0.00009943834,0.004720856,0.06330145,0.00005398452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015760837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064082973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06266301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014441911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035353205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40630326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008379776","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.015","title":"Global potential for carbon sequestration: Geographical distribution, country risk and policy implications","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reforestation; Afforestation; Carbon sequestration; Natural resource economics; Carbon offset; Developing country; Tree planting; Global warming; Climate change; Economics; Geography; Business; Forestry; Economic growth; Ecology","score_opus":0.004836107211118263,"score_gpt":0.21773678529569512,"score_spread":0.21290067808457686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008379776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806928,0.000008423414,0.0005023951,0.0021310113,0.000057615965,0.0002831681,0.00046290457,0.00004252085,0.015819173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851966,0.00007208198,0.0003403019,0.00024015456,0.00028122737,0.000054951586,0.0002922064,0.0000038145126,0.0001956318],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992797,0.000017870378,0.00019058966,0.00024783268,0.000028107463,0.0002359253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969286,0.000032352775,0.000079352125,0.000119972705,0.0000050179683,0.00007046042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012141039,0.00009761037,0.0000994704,0.000012477673,0.00020211244,0.00006305579,0.000110983376,0.000104337814,0.00019264876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003251883,0.00009240388,0.0000456495,0.000118620774,0.00024331946,0.000085839616,0.00009764053,0.00004628746,0.00003324712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017234777,0.00009795924,0.67373455,0.000002562117,0.000008961545,4.15746e-7,0.0000023731272,0.010002676,0.000003940518,0.30616266,0.008749804,0.0012168763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023969142,0.00006510298,0.8584485,2.630263e-7,0.000017061184,0.0000033592125,0.0000013912435,0.008576916,9.80645e-7,0.09655774,0.035986014,0.00010298364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018836804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013252357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20960492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021546405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014938205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3768121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010479715","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.002","title":"Government investment in natural capital","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"World Bank Group; Conservation, Food and Health Foundation","keywords":"Investment (military); Capital (architecture); Fixed investment; Economics; Capital formation; Capital expenditure; Government (linguistics); Physical capital; Fixed capital; Capital investment; Financial capital; Monetary economics; Business; Public economics; Finance; Market economy; Human capital; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.008904135767877864,"score_gpt":0.1773103147829156,"score_spread":0.16840617901503774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010479715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9453885,0.000013263039,0.0000010093856,0.00038877662,0.00012285831,0.00016897135,0.00000204155,0.000018256926,0.053896297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936775,0.0001055807,0.00055181055,0.0025698878,0.00002761189,0.000038228332,0.0000053482045,0.000008126895,0.003015886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998989,0.000020619605,0.00022997674,0.0002922493,0.00009613664,0.00037202673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968946,0.000033679793,0.00004958461,0.00012373873,4.7537594e-7,0.000103089675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011063951,0.00013759993,0.0001488629,0.000014077624,0.00009576646,0.000009480647,0.00018146739,0.00006950962,0.0036123113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025569732,0.00012484068,0.000044832163,0.00006252152,0.0002218454,0.00018001137,0.00033292477,0.00012852569,0.0013705897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037683047,0.00047002098,0.98289883,0.0000024753347,0.000011594601,0.00015880956,0.000843793,0.006632394,0.00019112947,0.0016877551,0.0047398787,0.0023256552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004103843,0.00005638769,0.98290133,6.181038e-7,0.0000011593825,0.000015429256,0.00024026664,0.0006137314,0.00018236895,0.0018453076,0.0135420635,0.00019096617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010088658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025149994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05088041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020344215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012403684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013324405","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.03.004","title":"Behavioral innovations: The missing capital in sustainable development?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministère des Transports","keywords":"Natural capital; Sustainable development; Economics; Dual (grammatical number); Capital (architecture); Environmental quality; Technological change; Human capital; Environmental economics; Behavioral economics; Public economics; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Macroeconomics; Ecosystem services","score_opus":0.08821489164115037,"score_gpt":0.2217644845998781,"score_spread":0.13354959295872773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013324405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832915,0.00013570926,0.00014359276,0.0018160326,0.00014914156,0.00043266002,0.000004738429,0.000021452084,0.014005166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99509186,0.000043184868,0.0013116294,0.0008318381,0.00004438738,0.00021474654,0.000029372914,0.000014865103,0.002418138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984752,0.000014974617,0.0007677094,0.00033839984,0.000011427898,0.00039226533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942344,0.00006435979,0.00024275816,0.00020408707,0.00001110182,0.00005424181],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005938426,0.00014012022,0.00025181146,0.00012895049,0.00020611024,0.00015201111,0.00024594046,0.00012881073,0.0037729705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058329762,0.00013294167,0.00005088524,0.00011844691,0.00009929559,0.0005696075,0.00013239699,0.0001769016,0.003207427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033606289,0.00029941922,0.6395376,0.000006903067,0.00001666906,0.000002644302,0.0008821957,0.0011046848,0.0000056577283,0.3536997,0.00065757334,0.0037835813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035842642,0.00003801264,0.9012188,0.0000016187267,0.000001258373,0.0000022034774,0.001273639,0.001543062,0.000021447197,0.0808824,0.014447814,0.0002113341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030215445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009719772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2728173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067050825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033878096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99756867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015325442","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.018","title":"Twentieth century copper stocks and flows in North America: A dynamic analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Yale University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Copper; Tailings; Material flow analysis; Environmental science; Tailings dam; Lithosphere; Copper mining; Geology; Waste management; Metallurgy; Materials science; Engineering","score_opus":0.004632455790527608,"score_gpt":0.207617823716781,"score_spread":0.2029853679262534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015325442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970848,0.000039578204,0.000035927016,0.00038158635,0.000029149713,0.00021321652,0.000015124271,0.000017139373,0.0021834834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976097,0.0003578878,0.001067897,0.0007102321,0.000010108385,0.000019768006,0.000021896014,0.000006202449,0.00019635275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889654,0.000051922467,0.00026644353,0.00039099107,0.000048958933,0.0003451397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995278,0.000051450796,0.0000660429,0.00019984381,0.0000010510423,0.00015377495],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015295218,0.00014528654,0.00027714387,0.000049636223,0.00007376499,0.000027915468,0.00014691071,0.00008741261,0.0036870604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027264081,0.00012877471,0.00009241924,0.0002252123,0.00024703916,0.00022531814,0.0002706204,0.00016040906,0.00022053436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016530403,0.00023131257,0.9175028,0.0000013539036,0.000025177078,0.000003398999,0.00024513577,0.06643902,0.000015341211,0.000004429539,0.000039398383,0.015476099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023049017,0.00007294269,0.93931425,2.1383713e-7,0.000030075245,0.0000010156451,0.0002721065,0.052598987,0.0000028764318,0.000094543575,0.007226695,0.00015579679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000119482975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014663495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021811455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009612835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005609306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016283768","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.022","title":"Managing without growth","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Obstacle; Poverty; Unemployment; Developing country; Welfare; Greenhouse gas; Green growth; Natural resource economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Sustainable development; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.05947683107935072,"score_gpt":0.22329272998566763,"score_spread":0.1638158989063169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016283768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6716445,0.00023633685,0.00053948537,0.003323794,0.00059537427,0.00018320438,0.00015247794,0.00013044279,0.32319435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99324,0.0005820423,0.0013426101,0.0019193244,0.0006416405,0.000050562427,0.00006308402,0.000042462092,0.0021182732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788445,0.000010652818,0.00087400473,0.00061128347,0.000010372769,0.0006092562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990738,0.00008615219,0.00038712387,0.00032114418,0.000014868335,0.00011692532],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004588383,0.00024761123,0.00058343273,0.00019414311,0.00018374945,0.0001527115,0.0003537024,0.00021038087,0.0021581026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062566745,0.0002959195,0.0001988308,0.000097535194,0.000115534065,0.00030611042,0.00015543478,0.0001879809,0.0045720804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013615267,0.00012256205,0.12205473,0.00001302317,0.000021361433,0.000003562346,0.000035180194,0.0005015608,0.0000028453853,0.8750736,0.0020069994,0.00015095033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068089954,0.00006764191,0.086301975,0.0000032141797,0.000005415556,0.000013016642,0.00003970209,0.007956109,0.00005187241,0.8506005,0.053767256,0.0005124059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047675165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003370402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32159546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030406492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011253653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018327237","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.011","title":"Designing a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program to reduce deforestation in Tanzania: An assessment of payment approaches","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; Agricultural and Applied Economics Association","keywords":"Payment; Ecosystem services; Cash; Incentive; Business; Payment for ecosystem services; Tanzania; Natural resource economics; Conditionality; Additionality; Deforestation (computer science); Disbursement; Environmental resource management; Agricultural economics; Public economics; Ecosystem; Economics; Finance; Socioeconomics; Ecology","score_opus":0.13296546349643215,"score_gpt":0.2828587788122012,"score_spread":0.14989331531576902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018327237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904471,0.000026499549,0.0045684567,0.00032853996,0.00015730497,0.0027277,0.00009710164,0.000028414752,0.0016188937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525531,0.000031194704,0.04462689,0.00017946152,0.0000398804,0.0023573916,0.00013241966,0.00002368985,0.000055974408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794084,0.00003588981,0.0010755144,0.0005754355,0.000020863668,0.0003514638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999005,0.00008104846,0.0005239955,0.00024157096,0.000013172323,0.00013518662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090965314,0.00019088206,0.0005140993,0.00016007334,0.0000694007,0.00008819545,0.00025492493,0.00015134813,0.0002867884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019484612,0.00020774845,0.00009199403,0.00007517461,0.000025599236,0.0005178641,0.000078698744,0.000082386156,0.00014152759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037227837,0.0016990316,0.842177,0.00016706504,0.00008440184,4.284662e-7,0.00069078227,0.087331876,0.0001102547,0.048624083,0.000054066095,0.019023817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086861773,0.0007764667,0.767215,0.000013163669,0.000005996733,7.731e-7,0.0006556688,0.214953,0.00015332295,0.014704901,0.000397821,0.00025521853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012079809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032594957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12762113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006596505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021435178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84717363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019761781","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.014","title":"What will be the environmental effects of new free-floating car-sharing systems? The case of car2go in Ulm","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Transportation and Mobility Innovations","field":"Engineering","cited_by":489,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Point (geometry); Car ownership; Free riding; Environmental economics; Computer science; Transport engineering; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Public transport; Geography","score_opus":0.01999948077635889,"score_gpt":0.1930638476627719,"score_spread":0.17306436688641302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019761781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99864465,0.00013016404,0.00007612225,0.000048938236,0.00035491906,0.00029858286,0.00001704795,0.00001919235,0.00041038802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968153,0.00009629709,0.00010652946,0.000042911655,0.000019900428,0.00001923995,0.000004948795,0.0000075964113,0.00002106035],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994064,0.00001613992,0.00034978086,0.00009770124,0.000018604032,0.000111359914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994903,0.0001770824,0.00007020419,0.00023254409,0.000004438502,0.000025387339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016510129,0.0000786156,0.00015247244,0.000025577872,0.000033919605,0.000012619056,0.0001750507,0.000066906185,0.0000674421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026277801,0.00005404918,0.000043966116,0.00004932454,0.00006275024,0.00015212485,0.000027187658,0.000119296135,0.0000018920517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059122056,0.00068805966,0.20081294,0.0008712085,0.00051639846,0.0002351183,0.064611405,0.57213527,0.006951538,0.14275236,0.0004275311,0.009939064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023093764,0.0002924935,0.87082714,0.0001223805,0.00012474328,0.000113197304,0.03202044,0.075137764,0.013816964,0.0034229904,0.001249538,0.00056294637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031384305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014674836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6700142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062997984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009818418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22040614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021204141","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.013","title":"The Montreal Protocol's multilateral fund and sustainable development","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Sustainable development; Business; Investment (military); Kyoto Protocol; Productivity; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental economics; Climate change; Economics; Environmental science; Ozone layer; Economic growth; Political science; Ozone","score_opus":0.009002913476990372,"score_gpt":0.20366045820461856,"score_spread":0.1946575447276282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021204141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570566,0.00008741983,0.00015693782,0.00036718603,0.000114955226,0.008468924,0.0000010637124,0.00029768932,0.03344926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97848916,0.000097690085,0.0025210069,0.00007580874,0.00020192208,0.0144119635,0.0000017188162,0.000020349744,0.004180408],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935806,0.0000048068123,0.00017661802,0.00010946665,0.00001720117,0.00033385633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977285,0.000072224204,0.000013572654,0.00007944557,0.000010834539,0.000051077666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014537295,0.00011461562,0.00011672437,0.000017441955,0.00019076937,0.00006551034,0.00008450741,0.00005178296,0.00003384753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015147475,0.000078824065,0.000019438232,0.000019506246,0.00003207671,0.000070514434,0.000111870526,0.00009542799,0.000021698399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009672865,0.00016399061,0.014441456,0.0002501642,0.00035091268,0.00003866419,0.0013141064,0.37839687,0.0000145794675,0.0200532,0.017328665,0.56755066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029429919,0.000029227453,0.12530367,0.0000012690942,0.0000023518817,0.0000029225666,0.00008019291,0.04490679,0.00008203588,0.0002008427,0.82894653,0.0001498656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004725553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002917842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81161785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011197026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009999103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3214352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025951156","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.002","title":"An institutional framework for designing and monitoring ecosystem-based fisheries management policy experiments","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Business; Fisheries management; Livelihood; Environmental resource management; Process (computing); Sustainable management; Environmental economics; Economics; Fishing; Fishery; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.040840626707853434,"score_gpt":0.29163887274679456,"score_spread":0.25079824603894113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025951156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9289233,0.000004324399,0.013018402,0.00017777579,0.0001397506,0.00042572524,0.000007403066,0.000030577106,0.057272747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90835893,0.000029902636,0.091001205,0.00018980727,0.000063517946,0.00020364189,0.0000045839424,0.000008101673,0.00014032966],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916446,0.000042264728,0.00016438347,0.00029536797,0.000052986143,0.00028054748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958336,0.000098407225,0.000039601855,0.00014346658,0.0000037715686,0.00013136423],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024411685,0.000105202686,0.0001237503,0.000028527822,0.00027499904,0.00009886702,0.00014779605,0.00009059912,0.0014893884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008401,0.000099719786,0.000030683877,0.000055372275,0.00011223391,0.00020103327,0.00008993138,0.000077349345,0.000020875565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008549256,0.00030807083,0.8620672,0.000039626975,0.00003174898,0.000009844749,0.000114836635,0.005275088,0.00009313493,0.11210131,0.00010821081,0.019765396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031463273,0.0018820781,0.44076335,0.000027506345,0.000028568147,0.000016755232,0.0015514658,0.024145175,0.00592287,0.10017408,0.42093438,0.0014074473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019815807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015050892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4213039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029219323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002015447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030584440","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.014","title":"Understanding the heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas","keywords":"Mixed logit; Preference; Population; Constraint (computer-aided design); Quarter (Canadian coin); Fire protection; Economics; Geography; Public economics; Econometrics; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Microeconomics; Logistic regression; Engineering; Statistics; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.32320742510127143,"score_gpt":0.2597427725744224,"score_spread":0.06346465252684902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030584440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.952424,0.0000306783,0.028220443,0.00040523405,0.00022014874,0.00039161343,0.00004228225,0.000012175304,0.018253442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998485,0.000091257156,0.0007924736,0.0001631223,0.00007335747,0.00008619525,0.000025934307,0.000008471778,0.00027413724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990727,0.000021620988,0.00047480446,0.0002571325,0.0000101061205,0.00016369013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993703,0.0001004599,0.0003725709,0.00012946094,0.0000032634116,0.000023988416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007817459,0.00009368693,0.00024567722,0.00002934849,0.00018009442,0.000027997137,0.00018656238,0.00008876202,0.00031793973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022882388,0.00008538206,0.00014772438,0.000025475056,0.00009451917,0.00010173992,0.00006736037,0.000049118524,0.00007593456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019139972,0.00011198893,0.031278055,0.000028930952,0.00008559281,3.1379354e-8,0.00011963563,0.0022584144,0.0000013815924,0.96298987,0.00034291542,0.0027640737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070475787,0.00022456309,0.3398373,0.0000029265605,0.000017541464,4.7960253e-7,0.0002832045,0.023652563,0.000033483117,0.6295345,0.0055342973,0.00017440358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000290704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002063456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33345538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022024765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003352558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34817794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030774491","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.010","title":"Improved cooking stoves and firewood consumption: Quasi-experimental evidence from the Northern Peruvian Andes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad de Chile; International Development Research Centre; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Stove; Firewood; Consumption (sociology); Frame (networking); Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Agricultural economics; Economics; Computer science; Engineering; Waste management; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.023255509660486933,"score_gpt":0.21529439783048107,"score_spread":0.19203888816999415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030774491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976558,0.00026915382,0.0000241444,0.0009827646,0.00008238755,0.00026532312,0.000005167944,0.000026390313,0.0006888439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781966,0.0003750759,0.00031309432,0.0012030705,0.000057498946,0.00006475618,0.0000048120373,0.000008652545,0.00015339212],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991483,0.000056233046,0.00018079554,0.0003209172,0.000046729634,0.00024701934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921185,0.0003752052,0.00008205961,0.00020067292,0.0000013535176,0.00012887083],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013455174,0.00014894562,0.00014425129,0.0000049658706,0.00025780193,0.000103078164,0.0002132899,0.00009984128,0.012613201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051009312,0.0001008681,0.000040070296,0.000017413997,0.0004171928,0.00042657086,0.0002630503,0.00012456438,0.00076659606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025855154,0.00028836337,0.97947025,0.0000017147694,0.00002717657,0.0000020741777,0.00084339577,0.003173967,0.00715316,0.000056296565,0.00036358935,0.008594162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023467717,0.00025397385,0.9923591,0.0000060199545,0.000008080369,0.0000043581545,0.00026259146,0.004294971,0.0010740326,0.0003843137,0.0009373122,0.00018054582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066514505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012212043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012888879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016810047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046423647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033227688","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.003","title":"Motor vehicle insurance rating with pseudo emissions coverage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Automobile insurance; Business; Rating system; Actuarial science; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental economics","score_opus":0.010259517806127388,"score_gpt":0.20515518417550654,"score_spread":0.19489566636937916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033227688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96454245,0.000025053669,0.00011222045,0.00084576564,0.000055208042,0.000077868724,0.000025759431,0.00008256626,0.034233086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370563,0.00024171601,0.0018458832,0.0017743224,0.00016346916,0.000036817866,0.000023399876,0.000019184192,0.0021895976],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915725,0.00002398753,0.00026941116,0.0002487787,0.000043253836,0.00025733726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994703,0.000112265494,0.0001075192,0.00017840731,0.000008309116,0.00012318052],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007352523,0.00014291082,0.00018647703,0.000026155414,0.00016711123,0.000030370742,0.0001292012,0.00010437256,0.0011825563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021788637,0.000116296396,0.000058120695,0.000040964638,0.0000838678,0.00017577226,0.000016817687,0.00012719126,0.00019442324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008471564,0.00036330338,0.08077726,0.000008203462,0.000055167744,0.00001114592,0.00029701658,0.8061167,0.0016619503,0.10049736,0.00020819239,0.009918967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001243697,0.0002207306,0.83565235,0.0000075604316,0.000013648489,0.00000585036,0.00008343789,0.0067827534,0.0022495007,0.0017709802,0.15160285,0.0003666256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000059439604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092770887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.799334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009077955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022118333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033560226","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.020","title":"The transition to an oil contraction economy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Non-renewable resource; Minimax; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Resource (disambiguation); Shock (circulatory); Resource depletion; Normative; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Renewable energy","score_opus":0.014898021520965074,"score_gpt":0.26667623988867745,"score_spread":0.25177821836771236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033560226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85655063,0.000010992293,0.00034950642,0.0037494095,0.00020039947,0.000080055026,0.0000018522853,0.000059100315,0.13899808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966799,0.00003274167,0.0001399751,0.0018149465,0.00018951847,0.00003169346,0.000012069718,0.0000082754605,0.0010908602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988392,0.000083648236,0.00029251765,0.00027104095,0.000034085664,0.00047952184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900144,0.0003976004,0.000038038746,0.00024261836,0.0000750197,0.00024526624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012799727,0.0001037908,0.00013941631,0.00003647472,0.00037070148,0.00010628146,0.00022768328,0.00016518345,0.00032108556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018027965,0.000078261655,0.0000735471,0.00007151869,0.00009492033,0.00020596372,0.00003280768,0.00017690791,0.00021803395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004692289,0.00019332426,0.0001422491,0.000004107097,0.000022493576,0.000010711168,0.0001274836,0.06058953,0.000041878895,0.68893754,0.0001254243,0.249336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005347386,0.0005158694,0.017730197,0.0000010996223,0.0000064087685,0.000012325511,0.0013773185,0.005749838,0.00040737374,0.1327299,0.84068775,0.0002471965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026370582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008850099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8405623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004133663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054252745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49385625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033785671","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.017","title":"Participation in the world's first clean development mechanism forest project: The role of property rights, social capital and contractual rules","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Clean Development Mechanism; Additionality; Property rights; Incentive; Business; Social capital; Capital (architecture); Pooling; Natural resource economics; Economics; Public economics; Environmental resource management; Economic growth; Environmental economics; Climate change; Market economy; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.012983434646706695,"score_gpt":0.19841289502950063,"score_spread":0.18542946038279393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033785671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946087,0.0000016141728,0.0000030598353,0.0013632266,0.000037350124,0.0003880987,0.0000032872526,0.000006086749,0.0035885584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999439,0.000003196488,0.00014867236,0.00022212822,0.000024007679,0.000033895714,0.000004859651,0.0000016550665,0.00012257948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994882,0.000032569325,0.00015812798,0.00013781353,0.00005207819,0.00013122287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997461,0.00008861679,0.00007482722,0.00006983587,0.0000035133223,0.000017123317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034943235,0.00006711713,0.000080977705,0.00001652021,0.00034596154,0.00003477188,0.00018483067,0.00004505841,0.00030121513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017864975,0.000031492702,0.00002093035,0.000037311795,0.00023751438,0.000058205816,0.00016734173,0.00010134878,0.000031538442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005262987,0.00052491546,0.94863856,0.0000063093403,0.000023203193,0.000002051191,0.017434148,0.0001764719,0.00008210543,0.015695434,0.0003694688,0.01699468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017147654,0.000034157805,0.94500196,6.0283423e-7,0.0000066340062,3.9311323e-7,0.0013006983,0.000983313,0.000074231786,0.003912859,0.048449878,0.00006379388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045739053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11712303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11666564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050019207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010685872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8989872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036959197","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.001","title":"Industrial output restriction and the Kyoto protocol: An input–output approach with application to Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Greenhouse gas; Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Gross domestic product; Natural resource economics; Final demand; Environmental economics; Environmental science; Economy; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Ecology","score_opus":0.02009559283111716,"score_gpt":0.20835897948760934,"score_spread":0.18826338665649217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036959197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97536933,3.791301e-7,0.00030739786,0.0006541748,0.000019900977,0.018853685,0.00000506364,0.000019191324,0.0047708787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846083,0.0000027934611,0.0005635522,0.0008896295,0.000057529985,0.013606502,0.0000077689565,0.000008156208,0.00025574834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989891,0.0000944132,0.00021071074,0.00037037506,0.000092784685,0.00024262475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993861,0.000057284673,0.00008358481,0.00026406528,0.0000031739487,0.00020580817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031551745,0.00013604127,0.00016937539,0.00001159289,0.0003005061,0.000028520819,0.000193696,0.00010109727,0.000067928486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052509105,0.0000846502,0.00001929206,0.00008935084,0.00040174133,0.0001465058,0.00016926123,0.00017434178,0.000013316051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012702994,0.0005334498,0.924936,0.00000631735,0.000016061695,0.0000067250626,0.0005931056,0.053139865,0.000011811548,0.00071494473,0.0019468354,0.016824607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016833579,0.00043521228,0.9594615,5.197634e-7,0.000006711745,0.000020953596,0.0003736785,0.0052413037,0.000026287606,0.00043646162,0.032108314,0.00020568575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06359664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07553762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04789856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008889986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007153348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94263893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038335062","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.025","title":"A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":567,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptive management; Natural resource management; Livelihood; Complex adaptive system; Resilience (materials science); Ecosystem management; Process (computing); Enthusiasm; Perspective (graphical); Psychological resilience; Environmental resource management; Adaptive capacity; Resource management (computing); Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource; Socio-ecological system; Management science; Business; Ecology; Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Ecosystem; Climate change; Social psychology; Agriculture; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04388033897502572,"score_gpt":0.2593410575695124,"score_spread":0.2154607185944867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038335062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98398125,0.000008827461,0.001754118,0.000928846,0.00006421452,0.0008365944,0.000023156346,0.000031789026,0.012371231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92285025,0.00005798842,0.07427602,0.0023155974,0.00004810097,0.0000847395,0.00004314103,0.000009046698,0.00031511192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986569,0.00005331544,0.00034712936,0.0005288305,0.0000450322,0.00036876654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991203,0.0004762572,0.00018278272,0.0001572685,0.0000061045034,0.000057299574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070128794,0.00016708032,0.00024025059,0.000063229505,0.0003672364,0.000070508744,0.00024285376,0.00012952955,0.00043509036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023517037,0.00017241447,0.0001034276,0.00011914585,0.00034984102,0.000092254915,0.00030872234,0.0001351836,0.00004085243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008308054,0.00021139815,0.7778633,0.000020479025,0.000025525753,0.0000022202903,0.00014385204,0.20592356,0.0000041891167,0.010584477,0.00070014095,0.0044377353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007580669,0.00011751796,0.7469489,0.0000059242116,0.000018078512,2.5783817e-7,0.00031502577,0.22184399,0.0000040537,0.020044615,0.009764029,0.0001795432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000097748125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002416636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0725219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058193476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014392144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7030858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048009832","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.020","title":"Anomalies in green national accounting","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; Universitetet i Oslo","keywords":"National accounts; Accounting; Geography; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.024977638629000615,"score_gpt":0.20110380022578134,"score_spread":0.1761261615967807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048009832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77261454,0.0000017246193,0.000002129706,0.000108411885,0.000034887413,0.00006509787,0.000001070565,0.000013554317,0.22715858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996345,0.000013405727,0.0014096821,0.0009946622,0.000026312557,0.000020771055,0.0000036951778,0.000005754747,0.0011807211],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993103,0.00001299769,0.00017996388,0.00020149528,0.00004654742,0.00024869543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998233,0.000026830303,0.000046358327,0.000057849946,0.0000011892087,0.000044471664],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002238758,0.000085242624,0.00009281129,0.000032915897,0.00005616173,0.000010916749,0.00016747041,0.00006819756,0.011830841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028552973,0.00008158504,0.00002571509,0.000066343186,0.000117074145,0.00024893068,0.00024683733,0.00007098795,0.0014742048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108493,0.00010732871,0.9931761,0.0000013297472,0.000003211369,0.0000075024022,0.0003591925,0.0004733402,0.000017069908,0.0019346824,0.0003670497,0.0035423678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015684143,0.000021056347,0.97539455,4.929446e-7,7.3742444e-7,0.0000024148146,0.0001710335,0.00055802823,0.000053117255,0.018530989,0.0049921614,0.00011859055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003807608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048036178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22597785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051909784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000097092825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049345493","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.008","title":"Compensation for environmental services from artisanal fisheries in SE Brazil: Policy and technical strategies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Norsk institutt for naturforskning; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Artisanal fishing; Fishing; Livelihood; Business; Fishery; Environmental resource management; Payment; Government (linguistics); Environmental planning; Geography; Natural resource economics; Agriculture; Economics","score_opus":0.02326269068410361,"score_gpt":0.20580837604062446,"score_spread":0.18254568535652085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049345493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902232,0.0000069193266,0.00004586712,0.0004729356,0.000026268945,0.00022168153,0.00003823592,0.000019085914,0.008945783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973046,0.00005696021,0.0017764738,0.00068277854,0.000025970949,0.000015618229,0.0000378749,0.0000033133865,0.00009642054],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941254,0.00001823495,0.00015706095,0.00023709949,0.00002991638,0.00014515393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997547,0.000053561987,0.000058236605,0.000084292486,8.551818e-7,0.00004830786],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009177259,0.00008737962,0.00011157551,0.000025351981,0.00010348624,0.000044548666,0.00012788302,0.00007840497,0.0016140345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000064797605,0.00008150153,0.000028031083,0.000027971155,0.0002273923,0.0002139301,0.00024555146,0.00004725556,0.000050555296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043173364,0.000111034016,0.9964799,0.0000034075842,0.000006657129,0.0000013814246,0.00047399316,0.00019035478,0.00009773011,0.00039746944,0.00004147036,0.0021533938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003143584,0.00008443137,0.9836507,0.0000011172914,0.000007103578,7.586511e-7,0.0010329376,0.0013655057,0.000023634779,0.0071549364,0.0062611233,0.00010338659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001182131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075953216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012829228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015719625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000051326674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051200322","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.013","title":"Reassessing the costs of biological invasion: Mnemiopsis leidyi in the Black sea","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Anchovy; Fishery; Population; Ecology; Engraulis; Ecosystem; Bioeconomics; Biology; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.04909316167537908,"score_gpt":0.26209052525321724,"score_spread":0.21299736357783816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051200322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84076416,0.0000033811802,0.000014135946,0.0036238437,0.000026931268,0.00018852066,0.0000025728814,0.0000063965367,0.15537006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817616,0.00021073729,0.00024073427,0.0012460025,0.00003042564,0.000020621032,0.000004363578,0.000003446321,0.00006749973],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990439,0.0001384989,0.0002547352,0.00022578443,0.0000772185,0.00025985143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999215,0.00040702283,0.00006948884,0.00025948678,0.000004053848,0.00004493271],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008874692,0.00009033964,0.00015864563,0.000012589896,0.00010862098,0.00004067822,0.000596368,0.00011315624,0.0037705842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023456718,0.00004416992,0.000061762395,0.00015897701,0.00072679506,0.00009342173,0.00043710374,0.00025529726,0.00014635758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048023896,0.00035405133,0.96521986,0.000003141268,0.0000071194904,0.000020570138,0.00026240034,0.0040542767,0.00009988966,0.007846402,0.00072072906,0.021363515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004283372,0.00026715605,0.9692091,0.0000031900888,0.0000029531695,0.00001673629,0.0007258471,0.0007614061,0.00009731871,0.011288115,0.017065031,0.00013485707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004329806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011032277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15741201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024647044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022897912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063254755","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.014","title":"Performance of an agro-forestry based Payments-for-Environmental-Services project in Mozambique: A household level analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; International Development Research Centre; World Bank Group","keywords":"Payment; Business; Consumption (sociology); Household income; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Propensity score matching; Cash; Impact evaluation; Distribution (mathematics); Scale (ratio); Natural resource economics; Socioeconomics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.056967139625171616,"score_gpt":0.2025208703582284,"score_spread":0.1455537307330568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063254755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99711025,0.0000029525097,0.00002814459,0.000028084569,0.00002740905,0.0004028429,0.000087340864,0.00001742078,0.0022955511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967864,0.00004164659,0.0024857528,0.00037339702,0.000007233749,0.00003867961,0.000062950305,0.0000059240024,0.00019802939],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990046,0.00003740314,0.00030560553,0.00035488306,0.000069084635,0.00022844385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994967,0.000029357187,0.00016618695,0.0002472914,0.000002014315,0.00005844674],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031854567,0.00013497252,0.00022650148,0.000109053806,0.00009435352,0.000013777331,0.00035648028,0.00010195979,0.00093038165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000029547953,0.00011977457,0.000107398686,0.00017101575,0.00015053905,0.00018210424,0.00021229796,0.00006421782,0.000020159297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084841326,0.00046440854,0.9827901,0.000016201056,0.000042197236,0.0000014060448,0.00020481714,0.01493498,0.000034249813,0.0000038315147,0.000008522874,0.0014144329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004941426,0.00025483902,0.91664714,0.0000020448133,0.00007095749,1.7385092e-7,0.0002855577,0.08134192,0.00019462155,0.000032971093,0.0005282295,0.00014740492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005705806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016267513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06640694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021791074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008995004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066555278","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.007","title":"The ‘neighbor effect’: Simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":287,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Discrete choice; Scrutiny; Market penetration; Preference; Alternative fuel vehicle; Consumer behaviour; Theory of planned behavior; Marketing; Economics; Driving range; Electric vehicle; Environmental economics; Business; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Engineering; Control (management)","score_opus":0.019192691490069243,"score_gpt":0.2299593888287355,"score_spread":0.21076669733866626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066555278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99427676,0.00015160574,0.00009798008,0.0006114825,0.00012815162,0.00024081617,0.000011706253,0.0001327484,0.004348763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764365,0.0010218157,0.0005233507,0.00012371408,0.000035097386,0.00010207321,0.000024201743,0.000014046623,0.0005120756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990265,0.000030985757,0.00034262033,0.00024386219,0.00003435548,0.00032167454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983122,0.0013368999,0.0001171267,0.00018452664,0.000007660528,0.000041583928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015181057,0.00015059498,0.00022937091,0.000039689523,0.00026769185,0.000026126743,0.0002375306,0.00018864303,0.000042705768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002013895,0.000105309846,0.00007915403,0.000059218106,0.0002590891,0.00008452915,0.00003241766,0.00013774891,0.000025884094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013896757,0.00011720497,0.36540073,0.000015520722,0.000072123694,0.0000058483297,0.00020479773,0.26844716,0.000036276542,0.31649396,0.00017528237,0.04889216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036039068,0.0007859824,0.65732497,0.000014492984,0.00004083623,0.000005931723,0.0011168197,0.15473092,0.0022340016,0.11902909,0.06036706,0.0007459951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025605445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010970445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29192424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015722879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032423934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6121766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206838067","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.009","title":"The Kenneth E. Boulding Memorial Award 2014","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Ecological economics; Presentation (obstetrics); Principal (computer security); Environmental ethics; Economic history; Economics; History; Ecology; Art history; Philosophy; Sustainability; Biology","score_opus":0.006188188358804333,"score_gpt":0.20655422753668803,"score_spread":0.2003660391778837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W206838067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633025,0.000009954416,0.00010487779,0.0015603228,0.0005794976,0.00016913757,0.0000016845671,0.000033691922,0.034238346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975366,0.00011978917,0.00031944382,0.00076465536,0.00020694561,0.000018036311,0.0000023930245,0.000008840866,0.0010232753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890655,0.00010800116,0.00022981632,0.00028566545,0.000060887258,0.00040910405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913377,0.0003417209,0.000076953685,0.00029948633,0.0000014787652,0.00014662038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095255865,0.00012762396,0.00014833895,0.0000058722735,0.00043017018,0.00007745288,0.00034969818,0.00010906154,0.002690085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025322783,0.00008390829,0.00008715663,0.000028490611,0.0004428978,0.00014337158,0.0003540422,0.00016608578,0.0016578644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027002714,0.0006715615,0.69333583,0.000010904015,0.00005757015,0.000007723446,0.00035328604,0.04000828,0.0008236667,0.02420264,0.1137613,0.12649722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035920646,0.00023519252,0.48084006,4.5117818e-7,0.000007470334,0.000003442082,0.00009867324,0.0070775966,0.00030709078,0.031401828,0.47944146,0.00022752573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043806664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001778189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36568016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005008792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060453563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069206726","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.005","title":"An analysis of a brownlash report","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.06323992382721443,"score_gpt":0.25453840736531574,"score_spread":0.1912984835381013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069206726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94385797,0.000097424076,0.0005064951,0.0003135926,0.0002608433,0.00012751817,0.00059157604,0.00005303378,0.054191556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733174,0.00012403837,0.0010768124,0.00035464572,0.00019314654,0.000025266707,0.00037389045,0.000020573982,0.00049986324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975276,0.0000140565635,0.0014409198,0.00061118335,0.000012676822,0.00039357363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982393,0.000105672334,0.00089126034,0.0006241945,0.000024671152,0.00011495197],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007053097,0.00019324008,0.0009716436,0.00052471535,0.00008108526,0.00006516765,0.00034592047,0.00023312899,0.002912076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007583414,0.00022985556,0.00040402298,0.0003414187,0.00012720485,0.0002728194,0.000075409436,0.000112043126,0.0003112768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018441773,0.00044114108,0.47627124,0.000008153671,0.00027940838,0.000012285311,0.00006501778,0.017263243,0.000014237271,0.5052308,0.00030742114,0.00008860107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042777185,0.00014798339,0.820425,0.0000013487678,0.000115004514,0.000014603226,0.00006994304,0.05913944,0.0000796087,0.10212196,0.01701567,0.00044169577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010131897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017782012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40310887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020644016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017142082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99799937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073988666","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.017","title":"Managing invasive species: Rules of thumb for rapid assessment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Rule of thumb; Damages; Usability; Control (management); Invasive species; Balance (ability); Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental resource management; Computer science; Business; Management science; Environmental planning; Ecology; Economics; Biology; Political science; Geography; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.019560025083145832,"score_gpt":0.24464689795352307,"score_spread":0.22508687287037724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073988666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90962017,0.000017124672,0.0012353193,0.002231769,0.00010921751,0.00025671822,0.000019165383,0.000016979082,0.086493544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97971463,0.00040526467,0.017898872,0.0007987393,0.00004819718,0.00005981033,0.0000103923385,0.0000053580425,0.0010587375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993172,0.00002120552,0.0002491254,0.00020509386,0.000024890764,0.00018244129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992839,0.00043725138,0.00013706577,0.00010038495,0.0000066297152,0.000034750585],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002540691,0.00008720563,0.00019012201,0.000018819368,0.00013527488,0.000008684241,0.00016036529,0.00006783085,0.0029983157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062275416,0.00007745633,0.00007553502,0.000020230924,0.00022087149,0.000107472246,0.00015312167,0.000062082014,0.00015948794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009042412,0.0010700998,0.44021028,0.00005629407,0.00025754957,0.000002941626,0.0010326724,0.21971478,0.000684385,0.29371464,0.008277503,0.03488843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006196669,0.00030683592,0.88064307,0.000003003307,0.00002167206,0.0000015951539,0.0002978989,0.03691662,0.00024852,0.060652602,0.020085365,0.00020314401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000023257705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046196466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44043282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021467362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011971737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99791306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076715122","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.006","title":"A Box-Cox Double-Hurdle model of wildlife valuation: The citizen's perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Wildlife; Contingent valuation; Valuation (finance); Payment; Willingness to pay; Actuarial science; Wildlife conservation; Preference elicitation; Public economics; Preference; Economics; Public good; Marketing; Business; Microeconomics; Computer science; Ecology; Finance","score_opus":0.14022959396312548,"score_gpt":0.23884079330361607,"score_spread":0.09861119934049059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076715122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9189562,0.00030736427,0.0032077283,0.007718472,0.00020014505,0.0004343737,0.00010722077,0.000032254055,0.06903623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929082,0.0004121623,0.002765717,0.002187706,0.00021713332,0.00008459586,0.0000186693,0.000022317157,0.0013834969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829876,0.000021324178,0.00086348836,0.0004902829,0.000027085083,0.0002990669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883324,0.000114268,0.0005524991,0.00039134614,0.000023626013,0.00008500147],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009394061,0.0001939998,0.00045395573,0.00008343939,0.00017065139,0.000047414676,0.0003700072,0.0001755675,0.0018568609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066904504,0.00018033275,0.00021765674,0.000067663255,0.00022568992,0.00033994383,0.00013183063,0.00018660401,0.0013234643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003989242,0.00018700182,0.012861938,0.000003445355,0.00006271035,1.3380296e-7,0.0005945337,0.2118067,0.000008366391,0.7731647,0.0008737557,0.00039681487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025872996,0.00021103924,0.06257793,0.0000043905957,0.000029446906,0.0000050975746,0.0008270452,0.48320785,0.00023229809,0.44229403,0.007496932,0.00052661926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004947203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006492999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33087066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007216783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042176114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079562420","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.008","title":"Insiders, outsiders, and the adaptability of informal rules to ecological shocks","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptability; Economics; Ecology; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental ethics; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02751647765112415,"score_gpt":0.24708302807042348,"score_spread":0.21956655041929934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079562420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89354867,0.00006469677,0.0000099129975,0.01031459,0.00017065645,0.0006853219,0.000006900644,0.00003436247,0.09516487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558944,0.00053219113,0.0010966283,0.0021133567,0.00009394437,0.000119788456,0.0000024658,0.000003314647,0.0004488562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873537,0.000118864235,0.00047503857,0.00025419024,0.000059826933,0.00035668726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986267,0.0008579075,0.00014329479,0.00013459433,0.00007408033,0.00016339653],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009965008,0.00013991287,0.00041758252,0.0000308978,0.0005445165,0.00010392671,0.0002575816,0.00017150826,0.0014113878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001037411,0.00008767893,0.00009504425,0.000056745343,0.0011595729,0.00026171457,0.00030754023,0.00013730752,0.0001634267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017412553,0.00030104737,0.41771597,0.000018236296,0.0001697382,0.0000013328917,0.02582794,0.00023436101,0.0000017341713,0.526133,0.0145583935,0.014864114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000577629,0.00008381349,0.90181917,0.0000018490409,0.000008732685,6.6061415e-7,0.016667284,0.00006681578,0.0000035224562,0.031739492,0.048862934,0.00016807883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075635087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067176856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49439353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009653711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010704933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087206104","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.018","title":"Economic incentives and natural resource management among small-scale farmers: Addressing the missing link","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Transaction cost; Natural resource management; Natural resource; Resource management (computing); Business; Scale (ratio); Resource (disambiguation); Investment (military); Economics; Incentive program; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.015231045653850094,"score_gpt":0.20134228138019755,"score_spread":0.18611123572634747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087206104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98834664,0.00018397297,0.0000047416834,0.005199243,0.00017133831,0.00023779136,0.0000046123428,0.000056940647,0.0057947077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764925,0.00032158993,0.00025266391,0.00077035354,0.00041551038,0.000014780377,0.000016913327,0.0000012957275,0.0005576661],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987239,0.00012657499,0.0002744219,0.0004551388,0.000042338794,0.00037758448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992043,0.0004245775,0.00015864996,0.000076486554,0.000010872509,0.000125121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035748296,0.00019361942,0.00022320819,0.000008499405,0.0006902075,0.0002530909,0.00039380774,0.0001259013,0.00010273686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024838886,0.00005975222,0.000098100434,0.000058479684,0.0003624407,0.00014426779,0.00030985396,0.00022729262,0.000036856385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000485822,0.00006532896,0.10073981,0.000013334129,0.000036267145,0.000003883077,0.00018920848,0.0006642898,0.0013423424,0.0031848634,0.00048578603,0.8932263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013187554,0.00008843978,0.9609846,0.000016651238,0.00001602392,0.0000068743216,0.000998319,0.0020549856,0.00016706239,0.001180654,0.03412538,0.00022914977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043246455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006805113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89299715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006896242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030006124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5308588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090017401","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.014","title":"Do conservation auctions crowd out voluntary environmentally friendly activities?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Alberta Water Research Institute","keywords":"Common value auction; Crowding out; Incentive; Crowding; Turnover; Business; Public economics; Crowdsourcing; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Microeconomics; Social preferences; Marketing; Environmental economics; Psychology; Political science; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.031094072854394302,"score_gpt":0.2907493542294987,"score_spread":0.2596552813751044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090017401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90301025,0.000023589497,0.00007426186,0.002510658,0.0008689167,0.000261375,0.000025174599,0.000092645016,0.09313311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948446,0.00022561675,0.0012879531,0.0013394831,0.00030636176,0.00009206484,0.000019051948,0.00001515392,0.0018697107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987056,0.00013111722,0.00032385183,0.00039010216,0.0000610449,0.00038828354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922985,0.00025143457,0.00016688506,0.00019373602,0.00001032439,0.00014777969],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047293134,0.00016476774,0.0002657938,0.00004620121,0.00087414606,0.00012742869,0.0002596148,0.0001792476,0.0018465107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083842526,0.00018232645,0.000111659036,0.000031257954,0.00070058345,0.0004519295,0.00016128078,0.00016097439,0.0005324584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010669329,0.0013485046,0.5080363,0.000009493718,0.0001603609,0.0000053806143,0.012431472,0.00074736745,0.00146043,0.4441801,0.017775813,0.013738074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011267852,0.00067769486,0.19037609,0.00000756002,0.00005680195,0.000003204187,0.019788887,0.0006371858,0.0009114197,0.022733388,0.7626543,0.0010266709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055000687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054747784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74487853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008704965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060896324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090787680","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.003","title":"What matters and why? Ecosystem services and their bundled qualities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Valuation (finance); Function (biology); Environmental resource management; Business; Production (economics); Marketing; Ecosystem; Sociology; Economics; Ecology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.00916344558941495,"score_gpt":0.1819763894997342,"score_spread":0.17281294391031923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090787680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959127,0.00007946619,0.000007774225,0.0020726838,0.00029088103,0.0001258449,0.000008369117,0.00003527727,0.0014670409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99352884,0.00054164167,0.00006196447,0.0057098838,0.00006990934,0.000016098838,0.000005793395,0.000008033928,0.000057827914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991153,0.000075328106,0.00022733588,0.00032313814,0.000026635507,0.00023230337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944186,0.00018669598,0.0000953765,0.00015161108,0.0000023101904,0.00012216214],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036630794,0.0001515717,0.00026128694,0.000015039245,0.00014449272,0.00028533727,0.00015967934,0.000101114485,0.0009576376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000031194559,0.00010190466,0.000029756633,0.00002142068,0.00003162944,0.00063724804,0.00025574933,0.000054638964,0.00034176544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015875604,0.00037259347,0.950957,0.0012460289,0.00022471066,0.0000077905215,0.010005346,0.0049201623,0.00038791803,0.0060314527,0.0029311,0.022757137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021286162,0.00076989643,0.42074028,0.00015636311,0.00005032281,0.00010819007,0.015425128,0.16132857,0.00038400528,0.031545844,0.36584964,0.0015131698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000110949215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073956475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53021675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004515187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000013604051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099647677","doi":"10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00149-x","title":"SPECIAL SECTION: LAND USE OPTIONS IN DRY TROPICAL WOODLAND ECOSYSTEMS IN ZIMBABWE","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland; Carbon sequestration; Firewood; Ecosystem services; Agroforestry; Agriculture; Natural resource economics; Incentive; Land use; Ecosystem; Agricultural land; Geography; Environmental science; Agricultural economics; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.016966051642827065,"score_gpt":0.1808434492194427,"score_spread":0.16387739757661562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099647677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97497576,0.0000026552393,0.0000027301126,0.0005277912,0.00035361463,0.00020056865,0.000008369208,0.000016315473,0.023912165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99538803,0.00017757626,0.00015886629,0.00037992926,0.00078715064,0.000013953764,0.0000121448065,0.0000038883663,0.0030784514],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999202,0.000059173766,0.00022617448,0.00026991247,0.00004245815,0.00020025765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973434,0.000058937698,0.00003282206,0.000111004476,0.0000014588301,0.000061407685],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012590381,0.00008874782,0.0001448107,0.000045780234,0.00009271799,0.00005546474,0.000130472,0.00010937393,0.016693743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013649257,0.00008219925,0.00004282192,0.00010875286,0.00007472073,0.00014174514,0.00009911008,0.00012656607,0.0007675227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002994974,0.00015081864,0.98143804,0.0000014232724,0.0000029091962,0.000011769588,0.0000886763,0.016000308,6.463629e-7,0.000028408527,0.0009927442,0.0012543338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000510499,0.000040147934,0.7755286,0.0000016340292,0.0000022364852,0.0000013037812,0.000045386594,0.0023658117,2.6543344e-7,0.000098438584,0.2213196,0.000086067565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006396297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052930012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22032686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004096195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060351385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9865208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099985860","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.021","title":"An integrated decision-support approach in prioritizing risks of non-indigenous species in the face of high uncertainty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Australian Government","keywords":"Negotiation; Risk analysis (engineering); Process (computing); Indigenous; Prioritization; Risk management; Risk assessment; Uncertainty; Computer science; Decision support system; Management science; Environmental resource management; Business; Ecology; Economics; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04756225558100446,"score_gpt":0.2666782392646889,"score_spread":0.21911598368368446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099985860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895086,0.000005022228,0.0006844751,0.00001685044,0.000056664103,0.00028688138,0.000012699516,0.0000050569947,0.009423698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931179,0.00008620471,0.0066410997,0.00009053996,0.0000045970996,0.000024716564,0.000009636628,0.0000038266458,0.000021426444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989812,0.00008766238,0.00044921186,0.00023393071,0.000044216235,0.00020382587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993453,0.00026627423,0.0001732466,0.00018075449,0.000007990607,0.000026407477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007830648,0.0001041702,0.0002887812,0.00004923793,0.00005947349,0.000004995346,0.00038485412,0.00013216466,0.00045717056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006820689,0.000073056064,0.00004107295,0.00014396275,0.00035332536,0.00010664042,0.0001055787,0.00018393729,0.000021515238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063094485,0.0007619536,0.9298903,0.0000046602054,0.000009716662,0.000005881847,0.009576159,0.055458244,0.000029817435,0.0011775757,0.000013676753,0.003008961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029023952,0.00029639338,0.98044115,0.0000022072807,0.000004190894,0.0000023323475,0.004338122,0.010284298,0.000027936116,0.004207406,0.000023375887,0.000082370956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007886468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009905411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050550867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015154715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022268145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55274516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116649276","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.003","title":"Shadow prices of environmental outputs and production efficiency of household-level paper recycling units in Vietnam","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow price; Production (economics); Economics; Shadow (psychology); Capital (architecture); Environmental pollution; Pollution; Estimation; Environmental quality; Natural resource economics; Production function; Function (biology); Econometrics; Agricultural economics; Environmental science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Environmental protection; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.04324630514072446,"score_gpt":0.20036419490616736,"score_spread":0.1571178897654429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116649276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99315655,0.0006280808,0.00024641908,0.00016473304,0.0003065314,0.00028649258,0.00014162746,0.0000144720625,0.005055089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963774,0.0016966388,0.0015537711,0.00011607032,0.00006136368,0.000012022143,0.0000135921655,0.000026228801,0.0001429143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997525,0.000017472335,0.0014168643,0.000642605,0.000023232575,0.00037487815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985371,0.00014834756,0.0008969791,0.00031803324,0.0000047585754,0.00009476141],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015023388,0.00021082538,0.0006369756,0.00028645454,0.000053572785,0.000013930455,0.0002403468,0.00023393883,0.00021931072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001915724,0.0002475782,0.000075953336,0.00013982784,0.0002654942,0.00030939962,0.000162566,0.00018895211,0.000029831333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008881215,0.0009345897,0.9147696,0.00006321872,0.00006040219,0.0000036851843,0.00050554844,0.0075690597,0.0017432262,0.070155144,0.000022553984,0.004084156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007334901,0.00019613738,0.9861454,0.000011895638,0.000006098074,0.0000053551375,0.00025107447,0.00053365674,0.0019362962,0.008527583,0.0013503432,0.00030266328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043926426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017444359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0713758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028784177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014102385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118181057","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.001","title":"Strategic importance of green water in international crop trade","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundación Caja Madrid","keywords":"Virtual water; Commodity; Grain trade; Water resources; International trade and water; Water use; Water security; Business; Water trading; Water conservation; Productivity; Food security; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Water scarcity; International trade; Economics; Agriculture; Trade barrier; Agronomy; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.014515219588508394,"score_gpt":0.22876782305413298,"score_spread":0.21425260346562458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118181057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726094,0.0000027496071,0.0000015498052,0.0017241809,0.000037464146,0.000102888225,0.0000037727427,0.0000073150154,0.02551065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989371,0.000015941447,0.00018287785,0.0006363809,0.000013917133,0.00000304627,0.000007360336,0.0000025488957,0.00020084929],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927986,0.000019285053,0.00026430163,0.00019169487,0.000041316867,0.0002035608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976766,0.000014422228,0.00004575806,0.00011590945,6.044997e-7,0.00005566904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018768206,0.00008133683,0.00013393031,0.000014763007,0.0000188555,0.0000088657225,0.00019930079,0.000072943265,0.006216576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008475513,0.000060366052,0.000046960195,0.000024601495,0.0001349924,0.00015629859,0.00006930901,0.000090369256,0.00006812229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039244773,0.0006440208,0.98705566,0.0000019387096,0.0000041864128,0.00001580103,0.000263302,0.0068011847,0.0018029739,0.0011084818,0.000039867682,0.0022233273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023671368,0.00014307785,0.9642902,4.802428e-7,0.0000012405332,0.0000023942798,0.00012248117,0.0011382509,0.00082401466,0.032779895,0.00037585458,0.000085388965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006157025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003141045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031671412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038477132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003835121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99469185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129380331","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.011","title":"Constant per capita consumption paths with exhaustible resources and decaying produced capital","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Per capita; Consumption (sociology); Capital (architecture); Constant (computer programming); Population growth; Growth model; Technical progress; Natural resource economics; Capital accumulation; Population; Agricultural economics; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.02586341947580234,"score_gpt":0.20141741231675897,"score_spread":0.17555399284095663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129380331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800133,0.0010302998,0.00024584166,0.0011123247,0.00020121978,0.00037282272,0.00010071773,0.00008080274,0.016842643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645203,0.00088101183,0.0012580805,0.00079099974,0.00012542856,0.000025764415,0.00001605857,0.000022244403,0.00042840416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802184,0.000016491587,0.0006736818,0.00078910333,0.000015306157,0.00048358232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896646,0.00010282191,0.00037441446,0.00033996592,0.000022950899,0.00019337915],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053219125,0.00027426326,0.0006153201,0.00012868858,0.00023924424,0.00019224161,0.00020293215,0.00019277763,0.0010009392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034048466,0.00026530845,0.000078683624,0.00003226155,0.00024342356,0.00036023965,0.00007464288,0.00021299024,0.0004885639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001212863,0.00014661103,0.054988034,0.000016324537,0.000055186505,0.000009249021,0.0009179564,0.00070380827,0.00004775983,0.9417312,0.0001262989,0.0011362422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005990422,0.0031508093,0.362945,0.000045138335,0.000068613546,0.00027436743,0.0021323552,0.006929001,0.0005224848,0.5772583,0.03788324,0.0028003212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003353419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061221945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.364473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017528904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002798144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131356814","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.014","title":"Niche construction, co-evolution and biodiversity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Royal Society","keywords":"Niche; Niche construction; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Trophic level; Ecological niche; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Function (biology); Functional ecology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecosystem services; Environmental niche modelling; Biology; Environmental science; Computer science; Evolutionary biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.013355962108916012,"score_gpt":0.18994256563086612,"score_spread":0.1765866035219501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131356814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985051,0.000011252676,0.00013336686,0.000504952,0.00010240386,0.000064721164,0.0000070443493,0.000026293374,0.014098966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799055,0.00024351531,0.0011279043,0.00039876314,0.000010222675,0.0000038315547,0.0000042302313,0.0000010804595,0.00021992098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995705,0.000021698312,0.00009826928,0.00017737778,0.000016301476,0.00011588225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997847,0.00006506545,0.00004912108,0.000052606716,0.00000342116,0.000045066634],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000083782725,0.000059031205,0.00009379617,0.000012256673,0.00041893724,0.00000411944,0.00005374915,0.00008273,0.00107898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034759687,0.00005598007,0.000021081883,0.000025937965,0.0007578225,0.00009711258,0.00009831588,0.00006980578,0.00073459494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054619686,0.000025711912,0.99578565,4.8643795e-7,0.000006577902,0.0000020570726,0.000051767896,0.00049247366,0.000006875697,0.0021197302,0.0013880096,0.000115222334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018471123,0.000049569444,0.99229866,1.2764299e-7,0.000004001042,0.000036908816,0.000059894875,0.0009798622,0.000008073752,0.0039799428,0.0023258412,0.0000724319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017422753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018809302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013879044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013626475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005904434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132102506","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.001","title":"Trade-offs between conservation and socio-economic objectives in managing a tropical marine ecosystem","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Fishing; Business; Ecosystem services; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Fisheries management; Ecosystem; Marine conservation; Marine ecosystem; Fishery; Economics; Geography; Ecology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.017759539222164344,"score_gpt":0.23828804393396613,"score_spread":0.2205285047118018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132102506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90659434,0.0000014904484,0.00006808476,0.0015564224,0.00004322772,0.00020708037,0.000004806931,0.000019651026,0.0915049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890447,0.000068690046,0.00046379643,0.00026134963,0.0000747502,0.000013132124,0.000008518818,0.00000824666,0.00019707168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886936,0.000049080023,0.0003464077,0.00034682357,0.00003869904,0.00034961774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940753,0.00029645185,0.0000651792,0.00011292938,0.0000011283,0.000116770745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050986,0.00011473175,0.00023840417,0.000046511715,0.00008256629,0.00004375578,0.00014988307,0.00013235376,0.0030968885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033886503,0.000110846995,0.000038022667,0.00005041332,0.00015512988,0.00019065557,0.00038559653,0.00020141086,0.000093407405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029252496,0.000026486458,0.96827596,0.0000052192127,0.000006878114,0.000008803864,0.00006484505,0.000051337684,0.0000042642255,0.0011893279,0.00006030415,0.030277334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039944335,0.00010864838,0.9809292,8.4221205e-7,0.0000026739904,0.0000050075273,0.00019477356,0.0034085314,0.000011238233,0.003944418,0.010865069,0.00013016122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003034548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056881984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09231011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006059978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012330117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138920617","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.024","title":"There is no silver bullet: The value of diversification in planning invasive species surveillance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Ontario Forest Research Institute; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Portfolio; Business; Expert elicitation; Silver bullet; PEST analysis; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geography; Finance; Marketing","score_opus":0.013458171360528516,"score_gpt":0.19274197097376145,"score_spread":0.17928379961323293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138920617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93023515,0.0000068544055,0.000029206936,0.0007023844,0.0001220649,0.00015156808,0.0000035831656,0.0000074092154,0.06874178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777347,0.000067782,0.00011655902,0.0012873523,0.000021435562,0.000012586197,0.0000031179538,0.0000031249212,0.0007145817],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939257,0.00007028579,0.00017036936,0.00018557378,0.000032310923,0.0001488643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937123,0.0003283405,0.00010964698,0.00016628375,0.000003795725,0.00002070228],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040428128,0.000072162366,0.00012500782,0.000013950579,0.00007818156,0.00000928086,0.00027214183,0.00007105395,0.0045229006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115488176,0.00005174887,0.000035721943,0.00004873168,0.00023352478,0.000058571888,0.00021107274,0.00008560323,0.0008241205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003054715,0.000092810275,0.93108284,0.0000052341134,0.000012445972,0.0000015132896,0.00042059793,0.045953322,0.0001300559,0.01551802,0.006496535,0.00025608728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016756267,0.00009131297,0.9706527,0.0000016531154,0.0000019804372,4.121405e-7,0.00012829438,0.0025534404,0.00007159737,0.003178494,0.023085086,0.00006747718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007349188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050067663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0680272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011083519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045224383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142411771","doi":"10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00199-3","title":"The Kyoto protocol and payments for tropical forest:","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Tinker Foundation; U.S. Department of Energy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Tropical forest; Carbon sequestration; Carbon sink; Clean Development Mechanism; Ecosystem services; Carbon market; Reforestation; Payment; Payment for ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Order (exchange); Carbon offset; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Climate change; Business; Ecology; Economics; Agroforestry; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.0122050456620408,"score_gpt":0.2419552346378949,"score_spread":0.22975018897585409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142411771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9154611,9.4088705e-7,0.000006523912,0.001509012,0.000032997643,0.02090025,0.0000033636165,0.00002190731,0.06206389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77949697,0.00008666926,0.0018144564,0.004319233,0.00031288122,0.14290892,0.000007820858,0.000028402288,0.07102466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940735,0.000014781141,0.00014350271,0.00017588538,0.000024313676,0.00023418789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996903,0.00010010791,0.000030157387,0.00011384114,8.691509e-7,0.00006472042],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000102401085,0.00007748377,0.00007827,0.000004652163,0.00023046526,0.00006205445,0.00017101046,0.000048843292,0.0060536438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000199055,0.000047728456,0.0000374985,0.000020456268,0.00018458847,0.0000770193,0.000093923874,0.000045152086,0.00095751864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005035235,0.00027751815,0.58911526,0.000014838803,0.000032914682,0.000002479648,0.00008281681,0.0035017454,0.0000032620712,0.049034964,0.10354124,0.2538894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038622625,0.00015967088,0.3013596,3.4720915e-7,0.0000022436202,5.751894e-7,0.0000015402563,0.005387378,0.0000016049204,0.00939407,0.6832477,0.00005907511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012457313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022207438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57970643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055093435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002702563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146904012","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.031","title":"Prosocial behavior and incentives: Evidence from field experiments in rural Mexico and Tanzania","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"World Agroforestry Centre; Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Michigan State University; United States Agency for International Development; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Incentive; Prosocial behavior; Payment; Public economics; Tanzania; Distrust; Premise; Economics; Business; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.08386047576948277,"score_gpt":0.334920429353972,"score_spread":0.2510599535844892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146904012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925117,0.00050190894,8.486934e-7,0.00025189706,0.0002576904,0.00044977915,0.000010495086,0.000029036,0.0059866845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973894,0.0011490807,0.0008861071,0.00028317078,0.000060413342,0.00016197683,0.0000016325887,0.0000075841704,0.000060680577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989361,0.00008831822,0.00028898567,0.0003414743,0.000039048413,0.00030605827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994691,0.0001987128,0.00010399319,0.00008974578,0.000012762051,0.00012569013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024685563,0.00014224077,0.0002730848,0.000034923014,0.00027053585,0.000071152455,0.00017791927,0.00017848617,0.00042720177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011464596,0.00014695394,0.000035288478,0.00003682932,0.00047492955,0.00045675557,0.00027831583,0.0001324964,0.000020471201],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005325216,0.000173186,0.97351956,9.58126e-7,0.000008092652,0.0000064045794,0.020320674,7.808672e-8,0.0003039939,0.003554607,0.00003587424,0.00202334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048657975,0.00023985098,0.9722819,0.000018656718,0.00001423039,5.001732e-7,0.020224845,0.000011755838,0.0025587385,0.0037583476,0.00013300282,0.00027162462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061251945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008278942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059260037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025777833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000433158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9259502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190523531","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.012","title":"Opening the black box of energy throughputs in farm systems: A decomposition analysis between the energy returns to external inputs, internal biomass reuses and total inputs consumed (the Vallès County, Catalonia, c.1860 and 1999)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Work (physics); Agriculture; Environmental science; Production (economics); Sustainability; Agricultural engineering; Agricultural science; Energy (signal processing); Environmental economics; Business; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics; Geography; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.013840721159843512,"score_gpt":0.23722186642116458,"score_spread":0.22338114526132108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190523531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997299,0.00014532714,0.0004648918,0.0014262715,0.000055920566,0.00027120506,0.000041869844,0.000008362649,0.00028713024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991584,0.00006376822,0.00009376311,0.0005107998,0.00004711714,0.00004548977,0.000019414032,0.0000070494275,0.000054243344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846035,0.00026845618,0.00045979652,0.00038001093,0.00013426413,0.0002971244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898076,0.00035267434,0.00021710206,0.00027816114,0.000009066964,0.00016225452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000756794,0.00020268014,0.0003694105,0.000038441263,0.00016259552,0.00014051826,0.00042705162,0.00012672301,0.00004632084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006651562,0.00010373306,0.00007331035,0.00020148854,0.00076248567,0.00020666177,0.0008835963,0.0001571205,0.0000056405997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012713867,0.00014698973,0.95977795,0.000010767372,0.00025275056,0.000015118246,0.0022634042,0.034643903,0.00057814736,0.0004522675,0.00022202526,0.0015095348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004079874,0.00027838963,0.9900978,0.000011274357,0.00014132721,0.000053083528,0.0012847444,0.004511305,0.00044408598,0.00089546805,0.0016584957,0.00021599224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009387069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00817131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030319894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005668655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016436172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195198209","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.007","title":"Debunking trickle-down ecosystem services: The fallacy of omnipotent, homogeneous beneficiaries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Business; Stakeholder; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Service (business); Goods and services; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem management; Environmental economics; Economics; Marketing; Ecology","score_opus":0.01783953341147444,"score_gpt":0.19650815918543815,"score_spread":0.17866862577396372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195198209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904367,0.00013847595,0.00001896124,0.00032959742,0.00032271902,0.0002632056,0.000027018512,0.000044500357,0.008418848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991375,0.000082103514,0.00019681179,0.00039889713,0.00009887346,0.000024700254,0.0000104795245,0.000012591286,0.00003804075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986711,0.00008324904,0.00048224383,0.00031878203,0.000107167376,0.0003374493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903744,0.00016184222,0.0002834106,0.00035627375,0.000015602598,0.00014542861],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062429573,0.00017652186,0.00033882618,0.000022307408,0.00017191576,0.00007556941,0.000665079,0.00014176306,0.00068619254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020894857,0.0001062763,0.000108109874,0.00011647641,0.000027043892,0.00019806309,0.00041483983,0.000096199714,0.0007973409],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017260779,0.00048604998,0.5155751,0.0001497325,0.00016194936,0.000030437972,0.0020481895,0.47130927,0.00008676812,0.0015972656,0.00059703144,0.007785579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004467951,0.0017589562,0.28006503,0.00011884209,0.00032242617,0.00030291267,0.0071623465,0.42942926,0.0023150397,0.03135929,0.24055728,0.002140646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006119325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028961204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23996025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020325577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022782711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278017839","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.017","title":"A rural myth? Sources and implications of the perceived unfairness of carbon taxes in rural communities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"Environment Canada; Carbon Management Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Economics; Opposition (politics); Carbon tax; Public economics; Disadvantaged; Revenue; Population; Tax reform; Economic growth; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Finance; Greenhouse gas","score_opus":0.028413295611288903,"score_gpt":0.20875940337943236,"score_spread":0.18034610776814344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278017839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829742,0.00014938384,0.0000041867147,0.0030883406,0.00010611157,0.00017172337,0.0002803936,0.000008762812,0.013216902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993462,0.0002299578,0.000030105208,0.00022242412,0.000034635512,0.000029498635,0.0000025726108,0.000010475404,0.00009414471],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883723,0.000035587473,0.00075113814,0.0001288993,0.000008140405,0.00023902324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886256,0.00030973196,0.00044015032,0.0003268567,0.000012688807,0.000048026588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003000767,0.0001336933,0.00049583294,0.000113324575,0.000067101435,0.000015271165,0.00038119935,0.00014052397,0.00008988126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008738139,0.00009607162,0.00011017228,0.00007234717,0.00053860416,0.00012914542,0.00020902227,0.000107207175,0.000009254632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000171985,0.00007080919,0.7636699,0.000014457593,0.000021362357,3.827066e-8,0.00080779276,0.000033826716,0.00006999868,0.2347578,0.000026559002,0.0005102688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000474828,0.000055440418,0.7794075,0.000018668876,0.000003001408,0.0000021825692,0.0010783324,0.0002847913,0.00007760674,0.21828134,0.00019980028,0.000116525895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008185913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096841884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016476447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010023948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018578965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3917687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283830242","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.018","title":"Economic viability and small-scale fisheries — A review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Profitability index; Scale (ratio); Fishing; Sustainability; Fisheries law; Business; Fishery; Fisheries management; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Finance; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.0418292509389675,"score_gpt":0.2780266871825944,"score_spread":0.23619743624362688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283830242","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017913332,0.76918596,0.000002354128,0.00044605724,0.00015226427,0.001124893,0.00008747267,0.00004032675,0.22878154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000013187448,0.9945772,0.00021869902,0.00029327534,0.000096571755,0.00030190774,0.000025375686,0.00002804439,0.0044575566],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977053,0.00019616564,0.0007367362,0.00085433316,0.00004375195,0.00046373677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998497,0.00044102373,0.00025389803,0.00055743696,0.0000033718247,0.0002472844],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007146614,0.0003918869,0.0016368548,0.000022817752,0.00011525818,0.00007275135,0.00056647375,0.0003680202,0.080051586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013267771,0.00026230628,0.00033676298,0.000049512753,0.000637593,0.00015496073,0.0014756793,0.0003289035,0.0028709662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023984635,0.00002786331,0.0014852645,0.0031627757,0.000020033169,0.0000026426776,0.00000204509,9.275686e-8,4.7442446e-9,0.00006567824,0.0046911114,0.9905401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006764439,0.00010975232,0.00032812325,0.0004892791,0.000055315326,0.000022641854,0.0000011843905,0.0000055057326,2.546806e-8,0.0005313601,0.9980464,0.0003427537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054808195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005872676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072210626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007787782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298062990","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.005","title":"Status concern and the exploitation of common pool renewable resources","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Common-pool resource; Commons; Oligopoly; Economics; Resource (disambiguation); Microeconomics; Non-renewable resource; Renewable resource; Natural resource economics; Business; Renewable energy; Ecology; Cournot competition","score_opus":0.03628183489732639,"score_gpt":0.2156243732839984,"score_spread":0.179342538386672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298062990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97291374,0.0010681272,0.00010028431,0.0026503543,0.00023329962,0.00023484147,0.000080633465,0.000019947673,0.022698749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99422425,0.0027314164,0.00029508615,0.0005003204,0.00005862791,0.00003409829,0.0000037547434,0.000012845951,0.0021396081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851185,0.000027772165,0.00078631856,0.00034180214,0.000014987106,0.00031725285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984593,0.0006596795,0.00053840596,0.00022902014,0.000015087375,0.00009852586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007456092,0.00014230785,0.00052837026,0.00007355275,0.000110152905,0.000050658084,0.00022577838,0.00011876948,0.0007915017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002706245,0.00008884395,0.000099235,0.000050560302,0.0003727061,0.0001752326,0.00015612763,0.00007832612,0.00014772484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070661283,0.00018365675,0.24218568,0.000037885056,0.00027243528,0.0000023815078,0.0024969985,0.0007096518,0.000041254385,0.7147171,0.003071399,0.035574965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060281246,0.00024126141,0.23620728,0.000023500512,0.000013232145,0.0000063606517,0.0007236741,0.0023118479,0.0002580153,0.34111205,0.4125813,0.00049336214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002772689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016771945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4095099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016287921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015902613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8666389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298980701","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.003","title":"The urban political ecology of ecosystem services: The case of Barcelona","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European Commission; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Ecosystem valuation; Valuation (finance); Politics; Agriculture; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Political science; Geography; Business; Economics; Ecology; Ecosystem health","score_opus":0.008046022363324327,"score_gpt":0.1951998997958032,"score_spread":0.18715387743247888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298980701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99075603,0.000019042527,0.000003150403,0.0018439298,0.00019877285,0.0002010741,0.000051174844,0.000011895611,0.0069149267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994895,0.000052254192,0.00002389833,0.00028398886,0.00006107677,0.00002282817,9.621673e-7,0.0000068992376,0.00005857669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873435,0.00013366935,0.00048725406,0.00022282984,0.000040177725,0.00038169944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815416,0.0011258607,0.00022883274,0.0003778508,0.000010557363,0.00010271251],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059962226,0.000115548784,0.00025518585,0.000010364902,0.0001895571,0.000014822896,0.0005355104,0.000121853285,0.00136342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002820531,0.000044322376,0.00009993968,0.000048221707,0.00013670338,0.00009543538,0.0003372451,0.000060222552,0.00036905898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015055225,0.0003718482,0.8568474,0.00014707881,0.00016757826,0.000118580836,0.00041928995,0.0006853872,0.0003024935,0.13501309,0.00089971273,0.004877007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028289773,0.0016722099,0.81845754,0.000079540776,0.00016622704,0.0013356499,0.0037537338,0.0183315,0.003594019,0.056302726,0.0925879,0.0008899924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003092182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09168819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012923311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000147247565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337382490","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.007","title":"Ecological monetary economics: A post-Keynesian critique","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Nexus (standard); Post-Keynesian economics; Monetary policy; Interest rate; Keynesian economics; Endogenous money; Debt; Monetary economics; Ecological economics; New Keynesian economics; Monetarism; Macroeconomics; Ecology; Sustainability","score_opus":0.022385945911172343,"score_gpt":0.21870390783061758,"score_spread":0.19631796191944523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337382490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9062046,0.0002929349,0.00029531255,0.012177376,0.0011141112,0.0004459395,0.00089592615,0.00021232148,0.07836148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983656,0.001911864,0.0009384534,0.008293712,0.00075753,0.00014637514,0.000038690843,0.0000725931,0.0041847993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995698,0.00009498704,0.0017361749,0.001345645,0.000010184466,0.0011150322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971169,0.0007944879,0.00069766457,0.00085070723,0.000038469803,0.00050177483],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012437114,0.00054814643,0.0012246344,0.0003104702,0.0002765316,0.00014942473,0.0009536553,0.0007049587,0.014454005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005502317,0.00048236086,0.0005448246,0.000098711556,0.00044696714,0.00080217264,0.00032877925,0.00033376666,0.01395162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010115395,0.00033448066,0.015639879,0.000010700186,0.00010575937,0.0000149625475,0.00008416166,0.00013382928,0.00002754588,0.9779021,0.0012268149,0.0044185733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016541282,0.0005557699,0.096314296,0.0000100315465,0.000012103179,0.000057574824,0.00007172583,0.0004323175,0.00011369062,0.7447305,0.15503143,0.0010164509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010455033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038895893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23317166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006360274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089907124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345203033","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.013","title":"Casting a long shadow: Demand-based accounting of Canada's greenhouse gas emissions responsibility","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Kyoto Protocol; Natural resource economics; Commit; Fossil fuel; Economics; Final demand; Production (economics); Shadow price; Agricultural economics; Carbon accounting; Environmental science; Engineering; Waste management; Ecology","score_opus":0.010086821107095011,"score_gpt":0.21271086566185515,"score_spread":0.20262404455476013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345203033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952874,0.0000050753115,0.00021800662,0.00092841656,0.000057335816,0.00021962918,0.000025804678,0.000024127818,0.0032342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986354,0.0000058208857,0.00063128053,0.0003189381,0.000017739441,0.000010465562,0.0000016284815,0.000010662559,0.0003680655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985042,0.00010642926,0.0004318169,0.00039452492,0.00010387586,0.00045910454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998622,0.0006103536,0.00018656536,0.00034736327,0.0000058721566,0.00022787263],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081849535,0.00015886987,0.0002521962,0.000017388727,0.00018394977,0.00001256796,0.00026012395,0.000110764944,0.0047728233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010610106,0.00010949055,0.00008295679,0.0000692471,0.0003441394,0.00017080059,0.00029989268,0.000106807296,0.000026235693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007922828,0.00016969941,0.9884579,0.000008655094,0.0000054558905,0.000013593893,0.00002849791,0.00413643,0.0013973523,0.00002574586,0.00024554867,0.0054318537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038777923,0.00011138724,0.9926864,0.000008406169,0.00000722246,0.000003717747,0.00006387613,0.0025192604,0.0022120196,0.0011536729,0.0006653952,0.00018090066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021655865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28292197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2612661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017367458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001832614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99613696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346698748","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.021","title":"The rise and fall of the sand monopoly in colonial Hong Kong","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"New York Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Colonialism; Business; Economic history; Economy; Political science; Economics; Ancient history; Law; Geography; History; Market economy","score_opus":0.014770770532777231,"score_gpt":0.24792247874218148,"score_spread":0.23315170820940426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346698748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826671,0.00014008416,0.0000010562584,0.012394488,0.00040809574,0.00021404907,0.0000083990035,0.000009473254,0.0041572778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841666,0.0009593096,0.00001324278,0.00010147249,0.0001204509,0.000011773141,5.4392277e-8,0.0000032642572,0.00037374257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920803,0.00016122336,0.00020205672,0.00014818615,0.000044078388,0.00023639684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988369,0.00088166835,0.000098680015,0.0001163136,0.000012110537,0.00005434843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063314755,0.0000651269,0.00013691602,0.000014306831,0.0003624361,0.0000450788,0.00027798006,0.00011382127,0.000043014894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003225734,0.00003190084,0.00005291784,0.000054665514,0.00082385616,0.00007686547,0.00009686509,0.00008105244,0.000007491408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015498576,0.00016669805,0.83478105,0.0000039886336,0.00003335713,0.0000047093777,0.009084122,0.000035974423,0.00008628976,0.12214247,0.00072743447,0.032778926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006177009,0.000068578825,0.8855547,0.000005779142,0.0000071119257,5.895433e-7,0.0003990488,0.00004624379,0.00010456662,0.024226647,0.08887522,0.00009384182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007616957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05741288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09791582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114771916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011922794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9597869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470069394","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.019","title":"Building the consensus: The moral space of earth measurement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"Government of Canada; World Bank Group","keywords":"Earth system science; Ecosystem services; Space (punctuation); Completeness (order theory); Natural capital; Work (physics); Earth observation; Chart; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Economics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.05311561467278637,"score_gpt":0.2186365337682007,"score_spread":0.16552091909541433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470069394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95964736,0.000021307042,0.00009555138,0.02506176,0.00012322707,0.00018566198,0.000007323711,0.000011823374,0.0148459915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809414,0.00006712948,0.00066720543,0.00096993503,0.0000457644,0.000010627861,1.312802e-7,0.0000058371766,0.0001392393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991737,0.00009292923,0.00020864587,0.00020071113,0.000121123914,0.00020288369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919254,0.0003561786,0.0001151738,0.000282489,0.0000031026452,0.00005050945],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092423643,0.00010006506,0.00011799753,0.000004920837,0.00017213126,0.000010854173,0.0003382757,0.00007654497,0.0015413493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013637383,0.00004188715,0.000076111755,0.00003234343,0.0010576566,0.000048810773,0.00028840784,0.00013101645,0.00038861783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002861283,0.0009043171,0.24707845,0.000018149713,0.00020742105,0.000013749654,0.00081122515,0.031749208,0.08779285,0.5933138,0.0074042026,0.030420514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078517164,0.00036024736,0.6632892,0.000016313224,0.000035232297,0.000015343976,0.00016517188,0.00057885156,0.019532695,0.25773957,0.057128154,0.0003540136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001952232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011336171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41621077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116870724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008138428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483300814","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.002","title":"Forest conservation policy and motivational crowding: Experimental evidence from Tanzania","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; Agricultural and Applied Economics Association","keywords":"Crowding out; Incentive; Crowding; Payment; Economics; Stylized fact; Dictator game; Ecosystem services; Animal ecology; Public economics; Tanzania; Sample (material); Natural resource economics; Business; Socioeconomics; Ecosystem; Microeconomics; Ecology; Psychology; Monetary economics; Finance; Biology","score_opus":0.07841829704190881,"score_gpt":0.3416995561109292,"score_spread":0.26328125906902045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483300814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98267925,0.00016286648,0.000021712369,0.011150274,0.00020356389,0.0002114285,0.000030158077,0.000054625565,0.0054861265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969429,0.00045402427,0.000840643,0.0009061769,0.00033682585,0.000055104647,0.000003917151,0.000008791292,0.0004516169],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989957,0.00006437722,0.00027009918,0.0003449661,0.000054004562,0.0002708308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987647,0.00083977636,0.00012937718,0.000102307364,0.000030637533,0.00013322338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024971386,0.00012613111,0.00018910579,0.000044441094,0.00042589282,0.00009326512,0.00017872475,0.00012327253,0.0006094842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005868443,0.00010334603,0.000046229918,0.00004547198,0.0006857625,0.00060427666,0.00017368655,0.000048877017,0.00009733783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004606463,0.00012275162,0.7089156,8.654396e-7,0.000021695894,0.0000017404543,0.00201136,0.000007227641,0.009865638,0.27724043,0.00069288875,0.001073757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008843904,0.0002709268,0.92841786,0.000040522573,0.000011385232,0.000001428365,0.0032028784,0.00011593238,0.00819925,0.046580918,0.011757577,0.0005169154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025124676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028237484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23065951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008546444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001492817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6673424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565587026","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.11.018","title":"Robust Surveillance and Control of Invasive Species Using a Scenario Optimization Approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Invasive species; Propagule pressure; Quarantine; Control (management); Host (biology); PEST analysis; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Biological dispersal; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.024093692381118206,"score_gpt":0.17879759012636834,"score_spread":0.15470389774525012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565587026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9271528,0.000007827958,0.06694067,0.0001416929,0.000062945175,0.00020526907,0.000008650481,0.0000116420915,0.005468499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987971,0.00012779518,0.011490729,0.0001944379,0.000014186833,0.000008708794,0.0000016647513,0.0000040697523,0.00018742101],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994017,0.00004098686,0.00017197133,0.00021186797,0.000023133334,0.00015034602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995944,0.00015040372,0.00011293148,0.00009729585,0.000004343205,0.000040647985],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021559357,0.000077033794,0.00016441135,0.000017174058,0.0000632749,0.000008413221,0.0000993123,0.000076869816,0.0014743843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009023369,0.000053260985,0.000025563593,0.0000350018,0.00034962498,0.000113616596,0.0001360589,0.000031904,0.000016936901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033120134,0.00008465122,0.25506198,0.0000047562803,0.000015949368,0.0000010972041,0.00002535462,0.7419581,0.00042362997,0.0020831642,0.00006920087,0.00023900917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011165226,0.00018765962,0.81228083,0.000003456779,0.000011601732,0.000008318534,0.000043760465,0.18489207,0.00009999803,0.0008548951,0.00032362994,0.00017722961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017436381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020260461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55721885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013445372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008238724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594012331","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.027","title":"Exploring Citizen Support for Different Types of Climate Policy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":259,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions","keywords":"Respondent; Climate change; Public economics; Climate policy; Opposition (politics); Turnover; Sample (material); Political science; Survey data collection; Public policy; Business; Environmental resource management; Politics; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.7367389942336753,"score_gpt":0.4722084882722747,"score_spread":0.2645305059614006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594012331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8838809,0.0000028997415,0.00000846304,0.003971138,0.00022429277,0.00017141402,0.000055540288,0.000022365895,0.11166295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984289,0.014741678,0.00017060681,0.00016326,0.00025261892,0.00006831149,0.000021625538,0.0000047747826,0.00028813534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994983,0.00003147524,0.0001634284,0.00010016401,0.00002338984,0.00018324655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932736,0.00015656427,0.00016838436,0.000255328,0.000031237443,0.00006113531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003387017,0.0000516719,0.000147503,0.000030409634,0.0006626258,0.00007074018,0.00036231132,0.00006150509,0.00090464205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037622417,0.00004719104,0.00007393311,0.00001046401,0.00018573433,0.00016278654,0.00013223477,0.0000400864,0.00003145769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010700648,0.000301146,0.055070963,0.000052981486,0.000032284654,3.5267374e-7,0.009840676,0.000036938185,0.000116463925,0.7626721,0.00031469006,0.1714544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000680071,0.00022195045,0.79032356,0.0000119108945,0.000016561415,2.933887e-7,0.0033048508,0.00038827953,0.000104597595,0.019271182,0.1854393,0.00023744303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013800815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025099816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74340093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010785243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035145622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598783559","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.023","title":"Managing Forests for Carbon and Timber: A Markov Decision Model of Uneven-aged Forest Management With Risk","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Natural resource economics; Forest management; Carbon fibers; Monoculture; Carbon price; Business; Environmental science; Economics; Ecology; Climate change; Agroforestry; Carbon dioxide; Computer science","score_opus":0.012748093202526884,"score_gpt":0.2246936980995771,"score_spread":0.21194560489705022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598783559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578441,0.000004608894,0.0013662516,0.00020183453,0.000043261753,0.00055104657,0.000012768653,0.000014712516,0.039961427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806289,0.00021438318,0.017259546,0.0000679568,0.000018669267,0.00006132273,0.00000407251,0.000013843224,0.0017312904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991289,0.000011230365,0.00020874226,0.00032995982,0.000055702945,0.00026546887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917644,0.00008497775,0.00025466003,0.00040304833,0.0000031365264,0.00007776103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032284748,0.00014325607,0.00020462826,0.00003636698,0.00027220187,0.00006587194,0.00035844016,0.00006342225,0.0001046341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032106476,0.00011353603,0.00005064282,0.000019906074,0.000249882,0.0001638762,0.00054080033,0.00006527497,0.000018826859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028975355,0.00007941097,0.62114656,0.000029971028,0.000047321202,0.000003751571,0.000051233725,0.35304213,0.0000023565035,0.0044117924,0.0009800156,0.019915707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007834178,0.000153615,0.47545657,0.00000751504,0.00003693146,5.5488357e-7,0.000006659119,0.49063674,0.000004111808,0.03217166,0.00061798387,0.00012425896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014829583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004269581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078592595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032870375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46298647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611572468","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.020","title":"Good for the Economy? An Ecological Economics Approach to Analyzing Alberta’s Bitumen Industry","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Asphalt; Process (computing); Economics; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental economics; Natural resource economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03421435940711139,"score_gpt":0.23187915322005373,"score_spread":0.19766479381294233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611572468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8099043,0.000021068572,0.0011613979,0.0013905653,0.0005131193,0.0007457945,0.000021415857,0.000122557,0.18611982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938847,0.00006779951,0.0025766098,0.00080638356,0.000616665,0.0004100555,0.000021897169,0.00004805302,0.0015678318],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830806,0.00002808148,0.00046828546,0.0005554529,0.000021134867,0.00061898737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823815,0.0003736837,0.00015595762,0.0009218162,0.00001731716,0.0002930565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065186905,0.00031539638,0.00046197732,0.00007623443,0.0007551434,0.0005751423,0.0012609056,0.0005014295,0.00016935707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013461242,0.0002389739,0.00018344262,0.000026645055,0.00012152658,0.00021558254,0.0003531757,0.00044626463,0.000109020046],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026540867,0.00029991704,0.0049699973,0.00003306951,0.00031225447,0.0000015012589,0.00026589443,0.933694,0.0000027837752,0.045496773,0.0030085475,0.011888702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076135626,0.00030592352,0.05491081,0.000004701629,0.00007855214,0.0000070404367,0.0005270749,0.5997688,0.000033010656,0.0015498837,0.34140897,0.0006438973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032723903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002545889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3384004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027413343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028561508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9745073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611893769","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.027","title":"The Impact on Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Geographic Shifts in Global Supply Chains","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Latin Americans; China; Natural resource economics; Climate change; Global warming; East Asia; Developing country; Geography; Supply chain; Environmental science; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.010587453913822499,"score_gpt":0.2686541456090285,"score_spread":0.258066691695206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611893769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812301,0.000010422144,0.0000018914684,0.0010108965,0.00007950106,0.00028687186,0.000079195655,0.000013079701,0.017288068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995606,0.00017261422,0.00004236793,0.000119104385,0.000017219334,0.000013297453,0.0000030495296,0.0000048385145,0.00006689862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987499,0.000069680034,0.0003068171,0.00031442873,0.00008260963,0.0004765791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988305,0.00009551623,0.00019393051,0.0006662258,0.00000195994,0.00021189198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045310878,0.00018331413,0.0002449759,0.000008441488,0.00046115703,0.00007515012,0.0007462767,0.00014480588,0.00088926736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024284107,0.000113527516,0.00018145336,0.00004933679,0.00095374236,0.00018474035,0.0005255184,0.00015057085,0.00009071458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009420542,0.00037569806,0.98934716,0.0000010708267,0.0000083234045,0.0000058641517,0.000019046427,0.0032242162,0.0000067514547,0.00093203515,0.00012359198,0.005862056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003886609,0.00037994946,0.9794179,0.0000025534118,0.0000036773347,0.000001975538,0.000071313065,0.0014988146,0.000011277749,0.017790722,0.00030772842,0.00012539365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017119867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048419535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018330537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012986775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002337974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738006973","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.007","title":"Unpacking the Relationships Between Pro-environmental Behavior, Life Satisfaction, and Perceived Ecological Threat","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":253,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Life satisfaction; Unpacking; Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.04457386597033414,"score_gpt":0.2662079032669694,"score_spread":0.22163403729663528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738006973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909297,0.000008473095,0.00000806564,0.0037008114,0.00012426825,0.00060644455,0.000015102434,0.000030044865,0.0045770598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855894,0.00009638546,0.00030449938,0.00039299938,0.00007504937,0.00012063871,0.000012689512,0.000011589378,0.0004272363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860895,0.00016619786,0.0003241622,0.0004994626,0.00008937246,0.00031184644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872726,0.00026972423,0.00021480085,0.00053464295,0.000001867918,0.00025172965],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006174855,0.00019029612,0.00021297482,0.000012334261,0.0022326757,0.00018273323,0.00033301645,0.00021250395,0.005381019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003999815,0.00013746027,0.00007527443,0.000013106461,0.0014072657,0.00040803183,0.0005714335,0.00042386985,0.0004337704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057720613,0.00012504502,0.9950551,0.0000011557253,0.0000075013686,0.0000013273449,0.00022915541,0.00012689177,0.000026136844,0.00037970458,0.00012189806,0.00392031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025090107,0.00007791856,0.99303794,7.536222e-7,0.000029864439,0.0000059198605,0.0012363265,0.00016747533,0.000005484486,0.0030855888,0.0019160366,0.00018576285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010494722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031249513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076291827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000656962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001650388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738391891","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.022","title":"Is Environmental Income Reporting Evasive in Household Surveys? Evidence From Rural Poor in Laos","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Probit model; Household income; Economics; Work (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Poverty trap; Ordered probit; Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Geography; Economic growth; Econometrics","score_opus":0.1315553523662712,"score_gpt":0.3386442867091382,"score_spread":0.20708893434286701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738391891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942191,0.000042127398,0.0000027897202,0.0014670293,0.00050716713,0.00025434993,0.00006357842,0.00002150432,0.0034223017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983453,0.0004969891,0.0000983183,0.0006214803,0.00022702134,0.000020455374,0.000006786091,0.000008258271,0.00017538569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976077,0.00051306636,0.0009386843,0.00038542092,0.00010853045,0.000446586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775666,0.0006824123,0.0010599629,0.00037852468,0.000007963471,0.00011446424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052218623,0.00014144432,0.00040686145,0.000044046083,0.0004786675,0.00019048157,0.0006325202,0.00026360876,0.0008121958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003992005,0.0001374354,0.00010319111,0.000031779782,0.00037632676,0.0007537749,0.0002953978,0.00029462497,0.00010062963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014140572,0.00008810728,0.99666727,0.0000020361601,0.0000050640247,0.000025740355,0.0017812409,0.00004692899,0.00002879635,0.00031841986,0.000040911258,0.000981346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000309402,0.000041676096,0.99276155,0.00002537411,0.0000028213833,4.3510246e-7,0.0015910709,0.000270437,0.000055696244,0.004408172,0.00033969132,0.00019366815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025486857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0799662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054479346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008745032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119348835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9810025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738831689","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.030","title":"Bird Killer, Industrial Intruder or Clean Energy? Perceiving Risks to Ecosystem Services Due to an Offshore Wind Farm","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment","keywords":"Risk perception; Ecosystem services; Opposition (politics); Environmental resource management; Business; Harm; Wind power; Natural resource economics; Offshore wind power; Ambiguity; Environmental planning; Environmental economics; Perception; Engineering; Geography; Ecosystem; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Politics; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07812844445200855,"score_gpt":0.3251046920846283,"score_spread":0.24697624763261972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738831689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846802,0.0000058348814,0.000031778287,0.0026591343,0.003088864,0.00040628458,0.000020117739,0.00031513628,0.008792682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918842,0.000082497114,0.00061146205,0.0021210036,0.0041885753,0.000060350132,0.000004162078,0.00006564118,0.0009821344],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732655,0.00029043687,0.0005171288,0.0008003576,0.00019131352,0.0008741908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977403,0.00026730975,0.00036893258,0.0006518945,0.00010903094,0.00086249283],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009497073,0.00031019663,0.00065586955,0.0001192801,0.0023363316,0.0011444497,0.002028882,0.0006859871,0.0015223622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081418204,0.00028018167,0.00014178082,0.0001561807,0.00017610766,0.00065125985,0.0005688838,0.00023583384,0.0002772318],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006193283,0.00053611293,0.07754914,0.000020132025,0.00018288255,0.00010925547,0.018531624,0.01609884,0.00005535039,0.029272975,0.0031703776,0.853854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019618857,0.0013467299,0.42696476,0.00009424481,0.00006630562,0.000008233072,0.08608315,0.0012753631,0.00019328379,0.0052072573,0.4748036,0.0019951786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038534705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8960855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8575508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007966509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035793774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762440865","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.09.003","title":"Integrating Watershed Hydrology and Economics to Establish a Local Market for Water Quality Improvement: A Field Experiment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; University of Rhode Island; University of Connecticut; U.S. Geological Survey; Hatch; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Environmental economics; Watershed; Water quality; Water supply; Supply and demand; Ecosystem services; Business; Environmental resource management; Economics; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Microeconomics; Environmental engineering; Computer science; Ecosystem; Ecology","score_opus":0.07926678737599382,"score_gpt":0.37568859949699407,"score_spread":0.29642181212100027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762440865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95912915,0.000002551993,0.024285726,0.010567126,0.00031024957,0.0005117482,0.00003235508,0.000020689795,0.005140383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99270827,0.000008859837,0.0024522135,0.0029102897,0.000118255724,0.0003335703,0.000006083073,0.0000074844584,0.0014549518],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824506,0.000072587165,0.0006840426,0.0006332377,0.00003955889,0.00032552058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776137,0.0010807134,0.00025820188,0.000661362,0.00005904163,0.0001793421],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026088476,0.0001481247,0.00035918038,0.000058111356,0.0007129701,0.0005563711,0.00069887,0.0001590936,0.001291374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011894915,0.000098352015,0.00010403775,0.000014547406,0.00020310978,0.00031468162,0.00051164324,0.00010555005,0.00009710686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019521777,0.00061056175,0.007127096,0.000018176997,0.00014398647,0.0000025571528,0.0031654774,0.0027325386,0.004669866,0.4647264,0.015797121,0.49905404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015547434,0.001310446,0.0067866454,0.0000030168499,0.000016652293,0.000007745681,0.00358171,0.026306508,0.047187928,0.69234556,0.22031558,0.00058348634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032014792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025505447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49847057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008148095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021736892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765221637","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.023","title":"Silencing Agency in Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) by Essentializing a Neoliberal ‘Monster’ Into Being: A Response to Fletcher &amp; Büscher's ‘PES Conceit’","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation; Genome Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Governmentality; Neoliberalism (international relations); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Critical theory; Praxis; Capitalism; Politics; Hegemony; Epistemology; Situational ethics; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01644320006015287,"score_gpt":0.24490355444995776,"score_spread":0.2284603543898049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765221637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99347097,0.000006897063,0.00009214938,0.0030809839,0.0002474745,0.00072772946,0.000027291093,0.000031583248,0.002314907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947865,0.00001558869,0.0010948336,0.0024012243,0.000047265054,0.0000826046,0.00001279722,0.000011151146,0.0015480481],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998531,0.00010512736,0.00034749822,0.00055047945,0.00008757218,0.00037836275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999051,0.00016559407,0.00022154422,0.00040053786,0.000008102676,0.00015324801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076466374,0.00019736736,0.00026336728,0.000053343436,0.00059869967,0.00024225563,0.0006897654,0.00013213982,0.00053504104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009332681,0.00018466012,0.00009287113,0.000045487188,0.00008340818,0.00022545835,0.00074095314,0.00009537316,0.00038805275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009691979,0.00038992515,0.97031754,0.000081419115,0.00007174724,0.00001648421,0.008243703,0.007883021,0.0036896043,0.000078811914,0.0021718058,0.0060867094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015475261,0.0002778565,0.83632874,0.000052983807,0.00002628392,0.0000010579349,0.0009261211,0.0056522046,0.00036286475,0.0014140055,0.1528934,0.00051697594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007029721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055487175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15072158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051660225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012507149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7530221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770776418","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.025","title":"Certified Organic Agriculture as an Alternative Livelihood Strategy for Small-scale Farmers in China: A Case Study in Wanzai County, Jiangxi Province","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Institut Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia; China Agricultural University; Department for International Development, UK Government; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Livelihood; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Business; Organic farming; Context (archaeology); Household income; Scale (ratio); Net income; Poverty; Agricultural science; Geography; Economics; Economic growth; Environmental science","score_opus":0.031829614094282435,"score_gpt":0.24618119564092167,"score_spread":0.21435158154663925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770776418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951432,0.00002200513,3.867817e-7,0.0021721923,0.00019071528,0.001693325,0.00013962339,0.00004826829,0.0005903128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989273,0.00004054112,0.000035408997,0.00020242791,0.0003493366,0.00012899813,0.000060405004,0.000003318176,0.00025226397],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979723,0.000112943155,0.0004716364,0.000823229,0.00006990679,0.00054998504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991351,0.0001326931,0.00031484925,0.00015875783,0.00006550542,0.00019312825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003890136,0.000336208,0.000489025,0.000017709353,0.00045470297,0.0003778046,0.00078468496,0.00032855396,0.00026159512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013527914,0.00013192379,0.0000978127,0.00012775167,0.00008986029,0.00038978385,0.00022439497,0.0003807415,0.000025568937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023043344,0.04846059,0.62646365,0.00016426804,0.0005832332,0.0124890115,0.017357517,0.0032706426,0.09946295,0.004862485,0.002706328,0.18187496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016104229,0.0041109626,0.9717421,0.000014585259,0.000023467634,0.00022435398,0.018054329,0.0003932889,0.0006104659,0.0017259268,0.0008720769,0.0006180056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003660559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33972356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34527844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002143499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005449239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6723248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771697361","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.019","title":"Visualisations in Choice Experiments: Comparing 3D Film-sequences and Still-images to Analyse Housing Development Alternatives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Set (abstract data type); Comprehension; Choice set; Citizen journalism; Computer science; Task (project management); Marketing; Management science; Economics; Business; Econometrics; World Wide Web; Management","score_opus":0.2368130272734687,"score_gpt":0.32031809695956814,"score_spread":0.08350506968609944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771697361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99153024,0.00013706682,0.00051340484,0.0002987693,0.0002207668,0.00022537334,0.000020184181,0.000016508853,0.007037685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930104,0.00017008772,0.006200172,0.00030396262,0.00006218809,0.00006664256,0.000013643319,0.000012752266,0.00016014613],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985553,0.000016500733,0.00063474494,0.000512823,0.000015013244,0.0002656002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991356,0.00008161972,0.00040896633,0.00025540165,0.0000053656117,0.00011302001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004813138,0.00016490786,0.00040818955,0.00015596538,0.00032944782,0.00028123884,0.00029889893,0.000079435646,0.00035195064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018802029,0.00019243549,0.000038877173,0.000027245238,0.00013233574,0.0005906992,0.0002753806,0.00009770681,0.00026473083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053972453,0.000084772095,0.9878287,0.000003845953,0.00002903786,0.0000011971167,0.0006909372,0.0067232624,0.000020133342,0.00344657,0.000016325383,0.0011498414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004641525,0.000042001207,0.9849638,0.000009234722,0.000002695192,6.495977e-7,0.00028310128,0.010084616,0.00026924524,0.001896782,0.0017309244,0.0002528257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029847265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073986733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068775387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004627433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001587687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7847292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781747296","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.026","title":"Wetlands, Flood Control and Ecosystem Services in the Smith Creek Drainage Basin: A Case Study in Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Wetland; Ecosystem services; Flood control; Flood myth; Environmental science; Damages; Flood mitigation; Detention basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecosystem; Structural basin; Drainage basin; Flooding (psychology); Environmental resource management; Water resource management; Geography; Ecology; Surface runoff; Engineering","score_opus":0.006384755467326371,"score_gpt":0.18675968952769517,"score_spread":0.1803749340603688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781747296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99666333,0.000015350994,6.847571e-7,0.00029741792,0.000113746304,0.00065701443,0.000033084652,0.00001063705,0.002208732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984001,0.000005049739,0.000017396658,0.0014127374,0.00007313467,0.00006584312,0.0000019669578,0.0000072594135,0.000016522388],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861896,0.00020750795,0.0003713211,0.0003881764,0.00006760512,0.00034644076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931973,0.0002489937,0.00010152278,0.00023880809,0.000004206835,0.000086763226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007998455,0.00015587962,0.00031438543,0.000021428366,0.00016784557,0.00011279515,0.00031589196,0.00008109557,0.00037111578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000071902195,0.00010477013,0.000022081718,0.0001037525,0.000023606119,0.0001705105,0.00014291462,0.0001279049,0.000044077155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002667911,0.00020096298,0.9947643,0.000021008598,0.000012622431,0.0011342925,0.0030392236,0.0003412239,7.214855e-7,0.0000035561104,0.00008221595,0.0003731918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020483125,0.00045405532,0.9029189,0.000011524071,0.00001703074,0.00037884573,0.0717329,0.020156574,0.0000013129834,0.00013698249,0.0019171056,0.00022647103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6219986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99985886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37786025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002596682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054942277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4272402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801058835","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.004","title":"The Energy-emissions Trap","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Renewable energy; Dispatchable generation; Natural resource economics; Fossil fuel; Economics; Investment (military); Environmental science; Environmental economics; Ecology; Engineering; Waste management; Distributed generation","score_opus":0.020920776826505127,"score_gpt":0.26753961989728264,"score_spread":0.24661884307077753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801058835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6306109,0.00005930927,0.00005252588,0.004324715,0.0003888075,0.000061564366,0.0000028589402,0.00008922634,0.3644101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868798,0.0001707751,0.000091305876,0.00092645816,0.00034612388,0.000035016066,0.000004396985,0.000009006827,0.011537119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988188,0.000117967684,0.0002393485,0.0002689332,0.000051259925,0.0005036463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988649,0.00046373898,0.000039765666,0.00036180165,0.00008760616,0.00018221588],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039273326,0.00011282367,0.00014126199,0.000020954274,0.00077034073,0.00008457508,0.0004530577,0.00017351033,0.0017255064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049213745,0.00006987995,0.00010439897,0.00010127084,0.0005648131,0.00006380248,0.00017810086,0.00014766611,0.00030899714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057573805,0.00007171202,0.00025279776,8.9344496e-7,0.000019854637,0.000003386842,0.000022591088,0.0006644152,0.000016496018,0.9438086,0.0027618764,0.052319765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001513732,0.00016880047,0.00344437,5.754293e-7,0.0000024355868,0.0000037109808,0.00013449126,0.0030311404,0.00026321458,0.2361381,0.7565665,0.00009528952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021328905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002245869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7538046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017086657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010911254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801810193","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.009","title":"Technological Change and Energy Efficiency in Large Chinese Firms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy Efficiency and Management","field":"Energy","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Tsinghua University; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Tsinghua Initiative Scientific Research Program; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Technological change; Embodied energy; Efficient energy use; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Energy consumption; China; Business; Investment (military); Energy (signal processing); Industrial organization; Production (economics); Profit (economics); Commerce; Market economy; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.01647394644225012,"score_gpt":0.2250913851943549,"score_spread":0.20861743875210478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801810193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94112206,0.00012273382,0.00034167207,0.00076934334,0.00026022084,0.00007946563,0.000003725592,0.00015046852,0.057150323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966268,0.0003533573,0.0002665715,0.0019443266,0.00019093485,0.000101034195,0.0000075559137,0.000011816497,0.0004975927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861217,0.000049059185,0.00030477854,0.00048424475,0.000042808468,0.00050692225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948096,0.000105262145,0.00007114127,0.00024577542,0.000014531288,0.000082314626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039220412,0.00019438229,0.00027901246,0.00014390543,0.0001373089,0.00003209501,0.000288638,0.0002652291,0.0006957001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014198024,0.00014670576,0.000050437844,0.00023189902,0.00041733973,0.00011443081,0.00039154664,0.00013601144,0.00009049531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029328883,0.00056154834,0.010975755,0.000005135467,0.000009693023,0.000024440747,0.000102656144,0.0004345543,0.000023485847,0.95648676,0.000068448266,0.031278178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022041202,0.0013519325,0.40530416,0.000015485126,0.000013144998,0.000020251959,0.00023526554,0.06903151,0.00020345967,0.06341915,0.45728505,0.00091646076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000116328505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038114195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8930676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085090716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009010895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76174283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809602916","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.06.006","title":"Looking for Medium-term Conservation and Development Impacts of Community Management Agreements in Uganda's Rwenzori Mountains National Park","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Social Science Research Council; Wildlife Conservation Society; Centre for International Forestry Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Livelihood; National park; Quartile; Geography; Baseline (sea); Welfare; Socioeconomics; Household income; Business; Agricultural economics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Fishery; Agriculture","score_opus":0.0327809303611204,"score_gpt":0.24318710339735855,"score_spread":0.21040617303623815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809602916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99571025,0.0000032444427,0.00014578148,0.0004542908,0.000072500006,0.0004165333,0.000010500381,0.000009222451,0.0031776526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965619,0.000033019263,0.0022024016,0.0010325423,0.000017702176,0.000022989743,0.000036156383,0.0000032195585,0.00009005453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992577,0.00004613099,0.000281274,0.00015382248,0.00008861192,0.0001724703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959034,0.000107009735,0.0001401348,0.00009305998,0.000019181483,0.000050256178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000747759,0.00009516647,0.00013083192,0.000057798352,0.00027653546,0.000023124023,0.00017781043,0.000057018722,0.00028921687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040739033,0.00009099681,0.000020898982,0.00006197496,0.00022058644,0.00009691632,0.0004249548,0.00005950434,0.000022693579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046774785,0.00019076122,0.99358183,0.000029421004,0.000030784835,4.523711e-7,0.0012498776,0.00014632133,0.000027342958,0.00014814227,0.0003589834,0.004189287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083364727,0.000106497166,0.9853537,0.0000073548285,0.0000073313468,3.6336994e-7,0.00078474014,0.0006966115,0.00012279465,0.00091084506,0.011072677,0.000103422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012820841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035748472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010713693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044024212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017143075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37107423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810013445","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.06.012","title":"A Quantitative Approach for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Corporations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainability; Probabilistic logic; Focus (optics); Sustainability organizations; Measure (data warehouse); Environmental economics; Computer science; Economics; Business; Environmental resource management; Management science; Econometrics; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Ecology","score_opus":0.030976905350305704,"score_gpt":0.2689050920034535,"score_spread":0.23792818665314783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810013445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765911,0.0000014522705,0.004202757,0.000098899145,0.000039623057,0.00039168683,0.0000048266584,0.000014492696,0.018655147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662845,0.000005515557,0.03306257,0.000129654,0.000026903008,0.00007359965,0.000016813152,0.0000064954384,0.0003939345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921626,0.000021898484,0.00024055954,0.00024314389,0.000036472575,0.00024167511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999581,0.00009217072,0.00013248097,0.00012535117,0.000015463918,0.00005352546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033636365,0.00009400609,0.00015265401,0.000021529984,0.00019798717,0.000019775565,0.00014792796,0.0000684111,0.0005591435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001314536,0.00008494585,0.00004571872,0.00008753803,0.00064440875,0.00030684486,0.00014812226,0.000046646943,0.000038537397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029907844,0.0010188344,0.92193127,0.000097132324,0.000039990508,6.574956e-7,0.0011181361,0.0317091,0.0004969599,0.028368726,0.0017074691,0.013212628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042067605,0.00075228425,0.87097865,0.0000012694237,0.000010699489,0.000001566054,0.0019575641,0.10888107,0.00082498847,0.0136294225,0.0023073927,0.0002344067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020899537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012471498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077171974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053194846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036935424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6122229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890166935","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.022","title":"Consumer Response to Climate Adaptation Strategies in the Food Sector: An Australian Scenario","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Department of Agriculture and Water, Australian Government; Australian Government","keywords":"Respondent; Product (mathematics); Purchasing; Business; Willingness to pay; Marketing; Adaptation (eye); Climate change; Wine; Economics; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.06506050376647593,"score_gpt":0.2623184322697494,"score_spread":0.19725792850327345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890166935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98264444,0.0000011235699,0.0000097442835,0.008466798,0.000274098,0.00024106038,0.0000055517107,0.000046747584,0.008310419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938398,8.447232e-7,0.00015338216,0.0036443532,0.0022448774,0.000024970926,0.000012719742,0.0000088646175,0.000070216316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912256,0.000048745456,0.00024193373,0.00024270706,0.000040231556,0.00030382298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955964,0.00009939026,0.000094739815,0.00019115431,0.00003693712,0.000018145036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008729379,0.00012407603,0.0001357755,0.00009754922,0.00017544374,0.00044158302,0.00028052574,0.00013576674,0.0007269498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099352575,0.00009306585,0.0000340425,0.00014500691,0.000085127765,0.00084218936,0.00007380766,0.00017168137,0.00074182654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011068387,0.0038627884,0.25242725,0.00018793845,0.00023295131,0.00030852205,0.008061131,0.04555213,0.0010022712,0.50638795,0.1541966,0.016712088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000655361,0.00042527338,0.69251025,0.000009303351,0.00001654523,0.000004550999,0.004738623,0.0037287183,0.000020470616,0.010436224,0.2871404,0.00031425434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000116373405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018938305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4959517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004108653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003560819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95349264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896651838","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.008","title":"Food Security and Wildlife Management in Nunavut","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Government of Nova Scotia","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Wildlife; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Arctic; Wildlife management; Business; Geography; Environmental resource management; Food systems; Food insecurity; Natural resource economics; Environmental planning; Agriculture; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.03900931512143772,"score_gpt":0.3286851798621691,"score_spread":0.28967586474073137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896651838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88094294,0.000023681674,0.0000032749747,0.0026035595,0.00060928124,0.000613271,0.000008510247,0.000029671966,0.115165785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98450184,0.000561809,0.00026829256,0.013972403,0.00028931096,0.00015031044,0.000003006099,0.000008170191,0.0002448599],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998525,0.00009927876,0.00035207625,0.00027387953,0.00001712328,0.0007325999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994842,0.00018928968,0.00009130535,0.00013196329,0.000028314396,0.000074961376],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005651712,0.00010352383,0.00025826422,0.000048788475,0.0011489358,0.000005109669,0.00010674528,0.00021001407,0.0010438702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046222744,0.000090715635,0.000024526094,0.000045106422,0.00013048062,0.000040896542,0.00045738992,0.00026016592,0.0006014627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000382717,0.00061566103,0.6441189,0.00019205347,0.0002219619,0.00003312409,0.040281873,0.00002013983,6.4484584e-7,0.27888417,0.032263286,0.002985482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019265715,0.0021623424,0.5644026,0.000012506664,0.000016369082,0.0000026586767,0.023424994,0.0005500553,9.078702e-7,0.05960317,0.34759125,0.0003065696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007559312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061627496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31532797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032050023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044956978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901686490","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.013","title":"Network Governance of Land-Sea Social-Ecological Systems in the Lesser Antilles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Corporate governance; Network governance; Collaborative governance; Business; Environmental resource management; Social network (sociolinguistics); Environmental planning; Geography; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.0196920836831123,"score_gpt":0.21422950209233113,"score_spread":0.19453741840921884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901686490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9567069,0.00005610738,0.000004400146,0.0008919498,0.0003487274,0.00024393536,0.000010355159,0.000014590657,0.04172306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988164,0.00013887021,0.000044474484,0.00038972578,0.00031610753,0.000036067864,0.0000020270015,0.000004343451,0.00025199118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989425,0.00010068028,0.00033984263,0.00024696396,0.000062937324,0.00030710179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994479,0.0002102856,0.00017963954,0.00012873713,0.000007384418,0.000026049163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054283754,0.00011829794,0.00031060213,0.000005917492,0.00019960369,0.000022680473,0.0003473091,0.000105730025,0.00067957083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004528517,0.00007157066,0.00006080092,0.00011337689,0.00032282344,0.000070071255,0.0003031587,0.00011173555,0.00026412544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032760952,0.00020624699,0.9684353,0.000009416666,0.000011896005,0.0000061537244,0.00017089793,0.0010844662,0.0000065052154,0.012716914,0.016197534,0.0011219056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017409788,0.00017713009,0.95312333,0.0000034678699,0.000004423466,0.0000038145142,0.00009996221,0.0012177621,0.0000020914758,0.0017962412,0.0432952,0.00010245035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005158538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008376906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04210952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001187847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008617439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7440824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910080003","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.013","title":"Alternative and Resistance Movements: The Two Faces of Sustainability Transformations?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Sustainability; Social movement; Resistance (ecology); Politics; Social sustainability; Movement (music); Environmental ethics; Environmental movement; Transformation (genetics); Sociology; Political science; Ecology; Aesthetics; Biology","score_opus":0.010319423814478224,"score_gpt":0.23106179145127412,"score_spread":0.2207423676367959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910080003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98105156,0.000026940968,0.00003002509,0.001297638,0.000048958173,0.00047155074,0.000020392947,0.0000074699497,0.017045485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881566,0.0001297462,0.000091294816,0.0003453259,0.000006693909,0.000031266383,0.0000015228884,0.000002597025,0.0005759191],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999343,0.00004635143,0.00020395631,0.000194688,0.00005068362,0.0001613465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994795,0.00018867696,0.000112453825,0.00017604139,0.000013085804,0.000030245797],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003641074,0.000075350756,0.000130693,0.0000058701116,0.000075900374,0.000016206997,0.0001901745,0.000033587927,0.0016597313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008534417,0.000052013063,0.00003507247,0.00005113099,0.0003242739,0.00023058044,0.000119889766,0.00007270468,0.000032229545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040954328,0.00076845766,0.8008412,0.00028314328,0.00006935699,0.000002965641,0.023390407,0.050081983,0.0001869476,0.117103174,0.000399718,0.006463078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009843601,0.0002071555,0.61011755,0.000005419083,0.000008561143,0.0000010943506,0.020860972,0.0036452967,0.0005455027,0.34045184,0.022934511,0.00023777258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000886047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075027416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22334866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035293202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010824207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920111783","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.005","title":"Climate justice, commons, and degrowth","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Indigenous; Climate justice; Livelihood; Commodification; Environmental ethics; Grassroots; Sociology; Environmental justice; Degrowth; Solidarity; Politics; Injustice; Political ecology; Democracy; Corporate governance; Equity (law); Political economy; Climate governance; Economic Justice; Political science; Climate change; Economics; Law; Sustainability; Economy; Ecology","score_opus":0.010890081593139752,"score_gpt":0.1747180372230911,"score_spread":0.16382795562995134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920111783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6903843,0.000074506584,1.7256576e-7,0.0002733648,0.00032632693,0.00007238781,0.000058714388,0.000021957558,0.30878824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99461067,0.00022279701,0.000095421,0.0019969146,0.00017344744,0.0000062762892,0.000030289695,0.000008231688,0.0028559458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947035,0.000013098456,0.00013759836,0.00016966845,0.000015016186,0.00019424305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997271,0.00008093565,0.00003111413,0.00009928134,0.0000031752622,0.00005840537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000070816255,0.00009193613,0.00014726749,0.000017192977,0.00014749487,0.0001383158,0.00007481075,0.000053360884,0.0052488856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000053468543,0.00007500756,0.000032129436,0.000003880258,0.00012457008,0.00013343955,0.0000907389,0.00010746035,0.0009316974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012826864,0.00006067219,0.010493492,0.000034547964,0.0000071286013,0.000002841057,0.000589185,0.000009308746,0.000005244403,0.9868376,0.001248674,0.0006984662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006216448,0.00030663822,0.054735117,0.000012162323,0.000044744083,0.000010565537,0.0019464673,0.00084563816,0.00001627976,0.01316076,0.9279457,0.0003543251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000026065989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008476155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97367686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020682883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002372013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943386179","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.018","title":"From ecological macroeconomics to a theory of endogenous money for a finite planet","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Ecological economics; Macroeconomics; Endogeneity; Corporate governance; Neoclassical economics; Sustainability; Ecology; Finance","score_opus":0.027687458447322753,"score_gpt":0.2427588341434611,"score_spread":0.21507137569613835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943386179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764497,0.000023614619,0.00009923266,0.00037031254,0.00030576624,0.0007894776,0.0005680941,0.000053803702,0.021339996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959026,0.000030876956,0.0015498351,0.0012012806,0.00014376275,0.00016937332,0.0002459035,0.000021790196,0.0007345889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797523,0.00014801254,0.0005898343,0.0005947795,0.000049784314,0.0006423399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635065,0.0027398607,0.00013323972,0.000463728,0.00006511442,0.0002473825],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066217524,0.00022766742,0.0006544847,0.00007694043,0.00008030682,0.000040476807,0.000564331,0.0003843779,0.0048165605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068382785,0.00020195643,0.0001820856,0.0000656176,0.00012569012,0.00007777156,0.00030041693,0.00019236513,0.0007306827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026498807,0.0007855106,0.006627187,0.00004854407,0.00022677214,0.000017355613,0.00031009052,0.38667572,0.0005393272,0.5894789,0.000392277,0.0122484155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030652196,0.0032010875,0.02080627,0.000006362344,0.000041250063,0.00001021117,0.0013659088,0.01761454,0.00140978,0.7561475,0.19557853,0.00075332023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040434604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074444374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36906117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030955163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014613196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99609315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964245833","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106355","title":"Tradable climate liabilities: A thought experiment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; HEC Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Harm; Liability; Debt; Climate change; Economics; Revenue; Decentralization; Business; Natural resource economics; Finance; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.062090829855669334,"score_gpt":0.23729456172001925,"score_spread":0.17520373186434993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964245833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80333626,0.00036657564,0.00002192178,0.0010817396,0.0011874964,0.00042112323,0.00034778228,0.00010300809,0.19313407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897232,0.0017704089,0.0012277901,0.002409271,0.00033491754,0.00014068428,0.000055874905,0.000056130397,0.0042817066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972035,0.000018020626,0.0010616169,0.00082929333,0.000015523467,0.0008720344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855655,0.00019744852,0.000406929,0.000625837,0.000012530114,0.00020072941],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007252035,0.00031212077,0.00084006175,0.00015447156,0.00014349008,0.00015638562,0.00043883288,0.00028608128,0.016313788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006694594,0.0003512808,0.00029661812,0.00009692372,0.000095682306,0.00040793073,0.00023681375,0.00022444988,0.01737335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058899514,0.0003335553,0.049641952,0.00005895423,0.000059202124,0.0000024145024,0.00058033224,0.0007862397,0.000017459317,0.9471493,0.0011062485,0.00020546881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028667895,0.00078911945,0.031859126,0.000021114978,0.00001241201,0.000025019486,0.0016941751,0.018485703,0.0005917767,0.17463769,0.7672541,0.0017629748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060708866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004429631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7725116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050779886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023262235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965430492","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106418","title":"Who promotes sustainability? Five theses on the relationships between the degrowth and the environmental justice movements","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Degrowth; Materialism; Overconsumption; Reproduction; Prosperity; Capital accumulation; Sustainability; Economic Justice; Economics; Ecological economics; Economic system; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Neoclassical economics; Ecology; Biology; Economic growth; Profit (economics)","score_opus":0.03212482189813606,"score_gpt":0.26648662597992717,"score_spread":0.2343618040817911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965430492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95062494,0.00012264871,0.0000020134603,0.03315023,0.00008601838,0.0011874164,0.000019007906,0.000012563754,0.014795161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934274,0.0013433032,0.000009844862,0.0031705494,0.00015041468,0.00008316479,0.0000039572924,0.0000062763434,0.0018050877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984602,0.0006890873,0.00021954153,0.00022159042,0.0001040633,0.00030552864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993091,0.006506554,0.00011672109,0.0002126817,0.0000055398014,0.000067514215],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020364227,0.00011015011,0.00016411541,0.000011240087,0.0018348113,0.00011488835,0.00034017436,0.000113198425,0.0004160897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000734352,0.000052302406,0.00005406608,0.000032361644,0.0014265567,0.00014193423,0.00016127205,0.0003721389,0.00013722717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059537386,0.00009026868,0.38742745,0.000037850823,0.00003492065,4.0396887e-7,0.014811933,0.00019405517,2.473175e-7,0.5963416,0.00022907043,0.000772651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033611225,0.00010653783,0.8268465,0.000007983834,0.00005702914,1.9938845e-7,0.11139116,0.00024961217,0.000003409477,0.054993007,0.005906359,0.00010211227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016001292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003383936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5413486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003032519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051134586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972991779","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106447","title":"Metabolic relationships between cities and hinterland: a political-industrial ecology of energy metabolism of Saint-Nazaire metropolitan and port area (France)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Urban metabolism; Metropolitan area; Port (circuit theory); Industrial ecology; Political ecology; Politics; Industrial symbiosis; Order (exchange); Material flow analysis; Economic geography; Regional science; Ecology; Sociology; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Business; Urban planning; Political science; Sustainability; Economics; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.020935635304845195,"score_gpt":0.20646368742069904,"score_spread":0.18552805211585385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972991779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950877,0.000114608236,0.000027527745,0.00054076203,0.00009337718,0.00022600009,0.000046524576,0.000014848101,0.003848684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914974,0.000065570726,0.00017619523,0.00011004224,0.000058094076,0.000018306739,0.000011313679,0.000007870397,0.00040287513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802744,0.00025678246,0.0007564979,0.0004438965,0.00008468746,0.00043066926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837214,0.00081870245,0.00031827128,0.00024037955,0.000021577254,0.00022894272],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008672159,0.00019154228,0.0009768669,0.00008796481,0.000097573575,0.000017504059,0.00018937723,0.00038433535,0.0018667291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051938824,0.00015251865,0.00015294563,0.00014050257,0.0007154227,0.00016023683,0.00032238406,0.00021333192,0.000013845565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019635188,0.00006022847,0.8888656,0.000009776165,0.000085328815,9.213199e-7,0.000047275087,0.00014065497,0.000016347745,0.110016085,0.000018826535,0.0007193159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005523776,0.00024070061,0.96135557,0.000002724192,0.00011155605,0.0000046432615,0.0014211778,0.00047436834,0.00011191723,0.03135327,0.0042004013,0.00017129348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021350435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070940633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07866281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029162163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025857084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011627004","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106650","title":"Trading off visual disamenity for renewable energy: Willingness to pay for seaweed farming for energy production","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Innovate UK; Crown Estate; Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea; Queen's University; Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras; Eusko Jaurlaritza; Queen's University Belfast; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Newcastle University; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science","keywords":"Renewable energy; Biogas; Production (economics); Status quo; Agricultural economics; Willingness to pay; Feed-in tariff; Business; Natural resource economics; Fishery; Agricultural science; Geography; Economics; Environmental science; Ecology; Energy policy; Biology","score_opus":0.024066967228749934,"score_gpt":0.22652293215110042,"score_spread":0.2024559649223505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011627004","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44005224,0.000007912879,0.5329852,0.016904041,0.0011047284,0.0023855646,0.000099511846,0.00017306641,0.006287758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98177636,0.00001638315,0.008287526,0.0024678207,0.00048183498,0.001043805,0.00006692023,0.000022534352,0.005836796],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988364,0.000011930318,0.00025185858,0.00052963046,0.0000353392,0.000334826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952894,0.00012864951,0.000083600215,0.00008936764,0.000008340451,0.00016107572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020189566,0.0001448921,0.00022023973,0.000013335964,0.00021805649,0.00004715893,0.00016960863,0.00005746709,0.0001425231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016261711,0.00012058935,0.000118026874,0.000069166075,0.00003190145,0.00013359841,0.00050644745,0.000028422517,0.0000046807386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077687606,0.00037461956,0.0010050827,0.00007011613,0.00005214709,6.1521496e-7,0.00019476746,0.21955375,0.0030476698,0.0046459893,0.02688394,0.74339443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052490237,0.00089564687,0.00055965467,0.0000020122686,0.00002580391,4.430241e-7,0.00010560466,0.18622111,0.0034727626,0.011642514,0.7962889,0.00026062698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003054097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021866842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.769405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022022381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009822001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49174908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022363387","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.07.006","title":"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Regional resilience and development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Fragility; Risk analysis (engineering); Diversification (marketing strategy); Event (particle physics); Redundancy (engineering); Adaptability; Environmental resource management; Psychological resilience; Computer science; Business; Economics; Computer security; Psychology","score_opus":0.04201372401906497,"score_gpt":0.20953025920167076,"score_spread":0.16751653518260579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022363387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698897,0.00030069656,0.0038466651,0.0097776465,0.00048007737,0.00036113634,0.000030166068,0.00011657164,0.015197338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846554,0.0007805493,0.007708538,0.00633731,0.000138593,0.00013550984,0.000016304652,0.000024004865,0.00020378138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659127,0.000010580046,0.0014295838,0.0010663406,0.000030448462,0.0008717745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847376,0.00012326491,0.000516931,0.000470878,0.000030457599,0.00038471082],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008280814,0.0003345916,0.0007898984,0.00023148827,0.00033536128,0.0001724729,0.0006984891,0.00027620746,0.00029735704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036428275,0.00035815095,0.00029256273,0.0002350089,0.00025238143,0.0007281013,0.00023168651,0.00026253046,0.0020153502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038567978,0.00037654344,0.073136054,0.0000045076217,0.00003675027,0.000021723235,0.00021587312,0.026813192,0.000008337606,0.89897746,0.000051971514,0.00031904754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013620559,0.00022490261,0.38476285,0.0000035757766,0.0000013319993,0.000022923776,0.000094540424,0.00014583829,0.00014586515,0.6016477,0.011191133,0.00039729266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014025578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016628977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3116268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009386888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011552803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023169256","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.022","title":"","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.02165735177075505,"score_gpt":0.23291462682147784,"score_spread":0.21125727505072278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023169256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827288,0.000020554642,0.000045026143,0.0060949647,0.00018314642,0.0004673579,0.000028985607,0.00084174925,0.009589459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831037,0.00003404205,0.0037696834,0.012701383,0.00024498132,0.000032411892,0.000023137572,0.00003184543,0.00005882377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968901,0.00013352117,0.0008513148,0.00090470404,0.00006541056,0.001154917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981504,0.00034557705,0.00030677335,0.0006249386,0.000052317082,0.0005199986],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009522732,0.00039628334,0.00067209447,0.00013799661,0.00031253556,0.00017810907,0.0007914566,0.00032980452,0.0004685593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056119415,0.00036441663,0.00027543114,0.00021197884,0.00019327836,0.00072755,0.00011991465,0.00038630402,0.0032602693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016872281,0.006890326,0.14670391,0.000004325773,0.00013814186,0.00023580344,0.0005210865,0.11038829,0.011403288,0.6710825,0.004456017,0.04648909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016056307,0.0014528909,0.8589183,0.0000012279377,0.000013510715,0.00004812217,0.00007360925,0.0050869705,0.00078997406,0.12655154,0.004947025,0.0005112069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000047377357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012901645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7122144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071836845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006756481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048569219","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106806","title":"Ecological Economics Beyond Markets","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Sustainability; Economics; Redistribution (election); Market system; Ecological economics; Sketch; Goods and services; Market economy; Ecology; Political science","score_opus":0.014197157965195965,"score_gpt":0.1695979451819698,"score_spread":0.15540078721677383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048569219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.938234,0.000059181664,6.30318e-7,0.047095504,0.0002976409,0.00028560107,0.00012753218,0.00020362876,0.013696292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851057,0.00037442253,0.00019533814,0.012692226,0.0012237913,0.00002228285,0.000117758114,0.0000024820463,0.0002660096],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806315,0.00008475183,0.0004885236,0.0007392139,0.000051217747,0.00057314034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988577,0.00036313268,0.00018251526,0.00007489421,0.00003139424,0.0004903892],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020240662,0.00032182556,0.00048950117,0.000006439656,0.0002659385,0.00015064253,0.0006235356,0.00043954284,0.008757785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015803121,0.00012260859,0.0002596132,0.00016394898,0.00011048741,0.00019952883,0.00033153454,0.00035281447,0.0010380029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014992461,0.0056401743,0.049022984,0.000088496396,0.0007204641,0.00030181487,0.0008005088,0.0017197642,0.07874829,0.10174498,0.35313898,0.40657428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004509844,0.0012390533,0.45969826,0.000002334807,0.00002370041,0.000023572276,0.0002917854,0.00084985606,0.0009388712,0.004540777,0.53124994,0.0006908767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000047004155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017452509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4106753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009264541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019147452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132254837","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106985","title":"Rhetoric, epistemology and climate change economics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Climate change; Economics; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Natural resource economics; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.13583233503859612,"score_gpt":0.25574319551713226,"score_spread":0.11991086047853614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132254837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.927205,0.0032502096,0.0000344335,0.006528288,0.0016912776,0.0002905548,0.0007935494,0.000098810364,0.06010788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92326564,0.06493792,0.002315284,0.007246077,0.0011267335,0.00019821966,0.00016288257,0.00008693595,0.0006603074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996852,0.00003534665,0.0011414186,0.0010639927,0.00000913298,0.0008981022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983482,0.00024459977,0.0005283221,0.00053690566,0.000029562932,0.0003124607],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000648891,0.00036366621,0.0010338217,0.0001748105,0.00027090893,0.00019499612,0.0002876357,0.00045665124,0.0019285262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015141815,0.00046325603,0.00022458674,0.00010992759,0.0002000181,0.00045960693,0.00052504905,0.00028177662,0.0018679484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025350517,0.000163127,0.05729742,0.00004536104,0.000062561325,0.00002326799,0.00024088036,0.000028769813,0.000002156018,0.9380767,0.00022026217,0.0038141499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026017837,0.0003430683,0.21206501,0.000019224555,0.000034666064,0.00042434814,0.00041841145,0.010707895,0.00011681951,0.39550468,0.3759486,0.0018154777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055084813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004938052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.542572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035429548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030694337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139265487","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107004","title":"Commons grabbing and agribusiness: Violence, resistance and social mobilization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Directorate for Geosciences; National Science Foundation; Generalitat de Catalunya; European Commission; National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center; FP7 Coherent Development of Research Policies","keywords":"Commons; Agrarian society; Land grabbing; Global commons; Political science; Economic system; CONTEST; Resource mobilization; Political economy; Social movement; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Politics; Agriculture; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.012560236481681307,"score_gpt":0.18081417804296704,"score_spread":0.16825394156128573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139265487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968228,0.00023523365,0.0000033463464,0.001785993,0.00008336108,0.00010622306,0.000025231428,0.000041587577,0.0008962623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978967,0.0008230494,0.00018931863,0.0005807608,0.00011928007,0.00001594159,0.00012505507,6.974626e-7,0.00024922303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991984,0.000046769772,0.00019931338,0.0003177425,0.00003807871,0.00019973861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964297,0.00014023329,0.000076443546,0.000024647545,0.00005244476,0.000063247215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011361751,0.000121610814,0.00019682237,0.000004470147,0.0003548684,0.00010422081,0.00007962984,0.00013857312,0.00012097145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038800008,0.000048207046,0.000031208707,0.000110376684,0.00007501427,0.000110627334,0.00015190493,0.00008836883,0.000007844223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014590356,0.0007101144,0.4838764,0.00010529685,0.000116908544,0.00007728528,0.0005623495,0.000084576284,0.0042443713,0.3496431,0.0072715166,0.15316218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001270721,0.0000259728,0.9502876,0.000009610532,0.000006950475,0.000009297581,0.0003121282,0.000040939052,0.0001613069,0.033000626,0.015842773,0.00017572656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008637451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022299574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4664112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003934486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000892899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27293965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143862038","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107054","title":"Ecological trap in tourism-urbanization: Simulating the stagnation and restoration of urbanization from the perspective of government incentives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"Urbanization; Tourism; Incentive; Government (linguistics); Natural resource economics; Business; Ecotourism; Environmental planning; Economics; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Economic growth; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.010803128671082816,"score_gpt":0.20239162488820817,"score_spread":0.19158849621712534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143862038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99705166,0.0000669057,0.000075083575,0.00092302193,0.00005363611,0.00016497388,0.0000216557,0.000003966224,0.0016390726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995448,0.00012398088,0.0001288494,0.00013268617,0.000035468227,0.00000611637,0.0000121383755,0.0000029219416,0.0000130580165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927783,0.00013138367,0.00027404068,0.00016161098,0.000076869605,0.00007826788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921453,0.00044981594,0.00020062299,0.00010218616,0.0000167998,0.000016028496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002598875,0.0000628005,0.00013032209,0.000004575647,0.000089524845,0.000021406002,0.000102509744,0.000067952074,0.00053146615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016089476,0.0000372407,0.000022534312,0.00011169115,0.00004513402,0.00015359909,0.00012613193,0.000060241196,0.000004050588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022988583,0.00015805148,0.9255929,0.000004268181,0.000013698158,8.537242e-7,0.001627496,0.0675869,0.00026673445,0.0043145726,0.0000626698,0.00034888278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002443962,0.00006122825,0.9515127,0.0000057195143,0.000009144871,3.90454e-7,0.002993419,0.038681913,0.0005378429,0.005740013,0.00016222174,0.000051039766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014160093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045317663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028904987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022052627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010636822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5819182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154263767","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107062","title":"Sustainable commodity governance and the global south","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; International Studies Association","keywords":"Commodity; Commodity chain; Corporate governance; Sustainability; Context (archaeology); Environmental governance; Civil society; Global governance; Agency (philosophy); Futures contract; Business; Economics; Political science; Production (economics); Politics; Market economy; Sociology; Geography; Social science; Finance","score_opus":0.016092464997571734,"score_gpt":0.22404011491358047,"score_spread":0.20794764991600873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154263767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9267511,0.00015971177,0.000011388612,0.007824166,0.00021475907,0.0002091084,0.00001631651,0.000049339313,0.06476416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929358,0.000057904155,0.00002243114,0.006081883,0.00046220157,0.0000090764115,0.000009698921,0.0000052722517,0.00041576836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905914,0.000032576572,0.00020445048,0.00026017163,0.000049898423,0.00039378734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943465,0.000098941564,0.00013461473,0.00018896186,0.000119350596,0.000023500446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049579545,0.0001346034,0.0002703515,0.0000062741274,0.0004021038,0.00051808526,0.00020191183,0.000104777086,0.00016820806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009907157,0.0000977353,0.000109779685,0.00015146153,0.0003487403,0.00044848,0.00041836817,0.00013269357,0.00004190142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052934487,0.00007576917,0.09166959,0.00003747093,0.000018075525,0.000021581222,0.00009000341,0.00011812772,1.7600883e-8,0.90675014,0.00081546593,0.0003508145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014944392,0.000010569105,0.45329133,0.0000022318231,0.00004641563,0.0000032233934,0.011004717,0.0011489835,5.1613466e-7,0.46890995,0.06388056,0.00020706157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005361227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046801576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43784022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026756816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007230856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49959078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182413613","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107142","title":"Have environmental preferences and willingness to pay remained stable before and during the global Covid-19 shock?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Horizon 2020; European Commission","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Flemish; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Economics; Shock (circulatory); Econometrics; Demographic economics; Multivariate statistics; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Public economics; Socioeconomics; Geography; Statistics; Mathematics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.04971093162918981,"score_gpt":0.21538982418235814,"score_spread":0.1656788925531683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182413613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99340683,0.00043560902,0.0002189221,0.0030320005,0.00016023203,0.00027099246,0.00034987775,0.00001943757,0.002106108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956184,0.0010609402,0.0005761382,0.0018224706,0.00007711647,0.000048815633,0.00003996734,0.000011610103,0.00074452325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854213,0.000029738387,0.00047979454,0.0006272191,0.000017615665,0.0003034922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992353,0.00008491027,0.00017711845,0.00023358174,0.000002453459,0.00026664717],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041192016,0.00018207048,0.00034540182,0.000023721079,0.00034205127,0.0001349679,0.00015050349,0.00013375324,0.0012389466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117271506,0.00015186628,0.000055967535,0.00003833615,0.00017114922,0.0001985124,0.00033789375,0.00011985282,0.00014716874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016652988,0.000056767367,0.98070675,0.000013284865,0.00003326514,0.00000384164,0.0002471716,0.0015282263,0.0000057209872,0.016694684,0.000034197594,0.0006594329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005312135,0.00008834598,0.93651074,0.000002038551,0.000007402166,0.000027785232,0.0005927854,0.0015983263,0.000023157905,0.048347093,0.012055396,0.00021570052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057623573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086468493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073789695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027420363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183380809","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107147","title":"The provision of drinking water in First Nations communities and Ontario municipalities: Insight into the emergence of water sharing arrangements","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Water supply; Geography; Potable water; Economic growth; Economics; Environmental science; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.0258030149207484,"score_gpt":0.24906510411169003,"score_spread":0.22326208919094162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183380809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989323,0.000051495022,9.650441e-7,0.001462108,0.00014683575,0.00011139019,0.0000014031203,0.000003107731,0.008899679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798876,0.0010044626,0.00004322211,0.00009042639,0.000020124691,0.000014122086,0.000005400901,0.0000024653687,0.000830998],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993624,0.00007453441,0.00025695926,0.00008528819,0.000054497592,0.0001663118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954605,0.00018423409,0.00005982017,0.00015277536,0.00004105062,0.000016064287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044985526,0.000056316338,0.000118477335,0.000018403247,0.00070387917,0.000054553337,0.00030841303,0.000057528418,0.0004973839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004746392,0.000026978361,0.000030228295,0.000034394245,0.00032351556,0.00017092821,0.0003403868,0.00012450368,0.0000016352544],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000121024395,0.000037100304,0.21672441,0.00001597707,0.000023489105,7.675136e-7,0.74808085,0.0006935843,0.00011045096,0.033933785,0.000028738206,0.0003387237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071000255,0.00014652895,0.33383146,0.00012248347,0.000024683013,0.000001052977,0.31536064,0.00058578263,0.013881289,0.085429244,0.24957085,0.00033599624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052392233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9430207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89062846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008548104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004378467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.953918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190574856","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107170","title":"What drives clearing of old-growth forest over secondary forests in tropical shifting cultivation systems? Evidence from the Peruvian Amazon","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Clearing; Secondary forest; Clearance; Geography; Agroforestry; Old-growth forest; Amazon rainforest; Floodplain; Shifting cultivation; Old field; Forestry; Agriculture; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Business","score_opus":0.02032589800195053,"score_gpt":0.2063729794049017,"score_spread":0.18604708140295118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190574856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975897,0.00010511206,0.000043489064,0.0014009967,0.0002146259,0.00020794531,0.000004725505,0.0000121552,0.00042125842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988224,0.00032746504,0.00017284745,0.00049104163,0.000050918432,0.000008647622,0.0000098127775,0.0000043276364,0.000112558126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900895,0.000111490044,0.00029737444,0.00032037517,0.00008435545,0.00017745394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991773,0.00044848296,0.00013705382,0.00018094065,0.000012537314,0.000043701755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021482316,0.00010019021,0.00017135215,0.000018343759,0.00013861085,0.00013368884,0.00025413668,0.00009097669,0.00068993814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002590511,0.0000770624,0.00006517929,0.00009986511,0.00014745154,0.0004448675,0.00052709744,0.00014729661,0.00004307605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013548835,0.000049445323,0.9910439,0.000010052308,0.000010052865,0.000005432245,0.0008500477,0.007130269,0.000057500638,0.00019113372,0.000059723534,0.0005788789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000246617,0.000034955985,0.98484755,0.00005278658,0.000009259588,6.4161367e-7,0.0023909379,0.011272221,0.000045199868,0.00047956867,0.0005236712,0.00009658609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010299374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01367769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012647753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025319876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013650177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76324725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198551001","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107206","title":"Socio-ecological transition in a Mediterranean agroecosystem: What energy flows tell us about agricultural landscapes ruled by landlords, peasants and tourism (Mallorca, 1860-1956-2012)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Agriculture; Peasant; Agroecosystem; Agrarian society; Tourism; Economic rent; Prosperity; Firewood; Natural resource economics; Geography; Agroforestry; Agricultural economics; Economics; Business; Market economy; Environmental science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.005060497336348677,"score_gpt":0.18135474180793004,"score_spread":0.17629424447158137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198551001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948684,0.0005758058,0.000023045704,0.0023290273,0.00023044347,0.0002761311,0.000047019406,0.000046047633,0.0016040877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951506,0.0024994705,0.00014611796,0.0011759008,0.00014914574,0.00006594205,0.00028014078,0.000012309875,0.0005203334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769825,0.0002603446,0.00052335806,0.0007473412,0.0001302055,0.00064048066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918574,0.00018430914,0.00012997784,0.0001750868,0.0000076484475,0.00031722602],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033094382,0.00035345572,0.0005380974,0.0000227425,0.00022197183,0.00019445285,0.00022210815,0.0004746371,0.005629973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049967366,0.00024816263,0.0001561281,0.00011207829,0.0001915716,0.0010360761,0.00024035934,0.00030557747,0.00012939848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014242794,0.0172581,0.6762114,0.00049917336,0.00070312724,0.0030057302,0.015376319,0.07469815,0.028742086,0.0008324555,0.09760414,0.08364503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014918215,0.0003397814,0.9733277,0.000019959049,0.00003612438,0.00013356986,0.0038216212,0.0024829484,0.00022847237,0.00072904734,0.016787956,0.00060100155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016407293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005065922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29711628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074960565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015224238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214609504","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107250","title":"Low agricultural potential exacerbates the effect of temperature on civil conflicts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Civil Conflict; Climate change; Economics; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Development economics; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.007531459204382038,"score_gpt":0.21878734197032182,"score_spread":0.2112558827659398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214609504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656842,0.00003477119,0.000001032864,0.0056700264,0.00039014488,0.0003088427,0.0000104159635,0.000038673825,0.027861929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723387,0.0000732863,0.000013667106,0.0005460733,0.00020956731,0.000020764244,0.000013124662,0.0000055329783,0.0018841429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881405,0.00037337554,0.00019363798,0.00024583115,0.000099710196,0.0002733931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993583,0.0003017609,0.000075941294,0.00016237085,0.000030116997,0.00007153698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047166017,0.00012406387,0.00022952825,0.000016067615,0.00038658007,0.00016601026,0.00030470718,0.00013564344,0.0007912515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011332358,0.000070184054,0.00014979477,0.00009262107,0.00030193225,0.000059664133,0.0000793307,0.00018522752,0.000076582844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002057349,0.0041779373,0.08379569,0.00081454683,0.0032295026,0.0007960429,0.07396515,0.2590951,0.029206805,0.4408951,0.061105795,0.04086098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025238888,0.0018021421,0.45455295,0.000048921764,0.00014452894,0.000010146784,0.004585596,0.00015434912,0.032967053,0.0014369013,0.50106543,0.0007080668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039397688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010065311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43995968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101280944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034150704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8663649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214662066","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107272","title":"The Intersection of Biophysical Economics and Political Economy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Income distribution; Economy; Geography","score_opus":0.011886318393919772,"score_gpt":0.24099412963602887,"score_spread":0.2291078112421091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214662066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8762495,0.00003205742,0.000013099141,0.0041400897,0.0001429437,0.000057887144,0.0000047886006,0.000015222805,0.11934441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988101,0.00012526917,0.00009972539,0.00040898263,0.00009060945,0.000016380542,0.0000076076744,0.000007664789,0.00043362819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988471,0.00010766795,0.00033300475,0.00029530752,0.000018322571,0.0003985828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988604,0.00058689236,0.000057271707,0.00025147316,0.00008681431,0.00015710377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024442587,0.00011075471,0.00024339501,0.000017205737,0.00016252941,0.000074529955,0.00015825359,0.00015106268,0.00013830807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028239156,0.00008669247,0.00011419375,0.00005060391,0.00046717076,0.00009811737,0.00024679746,0.00017131,0.000023002905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004845851,0.00009096767,0.00047738574,0.000007633437,0.000037863665,0.000003467821,0.000014533422,0.0012590593,0.000018564488,0.99144655,0.000027094762,0.0065683974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041735452,0.0001939707,0.008583403,0.0000017642526,0.000010740643,0.000028821794,0.0010760438,0.014525151,0.0017885364,0.84863245,0.12458129,0.00016044793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009622277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070826925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1428141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029298125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018671308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35352162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205927185","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107337","title":"A new accounting framework for assessing forest footprint of nations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Eusko Jaurlaritza; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Natural resource economics; Supply chain; Ecological footprint; Agriculture; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Economics; Sustainability; Agricultural economics; Geography; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.017668737998521422,"score_gpt":0.26658558434678326,"score_spread":0.24891684634826183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205927185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98309696,0.000004644768,0.011345707,0.00042837343,0.000111236084,0.0003117553,0.00000946366,0.000015552774,0.0046763048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95902437,0.0000030022657,0.040480897,0.00020260656,0.000027863138,0.00006492879,0.0000057037255,0.000007456282,0.00018315595],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926573,0.000027195869,0.00023191661,0.00020711598,0.00005537415,0.00021266183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992893,0.00035827627,0.00013430411,0.00014673187,0.0000019151591,0.00006949112],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003645269,0.000077002216,0.00013804942,0.000021229753,0.00031958317,0.000027339145,0.00021405848,0.00005145467,0.003936978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029537707,0.000077770375,0.00009089595,0.00008210737,0.00008237279,0.000118678094,0.00049758924,0.00013677684,0.00001038389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022175567,0.00026272584,0.82613796,0.000008193386,0.000010278735,7.2366066e-7,0.00021171657,0.120428935,0.000106521155,0.037726566,0.00015495146,0.014929256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020793112,0.00014604736,0.81746364,9.2348233e-7,0.000007801624,0.0000019698605,0.0007906981,0.004038691,0.00009692744,0.1676625,0.009458946,0.00012392068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000059531492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000106311396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12993594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007387657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002647248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291824470","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107586","title":"Slouching or speeding toward net zero? Evidence from COVID-19 energy-related stimulus policies in the G20","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Monetary Fund","keywords":"Stimulus (psychology); Gross domestic product; Energy policy; Economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Renewable energy; Economic growth; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09038587769700672,"score_gpt":0.2567182668029219,"score_spread":0.1663323891059152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291824470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783714,0.0011093487,0.000777496,0.010903334,0.00093424827,0.00033330597,0.0003710453,0.000086920685,0.0071129072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98583174,0.0011735829,0.0005033729,0.011269795,0.00017718098,0.00022709754,0.00007715228,0.00004917895,0.0006909087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963131,0.00020026045,0.0015480042,0.0011210922,0.000054754455,0.0007627658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960963,0.0021086626,0.0008666645,0.00067270483,0.0000044171966,0.0002512228],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021594604,0.0003869008,0.0008282195,0.00032141653,0.00053326745,0.00021792711,0.0015377534,0.00022814877,0.0074041565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011703842,0.0003723959,0.00023761185,0.0003194712,0.00020284162,0.0004703238,0.00088785135,0.0006790668,0.0003424804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018109004,0.00040937206,0.2710306,0.000016214475,0.00012140306,0.00008685196,0.003904612,0.34865013,0.00001640957,0.3700647,0.0050785076,0.0004400771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002767007,0.0007236868,0.31423154,0.000014506299,0.000031061103,0.00006777481,0.0028220168,0.069438845,0.00002330847,0.4146099,0.19377999,0.0014903371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003956706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009606674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27921128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023452262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011376413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308153131","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107609","title":"Public preferences for marine plastic litter management across Europe","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Microplastics and Plastic Pollution","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Horizon 2020; HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme","keywords":"Marine Strategy Framework Directive; Water Framework Directive; Willingness to pay; Marine debris; European union; Plastic pollution; Environmental resource management; Nexus (standard); Contingent valuation; Directive; Macro; Empirical evidence; Baltic sea; Public economics; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Business; Economics; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Pollution; International trade; Biology; Engineering; Water quality","score_opus":0.03227097351513488,"score_gpt":0.21085233046492785,"score_spread":0.17858135694979296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308153131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97637445,0.0000029200753,0.0014799511,0.0003451884,0.00066589337,0.0002765422,0.00017553715,0.00003071959,0.020648822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960243,0.000028050712,0.0013545937,0.00056767865,0.000045223467,0.00016250611,0.000056750363,0.000008992619,0.001751882],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899894,0.000035045134,0.00021085572,0.00033128285,0.00005680286,0.00036707122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946195,0.00024092755,0.00008306106,0.0001236884,0.0000035546132,0.0000868081],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028920817,0.000108820714,0.00012238501,0.000016423133,0.00038946938,0.00006359461,0.0002958954,0.000032824184,0.017900111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007403168,0.00009866309,0.00004509878,0.000078337056,0.00008397938,0.000070734415,0.0011852703,0.00011049126,0.0004433259],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082054944,0.0030732516,0.32705006,0.00010016451,0.00031686897,0.00007673544,0.0005472208,0.2918819,0.00041678702,0.0926274,0.14057516,0.1425139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005950064,0.00045970952,0.42319852,6.4083525e-7,0.000013502761,0.000009675194,0.00006343294,0.017963143,0.000011969347,0.007967201,0.5494657,0.00025145945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007870924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008611471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40889058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021785976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007593588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98299766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311092030","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107686","title":"Social outcomes of energy use in the United Kingdom: Household energy footprints and their links to well-being","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Overconsumption; Energy poverty; Energy (signal processing); Context (archaeology); Footprint; Economics; Poverty; Ecological footprint; Public economics; Inequality; Natural resource economics; Energy consumption; Distribution (mathematics); Environmental economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Sustainability; Geography; Microeconomics; Ecology; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.045483615986571954,"score_gpt":0.22274770712551087,"score_spread":0.17726409113893893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311092030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956537,0.0000016496268,0.000037423582,0.0011615184,0.00005359091,0.000050727424,0.0000060574444,0.000012229345,0.003023095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99213374,0.000027459306,0.00006834544,0.0075273314,0.000017420505,0.00003532509,0.0000092253895,0.000010267332,0.00017087355],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903816,0.0001548683,0.00023667818,0.00024715398,0.000064819316,0.00025831125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937856,0.00030854688,0.00008601157,0.00016141278,7.107959e-7,0.00006476304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000328451,0.00013302467,0.00020277406,0.000055861034,0.00022227212,0.00002429973,0.00032315514,0.00010362587,0.00057551067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031231797,0.000095539486,0.00005532563,0.00014012042,0.00012591806,0.00008265979,0.000662579,0.00019766137,0.000004735168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000576172,0.00039814215,0.4628288,0.0000012148903,0.00002730673,0.000010620028,0.0008867746,0.48514935,0.0001957843,0.047988914,0.0005393122,0.0019161802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028363845,0.00014766055,0.9201161,5.959128e-7,0.000004486463,0.0000038188523,0.00018011997,0.0007104892,0.00017427586,0.0046727364,0.07354952,0.0001565647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010653335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000963931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48443887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001843143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004317552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6301438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323927867","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107793","title":"Stochastic growth and regime shift risk in renewable resource management","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Norges Forskningsråd; University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Alberta","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Time horizon; Renewable resource; Natural resource economics; Economics; Risk management; Renewable energy; Regime shift; Bioeconomics; Paradigm shift; Endogenous growth theory; Climate change; Growth model; Stochastic modelling; Microeconomics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Fishery; Geography","score_opus":0.013285766246554134,"score_gpt":0.23277491862576,"score_spread":0.21948915237920585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323927867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91662437,0.0000268107,0.000026424968,0.0013730378,0.000049961833,0.00017750307,0.000005149353,0.00010860069,0.08160813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669105,0.0002460285,0.000107332075,0.00017933012,0.00003540879,0.00006676613,0.000015425285,0.000011757955,0.0026469121],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986033,0.00014021137,0.000256263,0.00042623165,0.000055292836,0.00051873276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992347,0.00034229652,0.00004488078,0.00023843754,0.000010432416,0.00012926379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006653681,0.00012740062,0.00022444807,0.00014942778,0.00012834163,0.000050300223,0.00021994584,0.00015466457,0.00014821615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035195384,0.00011944811,0.000046766476,0.0002842511,0.00012810841,0.00007298766,0.00038586842,0.00019748544,0.00014466062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001594605,0.00011401277,0.0069996025,0.000042841348,0.00003819121,0.00010777305,0.00013763412,0.595465,8.676181e-7,0.3909609,0.0006517997,0.005321926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012149559,0.00021241767,0.23165059,0.000008643015,0.000012323214,0.00000353853,0.0011000852,0.024761138,0.000008995939,0.71307945,0.027630769,0.0003170701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012802324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002375154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57070386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017205332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002201032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48709524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362636709","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107825","title":"Robust management strategies promoting ecological resilience and economic efficiency of a mixed conifer-broadleaf forest in Southwest Germany under the risk of severe drought","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Psychological resilience; Resilience (materials science); Net present value; Environmental resource management; Adaptive management; Adaptation (eye); Environmental science; Forest management; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Economics; Agroforestry; Biology; Microeconomics; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.015331614567147055,"score_gpt":0.21852964561398772,"score_spread":0.20319803104684067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362636709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821499,0.000009819716,0.000011547586,0.00030174543,0.0000921411,0.0005339974,0.000019401763,0.000032461234,0.01684899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988847,0.0003277883,0.00021327336,0.000056155855,0.000019212255,0.000043989538,0.000005990225,0.000009663155,0.00043925433],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983987,0.000115854484,0.0005560475,0.00043446576,0.00007224067,0.00042269737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898374,0.00036210965,0.00031372963,0.00027461714,0.00000344797,0.00006236111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089870096,0.00018770658,0.0003155997,0.00008239573,0.00013767574,0.000049690374,0.00048178065,0.000117198826,0.00080577115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037382186,0.0001353119,0.00008014338,0.00021195224,0.00072746695,0.00020262485,0.00074715586,0.00016817743,0.00033786704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025863437,0.00012815848,0.40337268,0.000031163505,0.000023092947,0.000006345843,0.00027430308,0.57366323,0.000008155722,0.021809012,0.00028355303,0.0003744754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045781553,0.00019283,0.9462055,0.000008021692,0.000017955808,0.0000024473493,0.00094429305,0.043062262,0.000009003887,0.008677553,0.00026061267,0.00016172006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039313053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053098653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5428328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015520396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019682338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8822629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376269746","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107885","title":"Tropical mixed-species plantations can outperform monocultures in terms of carbon sequestration and economic return","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt","keywords":"Monoculture; Carbon sequestration; Reforestation; Agroforestry; Afforestation; Productivity; Carbon fibers; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Economics; Biology; Mathematics; Carbon dioxide","score_opus":0.01791207787919026,"score_gpt":0.22304674672001898,"score_spread":0.2051346688408287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376269746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661597,0.0000011996692,2.3312727e-7,0.00059846544,0.00008081148,0.0001233279,0.000016990196,0.00002134692,0.032997925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856937,0.00018418467,0.000060875533,0.000068459085,0.000037322814,0.000016822192,0.000026444917,0.0000040038326,0.001032541],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994233,0.000017047441,0.00021208657,0.00016946717,0.00002133502,0.00015672557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976957,0.000049394177,0.00006002218,0.00007900265,6.101637e-7,0.000041401276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008207442,0.00007771347,0.00013100359,0.000046370104,0.000036758607,0.000021293938,0.000094321964,0.00007124517,0.000439415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014817872,0.00006723995,0.000023405893,0.000048636568,0.00014012297,0.00008406202,0.00009925325,0.00006642653,0.00009262743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011543074,0.00001860528,0.9804457,0.0000047117983,0.0000050884537,0.000002452659,0.0002638527,0.0074390215,0.00008101526,0.010337614,0.00096303894,0.0004273869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018400945,0.000077138415,0.9745932,0.0000014980512,0.000003532756,8.752897e-7,0.000051892028,0.019077118,0.00011349938,0.004249288,0.0015644912,0.000083428386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040130422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012067705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032409646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015610423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000050898316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6734063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378448645","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107896","title":"Are greenspaces too green? Landscape preferences and water use in urban parks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, Government of Western Australia; Department of Environment Regulation, Government of Western Australia; Forrest Research Foundation","keywords":"Groundcover; Lawn; Public park; Geography; Flexibility (engineering); Vegetation (pathology); Urban landscape; Urban park; Environmental resource management; Scale (ratio); Landscaping; Water use; Preference; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Ecology; Mathematics; Cartography","score_opus":0.13261046723804765,"score_gpt":0.210055332050083,"score_spread":0.07744486481203536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378448645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99547625,0.00012136979,0.0000064266474,0.0011749071,0.00020641496,0.00019783425,0.000099013276,0.000053692635,0.0026640985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660254,0.00063087983,0.00009471214,0.0005349935,0.00006961125,0.00005397073,0.00007873445,0.000016369544,0.0019182033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985188,0.000022512968,0.0005368903,0.00052930886,0.000012185096,0.0003802702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993757,0.000117553274,0.00022503977,0.00018688785,0.0000035091332,0.000091317605],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005281025,0.00017194512,0.00041416183,0.0001861112,0.00008614682,0.00010151854,0.00014927374,0.0001927416,0.00078660593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057122674,0.00015836797,0.00006130737,0.000069492635,0.00009278066,0.0004340792,0.00017070663,0.00014602832,0.0022771251],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010049896,0.000042633634,0.9929797,0.000007866796,0.000015959278,0.000004880251,0.00017774833,0.00074153155,0.000003045174,0.004722955,0.0010219493,0.0002717027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047341068,0.000063680876,0.95945305,0.0000034552374,0.0000027878607,0.0000017034888,0.00020098477,0.0064408462,0.000012550188,0.025517767,0.007588891,0.0002408903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015263497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011429898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033526648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101147154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038703415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378637299","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107889","title":"Climate change impacts on Mediterranean fisheries: A sensitivity and vulnerability analysis for main commercial species","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation","keywords":"Climate change; Mediterranean climate; Vulnerability (computing); Temperate climate; Adaptive capacity; Fishery; Food security; Geography; Vulnerability assessment; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Biology; Agriculture; Economics; Psychological resilience","score_opus":0.09625510322514001,"score_gpt":0.292091108649847,"score_spread":0.19583600542470697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378637299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767421,3.4989577e-7,0.000016329624,0.003484429,0.00008242836,0.00038719684,0.00022981426,0.000062469415,0.01899488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828374,0.00018532288,0.000109443296,0.00092770805,0.00013890008,0.000093375806,0.00008162414,0.0000079817655,0.00017187578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878883,0.0001056699,0.00019575557,0.00038477534,0.000068997826,0.00045595583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888504,0.00069372513,0.000052096926,0.00020314819,0.000004674528,0.00016131054],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011435847,0.00013075159,0.00030926336,0.000055384877,0.00023755469,0.00007309472,0.000105597705,0.00010822122,0.0036106429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028372675,0.000110249755,0.00011413734,0.00025320964,0.00031024063,0.00015416575,0.00041732102,0.0001341013,0.000090485235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020096303,0.00010828558,0.96537876,0.000018540237,0.00005019274,0.000016674001,0.00035898024,0.00021903022,0.000020159061,0.00017979708,0.002950566,0.030498065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002211115,0.00028123797,0.96191305,6.0080055e-7,0.000019077674,0.0000010165022,0.00010729342,0.024456283,0.000014141496,0.00039524832,0.012457272,0.00013364703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015656512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008061711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030364418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016597494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004305683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379806329","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107903","title":"Forest adaptation strategies to reconcile timber production and carbon sequestration objectives under multiple risks of extreme drought and windstorm events","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg; Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Diversification (marketing strategy); Natural resource economics; Valuation (finance); Production (economics); Forest management; Carbon sink; Wood production; Environmental science; Business; Environmental resource management; Climate change; Economics; Agroforestry; Ecology; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08717048220809238,"score_gpt":0.27610956145614124,"score_spread":0.18893907924804887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379806329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99372464,0.0000040505106,0.000021162436,0.00032538816,0.00010126594,0.00029778958,0.000003684231,0.000031604497,0.005490405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985821,0.00007852818,0.0003440138,0.00003967526,0.000043150027,0.000028064196,0.000012105163,0.000005933597,0.0008664157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994111,0.00002598723,0.00015613639,0.00023689018,0.000038417016,0.00013146552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997513,0.00004765794,0.0000734416,0.00007771097,0.000004609923,0.00004523908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018964129,0.00008240706,0.0001014606,0.000040694442,0.000060015464,0.0000217388,0.000045232806,0.00005932598,0.00012114174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059443384,0.00007727753,0.000014648727,0.00009167823,0.00008306324,0.00027393323,0.000084913336,0.000044196313,0.00006071982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057582507,0.00006804919,0.5884284,0.00001889408,0.00002254342,8.5028245e-7,0.0015408113,0.4031632,0.0005654468,0.0024020441,0.00055014045,0.0031820638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120071076,0.00015797997,0.94213617,0.0000036194097,0.000007357132,7.5781537e-7,0.00040010875,0.049655773,0.000071414484,0.0070050894,0.00034414776,0.00009751561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056568556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007569601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3537078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009878309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009345591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4224015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380765023","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107917","title":"Ship-owner response to carbon taxes: Industry and environmental implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bunker; Tonne; Natural resource economics; Agriculture; Economics; Environmental science; Agricultural economics; Business; Waste management; Engineering","score_opus":0.014390156892484143,"score_gpt":0.21734727030696546,"score_spread":0.2029571134144813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380765023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98918366,0.0000018148746,0.000006654468,0.0036745414,0.000043370637,0.00018046344,0.00006447383,0.00005830715,0.0067867353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99490315,0.000030751067,0.0001927723,0.00062875374,0.000018152607,0.000050731098,0.000015841379,0.0000088626675,0.004150971],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991008,0.000032222397,0.00018615322,0.00035790403,0.00003903052,0.00028391325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940026,0.00010802672,0.000030089626,0.0002017603,6.375443e-7,0.00025920843],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034840137,0.00010623839,0.000116781,0.00003750145,0.00015484466,0.00002034042,0.00016372663,0.0001873134,0.0045788884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004287805,0.00008207137,0.000029854911,0.000130878,0.00014044587,0.000049740585,0.00021094606,0.00017378059,0.00066736457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014628872,0.00029058027,0.95106244,0.0000030610354,0.000009551989,0.000019755045,0.00038637657,0.014565487,0.0077315476,0.0002977725,0.004942712,0.02054442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012192424,0.000094394374,0.95449287,0.0000011386686,0.0000038645944,0.000004914349,0.00011162737,0.0024093085,0.000050925148,0.0005569399,0.042007152,0.00014491702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035974514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003557725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037064437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014091514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009035335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99633104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386322616","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107974","title":"The complex relationships between non-food agriculture and the sustainable bioeconomy: The French case","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; European Regional Development Fund; Laboratoire d'Excellence Dynamiques Territoriales et Spatiales","keywords":"Commodification; Sustainability; Agriculture; Diversity (politics); Competition (biology); Value (mathematics); Sustainable agriculture; Capitalism; Business; Economics; Natural resource economics; Political science; Geography; Economy; Ecology","score_opus":0.030418925418775767,"score_gpt":0.2052202370313909,"score_spread":0.1748013116126151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386322616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91451275,0.00007808943,0.0000014532422,0.08205595,0.0000798258,0.0008316032,0.000033924065,0.00006245134,0.0023439545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643403,0.00015554401,0.000018595705,0.00072964176,0.00023585332,0.00019789094,0.000052977968,0.0000011603679,0.00217429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998341,0.00030869944,0.0004126684,0.00035659785,0.000041928648,0.00053910696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99515265,0.0043850048,0.00014630634,0.00013854401,0.000065830405,0.00011165011],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024850403,0.00018711889,0.0002556517,0.000009199834,0.0037433137,0.0004025302,0.00048302664,0.00020154183,0.00012579598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030423244,0.000044809047,0.00012299977,0.00025808622,0.0007439939,0.00012151677,0.00044380766,0.0004155022,0.0000907617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015498772,0.00020294375,0.24533434,0.000053259457,0.00057993317,0.00017611853,0.0041521224,0.00053184066,0.00001723628,0.5488476,0.082145266,0.11780431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023623016,0.00009844741,0.61931217,7.1655006e-7,0.000013944963,0.00004117593,0.01307823,0.00028132432,0.0000036400713,0.031186612,0.33560348,0.00014401658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024111701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004717568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51766104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012358621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034708195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386395378","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107978","title":"Indigenous people's perceptions of benefits and costs of China's second phase of the grain for green program and the influencing factors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Sichuan Agricultural University; University of Toronto","keywords":"Ordered probit; Probit model; Multivariate probit model; Perception; China; Safety net; Indigenous; Sustainability; Psychological intervention; Public economics; Socioeconomics; Economics; Economic inequality; Psychology; Demographic economics; Inequality; Geography; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.056119187511537695,"score_gpt":0.2445566391289194,"score_spread":0.1884374516173817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386395378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99764025,0.00016088122,0.000012462313,0.00019348932,0.00009097619,0.0009115653,0.00067972456,0.000009789678,0.00030087994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912924,0.0005250583,0.00010502255,0.000038036305,0.000015088935,0.00008148397,0.000030395895,0.000010602884,0.000065089844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989564,0.00002220935,0.0006243677,0.00022048644,0.0000126640825,0.00016386081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989765,0.00025530736,0.0005430398,0.00017756337,0.000009024088,0.000038532617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006829456,0.000110888344,0.00043508608,0.000074485695,0.00013067815,0.0000132118275,0.00016474306,0.000103669576,0.00011072672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009846605,0.00008217499,0.000125446,0.00008523654,0.0003296528,0.00009918302,0.00013341857,0.00007677778,0.0000040229415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041919026,0.00015553446,0.9426669,0.00005027784,0.00007157149,2.674102e-8,0.0036276372,0.0008511279,0.00003150719,0.043899562,0.0000181353,0.008585832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015916163,0.00025663932,0.983511,0.0000063184457,0.0000149965035,9.408436e-7,0.0006931897,0.004399325,0.00006250249,0.00926566,0.00010635619,0.000091510745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019962498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006218391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04084408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007115144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014080301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3350999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386435029","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107964","title":"Bird feeding and biodiversity: The decline of the Willow Tit","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Willow; Habitat; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Trophic cascade; Biodiversity; Habitat destruction; Competition (biology); Predator; Biology; Ornithology; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Demography; Southern Hemisphere","score_opus":0.022821693917852034,"score_gpt":0.21085489022207896,"score_spread":0.18803319630422693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386435029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99251515,0.0000066547905,4.4392112e-7,0.0059522726,0.00012649834,0.00008444399,0.0000045750317,0.000036785186,0.0012731738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987229,0.00015754969,0.000028641076,0.00088225614,0.000010577152,0.000003984319,2.184548e-7,0.0000023606287,0.0001915057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960977,0.000018076156,0.00009528387,0.00012662675,0.000024702322,0.00012553735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997102,0.00013738687,0.00005331993,0.00007716867,0.0000018967903,0.000020048416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022017855,0.00005309426,0.00009413364,0.0000070094475,0.0002997381,0.0000069334824,0.00019534797,0.000057150784,0.0005660481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053629934,0.000027806078,0.00004005997,0.00008171247,0.0005698535,0.00003826697,0.00097247603,0.00007793176,0.0005903967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005153237,0.000016724824,0.99567103,6.815688e-7,0.000005946861,8.529562e-7,0.00006607573,0.00013109737,0.00008943755,0.00027810058,0.0030641519,0.0006707647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081414204,0.000052703916,0.99205506,4.771518e-7,0.000011795689,0.0000013868013,0.00018163938,0.00019183311,0.0000342857,0.00083547464,0.006513846,0.000040105147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005278849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013591951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062077544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034564375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030095207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75885516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386493203","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107986","title":"Two currencies – Rethinking energy and the economy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Interdependence; Computable general equilibrium; Laws of thermodynamics; Energy (signal processing); Neoclassical economics; Capital (architecture); General equilibrium theory; Value (mathematics); Economy; Macroeconomics; Physics; Non-equilibrium thermodynamics; Thermodynamics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02692246168608455,"score_gpt":0.26449722151356897,"score_spread":0.2375747598274844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386493203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75954556,0.00013755738,0.000014904065,0.0063203536,0.00020835869,0.000101800986,0.0000029710595,0.00017385167,0.23349464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954921,0.00050482387,0.000050763578,0.0012948863,0.00011731747,0.00008245468,0.000014324067,0.000009844471,0.0024334746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871653,0.00020009138,0.00026565217,0.0003286062,0.000039039656,0.0004500502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985395,0.0009964557,0.000054495278,0.00026479992,0.000043115317,0.00010164835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010268693,0.00013463841,0.0002632194,0.000059677066,0.00033911038,0.00012763895,0.00031218235,0.00012485587,0.00033492307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004462115,0.00009009602,0.00009876359,0.00016019841,0.0005880293,0.00012441857,0.00041138433,0.00017489561,0.00010341633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057238223,0.000015080812,0.00053633336,0.0000052869987,0.000023742747,0.000006967637,0.00013841888,0.01294844,6.131557e-7,0.9753005,0.00036311496,0.010604247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008106179,0.000033810833,0.0013362762,0.000001194207,0.0000046446876,0.000005568034,0.00038806038,0.028110426,0.000014125976,0.76712954,0.20205246,0.00011329234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006272307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025605417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23594655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011698965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069443515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3674009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390122601","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108072","title":"Estimating the relationship between EROI and profitability of oil sands mining, 1997–2016","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Profitability index; Economics; Context (archaeology); Premise; Production (economics); Oil sands; Energy (signal processing); Econometrics; Crude oil; Renewable energy; Natural resource economics; Microeconomics; Asphalt; Ecology; Finance; Mathematics; Petroleum engineering; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06219259573469365,"score_gpt":0.30744481082308656,"score_spread":0.2452522150883929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390122601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878343,0.00001924467,0.000007636338,0.0023644469,0.00007131382,0.00007592945,0.00001692436,0.000065581866,0.009544664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980632,0.000008281981,0.0006270235,0.000042203308,0.00008181078,0.000037386402,0.000026856078,0.000007466833,0.0011057752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987999,0.00018541793,0.00036961224,0.00027132308,0.00005847421,0.00031523974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621123,0.0032482785,0.000090915724,0.0003182319,0.000046691224,0.00008468101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014237103,0.000102545004,0.00023459933,0.00004199349,0.00024270272,0.000031256914,0.00027123542,0.00016896891,0.00009820859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057341135,0.000070881826,0.00006608607,0.00019226952,0.00035831993,0.00008305727,0.00035398215,0.00018984222,0.00003830589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024153256,0.000031259922,0.9151121,0.000055243214,0.00002058483,0.0000012724271,0.00020157218,0.012059624,0.0000014061104,0.05514022,0.00028735923,0.017065216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021696683,0.00008905365,0.86155754,0.000005349885,0.000007732537,0.0000010551998,0.00032408987,0.012081657,0.000011223105,0.124147214,0.0014714749,0.000086670116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012424284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017584002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069006994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096782525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000867811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68646836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396840778","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108219","title":"Renewable energy and well-being in remote Indigenous communities of Canada: A panel analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Renewable energy; Indigenous; Business; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Economic growth; Economics; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.010737180742003463,"score_gpt":0.17856098858590677,"score_spread":0.1678238078439033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396840778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634949,0.000060406117,0.000075852986,0.000113853894,0.000038402173,0.00002502939,0.0000033483311,0.000009183157,0.03617902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976174,0.00066767493,0.00027727883,0.00031636588,0.0000075347252,0.0000019650538,0.000009557847,0.0000052731334,0.0010969116],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934447,0.000042775628,0.0002041917,0.00014601123,0.00004021071,0.00022232493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960226,0.00015338266,0.000037440197,0.00013456742,5.814124e-7,0.00007175444],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019645128,0.0000897576,0.00020230583,0.00005526643,0.00006677408,0.000016359952,0.00011514698,0.000074745054,0.0012813499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008406199,0.000081268714,0.000035274443,0.00015488482,0.000116498064,0.000087895154,0.00016022095,0.000072935676,0.0000042830516],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008399786,0.000034352313,0.08356046,0.000006416052,0.00007426046,0.000024330875,0.0007150334,0.91276777,0.00003719835,0.0005475773,0.0001833057,0.002040886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017692105,0.00011844677,0.88834184,0.000012285228,0.00008167498,0.00000929242,0.00055731466,0.07864806,0.0004555619,0.00972092,0.021579461,0.00029823798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6878585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9751946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83411974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036394616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003161965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399702178","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108259","title":"Texas water markets: Understanding their trends, drivers, and future potential","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Water trading; Water scarcity; Scarcity; Population; Water use; Water resources; Business; Agriculture; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Economics; Geography; Water conservation; Ecology; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.009520393304712958,"score_gpt":0.16018515588463622,"score_spread":0.15066476257992326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399702178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93261427,0.00038645658,0.00573246,0.0019343765,0.0016932992,0.00014723746,0.000016467717,0.00065164093,0.056823794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975763,0.0009182665,0.00020001602,0.000054768796,0.00035567704,0.000002352518,0.00004361022,0.000017631935,0.00083136023],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995348,0.000009201928,0.00010824176,0.00015577918,0.000015822781,0.0001761777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998799,0.00001288514,0.0000057332104,0.000059242768,0.0000016669279,0.000040575196],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000073440075,0.00010846374,0.000098857345,0.00008815048,0.000044853557,0.00018950617,0.000064589854,0.000087551474,0.00096844527],"category_scores_gemma":[4.995763e-7,0.00007442618,0.000041045896,0.000033800203,0.000025221292,0.00014711922,0.000056134086,0.00009074652,0.00005783269],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012418912,0.000108773456,0.0018322137,0.0004555671,0.0010653343,0.00020808284,0.0024494422,0.7877924,0.00015693321,0.0608856,0.045730475,0.099190995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027811242,0.000033865486,0.0029639069,0.0000055749947,0.000027669666,0.0000060198895,0.00025736095,0.7326112,0.000073115545,0.0038958306,0.25961402,0.00023330913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.7440208e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004224321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21388356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011336031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000011322113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400857209","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108306","title":"The economic cost of a 130 km/h speed limit: Insights for cost-benefit analyses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Transportation Planning and Optimization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Economics; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08272224197730789,"score_gpt":0.35587882163128537,"score_spread":0.2731565796539775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400857209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704241,0.00051089184,0.0011179722,0.0034003945,0.0015789934,0.0010386029,0.00021187306,0.00014929881,0.02156788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689007,0.0011373416,0.00046394035,0.00012982672,0.00018327769,0.000048083104,0.00006616484,0.000008453616,0.0010728427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922097,0.00003198126,0.0003217164,0.00020150791,0.000032892207,0.00019093856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854666,0.0011532025,0.00010260382,0.00009073768,0.000037305792,0.00006951831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036483802,0.00008152619,0.00016862458,0.000049744427,0.00037053728,0.00015307833,0.00018730646,0.00012049296,0.00017310104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098664874,0.000060646664,0.0001221435,0.00006978545,0.00018313673,0.00014819393,0.000008995917,0.000069522815,0.000051462375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007588425,0.000042003245,0.0015136059,0.00001537909,0.00011495808,0.0000020514906,0.0022258451,0.32664937,0.000012020483,0.65629447,0.0023955393,0.010658885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049318396,0.00017587951,0.022551987,0.000018835184,0.000094282004,5.6638305e-7,0.0026040466,0.16699144,0.00019752939,0.024254492,0.7823245,0.0002932784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014103057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00601878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7799289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020522789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021573206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33586207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401982876","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108361","title":"Energy constraints on macroeconomic paradigms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Energy (signal processing); Natural resource economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.017429510791528668,"score_gpt":0.2594300123014051,"score_spread":0.24200050150987645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401982876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47556955,0.00009463256,0.000074722906,0.0016830582,0.0006483666,0.000073022034,0.000019555377,0.00023328753,0.5216038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942063,0.00017817228,0.00007702175,0.0013221449,0.00024316563,0.000055683973,0.000029189552,0.000023324832,0.0038649777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983137,0.00011283886,0.00034353783,0.0006022727,0.000049169812,0.0005784485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885243,0.0005658919,0.000028714501,0.00031584786,0.000020478728,0.00021661412],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035202937,0.0002147614,0.00028998507,0.00010651635,0.00011844021,0.00018851209,0.00032200557,0.00026456986,0.0069076237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012467291,0.00018809305,0.00018780258,0.00009628279,0.00038261057,0.00012855328,0.00011394998,0.00027348215,0.0014876527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003593858,0.000077927805,0.00005424599,0.000009672919,0.000042294498,0.000039801158,0.000013217497,0.01433236,0.0000050302024,0.78172916,0.00060733635,0.20305301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023761646,0.00028613096,0.0009753202,0.0000064622736,0.0000061793125,0.000020976677,0.000057303838,0.031439688,0.00015880795,0.3430266,0.62353426,0.00025063741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015233626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003820205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62292695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005341761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015293134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402536306","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108375","title":"Buzzword or breakthrough beyond growth? The mainstreaming of the Wellbeing Economy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstreaming; Inclusive growth; Natural resource economics; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Political science; Poverty","score_opus":0.019141238723208703,"score_gpt":0.2793148974564997,"score_spread":0.26017365873329096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402536306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64318377,0.00019202866,0.00012714637,0.005675972,0.0030804765,0.00030459565,0.000018433178,0.00011171025,0.34730586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916143,0.00011065596,0.0001402934,0.0025981078,0.00040962623,0.00006995264,0.0000045381453,0.000023683006,0.0050288476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982227,0.00022106079,0.00056203204,0.00053278415,0.00004709129,0.0004143027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794096,0.0013107564,0.00017112432,0.00048334763,0.000022500775,0.000071325514],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006017847,0.00022488431,0.00031214222,0.00005229184,0.00025754076,0.00010350354,0.0005579867,0.00029449063,0.004618679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012086965,0.00011179849,0.0002659568,0.00021872962,0.0003774389,0.00012403475,0.0001235664,0.0005249021,0.000536443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021255399,0.00031069978,0.01803152,0.000055822362,0.00042388393,0.000045732566,0.0014497385,0.00036310774,0.00008324506,0.9095306,0.027345391,0.042147737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010034177,0.00059748685,0.34503192,0.00006944009,0.00014563731,0.00029094768,0.0016909121,0.0012507781,0.00035171316,0.24945101,0.3994736,0.0006431287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000080013255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011221967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66007954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013149992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051802574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942731","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108403","title":"Broadening ecological footprint and biocapacity research: A co-developed research agenda with Canadian stakeholders","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Environmental resource management; Footprint; Geography; Environmental planning; Economics; Ecology; Sustainability; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.40388152238816144,"score_gpt":0.376284357483259,"score_spread":0.027597164904902438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759692,0.00012468005,5.4330917e-7,0.011262977,0.00012065092,0.0005839494,0.00003201216,0.00010500751,0.011800969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831045,0.00019796214,0.00015777542,0.00018427976,0.00016485565,0.00008337568,0.000023246856,0.0000026643427,0.0008753787],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969696,0.00059094164,0.0003139973,0.0008501296,0.00020566327,0.001069659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788374,0.0011796545,0.00002747748,0.000104436825,0.00020480812,0.0005999113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038930348,0.00018932842,0.0002774027,0.0001202499,0.0009865526,0.00054877606,0.00032647388,0.00032309908,0.00071731297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005306394,0.00007704343,0.000069133515,0.00064827077,0.0010606471,0.00013046864,0.00018022975,0.0010522222,0.00006889669],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006666303,0.0013782341,0.06348977,0.00027944232,0.0003725919,0.0011443511,0.0026404974,0.00031449422,0.0046672076,0.08862454,0.022354925,0.8140673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003097252,0.00333756,0.584129,0.000039316652,0.0000105855415,0.00013197835,0.037981547,0.0009094442,0.00037621,0.01658366,0.35552332,0.00066766446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008621959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13969353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8133997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008500377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037468926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403148943","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108413","title":"Over 6 billion liters of Canadian milk wasted since 2012","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; McGill University; École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental science; Business","score_opus":0.01667260457679433,"score_gpt":0.20089465106365625,"score_spread":0.1842220464868619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403148943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99028534,0.00022827373,2.890219e-7,0.0053371373,0.00041675867,0.00014130281,0.000067319306,0.000045262983,0.0034783445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987258,0.00017289733,0.00003392947,0.00025401692,0.00012725955,0.000006703108,0.000028790533,7.355843e-7,0.00064989174],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999174,0.00004237433,0.00022991985,0.000264887,0.000032487515,0.0002563399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955845,0.00014338343,0.000033423803,0.000049393802,0.000029686284,0.00018563884],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002074663,0.00009674609,0.00015755768,0.000055136075,0.000073649906,0.000055684013,0.00013919118,0.00014416853,0.0015941623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048819784,0.000038353493,0.00011311001,0.0003686123,0.000097420125,0.00015557827,0.000036266323,0.00010661328,0.00004003323],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017739995,0.0007148691,0.018708063,0.00020190953,0.00017925998,0.000069732196,0.00069381425,0.0012469266,0.027657712,0.11700498,0.02773238,0.8056129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011127517,0.00054078264,0.2900189,0.000015907843,0.0000128388165,0.000013795426,0.0023045382,0.0030449321,0.00061953504,0.0050303065,0.69797134,0.00031588285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006544458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059629418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8052971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017055434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049251594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404142618","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108444","title":"Extractivist valorization in industrial forestry in the Global North – Elements of an analytical framework and illustration for the cases of Finland and Alberta, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Forestry; Geography; Regional science; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.031799971002626666,"score_gpt":0.24285689442069805,"score_spread":0.2110569234180714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404142618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99713326,0.000022580196,0.0000064726196,0.0023901502,0.000052319698,0.0003022121,0.000056893594,0.000001008456,0.000035097928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975157,0.000020582645,0.000033038377,0.00010260139,0.000041615847,0.000020788246,0.000024706074,2.3293548e-7,0.0000048474053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994364,0.000041269006,0.0002451937,0.0001434026,0.000026090525,0.00010764145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835,0.0015443988,0.00004684661,0.000025361322,0.000010710495,0.000022638833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031249571,0.000058274036,0.00011336993,0.0000046895593,0.000047259233,0.000033288914,0.00007653258,0.000087300265,0.000022681304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000208574,0.000020435971,0.000015518517,0.000082070896,0.00009174312,0.00006989643,0.000024045705,0.000081749335,3.889825e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006591037,0.00007208244,0.9337206,0.000014235249,0.000010542323,0.0000022745412,0.0000798839,0.00021775665,5.238071e-7,0.0137337865,0.000023448718,0.05205896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009220765,0.0001958033,0.9869487,0.000004616821,0.00000614025,0.0000022014824,0.00100337,0.006376732,0.0000034096765,0.0038983256,0.0014224632,0.000046003377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035147112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8672817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83213454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007810174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008019011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97127795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404168846","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108430","title":"Biodiversity disclosure in the European finance sector","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Business; Finance; Economics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.016345520834394327,"score_gpt":0.17997984561716443,"score_spread":0.1636343247827701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404168846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89653975,0.000015775078,0.000020562722,0.006422247,0.00010819347,0.00012153977,0.0000071791646,0.000023502085,0.09674125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406207,0.00011310917,0.000110796725,0.0049923607,0.000017317692,0.000006199505,0.0000061533196,0.00000243661,0.0006895581],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999472,0.00008130712,0.00009721665,0.0002010342,0.000032582302,0.000115831106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980843,0.000047355603,0.000015566788,0.00011165955,2.0018382e-7,0.00001680436],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039893016,0.00006219136,0.000050407787,0.000010636742,0.00005979419,0.000047961392,0.00022249568,0.000021518892,0.0026269872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000067687856,0.00004248634,0.00003488336,0.000064838576,0.000094847856,0.00010751489,0.00020366222,0.0000940113,0.004399384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021987338,0.00065389427,0.5831665,0.000025476022,0.000029209388,0.00039742969,0.0018377996,0.017938787,0.00014804494,0.020989113,0.33071756,0.044074245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051007904,0.000020583915,0.64537096,9.707458e-7,0.0000019396723,0.0000010564848,0.00006139516,0.0005813597,0.0000032732942,0.0006036124,0.353252,0.00005185437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037209626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005112576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09752232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013592937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000015389792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406674094","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108530","title":"Carbon rotation ages and the offset measurement conundrum: An extended review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; University of Victoria; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Offset (computer science); Rotation (mathematics); Carbon fibers; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geodesy; Geography; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.010948149965235498,"score_gpt":0.21077552230636323,"score_spread":0.19982737234112774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406674094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786139,0.0010138227,0.00029501942,0.0035528918,0.00011605674,0.0005826423,0.000001095716,0.000026791316,0.01579779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98341984,0.008999685,0.0012675889,0.0057860166,0.000012092281,0.00007300394,0.000004398271,0.000005572883,0.00043179365],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991787,0.00010169644,0.00023023027,0.00026882545,0.000067000234,0.00015354712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961805,0.000052724656,0.00008029791,0.00019177915,0.0000024609292,0.00005467209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006548251,0.00011366923,0.00020041314,0.0000024261371,0.00011746954,0.000021670698,0.00016117461,0.00005981342,0.00037293535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005537286,0.000075931195,0.000040147224,0.000045212557,0.00042516354,0.00007912557,0.00017045964,0.00009654587,0.000024130331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006133665,0.0015328882,0.28413835,0.00033410193,0.000282375,0.000016593121,0.0006011045,0.11721331,0.00032257457,0.048335757,0.0049950266,0.54161453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015537207,0.00016701638,0.85728794,0.000052366464,0.00010466844,0.000006751831,0.00017046288,0.10765565,0.000015211551,0.018850219,0.013835977,0.0002999957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008982734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017832726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5731496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031332308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069962293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40833807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407630860","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108545","title":"Towards an ecological metaphor for regenerative circular economies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; McGill University","funders":"Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science; Vereniging Trustfonds Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; National Natural Science Foundation of China; C3.ai Digital Transformation Institute; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Princeton University","keywords":"Metaphor; Ecology; Circular economy; Economics; Geography; Economic geography; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Natural resource economics; Economy; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.017163558131646953,"score_gpt":0.2483203366083795,"score_spread":0.23115677847673255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407630860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741556,0.000033086842,0.0016433824,0.0023275109,0.00030368846,0.00088475895,0.000032438824,0.000079220656,0.020540312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99154574,0.000036060508,0.003356247,0.0024565954,0.00008637111,0.0006145151,0.00003837512,0.0000095516625,0.0018565292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975745,0.0001998147,0.00064652273,0.00093462237,0.000050598275,0.0005939412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987427,0.00043584322,0.00016328093,0.000422422,0.000027295373,0.00020842973],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012064362,0.00027834036,0.00068554195,0.0000604623,0.0004763351,0.00012769914,0.00055709993,0.00041313292,0.0077694417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006808515,0.0002204068,0.0003872655,0.00019307323,0.00041759602,0.00032302225,0.0003653937,0.00017220929,0.00022936202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062790007,0.007818721,0.28236616,0.00014666766,0.0012405902,0.000042536267,0.0007027979,0.28709286,0.00061125285,0.3532493,0.01946133,0.046639867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012065852,0.0012293473,0.5463562,0.0000027630545,0.0001757738,0.000004533781,0.0013679437,0.046986792,0.00062220066,0.23531632,0.16595472,0.00077682035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012571886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013517209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26399004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012079227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006081041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408126915","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108549","title":"Degrowth in a settler state: climate-just economic transitions and Reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Degrowth; Indigenous; State (computer science); Climate change; Political science; Environmental ethics; Geography; Political economy; Sociology; Ecology; Sustainability; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.004946268947789132,"score_gpt":0.17786697850006197,"score_spread":0.17292070955227284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408126915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99504,0.000011316367,0.0000033482715,0.0007151867,0.000037996047,0.0002696256,0.00002657264,0.0000072479615,0.0038887223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986628,0.0003077707,0.00015663792,0.0006672387,0.0000037855318,0.000058012145,0.000020221458,0.000005747184,0.00011776946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905455,0.000027121552,0.00025866122,0.0002835803,0.000025103349,0.0003510024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973994,0.00007740924,0.000045411358,0.00007834146,7.4946007e-7,0.000058123886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001464653,0.00012188884,0.00017647892,0.00006147489,0.000078133955,0.000021898253,0.00009121744,0.000053878863,0.0005928304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000795685,0.000116116455,0.000011441454,0.00008748211,0.00007940287,0.00016619316,0.00007787936,0.00010519554,0.000033226526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040917494,0.000038797072,0.96644485,0.0000095074665,0.000004847722,0.000015383204,0.00062623824,0.030673556,0.0000036864874,0.000118466014,0.00007196308,0.0019518029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006779486,0.000031811396,0.99460214,0.0000051449083,0.0000028403706,0.0000031351178,0.0022442427,0.0013049296,0.000027302991,0.0006286038,0.0003238586,0.00014804452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35851073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.631427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004661226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033813546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408348878","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108601","title":"Assessing the nexus between industrialization and inclusive green growth in Africa. The critical role of energy efficiency","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic Growth and Development","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Industrialisation; Green growth; Inclusive growth; Economics; Natural resource economics; Inclusive development; Development economics; Economic growth; Sustainable development; Poverty; Ecology; Biology; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.021882405420952496,"score_gpt":0.2580920472914752,"score_spread":0.23620964187052274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408348878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9332608,0.00029196148,0.031016253,0.012922993,0.00030942564,0.00021726149,0.0000030530148,0.000030536612,0.021947738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987714,0.00002563885,0.0005955827,0.00052079716,0.000039432736,0.000017709192,0.0000012273362,0.0000022277698,0.000025944226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894583,0.00013331496,0.00040058437,0.0002648674,0.00003442169,0.00022096833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982511,0.001396945,0.00009935422,0.00017681182,0.000033809603,0.000041971933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007055389,0.00009595417,0.00020580272,0.00008228126,0.00018425904,0.00015820732,0.0006214034,0.00012131556,0.0000061336254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036575433,0.00006107366,0.0000305252,0.00023304723,0.00017624538,0.00026316987,0.00071038073,0.00014016054,0.000001793098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002729427,0.00004696531,0.05202485,0.0000041605326,0.000010999861,8.1704667e-7,0.00049864454,0.0002487938,0.0000047024937,0.9351735,0.000058977683,0.011924843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040891406,0.00006617912,0.38788858,0.000011926798,0.000009423813,0.0000018146394,0.0004411254,0.05213679,0.00033628955,0.55684155,0.001710972,0.00014644489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006904236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042977732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.378332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010883251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019377706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24905117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413119615","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108740","title":"Accepting and implementing transport pricing policies for climate: A review of evidence and research gaps","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Natural resource economics; Business; Public economics; Environmental economics","score_opus":0.12067978094051017,"score_gpt":0.389571847392505,"score_spread":0.2688920664519948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413119615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98690313,0.005425224,0.00006330131,0.0014012883,0.00003233936,0.0003302645,0.000021521375,0.000020031817,0.0058029266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8897946,0.10800047,0.0010962371,0.0008396108,0.00002633831,0.00008362031,0.000013924046,0.000008047266,0.00013717911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987876,0.000048601676,0.00050872064,0.00025380135,0.000046032408,0.00035524843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988551,0.0008132986,0.00012510596,0.00012368054,0.00003495455,0.000047823767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014108315,0.00010299906,0.00030284686,0.00008908289,0.0002218495,0.00001853612,0.00010583142,0.00006892819,0.00009262303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022813748,0.00008548424,0.00005695653,0.00009615654,0.00017621288,0.00012601608,0.000044903372,0.00009480807,8.489155e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007746438,0.00014400604,0.2422144,0.0127654765,0.00013079922,0.0000018427365,0.0010377144,0.0013151627,0.0017554204,0.7163144,0.00021591362,0.024027418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090360123,0.00028471125,0.908988,0.0028170575,0.00013570541,0.000002971383,0.0012970726,0.00058323296,0.004186545,0.012533784,0.067926645,0.00034065466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025197433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007248317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7037806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043079865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027687454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3485946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413768606","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108742","title":"A new measure of climate transition risk based on distance to a global emission factor frontier","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Measure (data warehouse); Climate change; Climatology; Environmental science; Economics; Natural resource economics; Geography; Geology; Computer science; Oceanography","score_opus":0.037126719336219756,"score_gpt":0.24687686080771065,"score_spread":0.2097501414714909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413768606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87183046,0.00024428006,0.05332317,0.004474134,0.0011275117,0.00066813163,0.0058125514,0.0000855424,0.062434193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99297184,0.0005299522,0.00319763,0.0028909785,0.00011057645,0.000035450263,0.000044765777,0.000017713535,0.00020107243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979482,0.000026165755,0.00091174524,0.0006298603,0.000019359886,0.00046462752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987922,0.00012753854,0.00041369733,0.00041827792,0.000021456703,0.00022686769],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003880098,0.00026128214,0.0007276182,0.0001835754,0.0001311365,0.00006301033,0.00031573657,0.00028447591,0.001013747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023597745,0.00029024426,0.00027291142,0.00021906913,0.000042847452,0.0001286671,0.00006988598,0.00017797016,0.00032924538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027238347,0.001305077,0.42991647,0.00025590995,0.00026717637,0.000005636487,0.00084713515,0.045221698,0.000020299614,0.4680804,0.013192066,0.038164306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062299697,0.0012549851,0.52283126,0.00021198389,0.000067109904,0.0000018662946,0.00024900123,0.13491519,0.0004022253,0.20429042,0.12791343,0.0016325737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016524718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033746965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26378998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006316276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006431521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413805986","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108768","title":"Labour dynamics, harvest cost and sharing behaviour in an Inuit mixed economy: How to adapt to a changing socio-ecological system?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Nunavut; Carleton University","funders":"Queen's University; Polar Knowledge Canada; Genome Canada; Carleton University","keywords":"Sharing economy; Dynamics (music); Ecology; System dynamics; Economics; Geography; Economy; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.03734052232071181,"score_gpt":0.3268610162680441,"score_spread":0.28952049394733226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413805986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781747,0.000021550386,0.00019122989,0.013347807,0.0012078247,0.002993729,0.00014874383,0.00013336822,0.0037810327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873941,0.000027144699,0.000686474,0.007207269,0.00020805918,0.0015703313,0.000030658084,0.000027140888,0.0028488166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961843,0.0002637421,0.0007652959,0.0009036787,0.000030912768,0.0018520548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844015,0.00052483025,0.00019901151,0.0003377952,0.000116660434,0.00038153247],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017658732,0.0003228997,0.0009239223,0.00040291753,0.0022114478,0.00009306279,0.0004534392,0.00065238954,0.00025739922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030562078,0.00031303088,0.000075339245,0.00024481994,0.00007095255,0.00017960441,0.0016208675,0.0006970358,0.00022245593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106967396,0.0002745451,0.81676537,0.00018889588,0.000053251126,0.000043572738,0.010128591,0.0007173147,0.0000042179136,0.17009683,0.0007363659,0.00088406407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011166574,0.00064275373,0.8871439,0.00007174228,0.000026651729,0.000003671593,0.09790349,0.004304418,0.0000015031815,0.0011245987,0.0071921605,0.0004684627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007358162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40331557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40257978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005322491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036490566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414031877","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108782","title":"Climate shocks and banking sector stability: Evidence from El Niño southern oscillation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Oscillation (cell signaling); Economics; Financial stability; El Niño Southern Oscillation; Southern oscillation; Climate change; Natural resource economics; Monetary economics; Climatology; Financial system; Geology; Oceanography; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04304587067494471,"score_gpt":0.23352305587578634,"score_spread":0.19047718520084161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414031877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847959,0.0017371585,0.00065389916,0.0011627292,0.00042614408,0.0002771281,0.0002451548,0.00006559933,0.010636263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969757,0.0011339394,0.0005393799,0.0007835632,0.000117077645,0.000041396816,0.00002115401,0.000015350644,0.00037244105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805504,0.000026927542,0.0007093303,0.0007491876,0.000016326747,0.0004431664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877065,0.00045679783,0.00029081886,0.00037656416,0.00003269938,0.000072439296],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007533535,0.0002090264,0.00052995083,0.00014791664,0.00023144705,0.00016236596,0.00023722801,0.00026105062,0.0020733138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037856837,0.00023214972,0.00011004569,0.00016710802,0.00011621453,0.0003594922,0.00025544406,0.00020711246,0.00028333266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005391284,0.000051316285,0.92030555,0.000031408385,0.000030999225,0.0000027572476,0.00037394144,0.00025006465,0.000007708664,0.076609164,0.00010005324,0.0021831426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005470215,0.00009584295,0.62700725,0.000039583047,0.000013115553,7.773769e-7,0.00055327493,0.013470425,0.00004344623,0.35123056,0.0066363635,0.00036235547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003013598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035813838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2932983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003394639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046032925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415823959","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108842","title":"Fixed capital and growth imperatives: Is commercial aviation trapped in a treadmill?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Aviation; Profitability index; Capital (architecture); Fixed cost; Investment (military); Commercial aviation; Fixed asset; Fixed capital","score_opus":0.008525398701143041,"score_gpt":0.2224778743092361,"score_spread":0.21395247560809305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415823959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99215466,0.000017908937,0.00047823854,0.0021640034,0.000045774086,0.00018685336,0.00000780609,0.000051598145,0.004893157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972715,0.00018238221,0.0011499843,0.001147998,0.000006031971,0.000034551787,0.0000035509497,0.0000031440684,0.00020087049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933946,0.000022936592,0.00018007935,0.00026585246,0.000018998117,0.00017268017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997387,0.000108027954,0.000037382226,0.00008452403,0.0000020631182,0.000029281393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008326449,0.0001025228,0.00016740993,0.0000424552,0.00007501598,0.000020482319,0.00011563197,0.00013405,0.00044614394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007408362,0.00008721229,0.000028050996,0.00009757006,0.00020666105,0.00015330054,0.0001235982,0.00012118517,0.00004795247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007697994,0.00030070217,0.9092678,0.000007175956,0.000016434255,0.000009278425,0.0008536769,0.00022782687,0.00085948844,0.03602165,0.0013280676,0.05103094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005996674,0.00012008333,0.9084076,0.0000024561584,0.0000033731023,0.000001145187,0.0002571525,0.0014185517,0.0011028597,0.08738631,0.0005663105,0.00013447886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000427842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047349575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051364657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018869039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008521329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48849633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415885517","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108843","title":"Resource regimes and the success of local renewable energy projects","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Bundesamt für Energie","keywords":"Renewable energy; Property rights; Resource (disambiguation); Politics; Renewable resource; Energy policy; Revenue; Democracy","score_opus":0.011932539868038494,"score_gpt":0.250019445764464,"score_spread":0.2380869058964255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415885517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41238442,0.00073904323,0.0007269808,0.0072053224,0.00034637505,0.00021523323,0.0000026171194,0.00006439732,0.5783156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823032,0.0010963304,0.00018007266,0.0011222981,0.00013463762,0.00004367895,0.0000015341632,0.0000053529147,0.015112876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988772,0.00027312877,0.0002598899,0.00024664577,0.00006590017,0.0002772222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860513,0.00097290426,0.00015372914,0.00016602484,0.00004479115,0.000057392786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082749996,0.000098080825,0.00031415067,0.00004925305,0.00043785054,0.00006714571,0.0004139379,0.00019542423,0.00012810685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004018395,0.00007187409,0.00007941761,0.0002281601,0.0019230207,0.00010953665,0.0001663637,0.00007585491,0.0000012655333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011783608,0.000047027715,0.0019322763,0.0000065469208,0.000038385115,9.690982e-7,0.00061691145,0.004425424,0.0000019124743,0.96193373,0.007318354,0.023560606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019485359,0.00008240762,0.004381558,0.000024181363,0.000045029312,6.998061e-7,0.033350967,0.001518945,0.0008486196,0.22256789,0.7349517,0.00027951642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019529426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06358073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7393659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001407256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028166713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98699963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417209239","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108878","title":"Ethical trade-offs in fast fashion: Exploring social, environmental, and health dimensions in clothing consumption","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; University of Alberta","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Sustainability; Clothing; Purchasing; Consumption (sociology); Ranking (information retrieval); Sustainable consumption","score_opus":0.21919370596077764,"score_gpt":0.2777004952968769,"score_spread":0.05850678933609926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417209239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98871017,0.00051992387,0.00014191025,0.008791711,0.0002571872,0.00031031124,0.000030547028,0.000020956619,0.0012172922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99083084,0.0052258307,0.00036484184,0.0033502723,0.000031250383,0.00009774045,0.00002997867,0.000013003767,0.000056234952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980756,0.000057451543,0.0009320023,0.00056754914,0.000014255589,0.00035310906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944425,0.00012288868,0.00022328041,0.0001339947,5.6074185e-7,0.00007501292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012336046,0.00017457135,0.0005165974,0.00024438958,0.00017945789,0.000047982587,0.00011694669,0.00031114012,0.000343585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026154814,0.0002242096,0.00006690026,0.00006190297,0.00014849126,0.00026441485,0.00013979446,0.0005351827,0.00019154143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008260859,0.00016076169,0.89161134,0.00001742898,0.0000105774725,0.0000015071369,0.0005527851,0.00074706913,0.000010748657,0.10429445,0.00008114697,0.00250392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092126,0.000054145694,0.98358274,0.00001229545,0.0000018324104,0.0000015158658,0.00053922104,0.003730457,0.000005594704,0.0094114505,0.0015433636,0.00019614669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052334144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003410573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011847066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002011905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9143002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417360022","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109127","title":"Ecological and Economic Impacts of Ocean Deoxygenation on Pacific Halibut Fisheries: A Multidisciplinary Assessment of Projected Losses","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Halibut; Economic impact analysis; Biomass (ecology); Fishing; Overfishing; Biogeochemical cycle; Exclusive economic zone; Marine ecosystem; Abundance (ecology)","score_opus":0.01359875466910911,"score_gpt":0.25728167024402515,"score_spread":0.24368291557491603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417360022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915934,0.000047032347,0.000014375309,0.0008016867,0.00020537386,0.0003914121,0.0001869315,0.000026364138,0.006733424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986927,0.00034080248,0.00067830394,0.00007445396,0.000021578964,0.0000023028142,0.00007305532,0.0000025647091,0.00011422456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988287,0.00015009519,0.00046742888,0.0003164683,0.000043584638,0.0001937064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983725,0.0010830816,0.0002642356,0.00016686006,0.000035529836,0.00007778397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004316361,0.00015009829,0.0003603266,0.00015163443,0.000110666166,0.00005194574,0.00016277714,0.00016592491,0.0006576663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019040583,0.00010845384,0.00007326425,0.00009069747,0.00027340633,0.00017668864,0.000035877332,0.0001174429,0.000010204993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025379885,0.00025119586,0.986901,0.000077578086,0.00005865185,0.000002832729,0.000070325405,0.0060734376,0.00008879097,0.0027101156,0.0004084823,0.0031038239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040626514,0.00089972035,0.9669167,0.000015255431,0.000013662976,0.0000023930418,0.00027838434,0.029493375,0.00027506493,0.0012019023,0.0003844842,0.000112819405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006403346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003534741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023419937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003860464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021072822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7200985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}