{"meta":{"query_hash":"6f4f3ddcca3a","filters":{"venue":"Ecological Economics"},"cohort_total":148,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":148,"exported":148,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6f4f3ddcca3a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Ecological+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W1511624900","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.019","title":"","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Geological formations and processes","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Outcrop; Carbonate; Sedimentary rock; Lithification; Structural basin; Paleontology; Clastic rock; Geomorphology; Geochemistry; Carbonate platform; Carbonate rock; Petrology; Sedimentary depositional environment","score_opus":0.011957884012829602,"score_gpt":0.18391479087556767,"score_spread":0.17195690686273807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511624900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021599482,0.00029289012,0.0053034863,0.0036309937,0.00035570475,0.000037360798,0.00067659735,0.00022242202,0.98732054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03009587,0.00045613042,0.0021408384,0.0011352733,0.00018654471,0.0000443798,0.00067422504,0.000086494096,0.96518034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997038,0.000045900244,0.000010635068,0.000058945006,0.00014256159,0.000038164868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992956,0.00013376132,0.00003493688,0.00017080797,0.00025241973,0.00011250155],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048336823,0.000279481,0.00019607194,0.0010207249,0.0008170841,0.0022932342,0.0005502525,0.00093304564,0.34066007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020799143,0.00012805128,0.00018307484,0.00088867714,0.0006716634,0.0015645988,0.00085021683,0.00082615763,0.1400888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038288632,0.000057091802,0.000863435,0.000052343737,0.000005309868,0.00007846059,0.00015991542,0.00023481857,0.0008134631,0.5382392,0.30222338,0.15723428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007770444,0.000008713738,0.0012017232,0.000030782572,0.0000034810123,0.00011680933,0.00009465274,0.0002716621,0.00059608783,0.07049888,0.9271638,0.000005616625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002166858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034306198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6593399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011155397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010628949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571182591","doi":"","title":"D. Armitage, F. Berkes and N. Doubleday, Editors, Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning and Multi-Level Governance, UBC Press, Vancouver (2007) ISBN 978-0-7748-1390-7 360 pp","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Cooperative Studies and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Management; Regional science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.035543899547117314,"score_gpt":0.22472579603698215,"score_spread":0.18918189648986483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571182591","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002893485,0.9529217,0.0038969119,0.008025807,0.0104224235,0.000017555238,0.00027007438,0.00015762825,0.02399852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003823797,0.91889983,0.005426091,0.0012136517,0.008225538,0.000046407833,0.0005342426,0.00017837014,0.061652012],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990318,0.00018269934,0.00007289774,0.00014747265,0.00050584855,0.000059361835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970367,0.0019391532,0.0001903837,0.000098311335,0.00055130734,0.00018414717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019660606,0.002647928,0.002152864,0.0035352695,0.00086823036,0.0046458133,0.0019895914,0.0023047514,0.028499013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035979012,0.0015049543,0.00068046746,0.003946031,0.0013111464,0.0049447306,0.0013257186,0.0026985635,0.031096546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007842208,0.000031149826,0.00022813611,0.0013982801,0.000025183208,0.00008884276,0.00041760044,0.00041180622,0.00022287916,0.007758506,0.6889151,0.30042413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000563975,0.000007571243,0.0005065146,0.0006971797,0.000017214174,0.00023722471,0.00013021473,0.00015781412,0.000108885775,0.0038884897,0.9942333,0.00000974796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008921792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014745189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028499013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016417619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021075176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0953387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581972668","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.07.008","title":"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.023080649074894148,"score_gpt":0.22349967797619277,"score_spread":0.20041902890129862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581972668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004085043,0.0014348413,0.0011715608,0.008062124,0.0005629465,0.000012906978,0.00050361565,0.00013276018,0.9840342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059743784,0.0017652736,0.00088603306,0.0022954852,0.00032915003,0.00001920718,0.0005940072,0.000063392254,0.93430376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978775,0.000036204445,0.000006835455,0.000037219714,0.00009665252,0.00003538777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940383,0.00012931936,0.000026237769,0.00013515716,0.00019472136,0.00011085508],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048113236,0.0003318473,0.00033662835,0.0010343273,0.00090185355,0.003852612,0.0003744735,0.0015521765,0.2564386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018782949,0.00017230157,0.00021333805,0.00088901084,0.0011626867,0.0016060553,0.00077065954,0.0012793976,0.06596764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009548129,0.00012333147,0.0016960392,0.000085935506,0.000021983684,0.00006498423,0.00012035782,0.00031157263,0.0006449572,0.3475173,0.53052866,0.118789345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015822408,0.000018144512,0.0032121993,0.00007922537,0.000025689702,0.00011307987,0.00018931174,0.00026397835,0.0005616659,0.08994727,0.90556705,0.000006595239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003648364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00753463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7435614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012366852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010907078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881108631","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.001","title":"Setting the limits to extraction: A biophysical approach to mining activities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación","keywords":"Deliberation; Operationalization; Ecosystem services; Natural resource; Conceptualization; Stock (firearms); Process (computing); Business; Computer science; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Economics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04041470841865604,"score_gpt":0.22895177131697564,"score_spread":0.1885370628983196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881108631","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07098303,0.0034304385,0.6216932,0.04408172,0.0003981817,0.00009964991,0.00036690896,0.00013680151,0.25881007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9552725,0.0019913088,0.02591967,0.00096750434,0.00036326298,0.00012319197,0.000038707,0.000075073054,0.015248861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974475,0.0012990494,0.00010446291,0.00035953763,0.00051557506,0.00027383422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934227,0.0044428455,0.000536241,0.0005694717,0.0005994545,0.00042935705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031821476,0.0006715792,0.0010529541,0.0015274341,0.0019646036,0.0075351894,0.0029581813,0.0035867998,0.008385182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013005216,0.0007884747,0.00088320574,0.0016319705,0.010544636,0.011163741,0.0045328685,0.0046511283,0.00049446325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013626754,0.00004053825,0.0005711603,0.00004643024,0.000013669015,0.000065854685,0.00016975768,0.026532374,0.00018266193,0.9650012,0.00082361203,0.0065392707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043921445,0.000007849649,0.0002705705,0.000032734395,0.000006632003,0.000035241206,0.00018209821,0.016131876,0.000072961324,0.9794576,0.0037895148,0.000008438745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003821126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006289428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008385182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034201548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033151174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028051198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964018439","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.008","title":"Navigating coastal values: Participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":317,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Seascape; Ecosystem services; Recreation; Spatial planning; Environmental resource management; Marine spatial planning; Geography; Wildlife; Spatial ecology; Ecosystem; Environmental planning; Ecology; Economics; Habitat","score_opus":0.03980733486865879,"score_gpt":0.2657816395072278,"score_spread":0.225974304638569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964018439","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33514926,0.0004233287,0.604994,0.004326644,0.000038329912,0.0005564529,0.0021992717,0.00061575696,0.051696897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7261094,0.0002388211,0.27114293,0.0000567842,0.000006558658,0.00024295383,0.0004339344,0.000060775714,0.0017078344],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978452,0.0014261961,0.00007204831,0.0001987556,0.00034966893,0.00010803115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621105,0.0021195975,0.00034118124,0.00073727523,0.000375192,0.0002157962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041459976,0.0002993882,0.0003299611,0.0019707726,0.0015308514,0.003341047,0.00095223216,0.0005737585,0.003082033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009641972,0.00028944027,0.00037442334,0.0034117608,0.0012857389,0.0034677892,0.0031092328,0.0005497013,0.00030011236],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017536763,0.00026175642,0.064140245,0.00053013844,0.00018326056,0.00046141836,0.033198427,0.04042599,0.0084857745,0.15371676,0.014744382,0.6836764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009059915,0.0001666297,0.06514902,0.0005861675,0.00012435448,0.00046593303,0.060670454,0.20728524,0.0067087733,0.5518066,0.10679164,0.000154642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024811348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078744695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024811348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012862551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037808353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04933387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965642028","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.033","title":"Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Underpinning; Representativeness heuristic; Environmental resource management; Psychology; Ecosystem; Social psychology; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.024095063237588275,"score_gpt":0.2606986162016861,"score_spread":0.23660355296409782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965642028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47561026,0.003338268,0.29773855,0.027055018,0.00053277856,0.00055917253,0.0003101066,0.000094851224,0.19476092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809911,0.0005519888,0.016651299,0.00040540524,0.00015025966,0.00030920297,0.000043332475,0.000022549237,0.0008748823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9587432,0.0297429,0.0011926045,0.0015537001,0.007126455,0.0016410914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8095143,0.16144888,0.011341765,0.0074164793,0.008098944,0.0021796953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06622586,0.001224764,0.0010171308,0.006484662,0.0025477526,0.013671707,0.003280503,0.004002555,0.005569275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13931237,0.00065679173,0.001512772,0.0034428649,0.026807478,0.012836885,0.008165508,0.0047849473,0.00034090594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002362144,0.00012730119,0.006392077,0.00018652892,0.00013447697,0.000045226563,0.0027653647,0.004868539,0.0002262243,0.9631007,0.00031639077,0.021600971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058373138,0.00011810954,0.0048440197,0.00022606003,0.00009517659,0.000037579746,0.0036769758,0.015035283,0.0006013175,0.9730747,0.0021894353,0.00004305056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028936204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004956228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06622586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009092024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058587277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967994418","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.019","title":"Wood and non-wood pulp production: Comparative ecological footprinting on the Canadian prairies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pulp (tooth); Ecological footprint; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Agriculture; Taiga; Paper production; Wood production; Agronomy; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Forest management; Biology; Sustainability; Engineering","score_opus":0.01832144692833927,"score_gpt":0.21962903032001616,"score_spread":0.20130758339167687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967994418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975211,0.00029450143,0.00007698407,0.00009208595,0.0000010784537,0.000011292009,0.00033879728,0.0000026330267,0.001661599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965893,0.00042148225,0.00041030007,0.00002749597,0.0000012858418,0.0000091349775,0.00036757902,0.0000055930113,0.0021678342],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991013,0.00010799633,0.00001993109,0.00014038736,0.0003278583,0.00030259855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841917,0.0002453672,0.00018788213,0.000102440266,0.0007041543,0.00034092902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095161994,0.00035950556,0.0005967862,0.0020598695,0.004139842,0.0016915881,0.0016387509,0.0005370928,0.0024003822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001864823,0.00040394146,0.00052831793,0.007035038,0.0026721826,0.0009141589,0.0013541837,0.00061630656,0.00021065859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013048219,0.0003021199,0.8975244,0.00024743963,0.00038779018,0.000737969,0.0154281035,0.005296684,0.0076525724,0.005437145,0.0020841183,0.063596725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005524198,0.000026803065,0.9945755,0.000011758551,0.000022572338,0.00004432995,0.003208617,0.0006394288,0.00013221725,0.00013094209,0.0011846313,0.000017601616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99408466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99918026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028542234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028542234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014092511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20708936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975183154","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.021","title":"Globalization, trade and migration: Undermining sustainability","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Community College; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Natural resource; Globalization; Economics; Population; Resource depletion; Population growth; Natural resource economics; Business; Economic system; Ecology; Market economy","score_opus":0.010607653339337093,"score_gpt":0.22428210658744416,"score_spread":0.21367445324810708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975183154","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18981513,0.0896468,0.005953039,0.5193201,0.0015242301,0.000016754639,0.0001719685,0.000060116254,0.19349194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94036764,0.029138666,0.0008938949,0.018712278,0.0026361626,0.000015943835,0.00003624938,0.000027787457,0.008171449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989126,0.0005640511,0.00002741432,0.00012311157,0.00017445032,0.00019844461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929477,0.004059206,0.0009203912,0.00047199422,0.0007231688,0.00087757315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039128475,0.00035093457,0.00046940517,0.0012506787,0.0018086195,0.009475034,0.0005211249,0.0049772677,0.007392335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006535524,0.00017998938,0.00027941092,0.0019991992,0.0142490305,0.011230245,0.0039622984,0.0025063416,0.00045789737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000848587,0.000055376346,0.012266427,0.00022736758,0.000038667215,0.00020048248,0.0033759694,0.0007704513,0.0003137502,0.901688,0.018301796,0.06267689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024387471,0.000029543671,0.010663948,0.00046010254,0.000032073178,0.0002143147,0.009920483,0.00048310572,0.00018626859,0.8565697,0.12139635,0.00001979483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035606374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076818406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009475034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021041057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028754468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024729848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979344163","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.008","title":"Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: A case study in Hangzhou, China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Wetland; Ecosystem services; China; Total economic value; Contingent valuation; Value (mathematics); Valuation (finance); Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Resource (disambiguation); Willingness to pay; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1050702986970693,"score_gpt":0.2499022652335738,"score_spread":0.14483196653650451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979344163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983398,0.000032910633,0.00058687537,0.000074858865,0.000001632631,0.000020930605,0.00005706907,0.000006356259,0.00087951124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991209,0.000026464244,0.00049110973,0.0000036282108,0.0000012529306,0.0000038458143,0.000040774616,0.0000014202304,0.00031048],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937636,0.00025914208,0.0000279512,0.00005972626,0.0001379435,0.0001388717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988065,0.00059943466,0.00012881018,0.000083533174,0.00023352886,0.00014818483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012726749,0.00043049204,0.00035760624,0.0018298059,0.0013268301,0.0011652187,0.00085028127,0.00095521985,0.0008265388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021673834,0.00017219695,0.00048508667,0.0024755641,0.0010432836,0.00082850887,0.000750937,0.0003192091,0.000042234726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084917335,0.0009819373,0.71163106,0.00025046553,0.00036757268,0.022817085,0.0061840303,0.15863542,0.007559226,0.019064048,0.002513515,0.06914652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013812643,0.00052369165,0.57226413,0.00006826104,0.00026307482,0.0013232754,0.018729381,0.39270407,0.0037865418,0.006901433,0.003183137,0.00011485348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20541438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3044582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20541438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067426874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002771369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4084375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979527353","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.018","title":"A framework for evaluating collective action and informal institutional dynamics under a resource management policy of decentralization","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Property rights; Collective action; Institutionalisation; Economic system; Common-pool resource; Business; Economics; Political science; Market economy; Politics; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.046473200811931736,"score_gpt":0.2871947888119448,"score_spread":0.2407215880000131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979527353","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25459063,0.0007408232,0.4885505,0.008899376,0.00018288042,0.0017042827,0.0011715469,0.00020904778,0.2439509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91211134,0.00020470077,0.078155294,0.00024240871,0.000058406687,0.0015578064,0.00017039277,0.000026198948,0.0074734897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900462,0.007167343,0.00030263583,0.0005784034,0.0007690493,0.001136412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878269,0.008448045,0.0014116154,0.0008254514,0.00084531336,0.00064279814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011799569,0.000894827,0.0015831867,0.0033196423,0.0024624343,0.007328961,0.0021222106,0.0036284558,0.013456433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014499968,0.0004776808,0.0013878114,0.002853302,0.008983412,0.0073439837,0.0033937113,0.0022005863,0.00039473176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029227123,0.00014308609,0.0010808914,0.00004272815,0.000034276334,0.000038513856,0.00030772248,0.017115809,0.00012786059,0.9776693,0.00049941713,0.0029111833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013960719,0.00023956805,0.00252708,0.00007689912,0.000063434185,0.000030155974,0.0032169453,0.117820375,0.00032692024,0.86838657,0.007130635,0.000041779193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012149355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013108002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013456433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008300511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065102805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062402844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982174961","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.027","title":"Resource compensation and negotiation support in an aboriginal context: Using community-based multi-attribute analysis to evaluate non-market losses","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry","keywords":"Negotiation; Valuation (finance); Damages; Metis; Resource (disambiguation); Human settlement; Context (archaeology); Market value; Compensation (psychology); Economics; Environmental economics; Actuarial science; Public economics; Environmental resource management; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Geography; Political science; Social science; Accounting","score_opus":0.13224036988243354,"score_gpt":0.29920383605948175,"score_spread":0.16696346617704821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982174961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989247,0.00002294476,0.0005171729,0.000026253516,0.000001782403,0.000013316236,0.000014073148,0.0000023122789,0.000477478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940217,0.0000087042745,0.00047894887,0.000002975204,0.0000011880592,0.0000081553135,0.000018088418,0.000001332356,0.000078393554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981591,0.0012245512,0.00007249202,0.00012708193,0.00025487132,0.00016188914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98708147,0.008706701,0.001677963,0.0004540076,0.0011506878,0.0009292007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061032954,0.00050301926,0.0005528511,0.0020227106,0.0015137554,0.0026631015,0.0010851419,0.0010519094,0.0013764998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024263015,0.0002052318,0.0005813844,0.0015012773,0.0010310919,0.0022216253,0.0013761086,0.0010708123,0.00010327708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040996177,0.0022383688,0.9065594,0.00011704682,0.00070978777,0.00071096484,0.0102833165,0.027726946,0.0025240362,0.004785143,0.00035814033,0.03988726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010799753,0.0012284666,0.6391459,0.000053209245,0.0004328116,0.000254525,0.022485662,0.32747355,0.0016518738,0.006402711,0.00067160587,0.000091651076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051235333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027031822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013880163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09321225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983869360","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.006","title":"Illegal GMO releases and corporate responsibility: Questioning the effectiveness of voluntary measures","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Business; Corporate social responsibility; Liability; Damages; Precautionary principle; Agriculture; Externality; Consumption (sociology); Social responsibility; Natural resource economics; Public economics; Economics; Accounting; Biotechnology; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.034866270553437315,"score_gpt":0.23471934343670228,"score_spread":0.19985307288326498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983869360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40960848,0.009645956,0.014386838,0.2769521,0.0008716535,0.00022133613,0.00025107834,0.000048622165,0.28801394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889192,0.0013591914,0.00115503,0.0067330427,0.00038158652,0.000050237235,0.000022928776,0.000011172356,0.0013675843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9440201,0.032294996,0.0020500058,0.0040689786,0.013929156,0.0036368703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.40032527,0.51303005,0.04655157,0.015396074,0.020345652,0.004351277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07887278,0.000594856,0.0010857302,0.0033756,0.0037048054,0.009539086,0.0038431464,0.01353122,0.007282363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2738495,0.00045352342,0.0009214213,0.0020564466,0.036427747,0.01412841,0.0050115134,0.0063437107,0.0003855044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031376252,0.0005771559,0.04454871,0.00034068376,0.0002656286,0.00019077303,0.0022031153,0.001659074,0.00040801152,0.8933905,0.005928974,0.05017362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019754592,0.00038045523,0.052779667,0.000886614,0.00019463892,0.00030544295,0.007704564,0.004518959,0.0010299806,0.91654146,0.015365723,0.00009494588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008478863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009168774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07887278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084292665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4171241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984357333","doi":"10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00048-4","title":"Economics, ecology-based communities, and sustainability","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological economics; Sustainability; Livelihood; Industrialisation; Context (archaeology); Natural resource; Human development theory; Ecology; Natural (archaeology); Economics; Environmental resource management; Geography; Mainstream economics; Applied economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.014790221238223438,"score_gpt":0.19123377198452918,"score_spread":0.17644355074630574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984357333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14368355,0.041294508,0.018603778,0.14873162,0.0008154748,0.000094071744,0.00019276404,0.000050858413,0.6465334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706042,0.007956179,0.0016362885,0.003567591,0.00050910556,0.00007052626,0.0000436721,0.000012020804,0.015600381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986797,0.0007611775,0.000028721262,0.00010381158,0.00026491674,0.00016169438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609584,0.0025999085,0.00033568218,0.0001936649,0.00026939737,0.00050550315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028961748,0.0003883718,0.0004442696,0.0013627919,0.0024967089,0.0045120814,0.0006149565,0.0028481106,0.011756029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061393226,0.0001726206,0.00016893023,0.0025349462,0.012473213,0.005184263,0.0025819833,0.0017334265,0.00045718515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018469544,0.00006969143,0.0015774495,0.000048761754,0.000009830996,0.000040407725,0.00059507973,0.0007065264,0.000030829153,0.9801159,0.004669534,0.0121175675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001632218,0.000010912454,0.0018099075,0.000051613606,0.000004405155,0.000052018564,0.0010726161,0.00059385115,0.000019567293,0.97350186,0.022862673,0.0000043197783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008700381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012683435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011756029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003126144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024970747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03932786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985091715","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.011","title":"Assessment of net ecosystem services of plastic greenhouse vegetable cultivation in China","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse; Ecosystem services; Agriculture; Environmental science; China; Irrigation; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Agricultural science; Agricultural economics; Agronomy; Geography; Biology; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.01239642703596907,"score_gpt":0.2020528255620255,"score_spread":0.18965639852605642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985091715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994647,0.000036983114,0.00010754631,0.0000136007875,5.0789066e-7,0.0000034695122,0.00007144227,0.000002320465,0.0002995271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970764,0.000025146894,0.000046345423,0.0000020908922,6.403084e-7,0.0000020320429,0.00008205289,6.4000005e-7,0.00013341915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996356,0.000085681044,0.000019911135,0.00006819899,0.00009113832,0.00009941915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994802,0.0001061545,0.00010465474,0.000039512313,0.00014685842,0.00012263743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083988236,0.0006072385,0.00033123125,0.0023992986,0.0005633171,0.0007840011,0.0005319912,0.00027957105,0.0004977062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006567195,0.00021873286,0.0006808372,0.0017805065,0.0006070568,0.00081586686,0.0006426965,0.00012689823,0.00003790949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003813327,0.00011658552,0.93578124,0.000070615446,0.00029948735,0.00062947866,0.0004576289,0.038359046,0.0068870825,0.0016540217,0.00020447,0.015158989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013186466,0.00010443352,0.9615182,0.0000052493415,0.00007744826,0.00005622473,0.0006449026,0.036002904,0.00076352723,0.00045355875,0.00034259778,0.000017743332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12619162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17649846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12619162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006281164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002936924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25091422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985392933","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.025","title":"Remote tourism and forest management: a spatial hedonic analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Alberta; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Tourism; Forest management; Environmental resource management; Geography; Business; Forestry; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.015771199202001974,"score_gpt":0.19495715134658836,"score_spread":0.17918595214458638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985392933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98309255,0.00101522,0.00861357,0.0007042897,0.000020547119,0.00001899468,0.0002317062,0.000015993262,0.0062870826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973361,0.0002513546,0.00044637686,0.000020884452,0.000022071508,0.0000042460665,0.000074823634,0.000002835883,0.001841238],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998658,0.000056725847,0.000004971737,0.000018751924,0.000022860351,0.00003083922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934727,0.00039554393,0.00008626255,0.000038415732,0.000054022257,0.00007849428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005585816,0.00041497205,0.00043395426,0.00081175764,0.00029306757,0.0014847217,0.0006074744,0.0006168699,0.0077492204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014318329,0.00024301007,0.0008902403,0.001222518,0.00085632404,0.0019421043,0.0010307501,0.00053202134,0.0001643449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007521254,0.0006147289,0.31480837,0.00017417475,0.0008483534,0.0014761664,0.00074670656,0.45386037,0.003079918,0.16008893,0.0031793022,0.06037083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006072332,0.0003381014,0.26542082,0.000041243464,0.00040622638,0.00033244802,0.0019629525,0.663501,0.000303299,0.06547311,0.0020999853,0.00006005291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02393618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02839599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02393618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008544193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046895037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047593713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991088917","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.006","title":"Evaluating China's urban environmental sustainability with Data Envelopment Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; World Bank Group","keywords":"Sustainability; Environmental Sustainability Index; Data envelopment analysis; Per capita; Beijing; China; Sustainable development; Urbanization; Gross domestic product; Benchmarking; Index (typography); Natural resource economics; Geography; Business; Economic growth; Economics; Population; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.0911556531172484,"score_gpt":0.3859296661094064,"score_spread":0.294774012992158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991088917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95785415,0.00031939184,0.03695555,0.00020254229,0.000012642327,0.0000719691,0.00034195883,0.000062687905,0.0041791047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952413,0.00008767623,0.004157936,0.000008467887,0.0000024459669,0.00003169354,0.00015177293,0.000008334839,0.00031042154],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978339,0.00088928867,0.000111669506,0.00022645156,0.0006315573,0.00030720263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982273,0.0009541506,0.00014679524,0.00018222677,0.00038070887,0.000108790475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039129145,0.0010681266,0.001156896,0.0031031687,0.0009917383,0.002633071,0.0005955444,0.0006738867,0.0007509778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044645974,0.00033961993,0.0011808302,0.0040797302,0.0008347669,0.0017734895,0.0011635848,0.00038880596,0.00005785499],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012920404,0.00010012061,0.03229509,0.0001239128,0.00020053485,0.00012525394,0.00012120142,0.9254807,0.0015730694,0.008508187,0.00044672404,0.030896107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018939078,0.000077746176,0.015786862,0.000012603627,0.00009421059,0.000013111773,0.00020540743,0.9762639,0.0018848544,0.005053097,0.0005599484,0.000029325167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08418669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06842995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08418669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008399063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16739333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992836022","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.002","title":"Energy–environment policy modeling of endogenous technological change with personal vehicles: combining top-down and bottom-up methods","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Top-down and bottom-up design; Greenhouse gas; Economics; Technological change; Production (economics); Environmental economics; Energy (signal processing); Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Natural resource economics; Macroeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04371445970309846,"score_gpt":0.24701984303350988,"score_spread":0.20330538333041143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992836022","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077190585,0.0007139313,0.90190667,0.0009732317,0.00016010179,0.00010464663,0.00035978784,0.00023833151,0.018352784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9069462,0.0008379872,0.08197234,0.00021421732,0.00013910278,0.00023410922,0.00028466576,0.00015002863,0.009221341],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836606,0.00099616,0.000056397665,0.00018091642,0.0001942348,0.000206264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627376,0.0029325732,0.00018169663,0.00018647948,0.0002690313,0.00015645746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027864806,0.0014491465,0.0024941603,0.0014407083,0.0011633603,0.0030681666,0.0027403126,0.0021482082,0.005494502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059796497,0.0016142052,0.0023988513,0.0016834617,0.0016750346,0.002981835,0.002245863,0.0022479808,0.00040721038],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011478276,0.000031868745,0.0003146542,0.000019272054,0.00004174416,0.000025727079,0.000018626744,0.98268706,0.00007058977,0.014208047,0.00018429861,0.002386627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032703774,0.0000041441945,0.00005490263,0.0000021617852,0.000009469832,0.0000015761574,0.0000064654314,0.99181175,0.00003762525,0.007916563,0.0001488143,0.0000031220657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045300137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030295242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045300137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002702028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026877732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09007287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993499059","doi":"10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00041-1","title":"Northwest coast indigenous institutions that supported resilience and sustainability","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of British Columbia; Northern Arizona University","keywords":"Indigenous; Sustainability; Corporate governance; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Environmental ethics; Tragedy of the commons; Environmental resource management; Trespass; Sociology; Political science; Commons; Law; Ecology; Economics; Social science; Management","score_opus":0.06662407721612228,"score_gpt":0.3374401854482899,"score_spread":0.2708161082321676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993499059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61826086,0.00060770166,0.0020366535,0.04079261,0.00022635536,0.00014832521,0.000095723306,0.000030342442,0.33780146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98068935,0.00018863191,0.0005205868,0.0012679019,0.000043139113,0.0000318181,0.000009125885,0.0000070757037,0.017242353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697566,0.0011873972,0.00006594579,0.00015753103,0.00033954415,0.0012738687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98327786,0.0054332674,0.0018565645,0.0008475592,0.0022046652,0.006379982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061892145,0.00013742762,0.00017707155,0.0012610963,0.006465636,0.005385788,0.0007696772,0.0013579917,0.013242148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014799604,0.00019914722,0.00017604495,0.0010119895,0.009041347,0.0022269587,0.0064496854,0.0026886745,0.00028108165],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014055739,0.00040503932,0.11003013,0.0002562692,0.000072952345,0.0007924417,0.06769567,0.0006372944,0.001049586,0.72181565,0.015401179,0.081703275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012991535,0.0002229252,0.32491413,0.0015813345,0.00013459646,0.0004601873,0.20329781,0.0012588183,0.0014716516,0.11239489,0.35405052,0.00008321086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056935623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25522915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9430644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010554054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032107063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11320841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995425070","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.013","title":"Do children matter? An examination of gender differences in environmental valuation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Recreation; Valuation (finance); Economics; Psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.09539834136989948,"score_gpt":0.20864102285562264,"score_spread":0.11324268148572315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995425070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880712,0.0016854911,0.00018185473,0.0016051672,0.000037797083,0.0000058081787,0.00022846572,0.0000019686056,0.008182184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982768,0.00037678625,0.00005697765,0.00017884097,0.000013974683,0.000003420994,0.0000694487,0.0000037818518,0.001019994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999025,0.00044750006,0.000041370437,0.0001107635,0.00017104988,0.00020440757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850894,0.009951882,0.0030751952,0.00046666598,0.000582141,0.00083465374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027152577,0.00016948217,0.0003837616,0.00052079966,0.00047450338,0.0011795976,0.00036043092,0.00072989136,0.011078124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018057182,0.00018067373,0.0003669637,0.00095589354,0.0010477992,0.0013722283,0.00067176356,0.00079310196,0.0006141918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010277458,0.00038514394,0.94289726,0.000076679215,0.00018800184,0.00055327103,0.013830661,0.00018951268,0.0008402379,0.0095946705,0.0020363538,0.028380536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043837765,0.00029578037,0.97534126,0.00010202554,0.00009157144,0.00034260866,0.01401988,0.00023633336,0.0003053671,0.0036502606,0.0055540595,0.000016972794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007963577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013484295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011078124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041030685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005216403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037060022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000241983","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.008","title":"What value São Pedro's procession? Ecosystem services from local people's perceptions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Canada Research Chairs; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Provisioning; Valuation (finance); Perception; Ecosystem valuation; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Value (mathematics); Geography; Business; Ecosystem health; Psychology; Ecology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.005027416186474506,"score_gpt":0.19456926166494687,"score_spread":0.18954184547847236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000241983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8810288,0.001101131,0.000565053,0.023319602,0.00012482786,0.000018997333,0.00013907345,0.000007466828,0.09369508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986475,0.00019648926,0.00006585998,0.00019015011,0.000010393993,0.0000018506595,0.0000097414,0.0000019442316,0.0008760374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992415,0.0003477243,0.000022261878,0.000042666627,0.00017977375,0.000166138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962126,0.0014016975,0.00056964887,0.00009427543,0.00075674994,0.0009650453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016901329,0.00015622796,0.00016979517,0.000778557,0.0014572872,0.0036770832,0.0003180447,0.0007960416,0.00398787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007717292,0.00009368129,0.0002010498,0.0010335605,0.0021482182,0.0018427855,0.0011972266,0.0010036554,0.00018820667],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029799,0.00019662663,0.5858457,0.000594461,0.0001674604,0.0014272141,0.20360054,0.00066440133,0.0015107485,0.075241394,0.016566606,0.113886826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016308039,0.00010655394,0.34049988,0.00066563796,0.00009800082,0.00055002194,0.57860935,0.0008582152,0.00033659575,0.010779809,0.0674321,0.000047571677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030881703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10039532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030881703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017771239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012905778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06140393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008114983","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.004","title":"The why of the “Hau”: scarcity, gifts, and environmentalism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Environmentalism; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Generalization; Ecological economics; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Neoclassical economics; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Political science; Sustainability; Microeconomics; Law; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.007463262999884049,"score_gpt":0.15260686103876964,"score_spread":0.1451435980388856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008114983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20484973,0.018962184,0.01105332,0.50429106,0.0013624657,0.000020666117,0.00013397516,0.00007368897,0.25925294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98512566,0.0018051766,0.00075894664,0.007048584,0.0005438089,0.000012477196,0.000011367475,0.000024209228,0.0046697236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989141,0.00068206695,0.000020291998,0.00010623035,0.00014426095,0.00013313499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521625,0.00309209,0.00044558186,0.00042387555,0.00032497343,0.0004972565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031375133,0.00019843133,0.00046351991,0.0006953597,0.002755841,0.004445787,0.00045210894,0.0031786058,0.0069223866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008981578,0.00018165246,0.00021959379,0.0007661435,0.025330286,0.008805572,0.0019117338,0.0028727017,0.00050609244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074055235,0.00004230032,0.003381446,0.00005082994,0.0000151348895,0.000077909404,0.0022528928,0.00023670412,0.00019450112,0.9649013,0.0127445515,0.016028289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018649082,0.000010915241,0.0021716368,0.000046653597,0.000006822712,0.00010206568,0.0021680964,0.00027586814,0.00007967074,0.9701624,0.024945874,0.000011336823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022535236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002320464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069223866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017071685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082020793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023157716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008379776","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.015","title":"Global potential for carbon sequestration: Geographical distribution, country risk and policy implications","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reforestation; Afforestation; Carbon sequestration; Natural resource economics; Carbon offset; Developing country; Tree planting; Global warming; Climate change; Economics; Geography; Business; Forestry; Economic growth; Ecology","score_opus":0.004836107211118263,"score_gpt":0.21773678529569512,"score_spread":0.21290067808457686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008379776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8713932,0.021201504,0.0163723,0.028961573,0.00012564368,0.000020122361,0.0024473316,0.00010324735,0.059375025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939312,0.0038173574,0.0009990394,0.00018226926,0.000049558086,0.000006026205,0.00021804708,0.000012572585,0.00078396586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972683,0.00012861485,0.000007551361,0.00004431558,0.000047796533,0.00004490116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977043,0.0012061559,0.00039372942,0.00014604129,0.00041903244,0.0001308469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013936887,0.00029550318,0.0004114492,0.00155633,0.00046521818,0.0022746215,0.0003160118,0.0009549719,0.00430932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046749436,0.000151747,0.00037273523,0.004513971,0.0016513837,0.0031031482,0.0011937262,0.0007592302,0.00024582984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00113705,0.000116447074,0.34019735,0.0005626458,0.00069503585,0.0011423231,0.0012793887,0.104257256,0.0027106868,0.34629062,0.009637786,0.19197339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059418635,0.00016173205,0.3102561,0.00029120353,0.0004072914,0.0019263308,0.004471027,0.031729978,0.0014426314,0.61644125,0.03272968,0.00008336377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005704917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010777895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005704917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010164793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005285502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014416158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010479715","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.002","title":"Government investment in natural capital","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"World Bank Group; Conservation, Food and Health Foundation","keywords":"Investment (military); Capital (architecture); Fixed investment; Economics; Capital formation; Capital expenditure; Government (linguistics); Physical capital; Fixed capital; Capital investment; Financial capital; Monetary economics; Business; Public economics; Finance; Market economy; Human capital; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.008904135767877864,"score_gpt":0.1773103147829156,"score_spread":0.16840617901503774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010479715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12639242,0.004483479,0.0042222873,0.102286436,0.00078258646,0.000046737612,0.0006117594,0.000116516734,0.76105773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9033944,0.0029548605,0.00057096325,0.0031272052,0.0003373435,0.000028479853,0.00013575761,0.000018455577,0.08943254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988992,0.00024245173,0.000025009633,0.000100791694,0.0003179169,0.00041453706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966947,0.0015456625,0.0003526973,0.00028291173,0.0006136894,0.000510372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014255974,0.00025876198,0.00035574066,0.0009025735,0.0010493477,0.0035859155,0.00032744597,0.002943707,0.013490114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069496995,0.00022043288,0.00022344833,0.0014696766,0.001551762,0.0021500231,0.00096342433,0.001941353,0.00091877725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010115834,0.0001123051,0.006722154,0.00007896535,0.000040682902,0.00017817023,0.00028951536,0.0033387635,0.00026810824,0.91772115,0.03224271,0.03890629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078895806,0.00006413291,0.015690263,0.00026734243,0.00007943933,0.00016541632,0.00093192153,0.006116169,0.001056693,0.69806695,0.2774603,0.000022367096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01268902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028870132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013490114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051430645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054518417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04512894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013324405","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.03.004","title":"Behavioral innovations: The missing capital in sustainable development?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministère des Transports","keywords":"Natural capital; Sustainable development; Economics; Dual (grammatical number); Capital (architecture); Environmental quality; Technological change; Human capital; Environmental economics; Behavioral economics; Public economics; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Macroeconomics; Ecosystem services","score_opus":0.08821489164115037,"score_gpt":0.2217644845998781,"score_spread":0.13354959295872773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013324405","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23803683,0.031649783,0.25964147,0.3614829,0.003311811,0.00008453924,0.0014450442,0.00038916987,0.10395853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763906,0.007056025,0.0051189917,0.0038160281,0.0015573975,0.000040444193,0.00011785313,0.0000421027,0.0058606393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998226,0.0008325982,0.00007769787,0.0002820265,0.00031894245,0.0002627623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718589,0.019477153,0.003197726,0.0024648623,0.0013820269,0.0016193368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046547498,0.0006674731,0.0013069897,0.000963961,0.0009818405,0.005119387,0.0017906083,0.004147569,0.012836583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034182213,0.0004557836,0.0005152959,0.0013139579,0.009592272,0.017779574,0.0023389093,0.005412285,0.0006842163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006832911,0.000103648934,0.003977304,0.00014267668,0.0000584066,0.00014185124,0.0003340386,0.0042047095,0.0001534736,0.9459475,0.006038206,0.038829863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006750596,0.00001133617,0.0007946519,0.0000621426,0.000013720301,0.00003389139,0.00015815669,0.0032050412,0.000056286604,0.9920385,0.0036093132,0.000010171025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033732892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003653757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012836583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023416234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022244842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042942643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015325442","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.11.018","title":"Twentieth century copper stocks and flows in North America: A dynamic analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Yale University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Copper; Tailings; Material flow analysis; Environmental science; Tailings dam; Lithosphere; Copper mining; Geology; Waste management; Metallurgy; Materials science; Engineering","score_opus":0.004632455790527608,"score_gpt":0.207617823716781,"score_spread":0.2029853679262534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015325442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952638,0.00043409268,0.00034526538,0.0010073865,0.000008538345,0.0000040218865,0.00071414333,0.000008643499,0.0022141968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99392855,0.00088941294,0.00024429624,0.000059406797,0.000014120313,0.000009085133,0.00063093513,0.000006425817,0.0042177085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999223,0.000010172249,0.000003711262,0.000021647405,0.0000139708445,0.000028292701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996364,0.0000947993,0.000109196604,0.000015737938,0.0000906648,0.00005322178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029496587,0.00017172769,0.0002138321,0.0011376012,0.0006635019,0.0012311966,0.00048092598,0.0006617085,0.00313317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012218318,0.00030853684,0.00040881618,0.0024221486,0.000583226,0.00148552,0.00061592023,0.0005559219,0.00015197664],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002910033,0.00023065855,0.7820777,0.00011584455,0.0003623633,0.001193826,0.0025694682,0.1141408,0.0011692964,0.04371647,0.013738469,0.040394105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033461794,0.0000681936,0.8924389,0.000059463408,0.00021207155,0.0003487075,0.0046414477,0.071343035,0.000520436,0.012801492,0.017492509,0.000040337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34003583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4524281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6599642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033695751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001231949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6761132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016283768","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.022","title":"Managing without growth","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Obstacle; Poverty; Unemployment; Developing country; Welfare; Greenhouse gas; Green growth; Natural resource economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Sustainable development; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.05947683107935072,"score_gpt":0.22329272998566763,"score_spread":0.1638158989063169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016283768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010174952,0.0068701045,0.012093638,0.27864075,0.0054628584,0.000028770251,0.00019008895,0.00025328845,0.6862856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4100796,0.014034488,0.009045205,0.06603328,0.0055424217,0.0001350548,0.00040137034,0.00033094853,0.4943977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990414,0.00028552464,0.00002655859,0.00017415149,0.00030228132,0.00017013721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806684,0.0003811086,0.00019831063,0.00038011023,0.0004815914,0.0004919965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001625566,0.00063110475,0.00034259591,0.00062419596,0.0018993826,0.0061043333,0.0006666658,0.0030312238,0.024166176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005703503,0.00014029512,0.00023108457,0.00080268225,0.0031877065,0.008561427,0.003096401,0.0040929103,0.0059802933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001607166,0.000037573744,0.00055791053,0.000039320206,0.000008813888,0.00008280644,0.0003896638,0.00060379656,0.00031880106,0.7986326,0.1405464,0.058766175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044847257,0.000011145573,0.00033595532,0.00009346057,0.000004853081,0.000070899674,0.0005174022,0.0006135119,0.00023216469,0.40396902,0.59413964,0.000007431239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021652975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037056874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024166176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022079456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038970099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080843866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018327237","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.011","title":"Designing a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program to reduce deforestation in Tanzania: An assessment of payment approaches","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; Agricultural and Applied Economics Association","keywords":"Payment; Ecosystem services; Cash; Incentive; Business; Payment for ecosystem services; Tanzania; Natural resource economics; Conditionality; Additionality; Deforestation (computer science); Disbursement; Environmental resource management; Agricultural economics; Public economics; Ecosystem; Economics; Finance; Socioeconomics; Ecology","score_opus":0.13296546349643215,"score_gpt":0.2828587788122012,"score_spread":0.14989331531576902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018327237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639091,0.0004512336,0.021651817,0.003115595,0.000056089455,0.0021552765,0.00027391364,0.00006984681,0.008317034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98067355,0.0002456724,0.017283728,0.00018115884,0.000013001012,0.00045448917,0.000054070293,0.00000591451,0.0010884795],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961169,0.0028398258,0.00011453561,0.00014638853,0.00026387227,0.00051843445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965827,0.0021215382,0.0004753019,0.000081612045,0.0003159669,0.0004227945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052602333,0.000597279,0.0004596414,0.0009626004,0.0010988023,0.0015629497,0.0012522312,0.0013907301,0.0042651407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009476398,0.00037343215,0.0005678147,0.00086345157,0.0007447437,0.0014198208,0.0014630061,0.0010920719,0.00019456791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005331471,0.0058121136,0.09606892,0.0023093354,0.00043952875,0.0011504386,0.003741728,0.22251332,0.014631223,0.093749285,0.006533498,0.5477192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035367205,0.01756554,0.24808836,0.0013302438,0.0016521045,0.00060791185,0.013281669,0.615682,0.0120371,0.067748785,0.01820158,0.0002679805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011795382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024379743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011795382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062794583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009680127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045560837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019761781","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.014","title":"What will be the environmental effects of new free-floating car-sharing systems? The case of car2go in Ulm","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Transportation and Mobility Innovations","field":"Engineering","cited_by":489,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Point (geometry); Car ownership; Free riding; Environmental economics; Computer science; Transport engineering; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Public transport; Geography","score_opus":0.01999948077635889,"score_gpt":0.1930638476627719,"score_spread":0.17306436688641302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019761781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83246404,0.00084298104,0.0040520807,0.02234117,0.000086598055,0.000033275777,0.0002092754,0.000024734378,0.13994578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945359,0.0002439262,0.0003107173,0.00027285135,0.000026912441,0.000006464236,0.00001207372,0.0000059908602,0.004585056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990513,0.0002831202,0.000011873617,0.00008273866,0.00007959722,0.0004914112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849284,0.00085951295,0.00017413804,0.00007138138,0.00018542945,0.00021669577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014623773,0.000333213,0.0007041586,0.00056610006,0.0022134832,0.0049389694,0.0010754946,0.0042659976,0.0151750175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038255174,0.0002957106,0.0007883613,0.000785609,0.0032092365,0.0057788575,0.0019903774,0.0021850169,0.00040800305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045421522,0.00034432666,0.01729241,0.00021271106,0.00012332886,0.003106579,0.0013673002,0.08520593,0.0023195087,0.8666157,0.0069475085,0.016010424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024280461,0.00030888803,0.03368534,0.00016520724,0.0002417328,0.0007004447,0.025250012,0.12348353,0.0030586948,0.76565707,0.046989534,0.0002167162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039278332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04748316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039278332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048183217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001341344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07809943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021204141","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.013","title":"The Montreal Protocol's multilateral fund and sustainable development","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montreal Protocol; Sustainable development; Business; Investment (military); Kyoto Protocol; Productivity; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental economics; Climate change; Economics; Environmental science; Ozone layer; Economic growth; Political science; Ozone","score_opus":0.009002913476990372,"score_gpt":0.20366045820461856,"score_spread":0.1946575447276282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021204141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009203071,0.008788576,0.0034074984,0.09652822,0.005011409,0.0010137893,0.01179591,0.00048000773,0.86377144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09724066,0.003869749,0.008203955,0.02441421,0.0010643485,0.0013301995,0.0032537426,0.0003145773,0.8603085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919003,0.001169157,0.00035232847,0.00051497814,0.0041956,0.0018675657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566406,0.0007577136,0.00030769326,0.00048869255,0.0020567349,0.0007251734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055193417,0.0011334615,0.00066908007,0.0025080803,0.0055225096,0.009477182,0.0029456376,0.008196368,0.03351992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017639935,0.0007840639,0.0009151598,0.0035320441,0.0019411506,0.002988086,0.004377074,0.0066820434,0.0027401848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007763508,0.00006647951,0.0013409585,0.00015205459,0.00004225654,0.00013220863,0.0003191021,0.0004883319,0.00029339993,0.4358844,0.53551537,0.025687825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050750863,0.000025369298,0.008502016,0.00017898803,0.00002876155,0.00006539831,0.00017254858,0.00028992398,0.00030602163,0.010876454,0.9794464,0.000057271878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8133581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85074097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8133581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02839002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08512872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37548202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025951156","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.002","title":"An institutional framework for designing and monitoring ecosystem-based fisheries management policy experiments","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Business; Fisheries management; Livelihood; Environmental resource management; Process (computing); Sustainable management; Environmental economics; Economics; Fishing; Fishery; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.040840626707853434,"score_gpt":0.29163887274679456,"score_spread":0.25079824603894113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025951156","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053564016,0.00035237992,0.86791515,0.015788876,0.00026112262,0.0050386256,0.0014088652,0.0007496926,0.054921247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5537261,0.00022792793,0.43026632,0.0015466732,0.00013216527,0.010618799,0.0003573852,0.00006823851,0.003056404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94370127,0.039813504,0.0037303874,0.004611547,0.005568479,0.0025747663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85259914,0.08786086,0.019912034,0.023664037,0.010500097,0.0054638325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09242906,0.0013608459,0.001687949,0.003445534,0.0043336824,0.014197712,0.0050711567,0.006424863,0.006712277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107700594,0.0015495555,0.0012200315,0.0030226186,0.010623538,0.014086058,0.004939996,0.005224971,0.00062448427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016596868,0.000492812,0.0051809354,0.00012838624,0.000149433,0.00013113712,0.0005932204,0.027215721,0.0012201469,0.9445382,0.0024831982,0.017700799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041701554,0.00038085878,0.0030544796,0.00016806327,0.00017525419,0.000061080435,0.0009821882,0.0561088,0.002109111,0.9168073,0.019611629,0.00012420463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004482982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077058603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09242906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008814449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0166036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4888174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030584440","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.014","title":"Understanding the heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas","keywords":"Mixed logit; Preference; Population; Constraint (computer-aided design); Quarter (Canadian coin); Fire protection; Economics; Geography; Public economics; Econometrics; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Microeconomics; Logistic regression; Engineering; Statistics; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.32320742510127143,"score_gpt":0.2597427725744224,"score_spread":0.06346465252684902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030584440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98382527,0.00023401,0.0081391055,0.0016378424,0.000010274546,0.0000091988695,0.000112710826,0.0000063046364,0.006025142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933845,0.000044159377,0.00032876906,0.00004648897,0.000012934365,0.0000022739548,0.000027566455,0.0000016069077,0.00019775485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990508,0.0005294219,0.000033094202,0.00012278388,0.000102096,0.00016186557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798248,0.016277522,0.0019911586,0.0009620068,0.0003657894,0.00057872344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028910914,0.00023278603,0.00052376674,0.0009132482,0.00039331283,0.002299794,0.0005414286,0.0012267272,0.0057800026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017829254,0.00026290072,0.00040513516,0.0007571912,0.0012296237,0.0025823333,0.0007972392,0.0013091417,0.00015368457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010900818,0.0009296452,0.5566888,0.0001764297,0.001464464,0.0008935759,0.002523471,0.083189875,0.004763123,0.2690412,0.0028193,0.07642006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008981556,0.00015608862,0.300299,0.00004096142,0.00018522199,0.00035116056,0.004061818,0.117302194,0.00056733086,0.57501155,0.0018814311,0.000053400374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004020954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062190522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057800026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009719469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031596905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019336045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030774491","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.010","title":"Improved cooking stoves and firewood consumption: Quasi-experimental evidence from the Northern Peruvian Andes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad de Chile; International Development Research Centre; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Stove; Firewood; Consumption (sociology); Frame (networking); Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Agricultural economics; Economics; Computer science; Engineering; Waste management; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.023255509660486933,"score_gpt":0.21529439783048107,"score_spread":0.19203888816999415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030774491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993255,0.00008554476,0.000071514245,0.00004033848,0.0000012485813,0.00002087178,0.00004443259,0.0000012772302,0.00040934174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832624,0.00020895748,0.00026484294,0.00008385361,0.0000049433283,0.00011657753,0.00016751532,0.0000030618364,0.0008239078],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983754,0.0010611461,0.000038169954,0.00028170794,0.00007360911,0.00016996414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938676,0.0036722352,0.0012333054,0.0007182544,0.00029850774,0.00020996755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029408506,0.00071675197,0.00064806436,0.0005274,0.0017694521,0.0010540717,0.0007683694,0.0010810575,0.006604447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006293587,0.0006017097,0.00049428205,0.0008975767,0.0028167218,0.0009247027,0.0011501401,0.0008562698,0.00047309426],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021055745,0.04562774,0.79642975,0.0013175153,0.00266806,0.0016679765,0.06381735,0.0009037158,0.019866386,0.0031018634,0.0012420329,0.042301904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008567125,0.007391253,0.9697916,0.000079049394,0.00066213135,0.00019222207,0.016315699,0.00041460697,0.0010426886,0.0007404827,0.0024717443,0.00004189271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024932167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042144205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024932167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076343236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055012875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049574137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033227688","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.003","title":"Motor vehicle insurance rating with pseudo emissions coverage","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Automobile insurance; Business; Rating system; Actuarial science; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental economics","score_opus":0.010259517806127388,"score_gpt":0.20515518417550654,"score_spread":0.19489566636937916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033227688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9182004,0.0004658169,0.014892543,0.0011361709,0.00021279114,0.00023005926,0.015036562,0.0005146652,0.04931104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99266595,0.000051287287,0.0016334467,0.00008448911,0.000048206326,0.000034975154,0.0029100415,0.000018615245,0.0025531272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924826,0.0034595497,0.00055993255,0.0006647858,0.0021834394,0.0006496236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95877004,0.02956598,0.0037040059,0.0034842072,0.0033990517,0.0010766871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071283914,0.00042478862,0.00068759324,0.0015730462,0.00024756926,0.001464126,0.0010165147,0.0011536716,0.01762226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04824812,0.00020610428,0.0009255811,0.0011829868,0.000507341,0.0013878247,0.00059711223,0.0011312583,0.0018862323],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007913743,0.0011838124,0.7224985,0.00041786494,0.0008023695,0.00072399783,0.00018380344,0.085717715,0.003060152,0.026274566,0.03646037,0.11476316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042352188,0.0019058876,0.6684591,0.000088827685,0.00047659845,0.0012444213,0.00034297814,0.2949703,0.004912408,0.015544002,0.011514035,0.00011788828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026107011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024995664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01762226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005828436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048242693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05895233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033560226","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.020","title":"The transition to an oil contraction economy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Non-renewable resource; Minimax; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Resource (disambiguation); Shock (circulatory); Resource depletion; Normative; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Renewable energy","score_opus":0.014898021520965074,"score_gpt":0.26667623988867745,"score_spread":0.25177821836771236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033560226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6713848,0.0013117531,0.0029499782,0.09232629,0.00038137252,0.000037767226,0.00019921499,0.000043876393,0.23136495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98696345,0.0005510848,0.00025060386,0.0015029155,0.000066109584,0.000012175235,0.000029242321,0.0000110408155,0.01061338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967265,0.00008406526,0.000008094178,0.000024606554,0.00004058169,0.00016993069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955255,0.000121831785,0.0000449953,0.000031629417,0.000069347254,0.0001795771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068054075,0.000095950956,0.00014970415,0.00041104227,0.0019110381,0.0029880477,0.0003220147,0.0012833836,0.0063180937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002322517,0.000077174656,0.00022131234,0.0004402454,0.0041432385,0.0031899665,0.0018878496,0.0019699193,0.00030137826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116340874,0.000052851734,0.002310265,0.000031463016,0.0000049583437,0.0003821935,0.002475504,0.001030005,0.00037548275,0.9719107,0.0075456393,0.013764505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006279887,0.00006159551,0.01255799,0.00010691559,0.0000102011345,0.0002706981,0.0157012,0.0026691074,0.00055232155,0.7736721,0.19431603,0.000019052412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0122926785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010736313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122926785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030933528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003766575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024442255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033785671","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.017","title":"Participation in the world's first clean development mechanism forest project: The role of property rights, social capital and contractual rules","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Clean Development Mechanism; Additionality; Property rights; Incentive; Business; Social capital; Capital (architecture); Pooling; Natural resource economics; Economics; Public economics; Environmental resource management; Economic growth; Environmental economics; Climate change; Market economy; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.012983434646706695,"score_gpt":0.19841289502950063,"score_spread":0.18542946038279393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033785671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6953151,0.0004803064,0.0037248458,0.033677306,0.00022101785,0.00022033662,0.00026987426,0.000021454485,0.26606968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986798,0.00007131946,0.00029148845,0.00059941056,0.000039388822,0.00006321941,0.000047476253,0.0000046869445,0.012085024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931096,0.0034320585,0.000117987984,0.00025379896,0.00078482,0.0023016701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894671,0.0050446163,0.0009512857,0.000649101,0.00060626067,0.0032815707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010905023,0.00018724796,0.00026109422,0.0004917038,0.004136128,0.0050870017,0.0010705048,0.0036023909,0.008443391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013912253,0.0001442285,0.00021119516,0.0006722308,0.0033948375,0.0029963339,0.0038661961,0.0027027233,0.000314375],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062069314,0.0011196892,0.06508492,0.0001045709,0.00005241213,0.00052668503,0.012356013,0.0036256507,0.00070354145,0.8187235,0.025066253,0.072016194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046684025,0.00037593592,0.15535605,0.0004221381,0.00009678982,0.00025646677,0.030020416,0.014580702,0.0023521993,0.53595454,0.25997785,0.00014016003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025938408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050144047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025938408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024114605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012157731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057671964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036959197","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.001","title":"Industrial output restriction and the Kyoto protocol: An input–output approach with application to Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Greenhouse gas; Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Gross domestic product; Natural resource economics; Final demand; Environmental economics; Environmental science; Economy; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Ecology","score_opus":0.02009559283111716,"score_gpt":0.20835897948760934,"score_spread":0.18826338665649217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036959197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21843551,0.013695288,0.14973736,0.028791906,0.001222764,0.0021095097,0.011499262,0.0012481897,0.5732602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9118397,0.005346016,0.032905243,0.0016456057,0.00024782232,0.0006400806,0.0014533163,0.00018013679,0.04574209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940686,0.0016281869,0.00022408024,0.0005949464,0.0021398584,0.0013442648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939501,0.0032462764,0.00032092963,0.0003068626,0.0019092722,0.00026644164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00596138,0.0017981756,0.002321493,0.0028685713,0.0052435603,0.008187581,0.003245112,0.0038848142,0.007980238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013763548,0.00078742695,0.0021944875,0.006597921,0.0047231163,0.0037476507,0.0026929753,0.004590653,0.00032664405],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027986715,0.0001599338,0.0043198504,0.00039944443,0.00019688842,0.0005575194,0.00043201586,0.08282706,0.00025541507,0.86596847,0.022456106,0.02214741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057974947,0.00017085102,0.010406343,0.0003153798,0.0008277973,0.00013071323,0.0016130491,0.16348077,0.0012826017,0.7578882,0.062966496,0.00033806317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9488725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92871857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051127493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04883583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0872699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35433042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038335062","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.025","title":"A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":567,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptive management; Natural resource management; Livelihood; Complex adaptive system; Resilience (materials science); Ecosystem management; Process (computing); Enthusiasm; Perspective (graphical); Psychological resilience; Environmental resource management; Adaptive capacity; Resource management (computing); Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource; Socio-ecological system; Management science; Business; Ecology; Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Ecosystem; Climate change; Social psychology; Agriculture; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04388033897502572,"score_gpt":0.2593410575695124,"score_spread":0.2154607185944867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038335062","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21764795,0.0012086469,0.75342673,0.0047076326,0.00012450712,0.00029210566,0.0005627258,0.00021068937,0.021819005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94781613,0.00027021242,0.050846558,0.00009369058,0.0000450211,0.00016551136,0.00009137616,0.0000146068205,0.0006569704],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964226,0.0021070065,0.00019229087,0.0002932712,0.0005979988,0.00038680393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99069136,0.005377521,0.0017345585,0.00060225313,0.00080548576,0.00078886363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00810617,0.0014912211,0.00088426546,0.0059184316,0.0010076329,0.0028230476,0.0018422708,0.0020407175,0.0030404632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022662314,0.00034455038,0.0009942913,0.0033088245,0.0035517714,0.005737793,0.0040739607,0.0011726349,0.00016180912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010167522,0.0001820326,0.024590591,0.0001553298,0.000591671,0.00030104895,0.00039864652,0.47929698,0.0012088777,0.45335293,0.0014892853,0.03833099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022710412,0.00021093596,0.009779987,0.00008999015,0.00014140923,0.00025077086,0.0007058294,0.55465347,0.000504754,0.4315497,0.0020234853,0.0000670129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004828759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046448014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00810617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027610234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022921895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042870045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048009832","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.020","title":"Anomalies in green national accounting","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; Universitetet i Oslo","keywords":"National accounts; Accounting; Geography; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.024977638629000615,"score_gpt":0.20110380022578134,"score_spread":0.1761261615967807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048009832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9108076,0.001082767,0.011376574,0.012030871,0.00045708672,0.000012457437,0.0025154713,0.00042047966,0.061296646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962591,0.0001802322,0.0006076219,0.0001349223,0.00005575283,0.0000027646688,0.0003640018,0.000040878425,0.002354876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979504,0.0004643624,0.0001391762,0.00029639207,0.0008356077,0.0003140856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838049,0.007294569,0.0030795808,0.0017935716,0.0035179947,0.0005094033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034443128,0.00014005038,0.00038323025,0.002458987,0.0008595351,0.0036467318,0.00060522195,0.0010047772,0.0041488456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04940075,0.00023241388,0.0002525455,0.005362655,0.0012470442,0.004832489,0.0012137636,0.0022232388,0.00036330632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015386299,0.000045351786,0.13051142,0.000029598345,0.00006219532,0.0001500789,0.00077884045,0.023554612,0.00030421148,0.7798127,0.023696978,0.04090021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010910988,0.000021479036,0.17048654,0.000058232705,0.000060874012,0.00018855058,0.0018862614,0.10688858,0.0011032815,0.67544955,0.043759767,0.000086007145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04212607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049333822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04212607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049837236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023867993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08376169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049345493","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.008","title":"Compensation for environmental services from artisanal fisheries in SE Brazil: Policy and technical strategies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Norsk institutt for naturforskning; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Artisanal fishing; Fishing; Livelihood; Business; Fishery; Environmental resource management; Payment; Government (linguistics); Environmental planning; Geography; Natural resource economics; Agriculture; Economics","score_opus":0.02326269068410361,"score_gpt":0.20580837604062446,"score_spread":0.18254568535652085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049345493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.832871,0.0077851852,0.0025161763,0.07056551,0.00015963822,0.0002881442,0.00070110784,0.00008315581,0.08503007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99283034,0.0008928431,0.000786317,0.0015293614,0.000045036057,0.000042063377,0.00005440063,0.000007021897,0.0038126442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776995,0.00079928,0.000118962955,0.00014615942,0.00040613554,0.00075948855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939466,0.0025816527,0.0010771961,0.00032086574,0.0010448181,0.0010288474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045461114,0.0003750885,0.00030496548,0.0014722596,0.001459779,0.0021927604,0.0009832736,0.0025044112,0.0037952291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013033169,0.00024390165,0.0005127667,0.0008819826,0.0015625026,0.0018141933,0.0020107029,0.0012787094,0.00022670894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063036964,0.00051136717,0.44143236,0.0010611078,0.00024133504,0.0020000387,0.0074256505,0.005425512,0.009158089,0.29988262,0.01722319,0.21500838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027029173,0.00048747147,0.8141065,0.002033902,0.00039365905,0.0019331467,0.011151572,0.018847695,0.0039268136,0.04270427,0.10400506,0.00013952599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10755366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22034825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10755366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054086284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011056857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21385527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051200322","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.013","title":"Reassessing the costs of biological invasion: Mnemiopsis leidyi in the Black sea","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Anchovy; Fishery; Population; Ecology; Engraulis; Ecosystem; Bioeconomics; Biology; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.04909316167537908,"score_gpt":0.26209052525321724,"score_spread":0.21299736357783816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051200322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987231,0.00015629978,0.000060924147,0.00022706551,0.000003535017,0.0000015248876,0.000022282948,9.840824e-7,0.0008042386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993819,0.00010593351,0.00012325661,0.00005693404,0.0000061895184,0.0000029033906,0.00002625664,0.0000016208807,0.00029502573],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998111,0.00006487993,0.000013534067,0.000027657878,0.000042535303,0.000040233994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984616,0.00060383766,0.0004914908,0.00007002325,0.00018461833,0.00018843061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095656683,0.00030137884,0.00021046064,0.000579184,0.0005617204,0.00088371336,0.00057472044,0.00085240055,0.0019545765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024707585,0.0001797157,0.00024744394,0.00035579866,0.00092721224,0.0011299757,0.0007661427,0.0007441424,0.000120706136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003733388,0.0004155375,0.8035737,0.00042703954,0.00032732455,0.0013810507,0.0014170017,0.028463837,0.07788991,0.010098468,0.0014503284,0.07082242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050959294,0.00041607374,0.9726723,0.000038683655,0.00011209981,0.0003800347,0.002424673,0.014310997,0.003083589,0.0045726886,0.0019089315,0.000028986482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013785604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028679017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013785604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018891538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059456524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027410746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063254755","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.014","title":"Performance of an agro-forestry based Payments-for-Environmental-Services project in Mozambique: A household level analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; International Development Research Centre; World Bank Group","keywords":"Payment; Business; Consumption (sociology); Household income; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Propensity score matching; Cash; Impact evaluation; Distribution (mathematics); Scale (ratio); Natural resource economics; Socioeconomics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.056967139625171616,"score_gpt":0.2025208703582284,"score_spread":0.1455537307330568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063254755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99904555,0.000020164101,0.000049164537,0.00008414602,8.730922e-7,0.000037546968,0.0001931572,0.0000027662027,0.00056662475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990497,0.00002558824,0.000081854494,0.000021016282,0.0000013218465,0.000030288911,0.00019053316,0.0000015004562,0.00059821416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740195,0.0011821485,0.00006505561,0.00011554295,0.00012701412,0.0011083843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581283,0.0011221219,0.00083787204,0.00015118958,0.0005527665,0.0015232897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002673479,0.00039405894,0.0004695296,0.00091073354,0.0013252787,0.0015875539,0.0007892411,0.0012863304,0.0016558211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053273723,0.00031852143,0.00047994187,0.0016800419,0.0010704212,0.00069330446,0.0013133422,0.0011377486,0.00029423754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018022102,0.0018789719,0.9527431,0.00016636285,0.0004529784,0.0014913003,0.0031551835,0.015840322,0.0019680182,0.0013768369,0.0011772807,0.01794739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055669563,0.0008653785,0.98989934,0.000020069807,0.00008751021,0.000084635685,0.0041683367,0.0038890627,0.00033168207,0.00010827774,0.00047620447,0.000013964815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23777978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41375557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23777978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006286642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004902011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47279155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066555278","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.007","title":"The ‘neighbor effect’: Simulating dynamics in consumer preferences for new vehicle technologies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":287,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Discrete choice; Scrutiny; Market penetration; Preference; Alternative fuel vehicle; Consumer behaviour; Theory of planned behavior; Marketing; Economics; Driving range; Electric vehicle; Environmental economics; Business; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Engineering; Control (management)","score_opus":0.019192691490069243,"score_gpt":0.2299593888287355,"score_spread":0.21076669733866626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066555278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719579,0.00010948753,0.01905607,0.0005616498,0.000092678274,0.000030745377,0.00033730708,0.00008317957,0.007770943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924407,0.000058558177,0.0054401224,0.000100355035,0.000015325104,0.00003081488,0.00017197964,0.000029734481,0.0017123796],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997135,0.00015009048,0.000008775661,0.000045720386,0.000022196526,0.000059717015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764794,0.0017982861,0.0001001011,0.00013136688,0.00012119686,0.00020111758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095602474,0.00042405308,0.0007923382,0.0006420277,0.0007026574,0.0010726077,0.0017448431,0.0023105224,0.0069401828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047601894,0.0006134906,0.0011935754,0.0009209505,0.00093288574,0.0021597277,0.0009918007,0.0017873811,0.00025988545],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011479339,0.00013711063,0.0041806153,0.00001998586,0.00005614782,0.000054742013,0.00011906166,0.9821414,0.00026136707,0.010286981,0.0006834929,0.0019444022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003512183,0.000022171353,0.0005147637,0.0000018563454,0.000009801402,0.000004376457,0.000034696564,0.9976801,0.00006410099,0.0014500654,0.00017543124,0.000007479032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07046692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05468651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07046692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011976537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072790927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14011353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206838067","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.009","title":"The Kenneth E. Boulding Memorial Award 2014","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Ecological economics; Presentation (obstetrics); Principal (computer security); Environmental ethics; Economic history; Economics; History; Ecology; Art history; Philosophy; Sustainability; Biology","score_opus":0.006188188358804333,"score_gpt":0.20655422753668803,"score_spread":0.2003660391778837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W206838067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023813415,0.016739784,0.0021945331,0.29145446,0.13157783,0.00010334185,0.0015368661,0.0005228295,0.553489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048424774,0.0045321765,0.00060226617,0.00484254,0.0037848707,0.000018630551,0.0004327903,0.000080023274,0.9808642],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990497,0.0000970528,0.000030200217,0.000107941756,0.00051220285,0.00020274008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961759,0.00017879099,0.000090821064,0.0001536212,0.0010708284,0.0023299947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019832586,0.000594818,0.00059610576,0.001155264,0.0014035478,0.0035994244,0.0008011952,0.003852876,0.27487352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041316464,0.00036026892,0.00051349006,0.00073491316,0.0008584981,0.0018150416,0.004067079,0.0031061203,0.13306499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026463233,0.000031432548,0.00021989994,0.000021681892,0.000004668918,0.000019758276,0.000013542636,0.000038915463,0.00009501091,0.00403438,0.9700726,0.025421597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060678217,0.00001631089,0.0009168283,0.0000512647,0.0000034144944,0.000032897195,0.000058033587,0.00006420046,0.00007695765,0.0011905641,0.9975782,0.0000052073265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056459256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02491179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27487352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026464108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060938094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91954356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069206726","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.005","title":"An analysis of a brownlash report","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.06323992382721443,"score_gpt":0.25453840736531574,"score_spread":0.1912984835381013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069206726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37814677,0.0030603006,0.025701929,0.03457868,0.001571775,0.00039416357,0.008667986,0.0016111493,0.5462672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68732536,0.0012330752,0.0060480963,0.0024378337,0.00054346863,0.00020075202,0.0031883372,0.00043035817,0.29859266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783957,0.00040662196,0.00008951076,0.00016184241,0.0010343745,0.00046808977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908921,0.004387629,0.0004769151,0.00073786255,0.0030573665,0.00044817987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028061941,0.0003008509,0.00035210446,0.0027424032,0.0020696297,0.0024863216,0.00079094566,0.0013736194,0.027945215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013917004,0.0002463047,0.0007065389,0.002025026,0.0007302375,0.001274438,0.00084436033,0.0014104862,0.004395102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005068975,0.00020518282,0.009995788,0.0000981188,0.00006405557,0.00093341264,0.0011991772,0.0043277307,0.0011336508,0.63594335,0.2818544,0.0637382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017801207,0.0004162918,0.044965643,0.00017153262,0.00021108332,0.0008302766,0.0034833865,0.028949121,0.006770183,0.1725635,0.74129176,0.0001692126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05241416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032693494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05241416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028793432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00414028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104218125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073988666","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.017","title":"Managing invasive species: Rules of thumb for rapid assessment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Rule of thumb; Damages; Usability; Control (management); Invasive species; Balance (ability); Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental resource management; Computer science; Business; Management science; Environmental planning; Ecology; Economics; Biology; Political science; Geography; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.019560025083145832,"score_gpt":0.24464689795352307,"score_spread":0.22508687287037724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073988666","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020265847,0.0028326362,0.94552875,0.006814392,0.00040194334,0.0013428115,0.0009003236,0.0014747174,0.020438533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16605043,0.0014226488,0.8279437,0.0008959934,0.00019460413,0.0012525322,0.00053275656,0.0002294432,0.0014779345],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98728484,0.005515017,0.0015062486,0.0010447568,0.0042835153,0.00036552918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94345933,0.0355765,0.0054449984,0.0040847478,0.01018645,0.0012480115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03058643,0.0029783724,0.0035147402,0.005192244,0.002543268,0.008825392,0.005267177,0.0052982448,0.006155316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112528585,0.0011403733,0.0015354918,0.0024557775,0.0021659732,0.0078361565,0.0025384766,0.005356572,0.003631008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033821652,0.0005462639,0.023013582,0.0016399564,0.0008505,0.0006468566,0.0005637498,0.23659809,0.0024509565,0.10513307,0.06286043,0.5653584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001834076,0.00023507321,0.0067771403,0.0018802773,0.00047484782,0.0010568569,0.00076780556,0.4023628,0.0023442165,0.55817705,0.025470216,0.00027028754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040064557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010337803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03058643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024687743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004276797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16175848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076715122","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.006","title":"A Box-Cox Double-Hurdle model of wildlife valuation: The citizen's perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Wildlife; Contingent valuation; Valuation (finance); Payment; Willingness to pay; Actuarial science; Wildlife conservation; Preference elicitation; Public economics; Preference; Economics; Public good; Marketing; Business; Microeconomics; Computer science; Ecology; Finance","score_opus":0.14022959396312548,"score_gpt":0.23884079330361607,"score_spread":0.09861119934049059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076715122","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14231132,0.005227489,0.75459135,0.03283904,0.00086389895,0.00014493174,0.001191122,0.0003437849,0.062487137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91448516,0.0036693213,0.020736985,0.0009128534,0.0007851451,0.00012709945,0.00031740373,0.000079976984,0.05888608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981652,0.0010302543,0.00005450726,0.00028238367,0.00018823065,0.0002794723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990622,0.007114695,0.00060055003,0.0003928712,0.0006194664,0.0006503745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059445566,0.0011474534,0.0028693639,0.0013368306,0.0010766366,0.0058985604,0.0035089296,0.006318396,0.010266688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016270094,0.0011594064,0.0016105345,0.0018958477,0.0037786323,0.008427051,0.0017343905,0.005075393,0.0010456847],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001169397,0.00009511465,0.0016772364,0.00008117545,0.00006457789,0.00044671886,0.00021472842,0.16000406,0.000149207,0.825816,0.005506384,0.00582786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006727216,0.00004365176,0.00043040077,0.000027553619,0.000034614375,0.000158129,0.00013715694,0.4182704,0.000058116457,0.57844645,0.0022777668,0.000048548536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011154628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007382869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011154628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019970566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019203852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034345508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079562420","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.008","title":"Insiders, outsiders, and the adaptability of informal rules to ecological shocks","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptability; Economics; Ecology; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental ethics; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02751647765112415,"score_gpt":0.24708302807042348,"score_spread":0.21956655041929934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079562420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98698694,0.000051377207,0.0011054408,0.0004582311,0.000007628744,0.0000091355505,0.000021392569,0.0000070224214,0.01135279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995227,0.000025477626,0.000069824244,0.000025881234,0.0000047734,0.0000023082391,0.000007409768,0.000002297653,0.00033934214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904436,0.0004605492,0.00005779565,0.00011709051,0.00012299122,0.0001971499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858291,0.0072197393,0.0037271576,0.001663047,0.00047696856,0.0010839389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024836785,0.00012948258,0.00036507333,0.00061003305,0.00084625924,0.004539494,0.00044847504,0.0013289504,0.00473093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013878586,0.00023525333,0.0002743006,0.0004949763,0.0033070822,0.00216454,0.0013090632,0.0009555535,0.00029574896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010278723,0.0015289043,0.68337107,0.00012655089,0.0003578805,0.0015351318,0.018575063,0.042907786,0.0067988606,0.19214097,0.0018916195,0.049738362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014744843,0.0003440312,0.7123033,0.000055572127,0.00011773419,0.0004699267,0.019304574,0.027229957,0.0011364507,0.23189156,0.0069020195,0.00009738434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024607424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027489525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00473093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079883763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004912391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015826583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087206104","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.018","title":"Economic incentives and natural resource management among small-scale farmers: Addressing the missing link","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Transaction cost; Natural resource management; Natural resource; Resource management (computing); Business; Scale (ratio); Resource (disambiguation); Investment (military); Economics; Incentive program; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.015231045653850094,"score_gpt":0.20134228138019755,"score_spread":0.18611123572634747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087206104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89254504,0.0033747267,0.010441866,0.074419424,0.00016814309,0.00004905382,0.00010450861,0.0000144191135,0.018882904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984193,0.00045962175,0.00033861824,0.00037254617,0.00006365935,0.0000073950478,0.0000043407617,0.0000011062309,0.0003333607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987332,0.00071092334,0.0000359453,0.0001281665,0.00011653677,0.00027513382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766434,0.017399129,0.003365135,0.00045672312,0.00067806826,0.0014575906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039083487,0.0002743032,0.00058630196,0.0005597534,0.0010154916,0.002927219,0.0008514005,0.002368845,0.006334706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01679055,0.00021971443,0.00018847747,0.0006732082,0.0034439645,0.0055019483,0.0024832722,0.001711529,0.000117675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087402907,0.002085185,0.25850204,0.0008057287,0.0004688412,0.0015087314,0.004409854,0.029705746,0.0027836387,0.5429531,0.008066198,0.14783683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013355415,0.00032297353,0.15389132,0.00034503656,0.00015651647,0.00027999652,0.01563265,0.038090315,0.00044819014,0.7827471,0.007860826,0.00009149493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038658984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067044664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006334706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013956565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002669105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021191657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090017401","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.014","title":"Do conservation auctions crowd out voluntary environmentally friendly activities?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Alberta Water Research Institute","keywords":"Common value auction; Crowding out; Incentive; Crowding; Turnover; Business; Public economics; Crowdsourcing; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Microeconomics; Social preferences; Marketing; Environmental economics; Psychology; Political science; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.031094072854394302,"score_gpt":0.2907493542294987,"score_spread":0.2596552813751044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090017401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805397,0.00029696236,0.0013631462,0.0019293933,0.000040046165,0.000034173358,0.00005980522,0.000018696086,0.015718143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985306,0.00004986426,0.00020673049,0.00026315404,0.000016428612,0.000011032521,0.000019987376,0.0000055003297,0.00089652924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977817,0.0010854889,0.000092511444,0.00029197164,0.0003810466,0.00036726217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92784226,0.048174612,0.015965076,0.0046492754,0.0015843305,0.001784463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007266901,0.0004252979,0.000999366,0.0010196267,0.001018779,0.0034679687,0.0009203145,0.0034798326,0.012262533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038662907,0.00066891045,0.00043719538,0.0009108555,0.0033971,0.0040692873,0.0010681882,0.0011461223,0.0007646759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064453194,0.005014892,0.69217336,0.00057404826,0.0010870058,0.0009267585,0.00457991,0.019679284,0.007429703,0.14578165,0.010171203,0.106136926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007623164,0.00078305276,0.79451114,0.00014200315,0.00031741243,0.0005271566,0.014540297,0.041294813,0.0022866318,0.13584258,0.008827842,0.00016486358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047452403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008093232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012262533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012473108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095979025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04102224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090787680","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.003","title":"What matters and why? Ecosystem services and their bundled qualities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Nature Conservancy","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Valuation (finance); Function (biology); Environmental resource management; Business; Production (economics); Marketing; Ecosystem; Sociology; Economics; Ecology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.00916344558941495,"score_gpt":0.1819763894997342,"score_spread":0.17281294391031923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090787680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8442545,0.015359809,0.03995703,0.032257732,0.00043777854,0.000053305186,0.0009175264,0.00014541279,0.06661691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99303585,0.0015031331,0.0037065987,0.00031954492,0.00014432913,0.000017711378,0.00005563863,0.000029672294,0.0011875919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988681,0.00037461816,0.00006524089,0.00017448615,0.00036239254,0.00015517758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949063,0.0021755195,0.0010393106,0.0003338336,0.0007610948,0.0007839668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017648159,0.00040705825,0.00075298396,0.0024272304,0.00079228764,0.005260453,0.00051116676,0.0010120417,0.006570272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011061263,0.00036686906,0.000436387,0.005128342,0.004013494,0.014137406,0.0021835826,0.0013134367,0.00042269338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017159684,0.00012670689,0.1117063,0.00036757032,0.0005194328,0.00023840385,0.0027281768,0.004441277,0.0022270977,0.75731045,0.005200703,0.1149623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020073641,0.0000783222,0.09445049,0.00016538438,0.00010771737,0.00040470035,0.0034676574,0.0051524844,0.00028056873,0.8803518,0.0154808955,0.000040021954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005089138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062422436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006570272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020597186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007067541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02197975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099647677","doi":"10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00149-x","title":"SPECIAL SECTION: LAND USE OPTIONS IN DRY TROPICAL WOODLAND ECOSYSTEMS IN ZIMBABWE","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland; Carbon sequestration; Firewood; Ecosystem services; Agroforestry; Agriculture; Natural resource economics; Incentive; Land use; Ecosystem; Agricultural land; Geography; Environmental science; Agricultural economics; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.016966051642827065,"score_gpt":0.1808434492194427,"score_spread":0.16387739757661562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099647677","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044842236,0.091344394,0.0015260347,0.23608275,0.5592893,0.00036965575,0.0059115742,0.00021287084,0.060421206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14086057,0.10296781,0.0010512349,0.038540587,0.40169305,0.00047436313,0.003711087,0.00024826702,0.310453],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973756,0.000048814654,0.000040484247,0.000035149686,0.000047258894,0.00009064241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988814,0.00043006786,0.00014246821,0.00004264255,0.00026858525,0.00023478399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006612395,0.00077571877,0.0009677292,0.0015282168,0.0012220396,0.0023050562,0.00083868596,0.0024783162,0.03040866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020386842,0.00031069666,0.0005856142,0.0015798798,0.00058038236,0.0011977404,0.0008625971,0.0012554833,0.0025201018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009465242,0.000060508726,0.002581494,0.0003393272,0.000022307007,0.00042733658,0.00013624204,0.00022000633,0.00068838487,0.0013687178,0.97758603,0.01647495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004268245,0.000094429204,0.029486854,0.0004135322,0.00007303239,0.0004956748,0.0006160087,0.0006362952,0.00050561654,0.0016909137,0.96591794,0.000027061882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008999333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031241124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03040866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001102367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008510014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10172707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099985860","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.021","title":"An integrated decision-support approach in prioritizing risks of non-indigenous species in the face of high uncertainty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Australian Government","keywords":"Negotiation; Risk analysis (engineering); Process (computing); Indigenous; Prioritization; Risk management; Risk assessment; Uncertainty; Computer science; Decision support system; Management science; Environmental resource management; Business; Ecology; Economics; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04756225558100446,"score_gpt":0.2666782392646889,"score_spread":0.21911598368368446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099985860","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1657955,0.00056173455,0.8096674,0.0042817,0.00016447136,0.0006413911,0.00029751373,0.00031443287,0.018275853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8249849,0.00022319904,0.17256609,0.0002862777,0.000099765864,0.0003038784,0.00012172547,0.000024595214,0.0013897516],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713373,0.0015390102,0.00015051989,0.00025682038,0.00062254467,0.0002974161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939135,0.0044418387,0.00038935995,0.000120200675,0.0006716825,0.0004634907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070629525,0.0011327395,0.0017782518,0.0022538644,0.0010338929,0.004665499,0.0020942488,0.0022823634,0.0049509658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011040263,0.000890373,0.0010736596,0.0015839022,0.0012005046,0.0035507726,0.002968436,0.001905684,0.000297146],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005988819,0.0008918832,0.005064146,0.00023242498,0.0005668235,0.0004936884,0.00041920488,0.84575397,0.0017026053,0.028432362,0.0021727385,0.113671385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010473493,0.00016575828,0.00086362584,0.000045604396,0.00012848679,0.00006095685,0.00020049237,0.966208,0.00037406394,0.030827908,0.0009909265,0.000029522216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067263814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010844995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070629525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023274336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041610384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03735292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116649276","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.003","title":"Shadow prices of environmental outputs and production efficiency of household-level paper recycling units in Vietnam","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow price; Production (economics); Economics; Shadow (psychology); Capital (architecture); Environmental pollution; Pollution; Estimation; Environmental quality; Natural resource economics; Production function; Function (biology); Econometrics; Agricultural economics; Environmental science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Environmental protection; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.04324630514072446,"score_gpt":0.20036419490616736,"score_spread":0.1571178897654429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116649276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977558,0.000036393,0.00027903204,0.0001270524,0.0000016595475,0.0000028106067,0.0001688589,0.0000041605476,0.0016241187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993025,0.000019675175,0.00003073449,0.000003447854,7.657657e-7,0.0000010398902,0.00004837811,0.0000010873662,0.0005924322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972564,0.00007429634,0.000014909529,0.00004510888,0.000029091227,0.00011091076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830854,0.0007990493,0.00041248396,0.00006276144,0.00019626808,0.00022096117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052763126,0.000097924254,0.00022976485,0.00032765177,0.00028295573,0.0012518066,0.00032183333,0.00029604544,0.0031020124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016347675,0.00031234114,0.00022245411,0.0006364192,0.00057448796,0.0009200567,0.00029483144,0.00047360914,0.00015538723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068193034,0.00024141843,0.8084555,0.00011958946,0.0001368268,0.0021835156,0.0028482622,0.10768239,0.0035347443,0.05597683,0.0020369943,0.016102012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000579947,0.00013796621,0.82546204,0.000024237379,0.0000591707,0.00031067632,0.008177569,0.1499134,0.0021549412,0.01091231,0.0027452216,0.000044399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10021208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07889769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10021208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001267836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19925761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118181057","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.001","title":"Strategic importance of green water in international crop trade","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundación Caja Madrid","keywords":"Virtual water; Commodity; Grain trade; Water resources; International trade and water; Water use; Water security; Business; Water trading; Water conservation; Productivity; Food security; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Water scarcity; International trade; Economics; Agriculture; Trade barrier; Agronomy; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.014515219588508394,"score_gpt":0.22876782305413298,"score_spread":0.21425260346562458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118181057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77487487,0.0009610938,0.0018835932,0.0018581197,0.000027385227,0.000023177286,0.00008650669,0.0000061885626,0.22027911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771714,0.0002338698,0.00015726857,0.000042239946,0.0000059235817,0.0000038137164,0.000016331875,0.0000019751556,0.001821346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995683,0.00014698417,0.000015019217,0.00006073659,0.00009381793,0.00011519681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900097,0.00039592758,0.00030269573,0.000042170013,0.00011313729,0.00014513213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005495229,0.00013220047,0.00012245661,0.0006799077,0.0008726299,0.002634152,0.00014178887,0.00037842177,0.0049585807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016233973,0.00008254753,0.00014732398,0.0012467128,0.0019864154,0.0021618374,0.0014744856,0.00062181137,0.00014192279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040946022,0.00023470397,0.306003,0.00042390428,0.00006942829,0.0027916345,0.02547687,0.009507742,0.0049344264,0.50852615,0.003812302,0.1378103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028617695,0.00023046545,0.5317359,0.00043034204,0.000087391105,0.00067353004,0.102117814,0.007259142,0.0023682225,0.2278435,0.12714562,0.00007943759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050898963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012597298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050898963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021752974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014431422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016588092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129380331","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.011","title":"Constant per capita consumption paths with exhaustible resources and decaying produced capital","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Per capita; Consumption (sociology); Capital (architecture); Constant (computer programming); Population growth; Growth model; Technical progress; Natural resource economics; Capital accumulation; Population; Agricultural economics; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.02586341947580234,"score_gpt":0.20141741231675897,"score_spread":0.17555399284095663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129380331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70274943,0.0020166542,0.25223634,0.0075376923,0.00011783908,0.00007655039,0.0022482218,0.0004419461,0.032575317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465893,0.0022825203,0.026626451,0.000385042,0.0000801251,0.00010832844,0.0008135178,0.0001581863,0.02295648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995221,0.00019003043,0.000016285932,0.00009925431,0.00004240156,0.00012991221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923683,0.0049586645,0.0012112645,0.0005326533,0.0005021285,0.00042696018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020335983,0.0010738259,0.0010630292,0.0012459998,0.0006856769,0.003160584,0.002387642,0.003017255,0.008868421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014100132,0.0010959333,0.0013297518,0.0026082501,0.0027263255,0.007907554,0.0015472111,0.002593851,0.00064279576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017641747,0.000061336534,0.0043099476,0.00019248201,0.00006152459,0.0005419182,0.00027295476,0.19825877,0.0007826593,0.7848835,0.0030754623,0.0073830253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107962216,0.00003544943,0.0030830237,0.00006456328,0.000054631975,0.00045571435,0.00025636377,0.30532724,0.0003570629,0.68794817,0.0022488364,0.000061087776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008933259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00526353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008933259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021959643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011421932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029667854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131356814","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.11.014","title":"Niche construction, co-evolution and biodiversity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Royal Society","keywords":"Niche; Niche construction; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Trophic level; Ecological niche; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Function (biology); Functional ecology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ecosystem services; Environmental niche modelling; Biology; Environmental science; Computer science; Evolutionary biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.013355962108916012,"score_gpt":0.18994256563086612,"score_spread":0.1765866035219501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131356814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868187,0.0014339159,0.0053330143,0.0003580582,0.000008196048,0.0000059444583,0.000026705138,0.0000072640323,0.006008233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873,0.00019772342,0.0007233664,0.000013665991,0.0000074321324,0.0000034144553,0.000010118462,0.000003025992,0.0003112359],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993586,0.0003856809,0.000015975009,0.0000886978,0.00006934471,0.00008174568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508107,0.003556804,0.00047837684,0.0002911109,0.00013022513,0.00046233696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016592955,0.00024487122,0.00035858533,0.0014529182,0.0004927607,0.0020416968,0.00044671271,0.0008810863,0.0037326086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053917,0.00025992907,0.00028749093,0.0015913357,0.0028063648,0.0021819232,0.0011881845,0.00052514713,0.0001355509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052112015,0.00030050616,0.7323014,0.0002462006,0.0006094002,0.00054242363,0.0012534042,0.013500846,0.0074169273,0.17492284,0.00057539175,0.06780953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033680553,0.00013178022,0.72693354,0.000032486823,0.00012966493,0.0014560898,0.002129845,0.030627092,0.0005336519,0.2358315,0.0021245587,0.00003612776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018892922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005314965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037326086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007773227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030567893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012486875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132102506","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.001","title":"Trade-offs between conservation and socio-economic objectives in managing a tropical marine ecosystem","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Fishing; Business; Ecosystem services; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Fisheries management; Ecosystem; Marine conservation; Marine ecosystem; Fishery; Economics; Geography; Ecology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.017759539222164344,"score_gpt":0.23828804393396613,"score_spread":0.2205285047118018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132102506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9483173,0.0006926549,0.0035366677,0.0031249595,0.000023272689,0.00005131105,0.000052439715,0.0000103774855,0.04419109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873596,0.00008953993,0.0004443171,0.00005479007,0.000010409904,0.000008448345,0.0000038416347,0.0000029043877,0.0006498157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876165,0.00069676293,0.00007362614,0.000052568725,0.00019878813,0.00021660348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99369353,0.004125152,0.0008659559,0.000118753174,0.0003287343,0.0008678524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052577765,0.00027924235,0.00026703003,0.0011536194,0.0011416173,0.0035228394,0.0005229812,0.0013645536,0.005127775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011382788,0.00029733617,0.00026642124,0.00094295776,0.0020054956,0.002357514,0.0017944801,0.0010283863,0.00015906653],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003505499,0.0017927669,0.27179384,0.00071722094,0.0006403604,0.0020195746,0.0029339248,0.26812735,0.012245918,0.25024623,0.0031341922,0.18284325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033943757,0.0013744391,0.46217543,0.00027972064,0.00050725305,0.0012249185,0.014156072,0.18989629,0.0031479425,0.31829226,0.008472478,0.00013369584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024102884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012193472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052577765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030569346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001598076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138920617","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.024","title":"There is no silver bullet: The value of diversification in planning invasive species surveillance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Ontario Forest Research Institute; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Portfolio; Business; Expert elicitation; Silver bullet; PEST analysis; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geography; Finance; Marketing","score_opus":0.013458171360528516,"score_gpt":0.19274197097376145,"score_spread":0.17928379961323293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138920617","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2638794,0.02359551,0.1055741,0.52592963,0.0024371517,0.00017005554,0.000573064,0.00015635158,0.077684745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971611,0.0027575626,0.013847732,0.008642395,0.001255005,0.00006354635,0.000039563613,0.00006715956,0.0017160062],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98933303,0.007545194,0.00034222152,0.00068034604,0.0017130557,0.00038618775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88378465,0.092834026,0.0063879797,0.0066971635,0.006426604,0.0038696053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030181307,0.0006148044,0.0012538173,0.0025110717,0.0020341994,0.005355259,0.0023086856,0.0048426995,0.0066158506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09829558,0.0007007943,0.00093194225,0.0014709696,0.015674511,0.018350627,0.0040535275,0.005744391,0.0005910714],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013523998,0.00039037934,0.10897638,0.0011353787,0.0011990223,0.0010408309,0.0017600501,0.030432291,0.0012907883,0.28479046,0.03484075,0.5327914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014532162,0.00053092657,0.029732525,0.0012260472,0.00031856733,0.0011446271,0.0048605255,0.024601862,0.0007550105,0.9136331,0.022889659,0.00016182465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004218153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011134339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030181307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033721128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024603317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15961587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142411771","doi":"10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00199-3","title":"The Kyoto protocol and payments for tropical forest:","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Tinker Foundation; U.S. Department of Energy; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Tropical forest; Carbon sequestration; Carbon sink; Clean Development Mechanism; Ecosystem services; Carbon market; Reforestation; Payment; Payment for ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Order (exchange); Carbon offset; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Climate change; Business; Ecology; Economics; Agroforestry; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.0122050456620408,"score_gpt":0.2419552346378949,"score_spread":0.22975018897585409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142411771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06574977,0.015990464,0.027985828,0.16688876,0.011607484,0.00041349148,0.002772475,0.0005734244,0.70801824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75767624,0.009326733,0.01641914,0.030643092,0.0058506643,0.0011154512,0.0011445866,0.00044088453,0.17738307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957306,0.0009966049,0.0002921968,0.00037080733,0.0018612533,0.00074858044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967091,0.00140977,0.00031999339,0.00039890755,0.0007369839,0.00042523223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00582756,0.0008500135,0.00055623276,0.0013686547,0.0025133444,0.0065959897,0.001342335,0.009514326,0.012346806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020265803,0.000555945,0.0005357264,0.0020986572,0.0032624137,0.009814626,0.002663227,0.008571972,0.0015176934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076058874,0.000027889333,0.0003625861,0.0000705112,0.000012086237,0.00005531797,0.00022723342,0.0009645234,0.00031671862,0.9452142,0.035094757,0.01757802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009957695,0.000036051726,0.0055431644,0.00024848993,0.000047519756,0.0001542203,0.0003046013,0.0022422578,0.00053282804,0.7375189,0.2531913,0.000081142854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01536915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019005349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01536915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041205348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008559795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04130417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146904012","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.031","title":"Prosocial behavior and incentives: Evidence from field experiments in rural Mexico and Tanzania","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"World Agroforestry Centre; Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Michigan State University; United States Agency for International Development; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Incentive; Prosocial behavior; Payment; Public economics; Tanzania; Distrust; Premise; Economics; Business; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.08386047576948277,"score_gpt":0.334920429353972,"score_spread":0.2510599535844892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146904012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993468,0.00004144039,0.00007727125,0.00005008677,9.5734e-7,0.000011164353,0.000016274755,0.0000012380514,0.0004548638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992119,0.00008979712,0.00031206626,0.000040758892,0.0000023172202,0.000045223027,0.00002557373,0.0000011581124,0.00027127657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.999064,0.0007038935,0.00002873366,0.0000755116,0.000051768508,0.00007610602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835271,0.011577789,0.0031776733,0.0008709138,0.00035438302,0.0004920681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027928983,0.0003731455,0.0003782198,0.000571733,0.0011450262,0.00066742545,0.00050361827,0.00071800343,0.003237246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007838614,0.00027905047,0.00016656493,0.00045445387,0.0017339579,0.00055146666,0.00052247127,0.0005976147,0.00014244815],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019596301,0.03476518,0.7866975,0.0008636909,0.00076604023,0.0010254212,0.011650942,0.0028393746,0.058843028,0.012331987,0.0020433117,0.06857722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010045862,0.006313336,0.9747809,0.00009945006,0.00025990335,0.00022685889,0.0059308647,0.0030794402,0.0038521353,0.0029849932,0.0014252854,0.000042187825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009395288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020915229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009395288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008174248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005552703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018681228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190523531","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.012","title":"Opening the black box of energy throughputs in farm systems: A decomposition analysis between the energy returns to external inputs, internal biomass reuses and total inputs consumed (the Vallès County, Catalonia, c.1860 and 1999)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Work (physics); Agriculture; Environmental science; Production (economics); Sustainability; Agricultural engineering; Agricultural science; Energy (signal processing); Environmental economics; Business; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics; Geography; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.013840721159843512,"score_gpt":0.23722186642116458,"score_spread":0.22338114526132108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190523531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875448,0.00085920346,0.0077419113,0.0002007173,0.00001286164,0.000033849927,0.0014057144,0.000023825121,0.002177231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950192,0.00022316155,0.0028539803,0.000017898705,0.0000068840473,0.000024384432,0.0005138728,0.000018965005,0.0013216028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950993,0.00014513823,0.00002183787,0.00010782796,0.00008491778,0.00013028967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913836,0.0005350519,0.00010506417,0.00006197805,0.0001002277,0.000059312708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015276675,0.00047109017,0.00040986782,0.0012965222,0.00022895703,0.0018577415,0.00045979608,0.0003992601,0.002083502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019271345,0.00038184135,0.0012279353,0.001422296,0.0009692712,0.0009847863,0.0009588676,0.0005900568,0.00017853887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010259849,0.00030445986,0.42138317,0.0005415299,0.0012536217,0.0004827943,0.00161503,0.41248554,0.010709698,0.049253922,0.004712575,0.096231714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032037147,0.00022285232,0.7906965,0.00015269585,0.0003121234,0.000065637854,0.0015833455,0.18057619,0.0016896767,0.0200044,0.004602666,0.00006192955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074662246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0632235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074662246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004264104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001308782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14845532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195198209","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.007","title":"Debunking trickle-down ecosystem services: The fallacy of omnipotent, homogeneous beneficiaries","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Business; Stakeholder; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Service (business); Goods and services; Natural resource economics; Ecosystem management; Environmental economics; Economics; Marketing; Ecology","score_opus":0.01783953341147444,"score_gpt":0.19650815918543815,"score_spread":0.17866862577396372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195198209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6185052,0.0028379813,0.11735747,0.07383889,0.0002926505,0.00018972227,0.0003418515,0.00024582088,0.18639037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98699874,0.0003806752,0.0063496144,0.0025539452,0.00012377587,0.00005509981,0.000022930366,0.000066797606,0.0034483753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995218,0.0019239609,0.00015521534,0.0008990872,0.0011196254,0.00068416854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97845536,0.011004719,0.0021463656,0.0047194813,0.0017573345,0.001916828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014828639,0.00047083205,0.0015187735,0.0015838434,0.0022055705,0.005719487,0.0014689462,0.0030056713,0.00946417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040212788,0.00051753334,0.00060905213,0.00095556665,0.017740255,0.011791638,0.0059939255,0.0046133017,0.0009458308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001823193,0.000108083565,0.008494052,0.00008881754,0.00011158674,0.00020321079,0.0009608308,0.0011795517,0.0012838253,0.9345643,0.0038718325,0.048951562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042244585,0.000028672817,0.0030702977,0.00004007563,0.000028389273,0.0001412307,0.00037705296,0.0021442114,0.0004009272,0.9895309,0.0041822377,0.000013859096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015943644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021629569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014828639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019486516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015944131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07842225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278017839","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.017","title":"A rural myth? Sources and implications of the perceived unfairness of carbon taxes in rural communities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"Environment Canada; Carbon Management Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Economics; Opposition (politics); Carbon tax; Public economics; Disadvantaged; Revenue; Population; Tax reform; Economic growth; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Finance; Greenhouse gas","score_opus":0.028413295611288903,"score_gpt":0.20875940337943236,"score_spread":0.18034610776814344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278017839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9032243,0.0007038104,0.0010496291,0.069952115,0.000051600386,0.000018573375,0.0001252001,0.000008530616,0.02486623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991055,0.000102806946,0.000036716177,0.00048450616,0.000019720737,0.0000020762602,0.000005686921,0.0000024348226,0.00024042102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973008,0.0015092066,0.000056441924,0.00016833967,0.000520788,0.00044430996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763056,0.010620379,0.0063502695,0.0007481875,0.0038825304,0.0020930304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004684145,0.00010149638,0.00024197614,0.0015047889,0.0023364772,0.0034513678,0.0006435089,0.0013138421,0.0046164207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02662294,0.00016940608,0.0001321982,0.0027563598,0.0060652527,0.0026271348,0.0023163215,0.0025608551,0.00011231418],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005388497,0.0005215876,0.34162056,0.00041533425,0.00034682226,0.0017099443,0.18952617,0.0025758715,0.0016274622,0.35519448,0.017758202,0.08816476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008873119,0.00015035499,0.41949567,0.0006208914,0.00013619852,0.00060393574,0.38209412,0.0026884626,0.000909895,0.1393447,0.05377161,0.00009554028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027632141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04852019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027632141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004210011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032645264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054942608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283830242","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.018","title":"Economic viability and small-scale fisheries — A review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Profitability index; Scale (ratio); Fishing; Sustainability; Fisheries law; Business; Fishery; Fisheries management; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Finance; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.0418292509389675,"score_gpt":0.2780266871825944,"score_spread":0.23619743624362688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283830242","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013374422,0.998844,0.000052407468,0.00026316,0.00008383751,0.0000020649875,0.000026261012,0.0000012617347,0.0005932182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011541873,0.9984365,0.0000736179,0.00008362527,0.00010499108,0.0000025515883,0.00002152639,5.519765e-7,0.00012249674],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996184,0.00007231221,0.000061899234,0.00006823451,0.00014942583,0.000029709294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821126,0.001273019,0.00025100072,0.000025057083,0.00017298441,0.00006665544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011485355,0.00086516363,0.0014439732,0.004154251,0.00030812266,0.0023761878,0.0008722586,0.0014296958,0.005343991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003515901,0.00030605923,0.00067754055,0.008979143,0.0008522292,0.0025779721,0.0010687811,0.0011974678,0.0006213857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092810216,0.00006633341,0.0009348619,0.042548925,0.00031818636,0.00015490284,0.00009374505,0.00070088776,0.00028983326,0.011343812,0.031039642,0.91241604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003259575,0.00008899858,0.006587067,0.04716186,0.0010655876,0.0009376322,0.00048508233,0.00036179012,0.00019480742,0.02053664,0.9224801,0.00006779979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004116326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007851679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005343991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001213378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032800213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01787746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298062990","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.005","title":"Status concern and the exploitation of common pool renewable resources","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Common-pool resource; Commons; Oligopoly; Economics; Resource (disambiguation); Microeconomics; Non-renewable resource; Renewable resource; Natural resource economics; Business; Renewable energy; Ecology; Cournot competition","score_opus":0.03628183489732639,"score_gpt":0.2156243732839984,"score_spread":0.179342538386672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298062990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89969367,0.0017122353,0.004015676,0.0060375645,0.000042079246,0.000018989462,0.00017973848,0.000013402472,0.08828672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529207,0.00023580214,0.00009257714,0.00008388411,0.000027505888,0.0000027628018,0.000021462178,0.0000025488655,0.0042414707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995634,0.00011047149,0.000022208267,0.00006848801,0.00014490934,0.00009053739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544597,0.0015167529,0.0018802854,0.00020290888,0.0005014561,0.00045264172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013752092,0.00014055609,0.00021987874,0.00094486127,0.0008382154,0.0030284857,0.00045143176,0.0012137243,0.00510951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007903245,0.000108096545,0.00017802313,0.0011319875,0.0017391341,0.0033175538,0.0014355856,0.0008878857,0.0001791955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003068776,0.00018703943,0.2130152,0.000117023395,0.000092993425,0.0013574183,0.0028584858,0.012724671,0.0015149016,0.693702,0.0068061897,0.06731715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041388965,0.0002990608,0.42042658,0.00024202104,0.00017308953,0.0009521605,0.009225387,0.034798365,0.0010060254,0.46892652,0.06381286,0.000096573494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013044343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027642002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013044343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001870019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008865319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025936842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298980701","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.003","title":"The urban political ecology of ecosystem services: The case of Barcelona","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European Commission; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Ecosystem valuation; Valuation (finance); Politics; Agriculture; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment; Ecosystem; Environmental resource management; Political science; Geography; Business; Economics; Ecology; Ecosystem health","score_opus":0.008046022363324327,"score_gpt":0.1951998997958032,"score_spread":0.18715387743247888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298980701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8500481,0.002467906,0.0013853433,0.010129837,0.00009431453,0.00001946617,0.00016887013,0.00003516159,0.1356509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948895,0.00018346553,0.00012975952,0.0001338355,0.000010181934,0.000005288412,0.000023994215,0.0000058277146,0.004618162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863917,0.0006807292,0.0000211628,0.00008394688,0.000082153485,0.0004928386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999017,0.0004056324,0.000104051454,0.00007956649,0.00015373819,0.00023994074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009233068,0.00019947372,0.00037210007,0.0008713523,0.0034291965,0.0062736142,0.0012144245,0.0019313368,0.006877863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022246821,0.00024193508,0.00044820792,0.0013973988,0.0044156457,0.0012095678,0.0033818556,0.0011298228,0.00042557006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011579887,0.0003097876,0.07291555,0.0002760442,0.0001233901,0.005008612,0.017661171,0.021499258,0.00071520166,0.83775395,0.015550439,0.027028568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006028256,0.00035395427,0.22890304,0.00080578326,0.00031830696,0.002163582,0.16462803,0.05252111,0.00086062995,0.23054041,0.31806105,0.00024122075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20939577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2962551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20939577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014792265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002517187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41635388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337382490","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.007","title":"Ecological monetary economics: A post-Keynesian critique","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Nexus (standard); Post-Keynesian economics; Monetary policy; Interest rate; Keynesian economics; Endogenous money; Debt; Monetary economics; Ecological economics; New Keynesian economics; Monetarism; Macroeconomics; Ecology; Sustainability","score_opus":0.022385945911172343,"score_gpt":0.21870390783061758,"score_spread":0.19631796191944523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337382490","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06743655,0.061410647,0.13512805,0.47319633,0.005130037,0.000038892147,0.00047698375,0.000110594425,0.25707188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91782546,0.027204111,0.010281892,0.013634198,0.008851086,0.000067032444,0.000080944665,0.00008361311,0.021971611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999328,0.00026182478,0.000037831145,0.00013198677,0.00019666909,0.00004360497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970138,0.0020909265,0.0002433027,0.0002431431,0.00033318455,0.00007569105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028720254,0.00050259655,0.00069581874,0.0013481465,0.0008881036,0.0031481558,0.000927499,0.003510027,0.0055649066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008358758,0.0002606619,0.00049382617,0.0013245714,0.006100502,0.007406869,0.0014056226,0.0049540326,0.0006019074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011388756,0.0000067227575,0.000116831696,0.000028026745,0.000007865502,0.000020917187,0.000042241463,0.000892173,0.000029169121,0.99247074,0.0019874084,0.0043863975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063569946,0.0000027126591,0.00012529644,0.00002055722,0.0000031640031,0.000016758357,0.000016849364,0.0007969478,0.000036334215,0.9928739,0.0060988483,0.0000022048587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012110757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010338529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055649066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021855598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018616438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345203033","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.013","title":"Casting a long shadow: Demand-based accounting of Canada's greenhouse gas emissions responsibility","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Kyoto Protocol; Natural resource economics; Commit; Fossil fuel; Economics; Final demand; Production (economics); Shadow price; Agricultural economics; Carbon accounting; Environmental science; Engineering; Waste management; Ecology","score_opus":0.010086821107095011,"score_gpt":0.21271086566185515,"score_spread":0.20262404455476013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345203033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49551904,0.018268324,0.07476342,0.13558967,0.0015949142,0.0003078987,0.017445978,0.0011442786,0.25536647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98499423,0.0015472651,0.002881306,0.0006772933,0.00011206412,0.000013615602,0.00047113985,0.00007564018,0.009227519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973693,0.00054861844,0.00007757612,0.00021843812,0.0012565644,0.00052951864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924469,0.0024755367,0.0005922913,0.00039350864,0.0034883074,0.0006034481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032113148,0.0005855882,0.000633551,0.0016462745,0.0022546859,0.0070285457,0.001601231,0.0016406476,0.00432361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01658606,0.00045251468,0.0004740556,0.0036739383,0.001511612,0.004301916,0.0010717518,0.0025852087,0.00019594746],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003312536,0.00014397134,0.046817478,0.00033337588,0.00031740233,0.00034624204,0.0015357088,0.2884514,0.000941851,0.45309514,0.10971293,0.097973324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061701394,0.00004950561,0.051706873,0.0003803414,0.00026927967,0.00008614455,0.0035166391,0.51229495,0.002095133,0.2951203,0.1341088,0.00031035722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9609644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06981415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06981415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07933646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50653946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346698748","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.021","title":"The rise and fall of the sand monopoly in colonial Hong Kong","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"New York Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Colonialism; Business; Economic history; Economy; Political science; Economics; Ancient history; Law; Geography; History; Market economy","score_opus":0.014770770532777231,"score_gpt":0.24792247874218148,"score_spread":0.23315170820940426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346698748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99636877,0.0001502291,0.00001386835,0.00050470897,0.0000043497307,0.0000022949707,0.000024290064,6.7056783e-7,0.00293076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978083,0.00012283624,0.000009241209,0.000044635974,0.0000023532937,0.000001172193,0.000008646562,6.245439e-7,0.0020022234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997229,0.000034041106,0.000012685756,0.000020611407,0.000021923117,0.0001879236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900156,0.00017873917,0.00025613976,0.00004861645,0.00018447294,0.00033051838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005687201,0.00009015375,0.00023345281,0.00076389266,0.0022242577,0.0023869607,0.00034996468,0.0004353599,0.002567515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011410199,0.00023357861,0.00015852749,0.0012979042,0.003162593,0.0008816074,0.0012223491,0.0008816124,0.000112253474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067990244,0.00017815262,0.8018575,0.00015984094,0.000107077925,0.0041320072,0.07461993,0.0019594873,0.002821008,0.072601035,0.0049331225,0.035950985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001592039,0.000057056128,0.9304176,0.00005600344,0.000023514722,0.00012532213,0.05380036,0.00095197087,0.0003711458,0.0013159328,0.012841916,0.00002326587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58823943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7240107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58823943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014283095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055208676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82837105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470069394","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.019","title":"Building the consensus: The moral space of earth measurement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"Government of Canada; World Bank Group","keywords":"Earth system science; Ecosystem services; Space (punctuation); Completeness (order theory); Natural capital; Work (physics); Earth observation; Chart; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Economics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.05311561467278637,"score_gpt":0.2186365337682007,"score_spread":0.16552091909541433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470069394","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05309407,0.0063483864,0.2508413,0.40630937,0.0026925954,0.00010022033,0.00016478823,0.00017508709,0.28027418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964393,0.00071329356,0.022248326,0.006288376,0.0008812209,0.00014508792,0.000057931124,0.00013313787,0.005139594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9279858,0.058454305,0.001458333,0.0035956078,0.0063005695,0.0022053113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9306551,0.047524333,0.002440844,0.00824764,0.008059923,0.0030722204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053824812,0.00074998976,0.0015610995,0.003157416,0.010785616,0.016140714,0.0032281561,0.011776173,0.007860692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10237035,0.0006862228,0.0010182855,0.0024690374,0.06960537,0.026296658,0.013813197,0.013634193,0.00092948595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011119371,0.0000072891194,0.00008511565,0.000014382758,0.0000069509756,0.00001666346,0.0011330029,0.00026786572,0.000026164826,0.9936748,0.0015147822,0.0032416761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005353405,0.0000023237271,0.0000361745,0.000015378459,0.0000018999308,0.0000053018753,0.00041119702,0.0003116583,0.000027597931,0.996521,0.0026580885,0.0000038996172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003585808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023788093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053824812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007177738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009517229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28465623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483300814","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.002","title":"Forest conservation policy and motivational crowding: Experimental evidence from Tanzania","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; Agricultural and Applied Economics Association","keywords":"Crowding out; Incentive; Crowding; Payment; Economics; Stylized fact; Dictator game; Ecosystem services; Animal ecology; Public economics; Tanzania; Sample (material); Natural resource economics; Business; Socioeconomics; Ecosystem; Microeconomics; Ecology; Psychology; Monetary economics; Finance; Biology","score_opus":0.07841829704190881,"score_gpt":0.3416995561109292,"score_spread":0.26328125906902045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483300814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987772,0.000055637458,0.00009284648,0.000108477856,0.000002772529,0.0000090244675,0.000024807478,0.0000017679997,0.0009274511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932325,0.0000587335,0.00018217092,0.00004743053,0.0000033177291,0.000019526808,0.000019658479,0.0000012284522,0.00034476892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996661,0.0002102238,0.0000130435665,0.000032659224,0.000023792065,0.000054182383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99254954,0.004846934,0.0015266959,0.00059777434,0.00016288296,0.00031605663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017073383,0.00032430966,0.00028396593,0.00035168967,0.00090044487,0.00057653285,0.00035073725,0.00057296833,0.008158764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055451375,0.00019507244,0.00016024575,0.0003112348,0.0013239698,0.0003541246,0.00050889666,0.00051625527,0.00028371802],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023681471,0.038688622,0.7022706,0.001247066,0.0007925219,0.001498042,0.013851533,0.011076936,0.05779829,0.030367179,0.007326405,0.11140128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017634658,0.0057499195,0.95935655,0.0002219646,0.00038782263,0.00021570991,0.0074473736,0.0076139555,0.0037880354,0.009989409,0.0034015137,0.00006423093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010226473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020457463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010226473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060971396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005441775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027293801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565587026","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.11.018","title":"Robust Surveillance and Control of Invasive Species Using a Scenario Optimization Approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Invasive species; Propagule pressure; Quarantine; Control (management); Host (biology); PEST analysis; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Biological dispersal; Biology; Population","score_opus":0.024093692381118206,"score_gpt":0.17879759012636834,"score_spread":0.15470389774525012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565587026","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09730943,0.00036668702,0.89572376,0.0009391145,0.000049427512,0.00016936731,0.00030813707,0.0002788286,0.0048552295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630131,0.00011953532,0.03447863,0.00010003422,0.000041468942,0.0001693317,0.00018741218,0.00003468278,0.0018557595],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838185,0.00091537175,0.000055905683,0.00026759083,0.0001501183,0.00022921545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99316424,0.0052201184,0.0008132795,0.00019863897,0.00036471867,0.00023899727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035428638,0.001609944,0.0017812295,0.001536196,0.0004745097,0.0014462308,0.0017399116,0.0020061675,0.0027127373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008626457,0.0011591343,0.0012449482,0.00074978295,0.0011967836,0.0020950902,0.0018153337,0.001258836,0.0001737806],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046138106,0.000017094919,0.0002100291,0.000012382166,0.000043836928,0.000024021478,0.000008271444,0.9941883,0.00016177451,0.0031894431,0.00013531728,0.0019633602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005568445,0.00001223354,0.00006461016,0.0000015150836,0.000005240333,0.0000046972873,0.0000030701708,0.99822944,0.000038095284,0.0016060226,0.000027000258,0.0000025147178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072710337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040093446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072710337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018919791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014951171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01873672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594012331","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.027","title":"Exploring Citizen Support for Different Types of Climate Policy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":259,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions","keywords":"Respondent; Climate change; Public economics; Climate policy; Opposition (politics); Turnover; Sample (material); Political science; Survey data collection; Public policy; Business; Environmental resource management; Politics; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.7367389942336753,"score_gpt":0.4722084882722747,"score_spread":0.2645305059614006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594012331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9357298,0.00007667488,0.0012384676,0.0055778124,0.0000218666,0.000021294303,0.00005871684,0.000010721641,0.0572647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895847,0.000029331111,0.00016493774,0.00013733935,0.0000053744893,0.000011865633,0.000018750869,0.000004046074,0.00066999794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962134,0.0022935595,0.00008328048,0.00025953483,0.00048874406,0.0006615932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97262144,0.021685056,0.002301641,0.0010241698,0.0012818886,0.0010857952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052328836,0.0002083657,0.00027451458,0.001007223,0.002519615,0.0071722222,0.0008565481,0.0034470751,0.012217094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033698693,0.00024327854,0.00035960978,0.0015474955,0.0027206282,0.0052150073,0.003181579,0.002324781,0.00041779326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017043913,0.002437547,0.3471644,0.00041772763,0.00025121032,0.0012156812,0.24804756,0.0039472017,0.0029560148,0.28545386,0.007249596,0.099154934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022399997,0.0003395867,0.21791355,0.0002955352,0.0001768975,0.0002257692,0.5415205,0.0147770075,0.001423046,0.18756828,0.03544578,0.000089994894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010804664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013008889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012217094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028226112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029833934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04087031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598783559","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.023","title":"Managing Forests for Carbon and Timber: A Markov Decision Model of Uneven-aged Forest Management With Risk","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Natural resource economics; Forest management; Carbon fibers; Monoculture; Carbon price; Business; Environmental science; Economics; Ecology; Climate change; Agroforestry; Carbon dioxide; Computer science","score_opus":0.012748093202526884,"score_gpt":0.2246936980995771,"score_spread":0.21194560489705022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598783559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5958183,0.0013505043,0.3677879,0.008304065,0.0003107425,0.00028029038,0.003085876,0.00045731178,0.022605103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742921,0.00052011764,0.010890848,0.0002850321,0.000118464,0.00018901503,0.00053647236,0.00005558982,0.0131123755],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979201,0.00083601597,0.000075761374,0.00038026646,0.00015595742,0.00063189265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919024,0.005692494,0.0007456406,0.00018608777,0.00038521414,0.0010881429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00458493,0.0016312375,0.0034024992,0.0017131135,0.0014032418,0.0044631585,0.0040825075,0.005883553,0.010731699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009195193,0.0024916516,0.0021630134,0.0016723466,0.0034933514,0.0044399155,0.0023774847,0.0038298285,0.00085448724],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011540153,0.00005842997,0.00097226695,0.00001925229,0.000036853322,0.00008306791,0.000043382144,0.9819395,0.00011472601,0.015450741,0.00034155225,0.0008248336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040290488,0.000022986713,0.00028460464,0.000008319077,0.000021301852,0.00001643457,0.000022451977,0.99181235,0.00002523323,0.007612833,0.000115247916,0.000017957229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06579319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040277425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06579319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055678757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043033375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13082045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611572468","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.020","title":"Good for the Economy? An Ecological Economics Approach to Analyzing Alberta’s Bitumen Industry","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Asphalt; Process (computing); Economics; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental economics; Natural resource economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03421435940711139,"score_gpt":0.23187915322005373,"score_spread":0.19766479381294233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611572468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6712265,0.0046268417,0.035086323,0.023074133,0.00011018893,0.00013126254,0.0004367822,0.000058630776,0.2652494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783376,0.001090312,0.0030255266,0.00030413232,0.000029451705,0.000014579735,0.00005388859,0.000010827178,0.017133618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996798,0.000085253734,0.0000051029597,0.000020748294,0.00008136364,0.0001276838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959093,0.00017756574,0.00003302332,0.000016571837,0.00008646762,0.00009547407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005796683,0.00035228208,0.00036726415,0.002261596,0.002125491,0.00498457,0.0011312218,0.0014213712,0.004919368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011328063,0.00020454571,0.00046962406,0.0018717207,0.0029564113,0.0021149262,0.0008705599,0.0013152681,0.00009467923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054344415,0.00017607724,0.013738462,0.000071737086,0.00008949264,0.0004485061,0.00055114896,0.1197898,0.00075342215,0.83792263,0.005275234,0.021129139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030012792,0.000072582254,0.02665348,0.00015094281,0.00013147174,0.000101630394,0.009463384,0.1999925,0.0006447536,0.7280307,0.03466384,0.00006475855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55350626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8151453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44649374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020090621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016160361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89824647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611893769","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.027","title":"The Impact on Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Geographic Shifts in Global Supply Chains","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Latin Americans; China; Natural resource economics; Climate change; Global warming; East Asia; Developing country; Geography; Supply chain; Environmental science; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.010587453913822499,"score_gpt":0.2686541456090285,"score_spread":0.258066691695206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611893769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752706,0.0007919473,0.002334699,0.001980924,0.000040648378,0.000010423729,0.0003777,0.000010521064,0.019182544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982315,0.0004065571,0.00013790838,0.00004595344,0.000012512907,0.0000018823165,0.000057538517,0.0000035440862,0.0011028042],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995353,0.00020167706,0.00001754079,0.0000549872,0.000082489685,0.00010801534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976421,0.0012838711,0.00041453255,0.00012555704,0.00036041462,0.00017344231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008527783,0.0002205988,0.00018413627,0.0006095954,0.00040905224,0.0018733632,0.00034995753,0.00090253353,0.008438498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049974,0.00021308272,0.00040574104,0.0015765452,0.0010953597,0.0032866378,0.0011641341,0.0006564238,0.0004155417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001889358,0.00032163746,0.3543291,0.00041402626,0.00057808124,0.0016835353,0.0016794582,0.39485386,0.008867244,0.13874497,0.0049012667,0.09173743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015503287,0.0005529051,0.49410254,0.00020685847,0.0007170681,0.0005270074,0.027012749,0.15981516,0.0051648924,0.27949145,0.03211783,0.00013655674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018759534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030198475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018759534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017526429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065750134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037300706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738006973","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.007","title":"Unpacking the Relationships Between Pro-environmental Behavior, Life Satisfaction, and Perceived Ecological Threat","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":253,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Life satisfaction; Unpacking; Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.04457386597033414,"score_gpt":0.2662079032669694,"score_spread":0.22163403729663528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738006973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972051,0.00019657161,0.00042845585,0.00027116045,0.000010901462,0.000006303875,0.00007318452,0.000002881567,0.0018053381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933904,0.00007109598,0.00022323125,0.000041162428,0.00000967104,0.0000050872386,0.00007375897,0.0000015020247,0.0002353948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910444,0.00047978273,0.000053751028,0.000113889284,0.00012888547,0.000119281445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99046654,0.0059589525,0.0015073821,0.0005357327,0.00048395953,0.0010473784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023812514,0.0004343944,0.0003428279,0.0010346451,0.0005840019,0.0020135639,0.00047223057,0.0009204131,0.0040300884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068437746,0.00034524876,0.0006891602,0.0010205315,0.00104468,0.0014480051,0.001142653,0.0016514033,0.00025641438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007652843,0.00032869406,0.99227834,0.000019110515,0.00020675588,0.00003195057,0.00047696213,0.00022775008,0.00033185293,0.00082686887,0.00006829219,0.0051270314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041697804,0.00010477554,0.9964876,0.000010671644,0.00008066685,0.000034177378,0.00104455,0.0011524096,0.00007991393,0.0007808004,0.00021336818,0.000006964167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072890804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016717883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072890804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035077016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088200986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014493287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738391891","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.022","title":"Is Environmental Income Reporting Evasive in Household Surveys? Evidence From Rural Poor in Laos","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Probit model; Household income; Economics; Work (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Poverty trap; Ordered probit; Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Geography; Economic growth; Econometrics","score_opus":0.1315553523662712,"score_gpt":0.3386442867091382,"score_spread":0.20708893434286701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738391891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98272645,0.0022959926,0.00043782356,0.005745965,0.00004477192,0.00004328383,0.00084863754,0.000005819082,0.007851287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722445,0.0010664759,0.0001748378,0.0008776737,0.00004485122,0.000027041717,0.00023007081,0.0000030971844,0.00035156668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97269213,0.021866575,0.0012116411,0.00086346717,0.0017071316,0.001659146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81027627,0.11010478,0.055947963,0.006690946,0.01456024,0.002419798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03207234,0.00031000047,0.000539022,0.0019626317,0.0012726518,0.002366672,0.0014911523,0.0011585845,0.0027456929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095664725,0.0004821258,0.00051498704,0.0048247944,0.003206733,0.0021048528,0.0022628317,0.001409365,0.00024653683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002917095,0.00013178981,0.98347855,0.00026292403,0.00026639216,0.00009784854,0.0037319483,0.00008563322,0.000057152763,0.0007049934,0.0011944802,0.009696504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007335247,0.00026810478,0.9658126,0.0009395484,0.0005956389,0.00014804838,0.024605492,0.00043915806,0.00031275375,0.0011126207,0.0056638415,0.000028811637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07389715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09670669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07389715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010738577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019492881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16961676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738831689","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.030","title":"Bird Killer, Industrial Intruder or Clean Energy? Perceiving Risks to Ecosystem Services Due to an Offshore Wind Farm","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment","keywords":"Risk perception; Ecosystem services; Opposition (politics); Environmental resource management; Business; Harm; Wind power; Natural resource economics; Offshore wind power; Ambiguity; Environmental planning; Environmental economics; Perception; Engineering; Geography; Ecosystem; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Politics; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07812844445200855,"score_gpt":0.3251046920846283,"score_spread":0.24697624763261972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738831689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968964,0.000035601235,0.00013988931,0.0003655471,0.000008468324,0.0000024836643,0.0000057473376,8.656237e-7,0.0025450299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957734,0.000037087597,0.00008365123,0.000065639695,0.0000052116297,0.0000015370576,0.000006513482,6.364754e-7,0.00022240466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997296,0.000111945265,0.000010426821,0.00002407579,0.000065327804,0.000058659905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753225,0.00076085527,0.0010545321,0.00006030498,0.0001704682,0.0004214769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008042227,0.00019618263,0.00014978912,0.0003134643,0.0005160393,0.0017873181,0.00019278016,0.0013796417,0.0017509685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031960069,0.00014547407,0.00020641717,0.00011448534,0.0010700359,0.0009692208,0.0006821622,0.0011471119,0.000110758105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071242254,0.0005704546,0.912335,0.00009311012,0.00017471873,0.0019835674,0.051446218,0.0018558087,0.010459745,0.0044275397,0.001116258,0.014825159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025092353,0.00045810177,0.86782193,0.000045638495,0.00007189475,0.0004977513,0.123023465,0.003287801,0.00048538094,0.0025805605,0.0016568325,0.000045630706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005065746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0118387425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005065746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005026471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022501714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010072529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762440865","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.09.003","title":"Integrating Watershed Hydrology and Economics to Establish a Local Market for Water Quality Improvement: A Field Experiment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; University of Rhode Island; University of Connecticut; U.S. Geological Survey; Hatch; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Environmental economics; Watershed; Water quality; Water supply; Supply and demand; Ecosystem services; Business; Environmental resource management; Economics; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Microeconomics; Environmental engineering; Computer science; Ecosystem; Ecology","score_opus":0.07926678737599382,"score_gpt":0.37568859949699407,"score_spread":0.29642181212100027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762440865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966378,0.000009230502,0.0015094004,0.000096333126,0.00001453478,0.000639089,0.00006567701,0.000032626,0.000995386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835534,0.00003678566,0.0109890485,0.0002084437,0.000023928256,0.0019532964,0.00019615154,0.000031947016,0.0030071007],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978781,0.0008584007,0.000111331196,0.00051260286,0.00039646172,0.00024312563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874117,0.0068988795,0.0010286114,0.0018764503,0.0007277904,0.0020565856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006940179,0.00091008644,0.0015147417,0.00075539696,0.0019768218,0.0021684025,0.002387198,0.003143613,0.0070985053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008536417,0.00072778016,0.0008314034,0.0008930154,0.0028474568,0.002601758,0.0017978417,0.0027389342,0.0006590428],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07959098,0.60361254,0.044265877,0.001140178,0.0010047302,0.0010594986,0.004226791,0.04239881,0.13926786,0.018143374,0.0036523312,0.06163703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07664003,0.4397983,0.079387754,0.0001974269,0.0019769084,0.0004183128,0.006007283,0.27766266,0.07647714,0.03014056,0.010715428,0.00057817576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069246558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009252478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070985053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018886288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039794757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036703646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765221637","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.023","title":"Silencing Agency in Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) by Essentializing a Neoliberal ‘Monster’ Into Being: A Response to Fletcher &amp; Büscher's ‘PES Conceit’","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation; Genome Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Governmentality; Neoliberalism (international relations); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Critical theory; Praxis; Capitalism; Politics; Hegemony; Epistemology; Situational ethics; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01644320006015287,"score_gpt":0.24490355444995776,"score_spread":0.2284603543898049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765221637","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008444234,0.0013415475,0.0021555992,0.9361802,0.0021597054,0.000013778991,0.000016909684,0.000045937326,0.049642134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25767472,0.00087399245,0.002154427,0.7023321,0.002670809,0.00011541537,0.000021596252,0.00013876737,0.034018278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.987498,0.00592653,0.0004313252,0.0016505594,0.0025282449,0.0019653551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97855127,0.014020988,0.0015271623,0.0016218078,0.0018343783,0.002444421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016220447,0.0005612284,0.0005577897,0.0006850146,0.00927545,0.015242143,0.0025652642,0.031830117,0.0059790006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03434099,0.0004535643,0.0007111243,0.0012881027,0.052516114,0.016689954,0.011847827,0.033443227,0.00086311094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019667104,0.000024275212,0.0003103913,0.000026797585,0.0000068449185,0.000057405996,0.007686146,0.00011955379,0.00019873872,0.894594,0.09029492,0.006661238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045664186,0.000022238482,0.001222979,0.0002220087,0.000012770997,0.00008188774,0.008768995,0.0005518834,0.0004531306,0.37674055,0.6118125,0.00006551318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020420287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04801268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031830117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008881796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0155421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085782945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770776418","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.025","title":"Certified Organic Agriculture as an Alternative Livelihood Strategy for Small-scale Farmers in China: A Case Study in Wanzai County, Jiangxi Province","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Institut Alam Sekitar dan Pembangunan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia; China Agricultural University; Department for International Development, UK Government; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Livelihood; Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Business; Organic farming; Context (archaeology); Household income; Scale (ratio); Net income; Poverty; Agricultural science; Geography; Economics; Economic growth; Environmental science","score_opus":0.031829614094282435,"score_gpt":0.24618119564092167,"score_spread":0.21435158154663925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770776418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99862075,0.000030544576,0.0000771474,0.00014638105,0.0000019047985,0.000022501332,0.000009108456,0.0000016359992,0.0010899154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880207,0.000051144263,0.00013393504,0.000021065423,0.0000013015742,0.000007863538,0.000011183677,6.539716e-7,0.0009707238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995233,0.000115167786,0.00001062293,0.000039907874,0.000053458287,0.00025755737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946195,0.0001186528,0.000073903946,0.000022103583,0.000072214956,0.00025128096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060924946,0.0003028137,0.00018702421,0.000632506,0.0039004453,0.0011493394,0.0011985279,0.0010188551,0.002307339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065070734,0.00017529221,0.00021785287,0.0009930605,0.0017579844,0.0006508296,0.0010984421,0.0004218879,0.00009134902],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054592505,0.002878339,0.74681735,0.0002968245,0.00013545713,0.099545315,0.055280898,0.008480095,0.012114674,0.016756445,0.0037370448,0.053411756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016572351,0.001291111,0.51968056,0.00017645585,0.00015155046,0.004754225,0.43367124,0.020790292,0.0019750295,0.0023774765,0.014883626,0.00008275092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16700147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40118277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16700147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006045459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007684829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33205885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771697361","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.019","title":"Visualisations in Choice Experiments: Comparing 3D Film-sequences and Still-images to Analyse Housing Development Alternatives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Set (abstract data type); Comprehension; Choice set; Citizen journalism; Computer science; Task (project management); Marketing; Management science; Economics; Business; Econometrics; World Wide Web; Management","score_opus":0.2368130272734687,"score_gpt":0.32031809695956814,"score_spread":0.08350506968609944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771697361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9228397,0.0013429867,0.06456787,0.0005059691,0.00016990978,0.0005089361,0.0025331215,0.00051241874,0.0070191203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9502593,0.00049896276,0.046566032,0.00008283503,0.00006205921,0.00037503344,0.00091181515,0.00014480742,0.0010991355],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983114,0.0012258331,0.00005991875,0.00011019064,0.00022028893,0.00007243348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727586,0.024226388,0.0010276688,0.0008031692,0.00073154055,0.00045266445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024750754,0.00060992927,0.00055091584,0.0019366494,0.0003455886,0.002016074,0.000770982,0.0012749966,0.011521435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023670387,0.00041815423,0.0008103028,0.00119675,0.0010706639,0.0019135772,0.0013412557,0.00078681676,0.00062697293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03257456,0.0055197636,0.078669325,0.010028169,0.0014752332,0.002016769,0.031120794,0.16188249,0.18138058,0.03273242,0.014338666,0.44826117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022411828,0.005612102,0.26551104,0.0016738191,0.0007675868,0.0011406804,0.01302918,0.5615923,0.044586677,0.079720534,0.023371853,0.00075307925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030641435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033606582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011521435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006947714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030759818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038543046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781747296","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.026","title":"Wetlands, Flood Control and Ecosystem Services in the Smith Creek Drainage Basin: A Case Study in Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Wetland; Ecosystem services; Flood control; Flood myth; Environmental science; Damages; Flood mitigation; Detention basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecosystem; Structural basin; Drainage basin; Flooding (psychology); Environmental resource management; Water resource management; Geography; Ecology; Surface runoff; Engineering","score_opus":0.006384755467326371,"score_gpt":0.18675968952769517,"score_spread":0.1803749340603688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781747296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99735945,0.00015162412,0.000056619978,0.00024440628,0.000002536377,0.000029321105,0.00029467026,0.0000030633553,0.0018583746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790937,0.0002552638,0.00020826796,0.00007174138,0.0000014289167,0.000013644829,0.00015556757,0.0000033249364,0.0013814094],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927944,0.00014651127,0.000032613145,0.00006471489,0.00012581145,0.00035089863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987368,0.00034934346,0.00014008918,0.000047109042,0.0004115754,0.00031509722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057996815,0.00039354313,0.0004506892,0.0014994679,0.004971679,0.002058873,0.0015991057,0.00093836675,0.0016545967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017075383,0.00041380397,0.0005076153,0.004900504,0.0026603586,0.00076086127,0.0015417755,0.00081673183,0.00012006409],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002242382,0.0003796261,0.9544196,0.00013052473,0.0002252361,0.0049201907,0.010384341,0.0042372188,0.0012778402,0.003167196,0.002656949,0.017976906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004705399,0.000076874974,0.92524177,0.000113316695,0.00012009515,0.000620344,0.06523076,0.0043952307,0.00037979713,0.00082942634,0.002876132,0.000069270034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05427879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05427879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052660998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.393822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801058835","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.004","title":"The Energy-emissions Trap","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Renewable energy; Dispatchable generation; Natural resource economics; Fossil fuel; Economics; Investment (military); Environmental science; Environmental economics; Ecology; Engineering; Waste management; Distributed generation","score_opus":0.020920776826505127,"score_gpt":0.26753961989728264,"score_spread":0.24661884307077753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801058835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018947914,0.02478104,0.018458158,0.37899864,0.0028560366,0.000020262889,0.00032238313,0.00011493181,0.5555006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7887512,0.014523431,0.0053186193,0.08242519,0.004723905,0.0001200221,0.00016370272,0.0002349056,0.103739016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983536,0.00059709855,0.000036573194,0.0002908486,0.0005248317,0.00019708667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656135,0.0023871323,0.0001594094,0.00033023342,0.00032827564,0.00023357838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00319522,0.00052075647,0.0007998137,0.0012054737,0.0025659306,0.004611058,0.0008073474,0.005515571,0.016577546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008656568,0.00024307451,0.00041780833,0.0010668102,0.009504616,0.013910658,0.0037544488,0.009147234,0.0017255208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011871321,0.0000090778185,0.00007857767,0.000015210173,0.0000038526537,0.000020345464,0.00006348927,0.00012468005,0.000038982704,0.9875129,0.008028031,0.004092988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068887402,0.0000044889457,0.000117703974,0.00004440549,0.000002131699,0.000029570167,0.00013840297,0.0002726867,0.000077805584,0.95631087,0.04299029,0.000004832489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001706308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002221421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016577546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020718302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020965762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055457413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801810193","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.009","title":"Technological Change and Energy Efficiency in Large Chinese Firms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy Efficiency and Management","field":"Energy","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Tsinghua University; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Tsinghua Initiative Scientific Research Program; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Technological change; Embodied energy; Efficient energy use; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Energy consumption; China; Business; Investment (military); Energy (signal processing); Industrial organization; Production (economics); Profit (economics); Commerce; Market economy; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.01647394644225012,"score_gpt":0.2250913851943549,"score_spread":0.20861743875210478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801810193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99850744,0.00020542037,0.000039620532,0.00013023187,0.0000014119815,0.000003943794,0.000021902813,0.0000013553018,0.0010887104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995894,0.00009150204,0.000010499012,0.000010539572,0.0000022535198,0.0000016378438,0.000026778354,3.3260727e-7,0.00026709223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995407,0.000068808484,0.00003016942,0.00006971625,0.00008032828,0.0002103047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690115,0.0014855948,0.0006759756,0.00013841141,0.00034757023,0.00045126688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096140336,0.00023178806,0.00031671912,0.001970902,0.0014096133,0.0018598577,0.00044561326,0.0007230761,0.0018276976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026657928,0.00027930012,0.0005045492,0.0033818316,0.001459449,0.0012862558,0.0010542922,0.000549254,0.00011304407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020738954,0.000282996,0.9756579,0.000057689547,0.00012821807,0.00080335245,0.00281877,0.0054437695,0.0009355927,0.006374589,0.00032313488,0.0069665466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013718692,0.000046456054,0.99240476,0.0000112031075,0.000059888163,0.00003620462,0.003041514,0.0028846376,0.0002537836,0.0006965671,0.000537743,0.000013618191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22390562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2954138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22390562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008378238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003886479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44520468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809602916","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.06.006","title":"Looking for Medium-term Conservation and Development Impacts of Community Management Agreements in Uganda's Rwenzori Mountains National Park","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Social Science Research Council; Wildlife Conservation Society; Centre for International Forestry Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Livelihood; National park; Quartile; Geography; Baseline (sea); Welfare; Socioeconomics; Household income; Business; Agricultural economics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Fishery; Agriculture","score_opus":0.0327809303611204,"score_gpt":0.24318710339735855,"score_spread":0.21040617303623815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809602916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99468935,0.00026429544,0.00004599933,0.0008460363,0.0000075688304,0.000010434114,0.00007800513,0.0000010800965,0.004057147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989837,0.00011897711,0.000053427586,0.00006191559,0.000003137315,0.000012746152,0.000038828533,7.889973e-7,0.0007264018],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998912,0.00033135092,0.00003997067,0.00005925116,0.000094977004,0.0005623358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617,0.0010458918,0.0009713991,0.000069847076,0.0005629371,0.0011800028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013230193,0.00015508244,0.00021440741,0.0011093635,0.0027379442,0.0028127132,0.0007953959,0.0009017048,0.005774787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050249677,0.00020569788,0.00025678574,0.0014468163,0.0012297988,0.002800963,0.0031310038,0.0019053892,0.00016383608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066321925,0.0008571697,0.9142835,0.0002694097,0.00020325469,0.0026441854,0.013198586,0.0031058427,0.0007469336,0.016607828,0.003152401,0.044267714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017929837,0.00027891848,0.9141842,0.00020982153,0.00011077061,0.0002503719,0.07517363,0.0012920413,0.00023377078,0.0025165451,0.0057077655,0.000024212886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046905477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16955645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046905477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004447915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002653563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09326494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810013445","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.06.012","title":"A Quantitative Approach for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Corporations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainability; Probabilistic logic; Focus (optics); Sustainability organizations; Measure (data warehouse); Environmental economics; Computer science; Economics; Business; Environmental resource management; Management science; Econometrics; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Ecology","score_opus":0.030976905350305704,"score_gpt":0.2689050920034535,"score_spread":0.23792818665314783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810013445","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23924308,0.001715906,0.62829113,0.0032578125,0.00020778805,0.00056610996,0.003133647,0.00034589178,0.123238616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90366644,0.00038711482,0.090483114,0.0002122487,0.00009776126,0.00038215646,0.000522799,0.00003220032,0.0042161494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862861,0.0082136,0.0005703257,0.0005485889,0.0038789255,0.00050241564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802981,0.013259434,0.0018234426,0.0013344829,0.002626511,0.0006579106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011234582,0.0008765195,0.0006246337,0.008798179,0.00093211,0.0045833155,0.0011417299,0.0012240945,0.004112055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02735578,0.00031947668,0.00077871315,0.0063004703,0.0019338442,0.0037212488,0.002008679,0.0010966742,0.00035228996],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024855952,0.00087768823,0.086052485,0.00048343663,0.0006370221,0.00014347884,0.001779285,0.11485932,0.005561939,0.5885503,0.0060684555,0.19473802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057090383,0.0012734049,0.073191136,0.000543056,0.00029205825,0.00025340772,0.0052171974,0.30071047,0.007120921,0.58348966,0.0276789,0.00017272156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038881649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005003355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011234582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029925543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003051268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059414864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890166935","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.022","title":"Consumer Response to Climate Adaptation Strategies in the Food Sector: An Australian Scenario","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Department of Agriculture and Water, Australian Government; Australian Government","keywords":"Respondent; Product (mathematics); Purchasing; Business; Willingness to pay; Marketing; Adaptation (eye); Climate change; Wine; Economics; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.06506050376647593,"score_gpt":0.2623184322697494,"score_spread":0.19725792850327345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890166935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98209816,0.00010193006,0.00023429687,0.004463826,0.000018894603,0.000034702087,0.00030595544,0.000009027872,0.012733203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963276,0.0001550762,0.00019493492,0.0002566426,0.000005249573,0.00001576031,0.00009645699,0.0000026113423,0.002945825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993886,0.00022867873,0.000015314281,0.000042037853,0.00008766942,0.00023765178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993099,0.000100168356,0.000107985215,0.00003233608,0.00017967944,0.0002700453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008691077,0.0003265497,0.00029476345,0.000476361,0.0013438355,0.0013673115,0.000907095,0.0021803842,0.0030420693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016145149,0.0002412335,0.0006383455,0.0012115712,0.0010288924,0.0010618359,0.0017369186,0.0013011112,0.00021280273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004979145,0.004298821,0.50975287,0.0006990886,0.0006536553,0.023156222,0.027778098,0.13717774,0.020359555,0.1470902,0.04389303,0.08016159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020198406,0.0011281378,0.80858356,0.000090598594,0.0001624784,0.00085341587,0.032695364,0.10900569,0.0010476109,0.019482015,0.026548846,0.0002003205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3530221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39848325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3530221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007974456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002509837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7019346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896651838","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.008","title":"Food Security and Wildlife Management in Nunavut","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Government of Nova Scotia","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Wildlife; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Arctic; Wildlife management; Business; Geography; Environmental resource management; Food systems; Food insecurity; Natural resource economics; Environmental planning; Agriculture; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.03900931512143772,"score_gpt":0.3286851798621691,"score_spread":0.28967586474073137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896651838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99184656,0.0006852076,0.000030102548,0.002778229,0.000020804113,0.000008092092,0.00005786619,0.0000016102617,0.0045715785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943567,0.00046088835,0.00008054772,0.0003126178,0.000008931644,0.000009472913,0.000021791471,0.0000021590743,0.004746889],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999569,0.00012317405,0.000010995094,0.000027848606,0.000039018258,0.00023006894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908364,0.00019452572,0.00009631669,0.000017255279,0.00009660204,0.00051168364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005912075,0.0001111908,0.00012629946,0.00069098914,0.00504966,0.0014940603,0.0010059634,0.0006122666,0.004991076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013742448,0.00020502528,0.00012664704,0.00092833,0.0018771831,0.00060958666,0.0022537252,0.00088924414,0.00012582849],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015885278,0.00042072395,0.87662375,0.0001258243,0.000034159642,0.0016749222,0.060365207,0.00055703043,0.0009013744,0.021102948,0.0039787404,0.034056608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017766975,0.000062801235,0.77731043,0.00021472052,0.000024690607,0.00028144702,0.20725836,0.0006365897,0.00019436158,0.0020955228,0.011880645,0.000022764892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9187722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08122778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01365956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015918532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16341221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901686490","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.10.013","title":"Network Governance of Land-Sea Social-Ecological Systems in the Lesser Antilles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Corporate governance; Network governance; Collaborative governance; Business; Environmental resource management; Social network (sociolinguistics); Environmental planning; Geography; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.0196920836831123,"score_gpt":0.21422950209233113,"score_spread":0.19453741840921884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901686490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996024,0.00003331477,0.00033233708,0.00049763446,9.885582e-7,0.00000387134,0.00004761033,0.0000030654217,0.0030571893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943775,0.000022860591,0.0000666502,0.000009332006,0.0000010007241,0.0000022970244,0.0000168274,6.078016e-7,0.00044264927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978334,0.00009491238,0.000009100313,0.000034596556,0.000021107082,0.000057007608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987093,0.0004616047,0.0004545253,0.000073223935,0.0001489894,0.00015230733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046871463,0.00007010944,0.00013820018,0.0008160469,0.0008479599,0.001392496,0.00028550296,0.00029240584,0.0028004688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026960892,0.000116130555,0.000098949655,0.00083762815,0.0013895994,0.0010452913,0.0008833122,0.00019756649,0.00011886786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002996442,0.00013934496,0.7453502,0.00008616833,0.0001088844,0.00065738376,0.015390288,0.031759966,0.0032131744,0.17014667,0.0029610312,0.029887272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003296411,0.00005285908,0.903282,0.00004938392,0.000029775343,0.00015003736,0.016059821,0.042518146,0.00021613993,0.028258272,0.009329114,0.000021542617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11207151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22511616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11207151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003068258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007696039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22283834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910080003","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.013","title":"Alternative and Resistance Movements: The Two Faces of Sustainability Transformations?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Sustainability; Social movement; Resistance (ecology); Politics; Social sustainability; Movement (music); Environmental ethics; Environmental movement; Transformation (genetics); Sociology; Political science; Ecology; Aesthetics; Biology","score_opus":0.010319423814478224,"score_gpt":0.23106179145127412,"score_spread":0.2207423676367959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910080003","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081456445,0.0041960906,0.027312083,0.47969243,0.0010824038,0.000057500696,0.00012040926,0.00009575222,0.40598693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96706855,0.002194592,0.0031211814,0.011380341,0.00093831966,0.00008263322,0.000048920807,0.00006846798,0.015097113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919464,0.003968945,0.0001499808,0.0010088218,0.001263712,0.0016621823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917732,0.0035574946,0.0013742464,0.0011256618,0.00071957347,0.0014498279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008701857,0.00042173266,0.0006830449,0.0010983476,0.0033105072,0.0111569045,0.0020391732,0.007247453,0.023934526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01644557,0.00026087227,0.00051527866,0.0013346182,0.031834863,0.022573462,0.006087857,0.005927104,0.0011891996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018770821,0.00003594906,0.00041064867,0.000029643483,0.0000055256414,0.00004386579,0.001575846,0.00020004669,0.00011829484,0.97941935,0.005054173,0.013087779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021927963,0.00001781553,0.0011817127,0.000093298106,0.0000070960427,0.00009448461,0.007025412,0.00073014107,0.00011341213,0.9266526,0.06404498,0.000017163396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020643186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035153602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023934526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032139334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004089827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080068946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920111783","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.005","title":"Climate justice, commons, and degrowth","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Indigenous; Climate justice; Livelihood; Commodification; Environmental ethics; Grassroots; Sociology; Environmental justice; Degrowth; Solidarity; Politics; Injustice; Political ecology; Democracy; Corporate governance; Equity (law); Political economy; Climate governance; Economic Justice; Political science; Climate change; Economics; Law; Sustainability; Economy; Ecology","score_opus":0.010890081593139752,"score_gpt":0.1747180372230911,"score_spread":0.16382795562995134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920111783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19781321,0.00898737,0.0060257325,0.057587758,0.00056639186,0.000019158706,0.000096781856,0.000031390635,0.7288722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829555,0.0010149458,0.00032338515,0.0014633001,0.00015602238,0.00000667363,0.000007899951,0.0000151478625,0.014057055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988914,0.00045720645,0.00003558197,0.00014092252,0.00019028,0.0002845522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528235,0.0026488502,0.00054832635,0.00061235245,0.00034430853,0.0005638482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027867986,0.00015715744,0.00023489694,0.0010379336,0.004997924,0.0054955934,0.00049413176,0.001652716,0.012795216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074471002,0.00010554172,0.00018043185,0.0014793949,0.020121556,0.004491025,0.0025831268,0.0021038034,0.0004093723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030739022,0.00003913938,0.0025597708,0.000023099505,0.0000056268627,0.000045793757,0.0029832919,0.0002718237,0.00005882626,0.97925353,0.0043211933,0.010407202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072193975,0.000013370391,0.005137014,0.00007421738,0.000007940739,0.00007355594,0.008019855,0.00025586094,0.00015840124,0.92984337,0.056397077,0.000011938926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004691269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015666978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012795216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019938813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002051583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04280424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943386179","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.018","title":"From ecological macroeconomics to a theory of endogenous money for a finite planet","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Ecological economics; Macroeconomics; Endogeneity; Corporate governance; Neoclassical economics; Sustainability; Ecology; Finance","score_opus":0.027687458447322753,"score_gpt":0.2427588341434611,"score_spread":0.21507137569613835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943386179","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08219287,0.025876215,0.4228459,0.15937594,0.0026708564,0.000057965746,0.0008019755,0.00022489319,0.30595338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94138896,0.009797781,0.020026583,0.0028682398,0.0019353651,0.00011511916,0.0001215306,0.000099733516,0.023646608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992472,0.0004086215,0.000031342763,0.00008938197,0.00014673208,0.000076720724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99694985,0.002075822,0.00025192523,0.000256667,0.0002826686,0.00018310534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021124391,0.0005743026,0.0007585569,0.0015881382,0.0012729361,0.004635017,0.0012447853,0.002723112,0.008594078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071358327,0.00036008816,0.0007127662,0.0020225334,0.007508239,0.010823185,0.002163726,0.0035024998,0.0005638494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021742615,0.0000023034704,0.00004024255,0.000008128532,0.0000020003665,0.000006798246,0.00002090274,0.0011711954,0.000009818973,0.9977241,0.00046400065,0.0005483469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001795172,0.0000011024289,0.000024701032,0.0000062580566,0.0000010967997,0.0000040983878,0.000017653065,0.0011968396,0.0000073331535,0.9970594,0.0016782787,0.000001552191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037472127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024841889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008594078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004804244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021924556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034857333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964245833","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106355","title":"Tradable climate liabilities: A thought experiment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; HEC Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Harm; Liability; Debt; Climate change; Economics; Revenue; Decentralization; Business; Natural resource economics; Finance; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.062090829855669334,"score_gpt":0.23729456172001925,"score_spread":0.17520373186434993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964245833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73039895,0.0006573837,0.11529602,0.017037049,0.00091305247,0.0034539113,0.0010069194,0.000521617,0.13071503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696751,0.00013850136,0.022923926,0.0012659043,0.00010975698,0.0012355263,0.00007050466,0.00003686443,0.0045437524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99345523,0.004773319,0.00017140401,0.0006291464,0.00057032,0.0004005461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9477881,0.0427629,0.0027628301,0.0041289506,0.0011835695,0.0013736798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016502472,0.0008825366,0.0011296533,0.00045713398,0.0018742979,0.00452826,0.001962968,0.004184111,0.021933796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03324353,0.00046141932,0.0010766151,0.00055564835,0.0043824925,0.005587265,0.0023432628,0.0044616633,0.0010761614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007275494,0.006282659,0.0031706747,0.00049597333,0.00018424774,0.0004994676,0.0026568794,0.024744755,0.003514961,0.92921495,0.0060879793,0.015871814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01379922,0.0056606294,0.0017755899,0.00012511596,0.00022888857,0.00014934174,0.002089793,0.12459317,0.003047382,0.82595575,0.02241295,0.00016216705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016339413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009987287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021933796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022603977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021795295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08727443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965430492","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106418","title":"Who promotes sustainability? Five theses on the relationships between the degrowth and the environmental justice movements","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Degrowth; Materialism; Overconsumption; Reproduction; Prosperity; Capital accumulation; Sustainability; Economic Justice; Economics; Ecological economics; Economic system; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Neoclassical economics; Ecology; Biology; Economic growth; Profit (economics)","score_opus":0.03212482189813606,"score_gpt":0.26648662597992717,"score_spread":0.2343618040817911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965430492","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03265234,0.018458905,0.002731962,0.7255142,0.0025817996,0.00008752271,0.00017736244,0.000013742394,0.2177822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83261484,0.040752344,0.0038059764,0.09434336,0.0039623356,0.00028426325,0.00021760554,0.00004775876,0.02397146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559104,0.0023428441,0.00018077905,0.00032876674,0.0006921105,0.0008644223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603665,0.029093048,0.0035869128,0.001185352,0.002531685,0.0032365506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011736174,0.0005040541,0.0006124352,0.003119608,0.007905103,0.011876376,0.0018688259,0.006202641,0.025682613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028931431,0.00026790163,0.0006659558,0.004192745,0.02678062,0.015556612,0.008081092,0.010950573,0.0006397058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025262445,0.00007901418,0.0013269576,0.00010231642,0.0000089492405,0.0000428999,0.004585305,0.00008017578,0.00002595433,0.97060835,0.011333003,0.011781756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026708321,0.00003260509,0.00603773,0.0015232963,0.000035440626,0.000054325163,0.042268317,0.00032247658,0.00012237274,0.7753794,0.17415386,0.00004333675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017001638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044287786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025682613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006854504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0109109385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08591688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972991779","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106447","title":"Metabolic relationships between cities and hinterland: a political-industrial ecology of energy metabolism of Saint-Nazaire metropolitan and port area (France)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Urban metabolism; Metropolitan area; Port (circuit theory); Industrial ecology; Political ecology; Politics; Industrial symbiosis; Order (exchange); Material flow analysis; Economic geography; Regional science; Ecology; Sociology; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Business; Urban planning; Political science; Sustainability; Economics; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.020935635304845195,"score_gpt":0.20646368742069904,"score_spread":0.18552805211585385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972991779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99462885,0.00017240948,0.00013176136,0.00096261606,0.000003335128,0.000004955583,0.00022664592,0.0000049665173,0.0038645153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987477,0.000089482084,0.000083051586,0.00003315444,0.0000035854976,0.0000026531582,0.00009552472,0.0000022936701,0.00094250345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998047,0.00007948121,0.000004502423,0.000020737807,0.00001665089,0.00007385952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960834,0.00009198552,0.00011083758,0.000015773167,0.0000847606,0.00008841539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002819096,0.00015201376,0.000140726,0.0012738664,0.0008787199,0.0019947325,0.0004054269,0.00040961316,0.005161393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075712876,0.00013478234,0.00023679933,0.0020860725,0.0011970355,0.00068435556,0.0009631246,0.00032199293,0.00018893162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000439811,0.00016227261,0.92845595,0.000041806732,0.00012398153,0.00049560185,0.0046734423,0.0037638322,0.0018707598,0.041563783,0.0018459863,0.016562724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012090457,0.000017135531,0.98825294,0.000013446498,0.000012977378,0.000044081135,0.0056896927,0.0018933564,0.00009415389,0.0014291846,0.0025333625,0.000007648655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30799922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5065631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30799922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048222537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015576304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6124129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011627004","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106650","title":"Trading off visual disamenity for renewable energy: Willingness to pay for seaweed farming for energy production","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Innovate UK; Crown Estate; Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea; Queen's University; Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras; Eusko Jaurlaritza; Queen's University Belfast; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Newcastle University; Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science","keywords":"Renewable energy; Biogas; Production (economics); Status quo; Agricultural economics; Willingness to pay; Feed-in tariff; Business; Natural resource economics; Fishery; Agricultural science; Geography; Economics; Environmental science; Ecology; Energy policy; Biology","score_opus":0.024066967228749934,"score_gpt":0.22652293215110042,"score_spread":0.2024559649223505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011627004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90367925,0.00034883068,0.0054116137,0.0041959924,0.000052230353,0.00003518005,0.00013550726,0.000049254344,0.086092114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672806,0.000024820174,0.00028478392,0.00010543581,0.000009617573,0.0000040940968,0.000013750128,0.0000056520894,0.002823786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994105,0.00021358707,0.00003086471,0.00008502731,0.00009706368,0.00016294423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937297,0.0038798875,0.0008653286,0.00037575615,0.00033689584,0.0008124081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014773641,0.00035079004,0.00032889267,0.00045384932,0.00058449584,0.0037508835,0.0005756969,0.0031058856,0.026411807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007959965,0.00028313516,0.00054221414,0.00031600217,0.0011112569,0.0029215643,0.001209676,0.0014203766,0.0008406907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046191807,0.0031885663,0.3443094,0.0005745854,0.00070171815,0.0031020737,0.0022595825,0.058734298,0.044387814,0.24520555,0.010067458,0.28284985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033668245,0.0021204175,0.42764962,0.00024127132,0.00064252806,0.002267358,0.011930517,0.15770888,0.010864527,0.35825634,0.02766659,0.0003153398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035136063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005729293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026411807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002083297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066393014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08835626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022363387","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.07.006","title":"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Regional resilience and development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Fragility; Risk analysis (engineering); Diversification (marketing strategy); Event (particle physics); Redundancy (engineering); Adaptability; Environmental resource management; Psychological resilience; Computer science; Business; Economics; Computer security; Psychology","score_opus":0.04201372401906497,"score_gpt":0.20953025920167076,"score_spread":0.16751653518260579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022363387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002651653,0.001297999,0.007424174,0.008079346,0.0012075996,0.000036786514,0.0011626948,0.0003956162,0.97774416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030187128,0.0012948753,0.0025070868,0.001334119,0.00044196978,0.000037229565,0.00091343495,0.0001040227,0.9631802],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997131,0.00003866164,0.00001098231,0.00005871306,0.00014387905,0.000034686887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993376,0.00009228056,0.00003724737,0.00016407672,0.0002600527,0.00010862632],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047054238,0.00029266186,0.00024850358,0.0010235129,0.00080532243,0.0022640948,0.0004950195,0.0010066264,0.26995108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018624673,0.00011305248,0.00019013956,0.0009810663,0.000649471,0.0015397707,0.00080326997,0.0008857526,0.13762301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004422715,0.000048197668,0.00094696815,0.000070552625,0.0000065026093,0.00008220151,0.0001475911,0.0003178067,0.0010768167,0.35026738,0.46080548,0.18618616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045611137,0.000007082983,0.0010657305,0.000029779887,0.0000032328337,0.00010635013,0.000065057604,0.00022119298,0.00059195166,0.04373112,0.95416975,0.000004168559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020355433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036477905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7300489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010299849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010156024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023169256","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.022","title":"","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.02165735177075505,"score_gpt":0.23291462682147784,"score_spread":0.21125727505072278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023169256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041641127,0.0010480385,0.0012978708,0.007904766,0.00047195752,0.000016303835,0.00049687206,0.00010955752,0.9844906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08502705,0.0018399707,0.0012538336,0.002615435,0.00034792273,0.000024633648,0.0006629845,0.000063189094,0.90816504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997911,0.000031781972,0.0000066609414,0.000036217694,0.000099851684,0.000034417113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994342,0.00010597361,0.000024405423,0.0001299113,0.00020134149,0.00010418091],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048417159,0.00027930384,0.0002662874,0.0009012256,0.00076895725,0.0032086738,0.0003555447,0.0013492794,0.22311708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017932465,0.0001426583,0.00019749191,0.0007092705,0.0010139777,0.0013771711,0.00073346,0.0011753567,0.053076707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081457474,0.0001225745,0.0016167598,0.000073210955,0.000018162054,0.00006585358,0.00011010156,0.00031225666,0.0007917324,0.4382164,0.44386575,0.11472575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016815058,0.00002062111,0.0037989954,0.000078124656,0.000020628351,0.0001241606,0.00018625724,0.00032522212,0.00067866815,0.11330176,0.8814413,0.0000073755928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031528503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063442215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7768829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011165885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011348207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048569219","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106806","title":"Ecological Economics Beyond Markets","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Sustainability; Economics; Redistribution (election); Market system; Ecological economics; Sketch; Goods and services; Market economy; Ecology; Political science","score_opus":0.014197157965195965,"score_gpt":0.1695979451819698,"score_spread":0.15540078721677383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048569219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016452512,0.017639333,0.03633578,0.07750705,0.0013146773,0.000037809263,0.00015549177,0.00004914558,0.8505083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78211546,0.01714257,0.006194209,0.013658629,0.00386176,0.00011664103,0.00009763853,0.000102280006,0.17671098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994778,0.00020571807,0.000014557902,0.00008695761,0.00014525653,0.000069747104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885654,0.0007066513,0.000065383894,0.00012018176,0.00014743033,0.00010386086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010003987,0.00052949967,0.00051393785,0.0010108588,0.0010225528,0.0040310286,0.00052528107,0.0028506252,0.018242352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027866699,0.00025004367,0.0003994194,0.0009780066,0.006663766,0.008443431,0.0018750927,0.0027580974,0.0013202965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012353947,0.0000059746994,0.000036796966,0.000008999616,0.0000015473585,0.000010088582,0.000026633006,0.00019063879,0.00002354056,0.9951617,0.0019533436,0.0025795535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012358295,0.0000012605021,0.00005127975,0.00001454207,8.353672e-7,0.000008100668,0.000031132746,0.00016924506,0.000011868031,0.9838801,0.015829464,9.210763e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032914085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024473055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018242352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027544745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015478403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061026752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132254837","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106985","title":"Rhetoric, epistemology and climate change economics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Climate change; Economics; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Natural resource economics; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.13583233503859612,"score_gpt":0.25574319551713226,"score_spread":0.11991086047853614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132254837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045325812,0.056487504,0.0799183,0.31649962,0.0044189226,0.000056787503,0.0002726094,0.0001179328,0.49690253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95192295,0.00879936,0.011183857,0.012029765,0.0044396757,0.00013278195,0.00012923131,0.00011832315,0.011244023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920935,0.005866495,0.0002931203,0.0005316161,0.00089451787,0.00032076117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96126753,0.03427356,0.0015213956,0.0009510382,0.001418087,0.0005683284],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01134433,0.0006365305,0.0010249126,0.0055260486,0.0055850474,0.014595707,0.0014093549,0.008255533,0.0072570555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028671267,0.0005983867,0.0005730303,0.0035679587,0.032449443,0.017954981,0.0040592914,0.0069149393,0.0008042331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006841715,0.000008369663,0.00008880851,0.00004190311,0.0000035462679,0.000024956476,0.0008931111,0.00009438429,0.000025850837,0.99555355,0.0016230564,0.0016355468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086441405,0.0000033680951,0.00008473534,0.00008340198,0.0000039007778,0.000033347416,0.0005325106,0.00027449013,0.000038401282,0.98805726,0.010875482,0.000004431552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016898201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012816192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050696726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029174916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059995234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139265487","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107004","title":"Commons grabbing and agribusiness: Violence, resistance and social mobilization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Directorate for Geosciences; National Science Foundation; Generalitat de Catalunya; European Commission; National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center; FP7 Coherent Development of Research Policies","keywords":"Commons; Agrarian society; Land grabbing; Global commons; Political science; Economic system; CONTEST; Resource mobilization; Political economy; Social movement; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Politics; Agriculture; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.012560236481681307,"score_gpt":0.18081417804296704,"score_spread":0.16825394156128573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139265487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83437634,0.0045213597,0.0037736415,0.010475783,0.000091455826,0.000036187474,0.000068068504,0.000013194825,0.14664392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973247,0.0007757589,0.00019644694,0.00019398262,0.00002649114,0.000015814012,0.000011853979,0.0000039094,0.0014510246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741024,0.001654918,0.000063489024,0.00020740759,0.00026430664,0.00039962432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967912,0.001853103,0.0007999437,0.00013603951,0.000104454135,0.0003152299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017609566,0.00021817423,0.00021566465,0.0017131927,0.0032784238,0.005535312,0.0005536165,0.001051116,0.0033766287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033316144,0.00012317544,0.00018120027,0.001886481,0.019457486,0.0037855473,0.0064854883,0.0012591106,0.0001806932],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080969905,0.0001871187,0.06902277,0.00033471212,0.000048902333,0.0011212998,0.289433,0.00096171343,0.00091218506,0.57394814,0.0030665316,0.060882643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011762661,0.00012492872,0.14500704,0.00069051364,0.00002653043,0.0009265883,0.5473954,0.001678033,0.0006281154,0.20922068,0.09423354,0.00005685652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026572188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004769895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005535312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028244937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013876818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020493269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143862038","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107054","title":"Ecological trap in tourism-urbanization: Simulating the stagnation and restoration of urbanization from the perspective of government incentives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"Urbanization; Tourism; Incentive; Government (linguistics); Natural resource economics; Business; Ecotourism; Environmental planning; Economics; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Economic growth; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.010803128671082816,"score_gpt":0.20239162488820817,"score_spread":0.19158849621712534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143862038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98475176,0.00010538789,0.0025700273,0.0014756187,0.000060383634,0.000040982177,0.00084546104,0.00006009765,0.010090311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970285,0.000049898765,0.00081539113,0.00006725835,0.000007519109,0.0000251798,0.00015113875,0.000014953207,0.0018401901],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944025,0.00027591767,0.000020082234,0.000058163987,0.000024629639,0.00018090756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971501,0.0014754689,0.00028008147,0.00012641176,0.00021134764,0.0007565965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012457774,0.0005064575,0.00093331205,0.0009812069,0.0009066085,0.0024700956,0.0020152587,0.0036039967,0.008679784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005495356,0.00056916254,0.0012360405,0.0015250129,0.001897871,0.0018446327,0.0017179062,0.002590716,0.0003598831],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036576376,0.00047370017,0.009632521,0.00003733171,0.00005098841,0.00018744792,0.00013460818,0.9661112,0.00022688253,0.019747168,0.0017391798,0.0012931959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021129358,0.00013883096,0.0031061405,0.000010572923,0.0000265437,0.00001790398,0.00047548627,0.9901518,0.00009277622,0.005056279,0.0006899855,0.000022400132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11417167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112944566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11417167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004772753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028174904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22701424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154263767","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107062","title":"Sustainable commodity governance and the global south","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; International Studies Association","keywords":"Commodity; Commodity chain; Corporate governance; Sustainability; Context (archaeology); Environmental governance; Civil society; Global governance; Agency (philosophy); Futures contract; Business; Economics; Political science; Production (economics); Politics; Market economy; Sociology; Geography; Social science; Finance","score_opus":0.016092464997571734,"score_gpt":0.22404011491358047,"score_spread":0.20794764991600873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154263767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16053002,0.016179549,0.007868238,0.10416768,0.00030915937,0.000027295566,0.00013473252,0.00008145859,0.71070194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97676885,0.0039707203,0.0007577425,0.0018891406,0.00013899109,0.0000129232785,0.000027688018,0.000024883204,0.016409047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945074,0.00022586591,0.000016506992,0.000092027345,0.0001151177,0.000099718556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991404,0.00030917473,0.00016032864,0.00014553092,0.00012282674,0.00012176959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015718342,0.0001926084,0.00022830197,0.0010796974,0.0017028984,0.0057879738,0.00022669706,0.0010529085,0.0041340273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002181946,0.00015287807,0.00019884328,0.002373244,0.008361331,0.0038897383,0.0029265455,0.0016422825,0.0001807094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005149164,0.000005469393,0.0017798906,0.000014845632,0.0000046379946,0.000027336979,0.0010237832,0.00079893525,0.00009478356,0.9868923,0.0018968044,0.007456148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004277894,0.0000062581184,0.005134462,0.00008021239,0.0000069108337,0.0000327685,0.0019214345,0.00059751875,0.00012316811,0.90550643,0.08658056,0.0000060081543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0123448055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020332148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0123448055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004694184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046798987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03405881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182413613","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107142","title":"Have environmental preferences and willingness to pay remained stable before and during the global Covid-19 shock?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Horizon 2020; European Commission","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Flemish; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Economics; Shock (circulatory); Econometrics; Demographic economics; Multivariate statistics; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Public economics; Socioeconomics; Geography; Statistics; Mathematics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.04971093162918981,"score_gpt":0.21538982418235814,"score_spread":0.1656788925531683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182413613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998787,0.000028837681,0.00023899812,0.00019635353,0.000008651559,0.000008169382,0.0000765765,0.0000015182534,0.0006539387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994375,0.000016278189,0.00008360532,0.000084576066,0.0000050362787,0.000011210554,0.00008227869,0.0000012240819,0.00027835634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865294,0.00068631326,0.00005139413,0.00021860102,0.00010830735,0.00028239802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844492,0.009678847,0.0031206803,0.0013134433,0.00044149216,0.0009962325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005947677,0.00017398686,0.00046213839,0.00027290266,0.00039043243,0.0018719861,0.00046100936,0.0015456607,0.0035545945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020257303,0.0001841275,0.0005266108,0.00040577276,0.0013930572,0.0012909343,0.0007355746,0.0016797842,0.00036654904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0075606667,0.0029385963,0.9465131,0.000070351074,0.0004178866,0.0002875712,0.0022881653,0.0065732105,0.0028983133,0.0057556243,0.0007043526,0.023992138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014038983,0.0025344265,0.9784328,0.000020028754,0.00008030442,0.00007308398,0.0037466418,0.0072471756,0.00068488927,0.0060080937,0.000973715,0.000058444828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046576913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028856776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005947677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006847705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004778386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031454682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183380809","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107147","title":"The provision of drinking water in First Nations communities and Ontario municipalities: Insight into the emergence of water sharing arrangements","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Water supply; Geography; Potable water; Economic growth; Economics; Environmental science; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.0258030149207484,"score_gpt":0.24906510411169003,"score_spread":0.22326208919094162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183380809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99764746,0.000041071005,0.000058785678,0.00011579347,9.0081875e-7,0.000014613041,0.0002883027,0.0000010009828,0.0018321057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989573,0.00007426416,0.00009332568,0.000009317322,0.0000011721526,0.0000108783315,0.00021739553,0.0000014009202,0.0006349882],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906045,0.0001596646,0.000041532716,0.00011406851,0.00021578117,0.00040850285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956524,0.00077583746,0.0015459337,0.00018537408,0.00086381054,0.0009766525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008671023,0.00016489382,0.00029080585,0.0014493073,0.0026116997,0.001361059,0.0005651803,0.00029031,0.002224338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004813915,0.00023131097,0.00029015643,0.003520818,0.0013119533,0.000711705,0.0015710045,0.0003655412,0.00012230316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036546557,0.000022419263,0.9806847,0.000024392177,0.000016820244,0.00012224677,0.014395093,0.00014894345,0.00026554245,0.0005551692,0.00030366474,0.0034246019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016941339,0.0000073477054,0.9797111,0.000013983071,0.0000051105503,0.000020098634,0.018778643,0.00027958062,0.00003742253,0.000058218255,0.001082018,0.0000047176372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9601886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039811373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013721203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013332924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09955478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190574856","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107170","title":"What drives clearing of old-growth forest over secondary forests in tropical shifting cultivation systems? Evidence from the Peruvian Amazon","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Clearing; Secondary forest; Clearance; Geography; Agroforestry; Old-growth forest; Amazon rainforest; Floodplain; Shifting cultivation; Old field; Forestry; Agriculture; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Business","score_opus":0.02032589800195053,"score_gpt":0.2063729794049017,"score_spread":0.18604708140295118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190574856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99517363,0.00033043153,0.000079285266,0.00058629987,0.0000029303576,0.0000068922304,0.000043120137,0.000001617339,0.003775763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995633,0.00016940098,0.000033215485,0.000031073705,0.000005655694,0.0000022188924,0.00002156195,0.0000012330825,0.0001723809],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992581,0.00031129777,0.000033147695,0.00012310837,0.00006555881,0.00020887268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879886,0.005548919,0.004249512,0.00051189354,0.0006823462,0.0010187116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014464029,0.00017035918,0.00025931618,0.0007292503,0.0010042049,0.0018811694,0.00061869517,0.00069601537,0.0072184964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00840652,0.00022613877,0.00022167599,0.0009698725,0.0020346302,0.0010086487,0.0009924973,0.0005292456,0.00021163741],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041458872,0.00021993132,0.97274864,0.0001601422,0.00017116022,0.0007541428,0.005743766,0.0004859579,0.0014257552,0.0041620806,0.0003901063,0.013323769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021218046,0.000047207228,0.9898134,0.00004158489,0.00006495229,0.00010255979,0.006778633,0.00033630015,0.00013904554,0.0013913728,0.0012578645,0.0000058237106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02455025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060120173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02455025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00112433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007833231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048814714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198551001","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107206","title":"Socio-ecological transition in a Mediterranean agroecosystem: What energy flows tell us about agricultural landscapes ruled by landlords, peasants and tourism (Mallorca, 1860-1956-2012)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Agriculture; Peasant; Agroecosystem; Agrarian society; Tourism; Economic rent; Prosperity; Firewood; Natural resource economics; Geography; Agroforestry; Agricultural economics; Economics; Business; Market economy; Environmental science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.005060497336348677,"score_gpt":0.18135474180793004,"score_spread":0.17629424447158137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198551001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967623,0.00032478187,0.00008151138,0.00028159845,0.000006320563,0.000004031946,0.00032981116,0.0000020958717,0.0022075302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998899,0.00021779453,0.000065708606,0.000030254318,0.000009557796,0.0000028755733,0.00033419265,0.0000021548453,0.00043857508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998857,0.00002317135,0.0000063824964,0.000027894619,0.000014692242,0.000042198946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973506,0.000039228962,0.00010225551,0.000016903363,0.000040930234,0.00006568619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033817088,0.00010101871,0.00014515538,0.00089438,0.00043672393,0.0014509016,0.00024162109,0.00036362783,0.0016513357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007580962,0.00006969835,0.0002284496,0.0010765761,0.0010353122,0.0010336865,0.0007070505,0.0003352498,0.00016033699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018953223,0.000076191136,0.95113677,0.000058749967,0.000096089745,0.0006021231,0.020040523,0.000893491,0.0007242165,0.0043350463,0.0016116992,0.020235596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013948849,0.000020478927,0.9884862,0.000021801825,0.0000049632645,0.00004773464,0.0080821505,0.00025758313,0.000044167748,0.0003168517,0.002710458,0.0000061179576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042356696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06802057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042356696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018900136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037999303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08422029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214609504","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107250","title":"Low agricultural potential exacerbates the effect of temperature on civil conflicts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Civil Conflict; Climate change; Economics; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Development economics; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.007531459204382038,"score_gpt":0.21878734197032182,"score_spread":0.2112558827659398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214609504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98171693,0.00009914074,0.00027446388,0.00085891597,0.000014671481,0.0000033859453,0.00003762492,0.0000037024627,0.016991185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994784,0.000042920496,0.00004641423,0.000043625303,0.000007182804,0.0000019451368,0.000007934346,0.0000017552013,0.00036994592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943644,0.00027913577,0.000016047488,0.000047910416,0.000038214785,0.0001821629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758065,0.00078372296,0.0007115071,0.00013825328,0.00013610857,0.000649726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063125126,0.00022646006,0.0002447914,0.00036696528,0.0010757553,0.001567417,0.00031876416,0.00088608055,0.016856408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002970911,0.00020684174,0.00030279957,0.0003372168,0.0010034182,0.0009805135,0.0017743559,0.00083192164,0.0005070055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025244285,0.001788963,0.8169631,0.00027849534,0.0005936029,0.002972527,0.004930503,0.02272898,0.038012095,0.059127428,0.0058033066,0.04427645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006222856,0.00040814318,0.947422,0.000067884015,0.00013042876,0.00063178234,0.009348694,0.0065147216,0.0016523385,0.026785506,0.0069344616,0.000041697236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037873425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011009023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016856408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072505657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071312493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056390285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214662066","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107272","title":"The Intersection of Biophysical Economics and Political Economy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Income distribution; Economy; Geography","score_opus":0.011886318393919772,"score_gpt":0.24099412963602887,"score_spread":0.2291078112421091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214662066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034902796,0.09006231,0.06336658,0.28785887,0.001995599,0.000033854252,0.00022364827,0.00009313192,0.52146316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9138933,0.041787513,0.00981673,0.010487613,0.004753861,0.00009533284,0.000103935905,0.00008898888,0.018972648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963063,0.0025290472,0.00006939138,0.00029562818,0.0005158429,0.00028387262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837646,0.013754776,0.00058497867,0.0005444125,0.00070073723,0.00065058365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004297537,0.0005158249,0.0011007636,0.0037455843,0.00284318,0.012991691,0.00090372225,0.004894434,0.013575521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008675239,0.00046651668,0.000593885,0.004593358,0.024508793,0.015176543,0.0037562703,0.0055795074,0.0008278626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034637094,0.000008562476,0.00016160567,0.000022393278,0.0000034881368,0.00001601722,0.00013013039,0.00019401006,0.000020448842,0.9961254,0.0010083667,0.002306137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003111284,0.0000030195886,0.00035617102,0.00004445106,0.0000023881423,0.000019572242,0.0004370533,0.00044452987,0.000019017003,0.983622,0.015044972,0.0000035861306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003924732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037791743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013575521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047500166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038946727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045414627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205927185","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107337","title":"A new accounting framework for assessing forest footprint of nations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Eusko Jaurlaritza; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Natural resource economics; Supply chain; Ecological footprint; Agriculture; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Economics; Sustainability; Agricultural economics; Geography; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.017668737998521422,"score_gpt":0.26658558434678326,"score_spread":0.24891684634826183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205927185","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03897334,0.0009977701,0.9308161,0.00080896646,0.0002137067,0.00028497746,0.004688688,0.0006056753,0.022610763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44450396,0.0010775274,0.5456347,0.00011426967,0.0001755506,0.0004233641,0.0033045402,0.00018097331,0.0045851767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974617,0.00093143096,0.00023775909,0.00038421454,0.0007789741,0.00020590014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732274,0.00077362143,0.00052366813,0.000495566,0.0007768071,0.000107572705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047181677,0.0012361106,0.00061188417,0.0042977105,0.00088834565,0.0038707056,0.0016255357,0.0008051236,0.0026577723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008551459,0.00028306528,0.0013493494,0.004925471,0.0007715373,0.0041600014,0.0016745803,0.0010672305,0.00028524722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003166457,0.00008254177,0.031804603,0.00014849601,0.00017323645,0.00024125932,0.00045347217,0.30329487,0.0012669157,0.48328367,0.008954225,0.17026497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000912346,0.00006461581,0.016429912,0.00012280498,0.00007539592,0.00019246688,0.0006000002,0.78345406,0.0011770264,0.15559675,0.04215062,0.0001272382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030223705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021831565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030223705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00225595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003493647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06009555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291824470","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107586","title":"Slouching or speeding toward net zero? Evidence from COVID-19 energy-related stimulus policies in the G20","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Monetary Fund","keywords":"Stimulus (psychology); Gross domestic product; Energy policy; Economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Renewable energy; Economic growth; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09038587769700672,"score_gpt":0.2567182668029219,"score_spread":0.1663323891059152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291824470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94331694,0.0007704904,0.0010460498,0.0058875214,0.00010692686,0.000024708159,0.0004249375,0.000038087277,0.048384327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99300766,0.00030712294,0.00013782072,0.0006638188,0.000023850049,0.0000074507525,0.00017005562,0.00001197409,0.005670329],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991387,0.00031069468,0.000049849914,0.00012539452,0.00013018951,0.00024512433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794718,0.010321799,0.0052902442,0.0015725637,0.0017047088,0.0016388106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030940452,0.0002186851,0.00034506255,0.00060667534,0.0008659918,0.0019158553,0.0005893082,0.0013100916,0.021695556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01877151,0.00019746911,0.00029759252,0.00073331845,0.0018790719,0.0012762442,0.0012534771,0.0019064685,0.0015616949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072595007,0.0021467651,0.5712328,0.0004976271,0.00025940296,0.0005440273,0.0037326056,0.0048382827,0.0028019745,0.25997564,0.022786867,0.12392452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006150863,0.0009655979,0.83726966,0.00029424342,0.00030345342,0.00012973079,0.008726387,0.0032666565,0.0034062609,0.10773628,0.03721285,0.00007379279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013214295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019885555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021695556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084977015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012996781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07257885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308153131","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107609","title":"Public preferences for marine plastic litter management across Europe","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Microplastics and Plastic Pollution","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Horizon 2020; HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme","keywords":"Marine Strategy Framework Directive; Water Framework Directive; Willingness to pay; Marine debris; European union; Plastic pollution; Environmental resource management; Nexus (standard); Contingent valuation; Directive; Macro; Empirical evidence; Baltic sea; Public economics; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Business; Economics; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Pollution; International trade; Biology; Engineering; Water quality","score_opus":0.03227097351513488,"score_gpt":0.21085233046492785,"score_spread":0.17858135694979296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308153131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99392736,0.00014097389,0.0006554091,0.00027695773,0.0000068146496,0.000014963355,0.00024681215,0.0000055500122,0.0047250907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987734,0.00009206448,0.00027176825,0.00013334151,0.0000045006404,0.00001625174,0.0002383821,0.000002770885,0.00046749727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974094,0.0014573333,0.00014631257,0.00030576132,0.0003765806,0.00030453992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99256814,0.0041943593,0.0019758707,0.00062937284,0.00038853212,0.00024371165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052329157,0.00018361538,0.00040009717,0.0004664722,0.00031697768,0.0020349545,0.00020801257,0.0011256776,0.003141762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009475002,0.000130104,0.0005243336,0.000738449,0.00084847125,0.0007608703,0.0010167123,0.0005690592,0.00022869892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003647085,0.002125072,0.82678306,0.00036820502,0.0010696371,0.0012019151,0.006804291,0.03726058,0.0056307386,0.028249256,0.0062466315,0.08061354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030377472,0.0010337003,0.9468767,0.00025709334,0.00024256895,0.0003347696,0.011409569,0.008835941,0.0024920325,0.011374667,0.0167403,0.00009892359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033304289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003337067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052329157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089388585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038713627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027674615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311092030","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107686","title":"Social outcomes of energy use in the United Kingdom: Household energy footprints and their links to well-being","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Overconsumption; Energy poverty; Energy (signal processing); Context (archaeology); Footprint; Economics; Poverty; Ecological footprint; Public economics; Inequality; Natural resource economics; Energy consumption; Distribution (mathematics); Environmental economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Sustainability; Geography; Microeconomics; Ecology; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.045483615986571954,"score_gpt":0.22274770712551087,"score_spread":0.17726409113893893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311092030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943297,0.0011639982,0.00008352518,0.000562825,0.0000120610885,0.000005249609,0.0008861137,0.0000023847333,0.0029540672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992611,0.0002700285,0.000032556545,0.000027679042,0.0000024476208,0.000004614533,0.000209424,0.0000013599721,0.00019086321],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993855,0.00022552401,0.00007950792,0.00006565501,0.00011444423,0.00012938312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968604,0.0005878641,0.0014626795,0.00015976731,0.0005424424,0.00038684602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060966425,0.00021018888,0.0003137331,0.00094206375,0.00044875877,0.0015969275,0.00031954766,0.00038523073,0.003381687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003707346,0.00012259354,0.0003824266,0.0018455714,0.00070718286,0.0008073474,0.0021563445,0.00048081303,0.00035472063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009347104,0.000029110146,0.98531544,0.00012371028,0.00010475331,0.00017930829,0.004014887,0.00030085474,0.00017148105,0.0005375938,0.0009320281,0.00819739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011463403,0.000018074956,0.9959913,0.000053412932,0.000010573689,0.00003464292,0.0030190845,0.000072125236,0.000025744826,0.00008393759,0.0006828261,0.0000071449012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17860098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27626976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17860098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001647518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064459944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3551228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323927867","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107793","title":"Stochastic growth and regime shift risk in renewable resource management","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Norges Forskningsråd; University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Alberta","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Time horizon; Renewable resource; Natural resource economics; Economics; Risk management; Renewable energy; Regime shift; Bioeconomics; Paradigm shift; Endogenous growth theory; Climate change; Growth model; Stochastic modelling; Microeconomics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Fishery; Geography","score_opus":0.013285766246554134,"score_gpt":0.23277491862576,"score_spread":0.21948915237920585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323927867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65149647,0.003913393,0.30590022,0.016584607,0.00058436,0.000048279446,0.00030411346,0.00019988655,0.020968635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99204916,0.0011036173,0.0021611496,0.00022220683,0.00023380805,0.000015805623,0.000054331293,0.000029835412,0.004129999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891555,0.00055955816,0.000053796244,0.00017485692,0.00015036222,0.00014582142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781024,0.018336812,0.0019398689,0.00044975433,0.0005615976,0.00060960755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005433889,0.00050811534,0.0011353613,0.00078529806,0.00066820544,0.0022999002,0.0008521565,0.0024349042,0.0031040923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022040589,0.0005165442,0.0008077487,0.00074679154,0.0034916305,0.0033952584,0.0018313018,0.002679795,0.00015855895],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000122009515,0.000089338246,0.011819976,0.000084775544,0.00020111844,0.00021246605,0.0002732955,0.41182882,0.0005378606,0.5571862,0.0032715134,0.01437261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016211974,0.00003349481,0.0024736382,0.000017255894,0.000025712214,0.00004134042,0.0001276229,0.37553933,0.00007531626,0.62083006,0.0007927521,0.00002721486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00469738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044869254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005433889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017706444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008460855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028737485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362636709","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107825","title":"Robust management strategies promoting ecological resilience and economic efficiency of a mixed conifer-broadleaf forest in Southwest Germany under the risk of severe drought","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Psychological resilience; Resilience (materials science); Net present value; Environmental resource management; Adaptive management; Adaptation (eye); Environmental science; Forest management; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Economics; Agroforestry; Biology; Microeconomics; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.015331614567147055,"score_gpt":0.21852964561398772,"score_spread":0.20319803104684067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362636709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994081,0.000024059582,0.00016942284,0.00007105352,0.0000012391929,0.0000053745403,0.000019640154,0.0000033390154,0.00029787113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999828,0.0000101281175,0.000071654,0.0000052504965,6.092951e-7,0.0000018136666,0.000007645425,4.4694298e-7,0.00007451121],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997397,0.00007467821,0.000010659575,0.000023828332,0.000013821696,0.00013731599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999689,0.000043277094,0.00007052133,0.000022924767,0.00003086295,0.00014343498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006676424,0.00019401309,0.00018668249,0.00051392074,0.00077562826,0.0009176255,0.0003898,0.000339052,0.000779791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007829521,0.00009392297,0.00011421405,0.00034310514,0.0005303184,0.00046176717,0.0007941993,0.00016994255,0.00006208234],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003620459,0.0015852683,0.6359649,0.00022277619,0.00054323673,0.003456375,0.003475178,0.18216605,0.047511883,0.025706157,0.002836063,0.092911616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114414215,0.00083896,0.8961962,0.000053957072,0.00018973464,0.00025284602,0.0077437907,0.08260967,0.0035061084,0.0054373527,0.0030171813,0.00003970078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016952476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051562827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016952476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018044285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013746559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03370762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376269746","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107885","title":"Tropical mixed-species plantations can outperform monocultures in terms of carbon sequestration and economic return","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt","keywords":"Monoculture; Carbon sequestration; Reforestation; Agroforestry; Afforestation; Productivity; Carbon fibers; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Economics; Biology; Mathematics; Carbon dioxide","score_opus":0.01791207787919026,"score_gpt":0.22304674672001898,"score_spread":0.2051346688408287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376269746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99494874,0.00032275982,0.00051761756,0.000089436595,0.000009581124,0.000009673284,0.0000854032,0.000015553762,0.0040011895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990194,0.00015186894,0.00036199074,0.000029601526,0.0000034231957,0.000003971291,0.00004243273,0.000003283414,0.0003839385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979264,0.0000656953,0.000010969356,0.000038339174,0.000031698444,0.000060708408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913776,0.00020631125,0.00021793928,0.000097624295,0.00010137651,0.00023890405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062271435,0.0002818803,0.00029299856,0.00038338735,0.00036024078,0.00091740733,0.00034554838,0.00026055137,0.0043308996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011596655,0.00008366541,0.00026942906,0.00056460773,0.000344623,0.0010972102,0.00058768946,0.00019148442,0.00032317018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012487093,0.0015716105,0.40679044,0.001105299,0.0016900973,0.0014512208,0.0005553067,0.04210171,0.23133491,0.018736115,0.003003271,0.2791729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041378153,0.0034491285,0.90100247,0.00012765318,0.00088268635,0.0010081461,0.00210261,0.03428033,0.026012195,0.017529026,0.0131182615,0.00007365213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076505756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03007846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076505756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010261481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064582773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015212119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378448645","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107896","title":"Are greenspaces too green? Landscape preferences and water use in urban parks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Department of Water and Environmental Regulation, Government of Western Australia; Department of Environment Regulation, Government of Western Australia; Forrest Research Foundation","keywords":"Groundcover; Lawn; Public park; Geography; Flexibility (engineering); Vegetation (pathology); Urban landscape; Urban park; Environmental resource management; Scale (ratio); Landscaping; Water use; Preference; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Ecology; Mathematics; Cartography","score_opus":0.13261046723804765,"score_gpt":0.210055332050083,"score_spread":0.07744486481203536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378448645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99828476,0.000088895176,0.000099930476,0.00021652834,0.0000021831233,0.0000013592188,0.00002531633,4.4899073e-7,0.0012806021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99981207,0.000027908876,0.000016152511,0.00001001832,0.000001936521,5.407749e-7,0.000009142111,3.8806547e-7,0.00012196527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960905,0.00017337622,0.000017920906,0.000038338127,0.000046624387,0.000114784336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693394,0.0015086413,0.0007386152,0.000099847704,0.00017665402,0.00054230884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008076887,0.00008853614,0.00017726446,0.00050659775,0.00040144104,0.0013308459,0.00032508015,0.0006703496,0.0040992945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045422656,0.00016189815,0.00029516165,0.0010204936,0.0010405282,0.0015652723,0.0004705471,0.0005641268,0.00014819737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004985347,0.00028979525,0.9739595,0.000033901586,0.00015594669,0.00037220065,0.0017880221,0.0032844713,0.00070424244,0.0064870743,0.0006073538,0.011818872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012024385,0.0000836197,0.97019625,0.000015779548,0.00003810366,0.00015179669,0.013296213,0.0038017742,0.00014690598,0.011581546,0.0006607987,0.00001518635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017796604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047876537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017796604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069778605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024141064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035386026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378637299","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107889","title":"Climate change impacts on Mediterranean fisheries: A sensitivity and vulnerability analysis for main commercial species","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation","keywords":"Climate change; Mediterranean climate; Vulnerability (computing); Temperate climate; Adaptive capacity; Fishery; Food security; Geography; Vulnerability assessment; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Biology; Agriculture; Economics; Psychological resilience","score_opus":0.09625510322514001,"score_gpt":0.292091108649847,"score_spread":0.19583600542470697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378637299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99721247,0.00010190221,0.00096384255,0.00012164861,0.000007227957,0.000016812653,0.00027852948,0.000012324918,0.0012851706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999193,0.000060992585,0.00022803363,0.000018921597,0.0000071533714,0.000009709603,0.00016391129,0.0000045290726,0.0003137263],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960476,0.00017101748,0.000018246945,0.000051869487,0.00004793201,0.00010620924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981413,0.0011626269,0.00019816472,0.00017185944,0.00018001252,0.00014612643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014726488,0.00055186497,0.00037964305,0.0014582048,0.00033310693,0.0007718623,0.00041168183,0.0005591249,0.0022578612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036517736,0.00023631666,0.002305111,0.0010641093,0.00044670823,0.00084704586,0.0009993693,0.0005303323,0.00013290196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001635058,0.0005829139,0.4371453,0.00019240711,0.003218716,0.0012788884,0.0005196461,0.50834376,0.01037206,0.006435511,0.0025701139,0.027705614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005661148,0.00093430834,0.68472874,0.000029825982,0.00089576864,0.0004503037,0.0009909285,0.30084944,0.0026430155,0.0068198564,0.0015235656,0.00007759968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0174603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010864101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0174603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001240074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003722065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03471732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379806329","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107903","title":"Forest adaptation strategies to reconcile timber production and carbon sequestration objectives under multiple risks of extreme drought and windstorm events","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg; Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Diversification (marketing strategy); Natural resource economics; Valuation (finance); Production (economics); Forest management; Carbon sink; Wood production; Environmental science; Business; Environmental resource management; Climate change; Economics; Agroforestry; Ecology; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08717048220809238,"score_gpt":0.27610956145614124,"score_spread":0.18893907924804887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379806329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88787353,0.0006894135,0.05608543,0.006197767,0.00014698331,0.00023137972,0.00020956989,0.00015899992,0.048406903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958405,0.000117983756,0.0027181474,0.00015784735,0.000016078302,0.000029063249,0.000021381229,0.000007047702,0.0010919647],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994929,0.00020692161,0.000019313362,0.000045800272,0.000045865447,0.0001891855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994999,0.00011466492,0.00014961459,0.00003724578,0.00007423756,0.00012424534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014831094,0.000300539,0.000207073,0.0005307591,0.0005211125,0.0013868298,0.0007426101,0.000991054,0.0032230676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019211803,0.00015044428,0.0002675012,0.00048518798,0.0004933999,0.0012109829,0.0013192483,0.0006520035,0.00016985378],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006943715,0.0012721461,0.09193927,0.00035763555,0.00072334334,0.0012757977,0.001520252,0.49743125,0.024489857,0.14078797,0.01083245,0.22867568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022939508,0.00096503994,0.19142261,0.00026706076,0.0004680628,0.00086990994,0.012676549,0.502685,0.0050558546,0.24869663,0.03649337,0.0001705744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00258674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013798323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032230676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092734344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016472137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010782242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380765023","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107917","title":"Ship-owner response to carbon taxes: Industry and environmental implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bunker; Tonne; Natural resource economics; Agriculture; Economics; Environmental science; Agricultural economics; Business; Waste management; Engineering","score_opus":0.014390156892484143,"score_gpt":0.21734727030696546,"score_spread":0.2029571134144813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380765023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8886933,0.00038237672,0.0015527984,0.011387183,0.00011697971,0.00004011889,0.00045045302,0.000042280226,0.09733452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98956245,0.00015398751,0.000114526614,0.00033819958,0.00002273856,0.0000058636974,0.00005819567,0.0000069466378,0.009737106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990754,0.0003335123,0.000029274292,0.00006540981,0.00018620378,0.00031017943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930615,0.0036082142,0.0008813156,0.00024216031,0.0016675267,0.0005392802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001706468,0.00019252172,0.00035749562,0.00055809494,0.00075067696,0.0022043516,0.0006006727,0.002097106,0.02127871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00952146,0.00015877135,0.00045845774,0.0007906868,0.00066564936,0.0012897963,0.0008311373,0.0012729167,0.0009597995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004870188,0.003932736,0.40300745,0.0004312867,0.0005859622,0.002892388,0.0018322841,0.17812285,0.008315668,0.21231452,0.06730054,0.11639417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045130507,0.0013233996,0.4932801,0.00016896444,0.00046082377,0.0008339699,0.032819353,0.23233981,0.010548203,0.1712805,0.056326065,0.00016753167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019973025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030381586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02127871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024570778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002187885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0711844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386322616","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107974","title":"The complex relationships between non-food agriculture and the sustainable bioeconomy: The French case","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; European Regional Development Fund; Laboratoire d'Excellence Dynamiques Territoriales et Spatiales","keywords":"Commodification; Sustainability; Agriculture; Diversity (politics); Competition (biology); Value (mathematics); Sustainable agriculture; Capitalism; Business; Economics; Natural resource economics; Political science; Geography; Economy; Ecology","score_opus":0.030418925418775767,"score_gpt":0.2052202370313909,"score_spread":0.1748013116126151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386322616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5686644,0.022350676,0.006001929,0.049953822,0.00008450889,0.000031734777,0.0002907991,0.000024014294,0.35259807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98937875,0.0030019307,0.00046636493,0.0006294954,0.000052424868,0.000010274334,0.000030326839,0.0000054283023,0.0064250706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982691,0.0008621408,0.000028395147,0.00010355645,0.00016798501,0.00056872034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710196,0.0019997952,0.0002445159,0.00011719053,0.00026262694,0.00027401804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018098447,0.0004181658,0.00046126146,0.0015244458,0.0025604956,0.0061148587,0.00055477174,0.0027389938,0.0045956345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003065803,0.00021073855,0.00066133117,0.002410693,0.0036139763,0.0021081243,0.0018243837,0.0011251067,0.00019876366],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047264326,0.000060099166,0.009592807,0.000064103595,0.000050834125,0.0017030467,0.0007363781,0.0067843283,0.0002833421,0.9689285,0.0027131413,0.009036161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113449045,0.00014150613,0.07360863,0.00054392166,0.00020517908,0.0028277836,0.0099420585,0.025814995,0.00072456076,0.67880183,0.20715536,0.000120708195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20405798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19858256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20405798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011654433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038508868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4057405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386395378","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107978","title":"Indigenous people's perceptions of benefits and costs of China's second phase of the grain for green program and the influencing factors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Sichuan Agricultural University; University of Toronto","keywords":"Ordered probit; Probit model; Multivariate probit model; Perception; China; Safety net; Indigenous; Sustainability; Psychological intervention; Public economics; Socioeconomics; Economics; Economic inequality; Psychology; Demographic economics; Inequality; Geography; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.056119187511537695,"score_gpt":0.2445566391289194,"score_spread":0.1884374516173817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386395378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99727064,0.000028268338,0.000018933864,0.00013388602,0.0000019159181,0.000003826645,0.000011750477,4.0851268e-7,0.0025303764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939036,0.000033567412,0.000018631641,0.000026462647,0.0000017398582,0.0000020351754,0.000009493341,3.4862833e-7,0.000517342],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939823,0.00012261065,0.000035933717,0.000036746413,0.00015951703,0.00024684673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984263,0.0003585573,0.00042519614,0.000033856217,0.00024531563,0.0005108986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010015072,0.0001232557,0.0001362382,0.0006788815,0.0010796619,0.0011577207,0.00023679211,0.00041275856,0.0031278622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020208065,0.00011449637,0.00022876741,0.0007028111,0.0010777598,0.0006783433,0.0006553577,0.00065217196,0.0000984039],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031578273,0.00028307256,0.92555135,0.000074681426,0.00007802623,0.00075636007,0.053913582,0.00058318663,0.0021271138,0.0045888205,0.0005015036,0.011226583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013735373,0.000103767925,0.92675203,0.000025685269,0.000033630535,0.000095758274,0.06975209,0.0006517234,0.00022158954,0.00052337593,0.0018067253,0.000020033394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11321695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19144194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11321695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021354458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018116435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2251159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386435029","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107964","title":"Bird feeding and biodiversity: The decline of the Willow Tit","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Willow; Habitat; Ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Population; Trophic cascade; Biodiversity; Habitat destruction; Competition (biology); Predator; Biology; Ornithology; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Demography; Southern Hemisphere","score_opus":0.022821693917852034,"score_gpt":0.21085489022207896,"score_spread":0.18803319630422693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386435029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976792,0.0004489153,0.000020037196,0.001150076,0.000008203893,0.0000013127242,0.00008749284,0.0000010180289,0.00060384744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999059,0.00023630215,0.000021393742,0.00015362007,0.000029213905,0.0000018323756,0.00010345215,0.000001772419,0.0003935469],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983716,0.00004400988,0.000008358536,0.000023319391,0.000023412202,0.00006383054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912184,0.00012068867,0.00027956144,0.00003355625,0.00013995433,0.00030442426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008422727,0.000105675266,0.00017726193,0.00063325604,0.0007290516,0.00086087896,0.00050012465,0.0009075873,0.001807234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024515968,0.000120497185,0.00015396178,0.00076195144,0.0014138314,0.000779904,0.0007156289,0.0007455084,0.00015935772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032888603,0.00012684077,0.9814105,0.000038344857,0.000069874644,0.0004306452,0.001516869,0.00016747483,0.00087438035,0.0007122546,0.0012690241,0.013055039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019743882,0.000022496273,0.99826306,0.0000036538308,0.0000074007476,0.0001307879,0.0008344737,0.000090428744,0.000020438349,0.00007680885,0.00054698385,0.0000015746676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07210999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.122279026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07210999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006659638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005291856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14338052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386493203","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107986","title":"Two currencies – Rethinking energy and the economy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Interdependence; Computable general equilibrium; Laws of thermodynamics; Energy (signal processing); Neoclassical economics; Capital (architecture); General equilibrium theory; Value (mathematics); Economy; Macroeconomics; Physics; Non-equilibrium thermodynamics; Thermodynamics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02692246168608455,"score_gpt":0.26449722151356897,"score_spread":0.2375747598274844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386493203","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064279675,0.099398494,0.028154332,0.43157393,0.0086288145,0.00004448456,0.0001865692,0.00007482751,0.3676589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8760363,0.040850695,0.008361189,0.036380835,0.0054528164,0.00010839609,0.00009494448,0.0002465777,0.032468308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973316,0.0014216981,0.00008402266,0.00031808496,0.00048376885,0.00036074218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946343,0.0036647257,0.00026481794,0.00054389244,0.0005433929,0.00034901424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005732929,0.000767171,0.0010580458,0.0024329256,0.0035200717,0.012408273,0.001228033,0.0053464957,0.0105706835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009765535,0.00041536623,0.00064337865,0.002614875,0.027001783,0.03443005,0.0058989516,0.007156552,0.000833569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016331722,0.000009054612,0.00013077116,0.00003690273,0.000007173479,0.000027800572,0.00060099794,0.0001006688,0.000087212866,0.9890076,0.0026244905,0.0073510706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000616362,0.000009569764,0.00028610078,0.0001369664,0.000009200581,0.000028349488,0.001877137,0.00017661898,0.00011930573,0.9229474,0.07439277,0.000010346257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048811026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049314033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012408273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00439596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040581347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035362422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390122601","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108072","title":"Estimating the relationship between EROI and profitability of oil sands mining, 1997–2016","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Profitability index; Economics; Context (archaeology); Premise; Production (economics); Oil sands; Energy (signal processing); Econometrics; Crude oil; Renewable energy; Natural resource economics; Microeconomics; Asphalt; Ecology; Finance; Mathematics; Petroleum engineering; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06219259573469365,"score_gpt":0.30744481082308656,"score_spread":0.2452522150883929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390122601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965821,0.00019327739,0.0003184473,0.00017848953,0.000009925295,0.0000048553475,0.0018268273,0.0000096164395,0.000876378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938752,0.00017984741,0.00024456074,0.000016582,0.000014464209,0.000006015152,0.004252557,0.000004391807,0.0014063691],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999433,0.000108530345,0.00007852602,0.00013194072,0.000106346866,0.00014162614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559337,0.0016439536,0.00173209,0.00017427705,0.00055597076,0.00030041122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018874552,0.0002690294,0.00022035369,0.0011734655,0.00025355179,0.0009599513,0.0007185357,0.0006172327,0.0015644275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00658057,0.00030019478,0.0007225647,0.001259053,0.00045488362,0.0009778547,0.00086257653,0.00092194777,0.00052720774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008981067,0.00003179863,0.9932569,0.000011046978,0.00016158182,0.000046138866,0.000043373722,0.0032763802,0.0000878785,0.00023642558,0.00033242957,0.0024261728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081956305,0.00007023756,0.9842345,0.000022305927,0.00011075778,0.000105886174,0.00067801576,0.0118058855,0.0004707253,0.00020076158,0.0022812325,0.000011454142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13532937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16391146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13532937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014563634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012415154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26908332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396840778","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108219","title":"Renewable energy and well-being in remote Indigenous communities of Canada: A panel analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Renewable energy; Indigenous; Business; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Economic growth; Economics; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.010737180742003463,"score_gpt":0.17856098858590677,"score_spread":0.1678238078439033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396840778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98755056,0.00034335986,0.00016542552,0.00023984582,0.000009964331,0.000052835818,0.009485078,0.0000094164925,0.002143425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867176,0.0004522442,0.00032486784,0.0000983194,0.0000063423527,0.00006971297,0.0092451675,0.000007243484,0.0030785145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926645,0.0001069284,0.000033143864,0.00010249102,0.00015620312,0.00033488165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983783,0.00014839855,0.00018263643,0.0001045583,0.00075122184,0.0004348647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075893005,0.00043282929,0.0006050429,0.0014387832,0.0037927923,0.0014198249,0.0012842683,0.00044993026,0.0041799946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013261649,0.00034321836,0.001117055,0.004753785,0.00067202677,0.00037041804,0.0013334525,0.000857586,0.00048263412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008063422,0.000087412336,0.98824817,0.00004137301,0.00023110412,0.00010493913,0.0026620794,0.00076227315,0.00021611272,0.0003588504,0.0025338035,0.0046731643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073118404,0.000021042773,0.99054074,0.000046243997,0.00006961962,0.000025677906,0.0055606514,0.0010850098,0.00008942935,0.00007144646,0.002461446,0.000021319955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018409224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018409224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025004905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13356888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399702178","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108259","title":"Texas water markets: Understanding their trends, drivers, and future potential","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Water trading; Water scarcity; Scarcity; Population; Water use; Water resources; Business; Agriculture; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Economics; Geography; Water conservation; Ecology; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.009520393304712958,"score_gpt":0.16018515588463622,"score_spread":0.15066476257992326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399702178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90939885,0.0054156263,0.0059649064,0.04753131,0.000091910275,0.000033804357,0.0017637503,0.000055369474,0.029744428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930636,0.002624129,0.00070680195,0.00040143923,0.000058871185,0.000012355745,0.0002275101,0.000007953691,0.002897457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997968,0.00004042021,0.000008076798,0.000038302165,0.000046205245,0.000070167924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982686,0.0005424583,0.00062357396,0.00003660012,0.00035825782,0.00017050019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087163475,0.00018358981,0.00019711415,0.0010181328,0.0003915891,0.0027991468,0.0005208687,0.0005832818,0.004858146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025374696,0.00013672753,0.00018431034,0.0024464254,0.0007599472,0.0049315346,0.0005579178,0.001024522,0.00021340458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003430517,0.00042342086,0.5356257,0.00027599657,0.00012456946,0.0004219145,0.0022409284,0.02233895,0.0016081622,0.22452933,0.040726457,0.17134143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005014066,0.00021886322,0.6512764,0.00030662928,0.00010178871,0.00026100312,0.020550685,0.11420789,0.001160295,0.13199434,0.07978364,0.00008834394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035835527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08560981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035835527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032066645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021801745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071253896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400857209","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108306","title":"The economic cost of a 130 km/h speed limit: Insights for cost-benefit analyses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Transportation Planning and Optimization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Economics; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08272224197730789,"score_gpt":0.35587882163128537,"score_spread":0.2731565796539775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400857209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43616077,0.010487151,0.2732123,0.017493624,0.00075531437,0.000526625,0.0033369,0.0003059865,0.25772128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799993,0.0017937034,0.008246417,0.00021652447,0.000121292534,0.000087597335,0.00022328482,0.000062129555,0.0092497105],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988034,0.00047609082,0.00003509655,0.0001000836,0.00033525325,0.00025002906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964149,0.00275404,0.00021495664,0.0001353139,0.00031231894,0.00016846962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020131262,0.0011136481,0.0012350272,0.0016651731,0.0008126984,0.00349002,0.0018670122,0.0024068523,0.012525313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01011463,0.0009217427,0.0010306927,0.0016863622,0.0015534215,0.004764384,0.0012998551,0.002538357,0.0005777348],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038218586,0.00022899234,0.003161246,0.00027582262,0.00012519702,0.00032271142,0.00012444804,0.74176234,0.0014425635,0.20885128,0.004812449,0.03851069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006292897,0.00030064452,0.007326328,0.00023286886,0.00034469983,0.00043759352,0.0006792085,0.7445713,0.0009924312,0.236066,0.008867513,0.00011844583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013171218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012941878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013171218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004084342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023323626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04190135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401982876","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108361","title":"Energy constraints on macroeconomic paradigms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Energy (signal processing); Natural resource economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.017429510791528668,"score_gpt":0.2594300123014051,"score_spread":0.24200050150987645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401982876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15263318,0.011267277,0.008668999,0.054266527,0.00082548603,0.000049689184,0.00058997975,0.000060927803,0.77163786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788342,0.005739361,0.0013584064,0.0036996691,0.0005875721,0.00009276893,0.00016443866,0.000046220975,0.009477401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998912,0.00031266655,0.00006523641,0.00018356107,0.00020590791,0.00032062692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998382,0.0004949907,0.0003495799,0.00017812989,0.00032862922,0.00026672258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020158926,0.00040469962,0.00032222416,0.0015898009,0.00225177,0.008006694,0.00052348943,0.0014842537,0.006120556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045134635,0.00019052428,0.00034753844,0.0020319133,0.0070668724,0.0055163824,0.0039614215,0.0026464274,0.0005807633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015702131,0.000008936743,0.0006387905,0.000012171706,0.0000028500474,0.000031539526,0.00040543015,0.0003512167,0.00006346508,0.9931687,0.0011734447,0.0041277674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018345949,0.000018408446,0.0036442592,0.0001256996,0.0000055891182,0.00004477062,0.0015814519,0.0005755831,0.0001509859,0.89068615,0.10312753,0.000021126249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044853855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035121792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008006694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060973307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024299533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04423946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402536306","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108375","title":"Buzzword or breakthrough beyond growth? The mainstreaming of the Wellbeing Economy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstreaming; Inclusive growth; Natural resource economics; Economics; Business; Economic growth; Political science; Poverty","score_opus":0.019141238723208703,"score_gpt":0.2793148974564997,"score_spread":0.26017365873329096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402536306","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09736046,0.01954529,0.014894137,0.50367224,0.0062407325,0.00007745768,0.00008714783,0.00026217557,0.35786033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9163394,0.010884704,0.0045066415,0.034135677,0.0015159425,0.00010958916,0.000087769455,0.00030373287,0.03211651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870768,0.008403436,0.00031431788,0.0007598166,0.0021967432,0.0012489253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892442,0.0059882016,0.0006694227,0.0010423663,0.00153534,0.0015204732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01281489,0.000670795,0.00062800694,0.001258456,0.010370702,0.022284128,0.0011955161,0.0055197603,0.008171577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016263388,0.00021689534,0.0005310699,0.0020429057,0.04482697,0.035076607,0.016804766,0.012019931,0.0015036202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040100953,0.0000348551,0.0005117618,0.0002195605,0.0000054741736,0.00024276075,0.088748306,0.00008704527,0.0004912238,0.86106366,0.012951978,0.035603207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001034229,0.00007131656,0.00074519264,0.001234933,0.000008661935,0.00017419858,0.18858717,0.00014205273,0.00063450955,0.24642321,0.56192356,0.000044793353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003696992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004019818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022284128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064789993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069900695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06777245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402942731","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108403","title":"Broadening ecological footprint and biocapacity research: A co-developed research agenda with Canadian stakeholders","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Environmental resource management; Footprint; Geography; Environmental planning; Economics; Ecology; Sustainability; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.40388152238816144,"score_gpt":0.376284357483259,"score_spread":0.027597164904902438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402942731","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103888825,0.025882531,0.025676396,0.7865317,0.001866075,0.0032777009,0.0011926445,0.00019507727,0.051489085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77803814,0.028190572,0.1143195,0.060945783,0.00036159964,0.0029042992,0.0010697993,0.00019658744,0.013973706],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.89108557,0.054692693,0.004065824,0.0059600957,0.02602463,0.018171277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7380218,0.084984325,0.005328833,0.0066196574,0.11859643,0.04644893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1601517,0.001276054,0.0019492584,0.008509046,0.04568067,0.030035838,0.006352265,0.010042944,0.0052639623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09099381,0.001244212,0.0015282037,0.013387074,0.021979604,0.019371236,0.025152171,0.012880931,0.00057047553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029281405,0.0006474951,0.03923751,0.005319824,0.00013992723,0.003860184,0.4489951,0.0021144035,0.0061977035,0.19816463,0.07002936,0.22500111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050955776,0.00015574855,0.013086007,0.0061605857,0.00008837934,0.00040716227,0.5360796,0.0014988215,0.0015597835,0.02795374,0.41268188,0.00027742446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9376919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94475245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7804232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21957676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.64383644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90518034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403148943","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108413","title":"Over 6 billion liters of Canadian milk wasted since 2012","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; McGill University; École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental science; Business","score_opus":0.01667260457679433,"score_gpt":0.20089465106365625,"score_spread":0.1842220464868619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403148943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4862049,0.025621684,0.027429499,0.02051859,0.0006980365,0.00040650187,0.18757586,0.002033473,0.24951151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82421637,0.022022242,0.016572556,0.0019499708,0.0001032762,0.00008942935,0.03490369,0.00020820409,0.099934205],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896836,0.00004442425,0.000024633977,0.00007586613,0.000731736,0.0001549515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933064,0.000034258937,0.00011437391,0.000018364493,0.00045869482,0.000043767068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041234033,0.0005804045,0.00019268111,0.0032941692,0.0014707478,0.0019310298,0.00068062794,0.0004990332,0.009700233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011589791,0.00019536653,0.0006401443,0.0049208663,0.0005013563,0.0007142179,0.0007346306,0.00037771225,0.00081429374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004658762,0.00010239101,0.17413487,0.0024621617,0.00045927652,0.0007013122,0.001512946,0.017636012,0.014591828,0.03908071,0.16111197,0.5877406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023287068,0.00005817102,0.26564085,0.00054017536,0.00022314143,0.0003571746,0.001849345,0.009315551,0.009065343,0.00322493,0.70958155,0.00012044606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.979614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98722965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033564363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033564363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026501054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24352759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404142618","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108444","title":"Extractivist valorization in industrial forestry in the Global North – Elements of an analytical framework and illustration for the cases of Finland and Alberta, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Forestry; Geography; Regional science; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.031799971002626666,"score_gpt":0.24285689442069805,"score_spread":0.2110569234180714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404142618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38668805,0.0023610033,0.013009744,0.005924266,0.000057229758,0.00017869254,0.00013551212,0.000022307266,0.59162325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807045,0.0006936543,0.0033679754,0.000153676,0.000007888869,0.000039375376,0.000041119376,0.000009236295,0.014982619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875593,0.00037757625,0.000019805042,0.000089344336,0.00027301587,0.00048431955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936265,0.00030195722,0.000058002937,0.00003571468,0.0001578138,0.00008381659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015964,0.00037725057,0.00025569857,0.0024337799,0.009681023,0.0065607303,0.0013540062,0.0011703628,0.0033966012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012989782,0.00017377695,0.0005678042,0.003352631,0.011178258,0.0018336052,0.0030662678,0.0012549768,0.000115059476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015871083,0.000017679893,0.0041891485,0.000036822694,0.000008526199,0.00095405936,0.016495064,0.0048566065,0.00015506557,0.965186,0.0009701336,0.0071149003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004624095,0.00003688268,0.033870015,0.00047703108,0.0000817346,0.0008816782,0.21940497,0.035600573,0.00088681973,0.4405179,0.26808578,0.000110391855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8920999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9501248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10790008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066298634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02741187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4810325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404168846","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108430","title":"Biodiversity disclosure in the European finance sector","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Business; Finance; Economics; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.016345520834394327,"score_gpt":0.17997984561716443,"score_spread":0.1636343247827701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404168846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98412746,0.0019252306,0.0005153931,0.0017431019,0.000034846293,0.000028854563,0.00045779438,0.000015641239,0.011151736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979685,0.00047570327,0.00028900726,0.00021070047,0.000020099264,0.000009842889,0.00025776864,0.0000028337897,0.0007656112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98985463,0.0041673775,0.001394197,0.00065441226,0.0031310956,0.0007983635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9328382,0.025445307,0.030702371,0.002951282,0.006532463,0.0015303751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013004318,0.00017252023,0.00024826892,0.0034737613,0.00070184626,0.0033822418,0.000376387,0.0009490566,0.0017818538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04496264,0.00010560626,0.00019231475,0.0038145795,0.0012462954,0.002407915,0.0018960191,0.00045996156,0.00018643025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046667663,0.00027103533,0.7859819,0.0005335707,0.00009840188,0.0011797211,0.014987513,0.0015489627,0.0015158512,0.030854566,0.0069734543,0.1555884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026538206,0.00014496411,0.94213635,0.00070002535,0.00005263377,0.0013862471,0.009164073,0.0022602514,0.0024379194,0.0041274666,0.037496094,0.00006742306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003205933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018229297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013004318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022074245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018881821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06877422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406674094","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108530","title":"Carbon rotation ages and the offset measurement conundrum: An extended review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University; University of Victoria; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Offset (computer science); Rotation (mathematics); Carbon fibers; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geodesy; Geography; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.010948149965235498,"score_gpt":0.21077552230636323,"score_spread":0.19982737234112774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406674094","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015843882,0.99840987,0.000237949,0.00034212464,0.00022957653,0.0000043804393,0.000034120996,0.000003782168,0.000579716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025155446,0.99602425,0.00038329788,0.00032961316,0.00038099592,0.000009221908,0.00006224934,0.000006032368,0.00028873785],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985802,0.00031757393,0.00024285394,0.00035558318,0.00042488347,0.00007897399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98936707,0.0073019722,0.001251798,0.00023579273,0.0016806592,0.00016266649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037870007,0.0010170853,0.001763374,0.0050643575,0.00043945838,0.0026444043,0.0017413235,0.002022082,0.0051429183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01059158,0.0006843249,0.0015593093,0.008861646,0.0010799633,0.0053663366,0.0012042032,0.0021229298,0.0011834579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012246754,0.00006257105,0.0013884227,0.053787243,0.00030466545,0.00014954491,0.00021659675,0.0012897413,0.0003947664,0.02208539,0.023232182,0.8969664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001363552,0.000116282565,0.0035945065,0.043592386,0.0006249924,0.0007847011,0.00025290065,0.00033970704,0.00049695733,0.0084086275,0.94171196,0.000063331194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004873622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004213623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051429183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018351384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042079184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020027816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407630860","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108545","title":"Towards an ecological metaphor for regenerative circular economies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; McGill University","funders":"Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science; Vereniging Trustfonds Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; National Natural Science Foundation of China; C3.ai Digital Transformation Institute; Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Princeton University","keywords":"Metaphor; Ecology; Circular economy; Economics; Geography; Economic geography; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Natural resource economics; Economy; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.017163558131646953,"score_gpt":0.2483203366083795,"score_spread":0.23115677847673255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407630860","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032263625,0.0051276316,0.53301424,0.06095378,0.0018078756,0.00017579044,0.0001579701,0.00027462648,0.36622438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8109609,0.0024901822,0.16358116,0.0041204533,0.00053702056,0.00044997642,0.000086630054,0.0001916554,0.017582046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759597,0.0015236891,0.00007844883,0.00023923845,0.0003876657,0.00017489727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961034,0.0020350786,0.00044463115,0.0005198274,0.00046164074,0.0004354536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005583896,0.00078592275,0.00064335286,0.0027688122,0.0033278782,0.0069858567,0.0016981596,0.0043554083,0.007909301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008125639,0.00039640814,0.0010456991,0.001575888,0.028703313,0.014231126,0.006608812,0.005411862,0.0011033467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011521863,0.0000019703214,0.00000992382,0.000006712954,3.6911527e-7,0.00001150495,0.00015382431,0.00013198674,0.000022992865,0.99918395,0.00015327182,0.0003222207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034384464,0.0000038257076,0.000028436036,0.000021515492,9.570886e-7,0.000038878057,0.0002980334,0.0010081417,0.000036349473,0.98515886,0.013397135,0.000004369058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009214503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008777656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007909301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036552537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027320762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029530823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408126915","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108549","title":"Degrowth in a settler state: climate-just economic transitions and Reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Degrowth; Indigenous; State (computer science); Climate change; Political science; Environmental ethics; Geography; Political economy; Sociology; Ecology; Sustainability; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.004946268947789132,"score_gpt":0.17786697850006197,"score_spread":0.17292070955227284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408126915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96313334,0.0004826793,0.00009434574,0.010094637,0.00003887789,0.000024277479,0.00008689059,0.0000055371015,0.026039353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99441,0.0002542605,0.0000720573,0.00064620556,0.000004458909,0.0000059690083,0.000026079788,0.000004032186,0.00457691],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774617,0.00022729055,0.00003307066,0.00011723717,0.00022657012,0.0016495774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975471,0.00023872966,0.00016310423,0.00007469642,0.0005748846,0.0014014712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012945043,0.00012783388,0.00046264415,0.0008649218,0.025550952,0.0056686015,0.0019882435,0.0016851954,0.0057793777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003427867,0.00018547777,0.00032859118,0.002007092,0.0074506956,0.0015197158,0.0048185983,0.0033210765,0.00011388431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030019024,0.0003329166,0.21365137,0.0002128759,0.00012576752,0.0034336627,0.5279408,0.0014687324,0.001108908,0.15975076,0.021184513,0.07048941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031640022,0.000044625453,0.20690472,0.00018161791,0.00004941345,0.00022679931,0.7163984,0.00067615614,0.00017735154,0.0058017005,0.069442116,0.00006544415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07309106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07309106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13512763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5303153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408348878","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108601","title":"Assessing the nexus between industrialization and inclusive green growth in Africa. The critical role of energy efficiency","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic Growth and Development","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Industrialisation; Green growth; Inclusive growth; Economics; Natural resource economics; Inclusive development; Development economics; Economic growth; Sustainable development; Poverty; Ecology; Biology; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.021882405420952496,"score_gpt":0.2580920472914752,"score_spread":0.23620964187052274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408348878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897668,0.0009373076,0.0008784703,0.0009186267,0.000008697897,0.000013813834,0.00012161015,0.0000024709461,0.0073521296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992061,0.00034750497,0.00018125994,0.00001589841,0.0000034856325,0.000005315391,0.00003256637,0.0000013292482,0.0002065309],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994646,0.0002536002,0.000014247358,0.000037164486,0.000046346267,0.00018402467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624735,0.0024544904,0.0007247185,0.000060795086,0.00025327905,0.00025935832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001571255,0.0004112312,0.00021984562,0.0012133423,0.00046129685,0.001408065,0.00029474712,0.00044513206,0.0028809877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071793483,0.00013457533,0.00028471468,0.0020279912,0.0013357424,0.0026241478,0.0021583657,0.00095976057,0.00014126042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006969936,0.00029993049,0.80543655,0.00035490762,0.0003909614,0.0010648955,0.0024549412,0.026007973,0.0019300025,0.08784327,0.0014963609,0.072023146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029122148,0.00035909563,0.8829323,0.00035684233,0.00027649463,0.00028033633,0.018203277,0.027341375,0.0022453177,0.061408967,0.006535955,0.000030939318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015103786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02336496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015103786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001618834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019568475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03003174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413119615","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108740","title":"Accepting and implementing transport pricing policies for climate: A review of evidence and research gaps","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Natural resource economics; Business; Public economics; Environmental economics","score_opus":0.12067978094051017,"score_gpt":0.389571847392505,"score_spread":0.2688920664519948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413119615","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019538251,0.9837456,0.0004883357,0.011068493,0.0004968911,0.000038255184,0.00019438355,0.00000718782,0.0020070623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020233396,0.97460043,0.0009079925,0.0033681428,0.0005927838,0.000059090737,0.00013458001,0.000011530802,0.000091946866],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834911,0.0064314245,0.0039004877,0.0016638589,0.0035822135,0.00093089923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76282346,0.20522411,0.014758961,0.0020159502,0.013658415,0.0015190792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0334001,0.0013547202,0.003156019,0.005119584,0.0010924814,0.007826997,0.004120515,0.0051798136,0.0057201358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12589177,0.0010101084,0.0032927978,0.008833797,0.0033044964,0.007457004,0.002613597,0.00656942,0.0006210169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006612069,0.0004711973,0.011250395,0.19999924,0.0032619778,0.00013520851,0.00080350664,0.0028514033,0.00022431326,0.026445549,0.016165983,0.73773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004129852,0.00051210285,0.032343917,0.60633016,0.010841557,0.0005611729,0.0040611494,0.0018650063,0.0012233361,0.039456427,0.30216685,0.00022539165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018803507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027060702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0334001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071010427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021910187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17663872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413768606","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108742","title":"A new measure of climate transition risk based on distance to a global emission factor frontier","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Measure (data warehouse); Climate change; Climatology; Environmental science; Economics; Natural resource economics; Geography; Geology; Computer science; Oceanography","score_opus":0.037126719336219756,"score_gpt":0.24687686080771065,"score_spread":0.2097501414714909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413768606","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27690172,0.0028953603,0.69335115,0.00199657,0.00053043803,0.00007439472,0.0014136396,0.00026216102,0.02257457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9441002,0.0008562142,0.050056845,0.00018934501,0.00053041324,0.000063785184,0.0007392817,0.000059983468,0.0034039356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896586,0.0002598115,0.00008380729,0.00026509986,0.00034211198,0.000083312734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923822,0.003616403,0.0019238322,0.0006579377,0.00082091487,0.00059866905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017504719,0.0006866169,0.00080434454,0.0036256278,0.00044291667,0.003246388,0.0012419896,0.001427103,0.003208056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009407735,0.00021257844,0.00070450164,0.0023865916,0.0013386224,0.0056900927,0.0021389825,0.0020458915,0.00029807692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004082823,0.00035433588,0.08107602,0.0003016752,0.00078019605,0.0004231882,0.0005126204,0.23990098,0.0057319757,0.547987,0.0079838075,0.11454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058433914,0.00037819057,0.046905383,0.000110027984,0.00018983374,0.00056758296,0.00037355945,0.5808379,0.0020557344,0.35346264,0.014883106,0.00017766704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012708077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013736803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036256278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014222168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004617564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010732055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413805986","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108768","title":"Labour dynamics, harvest cost and sharing behaviour in an Inuit mixed economy: How to adapt to a changing socio-ecological system?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Nunavut; Carleton University","funders":"Queen's University; Polar Knowledge Canada; Genome Canada; Carleton University","keywords":"Sharing economy; Dynamics (music); Ecology; System dynamics; Economics; Geography; Economy; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.03734052232071181,"score_gpt":0.3268610162680441,"score_spread":0.28952049394733226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413805986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991197,0.00004320454,0.000027857413,0.00027781495,0.000001621222,0.0000031032423,0.000011043304,4.827534e-7,0.00051516714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961686,0.00005997234,0.000050048828,0.000036986912,0.0000020942805,0.0000036051204,0.000009747369,6.276565e-7,0.00021992583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997334,0.000081941296,0.000009888886,0.000025129539,0.000025876125,0.00012378868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950695,0.00010926006,0.00014131969,0.000019392515,0.000040459858,0.00018251728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005891998,0.00012871345,0.00019982475,0.00042058065,0.0015248364,0.0015570512,0.0006027598,0.00046101047,0.0019529215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017879409,0.00015109495,0.000134869,0.00047221594,0.0011516765,0.00097569526,0.0010475662,0.00037572824,0.0001397413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010499754,0.0002583665,0.9401694,0.000057330974,0.000044560034,0.00055882894,0.041220006,0.0002858504,0.0014073377,0.0013823091,0.00030805272,0.014203005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022593829,0.000052134877,0.9245198,0.000032316315,0.000008028271,0.000087773,0.073699854,0.0005476665,0.00004714762,0.00041736988,0.0005760745,0.000009584138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11445822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31057844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8855418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015625554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012897938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22758394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414031877","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108782","title":"Climate shocks and banking sector stability: Evidence from El Niño southern oscillation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Oscillation (cell signaling); Economics; Financial stability; El Niño Southern Oscillation; Southern oscillation; Climate change; Natural resource economics; Monetary economics; Climatology; Financial system; Geology; Oceanography; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04304587067494471,"score_gpt":0.23352305587578634,"score_spread":0.19047718520084161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414031877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945985,0.0010138538,0.00007030899,0.001715772,0.00003360589,0.000003021653,0.0007350233,0.0000056032463,0.0018243862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972312,0.0013358501,0.000022588232,0.00014172321,0.000056885896,0.000002195439,0.0008303996,0.0000028127988,0.00037642624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979216,0.00006107294,0.000020517655,0.0000383298,0.000032592587,0.000055406337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993983,0.002107699,0.0024717143,0.00023674556,0.000558945,0.0006419144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010514646,0.0001935528,0.00029777075,0.0006881816,0.00046904266,0.0015463553,0.00036300288,0.0007434467,0.003370054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049646967,0.00018926193,0.00030889356,0.002197551,0.00084954675,0.00074360153,0.00091418717,0.0008078114,0.00028981746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081252464,0.00013297652,0.9870525,0.000060941267,0.00024107427,0.00021916743,0.00042986713,0.0013336471,0.0002848818,0.00090930524,0.0023064879,0.0062166704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036058584,0.000038410933,0.9958366,0.000025489824,0.00008477337,0.00003122465,0.0010893793,0.00067767524,0.00007092571,0.00067518384,0.0014274109,0.0000068900117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04942434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059380088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04942434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046709686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060359086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09827334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415823959","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108842","title":"Fixed capital and growth imperatives: Is commercial aviation trapped in a treadmill?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Aviation; Profitability index; Capital (architecture); Fixed cost; Investment (military); Commercial aviation; Fixed asset; Fixed capital","score_opus":0.008525398701143041,"score_gpt":0.2224778743092361,"score_spread":0.21395247560809305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415823959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49110374,0.005918228,0.047254525,0.13305858,0.00037378658,0.000060294948,0.00039165028,0.00019419173,0.321645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99583936,0.00060423085,0.0007554186,0.0006212043,0.000051306695,0.000013724407,0.00003483112,0.000010492344,0.002069452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947554,0.00016262804,0.000019664307,0.00011191895,0.00008925851,0.00014097871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765116,0.0010148584,0.00048624756,0.00012910736,0.00037660004,0.00034187848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011393239,0.0002773942,0.00020943591,0.0008018043,0.0011510783,0.004930591,0.0006752148,0.001832547,0.0075158007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038210573,0.00015372677,0.00029713323,0.00066999445,0.0075006313,0.007450446,0.0020524764,0.0023373475,0.0004486097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003177092,0.000028422912,0.00462731,0.00004837594,0.0000068401555,0.00014876587,0.0009423324,0.0021447774,0.00019638365,0.9788159,0.0030171133,0.009991893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013822096,0.00002515529,0.004962151,0.00012739505,0.000009345713,0.00009789662,0.0036963965,0.008588906,0.00033596586,0.96233225,0.019786527,0.000024248313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004623701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032491356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075158007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037842712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017465558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02745694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415885517","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108843","title":"Resource regimes and the success of local renewable energy projects","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Bundesamt für Energie","keywords":"Renewable energy; Property rights; Resource (disambiguation); Politics; Renewable resource; Energy policy; Revenue; Democracy","score_opus":0.011932539868038494,"score_gpt":0.250019445764464,"score_spread":0.2380869058964255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415885517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812065,0.00004966592,0.00024482142,0.0001276929,0.0000018297724,0.000014044927,0.000013072797,0.0000042002266,0.0183382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994925,0.000020662408,0.000035735808,0.0000036453268,0.0000012607732,0.0000054869474,0.000006148091,0.0000010836967,0.00043335656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968137,0.0017110242,0.00017416083,0.00016186919,0.00047300349,0.0006661725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98769695,0.004585452,0.0048350687,0.00074595417,0.0009274717,0.0012090572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032868627,0.00008782166,0.0002159144,0.001024503,0.0010518398,0.0029569142,0.0004353715,0.0005085408,0.0055773277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0139652295,0.00011780592,0.00024447558,0.0010373218,0.002649219,0.0009911432,0.0028601969,0.00068166695,0.00038443608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029396176,0.00076918706,0.8627688,0.00012509816,0.00016037757,0.001383329,0.013249207,0.007417669,0.0022235145,0.052331276,0.0006241364,0.058653526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042829186,0.0005558346,0.92917794,0.00014736602,0.00006615515,0.00049921696,0.043005843,0.0039716437,0.0012422838,0.010303115,0.010944016,0.000043851753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021114594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004523516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055773277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013879336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008446573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018658042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417209239","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108878","title":"Ethical trade-offs in fast fashion: Exploring social, environmental, and health dimensions in clothing consumption","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; University of Alberta","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Sustainability; Clothing; Purchasing; Consumption (sociology); Ranking (information retrieval); Sustainable consumption","score_opus":0.21919370596077764,"score_gpt":0.2777004952968769,"score_spread":0.05850678933609926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417209239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990914,0.00001441073,0.00020004199,0.000016290454,6.903416e-7,0.0000066490666,0.000013447337,7.285823e-7,0.00065619586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960095,0.00000976982,0.0001708548,0.000007582788,0.0000010696592,0.0000071262034,0.000024696874,5.643071e-7,0.00017740928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985239,0.00086887414,0.00007281053,0.0001317247,0.00023324136,0.00016951881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911947,0.005577613,0.0020493164,0.0004608373,0.00025152415,0.00046584502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025616398,0.00026487675,0.00023198791,0.000701544,0.00039681417,0.0013646504,0.00016667724,0.000713182,0.0029647425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00611481,0.0001923241,0.00070423685,0.00044363824,0.0012610963,0.0007515799,0.000591363,0.00059564516,0.00018179594],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001185289,0.0020636963,0.97298133,0.000058160393,0.0001707609,0.00025189383,0.0035827635,0.0025726394,0.0045642713,0.00171438,0.00010900707,0.010745903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002703182,0.000727013,0.99010414,0.000011811839,0.000038996008,0.000094641226,0.0032873543,0.002988045,0.0007078273,0.0016798131,0.00030904403,0.000024377236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020417017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003316219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029647425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007976259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026619728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0135474205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417360022","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109127","title":"Ecological and Economic Impacts of Ocean Deoxygenation on Pacific Halibut Fisheries: A Multidisciplinary Assessment of Projected Losses","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Halibut; Economic impact analysis; Biomass (ecology); Fishing; Overfishing; Biogeochemical cycle; Exclusive economic zone; Marine ecosystem; Abundance (ecology)","score_opus":0.01359875466910911,"score_gpt":0.25728167024402515,"score_spread":0.24368291557491603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417360022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901389,0.00060759,0.0021783903,0.001145381,0.000014040903,0.00002500938,0.0011462277,0.000028338907,0.004716112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969746,0.000570221,0.0010796083,0.00008013321,0.000005490439,0.000021680798,0.0004823576,0.0000047239987,0.0007812602],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972314,0.00008056492,0.00001465996,0.000032840057,0.00008098829,0.00006771195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995931,0.00007156424,0.000103151906,0.000016008331,0.00013027455,0.00008591993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001021913,0.0008520765,0.00028394346,0.0010685968,0.0006422685,0.0016662405,0.00066481787,0.00057205756,0.0012197556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011632788,0.00030746567,0.00083190866,0.0010590808,0.0004876911,0.0009859303,0.0012046049,0.0005450044,0.00008209144],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022038662,0.00013624944,0.45409322,0.00017118282,0.0007869125,0.001017021,0.00034227606,0.50766,0.0029812069,0.0038367917,0.0018305585,0.026924292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018955712,0.00023654394,0.40799078,0.0001382557,0.00028870176,0.00020571904,0.002539883,0.57937866,0.0012871919,0.004300077,0.003525895,0.00008936646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2370511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27576423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2370511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051439917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026811946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47134262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}