{"meta":{"query_hash":"48461d95ffd3","filters":{"venue":"Economic Inquiry"},"cohort_total":148,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":148,"exported":148,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/48461d95ffd3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Economic+Inquiry"},"results":[{"id":"W1503863102","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12177","title":"TRADE IN POLARIZED AMERICA: THE BORDER EFFECT BETWEEN RED STATES AND BLUE STATES","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Border effect; Endogeneity; Economics; Politics; International economics; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030788490024157164,"score_gpt":0.24212102998782237,"score_spread":0.2113325399636652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503863102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991915,0.00034856977,0.0007277147,0.00043352874,0.00002056541,0.0000046277537,0.00019598508,0.00000901619,0.0063448832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889946,0.00013418015,0.00016098056,0.000096286996,0.000015746597,0.000004128962,0.0001953077,0.0000029598891,0.0004910035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999537,0.0001692688,0.000022145543,0.00011018439,0.000051101466,0.000110248715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741554,0.00094788475,0.0011924499,0.0001342968,0.00013061606,0.00017909425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006919193,0.00013482606,0.00031686013,0.00076548086,0.00073999626,0.0017463546,0.0002371638,0.00042441546,0.004638179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021730794,0.00010451826,0.00043757271,0.0013730361,0.0012179699,0.0008035953,0.0014876357,0.0007327739,0.00023826462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002924276,0.00012266991,0.94801563,0.000059053546,0.0002405405,0.000498818,0.0018999208,0.0031656257,0.00064219296,0.026499495,0.0032111409,0.015352454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005291484,0.00013355938,0.96150434,0.00015016684,0.000379613,0.00029792587,0.008140017,0.0068595232,0.0008982051,0.012214074,0.009342515,0.000027206785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012959287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013984237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012959287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050975283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028340874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025767744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528418513","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12093","title":"NEW MEASURES OF THE COSTS OF UNEMPLOYMENT: EVIDENCE FROM THE SUBJECTIVE WELL‐BEING OF 3.3 MILLION AMERICANS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Economics; Labour economics; Population; Demographic economics; Percentage point; Point (geometry); Social security; Rest (music); Macroeconomics; Demography; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06897608002079024,"score_gpt":0.32639806919330644,"score_spread":0.2574219891725162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528418513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99296653,0.00094603916,0.00029793382,0.00047325398,0.000021942851,0.000020819183,0.0035354712,0.0000041609787,0.0017338454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656373,0.0003606704,0.00017980755,0.00008840152,0.000033348308,0.000030959076,0.002479251,0.00000205946,0.00026175074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876165,0.0007053918,0.00011303751,0.00012669625,0.00020546307,0.00008774185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97810364,0.0077034263,0.010110702,0.001132938,0.0016374824,0.0013118042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028526075,0.00036545115,0.00034326187,0.0022366503,0.0005187799,0.001134531,0.000461713,0.00069753866,0.0026131656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010815928,0.0002632983,0.0007110518,0.0036990615,0.00062500767,0.0007228543,0.0012296787,0.0010508407,0.000329488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012143441,0.00011010934,0.99399465,0.00003881847,0.0002040079,0.000017761053,0.00020499318,0.00027829024,0.00003409958,0.00029139436,0.0007651085,0.0039393636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081667,0.0000401909,0.99864966,0.000014429148,0.000051959774,0.0000126832365,0.00032935434,0.00027828684,0.000022354228,0.00013096503,0.00045612646,0.0000057783254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018139428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026302276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018139428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005611083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032865067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036067665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564598428","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00138.x","title":"ON THE EFFICIENCY OF AC/DC: BON SCOTT VERSUS BRIAN JOHNSON","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Art History and Market Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.07841218870617325,"score_gpt":0.2697392696433525,"score_spread":0.19132708093717923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564598428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023446536,0.022109402,0.023564637,0.1556103,0.0019232499,0.000073545576,0.00028941437,0.00014360373,0.77283937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7468266,0.011776393,0.012015662,0.012844579,0.0032442193,0.000118161224,0.00014631484,0.0008032058,0.21222498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570113,0.0017431453,0.00012563022,0.00042941424,0.001525561,0.00047508304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801609,0.013898275,0.00050232705,0.0016237831,0.0033391286,0.00047552295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068530915,0.000512327,0.0012214693,0.0032736717,0.004087377,0.008424935,0.0014284193,0.003817568,0.034806862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03010929,0.0003656906,0.0005239697,0.0043002805,0.010292939,0.009549941,0.002542574,0.0039649885,0.0042718146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053421896,0.000025250389,0.0002266916,0.00004921108,0.0000089384375,0.000016992724,0.00016972798,0.00051340536,0.000042568987,0.94041795,0.03696835,0.021507459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028852772,0.000011214528,0.0005398575,0.0001407745,0.000027799802,0.000037171845,0.0007701314,0.0027574366,0.00050733733,0.8599845,0.13517004,0.000024868257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026795344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018009903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034806862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006046046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003991696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116440594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1818952397","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12193","title":"EUCLIDEAN FAIRNESS AND EFFICIENCY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ptolemy's table of chords; Fair division; Virtue; Heaven; Judaism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Euclidean geometry; History; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Classics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Theology; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09721083954176153,"score_gpt":0.25051584269355365,"score_spread":0.15330500315179213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1818952397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058039468,0.010165726,0.29819262,0.010360133,0.0009927641,0.000114735834,0.00090743654,0.0003462395,0.62088084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89267546,0.0031758912,0.040061634,0.0010250431,0.0010607573,0.00021055125,0.00046209584,0.00019656404,0.06113193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945515,0.0024394048,0.0002972746,0.0009973109,0.0010948983,0.0006196639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99414766,0.0027608573,0.00048014335,0.0012269072,0.001006765,0.00037771676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038441338,0.0006550496,0.00094207906,0.0015971732,0.002521976,0.0061416305,0.0010250595,0.00151218,0.013085643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010909606,0.00024310882,0.0010248818,0.0015888852,0.0067297905,0.005229172,0.0034896568,0.0019203959,0.0021737423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007911762,0.000002975956,0.000079416175,0.000011914284,0.0000051610627,0.000006492069,0.0000423477,0.0009811575,0.000036509064,0.9950493,0.0009616418,0.0028152433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072811263,0.000006999974,0.00013527018,0.000009769648,0.000002631929,0.000014347981,0.000025056685,0.0016341084,0.00007122468,0.9886231,0.009465722,0.0000044939416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002746491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001660736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013085643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005045785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019208028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043775797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1835322988","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12431","title":"DOES LIMITED PUNISHMENT LIMIT THE SCOPE FOR CROSS RETALIATION?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Economics; Incentive; Limit (mathematics); Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14671205230194878,"score_gpt":0.3042809809666605,"score_spread":0.15756892866471173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1835322988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44811726,0.0023320613,0.21196072,0.012831599,0.00034471124,0.00029892262,0.00024577792,0.0003486133,0.32352027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98958826,0.0002987907,0.00441226,0.001000447,0.00011400836,0.00009213653,0.000018741892,0.000027365008,0.004448142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916549,0.003099051,0.00065555813,0.0016162064,0.0016751259,0.0012992108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95240533,0.02246127,0.015082848,0.006446721,0.0023757915,0.0012279652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008785821,0.00049660745,0.00093893294,0.0008794051,0.0013383279,0.004671508,0.0025824034,0.0041070436,0.008821823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045222532,0.0005230672,0.0007530941,0.00039674251,0.0051975697,0.0068423036,0.0029645676,0.0037185804,0.0014471277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001472279,0.00023308757,0.013130705,0.00020517204,0.00012921121,0.0005882952,0.0008659639,0.01482863,0.0034858382,0.914438,0.003405503,0.048542425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020579906,0.00049740745,0.014923441,0.0005510527,0.00016618376,0.0012817881,0.0014499257,0.035562843,0.004810698,0.9109464,0.02948221,0.00012211764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011079647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012436155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008821823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013345318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018200392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046464384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965187851","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00152.x","title":"TACIT COLLUSION IN AUCTIONS AND CONDITIONS FOR ITS FACILITATION AND PREVENTION: EQUILIBRIUM SELECTION IN LABORATORY EXPERIMENTAL MARKETS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit collusion; Collusion; Common value auction; Microeconomics; Economics; Facilitation; Competition (biology); Preference; Selection (genetic algorithm); Industrial organization; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Ecology; Management","score_opus":0.08250359811943878,"score_gpt":0.4088266828119677,"score_spread":0.3263230846925289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965187851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95967925,0.000091297574,0.03382479,0.00024978525,0.000014461625,0.00016644174,0.00002755028,0.000050267452,0.005896192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99485403,0.00003982299,0.004582287,0.000029037172,0.000005968075,0.00014071104,0.000010772595,0.000006470511,0.0003308314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400324,0.0041531916,0.0002519738,0.00049788173,0.000651195,0.0004425795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9374583,0.046175346,0.009671816,0.0038884026,0.001249912,0.0015561755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008997245,0.00045418905,0.0009833074,0.00054508855,0.00077794853,0.002383866,0.0010585549,0.0010618208,0.0038653442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05502626,0.0005994415,0.00047714013,0.00036512347,0.0028737355,0.0026764148,0.0016245039,0.0012772329,0.00030982026],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008016199,0.007838039,0.04606783,0.0008317129,0.0005592714,0.0012499153,0.0045498526,0.10594685,0.067569494,0.68542165,0.0025063644,0.06944283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00380735,0.006150514,0.017504187,0.00011609834,0.00019733809,0.00058258366,0.0023201008,0.4580057,0.023424933,0.4850762,0.0025998175,0.00021521848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005899663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057908904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008997245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096411305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013363735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047582567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965824921","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12095","title":"HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTION AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Lesbian; Production (economics); Value (mathematics); Sexual orientation; Labour economics; Census; Household income; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Geography; Sociology; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.04398247597411921,"score_gpt":0.28573877122771096,"score_spread":0.24175629525359177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965824921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51304114,0.0029019818,0.0042831325,0.0013577249,0.00009007363,0.0006294678,0.37829784,0.00019460097,0.099204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89808923,0.0033945332,0.0020847798,0.0000903976,0.000026262907,0.00020808617,0.07020981,0.000022929667,0.025873927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935716,0.00006882793,0.000027872218,0.00005006379,0.00031532155,0.00018071441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983924,0.0002902326,0.0004172746,0.00011095738,0.0005816935,0.00020745667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004329964,0.00032577047,0.00031588803,0.0023474211,0.00083726074,0.0013524541,0.0005323539,0.0002131776,0.011939293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00368202,0.00015398601,0.0004413608,0.0073110824,0.00054578594,0.00040557652,0.00056204764,0.00047665217,0.0010864954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094253664,0.00004585949,0.89844227,0.00020363006,0.0001898863,0.0003007489,0.0010524363,0.010767439,0.00018076721,0.01668468,0.027564894,0.04447311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010036034,0.000019723027,0.93635625,0.00010078961,0.000032934393,0.00015927466,0.0018632144,0.004715529,0.00020456774,0.0016110836,0.054901887,0.000024694209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92577136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9268245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92577136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011513619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007525318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14933151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976946851","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00115.x","title":"CORPORATE PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH: CHAMPIONS, LEADERS, AND LAGGARDS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Economics; Debt; Financial distress; Sample (material); Monetary economics; Large sample; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics; Financial system","score_opus":0.10888059067194618,"score_gpt":0.25312861868610353,"score_spread":0.14424802801415737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976946851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983417,0.00031485848,0.00003544628,0.00021423989,0.000005866302,0.0000022453344,0.00013338077,0.0000019915888,0.00095033925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936014,0.00008647667,0.000012272067,0.0000149439875,0.000012108289,0.0000011232269,0.0001015787,7.206767e-7,0.00041057286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967897,0.000045744193,0.000019196212,0.00005684146,0.00006972044,0.00012960551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925006,0.0015730588,0.0037329106,0.00015910514,0.0005633246,0.0014710197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010536857,0.000107973654,0.00020768518,0.0019291367,0.0003799787,0.0013528257,0.00024252378,0.0003752334,0.0032955864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060579153,0.00009235242,0.00009256834,0.0015764296,0.0006753754,0.0014512477,0.0008968107,0.00046858014,0.0005766274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013352357,0.000036069847,0.9875759,0.000014537736,0.000011177253,0.00014864992,0.0010758619,0.00012995966,0.0001556289,0.00044618224,0.000666401,0.009605994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006047751,0.00005824694,0.99650264,0.000015691267,0.0000048066513,0.000085534215,0.0018531603,0.00026018472,0.000078395,0.00031547723,0.0008151841,0.000004662767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00527736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00924167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00527736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045637248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031550459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011024892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983492493","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00142.x","title":"PRESERVATION OF TRADE SECRETS AND MULTINATIONAL WAGE PREMIA","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Incentive; Wage; Competition (biology); Order (exchange); Economics; Business; Labour economics; Corporation; International trade; Industrial organization; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.07754312881443343,"score_gpt":0.2424374414704893,"score_spread":0.16489431265605586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983492493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97626853,0.00024773463,0.0064441734,0.0006137338,0.000008905515,0.000015739186,0.00006397348,0.000015184271,0.016322037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990864,0.0000519172,0.00028536818,0.000016315375,0.000005735056,0.0000024224773,0.000011814214,0.0000012304836,0.0005388119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954236,0.00013044957,0.000042000724,0.00007851836,0.00006987118,0.00013688805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98812604,0.0035134014,0.0065331412,0.0009940772,0.00039788673,0.00043539715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017187226,0.00015346447,0.00031435702,0.00037221875,0.00058401446,0.0018697956,0.00032328267,0.00063407805,0.0052181873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011096036,0.00014663514,0.00018454634,0.0005626356,0.0017371931,0.0012983141,0.0007008059,0.0007849127,0.00029802322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000750962,0.00043318403,0.271568,0.00017555745,0.00012751423,0.0008595534,0.0014411857,0.026567228,0.008604896,0.6129718,0.0022577834,0.074242435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024837133,0.00053162983,0.27648923,0.00012548707,0.000119150885,0.0008944177,0.0036563724,0.05930054,0.0072605745,0.6443403,0.00695899,0.00007504167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001265275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015666926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052181873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084939983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006200301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017456532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984392691","doi":"10.1093/ei/cbj010","title":"THE EFFECTS OF DISCRETIONARY FEDERAL SPENDING ON PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION RESULTS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Per capita; Parliament; Government spending; Economics; Percentage point; Political science; Politics; Public economics; Law; Market economy; Demography; Finance; Welfare","score_opus":0.035224099669017905,"score_gpt":0.34380929711510827,"score_spread":0.30858519744609036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984392691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9243132,0.0018370986,0.0014695858,0.002274069,0.00007766042,0.00009286743,0.0051687355,0.00013297674,0.06463375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630827,0.00018601524,0.00016765602,0.000054997854,0.000017605245,0.000012911068,0.0006219376,0.000012972298,0.0026176677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98951703,0.004640608,0.0004949486,0.0006108088,0.0022498104,0.0024866879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9052494,0.069850765,0.012697908,0.003982432,0.0058985855,0.0023208573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011240723,0.00041392058,0.0007693204,0.0020294704,0.0010355613,0.0032165546,0.0007785503,0.00047795023,0.018819714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055874836,0.00024078217,0.0009960595,0.0034055095,0.0016019875,0.000824523,0.0013572566,0.001394715,0.0013999369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037153452,0.00045787037,0.834652,0.00050836755,0.0013636485,0.00033891344,0.0013198297,0.026522456,0.0015477351,0.037288886,0.012592319,0.079692766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068289606,0.00021388067,0.9836932,0.00005841465,0.0003229203,0.00004585058,0.00072822033,0.0048865834,0.0013214875,0.0046754144,0.003947973,0.00003780518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2443459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33391222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2443459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007369801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045314333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4858473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985189455","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00055.x","title":"CURBSIDE RECYCLING IN THE PRESENCE OF ALTERNATIVES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cannibalization; Economics; Marginal cost; Drop out; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.18225934101939914,"score_gpt":0.28821706857653995,"score_spread":0.10595772755714081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985189455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903025,0.00027182393,0.0026210065,0.00022916823,0.000007095872,0.000053318305,0.0002422827,0.000017126553,0.0062556537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875486,0.00008851126,0.0004912319,0.000014513698,0.0000047909416,0.000014263144,0.000091113,0.0000024653446,0.0005382205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944733,0.0022651185,0.0004912088,0.00064311357,0.0012156352,0.0009117529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87260276,0.08519776,0.032477736,0.004278015,0.003846217,0.0015974968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005957648,0.00049282296,0.0009248511,0.0018310534,0.00048688825,0.0035380493,0.0010829639,0.0015114602,0.012632773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07209418,0.00030531862,0.0007229573,0.0031593118,0.0013680357,0.0039022444,0.0020670374,0.0015070258,0.0005366471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061547616,0.0027051873,0.59717584,0.00084797223,0.00089707796,0.0013086771,0.0007945405,0.2288284,0.0039948556,0.052120384,0.001991067,0.10318135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042638587,0.004322754,0.5606339,0.00029148956,0.0010664833,0.00095482636,0.0050640586,0.32258588,0.005384831,0.090453826,0.008578757,0.00023685553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006185277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053432635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012632773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020251859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079427694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042260885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986061851","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00415.x","title":"VANISHING LEADERSHIP AND DECLINING RECIPROCITY IN A SEQUENTIAL CONTRIBUTION EXPERIMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Sequence (biology); Economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.29409641692956623,"score_gpt":0.38661403799214994,"score_spread":0.09251762106258371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986061851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927921,0.00003209688,0.0034750013,0.00026310544,0.000023081067,0.000076292235,0.000050151953,0.00003341293,0.0032547924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955042,0.000028676364,0.003054252,0.00011695767,0.00001961629,0.00016678106,0.000028305214,0.000008895613,0.0010723477],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99429023,0.003802978,0.00026534533,0.00059682154,0.00073547446,0.00030913984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95296144,0.028557332,0.008571121,0.0061447853,0.00080656906,0.0029586637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008725557,0.00076027855,0.00096712325,0.00045473056,0.00057047495,0.0010115553,0.0008758807,0.001042741,0.0063175303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034186125,0.00041487892,0.00033048558,0.00034122102,0.002089484,0.001067138,0.0014573296,0.0015064669,0.0005674319],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08138997,0.038060762,0.10878942,0.0018644503,0.0011489975,0.0017837753,0.0067603206,0.066841945,0.38295648,0.123278074,0.00525227,0.18187349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018645229,0.08882043,0.21230657,0.00023075398,0.0007072943,0.0014655248,0.001953394,0.23653066,0.06994235,0.36027974,0.008700242,0.0004177964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046918914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000537941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008725557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006843503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082062354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046145678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004021232","doi":"10.1093/ei/39.4.499","title":"Understanding Investment Irreversibility in General Equilibrium","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; General equilibrium theory; Portfolio; Elasticity of substitution; Investment (military); Consumption (sociology); Microeconomics; Capital market imperfections; Capital (architecture); Elasticity of intertemporal substitution; Monetary economics; Econometrics; Capital market; Financial economics; Production (economics); Finance","score_opus":0.2359428366144808,"score_gpt":0.2736977194107559,"score_spread":0.03775488279627509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004021232","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32063362,0.005113115,0.4662523,0.011810035,0.00019341988,0.00010776841,0.00035766477,0.0003075041,0.19522457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97866195,0.0021393101,0.009935589,0.0003058897,0.00017486242,0.000085829925,0.00008287833,0.00003827881,0.008575339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992429,0.00021661237,0.000027092265,0.00015570983,0.00014302466,0.0002146948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980294,0.00097219326,0.0003921432,0.00027229715,0.00017729327,0.00015670148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016012707,0.00060818694,0.00094176497,0.00081929873,0.0007459387,0.0024875149,0.0014352772,0.0018577318,0.0060975733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005224002,0.0005258286,0.0010837632,0.0007154829,0.0028079348,0.005736939,0.0019530226,0.0017352046,0.0005376114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011172,0.000019494184,0.00047699237,0.00002954539,0.000015225569,0.000093335366,0.00009544684,0.039232526,0.00033751084,0.9573238,0.00049479946,0.0018700394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075317917,0.000009309804,0.00021260571,0.000007944929,0.0000051771667,0.000033104163,0.000028293003,0.052011512,0.000048955208,0.9465893,0.0010400438,0.000006173578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005366296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027081063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060975733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025907352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010702952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020398438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017281598","doi":"10.1093/ei/cbj030","title":"No‐Fault Divorce and the Compression of Marriage Ages","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Variance (accounting); Demographic economics; Standard deviation; Demography; Econometrics; Statistics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01869262530714916,"score_gpt":0.2741309371869698,"score_spread":0.25543831187982063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017281598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972606,0.00038123043,0.0002694036,0.00039093243,0.000006185151,0.000002764177,0.0002575516,0.00000824283,0.0014229871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995751,0.00008057004,0.000017854789,0.000013599241,0.000008408795,6.5807586e-7,0.00011369112,0.0000013753621,0.00018874943],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992387,0.00021098695,0.000056822068,0.000171928,0.00016562546,0.00015602965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719133,0.011727379,0.013479201,0.0011594505,0.0007304602,0.0009902004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012600397,0.00010482748,0.000283278,0.0010722214,0.0004193054,0.0013109572,0.00056242786,0.00049535156,0.005649551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025085405,0.00018866555,0.00023353162,0.0013932184,0.0012255715,0.0008372567,0.0009800442,0.000811221,0.00052333006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021054714,0.00005649273,0.97269946,0.000020499881,0.00008329019,0.0002103687,0.0007567652,0.003626556,0.000364704,0.0065530376,0.00075364776,0.014664732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014196729,0.00007643242,0.9901361,0.000010024672,0.00003130203,0.0001340046,0.000516877,0.0052541336,0.0002867844,0.0027049726,0.0008222453,0.000013070311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010288296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007192375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010288296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011105514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028761703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02045685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017887093","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12363","title":"REGIONAL AND SECTORAL EVIDENCE OF THE MACROECONOMIC EFFECTS OF LABOR REALLOCATION: A PANEL DATA ANALYSIS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Unemployment; Panel data; Econometrics; Dispersion (optics); Relevance (law); Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.10694667619376604,"score_gpt":0.2757402710482968,"score_spread":0.16879359485453077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017887093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947901,0.00039924824,0.00093715504,0.0002017013,0.000006919204,0.000004765283,0.0021872753,0.000019500485,0.0014534208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979755,0.00015495555,0.00022966208,0.000027543985,0.000010859208,0.000003847704,0.0013725761,0.000004508799,0.0002205107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947673,0.0002723591,0.000029374356,0.00011012942,0.00004287493,0.000068527144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959416,0.0018036335,0.0012931593,0.000478712,0.00030760322,0.00017527054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011772834,0.0001343124,0.0003757872,0.00073726167,0.00021052385,0.000549629,0.00029752016,0.00033332768,0.0027418009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035239155,0.0001773069,0.0004975752,0.0018503439,0.00021664277,0.00033591266,0.00060412986,0.00042919395,0.00047616783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033196382,0.00008683603,0.96045715,0.00007508863,0.0008635329,0.00020060048,0.00049665745,0.015068981,0.001087762,0.0011113108,0.0035300383,0.01669005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013514391,0.0000662911,0.9866831,0.000021696074,0.00028339782,0.00005793869,0.00049789815,0.009614258,0.00038999342,0.00044080438,0.0019143049,0.000016867649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019940192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022536153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019940192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031311333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020646933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039648294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024429949","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00437.x","title":"THE VALUE OF CONSUMER CHOICE AND THE DECLINE IN HMO ENROLLMENTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SR Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Moral hazard; Actuarial science; Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Business; Set (abstract data type); Health plan; Consumer choice; Health maintenance; Choice set; Economics; Microeconomics; Health care; Marketing; Finance; Incentive; Econometrics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06522246872135413,"score_gpt":0.30839192076995936,"score_spread":0.24316945204860524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024429949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94563,0.0018451896,0.0059619257,0.018849764,0.000045962366,0.00004275127,0.0009768228,0.000037701033,0.02660991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997672,0.00034297703,0.00026295532,0.0002929763,0.000027668595,0.0000079893425,0.00011553808,0.0000033255947,0.0012745726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830246,0.0009564614,0.0000468402,0.0001404731,0.0003137233,0.00024000522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97253484,0.021422036,0.004074022,0.0006557857,0.00078444445,0.0005288103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004548721,0.00016577537,0.0003558592,0.00078353845,0.00056416314,0.0023769508,0.0005641566,0.0017057273,0.006916269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027990606,0.00022060784,0.00043212142,0.0017580513,0.002042068,0.0019302104,0.0007488646,0.0019459724,0.00021384677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000894673,0.0002647419,0.49416342,0.00015051174,0.00023307242,0.0006799731,0.0010372252,0.10670419,0.0005866368,0.32097766,0.010000147,0.064307824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016954743,0.00026211957,0.5352773,0.0002024352,0.00014408721,0.00038606412,0.002838508,0.15638879,0.0007538676,0.2851023,0.01837253,0.00010252491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014731125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010082569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014731125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004537415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087472517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032921433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039944434","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12109","title":"GONE FISHING! REPORTED SICKNESS ABSENTEEISM AND THE WEATHER","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Absenteeism; Agency (philosophy); Order (exchange); Recreation; Exploit; Business; Quality (philosophy); Economics; Finance; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.03226476062113692,"score_gpt":0.21930803656084544,"score_spread":0.18704327593970851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039944434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897816,0.00048554872,0.00034230194,0.002427179,0.000020589576,0.0000077143995,0.0030816828,0.0000076389,0.0038457022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826884,0.0001548845,0.000048182323,0.00004967346,0.00001304035,0.0000015757087,0.0006641021,0.0000013636713,0.0007982997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946684,0.00011714081,0.000048359772,0.000054500735,0.00017584079,0.00013727421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99254864,0.0013869355,0.0043392754,0.00026521852,0.00077407056,0.00068585546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008289476,0.00007771658,0.00017779073,0.0007238956,0.00036293105,0.0010404389,0.00030152168,0.00037511284,0.006333208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007991097,0.00009385127,0.00019082098,0.001446219,0.00047431118,0.00043251851,0.00046987884,0.00049901893,0.00045030678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028559529,0.000010105702,0.9936726,0.00001627282,0.00002053091,0.00002771365,0.00020939649,0.00020615444,0.00005350404,0.00035035991,0.0014140534,0.0039907503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.657274e-7,0.000007321724,0.9987319,0.000008238295,0.0000041423245,0.000019480889,0.0004242469,0.00019083892,0.000012760183,0.00008644835,0.0005117845,0.000002236401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28870922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35692054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28870922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014069042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006065036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57405746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051359108","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00480.x","title":"THE EFFECTS OF PUBLICATION LAGS ON LIFE‐CYCLE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY IN ECONOMICS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Economics; Construct (python library); Demographic economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.07338443894661059,"score_gpt":0.28989842422215006,"score_spread":0.21651398527553947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051359108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98432654,0.0029946442,0.0013776335,0.0015579646,0.000084168045,0.00003201014,0.0075509404,0.00006273309,0.0020133487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948926,0.00051425205,0.00026867475,0.00008910625,0.00010846625,0.000019156605,0.0030796237,0.000013173013,0.0010149063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99287486,0.0014431026,0.0012710837,0.0013233771,0.0018515106,0.0012360526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61181545,0.16539992,0.17275643,0.015930885,0.017683392,0.016413959],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020325962,0.00034275503,0.00045289678,0.0068482487,0.0008510384,0.0035465523,0.0012656461,0.0009010066,0.0050371364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13667735,0.00033297262,0.0007077246,0.0094699245,0.001000586,0.0020551493,0.0017473191,0.0011881408,0.0013486588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015377763,0.000038423736,0.9921136,0.00003614836,0.00007062275,0.00006202871,0.00017939172,0.0007848173,0.00021543045,0.00024392828,0.00058884936,0.005512916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009602392,0.00008745801,0.9971726,0.000018223702,0.000025166439,0.00008249413,0.00018002435,0.000812156,0.0002132147,0.00036565255,0.0010231516,0.000010278046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011662224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014500669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020100446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022001362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10749525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052442056","doi":"10.1093/ei/39.4.627","title":"The Effect of Cocaine Prices on Crime","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Simultaneity; Economics; Deterrence (psychology); Consumption (sociology); Index (typography); Enforcement; Monetary economics; Econometrics; Political science","score_opus":0.045186711051679936,"score_gpt":0.3822261382693548,"score_spread":0.3370394272176749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052442056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980269,0.00006122795,0.00009662032,0.00017708295,0.000005361781,0.0000040781024,0.00044936503,0.0000035587348,0.0011758053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988023,0.00010464661,0.00006725775,0.000018133956,0.000009335336,0.0000036865372,0.000447568,0.0000032455732,0.0005439116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912745,0.00033616656,0.00006510119,0.00013180381,0.00017107917,0.00016835795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99218833,0.0033469829,0.002663308,0.00046454786,0.00071528077,0.0006217057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000534474,0.00022830567,0.0002523883,0.00087851234,0.00045160693,0.0011193036,0.0003110903,0.00042757724,0.0037752718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008327111,0.00029678075,0.0005040464,0.0010780966,0.0006471293,0.0006259388,0.0008385573,0.00088364515,0.00039280736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014980538,0.0000868181,0.99221486,0.000009687998,0.00012357913,0.00008681893,0.00007239867,0.0011446556,0.00024437395,0.00036670745,0.00037953907,0.00512074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002269854,0.000028745502,0.9987478,0.0000024617702,0.000016482487,0.00002485098,0.000052824347,0.00073378,0.0001226681,0.000064964646,0.00020058783,0.0000023944453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038886383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06787162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038886383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001264027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074973895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07732004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052795645","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00070.x","title":"THE AUCTION MARKET FOR MODERN PRINTS: CONFIRMATIONS, CONTRADICTIONS, AND NEW PUZZLES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Art History and Market Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Economics; Common value auction; Financial economics; Set (abstract data type); Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05024324044731584,"score_gpt":0.25227235915622653,"score_spread":0.2020291187089107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052795645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875036,0.0014226112,0.0010672811,0.0018981495,0.000031490225,0.000009752389,0.0006204293,0.000027797527,0.007418795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981857,0.00019591948,0.00013484342,0.00007716787,0.000076914606,0.0000031468498,0.00044418155,0.000010670406,0.00087151263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988888,0.0002952902,0.00011497334,0.00019781032,0.00039531005,0.0001077146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.948411,0.02721091,0.018748393,0.002781379,0.0018421465,0.001006125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003837125,0.00017338849,0.0006061523,0.0026570193,0.0006444483,0.0036903012,0.00077266706,0.0006806114,0.005991741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028592786,0.00021839756,0.0003672953,0.0030220181,0.0023084956,0.0039978833,0.0012478229,0.001433002,0.00096763985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007183603,0.00018913507,0.88517606,0.0002376141,0.00033574025,0.0011029621,0.0034514933,0.004913364,0.0007851844,0.035431806,0.010895115,0.056763336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092605675,0.00011094118,0.9385139,0.00009344697,0.000132255,0.00074850384,0.0051437714,0.016501924,0.00078811496,0.023869686,0.013919848,0.000084993284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049814475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068779937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005991741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089934573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031353006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020292878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053983733","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00426.x","title":"ESTIMATING DYNAMIC EULER EQUATIONS WITH MULTIVARIATE PROFESSIONAL FORECASTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Econometrics; Multivariate statistics; Survey of Professional Forecasters; Inflation (cosmology); Interest rate; Consumption (sociology); Real interest rate; Nominal interest rate; Asset (computer security); Panel data; Euler equations; Fisher hypothesis; Monetary policy; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Finance; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.11705533335374943,"score_gpt":0.29759195386364795,"score_spread":0.18053662050989852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053983733","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14488772,0.0003059072,0.8458869,0.0010101135,0.000060985996,0.000072848816,0.0015625515,0.0005637323,0.005649149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78808415,0.00081473164,0.20257121,0.00014802528,0.00020835847,0.0001967387,0.0031981282,0.00008834888,0.0046903198],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873966,0.00063325954,0.00008051905,0.0002474062,0.00020685306,0.00009235245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854702,0.010916677,0.001983767,0.0008611639,0.00054878625,0.0002194694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030878435,0.0006533618,0.00078425894,0.0012018558,0.00028890898,0.0015697298,0.0006715277,0.0008611283,0.0044544316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03235953,0.0010253857,0.0006310633,0.0014713879,0.0005869553,0.0024942565,0.0011247408,0.001581991,0.0007284206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009325268,0.000088717534,0.033848,0.00007413766,0.00013142034,0.00009704256,0.00019077068,0.7908474,0.0002953615,0.10261737,0.003917355,0.067799196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002315367,0.000013809665,0.0026053686,0.000018983601,0.0000134734355,0.000014666397,0.000040142546,0.9324456,0.00016093583,0.06300498,0.0016409043,0.00001806003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022894219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016609814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022894219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079503073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016253354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045521915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056660701","doi":"10.1093/ei/40.1.60","title":"Distortionary Taxation and Optimal Public Spending on Productive Activities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public good; Microeconomics; Revenue; Consumption (sociology); Production (economics); Public spending; General equilibrium theory; Public capital; Public economics; Capital (architecture); Interpretation (philosophy); Public investment; Finance","score_opus":0.09588742443414397,"score_gpt":0.23832798471065753,"score_spread":0.14244056027651356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056660701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65466475,0.0043294923,0.17704894,0.007790585,0.0002988076,0.0001563483,0.0015387173,0.00042469814,0.15374756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852276,0.00147015,0.004399586,0.00010192053,0.000045814093,0.000042612468,0.00015601315,0.000067780034,0.008488596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989266,0.00036986,0.000055359054,0.00012040598,0.00013038512,0.00039736574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963491,0.0018038201,0.00086026767,0.00041166923,0.00038356593,0.00019161384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023370085,0.0008543631,0.0014675334,0.0011108202,0.0007488603,0.003549963,0.0009168018,0.0012263393,0.0064426092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009506821,0.0007126416,0.0007438567,0.0014169896,0.0030751957,0.0037631178,0.0017842922,0.0013843898,0.00090234686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003775151,0.000080636375,0.0024387774,0.00012405448,0.00007176915,0.00015142321,0.00018117629,0.28278708,0.00079874037,0.6955191,0.0018899486,0.015579718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013459455,0.000065498694,0.0038035114,0.00010502338,0.0000644193,0.00009105855,0.00033661205,0.15970674,0.000980851,0.8292472,0.005424231,0.00004021174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012102586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010117122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012102586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008795847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033035825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063818574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070486653","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12107","title":"WHICH JOURNAL RANKINGS BEST EXPLAIN ACADEMIC SALARIES? EVIDENCE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Ranking (information retrieval); Promotion (chess); Economics; Test (biology); Journal ranking; Political science; Citation; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02452970204178066,"score_gpt":0.21981362914593147,"score_spread":0.19528392710415082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070486653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9643765,0.005178801,0.000441394,0.006308174,0.00011365992,0.000043036063,0.0016407012,0.000057674853,0.021840056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956126,0.0009506014,0.00013062787,0.00019018391,0.00012059763,0.000008333735,0.0006854066,0.000012371934,0.0022891695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970682,0.0009972511,0.00023655772,0.0004105985,0.0008895445,0.00039781485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85865647,0.06365263,0.047083925,0.004298987,0.014633047,0.011674981],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077812253,0.0002371699,0.00046149784,0.0034611335,0.00122394,0.0035086998,0.0009926902,0.00061779475,0.009771059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05899342,0.00025141393,0.00040002054,0.0057009645,0.00097360543,0.0015764199,0.0012547529,0.00082685583,0.0014325277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006630692,0.00021533185,0.9574313,0.00020077797,0.00020328538,0.0000842692,0.00093815645,0.001073353,0.00007918406,0.0031820508,0.012997429,0.02293179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072280236,0.00010896103,0.9898316,0.000102992955,0.00010208966,0.000028790164,0.0012749864,0.0012527471,0.00008992565,0.0018780432,0.005237457,0.000020214322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0627308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05818263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025219987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023394846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1247313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072247664","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2006.00034.x","title":"NOMINAL WAGE CONTRACTS AND THE MONETARY TRANSMISSION MECHANISM","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Monetary transmission mechanism; Wage; Matching (statistics); Consumption (sociology); Welfare; Mechanism (biology); Monetary economics; Monetary policy; General equilibrium theory; Transmission (telecommunications); Microeconomics; Labour economics; Inflation targeting; Credit channel; Computer science","score_opus":0.055405656174869596,"score_gpt":0.23559677348137548,"score_spread":0.1801911173065059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072247664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6324201,0.0012150236,0.3156984,0.0049185,0.00025982413,0.00009572189,0.00053601817,0.00029839523,0.044558056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896339,0.00033018162,0.006243164,0.00008318719,0.000046780166,0.000023613551,0.000051200015,0.000011432028,0.003576535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999164,0.00038369297,0.00005195709,0.00013516171,0.00016661649,0.000098651595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965377,0.0013152456,0.0014914464,0.0002928668,0.00020493538,0.00015779976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002576798,0.00033728563,0.00041141352,0.00049869367,0.0005186425,0.0021686256,0.0011959415,0.0015474256,0.0064333095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010377384,0.000409147,0.00042482305,0.0010006774,0.0011952901,0.0032890427,0.0009308596,0.001241782,0.0005882159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016227555,0.00004530761,0.0026914638,0.00004905831,0.000054246753,0.00025021122,0.00025716916,0.23097013,0.0010341579,0.7431112,0.0015696974,0.019805083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001319981,0.00008036489,0.002387304,0.000032748492,0.00003236005,0.00012952245,0.00016245489,0.5026537,0.00037323585,0.4898998,0.004078914,0.000037614504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002615007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001160272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064333095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012535875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010262306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021521568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074097612","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00214.x","title":"THE EARLY BIRD GETS THE WORM? BIRTH ORDER EFFECTS IN A DYNAMIC FAMILY MODEL","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Order (exchange); Scope (computer science); Birth order; Overlapping generations model; Work (physics); Labour economics; Population; Medicine","score_opus":0.01730069346963627,"score_gpt":0.2747363820537045,"score_spread":0.25743568858406823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074097612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6529041,0.0040362184,0.19405262,0.025460241,0.00032172,0.000121232464,0.0032773921,0.00030326218,0.119523145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615037,0.0018041874,0.004745121,0.0003285008,0.00011440623,0.00006747947,0.00033511204,0.000041572024,0.031060014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996939,0.00013937707,0.000007930201,0.000048641698,0.000024616793,0.00008548795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842083,0.00096046116,0.00021400405,0.0000830248,0.00007985864,0.0002417682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013078058,0.000411874,0.0006962194,0.00069665216,0.0010498846,0.0017931586,0.0015233452,0.001395404,0.017680809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004329557,0.00034136596,0.0006933332,0.000932437,0.0012401515,0.002319592,0.0009469174,0.0014034276,0.0009940119],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013176241,0.00012571347,0.016406596,0.000059529866,0.00008697618,0.0007649777,0.00090279855,0.18655363,0.0001984736,0.76774454,0.011528451,0.015496537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009865313,0.000077088465,0.0065849316,0.000070839924,0.00010022677,0.00039273687,0.00086275476,0.4917766,0.000053999232,0.48856744,0.011368305,0.00004638867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029081788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023589117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029081788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023479236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083758746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059148133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076292976","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12150","title":"FIRM PRODUCTIVITY AND SALES DESTINATIONS: EVIDENCE FROM WITHIN CHINA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Destinations; Productivity; China; Linkage (software); Economics; Business; International market; International trade; Tourism; Macroeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.10263799583044828,"score_gpt":0.24778768792616235,"score_spread":0.14514969209571407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076292976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99631053,0.0005003286,0.00013553929,0.0001367555,0.000007835212,0.000005626988,0.00086586125,0.00001159836,0.0020260122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853253,0.00019439841,0.000023375565,0.000013676273,0.000009135697,0.0000020532366,0.0006502676,0.0000025195172,0.0005720644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993401,0.000083253864,0.000051024057,0.00016126875,0.00014080673,0.00022348264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920952,0.0013376803,0.0033366699,0.00058368413,0.0013454251,0.0013013541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096784777,0.00040848332,0.00048763884,0.0030522123,0.0008496443,0.0012845051,0.0006305355,0.0002589745,0.004085795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004311856,0.00023512372,0.00061008334,0.0058079786,0.0008725837,0.00081737497,0.001449335,0.00043730316,0.00046129923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006329763,0.000021616162,0.9929327,0.000027518228,0.00011583674,0.00019626699,0.00057038077,0.00033747518,0.000111365116,0.0003590274,0.00050547376,0.0047590947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001036393,0.000024130528,0.9976459,0.000012300174,0.000050654846,0.000044407432,0.00083995215,0.0005120854,0.00011000687,0.000080945436,0.00066095014,0.000008213688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15707594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15212837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15707594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012041384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012808163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31232333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078510749","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00397.x","title":"CONSUMPTION BENEFITS OF NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE GAME TRIPS ESTIMATED FROM REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCE DEMAND DATA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Ticket; Economic surplus; Consumption (sociology); Revealed preference; Economics; Metropolitan area; Attendance; Microeconomics; Advertising; Business; Welfare; Geography; Economic growth; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.4297592420107627,"score_gpt":0.29885835073426914,"score_spread":0.13090089127649357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078510749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951427,0.00008635136,0.00093012024,0.000103920305,0.0000020566295,0.0000126073965,0.0029663264,0.000018643064,0.0007374263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932088,0.00007351283,0.00035440418,0.000012766284,0.0000025612412,0.000007949681,0.005453242,0.0000032760117,0.0008833869],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957305,0.00010722062,0.000024323741,0.00007110348,0.000121995196,0.000102321064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99694747,0.0015094526,0.00070275133,0.0002542824,0.00038954787,0.00019644493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008580487,0.00031228428,0.00033284345,0.0010135942,0.00027772575,0.0011039922,0.00071306684,0.0004825201,0.0032361757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005174467,0.00033730347,0.00061186403,0.001991481,0.00054556987,0.00054600084,0.0005179432,0.00063856394,0.00048708066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042163156,0.00013191551,0.9302934,0.00005473357,0.0001861906,0.0001454368,0.00032012747,0.055891424,0.0005060037,0.0018859254,0.0013696455,0.008793509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033486347,0.00008401055,0.8802864,0.000017561018,0.00009150368,0.00006567937,0.00093326555,0.11541189,0.00034371312,0.0010496064,0.0016432734,0.00003974881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5355489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.602046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5355489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048584016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001520397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93437266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082039159","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00374.x","title":"GENDER AND THE INFLUENCE OF PEER ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION ON ADOLESCENT SEXUAL ACTIVITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cargill (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual intercourse; Alcohol consumption; Alcohol; Consumption (sociology); Peer group; Psychology; Sexual behavior; Developmental psychology; Demography; Social psychology; Population; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.24548407364109537,"score_gpt":0.3874719426846241,"score_spread":0.14198786904352872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082039159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99633235,0.00040736678,0.00011062235,0.00017917172,0.000013321803,0.000004598166,0.000086175794,0.000002751562,0.0028637068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916565,0.0001382613,0.000033119857,0.0000127233925,0.0000074052778,0.0000022077177,0.000031501,0.0000015346411,0.0006075542],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938726,0.00031800856,0.000021352946,0.000066467204,0.00008431283,0.00012255028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957979,0.002194539,0.0010192076,0.00021045,0.00014307712,0.00063485734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000654716,0.00020796795,0.0002562973,0.00039063086,0.0002662059,0.00058898196,0.00028701083,0.0002861619,0.006038068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057951566,0.00011139467,0.0006158401,0.00033894987,0.0003992934,0.00028487243,0.0006008515,0.0004918245,0.00023112049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023707985,0.000094389325,0.9917555,0.000017283433,0.00019215449,0.00016201398,0.0004115216,0.000141978,0.00029953013,0.00074215914,0.00015357297,0.005792874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045750776,0.00012609501,0.9975889,0.000017231469,0.00010834818,0.00007452025,0.0007197487,0.00048664908,0.00016911942,0.00029204026,0.00040928173,0.0000034272086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011678004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012604903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011678004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003565686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034783458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023220062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086702917","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00454.x","title":"GROWTH AND CONVERGENCE WHEN TECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN CAPITAL ARE COMPLEMENTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Human capital; Stock (firearms); Endogenous growth theory; Physical capital; Per capita; Capital deepening; Monetary economics; Production (economics); Productivity; Capital Consumption Allowance; Capital intensity; Financial capital; Macroeconomics; Capital formation; Market economy","score_opus":0.05261347853517415,"score_gpt":0.2471955107129498,"score_spread":0.19458203217777564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086702917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6581858,0.0024994363,0.08249466,0.010647286,0.00026540065,0.00008913935,0.0005802065,0.00031434916,0.24492374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760265,0.0011227792,0.0020233765,0.00022040278,0.00012593732,0.000057402693,0.0001099709,0.000029974819,0.020283729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927264,0.00025008,0.000027765574,0.00012999504,0.00008922124,0.00023034622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960794,0.0019364371,0.0008182557,0.000306025,0.00038301968,0.00047687415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015530976,0.0008140194,0.001218238,0.0015804658,0.0009949768,0.004177133,0.0006759127,0.002108299,0.012490375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008806504,0.00044766374,0.0010297358,0.0014917857,0.0027967575,0.0051719444,0.0033395549,0.0016564487,0.0015485965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002166866,0.00011732845,0.008123049,0.00011658217,0.00007808251,0.001483187,0.0008743279,0.1039453,0.00048194572,0.8630921,0.003943341,0.017528182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016324005,0.0000839707,0.0040615923,0.00010141529,0.000056257053,0.00066602224,0.0010867529,0.15474351,0.00023136195,0.8279993,0.010762918,0.00004360183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072427336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027121827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012490375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017883742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010759619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041784406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087247454","doi":"10.1093/ei/39.3.444","title":"A Quality‐of‐Play Model of a Professional Sports League","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Economics; Quality (philosophy); Microeconomics; Value (mathematics); Social planner; League; Balance (ability); Preference; Marketing; Business; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10830711629363747,"score_gpt":0.3039179602378758,"score_spread":0.19561084394423833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087247454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52725774,0.0017065489,0.22901075,0.010390044,0.0004102705,0.00080165704,0.0048436117,0.00035928786,0.22522008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9098715,0.0010778792,0.011911088,0.00030931446,0.00017652013,0.00044707084,0.0010108062,0.000047900463,0.075147904],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990747,0.00032896674,0.00003097073,0.00015696317,0.00010186366,0.00030660615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770266,0.0008398577,0.00044086573,0.000114124115,0.0002490675,0.0006534132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001605748,0.0014645249,0.0013404487,0.0011486405,0.0012426481,0.0043124086,0.004355326,0.0047714324,0.040805515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004816164,0.0008778931,0.0013864501,0.0013620049,0.0024849877,0.002975444,0.0020374923,0.0033115032,0.004432294],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009057754,0.00079001026,0.0060497224,0.00016387645,0.00011711107,0.00078749936,0.000578838,0.5107337,0.0011735028,0.46412823,0.0060445177,0.0085271485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049830764,0.00031168398,0.0023338054,0.00004710843,0.00006621924,0.00012759077,0.00042867364,0.8914173,0.000078236786,0.10001677,0.0046176487,0.00005665576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04470828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025157928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04470828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036554849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002127216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13650805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087837578","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00497.x","title":"A CENTURY OF HUMAN CAPITAL AND HOURS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Life expectancy; Economics; Productivity; Wage; Labour economics; Educational attainment; Demographic economics; Working hours; Work hours; Earnings; Demography; Population; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.045265611726326836,"score_gpt":0.24196071163900712,"score_spread":0.19669509991268028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087837578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5076863,0.05198283,0.023805343,0.06466323,0.0018399237,0.000044767483,0.0019269238,0.00014244986,0.34790823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97338957,0.007758276,0.0008420321,0.0015114321,0.00058006094,0.000015061397,0.00017625249,0.000014806554,0.015712459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997173,0.000067709945,0.000009953823,0.00006482845,0.000071555456,0.00006868374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992756,0.0001812715,0.00019193674,0.00010591123,0.00008681143,0.00015850062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034546177,0.00021586027,0.0002275713,0.00038799545,0.0005161813,0.0021938088,0.00028436363,0.0008014433,0.0066314815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002173589,0.000112510446,0.00018698604,0.0010423359,0.0022823154,0.0018796095,0.00092463614,0.001276062,0.0006097002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016028236,0.00010849075,0.057849847,0.00023180588,0.00009374338,0.00030121423,0.0022969234,0.015068764,0.0011280162,0.74780464,0.030343777,0.14461249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003738666,0.00016459156,0.14969435,0.0005523629,0.000042064832,0.0007265754,0.00255622,0.007069449,0.00059479853,0.43996635,0.3985267,0.00006922506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062512364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046257027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066314815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014745313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006577514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02218455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087964828","doi":"10.1093/ei/41.1.80","title":"Nontariff Barriers and Trade Liberalization","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Economics; Tariff; International economics; Free trade; Liberalization; International trade; Incentive; Commercial policy; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.07995389177945957,"score_gpt":0.2066872043562072,"score_spread":0.12673331257674764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087964828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52243036,0.004316854,0.15042506,0.00672272,0.00015706746,0.00011474875,0.00040382505,0.00030139572,0.31512803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886221,0.00090919004,0.002402278,0.0002276993,0.000027344184,0.000026375057,0.00004458746,0.00002625615,0.0077142315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988254,0.00041351814,0.000052455493,0.00020030195,0.00020580702,0.00030256028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967223,0.0014348672,0.0010681786,0.00036134358,0.00020571024,0.00020763765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009796517,0.0005479303,0.0005536911,0.000789058,0.0009144499,0.0027741457,0.00076318503,0.0010305209,0.013261396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004724778,0.00030706023,0.00076371175,0.00091027503,0.0028234276,0.0033898929,0.0023396292,0.0018820786,0.0006579045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007371784,0.00006382997,0.0022041427,0.00017739595,0.00003168237,0.00022907951,0.0002876698,0.043434814,0.0015102676,0.9397901,0.0009298613,0.0112673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007505372,0.000092705755,0.0043858057,0.00009514653,0.000028444665,0.0003434373,0.0004016503,0.033788465,0.0018299792,0.9355494,0.02338348,0.000026625747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033707717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029087688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013261396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015299437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012151216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044363856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096975625","doi":"10.1093/ei/cbi064","title":"THE USEFULNESS OF CONSUMER CONFIDENCE IN FORECASTING HOUSEHOLD SPENDING IN CANADA: A NATIONAL AND REGIONAL ANALYSIS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer confidence index; Personal consumption expenditures price index; Consumer spending; Consumption (sociology); Index (typography); Economics; Demographic economics; Business; Actuarial science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.07980337101441126,"score_gpt":0.246489992465584,"score_spread":0.16668662145117275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096975625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914643,0.0004812307,0.0004214922,0.00060175866,0.000009024229,0.00001440443,0.0033325613,0.00003100226,0.0036443435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683195,0.00022795217,0.0002951175,0.000021328493,0.000004140458,0.00000464254,0.0019134006,0.00000572337,0.0006957289],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994204,0.00008366268,0.00002967054,0.00008591631,0.00021909035,0.00016131416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935464,0.0014912371,0.00077855523,0.00026122094,0.003382225,0.0005404751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016628973,0.00039098796,0.00043853588,0.0017104823,0.001246873,0.0015387204,0.0010009492,0.00035889176,0.0020363166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009668677,0.00018607259,0.0007742193,0.0038043768,0.0007250127,0.0004593381,0.00079687947,0.0008034487,0.00023150006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009890237,0.000025170879,0.97943205,0.000022048514,0.0001324125,0.000071530994,0.00047068537,0.007200449,0.00008286504,0.0005854021,0.0019107185,0.009967846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000794124,0.000018913335,0.97197735,0.00003282089,0.00010272393,0.00002801369,0.0013882605,0.024563886,0.00014813252,0.00019711646,0.0015120037,0.000022864042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99488515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01678338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01678338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015136599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12177253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099443649","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12294","title":"THE DUAL‐PROCESS DRIFT DIFFUSION MODEL: EVIDENCE FROM RESPONSE TIMES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Diffusion; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Econometrics; Decision process; Computer science; Key (lock); Economics; Simple (philosophy); Diffusion process; Operations research; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Innovation diffusion; Management science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.31888650802808277,"score_gpt":0.4526974124004771,"score_spread":0.13381090437239435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099443649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8061364,0.00087542785,0.1764449,0.0028237444,0.00011332384,0.00020374672,0.00084348675,0.0004272484,0.012131722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796673,0.00030790878,0.016947426,0.00026691184,0.000056188168,0.00013045214,0.00037890932,0.00007381232,0.0021711446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977424,0.001243307,0.00010114093,0.00040993598,0.00031573995,0.00018752394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.916921,0.06647602,0.0056374576,0.0070008645,0.0022472674,0.001717384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122774895,0.0006844296,0.0014856707,0.0010998846,0.00056966674,0.0021865969,0.002248137,0.0022433067,0.012981856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08445915,0.0005837751,0.0011227112,0.0013034529,0.0018000228,0.003918118,0.0013750965,0.003009801,0.0024178226],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009556108,0.0022519266,0.0958783,0.0008094698,0.00062487985,0.0008068805,0.003203184,0.23602024,0.013672709,0.5114051,0.010364629,0.115406625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006504242,0.00030718074,0.019792736,0.000032233755,0.0001076746,0.00032380983,0.00018865969,0.6657915,0.00094675604,0.30963573,0.0020934746,0.00012986004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004655711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015923285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012981856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012191753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064480986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06493032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101318105","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00220.x","title":"DOES RAIDING EXPLAIN THE NEGATIVE RETURNS TO FACULTY SENIORITY?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seniority; Monopsony; Economics; Productivity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Quality (philosophy); Labour economics; Political science; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.041717769071243006,"score_gpt":0.2775459435351934,"score_spread":0.2358281744639504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101318105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994532,0.00032358017,0.0006352132,0.0019882526,0.000028900546,0.00000951611,0.00018081973,0.000016182943,0.0022854954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891984,0.000057496327,0.00011391245,0.00010913383,0.00003702957,0.0000022072713,0.00008705431,0.0000041880653,0.0006690874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989718,0.00020947443,0.00008061192,0.00018518537,0.00014319162,0.00040973694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97163165,0.0076058246,0.0145735275,0.0020132193,0.00078903674,0.00338676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024670558,0.00026082003,0.0005642992,0.001213121,0.0009150626,0.0018487384,0.0011448233,0.0011859072,0.011792559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019308537,0.00021826434,0.0006398814,0.0014283988,0.0010842744,0.0012872313,0.0013679562,0.0011849536,0.001481465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120497054,0.00006860996,0.98705125,0.000011001446,0.00003379019,0.00012059833,0.00022951003,0.00029204998,0.00015025488,0.0008979787,0.00059431244,0.01043013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019875733,0.00009154677,0.9906538,0.000017155093,0.000040726427,0.00013684963,0.0011147527,0.003376164,0.00018744914,0.0033846668,0.0009661209,0.000010985396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011918492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011471988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011918492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063856127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007697282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03945005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102077277","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12066","title":"SUPERSTITION IN THE HOUSING MARKET","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Superstition; Real estate; Economics; Immigration; Population; Residential real estate; House price; Financial economics; Demographic economics; Monetary economics; Finance; Geography; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.039774898637103824,"score_gpt":0.22483213606861277,"score_spread":0.18505723743150895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102077277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997232,0.000054413944,0.00017082595,0.000136122,0.0000018504523,0.0000030289254,0.000021458878,0.000003145718,0.0023771431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970055,0.000024413954,0.000036726695,0.00001514228,0.000005266199,8.985345e-7,0.000016464888,6.467126e-7,0.00019998879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971336,0.00007823674,0.000017451383,0.00004702604,0.000086627355,0.00005728586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954548,0.0015006288,0.0019772365,0.0004313551,0.00022787943,0.0004081021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007097008,0.00013069065,0.00024812904,0.0004270599,0.00053515815,0.001231292,0.0003125014,0.00036701703,0.0054682866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036049916,0.00015793862,0.00022354678,0.0004056227,0.0019840535,0.0010240532,0.0007755813,0.00070781197,0.0002650076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048674963,0.0003486827,0.926106,0.00006678548,0.00020002568,0.0010704226,0.003453345,0.0022902319,0.0054519796,0.03493844,0.00085687917,0.024730494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024234037,0.00010460257,0.9818617,0.0000072247944,0.000033303568,0.000119146214,0.0009408703,0.0055855117,0.0004726301,0.009911284,0.0009245184,0.000014935926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015710536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013644278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015710536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084456836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034738207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031238198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105089260","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00167.x","title":"COSTLY EXTERNAL FINANCE AND INVESTMENT EFFICIENCY IN A MARKET EQUILIBRIUM MODEL","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Economics; Productivity; Monetary economics; Capital market imperfections; Finance; Capital (architecture); Internal financing; Corporate finance; Capital market; Macroeconomics; Information asymmetry","score_opus":0.03517749561271067,"score_gpt":0.238194254442229,"score_spread":0.20301675882951833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105089260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41310847,0.0033138492,0.34273094,0.010133138,0.00017291322,0.0002275058,0.0015723042,0.00062676554,0.22811414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593521,0.0010127776,0.0061102165,0.00023871403,0.000075163494,0.000117492484,0.00022017094,0.000050058134,0.03282335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934345,0.00027025738,0.000030314752,0.0000961103,0.00008141728,0.0001784896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695194,0.0016895956,0.0006848014,0.00016602027,0.00020714787,0.0003004788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016932704,0.0009806103,0.00142961,0.0009683033,0.0005957627,0.004600554,0.0016358279,0.0029432368,0.017116904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006617841,0.00071568077,0.0008724366,0.001047614,0.0019865911,0.0034553832,0.0013845612,0.0015035113,0.0018748092],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010319783,0.00011261822,0.0011682755,0.0000927325,0.00005256197,0.0003094319,0.00010092403,0.39127257,0.00038445278,0.5979832,0.003031866,0.0053882035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015459274,0.00006922603,0.00080169685,0.00004727563,0.000034873694,0.00009555588,0.00006725389,0.6583784,0.00011980112,0.33708394,0.0031193723,0.00002809244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041131843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024571456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017116904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028239444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011573083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057261765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106957215","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12072","title":"AGGREGATION AND THE STAGGERING OF PRICE CHANGES","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Microfoundations; Economics; Price setting; Econometrics; Distribution (mathematics); Price level; Business cycle; Set (abstract data type); Microeconomics; Keynesian economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06633357341378773,"score_gpt":0.22918531087895905,"score_spread":0.16285173746517131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106957215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763822,0.0012094636,0.016411062,0.0005023315,0.000028988303,0.00002144074,0.0013757576,0.00020379359,0.003864969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788505,0.00017032807,0.0010657691,0.000025123392,0.000020847838,0.0000045709744,0.0005155315,0.000018172452,0.00029461193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978278,0.00052582304,0.00022258419,0.0007928715,0.00044374674,0.00018706218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96899825,0.012097314,0.013094736,0.0038538494,0.001584297,0.00037160655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003065682,0.0001650697,0.0006180563,0.0020482137,0.0004749625,0.0027299423,0.0005221604,0.00068049954,0.0026719042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031971723,0.00040150608,0.00040862002,0.004364466,0.0013547202,0.0018099776,0.0007974348,0.00080529595,0.0005786857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048467517,0.0000694522,0.8401275,0.00020315549,0.0006192959,0.0006081853,0.0017374035,0.029073142,0.003956332,0.027176235,0.00468631,0.09125822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027374137,0.00006742742,0.90990365,0.0000425066,0.00012131208,0.00036220753,0.00057153025,0.046490256,0.0011465837,0.035574637,0.005650681,0.0000419121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011719925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076154275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011719925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010401916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034727162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02330339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108509794","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00422.x","title":"NON‐MONETARY INCENTIVES AND OPPORTUNISTIC BEHAVIOR: EVIDENCE FROM A LABORATORY PUBLIC GOOD GAME","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Public good; Economics; Free riding; Nash equilibrium; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Public goods game; Public economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.12250454600187691,"score_gpt":0.35822583553702353,"score_spread":0.23572128953514662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108509794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99285626,0.00009779686,0.002294208,0.00028431608,0.000013546313,0.00008333668,0.00009752472,0.000026457621,0.0042465692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968598,0.00009847273,0.0016703111,0.00015210372,0.000013924483,0.00016277655,0.000095430485,0.0000094276,0.0009377056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579394,0.00322227,0.00016670556,0.00024374892,0.00039803534,0.00017536862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8993492,0.07613879,0.015087081,0.0065628076,0.0010872383,0.0017747799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056301104,0.0005361282,0.0007188394,0.00060514815,0.0005966745,0.0013118777,0.00091003266,0.0010681521,0.0039181462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033071667,0.0003441095,0.00034364138,0.00036322718,0.0021165602,0.0010139332,0.00088910357,0.0011855339,0.00043936603],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036411617,0.120373346,0.3393857,0.0025083816,0.0026087794,0.0023819979,0.006449255,0.0649881,0.09792824,0.10383981,0.023676075,0.1994488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014853268,0.054173995,0.4645236,0.0004098497,0.00089723076,0.0020117725,0.0052902023,0.26268122,0.047434907,0.122952074,0.024090026,0.000681868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017724759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017463289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056301104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078618305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005655624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029775202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108518570","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00245.x","title":"REAL COSTS OF NOMINAL GRADE INFLATION? NEW EVIDENCE FROM STUDENT COURSE EVALUATIONS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Innovations in Educational Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inflation (cosmology); Investment (military); Quarter (Canadian coin); Simultaneity; Economics; Grade inflation; Course (navigation); Class (philosophy); Econometrics; Point (geometry); Demographic economics; Higher education; Mathematics; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.14460224536940033,"score_gpt":0.5192600345704007,"score_spread":0.37465778920100035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108518570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804598,0.0018825812,0.00050750136,0.004076933,0.000049652786,0.000014565257,0.001965554,0.000019715886,0.011023705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983437,0.0003168091,0.00006453368,0.0001660812,0.000044502274,0.000005926612,0.00064238056,0.0000058988976,0.00041011127],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948573,0.0027567667,0.00038525442,0.00044788196,0.0012120199,0.00034073743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8512258,0.07974151,0.052465744,0.0061156526,0.007993163,0.0024581342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053818915,0.00018769843,0.00038309436,0.001285461,0.00040396242,0.0031248766,0.0007296813,0.0009224636,0.004908982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06679457,0.00027848833,0.00035398253,0.0025980833,0.00087113987,0.0015650681,0.0013080119,0.0016421018,0.0006513989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046109525,0.000114200055,0.97519386,0.000058479574,0.00013662732,0.00007122065,0.00030503227,0.00086960185,0.00003764586,0.0020465984,0.0020125601,0.01869308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000203345,0.00007537134,0.9960013,0.000029914418,0.000055050798,0.000026818563,0.0004989547,0.0008747691,0.000076069926,0.0009548894,0.0013752092,0.000011363841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011762701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009956177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011762701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011457802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041748665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02846253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109322359","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00306.x","title":"WELL‐INFORMED INTERMEDIARIES IN STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Communication source; Intermediary; Incentive; Cheap talk; Strategic communication; Decision maker; Microeconomics; Distortion (music); Economics; Action (physics); Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Marketing; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.06813251749240747,"score_gpt":0.3758682359320779,"score_spread":0.30773571843967046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109322359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3832344,0.008525879,0.21478805,0.038593285,0.00045867058,0.00053305406,0.00040677795,0.0002695709,0.3531903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816077,0.0021593892,0.0075018993,0.0004952876,0.0001632267,0.0001250481,0.00003525217,0.000016712418,0.007895445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951356,0.0034039065,0.00020895817,0.00038453416,0.00047161808,0.000395417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96396375,0.026026856,0.0061626043,0.0018811174,0.0010658276,0.0008999119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00870635,0.0008278389,0.0007599656,0.0013832868,0.0020950832,0.007121021,0.0008922372,0.0050599864,0.015289057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02604954,0.0008496653,0.00048588266,0.0017440636,0.0065764873,0.0088510355,0.0033801044,0.0030947265,0.0017298588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011823056,0.000037180263,0.001343021,0.00011881141,0.000027932056,0.00021420611,0.0007526585,0.007012227,0.00047174832,0.98188925,0.0009937685,0.0070209834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082001534,0.00005219159,0.0006623711,0.000073772426,0.000035007743,0.00011805597,0.0004453285,0.0131603535,0.00033330655,0.9797253,0.0052886093,0.000023724502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014320211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011052623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015289057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025823016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002154895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051147044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111046244","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12287","title":"THE EVOLUTIONARY LOGIC OF HONORING SUNK COSTS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sunk costs; Cognitive dissonance; Economics; Phenomenon; Function (biology); Positive economics; Microeconomics; Neoclassical economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.3533139611296619,"score_gpt":0.4440464302118628,"score_spread":0.0907324690822009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111046244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38625467,0.0017897799,0.168448,0.027116481,0.0005240524,0.0001149125,0.0001971079,0.00012083418,0.41543412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880074,0.00027767362,0.005790279,0.0005348048,0.0000849287,0.00003181023,0.000015352774,0.0000145716895,0.0052431854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982476,0.00081187364,0.00006396831,0.00031059288,0.0003589565,0.00020705641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962135,0.0017486623,0.00075875234,0.00049196254,0.00037377368,0.00041332116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002703929,0.00038417176,0.00036071916,0.0007688434,0.001283275,0.0041234028,0.0009021084,0.002539609,0.008462058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010422129,0.00020497874,0.00037795122,0.0006429563,0.007933914,0.004130954,0.0019483838,0.0028396824,0.00041504944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004058265,0.000019047624,0.0011693708,0.00004116379,0.000022287648,0.0001197412,0.00023712263,0.003877226,0.00051335996,0.98335016,0.0008395599,0.009770468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019769506,0.000025608173,0.0021911627,0.00003252218,0.000014547872,0.00019756964,0.0002550611,0.0067947484,0.00025236886,0.98446596,0.0057282564,0.00002253416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008933163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090004393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008462058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024520468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090614124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028308451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111660538","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00391.x","title":"THE IMPACT OF ENTITLEMENTS AND EQUITY ON COOPERATIVE BARGAINING: AN EXPERIMENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Entitlement (fair division); Negotiation; Bargaining problem; Economics; Equity (law); Outcome (game theory); Arbitration; Pareto principle; Microeconomics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.22314726856148068,"score_gpt":0.4572766982725453,"score_spread":0.23412942971106462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111660538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98379403,0.00005727604,0.0024123015,0.0005773162,0.000120522214,0.0007937546,0.00015162716,0.00003252994,0.012060599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811917,0.00011356963,0.0075654807,0.00093972986,0.00014826942,0.002605983,0.00014298488,0.000027327087,0.0072649806],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960989,0.001839387,0.00024112497,0.0006923401,0.00073979876,0.00038847094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670106,0.025567349,0.0020387764,0.003161484,0.00048337592,0.0017384042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008259582,0.00108812,0.0011293219,0.00038581967,0.0022876705,0.002313601,0.0017459798,0.003072726,0.020277698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144723095,0.00063717697,0.0006938904,0.00062907295,0.0032758787,0.0026036792,0.0025981402,0.0039342465,0.0014768027],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.14843756,0.4142889,0.02091681,0.0017252333,0.0007557434,0.001851365,0.016347269,0.010127981,0.15109712,0.12480017,0.011657557,0.0979943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.10824761,0.37689388,0.06446866,0.0003759965,0.0012353342,0.0012915403,0.0071718283,0.0689362,0.056426454,0.2797179,0.03460235,0.00063217327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056151004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005121253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020277698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069070864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012451308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06783569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112918159","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00417.x","title":"SELF‐EMPLOYMENT, EFFICIENCY WAGE, AND PUBLIC POLICIES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Unemployment; Labour economics; Wage; Self-employment; Efficiency wage; Empirical evidence; Unemployment rate; Macroeconomics; Entrepreneurship","score_opus":0.1255887699903297,"score_gpt":0.2590330185811968,"score_spread":0.13344424859086712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112918159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8489223,0.0035185302,0.01842976,0.015890492,0.00009821333,0.00005542754,0.00031916553,0.00009798393,0.1126682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950901,0.00050451094,0.00020916434,0.00011135129,0.000032775366,0.0000062209433,0.000035287263,0.000004649936,0.0040059183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946445,0.00021463817,0.000023547225,0.000051053186,0.00008549246,0.00016070109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961637,0.0016321476,0.0014240231,0.00028866593,0.0002400057,0.00025137683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015976287,0.00014377222,0.0002864649,0.00061395357,0.000457912,0.0017046268,0.0003521513,0.00096452143,0.009378066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056877485,0.00015552375,0.00028045045,0.00074074446,0.0015010351,0.0018042292,0.0006719262,0.0008076213,0.00042687063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017716918,0.00043150785,0.056747325,0.0001087385,0.0000622378,0.00020804719,0.00047113374,0.03812883,0.00020905137,0.8620452,0.0044622705,0.036948413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109782355,0.00022588564,0.070175245,0.00020935522,0.00005238194,0.0003171451,0.0015493861,0.07733245,0.0005431188,0.83154505,0.01790567,0.000034555487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034148847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024256988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009378066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017570835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012383608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031372786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112989045","doi":"10.1093/ei/39.3.365","title":"Habitual and Occasional Lobbyers in the U.S. Steel Industry: An Em Algorithm Pooling Approach","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pooling; Economics; sort; Maximization; Scale (ratio); Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Computer science","score_opus":0.0483394294077415,"score_gpt":0.24084572297167467,"score_spread":0.19250629356393317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112989045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88054335,0.0004444667,0.11501097,0.0007631634,0.000017025399,0.00012531188,0.00095382676,0.0002422396,0.0018996927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681446,0.0001355723,0.027480572,0.00011479229,0.000029676045,0.00013162405,0.002061899,0.000032699736,0.0018686048],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973507,0.0016262794,0.00012559352,0.0005661492,0.000087702494,0.0002436055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817385,0.014221296,0.0016350185,0.0015378133,0.0005254819,0.00034188232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015534275,0.0006107134,0.0011860586,0.0021245081,0.00080641935,0.0013085813,0.0018622192,0.001322523,0.003009236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031736057,0.0005642925,0.0013382433,0.0023448395,0.0007637285,0.0015834112,0.001300197,0.0008059815,0.00064160046],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011003723,0.00077164895,0.4285098,0.00019867693,0.001791209,0.00056661357,0.0011969098,0.31731832,0.0011795863,0.019475253,0.0072721606,0.22061948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007687719,0.00012976809,0.08444153,0.000039142396,0.00024025445,0.000116581235,0.00044319307,0.89244723,0.0005928614,0.019750169,0.001674934,0.000047464273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019625325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016634202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019625325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009407045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079735345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082154095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116777827","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12061","title":"REFERENCE‐DEPENDENT PREFERENCES, LOSS AVERSION, AND LIVE GAME ATTENDANCE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":228,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Loss aversion; Attendance; Outcome (game theory); Economics; League; Prospect theory; Microeconomics; Empirical evidence; Inequity aversion; Empirical research; Econometrics; Event (particle physics); Statistics; Inequality","score_opus":0.04582209432422649,"score_gpt":0.23197909035787861,"score_spread":0.18615699603365213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116777827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6648071,0.00085733377,0.27657327,0.004082905,0.00008118288,0.00019765548,0.0016374413,0.00019843834,0.051564787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780969,0.00038496486,0.006930531,0.00015198128,0.00004329719,0.00007593489,0.0003504814,0.000012949022,0.0139530655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957186,0.00017033832,0.00001434036,0.00008630235,0.000062240615,0.0000949602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984669,0.0008056361,0.00035712778,0.00011439947,0.00009040082,0.00016550526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010352175,0.00068296195,0.0005584435,0.00054094585,0.00037214052,0.0021681685,0.0017894265,0.0018592019,0.014433262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003729372,0.00038070278,0.0008127758,0.0009337492,0.00088621647,0.001862041,0.0009824436,0.001892897,0.0014118743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006025982,0.00086976954,0.048363883,0.00015877142,0.00028610407,0.0012165089,0.0009486413,0.35587,0.0018177549,0.5430532,0.0065453597,0.040267404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013361701,0.00040049435,0.018929563,0.00004786408,0.00014879381,0.00045452168,0.0004911407,0.726306,0.00036824646,0.24669968,0.0059208227,0.00009928258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065845237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005731401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014433262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012857738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004472583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048284054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120416315","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00439.x","title":"GRAVITY REDUX: MEASURING INTERNATIONAL TRADE COSTS WITH PANEL DATA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":532,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; University of Warwick; London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Economics; Redux; Measure (data warehouse); Panel data; Gravity model of trade; Trade barrier; Bilateral trade; International economics; International trade; Gravity equation; Econometrics; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.2665844723257269,"score_gpt":0.2701073832481529,"score_spread":0.0035229109224260147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120416315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5047007,0.0020202731,0.15231745,0.0017609862,0.00015908523,0.0007776418,0.27918047,0.0026926647,0.05639082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8653541,0.000589319,0.05021353,0.00020305424,0.00012143333,0.00060212344,0.07836908,0.00014870803,0.004398584],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788624,0.0009788905,0.00015884156,0.0003341902,0.00049679476,0.00014515639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891878,0.004108145,0.003786377,0.0018571535,0.00079743005,0.00026316548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020830927,0.0006253881,0.00045454616,0.0058422843,0.00033248,0.0017769743,0.0008129056,0.0007979319,0.007728269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015365053,0.00030862392,0.00062515476,0.0087968195,0.00032409458,0.0013040415,0.0010051338,0.00078885915,0.0014783349],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021864232,0.00023243943,0.66646934,0.0004478424,0.00090549135,0.00022662782,0.000334962,0.08222471,0.00084644346,0.03515169,0.074716255,0.1382256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103879094,0.00017497088,0.74048847,0.00018776413,0.00023622949,0.0003832822,0.00053688575,0.15202914,0.0029227033,0.035178706,0.06760282,0.0001551903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01672748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010401907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01672748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009812743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064880506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033260226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124161177","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00149.x","title":"PRICE MATCHING AND THE DOMINO EFFECT IN A RETAIL GASOLINE MARKET","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Gasoline; Domino effect; Economics; Matching (statistics); Competition (biology); Microeconomics; Agricultural economics; Market share; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Finance; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013342752665372326,"score_gpt":0.20761131076522893,"score_spread":0.1942685580998566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124161177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99300224,0.00015969278,0.0006842383,0.00026609644,0.0000042955185,0.000020004716,0.000055119817,0.000018540852,0.0057897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995585,0.00003254267,0.00004509351,0.000016689517,0.000004956416,0.0000017459893,0.000013434085,0.0000012975732,0.00032564515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944955,0.00014625977,0.000025597335,0.00010395028,0.00010770726,0.00016688455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99387896,0.0027733885,0.0022596836,0.00030605533,0.00023900784,0.00054296764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012717794,0.00014619857,0.00054653065,0.0009648849,0.0008539285,0.0018058677,0.0005429747,0.0007767592,0.006222165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011145679,0.00025105797,0.00029358128,0.0014679541,0.0022689851,0.0020527157,0.0010425831,0.00050154416,0.0002714099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044322824,0.0009455499,0.841656,0.00013627564,0.0002594486,0.00174769,0.0025880302,0.028013831,0.0062388866,0.053165432,0.002825794,0.057990845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000577536,0.0006762726,0.8681431,0.00003442646,0.0001710627,0.00037575248,0.004555683,0.07542251,0.0012571611,0.044450566,0.0042357952,0.00010015351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032111723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029324662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032111723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018702041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073269045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06384963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129623343","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00493.x","title":"A CLEAR AND PRESENT MINORITY: HETEROGENEITY IN THE SOURCE OF ENDOWMENTS AND THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC GOODS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Economics; Dimension (graph theory); Public goods game; Microeconomics; Public economics; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.09632670282260061,"score_gpt":0.36014340148143087,"score_spread":0.2638166986588303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129623343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98936963,0.00012003254,0.004030914,0.0007789752,0.000021276519,0.000028928755,0.000045526594,0.000008605383,0.0055960906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871635,0.000028645887,0.0008029522,0.0000924496,0.000010637215,0.000021913036,0.000013290573,0.0000033111578,0.0003105213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966091,0.002084554,0.00012311114,0.0005404135,0.00046182267,0.0001811267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727595,0.01800957,0.00492323,0.00253937,0.00046972837,0.0012985757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005756362,0.00027632486,0.00059106154,0.0003135794,0.0008799005,0.0022290163,0.0006553761,0.0009874997,0.005157962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028999131,0.00027119985,0.00020702701,0.0002763199,0.0031820447,0.00201987,0.0027775564,0.0011832865,0.0003971811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023931425,0.008104849,0.14712527,0.0015752403,0.001031352,0.0012417982,0.014337181,0.021539312,0.261368,0.40712148,0.004962605,0.1076614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033164085,0.012405213,0.2236619,0.00045981634,0.001195362,0.0015603562,0.01822479,0.073174,0.057625484,0.59329236,0.014736474,0.00034793152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043391803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049569254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005756362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064302003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005329893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030442894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129672361","doi":"10.1093/ei/40.1.102","title":"Are the Effects of Monetary Policy Asymmetric?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Recession; Economics; Monetary policy; Interest rate; Monetary economics; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.07229070160981431,"score_gpt":0.2390264573626024,"score_spread":0.1667357557527881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129672361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5410392,0.008478298,0.15486772,0.031482235,0.0010153945,0.00049123005,0.003741776,0.0004098959,0.25847417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800015,0.0043533416,0.0046402644,0.0024035864,0.0007873931,0.00011807664,0.00029468405,0.00006477907,0.007336369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965753,0.0010675557,0.0002965841,0.0005714252,0.0008203621,0.00066882547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779219,0.012357522,0.0061525656,0.0019313436,0.0009263524,0.00071032945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064607253,0.00078338245,0.0021833302,0.0019780225,0.00081817526,0.0032931406,0.0017586447,0.002241269,0.021874726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04035696,0.0007316118,0.0012998285,0.0016280642,0.002142407,0.0069026416,0.0020785895,0.0032175728,0.0021379823],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001591958,0.00039220112,0.027511558,0.00073473965,0.0006879938,0.001117697,0.0006527407,0.04997051,0.0042147865,0.72615135,0.008718295,0.17825617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035503946,0.00016796117,0.024039708,0.0001867347,0.00036881908,0.000361506,0.00031724016,0.037816904,0.00101742,0.9285293,0.006775937,0.0000634441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028654689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025130885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021874726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017866481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095067744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07317823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130344283","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00146.x","title":"GAME THEORY FOR PLAYING GAMES: SOPHISTICATION IN A NEGATIVE‐EXTERNALITY EXPERIMENT","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Economics; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Risk dominance; Externality; Profit maximization; Moral hazard; Game theory; Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Maximization; Experimental economics; Strategic interaction; Utility maximization; Profit (economics); Best response; Incentive; Epsilon-equilibrium","score_opus":0.08465574278075104,"score_gpt":0.4001727410503848,"score_spread":0.31551699826963375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130344283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988025,0.00002389821,0.0053838682,0.00043087482,0.000015146519,0.00023017089,0.000041744897,0.00001780638,0.0058313427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914669,0.000038952192,0.006707486,0.00024339271,0.00001795053,0.00044863106,0.000035262165,0.000011533698,0.0010299643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663687,0.0022542116,0.00019753647,0.0003233747,0.00045326643,0.00013468131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746767,0.016015539,0.0053118384,0.0026200411,0.0004285864,0.000947195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007428499,0.00052072544,0.0003992348,0.00033029186,0.0004554383,0.0017590935,0.0006299897,0.0009869721,0.0047929897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024375744,0.00030884793,0.00021168243,0.0002558266,0.0021001357,0.0018955601,0.0011342982,0.00151288,0.00036642552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02910367,0.057052515,0.13940498,0.0016937751,0.0007066947,0.0011231963,0.022982402,0.027684618,0.20482235,0.40161192,0.007138302,0.106675476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010402291,0.053228933,0.26356125,0.00029498676,0.00042668128,0.0017106553,0.0052923304,0.18090634,0.037525147,0.42220852,0.024045004,0.00039779846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023122123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024495643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007428499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050057797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039337657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039286137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130703695","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12214","title":"THE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY GAP IN EUROPE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Productivity; Economics; Agricultural economics; Agricultural productivity; Gross domestic product; Wage; Value (mathematics); Per capita; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Macroeconomics; Geography; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12053505825848673,"score_gpt":0.25552909969569915,"score_spread":0.13499404143721241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130703695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96649575,0.01473309,0.0012244763,0.0015061123,0.000087178974,0.000009954285,0.0039780294,0.000054804153,0.011910442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952058,0.0016863268,0.00023858262,0.00010616098,0.000056721332,0.0000059593604,0.002062603,0.000008611287,0.0006291219],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902606,0.00015881764,0.00011171947,0.00032126473,0.00018749018,0.00019466595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969754,0.00058578077,0.0016767752,0.00020421011,0.00030340694,0.00025440354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019803755,0.00019925114,0.00038301636,0.0027153185,0.00027765296,0.0022574284,0.00029537332,0.00048373008,0.0019694488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042729895,0.000104522645,0.0003919011,0.0053370707,0.0004783834,0.0013440248,0.0016492625,0.0003959381,0.00032629017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031279124,0.000068998794,0.87953055,0.0004070374,0.00037926383,0.0009631489,0.0016721981,0.0055192513,0.0009004166,0.02117945,0.0076823793,0.081384584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013220197,0.00003996958,0.9723699,0.000114217495,0.000037999933,0.00031754962,0.0006419703,0.00079744734,0.00030443654,0.0029016866,0.02244961,0.00001200109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055485596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002721134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055485596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074371486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061306095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011032522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133497097","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12216","title":"THE QUANTITATIVE IMPORTANCE OF OPENNESS IN DEVELOPMENT","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Industrialisation; Capital good; Openness to experience; Capital (architecture); Prosperity; Open economy; Dual economy; Pace; Capital deepening; Investment (military); Technological change; Capital formation; Market economy; Economic system; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Human capital; Exchange rate; Financial capital; Economic growth; Goods and services","score_opus":0.14935846445690906,"score_gpt":0.2880759449658566,"score_spread":0.13871748050894753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133497097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50465786,0.010826722,0.16524239,0.014919465,0.00039187717,0.00009248323,0.00095969863,0.00037833292,0.30253115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483633,0.0011822622,0.001606278,0.000072870156,0.00008101524,0.000020745549,0.00004488887,0.000014271143,0.0021412792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985671,0.00050357333,0.00007261148,0.00024397868,0.00031956058,0.00029303815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990391,0.0053272326,0.0019127104,0.00092791783,0.0006238556,0.0008171979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019209946,0.00029075623,0.0004084716,0.0018475569,0.00087130757,0.0034604871,0.00042185467,0.000717326,0.0039160512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01208546,0.00023318453,0.0004540767,0.0021075045,0.0062409304,0.00574827,0.0043543703,0.0012509169,0.00026219082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006293224,0.00002275354,0.011138706,0.00016072471,0.000051392315,0.00017528406,0.00037651972,0.014722875,0.00074911315,0.95201296,0.00082487054,0.019701837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013081345,0.00002986222,0.008802428,0.000053533455,0.00001644914,0.00021702751,0.00023076365,0.0044294284,0.0002924725,0.97705346,0.008845013,0.000016568352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011675757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054351526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039160512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019023718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006842529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013802707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138623668","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00322.x","title":"CARROTS AND STICKS: PRIZES AND PUNISHMENTS IN CONTESTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Punishment (psychology); Economics; Microeconomics; Population; Mathematical economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03274469962926691,"score_gpt":0.35036548519297595,"score_spread":0.31762078556370904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138623668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.614925,0.001508395,0.31920025,0.0028366668,0.0002491693,0.00040979337,0.00015888619,0.00019155283,0.060520295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975135,0.00026459433,0.019632412,0.00012937695,0.000043348664,0.00014025976,0.000022110411,0.000024285275,0.004608555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99343395,0.004371365,0.00020812634,0.00051524333,0.0007278559,0.00074352295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97619504,0.016209314,0.0037135521,0.0013031258,0.000705033,0.0018739848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069831586,0.0011777242,0.0017896191,0.0009182881,0.0016606507,0.0041816663,0.0015700355,0.0025691409,0.009796717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038501766,0.00090211316,0.00081185007,0.00091132947,0.0057384106,0.0042627784,0.0021999497,0.0024749567,0.00062448304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013509793,0.00022274563,0.0034776882,0.00032952463,0.0001321573,0.0002982275,0.0008029598,0.11520468,0.0041620494,0.83427405,0.0025314693,0.037213404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039430812,0.00039306615,0.002061864,0.0000657614,0.000051572337,0.00014279586,0.00037531464,0.17945935,0.00066806877,0.81270367,0.0036242323,0.000059993385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015129786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020028872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009796717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002450805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014754696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03693092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138969016","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00445.x","title":"IDENTIFYING THE ROLE OF RISK SHOCKS IN THE BUSINESS CYCLE USING STOCK PRICE DATA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Business cycle; Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium; Technology shock; Econometrics; Dividend; Recession; Risk premium; Stock market; Stock (firearms); Variance decomposition of forecast errors; Financial economics; Monetary economics; Monetary policy; Macroeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.21773307915253695,"score_gpt":0.30552808004004023,"score_spread":0.08779500088750328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138969016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97834617,0.00054465956,0.015044645,0.0009970814,0.0000238953,0.000052659754,0.0024351494,0.00011447332,0.002441274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933884,0.00071349577,0.002825236,0.000062975574,0.000026117475,0.0000142027775,0.0024293337,0.000012490676,0.0005276959],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997062,0.00008774136,0.000032832424,0.000072695766,0.00005946959,0.000041107236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973182,0.0013985084,0.00091522146,0.00010952831,0.000151093,0.000107378815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011504944,0.0005782447,0.0004628702,0.001626793,0.0003198308,0.0016723721,0.0004054671,0.0008709415,0.0010721029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008459859,0.00043482857,0.00050291856,0.0020375368,0.0003120554,0.0012839553,0.0006853744,0.0010539171,0.00030113957],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002340881,0.00019803506,0.59807324,0.000106972286,0.00033350603,0.00042563363,0.00024057107,0.32584497,0.0014556203,0.021186817,0.0038820987,0.048018355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041513904,0.00009233533,0.15903264,0.00007003905,0.00008517255,0.00009592331,0.00017652774,0.8225707,0.00093881885,0.014639363,0.0022130636,0.000043925727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01536545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015731048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01536545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093460985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000487898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03055203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140927714","doi":"10.1093/ei/cbi040","title":"“NEW” PUBLIC INVESTMENT AND/OR PUBLIC CAPITAL MAINTENANCE FOR GROWTH? THE CANADIAN EXPERIENCE","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public capital; Economics; Investment (military); Capital expenditure; Public investment; Capital (architecture); Public economics; Public infrastructure; Capital investment; Labour economics; Finance; Public fund","score_opus":0.08702066101442076,"score_gpt":0.2505918223325007,"score_spread":0.16357116131807997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140927714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5136399,0.017431905,0.00045316646,0.20869453,0.00029375858,0.00001954654,0.0016138798,0.0000416309,0.2578116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741256,0.011525048,0.00019797553,0.0015929004,0.00007224954,0.0000035829764,0.00024098158,0.000013854379,0.012227847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889994,0.000088520064,0.000019863968,0.00005309996,0.00026953375,0.00066899334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709713,0.00035997253,0.00020857886,0.000090979476,0.0010496564,0.0011935867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011849354,0.00018671436,0.0002503433,0.0010177492,0.0044708475,0.0036462883,0.00063408347,0.00081931386,0.006363465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042363885,0.000120982346,0.00018851648,0.0030266764,0.0034314624,0.002581334,0.00093411043,0.0014721972,0.00027607023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034869276,0.00011770148,0.11459993,0.00033387175,0.000038739978,0.0009258027,0.03249812,0.0029578174,0.0011505133,0.54882693,0.13451989,0.16368197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051953415,0.00004330706,0.30249357,0.0005749457,0.000058726757,0.00039817046,0.04907543,0.0020092318,0.0007799525,0.024727922,0.6196835,0.000103363185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9912942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99559045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071261056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071261056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08165074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5170376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142627156","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12199","title":"RISK ASSESSMENT UNDER A NONLINEAR FISCAL POLICY RULE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Solvency; Insolvency; Economics; Fiscal policy; Debt; Nonlinear system; Macroeconomics; Monetary economics; Government debt; Bankruptcy; Government (linguistics); Finance; Market liquidity; Physics","score_opus":0.06673528758368816,"score_gpt":0.30740560021022384,"score_spread":0.24067031262653568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142627156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8511143,0.0002338568,0.13633937,0.001550782,0.00005198332,0.000053827032,0.00018888699,0.000073922245,0.010393061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953614,0.0000906603,0.0029601203,0.000042001073,0.000019370813,0.000009439555,0.000036421734,0.0000065157806,0.0014741957],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903786,0.00034976684,0.0000772375,0.00021292323,0.00018261996,0.00013966604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932201,0.003961448,0.0015393263,0.00036886532,0.00057014043,0.0003401939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003619408,0.0005280758,0.000797472,0.0005008524,0.00036097667,0.0021735644,0.0007131994,0.0012518663,0.0017792874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015697798,0.00027310205,0.0005379646,0.00024134322,0.0014679017,0.0018481656,0.0014027841,0.0014794243,0.00019530619],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003615408,0.00006637654,0.016772334,0.000049926017,0.00008204636,0.00079397217,0.0001724164,0.8135961,0.0023565136,0.15161154,0.00090792886,0.013229286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003398283,0.0000681703,0.0034179045,0.000010492168,0.000020053445,0.000101046404,0.00007873563,0.93028605,0.00052352215,0.06508831,0.00034654685,0.000025264733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035272143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001233879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003619408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010376712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007015463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019141436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143389972","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2001.tb00055.x","title":"Monetary aggregation and the neutrality of money","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Divisia index; Divisia monetary aggregates index; Economics; Cointegration; Currency; Neutrality; Monetary policy; Keynesian economics; Monetary economics; Demand deposit; Watson; Demand for money; Econometrics; Quantitative easing; Central bank; Mathematics; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08015552678909822,"score_gpt":0.24760246808547148,"score_spread":0.16744694129637328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143389972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778309,0.001695644,0.004115151,0.0010397757,0.00011279347,0.000023940114,0.00019109517,0.00003733675,0.014953371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992391,0.00019471452,0.00023227971,0.000031291085,0.00006501378,0.000004762353,0.00007863577,0.0000030495867,0.00015114325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973774,0.0012174215,0.00025877546,0.00036664857,0.00055181346,0.00022799056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760808,0.01014537,0.010108342,0.001453806,0.0015745519,0.0006371611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006756212,0.00040326043,0.0007468872,0.0016846508,0.000925358,0.003846399,0.0004574432,0.0006716912,0.0020006686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029139774,0.00020860863,0.00042652796,0.001841588,0.0019872494,0.003937735,0.0019997281,0.00126554,0.0003283062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039183716,0.00041403878,0.54222333,0.0005160723,0.0010995036,0.0012577532,0.00519844,0.025287293,0.0054702293,0.2804052,0.0037405181,0.13046919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036642115,0.0015116965,0.5872969,0.00030310272,0.0004944207,0.0008378734,0.0043684733,0.04345263,0.005928861,0.33823422,0.017033044,0.00017232352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012983821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004950367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006756212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091563823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005258542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03573072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145535529","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00466.x","title":"THE EFFECTS OF SINGLE MOTHERS' WELFARE USE AND EMPLOYMENT DECISIONS ON CHILDREN'S COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Welfare; Economics; Single mothers; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Cognition; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Test (biology); Labour economics; Developmental psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0373026475440949,"score_gpt":0.2811244426921133,"score_spread":0.24382179514801838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145535529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971693,0.00029140315,0.00009834787,0.00034516156,0.0000065157983,0.0000048062766,0.00070926914,0.0000034405205,0.00137184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744785,0.0002808874,0.00009768036,0.000034596673,0.0000069422176,0.000011071564,0.00034614495,0.0000017123451,0.0017730914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940634,0.00016055387,0.000031879335,0.00007882734,0.000087942455,0.0002343909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264574,0.0030759128,0.003231563,0.00018044976,0.00019976786,0.00066654733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012694527,0.00029775142,0.0002831295,0.00059254165,0.00034404307,0.0008220882,0.0005226459,0.00048358395,0.007140869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050731874,0.0001786915,0.0005701209,0.0008001126,0.0004045694,0.00031768318,0.0009877444,0.0006269487,0.00035238385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021061805,0.0001427059,0.9839871,0.000029616045,0.00015524904,0.00043225763,0.000310384,0.0019593239,0.0003286955,0.0011457079,0.0005680681,0.010730328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011548915,0.00013209459,0.99603146,0.000026456664,0.0000631238,0.00007047236,0.00067296904,0.0017605729,0.0002277676,0.00035424728,0.0006434121,0.0000057878137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03699195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05976757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03699195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011111366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006197388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073553264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151418513","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12318","title":"EVALUATING PENSION PORTABILITY REFORMS: THE TAX REFORM ACT OF 1986 AS A NATURAL EXPERIMENT ABSTRACT","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Vesting; Software portability; Natural experiment; Pension; Legislation; Economics; Public economics; Turnover; Labour economics; Business; Finance; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.2911784723883124,"score_gpt":0.4781660792497897,"score_spread":0.1869876068614773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151418513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922242,0.00012869878,0.0020828603,0.0005581827,0.00016447394,0.0017394704,0.00057722104,0.000029241884,0.0024956265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99138653,0.00010544038,0.002112459,0.00038940998,0.0001554588,0.0034557716,0.00058875576,0.000007121051,0.001799175],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702377,0.025189122,0.000757186,0.0012033066,0.0015925564,0.0010200992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90988183,0.061218213,0.019802006,0.005500059,0.0021577089,0.0014401417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028464606,0.0008517652,0.0012113029,0.00070899236,0.0018698998,0.0024241968,0.0018922717,0.0024661524,0.0040146154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041670997,0.00055530365,0.0010944663,0.0010752954,0.0032146394,0.0015316834,0.0015728665,0.0026762446,0.0007000674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.160575,0.33699143,0.22976202,0.0015888739,0.0043344395,0.0007811041,0.004530582,0.10077291,0.00995048,0.059726704,0.015143325,0.075843066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.09071593,0.30048865,0.3719504,0.00036529763,0.004774707,0.00016076768,0.0076509747,0.12972447,0.025194885,0.035842594,0.032472998,0.00065837847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009376268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008438726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028464606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037196868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003238716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15053701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156897438","doi":"10.1093/ei/cbj019","title":"AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF COMPLIANCE AND LEVERAGE IN AUDITING AND REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; Purdue University; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Enforcement; Audit; Compliance (psychology); Bounded rationality; Rationality; Econometrics; Economics; Microeconomics; Business; Accounting; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06721829254950772,"score_gpt":0.3019875643951509,"score_spread":0.23476927184564317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156897438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947584,0.000076380966,0.0010530143,0.0003165139,0.000026928014,0.000118015494,0.00003559787,0.000015994174,0.003599168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959663,0.000091075235,0.0018865513,0.00020589794,0.000034531124,0.00024542052,0.00004466116,0.000008527277,0.0015169532],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954236,0.0025197042,0.00037159436,0.0006804593,0.00076232833,0.0002423912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9300074,0.04420478,0.016371869,0.0067851087,0.0009127723,0.001718091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055807005,0.0005216318,0.00052449986,0.00044540878,0.0009027335,0.0015415738,0.0008486422,0.0015675551,0.0065382835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037128005,0.00048370077,0.00029343466,0.0004944925,0.002303427,0.0013094747,0.0014030307,0.0018243636,0.000427545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03009939,0.23564605,0.23594719,0.0014394126,0.00093196356,0.0011238431,0.020045917,0.005485894,0.15894601,0.07844271,0.0072975657,0.22459394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014187102,0.17409152,0.56943774,0.0004829656,0.0007794339,0.0023262906,0.009725491,0.04279684,0.059881862,0.09837755,0.027436977,0.00047624714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049737206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000546428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065382835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006429563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000612032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029513896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159623187","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2006.00009.x","title":"HOURS FLEXIBILITY AND RETIREMENT","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Health and Retirement Study; Work (physics); Simple (philosophy); Econometrics; Labour economics; Actuarial science; Demographic economics; Medicine; Engineering; Gerontology","score_opus":0.3146702625368594,"score_gpt":0.4567654421393776,"score_spread":0.14209517960251816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159623187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.935017,0.011016865,0.0036979523,0.0071592866,0.0001566308,0.000043880733,0.004069542,0.00006495433,0.038773846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960989,0.0008823881,0.000112207024,0.00012676245,0.00006832656,0.000008425797,0.00043231205,0.0000031937989,0.0022675642],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945873,0.00016879452,0.000030363679,0.000049510298,0.00011236282,0.0001802001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344325,0.0022437484,0.002941708,0.000263916,0.00018118041,0.0009261268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010085577,0.0002329661,0.0002595638,0.0010004663,0.0004643646,0.0010869881,0.00038225783,0.00077980215,0.01326592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008169166,0.00014249652,0.00044643323,0.0012683463,0.0006796198,0.00063789607,0.0010838287,0.00090947957,0.0008340509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004252586,0.0001391454,0.8317307,0.00018816444,0.00024176536,0.0003500369,0.0010414817,0.025886856,0.00036835365,0.047147922,0.0114769405,0.08100335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002286293,0.00013123763,0.947411,0.00016910053,0.000052526673,0.00030784498,0.0011692041,0.0061112386,0.00012380605,0.02514293,0.019318694,0.000039644223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066199633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008271215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01326592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008750236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035437298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044378877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162451944","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00324.x","title":"EMPLOYERS' ON‐LINE RECRUITMENT AND SCREENING PRACTICES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Employer Branding and e-HRM","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Monster; Line (geometry); Business; Labour economics; Economics; Mathematics; Art","score_opus":0.17764786465311738,"score_gpt":0.3407914423429229,"score_spread":0.16314357768980553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162451944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98631245,0.00039591605,0.00024378239,0.0006059414,0.000012719396,0.000040474002,0.0004408128,0.000021993166,0.011926011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937716,0.00019415171,0.00019635004,0.00013923636,0.00001474313,0.000015458168,0.0003224893,0.000004289734,0.0053416532],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973929,0.0009708554,0.00017104215,0.0002328832,0.00085756124,0.00037465343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703423,0.011606261,0.013676398,0.0011647098,0.0011138492,0.0020965617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023048762,0.00014037541,0.00021048592,0.0015135888,0.00069578295,0.0012260182,0.00056344224,0.0006249877,0.016740818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01672436,0.00021335513,0.00021468377,0.0012811482,0.00033889152,0.0008155548,0.0010991073,0.0004629311,0.0018334228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015248748,0.00043549397,0.9144693,0.00010224051,0.000027862774,0.00021255352,0.0019452373,0.00032737406,0.0006139154,0.0006417881,0.0034420197,0.0776297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005620172,0.00009336897,0.99457526,0.00004747982,0.0000054209154,0.00012135409,0.002060037,0.00031334022,0.00014318712,0.00011332414,0.0025135851,0.000008031069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008936029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018130546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016740818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007887964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007023163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05600363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167924116","doi":"10.1093/ei/cbg001","title":"Transaction Costs and Coalition Stability under Majority Rule","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Transaction cost; Negotiation; Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Economics; Politics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Opportunity cost; Neglect; Database transaction; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06413194145703509,"score_gpt":0.24671527223376466,"score_spread":0.18258333077672956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167924116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83551884,0.0007627698,0.073136434,0.004164522,0.000060867475,0.0001066047,0.00039093947,0.000089406196,0.0857696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938897,0.00014973759,0.0029194017,0.00009202324,0.000048004324,0.000040355782,0.000085446554,0.000013707103,0.0027617156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596006,0.0014027383,0.00024335101,0.00064969924,0.0008750637,0.00086907775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715893,0.014036128,0.0086960895,0.0032054204,0.0014603834,0.0010126667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056491336,0.00030682175,0.0009226499,0.0016821248,0.0016651461,0.0045667924,0.0008947248,0.0012868654,0.013760357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04519892,0.00032984,0.0005748231,0.001741089,0.0040895375,0.0068702786,0.0029175375,0.001433339,0.0007119373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023161033,0.0000758223,0.011750102,0.00006325048,0.00008950176,0.00014703009,0.0005941346,0.025338281,0.0005492675,0.9334277,0.0015156147,0.026217818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007923478,0.000043861968,0.0074230316,0.000022740973,0.000026811389,0.00009237626,0.00046773607,0.033669394,0.00032983732,0.95544606,0.002380072,0.000018864725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026966303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021145209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013760357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002392011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014470691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046032965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170398254","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12479","title":"ENTERTAINING MALTHUS: BREAD, CIRCUSES, AND ECONOMIC GROWTH","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Great Divergence; Industrial Revolution; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Population; Constraint (computer-aided design); Standard of living; Neoclassical economics; Divergence (linguistics); Space (punctuation); Population growth; Economic stagnation; Economic geography; Market economy; Sociology; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.0671221558435794,"score_gpt":0.2617839998856112,"score_spread":0.1946618440420318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170398254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42869636,0.03566109,0.08626919,0.25315955,0.0016888406,0.00008301448,0.0019945663,0.0005655751,0.1918818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774376,0.0070883506,0.0021597466,0.0013533753,0.0005660074,0.000030230976,0.00026835178,0.00005420341,0.01104199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997061,0.0001599225,0.000011003851,0.000045096862,0.000036480138,0.000041471507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978015,0.0012756165,0.0004691129,0.00012851867,0.00017357792,0.00015170433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096114643,0.0003643425,0.00040444813,0.0009462635,0.0011023848,0.0029594402,0.00048483128,0.0010730062,0.009404235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007126083,0.00015929907,0.00038851178,0.0022123756,0.0033525657,0.0052017723,0.0015783078,0.0022709894,0.0006752618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006091268,0.000025817548,0.008888695,0.000083949344,0.000025015303,0.00018592927,0.0007180154,0.009293569,0.00009269139,0.93459386,0.023150075,0.022881458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020288633,0.000018932578,0.0055367425,0.000074112584,0.000016233522,0.00005063085,0.0007931021,0.014146748,0.00011172166,0.954688,0.024517842,0.000025596655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018279742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011143042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018279742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029823752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008080998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036346674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170578520","doi":"10.1093/ei/cbh045","title":"The Good, the Bad, and the Regulator: An Experimental Test of Two Conditional Audit Schemes","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Compliance (psychology); Econometrics; Test (biology); Accounting; Business; Actuarial science; Computer science; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.02697882091524614,"score_gpt":0.26874477310322775,"score_spread":0.2417659521879816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170578520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914483,0.000053606604,0.0014384032,0.000485628,0.000061363346,0.00035985242,0.00016193539,0.000025738225,0.0059652543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933976,0.000066977635,0.0021662912,0.0003237525,0.000049815862,0.00091254903,0.00013818603,0.000016161433,0.0029285515],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99343395,0.0036645522,0.00046778814,0.0009412125,0.0010316427,0.0004608925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89197433,0.081209674,0.015219897,0.008180927,0.0014186294,0.0019965465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010700631,0.0007612417,0.00083093776,0.0005970903,0.0007595605,0.0023419478,0.001881919,0.0028511037,0.011949236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038455833,0.0005670073,0.0005980007,0.0005521452,0.0028555659,0.0027723021,0.0016679801,0.0025913985,0.00078524265],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.22483611,0.30573955,0.054806903,0.001964245,0.0016108375,0.00091382995,0.008174798,0.047151864,0.07695296,0.15995483,0.010839246,0.107054874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07370883,0.36867362,0.15284552,0.0005550027,0.0021529777,0.00052570284,0.005770851,0.16395566,0.051786292,0.15123664,0.028122602,0.0006662853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010545318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070255663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011949236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011007405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001112236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056591034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202879232","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12816","title":"AFTER THE TOURNAMENT: OUTCOMES AND EFFORT PROVISION","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Arkansas","keywords":"Tournament; Earnings; Economics; Inequity aversion; Microeconomics; Loss aversion; Labour economics; Inequality; Finance","score_opus":0.024455679179238892,"score_gpt":0.32658018697482494,"score_spread":0.30212450779558603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202879232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99047613,0.00008010294,0.0007747294,0.00021331184,0.000022008928,0.000020994357,0.00008025067,0.000012278421,0.008320247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970228,0.000028546003,0.00017192177,0.000054330143,0.000010126504,0.000012970526,0.00007898404,0.000005296685,0.0026150744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994584,0.00023633553,0.000027527465,0.00008119789,0.00008154539,0.00011507643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960592,0.0010629068,0.0013302221,0.0003322043,0.00016844818,0.0010469556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011279124,0.00023566998,0.000257972,0.00025103835,0.0004102714,0.0016986803,0.00030142363,0.00058789976,0.011636733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005638865,0.00011758795,0.000114868286,0.0003054249,0.00048056533,0.00043881958,0.00067308784,0.0006450204,0.0009860472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009683509,0.008363613,0.73418623,0.00022438237,0.000317848,0.00069642224,0.0016980759,0.0051240767,0.046895064,0.022975316,0.005828081,0.1640073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084752166,0.001677689,0.98650485,0.000023914863,0.000036501824,0.00006467324,0.0006150435,0.0024770363,0.0013292683,0.004807478,0.002358157,0.000020697242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012449186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033038822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011636733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046031995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029054785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038928747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240505261","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12096","title":"RISING R&amp;D INTENSITY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Gross domestic product; Per capita; Competition (biology); R&D intensity; Phenomenon; Monetary economics; Growth model; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.0483470794646016,"score_gpt":0.23166326551235478,"score_spread":0.18331618604775318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240505261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8569151,0.0064274105,0.013072039,0.010454335,0.000103864855,0.000043809487,0.001704964,0.0003309736,0.110947385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925997,0.0016820519,0.0005860083,0.00016781368,0.00006397151,0.0000069099506,0.00030823125,0.000011794286,0.0045734146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965394,0.00007631803,0.000029047033,0.000079856676,0.00008741173,0.00007339734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590576,0.0011133883,0.0021525132,0.0001564289,0.0003239159,0.00034798845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067315425,0.00021698179,0.00019398218,0.00094994996,0.00031279022,0.0023435636,0.00036830845,0.00088433793,0.006104386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047565317,0.00012801612,0.00025041203,0.0019986208,0.0009886181,0.0013224619,0.00087340054,0.00079807907,0.0015964684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023526065,0.00020213907,0.53873926,0.00038499254,0.00012227123,0.0011409357,0.0008898107,0.04979452,0.002903659,0.2248887,0.021551564,0.159147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007212452,0.0002572583,0.6138445,0.0002412412,0.00011350773,0.0016116241,0.0024323289,0.07485509,0.0028030758,0.20490667,0.098764345,0.0000981893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004155879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023709903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006104386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001486202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054488465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020421207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243431799","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12455","title":"CITATIONS OR JOURNAL QUALITY: WHICH IS REWARDED MORE IN THE ACADEMIC LABOR MARKET?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Prestige; Quality (philosophy); Publishing; Economics; POLK; Affect (linguistics); Demographic economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Psychology; History; Law","score_opus":0.8029192847958765,"score_gpt":0.6650213172577557,"score_spread":0.13789796753812078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243431799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89681524,0.008002505,0.0035018981,0.04713555,0.0005333087,0.0000761836,0.00091542635,0.00016451733,0.042855393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99384016,0.0007063556,0.0002351819,0.0014216163,0.0004205417,0.00001224769,0.00012428807,0.000042152362,0.0031973773],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975349,0.00072758645,0.00014894185,0.00044439282,0.0005986881,0.0005453649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9416611,0.02309114,0.021136828,0.0016390713,0.0027097666,0.009762176],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005358737,0.00032092762,0.0012911482,0.002310595,0.0012390729,0.0071979063,0.0010398013,0.0027905246,0.022767933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041583385,0.00024684588,0.0007239542,0.0042181127,0.003407875,0.0050021587,0.001883428,0.0017872986,0.0024506815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019574114,0.0012197108,0.7691106,0.00069176947,0.0005225783,0.000358733,0.0016056651,0.002354047,0.0029011301,0.061472915,0.014310748,0.14349465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025708904,0.00075873896,0.86173123,0.00021276326,0.00027049362,0.00029606555,0.003885931,0.00566993,0.0007369051,0.11620259,0.009857463,0.000120846875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040775086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003822237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026061002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017532988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07616633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254842216","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12471","title":"AN OPEN‐ECONOMY MODEL WITH MONEY, ENDOGENOUS SEARCH, AND HETEROGENEOUS FIRMS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Matching (statistics); Inflation (cosmology); Market power; Open economy; Microeconomics; Small open economy; Search cost; Friedman rule; Monetary economics; Monetary policy; Exchange rate","score_opus":0.1251674084466321,"score_gpt":0.2808367005852314,"score_spread":0.1556692921385993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254842216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46419424,0.00362535,0.3004954,0.0206908,0.00054167985,0.00026302328,0.0030817369,0.00038212002,0.2067256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.942753,0.0009877704,0.008155874,0.00034673983,0.00015404972,0.00015959807,0.0002573564,0.000023373925,0.047162097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951386,0.00019250555,0.000024985768,0.000097458775,0.00007825306,0.00009289689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979248,0.0011250833,0.00034259114,0.00014095611,0.0001380327,0.00032847028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009406512,0.00047746958,0.0011030361,0.0007127839,0.00095437333,0.0032468645,0.0025604737,0.003497469,0.012031585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040187812,0.0004802881,0.0007952819,0.0011622516,0.0019709368,0.0046123625,0.0018824287,0.0017840941,0.0011826858],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018025559,0.00017064156,0.000986017,0.000070362534,0.000041362662,0.00058619236,0.00018657139,0.1997803,0.00041820208,0.7891784,0.002930618,0.0054710335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003240002,0.000113568334,0.00069800805,0.00003592582,0.00004461125,0.00021966177,0.00025220372,0.6700099,0.00013555457,0.32113597,0.0069787703,0.000051770297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063121836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035548883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012031585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014839607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011336203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040249646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264694928","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13070","title":"Property crime and private protection allocation within cities: Theory and evidence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Institut Universitaire de France; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Property crime; Public economics; Economics; Race (biology); Business; Violent crime; Criminology","score_opus":0.11732261814287989,"score_gpt":0.3471046999621355,"score_spread":0.2297820818192556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264694928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9527613,0.0040342,0.0038659945,0.0066106035,0.000029167126,0.000057235575,0.00092367636,0.000043363834,0.031674422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859065,0.0005679559,0.00023782942,0.00007808086,0.000011330008,0.000006816945,0.00010527219,0.0000043830673,0.00039774747],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819523,0.0006400086,0.000054733257,0.00035012834,0.00033566638,0.00042421164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97925776,0.009138855,0.0053354967,0.0022651004,0.0029591485,0.0010436168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022822288,0.00040505332,0.0008517892,0.002949435,0.00236625,0.004040696,0.0019674571,0.0011881369,0.0079918755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013389485,0.00053206977,0.00073098735,0.0045955493,0.007955764,0.0017624098,0.0022834048,0.00132749,0.00026420638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030042074,0.00038698575,0.77769774,0.00027624963,0.0007372009,0.00023923928,0.0018636372,0.02237074,0.00011772789,0.15876095,0.0042697443,0.032979447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016204637,0.00011111462,0.8678808,0.000334356,0.00061179465,0.00009857136,0.00641756,0.042411108,0.0002708843,0.07422474,0.007415,0.0000619505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71819955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59802896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71819955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014478873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006653125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56692004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282350425","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12557","title":"HORIZONTAL MERGERS IN THE PRESENCE OF CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Capacity utilization; Economics; Marginal cost; Microeconomics; Constant (computer programming); Constraint (computer-aided design); Aggregate (composite); Monetary economics; Industrial organization; Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06089355482240256,"score_gpt":0.2522902159802127,"score_spread":0.19139666115781012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282350425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9285025,0.0007436534,0.03045568,0.0021893468,0.00006115222,0.000060023096,0.00011818737,0.00008077368,0.037788805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964804,0.0001735691,0.00060248317,0.000058384845,0.000022718488,0.000007292425,0.000015668875,0.000003746283,0.0026356599],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914193,0.00027564465,0.000022530901,0.00007964317,0.00008042368,0.00039985566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952991,0.0021186066,0.0014705476,0.00018253457,0.00020359979,0.0007255466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012981602,0.00060333114,0.00088285195,0.00062935654,0.0013316427,0.0026950496,0.0010125726,0.0020399708,0.011169539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040830756,0.0006033332,0.00084759406,0.00080421346,0.0024497432,0.0034364006,0.0021020772,0.0019499795,0.000551292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049486896,0.00041681385,0.009657663,0.00012539189,0.00017159205,0.00243281,0.00054592616,0.493451,0.0028854525,0.47601923,0.0032604137,0.010538879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030734076,0.00031797227,0.0063171876,0.000042546773,0.00014959762,0.00034309924,0.0010109447,0.8122198,0.00087786,0.17513475,0.0031879027,0.00009101722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021553995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015439513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021553995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023148828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011865557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04285705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293200016","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12321","title":"THE ECONOMICS OF EXOGAMOUS MARRIAGE IN SMALL‐SCALE SOCIETIES","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Exogamy; Endogamy; Subsistence agriculture; Economics; Productivity; Agriculture; Geography; Sociology; Population; Economic growth; Demography","score_opus":0.04321783597473149,"score_gpt":0.2779850987710347,"score_spread":0.23476726279630322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293200016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76326114,0.00502015,0.037306126,0.021134073,0.00010794585,0.000059706217,0.000416543,0.00005379048,0.17264053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926924,0.0012764259,0.0004686012,0.0001589654,0.00004905923,0.000016376056,0.000021422375,0.0000047283015,0.0053120167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996973,0.00017698716,0.0000073970746,0.000026390393,0.000038700022,0.000053198735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790096,0.0013030493,0.00037281663,0.000088299734,0.00008801858,0.00024689568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079927355,0.00012473136,0.00028389663,0.00043638807,0.0010810137,0.0019736155,0.0004464458,0.0010954734,0.008166894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004286319,0.00020264526,0.00019221101,0.0006623959,0.0031817819,0.002846198,0.0012818334,0.0009309899,0.00038231048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007319765,0.00004896901,0.008973831,0.000064558386,0.000019346951,0.0003094736,0.00043321608,0.020762468,0.00030813657,0.9515652,0.0041894447,0.013252196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032222746,0.00004085903,0.012070125,0.000048395326,0.000017164562,0.00021343898,0.0014122888,0.032766566,0.000092661285,0.9444348,0.008851656,0.000019787669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032844828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034795299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008166894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020522343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005902526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027320921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295485480","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12328","title":"BERTRAND COMPETITION WITH ASYMMETRIC MARGINAL COSTS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Bertrand competition; Marginal cost; Duopoly; Microeconomics; Bertrand paradox (economics); Intuition; Perfect competition; Marginal utility; Marginal profit; Econometrics; Competition (biology); Mathematical economics; Oligopoly; Cournot competition","score_opus":0.025060646075066653,"score_gpt":0.2200393814818095,"score_spread":0.19497873540674282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295485480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8885648,0.0002934044,0.0643236,0.0020391839,0.0000927312,0.0002233127,0.00013574329,0.00014450472,0.04418267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959544,0.000066073095,0.0027329852,0.00007275141,0.000019006522,0.000040620864,0.000014576949,0.000003725506,0.0010958001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668247,0.0021059276,0.000079699756,0.00027118484,0.00046551833,0.00039520732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98383594,0.01183024,0.0017185356,0.0011314182,0.0006057116,0.00087807485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040208376,0.00072296726,0.0012959507,0.0007610219,0.0011151737,0.0032975886,0.0020714132,0.0018323576,0.0045611705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0167777,0.00048065057,0.0008168104,0.0005213679,0.003947902,0.003172179,0.0015096255,0.0020851386,0.00030687088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058998616,0.00045631983,0.0010127515,0.00011802142,0.00006655116,0.00020891355,0.00018139544,0.12718786,0.0021621913,0.8630961,0.000917678,0.0040023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004939838,0.00023920664,0.0009332024,0.00001646567,0.00003370873,0.000060962768,0.00012643458,0.66038674,0.0008892921,0.33585373,0.0009057609,0.000060454724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070669227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036787204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070669227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003621434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016641414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026275456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296467323","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12433","title":"EFFECTS OF WELFARE REFORM ON WOMEN'S VOTING PARTICIPATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Welfare reform; Welfare; Economics; Incentive; Demographic economics; Turnout; Population; Presidential system; Democracy; Public economics; Labour economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Politics; Demography; Market economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.032354383536765556,"score_gpt":0.31581000280238075,"score_spread":0.2834556192656152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296467323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955819,0.00032921083,0.000111789894,0.00064280175,0.000021516636,0.000017956472,0.00036114966,0.0000044874832,0.0029291466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876666,0.00011289026,0.000028508852,0.00007128032,0.000018717863,0.000008951496,0.00016027584,0.0000010439169,0.0008316913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854976,0.0007089395,0.00006232885,0.00014021744,0.00012744473,0.00041121582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950117,0.0014589634,0.0026673449,0.00018600682,0.0002552477,0.00042081505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018728522,0.00018197388,0.0003048434,0.00060451025,0.0005781427,0.00072431477,0.00028616216,0.00037699172,0.0047647916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075817313,0.00010210338,0.0005533055,0.00081378175,0.0005099951,0.0004352582,0.000929528,0.00057628675,0.00033416867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005290597,0.00030644838,0.97402996,0.000039014005,0.00011994708,0.00008467498,0.0009183116,0.00047184582,0.0004895597,0.0010192111,0.00082246965,0.021169493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081005655,0.00019037457,0.99745506,0.000012122885,0.000039411912,0.0000130292965,0.0006937903,0.0001598495,0.0002040661,0.00011211842,0.0011094675,0.0000025354498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018290302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030614452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018290302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010050596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006002145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036367714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336529691","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12344","title":"INTEGRATING MARKET ALTERNATIVES INTO THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF OPTIMAL DETERRENCE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Economics; Deterrence (psychology); Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Microeconomics; Deterrence theory; Maximization; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03664326103578679,"score_gpt":0.2465113949051027,"score_spread":0.2098681338693159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336529691","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053116616,0.007672745,0.6907925,0.023288146,0.00059913803,0.0001439831,0.00028773054,0.00010595529,0.22399324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94167113,0.0045873597,0.03711252,0.00076077715,0.00062522135,0.0002655392,0.00008721999,0.00004228783,0.014847859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975074,0.0013801169,0.000087180204,0.00018936039,0.00061259465,0.00022333866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614847,0.0027554736,0.00031379604,0.0002219387,0.00038546536,0.0001749609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033036293,0.00072229584,0.00083914766,0.0014041723,0.0010271143,0.0033855734,0.0014890054,0.002397585,0.007075709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00916798,0.00036873567,0.0008833538,0.0013339396,0.004615836,0.0047832965,0.0019566938,0.0026264188,0.000522896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028713785,0.0000073998867,0.000048723974,0.0000149443895,0.0000035631804,0.000012476435,0.00001734415,0.012547248,0.000013418019,0.9855327,0.00032973086,0.0014696356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057374527,0.0000054311063,0.000043497916,0.000010675413,0.0000013596101,0.0000066472394,0.000022082177,0.021621661,0.000010628602,0.97681797,0.001450457,0.000003890093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031046474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024968286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007075709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035153164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023856077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025505543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507746587","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12741","title":"MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICY DESIGN AT THE ZERO LOWER BOUND: EVIDENCE FROM THE LAB","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"FP7 Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Liquidity trap; Economics; Market liquidity; Zero lower bound; Fiscal policy; Monetary policy; Monetary economics; Inflation (cosmology); Inflation targeting; Macroeconomics; Liquidity risk; Physics","score_opus":0.13558202658876473,"score_gpt":0.27450317636521776,"score_spread":0.13892114977645303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507746587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766285,0.0008340501,0.008208767,0.0017819118,0.00011961029,0.00011779228,0.00026148965,0.0001146486,0.011933223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484766,0.00040601872,0.002516112,0.00055138976,0.000035938094,0.00014254228,0.00014919938,0.000023152756,0.0013279859],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984377,0.0009533624,0.00008363702,0.0002642196,0.00015068956,0.00011039877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97976834,0.013029875,0.0037639802,0.0020329058,0.0006622546,0.0007426186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043330444,0.00044000964,0.0005132958,0.00019561966,0.0004352578,0.0016557666,0.0009531811,0.0010626945,0.007626405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023037644,0.00021422758,0.00026328626,0.00024604652,0.0015608468,0.0011685175,0.000775302,0.0013351451,0.0010853925],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07091629,0.04478319,0.10057471,0.002902132,0.0018166682,0.0005290008,0.0020558012,0.064658776,0.080992855,0.10890313,0.02556163,0.4963058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020299645,0.05624248,0.19750151,0.0010145456,0.0023317584,0.00045978717,0.0027863986,0.18533088,0.107671015,0.37174866,0.054082774,0.000530519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009913062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005950641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007626405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061916263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007517164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025512874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515636638","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12384","title":"A THEORY OF TURNOVER AND WAGE DYNAMICS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Boom; Economics; Wage; Labour economics; Productivity; Turnover; Efficiency wage; Business cycle; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.02937610406995821,"score_gpt":0.2295301978326333,"score_spread":0.20015409376267507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515636638","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11987107,0.0035262068,0.7188134,0.014275449,0.00046686633,0.00014137712,0.0015465297,0.00039138546,0.14096773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9005432,0.0029670037,0.026602898,0.0009913123,0.000739417,0.00030521685,0.0006906596,0.000089507776,0.067070715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944276,0.00015505243,0.00002413789,0.000111165034,0.00012829303,0.00013850223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835855,0.0008080709,0.00033992436,0.00014109245,0.00017629746,0.00017608574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001282645,0.0004922246,0.0008104263,0.0009286573,0.0010835619,0.0024309093,0.0021785663,0.0024690293,0.01886241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063584433,0.0004515555,0.0008844273,0.0014366378,0.0015206359,0.0035874918,0.00097429025,0.0020963307,0.0029066657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019982066,0.000053444448,0.0027650895,0.000035546174,0.000017844954,0.00013197196,0.0003122807,0.045892134,0.00016773291,0.9308593,0.0058948253,0.013849822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033172808,0.000027156519,0.0018495374,0.000035483285,0.000010053348,0.00017471117,0.00013109169,0.2099153,0.000037898484,0.7776725,0.010094713,0.000018287592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033928535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01886241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017478124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012414242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06310099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548289245","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12754","title":"MANAGING RISK TAKING WITH INTEREST RATE POLICY AND MACROPRUDENTIAL REGULATIONS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; University of Alberta; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Western University","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Economics; Interest rate; Monetary economics; Capital requirement; Macroprudential regulation; Systemic risk; Macroeconomics; Microeconomics; Financial crisis; Incentive","score_opus":0.03768275370002463,"score_gpt":0.27332685722978833,"score_spread":0.2356441035297637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548289245","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44518253,0.0012729813,0.4575731,0.011560589,0.0001966302,0.00021926209,0.0004959952,0.00051500386,0.082983956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98695475,0.0004117179,0.0053242208,0.00018292926,0.00006716358,0.000059696547,0.000035300458,0.000020808828,0.006943513],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987098,0.00052384514,0.000052548807,0.00025185593,0.00016476525,0.0002972295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957385,0.0016216442,0.0017352583,0.00030632867,0.0002721887,0.00032603665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023062932,0.0008387564,0.000989649,0.00043824772,0.0005614986,0.003730077,0.0016433556,0.003458728,0.004242238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077910307,0.0005999946,0.0011514572,0.0004296704,0.0026226467,0.003392665,0.0017090768,0.0026947022,0.0006757688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013361496,0.00019304948,0.002507616,0.00005721804,0.00005571,0.00040389498,0.00016739359,0.5100137,0.002139966,0.4754952,0.0014351803,0.007397584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017449798,0.00015472865,0.0015524043,0.000037966554,0.00007506976,0.0001244288,0.0001221891,0.7906454,0.00095231656,0.2030265,0.003081352,0.00005304386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055225356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021518131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055225356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024516713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00214992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017788231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W258900830","doi":"","title":"Editor's Report: Economic Inquiry","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Innovations in Educational Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Variety (cybernetics); Economics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0695539095872793,"score_gpt":0.43823386926217794,"score_spread":0.36867995967489864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W258900830","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025197596,0.038481515,0.0009188457,0.18851301,0.7447519,0.00014317033,0.00138137,0.00023136496,0.0253268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056418516,0.05682605,0.0023960643,0.06317166,0.7614874,0.00053874264,0.0016732116,0.00061072694,0.10765433],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97618246,0.005752362,0.0030230049,0.0021258867,0.011642153,0.0012741322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8725579,0.048690632,0.0061427364,0.006974595,0.058788486,0.0068456954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026602622,0.0028754906,0.0032950586,0.009407891,0.003677635,0.01865425,0.0042376355,0.010914778,0.064888336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12378532,0.0009904169,0.0022072773,0.010617616,0.0025691544,0.0073117195,0.0037484001,0.010476716,0.039248392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011665126,0.000009267375,0.00006379463,0.00016221339,0.000008811683,0.000019074794,0.000020166353,0.000026045313,0.000010181629,0.0015998106,0.9925804,0.005488647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021174625,0.000015891734,0.00052258023,0.0007339939,0.000017682394,0.000041141157,0.0000846754,0.00014172836,0.000048483205,0.0028209635,0.9955361,0.000015722368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017625551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018637327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064888336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006201748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010218397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21707308},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2593367887","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12446","title":"THE EFFECTS OF MACROECONOMIC CONDITIONS AT GRADUATION ON OVEREDUCATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Unemployment; Economics; Apprenticeship; Instrumental variable; German; Labour economics; Percentage point; Underemployment; Panel data; Demographic economics; Affect (linguistics); Point (geometry); Econometrics; Psychology; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.03223053547981874,"score_gpt":0.28436886533145034,"score_spread":0.2521383298516316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593367887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968087,0.0006336363,0.00008694144,0.00030086804,0.000018908679,0.000008080908,0.0006377497,0.000005632218,0.0014993602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984107,0.00018380978,0.000020401932,0.000038296188,0.000020876729,0.000003480062,0.00046189816,0.0000026792002,0.000857886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995654,0.00008079,0.000024209927,0.00005383905,0.000046011643,0.00022978416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966834,0.0005591782,0.0012868166,0.00017990859,0.0001787056,0.0011119053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006769248,0.00020113031,0.000374933,0.0005907127,0.00046226085,0.0009690579,0.00026881555,0.0004929423,0.0057977256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029421356,0.000118938384,0.00061363063,0.0006938229,0.00038329052,0.00034877396,0.001172594,0.000869558,0.0008783993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004878752,0.00019387847,0.9891868,0.000019627303,0.00009176661,0.00014880212,0.00011610691,0.00049269566,0.00035289393,0.00037775186,0.0004621022,0.008069627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019091701,0.00004894265,0.99951625,0.0000032881753,0.000009568255,0.000011266367,0.00007077917,0.00007460884,0.000033562294,0.0000613629,0.0001669635,0.0000015638556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008274802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008957507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008274802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047284947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036930206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019395292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735436629","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12863","title":"THE IMPACT OF RETURN ON COLLATERAL IN A CHANNEL SYSTEM","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Economics; Interbank lending market; Interest rate; Rate of return; Monetary policy; Monetary economics; Econometric model; Cutoff; Econometrics; Financial economics; Finance","score_opus":0.06354706809972362,"score_gpt":0.2570797022495961,"score_spread":0.19353263414987248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735436629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99341774,0.00011395694,0.0018210599,0.00028584746,0.000006054,0.000011698148,0.00011032211,0.000032473577,0.004200838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952865,0.00003470795,0.000101707315,0.0000075383023,0.000005793028,0.0000019206807,0.000030306812,0.0000025548666,0.00028679427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981717,0.00088238955,0.0001417292,0.00019087835,0.00029265712,0.0003207381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9447349,0.022837946,0.024569433,0.0025191426,0.0030577923,0.002280803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027120165,0.00021759793,0.00035422842,0.0010321985,0.00043269873,0.0027687661,0.0004425744,0.00084301137,0.007117869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03387155,0.00015937808,0.0002593649,0.0011739832,0.0014461935,0.0030159657,0.001107665,0.0010073142,0.0006058655],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014675368,0.0005710086,0.8099429,0.00013726573,0.00020777623,0.0011423194,0.0008578171,0.08375199,0.0044914377,0.06015922,0.001961722,0.035308998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000201071,0.0016007214,0.7233637,0.00015048252,0.00041570366,0.00088707043,0.0023290801,0.21363485,0.0056435633,0.047746472,0.0039000513,0.00012716437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025893608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015200669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007117869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013573142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006110071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023811638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736017287","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12879","title":"THE EXTENT OF THE MARKET AND INTEGRATION THROUGH FACTOR MARKETS: EVIDENCE FROM WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Northwestern University","keywords":"Autarky; Economics; Factor market; Electricity; Electricity market; Market integration; Microeconomics; International economics; Monetary economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.12630247242994735,"score_gpt":0.256899873025652,"score_spread":0.13059740059570463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736017287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848918,0.00042598127,0.0011752291,0.0003141696,0.0000035916844,0.000009903426,0.00011122722,0.00001464504,0.013053456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927884,0.00017939476,0.00012310881,0.000020332849,0.0000066234456,0.000001669837,0.000060148428,0.0000029980201,0.0003268672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996056,0.00011952112,0.00003239276,0.00009763788,0.00008684739,0.000058011505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915283,0.0035803088,0.0033807382,0.0006198449,0.0006196501,0.0002711666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007485271,0.00012577498,0.0003352606,0.0006486421,0.00047947819,0.001835237,0.000338395,0.00040659498,0.0066437307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065790922,0.0001717896,0.00024176469,0.0014717354,0.0016554309,0.0024211223,0.001031057,0.00048333305,0.00045955396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015084243,0.0006068165,0.8312948,0.0003112805,0.00062961766,0.0012180873,0.0028106046,0.010244083,0.0039265067,0.070888184,0.0025092594,0.07405245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001865235,0.00029342866,0.9345618,0.00009252589,0.00025391084,0.00034241026,0.0037978033,0.009740567,0.0020518026,0.040884193,0.007749118,0.000045941655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007285994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008759114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007285994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004318984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002343976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022225559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750146189","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12490","title":"PRICES, INFLATION, AND SMOKING ONSET: THE CASE OF ARGENTINA","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Smoking Behavior and Cessation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Economics; Inflation (cosmology); Hazard; Hyperinflation; Monetary economics; Hazard ratio; Econometrics; Monetary policy; Medicine","score_opus":0.05738164485280651,"score_gpt":0.3358238233053572,"score_spread":0.2784421784525507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750146189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938998,0.001326691,0.00032547343,0.0016438648,0.00001591145,0.000010519595,0.00031136192,0.000007459239,0.0024588453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802846,0.0007443441,0.00014208873,0.00006962113,0.000034978268,0.0000072018292,0.00036822603,0.000005320571,0.0005997577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940133,0.00029246038,0.000030767267,0.000051390525,0.00006282223,0.00016126479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968284,0.0015359198,0.00101415,0.000092339185,0.00022159259,0.00030765613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012635111,0.00019353842,0.00055616203,0.0006249794,0.0006563112,0.0015656204,0.00047713335,0.0009411062,0.002328818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004803758,0.00024922326,0.00039229824,0.0014854203,0.00053403305,0.0006883236,0.0008451154,0.0014770025,0.00021677212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059741887,0.0005881817,0.9674704,0.00007584945,0.00019617869,0.0014361406,0.0016229859,0.004503993,0.00050431915,0.006131637,0.0024505095,0.0144222835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010887694,0.00023240464,0.97160393,0.00005764126,0.00014652587,0.00040188027,0.0029527836,0.016804868,0.0002040244,0.0036221882,0.0038319496,0.000032842403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1382958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10197962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1382958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015642451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006081739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27498168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755282745","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12934","title":"HIGH SCHOOL CHOICES AND THE GENDER GAP IN <scp>STEM</scp>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Ministère de l’Éducation, Gouvernement de l’Ontario; McMaster University","keywords":"Gender gap; Cohort; Mathematics education; Stem cell; Psychology; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics; Biology","score_opus":0.08465876082657402,"score_gpt":0.270473697073116,"score_spread":0.185814936246542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755282745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99244046,0.00027739973,0.00010051189,0.00076618016,0.000010634213,0.0000084725625,0.0015712446,0.0000062747545,0.00481872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760664,0.00010085288,0.000021423746,0.000039596605,0.0000061108058,0.0000030235915,0.0005448352,0.0000023334399,0.001675126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995377,0.000062542,0.000018547937,0.00006992292,0.000102031845,0.00020932122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608684,0.0008562831,0.0015307377,0.00012074761,0.00025571583,0.0011496512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007985948,0.00011960268,0.0002270438,0.00087453227,0.00076436886,0.0011680835,0.00038481646,0.0003997493,0.012093524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038333444,0.00012147387,0.00028881646,0.0014491321,0.0007642213,0.000389756,0.0006674382,0.00045260438,0.0008635112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054680117,0.000030056763,0.9923441,0.00001012206,0.000022813245,0.00007755864,0.0008521578,0.00009848815,0.00011775533,0.0011182975,0.0011288972,0.0041450313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066454513,0.000019555404,0.9964174,0.000014121355,0.000006571031,0.000035577137,0.0014874585,0.00021637799,0.000044263208,0.0003690439,0.0013793703,0.0000034798513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29206395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4412997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29206395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013847532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016269067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58072793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771224957","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12531","title":"ASSIMILATION IN THE RISK PREFERENCES OF SPOUSES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Assortative mating; Economics; Preference; Correlation; Econometrics; Risk aversion (psychology); Microeconomics; Demographic economics; Mating; Expected utility hypothesis; Biology; Financial economics; Ecology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13106028143469556,"score_gpt":0.3734627799807295,"score_spread":0.24240249854603396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771224957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962058,0.000041985422,0.0009829885,0.000042060565,0.0000020035604,0.000004432217,0.0000705547,0.000002322671,0.0026478462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994216,0.0000240494,0.00015154471,0.000008740729,0.0000019121399,0.0000012413813,0.000039291983,4.6497402e-7,0.0003511484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995229,0.00020678717,0.00003378484,0.000082545324,0.00009882756,0.00005519515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745744,0.0008859098,0.0009799065,0.0003346982,0.00017807799,0.00016398558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012593522,0.0001173751,0.0002086512,0.0004012618,0.0003095991,0.00096906524,0.00013344864,0.00018087453,0.0036999348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059054843,0.00010371092,0.00015728861,0.0005318624,0.00042661396,0.00041126704,0.00083685864,0.00031501107,0.0003361454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014681651,0.000073534495,0.9559514,0.00001952365,0.000109554785,0.0002435317,0.0025076442,0.0030382038,0.0022462318,0.010704788,0.00020863712,0.024750128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010361964,0.00015663575,0.97210354,0.000017775115,0.000046091336,0.00041037725,0.0034780852,0.007662712,0.0009823262,0.013461188,0.0016436795,0.000027147427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001633715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018640822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036999348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025596932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013708197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0123775005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789363929","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12751","title":"EARLY EVIDENCE ON RECREATIONAL MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION AND TRAFFIC FATALITIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Recreation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Cannabis; Environmental health; Demographic economics; Economics; Geography; Medicine; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.07288600530475496,"score_gpt":0.3465147545874778,"score_spread":0.27362874928272285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789363929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9544731,0.009810591,0.0010197846,0.007899321,0.00012623216,0.00005457178,0.0078482,0.000026150485,0.018742207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870184,0.00472627,0.00014774539,0.00044021718,0.00018261527,0.00001652978,0.0036779824,0.0000062071513,0.0037839955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987286,0.00040928612,0.000121129866,0.00022656881,0.00033420508,0.00018025558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97696507,0.009809111,0.00895129,0.0006356592,0.002761511,0.00087745656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001755611,0.00022460753,0.00025707675,0.0023550158,0.0008196595,0.0014433119,0.00055433484,0.0006048333,0.013614746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01421637,0.00027080585,0.00037648747,0.0031360849,0.0009340624,0.0007592255,0.0009117997,0.00069662486,0.00066469214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024026516,0.00006943798,0.98153645,0.00019536847,0.00020825128,0.00018238187,0.00029393774,0.00061323965,0.000115881776,0.0031001295,0.0043685613,0.009076068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008424141,0.000042610463,0.99369437,0.00011460627,0.00006663049,0.00006975354,0.0006723248,0.00047481156,0.000112766225,0.00043159578,0.0043041157,0.000007836378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11548591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10927124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11548591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014800155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009250653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22962743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800614939","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12584","title":"PARLIAMENT SHAPES AND SIZES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Parliament; Economics; Ignorance; Power (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Mathematical economics; Law; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.07635561762603908,"score_gpt":0.3673472943881611,"score_spread":0.290991676762122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800614939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.374469,0.00060205517,0.028363535,0.0067890035,0.00016336872,0.00005311439,0.00073962513,0.00034778463,0.58847255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774041,0.00013094535,0.0015502962,0.00018909614,0.00006698886,0.000030629162,0.00015544423,0.00009514229,0.020377336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964275,0.0015219501,0.00010572213,0.0007921446,0.000664912,0.0004877347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98988193,0.005461511,0.0015615491,0.0013232843,0.0007830314,0.0009886208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023356192,0.00021036454,0.0005031425,0.001277969,0.0014306566,0.004327005,0.0008551935,0.0011492841,0.03481803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023216678,0.00035854618,0.00045881647,0.00097357953,0.0028762615,0.0045828917,0.0020534808,0.0009826968,0.003816058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013498361,0.000028383965,0.012473383,0.00005281217,0.000027114458,0.00008754883,0.0021783516,0.006915364,0.00069284375,0.9475609,0.005596941,0.024251372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075531134,0.000071990566,0.046658922,0.00009985601,0.00004139388,0.00026812532,0.004222605,0.022028914,0.0012868904,0.8229442,0.102248535,0.00005303389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002664841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035053552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03481803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002306955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007447837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11647791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803097171","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12582","title":"INEQUALITY OF SUBJECTIVE WELL‐BEING AS A COMPREHENSIVE MEASURE OF INEQUALITY","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Happiness; Inequality; Index (typography); Economics; Income inequality metrics; Economic inequality; Measure (data warehouse); Scale (ratio); Econometrics; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07624152352977362,"score_gpt":0.37376928704808726,"score_spread":0.29752776351831367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803097171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70160276,0.006012508,0.09525515,0.0076278616,0.0007039568,0.00032033742,0.007961869,0.00016898218,0.18034662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99192035,0.0007375192,0.0036709292,0.00011600548,0.00014153935,0.000097342876,0.0010401129,0.000009499253,0.0022666259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982272,0.0007307612,0.00017292812,0.00017643487,0.00057534187,0.00011741793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939839,0.002506639,0.0016380599,0.0005717369,0.00081387395,0.0004857166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002017127,0.0003345059,0.00040535018,0.0024998125,0.00034190403,0.0015191799,0.00034037483,0.0004746726,0.007454714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011074515,0.00010369668,0.0003142141,0.0046049077,0.0014719596,0.0015511748,0.0016998474,0.0009035282,0.00043818215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021494419,0.00016067561,0.3530174,0.0005179387,0.0005249046,0.0003361634,0.003283242,0.009887374,0.0017100334,0.4808722,0.021988224,0.12748693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001775096,0.00029469986,0.7615415,0.00044623803,0.00009230711,0.0005205083,0.0029738846,0.014570351,0.000448867,0.18320656,0.03578728,0.00010003276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011061233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013814936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007454714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007208978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029549134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024938524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809434191","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12692","title":"LOBBYING FOR MINIMUM WAGES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Ideology; Minimum wage; Politics; Wage; Panel data; Agency (philosophy); Labour economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Econometrics","score_opus":0.10178746334634137,"score_gpt":0.31080238657292336,"score_spread":0.209014923226582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809434191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47380608,0.0010958014,0.10616928,0.0114838015,0.00016186017,0.00030736905,0.00017199323,0.0003152181,0.40648854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98564863,0.00010661772,0.0017730753,0.00034690686,0.000039444683,0.000074373056,0.000020446329,0.0000151980585,0.011975379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543864,0.0015168082,0.00014983314,0.0006867084,0.00079478667,0.0014131642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879391,0.005839559,0.0030798016,0.0012887138,0.00097565516,0.0008770882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004891142,0.00028427635,0.00061142945,0.00095975416,0.0024832378,0.004205162,0.00075697113,0.0025155533,0.012357324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01826341,0.00024553423,0.0004937332,0.00070115336,0.0027433294,0.0018457035,0.0018985114,0.002777909,0.0015334747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017502267,0.00023803875,0.019262517,0.00014937937,0.00005831922,0.0005214728,0.0018189205,0.008111022,0.004387635,0.908626,0.009544465,0.047107164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022366957,0.00024104248,0.03918958,0.0002763492,0.00010082559,0.00043604575,0.003901289,0.046910085,0.007317617,0.8063472,0.09496437,0.00009194916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057506473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075913495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012357324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032463924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004170961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041339397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888111236","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12705","title":"FROM HONEYMOON TO DIVORCE: INSTITUTION QUALITY AND FOREIGN INVESTORS' OWNERSHIP CONSOLIDATION IN CHINA","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Consolidation (business); Odds; China; Business; Honeymoon; Institution; Foreign ownership; Equity (law); Quality (philosophy); Accounting; Foreign direct investment; Economics; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06488170650008365,"score_gpt":0.2779625184493829,"score_spread":0.21308081194929926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888111236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992914,0.00011549144,0.00003852703,0.00013717906,0.0000015371091,0.0000028759378,0.00003223714,0.000001194382,0.00037951648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997423,0.000053683678,0.000009982487,0.0000142492245,0.0000021652295,7.459882e-7,0.00003925421,4.1882876e-7,0.00013720954],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929905,0.00010171576,0.00007030275,0.0001097783,0.00016387836,0.00025525634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916141,0.0005904596,0.005400688,0.00022807586,0.0005746483,0.0015921085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012543466,0.0001532666,0.00024243245,0.0010625032,0.0006283392,0.0015999539,0.00047953788,0.00029105492,0.0021550644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036891778,0.00014936736,0.00030444318,0.0015465667,0.0013065123,0.0009950617,0.0013792771,0.00060632214,0.000104738356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017353948,0.000015524767,0.9972025,0.0000042228444,0.000015745623,0.00007135117,0.00030054833,0.00013240197,0.000045018598,0.00025218358,0.00011637758,0.0018268083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046044,0.000021491778,0.99728656,0.000010532172,0.000013279675,0.000042151478,0.0012695099,0.00079052,0.00009072042,0.0001883577,0.00027685182,0.00000534425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.086036414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11521809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086036414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021874385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016715579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17107123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898873112","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12730","title":"TIME‐USE AND ACADEMIC PEER EFFECTS IN COLLEGE","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Jacobs Foundation; Spencer Foundation; Division of Social and Economic Sciences; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Peer effects; Panel data; Affect (linguistics); Point (geometry); Relevance (law); Academic achievement; Psychology; Focus (optics); Mathematics education; Economics; Social psychology; Political science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.048777630749375564,"score_gpt":0.3382215834343334,"score_spread":0.2894439526849578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898873112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986234,0.00012732792,0.000047858382,0.00007053711,0.000003712703,0.0000025209122,0.00003940434,0.0000036783304,0.0010816696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995453,0.000045242643,0.000010779942,0.0000063217967,0.000007879377,0.0000011822633,0.00003172087,0.0000014788386,0.00035007167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935824,0.00024905722,0.000040588162,0.00007279858,0.00012311812,0.00015625248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98954237,0.0028909617,0.004182611,0.00057554495,0.0004265413,0.0023820156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010815313,0.00016386359,0.0003132289,0.0010095696,0.00054298324,0.0013707569,0.0003409851,0.00033928757,0.005138775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008612623,0.00012237794,0.00021613913,0.0013786205,0.00056178577,0.00067097176,0.0011204776,0.00053312135,0.00048258057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018941381,0.00045058964,0.98510855,0.000011920021,0.000070215036,0.00009566947,0.00063050987,0.00054944097,0.00044606059,0.00077955506,0.00032582867,0.011342205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034208658,0.0000612442,0.99850225,0.0000028419674,0.000009163289,0.000021569916,0.00039364825,0.00041808354,0.00009128283,0.00017940158,0.0003133492,0.0000036619317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005165496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060632695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005165496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005700782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019807086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017190933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901722539","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12739","title":"WHAT DO BICYCLE HELMET LAWS DO? EVIDENCE FROM CANADA","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Injury Epidemiology and Prevention","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Unintended consequences; Population; Injury prevention; Law; Suicide prevention; Human factors and ergonomics; Current Population Survey; Affect (linguistics); Poison control; Cycling; Demographic economics; Psychology; Political science; Demography; Economics; Medicine; Environmental health; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.0594313788062273,"score_gpt":0.3443936804244966,"score_spread":0.2849623016182693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901722539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63991785,0.1852542,0.00084404764,0.056171194,0.00066755555,0.0003609749,0.05331865,0.00008347486,0.06338215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496073,0.037338573,0.00031241952,0.0030177804,0.000121146346,0.000044937056,0.0061760303,0.000020207584,0.0033616398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958968,0.00083850627,0.00036436444,0.0004966713,0.0014463227,0.00095729105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977612,0.006735099,0.005730222,0.00079282187,0.0072775665,0.0018522687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00389913,0.00054445193,0.00094242924,0.0027559928,0.0022487638,0.0024241933,0.0022158825,0.0010253834,0.0068663824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028887656,0.0004938198,0.0014776187,0.0065910425,0.0015766518,0.000817234,0.0014282396,0.0014819603,0.00037114086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008324201,0.00016521552,0.90619284,0.0021606826,0.0021068978,0.0002484402,0.0011870281,0.0012997463,0.00005400967,0.0046243537,0.035980884,0.045147564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023368487,0.00008423148,0.9687019,0.0031934723,0.0020670358,0.000072838026,0.0022376443,0.0010200222,0.00012837056,0.0009013226,0.021312114,0.00004741831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99455005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0281954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0281954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057176273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20457286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917620665","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12762","title":"YOUNG “STARS” IN ECONOMICS: WHAT THEY DO AND WHERE THEY GO","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stars; Economics; Construct (python library); Private sector; Set (abstract data type); Labour economics; Physics; Economic growth; Astronomy","score_opus":0.023019243307850056,"score_gpt":0.21504707287852548,"score_spread":0.19202782957067543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917620665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.978576,0.0014417842,0.0007658302,0.0022298042,0.0000513896,0.00004510083,0.010970792,0.000029581854,0.0058896816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97026247,0.001578542,0.0008780569,0.00072553405,0.00013491354,0.00010192834,0.018971154,0.000030001795,0.0073174313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910057,0.00016346341,0.000085315725,0.00013977275,0.00022451991,0.0002864834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791405,0.003833091,0.010964796,0.00039440583,0.00126936,0.004397861],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015184771,0.00020170376,0.0003454532,0.0028619925,0.00064714934,0.0017674287,0.00049719284,0.00073238055,0.0045588394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009426997,0.00019166617,0.00021656738,0.0037693887,0.0005888798,0.0014861751,0.0014833495,0.0014877574,0.002479841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013735311,0.00014915327,0.9635702,0.00008238063,0.000030773943,0.00010023614,0.0009606687,0.00027167972,0.00014942393,0.0017361894,0.012103304,0.020708682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014332682,0.000054073647,0.9769108,0.00007853651,0.00000946063,0.000079498655,0.0028238453,0.0003437404,0.0001531024,0.00096115033,0.018554792,0.000016672566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015370882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026963633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008986391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000978542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030562818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918090369","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12767","title":"TRADE LIBERALIZATION AND FIRM PRODUCTIVITY: ESTIMATION METHODS MATTER","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Productivity; Quantile regression; Liberalization; Estimation; Production (economics); Econometrics; Free trade; Production function; International trade; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.06668083984773901,"score_gpt":0.27750179214079385,"score_spread":0.21082095229305484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918090369","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13786177,0.01894986,0.8047894,0.015607869,0.00077667594,0.00033558288,0.003291711,0.001147411,0.017239751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85624987,0.008483238,0.12318326,0.0016861112,0.0009133713,0.0003884787,0.0026547092,0.0005197225,0.0059212996],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812959,0.014954043,0.00066098606,0.00117563,0.0016275326,0.00028599374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8311272,0.144748,0.009186184,0.010300771,0.0042620595,0.00037570528],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025251685,0.0007760108,0.0008081514,0.0016638396,0.00044002305,0.0032552397,0.001270014,0.0008992013,0.0064460253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15123868,0.0003350462,0.0007179224,0.0041724625,0.0011093604,0.0029235194,0.0010052238,0.001824988,0.0016284302],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005791791,0.00023081408,0.3648822,0.0016922874,0.0030270864,0.00030256694,0.0013391335,0.02878334,0.0026170507,0.08893317,0.015972978,0.49164027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006977379,0.00041491748,0.3600137,0.0023407373,0.0016163992,0.00093625067,0.0023300834,0.18082976,0.017572826,0.34779683,0.085017994,0.00043274416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052996622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042997003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008924783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010018355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13354528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922419155","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12801","title":"THE COLLAPSE AND RECOVERY OF THE CAPITAL SHARE IN EAST GERMANY AFTER 1989","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"German Economic Analysis & Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Productivity; Capital (architecture); Capital deepening; Wage share; Production (economics); Labour economics; Capital accumulation; Monetary economics; Investment (military); Technical change; Government (linguistics); Capital formation; Wage; Macroeconomics; Market economy; Financial capital; Human capital; Efficiency wage","score_opus":0.015309797345645604,"score_gpt":0.20093620301873172,"score_spread":0.1856264056730861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922419155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854982,0.00051889796,0.0011786,0.0011083228,0.00002192385,0.0000070975543,0.0006704134,0.000028924804,0.010967478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727374,0.00022948613,0.00009204643,0.000047959533,0.000006358834,0.0000030660146,0.00014802135,0.0000054570432,0.0021940363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982184,0.000015422953,0.000008782673,0.000029797779,0.000020860649,0.00010326677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998166,0.000030807278,0.000090178524,0.000014918197,0.000018067589,0.000029355215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032227853,0.00027604416,0.00026754555,0.0005129796,0.000630311,0.0016044665,0.00029505615,0.00060566975,0.002856985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000801768,0.0001696775,0.00030958463,0.00068892015,0.00095215184,0.0013378419,0.0008453675,0.00050014036,0.00043426338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002095417,0.0002383307,0.1517485,0.00037528953,0.00025195218,0.004230536,0.005284208,0.10279064,0.012765696,0.58807516,0.01490728,0.117237024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021608004,0.00040124374,0.7193069,0.0004214666,0.0002545438,0.0009581162,0.0036369218,0.052139495,0.019080747,0.089805655,0.11358795,0.00019090703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0356961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021143772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0356961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028996884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007456789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070976615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943205177","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12798","title":"INFLATION DYNAMICS AND THE OUTPUT‐INFLATION TRADE‐OFF: INTERNATIONAL PANEL DATA EVIDENCE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Blackberry (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Inflation (cosmology); Panel data; Context (archaeology); Econometrics; Estimation; Sample (material); Macroeconomics; New Keynesian economics; Monetary economics; Monetary policy","score_opus":0.18784959740122673,"score_gpt":0.28329006943257,"score_spread":0.09544047203134329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943205177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94032633,0.012541151,0.01169228,0.0024069662,0.00007902219,0.000030046145,0.007948517,0.00010234182,0.024873283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99180543,0.0030340499,0.0007204078,0.00017792087,0.00007591797,0.000008839763,0.0036700366,0.000017807817,0.0004895501],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991805,0.00034253125,0.000080764126,0.00018891205,0.000117392716,0.000089889225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798579,0.009979101,0.007838675,0.0013094856,0.00070500927,0.00030977558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024835025,0.0003098306,0.00051163574,0.00120827,0.00027537992,0.0021784448,0.00046866012,0.0007726965,0.003934637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008442493,0.0002660836,0.000727279,0.00414157,0.00046466835,0.0009323584,0.00092950324,0.0010972646,0.0009465723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057444687,0.0002192912,0.8768125,0.0004175885,0.002228711,0.0005579626,0.0007038045,0.02178097,0.0008198211,0.019612893,0.009005369,0.06726661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054826072,0.00016271717,0.9481947,0.00033549443,0.001206096,0.00034195522,0.00076881144,0.01982658,0.001323566,0.015858417,0.0118333725,0.00009347484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039309966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029654668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003934637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030588856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014963509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013162732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946525269","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12841","title":"THE SHIFTS IN LEAD‐LAG PROPERTIES OF THE U.S. BUSINESS CYCLE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Business cycle; Lagging; Economics; Lag; Counterfactual thinking; Productivity; Unemployment; Econometrics; Unemployment rate; Lead (geology); Okun's law; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07242821459084246,"score_gpt":0.21600050301260515,"score_spread":0.14357228842176267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946525269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94909465,0.0050285994,0.006412605,0.005181858,0.00024602123,0.00002267257,0.0034341223,0.00019641234,0.030383037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945951,0.002190721,0.0008051798,0.0002387507,0.000049678147,0.0000046977907,0.000922265,0.00002347639,0.0011701598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989164,0.000018710767,0.000009864151,0.000033689306,0.000025876841,0.000020194499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989587,0.00027253065,0.00028277017,0.00008287606,0.00029556698,0.000107453016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005323965,0.00016813414,0.0001572144,0.0012195876,0.00034129797,0.0013237535,0.000114344264,0.00025933795,0.002483231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038883237,0.00012612808,0.00017911999,0.002219413,0.00039183832,0.0006293413,0.00035307521,0.00064577477,0.00054974505],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046042164,0.00010477368,0.6252131,0.00022883542,0.0001355054,0.00043001966,0.002217584,0.019517012,0.0059148725,0.06621011,0.03674493,0.24282284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025322766,0.00013282309,0.8831093,0.00022793162,0.00007108234,0.00036667442,0.0009179356,0.027270501,0.0034627442,0.035930447,0.04842117,0.00006417107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01558072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024755305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01558072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077528314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005804623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03098005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955915050","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12821","title":"THE “SALES AGENT” PROBLEM: EFFORT/LEISURE ALLOCATION UNDER PERFORMANCE PAY AS BEHAVIOR TOWARDS RISK","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Incentive; Intuition; Economics; Microeconomics; Risk aversion (psychology); Expected utility hypothesis; Actuarial science; Business; Financial economics","score_opus":0.03393137693832947,"score_gpt":0.2403013965238475,"score_spread":0.20637001958551804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955915050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64112586,0.0007385916,0.28685904,0.010721503,0.00014859355,0.00032188886,0.0006098532,0.00018633612,0.059288293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695686,0.00037963197,0.014680998,0.00024050042,0.000112078946,0.00017597784,0.00011581527,0.00003821587,0.014687952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831355,0.0010164196,0.000056328965,0.00028897403,0.00013166682,0.00019320077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941924,0.0037701004,0.0009553848,0.00030385685,0.0001906443,0.00058756303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004136075,0.00074020826,0.0013641936,0.0006159082,0.0009849529,0.003263034,0.0016311023,0.0039197784,0.0124663375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014117993,0.00065976393,0.0008171495,0.0006490237,0.0036807936,0.0048595658,0.001865561,0.0024107378,0.0007164273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051530515,0.0003866824,0.005957558,0.00016328131,0.000109057226,0.00046760624,0.00054045586,0.14122967,0.0017087997,0.8257281,0.003134098,0.020059464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026787215,0.00014937668,0.003955688,0.000057244484,0.000048856054,0.0001645439,0.00041481492,0.37104124,0.00047596835,0.620457,0.0029209962,0.0000463237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002589165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015835004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124663375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021857657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014124028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04170406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969143167","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12829","title":"THE U.S. LABOR INCOME SHARE AND AUTOMATION SHOCKS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"University of California, Irvine","keywords":"Economics; Indexation; Wage share; Investment (military); Wage; Monetary economics; Labour economics; Monetary policy; Macroeconomics; Econometrics; Efficiency wage","score_opus":0.02110859803657688,"score_gpt":0.23866756777774306,"score_spread":0.21755896974116617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969143167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98181194,0.00041676115,0.0005648632,0.0022764227,0.00004387769,0.000010737914,0.004011471,0.000055624085,0.010808307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693704,0.00026594164,0.000065416636,0.00008175575,0.000033114284,0.0000041820613,0.0013969797,0.000006487312,0.0012090688],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998944,0.00001574448,0.0000072310618,0.000023569828,0.000028701483,0.00003031949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994723,0.0000945399,0.00029939204,0.000025533356,0.000051647712,0.000056596713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000263219,0.00018231219,0.00013263634,0.00066275994,0.00029276207,0.0009272317,0.00014194039,0.000321416,0.0037505538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013121826,0.00011114787,0.00017360685,0.001515805,0.0003695773,0.0004438125,0.0004409653,0.0004327971,0.0005923474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029168444,0.0000925647,0.86700964,0.00007664893,0.000084842715,0.00038717844,0.0011230947,0.02432509,0.0013296541,0.031501245,0.0280422,0.045736145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010312037,0.000056422137,0.96385396,0.000045119028,0.00001674933,0.00008114597,0.00094701437,0.014594447,0.00047738868,0.007447541,0.012451374,0.000018544699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023627521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021962231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023627521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009755679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037500542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046979964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970385006","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12836","title":"COMMODITY PRICES AND BANK LENDING","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Department for International Development","keywords":"Economics; Commodity; Monetary economics; Loan; Asset (computer security); Shock (circulatory); Asset quality; Sample (material); Price shock; Consumption (sociology); Commodity swap; Macroeconomics; Finance; Microeconomics; Capital adequacy ratio","score_opus":0.03757708055982513,"score_gpt":0.2482740313250451,"score_spread":0.21069695076522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970385006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957457,0.0004573511,0.00061854697,0.00037507148,0.000006972334,0.000010153184,0.0005661996,0.000009150375,0.0022107756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856746,0.00033889918,0.0001415012,0.000024078832,0.000014866829,0.000007612157,0.00025014122,0.0000030028052,0.00065249193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995541,0.000160181,0.000035489666,0.00007796837,0.00008663132,0.000085589614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98747313,0.0048297313,0.0064822836,0.0003538999,0.00036297215,0.0004980117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075525336,0.00016154796,0.0002910602,0.0012769556,0.0004656678,0.0014916586,0.00031076305,0.0005289186,0.005431398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01005271,0.00023024138,0.00026008848,0.0037224088,0.0009620787,0.0007410972,0.0007647601,0.0010396132,0.0005997696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001644989,0.00012701844,0.973034,0.000047561196,0.00013682853,0.00030729247,0.0007316796,0.003922005,0.0002450531,0.005238218,0.0010357372,0.015010149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026261585,0.00008481209,0.98458105,0.00002806189,0.000060498,0.00021870478,0.0009463643,0.0051698624,0.0002523307,0.006329565,0.0022853515,0.000017172746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005961283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003887627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005961283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007508769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046191594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01816976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971891405","doi":"10.1111/ecin.70029","title":"Consumer confidence and household investment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Consumer confidence index; Investment (military); Stylized fact; Shock (circulatory); Economics; Consumption (sociology); Business cycle; Productivity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Confidence interval; Demand shock; Monetary economics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.052709941014048085,"score_gpt":0.2426783929211424,"score_spread":0.18996845190709433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971891405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862179,0.0006576274,0.0010460007,0.0013598823,0.000027051992,0.000016459047,0.0010622668,0.000020054102,0.00959275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991634,0.000074322204,0.000051122133,0.000039800405,0.0000148152185,0.000002348196,0.0002032514,0.0000010924073,0.00044993038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996301,0.00009741778,0.000033962075,0.00005119105,0.000091950686,0.00009526444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843999,0.0064394153,0.006419842,0.0005121233,0.0009637201,0.0012650253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008976801,0.00016091733,0.00019280426,0.00069111394,0.00017736592,0.0011871103,0.00019900317,0.0005447247,0.008047956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010324644,0.00011389844,0.00021778536,0.0010153247,0.0003833276,0.0005835924,0.00045687953,0.00088392897,0.00045196828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093783616,0.000088444605,0.98344225,0.000021357777,0.000076455755,0.00009381627,0.00015539471,0.0019079363,0.00012582194,0.003293443,0.001195374,0.009506117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008089801,0.000076673416,0.98750603,0.000027443526,0.000025331321,0.00009016236,0.00045032945,0.00549164,0.0001708623,0.0043290607,0.001809434,0.000015048498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050955447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003996389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008047956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005803486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020004073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02692312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973194375","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12843","title":"SOCIAL CHANGES IN IMPRESSIONABLE YEARS AND ADULT POLITICAL ATTITUDES: EVIDENCE FROM JEWISH EXPULSIONS IN NAZI GERMANY","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Socioeconomic status; Demographic economics; Judaism; World War II; Demography; Church attendance; Urbanization; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth; Geography; Population; Law; Religiosity","score_opus":0.07441830592400993,"score_gpt":0.38627655688101187,"score_spread":0.3118582509570019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973194375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99964416,0.00004777973,0.0000068525646,0.000022932223,0.0000011869672,0.0000010790466,0.000046599616,4.2675066e-7,0.00022891746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996184,0.00004551671,0.000008818719,0.000013154873,0.00000286327,0.0000012958455,0.00008691296,4.935908e-7,0.00022259736],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954057,0.0001261831,0.00003093126,0.000058660287,0.00007988998,0.00016378856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975222,0.00039158223,0.0011782591,0.00018584836,0.0002770506,0.00044496986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009663868,0.00021290603,0.00029337395,0.0012173946,0.00096660276,0.0008926104,0.00039560444,0.00043219025,0.002771883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028935557,0.00024936255,0.00030166685,0.0013371615,0.00096876343,0.0004211345,0.0008991962,0.00056364445,0.0004661104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015561537,0.00008662722,0.99249107,0.000008792608,0.000042814554,0.00009316292,0.0034918075,0.00002050456,0.00026470234,0.000089659974,0.00014292073,0.0031123846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018105025,0.000023833074,0.9988531,0.0000023048676,0.000004767446,0.000018551518,0.00093418086,0.000015640206,0.000020450741,0.0000068987392,0.000117051015,0.0000014963143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08029506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.122321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08029506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069595437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037211142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15965539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973271993","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12919","title":"DESPERATE TIMES CALL FOR DESPERATE MEASURES: GOVERNMENT SPENDING MULTIPLIERS IN HARD TIMES","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Seoul National University","keywords":"Economics; Government spending; Fiscal policy; Unemployment; Government (linguistics); Estimation; Point (geometry); State (computer science); Sample (material); Econometrics; Unemployment rate; Macroeconomics; Welfare; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17213820555345527,"score_gpt":0.2619547261184776,"score_spread":0.08981652056502232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973271993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782485,0.0012295009,0.0053501595,0.006118707,0.00014856778,0.0000174402,0.0012406207,0.000033670098,0.0076128133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967534,0.00026307598,0.00061387866,0.00018809245,0.00012440121,0.000013596749,0.0005243859,0.000018152674,0.001500996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997155,0.00012163024,0.000020310294,0.000048557653,0.000041146763,0.00005289757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920832,0.0030136004,0.0036614283,0.00023722582,0.0003839908,0.0006205861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017784399,0.00032574718,0.00032531456,0.0012628441,0.00038987564,0.0018458386,0.0003321901,0.00043682798,0.0066163456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013455343,0.00016879916,0.0002702322,0.0017836001,0.0005510416,0.001719062,0.0011409579,0.0014405107,0.00045805456],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001245128,0.00027099074,0.7161789,0.00024573973,0.0004394166,0.0004121603,0.001715336,0.035312995,0.0012926458,0.12916888,0.019863963,0.09385374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013823489,0.0004254127,0.7704843,0.00029822352,0.00021026666,0.000173393,0.0038126477,0.07710923,0.0019881492,0.11863744,0.026616858,0.00010576945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048535834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055538635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066163456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007002662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005404372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022133887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984584893","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12917","title":"AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF KIN AND ETHNIC FAVORITISM","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Kinship; Ethnic group; Sibling; Social psychology; Language change; Nepotism; Interpersonal ties; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Law; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.14269747553172976,"score_gpt":0.38108888768286336,"score_spread":0.2383914121511336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984584893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99160695,0.000057732115,0.00042455332,0.00023670595,0.00003719717,0.000058530248,0.00005200796,0.0000067252126,0.0075194477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958181,0.00007289416,0.0009808309,0.00020351158,0.000018776771,0.00016163658,0.000038145416,0.000004734196,0.0027013808],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858874,0.00085592427,0.0000678344,0.00021780748,0.0001636752,0.000105974985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98701316,0.00770535,0.0024111273,0.0017225019,0.00026742963,0.0008804507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024512736,0.00038780557,0.00030942707,0.00034667557,0.0008063163,0.0011228807,0.0006107101,0.0008725052,0.0113548925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008128468,0.0002173404,0.00021614924,0.0002838287,0.0017980816,0.00068571547,0.0008614361,0.0010962647,0.0005680174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028023388,0.21139891,0.18598877,0.0014638557,0.00082730176,0.001542266,0.01719633,0.004082808,0.30372426,0.11198975,0.009175522,0.12458683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011857853,0.13315709,0.52399963,0.0005003604,0.00090589264,0.0019834882,0.02294557,0.032613583,0.112728335,0.11030234,0.048606183,0.00039967167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005615371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007845221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113548925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005234341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003611038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03798592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989385916","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12860","title":"CITATIONS AND INCENTIVES IN ACADEMIC CONTESTS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Incentive; Index (typography); Economics; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Microeconomics; Rent-seeking; Mathematical economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.6736258481036862,"score_gpt":0.6097729619107982,"score_spread":0.06385288619288798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989385916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7237532,0.0029912484,0.020187987,0.012122536,0.00024598278,0.00020838017,0.00023879239,0.00007793016,0.24017389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958835,0.00027262478,0.000800082,0.00018705928,0.00009492142,0.00004777471,0.000017648228,0.0000071429154,0.0026891413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878106,0.0077206483,0.00044517376,0.0006327744,0.0012038517,0.0021870006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9049261,0.06502208,0.015228482,0.0024623608,0.0037203243,0.008640696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01792577,0.00051928975,0.0012948372,0.002869593,0.0036238972,0.00974401,0.001122639,0.0037015085,0.017148163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06433126,0.0003783483,0.00069931283,0.0031275707,0.006793223,0.0058036903,0.0052904473,0.0020661347,0.0009768988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004959679,0.0001839792,0.009266127,0.00014917032,0.000039747403,0.0001776859,0.0008688929,0.011227711,0.0005000348,0.96034074,0.002528191,0.0142217465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033670414,0.00014835052,0.008003262,0.00008791145,0.000033973338,0.00009499658,0.0015765183,0.0266309,0.00027665586,0.9543938,0.008365558,0.000051351657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001692977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018524624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00565645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034008487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094801664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990487729","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12865","title":"THE GREAT OVERESTIMATION: TAX DATA AND INEQUALITY MEASUREMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1913–1943","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic inequality; Economics; State income tax; Income inequality metrics; Income distribution; Inequality; Income tax; Revenue; Enforcement; Distribution (mathematics); Demographic economics; Public economics; Tax reform; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.19100274355651106,"score_gpt":0.37283974949710047,"score_spread":0.1818370059405894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990487729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97649914,0.0018717605,0.0008335024,0.0034751366,0.00006434904,0.000012147135,0.0046040844,0.000013169115,0.012626589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565953,0.0008148732,0.00027502258,0.00029759758,0.00006565861,0.000011159403,0.0022732215,0.000005084047,0.0005978265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988882,0.000380445,0.00011131452,0.000120995086,0.00036796747,0.00013104416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928275,0.002121019,0.0026829087,0.00071668753,0.0014596351,0.00019230001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002369015,0.0001162716,0.00015761366,0.002005551,0.0009968755,0.0010117746,0.00033966865,0.00027084636,0.0014086713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010243283,0.00010258119,0.000118462194,0.006071635,0.00082946906,0.000873642,0.0013692994,0.0010247632,0.00017999229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070409624,0.000030943334,0.9465892,0.000033950306,0.00005685601,0.00008515455,0.0024680172,0.00071077875,0.00016516002,0.007254262,0.010587675,0.031947754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013401958,0.00001252168,0.98787737,0.00004192032,0.00001281156,0.00006516971,0.0018744809,0.00065738655,0.00037478088,0.0009330747,0.008139696,0.000009343418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07646382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09270688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07646382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016720662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056392414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1520375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999940497","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12877","title":"LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA AND ITS EFFECTS: AN INTRODUCTION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Curry; Library science; Sentence; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04940385601364612,"score_gpt":0.23542576397583748,"score_spread":0.18602190796219137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999940497","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036627608,0.89314824,0.008249013,0.040636685,0.0050644577,0.0000996735,0.0012330029,0.00004617847,0.047860034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02812734,0.9008387,0.008264707,0.014187352,0.019073168,0.00023408952,0.0005876121,0.00006252936,0.028624503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993655,0.00016469945,0.00009520382,0.00012193951,0.00016411353,0.00008850914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782515,0.0014847618,0.00025110305,0.00006683522,0.00027950766,0.0000926807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009722483,0.0014759038,0.0012956946,0.0051057176,0.0017717943,0.0049030297,0.0011016845,0.0045029903,0.010253846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002260299,0.0010026548,0.0017080024,0.0051054414,0.0032685893,0.007041426,0.0021953,0.004635481,0.0018195396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010154477,0.00079480704,0.0043382994,0.00402731,0.00010515051,0.00068991986,0.00077941915,0.0036153803,0.0011389549,0.6698158,0.11839559,0.19619784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014860659,0.0001739734,0.008549278,0.0036763265,0.000069930014,0.0005656512,0.00057561963,0.0011145894,0.0003871128,0.18268748,0.8021005,0.00008474995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02429484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030789448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02429484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042775646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044113216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048306882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010595928","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12882","title":"RECIPROCITY UNDER BRIEF AND LONG‐TIME DELAYS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Tilburg; Universiteit Maastricht; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; University of Arizona","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Wage; Economics; Labour economics; Efficiency wage; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0818494165616713,"score_gpt":0.33622500996225585,"score_spread":0.2543755934005846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010595928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99501663,0.00016271159,0.0012027334,0.0001385482,0.000020772432,0.000044382912,0.00007495616,0.000010823273,0.0033284884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817336,0.00009744351,0.00074084225,0.000045961195,0.000019348845,0.00009468628,0.00003621386,0.0000067556875,0.00078535464],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974956,0.001328515,0.0001898844,0.00042092273,0.00034105117,0.00022400879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94083613,0.04306783,0.0077374224,0.0060673812,0.00066765636,0.0016235466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053510396,0.00032956843,0.0005359202,0.00029766402,0.00034901293,0.0008493621,0.0005291848,0.0008832806,0.005609212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037274208,0.00026475178,0.00025192671,0.00025778168,0.0012410294,0.0011756512,0.0012120525,0.0009066132,0.00046571952],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07648859,0.024255926,0.12894177,0.0041868216,0.0013513285,0.0012677219,0.010775887,0.042575814,0.367027,0.09998886,0.0037752846,0.23936504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010857469,0.06539235,0.5456957,0.0007174781,0.0014738174,0.0016879522,0.0062218197,0.065787576,0.09583175,0.18271786,0.023075003,0.00054117927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063473586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047496564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005609212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048584843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040206034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028299332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032238315","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13088","title":"The effect of priming on fraud: Evidence from a natural field experiment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Technology Assessment international; Universität Innsbruck; Austrian Science Fund; University of Exeter","keywords":"Honesty; Priming (agriculture); Natural experiment; Dishonesty; Credence; Prime (order theory); Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Statistics; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04979675101211685,"score_gpt":0.37030605905441016,"score_spread":0.32050930804229333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032238315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879291,0.0002223758,0.002833335,0.0004958647,0.00008290849,0.00032674382,0.00011173816,0.000055319364,0.007942506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938791,0.00017908546,0.003943382,0.0005950247,0.00006897988,0.00032491368,0.00008016495,0.000025111847,0.00090424775],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413896,0.0041975426,0.00024784062,0.0006493668,0.0005891311,0.00017719803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8923413,0.08082636,0.014733006,0.008933741,0.0013757878,0.0017898162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069944467,0.00060046226,0.00072471006,0.00029796443,0.00068111334,0.00088006107,0.0006680141,0.0016345693,0.005803517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03938109,0.00053863955,0.00033037786,0.00022372289,0.0016551174,0.0011171065,0.00076847384,0.0014720045,0.0006087121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.099343196,0.09515889,0.160329,0.00326486,0.0011434829,0.0016923969,0.00564431,0.0059988727,0.44251144,0.038211167,0.009640442,0.13706194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0113277715,0.110768706,0.6569478,0.00050248276,0.0012635307,0.0027998602,0.0012083699,0.022746485,0.12996413,0.04274188,0.019313904,0.00041512572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071845896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044220037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069944467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005080352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046959697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036990583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033348593","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13075","title":"In December days are shorter but loans are cheaper","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Strasbourg","keywords":"Loan; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Actuarial science; Fixed interest rate loan; Non-conforming loan; Monetary economics; Econometrics; Business; Non-performing loan; Finance","score_opus":0.0381042734221612,"score_gpt":0.24689328895769555,"score_spread":0.20878901553553436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033348593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937111,0.00022230776,0.0005539758,0.00050506165,0.00003567687,0.000012318171,0.001328858,0.00006235885,0.0035683115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950696,0.00013980073,0.00016613498,0.00010573707,0.00008688408,0.000009188027,0.00093374634,0.000019942368,0.0034689114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991001,0.00021339065,0.00008465515,0.00015858345,0.00025516778,0.0001881622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97886306,0.005921751,0.011862663,0.00066154235,0.001136845,0.0015541281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010672259,0.00012002518,0.00038625117,0.00050303625,0.00048190157,0.0017060085,0.00031425487,0.0003744219,0.011121829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008304941,0.00016114781,0.0003449471,0.0008719712,0.0003135471,0.0005469024,0.00053279096,0.0009753602,0.0022883085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039046214,0.00018250415,0.97902894,0.000035150777,0.000094314484,0.00014048624,0.00024466697,0.0006725632,0.0015966665,0.00091770344,0.0040447144,0.012651975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008299829,0.000088954825,0.9948143,0.000005880488,0.000026163843,0.00007872118,0.00019950727,0.0005996934,0.00049362704,0.00027187017,0.0034075438,0.0000054556476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006650894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008151547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011121829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003421644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032577265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037206233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080963047","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12943","title":"FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE SERVICES TRADE: DOES EXCHANGE RATE OR INCOME MATTER?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Financial services; Exchange rate; Economics; Competition (biology); Business; Product (mathematics); Service (business); International economics; Finance; Economy","score_opus":0.031475799488633535,"score_gpt":0.22629623726096765,"score_spread":0.1948204377723341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080963047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.965371,0.005346781,0.0007845165,0.0054066735,0.00018080225,0.000030590418,0.001380285,0.000023547631,0.021475729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99428,0.0016024054,0.000086744294,0.0003414525,0.00019705018,0.0000054843895,0.00078691443,0.000013812893,0.0026861639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940395,0.00019600395,0.000058507572,0.000102720616,0.00010061093,0.00013824363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99281913,0.0025536064,0.0035353627,0.00019663402,0.00028304366,0.00061214383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012076768,0.0002884964,0.0005511564,0.00096215936,0.00038387816,0.0027623773,0.0003543735,0.0007028556,0.011899241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004601213,0.000111101035,0.00075599976,0.0016841728,0.00084738206,0.0018340582,0.00063548185,0.001138521,0.0014127297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057936134,0.00015628466,0.9672062,0.0001155948,0.00038648708,0.0006309294,0.00033532528,0.001116332,0.00044729077,0.006065937,0.002718523,0.020241825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031195545,0.00020444524,0.98507625,0.000119027674,0.00035297018,0.00019928691,0.0015831756,0.002051643,0.00039511715,0.0032946581,0.0066661877,0.000026081561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003858841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027751853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011899241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038816174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036455967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039806902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121613258","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00452.x","title":"THREAT AND PUNISHMENT IN PUBLIC GOOD EXPERIMENTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Public good; Earnings; Welfare; Economics; Social dilemma; Public economics; Institution; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Market economy; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.13171269925703155,"score_gpt":0.3810343282951341,"score_spread":0.24932162903810257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121613258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93417746,0.0006003511,0.029263409,0.0028446354,0.0002051216,0.0006782251,0.00025607971,0.00012946682,0.031845294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871454,0.0002064085,0.009435333,0.00051203487,0.000058253845,0.00068396627,0.000048809758,0.000018705081,0.0018910596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839071,0.012971351,0.00049940473,0.00075136375,0.0014007221,0.0004700493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8984562,0.080634035,0.011710497,0.006190541,0.0009909136,0.002017854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017011102,0.0011119102,0.0010188153,0.00097175484,0.0010849362,0.0026952736,0.0011495118,0.002858223,0.0064079603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05413142,0.0005746191,0.0004417247,0.0007850242,0.005037186,0.0029859317,0.0019529345,0.0024711345,0.00041341974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028047215,0.026130194,0.027991068,0.0023728963,0.0008729744,0.0012134061,0.0053453245,0.079295665,0.059641402,0.69047236,0.006421097,0.07219641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010881897,0.022636563,0.020464594,0.00035384204,0.00031846802,0.0005891257,0.0013372949,0.110380635,0.016641835,0.7978089,0.018300137,0.00028686362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038024722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003242556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017011102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016587623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095938036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08996439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121693044","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00398.x","title":"CAN'T BUY ME LOVE? A FIELD EXPERIMENT EXPLORING THE TRADE‐OFF BETWEEN INCOME AND CASTE‐STATUS IN AN INDIAN MATRIMONIAL MARKET","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Caste; Newspaper; Incentive; Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.138450943437984,"score_gpt":0.3606077824274311,"score_spread":0.22215683898944708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121693044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99646205,0.000011969926,0.00012820435,0.00020509031,0.000025806119,0.00015894875,0.000065184555,0.0000062397285,0.002936594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920012,0.000039887214,0.00088887376,0.0005320867,0.000051636252,0.0003366901,0.00008353263,0.0000064133933,0.006059642],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991498,0.00044561172,0.00003440632,0.00013175952,0.00010742008,0.0001309163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245787,0.0044761994,0.0011547584,0.0006659132,0.00020264447,0.0010427186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030468411,0.0005003716,0.00053156365,0.0004024833,0.0023508698,0.0016807121,0.0010372971,0.0015111032,0.014518145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003913606,0.00041686033,0.00035820145,0.0003345837,0.0017999439,0.0010550965,0.0008411065,0.0019873902,0.0011917822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.088333584,0.5144652,0.1427109,0.00097541494,0.00032710453,0.0027272508,0.022612909,0.0018323048,0.11393242,0.024180718,0.014228015,0.073674396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020616336,0.29547355,0.5315214,0.00021175317,0.00062739017,0.0007395375,0.05355892,0.02768756,0.024453804,0.0197951,0.024841104,0.0004734647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021172764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004110843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014518145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005387697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006529385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04856801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122143160","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00221.x","title":"A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE NATIVITY WEALTH GAP<sup>*</sup>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Economics; Demographic economics; Educational attainment; Position (finance); Labour economics; Geography; Economic growth","score_opus":0.055725331496953766,"score_gpt":0.28963879144103727,"score_spread":0.2339134599440835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122143160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912049,0.0005115006,0.00021294075,0.00028178687,0.000006686973,0.0000054800657,0.00043029248,0.0000019627162,0.0073442636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998014,0.00024129752,0.00009212926,0.000021303338,0.0000065624627,0.0000056681965,0.00039959856,0.0000013812971,0.0012181537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986565,0.00004795028,0.0000065540107,0.000012573041,0.00002731601,0.000039962342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990157,0.00042702456,0.00027218877,0.000043872355,0.00012985592,0.00011129093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005198995,0.00006904206,0.00014877405,0.0010209437,0.00041791773,0.0006981901,0.00018634353,0.00015970986,0.0052534016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021740175,0.00005517166,0.00015152113,0.0014103827,0.0003214911,0.00052244985,0.00093120517,0.00028927642,0.00030002338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050544617,0.0001554321,0.86101115,0.00012623386,0.00017409727,0.0011539195,0.0045925183,0.003285971,0.00076967257,0.06401144,0.0065943236,0.057619788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062641234,0.00006613725,0.9847697,0.000045643428,0.000033809578,0.00017642621,0.0040273443,0.0028306872,0.00019708589,0.0027365575,0.0051042056,0.000006227574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013045326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023989422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013045326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004882323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002581922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02593875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122742508","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12065","title":"ACCOUNTING FOR THE CYCLICAL DYNAMICS OF INCOME SHARES","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Replicate; Business cycle; Volatility (finance); Factor shares; Econometrics; Aggregate (composite); Wage share; Monetary economics; Competition (biology); Income shares; Macroeconomics; Production (economics); Income distribution; Unemployment","score_opus":0.036453999470681155,"score_gpt":0.2473403530043366,"score_spread":0.21088635353365545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122742508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52900463,0.001270455,0.38505074,0.00519286,0.00043347495,0.00018602367,0.0042519686,0.0010494257,0.07356043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838844,0.0006345891,0.0076924483,0.00009946183,0.00009993076,0.00004277482,0.000760582,0.00007191101,0.006713914],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960476,0.00007382525,0.00002807317,0.00012247388,0.00010750108,0.00006338917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974088,0.0007977682,0.00083124876,0.0006278572,0.00020896205,0.00012541245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007927343,0.00045431807,0.0003566281,0.00080492574,0.00048873055,0.0022614163,0.0011080988,0.0009355859,0.0053270613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009089923,0.0003487181,0.00073972164,0.0015590213,0.0006412422,0.0023204584,0.00074522285,0.0010578664,0.00077564566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052988566,0.000083840845,0.09381795,0.00006910346,0.00013604377,0.00048591595,0.00031191856,0.47565877,0.0013640203,0.37574077,0.008183708,0.044094987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016791888,0.000027778822,0.018189609,0.000035780256,0.000057290654,0.0001702331,0.00014274602,0.8138562,0.00067527714,0.15426937,0.012525154,0.000033793847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019806806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0124200415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019806806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014969612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023186365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039383054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123436593","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12077","title":"LABOR CONTRACTS AND FLEXIBILITY: EVIDENCE FROM A LABOR MARKET REFORM IN SPAIN","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Counterfactual thinking; Labour economics; Economics; Productivity; Labor demand; Flexibility (engineering); Panel data; Value (mathematics); Wage; Econometrics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.059769905460861875,"score_gpt":0.28128320490070013,"score_spread":0.22151329943983827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123436593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957722,0.0006730107,0.00014054612,0.0007809611,0.000014043218,0.000011365031,0.0003136449,0.000008042683,0.002286231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852043,0.00025556752,0.00004920472,0.00010783489,0.000030194697,0.0000068668696,0.0003912481,0.0000032978753,0.00063537975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984748,0.00053054205,0.00009320023,0.00020198595,0.0002936396,0.00040583854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98810726,0.0038680772,0.0054756384,0.00097313075,0.00081021024,0.0007657285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027044704,0.00022952269,0.0006712836,0.0008080621,0.0006006569,0.0015482074,0.0009551693,0.0014096461,0.0030430616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086928215,0.00016551037,0.0004279626,0.0017721528,0.0014436521,0.0006384854,0.0013390821,0.0011110911,0.00038223306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004036274,0.002579558,0.88900983,0.00030394574,0.00033653868,0.00091937947,0.003515932,0.017498175,0.001644999,0.007137282,0.0054666973,0.06755144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003238553,0.0005141367,0.9843056,0.000076770004,0.0000616769,0.000059371036,0.0027744554,0.0030262223,0.0004115705,0.0017123842,0.006706327,0.000027566262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04296204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029456137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04296204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024375962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001165541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08542395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124162369","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00403.x","title":"DOUBLE MAJORS: ONE FOR ME, ONE FOR THE PARENTS?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coursework; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Field (mathematics); Sample (material); Graduation (instrument); Mathematics education; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15510585630722834,"score_gpt":0.3210667590808268,"score_spread":0.16596090277359848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124162369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8459107,0.0038795334,0.0021882236,0.1130396,0.0010912983,0.00003078863,0.0018653815,0.000084977226,0.031909548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96615654,0.0022347579,0.0003961588,0.005010055,0.00033188562,0.00001752548,0.00054815365,0.000016163549,0.025288748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968207,0.00012656726,0.000010031519,0.00004923951,0.000058108413,0.000073956246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836,0.00036929295,0.00051045354,0.000058745703,0.000121860045,0.0005796337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005923412,0.00014007816,0.00019915805,0.00029120067,0.0007313381,0.0018562839,0.0002644783,0.0010740868,0.02626949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034614822,0.00012252717,0.00012697157,0.00060391164,0.00066502346,0.0013226211,0.00064471003,0.0010207648,0.0035556331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017650989,0.00022414738,0.49493024,0.00015495186,0.000032405205,0.0013384982,0.0040842863,0.00043066023,0.00065372133,0.04319763,0.26878276,0.18599421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010096047,0.0004080905,0.48663116,0.0004081528,0.000053247702,0.003895689,0.07537939,0.003718945,0.0005859077,0.04640593,0.38233617,0.00007642388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059505696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008154227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02626949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000492447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057095557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087880194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124683167","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00252.x","title":"PATENT POOL FORMATION AND SCOPE OF PATENTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Scope (computer science); Wonder; Industrial organization; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.16886386602509382,"score_gpt":0.2298159493344077,"score_spread":0.06095208330931387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124683167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8500164,0.006654652,0.03600818,0.0042215,0.000048542566,0.00028261013,0.00069067715,0.00011109883,0.10196627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946932,0.00081946194,0.0011379307,0.000099369936,0.000071929026,0.00006784666,0.000107754415,0.000008729385,0.0029937578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951389,0.0015262344,0.00043658388,0.0010708257,0.0009843749,0.00084311515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89789283,0.062799305,0.029341782,0.0032875843,0.0028250187,0.0038534484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010314022,0.00031103456,0.0010102686,0.0040645325,0.0020914953,0.005736156,0.0009997764,0.0020102207,0.01754688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059748575,0.00040225164,0.00063190825,0.0031066742,0.0038531553,0.007203466,0.0046493094,0.001188048,0.001464133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006578162,0.0002592517,0.16512522,0.0007399914,0.00029090804,0.0019692327,0.004189481,0.018946309,0.0094299875,0.6568287,0.007103589,0.1344596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002490153,0.00060766016,0.17539874,0.00055613276,0.00034094608,0.0029188613,0.0050456105,0.02197307,0.0071321777,0.7450575,0.04060063,0.00011958602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007243659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063549826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01754688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017260204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014425835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058700204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126006931","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00358.x","title":"DOMESTIC OR U.S. NEWS: WHAT DRIVES CANADIAN FINANCIAL MARKETS?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Economics; Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Exchange rate; Volatility (finance); Stock (firearms); Monetary economics; Financial market; Financial economics; Central bank; Stock market; Interest rate; Monetary policy; Econometrics; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.05479791294782944,"score_gpt":0.24977350642872417,"score_spread":0.19497559348089474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126006931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8693339,0.0069891675,0.00054883305,0.021629,0.00027168612,0.00006942052,0.0065461495,0.0000909703,0.09452079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935143,0.0019347457,0.00014353188,0.00048686514,0.00007973295,0.0000041759827,0.0008672711,0.000018082264,0.0029513394],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918836,0.00005855389,0.000023005863,0.000100550285,0.00039749566,0.00023206355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919789,0.0018456213,0.002189932,0.00019599433,0.0028474873,0.0009419708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010906652,0.0003432828,0.0004507384,0.0023264075,0.0023383573,0.0064295554,0.0006177739,0.0008907796,0.0056740334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015431564,0.0002023481,0.00026501695,0.00521793,0.0012550767,0.0014478907,0.0006835535,0.001054023,0.00049074134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007984443,0.00013095295,0.75726557,0.0004464561,0.000258309,0.0010500117,0.007910726,0.0060557122,0.0022930615,0.035478644,0.078289725,0.1100224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046783956,0.000047123605,0.9229594,0.00021718365,0.00021112889,0.00019763634,0.011661931,0.0085967425,0.0011241736,0.0032191703,0.051574737,0.00014394938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97303843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027497591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027497591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019982183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19950992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135449671","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12993","title":"Seller reputation and price gouging: Evidence from the <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Reputation; Amazon rainforest; Economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Microeconomics; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.27087718799587945,"score_gpt":0.4137878163226759,"score_spread":0.14291062832679646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135449671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725878,0.0012184111,0.0005673668,0.003244407,0.0000550189,0.000048169128,0.0010951862,0.000019735247,0.021163708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976367,0.00029995915,0.00007275583,0.00032703474,0.000038687416,0.000009693565,0.00029248712,0.0000073386586,0.0013154964],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989349,0.0004583659,0.00007028102,0.00014937407,0.00023379043,0.00015337206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95389694,0.01703931,0.022447307,0.0021649585,0.0020793981,0.002371997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003369907,0.00014105797,0.0003007944,0.0006897706,0.0008660053,0.0013278263,0.00072789815,0.0011058594,0.010979013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022061354,0.00022937,0.00030824108,0.0007721956,0.0012932627,0.0019653994,0.0010116945,0.0017100875,0.0017184117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018601409,0.0009911957,0.9449041,0.00019252447,0.0002536251,0.0005175889,0.0013931453,0.0009801837,0.0006732292,0.004613648,0.011435377,0.032185268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108224056,0.00047857923,0.98591506,0.00007891811,0.00008920659,0.00029654143,0.0023185303,0.002618815,0.00036490805,0.0017017537,0.005991976,0.00003756391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013649618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014166978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013649618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000653029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037442154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0367285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174579370","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13158","title":"When social assistance meets market power: A mixed duopoly view of health insurance in the United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicaid; Duopoly; Inefficiency; Market power; Economics; Product (mathematics); Population; Product differentiation; Public economics; Quality (philosophy); Microeconomics; Health insurance; Business; Health care; Welfare; Social Welfare; Market economy; Monopoly; Economic growth; Medicine","score_opus":0.0964383280207757,"score_gpt":0.3149630927080859,"score_spread":0.21852476468731022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174579370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37515712,0.0039735413,0.13407244,0.036533672,0.0003709437,0.00035183434,0.002484007,0.00019518784,0.4468613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97843254,0.00088645355,0.0025605937,0.0007006722,0.00011990543,0.0001130901,0.000091937654,0.000029657254,0.017065093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983512,0.00062498305,0.00004184259,0.00023537592,0.00016286019,0.0005837762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685425,0.0017219421,0.00039791898,0.0001318616,0.00020585525,0.0006882177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022234842,0.0007543737,0.0019839967,0.0011696629,0.0018398716,0.008178792,0.0020061084,0.004416231,0.020825338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047679264,0.0012565899,0.0015177607,0.0009644557,0.0037347,0.0064977314,0.0031315682,0.0036331443,0.0010716256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001215923,0.00015322366,0.0014083415,0.000083968676,0.000052104584,0.00057409576,0.00023920657,0.09777298,0.00045620257,0.89060116,0.0053158845,0.00322131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021956488,0.00014533821,0.0016197708,0.00015082431,0.00006432716,0.0002974801,0.00096131937,0.3073673,0.0001882381,0.67781824,0.011079074,0.00008842101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030112464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023511326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030112464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060311323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032562576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06966764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177376132","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13099","title":"International sourcing, complementary inputs, and the structure of trade agreements: Deep, shallow, narrow, and wide","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Deep integration; International trade; Rules of origin; Trade agreement; Frontier; International economics; Economics; Welfare; Commercial policy; Free trade; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03710266587203198,"score_gpt":0.221666322671311,"score_spread":0.18456365679927902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177376132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92827237,0.0004659571,0.026024519,0.0007066207,0.000012538022,0.000060819777,0.00009142468,0.000014579467,0.0443512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975975,0.000105838204,0.0011533285,0.000021811846,0.000007089676,0.00001757458,0.000015968482,0.0000024289827,0.001078412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987219,0.00052678975,0.00005698484,0.00015653977,0.00027106548,0.00026664522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875688,0.0074663805,0.0030075514,0.0005420688,0.0006973752,0.0007177869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036403597,0.0002926761,0.00072104996,0.0016554208,0.0013176027,0.0051224628,0.00057996175,0.0010463184,0.006332275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010205383,0.00023045641,0.0005827042,0.0020027861,0.004566484,0.0041021435,0.0029402075,0.0012339378,0.00028964953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022456187,0.0001921285,0.041359585,0.00013561147,0.0001274839,0.00028420112,0.0010234353,0.07575031,0.0026041958,0.85702765,0.00052986445,0.020740898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010246027,0.0001960651,0.0232276,0.00016604066,0.00011029682,0.000094020856,0.0020523202,0.06089144,0.0016642661,0.90748304,0.003977248,0.000035285506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016632552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002170076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006332275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026624037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001460105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02118361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202852766","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13025","title":"Transaction fee economics in the Ethereum blockchain","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Database transaction; Blockchain; Unit price; Transaction cost; Unit (ring theory); Service (business); Block (permutation group theory); Economics; Econometrics; Business; Microeconomics; Computer science; Database; Computer security; Economy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022594736875214867,"score_gpt":0.24911329149274014,"score_spread":0.22651855461752526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202852766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9454813,0.0007333158,0.041419122,0.0019078419,0.00002987191,0.000043292934,0.0002422489,0.00007775787,0.010065232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975073,0.00015435598,0.00064663275,0.000021479462,0.000011775647,0.000007843,0.000030003395,0.0000058137844,0.0016148746],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990233,0.00046276065,0.00003229584,0.00010880644,0.0001821232,0.00019077722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842868,0.011892822,0.0020808037,0.00050936034,0.00069092814,0.0005392558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022188069,0.00027494258,0.0006796758,0.00094729994,0.00058030186,0.0019199929,0.0007526593,0.0010649632,0.0071106344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01737275,0.00029357342,0.0003338986,0.0010516775,0.0017438228,0.0051278775,0.00096592976,0.0011079753,0.00034582423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002592552,0.00022039005,0.021018688,0.00009476742,0.0000571108,0.00061113876,0.00020815922,0.6142471,0.0018014003,0.34748924,0.0018979043,0.012094926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005226407,0.00007839065,0.008119768,0.000020148978,0.000016042979,0.000089991365,0.00017026931,0.8396115,0.0005410477,0.15003379,0.0012265623,0.000040172887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075952983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049305614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075952983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002053292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001054238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023787439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211015691","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13071","title":"All rights reserved: Copyright protection and multinational knowledge transfers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Industrial organization; Intellectual property; Business; Economics; Creative industries; International trade; Commerce; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.1719129661763925,"score_gpt":0.25370765633798464,"score_spread":0.08179469016159213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211015691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6968593,0.0014245805,0.0007454653,0.003960071,0.000030854066,0.000040168514,0.0005271305,0.000031205498,0.29638132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98866814,0.00036031395,0.000063422754,0.00011042459,0.000026654414,0.000009457207,0.000090578564,0.0000049777173,0.010665962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986827,0.00040357522,0.000080033315,0.00014671285,0.00040908295,0.00027790564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731025,0.01406961,0.008963553,0.001496356,0.0012762822,0.0010916749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019011988,0.00016155474,0.00025876393,0.0010714724,0.00088981463,0.0037284652,0.00041422172,0.00066164194,0.0690436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021407448,0.00006917908,0.00024631034,0.0015797106,0.0020515781,0.0018229228,0.0016582198,0.0005686618,0.0020203306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007256244,0.0007060691,0.5246813,0.00033825554,0.00019806928,0.0015074403,0.0034595476,0.012197355,0.0027290208,0.2148374,0.011518358,0.22710153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012977778,0.00035998915,0.7575072,0.00069640984,0.00015757071,0.0010938649,0.007816006,0.00830178,0.006391527,0.12143458,0.096057646,0.0000536625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0091960225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053480756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0690436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018867996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001743782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2309739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231037590","doi":"10.1111/ecin.2016.54.issue-1","title":"RECONCILING MICRO AND MACRO ESTIMATES OF THE FRISCH LABOR SUPPLY ELASTICITY","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Asian Industrial and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.037427623641011445,"score_gpt":0.2958632771202242,"score_spread":0.25843565347921277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231037590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8061523,0.0040750145,0.1056728,0.004095753,0.000138706,0.00012301147,0.006439691,0.00029966212,0.0730031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871488,0.0007412057,0.006912139,0.0001918648,0.00006786029,0.000064340195,0.0024658754,0.000040720737,0.0023671219],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986527,0.0005045448,0.00009705819,0.0002801303,0.00034854602,0.000116979434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928536,0.0040779375,0.0011222678,0.0011523272,0.0007049233,0.00008900312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038339472,0.0002792996,0.00027339775,0.0025122566,0.0003370802,0.0010088898,0.0005406917,0.0003478185,0.004143445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015419281,0.00021914074,0.0003002772,0.0019065766,0.0005101852,0.0012108271,0.0012042085,0.0007072513,0.00076366373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020544721,0.000089100395,0.56344,0.0003595516,0.0005510362,0.00031984487,0.0028009585,0.047941163,0.0016538379,0.20444575,0.018435074,0.15975828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035513196,0.00006394278,0.7763924,0.0003607343,0.00015138178,0.00024989573,0.0030856621,0.032836236,0.00509965,0.122143134,0.059457198,0.00012429853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011004215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010621347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011004215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012438779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046293574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021880329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287652832","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13220","title":"Whoever you want me to be: Personality and incentives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Personality; Extraversion and introversion; Incentive; Psychology; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits; Misrepresentation; Locus of control; Alternative five model of personality; Personality Assessment Inventory; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.08231387778834567,"score_gpt":0.37449036618783477,"score_spread":0.29217648839948906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287652832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996349,0.00008089057,0.00041296802,0.00031543942,0.00003527985,0.000021917707,0.000030516849,0.0000060393663,0.0027479604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983058,0.00004168937,0.0003089118,0.0001428893,0.000011305635,0.000013819007,0.000016822984,0.0000026755154,0.0011560278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974414,0.0017058928,0.000081575556,0.00015424528,0.00044565275,0.00017117122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97552264,0.012916076,0.006475914,0.001709241,0.0009258589,0.0024502529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004181112,0.00022197739,0.0004127625,0.00030089248,0.00053282676,0.0021407052,0.00018356793,0.00057338894,0.00457437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021769105,0.00018496666,0.0001636311,0.00022778276,0.0006141956,0.00045322438,0.00056032103,0.0009657182,0.00068034104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044044307,0.007304105,0.8600392,0.00020939298,0.0003490274,0.00045745663,0.0028749788,0.0018612549,0.021548256,0.0036467,0.0028410237,0.09446413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012609285,0.002694298,0.98249763,0.000067183115,0.00006740233,0.00022950638,0.0018322965,0.004287609,0.0024703695,0.0037798847,0.0018834631,0.00006428792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041883579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060324837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00457437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027205344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000366725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022112131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291278162","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13006","title":"Issue Information","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Mannheim; Universität Kassel; University of California, Santa Barbara; Institut für Weltwirtschaft; University of California, Davis; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; York University; University of Colorado Denver; University of California, San Diego; University of Oregon; Montana State University; University of Notre Dame; Southern Methodist University; Washington State University; Boston College; University of California, Irvine; Georgetown University; Michigan State University; California Institute of Technology; George Washington University; University of Maryland, Baltimore County; University of Wyoming; University of Cincinnati; University of Connecticut; Ohio State University","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.047867833274652875,"score_gpt":0.23968651861824933,"score_spread":0.19181868534359645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291278162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027188048,0.0006124806,0.0007016773,0.0051631727,0.018250208,0.00046203766,0.04011715,0.0018512793,0.9325701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010157857,0.00036880554,0.00026447585,0.0014384966,0.0015187643,0.00012836467,0.010496482,0.00050426373,0.98426455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986437,0.00014935945,0.00010023685,0.00018752874,0.0007438457,0.00017543127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99338984,0.0010624782,0.00023438451,0.00077724044,0.0032484685,0.0012876122],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014153698,0.0010157548,0.0014811067,0.002983202,0.0016483072,0.0057519153,0.0019221242,0.0023950248,0.9413207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011323695,0.000517179,0.0008018688,0.0028754182,0.00043103943,0.003041374,0.0019111154,0.0021145379,0.8860871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022793964,0.000016061693,0.000034340843,0.00009862674,0.0000012846702,0.000012526899,0.000007653612,0.000014607112,0.000054221357,0.00088041596,0.98461825,0.014239221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012359423,0.000011646513,0.0001764768,0.00008937687,0.0000015026089,0.000018819395,0.000020696283,0.00003294363,0.00006938025,0.0005101556,0.99905294,0.000003599103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024050153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049402397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058679283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013850438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024050784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08369887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309202627","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13122","title":"The spillover effects of parental verbal conflict on classmates' cognitive and noncognitive outcomes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Parental Involvement in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Spillover effect; Peer effects; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Variation (astronomy); Test (biology); Control (management); Identification (biology); Peer group; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.04596952918376305,"score_gpt":0.348673834448911,"score_spread":0.3027043052651479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309202627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981343,0.000082971375,0.00013457569,0.00003319331,0.0000037043435,0.000006547743,0.000058368027,0.000004504685,0.0015418084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951017,0.000049874867,0.00009331947,0.000011370416,0.0000035008604,0.000008129178,0.000040211835,0.0000016902744,0.0002818254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981073,0.00088459783,0.00005964587,0.0002063087,0.00048525867,0.0002569454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861616,0.0072451187,0.0023155797,0.0016131394,0.0008404088,0.0018241064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020834378,0.00040350348,0.00042785204,0.00087638246,0.0005618141,0.001008369,0.00043446524,0.0002814533,0.005710746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010982509,0.00017721967,0.0004710484,0.00041466462,0.0005882764,0.00034157155,0.001980023,0.0008532095,0.0002543695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005674764,0.0012594949,0.96547437,0.000049895338,0.00039124012,0.00045983872,0.0013927863,0.0006177014,0.0027220494,0.0005512392,0.00023517844,0.026278771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056820295,0.00034570848,0.9975038,0.00001889624,0.00005929688,0.000102814556,0.00077915785,0.00020417733,0.0006879175,0.00016660335,0.00011959899,0.0000062681343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003462196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035418018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005710746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041858634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040760712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019104362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311514741","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13127","title":"Cautions when normalizing the dependent variable in a regression as a <i>z</i>‐score","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normalization (sociology); Mathematics; Regression; Statistics; Variable (mathematics); Econometrics; Bounded function; Transformation (genetics); Linear regression; Omitted-variable bias; Regression analysis; Inference; Applied mathematics; Economics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1773966423125695,"score_gpt":0.3910471219627705,"score_spread":0.21365047965020104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311514741","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028979875,0.0037069614,0.8263627,0.10232253,0.009283393,0.00089834916,0.0008210918,0.0022634973,0.025361562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29381981,0.0018987786,0.6526552,0.034018196,0.003189085,0.0028661024,0.00027950923,0.0016792673,0.00959404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.66109806,0.2841027,0.015652636,0.009589092,0.02861502,0.0009424567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3901274,0.5240567,0.018297976,0.042329673,0.02428147,0.0009067117],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.29934806,0.0015564909,0.0023375333,0.0033518886,0.0029455058,0.0061363326,0.0058196564,0.0033994575,0.0058602304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6278941,0.0013226715,0.0018786401,0.0053185457,0.011607659,0.004847907,0.0035259523,0.013520678,0.0032142485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008438682,0.00028011794,0.024485026,0.0014683668,0.0010046235,0.00071683625,0.01334874,0.0057679475,0.003992244,0.48725814,0.1295365,0.33129767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039184227,0.000498339,0.036881596,0.004032299,0.00061695575,0.001155279,0.007209695,0.03504569,0.01894527,0.7256018,0.16915311,0.000468267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00981546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014154017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29934806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003615125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004011562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8640286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315641457","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13135","title":"Optimal unemployment policy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Royal Economic Society; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Unemployment; Economics; Variety (cybernetics); Consumption smoothing; Indirect Inference; Consumption (sociology); Fiscal policy; Inference; Externality; Population; Public economics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Macroeconomics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0589988412180912,"score_gpt":0.2879785981256027,"score_spread":0.22897975690751152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315641457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48859203,0.0043229978,0.21066128,0.030638017,0.001133918,0.00068175077,0.0022353982,0.00076887413,0.26096573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98008716,0.00044985217,0.006702289,0.00068846456,0.00012987794,0.00011411528,0.00014936591,0.000034374832,0.011644467],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988331,0.00048451265,0.000042482596,0.00021763817,0.000102449805,0.00031977103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855345,0.0008367576,0.00017187351,0.000082639956,0.00015794834,0.00019730086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013049794,0.00050488237,0.0015472259,0.0005301049,0.0007277878,0.0017618479,0.0007455472,0.002040107,0.012114257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073877736,0.00050419796,0.00040591956,0.0003256056,0.00072868384,0.0012291324,0.0012697689,0.0014833855,0.0010427744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088796904,0.00036154443,0.0051764403,0.00039586402,0.00015083485,0.0002002328,0.00023674205,0.5519587,0.0016751103,0.366491,0.028191287,0.044274297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003094036,0.0002637414,0.0046956297,0.00021681053,0.00010302808,0.00008004605,0.0005419868,0.7341546,0.0009444777,0.24482502,0.013821704,0.00004357269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063788844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038616003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012114257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020081764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035984907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04052621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321225883","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13140","title":"The long‐run agglomeration effects of early agriculture in Europe","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Archaeology and ancient environmental studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economies of agglomeration; Agriculture; Context (archaeology); Economic geography; Middle East; Economics; Agricultural economics; Urban agglomeration; Geography; Economy; Archaeology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.010683013635728305,"score_gpt":0.19909048708670632,"score_spread":0.18840747345097802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321225883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981487,0.00041830292,0.00017886219,0.0001490443,0.000004686048,0.0000016042493,0.00024119204,0.000009465292,0.00084821985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992912,0.00013916478,0.000057273686,0.000014666432,0.000005625911,0.0000014885544,0.0002504524,0.0000031268562,0.00023701505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991529,0.00024677697,0.000059037102,0.00022791489,0.000098505916,0.00021481737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996702,0.0010994332,0.0010083747,0.00032672306,0.0003537909,0.0005096061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011387625,0.00028811514,0.00042142541,0.001182597,0.0005611946,0.001451281,0.0003146146,0.00050447707,0.002837434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026094986,0.000169711,0.0006293257,0.0017313698,0.0011642145,0.00073057157,0.0018489716,0.0005766101,0.00029386525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020691092,0.000082658305,0.9828303,0.000035610414,0.00045167387,0.00026524017,0.00045113664,0.0053438046,0.0009944055,0.0016625046,0.00047951099,0.007196092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006344107,0.000040248702,0.9971879,0.000015728823,0.000059251648,0.000030689116,0.00042277377,0.00071275514,0.00022450017,0.00024210998,0.001051508,0.0000062466565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023582835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034841027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023582835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010363912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004855852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046891153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381686212","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13164","title":"Exploration versus exploitation: A laboratory test of the single‐agent exponential bandit model","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Econometrics; Economics; Exponential function; Test (biology); Psychology; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17052905538818666,"score_gpt":0.3576517087907351,"score_spread":0.18712265340254844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381686212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992739,0.000046921847,0.005394376,0.00021475514,0.000019586683,0.000066915105,0.00007460841,0.000030671104,0.00141303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939268,0.000038172366,0.0045896177,0.00018330007,0.00001619302,0.00019023019,0.000071172144,0.000012033573,0.00097253517],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977545,0.0016403699,0.00008678317,0.0002303343,0.00016061674,0.00012735113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94302034,0.04702757,0.005169365,0.0033260174,0.00066715933,0.00078948884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067802565,0.0005232323,0.00084656087,0.00021623005,0.0002872953,0.0011595478,0.001003971,0.0011396599,0.0040620235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030394629,0.00025855406,0.00043127412,0.00023335447,0.0010332036,0.0009872998,0.0007925523,0.001517778,0.00042094904],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.054544475,0.050493427,0.14006123,0.0016939741,0.002076229,0.0013346719,0.0042186244,0.3838156,0.12315132,0.08487311,0.009054826,0.14468256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036880474,0.028515672,0.037997987,0.00011283837,0.0003389881,0.00020075275,0.0009338929,0.8570853,0.017474381,0.05157887,0.001897382,0.00017588811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007525331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037671294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067802565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040951459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038671907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035857856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386317013","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13173","title":"Sports injuries and game stakes: Concussions in the National Football League","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"League; Football; Incentive; LOOM; Tournament; Competition (biology); Sports economics; Football team; Psychology; Match play; Advertising; Actuarial science; Economics; Marketing; Business; Engineering; Political science; Microeconomics; Medicine; Physical therapy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0830984326335011,"score_gpt":0.28487728140334545,"score_spread":0.20177884876984437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386317013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99609715,0.00018331005,0.00033198352,0.0004262999,0.000007274806,0.000011615886,0.00034794895,0.0000036292308,0.002590927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993587,0.00003357086,0.000030422347,0.000012597217,0.000008234099,0.000002223842,0.00013707986,4.7204773e-7,0.00041673888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990447,0.00027780153,0.00007584805,0.00012454957,0.00028266292,0.00019439243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98732114,0.002986108,0.006770515,0.00021799243,0.0007186568,0.0019855793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012072502,0.00026508444,0.00029067503,0.0014484974,0.0003499235,0.0014555502,0.0004907264,0.00067764195,0.004891288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010375156,0.00015510744,0.0003323282,0.0010176954,0.00067385775,0.00062709843,0.0013065651,0.0009831078,0.00036381147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007478407,0.00014488037,0.9962794,0.00000964971,0.000044800767,0.000057432626,0.00004674385,0.0009915906,0.000055657383,0.0005062788,0.00017951112,0.0016091804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055361857,0.00009071183,0.9959727,0.000014477548,0.000015705073,0.000052829862,0.00032614355,0.0025787076,0.00006045898,0.000658194,0.00021900647,0.000005494937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032236136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034446087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032236136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010235992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004310807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06409699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387673280","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13182","title":"Race and the Income‐Achievement Gap","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McMaster University","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Race (biology); Demographic economics; Indigenous; Family income; Economic inequality; Inequality; Economics; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Demography; Economic growth; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.054419175951724935,"score_gpt":0.3347969788012489,"score_spread":0.28037780284952396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387673280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99442637,0.0003097414,0.00010914273,0.00036524102,0.000011520763,0.0000017623456,0.0002559004,0.000003577468,0.004516803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959,0.000050695016,0.00002939963,0.000014890186,0.000006674639,0.0000014465264,0.000069383255,0.0000016554058,0.00023597475],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993487,0.00022816357,0.00003911061,0.00009068081,0.00014415795,0.00014926148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942386,0.0021322859,0.0021689723,0.00025447574,0.00052113895,0.0006845671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010268458,0.000087175766,0.00023528855,0.0007827552,0.00048160428,0.0008730706,0.00026945322,0.00021704532,0.006159011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008120329,0.000067424735,0.00015821973,0.00091794255,0.0004527373,0.00053951924,0.0011237629,0.00046887505,0.00047168866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076210505,0.00007186807,0.9892603,0.000015291356,0.000041509167,0.000111386114,0.00067702145,0.00010775586,0.00015935766,0.0023307353,0.0003972327,0.006751346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017344327,0.000020768273,0.9973442,0.000019936724,0.000011037775,0.00007662816,0.0007304648,0.00020931929,0.000096481876,0.0007875215,0.000698983,0.0000029325117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056096055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054698503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006159011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024940344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035867523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020603955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390483975","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13199","title":"Dynamic preferential trade agreement formation and the role of political economy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Incentive; Flexibility (engineering); International economics; International free trade agreement; International trade; Free trade; Politics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.03499170125242041,"score_gpt":0.2270454349545184,"score_spread":0.192053733702098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390483975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6187975,0.00041686586,0.21788332,0.004402981,0.000111499045,0.00012540192,0.0002292944,0.00015218096,0.15788098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99526346,0.00007153826,0.0017690345,0.00007549903,0.00001088225,0.000018382325,0.000013065724,0.0000058120804,0.0027723166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810034,0.0009952225,0.00005558889,0.00027449915,0.00018195303,0.00039242528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906193,0.0051824576,0.001960733,0.0008147868,0.00057648995,0.0008461522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00350917,0.00022754529,0.0006282242,0.000576869,0.0010456633,0.0035242322,0.00078454486,0.001170204,0.009924304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011407799,0.00029956407,0.0004491994,0.00062475837,0.0034855488,0.002952077,0.0018524588,0.0014603963,0.0004423528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008269013,0.00005980888,0.0046521937,0.000039943643,0.000028194198,0.00013317826,0.00019131198,0.057721034,0.0007257261,0.9285212,0.0010148353,0.0068299044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008643023,0.00006754497,0.003696697,0.00003400763,0.000026554113,0.0000889378,0.0004308048,0.16175094,0.00054776145,0.82674545,0.006500273,0.000024754387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041326275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040111467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009924304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026097714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017716949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033200085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394692754","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13219","title":"A (dynamic) investigation of stereotypes, belief‐updating, and behavior","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn; University of Toronto; Dartmouth College; Arizona State University; Harvard Business School","keywords":"Negative feedback; Persistence (discontinuity); Social psychology; Psychology; Dynamic decision-making","score_opus":0.045035832117689176,"score_gpt":0.34732290092097934,"score_spread":0.30228706880329015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394692754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99843425,0.000013916728,0.00028730955,0.00003962511,0.000006034958,0.00001981385,0.000035379926,0.000003391192,0.0011602264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988166,0.000013301978,0.0004899207,0.000034886776,0.0000056005574,0.000044613294,0.000025317431,0.0000026089187,0.0005672712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987565,0.00070225826,0.00004329346,0.00019834645,0.00019001731,0.00010950953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781219,0.015597537,0.0034887567,0.001600214,0.00045900446,0.0007325929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002810085,0.00024507815,0.00029341283,0.00031591876,0.0005254281,0.0012884052,0.00032434246,0.0005996101,0.006202941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01278078,0.0002735234,0.00016256767,0.00020840824,0.0008551339,0.0005545269,0.0004733532,0.0008201939,0.00029923065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023780279,0.082445614,0.594335,0.00045613173,0.00037932597,0.0006203885,0.021810448,0.00470333,0.13723867,0.013436755,0.002573167,0.11822084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016571176,0.02647482,0.91261345,0.000083798426,0.00018792284,0.00023750123,0.006542995,0.017309442,0.020531759,0.010152592,0.0040499903,0.00015858107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002099798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017251332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006202941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050549774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045332074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02075088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399140975","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13230","title":"Replication of “How much does immigration boost innovation?”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Open Philanthropy Project","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Economics; Immigration; Neoclassical economics; Economic geography; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.031145977258114965,"score_gpt":0.3348171824993724,"score_spread":0.30367120524125746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399140975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9134302,0.003601679,0.012194054,0.016452242,0.0017918296,0.00043889656,0.0035715487,0.00023216287,0.04828725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99156886,0.00032965216,0.0016164577,0.0011761106,0.00028129254,0.000103589766,0.0004335155,0.000023981594,0.0044664084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994487,0.0032303631,0.00021606017,0.0012294962,0.0005764088,0.00026071823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9220396,0.047549084,0.0069786655,0.016460057,0.005305057,0.0016674893],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0136068575,0.00050096936,0.00093744724,0.0009254722,0.0007968791,0.0016811058,0.0017141144,0.0014201731,0.020993412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059481766,0.00021637524,0.0023014862,0.0010574295,0.0017101715,0.0014142792,0.0021114624,0.0017629341,0.0019601833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008571421,0.0038434889,0.5683791,0.0025302449,0.008573465,0.001719773,0.007619902,0.0089191,0.012289022,0.14075296,0.03429656,0.20250496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001447002,0.003924642,0.74044806,0.00078642054,0.0060034,0.0005293032,0.01008519,0.01498753,0.012224524,0.15545225,0.05393083,0.0001807855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007231052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041146707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98639315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009939806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021281524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07196081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403779669","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13257","title":"Reducing the replication time for structural estimations: A successful replication of “An Anatomy of International Trade” using GPU computing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Computer science; Economics; International trade; Biology; Virology","score_opus":0.07866133106022884,"score_gpt":0.32865420144419116,"score_spread":0.24999287038396234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403779669","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24373822,0.0007863068,0.7174761,0.004052524,0.0021767723,0.00068307185,0.0035797642,0.017652698,0.009854623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4911322,0.00015915727,0.49965048,0.00044488633,0.00015128693,0.00066703814,0.00320831,0.002746039,0.001840558],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98523396,0.008740963,0.0010003144,0.0021265864,0.0023766854,0.0005215394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8858157,0.03689417,0.0018389084,0.061168052,0.013389825,0.0008933979],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017996268,0.0012230503,0.0013387608,0.0016486682,0.0018740774,0.0024875551,0.003578226,0.0013244868,0.00779109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15467267,0.0010901635,0.0021666784,0.0038548706,0.0016098821,0.0033045954,0.0037236558,0.0035083299,0.0036597946],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018197319,0.0010312516,0.0589681,0.0007135765,0.0014380622,0.0017224512,0.004428851,0.12960897,0.016468184,0.047267754,0.098419495,0.63811356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009559453,0.00040779996,0.011023528,0.00020863808,0.00036932132,0.0004532223,0.0011902129,0.82469404,0.019676317,0.08907824,0.051726334,0.00021638624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014741385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013253524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98200375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011267328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003764795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09517449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406820606","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13275","title":"Idiosyncratic asset return and wage risk of US households","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Association for Applied Econometrics","keywords":"Economics; Wage; Asset (computer security); Systematic risk; Risk–return spectrum; Labour economics; Financial economics; Portfolio; Computer science","score_opus":0.012343073085269692,"score_gpt":0.22981335231640393,"score_spread":0.21747027923113424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406820606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986603,0.000039288912,0.0003425002,0.000042918422,0.0000013627263,0.0000022328334,0.00038227357,0.000004552118,0.0005245763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995486,0.000017572196,0.000058196485,0.0000058189294,0.0000022568797,0.000001096775,0.0002664654,6.7450725e-7,0.0000992879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968505,0.00011540292,0.00003250014,0.000060017795,0.00006686568,0.000040200695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995427,0.0014743822,0.002190593,0.00038744477,0.00031932312,0.0002012281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079190236,0.00011431996,0.00019675682,0.0005845039,0.000112925554,0.00049142033,0.00012850853,0.00019000852,0.001835694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005502945,0.00007691413,0.00013247304,0.0009697321,0.00020296218,0.00026299423,0.00039053816,0.0003234257,0.00019565922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006691295,0.000025742953,0.99117845,0.0000052439277,0.0000650064,0.00004584156,0.00013586797,0.0018537269,0.00023256188,0.0008359001,0.0002509146,0.005303738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002806987,0.00004330636,0.99347043,0.0000055920473,0.000013551746,0.00008310545,0.00017582587,0.0042373347,0.00025904915,0.00138598,0.000315979,0.0000070402352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027578794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026689197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027578794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019070022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011485558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0061410666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407594617","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13279","title":"Underpowered studies and exaggerated effects: A replication and re‐evaluation of the magnitude of anchoring effects","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"California Air Resources Board; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Anchoring; Replication (statistics); Magnitude (astronomy); Economics; Econometrics; Psychology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.2327895439360776,"score_gpt":0.47645863059627397,"score_spread":0.24366908666019638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407594617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42246276,0.06552335,0.421601,0.039709546,0.012725819,0.011843712,0.0014211383,0.0011913199,0.023521362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89361346,0.002227398,0.09477345,0.0041423216,0.0010920577,0.0029800225,0.00016802871,0.00021728755,0.00078604417],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.36384147,0.49314097,0.062435832,0.018762778,0.05991628,0.0019025606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03937456,0.7511995,0.039558314,0.1170846,0.0518626,0.00092038605],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.639731,0.0020334416,0.0030138316,0.0046072253,0.0018570583,0.0055340836,0.0060763787,0.0048081665,0.0041218405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.88676244,0.001449591,0.0061563463,0.0027643195,0.010376942,0.0063160253,0.0048897816,0.0063020317,0.0006506432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015987901,0.0013975243,0.16642071,0.030470127,0.043866448,0.003578829,0.04153667,0.00526173,0.016089305,0.0663413,0.018381324,0.590668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009041921,0.020874597,0.30851763,0.052592527,0.08747145,0.009178231,0.020080462,0.034015596,0.08164803,0.21396764,0.16046776,0.0021441206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020119012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018067798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.360269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030052557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004495876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44427586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408384349","doi":"10.1111/ecin.13285","title":"Introduction to the symposium on reproducibility and replicability in economics: Part I","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Italy: Economic History and Contemporary Issues","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Reproducibility; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03125578537913157,"score_gpt":0.24117229479902658,"score_spread":0.209916509419895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408384349","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010247035,0.15405737,0.08200333,0.42934197,0.26088837,0.00077279884,0.0010660342,0.0006194128,0.07022604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04755835,0.14546801,0.07856938,0.18998846,0.44673926,0.0033896691,0.0013493488,0.0018979001,0.085039645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9528518,0.026287422,0.0036076433,0.0054891477,0.01044161,0.001322257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88788867,0.075081185,0.004753785,0.008940369,0.019219818,0.004116134],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06514471,0.0022599516,0.002416237,0.0050183875,0.0060175895,0.019782735,0.0045220694,0.011864094,0.025548108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.124624,0.001555884,0.0046671955,0.004617672,0.016131949,0.015633754,0.009435492,0.025660066,0.011836873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058643265,0.000037498845,0.000242543,0.0011679502,0.00009291565,0.00011639605,0.0017792681,0.00053485355,0.0004591787,0.32870948,0.62012047,0.046680808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017223505,0.00006643234,0.0003709516,0.0015741839,0.00002979357,0.00018291059,0.0003716251,0.00038226563,0.00018297305,0.13174517,0.8649963,0.00008024832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002478381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015784603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9348553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009170364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01042937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3445223},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4412721958","doi":"10.1111/ecin.70009","title":"A reappraisal of real‐time forecasts of the real price of oil","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Oil price; Econometrics; Real-time data; Keynesian economics; Monetary economics; Financial economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.023330825797822245,"score_gpt":0.2541100289235396,"score_spread":0.23077920312571737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412721958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93461555,0.0027472088,0.040339682,0.007155346,0.0011758426,0.000041954976,0.0009211137,0.0007583829,0.012244886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923983,0.00036810996,0.0059152087,0.00021290901,0.00015628911,0.0000057867273,0.00025054012,0.000030061443,0.0006628612],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981067,0.00064119196,0.000100837155,0.00035900407,0.00071938685,0.00007294201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98969144,0.0038037447,0.0009172027,0.0023282068,0.003009895,0.00024952836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004513118,0.00037133164,0.0005124208,0.0012761349,0.00031573718,0.0027814738,0.00083325815,0.0008974736,0.0009730745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0333529,0.00021034287,0.00042034214,0.0009951432,0.00064278656,0.003099044,0.0011400611,0.0016380942,0.00041846168],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018813801,0.0005076142,0.108337045,0.00048043637,0.0009993641,0.0005999942,0.0017321979,0.33216092,0.017837133,0.019008556,0.017474022,0.49898136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018699835,0.0008354127,0.10828218,0.00039829567,0.00048231738,0.00032238854,0.0013051657,0.8031043,0.030184368,0.027216418,0.027415965,0.00026618235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019173982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014718355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019173982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014839754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013137702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03812474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413019156","doi":"10.1111/ecin.70011","title":"Building the walls of international trade after war: Can dispute resolution mechanisms (DRMs) help?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; International trade; Dispute resolution; International economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03554685758352944,"score_gpt":0.2389465877436529,"score_spread":0.20339973016012347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413019156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41703308,0.041372687,0.038400203,0.28335738,0.0018607682,0.0002612617,0.00027478492,0.000241979,0.21719787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98712325,0.0045154477,0.003257814,0.002089601,0.00025555087,0.000046267243,0.000035419227,0.000019429746,0.002657253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597746,0.0026226672,0.00011044605,0.00025870174,0.0003089429,0.0007218497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846502,0.00854731,0.0038855243,0.0009041859,0.00068873673,0.0013240528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010935997,0.00044483598,0.0007983312,0.0016772473,0.0022384673,0.0104438,0.0016021385,0.004061258,0.015040666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026462814,0.00036573416,0.00074586226,0.0016613726,0.0076606167,0.013650356,0.0043452177,0.0035491332,0.0012929406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025830997,0.00037443766,0.012427326,0.0004172446,0.00012439498,0.00046404303,0.0022827866,0.007823481,0.00039263995,0.8767369,0.010198024,0.088500395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012791027,0.00022556166,0.010309897,0.0013725236,0.00008938718,0.00025696156,0.013325207,0.0094075985,0.00059295533,0.90095574,0.06326389,0.00007237345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012875857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008679235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015040666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019174232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029823312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057835758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413339052","doi":"10.1111/ecin.70013","title":"The economic effects of long‐term climate change: Evidence from the Little Ice Age: Replication","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Tree-ring climate responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Guelph; University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Term (time); Economics; Climate change; Natural resource economics; Geology; Medicine; Physics; Oceanography","score_opus":0.04364764814301364,"score_gpt":0.29509640690364575,"score_spread":0.2514487587606321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413339052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677002,0.007157717,0.0014745458,0.0025006046,0.00025972925,0.00014010354,0.0053287926,0.000029884663,0.01540848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607605,0.00069939176,0.00031489352,0.00042263378,0.00010111232,0.00005843171,0.0011123258,0.000016061644,0.0011989438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911342,0.005138083,0.0007866058,0.0013012075,0.0009317038,0.0007081374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7537039,0.14998913,0.0361625,0.043235835,0.014380033,0.002528584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024530228,0.0004782111,0.0011399606,0.0016779437,0.0015153317,0.001972457,0.002446022,0.0010987709,0.01137158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11349258,0.0003844339,0.0019460827,0.0037828132,0.0027252212,0.0014379484,0.002395843,0.0008937351,0.0015576131],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029112827,0.00035221182,0.9521468,0.0008981564,0.0044395467,0.001016723,0.004877704,0.0016035445,0.00061088,0.0038885388,0.007193736,0.020060806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038168096,0.00030673915,0.9738186,0.0005646724,0.0019210565,0.00023593087,0.0054465113,0.0009339643,0.0007492171,0.0034425915,0.012124331,0.000074602176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07400339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04783826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97546977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009388286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015380351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14714533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416387362","doi":"10.1111/ecin.70026","title":"Introduction to the symposium on reproducibility and replicability in economics: Part II","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Replication (statistics); Commodity; Technological change; Instrumental variable; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03104319678122821,"score_gpt":0.30385642078685715,"score_spread":0.27281322400562896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416387362","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001497468,0.16132262,0.107720174,0.39187917,0.28975588,0.000577552,0.00065489043,0.00049902394,0.04609325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060354587,0.09913349,0.0716789,0.19706611,0.5115151,0.0032494466,0.0008086777,0.0016784571,0.054515194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94380665,0.033456426,0.0040398627,0.0068301377,0.010388939,0.001477962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.814761,0.14234781,0.0047079697,0.017535405,0.017897354,0.0027505849],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08356265,0.0018717812,0.0033789093,0.003680598,0.004416755,0.014286185,0.0046311514,0.011378792,0.021230893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15962888,0.001369137,0.0050128833,0.0028480932,0.022172574,0.017322443,0.008311686,0.027949871,0.0074771373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091035494,0.000051021354,0.0003124197,0.0012235115,0.00014892952,0.00016432711,0.0016287549,0.00077066734,0.0007219479,0.5248661,0.40921018,0.060811207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025870118,0.00009593754,0.00038867604,0.0014677282,0.000034563313,0.00021441793,0.00034738984,0.0006917464,0.000299827,0.30097696,0.6953582,0.000098664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014524091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007722544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070496053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062370403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44192684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W611025193","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12717","title":"INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND LABOR‐MARKET DISCRIMINATION","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Faculty of Arts, Ryerson University; Ryerson University","keywords":"Nepotism; Comparative advantage; Economics; Free trade; Price discrimination; Profit (economics); Product market; Order (exchange); Matching (statistics); Labour economics; International economics; International trade; Market economy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07520930236351873,"score_gpt":0.25564258963138237,"score_spread":0.18043328726786362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W611025193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54744315,0.020101292,0.018497832,0.07493337,0.0012837729,0.000028479302,0.0006443883,0.000059613678,0.33700803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98668414,0.0027205753,0.00038840022,0.0007249956,0.0006210508,0.000008763567,0.00009590101,0.000012898463,0.0087432815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935156,0.00027515824,0.000023170282,0.00008343811,0.00011696321,0.00014972483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946754,0.003278446,0.00082340575,0.00043877543,0.00035639358,0.00042753387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022855643,0.00025034903,0.0005332472,0.0010518829,0.00094479416,0.0029115097,0.0003469862,0.0014165532,0.01215469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011071638,0.0001076141,0.00024046376,0.0019912452,0.0025547943,0.0029249,0.0014938726,0.0014482298,0.00052305724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005254272,0.00007814222,0.014320741,0.00005336974,0.000023148128,0.00014332491,0.00057997287,0.0015149068,0.000102891114,0.94795895,0.012372254,0.022799894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000916531,0.000006590825,0.009885592,0.000050232607,0.000008664021,0.00006126384,0.0007149315,0.002374191,0.00005510048,0.97420645,0.012620977,0.0000066923817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033916847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002899778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01215469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011148454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008566542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040661514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W791821935","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12314","title":"INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION AND THE INDUSTRIAL COMPOSITION OF MULTINATIONAL ACTIVITY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Foreign direct investment; Imitation; Intellectual property; International trade; Technology transfer; Economics; Composition (language); Investment (military); International economics; Business; Industrial organization; Macroeconomics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.3090292166642115,"score_gpt":0.25188213981307184,"score_spread":0.05714707685113968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W791821935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9307184,0.0006065597,0.023461921,0.0020094006,0.000023031927,0.000059644128,0.00030192736,0.00007882122,0.042740144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954015,0.00022233685,0.0007283369,0.00004123505,0.000011702878,0.0000102369995,0.000047163765,0.000006253701,0.003531206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995073,0.00016983211,0.000015697611,0.00009751215,0.00006705998,0.00014253384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970892,0.0011536366,0.0010797695,0.0001856639,0.00013078508,0.00036106817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012432756,0.00031726915,0.0004849103,0.001011952,0.0006493147,0.002793731,0.0006889757,0.0009306352,0.009298783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004540703,0.00026979434,0.00067358423,0.0010067362,0.0018498931,0.0019330224,0.0015176046,0.0010751887,0.00083954073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075905386,0.00045465594,0.12789026,0.00018720875,0.00027309306,0.0010457316,0.0010539711,0.3478864,0.008647114,0.4628403,0.0022096005,0.04675271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003454739,0.00026709016,0.100832365,0.00010693754,0.0001301532,0.00065513025,0.0015559699,0.41615602,0.002225637,0.46926582,0.008383192,0.00007623823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054496415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040503214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009298783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001944741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008807208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031107485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}