{"meta":{"query_hash":"a67e2f4763c8","filters":{"venue":"Economic Issues Journal Articles"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a67e2f4763c8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Economic+Issues+Journal+Articles"},"results":[{"id":"W1587488684","doi":"","title":"Output volatility in the OECD: Are the member states becoming less vulnerable to exogenous shocks?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Issues Journal Articles","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Volatility (finance); Recession; Vulnerability (computing); Great recession; Monetary economics; Context (archaeology); Leverage (statistics); Great Moderation; Macroeconomics; Econometrics; Geography; Labour economics","score_opus":0.1231121399539313,"score_gpt":0.2679083031094727,"score_spread":0.14479616315554142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587488684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96828663,0.0018058254,0.000091345624,0.026751623,0.0004183851,0.0004030002,0.000044664223,0.00001770075,0.0021808152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99385905,0.00019853642,0.00022524685,0.0040218034,0.0005486686,0.00004757061,0.000002605376,0.000028309485,0.0010682293],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760514,0.00014560026,0.0011242296,0.0003621928,0.000040583804,0.0007222384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850243,0.00030675952,0.0004491127,0.0005440935,0.000013480938,0.00018410415],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027161138,0.0002515949,0.00050448754,0.00019356882,0.0005859422,0.0007917243,0.0007483725,0.000072901035,0.0030357093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009724262,0.00018288259,0.00016784342,0.0000776355,0.000084023995,0.0009042784,0.00009909296,0.0005056552,0.00672235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009761171,0.00032013556,0.7410474,0.000033377957,0.00028641723,0.00002932689,0.05650451,0.10138603,0.00004345379,0.0055863694,0.08197967,0.012685731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016794733,0.0002443879,0.45208603,0.00005044985,0.000026577647,0.00027280414,0.030961297,0.19030643,0.00059326336,0.18655801,0.13610573,0.0011155618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007370536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013523335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28896135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027913952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017790044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W237262426","doi":"","title":"Immigration and Housing Rents in Canada: A Panel Data Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Issues Journal Articles","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ordinary least squares; Panel data; Economics; Economic rent; Immigration; Econometrics; Unit root; Panel analysis; Error correction model; Cointegration; Unit (ring theory); Microeconomics; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.08213270803777942,"score_gpt":0.319173431281354,"score_spread":0.23704072324357459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W237262426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948639,0.00041140037,0.000105945415,0.004236627,0.00012063078,0.00003253465,0.000008670688,0.0000055105365,0.00021476747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988408,0.0003910861,0.00036163066,0.00013077959,0.00012288296,3.8296514e-7,0.000006250154,0.000002934236,0.00014323939],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929345,0.00012052806,0.00021908297,0.00011522679,0.00010664083,0.00014504605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995868,0.000027561642,0.000092074886,0.00011506203,0.000028163628,0.00015031625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090358633,0.000045536373,0.00011350453,0.00009202274,0.00013079864,0.0001606329,0.00015077695,0.000018422095,0.000079328085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082889615,0.000044242297,0.00001202208,0.00014508129,0.000033957105,0.00047507233,0.000034644196,0.000066461806,0.0000073266474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021064738,0.000020419673,0.9255781,0.0000014236606,0.000096894364,0.000018331697,0.043988418,0.006909203,0.00002544757,0.0016390701,0.0049702334,0.0167314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088712864,0.0000271709,0.1658905,0.000020527566,0.00017388999,0.000009938454,0.15720564,0.6010537,0.00004920903,0.004304636,0.07001727,0.00036037684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91092217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99946904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7596876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005063322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072302547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18041486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992835986","doi":"","title":"S-Curve Dynamics of Trade: Evidence from US- Canada Commodity Trade","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Issues Journal Articles","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Balance of trade; Depreciation (economics); Commodity; Current account; Currency; International economics; Demand curve; Bilateral trade; Economic integration; International trade; Monetary economics; Exchange rate; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.030339861191797386,"score_gpt":0.23678545302227105,"score_spread":0.20644559183047367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992835986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97949845,0.0026914028,0.0005822509,0.0149186915,0.0005261007,0.000098002194,0.00056428934,0.000013943487,0.0011068879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980592,0.0005534944,0.0006675196,0.00041095653,0.00021185206,0.0000011803012,0.000013535028,0.000014137103,0.00006810926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980623,0.00005731136,0.0011630104,0.00031555217,0.000057940135,0.0003438991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985631,0.00019354044,0.00066780555,0.00037260557,0.000013024349,0.00018993982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008898314,0.00019309839,0.0005871029,0.000087524815,0.00014443338,0.00011830412,0.00043837278,0.00008027518,0.0009107004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013024709,0.00021735566,0.00016049927,0.00008084,0.000069992915,0.0004743138,0.000035207904,0.0002984006,0.000017577468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120438766,0.00016323637,0.95710224,0.000018606454,0.00013729729,0.00002259215,0.0008194055,0.0008939716,0.000071523405,0.02349812,0.0071987575,0.009953813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038462458,0.00009833061,0.5989017,0.000043998098,0.000012176555,0.000015224302,0.00011220299,0.27270615,0.00023960443,0.121785745,0.005423551,0.00027671905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13685618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27422678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35820055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066395046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013044373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99715304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}