{"meta":{"query_hash":"dadad0f55162","filters":{"venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy"},"cohort_total":28,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"exported":28,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dadad0f55162","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Economic+Papers+A+journal+of+applied+economics+and+policy"},"results":[{"id":"W1545048164","doi":"10.1111/j.1759-3441.2012.00179.x","title":"Applying SDAC 2009 to the OECD Integration Scenario for Disability Employment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Population ageing; Demographic economics; Population; Current Population Survey; Working population; Older people; Economics; Demography; Gerontology; Medicine; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.0925775853040235,"score_gpt":0.3760493294004552,"score_spread":0.2834717440964317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545048164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82626337,0.00060268893,0.018171357,0.0054696114,0.00054314086,0.0008598979,0.043096308,0.00041966827,0.10457395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97048116,0.000343761,0.00900556,0.0005599313,0.000043188134,0.0004149152,0.0133531345,0.000071097646,0.0057273265],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.996249,0.002055953,0.00014849557,0.00029272446,0.0006655395,0.00058835186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966889,0.0010040117,0.0003560882,0.00030302716,0.0014165728,0.00023140978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056787217,0.00052665826,0.0007253233,0.0017305813,0.00076734874,0.0026002305,0.0012675269,0.0010920152,0.0030275153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010660172,0.00037360325,0.0015010672,0.0025118662,0.0005240064,0.0015630204,0.0015805878,0.0020762782,0.0007828373],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001239003,0.000549847,0.1737632,0.0003981337,0.0006068484,0.0016560209,0.00085143495,0.6636364,0.00039209504,0.08200713,0.043741304,0.031158637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002889485,0.0006256788,0.21511668,0.00028364742,0.00026490938,0.000583966,0.004399464,0.6821837,0.0012874658,0.031388592,0.06330648,0.0002704707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30913463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17024347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30913463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008713629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035689725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6146705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560317458","doi":"10.1111/j.1759-3441.2011.00140.x","title":"Who Feels Economically Threatened by Temporary Foreign Workers? Evidence from the Construction Industry*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic shortage; Work (physics); Immigration; Labour economics; Business; Minimum wage; Threatened species; Perception; Wage; Economics; Political science; Engineering; Law; Government (linguistics); Psychology","score_opus":0.02400156635680858,"score_gpt":0.25079515114701406,"score_spread":0.22679358479020548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560317458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98452395,0.002176712,0.000039377435,0.0044227713,0.000058201244,0.000029852365,0.00014084372,8.973454e-7,0.008607326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929069,0.0033695528,0.00006023938,0.0020909254,0.000055314515,0.00004376406,0.000108056054,0.000003706736,0.0013615418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670607,0.0017224301,0.00014078263,0.00018700946,0.0005113089,0.00073248206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98232955,0.008840286,0.004547136,0.0006705187,0.0019998366,0.0016126441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005974052,0.0002883504,0.0004631498,0.0013805407,0.0035278325,0.0029836642,0.0012413209,0.0020032446,0.008480847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017589733,0.00050648773,0.00051562017,0.0016318508,0.0033958165,0.0016379568,0.002317943,0.002353271,0.00087391253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000443434,0.0008953505,0.8653281,0.0006426277,0.0001576988,0.00092858047,0.09712406,0.00003323878,0.000109775836,0.0014629416,0.007627722,0.025246467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049559345,0.00029002439,0.5684919,0.0010813985,0.00009516978,0.0004915794,0.41934735,0.0000633502,0.000048427235,0.00038531117,0.009623391,0.00003254719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07581687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13630888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07581687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018793644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030512244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15075111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580138326","doi":"10.1111/j.1759-3441.2012.00177.x","title":"The Dynamics of Environmental Giving in Canada: Evidence of Rising Demand for Environmental Quality?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental quality; Quality (philosophy); Probit model; Ordered probit; Probit; Public economics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Economics; Multivariate probit model; Estimation; Demographic economics; Econometrics; Political science","score_opus":0.03642777643215233,"score_gpt":0.22649906037077616,"score_spread":0.19007128393862383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580138326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884978,0.0012387948,0.00016870262,0.0043412256,0.000014484421,0.000019256679,0.0020833453,0.000013118433,0.0036233421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99712014,0.00060333754,0.00013874858,0.0002120576,0.000005522446,0.00000483343,0.0006691235,0.00000456464,0.0012417781],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986879,0.000120016375,0.000054529824,0.00013989928,0.00047453592,0.0005231238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99209434,0.00086433475,0.0020374716,0.00028999642,0.002842018,0.0018717317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012328823,0.00019269931,0.00047045137,0.0017142049,0.0028019117,0.0024057077,0.001446051,0.000862572,0.003969043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005642872,0.00028795065,0.0004809535,0.0065632886,0.001607713,0.00087404746,0.0012887359,0.001501978,0.00024364599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017557832,0.00009951967,0.9656603,0.00007944561,0.00007223981,0.00019540478,0.0060615204,0.00061997847,0.0002911439,0.0015300849,0.0036018947,0.021612925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054024044,0.000013229424,0.99246925,0.000026276452,0.000012404804,0.000032126063,0.0041412925,0.00062589167,0.0000571209,0.00012847879,0.002471727,0.000016883103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99715096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038656484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038656484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03762683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28047377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591415473","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12103","title":"A Panel Data Analysis of the Demand for Electricity in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Per capita; Electricity; Economics; Panel data; Econometrics; Consumption (sociology); Error correction model; Ordinary least squares; Real gross domestic product; Gross domestic product; Causality (physics); Panel analysis; Agricultural economics; Cointegration; Macroeconomics; Engineering; Demography","score_opus":0.03417252970726182,"score_gpt":0.21518969510528368,"score_spread":0.18101716539802187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591415473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94139963,0.00051642,0.000883485,0.00088760373,0.000026986056,0.00005967566,0.04911632,0.000052759246,0.0070571606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.947515,0.0006361232,0.0011461213,0.00013167028,0.000014021341,0.000037962323,0.042812545,0.00001409727,0.0076925196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995834,0.00003927804,0.000015219578,0.00005608817,0.00016618344,0.00013968755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985876,0.00023224231,0.00015444579,0.00006482483,0.0007940732,0.00016681936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003726313,0.00026802043,0.00040009603,0.0014858581,0.0013241721,0.001046493,0.00056114065,0.00035106993,0.0044361567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015637759,0.00023999235,0.0006996821,0.0055322703,0.00028246894,0.000258741,0.0004277136,0.0007400894,0.0004852347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034468182,0.0003114808,0.88030994,0.00015029871,0.0005407205,0.0008514295,0.0011678687,0.040784102,0.001543455,0.005358703,0.038616076,0.03002131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028232413,0.000041661817,0.95180976,0.00003326839,0.0001117615,0.00007526647,0.0019440269,0.031617332,0.000558689,0.0003885211,0.01333238,0.00005899204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018023077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018023077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018845377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13076717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1803015754","doi":"10.1111/j.1759-3441.2011.00144.x","title":"Micro‐credit and Micro‐equity: The David and the Goliath of Micro‐enterprise Financing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Microfinance and Financial Inclusion","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Finance; Business; Nature versus nurture; Shareholder; Micro-enterprise; Economics; Corporate governance; Economic growth","score_opus":0.013292012483649107,"score_gpt":0.22752235682293936,"score_spread":0.21423034433929025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1803015754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14889279,0.05021706,0.087220065,0.19210318,0.0014630154,0.00015207818,0.00028322818,0.00010801549,0.51956064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95997787,0.009527683,0.0030882899,0.0036622414,0.0010989392,0.000083943174,0.000024383467,0.000017195045,0.022519346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991406,0.000380556,0.000022147278,0.0000792373,0.00017000311,0.0002074352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954118,0.0028237104,0.00082063844,0.00022517401,0.0002532992,0.000465285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014020009,0.00036057335,0.000479795,0.0013402591,0.0015388252,0.006675391,0.0008834936,0.0026694755,0.009716879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067383894,0.00022727315,0.0003967217,0.0015744915,0.009493194,0.007283139,0.0040962705,0.0028038758,0.0005449428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012130162,0.000007748436,0.0010181835,0.000022267355,0.0000029559394,0.000041260428,0.0001953034,0.00035514514,0.00002487443,0.9916345,0.002143014,0.004542564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021354805,0.00003720769,0.0022955637,0.000260837,0.000012363104,0.00015024531,0.0008152178,0.0032319468,0.00019880329,0.94154114,0.051421337,0.000014059114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004180485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042235362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009716879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033652883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019143141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032506168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1833985519","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12112","title":"Aboriginal Fringe Finance Use and Financial Capabilities: Survey Evidence from a Canadian City","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Finance; Exploratory analysis; Exploratory research; Population; Business; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.026635282183587072,"score_gpt":0.2363048646905094,"score_spread":0.20966958250692233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1833985519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99425536,0.00055190164,0.00008514588,0.0003047148,0.0000074087543,0.00003919313,0.0014598669,0.0000041476355,0.0032922854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615294,0.0012157281,0.00021987679,0.00017863091,0.000004936873,0.000039658546,0.001093814,0.000006081707,0.0010882553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898726,0.000121904755,0.00004891917,0.00012141815,0.00034259498,0.0003778845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996234,0.00033101553,0.0005785652,0.00016509167,0.0019827718,0.0007085079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011830769,0.00039078246,0.0005473783,0.0031923812,0.007664725,0.0020051962,0.0013532934,0.0004015664,0.0025151789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003548835,0.00043607637,0.0005031396,0.008618456,0.0014201367,0.00065205665,0.0018032548,0.00092289085,0.00036047437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006111325,0.000063681866,0.9546863,0.0001561947,0.00006207068,0.00021814961,0.032816164,0.00007295558,0.0002334757,0.00029105804,0.0018326049,0.009506169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036578533,0.000019854233,0.9700875,0.00009127026,0.00003009128,0.00005976489,0.02758332,0.0000772459,0.00005166137,0.000029351106,0.0019502256,0.000016007563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99834204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018448722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018448722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024606837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13385552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978434123","doi":"10.1111/j.1759-3441.2004.tb00990.x","title":"GOVERNANCE AND FINANCIAL FRAGILITY","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Corporate governance; Fragility; Financial fragility; Economics; Monetary economics; Investment (military); Econometrics; Macroeconomics; Finance; Financial crisis; Political science","score_opus":0.006208237959089821,"score_gpt":0.18350345760448142,"score_spread":0.1772952196453916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978434123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99578446,0.0005439222,0.00039798033,0.0003043931,0.0000050558856,0.000010214465,0.00063621975,0.000012418757,0.0023052949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944,0.00009400282,0.00004416088,0.00001717734,0.000007069083,0.0000028629827,0.00030052426,0.0000010187049,0.00009312455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941635,0.00014180217,0.00007562371,0.00007983024,0.00010225548,0.00018412166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789777,0.0032202504,0.01502516,0.00068320276,0.0006237037,0.0014700068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010445516,0.0002095128,0.00027042115,0.0019253605,0.00041464623,0.0010989603,0.00021684075,0.00047541293,0.0033871892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075311996,0.00014928123,0.00028181824,0.0020583058,0.000659208,0.0009838922,0.0013033139,0.000833494,0.00029206675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036167112,0.000027683096,0.9936293,0.000013461666,0.000072728806,0.0000629524,0.00016058637,0.0009709384,0.00008454909,0.0008593433,0.0002959339,0.00378635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005706234,0.000040513205,0.9957761,0.000021447218,0.000020619194,0.0001593999,0.00023144402,0.0010627698,0.0001163838,0.0015595277,0.0009969908,0.000009062039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026431987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037927814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033871892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050717103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026176244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01133126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978621340","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12029","title":"Public Redistribution and Inequality in a Period of Fiscal Consolidation: A Decomposition Analysis for Canada in the 1980s and 1990s","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"International Development Research Centre; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Consolidation (business); Economics; Inequality; Redistribution (election); Economic inequality; Redistribution of income and wealth; Fiscal policy; Income distribution; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Macroeconomics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.022301897400172875,"score_gpt":0.22861248972746087,"score_spread":0.206310592327288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978621340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98995167,0.00075589685,0.00017353208,0.0009347138,0.000010264726,0.000040283536,0.004243858,0.000013471822,0.0038762824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927504,0.0005645012,0.00021670532,0.000079066864,0.000009386749,0.000019687886,0.0044875285,0.000008152922,0.0018645861],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990164,0.0000337448,0.000019483297,0.00006327277,0.00018836725,0.00067863555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850214,0.00010284818,0.0002590826,0.00004030859,0.00063129654,0.00046428674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008215435,0.0004039195,0.0007592135,0.005098904,0.0038114062,0.0029863932,0.0008965523,0.00060224504,0.0031853907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024588855,0.0003195696,0.0008709507,0.009180268,0.0013018375,0.00066377735,0.001978594,0.0012301133,0.00020852868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004186565,0.00020034834,0.9421858,0.00009712024,0.00018791248,0.0004526575,0.005341856,0.0047764,0.000597873,0.0102792075,0.0089437915,0.026518382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014177026,0.000018139453,0.985655,0.000059582406,0.000047255893,0.000031043382,0.005921672,0.0037737107,0.00014136017,0.00037468493,0.0039439807,0.000019291514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99583495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9427074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057292555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052324824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4156885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987539210","doi":"10.1111/j.1759-3441.2001.tb00982.x","title":"MINIMUM WAGES AND THE FALLACY OF THE INFLATED DENOMINATOR","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Government (linguistics); Fallacy; Management; Industrial relations; Small business; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009333131320025423,"score_gpt":0.2660995760338301,"score_spread":0.25676644471380466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987539210","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17175587,0.008582734,0.57653004,0.08815803,0.0024231924,0.00006478528,0.0008856631,0.0007697703,0.1508299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9374244,0.0012848189,0.041992843,0.0033864642,0.001427079,0.00009724754,0.00026045274,0.0003644198,0.013762205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97036237,0.014754577,0.0017917375,0.0052584284,0.0061696093,0.0016633333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87984985,0.08569088,0.010169068,0.016239172,0.0071108895,0.00094021193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02490029,0.0006261357,0.0027007523,0.0027679314,0.0022124925,0.007430201,0.003436142,0.004001241,0.009493942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26715946,0.00084148534,0.00083170924,0.0030463284,0.007834311,0.00960511,0.0039891717,0.00997347,0.0020302113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015940578,0.000031213396,0.002388467,0.00008669329,0.000036402547,0.00011404556,0.0007272686,0.003167955,0.00020275828,0.9439332,0.0065795607,0.04257293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025979047,0.000020557094,0.00126575,0.000066784036,0.000010593385,0.0001330865,0.000110168134,0.005019876,0.00014051748,0.9888679,0.0043226066,0.000016224869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003131336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015974735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02490029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030766989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016637928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13168687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012530673","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12003","title":"Does Multiculturalism Pay? Empirical Evidence from the <scp>United States</scp> and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Multiculturalism; Per capita; Cultural diversity; Gross domestic product; Ordinary least squares; Linguistic diversity; Empirical evidence; Economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Development economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Demography; Econometrics; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02780776720913107,"score_gpt":0.27297662276729806,"score_spread":0.24516885555816698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012530673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97628605,0.00261935,0.00005368812,0.00453663,0.000022766651,0.0000140787415,0.00057330495,0.0000030266763,0.015891057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756795,0.0011460679,0.000035315265,0.00030599226,0.000010976443,0.000003848529,0.00024843495,0.0000028657146,0.0006786019],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982426,0.00031717392,0.000052514355,0.00016099964,0.00056449155,0.00066224363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98631775,0.0038986183,0.0024455483,0.0004852758,0.0037955209,0.0030572766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019499497,0.00018972807,0.0004909961,0.00171639,0.004285737,0.0030928883,0.00088548166,0.0006858341,0.0044320184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009734008,0.00021713928,0.00043403803,0.0036446655,0.002663346,0.00079351885,0.0018857537,0.0012975786,0.00019337038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019505415,0.0001387211,0.95912796,0.00010193702,0.00020656199,0.00036001252,0.005642644,0.0005199619,0.000093124414,0.006091511,0.00585575,0.021666752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022837661,0.000017687322,0.9800495,0.0001656688,0.00011207863,0.00006181046,0.0126692355,0.00047421586,0.00006957428,0.00075587776,0.0055850153,0.000016532798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97328305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98343766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026716948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016740222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019012904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121459365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035692078","doi":"10.1111/j.1759-3441.2006.tb00410.x","title":"NEW ZEALAND LESSONS FOR AUSTRALIAN WORKPLACE REFORM: A CRITIQUE OF 151 ACADEMICS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"New Zealand Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Productivity; Unemployment; Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Work (physics); Inequality; Inflation (cosmology); Population; Political science; Australian population; Public administration; Relation (database); Demographic economics; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Sociology; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.023030976430404217,"score_gpt":0.26138805455926617,"score_spread":0.23835707812886195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035692078","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036282758,0.016225455,0.0003671071,0.9414103,0.0021597708,0.000025501171,0.00003167162,0.0000131194065,0.03613882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24494559,0.03808598,0.0029232264,0.6297395,0.0072874418,0.0003892897,0.00007814068,0.0001349429,0.076415814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9622787,0.0124326255,0.002430315,0.0028372698,0.01578839,0.004232768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687358,0.013438159,0.0022399717,0.0014508652,0.009948492,0.0041867467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049483076,0.00081851677,0.0014756416,0.0045226556,0.014814067,0.0154300565,0.0055725425,0.017283525,0.008013268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07471207,0.00088477787,0.0013978867,0.006442011,0.03089947,0.011308534,0.012320476,0.025665853,0.001251057],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000679256,0.00012487522,0.0014051478,0.0008981357,0.000036738777,0.0005138858,0.0449057,0.00033131184,0.00017757031,0.60095024,0.28696927,0.063619286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058101636,0.000053789216,0.004974481,0.0013459988,0.000041140902,0.00012796735,0.015350321,0.00025094318,0.00012782817,0.06409436,0.91350514,0.00007001961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39287114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36835718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39287114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059328403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09199967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78116876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090680095","doi":"10.1111/j.1759-3441.2007.tb00430.x","title":"WHY IT IS IMPORTANT TO HAVE A KIND DAUGHTER‐IN‐LAW IN JAPAN: LONG‐TERM CARE FOR THE ELDERLY IN JAPAN AND AUSTRALIA","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Long-term care insurance; Work (physics); Daughter; Scarcity; Social insurance; Economic growth; Term (time); Elderly care; Long-term care; Political science; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Medicine; Nursing; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.016676233241852266,"score_gpt":0.29949522789346905,"score_spread":0.2828189946516168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090680095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95780426,0.0020863442,0.00008202484,0.033345837,0.0002215949,0.000019917596,0.000026942671,0.0000039629813,0.006409084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98551404,0.00286327,0.00019827968,0.006209583,0.000067043286,0.000022960487,0.000023382481,0.000007003468,0.0050943834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915314,0.0002371037,0.00005180068,0.00006876469,0.00012716178,0.00036197877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657416,0.0001528429,0.00056273927,0.00006230099,0.0005484775,0.0020995059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015208335,0.00014885636,0.00030040264,0.00035517747,0.0056762802,0.0020327943,0.00059911,0.0011399492,0.002873024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004027058,0.00035324963,0.00025507231,0.0005282888,0.0017770859,0.003053887,0.0029632568,0.0024669303,0.0002997375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017191861,0.0004915572,0.48194122,0.00038862112,0.00006120166,0.004231943,0.403065,0.00006714972,0.0020007717,0.0061673196,0.025248924,0.07616441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030917887,0.0002586138,0.43344265,0.0005018816,0.000060731927,0.0013747799,0.49675104,0.00014710778,0.000296385,0.00095047295,0.06612545,0.00006001808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.131612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28349185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.131612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035098486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071885795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26169187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095149464","doi":"10.1111/j.1759-3441.2005.tb00994.x","title":"AN EMPIRICAL NOTE ON THE COMPARATIVE MACROECONOMIC EFFECTS OF THE GST IN AUSTRALIA, CANADA AND NEW ZEALAND","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Neutrality; Balance (ability); Goods and services; Current account; Macroeconomics; Revenue; Yield (engineering); Multitude; Empirical evidence; Tax revenue; Balance of trade; Public economics; International economics; Monetary economics; Economy; Accounting","score_opus":0.018555351257980687,"score_gpt":0.25334036574940394,"score_spread":0.23478501449142325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095149464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94834185,0.0038111727,0.00025351773,0.0017267917,0.000028032286,0.000028667919,0.0018699832,0.0000121202875,0.043927785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909019,0.0033453638,0.0003590559,0.0001415454,0.000028274488,0.000006765316,0.0009315991,0.000012646339,0.0042729173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993081,0.000086648084,0.000042269716,0.00006384741,0.00033443826,0.0001647189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972752,0.0006891728,0.00068264944,0.00012210014,0.0010005526,0.00023037102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094401307,0.00018090283,0.00039867364,0.0015923339,0.0010263714,0.0015571683,0.00027476466,0.00021461706,0.003177911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003766378,0.00013829232,0.0004908908,0.0048352527,0.0012325194,0.00055133505,0.00081867864,0.0007704936,0.00015815395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006622726,0.00010078349,0.90709436,0.00034041944,0.00034345817,0.00074073824,0.0034815397,0.0039633964,0.0040512052,0.014610258,0.0053683645,0.05924324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043724326,0.000024510511,0.99444216,0.0000202612,0.000060158436,0.00003859161,0.0010913506,0.00018619648,0.00030522142,0.00015964292,0.0036589005,0.000008622719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88918823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9467794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11081177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063177366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057641007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2229287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100251805","doi":"10.1111/j.1759-3441.2012.00162.x","title":"Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Trade between the United States and Canada: Evidence from 152 Industries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Exchange rate; Economics; International economics; Short run; International trade; Econometrics; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.028545447487507928,"score_gpt":0.2218861465340739,"score_spread":0.19334069904656598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100251805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99060893,0.0011895023,0.00010347142,0.00015180201,0.000003855804,0.000009390041,0.0028814946,0.0000075425346,0.0050439565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945261,0.001194478,0.00010011568,0.00004174087,0.0000041824765,0.0000038348735,0.0034324285,0.0000031559612,0.00069405924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918157,0.000057337405,0.000052518553,0.00010697276,0.00040987262,0.00019173992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643385,0.0006519847,0.0011703336,0.00020957006,0.0011682952,0.0003659054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045568496,0.0002870193,0.00039811173,0.0024670148,0.0014987955,0.0017155649,0.00042924445,0.00033032935,0.0013883283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033378366,0.00018627656,0.00042062253,0.0098263845,0.00086754194,0.00040006055,0.0007741716,0.00044369322,0.00016468955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017253609,0.000031546755,0.98274386,0.0000643733,0.000263182,0.000336457,0.001242645,0.0014581399,0.00023672459,0.0010616537,0.0010697014,0.01131921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009378756,0.000015031267,0.99487406,0.00005224419,0.000073846146,0.00009979965,0.001531755,0.00056465715,0.0001944572,0.00017650536,0.0023910834,0.000017346913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97744316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027395606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006203755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069874227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055113852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102015064","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12054","title":"Class Attendance and Academic Performance: A Panel Data Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Innovations in Educational Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Class (philosophy); Panel data; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06071514076873086,"score_gpt":0.3649206257930629,"score_spread":0.30420548502433203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102015064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987765,0.00017491986,0.00458438,0.00035757196,0.000033964847,0.00006520799,0.0051643187,0.000056679084,0.0017980018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875545,0.00011444583,0.0013405804,0.00009977631,0.000039830615,0.00009268627,0.008320809,0.000016656972,0.0024208261],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615127,0.0022394564,0.00012384893,0.00045485125,0.00042766402,0.0006028882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835775,0.009712061,0.0029417153,0.0017923911,0.0007789813,0.0011972955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056687896,0.00045390794,0.000950131,0.0014413053,0.0010680509,0.0016015344,0.0013258354,0.0014799774,0.006340456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010793891,0.0004930323,0.0017577267,0.0030084706,0.00050175935,0.0006923015,0.001225721,0.0027513234,0.0013915529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051120156,0.0010040672,0.9652569,0.000036571353,0.0014299056,0.0002463281,0.0005807774,0.011799051,0.00066086394,0.00092968834,0.0048273173,0.012717251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055767832,0.0004865825,0.9693554,0.000024490866,0.00049334276,0.00008015295,0.000855247,0.025345836,0.00039942857,0.0006879565,0.002154013,0.00006183589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06105583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05045498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06105583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010136574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096084474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12140089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132753430","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12010","title":"The Impact of Human and Social Capital on Aboriginal Employment Income in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Social capital; Demographic economics; Probit model; Economics; Ordered probit; Probit; Socioeconomics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.011028855336676947,"score_gpt":0.3212856648188937,"score_spread":0.31025680948221673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132753430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98919094,0.00079169526,0.00010899232,0.0010672598,0.000015357919,0.000017792456,0.0029348275,0.000008080414,0.005865184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686337,0.0003946274,0.00011417381,0.000040167357,0.0000050014146,0.000006504066,0.000892225,0.0000030453782,0.0016809608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876475,0.00012688746,0.000029333507,0.00008378866,0.0003344085,0.00066089147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996951,0.00038310044,0.00048703366,0.00009937405,0.0010984436,0.0009810345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010486426,0.00028540663,0.00048374484,0.0017476876,0.0035099434,0.002184859,0.0010186703,0.00032214183,0.0034917286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044453503,0.00015628235,0.0005020655,0.0041438993,0.0011158447,0.00046803732,0.001841737,0.00088100537,0.00021803865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019167812,0.00007059081,0.97048044,0.00006007545,0.00012232784,0.0002861282,0.0027625037,0.0022695179,0.000112462425,0.0031423464,0.0032270185,0.01727493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006136768,0.00001607198,0.9914649,0.00005029878,0.000032621967,0.000033750715,0.0038119457,0.001378395,0.00005740221,0.0002827859,0.0028507207,0.000014945599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99761534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03792446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03792446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04421408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27516252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135154713","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12026","title":"The Relevance of the “h‐” and “g‐” Index to Economics in the Context of A Nation‐Wide Research Evaluation Scheme: The New Zealand Case","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Relevance (law); Ranking (information retrieval); Context (archaeology); Index (typography); Journal ranking; Scheme (mathematics); Citation; Frame (networking); Actuarial science; Econometrics; Operations research; Computer science; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; Medicine; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.26799216679491544,"score_gpt":0.48934658099934286,"score_spread":0.22135441420442742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135154713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8408927,0.0021463493,0.033218797,0.013652561,0.00019322045,0.0005211597,0.0010538156,0.000068828354,0.10825262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882359,0.00040884505,0.008796863,0.00019337222,0.00008850162,0.00020290472,0.00020380768,0.000021100836,0.0018486874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9517681,0.02758052,0.004410041,0.0023197765,0.011583097,0.0023384257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8652603,0.07574777,0.02248942,0.010692039,0.022394117,0.0034162276],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06640576,0.00055157,0.0012657999,0.009989869,0.0018035921,0.007122241,0.0012967143,0.0011102781,0.001822836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20990567,0.00027197407,0.00075731275,0.015509982,0.005849453,0.0076872767,0.003874848,0.0016013958,0.0002150193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005685487,0.00022119921,0.52784616,0.0007831091,0.00048621686,0.00078106433,0.01282981,0.009527575,0.0012879048,0.28703362,0.0036722862,0.15496252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014096586,0.0007978974,0.7929104,0.00090203475,0.00042440437,0.00086200325,0.0198857,0.035172306,0.002393085,0.10514705,0.041048136,0.00031611323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05032417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04264976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99001014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070688743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067728586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3511914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137242558","doi":"10.1111/j.1759-3441.2001.tb00296.x","title":"THE NEW INTERNATIONAL MACROECONOMICS: SOME POLICY IMPLICATIONS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Macroeconomics; Economics; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.02274574214290537,"score_gpt":0.23732277639709795,"score_spread":0.21457703425419258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137242558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010353447,0.07094762,0.004878201,0.7918024,0.014242625,0.000017451324,0.00046370472,0.000070927905,0.10722366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58703107,0.1399649,0.007122482,0.122034386,0.08829327,0.00018153462,0.00046383598,0.0001937739,0.0547147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891245,0.0004321802,0.00005246237,0.00020906582,0.00025152127,0.00014230983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965096,0.0018217753,0.000362187,0.0003407485,0.0006079825,0.00035772924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003194754,0.00090392947,0.0010449687,0.0019908017,0.0019003539,0.00910527,0.0012412322,0.008827056,0.013820726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010030035,0.000408283,0.00090382266,0.0034513038,0.006788492,0.014564747,0.0021410466,0.008387058,0.0014153685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009160766,0.00005318176,0.00084532774,0.00011106335,0.000024020464,0.00025030354,0.0002183234,0.0014093035,0.00009619858,0.9131104,0.06221039,0.02157981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049536022,0.00001642269,0.0018026934,0.00017801968,0.00001835189,0.00017927958,0.00041343353,0.0010884511,0.00006140179,0.8755015,0.120659076,0.000031873064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004527286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005403539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013820726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040417844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017392683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046234965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227822771","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12123","title":"Citation‐Capture Rates for Economics Journals: Do they Differ from Other Disciplines and Does it Matter?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Proxy (statistics); Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; CITES; Multidisciplinary approach; Social Sciences Citation Index; Citation impact; Hard and soft science; Impact factor; Social science; Positive economics; Economics; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Statistics; Mathematics; Information retrieval; Science Citation Index; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.24200280402426164,"score_gpt":0.4826729206852766,"score_spread":0.24067011666101498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227822771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564664,0.015829975,0.0040832274,0.0041052364,0.00023639105,0.00007887389,0.0021806723,0.00018439077,0.016834905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996181,0.0014334276,0.00042654303,0.00031296498,0.00022393088,0.000021968794,0.0007409856,0.000049566403,0.00060962857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869518,0.0042255446,0.0016505042,0.001951774,0.0039529377,0.0012675073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79511935,0.116731286,0.053396013,0.01552239,0.015155556,0.0040753842],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023446187,0.00039147038,0.0013642495,0.012173512,0.00079984614,0.005154762,0.0014011413,0.0015996782,0.002925107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17820846,0.00028097662,0.0013009822,0.0128652975,0.0018425628,0.0049643978,0.0021253566,0.0013448725,0.0017317606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030979133,0.00008201751,0.94496536,0.00033000179,0.001201891,0.000083229774,0.0019476727,0.0005655564,0.00081755786,0.003993905,0.0017407743,0.043962162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014343317,0.00011304316,0.99192387,0.00008157816,0.00024046907,0.00024962894,0.0007855362,0.00064271875,0.0007899252,0.0025357779,0.0025827147,0.00004043996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00394244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029640673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98782647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014126234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009730694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123996794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326785417","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12133","title":"Pricing of Regional Airline Services in Australia and New Zealand, 2011–2015","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Business; Industrial organization; Economics","score_opus":0.0287705288983107,"score_gpt":0.2503782815418238,"score_spread":0.2216077526435131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326785417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99465793,0.00031126704,0.00028094553,0.00014529741,0.000006445526,0.00001805847,0.0029279594,0.000016894133,0.0016351854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929993,0.00024551732,0.00025636505,0.00004082912,0.000010239269,0.00001526993,0.0041312496,0.000009564959,0.0022916794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939716,0.00005892232,0.000061352075,0.00016918847,0.00019796913,0.000115330746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981384,0.00018788305,0.00096935296,0.00008165187,0.00042543042,0.00019727416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007066958,0.0003954805,0.0004476042,0.0011498684,0.00030444836,0.0014109456,0.0006957929,0.0003936917,0.0019352223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003122093,0.00031442236,0.000812614,0.0020507385,0.00053519616,0.0014249336,0.00092298497,0.00084631494,0.00043335298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022836511,0.00017499644,0.95277053,0.00018176911,0.00047021543,0.00053179846,0.0016515491,0.01921667,0.0011857086,0.0013880288,0.0057698735,0.016430596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000594375,0.000048289756,0.98749465,0.000014849225,0.000052522864,0.00009529655,0.0006859092,0.008852286,0.00017673145,0.00007169234,0.0024842233,0.000017583076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5099364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46118084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5099364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039193723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011705573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9858994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332030767","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12134","title":"Dissatisfaction with Working Time and Workers' Training Opportunities. Evidence from Matched Employer–Employee Data","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Restructuring; Appeal; Training (meteorology); Test (biology); Work (physics); Demographic economics; Labour economics; Business; Differential (mechanical device); Economics; Political science; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.26245209636915556,"score_gpt":0.36428495967055086,"score_spread":0.1018328633013953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332030767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99709296,0.00022940384,0.00010378254,0.00012919186,0.0000065739937,0.000011366613,0.0016165163,0.0000028842949,0.000807314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971083,0.00013419692,0.00007429216,0.00007237779,0.000009456951,0.00001743811,0.001901502,0.000001841307,0.00068064826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971614,0.00087278633,0.00030487793,0.00038495407,0.00088037824,0.00039562763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624059,0.011023087,0.019069107,0.001930748,0.0022065127,0.0033645493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004365204,0.00019973198,0.00043890977,0.0014806011,0.00077273365,0.0011017675,0.00070793,0.0007593315,0.0035642073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014772883,0.00029371117,0.0006479415,0.0022947688,0.0006201344,0.00050234294,0.0008941406,0.0007032298,0.0006877184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045687917,0.000038825972,0.9981845,0.000009183571,0.00006667921,0.00001147155,0.00014844193,0.000050213595,0.000020900625,0.000024989045,0.00017759921,0.0012215294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016497756,0.000013579974,0.999645,0.0000037773466,0.0000076158663,0.0000057765105,0.0001345282,0.00006376267,0.000010651921,0.000006998276,0.000105278064,0.0000013955527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11067043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12702774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11067043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006718151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007926558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22005254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588458987","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12169","title":"Can Macroeconomic Variables Explain Managed Fund Returns? The Australian Case","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Explanatory power; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Closed-end fund; Variables; Econometrics; Regression analysis; Monetary economics; Geography; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.030930342223600853,"score_gpt":0.24058336371261424,"score_spread":0.20965302148901338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588458987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941199,0.0010001854,0.0002771366,0.0018331584,0.000012204946,0.000008937729,0.00021603024,0.0000070870883,0.0025253869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984438,0.0004765046,0.000095344236,0.000062480285,0.000018767643,0.0000058895394,0.00013577497,0.000002021907,0.0007593415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930096,0.00021938802,0.000047074962,0.0000856553,0.0001334015,0.0002135211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529016,0.001527885,0.00203362,0.0002628241,0.0004735309,0.00041198108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001835769,0.0003692906,0.0005904726,0.0022189347,0.0006055289,0.0017801963,0.0006699143,0.00073106604,0.0016245331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012111426,0.00024074773,0.00068800163,0.003137877,0.000648937,0.0016685439,0.0015099326,0.0013252086,0.00023766723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000196358,0.00013883175,0.957378,0.000079962694,0.00025988236,0.0015772348,0.0018639471,0.004865289,0.00037603444,0.007054678,0.001121411,0.025088407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009275095,0.000055784792,0.984213,0.000053038224,0.00011817111,0.0001381265,0.00090425723,0.009799486,0.00015701193,0.0026964075,0.0018403955,0.000015075251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11011802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06955581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11011802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017920518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012358163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21895415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609048329","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12177","title":"The Relationship between Intergenerational Educational Mobility and Public Spending: Evidence from Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Public spending; Social mobility; Demographic economics; Daughter; Educational attainment; Public education; Inequality; Economics; Robustness (evolution); Sociology; Economic growth; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.10605854381786217,"score_gpt":0.35492801163774923,"score_spread":0.24886946781988706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609048329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671134,0.0054458412,0.00025697667,0.0026959768,0.000025532663,0.00002522115,0.013784176,0.000021140631,0.010631867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922483,0.0029605546,0.00016303554,0.00011652902,0.000008575778,0.00000846393,0.003188357,0.0000079495185,0.0012981665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988123,0.00013475344,0.00006111512,0.00014318105,0.0003755086,0.00047315654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943929,0.00091223145,0.0013650795,0.00026716475,0.0021199705,0.0009425946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010008691,0.000249914,0.00046089623,0.0027053826,0.0026576007,0.0016880512,0.0010610179,0.0003636055,0.0034952676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045765634,0.0002364014,0.00064580736,0.009160403,0.0009519772,0.00053622754,0.0014781646,0.00085349655,0.00018883364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009696197,0.000032142143,0.97864425,0.00009708948,0.00017717878,0.00014714309,0.0015896485,0.00053166895,0.00005335887,0.0016335206,0.0036171663,0.013379835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052195196,0.000006084396,0.9953681,0.00008904934,0.000047221325,0.000030318986,0.0013497646,0.0002789811,0.00003623341,0.00008674768,0.0026910033,0.000011303769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99741733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99851054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027549237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027549237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029505217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19988465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003774474","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12275","title":"Fractional Integration and the Persistence of UK Inflation, 1210–2016","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Inflation (cosmology); Econometrics; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sample (material); Mean reversion; Degree (music); Perspective (graphical); Keynesian economics; Mathematics; History; Physics","score_opus":0.032785021588941074,"score_gpt":0.20666035207374933,"score_spread":0.17387533048480824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003774474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98489714,0.002568684,0.0035401233,0.0012098374,0.000105442654,0.0000052717405,0.001877147,0.00002859988,0.0057677864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745387,0.00048172037,0.00022144656,0.000026355738,0.000029662384,0.0000031889028,0.00095985265,0.000008314259,0.0008155457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927276,0.00012396846,0.00013836529,0.00015305624,0.00019520895,0.0001165686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632406,0.0010632969,0.0014799946,0.0003863296,0.000616618,0.00012967005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016531282,0.0001673804,0.00031407425,0.0011846625,0.00037395922,0.0017271783,0.00020993012,0.0004422096,0.0014776757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013765386,0.00014258895,0.00032229206,0.0021196513,0.0006433848,0.0014429464,0.0012906878,0.0008074343,0.00038513524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000986558,0.00006618085,0.73676336,0.00047440597,0.00040437822,0.0013917056,0.008455958,0.02810454,0.00196813,0.046727195,0.0070172627,0.16764025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014405565,0.00007748866,0.9450615,0.00024469206,0.000072707204,0.00044366744,0.0013877023,0.019813076,0.0011786782,0.011623256,0.020019757,0.000063162486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020493364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01452387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020493364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013830938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053917064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04074812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281763903","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12358","title":"Exploring First Nation Community Well‐being in Canada: The Impact of Geographic and Financial Factors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"First nation; Indigenous; Revenue; Government (linguistics); Census; Geography; Public policy; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Finance; Sociology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.04498713794451957,"score_gpt":0.25862548463172225,"score_spread":0.21363834668720266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281763903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99228704,0.0006266322,0.00013515374,0.0007945501,0.000010694237,0.000027437805,0.0010949154,0.000005324177,0.0050183074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980293,0.0004172193,0.00016291329,0.000061137245,0.0000022693805,0.000009890811,0.00047031493,0.000002170505,0.00084481196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916756,0.00008804319,0.000017606691,0.00006422252,0.00024209259,0.00042044258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978509,0.0002252733,0.00027099208,0.00005902864,0.0007649828,0.0008288357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010729408,0.0003162258,0.00043281238,0.0021777826,0.005159207,0.0019305135,0.00078486267,0.0002591407,0.002250943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025928926,0.0001617889,0.0005885095,0.004626175,0.0012800675,0.0005449906,0.0016074529,0.0009157709,0.0001205811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005803314,0.00007291409,0.9715147,0.000056652592,0.00006609194,0.00015554605,0.0058955154,0.00041807856,0.00016708628,0.0013767487,0.0015836075,0.018635005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001723295,0.000016875565,0.98688346,0.000050062154,0.000016952246,0.00002527227,0.0107639255,0.00033801448,0.000062067025,0.00014765942,0.0016803348,0.000013737412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99841356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02666005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02666005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045942858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1934331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316467688","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12377","title":"Effect of<scp>COVID</scp>‐19 Lockdown on the Profitability of Firms in India*","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Profitability index; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Quarter (Canadian coin); Revenue; Business; Financial statement; Robustness (evolution); Monetary economics; Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Finance; Accounting; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.017886291692313476,"score_gpt":0.259153845017875,"score_spread":0.2412675533255615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316467688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99655545,0.00013852434,0.000057622427,0.00033048415,0.000011328072,0.0000058435444,0.00095755607,0.000023548182,0.0019198337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987356,0.00005525354,0.000017271639,0.000054053693,0.000009851638,0.0000025761124,0.0006355509,0.0000017819993,0.0004879702],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994789,0.00006056655,0.000041675,0.00006618744,0.00009891937,0.00025374972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943626,0.0009431994,0.003148392,0.00022072825,0.00041398493,0.0009111639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046504458,0.00014182659,0.00016942853,0.00072075974,0.00033896993,0.0013105808,0.0005189219,0.0004432495,0.0037524784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002872267,0.000106049374,0.00043341226,0.0008372727,0.0006309881,0.0004626296,0.0010995509,0.0010854169,0.0003882709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018662956,0.000093497445,0.98683804,0.00003898929,0.00007183001,0.0005760774,0.0001973797,0.0019110001,0.0007202121,0.0005670374,0.0021057972,0.00669348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004821285,0.000103053164,0.9968748,0.000009316156,0.000020227564,0.00010574105,0.0005257633,0.0008377739,0.00043820424,0.00007100032,0.000999543,0.000009765064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05088084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041716874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05088084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012106149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009257905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10116941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411885474","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12438","title":"Effective Rates of Protection in an Industrialising, Settler Economy: Estimates for Victoria (Australia) in 1880*","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Economy; Political science","score_opus":0.03263433610525762,"score_gpt":0.33619595663538276,"score_spread":0.30356162053012514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411885474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910644,0.0004610475,0.00045757016,0.00008410628,0.0000023484306,0.000005836863,0.0008966631,0.0000047718886,0.0070231957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947707,0.00040165943,0.00041479224,0.000010284098,0.0000034346904,0.0000044047147,0.00090292137,0.0000034842071,0.0034883583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974614,0.0000340358,0.000020836762,0.000028864053,0.00009567915,0.00007442437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993426,0.0000758225,0.0002462358,0.000039934468,0.00019925214,0.000096023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004264533,0.00010538977,0.00014304911,0.0015632862,0.00028402847,0.0006846348,0.00025716968,0.00018327445,0.0010630772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015024865,0.00017768973,0.0002694784,0.0013703579,0.00048027755,0.00046236574,0.0006325988,0.000433125,0.0001857103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011532433,0.000038432187,0.8729473,0.00022256245,0.00018752346,0.00060424994,0.008161452,0.01335918,0.002050006,0.04111757,0.0034174214,0.057778876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002281026,0.000018610242,0.9858424,0.00003345725,0.000012514992,0.00015401024,0.00057959015,0.0026633942,0.00017453477,0.0009560539,0.009552632,0.000010451921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20236246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28886864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20236246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034830603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007813251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4023692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124944185","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.70005","title":"The Role of Work Experience Programmes in Shaping Employment Outcomes for Indigenous Peoples in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Papers A journal of applied economics and policy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Workforce; Human capital; Work (physics); Internship; Work experience","score_opus":0.008752849442099293,"score_gpt":0.27673198256049514,"score_spread":0.26797913311839583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124944185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858688,0.0010360779,0.00020285313,0.0020181262,0.000038355676,0.000050079598,0.0007470365,0.000008389422,0.010030397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978727,0.00045548394,0.00013392967,0.0001492225,0.000005403752,0.000013063624,0.00016064005,0.000004151795,0.0012054894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998245,0.0002100962,0.000041141524,0.00011791332,0.00038368185,0.0010021838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974591,0.00023367268,0.00027505733,0.00007294769,0.0006836752,0.0012755888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015112781,0.00023257636,0.00039820722,0.0009715771,0.0053898413,0.0021947506,0.0009943419,0.0003560893,0.0029887608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004429091,0.00013929722,0.00043224648,0.0019796924,0.0017069044,0.0007119526,0.0024640264,0.0012400829,0.000174812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019137099,0.00024540204,0.8962266,0.00021586586,0.00011700572,0.00029605345,0.022903318,0.0006383619,0.00035355825,0.002596933,0.003154177,0.073061354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007002209,0.000036104782,0.9742819,0.00019551594,0.000027230328,0.000029721337,0.020954106,0.00023129514,0.000058088866,0.0003353563,0.0038221122,0.000021456939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98595273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023781234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023781234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06075685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17254573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}