{"meta":{"query_hash":"73d542e785a9","filters":{"venue":"Economics and Philosophy"},"cohort_total":31,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":31,"exported":31,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/73d542e785a9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Economics+and+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1963707627","doi":"10.1017/s0266267101000165","title":"The tables turned: Wilt Chamberlain versus Robert Nozick on rectification","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Framing (construction); Democratization; Politics; Expropriation; Expansive; Indigenous; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Democracy; History","score_opus":0.06187151736698653,"score_gpt":0.30420085211900433,"score_spread":0.2423293347520178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963707627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10238032,0.00032553083,0.0000046818195,0.13183858,0.0011026096,0.00016352478,0.000015729838,0.00003848056,0.76413053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905382,0.00560306,0.000022676548,0.0012949902,0.0017475077,0.000012446836,0.000007098903,0.00001128899,0.00076274195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991137,0.000101527214,0.00017560014,0.00022741655,0.000082874794,0.00029889643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987523,0.0007584824,0.00006893228,0.00022055075,0.000034633766,0.00016510428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007016011,0.00010676177,0.000112414076,0.000032509855,0.0012130871,0.0001607034,0.00018464055,0.00013660543,0.00003600581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021454766,0.000089463974,0.000052630756,0.00008137312,0.00046582014,0.00015448521,0.000028272385,0.00020873513,0.000097511234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110333494,0.000021368665,0.000060805938,0.0000016768721,0.000014418808,6.1816985e-7,0.0007902746,0.000020883243,0.0000015011611,0.995249,0.00041155287,0.0033176225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017644392,0.00004854987,0.000108551736,0.0000048747347,0.000005067917,4.8173234e-7,0.000116041694,0.00006633483,0.000009382515,0.5681536,0.43122268,0.00008796369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071118865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009832883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88815784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108475724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008571705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9330208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038610752","doi":"10.1017/s0266267108001673","title":"RATIONALITY OF BELIEFS AND MODEL CONSISTENCY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Rationality; Variety (cybernetics); Abandonment (legal); Epistemology; Positive economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.058277855276992946,"score_gpt":0.20052970706686685,"score_spread":0.1422518517898739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038610752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92000294,0.0031267216,0.0006472813,0.001582955,0.00011931117,0.000121861376,0.00043178318,0.000011212683,0.073955946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933068,0.0045197764,0.0014469592,0.00033275748,0.00010075312,0.00000771717,0.000010917383,0.000014904608,0.0002593997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989755,0.0000047554668,0.000555396,0.0003230708,0.0000075861262,0.00013364662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993725,0.000041672894,0.00026674563,0.00021426399,0.000017355034,0.00008750255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022415776,0.00012586387,0.0003950625,0.00008291852,0.00013551132,0.000016183134,0.00008269915,0.000075842145,0.000044976357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001584768,0.000156473,0.000066150955,0.000025018118,0.00026744913,0.0002016143,0.00006907927,0.000064576736,0.00001628006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012666464,0.000024987794,0.009245397,0.000018289129,0.000036521076,3.2584592e-7,0.00036981617,0.00068557897,0.0000030403605,0.9894583,0.0000616735,0.00008339096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046900057,0.00003846563,0.0031636532,0.000004279389,0.0000037442803,0.00001370422,0.000008938909,0.023127722,0.000027808275,0.97041166,0.0025484862,0.00018252892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056103454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000052309447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073696546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019914425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002749668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6380784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096624227","doi":"10.1017/s0266267104001294","title":"CRITICAL NOTICE TOO MUCH INVESTED TO QUIT","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coase theorem; Tort; Notice; Liability; Transaction cost; Law; Economics; Social cost; Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Incentive; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04224492396447365,"score_gpt":0.2296779656402668,"score_spread":0.18743304167579314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096624227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70070595,0.0011444947,0.0006974262,0.028367668,0.002385077,0.0004827837,0.0004198705,0.00008454152,0.2657122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99041677,0.00036438496,0.0009427606,0.0067198,0.0013186248,0.000036869747,0.000016266318,0.00005720882,0.00012733784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773794,0.000012429804,0.00097368186,0.00077271316,0.000020323163,0.00048290953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987427,0.00008350349,0.00021768802,0.0004615673,0.000036466143,0.00045808931],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049290457,0.00024399374,0.00069834973,0.0002517229,0.00023266995,0.0002849456,0.00030621758,0.00020303513,0.00012703348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015731314,0.0003714246,0.00014527899,0.00012471898,0.0002151825,0.00047113674,0.00014363408,0.00017086566,0.002070365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021424843,0.000065315406,0.0030671174,0.000030346031,0.00004362596,0.0000033642568,0.00052048016,0.00028605582,0.0000049407286,0.9954331,0.00036279717,0.00016141964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081180676,0.00016008841,0.0016770867,0.000021008229,0.000008057576,0.000012534737,0.00004631805,0.00021777119,0.000058263937,0.93790525,0.058568444,0.00051338895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007085322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012314625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28971082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022301766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046931593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102531573","doi":"10.1017/s026626711300028x","title":"MEASURING GROUP FITNESS IN A BIOLOGICAL HIERARCHY: AN AXIOMATIC SOCIAL CHOICE APPROACH","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Hierarchy; Multicellular organism; Axiomatic system; Group (periodic table); Mathematical economics; Soma; Social choice theory; Inclusive fitness; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology; Biology; Economics; Genetics","score_opus":0.08556689064692381,"score_gpt":0.2648938256307335,"score_spread":0.1793269349838097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102531573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639171,0.00006547473,0.000041175874,0.0016188633,0.000057918507,0.00019766149,0.0000027709107,0.000022201395,0.03407683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881494,0.00008402298,0.00019357991,0.00021633455,0.0005873458,0.00005370113,0.000015692525,0.00000494572,0.000029439696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992627,0.00020876674,0.0001474229,0.00018633918,0.00003551717,0.00015925865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997611,0.00005503815,0.000039668932,0.000059578244,0.000016406846,0.00006820623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045517433,0.00007265098,0.00012029857,0.00004989371,0.00039209973,0.00008612415,0.000117697076,0.00009074224,0.00006352627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023373208,0.00007132171,0.000023817554,0.000071092225,0.0001920099,0.00046994578,0.000025461128,0.00008175414,0.00002025577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008303491,0.00007897073,0.004008039,0.0000057704824,0.0000048353354,1.5842984e-7,0.0034869264,0.000047819794,0.000037655034,0.98913676,0.0000062312674,0.003178514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035280958,0.00006228373,0.04969253,0.000005882419,0.0000028561285,0.0000010118451,0.0008153608,0.0040170285,0.000003059573,0.94345474,0.001383946,0.000208519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004011658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019516824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04568449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005003943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002565908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30157536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117383245","doi":"10.1017/s0266267105000763","title":"RESPONSE TO MY CRITICS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018982778554916886,"score_gpt":0.264160881752706,"score_spread":0.24517810319778913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117383245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4383227,0.000040227464,0.000021138867,0.05364075,0.00017111567,0.000074169744,0.00001806435,0.000019723375,0.5076921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934949,0.000048315767,0.00030263976,0.004325251,0.0007080546,0.0000064308983,0.0000014897469,0.000005826526,0.0011070864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944496,0.000047191643,0.00012315123,0.00014973483,0.00002107981,0.00021386663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995446,0.00015944979,0.00001692672,0.00009116015,0.000014197292,0.00017367434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039653518,0.000057758578,0.00009339664,0.00004384291,0.00022605046,0.00007427471,0.00008504429,0.000054601813,0.000061645456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064712054,0.0000677938,0.00002923491,0.000029763069,0.00013385643,0.000100790705,0.000031670494,0.000041764448,0.00012124624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002805884,0.0000122427,0.0001715706,0.0000011104905,0.000002036271,9.363009e-7,0.000260251,0.000007660786,0.0000046553723,0.9980089,0.00077230076,0.0007302899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006879919,0.000015884514,0.000764446,0.0000015303657,0.0000014780904,3.0713443e-7,0.00003287148,0.000009550402,0.000015009881,0.48133144,0.5176966,0.00006209512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005813031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028871285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5551722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046464636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063064894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27645507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122262289","doi":"10.1017/s0266267102001050","title":"Symposium on <i>Marshall's Tendencies</i>: 4 Comments on <i>Marshall's Tendencies</i>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Positive economics; Point (geometry); Epistemology; Key (lock); Sociology; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04380071766258705,"score_gpt":0.21115142919054736,"score_spread":0.1673507115279603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122262289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.309112,0.0009747958,0.000007609914,0.018462393,0.0012460194,0.0003784797,0.00096276385,0.00008896288,0.668767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709543,0.004910035,0.000073905445,0.019107793,0.0010674894,0.0000529944,0.000044212313,0.0000935901,0.0036956933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971541,0.00004438245,0.001019159,0.0010661586,0.000030248542,0.00068595604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790627,0.00024338861,0.00054914266,0.00091836276,0.000020117053,0.00036270896],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000598123,0.0005503185,0.0008254151,0.00041429183,0.00039506317,0.000235878,0.00058698375,0.00029988118,0.0013974762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004137865,0.00064875354,0.00028130072,0.00013059942,0.00021469727,0.00040920076,0.00016870102,0.00047483237,0.005050512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006810414,0.0002914076,0.0023596587,0.000030772262,0.00012321032,0.0000066691273,0.0004923908,0.00023778979,0.000008190393,0.9882955,0.007307187,0.00077911466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015244563,0.00057102245,0.0005774425,0.000044608925,0.0000137578345,0.000023232751,0.00003504601,0.0016936508,0.00010749402,0.62769234,0.36684674,0.0008701671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007810501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017801047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66507125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021375966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001381095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134084267","doi":"10.1017/s0266267104210513","title":"<i>Adam Smith's Marketplace of Life</i>, by James R. Otteson. Cambridge University Press, 2002, 352 pages","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adam smith; Art history; Philosophy; Art; Economics; Classical economics","score_opus":0.012413603380588162,"score_gpt":0.1988343024067326,"score_spread":0.18642069902614444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134084267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094463065,0.0026067349,0.000011913922,0.025702447,0.0001301067,0.00014720963,0.00025767044,0.000029225957,0.87665164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97570336,0.013230452,0.00017322047,0.0014318824,0.00051613216,0.0000014374624,0.000005302816,0.000009855081,0.008928381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923754,0.00006982789,0.00017480835,0.00022431527,0.00003806908,0.00025542857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931145,0.00016713359,0.000102556696,0.00013742699,0.000021304313,0.0002601475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028134356,0.00010628924,0.00021424088,0.000029666915,0.00020123679,0.00003736112,0.0001929879,0.00010449077,0.0000747763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042293956,0.00012562728,0.00006291922,0.00003193693,0.00035203167,0.00032809086,0.00006852084,0.000091627364,0.000018353086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041579526,0.000062363404,0.00075066776,0.000017854236,0.00004190591,6.4351156e-7,0.0002115256,0.000009204377,0.000003612545,0.82489437,0.17036629,0.0035999685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003369373,0.000022172611,0.00042974547,0.000006954045,0.000013323583,3.1316293e-7,0.00013100237,0.00010758605,0.00006666667,0.002185868,0.99654734,0.00015206405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010177874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007264429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88124025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059647853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011708365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51229316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147167812","doi":"10.1017/s0266267100210298","title":"<i>Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment</i>, Charles L. Griswold, Jr. Cambridge University Press, 1999, xiv + 412 pages.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Media studies; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012378333337468031,"score_gpt":0.19089714550553527,"score_spread":0.17851881216806725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147167812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3712482,0.0026971207,0.0000027637889,0.015747795,0.00009605417,0.0002227417,0.00009931939,0.000017671176,0.60986835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407377,0.05568332,0.0000336584,0.0005686955,0.00027259006,0.0000020718007,0.000002693443,0.000005575398,0.0026936624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933976,0.000085427026,0.00014972205,0.00019713593,0.000037589507,0.00019036728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949574,0.0001548093,0.00006962232,0.00013401578,0.00001115305,0.00013463768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033177165,0.000096597294,0.00020952203,0.000019811301,0.00032506362,0.000048149097,0.000163925,0.000071012335,0.00004992055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010337513,0.000081909435,0.00005666734,0.00002474305,0.0009415373,0.00022140358,0.000055451328,0.00008078937,0.000008769824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006365039,0.000024713534,0.0002447957,0.000009644904,0.000033717028,0.0000012037896,0.00056536065,0.0000015387852,8.193382e-7,0.9911629,0.0010335203,0.0068581607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000911081,0.000024758328,0.0007663379,0.000010533879,0.000030731728,0.0000010994659,0.00021852354,0.000105291816,0.000055530574,0.042401515,0.9553355,0.0001391223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019504398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000102772465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95430195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026271844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005004682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34691334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158686382","doi":"10.1017/s0266267105000684","title":"WHEN ALTRUISM LOWERS TOTAL WELFARE","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Argument (complex analysis); Utilitarianism; Welfare; Economics; Microeconomics; Social Welfare; Simple (philosophy); Social preferences; Positive economics; Welfare economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023681603951752696,"score_gpt":0.2546771878313872,"score_spread":0.2309955838796345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158686382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15253006,0.00016748552,0.000005929255,0.12589979,0.00043786393,0.00009379226,0.00004055372,0.000043794535,0.72078073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581933,0.00012357789,0.00013005092,0.0012354206,0.0021161498,0.0000045760476,0.000010129857,0.000011535839,0.0005492581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918026,0.000043446784,0.00017839955,0.00022218825,0.000068757494,0.00030696284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954474,0.00007682394,0.000046864952,0.00012880912,0.000024279969,0.00017849194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026198526,0.000107513595,0.0001449745,0.00004432298,0.00056986173,0.00009796384,0.00012329908,0.00015445532,0.00016982811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028100902,0.00011767474,0.000069065005,0.00003449133,0.00044034643,0.0001914155,0.000040257717,0.00015814055,0.000063400206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062905997,0.00002167289,0.00029825847,0.000005084968,0.000007139158,0.0000017377885,0.00057081855,0.000015725236,8.7560034e-7,0.99832237,0.00040962728,0.00034038728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013522265,0.000017618051,0.0005912968,0.0000034796226,0.0000059022154,0.0000010859605,0.0000661786,0.000031078453,0.0000051260763,0.7983781,0.2006336,0.00013127654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020086565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020866291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84328926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056116176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057762772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47986367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167539968","doi":"10.1017/s0266267109990010","title":"EXTERNAL NORMS AND RATIONALITY OF CHOICE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalizability; Axiom; Rationality; Mathematical economics; Norm (philosophy); Preference theory; Preference; Economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12191257713421992,"score_gpt":0.37260557742137373,"score_spread":0.2506930002871538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167539968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904203,0.00020859428,0.00010341265,0.0020775567,0.0001592393,0.00005444652,0.000033902234,0.000005205128,0.00693739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822193,0.00015869868,0.00084933697,0.000541083,0.0001634442,7.5846845e-7,0.0000014936076,0.000003503296,0.000059729184],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989796,0.000020497835,0.0005029524,0.00031192336,0.00009346421,0.00009153806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990156,0.0003379122,0.00023321577,0.00025994296,0.000058975274,0.00009434704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007007386,0.00009415842,0.0002497912,0.00010313429,0.000078847654,0.00015730612,0.00020314261,0.000054162185,0.000076034376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013880285,0.00007615769,0.00005699369,0.00005763293,0.00008798268,0.0002901905,0.000056648023,0.000062610656,0.000021877928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054156037,0.000089230336,0.04558359,0.0000022101513,0.0000073948377,0.000001356703,0.00013704176,0.0001827484,0.000118331875,0.21391387,0.00022158501,0.73968846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023154567,0.00007865661,0.10000983,0.00000568588,0.0000039425004,0.000006957764,0.0000071711456,0.00094434916,0.000058445043,0.89151824,0.0070467936,0.00008841243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012901711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000066200987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73960006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011077208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022495764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31056204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169003194","doi":"10.1017/s0266267110000180","title":"ALTRUISM AS A THICK CONCEPT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Normative; Component (thermodynamics); Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015798499972402492,"score_gpt":0.2931270549221222,"score_spread":0.2773285549497197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169003194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43857804,0.000044892477,0.0000020376237,0.039847415,0.0010031608,0.00006581034,0.0000058605647,0.000024265639,0.52042854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916637,0.0011259594,0.000110365,0.0048092133,0.0009080306,0.0000049431683,0.0000025170962,0.000005409239,0.0013698929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996278,0.000017772465,0.00009243469,0.00011960523,0.000030750132,0.00011163313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965394,0.00006744477,0.000040810763,0.000092129274,0.0000222243,0.00012346552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013429332,0.000051959694,0.0000750662,0.000017388498,0.00039766138,0.000099807854,0.00009046859,0.00009567103,0.00048971473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033130418,0.000054651016,0.000057857178,0.000026882208,0.00022620634,0.00011863089,0.0000166041,0.00018547584,0.00019109609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015499159,0.000009379249,0.00018746997,5.022683e-7,0.000007950047,2.6605977e-7,0.0067769536,0.0000010426808,0.000019316334,0.9894174,0.0029031571,0.00067505153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007918878,0.000009680285,0.00007980028,0.00000116162,0.0000022370475,0.000001481707,0.00049212435,0.000027157708,0.00001905635,0.36635262,0.6328768,0.00005868131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093541207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003347382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62997365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012574537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007114046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53620327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246360977","doi":"10.1017/s0266267114000297","title":"ETHICS, EQUITY AND THE ECONOMICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE PAPER 1: SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science; York University","keywords":"Climate change; Equity (law); Climate science; Positive economics; Action (physics); Scale (ratio); Economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Social science; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.049803279565181734,"score_gpt":0.24839194951931845,"score_spread":0.1985886699541367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246360977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9261426,0.0003652432,0.0000040944747,0.02127418,0.00015980989,0.0002353093,0.00003977596,0.000011915089,0.051767115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822182,0.01486676,0.00010366121,0.0025712564,0.00021048995,0.000012923992,0.0000019149174,0.000011903559,0.000002892837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914443,0.000021659027,0.00020527218,0.0003281163,0.00006412069,0.00023641635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938303,0.00015490092,0.00010438165,0.00023122063,0.000009730075,0.000116713025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015525798,0.00013983923,0.00022169156,0.00003994604,0.00027205228,0.000079502206,0.00019522029,0.00006738572,0.000038604798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048146547,0.00011246907,0.000027353173,0.00005728922,0.0014014416,0.00037221436,0.0010950506,0.00014286232,0.000010397358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088358735,0.000030027286,0.009040855,0.00014838838,0.000016896012,3.8919987e-7,0.0035666432,0.00019045771,0.00020615988,0.9477999,0.000015376138,0.038896546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016185966,0.0001556208,0.016394868,0.000045549175,0.000032930573,0.000016495918,0.00006833291,0.02736019,0.00017817892,0.9407114,0.012995981,0.0004218761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011059633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007583736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05607564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033609205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006009622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.516367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252712698","doi":"10.1017/s0266267115000292","title":"INCENTIVE INEQUALITIES AND FREEDOM OF OCCUPATIONAL CHOICE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Inequality; Incentive; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Freedom of choice; Economics; Sociology; Public economics; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1558599991300363,"score_gpt":0.348985586269799,"score_spread":0.1931255871397627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252712698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.782248,0.00037141232,0.000013699242,0.00973464,0.00025174502,0.00008587719,0.000116478244,0.000012463949,0.20716566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984137,0.00023754528,0.00014388887,0.00046854868,0.00067059725,0.0000022882537,0.0000055945916,0.0000038119445,0.000054064407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949014,0.000059168007,0.00015155732,0.00011533656,0.00006530336,0.00011849198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993627,0.00026581125,0.00006182249,0.00006138936,0.000069499154,0.00017874126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039505496,0.0000595322,0.00012570687,0.000036916128,0.00012220292,0.000029290826,0.00006813471,0.00007885717,0.000010486705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022772394,0.000062668536,0.00002049025,0.00003238587,0.00067521323,0.0001888361,0.00004754241,0.00007620587,0.000003911636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019973739,0.00001391138,0.006562656,0.000008496297,0.0000101291,1.1801945e-7,0.004369103,0.000007280151,4.1165964e-7,0.9888407,0.000056707966,0.00011048792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002477439,0.000038687067,0.002960456,0.000007765551,0.0000059965455,1.8705224e-7,0.00047924247,0.0000839021,0.0000065538843,0.976077,0.020012336,0.00008008854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012729538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018617255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21616563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026137423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013871271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25555488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592044354","doi":"10.1017/s0266267116000286","title":"THE FITTING-ATTITUDE ANALYSIS OF VALUE RELATIONS AND THE PREFERENCES VS. VALUE JUDGEMENTS OBJECTION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Parity (physics); Preference relation; Mathematical economics; Relation (database); Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.03503583966933008,"score_gpt":0.24876655152414617,"score_spread":0.2137307118548161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592044354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6597296,0.0006308912,0.0000080222635,0.033889227,0.0005112922,0.00022154328,0.00009189602,0.000011922491,0.3049056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975867,0.0014910814,0.0000087571325,0.00033217215,0.00034991946,0.000012280026,0.000006636935,0.0000064925707,0.00020591808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993444,0.00007116107,0.0002583837,0.00017185257,0.00005616464,0.00009805434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987976,0.0004507145,0.0003113745,0.00035241182,0.000050938917,0.000036939626],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007964338,0.000099133,0.0002207895,0.000059751525,0.0024112286,0.00045817898,0.00023245472,0.00004546389,0.0000468714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010106274,0.00005808576,0.00010697462,0.000015932388,0.0014570896,0.00016263193,0.00012797774,0.00015442887,0.0000040048076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004693357,0.000013398954,0.0007178826,0.0000061030482,0.0005503643,5.8112008e-8,0.0023012417,0.00010554908,2.8621676e-7,0.9957252,0.000011011283,0.00052195124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036153392,0.000033112046,0.0058725993,0.000010116039,0.00034211058,1.7345569e-7,0.00008641142,0.0057533532,0.0000025043455,0.97982293,0.007638422,0.00007675647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034668873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047105816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33785713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008037819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017502238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794346961","doi":"10.1017/s0266267117000347","title":"WHY SHOULD WE TEAM REASON?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Prisoner's dilemma; Dilemma; Team composition; Psychology; Rational planning model; Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Management; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04029536365689707,"score_gpt":0.2828671052166818,"score_spread":0.24257174155978473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794346961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28680336,0.0004565743,0.000050013743,0.04671158,0.0004378679,0.0001160119,0.000010590731,0.000042720287,0.6653713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99307936,0.0015245702,0.00010978691,0.0024967266,0.001990756,0.000004517992,0.0000034807265,0.000005380468,0.0007853949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995843,0.00005439469,0.00008539803,0.00013770137,0.000029516745,0.0001086688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975055,0.000032403666,0.000029273364,0.00008788238,0.000029078468,0.00007080236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000281211,0.000053981406,0.00006709936,0.000025861817,0.00056601805,0.000052593903,0.000081722465,0.000058202222,0.00028846302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017539802,0.00005600164,0.000021523883,0.000042152024,0.00030563519,0.00020834326,0.000020776988,0.000045733465,0.00011068507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015624015,0.0000133166395,0.0002804489,0.0000012937444,0.000005784844,1.3178864e-7,0.0020717476,0.0000040683353,0.0000064191645,0.99047595,0.0038047363,0.0033204523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006392329,0.000040915114,0.00008267203,0.000003856601,0.000002704596,6.0407115e-7,0.00011954269,0.00015953042,0.000018601764,0.4614747,0.5379727,0.00006027208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013078708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004408546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70627606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027856353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042645835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43534103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944930411","doi":"10.1017/s0266267119000129","title":"Exit versus voice – options for socially responsible investment in collective pension plans","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"State Capitalism and Financial Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Divestment; Pension; Investment (military); Democracy; Control (management); Business; Economics; Law and economics; Finance; Political science; Law; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.032642807809253056,"score_gpt":0.22534497504644263,"score_spread":0.19270216723718958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944930411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9172204,0.00013875528,0.0000084840085,0.003232424,0.00082539127,0.00049747207,0.00008478179,0.000014898706,0.07797739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937246,0.0005858714,0.00045769897,0.0031514287,0.0011847267,0.00007368351,0.000079915255,0.00003190139,0.0007102155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994452,0.0000033367846,0.00015180487,0.00022490899,0.000029219655,0.00014554961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966705,0.00007439321,0.00011559001,0.000099575904,0.00003386869,0.000009547468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013405501,0.00010084422,0.00015624172,0.00015565018,0.0000973843,0.00008611563,0.00007453447,0.000054098877,0.00001812488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031564574,0.00011276645,0.00004199835,0.00013523559,0.000026006504,0.00039143165,0.000058289894,0.000050879316,0.00009309762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006022583,0.00002855829,0.0018425166,0.000031821888,0.000010228795,9.087162e-7,0.0001085429,0.000111782814,0.000030860385,0.9953244,0.0017988649,0.00010925551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031639023,0.0000711856,0.023173228,0.000028617445,0.000016318038,2.5825236e-7,0.00009895631,0.0024151267,0.00001564993,0.81994087,0.1508167,0.00025919607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015443964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052611023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17538354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054873428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008518273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45984825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961760608","doi":"10.1017/s0266267119000130","title":"The epistemic division of labour in markets: knowledge, global trade and the preconditions of morally responsible agency","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung; Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Division of labour; Precondition; Electronic markets; Economics; Business; Law and economics; Market economy; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.02129133734129332,"score_gpt":0.2915247490260627,"score_spread":0.27023341168476933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961760608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.809204,0.0013121144,8.1730633e-7,0.039216205,0.00015336937,0.0002285444,0.00011729049,0.0000037533052,0.14976394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708176,0.0025078,0.000017849248,0.00015058921,0.000076719036,0.000005331409,0.0000013471331,0.0000037052323,0.00015492292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907607,0.00029288785,0.00028867502,0.00013388076,0.0000514339,0.00015706698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985527,0.0010967264,0.000108685395,0.00015905508,0.000022188658,0.000060651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014354025,0.000071116774,0.00018761322,0.000027340027,0.00021247548,0.000028727278,0.00018620267,0.0000903877,0.00001758327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016551476,0.000049082577,0.000053760432,0.00009838539,0.0009711495,0.00010858178,0.000061983905,0.00012454567,0.000004242564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009420324,0.000024593384,0.0029921778,0.000030647843,0.00001177292,9.205503e-8,0.0017804687,0.000005831677,0.0000033925571,0.9944376,0.000015622767,0.0006035945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005196284,0.000032296313,0.042077426,0.000033580847,0.000005714598,4.3213282e-7,0.00017654583,0.000106316904,0.000008336284,0.95356584,0.0034182612,0.00005565156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022976947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004010227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18787777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003188778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015596644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35782406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986984163","doi":"10.1017/s0266267119000312","title":"Exit versus voice – options for socially responsible investment in collective pension plans – CORRIGENDUM","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Content (measure theory); Investment (military); Actuarial science; Business; Law and economics; Public relations; Economics; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05113840740451734,"score_gpt":0.247853006245258,"score_spread":0.19671459884074066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986984163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10474912,0.0027122623,0.000015069219,0.010329751,0.08855139,0.0064176326,0.0016143526,0.00019314348,0.78541726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09478613,0.02178718,0.0054558204,0.037505437,0.10291597,0.0022087279,0.045326144,0.0016636989,0.6883509],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808323,0.000023324745,0.00059671496,0.00077475194,0.00012892167,0.00039305817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986355,0.00014166374,0.00061950437,0.00037650892,0.00019854425,0.000028309716],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044705204,0.00044980718,0.0007547065,0.001291102,0.00036325265,0.00034111642,0.0002805203,0.00043517532,0.000105504376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013058813,0.0005097045,0.00025504048,0.0004951559,0.00007543079,0.0005702596,0.00024991808,0.00037279277,0.00024173358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011859846,0.00011366273,0.003250255,0.00030700493,0.00009281604,0.000005656384,0.00012011115,0.00014396489,0.000005792719,0.3561796,0.6385384,0.00005670421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001921194,0.00008638385,0.0038829239,0.00016770342,0.00023625791,2.9868136e-7,0.000038973743,0.006938042,0.0000015257822,0.19758154,0.78852135,0.0006238228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005199714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049147955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15859807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028789698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065158214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110795639","doi":"10.1017/s0266267120000383","title":"Inductive risk in macroeconomics: Natural Rate Theory, monetary policy, and the Great Canadian Slump","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Economics; Monetary policy; Proximate and ultimate causation; Natural (archaeology); Macroeconomics; Keynesian economics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.030740119169887125,"score_gpt":0.19402289328947764,"score_spread":0.16328277411959052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110795639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9340033,0.0037540405,0.000009583021,0.038347885,0.00025977998,0.000433124,0.00088016404,0.000015764293,0.022296341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816796,0.0062428266,0.00007453761,0.010989074,0.00082532514,0.000022813918,0.000028322918,0.00004039472,0.00009708714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979577,0.000092109796,0.0007349642,0.00067949493,0.0000087149365,0.0005270334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986754,0.00023851916,0.0003652842,0.0002847875,0.000005287672,0.00043068573],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009914365,0.00033021843,0.00072941167,0.00035154272,0.00025691657,0.00019462027,0.0002788129,0.00015008518,0.00013718985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015022059,0.00032428632,0.00013057946,0.0001146897,0.00040353392,0.00046067213,0.00012581045,0.0004608175,0.00023746952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038443855,0.000010374799,0.060321532,0.000018891675,0.00021882726,0.0000052330197,0.003093,0.0012338462,4.1176312e-7,0.93200856,0.00021715714,0.002487695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028939112,0.00006462436,0.040965535,0.000006125342,0.000015368018,0.0000131112265,0.000099370925,0.066876955,0.000003997727,0.8654237,0.023148531,0.00048880326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11657175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014524732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10204701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018980113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006474761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133052046","doi":"10.1017/s0266267120000449","title":"What do climate change winners owe, and to whom?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; HEC Montréal","funders":"Princeton University","keywords":"Externality; Beneficiary; Economics; Polluter pays principle; Appeal; Climate justice; Climate change; Economic Justice; Microeconomics; Compensation (psychology); Public economics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.02668430812153569,"score_gpt":0.2157245340826116,"score_spread":0.18904022596107592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133052046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860214,0.001038316,0.0000015032934,0.0077106506,0.00027342065,0.00008225915,0.000021195829,0.000011223147,0.004840048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714053,0.02494562,0.00020185667,0.0030766525,0.00028096163,0.000017237768,0.000011293457,0.000015810625,0.000045223318],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994658,0.000004577806,0.00008826301,0.00024680098,0.000022757995,0.00017179201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997162,0.000013144362,0.000018122217,0.00012306341,0.0000021582707,0.00012728947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006471681,0.000091379836,0.000107711145,0.000018829363,0.00008250321,0.00018348935,0.00004352695,0.00003198655,0.0002649901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000026959672,0.000097930206,0.000019208916,0.000047762605,0.000034804216,0.00033858733,0.00024189634,0.00003909305,0.000118118944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015854582,0.00031303952,0.21824694,0.00046405624,0.00016062662,0.0002510386,0.03861265,0.0033401188,0.0052520526,0.08572332,0.0036226944,0.6438549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018839248,0.00035506423,0.13295744,0.0003937848,0.000066404835,0.00016630256,0.0024024136,0.006929841,0.0021337355,0.09819808,0.7524279,0.0020851537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014215116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005636041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74880517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002252263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000013071433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39934778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230946242","doi":"10.1017/s0266267110000027","title":"EAP volume 26 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Psychology; Mathematics; Physics; Engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.026568991602548435,"score_gpt":0.19846753930192712,"score_spread":0.17189854769937868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230946242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004416183,0.0065928968,0.000009806794,0.0028822264,0.010805033,0.0003108327,0.0045579625,0.000013085831,0.97041196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004190423,0.013974575,0.00023304563,0.0021655092,0.0019621144,0.000026820455,0.00013642015,0.00011184309,0.97719926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973158,0.000009484769,0.0008710017,0.0013020675,0.000018115928,0.00048347667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984469,0.00004287273,0.0006488964,0.00060239213,0.000024100058,0.00023485222],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003337741,0.00053507695,0.0012020229,0.0003229869,0.00025842377,0.0004844372,0.00034129503,0.00055803027,0.35712773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009197856,0.00065255474,0.00019292124,0.000059995375,0.00043454237,0.00034292042,0.00043773634,0.00048736154,0.85335404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014860514,0.000028741259,0.0014063413,0.000115740906,0.0001893894,7.730439e-7,0.00021019178,0.000017381466,3.6416805e-7,0.011750497,0.98613983,0.00012590142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005426384,0.000036367193,0.00031608398,0.00002441482,0.000018593593,0.000008201784,0.000020511592,0.00034743757,0.0000023005655,0.011388069,0.98654485,0.0007505183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015527653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003488929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4962263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006875913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027380263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235973201","doi":"10.1017/s0266267103001019","title":"UNDERSTANDING EGALITARIANISM","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Impossibility; Skepticism; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Positive economics; Criticism; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.14038990287203437,"score_gpt":0.21697248813357642,"score_spread":0.07658258526154205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235973201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0798301,0.0010673975,0.004645599,0.0015900257,0.0008687761,0.000129208,0.00012602194,0.000035243487,0.91170764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974708,0.0007113467,0.0005972702,0.00063594384,0.00013510196,0.000009221702,0.00000748675,0.000019314879,0.00041351156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989738,0.000013293288,0.00042576352,0.00036521323,0.00000524703,0.00021671671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943924,0.00003953542,0.00015409356,0.00024725587,0.000004452215,0.00011542689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046487764,0.00014316819,0.0002752752,0.00013527916,0.00026582347,0.00009047072,0.000102049074,0.00009073056,0.0005328299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003659133,0.00018636747,0.00008357134,0.000052186802,0.00012937037,0.00033692736,0.000025384827,0.00011033667,0.0005049303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036918034,0.000020362524,0.0020389464,0.0000059348445,0.00003351644,7.0717203e-7,0.00013122338,0.000091138776,0.0000011397991,0.9975321,0.00012687435,0.000014361644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003390232,0.00002469141,0.00013534608,0.0000036617291,0.0000027974963,0.000011174658,0.000047212576,0.00022728764,0.000016880245,0.8403536,0.1586356,0.00020270562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001633113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007253479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9176407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001336397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019339925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7599845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242963104","doi":"10.1017/s026626711400011x","title":"EAP volume 30 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.027618978276175682,"score_gpt":0.19628235391305957,"score_spread":0.16866337563688388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242963104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021788033,0.0074257497,0.00002954325,0.0022746779,0.0070541366,0.000281862,0.0036586022,0.000009006082,0.9770876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0059993304,0.013820956,0.00013761442,0.0028918963,0.0019316523,0.00002520946,0.00017769278,0.00008538978,0.9749303],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728936,0.00001434863,0.0008977428,0.0013020161,0.00001812401,0.0004783792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846286,0.00004894963,0.0006722195,0.00057306525,0.000022019716,0.00022091813],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038204415,0.00053134875,0.0013004661,0.00029543607,0.00023754533,0.00044020498,0.00031794104,0.00039735946,0.40674078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008912191,0.0006480099,0.00018755866,0.000051769064,0.00036169682,0.00026247487,0.00040908958,0.00027918458,0.89162475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001126971,0.000021640075,0.001199555,0.0001507666,0.00020084053,4.705312e-7,0.00017491807,0.00004955985,7.1322205e-8,0.01547555,0.98259956,0.00011578301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058084296,0.000047008176,0.0002605322,0.000034795725,0.00001936004,0.0000051634615,0.000017633445,0.0007833754,9.0726326e-7,0.011377165,0.9861247,0.0007485033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011449509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.0083296e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48488396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008984642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020210726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246116815","doi":"10.1017/s0266267115000127","title":"TRACTABLE FALSIFIABILITY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Falsifiability; Karl popper; Mathematical economics; Epistemology; Proof of concept; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12810873918427843,"score_gpt":0.28139623875640785,"score_spread":0.15328749957212942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246116815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87204146,0.000077489225,0.00024694923,0.0008543272,0.00030593274,0.00012090441,0.000014984964,0.00004630127,0.12629166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788046,0.00003352841,0.0014734975,0.000120473625,0.0002887603,0.0000074506015,0.000002569256,0.000012435753,0.00018082785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995182,0.000014434231,0.00017335628,0.00015742182,0.000027498201,0.000109074936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954754,0.000059527563,0.00006034451,0.00018911483,0.000024892879,0.000118607815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029648058,0.000085076,0.00014989829,0.000025708383,0.00005205892,0.00003781715,0.000053439846,0.00006875308,0.000026626443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043643748,0.00008223835,0.00003737986,0.00002520357,0.000037072576,0.00015045282,0.000026758273,0.0000743619,0.000030426309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036900474,0.00007097204,0.00092544704,0.000027064989,0.000020639452,5.8534437e-7,0.00025505666,0.000013724659,0.000012065518,0.9937166,0.0009856729,0.003935295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003056138,0.000060216677,0.00011290069,0.0000024583123,0.0000089138575,0.0000062858485,0.000021092997,0.0010187859,0.00014662405,0.9582104,0.040005013,0.000101677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002431891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014848109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12611082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032429438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002242832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33535826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282003966","doi":"10.1017/s0266267122000062","title":"Better vaguely right than precisely wrong in effective altruism: the problem of marginalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Sympathy; Altruism (biology); Normative; Class (philosophy); Intervention (counseling); Positive economics; Scale (ratio); Economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012257461776684507,"score_gpt":0.23517947540306286,"score_spread":0.22292201362637834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282003966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9576753,0.0011764267,0.0000023733098,0.009516632,0.00019568016,0.0004905019,0.000015253943,0.000007777233,0.030920079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967267,0.0021406675,0.00021157225,0.00054603664,0.00019118334,0.0001249178,0.0000042742204,0.00000796128,0.00004670278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916774,0.00017204537,0.00019990995,0.00019592863,0.00009356962,0.00017082934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995721,0.00015088264,0.00011316895,0.000100672245,0.000017283513,0.000045911645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086075295,0.00008571556,0.00015800001,0.000043548927,0.00046918567,0.000035949466,0.00020097365,0.000040025763,0.000060272403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000039562483,0.0000719035,0.00006496553,0.00010511522,0.00016264824,0.00008104539,0.00010100656,0.00013910804,0.0000035882993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000959169,0.00017238059,0.04809282,0.00005111288,0.00014053729,0.000004931303,0.38959363,0.00039430274,0.000011590781,0.54865986,0.010196397,0.002586535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037036167,0.000060789527,0.035635564,0.000009350401,0.000008348153,0.0000012444141,0.0034201697,0.000037729875,0.000027390455,0.887008,0.0732742,0.00014683159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032066521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034002788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38617346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012535848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008462216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.484752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308801558","doi":"10.1017/s0266267122000268","title":"Revisiting variable-value population principles","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Japan Securities Scholarship Foundation; Mitsubishi Foundation","keywords":"Axiom; Property (philosophy); Sadistic personality disorder; Class (philosophy); Variable (mathematics); Limit (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Value (mathematics); Population; Focus (optics); Mathematics; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Statistics; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Demography","score_opus":0.07074229758254054,"score_gpt":0.2384464532403738,"score_spread":0.16770415565783325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308801558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5189882,0.0008160352,0.000017403438,0.005160136,0.0016897146,0.00021999641,0.00020965363,0.00006541058,0.47283348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99477863,0.0001111134,0.0003091766,0.0013575937,0.0021407052,0.000019406501,0.000096579985,0.000019196852,0.0011675741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993454,0.00006447306,0.0002275434,0.00019981412,0.000038289454,0.00012446751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958766,0.00007434458,0.00013855446,0.00014205783,0.000018852845,0.000038515736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000402523,0.000094824696,0.0001698001,0.00004915054,0.0007831106,0.00008823033,0.00008861996,0.000023812467,0.00034925208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012286022,0.00010461064,0.000048629463,0.0000127083695,0.00007962409,0.0001226146,0.00010660267,0.0001796756,0.000008942666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073373203,0.000012557486,0.00051984005,0.000028954793,0.000022171134,5.459125e-7,0.0022700639,0.00077842164,0.0000017200432,0.9955592,0.000039879327,0.000759297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012226764,0.000032189626,0.00016766743,0.00000557743,0.000014417029,0.000002959474,0.00020531744,0.0012654569,0.0000013004296,0.58059347,0.4174742,0.000115156356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019296618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001656156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4757905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034763612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019918045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6023133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378800459","doi":"10.1017/s0266267123000172","title":"Designing a just soda tax","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Simon Fraser University; Amherst College","keywords":"Paternalism; Public economics; Economics; Distributive property; Autonomy; Revenue; Point (geometry); Tax revenue; Law and economics; Welfare; Distributive justice; Tax policy; Tax reform; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.07171968387989786,"score_gpt":0.27934807107871856,"score_spread":0.2076283871988207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378800459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5211587,0.00013086914,0.000054059597,0.29872945,0.0011649258,0.0002396297,0.000017728265,0.00025055403,0.17825413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9164309,0.0004544342,0.00014424186,0.07839331,0.004295941,0.000021119089,0.000046048124,0.00002641117,0.0001876177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991929,0.0000067501223,0.00023007992,0.0002062644,0.000021674907,0.00034232961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996573,0.00005897683,0.00011015615,0.00012385804,0.000021519607,0.000028197876],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046871707,0.00010753276,0.00019165942,0.0001575683,0.00020183461,0.00011329821,0.00011006386,0.000066019886,0.000048152313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000652441,0.000105660256,0.00004220064,0.00016971861,0.00004511457,0.00032237446,0.000149789,0.00007737833,0.0008806408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007048611,0.000006531531,0.0016479503,0.00007473219,0.000012674804,0.000002194532,0.000020260914,0.0007987618,0.000004322299,0.74295545,0.25312865,0.0013414081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001606416,0.0000055075334,0.00126039,0.000005919993,0.0000052079795,0.0000011197811,0.000045461173,0.015885044,4.610241e-7,0.1990014,0.78352237,0.00010646117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010757239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024644489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5439541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000134695265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013689403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402449079","doi":"10.1017/s0266267124000166","title":"Narrowly person-affecting axiology: a reconsideration","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of St Andrews; London School of Economics and Political Science; McGill University","keywords":"Axiology; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.06650113448350334,"score_gpt":0.23606095185339657,"score_spread":0.16955981736989323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402449079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45850497,0.002737995,0.0000084802095,0.04195196,0.0019178515,0.00014327888,0.00006277556,0.0001456873,0.494527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516547,0.00029041813,0.000025001338,0.0014852337,0.0027422656,0.000009449159,0.000013406249,0.000023052698,0.00024568653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935806,0.00003601122,0.0001579753,0.0002813527,0.000024400813,0.00014221943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953413,0.00023973452,0.000033384902,0.00010398548,0.0000217967,0.00006693964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003252554,0.00012931945,0.00015671212,0.000091049675,0.00032416283,0.00039684636,0.0000549234,0.00007596433,0.00045376073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025144967,0.000117779135,0.000077663855,0.000012671472,0.00023604237,0.00022167261,0.000025174768,0.00025215262,0.00013879016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008402811,0.000008186439,0.000004926266,0.000043636537,0.000045003002,0.0000050540925,0.007658593,0.0000050636763,0.000012676076,0.9892704,0.00013270153,0.0028053462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008974374,0.00006935226,0.000004347375,0.0000399594,0.000012928977,0.000013951081,0.00022354288,0.0022209901,0.000013655118,0.9219819,0.07518065,0.00014903018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025934176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061105304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53666055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002040859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034498295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49683616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402726024","doi":"10.1017/s0266267124000233","title":"Shaping people’s preferences: liberal neutrality, means paternalism and tobacco control","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; University of Warwick","keywords":"Paternalism; Neutrality; Tobacco control; Control (management); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Medicine; Management","score_opus":0.07270232346048833,"score_gpt":0.30162809571374694,"score_spread":0.2289257722532586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402726024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8057535,0.00221686,0.000028399634,0.06600665,0.000775605,0.0002058476,0.0001466121,0.00010743701,0.124759026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938008,0.0022062247,0.000031774118,0.0022835522,0.0015154746,0.000010302987,0.000004583006,0.000013521555,0.00013376448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998957,0.0000955933,0.00022332795,0.00033103942,0.00007661133,0.00031645436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926394,0.00030088428,0.00003443868,0.000106389496,0.000022672943,0.00027166487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051693706,0.0001420375,0.00021760084,0.000058425318,0.0003784148,0.00048119965,0.00014260747,0.00016242905,0.000054181208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033250424,0.00013753353,0.00006701528,0.00005663918,0.00034415757,0.00039371656,0.00005551107,0.0002567621,0.00002375447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009393065,0.00000803083,0.0024862774,0.000038772338,0.000036430927,0.000002819338,0.007161506,0.000004824188,0.0000012469422,0.98834705,0.00004460473,0.001859033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018245996,0.000034703688,0.0015152663,0.000051416584,0.000025672149,0.0000025972922,0.0001073382,0.00051376485,0.0000025199,0.9828873,0.014492215,0.00018469976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016409185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010571169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18804725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003962623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009815163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5608455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406832815","doi":"10.1017/s0266267124000415","title":"Intergenerational and intragenerational cooperation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Positive economics","score_opus":0.014847148381915644,"score_gpt":0.19984377260538105,"score_spread":0.1849966242234654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406832815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9012375,0.00017674058,0.0017790507,0.029478274,0.00064469024,0.00012122989,0.000005011202,0.000028558701,0.06652893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325687,0.000086066226,0.00018464915,0.005214854,0.0010135171,0.000009367324,0.00012058251,0.0000042797856,0.00010981194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963397,0.0000019190788,0.00015247497,0.00014224782,0.00001582113,0.00005357187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998257,0.000007270467,0.000046052774,0.000046122048,0.000071211514,0.0000035975113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008802851,0.000071163544,0.00007129994,0.0001266207,0.00017344202,0.0002679469,0.000026649313,0.00003971607,0.00006097737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010273225,0.00007298405,0.000009769003,0.00009496886,0.00003608553,0.00068378466,0.000036805646,0.00004122635,0.000010637305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010850334,0.000010112159,0.0017129843,0.00002036926,0.000010017961,1.00616774e-7,0.0000031420507,0.00029465783,0.00016474244,0.99419767,0.001175368,0.002399963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069565733,0.000008411558,0.017631415,0.000024427152,0.00002109055,0.0000019074946,0.000008472541,0.11311918,0.00019709746,0.6922556,0.17579007,0.0002466224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015927046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021983284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30194205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000069973516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017642904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29762033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414612082","doi":"10.1017/s0266267125100515","title":"Fairness and signalling in bargaining games","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Signalling; Identity (music); Stability (learning theory); Line (geometry); Social group; Inequity aversion","score_opus":0.0313745409387773,"score_gpt":0.3025353314807412,"score_spread":0.2711607905419639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414612082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8318934,0.0015866661,0.000004008235,0.002348881,0.00010468776,0.00009156983,0.0000030724227,0.000010753608,0.16395694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968645,0.0024320881,0.00020735658,0.0003023239,0.000065325476,0.000012560294,9.044814e-7,0.00000450191,0.00011042975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994955,0.00002082808,0.00014710921,0.0001894366,0.000012950205,0.00013414999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998093,0.00006474859,0.00003330338,0.00004607608,0.000006877782,0.000039682378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021560433,0.000071867646,0.00014833889,0.000080088525,0.00021524187,0.000075684555,0.000062962565,0.000046149056,0.000008873026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010350541,0.00008605571,0.000017135133,0.000043889457,0.00018272472,0.00014141943,0.000078314224,0.000058271842,0.0000023825028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007492882,0.000013028284,0.06161239,0.0000045581332,0.000009564582,7.3886594e-7,0.004548032,0.000015472593,0.00003271681,0.92954326,0.000011930232,0.0042008045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058275275,0.000028402414,0.0064063054,0.00005602756,0.000009485067,2.930962e-7,0.0057829567,0.00038634462,0.00029082078,0.97539705,0.010796889,0.00026270046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063374155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066547125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1649711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006428226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033413755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35092503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}