{"meta":{"query_hash":"a7467a31de8d","filters":{"venue":"Edinburgh Law Review"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a7467a31de8d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Edinburgh+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1984901342","doi":"10.3366/elr.2003.7.2.273","title":"<b>François Gendron, L'INTERPRÉTATION DES CONTRATS</b> Montreal: Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2002. 225 pp (incl index). ISBN 2 89127 561 6 (hb). CA$40.","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Political and Social Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Humanities; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.036894498898736125,"score_gpt":0.3346375266086401,"score_spread":0.29774302770990396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984901342","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034289708,0.80896527,0.0014612572,0.0733585,0.0054088854,0.000031373696,0.0015621945,0.00021796946,0.10865174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022026753,0.58704305,0.002894389,0.029844042,0.0059009446,0.00016077608,0.0013541073,0.0004520719,0.3503239],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896836,0.0002167659,0.00007101995,0.00012913489,0.00043041428,0.00018437764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985341,0.0007227949,0.00016354503,0.000053348875,0.00045182894,0.0000744172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012327841,0.0017099639,0.0007084335,0.004038498,0.0040271077,0.004300905,0.0018839254,0.004952369,0.10058665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032792466,0.0011527977,0.00075838086,0.006190112,0.0023478745,0.0071598426,0.0012046827,0.0036040158,0.036391545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008266374,0.0000034399025,0.00006613619,0.00016690503,0.000004230305,0.000029379178,0.00014958203,0.00003072983,0.000024313795,0.010374672,0.9760577,0.013084706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005818418,0.0000026701712,0.0010236077,0.0003255282,0.0000051888455,0.00009542369,0.00020800611,0.000034218698,0.00005535365,0.0050983625,0.9931357,0.000010069003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33818007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.481465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33818007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008122404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006545184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67242324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009206298","doi":"10.3366/elr.2010.0304","title":"“A Strange Archaic Provision of Mercy”: The Procedural Rules for the <i>Duellum</i> under the Law of <i>Clann Duib</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Clan; Sociology; Criticism; History; Classics; Political science","score_opus":0.035471030898331035,"score_gpt":0.3424471035868621,"score_spread":0.30697607268853105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009206298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027094312,0.006961561,0.008241714,0.14963548,0.0013426144,0.000052671763,0.00011474341,0.00008025543,0.80647665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8870681,0.0017542769,0.001717299,0.011636815,0.00042427416,0.00006740352,0.000044562144,0.00012127741,0.09716606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995458,0.0023750903,0.00017753537,0.0006086205,0.00068017596,0.0007005854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976405,0.0012390574,0.00024148893,0.00026794223,0.00041657954,0.00019439151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054903156,0.00040678185,0.00030705496,0.0007238928,0.011688151,0.009844751,0.0016871144,0.006466681,0.0058542606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009593378,0.0006605699,0.00032265234,0.0007998443,0.028735053,0.007181443,0.0029793284,0.008664167,0.0009014987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007685528,0.000002924097,0.00008597445,0.000008479039,0.0000012453311,0.000049771716,0.0064746174,0.00003852955,0.000034991874,0.9766863,0.01516186,0.001447774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002460162,0.000022356346,0.0016930529,0.00042309775,0.000015895108,0.00021017963,0.013461293,0.00049500086,0.0004582303,0.47063327,0.5124999,0.000063115556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06420717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092184536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06420717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00984108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006275339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12766689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343654611","doi":"10.3366/elr.2016.0351","title":"John Cairns, <i>Codification, Transplants and History: Law Reform in Louisiana (1808) and Quebec (1866)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law reform; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.027099379417512892,"score_gpt":0.28140102567558833,"score_spread":0.25430164625807544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343654611","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064908694,0.42129555,0.00060347375,0.47186252,0.009872438,0.00008125464,0.0011539087,0.00006310569,0.08857682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1774963,0.23838282,0.0015469241,0.3200656,0.010433451,0.0002582916,0.00063548185,0.00019635516,0.25098476],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971572,0.0007666375,0.00014093342,0.0003294366,0.00095478765,0.00065099745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941969,0.0030861404,0.00028264688,0.0001285269,0.0018802279,0.00042551974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033385328,0.000786828,0.0005482367,0.002769207,0.019144889,0.009698355,0.0027845826,0.0135494545,0.008839832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009376566,0.0005949992,0.0004614211,0.005977448,0.011673479,0.005831924,0.0015644564,0.0068323626,0.0011868271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030558203,0.00003124411,0.0015866811,0.00023813067,0.000022450762,0.00010521712,0.004471728,0.00017564985,0.00007779919,0.12032858,0.8596128,0.0133191105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002901002,0.000010535459,0.0061928895,0.00074440794,0.000025081645,0.000039186296,0.00562019,0.000080128804,0.0002273489,0.0137518365,0.97322726,0.00005198842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9274641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97692716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07253587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042342078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06651804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30721474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W245496813","doi":"10.3366/elr.2007.11.2.290b","title":"Peter C Oliver, <i>The Constitution of Independence: The Development of Constitutional Theory in Australia, Canada and New Zealand</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Independence (probability theory); Law; Constitutional theory; Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03373830542968244,"score_gpt":0.31719429429644236,"score_spread":0.28345598886675993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W245496813","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062804865,0.26119265,0.0021339268,0.5284884,0.00960503,0.00012682816,0.000612177,0.000048950133,0.19151159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16309555,0.31455472,0.0036468569,0.17395826,0.005441206,0.00020490997,0.00049253204,0.00015757342,0.33844832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815816,0.00038157994,0.00008712999,0.00017857975,0.0008920613,0.0003025719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648714,0.0019422576,0.00018247745,0.000079543446,0.0010092997,0.00029941043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024896136,0.000463347,0.00035449312,0.0013883633,0.006049953,0.0042336914,0.0011530526,0.005239513,0.0068085087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009568351,0.0005817198,0.00035270213,0.0024882003,0.006233447,0.0045045833,0.0013054059,0.0060734046,0.00088978146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001807029,0.000020925332,0.0007014796,0.0002664969,0.000009401657,0.00010899069,0.00274309,0.00017772254,0.000076580814,0.31793118,0.66267353,0.015272605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020125397,0.000007940123,0.005155496,0.0005743084,0.00001804411,0.00007741526,0.0032363932,0.000105625986,0.00021325989,0.051598575,0.93896,0.00003272237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6637336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77721786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3362664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011058777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03327133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67649347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908718997","doi":"10.3366/elr.2019.0523","title":"Sense and Sensibilities: A Feminist Critique of Legal Interventions against Sexual Violence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Law reform; Sexual violence; Sociology; Battle; Action (physics); Criminology; Criminal law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.025980044774639745,"score_gpt":0.34731524723245993,"score_spread":0.3213352024578202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908718997","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012386267,0.14741789,0.008792632,0.5472275,0.002876111,0.000044613338,0.00005072826,0.000050379353,0.28115392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8560821,0.05070721,0.0023649887,0.061962347,0.003568895,0.00021261262,0.000027560767,0.00008922999,0.024985101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.960154,0.031923827,0.00057523476,0.0010989951,0.00448061,0.0017673325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766757,0.020071434,0.0009584569,0.00055949105,0.0012179993,0.0005169267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026103104,0.00086798886,0.0009366933,0.004536472,0.011776488,0.011881174,0.0040246737,0.009641999,0.003396617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025914533,0.000514442,0.0007642738,0.0024298376,0.121631294,0.010530905,0.008456175,0.009956131,0.00044570485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058223304,0.000007623733,0.00006768443,0.0001718478,0.000006155263,0.000085155094,0.025083594,0.00009232731,0.00004114946,0.96391654,0.0053521553,0.0051700966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035340323,0.000044526332,0.00063825207,0.0018577443,0.000025734817,0.00017300087,0.035633724,0.0001632634,0.0002311146,0.49904245,0.4621303,0.000024496898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023002021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023243139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026103104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016266607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014107988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13804811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921013079","doi":"10.3366/elr.2019.0571","title":"The Principle of Good Faith in Contractual Performance: A Scottish-Canadian Comparison","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Good faith; Honesty; Duty; Law; Fair dealing; Faith; Supreme court; Subject (documents); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.022953268273611438,"score_gpt":0.3342424241363495,"score_spread":0.3112891558627381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921013079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19353582,0.015809903,0.002729144,0.03698008,0.00043502738,0.00014141359,0.0005784365,0.000053289004,0.7497368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782913,0.0041925474,0.0006443791,0.0023893984,0.000051305415,0.000023320234,0.00012019079,0.000021505948,0.0142661175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831215,0.0024140044,0.00048085875,0.00074211555,0.008615303,0.0046262727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854798,0.0031515937,0.00081046525,0.0006536753,0.008484294,0.001420131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01068755,0.00041918753,0.00062228594,0.005276366,0.01991641,0.008673312,0.0021010162,0.0022887231,0.0060729184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018758291,0.0002989461,0.00080201286,0.008374832,0.014867272,0.002120408,0.0040307837,0.0035797276,0.00031862743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014440356,0.000056076973,0.009809619,0.00020763517,0.00006109331,0.0005676806,0.026929827,0.000484106,0.0003751961,0.8993799,0.015089878,0.04689455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012723437,0.00025096678,0.2648753,0.0010489261,0.00022516673,0.00067453197,0.05793348,0.0017932702,0.0010063018,0.08390617,0.58773845,0.00042013862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98427653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0888538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0888538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.089215055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6446824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301400346","doi":"10.3366/elr.2022.0783","title":"How Should Complainer Anonymity for Sexual Offences be Introduced in Scotland? Learning the International Lessons of #Letherspeak","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Common law; Scots; Norwegian; Sociology","score_opus":0.10001269728111611,"score_gpt":0.36763392625535485,"score_spread":0.26762122897423873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301400346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06300813,0.15792814,0.001249693,0.653473,0.00636663,0.000104348605,0.000097961965,0.000065396474,0.11770669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70587164,0.12509136,0.0009640256,0.13603,0.004389235,0.000095307696,0.00008657596,0.0000640321,0.027407903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832772,0.00714261,0.0011278245,0.00081042066,0.0043790545,0.003262893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97233206,0.01638824,0.0023077086,0.0010342299,0.0057711033,0.0021666752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026372911,0.00026402329,0.0006477235,0.002169699,0.0042538154,0.008741244,0.0016192317,0.005622022,0.002700733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04727563,0.00042189733,0.00063195615,0.0015626842,0.011838062,0.006557906,0.004481421,0.0064056665,0.00044383615],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001246361,0.00015548951,0.006032374,0.002192871,0.000068470516,0.0022424383,0.03435919,0.00043067013,0.0006271364,0.5747844,0.13328673,0.24569556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008066299,0.00035317862,0.013960741,0.0033752646,0.000100704674,0.0006619012,0.021825979,0.00014590213,0.0006812769,0.022843972,0.9358518,0.00011867189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.117978975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15117614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117978975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012340632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03135687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23458457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}