{"meta":{"query_hash":"a7467a31de8d","filters":{"venue":"Edinburgh Law Review"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a7467a31de8d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Edinburgh+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1984901342","doi":"10.3366/elr.2003.7.2.273","title":"<b>François Gendron, L'INTERPRÉTATION DES CONTRATS</b> Montreal: Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2002. 225 pp (incl index). ISBN 2 89127 561 6 (hb). CA$40.","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Political and Social Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Humanities; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.036894498898736125,"score_gpt":0.3346375266086401,"score_spread":0.29774302770990396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984901342","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017306536,0.6295488,0.00019663933,0.009151061,0.003162442,0.0010305315,0.00009836939,0.0001462368,0.3549353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0539951,0.6529234,0.00037295822,0.009325519,0.0029699795,0.0001947782,0.000060972012,0.00009552291,0.28006178],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99342716,0.0014322582,0.0013459624,0.0008693971,0.0010966233,0.0018285788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967865,0.0006204039,0.0004458227,0.0005783284,0.00055593817,0.001013056],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024292923,0.0007256544,0.0015450527,0.00005522916,0.0012515727,0.00028188596,0.00063722074,0.00062693417,0.022617947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015695848,0.0006935747,0.00070082874,0.0010270979,0.0026143426,0.00097437185,0.0000880878,0.00068622135,0.0018981423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020832318,0.00045517448,0.00036357515,0.0014978377,0.00018021255,0.000059645496,0.0066657434,0.0000027979672,0.00002134246,0.46784875,0.47777507,0.045109045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004590816,0.00008990418,0.00020339285,0.0046762056,0.00046795345,0.000015173087,0.00042881002,0.000014770514,0.000030759318,0.044628344,0.9482671,0.00071849633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08343616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039781164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47049206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006231739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004188484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009206298","doi":"10.3366/elr.2010.0304","title":"“A Strange Archaic Provision of Mercy”: The Procedural Rules for the <i>Duellum</i> under the Law of <i>Clann Duib</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Clan; Sociology; Criticism; History; Classics; Political science","score_opus":0.035471030898331035,"score_gpt":0.3424471035868621,"score_spread":0.30697607268853105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009206298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020163476,0.16724235,0.0009135558,0.5929199,0.0019031992,0.01996686,0.00032016655,0.0001620064,0.19640853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718419,0.020344285,0.0001869303,0.005468322,0.000716603,0.00056287576,0.0000069282787,0.000016167844,0.000855989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987031,0.000087963715,0.00038578012,0.00016855492,0.00039956713,0.00025499397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981813,0.0007967086,0.0002684568,0.0004981476,0.00020215084,0.000053256514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023134272,0.00011504623,0.00024554774,0.000005557244,0.0008415146,0.000040931904,0.0008935759,0.00005914765,0.00015583904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013328434,0.00004835301,0.0002257497,0.00021789187,0.001272716,0.00010880139,0.00007996553,0.0002579725,0.0000041234516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034810612,0.00003707082,0.00000813506,0.00023730515,0.000017390332,3.2140804e-8,0.0007564743,0.0000014309384,0.0005530901,0.984813,0.009312802,0.004259826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008254528,0.000020430263,0.000041564654,0.00027353552,0.00011225674,8.507821e-7,0.00048481606,0.000011283116,0.00029399837,0.016632104,0.9819753,0.00007128612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030871097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006420468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000108312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014450491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6472335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343654611","doi":"10.3366/elr.2016.0351","title":"John Cairns, <i>Codification, Transplants and History: Law Reform in Louisiana (1808) and Quebec (1866)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law reform; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.027099379417512892,"score_gpt":0.28140102567558833,"score_spread":0.25430164625807544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343654611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001004563,0.18586801,0.00005262583,0.021712596,0.00045025253,0.00049267453,0.00006150891,0.000060240476,0.7902975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7677646,0.21243978,0.00011897225,0.00916857,0.000399225,0.00004582531,0.000010376357,0.000011389728,0.010041215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988113,0.00010441124,0.0002978149,0.00025187302,0.00024100221,0.00029360867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933344,0.00013451693,0.000094706615,0.0001667343,0.0000667725,0.00020381146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067148247,0.00012962821,0.000302949,0.000023504326,0.00020998632,0.000017425795,0.00014039892,0.00007339458,0.00051552174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062346415,0.00009218031,0.000040104904,0.00010053881,0.0017112826,0.00028009474,0.000016757593,0.00008308754,0.00001223025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027089252,0.000012533039,0.0002741883,0.00010216244,0.0000052999585,0.000005467737,0.00024568036,5.004216e-9,0.000009153089,0.98808616,0.0077616675,0.003494999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015168604,0.000011188269,0.00015001466,0.0013408297,0.000029672241,0.0000062021086,0.000036707646,9.1162526e-8,0.0000029299342,0.0008338363,0.9972861,0.00015076087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16337402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12944701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000592996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051426486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8864383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W245496813","doi":"10.3366/elr.2007.11.2.290b","title":"Peter C Oliver, <i>The Constitution of Independence: The Development of Constitutional Theory in Australia, Canada and New Zealand</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Independence (probability theory); Law; Constitutional theory; Political science; Constitutional interpretation; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03373830542968244,"score_gpt":0.31719429429644236,"score_spread":0.28345598886675993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W245496813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114101775,0.07188695,0.003041098,0.0074075656,0.003027007,0.0029079418,0.00012921653,0.000035929505,0.7974625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949121,0.0015509849,0.00023591219,0.0012496318,0.00012650277,0.0000048284314,0.0000043033574,0.0000011478867,0.0019146166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858814,0.0001173894,0.00047610237,0.00010642629,0.00049402396,0.00021788532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889535,0.0005793749,0.00019084389,0.000105967236,0.00013181285,0.00009662867],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027996744,0.00008534339,0.00020496728,0.000015885244,0.00024494316,0.0000071350737,0.00019901528,0.0000452847,0.00032273505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026792998,0.000053062395,0.000031749365,0.00020940951,0.0042843823,0.00006893979,0.000033826753,0.00014916067,8.9538895e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054348434,0.000008577383,0.004978812,0.00004029517,0.000012317256,0.0000023547561,0.00039871107,0.0000014357215,0.000004721116,0.9901082,0.0036495968,0.00078956375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102077654,0.0000051745233,0.0017244788,0.0007033314,0.000026806796,0.0000082200195,0.00016384854,4.9382614e-8,0.000049601054,0.0023603486,0.9947819,0.00007415398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46159244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7016418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009996888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008344181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908718997","doi":"10.3366/elr.2019.0523","title":"Sense and Sensibilities: A Feminist Critique of Legal Interventions against Sexual Violence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Law reform; Sexual violence; Sociology; Battle; Action (physics); Criminology; Criminal law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.025980044774639745,"score_gpt":0.34731524723245993,"score_spread":0.3213352024578202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908718997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34325093,0.26717678,0.00001361634,0.0069664726,0.0016432602,0.0021206888,0.00012123587,0.00017760559,0.3785294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79422486,0.18702959,0.00025671133,0.0069234315,0.00042881942,0.000033873792,0.000013866566,0.000013352301,0.011075512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987173,0.00018387733,0.00036012364,0.00024647234,0.00027592047,0.00021629709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922824,0.00015631987,0.0001285718,0.00022976901,0.00015553978,0.00010157937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011967903,0.000115307215,0.00035563158,0.0000030495198,0.0002234005,0.00004314541,0.00008895322,0.00010632845,0.00070121017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021751133,0.0000980135,0.00020304174,0.0001783249,0.0006262069,0.0001932315,0.00006219588,0.00017726113,0.0000132138875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008119035,0.00017508821,0.00053841213,0.008806022,0.00008419489,0.000030649022,0.011969602,6.5529406e-7,0.00029471738,0.8963191,0.07369399,0.008079487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013030074,0.000060836726,0.000015123778,0.011854216,0.000057551337,0.0000130468015,0.0106877005,0.0000019564834,0.000028607868,0.001601423,0.97537553,0.00017371384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088614196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005537555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90168154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034238852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008489946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76777595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921013079","doi":"10.3366/elr.2019.0571","title":"The Principle of Good Faith in Contractual Performance: A Scottish-Canadian Comparison","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Good faith; Honesty; Duty; Law; Fair dealing; Faith; Supreme court; Subject (documents); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.022953268273611438,"score_gpt":0.3342424241363495,"score_spread":0.3112891558627381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921013079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32793155,0.041479874,0.0000032836003,0.0091334395,0.00052640756,0.0026360953,0.000019102035,0.000033859546,0.61823636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800567,0.017738225,0.000025557001,0.0005435334,0.00010413345,0.000055286702,0.0000037916882,0.00000509757,0.001467675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881476,0.00006832786,0.0003717568,0.00014536803,0.00027607783,0.00032371853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992244,0.00015016344,0.00014139748,0.0002728775,0.00007712956,0.00013398618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013967038,0.00007871959,0.00026777273,0.000019208674,0.00031055146,0.000042524152,0.00040217434,0.000052322426,0.0007036786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008361955,0.000056159337,0.00006394586,0.000323546,0.00017730545,0.00015048146,0.00003395503,0.00018022573,0.000089223606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028373076,0.000043221826,0.025861548,0.00017211953,0.000010444247,4.0540834e-7,0.0006932514,0.000006379238,0.000009121851,0.9588244,0.0035663997,0.010809856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010650506,0.000018470442,0.003809776,0.00062120386,0.0000099958415,2.8404054e-7,0.000106568754,0.000043429816,0.0000115064495,0.00012427442,0.99507195,0.00007604878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044198986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17464466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99150556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010645041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003757401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9621658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301400346","doi":"10.3366/elr.2022.0783","title":"How Should Complainer Anonymity for Sexual Offences be Introduced in Scotland? Learning the International Lessons of #Letherspeak","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Common law; Scots; Norwegian; Sociology","score_opus":0.10001269728111611,"score_gpt":0.36763392625535485,"score_spread":0.26762122897423873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301400346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018940484,0.062261127,0.000054288055,0.87283343,0.003008259,0.0023346683,0.0001122948,0.00008980255,0.040365633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356406,0.030557705,0.00032493466,0.012226469,0.0022760874,0.00041998408,0.0001169823,0.000022766184,0.018414496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983924,0.00034386266,0.00021393083,0.00022104074,0.0006168123,0.00021196756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915975,0.0003648764,0.00018543824,0.00013498047,0.00011936909,0.000035606477],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031108763,0.00009644913,0.0002660004,0.00000503594,0.0008465187,0.000059708025,0.0006517458,0.000048883954,0.0010922438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052945485,0.000065860695,0.00013587049,0.00032262155,0.00034355317,0.00014204525,0.00013686971,0.00038533105,3.7679112e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034200522,0.00019179303,0.0015411641,0.00032397956,0.00012113866,0.000002997617,0.023423757,0.00017447534,0.00047698728,0.44700482,0.51618224,0.010522466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017443523,0.00003601688,0.00002121361,0.00012919729,0.00002628202,0.0000010585201,0.013790459,0.000023084687,0.000013856257,0.00095449795,0.98474026,0.00008964607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063198776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015346401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91670007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096081734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008739304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}