{"meta":{"query_hash":"68d6529d0994","filters":{"venue":"Education and the Law"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/68d6529d0994","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Education+and+the+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1988102498","doi":"10.1080/09539960601036193","title":"The right to minority language public school education as a function of the equality guarantee: a reanalysis of the<i>Gosselin</i>Supreme Court of Canada Charter case","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education and the Law","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Legislation; Equal Protection Clause; Constitutional right; Statutory law; Bill of rights; Constitution","score_opus":0.011462347879246155,"score_gpt":0.28950524640312514,"score_spread":0.278042898523879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988102498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06471627,0.0049713403,0.0058698,0.091424435,0.0011565682,0.00016677151,0.0006337383,0.00009959559,0.83096135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85375917,0.003168219,0.0028259298,0.034197025,0.0007829809,0.000104572915,0.00017927012,0.0000812215,0.1049016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989358,0.00060865,0.00014181995,0.00081622024,0.004867508,0.0042078313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710995,0.00089838565,0.00015950066,0.00020106205,0.0011299354,0.00050115766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039299326,0.0004702301,0.000835767,0.001770496,0.016721457,0.012777652,0.0035122142,0.007456898,0.0056861658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073528118,0.00059570535,0.00086989155,0.001592973,0.01470764,0.0031776784,0.003143695,0.010470346,0.0005034236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009787115,0.000007769895,0.00032839875,0.000012954451,0.000003954564,0.00018013275,0.0012623795,0.0002115069,0.00009299911,0.98618156,0.009237536,0.0024711147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019031316,0.000061082465,0.0114754755,0.00073651917,0.00019627534,0.00033963812,0.006449842,0.0050788475,0.001878818,0.43204072,0.54125166,0.00030085468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9646308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97899425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9260728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07392721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11135721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53638196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064309533","doi":"10.1080/0953996032000164715","title":"Privative clauses in special education legislative schemes: are they constitutional under the <i>Canadian Charter?</i>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education and the Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Appeal; Tribunal; Legislature; Standard of review; Statute; Judicial review","score_opus":0.0315993558873076,"score_gpt":0.31709915084016643,"score_spread":0.2854997949528588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064309533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06807961,0.0048073265,0.02219666,0.08664095,0.0013340078,0.00046430147,0.00080940867,0.0003052194,0.81536245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8358364,0.0021077637,0.012690416,0.024985014,0.0004728221,0.0003503127,0.0003407723,0.00010402954,0.123112544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98248255,0.00193061,0.00056883984,0.0014980917,0.008376701,0.005143112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867225,0.0050894786,0.0010254605,0.0013569206,0.00487938,0.00092623074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010931201,0.0003309538,0.0004735651,0.0015671656,0.014180536,0.011700297,0.002506952,0.005872252,0.007628697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029783538,0.00079379376,0.00061770587,0.0023736502,0.023250794,0.0055471123,0.0030318378,0.007438403,0.0005753858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005540524,0.000005192674,0.00029644894,0.000015987349,0.0000017149181,0.000023136166,0.0012922952,0.000109930435,0.000109891545,0.98907834,0.005609233,0.0034523485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011845977,0.0000638984,0.01787857,0.0006659764,0.000115382085,0.0001609333,0.006549314,0.0028035042,0.0028042486,0.37431893,0.594262,0.00025883026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9202356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9462176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94712126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052878715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115645654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3836637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087543695","doi":"10.1080/09539960500165234","title":"Challenging statutory limitations on children's education rights: a re-examination of the Canadian Supreme Court Decision in<i>Auton</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education and the Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Democracy; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Fundamental rights; Mental health; Public administration; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.022869122643670785,"score_gpt":0.2944852770101881,"score_spread":0.2716161543665173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087543695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071133,0.012167375,0.004549475,0.34724283,0.0016918743,0.0001881627,0.00076133513,0.00011142574,0.56215453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7488993,0.005786492,0.0037752215,0.15886241,0.001045567,0.00017328406,0.00024355584,0.00012815653,0.08108603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97227526,0.0032182073,0.0008413356,0.0025314959,0.011584932,0.009548787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98342437,0.008695158,0.00047593514,0.00064623554,0.0054231924,0.0013351004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01627002,0.00072945503,0.0012477908,0.0025417495,0.028918607,0.020780666,0.0063513503,0.017500281,0.0043208706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022747248,0.0008752384,0.0016402799,0.00293847,0.033528015,0.0054825107,0.005490855,0.027691042,0.0004269056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010732159,0.000011861531,0.00059193885,0.000030997307,0.000010808495,0.00032321445,0.007062744,0.00025458902,0.00014310896,0.9646012,0.023273993,0.0036847587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013335998,0.000045334258,0.011860548,0.0015153568,0.00020914404,0.0003641837,0.029071927,0.002731289,0.0014008653,0.28954715,0.6626778,0.00044301985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13675594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13675594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18041228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99223846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}