{"meta":{"query_hash":"68d6529d0994","filters":{"venue":"Education and the Law"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/68d6529d0994","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Education+and+the+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1988102498","doi":"10.1080/09539960601036193","title":"The right to minority language public school education as a function of the equality guarantee: a reanalysis of the<i>Gosselin</i>Supreme Court of Canada Charter case","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education and the Law","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Political science; Legislation; Equal Protection Clause; Constitutional right; Statutory law; Bill of rights; Constitution","score_opus":0.011462347879246155,"score_gpt":0.28950524640312514,"score_spread":0.278042898523879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988102498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8094585,0.00015983326,0.000012873337,0.052815396,0.0007719261,0.00042618846,0.00001780748,0.000005828414,0.13633163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876989,0.000008911314,0.0000074621744,0.001484995,0.00016830018,0.000030473655,0.0000048901843,0.0000030331973,0.010593021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982354,0.00073316233,0.00033759218,0.000118060474,0.0004438735,0.00013188442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864256,0.00018767713,0.0003016229,0.00042299638,0.00039482184,0.000050338567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017033825,0.0000718752,0.00012946343,0.000023708628,0.0007568099,0.0000650607,0.00027636575,0.000038178045,0.00013789814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037835783,0.000035735215,0.0000894826,0.00041967683,0.00045965842,0.00010800743,0.000034089782,0.00007980116,0.0000018465721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022430755,0.00016156511,0.0007170062,0.00001746595,0.00002355501,4.3971653e-8,0.009979762,0.0000011925104,0.0001011758,0.9789718,0.008537919,0.0014661114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001273236,0.000050620492,0.083272226,0.00014449876,0.00064007967,0.000018883466,0.24792655,0.00007526568,0.0037874673,0.16154003,0.50083506,0.00043605588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7758436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9113885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81743175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084932406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016269071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5820846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064309533","doi":"10.1080/0953996032000164715","title":"Privative clauses in special education legislative schemes: are they constitutional under the <i>Canadian Charter?</i>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education and the Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Appeal; Tribunal; Legislature; Standard of review; Statute; Judicial review","score_opus":0.0315993558873076,"score_gpt":0.31709915084016643,"score_spread":0.2854997949528588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064309533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057016294,0.0007744789,0.0000075362123,0.09538948,0.0016393139,0.00075250294,0.0000060743732,0.000014278776,0.84440005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910367,0.00010434606,0.00005021889,0.0046711476,0.00089610496,0.00009600922,0.0000045579504,0.0000026065863,0.003138288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990079,0.00039043732,0.00011895648,0.0001321689,0.00017683368,0.00017371756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999383,0.00022097192,0.000084261526,0.000082130595,0.0001588046,0.00007087037],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004972385,0.000084573636,0.00009600733,0.00002362754,0.0019016267,0.00014664629,0.00011777643,0.000053049145,0.00017424763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002994372,0.00004784408,0.000029197017,0.00015837494,0.0023492167,0.00020336939,0.0000109300345,0.00015007444,0.000032517037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033980848,0.00004253565,0.0018818906,0.0000011709939,0.000011258625,3.033665e-8,0.07296773,8.6184485e-7,8.182246e-7,0.922345,0.0024534853,0.00029185636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022604773,0.0000027348465,0.012399774,0.000024159724,0.000008343009,7.1914235e-7,0.14405859,4.955324e-7,0.000009771628,0.07702608,0.7661624,0.000080917176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0998463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6632797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9340204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003222051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014731139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087543695","doi":"10.1080/09539960500165234","title":"Challenging statutory limitations on children's education rights: a re-examination of the Canadian Supreme Court Decision in<i>Auton</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education and the Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Democracy; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Fundamental rights; Mental health; Public administration; Sociology; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.022869122643670785,"score_gpt":0.2944852770101881,"score_spread":0.2716161543665173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087543695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76347536,0.0009909914,0.0000035886112,0.09313126,0.0009825602,0.00090845814,0.000007059372,0.000021577847,0.14047918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970777,0.00015705991,0.00012362964,0.0012316101,0.00024349267,0.000046770143,0.000010035287,0.0000041519443,0.0011055318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990515,0.0002549403,0.00016735958,0.0001263682,0.0002533425,0.00014648648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992597,0.0003018736,0.000095502066,0.00013153684,0.0001543706,0.000057014186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059009145,0.00007387746,0.00008716208,0.000056492783,0.0014106674,0.00006319608,0.00015500776,0.000057189252,0.000023988801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022463888,0.000044840664,0.000034870078,0.00018823946,0.0003866987,0.00019362704,0.000014888059,0.00012566257,0.000008686829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005314643,0.00013732715,0.00075592456,0.0000030215476,0.000007705664,9.341905e-9,0.11167782,0.0000561508,0.000001533887,0.8603144,0.0015085456,0.025532223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007424315,0.000016970738,0.64304084,0.0001664369,0.000031574804,5.8590007e-7,0.039437886,0.000075060016,0.000054899894,0.011201755,0.305048,0.00018356732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25488046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8410602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8491127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000458723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004715404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}