{"meta":{"query_hash":"de01f93be4de","filters":{"venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/de01f93be4de","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Educational+Research+and+Evaluation"},"results":[{"id":"W1970473206","doi":"10.1076/edre.7.2.161.3867","title":"Backs to the Wall: Supporting Teacher Professional Development With Technology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Education and Technology Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Professional development; Connection (principal bundle); Faculty development; Curriculum development; Engineering management; Pedagogy; Computer science; Mathematics education; Engineering; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.18542202049888507,"score_gpt":0.5366876010260208,"score_spread":0.3512655805271357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970473206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3203751,0.0019910287,0.18771222,0.0281353,0.0012892744,0.001840269,0.00019099169,0.0042240615,0.45424166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6400788,0.0023689633,0.19644605,0.002611466,0.00019763137,0.00095274486,0.00035734716,0.00081018725,0.15617682],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926577,0.0043685785,0.0001538344,0.0003605019,0.0014668688,0.0009925269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912298,0.0034021942,0.0004405717,0.0009175824,0.0013526792,0.002657356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058484077,0.00051494164,0.00031999886,0.0010693045,0.00497719,0.007941814,0.0014010292,0.0019660345,0.011071701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016009906,0.0005471217,0.0003617816,0.00079397764,0.0025036358,0.004825511,0.0060168165,0.0019539997,0.005185202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019257516,0.0015328778,0.00629276,0.00045555743,0.00001656062,0.0009398938,0.06422907,0.0010959519,0.005435138,0.023947563,0.054211177,0.841651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033465313,0.0012723795,0.01143129,0.00140438,0.00005834765,0.0011915647,0.05871453,0.0058257747,0.0068977475,0.0158972,0.89683354,0.00013846978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016288811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031231306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016288811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027718972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017639497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037038565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972548285","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2013.767624","title":"Assessing statistical aspects of test fairness with structural equation modelling","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Test (biology); Measurement invariance; Psychology; Confirmatory factor analysis; Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Item response theory; Social psychology; Statistics; Psychometrics; Test validity; Interpretation (philosophy); Mathematics; Computer science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.8738377455316619,"score_gpt":0.6435779505699563,"score_spread":0.23025979496170568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972548285","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037302483,0.00022907149,0.95551986,0.0011246373,0.00010398134,0.00063732575,0.0002639004,0.00041646123,0.0044021923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4791074,0.00014920236,0.51738816,0.0003235147,0.00010418099,0.0019477889,0.00034335838,0.00020756845,0.0004287991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.61933964,0.31816852,0.01431777,0.010706868,0.036025118,0.0014420698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1878153,0.7156386,0.023082342,0.055122524,0.017598711,0.0007425837],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.26208466,0.0014618532,0.0015917858,0.005008941,0.0020064246,0.006306447,0.002850304,0.0016741212,0.0035604327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7308653,0.0009678814,0.0025101607,0.008220742,0.0063082664,0.0066617522,0.0051088044,0.004380211,0.00045170833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005642721,0.0006840539,0.17171152,0.0013233406,0.0027205155,0.000397743,0.009722422,0.05452482,0.0015634805,0.37707782,0.0063279094,0.37338215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016813389,0.0005293533,0.041524176,0.00071652443,0.0004914068,0.00038459778,0.0016571495,0.30529234,0.0036939615,0.6333353,0.012019095,0.00018804334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036730464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035341345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26208466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002508579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063713663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.909981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995874702","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2014.997915","title":"What response rates are needed to make reliable inferences from student evaluations of teaching?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Range (aeronautics); Statistics; Confidence interval; Stability (learning theory); Psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Machine learning","score_opus":0.38417253970056386,"score_gpt":0.6224553468616918,"score_spread":0.23828280716112793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995874702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50029796,0.0020795122,0.44150558,0.02900873,0.00151869,0.0048846854,0.003192856,0.00093829073,0.016573729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89077544,0.00039840426,0.099147834,0.0027004776,0.0002335716,0.005488389,0.0006797266,0.00014721627,0.00042885626],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.41788915,0.50037456,0.024457645,0.010519138,0.043516275,0.0032432552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20481429,0.66905975,0.043372497,0.045203693,0.035745014,0.0018047959],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.36777297,0.00084186107,0.0023054467,0.001664913,0.0013176039,0.0042387606,0.0027763746,0.00483109,0.0021183952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7539178,0.00091869896,0.0023775627,0.002468792,0.0026952303,0.0068391804,0.002301475,0.0037744825,0.0015738411],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006159716,0.0016935981,0.32476014,0.005384089,0.001984183,0.000482076,0.017164042,0.03424264,0.0066374266,0.03513168,0.0193029,0.5470575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022804989,0.013548096,0.5786208,0.008110695,0.0012370759,0.001808119,0.015349362,0.13404629,0.035068516,0.1488616,0.059982143,0.0010866974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002871785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017402611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63222706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002946391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036625685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7796485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999097841","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383489","title":"Reflection on Teaching: Types and Goals of Reflection","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Psychology; Elaboration; Cognition; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy; Neuroscience; Humanities","score_opus":0.3760522189486467,"score_gpt":0.6269748441534377,"score_spread":0.250922625204791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999097841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5477114,0.0022810423,0.32454592,0.009057743,0.00021816461,0.0010016803,0.000359846,0.0006061175,0.11421807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94690174,0.00064492394,0.04973089,0.0003304258,0.00004861289,0.00036374026,0.00015770266,0.00012344861,0.0016984962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712214,0.01594758,0.0022698625,0.0017897324,0.0071608718,0.0016106162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303645,0.040606786,0.009198827,0.010835502,0.0066514052,0.002342984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01830476,0.0004887827,0.0006371648,0.0029312368,0.00096727395,0.00671421,0.0015522807,0.0029238726,0.0010091249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064588636,0.0005395246,0.000984353,0.001978759,0.0051275296,0.0077053467,0.0041487683,0.0022905858,0.00042971835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053521985,0.00069620874,0.13719092,0.001635129,0.00016989173,0.00042035332,0.13031007,0.0030267953,0.008516095,0.39224187,0.003889658,0.32136777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013278572,0.000882205,0.13328688,0.0022294766,0.00019831011,0.003697288,0.085081875,0.016464936,0.018391492,0.6840891,0.05525595,0.0002896176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004696791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004906668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01830476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015228043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022137929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09680599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004698653","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2012.704171","title":"An interdisciplinary analysis of microteaching evaluation forms: how peer feedback forms shape what constitutes “good teaching”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Microteaching; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Presentation (obstetrics); Teaching method; Peer feedback; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Psychology; Sample (material); Peer assessment; Perception; Session (web analytics); Pedagogy; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.37915352348574416,"score_gpt":0.5708644718789562,"score_spread":0.191710948393212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004698653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95792645,0.00023246117,0.023366945,0.0011151471,0.000059168447,0.00083474116,0.000083369705,0.000075683805,0.016305974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987763,0.000105894294,0.009070149,0.00015020903,0.000017312159,0.0005614336,0.00003813136,0.000058574937,0.0022353327],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9155794,0.06825482,0.0029263839,0.0022224635,0.00971084,0.0013061016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6964174,0.24356113,0.015003235,0.011121073,0.03161954,0.002277602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.062172092,0.00037793448,0.00057968847,0.003041109,0.0031705422,0.005444501,0.0010629497,0.0006179408,0.0022241042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18618558,0.00034190615,0.00040285467,0.0023460134,0.005376815,0.0034365866,0.0037929113,0.0012567915,0.0002938826],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045241884,0.00029994224,0.06807748,0.0007286981,0.00004016912,0.00030294465,0.666059,0.00049083657,0.0062671225,0.008737779,0.0017208464,0.24682269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049307946,0.0010366117,0.18865691,0.0009983012,0.000070559276,0.0006236905,0.75252366,0.003620288,0.010735667,0.011286217,0.030235006,0.00016379978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014755748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003757714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062172092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00427346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004398684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3288014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019696548","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383499","title":"Cross-Case Study of Self-Regulated Learning as a Series of Events","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Self-regulated learning; Psychology; Mathematics education; Construct (python library); Adaptation (eye); Strengths and weaknesses; Exploratory research; Test (biology); Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.279952846329902,"score_gpt":0.6007857704695032,"score_spread":0.3208329241396012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019696548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98766553,0.0001238505,0.007893799,0.00024790486,0.000020235479,0.00022404113,0.000045971807,0.000024003608,0.0037546565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99163824,0.00011705263,0.006194048,0.00008313632,0.000016794374,0.00020243386,0.00006587269,0.000009206112,0.0016731842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927307,0.0046520997,0.00031413775,0.0007438885,0.0009367319,0.000622515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98348606,0.0097067775,0.0019929118,0.0014789181,0.001517367,0.0018180883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054685613,0.0004278806,0.0003795296,0.0015270981,0.0036139335,0.0017742696,0.0015471544,0.0020081506,0.0016510119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016359998,0.00028018426,0.00057870196,0.0012577407,0.0017381791,0.0019240133,0.0026790395,0.0016051639,0.00036487117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012209074,0.013070155,0.32867727,0.00082662894,0.00038039582,0.084420964,0.3260436,0.019407298,0.015338947,0.025091968,0.0042950455,0.18122685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003641074,0.010383924,0.29635364,0.00088162156,0.00032139444,0.07276304,0.42276496,0.049434848,0.04101297,0.01578007,0.08937592,0.00056352717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025232262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005438406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054685613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023092874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012791278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028920889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027477741","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383479","title":"Students' Experiences With Good and Poor University Courses","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill-Queen's University Press","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Psychology; Coding (social sciences); Context (archaeology); Teaching method; Pedagogy; Sample (material); Sociology","score_opus":0.2813300470844611,"score_gpt":0.5690290472988807,"score_spread":0.28769900021441963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027477741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972314,0.00012263499,0.00018520508,0.0006637065,0.000015892856,0.00000933517,0.00000935219,0.0000143072475,0.0017479827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987908,0.00008145573,0.00012835393,0.00013738206,0.000005479551,0.000007213292,0.000008771324,0.0000070238816,0.00083346776],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993602,0.0033923865,0.00038432784,0.00026552024,0.00097446516,0.0013813324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897159,0.003267403,0.0025225151,0.00043809167,0.0008380193,0.0032180692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030798903,0.0005051452,0.0007453475,0.0016262897,0.0075958236,0.0046989387,0.0011232307,0.0020972695,0.0021427558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0153483115,0.00059031445,0.0006097636,0.0009978774,0.005470299,0.0018921376,0.0062309075,0.0037894049,0.0004241309],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018714243,0.0003494844,0.102443166,0.0001329557,0.000047628273,0.007823803,0.86285305,0.00028748956,0.0016325252,0.0014114436,0.0019069933,0.02092435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010319208,0.0003933518,0.038448203,0.0000874078,0.000029878189,0.008685585,0.9409364,0.00032491336,0.00084990903,0.00060859876,0.00955127,0.00007409409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037722066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010729316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075958236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024172096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018377537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01753813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058115470","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383539","title":"Acquisition of Complex Systemic Thinking: Mental Models of Evolution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Similarity (geometry); Complex adaptive system; Pathfinder; Complex system; Mental model; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Biology","score_opus":0.377250872500605,"score_gpt":0.43980211710321165,"score_spread":0.06255124460260664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058115470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99946016,0.000008187388,0.00017291929,0.000025894182,0.0000011558984,0.000005027726,0.0000029008363,0.0000021923406,0.00032141135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907,0.000024852527,0.0005774689,0.000016017697,0.0000017339594,0.0000127475205,0.000015258486,0.0000016353823,0.00028018188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902296,0.00044779968,0.000039519295,0.00013515836,0.0002626598,0.000091831236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840994,0.009002536,0.0033951553,0.0012747723,0.0006577068,0.0015704106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020949356,0.00038567753,0.00023908271,0.00043319023,0.00029476173,0.0021713204,0.00041188166,0.0003902741,0.0022837308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018885178,0.00022588688,0.00026830396,0.00025612753,0.0011694629,0.0010331523,0.0010834818,0.001545659,0.0002069899],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020811118,0.008828741,0.7685959,0.0002506538,0.0002441467,0.00048930105,0.02744593,0.004501692,0.040060047,0.006258889,0.0009483666,0.14029524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023135956,0.00915772,0.91849446,0.000072347866,0.00020109053,0.000599531,0.0123417815,0.027288696,0.015532516,0.013150439,0.0027896513,0.0001404883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009379909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013109078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022837308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004527742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005288682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011079252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058526604","doi":"10.1080/13803610600587008","title":"Variation in socioeconomic gradients among cantons in French- and Italian-speaking Switzerland: Findings from the OECD PISA","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"German; Socioeconomic status; Variation (astronomy); Multilevel model; Inequality; Psychology; Literacy; Demography; Geography; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.08711754206741903,"score_gpt":0.41567619934483596,"score_spread":0.32855865727741695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058526604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99736905,0.00017877122,0.000028980141,0.0000996958,0.0000041014637,0.0000055281566,0.00064083847,0.0000049609685,0.0016681446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917537,0.000074258984,0.000019492496,0.000011191261,0.0000033842782,0.0000072904986,0.00056746684,0.0000013280543,0.00014024775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991635,0.0002133515,0.000057217345,0.00012716226,0.00017561718,0.00026319374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980136,0.0004632745,0.00060634816,0.00012872375,0.0005206679,0.00026732535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016589935,0.00036349497,0.0002954564,0.002858648,0.0008162698,0.0011965163,0.00030398896,0.00033260207,0.0017910184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00265662,0.00011494827,0.0005042278,0.0032147206,0.00075021316,0.00032607437,0.0011948694,0.0002813825,0.00019371233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009350444,0.00001961562,0.99333656,0.000022287586,0.000053132666,0.0001327903,0.0017816549,0.0001672982,0.0002041135,0.00024068367,0.0004849198,0.003463451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001095608,0.000011511439,0.99916136,0.000004350572,0.000005054651,0.000009799362,0.00059273414,0.000030214598,0.000018903826,0.0000068224163,0.00015613694,0.0000020498228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18884024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23481658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18884024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016863212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079813343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37548214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065172628","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2011.563087","title":"Studying for success: diaries of students' study behaviours","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Test (biology); Set (abstract data type); Academic achievement; Applied psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.641263373496236,"score_gpt":0.6376982019110164,"score_spread":0.0035651715852195176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065172628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98456407,0.00020757818,0.0030365176,0.00017357228,0.00007651779,0.0010656178,0.0045195105,0.00021813798,0.0061385636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97261876,0.00036676638,0.013185332,0.00013466626,0.000096981945,0.0026495648,0.0048866356,0.00006322796,0.0059981556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712664,0.0009719166,0.00059607584,0.00040169695,0.0007433028,0.000160407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97866595,0.009195126,0.004356677,0.0018265767,0.003442378,0.0025132596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003679063,0.00062217924,0.0007894239,0.002902778,0.00057072245,0.0012573776,0.0006874671,0.0007552455,0.0025904248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019656327,0.00043866277,0.00039246227,0.0014958868,0.00030486227,0.00069614605,0.0011369869,0.0016613131,0.0015526614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016619315,0.0016026108,0.7675891,0.00059187505,0.00018450133,0.00015121247,0.010420396,0.0005596153,0.007628557,0.0002288734,0.0060103675,0.20337097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007442009,0.0014334756,0.98530465,0.00007799798,0.000058668582,0.00010519364,0.002914433,0.0015744925,0.0027311658,0.00020605228,0.0054372186,0.00008219425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001056002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003646808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003679063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041682398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000537667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019456983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066162995","doi":"10.1080/13803610902804382","title":"Factors influencing academic success and retention following a 1st-year post-secondary success course","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Youth Substance Use and School Attendance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Academic achievement; Coping (psychology); Impulsivity; Attendance; Anxiety; Openness to experience; Mental health; Disadvantaged; Developmental psychology; Study skills; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.1829247299426056,"score_gpt":0.48446176149228837,"score_spread":0.30153703154968275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066162995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991585,0.000093578186,0.000019589424,0.00010649189,0.000016402719,0.000028668053,0.00009389876,0.0000039266265,0.0004789627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978948,0.0000883697,0.000038058297,0.00004815835,0.000030610958,0.00003222022,0.0002474755,0.0000030866477,0.0016173295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896896,0.000116958014,0.00008727581,0.00008574852,0.0002832443,0.0004578498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99183357,0.0007403174,0.0020985282,0.00022257546,0.0010826013,0.0040223477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020375852,0.0005911077,0.0006748842,0.0013671285,0.0018609928,0.0015914569,0.001218784,0.0010081884,0.0048040706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007024064,0.0002906947,0.0008331875,0.00089139846,0.0005171638,0.00083760143,0.0014913633,0.002508641,0.0017228862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002190229,0.0029574044,0.9874435,0.00002115691,0.00003848294,0.00011156976,0.0007197917,0.000063749816,0.00020966567,0.000031073447,0.0004160677,0.007768414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008364369,0.0011572492,0.99736637,0.000015217179,0.000015319338,0.000042312007,0.0008681041,0.00015554418,0.00010111776,0.000024628765,0.00023592408,0.0000099131385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018469572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027257115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018469572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009071014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016567003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03672415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066424609","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383469","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on Postsecondary Instruction: The Old Science of Phrenology and the New Science of College Teaching","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Ideological and Political Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Phrenology; Science education; Mathematics education; Postsecondary education; Pseudoscience; Psychology; Higher education; Medicine; Political science; Alternative medicine; Law","score_opus":0.08567639787092902,"score_gpt":0.4682868208877472,"score_spread":0.3826104230168182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066424609","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006531571,0.09582234,0.0029068447,0.1052486,0.71252596,0.00034879893,0.0019368894,0.0008185534,0.0797389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035125534,0.07879614,0.0022838286,0.035089143,0.630927,0.000286227,0.0025132394,0.00053179683,0.24606009],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983646,0.00019911505,0.00017109142,0.00018726905,0.00090951764,0.00016833548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98801893,0.0030820353,0.00078921014,0.00043442423,0.005414286,0.002260997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024302271,0.002081655,0.0023712635,0.0049520466,0.001417323,0.005791872,0.0018608476,0.004198658,0.1349801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00554413,0.00079985603,0.0012129974,0.0028179998,0.0010045173,0.0050052614,0.002600385,0.006201936,0.074858434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008159198,0.000016213015,0.000047434292,0.000083953215,0.0000022488439,0.000016155967,0.000018728066,0.000011513294,0.000054892975,0.00023116736,0.9770319,0.022477677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012218259,0.000040469364,0.0007976737,0.00034506846,0.000008781543,0.00012601967,0.00008267907,0.000033647302,0.000064873755,0.0011369095,0.9973373,0.000014419465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033750178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006557406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1349801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019461578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027709946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4515534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072781869","doi":"10.1076/edre.7.2.223.3863","title":"Developing a Computer-Assisted Tutoring Program to Help Children at Risk Learn to Read","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministère de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport Québec","keywords":"Formative assessment; Computer-Assisted Instruction; Computer science; Reading (process); Class (philosophy); Social constructivism; Quality (philosophy); Mathematics education; Program evaluation; Multimedia; Medical education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.28325707540413153,"score_gpt":0.5312908933485849,"score_spread":0.2480338179444534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072781869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97310334,0.00017304445,0.018691331,0.00017699442,0.0000498883,0.0033712522,0.00012269216,0.00079795934,0.0035134533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7068335,0.0008537604,0.277151,0.00024058118,0.000051644376,0.005829037,0.0009783213,0.00016952897,0.007892638],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987129,0.0005457924,0.000099047764,0.00015701441,0.0003373572,0.00014789184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977264,0.0009899321,0.00021722708,0.00014116778,0.00041847225,0.00050693075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025743048,0.00073554344,0.0005017273,0.00062292715,0.0006497787,0.00081313256,0.0010323363,0.0007087303,0.0013907196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076689515,0.00032118012,0.00049626175,0.00022548425,0.00043568207,0.0010141974,0.0007964909,0.0007872397,0.00044315023],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014539344,0.033355318,0.02071213,0.0006946567,0.000077542936,0.0009165028,0.01099624,0.0037285856,0.037936684,0.0005729968,0.003072782,0.88648266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0133305425,0.2652002,0.2676734,0.0007612606,0.0014487302,0.009472978,0.015247064,0.05092049,0.28462315,0.0028834709,0.08787185,0.0005668831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026888868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040230723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026888868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005599828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001751216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013614416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145422031","doi":"10.1076/edre.7.2.185.3869","title":"Technology Integration for Students with Disabilities: Empirically Based Recommendations for Faculty","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Adaptation (eye); Sample (material); Medical education; Psychology; Assistive technology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Medicine; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.44902564159165687,"score_gpt":0.6137609149944456,"score_spread":0.16473527340278876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145422031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1574962,0.0241045,0.03041954,0.6911978,0.0033157826,0.027771994,0.0014360162,0.0026514884,0.0616067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57418567,0.034981556,0.31085482,0.034116343,0.00064867194,0.03247343,0.0017275134,0.00021342168,0.010798576],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94059235,0.044098306,0.004148283,0.0017544887,0.0063621867,0.003044345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.746441,0.17342149,0.011355866,0.008844117,0.040747102,0.019190323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07474036,0.0024824608,0.0019795708,0.0065855784,0.008675157,0.012865776,0.009314574,0.01091967,0.014293713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21882303,0.001342778,0.0016256139,0.0070417225,0.0042328113,0.011036739,0.0071096215,0.0055779913,0.0018568848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010238694,0.020670155,0.06562688,0.009133096,0.00025877004,0.0013663633,0.015627744,0.0052709933,0.0010065332,0.019437118,0.11519266,0.7453858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075655384,0.011129592,0.10779288,0.0724377,0.0027748365,0.00088617613,0.5061319,0.021152293,0.0068756673,0.07293885,0.1891978,0.0011167304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024834342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07443477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07474036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011052442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087882556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3952695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093238068","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2020.1830119","title":"Effective numeracy educational interventions for students from disadvantaged social background: a comparison of two teaching methods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Mathematics education; Socioeconomic status; Numeracy; Subtraction; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Teaching method; Social constructivism; Mastery learning; Social studies; Pedagogy; Mathematics; Medicine; Population; Literacy","score_opus":0.36217738808249983,"score_gpt":0.6742622103928949,"score_spread":0.3120848223103951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093238068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996342,0.0009628378,0.0008870471,0.00007700557,0.00004071709,0.0007698072,0.000024235362,0.000024248448,0.0008721116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833171,0.0022454918,0.009976353,0.00013319994,0.00006652566,0.0029146639,0.00006681624,0.000008042987,0.0012717381],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813133,0.00074730656,0.00021817411,0.00023782569,0.00052099855,0.00014428572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974113,0.0014828763,0.00045512442,0.00015886167,0.00011807377,0.00037375357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015645736,0.0006470648,0.0011752723,0.0012674454,0.0004890822,0.000552825,0.00062756176,0.000658383,0.0035402218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062533612,0.0003029893,0.0005944694,0.0004204349,0.0003871211,0.00063974265,0.00097594404,0.00067926035,0.00026050492],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.042677045,0.080738425,0.016651122,0.00258322,0.0007253212,0.00014992963,0.0031620013,0.00072565296,0.00815571,0.0005449528,0.0002401052,0.84364647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.10896715,0.4702939,0.3757813,0.0023169334,0.0041831275,0.0006806895,0.0048118946,0.0045279264,0.019871946,0.0013000407,0.0070174458,0.00024762744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012538551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003703991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035402218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059869187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010656797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0118432045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138121929","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2021.1902354","title":"Linking personality to teachers’ literacy in classroom assessment: a cross-cultural study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Summative assessment; Formative assessment; Psychology; Literacy; Competence (human resources); Personality; Pedagogy; Big Five personality traits; Empathy; Mathematics education; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3451683761205265,"score_gpt":0.6177916604486202,"score_spread":0.27262328432809374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138121929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999579,0.000029083465,0.000058415335,0.000010839006,0.0000022487627,0.000006576371,0.000004375384,5.026183e-7,0.00030895788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996525,0.000031165368,0.00009844555,0.00001581761,0.0000015692564,0.000007852511,0.0000073899882,0.0000014175712,0.00018385524],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974485,0.001310888,0.00020037216,0.0002115111,0.0005720363,0.0002566551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905607,0.0042456775,0.0015325117,0.0008205076,0.0018571195,0.0009835528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051872637,0.000258854,0.00039841165,0.0010778804,0.0012969836,0.0017827274,0.00030957905,0.0003857165,0.00077716267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011368546,0.00038867793,0.0003591048,0.0006672865,0.0015641527,0.0007021299,0.0016656045,0.00092215114,0.00015227954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011683168,0.00045343526,0.8566695,0.00005658869,0.000072566036,0.00046388942,0.124944925,0.00007524662,0.0015030592,0.00013088684,0.00011511948,0.01539802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007663623,0.0002728932,0.942017,0.000033306762,0.000026300344,0.00060423184,0.0555878,0.00015822853,0.00036056066,0.000063825326,0.00084957154,0.000018691937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0138731245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025664542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0138731245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008834692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081452617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027584732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404492912","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2024.2424351","title":"Learning outcomes as perceived enjoyment in studying accounting – personal & environmental factors","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Accounting Education and Careers","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Accounting; Business","score_opus":0.14882427181464222,"score_gpt":0.40999232881525255,"score_spread":0.2611680570006103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404492912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99792284,0.000048580903,0.000056784807,0.00005809207,0.0000030032143,0.000011586017,0.00005347606,0.0000045596794,0.0018411574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897623,0.000047617566,0.0000819197,0.000015290658,0.000006356661,0.000011388374,0.000094378964,0.0000015789695,0.0007653541],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891317,0.00031123005,0.00009893253,0.000080396676,0.0003287398,0.00026751423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892163,0.002758601,0.0041392883,0.00035921973,0.0008387842,0.0026878337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001872592,0.000311962,0.00025312838,0.0010593499,0.00051616086,0.0022956817,0.00038344073,0.00053690857,0.0062218877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007423561,0.00012990517,0.00070250104,0.0006531476,0.0006674655,0.0009164456,0.0015347119,0.00091524835,0.0005524913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001405242,0.0012669149,0.9822764,0.000044134526,0.00009152294,0.00009053512,0.0019429966,0.00028760478,0.00071962416,0.00016989959,0.00021901862,0.012750925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023195641,0.0002092546,0.9973327,0.000009310281,0.000011345527,0.000031720392,0.0017429106,0.00018631805,0.00014863102,0.000057254183,0.0002603411,0.00000791692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022164413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045495117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062218877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047619236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003949126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0208143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414618650","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2025.2562417","title":"Exploring research-related knowledge and attitudes: a study among university students in Lebanon","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Qatar National Library","keywords":"Knowledge level; Qualitative research; Research methodology; Data collection; Statistical analysis; Higher education","score_opus":0.4192136329234551,"score_gpt":0.5727066749372391,"score_spread":0.15349304201378405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414618650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99970955,0.000059857615,0.000011663317,0.00004324345,0.0000013586856,0.000006817747,0.00000858854,3.540272e-7,0.00015861182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999383,0.00013747346,0.00004496708,0.00009281025,0.000005444959,0.0000135532455,0.000015396907,4.7242938e-7,0.00030674756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932253,0.00020215918,0.000056319466,0.00006931193,0.00013675487,0.00021290268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980519,0.00049777055,0.00047160115,0.00004942693,0.0002752468,0.00065410027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018178393,0.00022072945,0.0003703744,0.0016011945,0.002252814,0.0013763773,0.00035443128,0.0006698103,0.0016708816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020061075,0.00030039347,0.0002947806,0.001287498,0.0007991445,0.0007958653,0.0006940776,0.0006008633,0.00030077173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101658756,0.0010692247,0.95398635,0.00006866195,0.000020067015,0.0005361765,0.031850178,0.000028673212,0.000989389,0.00009924182,0.0001457153,0.011104794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017703871,0.0010855434,0.9215591,0.00006542701,0.000019080135,0.00031414998,0.07511291,0.00012631896,0.00030072755,0.000070820344,0.0013117538,0.000016512544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010354203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016284937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010354203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012927966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017441631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020587862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}