{"meta":{"query_hash":"de01f93be4de","filters":{"venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/de01f93be4de","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Educational+Research+and+Evaluation"},"results":[{"id":"W1970473206","doi":"10.1076/edre.7.2.161.3867","title":"Backs to the Wall: Supporting Teacher Professional Development With Technology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Education and Technology Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Professional development; Connection (principal bundle); Faculty development; Curriculum development; Engineering management; Pedagogy; Computer science; Mathematics education; Engineering; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.18542202049888507,"score_gpt":0.5366876010260208,"score_spread":0.3512655805271357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970473206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6888188,0.000070748465,0.000046488316,0.29658416,0.00016513701,0.00058362883,2.285154e-7,0.000019369762,0.0137114115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627318,0.000020312464,0.0010670158,0.00023756833,0.0001921154,0.0007973168,0.000031861367,0.000005556561,0.03491645],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798816,0.00027885666,0.00015439156,0.0002181093,0.0010429453,0.00031752212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981432,0.00028976178,0.000048134978,0.00013459899,0.0012802545,0.00010404592],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055150925,0.0000595177,0.00005028721,0.000332146,0.0015609225,0.00007451965,0.00020008256,0.00009438227,0.002668637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024879745,0.000039834642,0.000006964063,0.0009771488,0.00030686887,0.00013178654,0.00003373269,0.00028791808,0.000267717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078508674,0.00061881804,0.29068676,0.000006552732,0.00003547091,4.1373005e-7,0.04428672,0.000009822671,0.00024437977,0.2517041,0.07944745,0.33288103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019661536,0.00010088558,0.23041238,0.000043927794,0.000005798162,0.0000067541473,0.053376846,0.00013001577,0.00018728878,0.028124904,0.6872993,0.00011525866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002477226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051225685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60785186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003167621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003484021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972548285","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2013.767624","title":"Assessing statistical aspects of test fairness with structural equation modelling","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Test (biology); Measurement invariance; Psychology; Confirmatory factor analysis; Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Item response theory; Social psychology; Statistics; Psychometrics; Test validity; Interpretation (philosophy); Mathematics; Computer science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.8738377455316619,"score_gpt":0.6435779505699563,"score_spread":0.23025979496170568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972548285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89039207,0.00013832876,0.10005519,0.0014508304,0.00010529354,0.00035368954,0.0000040160517,0.0000043694604,0.0074962038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9462619,0.0000045064203,0.053391933,0.000007885283,0.00011823028,0.00005482688,0.000024879342,0.0000048929887,0.00013098538],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949804,0.00072473165,0.0003956738,0.00034699214,0.0033135405,0.00023865105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9068164,0.08746363,0.00021473732,0.00027202076,0.005084917,0.00014828972],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01299373,0.00007252405,0.00013908232,0.0005194827,0.00028933623,0.0005325719,0.00020151008,0.00003988286,0.0019655253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12122044,0.000048150192,0.000012441731,0.0013836469,0.0002156028,0.0008394137,0.000047546007,0.00016465067,0.00004205663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051023795,0.00021890251,0.35368782,0.000043873915,0.00002585977,3.675041e-7,0.0010435138,0.020118948,0.0021868218,0.12551624,0.0022573606,0.49484926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010115971,0.000076186836,0.3260706,0.000012335596,0.0000021949184,0.0000021560893,0.0008300514,0.3031575,0.00005974195,0.3696504,0.0000063462176,0.000031319963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027563592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008790206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49481794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078301535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007182315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995874702","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2014.997915","title":"What response rates are needed to make reliable inferences from student evaluations of teaching?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Range (aeronautics); Statistics; Confidence interval; Stability (learning theory); Psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Machine learning","score_opus":0.38417253970056386,"score_gpt":0.6224553468616918,"score_spread":0.23828280716112793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995874702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8305631,0.00040471018,0.000061527004,0.16305827,0.0005797557,0.0007831887,0.000006758305,0.00001396738,0.0045286664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920956,0.00015514769,0.0021716456,0.00040469362,0.00051444606,0.00030803325,0.00006598508,0.0000105719855,0.0042738845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98621833,0.00859986,0.00040414635,0.00040768337,0.0040398776,0.00033007652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820212,0.0142181525,0.0002566345,0.00032133056,0.0029152578,0.00026739086],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06037384,0.00010762107,0.00016641212,0.000472268,0.0014229409,0.0006376741,0.00037986608,0.00008898683,0.0017991757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08054115,0.000106877545,0.00003137282,0.00049786444,0.0002789024,0.0010837718,0.00010182846,0.0003412331,0.00020347285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019223277,0.0026716224,0.23441926,0.000059996237,0.00024109274,2.3006886e-7,0.33966112,0.0032569033,0.009580683,0.16987029,0.13009562,0.10822088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006066111,0.0004015348,0.7075664,0.000285538,0.00005168014,2.3108383e-7,0.12552895,0.0022885061,0.00036654196,0.105446324,0.05725489,0.00020278766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076777954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046387888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47314715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035542776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002233589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999097841","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383489","title":"Reflection on Teaching: Types and Goals of Reflection","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Psychology; Elaboration; Cognition; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Philosophy; Neuroscience; Humanities","score_opus":0.3760522189486467,"score_gpt":0.6269748441534377,"score_spread":0.250922625204791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999097841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80962825,0.00029090885,0.00003766343,0.01782432,0.00035849414,0.00041748965,9.0200894e-7,0.000008641125,0.17143336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961259,0.0003814561,0.0012556273,0.000041654348,0.00055856793,0.000100060366,0.000015657497,0.0000068442228,0.0015142458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723333,0.0010134326,0.0001626903,0.00025043916,0.0011492481,0.0001908342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975659,0.0011278385,0.00010323207,0.000112221845,0.0009923022,0.00009850336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080978675,0.00006090586,0.00007149443,0.00034689778,0.0009569364,0.000092860784,0.00007147019,0.00007723358,0.00022610315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009838794,0.000061389415,0.0000132906525,0.00040271535,0.0003118079,0.000493875,0.000017472217,0.0002854301,0.00003925623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027497072,0.0009108479,0.01290311,0.0000398993,0.000043074786,6.787134e-8,0.034670893,0.00023707168,0.0118505005,0.81286323,0.0019513058,0.124255046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052231207,0.0007030726,0.17145751,0.00009052442,0.000024279543,0.0000031724353,0.0068348744,0.00008994309,0.0024557349,0.79674995,0.020935021,0.00013358977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016489121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005804764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18649766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006935991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013810102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004698653","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2012.704171","title":"An interdisciplinary analysis of microteaching evaluation forms: how peer feedback forms shape what constitutes “good teaching”","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Microteaching; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Presentation (obstetrics); Teaching method; Peer feedback; Qualitative research; Qualitative property; Psychology; Sample (material); Peer assessment; Perception; Session (web analytics); Pedagogy; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.37915352348574416,"score_gpt":0.5708644718789562,"score_spread":0.191710948393212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004698653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90165144,0.0027578012,0.00005941181,0.08699906,0.00042181334,0.0007842378,0.000008264445,0.000013955256,0.007304005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971227,0.00012975762,0.0004849828,0.00006503094,0.0006368547,0.00026039718,0.00048195943,0.00000950939,0.0008088218],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407595,0.0019716097,0.0002831868,0.00031548133,0.0028371974,0.0005165559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958319,0.0011631837,0.00016592334,0.00024252674,0.0023053898,0.00029108455],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031315885,0.00013104852,0.00020793501,0.0008182371,0.0015174011,0.00044648894,0.00024283577,0.00010931964,0.0015157008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045902636,0.00011760338,0.000084580555,0.00085790356,0.0006228106,0.0034901858,0.0000763778,0.00038442924,0.000022328346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052413823,0.0012687204,0.15196285,0.00003723102,0.00052437745,2.1754676e-8,0.60353607,0.000050239993,0.00061459077,0.05547159,0.0039705425,0.18251134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028092193,0.00008507004,0.3855582,0.000051325664,0.0003432044,5.5098116e-7,0.5987926,0.0032059792,0.000050851075,0.008851834,0.0026245562,0.00015492254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003218938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012023281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23359534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061810785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013728174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019696548","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383499","title":"Cross-Case Study of Self-Regulated Learning as a Series of Events","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Self-regulated learning; Psychology; Mathematics education; Construct (python library); Adaptation (eye); Strengths and weaknesses; Exploratory research; Test (biology); Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.279952846329902,"score_gpt":0.6007857704695032,"score_spread":0.3208329241396012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019696548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99574226,0.00011672487,0.000033681885,0.00037531546,0.00015260204,0.00042887987,9.515286e-7,0.000010237455,0.0031393538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99619013,0.0000018426738,0.0008238713,0.0000038925423,0.00008362954,0.00008423717,0.000019947562,0.000009616646,0.0027828547],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624175,0.0023153618,0.0002850917,0.0002214454,0.0007594069,0.00017697323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972855,0.0006599219,0.00013716242,0.00015703394,0.0017143826,0.000046008892],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011038301,0.000068673646,0.000117880045,0.0003146901,0.00030321238,0.000017012748,0.00007465991,0.00005599167,0.0012780799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002923076,0.00006533916,0.000016602955,0.0005596936,0.00012722475,0.000113442744,0.000032029162,0.00037513944,0.000030242838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007868014,0.0070217825,0.6774561,0.000097456636,0.0004459697,0.000014733731,0.25107825,0.0032327073,0.0044139046,0.02616762,0.00021734716,0.029067371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019454136,0.0025093239,0.9437311,0.000039176604,0.000021352991,0.00013023126,0.030215237,0.00007803579,0.00033277075,0.020781187,0.00013636723,0.000079792655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018547197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027829308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26627505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009073636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050893944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027477741","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383479","title":"Students' Experiences With Good and Poor University Courses","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill-Queen's University Press","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Psychology; Coding (social sciences); Context (archaeology); Teaching method; Pedagogy; Sample (material); Sociology","score_opus":0.2813300470844611,"score_gpt":0.5690290472988807,"score_spread":0.28769900021441963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027477741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95285213,0.0002707249,0.000016228141,0.036516625,0.00007003811,0.00033070723,0.0000010578169,0.000008571798,0.009933932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633175,0.00016671247,0.00054752437,0.000035335357,0.00014214701,0.00002802193,0.000008834833,0.0000029392636,0.002736722],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968658,0.00068115327,0.000063901585,0.0001729028,0.002043339,0.00017289123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981869,0.0008516438,0.00004753512,0.00006555459,0.0007105874,0.00013780751],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006565021,0.000045546705,0.000046565823,0.00013434653,0.0013390887,0.00019728934,0.00014293604,0.000032379645,0.0005360152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020241681,0.000041866264,0.000005974333,0.00026231824,0.00056940544,0.0006968028,0.000035512963,0.00012443472,0.000025282638],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002668712,0.00097421877,0.20350224,0.00002066017,0.00007508001,0.0000012525624,0.38987082,0.000119550845,0.000117481206,0.3855625,0.0022531324,0.017236197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010364196,0.00032332714,0.32936454,0.00005547358,0.000026081878,0.0000030480867,0.63751996,0.000042158736,0.000039379946,0.0149444565,0.016515018,0.00013015578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030942813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022926934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37061805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025756125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019559595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058115470","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383539","title":"Acquisition of Complex Systemic Thinking: Mental Models of Evolution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Similarity (geometry); Complex adaptive system; Pathfinder; Complex system; Mental model; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Biology","score_opus":0.377250872500605,"score_gpt":0.43980211710321165,"score_spread":0.06255124460260664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058115470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97376573,0.00056138355,0.00038351092,0.0040940624,0.00041837472,0.00047105085,0.000023435792,0.0000066186685,0.020275824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862707,0.00002895426,0.00027754696,0.000017150396,0.0002603079,0.00005079945,0.00016450914,0.0000042804927,0.0005694082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806195,0.00014870454,0.00027568985,0.00016183198,0.0012039341,0.00014787236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978923,0.00013401335,0.00012040452,0.000116951465,0.0016781753,0.000058128237],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023815704,0.000058313435,0.000090195244,0.00030674887,0.0003971051,0.00004872895,0.00010953094,0.000028468769,0.0012968172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016368764,0.0000542384,0.000026248821,0.00014408003,0.00045886158,0.00049365853,0.000023358863,0.00007499721,0.00002372131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022867873,0.00022792809,0.00030207165,0.000047060308,0.0000078851035,7.1625825e-9,0.025490709,0.00077060575,0.005726559,0.9654474,0.0016496861,0.00030719995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062421284,0.0002465487,0.024086729,0.0001796695,0.000013444693,0.000005505068,0.0229247,0.009787199,0.000537893,0.9412178,0.00028090258,0.00009541723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059984607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000156374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024861304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036504905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088890526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058526604","doi":"10.1080/13803610600587008","title":"Variation in socioeconomic gradients among cantons in French- and Italian-speaking Switzerland: Findings from the OECD PISA","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"German; Socioeconomic status; Variation (astronomy); Multilevel model; Inequality; Psychology; Literacy; Demography; Geography; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.08711754206741903,"score_gpt":0.41567619934483596,"score_spread":0.32855865727741695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058526604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98623466,0.00042617595,9.271267e-7,0.009789722,0.00015280597,0.00031176265,0.000007990876,0.000002461675,0.0030735077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865925,0.00016759394,0.000027235717,0.00003683118,0.00050997006,0.00008702375,0.000075288604,0.0000032628643,0.00043351567],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860895,0.00032223677,0.00015634771,0.00018649806,0.0004952168,0.00023073386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883956,0.0008940869,0.000037054935,0.00006743108,0.00011528174,0.00004660566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041765617,0.00004903298,0.000056715173,0.00014516235,0.0005075278,0.00016451904,0.000098350865,0.000055097353,0.0005940565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045978714,0.000043203727,0.000008716639,0.00016879207,0.0001696791,0.00045650342,0.000019007695,0.00017989434,0.000040358344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062406,0.000030936622,0.97821105,0.0000018792057,0.0000021509863,5.1429705e-8,0.016302636,0.000023078837,0.00005723737,0.0016648141,0.002397124,0.0013028112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026664976,0.000009895184,0.9587958,0.000022870241,0.0000020046537,9.1247024e-8,0.0016297104,0.0012454687,0.0000041206376,0.036996044,0.0009793504,0.00004802012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17903776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3741565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19511873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035811408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005823324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82642907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065172628","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2011.563087","title":"Studying for success: diaries of students' study behaviours","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Test (biology); Set (abstract data type); Academic achievement; Applied psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.641263373496236,"score_gpt":0.6376982019110164,"score_spread":0.0035651715852195176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065172628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932012,0.0001863842,0.00044220246,0.0002005532,0.00036220794,0.0011347268,0.0000054912775,0.0000061721094,0.004461073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955789,0.0000012838074,0.0017839967,0.0000082022325,0.0001449737,0.0007123459,0.000032564098,0.000010330884,0.0017274132],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965517,0.0019410019,0.00022710492,0.00024722525,0.0008226279,0.0002103584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968418,0.0015125307,0.00008535208,0.00017491358,0.0013392507,0.000046183493],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020662196,0.00006646706,0.00010873133,0.0002896278,0.00032338468,0.00003137997,0.0001757891,0.00003782203,0.0018339392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023734635,0.000060746068,0.000017928754,0.0002469168,0.00015293746,0.000083742656,0.000044074935,0.00022862088,0.000015115419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019545679,0.002264192,0.9049432,0.000008705206,0.000077955534,9.3772826e-8,0.061422583,7.848533e-7,0.00007195623,0.013437166,0.0011306083,0.016447255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007307596,0.0009949035,0.9691514,0.000010245344,0.000027657024,5.4626764e-7,0.019652164,0.000014273622,0.000051112555,0.009221873,0.000090478155,0.000054593173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074513664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041756346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06420815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005306917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020865577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066162995","doi":"10.1080/13803610902804382","title":"Factors influencing academic success and retention following a 1st-year post-secondary success course","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Youth Substance Use and School Attendance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Academic achievement; Coping (psychology); Impulsivity; Attendance; Anxiety; Openness to experience; Mental health; Disadvantaged; Developmental psychology; Study skills; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.1829247299426056,"score_gpt":0.48446176149228837,"score_spread":0.30153703154968275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066162995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98280036,0.0024086654,0.0000037683947,0.009872962,0.0002709564,0.00042469398,0.000007654675,0.000015339441,0.0041955877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982731,0.00036564615,0.00007228043,0.00012835991,0.000375844,0.000033173266,0.00007118585,0.000006164074,0.0006742752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970116,0.00048004783,0.00021544666,0.00033230215,0.0015530111,0.00040759376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981955,0.0005287392,0.000071353046,0.00010947974,0.00085010484,0.0002447822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054293335,0.000096182266,0.00011260003,0.00019305266,0.0012420996,0.0002312148,0.00017166742,0.00012427248,0.00040122776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017272978,0.00009196052,0.000033464694,0.00045801618,0.00018866976,0.0012444571,0.000023071545,0.00046205684,0.000019026442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007228324,0.0000993481,0.91020703,0.000027983879,0.000031611846,8.130766e-7,0.037786506,0.000007722356,0.00246417,0.016592529,0.0023510724,0.030358903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027888574,0.00006978837,0.9581619,0.00007293336,0.000016297952,3.5841333e-7,0.01299337,0.00006410082,0.00006106214,0.02780798,0.00036240084,0.00011093732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008479932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008369273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047954828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021942309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016730907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95533514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066424609","doi":"10.1080/13803610512331383469","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on Postsecondary Instruction: The Old Science of Phrenology and the New Science of College Teaching","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Ideological and Political Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Phrenology; Science education; Mathematics education; Postsecondary education; Pseudoscience; Psychology; Higher education; Medicine; Political science; Alternative medicine; Law","score_opus":0.08567639787092902,"score_gpt":0.4682868208877472,"score_spread":0.3826104230168182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066424609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5963643,0.000055043605,0.0000028159977,0.38970336,0.00063714193,0.00040474435,0.0000020772643,0.0000013155133,0.012829166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894889,0.000033183645,0.00014624298,0.00026813336,0.008654369,0.00003218084,0.0000019998047,0.0000015093034,0.0013734718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974752,0.00047930097,0.0001698058,0.00022072472,0.0014083051,0.0002466453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756753,0.0010990527,0.00006165127,0.00016874894,0.0009860146,0.0001169789],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01454109,0.00004591409,0.000069898044,0.00018316855,0.0024497316,0.000082151804,0.00034670645,0.000029930443,0.00059960777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016394483,0.000023659766,0.000013366745,0.0010672825,0.007197023,0.00023960772,0.0000758683,0.00024063422,0.000020442654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078750505,0.00004588032,0.000050081995,0.0000024131778,0.000002052469,5.357211e-9,0.013649546,0.000050964998,0.00031695265,0.95383334,0.006451887,0.02551815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007202161,0.00038464647,0.11758197,0.000024146797,0.00001247885,0.000006094659,0.024075193,0.00007620987,0.0021306844,0.80186933,0.053046778,0.00007222902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026586407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037041758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39312458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024074277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004764014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072781869","doi":"10.1076/edre.7.2.223.3863","title":"Developing a Computer-Assisted Tutoring Program to Help Children at Risk Learn to Read","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministère de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport Québec","keywords":"Formative assessment; Computer-Assisted Instruction; Computer science; Reading (process); Class (philosophy); Social constructivism; Quality (philosophy); Mathematics education; Program evaluation; Multimedia; Medical education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.28325707540413153,"score_gpt":0.5312908933485849,"score_spread":0.2480338179444534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072781869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.966164,0.000112114074,0.00008558046,0.027660526,0.00018450216,0.0009864857,0.0000019932577,0.000023026038,0.0047818054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793089,0.00031118537,0.0074366736,0.00021563125,0.0030313388,0.00062285917,0.000080000835,0.000010098455,0.008983338],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974714,0.00038170317,0.00013675366,0.00027112456,0.0013162816,0.00042273683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982717,0.00038957206,0.000032242016,0.000117289346,0.0008675954,0.00032161793],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048012813,0.000063294574,0.000065999106,0.00021889019,0.0014283047,0.00021743751,0.00015999835,0.000045995574,0.00058010087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019568447,0.00006394812,0.000014979137,0.0009389966,0.00008180686,0.00022476571,0.00008129884,0.00015192413,0.00054400245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058008205,0.00009317135,0.41749218,0.0000048128045,0.000012695823,1.2140708e-7,0.006325831,0.00009613183,0.000026034328,0.0011123713,0.013471631,0.561307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013836131,0.00014445664,0.905765,0.000043629756,0.000003728862,0.0000016267052,0.0006380117,0.00033064836,0.000016627617,0.0010100461,0.09181935,0.00008849427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003592763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068709315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5612185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076035823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012328224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145422031","doi":"10.1076/edre.7.2.185.3869","title":"Technology Integration for Students with Disabilities: Empirically Based Recommendations for Faculty","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Adaptation (eye); Sample (material); Medical education; Psychology; Assistive technology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Medicine; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.44902564159165687,"score_gpt":0.6137609149944456,"score_spread":0.16473527340278876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145422031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8532913,0.0000391671,0.0022670946,0.1350694,0.00011649569,0.003174385,0.00014282999,0.000028106104,0.0058712414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841739,0.00001085807,0.004764524,0.00007685303,0.00019121481,0.0045192414,0.0010971817,0.000009391966,0.005156832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979825,0.0001690804,0.00020816429,0.00031534772,0.0010101625,0.00031475734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938026,0.0031344316,0.00004986731,0.00014679285,0.002761515,0.000104763356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042328984,0.00007681375,0.00009034335,0.00022062835,0.0009717458,0.00032639524,0.00022890764,0.000072766685,0.00051090645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014379787,0.00006543986,0.000030790172,0.0005640338,0.0007460564,0.00058062637,0.000024000747,0.00008559281,0.0000094204115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083571876,0.0028788557,0.42029086,0.00011608506,0.000064080064,2.2001512e-8,0.017144024,0.000045281107,0.000046407902,0.32948342,0.04594315,0.1831521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011655249,0.00085976935,0.02873165,0.00007234331,0.000021347165,3.839263e-7,0.08579426,0.0014828106,0.000057695972,0.7946508,0.086987756,0.00017565816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024381158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039741136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46516737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005599523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015701227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99392253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093238068","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2020.1830119","title":"Effective numeracy educational interventions for students from disadvantaged social background: a comparison of two teaching methods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Mathematics education; Socioeconomic status; Numeracy; Subtraction; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Teaching method; Social constructivism; Mastery learning; Social studies; Pedagogy; Mathematics; Medicine; Population; Literacy","score_opus":0.36217738808249983,"score_gpt":0.6742622103928949,"score_spread":0.3120848223103951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093238068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98753065,0.00018710051,0.0061267763,0.0016158597,0.00020317131,0.0020373608,0.000055538363,0.00000560867,0.0022379134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92043066,0.000002403303,0.07722922,0.000014347482,0.00025369812,0.00065953785,0.00037274027,0.0000141856835,0.0010232165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714035,0.00084704906,0.00044176672,0.00029387456,0.0010654279,0.00021151364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797677,0.018973172,0.00016654452,0.00011268771,0.0009024015,0.00007749023],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005676711,0.00011316796,0.00027553973,0.0001732831,0.00035256858,0.00008769799,0.00017109758,0.00004368048,0.0020946795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060376725,0.000103962106,0.0001073294,0.00014150077,0.000095062795,0.00023783355,0.00011944177,0.00023900704,0.000072119496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005792561,0.013288587,0.08273414,0.0014708982,0.00087766664,6.125653e-8,0.023895113,0.000006288928,0.011241527,0.66422117,0.0147860395,0.18689929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011747666,0.00016789197,0.14237374,0.0003075711,0.000055740333,4.3144382e-7,0.0026145428,0.0007684712,0.0008508827,0.8515108,0.00006793185,0.000107198444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006168377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033716482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18728969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000251828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027734277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138121929","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2021.1902354","title":"Linking personality to teachers’ literacy in classroom assessment: a cross-cultural study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Summative assessment; Formative assessment; Psychology; Literacy; Competence (human resources); Personality; Pedagogy; Big Five personality traits; Empathy; Mathematics education; Social psychology","score_opus":0.3451683761205265,"score_gpt":0.6177916604486202,"score_spread":0.27262328432809374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138121929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94579124,0.00008685523,0.000006110958,0.034674983,0.000114377784,0.0010386071,0.0000023977072,0.000008689523,0.018276747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973008,0.000015978392,0.00041064274,0.00017834677,0.00082546595,0.00024464767,0.000042053398,0.0000050850667,0.0009769781],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598855,0.0010107084,0.00020050327,0.0003464323,0.0021269675,0.00032681343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979138,0.0006380613,0.000035489968,0.00007600218,0.0010893929,0.00024725628],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072262613,0.00007393266,0.00009562528,0.0001254399,0.0006990921,0.00078900915,0.00020713097,0.000045075154,0.0012701683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022940726,0.00007151397,0.000021584885,0.00081726594,0.00013979748,0.0007060949,0.00008402336,0.00031133124,0.00008254984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002413306,0.0002702442,0.80486053,0.0000042623833,0.000008065348,2.4367787e-7,0.18618186,0.000008242295,0.00007859927,0.002309792,0.00092388125,0.0053301468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005006884,0.00016715395,0.9386687,0.000015587433,0.0000044086596,6.134508e-8,0.053355854,0.0005311088,0.0000011470805,0.002368171,0.004310113,0.0000769745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00126924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010935996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13380821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051204144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012011823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404492912","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2024.2424351","title":"Learning outcomes as perceived enjoyment in studying accounting – personal & environmental factors","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Accounting Education and Careers","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Accounting; Business","score_opus":0.14882427181464222,"score_gpt":0.40999232881525255,"score_spread":0.2611680570006103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404492912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870617,0.00044002282,0.000003444394,0.005314361,0.0005521878,0.0003973716,0.0000014865103,0.000032394237,0.0061970237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950878,0.00003081307,0.000030650477,0.00021457368,0.00078488595,0.00014390226,0.00044173884,0.000023437966,0.0032422156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974828,0.000070678914,0.00023494706,0.00041452234,0.0014407415,0.0003563324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990273,0.0005662343,0.000052415875,0.00009279561,0.0002326043,0.000028658846],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003087705,0.00014772713,0.000114711074,0.00077176245,0.00048554598,0.00091983983,0.0001272091,0.000058369304,0.004597099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016751151,0.00013591211,0.000040653747,0.00057313155,0.000091553964,0.0011498004,0.000103890656,0.00042330616,0.0008877122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015147616,0.00020778744,0.9735955,0.00010093956,0.000033639193,5.794767e-7,0.005065392,0.00007038466,0.001084568,0.0024604588,0.0038211856,0.013544389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022203803,0.000012947691,0.9513288,0.00008604258,0.000017680024,0.0000013574178,0.018708853,0.0063740597,0.0000042336583,0.0026602857,0.020420093,0.00016360197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006942631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014342889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02226672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044535464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031460988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414618650","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2025.2562417","title":"Exploring research-related knowledge and attitudes: a study among university students in Lebanon","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Research and Evaluation","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Qatar National Library","keywords":"Knowledge level; Qualitative research; Research methodology; Data collection; Statistical analysis; Higher education","score_opus":0.4192136329234551,"score_gpt":0.5727066749372391,"score_spread":0.15349304201378405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414618650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863063,0.00044222525,0.000002499479,0.0045950655,0.0002172218,0.0016725864,5.7158775e-7,0.00000834563,0.006755174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99371165,0.0002062962,0.000093644696,0.000014254682,0.00008320332,0.00023415533,0.00004750273,0.000006676237,0.005602645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967941,0.0008104537,0.0002516671,0.0003880176,0.0014658377,0.00028990195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677444,0.00081343093,0.000027137252,0.00022103604,0.002069753,0.00009422314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013000874,0.000077388555,0.00012942488,0.0018757646,0.0004414269,0.000060347862,0.0001297787,0.000066735505,0.00020282934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057865814,0.0000801096,0.000010738255,0.0028308441,0.00037436033,0.00032134235,0.00016365963,0.00070590666,0.000031013213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011601046,0.00257221,0.9610161,0.000096767835,0.000048739206,0.0000014832578,0.006511525,0.0000029374191,0.00008773788,0.0034871409,0.003688932,0.02237039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017044551,0.0002550608,0.9787715,0.00034237158,0.000018844046,0.000001320008,0.015152037,0.00081500114,0.00001436544,0.002161327,0.0007118606,0.000051829706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003603672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003536799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02231856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009863202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016597824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6927496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}