{"meta":{"query_hash":"114f9f82ddfd","filters":{"venue":"Electoral Studies"},"cohort_total":69,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":69,"exported":69,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/114f9f82ddfd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Electoral+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1163814443","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.08.006","title":"Regional variation in voter turnout in Europe: The impact of corruption perceptions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Language change; Legislature; Ballot; Political science; Socioeconomic status; Government (linguistics); Multilevel model; Perception; Voter turnout; Politics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Economics; Voting; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.14657867767999405,"score_gpt":0.40247721569096184,"score_spread":0.2558985380109678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1163814443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982712,0.00038834068,0.00006196863,0.000072916824,0.000009076649,0.0000012535328,0.00018956976,0.0000020430612,0.0010035587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994999,0.00006894381,0.000013822771,0.000010159189,0.0000077741515,6.3245756e-7,0.00019052197,0.0000027831693,0.00020541286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863523,0.0005551272,0.000093810486,0.00026865661,0.000114830866,0.00033226464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963283,0.0012497427,0.0010024107,0.00036459323,0.0006167882,0.00043816032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019588359,0.00015699642,0.00040655563,0.0015195264,0.00030810857,0.0012961298,0.00033855555,0.00046036908,0.002909019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044473726,0.00012978507,0.00053615676,0.0016044237,0.00045453123,0.000574139,0.00085659255,0.00037957772,0.00040594593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035975504,0.00005124107,0.9924697,0.000026921896,0.00029045192,0.00011846641,0.0010943178,0.00043618132,0.0004027871,0.00050284277,0.00039108624,0.003856277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022341985,0.000020448977,0.9988041,0.000007062241,0.00002396416,0.00003026489,0.00058280694,0.00008285952,0.00006064173,0.000027444457,0.00035555486,0.0000026793998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0110158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01658662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0110158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003269634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002366445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021903396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967434382","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2009.07.001","title":"Political judgments, perceptions of facts, and partisan effects","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; University of New Brunswick; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Perception; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Axiom; Test (biology); Political science; Psychology; Positive economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.042026198161703145,"score_gpt":0.4143547376118129,"score_spread":0.37232853945010974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967434382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829003,0.0003192387,0.0003447592,0.00030860427,0.000037755224,0.0000105861245,0.00005097857,0.0000054573306,0.01602247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992224,0.00013593116,0.000103584876,0.000051699095,0.00004302165,0.000005885639,0.000054467615,0.0000057678603,0.00037724982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728143,0.0014246205,0.0001672143,0.0002943091,0.0006322855,0.000200061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.914499,0.06879644,0.008347406,0.0029939045,0.002757375,0.0026058953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069857715,0.00036541402,0.00041667718,0.001792713,0.00139074,0.0033718422,0.00036038316,0.0009284755,0.009673277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057895143,0.00036911285,0.00032182198,0.001064013,0.0018095606,0.0018862968,0.001365584,0.0014055328,0.00047476962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009514226,0.003295476,0.8491494,0.0005410702,0.0009978361,0.0005017116,0.023969853,0.0019467522,0.014728524,0.023104453,0.0027175716,0.06953317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015348036,0.00046171647,0.9787193,0.000056376393,0.00028766703,0.00017649213,0.006579871,0.0016424995,0.0012108296,0.008908761,0.0017574329,0.000045595647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001945341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039653387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009673277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005194826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030066707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036944747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985106340","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.03.008","title":"A rational or a virtuous citizenry? – The asymmetric impact of biases in votes-seats translation on citizens' satisfaction with democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normative; Respondent; Democracy; Voting; Political science; Antipathy; Politics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.2344208997091653,"score_gpt":0.44239847357018675,"score_spread":0.20797757386102145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985106340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98168945,0.00015468962,0.0011000119,0.0029399379,0.000029477455,0.000010444961,0.0001510705,0.000008384522,0.013916432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993749,0.00002734714,0.00009074686,0.0001123924,0.000021075535,0.000003668192,0.000034868848,0.000007531754,0.00032749397],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885794,0.008001,0.00048777892,0.00072466955,0.0014423062,0.0007648351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.871195,0.09291483,0.017048256,0.011418597,0.004818473,0.0026048953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015314334,0.00016384204,0.0005078449,0.0009217462,0.0010262097,0.0039577675,0.00046933585,0.0010433209,0.018012801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08200909,0.0002479382,0.00042804846,0.001648793,0.0034311023,0.0026851783,0.0018087563,0.0014078559,0.0012760564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004248152,0.00088986167,0.81392837,0.00021394862,0.0005526433,0.00023634525,0.014304878,0.0013363642,0.003092265,0.043922365,0.002502149,0.11477267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001312049,0.00046534016,0.94392663,0.00007446805,0.0001719827,0.00018863133,0.012573413,0.002478421,0.0018938741,0.034576576,0.003478096,0.000041357926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012224365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015742643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018012801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007813322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070915086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08099097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000281270","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.007","title":"Referendums and deliberative democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Deliberative democracy; Deliberation; Political science; Democracy; Politics; CLARITY; Direct democracy; Brexit; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; European union; Economics","score_opus":0.28293941586392385,"score_gpt":0.4545444389521537,"score_spread":0.17160502308822984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000281270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59253246,0.002124557,0.011562287,0.0109402435,0.00020800307,0.000069927584,0.00014839048,0.00004895014,0.38236517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949986,0.00013640439,0.00040443466,0.00013062452,0.000050248083,0.000020138497,0.000023567718,0.000006239174,0.00422976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889537,0.008261416,0.00026255203,0.0008385955,0.0007101348,0.00097351585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97823936,0.014511434,0.0027632767,0.0022368266,0.0010936108,0.0011553995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011873848,0.00026355925,0.0004655227,0.0029897287,0.004818916,0.00656978,0.0010288135,0.0015617158,0.013761801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027024569,0.00022971864,0.00026042992,0.0040237294,0.010407818,0.004113891,0.0035588664,0.0015876922,0.00064675196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091225585,0.00012524538,0.007783916,0.00006145654,0.000022399732,0.00008799323,0.0156593,0.00033416128,0.00017246269,0.95950985,0.0009396737,0.015212301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007705509,0.00013060881,0.019092074,0.00010429262,0.000028108152,0.00010395421,0.02653854,0.0011374556,0.00079516286,0.92301726,0.028959246,0.000016243443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011724071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017512792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013761801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016427258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016594399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06279564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004014127","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.013","title":"The impact of motivational and contextual factors on turnout in first- and second-order elections","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Turnout; Competition (biology); Voting; Political science; Order (exchange); Salient; Voter turnout; Politics; Political economy; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.11988491388459145,"score_gpt":0.38825762167622296,"score_spread":0.2683727077916315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004014127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99841976,0.00007496217,0.000026769989,0.00007739964,0.0000061085934,0.000004900563,0.000031001648,0.0000015024846,0.0013576822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995888,0.000023609073,0.000014808302,0.000009571404,0.0000053273347,0.0000035428793,0.000034291785,0.0000015001351,0.00031855472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866414,0.0006255761,0.000042558528,0.00009504277,0.000077114775,0.0004956248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99135876,0.004098113,0.0011167771,0.00026584888,0.0004271511,0.0027333535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022476998,0.00020861658,0.0004497641,0.00075746933,0.0013673524,0.0024137902,0.0003476198,0.00067713065,0.0066114017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00933882,0.00020500962,0.0003563005,0.0006288592,0.000659045,0.00055230124,0.0011823069,0.0008244008,0.00046247285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029850504,0.0016507206,0.9755186,0.000051935043,0.00017444213,0.00015301695,0.0035050358,0.00042015564,0.001702792,0.0020141974,0.00038987573,0.011434289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017268489,0.00019041871,0.99661833,0.000006247091,0.000030703868,0.000018005052,0.0022006964,0.0001755153,0.00015729506,0.00029766205,0.00028259048,0.000005319401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007939312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025746772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007939312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007249708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073148316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022117376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004949851","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.11.007","title":"Political knowledge, the decision calculus, and proximity voting","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Ballot; Bullet voting; Cardinal voting systems; Focus (optics); Disapproval voting; Politics; Process (computing); Decision process; Political science; Computer science; Voting behavior; Social psychology; Public relations; Psychology; Economics; Management science; Law","score_opus":0.07962281699408218,"score_gpt":0.40970583094881274,"score_spread":0.33008301395473055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004949851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79050267,0.0018375843,0.04438111,0.008158941,0.0001182674,0.00009301897,0.00027910498,0.00005445281,0.15457484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966348,0.00016803821,0.0009400276,0.00005536267,0.00005470156,0.000015365964,0.000030077694,0.0000044996164,0.002097166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932707,0.0037677025,0.00031811098,0.00085506495,0.000900387,0.0008880507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9396423,0.05040082,0.0043290677,0.002589001,0.0014423958,0.001596375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010040498,0.00031600308,0.0009965303,0.0028351303,0.0026914428,0.007727849,0.00101154,0.0018125431,0.015554502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05217677,0.0003137301,0.00059801154,0.0033851874,0.0077353255,0.0070554786,0.0030506297,0.0018641026,0.0006022376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034344735,0.0003618854,0.02194975,0.00014865103,0.00010696807,0.00016354921,0.0040086736,0.0069860597,0.0002969814,0.923374,0.0010823425,0.04117766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057360186,0.00006187924,0.0101701,0.000039379716,0.00005847339,0.00006582765,0.0016540369,0.009117519,0.00025863768,0.9757112,0.0027811541,0.000024489811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046655876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004155115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015554502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021793551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020141313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05309981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027604014","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.030","title":"Electoral accountability in the developing world","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Accountability; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.15664327050040294,"score_gpt":0.433581351244147,"score_spread":0.27693808074374404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027604014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95880514,0.0010273055,0.0003949967,0.0071487874,0.00004605726,0.000012180471,0.00027124188,0.0000073385204,0.03228692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986203,0.0002738374,0.000027422822,0.0000581253,0.000023480332,0.0000042059996,0.000038440725,0.0000018847761,0.00095235347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782515,0.0011457889,0.0000703875,0.00009665212,0.0002511962,0.0006107449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921672,0.0040798252,0.001738068,0.00026763816,0.0011038212,0.0006434299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037917602,0.00011288185,0.0002496963,0.0028350614,0.0023163788,0.0022109656,0.00031634822,0.0004247546,0.0056373733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016034925,0.00010978828,0.0001041871,0.006017866,0.002438936,0.0017012609,0.0015292072,0.00090916164,0.000262693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023068838,0.00020727204,0.7670743,0.0001588269,0.0000511591,0.0003341976,0.029097462,0.0012717729,0.0002521073,0.10831462,0.0060920264,0.08691563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019503384,0.000099734316,0.9142995,0.00012405061,0.000026322077,0.00017652377,0.042254787,0.0015604836,0.00034268558,0.015914747,0.025162771,0.000018871808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035596065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060632065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035596065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00291697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036298975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070777774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039598650","doi":"10.1016/s0261-3794(00)00003-2","title":"Pre-election polls and the dynamics of the 1997 Canadian federal election","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Arts Research Board, McMaster University","keywords":"Political science; Federal election; General election; Polling; Period (music); National election; Primary election; Public administration; Political economy; Politics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03345169477113066,"score_gpt":0.3426728749619733,"score_spread":0.30922118019084266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039598650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8979311,0.0027151043,0.00036821343,0.021405723,0.00026293052,0.00013353153,0.003485043,0.000047476202,0.073650874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814734,0.0007341801,0.000115099516,0.00053955446,0.0000791866,0.00004488937,0.0009952103,0.000021211195,0.01599717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959292,0.00051401515,0.00008573319,0.00022709572,0.0012980874,0.0019459032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814858,0.0052920976,0.0018516096,0.0003882967,0.007920679,0.003061599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077626184,0.00036931632,0.0007089116,0.0055422643,0.008981014,0.0072169313,0.0017214663,0.001880643,0.014946272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035578348,0.0005204761,0.0003420982,0.0076428168,0.0024762128,0.0021942966,0.0021378337,0.0025645103,0.0010528574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028975492,0.00063642545,0.53000605,0.00049970666,0.00025213987,0.0004028435,0.056780234,0.0041964087,0.0012123531,0.1305193,0.121370465,0.1512265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043955,0.000050066326,0.91825634,0.00008507811,0.000032696873,0.000016718188,0.022427825,0.0012139914,0.00022874768,0.0019263747,0.05565969,0.000058496975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071549535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071549535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06603779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51913065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048424507","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2006.01.001","title":"An experimental comparison of question forms used to reduce vote overreporting","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Communication in Education and Healthcare","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Michigan","keywords":"Turnout; Sample (material); Face (sociological concept); Voter turnout; Psychology; National election; Political science; Social psychology; Voting; Law; Sociology; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.19259257316120723,"score_gpt":0.5568222792902369,"score_spread":0.3642297061290296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048424507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927094,0.00028535887,0.0017611703,0.00022875018,0.00036827737,0.0020006944,0.0001682245,0.00006796962,0.0024101506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827885,0.00037566456,0.007719315,0.00040412886,0.00026577327,0.0050617163,0.00018179521,0.00006026538,0.0031427564],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.98470205,0.0104284445,0.001911938,0.0011264941,0.0012858639,0.0005451195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85624963,0.12424326,0.0074218847,0.0066630743,0.0024693569,0.0029527706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011202783,0.0012098114,0.0018286278,0.0011233109,0.0011526472,0.0017569906,0.0013583377,0.002644193,0.0154390205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0796965,0.00105875,0.0012086793,0.000711045,0.0016902923,0.002129818,0.0015041792,0.0022735137,0.0013519259],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.44778877,0.3371811,0.008232512,0.003155034,0.0012303941,0.00015774432,0.0058513796,0.001447288,0.018995773,0.004130683,0.0019574645,0.16987194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.17399827,0.7182326,0.058365915,0.0006870908,0.0032806399,0.00025554645,0.003439306,0.0074195727,0.019060628,0.005706087,0.009259128,0.0002952356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004994603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006767262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0154390205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006035362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013497324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05924666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058796927","doi":"10.1016/s0261-3794(00)00018-4","title":"Sovereignty, leadership and voting in the Quebec referendums","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Referendum; Political science; Voting; Sovereignty; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.20693039001311236,"score_gpt":0.37249968809396194,"score_spread":0.16556929808084958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058796927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97264785,0.0007482571,0.00013216381,0.0019109903,0.000017189186,0.000016310445,0.00038103436,0.000004898853,0.024141302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932202,0.00015911485,0.000041261035,0.000079793776,0.0000046073997,0.000006952515,0.0001002181,0.0000026067655,0.0063851117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896777,0.00032144604,0.000023818926,0.00008852135,0.00014108689,0.00045732863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964056,0.0013920609,0.00048251142,0.0001150046,0.0009738432,0.00063103833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019380418,0.00015117595,0.000414065,0.0016806329,0.0070605488,0.0031645151,0.0008679533,0.0006515268,0.009554858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006960621,0.00012142709,0.00019840541,0.0039548418,0.0025910323,0.0010106007,0.00088286534,0.0012681077,0.00030312221],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047876374,0.00037143877,0.79038876,0.000088707864,0.000121111516,0.0003843502,0.03634189,0.0026379386,0.00048317813,0.09622321,0.015138233,0.05734239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038955357,0.000060415274,0.9492593,0.00006301023,0.000050642313,0.000034956578,0.026065646,0.0027921398,0.00017108872,0.0026334936,0.018797975,0.00003238877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99016434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03509503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03509503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01950524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25463343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064286289","doi":"10.1016/s0261-3794(99)00061-x","title":"Declining cleavages and political choices: the interplay of social and political factors in the Netherlands","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Voting; Voting behavior; Political economy; Loyalty; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Test (biology); Development economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.13557227588566617,"score_gpt":0.45629697132485847,"score_spread":0.3207246954391923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064286289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925761,0.00041745589,0.000074041855,0.00053266884,0.000008602197,0.0000046599134,0.00011882071,6.248586e-7,0.006267045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979551,0.0001662501,0.000027998414,0.000024571422,0.0000038617713,0.0000042205497,0.00007118865,0.0000034435795,0.0017434862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998156,0.00064091,0.00008763246,0.00021662247,0.0001955659,0.00070329197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969522,0.0012610812,0.00074227457,0.0001231924,0.0003480969,0.0005731151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021339129,0.00010057571,0.00045164375,0.0012603663,0.0012827299,0.0037506516,0.00076072384,0.000716274,0.008087581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009061497,0.00024390049,0.0002174022,0.0027371568,0.001674035,0.0017790012,0.0014593794,0.0009661295,0.0005439728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008650955,0.00037779188,0.83146226,0.00016235329,0.0001850171,0.0015346957,0.07069197,0.0021463463,0.0007167375,0.04303275,0.0036015825,0.045223396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005097753,0.0000450413,0.9125229,0.00009241258,0.00006434792,0.0002447437,0.064102404,0.001622432,0.00024846182,0.0056355675,0.015338642,0.000031993302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24590047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39484176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24590047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036617646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021478892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48893833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065842283","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2009.02.003","title":"The federal election in Canada, October 2008","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Racialization; Presidential election; Political science; White (mutation); Politics; National election; Presidential system; Affect (linguistics); General election; Gender studies; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.04926785578757985,"score_gpt":0.36217780891106577,"score_spread":0.3129099531234859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065842283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.468723,0.019745085,0.0005268393,0.24436559,0.008657851,0.00038107904,0.0616759,0.00029789523,0.19562681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66734606,0.004476033,0.0003959601,0.01161075,0.00085740123,0.00010834956,0.009946964,0.00010057067,0.30515784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960594,0.00016754093,0.000110090004,0.00021518265,0.0013360694,0.0021117786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99392855,0.00027838748,0.00025044472,0.00008449547,0.0038404777,0.0016176117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002305022,0.00036509108,0.00088307995,0.0031707047,0.016289331,0.0070260363,0.0015326119,0.0030916915,0.009013083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008495539,0.00051478384,0.00045042118,0.00606164,0.0015197644,0.0012979568,0.0018145476,0.0044971076,0.0011815199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004842913,0.00018982617,0.08958134,0.0002483064,0.000115085786,0.0003510837,0.0054460983,0.00070327823,0.00019896952,0.018550534,0.8448814,0.039249714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006623118,0.000040186376,0.42861754,0.00020011801,0.000057704598,0.0000651785,0.011819869,0.00045111356,0.0003395818,0.000712865,0.5575551,0.00007454018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99957174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13390566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13390566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17429017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97155815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067087535","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2008.07.007","title":"A general measure of district competitiveness","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Turnout; Margin (machine learning); Measure (data warehouse); General election; Variable (mathematics); Electoral system; Political science; Economic system; Economics; Business; Mathematics; Computer science; Voting; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.14356585341529682,"score_gpt":0.3898526955696818,"score_spread":0.24628684215438496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067087535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.588188,0.0011751592,0.04882283,0.001017784,0.00022479484,0.0004914229,0.013929128,0.00036698589,0.34578392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97800374,0.00020751302,0.008427923,0.000056803612,0.00008160124,0.00022488707,0.004037429,0.00003321193,0.008926871],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969193,0.0010677022,0.00023503206,0.00045962635,0.00087565096,0.0004427351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973947,0.0007597603,0.000468716,0.00029045786,0.00068647496,0.0003998224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020098868,0.0003839883,0.0008827333,0.0070889536,0.0010782476,0.0029938677,0.0008481903,0.00058293226,0.01629838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005624606,0.00013158246,0.0006293743,0.008992633,0.0013667503,0.0017062722,0.0020113029,0.0005920079,0.0013900859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030497968,0.00042981186,0.5042848,0.0007165947,0.00092036795,0.00020932061,0.0042133317,0.009409146,0.003753227,0.33352977,0.02244323,0.11978546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004594726,0.00042288392,0.8743482,0.00009743867,0.00016386258,0.00048530233,0.005688637,0.0049093883,0.0012915971,0.049133997,0.063350976,0.00006170768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044248393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010037011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01629838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016465756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013622877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054523528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076034436","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.09.010","title":"Scope conditions of economic voting: The Danish exception?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Scope (computer science); Danish; Economics; Positive economics; Generalizability theory; Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.08771620065684411,"score_gpt":0.41323408464544575,"score_spread":0.32551788398860165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076034436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9240507,0.004482356,0.0018678613,0.0032348149,0.00015585986,0.000024075958,0.0016748398,0.000016033382,0.06449347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855715,0.0002803916,0.00016316026,0.00007407197,0.000019387506,0.000005963597,0.00019765376,0.000006228103,0.0006959543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947172,0.0013086093,0.0007141722,0.001138239,0.00087475474,0.0012470783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814207,0.010780101,0.00222819,0.0023581649,0.001928154,0.0012846399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00524516,0.00021296978,0.0010143641,0.0020888587,0.001801322,0.004303041,0.0009029338,0.001100679,0.008919072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026924634,0.00031119265,0.0006957206,0.0020741373,0.0028483097,0.0031101126,0.0036003585,0.00094120926,0.00056089653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017871741,0.00019915123,0.52213573,0.0010663413,0.00044858904,0.0009453789,0.008831179,0.005155612,0.0027095107,0.37740567,0.007720868,0.07159473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101476224,0.00012586117,0.8833999,0.00032859427,0.00017680948,0.00048015892,0.019915145,0.0022696261,0.0010969602,0.07599407,0.016041301,0.00007017251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031854797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042500716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031854797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024807327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020715867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06333876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077013175","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2010.11.006","title":"Valence politics and economic crisis: Electoral choice in Canada 2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Political science; Politics; Political economy; Voting; Prime minister; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04178338393602016,"score_gpt":0.35226380440405,"score_spread":0.3104804204680298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077013175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888849,0.0004145632,0.000032238186,0.0036359148,0.00002535697,0.000016536767,0.0010524871,0.000004096824,0.0059338263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99055254,0.00019894948,0.00003065932,0.00021239773,0.000012109014,0.000007208446,0.0004403368,0.000005656717,0.00854015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830604,0.00021027881,0.000043018736,0.00011075337,0.00034525164,0.0009847749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959865,0.0004628395,0.00040347216,0.00007566168,0.001398541,0.0016729273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018322783,0.00018886733,0.0006626655,0.0019931288,0.0073427395,0.0039379275,0.0011436293,0.0013124406,0.009973484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005274377,0.00023251584,0.0004118267,0.004445629,0.0016530355,0.0010628393,0.0019238024,0.0023709948,0.0005242617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007663529,0.00034333192,0.9358547,0.00004861469,0.00007196381,0.00019430045,0.014404133,0.00056045444,0.00017085481,0.008794035,0.016823804,0.021967344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026509648,0.000030080588,0.9634111,0.000028619075,0.000020250522,0.000026437792,0.02268757,0.0006231625,0.00008853436,0.0003504642,0.012679423,0.000027923423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99834335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054850385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054850385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06222071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39796925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078433006","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2011.03.001","title":"Leaders, voters and activists in the elections in Great Britain 2005 and 2010","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Position (finance); Political science; General election; Political economy; Voting; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.21758756681720942,"score_gpt":0.3972908247296066,"score_spread":0.17970325791239716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078433006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99289906,0.0010109118,0.000028340231,0.0016068886,0.000052559193,0.000007927288,0.0006147014,0.0000029842138,0.0037766313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866807,0.00047772238,0.000024073184,0.0001934367,0.00006291719,0.000017041717,0.0007964568,0.0000054361494,0.011742324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807787,0.0005350291,0.00012593299,0.00017641857,0.0003120735,0.00077274075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958187,0.0008001195,0.0012592672,0.00008456255,0.00073590985,0.00130144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020189784,0.0001478317,0.00055704854,0.0019337198,0.0016505859,0.0020482137,0.0006151851,0.001077574,0.00357047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057612597,0.00034944178,0.00025381762,0.0034993824,0.0010810606,0.0011440761,0.0024388433,0.0016500722,0.0008072639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014079225,0.00026922638,0.8769091,0.00036538672,0.00017325432,0.00050959445,0.059095733,0.00046643842,0.0005848889,0.004799157,0.025591303,0.029828075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011370372,0.00003610431,0.9875979,0.000025143483,0.000014078199,0.000026035854,0.006262177,0.00007603826,0.000032615564,0.00005698197,0.0058549233,0.0000066968987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22797054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61605155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22797054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032001324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017850413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45328718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079127360","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.005","title":"Does low turnout matter? Evidence from the 2000 Canadian federal election","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal; McGill University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Turnout; Political science; Population; Demographic economics; Voter turnout; General election; Public administration; Economics; Voting; Demography; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04216701789567799,"score_gpt":0.3408536668405069,"score_spread":0.2986866489448289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079127360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8988109,0.013206971,0.00013879467,0.030598992,0.00025990792,0.000082690734,0.00860671,0.000018508179,0.04827644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846011,0.003321341,0.00005262655,0.0014672085,0.000123274,0.000017911363,0.0024172235,0.0000112268945,0.007988117],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592245,0.00063125114,0.00014525671,0.0003419905,0.0010275309,0.0019315067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598868,0.013125926,0.0072579044,0.0016044735,0.0126788085,0.0054460973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007851512,0.0004924041,0.0010732797,0.0030620815,0.00572427,0.00385982,0.002577911,0.0020363901,0.014323115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028498119,0.00040461277,0.0006375602,0.006913467,0.0029198076,0.0014196573,0.0016357298,0.00236067,0.0009231309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018949735,0.00033900433,0.91986793,0.00037602018,0.00046981283,0.00025919834,0.0050589372,0.0003879941,0.00018226639,0.007948298,0.034877338,0.028338294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007498737,0.00004107488,0.983213,0.000086304666,0.00020443916,0.000020499057,0.003656233,0.0001221583,0.00009891586,0.00034307208,0.012115588,0.000023797564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98969996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021581601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021581601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02877491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15658623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079953312","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.025","title":"The Kramer problem: Micro-macro resolution with a Danish pool","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Macro; Danish; Political science; National election; Perception; Positive economics; Economics; Public economics; Psychology; Political economy; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04748012977054439,"score_gpt":0.34887637038065417,"score_spread":0.3013962406101098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079953312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6072859,0.0054631415,0.18086638,0.037084546,0.0005868934,0.0005480772,0.005594329,0.00014237648,0.16242841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957003,0.0005269392,0.018519953,0.00066619174,0.000097979086,0.00021670423,0.00029053705,0.000038009843,0.02264075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98500884,0.008536372,0.00093908916,0.002917104,0.001320855,0.0012776419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97352254,0.018619029,0.002107634,0.0038508866,0.0012034617,0.0006964344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023181843,0.000506634,0.0035124063,0.0017221008,0.0074076895,0.0062271203,0.0022815578,0.0024216222,0.015162268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04414873,0.0010289899,0.0013618778,0.0034351088,0.005112223,0.0089503145,0.0075210137,0.0022638135,0.00064025476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019433016,0.00004699087,0.007017529,0.00015724583,0.00014778445,0.00032433565,0.0029925527,0.006245306,0.000098756354,0.96711135,0.0044701924,0.011193593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002811432,0.00014339422,0.014774774,0.00029151636,0.00045654073,0.00036202828,0.01665616,0.03793183,0.00056946895,0.8730876,0.055293977,0.00015159266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07196817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10447167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07196817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039352276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006463533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14309853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079970571","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.014","title":"Manipulating electoral laws in Singapore","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Dominance (genetics); Authoritarianism; Political science; Hegemony; Political economy; Democracy; Electoral system; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.09881133439723412,"score_gpt":0.3880717933669963,"score_spread":0.2892604589697622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079970571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840537,0.00002917722,0.00011827294,0.00050378294,0.000010724491,0.000022074084,0.000045808232,0.0000038714725,0.015212668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99712855,0.000030229916,0.00010491785,0.00008965408,0.0000035061012,0.000026501417,0.000024416298,0.0000024771643,0.002589821],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651366,0.0023332553,0.00015691432,0.00016701261,0.00033945285,0.0004897429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893378,0.0058269226,0.0020795097,0.0010008904,0.00097219995,0.00078272866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059409253,0.00011535499,0.00027853932,0.00055768416,0.002213832,0.0023074127,0.00045382965,0.0005403282,0.005798391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016270315,0.00014937534,0.00018342394,0.0012994814,0.0016030701,0.0009861436,0.0026999319,0.001015838,0.00043550538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001830528,0.0033697567,0.6202083,0.0002832137,0.00033577433,0.0015118398,0.085814744,0.0034569334,0.008113036,0.13901609,0.0069854055,0.12907434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022126906,0.0018792773,0.8541299,0.000112462694,0.00027459595,0.000108314205,0.07960177,0.004684139,0.0078299865,0.009246035,0.0418607,0.00005147901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038402706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10746027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038402706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036667348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044077355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07635838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081436998","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.003","title":"What are the current preoccupations of economic voting research?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Current (fluid); Voting; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.23367082036630032,"score_gpt":0.3804469898450158,"score_spread":0.14677616947871547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081436998","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021834867,0.32355756,0.019622914,0.60978466,0.005657219,0.000039239676,0.00028212345,0.00007656351,0.019144913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39380133,0.4398751,0.01825939,0.06918143,0.07136102,0.0002923612,0.00055866665,0.00014095934,0.006529678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98801583,0.0074265627,0.00049105374,0.0015269034,0.0017885269,0.00075114897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8004579,0.17020966,0.006809184,0.0056692087,0.012139777,0.0047143223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038759064,0.0006058629,0.003044992,0.004337447,0.0033693705,0.017146861,0.0039708684,0.0090132365,0.013936747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09986414,0.00083879026,0.0010286572,0.008288247,0.02585411,0.03424886,0.0039101276,0.009189404,0.002255893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002931777,0.00040880425,0.0084011005,0.0027121294,0.00012201526,0.000065146276,0.0020741695,0.0015522416,0.00020256836,0.7377763,0.049790397,0.1966019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003999554,0.00007952849,0.0048482073,0.0016510705,0.000029762181,0.00009946951,0.006647859,0.0021676086,0.0000858231,0.9037908,0.08049779,0.000062160114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034115678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056152632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038759064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032200299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004091319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20498002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084833011","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.01.009","title":"The 2014 parliamentary elections in Bulgaria","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Legislature; Political science; General election; Political economy; Extreme right; Public administration; Geography; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.10118492417174667,"score_gpt":0.3848039865413619,"score_spread":0.2836190623696152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084833011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723158,0.0019230352,0.00011355927,0.006241428,0.0004919049,0.000030879546,0.0009581645,0.000013255011,0.017912049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872957,0.0005236461,0.000051358784,0.00054746383,0.00008672463,0.00001747953,0.00065702636,0.000011225566,0.0108093],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798393,0.00029484407,0.00011024467,0.00016809726,0.00022565965,0.0012171058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839133,0.00036292753,0.0003975985,0.00006520204,0.0005006516,0.00028217112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022907907,0.00029775483,0.0008431053,0.001988603,0.0023055025,0.0038532931,0.0007881799,0.0016312405,0.004541841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005938665,0.00053114555,0.00034607423,0.0036921494,0.0017170045,0.0014979495,0.0027008834,0.0025189307,0.0006004085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033627253,0.0005045623,0.5615741,0.0019186498,0.00067470706,0.005230199,0.0684261,0.012996991,0.0045858906,0.103674576,0.09972357,0.13732798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029163479,0.00008408687,0.94115746,0.0002067739,0.00004189125,0.00008872844,0.022258453,0.0004601299,0.0004248507,0.00068849284,0.03453055,0.000029489212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3017152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5117751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3017152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015686369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010787697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.599918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086013289","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.013","title":"The federal election in Canada, January 2006","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Predictability; Univariate; Bivariate analysis; Predictive power; China; Econometrics; Economics; Robustness (evolution); Stock market; Index (typography); Stock (firearms); Stock market index; Political science; Statistics; Multivariate statistics; Geography; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01782659267636503,"score_gpt":0.2145661142523388,"score_spread":0.19673952157597377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086013289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5106815,0.030270988,0.00072061556,0.17547491,0.0077233794,0.00038026212,0.103079446,0.00029189233,0.17137696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78132945,0.007730872,0.00036636114,0.00711209,0.0009890477,0.0000780519,0.017397923,0.00010294571,0.18489319],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972928,0.00009424184,0.000096018695,0.00015080284,0.0011456398,0.0012204481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937034,0.00031419646,0.0003797438,0.00009998517,0.004289876,0.0012127034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018765463,0.00030308115,0.0007959889,0.0035918683,0.011147419,0.0063494365,0.0012062242,0.002130279,0.007831116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090459455,0.00040616983,0.0004396968,0.007660381,0.0011025381,0.0012129268,0.0014348502,0.003529382,0.0009817381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046461265,0.00018014137,0.16181079,0.00033842123,0.00014655337,0.00033805447,0.004795549,0.0013075658,0.00017977924,0.019357601,0.7560676,0.055013355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044065368,0.00003349571,0.5565458,0.00021046694,0.00006211067,0.000077337274,0.009281311,0.0007180753,0.0002946646,0.00070756406,0.431954,0.000071134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09444269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09444269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12147105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6852329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091064756","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.002","title":"One voter, two first-order elections?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"National election; Order (exchange); Political science; Turnout; General election; Voter turnout; Politics; Primary election; Ranked voting system; Public administration; Political economy; Voting; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.18337803252381296,"score_gpt":0.41372182532642615,"score_spread":0.2303437928026132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091064756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85798144,0.0018782412,0.006802847,0.025102952,0.00061353744,0.000052129297,0.00024353217,0.000047517256,0.10727784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98921096,0.00026683055,0.00080205966,0.0004935619,0.00023744103,0.000019944557,0.00005106902,0.000011938048,0.008905971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957547,0.0021761768,0.00010565538,0.0005827168,0.00038359253,0.0009971538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870422,0.0066328607,0.002433729,0.001415002,0.000842618,0.0016335248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00688117,0.00028134306,0.0009182894,0.001066862,0.002579186,0.00444476,0.0008732645,0.0020609393,0.028425034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023783265,0.0003107758,0.00041124882,0.0011118762,0.004188214,0.0070347115,0.0014300621,0.0020633845,0.0018594348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010772423,0.0004365714,0.037946235,0.00024000127,0.00010340347,0.00023323142,0.005955168,0.0005820466,0.0006928278,0.88788307,0.009162321,0.055687808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006952448,0.0007764372,0.08490916,0.0004143305,0.00024177229,0.0011038461,0.033656128,0.0062300395,0.0022428208,0.7905806,0.0790252,0.00012435287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019322259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003637151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028425034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011188687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012549058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09509122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092468239","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2014.05.002","title":"Fundamental models for forecasting elections at the state level","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Quarter (Canadian coin); Econometrics; Voting; Presidential election; Presidential system; Computer science; Economic forecasting; State (computer science); Economics; Politics; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.37227102893229025,"score_gpt":0.425154844127967,"score_spread":0.05288381519567675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092468239","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22742681,0.0012793101,0.7444406,0.0050183884,0.00027034702,0.00017489189,0.0034408532,0.00035364562,0.017595122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493866,0.0011760709,0.03502525,0.00019794196,0.00036438397,0.0003590715,0.0019649852,0.00006901422,0.011456664],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932075,0.00031041095,0.000031584714,0.00014126534,0.00008033243,0.00011576279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963368,0.0028100326,0.0002994975,0.00018943858,0.00023811097,0.00012607314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00252885,0.0005560613,0.0012528492,0.001144161,0.0007877076,0.0023849744,0.0016638626,0.001986333,0.0061912145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011869445,0.0006516522,0.0010761551,0.001586508,0.0008965109,0.002709473,0.00095586077,0.0024843083,0.00066419184],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030821095,0.00004787287,0.004255277,0.000042450643,0.00006877808,0.000027325072,0.00014600715,0.8193729,0.00022153486,0.16060565,0.002652231,0.0125291245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011989055,0.000012379683,0.0012268791,0.000010068163,0.000014385508,0.000007702665,0.000045816516,0.8866727,0.00006835488,0.110751234,0.0011696232,0.000008919337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014960979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016401563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014960979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018594833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016481244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029747784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094145922","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2009.12.004","title":"Why are highly informed citizens sceptical of referenda?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Skepticism; Voting; Political science; Politics; Democracy; Competence (human resources); Representative democracy; Centrality; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.0978313216538471,"score_gpt":0.4073795205594935,"score_spread":0.3095481989056464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094145922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84750366,0.0013063331,0.0021299757,0.08558169,0.00057825376,0.000053240852,0.0001746478,0.00005584656,0.062616386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881181,0.0003265331,0.00032915975,0.007369946,0.00018078707,0.000023479573,0.00006556848,0.000016808412,0.0035696456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896511,0.004828351,0.0004718574,0.00065181154,0.0026649993,0.0017319225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92326456,0.037421785,0.013154861,0.008296255,0.011067683,0.0067947656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120443795,0.00015430083,0.00034932533,0.0020287829,0.0034163147,0.00742756,0.0010259887,0.003584016,0.007107548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093406215,0.00039432046,0.00027706008,0.0020788745,0.0066146064,0.004769153,0.0029243715,0.004994482,0.0015555138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058256293,0.00042753728,0.43243244,0.00038202934,0.00025355784,0.0017105887,0.1903923,0.00028548922,0.0020104728,0.101620674,0.05484797,0.21505436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014779696,0.00029802494,0.30673373,0.0009629097,0.00019903091,0.0017662059,0.3511422,0.0010503147,0.0036290998,0.16407932,0.16980523,0.00018618506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060830605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077998526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0120443795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011044887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022840078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06369758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121933130","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2011.03.005","title":"Searching for electoral irregularities in an established democracy: Applying Benford’s Law tests to Bundestag elections in Unified Germany","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Benford's law; Democracy; Political science; Precinct; German; Variation (astronomy); State (computer science); Political economy; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Geography; Statistics","score_opus":0.212681193899514,"score_gpt":0.39245947445675816,"score_spread":0.17977828055724415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121933130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962282,0.00009551711,0.00075259537,0.0005783654,0.000007350619,0.000011278213,0.00005659639,0.0000065801546,0.0022634475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999046,0.000023201399,0.00030343054,0.000030072555,0.000008304316,0.000008052474,0.000089525965,0.0000022974818,0.0004889903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99317694,0.0044247275,0.00036723004,0.0004103126,0.00058011623,0.001040567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9231611,0.060091946,0.009037078,0.0029605436,0.0028670721,0.0018822796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009012666,0.00020616227,0.0008442912,0.0037304016,0.0024054698,0.0029055248,0.0013856674,0.0013407934,0.004001038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06779029,0.00028197787,0.00048188417,0.0051381825,0.003068012,0.0029111013,0.0023797657,0.0016125767,0.00030751375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009661657,0.0004737652,0.85062945,0.0001259873,0.00021154573,0.0007736611,0.010023513,0.005611935,0.0002834393,0.07362837,0.0048600817,0.052412152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000210089,0.00055641524,0.85683787,0.00011390847,0.0002535491,0.00025604415,0.029748006,0.057367038,0.0014486867,0.044737227,0.008400816,0.00007031008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0675198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10578855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0675198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028240117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022109824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13425356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187826436","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.010","title":"The British general election: Synthetic forecasts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Presidential election; Context (archaeology); General election; Political science; Public opinion; History; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.12797591467368383,"score_gpt":0.39558219403436,"score_spread":0.26760627936067616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187826436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92594165,0.0010056249,0.013477587,0.0024343506,0.00036206743,0.00008564065,0.03158419,0.0005365036,0.024572475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720544,0.00024856388,0.002561944,0.000058789068,0.00007539241,0.00004985007,0.019746602,0.0000980987,0.005106256],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862874,0.0009710558,0.000042480544,0.00011303238,0.0001720915,0.00007256583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99186796,0.005425764,0.00033422458,0.0006485347,0.0014454118,0.0002781014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026075419,0.00027548784,0.0004411381,0.00095770176,0.00060296245,0.0014458384,0.0005583189,0.0008445559,0.005802554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020643258,0.00033903035,0.0002821804,0.002272934,0.0003881479,0.000758093,0.00048176723,0.0008622808,0.001277593],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016222713,0.00013504688,0.05060611,0.0002976313,0.00018820667,0.0002145294,0.0011008229,0.7632829,0.00053167506,0.03490701,0.10676952,0.040344197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021029628,0.00011264038,0.05499462,0.00009847951,0.000054600234,0.00008145542,0.0010291054,0.882716,0.00052701606,0.015095196,0.04498395,0.00009664606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17825902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20789738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17825902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019673917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009705908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35444283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2434378327","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.003","title":"Come hell or high water: An investigation of the effects of a natural disaster on a local election","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Natural disaster; Turnout; Flood myth; Flooding (psychology); Natural (archaeology); Population; Political science; Geography; Demography; Sociology; Psychology; Voting; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.01753247608198083,"score_gpt":0.2939381396653146,"score_spread":0.2764056635833338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2434378327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937239,0.000025002124,0.00003276284,0.0006065623,0.00001551674,0.000020346404,0.000031012554,0.000002065762,0.0055427467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798054,0.000045606455,0.00003300507,0.00015888643,0.00001248333,0.000021736147,0.000038230653,0.000002513278,0.0017069214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871564,0.0008169863,0.00003431795,0.000056432425,0.000079471894,0.00029715477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913953,0.0048897755,0.0011336858,0.00045417022,0.00071016705,0.0014169107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026464248,0.0001761966,0.00025983862,0.0010678448,0.0062846174,0.0021691034,0.0008421326,0.0011033524,0.006957309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011868563,0.00024400446,0.00025882514,0.0012465026,0.0023277965,0.0013475072,0.0021364326,0.0019946538,0.00060817937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042864215,0.010276817,0.5648069,0.0003549152,0.00023622006,0.004475619,0.3274596,0.0011643715,0.0029691076,0.016921258,0.014274622,0.05277418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076632525,0.0012994189,0.38378844,0.000042912157,0.000048296373,0.00024729193,0.5980478,0.0005266196,0.00042015474,0.0010716086,0.01440456,0.000026335323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023317847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06507497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023317847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015196451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016950583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046364248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549592443","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2016.11.010","title":"The role of partisan cues in voter mobilization campaigns: Evidence from a randomized field experiment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Political science; Preference; Mobilization; Heuristics; Phone; Voter turnout; General election; Social psychology; Public relations; Voting; Psychology; Politics; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05122575791456549,"score_gpt":0.38356101462479086,"score_spread":0.33233525671022535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549592443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99177355,0.00020903141,0.00096149166,0.00039969137,0.00018516136,0.0010791547,0.00015477555,0.000027638429,0.0052094837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99408567,0.00015023677,0.001544559,0.00045777016,0.00018012428,0.0015833087,0.0001408301,0.000017247881,0.0018402251],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792149,0.016298495,0.0006397177,0.0017753385,0.001240322,0.00083132106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7980162,0.1733438,0.015405805,0.007858695,0.0018566438,0.0035188755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01954923,0.0010422296,0.0012802071,0.0007190929,0.0024810585,0.0028293328,0.0013231271,0.0037144844,0.0182628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07648343,0.0013144217,0.0006067305,0.00062853954,0.002741317,0.0020078744,0.001352146,0.002789369,0.0018726776],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.53022957,0.24787785,0.078175895,0.002614663,0.0024361415,0.0003525166,0.006944609,0.0018296617,0.018560583,0.0065465546,0.004430814,0.10000125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.20403995,0.32493323,0.3877396,0.00082539313,0.0073787947,0.0004660542,0.00790498,0.014558771,0.017844364,0.019581806,0.014233261,0.0004937817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012189547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014838405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01954923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062362064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001170534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103387475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572457745","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2017.01.002","title":"Political opportunity structures and the representation of women and visible minorities in municipal elections","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Toronto Metropolitan University; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Candidacy; CONTEST; Victory; Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Political opportunity; General election; Political economy; Public administration; Demographic economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social movement","score_opus":0.12204168349952257,"score_gpt":0.42048848874968253,"score_spread":0.29844680525016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572457745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808624,0.00019397287,0.00014132351,0.0008106121,0.000020199468,0.0000065180952,0.000021681924,0.0000016195157,0.017941635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989592,0.000028572027,0.00001755673,0.000026693517,0.000008234757,0.0000028716438,0.000006026579,0.0000010505977,0.0009497706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593604,0.0021960011,0.00008725863,0.00015250532,0.00033346264,0.0012946556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628,0.0016546398,0.00090266456,0.00018681245,0.00026819122,0.00070776796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031447879,0.00012418024,0.00025285798,0.0017133948,0.004107266,0.004349306,0.0005177327,0.0007156262,0.006591464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01186509,0.00015638147,0.00016823997,0.0015364059,0.002519675,0.0013948093,0.0035665787,0.0008589358,0.00034370198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018769087,0.0006272519,0.41535625,0.00017439034,0.00013063574,0.0006577018,0.30524027,0.00043630006,0.004218526,0.16781767,0.0045216745,0.098942384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004447625,0.00027455395,0.6270795,0.00013361372,0.000052012983,0.00019146346,0.32920235,0.00065510016,0.0011003072,0.018192373,0.02304438,0.000029854136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008621357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026184803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008621357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016175645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010892479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022050679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760318507","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.010","title":"When heuristics go bad: Citizens' misevaluations of campaign pledge fulfilment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Pledge; Heuristics; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Heuristic; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.18902930473505833,"score_gpt":0.4537980593728693,"score_spread":0.264768754637811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760318507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818417,0.00023754052,0.0005160818,0.0020356919,0.000047795125,0.000020260555,0.000098412886,0.000023179316,0.015179457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931717,0.000038600178,0.00017385451,0.00014354117,0.000010789865,0.000009480649,0.000047476176,0.000008122015,0.00025094138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912178,0.005915149,0.00045818096,0.0004158536,0.0013661176,0.00062686595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9000746,0.061992496,0.018121658,0.005783987,0.010420742,0.0036065264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01428139,0.00025225527,0.00037155455,0.0026131785,0.0013027535,0.0051359846,0.00048711037,0.0019472574,0.0025957527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12729892,0.00033558696,0.00027761032,0.0017252078,0.002012834,0.0034137846,0.0017732413,0.0019230447,0.00044176384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016415641,0.00040990152,0.8486565,0.00017291996,0.00028413645,0.00027408756,0.048113,0.0010845895,0.0006187307,0.009598354,0.009914047,0.07923209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075160235,0.0004007772,0.88230896,0.00020351156,0.00016692006,0.00021941519,0.08417798,0.0046472973,0.0009922927,0.016492289,0.0101908455,0.00012463449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007679838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010970866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01428139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015748634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00122099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075528145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801030683","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.005","title":"Introduction: Personality, party leaders, and election campaigns","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychopathy; Authoritarianism; Machiavellianism; Big Five personality traits; Dark triad; Narcissism; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Great Rift; Personality; Political science; Democracy; Law","score_opus":0.11020691660668049,"score_gpt":0.41940653036503567,"score_spread":0.3091996137583552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801030683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5050167,0.0687387,0.0061191367,0.24722083,0.034066148,0.00015788038,0.006563689,0.00019596415,0.13192101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82125086,0.028633498,0.003374602,0.026735224,0.037953693,0.0003001695,0.0023662352,0.000058450943,0.07932731],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967897,0.0001318376,0.000020856674,0.00007564546,0.00007190096,0.000020888521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995368,0.0032980908,0.00037921275,0.000116630705,0.00046867068,0.00036937793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016302733,0.00039136162,0.00025747955,0.0005262496,0.00083834236,0.0020200547,0.00044857827,0.0013483128,0.024030834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048430744,0.00013342929,0.00020117902,0.0011752454,0.0006249192,0.0010072825,0.00049174274,0.0014827205,0.0021337566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007559182,0.000945252,0.17914097,0.0029399435,0.00022020157,0.0004806167,0.0049277064,0.00061764097,0.002159263,0.06552868,0.39570478,0.34657907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016511853,0.00056155585,0.69419426,0.0014541155,0.0001946819,0.0006967659,0.005479229,0.0010068142,0.0007342704,0.033026487,0.26240274,0.00008395433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093880045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021327813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024030834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024275397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045971392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08039117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883667544","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2018.07.002","title":"What makes people believe that their party won the election?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Parliament; Split-ticket voting; Primary election; Single non-transferable vote; General election; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Test (biology); Whip (tree); Realigning election; Political economy; Law; Politics; Economics; Democracy; Socialism; Geography; Communism","score_opus":0.11360418245056043,"score_gpt":0.39785217414502433,"score_spread":0.2842479916944639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883667544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94367754,0.000561667,0.0003199199,0.0154126715,0.00019405798,0.000016363472,0.0001506411,0.000005571916,0.03966165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99842846,0.00013776128,0.000032253873,0.00045560618,0.00006968378,0.000005773466,0.000038672322,0.000003138991,0.0008287229],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965856,0.0017072037,0.00010512737,0.00027365188,0.0005450593,0.0007833378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775712,0.011903842,0.00522406,0.00079828996,0.0021416445,0.0023608538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004438586,0.00017895561,0.00035760485,0.0014653808,0.0019448542,0.0043340754,0.00048053995,0.0017199306,0.012010846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028008709,0.00023019375,0.0002867625,0.0014097691,0.0030303062,0.0026909015,0.0010320108,0.0024481195,0.0012146096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055050134,0.00065818185,0.82585025,0.0002599794,0.0005325,0.00042700648,0.06498559,0.00016126824,0.0006085953,0.027516643,0.011912577,0.066536926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007157509,0.00016619643,0.8372846,0.00020982987,0.00020622088,0.00034635307,0.1281231,0.0006311533,0.0004430054,0.017130872,0.015346362,0.000040629067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005004879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00743847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012010846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008628265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007242903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040180266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916893145","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2019.02.011","title":"What is the cost of voting?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Turnout; Democracy; Bullet voting; Disapproval voting; Public economics; Cardinal voting systems; Voting behavior; Work (physics); Political science; Ranked voting system; Voter turnout; Business; Economics; Politics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.08518817712502742,"score_gpt":0.40818468219446413,"score_spread":0.3229965050694367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916893145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77409786,0.0033251024,0.005683247,0.045493137,0.00054960605,0.000068496745,0.0011327661,0.000039857925,0.16960993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944078,0.0004637942,0.00033570058,0.00041519545,0.00020065758,0.000015039475,0.00008587499,0.00001231191,0.004063657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958456,0.0024695303,0.00013998515,0.00021434984,0.00060896325,0.00072159246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713669,0.02205489,0.0022538637,0.0012249498,0.001616971,0.0014824455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003055907,0.00016388891,0.0008164295,0.0011429061,0.0009084299,0.003758703,0.00067783863,0.0014889472,0.02279128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035533577,0.00023754082,0.00038679317,0.0020315738,0.001951682,0.0032230907,0.0009665847,0.0013259554,0.0010516354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013127149,0.0006407403,0.24305211,0.00083325844,0.0005175858,0.00060426816,0.0017556135,0.011089196,0.0012433905,0.4459927,0.023013538,0.26994485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018091788,0.00032549477,0.412282,0.00050587143,0.00038531527,0.0012314824,0.011956897,0.018170284,0.0011219395,0.51335806,0.040386956,0.000094840085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037764413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005590015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02279128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015057349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008186576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076244354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980233304","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102070","title":"The measurement of electoral competition, with application to Indian states","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Carleton University; Shastri Indo-Canadian Institute","keywords":"Competition (biology); Legislature; Political science; Power (physics); Political economy; Economics; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.04015134022713287,"score_gpt":0.3423227522382233,"score_spread":0.30217141201109043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980233304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9096729,0.0006918,0.010843841,0.0006206687,0.000057074925,0.00015424521,0.0012266864,0.000028865135,0.07670392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99383104,0.00013185092,0.0049304725,0.000029891708,0.000027224187,0.00009053663,0.00028166448,0.0000068080394,0.00067042914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956649,0.0020397094,0.0004060098,0.0003516696,0.00093902135,0.0005987095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98671675,0.005792362,0.003931269,0.0008058132,0.0018468475,0.0009069861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004856968,0.00030434187,0.00048909686,0.009055367,0.0026559683,0.0025783337,0.00076030643,0.00034439343,0.0030611197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0156099815,0.00015721364,0.0007730047,0.017984373,0.0032310283,0.0019030744,0.0035423085,0.0011226026,0.00016360224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014161482,0.00015252808,0.78056484,0.00023995164,0.000115477655,0.00016965343,0.012415674,0.0051735407,0.0008902817,0.1328454,0.0013696235,0.06592139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011143974,0.00048013518,0.9266004,0.00012576165,0.00006447772,0.00043151053,0.02249837,0.008462219,0.00090918056,0.024848638,0.01548001,0.00008811125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021773137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038821403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021773137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034034874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030048185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04329282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049548963","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102200","title":"Do young voters vote for young leaders?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Turnout; Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; Voter turnout; General election; Focus (optics); Test (biology); Voting; Demographic economics; Political economy; Public relations; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.18947698312632155,"score_gpt":0.40887269750566474,"score_spread":0.2193957143793432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049548963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9702079,0.00091010774,0.00008396608,0.00983284,0.00022902494,0.000016456192,0.0002513215,0.0000029629125,0.018465292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954999,0.00038072778,0.000018025852,0.00077391596,0.00012761628,0.000008332077,0.00009516434,0.0000030240972,0.0030933002],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886394,0.00046554522,0.000030374766,0.00005939229,0.00013052174,0.0004502599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939668,0.0020279035,0.0019023359,0.0001412038,0.00064607867,0.0013155912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024169486,0.000112292866,0.00025361733,0.0009539929,0.0012582672,0.002463445,0.00030198513,0.0012044476,0.009384514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011641258,0.00018060689,0.0002152353,0.0009159649,0.00074118655,0.0016413798,0.0006346448,0.00100281,0.0018563935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004897624,0.00019054153,0.931684,0.00010222976,0.000059668375,0.00022731615,0.01616826,0.000030036583,0.00026910487,0.004718654,0.011157519,0.03490295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045963825,0.00016918333,0.90959805,0.0001730402,0.000045100733,0.00015648361,0.06342821,0.00014137792,0.00024624716,0.0014831921,0.024498552,0.00001451319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008533819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02100546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009384514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005840804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078467495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031394303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087277790","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102204","title":"Policy congruence and its impact on satisfaction with democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Congruence (geometry); Respondent; Democracy; Ideology; Politics; Political science; Elite; Public policy; Public administration; Political economy; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07337371087409572,"score_gpt":0.41872148458029723,"score_spread":0.3453477737062015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087277790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886669,0.000117700794,0.00013204159,0.00068737566,0.000016586233,0.000015571235,0.000104067905,0.0000058516284,0.010253915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938834,0.000028920198,0.000039220336,0.000024196082,0.000009941765,0.000006592528,0.00006170772,0.000003098747,0.0004380463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923045,0.005259244,0.00046375208,0.0004000123,0.00062341435,0.000949077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94399226,0.03219877,0.0110399015,0.0025233533,0.003166507,0.007079178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006577176,0.00018205284,0.00050071394,0.0014874522,0.0016473376,0.004924017,0.0005748823,0.0011474141,0.017321752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043201,0.00017977001,0.0005036139,0.0023789757,0.0015253717,0.0012875698,0.0024539419,0.001856648,0.0009656984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012363975,0.0013195858,0.97160757,0.000048360223,0.00015617393,0.000150715,0.0040390682,0.0004106953,0.000350164,0.005122519,0.00044483852,0.015113912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007925333,0.00039499876,0.9841891,0.00002926554,0.000063282816,0.00013913464,0.009185393,0.000977685,0.00023656705,0.00321739,0.0014761623,0.0000116656565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002820764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030629581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017321752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011366388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013569013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0579471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124921334","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2016.05.008","title":"Incumbency effects in U.S. presidential campaigns: Language patterns matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Presidential system; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.030348822389680542,"score_gpt":0.376936692103599,"score_spread":0.3465878697139184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124921334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987632,0.00045603263,0.000043433774,0.0012073347,0.000019887235,0.000004520515,0.0002820217,0.000004477763,0.010350366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769455,0.00015269883,0.000014747349,0.00012874765,0.000032578377,0.0000036312188,0.0002047331,0.000007677634,0.0017606592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832386,0.0008482627,0.000085941705,0.00020191034,0.00018758955,0.00035247792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903522,0.005480101,0.0019777785,0.00033480275,0.00084457174,0.0010105689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022079968,0.00015478078,0.00024749018,0.0015691791,0.0009504828,0.0021352456,0.00027624718,0.0005020375,0.019503836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012059238,0.00016628849,0.00030787394,0.002094511,0.0007530036,0.001560719,0.0014628022,0.0009462986,0.0023573358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008719944,0.00038786384,0.9370284,0.0001395726,0.00026379872,0.00019188781,0.014132637,0.00018346419,0.0015142532,0.004098085,0.004164699,0.037023447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016054306,0.000064026855,0.99105877,0.000032868586,0.000053780346,0.000032906508,0.0060705007,0.00011957413,0.00019885649,0.00044106884,0.0019050713,0.000006594797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010385398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03699418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019503836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000498399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048623432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06524682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125711898","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2007.07.005","title":"Estimating voter migration in Canada using generalized maximum entropy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of maximum entropy; Statistical physics; Econometrics; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.08628621678495313,"score_gpt":0.38771372300646467,"score_spread":0.30142750622151154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125711898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99200296,0.00024505425,0.005249872,0.00030987983,0.000013714053,0.00003434101,0.0008893981,0.00008539879,0.0011693923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927834,0.000085333224,0.004725082,0.00002272836,0.0000064604683,0.000018401528,0.0009826521,0.000023573428,0.0013522669],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991042,0.00035526964,0.000029414276,0.00010683979,0.000101000136,0.00030322198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970392,0.0014580042,0.00018211023,0.00016350634,0.0009071752,0.00025000668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002378117,0.0005207952,0.0010312466,0.0027906452,0.0036620551,0.0017512343,0.0010991226,0.0007604622,0.0018949512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009653021,0.00039771476,0.000858442,0.0031908355,0.0008706179,0.0006106767,0.001176937,0.0007191501,0.00024090892],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073991227,0.00016563894,0.43086922,0.00014330714,0.00043220032,0.00026760102,0.0011816092,0.48059237,0.00084581337,0.010677733,0.0047544553,0.06933015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010288969,0.000043779102,0.20367202,0.00006572586,0.000069791415,0.000048946968,0.0018860438,0.78519964,0.00082322385,0.005696628,0.0023033067,0.000088042056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98638797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98989457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017448263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017448263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021717742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12659657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127480265","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102291","title":"More ‘Europe’, less Democracy? European integration does not erode satisfaction with democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; European union; Balance (ability); Political science; Politics; European integration; Power (physics); Democratic deficit; Political economy; Development economics; Economics; International trade; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.07149197890581331,"score_gpt":0.36219448592552167,"score_spread":0.29070250701970834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127480265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757136,0.0005227623,0.0001380519,0.004307456,0.00008466303,0.0000050746585,0.00013657528,0.000009149259,0.019082611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760795,0.00010263797,0.00003787897,0.00030353433,0.000025621956,0.0000028785225,0.00007676291,0.0000054115067,0.0018373322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684864,0.0014699576,0.00013875976,0.00023917803,0.00028655308,0.0010168998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98124295,0.00626776,0.0053572836,0.001234301,0.0011241237,0.004773609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045725685,0.00021178437,0.0006992402,0.0008782323,0.0015211536,0.0043839826,0.00064868137,0.0015358565,0.022872707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016111134,0.00014794861,0.00052099576,0.002495295,0.0019855609,0.0028079373,0.0033916798,0.0014870607,0.0011017596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014089448,0.0010121225,0.8929196,0.00017172845,0.0004214807,0.0005371002,0.008376642,0.00038636968,0.0007161858,0.02338151,0.0042099482,0.06645836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007444022,0.00023940275,0.9661868,0.00011957217,0.00014788457,0.0001616733,0.015685644,0.00022252416,0.00028926268,0.0039307233,0.012924273,0.000017679768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00647195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011284557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022872707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007809452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015781884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07651687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137312298","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102317","title":"Did you see it coming? Explaining the accuracy of voter expectations for district and (sub)national election outcomes in multi-party systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Sophistication; National election; Preference; Politics; Political science; Voting; Work (physics); Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.16225706378283633,"score_gpt":0.4382771896651659,"score_spread":0.27602012588232955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137312298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99556184,0.00006382559,0.00044008446,0.00066225167,0.000019356505,0.000011334263,0.00014670768,0.0000062073714,0.0030883783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959856,0.000011264534,0.00004956825,0.0000322361,0.000010171661,0.0000046796176,0.00008189861,0.0000035337355,0.00020815704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943399,0.0035834245,0.0002834983,0.0006812792,0.0003815312,0.0007303493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8924988,0.08191378,0.01112555,0.007903247,0.0044632554,0.0020953387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016228743,0.00024798053,0.0005888579,0.00092804217,0.0011661274,0.003319262,0.0010181915,0.0012633272,0.010606461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09017342,0.00033623687,0.0006378219,0.0011686378,0.0014125622,0.0018513369,0.0020742025,0.0017680774,0.001450742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071850966,0.00013014108,0.98086447,0.000049756254,0.0001903438,0.00007032204,0.0044104727,0.0010812266,0.00028461262,0.0030916322,0.0007350472,0.008373391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073929135,0.00017678816,0.97696733,0.00004377571,0.00011234028,0.00006920444,0.0069721085,0.0083721895,0.00047934437,0.005308227,0.0013952445,0.000029590059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0111640105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011655905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016228743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007599276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005593768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085826874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159479758","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102334","title":"Is compulsory voting habit-forming? Regression discontinuity evidence from Brazil","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Turnout; Regression discontinuity design; Political science; Scope (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Group voting ticket; Voting behavior; Single-member district; Ranked voting system; Economics; Law; Computer science; Politics; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1457805920220383,"score_gpt":0.4420809344766271,"score_spread":0.2963003424545888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159479758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99103314,0.0010215974,0.0006576473,0.0009780043,0.000011679243,0.00003304333,0.000837733,0.000011228958,0.005415877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987664,0.0002201022,0.0001401115,0.000041643983,0.000006125453,0.0000087335,0.0002759026,0.0000054914804,0.0005355635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974662,0.0012143571,0.00015917055,0.00037090233,0.00024378527,0.0005455529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95317215,0.028817525,0.009629836,0.003991761,0.002996844,0.0013919193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062850905,0.0002740102,0.00089656084,0.0014212684,0.0013383323,0.0012861186,0.0013633437,0.00057123427,0.005510225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03421677,0.00038564423,0.00057907193,0.0032087455,0.00142906,0.0007867324,0.0015599129,0.001131148,0.00039262057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021395065,0.0001792015,0.9581672,0.00020942466,0.0003345196,0.00026245354,0.007590898,0.0004351238,0.0003428773,0.009355513,0.0013394273,0.021569517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003684412,0.00007231169,0.9862888,0.00015750884,0.0003497517,0.000115568524,0.0060070115,0.0012342837,0.00028196818,0.0015388768,0.0039037033,0.000013466041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25655606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31074402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25655606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014682667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018751812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5101255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161542587","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102340","title":"Electoral incentives and elite racial identification: Why Brazilian politicians change their race","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Race (biology); Extant taxon; Political science; Incentive; Competition (biology); Political economy; Politics; Identification (biology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Position (finance); Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Geography; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.11076053706119604,"score_gpt":0.39925209315916976,"score_spread":0.2884915560979737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161542587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91623944,0.0007431457,0.00037941115,0.009905563,0.00006231808,0.00002130441,0.00013514973,0.000006279891,0.07250727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99721694,0.00014461909,0.00006384963,0.00025002338,0.000017195567,0.0000070041647,0.000021138467,0.0000039030406,0.00227531],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759907,0.00094684213,0.00005358065,0.0002186083,0.00027682577,0.00090497494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942781,0.0024175798,0.0010346305,0.00039995677,0.0008780411,0.0009916349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040326254,0.00015210916,0.00029610583,0.0012444829,0.0036640845,0.00266959,0.00054617494,0.00090375287,0.011364077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018524397,0.00017148764,0.00022739542,0.0017010957,0.0023595295,0.0014222127,0.0017488712,0.00095971406,0.00054410566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035903728,0.00036784197,0.5836531,0.00024138829,0.00009087247,0.0003850251,0.08060771,0.0002897078,0.0015759193,0.2200248,0.008944184,0.10346043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003507295,0.00006117758,0.83014715,0.00029568866,0.000072735726,0.00012766334,0.087164216,0.0005573468,0.00036787786,0.01776145,0.06338738,0.000022235501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055499565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13522646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055499565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025832425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002944905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11035299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169641487","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102347","title":"The political phenotype of the disgust sensitive: Correlates of a new abbreviated measure of disgust sensitivity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Disgust; Politics; Social psychology; Ideology; Psychology; Ingroups and outgroups; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Anger","score_opus":0.11612222603043902,"score_gpt":0.3166177601585866,"score_spread":0.20049553412814758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169641487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918174,0.00008643716,0.0008597862,0.00006334664,0.000016425252,0.00002684415,0.00016682186,0.000017849756,0.006945044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99757856,0.00007553492,0.00092258624,0.00007000731,0.000010285193,0.000029648894,0.0001517888,0.000015834095,0.0011458888],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997453,0.000052752595,0.00002315303,0.000051509112,0.0000903695,0.000036914204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784756,0.00035095113,0.0008975558,0.00022254339,0.00025871233,0.00042276486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049909455,0.00025354745,0.00019221522,0.0011695436,0.0004630156,0.00061368383,0.00020981947,0.00040039574,0.0037119687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002901303,0.00008917459,0.00015287631,0.00041093258,0.00051811896,0.00025545736,0.0007249287,0.0008168471,0.0002791662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015288854,0.0010277758,0.37603876,0.0001888395,0.00017712377,0.0022684298,0.0028620877,0.00046170413,0.5581703,0.004474352,0.001815786,0.050985996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011564035,0.0002928043,0.9866303,0.000014625701,0.00002330152,0.0019649805,0.00053754327,0.000286147,0.0085157985,0.00071732234,0.0009914835,0.0000141820565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005657465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011587313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037119687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024191201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016017792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012417793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193750065","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102381","title":"Permissive electoral systems and descriptive representation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Permissive; Representation (politics); Descriptive statistics; Descriptive research; Proportional representation; Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science; Statistics; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15183174827763457,"score_gpt":0.41221113423180095,"score_spread":0.2603793859541664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193750065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87884057,0.00020120425,0.0044195782,0.0019477557,0.000046941357,0.000026754262,0.00013942514,0.000020175137,0.11435757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980404,0.00002581066,0.00021217295,0.000039429066,0.000010937262,0.000008161041,0.000024140529,0.000005452059,0.00163356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995691,0.0029878162,0.00014966574,0.00032527235,0.00040289882,0.00044334092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98979163,0.005568785,0.0015159111,0.0016614671,0.0007963235,0.0006657721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053663086,0.0001237299,0.00019087522,0.0015439902,0.0029516094,0.004185047,0.000517184,0.00047237327,0.010089248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019205859,0.00014744597,0.000115050374,0.0016357369,0.0057570115,0.0024352227,0.0022606764,0.00093818794,0.0004994839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024858344,0.00012927147,0.051229503,0.000059582013,0.000019064342,0.00011552819,0.04078252,0.0002568574,0.001056479,0.875987,0.001235792,0.028879827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008627665,0.00028787242,0.24545681,0.00019910467,0.000055579156,0.0007625343,0.12862459,0.002670545,0.004230266,0.56595755,0.051616944,0.000052045743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009784619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018948583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010089248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011131974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010524301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033751905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214080342","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102421","title":"Communicating safety precautions can help maintain in-person voter turnout during a pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"COVID-19 and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Turnout; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Priming (agriculture); Distancing; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Medicine; Computer science; Politics; Disease","score_opus":0.1355020953358742,"score_gpt":0.4357874996500697,"score_spread":0.3002854043141955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214080342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7376383,0.0016759804,0.0037656531,0.13573426,0.005183703,0.0006143079,0.00039094733,0.00057089614,0.11442596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774459,0.0010331109,0.0027458973,0.010019325,0.00089141465,0.00025558585,0.0001786422,0.00005738106,0.0073727774],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946109,0.0037585362,0.00025368933,0.00015248959,0.00036699156,0.0008574019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706242,0.014028994,0.00474283,0.0014337938,0.003662166,0.0055080056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007679634,0.00046629057,0.00035751605,0.0010796089,0.006214321,0.0033257722,0.0008252159,0.0025351136,0.02126018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06496756,0.00036328743,0.00041413703,0.00036283056,0.0008583962,0.0024944427,0.0029256148,0.0032448359,0.0039101574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009984028,0.0057815034,0.24985066,0.00091344165,0.00019314062,0.0012924734,0.072075106,0.00043518495,0.0023289607,0.0032708684,0.1528693,0.509991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004913556,0.00435384,0.37517223,0.004213406,0.00045732182,0.0010659851,0.3243535,0.0027009216,0.0055798176,0.013545689,0.26776823,0.00029777392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044958373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011809157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02126018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013003906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047544553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07112235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216868771","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102418","title":"Does the monetary cost of abstaining increase turnout? Causal evidence from Peru","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voter turnout; Voting; Demographic economics; Leverage (statistics); Political science; Sanctions; Economics; Poverty; Development economics; Economic growth; Politics","score_opus":0.11122757822158394,"score_gpt":0.3986503718752009,"score_spread":0.287422793653617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216868771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840313,0.0023980273,0.00030898003,0.0036609655,0.000027590373,0.000020993593,0.0005408033,0.000010592142,0.009000694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834454,0.0005672102,0.000054506763,0.00012714653,0.000037168964,0.000008557957,0.00013902326,0.0000024860462,0.0007193737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971232,0.0021419185,0.00008569937,0.00018205629,0.0001159036,0.0003512262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9563532,0.030164119,0.008987945,0.00186661,0.0013625404,0.0012657077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039093145,0.0003063447,0.0004750091,0.0010816462,0.0008509094,0.0013991938,0.0006807762,0.0011765895,0.01476659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027525261,0.0003042737,0.00045826242,0.0018660707,0.0011572626,0.0008968505,0.0015955011,0.0012972177,0.000598349],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031506307,0.0006786473,0.9643409,0.00050341245,0.0011002173,0.00066808733,0.0023667235,0.0008087296,0.0002883983,0.0067453682,0.0017949125,0.017553845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028768103,0.00070548,0.9823804,0.00013455862,0.001147651,0.0003036733,0.0044098203,0.0013132199,0.00027053163,0.003949642,0.0050766086,0.00002086285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0138714155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014869711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01476659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053838757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043085354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049399197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319212943","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102577","title":"Policy signals and strategic voting for minor parties: Evidence from Germany","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Minor (academic); Disapproval voting; Straight-ticket voting; Foregrounding; Scholarship; First-past-the-post voting; Political economy; Public administration; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.28819640815703534,"score_gpt":0.46385281159385255,"score_spread":0.1756564034368172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319212943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965714,0.00029112014,0.00007729542,0.0002159173,0.0000061370247,0.0000038090388,0.00018481161,0.0000020188986,0.0026475273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991935,0.00012388937,0.000021731623,0.000022315522,0.0000058674236,0.0000020466073,0.00016918416,0.000001088914,0.00046039268],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982145,0.000726127,0.00010869399,0.00018313175,0.00020761997,0.0005600038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900872,0.005554759,0.0027875013,0.0005122315,0.00049236894,0.00056588737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034488922,0.00032531362,0.00056995545,0.0020699599,0.0009351675,0.0018945914,0.0005069845,0.0009173532,0.0050339946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0088831065,0.00020494981,0.0003275206,0.0033537673,0.0013353823,0.0008170954,0.0011136264,0.0006100057,0.00051876536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028705844,0.00050625025,0.924188,0.00032020124,0.0006442706,0.0006064317,0.007057113,0.0018493191,0.0011615318,0.014386326,0.0031010844,0.04330878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006423286,0.00028550214,0.987331,0.000055882003,0.0001975576,0.00007984934,0.0056692204,0.0006020712,0.00055991416,0.0010920217,0.0040446445,0.000018226128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0235923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03365471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0235923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010506085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000790381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04690993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319454202","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102593","title":"Vaccine or catalyst? Christian religion and populism in Europe: A rejoinder to Inglehart's “Religion's sudden decline”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Democracy; Voting; Attendance; Radical right; Political science; Political economy; Social psychology; Church attendance; Positive economics; Religious studies; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Economics; Religiosity; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.056721753692822625,"score_gpt":0.3753082884613946,"score_spread":0.31858653476857196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319454202","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033776483,0.007742162,0.0003096993,0.9729067,0.012226216,0.0000059694275,0.000028178021,0.000011138998,0.0033922365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21093167,0.011249463,0.0013606828,0.701715,0.054531567,0.000090761554,0.00007472594,0.0001065515,0.019939527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589205,0.0020348534,0.00021143233,0.00059726683,0.0006290018,0.0006353823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98576605,0.009742419,0.00095045276,0.0009272702,0.001323206,0.0012905968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016870148,0.00057066587,0.0010869986,0.0017667683,0.0055508222,0.009603649,0.0021204604,0.02672394,0.0043431446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025488975,0.00037610903,0.0007404926,0.0014862382,0.019680267,0.016864194,0.0071695945,0.025306612,0.00072261156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116751624,0.00011717896,0.0030121424,0.00018672716,0.000067668036,0.00035660248,0.009797749,0.00018948878,0.00026366726,0.50509924,0.43885812,0.041934676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008608975,0.000075631,0.0044872896,0.00073067215,0.00005802912,0.00018442777,0.014660032,0.0003154587,0.00040215097,0.26407868,0.7148141,0.00010740304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008550174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014848163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02672394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022977719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008795232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089218974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322102733","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102599","title":"Spatial voting in non-partisan cities: A case study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ballot; Ideology; Voting; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Public administration; Voting behavior; Political economy; Public relations; Politics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.12826275838980708,"score_gpt":0.4363183695699442,"score_spread":0.30805561118013713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322102733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99529356,0.000055192235,0.00024495553,0.000097148106,0.0000029052203,0.000022693874,0.000091776805,0.0000041321287,0.004187671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980506,0.00006354857,0.000389682,0.000008804451,0.0000030176445,0.000012504174,0.00007463768,0.0000038044473,0.0013934232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981824,0.0011966603,0.000051156418,0.00010691992,0.00013637003,0.00032646026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640983,0.0021524245,0.0003546378,0.00038564115,0.00040154025,0.0002958084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001545933,0.0002536115,0.0003727022,0.001435047,0.004520818,0.0018890719,0.0009963134,0.0010009368,0.0055464073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042823725,0.00019044802,0.00047778577,0.004058782,0.0016149922,0.0009485757,0.0016652618,0.00055263244,0.00044745594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001244203,0.002435152,0.76708347,0.00054929487,0.00019720374,0.019886583,0.0894363,0.0105294725,0.0016681497,0.029169207,0.0047890637,0.07301185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017030229,0.0011323958,0.53143144,0.0001570431,0.00017281102,0.005281173,0.40979522,0.017905973,0.0019816821,0.004839259,0.027056197,0.0000765264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057392523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16639337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057392523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017251052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011190461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11411697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383213518","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102642","title":"Electoral outcomes and satisfaction with democracy: A comparison of regional and national elections","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); National election; Political economy; Quality (philosophy); Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.1602063671754859,"score_gpt":0.45094419003783204,"score_spread":0.2907378228623462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383213518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979684,0.000079163365,0.000026037404,0.000054489345,0.000005578904,0.0000042745583,0.000120022014,0.0000014060312,0.0017406252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993345,0.0000352344,0.000012957129,0.000011682058,0.000008391689,0.0000035057371,0.00018550295,0.0000018407251,0.0004063517],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985273,0.00074023753,0.000094343384,0.000117584575,0.0001636052,0.00035688007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99183077,0.0025616558,0.002655817,0.00041336543,0.00090714055,0.001631324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024746081,0.00014212348,0.00051237096,0.0013228015,0.0006363474,0.0016221852,0.0003813735,0.0004373465,0.0071635107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105059715,0.00013595232,0.0006919338,0.0020022,0.0005795319,0.0008613006,0.0010800343,0.00056558615,0.0006671234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008921256,0.0002752731,0.9914409,0.000028592593,0.00020611989,0.00006805064,0.001096281,0.00013958014,0.00013850804,0.000425219,0.0003577029,0.0049315714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014628157,0.00020254264,0.99736315,0.000004783677,0.000039528695,0.000034925826,0.001762519,0.00011124594,0.000046169276,0.000055047418,0.0003617839,0.0000036503075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006097888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0121821165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071635107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043471673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003657952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023964405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385224253","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102649","title":"The effects of personal campaign financing on party defection: Evidence from Brazil","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Personalism; Autonomy; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Business; Public relations; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.09168779933786238,"score_gpt":0.40389006826580653,"score_spread":0.31220226892794417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385224253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890665,0.00063496013,0.000061805295,0.0008513986,0.000005928102,0.000014843076,0.00023977204,0.000003900006,0.009120948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992599,0.0002506596,0.000020824802,0.00002325278,0.0000063376096,0.0000037519635,0.00006230397,0.0000015681164,0.00037140207],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810326,0.0008171073,0.00007391146,0.00013861123,0.0002583402,0.00060877076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752627,0.013185453,0.0073246364,0.0012180189,0.0012587688,0.0017504657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002828257,0.00023239394,0.00049402274,0.0018837631,0.0013782785,0.0013586351,0.0006310599,0.0006217157,0.0059642284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018031122,0.00021513845,0.000343807,0.0026596095,0.001961708,0.00074726273,0.0014679751,0.0008753739,0.0002330034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022414474,0.0003286533,0.959049,0.0002142924,0.00019623998,0.00030553067,0.005818587,0.00027496988,0.00038743476,0.007028157,0.0006653614,0.025507579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003479407,0.00012370663,0.9882433,0.00011462836,0.00017560339,0.0001188371,0.006027313,0.00041492112,0.000257811,0.0008201989,0.003661525,0.000007450219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06368728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11010352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06368728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001525447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002094787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12663311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385657738","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102648","title":"The education and income voting divides in Canada and their consequences for redistributive politics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Université du Québec à Montréal; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Political Science Association","keywords":"Voting; Cleavage (geology); Elite; Redistribution (election); Political science; Redistribution of income and wealth; Politics; Democracy; Political economy; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Unemployment","score_opus":0.06755846940226314,"score_gpt":0.37905700633397027,"score_spread":0.31149853693170715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385657738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96455824,0.0012070168,0.000118391305,0.0068625896,0.000043918055,0.000029738527,0.0014364084,0.000011324433,0.025732357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927039,0.0002989703,0.000068839676,0.0002022429,0.000012716934,0.000008297574,0.0002433232,0.0000096861295,0.00645216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484503,0.0005024505,0.00008449035,0.0002943695,0.0009148196,0.0033588137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893244,0.0023558827,0.0010364766,0.00024058892,0.003293594,0.0037491077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003021774,0.00026647002,0.0008724815,0.0051318267,0.0149569465,0.006176451,0.002096554,0.0011977694,0.016165411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014150252,0.00027740607,0.000674063,0.010428308,0.0064350227,0.001760066,0.0034285074,0.0024886215,0.0005389148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080247474,0.00029615875,0.8164241,0.000109613706,0.00012960836,0.00039364095,0.030780159,0.0011491402,0.00026648058,0.07412405,0.012773795,0.06275089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004831631,0.00003329709,0.94096154,0.00010652986,0.00005282857,0.000053202915,0.03974291,0.0009013974,0.00017635625,0.003921658,0.013956516,0.000045585613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99696213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09190587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09190587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.098422915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66682684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386553764","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102677","title":"Revisiting Clarke and Stewart’s (1995) investigation of PM approval and vote intentions in the UK","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Popularity; Politics; Voting; Political science; Prime (order theory); Positive economics; Economics; Econometrics; Law","score_opus":0.14164000429347665,"score_gpt":0.393517641980011,"score_spread":0.2518776376865344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386553764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89497495,0.0045937453,0.0020349785,0.018915946,0.0005612969,0.00014323823,0.0017700866,0.000013075221,0.07699268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838562,0.0011765971,0.000629533,0.002183342,0.00014626162,0.00008390364,0.0002553671,0.000011744457,0.011657029],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956976,0.002359952,0.00034629038,0.0002972144,0.0007870852,0.00051194825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96695954,0.024597561,0.0023901567,0.0013244501,0.0040636794,0.0006646559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041770837,0.00029589812,0.00037085847,0.0030058827,0.0021118915,0.003788496,0.00071576465,0.00082501885,0.009010809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036062825,0.0002808529,0.00039079494,0.0055013457,0.0015571015,0.0019547234,0.0029516728,0.0012836991,0.0011237705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003916402,0.0003846433,0.6131984,0.0014782476,0.00017197817,0.00096217234,0.12265775,0.00041254514,0.0007538089,0.07521207,0.040817283,0.14355943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003029377,0.00027212314,0.7705217,0.0009157975,0.00013617314,0.0003445547,0.096188255,0.0005149831,0.0007700327,0.0044028596,0.12585859,0.000044594322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15397383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32197794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15397383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00275925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035137716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3061552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386996164","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102676","title":"Weaponizing post-election court challenges: Assessing losers’ motivations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Negotiation; Legitimacy; Democracy; Politics; Government (linguistics); Petitioner; General election; Kenya; Vulnerability (computing); Public administration; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court; Computer security","score_opus":0.17648507481869863,"score_gpt":0.3995127728387146,"score_spread":0.22302769802001599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386996164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97370267,0.00011130492,0.0003823749,0.001648329,0.000032398744,0.000056704044,0.000041219562,0.000004232972,0.024020813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720275,0.000048622114,0.00012518892,0.00017027656,0.000017458897,0.00002330642,0.000032233453,0.00000507646,0.002375086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562234,0.0017045924,0.0001773873,0.00025063186,0.0010267129,0.0012182312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778813,0.0090200715,0.0061852373,0.0007534033,0.0021811137,0.0039789714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006742565,0.00023255708,0.00041151882,0.0027005444,0.003840044,0.005650288,0.0009940236,0.001831232,0.0073355976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034387257,0.00025609188,0.00021291456,0.0011337154,0.0024362656,0.0024512818,0.0035705685,0.0026673211,0.0005825237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046986557,0.0009967182,0.83760256,0.00012946862,0.00011455799,0.0006704293,0.06286535,0.00047507268,0.0010296119,0.04616322,0.006804508,0.04267863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047850048,0.00035278022,0.62814516,0.00017857994,0.00006650916,0.0004645958,0.32123652,0.0022358317,0.0006904375,0.016408423,0.030103412,0.00006983593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034403382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010347193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073355976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010650032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002017095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03565854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387807484","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102711","title":"Populism in Canada: Something old, something new","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Psychological nativism; Political science; Political economy; Distrust; Authoritarianism; Politics; Parliament; Public opinion; Public administration; Democracy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.11969209563415334,"score_gpt":0.3881934807500114,"score_spread":0.2685013851158581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387807484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51575315,0.037693992,0.0004040856,0.3323502,0.0011203878,0.000054025302,0.001867892,0.000042900876,0.11071344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618193,0.008703158,0.00020755192,0.012557755,0.0003017335,0.000021405323,0.0002955573,0.000030781248,0.016062794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947025,0.00044403845,0.00008165446,0.00028382245,0.0012313282,0.003256611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923867,0.0012916753,0.00049568247,0.00021731433,0.003018079,0.0025905385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034164607,0.00034827326,0.00089510373,0.004637305,0.021612823,0.009288671,0.0022776513,0.0034230538,0.010640316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009008791,0.00028964097,0.0004171004,0.01302995,0.012835109,0.004141293,0.0037487384,0.005066924,0.00036737113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002785298,0.00023027202,0.18077616,0.0008636844,0.00020073185,0.0007299141,0.113649875,0.00069158897,0.000481937,0.36767504,0.19014351,0.14427881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054193657,0.00006138359,0.3301138,0.0012813568,0.000108438966,0.00016704113,0.2746397,0.0008331191,0.0004978868,0.020378515,0.37165546,0.00020915875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99853957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11838487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11838487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20940712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8589463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388508519","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102712","title":"Are women election averse?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Representation (politics); Politics; Political science; Competition (biology); General election; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Public relations; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.1259231947246369,"score_gpt":0.40893434335726786,"score_spread":0.283011148632631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388508519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85383886,0.0030361488,0.0007633117,0.056391634,0.0007189785,0.00004207375,0.0002995691,0.000025397674,0.08488407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916626,0.000762823,0.00008128731,0.0027113606,0.0002630195,0.000013868648,0.000045572615,0.000011199439,0.0044482555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758804,0.00095249206,0.000055691595,0.00018218234,0.0003028866,0.0009187791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98674494,0.0060587707,0.0041864607,0.0005567693,0.00088960544,0.0015634397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044310004,0.00017235876,0.00037934133,0.00094103615,0.0015719389,0.0034774854,0.0004901537,0.0021100473,0.021507775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03491633,0.00032387374,0.00021568642,0.0007274266,0.0019950105,0.0022664303,0.0009712351,0.0018248396,0.0022182232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015042821,0.0009600458,0.6570341,0.0003311864,0.0002557049,0.0012166292,0.020199502,0.00027218892,0.0012461942,0.04631598,0.033443127,0.23722109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016600535,0.0006503253,0.7277874,0.00053597405,0.00023227061,0.0018716364,0.080153435,0.00072604895,0.0013465382,0.054462593,0.13199961,0.00006827689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027400572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004516689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021507775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004969969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008159629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071950674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389497203","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102717","title":"Still sacrificial lambs? Yes! Minority groups in Canadian federal elections, 2015–2021","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Diversity (politics); Indigenous; Politics; Racial diversity; Minority group; Intersectionality; Race (biology); Demographic economics; Public administration; Ethnic group; Gender studies; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06964776523357982,"score_gpt":0.3861933462238704,"score_spread":0.3165455809902906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389497203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8013666,0.006150396,0.0003121246,0.10470098,0.0014338554,0.00012543557,0.00636055,0.000057483223,0.07949248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632608,0.0009962862,0.000121439465,0.0037823883,0.00013774459,0.000030593226,0.0008416749,0.000022501545,0.03080646],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950157,0.00024641762,0.00007608762,0.00024038501,0.0011443457,0.0032770664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99171054,0.00045515943,0.0005807543,0.00021235463,0.0039789374,0.0030622184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046828934,0.00024193001,0.0005893922,0.002020048,0.017580984,0.005198376,0.0019275867,0.0019863227,0.013533078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0108849155,0.00028637476,0.00045956342,0.0042721434,0.0026206719,0.0021889212,0.002595423,0.003573467,0.00086147717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064718904,0.0002287881,0.375182,0.00028905232,0.0001298653,0.00021282182,0.044836648,0.00040155498,0.0005489038,0.050865702,0.41665578,0.110001795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029147568,0.000042878448,0.69794816,0.00016878628,0.000049003855,0.000043926102,0.07337136,0.0002980541,0.00027879048,0.0009189779,0.22677621,0.000074765005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99574226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067532845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067532845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11623122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48998737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391908148","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102747","title":"Limited supply: Youth underrepresentation in the Canadian House of Commons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"House of Commons; Political science; Commons; House of Representatives; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.19554379320768903,"score_gpt":0.41159499599386035,"score_spread":0.21605120278617132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391908148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95090455,0.00080200547,0.00064853684,0.0040188325,0.00006522264,0.000070857604,0.010659719,0.000030474925,0.03279985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920122,0.00024171881,0.00015267027,0.0002701956,0.000013450079,0.000025169307,0.0023336853,0.000014065134,0.0049367314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538815,0.00047849116,0.00012201612,0.0003648545,0.0018522727,0.0017941922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934455,0.0009183921,0.0015046059,0.00049381476,0.002617441,0.0010201564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033764776,0.00023481723,0.0004392557,0.0033549962,0.0055349283,0.0028346665,0.0013423477,0.0005499408,0.009213617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012454748,0.00020742713,0.00032727435,0.0075935056,0.0016771124,0.0010957259,0.0024129832,0.00093679235,0.0007025057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016807346,0.00005644599,0.86944276,0.00012681576,0.0000526531,0.00023720789,0.028458962,0.0002906781,0.00031449163,0.010300992,0.035212964,0.055337917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009807672,0.000019969999,0.9162482,0.00014817723,0.000030566614,0.00008259081,0.036507525,0.00091605005,0.00042197722,0.0013216325,0.044250973,0.000042405743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98067987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99246746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027188636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027188636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02455982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1972683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399375810","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102812","title":"The (non)-religious voter in Canadian elections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Université de Sherbrooke","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.027896605884601924,"score_gpt":0.40495723527882366,"score_spread":0.37706062939422175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399375810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.968327,0.0009658537,0.00017823304,0.0014896452,0.00005112729,0.000046043293,0.0046515116,0.000011916662,0.024278631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99552745,0.0002809767,0.00008159937,0.00008892941,0.0000115413095,0.000008017611,0.001006942,0.000005292469,0.0029893443],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760383,0.00028841244,0.000065530345,0.00025749116,0.00062710413,0.0011576891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628794,0.00054081617,0.00073057204,0.00015473156,0.0013060278,0.0009799054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017267098,0.00022893935,0.00048107043,0.002665447,0.0055707567,0.0025554833,0.0009505783,0.0005399012,0.006271379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007911161,0.00019921218,0.000474647,0.0058871354,0.0011913315,0.0007234415,0.0017726456,0.0011741952,0.00044691865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022244344,0.00006751335,0.95420533,0.00009502839,0.000076427095,0.0001405739,0.0071455557,0.00052316627,0.00025850986,0.0075689247,0.008842216,0.020854287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007151938,0.000014100775,0.9810682,0.00004749463,0.000028890008,0.00003505954,0.007876314,0.0005284514,0.000095048024,0.00031205793,0.009960359,0.000026877493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99307513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99790466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027638568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027638568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022257242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2005328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400535817","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102829","title":"Are young candidates “sacrificial lambs”? Evidence from the 2012, 2017, and 2022 French legislative elections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"NOMINATE; Legislature; Politics; Political science; Young adult; Demographic economics; Political economy; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Developmental psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.11853289438935842,"score_gpt":0.40151504074355693,"score_spread":0.2829821463541985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400535817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99455345,0.0006548233,0.00006574567,0.00057074195,0.00001600612,0.000005700211,0.0005425643,0.0000020457549,0.0035889177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984484,0.00023319059,0.000018259378,0.00009845908,0.000029731513,0.000004461001,0.00040029595,0.000001804917,0.00076537364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968135,0.0012202576,0.000172414,0.0003512829,0.00052759185,0.0009150226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98806506,0.0031742144,0.0056153145,0.00043383363,0.0014008048,0.001310734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040756096,0.00020899127,0.00038658158,0.0018395513,0.0013118647,0.0014954238,0.000517558,0.00062276656,0.0044560432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008799464,0.00016663164,0.00038855715,0.0020191723,0.00087419816,0.00073517865,0.0011085633,0.0005599577,0.0008592735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019035743,0.000030693343,0.98276246,0.000055238692,0.00005183181,0.000117393975,0.0067261783,0.00002492497,0.00013445686,0.0004872058,0.001226567,0.008192556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038117491,0.000054112756,0.99091816,0.000025568177,0.00001540282,0.000060155427,0.006234417,0.000031801665,0.000058840546,0.00003159848,0.002560534,0.000005566553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07707237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14041424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07707237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091044244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078021386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15324754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400615015","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102824","title":"The unswayed voter: How a polarized electorate responds to economic growth","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.050918301208703214,"score_gpt":0.38811330509232017,"score_spread":0.33719500388361695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400615015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9274231,0.00018594196,0.0005094336,0.009808485,0.00013523528,0.0000116948295,0.00005881211,0.000009723708,0.06185755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731296,0.000085172425,0.00007158317,0.00035105876,0.000039449016,0.0000049126497,0.000018120616,0.0000078931225,0.0021087697],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813807,0.0013009665,0.000025557505,0.00009828655,0.0001255415,0.00031155493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934109,0.0037703458,0.0008448695,0.00031503968,0.0005987452,0.0010600908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023685014,0.00012350288,0.0001907064,0.0010664043,0.0027632879,0.005691995,0.00040395107,0.0014510605,0.009614709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013808742,0.00016789125,0.00020076493,0.00095436967,0.0023029023,0.0018036548,0.0022510374,0.0013564231,0.00077205687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017026984,0.00081603933,0.5538399,0.00030038852,0.00017766263,0.0021370987,0.105173334,0.0027343477,0.006055335,0.19788273,0.026576713,0.10260374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001072563,0.00031152088,0.41818166,0.00021262241,0.00017791073,0.0005651576,0.40693614,0.0076378877,0.002307725,0.08655702,0.07692378,0.00008131594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005183975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009527645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009614709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010262002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009222298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032164395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400853363","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102834","title":"The Political Representation of Young Adults: Explaining youth's underrepresentation in parties, candidacies and parliaments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.10780426411152189,"score_gpt":0.4067444805972224,"score_spread":0.2989402164857005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400853363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972006,0.00010792636,0.000033285356,0.00030111693,0.000009973179,0.000004844684,0.000051132527,8.628017e-7,0.0022902691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990576,0.00010219079,0.000017279299,0.00005784483,0.00000763416,0.0000052293726,0.000045713055,0.0000013925237,0.00070516893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784684,0.0007778285,0.00014296369,0.00011462428,0.00036667913,0.0007510075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917075,0.002858902,0.0027028695,0.00029658232,0.0012287521,0.0012053733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035214068,0.00011369345,0.00025425552,0.0017799092,0.0019089773,0.0024271472,0.0004913232,0.0006797208,0.0038017952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011696989,0.00026493586,0.0002594475,0.0019746153,0.0011364932,0.0012555579,0.0016001634,0.0010009087,0.00040641965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009395338,0.00006891445,0.9161886,0.000032615964,0.00001889346,0.000168155,0.07128682,0.000023121082,0.0002442971,0.0017359949,0.0008539803,0.00928472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005871252,0.000049092214,0.83426535,0.00007394677,0.000024769679,0.00018464078,0.16085654,0.00012384992,0.00027090372,0.00036505153,0.0037732872,0.0000066701855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04921418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06812866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04921418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010596914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011400181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09785545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401841929","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102848","title":"Cultural sources of gender gaps: Confucian meritocracy reduces gender inequalities in political participation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Meritocracy; Politics; Inequality; Political science; Gender studies; Gender equality; Gender gap; Sociology; Demographic economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.22049479704679165,"score_gpt":0.4358736646470374,"score_spread":0.21537886760024577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401841929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851929,0.00013648272,0.0001535099,0.00057502184,0.000009367764,0.000005308695,0.000017175422,0.0000027921549,0.01390751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994586,0.000021884342,0.000040492294,0.000027949582,0.0000024222522,0.0000019027349,0.0000055684045,8.174513e-7,0.0004404072],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989642,0.00040906423,0.000027075126,0.00012146861,0.00017211647,0.00030615152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988207,0.00033997698,0.0003623078,0.00011123865,0.00012061319,0.00024510355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012893621,0.00015105144,0.00020564083,0.00051575166,0.0019991961,0.0013761381,0.00043878364,0.00029467297,0.0053084046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035561146,0.00008273674,0.00010760404,0.000682195,0.0022202355,0.00064426346,0.0019299698,0.00042334443,0.00019374651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036437804,0.00043806212,0.60417193,0.00021308883,0.000080241996,0.0012485721,0.18584144,0.0004080696,0.0051064366,0.06268476,0.0033031662,0.13613982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024639434,0.00016718567,0.88720554,0.0001596018,0.000051246338,0.00030502616,0.08103286,0.00073438365,0.0021714035,0.010637778,0.017490061,0.000020362662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01026881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025544172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01026881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013146808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002799224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020418048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402754400","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102865","title":"Speech targeting and constituency representation in open-list electoral systems","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Public administration; Computer science; Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.14618689165382065,"score_gpt":0.46908396288966947,"score_spread":0.3228970712358488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402754400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910527,0.000060935854,0.00034295145,0.00029491386,0.000006750953,0.0000095523565,0.00008245282,0.0000066724742,0.008143111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987006,0.0000121273315,0.000051925814,0.000020130472,0.0000075569014,0.0000061659753,0.000055949986,0.0000022189427,0.0011433543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507564,0.0029368307,0.00020459686,0.00035906737,0.0004377739,0.0009861446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776928,0.013625986,0.0041810507,0.0010680476,0.0015161216,0.0019161497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004695158,0.00015535863,0.00039179184,0.002042757,0.0023904503,0.004645136,0.0006574666,0.0009805859,0.011278584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03024811,0.00022915423,0.00024755814,0.002321723,0.0014173039,0.0025458944,0.003256216,0.0008448794,0.0012288404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020627377,0.0008770225,0.8575088,0.00012733415,0.00016282899,0.00034769264,0.039915077,0.002324305,0.0026103873,0.03974743,0.002378433,0.05193789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006487988,0.00037503664,0.9481952,0.000052389376,0.00007216886,0.00013843735,0.030012388,0.0055317245,0.0009666743,0.010565429,0.00400036,0.000025288033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061120046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011216979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011278584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001227298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007958391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037730575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402906264","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102864","title":"Does a voter's decision to sit out an election depend upon where others stand?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.06706123675440784,"score_gpt":0.4269489897016348,"score_spread":0.35988775294722697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402906264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98796743,0.000099564095,0.0019626024,0.0006692786,0.000014811914,0.000029333996,0.00027282056,0.00001115208,0.008973011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998109,0.00004863684,0.00023200041,0.000040681614,0.000022843004,0.000013499162,0.000161026,0.0000050466506,0.0013672069],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980617,0.00083904056,0.0000929861,0.00040699242,0.00018480048,0.0004144829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816166,0.011405634,0.0041328403,0.0010244298,0.00056644,0.0012540412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004740932,0.00019095422,0.0008483314,0.000797496,0.0006683558,0.0022902002,0.0008353824,0.00087634067,0.011345749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01792922,0.00018212263,0.00061338744,0.0011438347,0.0012191887,0.0015500091,0.001068771,0.0010765792,0.0017953841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013885015,0.00054634886,0.93743575,0.00012815742,0.00047777378,0.0002494993,0.0018004497,0.0035024716,0.0016716593,0.015542717,0.00090653764,0.03635025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086371765,0.0006937139,0.9592688,0.00004143918,0.00027688564,0.00021543526,0.004651416,0.009889441,0.0010704345,0.019543422,0.0042077345,0.000054905006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028792748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048008547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011345749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047835676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041174702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037955284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411117874","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102953","title":"Wrong place or wrong party? LGBTQ2S+ candidates and district competitiveness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University; Canadian Political Science Association; Princeton University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.05570237901484839,"score_gpt":0.3940373885629436,"score_spread":0.33833500954809526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411117874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747662,0.0002763656,0.000614074,0.0020602623,0.000026215863,0.00002767656,0.0015862732,0.000016151957,0.020626659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763155,0.000043102893,0.000082861596,0.000064541295,0.0000062216886,0.0000069988296,0.00029717945,0.0000050890767,0.0018624339],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976981,0.00028719305,0.000056735113,0.0002558165,0.00041972095,0.0012824263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975116,0.00029871895,0.0007225638,0.00016695299,0.00043910916,0.0008610144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013302744,0.00012186719,0.00039822143,0.0010872481,0.0030095663,0.0022259557,0.00082104234,0.00033136393,0.014017887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055470834,0.00012342905,0.00030607553,0.0030363682,0.0020132314,0.0006336533,0.0018837983,0.0008606964,0.0009477725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019312133,0.000031576954,0.9543595,0.00006882375,0.00004559248,0.00016222715,0.0073463167,0.00041018327,0.00041685178,0.013866242,0.0055795563,0.017520085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014478798,0.00002954734,0.9713774,0.00004436402,0.000017488332,0.000053361153,0.016694035,0.00032101627,0.00014513962,0.001128306,0.010160809,0.000014165239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64346516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7788178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64346516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057155406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059007644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71726906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416881421","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.103019","title":"The rural-urban cleavage in US presidential elections: Stability and sudden change","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cleavage (geology); Democracy; Presidential system; Voting; Presidential election; Survey data collection; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.08981040668505379,"score_gpt":0.40015228464884994,"score_spread":0.31034187796379614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416881421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961564,0.00014979696,0.00012111126,0.00070157053,0.000011047364,0.0000050699346,0.00016702233,0.000004989205,0.0026830442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995622,0.000036254598,0.000020122263,0.000035834953,0.000012223838,0.0000019783324,0.00010992771,0.0000019107406,0.00021947426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992981,0.00020628139,0.000043809905,0.00014108846,0.00012115768,0.00018950578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99578285,0.00094790984,0.0017844277,0.0002736986,0.0005379332,0.0006731332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017142865,0.00008573592,0.00023204059,0.0015182442,0.0010661818,0.001610851,0.00039766982,0.00048521336,0.004498803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074761324,0.00015459051,0.00015175769,0.0017665303,0.001279118,0.0013776236,0.0016809193,0.0008907274,0.0005834005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033014524,0.00011192185,0.96105987,0.000034821816,0.000045173274,0.00016828689,0.009606143,0.00023442661,0.0010213893,0.004672138,0.0019679414,0.020747798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033629583,0.000037193524,0.99328434,0.000009924447,0.0000043355253,0.000038051225,0.004232,0.00021633752,0.00011878093,0.0005965152,0.0014534488,0.000005681179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007117323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017535005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007117323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008139485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044000757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015049994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W750601527","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.06.004","title":"Refining vote choice in an ethno-regionalist context: Three-dimensional ideological voting in Catalonia and Quebec","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Voting; Dimension (graph theory); Political science; Salient; Context (archaeology); Politics; Voting behavior; Political economy; Democracy; Sociology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.22587839774607427,"score_gpt":0.4305851226910416,"score_spread":0.20470672494496733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W750601527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968093,0.000091376176,0.00014725675,0.00011391084,0.0000040102886,0.000015006256,0.0003819269,0.0000023685177,0.0024348083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826616,0.000024864734,0.00017744394,0.000015877531,0.0000016302841,0.000014483277,0.0003546793,0.0000033340425,0.0011415145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871755,0.0006201523,0.000034760775,0.00015801407,0.00011559499,0.00035396917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980515,0.0007102257,0.00019069854,0.00012152442,0.00067007117,0.00025599063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019540444,0.00030235187,0.00063604664,0.0021341578,0.0026412508,0.0030856307,0.0012794604,0.00067967316,0.0045574503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037173936,0.00017780904,0.0005613613,0.00397484,0.0016854585,0.0008352626,0.0020177613,0.00075371366,0.0003169505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007692804,0.00032348605,0.9029962,0.0001522142,0.00032133557,0.00054970756,0.041092332,0.006612902,0.0014937756,0.006725014,0.0043648216,0.034599025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021627891,0.000037309037,0.9413527,0.000041476214,0.00004136829,0.000019427722,0.049543764,0.0048527545,0.00017758165,0.00035945527,0.0035218624,0.000030616025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9575984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98492765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04240161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017353209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006122601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12590694},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"}]}