{"meta":{"query_hash":"114f9f82ddfd","filters":{"venue":"Electoral Studies"},"cohort_total":69,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":69,"exported":69,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/114f9f82ddfd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Electoral+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1163814443","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.08.006","title":"Regional variation in voter turnout in Europe: The impact of corruption perceptions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Language change; Legislature; Ballot; Political science; Socioeconomic status; Government (linguistics); Multilevel model; Perception; Voter turnout; Politics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Economics; Voting; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.14657867767999405,"score_gpt":0.40247721569096184,"score_spread":0.2558985380109678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1163814443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959804,0.00019964804,0.000015241257,0.0021417767,0.00018168318,0.00012737553,9.847568e-7,0.0000105788395,0.0013423379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897766,0.00012421081,0.000030640535,0.000051486273,0.00008130845,0.0000134863685,0.0000019708682,0.00000278136,0.0007164373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999327,0.00014283882,0.00017822467,0.00009224225,0.00011794163,0.0001417475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996679,0.000050063634,0.000060252638,0.00005257066,0.00014085142,0.000028407752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071069936,0.000054173022,0.000109204826,0.00007299006,0.0000868532,0.000015487167,0.00007728295,0.000025217567,0.000075585274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002689637,0.00003784318,0.000028070694,0.00037333352,0.00009132027,0.00011343177,0.00002592318,0.00007172731,0.000040928266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058519825,0.00007312223,0.9078304,0.0000019269783,0.00002486882,8.279295e-7,0.08200874,0.0005711941,0.00012426883,0.00081309036,0.00345495,0.00503807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021037465,0.00003889919,0.9940223,0.000010819383,0.0000018375714,3.3097305e-7,0.0029642987,0.0000929278,4.0974575e-7,0.0002679651,0.0023388756,0.000050940693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010134554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05026373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08619191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058449764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022496567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99645704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967434382","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2009.07.001","title":"Political judgments, perceptions of facts, and partisan effects","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; University of New Brunswick; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Perception; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Axiom; Test (biology); Political science; Psychology; Positive economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.042026198161703145,"score_gpt":0.4143547376118129,"score_spread":0.37232853945010974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967434382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98620987,0.00201679,0.000009619952,0.0046332516,0.00023419382,0.00010425252,0.0000014378197,0.000036184596,0.006754408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870795,0.00009843653,0.00004303745,0.00058384385,0.00019794375,0.0000036450106,5.236145e-7,0.0000022215083,0.00036239842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992839,0.00010310909,0.000101672995,0.000112063964,0.00011369581,0.00028552316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997055,0.00010294977,0.000025992667,0.000042296255,0.000051294584,0.000071963834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009632956,0.00006243407,0.00016756913,0.000024228759,0.00026873228,0.000009789102,0.000056955112,0.000046602534,0.000034896595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021047324,0.000053268028,0.00003620213,0.000104134895,0.00040389423,0.000058607766,0.000014106194,0.000059760147,0.000009609101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037318187,0.00029193517,0.442153,0.000027973963,0.00017998384,0.0000052506352,0.02209835,4.293693e-8,0.007904305,0.46380615,0.030949563,0.03254612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000229844,0.00050682644,0.967719,0.000023113507,0.000027075517,5.3835174e-7,0.005482232,3.1110505e-7,0.00039743606,0.02007967,0.0054216357,0.0001123112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060666306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010455571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.525566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047972488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001358865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21722071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985106340","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.03.008","title":"A rational or a virtuous citizenry? – The asymmetric impact of biases in votes-seats translation on citizens' satisfaction with democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normative; Respondent; Democracy; Voting; Political science; Antipathy; Politics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.2344208997091653,"score_gpt":0.44239847357018675,"score_spread":0.20797757386102145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985106340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967724,0.00046981676,0.000037768634,0.0016190662,0.000099068966,0.0004554213,0.000010700554,0.00003433738,0.00050141354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949235,0.000013709652,0.000045171553,0.0000523535,0.00020831039,0.0000472685,0.0000048432175,0.000009407186,0.00012657195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981727,0.00045028946,0.00029099084,0.00016759677,0.0005550876,0.0003633201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982777,0.0011090974,0.00012963293,0.00008895866,0.0002909756,0.00010363648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006843422,0.00013370912,0.00026445102,0.0001546421,0.00028764707,0.00003911646,0.000072585804,0.00005848473,0.000029152356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015432555,0.0000742823,0.000066535315,0.0012110041,0.00020036446,0.00017745217,0.0000073685724,0.00012026978,0.00000978845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006621694,0.00007827901,0.98231,0.000011651265,0.00011722679,0.000004125396,0.0027878983,0.0011632304,0.00010280181,0.002625208,0.0011796992,0.008957717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011002512,0.002176854,0.9918326,0.00012159364,0.00004423473,0.0000026354264,0.0005094107,0.00030572567,0.00022527634,0.0033208693,0.0001483286,0.00021220814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06956558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2526839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18311831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048807965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039705256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93663025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000281270","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.007","title":"Referendums and deliberative democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Deliberative democracy; Deliberation; Political science; Democracy; Politics; CLARITY; Direct democracy; Brexit; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; European union; Economics","score_opus":0.28293941586392385,"score_gpt":0.4545444389521537,"score_spread":0.17160502308822984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000281270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98587424,0.0036651276,0.000028341794,0.006434963,0.00028731572,0.00015450614,0.000001507389,0.000082802275,0.0034711794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965773,0.000018451468,0.00011499489,0.00018494077,0.00039058022,0.0000102987215,0.0000010570616,0.0000052233586,0.0026971414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990203,0.00020955176,0.00013014193,0.00013160624,0.00020994844,0.0002984926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993692,0.00011148072,0.000035924764,0.000050414583,0.0002444369,0.00018851997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036922604,0.00007808696,0.00015775807,0.00002298565,0.00039588814,0.000044153523,0.000046142468,0.00004296715,0.000014163001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006657459,0.00006213623,0.000017170882,0.00015578573,0.00020194451,0.0001554477,0.00002693299,0.00007060736,0.000042292224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058129062,0.00006993797,0.4939778,0.000026269832,0.0001915234,0.000008980119,0.030486934,0.0000034847787,0.00025629214,0.36749226,0.096039504,0.011388885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021511915,0.0015224481,0.29711384,0.00015465643,0.00017950528,0.0000058886517,0.013140196,0.000097583565,0.0018286427,0.29191184,0.39042428,0.0014699245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015470769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05978469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29438478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012981045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075721415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004014127","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2011.06.013","title":"The impact of motivational and contextual factors on turnout in first- and second-order elections","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Turnout; Competition (biology); Voting; Political science; Order (exchange); Salient; Voter turnout; Politics; Political economy; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.11988491388459145,"score_gpt":0.38825762167622296,"score_spread":0.2683727077916315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004014127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99792504,0.00077381334,0.0000015135771,0.00023154133,0.000059312217,0.0001494496,0.000005064833,0.000010631677,0.00084364286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957573,0.000027319966,0.000003595705,0.0000140407265,0.000050045648,0.000014988268,6.406378e-7,0.0000036820293,0.00030994535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992704,0.000110604626,0.00016478659,0.00010310685,0.00011593507,0.00023518769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992418,0.00049905636,0.00005597578,0.00004231616,0.000115875526,0.000044925957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002276028,0.000080151025,0.0001455755,0.000038364393,0.0004767123,0.000018473724,0.000040077037,0.00003946959,0.000043689306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053343823,0.00004825054,0.00002744457,0.00019540169,0.00032688805,0.00008508126,0.000014284392,0.000083425526,0.0000012024876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022829636,0.000029465104,0.9805392,0.00000420783,0.000051961946,1.5215146e-7,0.0055315294,0.0000013074501,0.000052764473,0.013166865,0.00046378013,0.0001359182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001309145,0.00026912062,0.9961625,0.0000140385655,0.0000044339677,1.36249e-7,0.0005458503,0.0000074126388,0.00012503949,0.0022444015,0.0004360419,0.000060151087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039785706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22913176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18934605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091863556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048146438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96660846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004949851","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.11.007","title":"Political knowledge, the decision calculus, and proximity voting","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Ballot; Bullet voting; Cardinal voting systems; Focus (optics); Disapproval voting; Politics; Process (computing); Decision process; Political science; Computer science; Voting behavior; Social psychology; Public relations; Psychology; Economics; Management science; Law","score_opus":0.07962281699408218,"score_gpt":0.40970583094881274,"score_spread":0.33008301395473055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004949851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98193026,0.003211745,0.000106098414,0.010453823,0.00029537588,0.00049993215,9.079696e-7,0.000078130455,0.003423744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824035,0.000005054824,0.000053044234,0.00020161255,0.0005589523,0.00007617932,3.2909898e-7,0.000006500365,0.0008579626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985512,0.00026566803,0.00019653165,0.00016802902,0.00021771649,0.0006008649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987417,0.0007257649,0.000036582445,0.000078277946,0.00024694196,0.00017077538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050327246,0.00010030539,0.00016970136,0.000021013366,0.0010570749,0.00011288878,0.00010070284,0.000057817895,0.000044900964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013343387,0.000060114737,0.00003741452,0.00020428315,0.00046739465,0.00020276042,0.00007041255,0.00012446831,0.000114668546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044246694,0.000042990763,0.2299382,0.000020186431,0.000039366307,5.342837e-7,0.0016802442,2.384146e-7,0.00010810799,0.748939,0.009076738,0.010150001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056149636,0.0003148915,0.8236857,0.00018233927,0.00009153152,0.0000038183784,0.00322263,0.00075705856,0.0005535989,0.09293441,0.07701611,0.0006764202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022247443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04035483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65600455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013660647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005238568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027604014","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.030","title":"Electoral accountability in the developing world","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Accountability; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.15664327050040294,"score_gpt":0.433581351244147,"score_spread":0.27693808074374404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027604014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821977,0.0009294323,0.000009920404,0.013675619,0.00026834788,0.00058426266,6.74296e-7,0.00006218211,0.002271839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749625,0.0000049759615,0.00006107632,0.0008879969,0.0004433282,0.0002496849,0.0000010937422,0.0000069328307,0.00084867806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978898,0.0005508965,0.0003021358,0.00020432827,0.00038621327,0.0006666355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905056,0.0004926656,0.00005994309,0.00013737271,0.00020701726,0.000052415173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010034431,0.00013038036,0.00022468435,0.00006739032,0.00055751257,0.00014228777,0.0002487605,0.000049549944,0.00014431962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005169003,0.00008633417,0.00005145308,0.0009566791,0.0002532284,0.00033089585,0.00003142809,0.00018829599,0.00019543625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006862449,0.000041914755,0.94556856,0.000019524941,0.000024795037,0.0000011361217,0.0046339086,0.0000011774542,0.00015185883,0.03585554,0.012140194,0.0015545156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015446595,0.00004834313,0.94895613,0.00003945096,0.000010128631,3.450464e-7,0.0013345161,0.0000099990875,0.00016637861,0.015376693,0.033650752,0.00025281086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16734977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64960057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4822508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004289633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118401316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8381949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039598650","doi":"10.1016/s0261-3794(00)00003-2","title":"Pre-election polls and the dynamics of the 1997 Canadian federal election","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Arts Research Board, McMaster University","keywords":"Political science; Federal election; General election; Polling; Period (music); National election; Primary election; Public administration; Political economy; Politics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03345169477113066,"score_gpt":0.3426728749619733,"score_spread":0.30922118019084266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039598650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769537,0.0009900634,0.000021492173,0.019467888,0.00049265963,0.00043465517,0.0000050111034,0.000026744325,0.0016077711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611664,0.00005981904,0.000003198251,0.00022274212,0.00029893962,0.000030123776,0.0000015314921,0.000006009351,0.0032610078],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869776,0.00037523804,0.00019106606,0.00012236906,0.00022590254,0.0003876917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943703,0.00015176671,0.0000860668,0.000088599765,0.00015406353,0.000082446895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050511066,0.00009058785,0.00017382985,0.00003505342,0.0014998766,0.000055254197,0.0001002683,0.00006331434,0.000016321772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039459523,0.000051872285,0.000058736197,0.0004809575,0.0005030049,0.00009555754,0.000019206607,0.00012696968,0.0000026077382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012972155,0.000028175467,0.8278372,0.000021490248,0.00015654166,6.598877e-7,0.0045369584,0.0000145727945,0.00011449749,0.1564479,0.005749244,0.0049630287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011573423,0.00027692926,0.9256637,0.000081727376,0.00013291063,0.000010048029,0.001426131,0.0011975312,0.00054924446,0.022252066,0.04685088,0.00040148935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83863777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15345892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045112165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016224613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048424507","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2006.01.001","title":"An experimental comparison of question forms used to reduce vote overreporting","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Communication in Education and Healthcare","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Michigan","keywords":"Turnout; Sample (material); Face (sociological concept); Voter turnout; Psychology; National election; Political science; Social psychology; Voting; Law; Sociology; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.19259257316120723,"score_gpt":0.5568222792902369,"score_spread":0.3642297061290296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048424507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925319,0.0046586576,0.000044242795,0.0010127346,0.0004863071,0.00020248539,0.000001975904,0.00006785157,0.0009938307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985684,0.0000013368983,0.00062784954,0.00007704442,0.00015128769,0.0000838444,0.000019222518,0.000010591573,0.00046043424],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898463,0.000096564436,0.00045129878,0.00016869094,0.00012554404,0.0001732938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920154,0.00004750278,0.00023723015,0.00032136735,0.00014750265,0.000044852306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018382852,0.00008843886,0.00021238404,0.00006704491,0.00016947139,0.000010157968,0.00011881359,0.000038474616,0.00007873436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038862145,0.00008364683,0.00003257893,0.00017877173,0.00004475336,0.000060606417,0.000031224714,0.00009225981,0.00001832968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006694724,0.0006995867,0.922933,0.000015411562,0.000036422676,4.3281258e-7,0.014147262,0.000026050211,0.034733847,0.0067973826,0.016620725,0.0039229468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031008694,0.0004808514,0.93984944,0.00003795787,0.000010373619,0.0000028499937,0.012901105,0.000019263505,0.038843982,0.00025137048,0.00711982,0.00017288113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004192956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005883015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016916474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012835643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025531615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63385224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058796927","doi":"10.1016/s0261-3794(00)00018-4","title":"Sovereignty, leadership and voting in the Quebec referendums","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Referendum; Political science; Voting; Sovereignty; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.20693039001311236,"score_gpt":0.37249968809396194,"score_spread":0.16556929808084958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058796927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96369016,0.010172876,0.0000027062779,0.009755291,0.0001260694,0.00014112025,0.0000012257334,0.000028495579,0.016082035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948896,0.0001045129,0.0000045919546,0.00059906754,0.0003297267,0.000010645326,1.5665576e-7,0.000002944625,0.00405871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990129,0.00017258718,0.00010742717,0.000119652614,0.00021588524,0.00037157757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962026,0.0002391507,0.000033467444,0.000049103874,0.000024804807,0.000033201493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005086449,0.000066693116,0.00012700883,0.0000126526,0.00033109097,0.00005127575,0.00011262315,0.000035104866,0.000019320558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043087266,0.000042715397,0.000019883011,0.00018152944,0.00021826461,0.00009672466,0.000024410572,0.00010967914,0.00000975145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005617636,0.000015812106,0.34013987,0.0000114562445,0.000014043414,0.000010679445,0.0069473954,2.143791e-7,0.0000069042353,0.64539504,0.0034580505,0.0039949208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021030704,0.00003703641,0.8042494,0.000074546915,0.0000074724235,0.0000023849257,0.012398769,0.0000035688427,0.000008760178,0.0040756967,0.17877561,0.00015642752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35323456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8392912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64131933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010711949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029250894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6510723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064286289","doi":"10.1016/s0261-3794(99)00061-x","title":"Declining cleavages and political choices: the interplay of social and political factors in the Netherlands","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Voting; Voting behavior; Political economy; Loyalty; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Test (biology); Development economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.13557227588566617,"score_gpt":0.45629697132485847,"score_spread":0.3207246954391923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064286289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96228725,0.0010788189,0.0000024201292,0.034235798,0.0001258984,0.000076004435,0.0000042915244,0.0000066722087,0.002182825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981807,0.00007728895,0.000010231546,0.00088275125,0.00058652327,0.0000137271345,0.0000015753237,0.000002890876,0.00024430716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989094,0.00026824095,0.00018930824,0.00011221716,0.00021005691,0.00031078592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985535,0.001243693,0.000038077913,0.000034547244,0.00009766335,0.00003247804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060501107,0.00008279002,0.00015989479,0.000027686885,0.0007029429,0.0000401733,0.00010398328,0.00003606247,0.000013447713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006722344,0.00004346901,0.000031364438,0.00013243468,0.0008362942,0.00006629999,0.000050527702,0.00011436843,7.2118723e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011232777,0.000027425098,0.5735265,0.000005689084,0.000044763066,3.9780394e-7,0.03515942,1.2755662e-7,0.000008208218,0.39002824,0.0011042972,0.000083685794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011081518,0.00007016386,0.84450966,0.000014516616,0.000020755653,0.0000014021413,0.13078558,0.0000035368241,0.00003304,0.011954021,0.01240727,0.00008925881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053977235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028653894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37807423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004575195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000394034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98907065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065842283","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2009.02.003","title":"The federal election in Canada, October 2008","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Racialization; Presidential election; Political science; White (mutation); Politics; National election; Presidential system; Affect (linguistics); General election; Gender studies; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.04926785578757985,"score_gpt":0.36217780891106577,"score_spread":0.3129099531234859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065842283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718468,0.003536978,0.0000030673866,0.021185178,0.0005378741,0.00022672742,7.9763254e-7,0.000034602388,0.0026279376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971713,0.000042382537,0.000003680935,0.00046254444,0.0003565202,0.00001757329,6.0310776e-7,0.0000033280185,0.0019421051],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986124,0.00020731497,0.000203864,0.00012372296,0.0002966608,0.000556041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953747,0.00017513188,0.000045046923,0.000065872926,0.000105500716,0.000070951304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003364606,0.00008472069,0.00014103958,0.000018974051,0.0010315722,0.00005536515,0.00009130602,0.00003134642,0.000015181733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031128793,0.00005889108,0.000026798343,0.00033226697,0.00007352267,0.00009248174,0.000007265899,0.00012186735,0.000011042064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047594884,0.000042977448,0.8297904,0.0000055313717,0.000045813114,0.0000095127125,0.001327329,0.000025865089,0.00030447484,0.033082005,0.11430805,0.021010438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019090988,0.00011592003,0.8757649,0.000019342831,0.0000064335636,6.1116026e-7,0.0005261128,0.00003043623,0.00033998743,0.0059066233,0.11689339,0.0002053404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9877357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045974486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012290416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005680421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7934124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067087535","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2008.07.007","title":"A general measure of district competitiveness","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Turnout; Margin (machine learning); Measure (data warehouse); General election; Variable (mathematics); Electoral system; Political science; Economic system; Economics; Business; Mathematics; Computer science; Voting; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.14356585341529682,"score_gpt":0.3898526955696818,"score_spread":0.24628684215438496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067087535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99472547,0.0019411222,0.000044235327,0.0007316056,0.00017982324,0.00013552487,0.0000045063093,0.00004296342,0.0021947543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979796,0.000029110459,0.000039267798,0.000043827375,0.00034319606,0.000017903634,0.0000018139532,0.0000051580296,0.0015401471],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988635,0.00021436071,0.00019130908,0.00011445573,0.00032267734,0.00029367107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939054,0.00011587111,0.00006525285,0.00006709366,0.00028837638,0.00007286321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002241106,0.00007898529,0.00023707697,0.000028130375,0.00045334437,0.0000061835626,0.00008459402,0.00004114086,0.00005810512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002746454,0.00006617743,0.00006294301,0.00030086382,0.00041600785,0.0000756083,0.000016049178,0.000056744237,0.00001579015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020286661,0.00006596289,0.9507036,0.000025354924,0.00008422845,0.000005843128,0.002247489,0.0000054734746,0.0012500569,0.043148585,0.0018396499,0.00060347276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043624878,0.00024995545,0.9343379,0.00007468428,0.000040845956,0.000002611477,0.00031917947,0.000011753825,0.004418547,0.0010029587,0.058784086,0.00032119005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017667854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016173977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056944437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001062436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009780134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076034436","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.09.010","title":"Scope conditions of economic voting: The Danish exception?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Scope (computer science); Danish; Economics; Positive economics; Generalizability theory; Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.08771620065684411,"score_gpt":0.41323408464544575,"score_spread":0.32551788398860165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076034436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899181,0.00080510386,0.000012214769,0.005571652,0.00032853,0.00035706678,0.0000047222734,0.00004064304,0.0029619702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794155,0.000013011686,0.000009212264,0.0000964983,0.00040805645,0.00008917532,0.0000019756906,0.000005019348,0.0014354816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991049,0.00017276747,0.00021833609,0.00010142985,0.00013278052,0.00026975348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994002,0.00022864815,0.000091507565,0.00008030488,0.0001454928,0.000053847893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026489663,0.000068012945,0.00015207272,0.000019214951,0.0005903598,0.00004415051,0.00011655234,0.000033238957,0.0005756428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017787622,0.000046875623,0.00005124793,0.00011029571,0.0004140581,0.00016921715,0.00002402919,0.00006015273,0.0003455032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045426873,0.00006225276,0.44768265,0.000033738925,0.00018854934,2.9663326e-7,0.0038859136,0.0000459653,0.0025838783,0.42312542,0.12124532,0.0011414693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046765828,0.00035710857,0.8913262,0.00011426845,0.0001072872,9.53812e-7,0.002775449,0.000097036806,0.0028492361,0.05252208,0.048861675,0.0005210633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038823925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053504936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44364354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012020462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006363637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9675766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077013175","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2010.11.006","title":"Valence politics and economic crisis: Electoral choice in Canada 2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Political science; Politics; Political economy; Voting; Prime minister; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04178338393602016,"score_gpt":0.35226380440405,"score_spread":0.3104804204680298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077013175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931711,0.0011894468,6.651261e-7,0.0044005257,0.00079507125,0.00017097847,0.000012514595,0.000029024011,0.00023066397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873316,0.000022867109,0.000024263749,0.00029997033,0.0005552738,0.000030444051,0.0000016300128,0.00000993927,0.0003224588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984187,0.0001304105,0.00027890794,0.0002449929,0.00020746335,0.0007195572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926287,0.00027438937,0.0000664682,0.00010985416,0.00008378732,0.00020263944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028012117,0.0001415731,0.0002695625,0.00004844865,0.0003824961,0.0000484765,0.00013149205,0.00006711612,0.00007182384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037115824,0.00013574386,0.00002518735,0.00016302649,0.00017962747,0.00017469366,0.00003435945,0.00025427915,0.000015392841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027680055,0.000009488272,0.9796574,0.000014498037,0.000018020388,0.000002892864,0.0003173054,0.0000030219232,0.0001693816,0.0078103794,0.01182876,0.00016608721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035518405,0.000082585735,0.91467714,0.000029459781,0.000026330814,0.00000202879,0.0006035092,0.00007845615,0.0005855688,0.0025811733,0.08050388,0.00047469616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99790317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06867512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085237843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011518927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5535474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078433006","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2011.03.001","title":"Leaders, voters and activists in the elections in Great Britain 2005 and 2010","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Position (finance); Political science; General election; Political economy; Voting; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.21758756681720942,"score_gpt":0.3972908247296066,"score_spread":0.17970325791239716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078433006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928551,0.002089298,0.000002893703,0.0040746406,0.00008615385,0.00020951313,6.33491e-7,0.000015424375,0.0006663581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991692,0.000074450174,0.000014589542,0.00012920109,0.00008866057,0.00003873606,3.1965848e-7,0.000003812308,0.0004810871],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989773,0.00026932583,0.00012918208,0.00014018395,0.00011702069,0.00036696048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997038,0.00014998385,0.000025767698,0.000048988317,0.000024465016,0.000046944693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005068546,0.0000774883,0.0001378296,0.000057688052,0.0002360341,0.000029787008,0.00005425512,0.000046755176,0.0000115905095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017085875,0.000057197132,0.00001401815,0.00024025644,0.0003617659,0.00013682448,0.00001423609,0.00013306842,0.000003356019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014476165,0.00003573568,0.96506375,0.00001117352,0.000015158271,0.0000043925334,0.027954007,1.717316e-7,0.00009554895,0.0035124547,0.002225938,0.0010672027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017911203,0.00008414537,0.98966503,0.000024883526,0.000009269825,0.0000016070867,0.004413707,0.00000608067,0.000053373624,0.002845774,0.0026066864,0.000110318324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09655259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60533077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50877815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086814216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026021022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9094635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079127360","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.005","title":"Does low turnout matter? Evidence from the 2000 Canadian federal election","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal; McGill University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Turnout; Political science; Population; Demographic economics; Voter turnout; General election; Public administration; Economics; Voting; Demography; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04216701789567799,"score_gpt":0.3408536668405069,"score_spread":0.2986866489448289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079127360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659076,0.0034646706,0.000009566962,0.028274093,0.000994062,0.000306899,0.000014720168,0.00007031821,0.0009581185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99172115,0.000022811926,0.000011143759,0.0006905255,0.002303158,0.00005188552,0.000006226889,0.000010248618,0.0051828315],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981925,0.00033495034,0.0002340775,0.000232954,0.0003299424,0.0006755669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917364,0.00032131863,0.00006762771,0.00013084454,0.00017763283,0.00012890637],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035770325,0.00013966823,0.00019302254,0.000031178108,0.0016954367,0.00021151453,0.0001727001,0.000077780154,0.00038981714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025916685,0.00007487883,0.00006530706,0.0002988333,0.00022044466,0.00024448076,0.000016596063,0.00014627012,0.0003133534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006225982,0.0000099961435,0.93357044,0.0000047798303,0.000029143146,0.0000017587242,0.0010294233,0.0000055782816,0.00028097187,0.0005640808,0.06421248,0.00028512886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008375904,0.000040028288,0.95058024,0.00012696226,0.000025946742,2.5870838e-7,0.00019232302,0.0000124857415,0.0005903365,0.004670822,0.04344969,0.0002271536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027583567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008911657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032682717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079953312","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.025","title":"The Kramer problem: Micro-macro resolution with a Danish pool","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Macro; Danish; Political science; National election; Perception; Positive economics; Economics; Public economics; Psychology; Political economy; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04748012977054439,"score_gpt":0.34887637038065417,"score_spread":0.3013962406101098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079953312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96843576,0.0044597182,0.000058303533,0.020535849,0.0002845751,0.0012343186,0.000002351173,0.00017334422,0.0048158006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931069,0.000031679745,0.00013686299,0.00018954284,0.0003759812,0.00026040847,0.0000012498327,0.000010417955,0.005886936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837273,0.00024809953,0.00019836846,0.00017553198,0.00031425722,0.00069100474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991283,0.00022870883,0.00008126374,0.000116695475,0.00033626836,0.00010880627],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041200907,0.000116151066,0.00015677392,0.00001724488,0.0016466526,0.00018893994,0.0001379655,0.00004965361,0.000048221184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020482016,0.0000661125,0.000038252594,0.00028553235,0.00048151886,0.00020635147,0.000029686207,0.000121339435,0.00020253904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013844017,0.00021730152,0.44008574,0.000099202894,0.0007348465,0.0000067775923,0.013477724,0.000029797722,0.0101593165,0.14294751,0.37674725,0.015356099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008666049,0.001115596,0.16660245,0.0002032212,0.00014031756,0.0000043028135,0.0033599532,0.00008359136,0.0028309918,0.025582356,0.7982389,0.00097176735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052436285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11353915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4214916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019255825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008663021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079970571","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.014","title":"Manipulating electoral laws in Singapore","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Dominance (genetics); Authoritarianism; Political science; Hegemony; Political economy; Democracy; Electoral system; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.09881133439723412,"score_gpt":0.3880717933669963,"score_spread":0.2892604589697622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079970571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98626626,0.001162228,0.0000023203477,0.0022534074,0.00051638583,0.0003448196,3.5991204e-7,0.0001321255,0.0093220705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99560595,0.000033822853,0.0008478518,0.00028194013,0.00027774778,0.000086202854,0.0000020327345,0.000015381875,0.00284906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854696,0.00013294382,0.00028381165,0.00024905638,0.00020478468,0.00058246386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994761,0.0001784686,0.00009264612,0.00009203539,0.00009560745,0.000065172055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004426697,0.0001432638,0.00026036258,0.000079111065,0.00046738758,0.00009345728,0.00019938366,0.000074975134,0.00051422784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036001435,0.00014258653,0.00004604007,0.00030819798,0.00020925213,0.00033012842,0.000071377326,0.00016563127,0.00043008864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002101682,0.000020684667,0.97285455,0.000006559202,0.00004006439,0.0000034512302,0.006466695,0.0000033965362,0.00012307985,0.0014663524,0.011852831,0.0071602087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046275597,0.00004840955,0.94689506,0.000060835253,0.000009965241,9.204532e-7,0.010249985,0.000039387935,0.00019841842,0.0068795653,0.034590025,0.0005646828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012985937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045711856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03272592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006522812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010843446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99358666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081436998","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2013.05.003","title":"What are the current preoccupations of economic voting research?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Current (fluid); Voting; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.23367082036630032,"score_gpt":0.3804469898450158,"score_spread":0.14677616947871547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081436998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94733083,0.049128078,0.000023818799,0.001162113,0.0013349089,0.00037108897,0.000013935953,0.000023450102,0.0006117835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986609,0.00034384648,0.000011669339,0.000015436004,0.00022735367,0.000100514684,0.0000013336579,0.000010366865,0.00062854815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896175,0.00008068638,0.00044407469,0.00020782105,0.000034949124,0.0002706976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990082,0.00033739264,0.00031961492,0.00020650223,0.00010204373,0.000026279176],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012532001,0.00009175898,0.00029550964,0.00010523792,0.00029877038,0.00011210851,0.00022342648,0.000023155704,0.00007427844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003410158,0.00007193089,0.00007227275,0.0001576251,0.0001759688,0.00033907505,0.0001030423,0.00019491761,0.0009274811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000772589,0.00006112013,0.75943154,0.00012673275,0.00020339298,1.8269944e-7,0.0020820638,0.00011456394,0.000021308731,0.21693654,0.015557501,0.005457338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007383327,0.00033281895,0.6783294,0.00075427827,0.00002138593,0.0000029092757,0.0081355525,0.002438021,0.0007514877,0.24585243,0.06191095,0.00073244405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003897641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003686404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08110213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103039616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011829198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084833011","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.01.009","title":"The 2014 parliamentary elections in Bulgaria","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Legislature; Political science; General election; Political economy; Extreme right; Public administration; Geography; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.10118492417174667,"score_gpt":0.3848039865413619,"score_spread":0.2836190623696152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084833011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7182146,0.057358872,0.000025880969,0.04147082,0.0032274849,0.00059769396,0.000009168846,0.0002521032,0.17884338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987494,0.0012857434,0.000021456068,0.000580095,0.00038913838,0.000015301475,3.488901e-7,0.0000052864216,0.010208622],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910206,0.0002197007,0.000110900364,0.00010103437,0.00019387733,0.00027244398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959785,0.00015415707,0.000044682853,0.00008059379,0.00006976527,0.00005298059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000635593,0.000058584694,0.00008064041,0.000017906892,0.0006270697,0.00003899912,0.0001537496,0.00001707137,0.000009424788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005799029,0.000040989828,0.00002285669,0.00024678066,0.00024455122,0.00009332013,0.000039827377,0.00010690392,0.00010583671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033316748,0.000042873493,0.16415592,0.0000016708182,0.000051371317,0.000006072082,0.00883014,0.000010634056,0.000021944816,0.08053262,0.74309665,0.003216791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001671558,0.00004370232,0.057099782,0.0000067935707,0.000003759168,3.112047e-7,0.0028261119,0.0000015917014,0.000044461787,0.0036514336,0.93607724,0.00007765542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025234478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2932444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26927942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019074835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009432836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98125654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086013289","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.013","title":"The federal election in Canada, January 2006","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Predictability; Univariate; Bivariate analysis; Predictive power; China; Econometrics; Economics; Robustness (evolution); Stock market; Index (typography); Stock (firearms); Stock market index; Political science; Statistics; Multivariate statistics; Geography; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01782659267636503,"score_gpt":0.2145661142523388,"score_spread":0.19673952157597377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086013289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97162557,0.016839726,0.00003720863,0.0012665491,0.0005094138,0.0001338742,0.000028010307,0.000012557816,0.009547083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973251,0.00013342015,0.000016718408,0.00008363166,0.000101845944,0.000022267694,0.0000048167644,0.0000067120673,0.002305475],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990962,0.000016585323,0.00035744964,0.00019660177,0.000032963777,0.00030020485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996514,0.00008079728,0.00010838429,0.00011695402,0.000026220374,0.000016285907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030602943,0.0000994896,0.00021110887,0.00003852999,0.0002843435,0.000039854312,0.00009164244,0.000023966004,0.000017383893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059642,0.000085290165,0.00003679652,0.00020518815,0.0000302147,0.000057540223,0.00003081348,0.00012053036,0.000007065331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000115834055,0.000011666759,0.9711258,0.00000449128,0.000018759933,0.0000015602621,0.0000070500128,0.000016751279,0.0000022095578,0.0046125795,0.023644937,0.00054265535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015399976,0.000016757534,0.93193877,0.0000028236136,9.199129e-7,6.087444e-7,0.000020078165,0.0051922677,0.0000103176235,0.021586921,0.040951367,0.0001251576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95674086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99825794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04151711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007618332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007329258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3478032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091064756","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.002","title":"One voter, two first-order elections?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"National election; Order (exchange); Political science; Turnout; General election; Voter turnout; Politics; Primary election; Ranked voting system; Public administration; Political economy; Voting; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.18337803252381296,"score_gpt":0.41372182532642615,"score_spread":0.2303437928026132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091064756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97867376,0.0031365438,0.00020604146,0.011455082,0.0007777671,0.00038391727,0.000002832822,0.0003070482,0.0050570024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99258626,0.000089236506,0.00015407172,0.000249227,0.0010629502,0.00006837291,0.0000019763497,0.000011983164,0.005775937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842376,0.00017278166,0.00023666683,0.00021344906,0.0003636116,0.00058976194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916935,0.00017774178,0.00006179079,0.00011406791,0.00034189806,0.00013514928],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024721705,0.00012062468,0.00024772095,0.000055120912,0.0018833174,0.000029503793,0.00010678771,0.00005857452,0.0001488248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051748945,0.00011694915,0.00006430833,0.00062300975,0.00035986595,0.00018258116,0.000026645448,0.00013307117,0.00023770808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054050874,0.0003964762,0.87039155,0.00004948105,0.00039874768,0.000015093399,0.008888048,0.000042169188,0.0009899802,0.054121815,0.062450916,0.0022016955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019301883,0.0009173495,0.36942735,0.00015092715,0.00016042503,0.000012289775,0.0005366761,0.00011525528,0.0026481824,0.019692596,0.60291094,0.001497845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04807194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2140307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025510162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108312095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092468239","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2014.05.002","title":"Fundamental models for forecasting elections at the state level","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Quarter (Canadian coin); Econometrics; Voting; Presidential election; Presidential system; Computer science; Economic forecasting; State (computer science); Economics; Politics; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.37227102893229025,"score_gpt":0.425154844127967,"score_spread":0.05288381519567675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092468239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842381,0.0010167139,0.0052316594,0.0056441575,0.000692159,0.0008059413,0.00003217286,0.00011790806,0.002221204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876892,0.000005417398,0.000096015814,0.00021128469,0.0005423132,0.00019462907,0.000004061545,0.00001113896,0.0112459455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871075,0.00017915558,0.00019487253,0.00016667055,0.00021909221,0.00052946206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900705,0.0005817456,0.0000736443,0.000082350125,0.00018124936,0.00007395106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068720983,0.000101101774,0.00016025682,0.00002160913,0.0022285234,0.000060037866,0.00009612216,0.00003312402,0.000022292581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044291423,0.000069623056,0.00007724226,0.00018230091,0.00022605987,0.0001378991,0.00003780242,0.00006850753,0.000019628058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003843803,0.00034053545,0.21480575,0.00027083966,0.001220091,0.0000016950039,0.045069262,0.006386156,0.0049504763,0.4451151,0.21773376,0.06372196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018725453,0.0015632977,0.016994795,0.00014201681,0.0002573424,0.000005061752,0.0022301548,0.03480705,0.0045625935,0.37023276,0.5659285,0.0014038539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012841384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24838145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34819478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033379544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042208394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094145922","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2009.12.004","title":"Why are highly informed citizens sceptical of referenda?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Skepticism; Voting; Political science; Politics; Democracy; Competence (human resources); Representative democracy; Centrality; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.0978313216538471,"score_gpt":0.4073795205594935,"score_spread":0.3095481989056464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094145922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98966986,0.00019170853,0.0000049661708,0.0055696797,0.0006525885,0.00016558083,0.000007002102,0.00007921275,0.0036593843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981505,0.000008905027,0.00007895183,0.00033552424,0.00057304447,0.000022721295,0.0000022325798,0.00000802632,0.0008200762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986208,0.00010091626,0.00030220635,0.00014388583,0.00036562738,0.00046653594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989493,0.00029650523,0.00012015402,0.00012523422,0.00036024253,0.00014854512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002998274,0.0001126335,0.00029876997,0.000051969517,0.00034458798,0.000028660135,0.00013451341,0.000113274735,0.00019605915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015500134,0.00009120905,0.00007228553,0.00028777102,0.00053422624,0.0001247791,0.00003579436,0.00020473026,0.000046141715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006003981,0.00013620137,0.53202176,0.0001316742,0.000186101,0.0000043438163,0.0039184745,9.020222e-7,0.01004311,0.35740057,0.09464707,0.0014497587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092263066,0.00059525575,0.40644467,0.0001813793,0.00012501045,0.0000020881364,0.0016842998,0.000010330911,0.012472391,0.019915437,0.55685097,0.00079553714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011340571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2768697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4622039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074410964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010699685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121933130","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2011.03.005","title":"Searching for electoral irregularities in an established democracy: Applying Benford’s Law tests to Bundestag elections in Unified Germany","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Benford's law; Democracy; Political science; Precinct; German; Variation (astronomy); State (computer science); Political economy; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Geography; Statistics","score_opus":0.212681193899514,"score_gpt":0.39245947445675816,"score_spread":0.17977828055724415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121933130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99432445,0.00024567987,0.002083848,0.00012093558,0.00030360627,0.0018239736,0.0000109748435,0.0002784986,0.0008080579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867061,0.000006456987,0.011681273,0.00014045197,0.0001584547,0.0009040744,0.000009870462,0.00007146022,0.00032186447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747574,0.00014682086,0.0006294415,0.00050939334,0.00028605838,0.0009525169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873024,0.00041779055,0.00012632535,0.00033521932,0.00025067825,0.00013974227],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007739268,0.00036246367,0.0006031099,0.00047241326,0.00056806346,0.00011920249,0.0002718761,0.00015315386,0.000018777411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042550106,0.00036184076,0.00010437108,0.00096198655,0.000117572956,0.0007575702,0.0001151962,0.00045351931,0.0000054289985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019008971,0.002062535,0.22888497,0.0011713171,0.0004981279,0.000070634975,0.019411007,0.00018745424,0.02519527,0.6974106,0.0017169288,0.021490263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042983135,0.0036591971,0.17927742,0.0005690898,0.00019580942,0.000043869855,0.003707757,0.0017076421,0.02556208,0.77459615,0.0039288127,0.0024538648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006094504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31456372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3084692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004539775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086901295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187826436","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.010","title":"The British general election: Synthetic forecasts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Presidential election; Context (archaeology); General election; Political science; Public opinion; History; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.12797591467368383,"score_gpt":0.39558219403436,"score_spread":0.26760627936067616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187826436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96010154,0.01656733,0.000046699035,0.010506425,0.002213374,0.00041571254,0.0000021730013,0.00021255795,0.009934203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98287475,0.00006465574,0.0000246064,0.00013093432,0.0014140233,0.00006996603,8.9143674e-7,0.00000936639,0.015410817],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839425,0.00030337347,0.00019818963,0.00015892113,0.00038779358,0.0005574639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913704,0.00017804014,0.00005571889,0.00009631209,0.00035534528,0.00017756016],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000783855,0.000088545465,0.00015387833,0.000012532595,0.0025369313,0.0004059322,0.00013403514,0.000051966064,0.000013706037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009877601,0.00006925099,0.000055845685,0.00029904547,0.00034727174,0.00012776439,0.000028980909,0.00009987376,0.00007951751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008973738,0.00013120967,0.16749315,0.00003534933,0.00037351795,0.000027501741,0.0047074943,0.000036633533,0.00014761156,0.10648303,0.6183686,0.102106154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026995305,0.00024509465,0.007832059,0.00003472647,0.000032889526,0.000009012922,0.0006020417,0.00008281305,0.00023146422,0.020425806,0.969967,0.0002671212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058990967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42048198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.361491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002994324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014294569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2434378327","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2016.06.003","title":"Come hell or high water: An investigation of the effects of a natural disaster on a local election","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Natural disaster; Turnout; Flood myth; Flooding (psychology); Natural (archaeology); Population; Political science; Geography; Demography; Sociology; Psychology; Voting; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.01753247608198083,"score_gpt":0.2939381396653146,"score_spread":0.2764056635833338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2434378327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99795645,0.00012173996,0.000018061635,0.0009756705,0.0005773301,0.00023829319,5.446557e-7,0.000019488069,0.00009243321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99544084,0.000025701693,0.0000064569385,0.0000750084,0.00008014719,0.000011655444,3.634207e-7,0.0000040218124,0.0043558166],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906707,0.00020153525,0.00012693925,0.0001294504,0.0002895724,0.00018544054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995979,0.00013530224,0.00007033191,0.00009955591,0.000072776646,0.000024141984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015557422,0.00007874097,0.00013885762,0.000035544985,0.00019658008,0.000010579417,0.00016863276,0.000026166645,0.000009220802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010102705,0.000029883935,0.000037984235,0.00020115156,0.0006853972,0.00017468905,0.000058837006,0.000039530245,0.000005406958],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012274798,0.0004659317,0.34731898,0.0008599179,0.0005846948,0.000006204752,0.092055015,0.000014432816,0.4366841,0.020641157,0.0057324744,0.0944096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017997609,0.0029781496,0.35369977,0.000953197,0.00013805933,4.683004e-7,0.005756214,0.000017870965,0.6245246,0.006780293,0.002901281,0.00045031108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006996079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0083832415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1878405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069864895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017753406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46780455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549592443","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2016.11.010","title":"The role of partisan cues in voter mobilization campaigns: Evidence from a randomized field experiment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Political science; Preference; Mobilization; Heuristics; Phone; Voter turnout; General election; Social psychology; Public relations; Voting; Psychology; Politics; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05122575791456549,"score_gpt":0.38356101462479086,"score_spread":0.33233525671022535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549592443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97247905,0.02370287,0.00002626135,0.0029646184,0.0003437777,0.00030933094,0.0000013575308,0.000017881488,0.00015485204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689496,0.0025117353,0.000023870254,0.000054620203,0.00025228545,0.00013990166,1.5136551e-7,0.0000032396217,0.00011922953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987997,0.00047896692,0.00020596613,0.00009708026,0.0002103538,0.00020794406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449325,0.005240735,0.00007651872,0.00007649955,0.00008400308,0.000029000877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039420408,0.00006315471,0.00024226344,0.000014957857,0.00019493875,0.000014743219,0.00011330329,0.000040748237,0.000029676103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004557889,0.000032774744,0.00005514354,0.00010350786,0.00039514355,0.00008880549,0.000028183276,0.000032641972,0.000004753979],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002982697,0.00006139903,0.7068818,0.0000064491755,0.00020261398,0.0000011896377,0.24103065,5.7763015e-7,0.012770647,0.00772839,0.0012110071,0.027122574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026998235,0.00038029597,0.010833779,0.0012631102,0.00016606598,1.0397252e-7,0.22871554,0.000026081421,0.5278136,0.17601581,0.027109262,0.0006781337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013235343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028550997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.696048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008191204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056790715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572457745","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2017.01.002","title":"Political opportunity structures and the representation of women and visible minorities in municipal elections","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Toronto Metropolitan University; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Candidacy; CONTEST; Victory; Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; Affect (linguistics); Political opportunity; General election; Political economy; Public administration; Demographic economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social movement","score_opus":0.12204168349952257,"score_gpt":0.42048848874968253,"score_spread":0.29844680525016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572457745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99237686,0.00085120235,0.0000010848522,0.0030472071,0.00009313233,0.00012854318,0.000002221802,0.000006084728,0.0034936476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991639,0.00025668336,0.000019931176,0.000036674162,0.00008698116,0.000018798726,5.0040535e-7,0.0000023153236,0.00041417297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921525,0.00016603609,0.000121558274,0.00009978651,0.00013343178,0.00026396618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947613,0.0002002781,0.00006962798,0.0001118585,0.000073111936,0.00006897551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037716186,0.000051051225,0.00015643208,0.000040248433,0.00094819686,0.00007682431,0.000083261744,0.000028898903,0.000006199352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001101422,0.000035872046,0.000016910662,0.000052303974,0.001447516,0.00011802968,0.00007986073,0.000068093475,9.387213e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030141468,0.000012930817,0.399423,0.000017369848,0.000054088552,9.008974e-7,0.041503705,8.3453426e-7,0.000050353177,0.55818725,0.000083011284,0.0006364135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056649745,0.00003508383,0.68253887,0.000006193987,0.000013765672,0.0000010437277,0.06338075,0.000024665218,0.0002096047,0.25287786,0.0002826067,0.000063037114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059701625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030641416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30530939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006885441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054256176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98704684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760318507","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.010","title":"When heuristics go bad: Citizens' misevaluations of campaign pledge fulfilment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Pledge; Heuristics; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Heuristic; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.18902930473505833,"score_gpt":0.4537980593728693,"score_spread":0.264768754637811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760318507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97397804,0.0023580357,0.0001790653,0.007293816,0.0012184759,0.00066985347,0.000039804392,0.000087060136,0.014175822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437314,0.00002480333,0.00017974882,0.000059292415,0.0005339266,0.000047197544,0.0000034217676,0.000009235987,0.0047692447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983911,0.0002297957,0.00032483327,0.00018073819,0.0004504321,0.0004231031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986199,0.00024296957,0.00024222994,0.00028178838,0.00048699908,0.00012611282],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007171638,0.000120453355,0.00029902018,0.000035380857,0.0015662777,0.00008770802,0.00026219248,0.00006582215,0.00018163258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002280047,0.00010542761,0.00008185217,0.00006779623,0.0005454807,0.0001273081,0.0000674307,0.00008463872,0.00006877691],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046395864,0.00021118406,0.73955697,0.00012368814,0.00038708685,0.0000054809925,0.013577871,0.000014408452,0.0014368499,0.13351545,0.10758377,0.0035408272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015647495,0.00079985627,0.7237846,0.00034474855,0.00043560716,9.993972e-7,0.0017235074,0.00019095112,0.004288328,0.099616155,0.16623454,0.0010159509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011979834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043132666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058650766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018125778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014294591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801030683","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.005","title":"Introduction: Personality, party leaders, and election campaigns","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychopathy; Authoritarianism; Machiavellianism; Big Five personality traits; Dark triad; Narcissism; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Great Rift; Personality; Political science; Democracy; Law","score_opus":0.11020691660668049,"score_gpt":0.41940653036503567,"score_spread":0.3091996137583552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801030683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528027,0.0023535786,0.000028644892,0.036277357,0.0026239823,0.00012681219,0.0000010370869,0.00013237663,0.0056534917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98299503,0.00017175199,0.00004052481,0.00059157657,0.0107989935,0.00001340304,9.11231e-7,0.0000052772184,0.0053825183],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911195,0.00015365674,0.00009632804,0.00022332542,0.00014125498,0.00027350002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996386,0.00004158191,0.000037103815,0.00005453619,0.00018085327,0.000047282774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003089075,0.000079698366,0.00013853687,0.000028733826,0.0010452324,0.000029256207,0.00006104735,0.00006145276,0.00041887956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023524516,0.000069871756,0.000032427284,0.00025326633,0.0014823348,0.00012873484,0.00002478356,0.00009302127,0.00007258977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083282284,0.00007015189,0.10066427,0.000011125638,0.0002372738,0.000001445766,0.08575711,2.2413186e-8,0.0014249384,0.014426505,0.7848211,0.012502793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018966994,0.0004648309,0.049573444,0.000006018701,0.000025264919,0.0000036234164,0.02734723,8.6319994e-7,0.00038624776,0.0037548707,0.9180635,0.00018438694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019736413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028579473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13324246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010124073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025148096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883667544","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2018.07.002","title":"What makes people believe that their party won the election?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Parliament; Split-ticket voting; Primary election; Single non-transferable vote; General election; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Test (biology); Whip (tree); Realigning election; Political economy; Law; Politics; Economics; Democracy; Socialism; Geography; Communism","score_opus":0.11360418245056043,"score_gpt":0.39785217414502433,"score_spread":0.2842479916944639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883667544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96835387,0.0053929663,0.000026153893,0.021279719,0.00254561,0.00045646157,0.0000027210644,0.00017283826,0.0017696654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923606,0.000192217,0.000006945828,0.00065013673,0.0022626254,0.00009440836,0.0000019617228,0.000012913659,0.0044181743],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980861,0.00041703336,0.00020415825,0.00024421664,0.0003739264,0.0006745509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893427,0.00036156783,0.0000937035,0.00018327947,0.00032675767,0.00010041613],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071205257,0.0001646148,0.00024525862,0.000031530726,0.0021365937,0.0002679077,0.00020322524,0.00007950622,0.00017061639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000293275,0.00009752208,0.00008838668,0.00051287,0.0005939041,0.0004703012,0.00004846718,0.00014629701,0.00020192086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009411007,0.00015483366,0.7609685,0.000042659573,0.000463632,0.0000018140586,0.06450467,0.0000022194222,0.0010481604,0.045966163,0.11308715,0.0136660775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042294344,0.0008575103,0.27891564,0.00015261771,0.000108270644,0.0000032284581,0.020504916,0.000041782645,0.011377408,0.026563155,0.6603072,0.00074529566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014205017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.437256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5472201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018846443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008022545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916893145","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2019.02.011","title":"What is the cost of voting?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Turnout; Democracy; Bullet voting; Disapproval voting; Public economics; Cardinal voting systems; Voting behavior; Work (physics); Political science; Ranked voting system; Voter turnout; Business; Economics; Politics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.08518817712502742,"score_gpt":0.40818468219446413,"score_spread":0.3229965050694367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916893145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98323834,0.0043336363,0.000003098985,0.009822896,0.00094516197,0.0004039898,0.0000015201105,0.000026269112,0.0012251072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99506146,0.000047800186,0.0000032585551,0.00041017405,0.00021551026,0.000017285933,3.7118124e-7,0.000004333339,0.004239811],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990507,0.00014662452,0.0001624883,0.000102808495,0.0002615765,0.0002758218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992681,0.0003592182,0.000074993,0.00009102608,0.00016946037,0.000037171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041933492,0.00006264527,0.00016196408,0.000014127254,0.00024787235,0.000047262052,0.00011742031,0.000034096665,0.00016266598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019060934,0.000039213744,0.000053789667,0.00021246307,0.00019802875,0.00019025741,0.000026136111,0.00006440437,0.00013009338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012565556,0.000030770752,0.9018317,0.000043107924,0.00010639407,2.890611e-7,0.010064362,0.0000051454376,0.0005529734,0.071485445,0.01311677,0.0027504729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007193808,0.00057381036,0.33799225,0.0004553539,0.00011520428,6.73998e-7,0.013640492,0.00012498644,0.0099903075,0.0077421954,0.62800545,0.00063987134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007937125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016311888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61488867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006329646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039120576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980233304","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102070","title":"The measurement of electoral competition, with application to Indian states","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Carleton University; Shastri Indo-Canadian Institute","keywords":"Competition (biology); Legislature; Political science; Power (physics); Political economy; Economics; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.04015134022713287,"score_gpt":0.3423227522382233,"score_spread":0.30217141201109043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980233304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99350166,0.00060218613,0.00011720651,0.004160542,0.00014669119,0.00081459776,0.0000034958466,0.000044121123,0.0006094938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934435,0.000008588498,0.000029084911,0.000103233986,0.00013055082,0.0001093292,0.0000025886466,0.000007897892,0.000264384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985216,0.00013678071,0.00021791612,0.00015691313,0.00059367175,0.0003731004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988893,0.00013405076,0.00009750812,0.00013820826,0.00065099733,0.000089881636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006855419,0.00009463981,0.0001841259,0.000032089207,0.00045340246,0.000038033257,0.00013524458,0.0000294159,0.00001709334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111560475,0.000059410224,0.000029714538,0.0004059705,0.00015844607,0.00007372037,0.000018207613,0.000065136635,0.00008026409],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022335508,0.00010178122,0.8994508,0.00009519311,0.00026823598,5.907375e-7,0.0064585186,0.00021086638,0.0058087767,0.07804453,0.0060728686,0.003264525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013006326,0.0033624424,0.51378673,0.00040938717,0.00012306155,0.0000010441261,0.0058908747,0.000095858326,0.02165007,0.010321976,0.44197276,0.0010851411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014748945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18173037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4358999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002567279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109488705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99181193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049548963","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102200","title":"Do young voters vote for young leaders?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Turnout; Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; Voter turnout; General election; Focus (optics); Test (biology); Voting; Demographic economics; Political economy; Public relations; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.18947698312632155,"score_gpt":0.40887269750566474,"score_spread":0.2193957143793432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049548963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8288035,0.013332757,0.003277302,0.13466641,0.0041392595,0.0018888345,0.00003819524,0.00046664017,0.013387135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972232,0.00006535976,0.00020981142,0.0004237255,0.00082653225,0.000027144957,0.000002704426,0.000008585049,0.0012129087],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991174,0.000048397305,0.00011321868,0.00018689904,0.00020884974,0.0003252437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996458,0.000057244786,0.00004158289,0.000047726116,0.0001227231,0.00008489892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013932232,0.000079921905,0.00013423717,0.000018606243,0.0005572543,0.000060135393,0.00010448026,0.000036442012,0.000006876075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000288275,0.000070692826,0.00007254022,0.000145506,0.00019985813,0.00008970718,0.00002761165,0.00005713661,0.000012540229],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008654431,0.00006252894,0.340635,0.00016988278,0.00068620034,0.0000105608515,0.3988027,0.000063120046,0.0028683655,0.036342442,0.21516235,0.005110299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003470307,0.0010556892,0.09173027,0.00008240576,0.0004332527,0.0000036156578,0.518393,0.00065788714,0.006885012,0.025350848,0.34999165,0.0019460993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022739808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006829142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24890472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000680676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004738508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42860058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087277790","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102204","title":"Policy congruence and its impact on satisfaction with democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Congruence (geometry); Respondent; Democracy; Ideology; Politics; Political science; Elite; Public policy; Public administration; Political economy; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07337371087409572,"score_gpt":0.41872148458029723,"score_spread":0.3453477737062015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087277790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.977477,0.00044947743,0.0000060625484,0.021392832,0.00004154922,0.00019818767,0.000004041643,0.00006836032,0.0003624508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986502,0.000023552018,0.000008744675,0.0006602127,0.0005086933,0.000012343046,6.1345503e-7,0.000006984716,0.00012863886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904686,0.00012633823,0.00011077966,0.00016715468,0.00022452475,0.000324322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945074,0.0001429956,0.00005076111,0.000037240716,0.0001181538,0.000200082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010485386,0.000107733715,0.00017832142,0.000026497088,0.00047652298,0.00004656845,0.000040654017,0.00003569861,0.000023683571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005031901,0.00007256409,0.000024001147,0.00032038055,0.00011603319,0.00017040738,0.000012856817,0.0000908536,0.000038061142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001327769,0.000014932806,0.9477386,0.000031824078,0.00011277919,0.000004916283,0.0034401426,0.00003287131,0.00125326,0.04307981,0.0015830189,0.0025751023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036775836,0.0014736904,0.9932471,0.000053060165,0.000031627394,0.0000012344815,0.00027723904,0.000084331914,0.0007727198,0.0021520904,0.0012592445,0.00027988947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03801354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029208045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04550855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014962457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001119702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124921334","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2016.05.008","title":"Incumbency effects in U.S. presidential campaigns: Language patterns matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Presidential system; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.030348822389680542,"score_gpt":0.376936692103599,"score_spread":0.3465878697139184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124921334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958352,0.0009595647,0.000076553675,0.0018452199,0.00046573323,0.000298456,0.0000043299074,0.000057536978,0.00045744603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677527,0.00001035617,0.00000920967,0.00017468976,0.00053907203,0.00009233671,9.120361e-7,0.000010578494,0.0023875723],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841386,0.0003602978,0.00021909563,0.00020461576,0.00026469122,0.00053746515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993552,0.00032467232,0.000053511907,0.00010618875,0.00007437695,0.00008607352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031309796,0.00011557907,0.00021783807,0.00006003199,0.00014748752,0.00003349211,0.00012001185,0.000065850305,0.0003268411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045067156,0.00007662733,0.000044345612,0.00022321515,0.00011903875,0.00021633267,0.000041138617,0.00006619095,0.00036532732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008824124,0.000028688903,0.9890828,0.000040512503,0.000023585912,0.000014464661,0.0036644347,1.4949325e-7,0.0015944622,0.00215091,0.0022379388,0.0011532444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004888653,0.00010149614,0.9915723,0.00027085835,0.000018012539,5.274524e-7,0.00036477213,6.671788e-7,0.0019206827,0.003188109,0.0018186141,0.00025505686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04054893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23008506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18953612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023240945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044401506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96584016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125711898","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2007.07.005","title":"Estimating voter migration in Canada using generalized maximum entropy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of maximum entropy; Statistical physics; Econometrics; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.08628621678495313,"score_gpt":0.38771372300646467,"score_spread":0.30142750622151154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125711898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99713796,0.00047491252,0.0004940908,0.0010204485,0.0005874351,0.0001696819,0.0000011377305,0.000022299328,0.00009202549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980206,0.000001827799,0.0011671453,0.00015789087,0.0005331963,0.0000069856746,0.0000018186307,0.0000067559713,0.00010378797],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998556,0.00014109553,0.00030391553,0.00014292264,0.00030288685,0.00055313366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954414,0.00012932818,0.000077233155,0.000056029403,0.00010663004,0.000086632164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055773905,0.00009490268,0.00018992796,0.000044782584,0.00031867423,0.000027646662,0.00006126489,0.000037086153,0.00002738019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028892115,0.000086211876,0.00002555403,0.00030655917,0.000056639674,0.000117279764,0.000014547586,0.00008251261,0.000003748217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001833084,0.000011586736,0.9905215,0.000016502685,0.000025510868,0.0000133157555,0.0014488724,0.00057994976,0.0026291832,0.0027636643,0.00081744813,0.0011541394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025167742,0.00027060785,0.8908058,0.00046515284,0.00014156292,0.0000056403615,0.004423026,0.036714587,0.012472678,0.02407827,0.026017094,0.0020887996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09971569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023062904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005050196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6030869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127480265","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102291","title":"More ‘Europe’, less Democracy? European integration does not erode satisfaction with democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; European union; Balance (ability); Political science; Politics; European integration; Power (physics); Democratic deficit; Political economy; Development economics; Economics; International trade; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.07149197890581331,"score_gpt":0.36219448592552167,"score_spread":0.29070250701970834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127480265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820141,0.00040315758,0.00041420164,0.0146783525,0.0004770047,0.00021641991,0.0000078017465,0.00017662604,0.00161229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453306,0.00005630634,0.00022967711,0.00039519314,0.00071745587,0.000016603424,0.000012265194,0.000026066758,0.0040133568],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754524,0.00083075766,0.00030940244,0.00035065363,0.00046787906,0.00049607677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864095,0.00019632137,0.00013118838,0.00016941638,0.00072371296,0.00013842186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046503666,0.00019204327,0.00028007512,0.00004353257,0.0012369868,0.00015658702,0.00010036552,0.00005219722,0.00005551165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007140604,0.00012961327,0.000056249326,0.0005286903,0.00025734142,0.00038126003,0.000044986744,0.00020169292,0.0000761125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080648024,0.00008226992,0.9306698,0.00005452076,0.00020022749,0.00007539275,0.005235409,0.000030395493,0.0132337175,0.021599142,0.0031916394,0.025546836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052402815,0.00022978442,0.9647478,0.00020572683,0.0001410138,0.0000077061895,0.0033724788,0.000043077365,0.017879287,0.0022118872,0.010015496,0.00062171736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014938965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26766494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.252726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021077054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013911178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99162066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137312298","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102317","title":"Did you see it coming? Explaining the accuracy of voter expectations for district and (sub)national election outcomes in multi-party systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Sophistication; National election; Preference; Politics; Political science; Voting; Work (physics); Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.16225706378283633,"score_gpt":0.4382771896651659,"score_spread":0.27602012588232955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137312298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931527,0.0014683274,0.0004924617,0.003957193,0.0003331835,0.00046280542,0.000019869487,0.000023007202,0.000090464535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990654,0.000017283955,0.00004930744,0.000060430957,0.00013821694,0.00025353805,0.0000120860195,0.0000066136467,0.0003971075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986672,0.0002582896,0.00035129098,0.00017455361,0.00026935284,0.00027934284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787617,0.0014629094,0.00014068387,0.000062389154,0.00041663786,0.000041232175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040197308,0.000099483375,0.00025896693,0.00004606107,0.0005774088,0.000062176325,0.00006093273,0.000051322382,0.0000038171142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002692371,0.000072818766,0.000049952076,0.000323039,0.0001164932,0.00016867739,0.000024310571,0.00008210424,0.0000015780827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055828452,0.00031260579,0.92659634,0.0001608858,0.00030765313,0.0000021915148,0.035814565,0.00024748387,0.004113767,0.028189395,0.0033979095,0.00080137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003356058,0.00047279516,0.9028548,0.0003276382,0.00017606757,0.000004855973,0.06519008,0.005079558,0.0047334577,0.0031777727,0.013785544,0.0008414055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006218813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07964262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07342381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017489764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009610816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94010264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159479758","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102334","title":"Is compulsory voting habit-forming? Regression discontinuity evidence from Brazil","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Turnout; Regression discontinuity design; Political science; Scope (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Group voting ticket; Voting behavior; Single-member district; Ranked voting system; Economics; Law; Computer science; Politics; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1457805920220383,"score_gpt":0.4420809344766271,"score_spread":0.2963003424545888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159479758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97648895,0.012807503,0.000076676515,0.0091920635,0.0006588888,0.0001443255,0.000008112515,0.00010323872,0.0005202638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943155,0.0000586623,0.00019185057,0.0004725805,0.00095869583,0.000017788941,0.0000047979215,0.000010801077,0.003969344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978398,0.0004365436,0.0003290969,0.00035362516,0.00048814205,0.0005528035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851567,0.00068562484,0.00013635245,0.00015967338,0.00035594412,0.00014672734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047892024,0.00015919418,0.00035387176,0.0000240579,0.001006422,0.00011975527,0.00015386129,0.00008867856,0.00022669163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00185303,0.00012975643,0.00011056096,0.00035483434,0.00024778442,0.00037498906,0.000118745425,0.00017876885,0.00008575697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016738031,0.00004565572,0.961794,0.00003662753,0.0000898903,0.000016034568,0.008914267,0.0000015687746,0.0033438245,0.0023143447,0.016661275,0.006765745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007246562,0.00023794486,0.8819166,0.0032888742,0.00021348886,0.0000024330416,0.003657756,0.00040975638,0.038679242,0.014225683,0.055354103,0.001289498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027715752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1041344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079877466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024635615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015727783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97875875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161542587","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102340","title":"Electoral incentives and elite racial identification: Why Brazilian politicians change their race","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Race (biology); Extant taxon; Political science; Incentive; Competition (biology); Political economy; Politics; Identification (biology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Position (finance); Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Geography; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.11076053706119604,"score_gpt":0.39925209315916976,"score_spread":0.2884915560979737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161542587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556585,0.023358108,0.00004893049,0.018606607,0.0009009106,0.000476724,0.00003380081,0.00017407212,0.0007423543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950891,0.00027324745,0.000030963398,0.0009997969,0.0018926688,0.000100548765,0.000016231106,0.000017925493,0.0015795165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752975,0.00057254126,0.00035816783,0.00040461213,0.00035959232,0.0007753603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987575,0.00023511876,0.00011986781,0.00016957916,0.0005045701,0.00021341168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047130493,0.00020606632,0.0003717475,0.00006261483,0.0011317934,0.00021183601,0.00012922517,0.000110887864,0.00009479449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061565684,0.00018938366,0.00008784865,0.00058662816,0.00047637802,0.0004659985,0.00007491613,0.00016529154,0.000041038158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007677122,0.00034798554,0.73553836,0.0002340126,0.0005527238,0.000042617572,0.052021187,7.4832974e-7,0.014958165,0.1550234,0.014971603,0.026232438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007436647,0.00019504577,0.5103018,0.00026318964,0.0001407174,0.0000065265385,0.005162133,0.000030407526,0.012105466,0.014055682,0.4559912,0.0010041329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008868342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18440454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44101962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023603009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000143041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169641487","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102347","title":"The political phenotype of the disgust sensitive: Correlates of a new abbreviated measure of disgust sensitivity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Disgust; Politics; Social psychology; Ideology; Psychology; Ingroups and outgroups; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Anger","score_opus":0.11612222603043902,"score_gpt":0.3166177601585866,"score_spread":0.20049553412814758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169641487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886781,0.0016002811,0.000020079633,0.008743747,0.0004580975,0.00012577874,0.00003433095,0.000012790918,0.00032681457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991716,0.000074276504,0.000016133103,0.00026942723,0.000052706357,0.0000014765866,9.0052106e-7,0.0000065389577,0.00040694562],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984834,0.00038331785,0.0002847478,0.0002209124,0.00035340196,0.0002742113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849784,0.00079667545,0.00016454136,0.00022283584,0.0002713444,0.000046763205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020170902,0.00013039095,0.00033021014,0.000014796034,0.00019200204,0.0000050963563,0.00012534072,0.00004483388,0.000008064275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017101754,0.000070437774,0.00014517904,0.00036124297,0.00083454483,0.00003537264,0.000176529,0.0001683243,0.000004176961],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003590325,0.00045416004,0.10039913,0.00010094789,0.00032114118,0.000034484456,0.00051734806,0.000050042545,0.8526902,0.03578193,0.0064354716,0.0028560767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035433742,0.00011424265,0.410956,0.00013295606,0.00006998499,0.000027747983,0.00034256245,0.000032613763,0.5853595,0.0023415233,0.0001671302,0.00010137941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018298769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004465396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31055686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035957637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009420337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3074915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193750065","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102381","title":"Permissive electoral systems and descriptive representation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Permissive; Representation (politics); Descriptive statistics; Descriptive research; Proportional representation; Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science; Statistics; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15183174827763457,"score_gpt":0.41221113423180095,"score_spread":0.2603793859541664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193750065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680688,0.023535073,0.0000737888,0.0021217954,0.0009725464,0.0002535786,0.0000052517116,0.00007307999,0.0048961104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922775,0.0004620661,0.00007713884,0.000052170504,0.00038078017,0.000023593395,0.0000063794464,0.000007257315,0.006713116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879825,0.0002702439,0.00013985875,0.00024405631,0.0002648375,0.00028274307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991647,0.00010617882,0.00005999891,0.00008223718,0.0005033918,0.00008347506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015743794,0.00008724469,0.00016947469,0.000035460045,0.0006263817,0.00014282897,0.0000475472,0.000046463505,0.000018457915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050545234,0.0000804822,0.00003640618,0.0002528549,0.00019730482,0.00017026182,0.000045744884,0.00007514292,0.000008218995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045944817,0.0001603415,0.6900964,0.00014100855,0.0009476145,0.00019293018,0.13320085,0.000081757935,0.014930689,0.118298,0.03655612,0.005348339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001947893,0.00033919903,0.3780831,0.0001820707,0.00036208145,0.000062654755,0.48910674,0.00043099438,0.021369506,0.021564772,0.08515885,0.0013921191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007526097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006063853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3559059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014054858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014825264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214080342","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102421","title":"Communicating safety precautions can help maintain in-person voter turnout during a pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"COVID-19 and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Turnout; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Priming (agriculture); Distancing; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Medicine; Computer science; Politics; Disease","score_opus":0.1355020953358742,"score_gpt":0.4357874996500697,"score_spread":0.3002854043141955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214080342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802594,0.014318398,0.00001292778,0.004024593,0.0003155009,0.00021292547,0.000018744424,0.00007971114,0.0007577856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970885,0.00032463443,0.000093469454,0.00067283347,0.00010152672,0.00007880135,0.000013404388,0.000016262351,0.0016105655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985671,0.00029465588,0.00026225005,0.0002877112,0.00010274066,0.0004855303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926096,0.00022954504,0.00006613344,0.0003318981,0.000046310568,0.00006512899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024338141,0.00014684313,0.00028136882,0.00006226802,0.0003745807,0.00001135788,0.00012985649,0.000059885955,0.00014160378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008973904,0.00014120238,0.00006296934,0.00030491428,0.00007455926,0.00003430929,0.00014109528,0.00036488124,0.0000307613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001650297,0.00018748596,0.9670436,0.00013521471,0.00018537934,0.00008112734,0.020827023,0.0000066109014,0.00231189,0.0008078162,0.00048591703,0.007762944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013576284,0.00013439362,0.9788863,0.00021151778,0.000025889514,0.00005082393,0.013382885,0.000009413337,0.00048127506,0.00022229124,0.004982698,0.00025485657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060283807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116994664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11096628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011478445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014207095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9113149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216868771","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102418","title":"Does the monetary cost of abstaining increase turnout? Causal evidence from Peru","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voter turnout; Voting; Demographic economics; Leverage (statistics); Political science; Sanctions; Economics; Poverty; Development economics; Economic growth; Politics","score_opus":0.11122757822158394,"score_gpt":0.3986503718752009,"score_spread":0.287422793653617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216868771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816275,0.011351367,0.000015475705,0.0061052265,0.00043015418,0.00018558658,0.000015432875,0.000034371926,0.00023486851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819595,0.00014315266,0.000042458305,0.00017321162,0.00066383166,0.000033826855,0.000004184997,0.000006697487,0.00073667284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982307,0.00054730015,0.00027243298,0.00019661234,0.0003903994,0.0003625785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979523,0.0013346581,0.000101026984,0.00016223582,0.0003587671,0.00009101654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052540365,0.00010665348,0.00025953067,0.000015801594,0.0005493945,0.000049870545,0.00014469458,0.000051351697,0.00015804375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023569434,0.00005674014,0.00007118593,0.00028707483,0.000356498,0.00017029006,0.00006780137,0.00013083761,0.000018497782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048482954,0.0000561465,0.9678095,0.00004231339,0.00025385988,0.000024053856,0.017186854,0.000030125682,0.0050646095,0.0032534886,0.0035157714,0.0027147667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047957565,0.00021203757,0.9305139,0.00078345044,0.000311921,0.0000012524041,0.014737292,0.00014529914,0.017291998,0.009467477,0.02543414,0.0006216118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1682068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20729545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03908865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011951401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001896433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8373322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319212943","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102577","title":"Policy signals and strategic voting for minor parties: Evidence from Germany","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Minor (academic); Disapproval voting; Straight-ticket voting; Foregrounding; Scholarship; First-past-the-post voting; Political economy; Public administration; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.28819640815703534,"score_gpt":0.46385281159385255,"score_spread":0.1756564034368172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319212943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99058104,0.0028026863,0.000012045797,0.005811698,0.0001733301,0.00033510686,0.000015059468,0.00014637533,0.00012268411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971142,0.0000720241,0.000028181063,0.00011873126,0.0012510937,0.00013200357,0.0000031390127,0.000009609981,0.0012710368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986081,0.00016277695,0.00022824356,0.00022496743,0.00021641709,0.0005594825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983455,0.0012555447,0.000074234296,0.00006274519,0.0001453714,0.00011659422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056228024,0.00011163983,0.00023227882,0.000057309946,0.0006915405,0.000097012715,0.00008719239,0.000057565187,0.0000164002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012168952,0.00009604654,0.000049085796,0.00041489644,0.00019812044,0.00017459759,0.000035492518,0.00005640106,0.00004392166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001348427,0.000071642855,0.7099851,0.00044271135,0.0005584039,0.000011688759,0.036399256,0.000069484915,0.027886054,0.20241122,0.017522512,0.0045071375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019019456,0.0019281205,0.46013564,0.001949063,0.00045762616,0.0000012275298,0.018013213,0.003997335,0.009740682,0.47761616,0.02159985,0.0026591392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038691934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043663807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27520496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009548573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011064241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97378683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319454202","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102593","title":"Vaccine or catalyst? Christian religion and populism in Europe: A rejoinder to Inglehart's “Religion's sudden decline”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Democracy; Voting; Attendance; Radical right; Political science; Political economy; Social psychology; Church attendance; Positive economics; Religious studies; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Economics; Religiosity; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.056721753692822625,"score_gpt":0.3753082884613946,"score_spread":0.31858653476857196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319454202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826538,0.0026101484,0.000002869416,0.013098958,0.0005776097,0.0004951519,0.0000073788383,0.00030047787,0.0002536081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916396,0.0020733357,0.00012767213,0.0016056796,0.0004569458,0.000070807095,0.0000178167,0.0000374643,0.00397069],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975899,0.00020021145,0.0004097445,0.0005299146,0.00053758366,0.00073267584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991054,0.00016774534,0.00010642865,0.00021821653,0.00020991774,0.0001922842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008785212,0.0002416801,0.0004304651,0.00033718333,0.00075447926,0.000108081396,0.0003054213,0.00009022004,0.00001341998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020891507,0.00019322889,0.000040012354,0.0027105103,0.0000880681,0.00021396721,0.00042877626,0.00018900674,0.00018119892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027856213,0.00010561072,0.35587007,0.00006529718,0.00016250495,0.0004033631,0.026835693,0.000015627571,0.000754656,0.0012356566,0.61106926,0.0032037008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002011633,0.00048928807,0.47276273,0.0003963631,0.00008025674,0.0000050836593,0.0029445295,0.000020036461,0.00046558087,0.003774137,0.5160083,0.0010420124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039154164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2690375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22988333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022305975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012606446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9672442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322102733","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102599","title":"Spatial voting in non-partisan cities: A case study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ballot; Ideology; Voting; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Public administration; Voting behavior; Political economy; Public relations; Politics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.12826275838980708,"score_gpt":0.4363183695699442,"score_spread":0.30805561118013713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322102733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978597,0.00012865756,0.000007360558,0.00061560405,0.00041674465,0.0005353745,0.0000019977197,0.00015881703,0.00027574348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837756,0.0000021792011,0.0000042105985,0.000039608385,0.0005585989,0.00015730438,0.0000012123328,0.000011702714,0.0008476303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810153,0.00034516922,0.00032323867,0.00023376598,0.00032147195,0.0006748023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934703,0.00030996563,0.000059294598,0.000085456326,0.00009878194,0.00009948052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000954758,0.00012375672,0.0002771327,0.0001222902,0.0006478785,0.000060097787,0.00008789703,0.00004959914,0.000034425346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005644023,0.00011341968,0.000043888653,0.0009593692,0.00013371122,0.0001329298,0.00005657054,0.00013056106,0.000118870674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007149935,0.00006930384,0.9712693,0.00001682588,0.000037681377,0.00071435247,0.024752716,0.00001800095,0.000041760468,0.00047999775,0.0013250113,0.0012678863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018124885,0.0012615395,0.858748,0.00017473863,0.000083042,0.000026516167,0.13026305,0.0013707355,0.00020922227,0.0012008061,0.0038767997,0.00097306736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3867625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84955126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46278876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021322483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006304549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6173211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383213518","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102642","title":"Electoral outcomes and satisfaction with democracy: A comparison of regional and national elections","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); National election; Political economy; Quality (philosophy); Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.1602063671754859,"score_gpt":0.45094419003783204,"score_spread":0.2907378228623462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383213518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99416536,0.0005941208,0.00001699083,0.0047418233,0.00008248255,0.0001883851,0.000004762017,0.00009585267,0.00011019681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992404,0.000029311412,0.00007459806,0.00005441137,0.00011707786,0.000033695575,0.000004466627,0.0000081286835,0.0004379127],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987222,0.00013272582,0.00022751275,0.0001807521,0.0004322833,0.00030454976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990853,0.00038522057,0.00010284199,0.00004221109,0.00030022356,0.000084204454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003088152,0.000109797926,0.00027958964,0.000113239934,0.0007001026,0.000033464876,0.00003360987,0.000055084714,0.000010120852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029826612,0.00008725736,0.000026909194,0.00055952097,0.00036233797,0.00016977593,0.000020091642,0.00009842693,0.000005958834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021111704,0.000016653972,0.979959,0.000019859419,0.000091029775,3.209148e-7,0.00091146183,0.0000074083355,0.00033286074,0.014963644,0.0029973832,0.0006792711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022418569,0.000196084,0.9929585,0.000023379045,0.000028360286,0.0000011174458,0.00035708107,0.00008457864,0.00010942033,0.0044708946,0.0014263912,0.00012001744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016331658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17542067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15908903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001063696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010504785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385224253","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102649","title":"The effects of personal campaign financing on party defection: Evidence from Brazil","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Personalism; Autonomy; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political science; Business; Public relations; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.09168779933786238,"score_gpt":0.40389006826580653,"score_spread":0.31220226892794417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385224253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99220353,0.0043241004,0.000008187514,0.0020961508,0.0009355579,0.00022515826,0.00000238209,0.000091158356,0.00011378563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980227,0.0001760047,0.000003179841,0.00006879532,0.0005835373,0.00006863535,9.4439605e-7,0.0000063981493,0.001069833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984675,0.00038142837,0.00018380188,0.0001693994,0.00039790416,0.0003999417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952542,0.004379711,0.00008196901,0.00009227517,0.00013208266,0.000059722635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061590126,0.00009523163,0.00018708363,0.00002601935,0.0011529565,0.00003760822,0.00010640928,0.00004846739,0.000011737034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036351974,0.000063146,0.00007899483,0.0005048446,0.00025492348,0.00009764108,0.000028236554,0.00010467765,0.000095510506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014033308,0.000066770976,0.8634024,0.00021022868,0.00031438813,0.000013533647,0.026258009,0.000027132688,0.0073684477,0.012600052,0.07876831,0.010830395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037047808,0.0010161162,0.9540281,0.0011114911,0.000095071395,2.3324326e-7,0.0015784126,0.00011331153,0.011997273,0.0080547575,0.02125062,0.00038407656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019131925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049460303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090625755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014455813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074803094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98739976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385657738","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102648","title":"The education and income voting divides in Canada and their consequences for redistributive politics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Université du Québec à Montréal; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Political Science Association","keywords":"Voting; Cleavage (geology); Elite; Redistribution (election); Political science; Redistribution of income and wealth; Politics; Democracy; Political economy; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Unemployment","score_opus":0.06755846940226314,"score_gpt":0.37905700633397027,"score_spread":0.31149853693170715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385657738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897221,0.00259336,0.0000020837572,0.0071595493,0.00022552564,0.00022025684,0.000018745943,0.000016033839,0.00004239015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943095,0.00006281455,0.0000037821676,0.00005631308,0.00016286044,0.00007967517,0.000002822227,0.0000028537586,0.00019790951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992304,0.00011431855,0.00013928564,0.00009933802,0.000086960295,0.00032974215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845797,0.001309147,0.00004226048,0.000028435106,0.000107604305,0.000054604527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004491452,0.00006072819,0.00011344117,0.000017972825,0.0008517292,0.00004714335,0.000043545693,0.000019192787,4.0478997e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012528158,0.00003949208,0.000009327625,0.0002023182,0.00030376582,0.000055350716,0.000023937815,0.00004437643,3.1173292e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031576412,0.000003129283,0.9189271,0.00002492542,0.000018877774,2.55391e-7,0.0020198377,7.5531835e-7,0.000036728212,0.074802026,0.0012529212,0.0029103095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014082032,0.00007202835,0.908096,0.0001020866,0.000011353499,5.813703e-7,0.017689599,0.00010902854,0.00031653832,0.060406696,0.012874866,0.00018040478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95135695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045936342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003261049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006759464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65508986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386553764","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102677","title":"Revisiting Clarke and Stewart’s (1995) investigation of PM approval and vote intentions in the UK","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Popularity; Politics; Voting; Political science; Prime (order theory); Positive economics; Economics; Econometrics; Law","score_opus":0.14164000429347665,"score_gpt":0.393517641980011,"score_spread":0.2518776376865344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386553764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99308497,0.001163924,0.0000040741397,0.005240234,0.00006191937,0.00019419497,0.0000018464466,0.000019982741,0.00022887337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954,0.00005085944,0.000021912776,0.000065779255,0.00014922036,0.000021790265,0.0000017478801,0.0000029826183,0.00014571752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897504,0.00030600454,0.00019359705,0.00011033104,0.00020628568,0.00020871879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945825,0.00032040285,0.00005969241,0.00004696705,0.00007993722,0.000034759873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001215408,0.00005752168,0.00013761492,0.000053135696,0.0002835622,0.000033602435,0.0000467278,0.00003463105,0.0000017515376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006643316,0.000041436895,0.000018481414,0.0004898777,0.0002962705,0.0000828515,0.000028903423,0.00008091908,0.000002699143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000387652,0.0000034950438,0.9679233,0.000061216415,0.000018090725,9.3073584e-7,0.0076508415,0.0000012236842,0.00096674473,0.02157551,0.0007628862,0.0010318774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013984629,0.00006507682,0.9853602,0.00011981232,0.000021339953,5.2409996e-7,0.0038042217,0.00007200385,0.00013288736,0.009165418,0.0010279787,0.00009071436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007970301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038060103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030089801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030006875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026455591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386996164","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102676","title":"Weaponizing post-election court challenges: Assessing losers’ motivations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Negotiation; Legitimacy; Democracy; Politics; Government (linguistics); Petitioner; General election; Kenya; Vulnerability (computing); Public administration; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Supreme court; Computer security","score_opus":0.17648507481869863,"score_gpt":0.3995127728387146,"score_spread":0.22302769802001599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386996164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85182416,0.027945926,0.00008598014,0.073455915,0.0025119185,0.0004974453,0.000009794591,0.0014173895,0.04225146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436647,0.0039209225,0.000043523087,0.00018510036,0.00081786345,0.00004744478,0.000005430032,0.000009143855,0.00060409267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859613,0.00012229498,0.00017354349,0.00024250764,0.0004144093,0.00045109008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990393,0.0002976313,0.00009332882,0.0000662008,0.00044825728,0.000055285982],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049442117,0.00013081454,0.00021081808,0.00012836444,0.0031690444,0.00007493415,0.000115005896,0.00005864992,0.000024178073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013133024,0.000121137746,0.000074361145,0.00094546523,0.00044438962,0.0003445201,0.00007714164,0.00013205402,0.00018011594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060514056,0.00032150807,0.17394733,0.000109184875,0.0019625383,0.00007967616,0.08110879,0.00012406781,0.0050586825,0.57268184,0.06235721,0.10218867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047256672,0.00017251728,0.618009,0.0002444916,0.00012242032,0.000002898931,0.11634357,0.0000345844,0.0003528691,0.036777575,0.22665964,0.00080790505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041592093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023987047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5359042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000268434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001739154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387807484","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102711","title":"Populism in Canada: Something old, something new","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Psychological nativism; Political science; Political economy; Distrust; Authoritarianism; Politics; Parliament; Public opinion; Public administration; Democracy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.11969209563415334,"score_gpt":0.3881934807500114,"score_spread":0.2685013851158581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387807484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858539,0.0026471808,0.0000041277003,0.008487184,0.0018988183,0.00023471702,0.000003895424,0.00023067882,0.0006394903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98820204,0.00028351526,0.00022804424,0.0011186996,0.0006022459,0.000020445945,0.0000043940195,0.00002475869,0.009515844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972821,0.00023241946,0.00033524577,0.00035453102,0.00084000634,0.0009557271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918175,0.00032793684,0.00010492128,0.00015430315,0.0000680382,0.00016303793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011137594,0.00018606184,0.00037109878,0.00022632699,0.0009934617,0.00006838905,0.00038262934,0.00007002332,0.000045955137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013022387,0.00017542808,0.00005542974,0.001670081,0.00009238557,0.0003188935,0.00017613656,0.0003267072,0.00006562593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017691204,0.00003422684,0.71943617,0.0000482531,0.00028357268,0.00024104665,0.07384584,0.00016229432,0.00053576025,0.0077806856,0.17765431,0.019960137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017296948,0.000084501546,0.6739995,0.00039758816,0.000069524685,0.0000010065578,0.035501346,0.00009545764,0.0010416266,0.057751264,0.22776733,0.0015611367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99412704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99897367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05011302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023511807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016748181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7641005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388508519","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102712","title":"Are women election averse?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Representation (politics); Politics; Political science; Competition (biology); General election; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Public relations; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.1259231947246369,"score_gpt":0.40893434335726786,"score_spread":0.283011148632631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388508519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993017,0.00023667545,0.0000037338532,0.0023981144,0.00063065276,0.00009445277,0.000001644382,0.00019631858,0.0034213718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98514897,0.0001525076,0.000005311784,0.000106567924,0.00036901617,0.00003161658,0.0000016544027,0.0000048329134,0.01417954],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921805,0.00006593434,0.00006824991,0.000111824185,0.00019749648,0.00033843133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997232,0.000044769247,0.000047959882,0.000046073787,0.00009089198,0.000047117588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002345419,0.00004859985,0.0000843125,0.000060455106,0.0006053557,0.000029139683,0.00005105061,0.00002798416,0.000053680236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022651903,0.00004334665,0.000025705784,0.0004767304,0.000088771885,0.00006087681,0.00002475513,0.00004617044,0.00022559025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022129729,0.00006543484,0.5109661,0.000052488755,0.0003924304,0.000031767875,0.116903596,0.0000744328,0.0011354353,0.015064394,0.34836063,0.0069311373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003122461,0.0000745369,0.4805515,0.00001362832,0.000016554077,5.401772e-7,0.12894328,0.000033831286,0.0008059643,0.024977965,0.36398384,0.0002861151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014981496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006091736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030414617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019944205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030901483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46559682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389497203","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102717","title":"Still sacrificial lambs? Yes! Minority groups in Canadian federal elections, 2015–2021","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Diversity (politics); Indigenous; Politics; Racial diversity; Minority group; Intersectionality; Race (biology); Demographic economics; Public administration; Ethnic group; Gender studies; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06964776523357982,"score_gpt":0.3861933462238704,"score_spread":0.3165455809902906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389497203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844239,0.0012039803,0.0000017176891,0.007022938,0.0013521796,0.00023090398,0.000013423138,0.00007192865,0.005679073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939449,0.00025329905,0.000013779233,0.00009289304,0.00084907125,0.00002932034,0.00001410341,0.000006939321,0.004795732],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984476,0.00015894622,0.00016418047,0.00021942022,0.00025774207,0.00075212313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995323,0.00007078735,0.000032046064,0.00007639679,0.00012239881,0.00016609042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004314935,0.000098965706,0.00015943762,0.00021184416,0.00071457756,0.00008284524,0.000104834304,0.000075410644,0.000060657654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003065765,0.00009916112,0.000048767924,0.0008572093,0.00013082555,0.00010485061,0.000028699547,0.00014130352,0.00012814818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009767617,0.000037008143,0.8783258,0.000014507043,0.000074324,0.000041132316,0.017914008,0.000023655932,0.00010075542,0.014038977,0.08768938,0.0017306403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003032163,0.00007938407,0.8099468,0.000013388077,0.000017843418,0.0000010048543,0.016154982,0.00008624372,0.00010711366,0.010057108,0.16288066,0.00035229704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90849626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99597853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08748225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005511293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046476375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5496025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391908148","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102747","title":"Limited supply: Youth underrepresentation in the Canadian House of Commons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"House of Commons; Political science; Commons; House of Representatives; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.19554379320768903,"score_gpt":0.41159499599386035,"score_spread":0.21605120278617132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391908148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97282785,0.0042286576,0.000005678486,0.015011789,0.0004556055,0.0002912434,0.000018743553,0.000053265496,0.00710714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994913,0.000090777125,0.00000769126,0.00008599464,0.00009929544,0.000010514503,0.0000062512618,0.000005726638,0.00020245086],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919,0.00018151723,0.000111532725,0.000097008815,0.00021272335,0.00020722384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965453,0.0001630292,0.000017785387,0.000072222654,0.000056581128,0.00003585239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033766427,0.000048546914,0.0000794383,0.00011305381,0.00030011055,0.00007147359,0.0001063605,0.000031478558,0.000008671679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111487265,0.00003426925,0.000032661148,0.00045852945,0.00017961026,0.000064788816,0.000012102464,0.00008603225,0.000007373885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000463034,0.00004162298,0.42805177,0.000039660852,0.00013340202,0.000020422776,0.47923023,0.00007636736,0.000052398325,0.07808521,0.012834066,0.0014302178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029159553,0.00008978374,0.6102147,0.000091411224,0.00010341538,0.0000014224446,0.34992123,0.00017013653,0.00037611855,0.02504893,0.013427201,0.00026402503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81242704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18216296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001563818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024288123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23082381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399375810","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102812","title":"The (non)-religious voter in Canadian elections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Université de Sherbrooke","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.027896605884601924,"score_gpt":0.40495723527882366,"score_spread":0.37706062939422175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399375810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39558348,0.1012818,0.000038735794,0.37896034,0.012670975,0.0009934249,0.000012898821,0.0006008674,0.10985747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831236,0.0049975794,0.0000065326362,0.0005053218,0.00031361546,0.00005354842,6.207117e-7,0.000006886162,0.010992298],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990884,0.00006873994,0.00012013144,0.00013057956,0.00014034036,0.00045182405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951744,0.00023193704,0.000010901545,0.00006958043,0.00007217508,0.00009799269],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003244366,0.00007017345,0.00008181527,0.00007287516,0.0014433505,0.00021840559,0.000115554656,0.00004830772,0.000024322766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019953621,0.000049699847,0.00008106259,0.0006443221,0.00018587886,0.00008917545,0.0000121618095,0.00022572001,0.00020713019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023606028,0.00000920178,0.015673533,0.0000048335223,0.00013114438,0.000017835218,0.02503192,0.000010511853,0.00003030831,0.015851345,0.9397859,0.0034511082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025762223,0.000014689386,0.0022840656,0.000020671894,0.00000681384,0.0000010659932,0.0038513418,0.00005731557,0.000011754935,0.002899022,0.9907528,0.000074708405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8097212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5875401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008026079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053106266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400535817","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102829","title":"Are young candidates “sacrificial lambs”? Evidence from the 2012, 2017, and 2022 French legislative elections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"NOMINATE; Legislature; Politics; Political science; Young adult; Demographic economics; Political economy; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Developmental psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.11853289438935842,"score_gpt":0.40151504074355693,"score_spread":0.2829821463541985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400535817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72624475,0.24585204,0.000102416045,0.019912014,0.0030290454,0.00042019773,0.00008469543,0.00015390138,0.004200922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98691905,0.0026481072,0.000019329524,0.00006888041,0.0011139994,0.00003501231,0.000003473251,0.0000065043023,0.009185663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989279,0.00018342085,0.00011668554,0.00024351277,0.0002581725,0.00027029816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991218,0.00057956454,0.00005094188,0.000083243285,0.000118877135,0.000045562167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027086277,0.00009805309,0.00012377476,0.00003137283,0.0012912377,0.00022913699,0.00010892778,0.000042570515,0.000077315955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041328894,0.000065416054,0.000042062486,0.00026821782,0.0003404553,0.00022502427,0.000056830977,0.00017011241,0.000028914144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010439518,0.000023613102,0.40250382,0.000018791503,0.0004880399,0.000021693964,0.10106359,0.000004337476,0.0006188681,0.005567132,0.48799118,0.0016885069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015863296,0.00012444054,0.76719534,0.00030065657,0.00027660505,0.000004555804,0.03789758,0.00023372825,0.0004940504,0.034138113,0.15868497,0.00049134664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10421481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41745183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3646915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097071854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010198109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400615015","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102824","title":"The unswayed voter: How a polarized electorate responds to economic growth","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.050918301208703214,"score_gpt":0.38811330509232017,"score_spread":0.33719500388361695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400615015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83735704,0.01729204,0.000036768597,0.13806064,0.004109034,0.0005904539,0.000029524801,0.00041132656,0.0021131418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98537844,0.00073810207,0.000049623977,0.00082270824,0.0014346074,0.000069363734,0.0000015428527,0.000018000892,0.011487584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983993,0.00024780605,0.00017164141,0.00025276464,0.00024945603,0.0006790441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875236,0.00078261533,0.00003438768,0.00015322953,0.000118828226,0.0001585558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008905995,0.00015454857,0.0002089351,0.0000883602,0.0011091882,0.0005355817,0.00033198725,0.00006438728,0.000030890827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009151886,0.0001052883,0.00008738445,0.0004357235,0.00030749093,0.00021201807,0.0000680803,0.00018991248,0.00042555528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028364718,0.000028499222,0.027132975,0.00009220213,0.001102029,0.000077067634,0.052783225,0.0000034035952,0.008469266,0.4668621,0.43453068,0.008634903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001241714,0.00016892084,0.0018067451,0.0000439528,0.00003994142,9.964205e-7,0.0014222994,0.000018591321,0.0013147553,0.009286465,0.98550206,0.00027107974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031085603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027642002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5509714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004134723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046404678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400853363","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102834","title":"The Political Representation of Young Adults: Explaining youth's underrepresentation in parties, candidacies and parliaments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Politics; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.10780426411152189,"score_gpt":0.4067444805972224,"score_spread":0.2989402164857005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400853363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865784,0.008637793,0.000025229296,0.0022408736,0.00047912204,0.00022806428,0.0000067178976,0.00003626926,0.0017675208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986636,0.0008519815,0.000021233245,0.000019440204,0.00013020872,0.000032515312,0.0000058424657,0.0000062785284,0.0002689196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873424,0.00019324513,0.00024740217,0.00018946858,0.00030391398,0.0003317468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936444,0.00038570573,0.000044841807,0.000074348456,0.00008182421,0.00004884553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030122558,0.00007743491,0.00012946068,0.00006869122,0.00038535375,0.00011985757,0.000064392196,0.000035540234,0.0000030577576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037850282,0.00005685786,0.000032113538,0.00029769,0.00041863695,0.0001786778,0.000044907174,0.00008140822,0.0000013246362],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004265651,0.000024271874,0.6367714,0.000073589705,0.00014085296,0.0000066110974,0.16340408,0.000016065926,0.00009425102,0.19418715,0.00045237446,0.00478674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039234315,0.00007458162,0.101975024,0.00020609621,0.000052910134,0.000001663439,0.8606667,0.000505064,0.001294164,0.034185965,0.00046687174,0.00017863318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034283567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042080678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6972626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013097985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007788271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97539884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401841929","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102848","title":"Cultural sources of gender gaps: Confucian meritocracy reduces gender inequalities in political participation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Meritocracy; Politics; Inequality; Political science; Gender studies; Gender equality; Gender gap; Sociology; Demographic economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.22049479704679165,"score_gpt":0.4358736646470374,"score_spread":0.21537886760024577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401841929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530652,0.0303532,0.0000038397534,0.0022107838,0.00051591045,0.00021250392,0.000010348082,0.00010927887,0.0135189295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732846,0.0007924268,0.000082411636,0.00014973205,0.00047077818,0.00008199947,0.000005767754,0.000009275379,0.001079146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982311,0.00017518841,0.00044156954,0.00028498433,0.000299159,0.0005680019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993787,0.00023834938,0.00006628662,0.000063412444,0.00017721072,0.00007603432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044855766,0.00017734362,0.00038431643,0.00011207283,0.00039835053,0.00010033955,0.0001145497,0.00006944933,0.0000819702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040648543,0.00013932846,0.000087276436,0.00035605888,0.000609315,0.00034451587,0.0000668548,0.00012554819,0.000021055088],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037735546,0.00011810298,0.35141286,0.00031882932,0.0007781168,0.000018472896,0.33786196,0.000006824799,0.00027457983,0.29151663,0.015951546,0.0017043345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005627634,0.00014351752,0.30333203,0.0003010945,0.0001553962,0.0000026039725,0.5367212,0.00001837442,0.0051958906,0.035245247,0.11734121,0.0009806561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026656515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010782209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2562714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021529102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000150855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6016726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402754400","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102865","title":"Speech targeting and constituency representation in open-list electoral systems","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Public administration; Computer science; Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.14618689165382065,"score_gpt":0.46908396288966947,"score_spread":0.3228970712358488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402754400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95948726,0.031596728,0.000022766366,0.002866269,0.0014934104,0.0008216546,0.000006684705,0.00016201257,0.003543196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975418,0.00008366274,0.00004764783,0.00004118343,0.0005850504,0.000092837305,0.000005515296,0.000012081411,0.001590214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981367,0.00038037144,0.0003651409,0.0003509654,0.00027647833,0.000490357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993103,0.00032987204,0.00005138702,0.000080093014,0.0001270592,0.000101271915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009766419,0.00013522376,0.00030150576,0.00009826748,0.00042112436,0.0005638935,0.00014089093,0.00007590541,0.000035166893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006793981,0.0001195588,0.000029480536,0.0007062767,0.00026169413,0.00053018844,0.00007714326,0.00016851192,0.000030526608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028005412,0.000051922336,0.76704466,0.00025074117,0.00010895955,0.000086677406,0.0035400186,0.000018572904,0.0029517596,0.2051375,0.018148495,0.0026326776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038210435,0.0015911248,0.23637624,0.0052491627,0.00045635746,0.000064566346,0.018071791,0.0064259702,0.005178772,0.05739316,0.6606313,0.0047405316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16840145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123130575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64248276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031022343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014724418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402906264","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102864","title":"Does a voter's decision to sit out an election depend upon where others stand?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.06706123675440784,"score_gpt":0.4269489897016348,"score_spread":0.35988775294722697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402906264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98446023,0.004039911,0.0010579259,0.0066411714,0.0024340544,0.0004935342,0.000011093115,0.00038769675,0.00047438632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949249,0.000047753718,0.00012387328,0.0001206427,0.0012521498,0.0000625678,0.0000017898217,0.00002349334,0.0034428295],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803215,0.00024568473,0.0002689626,0.00038949747,0.00047580473,0.00058787764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918884,0.00023226812,0.000034127803,0.00013436565,0.0001730098,0.00023738648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062002725,0.00017275353,0.0002470112,0.00010378989,0.000613728,0.00029698273,0.000132711,0.000100494486,0.00014261439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002876122,0.000108730615,0.00007708401,0.00046328962,0.00006005074,0.0003963745,0.000030434194,0.00014570095,0.00023381523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010524952,0.0005827355,0.20660868,0.0008234251,0.0014486157,0.00014637496,0.12264643,0.0003469482,0.03712362,0.078851156,0.16068836,0.38968116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040704853,0.0017034158,0.012660292,0.00081559684,0.00015156854,0.0000018328037,0.0029216798,0.00038696232,0.0052350117,0.0283872,0.94627136,0.0010580501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018701632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61401933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78558296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053109333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011775715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9878329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411117874","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102953","title":"Wrong place or wrong party? LGBTQ2S+ candidates and district competitiveness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University; Canadian Political Science Association; Princeton University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.05570237901484839,"score_gpt":0.3940373885629436,"score_spread":0.33833500954809526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411117874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768032,0.008440335,0.00008283329,0.0051535666,0.0005018722,0.00027906246,0.000011969164,0.00007292749,0.008654237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98679656,0.0006070879,0.00002853683,0.00010004539,0.0001068035,0.000020780037,0.00000429913,0.000003677984,0.012332241],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991855,0.00011229943,0.000113158574,0.00017503389,0.0001437622,0.00027026163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995134,0.00025388776,0.00003532433,0.000059525137,0.00009064647,0.000047246045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016875738,0.00008706139,0.00015991398,0.00004250629,0.00076239737,0.000072684496,0.0000757044,0.00003408799,0.00003529434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018439337,0.00006517521,0.000023467226,0.00024363385,0.00029615022,0.00008046576,0.000064417756,0.000059731396,0.0000046199384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056711036,0.00005352922,0.9329853,0.00009604189,0.00026908002,0.000011791136,0.008846472,0.000013817128,0.0001078197,0.044111907,0.008949766,0.004497756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093832763,0.00011988842,0.7089891,0.00014060042,0.00012856914,0.0000013045743,0.03440652,0.00007859217,0.0014868702,0.0040293974,0.2492533,0.00042753565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064883907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0383329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24030353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010494138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012708864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9808549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416881421","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2025.103019","title":"The rural-urban cleavage in US presidential elections: Stability and sudden change","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cleavage (geology); Democracy; Presidential system; Voting; Presidential election; Survey data collection; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.08981040668505379,"score_gpt":0.40015228464884994,"score_spread":0.31034187796379614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416881421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98128575,0.010284262,0.000003188897,0.006381051,0.00039719092,0.00052873575,0.000001928026,0.000052311287,0.0010655915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980801,0.0002145543,0.000003029423,0.00011825906,0.0003336839,0.00019074768,6.617605e-7,0.000003947931,0.0010550189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855644,0.00042459046,0.00023346131,0.0001588925,0.00018157272,0.00044506902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927723,0.0004313394,0.000043513122,0.00009864776,0.00009898939,0.00005025631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074312126,0.000094072595,0.00017362181,0.000045590925,0.0010893595,0.000109469125,0.00010039843,0.00005834397,0.000011965786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055049156,0.0000689363,0.000033764747,0.0004710266,0.00036955345,0.00017831002,0.00005317906,0.00013029415,0.0000057301445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025924483,0.00002445037,0.97485244,0.000021730719,0.00003536883,6.0591174e-7,0.0021120775,6.53116e-8,0.00019929119,0.016827881,0.004371124,0.001529027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021391755,0.00007408695,0.9608229,0.000055387125,0.000023433493,1.2719941e-7,0.0012782182,0.000007825897,0.00093665166,0.007897027,0.028557489,0.00013297654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094067834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5891823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49511448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022214236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067735244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91196483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W750601527","doi":"10.1016/j.electstud.2015.06.004","title":"Refining vote choice in an ethno-regionalist context: Three-dimensional ideological voting in Catalonia and Quebec","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electoral Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Voting; Dimension (graph theory); Political science; Salient; Context (archaeology); Politics; Voting behavior; Political economy; Democracy; Sociology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.22587839774607427,"score_gpt":0.4305851226910416,"score_spread":0.20470672494496733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W750601527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99376535,0.0024993748,0.0000031376817,0.0034168544,0.00013937369,0.00012209953,0.0000019093206,0.000040135787,0.000011777799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910414,4.4139906e-8,0.00004723022,0.00028048104,0.0002555881,0.00003082581,0.0000060839657,0.0000069046696,0.0002687245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825245,0.00036964586,0.00030739175,0.00027322336,0.00030900168,0.0004882902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911696,0.00041600634,0.00007319938,0.000063658765,0.00015672263,0.00017346336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001051396,0.0001293352,0.00029965368,0.00006524887,0.00023818789,0.00004933925,0.000092079856,0.00010606441,0.000004314669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00128729,0.000109294124,0.000022173586,0.00031257077,0.00038450875,0.00028391858,0.000057789453,0.00021088638,0.000007374727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022489883,0.000033772147,0.99617594,0.000007181022,0.000007362233,0.000009655234,0.00022456002,0.000022728243,0.000049740604,0.002260927,0.00024356996,0.0009420641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039358105,0.00011750266,0.99669087,0.00006450068,0.0000050650992,8.4137895e-7,0.000031571497,0.00019084358,0.000012786506,0.00024175558,0.0020902513,0.00016043198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.963297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99985003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03655303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035995967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012947846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4456885},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"}]}