{"meta":{"query_hash":"1909cf09aa69","filters":{"venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1909cf09aa69","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Electronic+Government+an+International+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1976080207","doi":"10.1504/eg.2009.022594","title":"Identifying critical factors for adoption of e-government","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"E-Government; Government (linguistics); Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information and Communications Technology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027871532742610342,"score_gpt":0.3568325668714122,"score_spread":0.32896103412880184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976080207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99059194,0.00014150018,0.0009206359,0.00045461376,0.000004785447,0.00007899185,0.000058183923,0.0000137452735,0.0077355197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994481,0.000058740225,0.00034617705,0.000012721322,0.000002544854,0.000009507571,0.00002382329,0.0000017771841,0.00009649049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975585,0.0008355532,0.00026539495,0.00016833546,0.00056779216,0.00060436316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95242023,0.027929738,0.009985323,0.001469491,0.0054236683,0.002771621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029391507,0.0003445855,0.00025172526,0.0019420099,0.00091282366,0.0022809783,0.00032247187,0.0007770038,0.0046489937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0251116,0.00027857674,0.0004594811,0.0019828593,0.0013938295,0.0017029698,0.0009338145,0.0014164081,0.00032218147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121871235,0.00035919406,0.9690263,0.000120669145,0.00006536836,0.00032237815,0.0044409274,0.000542647,0.0008825431,0.005898346,0.00031844463,0.017901223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000118283615,0.00016761248,0.97533584,0.000112013084,0.00007608217,0.00026186078,0.01508183,0.0029377085,0.001098265,0.0031920306,0.0016961251,0.000028758534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062155817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069066994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062155817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001323693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029357753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015552402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038427192","doi":"10.1504/eg.2006.008495","title":"How to compare and analyse risks of internet voting versus other modes of voting","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Polling; Computer science; Electronic voting; Computer security; Transparency (behavior); Risk analysis (engineering); Vulnerability (computing); Group voting ticket; Internet privacy; Secrecy; The Internet; Bullet voting; Cardinal voting systems; Actuarial science; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.029115041657756472,"score_gpt":0.2942502200955216,"score_spread":0.26513517843776513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038427192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6388992,0.00074895774,0.33085054,0.0012665484,0.00009991733,0.0006178009,0.00047646667,0.00017796991,0.026862616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676107,0.00023636287,0.030756062,0.0000692535,0.000026589276,0.0001705116,0.0001262067,0.000031846084,0.00097235455],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892229,0.006489288,0.000567671,0.00052512996,0.0026254624,0.0005695928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92027324,0.06543652,0.0073273303,0.0027160475,0.0036717786,0.0005750306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016178627,0.000651723,0.0007343902,0.0048672142,0.00059755996,0.0033614808,0.0008221388,0.0013309942,0.0030645763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07302432,0.00026664487,0.0011433015,0.0018255248,0.0018942468,0.006884035,0.0014376143,0.001309214,0.00040504578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009909265,0.00045325494,0.1693867,0.00059724925,0.00092174386,0.0005025342,0.0031715452,0.31917858,0.004198028,0.29718748,0.0023200058,0.20109189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008107107,0.0013314395,0.06876638,0.00026221524,0.00024795328,0.0009806218,0.0061683385,0.5366439,0.0067164656,0.37164992,0.0069074207,0.00024421042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014950446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010189998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016178627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012055557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001153687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08556175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045831903","doi":"10.1504/eg.2010.030923","title":"Internal factors affecting the adoption and use of government websites","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Government (linguistics); Knowledge management; Process management; Computer science","score_opus":0.013677652153028535,"score_gpt":0.279276438994975,"score_spread":0.2655987868419465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045831903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99256927,0.00016918565,0.00047566497,0.00039100798,0.00000523474,0.00004558271,0.000039818126,0.000019284376,0.006284907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990301,0.00012296859,0.00041166387,0.000047749196,0.0000032890155,0.000014750876,0.00004038078,0.000007800851,0.000321217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923602,0.0031510093,0.00075910724,0.00043873105,0.0022999607,0.0009910563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93346286,0.037169803,0.012116804,0.0026499387,0.010881806,0.0037187778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00680033,0.0002496073,0.000305762,0.0017804082,0.0013133016,0.0042162803,0.00051304366,0.00085352705,0.0019009274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04669827,0.00035601173,0.0004276667,0.0022593634,0.0021278863,0.0014328354,0.0014795151,0.0014902012,0.0003129844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000839752,0.00030894537,0.92990756,0.00015960181,0.000077565775,0.0003552543,0.035098087,0.00031116034,0.00096520985,0.0012295434,0.000491059,0.031011978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072883154,0.00012137339,0.94007534,0.00015169577,0.00006149321,0.0002346816,0.054894246,0.0007412027,0.0004965358,0.00055354997,0.0026249667,0.00003759363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034461085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04072097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034461085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028375213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042741117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06852096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056430051","doi":"10.1504/eg.2008.016635","title":"Prioritising areas for the development and delivery of government e-content and e-services: an appraisal of the Alberta SuperNet","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Government (linguistics); Business; Value (mathematics); Service (business); E-Government; Goods and services; Value for money; Service delivery framework; Public service; Marketing; Public economics; Economics; Public administration; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.027112194182629817,"score_gpt":0.27540330318628015,"score_spread":0.24829110900365034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056430051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5637498,0.064148135,0.012739036,0.06182925,0.00064393255,0.001238105,0.0022022075,0.00047463292,0.29297495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8963863,0.0361041,0.023084788,0.002396477,0.000116441784,0.0001642238,0.0009975483,0.00008194085,0.04066809],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961079,0.0008574362,0.00012713818,0.0001272243,0.0023522158,0.0004280483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99066985,0.0019081158,0.0003293175,0.00015892513,0.0058106403,0.0011231722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065614674,0.0006874085,0.0004437833,0.0039058086,0.0031591782,0.0045489697,0.0019220748,0.00078649895,0.005497509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006970701,0.00026841296,0.0004082501,0.00520919,0.0019697777,0.0015662936,0.0019185789,0.00084025547,0.00039072713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015447619,0.00033486943,0.059804577,0.0036516457,0.000100783545,0.0009884152,0.0041867443,0.023460448,0.004735,0.0983128,0.04150286,0.761377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044053953,0.0016850741,0.38769093,0.0032591086,0.00050400564,0.0006104474,0.054645408,0.040239707,0.008977506,0.021743786,0.47988036,0.00032307988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8996473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9464517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100352705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05318864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10297546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38591236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066253814","doi":"10.1504/eg.2004.005551","title":"Issues and challenges in e-governance planning","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Information and Communications Technology; E-governance; Project governance; The Internet; Business; Government (linguistics); Action plan; Information governance; Public relations; Internet governance; Knowledge management; Political science; Public administration; Information system; Economics; Management; Management information systems; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.03506182461586105,"score_gpt":0.3273109351558158,"score_spread":0.2922491105399547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066253814","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027215878,0.024496248,0.07600222,0.618992,0.0013105051,0.0008630926,0.00018974849,0.00020613767,0.25072417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8175885,0.026412409,0.10046612,0.016483044,0.0010172243,0.0011610421,0.000338996,0.000118686665,0.036413945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785905,0.012681974,0.0014132351,0.0015101624,0.0030778414,0.0027263172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97461444,0.015662797,0.0012990558,0.00118877,0.004379486,0.0028553724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026600063,0.0005120092,0.00092507416,0.0031569835,0.009478951,0.02504073,0.00462115,0.009774073,0.009968429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031989317,0.0008221435,0.0008673473,0.008168756,0.014940186,0.022757959,0.008888066,0.008675969,0.0015333103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009113448,0.00006690238,0.0010104262,0.00038984627,0.000016576645,0.00042060178,0.0032540648,0.0081667295,0.0000744731,0.91382575,0.014364558,0.058400873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012447703,0.000020827776,0.00059556426,0.00085296255,0.0000068434456,0.00015551937,0.022844484,0.004860602,0.00014447323,0.86335176,0.107123815,0.000030797288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020866103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022321168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026600063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014711324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036067147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14067626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107308752","doi":"10.1504/eg.2009.024441","title":"Multi-agent based framework for e-government","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Architecture; Christian ministry; Service (business); Process management; Computer science; Point (geometry); Service-oriented architecture; Business; Service delivery framework; Knowledge management; Web service; World Wide Web; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.021886599735293645,"score_gpt":0.33969424162105166,"score_spread":0.317807641885758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107308752","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001960467,0.0018438852,0.94784343,0.0023412053,0.00035800613,0.0003112616,0.00012610885,0.0012553632,0.04396019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12539187,0.0021226262,0.83929497,0.0005945441,0.00019723325,0.0009693109,0.00033323624,0.00015534108,0.030940855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989594,0.00044065763,0.0000819989,0.00012643584,0.0003046115,0.00008685798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962914,0.0001229656,0.00003397863,0.00006663271,0.00007745114,0.000069837806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015346148,0.000709779,0.00068962836,0.00088597205,0.0015068738,0.0032225684,0.0025180073,0.002709581,0.007465729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014199582,0.00042651084,0.001166118,0.0008913785,0.0013489428,0.0027505974,0.0023587772,0.0022023146,0.0019429409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000198725,0.00004885598,0.0001701875,0.00014455272,0.000045807312,0.0003020801,0.00025033625,0.03213664,0.0010331351,0.9315641,0.0064759073,0.027808564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072870585,0.000060190254,0.00017471977,0.00019759448,0.00006118519,0.00035987564,0.00022337816,0.29467395,0.0011689616,0.39396232,0.30899513,0.000049859664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068400674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008315798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007465729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017985754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023453706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0249753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116429257","doi":"10.1504/eg.2014.063313","title":"New digital media use and preferences for government: a survey of Canadians","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital media; Government (linguistics); The Internet; Service (business); Public relations; Internet privacy; Business; Digital government; New media; Public service; E-Government; Advertising; Marketing; Political science; Computer science; Digital transformation; Information and Communications Technology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.023245132678580638,"score_gpt":0.27194165378031687,"score_spread":0.24869652110173623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116429257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99046624,0.00035589427,0.000055597477,0.0008712478,0.000008420013,0.000050177812,0.0018400542,0.0000055179576,0.0063469005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964311,0.0006238968,0.00012780937,0.00032891834,0.0000046293526,0.000021026344,0.00079588185,0.00000626478,0.0016604245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858284,0.0001439998,0.00008286455,0.0001118095,0.0006859804,0.00039251053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954602,0.000423392,0.000946281,0.0001348757,0.0018610682,0.0011741556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014102195,0.00022716203,0.00035421763,0.0019138166,0.0043400982,0.0020385105,0.00071214593,0.0006914934,0.003885724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004765167,0.00034855923,0.00047559626,0.005712715,0.0012195668,0.0008316146,0.0010590022,0.0009576917,0.0005842758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007275433,0.000107480046,0.9565713,0.00009639834,0.0000235826,0.00019330399,0.027467811,0.00008172083,0.000260917,0.00040870663,0.0033799352,0.011336112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006061313,0.00005881046,0.9419196,0.000068831636,0.000009872525,0.00011446832,0.05102021,0.00017158822,0.00005238723,0.000048240025,0.0064938264,0.000036180623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99083894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013911559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013911559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019576984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10093588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142220328","doi":"10.1504/eg.2014.063316","title":"E-government portals best practices: a comprehensive survey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Best practice; Government (linguistics); Business; Public relations; E-Government; Internet privacy; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Information and Communications Technology","score_opus":0.050856690538378546,"score_gpt":0.3599311228085629,"score_spread":0.30907443227018433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142220328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861838,0.0020350302,0.0009678422,0.0015481104,0.000015323529,0.0002094607,0.0019510139,0.000057783316,0.0070316796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902317,0.0032528753,0.002855527,0.00045132852,0.000012479907,0.0002516563,0.0017512704,0.000039395523,0.0011537956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992334,0.0022932289,0.00173408,0.00052535796,0.0025350174,0.00057825184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631199,0.015480826,0.0107410895,0.0017328319,0.006705896,0.0022194448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009367591,0.00016429414,0.00057587767,0.005565582,0.00093616237,0.0028541323,0.00063334726,0.0007932841,0.0020616513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03251158,0.0004624466,0.0004913025,0.009990023,0.00072723906,0.005557275,0.0022526563,0.00096433534,0.00070004264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085240834,0.00048057953,0.82327724,0.0015009169,0.00014423988,0.000340455,0.043767683,0.0001902235,0.00045915207,0.0015878194,0.008460717,0.11970575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001331461,0.00028877778,0.79872596,0.0017301801,0.00009269765,0.00084951095,0.14748688,0.00084367214,0.00045635086,0.00063885783,0.048815902,0.000058004392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026202693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003614711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009367591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014538262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023922964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049541116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755438189","doi":"10.18190/1980-8208/estudosgeologicos.v27np1135-158","title":"RESOLVING THE AERO ELECTROMAGNETIC (AEM) AND AEROMAGNETIC SIGNATURE OF THE BRUNSWICK NO 12 SULPHIDE DEPOSIT FROM ADJACENT FORMATIONAL ANOMALIES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Magnetic anomaly; Classification of discontinuities; Geophysics; Basalt; Discontinuity (linguistics); Magnetic survey; Signature (topology); Geochemistry; Seismology; Mineralogy; Geometry","score_opus":0.007021780712779662,"score_gpt":0.21503326799245703,"score_spread":0.20801148727967736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755438189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947627,0.000039081977,0.0027552708,0.00005755399,0.0000062241234,0.000012522326,0.0002864994,0.00012767839,0.0019525231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601126,0.000029439896,0.0032096794,0.000008112952,0.000001486433,0.0000038047567,0.0003263301,0.000013739703,0.00039613806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999373,0.000005741961,0.00000393562,0.000014610699,0.000017269515,0.000021171303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999155,0.000018207309,0.000014659845,0.0000115804905,0.000022747463,0.000017279022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000095075055,0.00034540694,0.00015580398,0.00064414897,0.00022166141,0.0006326905,0.0002753421,0.00035281983,0.00086559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040043503,0.0002714645,0.00024435532,0.00043529828,0.0002026066,0.00016273826,0.00034019267,0.00020919461,0.00016658986],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006135736,0.00023568426,0.42002794,0.00018249982,0.00018164795,0.0012658614,0.0007465777,0.27418435,0.20796235,0.0012041244,0.0010848686,0.09231057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077025026,0.000079756755,0.34897688,0.000022000126,0.000040863546,0.00020097615,0.0005915931,0.6364528,0.011229998,0.00042955985,0.0018529248,0.000045575445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21330109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41913092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21330109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010593075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017514685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42411906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2824780172","doi":"10.1504/eg.2018.10014478","title":"A practical framework for electronic citizens participation using a multidimensional analysis approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Process (computing); ICTS; Order (exchange); Information and Communications Technology; Focus (optics); Core (optical fiber); e-participation; Computer science; Public participation; Public relations; Knowledge management; Business; Process management; Political science; Computer security; Telecommunications; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0507110712007968,"score_gpt":0.41310173997428806,"score_spread":0.36239066877349124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2824780172","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008213037,0.0011466398,0.89886343,0.014779193,0.00022970139,0.0017604823,0.00018421047,0.00016814562,0.074655175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12955394,0.0006673301,0.8620906,0.00057033246,0.0000838685,0.0035784848,0.00015609547,0.000031834956,0.0032675986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.964143,0.029647369,0.001294891,0.0015711897,0.0024983503,0.00084523665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873762,0.007787693,0.0010389165,0.0010296493,0.0020142058,0.0007534609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034496684,0.0018011807,0.00096703065,0.0073571145,0.0063706087,0.012457858,0.0033503757,0.004120005,0.00532859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016174158,0.00069279585,0.0016902505,0.006352271,0.019874644,0.0106348265,0.009552787,0.0039553265,0.000970123],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008700473,0.00005037169,0.00034283698,0.00011982385,0.000007864728,0.00013876801,0.009629031,0.0008399859,0.00020666991,0.9775497,0.0009821663,0.01012409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048684986,0.000079663376,0.00071707304,0.0008150573,0.000019499352,0.00027387304,0.02193832,0.009147071,0.00037340625,0.8726912,0.09384589,0.000050252067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004251748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036267033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034496684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008166763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012687024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18243808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233179336","doi":"10.1504/eg.2018.093440","title":"A practical framework for electronic citizens participation using a multidimensional analysis approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Process (computing); ICTS; Information and Communications Technology; Order (exchange); Public relations; Core (optical fiber); Public participation; e-participation; Focus (optics); Computer science; Business; Knowledge management; Process management; Political science; Computer security; Telecommunications; World Wide Web; Politics","score_opus":0.0507110712007968,"score_gpt":0.41310173997428806,"score_spread":0.36239066877349124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233179336","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008213037,0.0011466398,0.89886343,0.014779193,0.00022970139,0.0017604823,0.00018421047,0.00016814562,0.074655175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12955394,0.0006673301,0.8620906,0.00057033246,0.0000838685,0.0035784848,0.00015609547,0.000031834956,0.0032675986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.964143,0.029647369,0.001294891,0.0015711897,0.0024983503,0.00084523665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873762,0.007787693,0.0010389165,0.0010296493,0.0020142058,0.0007534609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034496684,0.0018011807,0.00096703065,0.0073571145,0.0063706087,0.012457858,0.0033503757,0.004120005,0.00532859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016174158,0.00069279585,0.0016902505,0.006352271,0.019874644,0.0106348265,0.009552787,0.0039553265,0.000970123],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008700473,0.00005037169,0.00034283698,0.00011982385,0.000007864728,0.00013876801,0.009629031,0.0008399859,0.00020666991,0.9775497,0.0009821663,0.01012409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048684986,0.000079663376,0.00071707304,0.0008150573,0.000019499352,0.00027387304,0.02193832,0.009147071,0.00037340625,0.8726912,0.09384589,0.000050252067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004251748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036267033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034496684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008166763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012687024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18243808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}