{"meta":{"query_hash":"1909cf09aa69","filters":{"venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1909cf09aa69","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Electronic+Government+an+International+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1976080207","doi":"10.1504/eg.2009.022594","title":"Identifying critical factors for adoption of e-government","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"E-Government; Government (linguistics); Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information and Communications Technology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027871532742610342,"score_gpt":0.3568325668714122,"score_spread":0.32896103412880184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976080207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96594846,0.00017199708,0.00928956,0.008054809,0.0018601049,0.00027319582,0.0000797278,0.00003847193,0.014283696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966633,0.000345412,0.0006007876,0.00037463038,0.0011246863,0.000005603097,0.0000118674725,0.00001066943,0.00086309575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954367,0.00010371344,0.00040070887,0.00020491554,0.0033575678,0.0004963408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896926,0.00022807432,0.0003322912,0.00010991225,0.00018854179,0.00017190365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001126097,0.00014224299,0.00016024006,0.000034995355,0.00034561605,0.00032339751,0.0007558572,0.000087866654,0.0005546214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039889116,0.00013733156,0.00018024922,0.00008160426,0.00009395562,0.0012858907,0.00003282476,0.00022987096,0.0000037063548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003526556,0.00061827054,0.022852914,0.000008081686,0.0001932534,0.0000045494953,0.0059771985,0.000019294657,0.003915655,0.94806343,0.0011397473,0.016854923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006917986,0.006676367,0.23691536,0.00038390097,0.00042665706,0.00006212935,0.13087064,0.0014312853,0.023559712,0.19978437,0.3910725,0.0018990879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007212828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033147147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7482791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022320875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019726726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60727155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038427192","doi":"10.1504/eg.2006.008495","title":"How to compare and analyse risks of internet voting versus other modes of voting","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Polling; Computer science; Electronic voting; Computer security; Transparency (behavior); Risk analysis (engineering); Vulnerability (computing); Group voting ticket; Internet privacy; Secrecy; The Internet; Bullet voting; Cardinal voting systems; Actuarial science; Business; Political science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.029115041657756472,"score_gpt":0.2942502200955216,"score_spread":0.26513517843776513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038427192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6616236,0.00011660939,0.33721244,0.0005808409,0.00014684575,0.00004419829,0.0000044618587,0.000013118216,0.00025787813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355835,0.00001534795,0.005764552,0.00010837939,0.00034846776,0.0000016226891,0.0000017015867,0.000012478823,0.00018910965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763286,0.000086381886,0.00052372104,0.0002976171,0.0011142344,0.00034517873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988227,0.00010557133,0.0005998794,0.000113372495,0.00023716492,0.000121317855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063371664,0.00017696212,0.0002821991,0.00014180002,0.000055413868,0.0003038588,0.0011161224,0.00003265411,0.00004280806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011147862,0.00015998523,0.00015622191,0.00013674772,0.000035937053,0.00072813634,0.00023286905,0.0003093477,0.000002146126],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048161388,0.0004613089,0.029283818,0.0000171851,0.002039896,0.0000145820095,0.0050537023,0.06967979,0.0053330013,0.8125366,0.000509572,0.07458895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009884331,0.00038561213,0.0019362792,0.00009102741,0.000044324806,0.000038679253,0.00049997406,0.9871033,0.0076883757,0.000016699607,0.001015063,0.00019225235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049436847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065882294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9174235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048739134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006661553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6524008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045831903","doi":"10.1504/eg.2010.030923","title":"Internal factors affecting the adoption and use of government websites","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Government (linguistics); Knowledge management; Process management; Computer science","score_opus":0.013677652153028535,"score_gpt":0.279276438994975,"score_spread":0.2655987868419465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045831903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99170023,0.000042553318,0.00015390823,0.0018577987,0.0012506887,0.00012218428,0.000022520544,0.000016518336,0.0048335935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969567,0.000420012,0.00014949382,0.00019804643,0.00094399386,0.0000025931733,0.000003062167,0.000012738498,0.0013133577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635124,0.0001663588,0.00030316834,0.00018370512,0.0026307686,0.00036474786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987683,0.00038378968,0.00047302264,0.00013457217,0.000104605206,0.00013569227],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013033558,0.0001466523,0.00012487879,0.000025649184,0.00042169934,0.0006337637,0.00069208356,0.00008138936,0.00094705913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033390464,0.00010730911,0.00009720113,0.000076124124,0.00021504366,0.0014472886,0.0001265609,0.00063246966,0.0000036975969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001799359,0.00023385821,0.860286,0.000004251661,0.00033784017,0.0000051671323,0.009283584,0.000015958856,0.012046946,0.10407146,0.00071144017,0.012823532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013969317,0.0007137288,0.68056273,0.00008195106,0.00011559435,0.00009339518,0.045014374,0.00069528463,0.008925164,0.0025948954,0.259271,0.0005349221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001053987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00808842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25855955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071274943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001220657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056430051","doi":"10.1504/eg.2008.016635","title":"Prioritising areas for the development and delivery of government e-content and e-services: an appraisal of the Alberta SuperNet","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Government (linguistics); Business; Value (mathematics); Service (business); E-Government; Goods and services; Value for money; Service delivery framework; Public service; Marketing; Public economics; Economics; Public administration; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.027112194182629817,"score_gpt":0.27540330318628015,"score_spread":0.24829110900365034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056430051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99597776,0.00049955916,0.00010145903,0.0014080175,0.00040458914,0.00023769311,0.000024340112,0.000004218207,0.0013423553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975002,0.0010154108,0.0002703565,0.00020670211,0.00031793362,0.000011948678,0.0000031436396,0.000011086104,0.0006632666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969754,0.0001076569,0.00039042812,0.00018563092,0.0020407948,0.00030005074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988464,0.0003833313,0.00040475873,0.00013206305,0.00013028036,0.00010316622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008929147,0.00013324455,0.00015091593,0.000014140541,0.00054768386,0.000118688564,0.000749998,0.000056099867,0.00006675132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007275534,0.00008974431,0.000071842805,0.00005456896,0.0002455151,0.00064217456,0.00013912265,0.00016358188,2.4936625e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062520703,0.00051723776,0.8091542,0.000040851224,0.00082870194,0.000003015545,0.060413178,0.000024142748,0.002122998,0.096323304,0.00014125484,0.02980587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032610567,0.0007597201,0.77211326,0.00021669774,0.00015364971,0.00014300276,0.07208414,0.0013484843,0.0067902654,0.00083574007,0.1418249,0.00046906172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023456183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024457004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14168365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031881654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066253814","doi":"10.1504/eg.2004.005551","title":"Issues and challenges in e-governance planning","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Information and Communications Technology; E-governance; Project governance; The Internet; Business; Government (linguistics); Action plan; Information governance; Public relations; Internet governance; Knowledge management; Political science; Public administration; Information system; Economics; Management; Management information systems; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.03506182461586105,"score_gpt":0.3273109351558158,"score_spread":0.2922491105399547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066253814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90124106,0.011456363,0.00003161269,0.051328555,0.0006292173,0.00009699823,0.000004614477,0.00003082397,0.035180748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504279,0.04759171,0.00013687013,0.00033915637,0.0009881904,0.0000049793725,0.0000013677906,0.000010183321,0.00049963436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974097,0.000086071566,0.00021623111,0.0002086084,0.0016486447,0.0004307243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952507,0.000043963944,0.00018189114,0.00007765048,0.000050710063,0.00012073287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009620447,0.00011667563,0.000114351875,0.00003560359,0.0001947191,0.00029270758,0.00055087527,0.00006824676,0.00023275844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008164505,0.000116653944,0.000036689395,0.00006724178,0.000086893604,0.001246485,0.00006118855,0.00031758667,0.0000074144305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011580545,0.00020662232,0.057836547,0.000004718256,0.000088124674,0.00007513932,0.018417398,0.00014652971,0.000098673125,0.8924775,0.000091151065,0.030441806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035977156,0.00061038474,0.25112438,0.00027027228,0.000018522784,0.00011930252,0.038876243,0.00008015692,0.00038552133,0.07558726,0.62873405,0.0005961564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009832747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062463176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81689024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018158758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023024988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.475701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107308752","doi":"10.1504/eg.2009.024441","title":"Multi-agent based framework for e-government","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Architecture; Christian ministry; Service (business); Process management; Computer science; Point (geometry); Service-oriented architecture; Business; Service delivery framework; Knowledge management; Web service; World Wide Web; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.021886599735293645,"score_gpt":0.33969424162105166,"score_spread":0.317807641885758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107308752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43495223,0.0007945119,0.3918658,0.122185156,0.008935905,0.0019473011,0.00027509505,0.00034715782,0.03869686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757305,0.00032728052,0.013601522,0.0055180816,0.0025852658,0.000026735004,0.000013338605,0.000021622773,0.0021756904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442023,0.0001471938,0.0003964208,0.00032488036,0.00392629,0.00078497705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871826,0.00019926115,0.00040981124,0.0001957447,0.00017200114,0.00030491495],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015099444,0.00021755823,0.00017800265,0.000035149267,0.0005967581,0.0006467109,0.0012672151,0.00014361231,0.0013295725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032440826,0.0002120913,0.00022946073,0.00010815533,0.00007309764,0.0008450558,0.00003671272,0.0004270476,0.000020172205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009133314,0.0019918198,0.014440291,0.0000058918085,0.00041599438,0.00002736823,0.004178156,0.00025791512,0.0013544323,0.9042611,0.004646093,0.067507595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043752133,0.00196104,0.021568183,0.000113354574,0.000101133235,0.000017059569,0.008232506,0.006088711,0.001901367,0.04325552,0.9115293,0.0008566016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000061060884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004698953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90688324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004521619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046546484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116429257","doi":"10.1504/eg.2014.063313","title":"New digital media use and preferences for government: a survey of Canadians","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital media; Government (linguistics); The Internet; Service (business); Public relations; Internet privacy; Business; Digital government; New media; Public service; E-Government; Advertising; Marketing; Political science; Computer science; Digital transformation; Information and Communications Technology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.023245132678580638,"score_gpt":0.27194165378031687,"score_spread":0.24869652110173623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116429257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859652,0.00009707715,0.0018408614,0.0017025521,0.00073445623,0.00018104934,0.000544042,0.000015203501,0.008919592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970794,0.00030713205,0.00021471069,0.00020350705,0.00067838817,0.0000035340522,0.000034675562,0.000012420898,0.0014662613],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968948,0.00013219073,0.00029569585,0.00019645842,0.0020752759,0.00040562457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839854,0.0006818484,0.00033669255,0.00009681647,0.00017923946,0.00030688988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012237864,0.00012908285,0.00015914072,0.00002608884,0.00018479335,0.0007304705,0.00063233357,0.00006963437,0.00024513164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010423023,0.00012131568,0.000059552178,0.0000753337,0.000096187,0.001624776,0.000050886098,0.00015678933,0.0000016558149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004456327,0.00015460295,0.7262731,0.000005193671,0.0003948661,0.0000016464553,0.0063820994,0.00000868587,0.0000889347,0.16764086,0.0058923033,0.09271206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026389698,0.0010056674,0.7561819,0.000067341476,0.0000656482,0.000016052763,0.005042238,0.0004832921,0.00027655927,0.014962373,0.21872646,0.0005334944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026279228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24578103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2195018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000929728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056439225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9802049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142220328","doi":"10.1504/eg.2014.063316","title":"E-government portals best practices: a comprehensive survey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Best practice; Government (linguistics); Business; Public relations; E-Government; Internet privacy; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Information and Communications Technology","score_opus":0.050856690538378546,"score_gpt":0.3599311228085629,"score_spread":0.30907443227018433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142220328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8641707,0.00019702826,0.00054817565,0.0063756076,0.0022378454,0.00024788914,0.00006826588,0.00005643243,0.12609808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872624,0.0011600018,0.00014546768,0.0018429675,0.0024251097,0.000012919133,0.000029431227,0.000028927181,0.0070927436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914316,0.00091365917,0.00051049155,0.00038740507,0.0059695486,0.0007873111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969889,0.0005643467,0.0014437656,0.00025685487,0.0003820551,0.00036407413],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003501228,0.0002506628,0.0002448697,0.000038023052,0.00060555636,0.0009695739,0.0015110491,0.00012748032,0.0024535055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095209916,0.00024288148,0.00014355475,0.0001572759,0.00016187454,0.0018699553,0.0001433812,0.00057567045,0.00011953946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011877397,0.0022656524,0.6035557,0.000014863113,0.001754602,0.00007606395,0.008687111,0.000119774246,0.0015987694,0.31436566,0.013873853,0.052500192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012914767,0.00069400936,0.053398836,0.000038719827,0.00005606099,0.000049347134,0.009740594,0.000321555,0.0002464552,0.0017370452,0.93198246,0.00044343458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032773663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01880843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91810864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029064557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004809102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755438189","doi":"10.18190/1980-8208/estudosgeologicos.v27np1135-158","title":"RESOLVING THE AERO ELECTROMAGNETIC (AEM) AND AEROMAGNETIC SIGNATURE OF THE BRUNSWICK NO 12 SULPHIDE DEPOSIT FROM ADJACENT FORMATIONAL ANOMALIES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Magnetic anomaly; Classification of discontinuities; Geophysics; Basalt; Discontinuity (linguistics); Magnetic survey; Signature (topology); Geochemistry; Seismology; Mineralogy; Geometry","score_opus":0.007021780712779662,"score_gpt":0.21503326799245703,"score_spread":0.20801148727967736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755438189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99306405,0.0009474964,0.00010843839,0.00288255,0.0005264324,0.00013895308,0.000026423933,0.0000070273018,0.0022986138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997423,0.00040448416,0.00064839184,0.0003714649,0.000597487,0.0000013314032,0.00001065863,0.000004912643,0.00053824956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762136,0.00019446791,0.00032688893,0.00020891524,0.001240202,0.00040816082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880797,0.00027236855,0.00044121905,0.00026214423,0.00010724436,0.00010902859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003522104,0.00017167703,0.00016347434,0.000020465206,0.0007390739,0.00042241372,0.0012491123,0.000065849,0.0007487466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027618135,0.00009757122,0.00012067071,0.00004536029,0.00016473411,0.0004946232,0.00008397387,0.0006201472,0.000014172592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012973454,0.0003166072,0.6302299,0.000019181025,0.0006771986,0.000030982002,0.00076910807,0.0006428073,0.020680128,0.0065421327,0.0012972099,0.33749744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048408782,0.0007542473,0.9811284,0.000029527304,0.000041972544,0.000074426134,0.00003349683,0.0074918047,0.0015624465,0.00612924,0.0021408142,0.00012956931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014871854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024229337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3508985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053486143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014249342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81982505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2824780172","doi":"10.1504/eg.2018.10014478","title":"A practical framework for electronic citizens participation using a multidimensional analysis approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Process (computing); ICTS; Order (exchange); Information and Communications Technology; Focus (optics); Core (optical fiber); e-participation; Computer science; Public participation; Public relations; Knowledge management; Business; Process management; Political science; Computer security; Telecommunications; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0507110712007968,"score_gpt":0.41310173997428806,"score_spread":0.36239066877349124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2824780172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.592382,0.00004878003,0.39846945,0.004115287,0.0006988298,0.00031737465,0.000024902094,0.00004986787,0.0038934606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692812,0.00010954652,0.02571386,0.00074316165,0.0036068454,0.000032299464,0.00003123388,0.000022579,0.00045928822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953165,0.00029216104,0.0004223705,0.00038254735,0.0025910472,0.0009953802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982468,0.00033067283,0.0004919688,0.00017471005,0.000502364,0.00025349422],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020838198,0.00019242761,0.00022558382,0.00012703257,0.0008680539,0.00044886183,0.0005312472,0.00016454014,0.0012079929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005756029,0.00018816766,0.00027289015,0.00043323875,0.00021449252,0.0010663047,0.00006711636,0.00047162143,0.000012048573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055082067,0.0005367204,0.013670163,0.0000021041537,0.0019615034,0.0000030867377,0.0031213537,0.00019809305,0.00031394142,0.9779618,0.0003902379,0.0012901763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006509647,0.004058174,0.024693869,0.00010117018,0.0041619083,0.00015709843,0.027688883,0.47622502,0.0020723494,0.16653152,0.285526,0.002274371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025985975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014914605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8114303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003211102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010415838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233179336","doi":"10.1504/eg.2018.093440","title":"A practical framework for electronic citizens participation using a multidimensional analysis approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Government an International Journal","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Process (computing); ICTS; Information and Communications Technology; Order (exchange); Public relations; Core (optical fiber); Public participation; e-participation; Focus (optics); Computer science; Business; Knowledge management; Process management; Political science; Computer security; Telecommunications; World Wide Web; Politics","score_opus":0.0507110712007968,"score_gpt":0.41310173997428806,"score_spread":0.36239066877349124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233179336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.592382,0.00004878003,0.39846945,0.004115287,0.0006988298,0.00031737465,0.000024902094,0.00004986787,0.0038934606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692812,0.00010954652,0.02571386,0.00074316165,0.0036068454,0.000032299464,0.00003123388,0.000022579,0.00045928822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953165,0.00029216104,0.0004223705,0.00038254735,0.0025910472,0.0009953802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982468,0.00033067283,0.0004919688,0.00017471005,0.000502364,0.00025349422],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020838198,0.00019242761,0.00022558382,0.00012703257,0.0008680539,0.00044886183,0.0005312472,0.00016454014,0.0012079929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005756029,0.00018816766,0.00027289015,0.00043323875,0.00021449252,0.0010663047,0.00006711636,0.00047162143,0.000012048573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055082067,0.0005367204,0.013670163,0.0000021041537,0.0019615034,0.0000030867377,0.0031213537,0.00019809305,0.00031394142,0.9779618,0.0003902379,0.0012901763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006509647,0.004058174,0.024693869,0.00010117018,0.0041619083,0.00015709843,0.027688883,0.47622502,0.0020723494,0.16653152,0.285526,0.002274371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025985975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014914605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8114303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003211102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010415838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}