{"meta":{"query_hash":"fea00dff39b3","filters":{"venue":"Electronic supplement to Russian Juridical Journal"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/fea00dff39b3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Electronic+supplement+to+Russian+Juridical+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W4407753787","doi":"10.34076/22196838_2024_6_74","title":"ACTIVITIES OF THE LAW DRAFTING COMMISSION ON THE SYSTEMATIZATION AND INTEGRATION OF CHURCH LAW PROVISIONS INTO THE LEGISLATIVE SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE (first quarter of the XIX century)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic supplement to Russian Juridical Journal","topic":"Legal and Regulatory Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Commission; Quarter (Canadian coin); Legislature; Empire; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.007529176455893813,"score_gpt":0.26305666964367214,"score_spread":0.25552749318777834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407753787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16498151,0.042359386,0.027368851,0.098168164,0.015284852,0.005706705,0.0130882235,0.0017966041,0.63124573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44763133,0.013706284,0.049310695,0.017203897,0.002736867,0.0018864906,0.0056170365,0.00074075826,0.46116662],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938116,0.001428354,0.0007011876,0.0008769648,0.0020551423,0.0011266831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98885554,0.0043967427,0.0011661096,0.0012455862,0.0035119054,0.0008241967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014476587,0.0005413038,0.0007002478,0.0038110693,0.0058425884,0.0043445555,0.001162864,0.0042133206,0.008780163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016689578,0.0006401568,0.0007280851,0.0034428516,0.0020321743,0.0017881359,0.0022728767,0.0040679234,0.0018953544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002250242,0.00023311003,0.01166125,0.0012020483,0.00010624283,0.001028512,0.0141464975,0.0017874104,0.0082534095,0.38528335,0.45258746,0.12348572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004699208,0.00008910151,0.03526347,0.00044013147,0.00009402346,0.00016978284,0.001999929,0.0006351147,0.0051645394,0.009006198,0.9470112,0.00007957068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11301994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090686575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11301994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01008433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045170445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22472417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409081376","doi":"10.34076/22196838_2025_2_5","title":"CHINESE DOCTRINE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE ERA OF MAO ZEDONG AND DENG XIAOPING (1949–1992)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic supplement to Russian Juridical Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.005828661237539085,"score_gpt":0.3202453968438756,"score_spread":0.3144167356063365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409081376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20829135,0.05545679,0.0013125992,0.03739266,0.0018710674,0.00007012285,0.0004938301,0.000044334964,0.69506735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86696035,0.008832753,0.0005850028,0.0015474593,0.0005961858,0.000040744737,0.00014534312,0.00001198365,0.12128003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965,0.00006852935,0.000016237644,0.00006659973,0.00010997616,0.000088677145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99984276,0.000047406833,0.000029401624,0.000020211815,0.00003542946,0.000024723495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077077374,0.00032724158,0.00018006629,0.00096183625,0.003738525,0.0020569016,0.0003364341,0.0009619298,0.0027350632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013866626,0.00019034307,0.00016013379,0.0024669173,0.0035532974,0.0011481871,0.0009983882,0.0015079862,0.00029065064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043658893,0.000012504929,0.0023933738,0.00006975547,0.000013519259,0.00022502593,0.010113501,0.00029877725,0.0002853357,0.9286218,0.03650218,0.021420473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041939737,0.00006071303,0.068732664,0.00022214363,0.000050379982,0.0003221984,0.004193318,0.0013138982,0.0010588263,0.10779384,0.8161586,0.00005138657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08808398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15038233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08808398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00968671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004582022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17514253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}