{"meta":{"query_hash":"4da4d6539f14","filters":{"venue":"Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4da4d6539f14","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Emerald+Group+Publishing+Limited+eBooks"},"results":[{"id":"W2184367942","doi":"10.1108/s0733-558x(2013)0039ab020","title":"STRANGE BREW: BRIDGING LOGICS VIA INSTITUTIONAL BRICOLAGE AND THE RECONSTITUTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bricolage; Organizational identity; Problematization; Identity (music); Extant taxon; Sociology; Public relations; Business; Epistemology; Political science; Organizational commitment","score_opus":0.019179978765365487,"score_gpt":0.18523714223162863,"score_spread":0.16605716346626315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184367942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084776714,0.008599735,0.14831802,0.017780026,0.0007922945,0.00013577033,0.000044062414,0.0005812172,0.7389722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76021516,0.00448936,0.040534604,0.0016095063,0.000187659,0.00018008906,0.000096063806,0.00029752808,0.19239001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983133,0.0010096389,0.000041273284,0.00015581887,0.00034807881,0.00013188444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851817,0.000663836,0.00015063977,0.00038435933,0.00010407401,0.00017893128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001992576,0.00039923572,0.00028251365,0.0012314662,0.0038956145,0.009463498,0.0011363351,0.0015164483,0.005731007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033499396,0.0003126164,0.0003978382,0.0013224903,0.02023241,0.008200985,0.005626534,0.002399109,0.0013482255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001648371,0.00001579332,0.0003535288,0.00006816987,0.000003991144,0.00018200542,0.023094293,0.00044818097,0.00051385403,0.93363625,0.004500047,0.037167393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013623439,0.000047292335,0.0008080926,0.00026400512,0.00000897239,0.00042560181,0.018121175,0.0021880257,0.0016988198,0.5453146,0.43107665,0.0000331635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021645247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037707966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009463498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035989573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028607845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026112378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468183723","doi":"10.1108/s0733-558x(2013)0039ab017","title":"PUTTING NEW WINE IN OLD BOTTLES: UTILIZING RHETORICAL HISTORY TO OVERCOME STIGMA ASSOCIATED WITH A PREVIOUSLY DOMINANT LOGIC","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Stigma (botany); Key (lock); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Art; Computer security; Literature; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.053007225354975596,"score_gpt":0.2177720976188428,"score_spread":0.1647648722638672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468183723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12508015,0.007823326,0.10721563,0.027483443,0.0013357087,0.0001570237,0.00004692095,0.0003697711,0.730488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.934652,0.0024143003,0.023889014,0.0022377425,0.00036376851,0.000070031696,0.000051115927,0.0002516158,0.036070555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956377,0.0026714636,0.00009752262,0.00026307965,0.0011179292,0.00021227387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882493,0.00864844,0.0008163147,0.0010470493,0.0007934223,0.00044550738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008563316,0.0005641102,0.00026966422,0.002792149,0.0058173942,0.010625202,0.0013638677,0.0015839089,0.0035537314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013952147,0.0003185995,0.00027950283,0.0014775103,0.02250639,0.013608593,0.005095018,0.0030416152,0.0006595442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032496384,0.000034267352,0.0010671695,0.00021878078,0.0000091340535,0.00031325663,0.12693273,0.0002848309,0.0018957178,0.795281,0.0042176815,0.06971294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033479522,0.00011779567,0.0020660402,0.0010341448,0.00004407243,0.00067331025,0.0681846,0.0028294078,0.0051227845,0.37638518,0.54343575,0.000073450305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035941834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006670726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010625202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052515427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004168391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04528767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493986429","doi":"10.1108/s0733-558x(2013)0039ab009","title":"Processes for Retrenching Logics: The Alberta Oil Sands Case, 2008–2011","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Retrenchment; New institutionalism; Perspective (graphical); Resistance (ecology); Institutionalism; Work (physics); Action (physics); Process (computing); Political science; Production (economics); Epistemology; Business; Positive economics; Engineering; Economics; Computer science; Law; Public administration; Ecology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.030661156594919338,"score_gpt":0.20188661520124465,"score_spread":0.17122545860632532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493986429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9024753,0.0006631599,0.0016291483,0.009506568,0.000028226968,0.00009495463,0.00006653165,0.000036315145,0.08549983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99278826,0.00024249668,0.00087162165,0.00025839053,0.000004561014,0.00002187398,0.000040872914,0.000008280538,0.005763598],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997134,0.0007120086,0.00008914975,0.00020457475,0.00085275504,0.0010075325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958776,0.0016160725,0.0006049736,0.000438873,0.00064172025,0.00082074996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039414773,0.00022290614,0.00016763947,0.0017040905,0.014900385,0.005979778,0.0022440357,0.0026086594,0.0020224066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009698391,0.00030015298,0.00025096416,0.0027317943,0.015176601,0.002819057,0.004208326,0.0030193655,0.00016788198],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021731236,0.0002498978,0.097848795,0.000101666854,0.000016229289,0.014429292,0.46011093,0.004245982,0.0012956085,0.32082158,0.007374843,0.093287885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005073502,0.00006988238,0.09228267,0.00028576102,0.000028389479,0.0019195381,0.7250158,0.0045581637,0.0013713959,0.036219228,0.13810468,0.00009375333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.854788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92208606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.145212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07592106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04998053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5508484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}