{"meta":{"query_hash":"4da4d6539f14","filters":{"venue":"Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4da4d6539f14","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Emerald+Group+Publishing+Limited+eBooks"},"results":[{"id":"W2184367942","doi":"10.1108/s0733-558x(2013)0039ab020","title":"STRANGE BREW: BRIDGING LOGICS VIA INSTITUTIONAL BRICOLAGE AND THE RECONSTITUTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bricolage; Organizational identity; Problematization; Identity (music); Extant taxon; Sociology; Public relations; Business; Epistemology; Political science; Organizational commitment","score_opus":0.019179978765365487,"score_gpt":0.18523714223162863,"score_spread":0.16605716346626315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184367942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006951627,0.0010297665,0.01501776,0.0047586616,0.001023921,0.001208214,0.000044852364,0.00026207554,0.9759596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7065587,0.00058331224,0.0017766758,0.030337453,0.0111636305,0.00011269757,0.004638945,0.00034504302,0.24448356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975753,0.000019422065,0.00075130345,0.00051701337,0.0008445531,0.00029241742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787766,0.000120855504,0.0008638185,0.00029313331,0.0008187989,0.000025752592],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008225677,0.00045199197,0.0005086702,0.0005004935,0.0009099203,0.0024600846,0.00059891655,0.00028371817,0.001388428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004272164,0.0003722639,0.000148317,0.00022194233,0.00077230163,0.00474197,0.00086067297,0.0005160737,0.000093330746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029392551,0.000018857465,0.00053500914,0.00029688995,0.00022948743,0.00000502353,0.000057697158,0.000018738585,0.000016816999,0.96857494,0.027086692,0.003130465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029445824,0.000017157832,0.008527622,0.00055117474,0.00073819427,0.000017933913,0.000057969042,0.0021734356,0.000005523696,0.4632801,0.5205452,0.001141076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001051842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046082266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.731476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000798287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004534908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468183723","doi":"10.1108/s0733-558x(2013)0039ab017","title":"PUTTING NEW WINE IN OLD BOTTLES: UTILIZING RHETORICAL HISTORY TO OVERCOME STIGMA ASSOCIATED WITH A PREVIOUSLY DOMINANT LOGIC","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Stigma (botany); Key (lock); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Art; Computer security; Literature; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.053007225354975596,"score_gpt":0.2177720976188428,"score_spread":0.1647648722638672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468183723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057334085,0.0006418954,0.00021036928,0.02261897,0.002336805,0.0027979028,0.000015941781,0.0010615798,0.9645831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027738275,0.0000063954317,0.0013128064,0.027572284,0.024240652,0.00016437648,0.0006373325,0.0005923883,0.9177355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946042,0.000047494294,0.0013718114,0.0014482888,0.0011365362,0.0013917029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689597,0.00028897155,0.0013182971,0.0008758282,0.00040063015,0.00022028263],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012997865,0.0012063286,0.0013594168,0.0015670445,0.0002935363,0.0023988318,0.0012281934,0.0013439422,0.0012808925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012939734,0.0011061496,0.00032270481,0.00030922957,0.00011923297,0.004108696,0.00081568677,0.0029218178,0.00023651424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012389025,0.000116979325,0.0005908166,0.0002816802,0.00026465507,0.0004967133,0.0005805666,0.000045445533,0.00007966314,0.063613445,0.9254192,0.008386911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020366714,0.000107525004,0.0021976035,0.003851199,0.00026390742,0.000013986329,0.000047354624,0.0003468881,0.0000022956535,0.011049838,0.9785635,0.0015192184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0094771935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004511603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053144276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014081909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002267672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493986429","doi":"10.1108/s0733-558x(2013)0039ab009","title":"Processes for Retrenching Logics: The Alberta Oil Sands Case, 2008–2011","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Retrenchment; New institutionalism; Perspective (graphical); Resistance (ecology); Institutionalism; Work (physics); Action (physics); Process (computing); Political science; Production (economics); Epistemology; Business; Positive economics; Engineering; Economics; Computer science; Law; Public administration; Ecology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.030661156594919338,"score_gpt":0.20188661520124465,"score_spread":0.17122545860632532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493986429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006960541,0.0013497656,0.00027993828,0.01154423,0.001009581,0.0008307416,0.00003422627,0.00036376872,0.9845182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004932616,0.00014600476,0.0005229419,0.019693067,0.0075089457,0.00027081463,0.001301343,0.00027917913,0.9653451],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699867,0.000011846819,0.0008102703,0.0008995528,0.00058757025,0.00069208845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967276,0.0005081118,0.0010036146,0.0006332938,0.0010893332,0.000038045197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006720866,0.0008334594,0.00062322523,0.00055008463,0.0016518707,0.0063864402,0.0011359719,0.00044726147,0.002226736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010908083,0.00061441,0.00026356298,0.00017478014,0.00017218845,0.0033335122,0.0010031993,0.0007233027,0.00030039213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001809359,0.000017424716,0.00013772333,0.0009675088,0.0002996984,0.000026399848,0.0001518416,0.0000045488523,0.0000014032371,0.3911873,0.597261,0.009927031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047682572,0.000019202766,0.000076729586,0.0002836016,0.0004110109,0.000018472507,0.00008724091,0.00018094796,9.132319e-7,0.054730963,0.942902,0.00081208936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042177876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053379172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.345641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006835811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042651107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}