{"meta":{"query_hash":"1e7b6bfac91f","filters":{"venue":"Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1e7b6bfac91f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Empedocles+European+Journal+for+the+Philosophy+of+Communication"},"results":[{"id":"W2560298212","doi":"10.1386/ejpc.7.2.129_1","title":"Dewey/Lippmann Redux","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Dialogic; Epistemology; Historicity (philosophy); Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08556916203684305,"score_gpt":0.27723779481376604,"score_spread":0.19166863277692298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560298212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022907872,0.014707405,0.04653157,0.089618586,0.0040791356,0.00007920441,0.00013924332,0.00025858788,0.82167834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7169923,0.005269167,0.013827367,0.013572258,0.0014929562,0.00020994415,0.000072663686,0.00023810899,0.24832532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971167,0.0010075284,0.00013249705,0.0006897862,0.0008038886,0.00024961444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981396,0.0010568778,0.00017367996,0.00029476668,0.00023575147,0.00009923487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026785107,0.00053991383,0.00036134006,0.0011595136,0.003774854,0.0039708475,0.0005952232,0.0030438704,0.008915415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009564344,0.00026420283,0.00039524666,0.0007242696,0.011768861,0.005831067,0.0038260806,0.0045459713,0.002290175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008801954,0.0000029061548,0.000030337374,0.00001421453,0.0000014318782,0.000026704934,0.00086903374,0.00006535872,0.00006300359,0.9874193,0.0058323946,0.005666476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011487968,0.00001553756,0.00018345969,0.00012660342,0.000006856797,0.00017945954,0.00072615896,0.00048186487,0.0009517151,0.69071805,0.30657807,0.000020673315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030430313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021569568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008915415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039031785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024606942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029825091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000082275","doi":"10.1386/ejpc_00006_1","title":"Conciliatory aggression and the rhetoric of public apologies: A rhetorical analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Blame; Appeal; Rhetorical question; Plea; Rhetoric; Remorse; Criticism; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Literature; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.11587957711850973,"score_gpt":0.2930691115673217,"score_spread":0.17718953444881197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000082275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14483531,0.008361924,0.08268832,0.089932516,0.0022904507,0.00023179295,0.00011159641,0.00029211227,0.67125595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98428506,0.0005515199,0.0041365,0.0021803894,0.00068961293,0.000095299045,0.000020009837,0.0000845588,0.007957076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730032,0.021214271,0.0003724925,0.00091722637,0.0036518266,0.0008409673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92221785,0.06831501,0.003317942,0.0018405521,0.0036953231,0.0006133945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015124838,0.00062236015,0.00064952485,0.0043918923,0.0082205245,0.010629734,0.001844501,0.0067913635,0.005160441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0437741,0.000489364,0.00045436076,0.0019157113,0.029589169,0.009272577,0.0052818977,0.006664069,0.000634487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003916526,0.000028671988,0.00021366558,0.00008954585,0.000008478196,0.00021965626,0.040926334,0.00018880231,0.00027146,0.95017666,0.0036430154,0.0041945893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101781014,0.0001367311,0.0015390469,0.0011792514,0.000049467053,0.00080203696,0.053122997,0.0068128025,0.0020980798,0.6771226,0.25695288,0.0000822958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014642411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001245202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015124838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007871738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029466557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07998878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088504894","doi":"10.1386/ejpc_00012_1","title":"A letter to the editors: Introducing <i>The Examination</i> and <i>The Letter</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Preamble; Irish; Philosophy; Epistemology; Classics; Media studies; Art history; Sociology; History; Linguistics; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.04501369609733363,"score_gpt":0.2398576587504194,"score_spread":0.19484396265308576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088504894","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000668002,0.0024613487,0.00034679347,0.6220183,0.32881558,0.000095603646,0.00017587958,0.00017731026,0.04524132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009150443,0.0019100547,0.00071615854,0.42070472,0.15846494,0.00015042652,0.0001352171,0.00026664932,0.40850145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754757,0.0005059388,0.00025952747,0.0003669973,0.000997979,0.00032203094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927946,0.0021775588,0.00041752186,0.00023977934,0.0030342012,0.0013363312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029034477,0.00085069414,0.0006459074,0.00089796935,0.005264315,0.0054233335,0.001092725,0.017241113,0.028526371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02508636,0.0005704693,0.0006101758,0.0005644619,0.0016349527,0.0036723714,0.0017931124,0.015049872,0.024390958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010474898,0.0000051983543,0.000039387087,0.000014498712,6.751165e-7,0.0001836591,0.000100202575,0.000005493683,0.000076572614,0.0008213312,0.9969664,0.001776157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006199441,0.000011401322,0.00022913449,0.00007515693,0.0000022989946,0.00028637005,0.00047532612,0.000053486812,0.00013296999,0.000794144,0.9979207,0.000012823571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045731263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008098421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028526371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033196784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004615021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095430195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214774454","doi":"10.1386/ejpc_00034_1","title":"Organizational evil and the responsibility of management and managerial practices","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Judgement; Psychology; Subject (documents); Forgetting; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.23151474739515396,"score_gpt":0.4136149943101743,"score_spread":0.18210024691502033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214774454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2519453,0.014603576,0.039765567,0.1685783,0.0010912417,0.00011978108,0.000036972997,0.00008060263,0.5237787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994447,0.00080901984,0.0012028578,0.0010766053,0.0001290293,0.000029573104,0.0000038459652,0.000011647273,0.0022904472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674066,0.025686063,0.00068130065,0.0015260738,0.0027497925,0.0019501542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716125,0.016403442,0.0046582697,0.002862562,0.0021525274,0.0023107657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020972777,0.00039735268,0.0004312515,0.0019566352,0.0054574963,0.012857065,0.0011398921,0.0032698757,0.002517707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023241678,0.00031691664,0.00032835096,0.00085853075,0.08331752,0.0070754536,0.0070687607,0.0036373877,0.000307045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019584822,0.000046654273,0.0024557973,0.00007076846,0.000017956232,0.00012485712,0.04009182,0.00037252263,0.00016476362,0.94459116,0.0011725863,0.0108714495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023985207,0.00006493328,0.0058849296,0.00033179938,0.000014128038,0.00019370805,0.037705414,0.0008897214,0.0002819258,0.9010119,0.05355598,0.00004160857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002263751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014130701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020972777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054789498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062486306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11091596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396611419","doi":"10.1386/ejpc_00058_5","title":"Communauté (Gemeinschaft), Martin Buber (2018)","year":2023,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Empedocles European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication","topic":"Cultural Identity and Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.11018015447773541,"score_gpt":0.2876967685421426,"score_spread":0.1775166140644072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396611419","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033514106,0.94029546,0.00044304103,0.02510903,0.00978536,0.000006980684,0.000299128,0.00012445879,0.023601498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018941695,0.7586722,0.0010118106,0.008808101,0.006599382,0.0000598655,0.0010417062,0.00031535098,0.20454986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928516,0.00016166686,0.000059235947,0.0001700123,0.00021344279,0.0001105224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915576,0.00030570076,0.0001240766,0.000045450717,0.00021075847,0.00015831787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010979505,0.0014147041,0.00071316265,0.001771479,0.0011350126,0.006056402,0.0007364377,0.0031224415,0.060468625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027857984,0.00044170913,0.00028309794,0.003323042,0.0015336586,0.007764664,0.0025690931,0.002961884,0.02997216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029431892,0.000012332702,0.00013746864,0.0010748253,0.000007519579,0.0000458864,0.0004924435,0.000053601732,0.00010541636,0.013934222,0.8172199,0.16688694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038920757,0.0000055134215,0.00069965824,0.00069774856,0.0000032593373,0.000105762534,0.00027677868,0.000013819387,0.000056224082,0.00160842,0.99652314,0.0000058565324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01064486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013127368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060468625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027314252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029935946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20228773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}