{"meta":{"query_hash":"c36d350540b2","filters":{"venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c36d350540b2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=English+Teaching+Practice+%26+Critique"},"results":[{"id":"W2346248260","doi":"10.1108/etpc-05-2015-0042","title":"The changing pedagogical discourses in China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; China; Internationalization; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Pedagogy; Foreign language; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.03001206109088962,"score_gpt":0.33257371382085726,"score_spread":0.30256165272996766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346248260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5767763,0.0015777743,0.0006726005,0.028036399,0.0021544306,0.00024783894,0.000011182313,0.0005249111,0.38999856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97246027,0.00009979804,0.00015238281,0.00096130185,0.0027454186,0.000040269828,0.0000038865824,0.000042745025,0.02349394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971795,0.0013480398,0.00030533882,0.0003286702,0.00025396518,0.0005845074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995583,0.0037937835,0.00014198496,0.00032900745,0.000077450175,0.00007475533],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041426434,0.00020904813,0.00018383175,0.00014851707,0.0015117681,0.00071484415,0.00033005196,0.000066563545,0.00057001435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016340164,0.00011476045,0.000091376176,0.00003765031,0.00018869252,0.001711309,0.00009736738,0.0013418867,0.000044820477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002950791,0.00009232518,0.000176458,0.000008423239,0.000019176046,0.000057297766,0.39447537,0.0000025971733,0.00001937438,0.49798468,0.0011832893,0.10595153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029833254,0.000050767892,0.0001366559,0.00016095304,0.000017136912,0.000017329898,0.2553194,0.000015618522,0.000013615768,0.0005830988,0.7431858,0.00020128046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012863805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013048147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74200255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007129107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038016566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558938202","doi":"10.1108/etpc-09-2016-0109","title":"Through children’s eyes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Early Childhood Education and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Residential school; Feeling; Representativeness heuristic; Psychology; Politics; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.015066134496206831,"score_gpt":0.3612422071536664,"score_spread":0.3461760726574596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558938202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120013185,0.00043897107,0.0058881333,0.18460584,0.00313075,0.00052583124,0.000011180974,0.0010156069,0.6843705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724747,0.0004614191,0.013958743,0.005497138,0.002066418,0.000029658662,0.000004508681,0.000025154171,0.005482271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971433,0.0013818613,0.00025098262,0.0003406523,0.00045790922,0.0004252661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748075,0.0017031176,0.00013038753,0.00024229413,0.0003055069,0.00013795588],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030553667,0.000144936,0.0001340036,0.000057010002,0.0010531773,0.00026262735,0.00032640467,0.00013391342,0.0004952336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031650472,0.000116718795,0.000064381406,0.0001148165,0.00014849038,0.0032824506,0.000052921787,0.00047330183,0.00020948563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013076641,0.0002771662,0.011582972,0.0000037980462,0.000040599967,0.0000054571215,0.36497182,4.3901332e-7,0.000038385246,0.49253985,0.100862525,0.029663881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025902787,0.000023772727,0.01150454,0.000055193814,0.000018038552,0.000005056749,0.026100153,3.614525e-8,0.00013363479,0.0030252063,0.9586282,0.00024716413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035111925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003010264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8577657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021295312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006414202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97650635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564218169","doi":"10.1108/etpc-09-2016-0108","title":"Navigating the “delicate relationship between empathy and critical distance”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Originality; Witness; Identity (music); Curriculum; Critical literacy; Sociology; Pedagogy; Literacy; The arts; Visual arts; Value (mathematics); Critical reading; Narrative; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology; Art; Social science; Reading (process); Literature; Qualitative research; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08169361797581087,"score_gpt":0.4743035237220271,"score_spread":0.39260990574621624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564218169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7382963,0.000671002,0.038004834,0.15894419,0.0019815105,0.0006363202,0.000055397613,0.00058323384,0.060827248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935138,0.000036598845,0.0018837685,0.0016952005,0.0019013133,0.00011776173,0.0000120028835,0.000038799702,0.0008007429],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609494,0.0023910538,0.00047981783,0.00033906024,0.00024109196,0.0004540471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557874,0.043150056,0.00018876784,0.0003645944,0.00033489199,0.00017426329],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051261447,0.00015862493,0.0001684805,0.000021392223,0.0022833836,0.00010301469,0.00018609106,0.00018046882,0.000025393418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.120931685,0.00010144692,0.000040863615,0.00009030888,0.00017809754,0.0017447639,0.00008296669,0.0027474323,0.00009634505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057668425,0.00015241785,0.38146886,0.00020616205,0.000028909395,0.00000642782,0.17048903,9.985122e-7,0.000028560602,0.35071746,0.014181222,0.08266228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056805316,0.000109014894,0.09353217,0.0021240679,0.00013986103,0.000010962066,0.097614,0.000012720863,0.00002117858,0.030788284,0.77459884,0.00048084804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026312805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016121432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76041764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015217869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013448003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963144801","doi":"10.1108/etpc-12-2018-0116","title":"Polic(y)ing time and curriculum: how teachers critically negotiate restrictive policies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Situated; Curriculum; Agency (philosophy); Negotiation; Sociology; Pedagogy; Policy analysis; Politics; Originality; Mathematics education; Political science; Psychology; Public administration; Social science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.027323600130893945,"score_gpt":0.37893112617315355,"score_spread":0.3516075260422596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963144801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4902226,0.00060323376,0.00011070359,0.064381324,0.0014329453,0.00038409437,0.00001071917,0.0006146088,0.44223976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838285,0.0001852713,0.0032435579,0.002932884,0.0019610643,0.000019675528,0.000006773008,0.00005216968,0.0077701462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953273,0.002493775,0.00027078463,0.000558183,0.00054223364,0.0008077103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951927,0.0033925124,0.0001633561,0.0003130432,0.0004943376,0.00044402332],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036052973,0.00026332107,0.00035742897,0.00020117656,0.001250616,0.0006481656,0.0003599789,0.00029228872,0.000092300776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046943314,0.0002876091,0.00009951446,0.0002565795,0.00038076396,0.0022333045,0.00009276571,0.0018102017,0.00007786721],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029385863,0.0003935324,0.005446049,0.000031490563,0.000065662585,0.00002582164,0.69909626,0.000008527917,0.00020874522,0.2667369,0.024330039,0.0036275696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038872365,0.00013442728,0.0006936607,0.00007705145,0.0000758934,0.000011981197,0.3230571,0.000027293205,0.000005618642,0.0006873146,0.67443895,0.00040198115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026021242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032872777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65010893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041705347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045435582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039521006","doi":"10.1108/etpc-10-2019-0140","title":"Making macaroni: classroom improv for transformative embodied critical literacy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Transformative learning; Critical literacy; Assemblage (archaeology); Posthuman; Literacy; Sociology; Improvisation; Critical theory; Pedagogy; Psychology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Visual arts; Art; Geography","score_opus":0.057993896428836546,"score_gpt":0.3745966313939043,"score_spread":0.31660273496506774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039521006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08312504,0.0025833566,0.09359921,0.24778987,0.022699922,0.0044440473,0.0010703773,0.0028960826,0.5417921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637062,0.000025574047,0.009678437,0.01587075,0.009835688,0.00024508892,0.00013412193,0.00007203451,0.00043213324],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750024,0.0005903213,0.0005828139,0.00046643146,0.00029571095,0.00056447403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994805,0.0037155547,0.00015952173,0.00022557797,0.00086527,0.00022909767],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012245141,0.00031131456,0.0003338574,0.000095863026,0.0009850562,0.001430284,0.00028554164,0.00012439606,0.00040225146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018214546,0.00030735103,0.00018591135,0.000041393097,0.00015234548,0.006977497,0.000035043402,0.0013537739,0.000041389907],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014131432,0.00016521497,0.000009304797,0.0003521802,0.00003648936,0.0000064105343,0.7390357,0.0000013845926,0.000010398874,0.23521473,0.012737347,0.012289503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045415357,0.00024889744,0.00000409727,0.00012732767,0.00013156117,0.0000067099386,0.32206085,0.0006986956,0.00007110542,0.003436111,0.6724445,0.00031597487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117780146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026710042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88058114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098798366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001680933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115179505","doi":"10.1108/etpc-06-2020-0055","title":"Reenvisioning space, mobilities and public engagement with young adult literature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Themes in Literature Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilities; Originality; Sociology; Space (punctuation); Value (mathematics); Human geography; Everyday life; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science; Qualitative research; Art","score_opus":0.014986781822309973,"score_gpt":0.2556948525906504,"score_spread":0.24070807076834042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115179505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09811944,0.0069600493,0.0031817658,0.085511126,0.0012139642,0.0009548302,0.00017650556,0.0015551605,0.80232716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98086417,0.00016940133,0.007933691,0.00612951,0.0025276938,0.00005101801,0.00007131995,0.000066948174,0.0021862357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712557,0.0011071765,0.00034655686,0.0005994832,0.00041986135,0.00040135012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723864,0.001091644,0.00019987709,0.00039945194,0.0008486628,0.00022172056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012269712,0.00034415253,0.00033414827,0.00014912829,0.0012171951,0.0033859946,0.0002716493,0.00010254058,0.00029340043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011051544,0.00028116733,0.00008882379,0.000114775015,0.00022236098,0.0048902393,0.000168243,0.0022130269,0.000007853182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006171219,0.0000745039,0.00024469275,0.00010503228,0.00014025021,0.000059467147,0.4300137,0.000005924379,0.000014017855,0.5621503,0.0062316475,0.0008987739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035251732,0.00025165427,0.000015509966,0.0002458588,0.00017262984,0.000026234824,0.2035983,0.00013106725,0.00001930524,0.00038226385,0.79444563,0.0003590018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002442139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027416818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045716934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003706845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230339935","doi":"10.1108/etpc-04-2015-0031","title":"Developing English","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Value (mathematics); Scope (computer science); Insider; The arts; Competition (biology); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Pedagogy; Public relations; Mathematics education; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.05219304274272692,"score_gpt":0.318734499148927,"score_spread":0.2665414564062001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230339935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09353918,0.0008410986,0.0022272735,0.0031331594,0.0054994365,0.00020568984,0.000009779726,0.0016465528,0.89289784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96412635,0.000012967474,0.009851932,0.0068207686,0.009239185,0.000036902595,0.000052083036,0.00009858754,0.009761223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968631,0.0013472592,0.00040310403,0.00044924783,0.0004149041,0.00052238314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996886,0.0013711008,0.00020649358,0.00039596623,0.000909945,0.00023045637],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044478592,0.00029868094,0.00028981286,0.00017586352,0.00083280023,0.0011547538,0.00036671144,0.000119468554,0.00048031742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044112965,0.0002961054,0.00010043443,0.000046263925,0.000113366776,0.0030902026,0.00011730849,0.0021977688,0.00012727911],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021035348,0.00007232862,0.00005135986,0.000020162031,0.00004084885,0.00006107117,0.492304,0.000019412419,0.0000022428064,0.47890508,0.017118735,0.011383732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035769583,0.00006204045,0.000004595776,0.00006915794,0.00003825824,0.000018038807,0.30112123,0.000030832205,0.000020879821,0.00057906803,0.69737947,0.0003187345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026176018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036143276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88313663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018816622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021318007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285725949","doi":"10.1108/etpc-03-2022-0051","title":"Spiritual and religious meaning making in language and literacy studies: global perspectives on teaching, learning, curriculum and policy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Literacy; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Meaning (existential); Spirituality; Epistemology","score_opus":0.013071861963342583,"score_gpt":0.4196892532141658,"score_spread":0.4066173912508232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285725949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88161373,0.0100044375,0.00002270603,0.011268891,0.00026887786,0.00030155806,0.0000050379554,0.00018751077,0.096327245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99247015,0.0033689756,0.0013244081,0.0016846651,0.00065726106,0.000048312304,0.000002722932,0.000020745736,0.00042275447],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99416685,0.0041919607,0.00027514945,0.0005484219,0.00041859428,0.00039904867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978904,0.0014912911,0.00019366041,0.00014855963,0.00013359671,0.00014250858],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054860455,0.00020067133,0.00025419658,0.00022121155,0.0023074609,0.00062284415,0.00016550209,0.000077103585,0.000011812108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05241059,0.00022120058,0.00003455933,0.00023283207,0.00017910336,0.0007182129,0.000238304,0.0022142935,0.0000012997389],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020804902,0.000099481425,0.01048691,0.000016788643,0.000020818321,0.0000481535,0.7608568,0.000019591205,0.0000033155504,0.21651939,0.0028958314,0.009012098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036424404,0.00016541967,0.0006823153,0.00012057887,0.000021405596,0.00005510438,0.8939216,0.00003531584,3.4051368e-7,0.0035172366,0.10088096,0.00023545434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007903416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002523134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21300216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005917373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019447252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367596611","doi":"10.1108/etpc-08-2022-0123","title":"Unsettling childhood literacies: contamination as collaboration in transmedia encounters","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Posthuman; Sociology; Generative grammar; Originality; Value (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Literacy; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Media studies; Aesthetics; Social science; Computer science; Art; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.0107278360903536,"score_gpt":0.31300024819118355,"score_spread":0.30227241210082995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367596611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.947547,0.0002275029,0.0001051113,0.011322048,0.0061780475,0.0005127022,0.000047256814,0.000535769,0.03352452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919168,0.0001792086,0.00024737805,0.0021999648,0.0029772366,0.0001356118,0.0005145632,0.000043369866,0.0017858674],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773335,0.0007180107,0.000475504,0.0003570756,0.00035914616,0.00035692673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711204,0.0019152163,0.00017032016,0.00021487862,0.0004994451,0.000088120294],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025844094,0.0002054822,0.00020064125,0.00044890857,0.00046218783,0.0010100058,0.00017024679,0.00010201963,0.00020517898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009865194,0.000219753,0.000055333316,0.00021379326,0.00007241322,0.005862671,0.000015918708,0.00082538405,0.00011824171],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002819205,0.00021494925,0.00015868519,0.000061609906,0.000015679605,0.000020637113,0.9537607,0.000026670283,0.000014052472,0.0345976,0.005632928,0.0054682936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004246509,0.000079851714,0.00045149453,0.00020648926,0.000030158906,0.000005015774,0.62462205,0.00018066916,0.000049756705,0.0013958582,0.3723366,0.00021739081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083292945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010480072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3667037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001697987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022316228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367843479","doi":"10.1108/etpc-09-2022-0126","title":"Playful pluralities: exploring play and playful literacies across ages, spaces and places","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Child Development and Digital Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Originality; Value (mathematics); Realm; Embodied cognition; Aesthetics; Flourishing; Power (physics); Literacy; Epistemology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Social science; Art; History; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.044605981460921096,"score_gpt":0.3662638872195448,"score_spread":0.3216579057586237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367843479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9405548,0.0008367725,0.000028584564,0.011118898,0.00069104397,0.00025626854,0.000033879678,0.001342121,0.045137644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99124664,0.0028599175,0.0009905867,0.00052610494,0.0005019487,0.00007612913,0.000028445587,0.000033941542,0.003736269],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748945,0.0005178573,0.00032569582,0.00052814576,0.00041665082,0.00072220183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949009,0.0044250097,0.00014477658,0.00020385186,0.00013964107,0.00018584476],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034635942,0.00025754145,0.00029304004,0.0002061831,0.001745414,0.001691506,0.00027837846,0.00022795174,0.000018122135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021282393,0.0002687298,0.000041857278,0.00033562037,0.00050543254,0.0060796947,0.00036204292,0.00088618894,0.000017003107],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005422239,0.000050256287,0.0059421267,0.000069018446,0.000051288003,0.00013202366,0.79818976,0.000003478777,0.00003015968,0.17499758,0.0058085765,0.014671522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028140307,0.000044468783,0.0018002487,0.00012362891,0.000012840201,0.00001966456,0.36704606,0.000007684847,0.00008939328,0.0022891674,0.62796676,0.0003187052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001874356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011774448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62215817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007387929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008392873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379531600","doi":"10.1108/etpc-06-2023-199","title":"Guest editorial: Playful literacies across ages and contexts: new horizons for pleasure, affect, and living texts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Social psychology; Art; Communication","score_opus":0.019062968601781367,"score_gpt":0.3442368961239369,"score_spread":0.3251739275221555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379531600","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019342627,0.0035710272,0.000041374864,0.0009952642,0.9894197,0.0008161007,0.0017521846,0.0005837795,0.000886287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065717422,0.0013907087,0.00033301578,0.00016711387,0.97719735,0.00028908357,0.0011522238,0.00024584157,0.012652899],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956846,0.0009479688,0.0007141309,0.0010013795,0.00080487045,0.00084700115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9453008,0.05167296,0.0006059157,0.00049724744,0.0015388166,0.00038421512],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005353406,0.000723154,0.0008086483,0.00022275856,0.0018423038,0.005608453,0.0003697731,0.0008783483,0.00002366579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17615987,0.00072352495,0.00016320425,0.00005262638,0.00029993977,0.0047156,0.00020864722,0.0032867675,0.000014414427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006493249,0.00008204418,0.000008585015,0.00055764586,0.00009179957,0.0000060504817,0.43154225,1.06786516e-7,9.724258e-7,0.0009126243,0.5647786,0.0019543527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005789086,0.00036351327,0.000014283386,0.0016757165,0.00030020607,0.0000042095553,0.114306346,0.0000017718414,0.0000029104585,0.0004468084,0.88160527,0.00070003426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004751474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032090102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3172359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001404545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000514385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}