{"meta":{"query_hash":"c36d350540b2","filters":{"venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c36d350540b2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=English+Teaching+Practice+%26+Critique"},"results":[{"id":"W2346248260","doi":"10.1108/etpc-05-2015-0042","title":"The changing pedagogical discourses in China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; China; Internationalization; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Pedagogy; Foreign language; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.03001206109088962,"score_gpt":0.33257371382085726,"score_spread":0.30256165272996766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346248260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91110754,0.00511556,0.0008531976,0.022867054,0.00031426805,0.00007237055,0.000055698754,0.00005454908,0.059559867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948665,0.00095628423,0.00020467618,0.00071384804,0.00006979647,0.00003516985,0.000025224641,0.00001318994,0.003115331],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99161446,0.0037158083,0.00044833298,0.0009200046,0.0016828192,0.0016185266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99357855,0.0030133498,0.0010433969,0.0005363119,0.00085409917,0.00097432313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009539712,0.0007793806,0.0007789714,0.0063864803,0.020678323,0.012396562,0.0023182286,0.002525373,0.0025134115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009051311,0.00041517883,0.00053884316,0.009291787,0.031660594,0.007033782,0.008497793,0.004081612,0.00016249933],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016933358,0.000022067934,0.0061714593,0.00011405185,0.000010525749,0.00074583554,0.92077166,0.00013889716,0.000599905,0.05823119,0.0011666826,0.012010797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002414934,0.00006514436,0.026620215,0.00055926584,0.00003818742,0.00038295172,0.83121634,0.0010517538,0.0011719059,0.019308936,0.11946796,0.000093181596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09714069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057604562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09714069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047743045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02793141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34640163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558938202","doi":"10.1108/etpc-09-2016-0109","title":"Through children’s eyes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Early Childhood Education and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Residential school; Feeling; Representativeness heuristic; Psychology; Politics; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.015066134496206831,"score_gpt":0.3612422071536664,"score_spread":0.3461760726574596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558938202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061694372,0.0077014184,0.006060134,0.026841892,0.002583578,0.00015866122,0.00059730455,0.00053621293,0.8938265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7314533,0.00669654,0.0056735184,0.013950675,0.0006144806,0.00026101057,0.0003531008,0.0004712397,0.24052617],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963955,0.0014531012,0.00011910697,0.0005637978,0.0007540049,0.0007143835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981065,0.0005573279,0.000241901,0.00028541096,0.0003746354,0.0004341629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025877785,0.0006702119,0.00056375645,0.001048707,0.009912944,0.011214885,0.0010962533,0.0025789593,0.036877833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065784315,0.0003503327,0.0005302841,0.00082183914,0.010338749,0.007334479,0.010769851,0.0050844424,0.0075917733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010762867,0.00012642123,0.0083567435,0.0005702886,0.000031757194,0.0032116696,0.50867885,0.00010278004,0.0024118843,0.21345866,0.14075181,0.12219147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007092835,0.00003620885,0.0012549621,0.00042442774,0.000009099913,0.0012737659,0.10600595,0.000022571012,0.00034250756,0.007323365,0.8832756,0.00002442436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010682625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014999319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036877833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034966627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039077625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12336868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564218169","doi":"10.1108/etpc-09-2016-0108","title":"Navigating the “delicate relationship between empathy and critical distance”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Originality; Witness; Identity (music); Curriculum; Critical literacy; Sociology; Pedagogy; Literacy; The arts; Visual arts; Value (mathematics); Critical reading; Narrative; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology; Art; Social science; Reading (process); Literature; Qualitative research; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08169361797581087,"score_gpt":0.4743035237220271,"score_spread":0.39260990574621624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564218169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.731556,0.0037553033,0.0359115,0.05047854,0.00049445074,0.00034748288,0.000042878422,0.00013690039,0.1772769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935268,0.000445427,0.0020926704,0.001088068,0.000048416787,0.00008350717,0.000005072877,0.00002965759,0.0026803624],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97806203,0.016971339,0.00036186306,0.0010538073,0.0016405146,0.0019104466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786694,0.015512962,0.0017841385,0.0012027504,0.0010604688,0.0017702584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016645914,0.00057590706,0.00041849978,0.0020341915,0.019599827,0.016814955,0.0019478792,0.0027373442,0.0041972324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017759167,0.00046645614,0.0002591192,0.0009980743,0.0659346,0.011407971,0.017839145,0.0049211187,0.00037047733],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015888,0.00002830649,0.0017483853,0.00012509078,0.0000058071646,0.00037976578,0.93520766,0.000053949047,0.00067358895,0.050451916,0.0010396319,0.010269957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008354213,0.000030964446,0.0014329606,0.00026697214,0.000008523803,0.0003930017,0.9274709,0.00013011356,0.00088806654,0.022312814,0.04704216,0.000015182909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072856965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013325681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019599827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008539557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0093907975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08803302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963144801","doi":"10.1108/etpc-12-2018-0116","title":"Polic(y)ing time and curriculum: how teachers critically negotiate restrictive policies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Situated; Curriculum; Agency (philosophy); Negotiation; Sociology; Pedagogy; Policy analysis; Politics; Originality; Mathematics education; Political science; Psychology; Public administration; Social science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.027323600130893945,"score_gpt":0.37893112617315355,"score_spread":0.3516075260422596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963144801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60800606,0.0032244609,0.102522574,0.06800266,0.00065803906,0.00037187312,0.00009668591,0.00055010826,0.2165675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855665,0.00039547365,0.0060707517,0.0013854994,0.00003088436,0.00015686931,0.000020902427,0.00019983515,0.00617316],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9641953,0.027009645,0.00078168616,0.0030076895,0.0023035654,0.0027021708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9674676,0.022748794,0.0030161133,0.0027541677,0.002088086,0.0019251518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022815874,0.000608427,0.00074539904,0.002021044,0.015384558,0.019667236,0.003087403,0.0055076573,0.0030619232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04923153,0.00090578216,0.00072130666,0.001459255,0.050090343,0.014801886,0.012293466,0.007436041,0.00069321523],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025361453,0.00002894171,0.0030164355,0.00010013044,0.000012811673,0.00051316724,0.9106381,0.00038705856,0.00080238574,0.07177242,0.0019172203,0.010785938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020380687,0.00005227586,0.0018455638,0.0003249811,0.000026378868,0.00024412794,0.78641397,0.0013239081,0.0014448777,0.067854814,0.14039275,0.00005603708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019973785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01831414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022815874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011263541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016204072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120663285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039521006","doi":"10.1108/etpc-10-2019-0140","title":"Making macaroni: classroom improv for transformative embodied critical literacy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Transformative learning; Critical literacy; Assemblage (archaeology); Posthuman; Literacy; Sociology; Improvisation; Critical theory; Pedagogy; Psychology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Visual arts; Art; Geography","score_opus":0.057993896428836546,"score_gpt":0.3745966313939043,"score_spread":0.31660273496506774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039521006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30771786,0.0036896218,0.13440245,0.013251832,0.0010732053,0.0007766562,0.00015992716,0.0015191152,0.5374093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90527564,0.0010114702,0.053213112,0.00080778793,0.00012933767,0.00044773376,0.0001036485,0.00029923004,0.038712062],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973959,0.0015318491,0.00007120605,0.00030162634,0.00041940177,0.0002801296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655944,0.001963669,0.0002481194,0.0005333681,0.00021931047,0.00047600435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029542304,0.00063252315,0.00045379848,0.001262847,0.006294088,0.005669986,0.0017624191,0.0016079679,0.01982594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008844671,0.00030038485,0.00054574275,0.0006497283,0.007784414,0.005811909,0.011355385,0.0031878597,0.0020753262],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030660108,0.00043781954,0.0049120476,0.0010690265,0.000025593621,0.0026419363,0.3590511,0.0011925773,0.012793874,0.3161734,0.016099796,0.28529617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008279397,0.0003668329,0.003408729,0.0012364988,0.000037421127,0.00153883,0.17275058,0.0030947295,0.009927104,0.09501751,0.7124673,0.000071673676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014975601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039094295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01982594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002399052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001994332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06632435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115179505","doi":"10.1108/etpc-06-2020-0055","title":"Reenvisioning space, mobilities and public engagement with young adult literature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Themes in Literature Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilities; Originality; Sociology; Space (punctuation); Value (mathematics); Human geography; Everyday life; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science; Qualitative research; Art","score_opus":0.014986781822309973,"score_gpt":0.2556948525906504,"score_spread":0.24070807076834042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115179505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86525524,0.0048437067,0.012451126,0.0075011104,0.00016054277,0.000076737735,0.000063917505,0.00007994406,0.109567784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946532,0.0008039539,0.0011008983,0.00014563966,0.0000395166,0.000026930456,0.000011729196,0.000020323097,0.0031978101],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718046,0.0020114754,0.00008976663,0.00019716566,0.00031516692,0.00020599469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934788,0.00435735,0.0007955841,0.00051490875,0.0004366308,0.00041664697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00538621,0.00032925,0.00032880675,0.0028619666,0.007263362,0.010844279,0.00079234166,0.0010891815,0.0032732051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00810183,0.00020853705,0.00020552007,0.0015689423,0.026069552,0.005927562,0.0075128386,0.0013048173,0.0003721689],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000889727,0.000009634943,0.0026313178,0.00006699907,0.0000030773724,0.00061406597,0.9300412,0.000043372733,0.00031824224,0.054904096,0.00058006565,0.010779141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020073358,0.000017905255,0.002724255,0.00025907808,0.0000061239234,0.00046560305,0.9215453,0.000082241095,0.0004174835,0.015099574,0.05937259,0.000007775297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030213385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007040589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010844279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030065519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024967242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028485298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230339935","doi":"10.1108/etpc-04-2015-0031","title":"Developing English","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Value (mathematics); Scope (computer science); Insider; The arts; Competition (biology); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Pedagogy; Public relations; Mathematics education; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.05219304274272692,"score_gpt":0.318734499148927,"score_spread":0.2665414564062001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230339935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014839617,0.004901059,0.0074062096,0.021639144,0.0019072907,0.00036870886,0.0009433296,0.0005287568,0.9474658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26553318,0.010631508,0.024644138,0.012890659,0.0006175198,0.00076777925,0.0024761513,0.0010561729,0.68138283],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967654,0.0014779494,0.00022470162,0.00040625746,0.0006533783,0.0004723328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965184,0.00081383146,0.00024076778,0.0004256933,0.0011281149,0.0008732211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035995678,0.0004852217,0.00038475232,0.00079218653,0.0030002324,0.005660002,0.0011323544,0.00083528255,0.065561235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075809,0.0002131522,0.00024358768,0.000691908,0.002204298,0.0058239866,0.0064539057,0.0018516815,0.040897362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047173995,0.00013293885,0.003115844,0.0012157102,0.00001217217,0.0010428193,0.054884184,0.00011725443,0.0026756604,0.2822976,0.28192297,0.37253562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038281587,0.000021224525,0.0011024084,0.00044619216,0.0000024310764,0.00023563248,0.008521873,0.000026874619,0.00032881356,0.0046863286,0.98461664,0.000007719087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031103846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045375447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065561235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002721283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00532221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21932417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285725949","doi":"10.1108/etpc-03-2022-0051","title":"Spiritual and religious meaning making in language and literacy studies: global perspectives on teaching, learning, curriculum and policy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Literacy; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Meaning (existential); Spirituality; Epistemology","score_opus":0.013071861963342583,"score_gpt":0.4196892532141658,"score_spread":0.4066173912508232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285725949","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042939104,0.101455815,0.003752719,0.5991889,0.0174855,0.00007672078,0.00010500618,0.000086023145,0.23491016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86154467,0.047952633,0.0022354266,0.052437384,0.011952679,0.00023542189,0.00009680694,0.00020359829,0.023341391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368405,0.0045230016,0.00020297614,0.00037397465,0.0004916023,0.0007243251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97602355,0.019415718,0.00095680717,0.00072716025,0.0007381033,0.0021387192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008899746,0.00052566774,0.00087283936,0.002676784,0.0071291677,0.019452928,0.0011730761,0.0050165947,0.0075496556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011967146,0.0002409866,0.0004567424,0.003046973,0.032060593,0.013083524,0.010099265,0.010182771,0.000611692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033867836,0.000047411504,0.0010565382,0.00067542645,0.000012524196,0.00044583506,0.11018022,0.00017919486,0.00018326215,0.82534546,0.02942183,0.032418422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018914201,0.00008646156,0.003789058,0.004148445,0.000027049195,0.00028133567,0.16180307,0.0002565742,0.0002951816,0.25969836,0.56955874,0.000036883925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021226641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003169558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019452928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050765583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006133329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047066927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367596611","doi":"10.1108/etpc-08-2022-0123","title":"Unsettling childhood literacies: contamination as collaboration in transmedia encounters","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Posthuman; Sociology; Generative grammar; Originality; Value (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Literacy; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Media studies; Aesthetics; Social science; Computer science; Art; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.0107278360903536,"score_gpt":0.31300024819118355,"score_spread":0.30227241210082995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367596611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9288639,0.0009086763,0.016754463,0.0014943796,0.00005724495,0.00006826801,0.000035410492,0.00009420939,0.051723514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962255,0.00016497694,0.0018053767,0.00008550414,0.000007093834,0.000030084846,0.000011901619,0.000024862653,0.0016447284],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98947877,0.007156179,0.00027824604,0.0010706392,0.0011238044,0.00089235255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881995,0.0073587573,0.0017866702,0.0012883571,0.00045183577,0.00091475155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047188997,0.0006066218,0.0005036451,0.002292463,0.008012373,0.013959104,0.0015473806,0.00152073,0.004423997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014449251,0.00062343705,0.0004405983,0.0011824066,0.024820587,0.010589787,0.018754957,0.002618052,0.00040853492],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003192584,0.000032995933,0.009203657,0.0000946157,0.00001042788,0.001240933,0.9503125,0.00010056106,0.0011386615,0.02804092,0.00020977821,0.0095830755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009488278,0.000105995314,0.007511575,0.00030768992,0.000023311697,0.0021844716,0.93671155,0.0004388572,0.001695997,0.019450331,0.03152064,0.00004007478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021002435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032756736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013959104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027908948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019277628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024956226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367843479","doi":"10.1108/etpc-09-2022-0126","title":"Playful pluralities: exploring play and playful literacies across ages, spaces and places","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Child Development and Digital Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Originality; Value (mathematics); Realm; Embodied cognition; Aesthetics; Flourishing; Power (physics); Literacy; Epistemology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Social science; Art; History; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.044605981460921096,"score_gpt":0.3662638872195448,"score_spread":0.3216579057586237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367843479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71032643,0.012367982,0.029125787,0.007900049,0.0002324089,0.00021442266,0.00021230342,0.000121699195,0.23949887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98792857,0.0021061802,0.003321033,0.00038999278,0.000043548367,0.000102876336,0.000052086783,0.000053056185,0.0060026045],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996488,0.0020194752,0.00013243686,0.0004867153,0.00040472805,0.00046868328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964335,0.0022138339,0.0004379923,0.00025211577,0.00014726132,0.0005152383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003903019,0.00055271597,0.0005349156,0.004127277,0.007008908,0.018862987,0.0014787244,0.001631228,0.0042107827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051496956,0.00036297555,0.0005644296,0.0020790664,0.02726558,0.012121768,0.01380399,0.002214049,0.0004469489],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004637244,0.000046777925,0.0051787584,0.00032049205,0.000019751958,0.00087255385,0.84610325,0.000110664165,0.0005961598,0.11755585,0.00093778595,0.028211575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011974491,0.00006644819,0.007602255,0.0008603043,0.000031374617,0.0016243133,0.84820944,0.00050401967,0.00046883436,0.055518888,0.085069776,0.00003244891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037487904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008465012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018862987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003524949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002609888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0255754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379531600","doi":"10.1108/etpc-06-2023-199","title":"Guest editorial: Playful literacies across ages and contexts: new horizons for pleasure, affect, and living texts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"English Teaching Practice & Critique","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Social psychology; Art; Communication","score_opus":0.019062968601781367,"score_gpt":0.3442368961239369,"score_spread":0.3251739275221555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379531600","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018897608,0.0037577346,0.0001541231,0.0514591,0.9427685,0.000017077295,0.000045835564,0.00005161069,0.0015570737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016236117,0.0033000663,0.00009957823,0.014613438,0.9742638,0.000025682468,0.000021432408,0.000054711203,0.005997744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967618,0.00053172355,0.00027282358,0.0007402572,0.0013677778,0.00032560012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838811,0.008252391,0.0006932446,0.0004108498,0.004466008,0.0022963206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037868225,0.0023095114,0.0020776342,0.0019820367,0.0033144653,0.009742143,0.0028640574,0.0105894115,0.01773311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018592466,0.0007151548,0.0017810523,0.00073995255,0.0037272628,0.004771285,0.0026175056,0.017439028,0.0070687835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004691577,0.000021339418,0.000109888715,0.0002305708,0.000010415625,0.00024164857,0.00017780536,0.000026457632,0.0001198635,0.00066707155,0.99205786,0.006290292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037458172,0.000058875034,0.0005739361,0.0007453102,0.000038176313,0.00083341927,0.00066282245,0.0001965811,0.00027118,0.0020043203,0.99454546,0.000032470252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010372832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019683198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01773311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018817739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024851072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059323132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}