{"meta":{"query_hash":"2cce91853685","filters":{"venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2cce91853685","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Enterprise+Governance+eJournal"},"results":[{"id":"W1472680384","doi":"10.53300/001c.6926","title":"A case of champagne: A study of geographical indications","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Food systems; Population; Government (linguistics); Food processing; Subsidy; Economic growth; Business; Agriculture; Political science; Public administration; Economics; Geography; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.011301653912749407,"score_gpt":0.22516732878935458,"score_spread":0.21386567487660518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1472680384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44645768,0.004047707,0.0016768676,0.08132006,0.00027229462,0.00016484222,0.00022579722,0.000043247725,0.46579152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96250564,0.0014894501,0.0007317682,0.0044875,0.00009291196,0.000071462826,0.0000832728,0.00004984002,0.030488119],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995821,0.002034323,0.000079326244,0.00040849563,0.0006977126,0.0009592066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928877,0.0037743992,0.00074344303,0.0003481033,0.0011042294,0.0011422579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030398434,0.00031662371,0.00038511248,0.003583902,0.018521067,0.008491436,0.0029267904,0.004472909,0.018188193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014897193,0.0003108057,0.0002998138,0.0062839743,0.013857542,0.0066753784,0.0055481987,0.004990768,0.0007720499],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078236095,0.00009310324,0.025059044,0.00017683313,0.000016914853,0.018754758,0.4630869,0.00024342793,0.00035345976,0.4272955,0.039997254,0.024844596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001347847,0.00003532856,0.017469238,0.00047751772,0.0000134947395,0.004172796,0.6682603,0.0006001215,0.00016061639,0.018820167,0.2899306,0.000046302095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30796444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39487588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30796444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017934285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010703852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6123438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499187758","doi":"10.53300/001c.6913","title":"Corporate Social Responsibility – A Well-Meaning But Unworkable Concept","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Shareholder; Corporate social responsibility; Stakeholder; Shareholder primacy; Meaning (existential); Business; Stakeholder theory; Public relations; Corporate governance; Social responsibility; Accounting; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Finance; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022866643616335648,"score_gpt":0.2510156367326284,"score_spread":0.22814899311629275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499187758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008721452,0.07597831,0.031013813,0.7063367,0.011781329,0.00005492776,0.00010542184,0.00013210671,0.16587599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7149048,0.089620575,0.019510375,0.10942684,0.02451826,0.000248834,0.00012387907,0.00019091705,0.04145554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99196565,0.0038217956,0.00027251165,0.0007378079,0.0027286026,0.00047356982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918005,0.0050168997,0.0006457141,0.00056004553,0.0013024156,0.00067442155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00854423,0.0007336962,0.00068726006,0.0022640538,0.004458354,0.010851651,0.0015422528,0.0053855204,0.0031650625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010171366,0.0002311293,0.0004637555,0.0022740944,0.053005334,0.019194087,0.0058363327,0.010951719,0.0009471604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056154136,0.000010660381,0.00015070762,0.00006658819,0.000004290215,0.000044124736,0.001803465,0.000086944994,0.00007193936,0.9714877,0.01572135,0.010546625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049982627,0.000021222984,0.00025172305,0.0004007551,0.0000031093787,0.00012619475,0.0022923765,0.00018461344,0.000110888606,0.7504868,0.24609976,0.000017588014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00217845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015027347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010851651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043156836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051464476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045186758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551576429","doi":"10.53300/001c.6899","title":"The Statutory Derivative Action in Australia: An Empirical Review of its Use and Effectiveness in Australia in Comparison to the United States, Canada and Singapore","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Notice; Jurisdiction; Action (physics); Political science; Law; Common law; Empirical research; Derivative (finance); Business; Finance","score_opus":0.0643303785036615,"score_gpt":0.3245597409637282,"score_spread":0.26022936246006667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551576429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9161784,0.035598043,0.00046363616,0.0025258993,0.000059731356,0.000079517,0.00011066954,0.000012649958,0.04497154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749399,0.021435024,0.00038637852,0.00041823962,0.000024528768,0.000012860818,0.00006530259,0.000009617722,0.0027081594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911634,0.0027011533,0.00074502104,0.0003594625,0.004630693,0.00040035578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489064,0.021576894,0.012627739,0.0011063562,0.014083353,0.0016991621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007150175,0.0001070766,0.00036883602,0.0028443146,0.0020971838,0.003111572,0.0005381898,0.00047373644,0.0014645297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03143374,0.00021787426,0.00025470633,0.007861116,0.002944313,0.0019314582,0.0013041272,0.0010784541,0.00018687324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024135898,0.00046471745,0.4869339,0.004209257,0.00023693414,0.0016700506,0.073240675,0.0010817671,0.0016705922,0.03349288,0.008789216,0.3879686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013082476,0.00029555216,0.8773956,0.0019160908,0.00016689226,0.0005664861,0.03013994,0.00096308696,0.0011118911,0.0007484626,0.08662709,0.000055872002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22423133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33556455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77576864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007340689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010461121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44585234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144607359","doi":"10.53300/001c.10815","title":"Why Hayne May Change Compliance Internationally","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Securities Regulation and Market Practices","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Compliance (psychology); Remuneration; Business; Mandate; Accountability; Misconduct; Corporate governance; Accounting; Public relations; Best practice; Commission; Political science; Finance; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.031736548585752866,"score_gpt":0.26188693509979705,"score_spread":0.23015038651404418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144607359","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01653199,0.0021835237,0.0030650336,0.9085225,0.0079088975,0.000100691504,0.000033390046,0.00042546168,0.0612285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13800523,0.0010868332,0.0028494291,0.7378741,0.0012927221,0.00012221243,0.00004361614,0.0003146023,0.118411236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9398705,0.019036984,0.0025896102,0.0071252226,0.021295205,0.010082495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9164991,0.024311498,0.005429957,0.0084440615,0.027396886,0.01791852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03820341,0.0003892176,0.00050695933,0.0009024772,0.012749346,0.0133156665,0.0028061448,0.021492759,0.03256576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10251956,0.0009350343,0.00089842203,0.00084951194,0.013765289,0.0146929715,0.008326363,0.027101422,0.008108712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007111906,0.00033168023,0.008663064,0.0002777817,0.000036102105,0.0017001138,0.016120702,0.00023063572,0.0014311358,0.110429086,0.7772656,0.083442934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034309793,0.00014591755,0.004768343,0.00043553067,0.000011114025,0.0006818498,0.010935918,0.00029377232,0.00078661944,0.013417413,0.96837974,0.00010934765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023915913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024800656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03820341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008950665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021959532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20204133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151014515","doi":"10.53300/001c.10816","title":"Impact Analysis: ASIC is Firm About Psychologists in Board Rooms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Plan (archaeology); Criticism; Accounting; Application-specific integrated circuit; Business; Management; Political science; Engineering; Finance; Economics; Law; History","score_opus":0.020744540679548396,"score_gpt":0.2809341795152566,"score_spread":0.2601896388357082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151014515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038339183,0.004366115,0.026598053,0.04818093,0.0041909628,0.0009294072,0.023192963,0.0012379138,0.85296446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5688338,0.005287306,0.013538711,0.0080754645,0.003094796,0.0013275145,0.013064545,0.00069014204,0.38608772],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897425,0.0021452538,0.00033069373,0.0005377801,0.006588888,0.00065488793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805344,0.005123296,0.0020241241,0.0014926037,0.009484428,0.0013410733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053554825,0.00072862586,0.0007042217,0.0057172803,0.0016105252,0.005382188,0.0010399122,0.0011173902,0.11378996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026335584,0.0003137606,0.00079024915,0.011134502,0.0011887187,0.0028368116,0.0018490868,0.0025837386,0.010827744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028838078,0.0001633293,0.020368265,0.00080150785,0.00011748885,0.00008590694,0.00063788495,0.002310426,0.00031673355,0.09310463,0.6500498,0.23175561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001339702,0.0003668976,0.13903978,0.00068326504,0.00021168673,0.0001456627,0.0025616612,0.007317205,0.0013562099,0.054452907,0.7936392,0.00009160989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0415851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038748033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11378996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005381711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050210906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38066536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}