{"meta":{"query_hash":"2cce91853685","filters":{"venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2cce91853685","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Enterprise+Governance+eJournal"},"results":[{"id":"W1472680384","doi":"10.53300/001c.6926","title":"A case of champagne: A study of geographical indications","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Food systems; Population; Government (linguistics); Food processing; Subsidy; Economic growth; Business; Agriculture; Political science; Public administration; Economics; Geography; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.011301653912749407,"score_gpt":0.22516732878935458,"score_spread":0.21386567487660518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1472680384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99618244,0.000049437906,0.00009430441,0.0008640484,0.0001744085,0.00027269303,0.000004969753,0.00001684179,0.002340851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984454,0.0000050331014,0.000047954887,0.00011657574,0.0012419159,0.000024813318,9.960725e-7,0.000012208982,0.00010512021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989009,0.000013688684,0.0004610999,0.0001547798,0.00028519347,0.00018434793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987823,0.000028950471,0.0007634784,0.00024133042,0.00016210906,0.000021838094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001790755,0.00012412354,0.00022065986,0.00013720944,0.00009916484,0.000059992148,0.00024607294,0.000057690995,0.0012541475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009400472,0.00010751374,0.000099272824,0.00042925926,0.00006181408,0.0007798749,0.00012584134,0.00027675438,0.000050666582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007938462,0.003914047,0.939229,0.00010894951,0.00021923751,0.0008219373,0.0009962055,0.00007631951,0.00045573432,0.0018067174,0.045091912,0.0072005265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025886334,0.00015413319,0.9866987,0.00018567381,0.00013084275,0.00056629593,0.002488972,0.000806966,0.00010073102,0.001397457,0.0045966567,0.00028496815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029514292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004373156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047469642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010762024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001809895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499187758","doi":"10.53300/001c.6913","title":"Corporate Social Responsibility – A Well-Meaning But Unworkable Concept","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Shareholder; Corporate social responsibility; Stakeholder; Shareholder primacy; Meaning (existential); Business; Stakeholder theory; Public relations; Corporate governance; Social responsibility; Accounting; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Finance; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022866643616335648,"score_gpt":0.2510156367326284,"score_spread":0.22814899311629275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499187758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9573328,0.0001710778,0.0012405929,0.0032967539,0.0009687387,0.00037418105,0.000010119321,0.00027137928,0.036334384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907976,0.000012839586,0.00034507472,0.0027082106,0.0032734708,0.0000059259955,0.00001039593,0.00004233341,0.0028041925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963949,0.00008676411,0.0010754091,0.0006695767,0.0009722393,0.0008011276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597,0.000101070196,0.0030194444,0.00041970695,0.00042968756,0.000060108323],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018583053,0.0004015414,0.0005545939,0.00012503243,0.0008483791,0.0007296894,0.0005285357,0.0001656844,0.00081949745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014869764,0.0004123517,0.00035931673,0.00088562956,0.00017084405,0.0019107152,0.00021807982,0.00073697546,0.00033870945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011933881,0.0022092788,0.4362195,0.000269522,0.00036613145,0.00407166,0.0036887517,0.0011431018,0.03335196,0.12959705,0.11268551,0.26446363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004584439,0.00016863951,0.7308439,0.0005526083,0.00023244153,0.00014790543,0.0021053278,0.004823248,0.0013457428,0.15859732,0.09445877,0.0021396524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030251217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012638878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2946244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040466862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026427864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551576429","doi":"10.53300/001c.6899","title":"The Statutory Derivative Action in Australia: An Empirical Review of its Use and Effectiveness in Australia in Comparison to the United States, Canada and Singapore","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Notice; Jurisdiction; Action (physics); Political science; Law; Common law; Empirical research; Derivative (finance); Business; Finance","score_opus":0.0643303785036615,"score_gpt":0.3245597409637282,"score_spread":0.26022936246006667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551576429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99521184,0.0023636403,0.000028773786,0.0018707487,0.00015085256,0.00034651134,0.000018873023,0.0000035896278,0.000005168036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99468565,0.004251033,0.000020155678,0.00087321165,0.000095150484,0.000015348658,0.000008732436,0.000009286396,0.000041461317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861205,0.00010728269,0.00049166934,0.0002153782,0.0003080788,0.00026553829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907064,0.00016348615,0.00049810734,0.00013988842,0.00010176249,0.000026102723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007925315,0.00016706654,0.0002715927,0.00006787678,0.00008566653,0.00012251707,0.00018589938,0.000037798934,0.000012977225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002700592,0.0001173951,0.000020624033,0.00061519456,0.000052074436,0.0010881037,0.00007921328,0.00042420998,0.0000012816739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033600617,0.000102090555,0.98791003,0.0004940729,0.0000100717225,0.00003701497,0.0003182632,0.0038415208,0.00004579399,0.00014933622,0.0039808415,0.002774965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050998165,0.000020972797,0.92969793,0.0034528961,0.000008947116,0.0000043554282,0.00014152066,0.0022707523,0.000044732406,0.000040008345,0.063680254,0.00012767148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37289608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8495251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47662905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031540912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000779569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6312799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144607359","doi":"10.53300/001c.10815","title":"Why Hayne May Change Compliance Internationally","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Securities Regulation and Market Practices","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Compliance (psychology); Remuneration; Business; Mandate; Accountability; Misconduct; Corporate governance; Accounting; Public relations; Best practice; Commission; Political science; Finance; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.031736548585752866,"score_gpt":0.26188693509979705,"score_spread":0.23015038651404418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144607359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6195852,0.001308758,0.0021623187,0.042096246,0.008526599,0.00072655204,0.000024272913,0.0002539184,0.3253161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961494,0.00014190748,0.00020155672,0.029581783,0.0024393913,0.000017227561,0.000014319084,0.000029190956,0.006080622],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861974,0.000013262271,0.00028505892,0.00025175398,0.00053233776,0.00029787503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989676,0.000048512164,0.0005973773,0.0002125793,0.00015310159,0.000020853295],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027673508,0.00017448778,0.00017812364,0.0000892554,0.000113408445,0.00046754477,0.00041282494,0.000044937053,0.008386212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088947636,0.00016731644,0.00011078026,0.00017759865,0.000033170236,0.0037907541,0.00019539516,0.00022164492,0.0015738421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008420119,0.00044241588,0.4175664,0.00040560635,0.00019971003,0.00010728551,0.0004486314,0.00010210331,0.0006295774,0.13222523,0.40502852,0.042002503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007224151,0.000008162945,0.1368486,0.00023952348,0.000012388562,0.000019253961,0.00008891787,0.004189113,0.000012251655,0.000545157,0.8571202,0.00019398653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025424975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009035563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4520917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007337541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014145533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151014515","doi":"10.53300/001c.10816","title":"Impact Analysis: ASIC is Firm About Psychologists in Board Rooms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Enterprise Governance eJournal","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thomson Reuters (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Plan (archaeology); Criticism; Accounting; Application-specific integrated circuit; Business; Management; Political science; Engineering; Finance; Economics; Law; History","score_opus":0.020744540679548396,"score_gpt":0.2809341795152566,"score_spread":0.2601896388357082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151014515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719567,0.002699708,0.00038247564,0.0006100494,0.000595582,0.00014489572,0.00012446287,0.000022435224,0.023463706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946704,0.001519393,0.00014914009,0.00052531174,0.000091322465,0.0000059870263,0.000009412235,0.000022585133,0.0030064743],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818397,0.00003840785,0.0007858218,0.0003539742,0.00011820533,0.0005196016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985726,0.000048657002,0.00070404273,0.00050498545,0.000026406704,0.00014330793],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006363562,0.00024198636,0.00069571903,0.0003318225,0.000091785754,0.0001871395,0.0005923052,0.00013479481,0.005619485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007771484,0.00025588775,0.00053965964,0.0009256502,0.00003677708,0.0005103347,0.00009988134,0.0005897779,0.0014948049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006385659,0.00015595484,0.9918461,0.0000049583546,0.00036482955,0.00001717804,0.0019431481,0.0001523665,0.0000052138657,0.00040025535,0.0031935058,0.0018526469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010079176,0.00007584999,0.9880753,0.000048039736,0.000016267586,0.0000052279393,0.00007344409,0.00065756496,0.000004276881,0.0018557576,0.00787971,0.00030065735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015373342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000450296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02271369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058531767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048178936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}