{"meta":{"query_hash":"db305dfec0c9","filters":{"venue":"Environmental DNA"},"cohort_total":144,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":144,"exported":144,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/db305dfec0c9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Environmental+DNA"},"results":[{"id":"W2937376009","doi":"10.1002/edn3.7","title":"Meta‐analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species‐specific abundance in nature","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Biology; Relative species abundance; Natural (archaeology); Environmental science","score_opus":0.020113966745113662,"score_gpt":0.22173623223537486,"score_spread":0.2016222654902612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937376009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994649,0.0013540547,0.000048727128,0.00021588655,0.00022392641,0.0008783305,0.00015600419,0.000018855373,0.0024552254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903914,0.00044885682,0.004827253,0.00007285909,0.000029219267,0.00007268788,0.00005713128,0.000028612592,0.0040719924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974394,0.00006241344,0.00050883356,0.0007813447,0.00071671,0.00049130805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989008,0.00012208018,0.0002541756,0.0006269669,9.75564e-7,0.00009502155],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028860557,0.00036590267,0.0007858302,0.0001334538,0.00009684708,0.000015826325,0.0004326439,0.00016308881,0.0123623265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000050905405,0.000348182,0.00063048204,0.0003384711,0.0003412675,0.0002398782,0.0004684924,0.00024266324,0.00086106296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004413198,0.00033420578,0.9437253,0.000018243361,0.0046202997,0.0000075683265,0.00083412655,0.0012371831,0.04867626,0.000009349251,0.00028892027,0.00020442298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006970053,0.00015531288,0.9535154,0.000007250228,0.005077156,0.0000014673532,0.0012145257,0.00005998528,0.029033266,0.0000655366,0.009739973,0.0004331241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007283411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034177297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019642994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061911193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000016259269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946940689","doi":"10.1002/edn3.18","title":"Welcome to Environmental DNA!","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Metagenomics; Publication; Relevance (law); Ecology; Biology; Ancient DNA; Field (mathematics); Data science; Evolutionary biology; Computational biology; Geography; Biodiversity; Computer science; Genetics; Political science; Sociology; Gene","score_opus":0.005958398789608377,"score_gpt":0.17649516461089784,"score_spread":0.17053676582128946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946940689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750136,0.000070951784,0.000021548485,0.0003892561,0.0007662626,0.0010926882,0.0002299232,0.0001202804,0.022295464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98112947,0.00010224443,0.002312228,0.0018175893,0.00011257982,0.000054592496,0.000100286445,0.000076528406,0.014294463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960177,0.000092735514,0.0004516005,0.0013034435,0.0011470106,0.0009874973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983078,0.00006466088,0.00013698095,0.0009695631,3.650735e-7,0.00052062894],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022482069,0.000627758,0.00045065006,0.000092756025,0.0003787696,0.000048972637,0.0008644205,0.00018000418,0.061836325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008558852,0.0006574519,0.0002437993,0.00017766126,0.0005531487,0.00050115376,0.0022941837,0.0003091312,0.2019169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047149995,0.00036384896,0.7473694,0.0000050666345,0.000044415116,0.000024634397,0.0005563361,0.0002976484,0.24123958,0.0000106749785,0.007814541,0.0022267243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007854957,0.00034410285,0.82262653,0.000010660695,0.000030874937,0.000021727601,0.00080435217,0.00003195602,0.020822637,0.000052240237,0.1536748,0.00079461717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005546469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007678934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22041695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015397362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001913856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952272889","doi":"10.1002/edn3.17","title":"High‐resolution biomonitoring of plant pathogens and plant species using metabarcoding of pollen pellet contents collected from a honey bee hive","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","funders":"Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Biology; Pollen; Phytophthora; Pythium; Quarantine; Botany; Invasive species; Ecology","score_opus":0.03556756965370622,"score_gpt":0.17414847923134186,"score_spread":0.13858090957763564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952272889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915606,0.00057002064,5.698322e-7,0.000020636386,0.00005850077,0.0001383913,0.00759926,0.0000073831616,0.00004468832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99920326,0.00037571858,0.000096149175,0.000005910022,0.00006641438,0.0000012542856,0.00017000882,9.467928e-7,0.00008032399],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993058,0.000031867214,0.00017732219,0.00017701389,0.00015988514,0.00014810609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997282,0.00009389158,0.00012313444,0.000015697158,0.0000027065994,0.000036388858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004186951,0.000110386114,0.00024594314,0.000012736188,0.00009766264,0.000008199559,0.00006981638,0.00004120016,0.00014552037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005288414,0.00005096592,0.00004892148,0.000054039767,0.00007593742,0.00005275106,0.00011655019,0.000040544925,0.0000047179997],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007116194,0.000040737774,0.12929104,0.0000035272353,0.000040965657,0.0000030163992,0.00014180585,0.0000016092147,0.87024933,0.000011601959,0.00002103548,0.00012419517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024148566,0.00012927226,0.7523633,0.00004615997,0.000026743382,0.0000030278893,0.0013031671,0.000095518066,0.24543707,0.0000111992595,0.00024466973,0.00009834215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007661196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013989842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62481225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026902791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001029729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20783299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962568139","doi":"10.1002/edn3.62","title":"A new primer for metabarcoding of spider gut contents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Primer (cosmetics); Biology; Invertebrate; Spider; Predation; Zoology; Predator; Clade; In silico; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Phylogenetic tree; Genetics; Gene; Chemistry","score_opus":0.016593724647661998,"score_gpt":0.2113660635360616,"score_spread":0.19477233888839962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962568139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99164814,0.00017725385,0.00041806692,0.000095023905,0.00024109193,0.0009165355,0.00009112467,0.000025206497,0.0063875536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97182816,0.00005917643,0.018396344,0.00023102094,0.000029381808,0.00001722013,0.000029027233,0.00002793007,0.009381715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983258,0.000027781607,0.00030369344,0.0005066663,0.0004521054,0.00038391724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925405,0.00007202773,0.00016546858,0.00036657054,7.5381683e-7,0.00014113837],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012703141,0.00025507616,0.00032474796,0.000033924447,0.00010777373,0.000009441924,0.00033791276,0.00007893066,0.012885082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012750165,0.00024927195,0.00020597687,0.00006606977,0.00025001136,0.0002788624,0.00057860086,0.00009086879,0.003643405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041126157,0.00013652781,0.62178993,0.000009883807,0.000061850806,9.903928e-7,0.00021194873,0.00006303829,0.3711975,0.00003292863,0.004051107,0.0024031652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016356651,0.0003119628,0.8507719,0.000015952144,0.00008153264,0.0000036521424,0.00046346898,0.000050764487,0.10685837,0.00013874494,0.039291803,0.00037614885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001536705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000042333972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26433912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027076382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017259002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973214152","doi":"10.1002/edn3.33","title":"Assessing different components of diversity across a river network using eDNA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Universität Zürich; Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich; Velux Stiftung; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Gamma diversity; Beta diversity; Nestedness; Taxon; Environmental DNA; Ecology; Alpha diversity; Ecosystem diversity; Identification (biology); Sampling (signal processing); River ecosystem; Biology; Scale (ratio); Geography; Ecosystem; Cartography","score_opus":0.03297630764086952,"score_gpt":0.24209651532838006,"score_spread":0.20912020768751055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973214152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99748045,0.00006771508,0.000050557406,0.000015560066,0.00036323743,0.0004052605,0.00007914796,0.00003201509,0.0015060346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99692893,0.000047925198,0.0024299629,0.0001237644,0.000036656475,0.000002284935,0.000039753202,0.000024095356,0.00036660448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751395,0.0001018259,0.0003198826,0.0006169628,0.00080421584,0.00064315996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990794,0.00006141415,0.00025631004,0.0004535949,9.4948865e-7,0.00014833575],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018613235,0.00035244168,0.00041177907,0.000021653026,0.0006729135,0.000028688943,0.0005013419,0.00011954761,0.003473832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000038384337,0.0003490168,0.000193446,0.00010911837,0.0009941864,0.0006190623,0.0051795165,0.00019989375,0.0014920885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026828495,0.0002675718,0.8937253,0.0000111020145,0.0000563773,0.00000777126,0.001055106,0.0018143788,0.10231961,0.000003322802,0.00016719737,0.0005454702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007675674,0.0000771995,0.99214476,0.00003170178,0.000048996913,0.0000056262725,0.0010017031,0.00048527008,0.004258515,0.00006086986,0.00074505183,0.00037272964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039910848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009681955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09841951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008193771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":8.6645167e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974095620","doi":"10.1002/edn3.29","title":"Reporting the limits of detection and quantification for environmental DNA assays","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":566,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Victoria","funders":"National Wildlife Research Center; Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; Innovate BC; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Standardization; Detection limit; Computational biology; Biology; Limit (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Data mining; Computer science; Ecology; Statistics; Mathematics; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.022399680103801663,"score_gpt":0.22161192126742696,"score_spread":0.1992122411636253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974095620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964284,0.00014120198,0.00022622327,0.00014521206,0.00019580619,0.0010844319,0.000094905416,0.00002625664,0.00165759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972605,0.00017903658,0.0009483593,0.00011027926,0.00002907953,0.000055530116,0.000043437252,0.000028401155,0.0013453945],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978054,0.0000691236,0.0006932011,0.0006214528,0.00047294196,0.00033787137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842757,0.0001586725,0.0008575524,0.0004753294,7.3625415e-7,0.00008015367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062107004,0.00026781514,0.00028022955,0.000033364442,0.00038348872,0.000021698,0.00025587805,0.0001120803,0.0008434019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051106344,0.0002269072,0.00014263787,0.00006730588,0.00069798104,0.00028567947,0.00038689785,0.00014492554,0.00057656615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003120857,0.00009835308,0.4110963,0.000011094904,0.000026459593,7.181841e-7,0.00028721162,0.00007474902,0.5800162,0.000007719574,0.000096578915,0.008253432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045438792,0.00020595787,0.7899522,0.00000858016,0.00005501999,0.000014954416,0.0012080302,0.0003813113,0.20172745,0.00006645863,0.0056861327,0.00023948392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002897687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001018955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37885594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033292832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000012520211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9253007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975566040","doi":"10.1002/edn3.30","title":"Recreational water monitoring: Nanofluidic qRT‐PCR chip for assessing beach water safety","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"TaqMan; Contamination; Biology; Virulence; Polymerase chain reaction; Environmental science; Gene; Ecology; Genetics","score_opus":0.01658149413686141,"score_gpt":0.24321296441356058,"score_spread":0.22663147027669917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975566040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916268,0.000021286049,0.00051421515,0.00043988004,0.0004276363,0.0005214273,0.000026409847,0.000045787958,0.0063765333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98475623,0.000009022978,0.00067995087,0.00023336458,0.00011455021,0.000053029315,0.000492892,0.000033117416,0.013627832],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812984,0.00009966685,0.00033134897,0.0005025226,0.00045605088,0.00048055287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994851,0.000048711074,0.000042571057,0.00028893544,0.0000019484287,0.00013273822],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005134922,0.00022628694,0.00018855848,0.000029564966,0.00026757317,0.00007036194,0.00022232113,0.00011158688,0.010598723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000059978556,0.0001540423,0.00012271477,0.000027533768,0.00012910692,0.0005464232,0.00021705384,0.00012521663,0.004587156],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004609287,0.00013516465,0.17566882,0.000011280887,0.000014805231,0.000001457973,0.0007230202,0.00007354875,0.8185887,0.00003189962,0.0002730923,0.004432159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007525072,0.00006919956,0.31922668,0.000011518554,0.000014142511,0.0000039406978,0.00016045332,0.00013738431,0.61560047,0.0002578163,0.06347478,0.00029113094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026015148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.851105e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20298822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047471497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028156037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99618787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980835560","doi":"10.1002/edn3.35","title":"Comparing eDNA metabarcoding and species collection for documenting Arctic metazoan biodiversity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Churchill Northern Studies Centre; ArcticNet","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Arctic; Ecology; Phylum; Species richness; Biology; Invertebrate; Beta diversity; Marine biodiversity; DNA barcoding; Pelagic zone; Fishery","score_opus":0.017269662289115195,"score_gpt":0.19035872546235721,"score_spread":0.17308906317324202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980835560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994654,0.00013643884,0.00007609368,0.00014314166,0.00024779298,0.0007697053,0.000044059514,0.000049312835,0.0038794752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919807,0.00017619925,0.004111693,0.00016084217,0.000025074094,0.000019332148,0.000044856486,0.000014498175,0.0034668245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823916,0.000050358092,0.0002259252,0.0006559682,0.00038049702,0.00044809998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994051,0.00009719589,0.00013440104,0.00023853531,0.0000010762403,0.00012372698],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026335902,0.00028792693,0.00032056464,0.000061148814,0.0006792866,0.000062337116,0.00021768225,0.0000686856,0.0026494423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000146249395,0.00030522974,0.00013276194,0.00010520451,0.0004261439,0.0005092475,0.00092027325,0.00013573577,0.0015036187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035691708,0.0000774567,0.93566847,0.000021238846,0.00007375505,0.0000017110264,0.0004876275,0.0000820214,0.06252015,0.000017882261,0.0007798608,0.00023414366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011249532,0.00012778131,0.96853834,0.000011678147,0.00012469833,0.000008423356,0.0017025796,0.00028397003,0.013835904,0.00007168404,0.013774335,0.0003956395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012733915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002029705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048684247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066124386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":9.858131e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982308128","doi":"10.1002/edn3.46","title":"Fly‐derived DNA and camera traps are complementary tools for assessing mammalian biodiversity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Infection and Immunity","funders":"German Academic Exchange Service London; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft","keywords":"Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Environmental DNA; Ecology; Biology; Invertebrate; Habitat; Transect; Ecosystem; Abundance (ecology); Alpha diversity","score_opus":0.021782225995154225,"score_gpt":0.21384583541991575,"score_spread":0.19206360942476153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982308128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958251,0.000089271685,0.000049170078,0.00056286907,0.00026398085,0.0010978896,0.00084958546,0.000056787416,0.0012053237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939355,0.00011232466,0.00390981,0.0011137598,0.000037799142,0.000026246722,0.00029757855,0.00002452023,0.00054241205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762464,0.00007565163,0.0002927255,0.00090017443,0.00048860506,0.00061819865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990472,0.00013352025,0.00020336572,0.00039490548,0.0000011905106,0.00021982224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019849707,0.0004225688,0.00038649718,0.00004907925,0.0006821602,0.00012609168,0.00037731518,0.000118877266,0.0058605648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010147724,0.00045375343,0.00015958086,0.00007747539,0.0007478002,0.0010837337,0.0010338997,0.00017516596,0.0022344093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044762626,0.00017492095,0.8521061,0.00002378953,0.000055562054,0.000011628155,0.0005421288,0.000021377391,0.1380035,0.0000030984495,0.0042374185,0.004775732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015922479,0.00017531741,0.9436975,0.000015919713,0.00007924915,0.00001030974,0.0061033084,0.00004022466,0.01649008,0.000040421033,0.031182578,0.00057280716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012407341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027370976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12151343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006344059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018967486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983054701","doi":"10.1002/edn3.56","title":"Using environmental DNA metabarcoding to map invasive and native invertebrates in two Great Lakes tributaries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Trillium Foundation","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Dreissena; Introduced species; Biology; Ecology; Tributary; Invertebrate; Endangered species; Invasive species; Taxon; Genus; DNA barcoding; Freshwater ecosystem; Habitat; Geography; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Mollusca; Bivalvia","score_opus":0.017289298577927686,"score_gpt":0.22493292482671318,"score_spread":0.2076436262487855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983054701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964664,0.00031467841,0.000018209783,0.00019340368,0.00020244092,0.0011034118,0.0002837887,0.000040415733,0.001377257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945758,0.00020629239,0.0033000195,0.000717278,0.000033287273,0.000037318896,0.00007339528,0.000051336356,0.0010052973],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665534,0.00017186246,0.000456816,0.0011802729,0.00072336785,0.0008123175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989365,0.00017051087,0.00015806379,0.0004223754,7.0254606e-7,0.0003118979],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028063447,0.0006161783,0.00056811504,0.00016396414,0.00037912664,0.0000705978,0.00041968172,0.00011280206,0.0050857114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025237397,0.0006385127,0.00012334167,0.00019608435,0.00094378745,0.00090100843,0.0019959747,0.00031179382,0.004088375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044974924,0.00013135506,0.6964541,0.000009992552,0.00004631821,0.000032323813,0.0019073538,0.00050360744,0.30029753,0.000016385891,0.00014544716,0.00041058802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023359132,0.00026162036,0.86822695,0.000070045346,0.00009091493,0.000035448516,0.0065959664,0.00055528735,0.117143564,0.0002683352,0.0032121246,0.0012038192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043938655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035595812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18315397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015730603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046697605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991401217","doi":"10.1002/edn3.59","title":"Detection of spatiotemporal variation in ranavirus distribution using eDNA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Bacteriophages and microbial interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ranavirus; Abiotic component; Ecology; Biology; Biotic component; Amphibian; Habitat; Population; Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Environmental health","score_opus":0.005613924612785615,"score_gpt":0.20239750394474695,"score_spread":0.19678357933196133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991401217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980485,0.000008164729,0.0009971708,0.000013388572,0.00020569912,0.00020461425,0.000045324698,0.000007903237,0.00046927106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957156,0.0000081309145,0.00016260882,0.000018648849,0.000015425368,0.0000031968646,0.00005255164,0.000008685661,0.00015916096],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932206,0.00003746344,0.00020756856,0.00018556062,0.000119390366,0.00012797819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997223,0.000010107934,0.000107678934,0.0001320305,5.772858e-7,0.000027320822],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009245087,0.00008601234,0.00009882243,0.000022829649,0.000035953526,0.000008689212,0.00006724342,0.000058591337,0.0027717517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000031737825,0.000092878814,0.00004528929,0.00008871426,0.000048418133,0.00031278806,0.00007006923,0.00008480681,0.00044132196],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023425751,0.00008935024,0.01919682,0.0000026543198,0.000003039696,6.479769e-7,0.00010813987,0.00054753595,0.97683614,0.000004074024,0.000004267522,0.0031839106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029947466,0.00004381416,0.8289886,0.000009067738,0.000006683297,0.00000480043,0.000039129627,0.0019055528,0.16719717,0.000018867731,0.0013977204,0.00008912812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016482526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015811394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8097918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046729133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002221889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99813986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991423413","doi":"10.1002/edn3.58","title":"Environmental DNA surveys help to identify winter hibernacula of a temperate freshwater turtle","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Overwintering; Temperate climate; Ecology; Turtle (robot); Environmental DNA; Latitude; Biology; Population; Biodiversity; Environmental science; Fishery; Geography","score_opus":0.008443424260243184,"score_gpt":0.2104905815264887,"score_spread":0.2020471572662455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991423413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99383247,0.00007975128,0.000048003683,0.00017865562,0.0004635997,0.0010288364,0.0008603957,0.000057032263,0.0034512552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900952,0.00009096865,0.0017623947,0.00068340765,0.000055710614,0.000040586547,0.00016255026,0.00008096912,0.007028195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958046,0.0002595115,0.0006569314,0.0012146835,0.0012028574,0.0008614045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837124,0.00006974295,0.00022756978,0.0009576334,0.000001254973,0.0003725507],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005835394,0.00064945157,0.000602074,0.00011111783,0.0002342691,0.000046901197,0.0008740295,0.00020160452,0.042950213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011417702,0.0006354535,0.00032310156,0.00016008836,0.0007587469,0.0005402344,0.0022930796,0.00029492058,0.047277816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032016454,0.00029177155,0.5239085,0.000008714288,0.00006429459,0.0000130321805,0.0005329283,0.00016081386,0.47149986,0.0000012560685,0.0028562865,0.00063053606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087106257,0.00031241952,0.8171872,0.000025907822,0.00004826222,0.000015469028,0.000776845,0.000021935077,0.16314782,0.000023133498,0.016928073,0.00064191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016529481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006412247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30835205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009929149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000266385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997071661","doi":"10.1002/edn3.66","title":"Specialized bacteriome uncovered in the coralloid roots of the epiphytic gymnosperm, <i>Zamia pseudoparasitica</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; Secretaria Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Botany; Gymnosperm; Cycad; Epiphyte; Cyanobacteria; Proteobacteria; 16S ribosomal RNA; Bacteria","score_opus":0.009298425427029723,"score_gpt":0.17914807719899878,"score_spread":0.16984965177196906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997071661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914853,0.000061486615,6.3148855e-7,0.0055895485,0.00009242044,0.0001871197,0.00006381233,0.00000788523,0.0025117707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963198,0.000029632545,0.000010898166,0.003391738,0.00014018246,0.0000073592278,0.000020828815,8.4376813e-7,0.00007872165],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990685,0.00017762599,0.00019695309,0.00019085885,0.00017935011,0.00018674265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996788,0.00011602587,0.000080196216,0.00007816465,0.0000015369582,0.000045294964],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000097144424,0.000114882765,0.00016381178,0.000002117683,0.0001037533,0.000013246785,0.00039700803,0.000057350408,0.001336921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016552505,0.000035720113,0.00011435061,0.00018697165,0.00030955562,0.00004854651,0.00009061261,0.00014483256,0.000060421098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055855202,0.0001258313,0.15722153,0.000002795879,0.000009939765,0.000007241792,0.00032130384,0.0000066159123,0.8372061,0.00023349885,0.00038779835,0.004421498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000221992,0.00016569957,0.98795235,0.000005549401,0.000012790576,0.0000063551624,0.00055739493,0.000018217197,0.0040173093,0.00026950712,0.006675275,0.00009757433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035376335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000404397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8331888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001553012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026009648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999816348","doi":"10.1002/edn3.65","title":"Analytical validation and field testing of a specific qPCR assay for environmental DNA detection of invasive European green crab (<i>Carcinus maenas</i>)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; South Australian Research and Development Institute; Australian Government","keywords":"Carcinus maenas; Environmental DNA; Biology; Shellfish; Fishery; Ecology; Aquatic animal; Zoology; Decapoda; Biodiversity; Crustacean; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.025731592816908767,"score_gpt":0.1947873361184552,"score_spread":0.16905574330154644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999816348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99595654,0.00010752258,0.00063829997,0.0002457688,0.000055726177,0.0006210926,0.00034687843,0.000027210555,0.0020009757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634546,0.00013939025,0.0029012936,0.00028427958,0.00006623282,0.000012785679,0.000062671315,0.00003683082,0.00015102701],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779814,0.00016091032,0.0005171454,0.0006764028,0.0005121417,0.00033524612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883765,0.00036965476,0.00031963832,0.0002686817,0.0000016075335,0.00020277567],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029862445,0.00032564238,0.00036906224,0.00004801115,0.00021288464,0.000015058774,0.00028769145,0.00009902836,0.00059904816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010434357,0.00034709304,0.00014859681,0.00012892495,0.00073535653,0.00027322664,0.0007671862,0.00017155014,0.0001777433],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008743488,0.00013870797,0.39826706,0.00003435667,0.00004324436,0.0000067771257,0.00055720966,0.0000673329,0.5880134,0.0000021721369,0.00020301812,0.01257927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087767513,0.0008498697,0.5120528,0.000018965333,0.000098379795,0.000009645092,0.0008181581,0.0003708999,0.48297536,0.000032449196,0.0015865926,0.00030924947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039177543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000046846503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11378569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023473993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018789627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000222237","doi":"10.1002/edn3.61","title":"A mesocosm comparison of laboratory‐based and on‐site eDNA solutions for detection and quantification of striped bass (<i>Morone saxatilis</i>) in marine ecosystems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Stantec (Canada); Dalhousie University","funders":"Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Genome Atlantic; Offshore Energy Research Association","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Bass (fish); Morone saxatilis; Mesocosm; Bay; Fishery; Biology; Serranidae; Environmental science; Marine ecosystem; Ecosystem; Biodiversity; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Oceanography","score_opus":0.024184808207269783,"score_gpt":0.22441560597240268,"score_spread":0.2002307977651329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000222237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979015,0.000107584216,0.0004878969,0.00021810747,0.000034919714,0.0006997023,0.000474249,0.00001279307,0.000063236315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836355,0.000058453963,0.0013797366,0.000074196505,0.000009405636,0.000037254744,0.00005482618,0.000012507214,0.000010086137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987097,0.000074877215,0.00036459044,0.00039259414,0.00025429984,0.00020393013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993939,0.00010718699,0.00024791117,0.0001602945,0.0000016006742,0.00008914476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019131009,0.00017443075,0.000301856,0.000044850225,0.00013741649,0.000006900075,0.0000943796,0.00007520545,0.00013833129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003182935,0.00018826968,0.00004240352,0.000121957666,0.00039679994,0.0001325241,0.0002358116,0.000093669034,0.000021925338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094480834,0.00019577087,0.5179676,0.000041627518,0.000011230224,3.1324169e-7,0.00045200452,0.0004788353,0.4794626,0.000005128728,0.000079154124,0.0012112855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011958242,0.00046200928,0.7791692,0.000015849932,0.000035178633,2.983992e-7,0.00073676556,0.0073356107,0.21015555,0.000010428696,0.00072217133,0.00016108692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015453598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002109091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26930705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018532271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019109439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7677415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004206018","doi":"10.1002/edn3.71","title":"Detection of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) using environmental DNA in riverine systems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Centres of Excellence","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Unionidae; Watershed; Sampling (signal processing); Habitat; Biology; Ecology; River ecosystem; Fishery; Environmental science; Bivalvia; Mollusca; Biodiversity; Engineering; Filter (signal processing)","score_opus":0.014001013372072187,"score_gpt":0.18223055129401672,"score_spread":0.16822953792194453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004206018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979245,0.0002179012,0.00017275615,0.00008087319,0.00018531443,0.00062058266,0.00027545955,0.00004349897,0.00047909308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99825287,0.00020157396,0.0010321784,0.00018904883,0.000060909093,0.000019022089,0.00005394523,0.000046186247,0.00014427962],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971946,0.00014027752,0.0005721531,0.0007964812,0.0007475232,0.00054899656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910724,0.000034120498,0.0002493138,0.00036310384,5.0883176e-7,0.0002457311],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017102642,0.00043762103,0.00045791842,0.0000786982,0.00021474781,0.00002223218,0.00042868764,0.00016783166,0.003105734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009848159,0.0004671762,0.0001553637,0.00020115793,0.00080766925,0.0005081145,0.0010401998,0.00027261418,0.0014279449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049901602,0.0002072789,0.37243316,0.000016622873,0.000028069537,0.000030212623,0.0010813177,0.0030816225,0.62238055,0.0000011646199,0.00006835438,0.0006217356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014313858,0.0003588746,0.7932733,0.000027552664,0.00006633172,0.000023760364,0.0028169276,0.0050447267,0.18912691,0.000014588316,0.007131283,0.0006843239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041534952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004379499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43325365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001035026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018896217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004894873","doi":"10.1002/edn3.73","title":"Groundtruthing of pelagic forage fish detected by hydroacoustics in a whale feeding area using environmental DNA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Parks Canada; Université Laval; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Capelin; Pelagic zone; Forage fish; Fishery; Clupea; Biology; Population; Smelt; Environmental DNA; Coregonus; Ecology; Herring; Biodiversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.01670915200184356,"score_gpt":0.1856449888036504,"score_spread":0.16893583680180685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004894873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99709344,0.00021348312,0.00033972907,0.00015956946,0.000115605675,0.0005941758,0.00060882577,0.000060814004,0.00081435085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963151,0.0002531697,0.0024742035,0.0005614514,0.000042178286,0.000014637185,0.00013995919,0.000070049144,0.0001292337],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963608,0.00011895839,0.00071429624,0.0010215631,0.0009812628,0.00080314244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882555,0.00010113443,0.00034919992,0.000382897,6.3791055e-7,0.0003406057],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021356081,0.0005907839,0.0005666632,0.000079686375,0.0003357177,0.00004177804,0.0006413407,0.00023237948,0.003212392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003730985,0.000680859,0.00020185938,0.0002714434,0.0009833687,0.00071030325,0.0014908313,0.0004646146,0.0003303167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005471295,0.00033074382,0.36325383,0.000020779717,0.000039858664,0.000049020087,0.0019476303,0.0017425247,0.63141596,5.955477e-7,0.0005211749,0.00062316534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042457646,0.0008450031,0.73156005,0.000115345276,0.0002978884,0.00006731875,0.012450728,0.026186608,0.21866713,0.000076698976,0.0031748011,0.002312669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000152244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018475235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41274884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014629381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033489137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009315083","doi":"10.1002/edn3.76","title":"Validating environmental DNA metabarcoding for marine fishes in diverse ecosystems using a public aquarium","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.049564339473255066,"score_gpt":0.2185644860824649,"score_spread":0.16900014660920984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009315083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957106,0.000095654905,0.00030720545,0.0005796539,0.0002197324,0.0012781385,0.00047840975,0.00008627832,0.0012443115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900099,0.000113665636,0.008465101,0.00065863115,0.00014719747,0.000080192716,0.00026286012,0.00007876873,0.00018365677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959899,0.00017222954,0.00070513797,0.0012869718,0.0008061989,0.0010395471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868757,0.00014250913,0.00030964406,0.00042176482,7.893589e-7,0.00043770898],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004012481,0.0006383553,0.0006079535,0.00009510673,0.0006187547,0.00009882594,0.0006997659,0.00018168839,0.006020252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006436743,0.00070636306,0.00030172287,0.00022713302,0.00058254873,0.0010142829,0.002531457,0.00033012815,0.0012375452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005700287,0.00030941973,0.76226014,0.000031437212,0.00007544056,0.000040326486,0.0013637425,0.0006284916,0.23258929,0.0000094477855,0.0006197714,0.0020154682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008026571,0.00097379286,0.7956206,0.000074363095,0.0004279253,0.00007197593,0.021477628,0.033974495,0.084183194,0.00020660073,0.05128011,0.0036827533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022170896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007577937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1484061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017809528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004522673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011266069","doi":"10.1002/edn3.82","title":"Revising the range of Rocky Mountain tailed frog, <i>Ascaphus montanus</i>, in British Columbia, Canada, using environmental DNA methods","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations; University of Victoria","keywords":"Tributary; Environmental DNA; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Extant taxon; Ecology; Wildlife; Flathead; Fishery; Biology; Cartography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.012767263232182365,"score_gpt":0.205294716204646,"score_spread":0.19252745297246365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011266069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99608266,0.0011921114,0.00011769142,0.00027831268,0.00014622418,0.0010146827,0.0005954838,0.00003019254,0.0005426185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99137807,0.0005198678,0.006082956,0.0015200598,0.000065041866,0.000031169693,0.000060310496,0.00006642928,0.00027611692],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956322,0.00050331326,0.0008520651,0.0010498464,0.0011333484,0.00082927477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985428,0.00017886466,0.0003950726,0.00056098064,0.000001044129,0.00032124636],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005119953,0.00045118798,0.00069927506,0.000027115868,0.0005924226,0.0000969632,0.0009086055,0.00017083855,0.0057278397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000499488,0.0005964975,0.00022648065,0.00029040422,0.0011487285,0.0004198903,0.0015611722,0.000495174,0.00014361038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028995528,0.00016308832,0.89997464,0.00001726467,0.0000643656,0.00011658811,0.0008535223,0.0009942591,0.09081472,2.3645653e-7,0.0021660463,0.0048062694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012864142,0.00012658903,0.97704226,0.00004758718,0.000098329016,0.000044582404,0.0043779174,0.0012225133,0.006131112,0.000021239477,0.008891065,0.00071037037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48668152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40325245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084683605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031526922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022128603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011674956","doi":"10.1002/edn3.81","title":"An analysis of metadata reporting in freshwater environmental DNA research calls for the development of best practice guidelines","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Rubric; Environmental DNA; Data science; Sampling (signal processing); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Scale (ratio); Information retrieval; Data mining; Biology; Ecology; Geography; World Wide Web; Biodiversity; Psychology; Cartography; Filter (signal processing)","score_opus":0.15242663817614255,"score_gpt":0.3693315223589147,"score_spread":0.21690488418277215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011674956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99627423,0.0002870168,0.0007425782,0.0009368345,0.000046077286,0.0009208035,0.00056939945,0.00001211171,0.00021095574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438501,0.00021058541,0.055017516,0.00036807955,0.00003278891,0.00007656703,0.00026316513,0.000031174717,0.00014999951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481696,0.00024923042,0.0020087035,0.0009095778,0.0014416721,0.0005738652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974531,0.0005158663,0.0010815071,0.0007495231,0.0000076895485,0.00019231328],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028553691,0.00033549778,0.0006287799,0.00014485444,0.00041006805,0.000031642667,0.0009643081,0.00012195791,0.0014523779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067506306,0.00027478792,0.00024475297,0.0005095599,0.0011371663,0.00079543516,0.001394313,0.00028438884,0.00013486945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020224795,0.0011820176,0.59090114,0.00002461022,0.0008185644,0.000016498272,0.007657484,0.006082618,0.38673466,0.0000063676594,0.00072764646,0.0056461357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009110329,0.0004948975,0.7663529,0.0000228183,0.001026458,0.000003806461,0.030711513,0.005552946,0.15720382,0.00001494448,0.037160084,0.000544769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036309293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040388264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22953083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000575844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000102647045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015290936","doi":"10.1002/edn3.83","title":"Validation of an environmental DNA protocol to detect a stream‐breeding amphibian, the Streamside Salamander (<i>Ambystoma barbouri</i>)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Salamander; Environmental DNA; Amphibian; Biology; Ecology; STREAMS; Zoology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.01454479359420164,"score_gpt":0.21745628883229115,"score_spread":0.20291149523808952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015290936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792224,0.000011864742,0.000091842645,0.0005149574,0.00006733162,0.017718442,0.00027260312,0.00009306157,0.002007492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991909,0.000013114295,0.0023394707,0.0012996003,0.00014593508,0.003968946,0.00007124916,0.000073935094,0.00017873614],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598753,0.00023265103,0.0006581649,0.0011265749,0.0012848027,0.000710245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983566,0.00008368495,0.00028773292,0.0007253478,0.0000012527679,0.000545402],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003087313,0.00062115444,0.00044858974,0.00005799509,0.0005545517,0.00006286888,0.0009704475,0.00016299343,0.0043766503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027715274,0.00053502334,0.0002285954,0.00022809862,0.00091061014,0.0006512117,0.0015622013,0.00031983346,0.0020569405],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002664183,0.0004204623,0.2863022,0.000022804314,0.0000812567,0.0000284531,0.0024124805,0.0011606627,0.6952607,0.0000035825346,0.0015571731,0.0124837775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015446431,0.0015362184,0.51055366,0.000024327908,0.00010112507,0.000018657769,0.002203318,0.00028138244,0.47767714,0.00005617952,0.0052532465,0.00075011386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006714615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016333175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22425143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006760698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040568825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025890805","doi":"10.1002/edn3.88","title":"Caged fish experiment and hydrodynamic bidimensional modeling highlight the importance to consider 2D dispersion in fluvial environmental DNA studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"GDG Environnement; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Salmo; Environmental science; Brown trout; Dispersion (optics); Fluvial; River ecosystem; Rainbow trout; Abundance (ecology); Hydrology (agriculture); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Ecology; Geology; Ecosystem; Biology; Biodiversity; Physics; Geomorphology; Structural basin","score_opus":0.021733064566484116,"score_gpt":0.22566563136600584,"score_spread":0.20393256679952174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025890805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99203473,0.0008958759,0.000019281588,0.0056024534,0.00015372765,0.00090213463,0.00014423559,0.00004844208,0.0001991104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99237055,0.0009961014,0.0008361208,0.0054077916,0.00006691909,0.00007426634,0.00005168182,0.00004536517,0.00015120002],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965798,0.00015959542,0.0005358043,0.001196844,0.00086497556,0.0006629496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898225,0.00012356586,0.0001226402,0.0004118671,7.19815e-7,0.0003589478],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002431671,0.0005648081,0.00046254598,0.000048862235,0.00066550006,0.000035730573,0.000411023,0.0001148214,0.0014065454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003389697,0.00047118307,0.00012714799,0.00014291656,0.0010175157,0.00036007693,0.002297067,0.00033974973,0.0010031407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002217493,0.0004425689,0.54348123,0.00001666355,0.00015132467,0.00016145385,0.014114864,0.013165184,0.42217377,0.000012021758,0.005401906,0.00065726327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045459815,0.0010030209,0.8665815,0.00009425304,0.00022325537,0.00007124019,0.035535797,0.028642993,0.049434647,0.0001851156,0.011016278,0.0026659055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005675432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006997089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3727391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001145235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030852764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031983174","doi":"10.1002/edn3.89","title":"60 specific eDNA qPCR assays to detect invasive, threatened, and exploited freshwater vertebrates and invertebrates in Eastern Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Environmental DNA; Biology; Invasive species; Invertebrate; Ecology; TaqMan; Endangered species; Fishery; Zoology; Habitat; Biodiversity; Polymerase chain reaction","score_opus":0.014958431988792932,"score_gpt":0.16986766416041296,"score_spread":0.15490923217162003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031983174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99689966,0.0004007553,0.000009220056,0.0014326137,0.000068517096,0.00047220822,0.00016842083,0.000029686607,0.00051889766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944789,0.0006550341,0.0013689941,0.003164096,0.000028947008,0.000028995946,0.000037939208,0.000033682067,0.00020340546],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977769,0.000079025915,0.00029541887,0.0008754777,0.00045642,0.0005167525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991779,0.00006607131,0.00006404097,0.00022902622,7.437073e-7,0.00046224223],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000081483915,0.0004096325,0.00033715533,0.00004551285,0.00021841221,0.00005450054,0.00028116014,0.00008875648,0.001783783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019757827,0.00040345723,0.00003533854,0.00016061845,0.00043787147,0.00034918834,0.0013184957,0.00019763083,0.00095033116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046261786,0.000032787484,0.8707755,0.0000107475735,0.000021467973,0.00012469468,0.0010454379,0.000087352135,0.119594306,6.5176647e-7,0.006977727,0.0012830672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009740447,0.00023797459,0.92906374,0.000023703804,0.000019551173,0.000011603358,0.002342555,0.00030294943,0.058627103,0.000054762597,0.007723166,0.00061886624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038385265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16664733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12826207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005072249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000051763295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036144229","doi":"10.1002/edn3.112","title":"Pathway to Increase Standards and Competency of eDNA Surveys (PISCeS)—Advancing collaboration and standardization efforts in the field of eDNA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Windsor; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Environmental DNA; Field (mathematics); Environmental resource management; Library science; Engineering; Ecology; Biology; Political science; Biodiversity; Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.004517643098230186,"score_gpt":0.21435245561259014,"score_spread":0.20983481251435995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036144229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99660987,0.00014331662,0.00055579754,0.00082720746,0.000028741599,0.000494542,0.00045069426,0.0000071980294,0.0008826293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974393,0.00024694484,0.0016851503,0.00056323875,0.000011105719,0.000008341045,0.00002394853,0.000008770016,0.000013147056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984019,0.0002147171,0.00029705142,0.00032176968,0.0005850102,0.00017956403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945045,0.00015717423,0.00012668314,0.00015925491,0.0000026194134,0.00010381376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006916763,0.00016398745,0.00023760107,0.000031933472,0.00011887999,0.000014390313,0.00014778004,0.000051819075,0.00023719123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012607142,0.00014241316,0.000026992631,0.00017374936,0.00031042524,0.00022223045,0.00040326995,0.00008933946,0.000007656231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008821759,0.000103282546,0.90640396,0.000038661023,0.000013586828,0.000007901975,0.005549432,0.0005530062,0.08222249,0.00003773009,0.0007003508,0.00428137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006617617,0.00061158446,0.9520172,0.000026101909,0.000020276886,0.000001984541,0.0030843809,0.00007303982,0.03927361,0.0000599561,0.0039829584,0.00018715944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021468203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022340279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04561321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016798095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064311876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.580744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042728572","doi":"10.1002/edn3.111","title":"Comparing environmental metabarcoding and trawling survey of demersal fish communities in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Trawling; Environmental DNA; Demersal zone; Demersal fish; Fishery; Biodiversity; Species richness; Water column; Bottom trawling; Whiting; Fishing; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Vulnerable species; Environmental science; Endangered species; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.040016027275902206,"score_gpt":0.1987654007028483,"score_spread":0.1587493734269461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042728572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979798,0.00022783615,0.000014406225,0.00016844572,0.000032990396,0.00027273677,0.0006170301,0.000006319992,0.0006804141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857736,0.00037750346,0.00036140953,0.0004976771,0.000008082909,0.000007003906,0.00014570392,0.000014818678,0.000010459871],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787503,0.00033584764,0.000471967,0.0003133593,0.00066845724,0.00033532968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991055,0.00030971537,0.00020830923,0.00027166386,5.567745e-7,0.00010425274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004634998,0.0002658011,0.00041749657,0.000026908816,0.00020718949,0.00001210811,0.00058193353,0.000053811367,0.00070258987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021023843,0.00024158393,0.000057570567,0.00013602285,0.0012375257,0.00020587018,0.0008575216,0.00026570668,0.000011226725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035214063,0.00011425581,0.9855043,0.000015867286,0.000036615016,0.0000068860527,0.0036056067,0.0005930617,0.009313107,0.00000371532,0.0003959015,0.0003754232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005310774,0.00009368984,0.98145056,0.000013625053,0.000036064917,0.0000038410894,0.012112798,0.0005360463,0.004201557,0.0000056705553,0.0007868724,0.00022819068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16197835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16304956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008507192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023985359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000053349536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043916054","doi":"10.1002/edn3.116","title":"Metabarcoding unsorted kick‐samples facilitates macroinvertebrate‐based biomonitoring with increased taxonomic resolution, while outperforming environmental DNA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Biomonitoring; Environmental DNA; Water quality; Biodiversity; Invertebrate; Taxon; Biology; Sass; Ecology; Taxonomic rank; Environmental science","score_opus":0.028017513719990825,"score_gpt":0.18931618870446262,"score_spread":0.1612986749844718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043916054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99578923,0.00025446233,0.00052841834,0.00042796228,0.00012874058,0.00091245846,0.000817419,0.00022708917,0.0009142266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886716,0.00015043805,0.009453766,0.00084021053,0.00010898448,0.00009164415,0.00042985997,0.00009470026,0.00015879956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954066,0.0001983238,0.0006599303,0.0015501156,0.0010714639,0.0011135141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825025,0.00013304982,0.0003146131,0.0006242727,0.0000014822328,0.00067634595],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002715686,0.00089156616,0.00063664257,0.000100010795,0.0011361409,0.00009894888,0.0007539896,0.00018468883,0.0058331853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028586684,0.0008673816,0.00025872557,0.0002788856,0.0015744196,0.0009395338,0.0010159272,0.00043580894,0.004412136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016872298,0.00026300276,0.6368831,0.000020381522,0.00012955723,0.000050209106,0.0007116563,0.0015306133,0.35845056,0.0000027279698,0.00084622606,0.00094323134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030280522,0.00071948464,0.74169356,0.000048219048,0.00027100104,0.00002409066,0.0046006795,0.0049077626,0.21966909,0.000011896165,0.02336024,0.0016659197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036755163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027673517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13878149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014434254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010013307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044345051","doi":"10.1002/edn3.120","title":"Development of an environmental DNA metabarcoding assay for aquatic vascular plant communities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; DNA barcoding; Biology; Taxon; Internal transcribed spacer; Genus; Invasive species; Biodiversity; Ecology; Ribosomal RNA; Gene; Genetics","score_opus":0.030751606812215056,"score_gpt":0.20304924084503667,"score_spread":0.1722976340328216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044345051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965811,0.00016077019,0.0010077388,0.00010421605,0.000092848255,0.0009007294,0.0005805345,0.00006782572,0.0005042319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492579,0.0001178429,0.049119383,0.0005153185,0.000047345864,0.00009131447,0.000706108,0.00006143628,0.00008333066],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969123,0.00018949997,0.0006821792,0.00065864134,0.0009284064,0.00062898675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867576,0.00014464647,0.00028797943,0.0005182247,5.737289e-7,0.00037283907],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004908483,0.0005373336,0.0005653807,0.000052432133,0.0007114526,0.000030826606,0.00081415067,0.00013758657,0.0027173345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017370616,0.00055818557,0.00025710234,0.00009122957,0.0009154371,0.0005429369,0.0011692797,0.0002332968,0.0008790693],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019301214,0.0013946074,0.22487777,0.000087059525,0.00049541204,0.000016949398,0.027735483,0.00062486355,0.72942126,0.000024692397,0.00074180047,0.014387116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003975239,0.0010575693,0.45031175,0.000056786477,0.0004817422,0.000016747765,0.040572125,0.0061084097,0.4090169,0.000094218514,0.08610823,0.0022002594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042081945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031918935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32040432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005772725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000055030746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080170233","doi":"10.1002/edn3.129","title":"Fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity shapes fluvial fish communities as revealed by eDNA metabarcoding","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Spatial ecology; Relative species abundance; Fluvial; Environmental science; Geography; Fishery; Biology; Structural basin","score_opus":0.016009825941255426,"score_gpt":0.19857204024598063,"score_spread":0.1825622143047252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080170233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99194306,0.0002821205,0.00003489993,0.0013827366,0.00013347236,0.0006587093,0.0014017036,0.00017004348,0.00399326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921706,0.0005333733,0.0011133297,0.0044958107,0.00012142238,0.0000588303,0.00050117157,0.00008515713,0.0009203447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960235,0.00029978206,0.00060423545,0.0009994269,0.0011388233,0.00093423354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984843,0.00011536932,0.00024548385,0.00053405954,6.83726e-7,0.0006201143],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022458269,0.0007749232,0.0006221291,0.000040182927,0.0010731833,0.000086196465,0.0010792421,0.00021156999,0.017484767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017276185,0.00083862926,0.00035992256,0.00014054161,0.0016853304,0.0007451137,0.0026503422,0.00056062045,0.009777876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000933838,0.00044295227,0.66954833,0.000012821312,0.00011536065,0.000029354005,0.0026454106,0.000103083235,0.29539153,0.0000015498258,0.029914755,0.001701485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023749033,0.0007978605,0.7177255,0.000023809249,0.00025312632,0.000050185303,0.006850299,0.0004103912,0.17124443,0.00004844399,0.0983188,0.0019022535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001885786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009998649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1241471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073875004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028496088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087942109","doi":"10.1002/edn3.135","title":"Using environmental DNA for biomonitoring of freshwater fish communities: Comparison with established gillnet surveys in a boreal hydroelectric impoundment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hydro-Québec; GDG Environnement; Université Laval","funders":"EnGlobe; Mitacs; Hydro-Québec","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Abundance (ecology); Relative species abundance; Fishery; Species richness; Ecology; Freshwater fish; Biology; Environmental science; Biodiversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.032603975861205746,"score_gpt":0.23401088864918906,"score_spread":0.2014069127879833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087942109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966531,0.00007681279,0.00054374145,0.00012711807,0.00008801248,0.00110062,0.0010745759,0.000041621803,0.00029443612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930538,0.00010865071,0.0059197387,0.00022862479,0.000052300515,0.0000640239,0.00045700753,0.000068334324,0.000047509657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996643,0.0003712401,0.00069376477,0.0006912413,0.0007942201,0.00080653705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987903,0.00016688125,0.00033077103,0.00044915813,0.0000011744706,0.00026171844],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050933985,0.0005616423,0.0006691121,0.000104399944,0.00036847248,0.0000441426,0.00064201705,0.00015444204,0.0009349426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009708488,0.0005537912,0.00015805774,0.00026365087,0.0010175011,0.0005235675,0.0008926725,0.000322432,0.0000798176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015003234,0.00065792503,0.8916076,0.000031491152,0.000079989884,0.000014078572,0.0040084203,0.0020425895,0.10003068,8.1995086e-7,0.000365938,0.0010104255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032666374,0.0013480664,0.87729347,0.000045301575,0.00011938078,0.0000114176155,0.008677079,0.0066523077,0.09910414,0.000016457281,0.0025476078,0.00091813266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015778617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000682301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014314143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001342102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000055057894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090589826","doi":"10.1002/edn3.139","title":"Hidden introductions of freshwater red algae via the aquarium trade exposed by DNA barcodes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan","keywords":"DNA barcoding; Biodiversity; Biology; Algae; Freshwater ecosystem; Ecology; Aquatic ecosystem; Fishery; Ecosystem; Geography","score_opus":0.010429782657077048,"score_gpt":0.17520579193400374,"score_spread":0.16477600927692668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090589826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839188,0.00022668294,0.00014490625,0.013052781,0.00020455316,0.000572085,0.00045144162,0.00006680315,0.001361981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962485,0.00016416506,0.0014817725,0.0012980171,0.0001281807,0.000027369346,0.000121119796,0.000035064997,0.00049581844],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768907,0.0001374451,0.0003976303,0.0006683333,0.00066319003,0.00044433065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909073,0.000058957496,0.00016375583,0.0004852518,5.115489e-7,0.00020077445],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013671115,0.00034814683,0.00029902038,0.000019946701,0.00041034573,0.000021370664,0.00067781005,0.00010408853,0.007037595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017016304,0.0002806571,0.00017460658,0.0001504461,0.0015026545,0.0002902679,0.00081800035,0.00026523028,0.001517152],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044765515,0.00022977973,0.07866966,0.000006744498,0.000072025054,0.0000039768242,0.002206156,0.000107966414,0.81119907,0.0000028455183,0.10621844,0.0012385715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009809938,0.00040037907,0.29022408,0.0000065644253,0.00012835117,0.000011583061,0.0024264802,0.00025055834,0.5745558,0.00010060609,0.13032801,0.0005865813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008421963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016489264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23664324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002667741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000013894215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093962070","doi":"10.1002/edn3.155","title":"Detecting community change in Arctic marine ecosystems using the temporal dynamics of environmental DNA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Churchill Northern Studies Centre; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"ArcticNet; Polar Knowledge Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biomonitoring; Ecology; Temporal scales; Abundance (ecology); Ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Arctic; Environmental change; Biology; Environmental science; Geography; Biodiversity; Climate change","score_opus":0.03387178436375033,"score_gpt":0.21414923576876435,"score_spread":0.18027745140501403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093962070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977971,0.000089034525,0.000030271083,0.0003792081,0.00011778714,0.0008369428,0.00026810693,0.000032734974,0.00044882024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981802,0.000100051315,0.0009091423,0.00052396196,0.000060831542,0.000030318715,0.00011116027,0.00004715011,0.00003717935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971517,0.0004858826,0.00059633265,0.0005230102,0.0006793567,0.00056374783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876016,0.00013781842,0.00034582676,0.0005662724,5.6265515e-7,0.00018937384],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004959165,0.00044234842,0.00044923593,0.000049660066,0.0005762981,0.000022870527,0.0008064486,0.00013918575,0.0032804282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027205533,0.00040433396,0.00017644842,0.00022315288,0.0010608605,0.00040339027,0.0028787863,0.0006935298,0.0003624381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046219433,0.0003305452,0.9507487,0.00003497189,0.00003701344,0.000018561343,0.0037706215,0.00028323501,0.042264953,0.0000024130013,0.000019817213,0.0024429625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008597688,0.00027877468,0.9737747,0.00003206274,0.00006149358,0.000024456376,0.008705389,0.009375624,0.0059203985,0.000042611584,0.00043690726,0.00048785523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042684483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001629471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036344554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001762337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021774272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094519479","doi":"10.1002/edn3.150","title":"Allometric scaling of eDNA production in stream‐dwelling brook trout (<i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i>) inferred from population size structure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; U.S. Geological Survey; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Allometry; Salvelinus; Trout; Biomass (ecology); STREAMS; Biology; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Scaling; Habitat; Relative species abundance; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009980586766796785,"score_gpt":0.18975658288940245,"score_spread":0.17977599612260567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094519479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982896,0.00023587521,0.000043382115,0.00024470297,0.00018180443,0.0005007253,0.00025193044,0.000045777248,0.00020620566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99376684,0.00013475186,0.0054457556,0.00022029161,0.00011172892,0.000007716216,0.00018430145,0.00003268871,0.000095948024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739164,0.00010453786,0.00057058997,0.00082308217,0.00072695344,0.00038317763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915266,0.00009588749,0.00029130152,0.0003041938,0.0000012949574,0.00015464873],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012135751,0.00035330732,0.00040916997,0.000075527,0.00014973345,0.000021075706,0.00033630859,0.00015205507,0.0017826844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012166935,0.00038086504,0.00012949419,0.00041302756,0.00029001117,0.0004659695,0.0005099121,0.00028595785,0.00020626682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006689238,0.00013291156,0.8001684,0.000011260572,0.000026703025,0.0000073651167,0.0011955878,0.006282356,0.1885017,5.78386e-7,0.00015979302,0.00344648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006894553,0.0000951553,0.9442748,0.000023742152,0.00005431781,0.0000018626797,0.00076095975,0.00040609034,0.052880947,0.0001134775,0.00034892187,0.00035028966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012069304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008635087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1441064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000594501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018722844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107492607","doi":"10.1002/edn3.164","title":"The need for robust qPCR‐based eDNA detection assays in environmental monitoring and species inventories","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Innovate BC","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Workflow; Biology; Biodiversity; Environmental monitoring; Environmental resource management; Transparency (behavior); Limiting; Risk analysis (engineering); Ecology; Computer science; Engineering; Business; Environmental science","score_opus":0.02277426875810653,"score_gpt":0.18755288401934733,"score_spread":0.1647786152612408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107492607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963399,0.00040515314,0.00040330266,0.0011005546,0.00026248477,0.00084098487,0.00011531351,0.00005300968,0.00047929832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687093,0.00047733594,0.0017434953,0.0002689155,0.00013758599,0.00010850848,0.000026819871,0.000038322447,0.00032805323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780494,0.00008850768,0.0003499776,0.000679761,0.00052025815,0.00055657537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991881,0.00020566516,0.0001360903,0.00025569537,4.7010377e-7,0.00021397322],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024028431,0.00037537818,0.00025504827,0.000032895114,0.0008490011,0.000078876845,0.00034231326,0.00011927569,0.00028493468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044854638,0.00033943204,0.00011538305,0.00011534756,0.0010798284,0.0003459927,0.0006203927,0.00025052647,0.0002357062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013897226,0.00011050104,0.8274787,0.000010890046,0.000025128496,0.0000071824084,0.0008587382,0.0011992361,0.16569477,0.000004054497,0.0003515078,0.004120334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013939047,0.00032225068,0.90159446,0.000011131541,0.000040938347,0.0000031489956,0.0046930425,0.0022215045,0.068287306,0.000052009975,0.02090197,0.0004783565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000346447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026243022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097407475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079816545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001924186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108093312","doi":"10.1002/edn3.165","title":"Linking bacterial diversity to floral identity in the bumble bee pollen basket","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Pollen; Pollinator; Operational taxonomic unit; Botany; Alpha diversity; Biodiversity; Ecology; Pollination; Bacteria; 16S ribosomal RNA","score_opus":0.0399915656031817,"score_gpt":0.19008646161472464,"score_spread":0.15009489601154294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108093312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960591,0.000028196742,4.2159118e-7,0.0031936043,0.000032502106,0.000102592814,0.00009706371,0.000011693601,0.00047481727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983325,0.000026176154,0.000010646147,0.0012556388,0.00031712954,0.000002355239,0.000023685578,3.002145e-7,0.000031563093],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943393,0.000036207974,0.000069618225,0.00015297944,0.00015948969,0.00014775166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99989575,0.00002905866,0.000016829224,0.000009245215,5.2072903e-7,0.00004861579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000081621016,0.00007089001,0.00008136469,0.0000023321463,0.00028508515,0.000035286947,0.00025227288,0.00002545357,0.00051655737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006108313,0.000026176407,0.000041013598,0.00008309359,0.000025656478,0.00011731038,0.0006831462,0.00006501664,0.00025495765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069709204,0.00006260688,0.30260718,0.0000017576374,0.000006149661,0.000019223904,0.0016341272,0.0000011492604,0.6887503,0.000024790215,0.0012088394,0.005614145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008130812,0.00011949506,0.987287,0.0000032689004,0.000003770172,7.5148296e-7,0.0009203222,0.0000032299906,0.00088490505,0.000058908106,0.01055667,0.00008039746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015950021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012872705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68786544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018698187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":4.066375e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5655941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111285500","doi":"10.1002/edn3.172","title":"Improved efficiency in eDNA metabarcoding of benthic metazoans by sieving sediments prior to DNA extraction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Benthic zone; Environmental DNA; Biology; Phylum; Taxon; Sediment; Ecology; Pelagic zone; Paleontology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.01253798665147007,"score_gpt":0.2169744131667935,"score_spread":0.20443642651532343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111285500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99671966,0.00024377255,0.00040897424,0.00063071377,0.0001287824,0.00078253914,0.00011656971,0.000041622705,0.0009273852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958386,0.00011903303,0.00301051,0.00070772687,0.000025377705,0.00003154933,0.00003160076,0.00003287277,0.00020275507],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971975,0.00011067434,0.00054945535,0.0008524157,0.0007281249,0.000561826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910474,0.000075917626,0.00021260955,0.00029867058,9.464052e-7,0.00030710123],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030162325,0.0003788197,0.00042497212,0.00006892166,0.00021049254,0.000025164121,0.00048757784,0.00010816369,0.0023784244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058166195,0.0004050934,0.0001503142,0.00032697854,0.00032878306,0.00057636935,0.00096728385,0.00027347755,0.0009272114],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040626834,0.00033743534,0.20397398,0.000013745269,0.000032027714,0.0000067640403,0.0015541301,0.00042897605,0.7907983,0.0000011261285,0.0004999808,0.0023129024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010670035,0.0004007012,0.4611688,0.000024876494,0.00008582297,0.0000028971197,0.0021233945,0.0008243384,0.52935004,0.00000612329,0.004382653,0.0005633386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012691121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012500487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26144823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065769005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025362021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111891248","doi":"10.1002/edn3.174","title":"Comparing CRISPR‐Cas and qPCR eDNA assays for the detection of Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i> L.)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; University of New Brunswick; Université Laval","funders":"Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Salmo; CRISPR; Biology; Computational biology; Environmental DNA; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Gene; Genetics; Ecology","score_opus":0.02010587619325833,"score_gpt":0.20494878434696523,"score_spread":0.1848429081537069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111891248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953638,0.00048099674,0.0019237739,0.0007328503,0.00011095976,0.0006927722,0.000050050407,0.000039875194,0.0006049358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981539,0.00038692172,0.000850051,0.00042265956,0.0000555323,0.000030439789,0.00001375192,0.000024886745,0.00006182508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998492,0.000049233255,0.00027896476,0.00048278735,0.0003804927,0.00031649836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930745,0.00016877789,0.00015296086,0.00023634399,7.6101344e-7,0.00013368666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017002842,0.00025353904,0.000269026,0.00001655715,0.00041612168,0.000022184417,0.00029518787,0.00007706707,0.00027959773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028017319,0.00021321066,0.000116149364,0.00008574956,0.0007304277,0.00017274196,0.0007119244,0.00016080884,0.00024371318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077195924,0.00007896168,0.7027131,0.000023562181,0.00005260317,0.0000027371925,0.0008325909,0.00021961278,0.29262736,0.0000068573086,0.00063465856,0.002730775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070293865,0.00027301372,0.9014385,0.000008388855,0.00012495834,0.0000086090195,0.0010068612,0.0019355332,0.08362907,0.000031394033,0.01057423,0.00026650354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017386621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029477582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20899828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018720375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":8.5241356e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8694479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112053409","doi":"10.1002/edn3.171","title":"Lateral and longitudinal fish environmental DNA distribution in dynamic riverine habitats","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Habitat; River ecosystem; Environmental science; Fish migration; Biology; Ecology; Freshwater fish; Snow; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Hydrology (agriculture); Fishery; Biodiversity; Geography; Geology","score_opus":0.008022807901971707,"score_gpt":0.18432948995684245,"score_spread":0.17630668205487074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112053409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99682873,0.00013934397,0.00003693369,0.0012012705,0.00008609676,0.00046630096,0.0008607167,0.000059073896,0.00032155038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99737334,0.0005407302,0.00044174885,0.00079369266,0.00003317318,0.000025147532,0.0005317499,0.000034756595,0.00022562937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972999,0.00008869358,0.00039453193,0.0010149905,0.0005677946,0.0006340771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992134,0.000041070667,0.0001229341,0.00027305845,2.8822635e-7,0.00034924762],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000117372736,0.00047679595,0.00036676042,0.000031814525,0.000295843,0.00004014684,0.00033309066,0.00014145098,0.0032349376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013065914,0.00052177435,0.00010977603,0.00012547972,0.001117553,0.0005539052,0.0014136946,0.00032789362,0.0018149065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078945384,0.00025179045,0.94823223,0.0000106740945,0.000027135395,0.0001144366,0.00071933283,0.00011770293,0.047289472,0.0000025644435,0.0010530273,0.0021026654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012344442,0.00027587326,0.9887156,0.0000111114205,0.000035102385,0.0000256415,0.00034807753,0.0007045101,0.0024990432,0.000035483365,0.0055670454,0.0005480716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058206733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005281795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044790428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010224537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000014567248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137682792","doi":"10.1002/edn3.189","title":"A validation scale to determine the readiness of environmental DNA assays for routine species monitoring","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":221,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; European Cooperation in Science and Technology","keywords":"Environmental DNA; In silico; Scale (ratio); Sampling (signal processing); Computational biology; Data mining; Computer science; Biology; Ecology; Cartography; Genetics; Geography; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.019120461583121834,"score_gpt":0.21323408972070879,"score_spread":0.19411362813758695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137682792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99590456,0.00011603914,0.00028716453,0.0004884316,0.00033313682,0.00076084037,0.00057334005,0.000031466858,0.0015049974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98896176,0.00017829571,0.0061770766,0.00017513444,0.0001454794,0.000101315556,0.00012214227,0.00004304774,0.0040957513],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739486,0.000102989354,0.0004742465,0.00074205647,0.0007551955,0.0005306574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987861,0.00018171934,0.00019865631,0.0006566552,0.0000020590721,0.0001747984],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030737097,0.00038481984,0.00036557257,0.000042148524,0.000507527,0.000038714887,0.0005067786,0.00010686811,0.0025867058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043419637,0.00034411077,0.0002244219,0.0001688823,0.00065332116,0.00028942522,0.0012207022,0.0001461154,0.00069299765],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003720341,0.0002621961,0.41853958,0.000008863745,0.00003578221,0.000006740353,0.00073347037,0.00021127814,0.576505,0.000003322802,0.0005121892,0.003144343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042727246,0.00011080195,0.5289682,0.000014943673,0.00006152792,0.00001180635,0.0015688712,0.000022736253,0.46262905,0.000029227744,0.005905357,0.0002501973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024714607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009711768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113875955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007356812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000032166897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165660295","doi":"10.1002/edn3.198","title":"Prolonged impacts of past agriculture and ungulate overabundance on soil fungal communities in restored forests","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Welfare Foundation; Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology; Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province","keywords":"Reforestation; Species richness; Ecology; Biodiversity; Community structure; Forest restoration; Vegetation (pathology); Ungulate; Afforestation; Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Ecological succession; Geography; Forest ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.006970313961579137,"score_gpt":0.18094340736123665,"score_spread":0.17397309339965752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165660295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975785,0.00052506913,7.088503e-8,0.00030215358,0.00005223465,0.00008614316,0.00064613833,0.000008355363,0.0008013276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981529,0.0005139588,0.0000074333284,0.0001191152,0.00005369376,0.0000061303167,0.00085641,7.8517536e-7,0.000289558],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999418,0.00008612829,0.00011901681,0.00012074951,0.00011273697,0.00014334514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995312,0.00031418286,0.000051974646,0.00004754232,0.0000031663665,0.00005191626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000055306526,0.00009868189,0.00012231454,0.000007786686,0.00008372775,0.000018490337,0.000067507055,0.000060824823,0.0007481407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011587928,0.000042281794,0.000037113095,0.00006827557,0.000020230558,0.000081227205,0.000052329746,0.00014324962,0.000027368875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007246905,0.0001412242,0.48099807,0.0000059931594,0.000007798539,0.00002025565,0.00029905196,0.00003744555,0.51605356,0.0000668148,0.0011241842,0.0011731646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008744626,0.00018296076,0.9683292,0.00007469847,0.000004974561,0.00003628821,0.0008564121,0.000026179558,0.02453186,0.00006333444,0.0057006045,0.00010604386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041047242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004377728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4915217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026694894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000018326435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8191616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166490348","doi":"10.1002/edn3.220","title":"A statistical model for calibration and computation of detection and quantification limits for low copy number environmental DNA samples","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Sample (material); Calibration; Statistical model; Statistics; Computer science; Data mining; Biology; Mathematics; Ecology; Biodiversity; Chromatography","score_opus":0.025752393694559776,"score_gpt":0.2415516179943898,"score_spread":0.21579922429983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166490348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79374343,0.00007337402,0.20435308,0.00007145655,0.00005143334,0.00062913325,0.0010358621,0.000015986156,0.000026236356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631985,0.00024989396,0.035673894,0.00008776511,0.000018508674,0.00008783796,0.00052040693,0.000025517613,0.00013770725],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984771,0.00005450939,0.00033067985,0.00060730206,0.00028292165,0.0002475001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938405,0.00019255132,0.00016070127,0.00015379358,0.0000017788468,0.000107139655],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014688629,0.00022940036,0.0002429924,0.000023034858,0.00033565552,0.00003001661,0.00006913424,0.000112225905,0.0001547686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031901243,0.00025993533,0.00006267787,0.000040016268,0.0006083581,0.00030954057,0.00017312137,0.00006736119,0.000020763853],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016913621,0.000397455,0.22914214,0.000085578875,0.000053081953,0.0000013405836,0.00083641574,0.002354451,0.753992,0.00010439957,0.00026486148,0.012599139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016514166,0.00023349133,0.5394368,0.00001942492,0.0001428759,0.000018721508,0.0009878423,0.19620651,0.25918722,0.001402157,0.00027862168,0.00043486594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001604666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024219227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49480477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023416172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030042431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168150887","doi":"10.1002/edn3.221","title":"Fish community shifts along a strong fluvial environmental gradient revealed by eDNA metabarcoding","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Estuary; Fluvial; Biodiversity; Ecology; Brackish water; Habitat; Fish migration; Geography; Coastal fish; River ecosystem; Community structure; Marine habitats; Fishery; Biology; Coral reef fish; Salinity","score_opus":0.014247321176009842,"score_gpt":0.19945249073966326,"score_spread":0.1852051695636534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168150887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99180233,0.00045820395,0.0000692398,0.00037760523,0.00036781695,0.0005377653,0.001252133,0.00012155158,0.005013357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99212754,0.0005916829,0.0019223726,0.0010840682,0.00008274954,0.0000601885,0.0010156606,0.00008554965,0.00303017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949191,0.0007502965,0.0007040206,0.0011693035,0.0012837768,0.001173462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978759,0.00019595916,0.00026981215,0.0011404486,0.0000011845415,0.00051666243],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005523923,0.00078810024,0.00063614163,0.000058274283,0.0018167903,0.00009889917,0.00088014896,0.00023265627,0.010553297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043376633,0.00089123636,0.0003941623,0.00020255463,0.0014606941,0.0006129545,0.003126359,0.0009959668,0.0030920936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049065427,0.0016161455,0.650102,0.00001544209,0.00019654544,0.00015370372,0.001987278,0.00009734747,0.32772455,0.000008336026,0.014225315,0.0038242722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018524433,0.00022952711,0.8795098,0.000029141995,0.00020117966,0.00007442119,0.0050624944,0.00006743498,0.068044715,0.00009094481,0.04362372,0.0012141716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003282912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014179255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25967982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019327624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000053229296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175518271","doi":"10.1002/edn3.224","title":"Proper environmental DNA metabarcoding data transformation reveals temporal stability of fish communities in a dendritic river system","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université Laval","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Tributary; Habitat; Relative species abundance; Sampling (signal processing); Biology; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.039688581736051394,"score_gpt":0.21753323887513418,"score_spread":0.1778446571390828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175518271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946707,0.0002334902,0.000058790607,0.00012471771,0.00012535554,0.0006979726,0.0020953917,0.000044419998,0.0019491785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957123,0.0003366942,0.0020977382,0.00017921274,0.000019624871,0.000036514964,0.0014238837,0.00003584572,0.00015820439],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632674,0.000540038,0.000858806,0.00074782525,0.00093612354,0.00059047213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811953,0.00012573946,0.0002336087,0.0013607285,0.0000015155025,0.0001588561],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075251074,0.00044072472,0.00058879185,0.000072392184,0.00034766019,0.00003357689,0.0009086005,0.0001522244,0.0044097607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019545632,0.0004645695,0.00015119708,0.00017879152,0.0015689619,0.0013059293,0.002174159,0.00035134918,0.00044644868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004383246,0.00074280886,0.8899031,0.00012543201,0.00006920861,0.000054292246,0.0054671834,0.00006220348,0.10205922,0.000014115377,0.00027891088,0.001179664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013859884,0.000105359264,0.8989091,0.00013010747,0.0001294844,0.00005739317,0.036045115,0.0005429352,0.058905512,0.000027471455,0.0031301058,0.0006314533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057679013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005576973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043153707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014224751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070868628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185211517","doi":"10.1002/edn3.239","title":"Community eDNA metabarcoding as a detection tool for documenting freshwater mussel (Unionidae) species assemblages","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biology; Species richness; Unionidae; Ecology; Habitat; Mussel; Introduced species; Invasive species; Quadrat; Biodiversity; Bivalvia; Mollusca","score_opus":0.016295879241671488,"score_gpt":0.21752869538214478,"score_spread":0.20123281614047328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185211517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946042,0.00011621098,0.00036755114,0.00028605264,0.00029120393,0.00048157584,0.00012768831,0.00009299486,0.0036325324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837223,0.0001932654,0.0057544955,0.00058117666,0.00008130859,0.00008079721,0.0001971477,0.000043860808,0.00934561],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757695,0.00026437157,0.00035519837,0.0006112023,0.00057638885,0.00061587093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989222,0.00022441108,0.00015398192,0.0005670101,0.0000024881972,0.00012986857],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049945846,0.0003904418,0.00033393962,0.00004938588,0.0017153701,0.00012283401,0.00039170333,0.00012989045,0.0064253616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105296785,0.00041430973,0.0002653657,0.00014647053,0.0004112413,0.0006781035,0.0014963133,0.00037278899,0.0016104254],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031451953,0.00039373868,0.23799354,0.000025204736,0.00011550048,0.000024827876,0.0013737214,0.000083814804,0.7531016,0.000025019679,0.0019077,0.004923875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006502418,0.000118124,0.545463,0.000015857091,0.00009965416,0.000028941067,0.0040988754,0.000049106497,0.3912265,0.00030116233,0.057471458,0.00047706344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002991944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033204007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36187512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081088016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000022969678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187900929","doi":"10.1002/edn3.245","title":"DNA metabarcoding marker choice skews perception of marine eukaryotic biodiversity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia; United States Agency for International Development; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Phylum; Biology; Biodiversity; Taxonomic rank; DNA barcoding; Evolutionary biology; 18S ribosomal RNA; Ecology; Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I; Environmental DNA; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Phylogenetics; Phylogenetic tree; Genetics; Gene; Taxon","score_opus":0.012922717560849579,"score_gpt":0.1976457125751617,"score_spread":0.1847229950143121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187900929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99090445,0.00008834835,0.00003261489,0.00024315127,0.00019672814,0.00023161758,0.00015787929,0.000042583724,0.008102615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99034953,0.00042320462,0.005565004,0.000362774,0.000034688797,0.0000069524594,0.0001792575,0.000018082865,0.0030604887],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760413,0.00014740671,0.0003502191,0.00073340384,0.0007082539,0.00045656617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990573,0.00008236407,0.00017198594,0.0005102027,0.0000021798362,0.00017594997],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020183413,0.0003409585,0.00036153352,0.00005054783,0.00036655657,0.000020678715,0.00036062027,0.00011915112,0.03762615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003670501,0.00037015352,0.00024194906,0.00019902959,0.0007957425,0.00042336935,0.0022960096,0.00020646813,0.0044687516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017878161,0.00031227074,0.816725,0.000013179543,0.000063018786,0.000033274784,0.00036075912,0.00004150783,0.17704082,0.0000019056297,0.001648974,0.003741377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006081077,0.000066946894,0.9629072,0.000009246157,0.00012238695,0.000019095023,0.001227,0.00002471601,0.024891382,0.000028883893,0.009728238,0.0003668098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028824844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047543697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15214942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008711441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000434318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193846102","doi":"10.1002/edn3.233","title":"Environmental DNA as a detection and quantitative tool for stream‐dwelling salamanders: A comparison with the traditional active search method","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval","funders":"Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Salamander; Environmental DNA; Biology; Ecology; Taxon; STREAMS; Caudata; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.03537685282525588,"score_gpt":0.2620535977204875,"score_spread":0.2266767448952316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193846102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904685,0.00019949385,0.0066923182,0.0005225145,0.00006455946,0.00088713237,0.0003986991,0.000033746688,0.0007330278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824778,0.00016433357,0.016159296,0.0003444538,0.00004510983,0.0001361093,0.00014714795,0.000041177584,0.00048461655],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972991,0.0002451646,0.0002716065,0.00091169926,0.000763891,0.0005085893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988593,0.0005435423,0.00014271312,0.00030728875,0.0000017649465,0.00014537718],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029051307,0.00040874365,0.00033131574,0.0000377718,0.0010810487,0.000074365744,0.00022679433,0.000119596756,0.0015721021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015892234,0.00033711645,0.00014022678,0.000115114024,0.0011982481,0.0004381482,0.00042335366,0.0003275986,0.0003376713],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014250022,0.002006811,0.22368658,0.000045741752,0.0008599089,0.00009025644,0.016890144,0.004699956,0.7055948,0.000205003,0.0008480494,0.043647766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021268006,0.0011962581,0.7102535,0.000022892154,0.00025215623,0.0001304148,0.032772366,0.0024824883,0.24537435,0.00028296997,0.0043713897,0.0007344391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005196189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000736654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4865669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075626536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006456873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207772534","doi":"10.1002/edn3.254","title":"Distribution of the boreal chorus frog (<i>Pseudacris maculata</i>) in an urban environment using environmental DNA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Sherbrooke; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Boreal; Environmental DNA; Ecology; Wetland; Range (aeronautics); Local extinction; Taiga; Geography; Habitat; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biology; Physical geography; Biological dispersal; Biodiversity; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.011014033941895308,"score_gpt":0.19785492587927825,"score_spread":0.18684089193738293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207772534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99665755,0.00040532145,0.000054616736,0.000119547585,0.0002371736,0.0006258875,0.0012439784,0.00002966033,0.00062629324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693763,0.00040301526,0.001244843,0.00021229692,0.00006676571,0.000029700032,0.000678589,0.000060226932,0.00036693024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953949,0.00039159204,0.00078191835,0.0012515549,0.0013053934,0.0008746768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805415,0.00005194284,0.0003486842,0.0012634848,0.000001079391,0.00028065522],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002957032,0.00063768844,0.0005396948,0.000046605062,0.00051598874,0.00003947267,0.0008208263,0.00025910317,0.0037452637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016078713,0.0006024632,0.00033702946,0.00024511147,0.0017091085,0.00063879194,0.002288295,0.0004616283,0.00056302454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037566115,0.0010158212,0.7653567,0.0000073105116,0.000038903185,0.00004361459,0.0005432451,0.0012147458,0.23053943,0.000009110108,0.00036109338,0.00083244103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001078999,0.000114199065,0.8952744,0.000024797413,0.00010414126,0.000042620497,0.0011597796,0.00043076096,0.096855745,0.00007190418,0.004256068,0.0005866049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026934108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004809943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13368367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002577145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009950936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212762999","doi":"10.1002/edn3.264","title":"eDNA metabarcoding as a means to assess distribution of subterranean fish communities: Iranian blind cave fishes as a case study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund; Shahrekord University; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mohammed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cave; Biology; Environmental DNA; Habitat; Ecology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.05377462174616674,"score_gpt":0.26386844191237124,"score_spread":0.2100938201662045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212762999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99561244,0.00003658099,0.000054232212,0.00023668958,0.00015181175,0.0008499543,0.000537685,0.000045306893,0.002475297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973581,0.00008148633,0.00078120886,0.00055562763,0.00003051851,0.000054387805,0.00023387658,0.000037074675,0.0008677639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695015,0.00038697518,0.0005210711,0.0006662871,0.0009198542,0.0005556674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985237,0.0001710257,0.00017729583,0.0008142806,0.000004301439,0.0003093881],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036957316,0.00045311695,0.0005048161,0.000054632656,0.0007315508,0.000067501,0.0004964302,0.00011043075,0.0051631564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052360287,0.00049912964,0.00020452577,0.00028929894,0.0006216539,0.0004088643,0.0018878076,0.00031259612,0.0009008582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097670105,0.002105442,0.95088005,0.000019993595,0.0002384827,0.0030115102,0.023057662,0.00028036718,0.01797328,0.000006126072,0.00096434116,0.0013650727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020965536,0.0009134281,0.7077618,0.00004316981,0.00032001312,0.0012971559,0.24924693,0.00004609429,0.032320898,0.000038765138,0.005104356,0.0008108069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004186336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018678044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24311823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008455487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006718599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215497431","doi":"10.1002/edn3.404","title":"Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> survey of the Winter Salmonosphere in the Gulf of Alaska","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tula Foundation; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Pacific Salmon Foundation; Mitacs","keywords":"Predation; Fishery; Marine ecosystem; Oceanography; Ecosystem; Apex predator; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Geology","score_opus":0.014057239710881114,"score_gpt":0.19934803329078435,"score_spread":0.18529079357990325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215497431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99554867,0.00013001813,0.0000027767092,0.00013179028,0.00020227973,0.0006652693,0.0005613418,0.000022655131,0.0027351745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772406,0.00031166954,0.00012714411,0.00023809748,0.00001560924,0.000031534404,0.00008328635,0.000035884696,0.0014327397],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965429,0.00046874137,0.0006106934,0.00061595056,0.001157736,0.0006039885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810594,0.00056269707,0.00032806498,0.0009197395,7.667568e-7,0.00008276349],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008689633,0.0004014816,0.0003992524,0.000051700477,0.0002511177,0.000015045528,0.0014341512,0.00015147279,0.0013607813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007102106,0.0002840842,0.00024746417,0.0004917973,0.0020841581,0.00023115907,0.0019326184,0.0003291684,0.0019575087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000119583365,0.00038247075,0.951904,0.000008894116,0.000040473788,0.000010057218,0.0024689415,0.0005099696,0.035272956,0.0000018788447,0.008801427,0.00058696134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055029057,0.00012172012,0.9728838,0.000019541461,0.00003324683,0.0000071595427,0.004585494,0.000038147085,0.019124944,0.00005382675,0.0024410172,0.00014081324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034685296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015459339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020979788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003943428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034518907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216467410","doi":"10.1002/edn3.261","title":"Targeted next‐generation sequencing of environmental DNA improves detection of invasive European green crab ( <i>Carcinus maenas</i> )","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Carcinus maenas; Environmental DNA; Biology; DNA sequencing; Fishery; Ecology; Biodiversity; Crustacean; DNA; Decapoda; Genetics","score_opus":0.018837274312241196,"score_gpt":0.17531825306284055,"score_spread":0.15648097875059935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216467410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959508,0.0004767453,0.00010341115,0.000051520507,0.00023341249,0.000402369,0.00046360894,0.000038363065,0.0022797608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635166,0.00057991856,0.0015443343,0.0002419632,0.000088947534,0.000013813372,0.0002784118,0.00005972926,0.00084123586],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668473,0.00033708123,0.0007217309,0.000889016,0.00086867507,0.00049877097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986139,0.000073242605,0.00048209875,0.0006428281,0.0000029965283,0.00018496663],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002835082,0.0004706255,0.00046291936,0.0000753803,0.0003322144,0.000023615514,0.00040380433,0.0001443533,0.002364796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029323435,0.0005204456,0.0002722312,0.00019580485,0.0010700357,0.0006238041,0.0012100483,0.00025009844,0.0006455611],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002890672,0.00029848955,0.05184436,0.00002719626,0.00008881431,0.00005946002,0.0011515523,0.0002088229,0.9396279,0.0000019301028,0.000110950234,0.006551621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005398241,0.00019987176,0.3447286,0.000016006978,0.00008024302,0.00002696877,0.001877019,0.00006211915,0.65168524,0.000029865607,0.0004297546,0.00032450008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002494357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012961563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29288423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011083998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009376928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217457303","doi":"10.1002/edn3.266","title":"Effect of biotic and abiotic factors on the production and degradation of fish environmental DNA: An experimental evaluation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Abiotic component; Perch; Ecology; Biotic component; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Environmental science; Fishery; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.015162862369210686,"score_gpt":0.2235679632135156,"score_spread":0.2084051008443049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217457303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985649,0.00021348422,9.713327e-7,0.00014736709,0.00012159699,0.00070210214,0.00009460186,0.0000116621095,0.00014333507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936694,0.00017957098,0.00010763096,0.00006941946,0.000016656644,0.000017683833,0.00010569384,0.000019562385,0.000116817064],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766475,0.0004349194,0.00029698334,0.0006198636,0.00076032145,0.00022317242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913645,0.00018166448,0.00020028878,0.0003858612,0.0000011142938,0.000094651776],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004914112,0.00030255446,0.0002740184,0.000038506743,0.00028713493,0.000016975804,0.00014093722,0.00009264848,0.0013065045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000769426,0.00023899719,0.000072063056,0.00008124715,0.001229268,0.0003318195,0.00038755784,0.00012707082,0.000034203913],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004844551,0.00034034878,0.39460906,0.000013360124,0.000033238994,0.0000015103003,0.00092975516,0.000053405256,0.6017224,0.000004031938,0.000076104916,0.0021683343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002639434,0.0006189218,0.46629155,0.000016558608,0.00007838808,0.0000072560724,0.0012541162,0.00009967158,0.53120077,0.0000072069843,0.00003065298,0.00013098151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028111344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009205673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071682476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037567245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021632368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210822164","doi":"10.1002/edn3.283","title":"Tracking the prevalence of a fungal pathogen, <i>Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis</i> (chytrid fungus), using environmental DNA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Chytridiomycosis; Zoospore; Chytridiomycota; Biology; Abiotic component; Environmental DNA; Amphibian; Ecology; Biotic component; Fungus; Environment variable; Spore; Biodiversity; Microbiology; Botany","score_opus":0.01359116544856872,"score_gpt":0.19508871596341412,"score_spread":0.1814975505148454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210822164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936266,0.0015089646,0.00006180512,0.00010971078,0.00043667873,0.0009937504,0.0023386942,0.0000568906,0.00086688966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647707,0.00047935,0.0010163697,0.00042129058,0.00008447893,0.0000968056,0.00008124826,0.00007668019,0.0012667101],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948131,0.00046563326,0.0007696211,0.0011367569,0.0018927966,0.000922132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980683,0.00016205531,0.00055973744,0.0009930916,0.0000010843862,0.00021576048],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071628124,0.00062865956,0.00046833657,0.00008166732,0.0018865874,0.00003616005,0.0014035105,0.00011232781,0.017496457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001941157,0.00059751637,0.00040220504,0.0002933526,0.0016984714,0.0005218532,0.0035303165,0.00067125977,0.00056523015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076852855,0.00061177363,0.55073607,0.00003137723,0.00006795554,0.00005326872,0.0011835913,0.0027849493,0.44256222,0.0000049620517,0.00065703894,0.0012299382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001161312,0.00046072027,0.9277244,0.000017798611,0.00033995372,0.0002836703,0.0033694687,0.0004782335,0.053074166,0.0000660999,0.012098923,0.0009252361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000081263046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000608893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38948807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019001802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008795585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213006239","doi":"10.1002/edn3.286","title":"Environmental DNA detection and abundance estimates comparable to conventional methods for three freshwater larval species at a power plant discharge","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Electric Power Research Institute","keywords":"Alewife; Dorosoma; Gizzard shad; Netting; Environmental DNA; Biology; Fishery; Ichthyoplankton; Abundance (ecology); Perch; Ecology; Relative species abundance; Sampling (signal processing); Biodiversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.015988489405540013,"score_gpt":0.23352606345856033,"score_spread":0.21753757405302032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213006239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920867,0.0002875138,0.0016878666,0.0002901889,0.00038596703,0.0013068522,0.0034465902,0.0000620676,0.0004462254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97145444,0.000048185797,0.024377113,0.00054987654,0.00004169743,0.00048381512,0.0003665531,0.000057270085,0.0026210411],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710655,0.00013037438,0.00038420004,0.0010125105,0.0006656268,0.00070070964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905014,0.00018781947,0.00015930683,0.00036649822,5.6531206e-7,0.00023567575],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043122796,0.00047209236,0.0003932254,0.000071238865,0.001955998,0.000049100512,0.00040910355,0.00007528179,0.01924345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012983158,0.00049601705,0.00018379281,0.00008234128,0.00078885356,0.0003078118,0.0028560904,0.00023048442,0.00095342577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033223367,0.00045014208,0.39740837,0.0000104336295,0.00009968529,0.00001002195,0.0007617615,0.0005406392,0.59434134,0.00001919046,0.0044367183,0.0015894697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011994384,0.0005881629,0.6914919,0.0000058912237,0.000072039344,0.00007195134,0.0007285391,0.0011026748,0.057910707,0.00023120698,0.24594605,0.00065142073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004440858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013286679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53643066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017608195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017126943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213257118","doi":"10.1002/edn3.289","title":"Effects of temperature and oxygen on cyanobacterial DNA preservation in sediments: A comparison study of major taxa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anoxic waters; Cyanobacteria; Biology; Sediment; Microcystis; Population; Ecology; Environmental chemistry; Botany; Environmental science; Chemistry; Paleontology; Bacteria","score_opus":0.0064698694916649375,"score_gpt":0.19781674862153512,"score_spread":0.19134687912987017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213257118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983562,0.000047508813,3.7720127e-7,0.000045523153,0.00012789319,0.0011541207,0.000093338764,0.0000100144725,0.0001650001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951017,0.000022383927,0.00008745537,0.0000705418,0.000011511955,0.000094207266,0.000035014287,0.000015624772,0.00015310067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980181,0.00023053364,0.0003640528,0.00045863717,0.0007045602,0.00022413676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993833,0.000081695056,0.00023081999,0.00024661532,4.995437e-7,0.000057105764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018110365,0.00022318037,0.00033440263,0.00007197728,0.00020207312,0.0000070622777,0.0002755098,0.000051926807,0.00086210197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012331208,0.00023418842,0.000044855347,0.00014824526,0.00025310623,0.00019349511,0.0012798564,0.00020643887,0.000029285273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019381476,0.0025876989,0.59640163,0.000017988412,0.000035005196,0.00000850819,0.0030262896,0.00043891283,0.39700022,0.0000015178788,0.0001444936,0.0001439152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025836893,0.0018105158,0.9079771,0.000011064741,0.00003995993,0.000001194891,0.003731652,0.000025055186,0.08322423,0.000011519812,0.00040231476,0.00018168768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034389706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000334328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.313776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044566186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000012160142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9549927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220882444","doi":"10.1002/edn3.291","title":"Developmental microbiome of the small carpenter bee, <i>Ceratina calcarata</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Microbiome; Zoology; Larva; Pollen; Pupa; Ecology; Brood; Taxon; Honey bee; Botany","score_opus":0.017771312336683286,"score_gpt":0.14318399447806096,"score_spread":0.12541268214137768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220882444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978146,0.00014415315,4.575427e-8,0.00026542475,0.000040559113,0.00011682153,0.000497272,0.000008197879,0.0011129327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983175,0.000015100561,0.000018833178,0.00029933066,0.000031954747,0.000017167382,0.000035496163,6.3808125e-7,0.0012640116],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994105,0.000046933153,0.00011661125,0.00014815605,0.00013461967,0.00014314166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998937,0.000024798035,0.000047740687,0.000011030389,8.2374714e-7,0.000021885799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000060089464,0.00008636742,0.00008860921,0.0000029159207,0.0004387329,0.0000072812027,0.0002291439,0.000014066782,0.0008618667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000014552284,0.000030662402,0.00007752677,0.00007167771,0.00007623288,0.000020760883,0.00051532255,0.00007724382,0.000024575997],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010722982,0.000072004965,0.055052936,8.73522e-7,0.000009478513,0.0000019166794,0.00008732124,8.088771e-7,0.9417537,0.000005049938,0.0014182257,0.0015869634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001028848,0.00010911692,0.8272317,0.0000029783835,0.0000065449676,0.00002931046,0.0009782094,0.00000139464,0.08089648,0.000010372472,0.09051709,0.000113919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006723692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018667136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8608572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059268295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000019053224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9436836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224255589","doi":"10.1002/edn3.300","title":"Urban environments harbor greater oomycete and <i>Phytophthora</i> diversity, creating a bridgehead for potential new pathogens to natural ecosystems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant Pathogens and Resistance","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Natural Resources Canada; FPInnovations; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; University of British Columbia","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Oomycete; Phytophthora ramorum; Ecosystem; Ecology; Biological dispersal; Biodiversity; Biology; Phytophthora; Natural (archaeology); Biota; Disturbance (geology); Urban ecology; Geography; Habitat; Population; Pathogen; Botany","score_opus":0.00868372837859368,"score_gpt":0.16543902121106363,"score_spread":0.15675529283246994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224255589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99589014,0.0004483568,0.000014867048,0.0002765438,0.00022829513,0.0004895054,0.0025640654,0.00002100676,0.0000672105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513984,0.000029340972,0.00018316126,0.00032092773,0.0002688595,0.00004399495,0.00026988084,0.0000031358074,0.0037408413],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986601,0.00006228569,0.0001657417,0.00046592893,0.0002973354,0.0003485988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962646,0.00003466587,0.00007478337,0.00006605494,0.0000010004904,0.00019701498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000119684766,0.00018592241,0.00018469934,0.000013076307,0.0011351977,0.00004358803,0.000211472,0.000039993363,0.00029883807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000028271256,0.00009806768,0.000108157496,0.00005910543,0.000031734697,0.00007906846,0.0007476901,0.00010149578,0.00002174692],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010436401,0.00005203192,0.025442455,0.000004062069,0.00001845042,0.000037358954,0.0000777523,0.000012773423,0.9686224,0.000004474487,0.0026358413,0.002988069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006635019,0.0006108796,0.80171365,0.000015263211,0.00005933041,0.0000895319,0.00048951164,0.00028249505,0.009434318,0.000016805157,0.1860793,0.0005453995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057355945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024429866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95918804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009881109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021030926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8731138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248338973","doi":"10.1002/edn3.v3.1","title":"Environmental DNA captures the genetic diversity of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) in West Greenland","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Naval Research","keywords":"Bay; Geography; Arctic; Fishery; Inlet; Environmental DNA; Oceanography; Archaeology; Ecology; Geology; Biology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.01028060446111369,"score_gpt":0.19133016389759258,"score_spread":0.18104955943647888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248338973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97190046,0.0061913594,0.000011818869,0.00019410625,0.001009203,0.0011732989,0.0026221848,0.00002356158,0.016874023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697177,0.009424876,0.0005298623,0.0004122983,0.00019830241,0.00005912544,0.00080275955,0.000102566206,0.0187525],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938144,0.0004956873,0.0009894618,0.0017246159,0.0018389565,0.0011368536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737865,0.00026937277,0.0006823631,0.0013720321,0.0000016258433,0.0002959706],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003455264,0.0012010875,0.0011654594,0.00014491931,0.00093953975,0.000062821615,0.0018273712,0.00066685124,0.04646815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023395147,0.0010727815,0.0005245335,0.0002538724,0.0035578273,0.00033571417,0.0081138145,0.0010701386,0.016026098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010695633,0.0011928077,0.9087742,0.00011425116,0.00032726993,0.00026306894,0.003322786,0.0015650757,0.018851696,0.0000014676423,0.06291606,0.0025643767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011500019,0.00019461807,0.94242984,0.00012448103,0.00028572945,0.000053182648,0.002891108,0.00002750376,0.0041616685,0.000021529047,0.04752961,0.0011307149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022401516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006918081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03365567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001987942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013696149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280524935","doi":"10.1002/edn3.310","title":"Sedimentary <scp>DNA</scp> of a human‐impacted lake in Western Canada (Cultus Lake) reveals changes in micro‐eukaryotic diversity over the past ~200 years","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Diatom; Biology; Sedimentary rock; Biodiversity; Ecology; Intracellular; Extracellular; Paleontology; Cell biology","score_opus":0.008996557685644904,"score_gpt":0.1819442512093105,"score_spread":0.17294769352366557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280524935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971028,0.00012406643,1.327905e-7,0.00023807862,0.00015500461,0.00066736987,0.0012082515,0.000015448273,0.00048885675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968422,0.00009468055,0.000038453596,0.0011629664,0.000025496374,0.000038465387,0.0002128052,0.000025686459,0.0015592698],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705154,0.0002902365,0.0003688093,0.0006084388,0.0010334316,0.0006475331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999082,0.00012439532,0.00022562989,0.0004362392,6.720919e-7,0.0001310355],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035492785,0.00034657237,0.00037561796,0.00009155268,0.00058762595,0.000014123897,0.0008225722,0.00006980971,0.004011868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009824325,0.00034506366,0.00008959689,0.0003274478,0.0005875703,0.00019340252,0.0046788924,0.00043521685,0.000096629934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014720746,0.00035695639,0.96619743,0.000009689795,0.00003892827,0.00014782115,0.0031779099,0.0004741778,0.01953541,3.261339e-7,0.009976747,0.00006989972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010865044,0.00016579028,0.98413867,0.000014728288,0.000036707454,0.000010356256,0.0044905073,0.000004577835,0.00086437544,0.000011713234,0.008984343,0.0001917146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09673948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5756455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47890607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020400567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007670539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281640466","doi":"10.1002/edn3.315","title":"Evaluation of lake sedimentary ancient <scp>DNA</scp> metabarcoding to assess fungal biodiversity in Arctic paleoecosystems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Academy of Finland; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Norges Forskningsråd; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Vetenskapsrådet; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Amplicon; Ancient DNA; Ecology; Mycobiota; Taxon; Polymerase chain reaction","score_opus":0.03738097883471758,"score_gpt":0.23055816211926305,"score_spread":0.19317718328454547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281640466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957009,0.00017997409,0.000009237591,0.00010559524,0.0004248573,0.0011705997,0.00077962043,0.000028115537,0.0016011004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984592,0.00003292407,0.00054057705,0.00045952087,0.000020172522,0.00013348163,0.00013873549,0.000017087046,0.00019828958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455225,0.00067071844,0.00046796448,0.00084144535,0.0028643175,0.00060327875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989557,0.00013526782,0.00023822939,0.00045438018,0.0000037753346,0.0002125911],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024926204,0.0003438049,0.00038086856,0.00018487118,0.00057079253,0.000018453984,0.0006059328,0.00006163534,0.0068359356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006227276,0.00040377962,0.00016004549,0.0004127706,0.0002979261,0.00033484824,0.0025923133,0.00029750736,0.001161977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013173524,0.00060305215,0.92297035,0.000012531597,0.00006647256,0.000024310231,0.001687961,0.009392665,0.06099431,0.0000013152279,0.00351959,0.00071427546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011669908,0.0002566834,0.96648365,0.000011996589,0.00018652403,0.000014175148,0.007110911,0.00031995404,0.013528598,0.000019292693,0.01069255,0.00020867778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003077267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049512467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04746571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032906737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008800628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283589851","doi":"10.1002/edn3.332","title":"Testing the effectiveness of environmental <scp>DNA</scp> (<scp>eDNA</scp>) to quantify larval amphibian abundance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Laurentian University; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Mesocosm; Tadpole (physics); Biology; Amphibian; Abundance (ecology); Leopard frog; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Environmental DNA; Abiotic component; Ecosystem; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.014461767399558713,"score_gpt":0.2048997539819414,"score_spread":0.1904379865823827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283589851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99143064,0.00040849549,0.000033341214,0.00006237034,0.00048460872,0.001731582,0.0013429874,0.00010757436,0.0043983734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611306,0.00006821141,0.0014240647,0.0005671295,0.00007728851,0.00029948197,0.00012218548,0.00011325106,0.001215353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99338233,0.0010243646,0.00072716706,0.0015274786,0.0020639254,0.0012747122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955174,0.002467804,0.00045368873,0.0011585623,0.0000018737588,0.0004006772],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016287204,0.00081951247,0.000685447,0.00012773504,0.0020530182,0.000064086904,0.0017550292,0.00015218953,0.0010015663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028322617,0.0007938337,0.00036303035,0.0005751432,0.0018335426,0.00043115296,0.0055079046,0.00074367004,0.002510723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022368318,0.0006713501,0.60355437,0.000023471848,0.000100821344,0.000031258893,0.0014767,0.0028311813,0.3882737,0.000015515996,0.002242361,0.0007569055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009060369,0.0009884619,0.90462095,0.000028163413,0.000100467245,0.000058984268,0.0067040185,0.000061433435,0.061639525,0.0001202134,0.02453333,0.00023840718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011844929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015287196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32663417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020334867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009075281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287958791","doi":"10.1002/edn3.335","title":"Comparative analysis of zooplankton diversity in freshwaters: What can we gain from metagenomic analysis?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; Concordia University; McGill University; Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Groupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologie; Concordia University; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Université du Québec à Montréal; Canada Research Chairs; McGill University","keywords":"Metagenomics; Biology; Biodiversity; Zooplankton; Environmental DNA; Genetic diversity; Ecology; Computational biology; Archaea; Community structure; Evolutionary biology; Gene; Genetics","score_opus":0.02270313338928139,"score_gpt":0.21578513559491566,"score_spread":0.19308200220563426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287958791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964331,0.00048498265,0.000022509763,0.00012212535,0.00008827481,0.00028889306,0.0021575945,0.00001695122,0.00038558806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976204,0.00045120178,0.00052381156,0.00018486979,0.0000060560683,0.000023243627,0.0009082754,0.000008700579,0.00027346637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971617,0.00034427142,0.00041441974,0.0008053143,0.0008740953,0.0004002335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989678,0.00011949258,0.00027064182,0.0005171813,5.786619e-7,0.00012430601],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027932928,0.0003193505,0.0008335131,0.00043998897,0.00059705396,0.00002579029,0.0007086982,0.000057512276,0.023066415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000024207566,0.00035529732,0.00044952868,0.0013166142,0.0006302246,0.00037968755,0.0045730625,0.0002621838,0.00019368899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006104099,0.00040497913,0.87436396,0.0000012711947,0.0030441992,0.000029218754,0.013086561,0.094269134,0.014371482,0.0000014412949,0.00017926369,0.0001874582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005147761,0.00009341374,0.96523,0.0000024091746,0.0033925672,3.8460013e-7,0.022840708,0.002918431,0.0039527677,0.000047910617,0.0006442231,0.00036241786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00517317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035214466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091350704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018124421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001939102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289518707","doi":"10.1002/edn3.341","title":"Relationship between brook charr (<i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i>) <scp>eDNA</scp> concentration and angling data in structured wildlife areas","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Salvelinus; Fontinalis; Fishing; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Population; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Trout; Demography","score_opus":0.024856225310365108,"score_gpt":0.22185697094069468,"score_spread":0.19700074563032957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289518707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99653286,0.0004944088,0.000030779192,0.00018439029,0.00014106366,0.0005650184,0.0012922836,0.0000488721,0.00071033265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996656,0.00005691369,0.0011305396,0.00046814082,0.00006619847,0.0000345427,0.0011226715,0.000032098073,0.00043289454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971177,0.0002261174,0.00041267966,0.000948291,0.0008079624,0.00048727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986821,0.00029249102,0.00020255102,0.00064788875,5.913621e-7,0.00017440545],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045961828,0.00032618805,0.0002841875,0.000045684417,0.0008183463,0.00004543759,0.00067462964,0.00009224697,0.00053533836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009481738,0.00038525817,0.000052183743,0.00018697334,0.0005556053,0.00063588074,0.00302422,0.00047092864,0.00016565938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075215257,0.000083240426,0.993563,0.0000063052116,0.000019156778,0.000017961072,0.0010762512,0.00028517412,0.0024320562,0.000014271811,0.0019771715,0.000517881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084809907,0.00012446023,0.98564404,0.000005891604,0.00005144331,0.000016070795,0.002220974,0.00013518805,0.0005464461,0.00025182933,0.009957537,0.00019801641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013413584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051802162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007980366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008374061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004313801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289981979","doi":"10.1002/edn3.347","title":"Environmental DNA tracks zooplankton population dynamics in experimental mesocosms","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada First Research Excellence Fund","keywords":"Mesocosm; Abiotic component; Zooplankton; Daphnia magna; Ecology; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Environmental DNA; Population; Plankton; Biomass (ecology); Environmental science; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Chemistry","score_opus":0.006869418736033426,"score_gpt":0.1937957928071887,"score_spread":0.18692637407115528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289981979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930812,0.00027478137,0.000010685861,0.00015009304,0.0003881865,0.0009003463,0.00056616886,0.0000893342,0.0045391745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961202,0.00007615709,0.00058590475,0.00045839616,0.00004289644,0.00024175123,0.0009905758,0.00007663181,0.0014074495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956194,0.00027969098,0.00062129943,0.0011881373,0.0014133324,0.0008781338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988689,0.00005982394,0.00024272024,0.0005954236,2.2233928e-7,0.00023290038],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036084084,0.0006006949,0.00044158648,0.00014514383,0.0010480075,0.00003721729,0.0007336136,0.00013855884,0.026335757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005646399,0.00072663574,0.0002244686,0.00022699668,0.00060028676,0.00055514433,0.00246274,0.00060236076,0.0017852404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011120522,0.0015870725,0.9367664,0.0000037310942,0.00003193552,0.00011355502,0.0011487536,0.002546047,0.053739168,0.000029371056,0.0011272378,0.0027955251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016348952,0.00043447243,0.9704892,0.0000053301947,0.000033587497,0.000068374866,0.009560124,0.00145319,0.009361984,0.00009492137,0.0059489566,0.00091494486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044423316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009878955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044377185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010841335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027107556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294884043","doi":"10.1002/edn3.353","title":"Metatranscriptomics reveals a shift in microbial community composition and function during summer months in a coastal marine environment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; Tula Foundation; University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Research and Development; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Abiotic component; Ecology; Biology; Microbial population biology; Upwelling; Plankton; Temperate climate; Oceanography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.00886076468811677,"score_gpt":0.18917348199969405,"score_spread":0.18031271731157728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294884043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987682,0.000037943304,0.00001241466,0.000118871656,0.000081908176,0.00041838322,0.00010790161,0.000013366972,0.0004410029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988528,0.00006602216,0.00009160155,0.00038120145,0.000009524163,0.00006587573,0.00042073912,0.000019920712,0.00009234803],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977174,0.0011704069,0.000337376,0.0002956217,0.00013286965,0.00034634056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947524,0.00006964592,0.00008677767,0.0003029914,1.9576592e-7,0.00006512132],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005169534,0.00020779207,0.0002603158,0.000084479994,0.00059157447,0.000009491261,0.00024518967,0.00008083206,0.009035884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000021898204,0.0002573491,0.000053918975,0.00009830466,0.0003374819,0.00017622446,0.0014254716,0.00097026076,0.00008050549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048038102,0.0008654268,0.27296948,0.000009421562,0.000012918964,0.000016642569,0.0018914437,0.00307011,0.7202681,0.000015384472,0.00006538688,0.00033535078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016685853,0.0002283727,0.9931651,0.0000042418646,0.000017097134,0.000030195322,0.0006959444,0.00007899686,0.001954405,0.00073592196,0.0011698351,0.00025134327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024023845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007116953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7201956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057558395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004029675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296613398","doi":"10.1002/edn3.348","title":"Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> reveals anadromous river herring habitat use and recolonization after restoration of aquatic connectivity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science; Maryland Sea Grant, University of Maryland; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"Fish migration; Alewife; Alosa; Tributary; Fishery; Habitat; Nursery habitat; Ecology; Herring; Restoration ecology; Watershed; Environmental science; Biology; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.010111549576964434,"score_gpt":0.1798342674677082,"score_spread":0.16972271789074375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296613398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99815804,0.00022749385,0.000047458965,0.000049479557,0.00016589937,0.0007190886,0.00039728047,0.000039008082,0.00019623194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970903,0.00018957775,0.0014554783,0.00024083676,0.000020487594,0.00011361281,0.000117053634,0.000044166274,0.00072852185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710006,0.00035701258,0.00043485258,0.0007920192,0.00085944124,0.00045659728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880093,0.00026333,0.00032221584,0.00044115394,7.033392e-7,0.00017166726],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037513342,0.0003746451,0.00034936733,0.0000899614,0.0007151975,0.000034640692,0.00026541055,0.0000977973,0.0013967317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005915488,0.00044258795,0.00010925192,0.00015520095,0.0010819875,0.0008593636,0.0016071427,0.0002749694,0.0002850034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024783332,0.00038424233,0.9065555,0.000009805443,0.00004302998,0.000038983508,0.0021842327,0.0006427706,0.088802904,0.000002403896,0.0007045401,0.0006068185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006664291,0.0003967664,0.98915464,0.000008841986,0.00007833371,0.000035285513,0.0016564286,0.0002521424,0.00562591,0.00012902489,0.0017667623,0.00022941401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018597434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057368572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08317699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015469058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002840895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298142635","doi":"10.1002/edn3.359","title":"Development and validation of targeted environmental <scp>DNA</scp> (<scp>eDNA</scp>) metabarcoding for early detection of 69 invasive fishes and aquatic invertebrates","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biology; Primer (cosmetics); Invertebrate; Polymerase chain reaction; Invasive species; DNA sequencing; Ecology; DNA; Zoology; Biodiversity; Genetics; Gene; Chemistry","score_opus":0.012644675871859608,"score_gpt":0.18015652550212322,"score_spread":0.1675118496302636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298142635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975765,0.0006715886,0.000121868565,0.00001565411,0.000113795366,0.0010113904,0.0002950349,0.000028356068,0.00016583267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941092,0.00031421613,0.0047321757,0.00007827803,0.000015179525,0.00017947053,0.0001766935,0.000044468215,0.00035029708],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971704,0.00016313467,0.0006179355,0.00077028014,0.0007975059,0.00048072686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985014,0.0005461556,0.00050692086,0.0002714388,0.000001051619,0.00017302703],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043169473,0.00043473748,0.00047472215,0.00013820859,0.00078694633,0.000027302387,0.00029837404,0.00010572003,0.00016166554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010177344,0.00048809225,0.00012432474,0.0001534489,0.00091649534,0.0005069215,0.0013949585,0.00020619153,0.000047506946],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010626194,0.00023993045,0.41475755,0.00003655863,0.00014091573,0.0000022130005,0.005937447,0.00008818269,0.5767997,0.0000028792963,0.00016696798,0.0018170686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074644753,0.0004528041,0.42418626,0.000009568811,0.00010144105,0.000007855772,0.008701577,0.0001314172,0.5635706,0.00009184565,0.0018911478,0.00010900287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006153704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016363761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013229041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059410965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000062757667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312199489","doi":"10.1002/edn3.384","title":"Development and field validation of <scp>RPA‐CRISPR‐Cas</scp> environmental <scp>DNA</scp> assays for the detection of brown trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i>) and Arctic char (<i>Salvelinus alpinus</i>)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Marine Institute","keywords":"Salmo; Recombinase Polymerase Amplification; Brown trout; Arctic char; Salvelinus; Loop-mediated isothermal amplification; Nucleic acid; DNA; Salmonidae; Biology; Trout; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Genetics","score_opus":0.010423535197576625,"score_gpt":0.19394860083237103,"score_spread":0.1835250656347944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312199489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99582547,0.0011041483,0.0007587451,0.00008894539,0.0002546638,0.001325424,0.00039117475,0.000033550696,0.0002178906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958323,0.00065802556,0.00213947,0.00027377254,0.000045360168,0.00026745844,0.00010435061,0.00005620801,0.0006230464],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656534,0.0001721995,0.0007244273,0.00090276834,0.0010271226,0.0006081141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978189,0.0009697919,0.00054748106,0.0004796608,0.000002213272,0.00018196266],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006806099,0.00051873486,0.000492429,0.00010319306,0.0011357231,0.000033311928,0.00048987125,0.00015197936,0.00027708325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000964495,0.00050065474,0.0001948295,0.00015046059,0.0009464519,0.00034270564,0.001708459,0.0003614068,0.000054666063],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048936185,0.00062435126,0.35650918,0.00007754532,0.00025249217,0.000008114429,0.007336061,0.00035856338,0.6191038,0.000007802703,0.0007810914,0.014892096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012437872,0.0006053434,0.46829045,0.0000125293345,0.00019836836,0.000046413013,0.00955776,0.00018064752,0.5013892,0.00006364389,0.018256491,0.0001553371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010424673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001751998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117714554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076328573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000062723184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313378893","doi":"10.1002/edn3.381","title":"Interspecific allometric scaling in <scp>eDNA</scp> production among northwestern Atlantic bony fishes reflects physiological allometric scaling","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Allometry; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Interspecific competition; Intraspecific competition; Ecology; Biomass (ecology); Organism; Range (aeronautics); Zoology","score_opus":0.01781376872981531,"score_gpt":0.202905622649142,"score_spread":0.1850918539193267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313378893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971483,0.00041910168,0.0000145121585,0.00008058702,0.00054443994,0.0008036574,0.000053276268,0.00011441745,0.0008217076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973151,0.00045475303,0.00064938574,0.00020752875,0.000100749865,0.00013438739,0.00015819205,0.00005501429,0.0009248681],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523,0.00033141076,0.0006219178,0.0015195674,0.0013185063,0.000978591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867225,0.00022412257,0.00030802758,0.0005721804,0.0000015518639,0.000221884],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059863867,0.00055281876,0.00050778355,0.000568957,0.0008944063,0.000065176726,0.0008313814,0.00013829334,0.0015424652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001385462,0.0005880195,0.00023226466,0.0018039766,0.0007352627,0.0005639063,0.002893454,0.0007849919,0.0009321423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018495108,0.00080016267,0.95428926,0.000012550617,0.00004873935,0.00006780214,0.001904266,0.0062771053,0.03354673,0.0000015232429,0.0018325571,0.0012007891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058645423,0.00040962995,0.98391664,0.000018090455,0.0000394605,0.000028401277,0.00725749,0.00018486311,0.0033226565,0.000042030857,0.0038532584,0.00034101665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033508695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000968032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030224074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027377894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003054475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315796344","doi":"10.1002/edn3.385","title":"Airborne eDNA documents a diverse and ecologically complex tropical bat and other mammal community","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Edwards Lifesciences","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Sampling (signal processing); Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Citizen science; Environmental science; Biology; Filter (signal processing)","score_opus":0.028591642187279553,"score_gpt":0.22891504159378087,"score_spread":0.20032339940650132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315796344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952829,0.00003077042,0.000005032386,0.000304527,0.00006517114,0.00034440836,0.00016277343,0.00010568779,0.003698724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962804,0.00029118435,0.0011751102,0.0009512033,0.000022899052,0.000020756037,0.0000412286,0.000021531496,0.0011957148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981803,0.0002170092,0.00021994818,0.00048785255,0.0004064,0.00048847694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999249,0.00012524475,0.000073469775,0.00031438353,4.1583763e-7,0.000237488],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019957052,0.00030949703,0.00026389034,0.00004244422,0.00087959575,0.000041766518,0.0002998674,0.0001185447,0.005049778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017637672,0.00029012215,0.00006222163,0.00010726798,0.0018033556,0.000223092,0.0028788287,0.00030323525,0.0031594578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003818225,0.0002069706,0.9801626,0.00000734977,0.000037888127,0.000033161527,0.0006541431,0.000016181484,0.01076212,0.000024034785,0.004367746,0.0036896267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088401185,0.00026046915,0.9763063,0.0000052726573,0.000033996384,0.000016068576,0.0015761035,0.0000798601,0.000284131,0.0003312352,0.01990704,0.0003154807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002157198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006392337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015539294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027844225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.1742494e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317534803","doi":"10.1002/edn3.388","title":"Answers blowing in the wind: Detection of birds, mammals, and amphibians with airborne environmental <scp>DNA</scp> in a natural environment over a yearlong survey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Genome Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada; Texas Tech University","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biological dispersal; Vertebrate; Natural (archaeology); Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.007898787262493262,"score_gpt":0.18161416888913412,"score_spread":0.17371538162664085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317534803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982942,0.0003189379,0.0000048682773,0.00006188608,0.000083723295,0.00084472896,0.0001900005,0.000040403953,0.00016127896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981864,0.0009421073,0.00013024216,0.00015423907,0.000020332447,0.00004601427,0.000095681404,0.00005631596,0.0003686427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623126,0.00038220617,0.0005197398,0.000972039,0.0010796925,0.00081508997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875706,0.00037472855,0.00020535183,0.0005316957,3.9369084e-7,0.00013078477],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009491692,0.0005271559,0.00044396234,0.00022262051,0.00025832825,0.000037118312,0.00048574837,0.00017103541,0.00020600407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001889357,0.00044921157,0.000108526765,0.00046194263,0.0013370572,0.0004683878,0.0007918931,0.00047829325,0.00048149808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048648326,0.000319138,0.8984376,0.000011338881,0.00004054651,0.00010837622,0.0034566228,0.0008298818,0.09413485,8.8586967e-7,0.00011680093,0.0024953038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001451809,0.0002791677,0.98209846,0.000030366495,0.000036720183,0.000026224066,0.0061279675,0.00025036937,0.008342262,0.000013503756,0.0010692069,0.00027394455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010676834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010701243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08579259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007951531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031211216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319832609","doi":"10.1002/edn3.392","title":"Optimized <scp>DNA</scp> isolation from marine sponges for natural sampler <scp>DNA</scp> metabarcoding","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Sponge; Environmental DNA; DNA extraction; DNA; Biology; Homogenization (climate); Biodiversity; Ecology; Polymerase chain reaction; Botany; Biochemistry; Gene","score_opus":0.01734538957809457,"score_gpt":0.21614593564763615,"score_spread":0.1988005460695416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319832609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924713,0.00028926015,0.00037656285,0.00022016789,0.000846183,0.001333869,0.0010812067,0.00035194,0.0030295157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414282,0.001174535,0.037833143,0.000679169,0.00033580864,0.00025530593,0.002776004,0.00016724554,0.015350589],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524105,0.00016988344,0.00065302505,0.0015147815,0.0011195329,0.0013017256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972012,0.0013605282,0.0003541754,0.00073725,0.000003287417,0.00034355704],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051762484,0.0008187018,0.0007016907,0.00017111294,0.0009946654,0.00012343604,0.0008404129,0.00028151937,0.0016948474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029277662,0.00084290537,0.0004611066,0.00038291293,0.000827858,0.00091261446,0.0025735586,0.00042068047,0.0065499493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006073658,0.00048338246,0.52531624,0.000035004603,0.00052443304,0.0000633397,0.0031288504,0.0024478876,0.41865343,0.000027326658,0.044025403,0.0052339537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024568657,0.00017603078,0.8826076,0.000021672877,0.00025478663,0.000008683863,0.0035524946,0.0024363566,0.0497646,0.000509492,0.057900373,0.00031104655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025333322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004567461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36888883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010077921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004339511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366590770","doi":"10.1002/edn3.423","title":"Paired environmental <scp>DNA</scp> and dive surveys provide distinct but complementary snapshots of marine biodiversity in a temperate fjord","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Tula Foundation","funders":"Hakai Institute; Tula Foundation","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Fjord; Benthic zone; Biodiversity; Invertebrate; Marine invertebrates; Ecology; Biology; Marine ecosystem; Fishery; Habitat; Ecosystem; Oceanography; Geology","score_opus":0.01678042907038937,"score_gpt":0.19421916177991655,"score_spread":0.17743873270952717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366590770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996131,0.000067077424,0.000004681998,0.0001381856,0.00013906023,0.0009810976,0.0015987722,0.0000755022,0.0008646413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963651,0.00065845286,0.00046331805,0.00016598134,0.000022837543,0.000042957756,0.0012399069,0.000035601082,0.0010058936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589133,0.00043969462,0.0006511566,0.0011787304,0.00090953277,0.00092956773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985913,0.0002844806,0.0002847339,0.00053172675,0.0000010001335,0.0003067698],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008191344,0.00063214416,0.00061823224,0.00018743175,0.00054189895,0.00003356909,0.00057757297,0.00016478835,0.0028597636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003371773,0.0006750832,0.00017077556,0.00034157958,0.0021094978,0.0005030015,0.0045316387,0.00030815304,0.0023492267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002710745,0.00048708208,0.92777383,0.00002904032,0.0000837616,0.00009338455,0.0012364218,0.00005681175,0.065557994,0.000001090738,0.0027762873,0.0018771737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017956367,0.00030163606,0.97737145,0.000018033428,0.00006538082,0.000013096198,0.004400219,0.00010660982,0.013699809,0.00006316281,0.0018206321,0.0003443489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018371517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004287463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05185818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008743773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003976425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376275248","doi":"10.1002/edn3.424","title":"Including environmental covariates clarifies the relationship between endangered Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) abundance and environmental <scp>DNA</scp>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; New Brunswick Innovation Foundation; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Salmo; Environmental DNA; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat; Fishery; Biology; Relative species abundance; Endangered species; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.029695007839225938,"score_gpt":0.22650200350393157,"score_spread":0.19680699566470564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376275248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955503,0.00063149,0.00003988112,0.0005186279,0.00027666942,0.0010916248,0.0008502076,0.00028779838,0.0007534433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99381214,0.0013529175,0.000595753,0.000373787,0.0001956808,0.000119023985,0.0010626506,0.00013341669,0.0023546193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943305,0.00039543232,0.00080796203,0.0016058352,0.0014696468,0.0013906249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629337,0.0018714978,0.00042118385,0.0009872862,6.414343e-7,0.00042602659],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086392986,0.0009657259,0.000651552,0.0001681192,0.0025026537,0.00016781643,0.001007609,0.00041248777,0.00080203445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001251362,0.0008828213,0.00028480042,0.00038330455,0.0031195364,0.00087234966,0.0033096469,0.0008817292,0.007685586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001423569,0.00017055337,0.9358783,0.000017667488,0.00011762543,0.00005241108,0.0028240916,0.00010594287,0.05659952,0.000026623075,0.003492629,0.0007003983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009580325,0.0001795003,0.97249645,0.000031651474,0.00020191564,0.000042042797,0.005292979,0.000111456124,0.0067878235,0.00054803427,0.012830648,0.0005194701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016023235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025737465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049811695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012132213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000048332104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378086011","doi":"10.1002/edn3.422","title":"Using <scp>qPCR</scp> of environmental <scp>DNA</scp> (<scp>eDNA</scp>) to estimate the biomass of juvenile Pacific salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus</i> spp.)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tula Foundation; University of British Columbia","funders":"Hakai Institute; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Tula Foundation","keywords":"Mesocosm; Environmental DNA; Biomass (ecology); Juvenile; Biology; Fishery; Chinook wind; Hatchery; Oncorhynchus; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.016848465013387205,"score_gpt":0.23818079369718995,"score_spread":0.22133232868380273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378086011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98815614,0.00056913355,0.000097003045,0.000085595195,0.00054193044,0.0016577691,0.0022482104,0.00020080288,0.006443416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903472,0.000542157,0.0033087719,0.00023232019,0.00012538771,0.00009822004,0.00028233093,0.0001974164,0.004866183],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919064,0.00036942717,0.001484873,0.0018438797,0.0024353394,0.001960075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953511,0.0012901691,0.0010012968,0.0016831334,0.0000044777385,0.00066982745],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010227098,0.0012673923,0.0012335808,0.0003362721,0.0010692643,0.000087289256,0.0018659162,0.00045027994,0.00048882276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026323265,0.0011863845,0.00066330616,0.0010762945,0.003225257,0.0007334801,0.0041066674,0.00060407945,0.0065468494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076858,0.0006432903,0.38591892,0.000059040904,0.00020684353,0.000056861005,0.0038695377,0.002571385,0.58759207,0.0000079284355,0.018455876,0.0006105974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010355593,0.00066075806,0.6466889,0.00007414308,0.00025742882,0.000047106492,0.014988713,0.00051557436,0.29537308,0.00014232755,0.039986055,0.00023037892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018927547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030476254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29221895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014137037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000162853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378229030","doi":"10.1002/edn3.432","title":"Toward a national <scp>eDNA</scp> strategy for the United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Scale (ratio); Environmental DNA; Resource management (computing); Environmental planning; Natural resource; Business; Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.04018921604400201,"score_gpt":0.23937832685878777,"score_spread":0.19918911081478574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378229030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99494255,0.00008758012,0.00014106004,0.0006804696,0.00019135298,0.0007528152,0.0008209371,0.00015559596,0.0022276633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99078554,0.00080299727,0.00056633377,0.000957075,0.00008347045,0.0001892139,0.00083239534,0.000041754192,0.005741216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780583,0.00005206886,0.00024153652,0.0005163802,0.00080520805,0.00057899364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988654,0.00064945716,0.000101268575,0.00025668213,0.00000192103,0.00012525517],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034525816,0.00029335354,0.00016662032,0.000074019976,0.0007038025,0.000051697207,0.00052583456,0.00009066702,0.00084798736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006338822,0.00023792427,0.00014829109,0.0003491247,0.00082534674,0.0002109756,0.0007221809,0.00016213849,0.0059314338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035996898,0.0005038699,0.33063465,0.00003491682,0.0004467016,0.000025846546,0.0054763793,0.084248506,0.021220222,0.00031543098,0.55362463,0.0034328687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072388735,0.0002661565,0.7002857,0.0000051434286,0.00005025103,0.000006744215,0.007163862,0.004341017,0.0037376676,0.0013539057,0.28187603,0.00018963766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008733862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011618046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36965105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005327582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030683284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379743578","doi":"10.1002/edn3.437","title":"Assessing the degradation of environmental <scp>DNA</scp> and <scp>RNA</scp> based on genomic origin in a metabarcoding context","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biology; Barcode; Context (archaeology); Biodiversity; Molecular marker; DNA barcoding; Taxon; Ecology; Computational biology; Evolutionary biology; Microcosm; Genetics; Gene; Computer science","score_opus":0.02379390955380293,"score_gpt":0.23382366900543675,"score_spread":0.21002975945163382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379743578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99628425,0.00025615495,0.000033692588,0.00014165671,0.0001621009,0.00074434746,0.00017150062,0.00006437481,0.0021419502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676174,0.00056815834,0.0007304849,0.00042519075,0.0000332022,0.00005821381,0.00011413129,0.000058641534,0.0012502272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964674,0.00028719194,0.00057786744,0.0009352527,0.0009615628,0.0007707169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979193,0.0010086107,0.0003375559,0.0005506241,6.795692e-7,0.00018319653],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007702624,0.0005380719,0.00046753112,0.00020031972,0.00059846684,0.000089205016,0.00054155616,0.0001667963,0.00031907362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009247985,0.00047992254,0.00017549371,0.00034098,0.0014484933,0.000620636,0.00094954844,0.00040839275,0.0013384208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048489924,0.0002680749,0.67563134,0.00001338445,0.000041297702,0.000030110306,0.0010953255,0.0013087721,0.31623742,0.000015047156,0.00088278885,0.0044715703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011064155,0.00015347546,0.9432602,0.000037311493,0.00006861386,0.0000069865405,0.010075312,0.0022130376,0.038716394,0.00006356845,0.004159496,0.0001391799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011690583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002653308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.277521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009733108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006759392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380081328","doi":"10.1002/edn3.438","title":"Enabling robust environmental DNA assay design with “unikseq” for the identification of taxon‐specific regions within whole mitochondrial genomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Biology; Environmental DNA; Mitochondrial DNA; DNA barcoding; Computational biology; Evolutionary biology; Genome; Genetics; Gene; Ecology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.03341825578848926,"score_gpt":0.20390276461879314,"score_spread":0.1704845088303039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380081328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96696526,0.00077193795,0.024773622,0.00097147253,0.0008035059,0.004120678,0.0010947388,0.00020681987,0.0002919808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823945,0.0012000925,0.010820721,0.00013459237,0.0001646465,0.0004339335,0.00037007465,0.00010126316,0.0043801875],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962985,0.00019953478,0.0007429527,0.0010145049,0.0010405106,0.0007039855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782956,0.00052817515,0.0005574575,0.0009176342,0.0000020438708,0.00016513816],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082376617,0.00051605783,0.0003964748,0.000116915384,0.0011702477,0.0000711018,0.0008681042,0.00016624965,0.0007595328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031723335,0.00041468246,0.00023018455,0.0003513139,0.0019102588,0.00046801893,0.0007147596,0.0002616766,0.0018764288],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032405273,0.0004885711,0.05589519,0.000021028285,0.00025574217,0.000020048845,0.0028888488,0.055849753,0.86663693,0.00003841884,0.014841412,0.0027399906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004809054,0.001213223,0.52538556,0.00007366385,0.0006207144,0.000055729186,0.023440793,0.007346565,0.3239761,0.0004766598,0.11045863,0.0021432787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026137457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012711554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54266083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073640206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006157289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382449738","doi":"10.1002/edn3.444","title":"How <scp>eDNA</scp> data filtration, sequence coverage, and primer selection influence assessment of fish communities in northern temperate lakes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Environmental DNA; Primer (cosmetics); Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Temperate climate; Biodiversity; Ecology; Sample (material); Range (aeronautics); Fishery; Geography; Chemistry","score_opus":0.02667286432502379,"score_gpt":0.24155192482123813,"score_spread":0.21487906049621436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382449738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982302,0.000035393754,0.000020198964,0.00019952215,0.000047824138,0.00038260833,0.00062603725,0.000051591946,0.0004066013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967629,0.0011226488,0.0006236637,0.00020307869,0.000012101901,0.00002756593,0.0005907264,0.000020697404,0.0006366278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981441,0.00016146037,0.00028947435,0.00050039584,0.00053413573,0.00037044042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990068,0.00018580933,0.0001693338,0.0005518568,0.0000022480501,0.00008397123],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036502522,0.00026874212,0.00025138404,0.00008067103,0.00032315718,0.000065217566,0.00053861446,0.0000938898,0.00009581014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044089775,0.00028451858,0.00003257205,0.00028651548,0.000955157,0.0010982855,0.0014084642,0.00024075138,0.00009295246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002405941,0.00010200744,0.93113023,0.00001623329,0.000027868675,0.0000042721913,0.0009489367,0.0020133636,0.06440309,0.000004268857,0.0008535534,0.00049376435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003808899,0.00014455916,0.985872,0.000023345909,0.000020175268,0.0000065365302,0.003326669,0.0009748612,0.005061299,0.00004524804,0.004000327,0.00014413027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043812935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003441136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05934179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037124197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063261537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385369073","doi":"10.1002/edn3.459","title":"Beyond species detection<b>—</b>leveraging environmental DNA and environmental RNA to push beyond presence/absence applications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Ecology; Identification (biology); Biology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.009046726181211464,"score_gpt":0.19058289279261115,"score_spread":0.18153616661139968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385369073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906297,0.00024128794,0.00034330462,0.0005347689,0.00039780684,0.0017900188,0.00097034784,0.00031034584,0.0047824495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881335,0.0013243062,0.0017389421,0.00078405935,0.00020900527,0.00045825253,0.00037777043,0.000115784715,0.0068584154],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433357,0.00014005572,0.00069191563,0.0019797157,0.0014897765,0.0013649608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977706,0.00019762595,0.00024004618,0.0010217124,8.5880714e-7,0.0007691634],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039454637,0.00090886204,0.0005527388,0.00025921088,0.001686573,0.00014162704,0.0009078579,0.00025017836,0.0048702676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020197445,0.001020663,0.00023332739,0.00047462728,0.0020320683,0.00085585896,0.0034676327,0.00048818003,0.0150484145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046767014,0.00036792166,0.25286663,0.0000148297595,0.000086954715,0.00005719467,0.0023036555,0.00040100128,0.7188721,0.000015180107,0.0042113075,0.020756522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009622583,0.00028375335,0.81556183,0.00001756675,0.0001026429,0.00006899093,0.0060701477,0.00038326308,0.10811361,0.00063954893,0.06634266,0.001453752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000611526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027984323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6107584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014310693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039309934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385417599","doi":"10.1002/edn3.455","title":"Differential ecological adaptation of diverse <i>Chaetoceros</i> species revealed by metabarcoding analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Chinese Academy of Sciences; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Chaetoceros; Biology; Ecology; Phytoplankton; Bay; Plankton; Adaptation (eye); Algal bloom; Marine ecosystem; Ecosystem; Oceanography; Nutrient","score_opus":0.019122142807248988,"score_gpt":0.21145743301699052,"score_spread":0.19233529020974152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385417599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99823076,0.00000905245,0.00020091786,0.000060800518,0.000081552265,0.00014450379,0.00016705903,0.00003696192,0.001068419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971255,0.00011131213,0.00008296917,0.00008618586,0.000015612555,0.000011639391,0.0006615854,0.00000815229,0.0018970638],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883235,0.00022614519,0.00024604474,0.0002653848,0.00016576165,0.0002642981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944454,0.00012687195,0.00012337566,0.00023851029,8.2764467e-7,0.00006587725],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015174887,0.00014596502,0.0002950638,0.00006907362,0.00022821288,0.000006077828,0.00027652472,0.0001066002,0.04340287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014455758,0.00013739729,0.00017662962,0.00037135734,0.00046308088,0.00010286418,0.0005370127,0.00015497293,0.0009400489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040769817,0.00025473323,0.13395971,0.0000035602134,0.00017717524,0.0000056077056,0.0005183765,0.0023561686,0.8560812,0.00002850151,0.006105102,0.0004691251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040591284,0.00014142184,0.9770938,0.0000016173859,0.00026421837,0.0000012618395,0.0007825983,0.0015872633,0.015010241,0.00015926936,0.004345784,0.00020661335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010750265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022673124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8431341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009571445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000017132484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385556024","doi":"10.1002/edn3.460","title":"A validated and optimized environmental<scp>DNA</scp>and<scp>RNA</scp>assay to detect Arctic grayling (<i>Thymallus arcticus</i>)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates; Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Grayling; Environmental DNA; Biology; Arctic; Rainbow trout; Ecology; Fishery; Trout; Habitat; Zoology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.010572739058766932,"score_gpt":0.19760146477241716,"score_spread":0.18702872571365023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385556024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952189,0.0004898293,0.00020053357,0.00024575734,0.00032241296,0.0014374007,0.00031105583,0.00035189855,0.0014222423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982635,0.0030808991,0.008266935,0.0011081817,0.0000958869,0.0001898815,0.00020333554,0.00016735023,0.00425253],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936432,0.0003572488,0.00077244797,0.0020871228,0.0014047573,0.0017352115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679846,0.0009625037,0.00031104308,0.00090194383,0.0000018532385,0.001024178],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090972986,0.0011071564,0.0008369268,0.00027630027,0.0012946165,0.00018947611,0.000776373,0.0003538425,0.00061623886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026818397,0.0011677884,0.00026590453,0.00053982734,0.0017605604,0.0006555948,0.003954074,0.0006206679,0.008534351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038500642,0.00036406523,0.42161146,0.00006142165,0.00031997357,0.00027656805,0.0045892573,0.0019413219,0.55864835,0.0000064056376,0.006579042,0.0055636195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027303572,0.00058714865,0.8996298,0.000073869756,0.00030698956,0.00012314168,0.0056901746,0.00060907303,0.06253536,0.000304617,0.026822582,0.0005869426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017909144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018764347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.496113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011720969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004684527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386094226","doi":"10.1002/edn3.463","title":"Processes driving individual variation in environmental <scp>DNA</scp> deposition rates in <i>Daphnia magna</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada First Research Excellence Fund","keywords":"Daphnia magna; Biology; Environmental DNA; Abiotic component; Deposition (geology); Population; Intraspecific competition; Abundance (ecology); Daphnia; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Zoology; Biodiversity; Zooplankton","score_opus":0.008844783620425576,"score_gpt":0.19492719510126835,"score_spread":0.18608241148084279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386094226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99721074,0.00017651694,0.00001746456,0.000103156795,0.00016988677,0.00079231174,0.00019627911,0.00013762736,0.0011960198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99626285,0.0012416153,0.00088684144,0.00026193509,0.000051875515,0.00015715038,0.00046489108,0.00006246043,0.0006104116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601,0.0001533186,0.00062600174,0.0011148284,0.0010958177,0.0010000176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989107,0.00029190487,0.00022014133,0.00038712495,6.711977e-7,0.00018945162],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053015066,0.00055064354,0.000394442,0.00028685338,0.00035721256,0.0000781026,0.00057883904,0.0002443262,0.0007603037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006831258,0.0006300763,0.00010331462,0.00077590597,0.00057844876,0.0010303211,0.0013281839,0.0004037998,0.005945204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000868245,0.0004637751,0.84416205,0.000017816275,0.00002138908,0.00009864001,0.0029979916,0.0010972434,0.14917278,0.0000017873552,0.00094656314,0.0010112943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010865969,0.00013313543,0.9660172,0.00004466877,0.00003318692,0.00001474536,0.0025062296,0.0002926444,0.02837638,0.00013655753,0.0010376332,0.00032102485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014847661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020897626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12185516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013669863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060078455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386224620","doi":"10.1002/edn3.467","title":"Detection of fish sedimentary <scp>DNA</scp> in aquatic systems: A review of methodological challenges and future opportunities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; McGill University; University of Guelph; University of Victoria","funders":"Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research; Liber Ero Foundation; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Metagenomics; Aquatic ecosystem; Biology; Abiotic component; Ecology; Population dynamics of fisheries; Population; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity; Fishery","score_opus":0.16866179237658047,"score_gpt":0.2973472483486995,"score_spread":0.12868545597211906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386224620","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034770253,0.99321616,0.0000011569252,0.0000740412,0.0002663571,0.001590088,0.00039163794,0.000034841,0.0009487058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00008514021,0.99871486,0.00023360645,0.00012222357,0.00007347812,0.00017772324,0.00015005081,0.0000557863,0.00038714494],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956874,0.001031722,0.0012294014,0.0008340595,0.0007841685,0.00043320382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753654,0.00087117054,0.00093322183,0.0005117644,0.0000011098618,0.00014616978],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012742309,0.0006721813,0.0023754716,0.00017436822,0.00009108564,0.000007556322,0.00046296304,0.0004019263,0.00018105692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008850871,0.0005892222,0.00038318647,0.00020565427,0.0009931354,0.00019257372,0.0012226475,0.00041379101,0.00016360384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060850202,0.00040512704,0.0007019756,0.10407274,0.00044495182,0.00008134876,0.0008866494,0.0000025297018,0.00019618576,0.000011175152,0.0017800488,0.8914112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030819027,0.00035707426,0.007667569,0.026493914,0.0009700711,0.00006139493,0.0054100803,0.0000034206646,0.00011067278,0.000027351029,0.9582239,0.0003663697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011790968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022546657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95644385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006201004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061666187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386224646","doi":"10.1002/edn3.469","title":"A nitrifier‐enriched microbial community contributes to the degradation of environmental <scp>DNA</scp>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Mesocosm; Environmental DNA; Biology; Silver carp; Microbial population biology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.013654776893106332,"score_gpt":0.20013661586884154,"score_spread":0.18648183897573523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386224646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959203,0.00011564259,0.000072638366,0.00046619723,0.0002761635,0.0010169516,0.0008012274,0.0001074862,0.0012233738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933842,0.0002602839,0.00043494848,0.000781376,0.00003963877,0.00007449721,0.00036613346,0.000046787194,0.0046121553],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996902,0.00042782098,0.0005449156,0.0005787103,0.000791732,0.0007548254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813366,0.00053173816,0.00024359627,0.00088478666,0.0000013173843,0.00020490652],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008091032,0.0004663472,0.00041848037,0.00012790655,0.0011516018,0.000041469673,0.001102305,0.00017502697,0.00084411615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010197728,0.00041115872,0.00023038882,0.00052283437,0.0013110077,0.00027597253,0.0023666064,0.00048091146,0.010018714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002091062,0.00041649278,0.33910823,0.000008163965,0.0000912822,0.0000071351565,0.0016154988,0.00030782304,0.6264684,0.0000092074015,0.030199325,0.0017475181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078868604,0.00019209312,0.8800845,0.0000115464545,0.00008319064,0.000006790939,0.0062487354,0.000040982482,0.08214451,0.000100989884,0.030103745,0.00019424217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021558099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059161328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5443239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082586013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035500293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386371864","doi":"10.1002/edn3.472","title":"Critical considerations for communicating environmental <scp>DNA</scp> science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; U.S. Department of Commerce; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"CLARITY; Transparency (behavior); Environmental DNA; Workflow; Consistency (knowledge bases); Citizen science; Computer science; Scale (ratio); Knowledge management; Data science; Process management; Environmental resource management; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Computer security; Biology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.02951507677489546,"score_gpt":0.25620093288429907,"score_spread":0.22668585610940362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386371864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99094236,0.00010121546,0.00007004601,0.00057860516,0.00032314446,0.0008796255,0.0006044006,0.00025354407,0.006247054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863936,0.00022332884,0.010827498,0.0007632874,0.00006919894,0.00019152038,0.0001360952,0.000059633196,0.001335883],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599624,0.00010288511,0.0004949737,0.0010978843,0.0010852726,0.0012227563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99694324,0.0015825451,0.00014459435,0.0009231523,0.0000020804928,0.00040437732],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079446414,0.00046523256,0.0003460367,0.00014497052,0.002936166,0.00014228688,0.0008798834,0.00014430442,0.0018079702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005585836,0.0005116259,0.00020679674,0.00034638174,0.0059621474,0.00090799585,0.0026828863,0.00030339585,0.009697418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008084122,0.0005554877,0.35277206,0.000017194736,0.00005076993,0.000033471373,0.0028118773,0.00037933025,0.6143486,0.00041733027,0.027054647,0.0015511728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010326128,0.00029035012,0.897056,0.000019569206,0.00009297582,0.00004573703,0.006302198,0.0013335862,0.06417947,0.002908254,0.026270816,0.00046843023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021126267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000068943964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5501691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010829032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009024139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387519772","doi":"10.1002/edn3.461","title":"How much is enough? Examining the sampling effort necessary to estimate mean <scp>eDNA</scp> concentrations in lentic systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Sépaq; Université Laval; Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Replicate; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Habitat; Sample size determination; Ecology; Statistics; Lake ecosystem; Aggregate (composite); Biology; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0317125309242281,"score_gpt":0.2445661668547536,"score_spread":0.2128536359305255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387519772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956985,0.00020325968,0.00011731081,0.00083824596,0.00038489982,0.0010044436,0.00016243581,0.00012966065,0.0014612206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952022,0.00018939577,0.0006174413,0.00046418273,0.000059182337,0.0001368515,0.00009188164,0.000046165707,0.0031927123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969058,0.000099802244,0.00037604684,0.0008499914,0.00086104125,0.00090733054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987984,0.00026447,0.00013802465,0.00057612045,0.0000011043703,0.0002219174],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043752496,0.00041881364,0.0003262866,0.00009781338,0.00083036034,0.00018671966,0.0006739761,0.000118412434,0.00019648315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047290454,0.0003748028,0.00009538386,0.00050721655,0.0005939891,0.0004846471,0.0012928072,0.00029102425,0.0035336788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037330983,0.00011928776,0.9390254,0.000018537212,0.000054809792,0.000031997544,0.0073319282,0.009959394,0.035100285,0.00003337916,0.0077288304,0.0005924299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044485787,0.00015397118,0.9518643,0.00004584907,0.000043603,0.0000091301545,0.019782439,0.0012930634,0.0060070558,0.000051420273,0.020051628,0.00025268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014686942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010874562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02909323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082897313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033217004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388127877","doi":"10.1002/edn3.485","title":"Seas the DNA? Limited detection of cetaceans by low‐volume environmental DNA transect surveys","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Porpoise; Environmental DNA; Cetacea; Phocoena; Transect; Fishery; Whale; Humpback whale; Balaenoptera; Limiting; Environmental science; Biology; Oceanography; Ecology; Biodiversity; Geology","score_opus":0.008213518523890496,"score_gpt":0.17563191606175688,"score_spread":0.1674183975378664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388127877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99561644,0.00021776167,0.00014819698,0.00035314015,0.0003245101,0.0008898937,0.0012648605,0.00017463494,0.0010105656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99392164,0.0009912921,0.00007484497,0.00022548034,0.000055256103,0.00007107355,0.00044997502,0.00008631803,0.004124144],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532074,0.0006291662,0.00064153987,0.001070177,0.0013677846,0.00097057025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983496,0.00020392702,0.00029344065,0.0008826978,9.575499e-7,0.0002693897],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096561847,0.0006629043,0.0004960524,0.00009972017,0.00086598255,0.000041211468,0.00088885735,0.00025489798,0.005218107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022810122,0.000594767,0.00039112242,0.00046861128,0.0021898563,0.0004657796,0.00095345423,0.00042627947,0.008855329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004195836,0.00042042986,0.315623,0.000014614717,0.00011580706,0.00001758795,0.0009663388,0.00032994084,0.6730691,5.805485e-7,0.0052964566,0.0041042077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008396981,0.0002854979,0.805437,0.00001245524,0.000103090475,0.000011146095,0.0015279457,0.0003716539,0.17797068,0.000023141682,0.01283208,0.0005855986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015725938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000560623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4950984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009164885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003111511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389071193","doi":"10.1002/edn3.488","title":"Beyond life: Louis Bernatchez's (1960–2023) enduring legacy on molecular ecology, conservation, and the science of environmental DNA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Conservation biology; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007801087656279644,"score_gpt":0.1934995132072873,"score_spread":0.18569842555100766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389071193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99238676,0.00015425387,0.0000033901142,0.0016779127,0.00024801877,0.00070799555,0.00018369913,0.00006101725,0.0045769513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969455,0.0005931907,0.00032019435,0.0011577132,0.000033834414,0.000053719257,0.000041217634,0.00003641248,0.000818214],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964507,0.00015192006,0.0004909791,0.000967583,0.0012184205,0.0007203559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851406,0.0002693392,0.00027517922,0.00067564775,0.0000012990145,0.0002644902],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008472327,0.00044266245,0.00041588754,0.00014603364,0.0009394908,0.00007239532,0.00082925864,0.00012976749,0.0017269875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091497895,0.000381219,0.0001517107,0.00038851638,0.009275106,0.00054218434,0.0022772064,0.00031315399,0.002394472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019030471,0.0004352084,0.4439134,0.000018203184,0.00014041434,0.000065398046,0.0019272879,0.00078316784,0.547731,0.00060598756,0.0027312888,0.0014583796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020452396,0.00019320603,0.92250615,0.000013120304,0.00007792826,0.0000147289165,0.002243926,0.00024561703,0.069834486,0.0006488123,0.001743301,0.0004334887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013809076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008761136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47859275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000597733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008625713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389085122","doi":"10.1002/edn3.494","title":"Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> biomonitoring in biodiversity hotspots: A case study of fishes of the Okavango Delta","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK; Royal Society","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Biodiversity hotspot; Fauna; Delta","score_opus":0.016630900886639686,"score_gpt":0.20908323129882278,"score_spread":0.1924523304121831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389085122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99784136,0.00007444921,5.810537e-7,0.00004130465,0.0003154371,0.0009560246,0.0004760932,0.000045516495,0.00024921307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999319,0.00019390332,0.000096794676,0.000048094353,0.00002481836,0.00002849473,0.000017925307,0.0000245552,0.00024642635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679893,0.0002205426,0.00059291406,0.0007659062,0.0010063429,0.00061539083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985186,0.00021559025,0.00034621145,0.00077738526,8.682461e-7,0.00014135154],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037223854,0.00043166665,0.0004566746,0.00016649264,0.0004331184,0.000014474264,0.0008156877,0.00014726144,0.0003590642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000321012,0.00039077993,0.0002130165,0.0006219811,0.0012947397,0.00034384255,0.0030894878,0.00027728267,0.00070507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011665269,0.0013149796,0.9316791,0.000014472939,0.0000684568,0.0003466297,0.0085227005,0.0004310428,0.055419862,2.0931624e-7,0.0015250223,0.00066581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012138946,0.0002962751,0.912795,0.000018612624,0.000076102515,0.00006785578,0.063214496,0.000037151094,0.021543171,0.000009369329,0.0005531112,0.0001749516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022020112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034648128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0546918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006945701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029545313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389390904","doi":"10.1002/edn3.493","title":"Permafrost microbial communities follow shifts in vegetation, soils, and megafauna extinctions in Late Pleistocene NW North America","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MaRS; University of Alberta; McMaster University; Tula Foundation; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Belmont Forum","keywords":"Megafauna; Ecology; Permafrost; Holocene; Pleistocene; Steppe; Vegetation (pathology); Beringia; Ecosystem; Biology; Paleontology; Arctic","score_opus":0.010594135923395562,"score_gpt":0.20346477881885,"score_spread":0.19287064289545444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389390904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981501,0.00003161935,0.0000019091742,0.00022612976,0.000094340605,0.00021671302,0.00010024682,0.000033051994,0.0011458499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981296,0.00021978523,0.00005912007,0.00045786382,0.000013018127,0.000036190744,0.00077567005,0.000017996306,0.00029074118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987831,0.00030461664,0.00025628207,0.00021719666,0.00008232113,0.00035644433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947554,0.00013221415,0.000064423875,0.0002649382,6.063145e-7,0.000062290885],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015222626,0.00017654063,0.00021153339,0.00010587603,0.00031327546,0.000013532294,0.0002453338,0.000095054536,0.0030631954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000082978295,0.00020029827,0.00003929496,0.0002778538,0.0006380014,0.00014620637,0.0005027428,0.0003737495,0.0010146691],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011519307,0.00043754987,0.8700153,0.000016945352,0.000019877407,0.000036203786,0.017283814,0.0146909915,0.09162335,0.000012186146,0.0012014464,0.0045471364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061936205,0.00009006074,0.9933577,0.000008038603,0.000006102808,0.0000028433142,0.000818938,0.0007854514,0.00013381217,0.00025654733,0.00371791,0.00020322418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019352469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07695392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1233424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019626034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059124036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389728181","doi":"10.1002/edn3.503","title":"Development of novel LAMP and qPCR assays for rapid and specific identification of Bronze birch borer (<i>Agrilus anxius</i>)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Canadian Forest Service; Kungl. Skogs- och Lantbruksakademien; Università degli Studi di Padova; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Biology; Agrilus; Frass; Botany; PEST analysis; Larva","score_opus":0.014731890140112194,"score_gpt":0.21212582646104824,"score_spread":0.19739393632093605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389728181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99775565,0.000077976016,0.0007946392,0.000055207925,0.000101902464,0.00048437648,0.000047660254,0.000018727409,0.0006638623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99550825,0.00026852585,0.0032839607,0.000036903817,0.000011593576,0.00006404976,0.00007126677,0.00001513603,0.0007403133],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890685,0.000017309785,0.00035050497,0.00032265333,0.00019711096,0.00020555084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956816,0.000052887866,0.00014504553,0.00017813711,0.0000012128457,0.000054580196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004341254,0.0001266396,0.0001554139,0.00006175822,0.00012347038,0.000007909281,0.00011883934,0.00006617705,0.00031854556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008329353,0.00012581781,0.000031673906,0.00011326403,0.00035448364,0.00011472352,0.00028434608,0.00004747714,0.00007015552],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050533825,0.0002703646,0.021241525,0.00005947521,0.00003947929,0.0000011080857,0.0015933592,0.00011030818,0.9560621,0.00052658544,0.0017844281,0.018260745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007462306,0.00007836844,0.91041356,0.000007537868,0.000015657994,0.0000028236573,0.00036695448,0.0003075689,0.064950615,0.00018997332,0.022775372,0.00014535645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008541999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022331084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8911115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007499963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035515834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51307017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390012933","doi":"10.1002/edn3.495","title":"Rethinking trophic interactions in agricultural landscapes through tracking secondary feeding","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Agricultural Research Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Predation; Biology; Predator; Generalist and specialist species; Biological pest control; Ecology; Arthropod mouthparts; Trophic level; Habitat","score_opus":0.048990458214961084,"score_gpt":0.21815271083876936,"score_spread":0.16916225262380827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390012933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954475,0.00014207499,5.1177196e-8,0.00085957604,0.000088205634,0.00007028049,0.000043185773,0.00008633137,0.003262804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900466,0.00020885763,0.000013488957,0.0000748467,0.00021627962,0.00001043045,0.00010716082,8.974465e-7,0.0003633792],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999265,0.000024904595,0.00014044631,0.00020339395,0.00012498412,0.0002412382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998185,0.00010258703,0.00003959056,0.000011419107,0.0000011923153,0.000026682208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007431273,0.000111425106,0.00011945477,0.000010585334,0.00026129393,0.00004049433,0.00010306813,0.00003285029,0.00038598673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007928233,0.000044182594,0.00006358672,0.0001867162,0.000026317448,0.0002564157,0.000095724514,0.00017917104,0.00021256588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008848378,0.000032461736,0.03824057,0.0000025804388,0.000009613104,0.000022346,0.0011730146,0.0000073454116,0.95240974,0.000042094125,0.0004912579,0.0075601162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007583625,0.000036391433,0.98666143,0.000029158635,0.000003894935,0.0000122598485,0.002825776,0.00002246839,0.0037536852,0.0005088823,0.0059365337,0.00013365732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005928125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012547257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9486561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042258536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":6.406108e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4226284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390398509","doi":"10.1002/edn3.508","title":"Enumeration potential of environmental <scp>DNA</scp> for Pacific salmon stock assessments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Genome British Columbia","keywords":"Oncorhynchus; Chinook wind; Juvenile; Fishery; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology","score_opus":0.012588114187794444,"score_gpt":0.22450834155227165,"score_spread":0.2119202273644772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390398509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99444634,0.00007836858,0.00038386902,0.00006771174,0.0004422842,0.0012624596,0.0013197495,0.00012998309,0.0018692117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911649,0.00032212338,0.0020658395,0.0000891763,0.00009054175,0.00015268713,0.00083872187,0.00007695285,0.0051990133],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996338,0.00011554787,0.00060390134,0.0009914812,0.0011074343,0.0008436322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866223,0.00018008248,0.00034721877,0.00057614426,0.0000012434963,0.00023306631],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037408186,0.000532375,0.0004517779,0.00013256854,0.00059217174,0.000039991453,0.00054214837,0.00022690483,0.001518162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023288012,0.0005823138,0.00032960685,0.00022612323,0.00086212816,0.00055116,0.0009838814,0.0002092599,0.0036137325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032250708,0.000527463,0.33169517,0.000022171136,0.000109436616,0.000017247445,0.0005571269,0.0006578946,0.65000826,0.0000063592743,0.011681631,0.0046850103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001357763,0.0005529703,0.9126053,0.000013656239,0.00012540966,0.000010335353,0.0030927812,0.0011387862,0.06742264,0.00018035428,0.0131885195,0.00031146678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020327825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024784053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5825856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007703325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003923804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390617206","doi":"10.1002/edn3.505","title":"<scp>eDNA</scp> metabarcoding as a means to track distributions of different fish species in a protected area","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Electrofishing; Trout; Environmental DNA; Biology; Fishery; Fishing; Population; National park; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.015281764035386832,"score_gpt":0.20559395705171754,"score_spread":0.1903121930163307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390617206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918369,0.00013544719,0.0001822649,0.00033808628,0.00014791467,0.00093475124,0.001185794,0.000090354355,0.0051485063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960179,0.00017944268,0.0008652171,0.00012556321,0.000025781794,0.00012204839,0.00011235591,0.000030904655,0.0025207845],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974458,0.00008804205,0.00043482988,0.00075792783,0.0006972655,0.00057611964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917847,0.00016683216,0.00007461865,0.00036498698,9.0664616e-7,0.00021418616],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016600154,0.0003973624,0.00038569458,0.00013460779,0.00019002905,0.000049993894,0.00040937934,0.00010654292,0.002265307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081496204,0.00037491063,0.00020172654,0.00040259387,0.00058327615,0.00029806932,0.0008971185,0.00030407755,0.0011409292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020423175,0.0010148275,0.51163226,0.00006774702,0.00018086041,0.000102930455,0.0055782488,0.00040719652,0.47030556,0.0002007951,0.008635531,0.0018535997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031934868,0.0003046998,0.86941004,0.00008788921,0.000062362866,0.000012061786,0.0019540899,0.00010948298,0.09880883,0.0002281234,0.028496321,0.00020673372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000083955594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014319757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3714967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011070268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031245036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391219343","doi":"10.1002/edn3.329","title":"Cover Image","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.010621418286544924,"score_gpt":0.2097170031073078,"score_spread":0.19909558482076287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391219343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091951355,0.0004734046,0.000038541064,0.00027167087,0.0036047092,0.0010182046,0.0031006625,0.0002172501,0.8993242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012015997,0.003912144,0.0014158358,0.00074872706,0.00036119687,0.000103056955,0.0018895646,0.00024328473,0.9793102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958082,0.00011138175,0.0004907645,0.001413975,0.0012056172,0.0009700666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983853,0.0000999138,0.00029160632,0.0009310105,7.20142e-7,0.0002914595],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018249436,0.00089557056,0.0006519141,0.00009630551,0.00051621173,0.00007395865,0.00097190746,0.0005225751,0.34555936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015699216,0.00094079383,0.0003851895,0.00021299087,0.001566303,0.00034754266,0.0031991887,0.0006875765,0.9508189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016546075,0.0001657292,0.0031618127,0.000023089831,0.000102560625,0.000070114016,0.00017232276,0.00015191134,0.013256921,5.403336e-7,0.9823315,0.00054691406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048314754,0.0001150049,0.08719641,0.00003586795,0.00009939064,0.000011304341,0.00016228491,0.000016564916,0.0041243196,0.00002529488,0.9066204,0.001110035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015060301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000065250865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60525954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017414149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039725655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391854619","doi":"10.1002/edn3.517","title":"<scp>eDNA</scp> metabarcoding reveals riverine fish community structure and climate associations in northeastern Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Ontario Forest Research Institute; Dalhousie University; Yukon Department of Environment; Government of Newfoundland and Labrador; Natural Resources Canada; Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fish <Actinopterygii>; Community structure; Geography; Ecology; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.009639766493133146,"score_gpt":0.19514534186530574,"score_spread":0.1855055753721726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391854619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99515045,0.00032094942,0.0000021351968,0.00017711865,0.00017976828,0.00027447526,0.0024355596,0.000042544405,0.0014169917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981873,0.0003307072,0.00034720296,0.00042303017,0.000024590117,0.000010396825,0.00017711395,0.000025968942,0.00047371534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981154,0.00018696966,0.00028637418,0.00043040133,0.00047606626,0.00050479284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992478,0.00024932096,0.00007549309,0.0002788692,5.383551e-7,0.0001479869],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025434347,0.00029806912,0.0002693132,0.000049867816,0.00052972947,0.000059961527,0.00028076075,0.0000867901,0.00047304484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033747918,0.00030960626,0.0000568291,0.00015733147,0.00035192692,0.00036384648,0.0011740553,0.00051728415,0.0001197494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013342312,0.000054323853,0.9841899,0.000023350794,0.000047808757,0.000034606466,0.0012615675,0.00014897739,0.01161338,0.000008455001,0.0018565158,0.0007597658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023068541,0.00004800204,0.98843193,0.000026346748,0.00004012934,0.000011722953,0.0015116776,0.00010702013,0.0013371008,0.00008531377,0.00802115,0.00014892002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057721496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2908438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2331223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013904445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000503136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392710158","doi":"10.1002/edn3.524","title":"<scp>DNA</scp> from dives: Species detection of humpback whales (<i>Megaptera novaeangliae</i>) from flukeprint <scp>eDNA</scp>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Raincoast Conservation Foundation; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Humpback whale; Fishery; Environmental DNA; Whale; Habitat; Biology; Porpoise; Whaling; Invasive species; Population; Cetacea; Geography; Ecology; Biodiversity; Harbour","score_opus":0.010904406975507252,"score_gpt":0.1866070781015608,"score_spread":0.17570267112605353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392710158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98482007,0.002438637,0.0003302745,0.000054426615,0.0009944066,0.000598941,0.0023568922,0.00023316078,0.00817319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912664,0.0015751115,0.002279743,0.00022450453,0.00029672447,0.000044670174,0.0003410505,0.00009570971,0.0038760765],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538314,0.00015857168,0.0007484022,0.0015967126,0.0012796996,0.0008334491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977068,0.0007964734,0.0002743542,0.0009048513,0.0000027208996,0.0003148314],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022896315,0.00080724293,0.0006427903,0.0001303532,0.0004579742,0.00015858312,0.0008834705,0.00032451627,0.002567915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092037364,0.0008214807,0.00044902763,0.000287085,0.0017766176,0.0008828983,0.0021777805,0.00054512464,0.0102444505],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074675645,0.00035419746,0.30734542,0.000026134205,0.00033343502,0.000063302556,0.004798555,0.00014345988,0.679169,0.000015794263,0.0045337416,0.0032094922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043925838,0.00021584792,0.5866985,0.00007139972,0.00015099737,0.0000057518578,0.0052878386,0.000110665715,0.34953383,0.00048778602,0.056820482,0.00017765153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007973666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017365538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3296352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011091183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005189285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392731740","doi":"10.1002/edn3.511","title":"High‐volume plankton tow net sampling improves <scp>eDNA</scp> detection of invasive zebra mussels (<i>Dreissena polymorpha</i>) in recently infested lakes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Dreissena; Plankton; Biology; Environmental DNA; Sampling (signal processing); Invasive species; Ecology; Bivalvia; Fishery; Mollusca; Biodiversity; Filter (signal processing)","score_opus":0.008857011650294197,"score_gpt":0.1937991041382929,"score_spread":0.1849420924879987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392731740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961953,0.0011143532,0.00006578843,0.00009452204,0.0005739727,0.0006627218,0.00037017697,0.00012900696,0.000794115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634296,0.0009409665,0.00093817606,0.00018075678,0.00008201743,0.000047254893,0.00014489987,0.00006129075,0.0012616883],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968125,0.00012932821,0.00063654716,0.00099344,0.00071177696,0.00071635854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988346,0.00031630672,0.00020928986,0.00044552243,0.0000014857036,0.00019277478],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028446157,0.00053171045,0.0004716783,0.00019649716,0.00023488145,0.000073503084,0.0004487875,0.00024705715,0.0008971962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075620264,0.0005554188,0.00018155399,0.00041276574,0.0008049658,0.0007682789,0.00082033826,0.00043995868,0.0015359233],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019362253,0.00023610928,0.23562771,0.00005507664,0.000082188795,0.000041893934,0.0012824698,0.0004897651,0.7553001,0.000008444252,0.00069716474,0.0061596846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055846485,0.0004227234,0.7067686,0.00009393629,0.00006287414,0.000022474718,0.0014391195,0.00010806483,0.2837648,0.0001500917,0.006338408,0.00027047723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006653262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047504323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47153533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010234913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000078800995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392888377","doi":"10.1002/edn3.529","title":"Oomycete communities are influenced by land use and disease status in Christmas tree production in Southern Québec, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant Pathogens and Resistance","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation","keywords":"Oomycete; Phytophthora; Species richness; Biodiversity; Phytophthora cinnamomi; Threatened species; Context (archaeology); Geography; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Botany","score_opus":0.007295566227947975,"score_gpt":0.1559182192216505,"score_spread":0.14862265299370253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392888377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99428666,0.0036783658,1.5503597e-8,0.00066553766,0.00003389867,0.00009093979,0.0012221687,0.000009593054,0.000012816875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998637,0.0005173137,0.0000018755151,0.00008102856,0.0000188802,0.000009744208,0.00016501833,8.84735e-7,0.0005682506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994904,0.000043051605,0.00009002078,0.00013852492,0.00009344004,0.00014457821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998271,0.00004458666,0.00001797152,0.00003246947,6.403491e-7,0.000077262055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000036217192,0.00007985396,0.00007279179,0.0000071445925,0.000059109887,0.000037169582,0.00004665388,0.000021185051,0.00004310049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007876464,0.0000350205,0.000011357361,0.000051721247,0.000056650217,0.00009220812,0.000029098856,0.00007979531,0.0000033104973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002631144,0.000028864455,0.8897586,0.0000098382025,0.0000026779646,0.000047423382,0.00019098869,0.00001427898,0.10591127,4.6642313e-7,0.0005389863,0.003470313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054843105,0.000011606466,0.97541356,0.00005322553,0.0000026867815,0.0000016824325,0.0018069956,0.000040260547,0.00018018925,0.000007162132,0.022332411,0.000095394935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63076293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98341113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35264823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001042364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013955957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37169588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393933133","doi":"10.1002/edn3.544","title":"Correction to “<scp>eDNA</scp> metabarcoding reveals riverine fish community structure and climate associations in northeastern Canada”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fish <Actinopterygii>; Community structure; Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.009171072142049132,"score_gpt":0.1998328350708495,"score_spread":0.19066176292880038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393933133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961792,0.00012035947,0.0000071062527,0.0002015442,0.00057250203,0.0003377476,0.0013599747,0.000044962744,0.0011765589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979753,0.00013566943,0.00031912504,0.0005562128,0.00002922544,0.000014129001,0.00012691019,0.000023674782,0.00081978267],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982703,0.00016734049,0.000259815,0.00042407372,0.00043189098,0.0004465771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926955,0.0002565149,0.000060903563,0.00024094842,6.8588434e-7,0.00017141609],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024388779,0.00026648678,0.00023612371,0.00006501306,0.0005153594,0.000058447422,0.0002240744,0.00006539268,0.00032286005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058183454,0.0002852521,0.000048457823,0.00020089735,0.00018802255,0.00030484924,0.0009906259,0.0004618243,0.00016040525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022864533,0.00005182723,0.97003365,0.000013797313,0.000034918772,0.000017620672,0.0017609921,0.0004652174,0.019424386,0.0000028671393,0.006642229,0.0015501924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016482515,0.000074315154,0.9882214,0.000036255886,0.000032559776,0.000011277286,0.0016288947,0.00018716008,0.002269477,0.000027882083,0.007201824,0.00014414807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06864354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3954068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32676327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017391143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045798715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394825760","doi":"10.1002/edn3.530","title":"Quantifying the effect of water quality on eDNA degradation using microcosm and bioassay experiments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Microcosm; Bioassay; Phosphorus; Environmental chemistry; Degradation (telecommunications); Water quality; Chlorophyll a; Dissolved organic carbon; Biology; Chlorophyll; Environmental science; Ecology; Chemistry; Botany","score_opus":0.035385113562606055,"score_gpt":0.28252797574420535,"score_spread":0.2471428621815993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394825760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99832386,0.0004451528,0.000034167486,0.00010984837,0.00018353865,0.00039136602,0.000041347685,0.000025068766,0.00044566448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917257,0.0000791436,0.0003314007,0.00006965738,0.000021245465,0.00001323525,0.000022468834,0.00002000049,0.00027025136],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838245,0.00019641613,0.00024757834,0.00046851058,0.00042480516,0.00028022364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994806,0.00014543353,0.000053425567,0.00026187408,2.6868307e-7,0.000058366677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004507973,0.00025394285,0.00019982044,0.000036369885,0.0003955875,0.00005125085,0.00018407719,0.000068620335,0.0006865394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000070870346,0.00015380692,0.00009515566,0.00005958211,0.0009771738,0.00021543867,0.00054108124,0.00014479565,0.00060398784],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032247317,0.000037960126,0.24883182,0.00002285798,0.000039069226,0.0000044721264,0.00077307085,0.000054310778,0.7473901,0.000006435923,0.00010317361,0.002704467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025693985,0.00020604765,0.2097466,0.00003139525,0.000046333214,0.0000064241635,0.00034204707,0.00015669131,0.7868701,0.000008885613,0.002142498,0.00018600497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018654672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004774408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039480012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000349824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":5.742337e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77632433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396706846","doi":"10.1002/edn3.553","title":"Monitoring and predicting the presence and abundance of juvenile Atlantic salmon in tributaries according to habitat characteristics using environmental <scp>DNA</scp>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tributary; Juvenile; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Fishery; Environmental science; Environmental DNA; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Biodiversity; Cartography","score_opus":0.011465423682303326,"score_gpt":0.21279152739312088,"score_spread":0.20132610371081755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396706846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99749166,0.0013287257,0.00003870375,0.00008615879,0.00026224778,0.00052972324,0.00015165488,0.00003393836,0.000077187244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973376,0.0010604017,0.0013443942,0.00003269071,0.00006454533,0.000023670176,0.000011881836,0.000034613913,0.00009023188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774843,0.00008852586,0.0004435047,0.0007019771,0.0005070947,0.00051045924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990107,0.00044392605,0.00012408404,0.000272245,4.944087e-7,0.000148566],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003617208,0.00035119546,0.0003530649,0.000076873235,0.00039547402,0.00009775567,0.00028974214,0.00009708488,0.000046725818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006397178,0.00031661856,0.0000618385,0.00016179962,0.001037438,0.00051359343,0.0014957973,0.00029287394,0.0000739708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007805247,0.000055652763,0.82204044,0.00003867909,0.000024209445,0.000028830775,0.003286233,0.00012347488,0.1725177,0.0000029239375,0.000028859682,0.0018451931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021498153,0.000102423364,0.97260314,0.00019890614,0.00005827846,0.00003895307,0.007866983,0.0010306176,0.017018106,0.00003297729,0.0006660126,0.00016861681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019649719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012246005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15549959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051893364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030831675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399774982","doi":"10.1002/edn3.578","title":"Systematic evaluation of the influence of Taq enzyme choice and amplification conditions on targeted environmental DNA assay performance and detection in field samples","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"DNA; Computational biology; Chromatography; Molecular biology; Environmental science; Chemistry; Biology; Biochemistry","score_opus":0.012059712438315119,"score_gpt":0.21881307400058345,"score_spread":0.20675336156226834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399774982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998361,0.00037506124,0.000009209524,0.000059739377,0.00006989251,0.0008693924,0.00010892867,0.000012665633,0.00013410459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940115,0.00031694796,0.00005286665,0.000054989807,0.00000797385,0.0000762951,0.000018816108,0.00001198547,0.00005895531],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981297,0.00023474998,0.00038717594,0.00040317385,0.000671187,0.00017399614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999181,0.0003219621,0.00016862463,0.00028109402,0.0000011032705,0.00004622908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060127414,0.00019946892,0.00021582433,0.00007321568,0.00017704502,0.00001590724,0.00016012341,0.00009006825,0.000260097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008572021,0.0001669479,0.00005160903,0.00013067697,0.0006214962,0.00032130972,0.00026095618,0.00016019594,0.00006878266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011408075,0.00013228644,0.5339671,0.0004241617,0.000038323924,4.431206e-7,0.000962758,0.0028744652,0.4601858,0.000009468687,0.00002260182,0.0013711902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026461642,0.00012832125,0.89985466,0.00039151247,0.000103098464,0.0000057277844,0.00044822562,0.0018312717,0.09673952,0.000053037948,0.000036890196,0.00014313389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010493151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003932804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36588755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046160424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000267163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68079376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399861094","doi":"10.1002/edn3.568","title":"Metal ions limit or enhance environmental <scp>DNA</scp> detectability in marine sediments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Université du Québec à Rimouski","keywords":"Metal ions in aqueous solution; Limit (mathematics); Metal; Ion; Environmental DNA; DNA; Detection limit; Environmental chemistry; Environmental science; Chemistry; Oceanography; Nanotechnology; Materials science; Geology; Ecology; Biology; Chromatography; Metallurgy; Biochemistry; Biodiversity; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009851273120672422,"score_gpt":0.21145312382388182,"score_spread":0.2016018507032094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399861094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917804,0.00050715584,0.000024516097,0.00014799727,0.00056694803,0.0009733932,0.00040614864,0.00020103766,0.0053923763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98781294,0.0008537489,0.002071306,0.00033312,0.0000936015,0.00015879724,0.00017477169,0.00009344097,0.0084082885],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484384,0.00021142678,0.00074538524,0.0017948083,0.0012038344,0.0012007108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998273,0.00038353057,0.00013313643,0.0008192982,5.125604e-7,0.0003904896],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047927554,0.0008264348,0.000567883,0.000162637,0.00042658165,0.00009603818,0.00078263896,0.0002789997,0.01587572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004885138,0.0007735138,0.00032281954,0.00039172996,0.0014643555,0.000933788,0.0027763923,0.0006858634,0.014936224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042111686,0.0012365796,0.71598595,0.000040495215,0.00015621596,0.00040889112,0.0015394567,0.00016230912,0.26744452,0.000006177097,0.0024700419,0.010507267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072968326,0.0003865132,0.85236543,0.000040727216,0.000121682504,0.00006201421,0.0015849553,0.00022750914,0.106254,0.00018274543,0.03755217,0.0004925947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014784899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013714716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16119052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027522186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008324396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400615168","doi":"10.1002/edn3.586","title":"Detection differences between eDNA and mid‐water trawls are driven by fish biomass and habitat preferences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Tula Foundation; McGill University","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biomass (ecology); Fishery; Environmental science; Fish habitat; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.010665226961129811,"score_gpt":0.18382263172606164,"score_spread":0.17315740476493183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400615168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99762774,0.00057500374,0.000029731249,0.00046515086,0.00014713766,0.00030092124,0.00039884608,0.000088322115,0.0003671472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817866,0.0007372505,0.00015782421,0.000088468994,0.000045547586,0.000027536837,0.00006120082,0.000023004015,0.0006805249],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809,0.00007548264,0.00022663393,0.00079459004,0.00040114453,0.00041210375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995132,0.00008282039,0.00005004457,0.0001710341,4.0659577e-7,0.0001825127],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010879948,0.00034933724,0.00026768105,0.00005010422,0.00040265184,0.0001346803,0.00018941231,0.00012466943,0.0007020675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000044444205,0.00027518,0.00006136463,0.000064853506,0.0011920684,0.00047980424,0.00066010194,0.00019045982,0.0005323562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067185324,0.000042106076,0.8144637,0.000026151303,0.00005652713,0.00000906355,0.0006313873,6.223363e-7,0.1730924,1.8556982e-7,0.0010370563,0.010634137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002093794,0.0001717964,0.8975985,0.000028145547,0.00007575307,0.000008880224,0.000576585,0.000030259409,0.09607552,0.00011641373,0.0047485717,0.0003601695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000101424856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000087850894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083134875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022876957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":6.003836e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400926086","doi":"10.1002/edn3.590","title":"Enhancing metabarcoding of freshwater biotic communities: A new online tool for primer selection and exploring data from 14 primer pairs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"3M (Canada); Parks Canada; York University; St. Lawrence River Institute of Environmental Sciences; McGill University; Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Primer (cosmetics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Biology; Computational biology; Ecology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Chemistry","score_opus":0.06966734139842891,"score_gpt":0.24924167534915326,"score_spread":0.17957433395072436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400926086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952902,0.001153424,0.0013395688,0.00010851151,0.00022356502,0.0004539932,0.0013163586,0.00006624485,0.00004812485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559185,0.00094999134,0.041712627,0.000082553284,0.00009832367,0.00001954972,0.0007031936,0.00004220402,0.00047304612],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983414,0.00006112039,0.00034369246,0.00057237176,0.0003479653,0.00033349372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911714,0.00023255202,0.000078228324,0.0004746628,7.6387704e-7,0.00009668181],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002314588,0.00028673024,0.0002818881,0.000060268994,0.0002578023,0.000044982455,0.0004000275,0.00007534607,0.002276601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017025535,0.00027775866,0.00008053364,0.00009115563,0.0003439735,0.0010367549,0.0015722426,0.0001914445,0.00019578006],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055168497,0.00023873379,0.3905031,0.000076312295,0.00033577025,0.000004818276,0.004418083,0.000098640725,0.5939022,0.000008083836,0.0022266884,0.008132413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014233945,0.00039587868,0.5186945,0.00033787044,0.0007392424,0.000014526868,0.008272627,0.006354335,0.3967169,0.00022496747,0.065660164,0.0011655674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001756092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058251387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1971853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027627134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000039763177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402413872","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70006","title":"Development of <scp>eDNA</scp> Protocols for Detection of Endangered White Sturgeon (<i>Acipenser transmontanus</i>) in the Wild","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada); Government of British Columbia; University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Victoria; BC Hydro (Canada)","funders":"Ministry of Environment; BC Hydro; Genome British Columbia","keywords":"Sturgeon; Endangered species; Acipenser; White (mutation); Fishery; Biology; Zoology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Habitat; Genetics; Gene","score_opus":0.01648178912467737,"score_gpt":0.22456625892252183,"score_spread":0.20808446979784445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402413872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991386,0.00015394948,0.0007257573,0.00004738981,0.00008673848,0.006558554,0.00017009312,0.000025241625,0.0008463024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99227893,0.000032894906,0.005047644,0.00006425328,0.000016564783,0.0021943385,0.000030148258,0.000025281064,0.0003099545],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979492,0.000076831304,0.00051801756,0.00048430223,0.00060884585,0.0003628089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935544,0.00016684989,0.0001313458,0.00029109893,0.0000010183305,0.000054263273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049756235,0.0002785323,0.000283367,0.00007516024,0.00016111284,0.000018895129,0.00035833867,0.000107226355,0.00016858299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014953005,0.00022609708,0.0001628728,0.000202632,0.00044132172,0.00024153602,0.00019670888,0.00017217558,0.00010756844],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005832601,0.00067487865,0.18999197,0.00021357018,0.00011273863,0.00001040214,0.025419768,0.00015633636,0.7566845,0.000010677567,0.0007457177,0.025921157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005777,0.00032747127,0.619861,0.000076861674,0.000039831582,0.0000062267018,0.0037933325,0.00008354901,0.32322785,0.0000651482,0.051807456,0.00013356413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022250644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014952087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4334566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043098623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047603125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92199713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402992801","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70019","title":"Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Detects Predators at Higher Rates Than Electrofishing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Electrofishing; Environmental DNA; Predation; Environmental science; Fishery; Biology; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.010092145885942864,"score_gpt":0.20054053474285977,"score_spread":0.1904483888569169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402992801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886722,0.002230001,0.000028092074,0.00030454455,0.00078669604,0.00063713646,0.0003069409,0.00033973518,0.0066946535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98705953,0.0008713689,0.0009929609,0.0003818106,0.00017984897,0.000078498495,0.00016474444,0.00013316446,0.010138062],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99517465,0.00017576801,0.0005421204,0.0016310505,0.0012270411,0.0012493567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998599,0.00016865841,0.00013949092,0.00068253675,4.0944172e-7,0.00040992256],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003537804,0.0008426831,0.00048363555,0.00012568972,0.00096244144,0.00018407228,0.0007445607,0.0002507895,0.023981333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011796626,0.0008315251,0.0003972726,0.00024396197,0.0011109001,0.0011796888,0.002400925,0.00053247984,0.020017253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000440107,0.00019908517,0.37837318,0.000023476581,0.00021341021,0.00017407912,0.00073092675,0.00006916195,0.61035633,0.000024499594,0.0061586965,0.0036331592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005396479,0.00022234253,0.6547302,0.000042744436,0.00020748611,0.00006899289,0.00042351647,0.00019307873,0.2561691,0.00015109664,0.08614084,0.0011109234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006493029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023212884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3541872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033525424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037896425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403358825","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70027","title":"Multi‐Environment Quantification of Parasite and Intermediate Host <scp>DNA</scp> on Pasture for Fine‐Scale Disease Risk Assessment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Parasite hosting; Host (biology); Pasture; Scale (ratio); DNA; Biology; Computational biology; Disease; Genetics; Computer science; Ecology; Medicine; Geography; World Wide Web; Pathology; Cartography","score_opus":0.010785715406380977,"score_gpt":0.2347270890308553,"score_spread":0.2239413736244743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403358825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941478,0.00057445734,0.0014632365,0.00019886658,0.00027949503,0.0011245153,0.0018866736,0.000065980086,0.00025898436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906771,0.00152946,0.00559973,0.000114786904,0.000055645814,0.00017497476,0.00024258312,0.000054373355,0.0015513547],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731874,0.00010689037,0.00042787136,0.0010703114,0.00061048847,0.00046569892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986738,0.0003100287,0.00020212094,0.00052045233,0.000001078758,0.00029254382],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000315282,0.0004567082,0.00032858364,0.00007960576,0.0003344696,0.00005904509,0.000300504,0.00012320609,0.00038943868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035964073,0.00042808283,0.00020654363,0.00008568247,0.0009843189,0.0003115448,0.0005700796,0.00026763833,0.0008228876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041734078,0.00075985224,0.8786209,0.0000867605,0.00011331276,0.00001540067,0.0008855736,0.000676227,0.11138481,0.000019813051,0.0027419413,0.0046536317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006917832,0.0003402252,0.9680617,0.000059704915,0.00019536083,0.0000019959698,0.00057165034,0.002241735,0.012025109,0.00007587952,0.015511609,0.0002232752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025857451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010774781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0993597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056597934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035218845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403359691","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70022","title":"<scp>V9</scp> Hypervariable Region Metabarcoding Primers for Euglenozoa and Metamonada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Protist diversity and phylogeny","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Grantová Agentura České Republiky","keywords":"Hypervariable region; Biology; Genetics; Gene","score_opus":0.010289476160394776,"score_gpt":0.1961162352438078,"score_spread":0.18582675908341303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403359691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988138,0.008240471,0.0019270865,0.00005662312,0.00019264592,0.00028577188,0.000111523994,0.000015835381,0.001032046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923688,0.00067970855,0.0019861665,0.00014966987,0.0001250007,0.000023422017,0.0001560482,0.00001973539,0.00449141],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993127,0.000022316783,0.00008176308,0.00032487136,0.00007495747,0.00018338111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997487,0.000026549127,0.000020454592,0.00013374712,0.0000014975815,0.00006904448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009749128,0.00011978765,0.00009513949,0.000022317472,0.00011478675,0.000031686086,0.00009152322,0.00008685775,0.000014242814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016223576,0.00012087199,0.00007694372,0.000025488049,0.00008083777,0.000009188303,0.00012909748,0.00005766705,0.00001696208],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012728212,0.0000360224,0.0043714265,0.000054423035,0.00018068498,0.0000120876375,0.00009223956,0.0000119445485,0.9865541,0.00039058193,0.0054713404,0.0028124123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036627008,0.00018655407,0.0075940182,0.0000132803325,0.00012774825,0.000039986757,0.00020416403,0.00016247365,0.49429628,0.00032796024,0.49656507,0.000116189854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010103908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013637555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4922578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019156978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010124761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49290168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403543081","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70012","title":"Interlaboratory Evaluation of <i>Bretziella fagacearum</i> Molecular Detection Assays to Guide the <scp>eDNA</scp> Monitoring of Oak Wilt Disease","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and Fungal Interactions Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; Michigan Department of Natural Resources; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Wilt disease; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.012584339906389377,"score_gpt":0.2855804357897637,"score_spread":0.27299609588337437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403543081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954797,0.0025616803,0.00057361514,0.00003860541,0.00026916302,0.0002484822,0.0001438548,0.000006539426,0.00067836646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990914,0.00014557036,0.000052001546,0.00002707039,0.00011012704,0.000043579832,0.00006207736,0.000017294653,0.0004508774],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989233,0.00013557167,0.00018554571,0.0002313799,0.00038693548,0.00013723818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995665,0.000036608177,0.000039737664,0.00025570087,0.000025640129,0.0000758326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042464831,0.00010286417,0.00007533692,0.000061724175,0.000043246146,0.000020922094,0.0001488922,0.000059162914,0.000019526819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001279443,0.00008677345,0.000083646606,0.0000999331,0.000066509645,0.000009929801,0.00011758459,0.000108556684,0.000034134722],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015070673,0.00004004891,0.0017426299,0.000017775576,0.00006967421,0.0000024624653,0.00007200155,0.0005216149,0.9906869,0.0000044046283,0.00077922863,0.0060482062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009744603,0.0001691213,0.008389479,0.00003981502,0.000053020613,0.0000036909153,0.00037410893,0.00090114144,0.966315,0.000015165728,0.02360395,0.000038066508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008079924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033979393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024371888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007258038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043553886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35385185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404146798","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70028","title":"Mapping Biodiversity Coast‐to‐Coast‐to‐Coast Across Canada's Three Oceans Using eDNA Metabarcoding","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Marine biodiversity; Fishery; Oceanography; Environmental DNA; Ecology; Geology; Biology","score_opus":0.021650347563009407,"score_gpt":0.2203057288234783,"score_spread":0.1986553812604689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404146798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933211,0.00029027983,0.0010233478,0.00092899014,0.0010058603,0.00083107647,0.002053759,0.00016806771,0.00037752435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98997957,0.00007830288,0.007528857,0.0016285147,0.000107451226,0.000018153205,0.0000857786,0.000060120587,0.0005132455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498504,0.000087849265,0.0005092742,0.0015740636,0.0014037812,0.0014399774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983621,0.000101276724,0.00010737812,0.000660892,0.0000023935409,0.0007659318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042244414,0.0007524957,0.0005285736,0.00010594801,0.0014412415,0.00017938795,0.0009423387,0.00015530894,0.0022519333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002857927,0.0008123354,0.0002501058,0.0006244216,0.0005506658,0.00058651814,0.0045379954,0.00046431378,0.0043807104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000413757,0.00017359655,0.83665365,0.000040394807,0.00024166353,0.00040100238,0.005100565,0.0034315924,0.10954707,0.000003931417,0.034396384,0.009968791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005065073,0.00013936654,0.87511206,0.000108290566,0.00013034126,0.00006112565,0.009048024,0.0009124387,0.010438529,0.000022573366,0.10205671,0.0014640057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15834592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20564201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09910855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038967447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019107254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405497520","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70015","title":"Evaluating Sampling Designs to Survey Fish Diversity in Lakes From Northern Temperate Zones","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Génome Québec","keywords":"Temperate climate; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Sampling (signal processing); Diversity (politics); Fishery; Geography; Ecology; Sampling design; Environmental science; Biology; Engineering; Population","score_opus":0.1031422426852203,"score_gpt":0.28722498453233664,"score_spread":0.18408274184711632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405497520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99752486,0.00016226202,0.00015846871,0.00018069676,0.00028431125,0.00044169129,0.00084533566,0.00008837774,0.00031400137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99487543,0.00008430045,0.0038157308,0.0004067156,0.000044985463,0.000021945822,0.00019950778,0.000033631666,0.0005177481],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728805,0.000226171,0.00030598164,0.00095804024,0.0007068089,0.00051497185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991529,0.00027993743,0.00004734627,0.00033440132,9.672476e-7,0.00018447633],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064195093,0.00035032255,0.00027273278,0.00007679438,0.0005278017,0.00008209009,0.0004654696,0.00010443104,0.003509613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005251892,0.00036681007,0.00009605208,0.00026666003,0.00029307016,0.00038818197,0.0025054985,0.00025145317,0.0060824663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003546274,0.00011623812,0.9570577,0.000004954103,0.000037468064,0.000032140095,0.0027482037,0.002828431,0.032874975,6.515396e-7,0.0006595153,0.0036042514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027462366,0.000116279574,0.9949526,0.00004224374,0.000029102268,0.0000017508585,0.00072438415,0.00042240266,0.0020636457,0.000104924664,0.0008266296,0.0004413768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040778983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068080993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037894927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012137567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033504998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405708555","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70049","title":"Rare Taxa Are Key Links in Regional Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles in Dusts Across Diverse North American Regions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Taxon; Key (lock); Geography; Antibiotic resistance; Resistance (ecology); Biology; Ecology; Microbiology; Antibiotics","score_opus":0.020968254648565318,"score_gpt":0.2680880031520362,"score_spread":0.24711974850347085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405708555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959261,0.00024030214,0.000010060313,0.002015897,0.00013706948,0.00039298658,0.0002940205,0.000063387786,0.0009201702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592334,0.0008217444,0.00028653356,0.001040183,0.00007642455,0.000017651164,0.00009891146,0.000046305933,0.0016888811],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731314,0.00011091474,0.00040470844,0.0008660563,0.0004696892,0.00083551457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922824,0.00006575332,0.000107171625,0.00031609702,5.651315e-7,0.0002821641],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001663139,0.00037172963,0.0003175716,0.000073328556,0.00015795906,0.00008033376,0.00037313203,0.00013387953,0.0007770364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001789388,0.00035656337,0.00012313755,0.0005198468,0.0013630688,0.00059941196,0.0005327004,0.00077913597,0.0016253769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010128824,0.00061850593,0.95511883,0.00004873155,0.000015037938,0.0011176586,0.0012646116,0.0005305154,0.028552813,0.00001826471,0.008373368,0.0042403587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005500136,0.00004466672,0.9677015,0.00019703059,0.000011181241,0.000029490717,0.00066588324,0.00022340078,0.0040475004,0.00004119051,0.026017364,0.0004707776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002621692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00335131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024505313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000859737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008678555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405824325","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70054","title":"Taxonomic Blind Spots: A Limitation of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding‐Based Detection for Canadian Freshwater Fishes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Parks Canada; Ontario Genomics; Environment and Climate Change Canada; McMaster University; Genome Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biology; Zoology; Ecology; Fishery; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.017662027962462985,"score_gpt":0.1959997124692176,"score_spread":0.1783376845067546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405824325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942785,0.0003278799,0.0004474803,0.0002513872,0.0003547634,0.0011161127,0.0022527822,0.0000679037,0.0009032216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99343204,0.00012828999,0.004641031,0.00023446583,0.00007329805,0.0001590333,0.00045237556,0.00006195059,0.0008174965],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753344,0.000070460796,0.00045710627,0.0008416979,0.00047201346,0.00062529545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990851,0.00014143268,0.00012270187,0.00037011437,8.276806e-7,0.00027978545],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028611434,0.0004358113,0.00032626084,0.00020931575,0.00042664201,0.00006241029,0.00034232126,0.00018442958,0.0043008574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016596743,0.00045291038,0.00031352305,0.0001307455,0.0007274348,0.0005381963,0.00022526173,0.00019726502,0.0017337498],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018907213,0.00042736102,0.11132234,0.00009658059,0.00027704146,0.000035795878,0.0010497348,0.0011857972,0.8593757,0.000017317621,0.005499256,0.020523984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018591554,0.0005065104,0.4642467,0.000061363105,0.00037347426,0.000017483637,0.0012559738,0.004658707,0.3602291,0.00017661085,0.16552867,0.0010862553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019902433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005730777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4991466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019299312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001048316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406346015","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70029","title":"Estimating Rapid Diversity Changes During Acute Herbicide Contamination Using Environmental DNA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; York University; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Fonds de recherche du Québec; Groupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologie; Canada Foundation for Innovation; McGill University","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Contamination; Environmental science; Diversity (politics); Environmental chemistry; Biology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Chemistry","score_opus":0.010276573857602724,"score_gpt":0.206881956556814,"score_spread":0.19660538269921127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406346015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953761,0.00019901071,0.00035146633,0.00021753769,0.00050336466,0.00069248665,0.00018730028,0.000121934194,0.002350767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99053556,0.00020543943,0.0062823226,0.0004956049,0.00007062307,0.000025412288,0.00009905408,0.000038609935,0.002247348],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967682,0.00013912635,0.0003996863,0.0010627618,0.0008321862,0.00079806685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989276,0.000067997236,0.00025181577,0.0005558909,9.265419e-7,0.0001957938],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024776114,0.0005919092,0.00044099207,0.00014072465,0.002139711,0.000054774104,0.00065221643,0.0002061086,0.0041528638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014613989,0.00067215355,0.00019076733,0.00020160814,0.0010655912,0.0006130192,0.0046910667,0.0003236827,0.0010795344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060305283,0.00028865787,0.6039616,0.000019259867,0.00018139552,0.00006391661,0.0008578764,0.0006331689,0.3898302,0.0000040221194,0.00033195538,0.003767636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014109146,0.000114019,0.90787256,0.00005058384,0.00028888576,0.00002905816,0.0011844527,0.0015876773,0.085709035,0.00006718442,0.0009979956,0.0006876468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016034058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027701817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30412117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028664998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000030926353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406689079","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70045","title":"<scp>DNA</scp> Metabarcoding Improves the Taxonomic Resolution of Visually Determined Diet Composition of Beaked Redfish (<i>Sebastes</i> sp.)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Sebastes; Fishery; Composition (language); Biology; Zoology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Art","score_opus":0.00862366500909608,"score_gpt":0.2001592836476967,"score_spread":0.1915356186386006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406689079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99144876,0.00025097848,0.00017169013,0.00012443865,0.00019177255,0.0006958154,0.00017058205,0.000031081272,0.006914891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625736,0.00023762556,0.002191431,0.00021621719,0.000021924528,0.000036627785,0.000057283465,0.000019232668,0.00096226734],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978014,0.00016104493,0.00058804516,0.0005425229,0.00049505464,0.00041192307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987241,0.00026196602,0.00041106017,0.0005250299,0.0000022210334,0.00007563335],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003723319,0.000331644,0.00040831568,0.000078029065,0.00037977024,0.000019327574,0.00057181023,0.000118519965,0.00018345888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039237013,0.0002952065,0.00023119691,0.0001974253,0.0015009553,0.0003094694,0.0011696562,0.00019137215,0.00013113084],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006323436,0.00030793666,0.14375731,0.000029927129,0.00010708091,0.0000025180893,0.00042631957,0.00021957504,0.85108024,0.000029197376,0.0027124113,0.0012642177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069750997,0.0002861484,0.68680245,0.00004452563,0.00016900062,0.0000022233025,0.0011396864,0.00028884842,0.3052951,0.00007638069,0.005071044,0.00012709154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011426294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017092934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5457852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004972376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004280126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407184115","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70059","title":"<scp>eDNA</scp> Sampling Systems for Salmon Ecosystem Monitoring","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nuu Chah Nulth Tribal Council; University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Pacific Salmon Foundation","keywords":"Ecosystem; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Fishery; Environmental DNA; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Biology; Biodiversity; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.017070653801565194,"score_gpt":0.22671207471393504,"score_spread":0.20964142091236984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407184115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872125,0.001338558,0.0012090264,0.000047208116,0.0013715681,0.0012020371,0.00032253904,0.00013441869,0.0071621835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901998,0.00041831558,0.0028451588,0.000085799315,0.0001321992,0.00022017077,0.000047803023,0.000041101597,0.0060096234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744505,0.00006949703,0.0004443045,0.0008404255,0.00049057207,0.00071015203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988405,0.00033182054,0.0001680743,0.0004983717,0.0000014730421,0.00015973637],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003086204,0.00042824674,0.0003856675,0.00008269624,0.0007290938,0.00008332613,0.0005396734,0.00017904966,0.00010578569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050030012,0.00045536764,0.0002002632,0.00016067551,0.0002684112,0.00031588328,0.0008505634,0.00019109937,0.0011832505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011888084,0.00021614286,0.9447194,0.00009045934,0.00015230302,0.000004991405,0.00043323508,0.0031929063,0.041159198,0.000068982525,0.008650483,0.0013000633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010823807,0.00023036012,0.72017175,0.0001284896,0.000133577,0.0000081547605,0.004683221,0.00044126448,0.024844147,0.00013824963,0.24781819,0.00032024307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046863675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000058348933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2391677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014628035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000028574564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408093578","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70073","title":"A Framework to Unify the Relationship Between Numerical Abundance, Biomass, and Environmental <scp>DNA</scp>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Biomass (ecology); DNA; Environmental DNA; Computational biology; Environmental science; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Biology; Genetics; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.0152069212110747,"score_gpt":0.23100345529177704,"score_spread":0.21579653408070235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408093578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99241734,0.00039672965,0.0011875795,0.0013250159,0.00020596673,0.00084126776,0.0002618039,0.00008475959,0.0032795125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911627,0.00010753283,0.0032345303,0.0014718798,0.000068924055,0.0000796775,0.00008507821,0.000039421644,0.0037502283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968344,0.00019753377,0.0004558007,0.0010265665,0.00073233276,0.0007533458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744225,0.0013283347,0.0001425385,0.0007590269,5.196615e-7,0.00032732807],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032753288,0.00053460116,0.00038406244,0.00008191786,0.0012796585,0.00009023421,0.0007498888,0.00026722124,0.0005613259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015547885,0.00046878032,0.00015336474,0.00041202462,0.001613017,0.000303603,0.0022160537,0.0005476473,0.0033310037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008967902,0.00015744638,0.9863649,0.0000081571125,0.00006659799,0.000009174956,0.0009507591,0.000033009517,0.0040100003,0.00018909312,0.0066314787,0.001570388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036584557,0.000117511394,0.9456708,0.000030393292,0.00010057131,0.000006601576,0.0016624471,0.000018202465,0.0023998537,0.0016035604,0.047792107,0.00023209467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006675775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005364182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04116063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009031156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003843735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409089410","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70087","title":"Monitoring Atlantic Salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) Smolt Migration in a Large River System Using Environmental <scp>DNA</scp>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Salmo; Fishery; Environmental DNA; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Ecology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.008781146731458914,"score_gpt":0.20235588954878855,"score_spread":0.19357474281732964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409089410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958445,0.0005833833,0.00012249177,0.000047273308,0.0005609076,0.000920504,0.00014310096,0.00012920193,0.0016486263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960784,0.00045076373,0.001899912,0.00014073619,0.000080773665,0.00006081483,0.00009182258,0.000060483402,0.0011363426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572223,0.00022701707,0.000716735,0.0012638405,0.00093960285,0.0011305951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986968,0.0001490202,0.00026030026,0.0006744182,9.0289484e-7,0.00021852615],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040514226,0.0007134286,0.0005685153,0.00022059419,0.00068115536,0.00007036493,0.00063126587,0.00031539233,0.00032035058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002107852,0.00079369574,0.00024511278,0.00035746398,0.0007301656,0.00070345064,0.0015536379,0.00046417126,0.0019105586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016354652,0.00048077147,0.84811705,0.000033812954,0.000060190338,0.000099196135,0.0011287016,0.0005386462,0.1487732,0.000008680375,0.00035344303,0.0003899468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013702349,0.00008221601,0.95869935,0.00017030734,0.00012252067,0.000025981224,0.0056450595,0.0011181879,0.029130174,0.000023981584,0.0032592718,0.0003527359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000678816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007136548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119643025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004390713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059920753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409190820","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70092","title":"Development, Validation, and Implementation of <scp>eDNA</scp>‐Focused <scp>qPCR</scp> Assays to Detect and Distinguish Between Goldfish (<scp><i>Carassius auratus</i></scp>) and Prussian Carp (<scp><i>Carassius gibelio</i></scp>)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services; Government of Alberta; University of Alberta","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Alberta Innovates","keywords":"Carassius; Carassius auratus; Carp; Chemistry; Fishery; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.009184770927752245,"score_gpt":0.22658876942191314,"score_spread":0.2174039984941609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409190820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886723,0.0011186062,0.0003229841,0.000120005316,0.00032954165,0.0019688942,0.0014389028,0.0001769839,0.005851752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841845,0.0008670197,0.01090747,0.00049992016,0.00013042377,0.00020354676,0.000566694,0.0001249299,0.0025154985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926741,0.0003894681,0.0015059636,0.002300819,0.0014767097,0.0016529515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99571687,0.0016620728,0.0008713896,0.00085881597,0.000016345739,0.0008744906],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010845995,0.0012957575,0.0011689576,0.0004043631,0.0015388221,0.00034015707,0.000828152,0.0005069187,0.00004586865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067440287,0.0014159459,0.00018421235,0.00082890486,0.0016578486,0.00093479024,0.0029729765,0.00066010194,0.00021082733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051687302,0.00016972602,0.91593546,0.00013853057,0.00042018242,0.000022820224,0.006965246,0.000034469384,0.042862978,0.000018163562,0.017930202,0.015497058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002206335,0.00041532828,0.79301906,0.000081774364,0.00035621057,0.000017795803,0.009609704,0.000014791439,0.1321351,0.00015909864,0.061793197,0.00019160406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049725705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035473888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12291638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011981645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042009273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409190872","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70089","title":"Combining <scp>eDNA</scp> Metabarcoding, Hydrology‐Based Modeling and Camera Trap Datasets to Assess the Potential of River <scp>eDNA</scp> in Monitoring Terrestrial Mammals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Ministry of Environment; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; European Commission","keywords":"Trap (plumbing); Environmental DNA; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Geology; Biology; Biodiversity; Environmental engineering; Geotechnical engineering","score_opus":0.022556802864741755,"score_gpt":0.24381849943724584,"score_spread":0.22126169657250408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409190872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963675,0.0004651711,0.0006174448,0.00012908377,0.00044610933,0.000832089,0.0005431653,0.000038415943,0.000560981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962334,0.00023805427,0.0027659836,0.0003058081,0.000056633187,0.00006283496,0.00010997232,0.000033654487,0.00019362856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647474,0.00030244206,0.000657518,0.0009991986,0.00075679994,0.00080927217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984561,0.0004925201,0.0002227863,0.0006206236,0.0000014249674,0.00020650735],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006552927,0.00053214084,0.00057972816,0.00020091003,0.00053733337,0.00006466142,0.0008293145,0.00020547317,0.00005839062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013971847,0.00049922004,0.00016559742,0.00030335644,0.0011050934,0.00042465897,0.001808169,0.00049397466,0.00010290183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029998702,0.0004236998,0.8014136,0.000024899506,0.0001926,0.00003670927,0.0016499315,0.052262876,0.14136055,0.000012028929,0.0010300289,0.0015630637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031193236,0.00048430564,0.9071865,0.00011205506,0.0002930726,0.0000100793695,0.005661523,0.010481215,0.068349965,0.00017595838,0.0038663035,0.00025969418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041057754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043914122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1057729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045170705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000084677595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410499731","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70121","title":"Improving the Understanding of Detections From <scp>iDNA</scp> Surveys in Malaysian Borneo With Multiscale Occupancy Models: A Case‐Study Using Leech Blood Meals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Leverhulme Trust; Queen Mary University of London","keywords":"Occupancy; Biology; Sampling (signal processing); Covariate; Ecology; Environmental DNA; Statistics; Invertebrate; Biodiversity; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.031163588151681538,"score_gpt":0.221864879023497,"score_spread":0.19070129087181545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410499731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928318,0.00016781388,0.0047858846,0.000017389826,0.000086695334,0.0010259091,0.00016567305,0.00003383911,0.0008849541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707437,0.000038878676,0.0025932987,0.000039104558,0.0000102862205,0.000042309443,0.000010427288,0.000028497649,0.00016282129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972811,0.00047083932,0.00045529014,0.00077411515,0.00051172415,0.0005069783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876153,0.00034332162,0.00022089347,0.00058356696,0.0000012700091,0.00008942526],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006176168,0.0003858933,0.0003816819,0.00011475918,0.0007044716,0.000041242525,0.0004045961,0.00011498414,0.000116853604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023949233,0.00032318497,0.00010278435,0.00041648888,0.00083182397,0.00041091064,0.000973791,0.0003333987,0.000029098386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009328064,0.00080993393,0.9577419,0.000008710554,0.00016200579,0.0002787376,0.0036651096,0.0057720556,0.030761208,0.0000039185666,0.000015177883,0.00077188027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021120696,0.0002522305,0.882954,0.000054605356,0.00036806826,0.000101847625,0.09698867,0.00631598,0.010376772,0.0002202696,0.000009692659,0.00024579774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017410008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053731115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09332356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001173534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006844971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411095492","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70100","title":"A Metadata Checklist and Data Formatting Guidelines to Make <scp>eDNA FAIR</scp> (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Victoria","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; European Commission","keywords":"Metadata; Disk formatting; Interoperability; Checklist; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Database; Biology","score_opus":0.03255661795179208,"score_gpt":0.28272250757985384,"score_spread":0.25016588962806174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411095492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820734,0.0016785307,0.00060584996,0.0011685435,0.00021313824,0.0007327857,0.00082984124,0.00008182888,0.012616084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8792894,0.0037564714,0.05574214,0.0076137558,0.000092747054,0.00008379535,0.00053704664,0.000081612794,0.05280307],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965976,0.0000859925,0.00060511066,0.0014143249,0.00058456766,0.0007124285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806136,0.00015296663,0.00015342401,0.0013242781,0.000003210002,0.00030478145],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000729333,0.00051791087,0.00045882104,0.00013831035,0.000773802,0.0003379801,0.0014520331,0.00014197349,0.0003219255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002923323,0.00049210264,0.000050739283,0.00033416087,0.000769792,0.0018131639,0.0140618365,0.00028702948,0.00040956365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023147113,0.00019290869,0.83055806,0.00007738064,0.00020690043,0.000020346826,0.0006487686,0.000099703524,0.02156208,0.000037166163,0.1211854,0.025388159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008799521,0.00015597092,0.5944328,0.00010920386,0.00015970996,0.000025861942,0.0030227988,0.00057744374,0.0064906413,0.00013742398,0.39365977,0.00034847518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003208839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001912852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27247438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033562502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005037265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411240691","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70139","title":"Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> (<scp>eDNA</scp>) Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction‐Based Assays for Surveying 125 Taxa of Importance to North America","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre; University of Victoria; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Canada Research Chairs; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Polymerase chain reaction; Biology; Genetics; Gene","score_opus":0.01343405584146363,"score_gpt":0.2278370646678604,"score_spread":0.2144030088263968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411240691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98760426,0.00045853393,0.0017670426,0.00017902725,0.00036238687,0.001972072,0.003319077,0.000088253495,0.00424934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815601,0.00022621514,0.011377541,0.0016334527,0.000047782265,0.00028234234,0.00069356215,0.00008434095,0.004094662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485433,0.00027124435,0.0009719292,0.0016141558,0.0010826081,0.0012057386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965468,0.0013496737,0.00068903767,0.0009698604,0.000003837372,0.0004407609],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004321167,0.00089111907,0.00085963914,0.00027466434,0.0007854342,0.00004848482,0.00092751585,0.00023845349,0.00045362432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031096823,0.0009941369,0.00045880614,0.00058485946,0.0015669172,0.00052522356,0.0011159935,0.00038096693,0.0016138618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048323793,0.0010101055,0.7356917,0.00004630003,0.00023329971,0.00001331865,0.0014278939,0.00096276304,0.2435809,0.000018742041,0.014856431,0.002110185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015210955,0.00085359125,0.8598656,0.00004495257,0.00015121007,0.0000032065504,0.0059901485,0.00023192076,0.08378635,0.00004863851,0.047204565,0.00029873606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022312405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016300094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15979454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016920745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016656106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411705537","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70125","title":"Automating the Curation of <scp>DNA</scp> Barcode Databases for Vascular Plants","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Barcode; Database; Computer science; Data curation; World Wide Web; Operating system","score_opus":0.01395009620961197,"score_gpt":0.22464380499899753,"score_spread":0.21069370878938556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411705537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937034,0.00030415197,0.0014907221,0.00012040137,0.00016959914,0.0007847283,0.00044419363,0.00004268421,0.0029400897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928686,0.00030235015,0.0049519683,0.00035513812,0.000027795888,0.0000822081,0.00018779107,0.000017926293,0.0012062252],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998352,0.00007865446,0.00033077563,0.0004509433,0.0004344942,0.00035315147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989141,0.0003904353,0.0001670201,0.0004719113,9.114367e-7,0.000055604836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025467563,0.00024473984,0.0002272158,0.000038884704,0.00053789397,0.000018750856,0.00044493165,0.000060352337,0.00031042387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085198546,0.00020236874,0.00015111394,0.000101022255,0.00067325204,0.00036893206,0.00079156895,0.00011275857,0.00028494556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013752629,0.00039475225,0.65150064,0.000057800764,0.00019205833,0.000003059101,0.0011498372,0.000884844,0.32067174,0.00018823976,0.018294316,0.006648971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061920617,0.00006696009,0.85993797,0.00003855362,0.00009273132,0.000001917491,0.0020441648,0.0006492975,0.10399802,0.00017136433,0.032265484,0.00011434103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000067740686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017315582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21667373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028124716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002863858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8252358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412047390","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70106","title":"Navigating the Murky Waters: Variation in Low Abundance Sequence Filtration in Fish <scp>eDNA</scp> Metabarcoding","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Sequence (biology); Biology; Zoology; Genetics","score_opus":0.011160386732921163,"score_gpt":0.22426879500465577,"score_spread":0.2131084082717346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412047390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966664,0.000077434684,0.00012646576,0.00062470516,0.00017847937,0.00056229666,0.00005363175,0.000032350734,0.0016782596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971644,0.000216835,0.0011470506,0.0008941786,0.000019806455,0.00007544979,0.000043547,0.000014573863,0.00042411353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779946,0.00018113933,0.00042744074,0.0006346193,0.00045386393,0.00050350843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992114,0.00024310396,0.00014076008,0.00035160597,7.4174676e-7,0.000052403502],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005138014,0.00028819905,0.00022760133,0.00004390032,0.00036070414,0.000060809267,0.00047298684,0.00010984399,0.00021376724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008030294,0.00026176314,0.00007655805,0.00036898727,0.0005223617,0.000665845,0.0005971055,0.000516669,0.0003525788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005210547,0.00017232685,0.89344895,0.000014871113,0.000019090698,0.000013378194,0.0041717696,0.0050398516,0.09444838,0.000028454333,0.00028395685,0.002353767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005032891,0.000041753792,0.9734946,0.00011353267,0.000016004824,0.0000027167023,0.0022530926,0.0012112402,0.021012068,0.00028282593,0.0009361118,0.00013274583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040875355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032086959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08004568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001356769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000036226616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412425774","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70134","title":"Winds of Change: Charting a Pathway to Ecosystem Monitoring Using Airborne Environmental DNA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Environmental change; Environmental monitoring; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Climate change; Ecology; Biodiversity; Biology; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.02950081881988259,"score_gpt":0.23109551435935052,"score_spread":0.20159469553946793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412425774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958176,0.00028389227,0.000086850305,0.00013079109,0.00053706823,0.0009929937,0.0003235611,0.000069553695,0.0017576995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956413,0.00010422312,0.0028827833,0.0002646337,0.00012224037,0.00008186092,0.000026727588,0.00005010888,0.00082611374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650365,0.00012621006,0.0006972517,0.0010093658,0.00083753176,0.0008259617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986733,0.000068289,0.00028426864,0.0006981804,0.0000010844253,0.00027487418],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035321448,0.0005704695,0.00056288607,0.0001741403,0.0005278735,0.000028676943,0.0006642436,0.00018825175,0.0014504566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018840587,0.0006291877,0.00023626882,0.00032113353,0.00043921432,0.00048288546,0.0021423849,0.00025660836,0.0012842708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003429262,0.0002756863,0.55242866,0.000024179028,0.00006312321,0.000015914602,0.0010415412,0.0002714872,0.44006816,0.000005510053,0.000080261234,0.0056911698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062345056,0.00015287405,0.6882184,0.00012877378,0.000073522286,0.000008099229,0.0020540021,0.00016785013,0.30280447,0.000017410099,0.0052407724,0.0005103315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001179776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010948782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13726369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019132168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045397423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412426875","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70149","title":"Inferring Plant Community Phenology via Bee‐Collected Pollen","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Phenology; Pollen; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.02301643454860745,"score_gpt":0.18338471701998033,"score_spread":0.16036828247137289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412426875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882406,0.00018185603,9.150822e-7,0.00046477167,0.00003452661,0.000085812426,0.00014103422,0.000056870987,0.010793635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977006,0.000116985946,0.000012705284,0.00033930107,0.000040016475,0.000008502955,0.000089836954,4.6393453e-7,0.0016916287],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944746,0.000077681936,0.00010805504,0.00011554664,0.00006299535,0.00018825001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998024,0.000120372744,0.000026934662,0.000018512552,7.546214e-7,0.000031006897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000050065715,0.00010021518,0.00012710776,0.000008867293,0.0005433654,0.000015810292,0.00017680334,0.0000562036,0.000536751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000065165723,0.00004157027,0.000041515035,0.00009354047,0.00008202238,0.000043133077,0.00025917677,0.0001563733,0.00008214674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044311655,0.00018923794,0.10146635,0.0000031815844,0.000043538133,0.0000057326056,0.00013381425,7.33447e-7,0.8809597,0.00012460805,0.0021110338,0.014917778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114905946,0.000100291385,0.9635518,0.00000916086,0.000009010857,0.0000034375198,0.00045954913,0.000015716356,0.007922191,0.0003382608,0.027375042,0.00010060746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024999032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013802425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87303746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003075918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000012659029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5877047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412427136","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70158","title":"Impact of <scp>CO<sub>2</sub></scp>‐Induced Aquatic Acidification on Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> and <scp>RNA</scp> Shedding and Persistence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Hakai Institute; Liber Ero Foundation; Genome Canada; Tula Foundation; Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada; Genome British Columbia","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); RNA; DNA; Chemistry; Biology; Cell biology; Gene; Genetics","score_opus":0.013431882633938415,"score_gpt":0.22206406036338439,"score_spread":0.20863217772944598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412427136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99228793,0.00073086715,0.000042259468,0.000047278925,0.00018324865,0.0011275563,0.00031002707,0.000082254104,0.0051885555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99548835,0.0023763098,0.0005088769,0.00025222666,0.00005025684,0.00007316994,0.00015199545,0.00007787772,0.0010209429],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994789,0.0002688469,0.00081990927,0.0017520189,0.0012091285,0.0011611009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99694246,0.0010802919,0.00055885786,0.00091447507,0.000002107471,0.0005018271],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005163217,0.00102594,0.00081356266,0.00028597435,0.0009976198,0.000116895266,0.00071112206,0.00041201516,0.0001076282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025505404,0.0010543856,0.00038508794,0.00033015694,0.002227138,0.0007790648,0.0013667278,0.00059965154,0.00096877856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067129135,0.00047568043,0.42264464,0.000029160752,0.00017558137,0.000013395832,0.0017815484,0.00009980601,0.5701132,0.0000066456087,0.0016182828,0.0030353263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010221546,0.00058817485,0.68142873,0.0000675116,0.0001769434,0.000019439232,0.005158401,0.00022581332,0.31042406,0.000083821426,0.0006715775,0.00013335179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008307231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009281423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25968915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018277094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012773218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412427140","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70152","title":"Assessment of Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> Survey Design for the Detection of Freshwater Unionid Mussels","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biology; Fishery; Zoology; Ecology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.016158748451785148,"score_gpt":0.22503535035312192,"score_spread":0.20887660190133678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412427140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818982,0.00035691212,0.01387275,0.0000528023,0.00034105981,0.0015584537,0.0011382006,0.000026987327,0.00075461913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928291,0.00051110215,0.0047578095,0.00013606621,0.000019389696,0.00011867769,0.000094597606,0.000031715397,0.0015015848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972354,0.00031654094,0.0006144792,0.0006558443,0.00067668775,0.0005010582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976159,0.0012755367,0.00035357385,0.00066264044,0.000002158824,0.000090201705],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009843269,0.00041096844,0.00043610018,0.00008873801,0.0004988123,0.000019939525,0.0006912501,0.00017037636,0.00072078966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005572685,0.00034064736,0.00025325318,0.00019490703,0.0015266534,0.0002356476,0.0009064093,0.00020800662,0.00011165319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028375747,0.00047235508,0.5047374,0.000019416108,0.00017809273,0.0000010779481,0.00024081732,0.0014074296,0.48932981,0.000010313382,0.0011787174,0.0023962324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007351214,0.00025606423,0.7626096,0.000013139969,0.00012403794,0.0000016506522,0.0008189984,0.0006170983,0.2295407,0.000088074645,0.005074899,0.00012059293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018254752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009484197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2597891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007415086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006815679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412591959","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70147","title":"Persisting at the Edge of Ecological Collapse: The Impact of Urbanization on Fish and Amphibian Communities From Lake Xochimilco","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council","keywords":"Amphibian; Urbanization; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Geography; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.009496316168259555,"score_gpt":0.21070422622034193,"score_spread":0.20120791005208238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412591959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99443156,0.000025812808,0.0000036505492,0.0008475094,0.000039396706,0.00018108035,0.00010295908,0.000005488131,0.0043625706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848306,0.000033796867,0.0000133837075,0.00066528615,0.000010490334,0.000009572475,0.00007063128,0.0000039223246,0.00070983457],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993756,0.0001603392,0.00015574314,0.00010946737,0.00010031458,0.000098581186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992572,0.00041428205,0.00010123099,0.0002088756,0.000001078448,0.000017304961],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015956207,0.00008902774,0.000106236635,0.000012221148,0.0003641706,0.0000070709307,0.00017394534,0.0000630046,0.0027735082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028405695,0.000053983385,0.00004982068,0.00007551729,0.0007424038,0.00004986059,0.00027691646,0.00009339633,0.000020391852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003809836,0.0000959174,0.9900213,0.0000014074312,0.000027223918,2.7090485e-7,0.00080406334,0.00067304313,0.0023409869,0.000034363908,0.005542872,0.00042048958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021636873,0.00011685222,0.99670666,0.000009341708,0.000021484724,8.3182533e-7,0.0009415462,0.00043555658,0.00089795975,0.00014747027,0.00045617993,0.00004972771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026402087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025875682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006685417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013133418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005157781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99813807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412766331","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70150","title":"Innovative Airborne DNA Approach for Monitoring Honey Bee Foraging and Health","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Insect and Pesticide Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Beef Farmers of Ontario; Laurentian University; York University","funders":"Government of Canada; Ontario Genomics; Genome Canada","keywords":"Foraging; Honey bee; Biology; Environmental science; Zoology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03627993612989784,"score_gpt":0.2828141186056197,"score_spread":0.2465341824757219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412766331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969301,0.00043685577,0.00015539082,0.0010521653,0.00004868196,0.00036602674,0.000040197006,0.00001954973,0.00095100247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983882,0.00008388017,0.0006368866,0.00018007081,0.00013529231,0.00005066748,0.00007423134,9.0293366e-7,0.00044987915],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926054,0.000027381417,0.0001216208,0.00021725528,0.00010906994,0.0002640998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998042,0.00007844201,0.000032233904,0.000025663143,0.0000045380066,0.000054904493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000250249,0.00009107254,0.00011593951,0.000015075425,0.00029980674,0.000033576773,0.00009272375,0.000040767794,0.0000443427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009303755,0.000041060903,0.000025571255,0.00016801294,0.00006499612,0.00006509658,0.00009077821,0.00009253307,0.0000031951076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043952703,0.00014671958,0.10196302,0.000048763035,0.000027815278,9.949027e-7,0.00027265947,0.000004705201,0.5302175,0.00089041784,0.0005890277,0.3657944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028508174,0.00026192956,0.94803464,0.000029570188,0.000003899108,0.000001760674,0.0010865093,0.00022709579,0.045524236,0.00064489874,0.0037534607,0.00014689831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008624393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061250644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84607166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007279532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061642395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23059013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412774451","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70136","title":"Using <scp>eDNA</scp> to Assess Freshwater Bacterial Diversity Along a Forest–Non‐Forest Gradient in the Afrotropics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Ecology; Geography; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.026191341225673414,"score_gpt":0.22695235218725007,"score_spread":0.20076101096157667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412774451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99557096,0.00003443044,0.00026760015,0.00018942042,0.0004402204,0.0009791993,0.0001784747,0.000028938348,0.002310736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99535847,0.000041320338,0.0028584562,0.0010288316,0.000059878843,0.000041677675,0.000057229656,0.00002011199,0.00053402927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972278,0.00016397839,0.00035658482,0.0007655347,0.00072450575,0.0007615904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990217,0.00013711934,0.00010149277,0.000584195,0.0000011405267,0.0001543488],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003342139,0.0004238628,0.00031914268,0.00011394967,0.0009114058,0.00008329339,0.0010280348,0.00014679859,0.00036739415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003596168,0.0003629201,0.00016061804,0.0003061978,0.00063165615,0.00036506096,0.005398287,0.00030890666,0.0007500493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017582037,0.00030558853,0.976913,0.000008808652,0.00004313291,0.000045321198,0.0026608494,0.002412492,0.012992917,0.000023863942,0.004353391,0.00022307529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007239829,0.00015478232,0.9790228,0.000026680087,0.00006387036,0.0000065192276,0.0024547642,0.00020592031,0.0026073647,0.00028248507,0.014258182,0.00019264502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010062323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032376777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0103855515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013411455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042156767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412852738","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70169","title":"Sedimentary <scp>DNA</scp> Metabarcoding and Indigenous Knowledge Reconstruct Natural and Anthropogenic Disturbances to a Freshwater Lake in the Oil Sands Region of Alberta, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Prairie Bible Institute; University of Calgary; University of Victoria","funders":"Liber Ero Foundation; Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Oil sands; Natural (archaeology); Indigenous; Ancient DNA; Sedimentary rock; Environmental science; Geology; Ecology; Geochemistry; Geography; Archaeology; Paleontology; Biology","score_opus":0.005311374339199508,"score_gpt":0.18843042307142693,"score_spread":0.18311904873222742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412852738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99514914,0.002138861,0.0000010617282,0.00029349144,0.00018935415,0.00027518085,0.0000982777,0.0000061473916,0.0018485003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968727,0.00073622173,0.00028856442,0.00058461586,0.000014492372,0.000023210356,0.000032035758,0.000010233941,0.0014379259],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984044,0.000110493405,0.0002864316,0.0005148094,0.00029600336,0.0003878731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993272,0.0002536354,0.00008456884,0.00024834895,7.192439e-7,0.00008556434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016228699,0.00027958935,0.00028918206,0.00006500322,0.00035469417,0.000022735321,0.00030728788,0.00005982885,0.00011605393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020043124,0.0002228524,0.00004934864,0.0001755508,0.00089116726,0.00018158653,0.0007351231,0.00018674113,0.00001753253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013756968,0.00009482277,0.9783144,0.000026337993,0.00006041636,0.000024333665,0.006859829,0.0000097310485,0.0055652666,0.0000043095047,0.0031441303,0.005882636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005450172,0.00007139082,0.953625,0.00004160777,0.00006250476,0.000032890843,0.007526712,0.0000136420895,0.008788029,0.000024408724,0.029123897,0.00014490477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07354307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54947156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47592852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038652375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008739525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9326263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413265033","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70173","title":"Sexing From Seawater: Application of Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> Beyond Species Detection for Cetaceans","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Raincoast Conservation Foundation","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Administration portuaire Vancouver-Fraser","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biology; Sexing; Humpback whale; Whale; Fishery; Balaenoptera; Biodiversity; Population; Zoology; Ecology","score_opus":0.005342395872831704,"score_gpt":0.18218590805488494,"score_spread":0.17684351218205324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413265033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879208,0.00024166814,0.005050326,0.000093587856,0.0002795186,0.0011235344,0.0009875651,0.000069237336,0.004233736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916605,0.00023594397,0.0036344412,0.00024651774,0.00006710755,0.00013492322,0.0003258943,0.000038912596,0.0036557806],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738204,0.00007333351,0.0005211144,0.0009290011,0.0005550601,0.00053943344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876153,0.0002563226,0.00027089214,0.0005831288,0.0000010586496,0.00012703876],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019749337,0.00045191435,0.0004152242,0.000095340394,0.00052028894,0.000030446065,0.00050647405,0.00020711169,0.0006530669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019316207,0.0004919547,0.00025566158,0.00014674426,0.0009823294,0.0003706546,0.0008467788,0.00019002274,0.0006984547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021073527,0.0002929137,0.40214592,0.000014054795,0.000092324655,0.000001288205,0.0005209383,0.00017691375,0.5893634,0.000011356404,0.0009903907,0.006369449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073003606,0.0001066859,0.5913906,0.000009908281,0.00011682259,0.0000012550263,0.0017124577,0.00034774322,0.37521243,0.0004509125,0.029758658,0.0001624687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000115462986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051074487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21415095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010515063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000023492046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413526498","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70170","title":"A State‐Of‐The‐Art Review of Aquatic eDNA Sampling Technologies and Instrumentation: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Dartmouth General Hospital; Dalhousie University; Ocean Networks Canada Society","funders":"Office of Naval Research; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Instrumentation (computer programming); Sampling (signal processing); State (computer science); Systems engineering; Engineering; Environmental science; Data science; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.010097635148427193,"score_gpt":0.21640479281999672,"score_spread":0.20630715767156954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413526498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88194335,0.111521944,0.00001675987,0.0027287041,0.00015112382,0.001055714,0.00005262478,0.000034421442,0.0024953892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5924584,0.4028333,0.003847482,0.00032024304,0.000007668525,0.00004080476,0.000010484655,0.000010927364,0.0004706828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987877,0.000038725302,0.00030574703,0.00036678463,0.00031840403,0.00018264135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994344,0.000034120418,0.00019190926,0.00031039488,8.0242927e-7,0.000028369352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013605034,0.00019645935,0.00026717005,0.000033192206,0.00014733685,0.0000047446833,0.00021897646,0.000048470014,0.00011421465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017172037,0.00016241452,0.000048108308,0.00011935011,0.0010559462,0.00017180937,0.0010284779,0.00011473843,0.000021065955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025066951,0.00025026433,0.49604058,0.0018035257,0.00010354318,0.0000017273649,0.00076210924,0.000005406554,0.016599149,0.00018839845,0.00066364073,0.48355657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059814344,0.0001324926,0.94301045,0.0011784824,0.00009228836,0.000005417742,0.0025772394,0.000006089083,0.017193442,0.0010393581,0.03393135,0.00023523215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000071618106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001026635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48332134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017160935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002116802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6623072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413886940","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70119","title":"Ecological Function and Diversity of the Endosphere Microbiome in Leaves and Fruits of <i>Coffea arabica</i> L. Across Elevation and Shade Gradients","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; University of Oregon","keywords":"Biology; Microbiome; Ecological niche; Context (archaeology); Phyllosphere; Ecology; Coffea arabica; Botany; Habitat","score_opus":0.005374888579268419,"score_gpt":0.16905088280360367,"score_spread":0.16367599422433526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413886940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99936175,0.00018749741,4.6741943e-7,0.00017515193,0.000028412134,0.00014596812,0.000016968115,0.0000024337953,0.00008137263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99973994,0.000075802796,0.0000053041717,0.000054995027,0.000004920549,0.0000023558077,0.000006024384,2.0562958e-7,0.000110442656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959505,0.000031512536,0.0000997687,0.00014199565,0.00004695771,0.000084709376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99985945,0.000052976666,0.00004554918,0.00002259378,0.0000012748918,0.000018156194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006689044,0.000059280064,0.00009330523,0.0000037174764,0.00011351983,0.000006640007,0.000053894884,0.000046036977,0.000030821477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000047357153,0.000024059955,0.000020356782,0.000061305196,0.00019769113,0.000054236705,0.00030711328,0.00004475621,4.3074667e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016218883,0.000052650714,0.67772245,0.0000048334173,0.0000038243647,1.180614e-7,0.00015652968,2.788194e-7,0.31357208,0.000029399167,0.000012159368,0.008429454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024190187,0.00007772423,0.98969537,0.000010904108,0.000007102393,8.109577e-7,0.00047568264,0.00000439153,0.008843487,0.0002916999,0.00031136442,0.00003958467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006747834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019691496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3119729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014357143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":7.032472e-7,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09811365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413986812","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70145","title":"Combining Hydroacoustics and <scp>eDNA</scp> to Estimate Species‐Specific Biomass in a Pelagic Fish Community","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Pelagic zone; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Biomass (ecology); Seascape; Biology; Zoology; Ecology; Habitat","score_opus":0.013289824709713937,"score_gpt":0.22160498152788957,"score_spread":0.20831515681817564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413986812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809311,0.00014173365,0.000120384655,0.0002564026,0.00016717937,0.00052314554,0.00015847058,0.000062486324,0.017639067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99389863,0.00018841226,0.0024992316,0.00077206333,0.000012781426,0.000030115763,0.00004925378,0.0000253028,0.0025242383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776495,0.00018822924,0.00037573063,0.0006099395,0.00043275356,0.0006284024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988501,0.00029813487,0.00008851358,0.000552155,8.417279e-7,0.00021025713],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003809764,0.00040502852,0.00036690835,0.00015203253,0.0006806135,0.00007005933,0.0005548218,0.00014119563,0.00030601415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058081077,0.00045677816,0.0000722719,0.00036648742,0.0009931982,0.00022729808,0.0026136115,0.00049388927,0.0007261979],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010763546,0.00046153524,0.9126205,0.000020985075,0.000033511846,0.000026424843,0.0024158568,0.0004923596,0.07407088,0.00003654296,0.008885578,0.0009250954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076135946,0.0001942791,0.96318746,0.000042627893,0.000026555876,0.0000067472743,0.0032256958,0.0001463368,0.0079961745,0.00025563824,0.02395407,0.00020307695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017570268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024370615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06607471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009964386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021814074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414135801","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70179","title":"Tracking Aquatic Biodiversity With Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> : A Study in Quebec's Mining Region","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Genome British Columbia; Génome Québec; Genome Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Habitat; Aquatic ecosystem; Ecosystem; Abundance (ecology); Water quality; Environmental monitoring; Disturbance (geology)","score_opus":0.011587544561810312,"score_gpt":0.1939047867040166,"score_spread":0.1823172421422063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414135801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99488956,0.00014752468,0.000057909285,0.00014565264,0.00014483095,0.0013566547,0.00004373004,0.00008830935,0.003125837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994387,0.000103613274,0.00070998736,0.0004259007,0.00001818889,0.00006387973,0.000054742562,0.000029424662,0.004207287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996084,0.00025156036,0.00051822426,0.0013530347,0.0009032791,0.00088993926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864775,0.00022733076,0.00022647282,0.0006988365,5.597589e-7,0.00019907055],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030741422,0.00067040854,0.0005424436,0.00023148413,0.00067603076,0.0000866331,0.00060764764,0.00018146915,0.0004911585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002542333,0.00067368394,0.00014849556,0.00040823198,0.0011869184,0.0007913913,0.0014091706,0.0004033415,0.0015141718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049215658,0.0014908089,0.9807804,0.000009707738,0.00010827566,0.0003875318,0.0058140648,0.00024001862,0.0056434562,0.0000012571146,0.0021817943,0.0032934474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002408816,0.0004102085,0.95692503,0.00004756514,0.00014294365,0.00001621128,0.033951044,0.000053921827,0.0026707116,0.00002023347,0.003022913,0.00033039684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029216378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003999837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028136978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026046233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007631317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414879948","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70270","title":"Capture Probe, Metabarcoding, or Shotgun Sequencing: Which Best Reflects Local Vegetation?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Tula Foundation; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Norges Forskningsråd; European Commission","keywords":"Shotgun; Shotgun sequencing; False positive paradox; Replicate; Taxon; Vegetation (pathology); Abundance (ecology)","score_opus":0.017722909912405282,"score_gpt":0.24008741935062963,"score_spread":0.22236450943822436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414879948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9142847,0.00072799023,0.001874329,0.0007942317,0.00048697824,0.0010933753,0.00006682968,0.00016483838,0.08050671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740244,0.0002536386,0.00595423,0.0011221109,0.000026105732,0.000071478695,0.000053143725,0.00003257202,0.018462304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717647,0.00011209151,0.0004014328,0.0009519072,0.0006996756,0.0006584486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904466,0.0000807452,0.00013259782,0.0005515028,0.000002416928,0.0001881102],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022273972,0.00048389708,0.0003688426,0.000092379276,0.000635008,0.00005207581,0.0005655412,0.00020225061,0.0041459436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038815757,0.00043083006,0.0001316878,0.00045195923,0.00093509443,0.0004673317,0.0010482939,0.00038202194,0.0044153454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024482925,0.0011677468,0.6723858,0.00012891238,0.00041203486,0.00019971076,0.0034170381,0.0037169144,0.29153317,0.00030869964,0.015975239,0.0105099175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024764484,0.0005242249,0.8119391,0.0001832769,0.0005082207,0.00006497966,0.007809889,0.0008307853,0.09315501,0.000797695,0.07997317,0.0017372031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020800476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003729581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19837815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020724996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015130586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416619086","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70223","title":"Congruence of Fish Community Diversity and Composition Estimates Using Water and Sediment (Benthic Surface and Trapped Suspended Solids) Based Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> in a Recently Restored Creek","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Royal Ontario Museum; Ontario Genomics; University of Guelph; Genome Canada","keywords":"Electrofishing; Species richness; Environmental DNA; Sampling (signal processing); Species diversity; Benthic zone; Sediment; Community structure; Water quality","score_opus":0.017446296966666164,"score_gpt":0.2167584551078622,"score_spread":0.19931215814119604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416619086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985617,0.00017829881,0.000022293509,0.00012494891,0.00005954572,0.0006438676,0.0002129745,0.00002415695,0.00017224878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975222,0.00041746112,0.0015409429,0.00031221323,0.0000036460594,0.000006317085,0.00010510199,0.000016807508,0.00007536247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977517,0.00031675078,0.0003872687,0.00061568205,0.0004445338,0.0004840815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990817,0.0002810039,0.00013863202,0.00033215637,0.0000011110089,0.00016542587],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044120903,0.0003864665,0.0004386228,0.0000811847,0.0013236464,0.00003974366,0.00026816296,0.00016484142,0.00018227767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013818597,0.000414265,0.000057457783,0.000088225264,0.0023431347,0.0003895564,0.0032821079,0.00036458368,0.000010308139],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042528427,0.00043337286,0.7055757,0.00004081052,0.000038864404,0.000012145947,0.0023959375,0.00034692982,0.29089496,0.0000011188471,0.000080650534,0.00013700553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019044196,0.00019686301,0.8918203,0.00007646996,0.00010947915,0.000009133472,0.0026002622,0.0017037395,0.101135865,0.000108613516,0.0001273371,0.00020752079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019124543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025788488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18975909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067358266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002913962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7081916165","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70104","title":"Field Test of the Self‐Preserving <scp>eDNA</scp> Filter and the Importance of Calibration When Changing Methods During Long‐Term Monitoring","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Calibration; Filter (signal processing); Field (mathematics); Test (biology)","score_opus":0.008475709578737336,"score_gpt":0.2264217688131738,"score_spread":0.21794605923443647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7081916165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98386085,0.0003783285,0.013179694,0.0006882716,0.00013065057,0.00014775443,0.00000175682,0.000018298524,0.001594405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933787,0.000024730813,0.0053207185,0.00007083356,0.00003113637,0.000012485977,5.5201224e-7,0.0000018793365,0.001158963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992536,0.00008239557,0.00019794128,0.00019374782,0.00011777351,0.00015458793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989047,0.0005220298,0.00013589022,0.00041528622,0.0000036467784,0.00001842431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034243404,0.00009203334,0.00012101413,0.000025736272,0.00015257472,0.000026850938,0.0004945047,0.00004649285,0.000011778488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001632809,0.000061947554,0.00005218718,0.00010519912,0.000079427235,0.00016118401,0.00091513403,0.00011057139,2.0345894e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002699905,0.000033497457,0.8570152,0.00013160166,0.0000339982,0.0000013960715,0.003366048,0.000084184074,0.13769425,0.00038726756,0.000036430774,0.0012134102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023426842,0.000012387034,0.3266057,0.000077952056,0.000010495545,0.000003821533,0.00021577957,0.0032784431,0.6684235,0.0010437671,0.00006382131,0.000030082447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000043010323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011774171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53072923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017306767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000063196553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2526148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083328939","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70182","title":"<scp>eDNA</scp> Metabarcoding to Monitor Fish Communities in a Large River Floodplain","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des Laurentides; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation","keywords":"Floodplain; Biodiversity; Environmental DNA; Wetland; Habitat; Ecosystem; Species richness; Ecosystem diversity; Electrofishing","score_opus":0.0114075381042345,"score_gpt":0.20442954626253076,"score_spread":0.19302200815829626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083328939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901963,0.0004551171,0.000017764976,0.00007472451,0.0002197162,0.000153578,0.0004749226,0.000032628028,0.008375282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947137,0.00007852153,0.00025738342,0.00080907776,0.00003066221,0.000004378189,0.0002733109,0.0000036974657,0.0038292345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894893,0.00018107038,0.00017029031,0.00017359052,0.00016529277,0.00036080045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951434,0.00019099168,0.000023143368,0.00017794578,0.0000013855143,0.000092181785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030605542,0.00014603356,0.00016424894,0.000081169856,0.0002266208,0.000048502327,0.00023878342,0.000056268513,0.0007357663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022700027,0.00012991756,0.00005312047,0.00015100691,0.0000716921,0.00017802746,0.000054654047,0.00018545042,0.00042429063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053761714,0.000045749362,0.98565954,0.000009808626,0.000020263056,0.000011007016,0.0029394992,0.00023693616,0.0002920265,0.000015824617,0.001758802,0.009005157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027317568,0.000055220557,0.95592976,0.000035352692,0.000007019699,0.0000014945056,0.007941438,0.00039352156,0.0007025987,0.000058786813,0.034529116,0.00007249302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079337193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007618789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032770313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018830862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045517854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8056125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7092308661","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70212","title":"Comparison of <scp>DNA</scp> Extraction Methods for Detecting the Sea Otter ( <scp> <i>Enhydra lutris</i> </scp> ) in Marine Sediments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"Hakai Institute; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Genome Canada; Mitacs; Genome British Columbia","keywords":"Otter; Seawater; Sediment; Extraction (chemistry); DNA extraction; Environmental DNA; DNA","score_opus":0.01784828465734538,"score_gpt":0.3018022971321825,"score_spread":0.2839540124748371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7092308661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875722,0.0003245784,0.0021567002,0.00013970135,0.0004618408,0.0013042135,0.000076369826,0.000047692818,0.007916693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709015,0.000138758,0.024332706,0.00059885933,0.00004883743,0.0001699113,0.000066594424,0.00004205986,0.0037007958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968119,0.0003449503,0.00074561994,0.00082287396,0.0005424993,0.0007321204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972141,0.0016865247,0.00040987224,0.0005745515,0.0000024179544,0.00011258349],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010159509,0.00047429977,0.00055167836,0.00012943226,0.0005460547,0.000039086706,0.0006635486,0.00022044149,0.00021880187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023220215,0.00043139074,0.00024873987,0.00035787863,0.00075430446,0.0003810533,0.0015200436,0.00046642785,0.00025998807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011440599,0.0005085288,0.772058,0.00003144756,0.00008444903,0.0000023588786,0.0010129823,0.0005498867,0.2060258,0.000004095471,0.005144243,0.014566747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009209746,0.00013461325,0.5836313,0.000024686397,0.00010237916,0.0000029544572,0.0032941112,0.00057889655,0.36942327,0.00020581693,0.041596036,0.00008497309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000246249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005750415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18842673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009975536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004407622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}