{"meta":{"query_hash":"db305dfec0c9","filters":{"venue":"Environmental DNA"},"cohort_total":144,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":144,"exported":144,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/db305dfec0c9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Environmental+DNA"},"results":[{"id":"W2937376009","doi":"10.1002/edn3.7","title":"Meta‐analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species‐specific abundance in nature","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Biology; Relative species abundance; Natural (archaeology); Environmental science","score_opus":0.020113966745113662,"score_gpt":0.22173623223537486,"score_spread":0.2016222654902612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937376009","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13953696,0.46549955,0.33261836,0.01402502,0.004714455,0.00083368056,0.032986403,0.002507069,0.0072785816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83915335,0.027094303,0.117515855,0.0045850216,0.00087037013,0.00085287564,0.007856097,0.00089188985,0.0011803063],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.95940393,0.026437398,0.0036848008,0.0075755343,0.0022812015,0.00061707856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84773403,0.12305614,0.0072499183,0.016035467,0.004787587,0.0011368078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055832036,0.002303325,0.0055363565,0.0074132453,0.00079531415,0.0046652732,0.003551753,0.0022982606,0.0068829167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12341005,0.001029565,0.020644026,0.008102325,0.0009746756,0.0036945164,0.0025204986,0.0030138874,0.00067762646],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012498403,0.00008773933,0.13495754,0.03843235,0.7488237,0.00055371743,0.00042686562,0.007820324,0.0036353543,0.0055758175,0.0057400744,0.052696686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005617781,0.00066308345,0.122739,0.012287505,0.7715388,0.00049964845,0.00058116094,0.022342863,0.003382614,0.030221827,0.034913372,0.00026834002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044833785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007831846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055832036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012566581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020578553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29527158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946940689","doi":"10.1002/edn3.18","title":"Welcome to Environmental DNA!","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Metagenomics; Publication; Relevance (law); Ecology; Biology; Ancient DNA; Field (mathematics); Data science; Evolutionary biology; Computational biology; Geography; Biodiversity; Computer science; Genetics; Political science; Sociology; Gene","score_opus":0.005958398789608377,"score_gpt":0.17649516461089784,"score_spread":0.17053676582128946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946940689","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020424713,0.004636612,0.000998167,0.08435348,0.8962214,0.000103131606,0.00030002836,0.0009038281,0.01227908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026432748,0.005586628,0.0020558164,0.111694336,0.668144,0.000257399,0.0005772986,0.0013552792,0.20768598],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894605,0.0021361941,0.0009290108,0.0017796772,0.0048317485,0.000862828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9058351,0.018008409,0.007312757,0.004224752,0.037462994,0.02715597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009612607,0.0021046214,0.0017592123,0.0033384236,0.0037410639,0.016385932,0.0023445552,0.008083925,0.2034109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076675154,0.0008730586,0.001451753,0.0015001455,0.0023356301,0.007295747,0.004860108,0.010635347,0.18590519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003061973,0.000015974696,0.000070856775,0.00014523898,0.000005753705,0.00009750987,0.000068819216,0.000010747317,0.00016999959,0.00041482443,0.9863419,0.01262772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009851462,0.00001837083,0.0000889423,0.000113122056,0.0000042515444,0.00013929572,0.00013299893,0.000014271731,0.000075102565,0.00043330155,0.9989579,0.000012557686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039912653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009203268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2034109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013718408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004528948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68047726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952272889","doi":"10.1002/edn3.17","title":"High‐resolution biomonitoring of plant pathogens and plant species using metabarcoding of pollen pellet contents collected from a honey bee hive","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","funders":"Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Biology; Pollen; Phytophthora; Pythium; Quarantine; Botany; Invasive species; Ecology","score_opus":0.03556756965370622,"score_gpt":0.17414847923134186,"score_spread":0.13858090957763564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952272889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813306,0.0010014592,0.0101357335,0.00011796916,0.000020780024,0.00010330888,0.006024256,0.00017277898,0.0010931278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484079,0.000688309,0.042353332,0.00016428246,0.000014833087,0.00007608129,0.0065620993,0.0000707836,0.0016623792],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997191,0.000026738393,0.000017678645,0.00010702041,0.000097126256,0.00003232034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997265,0.000052621268,0.000064290376,0.000016583,0.00011788903,0.000022255274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027757036,0.00047634874,0.00032356416,0.001427604,0.00076065504,0.0006556914,0.00031140397,0.0004774541,0.00044324403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042044756,0.00017015773,0.0003814406,0.0010350992,0.0002277845,0.00017320788,0.00030147136,0.00032786236,0.00021779141],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015343487,0.00006111727,0.07098904,0.00016012887,0.00010318877,0.00030811547,0.0004580566,0.00051890634,0.9114338,0.00007750684,0.0002688119,0.015467936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014094923,0.00039105563,0.7635197,0.00007678351,0.00028966935,0.0014599387,0.0011477844,0.01111368,0.21452902,0.00018712573,0.007217533,0.000053596064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012636307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025827618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012636307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027097293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004117352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025125504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962568139","doi":"10.1002/edn3.62","title":"A new primer for metabarcoding of spider gut contents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Primer (cosmetics); Biology; Invertebrate; Spider; Predation; Zoology; Predator; Clade; In silico; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Phylogenetic tree; Genetics; Gene; Chemistry","score_opus":0.016593724647661998,"score_gpt":0.2113660635360616,"score_spread":0.19477233888839962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962568139","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052377366,0.0056104814,0.90846914,0.0006785433,0.0014341014,0.0026170944,0.011594756,0.009659182,0.0075594177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026485158,0.00058547535,0.95538795,0.0008088164,0.00007529293,0.0022817827,0.008275939,0.0007916467,0.0053079785],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915718,0.0021554304,0.00082684297,0.004007492,0.00095378567,0.0004846426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951946,0.0023099927,0.0005709786,0.00045341364,0.0012175593,0.0002534577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045164656,0.003997794,0.0027676234,0.0045644497,0.0010273575,0.0010969297,0.0017419304,0.0038261535,0.0136391185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007810809,0.00278349,0.0026572705,0.001874008,0.0009612701,0.001539435,0.0011936955,0.0040908004,0.011203078],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001066063,0.0002632008,0.0015086081,0.0020590154,0.0001710294,0.00047410134,0.0003196597,0.00046392044,0.94523966,0.0016889547,0.0042407946,0.04250495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004760672,0.00184337,0.008118795,0.00060559565,0.00061084965,0.0038755478,0.0002112061,0.019460684,0.8297655,0.0019379449,0.13285172,0.0002427895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061971607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017771197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0136391185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006928097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016804001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045627415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973214152","doi":"10.1002/edn3.33","title":"Assessing different components of diversity across a river network using eDNA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Universität Zürich; Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich; Velux Stiftung; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Biodiversity; Gamma diversity; Beta diversity; Nestedness; Taxon; Environmental DNA; Ecology; Alpha diversity; Ecosystem diversity; Identification (biology); Sampling (signal processing); River ecosystem; Biology; Scale (ratio); Geography; Ecosystem; Cartography","score_opus":0.03297630764086952,"score_gpt":0.24209651532838006,"score_spread":0.20912020768751055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973214152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922667,0.00014122763,0.006367926,0.000009386265,0.0000023601806,0.000013725603,0.000508482,0.000024045848,0.00066605484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921409,0.00006196857,0.007132028,0.000007469089,0.000002854332,0.00002273966,0.00044409823,0.000004087219,0.00018375395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916935,0.00024566893,0.00009229249,0.0003065893,0.0001335364,0.000052569125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790657,0.0007811721,0.00063684606,0.00016361955,0.00035077817,0.00016105645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010338593,0.00033723898,0.00042869837,0.0040556705,0.00040760965,0.00093376345,0.00038121248,0.0003460198,0.00093563896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020826517,0.0002115894,0.00021263295,0.002955495,0.00057115726,0.0009092136,0.0010020245,0.0002511274,0.00016790647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015735642,0.000036840534,0.9572401,0.00013133124,0.00026979457,0.00007666841,0.0006827356,0.0034487597,0.019366113,0.00023641584,0.000059876438,0.018293977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005353272,0.0001275878,0.98848224,0.000022711054,0.000057131096,0.0002335716,0.00063200766,0.0071574785,0.0023459818,0.00041140546,0.000505746,0.000018864717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018817201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041165077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040556705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036586056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013026204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0054676533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974095620","doi":"10.1002/edn3.29","title":"Reporting the limits of detection and quantification for environmental DNA assays","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":566,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Victoria","funders":"National Wildlife Research Center; Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; Innovate BC; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Standardization; Detection limit; Computational biology; Biology; Limit (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Data mining; Computer science; Ecology; Statistics; Mathematics; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.022399680103801663,"score_gpt":0.22161192126742696,"score_spread":0.1992122411636253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974095620","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025059499,0.0027692162,0.93963414,0.0013805891,0.00087059545,0.0013797606,0.010461222,0.004249222,0.014195786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15238684,0.001994935,0.8156303,0.002764852,0.00028537767,0.0075740255,0.0120183565,0.0013472056,0.0059979446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8537928,0.057857342,0.016243896,0.018389672,0.05110021,0.0026160884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8401314,0.08006485,0.019919973,0.023820564,0.035227958,0.0008352779],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08450504,0.0032422766,0.0023851534,0.007879901,0.0025280314,0.008633205,0.0068779094,0.0064754556,0.0076015373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15044369,0.0019404395,0.003296274,0.0056674248,0.003791996,0.0046421723,0.0055300696,0.004457063,0.0057872497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013870697,0.0011925129,0.11627008,0.010542649,0.0014974611,0.00090654136,0.0046423525,0.038257614,0.31795216,0.061210938,0.049362358,0.3967783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017553597,0.0009948409,0.03145622,0.0024636253,0.0006349993,0.0014704863,0.0016069566,0.05821534,0.63094985,0.0415476,0.22974336,0.0007411656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004437381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005315658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.915495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036836974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044819145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44691068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975566040","doi":"10.1002/edn3.30","title":"Recreational water monitoring: Nanofluidic qRT‐PCR chip for assessing beach water safety","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"TaqMan; Contamination; Biology; Virulence; Polymerase chain reaction; Environmental science; Gene; Ecology; Genetics","score_opus":0.01658149413686141,"score_gpt":0.24321296441356058,"score_spread":0.22663147027669917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975566040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81167865,0.00089738995,0.18222575,0.0002684901,0.00006548289,0.00015529459,0.0017283725,0.00063150405,0.0023490146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82349527,0.0004781031,0.17020145,0.00024886805,0.000021535938,0.000256591,0.0011308031,0.00003744832,0.0041299677],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994722,0.00009250104,0.000026786043,0.00017122945,0.00019218387,0.000045060217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970585,0.00009358624,0.00007372218,0.000018706505,0.00008763221,0.00002049326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045216305,0.00036638448,0.00018568762,0.00018069337,0.00015190493,0.00034724548,0.00034995686,0.00036511006,0.001132116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000594892,0.00019239912,0.00015119497,0.00013419347,0.00031746854,0.00032941296,0.00024274425,0.00030304707,0.00027501443],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030346506,0.000019002313,0.0017908093,0.000032627697,0.000003858522,0.000007081413,0.000019523677,0.00030526804,0.9936279,0.000048423193,0.000080095175,0.0040350812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061964233,0.00020564989,0.008727094,0.000009647909,0.000015527467,0.00004488413,0.00003835604,0.009437418,0.97969806,0.00007881401,0.0017241194,0.000014195283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015275525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033725663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015275525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039285756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004042895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0037873387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980835560","doi":"10.1002/edn3.35","title":"Comparing eDNA metabarcoding and species collection for documenting Arctic metazoan biodiversity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Churchill Northern Studies Centre; ArcticNet","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Arctic; Ecology; Phylum; Species richness; Biology; Invertebrate; Beta diversity; Marine biodiversity; DNA barcoding; Pelagic zone; Fishery","score_opus":0.017269662289115195,"score_gpt":0.19035872546235721,"score_spread":0.17308906317324202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980835560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687603,0.0016870688,0.023382528,0.00013299267,0.000037684847,0.00017678316,0.002056386,0.00015328018,0.0036129479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9023552,0.0010914931,0.091772534,0.00019644992,0.000019249166,0.00016603657,0.0026263897,0.000053340336,0.0017192496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774617,0.0005288072,0.00020316588,0.0005534914,0.0007526273,0.00021573131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962155,0.00083660166,0.000845088,0.00023853175,0.0016473451,0.00021696453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028525654,0.0006239601,0.00036956707,0.0028605831,0.0010366353,0.0013736574,0.0005711812,0.00041405493,0.0006641134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043443944,0.00030648228,0.0003242321,0.0023461315,0.0005310964,0.0004224346,0.00096246693,0.00026937356,0.0002201271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005829723,0.00008123269,0.7204256,0.00042343148,0.0003835975,0.00011704638,0.0013415166,0.0010063074,0.2077489,0.0002462307,0.00034125143,0.06730175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012497192,0.00022521554,0.9173297,0.0000936881,0.00026176035,0.00028353755,0.0015871134,0.0034434341,0.07199149,0.00009597646,0.0046336693,0.000041857977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30948052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012707108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001956044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15661311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982308128","doi":"10.1002/edn3.46","title":"Fly‐derived DNA and camera traps are complementary tools for assessing mammalian biodiversity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Infection and Immunity","funders":"German Academic Exchange Service London; Max-Planck-Gesellschaft","keywords":"Biodiversity; Range (aeronautics); Environmental DNA; Ecology; Biology; Invertebrate; Habitat; Transect; Ecosystem; Abundance (ecology); Alpha diversity","score_opus":0.021782225995154225,"score_gpt":0.21384583541991575,"score_spread":0.19206360942476153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982308128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94303876,0.00370313,0.041218046,0.00012894087,0.00005597751,0.00030847234,0.004432637,0.00016857267,0.0069454983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8565055,0.0015317725,0.13661528,0.00026742485,0.00004794128,0.000391249,0.0026728015,0.00003809214,0.0019299667],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768746,0.00088006014,0.00017900456,0.00054280314,0.0005931564,0.00011753723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994601,0.0013834494,0.0024015447,0.00034520327,0.0010057319,0.00026309665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014333649,0.0007491041,0.0004415963,0.0039764927,0.00044662756,0.0009615801,0.00065965013,0.00062227354,0.0023863032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030688564,0.0004026378,0.00043255414,0.0018394635,0.00063285936,0.00084353564,0.00089740695,0.00043340027,0.0005847221],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033378115,0.000091288544,0.77008724,0.0008944897,0.0005746523,0.00016776129,0.0008765013,0.0006611045,0.13818604,0.00048726314,0.00036065094,0.087279186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016367803,0.00045432983,0.95241266,0.00025894144,0.00022339227,0.0010733224,0.0012879869,0.0014623984,0.03770875,0.00033836678,0.0047159754,0.000047519523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023537904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013370369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039764927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035653327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033067277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007982969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983054701","doi":"10.1002/edn3.56","title":"Using environmental DNA metabarcoding to map invasive and native invertebrates in two Great Lakes tributaries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Trillium Foundation","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Dreissena; Introduced species; Biology; Ecology; Tributary; Invertebrate; Endangered species; Invasive species; Taxon; Genus; DNA barcoding; Freshwater ecosystem; Habitat; Geography; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Mollusca; Bivalvia","score_opus":0.017289298577927686,"score_gpt":0.22493292482671318,"score_spread":0.2076436262487855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983054701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999003,0.00009333379,0.0001500343,0.000021833872,0.0000010073269,0.000011256351,0.0002204983,0.000006190731,0.0004929571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978593,0.00007570634,0.0009222763,0.00004219809,0.0000019247707,0.000016304071,0.00056967424,0.0000028499078,0.0005098603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978656,0.000028057662,0.000017327846,0.000083544444,0.0000462504,0.000038276692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995473,0.000058655423,0.00014010209,0.000029099578,0.00014359216,0.00008126028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019201079,0.0002044888,0.000118119526,0.0014138125,0.000637409,0.00044287302,0.00027659952,0.00024330056,0.00047985336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005428541,0.00013413973,0.00012966421,0.00095727795,0.00037796638,0.00012655987,0.0004916841,0.00013807292,0.00008742493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000475284,0.00001130893,0.97857827,0.000030972453,0.000034873512,0.00021522364,0.0013306466,0.0000779797,0.013157011,0.000037501584,0.00013731922,0.006341346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044010762,0.000016508453,0.9978459,0.000007321936,0.00001380083,0.0001264634,0.0006350846,0.00021297506,0.00041855266,0.000014997312,0.0007011665,0.0000027594288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20110424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51972526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20110424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096836523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084427994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39986736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991401217","doi":"10.1002/edn3.59","title":"Detection of spatiotemporal variation in ranavirus distribution using eDNA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Bacteriophages and microbial interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ranavirus; Abiotic component; Ecology; Biology; Biotic component; Amphibian; Habitat; Population; Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Environmental health","score_opus":0.005613924612785615,"score_gpt":0.20239750394474695,"score_spread":0.19678357933196133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991401217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99781466,0.00007108218,0.0008871247,0.0000073199617,0.0000011967277,0.000006607272,0.0005650964,0.000010758139,0.00063615583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987031,0.000038684662,0.00068257673,0.0000069069056,5.6197723e-7,0.0000055089818,0.00028590203,0.0000014829528,0.00027519034],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998098,0.00002355633,0.00000899602,0.000075477146,0.000047093137,0.000035173147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999458,0.000105624305,0.000203335,0.00002723141,0.00015994915,0.000045890054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002114581,0.000096960044,0.00011884983,0.00051945314,0.00020120281,0.0003577206,0.000181069,0.00010295377,0.00063713326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005430109,0.00008883035,0.000091834634,0.00064806436,0.00022909525,0.000113381975,0.00019593159,0.0001268767,0.00010867958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006573231,0.000010171564,0.96375,0.0000218244,0.00002673841,0.000031243886,0.00021714708,0.0002875777,0.03091533,0.000020736123,0.000050303774,0.004603236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.088832e-7,0.000017540453,0.9974099,0.0000030422045,0.000005430339,0.000023690782,0.00019506035,0.0003358386,0.0018131462,0.0000074406857,0.0001860663,0.000002086735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13929074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31523296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13929074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008328914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002956562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27695996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991423413","doi":"10.1002/edn3.58","title":"Environmental DNA surveys help to identify winter hibernacula of a temperate freshwater turtle","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Overwintering; Temperate climate; Ecology; Turtle (robot); Environmental DNA; Latitude; Biology; Population; Biodiversity; Environmental science; Fishery; Geography","score_opus":0.008443424260243184,"score_gpt":0.2104905815264887,"score_spread":0.2020471572662455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991423413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99839777,0.00010099515,0.0006793423,0.000019371291,0.000002141512,0.00000456118,0.00017354521,0.00001169145,0.00061054603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797493,0.000048487862,0.0013677034,0.00002705675,0.0000021834178,0.0000052077385,0.00013480337,0.0000023317605,0.00043726893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999242,0.000015588294,0.0000056165886,0.00002541456,0.000013543486,0.000015648859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996201,0.0000734244,0.00015992613,0.0000145738395,0.000079066864,0.000052842603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015619682,0.00019572004,0.000086967775,0.0005808635,0.00026369072,0.00026300226,0.00013314639,0.00016548621,0.0013188644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004068251,0.00009308369,0.00007131278,0.00026077975,0.00019842811,0.00022222367,0.00024158196,0.00010884231,0.00017362376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006537035,0.0000201643,0.9208252,0.000047029258,0.000025966721,0.00013135327,0.00047478933,0.00015893216,0.06353531,0.0000659141,0.00011945626,0.014530563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012710349,0.00007331778,0.9934515,0.000014629808,0.000014464359,0.00013271881,0.0007751711,0.00022817096,0.0045152116,0.000046525016,0.0007439425,0.0000031148184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059991637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026127812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059991637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021095123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015557179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011928499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997071661","doi":"10.1002/edn3.66","title":"Specialized bacteriome uncovered in the coralloid roots of the epiphytic gymnosperm, <i>Zamia pseudoparasitica</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Botany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; Secretaria Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Botany; Gymnosperm; Cycad; Epiphyte; Cyanobacteria; Proteobacteria; 16S ribosomal RNA; Bacteria","score_opus":0.009298425427029723,"score_gpt":0.17914807719899878,"score_spread":0.16984965177196906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997071661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986241,0.00012879647,0.0002239976,0.000011675324,0.0000019572533,0.0000068115137,0.00072223437,0.0000105095705,0.00027003683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99583983,0.0001301318,0.0009488255,0.00002583498,0.0000034237914,0.00001530602,0.0023220812,0.000014259214,0.00070030295],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99991417,0.0000047560725,0.0000062804233,0.00003963305,0.000017093365,0.000018034576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999876,0.000016310136,0.000043915876,0.000015459604,0.000023813158,0.000024458606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000058835154,0.00023931284,0.00021262282,0.0005577634,0.00027370913,0.00035836114,0.00014230167,0.00018895845,0.00061047595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016144771,0.00015021306,0.00016737705,0.00037601474,0.0001621421,0.00013970987,0.00032036423,0.00021147242,0.00021254663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004883355,0.0000051534525,0.006597527,0.000020392545,0.0000040884943,0.000040132396,0.00006231919,0.000015571952,0.992211,0.0000097968605,0.000011011975,0.0009741329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070863084,0.00013189299,0.91140056,0.000014961668,0.000038368296,0.00046558812,0.00033147202,0.00042532393,0.08533286,0.000027837472,0.0018164227,0.000007668151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030801685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005312102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030801685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018451693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020048278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006124437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999816348","doi":"10.1002/edn3.65","title":"Analytical validation and field testing of a specific qPCR assay for environmental DNA detection of invasive European green crab (<i>Carcinus maenas</i>)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; South Australian Research and Development Institute; Australian Government","keywords":"Carcinus maenas; Environmental DNA; Biology; Shellfish; Fishery; Ecology; Aquatic animal; Zoology; Decapoda; Biodiversity; Crustacean; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.025731592816908767,"score_gpt":0.1947873361184552,"score_spread":0.16905574330154644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999816348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93998516,0.00015074329,0.0562082,0.000098076685,0.000031945958,0.0008942452,0.0008165952,0.00026961768,0.0015454384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90974545,0.0002106605,0.08321737,0.00021602566,0.000014093548,0.0010548034,0.0020936038,0.00005434373,0.0033936019],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722373,0.00075458165,0.00021651592,0.000645003,0.0009843416,0.00017596493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767596,0.0005181299,0.00027582594,0.00022117187,0.0012085291,0.00010051593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027161296,0.00072072813,0.00035739457,0.00048668246,0.00044934585,0.00044249132,0.0005590351,0.0007000587,0.00062350923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024161485,0.00032982303,0.0005608928,0.00035241494,0.0006906695,0.00019471676,0.00047880976,0.00038794958,0.00044004698],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005391513,0.00016131168,0.0065614805,0.00008474512,0.000013566657,0.00005172304,0.00019157787,0.0012852857,0.9878077,0.00006627116,0.000079926234,0.0036424347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021507745,0.002828324,0.018230507,0.00003331493,0.00006632735,0.00018638103,0.0002112439,0.006815607,0.96912295,0.00004727011,0.0024071299,0.000029526653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068063326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010771964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068063326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048984826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010138067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014364421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000222237","doi":"10.1002/edn3.61","title":"A mesocosm comparison of laboratory‐based and on‐site eDNA solutions for detection and quantification of striped bass (<i>Morone saxatilis</i>) in marine ecosystems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Stantec (Canada); Dalhousie University","funders":"Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Genome Atlantic; Offshore Energy Research Association","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Bass (fish); Morone saxatilis; Mesocosm; Bay; Fishery; Biology; Serranidae; Environmental science; Marine ecosystem; Ecosystem; Biodiversity; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Oceanography","score_opus":0.024184808207269783,"score_gpt":0.22441560597240268,"score_spread":0.2002307977651329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000222237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99024034,0.00013467442,0.0076200725,0.00004019856,0.00005059205,0.0001704854,0.00039973317,0.00008954797,0.0012544076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608463,0.00032098684,0.031847764,0.0002788229,0.000029192186,0.0006901789,0.0009475102,0.000038732716,0.0050005903],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999326,0.000077628014,0.000034220382,0.00032969433,0.00019613825,0.00003640702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995012,0.00015474773,0.000093184,0.00006694327,0.00013317971,0.000050672537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078426267,0.0003746029,0.00034923444,0.00020315059,0.00034720163,0.00037956436,0.00037527346,0.00043398363,0.0008075475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050221366,0.00023995782,0.00031000224,0.00016308701,0.00039549693,0.00034872143,0.00056428893,0.00063658366,0.00028269095],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039275593,0.00021567171,0.006389834,0.000037247333,0.000017497843,0.0000143625375,0.00007388327,0.00021144074,0.9883094,0.000026102063,0.00006080312,0.004250979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099178855,0.0045531844,0.1597786,0.000020677775,0.00012321332,0.00006493016,0.00027708846,0.007375347,0.82572645,0.00009292278,0.0018588433,0.000029458324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004064374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011601391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004064374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004701844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029950324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008081436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004206018","doi":"10.1002/edn3.71","title":"Detection of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) using environmental DNA in riverine systems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Centres of Excellence","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Unionidae; Watershed; Sampling (signal processing); Habitat; Biology; Ecology; River ecosystem; Fishery; Environmental science; Bivalvia; Mollusca; Biodiversity; Engineering; Filter (signal processing)","score_opus":0.014001013372072187,"score_gpt":0.18223055129401672,"score_spread":0.16822953792194453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004206018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989845,0.00006100405,0.000476119,0.000009327248,8.676495e-7,0.000006548266,0.00012579362,0.000009183624,0.00032662757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983335,0.000055427165,0.0008387074,0.000018717777,9.336771e-7,0.0000120624445,0.00019792655,0.0000020990253,0.0005406588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966466,0.000038481627,0.000020188414,0.00015068981,0.00008621921,0.00003979706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946636,0.00007643379,0.00023535048,0.000017188313,0.00015835003,0.00004634529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027746294,0.00020246873,0.00017194674,0.000642548,0.00046790575,0.00041803942,0.0002748108,0.00024609204,0.0004817971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005578835,0.00018966605,0.00012169125,0.00040955615,0.00048057406,0.00024320805,0.00031775679,0.00015375242,0.000074458534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015819317,0.000035341287,0.8081514,0.00009792516,0.00003540873,0.00007168015,0.0009147921,0.0005875312,0.18271865,0.000041583404,0.000060958024,0.0071263527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031631255,0.00013264723,0.9875574,0.000012268185,0.000016289885,0.000059685794,0.0006169426,0.0005908795,0.010428943,0.000012631259,0.00056270574,0.000006405345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063148804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21336429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063148804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011199387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038316884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12556249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004894873","doi":"10.1002/edn3.73","title":"Groundtruthing of pelagic forage fish detected by hydroacoustics in a whale feeding area using environmental DNA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Parks Canada; Université Laval; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Capelin; Pelagic zone; Forage fish; Fishery; Clupea; Biology; Population; Smelt; Environmental DNA; Coregonus; Ecology; Herring; Biodiversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.01670915200184356,"score_gpt":0.1856449888036504,"score_spread":0.16893583680180685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004894873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991233,0.000051690717,0.0002095048,0.000006888231,0.0000020785199,0.0000064830874,0.00025696962,0.0000058325004,0.0003372457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988469,0.000031934862,0.0003608003,0.000014246838,0.0000017206114,0.000009631788,0.00028087987,0.000001664169,0.00045224532],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998739,0.000015224161,0.0000069480416,0.000043198947,0.000029497076,0.00003129517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995435,0.000050170638,0.0001333863,0.000023793957,0.00015385955,0.00009531534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022816943,0.0001937476,0.00010883525,0.00095897535,0.00026355902,0.00027848117,0.00019422297,0.00020893407,0.0009128159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047576657,0.00011110304,0.000113713075,0.0004668229,0.00023747538,0.00014239628,0.0002682408,0.00012121076,0.00018371818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038444792,0.000014219311,0.97761714,0.000014626355,0.000024034724,0.00011723384,0.000322171,0.00005573673,0.017653331,0.0000056589274,0.0000620878,0.004075446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.721839e-7,0.000018804707,0.99919134,0.0000021217304,0.0000050009276,0.000043873082,0.00018786936,0.000083972474,0.00036707585,0.0000010602133,0.00009689813,0.0000015853275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14919968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3931279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14919968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052373175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003294811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29666245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009315083","doi":"10.1002/edn3.76","title":"Validating environmental DNA metabarcoding for marine fishes in diverse ecosystems using a public aquarium","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.049564339473255066,"score_gpt":0.2185644860824649,"score_spread":0.16900014660920984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009315083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93990225,0.00044231847,0.040758688,0.0007884382,0.00007633833,0.0011896929,0.0073375357,0.00063549,0.008869236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8693241,0.00037952367,0.11693573,0.0010330435,0.000031146814,0.0011055382,0.007195662,0.00017892382,0.003816297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931538,0.0012185542,0.00043362,0.0018360128,0.002585085,0.00077286747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99253803,0.0011005761,0.0015259491,0.0009120908,0.0034879954,0.00043542022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058959937,0.00069779,0.00077699346,0.0022933271,0.0031448638,0.0019016901,0.0018882154,0.0011226444,0.002017605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007457078,0.0005677647,0.0006178737,0.003209453,0.0026361346,0.0012836716,0.002675588,0.0005886943,0.0009791977],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006881338,0.00031663224,0.6112331,0.0008104405,0.0002899242,0.000687897,0.008362122,0.0020447536,0.30988482,0.0010574418,0.0023654024,0.0622593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041595296,0.0007508974,0.9063399,0.00026518456,0.00024829648,0.00035179825,0.005873916,0.003491373,0.060294136,0.00034417724,0.021879617,0.00011913382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26159984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56293744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26159984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050231847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00725046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52015436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011266069","doi":"10.1002/edn3.82","title":"Revising the range of Rocky Mountain tailed frog, <i>Ascaphus montanus</i>, in British Columbia, Canada, using environmental DNA methods","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations; University of Victoria","keywords":"Tributary; Environmental DNA; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Extant taxon; Ecology; Wildlife; Flathead; Fishery; Biology; Cartography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.012767263232182365,"score_gpt":0.205294716204646,"score_spread":0.19252745297246365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011266069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967879,0.0003647249,0.0005983724,0.000059911534,0.0000038482312,0.000059503316,0.0006118592,0.000014552351,0.0014993718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99586296,0.00030587855,0.0023132698,0.00010663526,0.0000037022423,0.00003739161,0.00055052416,0.000005727696,0.00081394403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994887,0.000052453448,0.00001750705,0.00013946519,0.00018427007,0.000117458054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989796,0.00010959177,0.00021500309,0.000037334547,0.0004983981,0.00016011856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051280187,0.00024199691,0.0001708661,0.0012034482,0.0018106368,0.0007205757,0.000726535,0.00026375684,0.0007361226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007673831,0.000170234,0.00015064338,0.001396806,0.00073459634,0.00021755543,0.00042598185,0.0003702881,0.00013619779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005864281,0.000048293496,0.94914025,0.00009455642,0.000035491135,0.00032592,0.00210374,0.0005372933,0.01853508,0.00008777817,0.00046670862,0.028566217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021866827,0.000031163807,0.9960615,0.00002241992,0.000010723045,0.00007061718,0.0014236583,0.00032141907,0.0006235095,0.000012120087,0.0014143357,0.0000063461584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94227934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05772066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046497993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067066196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11612111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011674956","doi":"10.1002/edn3.81","title":"An analysis of metadata reporting in freshwater environmental DNA research calls for the development of best practice guidelines","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Rubric; Environmental DNA; Data science; Sampling (signal processing); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Scale (ratio); Information retrieval; Data mining; Biology; Ecology; Geography; World Wide Web; Biodiversity; Psychology; Cartography; Filter (signal processing)","score_opus":0.15242663817614255,"score_gpt":0.3693315223589147,"score_spread":0.21690488418277215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011674956","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057198115,0.10185377,0.41177472,0.35260472,0.008313515,0.019406421,0.014529844,0.003212898,0.03110599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20871566,0.026847031,0.71020323,0.025608003,0.0010081528,0.019093623,0.0062248227,0.00094527367,0.0013542899],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.26623026,0.42320308,0.23060916,0.013082267,0.062769786,0.00410557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.058391552,0.6143459,0.079188906,0.055322807,0.18963148,0.0031193593],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6139743,0.0016673108,0.0029891005,0.037417445,0.0048371437,0.017560776,0.010125488,0.005273617,0.0026938259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.82308304,0.0024957932,0.0048386655,0.03964279,0.009533857,0.026487162,0.012506743,0.0080179535,0.001215275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036591425,0.00032675796,0.06919203,0.08463613,0.0015391166,0.0006695891,0.04282779,0.004551573,0.0037116029,0.094389156,0.09777446,0.6000159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025313708,0.0006358509,0.044916365,0.33166918,0.0020062486,0.0010310215,0.046365958,0.00916884,0.008163689,0.103190616,0.45163792,0.000961211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028829416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02318568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38602573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024039615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08094941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47603852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015290936","doi":"10.1002/edn3.83","title":"Validation of an environmental DNA protocol to detect a stream‐breeding amphibian, the Streamside Salamander (<i>Ambystoma barbouri</i>)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Salamander; Environmental DNA; Amphibian; Biology; Ecology; STREAMS; Zoology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.01454479359420164,"score_gpt":0.21745628883229115,"score_spread":0.20291149523808952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015290936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7461753,0.00037132518,0.24260616,0.0002174464,0.0001359593,0.0027050227,0.0022150667,0.0009324188,0.004641295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63343024,0.00042758512,0.35135418,0.0006288746,0.00007138492,0.0037809613,0.0052518835,0.00021995968,0.0048349365],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.995808,0.0011561569,0.00047958997,0.0009820972,0.0013630297,0.00021113564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641466,0.00071769353,0.00078377355,0.00032388463,0.0016194911,0.00014049819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032253037,0.0006467495,0.00035203548,0.0010274912,0.0006409373,0.00050213374,0.0008155688,0.0006680374,0.0012813415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004111923,0.0005242379,0.0005322572,0.00043881,0.0008727117,0.0003739594,0.0005288654,0.00073014596,0.0009511018],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006254082,0.000121735226,0.014423725,0.00010425374,0.000020391357,0.000045002365,0.00027253997,0.00045737546,0.9781722,0.00020456266,0.00020152588,0.00591422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004081948,0.0013129339,0.04755043,0.00010216911,0.00008625322,0.0003889137,0.00034108912,0.0063195475,0.937158,0.00015781296,0.006501738,0.000040361545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025488883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064378856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032253037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043123483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008870228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01705718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025890805","doi":"10.1002/edn3.88","title":"Caged fish experiment and hydrodynamic bidimensional modeling highlight the importance to consider 2D dispersion in fluvial environmental DNA studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"GDG Environnement; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Salmo; Environmental science; Brown trout; Dispersion (optics); Fluvial; River ecosystem; Rainbow trout; Abundance (ecology); Hydrology (agriculture); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Ecology; Geology; Ecosystem; Biology; Biodiversity; Physics; Geomorphology; Structural basin","score_opus":0.021733064566484116,"score_gpt":0.22566563136600584,"score_spread":0.20393256679952174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025890805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8624694,0.0002073875,0.1327682,0.0002790092,0.000065512904,0.00011767371,0.0008318272,0.00025404943,0.0030070366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815439,0.00010210743,0.016421422,0.00005548531,0.0000095476535,0.00014618432,0.00027945288,0.000047512127,0.0013944232],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998491,0.00005247366,0.000012842275,0.00005358874,0.000017338683,0.000014712398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994466,0.0003189371,0.000074842865,0.000073291616,0.000057499055,0.000028779194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000552276,0.00039442838,0.0004753443,0.00022200214,0.00023173723,0.0005321537,0.0005428492,0.0006058138,0.0013797954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013938454,0.00022983519,0.00045426507,0.00018233445,0.00031425036,0.0008869248,0.00036411057,0.0003744981,0.00017030266],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069299,0.00011798933,0.023042485,0.00008676158,0.000079435944,0.00012275655,0.0000583663,0.95668495,0.0114260195,0.0019456138,0.00037061915,0.005995585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010631036,0.00007453625,0.007377516,0.000006559849,0.000014461669,0.000015378491,0.000024543464,0.9900343,0.0015066818,0.0004745538,0.00044446992,0.00001633096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013786039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010027151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013786039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004762155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050716044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02741158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031983174","doi":"10.1002/edn3.89","title":"60 specific eDNA qPCR assays to detect invasive, threatened, and exploited freshwater vertebrates and invertebrates in Eastern Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Environmental DNA; Biology; Invasive species; Invertebrate; Ecology; TaqMan; Endangered species; Fishery; Zoology; Habitat; Biodiversity; Polymerase chain reaction","score_opus":0.014958431988792932,"score_gpt":0.16986766416041296,"score_spread":0.15490923217162003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031983174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94825,0.002183447,0.024771255,0.00019108827,0.00005721932,0.0006897427,0.01029285,0.00044893526,0.013115633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89206517,0.0024275973,0.069615066,0.00072295003,0.000013609963,0.0007262234,0.009905431,0.00007198455,0.02445203],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887997,0.00006574032,0.00007161488,0.00028688187,0.0004936806,0.00020218955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987214,0.00012185988,0.00016442074,0.0000328351,0.0008198871,0.00013948843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007423748,0.0007725603,0.00038074344,0.0021979976,0.0010641138,0.0005505132,0.00066381245,0.00033206344,0.0025037252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008890599,0.0003096425,0.000354567,0.0016319987,0.00072924164,0.00019329647,0.000626116,0.00041584723,0.00039443382],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024698992,0.00012808171,0.24349761,0.00063035067,0.00012215467,0.00015999514,0.0021595145,0.0014293147,0.6994339,0.00067456707,0.0014609733,0.05005661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003331698,0.00058534474,0.7758572,0.00020966229,0.00019351629,0.0003297938,0.0032823,0.0037439438,0.19349302,0.00020377891,0.021971613,0.0000965393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56959987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88619655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43040013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004577374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005491753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8658697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036144229","doi":"10.1002/edn3.112","title":"Pathway to Increase Standards and Competency of eDNA Surveys (PISCeS)—Advancing collaboration and standardization efforts in the field of eDNA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Windsor; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Standardization; Environmental DNA; Field (mathematics); Environmental resource management; Library science; Engineering; Ecology; Biology; Political science; Biodiversity; Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.004517643098230186,"score_gpt":0.21435245561259014,"score_spread":0.20983481251435995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036144229","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041859318,0.013823104,0.06317593,0.7901364,0.08604375,0.0017259422,0.002347036,0.0042200563,0.034341887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061586328,0.037661746,0.38193575,0.271067,0.056031913,0.0055281967,0.018626142,0.0066222018,0.16094077],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9227375,0.034314223,0.0061402116,0.0054616993,0.026232747,0.0051135845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6932561,0.049513455,0.016502455,0.021340596,0.16475713,0.054630216],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13333182,0.0017811313,0.0015428711,0.006824401,0.004609082,0.015308215,0.005727237,0.011667595,0.040328085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13099968,0.001412939,0.0018238792,0.002668104,0.003978835,0.012178015,0.03029777,0.014280082,0.0305527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013879633,0.00020006715,0.0022929797,0.0013150959,0.00005266788,0.00028419658,0.0012430142,0.00024831295,0.002732431,0.0074260207,0.7768252,0.20724118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030049085,0.00010657096,0.0020121164,0.0011101206,0.000013435565,0.00016264441,0.00081776007,0.00021178891,0.0012016912,0.004704491,0.98958,0.000049371683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039782696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052155787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86666816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005820531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053366993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7051345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042728572","doi":"10.1002/edn3.111","title":"Comparing environmental metabarcoding and trawling survey of demersal fish communities in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Trawling; Environmental DNA; Demersal zone; Demersal fish; Fishery; Biodiversity; Species richness; Water column; Bottom trawling; Whiting; Fishing; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Vulnerable species; Environmental science; Endangered species; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.040016027275902206,"score_gpt":0.1987654007028483,"score_spread":0.1587493734269461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042728572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985707,0.000102352686,0.00019575296,0.000027210763,0.0000020130606,0.0000134079655,0.00039015943,0.000007960223,0.0006904087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995956,0.00014800661,0.0014901252,0.000049025537,0.000002173611,0.000018699682,0.00074876274,0.000004040343,0.0015831804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995277,0.00003952991,0.000028779143,0.00011760173,0.00019478115,0.00009155086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831885,0.00007298285,0.00021981336,0.000031843007,0.0011960155,0.00016049868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005472544,0.0002668674,0.00020622634,0.0018120196,0.0013766211,0.0004920412,0.0005881977,0.00019548522,0.0004943357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079132937,0.00020015828,0.00018572464,0.0015321136,0.00046211592,0.00021577365,0.0004971267,0.00019960919,0.00010518525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000679676,0.000015054234,0.9849858,0.000032056276,0.000036276397,0.00006447262,0.0008099386,0.00017290663,0.005881612,0.00003771213,0.00017084333,0.007725348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018576882,0.000018818846,0.99773455,0.0000090239655,0.000008308123,0.00002189943,0.0008099812,0.00037125344,0.0005271821,0.0000053228505,0.00048736695,0.0000043139644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94218487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98710316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057815135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073567736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061950297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11631119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043916054","doi":"10.1002/edn3.116","title":"Metabarcoding unsorted kick‐samples facilitates macroinvertebrate‐based biomonitoring with increased taxonomic resolution, while outperforming environmental DNA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Biomonitoring; Environmental DNA; Water quality; Biodiversity; Invertebrate; Taxon; Biology; Sass; Ecology; Taxonomic rank; Environmental science","score_opus":0.028017513719990825,"score_gpt":0.18931618870446262,"score_spread":0.1612986749844718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043916054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85702693,0.0018883616,0.12881984,0.00023792386,0.000101649995,0.0003412401,0.004342784,0.0010652076,0.006175986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.613376,0.001131747,0.37303695,0.00045040544,0.000039360082,0.0002335884,0.004885644,0.0002839017,0.006562401],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917066,0.00012325525,0.000079823556,0.00035275068,0.0002031217,0.00007049471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851066,0.00034082765,0.00047634996,0.00020366602,0.00040016693,0.000068340356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009580416,0.0006891171,0.00047648794,0.0018767822,0.00047559896,0.0012866037,0.00054414244,0.00072624075,0.0026211916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024393117,0.0004270715,0.0005351237,0.0010626192,0.00041937697,0.00082064926,0.000766069,0.00040054828,0.0021647215],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001774167,0.00006754528,0.053547665,0.0005082024,0.00011921978,0.00016003412,0.0004450211,0.000899542,0.88070136,0.00036854408,0.00026365422,0.06274184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034532542,0.0006787312,0.3121038,0.00031219042,0.0003061737,0.0013067262,0.0011645218,0.009758892,0.6440784,0.0010148571,0.029160418,0.00008076494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017955474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010022428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026211916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025838896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004937918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008768797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044345051","doi":"10.1002/edn3.120","title":"Development of an environmental DNA metabarcoding assay for aquatic vascular plant communities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; DNA barcoding; Biology; Taxon; Internal transcribed spacer; Genus; Invasive species; Biodiversity; Ecology; Ribosomal RNA; Gene; Genetics","score_opus":0.030751606812215056,"score_gpt":0.20304924084503667,"score_spread":0.1722976340328216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044345051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6746822,0.0009957333,0.3072569,0.00029813853,0.00009154078,0.0015782873,0.0073278383,0.0020730945,0.005696277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33677262,0.0005960595,0.6485737,0.00037538723,0.00002353669,0.0012945359,0.0070942934,0.00021861967,0.005051241],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.998283,0.0002163818,0.00013618972,0.0006279723,0.0005696727,0.00016682813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987625,0.00023815907,0.00025693732,0.00008464882,0.00053855375,0.00011925313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009601346,0.0008248746,0.0004628343,0.001550379,0.0006081982,0.00067133864,0.00083937997,0.00077094085,0.0010765095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019723189,0.0005798858,0.0004135991,0.0007684211,0.00047189964,0.00042781697,0.0008567085,0.0005676619,0.000867778],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045444573,0.000040141276,0.011824723,0.00012895532,0.000021358555,0.000048860482,0.00014126282,0.00024822538,0.9769438,0.00011595607,0.00016758167,0.010273699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004364474,0.0006664241,0.15377626,0.00011425281,0.0001597005,0.0005771519,0.0003439905,0.014338661,0.8102759,0.00025325816,0.019359704,0.00009107134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011526536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049588673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011526536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081285444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013616262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02291888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080170233","doi":"10.1002/edn3.129","title":"Fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity shapes fluvial fish communities as revealed by eDNA metabarcoding","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Spatial ecology; Relative species abundance; Fluvial; Environmental science; Geography; Fishery; Biology; Structural basin","score_opus":0.016009825941255426,"score_gpt":0.19857204024598063,"score_spread":0.1825622143047252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080170233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99750525,0.00011041058,0.0014326061,0.000010975565,0.0000013682668,0.000009522168,0.00041730318,0.000013405645,0.0004990171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978491,0.00004169189,0.0013072302,0.000025223773,0.0000010649727,0.000011780346,0.0004530705,0.0000059149097,0.00030502802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972934,0.000034529425,0.000016857275,0.00013569332,0.000039232476,0.00004442685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995807,0.00008429876,0.00013119179,0.000027682667,0.0001415458,0.000034563953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029885606,0.00017698226,0.00025121603,0.00133677,0.00045857026,0.00054194056,0.00028240134,0.00023100639,0.0006830902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053199014,0.00016638699,0.00014348203,0.0008605886,0.00042028746,0.00025312405,0.00041443107,0.00013422649,0.00016376581],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120050296,0.000020372505,0.8252614,0.000079624784,0.00010928682,0.00011800821,0.00083207455,0.00047013653,0.16178752,0.00008590137,0.00015843392,0.0109572355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012546968,0.0000141755745,0.99745876,0.0000055488163,0.00001282299,0.00004193208,0.00028556047,0.00054300175,0.0013467867,0.000022091219,0.0002621963,0.0000057733287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058485936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14123702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058485936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045360776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038340874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11629099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087942109","doi":"10.1002/edn3.135","title":"Using environmental DNA for biomonitoring of freshwater fish communities: Comparison with established gillnet surveys in a boreal hydroelectric impoundment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hydro-Québec; GDG Environnement; Université Laval","funders":"EnGlobe; Mitacs; Hydro-Québec","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Abundance (ecology); Relative species abundance; Fishery; Species richness; Ecology; Freshwater fish; Biology; Environmental science; Biodiversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.032603975861205746,"score_gpt":0.23401088864918906,"score_spread":0.2014069127879833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087942109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99929416,0.000031552714,0.00041353513,0.000006379816,0.0000017939253,0.000011278924,0.0000748905,0.000004086802,0.00016237135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972173,0.000052234518,0.0021428717,0.000018257677,0.000005501473,0.000022487244,0.0003027778,0.0000032363027,0.00023539038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913675,0.00018476255,0.000061234045,0.00032871403,0.00020876348,0.00007982298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987627,0.00016072768,0.00048478192,0.000058731355,0.00031826814,0.00021476031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007055586,0.00050014444,0.00023202,0.0015197275,0.0005484024,0.00044132044,0.00050343876,0.00034270337,0.00043910393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014987927,0.00022638279,0.0001962414,0.0008360262,0.0006141687,0.00041327102,0.0005912193,0.00020224781,0.00012681767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009372134,0.00007836823,0.9753607,0.000025592784,0.000028033059,0.00009260756,0.00060879835,0.00011214891,0.018045329,0.000012229473,0.000026173677,0.005516345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020597045,0.00015247885,0.9983582,0.000002579903,0.000009357304,0.00006920345,0.0002715843,0.00022223468,0.000829985,0.0000036818699,0.00007499587,0.0000036015322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032815345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10829883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032815345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006370215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042777148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06524867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090589826","doi":"10.1002/edn3.139","title":"Hidden introductions of freshwater red algae via the aquarium trade exposed by DNA barcodes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan","keywords":"DNA barcoding; Biodiversity; Biology; Algae; Freshwater ecosystem; Ecology; Aquatic ecosystem; Fishery; Ecosystem; Geography","score_opus":0.010429782657077048,"score_gpt":0.17520579193400374,"score_spread":0.16477600927692668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090589826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965706,0.00014437424,0.0016011709,0.00008636319,0.000010270431,0.000007595884,0.00026790999,0.000014364695,0.0012974545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978934,0.00005730572,0.0011843254,0.000071238785,0.0000037156294,0.0000065065283,0.00017297981,0.000002560968,0.00060798484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945503,0.00011757671,0.000027641227,0.00017081421,0.00012952866,0.000099427925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819726,0.00028712634,0.0010942129,0.0001262068,0.00020419886,0.00009096474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004419134,0.00017978117,0.00012388467,0.001266009,0.0003784863,0.00048348273,0.00027914677,0.00037090725,0.0016465262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010472633,0.000113090966,0.00014123617,0.0015642927,0.0006231234,0.00057397515,0.0007879546,0.00032010046,0.0002169185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015396783,0.000042139378,0.8571712,0.00013947162,0.00006464968,0.0008280337,0.004587441,0.00036696324,0.09441905,0.0012395503,0.00045622993,0.04053133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005045907,0.00014150846,0.9642001,0.00009941392,0.000052514206,0.00075024925,0.006849471,0.0014954165,0.01779871,0.00061977876,0.007961036,0.000026680018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043178336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008669644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043178336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045997472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029664132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008585393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093962070","doi":"10.1002/edn3.155","title":"Detecting community change in Arctic marine ecosystems using the temporal dynamics of environmental DNA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Churchill Northern Studies Centre; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"ArcticNet; Polar Knowledge Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biomonitoring; Ecology; Temporal scales; Abundance (ecology); Ecosystem; Marine ecosystem; Arctic; Environmental change; Biology; Environmental science; Geography; Biodiversity; Climate change","score_opus":0.03387178436375033,"score_gpt":0.21414923576876435,"score_spread":0.18027745140501403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093962070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960551,0.00036206812,0.0019172198,0.000041213556,0.000006509064,0.000012039198,0.0006390188,0.000014952477,0.0009517661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99463356,0.00023794321,0.003993387,0.000049101465,0.000003849766,0.000016320279,0.00055362453,0.000005774126,0.0005065139],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997068,0.000035929083,0.000013077005,0.00009318601,0.000091249865,0.000059675855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925643,0.00009719488,0.00020191634,0.000023368184,0.00033381363,0.00008724499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049481733,0.00021551727,0.00023283307,0.0014411145,0.0007796186,0.0006806938,0.0003108866,0.00024951523,0.00049820764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009160064,0.00013550889,0.00017512697,0.001523716,0.00037139162,0.00030209427,0.00051554496,0.00022867188,0.00009724412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012591602,0.000030804506,0.88298625,0.00011393392,0.00011643474,0.000077045755,0.0010648712,0.0007466434,0.09448695,0.00014291386,0.00014108798,0.01996707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001189356,0.000034369386,0.993916,0.00001654619,0.000023622568,0.00003730292,0.00096454,0.0008871745,0.0030651789,0.000063558575,0.0009833575,0.0000073053093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19273308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42129272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19273308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013762036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011056751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38322252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094519479","doi":"10.1002/edn3.150","title":"Allometric scaling of eDNA production in stream‐dwelling brook trout (<i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i>) inferred from population size structure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; U.S. Geological Survey; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Allometry; Salvelinus; Trout; Biomass (ecology); STREAMS; Biology; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Scaling; Habitat; Relative species abundance; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009980586766796785,"score_gpt":0.18975658288940245,"score_spread":0.17977599612260567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094519479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99789137,0.000032879856,0.0016486802,0.000013968115,0.0000013217727,0.0000022471272,0.00016180142,0.000022941887,0.00022474467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887246,0.000014631961,0.0007898351,0.000006580403,0.000002102908,0.0000043585655,0.00025304785,0.0000075274647,0.00004936757],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976844,0.000062415864,0.000017130496,0.000105643805,0.000031888572,0.000014372483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991788,0.00026122178,0.0002618194,0.00010768908,0.0001482549,0.000042084423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009008349,0.00020552556,0.00019813527,0.00080531626,0.00021570864,0.00047824756,0.00026688672,0.0001824602,0.0006606121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002015627,0.00020325209,0.00036035344,0.00053308246,0.0003388284,0.00048789478,0.00042324298,0.0002346769,0.00013345042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090247995,0.000026236501,0.9445904,0.00003956157,0.0001861688,0.00005968095,0.00020797848,0.0145298345,0.031653482,0.00032445294,0.00021791115,0.008074128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005005748,0.000019569103,0.9463025,0.000005476064,0.000024698391,0.00005960211,0.0000795706,0.050881233,0.0018815862,0.00047510045,0.00025086052,0.000014854612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064700516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006628765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064700516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005584472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017915621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0128647685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107492607","doi":"10.1002/edn3.164","title":"The need for robust qPCR‐based eDNA detection assays in environmental monitoring and species inventories","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Innovate BC","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Workflow; Biology; Biodiversity; Environmental monitoring; Environmental resource management; Transparency (behavior); Limiting; Risk analysis (engineering); Ecology; Computer science; Engineering; Business; Environmental science","score_opus":0.02277426875810653,"score_gpt":0.18755288401934733,"score_spread":0.1647786152612408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107492607","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030937953,0.008830484,0.9286503,0.01426646,0.001372632,0.00091063406,0.0026591534,0.0010146227,0.011357868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14141521,0.00353966,0.8413202,0.0060542617,0.00044248745,0.0011848361,0.0013897651,0.0002545956,0.004398999],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9246743,0.044704437,0.004468657,0.009443677,0.01542108,0.0012879812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8505641,0.0737514,0.019999662,0.015246175,0.038378984,0.0020596432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09608913,0.0013575805,0.0018371161,0.0034816836,0.0012956058,0.00791192,0.00470081,0.005637141,0.0031886008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08006098,0.00114062,0.0014059526,0.0029079916,0.0058835195,0.0072851623,0.0040319455,0.0064592715,0.0020100924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006015147,0.0005481369,0.07966083,0.006772458,0.00053386326,0.00043573682,0.0019443575,0.03267332,0.34683847,0.11184083,0.012260179,0.40589032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001099361,0.0017931573,0.043317333,0.005009836,0.00046076512,0.0011111839,0.0039352896,0.059329208,0.40324005,0.15193063,0.32921788,0.00054474425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003792544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073821987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09608913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036428876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077750348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50817394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108093312","doi":"10.1002/edn3.165","title":"Linking bacterial diversity to floral identity in the bumble bee pollen basket","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Pollen; Pollinator; Operational taxonomic unit; Botany; Alpha diversity; Biodiversity; Ecology; Pollination; Bacteria; 16S ribosomal RNA","score_opus":0.0399915656031817,"score_gpt":0.19008646161472464,"score_spread":0.15009489601154294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108093312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991228,0.0003062816,0.0001531451,0.000010528214,0.0000021809753,0.000004096996,0.00024288766,0.000005290593,0.00015286756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989114,0.00013268301,0.00037092765,0.000016173812,0.000004201808,0.000009222005,0.0003849387,0.0000028540064,0.00016762885],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998171,0.000026741676,0.00001410591,0.00006066764,0.000037237314,0.00004430851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948716,0.000077063225,0.0002339304,0.000025175825,0.000084972875,0.00009171126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018400533,0.00030222014,0.00033626126,0.0015699099,0.0004636514,0.0007812767,0.00016002877,0.00037060684,0.0013582542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006109439,0.00019740305,0.00017519244,0.00096670736,0.00020965029,0.00027759976,0.0005443894,0.00025826952,0.00026117786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041899405,0.000047107438,0.7007746,0.0001193492,0.00012405892,0.00015079713,0.0004386941,0.00012200435,0.2868346,0.000040120845,0.00015210109,0.010777527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017331697,0.0000423248,0.99780864,0.000007175873,0.000011363982,0.000090799695,0.000116843905,0.00018262344,0.0015933913,0.000014463764,0.000127347,0.0000033148433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022430813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036412142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022430813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001915005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007861731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0045437813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111285500","doi":"10.1002/edn3.172","title":"Improved efficiency in eDNA metabarcoding of benthic metazoans by sieving sediments prior to DNA extraction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Benthic zone; Environmental DNA; Biology; Phylum; Taxon; Sediment; Ecology; Pelagic zone; Paleontology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.01253798665147007,"score_gpt":0.2169744131667935,"score_spread":0.20443642651532343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111285500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8636097,0.0023927658,0.12966652,0.00028720568,0.00014286992,0.0002873059,0.00085501134,0.0011465603,0.0016121338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5818673,0.002490038,0.4071597,0.00058438187,0.000064806634,0.00033995422,0.0031327477,0.00037732167,0.003983858],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985421,0.00029607015,0.00021726768,0.00037182134,0.00044388295,0.00012897936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982987,0.0006885258,0.00027626328,0.00022332896,0.00043201435,0.00008123528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018493051,0.0010538442,0.0008198539,0.0011437606,0.00028949353,0.0009919093,0.00059767446,0.0005625477,0.0010948818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003066045,0.00082255487,0.0006255526,0.0008067552,0.00043637515,0.0004933606,0.0009466386,0.0007039641,0.0009523464],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001730297,0.000086542765,0.008786046,0.0002279281,0.000053513784,0.00007497729,0.00011024911,0.00047379284,0.9614999,0.000039912637,0.0001737692,0.028300283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037141228,0.00052155496,0.07048704,0.00009483531,0.00014431286,0.00051069807,0.00013914479,0.007529396,0.9145797,0.00010053872,0.0058065373,0.00004905617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009117841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003423166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018493051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016771622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031303425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0097801685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111891248","doi":"10.1002/edn3.174","title":"Comparing CRISPR‐Cas and qPCR eDNA assays for the detection of Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i> L.)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; University of New Brunswick; Université Laval","funders":"Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Salmo; CRISPR; Biology; Computational biology; Environmental DNA; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Gene; Genetics; Ecology","score_opus":0.02010587619325833,"score_gpt":0.20494878434696523,"score_spread":0.1848429081537069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111891248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9068217,0.00086482207,0.08401194,0.00026923482,0.000105461935,0.0002677316,0.002364194,0.0006375673,0.0046572457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9000748,0.00053458853,0.08947931,0.00044755914,0.000015792712,0.00041030816,0.0027399412,0.0001016155,0.006196083],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978922,0.0003636607,0.00019643897,0.0005670928,0.00076645234,0.00021420798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998038,0.00074714405,0.0003437536,0.0001310313,0.00063776807,0.000102323065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020653757,0.00045080285,0.00046604907,0.0006972313,0.000345442,0.0006756851,0.00067876175,0.00054177246,0.0010504308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023675573,0.0003310352,0.0006679763,0.00030177992,0.0006951553,0.000298349,0.00060391653,0.0005748344,0.00044861314],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007080678,0.00003173017,0.0055047856,0.00009048503,0.000025713527,0.000015296342,0.00008279257,0.0005230062,0.989181,0.000110236855,0.000109273264,0.004255006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000098250075,0.000434188,0.03211263,0.000023302937,0.00006716166,0.00011336477,0.00022821239,0.0040683155,0.96079963,0.000087428576,0.002018099,0.00003789625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012265041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04459011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012265041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010745258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010503578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0243873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112053409","doi":"10.1002/edn3.171","title":"Lateral and longitudinal fish environmental DNA distribution in dynamic riverine habitats","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Habitat; River ecosystem; Environmental science; Fish migration; Biology; Ecology; Freshwater fish; Snow; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Hydrology (agriculture); Fishery; Biodiversity; Geography; Geology","score_opus":0.008022807901971707,"score_gpt":0.18432948995684245,"score_spread":0.17630668205487074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112053409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99957997,0.00002242136,0.0001807404,0.0000018408664,2.7701762e-7,0.0000016496825,0.00006352728,0.0000030317747,0.00014657307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908304,0.000017047652,0.00037046729,0.0000052049063,5.8811906e-7,0.000009575241,0.00014689993,0.0000020224547,0.00036511524],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999075,0.0000117015725,0.0000053953786,0.000048337974,0.000013322704,0.000013705636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997371,0.000040915802,0.000117720294,0.000009768233,0.000047298327,0.000047138285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012811247,0.00012660501,0.000118839744,0.00038494344,0.00015278815,0.00023969302,0.000109983695,0.0001492539,0.0009660319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023483313,0.00014305224,0.00008735835,0.00016938378,0.00028835807,0.00016624742,0.00038329873,0.00015147087,0.0001428136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036556297,0.00004389325,0.45778826,0.000052924774,0.00003812839,0.00007746027,0.0004551636,0.00041776267,0.5343091,0.000054758933,0.000046767815,0.006350222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004046693,0.00024643276,0.9919887,0.000004353998,0.000010606609,0.00007427745,0.00024194164,0.00054448243,0.0066915248,0.000019423924,0.00016919235,0.00000486624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019736981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005048187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019736981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017851964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010213726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0039244294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137682792","doi":"10.1002/edn3.189","title":"A validation scale to determine the readiness of environmental DNA assays for routine species monitoring","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":221,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; European Cooperation in Science and Technology","keywords":"Environmental DNA; In silico; Scale (ratio); Sampling (signal processing); Computational biology; Data mining; Computer science; Biology; Ecology; Cartography; Genetics; Geography; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.019120461583121834,"score_gpt":0.21323408972070879,"score_spread":0.19411362813758695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137682792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.676631,0.002779471,0.2256064,0.0023542047,0.0005708409,0.007259574,0.031559296,0.0027925854,0.05044671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.770228,0.00072355766,0.18507858,0.00049799157,0.00012988209,0.008296785,0.032375082,0.0003227773,0.0023473583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.93691665,0.023754645,0.010222822,0.0051073306,0.022010926,0.001987638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6998164,0.15651503,0.030924214,0.029215686,0.08068452,0.0028441134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.090046585,0.0010373283,0.0009557314,0.0056727505,0.0014046966,0.004467892,0.002584845,0.0014481994,0.004226674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1898172,0.00043820927,0.0022133621,0.005454901,0.0019889693,0.0038860857,0.0038393945,0.0017833234,0.0022167703],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017854396,0.00067403313,0.62197,0.005570588,0.000746044,0.00041566865,0.0047964123,0.018339593,0.021456458,0.014557089,0.025223497,0.28446516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025663356,0.003382087,0.746845,0.003076804,0.0005953637,0.00061093253,0.0059258463,0.04515877,0.037546873,0.010423271,0.14583188,0.00034666303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022641367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002074244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090046585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00234526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030547713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47621757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165660295","doi":"10.1002/edn3.198","title":"Prolonged impacts of past agriculture and ungulate overabundance on soil fungal communities in restored forests","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Welfare Foundation; Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology; Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province","keywords":"Reforestation; Species richness; Ecology; Biodiversity; Community structure; Forest restoration; Vegetation (pathology); Ungulate; Afforestation; Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Ecological succession; Geography; Forest ecology; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.006970313961579137,"score_gpt":0.18094340736123665,"score_spread":0.17397309339965752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165660295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99983835,0.00005562157,0.000027312215,0.0000021045764,3.938976e-7,6.002362e-7,0.000020552034,7.5718583e-7,0.00005426899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997893,0.000027977901,0.00006472649,0.000004777402,8.09406e-7,0.0000011904864,0.0000499253,3.9046853e-7,0.000060922277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999824,0.000039923383,0.00001215702,0.000046443296,0.000023856628,0.000053737494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999616,0.00004484633,0.00017435706,0.000028536633,0.00006135668,0.00007488818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025061003,0.00014572438,0.00019035905,0.00037308165,0.00037695724,0.00038615818,0.0001589416,0.00015970637,0.0007404626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003433607,0.00008298271,0.00011559218,0.00023361048,0.0003622862,0.00021175973,0.00032398026,0.00020460637,0.00007382477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007976952,0.00016436233,0.80923784,0.000068814035,0.00009882965,0.00037965283,0.000968183,0.0004032811,0.1729022,0.000085865184,0.00006689841,0.0148264505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013921625,0.00010812528,0.99753237,0.000004082524,0.000008519493,0.000091212605,0.0003736916,0.00019304996,0.0015278471,0.000021695163,0.0001358333,0.0000020411094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033339951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011949804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033339951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026490656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017218498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006629169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166490348","doi":"10.1002/edn3.220","title":"A statistical model for calibration and computation of detection and quantification limits for low copy number environmental DNA samples","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Sample (material); Calibration; Statistical model; Statistics; Computer science; Data mining; Biology; Mathematics; Ecology; Biodiversity; Chromatography","score_opus":0.025752393694559776,"score_gpt":0.2415516179943898,"score_spread":0.21579922429983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166490348","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007961563,0.00011886067,0.9905634,0.00018210353,0.000022707987,0.000057960387,0.00012743875,0.0002747631,0.0006912918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6212969,0.00080376514,0.36543566,0.0004858429,0.00013185845,0.0016359492,0.0013813912,0.00030995015,0.00851866],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937371,0.0027302734,0.00027261738,0.0014691985,0.0014252358,0.00036566428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96489835,0.028142314,0.0023060641,0.0011647628,0.003252132,0.00023646283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013762183,0.0016126045,0.0016863549,0.0023874764,0.00071831414,0.002464349,0.0036974384,0.002920749,0.0025060982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040247392,0.0010661214,0.0019747496,0.0015511601,0.0026673006,0.0022985896,0.0016963045,0.0037332312,0.0012886365],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006686811,0.000055582408,0.0024081373,0.000114915005,0.00006833063,0.00011680827,0.00014420775,0.9391004,0.002533969,0.038360972,0.0006697128,0.016360097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045625065,0.000023749939,0.00032265575,0.000015874979,0.0000097819875,0.000024553061,0.000009594983,0.99026453,0.00053010543,0.008402906,0.0003746945,0.000016921742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008510353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003712796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013762183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025915722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002218122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07278222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168150887","doi":"10.1002/edn3.221","title":"Fish community shifts along a strong fluvial environmental gradient revealed by eDNA metabarcoding","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Estuary; Fluvial; Biodiversity; Ecology; Brackish water; Habitat; Fish migration; Geography; Coastal fish; River ecosystem; Community structure; Marine habitats; Fishery; Biology; Coral reef fish; Salinity","score_opus":0.014247321176009842,"score_gpt":0.19945249073966326,"score_spread":0.1852051695636534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168150887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984327,0.000055495137,0.0007470202,0.000009996955,0.0000011264219,0.000006947462,0.00028526987,0.0000068625213,0.00045471566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788743,0.000036328787,0.0013142969,0.000026060108,9.646973e-7,0.000012172775,0.00027792543,0.0000024502028,0.00044240264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998493,0.00002616561,0.00001023448,0.000055909524,0.00002740321,0.00003093409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996668,0.000055357297,0.00011426615,0.000017927427,0.000104936946,0.000040695206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027277286,0.000131228,0.00014362301,0.00110854,0.00040568245,0.00028070566,0.00018285833,0.00017069138,0.0006424647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000358791,0.000097320095,0.00009174692,0.0007897493,0.00028414195,0.00015278539,0.00034907353,0.00011971576,0.00010528129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001235034,0.000017261558,0.8352278,0.000042323318,0.00004953697,0.0001667707,0.00079613243,0.0002035992,0.15419324,0.00006769333,0.00009833965,0.009013773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.392309e-7,0.000020706255,0.9980274,0.0000031823006,0.000006907487,0.000054458746,0.00025210978,0.00016212084,0.001227533,0.000011326868,0.00023061757,0.0000030486985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02976231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12493149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02976231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003939605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025492013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059178114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175518271","doi":"10.1002/edn3.224","title":"Proper environmental DNA metabarcoding data transformation reveals temporal stability of fish communities in a dendritic river system","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université Laval","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Tributary; Habitat; Relative species abundance; Sampling (signal processing); Biology; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.039688581736051394,"score_gpt":0.21753323887513418,"score_spread":0.1778446571390828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175518271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931062,0.00005956684,0.004761112,0.000030971172,0.0000020789364,0.000019434774,0.0010654178,0.000031816977,0.0009233027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99217063,0.000045323355,0.0058753863,0.000026075882,0.0000012460139,0.00002420438,0.0011693395,0.000016319129,0.0006714238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996823,0.000053868967,0.000022055641,0.00013045041,0.000058493344,0.000052889256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890506,0.00019442086,0.00029634393,0.00008748972,0.00044398927,0.00007260814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043103308,0.00011384001,0.00015357132,0.00090306514,0.0005720799,0.00048179552,0.00029963205,0.00013155385,0.0011071555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001971193,0.00009568909,0.00011495507,0.0013397257,0.0003442332,0.00022041526,0.00038551746,0.00020465828,0.00025005487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011098396,0.00002095244,0.9134388,0.000049639122,0.000054384294,0.00010242474,0.00077562354,0.00068420207,0.06585854,0.00017288997,0.00029479494,0.018436765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014957324,0.00001871063,0.99406743,0.0000071405593,0.000013422351,0.000050721024,0.0004862612,0.0015550443,0.0029099344,0.000060058283,0.0008234347,0.0000063405605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13113974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35617235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13113974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000852988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079867704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26075286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185211517","doi":"10.1002/edn3.239","title":"Community eDNA metabarcoding as a detection tool for documenting freshwater mussel (Unionidae) species assemblages","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biology; Species richness; Unionidae; Ecology; Habitat; Mussel; Introduced species; Invasive species; Quadrat; Biodiversity; Bivalvia; Mollusca","score_opus":0.016295879241671488,"score_gpt":0.21752869538214478,"score_spread":0.20123281614047328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185211517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9339185,0.0010605752,0.061890006,0.000061998144,0.00002039899,0.00016328167,0.0007147395,0.00057443907,0.0015962009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77576786,0.00030676048,0.22160867,0.00009698751,0.000007671784,0.00022274806,0.0007814962,0.0000466721,0.0011611446],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987501,0.00038835322,0.00010068136,0.00040011018,0.00029512643,0.000065549735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859685,0.00039462396,0.00045564456,0.000085751824,0.00034731213,0.00011966235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013803908,0.0005181805,0.00037049042,0.0018312548,0.00044678382,0.0005708936,0.00044153922,0.0004820753,0.000784912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020183155,0.00042411857,0.00023763324,0.0006129327,0.00040410765,0.00049549626,0.00071628427,0.00032467782,0.00029795477],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020535765,0.00006923221,0.069582015,0.0002073478,0.0000429752,0.00007405803,0.00027264896,0.0004528679,0.9008734,0.00013904765,0.00011485766,0.02796618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034930734,0.0010700298,0.40694973,0.00016496406,0.00017131069,0.0011945508,0.0006123211,0.022346916,0.5615533,0.00028686528,0.0055218376,0.00009319305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015043368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047767246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018312548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025452426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032467194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0073002577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187900929","doi":"10.1002/edn3.245","title":"DNA metabarcoding marker choice skews perception of marine eukaryotic biodiversity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia; United States Agency for International Development; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Phylum; Biology; Biodiversity; Taxonomic rank; DNA barcoding; Evolutionary biology; 18S ribosomal RNA; Ecology; Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I; Environmental DNA; Range (aeronautics); Abundance (ecology); Phylogenetics; Phylogenetic tree; Genetics; Gene; Taxon","score_opus":0.012922717560849579,"score_gpt":0.1976457125751617,"score_spread":0.1847229950143121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187900929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98527294,0.00055884884,0.0125871105,0.000051711788,0.000023790473,0.000020526104,0.0003596174,0.00009588631,0.0010296383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98407906,0.00021777388,0.014327805,0.00014134267,0.000011264796,0.0000361378,0.00071071123,0.000062866304,0.00041303664],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760544,0.00055649114,0.00019907487,0.00081017107,0.0006687163,0.00016012813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611914,0.0014428359,0.0012235296,0.00032928167,0.0007566721,0.00012849558],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002296608,0.00036693763,0.00048923114,0.0012085296,0.00045553516,0.001427899,0.00045791507,0.00058866205,0.00080863317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005451017,0.00032243188,0.00025330315,0.0010958074,0.0005758585,0.00075397803,0.0011737959,0.00043401337,0.00044579833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000523627,0.00006068108,0.35128757,0.00026081302,0.00017663301,0.000095411946,0.0009859694,0.0009646247,0.6169761,0.00036809992,0.00025163052,0.02804883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135856835,0.0005181221,0.7935718,0.00013369592,0.00020548457,0.00054153515,0.0012575464,0.009018944,0.18971844,0.00080253376,0.0041496023,0.00006876494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010117206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027024406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029102634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016537865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012145817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193846102","doi":"10.1002/edn3.233","title":"Environmental DNA as a detection and quantitative tool for stream‐dwelling salamanders: A comparison with the traditional active search method","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval","funders":"Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Salamander; Environmental DNA; Biology; Ecology; Taxon; STREAMS; Caudata; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.03537685282525588,"score_gpt":0.2620535977204875,"score_spread":0.2266767448952316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193846102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9541275,0.0036645618,0.038382493,0.00014323379,0.00006677514,0.00019878308,0.0008087841,0.00012233303,0.0024855542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9336593,0.0014215119,0.06016346,0.00028622628,0.000039215713,0.00016277265,0.0006039513,0.000018183458,0.0036454215],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977825,0.0005362187,0.000094062685,0.00053859,0.00096419494,0.000084468724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729735,0.0009193391,0.00052779185,0.00012716539,0.0010116213,0.00011685667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020359822,0.00051156967,0.00031570074,0.0017670711,0.00030538766,0.0008786278,0.00056138297,0.00062733726,0.00080803357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026710252,0.00027943676,0.00028273297,0.0007627353,0.0008705756,0.0005058892,0.00055116846,0.00048481417,0.00026247895],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050957216,0.00021225412,0.3201287,0.00058273,0.00024486618,0.00011287798,0.00074752653,0.0010375998,0.5975715,0.00037436828,0.00017381174,0.07830424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041387906,0.0034993296,0.66858375,0.00018912452,0.00039196032,0.0007861446,0.0014079406,0.011970936,0.3050844,0.00031717977,0.0075918124,0.00013604367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015857292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058924522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015857292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096253527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005707548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031529963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207772534","doi":"10.1002/edn3.254","title":"Distribution of the boreal chorus frog (<i>Pseudacris maculata</i>) in an urban environment using environmental DNA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Sherbrooke; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Boreal; Environmental DNA; Ecology; Wetland; Range (aeronautics); Local extinction; Taiga; Geography; Habitat; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biology; Physical geography; Biological dispersal; Biodiversity; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.011014033941895308,"score_gpt":0.19785492587927825,"score_spread":0.18684089193738293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207772534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990146,0.00007887471,0.00022496333,0.000020523628,0.0000013508159,0.000008166321,0.00029701478,0.0000044147196,0.0003501116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994671,0.000029593193,0.00022757579,0.0000095694995,0.0000011299,0.00000400393,0.0001461469,9.131981e-7,0.00011398388],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996495,0.0000806054,0.000013280252,0.00012431372,0.00007775793,0.000054502438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986966,0.0001366807,0.0005752837,0.000049338447,0.00033819798,0.00020386581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000520241,0.00014287012,0.00012997951,0.0008900448,0.00040317146,0.00043413174,0.00032003637,0.00017215198,0.0009784255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084287924,0.00009622401,0.00013939104,0.0007630996,0.0004157016,0.00016740068,0.0002398572,0.00021672809,0.00008097428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026127223,0.000006102357,0.9967224,0.00000748135,0.000023888526,0.000027168351,0.00009777702,0.00008492665,0.0012032676,0.000016238148,0.000052498028,0.0017321121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.718084e-7,0.000016890994,0.99935037,0.000004792637,0.0000055101077,0.00004305232,0.00016574065,0.00023383302,0.000069031455,0.00000376635,0.00010360763,0.0000023717719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5391041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74911034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5391041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017736439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007363394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9272204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212762999","doi":"10.1002/edn3.264","title":"eDNA metabarcoding as a means to assess distribution of subterranean fish communities: Iranian blind cave fishes as a case study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund; Shahrekord University; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mohammed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cave; Biology; Environmental DNA; Habitat; Ecology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.05377462174616674,"score_gpt":0.26386844191237124,"score_spread":0.2100938201662045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212762999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99769694,0.00031048965,0.0013104018,0.000053384018,0.000005893457,0.000041719053,0.00013146571,0.000010084406,0.00043958356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99291384,0.00031207874,0.006205714,0.000051550607,0.000007521366,0.000025120595,0.00018765939,0.000005225393,0.0002913283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959916,0.0000733626,0.000037132362,0.00011495914,0.00010436957,0.00007101696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996164,0.00006338248,0.00012953463,0.000032509346,0.00011307276,0.0000450631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007170174,0.00041916154,0.00031750454,0.0024810631,0.00074342935,0.0003963144,0.00045270709,0.00047451217,0.0005202695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067886466,0.000194667,0.00036805612,0.0013530866,0.0006606077,0.0002926295,0.000544309,0.00030392522,0.0000902322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014212794,0.000097758224,0.93456095,0.00024408007,0.00009599421,0.0071921377,0.0031042255,0.00032061944,0.025840338,0.00013345487,0.000249114,0.028019264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008289678,0.000283069,0.976538,0.00007443987,0.0001297982,0.00808021,0.0062292144,0.0013613681,0.0051226905,0.00017465276,0.0019613155,0.000036896545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017770667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0483245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017770667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003622363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054311886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035334468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215497431","doi":"10.1002/edn3.404","title":"Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> survey of the Winter Salmonosphere in the Gulf of Alaska","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tula Foundation; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Pacific Salmon Foundation; Mitacs","keywords":"Predation; Fishery; Marine ecosystem; Oceanography; Ecosystem; Apex predator; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Geology","score_opus":0.014057239710881114,"score_gpt":0.19934803329078435,"score_spread":0.18529079357990325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215497431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99753296,0.00007669647,0.00013998731,0.000016483142,0.000003852356,0.0000053769836,0.0014325202,0.000007620838,0.00078449043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646556,0.000104521234,0.00052712613,0.000025277717,0.0000033433525,0.000013201052,0.001839287,0.000002483015,0.0010192503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989784,0.000011277657,0.0000137269035,0.00003511417,0.000026704844,0.000015392723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996289,0.000026979822,0.00010596485,0.000015003119,0.0001444504,0.00007871463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002520449,0.00015339117,0.000097187476,0.0010086164,0.00053928763,0.0003296448,0.00014371685,0.00018135722,0.0009052438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027021472,0.000089835885,0.000121598925,0.0010213509,0.00015042204,0.0001414177,0.00044380146,0.00015334408,0.00022935469],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022661065,0.0000143735515,0.99165994,0.000017458387,0.0000127281055,0.00009690899,0.00038280358,0.000111389025,0.0039690305,0.000011941792,0.00012456338,0.0035762163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.030071e-7,0.000029844055,0.99720144,0.000011345311,0.000008298238,0.00006108083,0.0012372603,0.00015348192,0.0005115713,0.000014108726,0.0007682741,0.0000025437118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056227386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109421976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056227386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035026958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043370613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111800194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216467410","doi":"10.1002/edn3.261","title":"Targeted next‐generation sequencing of environmental DNA improves detection of invasive European green crab ( <i>Carcinus maenas</i> )","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Carcinus maenas; Environmental DNA; Biology; DNA sequencing; Fishery; Ecology; Biodiversity; Crustacean; DNA; Decapoda; Genetics","score_opus":0.018837274312241196,"score_gpt":0.17531825306284055,"score_spread":0.15648097875059935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216467410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97646844,0.00041278877,0.020772899,0.00013233884,0.000019042867,0.00003448382,0.0006916149,0.00029748422,0.0011707561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715361,0.00016877716,0.0258318,0.00031252706,0.000007742654,0.00003563455,0.0007700507,0.000045476427,0.0012919224],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993488,0.0001451392,0.00002944469,0.0002482358,0.00018033793,0.000047973692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919707,0.00023058287,0.00023888065,0.000056019937,0.00020990746,0.00006765264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007392696,0.0003317157,0.00023576844,0.0005447265,0.00016576337,0.00054167124,0.00021356599,0.00043958644,0.00074004073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013231963,0.00016272602,0.00029393783,0.00023253955,0.00031491317,0.0003007927,0.0003654383,0.00033450365,0.00032624815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008835936,0.000036298872,0.03179987,0.00007782797,0.000032854776,0.000030206767,0.00010617249,0.0014326713,0.95533985,0.00008517623,0.00011850906,0.010852277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001264994,0.00067540706,0.388212,0.00004751989,0.00009167826,0.0002744205,0.00032988767,0.018704692,0.5854855,0.00025402583,0.0058635403,0.000048597823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034847853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008273428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034847853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041556783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003232737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0069289804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217457303","doi":"10.1002/edn3.266","title":"Effect of biotic and abiotic factors on the production and degradation of fish environmental DNA: An experimental evaluation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Abiotic component; Perch; Ecology; Biotic component; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Environmental science; Fishery; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.015162862369210686,"score_gpt":0.2235679632135156,"score_spread":0.2084051008443049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217457303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972404,0.00010316314,0.0015509021,0.000021169992,0.00001927923,0.000291205,0.0002365988,0.000011982613,0.00052534806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822824,0.00026681088,0.008150659,0.00013022336,0.000017728787,0.0012266934,0.0007270293,0.000025365518,0.007173151],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907196,0.00014646424,0.0000763305,0.00028884353,0.00026301033,0.00015345441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984969,0.00037505938,0.0002830967,0.00019913365,0.00036902248,0.00027692065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007626223,0.0006089256,0.00037786676,0.00031625747,0.00064992765,0.00038401777,0.00043256488,0.00047464023,0.0023980709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077410054,0.00028912642,0.00047113397,0.00025937628,0.0009333111,0.00023047376,0.00050493557,0.00078799174,0.00024346974],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002274302,0.0021473712,0.0070169647,0.000118913435,0.000045017136,0.00007626205,0.00029505356,0.00039706935,0.9835031,0.000053444084,0.000056911715,0.0040155607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002481573,0.06210633,0.16630544,0.000028732211,0.00026733993,0.0001656199,0.0007877486,0.0028160794,0.7644335,0.00012879279,0.0026043968,0.00010790133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020397227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05173091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020397227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011395654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011730398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040556967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210822164","doi":"10.1002/edn3.283","title":"Tracking the prevalence of a fungal pathogen, <i>Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis</i> (chytrid fungus), using environmental DNA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Chytridiomycosis; Zoospore; Chytridiomycota; Biology; Abiotic component; Environmental DNA; Amphibian; Ecology; Biotic component; Fungus; Environment variable; Spore; Biodiversity; Microbiology; Botany","score_opus":0.01359116544856872,"score_gpt":0.19508871596341412,"score_spread":0.1814975505148454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210822164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99820626,0.00005954311,0.00054746214,0.000010990257,0.0000011011778,0.000016537031,0.0005843685,0.000012125745,0.0005615662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710757,0.00007374848,0.0016668327,0.000021608506,8.455555e-7,0.000014651672,0.000543704,0.0000019247277,0.00056913274],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986386,0.000012020576,0.0000066356392,0.000058036236,0.000036659905,0.000022708835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996953,0.000025109895,0.00013031483,0.000010945373,0.00008464154,0.000053776355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001307991,0.00015062801,0.00008203854,0.00038899021,0.00031413743,0.00036845036,0.00015934175,0.00013613964,0.00039975598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023661317,0.00011247655,0.00006484988,0.00036502533,0.00023175357,0.00015930196,0.00018552678,0.00012349203,0.00010804214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000785883,0.000021478414,0.89770365,0.000039098817,0.000021304359,0.000029249304,0.000364714,0.00021921816,0.09314007,0.000022086579,0.00011566327,0.008244813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001539526,0.000048120146,0.9959144,0.0000055151263,0.000006066078,0.000019786381,0.0002048115,0.0002617716,0.0031190913,0.000006828723,0.00040968336,0.0000023411028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18095055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50531304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18095055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011000464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005460409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35979462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213006239","doi":"10.1002/edn3.286","title":"Environmental DNA detection and abundance estimates comparable to conventional methods for three freshwater larval species at a power plant discharge","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Electric Power Research Institute","keywords":"Alewife; Dorosoma; Gizzard shad; Netting; Environmental DNA; Biology; Fishery; Ichthyoplankton; Abundance (ecology); Perch; Ecology; Relative species abundance; Sampling (signal processing); Biodiversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.015988489405540013,"score_gpt":0.23352606345856033,"score_spread":0.21753757405302032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213006239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93712354,0.00031565598,0.055170007,0.000056439905,0.00003978351,0.0003300449,0.0020106582,0.00024731434,0.0047066575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92392635,0.0002556902,0.068555355,0.00013347923,0.000018762286,0.0004108871,0.0016268104,0.000027204936,0.0050455723],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987204,0.00013871967,0.00010501913,0.00050406903,0.0004597913,0.00007200808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998958,0.00021379456,0.00031892137,0.000051448427,0.00041496294,0.00004279869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008291095,0.0006324183,0.0002008781,0.00081801385,0.0003771037,0.0004550577,0.0003767688,0.00036194202,0.0016386299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00169918,0.00025239744,0.00029700014,0.00041420636,0.00040951883,0.00047235753,0.0005266864,0.00036467297,0.00062928395],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013667032,0.00013193651,0.22414716,0.00020464469,0.00006493149,0.000065861175,0.00031958558,0.0008081922,0.74182045,0.00021437276,0.0001770875,0.03190919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026264075,0.0010524468,0.44897065,0.00008068462,0.00015953495,0.0004473031,0.0008855774,0.0068947366,0.5345419,0.0002728133,0.006616867,0.000051161303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002652994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011985552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002652994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047963107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040251532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00548172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213257118","doi":"10.1002/edn3.289","title":"Effects of temperature and oxygen on cyanobacterial DNA preservation in sediments: A comparison study of major taxa","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anoxic waters; Cyanobacteria; Biology; Sediment; Microcystis; Population; Ecology; Environmental chemistry; Botany; Environmental science; Chemistry; Paleontology; Bacteria","score_opus":0.0064698694916649375,"score_gpt":0.19781674862153512,"score_spread":0.19134687912987017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213257118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998835,0.00046301575,0.00021022718,0.0000056738722,0.000004142835,0.000007138088,0.00025450377,0.0000045105994,0.00021581067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845314,0.0003022881,0.0005134006,0.000012455519,0.000004963974,0.000012059082,0.00038666773,0.000007748034,0.0003072262],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997789,0.00003713139,0.000023066048,0.00007333347,0.000055043733,0.00003243971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995415,0.00007816676,0.00015859136,0.000026823383,0.00013181985,0.00006310488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028067594,0.00032301986,0.00031523217,0.00057650346,0.0002334065,0.00044249385,0.00014153682,0.00024049262,0.0004602256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004923011,0.00014845621,0.0003237249,0.00050018664,0.00022380633,0.00025566324,0.00024172459,0.00015337173,0.00015821504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001126635,0.00009124112,0.0848766,0.00015604967,0.000108903056,0.000063339656,0.00022801482,0.00025182657,0.9054111,0.000021004618,0.00002670192,0.0076385895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008458326,0.0013023437,0.8558739,0.000016504313,0.00013040575,0.00013648589,0.00038485476,0.0007470775,0.14065091,0.000030820738,0.0007005689,0.000017748622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016708489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019867718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016708489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001931325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001508764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0033222437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220882444","doi":"10.1002/edn3.291","title":"Developmental microbiome of the small carpenter bee, <i>Ceratina calcarata</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Microbiome; Zoology; Larva; Pollen; Pupa; Ecology; Brood; Taxon; Honey bee; Botany","score_opus":0.017771312336683286,"score_gpt":0.14318399447806096,"score_spread":0.12541268214137768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220882444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991467,0.00009422139,0.000056316967,0.00000930653,0.0000010615227,0.0000082808965,0.0002464276,0.000003400973,0.00043425456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775416,0.00008199305,0.0004828929,0.000028098959,0.0000012732376,0.000024228548,0.0006032274,0.0000054848683,0.0010185718],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99994147,0.0000039260026,0.000004032627,0.000027173355,0.000012632434,0.000010792622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998642,0.000017408998,0.00004648283,0.000009056683,0.00003252119,0.000030325662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000089219066,0.00018135255,0.00018259471,0.0006221291,0.00067132356,0.00054196385,0.00018904658,0.00024707522,0.0009596097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015122596,0.00011605272,0.00017358817,0.00037884025,0.00029557024,0.00025422522,0.00043960544,0.00026184958,0.00016305964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038082505,0.000039627324,0.08382018,0.000111034926,0.000024445138,0.00026552327,0.0006309467,0.00009453882,0.90605503,0.000052071853,0.00009318716,0.0084326165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003753131,0.00014030529,0.98548084,0.000011677492,0.000014213072,0.00018143488,0.000636901,0.00012339873,0.01232244,0.000015058366,0.0010625524,0.000007491863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076406836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019626852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076406836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033610163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032895664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015192449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224255589","doi":"10.1002/edn3.300","title":"Urban environments harbor greater oomycete and <i>Phytophthora</i> diversity, creating a bridgehead for potential new pathogens to natural ecosystems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant Pathogens and Resistance","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Natural Resources Canada; FPInnovations; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; University of British Columbia","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Oomycete; Phytophthora ramorum; Ecosystem; Ecology; Biological dispersal; Biodiversity; Biology; Phytophthora; Natural (archaeology); Biota; Disturbance (geology); Urban ecology; Geography; Habitat; Population; Pathogen; Botany","score_opus":0.00868372837859368,"score_gpt":0.16543902121106363,"score_spread":0.15675529283246994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224255589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983829,0.000090181995,0.00035543594,0.000015014531,0.0000018520033,0.0000065859836,0.00030609535,0.00001175877,0.00083015754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832994,0.00006803954,0.00075662276,0.000020852955,0.0000029996384,0.000008940793,0.00034121404,0.000005452871,0.00046596176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998004,0.000033106528,0.000014776405,0.00006936439,0.000032899425,0.000049490063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967325,0.000047624442,0.00015097464,0.000021328826,0.000048011698,0.000058774473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011009597,0.00018946578,0.00021951739,0.0009362266,0.0006748343,0.0009419544,0.00012634465,0.00019067894,0.0029518774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023635001,0.00013660282,0.00014326301,0.000908047,0.00035578897,0.0002983857,0.00070858275,0.00022274721,0.00030311238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034898036,0.0001388716,0.79187065,0.00022325288,0.000067197616,0.00048681872,0.0014967242,0.00023439826,0.18882689,0.0004002692,0.00027623423,0.015629733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042376255,0.00006888905,0.9882086,0.000020646503,0.000017629583,0.0004251097,0.0021537554,0.00018364457,0.006790309,0.00016855034,0.0019497272,0.000008853204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021761628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061126626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029518774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018543779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002270096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009875059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248338973","doi":"10.1002/edn3.v3.1","title":"Environmental DNA captures the genetic diversity of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) in West Greenland","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Naval Research","keywords":"Bay; Geography; Arctic; Fishery; Inlet; Environmental DNA; Oceanography; Archaeology; Ecology; Geology; Biology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.01028060446111369,"score_gpt":0.19133016389759258,"score_spread":0.18104955943647888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248338973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985668,0.000047062815,0.000092524046,0.000022485465,0.0000017743694,0.000012453599,0.00062519545,0.0000068333347,0.0006249454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99632853,0.000103128485,0.0005516587,0.00009163283,0.0000023326738,0.00003950268,0.0012210826,0.0000057963516,0.0016562233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989736,0.000010959316,0.000006708803,0.00003861548,0.000022060594,0.000024325554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998703,0.000012147372,0.00002965758,0.000009029055,0.00003365096,0.00004525002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001267136,0.00015890312,0.000103358165,0.0009479062,0.00046131446,0.00020376727,0.00022204214,0.00017509777,0.0012988651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020219921,0.00011986699,0.00007858089,0.00090940035,0.00030414842,0.0002260129,0.00050241454,0.00011091853,0.00028108942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007185955,0.00003657093,0.9572795,0.000027322036,0.000027157335,0.00032025584,0.0035788778,0.00008389879,0.01986591,0.00005239763,0.0007976636,0.01785853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.570088e-7,0.000013134241,0.99849236,0.000003827666,0.000002883884,0.000035092078,0.0008974525,0.000016881531,0.00017861859,0.0000064719907,0.00035137206,9.27294e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.113734536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4614354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113734536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068797707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039646652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22614509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280524935","doi":"10.1002/edn3.310","title":"Sedimentary <scp>DNA</scp> of a human‐impacted lake in Western Canada (Cultus Lake) reveals changes in micro‐eukaryotic diversity over the past ~200 years","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Diatom; Biology; Sedimentary rock; Biodiversity; Ecology; Intracellular; Extracellular; Paleontology; Cell biology","score_opus":0.008996557685644904,"score_gpt":0.1819442512093105,"score_spread":0.17294769352366557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280524935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974425,0.00018588296,0.00009470894,0.00005236723,0.0000031468019,0.0000064083674,0.0014210374,0.000014434594,0.0007795573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760544,0.00013347511,0.0002231809,0.000049749353,0.0000029838882,0.0000057000857,0.0010356614,0.000005568192,0.00093827187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983406,0.0000055239057,0.000006790666,0.000037179932,0.000060308423,0.000056077308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999542,0.000015137266,0.000073856456,0.000010848159,0.0002638223,0.00009440801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012055544,0.00022814074,0.00020771903,0.0011605201,0.0018371536,0.00090132613,0.0003113416,0.00025909574,0.0011418936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032769522,0.00014313437,0.00014099113,0.002127862,0.0005813094,0.00018813579,0.0005307594,0.00024139247,0.00020181343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009700496,0.000016626496,0.9679382,0.00006962248,0.00006273865,0.0002112647,0.0012629632,0.00020921383,0.019249668,0.000065443004,0.0008577038,0.009959725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.91237e-7,0.000006115818,0.9981888,0.0000062433865,0.000009575699,0.000029901452,0.0005517673,0.00015320722,0.00041611664,0.0000061387714,0.00062800647,0.000003213198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92623824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96992594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07376176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048987763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004098757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14839226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281640466","doi":"10.1002/edn3.315","title":"Evaluation of lake sedimentary ancient <scp>DNA</scp> metabarcoding to assess fungal biodiversity in Arctic paleoecosystems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Academy of Finland; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Norges Forskningsråd; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Vetenskapsrådet; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Biology; Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Amplicon; Ancient DNA; Ecology; Mycobiota; Taxon; Polymerase chain reaction","score_opus":0.03738097883471758,"score_gpt":0.23055816211926305,"score_spread":0.19317718328454547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281640466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934035,0.00031923153,0.0048871567,0.000016119999,0.0000053950757,0.000016743294,0.00091777457,0.000062768464,0.0003713042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793275,0.00016349783,0.01863932,0.0000314367,0.000005848396,0.000027646493,0.0014636659,0.000031604493,0.00030947593],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993869,0.00012712764,0.000064911685,0.0002102892,0.00014612277,0.00006453424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988159,0.0002342033,0.00035413323,0.00008295095,0.0004295007,0.00008335721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015339603,0.0004129075,0.00033128937,0.0015195712,0.00064063986,0.0008487429,0.00026402733,0.00037338553,0.00053429016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014815306,0.00022446431,0.00035660516,0.0013378896,0.0002871036,0.00031796712,0.0004320127,0.00023431491,0.00018589632],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056562026,0.00006220422,0.43680465,0.0003466731,0.00031636673,0.0002360271,0.00089364435,0.0033625972,0.524077,0.00020180459,0.00016410682,0.032969218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009454836,0.00015168113,0.90091056,0.000042234406,0.0001945855,0.00030571112,0.00032382272,0.015441,0.080750875,0.00009757044,0.0017463604,0.00002607446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00800042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01479385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00800042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042603136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051664247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015907705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283589851","doi":"10.1002/edn3.332","title":"Testing the effectiveness of environmental <scp>DNA</scp> (<scp>eDNA</scp>) to quantify larval amphibian abundance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Laurentian University; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Mesocosm; Tadpole (physics); Biology; Amphibian; Abundance (ecology); Leopard frog; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Environmental DNA; Abiotic component; Ecosystem; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.014461767399558713,"score_gpt":0.2048997539819414,"score_spread":0.1904379865823827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283589851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949143,0.00014159568,0.0035638574,0.000047044574,0.000008954499,0.000051749084,0.0003521922,0.000070974645,0.0008494197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991996,0.00005879999,0.007031416,0.00011209836,0.000004712141,0.00008530003,0.00022479564,0.000012605631,0.00047418108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987902,0.000448388,0.00007629791,0.0003851865,0.00024101883,0.00005890288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675494,0.0013591611,0.0008534562,0.00024486528,0.00049490796,0.0002926503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018221992,0.00030689398,0.00019786398,0.0004822589,0.000205847,0.00049166445,0.00047881546,0.0005286716,0.0009090945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023928848,0.00021777998,0.00022067159,0.0002739394,0.00043275562,0.00056278904,0.00028530703,0.00037570353,0.00026147036],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010943653,0.00096987473,0.48472366,0.000107227555,0.00020731665,0.00004677791,0.00012198367,0.0019048428,0.48376125,0.000084105544,0.00016670242,0.02681194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027516535,0.004747834,0.7974569,0.00002864125,0.00011093891,0.00013693799,0.00015391095,0.013397033,0.18301454,0.00007616603,0.0008225716,0.000026969628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024477516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047519985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024477516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034618593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016790854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009636819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287958791","doi":"10.1002/edn3.335","title":"Comparative analysis of zooplankton diversity in freshwaters: What can we gain from metagenomic analysis?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; Concordia University; McGill University; Bureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Groupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologie; Concordia University; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Université du Québec à Montréal; Canada Research Chairs; McGill University","keywords":"Metagenomics; Biology; Biodiversity; Zooplankton; Environmental DNA; Genetic diversity; Ecology; Computational biology; Archaea; Community structure; Evolutionary biology; Gene; Genetics","score_opus":0.02270313338928139,"score_gpt":0.21578513559491566,"score_spread":0.19308200220563426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287958791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94253904,0.03956416,0.011632577,0.0033476427,0.00007646784,0.000049967806,0.0010882798,0.000084362386,0.0016173931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98064387,0.008729025,0.009255475,0.0005155783,0.0001323689,0.00002220506,0.0005125473,0.000013365253,0.00017574018],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989968,0.00037844968,0.00008615766,0.00020467059,0.00022649483,0.00010743324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750584,0.00089346233,0.00041894248,0.00019408225,0.0006940391,0.00029367462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036692515,0.0008012165,0.0012804472,0.0035315729,0.0005630589,0.0021419413,0.0006597998,0.00082197384,0.0005540219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046156235,0.0003176729,0.0008097563,0.0024736666,0.0009659073,0.0022259895,0.0012739064,0.00061199965,0.00014714456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046017813,0.00009994174,0.7698634,0.0018332704,0.0018454943,0.00050242,0.0017529879,0.0014606004,0.08533303,0.00062133383,0.00062374544,0.13560367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013866451,0.00027601214,0.9804421,0.00058975373,0.00053682073,0.00037130693,0.0033293166,0.0030396467,0.004373661,0.003479577,0.0034882852,0.000059663922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062456317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011971194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062456317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074262323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089973316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019405067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289518707","doi":"10.1002/edn3.341","title":"Relationship between brook charr (<i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i>) <scp>eDNA</scp> concentration and angling data in structured wildlife areas","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Salvelinus; Fontinalis; Fishing; Wildlife; Context (archaeology); Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Population; Biology; Ecology; Geography; Trout; Demography","score_opus":0.024856225310365108,"score_gpt":0.22185697094069468,"score_spread":0.19700074563032957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289518707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994802,0.000021818005,0.000095347044,0.000007539741,4.1433313e-7,0.000001372738,0.00019681314,0.000002745019,0.00019387735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936587,0.000010125291,0.00012304874,0.000004628045,4.823095e-7,0.0000016416382,0.0003199831,0.0000011578028,0.00017305836],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979144,0.000048514496,0.000016167065,0.000066715766,0.00004620667,0.00003086417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978377,0.0008485615,0.0005113575,0.00008872446,0.0004705041,0.00024322457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054365955,0.000111522204,0.00011808079,0.0005512289,0.00038067158,0.00043481303,0.00016926012,0.0001489157,0.0010649281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018345959,0.00008122098,0.00009239311,0.0005402062,0.00022096738,0.00018715442,0.00020513125,0.00015649125,0.00010081086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037666723,0.0000062904746,0.99806005,0.0000035788896,0.000022030392,0.000020776302,0.00005817574,0.0003110571,0.00065734924,0.000011858512,0.000034738227,0.00077631854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012629282,0.000020155636,0.99821776,0.0000019905083,0.0000056563713,0.000025219717,0.00017902389,0.0011629976,0.00023703201,0.000011754078,0.00013491053,0.0000022925055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20755595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42658743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20755595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010851729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000398413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4126957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289981979","doi":"10.1002/edn3.347","title":"Environmental DNA tracks zooplankton population dynamics in experimental mesocosms","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada First Research Excellence Fund","keywords":"Mesocosm; Abiotic component; Zooplankton; Daphnia magna; Ecology; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Environmental DNA; Population; Plankton; Biomass (ecology); Environmental science; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Chemistry","score_opus":0.006869418736033426,"score_gpt":0.1937957928071887,"score_spread":0.18692637407115528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289981979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99891615,0.000040148407,0.00054384023,0.0000115084595,0.0000047957565,0.00002209484,0.00031319523,0.000009038514,0.00013928047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963702,0.000071608796,0.0022671223,0.000046334622,0.000004743439,0.000109364104,0.0006086846,0.000005379318,0.00051658595],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997193,0.000031746884,0.000016238955,0.0001618306,0.00005359558,0.000017207542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947757,0.000104259474,0.00015894459,0.000066754066,0.00008991913,0.00010259268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003554471,0.00022982992,0.00030902494,0.0002331454,0.00033313868,0.00034496153,0.00029021312,0.00023078227,0.0007307279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004670486,0.00018898962,0.00021400055,0.00021910523,0.00029842043,0.0003529601,0.00042881956,0.00048135003,0.0001342864],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012888856,0.0005002101,0.44697165,0.00006492492,0.00013807193,0.000063088184,0.00020875157,0.0019990609,0.5406491,0.00010343162,0.0001640832,0.007848757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007567175,0.0013127194,0.9290006,0.000010454056,0.000079546386,0.00003775217,0.00025113265,0.010677511,0.057452574,0.00015454301,0.0009293806,0.000018047182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004319068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012915281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004319068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006882616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003227271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008587837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294884043","doi":"10.1002/edn3.353","title":"Metatranscriptomics reveals a shift in microbial community composition and function during summer months in a coastal marine environment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada; Tula Foundation; University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Research and Development; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Abiotic component; Ecology; Biology; Microbial population biology; Upwelling; Plankton; Temperate climate; Oceanography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.00886076468811677,"score_gpt":0.18917348199969405,"score_spread":0.18031271731157728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294884043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99892956,0.000055444285,0.00011057615,0.00000914811,0.0000015059694,0.0000058092337,0.0007383577,0.000005054848,0.00014450237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734443,0.000109137574,0.0005630195,0.000027902912,0.0000022799302,0.0000152444845,0.001408783,0.0000044270705,0.000524837],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989736,0.000005883249,0.000006013336,0.000038628812,0.00002280933,0.000029350951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99986005,0.000011997076,0.00003764982,0.000008383844,0.000049971946,0.000031986863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010592204,0.00027724958,0.00026889093,0.0005480808,0.00033619473,0.00039175354,0.00013227487,0.00026253128,0.0003655778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017548352,0.00016509378,0.00020761095,0.0005626123,0.0001406506,0.00015671465,0.00024535475,0.0001896626,0.00011891343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002946007,0.000034533627,0.16493475,0.00004284214,0.000032084772,0.00009847356,0.0003906562,0.00016789605,0.82929474,0.000017838987,0.00009087084,0.0046007205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014732627,0.000069602764,0.99264765,0.0000031281345,0.000012788234,0.000050408562,0.00033876064,0.00028078043,0.006387858,0.000009614075,0.0001939299,0.000003932738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035308532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0848738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035308532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004386904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003847642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070206046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296613398","doi":"10.1002/edn3.348","title":"Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> reveals anadromous river herring habitat use and recolonization after restoration of aquatic connectivity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science; Maryland Sea Grant, University of Maryland; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"Fish migration; Alewife; Alosa; Tributary; Fishery; Habitat; Nursery habitat; Ecology; Herring; Restoration ecology; Watershed; Environmental science; Biology; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.010111549576964434,"score_gpt":0.1798342674677082,"score_spread":0.16972271789074375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296613398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99976593,0.0000136916,0.0000334703,0.0000037158804,4.0835468e-7,0.0000011260313,0.00006855501,0.000001475851,0.00011167625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995999,0.000011723782,0.000110042405,0.000009766093,8.2077844e-7,0.000002304234,0.00012259188,5.446787e-7,0.00014237083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998603,0.000025889804,0.00000986817,0.000041587657,0.000030320656,0.000032042404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950993,0.00005970383,0.00024508443,0.000017470844,0.00007934555,0.000088464716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018720512,0.00010771831,0.00010008376,0.00058485166,0.00022581473,0.0002706649,0.00012447816,0.00015308842,0.0008407335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046677463,0.000060044324,0.00008251313,0.00045146985,0.00021509414,0.00009998942,0.00013484007,0.00016194308,0.000116269606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006197875,0.000021360169,0.98455274,0.00000680768,0.000020022913,0.000095250805,0.00015936942,0.000059379254,0.012845316,0.000011206865,0.000048578415,0.002117891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.8510324e-7,0.000031500203,0.9992242,9.377257e-7,0.0000027683207,0.000048644164,0.00013828694,0.000066421,0.00043722193,0.000002783288,0.000046120815,5.7127085e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019013818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04229898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019013818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024709548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014714777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037806273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298142635","doi":"10.1002/edn3.359","title":"Development and validation of targeted environmental <scp>DNA</scp> (<scp>eDNA</scp>) metabarcoding for early detection of 69 invasive fishes and aquatic invertebrates","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biology; Primer (cosmetics); Invertebrate; Polymerase chain reaction; Invasive species; DNA sequencing; Ecology; DNA; Zoology; Biodiversity; Genetics; Gene; Chemistry","score_opus":0.012644675871859608,"score_gpt":0.18015652550212322,"score_spread":0.1675118496302636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298142635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7220188,0.0013833478,0.26658076,0.00031366202,0.00010501423,0.001618298,0.003354623,0.0015452972,0.003080203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3972691,0.00082172867,0.5928093,0.0004234918,0.00002541159,0.0009961487,0.005021549,0.00024952606,0.0023836922],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632484,0.00064635486,0.00030550573,0.0012379027,0.0013029958,0.00018231953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777645,0.0004882064,0.00048921304,0.0001713715,0.00092159474,0.0001531229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030517871,0.0009602655,0.0005878581,0.0012114829,0.00043081783,0.00084823114,0.00094150304,0.0012008996,0.0006865106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038966434,0.0007358828,0.0008898846,0.00061456655,0.00079813646,0.0006261513,0.0011826977,0.00077942776,0.000734992],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007168605,0.00005810365,0.005492848,0.00025846722,0.00004904516,0.00007939495,0.00016245499,0.00090369827,0.9788126,0.0001993706,0.00012156032,0.013790797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021291446,0.00082297635,0.015175315,0.00007196115,0.00015059422,0.0005215231,0.00013956727,0.009908527,0.96799624,0.00012865376,0.005014274,0.00004907109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017503035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045132516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030517871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041214263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012232915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016139567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312199489","doi":"10.1002/edn3.384","title":"Development and field validation of <scp>RPA‐CRISPR‐Cas</scp> environmental <scp>DNA</scp> assays for the detection of brown trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i>) and Arctic char (<i>Salvelinus alpinus</i>)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Marine Institute","keywords":"Salmo; Recombinase Polymerase Amplification; Brown trout; Arctic char; Salvelinus; Loop-mediated isothermal amplification; Nucleic acid; DNA; Salmonidae; Biology; Trout; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Genetics","score_opus":0.010423535197576625,"score_gpt":0.19394860083237103,"score_spread":0.1835250656347944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312199489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8589603,0.0003164339,0.125483,0.0004624602,0.00012742044,0.0033511303,0.0030389377,0.0012756392,0.0069845887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7871732,0.00033510575,0.19730707,0.00029594067,0.000021499005,0.0022856402,0.0045942953,0.00021584603,0.00777145],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644727,0.0006095261,0.00017507981,0.00084579224,0.0015913661,0.0003309519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980888,0.00022122625,0.000269686,0.000252865,0.0009599582,0.00020748102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004166492,0.00054152927,0.0003725665,0.00050345506,0.00087955507,0.0009741826,0.0010016097,0.0012208668,0.0010841794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015174398,0.00031190788,0.0005767255,0.0004072694,0.00097254117,0.00035830186,0.00068336166,0.00087660755,0.00065171684],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112196816,0.000372374,0.0060772127,0.00013426204,0.000030519335,0.000100694364,0.00023288817,0.0017005128,0.97905284,0.00033074667,0.0006314536,0.011224386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042531192,0.0030591304,0.026026959,0.000048336206,0.00006205763,0.00030327385,0.00028370073,0.0063440865,0.95046085,0.00017368975,0.013147898,0.00004745426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012439065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022413878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012439065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013821246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001999181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024733365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313378893","doi":"10.1002/edn3.381","title":"Interspecific allometric scaling in <scp>eDNA</scp> production among northwestern Atlantic bony fishes reflects physiological allometric scaling","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Allometry; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Interspecific competition; Intraspecific competition; Ecology; Biomass (ecology); Organism; Range (aeronautics); Zoology","score_opus":0.01781376872981531,"score_gpt":0.202905622649142,"score_spread":0.1850918539193267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313378893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99825984,0.00004770251,0.0009185819,0.000018634148,0.0000020072607,0.0000035073685,0.00009463381,0.000019506604,0.00063557294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995203,0.000008464953,0.00028014916,0.000011640909,0.0000020437865,0.0000036394395,0.00010040754,0.000004858256,0.00006847486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959546,0.00007837208,0.00002732254,0.00018664356,0.00008190125,0.000030334228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835277,0.0004938884,0.00051323365,0.00026323713,0.00029044366,0.00008655575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009782182,0.00017414503,0.00020847918,0.0009475409,0.00033351145,0.00051265967,0.00027258386,0.00021323413,0.00169562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020268152,0.00017022896,0.00022849164,0.00052813924,0.0007297759,0.00038292803,0.00044836733,0.00034138223,0.0002288708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007270531,0.000017107403,0.95890254,0.000019981459,0.000121499696,0.000034537574,0.00036709404,0.00053372607,0.032726742,0.00019420226,0.00010329745,0.0069065965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.781411e-7,0.000011090337,0.9986933,0.0000014282401,0.000004288946,0.000022986636,0.000046286394,0.0008316857,0.00024146291,0.00007735591,0.00006626806,0.0000028715476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063551096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009178439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063551096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000358979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019675982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012636244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315796344","doi":"10.1002/edn3.385","title":"Airborne eDNA documents a diverse and ecologically complex tropical bat and other mammal community","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Edwards Lifesciences","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Sampling (signal processing); Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Citizen science; Environmental science; Biology; Filter (signal processing)","score_opus":0.028591642187279553,"score_gpt":0.22891504159378087,"score_spread":0.20032339940650132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315796344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966349,0.00013174323,0.001344504,0.000018202174,0.000003923977,0.000016695989,0.00027553207,0.000015840873,0.0015586764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99494016,0.00009308781,0.0038102975,0.000046882946,0.000007769974,0.000016225506,0.0002816402,0.000008571926,0.0007953461],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998043,0.000028385817,0.000015357107,0.000075615564,0.000040927294,0.00003545173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996809,0.0000832397,0.00010233913,0.000024371042,0.00006115286,0.000048022688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022542365,0.00017325167,0.00010391672,0.00085783814,0.0004045798,0.00053515506,0.00018787103,0.00021304697,0.0019947183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032491842,0.00009556853,0.000098851764,0.00043516347,0.00038408698,0.0002747319,0.00040256465,0.00016497371,0.00034030588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001758017,0.000069992304,0.48024657,0.0001365716,0.0000643424,0.0006673765,0.0020412365,0.00025398764,0.49206218,0.00019836712,0.00017573072,0.02390787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039311335,0.00025473503,0.97212154,0.00003651478,0.00003883921,0.0017762023,0.0024419627,0.0008173636,0.01996127,0.00009699784,0.0024405706,0.000010110328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033127656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009114034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033127656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016353173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108539665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006673038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317534803","doi":"10.1002/edn3.388","title":"Answers blowing in the wind: Detection of birds, mammals, and amphibians with airborne environmental <scp>DNA</scp> in a natural environment over a yearlong survey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Genome Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada; Texas Tech University","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biological dispersal; Vertebrate; Natural (archaeology); Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.007898787262493262,"score_gpt":0.18161416888913412,"score_spread":0.17371538162664085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317534803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993686,0.000028771903,0.0002622275,0.00000745896,9.705267e-7,0.000006607655,0.000116169256,0.0000026805203,0.00020661157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99825746,0.000031662574,0.0011436658,0.000030079298,0.000002765286,0.000010574002,0.00026047815,0.0000018465013,0.0002615156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999706,0.0000668855,0.0000126018585,0.00011552878,0.00006465311,0.000034186512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994246,0.000085252614,0.00019172346,0.000032662392,0.00015784963,0.00010800708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044089113,0.00013609277,0.00013187651,0.000649971,0.0003892595,0.00031791558,0.0003030696,0.00031419704,0.00065284764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000588184,0.00014278623,0.00009575416,0.00036788103,0.00035706817,0.00025395196,0.00032440986,0.00022715294,0.00017658611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026841803,0.00003078514,0.977216,0.000010587964,0.000021168185,0.00005359365,0.00027477668,0.000043015807,0.01896869,0.000009721475,0.000046557685,0.0032981744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.753311e-7,0.00007619043,0.9987804,0.000002650582,0.00000503053,0.00009863903,0.00031467227,0.00008777062,0.0004802471,0.00000499401,0.00014760059,0.000001149305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006684101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020351876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006684101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015389647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011643837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013290405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319832609","doi":"10.1002/edn3.392","title":"Optimized <scp>DNA</scp> isolation from marine sponges for natural sampler <scp>DNA</scp> metabarcoding","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo; Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Sponge; Environmental DNA; DNA extraction; DNA; Biology; Homogenization (climate); Biodiversity; Ecology; Polymerase chain reaction; Botany; Biochemistry; Gene","score_opus":0.01734538957809457,"score_gpt":0.21614593564763615,"score_spread":0.1988005460695416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319832609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5333772,0.0018128975,0.42497948,0.0011413604,0.00036635893,0.0034298918,0.016921185,0.007891998,0.010079724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35619015,0.0015049928,0.61279464,0.00093593623,0.000087891596,0.0030436274,0.018436776,0.0018030849,0.0052029495],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.997603,0.00052824296,0.00029287642,0.00054035644,0.00079240673,0.00024311911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972149,0.00082135067,0.00040174113,0.0002862281,0.001108852,0.00016688311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028844692,0.0010517711,0.00078910915,0.0012415408,0.0007733937,0.001197636,0.0008815583,0.00091008603,0.0032710293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047205775,0.000563822,0.0008173255,0.0009312335,0.00074056385,0.0006348284,0.0010081773,0.0010468997,0.0032511358],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018015772,0.000066285174,0.0020977906,0.00052763097,0.000034636858,0.00021507347,0.00017053721,0.00087323756,0.9823559,0.00019018761,0.00095801253,0.012330494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003251708,0.00045704786,0.010714895,0.00012781608,0.00007461784,0.00038984363,0.00016944042,0.0054497947,0.9681626,0.0002611081,0.014077239,0.00008295091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017481536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005542837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032710293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036952674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014264793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015254676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366590770","doi":"10.1002/edn3.423","title":"Paired environmental <scp>DNA</scp> and dive surveys provide distinct but complementary snapshots of marine biodiversity in a temperate fjord","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Tula Foundation","funders":"Hakai Institute; Tula Foundation","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Fjord; Benthic zone; Biodiversity; Invertebrate; Marine invertebrates; Ecology; Biology; Marine ecosystem; Fishery; Habitat; Ecosystem; Oceanography; Geology","score_opus":0.01678042907038937,"score_gpt":0.19421916177991655,"score_spread":0.17743873270952717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366590770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977043,0.00008843342,0.00037214768,0.0000098559485,0.0000041739872,0.000013952744,0.0007671924,0.000011432359,0.001028499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966912,0.000054530163,0.0012594899,0.00006211886,0.000004213449,0.000022318902,0.0011467364,0.0000053816257,0.0007540122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932086,0.00006328856,0.00004741088,0.00021229692,0.00015221348,0.00020391117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910444,0.00006414813,0.00020122132,0.00005381068,0.00038573326,0.0001906472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004237803,0.0003066904,0.00037608753,0.0012393113,0.0015046735,0.001012196,0.00039876427,0.00035572608,0.0013258815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067223393,0.00026483586,0.00014371163,0.0012890404,0.0005728869,0.0002740899,0.0010144057,0.00021531536,0.0004250896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001069695,0.000029391096,0.9731284,0.00002890851,0.000043889773,0.0001330734,0.00053455285,0.00012374303,0.018996272,0.000019834959,0.00017641723,0.0066784862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013972395,0.000022900678,0.9988624,0.0000055158175,0.0000057540606,0.000026662718,0.00036714962,0.00006054974,0.0003613424,0.0000054019456,0.00027861088,0.0000022753725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30682278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6816407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30682278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001383244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011110822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61007375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376275248","doi":"10.1002/edn3.424","title":"Including environmental covariates clarifies the relationship between endangered Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) abundance and environmental <scp>DNA</scp>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; New Brunswick Innovation Foundation; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Salmo; Environmental DNA; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Habitat; Fishery; Biology; Relative species abundance; Endangered species; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.029695007839225938,"score_gpt":0.22650200350393157,"score_spread":0.19680699566470564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376275248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99511576,0.0003406303,0.0023928839,0.00047832695,0.000036644513,0.0000117038035,0.00082759437,0.000068562294,0.0007278585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979692,0.000039901344,0.0010349232,0.00011984197,0.000020421852,0.0000072547205,0.0004457632,0.000016139691,0.00034655572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983997,0.00072146504,0.00011834281,0.00048590958,0.000119691904,0.00015496789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928825,0.004140359,0.0014178863,0.0006253087,0.000406779,0.0005272341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028158594,0.00052983186,0.00044442655,0.0005637516,0.0005084627,0.0011547876,0.0006908212,0.00063353166,0.0024132254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051278775,0.0003006857,0.0011162753,0.0007809916,0.0005667093,0.0008665687,0.0007341086,0.00083352893,0.00028056733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119059856,0.000031726788,0.995181,0.00001578252,0.00037469328,0.00005221154,0.00003467054,0.000877196,0.00090411166,0.000087496686,0.00025735353,0.0020646413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064309324,0.0001268798,0.98831254,0.000018044015,0.00022655037,0.00006314741,0.0001618363,0.009595501,0.00035071274,0.00014235172,0.0009834308,0.000012545656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044130925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09464975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044130925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006665626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010905374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08774811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378086011","doi":"10.1002/edn3.422","title":"Using <scp>qPCR</scp> of environmental <scp>DNA</scp> (<scp>eDNA</scp>) to estimate the biomass of juvenile Pacific salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus</i> spp.)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tula Foundation; University of British Columbia","funders":"Hakai Institute; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs; Tula Foundation","keywords":"Mesocosm; Environmental DNA; Biomass (ecology); Juvenile; Biology; Fishery; Chinook wind; Hatchery; Oncorhynchus; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.016848465013387205,"score_gpt":0.23818079369718995,"score_spread":0.22133232868380273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378086011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787997,0.00015384557,0.018188342,0.00004538204,0.000020843183,0.00007694212,0.0013855407,0.00011498811,0.0012143961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97434855,0.0001342475,0.02240357,0.00018733133,0.000010492027,0.00018167878,0.0013471177,0.000036895184,0.0013503057],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999469,0.00006769397,0.0000351834,0.00022464684,0.00016823619,0.000035341553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935406,0.00014732115,0.000223221,0.000048233458,0.00017607583,0.00005104132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004727627,0.00039951573,0.0001550387,0.00041341558,0.0002341231,0.00041395388,0.00024381586,0.00030517578,0.00087341503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050560327,0.00020645732,0.00022101859,0.00030782903,0.0005096272,0.000272056,0.00031524058,0.00041804044,0.0003004648],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013386602,0.00006978132,0.05668374,0.000058103145,0.000048384627,0.000023691076,0.00005695413,0.00058530306,0.9327477,0.000048412,0.00011721175,0.009426797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013426721,0.0007679848,0.38381818,0.000029150206,0.00009462617,0.000089151916,0.00021451022,0.00923516,0.60407037,0.00010851251,0.0015282949,0.000030734245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039231963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010773428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039231963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003295056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029965834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007800758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378229030","doi":"10.1002/edn3.432","title":"Toward a national <scp>eDNA</scp> strategy for the United States","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Scale (ratio); Environmental DNA; Resource management (computing); Environmental planning; Natural resource; Business; Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.04018921604400201,"score_gpt":0.23937832685878777,"score_spread":0.19918911081478574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378229030","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0095299445,0.00871692,0.051742725,0.8102416,0.007908317,0.0015805535,0.004109922,0.002654591,0.103515394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05359278,0.009177215,0.32477173,0.51724786,0.001740099,0.0037534807,0.0078146,0.00063456985,0.08126773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823539,0.004546169,0.0012980747,0.0013801486,0.008109526,0.0023120842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9468938,0.008852569,0.0030756707,0.0022296133,0.02560313,0.013345219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051537327,0.001959661,0.0010814469,0.004676062,0.00484724,0.009304209,0.007715774,0.017887926,0.014488639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028575221,0.0010892334,0.0020271267,0.0028500506,0.0033374573,0.0072222394,0.013717867,0.009016793,0.0042583076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013542664,0.0010046357,0.005915368,0.0010941614,0.0000980419,0.0009490796,0.0009721164,0.0034120742,0.005055575,0.13013056,0.69351214,0.15772076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056482742,0.0002831991,0.0048618945,0.0020623687,0.00007038306,0.00028967342,0.0018533345,0.002097379,0.0021885403,0.023835491,0.9623061,0.00009517824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07879438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06417383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07879438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008959861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13371213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27255863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379743578","doi":"10.1002/edn3.437","title":"Assessing the degradation of environmental <scp>DNA</scp> and <scp>RNA</scp> based on genomic origin in a metabarcoding context","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biology; Barcode; Context (archaeology); Biodiversity; Molecular marker; DNA barcoding; Taxon; Ecology; Computational biology; Evolutionary biology; Microcosm; Genetics; Gene; Computer science","score_opus":0.02379390955380293,"score_gpt":0.23382366900543675,"score_spread":0.21002975945163382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379743578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92195857,0.0009915758,0.072583064,0.00013002107,0.000036210888,0.000094808085,0.0018321201,0.000299266,0.002074339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8727457,0.00085613976,0.1212863,0.00021408519,0.00002617495,0.00015482823,0.0022773866,0.00016494808,0.0022743708],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899894,0.0001663951,0.00008886279,0.00037746644,0.0002968521,0.000071439965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826485,0.00039872364,0.00061383087,0.00015559747,0.0004882395,0.00007874685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009158672,0.00046042725,0.0002827885,0.0009049045,0.00040291555,0.0009764824,0.00032427566,0.00044557443,0.00076411536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018410559,0.00026010358,0.00028957773,0.0007207511,0.0004909276,0.00061434373,0.0004719644,0.0005381146,0.0005143919],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007848743,0.000018462655,0.019983144,0.00010015333,0.00003920292,0.00004449124,0.00013165797,0.00025483896,0.97139376,0.00012135161,0.000048137805,0.0077862414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043570158,0.0002745523,0.16151348,0.000047740075,0.000107358646,0.00036462015,0.00026853627,0.006676997,0.8269494,0.00022517388,0.003540883,0.000026947204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001490845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038822868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001490845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031595485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042207292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0048436522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380081328","doi":"10.1002/edn3.438","title":"Enabling robust environmental DNA assay design with “unikseq” for the identification of taxon‐specific regions within whole mitochondrial genomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre; University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Biology; Environmental DNA; Mitochondrial DNA; DNA barcoding; Computational biology; Evolutionary biology; Genome; Genetics; Gene; Ecology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.03341825578848926,"score_gpt":0.20390276461879314,"score_spread":0.1704845088303039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380081328","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13454282,0.0004248991,0.8339971,0.00029241573,0.00018559511,0.00060218724,0.005675927,0.02227423,0.0020048583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25390947,0.00016927446,0.7346153,0.00054733315,0.00005198283,0.0013317267,0.0054251165,0.0016399551,0.002309724],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956059,0.0011175618,0.0004419265,0.0014953203,0.0010661714,0.00027310557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606663,0.0014815998,0.00065595284,0.00048428177,0.0010968341,0.00021474755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057860753,0.0010790748,0.00090607564,0.0009245071,0.00085005444,0.0017704059,0.001245355,0.00091656303,0.002794604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007998491,0.0010380618,0.0012899308,0.00069646793,0.0008976938,0.0014071078,0.0016624905,0.0015923339,0.0022546195],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001250905,0.00014715828,0.012466777,0.00092789566,0.00024664876,0.00031240817,0.00083372183,0.02067435,0.88645756,0.005281651,0.0046919696,0.06670901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004497815,0.00040382208,0.0076333093,0.00006965117,0.000084820815,0.00018983595,0.0001975311,0.12693265,0.83984923,0.0026833003,0.02173363,0.00017725682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018462666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036431558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057860753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012491642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015382239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030600071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382449738","doi":"10.1002/edn3.444","title":"How <scp>eDNA</scp> data filtration, sequence coverage, and primer selection influence assessment of fish communities in northern temperate lakes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Environmental DNA; Primer (cosmetics); Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Temperate climate; Biodiversity; Ecology; Sample (material); Range (aeronautics); Fishery; Geography; Chemistry","score_opus":0.02667286432502379,"score_gpt":0.24155192482123813,"score_spread":0.21487906049621436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382449738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9265166,0.0022500656,0.067503914,0.00023507587,0.000033477438,0.00039195348,0.0005559287,0.0003894145,0.0021236406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91638374,0.00052536756,0.08072138,0.00040096324,0.000013205169,0.0002901997,0.0006480517,0.00020508985,0.0008118682],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99204797,0.0043432126,0.00059165753,0.0012409926,0.0013729759,0.00040314038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915091,0.0057492703,0.00091853406,0.00032536068,0.001350982,0.00014673492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013538649,0.0007286574,0.00057113764,0.0010067242,0.00080929766,0.002093659,0.0004988496,0.0004681696,0.00070458895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018994512,0.00051837513,0.0004587244,0.00085858477,0.0009183891,0.000843879,0.0006655853,0.00032065515,0.0004085104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007790768,0.00013618956,0.4833281,0.0009579697,0.0007960183,0.00023995538,0.0017246926,0.006741483,0.4043043,0.00027406288,0.0009311883,0.09978686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045887595,0.0006765904,0.7199134,0.0002755322,0.00061874284,0.00047916314,0.0007469152,0.035944827,0.23242295,0.0004629017,0.008288515,0.0001245437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025612792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08272674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025612792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001112148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015785835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07160002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385369073","doi":"10.1002/edn3.459","title":"Beyond species detection<b>—</b>leveraging environmental DNA and environmental RNA to push beyond presence/absence applications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Ecology; Identification (biology); Biology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.009046726181211464,"score_gpt":0.19058289279261115,"score_spread":0.18153616661139968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385369073","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04509406,0.13368048,0.62607074,0.06897848,0.010961632,0.0005197817,0.0071501215,0.0062261485,0.10131859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3195361,0.06640307,0.5028301,0.06422582,0.005839946,0.00072682044,0.004812285,0.0027056546,0.032920245],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931573,0.0018193753,0.00036686432,0.0022645406,0.0020830317,0.0003088144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823416,0.009132151,0.0016198937,0.0026624375,0.003237846,0.0010061108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008777873,0.0015126813,0.0015791024,0.0024210738,0.0011955673,0.0070795184,0.002274774,0.004395647,0.011104673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012062026,0.00088182034,0.0012883579,0.0018822772,0.005745358,0.011480594,0.0048347916,0.0059238314,0.008489027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035534397,0.00014575043,0.015279861,0.007158577,0.00033724596,0.00055910065,0.0014471394,0.0012880358,0.25049478,0.059180103,0.034456585,0.6292974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031014963,0.000506216,0.013682222,0.0026643996,0.00029085405,0.0031464167,0.0015735661,0.005841539,0.14038613,0.1224048,0.70899516,0.0004776417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023767576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037246712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011104673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001640219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021749425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046422362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385417599","doi":"10.1002/edn3.455","title":"Differential ecological adaptation of diverse <i>Chaetoceros</i> species revealed by metabarcoding analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Chinese Academy of Sciences; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Chaetoceros; Biology; Ecology; Phytoplankton; Bay; Plankton; Adaptation (eye); Algal bloom; Marine ecosystem; Ecosystem; Oceanography; Nutrient","score_opus":0.019122142807248988,"score_gpt":0.21145743301699052,"score_spread":0.19233529020974152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385417599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956916,0.0004549832,0.0021212872,0.000037700025,0.000007668274,0.0000134983175,0.001010361,0.000022758317,0.00064012955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939107,0.0002232327,0.0038072278,0.0000595192,0.000007078593,0.000025544434,0.0014537948,0.000013216698,0.00049968355],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997106,0.000028416469,0.000029266657,0.00013443378,0.000051344796,0.000045811215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955267,0.00005054705,0.00018810961,0.00002767442,0.00012213555,0.00005879642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036244234,0.00030695426,0.00030457383,0.001690842,0.00044105883,0.00047915333,0.00023336313,0.00023391268,0.0005339129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006048495,0.00017273256,0.00031760265,0.0014120217,0.00025032467,0.000288357,0.0004630373,0.00020588408,0.00014583518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024366558,0.00003004136,0.53272676,0.0002500258,0.00015634413,0.00024118015,0.0009534658,0.00029681186,0.441075,0.00022391252,0.00023973192,0.023563037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004480194,0.0000487503,0.9866427,0.000018237653,0.000067595814,0.0001763538,0.0003636524,0.0010734783,0.009764661,0.000078181554,0.001743728,0.000018166415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006940321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011567659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006940321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027169002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031067536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013799846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385556024","doi":"10.1002/edn3.460","title":"A validated and optimized environmental<scp>DNA</scp>and<scp>RNA</scp>assay to detect Arctic grayling (<i>Thymallus arcticus</i>)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates; Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Grayling; Environmental DNA; Biology; Arctic; Rainbow trout; Ecology; Fishery; Trout; Habitat; Zoology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.010572739058766932,"score_gpt":0.19760146477241716,"score_spread":0.18702872571365023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385556024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8170756,0.0004868232,0.17753413,0.00010533845,0.000045584347,0.00046736034,0.0016914825,0.0005735821,0.0020201346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7948841,0.00034487637,0.1969975,0.00022703795,0.000021568429,0.000647242,0.0024651976,0.00011989461,0.00429258],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882394,0.00027374152,0.00008132663,0.00036335344,0.00038001008,0.0000776096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993894,0.00017225396,0.00014321065,0.000051637024,0.000197897,0.000045645367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012136353,0.00074999337,0.00034535772,0.00042364077,0.00027511382,0.00047939594,0.00031770076,0.0004800535,0.00061231176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011114479,0.00031613687,0.00037574815,0.00019682568,0.0004682281,0.00019608485,0.00035728098,0.0004038858,0.00048591904],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029568397,0.000026247311,0.0031086602,0.00004820231,0.000012508972,0.000020387168,0.000025450712,0.0008133028,0.9937028,0.00004374362,0.00004221468,0.0021267668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007553121,0.00030705554,0.009931168,0.00001349019,0.00003807517,0.000070522685,0.00003774624,0.0072939107,0.9807546,0.000035945,0.0014941761,0.000015728747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020541325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056934576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020541325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000378399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083145016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006418407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386094226","doi":"10.1002/edn3.463","title":"Processes driving individual variation in environmental <scp>DNA</scp> deposition rates in <i>Daphnia magna</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada First Research Excellence Fund","keywords":"Daphnia magna; Biology; Environmental DNA; Abiotic component; Deposition (geology); Population; Intraspecific competition; Abundance (ecology); Daphnia; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Zoology; Biodiversity; Zooplankton","score_opus":0.008844783620425576,"score_gpt":0.19492719510126835,"score_spread":0.18608241148084279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386094226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99833244,0.00005856212,0.0011561633,0.000016631619,0.0000023337373,0.0000042506776,0.00019776085,0.000014346995,0.00021745046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992537,0.000015311338,0.00045033763,0.000016001952,0.0000011692521,0.00000645682,0.00011960342,0.000004945227,0.00013228519],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999798,0.000035989662,0.000012839488,0.000100099795,0.000032834094,0.000020317742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994373,0.00018728725,0.0002065178,0.00006150862,0.0000681039,0.000039253726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045879482,0.00011398774,0.00017190479,0.00032274344,0.00020380867,0.00037341044,0.00022524447,0.00020278944,0.0005798673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006167138,0.00016859247,0.00014596428,0.00017636434,0.00026307174,0.00019564206,0.00025075153,0.00022920492,0.00010423102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002517261,0.000066530076,0.4080387,0.00008762202,0.00019911674,0.00008999099,0.00043077132,0.0019010194,0.5763682,0.00025714448,0.00029497116,0.0120142335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000158096,0.000047483067,0.99106604,0.0000023128546,0.000021068836,0.000049850223,0.00007605653,0.002355654,0.0061007156,0.000054583244,0.00021789262,0.0000067450337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024817183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047913366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024817183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028515857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092473056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0049344897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386224620","doi":"10.1002/edn3.467","title":"Detection of fish sedimentary <scp>DNA</scp> in aquatic systems: A review of methodological challenges and future opportunities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; McGill University; University of Guelph; University of Victoria","funders":"Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research; Liber Ero Foundation; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Metagenomics; Aquatic ecosystem; Biology; Abiotic component; Ecology; Population dynamics of fisheries; Population; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity; Fishery","score_opus":0.16866179237658047,"score_gpt":0.2973472483486995,"score_spread":0.12868545597211906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386224620","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006206283,0.99537295,0.002711556,0.00055137346,0.00020102365,0.00001801417,0.00008470166,0.000024304141,0.0004153783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004546825,0.98904246,0.005147589,0.00048187477,0.0003322858,0.000045840505,0.0001403553,0.000016241249,0.0002465517],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968167,0.00076697016,0.0005027194,0.0008633629,0.0009492868,0.00010087552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98668647,0.009250714,0.001375114,0.00031523986,0.00219169,0.00018078135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008723099,0.0012210371,0.0021100512,0.0062888972,0.0004962684,0.0022153817,0.0020892443,0.0021395579,0.0010275665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008269545,0.00091018045,0.0011886032,0.0047015795,0.0027236016,0.0032133334,0.0010643237,0.001608056,0.0008629679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007950022,0.0000637925,0.0034831814,0.07365452,0.0003653124,0.00030598344,0.000498824,0.0009533538,0.010572545,0.0038951528,0.007177382,0.8989505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022146314,0.0005075427,0.019595634,0.03908619,0.0013948896,0.003591114,0.0012771621,0.0023267888,0.021043265,0.010221702,0.90056604,0.0003674417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037968175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033505112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008723099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011180573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024563605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046132684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386224646","doi":"10.1002/edn3.469","title":"A nitrifier‐enriched microbial community contributes to the degradation of environmental <scp>DNA</scp>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Mesocosm; Environmental DNA; Biology; Silver carp; Microbial population biology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.013654776893106332,"score_gpt":0.20013661586884154,"score_spread":0.18648183897573523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386224646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984913,0.00010873667,0.0007970233,0.000019979192,0.000003399559,0.000007684615,0.0001627408,0.000016439702,0.00039269862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972319,0.00009879757,0.0013170316,0.000048032587,0.0000037371215,0.000018995834,0.00031656254,0.000008893459,0.00095600897],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997539,0.00002396998,0.000021095413,0.0001088994,0.00005776647,0.000034321794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996402,0.00003945703,0.00014527237,0.000027616203,0.00009284105,0.000054543423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023900384,0.00034630232,0.0002089068,0.00026987458,0.00030471265,0.0005784947,0.00019924619,0.00030078006,0.00075672846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002364438,0.00017013712,0.00016592104,0.00013437682,0.0003088073,0.00021859027,0.00037324938,0.00030980076,0.00019053373],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071145994,0.000015525606,0.01655643,0.00003916762,0.000009696348,0.000036505102,0.000040426352,0.00007734419,0.9816381,0.000015298932,0.00001691633,0.0014834296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059117037,0.0004783164,0.54899454,0.000030492012,0.00003983729,0.00030214773,0.00039930598,0.0016476738,0.44678932,0.00010242012,0.0011960333,0.000014115676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003988397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053934646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003988397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034011016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002915318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007930338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386371864","doi":"10.1002/edn3.472","title":"Critical considerations for communicating environmental <scp>DNA</scp> science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; U.S. Department of Commerce; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"CLARITY; Transparency (behavior); Environmental DNA; Workflow; Consistency (knowledge bases); Citizen science; Computer science; Scale (ratio); Knowledge management; Data science; Process management; Environmental resource management; Business; Ecology; Environmental science; Computer security; Biology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.02951507677489546,"score_gpt":0.25620093288429907,"score_spread":0.22668585610940362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386371864","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058220145,0.0037820947,0.050880667,0.90655833,0.008226632,0.00064139493,0.000108838656,0.0004183442,0.023561629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37658167,0.013710466,0.26738197,0.31311268,0.01193661,0.003518128,0.00034381254,0.0010614474,0.012353283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.62704563,0.28270212,0.027342161,0.008304073,0.046613302,0.007992707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39268023,0.47240245,0.023257395,0.019991752,0.07441736,0.017250823],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.31528214,0.0019532905,0.0017340751,0.00578762,0.024338957,0.04118117,0.006756142,0.023027886,0.009593691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3833375,0.0023197422,0.0020727462,0.0037534537,0.034918282,0.032951325,0.02355851,0.03492984,0.0033807405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023632153,0.00029311597,0.0038492733,0.004607625,0.00021292531,0.0044814423,0.1839804,0.0037306172,0.005367319,0.2771,0.27682528,0.23931572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068751986,0.00024251759,0.0015125648,0.005077619,0.00008757177,0.001115548,0.11904124,0.0032537212,0.0032231614,0.26959446,0.5964238,0.0003590512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0097414525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065460093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95881885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01666304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056733925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84437907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387519772","doi":"10.1002/edn3.461","title":"How much is enough? Examining the sampling effort necessary to estimate mean <scp>eDNA</scp> concentrations in lentic systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Sépaq; Université Laval; Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Replicate; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Habitat; Sample size determination; Ecology; Statistics; Lake ecosystem; Aggregate (composite); Biology; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0317125309242281,"score_gpt":0.2445661668547536,"score_spread":0.2128536359305255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387519772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99554574,0.00008307479,0.003477167,0.00009768804,0.0000034426118,0.000027769229,0.00006447826,0.000017803808,0.0006829301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792564,0.000025395786,0.0018252847,0.000040344796,0.0000044059766,0.00003162474,0.00004758927,0.000008429408,0.0000913812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968087,0.0014959502,0.00022221419,0.00054316747,0.00064475916,0.00028519402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97619176,0.014913862,0.0043524853,0.0014562054,0.0023520363,0.00073352957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00993951,0.00023662827,0.00036629033,0.0009826752,0.0011191511,0.0013333757,0.00079151726,0.000499984,0.0007705061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029469935,0.0003261191,0.00046814932,0.00058193906,0.0011470891,0.001560948,0.000931925,0.0003830067,0.00009583976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002285502,0.00017318125,0.9386565,0.000128453,0.00035377083,0.00010873018,0.00065307296,0.013121287,0.009740258,0.0006373076,0.00026455687,0.03593436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013383055,0.00037867847,0.96564084,0.00002206859,0.00007578916,0.000055117544,0.00046339392,0.0283682,0.0036735607,0.0006880016,0.0005977031,0.000023238563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040473945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08254091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040473945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036433202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016428595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0804767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388127877","doi":"10.1002/edn3.485","title":"Seas the DNA? Limited detection of cetaceans by low‐volume environmental DNA transect surveys","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Porpoise; Environmental DNA; Cetacea; Phocoena; Transect; Fishery; Whale; Humpback whale; Balaenoptera; Limiting; Environmental science; Biology; Oceanography; Ecology; Biodiversity; Geology","score_opus":0.008213518523890496,"score_gpt":0.17563191606175688,"score_spread":0.1674183975378664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388127877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97660655,0.0012062216,0.016432768,0.00032665685,0.000038635604,0.00008808215,0.00069013925,0.00008029331,0.0045306277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98808265,0.00032986535,0.009590936,0.0003343864,0.000014734078,0.00005324635,0.0003156567,0.000013947988,0.0012646315],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961301,0.0010731817,0.00030225795,0.0009766553,0.0012181234,0.00029968933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936832,0.002041381,0.0015813265,0.0005742816,0.0019073711,0.00021253063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035849344,0.00036818825,0.0003581313,0.0012402885,0.00055466173,0.0012937536,0.001011271,0.0005715875,0.0013226168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008092298,0.0003657087,0.0001679268,0.0008094855,0.001185556,0.0007257485,0.0008745831,0.00039063962,0.00041410525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010247786,0.00003397976,0.84988594,0.00042650723,0.00012398166,0.00017597651,0.0015259818,0.0011150622,0.10052925,0.00027582372,0.00046967054,0.045335285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071722193,0.00023449048,0.9458051,0.00021477728,0.00009114507,0.00044070106,0.002444096,0.002199236,0.041080084,0.00036801942,0.0070933243,0.000021913485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037083376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.130927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037083376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082956156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005339228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07373506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389071193","doi":"10.1002/edn3.488","title":"Beyond life: Louis Bernatchez's (1960–2023) enduring legacy on molecular ecology, conservation, and the science of environmental DNA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Conservation biology; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007801087656279644,"score_gpt":0.1934995132072873,"score_spread":0.18569842555100766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389071193","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001375558,0.10102415,0.0004830485,0.53132737,0.36548585,0.0000054516977,0.0000517792,0.000035564422,0.0014493037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005758552,0.08404435,0.0012158739,0.41562343,0.4402821,0.00003834309,0.00010525116,0.00019462203,0.052737467],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641305,0.00095403957,0.00030907922,0.0007266753,0.0013080107,0.00028917694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834547,0.0066214846,0.00082857633,0.00036908378,0.0053640082,0.00336208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009513023,0.0014821169,0.0013544378,0.0020242608,0.0030505396,0.007373315,0.0017940712,0.0073280907,0.0036583808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018857548,0.00074621453,0.00069931755,0.0013306153,0.004451464,0.005837246,0.0025615445,0.020397922,0.003058554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032449843,0.000005254008,0.00013225459,0.00009499821,0.000012229829,0.00008395068,0.00015994154,0.000025323543,0.00009308494,0.002151869,0.9872,0.010008582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008097452,0.000007732776,0.00022800674,0.00024936,0.0000073373076,0.00016140076,0.0001308415,0.0000284691,0.00009011467,0.0026163887,0.99645656,0.00001575117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013538146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026792612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013538146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029883715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059464276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050310254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389085122","doi":"10.1002/edn3.494","title":"Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> biomonitoring in biodiversity hotspots: A case study of fishes of the Okavango Delta","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK; Royal Society","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Biodiversity hotspot; Fauna; Delta","score_opus":0.016630900886639686,"score_gpt":0.20908323129882278,"score_spread":0.1924523304121831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389085122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999188,0.00009555171,0.00010956583,0.000077777426,0.0000015271506,0.000011797986,0.000044945788,0.000002103189,0.0004686812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880826,0.00018524726,0.0005376967,0.000043406708,0.0000024785252,0.000008681796,0.000043791104,0.000002012292,0.0003684187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975985,0.00006102445,0.000017289534,0.000042350537,0.00004318974,0.00007632503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951315,0.00011737425,0.0001530643,0.00003324608,0.000090704205,0.000092479335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045671128,0.00026844392,0.00015862216,0.0015232263,0.0016981355,0.00075572706,0.0004355654,0.0005310104,0.00085000665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058737386,0.00017525528,0.00018437185,0.0015834363,0.0010101362,0.0004072824,0.0012484274,0.00037782805,0.000077597055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045756417,0.00006415896,0.94648623,0.00015540404,0.000043445256,0.015584409,0.016768182,0.00029784336,0.0050629657,0.00024643572,0.00029797034,0.014947127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023146677,0.000067966335,0.9418788,0.00009793297,0.000047818194,0.0043526036,0.049706277,0.0004359803,0.0010244448,0.00012916246,0.0022404587,0.000016241016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06516192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1859584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06516192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011176788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090265385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12956524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389390904","doi":"10.1002/edn3.493","title":"Permafrost microbial communities follow shifts in vegetation, soils, and megafauna extinctions in Late Pleistocene NW North America","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MaRS; University of Alberta; McMaster University; Tula Foundation; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Belmont Forum","keywords":"Megafauna; Ecology; Permafrost; Holocene; Pleistocene; Steppe; Vegetation (pathology); Beringia; Ecosystem; Biology; Paleontology; Arctic","score_opus":0.010594135923395562,"score_gpt":0.20346477881885,"score_spread":0.19287064289545444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389390904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992949,0.00020875172,0.0000353478,0.000020537023,0.0000010766379,9.947221e-7,0.0001433716,0.0000026649357,0.00029250147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941087,0.000119221346,0.00007225735,0.0000223609,0.0000037676666,0.0000021096776,0.00025364416,0.0000019759289,0.00011374813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992466,0.000011986277,0.0000039269135,0.000026145008,0.000016208773,0.000017031094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997516,0.00003367027,0.00009420437,0.000014793126,0.00005552559,0.00005024861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023931351,0.00013511124,0.0001393695,0.0008307655,0.00048043183,0.0004208754,0.00015160191,0.00021697413,0.0013675472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029830236,0.000111518704,0.00012514525,0.0006373176,0.00030804012,0.00026551163,0.0003062466,0.00020833116,0.00011819704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001162178,0.000023222068,0.9732781,0.00004225475,0.00006315327,0.00009151937,0.0013503634,0.00008574194,0.016266193,0.000053258853,0.0001379877,0.008491975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.4884592e-7,0.0000041749895,0.9996803,0.0000021666688,0.0000021083774,0.000014215345,0.00012307409,0.000020664182,0.000060092938,0.0000063139914,0.00008587794,4.4139276e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017942509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046169918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003406082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022331522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03567618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389728181","doi":"10.1002/edn3.503","title":"Development of novel LAMP and qPCR assays for rapid and specific identification of Bronze birch borer (<i>Agrilus anxius</i>)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Canadian Forest Service; Kungl. Skogs- och Lantbruksakademien; Università degli Studi di Padova; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Biology; Agrilus; Frass; Botany; PEST analysis; Larva","score_opus":0.014731890140112194,"score_gpt":0.21212582646104824,"score_spread":0.19739393632093605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389728181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7341293,0.0025606928,0.2522084,0.00038783206,0.00018589389,0.00041717096,0.0023081112,0.0021134845,0.0056891614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74321604,0.001206488,0.24203555,0.0005328526,0.000056052315,0.000747335,0.0035279295,0.00012736631,0.008550382],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889225,0.00024105563,0.000064218606,0.00036520028,0.00032030334,0.00011696979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940217,0.00016599253,0.00017504623,0.00003383544,0.00017629098,0.00004665236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094728684,0.00079360657,0.0003630577,0.0004953208,0.00020117653,0.00044749797,0.0004598871,0.00060412125,0.0010519285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082259055,0.00039840522,0.00039499468,0.00019481777,0.0003279258,0.00035093742,0.00035060148,0.0006809112,0.0006728057],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020814636,0.000015570899,0.0005689437,0.000042946285,0.000004020225,0.000008013775,0.000016679298,0.00008699157,0.9970715,0.000049005517,0.000058365345,0.002057065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071353593,0.0002623045,0.0061299596,0.000019823336,0.00002839437,0.00014854182,0.000051742332,0.0037315334,0.9863579,0.00005780317,0.0031861053,0.000018734647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081718265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023536193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0010519285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004195739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003155936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0050097704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390012933","doi":"10.1002/edn3.495","title":"Rethinking trophic interactions in agricultural landscapes through tracking secondary feeding","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Agricultural Research Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Predation; Biology; Predator; Generalist and specialist species; Biological pest control; Ecology; Arthropod mouthparts; Trophic level; Habitat","score_opus":0.048990458214961084,"score_gpt":0.21815271083876936,"score_spread":0.16916225262380827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390012933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99533147,0.0003370939,0.0031951724,0.000018010156,0.000006248647,0.000030688036,0.00040328063,0.00007331892,0.00060469314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991213,0.00015672237,0.007695871,0.000049190505,0.0000040039545,0.000054723896,0.00032754897,0.0000121880275,0.00048666916],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998099,0.000030306986,0.000008130406,0.000080949765,0.00004021998,0.000030533793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928206,0.00018161182,0.00028687532,0.0000405213,0.00012707284,0.00008188104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030607847,0.00032221279,0.00033790193,0.0007907565,0.00023696263,0.0004184718,0.00023082408,0.00030168355,0.0013978201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049051805,0.00020661703,0.00019842605,0.00033695876,0.00015750984,0.00035652393,0.00031272584,0.0003566373,0.00036013642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028647078,0.00014119047,0.29202184,0.00027235763,0.000089527115,0.000140254,0.00034910665,0.00045002167,0.67387354,0.000053624208,0.00020562616,0.032116566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008550935,0.0006867869,0.92605966,0.000034704717,0.00007257593,0.00025137688,0.0003775686,0.006220686,0.065010056,0.000109985296,0.0011462959,0.000021678361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019516727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053277994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019516727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002013026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010706281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004676163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390398509","doi":"10.1002/edn3.508","title":"Enumeration potential of environmental <scp>DNA</scp> for Pacific salmon stock assessments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Genome British Columbia","keywords":"Oncorhynchus; Chinook wind; Juvenile; Fishery; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology","score_opus":0.012588114187794444,"score_gpt":0.22450834155227165,"score_spread":0.2119202273644772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390398509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.981974,0.0003763953,0.0114019215,0.00011864536,0.000022111728,0.00008222401,0.0017270646,0.00010628387,0.0041913334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98459065,0.00018089713,0.012817275,0.000062056366,0.000011436114,0.000071472095,0.0010848492,0.0000094897905,0.0011718149],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993155,0.00023317263,0.000049770944,0.0001280767,0.00023584382,0.000037586564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851376,0.00034169326,0.00026264388,0.00006319783,0.0007248642,0.00009380015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017254404,0.00036644246,0.00015475304,0.0013517869,0.00024991162,0.0007570556,0.0004367424,0.00031429052,0.0013497287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002220731,0.00016104472,0.00017460309,0.0007714402,0.00017936439,0.00050423836,0.0005128532,0.00020791162,0.00041388068],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014483236,0.000049258026,0.90459013,0.00007656288,0.00005541409,0.00006249947,0.00008517731,0.0022620412,0.020549778,0.000115206865,0.00032748238,0.071681544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017655902,0.00089075515,0.8851245,0.00014278216,0.00019134299,0.00020366005,0.0009322014,0.042959817,0.06386789,0.00056276604,0.005056326,0.000050364517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074181026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024559356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074181026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044304147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000572099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014749825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390617206","doi":"10.1002/edn3.505","title":"<scp>eDNA</scp> metabarcoding as a means to track distributions of different fish species in a protected area","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Electrofishing; Trout; Environmental DNA; Biology; Fishery; Fishing; Population; National park; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.015281764035386832,"score_gpt":0.20559395705171754,"score_spread":0.1903121930163307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390617206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98219943,0.00029062273,0.013713824,0.00008160738,0.000017892877,0.00005614439,0.0018983071,0.00018649464,0.0015556071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447808,0.000111290305,0.05189788,0.00010623994,0.000011510739,0.000081044134,0.002023441,0.00003223461,0.00095555885],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998129,0.00003760793,0.000014828413,0.000077805955,0.000042617805,0.00001422073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994709,0.000093304945,0.00023371808,0.000027969043,0.00013741464,0.000036673147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044944134,0.00021550246,0.00017437583,0.00167183,0.00030660533,0.00030049199,0.00027482834,0.0001627105,0.0011436499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004991369,0.00009360967,0.00016182422,0.0010060372,0.00021040345,0.00027991674,0.000331649,0.00020133198,0.00025224613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000415523,0.00009018037,0.5522836,0.00027001102,0.00013369652,0.00029704446,0.00052183215,0.0009780724,0.35817254,0.0002312746,0.00090428884,0.08570199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011548206,0.00022714084,0.95013136,0.000039184877,0.000072654395,0.0003324853,0.00060329394,0.005916777,0.039145697,0.00018847812,0.0033131242,0.000018246745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039318404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013251254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039318404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018374427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022028267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007817924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391219343","doi":"10.1002/edn3.329","title":"Cover Image","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.010621418286544924,"score_gpt":0.2097170031073078,"score_spread":0.19909558482076287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391219343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035182037,0.00010704921,0.0005485691,0.0005206398,0.0007567265,0.00012536498,0.043092053,0.00194992,0.95254785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021090114,0.00013557688,0.0008278746,0.000270495,0.00019093858,0.000079414735,0.025742795,0.0015956383,0.96904826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998785,0.000008206108,0.000004036729,0.000028681026,0.00006050444,0.000020017067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950373,0.000051354444,0.000014254739,0.000056359986,0.00025778872,0.000116395124],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014817448,0.0006836594,0.00046841873,0.0011852008,0.0012371141,0.0017256086,0.0006978416,0.0006656262,0.92919654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007196125,0.0003003694,0.00033412757,0.0016017862,0.00016900143,0.0014097857,0.0010698859,0.0010259222,0.81423193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007710603,0.000006905626,0.000051381943,0.00002179459,3.889109e-7,0.000011614241,0.000009110038,0.000019260659,0.00007125075,0.00023460483,0.99049056,0.009075471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006504168,0.0000041803783,0.0008114649,0.000026100222,7.1446124e-7,0.000031552976,0.000036907215,0.00006816007,0.000069239315,0.0001882461,0.99875367,0.0000032043731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010453329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02333528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07080346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000682675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048153955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10099256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391854619","doi":"10.1002/edn3.517","title":"<scp>eDNA</scp> metabarcoding reveals riverine fish community structure and climate associations in northeastern Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Ontario Forest Research Institute; Dalhousie University; Yukon Department of Environment; Government of Newfoundland and Labrador; Natural Resources Canada; Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fish <Actinopterygii>; Community structure; Geography; Ecology; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.009639766493133146,"score_gpt":0.19514534186530574,"score_spread":0.1855055753721726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391854619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907086,0.00037476726,0.0010903501,0.00014372826,0.000005805261,0.000016711192,0.0051568015,0.000040160037,0.0024631503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936087,0.00020952926,0.001980595,0.00009067258,0.0000028832756,0.000012159192,0.0024417513,0.000015465837,0.0016381936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973935,0.000017598211,0.000013959566,0.00009508352,0.00006860428,0.00006536296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989164,0.00007377314,0.00016344545,0.000054030803,0.0006518835,0.00014042578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038505963,0.00015350588,0.0001711712,0.0016321253,0.0015393676,0.00067160354,0.00045511368,0.00014950175,0.0013822997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006945474,0.000105824,0.00018381295,0.0024936954,0.00046249243,0.0001531363,0.0003736953,0.0002068309,0.00016998501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057496563,0.000012245917,0.9648775,0.000048455484,0.00007742315,0.00009400492,0.0009005262,0.00059739855,0.013258312,0.000179761,0.0014972843,0.018399699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014582371,0.000004605739,0.9970611,0.000011376844,0.000014531013,0.000031182113,0.00042842035,0.0004210282,0.0005124164,0.000021838092,0.0014866056,0.0000055080072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9647755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035224497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006111509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062563927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07086384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392710158","doi":"10.1002/edn3.524","title":"<scp>DNA</scp> from dives: Species detection of humpback whales (<i>Megaptera novaeangliae</i>) from flukeprint <scp>eDNA</scp>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Raincoast Conservation Foundation; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Humpback whale; Fishery; Environmental DNA; Whale; Habitat; Biology; Porpoise; Whaling; Invasive species; Population; Cetacea; Geography; Ecology; Biodiversity; Harbour","score_opus":0.010904406975507252,"score_gpt":0.1866070781015608,"score_spread":0.17570267112605353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392710158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899273,0.00018052162,0.0010704154,0.00004846419,0.000014469831,0.00010294889,0.0053265514,0.00004880244,0.0032804636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98605597,0.00019672792,0.004393449,0.00023336567,0.000009310923,0.00014937168,0.0055382713,0.00001673371,0.0034069167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970895,0.000017767794,0.000022757542,0.00007664024,0.00012802551,0.000045865912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994592,0.000052685573,0.00012580505,0.000024305205,0.00022612905,0.000111800204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017499928,0.0002492556,0.00013527522,0.001320081,0.0008092753,0.00041870866,0.0002738895,0.0003812803,0.0018971935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005953276,0.00011392103,0.00010845617,0.0010325153,0.00027916703,0.00011189205,0.000404597,0.00020063616,0.0006371979],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009267281,0.00003184601,0.84275824,0.00012550234,0.000036994268,0.0006500831,0.0011855005,0.00013854665,0.12794882,0.00004227756,0.0011130513,0.025876509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013221388,0.000042021675,0.99173915,0.000014924349,0.0000067745978,0.0002744622,0.00053546374,0.00011450138,0.0055069295,0.000008038975,0.0017523131,0.0000040191785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06568698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20972134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06568698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003450222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005283754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13060927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392731740","doi":"10.1002/edn3.511","title":"High‐volume plankton tow net sampling improves <scp>eDNA</scp> detection of invasive zebra mussels (<i>Dreissena polymorpha</i>) in recently infested lakes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Dreissena; Plankton; Biology; Environmental DNA; Sampling (signal processing); Invasive species; Ecology; Bivalvia; Fishery; Mollusca; Biodiversity; Filter (signal processing)","score_opus":0.008857011650294197,"score_gpt":0.1937991041382929,"score_spread":0.1849420924879987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392731740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99855715,0.000075312884,0.000911421,0.000013227828,0.0000032817038,0.000014448148,0.00009852627,0.000021859581,0.00030470666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579763,0.00006934148,0.0033894524,0.000044728225,0.000002700976,0.000009811703,0.00021130184,0.000004741428,0.00047017375],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996263,0.00004638932,0.00002461257,0.00012160779,0.00013327692,0.000047791775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995229,0.000093707,0.00011790707,0.00002425752,0.0001769924,0.0000642246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037115856,0.00037282534,0.00020207299,0.00041639185,0.00041024544,0.0007501914,0.00020322631,0.0003315712,0.00056935736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006161207,0.00030553385,0.00020188173,0.00022740864,0.00034617985,0.0002683119,0.00035270094,0.00023691905,0.00016600871],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031680652,0.00007333761,0.45959097,0.000093504066,0.00007048532,0.00007466306,0.00034777736,0.00037085018,0.52864736,0.000016740838,0.00010647321,0.010291002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067095575,0.00040199267,0.9371227,0.000014817423,0.00005710711,0.000120065495,0.0002714624,0.0017837908,0.05959907,0.000010432839,0.00060267077,0.000009200022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041578326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15490489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041578326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061485596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036784651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082672596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392888377","doi":"10.1002/edn3.529","title":"Oomycete communities are influenced by land use and disease status in Christmas tree production in Southern Québec, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant Pathogens and Resistance","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation","keywords":"Oomycete; Phytophthora; Species richness; Biodiversity; Phytophthora cinnamomi; Threatened species; Context (archaeology); Geography; Ecology; Biology; Habitat; Botany","score_opus":0.007295566227947975,"score_gpt":0.1559182192216505,"score_spread":0.14862265299370253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392888377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972824,0.00030196068,0.00009756044,0.00006148145,0.0000045892784,0.000014375434,0.0012756875,0.0000067073192,0.00095524907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980611,0.00014022448,0.00016183018,0.000034591743,0.0000020265325,0.0000067566157,0.0007267979,0.00000300923,0.00086361426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970466,0.000022530738,0.000009542226,0.00007571857,0.00005507934,0.00013249932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999257,0.000053707583,0.00012531456,0.00001552459,0.0003088304,0.00023951249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021756787,0.0003420902,0.00024411059,0.001299141,0.0018534546,0.0011263759,0.0005924321,0.00030095043,0.0021273983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038152645,0.00015232207,0.0002082392,0.0022254824,0.00061776506,0.00020052673,0.00032304542,0.00027774085,0.00017244786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009014367,0.000038723087,0.9860377,0.000037415768,0.000040166382,0.00020605145,0.0013079186,0.00014169424,0.0042542843,0.000077141114,0.0006211357,0.0071477075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015353852,0.000011324023,0.9977291,0.000012421514,0.000006905331,0.00003083092,0.0012723259,0.00021284477,0.00008765933,0.0000068563127,0.00062419375,0.000004044341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98736924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99539196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012630761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011924996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007174222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08652234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393933133","doi":"10.1002/edn3.544","title":"Correction to “<scp>eDNA</scp> metabarcoding reveals riverine fish community structure and climate associations in northeastern Canada”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fish <Actinopterygii>; Community structure; Geography; Fishery; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.009171072142049132,"score_gpt":0.1998328350708495,"score_spread":0.19066176292880038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393933133","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006063781,0.00044299517,0.0028236725,0.088890515,0.89543456,0.000066724904,0.006312184,0.002635768,0.0027871958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05078866,0.004005616,0.024984414,0.2748473,0.23480994,0.0007874049,0.025403209,0.012545923,0.3718275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924595,0.0009972216,0.0014026539,0.00092453713,0.0033865122,0.0008295642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92009324,0.013466493,0.003001835,0.004069919,0.056537487,0.0028309352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060981433,0.0020432323,0.0023801893,0.0042472966,0.005784635,0.004208766,0.0043924013,0.006064548,0.11030262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10702995,0.001754435,0.0020893507,0.0036660782,0.0033619856,0.00230985,0.003693139,0.011898708,0.041364983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023721082,0.0000035220735,0.000100328274,0.00006658308,0.000009817662,0.00012783067,0.000052132287,0.000027883176,0.000075692114,0.00021853292,0.9971781,0.002115872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011447966,0.000020367754,0.0030072567,0.00042554724,0.00006955134,0.00082262687,0.00025897537,0.0005528091,0.0007468124,0.0017950018,0.9920855,0.00010100319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10002105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10440641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89997894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053617703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012002966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36899906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394825760","doi":"10.1002/edn3.530","title":"Quantifying the effect of water quality on eDNA degradation using microcosm and bioassay experiments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Microcosm; Bioassay; Phosphorus; Environmental chemistry; Degradation (telecommunications); Water quality; Chlorophyll a; Dissolved organic carbon; Biology; Chlorophyll; Environmental science; Ecology; Chemistry; Botany","score_opus":0.035385113562606055,"score_gpt":0.28252797574420535,"score_spread":0.2471428621815993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394825760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99136484,0.00043918664,0.0057234676,0.000043199045,0.000026943446,0.00042190816,0.0011721774,0.00006995219,0.0007382356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96837676,0.00080987974,0.025492074,0.0001913816,0.000018437428,0.00093367393,0.0016751245,0.000029889246,0.0024728668],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990626,0.00012815985,0.000100088386,0.00026579792,0.00035175582,0.00009165822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990447,0.00023908236,0.00027815648,0.000065442444,0.00029348632,0.000079089885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006359963,0.00062802667,0.00047629132,0.00039575962,0.00039131517,0.0006618069,0.00047065452,0.0005822273,0.0005151495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008973146,0.00024502326,0.00043910544,0.00044002806,0.00038603417,0.00031978873,0.000526457,0.0005206331,0.00014513211],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020405336,0.00018199979,0.009093166,0.00009096626,0.0000396931,0.000028781116,0.00010417405,0.00025815284,0.9871444,0.0000248291,0.000048945443,0.0027807725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031959764,0.0050930637,0.08448334,0.000018987976,0.00013259823,0.000118248834,0.0001916204,0.0026669577,0.9054047,0.000053499367,0.0017638956,0.000041112908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008833516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015793474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008833516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092654687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047614565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017564237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396706846","doi":"10.1002/edn3.553","title":"Monitoring and predicting the presence and abundance of juvenile Atlantic salmon in tributaries according to habitat characteristics using environmental <scp>DNA</scp>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tributary; Juvenile; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Fishery; Environmental science; Environmental DNA; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Biodiversity; Cartography","score_opus":0.011465423682303326,"score_gpt":0.21279152739312088,"score_spread":0.20132610371081755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396706846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99801266,0.000057472604,0.0013217402,0.000017311771,0.0000012648864,0.000010266673,0.0003191907,0.00003332651,0.00022661139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974147,0.000034627577,0.0019135661,0.000010905937,9.642541e-7,0.000008245354,0.0003802862,0.0000033790043,0.00023326975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987054,0.000026985212,0.0000073471833,0.00005006544,0.000018734047,0.000026238056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945956,0.00012099723,0.00013260677,0.000033807322,0.0001812855,0.000071749426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002832159,0.00026887222,0.00016598924,0.0006802473,0.0003546148,0.0005357397,0.00040870515,0.0002341749,0.0005650936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006718103,0.00013058899,0.00021537572,0.0006684981,0.00016463523,0.0001881959,0.00022172822,0.00016354171,0.00017185693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017852295,0.000012551725,0.99055,0.0000063440993,0.000025120204,0.000022184235,0.000030528034,0.0020017405,0.0021414317,0.000009035738,0.00008940648,0.0050938614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004716899,0.000036900114,0.95288134,0.000009683258,0.000025553478,0.000033862092,0.00031763068,0.04561996,0.000805088,0.000031812953,0.00022654301,0.000006953556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.387174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62089854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.387174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009787108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077325373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76984084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399774982","doi":"10.1002/edn3.578","title":"Systematic evaluation of the influence of Taq enzyme choice and amplification conditions on targeted environmental DNA assay performance and detection in field samples","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"DNA; Computational biology; Chromatography; Molecular biology; Environmental science; Chemistry; Biology; Biochemistry","score_opus":0.012059712438315119,"score_gpt":0.21881307400058345,"score_spread":0.20675336156226834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399774982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6701284,0.005655224,0.3141274,0.00036051607,0.00033853238,0.0041937474,0.0014201959,0.001025328,0.0027506417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52129114,0.003922435,0.46094882,0.0005355913,0.00008082403,0.00618607,0.0036691716,0.0008507522,0.0025151367],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.97013927,0.0113697555,0.004318964,0.004569324,0.008652455,0.00095026824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717753,0.013706207,0.003152208,0.00249966,0.008570943,0.00029557178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029035192,0.0020397254,0.0015189181,0.0015805215,0.0010409297,0.001376389,0.0014412833,0.0013107524,0.0009828802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03332693,0.0011333606,0.0010301165,0.0016642745,0.0017267138,0.0008669024,0.0015441733,0.0010631604,0.0007062168],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022528005,0.00032682318,0.0061699487,0.0008356889,0.00012584294,0.000092407055,0.00063766644,0.001709327,0.9753117,0.00016125749,0.00024458327,0.014159485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024209432,0.002123582,0.009928021,0.00014475599,0.00026493953,0.00021813292,0.00022873786,0.0037461347,0.97777337,0.00013489087,0.005336605,0.00007666276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025421942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066807843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029035192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078277837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016300506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15355462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399861094","doi":"10.1002/edn3.568","title":"Metal ions limit or enhance environmental <scp>DNA</scp> detectability in marine sediments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Université du Québec à Rimouski","keywords":"Metal ions in aqueous solution; Limit (mathematics); Metal; Ion; Environmental DNA; DNA; Detection limit; Environmental chemistry; Environmental science; Chemistry; Oceanography; Nanotechnology; Materials science; Geology; Ecology; Biology; Chromatography; Metallurgy; Biochemistry; Biodiversity; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009851273120672422,"score_gpt":0.21145312382388182,"score_spread":0.2016018507032094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399861094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993006,0.00075208594,0.0036512706,0.00014390009,0.000023127555,0.000032448446,0.00041816794,0.00008754625,0.0018855059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948974,0.00033347408,0.0032613399,0.00008401998,0.0000071101313,0.000024335706,0.00017881663,0.00001816753,0.001195242],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994986,0.000094352064,0.000042542288,0.00012594686,0.00015200353,0.00008652265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953127,0.00012559259,0.00014005722,0.000024502506,0.00013301121,0.000045682416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030559793,0.0003699275,0.00019973103,0.0003569754,0.00021285548,0.00067979266,0.0002748278,0.00043767245,0.0008494302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069311314,0.00017935448,0.00017521234,0.00019303749,0.00039586885,0.00022216265,0.00032965894,0.00025568006,0.00027837287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006373428,0.000010372295,0.0025121411,0.00010947813,0.0000110671745,0.000046745336,0.000023703305,0.00015491337,0.9954562,0.000033965465,0.000045395755,0.0015322434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059599365,0.00023974321,0.01955894,0.000034615674,0.000026702584,0.000096863165,0.00013518054,0.0011222862,0.97636205,0.00009347114,0.0023152917,0.000009018471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00356103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004472758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00356103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031599673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038520538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0070806146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400615168","doi":"10.1002/edn3.586","title":"Detection differences between eDNA and mid‐water trawls are driven by fish biomass and habitat preferences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Tula Foundation; McGill University","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biomass (ecology); Fishery; Environmental science; Fish habitat; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.010665226961129811,"score_gpt":0.18382263172606164,"score_spread":0.17315740476493183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400615168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99648523,0.00015315303,0.0016049175,0.000031796888,0.0000077780705,0.00002595934,0.00025850997,0.000023383434,0.0014093734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974063,0.00005831088,0.0016524497,0.00007269076,0.0000022599259,0.000023255443,0.00021471566,0.000010509395,0.0005594395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842274,0.00028657453,0.00010760061,0.00054202747,0.00041044698,0.00023057543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630594,0.0009451577,0.0011195856,0.00029282802,0.0009821334,0.0003544056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015487367,0.00042038964,0.00038405642,0.0010057747,0.0007156477,0.0009710477,0.0007705604,0.00029479715,0.0012991391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005827538,0.00038470956,0.00027755555,0.0009352512,0.0005760951,0.0004884304,0.00095379486,0.00033745595,0.00016976845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095568685,0.000016079164,0.9831956,0.00003556404,0.00016105369,0.000023195922,0.00031292794,0.00020451218,0.010119623,0.000036743495,0.00010451597,0.0056945574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014576019,0.00001607601,0.99868375,0.000007331453,0.000025219892,0.000020153413,0.00021040413,0.0004440162,0.00048015572,0.000015948837,0.00009162792,0.000003872062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27148476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6291711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27148476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001767751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001086483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5398091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400926086","doi":"10.1002/edn3.590","title":"Enhancing metabarcoding of freshwater biotic communities: A new online tool for primer selection and exploring data from 14 primer pairs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"3M (Canada); Parks Canada; York University; St. Lawrence River Institute of Environmental Sciences; McGill University; Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Primer (cosmetics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Biology; Computational biology; Ecology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Chemistry","score_opus":0.06966734139842891,"score_gpt":0.24924167534915326,"score_spread":0.17957433395072436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400926086","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03849076,0.00070361263,0.90317285,0.00030636438,0.00012812701,0.000775783,0.01408822,0.040051196,0.0022831287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01767047,0.00008795071,0.97374314,0.00018891356,0.00001416422,0.00067450013,0.005369963,0.0016414748,0.0006094094],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99258935,0.0026351498,0.00086966535,0.0022859355,0.0013067872,0.0003130658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881451,0.007517794,0.0010649395,0.001316562,0.0016899323,0.00026561608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01047769,0.0025583194,0.0016858355,0.003488057,0.001227024,0.0021855647,0.0023051745,0.001519847,0.0072747446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021434184,0.0018435804,0.0023436707,0.002729841,0.000698077,0.0017797414,0.0025086817,0.0022481924,0.005201797],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002246102,0.00090541405,0.026255151,0.0043891785,0.0015776717,0.000969069,0.0016586046,0.011983463,0.44236946,0.0046179746,0.02933459,0.47369334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074305804,0.0008859962,0.01767732,0.00065723143,0.00096699764,0.0017207406,0.00039868618,0.1815842,0.6527731,0.009157006,0.13286789,0.0005677088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011370996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039075506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01047769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006106287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020830075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055411994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402413872","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70006","title":"Development of <scp>eDNA</scp> Protocols for Detection of Endangered White Sturgeon (<i>Acipenser transmontanus</i>) in the Wild","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada); Government of British Columbia; University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Victoria; BC Hydro (Canada)","funders":"Ministry of Environment; BC Hydro; Genome British Columbia","keywords":"Sturgeon; Endangered species; Acipenser; White (mutation); Fishery; Biology; Zoology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Habitat; Genetics; Gene","score_opus":0.01648178912467737,"score_gpt":0.22456625892252183,"score_spread":0.20808446979784445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402413872","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3971539,0.00068832474,0.5814339,0.00043821862,0.00023628041,0.0039053939,0.0034173492,0.003412648,0.009313967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2776957,0.00066374446,0.6976003,0.0011744453,0.00006431131,0.0057235644,0.008017366,0.0007708732,0.008289759],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.997883,0.0004784619,0.0002429092,0.00059452973,0.00066178537,0.00013931168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998201,0.0003566306,0.0003735757,0.00023016374,0.0007290394,0.000109540924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002782843,0.00095035497,0.00040618997,0.0012454138,0.00049822044,0.00053480273,0.0009851565,0.00076057855,0.0027863958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028392058,0.0007895758,0.0007240536,0.00038876463,0.0008899703,0.0006417396,0.0007918442,0.0012301579,0.0021123064],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033503682,0.00003646671,0.0014367786,0.00011595366,0.000013344078,0.000037966205,0.00006997513,0.00030681398,0.9922273,0.00017311648,0.00026006406,0.0052888156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021569575,0.00065725914,0.009779017,0.0000917968,0.000046451813,0.0002412382,0.0001089563,0.005219566,0.9763485,0.00024135166,0.007208801,0.000035518762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014509631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00534427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027863958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005623295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009133201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014717221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402992801","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70019","title":"Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Detects Predators at Higher Rates Than Electrofishing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Electrofishing; Environmental DNA; Predation; Environmental science; Fishery; Biology; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.010092145885942864,"score_gpt":0.20054053474285977,"score_spread":0.1904483888569169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402992801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98951834,0.0009586624,0.006878863,0.000038351922,0.0000294069,0.00004721296,0.00035303712,0.0000838352,0.0020923652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817255,0.00041894856,0.013931357,0.0001517381,0.000013606756,0.00009268711,0.0004370097,0.000040040413,0.0031890532],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981567,0.00023415679,0.00015875316,0.0007197077,0.0006330016,0.000097655204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507326,0.0013454552,0.001777592,0.00030892954,0.0012707227,0.00022412259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009524403,0.00042511005,0.0005001077,0.0014802078,0.00036416523,0.0007617337,0.00047066848,0.00046311208,0.0017726362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022308591,0.0002785903,0.00028871818,0.0008353676,0.00044917047,0.0007307359,0.00092508027,0.0005066692,0.00046858058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041016797,0.000087414,0.2539108,0.00041501928,0.000117174044,0.00013833007,0.00041208975,0.00022414679,0.71486974,0.000083795,0.00009095506,0.029240415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049358555,0.00073145167,0.88856566,0.00006299479,0.0001299104,0.00043694323,0.0005583057,0.00085230195,0.10666293,0.0001241226,0.0018441265,0.000026237954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011726673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002976896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017726362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041230433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027436388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005930066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403358825","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70027","title":"Multi‐Environment Quantification of Parasite and Intermediate Host <scp>DNA</scp> on Pasture for Fine‐Scale Disease Risk Assessment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Parasite hosting; Host (biology); Pasture; Scale (ratio); DNA; Biology; Computational biology; Disease; Genetics; Computer science; Ecology; Medicine; Geography; World Wide Web; Pathology; Cartography","score_opus":0.010785715406380977,"score_gpt":0.2347270890308553,"score_spread":0.2239413736244743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403358825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98264414,0.0005423315,0.011097531,0.000029844594,0.000012379558,0.00006676058,0.0035740754,0.00018543084,0.0018475681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97683287,0.00027068413,0.01881827,0.00006640039,0.0000073102206,0.000071742485,0.0023631644,0.000024933059,0.0015445718],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995895,0.000056569024,0.000018308963,0.00017254511,0.00011932012,0.0000437582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965405,0.0000676619,0.000120776116,0.000024328314,0.00009673171,0.000036520913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041003877,0.00033766558,0.00033404285,0.0010250517,0.00035479284,0.00060544006,0.00032187352,0.0004588648,0.0014437725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038895666,0.00018891612,0.00021525132,0.00068507536,0.00026060725,0.00028190046,0.00035154214,0.00025536187,0.0005145619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032710496,0.00015687059,0.37381938,0.00035189794,0.00016412232,0.00023751557,0.00049301324,0.0022748443,0.5762473,0.00013778254,0.00037898097,0.045411192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041531157,0.00044560828,0.9213429,0.000061190796,0.000107217376,0.0002626226,0.00045642344,0.010436225,0.06354072,0.00014071392,0.003174007,0.000028126307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035217062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012430959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035217062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024800183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016162485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0070024133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403359691","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70022","title":"<scp>V9</scp> Hypervariable Region Metabarcoding Primers for Euglenozoa and Metamonada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Protist diversity and phylogeny","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Grantová Agentura České Republiky","keywords":"Hypervariable region; Biology; Genetics; Gene","score_opus":0.010289476160394776,"score_gpt":0.1961162352438078,"score_spread":0.18582675908341303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403359691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6122084,0.0056940713,0.30148885,0.0007464685,0.0009371746,0.002463958,0.052728873,0.004513435,0.019218717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28283048,0.0012250916,0.66555685,0.0008012841,0.000068415015,0.0026588992,0.037726194,0.00073014514,0.008402681],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985424,0.00027886586,0.00022752989,0.0005319761,0.0002655501,0.00015371307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989774,0.00024329855,0.00032772296,0.000104366336,0.0002899673,0.000057234083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010726184,0.0010819894,0.00082384126,0.0018575646,0.0005367205,0.00067728426,0.0010409738,0.00086249155,0.0058845324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022051276,0.00059830374,0.0009554983,0.0012090626,0.00039839666,0.0004947605,0.0006543333,0.0010886851,0.003387695],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025906847,0.00004884661,0.0032228772,0.0004970579,0.00003228973,0.00019085321,0.00015209602,0.00025317652,0.9772059,0.0005808293,0.0011768026,0.016380247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010173037,0.0005669827,0.065150455,0.0003621586,0.00021824228,0.0012153113,0.0003197735,0.006729077,0.84227985,0.0007703191,0.0821795,0.00010654838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012588138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036872867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058845324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032970984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084524095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019685686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403543081","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70012","title":"Interlaboratory Evaluation of <i>Bretziella fagacearum</i> Molecular Detection Assays to Guide the <scp>eDNA</scp> Monitoring of Oak Wilt Disease","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and Fungal Interactions Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada; Michigan Department of Natural Resources; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Wilt disease; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.012584339906389377,"score_gpt":0.2855804357897637,"score_spread":0.27299609588337437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403543081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48000458,0.0045730444,0.47849217,0.0009780504,0.0018670523,0.009656657,0.0057400796,0.005440616,0.013247764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60747224,0.0008833426,0.361857,0.0018182526,0.00032802136,0.00965599,0.010127683,0.000765759,0.0070916396],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9257467,0.02633842,0.005346887,0.016621243,0.02397801,0.001968644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677402,0.007821751,0.004446192,0.0055485466,0.01328819,0.0011551096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042476747,0.002325052,0.0013739335,0.00248218,0.0017807633,0.0029740992,0.002182405,0.0031651258,0.0025906872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03648312,0.0016245447,0.0018493799,0.0020793255,0.0024971943,0.0010333704,0.0028278735,0.0016019295,0.002283029],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015449249,0.0014263958,0.072001554,0.0010738646,0.00077795243,0.00012959637,0.001709705,0.004116259,0.87865436,0.0011380975,0.002206491,0.035220735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052224525,0.014876278,0.15289447,0.0006890693,0.0015043129,0.0009815252,0.0009806199,0.021469368,0.7676234,0.0011949138,0.036919616,0.000344185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046007917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008792135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042476747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019481408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037752523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2246412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404146798","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70028","title":"Mapping Biodiversity Coast‐to‐Coast‐to‐Coast Across Canada's Three Oceans Using eDNA Metabarcoding","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Marine biodiversity; Fishery; Oceanography; Environmental DNA; Ecology; Geology; Biology","score_opus":0.021650347563009407,"score_gpt":0.2203057288234783,"score_spread":0.1986553812604689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404146798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94985175,0.0020761332,0.0058509144,0.0001960022,0.000028609204,0.00009795583,0.03557796,0.00021706372,0.0061036255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951603,0.0012791966,0.020360343,0.00024055665,0.000007263065,0.000110192006,0.023641692,0.000070671675,0.0026871937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994752,0.000021574488,0.000029728275,0.00019393036,0.00016940884,0.00011012001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988582,0.00009727278,0.00017404584,0.000046672525,0.00069821725,0.00012547856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042949556,0.0004567019,0.00039877737,0.0040101754,0.0019221389,0.0011189859,0.00059090636,0.00027363244,0.001183671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009123998,0.00022293504,0.0004976606,0.0061870553,0.0004406905,0.00019085976,0.000977206,0.00032120344,0.00019890415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024965493,0.000030526306,0.8812819,0.00060724205,0.0005357608,0.0003093547,0.0019602145,0.0019465409,0.043124866,0.000571833,0.0033925362,0.065989554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007309287,0.000015647172,0.98429155,0.000114532704,0.00011238248,0.00007669727,0.0010548485,0.00154455,0.003223364,0.000086024265,0.009449198,0.000023865852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88187146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95977694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11812854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053367973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009006684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23764837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405497520","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70015","title":"Evaluating Sampling Designs to Survey Fish Diversity in Lakes From Northern Temperate Zones","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Génome Québec","keywords":"Temperate climate; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Sampling (signal processing); Diversity (politics); Fishery; Geography; Ecology; Sampling design; Environmental science; Biology; Engineering; Population","score_opus":0.1031422426852203,"score_gpt":0.28722498453233664,"score_spread":0.18408274184711632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405497520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779157,0.0002704895,0.019832984,0.00004687662,0.000007872537,0.0012106894,0.00018322002,0.000057173103,0.00047497015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92198616,0.0001817096,0.07505812,0.00009279314,0.0000069713824,0.0018598253,0.0003850885,0.000010449337,0.00041897263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99315965,0.0047354205,0.0003709798,0.0005335597,0.000872778,0.00032757875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876001,0.0054727704,0.0024167811,0.0005906051,0.0034914291,0.00042830053],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01508041,0.00053723436,0.00035757603,0.0009896664,0.0008728353,0.0005146416,0.0007352508,0.00046129664,0.00052834564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014425937,0.00029158458,0.0004113333,0.00075299287,0.00073112216,0.0003977722,0.00066719746,0.00019270206,0.000106119885],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039414605,0.00090762286,0.7598133,0.00076578674,0.0005209445,0.00017580354,0.0025005206,0.027155776,0.107212946,0.00076314027,0.00071809965,0.09552463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003517213,0.0073391437,0.92337763,0.00013100354,0.00023087113,0.00009712962,0.0014561636,0.034005016,0.029542252,0.0004165429,0.0029660712,0.00008641301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09141716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24303506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9849196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003558146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028963855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18177009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405708555","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70049","title":"Rare Taxa Are Key Links in Regional Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles in Dusts Across Diverse North American Regions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Taxon; Key (lock); Geography; Antibiotic resistance; Resistance (ecology); Biology; Ecology; Microbiology; Antibiotics","score_opus":0.020968254648565318,"score_gpt":0.2680880031520362,"score_spread":0.24711974850347085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405708555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982755,0.00027954663,0.00022582678,0.00003567756,0.0000021200626,0.000008430514,0.0006245168,0.000005309022,0.00054306403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867094,0.00017502997,0.00038549674,0.000023510878,0.0000025398406,0.000007071981,0.00043337853,0.0000026777218,0.00029937885],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955064,0.00003980805,0.00002174163,0.0001970272,0.00009644041,0.00009443232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991959,0.0000997951,0.00021984182,0.000038903283,0.00032352767,0.00012209939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027960064,0.00018888227,0.00027594,0.0018473943,0.0012514199,0.0009878922,0.00037623185,0.0002484837,0.0011317617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087293424,0.00015456074,0.00017570354,0.0020415063,0.0006429756,0.00024194985,0.00062051695,0.0002597752,0.00009707939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007307671,0.000014639267,0.98446494,0.000033052263,0.000073702984,0.000053351403,0.001100454,0.000117070296,0.0059124804,0.00008227033,0.00021457701,0.007860396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.4879696e-7,0.0000043590417,0.9982712,0.0000070342007,0.00001032844,0.000025541909,0.0011196681,0.00010609345,0.00011807779,0.000021980359,0.00031252892,0.000002345797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7116014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8649378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7116014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019974483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018948944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5801941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405824325","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70054","title":"Taxonomic Blind Spots: A Limitation of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding‐Based Detection for Canadian Freshwater Fishes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Parks Canada; Ontario Genomics; Environment and Climate Change Canada; McMaster University; Genome Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biology; Zoology; Ecology; Fishery; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.017662027962462985,"score_gpt":0.1959997124692176,"score_spread":0.1783376845067546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405824325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8724369,0.0036959373,0.06212953,0.001541153,0.0001251591,0.0004664318,0.04329933,0.001716744,0.01458886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86810786,0.0016261288,0.09190108,0.0012142963,0.000023346314,0.0004317716,0.033191778,0.00044327634,0.0030603807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875196,0.0012960171,0.00072421756,0.0028278057,0.0064981407,0.0011341942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98149097,0.0043437267,0.002552441,0.0020611156,0.009084299,0.00046739003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009098685,0.00076158816,0.0009281509,0.0044288132,0.003988908,0.002590383,0.002359452,0.00073500985,0.0012530598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023622384,0.00052255945,0.0007640834,0.0070818854,0.0019746723,0.0010309161,0.0021386042,0.00068895204,0.0003594391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006030682,0.000058177724,0.6985984,0.0038036723,0.00075274217,0.00046241595,0.005643179,0.0058208196,0.08709038,0.0028228858,0.01679812,0.1775461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029088564,0.00012016859,0.8681916,0.00062578794,0.0005395015,0.0005348428,0.0033890211,0.010229063,0.04098545,0.0016071963,0.0735485,0.0001996847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69107723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8845852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30892277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008071797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013170265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62148416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406346015","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70029","title":"Estimating Rapid Diversity Changes During Acute Herbicide Contamination Using Environmental DNA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; York University; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Fonds de recherche du Québec; Groupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologie; Canada Foundation for Innovation; McGill University","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Contamination; Environmental science; Diversity (politics); Environmental chemistry; Biology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Chemistry","score_opus":0.010276573857602724,"score_gpt":0.206881956556814,"score_spread":0.19660538269921127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406346015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922247,0.00037187897,0.0058524613,0.000029330826,0.000007852687,0.00005171985,0.0008977296,0.000045231864,0.0005191825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98185366,0.0004346032,0.015747538,0.00009960683,0.000007860788,0.00014211066,0.0009916851,0.000016065751,0.00070680573],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995197,0.000066412395,0.00003591958,0.00018803884,0.00015019598,0.00003973297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993795,0.000085477935,0.00029917358,0.00004551078,0.00014528532,0.000045128283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033757673,0.0003575302,0.00029368207,0.0006245268,0.0003693681,0.00038496676,0.0002449506,0.0004200229,0.0004419273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006085127,0.00016503586,0.00020438508,0.000522614,0.00026368367,0.00031765623,0.0004553324,0.00036297104,0.00012750068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020307682,0.00004993303,0.10633519,0.00009210026,0.00006236749,0.00005071665,0.00015498219,0.00031632153,0.882222,0.00003271841,0.000039542567,0.010440965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008998254,0.0007352213,0.77013487,0.000030152985,0.000117937125,0.00026267025,0.0004273853,0.0025699143,0.22368348,0.00012937564,0.0018735694,0.000026365393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001573769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042471695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001573769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002664977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024506132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0031291842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406689079","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70045","title":"<scp>DNA</scp> Metabarcoding Improves the Taxonomic Resolution of Visually Determined Diet Composition of Beaked Redfish (<i>Sebastes</i> sp.)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Sebastes; Fishery; Composition (language); Biology; Zoology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Art","score_opus":0.00862366500909608,"score_gpt":0.2001592836476967,"score_spread":0.1915356186386006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406689079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99486995,0.0003245448,0.0038578215,0.000036366935,0.0000046584,0.000009581836,0.00024110118,0.00007217201,0.00058387406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98661405,0.00013794433,0.012243073,0.000045190078,0.0000057443535,0.0000082545075,0.00041878974,0.000017056125,0.00050998677],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996402,0.00007756287,0.000030421717,0.00014306803,0.000070472845,0.00003829387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911183,0.00017943064,0.00034705838,0.00007191981,0.00022734678,0.00006232718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059820333,0.00034279583,0.00019755181,0.001129217,0.0002683027,0.0006325994,0.00020681412,0.00029859744,0.0007457439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010739763,0.00018138177,0.00018763776,0.00049243413,0.00027754286,0.0002847736,0.00041129134,0.00020983508,0.00038676683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002852273,0.00003941923,0.2527912,0.0001462701,0.000080039405,0.00009466071,0.00028026442,0.00026892519,0.7077696,0.000047182333,0.00014839877,0.038048815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007554941,0.0002324656,0.8874253,0.000046002624,0.00009042758,0.00056538585,0.00042128356,0.0030725708,0.10667981,0.00004213884,0.0013986577,0.00001833119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058013108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01497416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058013108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016629737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020573418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011535108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407184115","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70059","title":"<scp>eDNA</scp> Sampling Systems for Salmon Ecosystem Monitoring","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nuu Chah Nulth Tribal Council; University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Pacific Salmon Foundation","keywords":"Ecosystem; Sampling (signal processing); Environmental science; Fishery; Environmental DNA; Ecology; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Biology; Biodiversity; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.017070653801565194,"score_gpt":0.22671207471393504,"score_spread":0.20964142091236984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407184115","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10954645,0.0011881142,0.6616818,0.004686628,0.00060046866,0.003743857,0.06482653,0.069041304,0.08468496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21934389,0.0009060941,0.68408763,0.0026157952,0.0003396455,0.00292171,0.044015583,0.0034736705,0.04229608],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885356,0.00024928112,0.00010699181,0.00022169197,0.00051179464,0.000056610512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99524516,0.00067448436,0.00069588743,0.0009409729,0.0021484357,0.00029511823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022524376,0.0004771511,0.00025906338,0.0011456754,0.000587552,0.0007087063,0.0012420813,0.00064442743,0.024451884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028410424,0.0003325469,0.00035146455,0.0012405331,0.00037438943,0.00086585147,0.0012643225,0.00058286445,0.00903355],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006447772,0.00018390085,0.03703389,0.0013161534,0.000103774444,0.00071135955,0.00041094018,0.0049562114,0.32147324,0.0027139324,0.17866875,0.45178303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019726767,0.0010827407,0.1332441,0.00067030365,0.00009930912,0.0013606253,0.00036033438,0.037246346,0.29865813,0.0030534582,0.52378875,0.00023857066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008616191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015147484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024451884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086972694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014793406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081799686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408093578","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70073","title":"A Framework to Unify the Relationship Between Numerical Abundance, Biomass, and Environmental <scp>DNA</scp>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Biomass (ecology); DNA; Environmental DNA; Computational biology; Environmental science; Ecology; Evolutionary biology; Biology; Genetics; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.0152069212110747,"score_gpt":0.23100345529177704,"score_spread":0.21579653408070235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408093578","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025399886,0.00074825104,0.96627444,0.0022026324,0.00010875091,0.00009056743,0.00069271505,0.00028952185,0.0041932752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58007246,0.0009937303,0.4127701,0.0009717669,0.00028510124,0.00050059496,0.0008306289,0.00018250133,0.0033930321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951023,0.0026976543,0.00027080317,0.0012161548,0.00052078743,0.00019234106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905075,0.0059238216,0.0014189276,0.00062217057,0.0012275662,0.00030001233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009728398,0.0015215817,0.0010171284,0.004324454,0.00087684894,0.003931017,0.002296799,0.0016871459,0.0025934994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02088636,0.0010577912,0.0019962918,0.0031118086,0.004077528,0.0036216544,0.00314558,0.0022557022,0.000737313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052418618,0.0001795861,0.03290777,0.0002808263,0.0006242072,0.00052683736,0.0012551569,0.2435963,0.0030473769,0.6448075,0.004208668,0.06851329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020683594,0.00008576644,0.013374663,0.00012127,0.0001176569,0.00016673529,0.00022041523,0.5662279,0.00045878277,0.4095589,0.009509841,0.00013739032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023469128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016234597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023469128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027424947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003068572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0514493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409089410","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70087","title":"Monitoring Atlantic Salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) Smolt Migration in a Large River System Using Environmental <scp>DNA</scp>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Salmo; Fishery; Environmental DNA; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Ecology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.008781146731458914,"score_gpt":0.20235588954878855,"score_spread":0.19357474281732964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409089410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959611,0.000042972326,0.0024852396,0.000030199477,0.0000037773166,0.000020131487,0.0009022371,0.0000765184,0.00047789328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959407,0.000030650353,0.0029523436,0.00002581799,0.0000020249865,0.000019193583,0.00069329084,0.0000057446314,0.0003302932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986625,0.000022698043,0.0000052361706,0.00005787454,0.000031310727,0.000016628046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970275,0.000040755276,0.000085621534,0.000013995738,0.0001217689,0.000035150806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003130853,0.00021573847,0.00016610957,0.00028020563,0.00034799994,0.0003035893,0.00027959986,0.00016754982,0.00054451317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003210069,0.00012124335,0.00016655412,0.00034955388,0.00015264355,0.00016595364,0.00021922686,0.0001838908,0.00013482117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009390409,0.00006055167,0.93657005,0.000046113804,0.00008607334,0.00004536058,0.00011314763,0.007967357,0.037784345,0.00003847298,0.00030111245,0.01689357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000141337105,0.00022817854,0.93920404,0.00001593413,0.00007098792,0.000034013698,0.00031384247,0.05256325,0.006341256,0.000054341916,0.0011380175,0.000021995225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19583334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4359812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19583334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011973059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085655175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3893869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409190820","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70092","title":"Development, Validation, and Implementation of <scp>eDNA</scp>‐Focused <scp>qPCR</scp> Assays to Detect and Distinguish Between Goldfish (<scp><i>Carassius auratus</i></scp>) and Prussian Carp (<scp><i>Carassius gibelio</i></scp>)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services; Government of Alberta; University of Alberta","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Alberta Innovates","keywords":"Carassius; Carassius auratus; Carp; Chemistry; Fishery; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.009184770927752245,"score_gpt":0.22658876942191314,"score_spread":0.2174039984941609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409190820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5313617,0.0012969803,0.4437457,0.00066017424,0.00025303903,0.004026788,0.0044412524,0.0039912616,0.010223028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5854568,0.0006301015,0.39153543,0.0009792654,0.000041185733,0.0019178516,0.0072484966,0.00050109776,0.011689815],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411845,0.00066935684,0.00031303416,0.0011931541,0.0032944246,0.0004116103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617237,0.00040400302,0.00043445415,0.00053026655,0.002235388,0.00022355467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006183474,0.0011516727,0.00054924015,0.0010579692,0.0009777276,0.001380669,0.0017090036,0.0010612842,0.0010059202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004064513,0.0006625095,0.0006295168,0.0005605849,0.0015539497,0.0005154332,0.0010292414,0.0010361366,0.00092971744],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007679352,0.00010245891,0.008927587,0.00016159343,0.000033843506,0.00005045982,0.00022967978,0.0020382733,0.9715244,0.00050749193,0.00056839647,0.015779069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033277145,0.000705044,0.026076727,0.00007876732,0.00009458427,0.00019017833,0.00022816833,0.01202948,0.94654316,0.00023846248,0.013729854,0.000052362677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045909896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092229225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045909896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025264444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073736003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09128529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409190872","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70089","title":"Combining <scp>eDNA</scp> Metabarcoding, Hydrology‐Based Modeling and Camera Trap Datasets to Assess the Potential of River <scp>eDNA</scp> in Monitoring Terrestrial Mammals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Ministry of Environment; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; European Commission","keywords":"Trap (plumbing); Environmental DNA; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Geology; Biology; Biodiversity; Environmental engineering; Geotechnical engineering","score_opus":0.022556802864741755,"score_gpt":0.24381849943724584,"score_spread":0.22126169657250408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409190872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98314154,0.00012800489,0.011851091,0.00021491891,0.000011635071,0.000038296545,0.0032532976,0.0004443013,0.00091699825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844381,0.0000553712,0.012332443,0.00004999176,0.000007578172,0.000021053467,0.002752866,0.00004623473,0.00029630086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994099,0.00020710066,0.000035627847,0.00018664524,0.00008659652,0.00007413812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981675,0.0007652145,0.00028505435,0.00027335898,0.00037239678,0.00013629661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025372875,0.00053173513,0.00041218885,0.0010815905,0.00063832,0.0012866049,0.0010576078,0.0005112557,0.0006678521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004098193,0.00038743456,0.00061131787,0.0013886986,0.00043492267,0.0007038698,0.00072579586,0.00042433006,0.00016799502],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012278378,0.00007244726,0.6919023,0.000109691,0.0007184725,0.00010866168,0.00016704008,0.28232235,0.0033063912,0.0003199282,0.0012176485,0.01963237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020884694,0.000033955046,0.25667554,0.00002008559,0.0001232663,0.000042796983,0.00019778674,0.7401769,0.0010392921,0.00030618795,0.0013260859,0.00003714325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47751617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6231556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47751617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032804797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022446325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94947344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410499731","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70121","title":"Improving the Understanding of Detections From <scp>iDNA</scp> Surveys in Malaysian Borneo With Multiscale Occupancy Models: A Case‐Study Using Leech Blood Meals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Leverhulme Trust; Queen Mary University of London","keywords":"Occupancy; Biology; Sampling (signal processing); Covariate; Ecology; Environmental DNA; Statistics; Invertebrate; Biodiversity; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.031163588151681538,"score_gpt":0.221864879023497,"score_spread":0.19070129087181545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410499731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904867,0.000091364745,0.008667309,0.00014114956,0.000004554999,0.000019869614,0.0002564299,0.000036554142,0.00029604466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955954,0.000028588795,0.0040203864,0.000017804849,0.000005115858,0.000010099978,0.00015970007,0.0000073412507,0.00015557556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985372,0.00079754804,0.00006465147,0.000348858,0.000074727504,0.00017700072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99081975,0.0070254607,0.0011597738,0.0004753567,0.00032802534,0.00019164813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052374504,0.00049564935,0.0004760435,0.0007866117,0.0003333369,0.001049589,0.0011819787,0.0007245633,0.001266588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006811879,0.00040531348,0.0011513957,0.0006272272,0.00073326146,0.0008040166,0.0008985227,0.00074454676,0.00014334527],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021199907,0.00024127026,0.7110839,0.00015365664,0.0004563642,0.0005704743,0.00073319324,0.26838806,0.0014382654,0.0022167552,0.00051026157,0.013995832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084017665,0.000113091395,0.13811795,0.000033541077,0.00007674254,0.00011782636,0.00069147313,0.8585682,0.0005263832,0.0012782773,0.00042899387,0.00003906236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060479492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053141233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060479492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015494735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008129981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120254934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411095492","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70100","title":"A Metadata Checklist and Data Formatting Guidelines to Make <scp>eDNA FAIR</scp> (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Victoria","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; European Commission","keywords":"Metadata; Disk formatting; Interoperability; Checklist; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Database; Biology","score_opus":0.03255661795179208,"score_gpt":0.28272250757985384,"score_spread":0.25016588962806174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411095492","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065657673,0.0012586475,0.7384669,0.02298193,0.00413645,0.03540703,0.098219685,0.035481732,0.057481874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008314863,0.0013859823,0.84324765,0.0052492945,0.00053803215,0.022704532,0.09861797,0.0047282507,0.015213483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9161376,0.025735425,0.032712758,0.0027196452,0.019854043,0.0028406084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.647785,0.098327525,0.02165264,0.055664536,0.16889365,0.0076766373],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13993412,0.0029702669,0.0022362522,0.03494448,0.0059193964,0.011742774,0.008760949,0.006044353,0.022484643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2284897,0.0035925219,0.0033212297,0.018997537,0.0051661967,0.015025456,0.014130748,0.007869235,0.026456365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030241726,0.00061839196,0.004956377,0.00572166,0.000088220615,0.0014900112,0.005238142,0.0035448973,0.011409852,0.09319719,0.6223664,0.25106642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078646925,0.00011205475,0.001969142,0.0044282586,0.000044219447,0.00038756029,0.0014236867,0.0017447551,0.004753907,0.01463178,0.9702084,0.0002174966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02592947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024256976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9912391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008725582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044173818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7400512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411240691","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70139","title":"Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> (<scp>eDNA</scp>) Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction‐Based Assays for Surveying 125 Taxa of Importance to North America","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre; University of Victoria; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Liber Ero Foundation; Canada Research Chairs; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Polymerase chain reaction; Biology; Genetics; Gene","score_opus":0.01343405584146363,"score_gpt":0.2278370646678604,"score_spread":0.2144030088263968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411240691","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26883978,0.007905881,0.46484974,0.004036935,0.0009153122,0.0055259205,0.07059503,0.010169402,0.16716199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25998047,0.0042817784,0.6240947,0.00319587,0.00013465295,0.0033175806,0.04136747,0.0011911866,0.062436327],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956065,0.00066999387,0.0002599629,0.00092157815,0.0022630868,0.00027896758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958264,0.0007195862,0.00064849015,0.00037059287,0.0021855466,0.0002492736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003318213,0.00092460087,0.0005457095,0.0023149035,0.0010631112,0.0018925439,0.001379371,0.000919166,0.010650234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002938906,0.00066124287,0.00064952334,0.0015007342,0.0014535665,0.00079982483,0.0012146599,0.0014056265,0.0031325656],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020899918,0.00016135257,0.018383311,0.000857971,0.000084343825,0.00013856064,0.00062271266,0.0016402758,0.8847103,0.0039135865,0.013681812,0.07559676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069918315,0.00080602296,0.09252753,0.00052654673,0.00025136504,0.00042449826,0.0012300942,0.009497,0.59809333,0.0017328986,0.2946951,0.00014563711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04112918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1912308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9588708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041307537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064125285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08177954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411705537","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70125","title":"Automating the Curation of <scp>DNA</scp> Barcode Databases for Vascular Plants","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Barcode; Database; Computer science; Data curation; World Wide Web; Operating system","score_opus":0.01395009620961197,"score_gpt":0.22464380499899753,"score_spread":0.21069370878938556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411705537","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04649151,0.0011023777,0.89492863,0.00078925095,0.00026349607,0.0011277618,0.013611197,0.03838077,0.0033051418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05571098,0.000529668,0.9185714,0.00037864424,0.00007902472,0.00063146837,0.018023437,0.0037244044,0.0023510107],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951734,0.001021333,0.0005864703,0.0013548089,0.0015559766,0.00030793753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826968,0.005780202,0.0025165058,0.004147852,0.004198352,0.0006603237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008250222,0.0010420955,0.0010153513,0.0060444325,0.0016495923,0.0036180858,0.001990831,0.0010061048,0.0040513547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022030897,0.0008367917,0.0012471231,0.0034206393,0.00083248393,0.0018569804,0.003256194,0.0018753516,0.006861191],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049272185,0.00024638762,0.014868274,0.0023950853,0.00024861007,0.0010066961,0.0032692319,0.0037277413,0.41681916,0.0062589115,0.04100534,0.5096619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079008125,0.00025137074,0.0430806,0.0009819999,0.00021633462,0.0019806,0.0014697515,0.04883015,0.58456916,0.011909575,0.30630276,0.0003286767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047326344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069635445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008250222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010727297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039488617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04363185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412047390","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70106","title":"Navigating the Murky Waters: Variation in Low Abundance Sequence Filtration in Fish <scp>eDNA</scp> Metabarcoding","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Sequence (biology); Biology; Zoology; Genetics","score_opus":0.011160386732921163,"score_gpt":0.22426879500465577,"score_spread":0.2131084082717346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412047390","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36747307,0.42398605,0.17060338,0.007836833,0.0010997569,0.00056029967,0.005041377,0.00077568,0.02262355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71324,0.119240545,0.1537641,0.005262014,0.00029666623,0.00062900863,0.0037147116,0.00044269668,0.0034101605],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873826,0.005051889,0.0020534422,0.0021106838,0.003115063,0.00028628678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726935,0.015943378,0.004896143,0.0011765629,0.005117982,0.00017242116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018399714,0.00046175177,0.0009288122,0.0028310379,0.0007038802,0.0028466322,0.0014558884,0.00085501425,0.0011836974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032308154,0.00033232596,0.0010600095,0.0030732492,0.0016779333,0.0020857786,0.0013913938,0.0008238876,0.00044335454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035842933,0.00004297947,0.14646651,0.02927744,0.0018495065,0.000923666,0.0052260095,0.002478092,0.03026074,0.0047740126,0.0065667164,0.7717759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067564266,0.0009385618,0.47292146,0.037225902,0.0063141724,0.0055198385,0.010081502,0.0052663735,0.07726464,0.01620642,0.3676128,0.0005808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074650827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017775519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018399714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087286433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002033728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09730816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412425774","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70134","title":"Winds of Change: Charting a Pathway to Ecosystem Monitoring Using Airborne Environmental DNA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Environmental change; Environmental monitoring; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Climate change; Ecology; Biodiversity; Biology; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.02950081881988259,"score_gpt":0.23109551435935052,"score_spread":0.20159469553946793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412425774","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019299794,0.030973142,0.18635206,0.6408513,0.013072816,0.0041951644,0.0046269074,0.0042082593,0.0964205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1598374,0.045066264,0.7057671,0.054399636,0.0021292337,0.0040353,0.005708568,0.00088322896,0.022173269],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98465997,0.007584067,0.0013106618,0.0012544587,0.0037971395,0.0013936801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720863,0.006594158,0.0020763532,0.002081038,0.012425852,0.0047363094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02690228,0.0015845544,0.0011641568,0.0050282804,0.0057833437,0.014781727,0.0050274166,0.007351225,0.013878233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033084348,0.00086282194,0.0017426892,0.00347565,0.004493354,0.015818702,0.015426268,0.014739939,0.00502986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024414732,0.0005048922,0.026945775,0.0029930694,0.00016650162,0.0011023642,0.010901366,0.0033034722,0.0031941344,0.053043433,0.28148872,0.61611205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006440941,0.00050875935,0.012194688,0.0059505696,0.00011511659,0.0003865354,0.024294008,0.003970286,0.0018780445,0.079217315,0.8711878,0.00023246251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03396271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056968085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03396271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065912334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03853406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1422745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412426875","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70149","title":"Inferring Plant Community Phenology via Bee‐Collected Pollen","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Phenology; Pollen; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.02301643454860745,"score_gpt":0.18338471701998033,"score_spread":0.16036828247137289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412426875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98847955,0.0003154082,0.0059459945,0.000032880835,0.000004822802,0.000027733813,0.0041672373,0.00010538004,0.00092095643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98517126,0.00014082521,0.012160234,0.000033251094,0.0000038816656,0.00001969031,0.002031808,0.000015776166,0.00042342008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984527,0.00003007495,0.000007638218,0.000058149835,0.000039706054,0.000019210998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992354,0.00017926075,0.00023400018,0.00005035589,0.00021594495,0.00008506789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030060575,0.00022221732,0.00019665291,0.0015667024,0.0003620533,0.00046347885,0.00028270629,0.00024167342,0.00069073105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009115808,0.00013425798,0.0001574172,0.0011310002,0.00014257806,0.00019271346,0.0002529038,0.00015896071,0.00022881759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013700787,0.000032462343,0.7539378,0.00013508793,0.0001184825,0.00010164321,0.00053410634,0.0014409311,0.22560449,0.00008816946,0.00037017078,0.017499631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002421944,0.000035059355,0.98804307,0.000010672959,0.000024708916,0.000103540675,0.00023169782,0.003666658,0.0069213537,0.000040270646,0.00091458234,0.0000060452394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063497856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17220886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063497856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066597457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041134958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12625647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412427136","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70158","title":"Impact of <scp>CO<sub>2</sub></scp>‐Induced Aquatic Acidification on Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> and <scp>RNA</scp> Shedding and Persistence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Hakai Institute; Liber Ero Foundation; Genome Canada; Tula Foundation; Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada; Genome British Columbia","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); RNA; DNA; Chemistry; Biology; Cell biology; Gene; Genetics","score_opus":0.013431882633938415,"score_gpt":0.22206406036338439,"score_spread":0.20863217772944598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412427136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99832684,0.00016427116,0.00041667913,0.000042122552,0.000014912258,0.000010644613,0.0004599745,0.000022167365,0.00054245035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855846,0.00009405148,0.0003110314,0.0000602007,0.0000028698296,0.00001768797,0.00025504184,0.00000857641,0.00069214666],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990857,0.000009720115,0.000007082312,0.000027676855,0.000023738403,0.000023245737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998211,0.000032107346,0.00005509443,0.000016242777,0.000029742763,0.000045667482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012315066,0.00023832823,0.00025584977,0.00011235371,0.00018210424,0.00038371113,0.00016508733,0.00023753018,0.0009987092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015846628,0.00012007005,0.00018076299,0.00011873021,0.00024096959,0.0001879445,0.0002875526,0.0004108936,0.00010925315],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002888125,0.00002423364,0.006561987,0.000048751754,0.000016231137,0.000066166,0.000019144134,0.00023765839,0.9915944,0.00002132237,0.0000569681,0.0010644489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014404794,0.0007780658,0.31121936,0.000012595059,0.000052323496,0.0001374475,0.00026171005,0.0038007877,0.68212396,0.00009397881,0.001485192,0.000020302605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043185367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006435626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043185367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039242278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024074408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008586824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412427140","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70152","title":"Assessment of Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> Survey Design for the Detection of Freshwater Unionid Mussels","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biology; Fishery; Zoology; Ecology; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.016158748451785148,"score_gpt":0.22503535035312192,"score_spread":0.20887660190133678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412427140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8985131,0.00011472061,0.09615639,0.00024025649,0.000022443122,0.0019249207,0.0003644178,0.00017867597,0.0024850483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9194587,0.000037755308,0.07801026,0.00012714558,0.000005520482,0.0017674003,0.00016606062,0.000018504556,0.0004086823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.88396734,0.099592485,0.004396016,0.0033492502,0.0076359217,0.0010589559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8372932,0.11103404,0.025715915,0.006709712,0.017514383,0.001732666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0783007,0.0005102993,0.00033665518,0.000983055,0.0005852353,0.00096129486,0.0009747745,0.0007550256,0.0009974426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12370927,0.00046104254,0.0006488232,0.0008242437,0.0008088917,0.0010032428,0.0013660098,0.000385926,0.00027176697],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045609134,0.00091453013,0.8198746,0.0004554278,0.00055926444,0.00010835799,0.0017535598,0.016702894,0.015572875,0.0012876233,0.00081846,0.13739155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003190457,0.02395033,0.86786735,0.00022701536,0.00038798267,0.0003116849,0.0016642999,0.06997508,0.028736059,0.0009943303,0.005445893,0.00012083791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032234676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007933297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0783007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015836625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002358037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41409862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412591959","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70147","title":"Persisting at the Edge of Ecological Collapse: The Impact of Urbanization on Fish and Amphibian Communities From Lake Xochimilco","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council","keywords":"Amphibian; Urbanization; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Geography; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.009496316168259555,"score_gpt":0.21070422622034193,"score_spread":0.20120791005208238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412591959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99977666,0.000012645791,0.000012425752,0.000016403555,5.5505643e-7,0.0000020499235,0.00005644429,8.866706e-7,0.00012195002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965286,0.000022765249,0.000048198443,0.000016689519,0.0000024029316,0.000007634921,0.00014177611,9.79768e-7,0.00010677314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988866,0.000021081161,0.000006812871,0.000027689426,0.000017282742,0.000038430167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975294,0.000024495133,0.0000967601,0.00001048509,0.00005134956,0.00006397526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017809562,0.0001939278,0.00022128955,0.0008477071,0.0009915078,0.00051925116,0.00020434396,0.00026954725,0.0011309426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003546126,0.00011825273,0.00017374646,0.0006717918,0.0005385515,0.00031272284,0.0008469788,0.00028015327,0.00007592423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064934386,0.000025324436,0.99191564,0.000023772165,0.000018920118,0.00026691047,0.0014259192,0.00005222074,0.0040257126,0.000017765959,0.00009453503,0.002068267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010057881,0.000014130564,0.9985049,0.000003777402,0.0000059156023,0.000035862584,0.0012046908,0.00006938373,0.00006476916,0.0000045976703,0.00008952433,0.0000015246721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048710085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11221517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048710085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007011256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004849748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09685314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412766331","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70150","title":"Innovative Airborne DNA Approach for Monitoring Honey Bee Foraging and Health","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Insect and Pesticide Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Beef Farmers of Ontario; Laurentian University; York University","funders":"Government of Canada; Ontario Genomics; Genome Canada","keywords":"Foraging; Honey bee; Biology; Environmental science; Zoology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03627993612989784,"score_gpt":0.2828141186056197,"score_spread":0.2465341824757219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412766331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92265177,0.0030750844,0.06671431,0.0002433758,0.00011745562,0.00026854136,0.004309079,0.00029927542,0.002321086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8429692,0.00161964,0.14924532,0.00036311618,0.00008707834,0.000349776,0.002468521,0.000049047663,0.0028482594],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999368,0.00014323776,0.000028092736,0.00025583862,0.00016135372,0.000043475167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995048,0.000107676344,0.00015442057,0.000044896795,0.00014471897,0.000043375177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003445149,0.00048082284,0.00035628403,0.0013476145,0.000268315,0.00058388815,0.00036273146,0.00068932015,0.0010173363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000555914,0.00025472042,0.00035335793,0.0008206751,0.0001933007,0.00028735228,0.00045188854,0.0005031557,0.0004917919],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024613127,0.00016464588,0.09509575,0.00028208035,0.000109347246,0.00013280081,0.00033639788,0.0007319832,0.8496416,0.00015957477,0.00036361816,0.052736063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005058163,0.0031201905,0.6044519,0.00023206453,0.0004792932,0.0022386056,0.0016577244,0.027264986,0.34742412,0.0013774207,0.011563694,0.00013953136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012885648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003155419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013476145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015779125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020964109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003403306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412774451","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70136","title":"Using <scp>eDNA</scp> to Assess Freshwater Bacterial Diversity Along a Forest–Non‐Forest Gradient in the Afrotropics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Ecology; Geography; Biology; Sociology","score_opus":0.026191341225673414,"score_gpt":0.22695235218725007,"score_spread":0.20076101096157667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412774451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818588,0.00033049975,0.011917989,0.00009999949,0.0000283921,0.00010325877,0.003491792,0.00012742938,0.0020417415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96646905,0.00017131862,0.029825311,0.00024725255,0.000012282282,0.00023178436,0.0018075786,0.000056419398,0.001178958],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999561,0.000087982065,0.000028539689,0.0001641087,0.00008194146,0.00007628794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940705,0.00012029583,0.00020403264,0.00004351868,0.00017025549,0.000054809057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058035523,0.00045176325,0.00029653104,0.0010966815,0.00066045154,0.0006305273,0.00038369413,0.00052598957,0.0015663778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078728964,0.00021199448,0.00028699907,0.0009889789,0.0006084951,0.00043898678,0.00062160136,0.00049681246,0.00059027394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005254454,0.00014731406,0.45435733,0.0003915854,0.000115632545,0.00038208358,0.0016642333,0.001701663,0.49758995,0.0004070924,0.0008406974,0.04187706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013638728,0.0005555057,0.90516466,0.00013509154,0.00007739049,0.00061795267,0.001959557,0.006270253,0.07547761,0.0005609266,0.009108016,0.000059422964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036100207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010047791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036100207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029610557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024161651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0071780086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412852738","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70169","title":"Sedimentary <scp>DNA</scp> Metabarcoding and Indigenous Knowledge Reconstruct Natural and Anthropogenic Disturbances to a Freshwater Lake in the Oil Sands Region of Alberta, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Prairie Bible Institute; University of Calgary; University of Victoria","funders":"Liber Ero Foundation; Alliance de recherche numérique du Canada; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Oil sands; Natural (archaeology); Indigenous; Ancient DNA; Sedimentary rock; Environmental science; Geology; Ecology; Geochemistry; Geography; Archaeology; Paleontology; Biology","score_opus":0.005311374339199508,"score_gpt":0.18843042307142693,"score_spread":0.18311904873222742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412852738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996382,0.00033293688,0.00034888176,0.000088223365,0.0000025993024,0.000013762537,0.0009182028,0.000017006398,0.0018962556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958825,0.0002257965,0.00122397,0.000040693496,0.0000023208345,0.0000063037633,0.0008177351,0.000005057744,0.0017955748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997991,0.000013359809,0.000009415949,0.000038707985,0.00007350376,0.00006586787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994593,0.0000380499,0.00011622202,0.000015230058,0.00029726687,0.00007402049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025245713,0.00018980118,0.000117220305,0.002319474,0.0013418582,0.0008603574,0.00041174292,0.00017860852,0.001064839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056441856,0.000112827816,0.000115802235,0.002954534,0.000577585,0.00017491652,0.00046320856,0.00016456051,0.00012195507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008676429,0.000020789259,0.95040184,0.00007996349,0.00003785213,0.00041875022,0.0031800333,0.0007161267,0.010104091,0.00024979073,0.0008182554,0.033885766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010270579,0.0000071589675,0.99501085,0.00001486386,0.000010286729,0.000048293386,0.0020825015,0.00049125036,0.00042409578,0.000031764197,0.0018735777,0.0000042189918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95161974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98757195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048380256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00780778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006161308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09733027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413265033","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70173","title":"Sexing From Seawater: Application of Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> Beyond Species Detection for Cetaceans","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Raincoast Conservation Foundation","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Administration portuaire Vancouver-Fraser","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biology; Sexing; Humpback whale; Whale; Fishery; Balaenoptera; Biodiversity; Population; Zoology; Ecology","score_opus":0.005342395872831704,"score_gpt":0.18218590805488494,"score_spread":0.17684351218205324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413265033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81697685,0.0068861647,0.15928504,0.0011043985,0.00022600018,0.00047602432,0.003168657,0.0014530533,0.010423677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8672661,0.0017295072,0.12574661,0.0006471115,0.00005004051,0.0002460683,0.0012943853,0.00010374163,0.0029164846],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911493,0.00020635276,0.000076525335,0.00031530255,0.00022594124,0.00006091446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988232,0.00039604254,0.00023016536,0.00014685963,0.0003170683,0.000086588865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012671677,0.0005043157,0.00028421078,0.00095530675,0.00041337562,0.00066541217,0.0004779862,0.00072836515,0.002159585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024511886,0.00025618027,0.0002578655,0.00040047054,0.00053257967,0.00048886496,0.00077109993,0.00054633006,0.0007347808],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011009284,0.0000341341,0.048382405,0.00045486446,0.00003417618,0.00016592258,0.00021556241,0.00046458712,0.8449078,0.00026231632,0.00035338028,0.10461481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016857044,0.0007501274,0.19907783,0.00026727174,0.00011873975,0.0014592564,0.00068117713,0.008852859,0.7733106,0.0011088349,0.014308673,0.00004773223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011853555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002996146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002159585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002275685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033056593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00722456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413526498","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70170","title":"A State‐Of‐The‐Art Review of Aquatic eDNA Sampling Technologies and Instrumentation: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Prospects","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Dartmouth General Hospital; Dalhousie University; Ocean Networks Canada Society","funders":"Office of Naval Research; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration","keywords":"Instrumentation (computer programming); Sampling (signal processing); State (computer science); Systems engineering; Engineering; Environmental science; Data science; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.010097635148427193,"score_gpt":0.21640479281999672,"score_spread":0.20630715767156954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413526498","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006810736,0.994831,0.002016647,0.00057465746,0.0003882026,0.000014672523,0.00006910926,0.00003371751,0.0013908589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018915702,0.9950481,0.0018380707,0.00033091172,0.00026487283,0.00001629656,0.00010804398,0.000008347045,0.000493865],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897015,0.00016307992,0.00019627307,0.00021539694,0.00038787836,0.000067214816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632204,0.0023366879,0.00040383372,0.000097595235,0.00073945266,0.00010040518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027590822,0.00093390705,0.0012023739,0.0036951206,0.00048692126,0.0020302546,0.0012262056,0.0012523725,0.0031648776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032694284,0.00053077453,0.00087364775,0.004050716,0.0007535488,0.0027897325,0.0009248314,0.0012438678,0.0016428338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006419871,0.00007564046,0.0009811219,0.036433168,0.00010591444,0.000165978,0.00018389565,0.00060469593,0.0068451436,0.0030146562,0.014419312,0.93710625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053849326,0.00019394653,0.0024997157,0.009586201,0.00024952437,0.0009777057,0.00024197996,0.00043227497,0.0046183397,0.0019471203,0.97918254,0.00006517985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012059347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016293002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036951206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060384977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001998381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014591634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413886940","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70119","title":"Ecological Function and Diversity of the Endosphere Microbiome in Leaves and Fruits of <i>Coffea arabica</i> L. Across Elevation and Shade Gradients","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; University of Oregon","keywords":"Biology; Microbiome; Ecological niche; Context (archaeology); Phyllosphere; Ecology; Coffea arabica; Botany; Habitat","score_opus":0.005374888579268419,"score_gpt":0.16905088280360367,"score_spread":0.16367599422433526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413886940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993173,0.00012898572,0.000075540105,0.000016447215,0.0000012095993,0.0000040916116,0.00029504998,0.0000043417626,0.00015706762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99898833,0.000059102746,0.00028378898,0.000028405038,0.0000016630845,0.0000075243465,0.00037889698,0.0000040263026,0.00024815524],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999018,0.000012390065,0.000004523287,0.00004605725,0.000011010603,0.000024330418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99985635,0.000016635053,0.000047709134,0.00000795939,0.000029591285,0.000041782405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010333963,0.0003056495,0.0002760755,0.00072134106,0.0006611547,0.00057072955,0.00014131173,0.00027298855,0.00094784977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015997568,0.00012707466,0.00022187288,0.0005139876,0.00039447652,0.00031342453,0.0005092215,0.0003115688,0.00013661233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004939128,0.00006176669,0.24055377,0.00022426283,0.000091526104,0.00023682334,0.0032529954,0.00018637716,0.7459601,0.000078432146,0.00014629275,0.008713703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002103656,0.00005763606,0.99593323,0.000009224267,0.00001628886,0.000075701944,0.0011073935,0.00017073419,0.0021504185,0.000015456522,0.0004543557,0.000007523036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012912739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024917698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012912739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038364896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018092248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025675178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413986812","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70145","title":"Combining Hydroacoustics and <scp>eDNA</scp> to Estimate Species‐Specific Biomass in a Pelagic Fish Community","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Pelagic zone; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Fishery; Biomass (ecology); Seascape; Biology; Zoology; Ecology; Habitat","score_opus":0.013289824709713937,"score_gpt":0.22160498152788957,"score_spread":0.20831515681817564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413986812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804041,0.00018519154,0.017246325,0.000019442019,0.000007174953,0.000053409578,0.0005202855,0.00010895698,0.0014551905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645403,0.00009786602,0.034175497,0.000039081668,0.000006597988,0.0000845616,0.00031389485,0.0000130466115,0.00072918384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964166,0.00008301422,0.00002652755,0.00013650273,0.00008950308,0.000022742426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930346,0.00018979509,0.00016559908,0.00005158169,0.00020351034,0.000086044005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073256233,0.0004252371,0.00021885635,0.001836678,0.0002737253,0.00043951249,0.00032627836,0.00030604168,0.0014571497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008493873,0.00022153993,0.00015176406,0.0009471867,0.00034207536,0.0007733853,0.0008824302,0.00022989171,0.00050213706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002491715,0.00011671108,0.51845884,0.00016475689,0.00014736888,0.0001032382,0.00039702567,0.0014113843,0.39296448,0.000107420485,0.00017722217,0.08570233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009807113,0.00041372897,0.9492596,0.000029595012,0.000090021706,0.00024934375,0.0004896774,0.010650411,0.0374811,0.00025501804,0.001034984,0.000036697726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016792262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006250822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001836678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018954222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015628696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0048746467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414135801","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70179","title":"Tracking Aquatic Biodiversity With Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> : A Study in Quebec's Mining Region","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Genome British Columbia; Génome Québec; Genome Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Habitat; Aquatic ecosystem; Ecosystem; Abundance (ecology); Water quality; Environmental monitoring; Disturbance (geology)","score_opus":0.011587544561810312,"score_gpt":0.1939047867040166,"score_spread":0.1823172421422063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414135801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979036,0.000092580565,0.00023888536,0.00008323153,0.0000027059652,0.00006598368,0.0004764964,0.0000056992994,0.0011307279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969733,0.00008928512,0.00049636984,0.000112640715,0.0000021987407,0.00004406768,0.00025816244,0.0000034740378,0.0020204508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966586,0.000045840494,0.000008579293,0.00008124296,0.00008471052,0.000113746886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898595,0.000108011474,0.0001719068,0.000032541935,0.00047564995,0.00022585069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044973538,0.00029763847,0.00022085449,0.000943071,0.0025028249,0.0007515301,0.00077704934,0.0005132009,0.0020055014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064579386,0.00018535365,0.00018967582,0.0015885411,0.0009469177,0.00029156014,0.0004397071,0.0003794882,0.00023104755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013484787,0.0001834293,0.9727209,0.000080373036,0.000048075435,0.0007704165,0.004766432,0.00018948784,0.007141965,0.00010673715,0.00079354557,0.013063817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051328825,0.00008500624,0.99530834,0.00001575114,0.000008299468,0.000106124746,0.003056282,0.0002211591,0.0002745797,0.000010017277,0.0009021184,0.0000072600046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9674727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032527328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010454469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005943083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07585287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414879948","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70270","title":"Capture Probe, Metabarcoding, or Shotgun Sequencing: Which Best Reflects Local Vegetation?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Tula Foundation; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Norges Forskningsråd; European Commission","keywords":"Shotgun; Shotgun sequencing; False positive paradox; Replicate; Taxon; Vegetation (pathology); Abundance (ecology)","score_opus":0.017722909912405282,"score_gpt":0.24008741935062963,"score_spread":0.22236450943822436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414879948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90079504,0.008986922,0.08575706,0.0007323225,0.00010149451,0.0001058531,0.000980084,0.0006296126,0.0019116086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9125527,0.0023251732,0.08267334,0.0005681765,0.000051455034,0.00006711443,0.0008526399,0.00016336195,0.0007459823],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712414,0.00096347736,0.00024650383,0.00089383574,0.0005012657,0.00027076836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962846,0.0021034966,0.0006947016,0.00019571147,0.00058186817,0.00013964156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041575665,0.0009946381,0.002101333,0.0025116128,0.00044675037,0.002008271,0.00072664197,0.0014711777,0.0007991624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007562625,0.000465286,0.00059832877,0.0023344972,0.000759317,0.0014731137,0.0006032231,0.00068260886,0.0007538555],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008106277,0.00020688686,0.35886312,0.0021546676,0.0010383552,0.00037187536,0.000865426,0.0024041927,0.5159654,0.00038709393,0.0012961616,0.11563622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004415129,0.0013587674,0.74940765,0.0008313428,0.0010981964,0.0017097476,0.0024357422,0.031986836,0.2017776,0.002492111,0.0066006603,0.0002570856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020673925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006901321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041575665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035482668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029587361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021987617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416619086","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70223","title":"Congruence of Fish Community Diversity and Composition Estimates Using Water and Sediment (Benthic Surface and Trapped Suspended Solids) Based Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> in a Recently Restored Creek","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Royal Ontario Museum; Ontario Genomics; University of Guelph; Genome Canada","keywords":"Electrofishing; Species richness; Environmental DNA; Sampling (signal processing); Species diversity; Benthic zone; Sediment; Community structure; Water quality","score_opus":0.017446296966666164,"score_gpt":0.2167584551078622,"score_spread":0.19931215814119604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416619086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996257,0.000012383999,0.000075254975,0.0000047355225,6.062208e-7,0.000006051236,0.00012159937,0.000004592987,0.00014909654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992211,0.000009350158,0.00034218407,0.000007571591,5.750911e-7,0.0000059336485,0.00017085421,0.0000021756098,0.00024020637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999228,0.00005558279,0.00004701975,0.00031924344,0.00022206693,0.00012811339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989814,0.00010665554,0.00022836331,0.000044600576,0.0003983289,0.00024054597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038379437,0.00020580951,0.00035316462,0.0014190362,0.0014305871,0.0009850384,0.00060352474,0.000346529,0.00062076066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080101157,0.0002477754,0.00020578146,0.0009892521,0.00076035317,0.00025703217,0.0006087135,0.0002456806,0.00012269529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001564732,0.000035090805,0.9580408,0.000026833612,0.000039628925,0.00032571066,0.0022027506,0.00016068139,0.035277713,0.000025810556,0.00009023764,0.0036182979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014252103,0.000037501242,0.9986829,0.0000019049098,0.000005523943,0.000046644447,0.0007104043,0.00012665027,0.0002944252,0.0000035566009,0.00008578016,0.0000033171912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41499165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7923539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41499165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038111578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014567086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8251523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7081916165","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70104","title":"Field Test of the Self‐Preserving <scp>eDNA</scp> Filter and the Importance of Calibration When Changing Methods During Long‐Term Monitoring","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Calibration; Filter (signal processing); Field (mathematics); Test (biology)","score_opus":0.008475709578737336,"score_gpt":0.2264217688131738,"score_spread":0.21794605923443647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7081916165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669444,0.0002208874,0.031071838,0.0001311177,0.00006285626,0.00040032653,0.0003093814,0.00019294588,0.0006662409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90481913,0.00030236228,0.09026359,0.00040302728,0.00003356958,0.0007103655,0.0007728083,0.00012697621,0.0025681807],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961612,0.0010024896,0.0003017156,0.0009340996,0.0014434281,0.00015698139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943342,0.0015969425,0.0009811156,0.0006424199,0.0023088916,0.00013643033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042709773,0.0004450137,0.00026658105,0.000318468,0.00052687695,0.00051712035,0.0010015048,0.0009573614,0.00080891023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052447915,0.00028104254,0.00036964405,0.0004030706,0.0006404375,0.00067761773,0.0005639306,0.00053869345,0.00032554602],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047972894,0.00033919996,0.014706175,0.00016628005,0.000071735005,0.000042527172,0.0001951273,0.0009889943,0.96947306,0.00006511682,0.00020904797,0.013262931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003039407,0.0054801395,0.04174575,0.000029443834,0.0001223653,0.00017712238,0.00019933956,0.0051648347,0.944769,0.00005048035,0.0021988812,0.00003230875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006942612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010340906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006942612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007394359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005382195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0225873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083328939","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70182","title":"<scp>eDNA</scp> Metabarcoding to Monitor Fish Communities in a Large River Floodplain","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des Laurentides; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation","keywords":"Floodplain; Biodiversity; Environmental DNA; Wetland; Habitat; Ecosystem; Species richness; Ecosystem diversity; Electrofishing","score_opus":0.0114075381042345,"score_gpt":0.20442954626253076,"score_spread":0.19302200815829626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083328939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98349047,0.0002512422,0.01007607,0.00011390487,0.000010831394,0.000070224436,0.0026810442,0.00028169501,0.0030245367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964057,0.00016932639,0.031468946,0.00020979164,0.000010600595,0.0000875964,0.00153161,0.000037287416,0.0024277286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998142,0.000031698462,0.000010575332,0.00006340893,0.00006256079,0.000017499711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994466,0.000109701985,0.00020497102,0.000042730037,0.00015391463,0.000042179974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040653025,0.00023700827,0.00013714065,0.00096202636,0.0002905747,0.0003422091,0.00024311739,0.00018316685,0.0011179646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048236188,0.000091612994,0.0001222346,0.00061064353,0.00025004012,0.00018223711,0.000436727,0.00013427551,0.0002814131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000221561,0.00006131036,0.5712581,0.00020296068,0.00011842544,0.00019318315,0.00045141447,0.0015046282,0.3613457,0.00029861313,0.0014933789,0.06285068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011141481,0.00019394181,0.9246084,0.00003643767,0.00006140673,0.00030813605,0.00047355925,0.008048841,0.060346324,0.00017632401,0.0057067643,0.000028767916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011978856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056453433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011978856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030797053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033563367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023818254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7092308661","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70212","title":"Comparison of <scp>DNA</scp> Extraction Methods for Detecting the Sea Otter ( <scp> <i>Enhydra lutris</i> </scp> ) in Marine Sediments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"Hakai Institute; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Genome Canada; Mitacs; Genome British Columbia","keywords":"Otter; Seawater; Sediment; Extraction (chemistry); DNA extraction; Environmental DNA; DNA","score_opus":0.01784828465734538,"score_gpt":0.3018022971321825,"score_spread":0.2839540124748371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7092308661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530761,0.001384238,0.042696074,0.00015104558,0.00005222739,0.00021522967,0.00083822507,0.00024728762,0.0013395214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.841652,0.0023449901,0.14960611,0.00029900577,0.000034655746,0.0004073758,0.003085246,0.00011861442,0.0024520634],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799323,0.00047259766,0.00031526104,0.0004771172,0.0005820562,0.0001598359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981623,0.00062364136,0.00037297152,0.0001407806,0.0005947409,0.000105650375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018340434,0.00072607154,0.00026761927,0.0010762233,0.00028989956,0.0006378554,0.00051468844,0.0004378281,0.0004441483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033335993,0.00037403678,0.0004873191,0.00043201825,0.0007235404,0.00033600937,0.0004619849,0.0003905765,0.0002947171],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067972214,0.000026564972,0.008127479,0.00020433472,0.00004001895,0.00003072933,0.00014392161,0.00030868102,0.98551786,0.000047203608,0.000048791502,0.0054364037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007780171,0.00064519723,0.054918714,0.000055386896,0.00014421024,0.00025867546,0.00018799937,0.0027088306,0.9389053,0.000042535954,0.0020962446,0.000029112563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025837265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009415307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025837265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040670665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053968944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009699523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}