{"meta":{"query_hash":"90c593726a68","filters":{"venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/90c593726a68","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Environmental+Economics+and+Policy+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W2004845068","doi":"10.1007/bf03353979","title":"Macro-entrepreneurship and sustainable development: the need for innovative solutions for promoting win-win interactions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"New York Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Macro; Entrepreneurship; Macro level; Sustainability; Sustainable development; Economics; Management science; Economic system; Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.02734939399948414,"score_gpt":0.25896050286703404,"score_spread":0.2316111088675499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004845068","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12032315,0.050192006,0.013075741,0.54558396,0.0020643747,0.000065665154,0.00009845688,0.00007370733,0.2685229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96159446,0.020733615,0.001896154,0.006651793,0.0009107539,0.00005348047,0.00002203416,0.000023632578,0.008114002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976597,0.0013506586,0.000048589405,0.0001795657,0.00037931182,0.0003821718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98873365,0.0076203183,0.00073569233,0.00039532877,0.00067264755,0.0018423004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053046593,0.00031235634,0.00044080016,0.0011168438,0.0023453871,0.0115826735,0.00063873926,0.0028824992,0.010172029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009147856,0.00020780937,0.00020980166,0.0017221819,0.011782333,0.010519801,0.0043511856,0.0033896738,0.00062421174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041470677,0.00012423507,0.004951009,0.0002473095,0.000022567954,0.0001261371,0.0033187459,0.0005960284,0.00017352705,0.9164017,0.013213863,0.06078336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014022002,0.00003191842,0.0053260643,0.0003072269,0.000010563145,0.00009663738,0.0127484,0.0007192217,0.00017431278,0.8845799,0.09597205,0.000019774568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018233168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044844532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0115826735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023307942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067611546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034028888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009887758","doi":"10.1007/s10018-012-0048-0","title":"Fishing games under climate variability: transboundary management of Pacific sardine in the California Current System","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sardine; Fishing; Stock (firearms); Fishery; Climate change; Fisheries management; Fish stock; Stock assessment; Environmental science; Geography; Oceanography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology","score_opus":0.02357687104773091,"score_gpt":0.267661752152781,"score_spread":0.24408488110505008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009887758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99660385,0.000027530743,0.00004378748,0.0005422602,0.000004944546,0.0000038122196,0.000026206913,0.0000014660109,0.0027461466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993411,0.000044571127,0.000048127844,0.00005860815,0.0000057557745,0.000003733436,0.000028389093,9.645283e-7,0.0004687988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973446,0.00009174068,0.0000131617335,0.000031897038,0.000033385313,0.000095385665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983045,0.000457808,0.00040285723,0.0000508339,0.0001773144,0.00060664397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066316465,0.00017602094,0.00025532293,0.00037585865,0.0011030071,0.0017631658,0.0007255864,0.0011648645,0.0031495597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004223071,0.00015007776,0.00020730413,0.00036950083,0.00077845756,0.0012895438,0.0011625522,0.00094355084,0.00009951571],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012860696,0.0014947222,0.907837,0.00007041252,0.00030067196,0.0014231353,0.0053682397,0.02941956,0.0014215631,0.008321179,0.007088638,0.035968754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011498126,0.00047252112,0.9100176,0.000042434756,0.00014427686,0.0002525106,0.024333935,0.05530768,0.0002926262,0.005384386,0.0036002477,0.000036793423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15871546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4058596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15871546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002438248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015159277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3155833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044978021","doi":"10.1007/bf03354031","title":"Overview of mitigation scenarios for global climate stabilization based on new IPCC emission scenarios (SRES)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Baseline (sea); Environmental science; Range (aeronautics); Salient; Climate change; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Engineering","score_opus":0.07844365600043438,"score_gpt":0.2948826910999402,"score_spread":0.21643903509950582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044978021","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04772993,0.30790123,0.2695632,0.013355843,0.0023589216,0.0018551631,0.071530744,0.006345709,0.27935925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22139958,0.37699753,0.28708974,0.0023597095,0.0018160857,0.0017284052,0.056902613,0.00082103914,0.050885398],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962485,0.00009265583,0.0000426232,0.00004709525,0.00015617408,0.000036539983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994677,0.00015763109,0.00007629587,0.000037147245,0.00023357183,0.000027825316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014147459,0.0014211093,0.000649445,0.0037862235,0.00030855066,0.0014532135,0.0006962844,0.0006967534,0.009058893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012383307,0.00044775524,0.00077391055,0.003469975,0.000103096216,0.0014876229,0.0005091269,0.0006080942,0.0019360433],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004134314,0.00016796807,0.0038883297,0.003742599,0.00049523206,0.00026011706,0.00011525641,0.09945563,0.005465334,0.050280094,0.13821459,0.69750136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008835872,0.00016663126,0.01009482,0.0011418307,0.0005205164,0.0002663895,0.0000875548,0.023216713,0.0025849885,0.042078383,0.91968846,0.000065331136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006400281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009972237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009058893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011123403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001366995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030305028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107256045","doi":"10.1007/bf03354028","title":"On the index of environmental awareness","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Otsuka Canada Pharmaceutical","keywords":"Index (typography); Global environmental analysis; Key (lock); Business; Economics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.025975361158254544,"score_gpt":0.21857176817353163,"score_spread":0.19259640701527708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107256045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5719778,0.006241441,0.05948202,0.04137601,0.0009026892,0.0000921038,0.0027891153,0.00025364576,0.31688523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892201,0.001233271,0.0022167112,0.00039862745,0.00040957943,0.00003703106,0.00039744124,0.000023336985,0.0060640625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912494,0.00038639005,0.00004837095,0.00012650734,0.00020325521,0.00011046643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98344153,0.011687284,0.0020026448,0.0009279667,0.0012822788,0.0006583101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015895617,0.0003237783,0.0005124686,0.002838844,0.0006316759,0.0028729364,0.00053033006,0.001526795,0.010331819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022259463,0.000119843346,0.00023629593,0.003369465,0.0018464555,0.005359876,0.0012356198,0.0015599575,0.0010559285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016850203,0.000096592,0.04445836,0.00006533386,0.0000626976,0.0001389872,0.0006341002,0.004492051,0.00035844126,0.88934857,0.015388714,0.04478759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028900471,0.000082298684,0.05387588,0.00009375888,0.00004432819,0.0002581281,0.0009422054,0.019714914,0.00056145666,0.90451777,0.019836526,0.000043910888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021383436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001635726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010331819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013972304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005086949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034563363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2505001007","doi":"10.1007/s10018-019-00254-6","title":"Survival of the cleanest? Evidence from a plant-level analysis of pollutant emissions in Canadian pulp and paper industry, 2005–2013","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pollutant; Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Pulp (tooth); Natural resource economics; Production (economics); Emission intensity; Economics; Environmental engineering; Environmental economics; Agricultural economics; Engineering; Ecology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02551104968291834,"score_gpt":0.2586745769035592,"score_spread":0.23316352722064088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2505001007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96942073,0.008913822,0.00035396274,0.0030492332,0.000037105998,0.00003601111,0.00969703,0.000015709255,0.008476513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913722,0.0028728135,0.00013536112,0.0004074432,0.000015788994,0.000007711581,0.00364744,0.0000067412643,0.0015343378],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977266,0.00024064901,0.000114955285,0.00031822736,0.0008611852,0.00073830073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98836356,0.0019238859,0.002741949,0.0005608593,0.0053362567,0.0010734933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003180678,0.0004369606,0.0004621835,0.0015614956,0.0019851008,0.0021283864,0.0019154414,0.000787158,0.0020895873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083250245,0.00025538233,0.0007888057,0.006387204,0.0017239173,0.0008087927,0.0012273788,0.0011219747,0.00020051756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064510707,0.0001262635,0.9641443,0.00043388284,0.0010796748,0.00020428417,0.0015331897,0.001789982,0.00039159265,0.0013587376,0.0072595836,0.021033222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012952085,0.000034500445,0.99271834,0.000074891,0.00036364657,0.000015676522,0.0016527923,0.00039770995,0.0002209369,0.000103997874,0.004388513,0.000016052567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99680364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020478021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020478021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03426542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14857918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621542360","doi":"10.1007/s10018-017-0188-3","title":"The conversion of biodiversity-rich land and ecosystem services","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Biodiversity; Natural resource economics; Clearing; Land use; Business; Asset (computer security); Land use, land-use change and forestry; Production (economics); Agriculture; Ecosystem; Land development; Agricultural land; Environmental resource management; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.010229589618339464,"score_gpt":0.2120546035130973,"score_spread":0.20182501389475782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621542360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69747555,0.008561833,0.0077613876,0.026951512,0.00026511255,0.000043758926,0.00051371136,0.00006356645,0.25836363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953218,0.001322653,0.00035606787,0.00055499765,0.00008947499,0.000006859824,0.00004281184,0.000005531888,0.0022998024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992144,0.00028566673,0.000029463568,0.00007249022,0.00017267112,0.00022526253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911755,0.0003337803,0.0001612156,0.00015560465,0.00007673704,0.00015510934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009389275,0.00026163645,0.00021198257,0.0012737602,0.0007564361,0.003443714,0.00046187366,0.0011948011,0.007741114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029448671,0.00017645281,0.00046673883,0.0015651077,0.0068799388,0.0028991217,0.002673597,0.0012292741,0.00021428682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001466424,0.00018970676,0.022579994,0.00019092734,0.00011179994,0.00044882266,0.00062839896,0.0112876315,0.0026532183,0.89540416,0.0030077319,0.06335097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023359893,0.00008585109,0.105715364,0.0001720547,0.000055089084,0.00082049513,0.0032250783,0.0061553046,0.0016897854,0.81911737,0.06290966,0.000030639774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01241379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030743957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01241379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027827255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015541472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025896609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767232554","doi":"10.1007/s10018-017-0201-x","title":"Which is greener: secularity or religiosity? Environmental philanthropy along religiosity spectrum","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Attendance; Church attendance; Social psychology; Secularity; Population; Religious identity; Demographic economics; Psychology; Sociology; Socioeconomics; Political science; Economics; Demography; Law","score_opus":0.027850333495945342,"score_gpt":0.30580340668051315,"score_spread":0.2779530731845678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767232554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749297,0.00027915646,0.0005549884,0.008609498,0.000042153155,0.00000895199,0.000079921265,0.0000031135057,0.015492456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930155,0.00007876949,0.00006186746,0.00020387885,0.000008835433,0.0000013484065,0.00001084315,0.0000020935458,0.0003308548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924916,0.00034710937,0.000025486717,0.00006262713,0.00011281949,0.00020276953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391973,0.0017016126,0.0018551082,0.0003326657,0.0007996821,0.0013911673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016932301,0.000090138456,0.0001849275,0.00065798935,0.0011059818,0.002166228,0.00027106568,0.00050084596,0.0053652804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006865322,0.00010672186,0.00012081658,0.00083735446,0.0027577416,0.0016861206,0.0013196504,0.0014669857,0.000259909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025282183,0.00031834832,0.8492314,0.000091731185,0.00015645126,0.0003474812,0.030557329,0.00022003865,0.0015351847,0.04657878,0.002758877,0.06795149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002396741,0.00014363643,0.85481805,0.0001488279,0.00007476724,0.00016884752,0.10066906,0.00053369976,0.00047827628,0.033918314,0.008993404,0.000029224202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035311198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008474414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053652804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007588154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089221844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017948687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770278623","doi":"10.1007/s10018-017-0205-6","title":"Effectiveness of two pricing structures on urban water use and conservation: a quasi-experimental investigation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Tariff; Water pricing; Scheme (mathematics); Economics; Demand management; Variable pricing; Block (permutation group theory); Environmental economics; Water conservation; Business; Microeconomics; Water resources; Mathematics; International economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.02025749754329546,"score_gpt":0.23298672129131015,"score_spread":0.2127292237480147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770278623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99774027,0.000024993864,0.00051818695,0.000088950124,0.000045973382,0.00040092712,0.00008675438,0.0000107913675,0.0010830422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995017,0.00004110853,0.0017626837,0.000080592596,0.00005459714,0.0013674138,0.000089031266,0.0000133358835,0.0015742611],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.98712236,0.007049677,0.00075772736,0.0022455207,0.001344538,0.0014802208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8706292,0.10946607,0.009019965,0.005798169,0.0018247201,0.0032619226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012768746,0.0012614874,0.0021554714,0.0009989233,0.0017495455,0.0038379452,0.0026534004,0.003563594,0.013150888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047668546,0.0015631595,0.0011734187,0.0006881315,0.0051839454,0.003737545,0.0018222799,0.003628866,0.0008333419],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.2828588,0.6073914,0.023827584,0.00092594605,0.0009207806,0.00023039391,0.0032996188,0.019606352,0.014939121,0.013907347,0.0009949264,0.031097729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.117700994,0.65703356,0.10230302,0.00017762266,0.0024018378,0.0001345657,0.0046914076,0.07183642,0.01945525,0.020047788,0.003585793,0.00063177553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035825078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021151328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013150888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034227155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032939813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06752837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000660161","doi":"10.1007/s10018-020-00263-w","title":"Climate sensitivity, agricultural productivity and the social cost of carbon in FUND","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Social cost; Productivity; Agriculture; Econometrics; Agricultural productivity; Sensitivity (control systems); Carbon fibers; Distribution (mathematics); Upper and lower bounds; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Ecology; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.09419693513729262,"score_gpt":0.26401488028872905,"score_spread":0.16981794515143644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000660161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649253,0.0007619019,0.02042394,0.0020794554,0.00004377905,0.000013950441,0.00028904263,0.00002607076,0.011436503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868387,0.00018938784,0.00039204725,0.000028810844,0.000013056998,0.000004617316,0.000027197293,0.000003509307,0.00065736915],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997731,0.00010541384,0.000007927979,0.000030195924,0.00003063592,0.000052654188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963272,0.0025530418,0.0006452866,0.00012174827,0.000182682,0.0001699798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011385373,0.00031278905,0.00038254017,0.00066669786,0.00030274328,0.0016185266,0.00048609992,0.0007993273,0.0025490301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007017861,0.00014176116,0.00033707553,0.0006308306,0.0012891889,0.0021407746,0.00097287423,0.0006800794,0.00007668863],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015013183,0.00007369145,0.028638711,0.000076573364,0.00009813909,0.00028926856,0.00019055048,0.7413053,0.00096550444,0.21929291,0.0012300458,0.007689118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029098357,0.00010807506,0.01865072,0.0000494799,0.00007643145,0.00016677313,0.00041841718,0.59576225,0.0008717835,0.38042971,0.00338436,0.000052863914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005693339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003495145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005693339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019987063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004991895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014501691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120649148","doi":"10.1007/s10018-020-00298-z","title":"Adoption and diffusion of conservation agriculture technology in Zambia: the role of social and institutional networks","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Business; Social network (sociolinguistics); Public economics; Hazard model; Economics; Economic growth; Agricultural economics; Geography; Political science; Actuarial science; Social media","score_opus":0.013796459393767214,"score_gpt":0.22058620603641158,"score_spread":0.20678974664264435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120649148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99868697,0.00023457808,0.000043709395,0.00030371224,0.0000010050663,0.000009586739,0.00004307432,0.0000010337279,0.00067635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996425,0.00013565825,0.000035253426,0.000009121446,6.474859e-7,0.0000039424076,0.000014537103,2.8407078e-7,0.0001581283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993612,0.00016431892,0.000033662447,0.000058487778,0.0000475126,0.00033473552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971922,0.0010673596,0.001279693,0.000086235355,0.00019562503,0.00017884064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011100274,0.00014557286,0.00019176617,0.0011619283,0.0007522803,0.0016614287,0.0004269445,0.0005063337,0.0021254758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043802396,0.00019939271,0.00020692853,0.0015539541,0.000955142,0.0012214966,0.0011309943,0.0008260144,0.000072929826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034773574,0.00019178608,0.93312156,0.00021928531,0.00010256742,0.00065840135,0.023028951,0.0015639672,0.0018402544,0.009144695,0.00039667095,0.029384114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001208543,0.00006167612,0.98467606,0.000090733694,0.000046987792,0.000055287062,0.01151765,0.0015290971,0.00020665424,0.00039827492,0.0013971583,0.00000821837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21628247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27179074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21628247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039113946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022702268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43004715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138387265","doi":"10.1007/s10018-021-00304-y","title":"How effective are protected natural areas when roads are present? An analysis of the Peruvian case","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Deforestation (computer science); Amazon rainforest; Forest cover; Geography; Environmental protection; Fauna; Natural resource economics; Socioeconomic status; Agroforestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Population; Environmental health; Biology","score_opus":0.04350275998635308,"score_gpt":0.22950325749480718,"score_spread":0.1860004975084541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138387265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90064174,0.0017109545,0.0030994962,0.0057659284,0.000012643646,0.000054968288,0.00024334909,0.000022399741,0.08844847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99480987,0.0007264844,0.00045971683,0.00009717584,0.0000131015095,0.000029520203,0.00005671412,0.0000067316773,0.0038007332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863344,0.0007995823,0.000023800558,0.000078752724,0.00008640406,0.0003779406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945911,0.004215486,0.00049576646,0.00012924321,0.00030248682,0.00026605112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016266357,0.0004150793,0.0006469289,0.0017547781,0.0017564797,0.002902436,0.0014326063,0.0028041638,0.014373956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010727873,0.00037321736,0.00063995,0.0026286494,0.0021864949,0.0025188746,0.0022119125,0.0016152421,0.000359949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000855779,0.0009237342,0.108237304,0.0006528354,0.0005331602,0.015653396,0.007871564,0.08660124,0.0021147088,0.7145534,0.010606366,0.051396564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000518722,0.0012059291,0.23286597,0.00099446,0.0016349738,0.0089263,0.08312665,0.310493,0.0020834936,0.291323,0.06659485,0.00023257031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04731527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059989225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04731527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030559723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012728615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09407973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179559498","doi":"10.1007/s10018-021-00317-7","title":"Does green policy pay dividends?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; Algoma University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Openness to experience; Dividend; Index (typography); Human capital; Econometrics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.022184691447525107,"score_gpt":0.22832406273559003,"score_spread":0.20613937128806492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179559498","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39173263,0.013775449,0.0051894034,0.4075553,0.0039010698,0.000049002054,0.0010704548,0.00029518362,0.17643154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980584,0.0018215773,0.00021461285,0.008242685,0.0014065591,0.000012649226,0.000097598335,0.00004115626,0.0075791357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779356,0.0006250815,0.00009256885,0.00026765384,0.000496928,0.00072423083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96988744,0.019704718,0.0048238668,0.0011011717,0.0024344404,0.0020482922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004627284,0.00041180823,0.0014026373,0.0018112651,0.0014161741,0.00740852,0.00092926936,0.007093093,0.017545095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043615084,0.00042485868,0.00065860327,0.002189067,0.0032765344,0.008962173,0.0015262811,0.0047932398,0.0016132316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013400904,0.0011176099,0.055288736,0.0002814726,0.00053695176,0.00054121006,0.00077921984,0.007419979,0.00051084335,0.73499537,0.07824529,0.11894325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024007137,0.000099370205,0.03778289,0.00024871796,0.00021204395,0.00016684474,0.0024730766,0.007837607,0.0007432558,0.9068425,0.043286555,0.00006712909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012955103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011707782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017545095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004293195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003668462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058694243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322766911","doi":"10.1007/s10018-023-00364-2","title":"Reply to comment on “climate sensitivity, agricultural productivity and the social cost of carbon in fund” by Philip Meyer","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Economics; Carbon tax; Social cost; Sensitivity (control systems); Distribution (mathematics); Climate policy; Agriculture; Climate change; Value (mathematics); Carbon fibers; Agricultural economics; Mathematics; Natural resource economics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Macroeconomics; Engineering; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.07590594314742978,"score_gpt":0.27709354779595086,"score_spread":0.2011876046485211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322766911","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015412661,0.0007347811,0.000067826484,0.9870947,0.011458067,0.0000042022248,0.000117841104,0.000020716096,0.00034773938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031827493,0.0008706901,0.00013833509,0.97325337,0.020311793,0.000028335684,0.000042432086,0.000039233117,0.002133014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670404,0.0010254164,0.00044588043,0.00065765646,0.0008296536,0.00033729296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803798,0.013349563,0.0010427507,0.0005066772,0.0035487397,0.0011725123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005906563,0.0011520699,0.0017240223,0.0009860656,0.0030929232,0.0032038959,0.004268133,0.0363474,0.009464724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04123276,0.0009811597,0.0017155241,0.0014735395,0.003953371,0.005652027,0.0022994746,0.042386513,0.0055303555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000228225,0.0000055600653,0.00013202107,0.000035370438,0.000007965429,0.00008266784,0.000073726194,0.000040380863,0.0000349255,0.0011552278,0.997195,0.0012143066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008989393,0.000046927336,0.002380971,0.00051206275,0.000050351202,0.00049000216,0.0008999812,0.0006111866,0.0005368048,0.009962767,0.98427606,0.00014302581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021370303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013932861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0363474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040739533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047333892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042491794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384406471","doi":"10.1007/s10018-023-00372-2","title":"Determinants of GHG emission intensity in Canadian industries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Energy intensity; Natural resource economics; Electricity; Renewable energy; Energy mix; Economics; Emission intensity; Panel data; Cointegration; Efficient energy use; Environmental science; Econometrics; Electricity generation; Engineering","score_opus":0.03736931749447315,"score_gpt":0.2410126042278263,"score_spread":0.20364328673335316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384406471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97422045,0.0014504457,0.0005013018,0.002405053,0.000013971566,0.00004194075,0.0039811744,0.000036320238,0.017349368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946891,0.0008820296,0.0001973295,0.000079777914,0.000008109589,0.0000061833625,0.001087502,0.000008076023,0.0030419445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876,0.00007051313,0.00004537218,0.000116365314,0.0004550428,0.0005527811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961765,0.0005547553,0.0006278094,0.00010176829,0.0019138792,0.0006252518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087954296,0.00035774708,0.0004304264,0.0028625424,0.0019706094,0.0026183682,0.0010046881,0.0006175396,0.0058409437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045325654,0.00036960654,0.0009822167,0.006312818,0.0011287249,0.0007220766,0.0010853698,0.0011776687,0.00024649382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016773705,0.0000835001,0.9629456,0.00008498117,0.00018893927,0.00016519196,0.0007425148,0.011346313,0.0008835688,0.009293442,0.0033981192,0.010700245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000800852,0.000008391641,0.9905785,0.0000348686,0.000051534076,0.000017493267,0.0009343001,0.0034657952,0.00018686483,0.00061904086,0.0040725,0.000022576221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99728465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99848676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06328519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06328519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053860664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45916831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386391636","doi":"10.1007/s10018-023-00374-0","title":"Free trade agreements with environmental provisions between asymmetric countries: transfer of clean technology and enforcement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Enforcement; International trade; Business; Environmental policy; Free trade agreement; Technology transfer; Clean-up; International economics; Economics; Free trade; Natural resource economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04422005105463498,"score_gpt":0.24414831999167677,"score_spread":0.1999282689370418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386391636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84255505,0.0004197479,0.037662853,0.0035479567,0.00020659919,0.00015628006,0.0002078561,0.000093996656,0.11514954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99413526,0.00010166568,0.0015853549,0.0001990578,0.00004107943,0.000037758742,0.000023303162,0.0000059499475,0.003870577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971269,0.001246699,0.00013252179,0.00029610936,0.00048159648,0.0007161467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98821056,0.006464537,0.002893471,0.00095485547,0.0006800633,0.0007964364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047694542,0.0005176044,0.00093420973,0.0007281281,0.0020884015,0.0038019815,0.0011648446,0.0033619953,0.013250301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016176775,0.0004118691,0.0014428708,0.00072462653,0.00420137,0.0037147808,0.0032453896,0.002832597,0.0004746986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054589077,0.00044976504,0.0072226212,0.00019783,0.0001784105,0.00087796035,0.00038155902,0.3045639,0.0028292043,0.66813534,0.0022929036,0.012324628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010200479,0.00095840957,0.012666742,0.0002829017,0.00030996755,0.00029474252,0.0020070982,0.25632787,0.0027379845,0.7075617,0.015698796,0.00013379658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007821241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005015243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013250301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027777597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021750934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044326663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394982592","doi":"10.1007/s10018-024-00396-2","title":"Overallocation in the California-Québec carbon market: a non-constraining cap until 2030","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Carbon market; Economics; Political science; Climate change; Market economy; Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.011330916280277915,"score_gpt":0.23590123151666306,"score_spread":0.22457031523638515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394982592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4630717,0.003919314,0.0023929141,0.093608275,0.001036629,0.00015658744,0.014895013,0.0003787682,0.42054078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91187096,0.0007849195,0.0009209863,0.008260972,0.00012184886,0.000041673622,0.0019428583,0.000057398316,0.07599844],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991873,0.000049292692,0.000011074235,0.00007197575,0.00022814586,0.00045223208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983177,0.00010384493,0.00009843784,0.000032864144,0.0009850851,0.00046215297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010504014,0.00033087275,0.0003302053,0.00056411093,0.002412741,0.00440897,0.001216103,0.002294316,0.016088579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026743144,0.00016594445,0.0005301971,0.00074859493,0.0007092164,0.0017965793,0.0006453881,0.001910084,0.00076724996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011075233,0.0005295083,0.07889376,0.00031249854,0.00014750191,0.0011032943,0.0011066527,0.034159433,0.0037034357,0.24313907,0.54347247,0.09232496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022204923,0.00023841721,0.32333407,0.00034365788,0.00013963168,0.00018606683,0.0039062463,0.043292403,0.0020268895,0.02504878,0.60106874,0.00019304265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97390896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98999256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9603087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03969135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05489806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28798229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402602162","doi":"10.1007/s10018-024-00411-6","title":"Bioprospecting, drug choices and conservation of biological diversity under free trade","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Economics and Policy Studies","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioprospecting; Diversity (politics); Social policy; Economics; Biology; Ecology; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.08351119623504226,"score_gpt":0.28663156292944125,"score_spread":0.20312036669439898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402602162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.816876,0.0135737285,0.028399765,0.029445872,0.00014192623,0.00013012759,0.0006523459,0.00006069302,0.11071966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939322,0.0011439368,0.0009503215,0.0010814624,0.00008917003,0.00001676515,0.000035968285,0.000003559923,0.0027465285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978872,0.0011348232,0.00007658555,0.00022224999,0.00035195972,0.0003270978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98501706,0.009946872,0.002662262,0.0009929787,0.00058631133,0.00079455646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005856001,0.00028144126,0.00063255365,0.0012389225,0.0011378021,0.0042621465,0.0006590494,0.0039639813,0.005997663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012992822,0.00020337131,0.0007059934,0.0010128437,0.005437302,0.0047060265,0.001536817,0.0013998416,0.0001779203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018782066,0.00067090685,0.027996276,0.00051231286,0.00040241692,0.0005803851,0.0005109269,0.04784527,0.004907736,0.8156703,0.003652794,0.09537237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012601452,0.00042479803,0.016247107,0.00013574252,0.00007338784,0.00019528887,0.00037598857,0.0143946195,0.0012044584,0.9588538,0.007930428,0.000038428705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055865175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007234774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005997663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035124014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002457501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030969918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}