{"meta":{"query_hash":"c9c584e5f082","filters":{"venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review"},"cohort_total":72,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":72,"exported":72,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c9c584e5f082","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Environmental+Impact+Assessment+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1969703078","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2004.12.003","title":"Citizen involvement in sustainability-centred environmental assessment follow-up","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Stewardship (theology); Environmental stewardship; Environmental planning; Credibility; Citizen journalism; Work (physics); Strategic environmental assessment; Public participation; Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental impact assessment; Business; Public relations; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.014436129966391282,"score_gpt":0.3206159041963598,"score_spread":0.30617977422996856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969703078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5490551,0.046217147,0.05470624,0.043010194,0.0023064034,0.0034461336,0.00045242102,0.00047088825,0.3003354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95486,0.008537965,0.014463965,0.00398123,0.0002406518,0.0016004967,0.00031540784,0.0000541203,0.015946332],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96051335,0.028366255,0.0018549501,0.0012313618,0.005639839,0.002394224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.907026,0.06540049,0.0058480506,0.004797075,0.013208265,0.0037201308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04413021,0.0002610626,0.0005984985,0.0018170512,0.0023925127,0.0021344747,0.0015828257,0.002385737,0.0052534337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070172474,0.00031061732,0.0007614067,0.0013419956,0.0007610868,0.0029557338,0.0038124234,0.0015950333,0.00082742336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051242876,0.0010785017,0.056042366,0.0028143616,0.00015366843,0.0010877175,0.008235035,0.0005725456,0.0019987049,0.005011965,0.01199903,0.9104938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003174548,0.0025454555,0.30028644,0.009308834,0.0008697876,0.0036837468,0.03254038,0.0033880225,0.017511781,0.013555373,0.6158582,0.00013449088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040842993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012848485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04413021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016328372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009235045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23338562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970219229","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2010.08.001","title":"Bringing science into river systems cumulative effects assessment practice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative effects; Watershed; Environmental resource management; Globe; Process (computing); Scale (ratio); Conceptual framework; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Drainage basin; Environmental science; Computer science; Geography; Ecology; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0075860666337018365,"score_gpt":0.3662456978348396,"score_spread":0.3586596312011378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970219229","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011210543,0.33775327,0.22161548,0.32028538,0.008768684,0.00029755963,0.0003397923,0.00056624867,0.09916302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33513838,0.44302812,0.16699582,0.032303832,0.007049097,0.000483461,0.00028842353,0.00023627226,0.014476626],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836775,0.007259327,0.0015214649,0.0013895768,0.005849603,0.00030252212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89858466,0.059227988,0.0033118469,0.0073832204,0.030213995,0.0012782965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043214455,0.0007064231,0.0010980347,0.006760789,0.0014790257,0.0069483244,0.0033374054,0.0032399104,0.0037882132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063414864,0.00053313887,0.00083745184,0.004893979,0.0072375042,0.011110906,0.004047326,0.005890463,0.00070912926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031076004,0.00012517434,0.0035830182,0.0041832975,0.00029651253,0.00021097854,0.0025430918,0.010719226,0.0010817611,0.28373015,0.066021286,0.6274744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022131324,0.000115575196,0.0018473807,0.0035646893,0.00015785811,0.00013867357,0.0019692052,0.0027960292,0.0009492077,0.38369742,0.60468876,0.000053084616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015307677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030145215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043214455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058490406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013386594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22854263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976289169","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2005.02.002","title":"Accounting for social impacts and costs in the forest industry, British Columbia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Accounting method; Investment (military); Accounting information system; Accounting; Business; Social cost; Social accounting; Economics; Finance; Natural resource economics; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.020047223028783978,"score_gpt":0.3158211920790477,"score_spread":0.2957739690502637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976289169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4471323,0.29451045,0.0042263577,0.018930083,0.0009217298,0.0003279049,0.018931678,0.00026858386,0.21475087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7889468,0.15500954,0.0032954814,0.0005089479,0.00016590685,0.00006515844,0.0047015906,0.000056572746,0.04725006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975948,0.000315481,0.0001794619,0.00009380994,0.0016132175,0.0002032265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99218917,0.00086946023,0.00052406715,0.00014968995,0.006080924,0.00018673329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021921217,0.00046622747,0.00038588312,0.008849721,0.001431732,0.0033897494,0.00094480993,0.00047833603,0.0015021303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066324426,0.00029654772,0.00035430325,0.014138583,0.00060665596,0.00089545187,0.00043505518,0.0006089322,0.00020403905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016854293,0.000091633105,0.14310737,0.0022815387,0.0004718364,0.00037414712,0.000995891,0.040417444,0.0011193628,0.020617226,0.10471741,0.6856377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000387699,0.0000713706,0.6339842,0.0030819871,0.0011046113,0.00039670285,0.003535658,0.025638394,0.0020379513,0.008848777,0.32108867,0.00017296584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9697632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039771818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039771818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050472997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2885661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000422052","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2013.10.001","title":"Comparative life cycle assessments: The case of paper and digital media","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Recycling and Waste Management Techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Context (archaeology); Information and Communications Technology; Product (mathematics); Footprint; Ecological footprint; Computer science; Environmental impact assessment; Digital media; Consumption (sociology); Environmental economics; Business; Sustainability; Production (economics); World Wide Web; Mathematics; Economics; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.018003572834682187,"score_gpt":0.33662763858413897,"score_spread":0.3186240657494568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000422052","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32856852,0.48072562,0.028313918,0.003370011,0.00048606363,0.0008371151,0.004595246,0.00014971048,0.15295376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72774273,0.23279911,0.021441266,0.00070952205,0.00014292916,0.000450239,0.0017550979,0.00009242812,0.014866616],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964066,0.00162035,0.00019940267,0.00021309422,0.0013014758,0.000258992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868194,0.008738071,0.00071410707,0.00043132898,0.0031068707,0.00019034302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071663265,0.00084456993,0.0008226721,0.009505779,0.0007462999,0.0028696042,0.0017835135,0.0013677881,0.0063495897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011554914,0.00024383004,0.0015690364,0.007152352,0.00064045796,0.003943383,0.0011140301,0.00084201153,0.00053924316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025174352,0.0011023165,0.012267531,0.015140645,0.0010529137,0.000735969,0.0024405778,0.019021038,0.013033923,0.04274526,0.009238381,0.8807041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028243213,0.011008612,0.11241061,0.01609127,0.0040884013,0.002297777,0.02319085,0.02785463,0.08453844,0.08227673,0.6354897,0.00047060286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011968585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022680772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011968585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00431143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025051152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037899613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000876807","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2004.06.009","title":"Towards increasing the utility of follow-up in Canadian EIA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental quality; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Environmental impact statement; Management science; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Business; Environmental economics; Process management; Engineering; Political science; Economics; Environmental science; Law","score_opus":0.01699637251230605,"score_gpt":0.32517793647328147,"score_spread":0.3081815639609754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000876807","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19362465,0.2620136,0.05767582,0.21162517,0.003908079,0.0044306987,0.012208561,0.0020338115,0.2524796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76614505,0.09059047,0.08711259,0.024464143,0.00065246894,0.0016000033,0.0036757633,0.00017191323,0.025587568],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99152535,0.0033093954,0.00068641297,0.00047943025,0.0029929208,0.0010064875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94260514,0.013920997,0.0019403026,0.0019416019,0.036668148,0.0029237908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03022613,0.0005824471,0.00080572336,0.0038572175,0.00282825,0.0031884701,0.00292257,0.0014641456,0.005747627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04935419,0.00035225335,0.0012154464,0.0038111596,0.0010400519,0.0020218156,0.0022653835,0.0020343727,0.00057219056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000627262,0.00024150632,0.054173123,0.0031051887,0.00027859627,0.000284373,0.0021374524,0.0034775867,0.00080350926,0.008889476,0.040984876,0.884997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052512035,0.0008976582,0.41297042,0.015280793,0.0019454848,0.00079773844,0.0063304985,0.008087886,0.0037933122,0.008369513,0.5407162,0.0002852858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9649647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98221326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028929114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10768148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20989639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003728007","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.006","title":"Public participation in strategic environmental assessment (SEA): Critical review and the Quebec (Canada) approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Public participation; Strategic environmental assessment; Environmental planning; Process (computing); Environmental impact assessment; Hazardous waste; Agriculture; Environmental resource management; Political science; Public policy; Business; Public administration; Engineering; Geography; Environmental science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03392083458791019,"score_gpt":0.3430195457179011,"score_spread":0.30909871112999093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003728007","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057607302,0.8451373,0.0015788006,0.11677346,0.003928147,0.0006024801,0.0007075092,0.000032356733,0.025479263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20522971,0.7261174,0.0060161473,0.049805246,0.0023994285,0.0014863401,0.0005480626,0.00004618207,0.008351563],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95143247,0.02262156,0.0027049568,0.0014122748,0.01812994,0.0036988198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78862053,0.092954196,0.0077644396,0.002228538,0.10332763,0.0051045762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.094460525,0.0011493958,0.0020052476,0.013846742,0.005728899,0.008538879,0.004295854,0.006399217,0.002832088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12301368,0.00063976954,0.0011815716,0.018655835,0.0074621723,0.0038034478,0.002621714,0.003595218,0.00023850056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005973933,0.00020810668,0.008649609,0.041294996,0.0010375914,0.0003428623,0.007430066,0.003337962,0.00039074596,0.05982049,0.35288784,0.5240024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029246585,0.00024114421,0.026873033,0.077591464,0.0021672018,0.00014598267,0.009621337,0.0011868312,0.0006940852,0.011278822,0.86971956,0.00018803342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94864225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97763157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12972036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12972036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3788688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9411915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006891688","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2013.10.003","title":"Public participation in and learning through SEA in Kenya","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Transformative learning; Notice; Strengths and weaknesses; Public participation; Public relations; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Action (physics); Focus group; Community engagement; Action learning; Environmental planning; Psychology; Business; Geography; Cooperative learning; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Marketing; Teaching method","score_opus":0.03200997882177668,"score_gpt":0.35028795526346257,"score_spread":0.3182779764416859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006891688","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38357562,0.47085395,0.00049602933,0.038047463,0.0007403652,0.00032290423,0.0006858463,0.000016041446,0.105261795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7717909,0.21977912,0.0004876612,0.0015915212,0.000103978884,0.00018134776,0.00019459412,0.000005977862,0.0058649327],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977629,0.0011822708,0.00015296541,0.00008149297,0.00034052823,0.00047985738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558336,0.00252151,0.00074714894,0.0000623994,0.00057184073,0.00051379896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004430067,0.00028343388,0.00033472056,0.0012114033,0.0018058702,0.0017901208,0.0005510939,0.001121044,0.005280677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071439054,0.00018034413,0.00026810195,0.0022228982,0.0012664583,0.0026397768,0.0021737486,0.001096785,0.00022404779],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008588197,0.0006647475,0.04557015,0.027581854,0.00031456453,0.0011378224,0.032863215,0.0007071468,0.00096780434,0.018886324,0.020861158,0.8495865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025974022,0.0010918258,0.26658207,0.061819136,0.0008940649,0.00077393063,0.122357905,0.00030496615,0.0021361075,0.005225861,0.5384421,0.00011234141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050077625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21080069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050077625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033576633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014830339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09957224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037578666","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2007.01.001","title":"Assessing the assessments: Pharmaceuticals in the environment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"European Commission; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk assessment; Risk management; Precautionary principle; Environmental planning; Value (mathematics); Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental risk assessment; Environmental science; Computer science; Computer security; Biotechnology","score_opus":0.06336547692016457,"score_gpt":0.4659907709260957,"score_spread":0.4026252940059311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037578666","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029463872,0.6880283,0.043320637,0.07205055,0.0023391293,0.00026428117,0.0008606354,0.00021016208,0.1634625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28853878,0.6387648,0.04076254,0.00878059,0.0019360576,0.00015986053,0.00041422696,0.00006207762,0.020581147],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99018806,0.0049507273,0.0004135647,0.0002476635,0.0039744433,0.00022550857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890324,0.0045062313,0.0011513667,0.00026301172,0.0047470443,0.00029993002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012082837,0.0013867564,0.0011187184,0.0034996367,0.0007364044,0.0047160117,0.0012850607,0.0026572945,0.0028389692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014818012,0.0002591296,0.000932099,0.00214107,0.0013238896,0.0036784846,0.0015114378,0.0014041562,0.00064647157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020828191,0.00021812378,0.0069103795,0.0055199955,0.00070508086,0.00051526923,0.00028256618,0.02175344,0.006551251,0.052561797,0.048813265,0.8559605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007322349,0.0009479155,0.014018819,0.0073702494,0.0011869075,0.0013498742,0.0021330316,0.01316435,0.015709996,0.123715706,0.82016057,0.00016923991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00870303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020565204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012082837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024849726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00813329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06390089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039858089","doi":"10.1016/s0195-9255(99)00044-x","title":"Understanding the role of forest simulation models in sustainable forest management","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Forest Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Ecoforestry; Forest management; Sustainability; Forest ecology; Environmental resource management; Sustainable forest management; Simulation modeling; Forest restoration; Forest dynamics; Empirical modelling; Climate change; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Ecology; Computer science; Agroforestry; Economics","score_opus":0.019611684030377587,"score_gpt":0.28498968078590525,"score_spread":0.26537799675552765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039858089","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08037524,0.4840831,0.32421547,0.053834945,0.0020151734,0.00011944002,0.0008211908,0.00071197166,0.053823497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48480326,0.41959226,0.08860343,0.001961196,0.00085390155,0.000112030044,0.0006812394,0.0001875321,0.0032051175],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860317,0.0008090285,0.00007131469,0.00009787504,0.00035870683,0.00005997463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97899854,0.01778665,0.00061129715,0.0006243124,0.0017323117,0.00024685354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073966077,0.0008006628,0.0010779446,0.0012497295,0.00041315283,0.0030738483,0.0013318222,0.0013635422,0.0026786244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022290057,0.00043710292,0.0005089527,0.0014518484,0.0010482641,0.006874646,0.00075456634,0.0018482818,0.00044073293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115571354,0.00021155977,0.0068609924,0.0031950546,0.00059420126,0.00010645327,0.0002443882,0.4515295,0.002176952,0.20545918,0.012436137,0.3170701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039745642,0.00015156658,0.0024529214,0.002102846,0.00038152118,0.00013745468,0.0005727099,0.5122972,0.0019115087,0.3402585,0.13960683,0.00008708087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009694646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013363934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009694646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001262455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027064248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039117455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043713817","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2010.02.003","title":"Indigenous community based participatory research and health impact assessment: A Canadian example","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Community-based participatory research; Participatory action research; Environmental planning; Community engagement; Community health; Citizen journalism; Health impact assessment; Biomonitoring; Adaptation (eye); Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental health; Geography; Public health; Economic growth; Public relations; Health care; Medicine; Psychology; Ecology; Environmental science; Nursing","score_opus":0.34981213714535647,"score_gpt":0.5734660937200398,"score_spread":0.2236539565746833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043713817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108534776,0.23276962,0.016342921,0.13603772,0.0018290579,0.0019678543,0.00091602333,0.00011906817,0.501483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75366986,0.16328704,0.030353984,0.010671816,0.0003364285,0.0011032533,0.00021459858,0.000081736456,0.040281266],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791199,0.011528623,0.00054590916,0.0007038017,0.006009057,0.0020926397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670643,0.019588972,0.0007084378,0.00079459016,0.010656562,0.0011871922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028307023,0.000566553,0.0009380445,0.004601451,0.013386217,0.005207905,0.0024810785,0.002224444,0.003637008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025045667,0.00037386423,0.0007009789,0.010442376,0.007217191,0.0017199093,0.0032022824,0.0018542381,0.00014593714],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000478018,0.0006290464,0.012856297,0.009327315,0.00031359427,0.0037013039,0.11744308,0.0025751526,0.0015558954,0.35051492,0.058107138,0.44249833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000487447,0.00044711414,0.05836469,0.008005803,0.0006143254,0.0011801051,0.11605681,0.0017667651,0.0012372751,0.04661945,0.76499236,0.00022788365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07600908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07600908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18307377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5514871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046456138","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2008.10.002","title":"Community-based approaches to strategic environmental assessment: Lessons from Costa Rica","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Livelihood; Environmental planning; Government (linguistics); Environmental resource management; Watershed; Process (computing); Notice; Environmental impact assessment; Business; Geography; Political science; Agriculture; Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.17000299610971534,"score_gpt":0.3600209466307973,"score_spread":0.19001795052108197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046456138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09840545,0.26438725,0.08160583,0.14737977,0.00090779783,0.0007261094,0.00037360322,0.0003955484,0.40581858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8557657,0.0901047,0.042056438,0.0036285329,0.0001970367,0.0004287745,0.0001292859,0.000060716087,0.007628934],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496305,0.0035405129,0.00014273703,0.00014642856,0.00081504666,0.00039229536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99323976,0.0031016532,0.00032153048,0.000454578,0.0024970933,0.00038532322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011703506,0.0008238385,0.00080318993,0.003805347,0.0025040528,0.0048845597,0.0019974313,0.0015342422,0.0020983506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011069612,0.0002329259,0.00054481585,0.0054681883,0.0038919323,0.0031949452,0.0034075575,0.0016365991,0.00019850077],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004883209,0.00018775009,0.011149128,0.0025060673,0.000338332,0.0004924732,0.007136892,0.026777374,0.00045385593,0.39347932,0.021694958,0.535735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010522128,0.000204012,0.037117705,0.0071143783,0.0005662656,0.00052001054,0.040438976,0.027900591,0.0006842294,0.451115,0.4341245,0.00010913135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24562354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4524471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24562354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013138665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025190553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4883877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051758796","doi":"10.1016/s0195-9255(03)00093-3","title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of British Columbia's environmental assessment process for first nations' participation in mining development","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Measure (data warehouse); Government (linguistics); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental resource management; Public administration; Geography; Computer science; Law; Economics; Data mining","score_opus":0.03594808525868946,"score_gpt":0.40946902151545556,"score_spread":0.3735209362567661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051758796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86325127,0.018906433,0.0013511918,0.010761648,0.00027690292,0.0019781564,0.0011271933,0.00007482574,0.10227235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826334,0.0052708294,0.003150219,0.0012469402,0.00004264708,0.0005024333,0.0005863952,0.00001256985,0.006554538],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95777315,0.022608064,0.0016940783,0.00091229234,0.01444109,0.002571285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91361886,0.045582045,0.004534639,0.0014367853,0.031941105,0.0028865898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043954123,0.00058144593,0.0005385895,0.003980661,0.0048145615,0.005217935,0.002403962,0.0022775582,0.0017505228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08455024,0.00037978622,0.0005537679,0.0040620295,0.0014724314,0.0014902921,0.0019716169,0.0018312609,0.00023926355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008149363,0.0026650669,0.23448688,0.007017838,0.0017198246,0.00069675216,0.013252331,0.019061485,0.0028244636,0.00847856,0.034325022,0.66732246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016921676,0.0046666334,0.78339946,0.008029643,0.004834051,0.0002716492,0.03474065,0.01771332,0.008717035,0.0025399174,0.13307124,0.0003242438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9084892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97070104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94851303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051486995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10910892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3735661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054262779","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2003.08.001","title":"A state-of-practice survey of policy, plan, and program assessment in Canadian provinces","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Directive; Legislature; Plan (archaeology); Impact assessment; Environmental planning; Public administration; Environmental impact assessment; Order (exchange); Business; Political science; Environmental resource management; Geography; Finance; Economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.019124747533713914,"score_gpt":0.3788091897312692,"score_spread":0.3596844421975553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054262779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8584121,0.022416987,0.0013436538,0.028082311,0.0002297076,0.0013476731,0.018784763,0.00020682214,0.069175996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97734356,0.009332206,0.0018970388,0.0016498924,0.00003231936,0.00027078253,0.0036360463,0.000035637386,0.0058025694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9672806,0.0030925844,0.002574896,0.0013722703,0.021091176,0.0045885043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.805705,0.02399285,0.013961245,0.0030143105,0.1329114,0.020415189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019781774,0.00024833236,0.0006252117,0.012329444,0.0065718694,0.0050444617,0.004011154,0.001194454,0.0027267481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075117566,0.00089687353,0.0005790496,0.02843387,0.0016332468,0.0013851059,0.002038593,0.00117083,0.00019460132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036756022,0.00022116989,0.752912,0.0019241034,0.00024391482,0.0003165856,0.02055143,0.0018457463,0.00084477913,0.0059943646,0.05313844,0.16163984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025718042,0.000074843374,0.91516316,0.00081163464,0.00008910659,0.00008604132,0.013709143,0.00070837553,0.00030836687,0.00019008681,0.068767175,0.000066375826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81269133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18730867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4096571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94260675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055970798","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2007.12.002","title":"Incorporating cumulative effects into environmental assessments of mariculture: Limitations and failures of current siting methods","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Mariculture; Cumulative effects; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental science; Aquaculture; Environmental resource management; Marine ecosystem; Environmental planning; Ecosystem; Environmental protection; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology","score_opus":0.04548741292382731,"score_gpt":0.4133662394517072,"score_spread":0.3678788265278799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055970798","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17960402,0.066242255,0.7035206,0.0013701066,0.00079579285,0.0010723611,0.0039112284,0.0012935273,0.04219006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60034597,0.05531582,0.3352088,0.00091311184,0.00045911895,0.0009422333,0.001695661,0.00043707114,0.0046822317],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98353714,0.006581035,0.0018347179,0.001668226,0.0060964343,0.0002823784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9294154,0.045653295,0.0054848106,0.0070468155,0.012008513,0.00039122527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025896654,0.0024053736,0.0038819406,0.006489908,0.0012911612,0.005740408,0.0043789614,0.0013222155,0.0027282473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0472051,0.0009474263,0.002906623,0.008601601,0.0024475174,0.007988206,0.0042403303,0.0019121798,0.00095000374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023494463,0.00023574878,0.11155804,0.007688441,0.0038191092,0.00011169764,0.0012180307,0.03028141,0.005721803,0.0067908578,0.001916063,0.8304238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017274094,0.006678924,0.4885856,0.012124017,0.01757042,0.0024212722,0.010687521,0.16984066,0.03492546,0.14672527,0.109123975,0.0011441836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014680068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06230409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025896654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011046013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027199697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13695621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057093129","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2008.05.004","title":"Promise and dismay: The state of strategic environmental assessment systems and practices in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Variety (cybernetics); Directive; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Maturity (psychological); Environmental impact assessment; Management science; Political science; Computer science; Geography; Environmental science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.0355920713806966,"score_gpt":0.3298707094809276,"score_spread":0.294278638100231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057093129","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038654596,0.42935866,0.006014004,0.41501713,0.002117656,0.00018679179,0.001350658,0.00029448082,0.107006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66209924,0.2650885,0.015415136,0.033069365,0.00062579813,0.00011540047,0.0009653742,0.00015157029,0.022469662],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651855,0.0051248022,0.0015583038,0.001684405,0.022886781,0.0035601414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89861625,0.014342374,0.0033211275,0.0018014029,0.0740747,0.007844158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039381288,0.0005350721,0.0009140313,0.006483765,0.008950398,0.019550236,0.005522161,0.0037381502,0.0027869854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055191975,0.00067273004,0.0005774117,0.013357435,0.010142742,0.005104248,0.0036959366,0.0034478074,0.00030201074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000170139,0.00010287566,0.019349648,0.004462227,0.00018377809,0.00034996626,0.008144525,0.006307295,0.00096841325,0.21435988,0.17984942,0.5657518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041783227,0.00009359521,0.041559666,0.0050397217,0.0001873198,0.00022271714,0.010621138,0.0026351663,0.00086092285,0.030273339,0.90822,0.00024467177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9887106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83207715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16792282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5246697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9650916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063102212","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2004.06.012","title":"Collaborative environmental assessment in the Northwest Territories, Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Process (computing); Environmental planning; Intervention (counseling); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Business; Geography; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.006129383458699163,"score_gpt":0.29165756154242267,"score_spread":0.2855281780837235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063102212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09743592,0.21065195,0.024832519,0.03549295,0.0028086058,0.0019668506,0.03294755,0.00128202,0.5925817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41928717,0.10685907,0.036966447,0.0035375443,0.00023788259,0.00069201743,0.01458223,0.0002492774,0.41758844],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565977,0.0004380844,0.0001487149,0.00021049829,0.003117992,0.00042486802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99002624,0.00047522903,0.0002594307,0.00020169948,0.008348814,0.0006886439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050095804,0.00058734673,0.00058247737,0.0038228128,0.004294141,0.0025773162,0.0018027115,0.00097330124,0.004715356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005014146,0.0003467767,0.00045263546,0.008616688,0.0006497431,0.00087811315,0.0013483204,0.00062905345,0.00057182426],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021835153,0.00016101092,0.04408446,0.0013996299,0.00025297233,0.0004958705,0.0015391612,0.007942437,0.00090148684,0.018308723,0.32500288,0.5996931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006356622,0.00006840302,0.1113946,0.0012866589,0.0003381056,0.00016566158,0.002799517,0.003254606,0.00183139,0.0020887512,0.8766453,0.0000632884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99349034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99736744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03836738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03836738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21552946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2783761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068581460","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.004","title":"Multi-jurisdictional environmental impact assessment: Canadian experiences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Harmonization; Jurisdiction; Standardization; Negotiation; Process (computing); Business; Environmental impact assessment; Public participation; Environmental planning; Process management; Public consultation; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law; Economics; Environmental science","score_opus":0.012748115258630904,"score_gpt":0.3446379580462673,"score_spread":0.3318898427876364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068581460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.418521,0.110927425,0.005817449,0.09489649,0.0012049861,0.0011203752,0.00489099,0.0002585846,0.36236274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85974187,0.074650094,0.0091798315,0.008160936,0.0001878952,0.00024767208,0.0017848674,0.00011306686,0.045933805],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99289715,0.0008234809,0.0002664626,0.00040304204,0.004564783,0.0010451215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98139715,0.0029360987,0.00064823433,0.0004132072,0.011750322,0.0028550206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008748523,0.00050967874,0.0005008135,0.003701407,0.010010801,0.004718434,0.0024486575,0.0015925666,0.005096089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010417856,0.00033769087,0.00064043724,0.012640775,0.002019229,0.0017614303,0.004228368,0.0016743155,0.0002622906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051756017,0.00095344655,0.07004665,0.0030196144,0.00034084602,0.0038178111,0.041336104,0.007137717,0.003597702,0.040047206,0.16939048,0.6597949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008463208,0.00018480181,0.168611,0.0009226724,0.00018459873,0.000792981,0.05099302,0.0010810135,0.0011394026,0.0035663836,0.7723041,0.00013542961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98723954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99694794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9235761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07642385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1836365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55449647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071654989","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2006.06.002","title":"Interpreting major industrial landscapes: Social follow-up on meanings, the case of two aluminium smelters, Alcan (Alma, Canada) and Pechiney (Dunkirk, France)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Interpretation (philosophy); Mediation; Geography; Perspective (graphical); Regional science; Sociology; Environmental planning; Political science; Social science; Visual arts","score_opus":0.009080394962918258,"score_gpt":0.2656910985234104,"score_spread":0.25661070356049215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071654989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7743595,0.00542705,0.0035888234,0.05143285,0.00012720613,0.00008351926,0.000065410015,0.00002645532,0.16488919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900709,0.0012958131,0.0010270806,0.0006791107,0.000022522128,0.000014963777,0.000019634956,0.000021696222,0.0068481867],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945035,0.0040812194,0.00009755134,0.00024278431,0.0004727471,0.00060217275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99374557,0.00447104,0.0004622275,0.00021396515,0.000713508,0.0003936814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00864486,0.00047312694,0.00038468957,0.0022084592,0.026346888,0.014059033,0.002367813,0.0040283413,0.0042901346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008936645,0.0003935377,0.00049380667,0.0033357085,0.037168548,0.0055690194,0.006806391,0.002798821,0.00025263074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024618957,0.000017957638,0.0028597424,0.000077111894,0.000009885555,0.0032502592,0.9401651,0.00025421713,0.0003209593,0.03733498,0.0027427226,0.012942355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062576687,0.000009127649,0.0040092473,0.00009507801,0.000010423784,0.00037289446,0.9447228,0.00012387746,0.00014817186,0.008209094,0.042282224,0.0000108215245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25448367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53161335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7455163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024220567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013122018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5060048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072314888","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.003","title":"Gross national happiness as a framework for health impact assessment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Island Health","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Public health; Government (linguistics); Social determinants of health; Public economics; Health policy; Population health; Health impact assessment; Economic growth; Corporate governance; Political science; Development economics; Business; Economics; Health care; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.03462260557494109,"score_gpt":0.5173359448991078,"score_spread":0.48271333932416677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072314888","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028813522,0.5592802,0.24096583,0.02275052,0.0047291038,0.001430041,0.0019651968,0.00032188874,0.13974367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5623128,0.2392982,0.18129586,0.0028197253,0.0015268263,0.002681457,0.0018971865,0.0001049568,0.0080630155],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951519,0.002577515,0.0005174409,0.00020710027,0.0013041169,0.00024192853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636394,0.0016894737,0.00035084883,0.0001332279,0.0013324462,0.00013004703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009281171,0.0010921593,0.0019016677,0.008159489,0.0010443546,0.0037781529,0.0016858911,0.00091288204,0.0016567672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074778027,0.000394422,0.001622163,0.0047515566,0.0025604798,0.0026058855,0.0025703816,0.002858167,0.00039195974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008557725,0.00024247826,0.012893809,0.005998608,0.0007524643,0.00028564737,0.0015497525,0.014464025,0.00094273215,0.41433415,0.029691843,0.51875895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004755877,0.00075991295,0.06499974,0.012127364,0.0013293916,0.0011262213,0.006743663,0.026364982,0.0018262871,0.29634765,0.5880072,0.00031999272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013775145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020929912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013775145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056735463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052746823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049084127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074445006","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2007.01.003","title":"Disaster incubation, cumulative impacts and the urban/ex-urban/rural dynamic","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental planning; Urban planning; Disaster mitigation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Civil engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.008141631201392706,"score_gpt":0.35774525738416435,"score_spread":0.34960362618277163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074445006","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016755784,0.96828073,0.0010917295,0.0032687979,0.00036459608,0.000012417226,0.000063281695,0.0000105512145,0.010152105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1608345,0.8358488,0.0005400117,0.00035988045,0.00041005205,0.00001778978,0.000054956992,0.0000036195004,0.001930347],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949634,0.00023726658,0.000037291356,0.000053082586,0.00011914288,0.000056837802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973496,0.0017309234,0.0004317965,0.000052094587,0.00035263033,0.000082880375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016206523,0.0003085127,0.00055473973,0.0017216828,0.000461548,0.0015411209,0.00056637457,0.00080242567,0.0023122644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026302778,0.00015135479,0.00039364723,0.0028270064,0.0010355173,0.0013478467,0.0007064985,0.0006077993,0.00024736233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031515094,0.00014839234,0.03058362,0.012611408,0.00048887846,0.00129889,0.0012750474,0.006445627,0.001977266,0.027694112,0.016950581,0.900211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049065413,0.00089568045,0.18782826,0.009422078,0.0012133231,0.0065808287,0.0147398515,0.002217672,0.002627858,0.042598058,0.7316885,0.00013877485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060306094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014836506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060306094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010394928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020711767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011991024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167739703","doi":"10.1016/s0195-9255(03)00113-6","title":"Cumulative effect assessment in Canada: a regional framework for aquatic ecosystems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Stressor; Context (archaeology); Sustainable development; Environmental resource management; Aquatic ecosystem; Process (computing); Cumulative effects; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Environmental quality; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Ecology; Geography; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.0190629204048203,"score_gpt":0.3450755464443817,"score_spread":0.3260126260395614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167739703","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12058223,0.17043698,0.5305151,0.018909033,0.0009901074,0.0021116522,0.024619654,0.003523939,0.12831129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6205075,0.0638873,0.28169128,0.0015688532,0.00022067482,0.00077921344,0.005427725,0.0004174344,0.025500074],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958489,0.000822365,0.00024901904,0.0003180237,0.0024425385,0.00031913508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912553,0.0010033764,0.00048824796,0.00034364726,0.0064587304,0.0004506096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076785623,0.0014202347,0.0015957572,0.008530761,0.0025765551,0.003945347,0.004250928,0.0009473419,0.0028920402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010029854,0.0004410723,0.0023259737,0.008010884,0.00209094,0.0015357601,0.0020919193,0.001134819,0.00024764525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018697746,0.000150499,0.049423493,0.0033749524,0.001792575,0.000577193,0.0021506788,0.2806966,0.002658067,0.10808254,0.047574636,0.5033319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012074437,0.00055328355,0.2144703,0.004429927,0.006866017,0.0011861286,0.004545502,0.1596081,0.0033781491,0.116807304,0.48746455,0.0005700192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97204924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9887657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054264165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054264165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08960961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39371592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168207491","doi":"10.1016/s0195-9255(02)00017-3","title":"Eliciting public preferences for municipal water supply options","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Thunder; Taste; Water supply; Preference; Multivariate statistics; Point (geometry); Compensation (psychology); Process (computing); Water pressure; Business; Environmental science; Environmental economics; Environmental engineering; Economics; Geography; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.21065565379453402,"score_gpt":0.306989781755958,"score_spread":0.09633412796142396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168207491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9431255,0.00047141695,0.025083065,0.002180051,0.000022165665,0.00019049656,0.00044502484,0.000060542647,0.028421752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917778,0.00032536878,0.0059150564,0.00007364349,0.000014633212,0.0000751662,0.00017479382,0.000006718768,0.0016368148],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726665,0.0019030123,0.00009325362,0.00011510629,0.0004007865,0.00022124626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829129,0.015027675,0.0009135802,0.00044623623,0.00054247,0.00015715351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004841684,0.00037503758,0.00058268034,0.0004952248,0.0003030497,0.0018819225,0.0004469427,0.0013351395,0.0056787888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025880035,0.00025771483,0.00033734544,0.0011727621,0.0005388796,0.0021979043,0.000768245,0.0009146185,0.00040986764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008201002,0.0043271654,0.034501974,0.0022021984,0.00061108766,0.0007344831,0.00385467,0.25034782,0.01843571,0.19423313,0.020313734,0.462237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016343772,0.0019543844,0.028124923,0.00037788865,0.00045714024,0.00021930251,0.0092455195,0.60992336,0.0190226,0.30826655,0.020638052,0.00013588574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004049439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00994457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056787888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016786483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012676868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02560556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297695298","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2016.03.005","title":"Conceptualizing strategic environmental assessment: Principles, approaches and research directions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic environmental assessment; Sustainability; Process (computing); Corporate governance; Process management; Environmental planning; Management science; Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Strategic thinking; Strategic planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Environmental science; Ecology; Marketing","score_opus":0.15259637261035908,"score_gpt":0.40147077304221035,"score_spread":0.24887440043185127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297695298","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008640439,0.44538224,0.28837356,0.12148464,0.0020877281,0.00035093245,0.00036396354,0.00019187745,0.13312459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31302688,0.50373113,0.16518922,0.009759099,0.001105254,0.00081630656,0.00039110307,0.00012470124,0.0058563254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98839056,0.00692744,0.00060409325,0.00057286874,0.0028327636,0.0006723093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98786163,0.00790279,0.00096932426,0.00048788817,0.0023433948,0.00043496425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021921124,0.0021328297,0.0017715928,0.010827934,0.0023353028,0.0206916,0.0048536016,0.0048051123,0.0035741394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014670395,0.0007907049,0.0010918577,0.019498838,0.021502286,0.018916382,0.0041553755,0.0064967773,0.0007629567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046668993,0.00002532064,0.00043064036,0.001134842,0.000034205514,0.000027586684,0.00084376946,0.0031297635,0.00010141305,0.9586325,0.0044962107,0.03113905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074202985,0.00001839669,0.0004452734,0.0032319913,0.000035416644,0.000093861905,0.0042978995,0.0027909628,0.00015693987,0.9044416,0.084450975,0.00002918786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018205171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028728819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021921124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013527268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035706885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11593139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417294848","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2016.05.005","title":"Evaluating the environmental sustainability of biomass-based energy strategy: Using an impact matrix framework","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Alberta Innovates Bio Solutions; Innovate BC","keywords":"Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Nexus (standard); Business; Sustainable development; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Environmental planning; Environmental impact assessment; Energy security; Life-cycle assessment; Biomass (ecology); Climate change; Sustainability organizations; Ecosystem services; Economics; Renewable energy; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Production (economics); Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.047186784854294846,"score_gpt":0.4458686484480427,"score_spread":0.39868186359374785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2417294848","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15653107,0.20718268,0.39027834,0.01321764,0.00078987883,0.0033215089,0.003399769,0.0004698057,0.22480941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7202248,0.10993595,0.16210477,0.00047678384,0.00022748069,0.0009792636,0.00087810634,0.000064580716,0.0051082755],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99266326,0.0032554285,0.0005254767,0.00027795724,0.0030187734,0.00025914595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993584,0.0037155834,0.00081089576,0.00018132551,0.0015848129,0.00012342494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0095762545,0.0021909769,0.0017772855,0.011719357,0.0009091032,0.0070309313,0.0018068153,0.0012022314,0.0041605127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013501623,0.0005075826,0.002107012,0.008261805,0.0013536884,0.005704487,0.0025537494,0.0015692933,0.0002663854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024527038,0.0003913993,0.009686538,0.011138056,0.0034636678,0.0005630058,0.00047675404,0.22876927,0.0060711256,0.32725996,0.006699771,0.40523517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019374487,0.0019846899,0.027339786,0.012959176,0.006057444,0.0009198827,0.0050360556,0.2974437,0.012587418,0.46913686,0.16601756,0.00032375776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008801682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019881021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011719357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007903866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046156277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05734676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490023714","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.005","title":"Integration of environmental assessment with planning and policy-making on a regional scale: a literature review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Environmental regulation; Corporate governance; Pollution; Environmental pollution; Environmental governance; Business; Environmental economics; Probit model; Environmental management system; Index (typography); Scale (ratio); Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.022497991253376995,"score_gpt":0.3980435150679209,"score_spread":0.3755455238145439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490023714","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001603851,0.9984377,0.00018631597,0.00039749488,0.00010486352,0.000013275011,0.000030402425,0.000002850956,0.0006665712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011955332,0.9979025,0.00051951234,0.00020880824,0.000057218753,0.000009560262,0.000022160035,0.0000013873116,0.000083287734],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977756,0.0006553491,0.00048828276,0.00028462982,0.000691184,0.00010490797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912571,0.0061849244,0.0009971434,0.00013277671,0.0012576953,0.00017055111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057730083,0.001062526,0.0026646687,0.008340076,0.00048237017,0.003297319,0.0015564634,0.002004902,0.003937279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008983068,0.00064168056,0.0014456318,0.014383079,0.0010288719,0.0035508384,0.0016102984,0.0015809867,0.0006552509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057776986,0.000104163235,0.00088429014,0.2064819,0.0007116406,0.00025043788,0.0004007967,0.0006391613,0.0008640527,0.0062418366,0.01330554,0.7700584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003386528,0.000104423176,0.0050504496,0.22464421,0.0032432214,0.00095509615,0.0011863934,0.00028247305,0.0005331205,0.005087826,0.7588116,0.0000673877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070188306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022099467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008340076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021554336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0108422125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03053093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2501602237","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.009","title":"Proponent-Indigenous agreements and the implementation of the right to free, prior, and informed consent in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Negotiation; Natural resource; Indigenous rights; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Informed consent; Environmental ethics; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Environmental planning; Human rights; Geography; Social science; Ecology; Archaeology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0061349777150935,"score_gpt":0.2594655220015167,"score_spread":0.25333054428642315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2501602237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05566884,0.16169368,0.0043365997,0.25050998,0.003570334,0.0010953927,0.00113329,0.000115905095,0.52187604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7322089,0.09427717,0.008052745,0.08601004,0.000748012,0.0006438711,0.00049302896,0.00010040161,0.0774658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9246236,0.012801703,0.004496596,0.0032717378,0.04217283,0.012633549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8935605,0.0496297,0.003552457,0.0033834449,0.045407116,0.0044666794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0500446,0.00057394226,0.0012612153,0.004131609,0.013557315,0.012496006,0.00645638,0.010857457,0.0045700446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08825816,0.0010477653,0.0009957957,0.005775261,0.017557682,0.0034761226,0.0049219057,0.010982467,0.00029876118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000133973,0.000091703914,0.0034856377,0.0023246803,0.00015811731,0.00090750225,0.015859235,0.0020942779,0.0006021955,0.7896972,0.095901586,0.088743985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018056654,0.00010682014,0.019635921,0.00998745,0.0004660642,0.00030607122,0.013691598,0.0011617669,0.0019347988,0.050435424,0.9018093,0.00028430764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110963784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110963784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.52918106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80510235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513936713","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2016.04.008","title":"Meaningful and efficient? Enduring challenges to Aboriginal participation in environmental assessment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan; World Health Organization","keywords":"Confusion; Political science; Public relations; Treaty; Environmental planning; Business; Public administration; Law; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.017049631785415558,"score_gpt":0.3646486820540424,"score_spread":0.3475990502686268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513936713","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051302515,0.46823883,0.016375028,0.29115316,0.0068244603,0.00043136606,0.00023097577,0.00011810326,0.16532561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49686143,0.40865335,0.035511762,0.027835177,0.0040316186,0.0012116409,0.00030705953,0.0001869161,0.025401],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9312948,0.04769761,0.0032714033,0.0016912682,0.012706868,0.0033379933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9103548,0.052939888,0.005607682,0.0051175915,0.021493163,0.0044869287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.078072034,0.0005218765,0.0014561518,0.0019098032,0.0050679045,0.013302667,0.0040949383,0.004944292,0.004955685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08254046,0.00060530734,0.0009086061,0.0029508926,0.009272774,0.011487068,0.007201441,0.0070964084,0.0010154615],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013641546,0.0002605384,0.0049109287,0.012504691,0.00027487465,0.0005467685,0.06732831,0.0005811227,0.0016404524,0.10672899,0.03348036,0.7716065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053901556,0.0002307109,0.015999235,0.033725284,0.00034219868,0.00059201906,0.09373806,0.00042294155,0.0012490641,0.05263578,0.8009113,0.000099555116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07615359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2204502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078072034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056521823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06408062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4128893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903295555","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2018.10.003","title":"Can groundwater vulnerability models assess seawater intrusion?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"International Development Research Centre; American University of Beirut","keywords":"Overexploitation; Groundwater; Saltwater intrusion; Environmental science; Vulnerability (computing); Salinity; Seawater; Hydrology (agriculture); Urbanization; Water resource management; Mediterranean climate; Vulnerability assessment; Groundwater flow; Aquifer; Geology; Geography; Oceanography; Ecology; Geotechnical engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.026817040564545265,"score_gpt":0.2940756416453896,"score_spread":0.2672586010808443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903295555","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1148508,0.44606993,0.29964927,0.053687394,0.0037061765,0.00026932912,0.008815799,0.0021371122,0.070814215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61805415,0.326255,0.044820584,0.0021187093,0.0008540244,0.00020612295,0.0019454964,0.00024283443,0.005503085],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999684,0.000108847766,0.000025502792,0.000054896813,0.000092205126,0.000034574914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980331,0.0011891923,0.00017396892,0.00010475206,0.00044949533,0.000049499355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022041595,0.0013190887,0.0009712957,0.0023634892,0.00018461126,0.0016708721,0.0012794586,0.0009793004,0.002816952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072998707,0.00030722507,0.0011238316,0.0018161287,0.00070522144,0.0045914394,0.000956432,0.00098626,0.0005781088],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078841615,0.00009904253,0.020761361,0.0029102268,0.0013357404,0.000108597626,0.0001653448,0.22505149,0.0013510289,0.057398036,0.03176073,0.6589796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005455755,0.0002958207,0.019869808,0.006518177,0.0019650068,0.0003915177,0.0014560207,0.29368958,0.0036226287,0.4178811,0.2539848,0.00027091953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013974365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018958084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013974365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001223263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001326026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027786076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913587515","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2019.01.002","title":"Assessing the effects of a Canadian-Mongolian capacity building program for health and environmental impact assessment in the mining sector","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Canadian International Development Agency","keywords":"Photovoice; Environmental justice; Indigenous; Health impact assessment; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Economic Justice; Race (biology); Political science; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Environmental planning; Economic growth; Public health; Geography; Ecology; Gender studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.015155679398802836,"score_gpt":0.3232268243151618,"score_spread":0.30807114491635895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913587515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6716999,0.21776594,0.0031276091,0.025074968,0.00084082544,0.0017984586,0.002332944,0.00012377469,0.07723553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413999,0.04882482,0.0033578072,0.0016315379,0.00006312764,0.0001786168,0.0007329863,0.000009276662,0.0038019395],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960407,0.0011814628,0.00010443852,0.00014452415,0.0014362277,0.0010925576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940356,0.0012614384,0.0006411047,0.00011412072,0.0030829043,0.0008649348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078093386,0.0005679969,0.00035990542,0.0012405621,0.0011494457,0.0015699047,0.0019808996,0.0008149577,0.0011069867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006229975,0.00014734534,0.00076537684,0.0019747843,0.0006847375,0.0006081632,0.001315314,0.0007621621,0.000059727205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014923704,0.0015517339,0.10267624,0.014108988,0.0024675194,0.00040551534,0.0021784029,0.050023258,0.005004126,0.026631635,0.02463692,0.7688233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058106176,0.0028214431,0.763834,0.01152385,0.0040567685,0.0002184864,0.009157265,0.014787916,0.0066807475,0.0027802822,0.18336318,0.00019510576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91917986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96661323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08082014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039557416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12988514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28701043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987299426","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106320","title":"Methodological pluralism in environmental impact prediction and significance evaluation: A case for standardization?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Standardization; Terminology; Predictability; Management science; Process (computing); Pluralism (philosophy); Discretion; Context (archaeology); Process management; Scrutiny; Computer science; Political science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Engineering; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06651358748007981,"score_gpt":0.4290182377034952,"score_spread":0.3625046502234154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987299426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049684294,0.31875786,0.11287977,0.53282,0.01742181,0.0003519443,0.0001604259,0.00028773973,0.012352001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27989247,0.18466829,0.22372982,0.2756425,0.029904334,0.0023192824,0.0003601144,0.000821749,0.002661462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.543191,0.30792874,0.06221333,0.021231493,0.060141057,0.0052943802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26152402,0.5596285,0.02247442,0.08088685,0.07144466,0.0040415297],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5674512,0.0017447526,0.007445123,0.012190813,0.006260382,0.02299022,0.014424786,0.016838266,0.0018461717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5567225,0.002057634,0.004571774,0.010075005,0.07203596,0.03789014,0.018753918,0.033230837,0.00056294946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014602236,0.000113425354,0.0018495389,0.011056948,0.0011638139,0.00014149708,0.013014827,0.0013097959,0.00050853647,0.7576424,0.029329097,0.18372406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001910565,0.00012876638,0.0020459709,0.024580361,0.0005627584,0.00034284467,0.005471301,0.0019106927,0.00057239796,0.81393707,0.15006967,0.00018716986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015043914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43254882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012925448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049292207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5334097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995868427","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106355","title":"Testing an ex-ante framework for the evaluation of impact assessment laws: Lessons from Canada and Brazil","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Lawmaking; Legislature; Ex-ante; Scope (computer science); Parliament; Political science; Process (computing); Impact assessment; Public administration; Law; Environmental planning; Public economics; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.051365553848756816,"score_gpt":0.4261873528508737,"score_spread":0.37482179900211693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995868427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16545917,0.035813224,0.048381623,0.1994528,0.001198317,0.002166262,0.003295059,0.0003100768,0.54392344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.942097,0.008897127,0.030567262,0.008621158,0.00018660582,0.00053959375,0.00053361175,0.00008546607,0.008472135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9518953,0.022242732,0.0020318457,0.0022792818,0.017605657,0.003945125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.803611,0.1030711,0.0053804903,0.008314985,0.0774415,0.0021810257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.095380016,0.0009630646,0.0014609616,0.0037390988,0.006154788,0.0109243775,0.0053861234,0.003508763,0.0038537888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17949541,0.0006691939,0.001219389,0.0049635945,0.008742929,0.008061725,0.0041782777,0.0064053657,0.00028732102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023549813,0.00020488336,0.0185818,0.0018414257,0.0005114842,0.0005350852,0.004233141,0.010459289,0.0010489961,0.8371511,0.025979908,0.09921742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012467472,0.0009357982,0.09309062,0.011793153,0.004709408,0.00049579766,0.022729376,0.053544056,0.007280474,0.44005498,0.36367404,0.00044563785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8859969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93849415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92002356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07997642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23373052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5802722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095187416","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106489","title":"Exploring bluewashing practices of alleged sustainability leaders through a counter-accounting analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Transparency (behavior); Sustainability; Sustainability reporting; Business; Content analysis; Sustainable development; Corporate social responsibility; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.11413935456068837,"score_gpt":0.35717337576599256,"score_spread":0.2430340212053042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095187416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92569494,0.008501355,0.0027639659,0.0067111296,0.00027229486,0.00016031359,0.00017792442,0.000035410303,0.05568255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97900873,0.006196604,0.0020577714,0.00078497414,0.000055732984,0.00007410848,0.00012369019,0.000011814521,0.011686465],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947772,0.002539989,0.00021437589,0.00024005205,0.0017998945,0.00042838496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664646,0.018863412,0.004596552,0.0007921754,0.008849374,0.00043386896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074716364,0.00020418952,0.0002024116,0.0038391247,0.0025224139,0.002387919,0.00074843364,0.0008143224,0.0017782934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02084999,0.00015940088,0.00020407817,0.0031691259,0.0010009888,0.0018257961,0.0013179535,0.0009440181,0.00025756992],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030608906,0.00036149577,0.1478472,0.0027862168,0.00018108958,0.0012884189,0.10135194,0.001218909,0.005554895,0.04566886,0.025250545,0.66818434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040209474,0.00079167343,0.30441043,0.0040191193,0.00050223875,0.0006152044,0.32400885,0.0038285074,0.013287436,0.007829189,0.3405298,0.00013720247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0165489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058937334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0165489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023344085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062195887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039514244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105883841","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106504","title":"The time is now to improve the treatment of biodiversity in Canadian environmental impact statements","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental impact statement; Environmental planning; Business; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.015025817879861797,"score_gpt":0.32755817086814576,"score_spread":0.31253235298828397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3105883841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055560605,0.35029486,0.01023567,0.4285145,0.021839928,0.00043948638,0.003913885,0.00054147426,0.17866406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10050505,0.6370301,0.054700665,0.12338272,0.0051907757,0.0003854668,0.0039827195,0.00047702083,0.074345395],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98163915,0.0019717084,0.0010022835,0.0005281864,0.013442511,0.0014161791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89256066,0.0106797395,0.0026196497,0.0014015076,0.08911561,0.0036228513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021804195,0.0012842854,0.0012400274,0.012409255,0.0064860196,0.008976946,0.0032311038,0.0025647068,0.015110822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055733737,0.00045836053,0.0017079243,0.020534324,0.004747353,0.0070288246,0.0032754475,0.0065669087,0.0014074665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034525216,0.00004283828,0.0029045604,0.0034188884,0.00014349513,0.00009861862,0.0011342082,0.001788043,0.0005218865,0.051895726,0.535008,0.40300918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102303575,0.000011403802,0.007869394,0.003168365,0.00011882604,0.000042266383,0.00092066376,0.00027641823,0.00016223142,0.006482675,0.9808748,0.00006281106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97747904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9403018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059698228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23728952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43314296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292074775","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106851","title":"A geospatial framework for the assessment and monitoring of environmental impacts of agriculture","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Soil and Land Suitability Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Geospatial analysis; Agriculture; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental impact assessment; Food security; Wetland; Watershed; Business; Environmental monitoring; Environmental science; Geography; Remote sensing; Computer science; Environmental engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.011512316508181688,"score_gpt":0.315495696485927,"score_spread":0.3039833799777453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292074775","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018814249,0.9016031,0.067716375,0.011339527,0.0009716004,0.0000917861,0.001033103,0.00023256759,0.015130483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03204445,0.90143645,0.06132123,0.0015653757,0.00084041967,0.0001359303,0.0011325657,0.00004923332,0.0014744229],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981476,0.0006332506,0.0001827456,0.00018131603,0.0007715429,0.000083607694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609214,0.0017387607,0.00043726136,0.00023954325,0.0013531891,0.00013917431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039826296,0.0014077981,0.0012627136,0.009381589,0.0005736877,0.0040538297,0.0027405496,0.0016994851,0.002099526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051587033,0.00050698326,0.00093942456,0.015167218,0.0027232429,0.004824259,0.0020320138,0.0021400098,0.00049882656],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034947752,0.00009858223,0.0020609584,0.00825754,0.0004076013,0.00017072352,0.00027886307,0.018485367,0.0015674772,0.31306422,0.042686783,0.6128869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011541011,0.00006252044,0.005274921,0.0076448573,0.0003237496,0.00037931235,0.0005797413,0.008603369,0.0006143955,0.12880927,0.84763306,0.00006332525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033576336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035426173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033576336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047116918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008161763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06676179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311968925","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107013","title":"Perceptions of change in the environment caused by the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for environmental policy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"COVID-19 impact on air quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"NOAA Research; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Consejería de Transformación Económica, Industria, Conocimiento y Universidades; European Environment Agency; Junta de Andalucía; European Space Agency","keywords":"Pandemic; SWOT analysis; Residence; Population; Perception; Business; Geography; Socioeconomics; Environmental health; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Demographic economics; Marketing; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.1413362009468957,"score_gpt":0.45739083739673914,"score_spread":0.31605463644984344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311968925","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026030103,0.8707808,0.00030493716,0.11403484,0.0024163718,0.000018520974,0.00021066653,0.0000061266105,0.009624702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036281154,0.94658685,0.00032953513,0.014884204,0.0012090706,0.000032096345,0.000120811106,0.0000046789173,0.0005515891],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946295,0.0024020132,0.00039168325,0.0003702742,0.001644263,0.0005622502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815028,0.010884259,0.0018748095,0.00014999892,0.004807962,0.00078025524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012186145,0.00053853536,0.0011453977,0.002660423,0.0010537358,0.0053876583,0.0011554841,0.0038165383,0.0045672734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021149956,0.00025924548,0.001244352,0.003699921,0.0025499044,0.0051518898,0.0022261017,0.0063687377,0.00034208188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028914213,0.00026306062,0.010450436,0.03829232,0.0011201111,0.0004049416,0.006789465,0.0028149532,0.00088795286,0.0742258,0.18697502,0.6774868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049736056,0.00023318389,0.033669714,0.06545077,0.0005920955,0.00035567733,0.027923664,0.0004507115,0.00054894126,0.02725036,0.8433034,0.00017173732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052614707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07397949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052614707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077273184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014673517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10461694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321465978","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107074","title":"Years late and millions short: A predictive audit of economic impacts for coal mines in British Columbia, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations; University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Audit; Revenue; Endangered species; Economic impact analysis; Credibility; Tax revenue; Business; Environmental impact assessment; Coal mining; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Economics; Habitat; Accounting; Geography; Coal; Public economics; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.009682173150149574,"score_gpt":0.28973786007472463,"score_spread":0.28005568692457505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321465978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62656295,0.11915571,0.0026089624,0.033644885,0.0010799585,0.0012860728,0.09938387,0.00045595327,0.11582158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8715274,0.067663595,0.0022732958,0.0022138725,0.00015565839,0.00017547404,0.019977095,0.000065591055,0.035948005],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972465,0.00017860836,0.00014378737,0.00009765598,0.0019889178,0.00034455382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98358613,0.0008913126,0.0010072365,0.00024423655,0.0135119185,0.00075910555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002619234,0.0005581846,0.0004589654,0.0055617224,0.0020571062,0.0028826883,0.0014565963,0.0006058692,0.0017798744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008887146,0.00036519518,0.0004034479,0.012271645,0.0007355245,0.00083599635,0.00092007115,0.0010019982,0.0002681623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038528268,0.00021425371,0.3381119,0.0032511593,0.0005313722,0.00049468776,0.0016621323,0.018394982,0.00068567076,0.0031539681,0.26397383,0.36914074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003849773,0.00008747544,0.84960896,0.0026649311,0.00029263058,0.00010548776,0.0040578786,0.005135315,0.00065522233,0.0007243498,0.1365134,0.000115851864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044865128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044865128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14361666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3255208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327546096","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107084","title":"Influence of government attention on environmental quality: An analysis of 30 provinces in China","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Environmental quality; Enforcement; Environmental pollution; Business; China; Quality (philosophy); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Public economics; Environmental economics; Environmental protection; Political science; Economics; Environmental science","score_opus":0.022870044560325688,"score_gpt":0.30077025252384487,"score_spread":0.27790020796351916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327546096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99476224,0.0024601526,0.00009407589,0.0004203949,0.000012733948,0.000009941706,0.0005883689,0.000009401431,0.0016428021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982628,0.0009380399,0.000029569801,0.00003834058,0.000006383256,0.0000029808612,0.00029456333,0.0000017176941,0.00042550638],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896896,0.00014083767,0.000076276505,0.00011134783,0.00027702568,0.00042558834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784696,0.0003689847,0.0005939109,0.000069996684,0.0007269456,0.00039319746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007301359,0.00032476513,0.000528175,0.002308813,0.0007375688,0.0014306982,0.00052065,0.00032818105,0.0013085222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014779065,0.00026349872,0.0011208012,0.0053694146,0.00071503274,0.0005013016,0.00090821314,0.0003546711,0.00008741051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094977986,0.00006785318,0.98517203,0.00016623562,0.00065434084,0.00042240045,0.0006381932,0.0024159914,0.00023446715,0.00080434186,0.00095929176,0.0083698295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008497061,0.000021189915,0.9963909,0.000020669502,0.00019812798,0.000025598361,0.001038563,0.0010514522,0.000074154785,0.000075398595,0.0010845228,0.000010786377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6771846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7603961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6771846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007136337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010505411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6494331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361027019","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107096","title":"Comparative eco-efficiency assessment of cybersecurity solutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Green IT and Sustainability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Carbon footprint; Life-cycle assessment; Footprint; Ecological footprint; Computer security; Environmental economics; Computer science; Greenhouse gas; Production (economics); Sustainability; Economics","score_opus":0.026963731766605537,"score_gpt":0.3541837193254428,"score_spread":0.32721998755883724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361027019","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028446266,0.8888595,0.008010659,0.002483973,0.00048063815,0.00016328057,0.0004871446,0.000036765872,0.07103182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22543524,0.7602862,0.008322641,0.0006685131,0.00033608955,0.00014964404,0.0008058803,0.000043656182,0.003952106],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954496,0.0015449547,0.00036861096,0.000259061,0.0021642684,0.00021356263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864096,0.0074082445,0.0011422656,0.0004894711,0.0044210986,0.00012925759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075896257,0.00095487136,0.0013153014,0.011706358,0.00039185604,0.0033862463,0.001376336,0.0008648489,0.004704736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012663643,0.00031826948,0.0017446497,0.009365406,0.00067183626,0.003926826,0.001123914,0.0008742328,0.00052999577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034739583,0.00030907503,0.0034284713,0.024544284,0.0018816605,0.00006138094,0.00017350208,0.012110526,0.0025242623,0.054722734,0.009078539,0.8908181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019263396,0.0041959784,0.062079478,0.056936003,0.010097981,0.00068941596,0.003148294,0.01661541,0.016181037,0.059730664,0.76992667,0.00020645608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004423791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010452102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011706358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039462163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032213465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040138245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361197654","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107088","title":"Integrating territorial pattern and socioeconomic development into ecosystem service value assessment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Tourism; Ecosystem services; Population; Geography; Land use; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Population growth; Service (business); Driving factors; Socioeconomic development; Ecology; Environmental science; Economic growth; Economics; Economy; Biology","score_opus":0.010615592479846434,"score_gpt":0.29499555038304764,"score_spread":0.2843799579032012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361197654","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008609869,0.95168066,0.011519685,0.007413335,0.0010367885,0.0000774805,0.0005202427,0.000038438426,0.019103505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09141379,0.8913064,0.013122361,0.0009598643,0.0006118119,0.00009313608,0.0005144993,0.00002862708,0.0019494504],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979184,0.0006413297,0.00025794675,0.00016883618,0.0009077215,0.00010585861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987615,0.008261575,0.000894754,0.00022671973,0.002873709,0.00012819443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064517143,0.0009570126,0.0014690169,0.0064332304,0.00035346538,0.002583418,0.0011829918,0.0011167378,0.0025016705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016992867,0.0003839903,0.0012499682,0.007711003,0.0012924321,0.0036700708,0.001426063,0.001554652,0.0004075863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028977265,0.000070919705,0.010481618,0.008756038,0.0010357029,0.00007105713,0.00016558712,0.006738272,0.00028696473,0.031620793,0.013327859,0.927416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004575112,0.0002961707,0.0835955,0.065572724,0.003993088,0.0008360378,0.0024573572,0.023498455,0.0015063798,0.09897763,0.7190089,0.00021195151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040188245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.083412476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040188245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003465348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005671559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07990867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362637670","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107103","title":"Meaningful public engagement and the integration of climate considerations into impact assessment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Transformative learning; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Citizen journalism; Political science; Environmental planning; Political economy of climate change; Environmental resource management; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Economics; Environmental science; Politics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.04184529934088777,"score_gpt":0.3827856475399,"score_spread":0.34094034819901226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362637670","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048061577,0.5561742,0.03767801,0.25991377,0.00909128,0.00028338883,0.00018554844,0.00015414578,0.13171355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29594353,0.57214576,0.03140638,0.07634271,0.012043519,0.0013659972,0.00034213267,0.0001735164,0.0102364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9110101,0.05938122,0.0037488993,0.0022757293,0.020178864,0.003405189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87350804,0.10147345,0.006805378,0.0039137364,0.012111506,0.0021879452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0752969,0.0015929594,0.0026244572,0.005226905,0.0027802216,0.014132509,0.0043096268,0.013359422,0.006880405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100453794,0.0008063475,0.0026969456,0.0048406916,0.015303488,0.017330943,0.013204773,0.0144477645,0.0011024778],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008133821,0.00034547088,0.001099167,0.011855659,0.00041216405,0.00026213087,0.002695655,0.0049561085,0.0006866077,0.5677587,0.04708157,0.3627655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048074544,0.000121653706,0.0022114553,0.020843226,0.00027631767,0.00019243704,0.0032257717,0.0011384421,0.0005448765,0.510068,0.46124658,0.00008311639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058934432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012295631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0752969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066077164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030472301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39821285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365505924","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107109","title":"Chronic sleep disturbance among adult Canadians: Associations and implications to the evaluation of noise impacts under Canada's Impact Assessment Act","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Noise Effects and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Annoyance; Sleep disorder; Anxiety; Noise (video); Medicine; Depression (economics); Logistic regression; Environmental health; Traffic noise; Disturbance (geology); Mental health; Demography; Audiology; Insomnia; Psychiatry; Noise reduction; Biology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.03573865009588665,"score_gpt":0.4434417048308092,"score_spread":0.4077030547349225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365505924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842104,0.002852779,0.00008678164,0.00157859,0.00004951837,0.0000970011,0.0055516628,0.0000129139435,0.0055603716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99609417,0.0014563488,0.00012583187,0.00019312253,0.000020845939,0.000024101451,0.0016073291,0.0000030795622,0.00047508455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989222,0.000094516705,0.000099247256,0.00008288339,0.00052831933,0.00027287152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961086,0.00019418912,0.0009374021,0.000062599494,0.0017881088,0.0009092139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012262325,0.0002761279,0.00027875078,0.0018966392,0.0021660824,0.0012482272,0.0010850364,0.0004687555,0.0014935284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034143087,0.00020960331,0.00059143634,0.0041150576,0.0005860994,0.00029916508,0.0007503197,0.0006354619,0.000112859016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004130437,0.000023995335,0.9937297,0.000049143848,0.000024891118,0.00004289703,0.00044853438,0.00002817678,0.000034456734,0.000032114913,0.0011448009,0.0043999483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016719325,0.000008402248,0.99885106,0.000024388393,0.000006766234,0.000017146453,0.0007566698,0.00005730166,0.0000049831256,0.0000053340495,0.00026331402,0.000002940353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013357185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013357185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017425366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096913636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376651516","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107144","title":"Quantifying the drivers of CO2 emissions across Canadian communities using quantile regression","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Per capita; Greenhouse gas; Quantile regression; Quantile; Population; Environmental science; Consumption (sociology); Poverty; Geography; Natural resource economics; Econometrics; Economics; Economic growth; Demography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.16699258380116205,"score_gpt":0.4628437387106421,"score_spread":0.29585115490948005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376651516","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22086172,0.61576116,0.07412679,0.01949898,0.0010933388,0.00052155025,0.029415524,0.00061510806,0.038105924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6375428,0.33309653,0.014626065,0.0008350547,0.0002167028,0.00013569155,0.008760897,0.00009531209,0.0046910653],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862254,0.000233823,0.00005454087,0.00020087737,0.00063203776,0.00025622942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964478,0.0009920438,0.00023078921,0.0001360269,0.0021144524,0.00007875013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004546612,0.0011488365,0.0008566415,0.0039001983,0.00079224276,0.0019216404,0.0016672178,0.0005695229,0.002063318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007359831,0.0003647943,0.002178443,0.009796329,0.0006173792,0.0011632505,0.0008510169,0.0014656795,0.00015451034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021861645,0.000091968344,0.19617076,0.0053332835,0.005290637,0.00023879288,0.0007317243,0.13740629,0.0009984802,0.044019625,0.03446533,0.5750345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049310474,0.00008191694,0.6648151,0.00464129,0.0036840944,0.00017226188,0.0023382583,0.101929635,0.0018623997,0.02103382,0.1990631,0.00032873827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97458726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97352207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025412738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018862678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022098733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13685894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378966693","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107162","title":"Utilizing the strategic concession behavior in a bargaining game for optimal allocation of water in a transboundary river basin during water bankruptcy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Riparian zone; Bankruptcy; Water scarcity; Resource allocation; Environmental economics; Drainage basin; Negotiation; Water resource management; Business; Water resources; Natural resource economics; Economics; Environmental science; Geography; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.024210414499011162,"score_gpt":0.29198010922195405,"score_spread":0.2677696947229429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378966693","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29115963,0.0010501337,0.68397504,0.0012763725,0.0001757366,0.00017901481,0.000040961368,0.00010164136,0.022041472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733792,0.00052082073,0.023798827,0.000064515894,0.000024307035,0.000049405375,0.00001433653,0.0000146965385,0.0021340477],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985185,0.0009373827,0.00004971664,0.00012451352,0.00021112303,0.0001586118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975171,0.0018419735,0.00019156316,0.00007073737,0.00027146682,0.00010712189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003916583,0.00067135715,0.00083905767,0.0006198345,0.00055380433,0.0014064622,0.0014748543,0.0014556083,0.0015820467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006401149,0.000519007,0.00078378007,0.0006068381,0.0015790842,0.0021695017,0.0006800324,0.0013820213,0.000113190756],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014882562,0.00016618207,0.0021269275,0.00014516363,0.000113228234,0.00016625071,0.00013787927,0.86423564,0.0045212083,0.09951541,0.0005811038,0.028142141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009454488,0.00007243572,0.00031039875,0.000013459545,0.00002063717,0.000022267313,0.000044509812,0.9855413,0.00048981194,0.013195464,0.0002669094,0.000013292996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066874833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008641233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066874833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016195748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026127594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02071309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380786143","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107183","title":"Cradle to gate environmental impact assessment of the Iranian forestry operations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Exergy; Reforestation; Global warming; Environmental science; Global-warming potential; Forest management; Business; Environmental economics; Forestry; Greenhouse gas; Agricultural science; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Production (economics); Climate change; Engineering; Geography; Waste management; Agroforestry; Economics","score_opus":0.012317481898841591,"score_gpt":0.35704689744696005,"score_spread":0.3447294155481185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380786143","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024648363,0.8552215,0.0051508294,0.028827494,0.0034008753,0.00020418529,0.000827365,0.00013688729,0.08158245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21261384,0.7619956,0.010207782,0.0037799731,0.0012625903,0.00008449278,0.0008982059,0.000029795498,0.009127683],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984303,0.00026782032,0.00009963565,0.00006589849,0.0010148536,0.00012144794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962387,0.00069951767,0.00038139353,0.000054600354,0.0024909265,0.00013490782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038548892,0.00076176017,0.00057296176,0.004003918,0.0006479446,0.002437871,0.0012663847,0.000814615,0.0032790909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038928436,0.00017638016,0.00072232436,0.0031671005,0.0005605245,0.002405203,0.000865663,0.0017389827,0.00038705269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009705641,0.00010600338,0.0036836597,0.007550631,0.00024274737,0.00018095625,0.0002257546,0.0036405562,0.0010814712,0.011866999,0.04350435,0.9278198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032280335,0.00032086065,0.03769027,0.021216052,0.00073687715,0.0002603722,0.0031443613,0.0024280762,0.0018804332,0.012062534,0.92016554,0.000062413455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06543721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14626904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06543721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035695713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014221062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13011265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381801815","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107191","title":"A roadmap for multiple stressors assessment and management in freshwater ecosystems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Stressor; Environmental resource management; Adaptive management; Temporal scales; Conceptual framework; Computer science; Ecosystem; Conceptual model; Ecology; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental science; Business; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.01941084247928715,"score_gpt":0.3322000792716203,"score_spread":0.31278923679233317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381801815","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053916586,0.94398355,0.009392054,0.03743081,0.0024191812,0.00034978855,0.00037532023,0.00027802162,0.0052321805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055174683,0.95045364,0.032938972,0.0075078504,0.0009864569,0.00048041786,0.0005361624,0.00002815672,0.0015508323],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956228,0.0014661016,0.0008054436,0.00044502248,0.001233241,0.00042739985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728987,0.013100374,0.002223001,0.0006412022,0.009593615,0.0015431412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025755294,0.002276189,0.00416399,0.00719881,0.0015877488,0.00591367,0.00439759,0.0053939535,0.008658152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01845347,0.0009037176,0.0030126486,0.0054100733,0.0021314137,0.00948798,0.0046299663,0.0062957373,0.0019172819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011498742,0.00030775077,0.0010767218,0.027071722,0.00030832272,0.00025907008,0.00027280967,0.0030971062,0.00094657496,0.021806149,0.06435051,0.88038826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000845249,0.00055305444,0.005005712,0.08204738,0.0011660522,0.00057796395,0.0012613772,0.002223711,0.0005056634,0.04420388,0.8622096,0.00016104229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031312134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042730227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031312134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006969961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050497707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13620865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386062600","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107261","title":"An applied framework to assess sustainability awareness and corporate misconduct considering just transition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Scrutiny; Sustainability; Stakeholder; Granger causality; Stakeholder theory; Business; Causality (physics); Sustainability reporting; Corporate social responsibility; Resource (disambiguation); Process (computing); Public relations; Economics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0999761128493054,"score_gpt":0.38422204982167224,"score_spread":0.28424593697236683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386062600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25275213,0.008707718,0.3251203,0.016189566,0.0010252731,0.006128023,0.0048478623,0.0005777097,0.38465148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8935037,0.0015362983,0.086929984,0.0010739291,0.00017863365,0.002587852,0.0010159677,0.000030327186,0.013143256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820587,0.009630451,0.0010735064,0.0010122855,0.0049607214,0.001264311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96570563,0.015941847,0.0041154693,0.0009729719,0.012392297,0.00087172235],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019095989,0.00070912443,0.0008423569,0.022036241,0.0023651235,0.0064853956,0.0016828136,0.002059413,0.005537887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031072086,0.0003362122,0.0020513623,0.00881592,0.0038511374,0.00551126,0.0036218092,0.0015987325,0.00058939756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016351571,0.00054362894,0.12128781,0.0009767205,0.00072198245,0.00065528974,0.0049006483,0.016316267,0.0009408724,0.69363683,0.017415795,0.14244063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012289714,0.001702749,0.17763212,0.0019586536,0.0014174469,0.0015229813,0.024425048,0.11098626,0.002775496,0.5620973,0.11499593,0.00036306537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026446499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034903437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007454947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013482627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100990415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387763233","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107317","title":"How to manage urban disturbances: Focused on social-ecological vulnerability to fine dust pollution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rural Development Administration; National Research Foundation of Korea; Ministry of Education; Korea University; CHEO Research Institute","keywords":"Pollution; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Pollutant; Environmental protection; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.044686896358114944,"score_gpt":0.35235667224192146,"score_spread":0.3076697758838065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387763233","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058849895,0.9940644,0.0005264555,0.00286301,0.00036417332,0.000012520017,0.000025722797,0.0000062791505,0.0015489083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062169493,0.99149007,0.0007211093,0.0008637473,0.00021940282,0.000013225526,0.000023157882,0.0000030269878,0.00044932924],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994357,0.00016129341,0.00008334382,0.00008400086,0.00016010996,0.00007541639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815935,0.0010098284,0.00024269232,0.000032526357,0.00047200965,0.00008356476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017929222,0.0008833804,0.0012657733,0.002004783,0.0003858285,0.0021456054,0.0011363243,0.0018995788,0.0022987067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026427738,0.00022189297,0.0008791844,0.0021887221,0.00089234003,0.0017408396,0.0011578033,0.0014460303,0.00034598415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005036384,0.0001148331,0.0012184518,0.03004028,0.0004535833,0.00010742164,0.00028230992,0.0027112686,0.0008921221,0.009542237,0.019287653,0.9352995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028195906,0.00027311876,0.008679113,0.051262006,0.0010297383,0.00040620324,0.0021786632,0.0011248265,0.00090666575,0.016089471,0.91794467,0.000077304714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010391202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027836854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010391202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015777143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047493204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020661473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390151370","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107403","title":"Re-grounding cumulative effects assessments in ecological resilience","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Cumulative effects; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Environmental planning; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.026803550939104026,"score_gpt":0.40078072925964797,"score_spread":0.37397717832054395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390151370","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01773248,0.3693016,0.47436914,0.03614186,0.0046387864,0.00067214365,0.0011116026,0.00057391403,0.095458515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5811378,0.208718,0.19599126,0.0055330573,0.0020929677,0.0006918647,0.0004958015,0.00027355886,0.0050656996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96944594,0.01782951,0.0023731135,0.0028481274,0.0069707134,0.00053252745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9023956,0.07250286,0.0045716395,0.008213114,0.011540917,0.00077585754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06256909,0.0020607265,0.0020400544,0.018474435,0.0013157079,0.0075693536,0.004283467,0.0023683559,0.0032791048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09782312,0.0006756062,0.002590988,0.008904152,0.015069549,0.018494505,0.010305766,0.0073723556,0.00044506142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046625646,0.000054068285,0.004256371,0.0063786926,0.0008543619,0.00015461519,0.0039568674,0.015731065,0.0004609928,0.65708524,0.005741497,0.30527958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022916505,0.00014997949,0.0059309923,0.015970564,0.00061316666,0.0002442318,0.00329037,0.007974498,0.0008907605,0.7581726,0.20656967,0.00017032641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016312812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020993445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06256909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009129614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00949837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33090097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392179569","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107465","title":"Automating building environmental assessment: A systematic review and future research directions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee","keywords":"Building information modeling; Cloud computing; Process (computing); Systematic review; Computer science; Data science; Automation; Sustainability; Process management; Engineering; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.027698114400597693,"score_gpt":0.4049360206293405,"score_spread":0.37723790622874276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392179569","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018516135,0.99889743,0.00018877408,0.00025299191,0.00012553102,0.00009041867,0.00009402744,0.000005502634,0.00016012632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021353615,0.99615663,0.00096625084,0.0004393017,0.000054728942,0.00010158281,0.000068025445,0.000003497463,0.00007469852],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99118304,0.0028258192,0.00286189,0.0007275915,0.0020990856,0.00030261112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9579225,0.030019483,0.0050298325,0.0007451479,0.005871448,0.00041150858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016473861,0.0017818004,0.0065325405,0.010231841,0.00068875635,0.0046711755,0.0024686991,0.0031441508,0.0051029623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04705201,0.0010587733,0.00673742,0.011012938,0.001273178,0.0046506757,0.0020535209,0.002028418,0.0007395701],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001011364,0.000046618516,0.00047320398,0.8409585,0.003242695,0.00008189806,0.00023202892,0.00023049631,0.00029239376,0.00068830285,0.00416491,0.14948782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001481596,0.00016574394,0.002664101,0.88244754,0.030198622,0.00030385275,0.00067217206,0.00021108676,0.00023742153,0.001186509,0.08169677,0.00006794759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015348094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05872346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016473861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036353804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024299702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087123156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402900247","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107680","title":"Assessment of life cycle environmental impacts of materials, driving pattern, and climatic conditions on battery electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in a cold region","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Advanced Battery Technologies Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Life-cycle assessment; Battery (electricity); Environmental science; Cold climate; Fuel cells; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental engineering; Waste management; Engineering; Meteorology; Geography; Ecology; Chemical engineering; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.009423153716648645,"score_gpt":0.2920322827023917,"score_spread":0.28260912898574303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402900247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99445903,0.000057471163,0.0030729433,0.00004360728,0.0000034785412,0.00007499485,0.00079485343,0.000016530477,0.0014770695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976255,0.000053403106,0.001519897,0.000006891332,0.0000010788011,0.00002627489,0.00045931,0.0000039243464,0.00030373625],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965954,0.000087414635,0.000010736921,0.00005265966,0.000069386035,0.00012025487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964046,0.00011831351,0.00006525175,0.00002120504,0.000111547284,0.000043139262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094776443,0.0008485783,0.00035600038,0.00095399877,0.00040297757,0.00084981025,0.0006437126,0.0006127756,0.00066868355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006905158,0.00030138774,0.0014301384,0.00078201375,0.00045663246,0.0006107981,0.00062957045,0.0003213143,0.000077239296],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021778274,0.00019887107,0.15493515,0.000085204796,0.000279784,0.00047744147,0.00013382435,0.8253578,0.009465828,0.0013189034,0.000266702,0.007262718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003251321,0.0005685176,0.2606138,0.000023206007,0.0002183501,0.000086865104,0.0011291733,0.7293907,0.0054941424,0.0011382253,0.0012481459,0.000056391214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21984929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23598692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21984929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032762215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002189319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43713927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403247726","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107686","title":"Practices, events, and effects: Improving causal analysis with the geographic information from cultural mapping in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations","funders":"","keywords":"Geographic information system; Geography; Environmental planning; Causal analysis; Environmental resource management; Regional science; Cartography; Business; Environmental science; Risk analysis (engineering)","score_opus":0.009114482954020998,"score_gpt":0.3031389382680905,"score_spread":0.2940244553140695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403247726","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22042741,0.4966264,0.1399728,0.031503238,0.0011180728,0.0036318905,0.0057753595,0.00034226227,0.10060251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6910465,0.21813951,0.085244566,0.00079631206,0.00009992215,0.0012228168,0.001400837,0.00004888779,0.0020005798],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97987854,0.011337488,0.0014427089,0.0010251517,0.0055147763,0.00080129824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94173497,0.038268052,0.0037218053,0.001844822,0.013932102,0.0004982579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030348834,0.00074584165,0.001282008,0.012952298,0.0033884386,0.0060885204,0.0021612954,0.0007923968,0.002392093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08588051,0.00067011063,0.0018642703,0.02919087,0.004170082,0.0033875965,0.0043001636,0.0016080415,0.0000883768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012073657,0.00008277173,0.082085565,0.029549055,0.0019854591,0.0004143733,0.031638186,0.010148285,0.00019349571,0.077175006,0.0077255378,0.7588815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016549263,0.00023580405,0.40310445,0.08471401,0.0077235596,0.0004881703,0.064557135,0.028545609,0.0012956923,0.110913925,0.29776645,0.0004896432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9378451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9606613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06215489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043695774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12563053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31703657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403870824","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107704","title":"How centralizing environmental enforcement affects water quality: A quasi-experiment in China","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Enforcement; Environmental quality; Quality (philosophy); Water quality; Environmental science; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental engineering; Environmental economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Ecology; Physics","score_opus":0.03338514948964436,"score_gpt":0.38971477789443404,"score_spread":0.35632962840478966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403870824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99928766,0.00002748279,0.00018155033,0.00005852448,0.000014865439,0.0001382232,0.00003106312,0.000004190695,0.0002564133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704546,0.00008656293,0.00060282997,0.000167317,0.000016491955,0.00053508696,0.0000929017,0.0000036427123,0.0014495687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976151,0.0010011533,0.000116752075,0.00059447414,0.00019819611,0.0004742753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547595,0.0016029365,0.00089691393,0.00067956507,0.000493185,0.0008514216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005821364,0.0006902928,0.0010118767,0.00043432694,0.0026718876,0.000993636,0.0014121918,0.0012700557,0.0051975152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036384696,0.0006745884,0.001213329,0.0006558391,0.0030517334,0.001045462,0.0007265284,0.0011946321,0.00035887104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.055940416,0.25516415,0.45289764,0.0028563223,0.004924627,0.0017470684,0.026650717,0.014474851,0.05747246,0.013055926,0.006400129,0.10841577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013524627,0.12690195,0.8036519,0.00017356346,0.002988303,0.000100321864,0.0136749195,0.020429272,0.009225343,0.0041511497,0.004788958,0.00038964057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07503409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12097548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07503409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039846613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006436032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14919466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404997588","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107738","title":"Does jurisdictional siloing increase or undermine the efficiency and efficacy of next-generation IA in federalist states? A Canadian example","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Manitoba; Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Federalist; Political science; Public administration; Environmental science; Law","score_opus":0.03162637189085239,"score_gpt":0.3379144581314524,"score_spread":0.3062880862406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404997588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099242344,0.058235753,0.009638007,0.21526851,0.0016459525,0.00044717075,0.001135175,0.0002177585,0.6141693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8943765,0.0385748,0.008881978,0.034408778,0.00033046686,0.00016634676,0.0003558929,0.00007649254,0.022828607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896965,0.0024765225,0.00025835025,0.0005195781,0.0040887436,0.002960289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97406447,0.008257464,0.0010852616,0.0010098336,0.014211091,0.0013719313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019090291,0.00039480196,0.000556068,0.0031712973,0.006372212,0.006088114,0.0026491764,0.0021515898,0.0048421226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029765218,0.00025006727,0.0011880096,0.004408874,0.007034751,0.0031128873,0.002705483,0.0034559334,0.00028811267],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023627719,0.00018123907,0.021920819,0.0015339364,0.0002568337,0.00053544185,0.0044073155,0.0072266045,0.0012690097,0.66105205,0.074183024,0.22719745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002680485,0.00040843678,0.07897103,0.0055037704,0.000964165,0.00040160478,0.01728195,0.006005341,0.0031190128,0.10382719,0.78306055,0.00018898545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96012366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9858088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94247586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057524163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13832635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41736895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405458050","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107780","title":"Understanding the role qualitative methods can play in next generation impact assessment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Impact assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Management science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.19911863085877118,"score_gpt":0.504944704191645,"score_spread":0.30582607333287387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405458050","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018420452,0.094738856,0.62545234,0.19634868,0.004006467,0.005709509,0.00067457557,0.00038865537,0.054260563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33251694,0.07783424,0.53927374,0.030675145,0.0008920136,0.014220237,0.00026742878,0.00023243969,0.0040878695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5566049,0.41606233,0.00787028,0.003555657,0.013279937,0.0026268766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3227506,0.6384227,0.009079312,0.010235118,0.01812881,0.0013834741],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.41358855,0.0015054317,0.0019184385,0.007587977,0.00765354,0.021296803,0.0045705265,0.0055689528,0.0050586835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35163987,0.0016143257,0.002303359,0.0077837133,0.026000084,0.029007357,0.0118187,0.007492741,0.0009888578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013673602,0.00011598937,0.0034135368,0.024935476,0.00022617262,0.00067479897,0.3475726,0.0024653422,0.0016940688,0.40614694,0.00905968,0.20355858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007347672,0.00017630875,0.0015472061,0.052501883,0.00018397556,0.00061056984,0.23724048,0.0025223733,0.0016795436,0.47634545,0.22689073,0.00022804561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011292731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01660599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5864115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017140852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033701092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7231497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406722414","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107819","title":"How to promote sustainable recycling of plastic packaging waste? A study combining machine learning with gaming theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Municipal Solid Waste Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Plastic waste; Waste management; Sustainable development; Engineering; Business; Environmental science; Architectural engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.008379503701202336,"score_gpt":0.29475438564589806,"score_spread":0.28637488194469574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406722414","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19676638,0.6841099,0.018970259,0.01659428,0.00069296744,0.00023296816,0.00011835879,0.000060621715,0.08245418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5626889,0.42102695,0.009570947,0.0014162442,0.00013956688,0.00008719509,0.00007334115,0.000011312797,0.0049854745],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991511,0.00044610898,0.000041497093,0.00006851717,0.0002212238,0.00007161437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977367,0.0018093468,0.0001280546,0.00003086222,0.0002481414,0.00004683375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016847389,0.00042986567,0.00039077818,0.001383653,0.00035678592,0.001983199,0.00063343474,0.0007381436,0.0013446452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029415314,0.000097926866,0.0005180622,0.0018928563,0.00058547605,0.0016930278,0.0004794503,0.0007628989,0.00014808253],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008734915,0.0003082782,0.003417719,0.008198443,0.00017683102,0.00006411496,0.00061442977,0.0046716887,0.0011454613,0.04228528,0.0029467903,0.9360837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012203431,0.0023451466,0.061719622,0.03985519,0.0023321486,0.0007137317,0.015936393,0.07661504,0.02184921,0.07185867,0.70640117,0.00025160555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011132953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024235317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011132953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016035348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028330996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02213633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407008235","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107843","title":"Vulnerability and behavioural avoidance of Golden Eagles near wind farms during the breeding season","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université de Moncton","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Fishery; Biology; Computer science","score_opus":0.009088566730304061,"score_gpt":0.2907233204041505,"score_spread":0.28163475367384644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407008235","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13939081,0.8558102,0.0002185892,0.000860447,0.00018872162,0.000011427559,0.00028320935,0.000005459841,0.0032311056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2305126,0.7673109,0.00035595286,0.0003116429,0.00025852717,0.00001557886,0.00029286125,0.0000044511803,0.00093745143],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997539,0.00006545423,0.00004199467,0.00004386832,0.00006380867,0.000031109405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901044,0.00044752788,0.00034742552,0.000015629877,0.00012293064,0.000056115656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000664465,0.00032506126,0.00047206655,0.0009479468,0.00014892848,0.00062719523,0.00035279783,0.00046939758,0.0005919464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016820416,0.00014947251,0.00057116675,0.0009876555,0.00022859233,0.00042225947,0.0004177375,0.0003745745,0.00007332123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056968274,0.00010187651,0.22676402,0.011128463,0.0025825982,0.00051428325,0.0007823671,0.0023030185,0.0017435882,0.000549555,0.0037840756,0.74917644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014239173,0.00034556392,0.9526353,0.00654157,0.0011451556,0.0011463998,0.0011166888,0.00033398552,0.0003425838,0.00050643523,0.03582888,0.0000432339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013478156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040279925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013478156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043367862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046904958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02679944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407275808","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107852","title":"Exploring influencing factors of health resilience for urban buildings by integrated CHATGPT-empowered BERTopic model: A case study of Hong Kong","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Hong Kong Polytechnic University","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Environmental planning; Environmental health; Architectural engineering; Civil engineering; Geography; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.1716560047397008,"score_gpt":0.5287375009827057,"score_spread":0.3570814962430049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407275808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953961,0.000118194126,0.0008366082,0.00016741532,0.000006080321,0.000062546,0.000042207805,0.000006333867,0.0033646135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981528,0.00013788504,0.0007245686,0.000013584827,0.0000010271626,0.000025366777,0.000021829817,0.0000012759372,0.0009216013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995919,0.00015832174,0.000015686623,0.00004103842,0.000042972883,0.00015002844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947137,0.00016978763,0.00007308515,0.000050020215,0.00009887902,0.00013693277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094594574,0.0003752833,0.00026977633,0.0006157594,0.0019464394,0.0017281069,0.00081936346,0.0004790152,0.0030372299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087677874,0.00018160744,0.0006140162,0.00075946207,0.0012592773,0.00092898705,0.0022429116,0.00051835336,0.00018391202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005040386,0.0027851972,0.7263707,0.0009891068,0.00038629211,0.010243979,0.11557354,0.017205657,0.004949264,0.028653227,0.0032964412,0.08904269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006377042,0.0014537275,0.55309,0.000615963,0.00058639614,0.0011534304,0.39061895,0.0264609,0.0021327562,0.003910577,0.019781351,0.00013221503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1126899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24584624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1126899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042146333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049878634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22406799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408130366","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107896","title":"Improving impact assessment efficiency: Connecting research and practice in times of change","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Environmental science; Process management; Environmental resource management; Engineering","score_opus":0.06329431160386026,"score_gpt":0.45980692559824077,"score_spread":0.39651261399438054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408130366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013092916,0.31636596,0.1437764,0.428781,0.0063625383,0.0008538625,0.00022516877,0.0006601579,0.08988206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40021443,0.31843397,0.2098118,0.056913096,0.0060611567,0.0018824154,0.00029826007,0.00050739304,0.005877446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.73386043,0.19657683,0.015472561,0.0106627885,0.03822491,0.005202497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5654773,0.33433276,0.019297726,0.027363911,0.048125282,0.0054030437],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22884579,0.0017408386,0.0037071437,0.012295967,0.0048525217,0.03306101,0.006076387,0.01018863,0.006363899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3432466,0.0016354284,0.001844532,0.012270593,0.030395348,0.053340066,0.02029899,0.013178763,0.0020685843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105667634,0.00022925234,0.005319795,0.013975421,0.0004435674,0.0001901167,0.018155245,0.0027362618,0.0005502589,0.26137972,0.028247757,0.668667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056750796,0.00034113534,0.006834944,0.028253334,0.00019887873,0.00041564516,0.02791833,0.0019533592,0.00087587663,0.5567348,0.37619722,0.00021960816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009694079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008772982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22884579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018738884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048493803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9509704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408541235","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107912","title":"A flexible framework for species-based regional cumulative effects assessments to support offshore wind energy planning and management","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Offshore wind power; Submarine pipeline; Environmental resource management; Cumulative effects; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Marine engineering; Wind power; Engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.040168983802006675,"score_gpt":0.43480852423232086,"score_spread":0.3946395404303142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408541235","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015622753,0.00013703758,0.9937775,0.0003709351,0.000025694633,0.000092948976,0.00036107868,0.00020530954,0.0034671521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10498812,0.000515702,0.8907738,0.00015269518,0.00007992286,0.0006087428,0.000959015,0.00018512346,0.0017369442],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973482,0.0013030262,0.00020359328,0.0004316067,0.00051844295,0.00019516662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963343,0.0017770379,0.0003989527,0.0003478875,0.0008323218,0.00030942666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007070113,0.001817874,0.0012808692,0.00361336,0.001331199,0.0037448192,0.0049332525,0.0020617878,0.006807016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011293701,0.0011161689,0.0029305806,0.0026695344,0.0018149465,0.003306237,0.0050224913,0.0027593304,0.00096835825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009541207,0.000029384333,0.0008320053,0.000081435384,0.00005684238,0.000115694675,0.0001027627,0.8582528,0.00041225564,0.12189569,0.0018176567,0.01639381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010648606,0.000024061354,0.0002529823,0.0000835251,0.000029452709,0.00004990047,0.00008759961,0.8720786,0.00016347416,0.11810186,0.009084416,0.000033565935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032618977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053939607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032618977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035814475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006039411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0648582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410055052","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107959","title":"Analysis of sustainability assessments to understand modeling trends and habits in the Agri-food industry: A Canadian case study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainability; Environmental planning; Food industry; Business; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Economics; Political science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.020211082579913525,"score_gpt":0.3582780309484383,"score_spread":0.3380669483685248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410055052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.854701,0.0075795995,0.025484571,0.005110529,0.00005879137,0.0006382693,0.0051545575,0.00030673746,0.10096601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626468,0.0048239245,0.021403693,0.00013907874,0.000010933726,0.00008995987,0.0017991699,0.00006306692,0.009023393],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978249,0.0004591655,0.00006944687,0.00013254072,0.001177683,0.00033626074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99512035,0.0010253896,0.0002698969,0.00014782885,0.0032606213,0.00017587938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039382684,0.0006751659,0.00037172335,0.0034820375,0.0016542131,0.0025542243,0.0012317876,0.00039991987,0.0017835202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064804633,0.00021806589,0.00082626514,0.006751052,0.0007872799,0.0012863544,0.00077033683,0.0006147197,0.00014046177],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029603238,0.00049257133,0.24022049,0.0013679968,0.00047488403,0.0007556207,0.0070432103,0.18376611,0.003360823,0.04463641,0.017790075,0.49979582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000477343,0.0003130144,0.5216221,0.0010234225,0.0005187969,0.00019070444,0.026044318,0.30065322,0.0046544215,0.016196743,0.12854634,0.0001892054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.966646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9839536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037931725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037931725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047736198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2752152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410974620","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108021","title":"Population abundance should be an Essential Biodiversity Variable in infrastructure impact assessment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Comunidad de Madrid","keywords":"Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Variable (mathematics); Population; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology; Environmental health","score_opus":0.011591114134298836,"score_gpt":0.351799139329189,"score_spread":0.34020802519489013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410974620","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016049957,0.8992133,0.04205781,0.009687194,0.0029696089,0.00036528014,0.0019360153,0.00018231613,0.027538434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17401089,0.7402414,0.06833491,0.0026726339,0.0022289287,0.0005204134,0.0022986585,0.00013345186,0.009558815],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978219,0.00095823366,0.00023428125,0.00031362707,0.00059472746,0.000077139746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99524397,0.0027434614,0.00054528227,0.00012497458,0.0012280779,0.000114272305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041779964,0.0010152545,0.0015809106,0.002540555,0.0003909544,0.0017996064,0.0013032983,0.0011665667,0.0036353043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008457315,0.0003045889,0.0010585019,0.0027363058,0.0008070874,0.003339593,0.00080297416,0.0013771428,0.001215139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000713047,0.0001191174,0.016864033,0.014199133,0.000830626,0.00016331633,0.00033043217,0.0031562808,0.0013601106,0.011612603,0.017104138,0.9341889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035056823,0.0006002603,0.08947553,0.033040226,0.0026120984,0.0010611276,0.0032149723,0.005222361,0.0030782823,0.038065586,0.8233066,0.00028788295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010130212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018425543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010130212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076761784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019885283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02209568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411046940","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108033","title":"Rethinking the semi-periphery: China's impact on global value chains and environment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Value (mathematics); Environmental planning; Business; Political science; Environmental science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.025908895300724672,"score_gpt":0.28270343970512896,"score_spread":0.2567945444044043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411046940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8043075,0.086378224,0.009229595,0.009623798,0.00023439436,0.000087575674,0.00018911745,0.000043608616,0.08990619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768142,0.020709947,0.0008943977,0.0002806826,0.000036471225,0.000016771555,0.00003871265,0.000003858915,0.0012049379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995809,0.00020532335,0.000014920855,0.00003821112,0.00008794792,0.00007274837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955684,0.00017721308,0.00007394487,0.000033984725,0.000119022436,0.00003885574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014653988,0.00030290292,0.00027809327,0.0009940483,0.0007171353,0.0019105823,0.00039228515,0.00046894274,0.0014091247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093652774,0.00007559105,0.00034020937,0.002024254,0.001693209,0.0021583831,0.0014938861,0.0006706201,0.000058928646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015239854,0.000105173895,0.04575577,0.0028762214,0.00028638073,0.0013585687,0.005644232,0.024068188,0.0041138725,0.48541826,0.0054997928,0.42472115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008498184,0.00072775973,0.28754988,0.004388953,0.0008599936,0.0006882561,0.011858826,0.049105242,0.0054802434,0.26138887,0.3776982,0.0001687389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022289028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032542437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022289028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00242303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029864188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044318616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411141664","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108031","title":"Assessing human health risks associated with wastewater flooding","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Climate Change and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Wastewater; Flooding (psychology); Human health; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Waste management; Water resource management; Environmental engineering; Environmental health; Engineering; Medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.1040736471257506,"score_gpt":0.46144405539508165,"score_spread":0.3573704082693311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411141664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98829216,0.00009828311,0.006408934,0.00025949278,0.000006221887,0.0001253287,0.0009737037,0.000043672717,0.003792145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710935,0.0001277088,0.0017844717,0.000019023664,0.000001914401,0.000048373644,0.00042805882,0.0000027478632,0.0004783477],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975854,0.00011898323,0.000012390382,0.000037820962,0.000036496873,0.00003578161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962187,0.00019907835,0.000047308033,0.000027714792,0.00007623935,0.000027710987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045055881,0.0004464947,0.00022490518,0.0005232166,0.00031374773,0.00070804945,0.00051199377,0.0008084999,0.00078827154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013669176,0.00022711047,0.00057515304,0.0005289463,0.00023298808,0.0005247674,0.00072648725,0.00022823278,0.00013241747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009496479,0.00015968017,0.1686486,0.000095521034,0.00011737282,0.0004344133,0.0002953493,0.81480324,0.0023064476,0.0015677367,0.00065073656,0.01082595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021118414,0.0004427087,0.11743554,0.00004406126,0.0000828744,0.00013567695,0.0021453458,0.87340295,0.0017459812,0.002797326,0.0016917483,0.000054696196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08028286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051040698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08028286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015612816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015692224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15963113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411299637","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108041","title":"Global patterns and mechanisms of decoupling municipal solid waste generation from economic growth","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Municipal Solid Waste Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Decoupling (probability); Municipal solid waste; Environmental science; Waste management; Natural resource economics; Biochemical engineering; Business; Economics; Engineering; Control engineering","score_opus":0.012870394975479834,"score_gpt":0.31815469837097465,"score_spread":0.30528430339549484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411299637","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028585589,0.9371179,0.003256686,0.012283375,0.0005391678,0.000029201512,0.00051114196,0.000059877337,0.017617058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.068808876,0.9280637,0.0013601321,0.00070566084,0.0001617334,0.000016195558,0.00019136786,0.000011317433,0.00068107434],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960536,0.00006024537,0.000048846472,0.00010379668,0.00009812344,0.00008373475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989159,0.00038430493,0.00038498908,0.00005745466,0.00021836912,0.000038997194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013810291,0.00055253715,0.0006165924,0.0023592948,0.00030811442,0.0022275555,0.0007381426,0.0007956094,0.0014798315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001734289,0.00029177507,0.00066239655,0.0063865143,0.0014718223,0.0028438575,0.0013365116,0.0015613344,0.00023503405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024186281,0.00005683928,0.017095182,0.0119738495,0.0008068032,0.00026309502,0.0005882684,0.00746812,0.0054280176,0.116090655,0.008945065,0.8310422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034733337,0.00034759715,0.12577547,0.011365501,0.0012965007,0.0007313984,0.003408644,0.0023015118,0.008094827,0.065511264,0.78099734,0.0001352328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011942459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02164642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011942459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027950332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037209627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023745894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412461461","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108071","title":"What does it take to stop a mine? Indigenous interventions and project rejection in Nunavut, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Psychological intervention; Environmental planning; Political science; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental science; Medicine; Ecology","score_opus":0.011717443139826096,"score_gpt":0.3062803950135979,"score_spread":0.2945629518737718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412461461","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34022847,0.5783886,0.00063564937,0.028191967,0.00054464187,0.0005240278,0.0003941174,0.000021634161,0.051070906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7741371,0.21788283,0.0008881591,0.002944791,0.00006680704,0.00018339178,0.00015280084,0.000014812245,0.0037294084],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98925775,0.0048299013,0.00048271613,0.00044312957,0.0032738457,0.0017126884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803625,0.00858863,0.0022658028,0.00029001004,0.0070307916,0.0014622555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014871148,0.0004171493,0.0009514521,0.002330172,0.007022554,0.006002847,0.0029730164,0.0013108886,0.0014844884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021672154,0.0003230602,0.00051998394,0.0057854555,0.006997617,0.0012492089,0.0021431788,0.0019020756,0.000079323305],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009209736,0.0005835433,0.121870734,0.044401884,0.0013765893,0.0015549733,0.16838045,0.0031042811,0.0014771991,0.05146013,0.028297013,0.5765723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027095288,0.00054124754,0.32258847,0.06915934,0.002131413,0.0005941086,0.3131662,0.0013249398,0.0019997878,0.0036676484,0.28417093,0.00038492068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99220484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11257471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11257471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27945065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8167905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413424915","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108133","title":"Beyond carbon: An integrated LCA–MCDA framework for circularity measurement of ordinary and geopolymer concrete","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Concrete and Cement Materials Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Geopolymer; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Geopolymer cement; Carbon fibers; Environmental science; Waste management; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Mathematical optimization; Algorithm; Composite number; Fly ash","score_opus":0.020144669112468257,"score_gpt":0.3294952557121898,"score_spread":0.30935058659972153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413424915","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025262661,0.0011301592,0.9663135,0.00038193728,0.00003483362,0.0004597841,0.0003770853,0.00014516876,0.0058949008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4880358,0.00080905616,0.50869,0.00015483533,0.000033878878,0.00076757633,0.00043185372,0.000049401624,0.0010275911],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958788,0.002420486,0.00018474692,0.00047245665,0.0008304091,0.00021310303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977437,0.0012498208,0.00028783735,0.00012384738,0.00050249207,0.00009224047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063947313,0.0015794992,0.0013376349,0.004374226,0.0007148549,0.003151923,0.0019215681,0.0013279123,0.001698032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005833276,0.0008052779,0.0020470053,0.002943956,0.0015576844,0.0015552678,0.0024690349,0.0012752071,0.00016854248],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006163391,0.0001421646,0.0044512576,0.00043683336,0.00020420869,0.00018965344,0.00020256426,0.8831405,0.0023745159,0.065134704,0.000630137,0.043031856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010724076,0.000061663726,0.00083272316,0.000075365024,0.000040370163,0.000026403535,0.00015082472,0.96578485,0.00059231033,0.030277615,0.0021123837,0.000034809254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021779206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025783852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021779206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032163083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040188218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04330486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414115112","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108159","title":"Can global energy transition be possible with intergenerational equity in climate efforts?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Intergenerational equity; Climate change; Climate change mitigation; Global warming; Political economy of climate change; Equity (law); Subsidy; Global temperature; Runaway climate change","score_opus":0.048952380397819,"score_gpt":0.3492270209558211,"score_spread":0.30027464055800207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414115112","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17233264,0.29856107,0.03804827,0.23704806,0.0073809493,0.000094261886,0.0014479301,0.00015993482,0.24492696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9264692,0.054331873,0.0021523244,0.006210399,0.0016302962,0.000048964725,0.00024533365,0.000032511452,0.00887917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995016,0.00012573482,0.000021723443,0.00007334662,0.000116428615,0.00016120914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788517,0.0010915224,0.00031610538,0.00023680663,0.00031242296,0.00015798645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002923661,0.00026204836,0.0003840478,0.0007216099,0.00041498354,0.002379734,0.00079440675,0.0015483828,0.008237095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008731956,0.00014693761,0.00053951616,0.001104395,0.0019585926,0.007512124,0.0023783566,0.0023688718,0.00041196373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013086756,0.000076882454,0.008553285,0.0004505702,0.00015870774,0.00008276003,0.0001817741,0.0055550328,0.00011398285,0.7663461,0.00911332,0.20923665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004897462,0.00008789584,0.029983679,0.0014289998,0.00022085466,0.00014485273,0.0010410552,0.003842114,0.0004799854,0.83355695,0.12913801,0.000026568496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044811186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072225234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008237095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015321443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020672518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027555823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415699064","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108245","title":"Integrating participatory GIS, remote sensing, and explainable machine learning to assess forest provisioning services","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Remote Sensing in Agriculture","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University; David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future , Cornell University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre; McKnight Foundation","keywords":"Provisioning; Livelihood; Random forest; Geospatial analysis; Vegetation (pathology); Participatory sensing; Forest inventory; Citizen journalism; Index (typography)","score_opus":0.01618482653077884,"score_gpt":0.32225636245800643,"score_spread":0.3060715359272276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415699064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74099016,0.00036093532,0.25029778,0.0008930182,0.000019485444,0.00026492824,0.0014142279,0.0004943475,0.005265136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9422967,0.00006542104,0.056845613,0.000040027517,0.00000819048,0.000059123726,0.00041965963,0.000012157616,0.00025310356],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978096,0.0014592247,0.00009866521,0.00028281496,0.00024917003,0.000100555095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952167,0.0031497672,0.00067629624,0.00060436863,0.00028577802,0.00006708473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038922504,0.0006648353,0.00035378698,0.0020387948,0.00032711274,0.0011634374,0.00048277402,0.00041317486,0.0011868695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074413745,0.00024768186,0.0006227387,0.0013252976,0.000641642,0.0014394048,0.0013472448,0.00039651335,0.0001278468],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027471935,0.00045583074,0.2879455,0.00045310025,0.0008382723,0.00047968142,0.0034431564,0.3663453,0.0067143138,0.018027432,0.0012230534,0.31379962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031183066,0.00016342591,0.08006125,0.000085533924,0.00010157366,0.00011926794,0.0023105529,0.86795527,0.001976343,0.044336352,0.0028011107,0.00005804041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077858823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01413855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077858823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010448312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074094144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020584464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415983758","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108256","title":"A combined territorial life cycle assessment and ecosystem services valuation to analyse the environmental performance of coastal planning scenarios: Insights from a case study in southern France","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Fonds de recherche du Québec; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Valuation (finance); Environmental impact assessment; Strategic environmental assessment; Ecosystem valuation; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment; Life-cycle assessment; Goods and services; Damages; Tourism","score_opus":0.011003593424911735,"score_gpt":0.2999959083049042,"score_spread":0.28899231487999244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415983758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90286195,0.008020974,0.042937055,0.0016977494,0.000052374464,0.00018240084,0.0017385607,0.00016467717,0.04234412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800774,0.002423482,0.014220805,0.000055930203,0.00001482796,0.000055010074,0.0006317447,0.000035072135,0.0024856755],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917233,0.00043419361,0.000028063083,0.00006360204,0.00019730287,0.000104521976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987809,0.0006556701,0.00009593453,0.000063125444,0.00035231424,0.000051979387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026548405,0.00069071294,0.00055759726,0.0028235822,0.00046326022,0.0022998576,0.0006662431,0.00072569284,0.0016668243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023418774,0.00019981217,0.0009270797,0.0031539432,0.00036978506,0.0014491506,0.0006226909,0.0003840244,0.00015283725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016438581,0.00029320075,0.09557146,0.0006323851,0.00083568186,0.0010124227,0.00086695526,0.61087203,0.003578804,0.031698164,0.004663018,0.24981152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042515527,0.00044490013,0.13189693,0.00047809535,0.00056777615,0.0005768124,0.0035107257,0.80977696,0.0020282993,0.017181693,0.033366285,0.00012902587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10220854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15929672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10220854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003801443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028819279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20322728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417148520","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108219","title":"Life beyond the checklist: Revitalizing the potential of environmental impact assessments through co-creation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca; Beijing Normal University; Dipartimenti di Eccellenza; Università Ca' Foscari di Venezia; Università Ca' Foscari Venezia","keywords":"Work (physics); Process (computing); Vitality; Environmental impact assessment; Social impact assessment; Checklist; Impact assessment","score_opus":0.010904676736781768,"score_gpt":0.3764187312828413,"score_spread":0.36551405454605956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417148520","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076924427,0.4983468,0.09407305,0.30895156,0.017665807,0.0007045333,0.00094684423,0.0010144749,0.07060444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13968858,0.47197893,0.26922798,0.08928045,0.00879266,0.00218885,0.0018737282,0.0009203839,0.016048394],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8944065,0.07023824,0.006020225,0.0039363396,0.023779606,0.0016192016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61841244,0.25157672,0.015037018,0.026694234,0.0798602,0.008419387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1433252,0.0013892766,0.0021359397,0.0106333615,0.0020893854,0.014316458,0.008709009,0.0053031496,0.008340155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22543016,0.0007243117,0.0025307576,0.008530031,0.008791122,0.028561981,0.013259756,0.010671393,0.0022134115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120636476,0.00017885352,0.0014861766,0.011369246,0.0003486332,0.00014316347,0.002164834,0.0006580256,0.00058890355,0.10556201,0.06937994,0.80799955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010418944,0.00029140283,0.002456894,0.033689264,0.00048321843,0.00029799851,0.0020008343,0.0010404483,0.0007999464,0.088170506,0.87053394,0.00013138025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010418579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02151678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1433252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006482558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05557291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7579851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7082151852","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108171","title":"From laboratory to industrial scale: How to evaluate the carbon mineralization of cement and cement-based materials","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"China State Construction Engineering Corporation; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Cement; Mineralization (soil science); Carbon fibers; Carbon steel","score_opus":0.01983579112537377,"score_gpt":0.3063222745372535,"score_spread":0.28648648341187977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7082151852","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17848037,0.53320134,0.23482591,0.010758793,0.0029257922,0.0010614075,0.0043326183,0.0011410918,0.033272628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40872443,0.37952545,0.19195154,0.0033814532,0.000753977,0.00092834246,0.002111706,0.00034608052,0.012277033],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974929,0.00043375723,0.00013151417,0.00041410644,0.0014126827,0.00011502968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974178,0.00050408964,0.00028047984,0.00022714058,0.0014590352,0.00011137657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002648137,0.0011163423,0.0019291065,0.0019020648,0.00051440275,0.002794046,0.0018474294,0.0022810358,0.0011333558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025452431,0.00042751443,0.0012370074,0.0013982055,0.0017364648,0.0023865122,0.0012627292,0.0016270346,0.0010958497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022085235,0.00040402176,0.009692575,0.006539344,0.00034899142,0.0002674009,0.00017997135,0.004306903,0.53140014,0.0032191263,0.005566747,0.4378539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004904548,0.0015063402,0.03443677,0.0016140386,0.00090010575,0.0009200879,0.0010951576,0.010267138,0.7446,0.014089131,0.19028623,0.00023592963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008638374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020934459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008638374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013365237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038629728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01717621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7092588865","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108228","title":"Ecological restoration strategies towards environmental suitability and social equity on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society","keywords":"Restoration ecology; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem; Sustainable development; Equity (law); Environmental restoration; Social equality; Sustainability","score_opus":0.02681319705634773,"score_gpt":0.34539384350285546,"score_spread":0.31858064644650774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7092588865","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04688633,0.91751593,0.0015854454,0.011862184,0.0005881216,0.000058104168,0.00011201848,0.00003234934,0.021359447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28620136,0.7070274,0.0018528549,0.0016930642,0.00045350398,0.000059554357,0.00015748575,0.000009563774,0.0025452615],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952924,0.00017464743,0.000041462903,0.000031794832,0.0001283122,0.00009448399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939597,0.0001668519,0.000107204585,0.000012703941,0.00025058616,0.00006670745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002271963,0.0005881181,0.0005062912,0.0017728768,0.00076785416,0.0015119755,0.0010401886,0.00056966813,0.0015460455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014014856,0.00010245058,0.00040229442,0.002627401,0.0009104087,0.00096999964,0.0012684852,0.0007505206,0.00006838165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006633909,0.00009495235,0.010212614,0.008460775,0.0004456802,0.00025199188,0.0017303862,0.0052000606,0.00077979703,0.031565733,0.012141904,0.9290498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092564325,0.00057819334,0.16710232,0.03255784,0.001918808,0.0006325111,0.014022949,0.0077054515,0.0011972775,0.040513422,0.73357224,0.00010636728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06508838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1779296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06508838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036755444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008951798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12941909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}