{"meta":{"query_hash":"52ef3747d32c","filters":{"venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/52ef3747d32c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Erasmus+Journal+for+Philosophy+and+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W2564638719","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v8i1.192","title":"Joseph Heath's Morality, competition, and the firm: the market failures approach to business ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 424 pp.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Competition (biology); Business ethics; Management; Environmental ethics; Economic history; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.21469477831577857,"score_gpt":0.3396976699459399,"score_spread":0.12500289163016134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564638719","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014404798,0.9319519,0.00040683697,0.057669275,0.0025316782,0.000005118929,0.0000174362,0.000007592854,0.0072661643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014431894,0.91318274,0.0009510962,0.033970423,0.011786075,0.000038606595,0.00006179774,0.000036736088,0.025540642],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965244,0.0014570041,0.00018067245,0.00024290629,0.0013499331,0.00024500015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937145,0.0042642085,0.0005367744,0.00013604191,0.0007789803,0.00056954037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038451822,0.0012572388,0.0008793008,0.0038431752,0.001974614,0.0063062944,0.0018546333,0.007225139,0.007067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006182182,0.0008744381,0.0005808663,0.0041327514,0.011113028,0.011688453,0.00255922,0.009852959,0.0023205767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018066852,0.000029112784,0.00027087037,0.0011525041,0.000020673844,0.00010863025,0.0018599222,0.00021628481,0.00008079253,0.10753194,0.7955871,0.09312407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010985393,0.000018648328,0.0016388329,0.0040003574,0.0000093641165,0.00022749795,0.0012730008,0.00012894864,0.00006375054,0.081452265,0.9111491,0.000027321461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017216278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027343446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017216278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007135911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008856044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05177492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604356970","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v3i2.55","title":"Science and social control: the institutionalist movement in American economics, 1918-1947","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Positivism; Control (management); Social control; Social science; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Law; Management","score_opus":0.026507207705373407,"score_gpt":0.23327281951818074,"score_spread":0.20676561181280734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604356970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11381934,0.091222815,0.020857869,0.16771255,0.0016645456,0.00007430502,0.0001492168,0.000062007006,0.60443735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602948,0.015120384,0.0020158896,0.0041395687,0.0019085549,0.00007054643,0.000033398665,0.00002219829,0.016394671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824774,0.0008202911,0.000077361954,0.0002413232,0.0004103216,0.00020303938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766135,0.0016355901,0.00019890915,0.00013159183,0.00026964967,0.00010300609],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037954545,0.00033310722,0.00030843948,0.0021846532,0.0030776982,0.0040546325,0.00038325947,0.0019774823,0.0019142056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004921016,0.00021921682,0.00024159947,0.0020302518,0.031382646,0.0047824336,0.0020407157,0.0024931594,0.0001864555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006426184,0.0000067032365,0.00017406176,0.000008280013,0.0000023794755,0.000015973681,0.00070281554,0.00031255672,0.0000150500255,0.9929563,0.0013626623,0.0044368417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015741121,0.00001378754,0.0013855516,0.00008939947,0.000004868347,0.000027506201,0.00034002442,0.00056112465,0.00008346214,0.89061743,0.106848314,0.000012801053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01325605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008475027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015141795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046270844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10986191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604467122","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v6i2.132","title":"The relation between economics and theology in Caritas in Veritate","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Relation (database); Philosophy; Encyclical; Theology; Social contract; Economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.027896487889575206,"score_gpt":0.2723784143529833,"score_spread":0.2444819264634081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604467122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16279861,0.023102349,0.0036151959,0.042974945,0.00073444494,0.000019561416,0.000044336524,0.000036621313,0.7666739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801119,0.0014616754,0.0003296994,0.00072555704,0.00020681224,0.000014780534,0.000007350361,0.000011947118,0.017130325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919885,0.0004200213,0.00001248107,0.0000771557,0.00010830673,0.0001831652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924767,0.0004584097,0.00009642386,0.000042900847,0.00009009585,0.00006459944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009743525,0.00015285402,0.0001901042,0.0012560441,0.006047912,0.0049714856,0.0005370662,0.0013392874,0.003492507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013620323,0.00017908482,0.00010363203,0.0010374903,0.01958188,0.0017279447,0.0018041735,0.0018593594,0.00016494114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058428864,0.000005465306,0.0001670956,0.000011537746,0.0000010004193,0.00004613444,0.001733886,0.0001092011,0.000025877645,0.99418986,0.0011099881,0.0025941285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001714997,0.000034059492,0.0054167085,0.00018858303,0.000007044458,0.0001843792,0.0058527207,0.00068921887,0.00027529252,0.55927646,0.42803478,0.000023654886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01927472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025994549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01927472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011072368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040569594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080336034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604787241","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v6i2.134","title":"The oeconomy of nature: an interview with Margaret Schabas","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Erasmus+; Philosophy of science; Philosophy and economics; Natural philosophy; Natural history; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Economic history; Philosophy; Art history; History; Epistemology; Ecology; The Renaissance","score_opus":0.030688055453749828,"score_gpt":0.22442149959792723,"score_spread":0.1937334441441774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604787241","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06464612,0.0152434595,0.001243814,0.8782097,0.0018230918,0.000031649415,0.00006414478,0.000033098506,0.038704935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68821055,0.013859409,0.0013607452,0.23648877,0.0008213409,0.00017616471,0.000043016455,0.0001367249,0.058903344],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957885,0.0029059516,0.000069928086,0.00021583885,0.0004706313,0.0005491281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947141,0.0035101925,0.00023840064,0.000084884545,0.0005482072,0.0009042349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004838193,0.00035382394,0.0006659463,0.0010760629,0.017736815,0.0048339707,0.0012397498,0.006211462,0.00359316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008991179,0.00078824186,0.00030992602,0.001493168,0.0143456105,0.00723981,0.0036938884,0.017427439,0.0007038282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005753867,0.00006570013,0.0017239662,0.00009688907,0.000011151007,0.0014770841,0.68646103,0.0002630205,0.0008722104,0.073268145,0.22508939,0.010613879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062226177,0.000023623,0.0012503165,0.00033052065,0.0000053344943,0.00082513614,0.38812777,0.00018393497,0.00019982582,0.007536958,0.6014618,0.000048547303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062124364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099898525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062124364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00917282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062582907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12352556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605152060","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v6i1.118","title":"Early marginalist ideas on money: some neglected exceptions to the quantity theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Economics; Liberian dollar; Quantity theory of money; Keynesian economics; Endogenous money; Neoclassical economics; Relevance (law); Quarter (Canadian coin); Positive economics; Law; Monetary policy; Finance; Political science; History","score_opus":0.038681662724875304,"score_gpt":0.24169676499511097,"score_spread":0.20301510227023567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605152060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10106131,0.1160528,0.12497495,0.24494217,0.0026250216,0.00004366759,0.00014630376,0.00019659799,0.40995714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9266031,0.023184093,0.017336536,0.012515262,0.0053955647,0.000082591185,0.000042652944,0.00017078697,0.014669491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637306,0.0015265039,0.00015196943,0.0005256248,0.0011838683,0.00023906073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940189,0.003975504,0.0004278023,0.00062836794,0.0006962999,0.00025316674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006028066,0.00043635166,0.0007521656,0.0021726214,0.0032365231,0.0062645986,0.0019008376,0.0038856207,0.0027947726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013416832,0.00030860628,0.00042367127,0.0018941965,0.038428873,0.015256544,0.00598758,0.007995335,0.00052460533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003857211,0.0000019288327,0.000041472325,0.000014414616,0.0000010316107,0.000011968407,0.0006315298,0.000025925086,0.000015487058,0.9966454,0.00051615114,0.0020909149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027896008,0.0000047072026,0.000083486586,0.000039580314,0.0000012578934,0.000041255924,0.00024424025,0.00013959337,0.000036929734,0.98278713,0.016615393,0.0000036785527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012843987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011452335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062645986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035390768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013923204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031879842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605192060","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v1i1.3","title":"Are we witnessing a revolution in methodology of economics? About Don Ross's recent book on microexplanation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Methodological individualism; Epistemology; Individualism; Interpretation (philosophy); Agency (philosophy); Realism; Consciousness; Positive economics; Sociology; Behavioral economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.188760888940961,"score_gpt":0.28591091770637295,"score_spread":0.09715002876541196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605192060","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030830936,0.09785683,0.04086405,0.8239696,0.010925554,0.000017196817,0.00006450618,0.00012314656,0.023096012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3012397,0.16100548,0.07333624,0.3708653,0.05858048,0.0003845822,0.00015875162,0.0006674721,0.033762023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99203354,0.005055162,0.00024836845,0.0009548342,0.0014627283,0.00024533705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711084,0.024061432,0.0011301697,0.0012828308,0.0017910368,0.00062615355],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013518719,0.00067572336,0.0011309938,0.0019140835,0.0025204122,0.00760466,0.001289491,0.0051421258,0.0032379972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028161796,0.0003952303,0.0008386317,0.0018516964,0.02431902,0.020454247,0.0024239605,0.011896623,0.0011785581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032106836,0.000018965338,0.00027189468,0.00019971828,0.000025360065,0.00007392714,0.0015178408,0.00029642432,0.0001631926,0.91705644,0.057838954,0.022505216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000096502545,0.000014502865,0.00010725225,0.00017447153,0.000006794803,0.00010949346,0.0005284039,0.00032356934,0.00013834515,0.80898374,0.1895778,0.000026093136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012577483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013451619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023991903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019148918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0714947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904528701","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v11i2.332","title":"Wages, Talents, and Egalitarianism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Egalitarianism; Arbitrariness; Economics; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Economic Justice; Positive economics; Knight; Distributive justice; Neoclassical economics; Capital (architecture); Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.047756758432890706,"score_gpt":0.2379534513307446,"score_spread":0.1901966928978539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904528701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14665897,0.0059056054,0.016156927,0.06333946,0.0005405055,0.0000215789,0.000059708207,0.000054667893,0.7672627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978929,0.0006225005,0.0011356352,0.0019729978,0.0002842125,0.000014356664,0.000008884389,0.000015266376,0.017017197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825627,0.0007144523,0.000037310714,0.0002746088,0.0003763691,0.0003408973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857175,0.0006121212,0.00018991422,0.00025385668,0.00018517459,0.0001871795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024070677,0.0002668931,0.00030556996,0.0011080628,0.0033357304,0.0036032537,0.0007822731,0.0018762641,0.004191548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044577676,0.00012403444,0.00021948892,0.00083142915,0.023880698,0.0039752363,0.00264182,0.002940002,0.00048837333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039155916,0.000004211744,0.0000889567,0.000002449114,9.208489e-7,0.000005620687,0.0002975061,0.00009111663,0.000013132618,0.9974687,0.0003857023,0.0016378447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039703496,0.0000038643725,0.00034483397,0.00000760574,9.51312e-7,0.000007073722,0.00012542658,0.00013073807,0.000029786283,0.9929871,0.0063562253,0.0000023911693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043647396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033507165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043647396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035373685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001095329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025665522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905231057","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v11i2.326","title":"On the Very Idea of a Just Wage","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Compensation (psychology); Laziness; Economic Justice; Wage; Law and economics; Economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1067227142097358,"score_gpt":0.33835782747942555,"score_spread":0.23163511326968977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905231057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019974157,0.004998838,0.13951816,0.13431506,0.0024857554,0.000112469184,0.00019699465,0.00019726912,0.69820136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83500475,0.0026497939,0.03757747,0.031849056,0.0023129354,0.0005485254,0.0001183713,0.00035751789,0.08958164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99353117,0.0026070683,0.00022680161,0.0013140532,0.0017570069,0.0005638741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635255,0.0015936089,0.00035923716,0.0006569469,0.00066846434,0.00036911792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070471857,0.0007145392,0.0006111498,0.0014353346,0.004524141,0.009297904,0.0018798502,0.0072715394,0.010015131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109120235,0.00044210049,0.00074767665,0.0007657048,0.04771333,0.01320079,0.0049992027,0.01059119,0.002189142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036643564,0.0000030181582,0.000025031328,0.0000067510214,0.0000011874661,0.000004648271,0.00018873828,0.000051151295,0.000020270929,0.9977608,0.00092402904,0.0010107651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006756165,0.000012791039,0.00009214705,0.000041394025,0.0000022800873,0.000023550096,0.0001938994,0.00023660122,0.00005170416,0.96879613,0.030534854,0.000007785218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019560375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014141122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010015131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036521745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029101202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037269533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905335938","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v11i2.340","title":"On the Very Idea of an Efficient Wage","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Reservation; Economics; Microeconomics; Efficiency wage; Equity (law); Wage; Labour economics; Consumption (sociology); Competition (biology); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Social stratification; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04582609103490333,"score_gpt":0.2344471751540706,"score_spread":0.18862108411916728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905335938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018329885,0.005673762,0.36240336,0.056637455,0.0019574722,0.00011321036,0.00024735506,0.00017674112,0.5544609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8047327,0.0037915048,0.08086438,0.012274346,0.0032768834,0.0004928846,0.0001896291,0.00039098403,0.093986675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534553,0.0015234115,0.00023996252,0.0013402653,0.0011430817,0.00040776204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718696,0.0011034642,0.0002715955,0.00085207686,0.00041167412,0.0001742493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005872967,0.00068210426,0.0007685972,0.0012753912,0.0021976356,0.0060195467,0.0019363464,0.0045307926,0.008905208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009516973,0.0005211165,0.00085622695,0.00079670904,0.023911899,0.009219853,0.0031290161,0.007624388,0.0025431737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037860943,0.0000034473965,0.000029541738,0.0000071456716,0.0000021025733,0.000004383903,0.00007965794,0.00018035484,0.000024668172,0.997264,0.0005364616,0.0018643792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006401582,0.000010950296,0.000069323934,0.000024300112,0.0000024914466,0.000019808147,0.000047128833,0.0004310195,0.000054027907,0.9839145,0.015414137,0.0000060159327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012437713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005508694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008905208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023659011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015945876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031059563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284890194","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v15i1.617","title":"The Case of Stated Preferences and Social Well-Being Indices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Deliberation; Happiness; Paternalism; Positive economics; Politics; Preference; Social choice theory; Order (exchange); Social preferences; Public economics; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.1124874216597746,"score_gpt":0.3654072601664208,"score_spread":0.2529198385066462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284890194","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09430187,0.0016125981,0.75279444,0.025686216,0.00048201077,0.0003894616,0.0007594843,0.0001325931,0.12384136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8016799,0.0006342991,0.19023986,0.0016701949,0.00037932195,0.00096027605,0.00024280701,0.00007092065,0.004122418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9154978,0.067978136,0.0023603092,0.0049552754,0.0072014784,0.0020070828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82483506,0.13742457,0.012574184,0.016672116,0.006872326,0.0016217075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05657737,0.0012675854,0.0018131688,0.0026965751,0.0028120927,0.009337188,0.0021268213,0.004507458,0.0097476095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17527713,0.0007350571,0.0017955689,0.0055241096,0.01242186,0.017279314,0.0063794767,0.008544019,0.0008217268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007667152,0.000037550686,0.0020623219,0.0000926773,0.00006758299,0.000104074956,0.0013534315,0.003075051,0.00008386105,0.97535455,0.0007858286,0.016906347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021082566,0.000030819454,0.00066950585,0.00005419903,0.000018357508,0.00006736435,0.00045333273,0.011703236,0.00012988312,0.98345196,0.0033773321,0.000022858643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025160294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017572966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05657737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035946271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019087982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2992133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389514690","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v16i2.800","title":"Anodyne Privatization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Phenomenon; Unitary state; State (computer science); Supporter; Law and economics; Object (grammar); Set (abstract data type); Welfare; Business; Political science; Political economy; Positive economics; Market economy; Economics; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09257304285437977,"score_gpt":0.3455588166636885,"score_spread":0.2529857738093087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389514690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1059786,0.0020565724,0.034556054,0.02622421,0.0005809305,0.0001832933,0.00016708634,0.00019433067,0.83005893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8996389,0.0011399641,0.0057996507,0.004328677,0.00022421012,0.00019967373,0.00008020331,0.000062421546,0.08852634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542266,0.0018420016,0.00018649848,0.00074595195,0.00095487764,0.0008479516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729866,0.00090426335,0.00038755557,0.0007176605,0.00043070884,0.0002611623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00313267,0.0002693284,0.0003045285,0.00069638,0.004747056,0.005010453,0.00064168975,0.0022254824,0.007951576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005231821,0.00026035195,0.0005816882,0.00069732725,0.007320872,0.0055776713,0.0065039676,0.004703028,0.0010566154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010152913,0.000019023519,0.00029395145,0.000026418189,0.0000044203193,0.00007962887,0.00087810226,0.00020578834,0.00015692084,0.992667,0.0020043962,0.003654141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045582736,0.00009865307,0.003191981,0.00041476742,0.000027649436,0.0005263731,0.0026158497,0.0034474363,0.0018355204,0.575518,0.41220897,0.00006910905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034688357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004659283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007951576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005005722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004478852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036319196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390689918","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v16i2.815","title":"Review of André et al.’s From Evolutionary Biology to Economics and Back: Parallels and Crossings between Economics and Evolution. Cham: Springer, 2022, xi + 186.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Evolutionary economics; Humanities; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Economics; Operations management","score_opus":0.04499016678296172,"score_gpt":0.2698241971974233,"score_spread":0.22483403041446157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390689918","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000087415465,0.95356613,0.000589416,0.025772797,0.017049888,0.000005358274,0.00005530882,0.00001553877,0.0028581892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016302033,0.95016277,0.0008042655,0.0190897,0.021486262,0.000018519277,0.00011948685,0.000040890387,0.006647979],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991468,0.0002617114,0.000113939095,0.00014282622,0.0002787232,0.000055945256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99512213,0.003079926,0.00026336504,0.0001285555,0.0011470765,0.0002589182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028943592,0.0011613347,0.0014319937,0.004504758,0.0006765308,0.0024054423,0.0014546736,0.0025005108,0.00967504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009607192,0.00055661815,0.00066056143,0.005278529,0.0020291072,0.0034861069,0.0012826571,0.003991319,0.0069287457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041637973,0.000021264303,0.00012289226,0.0023859756,0.000057477395,0.000080522565,0.00013954617,0.00013960808,0.000119006465,0.010677451,0.8339339,0.1522807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008469743,0.0000129678865,0.00029527472,0.001998449,0.00002529363,0.00033200975,0.000050271552,0.000030481904,0.00007324268,0.004327676,0.9928334,0.00001245265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021303752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041657635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00967504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001559792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023331493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032366157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399100676","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v17i1.849","title":"The Challenge of Choosing Well","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.20906842203831233,"score_gpt":0.4478009860038947,"score_spread":0.23873256396558235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399100676","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039647156,0.005636693,0.006507223,0.93379843,0.002766542,0.000026698306,0.00006127831,0.000033549128,0.047204975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61133057,0.011261285,0.033825275,0.2937635,0.0057533584,0.00033777542,0.00020404944,0.0005456248,0.04297858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94203585,0.03165659,0.0026560836,0.006283401,0.013320749,0.004047289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8536578,0.06638119,0.0071556014,0.007038432,0.033900876,0.031866185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059269965,0.0007988757,0.0022086587,0.0034364413,0.016313693,0.028171629,0.0038071044,0.017116511,0.0137179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11403728,0.0005806914,0.0007042449,0.002658311,0.056207404,0.03386222,0.009839547,0.02547922,0.0056675565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053057203,0.00013828391,0.0010459397,0.00018643927,0.00005887433,0.00013381237,0.0043013347,0.00029551674,0.00016326772,0.80730414,0.14126538,0.045053992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038324266,0.00002211385,0.0003914208,0.0004280452,0.000018447956,0.00008366622,0.009271979,0.00037700325,0.00013086907,0.83735055,0.15182506,0.00006249571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021889929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029360324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059269965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014883358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040866327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31345326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400595503","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v17i1.797","title":"The Hardness of the Practical Might","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hardness; Materials science; Metallurgy","score_opus":0.07007429948625031,"score_gpt":0.2851017810942362,"score_spread":0.21502748160798585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400595503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02156535,0.0020446852,0.13614494,0.044288676,0.0005669296,0.00013991828,0.00036398103,0.00027683142,0.7946088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8474868,0.0010697833,0.044512935,0.007063659,0.00056636863,0.0003991005,0.00034807943,0.0004142148,0.09813913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873167,0.005038196,0.0006174905,0.0033019155,0.0025977409,0.0011279989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98675364,0.006196761,0.0006057986,0.0044145123,0.0013509765,0.0006782442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008290524,0.0010235591,0.00095810276,0.0015328805,0.0067190644,0.0111004785,0.0024445981,0.005878992,0.037689455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024824396,0.0009780914,0.0014919754,0.0012487598,0.026502967,0.020585641,0.008900209,0.009472004,0.0046828734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010756559,0.000004515917,0.000076652905,0.00001675016,0.0000029783698,0.000020164394,0.00023487462,0.00013451028,0.000043945125,0.99509025,0.0015313529,0.0028331992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010568095,0.000014451017,0.0001904151,0.000041190167,0.000006053116,0.00007567966,0.00026219233,0.00088836515,0.00014539802,0.9565986,0.041753136,0.000013859342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003499477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029691714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037689455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005652362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028089548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12608379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400595737","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v17i1.876","title":"The Hard Things about Hard Choices? A Reply to Chang","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.08733137235003517,"score_gpt":0.2796765872030998,"score_spread":0.1923452148530646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400595737","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017712123,0.0014102138,0.00009922457,0.993547,0.004159373,0.0000012383404,0.00000802673,0.0000076195784,0.0005901618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009010706,0.0012877259,0.0001935536,0.98211575,0.0059615723,0.000013411739,0.000009276354,0.00003832516,0.0013697369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889475,0.005651657,0.00043522604,0.0014274406,0.0026921025,0.0008460726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90846485,0.07460809,0.0026264882,0.0023297905,0.0075749303,0.0043958183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019862162,0.00094618823,0.0016638491,0.0013244736,0.005957425,0.0071432455,0.0043875077,0.034115553,0.0056889704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10206869,0.001020494,0.0010916672,0.0022967434,0.020111566,0.01580976,0.0063791475,0.06294286,0.0025762073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034324938,0.000015293808,0.00020843236,0.00007565806,0.000012378833,0.00012544122,0.001915146,0.00008522754,0.00007745196,0.03971342,0.95371723,0.004019996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012320091,0.00008261644,0.0015048707,0.0011598864,0.000036543155,0.0006679483,0.0092255175,0.0005659717,0.0005043785,0.17699769,0.8088534,0.00027790054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009722184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010126458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034115553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053826915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007470363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1050424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}