{"meta":{"query_hash":"871e782eacc9","filters":{"venue":"Erkenntnis"},"cohort_total":54,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":54,"exported":54,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/871e782eacc9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Erkenntnis"},"results":[{"id":"W111828648","doi":"10.1023/a:1020932406567","title":"Kim On Reduction","year":2002,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Reduction (mathematics); CONTEST; Materialism; Ontology; Philosophy; Eliminative materialism; Cognitive science; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.044758593058668125,"score_gpt":0.2899785431315155,"score_spread":0.24521995007284736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W111828648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00667671,0.011762413,0.02539098,0.02282163,0.0045285104,0.00004101783,0.0004635629,0.00036919743,0.92794603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3075161,0.009232637,0.018868763,0.009018255,0.0040623425,0.00013390597,0.0008515007,0.00097006524,0.64934635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994349,0.00016638328,0.000029281584,0.0001348728,0.0001599952,0.00007451325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996779,0.00012611154,0.000015060653,0.000082869316,0.000074915326,0.00002320191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000551489,0.0007518553,0.000888548,0.0019598363,0.0029248581,0.0024040341,0.0007752166,0.0011962303,0.046682764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013762028,0.00047018885,0.0007874513,0.0016059055,0.003876792,0.008862886,0.002777418,0.004581917,0.008785738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013595501,0.00000807458,0.000031316908,0.00003983156,0.0000042234265,0.000020092963,0.00023811939,0.00005162463,0.00013344198,0.9671067,0.023396393,0.008956556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009927327,0.000005840172,0.000091161935,0.000029779781,0.0000070245737,0.000060380564,0.00012647895,0.00016689346,0.00023538376,0.8350315,0.16422692,0.000008700753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019985456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002182568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046682764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002224663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006862447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15616941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W119078039","doi":"10.1023/a:1016307111148","title":"Externalism, Memory, and Self-Knowledge","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Epistemology; Doctrine; Philosophy; Ontology; Subject (documents); Individuation; Inclusion (mineral); Value (mathematics); A priori and a posteriori; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Theology; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06696832159040311,"score_gpt":0.25196915492412764,"score_spread":0.18500083333372452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W119078039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26586634,0.019956129,0.10071906,0.030334355,0.0004382444,0.000047387573,0.00020537125,0.00014266695,0.58229053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902712,0.001508517,0.0026542267,0.00043070086,0.00013975464,0.000025160383,0.000059568396,0.000022738835,0.0048880894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979632,0.0009983204,0.00014527132,0.00035117508,0.00033608626,0.00020601979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929773,0.0045757783,0.00062576105,0.0011279413,0.0004528096,0.00024040855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002910156,0.0003606562,0.0005959654,0.0018049008,0.0020694751,0.009105468,0.0011826691,0.0022644491,0.0052766716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086919,0.00023026949,0.00041832245,0.0014331971,0.02628449,0.0128539605,0.0038812067,0.0026353209,0.00037386816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027318514,0.00001939694,0.00046284884,0.000068205256,0.000011135276,0.000049450977,0.004035438,0.00019697563,0.000118015254,0.9867318,0.00040450768,0.007874867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006328537,0.000005191805,0.00018514231,0.000043605396,0.0000049093796,0.00006221513,0.0014361213,0.00019112686,0.0001276927,0.9949084,0.003024232,0.000004992553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001368888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009596303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009105468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015291885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015306263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017652273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W136671433","doi":"10.1023/a:1010744722791","title":"On Michael Smith's Internalisms","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04195958711766651,"score_gpt":0.24730682966483689,"score_spread":0.20534724254717038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W136671433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008538469,0.003849619,0.02032452,0.16151795,0.002342569,0.000027822314,0.00008534528,0.00011016161,0.8032035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6769572,0.0035843418,0.0102790315,0.039595027,0.0035393797,0.00024407751,0.000076697725,0.00040742345,0.2653168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621695,0.0019481211,0.000119597324,0.0004537775,0.00083462335,0.00042690878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730825,0.001543982,0.00017833806,0.00031113805,0.00044939297,0.00020889218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037113922,0.0006563469,0.00066927745,0.0019779408,0.007672966,0.008706494,0.0014309639,0.0047847973,0.014386981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072444007,0.0004616382,0.0005323272,0.0015483533,0.035614982,0.012254947,0.0064775697,0.011230055,0.0026524074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002182166,0.0000017212972,0.00001000379,0.0000038310404,6.765362e-7,0.000007528749,0.00068770093,0.000017184506,0.000008174055,0.99371225,0.004635947,0.0009127224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041086028,0.0000019559468,0.000027416205,0.000029629933,0.0000015733092,0.000020408823,0.00061145244,0.000067007866,0.000039364328,0.94286513,0.056327518,0.000004365817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060938755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063330703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014386981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065280357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003192231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04812926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963871532","doi":"10.1007/s10670-014-9680-3","title":"Variance, Invariance and Statistical Explanation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Relation (database); Epistemology; Extant taxon; Metaphysics; Population; Philosophy of science; Variance (accounting); Function (biology); Mathematics; Econometrics; Philosophy; Computer science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.025804800020924314,"score_gpt":0.20554729652790166,"score_spread":0.17974249650697735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963871532","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08767839,0.036681395,0.73163265,0.034127116,0.0010980052,0.000046399422,0.00060782756,0.00041365373,0.107714586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95532525,0.003931793,0.032709233,0.0015319379,0.0014613323,0.00009095716,0.00022421608,0.000098216726,0.004626998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952193,0.0030912517,0.0002380259,0.0006675487,0.0005647543,0.00021918898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749228,0.020323586,0.00082954124,0.003015047,0.0007246851,0.00018434312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008338865,0.00060340937,0.0012495922,0.0021405017,0.0013490686,0.0030389142,0.0012695265,0.0017696173,0.005115685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027937418,0.0004921082,0.0012177309,0.0018029304,0.014324624,0.0056110662,0.0018742961,0.0026299537,0.0004093073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001686553,0.00000871103,0.00070532144,0.000037481776,0.00003254921,0.00002996987,0.00029872096,0.0007435955,0.00008128225,0.9912661,0.0007912608,0.0059880805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051801894,0.0000043182076,0.0005092119,0.000011256862,0.000006791,0.000029369525,0.000053243708,0.0011338381,0.00003940149,0.9968566,0.0013457638,0.00000515869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038906976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023403773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008338865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014905602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013209236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0441007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972435691","doi":"10.1007/s10670-008-9122-1","title":"Underdetermination and Meaning Indeterminacy: What is the Difference?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Underdetermination; Quine; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Philosophy; Relation (database); Ontology; Realism; Scientific theory; Philosophy of science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06531286163881571,"score_gpt":0.22231737943285618,"score_spread":0.15700451779404045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972435691","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11982917,0.067270376,0.15172982,0.36641258,0.0031817078,0.00009985928,0.00036897726,0.0002606727,0.29084682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96800363,0.00702916,0.011053023,0.0070583476,0.0020624495,0.00009705158,0.00011566738,0.00015096233,0.0044296584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860411,0.008556927,0.00068790984,0.0016720241,0.0021488604,0.0008931816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957221,0.031334214,0.001963378,0.0053135315,0.0031788922,0.0009890068],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020384701,0.00062791177,0.0022006072,0.0022813156,0.0037866966,0.014833155,0.0032917294,0.006150054,0.007844606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04804795,0.0007999052,0.0010463634,0.0027440195,0.071093984,0.040470026,0.0068479404,0.009250857,0.0010769017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038320064,0.00001266393,0.00046262867,0.00008095733,0.000013214737,0.00005200427,0.0047570495,0.00009601002,0.000070350296,0.9834049,0.0013857579,0.00962611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011017738,0.0000047154444,0.00022813537,0.000050698804,0.0000072679454,0.000049225127,0.0014591906,0.00016503574,0.00006056457,0.9920989,0.00585627,0.000008925636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030106697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022605376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030030007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041301204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10780591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981383347","doi":"10.1007/s10670-006-9023-0","title":"Kim’s Supervenience Argument and Nonreductive Physicalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Physicalism; Supervenience; Reductio ad absurdum; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Causation; Philosophy of mind; Ontology; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Philosophy of science; Eliminative materialism; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.017352599505901803,"score_gpt":0.3184983128571882,"score_spread":0.3011457133512864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981383347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08669781,0.0042185714,0.05571865,0.03637367,0.0014803833,0.000044605076,0.0002525592,0.00020633698,0.8150073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9497899,0.0010009799,0.00965334,0.002308503,0.00075694127,0.000046015197,0.00010561107,0.00007291087,0.036265764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941874,0.00016437979,0.000032866963,0.00015099047,0.00013167926,0.00010133831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989957,0.0005452851,0.00007535026,0.00021685204,0.000111021895,0.000055807643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010258709,0.00038728965,0.0005010668,0.00115624,0.0023243695,0.0020684956,0.001269214,0.0017513927,0.014814095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025501966,0.00041564828,0.00097289425,0.0007077418,0.007817509,0.009383707,0.0028516864,0.0040298207,0.00095798186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008944492,0.0000053275903,0.000034347504,0.000019342355,0.0000028919649,0.000032771553,0.00022566937,0.000035847774,0.00007312228,0.9971764,0.0012459562,0.0011393373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011333457,0.0000043967743,0.0001497856,0.00000985786,0.000004591826,0.00006459498,0.0001178985,0.00016309592,0.00012772168,0.991039,0.008303775,0.000003919754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007455233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009309563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014814095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013704456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052234053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049558103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988146727","doi":"10.1007/s10670-006-9000-7","title":"Causation and Counterfactual Dependence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Causation; Counterfactual conditional; Scrutiny; Relation (database); Epistemology; Positive economics; Ontology; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Economics; Computer science; Theology; Medicine","score_opus":0.024236784982294715,"score_gpt":0.19399583495030792,"score_spread":0.16975904996801322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988146727","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12164262,0.014264456,0.47223204,0.050849322,0.0015074243,0.00017631939,0.0007092412,0.0004276546,0.33819088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618617,0.0025326288,0.022184597,0.0019952115,0.0008915269,0.00017757162,0.00016141118,0.000099163364,0.010096179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905874,0.005192742,0.00056318747,0.001718517,0.0014512473,0.00048696328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9419329,0.048096824,0.0021277403,0.005526258,0.0018998942,0.00041632837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013140946,0.0008323229,0.0016131104,0.0037638077,0.002518344,0.005183355,0.002117605,0.0040264823,0.015004604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039875533,0.0012135718,0.0019054001,0.0022070536,0.018389788,0.015604421,0.004931827,0.005157903,0.0007528712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011369227,0.0000071005547,0.00014541442,0.00002317275,0.000015821472,0.000053858475,0.00021066748,0.0001918949,0.000030505269,0.9978009,0.00026744965,0.0012417753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066552316,0.0000022081995,0.000092137176,0.000008823882,0.000008077504,0.000040682324,0.00004287953,0.00041300303,0.000046834983,0.9980598,0.0012750983,0.000003698271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025052188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017276175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015004604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002472153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00149953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06949681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995866554","doi":"10.1007/s10670-007-9066-x","title":"Mental Causation and the Supervenience Argument","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supervenience; Causation; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Premise; Individuation; Counterfactual thinking; Ontology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Metaphysics; Psychology","score_opus":0.015817550383342708,"score_gpt":0.3003833870981925,"score_spread":0.2845658367148498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995866554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10697212,0.01678965,0.21729043,0.08196679,0.0010367238,0.00004430306,0.00023262584,0.00035929444,0.5753081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97066903,0.0022819554,0.012378596,0.0024181947,0.0007564892,0.00004890353,0.0000919343,0.000058020127,0.011296881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805933,0.0010379415,0.0000733802,0.00027338488,0.00039070207,0.00016516072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99537694,0.0035197432,0.00025545585,0.00046659514,0.00026413432,0.0001170677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028370344,0.00051012344,0.0006901655,0.0019516643,0.0022993411,0.0032015701,0.0011889718,0.0029031828,0.008194922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006510768,0.00043722082,0.00080823654,0.0008429383,0.013639793,0.0072354726,0.0025724594,0.0045728027,0.000696692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047918147,0.0000038561298,0.00004961477,0.000013662838,0.0000029986322,0.000024574636,0.00018956866,0.000058040794,0.000040982166,0.99804556,0.00044801758,0.0011183405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005350201,0.0000019387383,0.00008398641,0.0000071845575,0.000002120155,0.000035223544,0.000045589957,0.0001556338,0.00003947533,0.99777454,0.0018472343,0.0000018505287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015937999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012666127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008194922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017523242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010748499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02741474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021095616","doi":"10.1007/s10670-010-9221-7","title":"Developmental Process Reliabilism: on Justification, Defeat, and Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Epistemology; Process (computing); Ontology; Internalism and externalism; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.08143505972504642,"score_gpt":0.29671524185062126,"score_spread":0.21528018212557484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021095616","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09879137,0.026732193,0.51370376,0.14593922,0.00077378575,0.00021044802,0.00035824077,0.0003284037,0.21316265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9517614,0.002719596,0.040664826,0.0016020127,0.0003297838,0.00018936265,0.00013373305,0.00012945346,0.0024697557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9767488,0.014832624,0.001316012,0.0026249979,0.0033249317,0.00115267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8205647,0.15022084,0.0054190247,0.014896231,0.007071773,0.0018273127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04118197,0.0010094494,0.0017346274,0.0060671186,0.004023441,0.009044932,0.005220923,0.007721664,0.006111446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12732859,0.0011007154,0.0015238842,0.0029744992,0.071597725,0.027163006,0.009256754,0.010876458,0.00065019936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015355825,0.000008898838,0.00026653928,0.000046861813,0.0000073540036,0.000044939185,0.0009311394,0.00021660108,0.000025447682,0.9947507,0.0002839613,0.0034021374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008399605,0.0000038641847,0.0000981894,0.00007542672,0.000004493477,0.000037221,0.00027708235,0.00066191563,0.00010109663,0.99697256,0.0017532881,0.000006365911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029627203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021472792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04118197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006491676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006347039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21779364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025273640","doi":"10.1007/s10670-011-9321-z","title":"On Reichenbach’s Causal Betweenness","year":2011,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Betweenness centrality; Ontology; Epistemology; Verifiable secret sharing; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.099138745844167,"score_gpt":0.22972768933197033,"score_spread":0.1305889434878033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025273640","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014143864,0.0065734144,0.48499796,0.03494028,0.0023185655,0.00013609874,0.00053711893,0.0004126358,0.45594013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81029576,0.004648896,0.10423053,0.0072612828,0.0026792954,0.00051504123,0.00035095925,0.0004334097,0.06958485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958754,0.0017089931,0.0003287995,0.0010653978,0.00074345974,0.00027798314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359196,0.00391248,0.00033656336,0.001305667,0.00072079926,0.0001325453],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061729075,0.00085528474,0.0011140439,0.0039179116,0.003933236,0.003464174,0.001515805,0.0029681835,0.013555773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015039238,0.001148593,0.0017119211,0.0019594603,0.01773792,0.0145819485,0.005718715,0.006070052,0.0020652765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002586831,0.0000011342793,0.00001942482,0.000010622678,0.0000045847364,0.000013739009,0.000115367766,0.000063364125,0.000019569312,0.99791855,0.00059539604,0.0012356997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024417216,0.0000014746006,0.000026812171,0.000007819563,0.000003716278,0.000017368142,0.000019384674,0.00011336992,0.000032401604,0.9954411,0.004331202,0.0000030400645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017656517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00152882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99606675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025804525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012060996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045348525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028155864","doi":"10.1007/s10670-011-9271-5","title":"Believing For a Reason","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Ontology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.24672533188121026,"score_gpt":0.27170041660330635,"score_spread":0.024975084722096086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028155864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04433132,0.011410168,0.1984504,0.18506865,0.0027883113,0.00012530688,0.00048792877,0.0003450611,0.5569929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9126325,0.003351504,0.04121861,0.013997975,0.0013886226,0.00023220268,0.00047549664,0.00020059281,0.02650241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929287,0.0038473792,0.00029174465,0.001346271,0.0011915455,0.00039426403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99017966,0.006156804,0.00049311115,0.0018332452,0.00095831323,0.00037882253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063740625,0.00078548293,0.0009882753,0.0015348187,0.0038860545,0.0076632956,0.0017094038,0.005411161,0.010957944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02068919,0.0005017223,0.0011370026,0.0007784253,0.024993662,0.013362992,0.003790685,0.008776761,0.0018468545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136100825,0.000012570079,0.00013847614,0.00004060524,0.0000120495415,0.000036908925,0.0010516947,0.00013763183,0.00008364224,0.99336255,0.0022288724,0.0028813728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006160389,0.000003745427,0.000046811216,0.000035553083,0.0000051251463,0.000044577013,0.0002883426,0.00021032357,0.00008030699,0.9874521,0.0118221305,0.000004779614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018358179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012939582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010957944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025606102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022838253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03665799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028456077","doi":"10.1007/s10670-012-9386-3","title":"Frankfurt Cases, Alternate Possibilities, and Prior Signs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Counterfactual thinking; Epistemology; Sign (mathematics); Philosophy; Free will; Compatibilism; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); Ontology; Law; Moral responsibility; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.045484181155970325,"score_gpt":0.2679285599991405,"score_spread":0.22244437884317017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028456077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048028097,0.0031581952,0.009690259,0.01870026,0.00034002823,0.000022815802,0.000106797874,0.00003969504,0.9199138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9383489,0.0017019949,0.0039836224,0.0023137738,0.0002677449,0.00005684906,0.00011436219,0.00004515981,0.05316762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803585,0.0006320822,0.00011989238,0.00031839003,0.00040272786,0.00049097167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981207,0.0010874479,0.0001901428,0.0003721218,0.00011444785,0.00011511482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021107811,0.0004014284,0.0003335165,0.0019517546,0.004455891,0.00667394,0.0012773004,0.004948845,0.018770475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008502607,0.00037372828,0.00042630133,0.0013725157,0.020221334,0.012682808,0.0043410873,0.004425287,0.0015913934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062124814,0.0000033304589,0.00009804501,0.0000055115956,7.9900826e-7,0.00032689498,0.0009842224,0.00001878637,0.000024448571,0.9941328,0.0016694855,0.0027295363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007585851,0.000004690868,0.0003492841,0.00006544993,0.00000409477,0.0016498675,0.0017706336,0.00010125702,0.0001193542,0.95368344,0.042235162,0.000009338091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050763795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010407062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018770475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027565763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011735354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06279355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037543318","doi":"10.1007/s10670-009-9177-7","title":"The Generalization Problem and the Identity Solution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Supervenience; Identity (music); Property (philosophy); Scrutiny; Epistemology; Generalization; Face (sociological concept); Ontology; Physicalism; Premise; Mathematics; Sociology; Philosophy; Metaphysics; Political science; Law; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.013269229292995895,"score_gpt":0.2936986691426556,"score_spread":0.2804294398496597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037543318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07492039,0.0051374296,0.3995193,0.06746505,0.001518,0.00010484333,0.00033546635,0.00038465805,0.45061484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.881801,0.0023523301,0.07801929,0.003338962,0.0014648776,0.00020561264,0.00032546467,0.00015842894,0.03233404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974136,0.0011341558,0.00013645928,0.000568286,0.00048262105,0.0002648447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955622,0.0026808034,0.00021664015,0.0009149946,0.00042709435,0.00019831352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040537063,0.00059334125,0.0012122616,0.0013282582,0.0035023785,0.0028373122,0.0020769078,0.0034337707,0.016415993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013921952,0.00046731223,0.0014516313,0.0012270887,0.011673063,0.0143263275,0.005909861,0.006050885,0.0016810554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000822651,0.000005687413,0.000037806083,0.000014967384,0.0000031692555,0.00001357049,0.00010045498,0.00014882446,0.000024887577,0.9954444,0.0013009446,0.002897129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004785841,0.000001174773,0.000020685908,0.000004192661,0.0000010496838,0.000012443277,0.000030191362,0.0003705316,0.000019983725,0.99837685,0.0011563951,0.0000015545398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018765455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011887901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016415993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001916149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00202542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05491692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038345004","doi":"10.1007/s10670-013-9563-z","title":"Does the Paradox of Fiction Exist?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Irrational number; Epistemology; Existentialism; Ontology; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024275560502652435,"score_gpt":0.3045322657499924,"score_spread":0.28025670524734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038345004","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04175849,0.022494795,0.010349708,0.5312295,0.003315841,0.000015705777,0.00016925606,0.000109697176,0.39055693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91238993,0.0069369497,0.0031512138,0.050488204,0.004878997,0.00004617073,0.000114522176,0.00013286642,0.021861054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980742,0.00086836354,0.00006720783,0.00030899714,0.00044547854,0.00023580865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98712015,0.009435434,0.0008134969,0.0010732773,0.001057645,0.00050006947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045500514,0.00028709046,0.0007583343,0.0016248518,0.003186575,0.0060231593,0.0015096602,0.006238648,0.014717373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026345126,0.00019873846,0.00038175363,0.0010906444,0.026853675,0.016684845,0.003144191,0.0071505783,0.0018641611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028261536,0.00001318894,0.00027417598,0.00005368844,0.000009295291,0.00007192349,0.0022927548,0.000043778004,0.000066515306,0.9795645,0.010913572,0.006668356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017933307,0.000007533513,0.00043936333,0.00008852914,0.000006134606,0.00017404588,0.0017434009,0.00013306031,0.00007788076,0.9431432,0.05415665,0.0000122566225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016227338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012348391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014717373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014808705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001238027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04923451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055204881","doi":"10.1007/s10670-007-9085-7","title":"A Note on the Nomic Possibility of a Dynamic Shift","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Relativity and Gravitational Theory","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft","keywords":"Object (grammar); Ontology; Acceleration; Constant (computer programming); Absolute (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Physics; Computer science; Classical mechanics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.008201434172468275,"score_gpt":0.27605543495490825,"score_spread":0.26785400078244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055204881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0185441,0.004876687,0.07426696,0.058783334,0.0067213173,0.00003467926,0.00036606682,0.00025189845,0.83615494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.835414,0.00427872,0.044806093,0.018128237,0.011605001,0.0002465731,0.00033359427,0.00029444168,0.084893376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980762,0.0006011413,0.00012757978,0.000492873,0.0004928018,0.00020937745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968798,0.001968801,0.00013883981,0.00051294884,0.00034967897,0.00014987074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030606976,0.00048331273,0.00090122817,0.0014157945,0.006346549,0.0040586283,0.0019650466,0.0039615515,0.014124321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006005417,0.0004269402,0.0009552463,0.0010385766,0.016061768,0.012156751,0.0044638496,0.009066006,0.0018975855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000699205,0.0000017726315,0.000030327337,0.0000106507905,0.0000015359805,0.000057255827,0.00013291296,0.000034255434,0.00008551889,0.9964173,0.0021046519,0.0011168098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005673123,0.0000050284716,0.00008427184,0.000013417074,0.000003622895,0.00011876179,0.000076420016,0.0001256792,0.00009220933,0.973752,0.025712652,0.000010246018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015294425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00208388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014124321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013843733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009743817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04725063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056414158","doi":"10.1007/s10670-007-9055-0","title":"The Two Faces of Evidentialism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Ontology; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.061620227689477364,"score_gpt":0.31269785326664845,"score_spread":0.25107762557717106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056414158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027756205,0.023527753,0.20710683,0.3884515,0.0024817516,0.000057365665,0.00029755736,0.00023026126,0.35009083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91511977,0.005843579,0.04284468,0.013528145,0.0046116235,0.0002694911,0.00013587395,0.00024720203,0.0173996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815523,0.011353848,0.0006710183,0.001674346,0.003911439,0.0008370194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95734805,0.032176875,0.0013105082,0.0052484856,0.0027331044,0.0011830854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023931786,0.0006064374,0.0020051864,0.0026363577,0.0055725006,0.012615186,0.0028806373,0.007157924,0.010568524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042128958,0.00081198505,0.0009826715,0.0015598201,0.055912543,0.031639595,0.008135137,0.013421927,0.0014336858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053084655,0.0000034468342,0.000021755015,0.000012779604,0.000001593866,0.0000064489864,0.00044749878,0.000030304456,0.0000132664,0.9973239,0.0008106731,0.0013230284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048788165,0.0000015391928,0.000029221412,0.000021944741,0.0000010544743,0.0000140620705,0.00024443862,0.00012398622,0.000019711404,0.99483514,0.0046999916,0.0000039709084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012885162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001237585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023931786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033882791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003073806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12656492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080346044","doi":"10.1007/s10670-013-9541-5","title":"The Best Humean System for Statistical Mechanics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Determinism; Statistical mechanics; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Ontology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Statistical physics; Physics","score_opus":0.044701341106181756,"score_gpt":0.22214754016961483,"score_spread":0.17744619906343306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080346044","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067852205,0.0012949696,0.89407855,0.0039150533,0.001530942,0.000089398534,0.0006589802,0.0018884819,0.08975834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36386782,0.0013451069,0.5607842,0.0024804608,0.003221495,0.0005707054,0.001063394,0.0020769623,0.06458991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997233,0.0013394238,0.0001576757,0.00043159182,0.0006297844,0.00020855197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972351,0.00080359465,0.000084811334,0.0011546431,0.00056173396,0.00016024464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002943396,0.00078535866,0.0013721053,0.0027030136,0.0041410923,0.0046081655,0.001858479,0.0022290589,0.025282312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012856416,0.0006414873,0.0012178805,0.0016933447,0.005093918,0.0073441607,0.005611276,0.003682562,0.0105524855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024844003,0.000008061746,0.00006901435,0.000032036274,0.000006860379,0.00001164586,0.00007504107,0.000750972,0.00019826446,0.97562635,0.0060568424,0.017140066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000080740265,0.0000094384295,0.000036671077,0.000022088077,0.0000065386134,0.000021278394,0.000022036866,0.0085349055,0.0003363544,0.97217697,0.018814918,0.000010706307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008710872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009791277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012635425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016995935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0845778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093584168","doi":"10.1007/s10670-011-9354-3","title":"The Necessity of Origin: A Long and Winding Route","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Mathematical proof; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Locality; Ontology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Theoretical physics; Physics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06199585328019318,"score_gpt":0.30735168896398124,"score_spread":0.24535583568378805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093584168","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0208905,0.1283941,0.10038692,0.526957,0.008476098,0.0000520909,0.00047960182,0.00029826636,0.21406543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7448996,0.056398127,0.04930933,0.053802878,0.026628254,0.00025386852,0.00044465618,0.0010342905,0.067229114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975389,0.0012237467,0.00012767868,0.00049979426,0.00047841918,0.00013146042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816458,0.013570547,0.0005765739,0.001781647,0.001763411,0.0006620408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00558962,0.0008122617,0.0019907665,0.0023896804,0.004633754,0.010108711,0.0021827768,0.007909765,0.019882655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0174421,0.0006766759,0.00066199264,0.0016230064,0.0295381,0.056906518,0.0053718956,0.011177588,0.0039590006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042169504,0.000010997257,0.00008394833,0.00007584404,0.000007880363,0.0000410218,0.0005659133,0.00006505772,0.00009137149,0.9831822,0.007860431,0.007973137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012691974,0.000005815399,0.00006172601,0.00008813489,0.0000036479125,0.00005077966,0.00036159158,0.00014314684,0.00004690644,0.9753338,0.023879861,0.000011806744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012828532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012251531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019882655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025798462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018216713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066514075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100144864","doi":"10.1007/s10670-010-9233-3","title":"Beyond Reduction and Pluralism: Toward an Epistemology of Explanatory Integration in Biology","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Unification; Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039353596899372685,"score_gpt":0.2630729464997278,"score_spread":0.2237193496003551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100144864","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04119967,0.004248665,0.727033,0.05501599,0.0005295866,0.0001261693,0.00016020423,0.00032557323,0.17136116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89132226,0.000923085,0.098920286,0.0018847751,0.0005780319,0.00026991707,0.00016988849,0.00022766438,0.005704151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924561,0.0049993778,0.0003381079,0.00095360074,0.0008528365,0.00040006769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849417,0.009928938,0.0009294031,0.0023104402,0.0012196873,0.0006697736],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012590022,0.0008415964,0.0016038701,0.004213595,0.0056358124,0.009075654,0.003823281,0.0034946233,0.0055849496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018410595,0.00091196183,0.001893434,0.0026926321,0.06425942,0.026601268,0.010575067,0.009450979,0.0006865528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005638556,0.000005995598,0.00010207843,0.00001866337,0.00000480269,0.00001320146,0.0018395069,0.00013454385,0.00003069218,0.9960479,0.000256869,0.001540093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003862052,0.0000017257183,0.00003197081,0.000011832945,0.000002776733,0.000012129404,0.00029915123,0.00043088087,0.000035011246,0.9973673,0.0018006011,0.0000026643622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039276243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030628648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037046878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042900755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066583216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117905967","doi":"10.1007/s10670-005-4411-4","title":"Causal Realism: Events and Processes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Comic Relief","keywords":"Causation; Epistemology; Realism; Causal theory of reference; Metaphysics; Causal model; Philosophy; Causal structure; Causality (physics); Ontology; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.03840990935980051,"score_gpt":0.22491876772981745,"score_spread":0.18650885837001693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117905967","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026213676,0.03123095,0.43982247,0.071180865,0.0018524341,0.00011064401,0.0005469386,0.00028127446,0.4287608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92128223,0.009362026,0.035562143,0.003149775,0.002414001,0.0002602567,0.00026057984,0.000115142146,0.027593823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971173,0.001850694,0.00012464712,0.0003607708,0.00037038597,0.00017621618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925054,0.0058737798,0.00037698005,0.0007029232,0.00035427848,0.0001867559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004434163,0.00083990715,0.0008872083,0.0025656302,0.003099299,0.0077158934,0.001649271,0.005107549,0.01138163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009896868,0.00078005146,0.0008885518,0.002517053,0.027684523,0.015857039,0.0029920693,0.0054682037,0.00079180987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011463601,0.0000010671401,0.000007943812,0.0000065093545,8.231181e-7,0.000004717239,0.00016753875,0.00005449109,0.0000069920548,0.9993061,0.0001896051,0.00025301045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033585645,9.3654006e-7,0.000012811567,0.0000072522657,0.0000014866392,0.000009583531,0.000092951865,0.00015119712,0.000013235734,0.9956203,0.0040852334,0.0000015018453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044333567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002530967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01138163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042582126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023022834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038075328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139989865","doi":"10.1007/s10670-012-9422-3","title":"Indexical Reliabilism and the New Evil Demon","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indexicality; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Ontology; Demon; Philosophy of language; Counterfactual conditional; Appeal; Counterfactual thinking; Metaphysics; Law","score_opus":0.04357527472585419,"score_gpt":0.2513776039974619,"score_spread":0.2078023292716077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139989865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03684161,0.008159393,0.07309758,0.039728064,0.00095691456,0.000040701554,0.00013044561,0.00018781389,0.84085757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713442,0.0009858828,0.0069301846,0.0016297915,0.00064951804,0.000075568016,0.00004419136,0.00011031465,0.018230531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545753,0.0023900867,0.0001980164,0.000600723,0.0009317713,0.0004218347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934521,0.003887163,0.00035407674,0.0013986295,0.00061907514,0.00028904525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006459761,0.00064756244,0.0009594812,0.002756466,0.0046475073,0.009606816,0.0017903671,0.0035152647,0.008622927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010896636,0.00048067485,0.00067747437,0.0010177667,0.057974394,0.013197324,0.006815893,0.00771289,0.0008775904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003948424,0.0000019951217,0.0000136250965,0.0000072577836,0.000001118912,0.00000559095,0.00035596514,0.000046904865,0.00001550539,0.99870574,0.00028440735,0.0005578626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036522176,0.0000020478135,0.0000209371,0.0000133720805,0.0000012774198,0.000013053499,0.00014686951,0.00014791476,0.00003940917,0.99489564,0.0047127577,0.0000031388506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001208864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014267871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009606816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004572575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019031534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03416288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527428517","doi":"10.1007/s10670-016-9844-4","title":"Time Scales and Levels of Organization","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; McGill University","keywords":"Ontology; Currency; Epistemology; Sociology; Spatial organization; Work (physics); Positive economics; Ecology; Management science; Social science; Economics; Philosophy; Biology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.028838731806843022,"score_gpt":0.1904773688916658,"score_spread":0.1616386370848228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527428517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5091978,0.005834109,0.10140862,0.004790185,0.00015943787,0.000064430336,0.0005481313,0.0003081886,0.37768903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990577,0.00037462384,0.0048498637,0.000049845683,0.000049067326,0.000026851672,0.000064380896,0.000031697353,0.003976675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890184,0.00041319858,0.000060573042,0.00019879063,0.00023702462,0.00018859623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99178106,0.004698201,0.0011720473,0.0009453667,0.00069367106,0.00070975674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019192583,0.00023987523,0.0002441639,0.002251408,0.0014033808,0.005499418,0.000595457,0.00061397575,0.008488783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009281999,0.00023519817,0.00029528688,0.0024187083,0.00571759,0.0069263214,0.0014337916,0.0010032505,0.0007120099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064792825,0.000014216137,0.0036856595,0.000034503057,0.000021266367,0.000029978002,0.0046506715,0.00060261774,0.00089727424,0.9771892,0.0006179191,0.012192041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020308169,0.000046027744,0.029357104,0.00003938396,0.000027612366,0.00007552823,0.008128902,0.0018716311,0.00054018194,0.94505525,0.01481176,0.000026249738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019382262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016121469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008488783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013427814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064883806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028397799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563787834","doi":"10.1007/s10670-016-9860-4","title":"Do Compatibilists Need Alternative Possibilities?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Determinism; Epistemology; Dismissal; Normative; Philosophy; Reading (process); Ontology; Principle of sufficient reason; Free will; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04542706644419425,"score_gpt":0.27665502932994723,"score_spread":0.23122796288575298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563787834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05924679,0.005615302,0.14154476,0.16592029,0.0019398442,0.000064275555,0.0003699935,0.00042817873,0.62487054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95293677,0.0016825978,0.019831931,0.006210381,0.0016346821,0.00015056875,0.0001849789,0.00020715845,0.017160974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601007,0.0015478545,0.00021099047,0.0008400793,0.00090010534,0.0004908609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99132735,0.005039976,0.0006821734,0.0016691476,0.0007132051,0.00056816725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00664918,0.00084414874,0.0013772957,0.0020311177,0.0041086297,0.008777014,0.0022830965,0.008752616,0.039035395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022230128,0.0009640428,0.0011635404,0.0013799039,0.022098301,0.051318504,0.0058160126,0.007048581,0.004013058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014474126,0.0000057241173,0.0000418903,0.000015937689,0.0000045781585,0.00002507807,0.00024122809,0.000045904326,0.000043526466,0.9966227,0.0009960453,0.0019429944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004898891,0.0000015144899,0.000017812145,0.000005423442,0.0000017748395,0.000026185826,0.0001078446,0.00007999737,0.000022339857,0.99762326,0.0021054295,0.0000034807813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000595156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009775269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039035395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017713526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011671203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13058645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622137298","doi":"10.1007/s10670-017-9914-2","title":"Nominalism and Comparative Similarity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nominalism; Similarity (geometry); Ontology; Noun; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Metric (unit); Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.1583305433868404,"score_gpt":0.40510191620583724,"score_spread":0.24677137281899683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622137298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26452598,0.005360063,0.0832629,0.010585667,0.00055744336,0.000057030884,0.0003214938,0.00015813309,0.63517135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884621,0.00040486446,0.004889223,0.00025827225,0.00017404504,0.00002876097,0.00015519101,0.000027465301,0.005600055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688715,0.0014146484,0.00022226539,0.0006810141,0.00064035604,0.00015464844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664587,0.0017058754,0.00030293895,0.0006894907,0.00046348793,0.00019232699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022297462,0.00024064725,0.0005756346,0.0020510168,0.0022022233,0.0032010772,0.0011760364,0.0014518132,0.015263851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0097244885,0.0002598218,0.0005044631,0.0019096615,0.009984253,0.011546508,0.0040695174,0.0017962569,0.00092548446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002411169,0.000008607034,0.0002621695,0.000032087642,0.000008156711,0.00003332821,0.00096514577,0.00006682616,0.0001892692,0.99167377,0.0003941063,0.0063423784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000771627,0.0000075189355,0.00051026954,0.000011207797,0.0000038720223,0.00010843526,0.00047393705,0.00014452927,0.00009379485,0.9946682,0.0039665373,0.0000041494764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064161356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059015636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015263851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014864058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005337119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051062703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786637400","doi":"10.1007/s10670-018-9983-x","title":"Generic Generalizations in Science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Ceteris paribus; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Extension (predicate logic); Philosophy of science; Semantics (computer science); Scientific theory; Class (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06955991261327533,"score_gpt":0.24767337813969825,"score_spread":0.17811346552642293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786637400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07015188,0.0102880495,0.0875359,0.018192004,0.0008848129,0.00006051705,0.0007911453,0.00042843597,0.8116672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93186885,0.0035681133,0.0128377685,0.0019277296,0.0013884465,0.00011369152,0.0006554993,0.00018003244,0.04745989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983631,0.00056491944,0.00013063083,0.00041806194,0.00035723456,0.00016600636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983908,0.0007498445,0.0001504292,0.0003695143,0.00022361492,0.00011578507],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002106926,0.00062492484,0.0012258495,0.0031715413,0.0050419113,0.0051101083,0.0010112985,0.0019553795,0.011294642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004006975,0.00052652624,0.0012843681,0.0033495766,0.015737953,0.012326582,0.004487658,0.004620937,0.0011030129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020280688,0.000001311299,0.000025878498,0.000009147688,0.000002111242,0.00000663949,0.00018752278,0.000046809302,0.000014044558,0.9986015,0.0004552712,0.0006477429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002088137,9.81352e-7,0.000038317325,0.0000043216437,0.0000022387874,0.000011588239,0.00005440233,0.00007820044,0.000010484929,0.9961933,0.003602767,0.0000013428721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027487893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002192297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003658979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010798553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037784338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807139533","doi":"10.1007/s10670-018-0006-8","title":"On the Ramsey Test Analysis of ‘Because’","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual conditional; Epistemology; Philosophy; Ontology; Test (biology); Semantics (computer science); Mathematical economics; Counterfactual thinking; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01779501630102527,"score_gpt":0.24659712468608244,"score_spread":0.22880210838505716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807139533","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16701181,0.0018725694,0.65750784,0.01970851,0.00062319916,0.0001674441,0.0008052415,0.0013402321,0.15096314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92734665,0.0004766267,0.053723946,0.0019330318,0.00040652778,0.00011613397,0.00074637384,0.00039340594,0.014857254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939757,0.0026824404,0.00025137592,0.001008928,0.0012198458,0.00086172036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96682703,0.025058592,0.00096077746,0.003161051,0.0030070907,0.0009854301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006984756,0.0010122451,0.0020360171,0.004780832,0.0027459643,0.0041088327,0.0037937528,0.0023189038,0.019359266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0493964,0.000745539,0.0033365628,0.0032623003,0.012229616,0.022049742,0.007131169,0.00684345,0.0012733527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007499551,0.00003006449,0.0006779039,0.00004925474,0.000026315935,0.00006475297,0.0002339723,0.0015763826,0.00018109054,0.9861963,0.002684453,0.008204425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009580273,0.000010869899,0.00026747293,0.000017080818,0.000016070215,0.000037946153,0.00010205245,0.009898,0.00028143477,0.9880084,0.0013385674,0.000012553641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064145983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053142845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019359266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025862309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022690876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06476319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884006176","doi":"10.1007/s10670-018-0038-0","title":"Mind-Brain Dichotomy, Mental Disorder, and Theory of Mind","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Theory of mind; Psychology; Mental health; Mental illness; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy of science; Mental representation; Cognition; Social cognition; Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Philosophy; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.022869508383483998,"score_gpt":0.26633445474932793,"score_spread":0.24346494636584393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884006176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5915989,0.02346972,0.011705109,0.05495094,0.0004943552,0.00003396401,0.00018476244,0.00007065084,0.3174915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974208,0.0008217992,0.0005524689,0.00045506953,0.00004344089,0.000012468834,0.000021521848,0.000003285327,0.0006693294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924743,0.00039764695,0.000029534369,0.000077200086,0.0001250246,0.0001231019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870026,0.0007364939,0.00021517822,0.00008985922,0.00006813297,0.0001901665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011750489,0.00025318438,0.00031047018,0.0020993443,0.0012814318,0.0029828926,0.0005819239,0.001071571,0.0030513941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025563878,0.000085418884,0.00029154483,0.0009409774,0.014221738,0.0027173958,0.0025269624,0.0016069616,0.00014481832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075050964,0.000059440103,0.0090305405,0.000062699044,0.000021242526,0.0003966829,0.0072140433,0.0003004596,0.00031590462,0.96745545,0.0011853216,0.013883225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024918478,0.000029354258,0.011547865,0.000068191104,0.000014591068,0.0008874415,0.008527925,0.0006493515,0.00008414071,0.97281927,0.0053331135,0.000013881329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002615252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002236696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030513941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016414704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012112366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011909723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901708547","doi":"10.1007/s10670-018-0091-8","title":"Analytic Metaphysics Versus Naturalized Metaphysics: The Relevance of Applied Ontology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Ontology; Relevance (law); Field (mathematics); Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Criticism; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.05269052678647522,"score_gpt":0.25412025897687796,"score_spread":0.20142973219040272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901708547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06414523,0.034192063,0.2789439,0.1851227,0.0021679972,0.00009478566,0.00029486956,0.0002594472,0.43477902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572482,0.006521835,0.024728406,0.0043067536,0.0017992326,0.00015255608,0.000084886444,0.00016070073,0.0049974606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99134433,0.006422553,0.00029487826,0.00053856085,0.0010583688,0.0003412707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709047,0.024008477,0.0009854273,0.0021841645,0.0014263623,0.0004908221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011780651,0.0005462364,0.0014119409,0.0041261096,0.0031711208,0.010673084,0.0023599425,0.0038581463,0.0063494304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02583486,0.0005032768,0.0008892133,0.0032064603,0.056608457,0.025071692,0.0049297307,0.008128629,0.00058243715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003770694,0.000003081113,0.000028998738,0.000019188412,0.0000023127495,0.0000066520056,0.0003296372,0.00006547893,0.0000135856935,0.99836034,0.00021731555,0.00094960554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032775135,0.0000013691863,0.00003129889,0.000020071577,0.0000016241868,0.000008308215,0.00024143537,0.00032399848,0.000019292378,0.99770266,0.0016446941,0.0000018940433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036180187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021793698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011780651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004834523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00527759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06230277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918324070","doi":"10.1007/s10670-020-00291-8","title":"Finding True Clusters: On the Importance of Simplicity in Science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Simplicity; Ontology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03499872889343677,"score_gpt":0.30449325024041884,"score_spread":0.2694945213469821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918324070","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059168097,0.008201864,0.8951163,0.021746019,0.0005550188,0.00016068373,0.00061576784,0.00073644466,0.013699673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6043701,0.004214566,0.38142598,0.002881158,0.0014585117,0.00026679967,0.00091875094,0.0005553995,0.0039086947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98158294,0.008436909,0.0011755035,0.003914022,0.0042452486,0.0006453629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7828837,0.18141258,0.0052040373,0.020622479,0.006855756,0.0030214502],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02472555,0.0016910762,0.0037599998,0.006996414,0.0058128126,0.008715561,0.0057166195,0.004258981,0.0052123563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15547003,0.0017523351,0.003143102,0.005127649,0.023095744,0.030468285,0.013064021,0.007478935,0.001109131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000459313,0.00008684207,0.012231895,0.0010896847,0.00039315014,0.00048112604,0.0033344317,0.016870221,0.0012328236,0.855498,0.010941655,0.09738075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030482814,0.000023032577,0.0007304791,0.000055611967,0.000031395095,0.000182035,0.00023388652,0.012277741,0.0002982211,0.98374695,0.0023601593,0.000030041005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004498822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038193385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023095203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024208792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13076282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005022744","doi":"10.1007/s10670-020-00225-4","title":"Epistemology and the Structure of Language","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Language and cultural evolution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Natural language; Epistemology; Ontology; Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Probabilistic logic; Simple (philosophy); Term (time); Object language; Point (geometry); Language structure; Philosophy of language; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Philosophy; Psychology; Mathematics; Metaphysics; History","score_opus":0.008643180102184247,"score_gpt":0.2598615128196824,"score_spread":0.25121833271749816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005022744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3978976,0.008372834,0.19069208,0.0321827,0.00031266946,0.00011899412,0.00025273365,0.00018861021,0.36998177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872004,0.00049373944,0.01042548,0.00020737082,0.000057577825,0.000045009434,0.00006029192,0.000051521005,0.0014587356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883753,0.0085444115,0.00044927554,0.0009810816,0.0011633676,0.00048652006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626292,0.029321661,0.0021695932,0.002934572,0.0021412186,0.0008037802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010547464,0.00035575352,0.00073064055,0.005843558,0.003537942,0.009683468,0.0015707577,0.00226724,0.0054934956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039230667,0.0006047768,0.0005627925,0.0026129584,0.05413514,0.01931,0.0045025973,0.0030640925,0.0004507384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019946936,0.0000126076875,0.00078008743,0.000035105822,0.0000123024365,0.00004297049,0.006638199,0.00035169377,0.00024021154,0.9871482,0.0001627976,0.0045558913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001184866,0.000006420421,0.0005632723,0.0000377546,0.000004384941,0.000043293956,0.0017828238,0.0005114746,0.0001587984,0.99438465,0.002488003,0.000007344206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029857785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001993755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010547464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047826883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038572466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055780947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010230490","doi":"10.1007/s10670-020-00237-0","title":"Two Problems for the Constitution View of Omissions: A Reply to Palmer","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Constitution; Epistemology; Event (particle physics); Reflexive pronoun; Ontology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.09518031327257775,"score_gpt":0.3034427239640156,"score_spread":0.20826241069143786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010230490","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032934776,0.002251045,0.00079940504,0.9888843,0.0022533068,0.000003308481,0.000020535394,0.00001389901,0.0054448834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0742719,0.0054499684,0.0025203822,0.87063515,0.034822896,0.00013005397,0.000041894327,0.00018483198,0.011942827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99312407,0.0030322124,0.00039885435,0.0015796666,0.0012851494,0.0005801396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9401046,0.05034484,0.0012834554,0.0022203228,0.004542143,0.0015046821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016046792,0.0007918544,0.0021191742,0.002041513,0.007078711,0.007487644,0.0047223745,0.036243584,0.012115232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05762533,0.0009751056,0.0011005963,0.0017305855,0.049188893,0.035312224,0.0075593153,0.060092658,0.003286013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062482926,0.000017525232,0.00013073765,0.00010892468,0.000019467381,0.00022292217,0.0039190976,0.00008441452,0.00006101922,0.548721,0.43975803,0.0068943105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009762312,0.000007969601,0.0002009211,0.0003524083,0.000017124168,0.0002564617,0.0025793023,0.0002044155,0.0001539292,0.7853761,0.21068083,0.000072941104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009468618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008580742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036243584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005292754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055714967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08486456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160687356","doi":"10.1007/s10670-021-00378-w","title":"Modal Structuralism with Theoretical Terms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"European Research Council; Universität Wien; European Commission","keywords":"Peano axioms; Structuralism (philosophy of science); Axiom; Modal; Semantics (computer science); Modal logic; Mathematics; Accessibility relation; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy of mathematics; Linguistics; Algebra over a field; Philosophy; Computer science; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.008714607388055092,"score_gpt":0.27198357776715604,"score_spread":0.26326897037910096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160687356","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04085301,0.0035877146,0.71435857,0.013738427,0.00054116535,0.000081545346,0.00022384748,0.00038041512,0.22623521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.879401,0.0013333013,0.10557817,0.0013104666,0.00056181505,0.00024218131,0.00016244157,0.00018998882,0.011220619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996953,0.0014507093,0.00013495976,0.0003959794,0.0008545711,0.00021060693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976814,0.0012290844,0.0001989953,0.00041896806,0.00032888472,0.00014273988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004052977,0.0007201408,0.00058063905,0.0024835381,0.002365363,0.0038231977,0.0014046503,0.0017789232,0.0074733053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045512915,0.000445905,0.0011950709,0.0013354962,0.017917814,0.010091154,0.006205819,0.0041091936,0.0009254131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016432281,0.0000011886291,0.000010021204,0.000008375194,0.0000010143485,0.0000045094944,0.00018977401,0.00006844346,0.000059678834,0.9992086,0.00005990407,0.0003868009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004477215,0.0000043981863,0.000022552444,0.00001067343,0.0000023809303,0.000019092064,0.00010140642,0.00056662434,0.00010818279,0.99468493,0.0044726375,0.0000026824669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001450097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012035633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074733053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035681163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015756178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025888562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184632677","doi":"10.1007/s10670-021-00423-8","title":"Mereological Destruction and Relativized Parthood: A Reply to Costa and Calosi","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mereology; Ontology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027081111335005282,"score_gpt":0.3050809335784348,"score_spread":0.2779998222434295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184632677","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021662961,0.007861189,0.0019691386,0.97147703,0.002724335,0.0000070207298,0.000039745566,0.000033296445,0.013721916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24298088,0.010169037,0.00406971,0.6958667,0.031876355,0.00012875117,0.00008997593,0.0002644792,0.014554065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955249,0.0018818328,0.00026459314,0.000986056,0.0009865419,0.00035602436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683745,0.025396995,0.0010591133,0.002245285,0.0022708802,0.00065313024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009583076,0.0007939992,0.0021542145,0.001880968,0.006396271,0.0070340782,0.0054636025,0.028881963,0.007915402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031018132,0.000845102,0.0011283498,0.0025720042,0.03762464,0.025178937,0.0081843985,0.038051523,0.0026712155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007039245,0.000024584368,0.00015837926,0.00011083787,0.000027435317,0.00014941246,0.004080053,0.00012091461,0.000103098755,0.8184474,0.1716197,0.0050877803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055866374,0.0000071078975,0.00035193193,0.00022039893,0.000020544701,0.00017395263,0.0016271794,0.00036827795,0.00019394608,0.8966724,0.10025627,0.00005225915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046291514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051695085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028881963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004700567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031160095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050680757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197099054","doi":"10.1007/s10670-021-00466-x","title":"Counter Countermathematical Explanations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Impossibility; Counterfactual conditional; Ontology; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05014143426966849,"score_gpt":0.21934096751598636,"score_spread":0.16919953324631787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197099054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019949034,0.0015786663,0.030245084,0.11157364,0.0034043924,0.00010683512,0.00070388435,0.00029520664,0.83214325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8260386,0.0019224614,0.012986321,0.028220616,0.0046228752,0.00027961313,0.00055776397,0.0002556044,0.12511621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972851,0.0006579008,0.00012923415,0.0006315532,0.00089561037,0.0004005912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354833,0.0031715243,0.00059563445,0.0011656525,0.0012739459,0.0002448875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028193493,0.0008669548,0.0007333062,0.003741832,0.0031171634,0.0046882015,0.0028388617,0.0064653945,0.071054235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013458092,0.00046508005,0.00084350066,0.0020274932,0.013309628,0.011985794,0.0051762126,0.0064154062,0.0070851245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001913835,0.000012649738,0.00008738547,0.000025017238,0.0000053419367,0.00006394697,0.00052876706,0.000051506908,0.000047911883,0.9924574,0.005333597,0.001367328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044428907,0.000006193255,0.00022198442,0.000035200632,0.000009479156,0.00014742867,0.0008420739,0.0004965664,0.00020661311,0.9546386,0.04334282,0.000008725131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022839264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025399209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071054235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022794823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014222263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2377001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202424974","doi":"10.1007/s10670-021-00464-z","title":"Explicating Exact versus Conceptual Replication","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Explication; Epistemology; Computer science; Biology; Philosophy; Virology","score_opus":0.1407317113050517,"score_gpt":0.2740622726820056,"score_spread":0.13333056137695393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202424974","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027867844,0.014493451,0.6524823,0.18497527,0.004457514,0.00096387445,0.00037783914,0.0005025475,0.113879405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7814104,0.0030412045,0.18121137,0.023096154,0.0032011871,0.0031074467,0.00016537313,0.00019331164,0.004573616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7782328,0.1593892,0.011412028,0.022577211,0.02555756,0.002831184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57888216,0.29730842,0.02030385,0.08436806,0.017748887,0.0013885838],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22316605,0.0012374813,0.0025086685,0.0033289967,0.0044299318,0.009616656,0.00756294,0.012717289,0.0043438994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3382666,0.001079211,0.002179965,0.0032939592,0.09862316,0.026030198,0.012721743,0.010241331,0.0008042043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016782345,0.000010302669,0.0003963509,0.00015550981,0.000030167485,0.000047732872,0.002929535,0.000340068,0.000066186905,0.9921536,0.00072888273,0.0031249383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049113474,0.000028485892,0.00028886797,0.00018008516,0.000023834222,0.000087715875,0.0006530185,0.0011050085,0.00023545888,0.9877166,0.009607987,0.000023731656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023346217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016509072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77683395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006709508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006848288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95797455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212872363","doi":"10.1007/s10670-021-00485-8","title":"It Takes a Village to Trust Science: Towards a (Thoroughly) Social Approach to Public Trust in Science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Distrust; Public trust; Sociology; Ontology; Face (sociological concept); Trustworthiness; Public relations; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.3782005228895008,"score_gpt":0.445356912071741,"score_spread":0.0671563891822402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212872363","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11805321,0.0034394823,0.13541815,0.5555829,0.0016849759,0.00009819369,0.000057259822,0.00021965355,0.1854463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874587,0.00035017458,0.0043543414,0.005227782,0.00019266942,0.000036155,0.0000096031,0.000053280262,0.0023173532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9748794,0.018084448,0.0006895786,0.0014050428,0.0033448064,0.0015967522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95742613,0.025114566,0.0042786608,0.0046584024,0.0046142014,0.0039079487],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023420025,0.0004605427,0.0007786156,0.002325478,0.012446483,0.017788945,0.002479217,0.010746578,0.0049297656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041550085,0.00058741,0.00059562246,0.0013691338,0.07257019,0.023484575,0.013811514,0.014490568,0.0007107801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031122683,0.000045222732,0.001773642,0.00009371709,0.000042656913,0.00028963108,0.09156295,0.00044049308,0.0005149684,0.8907609,0.003864636,0.010579977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012515148,0.000029512888,0.00090254063,0.00015303794,0.000018907711,0.00016341513,0.032540742,0.001092517,0.00026312176,0.9350688,0.029710136,0.00004470577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009370115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008282346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98755354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007658769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010532684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12385839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229024353","doi":"10.1007/s10670-022-00552-8","title":"Intelligent Behaviour","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation Cluster (Canada)","funders":"Umeå Universitet; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Rationality; Ontology; Cognitive science; Cognition; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04509705116276153,"score_gpt":0.27484244571573596,"score_spread":0.22974539455297444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229024353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08148583,0.0019035472,0.19735311,0.014044202,0.00030687125,0.00023886716,0.00040749303,0.0006862308,0.7035738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8755225,0.0011968929,0.05943888,0.0019731433,0.000098290904,0.0001956475,0.00046757064,0.00013492026,0.060972165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987962,0.0005445194,0.0000686818,0.00025482828,0.00024994145,0.0000857521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998467,0.0004927452,0.00021711795,0.00039947242,0.0002743741,0.00014930668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013025153,0.00036130456,0.0002605188,0.00068674644,0.0005674755,0.0024237945,0.0006779462,0.0012541721,0.01106031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038776817,0.00015875394,0.00043750246,0.00038988327,0.0042118006,0.0018212681,0.0015241746,0.00092013605,0.0027025638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002529173,0.000044227334,0.0045029595,0.00017264717,0.00005864705,0.00018731454,0.0026235736,0.003819123,0.0033058836,0.94820184,0.006730971,0.030327579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026202864,0.00008341179,0.005554733,0.00016650227,0.00003829336,0.0006695403,0.001083269,0.012457791,0.0015427724,0.84274876,0.13558482,0.000043977816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010701647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008241122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01106031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008435083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071497454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037000358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281721018","doi":"10.1007/s10670-022-00571-5","title":"Imperfection, Accuracy, and Structural Rationality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Rationality; Irrational number; Deliberation; Imperfect; Obligation; Worry; Irrationality; Epistemology; Ecological rationality; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0437841269974259,"score_gpt":0.2709830557930916,"score_spread":0.22719892879566572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281721018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2038854,0.01337755,0.29251444,0.08114845,0.0006271404,0.00010126245,0.00041186533,0.00027893434,0.407655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98221064,0.001012669,0.012683431,0.00079729146,0.00023490564,0.00006567864,0.000069638394,0.000052034226,0.0028738072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754122,0.013620999,0.0016342205,0.0028013184,0.005094217,0.0014370572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92597485,0.05394378,0.0042472477,0.011629459,0.0035178864,0.0006868104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022853991,0.00076477544,0.001979067,0.003871667,0.0034735266,0.009888419,0.00278503,0.0046562767,0.0050572837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060508683,0.00086861436,0.0012027307,0.0023726455,0.060194988,0.02183152,0.0063828025,0.0059896596,0.0005535906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010530041,0.0000046591726,0.00014548951,0.000021135967,0.000007147544,0.000008963165,0.00038438308,0.000434438,0.000022418031,0.9975823,0.00017988856,0.001198782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046811792,0.0000015720968,0.000051552208,0.000012628907,0.0000026397358,0.0000067682295,0.00010098304,0.000335676,0.000034507422,0.9989304,0.00051568705,0.000002882036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004916455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032305878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022853991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053243204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004795417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12086487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318485587","doi":"10.1007/s10670-022-00655-2","title":"Modal-Logical Reconstructions of Thought Experiments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Trinity College, University of Cambridge; Stockholms Universitet; Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam","keywords":"Premise; Counterfactual thinking; Modal; Schema (genetic algorithms); Epistemology; Logical consequence; Philosophy; Logical form; Modal logic; Computer science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.06893828008457106,"score_gpt":0.3660318062416112,"score_spread":0.2970935261570401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318485587","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0725688,0.0028972714,0.5356397,0.052714296,0.0017341678,0.00030915547,0.000706104,0.00083394477,0.3325966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87532693,0.00080908416,0.110170685,0.0036270388,0.00051783083,0.00035005325,0.00032629093,0.00023337682,0.008638733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98726696,0.0084207645,0.00055225985,0.0009487749,0.002377496,0.0004338306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97608256,0.0146251535,0.0012658427,0.0050811647,0.002408228,0.000536918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016794156,0.00080653967,0.0006348632,0.0034577225,0.0027219949,0.0056605176,0.0025417565,0.0035571319,0.0088373255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03874115,0.0009478014,0.0013268896,0.0012183563,0.035151478,0.017039279,0.0060299174,0.00961291,0.0009984557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019922698,0.0000071320037,0.000043801876,0.00001715406,0.0000047274543,0.000038725055,0.0009605933,0.00019642475,0.000100148914,0.9969049,0.00056303124,0.0011434879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002136582,0.0000078358635,0.00007680272,0.000031769287,0.000004876422,0.000048942264,0.00043285394,0.0010356237,0.0003602585,0.9905156,0.0074550225,0.000009149747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010002838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006422642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016794156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004546349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013512823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08881706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321231549","doi":"10.1007/s10670-023-00663-w","title":"Are There “Aesthetic” Judgments?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Argument (complex analysis); Subject (documents); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Ontology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07049591807797442,"score_gpt":0.30303153616032674,"score_spread":0.23253561808235232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321231549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28263676,0.005371172,0.1746322,0.02647414,0.0018057841,0.000089266745,0.00038294875,0.0007622661,0.5078454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746235,0.0009055964,0.01756532,0.0015716638,0.00036995157,0.000054450375,0.00018798793,0.00022829951,0.004493307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966723,0.0008558611,0.00020397578,0.00059774955,0.0014156823,0.00025444556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99116087,0.003342468,0.0011682019,0.0015798281,0.0021469425,0.0006017398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004034091,0.0005121776,0.00047201093,0.0018632574,0.0012932201,0.0056561604,0.002023159,0.0020681836,0.012528521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043477762,0.0006409083,0.00051252823,0.0013695485,0.009172907,0.019558849,0.002734716,0.0026409593,0.0017764805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028521795,0.00014995295,0.011231376,0.00052435393,0.00014160818,0.00029007465,0.006248458,0.0005526867,0.013947141,0.7775624,0.007993728,0.18107304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016315906,0.00003716989,0.018080356,0.0001476005,0.00003195255,0.0004851614,0.0040918384,0.0016058756,0.003125455,0.95624614,0.016072737,0.000059406604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008352144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011032016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012528521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007516405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093481515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04191202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378619954","doi":"10.1007/s10670-023-00698-z","title":"Unconscious Emotions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Consciousness; Phenomenology (philosophy); Psychology; Collective unconscious; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05799442118211639,"score_gpt":0.36647194510377795,"score_spread":0.30847752392166156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378619954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054046277,0.0026536323,0.0372278,0.00472712,0.00084536383,0.000033607943,0.00016859513,0.00023984125,0.9000578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8826363,0.0012637231,0.0058758296,0.0014156266,0.00045086403,0.000068363595,0.00017614322,0.0001588133,0.10795433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932086,0.00019096475,0.000029937162,0.00009755032,0.00027425436,0.00008651699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992834,0.00021995816,0.000082822946,0.00015340523,0.00018059286,0.00007984802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004990479,0.00038646662,0.00022981326,0.0005566603,0.0008658539,0.002982219,0.00033241976,0.0009520498,0.015828729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031762696,0.00013910423,0.00023322877,0.00035235882,0.0029484578,0.0027315253,0.001657878,0.002210181,0.0031628099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005020361,0.00002977235,0.00068042346,0.000094157,0.000013922823,0.00016819511,0.004728118,0.00017686069,0.008592275,0.9416151,0.006792652,0.03705834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020159549,0.00006377857,0.008564532,0.0001560363,0.000029519708,0.0010904178,0.003272714,0.0018881437,0.0064473962,0.8461142,0.13231397,0.000039215116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003052587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026491995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015828729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006464096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043764012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05295235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389741564","doi":"10.1007/s10670-023-00755-7","title":"The Relation Between Moral Reasons and Moral Requirement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Connaught Fund","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Relation (database); Action (physics); Moral reasoning; Epistemology; Moral disengagement; Moral authority; Moral responsibility; Moral philosophy; Moral psychology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.09896765966275493,"score_gpt":0.28998617925492826,"score_spread":0.1910185195921733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389741564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19230178,0.0022663043,0.109033465,0.030384889,0.00039034532,0.00006206799,0.00020739823,0.00009604005,0.66525775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987107,0.00033237867,0.0070895785,0.00069097365,0.00010452666,0.000055503,0.000048512713,0.00004657225,0.0045249886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476385,0.0027453105,0.00028980972,0.0007428385,0.001005151,0.00045302854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694365,0.023397611,0.0022814511,0.0024569652,0.0016721828,0.0007551245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060066096,0.00027307495,0.0005816244,0.0012946103,0.0020183818,0.0041623567,0.0013810291,0.004298533,0.014763787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031350855,0.0005620629,0.00075099245,0.0009282279,0.01404036,0.011723334,0.0028837824,0.0054124775,0.0009173983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002168695,0.00001404919,0.00033906178,0.000024533367,0.000005758017,0.0000324746,0.0003592969,0.00014072555,0.00017261405,0.9963838,0.0004033807,0.002102648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008995019,0.0000060120306,0.0006597146,0.000008157707,0.00000301003,0.0000532878,0.00014049096,0.00031764677,0.000084929336,0.9975708,0.0011413281,0.000005527124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008341053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009486661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014763787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013579425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013565446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04938984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392590770","doi":"10.1007/s10670-024-00792-w","title":"Informational Models of the Phenomenon of Consciousness and the Mechanistic Project in Neuroscience","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Neural dynamics and brain function","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenomenon; Consciousness; Ontology; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Neuroscience; Neurophenomenology; Psychology; Philosophy; Autopoiesis","score_opus":0.02879146779692995,"score_gpt":0.24968138037589507,"score_spread":0.22088991257896512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392590770","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06358702,0.016288958,0.68497056,0.026681896,0.00087647745,0.00004126059,0.00030610498,0.00040366803,0.20684397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406572,0.0047859405,0.044420242,0.00085216673,0.0011557007,0.00011087454,0.00012654605,0.00008218832,0.0078092497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993254,0.00028827743,0.000045599154,0.00009506644,0.000193964,0.000051687515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982432,0.0011111457,0.00012719436,0.0003111833,0.00013099713,0.000076191434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001767336,0.0006601646,0.0006905866,0.001460235,0.00094960013,0.0029337911,0.0013196743,0.0018291702,0.004058468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003895507,0.00031586844,0.0006899451,0.0006675794,0.007973955,0.010695509,0.0018630116,0.0024889507,0.00047613334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003826205,0.0000026032897,0.000019834602,0.000015147113,0.0000019391298,0.000013289604,0.00006692857,0.0004488256,0.00017327681,0.9979399,0.0001794526,0.0011349133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016733707,0.000002250253,0.000031160213,0.0000049977493,0.0000011105426,0.000021519512,0.000018489514,0.0015692305,0.000052979132,0.99759406,0.00070012896,0.0000023036557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041295888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029235258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004058468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008611624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006227384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013576984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398144917","doi":"10.1007/s10670-024-00800-z","title":"The Janusian Nature of Moral Ought","year":2024,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Indexicality; Epistemology; Ontology; Internalism and externalism; Moral disengagement; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.024792118629470377,"score_gpt":0.2636773742916849,"score_spread":0.23888525566221455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398144917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030235915,0.0038534512,0.048319604,0.030127086,0.00072365894,0.000038982384,0.00008305771,0.00007449344,0.88654375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506135,0.0010058347,0.009089756,0.0026335483,0.00080853386,0.00013522901,0.000043183554,0.000080491984,0.035589952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944358,0.0030368182,0.00021745467,0.0007865849,0.0010851078,0.00043830217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935767,0.00411174,0.00033006622,0.0009692635,0.0006678301,0.0003443921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006285463,0.00045582093,0.0008468227,0.0026049775,0.007924165,0.009892009,0.001774551,0.004412488,0.008887289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010340511,0.0006508665,0.0005308403,0.0017308498,0.046903796,0.015529979,0.0053468305,0.006762896,0.0010477139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010277765,0.0000013691048,0.000009841427,0.0000028968639,5.087193e-7,0.0000047536955,0.00032995065,0.000009697465,0.000007874973,0.999121,0.00020325714,0.0003079132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019912713,8.695687e-7,0.000021449117,0.000007530347,8.232895e-7,0.000013808461,0.00016970247,0.000050429786,0.000014678563,0.99585295,0.0038641898,0.0000016525389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019963668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002428949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009892009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032950535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028430829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033241093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402474251","doi":"10.1007/s10670-024-00860-1","title":"Explaining Deontic Status by Good Reasoning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Deontic logic; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.034566074911670026,"score_gpt":0.2666271057852702,"score_spread":0.2320610308736002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402474251","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086029984,0.004755607,0.42892876,0.051615104,0.0007138708,0.00012142047,0.00057693484,0.0004192026,0.42683905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489573,0.0010631734,0.03802753,0.0015572887,0.0005287122,0.00011810119,0.00027762426,0.00017819063,0.0092920065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917516,0.0043715355,0.0005509937,0.0011571469,0.0014651553,0.00070348004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97747916,0.014679283,0.0010723775,0.0046916283,0.001528505,0.00054904487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013490996,0.0007598838,0.0013735214,0.0034198149,0.00438545,0.0087713525,0.0031797604,0.005288511,0.011403106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027142514,0.0011677988,0.001712339,0.0020369117,0.0294735,0.030232003,0.006997431,0.007356885,0.0013381552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047136823,0.0000032276423,0.000035481473,0.000011236116,0.000002351176,0.000010228443,0.00027444365,0.00016996011,0.000022065515,0.9986203,0.00022556528,0.00062045216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031609159,8.1001315e-7,0.000015371386,0.000006811644,0.0000013825754,0.0000055128876,0.000056245663,0.00033838328,0.000022873264,0.9985642,0.000983281,0.0000019838806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004294604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033851166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013490996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004225809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028821894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07134801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403107760","doi":"10.1007/s10670-024-00871-y","title":"The Myth of the Aesthetic","year":2024,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Ontology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.01536288790054545,"score_gpt":0.2624410588450333,"score_spread":0.24707817094448786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403107760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025109896,0.042762548,0.11406616,0.17883547,0.0074177138,0.000046030076,0.0003362397,0.00038958277,0.63103634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8484276,0.012385418,0.04299234,0.02010346,0.00918069,0.00026687855,0.00021929038,0.00040745997,0.06601678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978538,0.0010068252,0.00009036151,0.0003859285,0.00053988484,0.00012310136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713045,0.0016050633,0.0001415175,0.0005000038,0.0004312315,0.00019172262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033246963,0.00061217294,0.00050641556,0.0022651928,0.0024426267,0.006199773,0.0015750681,0.0031419697,0.0072892224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066915387,0.00030985157,0.0004547505,0.0007732276,0.040780142,0.012348912,0.0034284324,0.0065645166,0.0014601377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012911833,0.0000053841936,0.000082561724,0.000035398654,0.000004139456,0.000026810105,0.0012455125,0.00008076579,0.00016818532,0.98777384,0.004864462,0.005699979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057288153,0.0000072667035,0.00016410906,0.000063242536,0.0000023837133,0.00015397856,0.00054048136,0.00027777557,0.00012400461,0.94618696,0.052465905,0.000008205164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009958782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007691368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072892224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017940003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014787813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024384916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403923111","doi":"10.1007/s10670-024-00882-9","title":"Compatibilism, Manipulation, and the Hard-Line Reply","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibilism; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Line (geometry); Determinism; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05231579343661301,"score_gpt":0.26946196572436093,"score_spread":0.2171461722877479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403923111","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019649703,0.009590841,0.034045294,0.56401366,0.0032297368,0.000029882716,0.00014286884,0.00013719004,0.36916083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8944189,0.002526827,0.0062837442,0.0607097,0.005902542,0.00014341556,0.00007368803,0.00020864313,0.029732548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943869,0.003174074,0.00022653223,0.0009171454,0.00087724574,0.00041817757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870459,0.009856884,0.00061587343,0.0014656917,0.0007181273,0.00029758993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007929471,0.0007310138,0.0011157724,0.0014264428,0.0046529365,0.0060906042,0.0018296359,0.015081614,0.01378932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028740102,0.00047716426,0.0007659019,0.0009711957,0.020498004,0.015738823,0.0053790854,0.012303712,0.0020956444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002374314,0.0000043638615,0.000041957985,0.000019094387,0.00000681093,0.000041879466,0.0004899078,0.000047880243,0.00007265345,0.9906488,0.006687306,0.0019155843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015708714,0.0000031953166,0.000047466525,0.000019761004,0.0000031123177,0.00004550242,0.00020211624,0.00015001364,0.00006834737,0.9837143,0.015722826,0.000007644288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013739615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010730553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015081614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026198667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011842478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046129882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404963605","doi":"10.1007/s10670-024-00889-2","title":"Artworks, Functions, and Pluralism About ‘Artifact’","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Artifact (error); Epistemology; Ontology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.013677158189161709,"score_gpt":0.2849102858897082,"score_spread":0.2712331277005465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404963605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12898473,0.0042698737,0.076543525,0.03844537,0.00060363696,0.000048080325,0.00011526372,0.00014745392,0.75084203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98432815,0.0003224958,0.0042025037,0.00072539627,0.00017442547,0.000038701208,0.000036178746,0.00009397289,0.010078149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99035573,0.006116446,0.00048013616,0.0011414451,0.0012132685,0.0006929345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881522,0.007579073,0.000721637,0.0024949657,0.00071008253,0.00034203564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011243357,0.00053790945,0.00064979115,0.0034389044,0.0101232985,0.018118773,0.0018964236,0.005816255,0.005343859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012001355,0.00053420255,0.0007757532,0.0024692137,0.10361581,0.019218272,0.005735588,0.005852757,0.00055104267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063639727,0.000003702964,0.00009917649,0.000010860019,0.0000023805453,0.000022208103,0.012617652,0.000052330615,0.00006255054,0.9854145,0.00044019648,0.001268033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008508307,0.000008141183,0.00023717446,0.000043605396,0.000007699938,0.000094495364,0.008295248,0.00019161854,0.00023184475,0.9658058,0.025066327,0.000009479054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038105117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003705517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018118773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004027626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025426669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059461296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411259684","doi":"10.1007/s10670-025-00976-y","title":"Kripke Attractors","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Cambridge Commonwealth Trust; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Ontology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03458584843995181,"score_gpt":0.36652142606050525,"score_spread":0.3319355776205534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411259684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44710484,0.0023044762,0.31940907,0.0052996054,0.0002449251,0.00010208702,0.0011496297,0.0007462285,0.22363909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833031,0.00043727804,0.011155494,0.000103296625,0.000063255575,0.000056131732,0.00015135837,0.00003525138,0.0046948176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993943,0.0001385493,0.000047674446,0.00017592397,0.00014632591,0.00009728054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984133,0.00080255244,0.00023377647,0.00022658154,0.00021530481,0.000108440814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007060445,0.00037592978,0.0006208624,0.0020327875,0.0013726942,0.0026235252,0.00045108076,0.0010377641,0.0064992765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038831597,0.0002950502,0.0008984948,0.0007788022,0.0034748244,0.0049120486,0.0018309932,0.0015192826,0.0006662952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007934396,0.0000031696218,0.00019569478,0.00001960298,0.0000071417976,0.000069088346,0.00023710955,0.0031068937,0.00029323186,0.9940416,0.00033669913,0.0016816601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051374545,0.0000071218074,0.00021213718,0.000015576315,0.000007037473,0.00006767927,0.00011510371,0.01342201,0.00017687054,0.9826058,0.0033571604,0.000008269181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00133396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009916854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064992765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015524573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004221538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021742284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411274175","doi":"10.1007/s10670-025-00977-x","title":"Epistemic Rationality Begins Unreflectively","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Rationality; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05687095642354797,"score_gpt":0.3090321360568537,"score_spread":0.25216117963330575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411274175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21246696,0.0033846223,0.21850394,0.034823135,0.00036098747,0.00010524056,0.0001459338,0.00049565814,0.5297135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97883976,0.00036128427,0.012415086,0.0007683157,0.00006855071,0.00004447652,0.00003577615,0.000085900065,0.00738088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924861,0.00346141,0.0003802594,0.0013654975,0.0016078948,0.00069876574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874094,0.007440505,0.0008799961,0.0024179397,0.0015138297,0.00033830444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074705724,0.00047646704,0.0005232849,0.0013397869,0.002391559,0.0058662863,0.00094530336,0.0024909521,0.003023333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017874595,0.00045818667,0.0005705315,0.00049080775,0.036831666,0.009985465,0.00656932,0.0050247484,0.00068108377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009977922,0.000006164679,0.0003169219,0.000025911284,0.000005508745,0.000098710145,0.007438254,0.00013006399,0.0003517919,0.9871732,0.00028386866,0.004159643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046847604,0.000006802954,0.00022749868,0.00003711063,0.0000046854084,0.00007370005,0.0012338499,0.0002598731,0.00041277966,0.98562443,0.012106921,0.0000077186505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015629014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010494201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074705724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027840976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002347746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03950864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414394958","doi":"10.1007/s10670-025-01016-5","title":"What Good Are Knowledge Norms?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Canada First Research Excellence Fund","keywords":"Normative; Norm (philosophy); Ontology; Ask price; Social knowledge; Social ontology","score_opus":0.05003477379501068,"score_gpt":0.29401917793687593,"score_spread":0.24398440414186526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414394958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06994234,0.026759123,0.13181092,0.32915342,0.002456053,0.00013757488,0.00052572123,0.00039013167,0.43882474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96524054,0.00404054,0.018068293,0.006812211,0.0015471294,0.0002295665,0.00015513883,0.00015904398,0.003747617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93894774,0.038716078,0.003265377,0.004843402,0.012003305,0.0022241469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77253866,0.16678399,0.017609116,0.017846327,0.020345498,0.0048763445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045140587,0.00078596396,0.002003647,0.0055301148,0.006173089,0.024105564,0.002875831,0.008270432,0.005688819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15465194,0.00071186875,0.00067503983,0.0032519319,0.06216523,0.04672398,0.004867138,0.0069493772,0.0012572196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021829284,0.000026167452,0.00073179154,0.00011997111,0.000023022681,0.000021115582,0.002572403,0.0001800832,0.00005125357,0.98349965,0.0019923446,0.010760369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009334955,0.000005326069,0.00025175276,0.00015642704,0.0000080982145,0.000020118001,0.0016124727,0.00022899955,0.00007864994,0.99100715,0.006611113,0.000010562486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004095014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034767238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045140587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061828555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008522139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23872906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415655044","doi":"10.1007/s10670-025-01033-4","title":"Epistemic Virtue, Cognitive Diversity, and the Division of Labor","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Diversity (politics); Ideal (ethics); Focus (optics); Function (biology); Ontology; Incentive; Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.01649393117350226,"score_gpt":0.3059246790391962,"score_spread":0.2894307478656939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415655044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27610797,0.00941771,0.046412498,0.04115284,0.00039870339,0.000036340996,0.00010963654,0.00005326916,0.62631106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587893,0.00046376153,0.0014131422,0.0003851171,0.00009451613,0.000027534263,0.000011217032,0.000012067952,0.001713652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991598,0.0055190264,0.0002507134,0.0008041094,0.0011118053,0.0007162282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775359,0.01762221,0.0015782941,0.0017308489,0.00080165605,0.0007311712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010027596,0.00043899365,0.0007253741,0.0030359754,0.005583361,0.010303013,0.0013638982,0.002697333,0.006294174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017092766,0.0002906742,0.00038607445,0.0019723554,0.06575621,0.012513229,0.0071977093,0.0032676945,0.00028824952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018827866,0.000018139799,0.0004902658,0.000026670366,0.0000043634323,0.0000182917,0.008846449,0.00006880664,0.00009091221,0.9867187,0.0002563985,0.0034421717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010371434,0.0000086276095,0.00078074116,0.000054966957,0.000003898605,0.00004507316,0.009206441,0.00013998606,0.00011244099,0.9855848,0.004045348,0.0000072145117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015229456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001638527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010303013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026578535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027921228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053031683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416158735","doi":"10.1007/s10670-025-01028-1","title":"What Constitutes Phenomenal Character?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Character (mathematics); Internalism and externalism; Property (philosophy); Philosophy of mind; Naturalism; Ontology","score_opus":0.01611382243412528,"score_gpt":0.32686769471460253,"score_spread":0.31075387228047724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416158735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1861646,0.0048399465,0.053670246,0.055208355,0.00093361083,0.00008669402,0.0005246255,0.0003827568,0.69818914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918202,0.0007260148,0.0023664862,0.0008109854,0.00022228631,0.000039277384,0.00011585691,0.00007259909,0.003826291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979894,0.0008622306,0.00011760028,0.0004071223,0.0003646613,0.000259015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955467,0.0022509084,0.000621206,0.0006407776,0.0005716106,0.0003689188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018595275,0.00034943028,0.00053318363,0.0020260832,0.0022493738,0.00716503,0.00091873,0.0022676243,0.007606996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080432175,0.00031571006,0.00034498947,0.0013943414,0.02665239,0.019342303,0.0030311835,0.0031511155,0.0010592362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015724914,0.000012154515,0.0008232687,0.00006674098,0.000006885801,0.00007203933,0.004497731,0.000035327583,0.00030000907,0.98799753,0.0009491172,0.005223404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007629914,0.000013367808,0.0012444041,0.0000586033,0.000007686859,0.0003295271,0.005002095,0.00022742455,0.0002852747,0.9771993,0.015613007,0.000011619859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064754725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043873265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007606996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015225607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008930635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025447905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W86245326","doi":"10.1023/a:1016379820371","title":"Wittgenstein on Gödel: The Newly Published Remarks","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03961403250614903,"score_gpt":0.2065018461832415,"score_spread":0.16688781367709246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W86245326","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070187855,0.06755015,0.0060113366,0.7024642,0.028758442,0.000013667079,0.00023421543,0.00010320208,0.18784603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3113009,0.05632841,0.005451844,0.35287112,0.12361595,0.00011016168,0.00036033266,0.0005827981,0.14937854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986142,0.0005144728,0.000071876726,0.00024154675,0.00040344094,0.0001543988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672866,0.002244992,0.00019981305,0.00022382889,0.00046078325,0.00014184132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027993957,0.00046670856,0.000638879,0.0016172625,0.0029942305,0.004992677,0.0015315746,0.0059331865,0.013041305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009658351,0.00022664778,0.0005302285,0.0017532811,0.009996365,0.010008986,0.0028822895,0.0079523325,0.0020679238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003227601,0.0000110936935,0.00010350863,0.00012308259,0.00001266489,0.0001291273,0.001210549,0.000054326872,0.00008462829,0.79850847,0.19257839,0.007151683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013950669,0.000008526718,0.0004939402,0.00021186075,0.000014774045,0.00015052348,0.00085048645,0.00011124475,0.0001977696,0.49207672,0.50584835,0.00002189689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021192136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030439831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013041305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014975572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008747906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04362756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}