{"meta":{"query_hash":"454823d15907","filters":{"venue":"Ethics"},"cohort_total":43,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":43,"exported":43,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/454823d15907","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W2050353949","doi":"10.1086/662294","title":"Desert and Avoidability in Self-Defense","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Morality; Relevance (law); Self defense; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.2551081103067132,"score_gpt":0.2924957985916468,"score_spread":0.03738768828493361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050353949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11878243,0.019298933,0.019684164,0.091002986,0.000684208,0.000026101887,0.000030054263,0.00006558541,0.75042546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97839236,0.0012592762,0.0013975182,0.003106209,0.0001452999,0.00001629438,0.0000053551908,0.00002708639,0.015650537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969969,0.0020611896,0.000064575936,0.00019901225,0.00034332168,0.00033501748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971481,0.0016640193,0.00031961204,0.0002398251,0.0003330531,0.00029539756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002754988,0.00024248702,0.00032050477,0.0006479451,0.004769289,0.0038345885,0.00058009144,0.0022348887,0.004119909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003953082,0.00015191059,0.00025281773,0.00047796892,0.031267114,0.0041034296,0.00348238,0.0038189287,0.00039552109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007783637,0.00000612715,0.0002612516,0.000018262866,0.000002943713,0.000041333285,0.002570295,0.00008752468,0.00007123996,0.9925039,0.002101817,0.002327581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008056467,0.000015623007,0.0006361252,0.00007565496,0.0000052223036,0.00013180739,0.0024227211,0.00021847275,0.00021854462,0.9248215,0.071434066,0.000012133826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003502761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058377464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004769289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003092778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013125633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022439778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091245296","doi":"10.1086/664939","title":"Teichmann, Roger. <i>Nature, Reason, and the Good Life: Ethics for Human Beings</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Pp. 224. $65.00 (cloth).","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hacker; Download; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Media studies; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.11275885111211387,"score_gpt":0.4540705135994523,"score_spread":0.3413116624873384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091245296","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056520035,0.86367285,0.0031372197,0.06705344,0.010256211,0.000032170916,0.00048757947,0.00025407033,0.05454133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03819534,0.78846526,0.0056052613,0.013508203,0.0076515027,0.00014369804,0.00048608065,0.0004951917,0.14544953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924326,0.00020716233,0.00010039636,0.000098898134,0.00028192243,0.00006828075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970625,0.0016264786,0.0002309417,0.00011939603,0.00075011805,0.00021049212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014299545,0.0012764352,0.0007550749,0.0020870783,0.001747681,0.0026663293,0.0012016646,0.0031638204,0.027589953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063419947,0.00097335683,0.0005743554,0.002159397,0.0024284155,0.007894042,0.0012562046,0.0049338983,0.017256957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029177256,0.000010413209,0.0001097405,0.00035488792,0.000011995649,0.00007971329,0.0007437224,0.00010292387,0.000126667,0.018099824,0.90929943,0.071031645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015087877,0.000014823678,0.00086413283,0.0012344422,0.00002538216,0.00036634115,0.0007137048,0.00010094829,0.00027677842,0.034525674,0.9618382,0.000024532914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013449428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01971898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027589953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019354214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026632142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092297554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314031533","doi":"10.1086/656500","title":"Beitz, Charles, and Goodin, Robert, eds. <i>Global Basic Rights</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. 272. $85.00.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Permission; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02018214438300254,"score_gpt":0.28212551708887307,"score_spread":0.26194337270587054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314031533","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017177047,0.9643037,0.0006796454,0.010861308,0.002444216,0.000010747302,0.00013656406,0.00005791101,0.02133417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033244009,0.9609342,0.0011273326,0.0017108779,0.0021984286,0.00003682876,0.00021707396,0.00008096392,0.030369798],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911493,0.0002363359,0.00008201698,0.000080599486,0.00040041536,0.00008560776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736255,0.001652627,0.00021670763,0.000084149724,0.00046568585,0.00021818621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020599302,0.0026298973,0.0020566091,0.004633816,0.002033634,0.0051716133,0.0018641771,0.0035798196,0.03767595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038835485,0.0018610911,0.00072520546,0.005603297,0.0026781287,0.011047169,0.0020251868,0.0047815037,0.026137637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058459103,0.000025704145,0.00032912978,0.0012535482,0.000021840573,0.00006469735,0.001059404,0.00019414972,0.00011466003,0.01408148,0.8183881,0.16440889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014324928,0.00001707225,0.0014357056,0.0035912448,0.00004103286,0.0003861887,0.0009762084,0.00014209242,0.00020472339,0.026322857,0.9668393,0.000029160297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014962116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033139847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03767595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002907096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036319345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12603861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317017778","doi":"10.1086/657959","title":"Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. <i>Limits of Legality: The Ethics of Lawless Judging</i>.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Pp. 354. $65.00 (cloth).","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2193559932793061,"score_gpt":0.3851364791892516,"score_spread":0.16578048590994549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317017778","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014668908,0.63744795,0.0038519448,0.23923647,0.013748873,0.00003679925,0.0006342174,0.00028052306,0.103296325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08311896,0.640671,0.005567122,0.047608566,0.014253671,0.00012059964,0.00053454784,0.0007464377,0.20737907],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921477,0.0002085396,0.00006537167,0.000079160396,0.00035903743,0.00007312697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929541,0.003945062,0.0002619428,0.00019330998,0.002101439,0.00054421375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017874286,0.0009325351,0.0006707263,0.0028048214,0.0028324071,0.0038351167,0.0016712744,0.005328315,0.04116482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009430119,0.0012112441,0.00049739314,0.0022309686,0.0041563977,0.01311023,0.0017013662,0.007909042,0.016818779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002755942,0.000014633237,0.00021954221,0.0002468822,0.000008069273,0.00006941573,0.0011107936,0.00007240886,0.00010733256,0.02274411,0.92287916,0.052500054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024780738,0.000016175005,0.0019857963,0.0014257189,0.000023254543,0.00030388226,0.0017660874,0.00011977521,0.00031781205,0.05454474,0.9394365,0.000035505404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031089325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060401313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04116482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021542062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033760685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13771003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320147873","doi":"10.1086/666531","title":"Kamm, F. M. <i>Ethics for Enemies: Terror, Torture, and War</i>Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Pp. 178. $35.00 (cloth).","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Download; Permission; Law; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Human rights; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1417600390908812,"score_gpt":0.29682872230103996,"score_spread":0.15506868321015876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320147873","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006231931,0.8110445,0.0019165188,0.06498917,0.008322319,0.000022277893,0.00045352837,0.00020576436,0.112422824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04101367,0.66723996,0.004472495,0.018627156,0.008947222,0.00011806355,0.00045146092,0.00038360513,0.2587464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994892,0.00016892108,0.000046406498,0.000044015593,0.00019268061,0.000058814785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853384,0.0007722847,0.00013551814,0.00007384884,0.00035241258,0.00013213343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010748641,0.0010402467,0.0005704056,0.0024813714,0.0019361123,0.0029986708,0.00095642376,0.0032478229,0.0456409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038472996,0.00093754556,0.000488629,0.0019780651,0.0028019086,0.009000319,0.001537726,0.004438537,0.023013439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027735332,0.000009267201,0.00013050808,0.00035161935,0.000009470017,0.00005198441,0.00092716434,0.00007213282,0.00012269725,0.025779871,0.9177813,0.05473624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007788078,0.00001217939,0.0013094359,0.0012267829,0.000012753342,0.00023156183,0.00078930886,0.00006344371,0.00022554309,0.031020535,0.9650846,0.000016061043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011583776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022493642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0456409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022827075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021618775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15268409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324111193","doi":"10.1086/656509","title":"McMahon, Christopher. <i>Reasonable Disagreement: A Theory of Political Morality</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pp. 212. $90.00 (cloth).","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Politics; Download; Political philosophy; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Media studies; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.05282347929712096,"score_gpt":0.31789733002746806,"score_spread":0.2650738507303471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324111193","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010577872,0.72859544,0.0047766594,0.1356462,0.006547769,0.000051358158,0.0012491482,0.0002840192,0.12179172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08506688,0.7043694,0.007857545,0.02416975,0.010508944,0.00030181085,0.0011206204,0.0007393855,0.16586563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988765,0.00041228475,0.0000895556,0.000121953446,0.00038113454,0.00011850564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407023,0.0034763906,0.00037627495,0.00025055947,0.0014146173,0.00041195395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020116982,0.0017859006,0.0010958966,0.004836682,0.004984452,0.004359883,0.003459111,0.006068211,0.064614944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009671714,0.0021152676,0.0008308751,0.005988797,0.0058353283,0.013884472,0.0023801439,0.007664054,0.020910138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003591349,0.00001882629,0.00027124764,0.0004168772,0.000020260668,0.00010940411,0.0014397188,0.00017681708,0.000083883606,0.04527593,0.9009798,0.051171225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003981388,0.00001624115,0.0027322324,0.002242179,0.00005003595,0.0002730332,0.001309274,0.00023521339,0.00029044176,0.12764314,0.8651121,0.00005631087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062245935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106326886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064614944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005480049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046586352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21615857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324475652","doi":"10.1086/657967","title":"Korsgaard, Christine M. <i>Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity</i>.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. xiv+230. $35.00 (paper).","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Identity (music); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.10334888780950187,"score_gpt":0.2813579560327743,"score_spread":0.17800906822327245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324475652","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007838944,0.8247821,0.0024948143,0.093323775,0.006928167,0.00001987658,0.00034162207,0.00011545606,0.07121034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06590055,0.7841548,0.0041724215,0.017144414,0.0062136296,0.00010132783,0.00037877588,0.0003278854,0.12160624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993185,0.00025237017,0.00008355296,0.00006974663,0.00021512958,0.000060760514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649954,0.002108502,0.00020725952,0.00015441666,0.0007502725,0.00027998522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015161956,0.00097361935,0.0007903693,0.0022953136,0.0023618438,0.0032867766,0.0015034053,0.0031883612,0.029972153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00509613,0.00080741703,0.00040463134,0.0021138168,0.004528092,0.00966346,0.0017919682,0.0054967846,0.011673799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003995486,0.000012942307,0.00019838853,0.0005701198,0.000017165945,0.00013115608,0.0022790565,0.00010689539,0.0001223357,0.07361952,0.849834,0.073068574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015362803,0.000012239303,0.0015859224,0.0019303738,0.000021125907,0.0004657568,0.0025192602,0.00008644218,0.00031102347,0.13263597,0.86039114,0.000025447616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013097743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025400745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029972153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020896401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025878649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100266874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324775572","doi":"10.1086/670936","title":"Nuccitelli, Susana, and Seay, Gary, eds. <i>Ethical Naturalism: Current Debates</i>.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Pp. 270. $90.00 (cloth).","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Naturalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07028475651126415,"score_gpt":0.4159039267057364,"score_spread":0.34561917019447225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324775572","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011583892,0.97451514,0.0004950572,0.012876523,0.0026083775,0.000007401557,0.000057650945,0.00003517141,0.0092887655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020975468,0.9802737,0.0008752815,0.0019492866,0.0034820181,0.000027928094,0.00009963603,0.000055183154,0.01113936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988482,0.00040070497,0.000098345234,0.00011689594,0.00042104238,0.00011482098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944787,0.0036256975,0.00037125507,0.00016106565,0.00090235163,0.00046089216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027010967,0.002472227,0.0021337008,0.0041852756,0.0019974227,0.005621542,0.002588479,0.003735617,0.026058132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007088208,0.0019750136,0.001025594,0.0054394817,0.0032517153,0.012049255,0.0025676505,0.0065324563,0.019728232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072460265,0.00002989853,0.00033129155,0.0019574938,0.000029807195,0.0001233602,0.0013464619,0.00015072234,0.00008355219,0.0114158215,0.81969774,0.16476145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017626362,0.000016950169,0.0013708078,0.004534788,0.00005057332,0.00078136893,0.0010247546,0.00014938136,0.00014722328,0.023204826,0.96866834,0.000033292505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017422743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03270231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026058132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027213786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052296105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087173164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328636456","doi":"10.1086/669489","title":"Kisner, Matthew J. <i>Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life</i>.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Pp. 261. $85.00.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Download; Permission; Sociology; Personal autonomy; Human rights; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07001448226231942,"score_gpt":0.25889457218199013,"score_spread":0.1888800899196707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328636456","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004330516,0.8305954,0.0015787885,0.074951954,0.008151696,0.00001538624,0.00024596092,0.00014658466,0.08388123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032485984,0.7350587,0.0022534176,0.018615277,0.007243531,0.000068068024,0.00031229906,0.00038628533,0.2035764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993637,0.00016527962,0.000063566076,0.000089388304,0.00024089197,0.00007715739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978021,0.001151877,0.00018381917,0.00011902908,0.00052862003,0.00021457954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011808359,0.0012671086,0.00088931154,0.0031715354,0.0025886365,0.0037830235,0.0015260079,0.0029132515,0.032191273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003266072,0.0010389027,0.00044681085,0.0032802692,0.005913566,0.015170842,0.0022706902,0.0058411537,0.015838418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026933241,0.000011623182,0.00012601976,0.0003621909,0.000008812137,0.000054474967,0.0014760112,0.000065574946,0.00007836073,0.05593192,0.8988826,0.04297537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008076156,0.000007045472,0.0009271902,0.0011359344,0.000013401104,0.00020424882,0.0015072828,0.000042235675,0.00013463522,0.057957467,0.93804467,0.000017736114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015390064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03072989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032191273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036321797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003015104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10769057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331411158","doi":"10.1086/662051","title":"Dworkin, Ronald. <i>Justice for Hedgehogs</i>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011. Pp. 506. $35.00 (cloth).","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Permission; Political science; Law; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.18944154517648118,"score_gpt":0.2715142025469825,"score_spread":0.08207265737050132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331411158","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006893939,0.8171445,0.002058802,0.06921095,0.0056867898,0.000022977112,0.0005616979,0.00016515114,0.104459755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031663798,0.73329365,0.0032764636,0.013656065,0.003776886,0.0001084303,0.00038254343,0.00038295478,0.21345924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952614,0.00013008469,0.00004610405,0.000062621075,0.00016861266,0.00006648538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983341,0.00078732753,0.000121146586,0.000081784485,0.0005038839,0.00017171043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011328927,0.0009673384,0.0007139011,0.0023814724,0.0032134189,0.0036010188,0.0011047033,0.0028603831,0.048950914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045474563,0.0009995988,0.00035465538,0.0023623933,0.0034687582,0.009862672,0.0013775043,0.004792865,0.019562587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002467095,0.000011717286,0.00016876908,0.00026434628,0.0000070767023,0.00006124104,0.00088444405,0.000044534176,0.00008050742,0.027413312,0.9009427,0.07009671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006027641,0.0000050551744,0.00064576627,0.0007523749,0.0000083868235,0.00011417392,0.0009208024,0.000023957136,0.00011009925,0.023983935,0.97341824,0.000011150074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023965508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05838837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048950914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025655741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035536198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16375709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334278313","doi":"10.1086/673504","title":"Murphy, Timothy F. <i>Ethics, Sexual Orientation, and Choices about Children</i>.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012. Pp. 194. $27.00 (cloth).","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Sexual orientation; Permission; Orientation (vector space); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0419001357368044,"score_gpt":0.3569268610519801,"score_spread":0.3150267253151757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334278313","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054965226,0.84715784,0.00075264415,0.10001482,0.006830875,0.00002572525,0.00044653655,0.00018472997,0.044037145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018988052,0.8366754,0.0016609349,0.019083548,0.0068932567,0.00009905555,0.00033096605,0.000207234,0.1160616],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995198,0.00014135291,0.000046165842,0.0000353102,0.0002041339,0.00005328819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727005,0.0012895948,0.00026096604,0.00008102367,0.0007454223,0.0003530002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010995489,0.00090242946,0.00056296686,0.0025345206,0.0017059045,0.002254478,0.0013053854,0.0022442227,0.034327324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059059043,0.0009605733,0.00047001164,0.0020163618,0.0015121901,0.005724433,0.0012160068,0.0043318826,0.017990695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015251272,0.0000078807925,0.00015996762,0.0001923553,0.0000040750133,0.00003845287,0.0004290603,0.000019367724,0.000036566085,0.001997579,0.9519357,0.045163613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069323637,0.000012897645,0.002670583,0.0016392953,0.000015144418,0.0004226167,0.0012421609,0.000031693562,0.0001413975,0.007091325,0.98670816,0.00001778319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027561177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057243463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034327324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015447778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025689844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114836335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508103237","doi":"10.1086/233378","title":"Book ReviewsAlan Gewirth, .<i>Self‐Fulfillment</i>. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998. Pp. 217. $37.50 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Permission; Library science; Management; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Physics; Economics","score_opus":0.0591796670968227,"score_gpt":0.36063943770693324,"score_spread":0.30145977061011053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508103237","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083294435,0.62248474,0.0025824495,0.044715993,0.012865656,0.00005901699,0.0011402852,0.00034521273,0.31497368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0075353673,0.3836095,0.0024732354,0.009249248,0.0038337666,0.00008126985,0.00097286946,0.00033162476,0.5919132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999724,0.00005157978,0.000018723213,0.000037351034,0.0001404912,0.000027899445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919504,0.000379593,0.000063472115,0.000032515298,0.0002455031,0.00008383707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042215703,0.00095683755,0.0006548342,0.0020014618,0.0011737993,0.0025142783,0.0007808849,0.0012544899,0.071848765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020103822,0.00047592755,0.0003494386,0.0021447886,0.0011962679,0.0036069208,0.00082892075,0.0023169077,0.04093398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009576769,0.000009886462,0.00005027861,0.000204123,0.0000032832047,0.000027008591,0.00018929492,0.00003739287,0.00008100912,0.008601263,0.93239,0.058396894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001945682,0.0000057315083,0.000299283,0.00036785117,0.0000046144087,0.0001241602,0.00015740874,0.00003081615,0.000071152615,0.0060572946,0.99287355,0.000006128333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007920402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02793038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071848765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016232954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018977824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24035805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508937116","doi":"10.1086/233289","title":"Book ReviewElliott Sober, , and David Sloan Wilson, .<i>Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior</i>. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998. Pp. 394. $29.95 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Download; Art history; Sociology; Media studies; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.06946279802970198,"score_gpt":0.2949337000046876,"score_spread":0.22547090197498562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508937116","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035329288,0.74616677,0.0014481677,0.043827474,0.026661308,0.00005935279,0.0019874896,0.00025941423,0.17923675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028252269,0.4526027,0.0012805684,0.01189208,0.016045805,0.000062460385,0.0013848392,0.00020445645,0.5137019],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971825,0.000026258642,0.000017336546,0.00005021263,0.00016551571,0.00002240997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884915,0.00035996357,0.00008421216,0.000037168462,0.0005416178,0.0001278476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043863224,0.0010786564,0.00089190993,0.002816462,0.00068373984,0.002032541,0.0014088202,0.0013151102,0.10784588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020914895,0.00048094045,0.00045578709,0.0033869122,0.00064387394,0.00230849,0.00069484464,0.002111162,0.08374945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047212716,0.0000063683365,0.000031249998,0.00015145715,0.0000022981044,0.000012617919,0.000019984309,0.000025257064,0.000046129047,0.0016531566,0.962155,0.035891846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016818486,0.000003822104,0.00019392162,0.0001746844,0.0000027653944,0.00008375001,0.000014817618,0.000015021007,0.000029915947,0.001000259,0.99847645,0.0000030196488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010569172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023547504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10784588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017118582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001993349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36078036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510645367","doi":"10.1086/339591","title":"Book ReviewsJerome Neu, . <i>A Tear Is an Intellectual Thing: The Meanings of Emotion</i>.New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Pp. 342. $49.95 (cloth).","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Queen (butterfly); Download; Media studies; Permission; Sociology; Art history; Art; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1811916182180168,"score_gpt":0.32632235914875957,"score_spread":0.14513074093074277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510645367","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039184047,0.6660152,0.0011539607,0.024542248,0.029691078,0.000043425352,0.0013285922,0.00027064583,0.27656305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027477376,0.36804622,0.0009322295,0.009478461,0.0127020115,0.000052589334,0.0010896062,0.00021176712,0.60473937],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997557,0.000027270087,0.000015143909,0.00003557497,0.00014642936,0.00001987793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999073,0.00034217152,0.000060075225,0.00003657662,0.00038701296,0.000101111276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029573965,0.0012855766,0.0007840736,0.0026436576,0.00072092214,0.0022211317,0.0010994965,0.0013464579,0.14643207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016022429,0.00040767278,0.00052974926,0.0025179281,0.0005942859,0.0022485564,0.0006644767,0.0018656568,0.08580745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006940118,0.000009885594,0.000036683967,0.0002481327,0.0000028404177,0.000029567813,0.000042882053,0.000031869484,0.000068592926,0.0017381482,0.95590377,0.04188071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019617032,0.000004081065,0.00019704184,0.00027643354,0.000003239627,0.00015833903,0.000028287792,0.000016555576,0.000034164575,0.0010483782,0.99822825,0.0000032180967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005910996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01505386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14643207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012461453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013148065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4898641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510913775","doi":"10.1086/233327","title":"Book ReviewJules L. Coleman, , and Christopher Morris, , eds.<i>Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. pp. 253. $54.95 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Economic Justice; Sociology; Media studies; Art history; Law and economics; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.054390975925838685,"score_gpt":0.3253019295358414,"score_spread":0.2709109536100027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510913775","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001632075,0.86909145,0.00055349985,0.022915585,0.011353712,0.000041746327,0.00089604285,0.00012021733,0.09486455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014294807,0.82274014,0.0007058103,0.006845857,0.00911949,0.00006145043,0.001161013,0.00012244908,0.15781437],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995066,0.00005090414,0.000033184882,0.000070605085,0.00030302026,0.000035658144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789643,0.0008605205,0.00014146072,0.00006750636,0.00087051635,0.00016356126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006110324,0.0011884776,0.0014456476,0.004670668,0.0009848117,0.003072548,0.001830095,0.0016067589,0.090172336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003226673,0.0005826112,0.00060722686,0.009181409,0.0007215559,0.0037438998,0.0009991665,0.0022359088,0.067335114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000462488,0.0000065336867,0.000027296514,0.00047973852,0.0000034813077,0.000018353647,0.00003505306,0.000043409636,0.000027053242,0.0015013749,0.9510781,0.04677494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021013018,0.0000031321404,0.00013521327,0.0005818512,0.0000046710916,0.000071897906,0.000023324521,0.000012019873,0.000012442769,0.0008181823,0.99833137,0.0000038215167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011272449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025682334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090172336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020495553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033809654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30165648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512672195","doi":"10.1086/233437","title":"Book ReviewsPatricia Smith, .<i>Liberalism and Affirmative Obligation</i>. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Pp. 271. $49.95 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Obligation; Liberalism; Download; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.06357273097434996,"score_gpt":0.3112157524176009,"score_spread":0.24764302144325095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512672195","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037305654,0.6666071,0.0014298491,0.064800225,0.02492793,0.00006829307,0.0015919682,0.00025057848,0.23995106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038145247,0.54735816,0.0012462791,0.019742591,0.018388389,0.00008911636,0.0016923866,0.0002644735,0.40740407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994711,0.000079153826,0.000031035925,0.0000665708,0.00031036267,0.000041803967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770963,0.00093071314,0.00013853383,0.0000677093,0.0010256061,0.0001278019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005223687,0.0011549812,0.00094199425,0.0031288245,0.0009889548,0.0024061324,0.0012024598,0.0015645504,0.09443153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031182976,0.00047680666,0.00044464308,0.0053109075,0.00080374384,0.003546249,0.0006804558,0.0021828513,0.05121235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003386891,0.0000056544873,0.000019868596,0.00019851938,0.0000019963704,0.000012816537,0.000044290042,0.000026104424,0.000028145188,0.0023461173,0.97520626,0.022106905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025325905,0.000004464428,0.0002102014,0.00039887195,0.0000034484906,0.000085337175,0.00004430195,0.000020001235,0.00003748222,0.0019821685,0.99720675,0.000004374043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023046963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09443153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022176986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021620905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31590492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512817360","doi":"10.1086/379907","title":"Book ReviewsOtfried.  Höffe, <i>Categorical Principles of Law: A Counterpoint to Modernity</i>. Translated by Mark Migotti, with a foreword by Kenneth Baynes.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002. Pp. 311. $26.50 (paper).","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterpoint; Reprint; Modernity; State (computer science); Permission; Download; Sociology; Art history; Media studies; Library science; Law; History; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02479086253973759,"score_gpt":0.2574473436432803,"score_spread":0.23265648110354273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512817360","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037548086,0.77002585,0.0012183343,0.037417177,0.011926779,0.000040983523,0.0016647545,0.00017532783,0.17715529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004269083,0.58252263,0.0016320733,0.016932156,0.00846453,0.00006241876,0.0020266068,0.00032132835,0.38376907],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942243,0.00006594033,0.000030412595,0.00008765851,0.00034982126,0.00004379589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885595,0.00047832177,0.00007955032,0.000039084283,0.00048009018,0.00006696605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050685863,0.0010524512,0.00094510295,0.003930194,0.0009226793,0.0024349936,0.0011307002,0.001759446,0.10825729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024864445,0.00057170703,0.000538978,0.0056134714,0.0009452133,0.0037428217,0.00091511494,0.0022043663,0.054464135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008152294,0.000011906875,0.000042877407,0.00047724257,0.000004329407,0.00003175851,0.00010778197,0.000045727633,0.00009870493,0.006869328,0.9370971,0.05520517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020838195,0.0000032032826,0.00017720177,0.00035097013,0.0000026830771,0.00008895678,0.00003866405,0.0000117987975,0.000040066414,0.0021632854,0.9971168,0.000004260001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009347493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021168232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10825729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020195434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001989579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36215675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512842440","doi":"10.1086/521285","title":"Book ReviewsJonathan Glover, . <i>Choosing Children: Genes, Disability, and Design</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Pp. 121. $17.95 (cloth).","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Download; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05620986063998375,"score_gpt":0.34276398171007644,"score_spread":0.2865541210700927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512842440","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041528844,0.7512753,0.0015738228,0.045615397,0.016106708,0.00007638939,0.0011997258,0.000274718,0.18346265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026128087,0.45546567,0.0017661916,0.01751713,0.006854169,0.0000893028,0.0011673108,0.00027940053,0.5142481],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995085,0.00008277314,0.0000317738,0.000058481783,0.00028247284,0.000035936173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849284,0.00071879954,0.00008858784,0.000043943794,0.0005224657,0.00013346967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005879584,0.0013817338,0.00091643154,0.0021263692,0.0009180177,0.00234496,0.0012680583,0.0015928964,0.087904796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027747196,0.00059731683,0.00052896445,0.0026066517,0.0007844035,0.002892491,0.0007592888,0.0024474557,0.049594823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057550574,0.000007145154,0.000030392792,0.00018311273,0.0000022567174,0.000029753426,0.00007178002,0.000026117996,0.00003650681,0.0017793747,0.95965594,0.03817189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024330157,0.0000051312154,0.00017734613,0.00034717785,0.0000027449287,0.00019954819,0.00005792653,0.000013695539,0.00003229679,0.0013193581,0.9978377,0.000004613993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009337175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030380715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087904796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016670377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020672479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29407084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513169322","doi":"10.1086/423720","title":"Book ReviewsSerena Olsaretti, , ed. <i>Desert and Justice</i>.New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. Pp. 288. $65.00.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Ninth; Economic Justice; Download; Reprint; Library science; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07888899985329968,"score_gpt":0.3151188666197435,"score_spread":0.2362298667664438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513169322","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020075959,0.91213703,0.0004097492,0.01076321,0.007585799,0.000021330847,0.00040807313,0.000067314315,0.068406664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019663465,0.83763343,0.0006619141,0.0043407343,0.005607733,0.000038192342,0.0007006933,0.000086717984,0.14896436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959654,0.00007233173,0.000028497243,0.000053912147,0.00021523169,0.000033508382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989661,0.0004514837,0.00008134503,0.00003058452,0.000380141,0.00009036049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044589947,0.0014605598,0.0014274789,0.0035178699,0.0010182079,0.00220492,0.0011379729,0.001444134,0.06210172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018278795,0.00051103137,0.0005559604,0.004469248,0.00076681253,0.0027807679,0.000784275,0.0018019396,0.030408675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008078223,0.000011581146,0.000040676354,0.00075523206,0.000006631936,0.00003623783,0.000104967796,0.000055532968,0.00005629216,0.002601907,0.9503042,0.04601863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027818708,0.0000061865294,0.00027251084,0.0007446324,0.0000060239427,0.00018765617,0.000084876105,0.000018344492,0.000026765687,0.0019553197,0.9966898,0.0000051052916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009370442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026478678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06210172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017288078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020772151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20775098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513773266","doi":"10.1086/599234","title":"Book ReviewsSharon R Krause, . <i>Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation</i>.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008. Pp. 262. $29.95 (cloth).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Democracy; Deliberation; Political science; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.06982247493154563,"score_gpt":0.3299020432084936,"score_spread":0.26007956827694795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513773266","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023058294,0.7751611,0.0010167084,0.06484566,0.031402882,0.00004912068,0.0015787154,0.00019833371,0.1255168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003231394,0.5544596,0.0011225204,0.01993122,0.023276815,0.00008758557,0.001705384,0.00025680574,0.39592868],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993259,0.00010560983,0.000044313692,0.00008661947,0.00038494475,0.000052660358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975237,0.0009204739,0.00014087876,0.00008187856,0.001108278,0.00022472937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076810044,0.0012482682,0.0011656443,0.0030039588,0.00093323016,0.002582132,0.0014662602,0.0018706662,0.090535656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00393946,0.0005565075,0.0006013411,0.0040331213,0.0008561535,0.0030318508,0.0007403959,0.0026943395,0.060890213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036359856,0.0000050535673,0.000017188004,0.00015822773,0.0000019323452,0.000009556096,0.000020959284,0.000019593892,0.000014680998,0.0011114174,0.9792894,0.019348303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033207343,0.000004173858,0.00023819198,0.0004062657,0.0000038731087,0.00007850297,0.00003237775,0.00001883324,0.000028254575,0.0014028255,0.997778,0.0000053848125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010702423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025577562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090535656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022132485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026327267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30287194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514096663","doi":"10.1086/233280","title":"Book ReviewMartin Hollis, .<i>Trust within Reason</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Pp. 170. $54.00 (cloth); $16.95 (paper).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Media studies; Download; Art history; Sociology; Library science; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.041110273985225994,"score_gpt":0.31716822371016007,"score_spread":0.2760579497249341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514096663","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000091301124,0.9343679,0.00042497434,0.016679876,0.0077345436,0.0000304294,0.0010492122,0.000080939935,0.039540857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001378026,0.8800434,0.0006515026,0.008150348,0.0061165425,0.00006597281,0.0013128315,0.00010338379,0.10217797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994367,0.00007099052,0.00004775642,0.00008324849,0.00031348577,0.00004783865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971208,0.0011566762,0.00023521771,0.0000689644,0.0011980264,0.00022028654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084495597,0.0012969379,0.0017108895,0.0061541265,0.0006958582,0.0025002134,0.0020352693,0.0019874952,0.09055969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040752767,0.0006701912,0.00063599175,0.010102301,0.0008686346,0.0033758972,0.00096260913,0.002718683,0.058881003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009371588,0.0000056625354,0.000030576222,0.00088422425,0.0000057290104,0.000024255069,0.000030325922,0.000038293794,0.000031586824,0.0013473176,0.9489501,0.048642546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035143444,0.0000050001954,0.00021348718,0.00092143734,0.000008136159,0.00016171036,0.000021477606,0.00001172331,0.000021282092,0.0006635975,0.9979633,0.0000052089545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017819222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034588847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09055969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031398258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004095913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30295235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515810133","doi":"10.1086/374017","title":"Book ReviewsJan Narveson, . <i>Respecting Persons in Theory and Practice: Essays on Moral and Political Philosophy</i>.Lanham, Md.: Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2002. Pp. xiv+313. $75.00 (cloth); $24.95 (paper).","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Political philosophy; Politics; Sociology; Media studies; Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.16780645576121073,"score_gpt":0.49721281546416995,"score_spread":0.32940635970295923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515810133","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036807053,0.79443717,0.0009618667,0.02738207,0.021835938,0.00006862447,0.0011979836,0.00019088275,0.15355739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028437048,0.6132681,0.0015642039,0.011237187,0.008197836,0.00010406105,0.0015442872,0.0001841065,0.36105654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995296,0.00006887751,0.000031226056,0.0000600056,0.000277584,0.00003265262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980124,0.0008141128,0.0001460223,0.00005904315,0.00084433454,0.00012411333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048490404,0.0011587075,0.0010044613,0.0030012967,0.00091821456,0.0023336047,0.0011014065,0.001497622,0.08008279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031718158,0.0004291702,0.00051275105,0.0052934345,0.00057805725,0.0027154866,0.0008104974,0.0019856715,0.046925567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052718538,0.000007688745,0.000027729806,0.00049572403,0.000002803152,0.000018459035,0.00006750007,0.00003562697,0.00004451639,0.001687048,0.94848293,0.04912468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021019764,0.0000045245743,0.00019340472,0.00067061104,0.0000038418907,0.000086155924,0.00004425721,0.000014417859,0.000026392026,0.00088834245,0.9980616,0.0000042633956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00859398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023271592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08008279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015084129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025311366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26790363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517918421","doi":"10.1086/524879","title":"Book ReviewsCatherine Audard, . <i>John Rawls</i>.Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press, 2007. Pp. 328. $75.00 (cloth); $22.95 (paper).","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Economic Justice; Download; Permission; Media studies; Philosophy; Art history; Art; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07224834276563313,"score_gpt":0.3502776998650652,"score_spread":0.27802935709943205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517918421","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030822915,0.71581113,0.0009037768,0.024793828,0.014955717,0.00008007717,0.0019037555,0.0003718134,0.24087164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019741913,0.30590174,0.0010437949,0.0076787453,0.004491831,0.00006446282,0.0015941006,0.0002919781,0.6769591],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994753,0.00006711336,0.000029964442,0.00006894034,0.00031475103,0.00004401368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979406,0.0005742643,0.00012117647,0.00008255436,0.0010977859,0.00018354862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006426613,0.0012755413,0.001027339,0.0029968938,0.0010862754,0.0024468247,0.0012813476,0.0013574427,0.17153579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028848862,0.0006076359,0.00049280486,0.0051135183,0.00070000126,0.0027054842,0.0007430129,0.0019074216,0.10922792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033880906,0.000003967616,0.000020043844,0.00018214372,0.0000015679502,0.000010664808,0.00003047735,0.000017188351,0.000035472112,0.0007076101,0.973055,0.025932383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012584081,0.0000030317183,0.0001757932,0.0002094216,0.0000021604628,0.00006392787,0.00002813536,0.000009091058,0.000022795533,0.00030493631,0.9991763,0.000003145725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03443815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08682096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17153579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002404742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003293277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5738444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517982792","doi":"10.1086/343021","title":"Book ReviewsMargaret Moore, . <i>The Ethics of Nationalism</i>.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Pp. 260. $45.00 (cloth).","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Nationalism; Download; Media studies; Section (typography); Sociology; History; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06908773803624252,"score_gpt":0.33420642310245724,"score_spread":0.2651186850662147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517982792","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023456685,0.8414712,0.00058588944,0.02382691,0.010449276,0.00003873918,0.0008945449,0.000105553976,0.122393295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002471409,0.66284657,0.00086460746,0.010296071,0.008266655,0.000070398986,0.001265831,0.00015909763,0.31375927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951375,0.00007502413,0.000034409568,0.000054917884,0.00028304715,0.00003880137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812883,0.00080550776,0.0001396593,0.00005905049,0.0007220976,0.00014481111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057463493,0.0012003644,0.0009853551,0.0032078868,0.0010108603,0.002387692,0.0013178776,0.0016793758,0.08974973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00296386,0.0005363362,0.00047017008,0.0045197043,0.0007576524,0.0029090468,0.00078124023,0.0023252955,0.04454044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006453119,0.000007725966,0.000027849905,0.00039596687,0.0000030485576,0.00002192037,0.000059314676,0.000029655937,0.000028583661,0.002635278,0.9601931,0.036591172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022624183,0.000004546614,0.00023881071,0.0006304438,0.000003078189,0.00011658789,0.000049748385,0.000011884357,0.000023621797,0.0014529359,0.99746144,0.000004716985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011651237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032329246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08974973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020412703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021877058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30024272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2656410037","doi":"10.1086/691572","title":"Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. <i>Luck Egalitarianism</i>. London: Bloomsbury, 2015. Pp. 280. $94.00 (cloth); $29.95 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Luck; Download; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09705229263328174,"score_gpt":0.3913213722091125,"score_spread":0.29426907957583076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2656410037","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004849502,0.91421187,0.001497925,0.025154272,0.0036044414,0.000019101575,0.000798056,0.00028769678,0.053941656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021047583,0.7728986,0.0032060582,0.0063156052,0.0026447373,0.00008276686,0.0008785987,0.00078746077,0.19213858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994215,0.0001172373,0.00006108023,0.00009195306,0.00022996434,0.00007827629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876,0.0006166895,0.00011694113,0.00006189139,0.00033516774,0.00010937818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010598076,0.0019497111,0.0010740357,0.002881166,0.0016194646,0.002813925,0.0013151154,0.00337492,0.08288912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030015793,0.0014242899,0.00056364795,0.004140489,0.0015196254,0.0083043035,0.0017592777,0.004098697,0.053342644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037998918,0.000017074679,0.00015481669,0.00051515875,0.000013082975,0.00009498856,0.00062718074,0.00012429636,0.00014488501,0.01610088,0.8567242,0.12544538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011519098,0.0000094428315,0.0008535278,0.0010785605,0.000016948585,0.00020748274,0.0004919685,0.0000667848,0.0002776079,0.0171135,0.9798512,0.000021526193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017878411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024304582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08288912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018593408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27729172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2720829538","doi":"10.1086/691575","title":"Price, Carolyn. <i>Emotion</i>. Cambridge: Polity, 2015. Pp. viii+199. $22.95 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Download; Permission; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07166658084283045,"score_gpt":0.4170584727122006,"score_spread":0.34539189186937014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2720829538","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004153341,0.8193431,0.0010066213,0.05293823,0.0099389665,0.000024914045,0.0014314951,0.0004328681,0.11446852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013830686,0.44964796,0.0011115499,0.009957949,0.007795855,0.00010815084,0.0010483694,0.0006559918,0.5158435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950385,0.000088335015,0.000064225205,0.000077156146,0.00020288484,0.00006356868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859744,0.0006007042,0.00011788444,0.00007477735,0.00043148184,0.0001777471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080077,0.0021890178,0.0011468672,0.002786686,0.0016805945,0.004511304,0.0014719161,0.0027702884,0.26289234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031272706,0.0017617055,0.0007091576,0.0038292317,0.0019654366,0.009100784,0.0021578325,0.0041542607,0.15168978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029937313,0.0000069802536,0.000091433954,0.00028331176,0.0000053585495,0.000029296405,0.00020345241,0.000045617966,0.000077574055,0.0030938466,0.93527585,0.060857378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086353575,0.00001334143,0.0012940062,0.0012127566,0.000012515066,0.00014331767,0.00043667277,0.000043210242,0.00010173178,0.0058933087,0.99082774,0.000012922217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014763377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037161235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26289234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016013455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013443186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8794625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779239962","doi":"10.1086/694282","title":"Mikkola, Mari. <i>The Wrong of Injustice: Dehumanization and Its Role in Feminist Philosophy</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Pp. 298. $99.00 (cloth); $35.00 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Dehumanization; Download; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social injustice; Permission; Media studies; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Anthropology; Computer science","score_opus":0.057505785234217545,"score_gpt":0.31937817744474506,"score_spread":0.2618723922105275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779239962","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015886418,0.7628133,0.0018969842,0.18173647,0.0076345946,0.00001967137,0.00029333425,0.00009557361,0.043921385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0684764,0.8262294,0.0033427472,0.024873002,0.0075783352,0.00012110444,0.00027615222,0.00038035624,0.06872242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992042,0.00028578562,0.00006220284,0.00008332356,0.0002758638,0.000088671586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949256,0.0034314732,0.00035930023,0.00012927213,0.0008175519,0.00033680658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020761231,0.00094357517,0.00085352536,0.002635929,0.0034218878,0.003687893,0.001866944,0.0035138752,0.019057253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059792018,0.0008933809,0.00038398392,0.0023201494,0.0058591412,0.016764648,0.002804508,0.0057075256,0.006521517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006146225,0.000025179546,0.00051142817,0.0009735264,0.000019921283,0.00019456736,0.0076026837,0.00008539001,0.00024987946,0.058900576,0.846651,0.08472443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020443364,0.000020891113,0.0041103247,0.002714719,0.000034272125,0.0005558612,0.00808668,0.00010645018,0.0004643052,0.06775958,0.9160859,0.00004055294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013692208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02774263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019057253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027076493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002806082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06375283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780847921","doi":"10.1086/694283","title":"Moschella, Melissa. <i>To Whom Do Children Belong? Parental Rights, Civic Education, and Children’s Autonomy</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Pp. 212. $110.00 (cloth); $32.99 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Download; Permission; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01841731600738509,"score_gpt":0.3124469544639122,"score_spread":0.2940296384565271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780847921","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007640566,0.66418654,0.0004610042,0.2664803,0.013418962,0.000024891748,0.00057712285,0.000144052,0.053943112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033425234,0.76043016,0.001310397,0.042550888,0.013397808,0.00012531682,0.000595804,0.00029143368,0.14787298],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995807,0.00013175953,0.00003147117,0.000049627244,0.00013495592,0.00007141602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964516,0.0017491461,0.0001915687,0.00009651198,0.0009108642,0.00060029386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012168642,0.0010067573,0.00059444195,0.0024104742,0.0028826457,0.00269137,0.0015017356,0.0034324848,0.037407666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054827835,0.00073495484,0.0003828105,0.0021684759,0.0019518816,0.0064030928,0.0016371515,0.0056871953,0.018448558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000121278,0.0000054537895,0.00016912383,0.000117358315,0.0000033541648,0.00004384089,0.00067719695,0.000010458526,0.000028348622,0.002429835,0.9680923,0.02841065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009062986,0.000008151731,0.0026450807,0.0010597565,0.000010442273,0.00017906413,0.0018415289,0.000024004621,0.0000747889,0.0057179364,0.9884177,0.000012472523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04031179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09237968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04031179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019296363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025591238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12514108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973221726","doi":"10.1086/704353","title":"Smith, Holly M. <i>Making Morality Work</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Pp. 432. $67.00 (cloth).","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Media studies; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13953830839069573,"score_gpt":0.44481162722672674,"score_spread":0.30527331883603104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973221726","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033398144,0.73021907,0.002003597,0.13429661,0.013521078,0.000031134707,0.00048133475,0.00025943824,0.118853755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01423743,0.63383305,0.003885177,0.02564647,0.008714688,0.00012488525,0.00079566106,0.00065007067,0.3121125],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981123,0.00050320337,0.00013705247,0.00015454301,0.0009158515,0.00017699748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995083,0.0024565598,0.00034853045,0.00020411349,0.001245832,0.00066205213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022761317,0.0013867255,0.0007303614,0.002571981,0.002573344,0.006512773,0.0015046168,0.0038583789,0.07302202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007082492,0.0011709599,0.0005444055,0.0026023597,0.004867586,0.012188958,0.0020569153,0.0075862827,0.05029341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068379973,0.0000055245496,0.000064666834,0.00025528227,0.0000033570846,0.000017910777,0.00058287533,0.000022538305,0.000038151218,0.0074817697,0.95360017,0.037920944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027090573,0.0000057970187,0.00037786082,0.0009950248,0.0000037359184,0.00006665793,0.0008526033,0.000014658425,0.00006513343,0.011038385,0.9865659,0.000011457176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015421266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028079467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07302202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004089629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055851266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24428302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210430162","doi":"10.1086/713947","title":"Index to Volume 131","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.13874349826592985,"score_gpt":0.41594711925122224,"score_spread":0.2772036209852924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210430162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011113201,0.0013553229,0.0002812494,0.0020056753,0.013659666,0.00024306634,0.0035425862,0.0010379889,0.9777633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00032781754,0.0009283532,0.00017595287,0.0013185875,0.0030686334,0.000075382144,0.0019097838,0.0004202262,0.99177516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897575,0.0000843891,0.00007830594,0.00017220418,0.00056467723,0.00012462579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672854,0.00055426656,0.00016746175,0.00034063036,0.0013465866,0.0008625541],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063326454,0.0018984437,0.00213571,0.004796494,0.0022429833,0.007940848,0.0021278206,0.0027100772,0.94774604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061655636,0.0007948493,0.0013864844,0.0046490445,0.0008935448,0.003920555,0.0040424657,0.0030617276,0.9299679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012057757,0.000023503146,0.000035582903,0.00015964788,0.0000021339724,0.00001880171,0.000009058963,0.000015779806,0.000118039374,0.00055349484,0.97429,0.024761861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009795167,0.0000109357525,0.00018788202,0.00015417862,0.000001943925,0.000022470444,0.00002198004,0.000018215802,0.000056341014,0.00050554983,0.99900335,0.00000727158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004262104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064227665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05225396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002213794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027817462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07453388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210574273","doi":"10.1086/713946","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Metaphysics; Moral philosophy; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Theology; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.15653136241803917,"score_gpt":0.32061704231834176,"score_spread":0.1640856799003026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210574273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004372259,0.002687291,0.0011279329,0.011114573,0.032920174,0.00026376007,0.006311597,0.0009547625,0.9441826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014443768,0.0009284369,0.00035956257,0.0017328693,0.0017893777,0.00009817873,0.001881525,0.0004984701,0.99126726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729294,0.000379513,0.00019095419,0.00048069487,0.0013679971,0.00028786127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99198663,0.001271037,0.00030553702,0.0012839762,0.004269497,0.00088333245],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016615071,0.0010723849,0.000906961,0.00342207,0.0036241845,0.0068583163,0.0021942777,0.0021876653,0.7976208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017057497,0.00044564917,0.0006734187,0.0036356032,0.00089490553,0.005622382,0.0046491288,0.003307247,0.69363505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011053638,0.0000077761015,0.000038007707,0.000051417508,9.906173e-7,0.000018840245,0.00007060542,0.000011260037,0.0000448557,0.0045664827,0.97105443,0.024124272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015238134,0.0000022368997,0.000047415655,0.000050114642,4.9440695e-7,0.000014405734,0.000050249215,0.0000056128274,0.000023320346,0.00045258037,0.99935,0.000001988142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037140923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052008843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7976208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026614761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030485825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28866935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240472568","doi":"10.1086/700086","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Media studies; History","score_opus":0.17789257331736216,"score_gpt":0.44002885691677046,"score_spread":0.2621362835994083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240472568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004863813,0.003620826,0.0012035487,0.019494837,0.053524252,0.00029883324,0.006114737,0.0008437612,0.9144128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020373536,0.0013482417,0.0004596697,0.0034178,0.0029656892,0.00014242632,0.0019117311,0.00052127725,0.98719573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691474,0.00045165597,0.00020736348,0.0005642419,0.0014903235,0.00037174305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897864,0.0015794723,0.0003614657,0.0016327495,0.0055921585,0.0010478881],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019341138,0.0010442142,0.0009332974,0.0035591456,0.0046025673,0.008081092,0.002456817,0.0026976706,0.7173758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022750743,0.00046408208,0.0007624072,0.0039552795,0.0010885473,0.0061152675,0.004756852,0.0039762375,0.600016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010385395,0.000007315238,0.000035900055,0.000050312028,9.865781e-7,0.000019627683,0.00007812727,0.0000107032465,0.00003968987,0.005776296,0.974574,0.019396614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014927023,0.0000020773116,0.000048668862,0.000056937664,5.4626014e-7,0.000014348014,0.000063979016,0.000006247987,0.000025136225,0.0006053156,0.999173,0.0000022542768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045905528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060469774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7173758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034193015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004104162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4031291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296779938","doi":"10.1086/720780","title":"Táíwò, Olúfẹmi O. <i>Reconsidering Reparations</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. 280. $33.99 (cloth).","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Economic history; Theology; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.0896249172726964,"score_gpt":0.30969661933287856,"score_spread":0.22007170206018217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296779938","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007743304,0.8335829,0.0009094389,0.10233446,0.013310397,0.000018380071,0.00018939597,0.00012560691,0.048755065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023895087,0.75116795,0.0017803796,0.01742146,0.0113141155,0.00007995972,0.0003931295,0.00026071697,0.19368725],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919254,0.00035791736,0.000074775264,0.000046672474,0.00022490749,0.000103229926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969586,0.001414615,0.0004102723,0.00012892522,0.00067145744,0.00041612017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020171297,0.00093652774,0.0005369986,0.00155012,0.0018167029,0.0027103028,0.00097214425,0.003987092,0.042378105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072734156,0.00078572205,0.00042895263,0.0016258894,0.002231975,0.006157519,0.0013384152,0.0049395575,0.020594893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000372907,0.000010950845,0.00019393887,0.00033434902,0.000008153521,0.000076589,0.00059699104,0.000057267294,0.0001470926,0.007233609,0.9175636,0.07374011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073738056,0.000015178365,0.0009898525,0.000996981,0.000011945878,0.00015600026,0.00085883937,0.00004298226,0.00014397482,0.0096167475,0.98714846,0.000011577161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0112506645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025499795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042378105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016429307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028332905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14176887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311743327","doi":"10.1086/722129","title":":<i>The Right to Higher Education: A Political Theory</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Higher education; Politics; Sociology; Plea; Argument (complex analysis); Middle class; Law; Political science; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07690918853229915,"score_gpt":0.4038831134318028,"score_spread":0.3269739248995036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311743327","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00089704426,0.082377605,0.0017079905,0.68396425,0.013848684,0.00001983905,0.00028129053,0.00005056074,0.21685272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1426196,0.124588326,0.0023144227,0.33655852,0.043279063,0.0001325393,0.00073652394,0.00036691866,0.34940413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983833,0.000551608,0.000046792557,0.00026447113,0.0004896586,0.00026425888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852836,0.00067900494,0.00016836116,0.000086534164,0.00030226324,0.0002355666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018853382,0.0005598107,0.00038802985,0.001184017,0.0033899283,0.01478131,0.0011184728,0.0064936783,0.050703324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043719383,0.00036200188,0.00042249903,0.0024564352,0.0090421755,0.016716668,0.0026588773,0.0074871513,0.014954761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064587452,0.000011567173,0.00014726206,0.00008759195,0.0000024965975,0.000015948044,0.00051542494,0.000029963701,0.000034527304,0.2642431,0.7224329,0.012472679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049384066,0.0000064863693,0.00044409544,0.0005503953,0.0000028951936,0.000056095065,0.0009894401,0.00006678572,0.000074382595,0.08854702,0.909247,0.000010507003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063732285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0086434465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050703324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004437463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036488166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1696195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386763843","doi":"10.1086/725812","title":":<i>The Roots of Normativity</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Permission; Reuse; Library science; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Biology","score_opus":0.12340072441999769,"score_gpt":0.3137599496110649,"score_spread":0.1903592251910672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386763843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010329127,0.02072445,0.026974259,0.4512942,0.0067701163,0.00004449946,0.00022075855,0.00014826548,0.48349437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7697628,0.00805678,0.013079913,0.11812253,0.010824638,0.00032939456,0.00016011331,0.00040845288,0.07925539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613875,0.0025752236,0.000101405305,0.00043391113,0.00051062374,0.00024005782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921799,0.005384997,0.00051489583,0.0005704718,0.0010537276,0.00029609603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005191478,0.00051627815,0.0005254514,0.0011894001,0.0043236925,0.010286855,0.0015993378,0.006512557,0.009671057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009177584,0.0003182892,0.0004469378,0.0018394969,0.049415033,0.017767396,0.0027236145,0.008199202,0.0021308663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040359078,0.0000031195973,0.00004581352,0.000022237604,0.0000018828682,0.000009878007,0.0013489184,0.000021918873,0.000020139014,0.98178893,0.015455254,0.0012779338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005993943,0.0000037559282,0.00022654702,0.00013667831,0.0000041927633,0.00006026307,0.0018367432,0.00014602668,0.00011890389,0.91252553,0.08492448,0.000010854612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064940047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00498625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010286855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035185881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040530423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032352924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389802239","doi":"10.1086/727275","title":":<i>Subjects of Intergenerational Justice: Indigenous Philosophy, the Environment and Relationships</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Download; Economic Justice; Permission; Sociology; Reuse; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.0529604956228928,"score_gpt":0.2743060659527221,"score_spread":0.22134557032982932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389802239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045226857,0.05214544,0.0051587196,0.4016946,0.005143447,0.00006884731,0.00015416351,0.00006237388,0.4903456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8331783,0.015876262,0.0023609032,0.06211793,0.004355895,0.00023686216,0.000090319605,0.000116928866,0.08166674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987539,0.0008057586,0.000039030972,0.0001223268,0.000114354894,0.00016463775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985701,0.0008765574,0.00013530094,0.000085099346,0.00021091696,0.000121983954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025054633,0.000385536,0.00030687702,0.00075546675,0.006057694,0.00866225,0.0010207945,0.004322096,0.0056957393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025909005,0.00012173316,0.00024931665,0.0020159387,0.025704993,0.006977451,0.0032475945,0.0047804103,0.0005088661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066823814,0.000014102285,0.00044314945,0.000110129244,0.000003361218,0.00010010537,0.060228534,0.000023641398,0.00009467054,0.9102382,0.02435021,0.004387157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015000234,0.000017665967,0.0034423128,0.00087230944,0.000021499613,0.00035089895,0.15966754,0.0001393852,0.00029725785,0.29208177,0.5430745,0.000019888064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033211853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040249657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033211853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036302716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054151225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06603706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392672923","doi":"10.1086/728629","title":":<i>Bias: A Philosophical Study</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.32545378093771543,"score_gpt":0.3729506229512032,"score_spread":0.04749684201348775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392672923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05665908,0.026101947,0.055268336,0.7112883,0.0035912097,0.00022230226,0.000285304,0.000099174635,0.14648436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9031739,0.0063128225,0.01470128,0.06342255,0.0032432838,0.0004170601,0.00012080625,0.0002110297,0.008397333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95388556,0.03358868,0.0015016365,0.0029405635,0.0068208934,0.0012626399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82529354,0.14922832,0.0076053306,0.0067498866,0.009801574,0.0013212649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048219535,0.00054764684,0.0010838474,0.0042973105,0.008043237,0.017196339,0.0032166385,0.010340799,0.0076847523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100738145,0.00042950583,0.00080992025,0.006629575,0.0671899,0.030022059,0.0072154286,0.008159381,0.0010130729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020429996,0.00001465828,0.0015215789,0.00025517933,0.00002198635,0.00007181955,0.017869512,0.000056321405,0.00008751761,0.9610391,0.011191229,0.0078505995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003177887,0.000024054245,0.0019119901,0.0016362558,0.00005204063,0.0005168765,0.0388073,0.0006586902,0.0005256524,0.88068897,0.07511093,0.000035564655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005669002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004524616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048219535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007919615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010440345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25501233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402349420","doi":"10.1086/731427","title":":<i>Getting Things Right: Fittingness, Reasons, and Value</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.019211313242684568,"score_gpt":0.2498919865775157,"score_spread":0.23068067333483114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402349420","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01604103,0.019700576,0.005522937,0.84689206,0.004954033,0.000032982454,0.00007592192,0.0000523812,0.106728114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5613412,0.009912707,0.0049866117,0.3746273,0.005097313,0.00016770029,0.000103867234,0.00022006282,0.04354323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99053127,0.006786358,0.00032823833,0.00057448604,0.0011922595,0.0005873512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98707795,0.008542145,0.0014063545,0.0005397705,0.0015784254,0.0008553684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077578533,0.00036842577,0.00032593636,0.0008570852,0.0050014257,0.012308899,0.001035213,0.008620395,0.005137217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015922403,0.00021428682,0.00034579987,0.0017080773,0.03845175,0.011091976,0.0030825415,0.012234301,0.0015113306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031831256,0.000030660787,0.0017591661,0.00018467048,0.000018254781,0.000172884,0.05530933,0.00008295492,0.0002881198,0.6458448,0.27390003,0.022377321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013608355,0.000027491074,0.004333256,0.001158413,0.000020968848,0.0008212514,0.07764234,0.00031111581,0.0006792692,0.44519827,0.46972147,0.000072605624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009058033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008800733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012308899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032202243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066508246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041027963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404952390","doi":"10.1086/732625","title":":<i>Morality and Socially Constructed Norms</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Sociology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.1249822985326092,"score_gpt":0.4246395499417757,"score_spread":0.29965725140916655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404952390","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01841601,0.016261337,0.021247327,0.48425874,0.004982306,0.000037248916,0.0002659892,0.00008393581,0.4544471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85977924,0.006596834,0.0061365124,0.06641755,0.006103213,0.00022921144,0.00019195548,0.00016885783,0.054376684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748564,0.0016277604,0.000063044856,0.0002935362,0.00036829978,0.00016173287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968264,0.002013436,0.00026144442,0.00022973676,0.0005021397,0.00016679407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032516567,0.00043745886,0.00043717228,0.0010911407,0.0034515976,0.009135642,0.0012983438,0.006766943,0.008558496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005102475,0.00021472531,0.00030628484,0.0019544351,0.03945665,0.010616864,0.0027209762,0.0068257195,0.0015287284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020263817,0.000003024101,0.000047495345,0.000017195376,0.0000015912505,0.000009496742,0.0010932038,0.000025141393,0.000020856885,0.9874829,0.010088748,0.001208265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046878654,0.000003911289,0.00030681505,0.00009349614,0.0000039180723,0.000061889594,0.0018739342,0.00016337287,0.000067501365,0.94480693,0.05260619,0.0000074039763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077874823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054361317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009135642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033864842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033511512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028630972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417513363","doi":"10.1086/738306","title":": <i>Consent Under Duress</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.12150159450014478,"score_gpt":0.47423745330891603,"score_spread":0.35273585880877123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417513363","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052777617,0.010559324,0.004049505,0.8491197,0.005561222,0.000036254227,0.00008100701,0.000029965026,0.12528528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3233178,0.0077272025,0.0053025363,0.6172464,0.008770492,0.00030112793,0.00009305105,0.00013583478,0.037105564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843262,0.010096266,0.0008914793,0.0013204967,0.0019556263,0.0014100485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97989196,0.014194384,0.001609441,0.0010185789,0.0021242516,0.0011613669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017026825,0.00033225215,0.00052333804,0.00049582793,0.0046627363,0.008203666,0.0017043777,0.019825334,0.005754449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035716962,0.0003590086,0.00061776355,0.00081934,0.035861332,0.010804079,0.004197691,0.021469215,0.0017550422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072427933,0.000005623677,0.00033656272,0.00006696678,0.000005274941,0.00029868862,0.00668797,0.00004693547,0.00008427029,0.90029323,0.086369656,0.0057976404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013014911,0.000018668368,0.0014168328,0.0011079388,0.000019620189,0.0026117563,0.009961289,0.00015152352,0.00040829228,0.55270857,0.43153536,0.000047218167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009702371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01099041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019825334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045707263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011223459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09004754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417513414","doi":"10.1086/738314","title":": <i>Kant’s Reason: The Unity of Reason and the Limits of Comprehension in Kant</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Comprehension; Limit (mathematics)","score_opus":0.09361536783431028,"score_gpt":0.31371269324973977,"score_spread":0.22009732541542948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417513414","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013982822,0.044726912,0.032663863,0.4624921,0.010073433,0.00006304563,0.0005464773,0.00031280663,0.43513852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69501525,0.012564291,0.014062338,0.16396157,0.014582869,0.00033458637,0.0003669585,0.00076046964,0.09835168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974668,0.0014818286,0.00008915195,0.00040758835,0.00036274124,0.00019176259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953709,0.003238559,0.00030053264,0.0003416473,0.0005872584,0.000161027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033786846,0.00077099964,0.00060210354,0.0015530658,0.0042079645,0.009087416,0.0018420436,0.00876732,0.008737479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007425472,0.0004545453,0.0007788371,0.0022658405,0.031717144,0.017900337,0.0033077868,0.011347518,0.002510366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012793633,0.000004738314,0.00006158221,0.00004286354,0.00000649481,0.000019714058,0.0034100546,0.00006064371,0.000051011008,0.9556059,0.038907044,0.0018171387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001028899,0.0000059612366,0.0003471824,0.00019412623,0.000010109815,0.00010029117,0.0025058298,0.00030354247,0.00030893093,0.87071866,0.12546818,0.000026891896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009116427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006384578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009116427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033906212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030857187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02922976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417513428","doi":"10.1086/738305","title":": <i>Wrongs and Rights Come Apart</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Bill of rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.043773567484217395,"score_gpt":0.40163271503043807,"score_spread":0.35785914754622067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417513428","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041691363,0.0090200715,0.01238357,0.7187349,0.007563448,0.00003670756,0.00013624447,0.000057637295,0.24789827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45317772,0.008246267,0.008870078,0.42072955,0.018446514,0.0003648707,0.00017438353,0.00021203245,0.08977848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98581576,0.007879068,0.0006368155,0.0017361329,0.002653341,0.0012788824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98376775,0.010408037,0.0011585486,0.0012990754,0.0024780147,0.00088856294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011860272,0.00072814093,0.0011870329,0.0019414066,0.008670578,0.015641337,0.002098055,0.022598216,0.01367118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022369327,0.00051292946,0.0009291632,0.0024297072,0.07780391,0.026637234,0.006745006,0.018569527,0.0035321452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035211028,0.0000055649675,0.00005624343,0.000033556444,0.0000036377594,0.00002272982,0.0015061488,0.000023349088,0.000024233153,0.9613135,0.0347054,0.0023020396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004142544,0.000002803702,0.000108184846,0.0001256854,0.0000044021604,0.000078212535,0.0016351636,0.0000553361,0.000049328406,0.9388622,0.059064757,0.00000979378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010041062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007695967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022598216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005866943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0097958995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062723815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083311401","doi":"10.1086/736732","title":":<i>Dancing with the Devil: Why Bad Feelings Make Life Good</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Plant and fungal interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Work (physics); Motivated reasoning; Affect (linguistics)","score_opus":0.0357948238466952,"score_gpt":0.2626977618327608,"score_spread":0.2269029379860656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083311401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015668297,0.009594174,0.0033697593,0.856757,0.012811693,0.000036256304,0.000088443216,0.00010379509,0.101570606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35731906,0.006158211,0.0037213839,0.550294,0.005030504,0.00012193001,0.00010849728,0.0003065335,0.076939814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647045,0.0022800504,0.00009288425,0.0002701407,0.0005192935,0.00036712128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645543,0.0012525275,0.00052293483,0.00018325011,0.0008234228,0.0007625336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033377684,0.00048015555,0.00034403848,0.00039607042,0.0052992045,0.0064596934,0.0009559729,0.006719233,0.0072193304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007763158,0.00017368683,0.00040694303,0.00041700242,0.01761036,0.004784954,0.003124682,0.014452592,0.002923589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061100494,0.0000584069,0.002848268,0.00024373928,0.000038695867,0.0007280476,0.0886207,0.00006945748,0.0014916658,0.17849134,0.693061,0.034287527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001616941,0.00004358203,0.0040116524,0.0007707747,0.000022248232,0.0025007396,0.106807105,0.00017623695,0.0009336217,0.061768882,0.8228729,0.00007609124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068448964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011988714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072193304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025189957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031896285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024151087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}