{"meta":{"query_hash":"454823d15907","filters":{"venue":"Ethics"},"cohort_total":43,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":43,"exported":43,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/454823d15907","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W2050353949","doi":"10.1086/662294","title":"Desert and Avoidability in Self-Defense","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Morality; Relevance (law); Self defense; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.2551081103067132,"score_gpt":0.2924957985916468,"score_spread":0.03738768828493361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050353949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8197154,0.00023355716,0.00003382353,0.0029951055,0.0005912886,0.00022201972,0.000010414533,0.0001662854,0.17603211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973805,0.00006905951,0.00037709708,0.0005725129,0.00013202461,0.000009094463,0.0000030648941,0.0000086419395,0.0014480094],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993197,0.00013309346,0.0001545801,0.00015775437,0.00011519809,0.00011972153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993461,0.0002855854,0.000036724407,0.00017405392,0.00011969644,0.000037836864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012695114,0.00006914197,0.00008549919,0.00004213911,0.00021401476,0.000045186167,0.00006966501,0.00014751378,0.00035041428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036748772,0.00006295317,0.000019038189,0.000018471868,0.00031419232,0.00012570375,0.000025210522,0.00070249074,0.000064117594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011069475,0.00006910139,0.0023097286,0.00008103489,0.0000041662324,0.0000015414148,0.54218894,1.4047717e-7,0.000011781844,0.4547971,0.00022058254,0.00030485482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082810473,0.0001887639,0.05998238,0.00011898536,0.00006405625,0.000005552103,0.060698178,0.0003425379,0.00082526624,0.5315246,0.34473604,0.0006855409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012534949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00944863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48149073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020101239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000640152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5272557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091245296","doi":"10.1086/664939","title":"Teichmann, Roger. <i>Nature, Reason, and the Good Life: Ethics for Human Beings</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Pp. 224. $65.00 (cloth).","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Hacker; Download; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Media studies; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.11275885111211387,"score_gpt":0.4540705135994523,"score_spread":0.3413116624873384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091245296","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01412199,0.04093636,0.011024358,0.5959217,0.0106001105,0.008425565,0.00048643746,0.0011468678,0.31733665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75799954,0.053394888,0.011160257,0.14286926,0.0067420634,0.00025713316,0.00028050464,0.00036517938,0.026931144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865379,0.009282919,0.0007982287,0.0006245143,0.0014224383,0.0013340311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9088683,0.08688469,0.00091956265,0.0012216436,0.0012944046,0.0008113633],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04604336,0.00043414248,0.0006211917,0.00006709674,0.0080947215,0.0000565669,0.0010264143,0.005826539,0.00020477203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069215074,0.00034189547,0.00018572426,0.00021745452,0.001970491,0.00076178735,0.00092525495,0.050029796,0.00004734596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003669073,0.00012127546,0.0067632245,0.0010220258,0.00013514311,0.000003218861,0.018277194,0.0000013878921,0.000014833969,0.8730733,0.10009202,0.00012950467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030003295,0.00008240641,0.0014238734,0.0003194381,0.00030763765,0.0000047115345,0.009001331,0.000066395995,0.00003088684,0.05842293,0.92695713,0.00038291485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013854834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006175463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82686514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020890683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015127725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314031533","doi":"10.1086/656500","title":"Beitz, Charles, and Goodin, Robert, eds. <i>Global Basic Rights</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. 272. $85.00.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Permission; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02018214438300254,"score_gpt":0.28212551708887307,"score_spread":0.26194337270587054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314031533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23220295,0.0005618965,0.00011115751,0.009126707,0.002525378,0.00040717615,0.0003640156,0.00022249388,0.7544782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90612686,0.0018231398,0.00075218733,0.0011397024,0.0015561536,0.000003279744,0.000058550613,0.000017985438,0.088522136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839693,0.000167138,0.00015470809,0.00031927266,0.0006012461,0.0003606741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899435,0.00021661002,0.00010518253,0.0002005345,0.0002735418,0.00020976136],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075100816,0.00015734218,0.00016047379,0.00002751011,0.0016017655,0.00014884763,0.0004797048,0.00062560075,0.00045440192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010416797,0.00014457692,0.00007689313,0.00007758432,0.00091493427,0.000421162,0.00010969309,0.0013076856,0.000022720338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017895276,0.00004002439,0.00065294874,0.000009441334,0.000021703843,0.000018561681,0.0017199502,9.71263e-7,0.000010208264,0.986538,0.010778027,0.0001922925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025556277,0.000023081651,0.0011640912,0.000013722367,0.000021187701,0.0000032814798,0.0000645945,0.000017794564,0.000055987486,0.12545055,0.8727488,0.00018135784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010188703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054999225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8619708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089452544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031092888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317017778","doi":"10.1086/657959","title":"Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. <i>Limits of Legality: The Ethics of Lawless Judging</i>.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Pp. 354. $65.00 (cloth).","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2193559932793061,"score_gpt":0.3851364791892516,"score_spread":0.16578048590994549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317017778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02370419,0.0006506029,0.0016997259,0.24359095,0.002890519,0.0007218336,0.00014486523,0.00014272559,0.7264546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97632915,0.0045352736,0.0012446898,0.0035840713,0.00023544727,0.0000041820103,0.000014926448,0.000021745842,0.014030493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678504,0.0014779856,0.0003778137,0.00022482671,0.00084735925,0.00028699075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946927,0.0028439676,0.0005299242,0.00047989827,0.0013519813,0.00010153509],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063793426,0.00013700518,0.00022529498,0.000058472342,0.0010183854,0.000067107525,0.00077566283,0.00062006805,0.00033278298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048069265,0.00012209902,0.00011259199,0.0007363994,0.0013362508,0.00074073253,0.000090847345,0.002744707,0.0000060801945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005214839,0.00016953258,0.0026055558,0.00007152982,0.000055723867,9.893466e-7,0.12738407,0.000008308231,0.000044046457,0.8551116,0.014119776,0.0003767335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023537593,0.00003202203,0.0019535497,0.000044627086,0.00006636294,8.3524543e-7,0.022714183,0.000011335214,0.0009296986,0.00506236,0.9688025,0.00014711221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046584703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010284074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95468277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006957575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003177406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320147873","doi":"10.1086/666531","title":"Kamm, F. M. <i>Ethics for Enemies: Terror, Torture, and War</i>Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Pp. 178. $35.00 (cloth).","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Download; Permission; Law; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Human rights; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1417600390908812,"score_gpt":0.29682872230103996,"score_spread":0.15506868321015876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320147873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062186863,0.07485425,0.019141585,0.18262573,0.03290195,0.0076060425,0.005714792,0.0031006401,0.61186814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7402783,0.04897848,0.004378171,0.01624294,0.010399057,0.00008254161,0.0008994863,0.0002924497,0.17844856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981545,0.00022221605,0.0003135042,0.00036416546,0.00041601752,0.0005295938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970796,0.0014902481,0.00021594827,0.00042875757,0.0005730017,0.00021243408],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020650087,0.00027975946,0.0002858655,0.00006397128,0.0014911863,0.00012851362,0.0003013008,0.00076698797,0.00027467855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006878485,0.00027339967,0.00012511596,0.000027176498,0.0008678053,0.000733273,0.000120528435,0.0019271998,0.000016950273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001021244,0.00013793886,0.000396685,0.0007855852,0.000079909805,0.0000013706141,0.25216722,0.0000057066163,0.000046041092,0.6586937,0.086892776,0.00069093716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004370385,0.00007477611,0.00016153572,0.00006707076,0.0001192135,0.0000026998678,0.01855794,0.00008113583,0.00021100116,0.0036494609,0.97627044,0.00036769648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008286496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015047267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88937765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078711826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002444704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324111193","doi":"10.1086/656509","title":"McMahon, Christopher. <i>Reasonable Disagreement: A Theory of Political Morality</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pp. 212. $90.00 (cloth).","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Politics; Download; Political philosophy; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Media studies; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.05282347929712096,"score_gpt":0.31789733002746806,"score_spread":0.2650738507303471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324111193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045431048,0.00069095026,0.00043497584,0.04505104,0.0013778376,0.00049948454,0.00094754243,0.00025043293,0.9053167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791601,0.00029671626,0.00025896408,0.0020927652,0.0008274362,0.0000032133219,0.000017421991,0.00002612598,0.017317273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956438,0.0012547063,0.00037714106,0.00046692777,0.001144266,0.0011131449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566597,0.0022943702,0.00015840115,0.00063548674,0.00049595244,0.0007498368],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004274442,0.0002560597,0.00037647918,0.00004364716,0.0009844502,0.00006736054,0.00082996645,0.0010063624,0.00019206926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044444543,0.00026971273,0.000215825,0.0003235432,0.004188078,0.00039394942,0.00024112656,0.0030113421,0.00006228791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007212407,0.00021837438,0.00069761975,0.00012787152,0.000034502962,0.000021741802,0.0021059334,0.0000014241019,0.00019999384,0.9839716,0.012492425,0.00005639633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072662113,0.00009874712,0.0056573935,0.00008143074,0.00014154216,0.000004497444,0.003976663,0.000034829744,0.0012892815,0.08685126,0.9005513,0.0005863881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045244347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009397732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93372905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013828972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015145616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324475652","doi":"10.1086/657967","title":"Korsgaard, Christine M. <i>Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity</i>.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. xiv+230. $35.00 (paper).","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Identity (music); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.10334888780950187,"score_gpt":0.2813579560327743,"score_spread":0.17800906822327245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324475652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26479706,0.005444283,0.0055566365,0.0059575024,0.0056040315,0.0014718494,0.00065432943,0.0016886096,0.7088257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96388656,0.025172995,0.0023489117,0.0018817398,0.0003264882,0.0000059509853,0.000012988307,0.000030903113,0.006333459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776644,0.0002998093,0.0003047821,0.00065502874,0.0005239524,0.0004499825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873585,0.0002489122,0.00015948582,0.0004976387,0.0001280286,0.00023010514],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006915317,0.0002819173,0.00026092734,0.00007407229,0.00075863424,0.000091471244,0.00071416853,0.00041408086,0.0004197242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009315727,0.00027364588,0.000107702836,0.0004039752,0.0008607044,0.0012674376,0.0005148236,0.0017197334,0.000054972028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000155806,0.0006975411,0.0067191385,0.00043553466,0.00004672115,0.0008829952,0.006299182,0.000007448598,0.01317188,0.9430432,0.026775334,0.001765249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006940813,0.00012201537,0.0037995079,0.00009777799,0.00006870144,0.00011324316,0.0001565349,0.00013995465,0.012544899,0.006970933,0.9747939,0.00049842126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079354044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026652074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9480186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053684296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026702054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324775572","doi":"10.1086/670936","title":"Nuccitelli, Susana, and Seay, Gary, eds. <i>Ethical Naturalism: Current Debates</i>.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Pp. 270. $90.00 (cloth).","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Naturalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07028475651126415,"score_gpt":0.4159039267057364,"score_spread":0.34561917019447225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324775572","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054410137,0.08618505,0.0042941775,0.61671746,0.02021856,0.0073158783,0.0005583405,0.0019264185,0.20837398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5343456,0.2391975,0.006450802,0.11941068,0.0055380366,0.00017699254,0.0005079996,0.00048350036,0.09388887],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98588675,0.009098903,0.00089987053,0.0010146821,0.0017243858,0.001375388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658727,0.029801859,0.0005690877,0.001086349,0.0015707865,0.0010992326],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010417414,0.0005331936,0.0006714576,0.000116943746,0.0030206824,0.000097274286,0.00093547336,0.003977581,0.0007812054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016464436,0.0005015526,0.00014785379,0.00041381433,0.0015842267,0.0009838647,0.0012165342,0.0535623,0.001402103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092209455,0.000119632634,0.0011755703,0.0010807639,0.00005915374,0.000047440575,0.0020787166,0.0000023319583,0.00009661999,0.19169594,0.8025457,0.0010058773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012281865,0.00008108022,0.0037197026,0.0006418172,0.00012856985,0.000018219014,0.0019196584,0.0007197274,0.000063681924,0.0017190134,0.9891556,0.00060475204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009740053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034709493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49730676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003617405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020314946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328636456","doi":"10.1086/669489","title":"Kisner, Matthew J. <i>Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life</i>.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Pp. 261. $85.00.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Download; Permission; Sociology; Personal autonomy; Human rights; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07001448226231942,"score_gpt":0.25889457218199013,"score_spread":0.1888800899196707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328636456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027604567,0.003381667,0.000019840534,0.15458414,0.0014793895,0.0011981359,0.00038258717,0.00034390175,0.8110058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86587393,0.0011362185,0.000046226563,0.011145535,0.0027237092,0.000026986598,0.00007110161,0.000059086546,0.118917204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778724,0.00048652923,0.00033491972,0.00044175956,0.00043239552,0.00051716325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978532,0.0008761126,0.00014359837,0.00056149065,0.00021113083,0.00035445922],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005623052,0.00033452347,0.00039001022,0.00003696906,0.0012029802,0.00032834435,0.00048996264,0.0002578063,0.0010524131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016421839,0.00023154065,0.0001903808,0.000034088258,0.0022903883,0.00029304868,0.00025943658,0.0014932777,0.00076599163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005273006,0.000120397846,0.000036750083,0.00006194351,0.00007562179,0.000005972532,0.0013828138,0.0000014480022,0.0000051188636,0.86093885,0.1372587,0.000059639617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015153519,0.00012397049,0.0009870621,0.00007471405,0.00009361751,0.000004276169,0.0004524158,0.00010844489,0.000033426597,0.011452574,0.98479784,0.00035633592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004972926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037701775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8494863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058714348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010542399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331411158","doi":"10.1086/662051","title":"Dworkin, Ronald. <i>Justice for Hedgehogs</i>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011. Pp. 506. $35.00 (cloth).","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Permission; Political science; Law; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.18944154517648118,"score_gpt":0.2715142025469825,"score_spread":0.08207265737050132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331411158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004099104,0.0036281738,0.011243768,0.010072858,0.0121418955,0.0020834347,0.0017008007,0.0010140163,0.954016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2864379,0.013258767,0.0058366647,0.012835758,0.010328486,0.00008599418,0.00081642775,0.00031803187,0.670082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983303,0.0001860133,0.00029685002,0.0004380947,0.00034520085,0.00040354172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780816,0.00066396035,0.00020785628,0.0004900846,0.0006912895,0.00013867761],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010918132,0.00024092228,0.00024723704,0.00005911585,0.0012177816,0.00013025792,0.0004531547,0.00040690025,0.00083744875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002528927,0.0002518859,0.0001561826,0.00003064181,0.0007013882,0.00039058417,0.000096410506,0.001048413,0.000519706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011989965,0.00010988396,0.000023488486,0.00037500754,0.000048756792,0.0000048359216,0.034338277,0.0000051395555,0.000026239544,0.61874557,0.34601253,0.00019038358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045943406,0.00008197988,0.0003041896,0.00006174511,0.00022769005,0.0000017739831,0.00647423,0.00013289675,0.00031507283,0.0020397806,0.9895616,0.00033961624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023595768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013390909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6435491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007653538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024878592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334278313","doi":"10.1086/673504","title":"Murphy, Timothy F. <i>Ethics, Sexual Orientation, and Choices about Children</i>.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012. Pp. 194. $27.00 (cloth).","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Sexual orientation; Permission; Orientation (vector space); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0419001357368044,"score_gpt":0.3569268610519801,"score_spread":0.3150267253151757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334278313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53464955,0.19702315,0.0008735178,0.20145932,0.0062653753,0.0055792267,0.0005592622,0.0010373733,0.052553184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.809323,0.04890696,0.0072491476,0.06853929,0.008977511,0.00023708299,0.0008492068,0.00032981593,0.05558799],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958643,0.00048656657,0.00077967794,0.0008575379,0.001308775,0.0007031427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949565,0.0019446623,0.00028560072,0.00081549067,0.0013518261,0.0006459478],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026164067,0.00042498278,0.00056972617,0.00010684909,0.00057549437,0.00022385053,0.00029013847,0.0016114487,0.00029823615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030522486,0.00038237136,0.00009155116,0.000306831,0.00067946524,0.000508422,0.00019316416,0.007017234,0.0003436395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017687025,0.0006827154,0.19936073,0.0049850587,0.00054029503,0.000084639614,0.035088424,0.000024627532,0.0003702384,0.037725918,0.71485764,0.0061028358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026419873,0.0007935818,0.16039966,0.00041294153,0.00035484222,0.00012651674,0.001050637,0.00023435439,0.00056758174,0.0016588148,0.83085024,0.00090881146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014669715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027906251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2746734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008148301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000954294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508103237","doi":"10.1086/233378","title":"Book ReviewsAlan Gewirth, .<i>Self‐Fulfillment</i>. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998. Pp. 217. $37.50 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Permission; Library science; Management; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Physics; Economics","score_opus":0.0591796670968227,"score_gpt":0.36063943770693324,"score_spread":0.30145977061011053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508103237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028242143,0.011038561,0.00009434403,0.17318839,0.0012031944,0.0010152403,0.000038449238,0.0005781424,0.81001943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02165707,0.32636094,0.0068191183,0.057685606,0.0020595042,0.000037492475,0.0001159758,0.00007675916,0.58518755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972784,0.00092685135,0.00032524878,0.00036533512,0.00069445453,0.00040969998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982358,0.0006377165,0.00022239721,0.0004557316,0.00023627964,0.00021204192],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024371187,0.00016791641,0.00020402686,0.00003742649,0.0014303427,0.00023265775,0.0005528202,0.00034586145,0.003787354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007960732,0.00017852883,0.00008948258,0.00058381265,0.00034374057,0.0013317078,0.000057418478,0.0016074565,0.0007218943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038637216,0.00039647054,0.00078141986,0.0001002069,0.00006530325,0.000009975916,0.047977876,0.000018544873,0.000030349016,0.3250245,0.6180079,0.0075488007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019423573,0.000022085951,0.0004628696,0.000050485283,0.000041260973,0.000001748612,0.00094661146,0.000009023273,0.00004609443,0.00030290696,0.9977018,0.00022086165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050888695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089040416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3796939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030850247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002048928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508937116","doi":"10.1086/233289","title":"Book ReviewElliott Sober, , and David Sloan Wilson, .<i>Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior</i>. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998. Pp. 394. $29.95 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Download; Art history; Sociology; Media studies; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.06946279802970198,"score_gpt":0.2949337000046876,"score_spread":0.22547090197498562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508937116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78909737,0.08675748,0.001227857,0.07236605,0.0023820985,0.002970893,0.0005342567,0.00037459756,0.04428942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2468621,0.59775746,0.0012741702,0.10192873,0.00044220564,0.000054943077,0.00003370308,0.000106070875,0.051540602],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980602,0.0005495508,0.00025483713,0.00052743277,0.0003362982,0.00027163766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990362,0.0002856899,0.00014131615,0.00038820345,0.00004229404,0.000106282205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071049074,0.00018426638,0.00023391485,0.000031551477,0.00033356115,0.000028345403,0.00035143507,0.00027226348,0.0001471021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008375846,0.00015254789,0.000064381275,0.00015642977,0.0010919081,0.00024226993,0.000060258604,0.00070676336,0.000051265175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006273437,0.0007199154,0.0057752714,0.0002507669,0.000049774993,0.00010776547,0.0017780759,0.000032586613,0.02969046,0.022648564,0.9282297,0.010089814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061702065,0.00017613894,0.022461496,0.00007452729,0.00007215741,0.000088405024,0.000046324298,0.000044051038,0.0005043733,0.000473144,0.975267,0.00017536123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034873834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029928417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54223526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042066793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047613376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6220722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510645367","doi":"10.1086/339591","title":"Book ReviewsJerome Neu, . <i>A Tear Is an Intellectual Thing: The Meanings of Emotion</i>.New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Pp. 342. $49.95 (cloth).","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Queen (butterfly); Download; Media studies; Permission; Sociology; Art history; Art; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1811916182180168,"score_gpt":0.32632235914875957,"score_spread":0.14513074093074277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510645367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23281346,0.3189259,0.0048544253,0.0855334,0.006261905,0.0050090654,0.00046968844,0.0013941744,0.34473798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16273293,0.07902125,0.0031692951,0.032821987,0.0010047405,0.000014696684,0.00007678335,0.00022084765,0.72093743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980123,0.00056332484,0.00035547785,0.00040169578,0.00032966412,0.00033750373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998271,0.00036118669,0.00021692304,0.00082714646,0.00017185803,0.0001518926],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008252709,0.00021707773,0.00030056515,0.000046812092,0.00035694664,0.000036910842,0.00062030536,0.0004263938,0.009495991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022997845,0.0001779168,0.00017175765,0.00030890224,0.00030546714,0.00022231782,0.00011686707,0.0014576874,0.0002602561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002362503,0.00021109372,0.00018323798,0.000028521494,0.00003984809,0.000009134485,0.0730305,0.0000038012417,0.00011543916,0.008921437,0.9135578,0.0038755368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035631587,0.00023641529,0.00053646846,0.00008917338,0.00012312629,0.000022332217,0.0021601056,0.00005077373,0.00011797112,0.00009623792,0.9960184,0.00019266886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010680823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004496842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37619948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059208145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008318097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510913775","doi":"10.1086/233327","title":"Book ReviewJules L. Coleman, , and Christopher Morris, , eds.<i>Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. pp. 253. $54.95 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Economic Justice; Sociology; Media studies; Art history; Law and economics; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.054390975925838685,"score_gpt":0.3253019295358414,"score_spread":0.2709109536100027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510913775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009294504,0.25260165,0.0010236884,0.27802235,0.0018991876,0.004869029,0.0033089486,0.0006055516,0.4483751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2534295,0.44977593,0.0028900423,0.115705736,0.011020716,0.00016809067,0.0005604869,0.00019736345,0.16625212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757606,0.00063772843,0.00028403106,0.00041088645,0.00059199345,0.0004993093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791473,0.001355364,0.00011276329,0.00017311778,0.00018140301,0.00026264234],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015916132,0.00022422467,0.00033213836,0.000021157259,0.0026579713,0.000113995724,0.00024597347,0.00059437245,0.00005499117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038138643,0.00024392318,0.00010233186,0.000100587415,0.0018696776,0.000359212,0.00008618672,0.00096922554,0.000016842077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005705206,0.000060689683,0.000023337063,0.00036040886,0.000027157903,0.0000064299,0.0021862444,0.0000027986325,0.0000049531295,0.66138,0.33535182,0.00053909677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006037556,0.00005870009,0.00046010525,0.00006687025,0.00021727805,0.0000026267965,0.0005914215,0.00011873421,0.000010101963,0.004482433,0.9930935,0.0002945008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020653752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028839477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65774167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121393896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000531538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512672195","doi":"10.1086/233437","title":"Book ReviewsPatricia Smith, .<i>Liberalism and Affirmative Obligation</i>. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Pp. 271. $49.95 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Obligation; Liberalism; Download; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.06357273097434996,"score_gpt":0.3112157524176009,"score_spread":0.24764302144325095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512672195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012059704,0.15434526,0.0010397328,0.20610757,0.00038076052,0.0025447633,0.00020711719,0.00066135504,0.6226537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036705527,0.5847309,0.005465966,0.02057376,0.0014370905,0.00002113957,0.000054807504,0.00005351627,0.35095727],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868125,0.00029134768,0.00018454953,0.00025135517,0.00034087364,0.00025060333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990817,0.00031495982,0.00011197798,0.00021882771,0.00006407942,0.00020849916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006599783,0.000119437216,0.00016317416,0.00001658217,0.0010597567,0.00011571876,0.00029533732,0.00023407265,0.00027928577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009860002,0.000120853576,0.00006397425,0.00032200824,0.00031737238,0.00039941387,0.00005857564,0.0005652789,0.00007757322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013978509,0.000047308316,0.00018776281,0.00005110602,0.0000238234,0.0000032483342,0.04452339,0.000048901362,0.0000061151995,0.27967247,0.6582324,0.017189538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017675609,0.000011808122,0.0003515477,0.00004584923,0.000031581483,6.2693823e-7,0.00067405245,0.000047820908,0.000014520781,0.0023699421,0.99612325,0.00015226133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009137531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008176776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43038565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008606801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046277212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512817360","doi":"10.1086/379907","title":"Book ReviewsOtfried.  Höffe, <i>Categorical Principles of Law: A Counterpoint to Modernity</i>. Translated by Mark Migotti, with a foreword by Kenneth Baynes.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002. Pp. 311. $26.50 (paper).","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterpoint; Reprint; Modernity; State (computer science); Permission; Download; Sociology; Art history; Media studies; Library science; Law; History; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02479086253973759,"score_gpt":0.2574473436432803,"score_spread":0.23265648110354273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512817360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049804877,0.2891325,0.08111153,0.17241931,0.0013558617,0.014720149,0.006825357,0.0030044934,0.38162592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18188074,0.48237634,0.02133463,0.04053424,0.00042262723,0.00003389509,0.00045553493,0.00036189376,0.27260008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969952,0.0006392405,0.00030543137,0.000551687,0.0009044799,0.0006039299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982494,0.00025931443,0.00023687413,0.00036619537,0.000490723,0.00039745672],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012675592,0.00031160066,0.00048944453,0.00000999441,0.0010747301,0.000061414685,0.00071228936,0.00058832177,0.00020058324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097481236,0.0002880049,0.00018280825,0.00044841797,0.0010779497,0.0006247157,0.0001033518,0.001198319,0.00002203834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011185353,0.00066685904,0.000088247354,0.0004531763,0.00030489298,0.00007804257,0.14422753,0.00067440694,0.00078716356,0.12714171,0.7242128,0.00024660715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009556764,0.00015303711,0.000022906454,0.00016979282,0.000116158386,0.000002252614,0.002338477,0.000019621053,0.00020486215,0.0006616205,0.994967,0.00038858643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00966943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01031567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2707542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003885509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006790089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512842440","doi":"10.1086/521285","title":"Book ReviewsJonathan Glover, . <i>Choosing Children: Genes, Disability, and Design</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Pp. 121. $17.95 (cloth).","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Download; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05620986063998375,"score_gpt":0.34276398171007644,"score_spread":0.2865541210700927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512842440","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012578825,0.9208892,0.0110516185,0.034220785,0.0009926944,0.0032025801,0.00018751786,0.0003891593,0.016487613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037423417,0.91122496,0.015660891,0.024750898,0.0022816232,0.0000058303176,0.00017066301,0.00012555686,0.008356147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968608,0.00045119377,0.0005802321,0.0006617091,0.000781923,0.00066413166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679136,0.0013604215,0.00021120175,0.000721538,0.00034241294,0.0005730546],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005064759,0.0003470223,0.0005761534,0.000042712192,0.0004693907,0.000047793234,0.00026142478,0.0009899557,0.000096534866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010320641,0.0003334793,0.00015345943,0.00031751706,0.0006178987,0.00024940545,0.00019652484,0.0032012446,0.0000053711406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015208275,0.0012303496,0.34654507,0.0074735624,0.00042188502,0.0006677222,0.008017382,0.00006108414,0.0002887043,0.02776658,0.5266552,0.079351634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009008389,0.00023020223,0.0105845565,0.0003217614,0.00020091698,0.000081408514,0.00013945605,0.000053205895,0.00020559679,0.000266457,0.98667747,0.00033813049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014206343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017177967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46002227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028992587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049154926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513169322","doi":"10.1086/423720","title":"Book ReviewsSerena Olsaretti, , ed. <i>Desert and Justice</i>.New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. Pp. 288. $65.00.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Ninth; Economic Justice; Download; Reprint; Library science; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07888899985329968,"score_gpt":0.3151188666197435,"score_spread":0.2362298667664438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513169322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001120517,0.42998224,0.0012617852,0.1070132,0.0018695219,0.0016121019,0.000052710086,0.00048589864,0.456602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010275296,0.6083132,0.0033603257,0.017843109,0.0017931281,0.0000045259453,0.000026747071,0.000045772642,0.3583379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984044,0.00024379889,0.00018116621,0.0003208392,0.00044598343,0.0004038483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998976,0.00012063199,0.00009663124,0.00025189805,0.00023867967,0.00031614242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001010289,0.00016266272,0.00023809493,0.000021215423,0.0010205059,0.0001304236,0.00039549,0.0003249111,0.00025772233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006993246,0.0001273559,0.00005284301,0.00034060894,0.00042381336,0.0004660884,0.00009738691,0.0008752922,0.000032768792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004324857,0.00006290048,0.000049137776,0.00016855853,0.000029141038,0.000038133487,0.008534242,0.000015056769,0.000028336231,0.5327661,0.45367065,0.0045944555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004030896,0.000044372482,0.00005018435,0.00015412139,0.00007489687,0.0000021651686,0.00046789483,0.0000068009203,0.000086817294,0.0011914385,0.9973033,0.00021493017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009455315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001823481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5436326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013343792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012007584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513773266","doi":"10.1086/599234","title":"Book ReviewsSharon R Krause, . <i>Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation</i>.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008. Pp. 262. $29.95 (cloth).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Democracy; Deliberation; Political science; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.06982247493154563,"score_gpt":0.3299020432084936,"score_spread":0.26007956827694795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513773266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033760285,0.096090555,0.001919675,0.4268366,0.0011920169,0.0026882433,0.00012384132,0.00079752784,0.4669755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37748325,0.43168023,0.0051101516,0.12330215,0.0028368882,0.000028724624,0.000105742336,0.00008673487,0.05936613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679404,0.0010300854,0.0003667949,0.00044665294,0.00078976236,0.0005726405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981547,0.0006351875,0.0001551506,0.00035886024,0.00025393564,0.00044218378],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001965731,0.00022964578,0.00031736257,0.00003249666,0.001592218,0.00014025075,0.00035726055,0.00057082914,0.00013539329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011274443,0.00022821229,0.00009850721,0.00023112098,0.00074544817,0.0006615391,0.00012323038,0.0014616911,0.000046261837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022331056,0.00013907242,0.00013166657,0.00009719348,0.000021817797,0.000021932321,0.0045794593,0.00002899335,0.00005572996,0.8523255,0.14181264,0.0007636553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030510177,0.00007646766,0.00072756014,0.00024135516,0.00006986401,0.0000018903578,0.00019898251,0.00015972566,0.00012336361,0.07263225,0.92515725,0.00030618938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044354497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044862166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7833446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017883297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006198305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514096663","doi":"10.1086/233280","title":"Book ReviewMartin Hollis, .<i>Trust within Reason</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Pp. 170. $54.00 (cloth); $16.95 (paper).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Media studies; Download; Art history; Sociology; Library science; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.041110273985225994,"score_gpt":0.31716822371016007,"score_spread":0.2760579497249341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514096663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023948485,0.07793902,0.00004695637,0.1010302,0.0015398855,0.0015322695,0.00034489276,0.00080844975,0.79280984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07658037,0.47818646,0.0006189449,0.049989678,0.0023511818,0.000013535239,0.00010002327,0.00014783042,0.39201197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944888,0.0017929327,0.00054289715,0.0006811092,0.0015204586,0.0009738379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677813,0.0010649115,0.0003310304,0.00070450094,0.00045817584,0.0006632656],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061094896,0.00039094358,0.00057463866,0.000041281648,0.0027802642,0.00045347193,0.0010211457,0.0012559646,0.0006263378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003159052,0.00042045314,0.00030193367,0.0005927209,0.0015740263,0.0014713866,0.00014798161,0.0031908303,0.00036645142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000762285,0.00011579527,0.0002663157,0.00010474903,0.00005692027,0.00006562213,0.015250709,0.000018289336,0.00004111617,0.15687981,0.8258172,0.0013072374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043028363,0.00007464563,0.0005609091,0.00023331585,0.00008264382,0.0000032498406,0.0018079508,0.000027745456,0.00005972318,0.0003572912,0.9958301,0.00053209945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07168944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054909093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40079787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054036354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021479274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515810133","doi":"10.1086/374017","title":"Book ReviewsJan Narveson, . <i>Respecting Persons in Theory and Practice: Essays on Moral and Political Philosophy</i>.Lanham, Md.: Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2002. Pp. xiv+313. $75.00 (cloth); $24.95 (paper).","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Political philosophy; Politics; Sociology; Media studies; Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.16780645576121073,"score_gpt":0.49721281546416995,"score_spread":0.32940635970295923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515810133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020914425,0.120868966,0.00042710244,0.2900822,0.0018531899,0.0017963198,0.000042830936,0.00024836027,0.58258957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18186861,0.12020459,0.014381166,0.66252834,0.0031751315,0.00037997757,0.000040263705,0.00041005592,0.017011864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96470493,0.03031425,0.0012719808,0.001046579,0.0012242636,0.0014379955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.886214,0.111006774,0.00055334077,0.000953921,0.00049411197,0.0007778554],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040796056,0.0005220041,0.0007800739,0.0001431411,0.0021356307,0.000092685215,0.00034807881,0.0020528182,0.001998222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32629764,0.00047787407,0.00009383881,0.00046673595,0.0011064267,0.000835694,0.0002889332,0.026373653,0.00054650044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000290655,0.0002196331,0.00093639025,0.0009860978,0.00003914079,0.00007946531,0.014069168,9.0548826e-7,0.000072081304,0.8684049,0.114758596,0.0001429233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012508363,0.00018228973,0.00019145275,0.0019460222,0.00010433922,0.00011572781,0.013179967,0.000009998141,0.000012367692,0.21723042,0.7652918,0.00048474717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041641534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043484513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6511745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002816668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011717351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517918421","doi":"10.1086/524879","title":"Book ReviewsCatherine Audard, . <i>John Rawls</i>.Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press, 2007. Pp. 328. $75.00 (cloth); $22.95 (paper).","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Economic Justice; Download; Permission; Media studies; Philosophy; Art history; Art; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07224834276563313,"score_gpt":0.3502776998650652,"score_spread":0.27802935709943205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517918421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024046485,0.009663406,0.00010297078,0.21615763,0.0015893317,0.00065296475,0.00010066639,0.00037988878,0.7711127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013334225,0.45889732,0.002431601,0.06848568,0.0017343077,0.0000286503,0.0000845378,0.00007647517,0.4549272],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997363,0.0009097516,0.0003312188,0.0003493423,0.0006571212,0.00038957607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746555,0.0009402818,0.00028524353,0.00045022077,0.0006355912,0.00022310345],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018104553,0.00018310695,0.0002449769,0.000044695273,0.0021955378,0.00007666258,0.00047525342,0.00037498822,0.0040191268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028153202,0.00019355919,0.00012306886,0.00060693297,0.0005303583,0.0013457817,0.000077923214,0.0015746584,0.0004062784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001875389,0.00012683333,0.00011909161,0.00002534252,0.000025038018,0.000014252385,0.009266175,0.0000051390966,0.000016808173,0.07013068,0.9196236,0.00062825606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024339897,0.000023774071,0.0006973814,0.00003494358,0.000032526434,0.0000049705864,0.0016303034,0.000003473885,0.000027575843,0.00025132942,0.9968176,0.00023274946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06155195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001189296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44923392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031209138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016300047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517982792","doi":"10.1086/343021","title":"Book ReviewsMargaret Moore, . <i>The Ethics of Nationalism</i>.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Pp. 260. $45.00 (cloth).","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Nationalism; Download; Media studies; Section (typography); Sociology; History; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06908773803624252,"score_gpt":0.33420642310245724,"score_spread":0.2651186850662147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517982792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003177203,0.026744314,0.0017790925,0.035365704,0.000853861,0.0007179761,0.000064263666,0.00009363909,0.93406343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12192102,0.7400664,0.0027313344,0.026176514,0.0007348532,0.000024446103,0.00013536312,0.00007481738,0.108135246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960509,0.0018825529,0.0003154382,0.0002529948,0.001171146,0.00032697988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667126,0.0017501488,0.00028840726,0.00033113925,0.00083414506,0.00012490526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063699884,0.00014680676,0.0002150376,0.000043362365,0.0010976923,0.000053600128,0.00053077796,0.0006290292,0.0002801255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006265516,0.00012767798,0.00014300851,0.0003833359,0.0009503782,0.0002978271,0.000054603974,0.0012502744,0.000008661908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072518856,0.00003363719,0.00021017074,0.00006530063,0.000012107373,0.0000015676827,0.008899613,0.000031844982,0.0000061614146,0.72492754,0.26570258,0.00010221319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022465935,0.000024103529,0.00012926715,0.00006539741,0.00004472632,9.1147206e-7,0.0028217232,0.000025435253,0.00010981715,0.026901122,0.9695023,0.00015055337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057139057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027871274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8259282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017572583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013288175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86377543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2656410037","doi":"10.1086/691572","title":"Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. <i>Luck Egalitarianism</i>. London: Bloomsbury, 2015. Pp. 280. $94.00 (cloth); $29.95 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Luck; Download; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09705229263328174,"score_gpt":0.3913213722091125,"score_spread":0.29426907957583076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2656410037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040366347,0.008233329,0.00011106448,0.46025297,0.0042914124,0.0005146391,0.00009521634,0.00045005739,0.5220147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398968,0.011459324,0.0007801392,0.028960092,0.0067544053,0.00003563574,0.000021171933,0.00010686699,0.011985564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943286,0.0009867485,0.0006208343,0.0008022576,0.0017951232,0.0014663965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449617,0.0020294532,0.0003085579,0.0017307397,0.00054331595,0.0008917545],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005568641,0.00044499015,0.0005593402,0.000049112637,0.006409667,0.0009739524,0.0021923694,0.0020247102,0.0010644617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01183408,0.00043513195,0.00035055832,0.00018389306,0.0045132916,0.0012001556,0.00045278587,0.004192849,0.001609186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034323868,0.00013675759,0.00038010222,0.00006477643,0.00005778676,0.00006482776,0.010541364,0.000004162151,0.00031500825,0.92344725,0.06436902,0.00058462686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044087527,0.00007533269,0.0007618335,0.00009158142,0.000050992934,0.0000043469636,0.000756154,0.000021717999,0.00025957363,0.2960169,0.70103836,0.00048231287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022302577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006941754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93586016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017766797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018455466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2720829538","doi":"10.1086/691575","title":"Price, Carolyn. <i>Emotion</i>. Cambridge: Polity, 2015. Pp. viii+199. $22.95 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Download; Permission; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07166658084283045,"score_gpt":0.4170584727122006,"score_spread":0.34539189186937014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2720829538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04776756,0.0013445986,0.000184456,0.22057943,0.0072914707,0.00063761906,0.00018277245,0.00037064534,0.7216414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522626,0.0021899738,0.0010647653,0.0048726816,0.0020201372,0.000024790406,0.000027235614,0.000038855214,0.037498984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635774,0.0007850383,0.00034025105,0.0004310234,0.001412592,0.0006733663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663407,0.0009272116,0.00033772748,0.0010202075,0.00071311084,0.00036765586],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041620024,0.00020142559,0.00024082519,0.000042729705,0.006683097,0.00036362943,0.0013623801,0.0007386959,0.0005476852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075910543,0.00019916621,0.0001336658,0.00019065793,0.0013217137,0.0008228879,0.000430454,0.0018202015,0.0007820981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068388163,0.00009230486,0.011728032,0.000027565047,0.00002430112,0.000010951902,0.0067151305,0.000004046598,0.00024470102,0.8155488,0.1651849,0.0004124531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003357637,0.000029290499,0.12436595,0.00011678731,0.000033780405,0.0000030392318,0.002015532,0.00001717098,0.00012858983,0.038785387,0.8338003,0.00036838694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014062272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063247234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.904495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023640893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017314713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779239962","doi":"10.1086/694282","title":"Mikkola, Mari. <i>The Wrong of Injustice: Dehumanization and Its Role in Feminist Philosophy</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Pp. 298. $99.00 (cloth); $35.00 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Dehumanization; Download; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social injustice; Permission; Media studies; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Anthropology; Computer science","score_opus":0.057505785234217545,"score_gpt":0.31937817744474506,"score_spread":0.2618723922105275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779239962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08693376,0.012763021,0.00007664995,0.027574696,0.0012770882,0.0008936575,0.00011567721,0.00009572742,0.8702697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852282,0.00993281,0.00008015503,0.00035854697,0.00018833436,0.0000033613244,0.0000054490206,0.000011122644,0.004192016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984408,0.00042114005,0.00023141572,0.0002936161,0.00031538174,0.00029765564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845195,0.0006679145,0.00030030077,0.00034771417,0.00016260038,0.00006954995],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015537007,0.00015013546,0.00024197536,0.000033722226,0.0030353859,0.00007261702,0.00063402194,0.00043104347,0.00003481698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011596547,0.00014039615,0.000046453104,0.000104239225,0.001430638,0.00030852627,0.00034729345,0.0006715288,0.0000033312724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018898999,0.0001575941,0.09578347,0.00032868085,0.00010611576,0.000026793954,0.12029344,0.000024752868,0.000054133903,0.7740847,0.008171337,0.0007799864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008359592,0.00011803027,0.077460684,0.00017751638,0.00010656799,0.0000029295952,0.029485099,0.0001083785,0.00012016684,0.015150638,0.87606066,0.00037337738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00267956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005926641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89829445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064543994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031679036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780847921","doi":"10.1086/694283","title":"Moschella, Melissa. <i>To Whom Do Children Belong? Parental Rights, Civic Education, and Children’s Autonomy</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Pp. 212. $110.00 (cloth); $32.99 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Download; Permission; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01841731600738509,"score_gpt":0.3124469544639122,"score_spread":0.2940296384565271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780847921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85757124,0.032315996,0.000097309414,0.05815232,0.0026074485,0.0028680523,0.0011018434,0.0003698479,0.044915907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96330225,0.007942139,0.0011965272,0.0036181535,0.0024223125,0.000017229784,0.00040873996,0.00008220967,0.021010432],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639964,0.00033615908,0.0005737889,0.0010781104,0.00086212746,0.00075016596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995559,0.0003740574,0.00040123094,0.0017833783,0.0007679625,0.0011144159],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014610332,0.0005220157,0.00068842014,0.00014357845,0.002667886,0.0004265375,0.00079352054,0.0010487251,0.00006617151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001083334,0.00050885155,0.0001604815,0.00017643608,0.00076046295,0.000531406,0.0005545458,0.0035820787,0.00010531308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024755002,0.000886544,0.47407955,0.000565523,0.00037461374,0.00008762026,0.008938642,0.000005665545,0.00007019558,0.046584267,0.4643223,0.0038375359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013233391,0.00020545901,0.46688482,0.00034619204,0.0002319476,0.00012044216,0.0002816992,0.000016264526,0.00015128698,0.00006626177,0.5298483,0.00052401464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06347404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008736365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10573098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004408967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004978463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973221726","doi":"10.1086/704353","title":"Smith, Holly M. <i>Making Morality Work</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Pp. 432. $67.00 (cloth).","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Media studies; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13953830839069573,"score_gpt":0.44481162722672674,"score_spread":0.30527331883603104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973221726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058266614,0.0026836144,0.0045999275,0.10765396,0.0113504585,0.0028142796,0.00013617231,0.0010783761,0.81141657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8831781,0.007098019,0.008685027,0.033142153,0.0013525869,0.000023948103,0.000042063453,0.00017075695,0.066307314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883156,0.007448536,0.0007676759,0.0007931738,0.001549436,0.0011255733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97844434,0.01827379,0.00074993534,0.0014805421,0.0006606052,0.0003908102],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016239611,0.00036787795,0.0005456656,0.000077806326,0.0022630808,0.000041487434,0.0011162711,0.002613713,0.0011478417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015265505,0.00036870083,0.00016567594,0.0005369132,0.00060793484,0.00069535256,0.0010164673,0.027365481,0.00078651006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009038646,0.00039687657,0.18493778,0.003893907,0.00025495802,0.00013746653,0.023600683,0.00015546336,0.0001230405,0.47216707,0.31237236,0.0010565404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001112234,0.0000619622,0.0070980447,0.0011775309,0.000077692406,0.000002639154,0.004962113,0.00011530241,0.000021197122,0.005794707,0.9791523,0.0004242734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087754196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016030295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82491153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053041003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022363444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210430162","doi":"10.1086/713947","title":"Index to Volume 131","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.13874349826592985,"score_gpt":0.41594711925122224,"score_spread":0.2772036209852924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210430162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043647736,0.000062807696,0.0013420531,0.4157565,0.0006735652,0.00005243726,0.0000071279683,0.00008149928,0.57765925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521852,0.00003473309,0.00042270735,0.031266484,0.0007951263,0.0000032699863,0.0000018395444,0.000006648559,0.015283997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853855,0.0003593091,0.00010272744,0.00015948965,0.0005209343,0.00031899172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985977,0.0006515832,0.000013419045,0.00016819175,0.00027629687,0.00029282662],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014216831,0.000053284,0.000083487794,0.000021076381,0.00053872325,0.00006883592,0.00017107898,0.0004010005,0.00049901335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008475349,0.000058848516,0.000046502817,0.0002992006,0.00029577978,0.00007647869,0.000074509524,0.0010813223,0.0008483782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017195109,0.000017737555,0.00044877504,0.000007274995,0.000003684312,0.000015567575,0.021771058,0.0000064110236,0.000023086064,0.9744457,0.0028875996,0.0003713935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034302528,0.000007657958,0.0009712236,0.00001209385,0.000003039512,4.257015e-7,0.0012918684,0.0000070308693,0.0001049392,0.35649675,0.64099336,0.0000773177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095490564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016767193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9478204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042925465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010365025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210574273","doi":"10.1086/713946","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Metaphysics; Moral philosophy; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Theology; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.15653136241803917,"score_gpt":0.32061704231834176,"score_spread":0.1640856799003026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210574273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020662833,0.0004140837,0.00008657562,0.23679566,0.002047839,0.00006579241,0.00009550988,0.00014771684,0.739684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97912943,0.00004920844,0.00001297222,0.018019548,0.0009177914,0.0000027880687,0.000015987027,0.000011297929,0.0018409864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992446,0.00012860668,0.000110466215,0.00014125035,0.00023553899,0.00013955538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747723,0.0019975873,0.00002773492,0.00017884861,0.00026359546,0.00005500224],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005445882,0.00008076012,0.00011093402,0.000019992076,0.00034234943,0.00011192505,0.00007965664,0.00014353397,0.0019317184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022125787,0.00006476107,0.00006986087,0.000019892905,0.0002840983,0.000038420312,0.00003604665,0.0011519301,0.0004058675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068504237,0.000042592947,0.000002960102,0.0000124233175,0.000014362714,0.000026046526,0.008830396,0.0000024316776,0.0000550643,0.9905312,0.00015966006,0.00031601236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009636372,0.000026032023,0.000008253673,0.000024078225,0.000005074335,7.582063e-7,0.00020161671,0.000007785684,0.0010875175,0.6544269,0.344047,0.00006864685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028017434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021286747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001259623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012004893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240472568","doi":"10.1086/700086","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Media studies; History","score_opus":0.17789257331736216,"score_gpt":0.44002885691677046,"score_spread":0.2621362835994083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240472568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011159828,0.000019956262,0.00031361563,0.26468262,0.0011151505,0.000077917095,0.000011637228,0.00013330289,0.72248596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804012,0.000020907528,0.000078959005,0.016655397,0.0021950002,0.0000016219241,0.000001028482,0.000004962331,0.0006409153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987641,0.00030103436,0.00008541549,0.00011735645,0.0004314745,0.000300643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962329,0.0032523654,0.000021967773,0.00012428976,0.00021809622,0.00015032427],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019725806,0.000056428722,0.00007439639,0.000022122764,0.00091381196,0.00004054544,0.00016297429,0.00039144116,0.0002064684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015123349,0.000049245336,0.000038647937,0.000119633514,0.0015305296,0.000057968988,0.000020565745,0.0008388173,0.0009995395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006187054,0.000015210279,0.000078692465,0.0000021472392,0.000003106183,0.0000011598602,0.012867995,1.7831397e-7,0.000011395891,0.98618877,0.00056291826,0.00026223276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068939065,0.00007515783,0.0002712123,0.000015598991,0.000003733825,7.905544e-8,0.00027304268,0.0000037355608,0.00073867757,0.5870544,0.41142154,0.00007393449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009684495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074455835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003434073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002942924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296779938","doi":"10.1086/720780","title":"Táíwò, Olúfẹmi O. <i>Reconsidering Reparations</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. 280. $33.99 (cloth).","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Economic history; Theology; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.0896249172726964,"score_gpt":0.30969661933287856,"score_spread":0.22007170206018217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296779938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058244895,0.0023928892,0.00061529304,0.024582531,0.0038180554,0.0008841989,0.0002555185,0.00066409656,0.9085425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5849592,0.012368618,0.001790991,0.004371852,0.0016333507,0.00005207315,0.0001089973,0.00008961004,0.3946253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976158,0.00057750935,0.00021655622,0.0003707272,0.00079225603,0.0004271619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875075,0.00044597118,0.0001541255,0.0002863229,0.00018050926,0.0001823382],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021280015,0.00014424995,0.00018737084,0.00007254385,0.003844332,0.000117009076,0.0004852218,0.00022206733,0.0011388656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046150107,0.00017443158,0.00012228341,0.0004905847,0.00032229317,0.00034939527,0.000349189,0.0013571777,0.0000126075865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087782835,0.00013224289,0.0023779112,0.000047430927,0.00008045649,0.0000804675,0.087982625,0.0006620969,0.00017013685,0.816937,0.08945431,0.0019875118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025985032,0.000034849894,0.00013688342,0.000010989652,0.000022654855,0.0000047165936,0.011750575,0.00020873499,0.00007226055,0.001187039,0.9860892,0.00022219245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017068167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033531096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89663494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021002493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092929683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311743327","doi":"10.1086/722129","title":":<i>The Right to Higher Education: A Political Theory</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Higher education; Politics; Sociology; Plea; Argument (complex analysis); Middle class; Law; Political science; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07690918853229915,"score_gpt":0.4038831134318028,"score_spread":0.3269739248995036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311743327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023942388,0.0000914637,0.000021006754,0.4899338,0.0015817651,0.00008608918,0.00000746319,0.000042714462,0.50799626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8489916,0.000006268401,0.000066612534,0.100421,0.0015055648,0.00007476092,0.0000018388544,0.000008585082,0.048923824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968269,0.001561122,0.00013544183,0.00015956472,0.00078542694,0.0005315537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513566,0.004106898,0.000021086033,0.00023438345,0.00012570513,0.00037629157],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004422408,0.000066316046,0.00006991461,0.00002512751,0.0048262407,0.00009047357,0.00049974717,0.00013455295,0.0014852135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021606043,0.00005379213,0.000057343324,0.00029305482,0.0007437419,0.000050894098,0.00016773569,0.0015913734,0.0002205876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009771163,0.000042839114,0.000010607387,0.0000024765568,0.0000040884747,0.0000013018287,0.006719447,0.0000010469984,0.000002148942,0.9815661,0.011452779,0.0001874169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016016218,0.00001408472,0.000041989268,0.000001564157,0.0000034815291,4.3955268e-7,0.0013644284,1.3945302e-7,0.0000066245507,0.49679416,0.5017123,0.000044754244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005256672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011061336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84875214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017196998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018167422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386763843","doi":"10.1086/725812","title":":<i>The Roots of Normativity</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Permission; Reuse; Library science; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Biology","score_opus":0.12340072441999769,"score_gpt":0.3137599496110649,"score_spread":0.1903592251910672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386763843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06030348,0.0003043649,0.00003811936,0.1487999,0.0022522155,0.00016025036,0.00006915274,0.00028637273,0.7877861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602187,0.00014711279,0.0000026587948,0.00094447297,0.00031638626,0.000004795771,0.0000038796325,0.000008545374,0.0025502963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926823,0.00011929716,0.000151133,0.00006483933,0.00026151064,0.0001350029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973293,0.0022671456,0.000055962784,0.00017816862,0.00014048807,0.000028968714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018748299,0.000054541684,0.00008003754,0.000029294693,0.0005604818,0.000054124426,0.00017373005,0.000079223886,0.00009354756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006996754,0.000035258094,0.000055317243,0.00005332571,0.00070591643,0.000055303808,0.00006993353,0.0007196177,0.00030921423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047707854,0.000007864944,0.0000029002802,0.000028085411,0.000009378199,0.0000011694874,0.015837707,0.000003509305,0.000055513105,0.98233503,0.0009184717,0.0007955855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041041876,0.00001547007,0.0000417189,0.000013199177,0.000002791469,1.5402534e-7,0.00055518816,0.000059193728,0.00010526145,0.67998195,0.31914765,0.000036409467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042091702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036444212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93571836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004128801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054182714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43108293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389802239","doi":"10.1086/727275","title":":<i>Subjects of Intergenerational Justice: Indigenous Philosophy, the Environment and Relationships</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Download; Economic Justice; Permission; Sociology; Reuse; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.0529604956228928,"score_gpt":0.2743060659527221,"score_spread":0.22134557032982932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389802239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754544,0.0002350591,0.00009368852,0.005387472,0.00015975704,0.00017816176,0.000014845588,0.000028088107,0.018448556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972461,0.00093339354,0.0003257921,0.00046848328,0.000048001166,0.000016084941,0.000013743058,0.0000058405763,0.00094255566],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991939,0.00008673904,0.0001441541,0.0001519279,0.00029874325,0.00012452688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995242,0.0002639913,0.000059972877,0.00011523912,0.0000019441397,0.00003470215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036460164,0.0000822991,0.00007299282,0.000007956362,0.00063123764,0.000007540531,0.00010883877,0.00006525271,0.00041346284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006444355,0.000051785057,0.000028484303,0.00012918958,0.00069489743,0.00005443762,0.00027650606,0.0003329086,0.00032854773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007446431,0.0004875866,0.6043257,0.0002825872,0.00024921322,0.00003093412,0.15723275,0.03818442,0.10832802,0.028091181,0.025428278,0.037284885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006523368,0.0004293094,0.8651446,0.000055133318,0.00020725056,0.000031471343,0.011481959,0.0010747244,0.006067725,0.048330884,0.065818354,0.00070623594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002277047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008325085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26081893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003336473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000034453174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48550335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392672923","doi":"10.1086/728629","title":":<i>Bias: A Philosophical Study</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.32545378093771543,"score_gpt":0.3729506229512032,"score_spread":0.04749684201348775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392672923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13739707,0.005439529,0.00028009628,0.17367443,0.017463617,0.0009314505,0.0001134229,0.0017309965,0.66296935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975879,0.00006744918,0.000039767932,0.003982127,0.0036827247,0.00002494889,0.000008959895,0.000037645,0.016277337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984809,0.00031207115,0.0002633166,0.00032227024,0.00038583376,0.00023556408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821496,0.0012249564,0.000032912285,0.00029344228,0.00016107837,0.00007263151],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001701714,0.00016515957,0.00021738949,0.00007540662,0.00039395367,0.00032494063,0.00019869319,0.00020659802,0.0005201809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036642308,0.00013413497,0.00013993763,0.000053210348,0.000642073,0.0001572429,0.000068252,0.002295282,0.00089049677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050485187,0.00011760697,0.000033432432,0.0001188714,0.00007068895,0.00006061702,0.19407575,8.600319e-7,0.000009139842,0.80139667,0.003590739,0.00052060914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013216957,0.00019576737,0.000019536259,0.000065295564,0.00007474993,0.000004678373,0.009650679,0.00005102219,0.00001947132,0.31449258,0.67511016,0.00018390692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013874471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090017536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83848196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022055043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018528741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402349420","doi":"10.1086/731427","title":":<i>Getting Things Right: Fittingness, Reasons, and Value</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.019211313242684568,"score_gpt":0.2498919865775157,"score_spread":0.23068067333483114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402349420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054039445,0.028279625,0.009885456,0.28446466,0.005543667,0.00092973857,0.000007135476,0.0037875576,0.61306274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96422416,0.00047316754,0.0018276274,0.024350023,0.00319064,0.000011752221,0.00003691448,0.00007109075,0.005814598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902195,0.000010978278,0.0001681769,0.0002856623,0.00031928578,0.00019394075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994906,0.00024601974,0.000056242123,0.0001026499,0.00009632742,0.000008122356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010122241,0.00014440327,0.000118532465,0.00011485438,0.00056333636,0.00076297106,0.00013059078,0.00009523172,0.00019463587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006394335,0.00012321403,0.000035171062,0.0004504461,0.00007509239,0.001007048,0.00034156037,0.00041814405,0.0002846329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021748242,0.000008944228,0.0050997315,0.00080867653,0.00004049804,0.000022534918,0.0004885778,0.000006281751,0.000037484275,0.95211655,0.039441742,0.0019267757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104741805,0.0000027352692,0.004401428,0.00026635366,0.000089472574,0.000001963516,0.0003231454,0.00399825,0.000022924922,0.10625085,0.8842807,0.00025742385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015995259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020265948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91018474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013740613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001727062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73573476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404952390","doi":"10.1086/732625","title":":<i>Morality and Socially Constructed Norms</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Sociology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.1249822985326092,"score_gpt":0.4246395499417757,"score_spread":0.29965725140916655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404952390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0135494005,0.00071899046,0.00015542509,0.48766968,0.0011980928,0.00011417571,0.000042204407,0.0003842706,0.49616775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99358755,0.00028248972,0.00038990815,0.0044244523,0.0006614681,0.0000021561357,0.0000023550976,0.0000071082927,0.0006425207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875104,0.00032017892,0.00012040675,0.00016982997,0.00037793414,0.00026061528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981321,0.0015178674,0.000012979916,0.000077915836,0.00009477727,0.00016434354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020516908,0.00006787911,0.00009466364,0.000025110845,0.0006276585,0.00018173861,0.00010417237,0.00044422408,0.00013269029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019411003,0.00006422195,0.000041185802,0.00018202791,0.0018861772,0.00015976417,0.000042046493,0.0012784792,0.0000728746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016438748,0.000004704246,0.00006892699,0.00005092287,0.000008624861,0.000008595009,0.019045439,6.9810426e-8,0.000021995978,0.9792011,0.0006604503,0.0009275533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035027915,0.000007439679,0.00027026574,0.000029158251,0.000011132224,0.0000010889786,0.0009769107,0.000011545282,0.000019260551,0.7870806,0.21147561,0.00008197624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012613517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012327022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98003817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034042037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015880966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69496983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417513363","doi":"10.1086/738306","title":": <i>Consent Under Duress</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.12150159450014478,"score_gpt":0.47423745330891603,"score_spread":0.35273585880877123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417513363","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025105525,0.007925625,0.0031360427,0.6942899,0.0020728614,0.00041150278,0.000009054393,0.00021434315,0.26683512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90053654,0.0015877135,0.0009407531,0.07287725,0.0003398363,0.0000088126,0.000009682672,0.00001190847,0.023687506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998969,0.00010877319,0.00021543726,0.00019397362,0.00030987896,0.00020292976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808323,0.0011723718,0.000030450488,0.00033351665,0.00026624795,0.00011416689],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009543406,0.000090963804,0.00017491067,0.00008073315,0.00014990206,0.000017114839,0.000076907454,0.0005093345,0.000095693125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016831356,0.00007872372,0.00006478341,0.0002611345,0.000121779514,0.000019009243,0.00005473327,0.0024496086,0.000060815775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008863757,0.00016541652,0.011961746,0.002232201,0.00009798003,0.0001237965,0.0043442603,0.000018887295,0.00035824074,0.90214384,0.07571111,0.0027539076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083558983,0.000093817194,0.008440619,0.00045083638,0.00010989551,0.000020923422,0.0008341768,0.000052188097,0.000849029,0.0411013,0.9470596,0.00015205813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002879854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013467761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.875431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006388806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017221307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417513414","doi":"10.1086/738314","title":": <i>Kant’s Reason: The Unity of Reason and the Limits of Comprehension in Kant</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Comprehension; Limit (mathematics)","score_opus":0.09361536783431028,"score_gpt":0.31371269324973977,"score_spread":0.22009732541542948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417513414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48176047,0.0058896914,0.000021531305,0.20683032,0.00060580345,0.0004362741,0.00004721286,0.000028395125,0.3043803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996003,0.0010791332,0.0000063819134,0.0024941876,0.000061487954,0.0000037510015,0.0000021409844,0.0000048914944,0.00034505254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987472,0.0005885523,0.00025223548,0.00010595817,0.00020914892,0.00009689939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507964,0.0043190615,0.00010513686,0.00027623828,0.0002029397,0.000016981858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025577515,0.00008393226,0.00021625221,0.000039258164,0.00024780756,0.000025489106,0.00020165666,0.00013831696,0.000027171809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009342759,0.00004345444,0.000054551645,0.00007215358,0.0021536588,0.000036197765,0.000112149064,0.0011790991,0.000001110282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012174322,0.00004013595,0.00004312859,0.00011103073,0.000017252287,6.6318717e-7,0.021606505,0.0000049045107,0.000048660946,0.97726685,0.00008518109,0.0006539727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006183344,0.000031860698,0.0005171499,0.0003391705,0.00002803096,6.138495e-7,0.0017086236,0.00022758992,0.00025682992,0.96189654,0.034322627,0.000052616764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079490157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016568444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51424253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006108906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009334618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7935245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417513428","doi":"10.1086/738305","title":": <i>Wrongs and Rights Come Apart</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Bill of rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.043773567484217395,"score_gpt":0.40163271503043807,"score_spread":0.35785914754622067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417513428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044051535,0.00023558117,0.00090103934,0.13046128,0.00020960382,0.00017583389,0.000005701924,0.00009683416,0.8238626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98274654,0.00009415092,0.00026426977,0.0025699565,0.00006690291,0.000008686132,0.0000010118945,0.0000014271146,0.014247031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995905,0.000057731828,0.00005843088,0.000086707114,0.00011060001,0.00009600646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995409,0.0002771365,0.000014273294,0.00008452952,0.000042713422,0.000040418345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005000489,0.000029283523,0.00004403482,0.000013588018,0.0007745339,0.000056228855,0.000097057644,0.00010040371,0.000030082703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104254046,0.000026333268,0.000013131759,0.00013037841,0.00023909309,0.000049475595,0.000037869082,0.0002638729,0.000030119798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2850124e-7,0.0000068440686,0.00036589635,0.000003935934,0.0000021236485,1.7198965e-7,0.005092347,4.0269381e-7,0.00001935827,0.99161136,0.002536778,0.00036034803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004155324,0.0000017654635,0.0008308332,0.0000065195063,0.0000037504437,4.2743434e-8,0.00032785133,0.000009380149,0.00005706795,0.11158492,0.88710684,0.000029497842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023698695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004555513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016793196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012300014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5957167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083311401","doi":"10.1086/736732","title":":<i>Dancing with the Devil: Why Bad Feelings Make Life Good</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Plant and fungal interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Work (physics); Motivated reasoning; Affect (linguistics)","score_opus":0.0357948238466952,"score_gpt":0.2626977618327608,"score_spread":0.2269029379860656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083311401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6949304,0.00040578085,0.00016873432,0.27155107,0.0004688187,0.00016854983,0.00003731454,0.00013598295,0.03213338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97040236,0.000052763862,0.000055589437,0.025131155,0.00018643854,0.000009069624,0.000015484191,4.4403225e-7,0.0041466886],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994407,0.00006251965,0.00008697908,0.00013019009,0.00013516472,0.00014440613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987003,0.0011099528,0.000036057478,0.000039494105,0.000075841905,0.000038310984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033268175,0.00007392357,0.000074253985,0.0000050625536,0.0004756403,0.00008687871,0.00018151457,0.00010605746,0.00006722245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001815227,0.000019467623,0.00003922467,0.00025165087,0.000053084557,0.000049598755,0.000042306416,0.0006266948,0.00003447111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003301515,0.0004504823,0.036978066,0.00008410095,0.00030668834,0.00003619911,0.0058786133,0.00010564192,0.41043258,0.10582211,0.3779317,0.061643653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007257381,0.000052719708,0.016479215,0.000075987555,0.000020891133,0.0000053515864,0.0008503945,0.00008368851,0.0014278926,0.0006473198,0.9801786,0.00010538102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036380417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008194927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6022469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009852535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027284268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4572962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}