{"meta":{"query_hash":"e24898964be8","filters":{"venue":"Ethics & Behavior"},"cohort_total":32,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":32,"exported":32,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e24898964be8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Ethics+%26+Behavior"},"results":[{"id":"W1742562591","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2011.570168","title":"Ethical Elder Care for Families","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Elder care; Psychology; Nursing; Medicine","score_opus":0.214425687137705,"score_gpt":0.4891901297156915,"score_spread":0.2747644425779865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1742562591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9349959,0.0013875379,0.0015224891,0.004427701,0.011233112,0.0036991702,0.00023493094,0.000666515,0.04183263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870852,0.000109315966,0.006062911,0.0019757396,0.0004454383,0.00094608474,0.000070774215,0.00006167976,0.0032428252],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826413,0.0003362599,0.00036515767,0.00029214428,0.00024938185,0.0004929068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805397,0.0007274475,0.000105681385,0.00036499032,0.0006132669,0.00013465497],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081569015,0.00016160785,0.00025549743,0.00009065963,0.00096477184,0.000006093714,0.00020527648,0.00170823,0.0008312705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041626915,0.00014476203,0.00014307877,0.00012643957,0.00013689084,0.00004586613,0.00007317407,0.0034067242,0.00020157025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023986162,0.0001966109,0.037038255,0.00054010353,0.000021249021,0.000018412271,0.8894287,3.9600135e-8,0.00044525604,0.023767129,0.022941487,0.025362931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024261263,0.00083090516,0.32618314,0.0004261167,0.00075942284,0.0000049994364,0.36274475,0.000001072429,0.002035188,0.004786992,0.2989188,0.0008824655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015944388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014116399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5266839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082561965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005231711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971296458","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1301_11","title":"The Ethical Ideologies of Psychologists and Physicians: A Preliminary Comparison","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Ideology; Ethical code; Psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Professional ethics; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.23590846624766024,"score_gpt":0.5820438396315746,"score_spread":0.3461353733839143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971296458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80135584,0.004542697,0.0019610962,0.15295783,0.004255473,0.0020921633,0.000020254889,0.00026509838,0.03254958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865722,0.0010081156,0.0034734798,0.007901417,0.00008310086,0.00025532482,0.0000030193166,0.000025517173,0.0006778246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874655,0.010110175,0.00080323475,0.00034712913,0.00077934685,0.00049459084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.941512,0.056786314,0.0005015709,0.000636046,0.000462749,0.00010135135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018872807,0.00017174981,0.00034894864,0.000037670332,0.0021369753,0.000013851112,0.00039093857,0.0022131104,0.00008180719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06747706,0.00012111204,0.000061649574,0.00018630984,0.0027092975,0.00007812793,0.00019975637,0.028187783,0.0000600698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033981816,0.0006544514,0.13324514,0.0004003365,0.000048247242,0.000039039816,0.04784013,0.0000024394408,0.0016368009,0.78449893,0.01669057,0.014604085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002374688,0.0015139326,0.54736733,0.0012745745,0.00055808894,0.000033614375,0.09788366,0.000049759372,0.0010387758,0.18039803,0.1667756,0.00073194026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121848614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022423321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6041009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000447647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040541566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984687891","doi":"10.1080/10508420802623682","title":"Believers and Skeptics: Where Social Worker Situate Themselves Regarding the Code of Ethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Ethical code; Variety (cybernetics); Engineering ethics; EXPOSE; Code (set theory); Code of conduct; Sociology; Faith; Meta-ethics; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Law; Nursing ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Set (abstract data type); Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.1265037699525921,"score_gpt":0.44622810042307265,"score_spread":0.31972433047048054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984687891","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3958779,0.00086549175,0.00011757386,0.56181,0.0012700867,0.00058461947,0.000017896267,0.00012426003,0.039332144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891008,0.0008653126,0.00053892005,0.0029826835,0.00042029424,0.0000131264405,0.0000023513958,0.000012573145,0.006063914],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997509,0.001100482,0.00022774741,0.00018915211,0.00070692133,0.00026669545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996506,0.00266843,0.00022078653,0.00015712304,0.00036132708,0.00008636837],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049301563,0.000113314054,0.00016156682,0.000033731776,0.003088997,0.00015566137,0.00028155488,0.0005846395,0.0002714879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025057986,0.00009616394,0.0000845992,0.00042326644,0.0008428414,0.00021146549,0.00003347103,0.001982319,0.000021495345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029851226,0.00013892274,0.005160562,0.000009383221,0.000022293674,0.000002649541,0.699372,0.0000010461163,0.0003540669,0.2659203,0.0072046234,0.021784283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004749014,0.000065483364,0.080739625,0.000073249634,0.00039283355,0.0000026169846,0.28804114,0.0000026202363,0.00016982268,0.016747758,0.6128743,0.00041563684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055165985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024519712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6056697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062289415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063471374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990651003","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1301_10","title":"Voluntary Assent in Biomedical Research With Adolescents: A Comparison of Parent and Adolescent Views","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institutes of Health; University of Warwick","keywords":"Vignette; Autonomy; Psychology; Informed consent; Turnover; Perception; Social psychology; Asthma; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.751738866568881,"score_gpt":0.6569981701594663,"score_spread":0.09474069640941474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990651003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99115765,0.001257646,0.0001308553,0.00547371,0.00014222956,0.0013671009,0.0000104156115,0.000022410815,0.00043800546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960345,0.00092181866,0.0020756607,0.00043785383,0.00005317549,0.000118757926,0.000015963118,0.0000397703,0.0003024849],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99226177,0.001394711,0.0010426173,0.0006656337,0.003931514,0.0007037789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99331397,0.003945383,0.00014219312,0.000785991,0.0011980752,0.0006143656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01675434,0.00020910228,0.00069233275,0.00043226988,0.00012705538,0.00002636297,0.00025936705,0.0009508393,0.00012644441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010903668,0.00016203348,0.00007831838,0.0007955237,0.0020241137,0.000049116552,0.00021959464,0.012862268,0.000021434127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040442427,0.005629088,0.98273295,0.0012290686,0.000015466296,0.00020018168,0.0019692876,4.9412915e-7,0.002273118,0.0020303542,0.00052979495,0.0029857608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038141026,0.0026055144,0.9721601,0.008205966,0.000110510184,0.00004408407,0.0032486957,0.000048800146,0.0027290806,0.00081332366,0.0059709605,0.00024884354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002813925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019005879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119114285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027433826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017666282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99742794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996875105","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2013.869747","title":"Cognitive Enhancement and Academic Misconduct: A Study Exploring Their Frequency and Relationship","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Cheating; Psychology; Cognition; Scientific misconduct; German; Academic integrity; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Medical education; Law; Social psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; History; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.33474939909622264,"score_gpt":0.42572240834233166,"score_spread":0.09097300924610902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996875105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99176645,0.000527796,0.000121561236,0.004222811,0.00026062742,0.00095669454,0.000007713658,0.000043545933,0.0020927864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973804,0.0005603928,0.00020846541,0.00027829787,0.00015275169,0.0004833136,0.000005156176,0.000009382436,0.00092185865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825674,0.0005887834,0.00023088019,0.00028530622,0.00036989973,0.00026838726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785703,0.0016359309,0.000082785766,0.00008462942,0.00019445964,0.00014516228],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027803588,0.00012574373,0.0001372554,0.00006124566,0.0009630934,0.00008388363,0.00013667009,0.00076872593,0.00025825977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018401105,0.00011371874,0.000020300991,0.00012701504,0.00045102078,0.0006315086,0.00006588211,0.004680012,0.000049622195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039195274,0.00009729778,0.39333785,0.000008249051,0.000014557561,0.000011889395,0.57653713,1.5557287e-8,0.0015355808,0.018204438,0.000085618565,0.010163481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060295,0.0001722574,0.49032733,0.0001999884,0.00017597606,0.000011131091,0.4803045,0.000003430283,0.0008463189,0.02582832,0.0010712675,0.00045652012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063070673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091009843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0969895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004722255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014970661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99761623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001126839","doi":"10.1080/10508420903035455","title":"A Second Look at Debriefing Practices: Madness in Our Method?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Regina","funders":"American Psychological Association","keywords":"Debriefing; Popularity; Psychology; Personality; Function (biology); Applied psychology; Trustworthiness; Medical education; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Medicine","score_opus":0.15553021567146233,"score_gpt":0.5011636353466175,"score_spread":0.34563341967515515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001126839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97873265,0.0005777684,0.0005522446,0.010494075,0.00074434985,0.0005673158,0.00001880215,0.00008965534,0.008223153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747903,0.00002433866,0.0056879576,0.008894588,0.00017492686,0.0001495483,0.00003349565,0.00002832032,0.010216575],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975552,0.000746822,0.000463197,0.000468868,0.00027530294,0.000490631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983872,0.0004967071,0.0003617342,0.000460497,0.00011077161,0.00018309512],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023949873,0.00018105558,0.0002484677,0.0001521527,0.0002086737,0.000041493324,0.00019543861,0.0005950323,0.0018652898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038378098,0.00018743664,0.000064033826,0.00025124624,0.000021546835,0.00017160871,0.000023882618,0.0015876325,0.00044488648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011115145,0.004526734,0.2407075,0.00031947703,0.000069609276,0.0022398124,0.47495088,0.000012714017,0.007642493,0.07182031,0.034684245,0.16191469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020795327,0.00031540933,0.9215804,0.00007440839,0.0001126781,0.00033050627,0.0076526524,0.000018524599,0.0007959494,0.0013910912,0.06514711,0.0005017767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012294361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017248716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68087286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116375406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022630388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006269789","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1202_4","title":"On Boredom and Experimentation in Humans","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Boredom; Debriefing; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Informed consent; Ethical issues; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.1883832211984424,"score_gpt":0.3834059668395874,"score_spread":0.195022745641145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006269789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982459,0.000026321488,0.00002918854,0.00042531348,0.00012106195,0.00009537012,0.0000021355718,0.000025259462,0.0010294432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871397,0.000039187526,0.00004179436,0.0003879426,0.000015135588,0.000031323532,0.000001025421,0.0000067459305,0.0007628616],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939626,0.00006839953,0.000089531975,0.00018890845,0.00015985861,0.0000970579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975795,0.000098091245,0.00002333328,0.000087927794,0.0000063398124,0.00002636895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000119765115,0.000055526725,0.00004729248,0.00005512963,0.0001024088,0.00003471117,0.00004282001,0.00007354325,0.00017826105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010593979,0.00005480369,0.00001304362,0.00006509791,0.000053692303,0.00006668074,0.000012556236,0.0003009074,0.000040544237],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009929742,0.00043278342,0.005418619,0.000008289216,3.3205959e-7,0.00005563876,0.013494853,0.000009183658,0.9549602,0.013796088,0.00024847517,0.011565573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021557,0.00047438676,0.14184962,0.0001409683,0.000022466662,0.000016490392,0.0012163918,0.0006085778,0.8497416,0.0016108556,0.001658397,0.0005045576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024284485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015578069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13643101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016584245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033139434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22348297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020903994","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1604_7","title":"The Research Ethics Review Process and Ethics Review Narratives","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Research ethics; Sociology; Narrative review; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7844652283520209,"score_gpt":0.7154801608445555,"score_spread":0.06898506750746547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020903994","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054380423,0.3967594,0.000024112407,0.58720684,0.00023746985,0.0032526718,0.000017568671,0.00010554678,0.006958388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020984186,0.93307763,0.0009826928,0.0296676,0.00045736795,0.0010167271,0.000046558165,0.00010928248,0.013657949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97871,0.007380842,0.0017704933,0.0012445824,0.0096075935,0.0012865092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7619762,0.2100941,0.0006325658,0.0036934945,0.022625,0.0009786779],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16541818,0.0003957414,0.0009282605,0.00013597419,0.0027965966,0.000191336,0.0010045883,0.0031144307,0.0002275857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27405354,0.0002644309,0.00024886488,0.0013942323,0.0054955166,0.00015697842,0.00059030723,0.08240249,0.00015804902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038062813,0.0023574352,0.012878865,0.29457182,0.00019161247,0.0008820539,0.027904352,5.353901e-7,0.0017537627,0.5604897,0.075803444,0.02278579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014870361,0.0014557788,0.013449088,0.23960936,0.0008812398,0.0003092041,0.0035698016,0.000005737992,0.0008482791,0.17758949,0.5597699,0.0010250767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026825053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020984348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5575392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018382288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075418823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025563565","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1503_1","title":"To Stay or To Go, To Speak or Stay Silent, To Act or Not To Act: Moral Distress as Experienced by Psychologists","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Psychology; Distress; Context (archaeology); Moral disengagement; Social psychology; Moral injury; Mental health; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.31491427233811625,"score_gpt":0.6148544175381077,"score_spread":0.2999401451999914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025563565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77625465,0.000013273251,0.0023284266,0.20787804,0.0033891296,0.0058494736,0.0006996551,0.0003839349,0.0032033927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63181084,0.00004093563,0.035239074,0.2373909,0.0011809972,0.0037895583,0.000060598653,0.00021378616,0.09027333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881779,0.0030102406,0.0017029054,0.0018878827,0.0029435654,0.0022774942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98145545,0.010745662,0.00035962617,0.0022704282,0.0010131774,0.0041556307],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008714491,0.00077043386,0.00092961226,0.00035687108,0.0018255786,0.00016983927,0.0022725058,0.0019049589,0.01559979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07042848,0.000574889,0.00013067327,0.0016576416,0.0002744746,0.00048043748,0.0015128106,0.0113248,0.017208364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017291162,0.0027945577,0.0049347044,0.00026641935,0.000051485025,0.0008776493,0.3311859,0.000055066852,0.031554256,0.0016068912,0.5540514,0.055330478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017637874,0.0037945374,0.019618237,0.0010076218,0.00013957838,0.000021693966,0.031480085,0.0000030716017,0.0066090627,0.00006335775,0.9339706,0.001528373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019263184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022394836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37991917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001286982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020465318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039778749","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1203_3","title":"Applied Ethics in Mental Health in Cuba: Part II-Power Differentials, Dilemmas, Resources, and Limitations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical code; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Nursing ethics; Ethical dilemma; Criticism; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Mental health; Applied ethics; Professional conduct; Action (physics); Professional ethics; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.17820550185771147,"score_gpt":0.3965893256575285,"score_spread":0.21838382379981705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039778749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514869,0.0051579694,0.000017314693,0.038952906,0.0008805497,0.000624226,0.000046145335,0.000059103557,0.0027748737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98790014,0.007909592,0.00028928462,0.002454306,0.000059059763,0.00013944598,0.000058390473,0.00003731817,0.001152482],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752676,0.0006287237,0.00054980454,0.00049220165,0.00037996424,0.0004225598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980505,0.0012589358,0.00013587445,0.000376248,0.000047690053,0.00013073572],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021573761,0.00019879923,0.00029440378,0.00020159646,0.0004152708,0.00006529766,0.00016282132,0.0006053361,0.0009876554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024289968,0.00020516619,0.00004468339,0.00025700938,0.00012913096,0.00009955661,0.000100455145,0.0032263882,0.00007026683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016782482,0.003608237,0.012234438,0.0000484275,0.000024542329,0.000052657044,0.78691286,0.000004907972,0.00045856714,0.01291354,0.009741136,0.17383285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028290926,0.00041795472,0.1255046,0.0001930221,0.000047976668,0.000025315254,0.010872739,0.00007469485,0.000009344396,0.0003941209,0.8591016,0.0005295307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010265117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00792152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84936047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006374603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000540957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061925875","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1602_1","title":"A Re-Visioning of Boundaries in Professional Helping Relationships: Exploring Other Metaphors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Bridge (graph theory); Boundary (topology); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Professional boundaries; Ethical issues; Epistemology; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2411299620485944,"score_gpt":0.4291522961316174,"score_spread":0.18802233408302296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061925875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99309856,0.0016544898,0.00018237295,0.0010941945,0.0019828056,0.00022040914,0.0000073172764,0.000048219827,0.001711642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963771,0.000035980316,0.0015594019,0.000090345835,0.00009027228,0.00014664674,0.000011334173,0.00003244517,0.0016564743],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790287,0.0005834729,0.0005406473,0.00029733666,0.0004271192,0.0002485812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980759,0.0012524149,0.00018076715,0.00032106185,0.00013586461,0.000033975542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002962709,0.00013443646,0.00021044374,0.00022291996,0.00043677524,0.000073154326,0.00014848048,0.0003109515,0.0006670816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042404683,0.00012780538,0.000079375764,0.00031873907,0.00013874733,0.000326325,0.00005123192,0.0016256369,0.00004638977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036247095,0.0015856916,0.67866963,0.00009083869,0.00004167769,0.000114445356,0.22394001,0.00020101333,0.005244117,0.057410706,0.0010116443,0.03132775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020760705,0.00022042288,0.745095,0.0014595449,0.00025999668,0.000015794572,0.07501115,0.00017561637,0.0011397398,0.004504188,0.16918868,0.0008537683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043849195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028121746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16817704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032916352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001501136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73040766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069671793","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1302_05","title":"Dual Relationship Activities: Principal Component Analysis of Counselors' Attitudes","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Principal component analysis; Typology; Deliverable; Psychology; Dual (grammatical number); Exploratory factor analysis; Variance (accounting); Social psychology; Dual purpose; Survey instrument; Statistics; Applied psychology; Mathematics; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Accounting","score_opus":0.13685579921796773,"score_gpt":0.42952336060121915,"score_spread":0.29266756138325145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069671793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951054,0.00064120325,0.00042172242,0.00023554466,0.0006628379,0.00018454157,0.00004013144,0.00004972739,0.0026589076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742347,0.00012106514,0.0006624598,0.00011938376,0.000029835555,0.000048591384,0.000046809273,0.000021135786,0.0015272786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773514,0.0006757476,0.00044182435,0.00034038653,0.0005620441,0.0002448324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966303,0.0023277833,0.00020889014,0.0005667447,0.00018309827,0.00008318308],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022205904,0.00015830695,0.0003350146,0.0002999245,0.00022591307,0.000038817387,0.00013915036,0.00037845463,0.0024845242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034055774,0.00015763594,0.0002162567,0.0006287769,0.00013858921,0.00014059605,0.000020731028,0.0010551619,0.000065277054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015124804,0.002240704,0.8576995,0.000038226095,0.00097474153,0.00007373794,0.058794934,0.00028276883,0.0019330324,0.074343525,0.00026197347,0.0032055695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057947857,0.00014597324,0.953742,0.000026461252,0.0030322364,0.00001769191,0.0028223,0.00006193219,0.00013281169,0.00010875124,0.039013166,0.00031718824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005073045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005712187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09604247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037371952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011665974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070221634","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2013.865525","title":"The Judas Within: A Look at the Sexual Abuse Crisis in the Catholic Church","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"John Jay College of Criminal Justice","keywords":"Sexual abuse; Criminology; Psychology; Theology; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine; Medical emergency; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.08772144611088523,"score_gpt":0.38744481117542645,"score_spread":0.2997233650645412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070221634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89922464,0.00063693605,4.4210543e-7,0.096748956,0.00038763753,0.0011271709,0.000006114021,0.00004946473,0.001818617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98683035,0.0003618107,0.000035938698,0.0029745912,0.0002876772,0.0009262736,0.000002466591,0.00001539908,0.008565478],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618316,0.0014330078,0.00031061607,0.00029435373,0.0012042678,0.0005746192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969864,0.0020497125,0.00013796093,0.00046964476,0.00027702298,0.00007924149],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044830823,0.00019225384,0.0001704572,0.000017405124,0.0055424557,0.0004888786,0.0010799817,0.00030636723,0.00019640858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009122147,0.00008185117,0.000091400216,0.00037885184,0.0017752614,0.00020932371,0.00019086747,0.0016806099,0.00046186772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038818625,0.000063602914,0.011612054,0.000002917696,0.0000107844135,0.000005689218,0.97457725,0.0000024425929,0.00022527215,0.0026988662,0.0095172655,0.0012799464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024579893,0.000046395042,0.25460327,0.000013457,0.00009690307,0.000003920558,0.59943527,0.000004420856,0.000076044664,0.0003482891,0.1448364,0.0002898673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094159774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15781997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37514204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028959863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001412805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075988183","doi":"10.1080/10508420802063863","title":"Empirical Research on Ethical Issues in Pediatric Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Empirical research; Variety (cybernetics); Nothing; Food and drug administration; Ethical issues; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.641743448509592,"score_gpt":0.6522462024212058,"score_spread":0.010502753911613816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075988183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8335692,0.0020181208,0.0000017317938,0.15517904,0.0003832921,0.00094137766,0.00000883789,0.00009557731,0.007802803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769696,0.010242477,0.0007330636,0.0038000196,0.0025932693,0.00026575988,0.000026032927,0.00008051741,0.0052892477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865514,0.0044059325,0.00080616854,0.0009906038,0.005747922,0.0014979645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98630255,0.009227964,0.00005405081,0.0010748358,0.0025934514,0.0007471194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029069973,0.00026474582,0.0005752964,0.0016375276,0.0010094569,0.000051117364,0.00048897107,0.0039033599,0.00030551798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014975972,0.00023707347,0.00014143076,0.0032100363,0.0012602789,0.000072711664,0.0003126999,0.054459613,0.00093989406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044866317,0.0021232637,0.8860065,0.00048174008,0.0000075031585,0.0077292626,0.03685721,0.000002663423,0.000096174306,0.014307372,0.050571624,0.0013680469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017766997,0.003099767,0.83687544,0.00027625414,0.000049044727,0.00021817103,0.0018231712,0.000021654392,0.00033931425,0.0023249271,0.15273815,0.00045743465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002208781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043157386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15137902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054090086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003638149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079178579","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2014.950270","title":"Structural and Interpersonal Benefits and Risks of Participation in HIV Research: Perspectives of Female Sex Workers in Guatemala","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Sex work; Interpersonal communication; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Population; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Environmental health; Family medicine; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.2737290850287933,"score_gpt":0.5003943284700195,"score_spread":0.22666524344122624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079178579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99767846,0.0009705429,8.2015777e-7,0.00068321684,0.000042294505,0.00016745538,0.0000017088925,0.000005958436,0.00044954123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993608,0.0003283273,0.00013397465,0.0000044297026,0.000023984681,0.000011833896,0.0000012383468,0.00000529905,0.00013009248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840873,0.0006709082,0.00019872094,0.00017471345,0.00035015726,0.00019674245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990754,0.0006030906,0.000062443796,0.00007346006,0.00013200931,0.000053560318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027000539,0.000060538165,0.00015421436,0.00016619197,0.00012674966,0.000021392421,0.00008323139,0.00024145137,0.00002924652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073045085,0.000054992077,0.000017007666,0.00029103167,0.0009004668,0.0000913326,0.00004611602,0.00063422363,6.164257e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016421473,0.00002801728,0.6159829,0.0000080505215,0.0000021341912,9.756931e-7,0.3773154,0.000014775473,0.000108638465,0.0017654182,0.0000015079263,0.0047557787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024449825,0.000057160712,0.7427252,0.00018446216,0.000009723656,2.8304996e-7,0.25592038,0.00008612265,0.000294287,0.00040271782,0.00001784895,0.000057323363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071310294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006032403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12674233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000376797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000712407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081971933","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1304_2","title":"Animal Ethical Evaluation: An Observational Study of Canadian IACUCs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research; Medical Research Council Canada","keywords":"Observational study; Protocol (science); Psychology; Animal testing; Observational methods in psychology; Animal welfare; Psychological intervention; Ethical issues; Research ethics; Observer (physics); Relation (database); Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Biology","score_opus":0.822465978733046,"score_gpt":0.5727639251869654,"score_spread":0.24970205354608066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081971933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99607843,0.000025754904,0.000006024816,0.0005515027,0.00016110182,0.0004299228,0.000029906014,0.00004276308,0.0026745668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975575,0.0000015321729,0.0017898297,0.00031091843,0.00008721414,0.000091042035,0.000026899801,0.00002381853,0.00011123989],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972346,0.0010167841,0.0003364792,0.00032342647,0.0008541563,0.00023454531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983271,0.00038034515,0.00011275674,0.00028791677,0.0006939553,0.0001979497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029679385,0.00014506659,0.00017185372,0.00019505632,0.00029262825,0.000033763004,0.00020630858,0.0003294075,0.0007285781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001620618,0.00014800325,0.000043352746,0.00035523617,0.00010809748,0.00012318682,0.000024236022,0.0014521213,0.000027816064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019299713,0.0028527277,0.87750864,0.000024657105,0.00006075172,0.00033124335,0.0357039,0.000043960703,0.018203903,0.062797084,0.00033552514,0.0019445798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064803695,0.0039195837,0.98893154,0.000024443449,0.00012928476,0.000045625533,0.004124332,0.00024500708,0.00019104747,0.0004612484,0.0010511931,0.0002286731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042281058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051047057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11142286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009053274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009476208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96626884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093840756","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2012.748634","title":"What Would I Do? Civilians' Ethical Decision Making in Response to Military Dilemmas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Moral dilemma; Psychology; Social psychology; Social dilemma; Dimension (graph theory); Ethical decision; Dilemma; Moral reasoning; Ethical dilemma; Moral disengagement; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.20171761796542453,"score_gpt":0.4172194608172201,"score_spread":0.21550184285179558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093840756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95746547,0.00030416332,0.00015266593,0.038604744,0.002940072,0.000349543,0.000012524674,0.00005764983,0.00011314315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679023,0.000112350084,0.0016112903,0.02986847,0.00013221712,0.000091273156,0.000001658189,0.000023289185,0.0002571354],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965842,0.0009565518,0.00038700158,0.00056424626,0.00087392377,0.0006340752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672276,0.0024668197,0.000041861036,0.0004447446,0.00004849588,0.00027531982],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040290607,0.00020691623,0.00020637538,0.00024262795,0.00022464842,0.000053021216,0.0004338245,0.0012425999,0.0003450524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030039535,0.00019158979,0.00009453376,0.00039495877,0.00022825501,0.00047301358,0.00024049333,0.0044148304,0.0006831537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007671432,0.0035654355,0.06937149,0.000042150776,0.0000060909438,0.00093690515,0.044527553,0.00013891973,0.7338991,0.007982616,0.00834076,0.12351751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078137417,0.00032094485,0.9565759,0.00071121444,0.000022790135,0.00012391737,0.00072564586,0.000012115073,0.0088089565,0.0025820436,0.028810179,0.00052495877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020718833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007172438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88720435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013921194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007038542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116064712","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1002_03","title":"Value-Based Leadership in Organizations: Balancing Values, Interests, and Power Among Citizens, Workers, and Leaders","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Value (mathematics); Power (physics); Public relations; Promotion (chess); Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2070177051205732,"score_gpt":0.4306549328162699,"score_spread":0.2236372276956967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116064712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979323,0.00091965595,0.00005732142,0.017280454,0.00025098637,0.0010904587,0.000009855466,0.00013156426,0.0009366686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98512334,0.00025503486,0.0015530986,0.01076128,0.000039031413,0.00013803647,0.000049291917,0.000049366834,0.0020314967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688166,0.0012044418,0.0005926745,0.00032965522,0.00030023497,0.0006913476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974606,0.0016236878,0.000102064536,0.00034910394,0.00015368704,0.00031083517],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021881838,0.00021747126,0.00028934953,0.00020987073,0.0010337702,0.000030329642,0.0001613185,0.0005907093,0.0011180774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083020027,0.00022474337,0.000020549845,0.00047027186,0.0003319999,0.00012590388,0.00009047447,0.0032780904,0.00006746107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052964795,0.00007985631,0.94271815,0.00027330924,0.000004269315,0.000018850942,0.050854433,0.0000061636038,0.000016593725,0.00024142876,0.0015887711,0.004145213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014511407,0.000058611622,0.94722074,0.0015854042,0.000027418619,0.0000030758538,0.046564963,0.00006559581,0.000012476966,0.00026480563,0.0024602413,0.0002855528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002226636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042104884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065191733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024608447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011552979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146163237","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1501_3","title":"How Informed Is Online Informed Consent?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Presentation (obstetrics); Recall; Reading (process); Computer science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Political science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.34050175538961064,"score_gpt":0.5363866975708118,"score_spread":0.19588494218120117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146163237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8008624,0.00042478862,0.0009138927,0.16493113,0.0010206891,0.0008517563,0.00018567251,0.00029569404,0.030513985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76318645,0.0013623768,0.12863778,0.016536005,0.0015429073,0.00014857086,0.00008777228,0.000055680786,0.08844245],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763674,0.0005428318,0.00031249257,0.00020737505,0.0008137673,0.0004868119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959547,0.0030528603,0.00016232095,0.00023997761,0.0003525794,0.00023754766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023663093,0.00016816826,0.00022405706,0.00010228298,0.0007014501,0.00022296714,0.00032301503,0.00042974864,0.0005537914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064005447,0.00015408991,0.0001313228,0.0003400298,0.00091506896,0.00055276015,0.00006428198,0.00093260664,0.00010254878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000316049,0.00039056427,0.0068735513,0.000051675805,0.000027291448,0.00001369406,0.60170496,6.4316225e-7,0.00039072294,0.1510546,0.016870832,0.22258987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000418669,0.000065460736,0.008622694,0.00003846256,0.000040950097,0.0000015887714,0.045782212,0.0000038655458,0.00052029727,0.00068002485,0.9435522,0.00027357702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019368938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04379209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92668134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020849214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002057117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97365624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790852260","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1447383","title":"Can Norman Daniels Help You Get a Wheelchair? A Commentary on Durocher et al.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bruyère; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Wheelchair; Equity (law); Distributive justice; Assistive technology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Health care; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Health equity; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Internet privacy; Computer science; Political science; Law; Human–computer interaction; Engineering","score_opus":0.15806946166175265,"score_gpt":0.5003347327486768,"score_spread":0.34226527108692417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790852260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55570215,0.00003455125,0.00018977893,0.4299428,0.0008378845,0.0011501531,0.0001426497,0.0005031235,0.011496919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72217274,0.000046645742,0.00084421097,0.27454636,0.00008924846,0.00057856785,0.00007954364,0.000032813117,0.0016098847],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969259,0.0014365849,0.00047060763,0.00038675746,0.00032756035,0.0004526072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996852,0.000851372,0.0002255642,0.0015315067,0.00039519824,0.00014440267],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024430726,0.00021422976,0.0002464929,0.000104780374,0.0014697941,0.000009201218,0.00062175083,0.0006760873,0.0010378564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000429644,0.00019958937,0.00007115203,0.00017351245,0.00066981226,0.00006273532,0.0005495373,0.0048644673,0.0005810467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012896673,0.001171,0.3796043,0.00003669124,0.00003738226,0.000014396235,0.019538082,1.17963445e-7,0.0023250817,0.011241352,0.58150387,0.004398743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008812517,0.00037661908,0.23402798,0.00016122707,0.000054660508,0.0000023372318,0.0038592773,0.000009946722,0.00052648486,0.00047810204,0.7593423,0.00027977573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012721388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00859528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17783844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030319864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033746072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800434608","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1466301","title":"A Wake-Up Call? Issues With Plagiarism in Transnational Higher Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Collusion; Work (physics); Plagiarism detection; Higher education; Academic integrity; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Business; Engineering; Medicine; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.06700317219200898,"score_gpt":0.4109973970169084,"score_spread":0.34399422482489944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800434608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7533001,0.00020950308,0.00024645522,0.19820851,0.0029522334,0.00063928956,0.000025442241,0.00011864497,0.04429984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565835,0.00003653962,0.0011803345,0.0020141017,0.00089719566,0.00007502542,0.000025523625,0.000012669579,0.03917512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982326,0.00033536972,0.00018940053,0.00023573171,0.00073873065,0.00026819145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912465,0.00021612352,0.00005956055,0.00011505034,0.00038975058,0.00009488979],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001977476,0.00010829628,0.000114233444,0.000100863566,0.0004315852,0.000059663445,0.00026010518,0.0015304753,0.0012629646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014685898,0.00009762182,0.000030618245,0.000281481,0.0006318076,0.00020425441,0.000012838931,0.003017412,0.000067246525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038366543,0.00019606746,0.021143066,0.00000606636,0.0000056912854,0.0000042304637,0.10928651,4.673639e-7,0.00021823242,0.85674894,0.008522302,0.0038300806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000377866,0.0001051615,0.1361666,0.00006520333,0.00004799586,0.0000033934268,0.0051030708,0.000004121336,0.00045085608,0.010633457,0.8467157,0.00032660758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00713841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0180127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84611547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013269793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014012789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898159239","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1526087","title":"How Can Ethics Support Innovative Health Care for an Aging Population?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"AGE-WELL; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Autonomy; Population ageing; Bioethics; Dementia; Health care; Agency (philosophy); Population; Face (sociological concept); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Law; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.3627123737524311,"score_gpt":0.6071143627369627,"score_spread":0.24440198898453164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898159239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83985656,0.00025208067,0.00034293198,0.15445389,0.002773404,0.0014542537,0.00024838475,0.00012994769,0.0004885327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98116565,0.000021888503,0.0015853059,0.010926149,0.0012792145,0.0006080783,0.0013655106,0.000057707024,0.002990492],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643165,0.0014653588,0.00038613044,0.00058162375,0.0003987052,0.00073652295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949031,0.00091502845,0.00021459078,0.00061600143,0.0030934068,0.00025790063],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004324567,0.0001892451,0.00030036806,0.00020877046,0.0016137069,0.00007390065,0.00031497373,0.0010840598,0.00020936965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000775522,0.00019962584,0.000057131838,0.00043541167,0.000534013,0.00013125787,0.00004243456,0.0030991342,0.000023835595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026165677,0.00016476423,0.3051663,0.00009882769,0.00002189549,0.0000026651971,0.6250198,2.9647152e-8,0.000033304466,0.046588432,0.004547866,0.01832996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007086689,0.0025169738,0.7202233,0.00004344075,0.00003433765,0.000016655471,0.21979009,8.149095e-7,0.00009122154,0.0017122375,0.054458156,0.00040412333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010216169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032988958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41505697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033315909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031186263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908879940","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1563866","title":"The End of Dependence? Ethical Issues in the Adoption of Assistive Technologies: An Introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Assistive technology; Sustainability; Reflection (computer programming); Point (geometry); Ethical issues; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.05538514951678071,"score_gpt":0.4194989172025427,"score_spread":0.364113767685762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908879940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86503583,0.0011105482,0.000023806959,0.1324272,0.0004419589,0.00069289637,0.000010141503,0.000039647897,0.0002179374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972937,0.0012894695,0.000691787,0.0002742169,0.00021944752,0.00004992022,0.000021043079,0.000011897365,0.00014851599],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976502,0.00051969645,0.0004778674,0.00026345457,0.0008865807,0.00020220112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971685,0.0012913329,0.00020200263,0.0007225857,0.0005834571,0.000032144668],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059016286,0.00011440281,0.00027038442,0.00010358,0.00011071255,0.000015769474,0.00031473232,0.001232467,0.000034341963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027751236,0.000067018715,0.00006530739,0.0003853603,0.0006226507,0.0000694069,0.00005943735,0.005735332,0.000007750427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064400025,0.0013933684,0.42765963,0.0010756582,0.00004885484,0.000067566594,0.06313172,0.000018876559,0.015842946,0.39657432,0.0006998673,0.0928432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016153989,0.004592197,0.8040941,0.0004895327,0.00047249056,0.00011246889,0.10435891,0.00013173744,0.015624721,0.0076062446,0.060448483,0.0004537618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007604571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005561368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38896808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006261105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037077817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990733516","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2019.1694024","title":"Examining the impact of ethical leadership and organizational justice on employees’ ethical behavior: Does person–organization fit play a role?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical leadership; Organizational justice; Economic Justice; Organizational culture; Business ethics; Psychology; Public relations; Organizational behavior; Organizational commitment; Organizational ethics; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.34697053580149584,"score_gpt":0.45459607426543114,"score_spread":0.1076255384639353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990733516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803785,0.00005047888,0.00021053177,0.017517358,0.0009829769,0.00047050137,0.00004552743,0.000056041128,0.00028808648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966709,0.000038101265,0.0004045272,0.0018435626,0.00024903385,0.000029976347,0.000044834116,0.000059858856,0.0006592156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941533,0.0011270561,0.000746525,0.00078700046,0.0027880897,0.00039801252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98065954,0.014902484,0.00048423195,0.0009235518,0.0028420002,0.0001881913],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008503716,0.00032396053,0.00041683787,0.0002991154,0.00073106826,0.00047431487,0.00089185213,0.0023229881,0.0016208466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028191466,0.00019108116,0.00010731432,0.0014994219,0.00076848955,0.00024999536,0.00018764069,0.00644289,0.00017927532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053089752,0.000418615,0.89350617,0.000045646942,0.000023772593,0.000005279444,0.058795687,0.00027405078,0.0075640655,0.03745115,0.00065120833,0.0012112557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038689992,0.00031844998,0.967312,0.00012705896,0.00022774037,0.000028680419,0.026796373,0.0001381113,0.00094514625,0.0033311148,0.000055717126,0.0003327339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025611758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009453166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073805794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000134083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011744057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092314123","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2020.1822175","title":"Neuropsychological validation of a brief quiz to examine comprehension of consent information in observational studies of substance users","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Comprehension; Psychology; Cognition; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Logistic regression; Receiver operating characteristic; Informed consent; Neuropsychology; Test (biology); Proxy (statistics); Cognitive impairment; Clinical psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Psychiatry; Machine learning","score_opus":0.5550257426068418,"score_gpt":0.5161979715579029,"score_spread":0.038827771048938864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092314123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99467117,0.00007072997,0.00033227634,0.0040703397,0.00033019076,0.000395053,0.00005939305,0.000015525593,0.000055338325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977066,0.00004525717,0.0010157429,0.0011453396,0.00001712103,0.000022690481,0.000032408883,0.0000066362754,0.000008240165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979138,0.0004064944,0.000906634,0.00018306154,0.00045593228,0.00013409712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973224,0.0014367752,0.0003550167,0.00020661285,0.0006080789,0.00007111448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007972869,0.00010047307,0.00032801993,0.00012136894,0.000027648897,0.000003493617,0.00014352948,0.00020882908,0.00005216196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015394845,0.00009111363,0.0000496588,0.0004262752,0.00017453953,0.000076699296,0.00002911272,0.0004243242,0.000010296542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036892588,0.0023320478,0.40514785,0.0010744181,0.000121725716,0.000302976,0.40340132,0.0024170252,0.12711747,0.007881311,0.0019798302,0.044534776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006685516,0.00049732527,0.9929289,0.00021331894,0.000016330067,0.000008526892,0.0036266404,0.000016192802,0.0014170656,0.000075711934,0.0004474106,0.000084013016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013733511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000526871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5877811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002328886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008445149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37155062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323568189","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2023.2187804","title":"Grey zones and good practice: A European survey of academic integrity among undergraduate students","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Horizon 2020; European Commission","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Research integrity; Mathematics education; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.14553071609079649,"score_gpt":0.45814760995173953,"score_spread":0.31261689386094305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323568189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98497415,0.00012564068,0.00006321417,0.00937596,0.00054068177,0.00034850644,0.00007016883,0.00015299277,0.004348662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382573,0.0028424556,0.00015928099,0.000314375,0.000112965696,0.000013123053,0.0000369499,0.000023427456,0.0026717063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924255,0.0050849738,0.00043949523,0.0003444846,0.0012969635,0.00040860736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491704,0.0037915898,0.00030317873,0.00019159394,0.0006091467,0.00018747622],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028582184,0.00016182842,0.00024803166,0.00012776825,0.00062624685,0.00009505705,0.00067430997,0.0013245777,0.000026960915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016557144,0.00015863685,0.000053972784,0.00071306276,0.00094974734,0.0004964487,0.00029986174,0.009885268,0.00011160139],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022378366,0.00009361869,0.92991537,0.00001813121,0.00002635018,0.000037809226,0.049497016,5.2733174e-7,0.00011277578,0.01582922,0.001427652,0.0030191254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020684149,0.000043663902,0.98363936,0.0000973691,0.00009748358,0.0000026323205,0.009814885,0.00000455782,0.00005361438,0.001640551,0.004206319,0.00019275007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04655806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014729447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053723935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003688947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391607910","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2024.2306134","title":"Bibliometric review and mapping analysis of publication ethics research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Originality; Publishing; Misconduct; Bibliometrics; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Intellectual property; Research integrity; Social science; Library science; Sociology; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Engineering; Computer science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.40416994958953883,"score_gpt":0.552038113106941,"score_spread":0.14786816351740212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391607910","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090334274,0.30679205,0.0022534586,0.55094457,0.00091437704,0.0018052824,0.00021524934,0.00036237226,0.046378396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7195145,0.2715647,0.00081191806,0.0024258525,0.00017738415,0.00009321014,0.00006984704,0.000016022219,0.0053266133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957339,0.0018153081,0.00034320258,0.000283122,0.0015496478,0.0002748208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922266,0.0056816577,0.000072071336,0.00020099057,0.0017036614,0.00011504293],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.051398356,0.00007137932,0.00024281265,0.024101399,0.00060314726,0.00020095964,0.00033423267,0.001475656,0.00056336843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020423697,0.0000672694,0.0001015214,0.14601563,0.0006472983,0.00029789231,0.00008922047,0.008870618,0.00003681103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002468646,0.00010277493,0.017309483,0.0021306176,0.00034907716,0.000011976289,0.15011233,4.4220198e-7,0.0004795983,0.69034046,0.028484486,0.11067625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004848658,0.000034185192,0.04951664,0.0013689541,0.0028445877,0.0000019322679,0.0066009266,0.00010845839,0.000078136145,0.0042264215,0.9349028,0.00026847582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054015033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008491143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9064183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008959518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008511556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396856568","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2024.2347658","title":"Fraudulent participation in psychological research using virtual synchronous interviews: ethical challenges and potential solutions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster Children's Hospital; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.6571028878007732,"score_gpt":0.6432007040709535,"score_spread":0.013902183729819662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396856568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95868653,0.009447233,0.0069927024,0.022376163,0.00088373886,0.00040818716,0.000008455912,0.00008053862,0.001116444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444145,0.0022606107,0.0027080013,0.000106141946,0.00025121166,0.00011828571,0.0000023522618,0.000013906622,0.00009806783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98931134,0.008561015,0.0003378717,0.0004631288,0.00078877155,0.00053786015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736077,0.0021180338,0.000030171392,0.00014905061,0.000191727,0.00015025445],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02644902,0.00011306818,0.00018777006,0.00021209022,0.0006851833,0.0001640938,0.00016823428,0.0008240193,0.00017252087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021098698,0.00010178938,0.00006758974,0.00036271274,0.0014294063,0.00015784017,0.00014010673,0.0035911247,0.000027424747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016652528,0.00033326747,0.0000833083,0.000035005076,0.0000072734974,0.000103122584,0.25715485,0.000008950161,0.0009761865,0.4684533,0.000035108187,0.272793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020531903,0.0044545433,0.28518364,0.003259531,0.00044984787,0.000092608985,0.39255518,0.01177019,0.00030130544,0.24379058,0.053673316,0.00241606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010409411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002178308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28510034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021330423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017326212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406431030","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2024.2447955","title":"Ethics in Action: Personal Reflections of Canadian Psychologists","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Applied psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.3018000422771403,"score_gpt":0.5323434103995274,"score_spread":0.23054336812238707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406431030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8650999,0.0016800266,0.00018334952,0.058664113,0.006131458,0.00039559096,0.000048154947,0.00007214559,0.06772525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98801565,0.00088960526,0.0004629129,0.002438796,0.000063849235,0.00007311581,0.0000146889015,0.000014465458,0.008026932],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983506,0.00046362678,0.00032633328,0.00033059352,0.0002469231,0.00028192677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983806,0.00084451254,0.000072802824,0.0003586927,0.00025304692,0.000090330854],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020135443,0.00011941281,0.00016706192,0.0008910568,0.00026003964,0.000028112901,0.00019565699,0.000957272,0.0014027911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049766066,0.0001295322,0.00008063056,0.0011612417,0.00013845447,0.000084601284,0.000019950183,0.0036645427,0.000075391894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083007483,0.0037229348,0.14829402,0.00026049433,0.00022396924,0.0007493394,0.33820015,0.000038390353,0.013560608,0.13022025,0.03304036,0.33085942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008058036,0.00015589343,0.29493198,0.00014429016,0.000115871764,0.000048896134,0.007760611,0.000015364647,0.00011067639,0.00072796305,0.69492126,0.00026137923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3708252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7567818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6618809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001005076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082891254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410694487","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2025.2500356","title":"A qualitative evaluation of ETHICA-4P, a toolkit for ethical clinical decision-making and overcoming cultural barriers in psychotherapy in the United Kingdom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychotherapist; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.3553685669880825,"score_gpt":0.6327728980917181,"score_spread":0.2774043311036356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410694487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98317945,0.00066944247,0.002316401,0.0119300485,0.00066624425,0.001084324,0.000013962445,0.000013362441,0.00012674216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915006,0.00030002365,0.002818886,0.005007962,0.000038091894,0.0002949123,0.000010495493,0.000014841696,0.00001419461],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99114364,0.006379298,0.000997958,0.0004851886,0.0007358977,0.00025804134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96267337,0.036052078,0.00022126338,0.00039151724,0.00061974226,0.000042057327],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04444535,0.00016727601,0.00034746714,0.00032317633,0.00018471699,0.00007545435,0.0002995866,0.0012614283,0.0001197873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012215418,0.00012710897,0.00012863813,0.0007222837,0.00027662623,0.000115557654,0.00002636309,0.0038863043,0.0000015721071],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002905065,0.00055774953,0.020011412,0.000048054826,0.00006522997,0.000011007271,0.6886241,0.00006450436,0.00024070233,0.08059496,0.000529609,0.20634764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027290871,0.001560682,0.36940137,0.0043556103,0.0012447503,0.00002920849,0.33488694,0.016379016,0.000018769892,0.1968364,0.04681771,0.0011786865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094053627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35373715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005057396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003715351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411028296","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2025.2512069","title":"Bridging ethics and culture: a co-created, culturally sensitive informed consent framework for research in Bimoba and Mamprusi communities in Ghana","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Bridging (networking); Research ethics; Cultural sensitivity; Culturally sensitive; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Alternative medicine; Psychiatry; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.5439419092564145,"score_gpt":0.6475948913198467,"score_spread":0.10365298206343221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411028296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8587938,0.0018937065,0.0056182332,0.1233875,0.00024966683,0.0033473927,0.00017068213,0.0000877727,0.0064512743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94166785,0.012900254,0.041204873,0.0021023653,0.00007763204,0.00041410598,0.00004588547,0.000022892444,0.0015641566],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98421437,0.013108303,0.0004617019,0.00033289246,0.0010352464,0.0008474924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9309168,0.06729385,0.000084380736,0.0002277865,0.0012812776,0.00019590455],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.050468627,0.0001949679,0.00038150503,0.00050090905,0.0022149014,0.00041756494,0.0002768957,0.0012973738,0.000008818631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043122213,0.00018099618,0.00005325754,0.0010536711,0.0056618997,0.00026052017,0.0002487407,0.009680648,0.000001780695],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010228806,0.000063811036,0.00717292,0.00029951052,0.000013673934,0.00001987912,0.6200332,5.971046e-7,0.00011135855,0.36590433,0.00016389585,0.006114521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010001984,0.00015573428,0.009298929,0.0027955088,0.000026319978,0.000002998042,0.86716783,0.00007911062,0.0003497791,0.107470736,0.011305168,0.00034767366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041752957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20401569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2584336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038569403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032468257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411426071","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2025.2518270","title":"Bots, scammers, and fraudulent responders: a year of disrupted data collection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Data collection; Computer science; Internet privacy; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.1591134270294539,"score_gpt":0.45683318827258257,"score_spread":0.29771976124312866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411426071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98968214,0.0006033677,0.0003892698,0.006161778,0.00035754306,0.00074166514,0.00012328816,0.00008085236,0.001860085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892448,0.0004135755,0.0024365,0.00053252367,0.000050780774,0.000031425072,0.00021021884,0.00002806703,0.0070521133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854946,0.00014786409,0.00031288614,0.00038978222,0.00040861755,0.00019141175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984345,0.00032175868,0.000085555286,0.0008701686,0.00018349422,0.00010452101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094232394,0.00013422257,0.00028329485,0.00023603652,0.00011581567,0.00001947131,0.0001840724,0.00032711503,0.000085556814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011387686,0.00012904423,0.00003302297,0.0005140648,0.00021161893,0.00009289044,0.00024084112,0.000873697,0.000015680467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038543881,0.0036580008,0.5825447,0.0015447321,0.0005154806,0.00032746675,0.061259586,0.000002418123,0.112310894,0.0062922644,0.10882529,0.11886479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00805059,0.0011425263,0.8569016,0.0016105834,0.0029084578,0.000060553586,0.0542759,0.0005450686,0.016439743,0.00036152938,0.057079647,0.00062383676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004058349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026880283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27435687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007620027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050435925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5262271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}