{"meta":{"query_hash":"e24898964be8","filters":{"venue":"Ethics & Behavior"},"cohort_total":32,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":32,"exported":32,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e24898964be8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Ethics+%26+Behavior"},"results":[{"id":"W1742562591","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2011.570168","title":"Ethical Elder Care for Families","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Elder care; Psychology; Nursing; Medicine","score_opus":0.214425687137705,"score_gpt":0.4891901297156915,"score_spread":0.2747644425779865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1742562591","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08575101,0.0113537535,0.0046646046,0.5586961,0.006351289,0.00010282403,0.00003893685,0.00004888486,0.33299267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8284918,0.00474882,0.0026524086,0.08670706,0.002254114,0.00014735076,0.000035140278,0.000050737257,0.07491254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849069,0.01027281,0.0004625042,0.0004623212,0.0015826122,0.0023128795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718839,0.010058685,0.0025275534,0.0019337204,0.0046220487,0.008974164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01911555,0.0005361749,0.00050401373,0.0007300667,0.018523049,0.0072843144,0.0010374517,0.007522601,0.010638795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043065354,0.00028439835,0.0005290129,0.00058134756,0.015727518,0.005386887,0.008330482,0.0094779385,0.0010369912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005005712,0.00028859434,0.011613547,0.00015951294,0.00003991807,0.0020916136,0.14184265,0.00030127444,0.00025922217,0.5167873,0.2539876,0.07257864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003688256,0.000101274476,0.0062360326,0.0012843205,0.000030170959,0.002601692,0.120237015,0.00024716754,0.0002567948,0.2501144,0.6188071,0.000047261186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005402217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01736501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01911555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006449275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025983158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10109389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971296458","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1301_11","title":"The Ethical Ideologies of Psychologists and Physicians: A Preliminary Comparison","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Ideology; Ethical code; Psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Professional ethics; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.23590846624766024,"score_gpt":0.5820438396315746,"score_spread":0.3461353733839143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971296458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934395,0.00033054757,0.00022404394,0.00047571302,0.000027951315,0.000029316816,0.000031327403,0.0000014452925,0.0054401685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987685,0.00023506238,0.00023445833,0.00023918615,0.000022163093,0.000031869742,0.00004028037,0.0000026585221,0.00042575845],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926789,0.003987324,0.00041601423,0.0002446536,0.0018371993,0.0008358738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975355,0.012503719,0.003974392,0.0003664726,0.0044190264,0.0033813901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067443666,0.000106232874,0.000302728,0.003098589,0.0012679622,0.0029115055,0.0002807509,0.00067216606,0.0020684435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038958643,0.00021405525,0.00024932856,0.0012275471,0.0021302334,0.0014410479,0.0026960915,0.0011751832,0.00025386142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013142981,0.00046197997,0.6957635,0.00019794084,0.00010775105,0.00077594956,0.24506193,0.00013005243,0.002363088,0.0075240764,0.0012335465,0.045065887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001202827,0.0007303544,0.7366492,0.00019198695,0.00003348818,0.0010094013,0.24750568,0.00039235977,0.00043744248,0.0035197933,0.0093715135,0.000038509832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014793074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032755362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067443666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011681576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013362856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035668075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984687891","doi":"10.1080/10508420802623682","title":"Believers and Skeptics: Where Social Worker Situate Themselves Regarding the Code of Ethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Ethical code; Variety (cybernetics); Engineering ethics; EXPOSE; Code (set theory); Code of conduct; Sociology; Faith; Meta-ethics; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Law; Nursing ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Set (abstract data type); Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.1265037699525921,"score_gpt":0.44622810042307265,"score_spread":0.31972433047048054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984687891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97974956,0.0005421829,0.0039395723,0.0069561554,0.00009469035,0.00007457643,0.00001302229,0.000030005544,0.008600193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720216,0.00013671599,0.0006403653,0.0006642506,0.000027325732,0.000026573683,0.000009137318,0.000013386015,0.0012800377],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9666703,0.025515512,0.0007748469,0.0014180343,0.0032270034,0.002394433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9505428,0.036776144,0.0059157526,0.0012521708,0.0030252538,0.0024877999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0203427,0.00065787364,0.0008171561,0.0023517357,0.01736017,0.009625204,0.0017959217,0.004308205,0.0017438718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0461793,0.0007609849,0.0005467484,0.0010019754,0.027124168,0.006535617,0.009011431,0.0074117687,0.0003069057],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001997955,0.000010644568,0.0018097284,0.000021373731,0.0000039391025,0.000373809,0.9940019,0.000011133496,0.0005884844,0.0012281139,0.0001845532,0.0017463077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032677603,0.000028687253,0.0012448466,0.00007988077,0.0000050541257,0.000271268,0.991835,0.00008548144,0.0002393359,0.0013547624,0.004833333,0.000019031553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012675729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017151926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0203427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053370204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006366812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1075837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990651003","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1301_10","title":"Voluntary Assent in Biomedical Research With Adolescents: A Comparison of Parent and Adolescent Views","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institutes of Health; University of Warwick","keywords":"Vignette; Autonomy; Psychology; Informed consent; Turnover; Perception; Social psychology; Asthma; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.751738866568881,"score_gpt":0.6569981701594663,"score_spread":0.09474069640941474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990651003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99582076,0.00078088755,0.00033458046,0.00081591774,0.000021919837,0.000022965354,0.000027623364,0.0000023360521,0.002173034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833256,0.0007721592,0.00021513058,0.00034749915,0.000015500042,0.000035744477,0.000033164717,0.000003017982,0.00024532323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99114496,0.006210875,0.0005865194,0.00019665754,0.0014802595,0.00038080142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675359,0.019355625,0.008047894,0.00066123356,0.0027018017,0.0016974652],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013089184,0.000104395054,0.0002539648,0.0010031846,0.0008501508,0.001920493,0.00022342999,0.0006726595,0.001441562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038725562,0.00018371012,0.0004028132,0.00052524806,0.0012597656,0.000866113,0.001084403,0.0010979192,0.0002203961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000595353,0.00018561081,0.73260456,0.00025034611,0.0001015103,0.002017527,0.18732393,0.00007626167,0.0038438367,0.00423703,0.0021478164,0.06661625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007158399,0.0010231404,0.6676539,0.001178624,0.00019227961,0.008740591,0.28047255,0.00069093006,0.004743872,0.0015295382,0.033631105,0.00007181888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018371624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028253964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99932736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007746613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001142757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06922305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996875105","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2013.869747","title":"Cognitive Enhancement and Academic Misconduct: A Study Exploring Their Frequency and Relationship","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Cheating; Psychology; Cognition; Scientific misconduct; German; Academic integrity; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Medical education; Law; Social psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; History; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.33474939909622264,"score_gpt":0.42572240834233166,"score_spread":0.09097300924610902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996875105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957865,0.0006347523,0.00013035611,0.00033308714,0.0000079083175,0.000065485125,0.000042930096,0.000003265219,0.0029956666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882716,0.00040560847,0.00015560482,0.00009172475,0.0000140537095,0.00005984917,0.000031988762,0.0000024314572,0.0004116342],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99032545,0.00554013,0.0008808005,0.000446465,0.0022376818,0.0005695842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85428536,0.08370358,0.039327543,0.0062564295,0.00929044,0.007136612],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010760568,0.00027368983,0.0005353548,0.003100158,0.001978209,0.0023326166,0.0010507071,0.0012922062,0.002945076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08700103,0.0003703933,0.00055582286,0.0020467648,0.0020264902,0.0025829119,0.0025697788,0.002770814,0.0003794873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048808256,0.003777212,0.9213493,0.00022337289,0.00017319985,0.00038431693,0.034278106,0.0000648192,0.000284743,0.0009272055,0.00034984396,0.037699796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043285334,0.0009912937,0.9680836,0.00017794812,0.00011167359,0.0013272379,0.02546483,0.00024063203,0.00029517405,0.0010456902,0.0021777612,0.000040918505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002250001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003038413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013745845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018746877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05690795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001126839","doi":"10.1080/10508420903035455","title":"A Second Look at Debriefing Practices: Madness in Our Method?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Regina","funders":"American Psychological Association","keywords":"Debriefing; Popularity; Psychology; Personality; Function (biology); Applied psychology; Trustworthiness; Medical education; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Medicine","score_opus":0.15553021567146233,"score_gpt":0.5011636353466175,"score_spread":0.34563341967515515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001126839","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029005358,0.008325431,0.83725923,0.08114491,0.01551762,0.0049536466,0.00021119307,0.0012670641,0.0223156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17525886,0.0040857173,0.72752976,0.04923203,0.0032598046,0.026625205,0.00014406927,0.0013846838,0.012479858],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5689008,0.3828416,0.016704991,0.008482544,0.02064967,0.00242036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5413441,0.31524497,0.025217861,0.0602567,0.05143589,0.0065004537],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30730343,0.002145442,0.002310924,0.0053997813,0.008966596,0.012328079,0.0046863575,0.0041702287,0.013719127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48152453,0.0015847574,0.0017523068,0.0035897407,0.017934611,0.01713531,0.012970954,0.012574429,0.0037768483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080806756,0.0006627462,0.007319883,0.0052307104,0.00024452904,0.00045634925,0.35580182,0.00018030872,0.005442861,0.13527836,0.041460868,0.44711342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063647004,0.0015822056,0.011900782,0.02359156,0.00040549124,0.0034286163,0.20634587,0.0048764287,0.011965821,0.18773389,0.54667455,0.00085833407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031144517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007763816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99582976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054275664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009191631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8542182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006269789","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1202_4","title":"On Boredom and Experimentation in Humans","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Boredom; Debriefing; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Informed consent; Ethical issues; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.1883832211984424,"score_gpt":0.3834059668395874,"score_spread":0.195022745641145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006269789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14665483,0.24298058,0.18688244,0.13610631,0.0060239355,0.00042273902,0.00011834122,0.00033040126,0.28048044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7690678,0.13526104,0.0371548,0.040779617,0.0044482383,0.001337953,0.000077889716,0.00014437207,0.011728213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96692467,0.027987361,0.00077689125,0.0010683935,0.0027606706,0.0004820702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9058371,0.08366919,0.00433968,0.0039970777,0.0012225003,0.0009343966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025193784,0.0006710671,0.0006878298,0.001222309,0.0026923467,0.003298479,0.0009300369,0.004123704,0.002572589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042569716,0.00035436254,0.00047516945,0.0006731049,0.03611471,0.004444521,0.005682538,0.004001933,0.0006149485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003920085,0.00026636105,0.0063638873,0.0023087608,0.00013822346,0.0028098277,0.09905904,0.0015743864,0.0058266195,0.55881435,0.016030127,0.30641642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077274635,0.0014510746,0.01098425,0.0054556457,0.00007940041,0.008692821,0.023842473,0.0010129887,0.0033613758,0.58822,0.35661325,0.00020945912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004490831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073030783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025193784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011832876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013119039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13323903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020903994","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1604_7","title":"The Research Ethics Review Process and Ethics Review Narratives","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Research ethics; Sociology; Narrative review; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7844652283520209,"score_gpt":0.7154801608445555,"score_spread":0.06898506750746547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020903994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28821376,0.011211757,0.27398765,0.2847732,0.0049195196,0.013176851,0.0007649842,0.00049258553,0.12245973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8560735,0.004309228,0.10548517,0.008959559,0.0007360305,0.008991521,0.00019459265,0.00023644045,0.015013984],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.38451883,0.5535423,0.026626809,0.005748775,0.025985833,0.0035774086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26776186,0.60185075,0.043141305,0.022209257,0.052179154,0.01285767],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.31362933,0.00068933784,0.00093576335,0.0047530606,0.011492067,0.016164275,0.0028922793,0.0054288483,0.0033922652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.54031205,0.0015345592,0.0009846142,0.0038230505,0.020245722,0.013126126,0.01367682,0.008192318,0.0015206814],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020478817,0.00007423404,0.0028352619,0.001097522,0.000043356158,0.0017729828,0.7878546,0.0005965564,0.0021465414,0.15072387,0.011429665,0.04122065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014262178,0.0001698031,0.0028482385,0.0057197516,0.000046298184,0.0020685187,0.37344816,0.0027231905,0.004229068,0.10742509,0.500854,0.00032526584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025374324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022280982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99457115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013373192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034982786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84641725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025563565","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1503_1","title":"To Stay or To Go, To Speak or Stay Silent, To Act or Not To Act: Moral Distress as Experienced by Psychologists","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Psychology; Distress; Context (archaeology); Moral disengagement; Social psychology; Moral injury; Mental health; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.31491427233811625,"score_gpt":0.6148544175381077,"score_spread":0.2999401451999914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025563565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932346,0.00065349205,0.0003368054,0.003022078,0.000049738625,0.000024377005,0.0000091097245,0.0000066489265,0.0026631407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984713,0.00028908392,0.00013637386,0.00061067514,0.000011267819,0.000013809743,0.0000047208196,0.000004054377,0.0004587714],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866666,0.009619821,0.00025881705,0.0003345463,0.0012363278,0.0018839733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880993,0.0054896595,0.0021444762,0.00032870081,0.0011948323,0.0027430542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007648414,0.00048096405,0.0006761943,0.0010044847,0.015640287,0.0067923153,0.0013549526,0.0033000016,0.00094893813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021277666,0.00058320817,0.0003483192,0.001075865,0.022641115,0.0028587761,0.0076350416,0.006357426,0.00019028065],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000481018,0.000050104703,0.007929512,0.000035321274,0.0000056801814,0.0007941253,0.98639315,0.000033760254,0.00030799553,0.00091123965,0.00057581544,0.0029151952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048027064,0.00005190387,0.0063125906,0.00004488899,0.0000045324778,0.00045624666,0.9903002,0.000046354573,0.000075180295,0.00037782677,0.0023073535,0.000018117205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05055951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08809742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05055951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01093132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010587533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100530446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039778749","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1203_3","title":"Applied Ethics in Mental Health in Cuba: Part II-Power Differentials, Dilemmas, Resources, and Limitations","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical code; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Nursing ethics; Ethical dilemma; Criticism; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Mental health; Applied ethics; Professional conduct; Action (physics); Professional ethics; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.17820550185771147,"score_gpt":0.3965893256575285,"score_spread":0.21838382379981705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039778749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8745676,0.01232315,0.0026483915,0.060217034,0.00022996559,0.00022397169,0.000042920863,0.000010442489,0.04973647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99130857,0.0026341046,0.0010329748,0.0015655127,0.000036558453,0.00017073948,0.00001603783,0.000005173188,0.0032303426],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850043,0.011736971,0.00037179518,0.0002699996,0.0008748706,0.0017420296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858417,0.009242398,0.001835889,0.00043525998,0.0013448704,0.001299818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010497642,0.0002823946,0.00045835023,0.002095488,0.012588611,0.008750313,0.00096640753,0.0013783685,0.0017928607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01694731,0.00037691605,0.0002140122,0.0019159429,0.011683464,0.0039048214,0.009454519,0.0019183718,0.000092650385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014275653,0.00018986079,0.06892387,0.00087089563,0.00003640026,0.0027975428,0.68606746,0.0004660993,0.00097308285,0.10962738,0.0057642674,0.12414036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017436672,0.000042202642,0.042683117,0.0010602437,0.000015416952,0.0008755887,0.8837325,0.00040098687,0.00035449403,0.021632168,0.049141087,0.00004475506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08378584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15237331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08378584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018376686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019664772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1665963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061925875","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1602_1","title":"A Re-Visioning of Boundaries in Professional Helping Relationships: Exploring Other Metaphors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Bridge (graph theory); Boundary (topology); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Professional boundaries; Ethical issues; Epistemology; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2411299620485944,"score_gpt":0.4291522961316174,"score_spread":0.18802233408302296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061925875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19607157,0.008896381,0.28480276,0.0869175,0.001975557,0.00023708201,0.00007885365,0.00023506746,0.42078516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756717,0.00088191783,0.01768353,0.0013855331,0.00008807172,0.00010972552,0.000013644672,0.000056660978,0.004109219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826774,0.015093001,0.0001796117,0.00035499517,0.0011729329,0.00052210304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990126,0.0064104563,0.000854888,0.0006416899,0.0010226221,0.0009443401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008604929,0.000616934,0.0006398948,0.0028945135,0.007028801,0.007971926,0.0020024565,0.0047497936,0.0046190596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144257005,0.0003809849,0.00079033506,0.0013875067,0.0382196,0.014770031,0.008119722,0.0064719557,0.00043648624],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019361814,0.000022062513,0.00021287083,0.00009502322,0.0000042639404,0.00035078882,0.09538904,0.0003172353,0.00024003681,0.8976,0.0016834765,0.0040659457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043396016,0.00007168262,0.0006215152,0.0006242388,0.0000138249425,0.0019912866,0.19249295,0.004163547,0.00043938993,0.6696764,0.12980352,0.000058117766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002554623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023719356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008604929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044894502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029568805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04550773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069671793","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1302_05","title":"Dual Relationship Activities: Principal Component Analysis of Counselors' Attitudes","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Principal component analysis; Typology; Deliverable; Psychology; Dual (grammatical number); Exploratory factor analysis; Variance (accounting); Social psychology; Dual purpose; Survey instrument; Statistics; Applied psychology; Mathematics; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Accounting","score_opus":0.13685579921796773,"score_gpt":0.42952336060121915,"score_spread":0.29266756138325145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069671793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99818677,0.000023321876,0.0006899002,0.000051583836,0.0000026396206,0.00006451652,0.000042734984,0.000009052627,0.0009295098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979468,0.000044739045,0.0013044557,0.000014443022,0.000004645876,0.00008558795,0.0001163925,0.000003285195,0.00047968453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983455,0.0006866328,0.00008799978,0.00009443799,0.0006243569,0.00016115635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953557,0.0019492863,0.00083016534,0.0002601151,0.0010638988,0.0005409454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029785961,0.00024479697,0.00024856828,0.0013844604,0.00061735976,0.000954152,0.0002109098,0.00021394588,0.001586768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007994228,0.00015572466,0.00025319163,0.001165802,0.00039866564,0.00030506146,0.0006732108,0.0005608551,0.00020588665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015913723,0.00033465997,0.91360354,0.000034630502,0.00006128965,0.00004419254,0.015498217,0.00018288952,0.0015258252,0.0002754445,0.0006750522,0.06760512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008143325,0.00015043872,0.9900511,0.000016057633,0.00001685958,0.00006756611,0.006545663,0.0017817084,0.00030934592,0.00017446738,0.00086867,0.000009983694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009453849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013321756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009453849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005861972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012661151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018797696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070221634","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2013.865525","title":"The Judas Within: A Look at the Sexual Abuse Crisis in the Catholic Church","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"John Jay College of Criminal Justice","keywords":"Sexual abuse; Criminology; Psychology; Theology; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine; Medical emergency; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.08772144611088523,"score_gpt":0.38744481117542645,"score_spread":0.2997233650645412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070221634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56079257,0.019091917,0.0007377593,0.34085363,0.0015511407,0.000077632176,0.000038997736,0.000016266664,0.076840036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587579,0.0075739645,0.00033352134,0.0238606,0.00065762707,0.00003793137,0.000020807405,0.000023480761,0.008734194],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968923,0.0022018095,0.0000378545,0.000059366022,0.00018039234,0.000628275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967596,0.0013869597,0.00039467873,0.00007110731,0.00037725086,0.001010374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034164267,0.0002906559,0.00038078465,0.0018039752,0.01640491,0.0059474343,0.0014039001,0.004921261,0.0025750776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004923945,0.00035767222,0.00040120137,0.0017215164,0.015556034,0.004973231,0.004804385,0.009076884,0.00017691728],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008233228,0.000302951,0.017128056,0.0003706209,0.000026630272,0.008565413,0.7170687,0.000421458,0.0004672103,0.20009972,0.036324836,0.019142099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008772405,0.00006800329,0.017015085,0.00042238602,0.000009718978,0.0007912875,0.8944203,0.00038468034,0.000075717,0.011705915,0.07507209,0.000026033033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059585232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13650925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059585232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010402029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008069839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11847681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075988183","doi":"10.1080/10508420802063863","title":"Empirical Research on Ethical Issues in Pediatric Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Empirical research; Variety (cybernetics); Nothing; Food and drug administration; Ethical issues; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.641743448509592,"score_gpt":0.6522462024212058,"score_spread":0.010502753911613816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075988183","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18959096,0.04112874,0.09696217,0.34963867,0.0019694632,0.002115814,0.00048158897,0.00008070818,0.31803182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465188,0.0107926065,0.018923866,0.019263308,0.0005920033,0.0014270323,0.00014856104,0.000047797126,0.0022860381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.5632644,0.40209466,0.007851013,0.004969823,0.018749367,0.003070677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.14975101,0.7684398,0.042247966,0.012198552,0.024047693,0.0033150087],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2557526,0.0006061918,0.0008684439,0.005296923,0.0077042524,0.010981638,0.0025718086,0.0048351977,0.009680441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5384112,0.000661132,0.00050865684,0.00577909,0.037451025,0.015632888,0.0066201543,0.009764972,0.00071149034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006216196,0.00030869272,0.022984456,0.0015962177,0.00009264314,0.0005016841,0.04605157,0.0011187325,0.00016137985,0.87764496,0.012605838,0.036871675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012563425,0.00021958174,0.016419455,0.018885005,0.000095628086,0.0008052466,0.10419624,0.00361328,0.0011734453,0.7081764,0.14620958,0.0000806216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025637187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002298801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010045557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017510165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9177896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079178579","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2014.950270","title":"Structural and Interpersonal Benefits and Risks of Participation in HIV Research: Perspectives of Female Sex Workers in Guatemala","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Sex work; Interpersonal communication; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Population; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Environmental health; Family medicine; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.2737290850287933,"score_gpt":0.5003943284700195,"score_spread":0.22666524344122624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079178579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99435586,0.00043973813,0.000042390693,0.0033478905,0.0000071715854,0.000013135318,0.000015430438,0.0000013381474,0.0017769713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986331,0.0003970638,0.000057345624,0.00047525554,0.00000896802,0.00001565801,0.000005886197,0.0000010395702,0.0004057676],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965215,0.002427681,0.00006502682,0.000081467064,0.00020198626,0.00070249394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967145,0.0014459054,0.00072644744,0.00007900903,0.00020490352,0.000829224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029836968,0.0002745447,0.00029349845,0.000842123,0.0110238865,0.0028670891,0.00045043835,0.0010887609,0.0027321724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036546877,0.00031140159,0.000267324,0.0005956957,0.0038020788,0.0011818863,0.0035052602,0.0014227728,0.00016923832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008814444,0.00013361033,0.16334161,0.0001452763,0.000025141511,0.0017339282,0.8174311,0.00003327671,0.0013731946,0.0009992938,0.00061245554,0.014082971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056297927,0.0001320624,0.09900192,0.0001255998,0.000012602869,0.00045344591,0.8953491,0.000051397124,0.00010114322,0.00025178978,0.0045034755,0.000011793919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034218486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.083026946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034218486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025498765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032520278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06803864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081971933","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1304_2","title":"Animal Ethical Evaluation: An Observational Study of Canadian IACUCs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research; Medical Research Council Canada","keywords":"Observational study; Protocol (science); Psychology; Animal testing; Observational methods in psychology; Animal welfare; Psychological intervention; Ethical issues; Research ethics; Observer (physics); Relation (database); Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Biology","score_opus":0.822465978733046,"score_gpt":0.5727639251869654,"score_spread":0.24970205354608066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081971933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99455345,0.00030760394,0.0002601068,0.00047589457,0.000018349689,0.000336997,0.00036226082,0.000013492741,0.003671781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952152,0.0009264568,0.0010000467,0.0003224764,0.000014202431,0.00025157802,0.0003474677,0.000018645294,0.0019039224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.991653,0.0018147788,0.00039360826,0.00069927966,0.003825183,0.00161407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97654724,0.003476249,0.0052595427,0.0009503446,0.01054942,0.0032172317],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083672125,0.0005659919,0.0006691967,0.005079538,0.010290477,0.0021007094,0.0020362544,0.00093020033,0.0023730814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029793823,0.000661968,0.0003708908,0.004847298,0.0036662836,0.00073351094,0.0027447937,0.001836838,0.00030183056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003363911,0.0008989239,0.81250185,0.0003807231,0.000062512576,0.0019443347,0.14205919,0.00015609906,0.0018946774,0.0011212983,0.0074662487,0.031177744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017079683,0.00043635946,0.86077666,0.00019423092,0.000022637912,0.0006083105,0.11830725,0.0003794452,0.00034700625,0.0001678244,0.018639168,0.000103963815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93232965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9742088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039066415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048679993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28344804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093840756","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2012.748634","title":"What Would I Do? Civilians' Ethical Decision Making in Response to Military Dilemmas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Moral dilemma; Psychology; Social psychology; Social dilemma; Dimension (graph theory); Ethical decision; Dilemma; Moral reasoning; Ethical dilemma; Moral disengagement; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.20171761796542453,"score_gpt":0.4172194608172201,"score_spread":0.21550184285179558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093840756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991269,0.00018372557,0.00072542904,0.0015424859,0.0000299705,0.0000089164005,0.0000043251976,0.000004507215,0.006231449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998708,0.00010990869,0.00058333995,0.0002621356,0.000010353229,0.0000045669153,0.0000048004854,0.000002419353,0.0003144428],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964108,0.0027985645,0.00007179463,0.00014236761,0.0003500081,0.0002265428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99092335,0.005123056,0.0023758195,0.000199001,0.0005812149,0.0007976797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004872843,0.00019198352,0.00021569386,0.00045436248,0.00091257587,0.0022949479,0.00025619223,0.00091453915,0.0011570585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037980966,0.00016747779,0.00015442757,0.00021150487,0.0023785897,0.0012215921,0.00077369454,0.0015931664,0.00019841638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015786659,0.001231585,0.41740748,0.00037179992,0.00028073174,0.0022064736,0.3616733,0.0041215164,0.026489466,0.033866547,0.0071559157,0.14361654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022766105,0.00093538983,0.44497702,0.00051487837,0.00013908667,0.0035576369,0.38794893,0.017635027,0.00783443,0.109561324,0.026380762,0.00028789553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011917214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023489525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004872843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005578716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007480465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025770366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116064712","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1002_03","title":"Value-Based Leadership in Organizations: Balancing Values, Interests, and Power Among Citizens, Workers, and Leaders","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Value (mathematics); Power (physics); Public relations; Promotion (chess); Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2070177051205732,"score_gpt":0.4306549328162699,"score_spread":0.2236372276956967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116064712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16666645,0.011644042,0.16650829,0.124234624,0.0011868356,0.00040931653,0.00005745002,0.00022364981,0.5290693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644363,0.002753738,0.019553874,0.0033334836,0.00027461443,0.00019633092,0.000031392126,0.000030271338,0.009389991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919491,0.00536585,0.0001523948,0.00038053058,0.0012626187,0.00088940834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956468,0.0014574642,0.0006500324,0.00020313611,0.0005553758,0.0014871275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059453375,0.0005169789,0.00034676812,0.0017084285,0.0060832594,0.013368179,0.0010889953,0.002639351,0.0023911404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004713052,0.00029011467,0.000384933,0.0016220525,0.022108816,0.007026239,0.0053554974,0.0028537645,0.0006619286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003144721,0.00013035686,0.0034822468,0.00016194685,0.000016016676,0.00028403723,0.03573279,0.00070861226,0.00045221945,0.9180977,0.005761164,0.03514149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004763233,0.00020792113,0.0033850924,0.0005557685,0.000017716835,0.00048078605,0.041808024,0.0030618368,0.00048006032,0.81326175,0.1366341,0.00005926447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041299476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013368179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063737724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011391125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046245217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146163237","doi":"10.1207/s15327019eb1501_3","title":"How Informed Is Online Informed Consent?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Presentation (obstetrics); Recall; Reading (process); Computer science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Political science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.34050175538961064,"score_gpt":0.5363866975708118,"score_spread":0.19588494218120117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146163237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14388569,0.024609158,0.16208418,0.54368246,0.005040901,0.003011623,0.0005292564,0.0003022672,0.11685447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89602876,0.012592414,0.05301383,0.030809687,0.0013700612,0.002247917,0.0002350784,0.00018222103,0.003519999],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.4013652,0.54866123,0.020218335,0.005492904,0.020830212,0.0034320913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27182767,0.62980646,0.03568157,0.03277396,0.025522621,0.0043875985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3376509,0.00073785,0.0012114495,0.0030966452,0.004564729,0.01380656,0.0026870205,0.0071362015,0.0058480753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6252727,0.00083617435,0.0009349483,0.0035705888,0.02997655,0.03299121,0.0058902446,0.0060617635,0.0014532537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048588586,0.0004671422,0.019871965,0.003681782,0.00031382625,0.0015261268,0.24501884,0.0009694336,0.001808291,0.27916196,0.018669236,0.42802557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017571851,0.0004203606,0.009339004,0.00829007,0.0002050179,0.00255603,0.15798484,0.0018477787,0.004128647,0.6193512,0.19534902,0.00035235134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029849682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002098206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6623491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050466205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014700181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8167944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790852260","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1447383","title":"Can Norman Daniels Help You Get a Wheelchair? A Commentary on Durocher et al.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bruyère; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Wheelchair; Equity (law); Distributive justice; Assistive technology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Health care; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Health equity; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Internet privacy; Computer science; Political science; Law; Human–computer interaction; Engineering","score_opus":0.15806946166175265,"score_gpt":0.5003347327486768,"score_spread":0.34226527108692417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790852260","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013703784,0.003056512,0.000041559917,0.98536325,0.010113049,0.000002891625,0.000021647473,0.0000057100783,0.001258323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028624265,0.0011940388,0.000053925047,0.98816377,0.0052036154,0.000021299404,0.0000071316585,0.000016079273,0.0024778156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827787,0.0075431196,0.0011613255,0.002552516,0.0040312232,0.0019330439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94519836,0.04035684,0.0016091056,0.00081724377,0.007807175,0.004211358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014970264,0.00104718,0.0018075592,0.001051024,0.015622545,0.0070369965,0.0073838164,0.06225678,0.007470049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076336406,0.0009738661,0.0016292087,0.0014650961,0.01793373,0.0122459745,0.0048938906,0.07161126,0.003438586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001611695,0.000005373866,0.00005697462,0.00009933111,0.0000046365003,0.000119686905,0.0014827984,0.0000181764,0.000021061782,0.008184614,0.9876786,0.0023126262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028992232,0.000014661657,0.00035619404,0.0011996732,0.0000151479435,0.0003759566,0.00513946,0.000071211565,0.000114984185,0.009825759,0.9827901,0.00006791148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107381955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13360402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107381955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015737915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027398452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21351379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800434608","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1466301","title":"A Wake-Up Call? Issues With Plagiarism in Transnational Higher Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Collusion; Work (physics); Plagiarism detection; Higher education; Academic integrity; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Business; Engineering; Medicine; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.06700317219200898,"score_gpt":0.4109973970169084,"score_spread":0.34399422482489944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800434608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789508,0.000699823,0.0016312568,0.00979185,0.000052449646,0.000048628513,0.000015440033,0.000040496023,0.008769205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969119,0.000296406,0.00038108986,0.0008555543,0.000030738844,0.00002016918,0.000006753149,0.0000097585935,0.0014875226],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9489867,0.04010958,0.0026249315,0.0009862898,0.005428191,0.0018642813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8766219,0.07401687,0.026304422,0.006559942,0.008990755,0.0075060846],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027963227,0.00033649712,0.0005346804,0.0019055234,0.01126174,0.006829053,0.0012805382,0.0032020207,0.0037491801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089813225,0.000431175,0.00032994378,0.0022741193,0.008499738,0.0063426713,0.006370971,0.0037859702,0.00068130513],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009667396,0.00008952526,0.053303193,0.00024149031,0.000030401248,0.0013224019,0.89414614,0.00011272889,0.001949375,0.0047197696,0.002045149,0.041943144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007504794,0.0001698336,0.036738135,0.00031231967,0.000017846178,0.0015883402,0.9351568,0.00040579843,0.0013145338,0.0033200234,0.020896655,0.00007214101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004228362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069335937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044858176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049521853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14788544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898159239","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1526087","title":"How Can Ethics Support Innovative Health Care for an Aging Population?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"AGE-WELL; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Autonomy; Population ageing; Bioethics; Dementia; Health care; Agency (philosophy); Population; Face (sociological concept); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Law; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.3627123737524311,"score_gpt":0.6071143627369627,"score_spread":0.24440198898453164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898159239","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009916359,0.0073930714,0.014891975,0.89127904,0.0023900783,0.00007785833,0.000018181074,0.00004218382,0.073991336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77180797,0.012121127,0.017935472,0.1796623,0.0057163504,0.00040082334,0.000048514128,0.00011923274,0.012188241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9470571,0.043316104,0.00093561556,0.0016122131,0.0042153923,0.0028635391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90949774,0.057855986,0.0067566917,0.0047803223,0.009057968,0.012051236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06677332,0.0007302538,0.0010164934,0.0021024572,0.011135021,0.016351743,0.0026029896,0.013742715,0.004294263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09916971,0.0004717325,0.00088613835,0.0010190648,0.08659762,0.019309124,0.011556335,0.013677927,0.0015322136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020211472,0.000081913,0.0011776173,0.00016590887,0.000023940836,0.00021857533,0.02609043,0.0003560372,0.000097097065,0.9231351,0.024692837,0.023940302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020047091,0.000029400706,0.0003820684,0.0005082912,0.00001005975,0.00015919357,0.01182747,0.0002934758,0.0000752003,0.89075315,0.09591526,0.000026418164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004154174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005508229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06677332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010554368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029297676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3531353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908879940","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1563866","title":"The End of Dependence? Ethical Issues in the Adoption of Assistive Technologies: An Introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Assistive technology; Sustainability; Reflection (computer programming); Point (geometry); Ethical issues; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.05538514951678071,"score_gpt":0.4194989172025427,"score_spread":0.364113767685762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908879940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008741923,0.18775721,0.011637831,0.5937723,0.14945807,0.00035146603,0.00037360864,0.00012265463,0.04778498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09683433,0.27779922,0.014968379,0.2824192,0.28855255,0.0012640072,0.00047231303,0.00042172484,0.03726829],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940708,0.0035499637,0.000539748,0.0003150659,0.0011815676,0.00034280767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9432481,0.049804132,0.0012898481,0.00045633593,0.0044725146,0.000729012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008181515,0.00094355084,0.00087501865,0.0028876404,0.003973249,0.0063766907,0.0014314279,0.008490359,0.0060950685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026496433,0.00044521905,0.0009312619,0.0021997718,0.007189566,0.010693697,0.0045526177,0.013284415,0.0013043358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008980884,0.00018848015,0.0011295121,0.0044676797,0.00004842805,0.001696196,0.055208404,0.00042746754,0.0011570521,0.15934348,0.6519897,0.124253854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008421382,0.00007667058,0.0010366176,0.0051670684,0.000013343553,0.0009729762,0.015901627,0.00024569893,0.00021345248,0.027037669,0.9492698,0.000056628578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001191768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015720378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008490359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026206705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027207355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0432685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990733516","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2019.1694024","title":"Examining the impact of ethical leadership and organizational justice on employees’ ethical behavior: Does person–organization fit play a role?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical leadership; Organizational justice; Economic Justice; Organizational culture; Business ethics; Psychology; Public relations; Organizational behavior; Organizational commitment; Organizational ethics; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.34697053580149584,"score_gpt":0.45459607426543114,"score_spread":0.1076255384639353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990733516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956203,0.0001666493,0.0006583843,0.0007042026,0.000011748508,0.000015634596,0.0000075962944,0.000002179081,0.002813377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994911,0.000054135147,0.00021077896,0.00009391112,0.0000048818974,0.000009751089,0.0000052413443,0.0000012813341,0.00012887044],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99085253,0.0063134525,0.00032054025,0.00041852563,0.0012629289,0.0008319976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.949979,0.031482384,0.009720415,0.0020982532,0.0025917187,0.0041282023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008535021,0.00024186059,0.0003222693,0.0009479581,0.0015741519,0.0025797433,0.00041788287,0.0006998612,0.0025157458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027834358,0.00019288462,0.00051849714,0.00070313667,0.0024277684,0.0017833164,0.002342545,0.0014633196,0.00014910383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007790837,0.00065354677,0.9574893,0.000056638317,0.00013195278,0.00014324898,0.013136135,0.00010993298,0.00033120898,0.0024726372,0.0002082349,0.025189387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009033898,0.0002839088,0.9717908,0.00010303541,0.00005288535,0.000109369874,0.023390757,0.00067268626,0.00033372935,0.0022410445,0.0009949142,0.000017876153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031016162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006863242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008535021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001059846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027245472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04513806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092314123","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2020.1822175","title":"Neuropsychological validation of a brief quiz to examine comprehension of consent information in observational studies of substance users","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Comprehension; Psychology; Cognition; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Logistic regression; Receiver operating characteristic; Informed consent; Neuropsychology; Test (biology); Proxy (statistics); Cognitive impairment; Clinical psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Psychiatry; Machine learning","score_opus":0.5550257426068418,"score_gpt":0.5161979715579029,"score_spread":0.038827771048938864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092314123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952655,0.00017799262,0.0017396547,0.000087873916,0.000029786543,0.00051579886,0.00033173073,0.0000313365,0.001820347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957942,0.000121658995,0.0025646498,0.00013450356,0.00002804665,0.0004319085,0.00040472252,0.000007900832,0.0005125182],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945522,0.0029372727,0.0008598159,0.000361407,0.0010192601,0.00027006638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.958575,0.019480843,0.01086388,0.002964809,0.0070033786,0.0011121467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014711947,0.000513172,0.00037306477,0.0017361573,0.0004841508,0.0008640589,0.0005306504,0.00080790994,0.0011369896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061982438,0.00027572934,0.0007163962,0.0005557532,0.00061604084,0.00092985615,0.0007493543,0.0006881252,0.00040630906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000707919,0.0007832602,0.9803892,0.00005638546,0.000098921344,0.00010238656,0.00079623045,0.00023298063,0.0011416961,0.00007645135,0.0003298394,0.015284819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006788233,0.0018492867,0.9939859,0.00003384402,0.000031984862,0.0003189122,0.00029818277,0.0013265015,0.001204665,0.00011335176,0.0007539447,0.00001562083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037393032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053890515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014711947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005170287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009584351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07780516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323568189","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2023.2187804","title":"Grey zones and good practice: A European survey of academic integrity among undergraduate students","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Horizon 2020; European Commission","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Research integrity; Mathematics education; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.14553071609079649,"score_gpt":0.45814760995173953,"score_spread":0.31261689386094305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323568189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989573,0.00009273985,0.00007952298,0.00016962814,0.0000026255461,0.0000144415235,0.000040974715,0.0000022998008,0.00064038386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995832,0.00007385372,0.00006948974,0.00007811921,0.0000023785815,0.0000091972715,0.00003184061,0.0000013796086,0.0001505902],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925344,0.0037628885,0.00105063,0.00048244707,0.0015404598,0.00062908593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9551721,0.01423365,0.018863987,0.0024552378,0.0044548567,0.004820152],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009726064,0.000209282,0.00047407864,0.002003606,0.000885853,0.0022543438,0.00062817393,0.0013342649,0.0016814877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034800187,0.000290261,0.00030798142,0.001897031,0.0018260126,0.0021388645,0.0024004949,0.0012723973,0.00036241417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000703687,0.00023051498,0.9661941,0.000057399036,0.00003113318,0.0001592313,0.022044508,0.00007704138,0.0003356994,0.0002467745,0.00045065867,0.010102568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061786805,0.00021114608,0.97193044,0.000055225126,0.000007885848,0.00031931917,0.025007507,0.0002785032,0.0002298869,0.00016923274,0.0017660103,0.000018600736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003193263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028622458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99866575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001014817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000985066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05143696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391607910","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2024.2306134","title":"Bibliometric review and mapping analysis of publication ethics research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Originality; Publishing; Misconduct; Bibliometrics; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Intellectual property; Research integrity; Social science; Library science; Sociology; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Engineering; Computer science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.40416994958953883,"score_gpt":0.552038113106941,"score_spread":0.14786816351740212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391607910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5192237,0.10420901,0.15257737,0.00745425,0.001722017,0.02475724,0.04893097,0.0020226622,0.13910282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8353684,0.022465285,0.11071297,0.0003108859,0.00053248095,0.015060961,0.0112419985,0.00024365599,0.0040634517],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.85823816,0.06355499,0.027658736,0.0064511625,0.042431828,0.0016650194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64329404,0.24929196,0.035301037,0.015163756,0.0554152,0.0015340872],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06307944,0.00097541866,0.0032510662,0.16796757,0.0029838374,0.006944384,0.0017341371,0.0010210255,0.006649763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29289612,0.0005226436,0.0031236766,0.19250536,0.0017999585,0.0043391422,0.0043574683,0.00069560925,0.0011736724],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037873595,0.00023988896,0.21213226,0.05425066,0.0047153267,0.00089989894,0.0142215,0.0039233244,0.0016627616,0.03899114,0.022550264,0.64603436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032474071,0.0007703716,0.54560447,0.023976153,0.010185105,0.003508105,0.034912452,0.027917832,0.007317622,0.06849617,0.27650547,0.00048145765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036823398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040957825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005342486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02083692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33359993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396856568","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2024.2347658","title":"Fraudulent participation in psychological research using virtual synchronous interviews: ethical challenges and potential solutions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster Children's Hospital; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.6571028878007732,"score_gpt":0.6432007040709535,"score_spread":0.013902183729819662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396856568","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2750305,0.008412153,0.43828154,0.22708462,0.0022447992,0.008470128,0.00020182059,0.0004763836,0.039798036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86197627,0.0025463325,0.09756419,0.017169308,0.00074437493,0.017270954,0.000091347385,0.00016402749,0.0024732444],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.20739052,0.7471064,0.012661152,0.006821846,0.021385478,0.004634601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24659458,0.61579007,0.050093677,0.055293854,0.022832831,0.009395024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.48463273,0.0012799558,0.0014774343,0.0038485462,0.020781888,0.020105043,0.0070385323,0.008837258,0.0036076545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5271271,0.0019928103,0.0013534313,0.0042925896,0.045655753,0.021624058,0.024791522,0.009194598,0.0011258632],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025196018,0.0003563849,0.014477532,0.0021626942,0.000099745215,0.0013672727,0.76157016,0.0006384159,0.0016574393,0.11144889,0.006219302,0.09975022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016219344,0.00034342278,0.0039990363,0.008522567,0.00008091706,0.0027074397,0.6192282,0.0053370926,0.0026100639,0.26526785,0.091553405,0.00018782301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022330063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004662163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009566454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026875418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63553965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406431030","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2024.2447955","title":"Ethics in Action: Personal Reflections of Canadian Psychologists","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Applied psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.3018000422771403,"score_gpt":0.5323434103995274,"score_spread":0.23054336812238707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406431030","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12723589,0.012121045,0.0019323949,0.7776376,0.006071812,0.00020838302,0.00012016978,0.00007367637,0.074599005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77402943,0.006515159,0.0018603953,0.17855145,0.000816189,0.00012709288,0.000044585508,0.00019846049,0.037857253],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94693434,0.025093893,0.0008889157,0.002468984,0.009648578,0.014965296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9291844,0.021115322,0.0028247023,0.0010259959,0.01549764,0.030351935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030445715,0.0009867846,0.0008714421,0.0023500782,0.0916018,0.018231397,0.0043612206,0.016243298,0.004738053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0665382,0.0010815767,0.0009462788,0.004705285,0.052964814,0.0068791206,0.011455593,0.039706275,0.0006728554],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005809741,0.00010659307,0.003045941,0.00012987669,0.000020379353,0.001017388,0.8484155,0.00022576019,0.0003097957,0.020683285,0.11484896,0.011138429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012388997,0.000024468183,0.0026324333,0.00028576085,0.000011265194,0.00028216618,0.76504993,0.00011084565,0.00011084448,0.0028832972,0.22848928,0.00010724968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91686934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9674782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15770242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15770242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20063326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410694487","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2025.2500356","title":"A qualitative evaluation of ETHICA-4P, a toolkit for ethical clinical decision-making and overcoming cultural barriers in psychotherapy in the United Kingdom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychotherapist; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.3553685669880825,"score_gpt":0.6327728980917181,"score_spread":0.2774043311036356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410694487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9702628,0.0005541383,0.0082596885,0.0048738504,0.00014575734,0.0036457463,0.00033477796,0.0000845873,0.011838669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714849,0.0005536844,0.017308492,0.0015140104,0.000025251522,0.004369714,0.000130322,0.00006692568,0.004546707],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9376042,0.056552123,0.001101157,0.000678114,0.002075084,0.0019892976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9325489,0.052071534,0.0023510356,0.002322823,0.0053003817,0.0054053837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04818836,0.00037341026,0.0006790377,0.001130058,0.0073409597,0.0035459609,0.0016750833,0.0014753859,0.003468681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050025787,0.00050394214,0.00046703944,0.0008125211,0.00970927,0.0018732277,0.007596111,0.002329924,0.000345217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025813142,0.00064424693,0.0034460006,0.0018999261,0.000014101207,0.0012750524,0.9352746,0.0005914161,0.001731486,0.0038494589,0.0049741874,0.046041332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119921184,0.0008187859,0.005363749,0.0017751772,0.00001905438,0.00044358548,0.9435668,0.0007277181,0.0013773487,0.0018553714,0.043859836,0.00007258383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0093802065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031119011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04818836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01334139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020656563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25484747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411028296","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2025.2512069","title":"Bridging ethics and culture: a co-created, culturally sensitive informed consent framework for research in Bimoba and Mamprusi communities in Ghana","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Bridging (networking); Research ethics; Cultural sensitivity; Culturally sensitive; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Alternative medicine; Psychiatry; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.5439419092564145,"score_gpt":0.6475948913198467,"score_spread":0.10365298206343221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411028296","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02767302,0.002699597,0.8078736,0.08198236,0.0009340036,0.043508053,0.00029212885,0.00027567983,0.034761626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18046549,0.0017736328,0.76716113,0.005978361,0.00022266811,0.041733894,0.00020213965,0.0001097684,0.0023529425],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.40618655,0.5615507,0.014267705,0.0059927353,0.00854014,0.00346226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5637734,0.36318824,0.014447472,0.025959814,0.019840904,0.012790179],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.48471254,0.0013172332,0.0012384835,0.0048268484,0.012061117,0.01331806,0.006261076,0.0074784146,0.0030437938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2569332,0.0021622449,0.0012002101,0.0036417663,0.042827737,0.012434151,0.01727138,0.012975381,0.0010065846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102616665,0.00026208308,0.0018916937,0.0019636475,0.00003192612,0.0021542204,0.5004783,0.001382386,0.0020090553,0.3948957,0.006781439,0.08804692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025088261,0.00043977684,0.0020542096,0.011327306,0.000078431185,0.0022446346,0.23567066,0.0045256396,0.0025858313,0.4525945,0.28795522,0.00027296238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064390353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01627582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51528746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01812121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10835824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6354412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411426071","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2025.2518270","title":"Bots, scammers, and fraudulent responders: a year of disrupted data collection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Data collection; Computer science; Internet privacy; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.1591134270294539,"score_gpt":0.45683318827258257,"score_spread":0.29771976124312866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411426071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82567525,0.0028777518,0.056665644,0.09015578,0.0022604414,0.0026911777,0.0012174185,0.0016576775,0.016798979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9175755,0.0018910497,0.042666517,0.02591763,0.00080431905,0.0024121427,0.00069810206,0.00056649145,0.007468309],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91941154,0.053093977,0.004942297,0.004258674,0.013911244,0.004382242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7133202,0.158648,0.039615046,0.04340836,0.029808214,0.015200147],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09902491,0.0007907038,0.00088766287,0.0039776918,0.016644845,0.008833296,0.0023036518,0.0045174607,0.0026768427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20135018,0.0017742967,0.0007189284,0.0044118366,0.009697896,0.008350699,0.01153016,0.009263382,0.0013211501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006967697,0.0010913481,0.17445515,0.00109551,0.00019311633,0.0034523355,0.26726472,0.00080380007,0.0046207,0.014877564,0.0731011,0.4583479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013102734,0.0026658564,0.21905592,0.004199496,0.00017267684,0.0072536017,0.31788406,0.005732544,0.008429682,0.019296171,0.41441834,0.00076063175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009308935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016445346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99548256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066424347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011465905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}