{"meta":{"query_hash":"1ef5d331a6a8","filters":{"venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1ef5d331a6a8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Journal+for+Philosophy+of+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1804273192","doi":"10.1007/s13194-015-0123-z","title":"Musical pluralism and the science of music","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Pluralism (philosophy); Musicology; Unitary state; Music and emotion; Philosophy of music; Music psychology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Music history; Cognitive science; Music education; Psychology; Philosophy; History; Political science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.1300788682399677,"score_gpt":0.31003808888088963,"score_spread":0.17995922064092193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1804273192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09034217,0.039662402,0.06532464,0.11430085,0.002850695,0.000049579172,0.00010678517,0.0001010609,0.68726176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97647333,0.00411038,0.0068895416,0.0030351388,0.0016087288,0.000029628001,0.000034091605,0.000032908938,0.007786282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971409,0.0013433942,0.00016382881,0.00036802577,0.0008022822,0.00018163343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961869,0.0022273522,0.00027897052,0.00052963267,0.0004506783,0.00032644926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004714544,0.0002972001,0.0007248119,0.0014830945,0.003314117,0.006454395,0.0010527867,0.0031310427,0.0039241766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007423673,0.00026485225,0.0004732052,0.000808069,0.035513807,0.0075043957,0.0049118316,0.004261054,0.00038081838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015298,0.000008454436,0.00006786941,0.000030732117,0.0000052544065,0.000023145974,0.0008661228,0.000097070224,0.00013465059,0.995155,0.00046556463,0.0031309067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007310651,0.0000043299137,0.00010400845,0.000012173205,0.0000013567912,0.000022812312,0.00017611161,0.00013452623,0.000020233827,0.9938216,0.0056925905,0.0000028423794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017346836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016714394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006454395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025109977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019161372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024933219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998670726","doi":"10.1007/s13194-014-0104-7","title":"Chunk and permeate II: Bohr’s hydrogen atom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Bohr model; Philosophy of science; Hydrogen atom; Atom (system on chip); Hydrogen; Chemistry; Computational chemistry; Physics; Philosophy; Physical chemistry; Quantum mechanics; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11553056603072269,"score_gpt":0.2573920276523769,"score_spread":0.1418614616216542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998670726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11964477,0.0054474054,0.04835827,0.029413281,0.0036445498,0.00009027795,0.00021383847,0.0005024507,0.7926851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399148,0.0009694423,0.0044662743,0.001849616,0.0006984812,0.00005716893,0.00006869549,0.00021304822,0.051762525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976414,0.00008232748,0.0000043898253,0.000035840516,0.000055910517,0.00005737417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996836,0.00013454366,0.000014498614,0.00009990725,0.000024179191,0.000043243977],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046783278,0.00028055688,0.0003985315,0.0003850554,0.0024715872,0.002131657,0.00083996804,0.0021308346,0.013304831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002510969,0.00022832527,0.00023061663,0.00035964235,0.008646393,0.007260392,0.002542602,0.0022634692,0.0015359663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002117037,0.0000031954035,0.000037117294,0.000015557336,0.0000030646308,0.000051702336,0.0011229167,0.00020070205,0.00015542959,0.99214035,0.00386042,0.0023884322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011098661,0.00000779857,0.000053129635,0.000010843132,0.000001948512,0.000035654077,0.00050566444,0.00048249256,0.00014126147,0.9816854,0.017057806,0.000006778448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015919844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012053887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99752843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080327643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006495314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044509113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999013273","doi":"10.1007/s13194-015-0107-z","title":"Modular architectures and informational encapsulation: a dilemma","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Modular design; Modularity (biology); Dilemma; Computer science; Cognitive science; Encapsulation (networking); Perception; Architecture; Cognition; Epistemology; Psychology; Programming language; Biology; Philosophy; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.09135982688471339,"score_gpt":0.29025948792893297,"score_spread":0.19889966104421958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999013273","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21895732,0.017614068,0.42582276,0.17500383,0.0010129003,0.000084856096,0.00031468523,0.00043601266,0.1607536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93837845,0.0032564236,0.050567612,0.002617792,0.0010178969,0.00014019728,0.00009356242,0.00009934794,0.0038287693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728286,0.0013478026,0.00015416989,0.0003949006,0.00062051415,0.00019979301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796911,0.013085911,0.0007609316,0.0045695147,0.0012204346,0.0006721252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083079925,0.00051922566,0.0011834387,0.00082793395,0.0016419181,0.0069264495,0.0019417976,0.004679781,0.0051044514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020347005,0.00068132137,0.00070183055,0.00074182963,0.017099202,0.024972962,0.0044202707,0.004644687,0.0008986086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017102104,0.0000072465286,0.00010547092,0.000026155401,0.000008695586,0.000015557362,0.00023019881,0.0004677841,0.00015297768,0.992159,0.0006146716,0.0061950553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000960952,0.000003693666,0.00008383023,0.000013618966,0.0000027540636,0.00002542672,0.00007456086,0.0009421189,0.000062008796,0.9972963,0.0014811374,0.0000049370838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007215384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052748347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0083079925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013122126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014631477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043937385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793136765","doi":"10.1007/s13194-018-0204-x","title":"Interpreting theories without a spacetime","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Trinity College, University of Cambridge; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Universiteit van Amsterdam","keywords":"Spacetime; Theoretical physics; Philosophy of science; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Quantum gravity; Quantum field theory; Field (mathematics); Physics; Quantum; Computer science; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics; Philosophy; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.04866581219659747,"score_gpt":0.268741986713469,"score_spread":0.22007617451687153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793136765","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12127987,0.0065412656,0.58297056,0.026728636,0.0019464613,0.00009979895,0.0003334709,0.00055951526,0.2595404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9006319,0.001804151,0.082798764,0.0022934591,0.000714064,0.00010728385,0.00026463717,0.00023123572,0.011154426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421495,0.0036287305,0.00027041568,0.0006552809,0.0009495268,0.00028096183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481297,0.0026035714,0.00051294407,0.0012344668,0.00065361266,0.00018257246],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006710439,0.0009441557,0.0008624011,0.0024108894,0.0027923975,0.0054097604,0.0014049922,0.0030416457,0.0040750406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008514067,0.0005113824,0.0015612749,0.0014534171,0.021518981,0.01638235,0.005504853,0.004748304,0.0005325698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028176094,0.0000015867247,0.00002788617,0.000016786451,0.0000030787255,0.000028582806,0.00087942136,0.00024423198,0.0000914103,0.9979436,0.00015467037,0.00060598383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004459567,0.0000069684265,0.000038397284,0.000020703432,0.000005238928,0.000036489768,0.0003705629,0.0009936743,0.00010962627,0.9916604,0.006746917,0.0000065268746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015543166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011676797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023040783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016993006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035488605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807730028","doi":"10.1007/s13194-018-0209-5","title":"Multiple diversity concepts and their ethical-epistemic implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"British Columbia Centre on Substance Use; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Meaning (existential); Biobank; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Biology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10220008216834262,"score_gpt":0.36225928472987695,"score_spread":0.26005920256153436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807730028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08837883,0.006114241,0.21992956,0.16134676,0.0014158088,0.0002944579,0.00010422095,0.00006809434,0.52234805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631312,0.0008914827,0.026381511,0.0038688125,0.000403604,0.00042034185,0.000022070006,0.000035820765,0.004845179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94797456,0.037689388,0.0015600544,0.0037508653,0.006646162,0.0023789054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92971456,0.057367373,0.0033609688,0.0040160944,0.0032131113,0.0023279018],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048256356,0.0011447159,0.0012396431,0.0046089725,0.015863277,0.0116276555,0.0027061095,0.011033481,0.0062025175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044482272,0.00082121725,0.0014098703,0.002832348,0.1320685,0.03202763,0.027259378,0.011293647,0.0004273515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004015956,0.000004969246,0.000106073334,0.000014625246,0.0000018780236,0.000058634032,0.0050868536,0.000059897324,0.000035204837,0.9933965,0.0001833671,0.0010480196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009861943,0.0000066930647,0.000096223215,0.000075422824,0.000004223482,0.00011969294,0.005796498,0.00021989824,0.00009839918,0.98471767,0.008846233,0.000009204869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014639762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013678109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007727274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055291154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25520706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885602347","doi":"10.1007/s13194-018-0214-8","title":"Correction to: Multiple diversity concepts and their ethical-epistemic implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Philosophy of science; Diversity (politics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1672837494723178,"score_gpt":0.473520227688325,"score_spread":0.3062364782160072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885602347","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020472218,0.00041698053,0.00057320175,0.14360917,0.8517245,0.000028047247,0.00059824565,0.0002424491,0.0026027209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037218217,0.0039170478,0.0053761676,0.2788569,0.48567784,0.00059950753,0.0013148821,0.0016802192,0.18535912],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903476,0.0019782635,0.0018208555,0.001373832,0.0033419684,0.0011374804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90782017,0.033787653,0.0039357278,0.00793505,0.043236203,0.0032851386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067974385,0.0019665903,0.0026372808,0.0034890021,0.006819845,0.00646382,0.00538314,0.017543344,0.058005385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16322863,0.0014720886,0.0015494714,0.0031445976,0.0069585317,0.00436939,0.004292712,0.024546977,0.0309781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032410197,0.0000040379114,0.000057014782,0.00008603976,0.000010280366,0.00018807067,0.00012200328,0.000026313095,0.000019311328,0.001666399,0.9957212,0.0020668993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008396277,0.000013554406,0.0006792516,0.00045689248,0.00004272384,0.0006503097,0.00049762765,0.0003944369,0.00024093907,0.0052759,0.99159414,0.00007027813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020280894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021133926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058005385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076124156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010095093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19404739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907551885","doi":"10.1007/s13194-018-0240-6","title":"Understanding does not depend on (causal) explanation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.27557985721054296,"score_gpt":0.304684522003964,"score_spread":0.029104664793421053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907551885","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07400662,0.002221551,0.4973584,0.060561404,0.0005211393,0.0001301419,0.0004923758,0.000535663,0.36417267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580048,0.0007095863,0.031131549,0.0023267649,0.00021408562,0.00015554072,0.0002830108,0.00013727952,0.0070374175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905743,0.004012116,0.00056369853,0.0020323526,0.0018890714,0.00092851225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97284794,0.015204938,0.0018261931,0.007469166,0.0018580941,0.0007936049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010137582,0.0006978143,0.0015315252,0.0023067894,0.002822476,0.0061102756,0.0020823486,0.005917671,0.009095006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030611683,0.0008531429,0.0020385522,0.001089527,0.023467693,0.030414369,0.008184654,0.006962846,0.0013645757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011777381,0.000008506658,0.0003290467,0.000044330445,0.000014539836,0.000044445078,0.0007114991,0.00051782804,0.00008742058,0.99523085,0.00045255985,0.0025471018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006392531,0.0000059095655,0.00015729362,0.000032857406,0.000011822835,0.00006142465,0.00021093183,0.0011051479,0.0001115299,0.9944654,0.0038248822,0.0000063427237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023727561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001638048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010137582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025925953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002800265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053613305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951643236","doi":"10.1007/s13194-018-0244-2","title":"An antidote for hawkmoths: on the prevalence of structural chaos in non-linear modeling","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"CHAOS (operating system); Philosophy of science; Chaotic; State (computer science); Mathematical model; Scientific modelling","score_opus":0.06127541200664299,"score_gpt":0.2797520482496342,"score_spread":0.21847663624299118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951643236","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12780301,0.029519895,0.3784679,0.3877834,0.005464287,0.00005010733,0.0005270371,0.00086038985,0.06952399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93986857,0.005992301,0.032633256,0.009938469,0.0046602264,0.00007054315,0.00007028676,0.0003046626,0.0064616203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985164,0.00066954433,0.00007011302,0.00028948073,0.00036662785,0.000087839006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676568,0.02565152,0.0010590103,0.0033085886,0.0015883785,0.0007355834],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052225157,0.0005135774,0.0013511814,0.0011033913,0.0022381884,0.0030196013,0.0016997949,0.0047019906,0.0054500583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037937272,0.000631612,0.0006495159,0.00070158986,0.015664598,0.015361086,0.0047387006,0.009748819,0.00057210255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005338112,0.000013986,0.00067891076,0.00008772827,0.000028776723,0.00010875135,0.00050905783,0.0038833446,0.00027214052,0.9731923,0.010847206,0.010324455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000145333115,0.000013658291,0.0001685168,0.000051892697,0.0000043765485,0.000045004992,0.00007346096,0.011298155,0.000117958814,0.9812294,0.0069625936,0.000020254121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016587599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012808382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091527053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006539832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0276196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100163245","doi":"10.1007/s13194-020-00335-4","title":"The modal status of the laws of nature. Tahko’s hybrid view and the kinematical/dynamical distinction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Université de Genève; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Metaphysics; Natural law; Physical law; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Modal; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Law; Mathematics; Theoretical physics; Physics; Political science; History","score_opus":0.017479923161064795,"score_gpt":0.2949340364058036,"score_spread":0.27745411324473884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100163245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17466295,0.009165458,0.28596893,0.034228206,0.0013069407,0.000098667726,0.0005975581,0.00036402314,0.49360722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98613924,0.00046624246,0.008046261,0.0007456255,0.0002159061,0.000052505377,0.00004815233,0.00003380794,0.0042522745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986511,0.00035545483,0.000082261235,0.00037838312,0.0003116711,0.00022111351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978168,0.0010306872,0.00025557238,0.0003365313,0.00036543963,0.00019494015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024102125,0.00039017847,0.00046908983,0.0021502196,0.0028372759,0.00363205,0.0010253702,0.0025333792,0.0038781164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035789078,0.0004883061,0.0009445156,0.0008860687,0.017590351,0.009354101,0.0033409803,0.0030668378,0.0004443124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001339427,0.0000027546696,0.00010925535,0.000014239823,0.0000028526945,0.00002321035,0.00038754762,0.00008791138,0.00020943714,0.9977906,0.00025041852,0.0011085275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017322598,0.000013060815,0.0005551858,0.000021218282,0.000014474553,0.00007222246,0.00021123701,0.001176522,0.00035574794,0.9914967,0.006051592,0.000014728723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002924106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015823639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038781164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027295076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012968032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01980406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155784772","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00361-w","title":"Feyerabend, funding, and the freedom of science: the case of traditional Chinese medicine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Argument (complex analysis); Academic freedom; Intellectual freedom; Government (linguistics); China; Science studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Censorship; Higher education; Medicine","score_opus":0.09535885830801384,"score_gpt":0.27546396776779775,"score_spread":0.18010510945978392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155784772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18325114,0.010032513,0.005530175,0.16108507,0.00040391367,0.0001071529,0.00008426215,0.000027596145,0.6394782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836061,0.00095083844,0.000714583,0.0034235243,0.0002111981,0.00004590431,0.000008475547,0.00001208324,0.011027222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467975,0.0024468754,0.0001864615,0.00047512286,0.00070257194,0.0015091585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924655,0.005462507,0.0003355431,0.0006684122,0.00046836634,0.00059964095],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010202917,0.0003483325,0.00071239815,0.0012988793,0.013249441,0.008321352,0.0012344786,0.00979725,0.009260901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009018413,0.00037929398,0.0005914673,0.0016850124,0.047216848,0.0076188906,0.006967276,0.004840122,0.0003401019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026243526,0.000011133869,0.00036439244,0.000021916749,0.0000053062768,0.00016324132,0.0042513297,0.00009925222,0.00005889103,0.991305,0.001178492,0.0025148776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012033375,0.000039035887,0.0017726275,0.00016614691,0.000035038727,0.000261988,0.0057337605,0.00047700427,0.0002650714,0.91934353,0.07174846,0.00003700799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045169912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041847058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98979706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012822094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01609989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09303123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162838340","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00381-6","title":"On the mitigation of inductive risk","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Biochemical engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.058772575285939564,"score_gpt":0.3253130743973655,"score_spread":0.26654049911142597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162838340","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0396996,0.0047665844,0.62660116,0.0534888,0.0009997413,0.00007623345,0.0000745242,0.000110021094,0.2741833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9339419,0.0028659361,0.044004746,0.002409861,0.0012178904,0.00014792029,0.000033875713,0.0000719454,0.015305938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99046797,0.0062048337,0.00023307347,0.000622982,0.0019099789,0.00056115293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96912116,0.025123311,0.0014784922,0.0020390237,0.0018864505,0.00035150538],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010372204,0.00081036997,0.0009206197,0.0017802836,0.0015479162,0.0032921205,0.0024842576,0.0031643438,0.0074571203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030143257,0.00040642856,0.0012115943,0.0010397696,0.016554372,0.006514054,0.005010522,0.0039965087,0.00066672935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010852921,0.000012790794,0.00011199144,0.000031386156,0.000010532121,0.000018133136,0.00014063227,0.00423033,0.00008232247,0.9892793,0.0005655187,0.00550621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044506683,0.0000101355145,0.000080948026,0.000021587464,0.000004858901,0.000013780315,0.000045435056,0.0032109648,0.000120616445,0.9936678,0.0028132794,0.000006152263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015094171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009986454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99845207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030034578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020453036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054854155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186997889","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00398-x","title":"Symmetry and partial belief geometry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Credence; Metric (unit); Epistemology; Pairwise comparison; Space (punctuation); Commutative property; Philosophy of science; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Theoretical physics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Physics; Geometry; Machine learning","score_opus":0.08882463160913935,"score_gpt":0.28686787312208845,"score_spread":0.1980432415129491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186997889","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20595147,0.0025214665,0.614724,0.015586806,0.0003459413,0.00015626963,0.00092609605,0.00026788955,0.15952015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96114033,0.000401842,0.03145146,0.00039416063,0.00016606045,0.00012650274,0.00030779518,0.00005512867,0.0059567303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526477,0.0026016615,0.00030253097,0.00079715345,0.00070765935,0.00032614925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98803407,0.0076314043,0.000743167,0.0015953504,0.0014366558,0.0005594017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004480876,0.0005485433,0.0015709692,0.0014587014,0.0027690558,0.004535251,0.0012397156,0.0015689858,0.0077244453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016199838,0.0005242195,0.0020207334,0.0011795773,0.010234956,0.008563588,0.0036530474,0.003241394,0.0007110748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009988503,0.00000358299,0.00007281015,0.000010371829,0.000009782453,0.000010951117,0.00012699308,0.000391158,0.000031444506,0.99823016,0.00013545857,0.00096733635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052076302,0.0000037757438,0.00004339541,0.0000025286802,0.0000024330468,0.000009880169,0.000029942817,0.0009548566,0.000023568218,0.9986016,0.0003197945,0.000002916823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025018228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012779363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077244453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023483324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017781961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025840819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208152664","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00405-1","title":"Values and inductive risk in machine learning modelling: the case of binary classification models","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Stuttgart; Concordia University; University of Twente","keywords":"Underdetermined system; Philosophy of science; Machine learning; Computer science; Binary number; Artificial intelligence; Inductive bias; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Minification; Binary classification; Inductive reasoning; Mathematics; Support vector machine; Epistemology; Multi-task learning; Algorithm; Engineering","score_opus":0.23911181067140713,"score_gpt":0.31714197691261425,"score_spread":0.07803016624120712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208152664","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0677063,0.002641272,0.83949065,0.042384367,0.0002929506,0.00013396393,0.00010425582,0.000093412156,0.047152776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8588403,0.0008984929,0.13667874,0.0009795872,0.00050343573,0.0002746449,0.000050058163,0.00007810155,0.0016967348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89609903,0.08924611,0.0021486324,0.002459037,0.008694056,0.0013531095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63589525,0.33674055,0.008429871,0.010906531,0.006125024,0.0019027423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07449934,0.0011830645,0.001852369,0.0038293079,0.0028804673,0.012290235,0.0032113316,0.0063489224,0.0030340133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21602993,0.0010354315,0.0016503124,0.002913019,0.030091714,0.01321731,0.009583914,0.008246964,0.00032060532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019701592,0.00001451195,0.00041474492,0.000038299877,0.000025769958,0.000055894237,0.0004981229,0.010620062,0.000035854588,0.9845887,0.00025831535,0.0034300815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074180816,0.00000868176,0.00007853087,0.000039743845,0.0000063213693,0.000026301614,0.00008488483,0.028917681,0.00006233021,0.9701461,0.0006102428,0.000011884769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017663949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00127537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99711955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006862315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023374045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39399487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205514433","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00438-6","title":"How to Incorporate Non-Epistemic Values into a Theory of Classification","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Feature (linguistics); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0912980083658049,"score_gpt":0.2549228296855493,"score_spread":0.1636248213197444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205514433","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033058926,0.0016441006,0.7513601,0.036763735,0.00080581836,0.0001126043,0.00023096442,0.00031347148,0.1757102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8557915,0.0006429754,0.13265768,0.0018054657,0.0003429205,0.0002249068,0.00019816523,0.00020974838,0.0081266025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902734,0.005714103,0.0005635593,0.0011359928,0.0017262414,0.000586702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98510695,0.007881591,0.00089046685,0.0036606898,0.0018258112,0.0006344945],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013897785,0.0008023634,0.00095319154,0.004592414,0.004531388,0.009053643,0.0026716248,0.0043102102,0.005845902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015071192,0.00070305495,0.0019985256,0.0029917846,0.03262118,0.025093148,0.0062828218,0.0061943373,0.0011056319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026602513,0.0000021908609,0.00007247196,0.000009405704,0.0000029589135,0.000010602464,0.0003190695,0.00015229831,0.000031047864,0.9979838,0.00019761075,0.0012160023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002575975,0.0000018738097,0.000028019083,0.000011806745,0.0000027919655,0.00001194798,0.00008543842,0.00068745227,0.00003522292,0.9966652,0.002464356,0.0000032699868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003529442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036099795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059133805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030203937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07349944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297347335","doi":"10.1007/s13194-022-00483-9","title":"On the status of quantum tunnelling time","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich; University of Cambridge; California Institute of Technology","keywords":"Minority interpretations of quantum mechanics; Interpretations of quantum mechanics; Quantum tunnelling; Quantum mechanics; Physics; Measurement problem; Theoretical physics; Philosophy of science; Quantum; Classical physics; Quantum dynamics; Quantum process; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03584928934507886,"score_gpt":0.26329555595777243,"score_spread":0.22744626661269357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297347335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48426294,0.011611966,0.20120867,0.061088867,0.002115749,0.000062460094,0.000276623,0.00022375447,0.239149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99171597,0.00074083905,0.0046923384,0.00050289184,0.00019885293,0.000026743543,0.000021922824,0.00004534884,0.0020551404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695766,0.0014645602,0.00015115927,0.00047899614,0.0006055957,0.0003420066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982498,0.010799317,0.0018913097,0.002008794,0.0018909816,0.00091170566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063064615,0.00030216167,0.00078671775,0.0013655097,0.003335268,0.0044766115,0.0014465476,0.0029352964,0.0058545265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026998935,0.00033041314,0.00045198612,0.0012686875,0.021660173,0.017682439,0.0034097491,0.004561177,0.0004773622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001584681,0.000003761152,0.00008317599,0.00001623364,0.0000017672788,0.000023428845,0.0003709056,0.00021744393,0.00011696852,0.99772185,0.00016757108,0.001261067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003912131,0.000010959503,0.00007467807,0.000021199889,0.0000022445947,0.000021126949,0.00024323522,0.0010117462,0.00014177964,0.99654716,0.0019123057,0.000009667078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010331096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048031207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063064615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023259039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012495683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033352137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309432961","doi":"10.1007/s13194-022-00489-3","title":"A mechanistic guide to reductive physicalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Physicalism; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Chemistry; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.06281841383281853,"score_gpt":0.2742150434565949,"score_spread":0.2113966296237764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309432961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029720997,0.007711672,0.38631678,0.038835857,0.003013441,0.00011373779,0.0005049484,0.000434028,0.56009746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41061893,0.014942043,0.2150294,0.016327607,0.011573394,0.0015058344,0.0007737826,0.0015471895,0.3276819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987399,0.000593636,0.000074371936,0.00017375126,0.00033838104,0.000079990896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998711,0.00073859445,0.000076098724,0.00024304214,0.00018130941,0.00004999417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025434871,0.0011965357,0.0011265079,0.0024711029,0.0030691407,0.0037655907,0.0029183629,0.0041503133,0.019882172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003216984,0.0010675956,0.001888405,0.0014296916,0.01685919,0.009137684,0.0038633982,0.008806276,0.00487113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.8288616e-7,0.00000196134,0.000003188978,0.000006754538,0.0000014206241,0.0000049225114,0.000047100457,0.00006643001,0.000010380725,0.9983205,0.0010312562,0.0005053628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028066465,0.0000021814556,0.000009535206,0.000009080311,0.0000012939904,0.000015775446,0.000016664782,0.00019256258,0.00001571411,0.98293316,0.016798755,0.0000024166302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016103543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013333192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019882172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027668406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001534918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066512465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313646620","doi":"10.1007/s13194-022-00504-7","title":"Generalized frameworks: Structuring searches for new physics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Structuring; Frontier; Generalization; Epistemology; sort; Theoretical physics; Physics beyond the Standard Model; Management science; Physics; Computer science; Particle physics; Engineering; Economics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.16451212995555584,"score_gpt":0.30002872721289453,"score_spread":0.1355165972573387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313646620","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09656431,0.0020590543,0.8542333,0.0036892523,0.00019512814,0.00028004046,0.0016864636,0.0021442932,0.039148074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54307216,0.0010331859,0.4444724,0.00048430148,0.00015944977,0.00027917267,0.0029452916,0.0011378286,0.0064161546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815685,0.00073833734,0.00011891333,0.0003809433,0.00038935244,0.0002156547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225074,0.0051620533,0.0003730225,0.0013327663,0.0005536103,0.00032772496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023525343,0.00081173365,0.0013395515,0.0057908967,0.0028688305,0.005150343,0.0025153572,0.0018935106,0.012012878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02105577,0.0008669804,0.0025500364,0.004952994,0.004676095,0.012730022,0.007302543,0.003225615,0.0013070556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004701463,0.000021654869,0.0007796377,0.00013846862,0.000034042587,0.000106749525,0.00091924943,0.0028549284,0.0004385638,0.9640799,0.0025790394,0.028000737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008401682,0.0000067719106,0.000092598,0.000035530295,0.000015389835,0.000028989081,0.0003570247,0.011858905,0.0001632071,0.9817924,0.005631456,0.00000923364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028143306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039613727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99713117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015995807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019246752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04018706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376632698","doi":"10.1007/s13194-023-00551-8","title":"On the consistency of relative facts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute; Western University","funders":"Australian Research Council; Foundational Questions Institute; Fetzer Institute; Griffith University; John Templeton Foundation; Silicon Valley Community Foundation","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Consistency (knowledge bases); Contradiction; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Theoretical physics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Physics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.06024246756440798,"score_gpt":0.28995999146294354,"score_spread":0.22971752389853556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376632698","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17310035,0.0033591639,0.50828373,0.054427925,0.0020948295,0.00026533363,0.0014563557,0.00082387,0.25618842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93412834,0.0005598615,0.054770295,0.004731706,0.00074791606,0.00026665148,0.0005011894,0.00015401271,0.0041400054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97239244,0.013166094,0.0019323073,0.005225974,0.005674684,0.0016084429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9395282,0.03659113,0.004174354,0.011585791,0.0071624555,0.00095799787],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024948336,0.0006655266,0.0021273082,0.003835636,0.0041188425,0.0057732626,0.0043033864,0.0061560073,0.0101504475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084908485,0.001508323,0.0020025221,0.002498252,0.016589856,0.019712962,0.008778868,0.009303563,0.0012486654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002646989,0.000008257416,0.0001955254,0.000037891896,0.00001805663,0.000079660844,0.00028252485,0.00026660442,0.00016634096,0.99667007,0.00077834993,0.0014704022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003789813,0.00001653094,0.00022414287,0.000067253946,0.000020271153,0.00009884154,0.00017417784,0.0020464044,0.000389049,0.9924413,0.0044642817,0.000019862151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014638334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007861156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99588114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003254438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015760498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13194102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382560127","doi":"10.1007/s13194-023-00535-8","title":"Should social pragmatic communication disorder be included in DSM-5? On uncertainties, pragmatic considerations, and the psychiatric kind debate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Philosophy of science; Set (abstract data type); Property (philosophy); Epistemology; DSM-5; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Psychiatry; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08907482702553855,"score_gpt":0.3285503951435632,"score_spread":0.23947556811802467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382560127","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032221172,0.027620835,0.0032498525,0.88683426,0.007069464,0.000036051286,0.00011562262,0.00002049716,0.04283222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8043871,0.01162491,0.0033084874,0.16741028,0.011198021,0.00013277766,0.00015688449,0.000041757397,0.0017398428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792047,0.012374599,0.0020993317,0.00091620255,0.0040806006,0.0013244979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9428977,0.045690406,0.0028997913,0.001831863,0.0042963596,0.002383941],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035879243,0.00045019563,0.0018131798,0.0027322478,0.006297563,0.007204342,0.003295602,0.015313565,0.0026291695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06486645,0.00054951163,0.00095965917,0.0017538538,0.03672777,0.010986172,0.007111843,0.015005329,0.00033416325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002441014,0.00006860995,0.0044597457,0.000479197,0.00009388465,0.0018860219,0.026526297,0.00024556488,0.0003288696,0.876966,0.027777245,0.06092442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010118904,0.00006745892,0.0063883257,0.0034620794,0.00009739072,0.0019080066,0.030003691,0.00061209186,0.00019082605,0.8898755,0.06717245,0.00012105315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014606909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017958548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004636029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009888368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18974984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390539580","doi":"10.1007/s13194-023-00565-2","title":"Inductive risk and epistemically detrimental dissent in policy-relevant science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Philosophy of science; Faith; Harm; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04170654725012795,"score_gpt":0.2774333138015308,"score_spread":0.23572676655140284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390539580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27545556,0.0019496586,0.25795034,0.09685255,0.0014198604,0.0001869747,0.00013043861,0.00019920824,0.36585543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98801744,0.00018796106,0.0056311153,0.0014609986,0.00039082876,0.00007356619,0.000011806666,0.00002313874,0.0042032464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736953,0.01655794,0.0010338024,0.0018361094,0.0050532273,0.0018236355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83876276,0.14025036,0.005855976,0.0069100354,0.0053660027,0.0028549165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03318217,0.00060770276,0.0011868202,0.0021783859,0.0040112077,0.0061598714,0.0020043822,0.0065717446,0.0075361454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12492,0.00056429516,0.0010602085,0.0010041093,0.023023788,0.009171802,0.010338105,0.007884913,0.0005874621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050489183,0.00003519208,0.00043395167,0.00003396142,0.000021962069,0.000060235754,0.00042328413,0.0012557587,0.00009380036,0.99520004,0.00036150898,0.0020296918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012472887,0.000004511921,0.000096617914,0.000007015859,0.000005110922,0.000012716613,0.00007843498,0.001163028,0.000067752866,0.9982039,0.0003441721,0.0000042564784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008918033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010096258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037322699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040806932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1754862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391540577","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00568-7","title":"Ethnobiological kinds and material grounding: comments on Ludwig","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover","keywords":"Naturalness; Materiality (auditing); Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Focus (optics); Analytic philosophy; Philosophy of technology; Sociology; Animism; Metaphysics; Contemporary philosophy; Aesthetics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.12361610151068492,"score_gpt":0.291316817786281,"score_spread":0.16770071627559607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391540577","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005252632,0.004346119,0.0021091092,0.9522321,0.0017637407,0.000014889731,0.00006289398,0.000049677474,0.034168743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37384644,0.004940341,0.0030474965,0.5867707,0.0046497155,0.00018301669,0.000079227895,0.00021872959,0.026264371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900535,0.005956925,0.0003183128,0.0014326946,0.0016016011,0.00063709484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625967,0.032787617,0.0006871715,0.0013356226,0.0019884545,0.0006044374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019102827,0.00066443306,0.0010534724,0.002261298,0.010289972,0.008986146,0.0033881762,0.02131089,0.00601565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03665105,0.00061367505,0.0006859998,0.00398763,0.044616193,0.017160745,0.00929108,0.021174433,0.0011359899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022901937,0.000006884703,0.0001453101,0.000031879204,0.000004408345,0.00010450576,0.004795612,0.0001701896,0.00003401611,0.8983206,0.093865044,0.0024986374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044590037,0.000012180791,0.0004175177,0.00032739431,0.000011537204,0.00012099083,0.007795673,0.0006193844,0.00030967238,0.59834754,0.39192173,0.00007176603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01482281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011152787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98971003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012617473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045808842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101026595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392017579","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00570-z","title":"Physicists’ views on scientific realism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Scientific realism; Epistemology; Realism; Philosophy of technology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1471245284648702,"score_gpt":0.2960545348922343,"score_spread":0.14893000642736412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392017579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03978033,0.00972866,0.009703595,0.38981876,0.0038529187,0.000029985305,0.00016790096,0.00008356534,0.54683423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409058,0.0023751247,0.0015393385,0.029905783,0.005294026,0.000056698347,0.00004893463,0.00007706681,0.01979723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917264,0.0038555942,0.00030106294,0.00085311744,0.0024515176,0.00081233756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826031,0.012093814,0.0009957174,0.001543914,0.001628927,0.0011345648],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013469898,0.0004386958,0.0011250087,0.003977909,0.0078893155,0.0070786504,0.0018053992,0.013848735,0.0075528724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021820342,0.0008374789,0.0010495451,0.0020416055,0.036629666,0.009346441,0.0062860707,0.015911954,0.0008659418],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008970425,0.00000523365,0.00004078407,0.00001118553,0.0000064826095,0.000018199089,0.00086721504,0.00009542764,0.000030248837,0.99646133,0.0019617106,0.0004932984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026935597,0.000007980705,0.00018638404,0.000026289763,0.0000058001146,0.000030164767,0.00023580459,0.00015694137,0.00004858104,0.97905993,0.020205058,0.000010270987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038560797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033316717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99211067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007109086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036413942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07123649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396534168","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00581-w","title":"Reconstructions of quantum theory: methodology and the role of axiomatization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Calculus (dental); Quantum; Theoretical physics; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics; Physics","score_opus":0.037741680160357415,"score_gpt":0.2956918417009682,"score_spread":0.2579501615406108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396534168","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024192546,0.0039655124,0.9260185,0.011580419,0.00041443988,0.000054127147,0.00016722002,0.0001665676,0.033440568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7381381,0.0030753328,0.2498881,0.0011093424,0.0008289853,0.00016568523,0.00026624027,0.00023323706,0.006294888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897106,0.0076819314,0.0003919102,0.00092996814,0.0010500702,0.00023555764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96759385,0.023674678,0.0012967883,0.004644474,0.0021854548,0.00060472067],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018118493,0.0008058785,0.0013963338,0.00315726,0.0019405215,0.0077310745,0.0034881516,0.0030257932,0.00548681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045143712,0.0010367902,0.0012830292,0.0018713038,0.020987786,0.022445323,0.0055533103,0.0060334164,0.0006624199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004450593,0.0000029825974,0.00005345968,0.000013476579,0.0000042444212,0.0000049424134,0.00007115376,0.0004054623,0.00002289415,0.9978988,0.000116695766,0.0014013993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003105191,0.00000307644,0.00003033018,0.000008905438,0.0000015426176,0.0000086608015,0.00003185944,0.0024619552,0.000039770406,0.99668556,0.0007220341,0.0000032422304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012420352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092211476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99805945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027600771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021149144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095820844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399214606","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00583-8","title":"Overdetermination, underdetermination, and epistemic granularity in the historical sciences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Underdetermination; Overdetermination; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Granularity; Quine; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12991325091226683,"score_gpt":0.3202747933627813,"score_spread":0.19036154245051448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399214606","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29000935,0.0074822702,0.48334566,0.057460096,0.0006838722,0.0001241401,0.00020576056,0.0002062769,0.16048263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894912,0.0004369759,0.009050557,0.00029385867,0.0001255266,0.000018571855,0.000017217255,0.000016310487,0.00054965355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98093146,0.012092398,0.0010608424,0.0016187845,0.0035308744,0.00076563854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8837757,0.08972582,0.009002486,0.010895503,0.0047068307,0.001893687],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028553123,0.00045617216,0.0011128813,0.005599433,0.0041274535,0.010541131,0.0015245888,0.0041679437,0.0035668856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069656424,0.0007558452,0.0007886716,0.0038046495,0.05741504,0.019261682,0.009991599,0.004975476,0.00023410968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021553013,0.000007873721,0.0004436608,0.00004324736,0.000009674062,0.000037780785,0.0016895565,0.0012769342,0.00008605146,0.99418074,0.00012583786,0.002077024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005160374,0.000004766475,0.0001929413,0.000038188155,0.0000072537073,0.000028185825,0.0003685569,0.0017195408,0.0001056176,0.99642247,0.0011001398,0.0000070871147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021388696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016408828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99587256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050567226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028604933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15100521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401013511","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00596-3","title":"Two species of realism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Universidad de Murcia; European Commission","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Realism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Scientific realism","score_opus":0.09988845971000591,"score_gpt":0.2774133291720423,"score_spread":0.17752486946203638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401013511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030692922,0.005375923,0.17978317,0.0697303,0.0023217832,0.00018927528,0.0003022315,0.00019487199,0.7114095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92571896,0.00138732,0.031788696,0.0065360256,0.0011785795,0.00033014492,0.00017085929,0.00014310764,0.03274619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858386,0.008116504,0.0004626032,0.0016752342,0.003120131,0.0007869311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98735714,0.006748879,0.00096603646,0.0025055886,0.0017510653,0.0006713438],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009306592,0.0006346799,0.00079344097,0.0022755207,0.0042926203,0.007719604,0.0017590718,0.00486376,0.0110822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018460752,0.00042168403,0.0013116322,0.0010632733,0.031745546,0.010509625,0.0074655632,0.0082947435,0.0012360164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037420052,0.0000020504926,0.000030685653,0.000009570912,0.0000022171448,0.000006654033,0.00037071336,0.00005188365,0.00002634961,0.9982704,0.0005222477,0.00070347055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000139763815,0.000010003092,0.00007791022,0.000044265544,0.0000036093545,0.000050266364,0.0003234797,0.0005058913,0.00006075609,0.97688806,0.022013674,0.000008111078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096012186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009914015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004734106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017735434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049218595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}