{"meta":{"query_hash":"1ef5d331a6a8","filters":{"venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1ef5d331a6a8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Journal+for+Philosophy+of+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1804273192","doi":"10.1007/s13194-015-0123-z","title":"Musical pluralism and the science of music","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Pluralism (philosophy); Musicology; Unitary state; Music and emotion; Philosophy of music; Music psychology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Music history; Cognitive science; Music education; Psychology; Philosophy; History; Political science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.1300788682399677,"score_gpt":0.31003808888088963,"score_spread":0.17995922064092193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1804273192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809996,0.000018107132,0.00034639833,0.002191348,0.0014319177,0.00024032411,0.00000605318,0.000013772832,0.014752491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983231,0.000024320927,0.00054243667,0.00078172394,0.00026319444,0.0000015119505,4.435264e-8,0.000009604467,0.000054067226],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713534,0.00020828715,0.0004414148,0.00046636735,0.0013594854,0.00038910814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998304,0.00017551458,0.00039520478,0.0003432332,0.0004333182,0.00034870458],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007902754,0.00012739521,0.00020449689,0.0003732411,0.0009924613,0.00016503662,0.0016878805,0.000009654528,0.000005379193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042867246,0.00007769559,0.000088001725,0.001541533,0.02634415,0.001215513,0.00034945144,0.00020132649,0.0000064503774],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011185853,0.000037515245,0.0000041933827,0.0000062263675,4.2758643e-7,0.0000072549324,0.0027647435,0.0000372877,0.93341607,0.060390864,0.00016852583,0.0030550642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013541594,0.0040009646,0.009745855,0.00039438592,0.00008195537,0.0031074153,0.002430529,0.0076872124,0.7425731,0.21001193,0.0054704663,0.00095461414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002368963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.1149632e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19084297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033897988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003859229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9763056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998670726","doi":"10.1007/s13194-014-0104-7","title":"Chunk and permeate II: Bohr’s hydrogen atom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Bohr model; Philosophy of science; Hydrogen atom; Atom (system on chip); Hydrogen; Chemistry; Computational chemistry; Physics; Philosophy; Physical chemistry; Quantum mechanics; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11553056603072269,"score_gpt":0.2573920276523769,"score_spread":0.1418614616216542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998670726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48901033,0.0011465331,0.000057489673,0.0038089666,0.0017436828,0.00016569645,0.0000342681,0.00004106937,0.50399196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996712,0.000021878048,0.00053150335,0.00032274754,0.00097616337,0.0000011747527,6.0560217e-7,0.000015304022,0.0014185748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983701,0.000057618046,0.00035137637,0.00030055633,0.00058836926,0.00033197104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868405,0.0000219766,0.000259968,0.00019628712,0.0004558987,0.00038180058],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025755102,0.00014985415,0.0001899168,0.0002875319,0.0024927866,0.00019978115,0.0008376197,0.000009553113,0.000050539293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106304746,0.00012289378,0.00009290046,0.00012062134,0.0063929837,0.0011948062,0.00016638509,0.00016561308,0.00003111042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010451186,0.00013564627,0.00003584425,0.000033848686,0.000018542318,0.000037121717,0.063623466,0.000028226426,0.0058407392,0.92057997,0.0034424237,0.006119638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011407176,0.0021061362,0.00017723929,0.00012560854,0.000033164368,0.0002186678,0.0016738473,0.00018656075,0.000817524,0.24078456,0.7523381,0.0003978826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000037460388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013224059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74889565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049826507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016445246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999013273","doi":"10.1007/s13194-015-0107-z","title":"Modular architectures and informational encapsulation: a dilemma","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Modular design; Modularity (biology); Dilemma; Computer science; Cognitive science; Encapsulation (networking); Perception; Architecture; Cognition; Epistemology; Psychology; Programming language; Biology; Philosophy; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.09135982688471339,"score_gpt":0.29025948792893297,"score_spread":0.19889966104421958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999013273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7452343,0.0000642556,0.0031045866,0.0020244136,0.00074709405,0.0002339231,0.000028550357,0.000041109965,0.24852178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714726,0.000006458235,0.002169725,0.00035845127,0.0002899291,0.000001098274,7.404766e-7,0.0000069815096,0.000019335768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874717,0.00007670954,0.00027126833,0.00017169985,0.00054918975,0.00018398406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991651,0.000058252295,0.0001944121,0.00009716201,0.0002541283,0.00023090957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013211541,0.00008478186,0.00008561673,0.00023821823,0.0004442131,0.00011364024,0.00032713212,0.0000081838625,0.0000043655177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011692016,0.00006854704,0.00004141529,0.0002773926,0.00092423003,0.0005856785,0.00007385283,0.000097382435,0.00001086042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002333748,0.00008836166,0.00007161358,0.00004961225,0.0000054859024,0.00003344521,0.004198736,0.0068915905,0.119359404,0.8303505,0.0002781109,0.03843974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010984541,0.000573289,0.001121216,0.00006901125,0.000008138923,0.0007415499,0.00009051005,0.008100066,0.021246618,0.9643587,0.0024126437,0.00017979355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.681769e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.1335528e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25191298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017780974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009374558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34165728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793136765","doi":"10.1007/s13194-018-0204-x","title":"Interpreting theories without a spacetime","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Trinity College, University of Cambridge; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Universiteit van Amsterdam","keywords":"Spacetime; Theoretical physics; Philosophy of science; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Quantum gravity; Quantum field theory; Field (mathematics); Physics; Quantum; Computer science; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics; Philosophy; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.04866581219659747,"score_gpt":0.268741986713469,"score_spread":0.22007617451687153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793136765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05421197,0.000103415725,0.0011946218,0.0023279241,0.0032400128,0.00012466391,0.000016179367,0.000045996345,0.9387352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936969,0.000003871893,0.0017131115,0.0004289865,0.0029559506,9.555746e-7,2.3764844e-7,0.000016484712,0.0011834519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984593,0.000077471756,0.000362832,0.00027871213,0.0004791672,0.00034253852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985036,0.00004885327,0.00035551272,0.00021796396,0.00069447805,0.00017956246],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030870303,0.00014226319,0.00017780243,0.00030763558,0.0028074482,0.0002968659,0.0011393816,0.000007683652,0.0002976985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029406376,0.00011150735,0.00012278305,0.00013925557,0.016594594,0.0010589508,0.000115126786,0.00016462439,0.00010543384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008586261,0.00003657754,0.00002337721,0.0000144017395,0.000007937916,0.000004231414,0.03933576,0.0000013203731,0.00639036,0.95084053,0.00080110325,0.0024585298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075071777,0.0034333365,0.00013940902,0.000516056,0.00003237435,0.00012329043,0.0032917801,0.00027963286,0.0042678355,0.6849443,0.30170795,0.00051335176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021415865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023689927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93948495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003848378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109902765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99849075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807730028","doi":"10.1007/s13194-018-0209-5","title":"Multiple diversity concepts and their ethical-epistemic implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"British Columbia Centre on Substance Use; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Meaning (existential); Biobank; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Biology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10220008216834262,"score_gpt":0.36225928472987695,"score_spread":0.26005920256153436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807730028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5722308,0.00064416946,0.006421293,0.085462585,0.0021029015,0.00049359037,0.00006303161,0.000069541005,0.33251208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980288,0.000075044125,0.00078501913,0.00050827407,0.0004311263,7.897335e-7,2.1239721e-7,0.000003957067,0.00016673413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989146,0.0002442953,0.00019437121,0.00020690645,0.00019035056,0.00024945047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987567,0.00029084182,0.00018111081,0.00012361248,0.00048072284,0.00016702594],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039542834,0.00007520504,0.00012569873,0.00007945339,0.0070908605,0.000041963274,0.00061676226,0.000031199186,0.000008492469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090811105,0.000060275794,0.000058163147,0.00026611116,0.013125099,0.00017077429,0.00029740506,0.00020036698,0.000008466723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014267891,0.000115597235,0.04760405,0.000045087512,0.0000772312,0.000006639785,0.2860639,0.0000017184113,0.007998646,0.6345802,0.0050374847,0.018326774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019301111,0.0016482216,0.27534565,0.0001911115,0.000053842374,0.00012348183,0.031118836,0.00005057593,0.0019597623,0.6217252,0.06523628,0.00061690994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001362018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017470606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42579806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031340205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011237514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885602347","doi":"10.1007/s13194-018-0214-8","title":"Correction to: Multiple diversity concepts and their ethical-epistemic implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Philosophy of science; Diversity (politics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1672837494723178,"score_gpt":0.473520227688325,"score_spread":0.3062364782160072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885602347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44162276,0.000103269886,0.11401533,0.17510341,0.018463375,0.0015192792,0.00006760366,0.00011965616,0.24898532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902347,0.000027287042,0.0030404082,0.0054430375,0.001000925,0.0000030207705,5.115145e-7,0.000011179701,0.0002389309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735004,0.0012901603,0.00041994228,0.00027133725,0.00035481685,0.0003137081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99290854,0.004690651,0.00040646043,0.00024502608,0.0013366374,0.00041270643],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015556154,0.000092442424,0.00014476952,0.00014067248,0.008422362,0.000020403786,0.0006601291,0.00005950651,0.0000361132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025982657,0.00007185678,0.000044542685,0.0004121053,0.0034047586,0.00027209896,0.0006319691,0.0025244525,0.000079237805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001196126,0.00037979518,0.059430916,0.00049633475,0.000099411984,0.000011024353,0.18959612,0.000027127093,0.20580857,0.32827774,0.15630746,0.058369372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004202946,0.004067166,0.2746814,0.002823942,0.00008602224,0.0002343812,0.01699278,0.0017981323,0.0030348839,0.6033944,0.087870635,0.00081336295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014155256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008034473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54861194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009229682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024077314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907551885","doi":"10.1007/s13194-018-0240-6","title":"Understanding does not depend on (causal) explanation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognitive science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.27557985721054296,"score_gpt":0.304684522003964,"score_spread":0.029104664793421053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907551885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3499629,0.000036108388,0.0018011887,0.004601566,0.008000466,0.0002991533,0.000050815215,0.000036952617,0.6352109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970051,0.000013808813,0.0001972468,0.0004165944,0.00094806036,4.4898974e-7,0.0000012862239,0.000014477279,0.0014029808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988224,0.000090305824,0.00027773855,0.00019271272,0.00041240914,0.00020444575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991215,0.0001461077,0.0002847188,0.0001514261,0.00021402838,0.00008224657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022534716,0.000099221,0.00014291822,0.00021682157,0.0007546903,0.00016065672,0.00039444814,0.000010907799,0.00008630589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010568257,0.00006784113,0.000095204996,0.000052220377,0.00096158,0.00048967934,0.00003103001,0.00021657911,0.00006228996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004488056,0.000029822819,0.000024434605,0.000031545424,0.000010919868,0.0000039836873,0.0070118983,0.0000386093,0.004060971,0.98829216,0.00015233213,0.00029846537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020019335,0.002735265,0.00038477086,0.0005368851,0.00005913131,0.000039062343,0.011540458,0.0003783038,0.012854666,0.9236526,0.04522372,0.00059318956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000018003416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005880473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6470422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058499536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051703715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5804544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951643236","doi":"10.1007/s13194-018-0244-2","title":"An antidote for hawkmoths: on the prevalence of structural chaos in non-linear modeling","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"CHAOS (operating system); Philosophy of science; Chaotic; State (computer science); Mathematical model; Scientific modelling","score_opus":0.06127541200664299,"score_gpt":0.2797520482496342,"score_spread":0.21847663624299118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951643236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947498,0.000041250914,0.001443839,0.0002903265,0.0002797935,0.00035041937,0.00008007284,0.0000034601467,0.0027610555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970215,0.000007924094,0.0027008934,0.00011188176,0.00012685369,2.607878e-7,0.0000021536487,0.000003019872,0.000025518018],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988176,0.00009323094,0.00034980467,0.00020426592,0.00031327928,0.00022182197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999176,0.00021005305,0.00019069087,0.00019266763,0.00014111797,0.00008946192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024897694,0.00008581949,0.00014061612,0.00013123824,0.00027442345,0.000029599361,0.0007631479,0.000010947549,0.00014517792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017395169,0.000049493035,0.00007122749,0.0002442297,0.00032475908,0.0003540657,0.000010983686,0.00012639666,0.000009923465],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023208474,0.000024515059,0.028254563,0.00009218623,0.0000048303273,0.0000011388544,0.0006397085,0.9612717,0.0037110231,0.0030008643,0.0000037101988,0.0027636935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035726186,0.0012993462,0.09328752,0.000059323585,0.000004710473,0.0000029819375,0.000057093213,0.8846992,0.00017482051,0.01996918,0.000012514837,0.00007602736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005080332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010169562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07657246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000031186921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037835835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2110671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100163245","doi":"10.1007/s13194-020-00335-4","title":"The modal status of the laws of nature. Tahko’s hybrid view and the kinematical/dynamical distinction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Université de Genève; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Metaphysics; Natural law; Physical law; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Modal; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Law; Mathematics; Theoretical physics; Physics; Political science; History","score_opus":0.017479923161064795,"score_gpt":0.2949340364058036,"score_spread":0.27745411324473884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100163245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55531347,0.004623043,0.006109147,0.048020545,0.0050520794,0.0008590391,0.00016195061,0.000018202005,0.37984252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999195,0.000092926966,0.00026815198,0.00021232493,0.000167557,0.0000021265857,3.298096e-7,0.000008089737,0.000053538315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974718,0.0007058879,0.0005784244,0.00024668156,0.000642566,0.00035461105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976842,0.0008594057,0.00046104984,0.0004688266,0.00037375887,0.0001527737],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042884666,0.00011486128,0.0002358861,0.000037474518,0.0007694064,0.000054515334,0.0011005265,0.000020557145,0.00003079808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020743825,0.000049834336,0.00019378167,0.0005458115,0.011821565,0.00012277326,0.00026784898,0.00045689358,0.0000021718854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017728841,0.00006980715,0.00003726618,0.00002238965,0.000017639353,0.000004761542,0.000290489,0.0000106737525,0.0020758195,0.99305725,0.00003361869,0.004202983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010105962,0.00022108581,0.00964045,0.00014527683,0.00004977352,0.00025669686,0.00014972278,0.00075668655,0.0019272006,0.984452,0.00130089,0.000089621135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000019405209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.8980675e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44388148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001777682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010016698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155784772","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00361-w","title":"Feyerabend, funding, and the freedom of science: the case of traditional Chinese medicine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Argument (complex analysis); Academic freedom; Intellectual freedom; Government (linguistics); China; Science studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Censorship; Higher education; Medicine","score_opus":0.09535885830801384,"score_gpt":0.27546396776779775,"score_spread":0.18010510945978392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155784772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7943202,0.0011568379,0.00005446578,0.010286588,0.0025481787,0.00025251997,0.000065474764,0.0000071270797,0.19130859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841183,0.00002528115,0.00015202798,0.00014576215,0.0011004114,0.0000012560845,3.6090174e-7,0.000006417794,0.00015663287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980476,0.00015374362,0.00055031216,0.0002531857,0.0007776568,0.00021753891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977357,0.0003846868,0.00054170244,0.00028542202,0.00091837475,0.00013411298],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076188217,0.00012248845,0.0002628431,0.0002803851,0.0034932864,0.00010306585,0.0010900217,0.000005900245,0.00014838975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090441457,0.00006034074,0.00011088279,0.00048829144,0.06657322,0.00069200876,0.0001294069,0.00019970349,9.602104e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006682432,0.00011303224,0.0000234428,0.000027092028,0.000012773218,0.000075272845,0.04438876,0.00002201855,0.0043590907,0.95008904,0.00022384775,0.0005988065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006460207,0.0033958636,0.004069381,0.0004617993,0.00018012048,0.0052118367,0.04021502,0.0011361514,0.00084042776,0.9311218,0.0064979573,0.00040939118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024620807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016380009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20409162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021901107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026534847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99780405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162838340","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00381-6","title":"On the mitigation of inductive risk","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Biochemical engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.058772575285939564,"score_gpt":0.3253130743973655,"score_spread":0.26654049911142597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162838340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.685681,0.000028356299,0.0018275331,0.0110424785,0.00076242845,0.00016069277,0.000007391378,0.0000075653065,0.30048257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981737,0.00014142526,0.0009157554,0.0002097709,0.00020787843,6.349496e-7,1.740416e-7,0.000003501375,0.00034712898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986644,0.00039100595,0.00018823966,0.00011193667,0.00052388804,0.00012053783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899256,0.00010678862,0.00027585472,0.00011646592,0.00044049957,0.00006783036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040909764,0.000041190662,0.00006470635,0.00008314894,0.0010268479,0.000051529612,0.00039293244,0.00000627818,0.00009812818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011200585,0.000028625873,0.00007695986,0.0004529466,0.0015759781,0.00020367649,0.000039419192,0.000108881024,0.000012389803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018259196,0.00007634886,0.00012106991,0.000005252294,0.0000123228665,0.000003417775,0.01813928,0.000099909994,0.0063646766,0.9546455,0.0018228679,0.018691095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009306893,0.000791822,0.035817485,0.0002709247,0.000057946203,0.000006955305,0.035276216,0.00011819744,0.012848609,0.84410346,0.06950528,0.00027242588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007994207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036811975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31249276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034372897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013420131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78977877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186997889","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00398-x","title":"Symmetry and partial belief geometry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Credence; Metric (unit); Epistemology; Pairwise comparison; Space (punctuation); Commutative property; Philosophy of science; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Theoretical physics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Physics; Geometry; Machine learning","score_opus":0.08882463160913935,"score_gpt":0.28686787312208845,"score_spread":0.1980432415129491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186997889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5106052,0.0031118316,0.0010994083,0.007252519,0.0068149655,0.0001619838,0.00007444854,0.000040053033,0.4708396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948521,0.0000940072,0.0008242643,0.00056559476,0.0019326037,4.5014679e-7,0.0000012427246,0.0000136091385,0.00171613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882334,0.00011326649,0.0003090149,0.00021665268,0.00029927722,0.00023844566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886036,0.00010496916,0.00019824572,0.00015562243,0.0005283396,0.00015246612],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020028814,0.00009809158,0.0001771333,0.00019578652,0.0010519591,0.00019339171,0.00029197457,0.000011869741,0.00006517166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003419659,0.00008307286,0.00010466371,0.00014906729,0.003393897,0.00036400705,0.00009546728,0.00024242749,0.000012617644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014784852,0.00006988337,0.00007020051,0.00006279374,0.000022745524,0.000038459,0.0060744323,0.0000026741939,0.0027911796,0.9861631,0.00053221977,0.0041575707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019353626,0.0014912537,0.0015638067,0.00038637966,0.000151388,0.00050552323,0.00643145,0.000111721354,0.01576076,0.39474696,0.57623553,0.00067985855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000012276192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001040786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5914161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010956546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011391719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208152664","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00405-1","title":"Values and inductive risk in machine learning modelling: the case of binary classification models","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Stuttgart; Concordia University; University of Twente","keywords":"Underdetermined system; Philosophy of science; Machine learning; Computer science; Binary number; Artificial intelligence; Inductive bias; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Minification; Binary classification; Inductive reasoning; Mathematics; Support vector machine; Epistemology; Multi-task learning; Algorithm; Engineering","score_opus":0.23911181067140713,"score_gpt":0.31714197691261425,"score_spread":0.07803016624120712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208152664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911852,0.00022177768,0.0037745575,0.0018422091,0.00018631158,0.00008041552,0.000011649531,0.000004394723,0.0026935188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976986,0.0003517164,0.0017813556,0.00006885662,0.000054543136,7.827034e-7,3.004783e-7,0.000006334687,0.000037512353],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865896,0.00041779593,0.00029742884,0.0002667063,0.0002157534,0.00014335012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992118,0.0001528346,0.00030350647,0.00011997642,0.00014705601,0.00006486275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018910295,0.00007564656,0.000110235844,0.00014799117,0.00053768005,0.000025734818,0.00027497526,0.000011044227,0.0000025440447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003063828,0.000052944444,0.000047739733,0.0003968548,0.0012600968,0.0003630816,0.00008510278,0.00031491902,8.844813e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026904765,0.0005325848,0.00049987313,0.000043463857,0.000011800782,0.00085237075,0.006308762,0.3402598,0.57823515,0.061820075,0.000032877775,0.011134219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078340387,0.0006143083,0.0018711021,0.000116035444,0.00001758691,0.0025896125,0.0009011317,0.677556,0.01859401,0.296785,0.000037773418,0.000134099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000064536216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.8336635e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5596411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017160826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045887264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46428794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205514433","doi":"10.1007/s13194-021-00438-6","title":"How to Incorporate Non-Epistemic Values into a Theory of Classification","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Feature (linguistics); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0912980083658049,"score_gpt":0.2549228296855493,"score_spread":0.1636248213197444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205514433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58718985,0.0004935474,0.005641332,0.029333707,0.0069320565,0.000997095,0.0001956337,0.00007286824,0.36914393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657714,0.0000041096414,0.0012259153,0.00026344514,0.00051642756,0.0000069315124,0.0000012536419,0.0000144203605,0.0013903651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981563,0.00018407613,0.0004087483,0.00029121543,0.0007411632,0.00021850399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983856,0.00006153234,0.00064722175,0.00026417515,0.00047192807,0.00016950695],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048381262,0.00012206616,0.0001974006,0.0005578993,0.0027148623,0.00014760731,0.0014639283,0.000005308913,0.00006759781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015722937,0.00010886411,0.00013017328,0.0003142854,0.0035509986,0.00075728906,0.00020970748,0.00019512375,0.000008191053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014904403,0.00010528628,0.000011592168,0.00004699736,0.00000928172,0.000005565172,0.04184089,0.00010164381,0.073065534,0.87914515,0.0009041321,0.0046148663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004746388,0.00259398,0.00039397803,0.00010329235,0.000025610509,0.00003625304,0.01079449,0.00020474955,0.0018164007,0.9370445,0.046217944,0.00029413472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000024156086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.800091e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4093873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010997254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017713264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297347335","doi":"10.1007/s13194-022-00483-9","title":"On the status of quantum tunnelling time","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich; University of Cambridge; California Institute of Technology","keywords":"Minority interpretations of quantum mechanics; Interpretations of quantum mechanics; Quantum tunnelling; Quantum mechanics; Physics; Measurement problem; Theoretical physics; Philosophy of science; Quantum; Classical physics; Quantum dynamics; Quantum process; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03584928934507886,"score_gpt":0.26329555595777243,"score_spread":0.22744626661269357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297347335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91259444,0.000056298726,0.045963634,0.0022083046,0.0004970799,0.00035568632,0.0002521394,0.0000095811565,0.03806281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995807,0.0000021444064,0.00019403089,0.000047993602,0.0001188881,0.0000040403106,0.0000015403145,0.000009335999,0.000041317802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904096,0.00006557351,0.00023467546,0.0001178915,0.00031659796,0.00022429055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992459,0.00009630832,0.00029127247,0.00017580895,0.000103897044,0.00008681565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013666836,0.000059540973,0.00008449267,0.000075364434,0.0009462637,0.000023758023,0.00058959634,0.0000014978671,0.00025487907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021158985,0.00004261655,0.00009522516,0.00030653592,0.0002236432,0.000057714555,0.00009363349,0.0001610087,0.000011923705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001132242,0.0000704308,0.000009017671,0.0000015154383,0.00000643063,2.465338e-7,0.00018032658,0.00068654254,0.017097488,0.9805428,0.00036089958,0.0010329952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000213746,0.0004441613,0.000068911366,0.000018584311,0.000009070364,0.0000023474088,0.000321546,0.016324874,0.003805869,0.9744053,0.0043085706,0.00007701433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000016950451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.3293514e-9,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08698624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015902679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009333046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7277991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309432961","doi":"10.1007/s13194-022-00489-3","title":"A mechanistic guide to reductive physicalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Physicalism; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Chemistry; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.06281841383281853,"score_gpt":0.2742150434565949,"score_spread":0.2113966296237764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309432961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042438533,0.00013988544,0.0020312234,0.012965208,0.008557796,0.0005827637,0.00026723117,0.000079467776,0.9329379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933514,0.0000013850059,0.0016588052,0.0009571939,0.0015602807,0.000010013181,8.9528095e-7,0.00001802235,0.0024420049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795604,0.0001132288,0.00037337432,0.00035003666,0.00086925155,0.0003380481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988028,0.000042456395,0.00027374708,0.00023260635,0.00038810394,0.0002603339],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025434236,0.00013176972,0.00018016723,0.00041239843,0.0048379106,0.00014187001,0.0015219548,0.000003134461,0.00036576577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016686706,0.00012226103,0.00014595459,0.00028260972,0.0024439194,0.0005177173,0.000284704,0.00023324824,0.000044898356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006266922,0.0001112527,1.5367884e-7,0.00000857279,0.000007159917,0.000017545286,0.0212786,0.00019798272,0.02106305,0.94697547,0.008695893,0.0015816308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003989219,0.002374979,0.00001788511,0.00003814252,0.000021545591,0.00008645655,0.0032793477,0.00010922821,0.0007833984,0.33525047,0.6573436,0.00029601553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000052784644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.886525e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015006309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018133843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99645764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313646620","doi":"10.1007/s13194-022-00504-7","title":"Generalized frameworks: Structuring searches for new physics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Structuring; Frontier; Generalization; Epistemology; sort; Theoretical physics; Physics beyond the Standard Model; Management science; Physics; Computer science; Particle physics; Engineering; Economics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.16451212995555584,"score_gpt":0.30002872721289453,"score_spread":0.1355165972573387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313646620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5429349,0.0012352694,0.034465536,0.03582658,0.028063793,0.0026900014,0.0005938617,0.00085331994,0.35333672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98208135,0.00003073924,0.00805304,0.00036010225,0.00690018,0.0000039561105,0.000003524201,0.000034524088,0.0025325795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982296,0.000044760538,0.000367765,0.0003202846,0.0005658015,0.00047177443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874055,0.00011727052,0.00027017065,0.00021720091,0.00037923834,0.00027558953],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020325137,0.00015615803,0.00020896333,0.00031352259,0.0024390824,0.00032010346,0.0011550254,0.000018216637,0.00006049559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002429287,0.00013341666,0.0002195741,0.00028696333,0.0029307473,0.0009329837,0.0001024034,0.00028235745,0.000036983027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071358845,0.000024684034,0.00000367795,0.000060198843,0.000016075765,0.000005738198,0.01530356,0.00048518824,0.0071242256,0.9551431,0.008062044,0.013700134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007799772,0.00054867606,0.00008574365,0.00013671516,0.000018753186,0.000010159711,0.00056241866,0.0010188514,0.0019387759,0.8933962,0.10123963,0.0002640859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000032086841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.751877e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43914646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004527567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021489906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376632698","doi":"10.1007/s13194-023-00551-8","title":"On the consistency of relative facts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute; Western University","funders":"Australian Research Council; Foundational Questions Institute; Fetzer Institute; Griffith University; John Templeton Foundation; Silicon Valley Community Foundation","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Consistency (knowledge bases); Contradiction; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Theoretical physics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Physics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.06024246756440798,"score_gpt":0.28995999146294354,"score_spread":0.22971752389853556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376632698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8072942,0.000015796311,0.017052883,0.0063285083,0.0004377181,0.00034446578,0.00010786061,0.000015739994,0.16840282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99963105,0.0000018616039,0.00016243641,0.00003207365,0.0000887667,0.0000019468694,8.705129e-7,0.000006301491,0.00007471703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993289,0.000037191956,0.00020661652,0.00010013566,0.00020593042,0.00012123342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922395,0.00016503014,0.00023621619,0.00015382122,0.00016828364,0.000052684216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012119653,0.00005341998,0.00007785585,0.00008391273,0.0004439803,0.000018892515,0.00039659312,0.0000028074064,0.000030762447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058890808,0.000033844146,0.000088025525,0.00044986492,0.00041193343,0.00008802493,0.000043102413,0.00009969583,0.000039118437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035277603,0.000021195518,0.000014021507,0.0000017783981,0.0000072158855,2.6057745e-7,0.00018815091,0.000021389753,0.005670959,0.9926624,0.0004106241,0.0009984788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013220434,0.00015726301,0.00057432876,0.0000458386,0.0000064156125,7.734847e-7,0.00019830248,0.00052562525,0.0048609204,0.9928506,0.00060396653,0.00004378672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.667871e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.113915e-9,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19233683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000044200906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056845805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34147823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382560127","doi":"10.1007/s13194-023-00535-8","title":"Should social pragmatic communication disorder be included in DSM-5? On uncertainties, pragmatic considerations, and the psychiatric kind debate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Philosophy of science; Set (abstract data type); Property (philosophy); Epistemology; DSM-5; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Psychiatry; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08907482702553855,"score_gpt":0.3285503951435632,"score_spread":0.23947556811802467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382560127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67124337,0.0014049147,0.000038107126,0.20278929,0.0022414483,0.0016546036,0.000091271366,0.000059609945,0.120477386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972471,0.0001466685,0.0002816798,0.0018027751,0.00030574916,0.000011427306,0.000008060819,0.000013069638,0.00018344258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982713,0.00045223662,0.00054223876,0.00014343126,0.00035863818,0.00023218193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989127,0.0003924298,0.0003483315,0.00016742593,0.00010611334,0.00007299633],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004280789,0.000110004556,0.00017405966,0.00031518735,0.0029867282,0.00021790757,0.00034039925,0.000011568861,0.000053985892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020483916,0.00007258993,0.000056687215,0.00024243719,0.0017634006,0.00026501226,0.00007047163,0.00026181366,0.00001129554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014026246,0.00008642144,0.00010546442,0.00015926464,0.000009305504,0.0000016594313,0.044833984,0.000053529646,0.0000076191673,0.9476572,0.0053307703,0.001614483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059519657,0.00068287953,0.003806092,0.0004039098,0.00004690225,0.000038107108,0.015575888,0.002814603,0.0000050364324,0.9434884,0.026864728,0.0003214441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026375612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010806774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32600376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002748824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011544641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390539580","doi":"10.1007/s13194-023-00565-2","title":"Inductive risk and epistemically detrimental dissent in policy-relevant science","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Philosophy of science; Faith; Harm; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04170654725012795,"score_gpt":0.2774333138015308,"score_spread":0.23572676655140284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390539580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.842511,0.0014676836,0.00018433428,0.0042023095,0.002720926,0.00029796123,0.00007551856,0.00004555952,0.14849469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980909,0.000084223044,0.00060342904,0.00008648436,0.00093599356,0.0000017518504,2.4881e-7,0.000013486597,0.0001834709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997852,0.000069918926,0.00045166272,0.00049209467,0.00071358506,0.00042070672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990482,0.00009498187,0.00018725719,0.00016274881,0.0002284502,0.00027839662],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004061203,0.00015746521,0.00018121656,0.001381055,0.001736035,0.0005401684,0.00091829157,0.0000096925205,0.000020865078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003614496,0.00012434291,0.00008558114,0.0006804528,0.017225383,0.0017773831,0.0001757672,0.00034658142,0.000016937342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004800806,0.00008937252,0.00007508095,0.000054439937,0.0000072970247,0.000048515853,0.031651784,0.000012805645,0.040450525,0.91367924,0.000076379016,0.013806566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001583158,0.0033783563,0.00643089,0.001969054,0.00006681787,0.00051718333,0.0065260236,0.0019373278,0.006963573,0.9080837,0.06139725,0.0011466648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003452278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006851172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1555799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023925892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004711146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391540577","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00568-7","title":"Ethnobiological kinds and material grounding: comments on Ludwig","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover","keywords":"Naturalness; Materiality (auditing); Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Focus (optics); Analytic philosophy; Philosophy of technology; Sociology; Animism; Metaphysics; Contemporary philosophy; Aesthetics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.12361610151068492,"score_gpt":0.291316817786281,"score_spread":0.16770071627559607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391540577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5041298,0.0003618078,0.0000745932,0.0074918675,0.0113554625,0.00021652458,0.00012337202,0.0000936774,0.47615287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970047,0.00002090052,0.00019049324,0.00045606878,0.0018473091,0.000001233037,0.0000013545451,0.000011573909,0.00046637078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987219,0.00006625229,0.00029089293,0.00030512043,0.00035557535,0.00026024564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945116,0.00006872931,0.00010661118,0.00011450206,0.00009718008,0.00016179736],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019912529,0.00013411864,0.00014968247,0.00030466527,0.0015230571,0.0005615343,0.00057771936,0.000012164216,0.00015472205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006137284,0.00009573784,0.00008418088,0.00009521798,0.004834545,0.0006376571,0.00008530034,0.00020689264,0.000035167697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073380375,0.00005545563,0.000004026289,0.000046316243,0.000009778122,0.00003659141,0.00568094,0.0000016748647,0.00783162,0.9781614,0.0020330574,0.0060657784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007075415,0.004987971,0.0005695743,0.0007542649,0.00004007264,0.00020221608,0.00080563873,0.00016959813,0.0014540955,0.37495404,0.6148223,0.00053265895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000013014347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.8965704e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6127893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043422267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004274734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392017579","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00570-z","title":"Physicists’ views on scientific realism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Scientific realism; Epistemology; Realism; Philosophy of technology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1471245284648702,"score_gpt":0.2960545348922343,"score_spread":0.14893000642736412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392017579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026372353,0.0009570734,0.00018329144,0.004232245,0.014055913,0.00021934911,0.00008794365,0.00010107566,0.9537908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911818,0.00001351777,0.00025331113,0.00032380552,0.0028462042,0.0000016535477,0.000001818018,0.000022768289,0.00535513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780786,0.00006927911,0.00042233308,0.00048648988,0.0008509308,0.00036308772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988897,0.000071154696,0.0001812025,0.0003103272,0.00034100082,0.00020661145],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003642944,0.0001714575,0.0001854688,0.0006681301,0.0027540226,0.001192914,0.0012159835,0.000008262124,0.00015718775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008818675,0.00013079814,0.00023432182,0.0003479329,0.008849204,0.0012162426,0.00006581332,0.0002622889,0.0003600215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020774616,0.00006196368,1.7298831e-7,0.000058605176,0.0000070497613,0.000027801794,0.015608949,0.000015838874,0.007797774,0.95379305,0.014010062,0.008597956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001570089,0.00068975886,0.000015286003,0.00042866138,0.000015367505,0.000031016993,0.00028429783,0.00020587983,0.00081826764,0.21210387,0.78504544,0.00020511553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000013773137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011871615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9648094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007527067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018883777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396534168","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00581-w","title":"Reconstructions of quantum theory: methodology and the role of axiomatization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Calculus (dental); Quantum; Theoretical physics; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics; Physics","score_opus":0.037741680160357415,"score_gpt":0.2956918417009682,"score_spread":0.2579501615406108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396534168","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1796248,0.00063995295,0.8057246,0.0009927944,0.00044148037,0.00022164818,0.000066777066,0.000007388288,0.01228056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563146,0.000014839613,0.004229598,0.000003951684,0.00010472074,0.000002002302,6.6054264e-7,0.0000056925164,0.00000710602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999318,0.00014952179,0.00027115725,0.00009408775,0.0000963738,0.00007083664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926704,0.00025350446,0.0002095735,0.000100838595,0.00013833598,0.000030729207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029388797,0.000046179346,0.00011410549,0.00010672158,0.00019443693,0.000023043729,0.00021760905,0.0000042876522,0.000017198412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046580368,0.000029813642,0.00007277653,0.0002880604,0.0009936267,0.00010581778,0.000035403584,0.00006728689,8.014694e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012028684,0.00000973002,0.000014531794,0.000009645871,0.000016189,3.5209936e-8,0.00042034916,0.000010228194,0.021319378,0.9569356,0.0000054400234,0.021246884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015911234,0.000056671128,0.000050202707,0.00004808476,0.000026440213,0.000009916046,0.00055976695,0.008912346,0.011272865,0.9785837,0.00029214093,0.00002878069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000018626232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.646129e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81600666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000025797463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052563228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36610588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399214606","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00583-8","title":"Overdetermination, underdetermination, and epistemic granularity in the historical sciences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Underdetermination; Overdetermination; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Granularity; Quine; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12991325091226683,"score_gpt":0.3202747933627813,"score_spread":0.19036154245051448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399214606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67635006,0.005700563,0.0015784818,0.058706995,0.009015754,0.00063768483,0.000031030257,0.00010578327,0.24787368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986664,0.000045213783,0.00017519656,0.00020836182,0.00058435666,0.0000015340705,2.6359297e-7,0.000008445164,0.00031023534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986005,0.00024217961,0.00031512917,0.00020730268,0.00046842895,0.00016649671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992224,0.00027816027,0.000115865856,0.000095404255,0.00024591023,0.000042251602],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008650508,0.000083516694,0.00011356024,0.0002830791,0.0008721125,0.00036825688,0.0004953235,0.000010738614,0.0000044903054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002667715,0.00005458731,0.00006628059,0.00018224737,0.0038768556,0.0005849927,0.000034967517,0.00023730243,0.0000019727763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035974747,0.00003207055,0.00006438925,0.0000814126,0.0000032836099,0.0000139983495,0.02566939,0.0000038262524,0.00017486655,0.9687532,0.00046921187,0.004730712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027234404,0.0004911764,0.0017157856,0.00023234356,0.00003482365,0.0001472231,0.0019413634,0.00079678465,0.00005554447,0.93368167,0.060469,0.00016196916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008647903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011029191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32231635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007842838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012981122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401013511","doi":"10.1007/s13194-024-00596-3","title":"Two species of realism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Universidad de Murcia; European Commission","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Realism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Scientific realism","score_opus":0.09988845971000591,"score_gpt":0.2774133291720423,"score_spread":0.17752486946203638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401013511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018542463,0.0010784253,0.00026967414,0.0022915956,0.0042951596,0.00010084102,0.00007154662,0.000040317474,0.97331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994699,0.000038142727,0.00063683855,0.000111801266,0.0019092903,6.1642464e-7,6.460539e-7,0.000013698222,0.00258995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848664,0.000044526263,0.0004363917,0.0002377805,0.00056194473,0.0002326986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907345,0.000066236964,0.00019914214,0.00017956666,0.0003515831,0.00013004408],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022637453,0.00011459865,0.00017610309,0.0004763062,0.0008536614,0.00021811227,0.0009065112,0.0000055792575,0.00025326744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008621116,0.00008966707,0.00018051165,0.00020301214,0.0071266927,0.0009516716,0.0000669397,0.00016124405,0.000034786408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015796522,0.000027235756,9.702213e-7,0.00006597498,0.0000083123105,0.000016925575,0.0119892005,0.000011422474,0.013295843,0.9707608,0.0020107648,0.0017967502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040399778,0.0010469782,0.0000920027,0.0006508947,0.000039411287,0.000084653526,0.0013555771,0.00024022478,0.0035484484,0.39635277,0.5958954,0.00028964135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004581257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015695762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97615653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035424382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014816556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99557537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}