{"meta":{"query_hash":"07f7f71a8707","filters":{"venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/07f7f71a8707","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Journal+of+Comparative+Law+and+Governance"},"results":[{"id":"W1529929387","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00101006","title":"Double Reasoning in the Codified Mixed Systems – Code and Case Law as Simultaneous Methods","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Jurisprudence; Law; Tort; Syllogism; Jurisdiction; Causation; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy of law; Terminology; Correctness; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Liability; Linguistics; Philosophy; Algorithm","score_opus":0.058273377018420114,"score_gpt":0.3064186016921694,"score_spread":0.24814522467374928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529929387","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02250669,0.0009307582,0.9123856,0.002867287,0.000116592186,0.00025414058,0.00007432086,0.00012207995,0.060742613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54055965,0.00035456574,0.4510967,0.0005554057,0.00012331051,0.0009166278,0.00010837561,0.00009996786,0.0061853584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9254466,0.05246764,0.003830117,0.0046079904,0.01210879,0.0015388089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89243084,0.07917577,0.0047971183,0.016916659,0.005696561,0.0009830294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0384363,0.00078508514,0.0009226394,0.0073990137,0.0033866097,0.014585601,0.0031893055,0.002805367,0.005156853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084762335,0.0012436468,0.0015441475,0.0044585676,0.038444065,0.018064924,0.009633889,0.0050403206,0.0006150851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007660973,0.000007300092,0.00030969636,0.00003261021,0.0000066463654,0.000028461633,0.0011964691,0.0004671428,0.00008213434,0.98911697,0.00015762837,0.00858732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017365868,0.000014122337,0.00023396125,0.00008971556,0.00000882847,0.0000887376,0.0005949606,0.008240791,0.000489419,0.98291147,0.0072931773,0.00001747302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036486972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035404996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0384363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006014803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006105552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20327306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774451565","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00404001","title":"Tribal Courts, Restorative Justice and Native Land Claims","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Restorative justice; Political science; Sovereignty; Federal jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Treaty; Economic Justice; Devolution (biology); Government (linguistics); Eminent domain; Sociology; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.06678477496682644,"score_gpt":0.3497930897305864,"score_spread":0.28300831476376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774451565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5141713,0.014415599,0.0023748828,0.037364833,0.00023197923,0.00003909057,0.000041648582,0.000013806329,0.43134683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580526,0.0009854969,0.00011457591,0.0007479051,0.000069985435,0.0000090245285,0.0000052474006,0.0000020439081,0.0022604193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954731,0.0021768534,0.00016927348,0.0003082098,0.0007163619,0.0011561959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99063474,0.0053497967,0.0017011268,0.00043781436,0.0009647917,0.0009117206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003954513,0.00013011096,0.00028442222,0.0022809317,0.009227304,0.008045744,0.001509982,0.0042499555,0.0057392595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0130332,0.00017866986,0.00026880967,0.0023995293,0.034605872,0.0057134815,0.0053043626,0.0032344041,0.00022536627],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098504415,0.000069195004,0.0038457897,0.000031776366,0.0000062323384,0.00042082253,0.014964471,0.0001953579,0.000049817336,0.9728476,0.0015867356,0.0059722485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035642497,0.00006523199,0.02281745,0.00051995245,0.000028109034,0.00071395456,0.10275198,0.0012177837,0.00022653256,0.8165548,0.055013023,0.00005548487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03418127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049462058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03418127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006114024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005635337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06796461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796901051","doi":"10.1163/22134514-45060016","title":"The Methodology Used to Interpret Customary Land Tenure","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Customary land; Land tenure; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Law; Statutory law; Common law; Indigenous; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Legislation; Land law; Geography","score_opus":0.07231443054933451,"score_gpt":0.3534564155081441,"score_spread":0.2811419849588096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796901051","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042749878,0.0043146005,0.54439294,0.0102560865,0.0024161434,0.0059828614,0.005463959,0.00032378008,0.3840997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32539907,0.005783207,0.53981304,0.006561743,0.00085526553,0.0123147145,0.0034510288,0.00051718927,0.10530478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781713,0.009791913,0.0024889861,0.0030267192,0.0055035404,0.0010176498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832191,0.008746978,0.0020594837,0.0018520575,0.0039237924,0.00019859256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016195485,0.00066496263,0.00085789745,0.007945572,0.0047294847,0.007589827,0.002620805,0.0026789438,0.010358336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03137674,0.000589864,0.001297133,0.00986883,0.01392901,0.0049445615,0.003984847,0.0040304367,0.0029348359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027549975,0.00005587488,0.0053773,0.0005085785,0.000033608656,0.00033101471,0.017044509,0.0005604686,0.0011446859,0.9161065,0.009926054,0.048883803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032307857,0.0001568119,0.012580159,0.0015471689,0.00004180142,0.0010248735,0.015803974,0.002330312,0.0035982225,0.29563332,0.6671375,0.00011360581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013739703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013542509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016195485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006998991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008171356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08565098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122199453","doi":"10.1163/22134514-45060013","title":"Inside the Judicial Mind: Exploring Judicial Methodology in the Mixed Legal System of Quebec","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Jurisdiction; Political science; De facto; Judicial activism; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.19135128603241222,"score_gpt":0.3513547767073328,"score_spread":0.16000349067492056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122199453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82912177,0.00392158,0.012254284,0.02098526,0.00009085647,0.00018765616,0.00019972696,0.000041064228,0.1331978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483126,0.00031073578,0.0015960777,0.00044805903,0.000012572286,0.000028783877,0.000027217977,0.000007596327,0.0027377652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98891526,0.0061535533,0.00021509545,0.00074751413,0.0021928013,0.0017757295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752535,0.013678959,0.002251383,0.00075471634,0.0061888094,0.0018726668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010683996,0.00028735635,0.0003731096,0.0036444385,0.014366405,0.011399333,0.0023260023,0.0016434485,0.0035210801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02198915,0.00032968973,0.0002776408,0.0038870473,0.015586097,0.0032215621,0.003591068,0.0020303107,0.0001406616],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012900266,0.00013708748,0.10145269,0.00022627517,0.00012869865,0.001696296,0.27488208,0.0031035491,0.002629563,0.52791244,0.008108363,0.07959406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010936399,0.00017644174,0.3028068,0.0013019189,0.00015924411,0.00064116565,0.44239336,0.017430384,0.0019861844,0.074108705,0.15862784,0.00025852432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9342633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97572744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09669288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09669288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08697185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70155925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123521668","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00101007","title":"Comparative Legal Scholarship as Ordinary Legal Scholarship","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Value (mathematics); Subject (documents); Law; Comparative law; Sociology; Subject matter; Empirical legal studies; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.061985810628731194,"score_gpt":0.3434962238909628,"score_spread":0.2815104132622316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123521668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05663065,0.08203413,0.074907936,0.16270399,0.0073307254,0.00015954814,0.00012418395,0.00018109025,0.61592776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322827,0.014600795,0.01766124,0.011844123,0.0067036734,0.00026766607,0.00011661546,0.00008792907,0.016435226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97737336,0.016119732,0.0006724307,0.0014046404,0.0035635922,0.00086618005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95685846,0.03106693,0.0017424903,0.00483294,0.0031430614,0.002356036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020535173,0.0005936991,0.0015611479,0.0060524167,0.007315565,0.014873371,0.0025020894,0.0062443004,0.0057352693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028852388,0.00035178772,0.0005234603,0.0054855584,0.0730426,0.020811282,0.010534607,0.00582945,0.0006975736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002183329,0.000006487592,0.00006599829,0.000040164057,0.0000015929413,0.000015656948,0.001641663,0.0000431483,0.000012681052,0.99533087,0.0007446713,0.002094786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051279867,0.000014331191,0.0000914899,0.00022107421,0.000002205656,0.00005108903,0.0021255643,0.00018898572,0.000036568625,0.9419691,0.055290386,0.000003936037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002127954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022859776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020535173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008308821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007665254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10860169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159747714","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10017","title":"Freedom of Thought in Canada: The History of a Forgetting and the Potential of a Remembering","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Charter; Phenomenon; Freedom of thought; Law; Human rights; Scholarship; Political science; Forgetting; Freedom of the press; Freedom of association; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.030290128625064618,"score_gpt":0.2543291883215786,"score_spread":0.22403905969651397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159747714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0997482,0.019111255,0.0059768367,0.21409374,0.0013508509,0.00008181218,0.0007458676,0.00014770735,0.6587438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626539,0.004041716,0.0009637013,0.0066415663,0.00019195369,0.00001807781,0.00008939863,0.00006361884,0.025335945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906865,0.0016086814,0.00028002428,0.0010586506,0.0037539543,0.0026122436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782492,0.008839109,0.0009097975,0.0018361502,0.007273075,0.0028925675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007923509,0.00030870808,0.0007159236,0.0033476828,0.030423807,0.016228888,0.0028881745,0.0041975332,0.013309503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021498304,0.00038696284,0.0005139237,0.004888343,0.06417114,0.0050012544,0.005539413,0.0077333166,0.00044733568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035287667,0.0000142524505,0.0012056695,0.00006559123,0.000008562115,0.00028649974,0.018334838,0.00029585196,0.00007629126,0.93392223,0.021042567,0.024712482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029517812,0.000026905047,0.007527186,0.00086413056,0.000030873012,0.00029915772,0.021368537,0.00078714004,0.00039673937,0.2048006,0.7636978,0.00017146954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98496443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16032031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16032031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18003027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97390944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172109281","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10018","title":"Introduction to a Comparative Study of the Right to Freedom of Thought","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04399751502040146,"score_gpt":0.32629332117035204,"score_spread":0.2822958061499506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172109281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027320143,0.22594947,0.02436986,0.17046584,0.03086443,0.00032512742,0.0019966944,0.00011831866,0.5431783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21890298,0.31332004,0.057450507,0.093292214,0.11931277,0.0028893254,0.0036206162,0.0006711117,0.19054042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635905,0.0021597117,0.00018859521,0.00041950855,0.00070227694,0.00017081304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984721,0.0127298,0.00025281485,0.0005861088,0.0013154313,0.00039470938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005740451,0.00078623067,0.0011485858,0.0055643576,0.003411707,0.0051409258,0.0013983739,0.0043218965,0.044291567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008373704,0.00046807725,0.0015465115,0.006288129,0.008148179,0.008082296,0.003506513,0.008106008,0.0029350163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016355049,0.000035889967,0.0001003601,0.0003390925,0.000012720064,0.000074387935,0.00061413937,0.00019299143,0.000120233584,0.8772586,0.10332974,0.017905507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013443748,0.000042361065,0.0008346322,0.0015172621,0.000011491602,0.00010009347,0.0005338262,0.00017169064,0.00007067962,0.3245592,0.67212534,0.00001992046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050833616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004405288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044291567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005926946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002492505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W424384152","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00101004","title":"Unification of Private Law in Europe and ‘Mixed Jurisdictions’: A Model for Civil Codes in Central Europe","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Commercial law; Law; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Political science; Competition law; Unification; Municipal law; Conflict of laws; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.03611103223499261,"score_gpt":0.2892941634247746,"score_spread":0.253183131189782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W424384152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40075627,0.0022680105,0.055126075,0.011162793,0.00013198546,0.00012503524,0.0000950914,0.00005931297,0.53027546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99188423,0.00015552186,0.0025828097,0.00032990862,0.00001542263,0.00004340359,0.000013886704,0.000006769866,0.0049680453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996051,0.0017637231,0.000095021176,0.00053551944,0.00054635614,0.0010085164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972416,0.0010929041,0.0003173927,0.0004629241,0.00044598183,0.00043905768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041068895,0.00030802636,0.00060301734,0.0029178439,0.005580944,0.013598195,0.001570366,0.0036714328,0.005098297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055461284,0.00036449658,0.0010930877,0.0025831403,0.024197215,0.009391552,0.008208502,0.0023524538,0.00030913574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038504045,0.000004159129,0.00022962279,0.0000025011848,0.0000019619092,0.000024343384,0.0007540492,0.0003796252,0.000017958502,0.9976649,0.00008232096,0.00083465915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000361645,0.00003018598,0.0022841434,0.0001732869,0.000020638754,0.00013955953,0.0046552573,0.007294903,0.00010812768,0.9635704,0.021660956,0.000026292497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058784578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044064466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058784578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013613342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007462914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11688483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310047289","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10043","title":"Penalty Default Rules in French, German and Louisianan Contract Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Default rule; Order (exchange); Bad faith; Incentive; German; Contract theory; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.029045076738159026,"score_gpt":0.23354506689672658,"score_spread":0.20449999015856754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310047289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62234896,0.002911621,0.013217367,0.01570428,0.00010930971,0.00012369604,0.00078481593,0.00012462078,0.34467533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990944,0.0001922525,0.0013336953,0.00080134784,0.000018000363,0.0000321817,0.00009833747,0.000006611961,0.0065735336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478877,0.0015755025,0.00032996968,0.00054539426,0.0013544079,0.0014060598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925557,0.003206712,0.00088722946,0.00055911974,0.002232773,0.0005585806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005226429,0.00016227031,0.00037914215,0.0021986344,0.0052360366,0.0067752167,0.0008436728,0.0024129096,0.004115642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012330896,0.00017977328,0.00046328714,0.0017739303,0.0073175044,0.0020955608,0.0016877772,0.0023128628,0.00026034896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026182677,0.00002575125,0.006647605,0.0000116649235,0.0000082482575,0.00014646008,0.0021706412,0.0011201045,0.00011994948,0.97998583,0.0039757458,0.0057618907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001554007,0.00010075738,0.0979221,0.00045313657,0.00007216136,0.00072629115,0.0101811495,0.023875069,0.0010100363,0.6281237,0.23709424,0.00028598926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38102096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33329147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38102096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022611847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008414032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7576063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390519823","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10066","title":"Rule by Metrics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Harvard University; Brigham Young University; University of Toronto; Yale University","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Argument (complex analysis); Task (project management); Order (exchange); Intervention (counseling); Data science; Computer science; Management science; Political science; Law; Business; Psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05201412681779061,"score_gpt":0.3097679852978599,"score_spread":0.2577538584800693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390519823","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009061188,0.0027748717,0.6893229,0.0172919,0.0012951584,0.00044633856,0.0010758077,0.000836795,0.27789506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5221917,0.004057835,0.39296874,0.0053655496,0.0024256993,0.0015824554,0.0024842676,0.0010260954,0.067897566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96764094,0.01203734,0.0033976005,0.008112565,0.0075358967,0.0012756528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95268613,0.021730894,0.0032318793,0.01420542,0.0069143805,0.0012312828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01647061,0.0012360557,0.0019807064,0.003469904,0.0030456681,0.014006281,0.003123368,0.00428331,0.016142147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06394271,0.0006529706,0.0020855593,0.0036609995,0.01532085,0.014013895,0.006113882,0.0057383645,0.0053664614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000787806,0.000011164163,0.00038955518,0.000054455908,0.000018500321,0.00003932057,0.00014891215,0.001737662,0.000075121636,0.9780617,0.004414392,0.015041396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008083984,0.000012721336,0.00011406111,0.00005664616,0.000010321248,0.000054366104,0.00005881355,0.004206313,0.0001440022,0.9620431,0.033278666,0.0000129004775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003648191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026657218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01647061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004054792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00475769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08710593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392109082","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10068","title":"Investment in Infrastructure: A Comparative Study of the Regulation of Online Single Submission in Indonesia, Canada, and New Zealand","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indonesian; Investment (military); Bureaucracy; Government (linguistics); Business; Statutory law; Normative; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027856366371592754,"score_gpt":0.2716685645830257,"score_spread":0.24381219821143293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392109082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98682004,0.00015605845,0.00006076108,0.0005227216,0.0000042002584,0.000036418092,0.00010435487,0.0000022744687,0.012293018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982064,0.00021000934,0.00006151582,0.00006862017,0.0000013965191,0.000013874794,0.00006733697,0.0000037317725,0.0013671453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970095,0.0003368641,0.000099626035,0.00026487326,0.0012048826,0.0010842024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99295604,0.0014210211,0.0018103379,0.00022865128,0.0021258432,0.0014581092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001843375,0.0001964417,0.00049505226,0.0028107986,0.0065995376,0.004714374,0.0012108842,0.0006616867,0.0034309179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007179566,0.0002872008,0.00027012583,0.005222917,0.005879622,0.0016763493,0.0021150582,0.0015995785,0.0001523716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000314293,0.0007847287,0.53899866,0.0003997266,0.00012065922,0.0031536832,0.36325115,0.00086541474,0.0026475985,0.047895037,0.004883034,0.036685944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001504837,0.000064990585,0.6686116,0.00017448634,0.00004077982,0.00018841102,0.31482518,0.00076501456,0.0003107783,0.0004697184,0.014465297,0.00006872299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98344433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99171877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07220499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07220499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06948553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5238863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404128434","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10076","title":"The Legal Landscape of Freedom of Association in Canada: The Complex Path to Half of a Constitutional Freedom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Path (computing); Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Association (psychology); Political science; Law; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Human rights; Physics","score_opus":0.029891789065787402,"score_gpt":0.27627924826424166,"score_spread":0.24638745919845426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404128434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17877269,0.009950572,0.00939967,0.17931831,0.00043280516,0.000073076495,0.00046665125,0.000080019156,0.62150615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845589,0.0014084503,0.0013105215,0.0033958596,0.00004905086,0.000014935149,0.00004853704,0.000027898646,0.009185975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900899,0.0020050693,0.00021236617,0.0010210325,0.0037274712,0.002944233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873269,0.0039854986,0.0005070839,0.0007896392,0.0042931815,0.0030976967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006067113,0.00023361939,0.00063549733,0.0027130598,0.031222297,0.020600304,0.0023025495,0.0031626746,0.007520846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01095364,0.0004050566,0.00046340152,0.003925142,0.059711214,0.00521135,0.0066382065,0.0063953614,0.00023323791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010070921,0.0000073189995,0.00094692904,0.000020757217,0.000006684903,0.00008925113,0.00804758,0.0003278467,0.00010882852,0.9769712,0.0059633283,0.0075002257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023624858,0.000023907807,0.014846446,0.0006199866,0.00003728189,0.00016214389,0.046140175,0.0020263349,0.00038040223,0.5429013,0.39264187,0.0001966226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98281556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98962563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16927959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16927959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19529189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9635179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415134675","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10106","title":"Comparative Analysis of Individual Case Reviews in Assisted Dying Oversight Systems Internationally","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); State (computer science); Retrospective cohort study; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.34826095365790144,"score_gpt":0.4340181675431241,"score_spread":0.08575721388522267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415134675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76328224,0.044922873,0.021021832,0.0082712015,0.00039173552,0.0032578304,0.002371466,0.00014376573,0.15633708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98564297,0.0035454184,0.006092143,0.00068467297,0.00014948664,0.00079257746,0.00044092193,0.00003248241,0.0026193236],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.68235,0.24841134,0.020460805,0.0085163,0.031942073,0.008319547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26404756,0.49471623,0.120823674,0.021026352,0.09334354,0.006042683],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19448227,0.0003049492,0.0011526401,0.01504831,0.0018243273,0.008158429,0.002457327,0.001689126,0.005374018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42896825,0.0005443619,0.0011691276,0.01465654,0.0032785716,0.0039876658,0.0046232822,0.0015761842,0.0003512825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026946904,0.0006664333,0.35987663,0.008281566,0.0037839357,0.0015879219,0.067081705,0.015120111,0.0017735246,0.2550103,0.017497884,0.26662526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000604019,0.0035409736,0.6830274,0.013888714,0.0033571657,0.0033436771,0.0825212,0.010986207,0.0044301255,0.03690198,0.15690579,0.00049269875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012131039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02476796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19448227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014936641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012963558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99334675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}