{"meta":{"query_hash":"07f7f71a8707","filters":{"venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/07f7f71a8707","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Journal+of+Comparative+Law+and+Governance"},"results":[{"id":"W1529929387","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00101006","title":"Double Reasoning in the Codified Mixed Systems – Code and Case Law as Simultaneous Methods","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Jurisprudence; Law; Tort; Syllogism; Jurisdiction; Causation; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy of law; Terminology; Correctness; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Liability; Linguistics; Philosophy; Algorithm","score_opus":0.058273377018420114,"score_gpt":0.3064186016921694,"score_spread":0.24814522467374928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529929387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6119161,0.0024398512,0.0033180637,0.0010122886,0.0006376326,0.0002886682,0.0000072598664,0.000014577626,0.38036552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685234,0.000056876954,0.00071063166,0.001557821,0.0005220446,0.0000017718005,0.0000010646897,0.000010748012,0.00028668848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893874,0.00019078652,0.00039693894,0.00013135969,0.00019974943,0.00014244478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987783,0.00036049084,0.0005363193,0.000093164555,0.00021112482,0.00002062244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009781139,0.00013406621,0.00025773633,0.00002249797,0.0001644894,0.0005596065,0.00020758834,0.000015096767,0.000020334617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006660839,0.000089005756,0.00003574661,0.0000740411,0.0002487989,0.00069348945,0.000057036475,0.00020939248,0.00002524723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009315213,0.000040516235,0.00015420791,0.00003342379,0.000032211618,0.0011356606,0.0004990088,0.0007798903,0.000078001445,0.99510264,0.0017447734,0.00030650484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005785197,0.00026865618,0.009842253,0.0006012385,0.0001225111,0.0049798773,0.0042412463,0.040125232,0.00018842166,0.011006294,0.9222081,0.00063101284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015777769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032290185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98409635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014855483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000066214134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5396298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774451565","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00404001","title":"Tribal Courts, Restorative Justice and Native Land Claims","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Restorative justice; Political science; Sovereignty; Federal jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Treaty; Economic Justice; Devolution (biology); Government (linguistics); Eminent domain; Sociology; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.06678477496682644,"score_gpt":0.3497930897305864,"score_spread":0.28300831476376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774451565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7641539,0.0040131127,0.00009463097,0.005005984,0.0004540005,0.00014436955,0.000026651063,0.00000930589,0.22609806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960526,0.001425223,0.00035281814,0.00020829309,0.0005433946,5.417495e-7,2.2335274e-7,0.000005697558,0.0014111742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843967,0.0006142275,0.00025810482,0.00014163906,0.00036266356,0.00018368743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982546,0.00023286161,0.00089824083,0.00009001992,0.00037520257,0.00014906884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008935844,0.00013599246,0.0003262843,0.000007742092,0.0021985471,0.00030635984,0.00028565302,0.000021548161,0.00001278546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022619608,0.00009742556,0.00004724409,0.00002791669,0.001489045,0.0007400864,0.000100838435,0.00026807305,0.000006711266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005182316,0.00010559227,0.00873403,0.000038638118,0.00030902118,0.00029131467,0.16535664,0.000017749346,0.0001388959,0.8027254,0.019366914,0.0023976034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018308731,0.00037832645,0.49171066,0.00021009028,0.00012801873,0.000014046789,0.009013514,0.000016422367,0.0001002437,0.0019250021,0.4943958,0.0002769949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035291526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012394504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8008004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006664184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003966478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796901051","doi":"10.1163/22134514-45060016","title":"The Methodology Used to Interpret Customary Land Tenure","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Customary land; Land tenure; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Law; Statutory law; Common law; Indigenous; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Legislation; Land law; Geography","score_opus":0.07231443054933451,"score_gpt":0.3534564155081441,"score_spread":0.2811419849588096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796901051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41313317,0.0066830097,0.0021607599,0.012466467,0.0010962425,0.0002930595,0.000009145835,0.000021201638,0.5641369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945503,0.000095450065,0.0019113272,0.0010372787,0.00036793345,0.0000011872352,7.217537e-8,0.0000071879995,0.0020292555],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997234,0.0019203342,0.00027567355,0.000099344594,0.00027081874,0.00019985031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984397,0.00084985874,0.00023236274,0.000115090676,0.00020022684,0.00016275288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015550554,0.00008965359,0.00021910618,0.000010698444,0.00036384395,0.00016538314,0.00038696761,0.000016202894,0.000059487807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022903417,0.000054583663,0.00005011038,0.00010839859,0.00046514673,0.00026793074,0.000083438616,0.00024285611,0.00013490616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023712737,0.000051426756,0.003576673,0.000005791713,0.00013439945,0.00012976001,0.45282716,0.000041070743,0.0005802515,0.4131436,0.12203842,0.0072342977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002262269,0.000174605,0.011220962,0.000040177707,0.000008580404,0.000009262898,0.0018108311,0.0000043836544,0.00009349893,0.0018690597,0.98445874,0.00008366691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022385968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005029391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8624203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029350864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003530147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27984303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122199453","doi":"10.1163/22134514-45060013","title":"Inside the Judicial Mind: Exploring Judicial Methodology in the Mixed Legal System of Quebec","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Jurisdiction; Political science; De facto; Judicial activism; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.19135128603241222,"score_gpt":0.3513547767073328,"score_spread":0.16000349067492056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122199453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87228394,0.0011923667,0.0002895667,0.00248764,0.0004690781,0.00014961629,0.0000037870693,0.0000024555673,0.123121575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864316,0.00012722047,0.00020339564,0.0002769076,0.00059782725,0.0000049759315,1.559995e-7,0.00000411204,0.0001422594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583703,0.0029587161,0.0005169045,0.00010255805,0.00042243992,0.00016236553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793005,0.0010259142,0.000627307,0.000083442224,0.00029739365,0.000035886558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022425489,0.000107660744,0.0003553644,0.000024498324,0.0003190066,0.00007376891,0.00044275692,0.000012191574,0.00002117151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106302476,0.00006110143,0.000085755666,0.00014318716,0.0007042018,0.0004553615,0.00006106846,0.00025297917,0.000012826852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007914405,0.00003568169,0.0005360272,0.0000043447903,0.000059372764,0.000022905802,0.034584418,0.000046505887,0.00018418762,0.9602145,0.0029306638,0.0013022677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010019267,0.00042561934,0.40441996,0.00032562407,0.000047285306,0.00003883841,0.062742874,0.000042628097,0.0010304765,0.0030837809,0.5266309,0.00021013935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017212242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052913953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9571307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056537436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007462103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123521668","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00101007","title":"Comparative Legal Scholarship as Ordinary Legal Scholarship","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Value (mathematics); Subject (documents); Law; Comparative law; Sociology; Subject matter; Empirical legal studies; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.061985810628731194,"score_gpt":0.3434962238909628,"score_spread":0.2815104132622316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123521668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58728445,0.0024895153,0.000068505164,0.0035776908,0.00031756223,0.00016018799,0.000007941192,0.00001563145,0.40607855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910157,0.0003455521,0.00058137364,0.0012624173,0.0006949682,0.0000042280894,0.0000013342425,0.000013736624,0.006080693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629635,0.0015804664,0.00064587593,0.00027057226,0.0008379966,0.00036872595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730796,0.00037056845,0.00076986104,0.00014470326,0.0011147149,0.0002921698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012838218,0.00027617652,0.0006163846,0.000051158317,0.00090975163,0.0006224265,0.00061481044,0.000032384774,0.00045547725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012234326,0.00023019637,0.00016828525,0.00022140935,0.0009787536,0.0032711485,0.00014379062,0.0007079744,0.0005401552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016184963,0.00012527141,0.0017345102,0.000005123905,0.00017957132,0.00009786236,0.0049413494,0.000018899218,0.00046210375,0.9780731,0.01377529,0.0004250561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083450257,0.00060740445,0.11983214,0.0001922153,0.000028112776,0.00006738779,0.0020426991,0.000008676067,0.00079980976,0.0074643604,0.8678208,0.00030188498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008137671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007695448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9706088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012441415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017266333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93871355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159747714","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10017","title":"Freedom of Thought in Canada: The History of a Forgetting and the Potential of a Remembering","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Charter; Phenomenon; Freedom of thought; Law; Human rights; Scholarship; Political science; Forgetting; Freedom of the press; Freedom of association; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.030290128625064618,"score_gpt":0.2543291883215786,"score_spread":0.22403905969651397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159747714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9378348,0.020047652,0.000105389845,0.0020482144,0.00029304862,0.00005467845,0.0000046427454,5.6182e-7,0.03961101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987129,0.0006493116,0.00015985368,0.000076933684,0.00006739387,1.2520907e-7,3.414465e-8,0.0000023861676,0.0003310871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860615,0.00060195074,0.0003665437,0.000057110345,0.00028476998,0.00008346551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998788,0.00029131476,0.00064902805,0.00006920967,0.00017480063,0.000027651486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012076778,0.000050060957,0.00024642562,0.000005535849,0.000065862594,0.0000070964747,0.00016625666,0.0000056931535,0.000009227652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104444385,0.000030642215,0.0000431723,0.00006708293,0.000660168,0.00010945556,0.0000510135,0.00012589383,4.2738126e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009162108,0.00007154369,0.0052883932,0.000155422,0.00012315498,0.00024083833,0.07699135,0.0010982633,0.0066968976,0.89830166,0.007898319,0.0022179668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050721588,0.00030668624,0.32579544,0.002732504,0.00022366035,0.00016192807,0.055955626,0.0007392669,0.0046939324,0.0027178514,0.60123026,0.00037068405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17716089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5986085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8955838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007927476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005340821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8283185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172109281","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10018","title":"Introduction to a Comparative Study of the Right to Freedom of Thought","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04399751502040146,"score_gpt":0.32629332117035204,"score_spread":0.2822958061499506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172109281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95914656,0.0004641997,0.00026212726,0.0062835454,0.00047358705,0.00018052975,0.0000087048675,0.0000024021024,0.033178344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974958,0.000029391686,0.00050864095,0.00016560138,0.00058818044,6.153183e-7,8.425072e-8,0.0000038331154,0.0012079114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767256,0.0011163618,0.0004411461,0.0001491827,0.0004983585,0.00012238136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984361,0.00014084092,0.0005153714,0.00017262505,0.0006281698,0.00010690453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084732205,0.00009405807,0.00036905386,0.000015830414,0.00021955525,0.000036760986,0.00032788212,0.000009052135,0.00005594796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009737796,0.00006448094,0.00006872579,0.00036791406,0.00024963243,0.00020230089,0.000102947364,0.00014879978,0.000007734644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091340754,0.0011921402,0.0026405775,0.000033836903,0.00021725992,0.00008986413,0.3085543,0.0029625706,0.012254156,0.5782486,0.09238222,0.00051107846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077633787,0.0014413699,0.09976646,0.00030536536,0.00008151783,0.00002282427,0.029943807,0.000005518314,0.017260442,0.00035189601,0.8498688,0.00017569716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002107968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040709684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7574865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032846798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007763783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26294565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W424384152","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00101004","title":"Unification of Private Law in Europe and ‘Mixed Jurisdictions’: A Model for Civil Codes in Central Europe","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Commercial law; Law; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Political science; Competition law; Unification; Municipal law; Conflict of laws; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.03611103223499261,"score_gpt":0.2892941634247746,"score_spread":0.253183131189782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W424384152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81711406,0.0006092373,0.001810297,0.0007142577,0.00010441964,0.00024298167,0.000022398915,0.0000059721588,0.1793764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973869,0.00095797546,0.00062399043,0.0002806386,0.00007430743,0.0000015528552,0.0000012929606,0.000011246348,0.00066214794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983786,0.0005767096,0.0005212988,0.00013426536,0.0002123162,0.00017682396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877197,0.00014762042,0.0004922543,0.00006948703,0.00042866156,0.00009000684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083766505,0.00010298234,0.0002421813,0.00003756074,0.00010113313,0.00007953404,0.00020380196,0.0000137657,0.000010588659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089201494,0.00009100785,0.00003162029,0.00017255533,0.0003775601,0.00061788736,0.000032828404,0.0001692824,0.0000039487745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009143638,0.0000852657,0.0011692529,0.000009863117,0.000012765577,0.0000067250776,0.00402527,0.00071925274,0.0012288374,0.9921852,0.00024804182,0.00021811118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035913773,0.0005084712,0.56099194,0.00057648227,0.000026973023,0.000010335565,0.00039369415,0.016777327,0.0008135458,0.0065382086,0.40938658,0.00038504708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001807333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016420041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98564696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003065614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053014417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37111926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310047289","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10043","title":"Penalty Default Rules in French, German and Louisianan Contract Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Default rule; Order (exchange); Bad faith; Incentive; German; Contract theory; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.029045076738159026,"score_gpt":0.23354506689672658,"score_spread":0.20449999015856754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310047289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7682522,0.011006546,0.000105659354,0.00036389785,0.00039180368,0.000106030675,0.00019302772,0.0000049941045,0.21957584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981743,0.00042022672,0.000091577385,0.00089739484,0.00020596154,0.0000020425243,0.0000025724962,0.000016741691,0.00018919051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983409,0.00017525,0.00095839653,0.000244816,0.000062584644,0.00021806925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844426,0.000075175274,0.0011992794,0.00013534013,0.00003014895,0.000115787196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012099231,0.00013946838,0.00064585777,0.000049703493,0.0002321024,0.000102159574,0.00024288574,0.000017020735,0.00013440913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010649041,0.00016954067,0.0000820035,0.00006805452,0.00023988815,0.0003610778,0.000102526974,0.00032787133,0.000034135206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057312944,0.00007016163,0.012319684,0.000011381675,0.00004711937,0.00010128946,0.0020321612,0.00011421026,0.000013504318,0.9839769,0.0011050035,0.00015129073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029211312,0.0005508886,0.33542967,0.00007343575,0.000010349774,0.00021343499,0.0002295299,0.0005178236,0.00003140739,0.07163669,0.58794785,0.0004377537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012910839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090760057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91234016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009413396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015736949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6913668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390519823","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10066","title":"Rule by Metrics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Harvard University; Brigham Young University; University of Toronto; Yale University","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Argument (complex analysis); Task (project management); Order (exchange); Intervention (counseling); Data science; Computer science; Management science; Political science; Law; Business; Psychology; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05201412681779061,"score_gpt":0.3097679852978599,"score_spread":0.2577538584800693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390519823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27035707,0.005960217,0.00024168946,0.0028313843,0.00037729152,0.000040769402,0.000021825503,0.000019335375,0.7201504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621654,0.0020139106,0.000056361525,0.00034689033,0.00024712895,1.8246634e-7,3.5913766e-7,0.000002381388,0.0011162522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999149,0.00021231454,0.00016431989,0.000059785616,0.0002953172,0.00011922572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947935,0.00011690302,0.00018474109,0.000026026652,0.00012379918,0.000069159134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006644061,0.000052913107,0.0001399944,0.000015004142,0.00041361776,0.00004040691,0.00012756948,0.0000069449493,0.000018484252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050004783,0.00004255218,0.000038132952,0.00028785423,0.00043082336,0.00015618776,0.000033318935,0.000091344824,0.000072219686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000187739,0.000018854576,0.0010673256,0.0000011999495,0.00003345549,0.000043174095,0.002760735,0.00000732171,0.00008405147,0.9073732,0.087315805,0.0012761278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019808495,0.000053999825,0.020894716,0.000024035387,0.000007669866,0.0000024525052,0.00082500826,0.0000022249912,0.00006229198,0.0066935867,0.9711733,0.00006262255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017481358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010895223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020436899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035472818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31812552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392109082","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10068","title":"Investment in Infrastructure: A Comparative Study of the Regulation of Online Single Submission in Indonesia, Canada, and New Zealand","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indonesian; Investment (military); Bureaucracy; Government (linguistics); Business; Statutory law; Normative; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027856366371592754,"score_gpt":0.2716685645830257,"score_spread":0.24381219821143293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392109082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995455,0.0018262962,0.000002362609,0.0005719411,0.0001301389,0.00014274582,0.0000056717727,0.0000010931514,0.0018647126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995531,0.000041431136,0.000029154124,0.000044315577,0.00006248783,1.8306807e-7,1.6885099e-7,0.0000029512703,0.00026624367],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861777,0.0005180546,0.00038702114,0.00009094226,0.00029860015,0.00008758928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999435,0.000078864854,0.00032362522,0.00004913627,0.00006582948,0.000047521797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031865886,0.000084777224,0.00028355396,0.000029604706,0.000072008246,0.00001785388,0.00010116358,0.000012111539,0.000002516649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008823443,0.000052798827,0.000020020405,0.0002352113,0.0002489831,0.00013626614,0.000038831433,0.00015482206,3.7791004e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055004185,0.00062390446,0.48755085,0.00008579599,0.00017639266,0.0000965573,0.43771017,0.0022409447,0.0034170635,0.059301864,0.0064799516,0.0017664614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000716936,0.00024855757,0.98459023,0.0003503134,0.000010880954,0.0000035382407,0.005594084,0.00003180215,0.000275924,0.00046465397,0.0076575694,0.000055536202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051821098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65455973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6027387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007780126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025393098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9544929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404128434","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10076","title":"The Legal Landscape of Freedom of Association in Canada: The Complex Path to Half of a Constitutional Freedom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Path (computing); Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Association (psychology); Political science; Law; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Human rights; Physics","score_opus":0.029891789065787402,"score_gpt":0.27627924826424166,"score_spread":0.24638745919845426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404128434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8929706,0.008813236,0.00016358825,0.014398389,0.0007346128,0.00026040207,0.00018940741,0.0000038097749,0.082465924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927974,0.00024461822,0.00010992163,0.000051087998,0.00012723729,5.3453397e-7,3.3448586e-7,0.000002008832,0.00018451472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983716,0.00047666012,0.0004251457,0.00006537694,0.0005418748,0.00011934778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840677,0.00068176433,0.0005113872,0.000046143545,0.0003147231,0.000039221784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011021832,0.000070242386,0.00025245696,0.000008071053,0.00020673526,0.00003369588,0.00022664804,0.000009562827,0.000013402193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016773365,0.00003803444,0.000057180154,0.00016191977,0.0006627132,0.00011957381,0.000043662087,0.00015787342,8.191889e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077477685,0.00002621642,0.012281745,0.000019039124,0.00014730799,0.000015634043,0.015229749,0.0012522262,0.00030640367,0.94860095,0.021864135,0.00017914241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005348113,0.00012428241,0.52125007,0.000361849,0.00003224683,0.0000035904081,0.008562466,0.00029167754,0.00009629463,0.00020916393,0.46843392,0.00009961156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27734593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71566546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94839174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020868574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004037168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7274663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415134675","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10106","title":"Comparative Analysis of Individual Case Reviews in Assisted Dying Oversight Systems Internationally","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); State (computer science); Retrospective cohort study; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.34826095365790144,"score_gpt":0.4340181675431241,"score_spread":0.08575721388522267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415134675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8592056,0.044118106,0.008854354,0.001955511,0.00067003554,0.0005121524,0.0003604441,0.000006863516,0.08431693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997088,0.00041307393,0.0007870536,0.0012960049,0.00006182975,0.0000038025942,0.00000764885,0.00000555348,0.00033702896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935721,0.0014447814,0.0044262456,0.0002586221,0.00013561615,0.00016260259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284923,0.0008792159,0.005810283,0.00020002776,0.00018012025,0.00008111819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011868646,0.00017256135,0.0019433777,0.0004358855,0.00008913865,0.00008876216,0.0003115161,0.000030924697,0.00004110425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027387426,0.00018052348,0.00018282872,0.00061810226,0.00012692863,0.00048196988,0.000068450245,0.00024548557,0.000024509327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013019082,0.00028659304,0.030812437,0.0003356864,0.0025848714,0.00016519085,0.013785213,0.0061258576,0.000020785521,0.9311163,0.0144976275,0.00013925643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037427072,0.0003219108,0.74267954,0.0021399208,0.00039652362,0.00019076635,0.004201149,0.012391271,0.000029940502,0.0011961308,0.23216,0.0005501167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021805453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005083806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92992014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023516674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006837179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73615336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}