{"meta":{"query_hash":"efbe682c081c","filters":{"venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management"},"cohort_total":20,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":20,"exported":20,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/efbe682c081c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Journal+of+Innovation+Management"},"results":[{"id":"W1939701833","doi":"10.1108/14601060810911156","title":"Measuring innovation culture in organizations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":554,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Organizational culture; Originality; Construct (python library); Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Creativity; Marketing; Value (mathematics); Innovation management; Exploratory factor analysis; Scale (ratio); Business; Market orientation; Computer science; Management; Psychology; Economics; Service (business)","score_opus":0.043965292425877656,"score_gpt":0.2203231939532401,"score_spread":0.17635790152736244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1939701833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12704322,0.00004027652,0.024377057,0.0014141895,0.0010798039,0.0003671301,5.3969893e-7,0.00009833857,0.84557945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989801,0.000026123194,0.003105117,0.0036223049,0.00095765316,0.0000029483017,0.00003928865,0.000044506745,0.002401096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743277,0.000046053305,0.001591749,0.00019285906,0.0005162586,0.00022033602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953171,0.000006403088,0.0012206769,0.00020765068,0.00324148,0.0000066614843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022729852,0.00019235429,0.00020267561,0.00381073,0.0002149922,0.00014903522,0.00038814332,0.000023778839,0.00013141977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034001414,0.00018170063,0.000031275762,0.015257556,0.000042726548,0.0010795866,0.00019782089,0.00025466445,0.00037738628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003812916,0.00022407806,0.010628248,0.00013431507,0.000068853,0.00033735807,0.00029728792,0.0003462833,0.00065429375,0.9475696,0.030717269,0.008984252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004583626,0.00006811328,0.13284959,0.00038432176,0.00006686685,0.000059478185,0.0023567465,0.000560668,0.00027035776,0.004581106,0.8535308,0.0006882763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000017605784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019923482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9429885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110501875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025186266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7409537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1949772233","doi":"10.1108/14601061311324520","title":"The organisation of innovation in the wine industry","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Originality; Open innovation; Business; Marketing; Industrial organization; Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Dimension (graph theory); Innovation management; Winery; Descriptive statistics; Wine; Creativity; Computer science","score_opus":0.02546432393174034,"score_gpt":0.22706833029661913,"score_spread":0.2016040063648788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1949772233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8909069,0.000010636877,0.0016446974,0.040071104,0.0004547024,0.00035666503,2.597093e-7,0.000013479882,0.066541605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940201,0.000002363679,0.0002234897,0.0024737392,0.0027399238,0.000003103515,0.000010013751,0.000014717028,0.000512547],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980097,0.00007899968,0.0013053002,0.00008149658,0.00039224562,0.00013226931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972227,0.000037405294,0.0015903668,0.00019608208,0.00095043133,0.0000029836954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004369601,0.00010281985,0.000101712954,0.00064839295,0.00013184622,0.00024293578,0.00045641235,0.00003194944,0.00013959936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028986606,0.00006160464,0.00002028479,0.0036366633,0.000046598336,0.0009115681,0.00009427524,0.0004364779,0.0001076915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005992321,0.00026720017,0.021493273,0.0001312481,0.00013030188,0.00008179645,0.0003792427,0.00076791685,0.0015717022,0.27131167,0.60011786,0.10368785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010080406,0.00004188067,0.5163767,0.00011764283,0.000032400138,0.000009131175,0.003372022,0.0001701476,0.00012822294,0.006031661,0.47257864,0.00013354699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011165966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.481356e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4948834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022824092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000134934935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2512164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102778553","doi":"10.1108/14601060610639999","title":"Engineering change request management in a new product development process","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Product Development and Customization","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Rework; Computer science; Process (computing); New product development; Product (mathematics); Process management; Industrial engineering; Manufacturing engineering; Engineering; Marketing; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023076506134793482,"score_gpt":0.2100551309260984,"score_spread":0.18697862479130492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102778553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58739555,0.00061356043,0.05378298,0.0078118313,0.0036669858,0.0032746154,5.796365e-7,0.00045994562,0.34299394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974409,0.000022709028,0.018876037,0.0009904266,0.0028007315,0.000016635306,0.000052753996,0.00006946283,0.002762232],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977457,0.00001779237,0.0012003636,0.0002673886,0.0004888836,0.00027989014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986503,0.0000032496428,0.0007857041,0.0001706932,0.00037920667,0.000010829329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019832335,0.00022140521,0.00019116816,0.00198108,0.00007375029,0.00021508735,0.00036349936,0.000013525157,0.00005435679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036839025,0.00021502459,0.000027047101,0.0029538132,0.000010233895,0.0013995803,0.00014351222,0.00014727148,0.00015157752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025929158,0.0006986706,0.02683482,0.002066377,0.0003219442,0.0013467035,0.0006724625,0.006998315,0.00042973913,0.22206266,0.051408663,0.6869004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002330565,0.0000132692285,0.32974303,0.00058927585,0.00005487634,0.0000111110685,0.00020289615,0.0002833955,0.0003490429,0.0009519229,0.66494507,0.00052555633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000066517623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000045761194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6863748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001223178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029637653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8768448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169752840","doi":"10.1108/14601060510610153","title":"An empirical study of university spin‐off development","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Mentorship; Marketing; Business; Process (computing); Originality; Service (business); Promotion (chess); Empirical research; Value (mathematics); Industrial organization; Knowledge management; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.03583109512003506,"score_gpt":0.26848033845825925,"score_spread":0.23264924333822418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169752840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756718,0.000020507961,0.0008059446,0.0005964103,0.00014515105,0.0001278298,1.391384e-7,0.000017965,0.022614224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678355,0.000013716412,0.0018690401,0.00076033425,0.00039174975,1.6927338e-7,0.000001974466,0.000010099017,0.00016936574],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986572,0.00006134988,0.0006921412,0.00013101855,0.00034075475,0.00011753275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984447,0.000007955542,0.00082149904,0.0001453203,0.00057172356,0.000008841344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015304141,0.000104561084,0.00014878747,0.0005943879,0.00012569822,0.000063567284,0.00035238854,0.000007204636,0.00007703411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003009902,0.000091509195,0.000025950361,0.0010264396,0.000024580697,0.0008177405,0.00016850933,0.00008821041,0.000046731973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003648872,0.003172709,0.45770282,0.00013128397,0.00048562142,0.0002900714,0.001962971,0.0053351214,0.00020018125,0.008123496,0.018846981,0.5033839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010600627,0.0001519522,0.568185,0.000045553676,0.000046412257,0.0000010809354,0.0056723743,0.000059337915,0.000026453343,0.000011850141,0.42462838,0.00011158982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000028052496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007197151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5032723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003688023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009051958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37316367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336879902","doi":"10.1108/ejim-12-2014-0119","title":"Effectuation, innovation and performance in SMEs: an empirical study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Product innovation; Service innovation; Business; Explication; Structural equation modeling; New product development; Industrial organization; Sample (material); Product (mathematics); Service (business); Marketing; Scale (ratio); Construct (python library); Entrepreneurial orientation; Computer science; Entrepreneurship","score_opus":0.03395203151726182,"score_gpt":0.27568460586849,"score_spread":0.24173257435122816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336879902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99205124,0.000014853404,0.0010153741,0.0013802145,0.00019711288,0.00021089986,1.3920709e-7,0.000018022594,0.005112163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814403,0.000027606306,0.00020676575,0.0011843885,0.00034606527,0.0000029612906,0.0000016513228,0.000012890354,0.00007365896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853003,0.00006540575,0.00083681784,0.00016173543,0.00027822415,0.0001277789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986459,0.000022280665,0.0006239415,0.00012498324,0.0005776252,0.00000526531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028085504,0.00011486055,0.00013708333,0.0010875156,0.000087956745,0.00012469746,0.00017036615,0.000008831432,0.000033036777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017297077,0.00007525886,0.000010946079,0.0018932237,0.000033691944,0.0015309073,0.000120797326,0.00007654696,0.000029346544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006855472,0.000148861,0.82599026,0.000042276213,0.000028226092,0.000027553377,0.00017610002,0.000043141747,0.00009331803,0.0036291205,0.0006777976,0.16907479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014077574,0.00022211508,0.98435706,0.00013415808,0.0000178002,0.0000019364002,0.000713246,0.00005626383,0.000010283272,0.0002555604,0.01271783,0.00010599035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000019045222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028727572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1689688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027698978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005032372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30689672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522788709","doi":"10.1108/ejim-08-2015-0069","title":"Feature fit","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Congruence (geometry); Feature (linguistics); Originality; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.043648260434182545,"score_gpt":0.2502456982113159,"score_spread":0.20659743777713338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522788709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8693764,0.00012162109,0.023706937,0.03336467,0.0031050579,0.00034386228,0.0000024527644,0.00014547625,0.069833495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98812485,0.00004038522,0.0007565339,0.0013693732,0.00068170123,0.0000016096313,0.0000041742164,0.000020987802,0.009000388],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990088,0.0000247162,0.0004660407,0.00011416408,0.0002778579,0.00010845606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984282,0.000008859463,0.0007072425,0.00017418325,0.00067444326,0.000007023103],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011306843,0.000095440926,0.000092225026,0.0007094524,0.000081175895,0.00018292785,0.0002609388,0.000011208478,0.0004835415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006699951,0.00006452246,0.000048214395,0.00079557026,0.000028822184,0.0008473601,0.0000779178,0.000071973205,0.00096078834],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035941528,0.000044056273,0.002795933,0.000030438234,0.000034272958,0.00004353405,0.000006014147,0.000001452772,0.0030770835,0.025359845,0.11497425,0.85359716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007793943,0.0000031390202,0.28613734,0.00009511347,0.000040261013,0.0000057974135,0.000037982918,0.0000026493842,0.00005769774,0.0002631516,0.7124901,0.0000874073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.101049e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.845137e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8535098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026200114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005179791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523213871","doi":"10.1108/ejim-01-2016-0010","title":"Managing multiple logics in partnerships for scaling social innovation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Social innovation; Originality; Knowledge management; Innovation management; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Mathematics; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.08363936938840769,"score_gpt":0.2577188665469909,"score_spread":0.1740794971585832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523213871","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16795337,0.00005697114,0.7464946,0.02552224,0.001184622,0.00086700625,0.000003044979,0.00011550389,0.057802673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920848,0.000020750078,0.0035756694,0.0022159591,0.0013723234,0.000006078651,0.000019276276,0.00003685898,0.0006682839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808574,0.000032845954,0.0011175046,0.00018490209,0.00034432206,0.00023467641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978036,0.00005019729,0.0010781777,0.000090780726,0.000972759,0.000004429142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029987895,0.00016135939,0.00018868477,0.0016330237,0.00021142795,0.00016044287,0.00028652916,0.000017491577,0.00006142298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000357735,0.00012341025,0.00004428929,0.00293374,0.00003762403,0.0009110689,0.00019730184,0.00007834729,0.000051381347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001637795,0.00010261806,0.03159189,0.0002651716,0.0001155214,0.000040378585,0.00007369579,0.00016834629,0.00054862304,0.82161325,0.028715018,0.1166017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0083932765,0.000063974374,0.29808182,0.0005476921,0.00013112162,0.0000022936129,0.0015078556,0.00085227494,0.00016880162,0.06561099,0.6239468,0.000693129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.131863e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031387374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8241314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008004079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000059852023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50325245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625077166","doi":"10.1108/ejim-03-2016-0037","title":"How rumors and preannouncements foster curiosity toward products","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Originality; Product (mathematics); Rumor; Value (mathematics); Ambiguity; Marketing; Business; Set (abstract data type); Advertising; Psychology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Economics; Computer science; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.08120180559809434,"score_gpt":0.3142719911392735,"score_spread":0.23307018554117917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625077166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4040359,0.000040338393,0.00462519,0.07326701,0.0011647298,0.00041644566,0.0000026440557,0.000025682079,0.5164221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99027634,0.00012583823,0.0014552795,0.0009430612,0.0002610872,1.4652089e-7,0.0000016467939,0.000006042389,0.0069305617],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887216,0.00012718703,0.00033999165,0.00007487949,0.00044767716,0.00013807818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982774,0.0000050056233,0.000932446,0.00017817577,0.0005523857,0.000054584125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030574182,0.00006962767,0.000085182124,0.00019274898,0.00056111434,0.00094115513,0.00032622818,0.000009069142,0.00002201695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006264206,0.00005904789,0.00001479361,0.00018475039,0.00010091299,0.0014859115,0.000119267424,0.00008583051,0.00001485264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011284785,0.00014121675,0.004668863,0.00019896211,0.00022166029,0.00012966894,0.049305353,0.000008099576,0.00033084938,0.14896393,0.18246692,0.61345166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082979066,0.00009987551,0.15551424,0.00009896835,0.000018703051,0.000004838762,0.0062468825,0.0000047573685,0.00012969045,0.0003260219,0.8366092,0.000117019306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021623525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011360015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65414226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042909407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030841253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9075581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918396513","doi":"10.1108/ejim-07-2018-0141","title":"Paternalistic leadership and innovation: the moderating effect of environmental dynamism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Dynamism; Authoritarian leadership style; Psychology; Authoritarianism; Social psychology; Originality; Exploratory research; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Creativity; Social science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01950633989647428,"score_gpt":0.21541729071194954,"score_spread":0.19591095081547527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918396513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898386,0.000037820068,0.003203758,0.00077703083,0.00032325575,0.00021030911,0.0000012303717,0.00001165331,0.0055963174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979522,0.000004097475,0.00020581589,0.0010544559,0.00021013021,7.6407923e-7,0.000012742048,0.00002064745,0.00053912384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987306,0.000056629633,0.0006826134,0.00010116678,0.00033578722,0.00009317515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988796,0.00003175682,0.0007941583,0.00011172625,0.00017858767,0.000004186785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015389996,0.000112017005,0.00013287133,0.0005698028,0.000086782646,0.00012599726,0.0001503647,0.000011602009,0.0003169123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005986465,0.0000786243,0.000023010787,0.0010234216,0.000038628135,0.0004794417,0.00009213302,0.00012947718,0.00007384059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002230102,0.00009910691,0.5951942,0.0007260188,0.00022708667,0.000061666244,0.0002348635,0.0013576883,0.023050716,0.26621786,0.0019842293,0.11062352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021929652,0.00012147664,0.9840786,0.00017699513,0.0001227593,0.000023946845,0.0007726676,0.0009104843,0.00049701094,0.00033036916,0.010572144,0.00020058067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000011909133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.6833894e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38888437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025315243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038284857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34699675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979668467","doi":"10.1108/ejim-01-2019-0027","title":"An exploratory study on how SMEs are open to external sources of information","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Originality; Complementarity (molecular biology); Business; Industrial organization; Open innovation; Context (archaeology); Marketing; Small and medium-sized enterprises; Value (mathematics); Exploratory research; Expectancy theory; Knowledge management; Economics; Computer science; Creativity; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.034447760673391,"score_gpt":0.25863260730476717,"score_spread":0.22418484663137617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979668467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81771517,0.0000033865274,0.00649026,0.00097151875,0.0008071631,0.0010460117,0.0000011362209,0.000031808504,0.17293355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339134,9.959637e-7,0.0010246133,0.004515895,0.00039251926,0.000006938039,0.0000089960795,0.000026185202,0.0006325353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784917,0.00009553196,0.001068052,0.00017321692,0.00064647343,0.0001675808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960135,0.000009210813,0.0020505884,0.00038802685,0.001523122,0.000015522637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038566354,0.00019122132,0.00026532373,0.0022075123,0.000095824245,0.0008935637,0.001010859,0.000012784461,0.000109716064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062833,0.00016693547,0.000039443457,0.0021528068,0.000014733196,0.0032622952,0.0005037867,0.00014305963,0.00058578514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011978527,0.0024153143,0.11393617,0.00074314943,0.0004903555,0.00015033221,0.0037263592,0.0021969436,0.0011671459,0.71230054,0.03275936,0.12891646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072002513,0.0016460676,0.55637753,0.00090376823,0.00012995151,0.0000030242884,0.1109471,0.00036977977,0.00037390174,0.00091012876,0.32038137,0.00075712125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000014545992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018717441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71139044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048473514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001098957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8616655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012175298","doi":"10.1108/ejim-05-2019-0127","title":"A closer look at determinants of organizational capability to innovate (OCI)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Scopus; Construct (python library); Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Creativity; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.029674606520412705,"score_gpt":0.2366196983995139,"score_spread":0.2069450918791012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012175298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6561802,0.000019111132,0.010847821,0.0069682007,0.0008406033,0.000647956,0.000004939144,0.000078122335,0.32441306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808388,0.000003438388,0.0030667782,0.014395592,0.000866612,0.0000023474718,0.000021587819,0.00004881063,0.0007560735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700034,0.000053194068,0.0018361236,0.00026750434,0.000619127,0.00022371985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99537367,0.000012760456,0.0015757744,0.00023977437,0.0027729678,0.000025081936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020766354,0.0002187744,0.00031498345,0.0010408937,0.0001249172,0.000117573836,0.00053886947,0.0000205089,0.0005245362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004053899,0.00020519209,0.00006211433,0.005654877,0.000050556315,0.00048418084,0.0007068173,0.00014401982,0.0007508605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062924577,0.00044984886,0.089056045,0.0014754077,0.00032358567,0.00026488715,0.0006104263,0.00035444414,0.005595363,0.7645938,0.0954801,0.041166868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003777226,0.0002596231,0.12326474,0.00029611093,0.00016602605,0.000009297918,0.0013301569,0.0007912507,0.0024647035,0.0018479136,0.86506385,0.000729103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.4131195e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019720876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76958376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009057134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022325372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96510434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033513565","doi":"10.1108/ejim-12-2019-0355","title":"Contributory role of dynamic capabilities in the relationship between organizational learning and innovation performance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamic capabilities; Originality; Knowledge management; Organizational learning; Business; Organizational performance; Value (mathematics); Boosting (machine learning); Computer science; Marketing; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Creativity","score_opus":0.024926777600132816,"score_gpt":0.229977423096758,"score_spread":0.2050506454966252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033513565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9017673,0.000049107264,0.0024815244,0.003211282,0.0000975582,0.00027058728,9.98226e-7,0.000024236997,0.09209737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977232,0.0000069816842,0.00037255816,0.001393002,0.0003167267,0.0000018964821,0.00004997538,0.000018206856,0.00011745486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981081,0.0000960838,0.001170487,0.00013118394,0.00037370902,0.000120470555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767387,0.000078742996,0.0011061426,0.00008414268,0.0010522029,0.0000048977217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003192763,0.00012118405,0.00016506731,0.0012716611,0.00013259985,0.00011510064,0.00024024585,0.000017347882,0.000030260857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085444294,0.00010153649,0.000018297163,0.0055328505,0.000058179143,0.00052516634,0.00012607903,0.00026749156,0.000025678775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025962947,0.000024962885,0.3777401,0.00022144619,0.000024549405,0.0000038448975,0.0004282885,0.000056822857,0.00010486001,0.6146075,0.00017344244,0.0065882425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012702212,0.00007698643,0.9498516,0.00012584733,0.000047200796,0.0000017992177,0.006838619,0.0013204738,0.000020731613,0.0051115635,0.035167135,0.00016782877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.8883757e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.3666407e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60949594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036538684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014380753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41405377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114401931","doi":"10.1108/ejim-07-2020-0256","title":"Understanding social innovation leadership in universities: empirical insights from a group concept mapping study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Leadership studies; Concept map; Conceptual framework; Sociology; Knowledge management; Shared leadership; Leadership development; Leadership style; Psychology; Epistemology; Public relations; Social psychology; Social science; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.5310843807837494,"score_gpt":0.3449913499043138,"score_spread":0.18609303087943563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114401931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8409059,0.000026108894,0.06969562,0.017304972,0.0002808555,0.00032483076,9.780364e-7,0.000056096458,0.07140466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529785,0.00000540353,0.00054013374,0.0037059584,0.0003224877,6.009257e-7,0.000011109569,0.0000131851875,0.000103251805],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634045,0.0020685853,0.00070949906,0.00013843179,0.0005682868,0.00017475047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989772,0.00008920549,0.0005675092,0.00007930439,0.00025217957,0.000034642435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024757418,0.00010564533,0.00016571235,0.00069020275,0.00053371786,0.00013428385,0.00042003777,0.000022500479,0.00008553579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007919701,0.00011492505,0.00002825102,0.0040569673,0.00007051759,0.0003610427,0.00013228483,0.0005009735,0.000012110617],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013694495,0.0003235605,0.004719574,0.00003492648,0.0002495182,0.00032267103,0.68244517,0.00055513333,0.00009918605,0.3012374,0.0041326922,0.005743228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014598005,0.0001855662,0.026128603,0.00008052733,0.000019514595,1.3224016e-7,0.9312804,0.000055082168,0.0000021974001,0.00037964518,0.040286515,0.00012202295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051946176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003998729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30085778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055062026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006458423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46865076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132093707","doi":"10.1108/ejim-10-2020-0438","title":"Intergenerational hybrid products in periods of discontinuous change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Offensive; Marketing; Revenue; Product (mathematics); Value (mathematics); New product development; Ambidexterity; Business; Computer science; Process management; Knowledge management; Economics; Sociology; Qualitative research; Management","score_opus":0.04618889435466215,"score_gpt":0.23865702345079268,"score_spread":0.19246812909613054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132093707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38585612,0.0002520003,0.008946777,0.009637083,0.0033076021,0.0005705793,0.0000035148446,0.00004407282,0.59138227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913518,0.0000203817,0.0032237526,0.0023340879,0.0014212742,0.00000503485,0.000057356672,0.000026822816,0.0015595049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978821,0.000060156046,0.0013163182,0.00019172009,0.00038518858,0.00016451838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967818,0.0000059217487,0.0010265848,0.00020576753,0.001974171,0.0000057550856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020113292,0.00014668073,0.00022276652,0.0013267632,0.00005252445,0.00014338885,0.00025619825,0.000009390259,0.00019045039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018154405,0.00014024187,0.0000489003,0.0028259296,0.00003361603,0.0007315213,0.0002710257,0.00014181201,0.00006551811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008685237,0.0005395176,0.0057594553,0.00063291215,0.00014239355,0.0007542969,0.00018949054,0.00007272783,0.0027187823,0.8974698,0.019003604,0.07263016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004028422,0.000091144386,0.10854331,0.0007903287,0.00010572073,0.00003898883,0.0027121273,0.0007666046,0.0032027457,0.002314231,0.87681836,0.00058804994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000017395496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000046224695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8951556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004775492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022746723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57188976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136088698","doi":"10.1108/ejim-05-2020-0199","title":"Creative leadership, innovation climate and innovation behaviour: the moderating role of knowledge sharing in management","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Incentive; Knowledge management; Business; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Organisation climate; Marketing; Structural equation modeling; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08548914903500741,"score_gpt":0.3180346113153832,"score_spread":0.23254546228037576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136088698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55915064,0.0003288722,0.005532552,0.0011275433,0.00027123006,0.00040965137,0.0000013032753,0.000024903175,0.4331533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99374545,0.00024430797,0.002714647,0.0001605749,0.00013261668,0.00000593769,0.00001375698,0.00002123383,0.002961465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971537,0.00041907208,0.0014667824,0.00024126531,0.0004394659,0.00027970612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973955,0.000042966945,0.001008477,0.00019541604,0.00133919,0.000018423749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007715739,0.00014782173,0.00020732137,0.0017967235,0.00036053944,0.0002141224,0.0003510764,0.000026136482,0.00006257248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022511258,0.00013570639,0.000030587904,0.0077312025,0.00010748458,0.0005373266,0.00039387826,0.00025709593,0.0000073855417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030519903,0.00013217611,0.019018268,0.00018071556,0.00011916596,0.000055556025,0.011814565,0.00022373907,0.0004293789,0.8560921,0.00027118737,0.111632645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005368603,0.00026761065,0.51478434,0.0033374976,0.00039617045,0.00001390151,0.39891753,0.0030993838,0.0027890832,0.019736916,0.050309915,0.0009790695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006944469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030569965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83635515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013489633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033055992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55339456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203905568","doi":"10.1108/ejim-04-2021-0197","title":"Intangible resources and firms' innovation performance: empirical evidence from Chinese firms","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Business; Value (mathematics); Industrial organization; Empirical evidence; Marketing; Psychology","score_opus":0.04627056163446187,"score_gpt":0.25587956410812573,"score_spread":0.20960900247366387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203905568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852785,0.00027897576,0.0047774916,0.0030363398,0.00041924565,0.00008314764,0.0000017781867,0.00002527223,0.0060992413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99271214,0.000263903,0.0016693724,0.0033945297,0.0011769182,0.0000013756684,0.000019978012,0.000023412578,0.00073834835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982371,0.000036614696,0.0009126425,0.00022768193,0.0004289117,0.00015707861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743515,0.000031497377,0.0012207332,0.00021467562,0.0010899763,0.000007992759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013584442,0.00016590665,0.00019947528,0.00050886645,0.00014092801,0.00031634668,0.00024114992,0.00002010478,0.0001410719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031742768,0.0001397295,0.000031686428,0.0039155716,0.00003778279,0.0017945695,0.00024519087,0.00020666499,0.00008837075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022620894,0.00012594905,0.84410536,0.00030938568,0.000118050244,0.0005976159,0.00029732593,0.00052204664,0.0017701586,0.0034885926,0.04211106,0.10632827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006657239,0.000031380903,0.84612,0.0004729501,0.00003215049,0.000009722955,0.00013437016,0.00043023736,0.00007458525,0.0004938703,0.15138127,0.00015373742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008399968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035265339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1092702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035854737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020585085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5698003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213569613","doi":"10.1108/ejim-05-2021-0270","title":"How does the digital innovation process unfold in practice? A novel third-generation and empirical-based need–solution pairing model","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Knowledge management; Originality; Context (archaeology); Business; Innovation management; Process management; Empirical research; Information and Communications Technology; Digital transformation; Exploratory research; Computer science; Sociology; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.05466425114073973,"score_gpt":0.27187161226464523,"score_spread":0.2172073611239055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213569613","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13251464,0.0000734719,0.51630336,0.09385054,0.0011235763,0.00084230705,0.0000034210316,0.0001150344,0.25517365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833632,0.000009679669,0.0041400427,0.010524185,0.0007942942,0.0000093574445,0.00006955484,0.000034390763,0.0010552835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774367,0.00005816165,0.0011338852,0.00028110808,0.0005591823,0.0002240061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961561,0.000031743035,0.001368097,0.00023051475,0.002205015,0.000008528385],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026237958,0.00021819706,0.00018824944,0.001490749,0.00022595217,0.0016058286,0.00023929382,0.000030386294,0.0000058863166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007064995,0.00015879908,0.00003760137,0.005710695,0.000048995862,0.0032064416,0.0001937154,0.00028938238,0.00000909203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112611306,0.00052404025,0.0025792227,0.0003799634,0.00014086698,0.00011625026,0.00026341967,0.008154621,0.0027644655,0.9372167,0.0045571257,0.043190695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0083318185,0.00010894323,0.01074438,0.00074603676,0.00032849223,0.00003930768,0.015152739,0.61936814,0.0012108713,0.006511637,0.3362997,0.0011579817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.5500613e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029500288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9307051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007589322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053517746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229068661","doi":"10.1108/ejim-08-2021-0421","title":"The influence of organisational justice and ethical leadership on employees’ innovation behaviour","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Interactional justice; Economic Justice; Procedural justice; Credibility; Organizational justice; Public relations; Perception; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Organizational commitment","score_opus":0.04648245661329939,"score_gpt":0.26226483081344165,"score_spread":0.21578237420014226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229068661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98756063,0.000014193618,0.0011130793,0.008540095,0.00038870142,0.00015629413,0.0000024697135,0.00002120591,0.002203303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992113,0.000006661586,0.0003569395,0.0070192562,0.00021846993,0.0000025303666,0.000019103933,0.000023108705,0.00024096349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980615,0.00009858592,0.00087782944,0.00011999413,0.0007282665,0.000113875474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975789,0.00006767539,0.0010099756,0.00012218294,0.0012147097,0.000006547192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026896135,0.000105106854,0.0001019526,0.0007375383,0.00053273677,0.00012916134,0.00025594904,0.000016808186,0.00017524498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038247244,0.000088219844,0.00001959492,0.0024858194,0.00007137276,0.00027938923,0.00018685697,0.0004514915,0.000022640255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012644955,0.00009457476,0.029418375,0.00007926082,0.0000428063,0.000027555832,0.00013115142,0.004105242,0.0010367711,0.9489885,0.009328309,0.0066210097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000805964,0.00010264174,0.9585615,0.000034743676,0.00011473781,0.00001412954,0.002331604,0.000025808067,0.00005631735,0.0010709651,0.036755737,0.00012587986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000022191946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.685412e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059332437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027357733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40974346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289169110","doi":"10.1108/ejim-05-2022-0226","title":"Does generation matter to innovation development? A new look at entrepreneurial businesses from the perspective of resource-based view (RBV)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Business; Perspective (graphical); Marketing; Resource (disambiguation); Entrepreneurship; Structural equation modeling; Industrial organization; Finance","score_opus":0.028507826502494026,"score_gpt":0.22891360362271831,"score_spread":0.20040577712022428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289169110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.953373,0.00015899456,0.0058512096,0.02950569,0.001393967,0.0005476903,0.000006980267,0.000030896783,0.009131565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699318,0.000013207741,0.0023124826,0.023594942,0.0026860593,0.0000145643835,0.00010085811,0.0000440073,0.001302085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768883,0.00011755775,0.0011377261,0.00025692795,0.00063870504,0.00016023543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724084,0.000041205272,0.0014687692,0.00024260419,0.0009979336,0.000008640043],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014474677,0.00017581104,0.00020100013,0.0006557249,0.00043160573,0.00017551074,0.000460074,0.000009001419,0.0012766432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016661322,0.000111953945,0.000048204725,0.0027422488,0.000033672244,0.00037173938,0.00059681357,0.00013267575,0.00007573332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011228726,0.00043715863,0.13056354,0.00019642319,0.0007234057,0.00009271369,0.003113815,0.03301546,0.008661106,0.032220773,0.71072966,0.079123095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012739685,0.00005091831,0.10793678,0.00013387277,0.000095574884,0.0000013234039,0.0024311785,0.000050173145,0.0011055914,0.0004681894,0.8862158,0.00023661938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049941173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011938572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17548618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014850784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004230627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401911267","doi":"10.1108/ejim-04-2024-0426","title":"How the digital environment moderates disruptive technology and digital entrepreneurship relationship in emerging markets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Business; Disruptive innovation; Disruptive technology; Marketing; Emerging markets; Industrial organization; Engineering; Manufacturing engineering","score_opus":0.018372484480008274,"score_gpt":0.20763602986711002,"score_spread":0.18926354538710174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401911267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89288276,0.0007176189,0.035575327,0.018009823,0.0003809131,0.0003466084,0.000005987971,0.00010888836,0.051972046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767405,0.000026817786,0.0001932649,0.0001552796,0.00019559095,0.0000040964846,0.000011721278,0.000035373898,0.001703789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868023,0.000017398046,0.00057654874,0.00024670022,0.00027340787,0.0002057065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993099,0.00005970122,0.0003798463,0.00015569746,0.0000875147,0.0000073289416],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007969419,0.00018108744,0.00013550854,0.0015855358,0.00010413982,0.0026493089,0.00026414596,0.00002107699,0.000011953616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002598241,0.00013954786,0.000039954793,0.0018739059,0.00011117046,0.002892155,0.000345232,0.00030762225,0.00007163038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082480314,0.0001084538,0.09070678,0.00023030753,0.00011387238,0.00092594896,0.00018446034,0.0007235791,0.00013051368,0.53624254,0.0031456214,0.3674054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014172309,0.000108717664,0.3204459,0.0015096265,0.00009902206,0.00014057414,0.003712763,0.005373286,0.00010392249,0.057826564,0.6084608,0.00080161926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.9608939e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.8669878e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60531515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006851766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061201085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}