{"meta":{"query_hash":"71352ba3f4d0","filters":{"venue":"European Journal of International Relations"},"cohort_total":45,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":45,"exported":45,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/71352ba3f4d0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Journal+of+International+Relations"},"results":[{"id":"W2001085855","doi":"10.1177/1354066111411209","title":"Locating norm diplomacy: Venue change in international norm negotiations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Negotiation; Legitimacy; Mandate; Political science; Sociology; Normative; Humanitarian intervention; Public relations; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.0567165644630445,"score_gpt":0.3167099983085509,"score_spread":0.2599934338455064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001085855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2764113,0.00017674814,0.0022041523,0.005377243,0.0027799169,0.00014448458,0.000032772143,0.000030475434,0.71284294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99561673,0.00015743995,0.0021113988,0.00027217684,0.00091028464,0.0000015878459,0.000016913857,0.000014480986,0.00089899695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984072,0.00023835197,0.00054464495,0.00011303418,0.0005221949,0.00017461515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875385,0.0000907756,0.0004433264,0.00009059848,0.0005111183,0.00011035545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011234874,0.000090018766,0.000109312874,0.0003580449,0.00018753542,0.00007505535,0.00065493555,0.000036700807,0.00079671084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008997576,0.00009641551,0.00010953061,0.00027230673,0.000100134734,0.00087338954,0.00007201542,0.0003403251,0.0002566396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009410416,0.00070394675,0.4203618,0.0000054482603,0.00021720627,0.00041419294,0.25494125,0.00061999506,0.00007872954,0.29901704,0.0029495324,0.02059677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010983545,0.00009699505,0.81618655,0.00020735426,0.00003764783,0.000051598807,0.0077320784,0.0020002988,0.000007863623,0.006000201,0.16630813,0.00027294696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048138105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014248505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71920544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029385238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001212239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8723425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039078485","doi":"10.1177/1354066107083148","title":"Social-property Regimes and the Uneven and Combined Development of Nationalist Practices","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Sociology; Sovereignty; Historicity (philosophy); Field (mathematics); International relations; Context (archaeology); Capitalism; Epistemology; Historical sociology; Social science; Law; Politics; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044512755863538624,"score_gpt":0.337429214739678,"score_spread":0.2929164588761394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039078485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14119239,0.00020076992,0.0033215117,0.048377153,0.00025955963,0.00009271931,0.000002740025,0.0000065670024,0.80654657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904452,0.000047462458,0.0022331441,0.00019316102,0.00018716433,3.130014e-7,0.0000012771602,0.000003654474,0.0068886513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990022,0.00024247121,0.00038748034,0.000050362858,0.00024358841,0.00007390707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821836,0.00074232585,0.00064508396,0.000025042347,0.0003130406,0.000056135836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004050659,0.000040022358,0.00007994444,0.00007405364,0.00035986767,0.000046727604,0.00014967438,0.00001559273,0.000077260105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021883193,0.000024789639,0.00003230772,0.00005647653,0.0004217314,0.00027418972,0.000039593804,0.000121937286,0.000006137944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009217693,0.000033069686,0.0016435427,0.000001972645,0.000093818126,0.0000043107348,0.010908499,0.0000025767908,0.000014601886,0.97864664,0.001263624,0.0072951824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014638224,0.000027733622,0.13631096,0.00004137586,0.000033358472,0.000020245656,0.0040478627,0.000043474876,0.00003245005,0.013732179,0.8441681,0.00007843407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033723987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060778846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96491444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004324798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014079157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27678475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042214552","doi":"10.1177/1354066100006002004","title":"Popular Sovereignty or Cosmopolitan Democracy?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Liberalism; Democracy; Ideology; Argument (complex analysis); Cosmopolitanism; Liberal democracy; Anachronism; Classical liberalism; Popular sovereignty; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.01917570471176525,"score_gpt":0.3004509479153544,"score_spread":0.28127524320358915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042214552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15604274,0.00008687986,0.0005661515,0.0055943485,0.00051423855,0.000047260983,0.00001878735,0.000019633288,0.83711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315883,0.00033593326,0.0015265199,0.00039307927,0.0005805762,1.4166282e-7,0.000008194043,0.000010765507,0.06555647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846584,0.00035532814,0.00041085234,0.00007965234,0.0005352213,0.00015311455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917895,0.00008025524,0.0002043617,0.00007951639,0.00030911507,0.00014780188],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009225439,0.000070842245,0.00009461907,0.00009982524,0.00033681863,0.00009846066,0.00044434713,0.000026498861,0.012180233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005475872,0.000060537383,0.00012501332,0.00015684163,0.0001025242,0.00045801888,0.000018283135,0.00023292459,0.0008234467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002508391,0.00033412725,0.013506796,0.0000025931324,0.0002510216,0.0006747609,0.009354054,0.0023532973,0.000020279016,0.801905,0.14283699,0.028510297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054462504,0.000093114824,0.013125826,0.000055317087,0.00003029762,0.00008457574,0.0017522123,0.00032292813,0.0000010978125,0.035987463,0.9478716,0.00013093665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041574818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093910916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80503464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018590229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014460295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055702753","doi":"10.1177/1354066100006003001","title":"Refusing an Ethical Approach to World Politics in Favour of Political Ethics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"International relations; Politics; Autonomy; Sociology; Epistemology; International relations theory; Political philosophy; Information ethics; Environmental ethics; Global politics; Critical theory; Meta-ethics; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1210432289742689,"score_gpt":0.4007196451823926,"score_spread":0.2796764162081237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055702753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08268169,0.000013967305,0.0027944304,0.05459744,0.0002498685,0.000057288547,0.000015567268,0.000011473879,0.85957825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856318,0.000008962906,0.007513052,0.0030816705,0.0007985108,3.5016708e-7,0.0000038571707,0.000014085755,0.0029477153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963479,0.0015814527,0.0007312905,0.00012361369,0.00090565445,0.0003100723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978582,0.00088962284,0.00013724087,0.00011323292,0.0005593401,0.00044231303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043282644,0.00008536876,0.00016067307,0.00038390153,0.00020418134,0.000056397643,0.0004985093,0.0001331868,0.00038291296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004549633,0.0000843662,0.00010393163,0.00036620896,0.00038186097,0.0002692383,0.00003325961,0.0021545438,0.00008018836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001922233,0.00025516914,0.0006854518,0.0000029561804,0.000015280355,0.000016414815,0.007557245,0.001181739,0.000011319813,0.9896821,0.00017391221,0.0003991951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019949835,0.0003897342,0.0980272,0.0006543795,0.00007497188,0.00006806299,0.005705545,0.0015585975,0.000052282954,0.6630765,0.22785275,0.00054495636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020785102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000100347075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9029501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023816901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043111845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93605405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068458554","doi":"10.1177/1354066106067349","title":"Integration Under Anarchy: Neorealism and the European Union","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Neorealism (international relations); European union; International relations; Political science; European integration; Power (physics); Hierarchy; Regionalism (politics); Balance (ability); Political economy; Law and economics; International trade; Epistemology; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.01739331752242806,"score_gpt":0.2795460813008303,"score_spread":0.26215276377840224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068458554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0142531935,0.00020369767,0.037780408,0.023572672,0.00047436127,0.00006350893,0.000008434849,0.000018721956,0.923625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97846365,0.0002606316,0.0006315415,0.00047090938,0.0014041361,2.3526641e-7,0.000007892851,0.000016621745,0.01874436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953708,0.003545611,0.00045094514,0.0000915042,0.00042627784,0.000114831615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872315,0.00031093444,0.0004895357,0.000094141644,0.00031883398,0.0000634231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055626202,0.0000807771,0.00008648212,0.0001239366,0.0004163114,0.00016304772,0.0003766527,0.000013394751,0.00010846387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000636801,0.000056513647,0.00009040861,0.00016105302,0.0004561946,0.00037391266,0.00005129261,0.0002780972,0.00008672704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021255484,0.000024028812,0.00049700437,4.050323e-7,0.00002371706,0.000024193578,0.0020503511,0.0006382974,0.00007655433,0.97274035,0.015369191,0.008534649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014256185,0.000031943553,0.37146163,0.00007624088,0.000027969052,0.000055463628,0.0009769464,0.00012163798,0.00001225783,0.020257302,0.60544544,0.000107533524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046332326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002866145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96421045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006986473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049860955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32019728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072474219","doi":"10.1177/1354066106061332","title":"The Alive and Well Transatlantic Security Community: A Theoretical Reply to Michael Cox","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009373258577177971,"score_gpt":0.27901826132992935,"score_spread":0.2696450027527514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072474219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16948679,0.00011482086,0.0064082276,0.02336831,0.00028921498,0.00011675225,0.000014857945,0.00001970561,0.8001813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935881,0.00008953674,0.0006296316,0.00065053377,0.00061352056,0.0000012505088,0.0000056882395,0.000012047992,0.00440971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979552,0.0008511419,0.00047604635,0.00007460472,0.0004924521,0.00015052309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980495,0.0009363112,0.00022704792,0.000107057815,0.00057016476,0.00010992029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002660185,0.00008085681,0.00008810872,0.00016084689,0.0010267973,0.00019254054,0.00045560524,0.000024000965,0.00023304245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094495807,0.00006128922,0.00010014801,0.00015112746,0.00045833786,0.00019304005,0.000048395104,0.0004320427,0.00014987202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000342845,0.000050013932,0.0015110578,5.4783084e-7,0.000044002263,0.000012715104,0.004986242,0.00013187322,0.000019894545,0.9778855,0.014972367,0.00035154467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058287976,0.00017586378,0.04071698,0.00008320067,0.000047138223,0.000106522755,0.0034471033,0.0006065005,0.000017041808,0.24684681,0.7072184,0.00015154445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029717505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016725252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82410127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102583406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008856872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78973985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095453624","doi":"10.1177/1354066110391309","title":"Uneven and combined development and the Anglo-German prelude to World War I","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Expansionism; German; Geopolitics; Materialism; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Historical materialism; Political economy; Marxist philosophy; Political science; Law; History; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.03175697296265319,"score_gpt":0.27659196186441987,"score_spread":0.2448349889017667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095453624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20832963,0.000089315974,0.001396312,0.011753687,0.0003283055,0.000089454756,0.0000019072833,0.000008331183,0.77800304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98649335,0.000025748484,0.002970183,0.00059623015,0.00012511751,9.3751703e-7,4.97566e-7,0.000004292582,0.009783641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929,0.00018961275,0.00024820687,0.000053701337,0.0001334909,0.000084980114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945456,0.00016660594,0.00010854529,0.000036128622,0.00010262172,0.00013152321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011427259,0.000041596933,0.00006423276,0.00009267882,0.00021660919,0.00003278691,0.00017033247,0.000008144082,0.0002499748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003822695,0.000030004343,0.000025226469,0.000060343402,0.00016577756,0.00016797711,0.000055377885,0.00011025548,0.00006227437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007442103,0.000031781958,0.0029794083,7.613634e-7,0.00007135453,0.000014767874,0.033340733,0.0000037943978,0.000002783075,0.95317423,0.0028262353,0.007479751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009130977,0.00003882735,0.19836977,0.000044350985,0.000018628005,0.00001309883,0.0008779865,0.000021591295,0.000022735727,0.012891221,0.7867099,0.000078823854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025225325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096688156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037923648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057226465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2737049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100177189","doi":"10.1177/1354066110377674","title":"Exceptionalism in American foreign policy: Is it exceptional?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Normative; Foreign policy; American exceptionalism; International relations; Politics; Political science; Foreign relations; Westphalian sovereignty; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Sovereignty","score_opus":0.022812827234562294,"score_gpt":0.351352931387141,"score_spread":0.3285401041525787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100177189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09464595,0.000014679592,0.0031072325,0.022450527,0.0004942832,0.0000884015,0.000038993807,0.000020336513,0.8791396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727364,0.00009726727,0.00447275,0.0015303147,0.0027213083,0.0000029851024,0.000017919321,0.000023502273,0.018397514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756193,0.0002751982,0.00079096813,0.00016072753,0.00096921675,0.00024193709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778885,0.00030556478,0.00064566877,0.00013650849,0.0009385424,0.00018489792],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018642406,0.000130312,0.00015846449,0.0011014682,0.00027627966,0.00012631333,0.0006726771,0.000050624556,0.0055517573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018928541,0.00012990134,0.0002194271,0.0005910586,0.00043983472,0.0006559817,0.00005535476,0.0006884088,0.0008453977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019055347,0.000099049284,0.018429197,5.2297713e-7,0.00005026394,0.000026464995,0.0040765977,0.0002774147,0.0002009238,0.9489858,0.025222793,0.0026119126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007168112,0.00006389527,0.25528067,0.00004829245,0.000013880237,0.00007569744,0.0020787786,0.00033047327,0.000011437286,0.07302323,0.6681732,0.00018366415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029355532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028180305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8780905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030266872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057434425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121742265","doi":"10.1177/1354066105052968","title":"Legitimating the Use of Force in International Politics: A Communicative Action Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Communicative action; Politics; Norm (philosophy); Law and economics; Charter; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; International law; Conflation; Political science; Action (physics); Social science","score_opus":0.08160332007493927,"score_gpt":0.36705043591220393,"score_spread":0.2854471158372647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121742265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35815886,0.00020804557,0.011019039,0.07513182,0.0009849584,0.00023091592,0.000053249936,0.000019748493,0.5541934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912776,0.00018208833,0.0049989433,0.00023466666,0.00036320457,6.352029e-7,0.0000049616556,0.0000069323864,0.0029309958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838924,0.0005287812,0.0004690411,0.00006314419,0.00044560438,0.00010417355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997915,0.0004960231,0.0005242851,0.00009651071,0.00092500687,0.000043158256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010300203,0.000059378424,0.00008670515,0.00019077532,0.00018228304,0.000085479645,0.0005612726,0.000021617117,0.000178056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020606183,0.000050150127,0.000103406994,0.00015431156,0.0002004239,0.0008784997,0.00006835811,0.00034528345,0.000026028216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053334225,0.0002598949,0.009317044,0.000001397622,0.00020113043,0.000013361036,0.10247736,0.03752305,0.00009488278,0.84208065,0.0032691937,0.004708702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020452407,0.0001661954,0.10774767,0.00049353024,0.00007697335,0.00009220381,0.1584286,0.06198496,0.000035004166,0.022679282,0.6459092,0.00034115693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037769446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011128562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8194014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005244735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011782509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24669012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125564313","doi":"10.1177/1354066109344007","title":"Woodrow Wilson revisited: Human rights discourse in the foreign policy of the George W. Bush Administration","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Foreign policy; George (robot); Interpretation (philosophy); Administration (probate law); Law; Sociology; Political science; Corporate governance; Public administration; Law and economics; Politics; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.01771992136877903,"score_gpt":0.26088687784520753,"score_spread":0.2431669564764285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125564313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29403833,0.000016743192,0.00017348105,0.007556812,0.00043946414,0.00007869483,0.00004031028,0.000004502745,0.6976517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862939,0.0000013090456,0.000055400116,0.00017729566,0.0011157966,7.3508625e-7,0.00001149363,0.0000075804437,0.012336454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987945,0.00019266685,0.0005318286,0.00006460302,0.00032846318,0.00008793266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912953,0.00011372921,0.00035884802,0.00014300243,0.00021331532,0.000041562304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005174287,0.00007643329,0.0000939939,0.0001311698,0.00025560666,0.000073687304,0.00049478124,0.00001636214,0.0004870494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018600648,0.00004103505,0.0001406232,0.00006772387,0.00021575566,0.0002679191,0.000025972491,0.00044951,0.00002736964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009116041,0.00010429793,0.0009488033,0.0000019433369,0.000017366008,0.000011439134,0.0019386784,0.000010236653,0.000080174796,0.99491364,0.0018423392,0.00012195475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063870073,0.00024258929,0.050667685,0.00017121976,0.000048307316,0.00007853197,0.0008266405,0.0002876443,0.000021754224,0.12735675,0.81950814,0.00015203876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005782033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003076073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86755687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003792288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055188048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53328496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126037355","doi":"10.1177/1354066108097554","title":"`World Opinion' and the Founding of the UN: Governmentalizing International Politics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Public opinion; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Political economy; Law; History","score_opus":0.020274496106721097,"score_gpt":0.2782130252750974,"score_spread":0.2579385291683763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126037355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29639995,0.0003468388,0.0017497999,0.034042668,0.0049431617,0.00011169694,0.000027217879,0.000008452482,0.6623702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937336,0.0004642659,0.00055342127,0.00027670022,0.00063679134,2.1395012e-7,0.0000016938412,0.000005832352,0.0043275156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984803,0.00034599614,0.00036528174,0.000055085224,0.00066812756,0.00008520707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989366,0.000265827,0.00043139097,0.000069876194,0.0002499447,0.00004638025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010143579,0.00005333332,0.00007785688,0.00006950805,0.00048951263,0.000047086916,0.00052531314,0.000012449052,0.00013394801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008111704,0.000034779587,0.00011982833,0.00013345337,0.00050307467,0.00023655414,0.00010733444,0.00019836574,0.000008360585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024217603,0.000038695307,0.037551917,9.4470425e-7,0.00012956557,0.000008416718,0.010701105,0.00029165143,0.000016975102,0.94624186,0.0047061606,0.00028851492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019631316,0.000027026283,0.1482019,0.0001622989,0.00004373964,0.00020225224,0.007079831,0.001276189,0.000013482772,0.0104741175,0.83043456,0.000121456906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006715688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006857366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001551598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007942396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3764985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130927848","doi":"10.1177/1354066109343987","title":"Hamas and the Israeli state: A ‘violent dialogue’","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Perspective (graphical); Political violence; Sociology; State (computer science); Subject (documents); Subject matter; Epistemology; Criminology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010440871482900318,"score_gpt":0.2807509252516393,"score_spread":0.270310053768739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130927848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86780864,0.0002114748,0.005113752,0.028687345,0.003930153,0.0001140365,0.000019499364,0.000021220416,0.094093904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951527,0.00022539818,0.00014283933,0.00051339087,0.0010150314,9.4518145e-7,0.0000015646467,0.000009162043,0.0029389493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850047,0.0004457748,0.00038983359,0.00008560801,0.0004305829,0.00014775092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987142,0.00045979006,0.00025003118,0.00009551291,0.0003354409,0.00014500205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020982602,0.000073635674,0.00009920652,0.00008822724,0.00030496495,0.0001396132,0.0004171993,0.00002277598,0.00040891944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012954059,0.00004919845,0.00009704926,0.000074405194,0.00056915527,0.00028080473,0.000049176073,0.0004898333,0.00014544064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058312976,0.00039148366,0.050341636,0.000008197397,0.0005239873,0.0002522941,0.3407711,0.00015685291,0.000828987,0.47666326,0.040073816,0.08940524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035830913,0.00015323845,0.20378284,0.00017430734,0.00009745064,0.00017344004,0.036577854,0.0004815404,0.00003242891,0.017580196,0.73703665,0.00032696564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001037379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017494903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69696283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003371383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101076104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4477381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140813919","doi":"10.1177/1354066108089241","title":"The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO's Post—Cold War Transformation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":490,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; North Atlantic Treaty; Ontological security; Security studies; Political science; Treaty; Cold war; Political economy; Epistemic community; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.015919639392878743,"score_gpt":0.27975628211666903,"score_spread":0.26383664272379026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140813919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8209642,0.00037671492,0.0003687095,0.005032808,0.00023155771,0.000103479695,0.00005160127,0.000010959527,0.17285994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941546,0.00487716,0.0006866691,0.000091770366,0.00005886712,4.0325065e-7,0.000009703947,0.0000063509556,0.00011449592],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978074,0.0009597795,0.00058914896,0.000028122775,0.00051912473,0.00009646378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681205,0.0010599934,0.00065653946,0.00010608813,0.0013085109,0.000056841123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019392502,0.00006889312,0.00011818984,0.00011794709,0.00062210415,0.000032398795,0.0004571927,0.000029952214,0.000037280854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053304504,0.00005713657,0.0000931747,0.00011672715,0.0005264073,0.00074402377,0.000040840547,0.00035694367,0.0000043683044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010768583,0.0003210112,0.006114308,0.000015062899,0.00035310566,0.000017990555,0.6744888,0.0005520673,0.0000581495,0.31586343,0.0014500144,0.00065837963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013444752,0.00047981084,0.03407117,0.00029659155,0.00014022418,0.00028248955,0.5244964,0.0018914754,0.00003622489,0.0030979344,0.4336503,0.0002129419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007912591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013837594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43220028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006025675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001603322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47847852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143283999","doi":"10.1177/1354066100006004002","title":"Ideas, Social Structure and the Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental governance; Normative; Environmentalism; Scholarship; Sociology; Norm (philosophy); Environmental ethics; Corporate governance; Positive economics; Political science; Epistemology; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.007647721956023704,"score_gpt":0.24043631270561616,"score_spread":0.23278859074959246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143283999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71409446,0.000116209754,0.00011006246,0.014251114,0.0003626549,0.00006925401,0.000020447096,0.000004713101,0.27097112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98572797,0.00012004442,0.00068919675,0.00017246272,0.00046172566,2.4109974e-7,0.000006052485,0.0000059756785,0.0128163295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988198,0.0002912525,0.00033519935,0.000052313637,0.00043659678,0.00006483161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994808,0.00011116503,0.00024749074,0.000028521059,0.00009775365,0.000034276567],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066106993,0.000052503572,0.00008421651,0.00006052167,0.000252935,0.000043264816,0.00026729153,0.000016313257,0.004401678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009195385,0.000037790105,0.0000756417,0.000050934606,0.00035985355,0.00021373744,0.000023715565,0.00015069952,0.000033191056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006804265,0.0001387807,0.016769098,0.0000038926682,0.0005842641,0.000047558482,0.058343183,0.0007958257,0.0005944762,0.85545,0.031576037,0.035016455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004634975,0.00005434709,0.5362463,0.00008216885,0.00007227751,0.00006760793,0.001338205,0.00029043222,0.00008710541,0.03548346,0.42143843,0.00020467878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015304387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000062837667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81996655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004524673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035995963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144285371","doi":"10.1177/1354066110366054","title":"Consensus-seeking, distrust and rhetorical entrapment: The WTO decision on access to medicines","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Deliberation; Rhetorical question; Norm (philosophy); Law and economics; Rhetoric; Intellectual property; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02357723465089058,"score_gpt":0.3309993650507316,"score_spread":0.307422130399841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144285371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5300609,0.00003595709,0.0055294996,0.3015069,0.004768942,0.00018630754,0.000010031606,0.000027777804,0.15787368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996008,0.000027364602,0.00080174743,0.0009920816,0.00095026183,4.126578e-7,0.0000014901242,0.000011386916,0.0012072563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864894,0.00019568561,0.0003443503,0.00009584404,0.00061851606,0.0000966751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846387,0.00072678295,0.00021863618,0.00008937785,0.0003355507,0.00016578735],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010209052,0.00006860492,0.00007440409,0.00014566256,0.00040323075,0.00022160113,0.00051053084,0.000018928873,0.0011287392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032083937,0.000045901383,0.00004001849,0.00022877453,0.00017904266,0.00016556775,0.00006237406,0.0003211046,0.00009462738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015349104,0.00018589685,0.11620051,0.0000015328302,0.00013121536,0.00010632068,0.008798287,0.0005788025,0.0013712376,0.6411305,0.2149485,0.016393697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026837553,0.000037432677,0.32821926,0.000042439202,0.000014369264,0.000032488224,0.0002377086,0.00003533479,0.000032920456,0.0006451776,0.6703781,0.00005641898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000057598204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011659505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64048535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054132666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060888047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148714976","doi":"10.1177/1354066105055483","title":"See You in Geneva? Legal (Mis)Representations of the Trading System","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Legalization; International law; Law; Law and economics; Shadow (psychology); Political science; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.016354965241186566,"score_gpt":0.27757695683022293,"score_spread":0.26122199158903636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148714976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2273257,0.00012264629,0.0032961527,0.04417203,0.0014785354,0.00015964337,0.000015269388,0.000025266518,0.72340477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99078304,0.000010197718,0.0017198235,0.000059008322,0.00058355764,4.5173215e-7,0.0000016597569,0.000013408077,0.006828846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810183,0.0005185257,0.00063160405,0.000078231555,0.0005704486,0.00009935025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884164,0.00014936096,0.0004921457,0.00010163734,0.0003555317,0.00005968289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010574304,0.00005957964,0.00009180036,0.00022058393,0.00020379316,0.00006173545,0.0005302367,0.000018178116,0.00073605555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006401386,0.000050444214,0.00010291437,0.000502145,0.000118153046,0.0005305543,0.000026586618,0.00021636224,0.0000808132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016564563,0.00016212378,0.07323095,0.000005028309,0.000115463044,0.000029619981,0.017498836,0.029630564,0.0011434117,0.8688554,0.008002527,0.0013095061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012116061,0.000025681637,0.49601114,0.0002885015,0.000058017456,0.00009768318,0.008246908,0.002281807,0.00047266242,0.00016731277,0.490972,0.00016666866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043306954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020350829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8686881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029090088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019022878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80592924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155069750","doi":"10.1177/1354066107074283","title":"Peacekeeping: Organized Hypocrisy?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":289,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Peacekeeping; Political science; Cold war; Phenomenon; Political economy; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02143607531424409,"score_gpt":0.3228418640737957,"score_spread":0.30140578875955165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155069750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17305456,0.00038897054,0.03517436,0.0061031673,0.0023837474,0.00005112812,0.000004345588,0.000042364318,0.78279734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828533,0.00022499729,0.0042443154,0.00023132602,0.001590308,1.2811385e-7,0.0000041876847,0.000014853868,0.010836583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981271,0.00027735066,0.00056454784,0.00009540818,0.0007582857,0.00017728013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980758,0.00031153686,0.00045015063,0.00007496638,0.0009168367,0.0001707115],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044649015,0.000075785894,0.00009887035,0.00029577033,0.00029735928,0.00009346382,0.0005591873,0.000027584289,0.0016851021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028492876,0.000074547,0.00013759852,0.00022273586,0.00011587751,0.00043568565,0.000043541502,0.000320628,0.00041550735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002932859,0.0005725211,0.03882194,0.0000035458945,0.0005754963,0.0006858916,0.027034927,0.0004696476,0.0068160314,0.57049274,0.32047334,0.033760626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004620101,0.000035372053,0.05627856,0.00004105791,0.000015135738,0.000050139693,0.0012210911,0.000024898201,0.0001309073,0.00079689856,0.9408508,0.00009316461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043224805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050706978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8097987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025029323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012656512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160207135","doi":"10.1177/1354066109346887","title":"From states to polities: Reconceptualizing sovereignty through Inuit governance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Westphalian sovereignty; Politics; Demise; State (computer science); Sociology; Dichotomy; Political economy; International relations; Political science; Identity (music); Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.028768052899381863,"score_gpt":0.3246449672258363,"score_spread":0.29587691432645447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160207135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14756055,0.00010446417,0.0024960788,0.037784006,0.0025245256,0.00006838239,0.00014593078,0.000024013822,0.8092921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97351265,0.00015600702,0.008727463,0.0009405989,0.0026997342,6.098844e-7,0.0000026783164,0.000012936714,0.013947341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987319,0.00018159201,0.00039514084,0.00010105329,0.00043060916,0.00015970522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987991,0.00035067523,0.00035556775,0.000086441396,0.00028600538,0.00012220815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005628972,0.000079358855,0.00011041913,0.00005019711,0.0003561722,0.000080788006,0.0004250573,0.000023135954,0.003698849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015588977,0.0000695015,0.00009360379,0.00010589769,0.00019862555,0.00045903676,0.00007100479,0.00032864726,0.00039562178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020524261,0.000038234713,0.0033579513,6.927618e-7,0.00015385052,0.00002574862,0.23874876,0.00014567812,0.00009915363,0.660773,0.093430184,0.003206228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024877102,0.000032365762,0.03453581,0.00006659504,0.000015868718,0.0000065197005,0.023625456,0.000011146872,0.000023637589,0.051939577,0.88937575,0.00011852019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011927806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000917438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8259521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014084399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017005262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99721193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160513394","doi":"10.1177/1354066113512702","title":"Power in practice: Negotiating the international intervention in Libya","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":490,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Negotiation; International relations; Political science; Intervention (counseling); Power (physics); International relations theory; Sociology; Epistemology; Political economy; Politics; Law; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010387925655427227,"score_gpt":0.3109744479693619,"score_spread":0.3005865223139347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160513394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18161742,0.00014648282,0.006491513,0.036803048,0.0029481265,0.000102159815,0.000003803694,0.000012062069,0.7718754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682724,0.00010584888,0.00089991896,0.00041800147,0.00035890404,7.7362427e-7,0.00000472646,0.000008352841,0.0013762492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766773,0.000923186,0.0006014189,0.00009108885,0.0005862496,0.00013033196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984756,0.0005170683,0.000483341,0.000075601194,0.00040065363,0.000047714573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004914783,0.00006563891,0.00008187609,0.000262785,0.000111592155,0.00020175257,0.0006381553,0.000028132461,0.0002580614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006334848,0.000055556953,0.00009266,0.00022503598,0.00007363235,0.00082881865,0.000070308466,0.0004560599,0.000093845854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015055152,0.0006642264,0.10843657,0.0000021628493,0.00015550712,0.00014866612,0.03911026,0.039436914,0.00006217728,0.7865077,0.011718673,0.013606581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011335736,0.00007879351,0.1368785,0.00017724605,0.000013526482,0.00003691355,0.01584508,0.009640067,9.729005e-7,0.002674143,0.83340055,0.0001206557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020046721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063722907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82168186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026286958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006632265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7583862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162669982","doi":"10.1177/1354066113495477","title":"In the beginning: The International Relations enlightenment and the ends of International Relations theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International relations theory; International relations; Enlightenment; Opposition (politics); Realism; Liberalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Post-realism; Normative; Assertion; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013638075275197385,"score_gpt":0.28167121526161043,"score_spread":0.26803313998641304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162669982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027166683,0.00037572192,0.004856207,0.13186231,0.0015586565,0.00046167045,0.000037530703,0.000018722933,0.8336625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559106,0.0002685768,0.0011706782,0.0013065645,0.0011086463,0.00003218871,0.000024751465,0.000023722485,0.040154256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952497,0.0014048994,0.0013040446,0.0002078824,0.0015905707,0.00024292764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994205,0.0030601546,0.0011289078,0.0002881632,0.0012284442,0.000089317684],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064909547,0.00019570104,0.00020595024,0.00056357036,0.00076992536,0.00037925862,0.002012199,0.0000762033,0.005862549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036583035,0.00011368856,0.0002972693,0.00046832004,0.0010645089,0.0012254005,0.00019846013,0.0008476601,0.00050650066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060155733,0.00011233122,0.006653249,7.3008545e-7,0.00027520923,0.000010734226,0.016635949,0.0011496514,0.000030511665,0.925536,0.04826633,0.0012691935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002868731,0.000081118706,0.14662674,0.00014714675,0.00014639634,0.00021558953,0.017675472,0.004715019,0.000014306876,0.19483152,0.63240993,0.00026802815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025941207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007131948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92874396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030711727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024775745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229727330","doi":"10.1177/1354066115598635","title":"The perils of realist advocacy and the promise of securitization theory: Revisiting the tragedy of the Iraq War debate","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Framing (construction); Opposition (politics); Political economy; Sociology; Realism; Politics; Scholarship; International relations; International relations theory; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.023351394941067468,"score_gpt":0.2962113489188762,"score_spread":0.2728599539778087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229727330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45543563,0.003437084,0.00206413,0.14137419,0.001048915,0.0006588969,0.000053775882,0.000010393862,0.395917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836046,0.0006233197,0.000083117666,0.00012773614,0.0003033067,7.70142e-7,0.0000014936902,0.000005525437,0.0004942794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551284,0.0030678667,0.00062636053,0.00005662069,0.00063825055,0.00009804453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666137,0.0011554195,0.0010395187,0.00013338825,0.0009481856,0.000062148385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012561172,0.000056766316,0.00011689317,0.000036185957,0.0005057686,0.000049941907,0.0006246492,0.000020997695,0.0000347779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077066934,0.000025338522,0.00010807545,0.0002379102,0.0007803309,0.00018778178,0.00006497813,0.00026091587,0.0000014812189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001345505,0.000025821377,0.0017168883,0.000007896633,0.00007618453,0.0000012997301,0.065648384,0.0002994035,0.0000182655,0.92381054,0.0019458964,0.0063148956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043772017,0.00025108355,0.10606237,0.0010768431,0.00024764612,0.00011504146,0.10917713,0.0016742628,0.000117338,0.14738497,0.6292922,0.00022392649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023230283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000086101514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77642554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004594839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042033498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92261887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287561076","doi":"10.1177/1354066116632853","title":"Is IR going extinct?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Existentialism; Context (archaeology); Environmental ethics; International relations; Tragedy (event); Narrative; Politics; Social science; History; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02101251850954533,"score_gpt":0.26936787498572806,"score_spread":0.24835535647618273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287561076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3006514,0.000024345642,0.08778114,0.012120801,0.0016564596,0.000037140755,0.000024269471,0.0000101752275,0.5976943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845377,0.0000035182798,0.0009947863,0.00009031051,0.0011380361,2.1135249e-7,0.000001111587,0.000007618924,0.013226677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926114,0.000060963514,0.000297262,0.00007103142,0.00022353946,0.00008603336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993527,0.00008152282,0.00026338053,0.000070574104,0.0001616654,0.00007019049],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039940747,0.000056407942,0.00006161459,0.00009525464,0.000063885396,0.000051276427,0.0002494503,0.0000056611107,0.005115637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064246975,0.000035448444,0.000108118424,0.00006964715,0.000033679855,0.00041303126,0.000029140772,0.0000838657,0.0014568882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097364085,0.00018667802,0.56077504,0.0000010100372,0.00037033926,0.00005517352,0.0012523804,0.00031351126,0.023866335,0.07698971,0.20670006,0.12939237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023993254,0.00017510512,0.19335686,0.0002959481,0.000043300446,0.00004056363,0.00045375945,0.00024308382,0.0034416015,0.009355645,0.78991574,0.00027907343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000019771855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.95399e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68388635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022515658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005088569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322212198","doi":"10.1177/1354066115603781","title":"Status insecurity and temporality in world politics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia; Northwestern University","keywords":"Temporality; Sociology; Privilege (computing); Context (archaeology); Social status; Politics; Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.06269741367577039,"score_gpt":0.35809255265426315,"score_spread":0.2953951389784928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322212198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18714951,0.00016401264,0.0007178386,0.0032096514,0.000349165,0.000051209634,0.000015899692,0.0000119391,0.8083308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98961085,0.0000653438,0.0017618575,0.00016153787,0.00046944022,4.656342e-7,0.0000060510492,0.000008360726,0.007916119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983912,0.0003854886,0.0004852494,0.000078881254,0.0005048334,0.0001543659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986303,0.00016254287,0.00028435155,0.000057959707,0.00063279894,0.00023208887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001945071,0.00006430915,0.00009202356,0.0005070197,0.00011349476,0.0000847107,0.0002023665,0.000021436928,0.00016919861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019031347,0.000062781095,0.000050710772,0.00025260495,0.00015849182,0.000490467,0.000044453398,0.00026866593,0.00006693395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013829548,0.00005610543,0.13415186,5.535679e-7,0.000021392189,0.000031677337,0.005385988,0.00024548496,0.0000019622973,0.8539465,0.0056620003,0.00048261802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009492689,0.000052178457,0.31655294,0.000055495875,0.000010629967,0.000021316459,0.0019464813,0.00040577175,0.0000022507452,0.07866384,0.601229,0.00011081307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035414053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036944106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8024613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036003088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036115205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25601387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342896750","doi":"10.1177/1354066115588205","title":"“Take it outside!” National identity contestation in the foreign policy arena","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Turkey's Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bilkent Üniversitesi; University of British Columbia; George Washington University; Institute of Turkish Studies","keywords":"European union; Political economy; Political science; Identity (music); Hegemony; Foreign policy; Politics; Sociology; Law; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.09524866740796349,"score_gpt":0.3864902657770817,"score_spread":0.29124159836911817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342896750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029797664,0.00005699174,0.0063939802,0.03084672,0.0005303479,0.00009637988,0.000024369676,0.000009673226,0.9322439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933698,0.00003610831,0.00067467126,0.001385244,0.0012364353,0.0000011980796,0.000011446627,0.000008077918,0.003276993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974102,0.00065794843,0.00048385776,0.00007593567,0.0012292841,0.00014280401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786866,0.00035117872,0.00035782263,0.000062518004,0.001248298,0.00011151098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049310788,0.00006670383,0.00008096465,0.00021536861,0.00020459904,0.00020403738,0.0005330302,0.000026369768,0.000109917135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005235341,0.000053599404,0.0001145454,0.0002968615,0.00013386524,0.0008077477,0.000028603248,0.00027862625,0.00012018311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007877117,0.000061351806,0.0076983604,5.28343e-7,0.000027233478,0.000022451353,0.022921784,0.000954597,0.000003904272,0.93261313,0.03537879,0.00031001391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015760569,0.00009575619,0.21506803,0.00007870609,0.000020586205,0.00006490771,0.049885537,0.00078309077,0.0000021555836,0.24414162,0.48810148,0.0001820729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002374677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033829632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96357214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046111838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076980336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.626757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557603865","doi":"10.1177/1354066116679244","title":"Artificial persons and attributed actions: How to interpret action-sentences about states","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Attributive; Literal and figurative language; Linguistics; Typology; State (computer science); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10019829356134309,"score_gpt":0.2927816586436426,"score_spread":0.1925833650822995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557603865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4131709,0.00049299747,0.028155692,0.4161527,0.008142674,0.00028403415,0.0011096315,0.000098848635,0.13239253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98631173,0.00009355077,0.00027216107,0.00047769625,0.0015842594,0.0000015776485,0.0000089524165,0.000013776045,0.01123627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989582,0.00015772239,0.00035716008,0.000120773824,0.0002697439,0.00013644925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888724,0.0003746738,0.00014054391,0.000068962676,0.0003523002,0.0001762918],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028991955,0.000104162755,0.00011814787,0.0001975901,0.00020732157,0.0002013257,0.00018491363,0.000014555292,0.002518975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006116007,0.00006603903,0.00010926176,0.00004068896,0.0001706099,0.0004765176,0.000047653517,0.00016178949,0.00027461597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026546366,0.0003001266,0.0017443128,0.0000073246447,0.0005654542,0.0000644081,0.009121087,0.00004896111,0.0013515467,0.84090745,0.104760766,0.040863115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002637907,0.00019855982,0.0039670975,0.00020074606,0.000039011444,0.000053102107,0.0013338863,0.000051812607,0.00013709391,0.0122141335,0.98141235,0.0001283907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004383539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001946152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8766516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005292877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019234012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558789901","doi":"10.1177/1354066116679878","title":"Habits of peace: Long-term regional cooperation in Southeast Asia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Toleration; International relations; Southeast asia; Political science; State (computer science); Association (psychology); Development economics; Territorial integrity; Political economy; Economic growth; Sociology; Politics; Law; Psychology; Sovereignty; Ethnology","score_opus":0.02989245226162222,"score_gpt":0.3115690501547431,"score_spread":0.2816765978931209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558789901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7678108,0.00050570857,0.012000916,0.014575462,0.0010528597,0.00010820818,0.000028576598,0.000018812429,0.20389864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936086,0.00047533982,0.00047253782,0.000028901331,0.0005122248,7.636842e-7,0.000005577563,0.000010935231,0.0048851133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979884,0.00047193203,0.00064570876,0.00011266196,0.00065345794,0.00012784629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825305,0.0002420506,0.00052030606,0.00007901038,0.0008140284,0.00009154894],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017082575,0.00008148395,0.00012477372,0.00033820292,0.000108660766,0.000037164224,0.00043768415,0.000033798064,0.000926568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001275349,0.000063165135,0.00011949336,0.00017664177,0.00018165067,0.0005662931,0.000034459907,0.00017495746,0.00011307949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002869829,0.0005928319,0.4346727,0.0000065737804,0.0002175798,0.0001171222,0.0075872014,0.00059988437,0.010314667,0.4944901,0.031945202,0.01916915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014037327,0.00009669166,0.91201293,0.000610427,0.000016205759,0.000047686106,0.00055916316,0.00004996158,0.0001971196,0.0005122835,0.0843443,0.00014949596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030749234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001719315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49397781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021682424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019775161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603121687","doi":"10.1177/1354066117696561","title":"Kenneth Waltz is not a neorealist (and why that matters)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Waltz; International relations; Epistemology; International relations theory; Sociology; Positivism; Neorealism (international relations); Politics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; History; Art history","score_opus":0.045137809574104876,"score_gpt":0.3347012440820817,"score_spread":0.28956343450797684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603121687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014452165,0.00008163278,0.00508934,0.07853315,0.00074285205,0.000073066185,0.000053385196,0.000018899325,0.9009555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716728,0.00030498023,0.0016895209,0.0032453602,0.00091827003,8.1631424e-7,0.000005803718,0.000018007859,0.02214447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985293,0.00017640043,0.00038867508,0.00012276466,0.00062894274,0.00015388225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821,0.00016413926,0.00077408424,0.00017959616,0.0005171028,0.00015508902],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012162144,0.0000982515,0.000114956274,0.00023208419,0.0011278298,0.0005350616,0.0007413633,0.000036807105,0.0012502659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008910165,0.00009039267,0.0001345207,0.00004223378,0.00035321596,0.0008940427,0.00010218562,0.00027018637,0.00022895345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040733266,0.000045533394,0.01343072,0.0000017886664,0.0001620236,0.00006578283,0.0049959733,0.000046795023,0.00004429886,0.7908381,0.18587227,0.0044559715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005218491,0.000035862777,0.13492131,0.000078205245,0.000029783097,0.000055852306,0.0003843907,0.00026658725,0.000021949652,0.011451594,0.85211647,0.00011615054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028796348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000063368956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9572206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012060822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010021962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740336102","doi":"10.1177/1354066117720794","title":"Norm structure, diffusion, and evolution: A conceptual approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; Conceptual framework; International relations; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Social science; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.023659883895750203,"score_gpt":0.29860033161809735,"score_spread":0.27494044772234716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740336102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10176819,0.00013769763,0.014555756,0.0020306678,0.00060189056,0.00007143483,0.000030293315,0.00001580702,0.88078827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843267,0.00006438454,0.0037655483,0.00007668011,0.0012149796,5.4542534e-7,0.000007219546,0.000011663545,0.010532256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998639,0.0001723171,0.00039528988,0.000112195834,0.0005525944,0.00012859695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822813,0.0000990285,0.00067491486,0.00014749348,0.00071432936,0.00013610875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076855836,0.0000867124,0.00010511309,0.00019836568,0.0012959248,0.00029282004,0.000620701,0.000039387513,0.000479279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016836153,0.00007730047,0.00009097247,0.000052463573,0.0006020128,0.00077716756,0.000101613936,0.00026810382,0.000052821586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015061883,0.00003359888,0.025416225,5.884015e-7,0.00006281734,0.000011813881,0.002697305,0.000106590865,0.0000399861,0.96715504,0.0034900934,0.00097087794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011903741,0.00007591123,0.733036,0.000062820036,0.000046020443,0.00013169029,0.0026932738,0.0010792215,0.0000048576817,0.036921855,0.22456338,0.00019462136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070137874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002429402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9302332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015886535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016038875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743189496","doi":"10.1177/1354066117714529","title":"Reflective practices at the Security Council: Children and armed conflict and the three United Nations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London; Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Mandate; Public relations; Public administration; Peacekeeping; International security; Law","score_opus":0.07051874313191579,"score_gpt":0.35902016255803343,"score_spread":0.2885014194261176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743189496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5174937,0.0014046114,0.00016814735,0.059805527,0.000437364,0.00017371567,0.000036423047,0.000012375786,0.4204681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906346,0.0044698003,0.00013983398,0.00027443995,0.00052542303,0.0000019329111,0.0000057430684,0.000008094494,0.003940082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980404,0.000649787,0.00030301424,0.00011915316,0.0007838563,0.00010383942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587876,0.0012938489,0.0014251778,0.00015996343,0.0011649173,0.00007733581],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004990481,0.00008328898,0.00009666599,0.00018314457,0.0030793946,0.0005380525,0.0006701664,0.000026286465,0.00015392408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015768271,0.00005073026,0.0000706976,0.00014353528,0.0011818608,0.00063067494,0.00018298862,0.00039134556,0.000021033724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035355048,0.00008565031,0.05129921,0.0000014511443,0.000704652,0.00001626712,0.031026252,0.000095179,0.00005354477,0.8543948,0.06078917,0.001180257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012521925,0.000027826232,0.42889547,0.000041716485,0.000066958084,0.000089588706,0.0006306098,0.00031800912,0.000005872363,0.0045830044,0.564012,0.00007677348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001226094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045634774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8498118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020071924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016432385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752080778","doi":"10.1177/1354066117725156","title":"Diplomacy, agency, and the logic of improvisation and virtuosity in practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Habitus; Sociology; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Diplomacy; Politics; Practice theory; Rationality; Bricolage; Norm (philosophy); Social science; Law; Political science; Cultural capital","score_opus":0.022683174170863497,"score_gpt":0.35182532250596626,"score_spread":0.32914214833510275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752080778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14286625,0.00017481296,0.0023078972,0.012089836,0.0001772631,0.0001091018,0.0000076506085,0.000004191445,0.842263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969666,0.00055014924,0.0012119532,0.00012939084,0.00019247855,7.1591836e-7,0.0000010807482,0.0000048151533,0.00094279664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998756,0.0003849414,0.00038867389,0.000067626264,0.00033011855,0.00007264301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982101,0.00054209074,0.0006465507,0.00009353977,0.0004628116,0.00004491823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030572582,0.00005061541,0.000090292626,0.00011410427,0.00043961717,0.00013453372,0.00031882894,0.000021729778,0.000045973644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00672463,0.00003719005,0.000049383085,0.00004494034,0.00054282666,0.00078651647,0.000080247475,0.00019313229,0.0000068661816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007120644,0.000028542345,0.015565871,8.3187774e-7,0.00004147529,0.000008594065,0.0041519324,0.000046215675,0.000031528853,0.9774138,0.00013339675,0.0025066286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019676788,0.00006578588,0.87122864,0.00007590783,0.000055378598,0.00005102045,0.0013799857,0.0012354653,0.000009933619,0.10529516,0.018555025,0.000080009944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026393565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053533426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8721186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005768828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008826976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8050496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775570581","doi":"10.1177/1354066117744867","title":"Weapons of mass participation: Social media, violence entrepreneurs, and the politics of crowdfunding for war","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Hawai'i at Mānoa; Nationale Genossenschaft für die Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle; Arab Council for the Social Sciences; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Geopolitics; Context (archaeology); Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; State (computer science); Political economy; Sovereignty; Law; Organised crime; Islam; Political science; Law and economics; Criminology","score_opus":0.04868596698425926,"score_gpt":0.35148712949675726,"score_spread":0.302801162512498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775570581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65452087,0.00022615855,0.015820459,0.010614995,0.0013123325,0.00014915122,0.0001125133,0.0000064555375,0.31723705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983783,0.00009909976,0.0005701808,0.000035589288,0.0004649766,7.9105604e-7,0.0000012649375,0.000003787233,0.00044603023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988914,0.0003601626,0.00036509387,0.00005048295,0.00022844173,0.000104400344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730635,0.0015653012,0.00061416865,0.00007692677,0.00038219802,0.000055083205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001668683,0.000041232037,0.00011877664,0.00004784659,0.00063263107,0.00002435102,0.0003694019,0.000024419254,0.00009461528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007782749,0.00003134679,0.00010295713,0.00002142394,0.0011898348,0.0001773946,0.000039726743,0.00010910191,0.0000028582447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004792931,0.000018239429,0.00531117,0.0000017704817,0.0000527361,0.000001409993,0.0031359957,0.000020472264,0.00002028451,0.99077624,0.00010374186,0.00051001605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015889334,0.000043218108,0.19327429,0.0001110944,0.00010307067,0.000003660682,0.0019477956,0.00021263138,0.00026073898,0.79990256,0.0024852725,0.00006675874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009231349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035919988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34385738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024029083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079938996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93172395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896391625","doi":"10.1177/1354066118796540","title":"Implementation in practice: The use of force to protect civilians in United Nations peacekeeping","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies","keywords":"Peacekeeping; Normative; Ambiguity; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Politics; Agency (philosophy); International relations; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Public relations; Social science","score_opus":0.06492846736884614,"score_gpt":0.3994835289431762,"score_spread":0.33455506157433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896391625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7794767,0.00009367304,0.022581596,0.052404396,0.0010768255,0.0006513991,0.00003642833,0.000020654412,0.14365834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928636,0.0001514516,0.0049021584,0.00036014526,0.0002955828,0.0000040989225,0.000006311951,0.000008966167,0.0014077055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771386,0.0008518133,0.0006394028,0.000094954274,0.0005704103,0.00012958172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975117,0.0007352962,0.00048909645,0.00008123748,0.0011277745,0.00005490499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028046912,0.000063336716,0.000082098944,0.0016799049,0.0002013834,0.00008481061,0.0003905292,0.000019920086,0.00021545813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006699804,0.000055622957,0.000059642298,0.0016450183,0.00011407545,0.00084776344,0.0000496983,0.00026008728,0.000032143875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004456536,0.0007165049,0.085010074,0.000008496157,0.0003233291,0.00007813465,0.1516702,0.031895347,0.003950202,0.67898285,0.032646038,0.014273164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007794625,0.00017945211,0.17855951,0.00034501622,0.000020261647,0.000019000761,0.009195838,0.0015540043,0.0001575054,0.00048275705,0.808584,0.00012322247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014559572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0088810455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7759379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002615421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015078677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80207753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954865040","doi":"10.1177/1354066119859642","title":"The absence of great power responsibility in global environmental politics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Responsibility to protect; International relations theory; Human rights; International relations; Global governance; Constructivism (international relations); Great power; Sustainable development; Environmental politics; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Law","score_opus":0.00920911301210765,"score_gpt":0.28143625083959734,"score_spread":0.2722271378274897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954865040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6835631,0.000077237346,0.000028556256,0.0013144232,0.00029949233,0.000042133313,0.000020626656,0.0000014804043,0.31465295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919107,0.00008464333,0.00017631044,0.00006448742,0.00007945368,1.2687485e-7,0.000001205515,0.0000037385641,0.0076793134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868524,0.0004077726,0.0003571931,0.000059183698,0.0003873059,0.00010331661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993453,0.0002476229,0.00023164428,0.000093805116,0.000026366333,0.000055243898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011694173,0.000045074208,0.000062237195,0.00003738187,0.00010681677,0.000020840225,0.00031659735,0.000015966758,0.0008268982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002864962,0.00003498026,0.000072970506,0.000066574416,0.00023638867,0.0001678923,0.000044798526,0.00012989827,0.00022218311],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046252277,0.000070750066,0.7775327,5.186673e-7,0.000024924788,0.0000123690525,0.0017952544,0.00026992307,0.00023977707,0.2188264,0.0005109802,0.00067017024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023440254,0.00005104232,0.86556476,0.000020223793,0.0000021759777,0.000008521395,0.00078737416,0.000009457716,0.000013687916,0.0023631605,0.13090801,0.000037161415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005468555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056292258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3083476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029739703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006793589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90539557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989307395","doi":"10.1177/1354066119883688","title":"Transforming refugees into migrants: institutional change and the politics of international protection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Harvard Kennedy School; International Development Research Centre; Carnegie Corporation of New York","keywords":"Refugee; Immigration; Political science; Convention; Inclusion–exclusion principle; Politics; Refugee law; Limiting; Political economy; Inclusion (mineral); Development economics; Sociology; Public administration; Economic growth; Law; Gender studies; Economics","score_opus":0.02413507645258419,"score_gpt":0.28307488962231997,"score_spread":0.2589398131697358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989307395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8210541,0.0010270221,0.032967996,0.01870676,0.0039488375,0.0007994772,0.00003926644,0.000030235955,0.1214263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99407685,0.0004616912,0.0009232792,0.00014768122,0.00091422506,0.000005573021,0.000017824843,0.000010010254,0.0034428851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980457,0.00040471356,0.0006404012,0.00011061755,0.00069226394,0.00010630214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837327,0.00015210413,0.00052403583,0.000082442944,0.00080497813,0.00006319626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019486179,0.00009503354,0.00014310838,0.0002870963,0.0003596854,0.00008665393,0.00034554064,0.0000422754,0.00047340943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007327428,0.00006911703,0.00012705462,0.00015952825,0.00035007004,0.0010444738,0.00002544553,0.0002597711,0.000038489543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025834466,0.000121840894,0.011624061,0.000015280813,0.00025623996,0.0000052115065,0.055808563,0.0003222572,0.0012667798,0.9136173,0.0009691161,0.015735002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003020565,0.00018863565,0.035797086,0.0003751574,0.00007080159,0.00007662514,0.005085332,0.0021174236,0.00030920535,0.007706536,0.9450524,0.00020025494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034770675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031958352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9440833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001572233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015670141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5183501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089379721","doi":"10.1177/1354066120938843","title":"Domestic courts, transnational law, and international order","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Law; Sovereignty; Political science; Municipal law; Extraterritoriality; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.03355747996606828,"score_gpt":0.29905330554225196,"score_spread":0.2654958255761837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089379721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0112677775,0.0003726455,0.017961543,0.21446352,0.0015250269,0.0000816394,0.000038841274,0.00003207646,0.75425696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936774,0.00019434902,0.0021832034,0.0020316383,0.0011945871,7.7814224e-7,0.000008777545,0.000008197611,0.00070106576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986415,0.00016241445,0.00039524699,0.00011209039,0.00058439694,0.000104364655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985634,0.00018860673,0.00021965697,0.000028767989,0.0008364168,0.00016312592],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056167797,0.00008221438,0.000107698994,0.000086502136,0.00037931727,0.00009945914,0.000316769,0.000021769221,0.0010879342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082852505,0.00007746332,0.00007662843,0.00013552968,0.00039077172,0.00043204852,0.00004649943,0.00020876405,0.00007822567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036183214,0.00003662231,0.0024249877,7.230755e-7,0.00014839639,0.000048304963,0.002615966,0.00039261006,0.000047308877,0.98970336,0.0033591723,0.001186397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000818965,0.00006834825,0.022483138,0.000027750908,0.000046433517,0.00005415673,0.0012418033,0.00025180922,0.0000034918344,0.019336678,0.95552516,0.00014227335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026468771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003946041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007140227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017044219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183972239","doi":"10.1177/13540661211024713","title":"Decolonizing Self-Determination: Haudenosaunee Passports and Negotiated Sovereignty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Self-determination; Plural; Westphalian sovereignty; Sociology; Negotiation; Articulation (sociology); Law; Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.013286648973284897,"score_gpt":0.2832183109301146,"score_spread":0.2699316619568297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183972239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33755693,0.00042168467,0.0011805048,0.0024621293,0.0020625328,0.00009272807,0.0000058025853,0.00003227659,0.6561854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755059,0.002527829,0.005931538,0.00009560136,0.0010388913,1.9769854e-7,0.000014663707,0.0000147395485,0.014870654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982762,0.0005097373,0.00048966845,0.00012174904,0.00044258081,0.00016009036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795026,0.00021966794,0.0004373664,0.000080919766,0.0011544841,0.00015733429],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013216635,0.00007695127,0.000107148066,0.00015955711,0.0017828039,0.00013936053,0.00018022463,0.000039044575,0.0010702569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012157513,0.0000722665,0.000070494185,0.00019354247,0.00007608803,0.0004925839,0.000004005911,0.00022251968,0.00006933021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025875266,0.00052674673,0.030404419,0.000018312925,0.00024322326,0.0007984446,0.2718673,0.00013301296,0.000029116156,0.689358,0.003105946,0.003489618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041509193,0.00004487474,0.07678497,0.000086095795,0.000042748623,0.00023000898,0.0031121073,0.00008263087,0.000047049445,0.0026602526,0.91636735,0.00012679918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018585345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070850933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9132614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023105662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038896883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220871438","doi":"10.1177/13540661221084870","title":"Committed sponsors: external support overtness and civilian targeting in civil wars","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Politics; Incentive; Political economy; State (computer science); Political science; Spanish Civil War; Affect (linguistics); Public support; Law and economics; Law; Social psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.01728086219411531,"score_gpt":0.2871376760763408,"score_spread":0.2698568138822255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220871438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5868668,0.0003228931,0.0009307531,0.007802678,0.0009827095,0.00007549402,0.00003822329,0.000014931697,0.40296555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890413,0.00005876056,0.00036389017,0.00040802106,0.00027591607,0.0000011184472,0.000003525091,0.000010302639,0.009837118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979955,0.000684338,0.00043970437,0.00009349756,0.0006111646,0.00017581102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991166,0.00027951022,0.00029173182,0.000052638647,0.00013789523,0.00012163626],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023458751,0.000066156375,0.00010379255,0.00017423063,0.00033405432,0.00006202058,0.00037135207,0.00001266367,0.0032008672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011112982,0.00006997603,0.00006532471,0.00017336612,0.00009689398,0.00032138155,0.00011599558,0.00043051032,0.000030627354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032661774,0.0004676423,0.36806342,0.000007676976,0.00013201668,0.0015939125,0.03955689,0.0028530438,0.00065031374,0.5240169,0.057352323,0.0049792468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006055504,0.00006632437,0.23954488,0.00003943399,0.000008145712,0.000053078827,0.0018291613,0.000268999,0.0000045531046,0.0016255621,0.75585294,0.00010134019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013935087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000117576776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69850063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021370506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016155085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99771035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281760713","doi":"10.1177/13540661221095970","title":"Civil war as a social process: actors and dynamics from pre- to post-war","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University College London; Université de Montréal; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Demobilization; Radicalization; Political economy; Militarization; Spanish Civil War; Social dynamics; Civil society; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Social movement; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.011993907582194065,"score_gpt":0.300430447686819,"score_spread":0.28843654010462494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281760713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81126374,0.00009021778,0.00060303893,0.02312743,0.00073153677,0.000070934664,0.00019536026,0.000015048563,0.16390271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917249,0.000019204746,0.00016504644,0.0009648239,0.0005534248,0.0000016292436,0.000011497576,0.000011683844,0.0065477532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854416,0.00026773245,0.00028363868,0.000098850775,0.0006699333,0.00013569521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990915,0.0001676461,0.00023767805,0.000041356605,0.00031169123,0.0001501444],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005726167,0.00006449279,0.00008719796,0.00009773753,0.0005525418,0.000045179044,0.00037642298,0.00001468149,0.0015260816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012536919,0.00006585379,0.000068380315,0.00014126443,0.00007698983,0.0002605998,0.00010193765,0.00030470983,0.000058390833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006693126,0.00057378877,0.06361423,0.000007697413,0.00062523957,0.0003772607,0.40506977,0.0015089501,0.00052484387,0.47901678,0.030917415,0.01709472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071005744,0.0002916257,0.27485067,0.000041343934,0.00005024433,0.000026780575,0.020887557,0.00037679833,0.0000087300805,0.009524024,0.6929924,0.00023978847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032920518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028044663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.662075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026684764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022104238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307693719","doi":"10.1177/13540661221133976","title":"Kant’s domestic analogy: international and global order","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Analogy; International relations; Politics; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Geopolitics; Globe; Sociology; Global politics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.011929272210211218,"score_gpt":0.3009665054008346,"score_spread":0.28903723319062335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307693719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2940829,0.00042449744,0.0055045406,0.033708148,0.0050742486,0.000102978265,0.00015309073,0.000034586465,0.660915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939712,0.00014676993,0.001465106,0.0004814602,0.0003899584,7.586845e-7,0.000019813402,0.0000070265314,0.0035179015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982708,0.0004265745,0.00035782054,0.000105608466,0.0007126726,0.00012651956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989936,0.00009777296,0.0002968738,0.000059756883,0.00043905462,0.000112941816],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012333097,0.00006981984,0.00008929558,0.00014557729,0.00047670343,0.00010412007,0.0005179253,0.000015052647,0.0017672337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008151066,0.000073658855,0.00007486919,0.00026092213,0.00013026611,0.0003012062,0.00016971775,0.00028599348,0.000050848532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015876262,0.00041501148,0.11611041,0.0000024846493,0.00055886316,0.0009293458,0.013670869,0.0151413875,0.00003912866,0.7777275,0.06284433,0.012401939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000780827,0.0001067227,0.072341144,0.000015610862,0.000037843038,0.00039371804,0.00579475,0.0015314721,1.2363279e-7,0.0078671975,0.91099477,0.00013584853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007900686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013724148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84815043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034480248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019030533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307812879","doi":"10.1177/13540661221133194","title":"The contested meaning-making of diplomatic norms: competence in practice in Southeast Asian multilateralism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; Multilateralism; CONTEST; Sociology; Rhetorical question; Political science; Political economy; China; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.020194727305490743,"score_gpt":0.32234877351440666,"score_spread":0.3021540462089159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307812879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33873987,0.0007322233,0.00075485767,0.024856541,0.0016406723,0.00023709727,0.000030713752,0.000020132089,0.6329879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849075,0.00007573712,0.00076736795,0.00009696584,0.00010003759,0.0000024053238,0.0000024299388,0.00000875123,0.00045552975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689025,0.0013608147,0.0007367608,0.00008803349,0.0007908193,0.00013335451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977779,0.0009227974,0.000812699,0.000076179225,0.00037683087,0.00003362863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00403582,0.00006571811,0.00011228239,0.00026987493,0.00035197157,0.00006788051,0.0006738913,0.000011778834,0.0001406632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004426747,0.00005641176,0.00007818762,0.00030429108,0.00012417561,0.00043135593,0.00010264345,0.0005017863,0.000010784642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043283257,0.00080146967,0.07698783,0.0000057398242,0.00025504772,0.00042831546,0.20230137,0.03859018,0.00061618804,0.66987723,0.002291701,0.007412118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029651455,0.00027981141,0.34074223,0.00085722783,0.000051315095,0.00026468444,0.15254748,0.010490258,0.000016527454,0.0058108824,0.48560852,0.00036592683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020220065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005233067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6640663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029898027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013673936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5299549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388993498","doi":"10.1177/13540661231210931","title":"Hidden figures: how legal experts influence the design of international institutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legalization; Delegate; Law and economics; Normative; Principal (computer security); Political science; Scholarship; Politics; Sociology; Public relations; Economics; Law; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.044509126659106606,"score_gpt":0.260695122759955,"score_spread":0.21618599610084838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388993498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13756475,0.00016084065,0.0406588,0.06197125,0.007999653,0.00043154502,0.000040032042,0.00015701307,0.75101614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874297,0.00007459635,0.0010868025,0.0036869482,0.0018978935,0.000006000237,0.000058706042,0.0000230342,0.0057363613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981933,0.00008289928,0.0006267564,0.000121843535,0.00082115154,0.00015400196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976652,0.00019367451,0.00081381394,0.00014420824,0.0011578805,0.000025179832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011518876,0.00014067425,0.00012675827,0.000660697,0.00021770944,0.00034107387,0.0008986964,0.000026641499,0.00054965203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015535051,0.00010402048,0.00017177503,0.00047169172,0.00015028575,0.0029017539,0.00015489197,0.00022542872,0.0005993133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007387115,0.000142472,0.0053163064,0.000008053308,0.00029832876,0.000059689868,0.00034460318,0.026485704,0.0024162724,0.756004,0.20845175,0.00039900397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075728557,0.000031041538,0.04146029,0.00016189343,0.00004462467,0.00006270179,0.0005576448,0.010927949,0.00015667704,0.0015997951,0.9440695,0.00017057372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015047922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034978862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8498649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007852884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009450976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77031595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408677922","doi":"10.1177/13540661251327108","title":"International relations and the revolutionary geopolitics of the European New Right","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Geopolitics; International relations; Political science; International relations theory; Political economy; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.0107395602400109,"score_gpt":0.2772872748032222,"score_spread":0.2665477145632113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408677922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020350968,0.00033819908,0.0068057356,0.03640782,0.0030789373,0.00015464592,0.000023149663,0.00001655476,0.932824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8755076,0.00017273184,0.0014676787,0.0004915912,0.0007846599,6.30447e-7,0.0000061674627,0.00001345162,0.121555515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968212,0.0014227341,0.0007728268,0.00012362684,0.00071860827,0.00014095889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791217,0.0005232925,0.00068913196,0.00019269602,0.0005980585,0.00008466941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027623922,0.00010231551,0.00012866876,0.00023366256,0.00064332166,0.00007390619,0.0010795303,0.000027417454,0.000685888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024593058,0.00006590249,0.00019244346,0.00029729088,0.0006149472,0.00037759135,0.00022730719,0.00039921218,0.0000753916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033713008,0.000060443974,0.014734668,0.0000015491254,0.0002763262,0.000009164537,0.0034365377,0.00047911148,0.00002264681,0.8840231,0.09533472,0.001588035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014272997,0.000012219453,0.23542209,0.0002073168,0.00008982847,0.000016488544,0.00058455206,0.00017090516,0.000013160106,0.0625082,0.699468,0.00007994125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012478088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006124077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8551566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021479605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034548753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7509993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414044684","doi":"10.1177/13540661251370265","title":"Infrastructuring public-private relations: Big Tech, the Ukraine War and implications to security governance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Defence Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Geopolitics; Corporate governance; International relations; Big data; State (computer science); Politics; Ambiguity; Dominance (genetics); Globalization","score_opus":0.015008917877586252,"score_gpt":0.28092275194008215,"score_spread":0.2659138340624959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414044684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19399911,0.0017703506,0.010426491,0.27716565,0.0015244242,0.00029991425,0.000055455435,0.00005476262,0.51470387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99455893,0.00083402754,0.0009801355,0.00060220534,0.0003738682,0.000004149718,0.0000025812722,0.000008015472,0.002636105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986252,0.00028041867,0.00046054268,0.00013521427,0.00034230604,0.00015630054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998526,0.00038920424,0.00030171758,0.00015043399,0.0005375045,0.00009516275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001290765,0.0000934073,0.000108306296,0.00018493106,0.0011396694,0.00014263719,0.00053688115,0.000027257278,0.00015038259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032013971,0.00007626847,0.00008416787,0.00053919974,0.00024019477,0.00035763733,0.00020040153,0.00036187927,0.00004397688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014942499,0.000046342437,0.023469295,0.0000024374526,0.0002066022,0.000005750043,0.018284528,0.00025781608,0.000050403538,0.90628225,0.030255739,0.021123873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021196892,0.000015295896,0.27882794,0.0000707943,0.000025002888,0.000008802489,0.00230597,0.000024959774,0.000005474806,0.020318486,0.6981113,0.00007399562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042602518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041487787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8859638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018684496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015817773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8765531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414810196","doi":"10.1177/13540661251369185","title":"‘Baleful influence’: a conceptual analysis of militarism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Militarism; Appeal; Politics; International relations; Set (abstract data type); Conceptual framework; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.019604197154507903,"score_gpt":0.3141853176067906,"score_spread":0.2945811204522827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414810196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57508683,0.0004694987,0.0049299207,0.0027209246,0.0005613075,0.00004386983,0.00001541744,0.000008948963,0.4161633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99030787,0.000097564385,0.00045086702,0.00018895636,0.00011019317,3.408923e-7,0.000004652027,0.0000035112416,0.0088360375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840915,0.00038879688,0.0005605411,0.00008669848,0.00045798716,0.000096806296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830127,0.00025068683,0.00034736306,0.000093895265,0.00093960884,0.00006719602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001169643,0.000060766437,0.00015981324,0.00063486764,0.00015772916,0.0000342627,0.00046130567,0.00002712764,0.00084586395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012251103,0.000058883492,0.00025716014,0.00073738594,0.00027552096,0.00021915633,0.000040936702,0.00019064247,0.000032691965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066664295,0.0002595839,0.26154003,0.0000039977563,0.0045129387,0.0000453361,0.080941476,0.013000922,0.00039162813,0.62568045,0.009531985,0.0040249606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004288568,0.00004533124,0.6471494,0.000050722974,0.00054095814,0.0000016551946,0.011276607,0.00030956054,0.000018564877,0.0016809647,0.338414,0.000083387626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001575637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016888464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62399954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082289036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024398486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9261617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415959320","doi":"10.1177/13540661251379641","title":"Anachronism and International Relations theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"International relations theory; International relations; Discipline; Reflexivity; Positivism; Anachronism; Mythology; Historical sociology; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy)","score_opus":0.014665686673480111,"score_gpt":0.32474162372899745,"score_spread":0.31007593705551734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415959320","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007164915,0.0003758758,0.045538336,0.011807287,0.0015352049,0.00009108914,0.000021682383,0.000039618262,0.93342596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8351021,0.00022383964,0.002957696,0.00041590148,0.0006476456,0.0000019253741,0.000015039484,0.000013301238,0.16062258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980799,0.00045692123,0.00066525437,0.00015367818,0.000481444,0.00016281863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978806,0.0005280579,0.00042084634,0.00011603105,0.00094105734,0.00011341597],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021178871,0.00011731754,0.00012775663,0.0007924659,0.00054271455,0.00020317094,0.00057803694,0.000057720314,0.0023820293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002259481,0.000115632814,0.00015090643,0.0002945226,0.00030803325,0.00072665606,0.000101584454,0.00038527994,0.00031647782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002991003,0.000056589997,0.005645697,8.7214227e-7,0.00022845514,0.000013828386,0.0015361784,0.00034443208,0.000029571405,0.9573037,0.027012624,0.007798168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008363237,0.000038376027,0.06626231,0.00012958146,0.00006847939,0.00003283596,0.0016751583,0.0006622399,0.0000074885143,0.15535824,0.77478564,0.00014335505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022762635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019148714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8279371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034891508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034835038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}