{"meta":{"query_hash":"8c434c2ab54a","filters":{"venue":"European Journal of Philosophy"},"cohort_total":45,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":45,"exported":45,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8c434c2ab54a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Journal+of+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1606858490","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00458.x","title":"Self‐Constitution: Agency, Identity and Integrity, by Christine Korsgaard","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Identity (music); Constitution; Citation; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.12511658115560717,"score_gpt":0.32704721619681787,"score_spread":0.2019306350412107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606858490","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007184517,0.5109436,0.005719211,0.34905353,0.011905108,0.000028156874,0.000096279466,0.000037982772,0.11503168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5076172,0.3018871,0.009489449,0.045575846,0.012675532,0.00016339701,0.00014720697,0.00022318841,0.1222211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980394,0.0009465467,0.000114903734,0.0003784878,0.00040222745,0.00011837561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972703,0.002091634,0.0001167411,0.00010481765,0.0002680835,0.00014841039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00393098,0.0007906827,0.0008819372,0.0012190192,0.003983106,0.007713083,0.00097179227,0.003996378,0.0019098086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008165056,0.00060179515,0.0003470762,0.0013739307,0.014438492,0.008559476,0.0030825066,0.007954315,0.00066991465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047863778,0.000027706394,0.00022598996,0.00028945852,0.000022626524,0.00014855027,0.010091122,0.000606101,0.00013608685,0.82250357,0.141215,0.024685865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017725919,0.000013989231,0.00067854807,0.0008269791,0.000014564447,0.00035727405,0.0048506507,0.0006348653,0.00018066991,0.36494243,0.62744325,0.000038958904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0120441755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01160942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0120441755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037159156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003484315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026960969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1619109582","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00375.x","title":"Identification, Meaning, and the Normativity of Social Roles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Meaning (existential); Normative; Identification (biology); Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03741833030012211,"score_gpt":0.30376812354538885,"score_spread":0.26634979324526675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1619109582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32928064,0.0019857455,0.13823612,0.027635302,0.00061660726,0.00011447617,0.00007213817,0.000092169474,0.5019668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941936,0.00012771103,0.0035517905,0.0002718623,0.00004145664,0.0000443292,0.000009680444,0.000008887656,0.001750782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752955,0.018704934,0.00084530155,0.0016952667,0.0024918616,0.0009670224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869489,0.007243252,0.0018342264,0.001515021,0.0015298418,0.0009287131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019051095,0.00035383826,0.00044567382,0.0013795254,0.006054184,0.007472139,0.0009855697,0.0027111226,0.0027197278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015690837,0.00033028304,0.00041531975,0.0008849305,0.05659822,0.009951323,0.0061596963,0.002434412,0.00032488746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126073555,0.000011403076,0.0003762187,0.000014585204,0.000002331686,0.000021193131,0.0056043835,0.00012062091,0.000083966,0.9916304,0.00020731741,0.001915019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017298182,0.000018526534,0.000575371,0.00004757996,0.0000039668407,0.00007077639,0.0041784546,0.0007056147,0.00018831507,0.9841562,0.010025729,0.000012251821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017026359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012125284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019051095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037834244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030573774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10075301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1630121611","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12033","title":"What Is Social Construction?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Task (project management); Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Trait; Social constructionism; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.028944922382972162,"score_gpt":0.28475352423726097,"score_spread":0.25580860185428883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1630121611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08559543,0.021907706,0.0902569,0.22552764,0.0023625838,0.00009171432,0.0003279968,0.0003919828,0.57353806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881144,0.002944333,0.0028342174,0.0021051161,0.0006871259,0.000048934842,0.00009192547,0.00006750632,0.0031064714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98966545,0.006685301,0.00024050941,0.0014907765,0.0013131074,0.00060485915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867981,0.008344463,0.0009326017,0.0021673725,0.0010936528,0.0006637886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008023227,0.00044264633,0.0007761262,0.0025447686,0.004078132,0.010544691,0.0011562037,0.0025732766,0.0065960926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011587468,0.00030648345,0.0005627901,0.0022865129,0.06718085,0.013115511,0.0040787733,0.0033584165,0.00077291665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005060004,0.0000060721145,0.00041595986,0.000044767778,0.000008831546,0.000025427202,0.0016257479,0.00013222487,0.000034445846,0.9925047,0.0013440802,0.003852715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038185367,0.0000036649667,0.00040172576,0.000067580695,0.0000033161598,0.000031068343,0.0014599477,0.00022678239,0.000041036936,0.9782241,0.019532325,0.0000047645894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030564724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013556818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010544691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045047305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027978336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042431414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767128526","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00344.x","title":"Fichte's Voluntarism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntarism (philosophy); Ambiguity; Normative; Philosophy; Epistemology; Reading (process); Virtue; Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04099479778610383,"score_gpt":0.22951792431733367,"score_spread":0.18852312653122985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767128526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060489662,0.0032237445,0.09385798,0.0655805,0.0012747094,0.00009701219,0.00008463667,0.00014642942,0.7752454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96565986,0.00049939036,0.0067767343,0.0042729774,0.00042635232,0.000112402224,0.00003559076,0.00006503134,0.022151558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915549,0.0037811778,0.0003319986,0.0013975038,0.0023063694,0.0006280079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98989457,0.00596344,0.0006662539,0.0017649224,0.0013273781,0.00038342693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010151166,0.0004166003,0.0005501062,0.0013081309,0.0041873585,0.00432863,0.0014085975,0.0053869947,0.0058840243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014656574,0.00030329797,0.0007162075,0.00075791817,0.026279083,0.008241237,0.0046625948,0.005208417,0.0009147915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033671874,0.0000041009102,0.00003916422,0.0000064829073,0.000001310176,0.000017379596,0.0006984548,0.000050764404,0.000024602623,0.9975037,0.0007707073,0.00088001805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000088284105,0.000009761076,0.00012264385,0.000046949288,0.0000030825424,0.000085848544,0.0002476262,0.0005493162,0.00017557887,0.97548485,0.023256944,0.000008577272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017062236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091632025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010151166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053296187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025112424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05368513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767433069","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00538.x","title":"Reflective Rationality and the Claim of <i><scp>D</scp>ialectic of <scp>E</scp>nlightenment</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Enlightenment; Criticism; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Focus (optics); Core (optical fiber); Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Social science; Physics","score_opus":0.045757609987603455,"score_gpt":0.31076498453230494,"score_spread":0.26500737454470147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767433069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088776685,0.007598438,0.059295855,0.17040849,0.0007350173,0.00006720989,0.000044516455,0.00011977071,0.67295396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804662,0.0012120072,0.0031209746,0.0032987287,0.00020379199,0.00003826893,0.000012455673,0.00003942205,0.011608115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886996,0.0073767775,0.0002759659,0.0009615278,0.001762365,0.00092375535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98472625,0.010315399,0.0017612921,0.0013325352,0.0011795012,0.00068504346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010745534,0.00041553142,0.00047341388,0.001458327,0.005083803,0.014332227,0.001872272,0.005766558,0.0018014266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0153900925,0.0004159049,0.0005833444,0.0015154572,0.0847607,0.008575713,0.0059407395,0.0070832632,0.00037158272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042305933,0.0000061788146,0.00005883445,0.000013505956,0.0000027447154,0.00002373776,0.0028749043,0.00018161543,0.000033018307,0.99493814,0.0009078996,0.00095528114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008357986,0.000006887009,0.00012342371,0.000059003658,0.0000038139665,0.000030630697,0.0019855218,0.0004554858,0.0001578484,0.97986573,0.017295498,0.000007717668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004800834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030014405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014332227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008690417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074589415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06305367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893143918","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2008.00340.x","title":"Indeterminacy, A Priority, and Analyticity in the Quinean Critique","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Criticism; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.028492220899522924,"score_gpt":0.32162412766552356,"score_spread":0.29313190676600065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893143918","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057536878,0.031708866,0.13386315,0.46858025,0.0033183245,0.00006425336,0.00011000576,0.00015032994,0.30466807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667762,0.0032663888,0.010438881,0.010400396,0.00186397,0.00007494514,0.000024352017,0.00010760878,0.0070473845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.983868,0.011597175,0.00046254956,0.0010349868,0.0025527389,0.00048449982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669626,0.025507068,0.0013238551,0.0017416157,0.0036843505,0.0007804688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022800863,0.0004849413,0.00086988736,0.0025740932,0.0054021943,0.009577425,0.00212305,0.0037188914,0.003884268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028037263,0.00035494068,0.0006812097,0.0017588765,0.04597866,0.00979861,0.004901183,0.0060443413,0.00045339874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010435464,0.0000038770913,0.00007945574,0.000029300772,0.000003077656,0.000017543694,0.0010351131,0.00015507931,0.000017701552,0.9954947,0.0016340641,0.001519536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009123118,0.0000040979585,0.000088912326,0.000059372192,0.0000031489767,0.000020919122,0.00053549476,0.0005058413,0.000049070874,0.98820376,0.010514278,0.000005954011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038667491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031263104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022800863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065868073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046501504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12058395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921503942","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00469.x","title":"Can We Be Self‐Deceived about What We Believe? Self‐Knowledge, Self‐Deception, and Rational Agency","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Self-deception; Order (exchange); Relation (database); Self-knowledge; Epistemology; Content (measure theory); Social psychology; Psychology; Self; Common knowledge (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09298263487289923,"score_gpt":0.2563550489335183,"score_spread":0.16337241406061906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921503942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3820147,0.009472437,0.07835999,0.16500501,0.00065309205,0.00006573426,0.000118493874,0.000120036064,0.3641905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569714,0.000458741,0.0012160616,0.0010489961,0.00004042158,0.000010205848,0.000010024709,0.0000053723215,0.0015128574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937028,0.0039772866,0.00022757579,0.00059992523,0.0010084175,0.00048389522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761189,0.014450017,0.0036568865,0.0030497138,0.0021117239,0.0006126755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007324283,0.0003119971,0.00047949693,0.0009022532,0.0021384472,0.0053097866,0.0009469706,0.004908938,0.003145752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027368689,0.00026415146,0.00048090584,0.0006269018,0.024878396,0.0087308,0.0028039534,0.0051917518,0.00041489355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075742064,0.0000544883,0.0030471422,0.00007650199,0.00005253599,0.0008423433,0.011470535,0.0015439612,0.00027482247,0.9682424,0.0026055328,0.011714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016452792,0.000020264473,0.0010420707,0.00008227566,0.000016650703,0.00037959055,0.0029249298,0.0028300998,0.00036921565,0.9817394,0.010553258,0.00002589753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027807106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015059435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007324283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021980216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011247194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038734972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1960060320","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00470.x","title":"The Sortal Dependence of Demonstrative Reference","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Demonstrative; Section (typography); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Analytic philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Contemporary philosophy","score_opus":0.09231159508628632,"score_gpt":0.2930264726876792,"score_spread":0.20071487760139284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1960060320","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11858388,0.0020993233,0.17597145,0.025119068,0.00064240664,0.000045923407,0.00043587462,0.0004943574,0.67660767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860822,0.00029116843,0.0065174643,0.0011487541,0.00016383003,0.000023543238,0.000113344606,0.00008414593,0.005575542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936559,0.0028200683,0.00041243428,0.0009149133,0.0018041149,0.00039251117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834901,0.007933278,0.0010891241,0.0036335033,0.0034081691,0.00044574265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006289947,0.0003196025,0.0004647554,0.0021688608,0.0028579875,0.0053420016,0.0012607457,0.0024135066,0.009916291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016433572,0.00044774843,0.0007466381,0.0020593815,0.021439563,0.014472533,0.005490993,0.0035981762,0.0014219953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001768126,0.000004132058,0.00016145011,0.000029193981,0.000005084123,0.000023990733,0.0010728841,0.000087847744,0.00022910433,0.9944132,0.00087564404,0.0030798356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010720724,0.000014954797,0.00043458026,0.000036572106,0.00001066465,0.00014288617,0.00046843535,0.000642574,0.00057686126,0.9829804,0.014665343,0.000016120764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017201998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008880575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009916291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023075633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009946257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033264816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147140839","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00558.x","title":"Form and Matter in <scp>K</scp>antian Political Philosophy: A Reply","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Politics; Formalism (music); Democracy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.05648923519298995,"score_gpt":0.3074033206871867,"score_spread":0.25091408549419675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147140839","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066989725,0.0060294406,0.0048715454,0.92748064,0.0021037068,0.00000828309,0.00006103601,0.000040844276,0.052705623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56384706,0.010049617,0.0049339095,0.35893586,0.014434709,0.000108598346,0.000114239076,0.00027376946,0.04730213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532783,0.002649057,0.00015052623,0.0006491824,0.00084563484,0.0003777753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883922,0.008411424,0.00052574667,0.0008770454,0.0014140877,0.0003795128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072963787,0.0004211959,0.0007882531,0.0016634278,0.005375675,0.0065289545,0.0017856439,0.013582303,0.007920443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012251127,0.00042995706,0.00085371005,0.0017328968,0.029824348,0.016507162,0.0051360647,0.012011684,0.0016617996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001248256,0.000005770114,0.00008221828,0.000035779904,0.000002958558,0.000026203488,0.0010596354,0.000076835786,0.00003082853,0.9727241,0.02401366,0.0019295333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017764278,0.000006999301,0.00024114428,0.000098024786,0.000004309538,0.000049349554,0.00090579846,0.00027760988,0.00008755817,0.87857974,0.11971859,0.000013090016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066923695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053803865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013582303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005977451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032798948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04336965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170324378","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2007.00274.x","title":"That Which Makes the Sensation of Blue a Mental Fact: Moore on Phenomenal Relationism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Consciousness; Reading (process); Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Relation (database); Aesthetics; Linguistics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.04427498944427264,"score_gpt":0.28872666782177375,"score_spread":0.24445167837750112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170324378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06859783,0.03171897,0.06037299,0.15562208,0.0021432457,0.000060402337,0.00022142836,0.00024997196,0.6810131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97142035,0.0055641043,0.0058854525,0.0053986553,0.0010000323,0.000050940027,0.000029382909,0.00010748396,0.010543536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987172,0.0007308927,0.000035340436,0.00021586735,0.00019906023,0.00010161554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980282,0.0014191536,0.0001308528,0.00020246228,0.000118723176,0.000100569254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017187733,0.00024884834,0.00032194227,0.00090748095,0.0031389138,0.004985495,0.0007163539,0.0024165716,0.0025919331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004804162,0.0003364923,0.0003043175,0.0006817436,0.031931147,0.011693522,0.0026535806,0.004202148,0.00044562537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009554688,0.0000033247188,0.000069220674,0.000018761915,0.0000016546795,0.000049018752,0.0062374556,0.000058055808,0.000079693404,0.98910296,0.0027807842,0.001589513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047837707,0.0000064471346,0.00015689414,0.00004736227,0.0000025184142,0.000092954215,0.001717249,0.00021113943,0.00007218751,0.96162,0.03605965,0.000008823961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027229295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002066754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004985495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026889276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080773176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019509614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557269476","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12189","title":"Persons and Properties: A Sartrean Perspective on Love's Object","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Perspective (graphical); Object (grammar); Identity (music); Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Aesthetics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.047840225828495155,"score_gpt":0.27843647246479786,"score_spread":0.2305962466363027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557269476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061956525,0.008427959,0.030400475,0.025963798,0.00046868387,0.00003768239,0.000083690495,0.000056498848,0.87260467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728361,0.0023009058,0.0038556503,0.0016421172,0.00038906088,0.00004213844,0.000046379788,0.00003777892,0.018849881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970276,0.0019530206,0.000087032044,0.00031552365,0.00045261526,0.00016428062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802834,0.0011926626,0.00016065406,0.00021323453,0.0002587997,0.00014631652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037635986,0.00046040025,0.000597599,0.002013244,0.004626379,0.0071810177,0.0009686042,0.0028100715,0.0048926715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020706889,0.00033153582,0.00048334987,0.0012104962,0.026992366,0.012402613,0.004327048,0.004650797,0.00046860587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058339533,0.000008119015,0.0000604678,0.0000150926335,0.0000021056562,0.000045672357,0.0067926995,0.000037679856,0.000058899266,0.9914625,0.00046170002,0.0010492387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014353982,0.000041128318,0.00050333573,0.00013172666,0.000011221511,0.0003431828,0.008453208,0.0004887883,0.00022634109,0.90101767,0.08875573,0.0000133022195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018792707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018350362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071810177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036171027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009724387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026244104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560787606","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12192","title":"Synthetic Evidence and Objective Identity: The Contemporary Significance of Early Husserl's Conception of Truth","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence theory of truth; Epistemology; Philosophy; Phenomenology (philosophy); Pragmatic theory of truth; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Alethiology; Logical truth; Philosophical logic; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08191326235035216,"score_gpt":0.3054586561400981,"score_spread":0.22354539378974592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560787606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13826098,0.01796585,0.21360457,0.14142764,0.0017932374,0.0000863645,0.0001986017,0.00016552636,0.48649725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98654395,0.0013044559,0.0072451183,0.0010672918,0.00029775617,0.000039334096,0.00002399829,0.000028070197,0.0034500223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99299014,0.005069854,0.00018668167,0.00045293747,0.0010987404,0.00020160283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792478,0.017391955,0.0007395546,0.0010835971,0.0011625511,0.00037449488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01085758,0.00033844906,0.00053608033,0.003508323,0.0030704862,0.008947785,0.0012691403,0.0030603558,0.0031110619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01716102,0.00029006792,0.00033272256,0.0013512592,0.05606566,0.014148235,0.004419016,0.0038941053,0.00023466257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037094724,0.0000033824383,0.00003688756,0.000012305125,9.3592683e-7,0.000013639952,0.0018326063,0.00009525978,0.0000178494,0.9966779,0.00026191707,0.0010437588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005638155,0.00000829012,0.00008235477,0.00006113466,0.0000019139711,0.00002729099,0.0013115199,0.0005785252,0.00009839707,0.985372,0.01244732,0.000005633399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011586606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009943997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01085758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066467207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023437066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05742109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779697511","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12323","title":"Modesty as an excellence in moral perspective taking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Privilege (computing); Perspective (graphical); Excellence; Sociology; Social psychology; Odds; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15713229334859877,"score_gpt":0.3922224374784783,"score_spread":0.23509014412987952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779697511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14327842,0.0013167133,0.07500436,0.035541523,0.0005133584,0.00007566045,0.00007047489,0.00013916976,0.7440603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99129325,0.00018929203,0.003258949,0.0005442958,0.00010324364,0.00001872887,0.000011365094,0.000022199929,0.0045587327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923928,0.0048299856,0.00026361636,0.000657585,0.0013239279,0.0005321145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99323785,0.0025529347,0.0010534588,0.00097426504,0.0011612164,0.0010202788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008386455,0.00035809595,0.00048215338,0.0012702419,0.0030207182,0.006072115,0.0007277272,0.0019705682,0.004029147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0104142,0.00021498466,0.0004855993,0.00078056974,0.029674195,0.0072462014,0.007995968,0.0041569723,0.0005253274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012325838,0.000009469114,0.00034006112,0.000016109241,0.00000492344,0.00005780545,0.002807394,0.00019195212,0.00012488966,0.9938006,0.00055591064,0.002078507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014574791,0.00002997134,0.00058199477,0.000033790297,0.000009302272,0.00008629658,0.0011246769,0.0007965968,0.00018331662,0.98410875,0.013016437,0.0000142950685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012689596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014002055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008386455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037950738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018050693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044352293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790276528","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12331","title":"Freedom and poverty in the Kantian state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Ideal (ethics); Poverty; State (computer science); Salient; Negative liberty; Law and economics; Power (physics); Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05561043220587807,"score_gpt":0.3084853928907133,"score_spread":0.2528749606848352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790276528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13376932,0.0063872556,0.039555132,0.07761105,0.0003738666,0.000044026106,0.00011703238,0.000084917265,0.7420574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905441,0.00062863715,0.0011148179,0.0010596528,0.00008761758,0.000024077515,0.0000097492975,0.000012209947,0.0065190434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969531,0.0018366987,0.000076696066,0.00023388403,0.0005154891,0.0003841857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976835,0.0013491994,0.00022122922,0.0002432902,0.00030502072,0.00019767303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003242599,0.00024921636,0.00035518422,0.001105821,0.0045263837,0.0041575963,0.00050270674,0.0026328946,0.0034151815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039626467,0.00019851915,0.00034445908,0.0008811955,0.037961956,0.004986855,0.005239883,0.0035236094,0.00030105058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029439468,0.0000020123568,0.00002377516,0.000004058712,8.5339565e-7,0.0000062255936,0.00045299952,0.00017435291,0.00001300161,0.9985833,0.00033621024,0.00040020974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037742293,0.0000032915239,0.000046954763,0.0000132289,0.0000013147204,0.000007968804,0.00021198137,0.00024273832,0.000037322956,0.99237496,0.0070527326,0.0000036723836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032538502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021957264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055141305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055141305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024164002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04000801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892779792","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12402","title":"Subjectivism, instrumentalism, and prudentialism about reasons: On the normativity of instrumental transmission","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Subjectivism; Epistemology; Normative; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03679851788301667,"score_gpt":0.23511054665569092,"score_spread":0.19831202877267426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892779792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15894389,0.005756514,0.2801813,0.07232691,0.0008029567,0.00011427829,0.00017964463,0.0001758078,0.48151872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878808,0.0005555385,0.006849375,0.0011927745,0.00028766834,0.000074243726,0.000026659158,0.000041390966,0.003091399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873251,0.008657839,0.00046903276,0.000959478,0.0020031214,0.00058548525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97468036,0.018702302,0.0015138232,0.0021386843,0.0022197883,0.00074491714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015645213,0.00041712564,0.0008012612,0.0019849648,0.0025085444,0.006898593,0.0013737599,0.0030691293,0.0032392915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016230395,0.0004469981,0.0009713142,0.0011355669,0.049398392,0.009535168,0.0045087286,0.0056594093,0.00037467948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005086028,0.000004504038,0.000056257297,0.00000741637,0.0000029266635,0.000012166122,0.00039361313,0.00012418325,0.000026245265,0.9987165,0.0001531094,0.0004980427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040647546,0.0000030281249,0.00007053683,0.000015918558,0.0000018136851,0.000008911977,0.00015880917,0.0003387113,0.00004866974,0.9978911,0.0014552573,0.0000032376681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014190814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008034797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015645213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040587243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002228222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08274084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893543469","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12387","title":"<i>Kant's Modal Metaphysics</i>: A reply to my critics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Modal; Citation; Philosophy of language; Theology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.056446340594814695,"score_gpt":0.258715153573243,"score_spread":0.2022688129784283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893543469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008273271,0.0030799129,0.0008012594,0.9804985,0.0056105,0.000004005206,0.000020373993,0.000018047138,0.00914016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.100470275,0.0033864356,0.0015312821,0.84466344,0.03702211,0.000081816215,0.000029443416,0.00022845613,0.0125866765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840239,0.007890875,0.0009392634,0.0019929828,0.0039151353,0.0012377774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9430457,0.041105226,0.002478454,0.003069081,0.008656935,0.001644728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019639807,0.00088500214,0.0017301867,0.002682641,0.01034135,0.015754484,0.005625934,0.0438385,0.0057389084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05909574,0.0010121409,0.0015204058,0.0032956097,0.051917054,0.019536534,0.008011668,0.071006104,0.003319994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043261512,0.000015415926,0.00017114161,0.00012282569,0.000035219156,0.00009544533,0.005745319,0.00012019619,0.000083799634,0.6176689,0.37204543,0.003853052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048334954,0.000013786789,0.00054163486,0.00075641513,0.00005105807,0.00020307531,0.0074196127,0.00061057217,0.0003852917,0.62296605,0.36691537,0.00008871001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009068371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0084188385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0438385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0082155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005732483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10386646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908572182","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12428","title":"Freedom immediately after Kant","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Action (physics); Philosophy; Transcendental number; Moral philosophy; Practical reason; Key (lock); Natural (archaeology); Natural law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.026664205756671226,"score_gpt":0.20767946402723214,"score_spread":0.18101525827056092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908572182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027873509,0.005624583,0.03230192,0.03460024,0.001148509,0.000035554425,0.00019076202,0.00012622701,0.89809865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.913794,0.0010197199,0.0030019963,0.004608382,0.00043464708,0.000045278022,0.00010036578,0.00008929306,0.07690626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670213,0.0014883716,0.000079088786,0.00050412386,0.00075696985,0.00046930983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819285,0.00086010736,0.00009104558,0.00036974842,0.00033476026,0.00015154341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025345243,0.0003775281,0.00035047365,0.0011183455,0.0037632787,0.004492629,0.00054021337,0.002506852,0.007005915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047181295,0.00019020919,0.00053755654,0.0006438043,0.023786094,0.003997904,0.0030879783,0.004944088,0.0012158847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039627885,0.0000022384652,0.000025470323,0.0000043666146,9.5272503e-7,0.000010792098,0.00037708346,0.000083671264,0.000024474935,0.99701166,0.0012131118,0.0012422152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030248434,0.0000047397916,0.000055563356,0.000026072736,0.0000015964299,0.000024499048,0.00013722532,0.00010998848,0.00009386091,0.96014595,0.039392583,0.000004968633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048911697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002580881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007005915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00572303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028373566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041523695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941903897","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12452","title":"Phenomenological reduction in Merleau‐Ponty's <i>The Structure of Behavior</i>: An alternative approach to the naturalization of phenomenology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Naturalization; Transcendental number; Psychology; Interpretative phenomenological analysis; Philosophy; Sociology; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.0373844363406729,"score_gpt":0.28428627270247514,"score_spread":0.24690183636180224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941903897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06658382,0.0029486925,0.33544058,0.0716844,0.0015417662,0.0002933927,0.0001582267,0.0003012022,0.5210479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94810605,0.0007583838,0.034355145,0.0022496597,0.00032929386,0.00034437422,0.00004920125,0.00014005763,0.013667804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935719,0.004236624,0.00017868454,0.00062480284,0.0010541015,0.00033387024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99500847,0.0028348418,0.0003868891,0.0007843468,0.0006929482,0.00029242717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007747655,0.0005195314,0.0006668901,0.0020832275,0.004806747,0.007572405,0.0020547933,0.002989409,0.003707531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008965499,0.0006002586,0.0010584827,0.0012681452,0.0575055,0.0122961635,0.0070610303,0.007647687,0.00045281113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004146103,0.0000042631996,0.000017077291,0.000009746973,0.0000010716543,0.000013814427,0.0031968239,0.00007182215,0.000036923942,0.99588805,0.0002850355,0.00047133752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009498818,0.0000075201483,0.00006847059,0.000030898453,0.0000021693725,0.00003280186,0.0011706494,0.0008377559,0.00008599946,0.98484707,0.012899022,0.0000081780745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041585634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023066236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008149667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008149667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042760884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05913025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969367414","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12470","title":"A mereological argument for the non‐spatiotemporality of things in themselves","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Mereology; Metaphysics; Transcendental idealism; Transcendental number; Idealism","score_opus":0.05849393349855538,"score_gpt":0.2516204625390472,"score_spread":0.1931265290404918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969367414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19341442,0.0049644755,0.23913345,0.041779432,0.0019890075,0.00005070155,0.000244655,0.00017511305,0.51824874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791173,0.0006287435,0.0105721,0.0008968306,0.00047656687,0.00005252419,0.00006827788,0.000052490443,0.008135106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970192,0.0013745361,0.00019193867,0.00044407437,0.00078529463,0.00018500327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464005,0.0024056998,0.0006599587,0.0010386767,0.00095253275,0.0003031379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036921864,0.00022896161,0.0003954008,0.0011937858,0.0024553733,0.0037296913,0.0011131209,0.0020342623,0.003532157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054088393,0.0003655571,0.00068997673,0.00084367034,0.02210332,0.0070904666,0.0040867263,0.003546923,0.00043886478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003981199,0.0000026302973,0.000028388933,0.000009446157,0.0000015327355,0.00001766578,0.0002455809,0.000055516928,0.00008247059,0.99913055,0.0001988754,0.00022341554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008112357,0.000008607456,0.00013769172,0.000021660306,0.000006360385,0.0000726542,0.00031128508,0.00050315924,0.00022736477,0.98428637,0.014410475,0.0000064123496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006208225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052832125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037296913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020190447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011272834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019526362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003522419","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12518","title":"Discovering the virtue of hope","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"University of Leeds; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Phenomenon; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Environmental ethics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030702734245187224,"score_gpt":0.26187906128823035,"score_spread":0.23117632704304314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003522419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4349754,0.009807276,0.043442,0.097919494,0.0011998558,0.000055823446,0.00010446961,0.000105137966,0.4123906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579155,0.00061303866,0.0011849632,0.00081554335,0.00007659721,0.000007268234,0.000008032307,0.0000077801915,0.0014952293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989033,0.0006890624,0.00002403076,0.00009978823,0.0001671808,0.00011664057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597794,0.0023152994,0.00054592517,0.00032129098,0.0003720148,0.00046757373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038634625,0.00015473519,0.00034951972,0.00073759974,0.0013657958,0.0036995206,0.00039122603,0.0009536334,0.0025716727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050391965,0.00012403267,0.00019491772,0.0003560628,0.021591553,0.004839183,0.003136228,0.0029592193,0.00023648843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040167928,0.000024617773,0.001504312,0.000075718024,0.0000073896726,0.000070993876,0.007010662,0.00011302436,0.00032530143,0.9790582,0.0019161268,0.009853424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013407311,0.000051886036,0.0019460114,0.00009849404,0.0000083310715,0.00013063956,0.0059234984,0.00053393224,0.0003212328,0.9687121,0.022244303,0.000016214757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041580677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006072174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038634625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013164857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009965735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020432234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010843317","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12499","title":"Frege on the generality of logical laws","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Normative; Epistemology; Philosophy of logic; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.12467164183243024,"score_gpt":0.2947887513210711,"score_spread":0.17011710948864084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010843317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071968414,0.02125928,0.120773226,0.064227365,0.00076053507,0.00008158272,0.00037475297,0.00039193858,0.7201629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97300386,0.0031602334,0.0090335775,0.003514813,0.0008318927,0.00009321445,0.0000899159,0.000088282955,0.0101841735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573094,0.002235526,0.00020815922,0.00068534684,0.0007239444,0.0004159809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929355,0.004965965,0.00031809523,0.0008519902,0.0006939782,0.00023453662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053449566,0.0005657508,0.000925918,0.004157505,0.0035700866,0.00674622,0.00079941185,0.0026019276,0.0037701176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010557461,0.0007214349,0.0012099554,0.001545328,0.029644137,0.010254175,0.0038753042,0.0047623883,0.0005979534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003899,0.0000026860353,0.0000495526,0.0000080716845,0.000004276199,0.000016274367,0.00023400997,0.00020124037,0.0000266004,0.9980848,0.00060423923,0.0007642741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033699735,0.000002141822,0.000047370646,0.000011079981,0.0000031929796,0.00001172981,0.000035744488,0.00021266929,0.000021072621,0.9962955,0.003352943,0.0000030638985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057668537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022629984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00674622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059517324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016245014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04318303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011924815","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12536","title":"On the putative possibility of non‐spatio‐temporal forms of sensibility in Kant","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensibility; Philosophy; Criticism; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Argument (complex analysis); Intellect; Value (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Mathematics; Literature","score_opus":0.07501238814444404,"score_gpt":0.2595617121317797,"score_spread":0.18454932398733565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011924815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16294318,0.0070285895,0.090060316,0.044112027,0.00088890205,0.00004925741,0.00013864062,0.00026265724,0.6945165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893093,0.00060853997,0.0031014413,0.0011217833,0.00013118696,0.000039074923,0.000019667434,0.000042794312,0.005626151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930019,0.004613969,0.00022582417,0.000656125,0.00096929783,0.0005329009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127847,0.00622956,0.0005540664,0.00095928425,0.00068327296,0.00029525318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074208383,0.00038783424,0.0006218019,0.0017966707,0.0035742042,0.009364919,0.0013029334,0.004421381,0.0040020435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009626131,0.00059147243,0.00086612254,0.0011093741,0.050244607,0.012725391,0.00657765,0.0049202084,0.0007244104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001048843,0.0000030710232,0.000048572667,0.000014397721,0.0000022076736,0.00003558027,0.0017369685,0.00019406863,0.000060755745,0.9969908,0.00032663697,0.0005764232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049747528,0.0000041175736,0.000065291795,0.000030054463,0.000002484196,0.000031173622,0.0006581081,0.0003333632,0.00009175754,0.99445564,0.004312854,0.000010077963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001287533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008571367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009364919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046184654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015708789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039245605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022921090","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12542","title":"Why you cannot make people better by telling them what is good","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ceteris paribus; Pessimism; Optimism; Trustworthiness; Core (optical fiber); Social psychology; Psychology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12062070411926878,"score_gpt":0.38226779381840226,"score_spread":0.2616470896991335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022921090","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04129276,0.0085959295,0.026265612,0.7976406,0.0035438058,0.000057557892,0.00007558378,0.000130296,0.122397795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91531783,0.003056868,0.008175783,0.061752375,0.0007525045,0.00004860585,0.0000261696,0.000055666856,0.010814215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98251086,0.012186164,0.0006664425,0.0010144528,0.0027853444,0.00083674595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97171843,0.017164905,0.0031489423,0.001925266,0.00415549,0.001886974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020321196,0.0003897376,0.0005258171,0.0008201165,0.0034046327,0.0053650867,0.0012120988,0.00621511,0.006477514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042068884,0.0002953246,0.0003736998,0.00040145902,0.030244062,0.0076896884,0.0035050174,0.0075182407,0.0021860453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014755846,0.000111143585,0.0024617189,0.00038392967,0.00009712013,0.0004270324,0.021125484,0.0007926324,0.0012600208,0.8782496,0.06895942,0.025984246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003460081,0.00005456741,0.00077471096,0.00047142938,0.000035727695,0.0004145436,0.0065931273,0.0013172819,0.000824466,0.92388767,0.0655371,0.00005485882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015247863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009946655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020321196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020683352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023328587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107470036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3069891404","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12578","title":"Astell, friendship, and relational autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Interpretation (philosophy); Autonomy; Virtue; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.08392156477992745,"score_gpt":0.2136987591342853,"score_spread":0.12977719435435786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3069891404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31941152,0.005457879,0.013371614,0.02169806,0.00019863834,0.000030204861,0.00006670877,0.00008069038,0.6396847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99198884,0.00034145414,0.00034707334,0.00023895176,0.000047344653,0.000006660478,0.000008469782,0.0000045854613,0.007016582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847406,0.0007898236,0.000037559363,0.0001977001,0.000326832,0.00017395751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775356,0.0008614536,0.00039607368,0.00023936,0.00030504793,0.00044448217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012086182,0.0001723374,0.00018523053,0.0009804617,0.0036809002,0.003288416,0.00051565067,0.0008543159,0.004969297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002674771,0.00007916506,0.000155519,0.0006964258,0.013360465,0.004614736,0.0042562215,0.0012140694,0.00036205765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013666325,0.000012701575,0.0010686449,0.00002199448,0.000003836778,0.00010099742,0.017226828,0.00009628293,0.00011688708,0.9733507,0.0019382406,0.006049339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017733875,0.000046755747,0.004445122,0.000113423375,0.000015798774,0.0004168544,0.023937825,0.00095138286,0.00031461517,0.84366566,0.126053,0.000021831645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005032612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00442969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005032612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023747277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009335277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017229915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084066437","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12570","title":"Kant and the concept of an object","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Object (grammar); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05493437188890296,"score_gpt":0.23077315576311294,"score_spread":0.17583878387420998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084066437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024929898,0.02129917,0.049528245,0.0392873,0.0013898778,0.000055574248,0.00012368927,0.000102447004,0.8632838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9328336,0.0052217143,0.013946713,0.004673883,0.00096697814,0.00012790694,0.000078064266,0.000107515814,0.042043693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912407,0.0056984187,0.00031496328,0.0005843471,0.0016389218,0.0005227509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589753,0.0022276219,0.00037390002,0.00049630494,0.00069303537,0.0003115997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065626297,0.0006686357,0.00060593075,0.0022294396,0.00494749,0.007899952,0.0010381048,0.0037105246,0.0031943484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049920827,0.00048867834,0.00064323394,0.0017090663,0.049397293,0.011863362,0.0050234706,0.0053866906,0.0008040188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026939608,0.0000019280358,0.000016608166,0.00001094153,0.0000012165095,0.000008179626,0.0004182817,0.00004884974,0.000012155661,0.9984841,0.0004812293,0.000513753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034878221,0.0000038644907,0.000040784886,0.000041294225,0.0000022153165,0.000025481011,0.00019034893,0.000117740674,0.000034042583,0.9802335,0.01930205,0.000005145512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022928647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001379138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007967097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007967097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030962639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057805598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106919281","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12621","title":"Bergson on Kant and the freedom of the <i>moi en général</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02173252195253802,"score_gpt":0.18261435035901524,"score_spread":0.16088182840647722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106919281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037593998,0.029733552,0.008836755,0.08799888,0.0015727676,0.000018566136,0.00011556039,0.000054294564,0.83407557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94857454,0.0048469324,0.0011874924,0.0068018115,0.00071554637,0.00003342306,0.0000324517,0.000045961664,0.03776196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967565,0.0020370435,0.000062789375,0.00024171417,0.00048920175,0.00041279977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980562,0.0013474122,0.00015365567,0.00011285021,0.00021900088,0.000110900764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031569025,0.000408898,0.00047165857,0.0012820892,0.0038596073,0.0061623417,0.0005232839,0.0025693744,0.005617729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034091303,0.00024176169,0.00037671777,0.0010237303,0.024505395,0.004269092,0.002669123,0.0034688076,0.0005761917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072318744,0.0000019579495,0.00002143073,0.000008877229,0.0000015113693,0.000013793478,0.00073235686,0.0000953869,0.000019365334,0.9965024,0.0019334536,0.0006622969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009366422,0.000007105336,0.00020578067,0.00012137077,0.000005318997,0.000034859273,0.0012397973,0.00019619013,0.00009168407,0.8998763,0.09819649,0.000015698824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009711278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079817735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009711278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008956982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023190635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06498778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126173817","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12630","title":"Perfectionism and dignity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectionism (psychology); Dignity; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06722999545208067,"score_gpt":0.3119351195248794,"score_spread":0.24470512407279874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126173817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31763,0.007503809,0.028585538,0.04718583,0.00045959806,0.000100201374,0.0001069177,0.00006812104,0.59836006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950504,0.0006806707,0.0009909237,0.0005829408,0.000045451263,0.000013072648,0.0000143251345,0.000004070285,0.0026181552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975446,0.0011883241,0.00012502931,0.0002382403,0.0006631085,0.0002407093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99486876,0.0020071932,0.0009729135,0.00059348985,0.00069172384,0.0008659273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039251177,0.00024956782,0.00029004083,0.000926049,0.0018134337,0.004475551,0.00064061396,0.0012606069,0.002636611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008504292,0.00013846834,0.00021326604,0.00060176995,0.032160547,0.0036375832,0.004961781,0.0024304641,0.00017453419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011637841,0.00002250139,0.001580359,0.000048252834,0.000010936818,0.0001421146,0.005226265,0.00037397674,0.00021345286,0.9834235,0.00085464807,0.008092452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000854915,0.000037468282,0.0022037448,0.00014876979,0.0000066401067,0.00022502271,0.0024033082,0.00042129296,0.00016846607,0.9772972,0.017064426,0.000015171478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015522875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095114857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004475551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024677422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023288082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020758212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141166926","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12654","title":"Hermann Cohen on the role of history in critical philosophy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Teleology; Critical philosophy; Context (archaeology); History and philosophy of science; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of computer science; Philosophy of history; Transcendental number; Philosophy; Sociology; Western philosophy; History","score_opus":0.09585797677770702,"score_gpt":0.26604326944863294,"score_spread":0.17018529267092591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141166926","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035661794,0.086718895,0.0351321,0.41870672,0.005318232,0.0001073238,0.00011474919,0.00015020774,0.41809005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924653,0.018926002,0.008144083,0.021996262,0.0031230005,0.00017406541,0.000024505278,0.00015826723,0.022800798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953407,0.0033660636,0.00011606342,0.00035834257,0.0005649824,0.00025377263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97849613,0.018694961,0.00058338046,0.0005211918,0.0012197472,0.00048458585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00845897,0.00047070233,0.0005793941,0.0026212863,0.0054690256,0.0063141696,0.000960767,0.0034031156,0.0030143573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013349256,0.00033882438,0.00038244427,0.001647765,0.032757938,0.010857033,0.00333682,0.005141679,0.00041783645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008943224,0.000004982512,0.000058745336,0.000035722267,0.0000024498215,0.000038718837,0.0019938692,0.00013519965,0.000025568903,0.9913434,0.0044903597,0.0018620606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010201305,0.0000060217385,0.00005655765,0.00013821815,0.0000036399167,0.00003125591,0.00077757385,0.00031101872,0.000097510405,0.94872195,0.04983641,0.000009670872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056735463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029498152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009204515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009204515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040763062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066783786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191321340","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00453.x","title":"Reasonable Trust","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Action (physics); Perspective (graphical); Norm (philosophy); Individualism; Epistemology; Rational agent; Social psychology; Disposition; Law and economics; Psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.20513799963846407,"score_gpt":0.25879431059893565,"score_spread":0.053656310960471576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191321340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03592243,0.0017063691,0.097862996,0.050098337,0.00073584425,0.0002152354,0.00045855134,0.0002580397,0.8127422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94957876,0.00094632414,0.008044054,0.0030177762,0.00028651583,0.00011129324,0.00027708744,0.000070333546,0.03766797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938127,0.0026833871,0.00046743368,0.000819508,0.0015703161,0.0006466328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801098,0.005784498,0.003211491,0.0047147037,0.004336508,0.0018429313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058406834,0.0004041608,0.0004521443,0.0011308533,0.0023988625,0.0052166376,0.0009173724,0.0028626048,0.028268538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035850767,0.00028116824,0.0005104192,0.0008607838,0.0047826786,0.0054129395,0.0033735184,0.0025395525,0.0051023304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035153815,0.000025798134,0.0021326873,0.00011386178,0.000031825835,0.0002932533,0.0011853236,0.00078007375,0.00022300346,0.95622915,0.014970932,0.02397894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031151656,0.0000588765,0.0016156889,0.00017592739,0.0000368868,0.0007501362,0.0008561401,0.0029680687,0.0004548207,0.8500393,0.14298193,0.000030925003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003629259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031028695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028268538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038177548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035496794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094567716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198288919","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12712","title":"Perception and self‐awareness in <scp>Merleau‐Ponty</scp> and Martin","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Arts Foundation; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Cognition; Social psychology; Space (punctuation); Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.030883366922830908,"score_gpt":0.27548553401227344,"score_spread":0.24460216708944252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198288919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49551615,0.028877154,0.030778395,0.17811634,0.001898455,0.00007008211,0.000107879256,0.0002660928,0.2643694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905005,0.0014764838,0.00079007423,0.0029409153,0.00019580343,0.000013711132,0.000008313986,0.000020818205,0.0040532933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993944,0.00024408981,0.000026023135,0.00009285949,0.00019510822,0.000047514546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795926,0.0012745522,0.00027011405,0.00014424682,0.00025501134,0.00009676204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011838231,0.00024990927,0.00024911945,0.0006673781,0.0012847492,0.002666588,0.00066070777,0.0026927448,0.0015617886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075201984,0.0002862353,0.00017486434,0.00040878754,0.008875066,0.0056075687,0.002295518,0.003489176,0.00018496101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012336954,0.000052322906,0.0019855986,0.00021130983,0.000027147122,0.0027137673,0.13283476,0.00041637814,0.0022641176,0.8066289,0.023690926,0.029051509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032615095,0.00007727377,0.007395731,0.0003158554,0.000022423124,0.004883697,0.018939096,0.0017219639,0.0020700775,0.7843754,0.1800551,0.00011078693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032546578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016103712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032546578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013282108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006263467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009636939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206376754","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12690","title":"Introspective acquaintance: An integration account","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Austrian Science Fund; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Syracuse University","keywords":"Introspection; Extant taxon; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Neglect; Relation (database); Cognitive science; Empirical research; Consciousness; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030952917568924303,"score_gpt":0.30546648430090456,"score_spread":0.27451356673198024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206376754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22780484,0.0023193613,0.2663183,0.011813027,0.00020470799,0.0001247487,0.00014888734,0.000815537,0.49045053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98728925,0.00029590624,0.007035038,0.00072320906,0.00014908871,0.00003928221,0.000078953824,0.000072209434,0.0043169716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638015,0.0011681708,0.0001079352,0.00071923767,0.0012974695,0.0003269884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99246126,0.002736117,0.0009405084,0.0023275798,0.0011395634,0.00039499387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036179519,0.0004321581,0.0005953114,0.0016916115,0.0012725216,0.0045464677,0.0018341603,0.0021736978,0.0063500204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006901661,0.0004780281,0.00091087713,0.0010865047,0.0077607045,0.0129413055,0.0069444925,0.003559193,0.0005661891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038440518,0.00006233712,0.0020944912,0.00005703223,0.00003611008,0.00027588205,0.0060948953,0.0008222402,0.0008650841,0.9698533,0.0009468441,0.018853417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030728734,0.000057684992,0.0047423965,0.00009446756,0.00005039365,0.00047456654,0.00094157126,0.009584884,0.0005999077,0.9706762,0.012714796,0.000032323744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001912713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009344528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063500204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015692508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010832811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021242917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205096217","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12756","title":"<scp>Self‐deception</scp>and moral interests","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"False accusation; Deception; Prima facie; Argument (complex analysis); Self-deception; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Reductio ad absurdum; Psychology; Social psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.06904985213337132,"score_gpt":0.30497881238606156,"score_spread":0.23592896025269022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205096217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2621274,0.001597932,0.03343236,0.051988047,0.00025613338,0.000048823997,0.00008613005,0.000068688714,0.65039444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99512154,0.00014748344,0.00092631445,0.000701487,0.000051445204,0.000010912392,0.000008067145,0.000009622936,0.0030229508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954312,0.0030998935,0.00020011401,0.00030211845,0.00065168965,0.00031504067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844721,0.01028501,0.0019695202,0.0012402108,0.0016193279,0.0004139054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006149864,0.0001615498,0.0002606793,0.0007400686,0.0024385704,0.0061875833,0.000825418,0.0045648003,0.004555147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013237184,0.00024666332,0.00021093314,0.0007380567,0.025441715,0.006501913,0.0038399876,0.004838937,0.00047372037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012112249,0.0000109574175,0.00045861778,0.000030567677,0.000003430904,0.0001646651,0.011323373,0.0001021241,0.0001680732,0.98360276,0.0010938729,0.0030294997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015614873,0.000029992378,0.0029952547,0.00020967098,0.000012283799,0.00049269374,0.01302458,0.0017901063,0.0009418123,0.9474067,0.033046607,0.0000347013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031045603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026818875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061875833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026571027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013322205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03252393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207063734","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12763","title":"Imputability, answerability, and the epistemic condition on moral and legal culpability","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Ignorance; Culpability; Morality; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03230808794465524,"score_gpt":0.24264939604514754,"score_spread":0.21034130810049229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207063734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.284759,0.0015405373,0.16996188,0.022648538,0.00037891665,0.00010219356,0.00020041356,0.00025265015,0.5201559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925988,0.0001619581,0.0037059817,0.00037927052,0.00010635387,0.000036667876,0.000039304992,0.000019780422,0.0029518765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943494,0.0026958897,0.0003786026,0.00081226684,0.0010114644,0.0007524142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98096246,0.012797888,0.0012465388,0.0022617455,0.0018477353,0.0008836115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006477996,0.0004178874,0.0006899471,0.0019238117,0.0018990365,0.004949061,0.0013162312,0.0043896222,0.008860854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021098478,0.00047054602,0.0010687817,0.0006814298,0.023834473,0.010179531,0.0057408055,0.004037928,0.00066647615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103565935,0.000008341755,0.00018154879,0.000016002927,0.0000041830017,0.00008575627,0.00041860167,0.00020678686,0.00011927251,0.9978765,0.00017905096,0.00089358166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012117664,0.000009768373,0.0002548184,0.0000231995,0.00000463408,0.000078940786,0.00018795117,0.0009220211,0.00013441632,0.99686855,0.0014949305,0.000008632085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011305506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062390574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008860854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023359936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001222397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03425932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221007854","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12761","title":"Kant's Schematism of the categories: An interpretation and defence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Intuition; Object (grammar); Interpretation (philosophy); Schema (genetic algorithms); Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03475153966960281,"score_gpt":0.22425925588408235,"score_spread":0.18950771621447954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221007854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04910363,0.012851613,0.15312517,0.085896,0.0019139763,0.000085947555,0.00041260727,0.00027907384,0.69633204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458447,0.0027946103,0.017740957,0.006966875,0.0009595769,0.00017779005,0.00014514413,0.00016816039,0.025202155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99434185,0.0033013944,0.00015133109,0.00044913052,0.0014161973,0.0003400108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969593,0.0016472377,0.00023092378,0.0005673515,0.0004556685,0.00013956327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050963424,0.00059609953,0.000701767,0.0030103393,0.0029064945,0.0073350933,0.0016289551,0.004997187,0.0043222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055325064,0.0005296584,0.0010950764,0.0025089525,0.03475072,0.0074852803,0.005036226,0.0069578923,0.00079332606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023143648,9.564708e-7,0.000008506415,0.0000056257013,0.0000010277907,0.000005810472,0.0002668433,0.00007861198,0.00001616278,0.9988586,0.00041772053,0.0003378975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000470198,0.0000027239926,0.000025538799,0.000022957303,0.0000016515816,0.000014708865,0.00018935117,0.0002877033,0.000042848966,0.9877823,0.011621909,0.0000035638595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002074535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013100342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073350933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00623798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018681074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045259953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307280496","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12829","title":"Moral friends? The idea of the moral relationship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Morality; Virtue; Normative; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Criticism; Appeal; Social psychology; Moral psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral disengagement; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10292313285930213,"score_gpt":0.2391083625052267,"score_spread":0.13618522964592458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307280496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11192669,0.00510826,0.058430184,0.075222865,0.00087978557,0.00005614056,0.000047974485,0.0000958955,0.7482323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990633,0.00052276865,0.0017228553,0.0012087625,0.00019886531,0.000021222577,0.0000085418205,0.000018563147,0.0056654373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99089605,0.0073196907,0.000115678544,0.00065241026,0.00066179567,0.00035436766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930102,0.003172353,0.000981759,0.0008259327,0.0008180989,0.0011916058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059152874,0.00028090162,0.00037235112,0.0013670549,0.0053081503,0.008494367,0.0012345022,0.003841954,0.0072381073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008212727,0.00028184187,0.00034766863,0.0008493836,0.04214853,0.013658532,0.005449895,0.004171522,0.00082022086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004464053,0.0000067586902,0.00010628711,0.000008244986,0.0000022886748,0.000026386473,0.0022402047,0.00005408363,0.000020039819,0.9960452,0.00049903686,0.000987128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012148692,0.000019851486,0.00029648826,0.0000478359,0.000009524302,0.00013076168,0.0045543285,0.0008280644,0.000057129306,0.96420115,0.029831849,0.000010773681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014278248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008663764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008494367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031567346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013313073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03128338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365457516","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12855","title":"R. MatthewShockey, The bounds of self: An essay on Heidegger's Being and Time. New York, NY: Routledge. 2021. p. 224. £130 (hbk.)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Citation; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Art history; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.043118232389348456,"score_gpt":0.27880300765158644,"score_spread":0.235684775262238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365457516","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051782577,0.8898834,0.0014811344,0.037919834,0.0024571156,0.000021499201,0.00013588238,0.00006620004,0.06751703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031828076,0.6672028,0.002970743,0.012661493,0.0040201573,0.00014764852,0.0002200097,0.00022182874,0.28072733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994085,0.00020024234,0.00002743379,0.00007969634,0.00022527878,0.000058908154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990565,0.00066045247,0.00006498975,0.000033497814,0.000119996104,0.00006440472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010326157,0.001012127,0.00066869694,0.001855308,0.0022323243,0.0031275009,0.0010989278,0.0032673655,0.023455378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022505298,0.0008981233,0.00038815802,0.0025068698,0.0047415104,0.008852944,0.0017438376,0.003504459,0.007297484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002917365,0.000022374697,0.00010716211,0.00047687895,0.0000069857947,0.00012378745,0.005157169,0.00008044631,0.00014744196,0.09870647,0.8220905,0.073051654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005898404,0.000008195374,0.0006145494,0.000803557,0.000004009884,0.00017330036,0.0015818436,0.000033537483,0.00007307377,0.03413202,0.96255875,0.000011232471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022011824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034416895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023455378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026014082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029674638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07846606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379232482","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12875","title":"Transformative grief","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transformative learning; Grief; Identity (music); Revelation; Psychology; Structuring; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Law","score_opus":0.0637594121649091,"score_gpt":0.33376722707677436,"score_spread":0.27000781491186526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379232482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09495668,0.006745935,0.028352031,0.061778,0.0018792619,0.00014056316,0.0000777615,0.0001939681,0.80587584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730409,0.0016296196,0.0020144274,0.003680007,0.00016149567,0.000039593808,0.000023512848,0.000029738336,0.019380739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559045,0.0027342252,0.000076916825,0.00027434368,0.0007390048,0.00058510405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99694365,0.0012941203,0.0004154153,0.00037427834,0.00041417615,0.00055834965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045223935,0.00046240035,0.00032385244,0.00085410266,0.0046190294,0.0049901833,0.000801598,0.0019333023,0.00591922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072179534,0.0001309139,0.0003919101,0.00046988195,0.035386015,0.0051093157,0.007189188,0.0058695776,0.00083779177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029226523,0.00005953023,0.00049398467,0.00006191009,0.0000061400156,0.00049329404,0.0452105,0.00016965687,0.0002484169,0.9325485,0.0071649253,0.013513937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026576638,0.0000805673,0.0011413891,0.00046187962,0.000007645346,0.0020426738,0.047856383,0.0005670637,0.00089360354,0.6547303,0.2921616,0.000030247878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012359027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011791415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00591922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00329392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024971683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02391702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380052543","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12860","title":"Is (self‐)reflection a form of intentionality? Sartre's dilemma","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Consciousness; Dilemma; Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09403184443994152,"score_gpt":0.35251957011891033,"score_spread":0.2584877256789688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380052543","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05336883,0.003620469,0.029527804,0.46748766,0.0021171083,0.0000669054,0.00006199988,0.0001641719,0.44358507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587705,0.0010895008,0.0053740046,0.01761382,0.0009209081,0.00012374145,0.000022335586,0.00009800262,0.015987318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842503,0.009998238,0.0007461345,0.0016957852,0.0023946834,0.00091479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97749025,0.01682605,0.001208377,0.0018461904,0.0018174448,0.0008117372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014468419,0.0005875825,0.000982899,0.001444621,0.0038340366,0.0090624085,0.002370104,0.014697203,0.0047724494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03346713,0.00048225958,0.0010036721,0.00081045256,0.042197067,0.018363405,0.0072955918,0.010433181,0.0009070392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009145534,0.000010268832,0.000035919387,0.000021915177,0.000003733385,0.00014486506,0.0041963435,0.00010605328,0.000061470426,0.9901625,0.0036742832,0.0015735492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017195585,0.000018156652,0.00006245974,0.00010673781,0.0000041682747,0.0002896638,0.0030014487,0.000930812,0.00017332974,0.96297354,0.03239916,0.000023349246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012981131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006460281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014697203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057914513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002643709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076517224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387543248","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12900","title":"Sex, truth, and law: Rereading Foucault's <i>History of Sexuality</i> after volume 4, <i>The Confessions of the Flesh</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Virginity test; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; History; Gender studies; Art","score_opus":0.048976051095956964,"score_gpt":0.2911096724791419,"score_spread":0.24213362138318492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387543248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021752035,0.21610002,0.010443026,0.31501716,0.03352356,0.000052399286,0.000084866646,0.00021106473,0.4028159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73626643,0.05653223,0.007053763,0.050559755,0.024626255,0.00016526463,0.0000850398,0.0005674196,0.12414382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955024,0.0030755498,0.000080675294,0.0001863319,0.00080675335,0.00034830248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490875,0.0040294873,0.00021519866,0.00022811657,0.00041292357,0.00020556893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057640686,0.0007518797,0.00070104713,0.0038911097,0.009672623,0.013737772,0.0015729698,0.004640641,0.0025647774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009797911,0.00040437025,0.0005746205,0.0016295423,0.0520361,0.01202345,0.0040634884,0.00887019,0.00058396073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016990332,0.000010179525,0.00011900486,0.00008327598,0.0000037669417,0.00019477516,0.04999288,0.000116792165,0.00008904887,0.89204866,0.04079441,0.016530113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006972046,0.000026915119,0.00029606366,0.0007245019,0.000005418666,0.00016607206,0.02022017,0.000212771,0.00016787814,0.4992408,0.47891107,0.000021360334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022937715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025564697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022937715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012161345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009209818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08823717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390408580","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12926","title":"Joint action and spontaneity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Joint (building); Action (physics); Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Engineering; Architectural engineering","score_opus":0.14509055822425854,"score_gpt":0.2779063298130162,"score_spread":0.13281577158875768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390408580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14749002,0.004705734,0.23317705,0.023403484,0.0006935116,0.00007422493,0.00009945455,0.00025958987,0.5900969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841809,0.00046952994,0.008817206,0.00045658814,0.000106482315,0.000041582953,0.000028927188,0.00004067535,0.005858016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960173,0.0020695021,0.00017080412,0.0006863705,0.0007620152,0.00029396155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406934,0.0031361647,0.0007482062,0.0010495383,0.0005097646,0.000486963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004034861,0.00026419578,0.0004858926,0.0007751538,0.0016676061,0.0039733434,0.00081514305,0.0017601497,0.006259204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008123379,0.00026278946,0.000621399,0.0004996603,0.013341696,0.0065105427,0.0050928285,0.0020937726,0.00052002084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001027593,0.000006672635,0.0002081237,0.00002897601,0.000008045833,0.00004800143,0.0013739232,0.00035196336,0.00028128325,0.9931496,0.0004878937,0.004045408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007615559,0.000013421349,0.00027895544,0.00002069107,0.000004184686,0.00008958645,0.0004278422,0.00093883235,0.00014366888,0.98996115,0.008106949,0.0000071172376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005604207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035966118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006259204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012028224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011631913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021338642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401820805","doi":"10.1111/ejop.13004","title":"Introspection: First‐person access in science and agency: By MajaSpener Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024. ISBN: 9780198867449","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Introspection; Agency (philosophy); Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.02123062507732415,"score_gpt":0.2688577951135518,"score_spread":0.24762717003622764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401820805","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006951598,0.881745,0.0028185404,0.019090503,0.0029630603,0.000019541843,0.00013897773,0.0001405288,0.09238869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038912416,0.6580274,0.004704746,0.0062556365,0.0036007129,0.00012464308,0.0003959087,0.00030242477,0.28767607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862766,0.00045701902,0.00011581939,0.00022830137,0.00046682605,0.00010436951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981173,0.0010892409,0.00017822403,0.00019706578,0.0002647042,0.00015343107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022666533,0.0018233202,0.0010574405,0.0023813024,0.0014042846,0.007843752,0.001297717,0.003473819,0.028472824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002681437,0.0011859608,0.0006507505,0.0035727085,0.006816729,0.013449268,0.0031808957,0.004469733,0.014201797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006437426,0.000065289176,0.00036473284,0.0015665124,0.000037730377,0.00022870634,0.005605888,0.00038124886,0.00035697696,0.15441611,0.51222134,0.32469115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063215202,0.000014476785,0.00084843044,0.0014176869,0.000007751599,0.00039728897,0.00096680125,0.000076636985,0.00007164919,0.04111399,0.95506173,0.00001714792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045642937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047341846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028472824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029024428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003922039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095251024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402402283","doi":"10.1111/ejop.13003","title":"Replies to Nicholas Walker, Taylor Carman, and Peter Gordon","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.035553461869898974,"score_gpt":0.2972584323863955,"score_spread":0.2617049705164965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402402283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009854194,0.0038062546,0.00032733593,0.9733087,0.009692024,0.0000115076355,0.000025545225,0.000021907492,0.011821234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0780785,0.010004247,0.0012671227,0.8019557,0.012147157,0.00016219719,0.00006588935,0.00026699825,0.09605221],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996949,0.001496394,0.00012336178,0.00036298434,0.0008597765,0.00020859044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914874,0.0051796655,0.00039751994,0.00019538656,0.0021186634,0.00062144606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004005415,0.00056490186,0.0008663759,0.0009482386,0.0066863806,0.0039272173,0.0016973126,0.012849496,0.0107702715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023936408,0.00052095106,0.0004710742,0.0011469087,0.0077041355,0.005544201,0.002357494,0.02147187,0.0037028014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001842252,0.000008414582,0.00012420795,0.000053214477,0.0000042099628,0.0003031186,0.0039718295,0.000056853853,0.00009038561,0.059341025,0.93253535,0.003492836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005648988,0.000009327313,0.00017775739,0.00027224165,0.0000052341347,0.00032535175,0.006786267,0.00008598016,0.00015640813,0.010804639,0.9813355,0.00003573711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015991902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012904658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015991902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074565797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032962942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054101586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406464802","doi":"10.1111/ejop.13038","title":"Metaphor and Metaphilosophy: Wittgenstein, <scp>MacDonald</scp>, and Conceptual Metaphor Theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Metaphilosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Western philosophy","score_opus":0.024710496671686632,"score_gpt":0.2690993401205313,"score_spread":0.2443888434488447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406464802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21361403,0.096377805,0.06373496,0.16817257,0.0017881722,0.000056201447,0.00012695484,0.00019455208,0.45593482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984126,0.004524365,0.004167424,0.0020830217,0.00032788306,0.000033418397,0.000021533435,0.000035765148,0.0046806396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986003,0.0009874369,0.000042480227,0.00010326786,0.00018412455,0.00008236986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676174,0.0023421824,0.0003053021,0.00019203611,0.00023122791,0.0001676199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031180957,0.00035335775,0.0004637005,0.0033594016,0.002420839,0.0047595142,0.00086659513,0.002455629,0.0035867111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006278203,0.0002704949,0.00035512735,0.0029700198,0.02879056,0.010049195,0.0034109794,0.003559154,0.00023567831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008146499,0.000008529913,0.00009587271,0.000046662906,0.000004391313,0.000069237976,0.0032893007,0.00012819769,0.000049256534,0.9911549,0.001955722,0.003189841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005958301,0.0000040584214,0.00017118372,0.000061019455,0.000002676754,0.00007583681,0.0011940834,0.0003351468,0.00003975401,0.989746,0.008359475,0.000004825685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027446682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00251658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047595142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00408647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014648819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029649496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408574690","doi":"10.1111/ejop.13057","title":"Parmenides and Dr. Strangelove, Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying about Monism and Accept the World of Relations, at least for the sake of the Good","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.07473006558338527,"score_gpt":0.2790832779192636,"score_spread":0.2043532123358783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408574690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031570022,0.038740896,0.0021561142,0.30535254,0.047689926,0.00010388705,0.0006223567,0.00086316234,0.6013141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022215895,0.011182008,0.0008226665,0.042591255,0.0058979406,0.00005968579,0.00021956558,0.00035897983,0.9166519],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962854,0.00009664164,0.00001197037,0.00008638316,0.000108012326,0.00006856684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993067,0.00009740132,0.000054789965,0.00002866055,0.0001425426,0.00036987447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042141622,0.0006466136,0.00027330444,0.0003707616,0.0029661523,0.0031731427,0.0005618235,0.0022405398,0.20157798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026916526,0.00025315443,0.00021258775,0.00036038386,0.0009843967,0.0031287097,0.0012769488,0.004305467,0.06759763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014387764,0.000007883235,0.000093573115,0.000036606492,0.000001203157,0.000067511086,0.00031059573,0.000005483169,0.00010577277,0.0025583555,0.9831645,0.013634116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030314345,0.000005690286,0.00016760407,0.000034597047,9.567311e-7,0.00020647507,0.0005741718,0.000012165978,0.00005407377,0.0002558944,0.9986827,0.00000255513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066409525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017462183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20157798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014921537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082994497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6743455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414677775","doi":"10.1111/ejop.70028","title":"The Quality of Thought. By DavidPittOxford: Oxford University Press, 2024. 238pp. <scp>ISBN</scp> : 9780198789901","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.027095152270274144,"score_gpt":0.290117995315331,"score_spread":0.26302284304505685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414677775","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003553587,0.92034715,0.0013350771,0.017334575,0.004590998,0.000013189365,0.0007077894,0.00022002224,0.055095904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012956188,0.61186993,0.00344078,0.0052244347,0.00454097,0.00012782731,0.0014771004,0.0004972453,0.35986555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989153,0.00024509637,0.00016376731,0.00018602914,0.00039154783,0.000098339275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978817,0.0010325296,0.000281704,0.0002019952,0.00040012557,0.00020186925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001647216,0.002266911,0.0019340042,0.0030286296,0.0014857033,0.0055135894,0.001280351,0.0029982817,0.10630528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037948485,0.0018732392,0.0008955197,0.0062735216,0.0030957006,0.009494965,0.0025102238,0.0033796788,0.05307583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066157096,0.000016498945,0.00019549725,0.0013257565,0.0000281132,0.000093430725,0.0005073803,0.00018633247,0.000267455,0.019545678,0.7546083,0.22315954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001186522,0.000014702821,0.0015322802,0.0019050641,0.000013351499,0.00027807796,0.00037733294,0.000098929326,0.00010290192,0.01682933,0.97882026,0.000015819109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009969426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019765818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10630528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030354648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027734677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35562658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}