{"meta":{"query_hash":"8c434c2ab54a","filters":{"venue":"European Journal of Philosophy"},"cohort_total":45,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":45,"exported":45,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8c434c2ab54a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Journal+of+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1606858490","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00458.x","title":"Self‐Constitution: Agency, Identity and Integrity, by Christine Korsgaard","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Identity (music); Constitution; Citation; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.12511658115560717,"score_gpt":0.32704721619681787,"score_spread":0.2019306350412107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606858490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023528496,0.0012717143,0.0010379525,0.007919872,0.00082922704,0.00008184696,0.000015096922,0.000054390337,0.9652614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518585,0.0004833163,0.001760662,0.0006964273,0.0017976126,2.2063954e-7,7.6127253e-7,0.000010637502,0.00006450009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777466,0.00089062407,0.00045820067,0.0001456737,0.00046860854,0.00026225287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988402,0.000083045095,0.00026167644,0.00012685284,0.00026484803,0.00042337508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029967376,0.0001294124,0.00020852847,0.00009290953,0.00043236828,0.00007328679,0.00046462627,0.000061340084,0.00017564288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005978995,0.00011513066,0.00011657729,0.00018278626,0.0010010969,0.00075797725,0.000101152065,0.0007445128,0.00010184037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002817293,0.00014010165,0.0005379024,0.000024353141,0.000043339223,0.0002111829,0.006892229,3.621876e-8,0.00005157094,0.9898562,0.0016174723,0.00059748103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006042197,0.00035684754,0.0027050297,0.00011832957,0.00009205726,0.00008585909,0.00025432804,0.0000014880989,0.000110921465,0.8956522,0.09976091,0.00025780816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007388235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000067532546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9716574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004853164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014415558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4694892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1619109582","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00375.x","title":"Identification, Meaning, and the Normativity of Social Roles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Meaning (existential); Normative; Identification (biology); Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03741833030012211,"score_gpt":0.30376812354538885,"score_spread":0.26634979324526675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1619109582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056441415,0.00036382998,0.00047044904,0.14646609,0.00022406132,0.000097191056,0.000006242241,0.0000160378,0.7959147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976396,0.00006071103,0.000052149535,0.00087264157,0.001328831,7.707752e-8,1.8260299e-7,0.0000046638065,0.000041141422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974858,0.0014615844,0.00044722616,0.00006158541,0.00041281458,0.00013096922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989082,0.00020391087,0.0004620186,0.000079648824,0.00025638132,0.00008979662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046086935,0.00006684152,0.00017736387,0.000056376808,0.0004449072,0.000051833034,0.00032637044,0.000025475778,0.000014211407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007543777,0.0000459131,0.00011666207,0.00012748392,0.0010455935,0.00025381093,0.000023941131,0.00029492853,0.000009589687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053744956,0.000035413086,0.000016724378,0.000005230858,0.000015703541,0.000005065517,0.023927545,0.0000013957025,0.0001135459,0.9740169,0.00028984412,0.0015189103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067221985,0.00007795558,0.005145261,0.000028526467,0.000039387563,0.0000060379916,0.00060090463,0.000004239135,0.0000969187,0.98820114,0.0050622355,0.0000651795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000044935455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020489617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94119817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015024796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049322516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3852533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1630121611","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12033","title":"What Is Social Construction?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Task (project management); Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Trait; Social constructionism; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.028944922382972162,"score_gpt":0.28475352423726097,"score_spread":0.25580860185428883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1630121611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09148939,0.00041048494,0.0004044529,0.036037117,0.003903143,0.00008827756,0.000003281179,0.000024396857,0.8676395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937643,0.000021666185,0.00039037148,0.002895827,0.002714436,7.1401496e-7,2.8270117e-7,0.000017603898,0.0001948339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984366,0.0004610315,0.00043662748,0.00016069968,0.00027886487,0.00022615118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990962,0.000054891556,0.00031667107,0.00016027733,0.00018256051,0.00018938365],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000591967,0.00012215092,0.00018299329,0.00009968539,0.00014408217,0.00013766778,0.00045806114,0.000029570749,0.006808394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025069405,0.00009533002,0.00017784655,0.00019192926,0.00053840573,0.0006816681,0.00005381024,0.00032644486,0.0038051123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043693297,0.000106805965,0.000082071114,0.0000036893712,0.00006975887,0.00014699469,0.0025096051,2.9037224e-7,0.00044093144,0.95436996,0.0069281897,0.035297982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007844486,0.00036810184,0.006636235,0.000045419507,0.000026173437,0.0004628279,0.00051601883,0.0000017922224,0.00013203408,0.9803367,0.010516751,0.00017346197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.4772165e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.0456378e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90227485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015965621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000132031855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99697053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767128526","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00344.x","title":"Fichte's Voluntarism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntarism (philosophy); Ambiguity; Normative; Philosophy; Epistemology; Reading (process); Virtue; Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04099479778610383,"score_gpt":0.22951792431733367,"score_spread":0.18852312653122985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767128526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015453571,0.00054129295,0.0001362831,0.028548645,0.00095066323,0.000040939936,0.0000072008447,0.000033176897,0.95428824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874443,0.000024444229,0.00017441365,0.0050190943,0.0069721634,6.991835e-8,0.0000013531135,0.000021840438,0.00034235348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986463,0.00025667055,0.00050027965,0.00011056556,0.0003136759,0.00017249299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990236,0.000059357768,0.00032533455,0.00017987503,0.00024995647,0.0001618732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010366231,0.00014591418,0.00022366042,0.00014747503,0.00018590335,0.0001188502,0.00040075602,0.000019785688,0.00080574176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008546874,0.0001113829,0.00022350322,0.000034081808,0.00020718969,0.000247764,0.000028347886,0.0006091106,0.00030947197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005736501,0.00010787889,0.000002127221,0.0000050852605,0.000032658823,0.00031760897,0.003502858,0.000004364706,0.00012221905,0.9894672,0.0016930344,0.0046876217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040540437,0.00066672865,0.00014127199,0.00006448268,0.000024597315,0.000039754384,0.000051856685,0.000004125012,0.000022594484,0.8020795,0.1963783,0.00012138686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000010474278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.2876217e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9719907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017006763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027067194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88223076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767433069","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00538.x","title":"Reflective Rationality and the Claim of <i><scp>D</scp>ialectic of <scp>E</scp>nlightenment</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Enlightenment; Criticism; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Focus (optics); Core (optical fiber); Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Social science; Physics","score_opus":0.045757609987603455,"score_gpt":0.31076498453230494,"score_spread":0.26500737454470147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767433069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2974509,0.0027663684,0.0003535277,0.0034716516,0.0006814479,0.000252373,0.000024549428,0.000014592744,0.69498456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99605817,0.00023133426,0.00030041812,0.0005281328,0.0026479824,0.000001169772,0.0000011291357,0.00002237475,0.00020927904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419695,0.003750617,0.00080120965,0.00015772428,0.00076209864,0.0003313901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943335,0.003934729,0.00076181325,0.00021788263,0.00045675674,0.00029533546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074468846,0.00017834836,0.00044734127,0.00023598695,0.0003970613,0.00004330428,0.00047135248,0.000054757627,0.000034009405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047131907,0.00012673053,0.0002871485,0.0007952293,0.0016970525,0.00046736706,0.00009877405,0.00044142155,0.000024750645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091589834,0.00027883463,0.00085184566,0.00004516432,0.00015565119,0.000011135885,0.023681605,0.000005366671,0.0012254925,0.9721759,0.0011947267,0.00028267328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021701707,0.0004935293,0.0034509758,0.00016353407,0.00025629095,0.00004429122,0.0033283487,0.000002837336,0.003179258,0.9255005,0.06133574,0.00007451927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000069882162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.264168e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69860727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044661916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000807796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62528604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893143918","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2008.00340.x","title":"Indeterminacy, A Priority, and Analyticity in the Quinean Critique","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Criticism; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.028492220899522924,"score_gpt":0.32162412766552356,"score_spread":0.29313190676600065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893143918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46534452,0.00036476552,0.0002751425,0.02119261,0.00018058982,0.000088228626,0.0000023232976,0.000008663774,0.51254314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541885,0.000014381536,0.000119460594,0.003773924,0.00065394747,2.0991233e-7,1.551813e-7,0.0000065163413,0.000012573728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789613,0.0010620903,0.00041823654,0.00016121377,0.00024862515,0.00021368213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992732,0.00015006804,0.00017762918,0.00022040778,0.000053343618,0.00012536586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026015742,0.000119325094,0.00019272539,0.00013969306,0.000068368376,0.00005210341,0.00059171394,0.000025318264,0.000057401197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016012565,0.00007606989,0.00008491692,0.00028403575,0.00026092544,0.00015373366,0.000038664515,0.0005129141,0.000028362258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013624055,0.00029482783,0.0008070097,0.000004379262,0.000011688096,0.0021624812,0.0032582285,9.91599e-7,0.0001855406,0.97824246,0.00019459752,0.01470157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008676049,0.0014915776,0.21198386,0.00006809707,0.000022906272,0.00092579355,0.0001253149,0.000011019776,0.000029210869,0.7834415,0.000897102,0.000136032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000023262294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.758245e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5300743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012764643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013421269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.310204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921503942","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00469.x","title":"Can We Be Self‐Deceived about What We Believe? Self‐Knowledge, Self‐Deception, and Rational Agency","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Self-deception; Order (exchange); Relation (database); Self-knowledge; Epistemology; Content (measure theory); Social psychology; Psychology; Self; Common knowledge (logic); Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09298263487289923,"score_gpt":0.2563550489335183,"score_spread":0.16337241406061906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921503942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27443188,0.03421409,0.00018392786,0.032466628,0.010984112,0.0007184325,0.00011363596,0.00047089276,0.6464164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97382444,0.013273671,0.002356542,0.0013513389,0.007191351,0.0000026770035,0.000012259712,0.00009700079,0.0018907291],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730456,0.00085054594,0.00087530015,0.00029837177,0.0003559353,0.00031526317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776673,0.0001252004,0.0006921236,0.0002713467,0.00085663155,0.0002879596],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012202824,0.00033886987,0.00044699624,0.00024678608,0.0005678246,0.00026741362,0.00041842335,0.000061991515,0.000670319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044232518,0.0002884587,0.00025580428,0.000070405324,0.00039678122,0.00094876013,0.000091916074,0.0006556866,0.00016919358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009381832,0.0011290275,0.0002340665,0.00028733592,0.0007498895,0.0002099903,0.5816098,0.0000019179906,0.00020936402,0.4015,0.009154275,0.004820536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028164797,0.0016552496,0.0046068695,0.0007922623,0.00061249005,0.0002521679,0.005309438,0.000022870165,0.0002079732,0.24379864,0.7390032,0.0009223865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000046877512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040728042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7298489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005129007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016381955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1960060320","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00470.x","title":"The Sortal Dependence of Demonstrative Reference","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Demonstrative; Section (typography); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Analytic philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Contemporary philosophy","score_opus":0.09231159508628632,"score_gpt":0.2930264726876792,"score_spread":0.20071487760139284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1960060320","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061388634,0.00035424533,0.0009354525,0.00043039967,0.00047619716,0.000049326158,0.0000047715525,0.0000074441286,0.9363535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990208,0.000026327398,0.00052912656,0.00009596456,0.00025117034,4.197704e-7,1.237672e-7,0.000010511354,0.00006551682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980426,0.0007329049,0.0005618006,0.00014309559,0.0003075847,0.00021201924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860007,0.00021662471,0.00056538853,0.00028147805,0.00018663761,0.00014979327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016550212,0.00011423201,0.00017512578,0.000054553948,0.0001277703,0.000012895507,0.0009595813,0.000023611065,0.00038288953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017193668,0.00006733713,0.00012520821,0.00017871556,0.00092538906,0.00014125061,0.000070482485,0.00038416448,0.00018006375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024651497,0.00010581851,0.00028814015,0.000002096732,0.000052694588,0.0002516661,0.0015310877,3.4631756e-7,0.00057569344,0.9920646,0.0000580831,0.0048232866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005876498,0.0016449443,0.03512851,0.000084378065,0.00004594229,0.00038585532,0.00037453265,0.000002235805,0.0019917488,0.9586966,0.00089093635,0.00016667265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000022670076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.5376074e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9376322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007753542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031714237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41923717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147140839","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00558.x","title":"Form and Matter in <scp>K</scp>antian Political Philosophy: A Reply","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Politics; Formalism (music); Democracy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.05648923519298995,"score_gpt":0.3074033206871867,"score_spread":0.25091408549419675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147140839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14440627,0.0006625192,0.000047967736,0.057652753,0.00063835055,0.00011689616,0.000010003855,0.000025935151,0.7964393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98158574,0.00006301494,0.0004206129,0.010781846,0.0069596996,7.4981796e-7,0.0000010637682,0.00004251232,0.00014474646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620384,0.0011206666,0.00076211756,0.00020330117,0.0006440051,0.0010660891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746627,0.00072519586,0.00027481306,0.00022485341,0.00015558099,0.0011533072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038299432,0.0002242047,0.00037337843,0.000307032,0.00028196492,0.00009241977,0.00044729578,0.00009202508,0.0000736813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017779482,0.00020127695,0.00018454036,0.0002770407,0.00085833884,0.000910843,0.00012714049,0.00096189143,0.00034024855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001906991,0.0001886809,0.01322634,0.000042256586,0.000030228268,0.0001697839,0.009049683,3.6452252e-7,0.000031612944,0.97550136,0.001581492,0.00015914167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009133034,0.0002441201,0.032607466,0.0002531759,0.00005117816,0.00014492919,0.0013496211,0.0000016733795,0.000046233483,0.8850489,0.07916625,0.00017314455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042066586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036381596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8371795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011479486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001068592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8207836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170324378","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2007.00274.x","title":"That Which Makes the Sensation of Blue a Mental Fact: Moore on Phenomenal Relationism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Consciousness; Reading (process); Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Relation (database); Aesthetics; Linguistics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.04427498944427264,"score_gpt":0.28872666782177375,"score_spread":0.24445167837750112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170324378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42378357,0.0001002251,0.0015102605,0.006385586,0.00077361614,0.000104186445,0.000009450118,0.000010744353,0.5673224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833333,0.000005781481,0.00013092217,0.0005393018,0.0008896903,2.3875262e-7,0.0000020287064,0.000017700382,0.000080995254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981262,0.00048578196,0.0005154379,0.00015782285,0.00049853,0.00021623225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870896,0.00024485204,0.0005482974,0.00024598834,0.00012540277,0.00012651594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026313826,0.00013552773,0.00016839684,0.00013029126,0.00016161591,0.000023665656,0.00041608058,0.000031491418,0.00026461814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089479625,0.00008527198,0.00012855104,0.00026393076,0.00029800183,0.00012623332,0.000039971277,0.0004114455,0.00015894325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058255775,0.0002431919,0.0005418605,0.0000045514194,0.00009141833,0.0001212906,0.006954986,0.00006815178,0.0021952176,0.9841989,0.00019012504,0.0048077237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039135036,0.0037738476,0.18243334,0.0002755355,0.00013856977,0.00068293203,0.0018942065,0.000057895337,0.0069144117,0.79303616,0.0063563692,0.00052324985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.797461e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.025552e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5745498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003509584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014816502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34772906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557269476","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12189","title":"Persons and Properties: A Sartrean Perspective on Love's Object","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Perspective (graphical); Object (grammar); Identity (music); Epistemology; Key (lock); Philosophy; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Aesthetics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.047840225828495155,"score_gpt":0.27843647246479786,"score_spread":0.2305962466363027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557269476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22220798,0.0014223303,0.000089690686,0.023220496,0.0008605718,0.00012281525,0.0000197811,0.000030126603,0.7520262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953674,0.000026928667,0.0000755637,0.0010329109,0.001779438,6.6389657e-7,2.1109392e-7,0.000049229988,0.0016676612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981449,0.00068810774,0.00038749093,0.0003014922,0.00019253293,0.0002854571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989434,0.000088122484,0.00032689856,0.00029667653,0.00014452348,0.00020039648],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005401452,0.0002264878,0.00030312318,0.00027178938,0.000097875716,0.000023068767,0.00029758364,0.00004392814,0.0004705184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001119357,0.00013578178,0.00017347572,0.0001055586,0.00039772893,0.00017053982,0.00006319985,0.00033583562,0.001654157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012403228,0.002753799,0.0021826348,0.00006913382,0.003705385,0.007535692,0.086354405,0.0000059782346,0.049210444,0.77720517,0.03390463,0.024669506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.037266795,0.0465252,0.06312331,0.003150731,0.0010376555,0.008202929,0.017005187,0.000004050905,0.0022690932,0.7299471,0.08818028,0.0032876688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002680592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.884744e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7731594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079785306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002640691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560787606","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12192","title":"Synthetic Evidence and Objective Identity: The Contemporary Significance of Early Husserl's Conception of Truth","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence theory of truth; Epistemology; Philosophy; Phenomenology (philosophy); Pragmatic theory of truth; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Alethiology; Logical truth; Philosophical logic; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08191326235035216,"score_gpt":0.3054586561400981,"score_spread":0.22354539378974592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560787606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93196297,0.0044783154,0.0010721732,0.0032216383,0.0009492183,0.00020639476,0.000022939093,0.000011121353,0.05807524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991932,0.00008505338,0.000043660864,0.0000991874,0.00050475646,0.000001512311,1.5023296e-7,0.000021668113,0.000050831328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731684,0.001307521,0.00072843157,0.00020331968,0.00029861432,0.00014530066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974656,0.00059764343,0.0011814715,0.00033415132,0.00034343902,0.0000777034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001733977,0.0001460297,0.000362538,0.00014161947,0.00006609596,0.0000111979025,0.00049025565,0.00003859977,0.00011013915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034460088,0.00008621538,0.00015274005,0.00015002194,0.0010053166,0.00048933894,0.00007575584,0.00022292025,0.00004343763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00964811,0.0011298307,0.024462555,0.0002696847,0.0023772572,0.00071445905,0.02450424,0.0000054201605,0.16404977,0.75238544,0.0015803628,0.018872853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005340013,0.009428076,0.31660345,0.002690088,0.00041328464,0.00033759416,0.0013689911,0.0000013669465,0.0046805413,0.65802443,0.000584191,0.00052798097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007790555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.6462297e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2921409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002089566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049542123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3704131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779697511","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12323","title":"Modesty as an excellence in moral perspective taking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Privilege (computing); Perspective (graphical); Excellence; Sociology; Social psychology; Odds; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15713229334859877,"score_gpt":0.3922224374784783,"score_spread":0.23509014412987952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779697511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1836267,0.00010160099,0.00005667826,0.023620918,0.000406558,0.000055194712,0.0000022807951,0.000013684206,0.7921164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959213,0.00006539345,0.00035656244,0.00058652984,0.0029412266,2.3306887e-7,1.4388e-7,0.000018781506,0.000109813824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975886,0.0010180052,0.00035303217,0.00018145291,0.00052297575,0.00033597494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983412,0.00009366783,0.0005749847,0.00032295389,0.0003072647,0.00035992695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029969052,0.00012143844,0.00021212327,0.00012477378,0.00087088585,0.00022439238,0.0011432021,0.00004941599,0.00007070885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023709743,0.00011292376,0.00012126001,0.00007361271,0.0008811881,0.0011241457,0.00009677943,0.00073242,0.00008378775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062351755,0.00011242378,0.0011771879,0.000004364387,0.0000105118115,0.0007243781,0.014656458,0.000030736435,0.000045888028,0.9824413,0.000020415693,0.0007139945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046850223,0.00028242983,0.012848601,0.00013998947,0.000012033282,0.000017763843,0.0017571792,0.000026581747,0.000024434761,0.9833801,0.00088453246,0.0001578746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005391247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057389858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8122946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014830311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021107685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66982377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790276528","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12331","title":"Freedom and poverty in the Kantian state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Ideal (ethics); Poverty; State (computer science); Salient; Negative liberty; Law and economics; Power (physics); Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05561043220587807,"score_gpt":0.3084853928907133,"score_spread":0.2528749606848352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790276528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100524396,0.0001974339,0.00009709191,0.085950896,0.000603396,0.00007769557,0.00000642604,0.000010916189,0.81253177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912886,0.00008559128,0.00018558552,0.005033291,0.0033581923,8.449523e-8,1.0953456e-7,0.000008715784,0.000039829298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976937,0.0013188161,0.000291568,0.00008587736,0.00038281447,0.00022723098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924165,0.00023655455,0.0001351883,0.00011289631,0.0001274797,0.00014625276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037276563,0.00007544483,0.00011750121,0.00008069194,0.00028184202,0.00007911564,0.00042867052,0.00002180458,0.00003906786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005887803,0.00004924299,0.000057049656,0.00018148076,0.0009445383,0.00022361026,0.000040215757,0.00041372768,0.00005729428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011158141,0.00012890778,0.0013134307,0.000013541007,0.00003164044,0.00047892335,0.053089004,0.0000027294925,0.000075879696,0.93674755,0.0049616476,0.0030451897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058795855,0.0004454017,0.014656243,0.000082534134,0.000015863097,0.000032701464,0.0007231585,0.0000053429844,0.000015865204,0.905943,0.077366695,0.00012525813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056782726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053012882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89076424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001865788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006274546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34801906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892779792","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12402","title":"Subjectivism, instrumentalism, and prudentialism about reasons: On the normativity of instrumental transmission","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Subjectivism; Epistemology; Normative; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03679851788301667,"score_gpt":0.23511054665569092,"score_spread":0.19831202877267426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892779792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6941592,0.0001728271,0.000043660777,0.008682597,0.000489952,0.00008501825,0.000036698533,0.000011307579,0.29631874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970345,0.00009235408,0.000045804096,0.0011379629,0.0016178774,3.854696e-7,0.0000015342561,0.000025409794,0.00004417061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981875,0.00067348237,0.00048075896,0.00012572964,0.00039747788,0.00013506981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989208,0.00014162442,0.00044541335,0.00017810336,0.00020689625,0.0001071574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012570493,0.00015898742,0.0002259549,0.000103281935,0.00033761805,0.000095212316,0.00027838052,0.000024215004,0.00045225426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006471292,0.000097844604,0.00014486985,0.000046927584,0.001174055,0.00026141797,0.00007635208,0.00043806175,0.000030260368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024313148,0.00018782847,0.000014289638,0.00003432405,0.000092398266,0.0000477987,0.014180418,2.1843172e-7,0.0012493146,0.9764915,0.000162427,0.0072963377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015710841,0.002050328,0.00087868545,0.0008370852,0.000086593835,0.00018677747,0.0007024483,0.000014115807,0.01031702,0.93587303,0.047232676,0.00025014897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000052179644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029429762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3028753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016783144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034820263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49518672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893543469","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12387","title":"<i>Kant's Modal Metaphysics</i>: A reply to my critics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Modal; Citation; Philosophy of language; Theology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.056446340594814695,"score_gpt":0.258715153573243,"score_spread":0.2022688129784283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893543469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031973515,0.00020968512,0.0007638404,0.042106874,0.002219593,0.000110729125,0.000044956872,0.000054569322,0.9225162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95995593,0.00001220074,0.00047761842,0.020721545,0.018512402,5.3546336e-7,0.0000012672741,0.00006145773,0.00025705373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979922,0.0003960888,0.0006537843,0.0002091791,0.00047034657,0.00027840273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800676,0.0001146297,0.0002949684,0.0003462159,0.0009091317,0.0003282815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014389986,0.00021497702,0.00033653344,0.0002090441,0.00033960352,0.00020494989,0.000591627,0.000018919078,0.0005385716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025187814,0.00017126874,0.00028678615,0.00008637217,0.0006618759,0.00030644436,0.00014110148,0.00053922477,0.00084896316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012754613,0.00012914835,0.0000014475938,0.000017100285,0.00010289061,0.00019744136,0.008765705,0.0000033398894,0.0005492758,0.9855329,0.0034866983,0.0010865346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003594666,0.0010840761,0.000014260882,0.00010628273,0.00005450368,0.00003114062,0.00012954998,0.000007497844,0.00029069002,0.6626143,0.33512485,0.00018336244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000037408947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001768726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9279824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019761877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050488023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908572182","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12428","title":"Freedom immediately after Kant","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Action (physics); Philosophy; Transcendental number; Moral philosophy; Practical reason; Key (lock); Natural (archaeology); Natural law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.026664205756671226,"score_gpt":0.20767946402723214,"score_spread":0.18101525827056092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908572182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22824554,0.00080938666,0.000019037492,0.007676559,0.002928148,0.00008114133,0.000023406423,0.00002421466,0.7601926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906451,0.000040678286,0.000057045523,0.0018908982,0.006827006,4.224874e-7,0.0000014993384,0.00004678206,0.0004905465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846095,0.0002929564,0.0005320815,0.00014035901,0.0003734575,0.00020019246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989148,0.00009827598,0.00033021957,0.00023339131,0.00025632995,0.00016699129],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010986034,0.00016739026,0.00027060354,0.0001555453,0.00007866164,0.0001162901,0.0003927213,0.000023117484,0.0036734473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055496534,0.00012140748,0.0002635199,0.000031680884,0.0002700342,0.00027401347,0.000084448526,0.00060792605,0.0023787108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002423367,0.000107270505,0.00006306989,0.00003518613,0.000086739805,0.00048187576,0.004798646,0.000009714763,0.00020104088,0.9929252,0.00040897014,0.00063993543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011879654,0.00081647746,0.0005276129,0.00021511417,0.000044634053,0.00005389919,0.00015661279,0.000010945768,0.000035054843,0.7669786,0.22969896,0.00027412636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000014677377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.387854e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76239955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016337326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032709726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99839807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941903897","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12452","title":"Phenomenological reduction in Merleau‐Ponty's <i>The Structure of Behavior</i>: An alternative approach to the naturalization of phenomenology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Naturalization; Transcendental number; Psychology; Interpretative phenomenological analysis; Philosophy; Sociology; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.0373844363406729,"score_gpt":0.28428627270247514,"score_spread":0.24690183636180224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941903897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9482358,0.00054540153,0.00022003667,0.001644409,0.0016999596,0.00049558113,0.000025877458,0.0000097341635,0.047123175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983515,0.000013838829,0.0003592126,0.00029699088,0.0008819775,0.0000027304413,0.000013959987,0.000033191875,0.000046567744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964011,0.0017607922,0.0009585805,0.0003149036,0.00029272927,0.00027191217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801564,0.000060173923,0.0010297616,0.00057072466,0.0002434979,0.00008021498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008976783,0.00022509282,0.00048464735,0.0003493053,0.0000725038,0.00001192622,0.0011282989,0.000094377225,0.00018846845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004132397,0.00013683029,0.00013876185,0.00049163605,0.00035273563,0.00019256346,0.00012930112,0.0007699688,0.00003950467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048981863,0.0032578276,0.0032431285,0.000087146975,0.0009812338,0.00010385815,0.08507788,0.011065225,0.101297565,0.7807623,0.00045696137,0.008768674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023233911,0.03791143,0.2337574,0.0004835614,0.0014820406,0.0039755884,0.0379223,0.00024572702,0.0063625453,0.6414427,0.01048865,0.0026941309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012354807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011629354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23051427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004621413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023815423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55797774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969367414","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12470","title":"A mereological argument for the non‐spatiotemporality of things in themselves","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Mereology; Metaphysics; Transcendental idealism; Transcendental number; Idealism","score_opus":0.05849393349855538,"score_gpt":0.2516204625390472,"score_spread":0.1931265290404918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969367414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5681201,0.00086422305,0.0004666072,0.040421423,0.001311078,0.0006144339,0.000027065615,0.000015298783,0.38815978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777424,0.00003206892,0.00011593686,0.0011677771,0.00078931253,0.0000012118852,9.709422e-7,0.000016162214,0.00010229333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865204,0.00026901992,0.00059667043,0.00010661358,0.00024754272,0.0001281042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986028,0.00047003356,0.00049603166,0.00018517114,0.00019979345,0.000046159716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027307642,0.000114189344,0.00027488807,0.00008134403,0.00007907632,0.00003774403,0.00042866642,0.000021846594,0.0002884555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012455088,0.00006254925,0.00022749063,0.00003208556,0.00030572075,0.00016619833,0.000065942375,0.00039456494,0.000024108615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021433186,0.00014471349,0.0001652073,0.000054586155,0.000064947446,0.0000111726995,0.0100677805,0.000028430333,0.00024157505,0.9883356,0.000066104345,0.0006055659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011002348,0.00080215704,0.0010105447,0.00017249846,0.000030143772,0.0000052432392,0.00046520625,0.0001351084,0.00012703339,0.9802524,0.015783262,0.00011621276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000083545965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017123383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42965418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013133586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027986836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31583855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003522419","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12518","title":"Discovering the virtue of hope","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"University of Leeds; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Phenomenon; Philosophy; Epistemic virtue; Environmental ethics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030702734245187224,"score_gpt":0.26187906128823035,"score_spread":0.23117632704304314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003522419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.326032,0.00091513165,0.0022763791,0.014405079,0.001075516,0.00010027365,0.000006896265,0.000019805311,0.6551689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99571085,0.00003540354,0.00022270948,0.0017500046,0.0021324928,1.9069505e-7,4.83398e-7,0.000041501207,0.00010638958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985213,0.00045963642,0.00052990613,0.00012896603,0.00021297949,0.0001471558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990512,0.000078204685,0.0004465516,0.0002229868,0.00007103158,0.00013002483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059334957,0.0001267114,0.00023232595,0.000054696662,0.000064077394,0.00002826076,0.000556399,0.000016309914,0.00026161637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067145615,0.00008387041,0.00020281688,0.00016443737,0.00009616633,0.00013062116,0.00009001195,0.00038602963,0.00024322665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006129574,0.0017134163,0.012740406,0.00048790016,0.004146158,0.012398859,0.18489659,0.011057224,0.05782852,0.50653964,0.08302955,0.11903217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03383104,0.026204348,0.16810529,0.0028114435,0.0020841684,0.003398678,0.017496035,0.00089760165,0.016086502,0.054932166,0.6698559,0.004296856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000016534384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.826897e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6696788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007512712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016321226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3420136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010843317","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12499","title":"Frege on the generality of logical laws","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Normative; Epistemology; Philosophy of logic; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.12467164183243024,"score_gpt":0.2947887513210711,"score_spread":0.17011710948864084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010843317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1728448,0.00015351106,0.00056862115,0.06855336,0.00036531693,0.000063241656,0.000012357667,0.00001179382,0.757427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900918,0.0000052189016,0.00012519957,0.0082251495,0.00152302,2.473188e-7,2.609216e-7,0.000011472778,0.000017607097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977247,0.0011558208,0.00046589223,0.00015986306,0.0003305129,0.00016320663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891895,0.0002157661,0.0003357626,0.00023771058,0.00007810706,0.00021370687],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011839198,0.000113634065,0.00021384894,0.000028562969,0.000063724285,0.000013320928,0.00079027395,0.00002237241,0.0012433443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002786712,0.000061559054,0.00020268507,0.00020771833,0.00044811232,0.000049103233,0.000076900644,0.0004248269,0.0004210184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002518079,0.00013469334,0.000059347964,0.0000037906264,0.000036736797,0.00024078671,0.00062984275,0.0000132102805,0.0015408059,0.99457884,0.0017306699,0.0007794737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014237339,0.0042349645,0.011289802,0.00007912613,0.000056337805,0.00011654033,0.00008691955,0.000024714327,0.002006115,0.9622426,0.018179698,0.0002594679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.3486e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.664442e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81724703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000698654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010317852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011924815","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12536","title":"On the putative possibility of non‐spatio‐temporal forms of sensibility in Kant","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensibility; Philosophy; Criticism; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Argument (complex analysis); Intellect; Value (mathematics); Meaning (existential); Mathematics; Literature","score_opus":0.07501238814444404,"score_gpt":0.2595617121317797,"score_spread":0.18454932398733565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011924815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89205456,0.000055200275,0.000058351314,0.015291526,0.00012257864,0.0001395902,0.000062392486,0.000004940816,0.092210874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982348,0.00000536845,0.000037315804,0.0012625408,0.00043579238,2.6627157e-7,0.0000023047678,0.000017449964,0.0000041734047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771965,0.00068723015,0.0009448494,0.00014893456,0.00037770683,0.000121622834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808335,0.00044268352,0.00079091056,0.000210749,0.00037373148,0.000098565884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002410521,0.00014357438,0.00038500677,0.00007980118,0.000070154885,0.000021375545,0.00033672218,0.000021227404,0.00017668772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006774349,0.00008259248,0.00023937775,0.00008227581,0.0006734513,0.0001409863,0.00006049011,0.0006316883,0.000013639899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084091193,0.00029157527,0.00022997762,0.00009384874,0.000076509226,0.000074290096,0.032595623,0.00011435095,0.0003772849,0.9648059,0.00004219263,0.00045751478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071286404,0.001528303,0.0017643332,0.00015522237,0.000023154336,0.0000024924047,0.0006780706,0.00019362643,0.0009179796,0.9937143,0.0002070269,0.00010263308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010150466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009583751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10618024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016832166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006354336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33680236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022921090","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12542","title":"Why you cannot make people better by telling them what is good","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ceteris paribus; Pessimism; Optimism; Trustworthiness; Core (optical fiber); Social psychology; Psychology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12062070411926878,"score_gpt":0.38226779381840226,"score_spread":0.2616470896991335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022921090","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01887579,0.0017352053,0.0038636068,0.84354955,0.0021429476,0.00024298357,0.000028323453,0.000058499616,0.12950307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5524527,0.0011740153,0.0023089643,0.43657395,0.0070685446,0.0000013747358,0.000005725319,0.00011744869,0.00029729985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908579,0.0061258622,0.0012849356,0.00028140715,0.0010044243,0.0004454851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951241,0.002248547,0.0012221244,0.00032054118,0.00044166006,0.00064300693],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064775585,0.00023357083,0.00044628244,0.00006244819,0.0006796671,0.00007330613,0.0008042338,0.00011964585,0.002121804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027507003,0.00019040625,0.00018422985,0.00028243245,0.00011788747,0.00065379613,0.00024447095,0.0072335205,0.0020051405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036907487,0.00021263446,0.0039590886,0.0005518591,0.00030069705,0.0011585422,0.05178821,0.000008542564,0.0027203965,0.002879185,0.9256666,0.0103851855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012983311,0.00043823282,0.00020761955,0.0010087019,0.00013394169,0.00006791636,0.004611851,0.000042549986,0.00020723425,0.013882893,0.97779316,0.00030754192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007724172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014851296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5335769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006520083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015087964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3069891404","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12578","title":"Astell, friendship, and relational autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Interpretation (philosophy); Autonomy; Virtue; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.08392156477992745,"score_gpt":0.2136987591342853,"score_spread":0.12977719435435786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3069891404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117967255,0.0017877256,0.0003409277,0.018694703,0.0005348808,0.000052483956,0.000007988183,0.000024227118,0.8605898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933958,0.00008095429,0.00036880272,0.0017680377,0.0041117785,1.3173984e-7,0.000002016347,0.000019380654,0.00025306648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991639,0.00010584037,0.00034239198,0.000100084064,0.00019376431,0.00009396828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994732,0.000023538641,0.00020156824,0.000059588525,0.00007876957,0.00016332652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002192051,0.000098747434,0.00013230633,0.000052460502,0.00013422372,0.00008043149,0.0001170227,0.000008166918,0.00054186844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017531502,0.00007675298,0.00008260095,0.000018744768,0.000097695396,0.0001953692,0.000035875848,0.00016920318,0.00015572453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009851203,0.000055312386,0.0003637732,0.000033754226,0.00012441998,0.00020962924,0.21197817,0.00006040999,0.00007817471,0.7602101,0.024728527,0.0020592064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006083471,0.00044401764,0.0007125975,0.000034797016,0.000032241267,0.00004201164,0.0040968126,0.00003654973,0.00002140576,0.012453301,0.9813871,0.00013086102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.884225e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.3079303e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95665854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012002517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031433137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.593308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084066437","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12570","title":"Kant and the concept of an object","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Object (grammar); Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05493437188890296,"score_gpt":0.23077315576311294,"score_spread":0.17583878387420998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084066437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19700728,0.0033195624,0.00011560965,0.11413383,0.00068002933,0.00018723856,0.000054161403,0.000030621,0.68447167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929402,0.000039147213,0.000036253823,0.003971221,0.0029812956,1.1453589e-7,6.76962e-7,0.000018034169,0.000013087901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859303,0.0006171446,0.0004082548,0.00008448131,0.0002146213,0.00008246524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910104,0.00015491353,0.00034144885,0.000107843196,0.00016128522,0.00013344758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009919055,0.00009622959,0.00024710255,0.00003302801,0.00012269088,0.000059322774,0.0002958278,0.000010675133,0.00019155923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016244366,0.000053693235,0.00012407202,0.000024302939,0.0011405126,0.00015156061,0.00006303263,0.00037840105,0.0000114571585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027834962,0.000027954366,6.972239e-7,0.000013467662,0.000052198207,0.000061969935,0.029653873,0.0000064807073,0.00009542294,0.9687204,0.000064286534,0.001024906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025125132,0.0011861325,0.000029139681,0.00007363963,0.00007074879,0.000034648583,0.0008598666,0.000071540184,0.00021890094,0.96717197,0.027650688,0.00012024342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000018671674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.4709105e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7959329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000024858948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020346743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4202266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106919281","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12621","title":"Bergson on Kant and the freedom of the <i>moi en général</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02173252195253802,"score_gpt":0.18261435035901524,"score_spread":0.16088182840647722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106919281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27210754,0.0004637576,0.00003639785,0.2678493,0.00044253608,0.00021028226,0.000030342855,0.000016861457,0.45884296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99342036,0.000025148403,0.000008850564,0.0035839553,0.0028903517,3.1129588e-7,2.5558788e-7,0.000016520871,0.000054268938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809325,0.0008633697,0.00048200067,0.00011261987,0.00034605374,0.00010270707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904436,0.00023755089,0.00032969334,0.0001758757,0.00010259961,0.000109925735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069958455,0.00012961628,0.00031140744,0.000035468755,0.0001809006,0.000058866295,0.0005163049,0.000010174993,0.0002489001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021812957,0.000054869768,0.00030877723,0.000067878595,0.00096282834,0.000069143534,0.0001434701,0.0003944642,0.00003520037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040590233,0.00011362397,0.000042520456,0.000011466161,0.0001704637,0.00003616713,0.010481279,0.000022294751,0.000070368085,0.9877288,0.00037373204,0.0005433883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051131514,0.0025146077,0.00063888653,0.00021638458,0.0007294415,0.000028324777,0.0011582357,0.00024239055,0.00029375535,0.9527313,0.03604765,0.00028589062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000034917816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012630217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7213128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004557044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008135737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3547581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126173817","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12630","title":"Perfectionism and dignity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectionism (psychology); Dignity; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06722999545208067,"score_gpt":0.3119351195248794,"score_spread":0.24470512407279874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126173817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06781457,0.0007014139,0.00025098253,0.03938299,0.0006412702,0.000024693847,0.0000028854113,0.000018510154,0.8911627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951837,0.00024702557,0.0003171342,0.0012846478,0.002712012,6.1097666e-8,2.9679575e-7,0.000009282078,0.0002458154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981598,0.001073694,0.00022893422,0.000087806475,0.00029078554,0.0001589642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991111,0.00015731351,0.00010738141,0.00007995319,0.00027854444,0.0002657178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015371548,0.00006317267,0.00012152892,0.00004380989,0.00041807897,0.00008308859,0.00012448896,0.000027837363,0.000091915565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000903255,0.000058848207,0.000087938504,0.00012476895,0.00037565804,0.00021286486,0.000044604443,0.00038831015,0.00004273063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001590415,0.00008500355,0.00036078182,0.000015495098,0.00003421268,0.00062448706,0.004435935,0.000001988438,0.00031492606,0.9905385,0.0004990966,0.0030736744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004727948,0.00016508567,0.0045365845,0.00007837624,0.000040531937,0.00014504713,0.00055109843,0.0000012313147,0.00025245146,0.8649267,0.12868549,0.00014463415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006495957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029497346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9273692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027151622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014016112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32155678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141166926","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12654","title":"Hermann Cohen on the role of history in critical philosophy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Teleology; Critical philosophy; Context (archaeology); History and philosophy of science; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of computer science; Philosophy of history; Transcendental number; Philosophy; Sociology; Western philosophy; History","score_opus":0.09585797677770702,"score_gpt":0.26604326944863294,"score_spread":0.17018529267092591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141166926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02362835,0.0051276768,0.0000033207393,0.026035603,0.0019656955,0.000067619134,0.00002962129,0.000016452932,0.94312567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902976,0.00006602869,0.000037973678,0.0039474727,0.005254017,8.5479553e-7,0.0000035933904,0.00004899867,0.00034345692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972732,0.00092530926,0.0008347194,0.0001996801,0.0005360174,0.00023104322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982906,0.00033062426,0.0003623265,0.00037372878,0.0005200639,0.00012264987],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010998178,0.00020957021,0.00039260904,0.0002037351,0.00013632624,0.000054211763,0.00051221036,0.000036342724,0.0012480151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003859127,0.00015668849,0.00034092815,0.000053787822,0.00080292934,0.00022907904,0.000092475406,0.00083747687,0.00016934396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117012554,0.00034870187,0.00002417855,0.000054483316,0.000071080176,0.00060825713,0.015404333,0.000007888786,0.00084155996,0.9790991,0.0031257481,0.00029764592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006938264,0.0004604683,0.00016770941,0.0005058382,0.00006268701,0.000066706634,0.0009613629,0.000008829214,0.0005335348,0.6262031,0.37010005,0.0002358681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000068309587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000058296937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96666926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008922693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012225122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191321340","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00453.x","title":"Reasonable Trust","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Action (physics); Perspective (graphical); Norm (philosophy); Individualism; Epistemology; Rational agent; Social psychology; Disposition; Law and economics; Psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.20513799963846407,"score_gpt":0.25879431059893565,"score_spread":0.053656310960471576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191321340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36423802,0.00007433383,0.00015679785,0.0019074602,0.00078843615,0.000032408912,0.0000026365624,0.00001868109,0.6327812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955299,0.000040805302,0.0010662295,0.0022355765,0.0006054747,1.4290472e-7,1.3978264e-7,0.000015842113,0.00050587405],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889106,0.00029057846,0.00030267087,0.00013615063,0.00022853815,0.000150998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942017,0.000023159526,0.00024001722,0.0001332796,0.000046120404,0.00013724015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046670545,0.00009238778,0.000120976474,0.000093888804,0.00007452336,0.000010739096,0.00041141603,0.000011939022,0.00052366493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010931025,0.000070759066,0.00011189355,0.00010271939,0.00011599639,0.00018500481,0.00004476177,0.00020895476,0.00074891327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003086104,0.0043525756,0.006107133,0.000081678474,0.00016232881,0.027385386,0.0049305665,0.000049106136,0.4577038,0.34765723,0.09958328,0.048900798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076897875,0.007434731,0.17208572,0.00052090327,0.00013133143,0.011890654,0.00013574527,0.000032509324,0.20371737,0.38212726,0.21300901,0.0012249763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.754609e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.532908e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63227534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012119054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012091411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9626015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198288919","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12712","title":"Perception and self‐awareness in <scp>Merleau‐Ponty</scp> and Martin","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Arts Foundation; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Cognition; Social psychology; Space (punctuation); Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.030883366922830908,"score_gpt":0.27548553401227344,"score_spread":0.24460216708944252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198288919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8912223,0.0025564758,0.000060104725,0.0019412842,0.000641494,0.00005566557,0.0000037249981,0.000020460071,0.10349848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749625,0.00025560395,0.00041679858,0.00061809976,0.000974798,9.812619e-7,0.0000038385474,0.00003539521,0.00019822629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777097,0.0009939716,0.0005417675,0.00029128528,0.00014381568,0.0002582022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991198,0.00011310694,0.00027328488,0.00020967808,0.00011433278,0.0001697731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007870964,0.00018320607,0.00032757234,0.00023180018,0.00010821622,0.000041245552,0.00016753486,0.00006483001,0.00010846081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112826965,0.00017754517,0.000079832294,0.00019203393,0.00015122967,0.00019099867,0.00011458408,0.00048303022,0.00011914093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016653759,0.008613851,0.39633122,0.00081659533,0.0030885197,0.060219306,0.14660822,0.00011982092,0.047136627,0.24468724,0.017630473,0.07308275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066432552,0.0015533463,0.84355295,0.0002607563,0.00020696943,0.0044822185,0.0040513994,0.000023338924,0.000092600145,0.11549576,0.023324987,0.00031241513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000027777562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015172824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44722173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023819068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028989489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7240082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206376754","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12690","title":"Introspective acquaintance: An integration account","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Austrian Science Fund; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Syracuse University","keywords":"Introspection; Extant taxon; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Neglect; Relation (database); Cognitive science; Empirical research; Consciousness; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030952917568924303,"score_gpt":0.30546648430090456,"score_spread":0.27451356673198024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206376754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10543362,0.00047759965,0.012060488,0.005116321,0.002028517,0.000058623675,0.000009362143,0.000030404548,0.87478507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513644,0.000014105842,0.0010210692,0.0012199837,0.0024960707,5.369458e-7,0.0000024915669,0.000020711832,0.00008861183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978848,0.00090656796,0.00044869553,0.00024168321,0.00031122085,0.00020703262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987044,0.000074396004,0.00029894416,0.0003133379,0.00039392148,0.00021502168],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011733152,0.00013626099,0.00020665712,0.00008732838,0.00009804565,0.0000683843,0.00043975812,0.00002907513,0.0013886227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021680421,0.00010799571,0.00013670734,0.00032294326,0.00022425983,0.0003854737,0.000054472635,0.0004322044,0.00039055702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015242897,0.00027376102,0.00006005986,0.0000021634696,0.000040724695,0.0013147057,0.0017431672,0.000005827767,0.0051147654,0.98004,0.00026115324,0.010991245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009802737,0.0010579496,0.012519576,0.00008571052,0.000035066245,0.0008163841,0.0005531686,0.000016957927,0.0024319738,0.9789045,0.0023846517,0.00021381173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.621866e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.3326966e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8897028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055241686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004097363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205096217","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12756","title":"<scp>Self‐deception</scp>and moral interests","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"False accusation; Deception; Prima facie; Argument (complex analysis); Self-deception; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Reductio ad absurdum; Psychology; Social psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.06904985213337132,"score_gpt":0.30497881238606156,"score_spread":0.23592896025269022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205096217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28429163,0.0006115387,0.00007649097,0.021022122,0.0013184235,0.00009754929,0.000013701698,0.00006359274,0.69250494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994771,0.00009387732,0.0003221929,0.0019018644,0.0025726897,7.13589e-7,9.772393e-7,0.000022939814,0.0003137188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661505,0.0018372,0.0004171136,0.00014555034,0.00067703595,0.00030803052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987564,0.00032465125,0.0002750317,0.00012685695,0.00013785074,0.00037917116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029014817,0.000117773554,0.00019085307,0.00016104564,0.0009377589,0.00008395478,0.00052851805,0.000025643418,0.00013978282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071101845,0.000114715025,0.0001460144,0.0002174526,0.0004081839,0.0002825665,0.00023096967,0.0009023534,0.00007247898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002084939,0.0001970036,0.0008447941,0.00001647557,0.000062197396,0.0004405469,0.020700462,0.00002955438,0.00006748176,0.96964186,0.007042836,0.0009359458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067766913,0.00066062785,0.0033242889,0.000038491165,0.000048314676,0.000116780175,0.002191586,0.000008452773,0.000013602783,0.63707995,0.3557407,0.00009950299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010513409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017710811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7104794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010012635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012252084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7212578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207063734","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12763","title":"Imputability, answerability, and the epistemic condition on moral and legal culpability","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Ignorance; Culpability; Morality; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03230808794465524,"score_gpt":0.24264939604514754,"score_spread":0.21034130810049229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207063734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96996176,0.00016365887,0.000020117523,0.017111203,0.0003821379,0.00018607875,0.00003340987,0.000016117066,0.012125528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998211,0.000027559508,0.000023847975,0.0013963666,0.00028521533,0.0000018648982,6.3393696e-7,0.000015242218,0.00003825537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995958,0.0027149976,0.00047160682,0.000283121,0.00041957264,0.00015273987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891514,0.00039212988,0.00029171273,0.000250916,0.000041730138,0.00010837819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025787584,0.00013828767,0.00022456037,0.00007114171,0.00047591733,0.00007402008,0.00034089756,0.000009001359,0.00007828117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052278873,0.0000900063,0.00011804666,0.00015028816,0.0007607242,0.00021704171,0.0002996907,0.0005738808,0.0000064954456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052517117,0.001662617,0.015573599,0.00027061655,0.00006710979,0.0022901285,0.003783359,0.0011047652,0.06661971,0.88001287,0.0014392508,0.021924265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012490893,0.0064603435,0.10352408,0.00010136002,0.000120338,0.0072069247,0.00032448972,0.0009696047,0.0046616257,0.8525623,0.010830615,0.00074739056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000034191655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.864991e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087950476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004459665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025409685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36703503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221007854","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12761","title":"Kant's Schematism of the categories: An interpretation and defence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendental number; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Intuition; Object (grammar); Interpretation (philosophy); Schema (genetic algorithms); Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03475153966960281,"score_gpt":0.22425925588408235,"score_spread":0.18950771621447954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221007854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7404263,0.001132046,0.0002186448,0.0104785655,0.0014100774,0.0001353211,0.00004907644,0.000017413737,0.24613254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877214,0.0000134117645,0.000040663042,0.00064606365,0.00047386455,5.4809834e-7,8.2792184e-7,0.000015382933,0.000037081547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986151,0.0005901097,0.00035843052,0.00007904462,0.0002855986,0.00007173061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991575,0.00007793865,0.00042598625,0.00014977454,0.00013564188,0.000053161373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011290321,0.0000780573,0.00013863528,0.00006838595,0.00033251077,0.00004473065,0.0003584826,0.00000648538,0.000254575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084493724,0.000052367224,0.00008425609,0.000038736845,0.00039276973,0.00020869842,0.00016158438,0.00043451323,0.0000026270213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052853444,0.00005549116,0.000013131537,0.000024102415,0.000026265601,0.00001589628,0.024805477,0.00003271769,0.00032630668,0.9737862,0.000029831537,0.00083177735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027811632,0.0005134934,0.00015330526,0.00006605553,0.000030459358,0.000057634552,0.0013512033,0.00007544785,0.00008591854,0.99198204,0.0053266203,0.00007972906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000028991967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014608341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25834584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011586985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029859499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27874175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307280496","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12829","title":"Moral friends? The idea of the moral relationship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Morality; Virtue; Normative; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Criticism; Appeal; Social psychology; Moral psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral disengagement; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10292313285930213,"score_gpt":0.2391083625052267,"score_spread":0.13618522964592458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307280496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12165258,0.000668775,0.000011826436,0.063395634,0.0020202778,0.00012502533,0.00007456867,0.000015533438,0.8120358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961186,0.000004260819,0.000012595877,0.0016158235,0.0018482988,0.0000010318632,0.000001251844,0.000026450083,0.00037170463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735385,0.0013298695,0.0005348156,0.00009113382,0.00055916765,0.00013116107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985996,0.00025259194,0.0006104553,0.00031382986,0.0001679599,0.00005559244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022145784,0.00011130534,0.0001666106,0.00008048931,0.0009612879,0.000055795284,0.0008859379,0.000009917768,0.00083797984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015268262,0.000060414037,0.0003071599,0.00009502928,0.0006198856,0.00012621826,0.00029213022,0.0011364503,0.00002062983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056697674,0.00006455296,0.0002464045,0.0000072033367,0.00004640003,0.00002833118,0.0067010457,0.0002119708,0.00001830831,0.9918465,0.00065211265,0.00012048809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033215142,0.00024256935,0.0017647932,0.000026307782,0.000051627023,0.000041734733,0.0005722502,0.000015831974,0.0000110963265,0.9591009,0.037761822,0.000078899735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000036308493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014268298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.874466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023414768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054467448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9175291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365457516","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12855","title":"R. MatthewShockey, The bounds of self: An essay on Heidegger's Being and Time. New York, NY: Routledge. 2021. p. 224. £130 (hbk.)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Citation; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Art history; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.043118232389348456,"score_gpt":0.27880300765158644,"score_spread":0.235684775262238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365457516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40145716,0.0015245022,0.000052269017,0.015215548,0.0020897943,0.00024655927,0.000022819844,0.00011412715,0.5792772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928559,0.00006501665,0.00014099202,0.00097493094,0.0037960748,0.0000013840688,0.000009445442,0.00009269333,0.002063538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666965,0.0013283243,0.0008559365,0.00036493657,0.00035416172,0.00042698302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801326,0.00024421705,0.0006846039,0.0006504091,0.00011153194,0.00029599492],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018859054,0.00032198758,0.00052498723,0.00036937094,0.00027495433,0.000072092815,0.00085674017,0.00008705068,0.0006921312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006261977,0.00023685822,0.00024122265,0.0004604129,0.00029398288,0.00021161552,0.00017633032,0.0007519669,0.0021314833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055162455,0.0028808508,0.0036295531,0.00019561051,0.005573994,0.0053969794,0.0667583,0.00043429853,0.007603578,0.65554166,0.1978372,0.048631746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008181131,0.009913054,0.038436957,0.0006288895,0.0008317118,0.0010284452,0.0013497412,0.00010126973,0.00035709943,0.84257984,0.0952899,0.001301982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006339724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.7338938e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5913988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034897297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379232482","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12875","title":"Transformative grief","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transformative learning; Grief; Identity (music); Revelation; Psychology; Structuring; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Law","score_opus":0.0637594121649091,"score_gpt":0.33376722707677436,"score_spread":0.27000781491186526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379232482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24931058,0.0002500836,0.00033690274,0.0054546283,0.0026062834,0.00015564096,0.000027779819,0.00007225786,0.7417858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961607,0.00008612267,0.000089263114,0.0011294344,0.0011414618,9.746662e-7,0.000007076822,0.00003582607,0.001349136],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832815,0.00047500426,0.00055407226,0.00011497577,0.00024617958,0.00028160564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922013,0.00004635483,0.00028915197,0.00015947879,0.0000699079,0.00021495997],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011338432,0.00012735157,0.00019587723,0.00023188845,0.00009663022,0.000015055659,0.0002639532,0.000018559236,0.0004989441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011213695,0.00010357096,0.00015348924,0.00028731197,0.00006116894,0.00014212553,0.000023739052,0.00030796096,0.0033154646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020621365,0.0017139276,0.0027369151,0.00057240453,0.0012316216,0.010200087,0.12693007,0.000040756102,0.0034531504,0.26866803,0.4616184,0.12077251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01972888,0.0126289725,0.19513227,0.0012391629,0.00027639093,0.0018849309,0.013349926,0.000015481715,0.0016886981,0.08711938,0.6656281,0.0013078254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000019819752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.0738934e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74685013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003139072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023130846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99746054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380052543","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12860","title":"Is (self‐)reflection a form of intentionality? Sartre's dilemma","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intentionality; Consciousness; Dilemma; Epistemology; Reflection (computer programming); Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09403184443994152,"score_gpt":0.35251957011891033,"score_spread":0.2584877256789688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380052543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2987101,0.00012537478,0.00037773873,0.05405834,0.0022750131,0.0002552957,0.000060396615,0.00022830561,0.64390945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957344,0.00006573644,0.00034912484,0.0006622732,0.0027641251,8.229277e-7,0.0000034647883,0.000034291388,0.00038577887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968946,0.0007841781,0.0008231211,0.00017915695,0.00093684444,0.0003820821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981305,0.00015001354,0.00052891584,0.00020375573,0.0006515134,0.00033528556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025947636,0.00015117417,0.00029793126,0.00045851007,0.00026841467,0.000054592685,0.00051759783,0.00004403719,0.00030703042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006825084,0.00013994882,0.00040352027,0.0008928122,0.00033041285,0.00050980673,0.00010163555,0.0003243895,0.0005893568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016781592,0.00048663415,0.0021661937,0.00012199631,0.00035401378,0.00037152972,0.024034642,0.000014057646,0.0013064902,0.9402861,0.027041672,0.0036488783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094353425,0.00068052625,0.008102706,0.00023563608,0.000087620734,0.00002846232,0.000535517,0.000017658322,0.00046836204,0.83650225,0.15212896,0.00026876733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027636777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004660417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6970243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011630676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014200808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7575186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387543248","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12900","title":"Sex, truth, and law: Rereading Foucault's <i>History of Sexuality</i> after volume 4, <i>The Confessions of the Flesh</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Virginity test; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; History; Gender studies; Art","score_opus":0.048976051095956964,"score_gpt":0.2911096724791419,"score_spread":0.24213362138318492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387543248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1455222,0.001950615,0.000041229643,0.030502303,0.005208539,0.00023276568,0.000037129073,0.000044108507,0.8164611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99314874,0.00023462782,0.000049685288,0.0010702207,0.0008652037,6.665293e-7,5.267543e-7,0.000024312054,0.004606031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966525,0.0017553425,0.00059575884,0.00013407037,0.00063864916,0.00022367411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822617,0.00046980684,0.0006357047,0.00027466056,0.00025835383,0.00013532712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004114213,0.00012280192,0.00027483125,0.000076872464,0.0003040654,0.000025991612,0.0005672676,0.000052649877,0.00005608231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005617971,0.00007726201,0.00018426213,0.00025225742,0.0016173351,0.0001811932,0.00014538465,0.000520757,0.000019164061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032192835,0.0002973466,0.006480442,0.0003254747,0.0002934259,0.0002477765,0.37009528,0.000049391394,0.0031183944,0.5135508,0.101700984,0.0035187472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007415208,0.00021205786,0.0034922839,0.0005094452,0.00012450296,0.000027246226,0.008281469,0.000012728277,0.00013481022,0.035467044,0.95076334,0.00023351962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000071514165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054532637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8490624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058870413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002589113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5959139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390408580","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12926","title":"Joint action and spontaneity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Joint (building); Action (physics); Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Engineering; Architectural engineering","score_opus":0.14509055822425854,"score_gpt":0.2779063298130162,"score_spread":0.13281577158875768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390408580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633532,0.000046588295,0.000058673948,0.0030606182,0.000643633,0.00003278143,0.0000032340404,0.00004416194,0.03275711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841475,0.00020088546,0.000053696105,0.00035942672,0.00073229603,8.6307494e-8,1.8271548e-7,0.000014873912,0.00022379977],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990552,0.00027142145,0.00024143727,0.00011486814,0.00020134382,0.00011573068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995672,0.000040731768,0.00017279039,0.00009217162,0.000026277305,0.000100819954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000517509,0.00007364598,0.000102911086,0.00014411165,0.00009281307,0.00003152627,0.00013489863,0.000008133072,0.000037573223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026155604,0.000056911307,0.00006376851,0.0002214612,0.00005962993,0.00020137851,0.000058589485,0.00018355617,0.0003015526],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007883648,0.0000602779,0.00023662571,0.000034189077,0.000008128045,0.0052199345,0.00039441022,0.000048492402,0.9630545,0.004984207,0.0046789777,0.021201443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005298615,0.0038726262,0.32622945,0.00066167646,0.00011087398,0.011785198,0.00023971483,0.00077852333,0.36465254,0.119232714,0.16588949,0.0012485918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.05419e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.03231784e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59840196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000942791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009302015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38759488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401820805","doi":"10.1111/ejop.13004","title":"Introspection: First‐person access in science and agency: By MajaSpener Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024. ISBN: 9780198867449","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Introspection; Agency (philosophy); Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.02123062507732415,"score_gpt":0.2688577951135518,"score_spread":0.24762717003622764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401820805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3075791,0.00958601,0.0008121914,0.020626979,0.0058809463,0.0003823765,0.00007725318,0.00010422005,0.6549509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959297,0.0008048494,0.000126156,0.00023285976,0.00072123035,5.0359193e-7,0.0000021967296,0.000050557755,0.0021319408],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791133,0.00031041048,0.00038581752,0.0005192854,0.00047504817,0.00039810562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990067,0.00007064679,0.00025314174,0.00028283123,0.00016358879,0.0002231238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009209053,0.00025095628,0.00029213677,0.00062088267,0.00021743042,0.00028487356,0.0009806853,0.00004511716,0.0008176445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071833594,0.00023783736,0.00011555877,0.0011380926,0.00053532695,0.0011772347,0.00022939157,0.0007254736,0.00003124805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025195903,0.0017907743,0.05672125,0.0006502981,0.0011512752,0.026587637,0.026914628,0.0006023149,0.0030513536,0.26006678,0.5380724,0.081871726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003979601,0.0013098189,0.15000984,0.00062398025,0.00016713444,0.00075564306,0.0009858261,0.00033839903,0.00018360384,0.008483414,0.8322921,0.00087067025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002589824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000060300918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6883506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023805142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009874147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9698726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402402283","doi":"10.1111/ejop.13003","title":"Replies to Nicholas Walker, Taylor Carman, and Peter Gordon","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.035553461869898974,"score_gpt":0.2972584323863955,"score_spread":0.2617049705164965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402402283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23575091,0.011078154,0.00038944377,0.015217281,0.005615993,0.00017099889,0.000020639676,0.00010886983,0.73164773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99296665,0.000053282904,0.0003585128,0.0019770418,0.0033255839,0.0000016284871,0.0000020268894,0.00006808779,0.0012471675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818975,0.00042389025,0.0005693263,0.00034443682,0.00018735252,0.0002852245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909586,0.00007944041,0.00014564769,0.00033103843,0.00008516494,0.00026285247],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009003383,0.00021941695,0.0002960453,0.00038902822,0.00010016614,0.000096671734,0.00035865183,0.000045137367,0.0003934832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045806464,0.00018331238,0.0001678799,0.00021620453,0.00014047655,0.0002132042,0.00014018305,0.0005985509,0.002063917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003937977,0.00089554,0.0013162018,0.00048560405,0.0041073253,0.029826235,0.03802417,0.00006151916,0.018795481,0.5892965,0.18626706,0.12698638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021346614,0.0043328023,0.0112110665,0.0004593461,0.00039860382,0.0037381842,0.00028164877,0.000009245687,0.0002560844,0.14937906,0.8269722,0.00082712586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000013875407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.787253e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75721574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027220824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000137536845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406464802","doi":"10.1111/ejop.13038","title":"Metaphor and Metaphilosophy: Wittgenstein, <scp>MacDonald</scp>, and Conceptual Metaphor Theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Metaphilosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Western philosophy","score_opus":0.024710496671686632,"score_gpt":0.2690993401205313,"score_spread":0.2443888434488447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406464802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5584567,0.05761286,0.0016215799,0.0014326625,0.0017440545,0.00035656543,0.00004827419,0.000076650074,0.37865067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920304,0.00035521414,0.0009584058,0.003056746,0.0011119643,0.000005578104,0.0000084310395,0.00007348854,0.00239979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953414,0.0023315754,0.0009885152,0.000515035,0.00040588755,0.00041757597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751496,0.00075156015,0.00065118645,0.0004218039,0.00034086028,0.00031960633],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028098058,0.00044875868,0.0007939115,0.0006652964,0.00024128698,0.00011333952,0.0004437157,0.00009436688,0.00025935078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047104538,0.00035744687,0.0003549168,0.0004528297,0.00078916305,0.00030767327,0.00016997675,0.00070392556,0.00011498191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007117439,0.00053010695,0.00080104376,0.0001249413,0.0056177084,0.0022124848,0.01229676,0.0000025254315,0.009240633,0.92429316,0.010056587,0.0341123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014047927,0.003234307,0.027668234,0.0005747571,0.0063562016,0.0022476802,0.015679972,0.000009630213,0.0056747627,0.79612064,0.12753691,0.0008489661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000038526046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.1454406e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4335737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022626224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053033258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408574690","doi":"10.1111/ejop.13057","title":"Parmenides and Dr. Strangelove, Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying about Monism and Accept the World of Relations, at least for the sake of the Good","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.07473006558338527,"score_gpt":0.2790832779192636,"score_spread":0.2043532123358783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408574690","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29375243,0.009839608,0.00024252721,0.5343477,0.001535713,0.0013158685,0.00030858902,0.000022646787,0.1586349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875245,0.00012062728,0.000070086266,0.0011464263,0.000752104,0.000002467068,7.329834e-7,0.000017049644,0.010366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987939,0.00028425764,0.00043308365,0.000121176716,0.0002083031,0.00015927794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998624,0.0006656328,0.0002929897,0.00020512198,0.00013884415,0.00007338016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005519026,0.00014059288,0.00023819046,0.000077994366,0.000491552,0.00010234566,0.00035356008,0.000014945383,0.00012588737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017846099,0.000061191095,0.00016774278,0.000099009856,0.000496615,0.00010307558,0.0001653997,0.0002615126,0.0000019663999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005770644,0.00010013726,0.0006883241,0.000114512084,0.00028256892,0.000004467421,0.004748061,0.0000375908,0.00022204529,0.9815005,0.004819973,0.006904775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019289041,0.00056062784,0.020430883,0.00089481997,0.00046907042,0.000020545256,0.001707883,0.000043328117,0.00047551407,0.11867776,0.854568,0.0002226834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021834403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020157258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8628227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001480784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022649261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37806702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414677775","doi":"10.1111/ejop.70028","title":"The Quality of Thought. By DavidPittOxford: Oxford University Press, 2024. 238pp. <scp>ISBN</scp> : 9780198789901","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.027095152270274144,"score_gpt":0.290117995315331,"score_spread":0.26302284304505685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414677775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03566851,0.0022075505,0.001687025,0.0046549537,0.0016339832,0.00014878222,0.00006933528,0.00002504216,0.9539048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880325,0.00043745685,0.00017493335,0.00042903938,0.00046197503,3.7667738e-7,0.0000020021955,0.000020289475,0.010441403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957843,0.0021501668,0.0008645395,0.00030844042,0.00048225638,0.00041029503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968572,0.0012154428,0.000827943,0.0006141448,0.0002617656,0.00022345659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034731622,0.00022749859,0.00040537983,0.00011006445,0.00032203028,0.0000483311,0.0017466481,0.00006471326,0.0000688607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006189188,0.00016162654,0.00034338716,0.0005589824,0.0009433496,0.0002209086,0.00028841902,0.0006734555,0.000026769381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025846137,0.0002627954,0.00026538028,0.000024641853,0.00018990859,0.00008674585,0.00033065715,0.000005716184,0.00057001633,0.96243304,0.032494623,0.0030780274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014682005,0.00048673636,0.006139843,0.000118057986,0.00009875301,0.000023177092,0.00038014606,0.0000052741557,0.00069164747,0.2367234,0.7537505,0.00011428844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000063454368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.7922185e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.952364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047585323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062454346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6590939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}