{"meta":{"query_hash":"e09a54c4d4cc","filters":{"venue":"European Journal of Political Economy"},"cohort_total":27,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":27,"exported":27,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e09a54c4d4cc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Journal+of+Political+Economy"},"results":[{"id":"W1541431958","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.11.005","title":"Memories of High Inflation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Inflation (cosmology); Hyperinflation; Economics; Price of stability; Economic stability; Monetary economics; Monetary policy; Inflation targeting; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.04530343161640834,"score_gpt":0.2186444330083068,"score_spread":0.17334100139189845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541431958","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22870922,0.024955729,0.0014670223,0.4714077,0.01872089,0.000016451851,0.0010275285,0.00013778146,0.25355765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927316,0.0051917024,0.00016226237,0.036659945,0.008699504,0.000012788972,0.00029867108,0.00008309639,0.021576034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928695,0.00023733046,0.000041051066,0.000081836304,0.00016964221,0.00018316128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529004,0.0014722454,0.001239434,0.0004737305,0.00070726237,0.0008173235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013325098,0.00020955475,0.0002387499,0.0007181071,0.0026828365,0.0039921533,0.0003710813,0.0025074088,0.014107106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01800598,0.00018733153,0.00016626772,0.0006398259,0.0029234164,0.0039723436,0.002478882,0.0056832037,0.002589027],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009650652,0.00009153134,0.051619563,0.00029417223,0.00023156495,0.0062975804,0.07402722,0.00025891105,0.0014085976,0.14215948,0.6123848,0.11026158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051489464,0.00011109746,0.048447,0.0004408349,0.00006568297,0.0051989504,0.04603356,0.00023030776,0.00056080375,0.0734886,0.82527184,0.00009991331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001493995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025814332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014107106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096442905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052299694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04719299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023930754","doi":"10.1016/s0176-2680(00)00010-0","title":"Oskar Morgenstern on apparent price rigidity in the 1930s: a comment on Kovenock and Widdows","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Rigidity (electromagnetism); oskar; Keynesian economics; Politics; Financial economics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.034614340713322755,"score_gpt":0.21818903090029484,"score_spread":0.1835746901869721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023930754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017044708,0.013151644,0.00024867433,0.969711,0.008050371,0.000005340601,0.00014968071,0.000011580627,0.006967338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042869925,0.020321054,0.00031051307,0.8759265,0.051596995,0.00004308807,0.00006896047,0.00011788405,0.008745141],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957681,0.00079258095,0.00045362473,0.0013016505,0.0011212286,0.0005629113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96518064,0.028009957,0.0019457104,0.0009354564,0.0032158557,0.00071233435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009522233,0.00086387567,0.0019027104,0.0023248473,0.0045692967,0.00539961,0.0035507542,0.036579296,0.0067505282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042456944,0.00077971484,0.0012127536,0.003422338,0.011301856,0.017711286,0.004515343,0.032090966,0.0033255857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016953936,0.000027495538,0.0007584167,0.00019935206,0.00003875134,0.0005048985,0.0032858194,0.00018414926,0.00015804206,0.19568634,0.78885406,0.010133051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009675491,0.000026404014,0.0025178194,0.0010332721,0.000054597756,0.00023901006,0.0022545548,0.00021743256,0.000652313,0.12074167,0.8719907,0.00017551324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027917445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021882655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036579296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005898149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041735526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055509865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027475753","doi":"10.1016/s0176-2680(99)00056-7","title":"The European Union as a country portfolio","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Portfolio; Diversification (marketing strategy); European union; Volatility (finance); Economics; Modern portfolio theory; European monetary union; Financial economics; International economics; Monetary economics; Business; Monetary policy","score_opus":0.013344791070956746,"score_gpt":0.213562691147183,"score_spread":0.20021790007622625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027475753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7525078,0.0118193785,0.012503819,0.013434265,0.0005343391,0.000045514756,0.001252567,0.00012894782,0.20777324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98011357,0.0035293673,0.0013423028,0.00030796885,0.00008677512,0.000011811565,0.0002713928,0.000016397029,0.0143203875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996111,0.00018125006,0.000021492868,0.000061001636,0.00006468256,0.000060492064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931765,0.00011728394,0.00015536294,0.00005800812,0.00015306911,0.00019867472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000807497,0.0002311507,0.0003828229,0.0011953082,0.0006141824,0.0052332464,0.00031285465,0.0012523255,0.0061809104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037764534,0.00016271872,0.00017882307,0.0028306555,0.0003734526,0.0051294393,0.0011347709,0.00062235806,0.0005567831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003058102,0.00025230387,0.044959646,0.0000797079,0.00026264595,0.0005384757,0.00047139812,0.032107074,0.00064678397,0.7652398,0.026697138,0.12843929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096414005,0.00017053785,0.040655527,0.00021857039,0.00026866858,0.00055522524,0.0018394779,0.052904032,0.00046483584,0.7837927,0.11899374,0.000040382944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032028442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031096232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061809104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010200299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009819757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020677209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036055001","doi":"10.1016/s0176-2680(00)00032-x","title":"An application of the ‘insider–outsider’ hypothesis: categorical adjustment assistance programs in France","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Insider; Restructuring; Categorical variable; Unemployment; Economics; Politics; Government (linguistics); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.038085534412579745,"score_gpt":0.2297945709444602,"score_spread":0.19170903653188046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036055001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709409,0.0003481183,0.003161338,0.011895801,0.00006549601,0.00005794999,0.00027540923,0.00003447867,0.013220537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978619,0.00004850054,0.00035100037,0.0003256081,0.00006679595,0.000018379504,0.00004301912,0.0000022316356,0.0012825312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959097,0.0025376796,0.00008613734,0.0003423754,0.00036060662,0.0007635317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98785514,0.008476593,0.0019004712,0.0004187617,0.00071921904,0.0006298654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00422115,0.00021524126,0.00065088755,0.0012664631,0.001579667,0.0020398905,0.001447548,0.002426075,0.0071648974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012277606,0.000117393014,0.00049076707,0.0011915779,0.0018686622,0.0013373876,0.0016715394,0.0010171667,0.00024609038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012043633,0.0015454865,0.42317873,0.00023825902,0.0004957749,0.0017118353,0.007858481,0.014848806,0.0016484828,0.43320632,0.016989103,0.09707438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010412158,0.0015996377,0.7034394,0.00017218519,0.0006528734,0.0005384326,0.026197048,0.08361124,0.0021784573,0.146994,0.03338899,0.00018651529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061117325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060947478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061117325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024699923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025605822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12152314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049087998","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.12.001","title":"A distributional analysis of the benefits of economic freedom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Economic freedom; Economics; Affect (linguistics); State (computer science); Index of Economic Freedom; Demographic economics; Public economics; Sociology; Market economy","score_opus":0.022563633884407082,"score_gpt":0.2570677800422252,"score_spread":0.23450414615781812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049087998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50706345,0.004165532,0.19112529,0.01621925,0.0002908775,0.00009103868,0.0005402358,0.000084091254,0.28042027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932033,0.0003980086,0.0017827143,0.00012587453,0.00015471822,0.000019403338,0.00003112771,0.000017281187,0.004267479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986111,0.00068517606,0.000044291963,0.00012109171,0.0002908906,0.00024739958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990697,0.0066339746,0.0006549156,0.000709566,0.00088082853,0.00042382328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002757574,0.00025687905,0.0005782609,0.0021584856,0.0010218131,0.0024639128,0.0010175718,0.0010884923,0.014335776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01279129,0.00021536421,0.00079897046,0.0016837585,0.0036831866,0.0051394356,0.0025946158,0.0017014658,0.00034028137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037275913,0.000028456468,0.0017591733,0.000032435702,0.000021621408,0.000049725088,0.00010233856,0.008495497,0.00020928677,0.98004913,0.0010376519,0.008177246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014446785,0.000037042995,0.0052257585,0.000031831656,0.000032983226,0.00009965468,0.00040492174,0.026481869,0.00014646599,0.9635432,0.003969509,0.000012410809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00115103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014099933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014335776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017529065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066235295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047957957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049739741","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.02.003","title":"A contest model of liberalizing government procurements","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"CONTEST; Liberalization; Procurement; Economics; Government procurement; Government (linguistics); International economics; Welfare; Point (geometry); Microeconomics; Public economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.12434608332251003,"score_gpt":0.35148386735832865,"score_spread":0.22713778403581864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049739741","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29741025,0.0013054677,0.4354204,0.017346399,0.0005681389,0.00025820703,0.0010606279,0.0005783679,0.24605207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607291,0.0002942363,0.009523348,0.00022764939,0.00013678001,0.00008500943,0.000091640344,0.00004822724,0.028864078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975993,0.0012209717,0.00008184393,0.00024180299,0.00035925474,0.00049683504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938916,0.0038376148,0.00039805222,0.0005193122,0.00063599006,0.00071732985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036386636,0.0007934009,0.0020473765,0.0010518915,0.0014823851,0.005971694,0.003101069,0.0053430507,0.018837487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012641531,0.00082610565,0.0013137633,0.001696005,0.0033656145,0.0051194993,0.001976155,0.0028997879,0.0011244752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012216782,0.000059044898,0.00016514777,0.000055128985,0.000019461975,0.0001253696,0.00011082825,0.0775393,0.00027963507,0.9163406,0.0022927327,0.00289039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012649383,0.000050217022,0.00016284751,0.000015216734,0.000021713828,0.00006055625,0.00010400546,0.29909286,0.00009572317,0.69825774,0.0019807771,0.00003180232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008198186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006086328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018837487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034132705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032355327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06301767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189284389","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.04.001","title":"A dirty deed done dirt cheap: Reporting the blame of a national reform on local politicians","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Deed; Blame; Boycott; Accountability; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Local government; Economics; Political science; Business; Public economics; Political economy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.044201053822997285,"score_gpt":0.24445668812531518,"score_spread":0.2002556343023179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189284389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6151446,0.0015935934,0.0010792237,0.33120015,0.0016171151,0.000057613423,0.004164253,0.00012628459,0.045017038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799498,0.0006216289,0.00044417175,0.0110091,0.0007773668,0.00005171201,0.00096886867,0.000040645504,0.00613682],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99198055,0.00438438,0.0005971936,0.00036390795,0.0014921342,0.0011818621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8707829,0.04868107,0.044765253,0.006545683,0.021511868,0.007713163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012833333,0.000254013,0.00031644868,0.001859462,0.0022789119,0.0040116934,0.001131657,0.0060081077,0.008800209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14140272,0.00030300661,0.00022409992,0.0030383274,0.0016649972,0.004463525,0.002519766,0.0055726594,0.001964883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006230966,0.0002559269,0.24462058,0.00028756887,0.00011046029,0.0006048873,0.016721098,0.00085252564,0.00041070013,0.017935459,0.66996807,0.047609624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022715045,0.0004000464,0.5884667,0.0014788456,0.00031783106,0.0008320538,0.10629889,0.008478951,0.0036214497,0.021567488,0.26795894,0.0003515701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04502249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04963968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04502249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036114345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004576931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08952087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593230902","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.06.001","title":"Fiscal rules to tame the political budget cycle: Evidence from Italian municipalities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Fiscal policy; Politics; Capital (architecture); Subject (documents); Quarter (Canadian coin); Capital expenditure; Macroeconomics; Order (exchange); Government (linguistics); Public economics; Economic policy; Political science; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.032597724775807635,"score_gpt":0.2412767321537682,"score_spread":0.20867900737796055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593230902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96640354,0.0007807771,0.0002151302,0.0036285208,0.000020066178,0.000023092176,0.00045805107,0.000018812609,0.028452095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979373,0.00030424382,0.00004217552,0.00015817021,0.00002515535,0.0000069993916,0.00017080648,0.000009784444,0.0013454471],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789304,0.0008339548,0.000113150505,0.00013084295,0.00028713356,0.0007419385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97150654,0.015178369,0.008019802,0.0021225056,0.0015519424,0.0016209617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004061032,0.00024069105,0.0006557373,0.0010015663,0.0015458482,0.0033818975,0.0007412801,0.0011985839,0.008138958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038105596,0.0002979434,0.0004576456,0.0028951946,0.0022971,0.0011194055,0.0015495436,0.0012890067,0.000974826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036201472,0.0011703483,0.8506079,0.00058060314,0.000642906,0.0016508665,0.016077368,0.009113157,0.00072574394,0.047341846,0.021353472,0.04711571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070606085,0.00043932436,0.91983134,0.00034050865,0.00071974844,0.00020448491,0.022645012,0.003888406,0.0005711539,0.013146985,0.037446033,0.000060925624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1954147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21603131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1954147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038531993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004414722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38855457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902625657","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.01.003","title":"Quantity-cum-quality contests","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Quality (philosophy); Production (economics); Unit (ring theory); Microeconomics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Dual (grammatical number); Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06421628092183877,"score_gpt":0.37368798849403423,"score_spread":0.30947170757219544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902625657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8179656,0.00073859084,0.06204863,0.0057809213,0.00030255504,0.00020832336,0.0005573225,0.00023443966,0.112163655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994589,0.000055835975,0.0013868506,0.0001268343,0.0000889362,0.000023559971,0.000029462186,0.000019425665,0.0036801193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421966,0.0028910502,0.00026283978,0.0006758062,0.0009891329,0.00096146925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93443084,0.050799247,0.0047712396,0.005416623,0.0018223651,0.002759644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011693544,0.0006616773,0.0019907486,0.0009917996,0.0013220286,0.0056561553,0.0014339822,0.0029840628,0.031314287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059599165,0.0005908757,0.0008401789,0.00090271625,0.0033038557,0.0064967643,0.0021388798,0.0026358627,0.00084010174],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008350451,0.00033965227,0.0025392391,0.00012640993,0.0000552351,0.000078676996,0.00044347704,0.007200609,0.0013260571,0.9760448,0.002551259,0.008459571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029902344,0.00022135618,0.0051823123,0.000017561379,0.00004011598,0.00011392202,0.00028520558,0.043231245,0.00036717774,0.9485105,0.0016926716,0.000038849124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016833873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017918199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031314287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019642445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012945678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10475671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909586867","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.01.002","title":"The political economy of contributive pensions in developing countries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Redistribution (election); Tax rate; Indirect tax; Tax reform; Labour economics; Monetary economics; Public economics; Politics","score_opus":0.031495450488158015,"score_gpt":0.24238086684111068,"score_spread":0.21088541635295266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909586867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9484464,0.0011602573,0.0025238325,0.0058692866,0.00003840707,0.000036094178,0.00022316362,0.000027883443,0.041674733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750924,0.000263727,0.000083294704,0.000063551546,0.000020296242,0.00000515256,0.000023788733,0.0000027208644,0.002028183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984675,0.00064698246,0.00007274521,0.00007864882,0.00017764857,0.0005564268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153286,0.0046584513,0.00219353,0.00033002679,0.00075880426,0.0005262797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030161277,0.00018507798,0.0005240983,0.0011590796,0.0018218213,0.0044018407,0.00049223466,0.0017860534,0.006113375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0111411875,0.00033187322,0.0003281538,0.0019025918,0.0021084484,0.0019623982,0.0013478113,0.0015905942,0.00028363257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005403377,0.00029274565,0.057534043,0.00010189058,0.000057728772,0.0006591503,0.0018611703,0.014515205,0.00062916597,0.90017325,0.0037017318,0.019933572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045262626,0.00044700972,0.2308354,0.00034780067,0.00020781715,0.00069530983,0.0078034676,0.058772516,0.0021500955,0.6612519,0.03694665,0.000089351044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012587065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013084644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012587065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038168556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030728036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02769339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121819921","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.02.004","title":"Government risk premiums in the bond market: EMU and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":193,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Bond; Bailout; Government bond; Risk premium; German; Credibility; Position (finance); Economics; Market liquidity; Yield (engineering); Debt; Government debt; Financial system; Financial market; Business; Monetary economics; Finance; Financial crisis; Macroeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.008899728197334702,"score_gpt":0.17769563104108713,"score_spread":0.16879590284375243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121819921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774319,0.001907496,0.00017303175,0.009013522,0.00003970938,0.000016304859,0.002045825,0.00003464534,0.009337434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934895,0.0006696461,0.000064985084,0.00022942366,0.00002266147,0.0000030462063,0.0007544965,0.00001473328,0.0047516134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990061,0.000076510725,0.000036854246,0.00011302518,0.00019867756,0.0005688987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909031,0.0022597075,0.0013900237,0.0002469995,0.0025630102,0.0026372306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017833903,0.00028732597,0.0009735493,0.0014990952,0.0031333922,0.005483543,0.0016565977,0.0025142161,0.0067503145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01172791,0.0003759624,0.00073186425,0.0034216193,0.0014330538,0.0016818285,0.0013962932,0.003018094,0.000346643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014853037,0.0003897098,0.817423,0.00010108485,0.00033059547,0.0011102429,0.003592583,0.01779132,0.00063488854,0.09134163,0.040389158,0.025410498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002231409,0.00008154207,0.9190469,0.00011992518,0.00040263197,0.00021565687,0.009714064,0.038951237,0.00064869865,0.01174566,0.018663308,0.00018713325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99021906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034333102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034333102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029075664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24910527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121892624","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101982","title":"Trade in trash: A political economy approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Politics; Political economy; International trade; Economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08621755112235151,"score_gpt":0.21486960050006487,"score_spread":0.12865204937771335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121892624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088397294,0.0086531555,0.21539858,0.03351414,0.0008567221,0.00015138695,0.00055185356,0.000117860356,0.65235907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9162122,0.0040268623,0.0060005053,0.00094690366,0.00083297445,0.00007666335,0.00008687121,0.000048750087,0.07176824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993362,0.00032247027,0.000017562952,0.0000883411,0.00010471932,0.0001307588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866796,0.00078517146,0.00018282328,0.0001067966,0.00013726302,0.000119992685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097575155,0.0006217625,0.0008556817,0.00269809,0.0018988404,0.0066240686,0.0012517882,0.004205789,0.024029497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021727548,0.00047728186,0.00082567014,0.0033202104,0.005450624,0.0069996216,0.0015526643,0.0029849159,0.00079672725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006693863,0.000022117543,0.00021483054,0.000018225988,0.0000090769945,0.000045411733,0.0000803359,0.0058111474,0.000027423539,0.99053943,0.0011178191,0.0021075143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073937904,0.000013860502,0.00031294115,0.000049806313,0.000012567034,0.000044608296,0.00041160788,0.017178895,0.000037713347,0.97071785,0.011204807,0.000007941007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076561444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009425483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024029497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040949266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021951434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08038664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122851751","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.03.006","title":"Psychologically-based voting with uncertainty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Collège Lionel Groulx; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV","keywords":"Regret; Turnout; Comparative statics; Margin (machine learning); Voting; Economics; Victory; Monotonic function; Ex-ante; Value (mathematics); Contrast (vision); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Law; Statistics; Politics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.08416249220569813,"score_gpt":0.3459078448053319,"score_spread":0.2617453525996337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122851751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.963868,0.0001094088,0.0098831225,0.0017904515,0.00006978936,0.00004403416,0.000076586155,0.000023513525,0.024135128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988933,0.000016918486,0.00043956455,0.000053313837,0.000018889566,0.000008515348,0.000015441523,0.0000030402682,0.00055092224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677247,0.0020761178,0.00010976286,0.00027923673,0.00041888468,0.0003435647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9610995,0.02860084,0.004308768,0.0034843918,0.001403995,0.0011024775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058357213,0.00024500457,0.00051552826,0.0005098332,0.0007679252,0.0035633233,0.00069587707,0.0015426954,0.009002573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04654884,0.00033099955,0.000351044,0.0005264984,0.0020156356,0.001966042,0.0011295656,0.0014393294,0.0004085053],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047747158,0.002532443,0.14167374,0.00034778178,0.00067182555,0.00058238686,0.005235964,0.04696637,0.007925316,0.708822,0.0045946226,0.0758729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003907248,0.0006854792,0.11880664,0.000026472742,0.0001966159,0.00021891855,0.0030326948,0.07245602,0.0015652275,0.80035216,0.002193404,0.00007547707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007085452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007653116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009002573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083413196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045556272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03086263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124184487","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.06.006","title":"Consuming your way to efficiency: Public goods provision through non-distortionary tax lotteries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Impact Fund","keywords":"Lottery; Economics; Ad valorem tax; Microeconomics; Consumption (sociology); Public good; Private good; Revenue; Tax revenue; Public economics; Distortion (music); Consumption tax; Tax reform; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.04886818119543592,"score_gpt":0.32681174474995256,"score_spread":0.27794356355451666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124184487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6785549,0.0005486443,0.24368761,0.005498291,0.00019220081,0.000431386,0.00033597864,0.00030570247,0.07044525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986484,0.00010299822,0.0083888555,0.000085956526,0.000021884502,0.000045418667,0.000017566588,0.000014270944,0.0048391907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845266,0.00089399656,0.000050002553,0.00017556708,0.00023700346,0.00019075353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98758125,0.0076212203,0.001661717,0.0021694887,0.0005118676,0.00045439843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028760526,0.0005736494,0.0009595489,0.0005137087,0.0006742345,0.0031146293,0.0015238198,0.0016088953,0.011355868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01524749,0.0005317701,0.0006852428,0.0005886856,0.0022404513,0.0041362206,0.0015017376,0.0018422779,0.0005726205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020633417,0.0012005176,0.0026833718,0.0002763074,0.00017672022,0.00013369702,0.0004457634,0.05513676,0.0022182749,0.885303,0.003382712,0.0469795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065642054,0.0003898454,0.0029004894,0.000045865694,0.00019191268,0.00012426873,0.00027720947,0.1464628,0.0018251361,0.8442996,0.0027663694,0.00006010475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017231576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014649385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011355868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016950398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018897048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0379892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286611311","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2022.102264","title":"Italy’s demographic trap: Voting for childcare subsidies and fertility outcomes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Voting; Trap (plumbing); Fertility; Economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Demography; Population; Geography; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.027102553967259743,"score_gpt":0.27131014297990774,"score_spread":0.244207589012648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286611311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97752666,0.0008154787,0.00009054913,0.008214687,0.00006639351,0.0000066745065,0.0008368123,0.000009953393,0.012432757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980046,0.00010340646,0.000011989943,0.00020660307,0.00006413016,0.0000028006198,0.00032755962,0.00000362072,0.0012752522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934703,0.00021842089,0.000022835682,0.0000729881,0.00005759502,0.0002811899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684393,0.0007496698,0.0013268833,0.00016789419,0.00012533879,0.0007862415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001385094,0.00012901265,0.00028949574,0.0008245285,0.0005061631,0.0012359138,0.00040417508,0.0011918793,0.011538332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047827335,0.0001270021,0.0004040905,0.000907346,0.0007094753,0.00047981238,0.0011280563,0.0011871256,0.00096027966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036157784,0.00015028083,0.9854005,0.000019073801,0.000059641145,0.00012570595,0.00062822504,0.00016896252,0.00009335874,0.0016924645,0.00420293,0.0070972475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012982581,0.000044186574,0.996637,0.00001372372,0.000021153268,0.00004718994,0.00085075863,0.00014833751,0.000026549962,0.00025409728,0.0019392791,0.000004596555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019287081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028007753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019287081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005687447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005195393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03859955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322505637","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102369","title":"Coherence of output gaps in the euro area: The impact of the COVID-19 shock","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Ariel University","keywords":"Business cycle; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Shock (circulatory); Economics; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Output gap; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Monetary policy; Virology; Statistics; Mathematics; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.1307445179030648,"score_gpt":0.2850863618371124,"score_spread":0.1543418439340476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322505637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99719125,0.00025461835,0.00058810855,0.0003442352,0.000011521108,0.0000065050017,0.0003076478,0.000011726894,0.0012843941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994413,0.000057610177,0.00007660292,0.000031467982,0.00002145592,0.0000028523743,0.00026146616,0.000004625381,0.0001026056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943215,0.00014838132,0.00006692243,0.00015232759,0.000091533984,0.00010870635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99196845,0.0033254626,0.0029673832,0.00052310014,0.00069932034,0.0005161993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002118533,0.00029674085,0.0005231994,0.0011951614,0.00026018245,0.0018031467,0.000272646,0.0006444987,0.002178529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0126172835,0.00014276513,0.00039405518,0.0014580473,0.00061687984,0.0013063225,0.0016705681,0.0012391908,0.00018971579],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014577147,0.00022345805,0.90060097,0.00018923591,0.0006218099,0.00085240544,0.0013828513,0.04135472,0.0058673453,0.012371753,0.0026468677,0.032430775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004974826,0.00024034847,0.9695939,0.000031536092,0.000076542165,0.00011156347,0.00094099826,0.022487853,0.0010768682,0.0037587148,0.0016046009,0.00002745558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003380736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016519434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003380736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044058025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026248448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011204004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378188805","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102404","title":"Gender differences in politician persistence and incumbency advantage","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Persistence (discontinuity); Percentage point; Politics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0828653325422811,"score_gpt":0.3191068952724672,"score_spread":0.23624156273018612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378188805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98966,0.00031811077,0.00016847289,0.00024599495,0.000018188615,0.000012296382,0.0009768244,0.000010594586,0.008589458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776065,0.0000529194,0.00003127242,0.000016478465,0.0000069609378,0.000003293051,0.00036445592,0.0000026018195,0.0017613476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888414,0.000081458056,0.000036340945,0.0001325987,0.0002586279,0.00060689094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686015,0.00094097527,0.00092116214,0.00019848914,0.00027709524,0.0008021183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013319718,0.00014328213,0.00037839505,0.0014434975,0.0009911356,0.001016693,0.0004055398,0.00031508523,0.013884624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005853195,0.00008433755,0.0004803002,0.0014225682,0.0007510812,0.00035399332,0.00065945246,0.0005096588,0.0009813808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022334233,0.000044062337,0.9830331,0.000025384712,0.00006387731,0.00012085561,0.0016895928,0.0001203257,0.0004632388,0.0016322661,0.0013689873,0.011214951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042523498,0.00003789341,0.9960913,0.0000071844715,0.000015075371,0.00005347018,0.001550945,0.000102202204,0.00011305246,0.00019052505,0.0018294904,0.0000045792794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15944476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3132247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15944476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012663467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014887807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31703335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382933085","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102434","title":"Do strong oligopolies reverse Green Paradox effects?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Oligopoly; Economics; Monopoly; Microeconomics; Renewable energy; Fossil fuel; Market power; Perfect competition; Natural resource economics; Cournot competition; Ecology","score_opus":0.083315423591372,"score_gpt":0.26588955681578313,"score_spread":0.18257413322441113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382933085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87903416,0.0013883517,0.033363327,0.010674801,0.00032060643,0.00012579553,0.0005340544,0.00027222233,0.074286655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588203,0.0003801083,0.0011972411,0.00080300623,0.00006375771,0.000021235115,0.000036081383,0.00002301957,0.0015935021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994048,0.00017377427,0.000038419374,0.00012039082,0.00010611724,0.00015651256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987959,0.004748914,0.004275027,0.0014865684,0.00064614613,0.0008843097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017983434,0.00035306174,0.0007497826,0.00061439787,0.00067097176,0.001692139,0.00064687245,0.0012920992,0.014357746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013251635,0.00041495464,0.0006619422,0.0004041298,0.001880191,0.0038920157,0.0012349784,0.0015805704,0.00093754014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010394712,0.00066351186,0.06511711,0.0009057208,0.0005280225,0.0021193665,0.0009485135,0.0260569,0.014527791,0.7847322,0.013675337,0.08968593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032289847,0.00031272165,0.03601676,0.00011638633,0.00019577741,0.0006811377,0.0010419126,0.04911472,0.003635377,0.8980235,0.010445291,0.0000935689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014078652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016560347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014357746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047631474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008751933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04803145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384025518","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102436","title":"Silver lining of the water: The role of government relief assistance in disaster recovery","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre; Attorney-General's Department, Australian Government; Monash University; Deakin University","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Emergency management; Natural resource economics; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.011780501340584244,"score_gpt":0.23947629382712357,"score_spread":0.22769579248653932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384025518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864872,0.0008186946,0.00041689223,0.0062109297,0.000054149135,0.00003558982,0.00087802456,0.000009067776,0.0050895927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851066,0.00023556803,0.0001575961,0.00015995963,0.000017853135,0.000013152783,0.00025543664,0.0000028456607,0.00064696814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735814,0.001620598,0.000080926875,0.00022400143,0.00018887797,0.0005274011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98939884,0.0046996325,0.0033346205,0.00047344458,0.0006485693,0.0014448212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026253974,0.00016576544,0.00029888627,0.000959277,0.00070265605,0.0013489126,0.00072903873,0.00056364445,0.0032693178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0149839055,0.00023120183,0.0004635986,0.0016746122,0.0008955072,0.0011938575,0.0023398253,0.0013649454,0.00022828195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017107799,0.00017597209,0.964634,0.00009698631,0.00021256247,0.00031275366,0.004034933,0.0013857338,0.00009122924,0.0033595355,0.004763815,0.02076141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012639423,0.000071107635,0.9856366,0.00010575867,0.000085576015,0.000060268674,0.006585244,0.0021990594,0.00007671109,0.0012135773,0.0039383047,0.00001516518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08683739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10246841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08683739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012586135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019374654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17266387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386401676","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102460","title":"Do immigrants ever oppose immigration?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Utah State University","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration policy; Demographic economics; Immigration law; Opposition (politics); Unemployment; Political science; Terrorism; Socioeconomic status; Immigration and crime; Development economics; Economic growth; Economics; Sociology; Demography; Law; Population; Politics","score_opus":0.027266396190517482,"score_gpt":0.3060149869885208,"score_spread":0.27874859079800335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386401676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841262,0.000488461,0.00004128193,0.0040997686,0.00011791697,0.00000488182,0.00006404764,0.0000019681497,0.01105547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719405,0.0005562344,0.000024549407,0.00090951874,0.000082407285,0.000004864328,0.000047503072,0.0000019015076,0.0011790544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914265,0.00036147342,0.000048748396,0.00006669334,0.00018513192,0.0001953534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942498,0.0020527306,0.0021737055,0.00017734087,0.0005042017,0.0008421787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019753294,0.0001661346,0.00025034306,0.00068419805,0.0013051294,0.0022902612,0.00027672693,0.0012360904,0.004206348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011382209,0.0002029558,0.0002503872,0.0005706283,0.0012721852,0.0014199323,0.00071907404,0.001643027,0.0004563446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026871375,0.00020014067,0.88200635,0.00016552825,0.0001454138,0.0007173734,0.0706043,0.000093401984,0.000637092,0.0045821765,0.004392922,0.036186606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003565372,0.00023184292,0.69330114,0.000381317,0.00011064939,0.0011409195,0.27771014,0.0003632305,0.0003640538,0.0017856908,0.024510263,0.00006521177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072732884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116782235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072732884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004454052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005656042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014461875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396906760","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102534","title":"On the side effects of fiscal policy: Fiscal rules and income inequality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Slowakische Akademische Informationsagentur; Institut Français; Ministère de l'Europe et des Affaires Étrangères; National Hemophilia Foundation; Ekonomická univerzita v Bratislave","keywords":"Economics; Fiscal policy; Inequality; Debt; Economic inequality; Public economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.01994611242040266,"score_gpt":0.23797730293506847,"score_spread":0.2180311905146658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396906760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.813712,0.015901087,0.0047937217,0.10078135,0.0007386302,0.000028235525,0.0012480663,0.000040259383,0.062756605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928054,0.0026286056,0.00015392771,0.000892779,0.00053223636,0.0000064146884,0.000113170936,0.000012190273,0.0028552788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874556,0.00067969755,0.00004652515,0.00012210736,0.00011099769,0.00029511977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806918,0.015990682,0.0016789036,0.00040640356,0.0005331905,0.0006989973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003690585,0.00044452696,0.0013674266,0.0009028229,0.00089197926,0.003976653,0.0008209148,0.0025933697,0.015943665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013548479,0.00023318676,0.00058945204,0.0013053325,0.0028004437,0.0032167854,0.00205656,0.003917316,0.00062698545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024973922,0.0007153566,0.14466539,0.0004940585,0.0007439283,0.0015095066,0.0017964316,0.03663732,0.0010321349,0.72706175,0.025972623,0.05687406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033766558,0.00026372165,0.09884947,0.00033355108,0.0006838554,0.00019481327,0.003075423,0.036315463,0.00099382,0.8452138,0.013640126,0.0000984246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008653794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009230823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015943665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011739872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001314781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05333692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401072633","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102582","title":"One money, one voice? Evaluating ideological positions of euro area central banks","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Central bank; Economics; Monetary economics; Financial system; Monetary policy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07519035137373578,"score_gpt":0.2747524663509099,"score_spread":0.1995621149771741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401072633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857757,0.00026002974,0.00015099614,0.0009156435,0.00004011154,0.000013153065,0.000058992093,0.0000013393997,0.012784049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947935,0.000060511495,0.00006109076,0.000074522046,0.000022622215,0.000007667728,0.000043020817,0.0000019567337,0.0002492019],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370474,0.003753651,0.00043880273,0.0003039843,0.0010199454,0.00077890727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93717456,0.03567383,0.010658483,0.0010138443,0.010291473,0.0051877075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017558457,0.00032124293,0.00060529663,0.0027444176,0.0017730463,0.007181222,0.0006676542,0.0019883616,0.006779482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05714055,0.00022071347,0.00026017378,0.002173854,0.0023880259,0.003480689,0.0027932036,0.0014874431,0.0007131752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0089936415,0.000918436,0.8637669,0.00023761822,0.00039592801,0.00066989363,0.023700677,0.002982584,0.0010207145,0.037540108,0.0046282983,0.055145223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095736946,0.0012712462,0.75223386,0.000499865,0.00043624121,0.00016586487,0.18808962,0.008752968,0.0013492313,0.035656437,0.010483228,0.000104105966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031544424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042413175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017558457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017853804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012547385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09285909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406923775","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102646","title":"Jumping on the bandwagon and off the Titanic: An experimental study of turnout in two-tier voting","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Labex Ecodec; Osaka University; Providence Health Care","keywords":"Bandwagon effect; Turnout; Voting; Jumping; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.037783391519171164,"score_gpt":0.2775468999002912,"score_spread":0.23976350838112004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406923775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99795425,0.000016980232,0.00044205398,0.00006700036,0.000014015405,0.000028886961,0.000032330146,0.0000058379005,0.0014385326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856937,0.00002348422,0.00057016226,0.000062752166,0.000010177908,0.000051584466,0.000054778007,0.0000056244908,0.0006519529],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985209,0.00085814355,0.00007141388,0.00020714647,0.00016506622,0.00017733019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98722535,0.008684857,0.0017168167,0.0013619751,0.00027536895,0.00073556893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00222976,0.0004040822,0.0006168599,0.00030764626,0.0006140191,0.0010199924,0.0006111259,0.0008185028,0.006427095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010400567,0.00026195918,0.0003338025,0.00031432707,0.0011974307,0.0007320487,0.0008578986,0.0014093878,0.0005805215],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06012207,0.11538432,0.24135076,0.0012517973,0.0016405663,0.0013526292,0.016727537,0.027226806,0.34270072,0.07656275,0.009816247,0.10586388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012266447,0.11678365,0.49107775,0.00022652802,0.00092358317,0.0010451339,0.012557979,0.17492874,0.065307505,0.11069956,0.013713877,0.0004692767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011625704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018828561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006427095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004317963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035630236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021500826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409487635","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102670","title":"Heterogeneity of institutions and model uncertainty in the income inequality nexus","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Economics; Inequality; Economic inequality; Income distribution; Income inequality metrics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0713987261209311,"score_gpt":0.3530671341827761,"score_spread":0.281668408061845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409487635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8157536,0.00072475255,0.1710238,0.0027460314,0.000029980829,0.000062999876,0.00019785989,0.000088233246,0.00937279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967926,0.00012710139,0.0026970631,0.000038581507,0.00001704553,0.000024530867,0.0000381692,0.0000067910637,0.00025810386],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739134,0.0017518095,0.00007960454,0.0002588467,0.00023301548,0.00028526218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779146,0.018050343,0.0021864413,0.0010897107,0.00038583943,0.00037314903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005943066,0.00036078968,0.0010414276,0.0013048582,0.0007416865,0.0023702043,0.0009279488,0.00084500667,0.0013210607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027184172,0.00032875818,0.00078529504,0.0009722859,0.0018680665,0.0023493425,0.0024421609,0.0014051313,0.00009154688],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117131676,0.00013681315,0.061996393,0.00008937343,0.00024623665,0.00027542002,0.00087525556,0.5148119,0.00038467106,0.40589434,0.0006062582,0.014566296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011101011,0.000035068955,0.009420706,0.000034168555,0.00003983851,0.000044484965,0.0002476052,0.72405106,0.00011895646,0.26538816,0.0005838776,0.000024984996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005422292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004158544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005943066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011454549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008647108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031430304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412078620","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2026.102848","title":"Political Accountability with Endogenous Party Formation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Accountability; Politics; Endogeny; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Public administration; Business; Economics; Chemistry; Law; Biochemistry","score_opus":0.08709646965854412,"score_gpt":0.3369947856389981,"score_spread":0.24989831598045398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412078620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5279192,0.0006939044,0.27902788,0.021868072,0.0007218644,0.00016587846,0.0006091353,0.00039769904,0.16859643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809893,0.00013715474,0.0038689552,0.00015299814,0.00020186858,0.00005574495,0.00004259993,0.000031189134,0.014520226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640614,0.0020495632,0.00010804173,0.00040742994,0.0004237741,0.00060490804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755785,0.017492482,0.0028627187,0.00169168,0.0012538194,0.0011209028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053150076,0.0005331455,0.0013684253,0.0008846468,0.0016153097,0.004125126,0.0009234973,0.0022337555,0.015565596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030576466,0.00054810115,0.0006946321,0.0012483038,0.003554483,0.004851649,0.0032586837,0.00270595,0.0007552501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096605036,0.00010551915,0.0011852748,0.000050374685,0.00002301079,0.00010578243,0.00022898502,0.015797284,0.00029031123,0.973542,0.0019480707,0.0066268495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004463014,0.00001754622,0.00059628737,0.000008766866,0.000010653653,0.000023125256,0.00008643935,0.04024912,0.0001779177,0.95781,0.0009675464,0.00000787632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002555182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019399611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015565596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020902208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023340397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052072108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414107675","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102754","title":"Do as I say, not as I do? Economists policymakers and fiscal consolidation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Austerity; Consolidation (business); Fiscal policy; Fiscal union; Stimulus (psychology); Fiscal federalism; Politics","score_opus":0.020228489606158365,"score_gpt":0.25354517172443586,"score_spread":0.2333166821182775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414107675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07357456,0.007976178,0.0015895613,0.86162007,0.002526576,0.000020182788,0.000071684386,0.000030881714,0.052590314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92833513,0.004641584,0.0005004131,0.049412623,0.002220315,0.00002834133,0.000048801507,0.00003754212,0.014775295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934929,0.0030776807,0.0003663494,0.0005252735,0.0009286544,0.0016091896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824287,0.006659824,0.003459369,0.00069989514,0.003229615,0.0035225782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015418044,0.00025999697,0.0007662077,0.001766886,0.0038174703,0.013156594,0.0008117186,0.0061273966,0.008290461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053565282,0.0003242967,0.0003436335,0.0027773622,0.009257025,0.010618593,0.0041934117,0.008833405,0.00165968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017935308,0.00015120396,0.013723685,0.000064709195,0.00006896672,0.00014536372,0.0041405694,0.0008431099,0.00011859105,0.88501513,0.061484996,0.03406435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017645826,0.00005030216,0.011035828,0.0003981584,0.000066449524,0.000115901086,0.013021551,0.0010455818,0.00036632278,0.8722541,0.10141953,0.00004974956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0130395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015572546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015418044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007304338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013437361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08153933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117540174","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102751","title":"Redistributive promises, transfers to special interests, and the political economy of reform with limited state capacity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Economy","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Incentive; State (computer science); Redistribution (election); Politics; Government (linguistics); Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.013575895955764437,"score_gpt":0.24671160935816727,"score_spread":0.23313571340240283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117540174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6041554,0.001908578,0.015202508,0.055751,0.0001534644,0.00013344144,0.0002836139,0.00010325125,0.3223087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941665,0.00019292496,0.0002220881,0.00037316183,0.00010674548,0.000030870757,0.000010395861,0.000006405241,0.004890864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99397117,0.002746128,0.00013270671,0.0004094088,0.0006699978,0.0020705557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97831696,0.014990324,0.0033330168,0.0012097011,0.0008839236,0.0012660763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0098069925,0.0002726665,0.001217201,0.0013117029,0.004077931,0.00798351,0.0014071836,0.0048310445,0.015857302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025742544,0.00046136195,0.0006523389,0.0017892069,0.011268969,0.007983273,0.0047318283,0.004263823,0.0004078252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012539382,0.000061102044,0.0009304599,0.00002282398,0.00001329626,0.00003607893,0.00038316168,0.0024781285,0.00006352687,0.99213624,0.0010906745,0.0026590948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016497678,0.00006859165,0.00301378,0.00003466859,0.00003558233,0.000025937159,0.0009295051,0.005415978,0.00016924897,0.98319757,0.006925064,0.000019087143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072249616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008879376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015857302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008125716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005777271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058956504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}