{"meta":{"query_hash":"f86d518ddf40","filters":{"venue":"European Journal of Political Theory"},"cohort_total":49,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":49,"exported":49,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f86d518ddf40","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Journal+of+Political+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W1976512646","doi":"10.1177/1474885110395478","title":"Rosa Luxemburg on disappointment and the politics of commitment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Disappointment; Socialism; Marxist philosophy; Victory; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Allegiance; Democracy; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Communism; Psychology","score_opus":0.044029502078475204,"score_gpt":0.2915546977926234,"score_spread":0.2475251957141482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976512646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13584161,0.00019754206,0.00061137875,0.0011599462,0.00027139205,0.00010546137,0.000012494175,0.000009621613,0.86179054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690545,0.00004042801,0.00018049544,0.0017777832,0.00037941936,4.879668e-7,1.9840681e-7,0.000010912707,0.0007048135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938527,0.004823428,0.00046718205,0.00008963061,0.00029922207,0.00046784378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739707,0.0017311653,0.00017779073,0.00018375662,0.00010051966,0.00040968496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060786023,0.00010913447,0.0002803474,0.00005203895,0.0002506824,0.0000141571945,0.00036243195,0.000036347752,0.00035239127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015394554,0.00006395216,0.00016785348,0.00004887768,0.004123144,0.000059671765,0.0000827609,0.0003054523,0.000030477553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002823892,0.00013744006,0.00008937577,0.000004720997,0.00006479694,0.000043586235,0.00319169,1.2447303e-7,0.0000012317447,0.99559885,0.00006282568,0.00052298565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010512477,0.00037796245,0.0047264528,0.000042716936,0.0000676514,0.000021265763,0.0046834867,9.473107e-7,0.00026931535,0.98649603,0.0021907098,0.00007218542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022368105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.451681e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8610857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000554062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077359764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978422804","doi":"10.1177/1474885112471273","title":"The shameless truth: Shame and friendship in Aristotle","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Virtue; Friendship; Rhetoric; Moral psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027627970523404124,"score_gpt":0.3015880828776372,"score_spread":0.2739601123542331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978422804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88777226,0.00045838472,0.00022688943,0.0011877909,0.00053337193,0.000057359815,0.000004774746,0.0000075767816,0.1097516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858695,0.000007089579,0.00010254171,0.00029504707,0.00025797263,0.0000014017965,2.5376076e-7,0.00001957012,0.00072914804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790657,0.0011654001,0.00038005426,0.00009879441,0.00010035117,0.00034881826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988053,0.0006426793,0.00008973314,0.00017624366,0.00006314702,0.00022293147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016292592,0.00008708838,0.00013936701,0.000073338844,0.00007133783,0.00004606181,0.0002221129,0.000024248113,0.00087871763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028161684,0.00005268337,0.000064545304,0.00006179896,0.0002836146,0.00007235784,0.000049914346,0.00038380528,0.00034847984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032065676,0.000070441456,0.001338991,0.0000015072005,0.000010320605,0.00014801756,0.00034375404,9.664133e-8,0.000060909668,0.979919,0.0004329695,0.01764193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008761044,0.00033363275,0.7766611,0.000044418994,0.000024793697,0.00039281187,0.0048355637,0.0000022096099,0.00003066544,0.20952655,0.0071453964,0.0001267353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014276556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.496618e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77532214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022063785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001286054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9621342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996424253","doi":"10.1177/1474885108096962","title":"Demanding Recognition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Politics; Sociology; Identity (music); Variety (cybernetics); Identity politics; Epistemology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Aesthetics; Economics","score_opus":0.1394192579295369,"score_gpt":0.3391767026908409,"score_spread":0.19975744476130397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996424253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10381285,0.0000904918,0.0036506455,0.0044102096,0.00044862877,0.000030920484,0.000003770472,0.000028025339,0.8875245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99446356,0.00004733167,0.0005304542,0.0019572722,0.0025487987,1.0268047e-7,3.9540464e-7,0.000012899759,0.00043920416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961132,0.002659422,0.00034466473,0.00007302576,0.00036146116,0.0004482311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981719,0.0009140982,0.00009877979,0.00007338038,0.00018434577,0.0005574701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046339454,0.00007084972,0.00014363657,0.000081550425,0.00043158868,0.00002260648,0.00022740687,0.000038405502,0.00030419935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003983171,0.000060550807,0.00014111456,0.00009366318,0.0010317131,0.00020498427,0.000026761703,0.00043512252,0.00034878848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003138161,0.000037711354,0.0000497472,0.0000034094742,0.000013288081,0.00034081665,0.0020060698,2.2267189e-7,0.00002280283,0.9960197,0.00027466498,0.0012001371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025060432,0.00011731557,0.0015756666,0.00005620409,0.000023080021,0.00016132089,0.0012828213,5.2006806e-7,0.00013008126,0.9811626,0.015140538,0.000099213845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008828298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.091831e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8906507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076840726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001386378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47685158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029071836","doi":"10.1177/1474885106064662","title":"The Rise and Fall of Species-Life","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Metaphor; Bourgeoisie; Civilization; Privilege (computing); Depiction; Politics; Liberalism; Ideology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Reading (process); Literature; Epistemology; Law; Art; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.020197837998878716,"score_gpt":0.20764986672197272,"score_spread":0.187452028723094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029071836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23077263,0.0023690385,0.00013421841,0.0011820105,0.00036440487,0.000029055109,0.0000086140035,0.000007800803,0.76513225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98510045,0.000059328646,0.00004033583,0.0001578016,0.0020477995,8.344351e-8,2.0054507e-7,0.000014571488,0.012579415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868584,0.00047615755,0.00039124148,0.000052768602,0.00017777192,0.0002162299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992453,0.00031026447,0.00013853791,0.00010321367,0.00008298494,0.00011969727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012032293,0.00007963466,0.00014007205,0.00003718856,0.00016840514,0.000091219976,0.00017637962,0.000007255603,0.00023232558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012648957,0.000043030363,0.00009440417,0.000011884862,0.00069387635,0.00008093707,0.000039833787,0.00013795013,0.000030155552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006187674,0.00003708944,0.0000771803,0.000006635771,0.000024995994,0.000028137838,0.00070837105,6.530542e-7,0.00005287825,0.99054617,0.007883378,0.00057265966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004466127,0.00020877385,0.0055185035,0.000036168465,0.00004521043,0.000029394661,0.0035707545,0.000002918405,0.0001370791,0.14466944,0.84524965,0.000085493695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006726347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003604218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8458767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010225853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015891139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25566164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039434524","doi":"10.1177/1474885112471267","title":"Sunlight is the best disinfectant? Étienne de la Boétie on corruption and transparency","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Polity; Friendship; Transparency (behavior); Ideal (ethics); Humanism; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Social science","score_opus":0.019083081644728477,"score_gpt":0.30266938366072543,"score_spread":0.28358630201599694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039434524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5611861,0.00014146685,0.0007961885,0.0039211772,0.00013998164,0.00007544946,0.000006086516,0.0000135309865,0.43372002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516183,0.00010300232,0.00005452098,0.0034696888,0.0005667373,8.654216e-7,1.3863185e-7,0.000013704925,0.00062953314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438876,0.0043859384,0.00032587178,0.00010708211,0.0002628512,0.0005294683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704736,0.0021118962,0.00009372755,0.00013472827,0.000099410834,0.0005128906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004696441,0.000111854286,0.00014915447,0.000050206676,0.00035664678,0.00015511247,0.00033087932,0.00004328661,0.00063795305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017124064,0.00006938465,0.00010942494,0.00008894188,0.0018139123,0.00026878857,0.000024808067,0.00040287577,0.0002257027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003242318,0.00007052847,0.00037149002,0.0000045747033,0.00001379999,0.000029742336,0.002749717,5.605771e-7,0.00020536824,0.99198616,0.00017273024,0.00436292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034457093,0.00047107833,0.026359322,0.00014302354,0.00005288952,0.00007344509,0.0050277403,0.0000053936947,0.00041349488,0.9452194,0.021731084,0.0001585522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041308587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.196308e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43397573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064197506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007324916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69851387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071164016","doi":"10.1177/1474885108089173","title":"Defenders of Liberal Individualism, Republican Virtues and Solidarity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Solidarity; Politics; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Liberalism; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04785867161284176,"score_gpt":0.3039711138310066,"score_spread":0.25611244221816487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071164016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66316706,0.00014609066,0.00055061065,0.0008805026,0.00013552664,0.000039785587,0.00001058752,0.000018708903,0.33505112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701,0.000059741986,0.000530936,0.0013862558,0.0004611698,1.703137e-7,2.8963325e-7,0.000013632632,0.0005378362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99490386,0.0034657607,0.0005558731,0.00012600028,0.0004250424,0.0005234819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978238,0.0008989609,0.00021327575,0.0001492191,0.00020370394,0.000711056],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005430624,0.00011178297,0.0002813312,0.00011756751,0.00029474837,0.000035527006,0.00039902495,0.000043633125,0.00022148434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037316652,0.00009357432,0.00014308277,0.00013493613,0.0035130905,0.00038690254,0.000094672054,0.00035357958,0.000008382911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057277965,0.000060514336,0.0010435861,0.0000068994987,0.000031443185,0.00010585571,0.004091127,3.1249658e-7,0.0001014014,0.9934163,0.00018870036,0.00089655013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005856492,0.00041245497,0.04014724,0.00007625852,0.00004699416,0.00026543599,0.004300187,7.78448e-7,0.0009662848,0.9385622,0.014426472,0.00021003328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019712279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.325371e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33451328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042296397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021356615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080501972","doi":"10.1177/1474885111417777","title":"Friendship and politics in Aristotle’s <i>Nicomachean Ethics</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Politics; Virtue; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Social science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.11921008579805789,"score_gpt":0.26700277128038463,"score_spread":0.14779268548232674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080501972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059247386,0.0003077195,0.00012570094,0.0016682246,0.0003933255,0.00003274445,0.000012413095,0.000016497546,0.938196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558794,0.000010253939,0.00014015408,0.0023843388,0.001508599,1.8500856e-7,5.06022e-7,0.00002831606,0.00033971135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759245,0.001219515,0.000511189,0.000116267925,0.00018508156,0.000375509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987072,0.00059265207,0.00011963924,0.00013962989,0.0000980771,0.000342801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022152332,0.00013618445,0.00023286273,0.00013202919,0.00012127737,0.00005277019,0.00021977625,0.000034506476,0.00055330386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005764532,0.00010442408,0.000107584456,0.000026670017,0.0009143954,0.00014748106,0.00007479371,0.0009909385,0.00006046476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006295804,0.00013560794,0.000071952585,0.000017538563,0.000018429857,0.00029846805,0.011043762,3.1151245e-8,0.000008743238,0.9877916,0.00008222634,0.00046868977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047585205,0.00029870193,0.001538358,0.000092722614,0.00003125179,0.00007524763,0.002033262,0.0000014069644,0.00008108307,0.9493361,0.045901965,0.00013404827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015477694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007851981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93785626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030751115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038891754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60582894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090743857","doi":"10.1177/1474885113519259","title":"On the critique of political imaginaries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dialectic; Ideology; Politics; Instrumentalism; Critical theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Critical thought; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04610750725022586,"score_gpt":0.2807263370313409,"score_spread":0.23461882978111506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090743857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035647165,0.000071855306,0.00076177914,0.02677956,0.0008816359,0.000042350468,0.00002824582,0.00001777109,0.9357696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98573,0.0000022288482,0.00003454599,0.009772885,0.0034762982,2.9248295e-7,7.661877e-7,0.000030027906,0.00095295906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965886,0.002049137,0.0005255149,0.000099977224,0.0003148112,0.0004219533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723136,0.0017832268,0.00014829788,0.0002486618,0.0003400307,0.0002483912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030366932,0.00014290138,0.00026431566,0.000086548775,0.0001960484,0.000113376176,0.00041566993,0.000022284341,0.0008476856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021387604,0.00008565859,0.00024649626,0.000015349593,0.002283992,0.00011579199,0.00006029597,0.0005716503,0.00013851111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086583765,0.00008745431,0.0000024331084,0.000025280635,0.00004127855,0.000033001077,0.0028817875,2.986339e-7,0.000050746192,0.99497247,0.00168648,0.00013216419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025932718,0.00046562,0.00014404455,0.00011540794,0.00004805295,0.000044608023,0.0023690595,0.00000366974,0.0003936901,0.96174955,0.0343047,0.00010224963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014880002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012884522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95008284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021896796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042462216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9281563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092505391","doi":"10.1177/1474885107077311","title":"Struggling over the Meaning of Recognition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Construals; Normative; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Identity (music); Sociology; Subject (documents); Ideal (ethics); Order (exchange); Law; Construal level theory; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08130903967799825,"score_gpt":0.34570405704226786,"score_spread":0.2643950173642696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092505391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20289469,0.00008103825,0.005694647,0.0018699802,0.00042273162,0.000040007486,0.0000050611584,0.000012135046,0.7889797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962554,0.000009962047,0.0004827901,0.0012407566,0.0019300117,3.6006977e-8,2.2882969e-7,0.0000114965105,0.00006930387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659866,0.0019289448,0.0005020887,0.000064233835,0.0004614213,0.00044463642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966171,0.0025499135,0.0001925354,0.00009534098,0.00024142167,0.0003037014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015897663,0.00006828606,0.000135139,0.00006885327,0.000232905,0.000026811744,0.00030837534,0.000038047016,0.00017941145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048321113,0.00004641749,0.00014716598,0.00011877502,0.0009841638,0.00013675152,0.000037250047,0.0005204828,0.000032090127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000507983,0.000027219232,0.0000377147,0.0000057938787,0.000019116522,0.00004030155,0.0032302786,8.4212667e-7,0.00011690626,0.9918979,0.000029585415,0.004543549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019341975,0.000096319425,0.002389925,0.000091948285,0.000038750364,0.000013606122,0.0059730434,0.0000011816975,0.0007110702,0.98720556,0.0032172378,0.00006795744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002013448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003350898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7933607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005502212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009168197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57848376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093657543","doi":"10.1177/1474885107086449","title":"Locke, Waldron and the Moral Status of 'Crooks'","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Democracy; Classical liberalism; Sociology; Politics; Political philosophy; Liberalism; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.029968225875933247,"score_gpt":0.2830809630001785,"score_spread":0.25311273712424526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093657543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18290526,0.0007370821,0.00092032563,0.0016741913,0.00018371762,0.00005019423,0.0000107203505,0.000007177394,0.8135113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965744,0.00017173734,0.0002647819,0.0007910209,0.0004775502,1.03745116e-7,2.1956701e-7,0.000006821544,0.0017133631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970478,0.0018880054,0.0003226885,0.00005573441,0.00029734083,0.00038843896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835116,0.0008950855,0.00015732434,0.00008339416,0.00015897465,0.00035403643],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019115823,0.00006667422,0.00018656113,0.000036918795,0.00027471667,0.000013079533,0.00019016447,0.000014702023,0.00009839799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012188742,0.00004182819,0.000102457685,0.00006112994,0.007388565,0.000075521784,0.000040150695,0.00019035029,0.000011746963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010296263,0.000020325913,0.00070539775,0.000002694876,0.000021423992,0.00006684641,0.0014133969,8.8600314e-7,0.000007083466,0.9969469,0.0002958788,0.00041620605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034365996,0.0005012939,0.027499255,0.00010941762,0.0001622146,0.0006739454,0.011293015,0.0000042814318,0.00018475635,0.2682765,0.6875422,0.00031654062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015660889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024864837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81366915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040941213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006347256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99531275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112317324","doi":"10.1177/1474885106067282","title":"Refiguring the European Union’s Historical Dimension","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Solidarity; Identity (music); Sociology; European integration; Law and economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Political economy; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Politics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02242227356213494,"score_gpt":0.26770628609480795,"score_spread":0.245284012532673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112317324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023490371,0.0004643318,0.0031296252,0.0086847935,0.00074062136,0.00004919889,0.0000027266494,0.000045551486,0.9633928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974661,0.000036046527,0.00016165915,0.0012048779,0.0044784085,9.611726e-8,4.0380345e-7,0.00004075353,0.019416787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98121303,0.016880993,0.0006225011,0.00014812086,0.00057180476,0.0005635206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983043,0.00062990154,0.00034836892,0.0002538189,0.0001668805,0.0002967475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015327804,0.00013943043,0.00017872592,0.00007726582,0.0005614054,0.000086750166,0.0007162956,0.000020117905,0.00009420445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013162636,0.00009316222,0.00020425058,0.00018003913,0.0004605588,0.0001830499,0.00011134528,0.0005040261,0.0002689065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016230066,0.00005747179,0.00011555423,0.0000025563158,0.000009092992,0.0003101792,0.00064844516,0.000008979305,0.00017306056,0.9828386,0.012079392,0.003740481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004004495,0.00010594004,0.057542723,0.00008308425,0.000032950018,0.000078298865,0.0005809325,6.6730627e-7,0.000117379685,0.04473172,0.89615154,0.00017428886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027907148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001606139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9511706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037577088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007368023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53123415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132993813","doi":"10.1177/1474885109355891","title":"Pascalian Ethics? Bergson, Levinas, Derrida","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Enlightenment; Political philosophy; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Expression (computer science); Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03851814058358267,"score_gpt":0.2570371216788515,"score_spread":0.21851898109526885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132993813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104229905,0.00011976536,0.0011772461,0.02957368,0.001389857,0.00004616016,0.000027675187,0.000051570856,0.8633841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988262,0.000006413926,0.00016513336,0.0042596967,0.0052822432,3.045784e-7,0.0000017502599,0.00003688346,0.0019855516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693793,0.0013359862,0.00066386827,0.00016062778,0.0004183828,0.00048320918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976023,0.0009285024,0.00017992184,0.000260621,0.00037101185,0.00065765413],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036486527,0.00019280297,0.00033760452,0.0001283639,0.00028769218,0.00017404043,0.0005327083,0.00005421671,0.009007709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019571353,0.00012728226,0.00042067398,0.000046151603,0.0017864653,0.00016845297,0.00009957965,0.0019353044,0.00070278416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005496724,0.00012245312,0.000015358166,0.000013590856,0.000100949765,0.00020962566,0.0014650904,2.244141e-7,0.00022236297,0.9951368,0.0004183203,0.0022402517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025515526,0.0001788961,0.00021891476,0.000037792335,0.000123683,0.00008132458,0.000496441,0.000005099192,0.00021753123,0.8253452,0.17287722,0.00016273894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000073847846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012039459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88403213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015054189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049130416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139350035","doi":"10.1177/1474885107086444","title":"Modern Natural Law Meets the Market","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Politics; Natural law; Law; Value (mathematics); Economic Justice; Natural (archaeology); Political philosophy; Invisible hand; Adam smith; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Economics; Neoclassical economics; History","score_opus":0.023304266027049787,"score_gpt":0.2802020043281684,"score_spread":0.2568977383011186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139350035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012182965,0.0004703981,0.0012579809,0.0056659244,0.00052542356,0.000038266273,0.000006974031,0.000016967773,0.9798351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856905,0.000030489322,0.00031838138,0.0053706043,0.0016210884,1.5223183e-7,2.5568661e-7,0.000010997085,0.0069575347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613583,0.0026270128,0.00029336498,0.00007358683,0.0004366038,0.0004335852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830425,0.00094465265,0.00011820257,0.00012365461,0.00018325525,0.00032598354],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025020759,0.00008766354,0.00014066402,0.00002830938,0.0007300422,0.00003307253,0.00045889366,0.000017304921,0.00036110752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007616219,0.000055224387,0.00016246806,0.000070036804,0.004100166,0.00013756474,0.000046687353,0.00034641637,0.00006101734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032397118,0.00002172191,0.00002685552,0.0000010327437,0.000024502486,0.0002484735,0.0006616024,0.0000015397748,0.000012270267,0.99622893,0.0024069734,0.00033369078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021072975,0.000059473485,0.0011372656,0.000022030274,0.000029444513,0.00045039685,0.0009828651,0.0000047787375,0.000023329143,0.09609806,0.90086544,0.00011617831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054464683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053479353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007044886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050269515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145251685","doi":"10.1177/1474885113492728","title":"Cosmopolitanism and Hume’s general point of view","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Parochialism; Cosmopolitanism; Epistemology; Morality; Politics; Judgement; Doctrine; Vision; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.042289843328754864,"score_gpt":0.3165846373237098,"score_spread":0.27429479399495493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145251685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19574085,0.0006229307,0.00085160154,0.0131204575,0.0003346333,0.0001073493,0.000008975198,0.000017526429,0.78919566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949664,0.00006829625,0.00068867434,0.0026827794,0.0010460078,2.8883412e-7,2.0474539e-7,0.000015412734,0.0005319478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605036,0.0024759665,0.00052614545,0.00009410788,0.00035382202,0.00049957447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799776,0.00072996906,0.00014867171,0.00012236982,0.00026991186,0.00073130423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003924042,0.000102425256,0.0002604716,0.00006930794,0.00015016527,0.000047575766,0.00028557677,0.000047458736,0.00048883754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017780685,0.000080513215,0.00013273317,0.000068619665,0.0016958786,0.00023838671,0.00007150814,0.0003817864,0.00009215473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010091124,0.00004509477,0.000037856975,0.000018257302,0.000021882404,0.000026390304,0.001228598,1.1066471e-7,0.00016591113,0.996906,0.00032597876,0.0012138644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023769867,0.00018030484,0.0033614323,0.0000674863,0.000029127175,0.000029343006,0.001517124,0.0000014219011,0.00016909608,0.98875064,0.0055621658,0.000094177914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010316354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.540232e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79922557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000535872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011476304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6248535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150150645","doi":"10.1177/1474885114554466","title":"Rawls on the embedded self: Liberalism as an affective regime","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Politics; Passions; Sociology; Enlightenment; Normative; Economic Justice; Public reason; Counterintuitive; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.027020768384057946,"score_gpt":0.3202145593831995,"score_spread":0.29319379099914156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150150645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12948537,0.000017039063,0.0005300543,0.015961654,0.0004621724,0.00010371313,0.0000027919104,0.000053950855,0.85338324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859929,0.0000040186274,0.00011842842,0.009008356,0.0038685421,6.27422e-7,3.2675183e-7,0.000029360051,0.0009774467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812774,0.017230576,0.000336567,0.00016502116,0.00047980098,0.0005106515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99400127,0.004716462,0.0001240178,0.0003011471,0.00018371709,0.00067340326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013031948,0.00015207514,0.0002322885,0.000070063536,0.00050397555,0.00014223054,0.0006764261,0.000047180452,0.00074501184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005351323,0.000086717795,0.00022597329,0.00013036343,0.0009086466,0.00021970371,0.000049373353,0.00062043685,0.0005893016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016968432,0.00014584554,0.0000029530306,0.0000027095368,0.000032784526,0.00006929152,0.005595315,9.437206e-7,0.000038442293,0.9919985,0.00033164705,0.0016118761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029786225,0.0008051868,0.00012701083,0.00005294552,0.000038390313,0.000030945474,0.0021411027,0.0000029073367,0.0002842956,0.93514717,0.06094195,0.00013022752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000051922925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.847056e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85650754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000615803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006139022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81573576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330365905","doi":"10.1177/1474885113510124","title":"Civil religion and anticlericalism in James Harrington","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Politics; Champion; Spanish Civil War; Battle; Scholarship; Religious studies; Throne; Philosophy; Civil religion; Hebrew; Law; Sociology; Classics; History; Theology; Political science; Ancient history","score_opus":0.01377281530048795,"score_gpt":0.27161805936187494,"score_spread":0.257845244061387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330365905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4513719,0.00028181932,0.0007211227,0.004128716,0.00016002837,0.00005029252,0.0000016255838,0.00001172726,0.5432728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99622154,0.000086356566,0.00038785525,0.002031864,0.00044759133,2.4444134e-7,1.3850455e-7,0.000007642638,0.00081674615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795675,0.0011130807,0.0003009752,0.00007542741,0.00020790828,0.0003458522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989037,0.0004784552,0.00008791678,0.000062686675,0.00010459072,0.00036268623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015156439,0.00006832743,0.00014336544,0.00007636889,0.000108330285,0.00005967517,0.00015323464,0.000019784196,0.00023152574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097067334,0.000056263707,0.00005147002,0.00008768539,0.00113171,0.00018630078,0.0000373335,0.00019971687,0.000054255437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007844426,0.000022747132,0.0012887866,0.0000023785897,0.000005362346,0.000055765155,0.00048293392,7.360628e-7,0.000048300397,0.99571383,0.001109218,0.0012621023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009170068,0.00031212025,0.058275927,0.00025127854,0.000037365924,0.00015514111,0.006576374,0.000010146743,0.00009048674,0.5356781,0.3973271,0.00036895683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032796193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000056231343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54484963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055006676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018866528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41698328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334119050","doi":"10.1177/1474885106067288","title":"Politics and Vision","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.013454200959023485,"score_gpt":0.33799386698984585,"score_spread":0.32453966603082235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334119050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19956692,0.00018570726,0.0022988953,0.006906866,0.00038002353,0.000026977677,0.0000021160981,0.000018371402,0.7906141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941742,0.000046388337,0.00036070312,0.0010570908,0.00095033454,4.417776e-8,2.0514439e-7,0.000008114323,0.003402938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982316,0.0010326265,0.00024466487,0.00005013964,0.00019966073,0.00024129626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917364,0.0003459627,0.000077238044,0.00005310622,0.000117437965,0.00023259883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016230518,0.00004900531,0.00008735055,0.00004355461,0.00023820989,0.00007760477,0.00010931889,0.000019275922,0.00012250009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003854289,0.000039988197,0.00009560182,0.000050887153,0.00041556568,0.00011542727,0.000019755753,0.00017697719,0.000052667434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045421257,0.000029374836,0.00013179152,0.0000014139587,0.0000056916874,0.00003072161,0.0007631459,5.1314146e-7,0.00006460151,0.9935215,0.004966123,0.00048059033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003577131,0.00015879782,0.01415453,0.000053266256,0.00002922221,0.00008609105,0.009292796,0.0000037738296,0.00007582153,0.5318461,0.44382966,0.000112244416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008998431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029991972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7946073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004993408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048623686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1832142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336740991","doi":"10.1177/1474885115593701","title":"Normative reconstruction without foundation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10095310037372611,"score_gpt":0.3567589533472716,"score_spread":0.25580585297354547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336740991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040983062,0.00002941217,0.010205654,0.0060706865,0.0009940031,0.000042461397,0.0000018707511,0.000025129677,0.9416477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954697,0.000005121566,0.0009270175,0.001050946,0.002159345,1.3106708e-7,4.0918556e-7,0.0000098146065,0.00037751033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952468,0.003597423,0.0003602871,0.000066110864,0.0003998754,0.00032948094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981994,0.00041070956,0.00015575922,0.00007912782,0.0004565233,0.0006984926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075288615,0.00007051883,0.00013618538,0.00007704754,0.00017423237,0.00006280509,0.00020244771,0.000036191945,0.00011656049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005291252,0.000058662365,0.000082311046,0.00009119744,0.0009521089,0.0004479666,0.00002576521,0.00038707387,0.00032477413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057271965,0.000022813036,0.000100658246,0.000002510721,0.00001408594,0.000017679378,0.0038970946,0.0000012750148,0.0000069952066,0.99037105,0.000116563664,0.0053919936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034712782,0.0001514156,0.0005202166,0.000042821343,0.000024048228,0.00006749666,0.007488588,0.000004604751,0.000053782118,0.9761649,0.015054759,0.00008023312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018253248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020446244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95448667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017800508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003069697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6334505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2378102969","doi":"10.1177/1474885115608783","title":"Surveillance, freedom and the republic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Liberalism; Presupposition; Sociology; Power (physics); Negative liberty; Law and economics; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036787596995602405,"score_gpt":0.2966084499146628,"score_spread":0.2598208529190604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2378102969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043120634,0.0004706144,0.0011013212,0.005142886,0.0005492118,0.000049885817,0.0000030483284,0.000018192088,0.9495442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953965,0.000026608841,0.00013048443,0.001776087,0.0014319299,2.0387442e-7,1.5365177e-7,0.000009284378,0.0012287381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98985296,0.008988287,0.00032717342,0.00008405761,0.00030316302,0.00044434788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966863,0.002154206,0.00011309229,0.00014492763,0.00022534707,0.00067616656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020405168,0.00007809981,0.00021682565,0.000046009394,0.00020692043,0.000065619824,0.00037647982,0.00003456833,0.00013140518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011996145,0.000045390567,0.00010085995,0.00008630017,0.003953797,0.00013241697,0.0000830915,0.00033603547,0.00005639589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019165529,0.000017091828,0.00021177452,0.0000010453165,0.000025714706,0.000055779637,0.0008377555,4.5158743e-7,1.8571576e-7,0.9974834,0.0005570994,0.00061807816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012826951,0.0000765984,0.004582593,0.000008130086,0.000015184886,0.000072681796,0.0032599275,0.0000032585451,0.0000018535613,0.96316266,0.027471514,0.00006288057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018944344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001356097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042578078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017763459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406239785","doi":"10.1177/1474885114543572","title":"Two concepts of liberal developmentalism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Developmentalism; Enlightenment; Liberalism; Mill; Idealism; Politics; Romanticism; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Cultural imperialism; Historicism; Political philosophy; Classical liberalism; Sociology; Social science; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.10176823972783902,"score_gpt":0.38736851506617587,"score_spread":0.2856002753383369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406239785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07703225,0.00020185072,0.0006200973,0.0040595867,0.00063802785,0.0000395425,0.000006463227,0.000015908445,0.9173863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99480766,0.000005138107,0.0012512602,0.0019218059,0.0013010228,9.954911e-8,4.153636e-7,0.000013422252,0.00069917866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955665,0.002862687,0.0004983833,0.00007704915,0.0005480991,0.0004473152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978339,0.00062167377,0.00015653904,0.000094581104,0.00035537448,0.00093789626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065037073,0.000087954104,0.00021355489,0.00006648123,0.000094770985,0.000024834588,0.00039183648,0.000034559118,0.00013474701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030561602,0.00007273724,0.00012074109,0.00010067294,0.0015075636,0.00018346835,0.000068165005,0.00035845907,0.00009049025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053837553,0.00005095655,0.00009642275,0.0000042263546,0.00002254999,0.00009767478,0.0055131325,9.759251e-7,0.00003052152,0.9927675,0.0005710066,0.00079119054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000696212,0.00015301959,0.0007042327,0.00005759274,0.000022907014,0.000030213245,0.0037270335,4.6739444e-7,0.00039540007,0.97843647,0.01567484,0.00010162267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001914867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013017955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9177754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010497528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005091689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5554681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465858461","doi":"10.1177/1474885116653366","title":"Four concepts of rules: A theory of rule egalitarianism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Polity; Capitalism; Classical liberalism; Law and economics; Liberalism; Rule of law; Sociology; Statute; Economic Justice; Law; Just society; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07187380475831448,"score_gpt":0.34295795970887155,"score_spread":0.27108415495055704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465858461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12468659,0.00027396934,0.0118608065,0.0071761785,0.0005973612,0.00009170026,0.00008762211,0.000023289776,0.8552025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967001,0.0000297124,0.0005498912,0.0006941282,0.0010184229,2.1024115e-7,1.8675142e-7,0.000022043007,0.0009852956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916268,0.006214187,0.0008442995,0.00012580333,0.00061160355,0.0005773067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99436224,0.004035894,0.00036350047,0.00022588458,0.00043899962,0.00057349313],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0110758385,0.00013259522,0.00039126005,0.00010726726,0.00011908859,0.000014044222,0.0006293188,0.00008016893,0.000690187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00883621,0.00008566546,0.0003268556,0.000091901384,0.0035980167,0.0002177677,0.00008311517,0.0003213255,0.00010090271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015790355,0.00009096942,0.000043706073,0.000022559798,0.00006347879,0.000058640664,0.0027534075,1.3581625e-7,0.0009308278,0.9933224,0.000079055346,0.0024769434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006313057,0.00026473196,0.0015406919,0.0002838656,0.000058990696,0.000017251681,0.002577835,1.0162501e-7,0.001423461,0.9891623,0.0039274036,0.000112018315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018281055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.325464e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8720135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075244854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035295874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514638431","doi":"10.1177/1474885116665600","title":"Which conception of political equality do deliberative mini-publics promote?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Politics; Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Inequality; Sociology; Deliberation; Equal opportunity; Law and economics; Egalitarianism; Political science; Political economy; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05475570247945612,"score_gpt":0.3583092928421478,"score_spread":0.3035535903626917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514638431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70869017,0.00007629077,0.005701458,0.014210858,0.0012325832,0.00016957274,0.000071806164,0.000037994807,0.26980928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949627,0.00001549768,0.00050487916,0.00066947757,0.0032933466,7.3349884e-7,8.418261e-7,0.000026350797,0.0005261594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908582,0.006411848,0.0008737803,0.00016369518,0.0007550005,0.0009374932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948453,0.002342772,0.00035436818,0.00019291636,0.0012210446,0.0010436245],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004948555,0.00016024207,0.00038582398,0.00011118914,0.00018348666,0.000059183327,0.00046026902,0.00009985782,0.00061497866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0121612055,0.00010975455,0.00021521235,0.00021980715,0.0018008163,0.00030142505,0.00007064952,0.00031298012,0.000090190835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006247272,0.00011411381,0.0012386157,0.000011178315,0.00004508204,0.000016713659,0.007895252,3.370187e-8,0.0005950126,0.985874,0.00035409213,0.003793431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00193714,0.0010206467,0.013698353,0.0004178565,0.00016240361,0.00003813633,0.053461444,8.4996395e-7,0.0058042747,0.88525176,0.037752923,0.0004542223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005332873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011105811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28627256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024426123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063668337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529981061","doi":"10.1177/1474885116673546","title":"Freedom without being: Kant’s corrective as the philosophical crux of Agamben’s ‘Homo Sacer’ series","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Subject (documents); State of exception; Relation (database); Epistemology; State (computer science); Autonomy; Politics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023963547000787774,"score_gpt":0.2977983638837159,"score_spread":0.2738348168829281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529981061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19030419,0.000102921345,0.0013616869,0.017789317,0.00083407765,0.000109455366,0.000020053567,0.000029431687,0.78944886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943181,0.000044955425,0.000100496276,0.0013693371,0.0019003291,7.65307e-7,1.6720033e-7,0.000026423204,0.0022393758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912866,0.006597875,0.0006413462,0.00017745349,0.00055197027,0.0007447648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529755,0.0032014006,0.00029215825,0.00027885643,0.00035194808,0.0005781104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060591823,0.00018417201,0.00042036572,0.00007983453,0.0003612236,0.000031333777,0.00078520575,0.00009789457,0.0010103495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009067269,0.000096711294,0.00030796503,0.00011230155,0.006112935,0.0002811846,0.00014150677,0.0005170025,0.00020138235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046006643,0.00008469752,0.0003901125,0.0000041251524,0.00010411695,0.00011446539,0.0015484573,4.8050634e-7,0.00009802145,0.996046,0.000071714654,0.0010777077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005883698,0.00048580428,0.0051246835,0.00012589472,0.00008011636,0.00014954162,0.0026458525,5.3635955e-7,0.00087022374,0.9865404,0.0032463735,0.00014223561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022331213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027744832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80401397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012209194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031360274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761507624","doi":"10.1177/1474885117735961","title":"What was primitive accumulation? Reconstructing the origin of a critical concept","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Capitalism; Capital accumulation; Context (archaeology); Neoclassical economics; State (computer science); Power (physics); Sociology; Economics; Law; History; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.09934580354544337,"score_gpt":0.40307865158500894,"score_spread":0.3037328480395656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761507624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24869336,0.00029560507,0.003108517,0.027906658,0.003215587,0.00016539288,0.000014829778,0.000021453558,0.7165786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968653,0.000022727956,0.00040383253,0.0008250585,0.0015017169,3.610322e-7,1.7423882e-7,0.000012415805,0.00036842312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614877,0.002371337,0.0005727016,0.0001189042,0.00027113286,0.0005171751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99516475,0.003433697,0.00037765095,0.00028756313,0.00032437278,0.0004119382],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00536985,0.00010350268,0.00025888596,0.000045689834,0.0008597394,0.00035116335,0.00079596456,0.00004186262,0.00044658902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0154895205,0.00007280203,0.00019871707,0.000031858443,0.004861688,0.0010716546,0.00012095999,0.00039613122,0.000035558343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027447313,0.000032813467,0.00019616338,0.000005003069,0.000026516458,0.000037292557,0.0028047257,6.003791e-7,0.000013306714,0.98844266,0.00004669807,0.00836675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000648849,0.00017736568,0.011502769,0.0002938015,0.000102718375,0.000080961654,0.03771983,0.000013061965,0.00061969756,0.930451,0.018192356,0.00019762051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044909968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036667561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7481719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007298791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002614024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766811220","doi":"10.1177/1474885117731941","title":"The two faces of personhood: Hobbes, corporate agency and the personality of the state","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Personhood; State (computer science); Agency (philosophy); Politics; Ambiguity; Epistemology; Sociology; Personality; Social contract; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0684273226156935,"score_gpt":0.26585277960035913,"score_spread":0.19742545698466563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766811220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79009336,0.0019119683,0.000032648353,0.015053274,0.0010164991,0.00017469228,0.00015674715,0.000006408818,0.19155441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624133,0.00011863916,0.00001036926,0.000513529,0.00079143717,4.8292657e-7,2.9435196e-7,0.000016784117,0.0023071044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628097,0.0022492409,0.00062924705,0.000109105575,0.000388099,0.00034332584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969216,0.0013163714,0.0008777877,0.0004537513,0.0002467031,0.00018380753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035473478,0.0001568603,0.0003261888,0.000020677913,0.00090541464,0.00018444768,0.00096688635,0.000013498502,0.00022805097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013347137,0.000060733477,0.0003446001,0.000016477077,0.0071004294,0.00012725982,0.00024819054,0.00042330552,0.000009241145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027214634,0.000055726152,0.0001556451,0.00002547904,0.00011767601,0.000011313025,0.004401774,3.8179718e-7,0.000024454313,0.9935267,0.000118425975,0.0012902715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013484154,0.00016294829,0.009923777,0.000121762976,0.00013297198,0.000029249453,0.0020287076,0.000012160557,0.00021110717,0.96672827,0.019197088,0.00010355308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049130675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006612202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20614801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013217976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004582682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99560165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795050830","doi":"10.1177/1474885118763881","title":"Beyond the search for the subject: An anti-essentialist ontology for liberal democracy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Essentialism; Political philosophy; Agency (philosophy); Democracy; Normative; Sociology; Criticism; Skepticism; Politics; Subjectivity; Subject (documents); Liberal democracy; Autonomy; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.057851109693580774,"score_gpt":0.38810817835008776,"score_spread":0.330257068656507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795050830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2921776,0.00078946096,0.06928603,0.23910299,0.010477658,0.0012539665,0.00009612747,0.000082927465,0.38673326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98484653,0.000027326625,0.00052762416,0.004737981,0.0077872067,0.0000015322915,0.0000012574927,0.000030369165,0.0020401918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951686,0.0032127798,0.00038844414,0.0001436737,0.00035019434,0.00073626183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994051,0.0045674164,0.00013928514,0.00024273843,0.0006944471,0.00030512759],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012707902,0.00011400553,0.00019228015,0.00004893051,0.0017364899,0.00019237197,0.0009609038,0.0000580293,0.00016922521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024414172,0.00006236266,0.00023470906,0.00009709069,0.0032603191,0.00020407145,0.000060696864,0.0004298007,0.000032138843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020354243,0.00005552673,0.00007872372,0.0000067997316,0.0000483541,0.000009632755,0.012196959,9.584644e-7,0.00007110823,0.98082596,0.003762453,0.0027399675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009384136,0.0011779146,0.0051539857,0.00002797894,0.00015868655,0.000076723714,0.021494968,0.000060919345,0.0005344573,0.73628145,0.23389149,0.00020298843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007226196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015205712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6926689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043212734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033217613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888301383","doi":"10.1177/1474885118795284","title":"Back to the rough ground: Textual, oral and enactive meaning in comparative political theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Orality; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Political philosophy; Political communication; Meaning (existential); Indigenous; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10010465212073977,"score_gpt":0.4157304206856598,"score_spread":0.31562576856492003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888301383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2819355,0.000050885035,0.0020783576,0.012895544,0.0002543921,0.0001706391,0.000005882865,0.000008557096,0.70260024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994502,0.0000055068645,0.00039442553,0.0026844398,0.001497715,0.0000011608034,2.9730492e-7,0.0000108312,0.00090359134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902298,0.006824661,0.00041061797,0.0002029698,0.0005815567,0.0017504286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99533546,0.0023124672,0.0000777334,0.00015161352,0.00029214125,0.0018305649],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0149280345,0.00013313873,0.00024265704,0.0001467892,0.00046917575,0.00022036224,0.0005929502,0.000034493794,0.0008133425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006198759,0.000085114916,0.00007526198,0.00036589243,0.0030136204,0.0004104337,0.0001439127,0.00047483723,0.00061704085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013151525,0.000073762974,0.00021479987,0.0000021363178,0.000013792373,0.000015108273,0.015984124,3.326987e-7,0.00003558679,0.9807782,0.00042808292,0.002322522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004882887,0.0010051919,0.041152563,0.000120083925,0.000023362503,0.000055624263,0.136636,0.000017366756,0.00022657448,0.7780051,0.042023487,0.00024633858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051918655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019035509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7125665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004900711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005116401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893045664","doi":"10.1177/1474885118799454","title":"Political realism and epistemic democracy: An international perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Democracy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Positivism; International relations; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05384028813508685,"score_gpt":0.37461957835609455,"score_spread":0.3207792902210077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893045664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0578925,0.000042338263,0.0011865055,0.058538068,0.0007323969,0.000045506582,0.000017961793,0.000032330197,0.8815124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98671895,0.000011822177,0.0005336449,0.004707073,0.007648719,1.5308288e-7,6.9371896e-7,0.000021285556,0.00035764472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510676,0.003080549,0.00041818197,0.00018568535,0.0004921817,0.0007166623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684834,0.000858799,0.00011008185,0.00015805829,0.0007117039,0.0013129939],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048175366,0.00012527894,0.00019789684,0.000121361925,0.00040395936,0.00010714182,0.00050559605,0.000071353956,0.00022929361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054207756,0.000107416316,0.00010547916,0.00008010534,0.0046298048,0.00045493522,0.000093850875,0.0005584556,0.000081637554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009225369,0.000068749694,0.00010520627,0.0000027171045,0.000034849007,0.00011450983,0.004248867,2.3418533e-8,0.00003592419,0.99486613,0.00007398189,0.00035677225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030568443,0.00035692693,0.0038077645,0.000044665092,0.0000344784,0.00013930355,0.012857731,0.0000044482094,0.000053438158,0.97660094,0.0056686625,0.00012594975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010863623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000066434663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92882645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026429576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002300368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922264105","doi":"10.1177/1474885119834760","title":"Bergson contra Bergson: Race and morality in <i>The Two Sources</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Reactionary; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Race (biology); Subject (documents); Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01765464601363614,"score_gpt":0.22929004603121766,"score_spread":0.21163540001758152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922264105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68298453,0.00033324093,0.00006962443,0.012625057,0.00015810868,0.00006417517,0.0000104688725,0.000009387419,0.3037454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99341816,0.000010418355,0.000018561823,0.004582352,0.0011763906,3.664818e-7,0.0000010020594,0.000016309368,0.0007764705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677926,0.0018818735,0.0005265129,0.00014777934,0.00029570784,0.00036887388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848515,0.000875986,0.00013511612,0.00019070866,0.00009073154,0.00022232815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003308659,0.00015379307,0.00036335184,0.0000806304,0.00010044195,0.00015091283,0.00035924715,0.000017872751,0.0014654883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024665886,0.00008635142,0.00019404259,0.000050115064,0.00086386246,0.000150004,0.00006950254,0.00050113554,0.00018124242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012296738,0.00010737393,0.00026559934,0.000013874743,0.000046118257,0.0001302783,0.0025345057,0.000002101515,0.000030815238,0.9958974,0.00007771044,0.00077124545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010760309,0.00030021672,0.0017120657,0.00007023604,0.000106524254,0.00008428598,0.0022107514,0.000028754921,0.00003418074,0.95363325,0.04057865,0.00016504285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014161826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000048257657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3104336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016995064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012944073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940952508","doi":"10.1177/1474885119843116","title":"“I tremble with my whole heart”: Cicero on the anxieties of eloquence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of Glasgow","keywords":"Cicero; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Persuasion; Ethos; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Literature; Epistemology; Sociology; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02664706967549112,"score_gpt":0.2846821906684124,"score_spread":0.25803512099292125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940952508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59445983,0.00007949025,0.00007842056,0.03075298,0.00015599871,0.000089693254,0.00000396773,0.000011797479,0.37436786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99176276,0.000016035874,0.00009608458,0.0013427387,0.0003145425,2.3853173e-7,6.351476e-8,0.000012489372,0.0064550736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687254,0.001864841,0.0002905204,0.00009964575,0.00052290177,0.0003495512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780256,0.001524569,0.00016092049,0.00016632052,0.00018869792,0.0001569569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002971324,0.00009561551,0.00024598106,0.00004510014,0.00017724978,0.00003931454,0.00038865797,0.000017193574,0.0002794264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010507208,0.000050643288,0.00012764166,0.00014580648,0.0012411972,0.00010117775,0.000063659194,0.00030155346,0.0002025696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013471776,0.00006570108,0.00068177405,0.000007915883,0.000034809284,0.000014087157,0.0021211843,0.000003285078,0.0005460579,0.994035,0.0017979462,0.0005575388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019203558,0.0051759435,0.066781476,0.0011988098,0.00016997656,0.00006762186,0.10171563,0.000006767382,0.0076497598,0.23058334,0.5841021,0.00062824204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012902231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000065425143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76345164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041645653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096650336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45732427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981072376","doi":"10.1177/1474885119881313","title":"Radical republicanism and solidarity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Solidarity; Elite; Social order; Sociology; Law and economics; Power (physics); Law; Political economy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.018432517933243044,"score_gpt":0.29537147530430125,"score_spread":0.2769389573710582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981072376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35574692,0.000094862226,0.00066276244,0.0021717874,0.00029349953,0.000050722636,0.0000028441839,0.000021079275,0.6409555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940559,0.00001853759,0.00034676702,0.0028386097,0.0007159666,1.2499203e-7,1.3799112e-7,0.000013134156,0.0020108018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507356,0.0034338688,0.00040423806,0.00013676527,0.0003644639,0.0005870823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775153,0.00095932145,0.00011374506,0.00016360385,0.00013050616,0.00088126864],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008128637,0.00009748143,0.00022483672,0.00007300829,0.00017748182,0.00010085496,0.00038074463,0.000043177017,0.0011023178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033218404,0.00007880389,0.000113127455,0.00009055723,0.0014969807,0.00033372175,0.00008708809,0.00043525387,0.00023826046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004733956,0.000036113266,0.0002979472,0.0000059320814,0.000015411875,0.000067173125,0.000653584,1.2699351e-7,0.00022816237,0.9968885,0.00014570846,0.0016139545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048304794,0.000260429,0.007162373,0.00005611558,0.000022100734,0.00010657434,0.0018787304,0.0000019670977,0.00021866376,0.8541957,0.13546291,0.00015138426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008777595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.6513885e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63894475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060138103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016542188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158103079","doi":"10.1177/14748851211009206","title":"Hannah Arendt, antiracist rebellion, and the counterinsurgent logic of the social","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Gender studies; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.039838011889816206,"score_gpt":0.3184187428695511,"score_spread":0.27858073097973485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158103079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22317138,0.0015701137,0.0013790348,0.093456075,0.0018661111,0.0002254482,0.00007280149,0.0000294552,0.6782296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945767,0.00005681609,0.00005001931,0.0031785553,0.0014137021,3.5803882e-7,3.9058185e-7,0.000017874872,0.00070558523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914499,0.006684184,0.0006247209,0.00013891631,0.0006208755,0.0004814241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778205,0.0009750323,0.00027988688,0.00021586471,0.00044822562,0.00029893566],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053443587,0.00012843664,0.000322408,0.000044556047,0.0005781602,0.000086543245,0.00054857036,0.000038795562,0.00023497936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032256418,0.00007194291,0.0003257037,0.00021866588,0.0038603062,0.00010020181,0.00022828043,0.0004170668,0.000021558097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009254753,0.000066385895,0.00008633046,0.000013015527,0.00004783181,0.00010225407,0.003368781,4.7533004e-7,0.00007963086,0.9951064,0.00057527167,0.00046104923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010995126,0.00007670989,0.00665601,0.00010831499,0.00011374904,0.0001220167,0.007157899,0.000002415143,0.000531363,0.9485454,0.035435133,0.00015148956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020432777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005354824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77140534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006157319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025255268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W363386269","doi":"10.1177/1474885115584834","title":"The ethics of deportation in liberal democratic states","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Democracy; Discretion; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Immigration; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10535913184218394,"score_gpt":0.37790406473357147,"score_spread":0.27254493289138754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W363386269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30281338,0.0005692191,0.0025269212,0.057299834,0.00089958566,0.00012207693,0.000006123672,0.000019457799,0.6357434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776036,0.000039805334,0.0002696936,0.0011036046,0.0004607707,1.7773623e-7,3.4256863e-7,0.000009714946,0.0003555376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992235,0.0061345403,0.00060682825,0.000059811322,0.0005765333,0.0003872827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948803,0.0040243138,0.00019211895,0.00009584683,0.0003924627,0.00041494417],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01848403,0.00006630401,0.00014773842,0.000055246997,0.00015828978,0.000038035258,0.00031048813,0.000051898878,0.000009197379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017040517,0.00004437185,0.000078323494,0.00012574905,0.0012290354,0.00014990458,0.000029472503,0.0008251946,0.000014118881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005802596,0.00003635208,0.00028357207,0.0000066360267,0.000010104637,0.000058481015,0.00872228,0.000015466188,0.000005472059,0.99013144,0.00022679089,0.0004453868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023386278,0.00013286983,0.002428764,0.0000533916,0.000013558644,0.00000766924,0.006583999,0.000008925854,0.000052747982,0.9888601,0.0015724336,0.000051716048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003321359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024880905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69494694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007793062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005318056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99123937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200206011","doi":"10.1177/14748851211065132","title":"Moral proximity and the territorial imperative","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Meaning (existential); Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Moral order; Moral imperative; Law; Control (management); Sociology; Business; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.017760603647359357,"score_gpt":0.2897067733291391,"score_spread":0.2719461696817797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200206011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55848175,0.0009937361,0.005171105,0.015961371,0.003340691,0.00020720976,0.000010296666,0.000025841888,0.41580802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99344456,0.000048650447,0.00021381034,0.0005385101,0.004378525,3.2265874e-7,6.5466674e-7,0.000005795031,0.0013691887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946202,0.004635483,0.00025783104,0.00006937246,0.00024308781,0.00017401806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989991,0.000391949,0.00008937721,0.000068533074,0.0003004848,0.00015053133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037491822,0.000058215202,0.00012358841,0.000020687927,0.00029067707,0.00013494806,0.00011958728,0.000019523168,0.0001675586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027300944,0.00003343149,0.00008566419,0.000057287856,0.0006823918,0.00023027259,0.000023391545,0.0002135708,0.000009504233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082696584,0.00001898155,0.00009307191,0.0000013146494,0.000015341562,0.00002186211,0.010154574,1.668778e-7,0.00007303707,0.9877541,0.0006819155,0.0011029383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021502317,0.00021193124,0.005607549,0.000056700213,0.00007870405,0.000089545465,0.023730056,0.000018697114,0.001245859,0.87478805,0.09186567,0.00015698749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026837775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058183694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4349628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039797826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019879085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32683754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207030675","doi":"10.1177/14748851211073728","title":"The household in Isocrates’ political thought","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ruler; Politics; Elite; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Metaphor; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0433048917237659,"score_gpt":0.31102145708512435,"score_spread":0.26771656536135846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207030675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14773203,0.0007983263,0.0002277159,0.15069304,0.0014269985,0.0001670726,0.00002522205,0.00005559566,0.698874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99076194,0.000029078825,0.000051346025,0.002388649,0.0010699881,0.000001504027,1.6686569e-7,0.000021654208,0.005675649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990517,0.0071163075,0.0005471157,0.00012788485,0.0007217018,0.0009699853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966065,0.0026429675,0.00013076785,0.00015431822,0.000080375205,0.00038506283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009625846,0.0001084823,0.0002181336,0.00008433767,0.001181463,0.0000932787,0.00077813055,0.000016109207,0.0001773699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032611368,0.00007441099,0.0001870978,0.00028549746,0.001306138,0.000093826464,0.0003945973,0.0008530034,0.000030972682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006575332,0.00010270913,0.00043345502,0.0000016797912,0.000019593632,0.00030127642,0.000977048,0.0000031515312,0.000014418733,0.9931595,0.0034411412,0.0014803237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044525196,0.00026130347,0.008535626,0.000018605062,0.0000231704,0.0000512264,0.03607622,0.0000028512993,0.000026910227,0.36858958,0.58581823,0.00015100518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026602253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003380822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8430299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033583282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001870098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9086978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214910169","doi":"10.1177/14748851221077564","title":"Reply to my critics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Injustice; State (computer science); Dimension (graph theory); Duty; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.024102881244382406,"score_gpt":0.31470794419758197,"score_spread":0.29060506295319954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214910169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19814996,0.0002153023,0.016065406,0.019126186,0.0017438997,0.00014827719,0.000019464915,0.000046631594,0.7644849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98173076,0.0000067282654,0.0005312292,0.010956219,0.0012709167,6.937366e-7,8.90111e-7,0.000013040794,0.005489528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565816,0.003164204,0.0003510219,0.000083245875,0.00046722984,0.00027616732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999027,0.00023761486,0.00008736325,0.00010704567,0.00020775637,0.00033318342],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053696292,0.000058837275,0.00010501084,0.00010182073,0.00048633714,0.000060349746,0.00031470045,0.000007905363,0.0017109546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023557835,0.00005175578,0.000099415076,0.00014518201,0.00013546196,0.00012494068,0.000051354575,0.00026126966,0.000089416215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003135596,0.00004012439,0.00003851484,0.0000012655665,0.0000069630296,0.00004009434,0.008958284,0.000008040469,0.00008701941,0.9714059,0.017784137,0.0015982706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012674383,0.0003637243,0.0007853551,0.000010450988,0.000014180636,0.000027516306,0.018228186,0.0000026761065,0.00009992709,0.08129864,0.898964,0.00007860294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003243982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000073393753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8901073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015439779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016506569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230886526","doi":"10.1177/1474885117718371","title":"Contra politanism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Teleology; Personhood; Sovereignty; Politics; Political philosophy; State (computer science); Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); State of nature; Sociology; Social contract; Moral agency; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06216706977571082,"score_gpt":0.27363641230366903,"score_spread":0.2114693425279582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230886526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023946233,0.00022743145,0.00025700184,0.009658571,0.0019574112,0.00005608984,0.000052615705,0.000027423906,0.96381724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98344773,0.000009951333,0.00007870331,0.0030485685,0.0082877735,2.9038884e-7,0.0000010796091,0.000036943402,0.0050889677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975727,0.00074973726,0.00060147844,0.00013931375,0.0003196622,0.0006170978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980012,0.00036409803,0.00030976158,0.00043748133,0.00021666665,0.00067079277],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015060055,0.00018702506,0.0003325147,0.00006760525,0.0006061952,0.00042208817,0.0008476003,0.000025076914,0.0032130503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010991414,0.00013039898,0.00034809113,0.0000070274964,0.0014501822,0.00032240088,0.000133967,0.00045407648,0.0006217066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008992428,0.00012002181,0.000021249192,0.000011497497,0.00007465146,0.00034326097,0.00055616605,5.3748202e-8,0.000027427304,0.9961816,0.0009848286,0.0015893367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006686595,0.0002656047,0.0014915381,0.00007190612,0.000059823677,0.000085575535,0.00041667948,0.000001197135,0.00010026474,0.7084076,0.2882786,0.00015255358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008874386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.38952e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9595015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039921597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003381014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383736014","doi":"10.1177/14748851231185223","title":"Democratic politics and hope: An Arendtian perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Normative; Epistemology; Sociology; Political philosophy; Narrative; Perspective (graphical); Action (physics); Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044276841479169424,"score_gpt":0.34654224200448225,"score_spread":0.3022654005253128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383736014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24351402,0.00020524142,0.00084649125,0.022800727,0.00068738224,0.0001574384,0.000042603173,0.0001933191,0.7315528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994196,0.000026397307,0.00030045558,0.0018061352,0.0023512836,5.2304813e-7,0.0000014457244,0.000048512396,0.0012692563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935614,0.004068834,0.0005122312,0.0002270591,0.0005755274,0.0010549343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659675,0.00091826817,0.00013282165,0.00022656095,0.00038923442,0.0017363867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004346226,0.00018311662,0.00030541632,0.00031554073,0.0004730133,0.00014707063,0.00048619002,0.000052994725,0.0001725954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004706518,0.00016144231,0.00014485262,0.00034673716,0.0015483036,0.00039952146,0.00011801923,0.00048372147,0.00029102026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020033422,0.00006051726,0.00010099452,0.0000083671275,0.000036727553,0.00046426724,0.00614381,0.0000012637033,0.000035486944,0.9919537,0.000590308,0.00058457116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036449614,0.00038729646,0.005274694,0.000051636784,0.00005702959,0.00006384165,0.024866175,0.000011092446,0.00004059086,0.9636418,0.005039015,0.00020231787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007713278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008771574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.750682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021663106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026076773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65834266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385325580","doi":"10.1177/14748851231186702","title":"Corruption and political institutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Mandate; Language change; Democracy; Institution; Bureaucracy; Political science; Public institution; Public administration; Power (physics); Political corruption; Hierarchy; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.1296851289412882,"score_gpt":0.38588446142991,"score_spread":0.2561993324886218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385325580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08602569,0.00006377643,0.0021431674,0.032458253,0.0007197221,0.000058346843,0.00001627405,0.00009538365,0.8784194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522686,0.000028260944,0.00011509691,0.0023066278,0.0017702451,2.5540768e-7,0.0000010698017,0.000012462288,0.0005391139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964855,0.0019729175,0.00034811426,0.00010142147,0.00037228534,0.0007198049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997585,0.0011071233,0.000058473586,0.00009637657,0.00015782789,0.0009952049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049535544,0.000085696665,0.00015403163,0.00015575836,0.0004070663,0.000066392284,0.00021221914,0.00005468941,0.000086424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005180728,0.00007373189,0.00010082241,0.00021752584,0.0019231043,0.00020286425,0.00007229901,0.0004724392,0.0003364359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019068377,0.000027953387,0.000077185825,0.0000074095356,0.000012464856,0.00015642346,0.00076152734,8.4180044e-7,0.000025283687,0.9979901,0.0002524786,0.0006693148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023569805,0.00010583494,0.006802206,0.00004833301,0.000031290518,0.000048658458,0.0029935269,0.0000045234924,0.000017755936,0.9533771,0.03623921,0.00009583514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020736046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017548117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90920115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088402616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025178434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7085758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385660671","doi":"10.1177/14748851231192776","title":"The retrieval of positive freedom, post-Kantian perfectionism and neo-Roman liberty in contemporary political thought","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Perfectionism (psychology); Classical liberalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Liberalism; Environmental ethics; Agnosticism; Negative liberty; Scholarship; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04850845939536583,"score_gpt":0.3237251058457488,"score_spread":0.275216646450383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385660671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4169739,0.00034584058,0.00009016365,0.052851476,0.00076931034,0.00017305186,0.000052816675,0.00004776123,0.5286957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685013,0.00003703304,0.000040677787,0.0012450782,0.0011832125,2.727886e-7,0.0000014548476,0.000025675243,0.0006164391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923927,0.005251178,0.0007281656,0.00017333531,0.000575118,0.0008794712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99428105,0.0043288446,0.00016421305,0.00017525231,0.00032121886,0.0007294349],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009113318,0.00015252459,0.00031810114,0.0001819568,0.000509933,0.00009995196,0.0004148736,0.000101259204,0.000027184424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069081606,0.00010764303,0.00019142454,0.00037421385,0.0034058946,0.0002372588,0.0001413911,0.000902876,0.000037684204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027833632,0.00005259977,0.00031412792,0.000013200659,0.00003776477,0.0002755841,0.002487299,4.3504178e-7,0.0001248724,0.9960506,0.00018852402,0.00017665303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008565186,0.00069766346,0.06818553,0.00020782309,0.000044459397,0.00008709313,0.01301185,0.000013760559,0.00030937511,0.91211903,0.0042583183,0.00020859508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019426849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013694033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57987624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097047305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039784142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388832958","doi":"10.1177/14748851231214252","title":"How many worlds are there? One, but also many: Decolonial theory, comparison, ‘reality’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Politics; Sociology; Multiculturalism; Thriving; Field (mathematics); Relativism; Diversity (politics); Scope (computer science); Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Social science; Political science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07819730367818835,"score_gpt":0.3514237583419059,"score_spread":0.2732264546637176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388832958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1958431,0.0013750118,0.0090857,0.06887608,0.0020265502,0.00027396937,0.000038853148,0.00024234311,0.72223836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98582125,0.00030689166,0.000115356386,0.0011883202,0.0027624401,0.0000011279071,0.0000012250929,0.000034103858,0.009769266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99211717,0.0053172694,0.00062923244,0.00024075426,0.00067540735,0.0010201783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701685,0.0014687722,0.00040980332,0.000210926,0.00025868762,0.00063496846],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062032244,0.0002210354,0.0005607129,0.00011563324,0.001078637,0.00023880914,0.0007696573,0.00007900968,0.0015150721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022539508,0.00015559407,0.00034303498,0.0003389815,0.0023589265,0.00018708462,0.00024373399,0.0005755285,0.0004657403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014140867,0.00015084146,0.0009854457,0.000008828669,0.00012167218,0.000510821,0.0014626478,0.0000011857826,0.000013555864,0.98169816,0.00950241,0.0054030297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007266178,0.00055262935,0.0979208,0.00012723242,0.00011956161,0.00001670018,0.096593186,0.000009387731,0.00006722737,0.48702395,0.3164596,0.00038310324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056168683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056325272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78997815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014082174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000750911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407984527","doi":"10.1177/14748851251314735","title":"Hamilton's fear: Republican judicial review and the separation of complicit powers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Separation of powers; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01999780710642225,"score_gpt":0.3334159596771743,"score_spread":0.31341815257075206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407984527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049550966,0.0121383,0.0007828408,0.031540386,0.00023596907,0.00013284724,0.0000044617314,0.000008041785,0.95020205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99177855,0.0020196543,0.000031028067,0.0053637046,0.00024846295,4.5744957e-7,2.2779909e-7,0.000002691044,0.0005552238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974417,0.0017234528,0.0003752898,0.00006583072,0.00022588208,0.00016780956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988456,0.0005691751,0.00016401285,0.00006916544,0.0002670886,0.000084989835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004547123,0.000059491576,0.00025641583,0.00004699577,0.00032228508,0.00002418041,0.00020174496,0.000012305162,0.00006695515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017693401,0.000037288035,0.00010832696,0.00017384965,0.00240309,0.00006875058,0.000048674432,0.0001492912,0.0000036503295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006155365,0.000015685697,0.000070272516,0.000015425767,0.00005608745,0.0000041226904,0.00043000167,2.1888019e-7,0.0000050768367,0.99520504,0.0022959735,0.0018405179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010876391,0.0001173656,0.015589346,0.00088867976,0.00043231697,0.000017751563,0.0041102525,0.0000011214332,0.000016235983,0.6786451,0.29897222,0.00012195837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008687362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011427362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98682344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033761007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001534205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8854285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409982317","doi":"10.1177/14748851251337317","title":"The unbearable lightness of servitude: Étienne de la Boétie and the fragility of freedom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fragility; Philosophy; Lightness; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.011420913250980972,"score_gpt":0.24118129092060284,"score_spread":0.22976037766962187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409982317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2342017,0.0047313473,0.0005168438,0.016380914,0.00080480095,0.00016673308,0.000052710024,0.000015022816,0.7431299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971513,0.00010081575,0.00004078625,0.0006927223,0.0005543928,6.5003076e-7,3.4014298e-7,0.000011492131,0.0014474724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573773,0.0029858798,0.0006470556,0.00009126526,0.00021274411,0.00032534264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950559,0.004149039,0.00018582845,0.00023731061,0.0002216809,0.00015024083],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004882503,0.00012349141,0.0003249678,0.000048212798,0.00023004392,0.00007498805,0.00045901956,0.000027598542,0.00016478478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010943504,0.00005879197,0.0002194422,0.000050102004,0.0040775905,0.00006659601,0.00014888927,0.0004129918,0.000003921767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004978973,0.00012659372,0.00005985681,0.00006726777,0.00013155954,0.000010987164,0.0011524976,0.0000029835385,0.000024661744,0.99712265,0.0003213389,0.00048173039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011890163,0.00012889551,0.0020581733,0.00017129749,0.00012491796,0.000017679064,0.0014832565,0.00002367456,0.0002865199,0.9170735,0.07737565,0.000067409805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024463152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016936064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76294965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001931851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005639996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414629946","doi":"10.1177/14748851251380542","title":"The retrieval of liberal socialism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Creed; Normative; Socialism; Classical liberalism; Politics; Political philosophy; Theme (computing)","score_opus":0.017466658382633417,"score_gpt":0.29438701943591816,"score_spread":0.27692036105328477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414629946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08108894,0.00053177914,0.00028101925,0.0083964635,0.0012240744,0.00003294348,0.0000037232858,0.000008855856,0.9084322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795586,0.000046169927,0.00004376039,0.0010204418,0.00083955785,5.8603444e-8,8.951158e-8,0.000005391921,0.018485963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975138,0.0014483813,0.00044425664,0.000058752856,0.00016066065,0.000374188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984863,0.0009546138,0.00012791433,0.000091497226,0.00011828887,0.0002214027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047498266,0.00005961211,0.00016786785,0.000048991667,0.00044292593,0.000032637083,0.0004063611,0.000026741574,0.00013559553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016597912,0.000040439623,0.00019645011,0.000074850184,0.001363421,0.00007007968,0.00004030402,0.00021280529,0.000035713783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008774034,0.000022535514,0.000037612524,0.0000036111442,0.000030077215,0.000010966586,0.0009163225,1.5700054e-7,0.000022557282,0.99141437,0.004024063,0.0034300175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024790055,0.000059240607,0.0024211332,0.000032002223,0.000028096501,0.0000026800706,0.0019509428,6.8514015e-7,0.00008391754,0.5889305,0.406193,0.000049899492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015754049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002837109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8984696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009858184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030195914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50235814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415222064","doi":"10.1177/14748851251386619","title":"Ethics for endtimes MittigaRoss, <i>Climate Change as Political Catastrophe: Before Collapse</i> , Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2024; 176 pp. ISBN: 9780192868879, £80.00 (hbk)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Politics; Framing (construction); Rhetorical question; Normative; Salient; Scapegoating; Political subjectivity","score_opus":0.02830186352715906,"score_gpt":0.26625637545753567,"score_spread":0.23795451193037662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415222064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2964125,0.0031672413,0.011375685,0.034368563,0.004440074,0.002040808,0.0025950752,0.00031680168,0.6452832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98368233,0.0010378523,0.0019957237,0.0055253953,0.0013917822,0.000005594786,0.000031978034,0.000107877124,0.0062214895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967361,0.0005911719,0.0005684304,0.00035863838,0.0004202458,0.0013254284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800324,0.00066011556,0.00017294622,0.0003622348,0.000087608285,0.0007138332],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020302264,0.00033691028,0.0004342156,0.00009846561,0.00032031984,0.00008889794,0.0007352605,0.00012762615,0.0006468838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006904099,0.0003056896,0.0003392518,0.00024143884,0.0005160744,0.00035848474,0.0006234891,0.000837797,0.00006289202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048348887,0.00020644114,0.0013491323,0.00021757859,0.00010982479,0.00047725253,0.00067685946,0.000046323323,0.00029877917,0.9829915,0.011360005,0.0017827908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029445526,0.0013811631,0.010630761,0.00069592684,0.00042995598,0.00034208997,0.005841371,0.00030441332,0.0016370259,0.028028911,0.94703084,0.00073300005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042148848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005710946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9549626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035635967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059448696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416182264","doi":"10.1177/14748851251394525","title":"Making injustice explicit: The externalist approach to reciprocal elucidation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Reciprocal; Internalism and externalism; Nothing; Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Power (physics); Character (mathematics)","score_opus":0.07613595054703967,"score_gpt":0.3822718594187212,"score_spread":0.3061359088716815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416182264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065519763,0.00026460006,0.10513677,0.0083830785,0.0006271028,0.00008750492,0.0000014424656,0.000015189175,0.87893236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98947793,0.000008778254,0.0009802254,0.0046272627,0.00076238776,0.0000014396003,1.5883113e-7,0.0000073232177,0.0041345092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960625,0.0028878942,0.00036157997,0.00011927302,0.00023471777,0.0003340377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866676,0.00081432355,0.00010868958,0.00014063873,0.00015244863,0.00011710883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063481447,0.00008532681,0.0001536232,0.00008278199,0.00060181244,0.000068331006,0.0005118058,0.000026845826,0.000026054202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002675922,0.00005733517,0.00009008853,0.00020205327,0.00042382043,0.00007301984,0.000117469805,0.0002946125,0.000041891006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009038352,0.000041622956,0.00014493482,0.000009986286,0.000041447183,0.00001947863,0.008672772,0.000004534049,0.000013143733,0.9837263,0.0028037177,0.00443165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007908832,0.000350289,0.051219907,0.00043159394,0.00033886265,0.000108559034,0.17948426,0.000016101485,0.00019139796,0.40506935,0.3616026,0.00039618398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009584074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031306247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98292595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007830906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009366113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46287155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416889579","doi":"10.1177/14748851251394528","title":"Introduction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Contemporary Cultural and Social Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Politics; Section (typography); Decolonization; Anthropocentrism; Mode (computer interface)","score_opus":0.02316784785163569,"score_gpt":0.3130865140632528,"score_spread":0.2899186662116171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416889579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069025524,0.0011811776,0.001449149,0.017921714,0.0026120485,0.000030291149,0.0000013403398,0.00001771094,0.90776104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619626,0.000004698815,0.000030672414,0.0010473197,0.0025750077,1.9418012e-7,2.6193214e-7,0.0000049735368,0.034374293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846363,0.0009655638,0.00026992476,0.000068926165,0.00006663873,0.0001653319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995753,0.00011852779,0.000066535424,0.00007547513,0.000096128424,0.00006801833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010167055,0.000059540635,0.00013177603,0.000048009926,0.000072538496,0.0000135303335,0.00012040435,0.000012557518,0.0008449494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028419745,0.000040789124,0.00010799469,0.00007913445,0.00013328205,0.000043847664,0.0000342149,0.00018442198,0.00022148843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010082663,0.000041344898,0.00015941821,0.000002511011,0.00009942985,0.00006911557,0.0005301482,5.6081507e-8,0.000072737304,0.9290407,0.051388707,0.018495059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060185615,0.00020042264,0.07790352,0.00002653201,0.000056734552,0.00005686204,0.0055337744,7.2681864e-8,0.0000736032,0.14772645,0.767734,0.00008616477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002327658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.715247e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89293706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026431726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000126587565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92516035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417050460","doi":"10.1177/14748851251394535","title":"Reciprocal elucidation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocal; Section (typography); Theme (computing); Representation (politics); Relation (database)","score_opus":0.02597434861584414,"score_gpt":0.3451295648942395,"score_spread":0.3191552162783954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417050460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03779959,0.00013073305,0.008401044,0.0061734463,0.001055658,0.000040635026,7.1975956e-7,0.000026598424,0.94637156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98322564,0.000020534397,0.00062436843,0.0009799104,0.0007048753,1.8617061e-7,1.965875e-7,0.0000054970037,0.014438785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690235,0.0022631036,0.00030979537,0.000066099055,0.00018139798,0.00027727583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990025,0.00054061675,0.00009205298,0.0000802898,0.00014902861,0.0001354808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052592885,0.00005504429,0.00012767602,0.00009772271,0.00019096614,0.000060249964,0.00029989093,0.000026158958,0.00016055972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034339163,0.000044225784,0.00009599407,0.00015567246,0.00037244434,0.00012981823,0.000043435528,0.00017977277,0.00010838009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005832592,0.00002468405,0.00021769249,0.0000037244686,0.00001560781,0.000051347644,0.00046459681,5.821645e-7,0.00003121,0.9771278,0.005188785,0.016815633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031704738,0.00012255562,0.012287435,0.00007545253,0.000032788423,0.000009142891,0.0033743402,0.0000010963065,0.00027364754,0.4765274,0.5068957,0.00008335548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000073539527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003563674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94542605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008872028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015532327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41109666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W835481372","doi":"10.1177/1474885109103846","title":"Review Article: Monarchisms and Republicanisms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriotism; Enlightenment; Religious studies; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.02293685861509972,"score_gpt":0.31663053087756565,"score_spread":0.29369367226246595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W835481372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009640892,0.008312566,0.0022146725,0.028313078,0.00013527073,0.00006839685,0.0000051309776,0.000024272751,0.9512857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734323,0.0012642228,0.0008856019,0.022981955,0.0006104857,9.298122e-8,2.7200616e-7,0.0000055519845,0.0008194989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974708,0.0015188431,0.0003385688,0.000079519654,0.0002472461,0.0003450056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987393,0.0003326975,0.000120866345,0.00009695135,0.00015125846,0.00055894465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003239051,0.00007170657,0.00017230726,0.000040653173,0.0001826316,0.000037975544,0.00019745479,0.000013041788,0.00021122501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016900053,0.000057341465,0.000083230705,0.00009525343,0.001069699,0.00013635836,0.000020798552,0.00020176785,0.000025484751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008870008,0.000027007076,0.000025969252,0.000007998103,0.0000075480693,0.000069351176,0.00014668093,1.03694695e-7,0.000022284463,0.9860506,0.001705118,0.011928483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019499515,0.00026950648,0.003964454,0.00042860114,0.00005668624,0.00022183805,0.00055407773,4.1389293e-7,0.000017483964,0.2098959,0.7842661,0.00012994943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008372954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.420925e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96379143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003949115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030169846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39413503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}