{"meta":{"query_hash":"f86d518ddf40","filters":{"venue":"European Journal of Political Theory"},"cohort_total":49,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":49,"exported":49,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f86d518ddf40","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Journal+of+Political+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W1976512646","doi":"10.1177/1474885110395478","title":"Rosa Luxemburg on disappointment and the politics of commitment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Disappointment; Socialism; Marxist philosophy; Victory; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Allegiance; Democracy; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Communism; Psychology","score_opus":0.044029502078475204,"score_gpt":0.2915546977926234,"score_spread":0.2475251957141482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976512646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08725323,0.015778907,0.0048767086,0.2282829,0.0010267348,0.000034279532,0.00005652041,0.0000471733,0.6626435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585435,0.0019168362,0.00036693312,0.005867966,0.00037720593,0.000042080865,0.000011848926,0.000037231555,0.032836452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996861,0.0021053278,0.00003231781,0.00021462794,0.00035226467,0.0004345501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985753,0.000987348,0.00011945033,0.0000915895,0.00011272449,0.0001135473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026443792,0.0003274263,0.0002939168,0.0007463156,0.006317111,0.0068907766,0.0007000213,0.0029681425,0.0050315615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045009535,0.00016463947,0.00023381347,0.00070147816,0.030325908,0.00563712,0.004330846,0.0049146363,0.0006651968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000857882,0.0000035194646,0.00006012866,0.0000071813233,0.000001115194,0.000044185024,0.005353151,0.000043773907,0.0000346923,0.98890007,0.0040711383,0.0014724226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021117916,0.000024013058,0.00058982224,0.00015949603,0.0000039305696,0.000093353876,0.007953099,0.00022468019,0.00020535316,0.7724194,0.2182858,0.000019936671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065705334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054903207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007973253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007973253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002097573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0578503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978422804","doi":"10.1177/1474885112471273","title":"The shameless truth: Shame and friendship in Aristotle","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Virtue; Friendship; Rhetoric; Moral psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027627970523404124,"score_gpt":0.3015880828776372,"score_spread":0.2739601123542331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978422804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28572062,0.020084312,0.030945662,0.09282623,0.0012947544,0.00002369904,0.000023932429,0.000069160626,0.5690117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99458414,0.0005037365,0.0007726737,0.00088189525,0.00011948878,0.0000051682323,0.0000023049356,0.000008204941,0.0031223593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686605,0.0022695605,0.00005109261,0.00019317286,0.00039167432,0.00022841958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978136,0.0014929444,0.00019167765,0.00016740807,0.00019824745,0.00013616087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003121183,0.00028663484,0.0003701069,0.00063559605,0.0059418017,0.004968137,0.0005193425,0.0036020642,0.0013481504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004749945,0.00018844333,0.000226312,0.0003831599,0.040998895,0.006598931,0.002885576,0.0038871653,0.00025977026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016520988,0.000009384906,0.00016329112,0.000018603589,0.0000037136342,0.000099697696,0.024859212,0.0000880609,0.0001337175,0.97096753,0.0008971035,0.0027431438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009661587,0.000021854892,0.0005272512,0.00005920364,0.000004688217,0.00014993463,0.009252383,0.0003549868,0.00014781098,0.97155994,0.017897721,0.000014444528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090906164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009159301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059418017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019568596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006605381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016506612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996424253","doi":"10.1177/1474885108096962","title":"Demanding Recognition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Politics; Sociology; Identity (music); Variety (cybernetics); Identity politics; Epistemology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Aesthetics; Economics","score_opus":0.1394192579295369,"score_gpt":0.3391767026908409,"score_spread":0.19975744476130397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996424253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02435154,0.00041401028,0.028352521,0.014055752,0.0005153852,0.000046032736,0.000024770405,0.00007641925,0.93216366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85235804,0.0004288815,0.005819942,0.009819954,0.0005397128,0.00012794467,0.00008081314,0.00012504272,0.13069966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99030286,0.0025006775,0.00042520394,0.0017893286,0.0030413962,0.001940503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99338335,0.0019019473,0.0008108055,0.0015201545,0.0013927775,0.0009909964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006416835,0.00047764074,0.00051681366,0.00067117775,0.0058177034,0.0072310385,0.0013718663,0.0049062227,0.017812438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011279435,0.00031533797,0.0006678505,0.0005760976,0.015301208,0.008504988,0.0095826555,0.006988322,0.0054524336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074728864,0.000008537284,0.00017433964,0.00001186231,0.0000013857307,0.000042417087,0.0016917168,0.00005719253,0.00024040844,0.9908276,0.0019860829,0.004950928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017002276,0.00006178154,0.0009965027,0.00010611324,0.0000099784165,0.00041094967,0.0032172166,0.0004658335,0.001098911,0.7518947,0.2416868,0.000034225217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026504453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028136736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017812438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031967452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004567362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059588492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029071836","doi":"10.1177/1474885106064662","title":"The Rise and Fall of Species-Life","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Metaphor; Bourgeoisie; Civilization; Privilege (computing); Depiction; Politics; Liberalism; Ideology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Reading (process); Literature; Epistemology; Law; Art; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.020197837998878716,"score_gpt":0.20764986672197272,"score_spread":0.187452028723094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029071836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10526148,0.012176587,0.024460563,0.07720654,0.0006084822,0.000029014669,0.0000701996,0.000094319956,0.78009284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98396933,0.0010443944,0.00183127,0.0023428723,0.00021690955,0.000028579398,0.000012452415,0.00003858574,0.010515723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954674,0.002819728,0.00006504582,0.00070308027,0.00047123077,0.0004735044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973124,0.0013355061,0.0002527177,0.00049896416,0.00024592428,0.00035442325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004370483,0.00036815103,0.00046790706,0.0016319583,0.005845331,0.007128037,0.0010776914,0.002997679,0.004416686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049159843,0.00021410792,0.0003401262,0.00094920665,0.08206356,0.011132166,0.005328054,0.004089559,0.00047686507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027499505,0.0000019098536,0.000069057736,0.000006063259,0.0000010446458,0.000012257586,0.004668676,0.00001857838,0.000043473665,0.99348277,0.00046438864,0.0012291259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004328024,0.00001201241,0.0003848145,0.000046646644,0.0000014559314,0.00008636036,0.0043025687,0.000100536374,0.00013526468,0.9278609,0.06705874,0.000006190403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024479108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022875594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007128037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044679386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016165399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032417297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039434524","doi":"10.1177/1474885112471267","title":"Sunlight is the best disinfectant? Étienne de la Boétie on corruption and transparency","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Polity; Friendship; Transparency (behavior); Ideal (ethics); Humanism; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Social science","score_opus":0.019083081644728477,"score_gpt":0.30266938366072543,"score_spread":0.28358630201599694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039434524","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0738173,0.04589847,0.009381639,0.52243835,0.0026199142,0.00002725189,0.000053832046,0.00005409699,0.3457091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9536636,0.007719007,0.0008764474,0.01462233,0.0010083471,0.000019177158,0.00000833104,0.000044320208,0.022038447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954478,0.0031124803,0.000053854845,0.0002820081,0.0006562014,0.0004475607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674785,0.0022925502,0.00031566352,0.00014042621,0.00031150936,0.00019194846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034112127,0.00019269784,0.0002971763,0.00051301427,0.0043358225,0.006146621,0.00032112043,0.0024226902,0.0026406932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008045748,0.00013661766,0.00019018633,0.00047657604,0.0135616325,0.0042507285,0.0015280762,0.0037476418,0.00035689116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028259845,0.000012581053,0.0005177107,0.00005057146,0.000007002224,0.00009399425,0.0077455505,0.00020548527,0.00018563995,0.9616439,0.017313337,0.012195941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017862973,0.000040963107,0.00248693,0.00044833843,0.0000138065425,0.00016209087,0.008234068,0.00064707804,0.0006163025,0.54944915,0.43783745,0.00004599206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008829585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008990848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008829585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004774742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022081526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034643292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071164016","doi":"10.1177/1474885108089173","title":"Defenders of Liberal Individualism, Republican Virtues and Solidarity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Solidarity; Politics; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Liberalism; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04785867161284176,"score_gpt":0.3039711138310066,"score_spread":0.25611244221816487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071164016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16650651,0.005878851,0.021569058,0.1053627,0.00048234232,0.000033936645,0.000047828456,0.0000703301,0.7000483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99117905,0.00050698506,0.00089010136,0.0014188959,0.00014012323,0.00001644216,0.0000062777376,0.000010645175,0.0058316016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974159,0.0014976031,0.000041513493,0.00030190838,0.0003296267,0.00041351904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973592,0.0012648897,0.00043720048,0.00034687805,0.00020025337,0.00039161855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039852406,0.00018504534,0.00029906668,0.0009299501,0.003681334,0.005928289,0.0005136257,0.0016580083,0.0022020536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029906072,0.00009613449,0.0003122024,0.00066807773,0.030795824,0.0021885566,0.0030738367,0.0031573225,0.00028922677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030237409,0.0000033415542,0.00016604166,0.0000042315955,0.0000015767052,0.0000097674965,0.0010847927,0.00007387058,0.000014852605,0.9967315,0.00058597967,0.0013209475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000148219415,0.0000132866835,0.001105719,0.00004120608,0.0000039669485,0.00003120658,0.0013307651,0.00036410269,0.00009601748,0.949032,0.047959674,0.0000072756498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026947164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030373484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005928289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037482611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002652526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027195692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080501972","doi":"10.1177/1474885111417777","title":"Friendship and politics in Aristotle’s <i>Nicomachean Ethics</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Politics; Virtue; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Social science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.11921008579805789,"score_gpt":0.26700277128038463,"score_spread":0.14779268548232674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080501972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076159865,0.0073193447,0.011008557,0.014907105,0.00020592197,0.000022871774,0.000026135289,0.00003639678,0.8903138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736676,0.00062498293,0.0014347646,0.00066472066,0.00006834781,0.000026542159,0.0000057816183,0.00001215053,0.023495035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828184,0.0011280787,0.000035689252,0.00016687137,0.00017543042,0.00021216944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996736,0.00014614016,0.00003650832,0.00004721992,0.000058679394,0.000037981987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012605175,0.00019563944,0.00019112654,0.0006120504,0.0083265165,0.003756163,0.00034459485,0.002035407,0.001569492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011306206,0.00016834427,0.00015214483,0.0005619357,0.020164587,0.002840286,0.0017354772,0.0014962286,0.00026443595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025068507,0.0000016495925,0.00007900601,0.0000030223196,4.977911e-7,0.000026532283,0.0035487802,0.000040833747,0.000017072598,0.99472225,0.00055743055,0.0010003409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000851751,0.000013023397,0.0011874178,0.00007032275,0.000004850382,0.00011417635,0.0048003495,0.00048360322,0.00019760044,0.83661175,0.15649405,0.000014250847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02257261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02973043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02257261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062803184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019745831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045567095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090743857","doi":"10.1177/1474885113519259","title":"On the critique of political imaginaries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dialectic; Ideology; Politics; Instrumentalism; Critical theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Critical thought; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04610750725022586,"score_gpt":0.2807263370313409,"score_spread":0.23461882978111506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090743857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018939905,0.025811454,0.020206887,0.3465642,0.0035145623,0.0000337194,0.0000677509,0.000098183016,0.58476335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9180433,0.010606745,0.005061242,0.0283161,0.005287056,0.00016480773,0.00005078704,0.00034478513,0.0321252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984503,0.011016355,0.0002598489,0.0010046829,0.0025306777,0.0006854841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97589433,0.020394884,0.0008672666,0.00091967016,0.0014746956,0.0004492102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011381538,0.0009021324,0.00076220237,0.0036742734,0.009002476,0.01505046,0.0019348669,0.0063749356,0.0037839762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022306565,0.00037991226,0.00060171064,0.002299061,0.08870353,0.013559145,0.006171641,0.01339711,0.00081661786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033793451,0.000002417409,0.000016685864,0.000018406618,0.0000010263518,0.000019877658,0.006094734,0.000041241237,0.000020741094,0.990049,0.002850487,0.0008820633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010518247,0.000006045596,0.00006938079,0.00021975799,0.0000027208555,0.000045272667,0.006620939,0.00018795858,0.00014764312,0.8716913,0.12099089,0.000007537741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027323046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022991332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01505046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009542069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004675403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06923282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092505391","doi":"10.1177/1474885107077311","title":"Struggling over the Meaning of Recognition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Construals; Normative; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Identity (music); Sociology; Subject (documents); Ideal (ethics); Order (exchange); Law; Construal level theory; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08130903967799825,"score_gpt":0.34570405704226786,"score_spread":0.2643950173642696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092505391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045642912,0.009072285,0.043706723,0.3265974,0.001967468,0.000055205688,0.000049545088,0.00008832249,0.5728202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646604,0.002119226,0.0045639146,0.012075717,0.0010806058,0.000108288514,0.000032144835,0.00009378233,0.015265944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96835715,0.018442415,0.0011692334,0.0037981633,0.0055415886,0.0026914342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872944,0.006920826,0.0011367366,0.0017809987,0.0015664084,0.0013007135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024056798,0.00058147643,0.001292381,0.0019546445,0.015293467,0.02029972,0.002624471,0.010953268,0.00433865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023319803,0.0006019567,0.0007323327,0.0016559062,0.14888929,0.03327994,0.013557232,0.017037658,0.0008789197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030930853,0.0000035220098,0.000042271316,0.000007114032,9.54422e-7,0.000012893069,0.0034862983,0.000024760133,0.000021151214,0.99375385,0.00087654596,0.00176752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069500493,0.000009800225,0.00014017016,0.000085024156,0.0000026277871,0.000054777793,0.005301232,0.00012454196,0.000056777608,0.96546626,0.028739234,0.000012722239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042608073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033073747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024056798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010180132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009996204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.127226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093657543","doi":"10.1177/1474885107086449","title":"Locke, Waldron and the Moral Status of 'Crooks'","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Democracy; Classical liberalism; Sociology; Politics; Political philosophy; Liberalism; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.029968225875933247,"score_gpt":0.2830809630001785,"score_spread":0.25311273712424526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093657543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07519786,0.029056791,0.012414909,0.27003437,0.002443222,0.00003740296,0.000051194824,0.00005380143,0.61071044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503098,0.0016067169,0.0011317444,0.017012542,0.00048590766,0.000038968134,0.000008524773,0.00003536876,0.02937046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366695,0.003365432,0.00015665106,0.0005360837,0.0012041769,0.0010706842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961383,0.0024741723,0.00033076035,0.0002752005,0.00044670873,0.00033488942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005712358,0.00026581078,0.0005278101,0.0012515254,0.011841672,0.009461912,0.00095505104,0.0069067124,0.003475779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0146181835,0.0002904595,0.00026899527,0.0009925176,0.048082657,0.0077769742,0.0046946607,0.008121504,0.00038247017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007049211,0.000004065524,0.00008080762,0.000011368688,0.0000010421322,0.00002314153,0.0020335978,0.00002352515,0.000017053635,0.9922178,0.0036527955,0.0019277998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002162401,0.000017518572,0.000614659,0.00018133176,0.0000066266625,0.0000843851,0.0039613848,0.00012321831,0.00014803722,0.84359133,0.15122667,0.000023317223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012578912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019858282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012578912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005366072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048440946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038933754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112317324","doi":"10.1177/1474885106067282","title":"Refiguring the European Union’s Historical Dimension","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Solidarity; Identity (music); Sociology; European integration; Law and economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Political economy; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Politics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02242227356213494,"score_gpt":0.26770628609480795,"score_spread":0.245284012532673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112317324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088802025,0.02686112,0.046438076,0.12492529,0.0028179465,0.00003815367,0.00008446522,0.00007975056,0.7099532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754254,0.0049182335,0.0041894745,0.0050166985,0.00049864553,0.000045612047,0.000034562257,0.00003488709,0.009836613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929772,0.004267995,0.0002579241,0.00088403496,0.000959495,0.0006533074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946524,0.0026979817,0.00055405387,0.0010353528,0.0007265024,0.00033362157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011877327,0.00042141395,0.00045748136,0.0017706411,0.0069315806,0.01448444,0.0012436783,0.004504955,0.002679098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015430688,0.00033924016,0.00032471374,0.0019088048,0.029478773,0.016542407,0.005998274,0.006671876,0.00032668796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026556077,0.0000025239558,0.000082232764,0.000007404649,0.0000017136787,0.0000114869445,0.0015574612,0.000070727685,0.000011157252,0.99517244,0.00052588887,0.002554386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007844119,0.000021473475,0.00071722537,0.00035666174,0.000015375097,0.000085510575,0.0052184006,0.00050238834,0.00019978148,0.78036094,0.21250008,0.000014287757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004073067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048331954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01448444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006380728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042401436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06281406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132993813","doi":"10.1177/1474885109355891","title":"Pascalian Ethics? Bergson, Levinas, Derrida","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Enlightenment; Political philosophy; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Expression (computer science); Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03851814058358267,"score_gpt":0.2570371216788515,"score_spread":0.21851898109526885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132993813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026232457,0.08965003,0.0037100224,0.4314629,0.0022856032,0.000014253267,0.00008549929,0.00005506841,0.4465041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87174124,0.02451398,0.0018297073,0.035300404,0.0025795812,0.000060972827,0.00006372936,0.00010094904,0.063809454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984113,0.0010285609,0.000022451859,0.00014981265,0.00021037422,0.00017743978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998879,0.00062885985,0.0001232778,0.0000690565,0.00019731079,0.00010248627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013092346,0.00032219192,0.00027524447,0.00071897334,0.0027261775,0.004606265,0.00054049975,0.0022757126,0.004980478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003258069,0.0001333156,0.00011986608,0.001121529,0.011908595,0.0038112954,0.0010268302,0.002520671,0.0009481619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007821066,0.000011056979,0.00015976054,0.00003199794,0.0000022163701,0.000031549214,0.0036707362,0.000039299444,0.000028166083,0.95923424,0.030321449,0.006461583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009471448,0.00001005561,0.000869931,0.000234574,0.0000047028893,0.0000882196,0.006175822,0.0002030827,0.00007166726,0.47770208,0.51462024,0.000010275181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013365016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010583168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013365016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051698396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002598622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037509978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139350035","doi":"10.1177/1474885107086444","title":"Modern Natural Law Meets the Market","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Politics; Natural law; Law; Value (mathematics); Economic Justice; Natural (archaeology); Political philosophy; Invisible hand; Adam smith; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Economics; Neoclassical economics; History","score_opus":0.023304266027049787,"score_gpt":0.2802020043281684,"score_spread":0.2568977383011186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139350035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015470888,0.013488383,0.016524859,0.11992572,0.0010136319,0.00002280338,0.000103095714,0.000062630505,0.83338803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8790679,0.0069677536,0.005849733,0.02060851,0.003946157,0.00009323857,0.00006870622,0.00008675619,0.08331137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981401,0.0007617852,0.000045074292,0.00030390595,0.0005222931,0.00022683688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985605,0.0007411225,0.00012871178,0.00022207716,0.0002080313,0.000139619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020586937,0.00027291308,0.0004385185,0.001040482,0.003808447,0.0052184225,0.0005409123,0.0038308527,0.009915214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003134718,0.00020542525,0.0002725036,0.00073749747,0.025964586,0.011195184,0.0026529473,0.003908904,0.001394844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012422405,0.0000024157298,0.000023434866,0.0000047371186,4.4883103e-7,0.000008254239,0.0001337026,0.000038643124,0.000012095802,0.99714005,0.0013397704,0.0012953656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028226941,0.000003781854,0.000054482618,0.000020444371,6.5453565e-7,0.000017105209,0.00014825568,0.00011979942,0.000023128914,0.94409055,0.05551673,0.0000022445238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040533696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038582012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009915214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00521793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003957668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037858844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145251685","doi":"10.1177/1474885113492728","title":"Cosmopolitanism and Hume’s general point of view","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Parochialism; Cosmopolitanism; Epistemology; Morality; Politics; Judgement; Doctrine; Vision; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.042289843328754864,"score_gpt":0.3165846373237098,"score_spread":0.27429479399495493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145251685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052933924,0.016036721,0.04327059,0.08706461,0.0010978765,0.00007658392,0.00009463979,0.00011441067,0.79931056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509372,0.0018008454,0.006817186,0.011449168,0.00082314597,0.00009868924,0.000037247893,0.000067045374,0.02796946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952755,0.0030772868,0.00010931044,0.00060978736,0.0005587743,0.00036935366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963462,0.0021013527,0.00027695365,0.00045395887,0.00047716452,0.00034442008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004192514,0.00043914915,0.00053543056,0.001724757,0.0046284087,0.007225327,0.0012838299,0.0053592124,0.0033357972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055125696,0.0002816815,0.00044979883,0.0009551503,0.04873704,0.006575101,0.0035273551,0.005317764,0.0006489801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035856435,0.000006330368,0.000054373337,0.000014201769,0.0000026137284,0.000029684767,0.0019612345,0.000054874003,0.000023358956,0.99507385,0.0016275205,0.0011484476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009000063,0.000008925086,0.0001375806,0.00005733758,0.0000023177404,0.00008475788,0.0009535067,0.00021024581,0.00008283269,0.9482192,0.05022585,0.000008488233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019543923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019485608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007225327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035642919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017866053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025860906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150150645","doi":"10.1177/1474885114554466","title":"Rawls on the embedded self: Liberalism as an affective regime","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Politics; Passions; Sociology; Enlightenment; Normative; Economic Justice; Public reason; Counterintuitive; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.027020768384057946,"score_gpt":0.3202145593831995,"score_spread":0.29319379099914156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150150645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05363286,0.004702473,0.019478805,0.05758953,0.00059658167,0.000025532981,0.00003833459,0.0000796555,0.8638563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640573,0.0010032636,0.0028047264,0.0052895388,0.00055884547,0.000040421273,0.000011864739,0.000060620638,0.026173359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974039,0.0014438098,0.000046594436,0.00035737548,0.0005364729,0.00021184461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983536,0.0009447115,0.00015113826,0.00024770875,0.00015890657,0.00014399341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025478713,0.00031487955,0.00026050193,0.001027915,0.0036140124,0.0064514363,0.0005874428,0.002490654,0.0036422021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027780926,0.00015489859,0.00045220615,0.0005216206,0.03420018,0.006222401,0.0037225874,0.004672874,0.00067556597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030406588,0.0000044812327,0.000044604538,0.0000049328455,8.2933775e-7,0.00001715537,0.0024758785,0.00005345622,0.000042338845,0.9957021,0.00060771406,0.001043322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004172575,0.000005896772,0.00012391288,0.000020837959,0.0000016927888,0.0000267355,0.0006561121,0.00022487124,0.0000671025,0.9741353,0.02472825,0.000005154108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012696449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010499391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064514363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030830312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011516348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022369087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330365905","doi":"10.1177/1474885113510124","title":"Civil religion and anticlericalism in James Harrington","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Politics; Champion; Spanish Civil War; Battle; Scholarship; Religious studies; Throne; Philosophy; Civil religion; Hebrew; Law; Sociology; Classics; History; Theology; Political science; Ancient history","score_opus":0.01377281530048795,"score_gpt":0.27161805936187494,"score_spread":0.257845244061387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330365905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027511414,0.055238962,0.0023405952,0.24248485,0.0034282997,0.000024144008,0.00004055015,0.000044989876,0.66888624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83325803,0.015228183,0.00092434534,0.034671616,0.0024252287,0.000028917875,0.000012001721,0.000058230387,0.11339341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980422,0.0011077761,0.000036029156,0.00025165876,0.00038285105,0.00017934132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978079,0.001284485,0.00012419304,0.00010177885,0.00029497885,0.00038670134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026039046,0.00020255793,0.00026160403,0.0008618987,0.0092074815,0.005727563,0.0006290586,0.0021581303,0.0040317806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035205248,0.00027287172,0.00011308321,0.0008210588,0.023518683,0.0042509604,0.0022037548,0.0035326115,0.00072037446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012620333,0.000027034346,0.0002555776,0.000032596556,0.0000016702212,0.0001503154,0.017771944,0.000092806,0.00005856848,0.919919,0.05616845,0.005509266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014380836,0.000018396262,0.00077160087,0.00022882523,0.000003124194,0.00022131324,0.015529941,0.00014624871,0.00013534981,0.2578493,0.72505057,0.000031020536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042242542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05635862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042242542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074310694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047953874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083993316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334119050","doi":"10.1177/1474885106067288","title":"Politics and Vision","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.013454200959023485,"score_gpt":0.33799386698984585,"score_spread":0.32453966603082235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334119050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054204003,0.0077115544,0.0016887186,0.029571256,0.0007816613,0.000008874623,0.00006016384,0.000024658197,0.95473284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65333617,0.0052288175,0.0013305886,0.0062512034,0.0012625809,0.000053477328,0.00011324455,0.000077774996,0.3323462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924856,0.00036384814,0.000018247592,0.00013008318,0.00013966912,0.000099504796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999303,0.00027665726,0.000055758614,0.000121408804,0.00011836519,0.00012478033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012396342,0.0002600483,0.00029516246,0.0009516743,0.0030183827,0.00901126,0.00036680035,0.0025553145,0.02973501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029625092,0.00014492718,0.00018714087,0.0010877558,0.009605387,0.004519314,0.0020799243,0.002488,0.0038655482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021622566,0.000003810825,0.00006343892,0.0000043817713,0.0000010425998,0.000005269651,0.0004761908,0.000016510096,0.000012067094,0.9887165,0.0068376707,0.003860936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054771826,0.0000045978363,0.0003783073,0.00003802248,0.000002994581,0.000028786155,0.0009020691,0.00005568789,0.000034387223,0.79638195,0.20216435,0.0000034735694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004681969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005670532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02973501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028849137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020567216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09947348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336740991","doi":"10.1177/1474885115593701","title":"Normative reconstruction without foundation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10095310037372611,"score_gpt":0.3567589533472716,"score_spread":0.25580585297354547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336740991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073594935,0.003072241,0.027352495,0.07561496,0.0042135287,0.000042092754,0.00014594384,0.00016764423,0.8820317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7032255,0.0029998485,0.008554926,0.016256124,0.0071781096,0.0002272916,0.0003637767,0.0005958855,0.2605986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965101,0.001808632,0.00011056983,0.0005788312,0.0006868309,0.0003050411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581015,0.0016940606,0.00015377068,0.0010426717,0.001094111,0.00020522115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057572518,0.00060341373,0.0009179823,0.0016622562,0.0040361946,0.008643295,0.0012036407,0.0046293996,0.02832104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013532244,0.00038118596,0.00069886714,0.0010132428,0.01703982,0.009644426,0.003933916,0.0070433365,0.0043568104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032005955,0.0000037007082,0.000011104819,0.00000698847,0.0000017147865,0.000006793544,0.00020852091,0.000046678186,0.000021213362,0.99235266,0.0054684114,0.0018691355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004662209,0.0000033504048,0.000043537104,0.000038178277,0.000003078838,0.000012051678,0.00024563356,0.0002904089,0.00006049337,0.944801,0.054493677,0.000003874451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021596528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018144491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02832104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050378772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033239836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09474325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2378102969","doi":"10.1177/1474885115608783","title":"Surveillance, freedom and the republic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Liberalism; Presupposition; Sociology; Power (physics); Negative liberty; Law and economics; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036787596995602405,"score_gpt":0.2966084499146628,"score_spread":0.2598208529190604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2378102969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0976156,0.0047962465,0.022679612,0.044470415,0.0002860185,0.00003022312,0.000066325476,0.00006938445,0.8299863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806356,0.00051966525,0.001325174,0.0015445844,0.00009902229,0.00002394174,0.000018466546,0.000019851052,0.015813684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965663,0.0019723703,0.00009844449,0.0005219422,0.00047531902,0.00036559443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660754,0.0017654636,0.00038745912,0.0007403163,0.00026272587,0.00023662663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043267477,0.00016980196,0.00022920361,0.0008281455,0.0040615415,0.0068978677,0.00043110538,0.0019656874,0.0041212905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005800717,0.00017145282,0.00030904173,0.00069116923,0.035057314,0.006046745,0.0041871937,0.0033400722,0.00047115618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003132222,0.0000022659779,0.00011273387,0.000003920101,8.536006e-7,0.000009184986,0.0013681657,0.00006295521,0.000032197397,0.9955764,0.0005816575,0.0022466327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008349664,0.000014622065,0.0006290389,0.000057773224,0.0000033848548,0.00007023016,0.001340836,0.00043587983,0.0002395625,0.91358036,0.08360894,0.000011004478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023082735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017908274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068978677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028693352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002666854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022882283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406239785","doi":"10.1177/1474885114543572","title":"Two concepts of liberal developmentalism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Developmentalism; Enlightenment; Liberalism; Mill; Idealism; Politics; Romanticism; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Cultural imperialism; Historicism; Political philosophy; Classical liberalism; Sociology; Social science; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.10176823972783902,"score_gpt":0.38736851506617587,"score_spread":0.2856002753383369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406239785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01773623,0.006337469,0.07356343,0.05997229,0.0008240726,0.00008334951,0.00013913335,0.00008578986,0.8412582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8730798,0.0035317498,0.034942243,0.011393173,0.0014995829,0.00055166695,0.00013575098,0.00014061788,0.07472544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440444,0.002648531,0.00018871341,0.00082817324,0.0012511717,0.0006788841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935514,0.0031062544,0.0005365281,0.0009868997,0.0010796066,0.00073939696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005229477,0.00051455793,0.00040473917,0.0022871657,0.0032196091,0.006416282,0.0013564186,0.003485943,0.0056081796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011301541,0.00031713335,0.00050960394,0.0014454626,0.036589146,0.007040153,0.0071666418,0.0081837755,0.00095780985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011782296,0.0000025810261,0.00003750058,0.0000036485533,3.089692e-7,0.0000066266102,0.00033466867,0.00002326402,0.000011016121,0.99829763,0.00045614617,0.00082544563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061629194,0.0000048732154,0.00017880416,0.000032705604,0.0000012918167,0.000061707855,0.00041244063,0.00024523732,0.00010067321,0.9492163,0.049734905,0.000004894333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015852457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012618804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007179516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007179516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00402459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05209124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465858461","doi":"10.1177/1474885116653366","title":"Four concepts of rules: A theory of rule egalitarianism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Polity; Capitalism; Classical liberalism; Law and economics; Liberalism; Rule of law; Sociology; Statute; Economic Justice; Law; Just society; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07187380475831448,"score_gpt":0.34295795970887155,"score_spread":0.27108415495055704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465858461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028098898,0.003392416,0.4604506,0.024668923,0.00074667047,0.00020474345,0.0002706015,0.00024570525,0.4819215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83782,0.002158457,0.12201823,0.0045894906,0.00083396875,0.00049093657,0.00023136765,0.00020611948,0.031651348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99208283,0.003068599,0.00044576672,0.0012634719,0.0023610943,0.0007783033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939798,0.0027531388,0.00058476755,0.0014325768,0.0008491833,0.000400544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076447167,0.00058640086,0.00088021404,0.0025371644,0.0037765775,0.009183601,0.002267555,0.0041894647,0.00485958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00970502,0.00048024798,0.0015992252,0.0015022355,0.030800791,0.011093473,0.0044410476,0.0062652547,0.0010745212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020873174,0.0000028401842,0.000029585239,0.000005021762,0.0000015926187,0.000005882748,0.00015232555,0.00015440048,0.000014950407,0.9986021,0.00020714928,0.00082205527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005374943,0.0000040485966,0.000042682597,0.000011323005,0.0000025347795,0.000008749256,0.000042078293,0.00045672484,0.000040496376,0.99243164,0.006950717,0.0000036166073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041267285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020800498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009183601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004873408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041282144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040429592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514638431","doi":"10.1177/1474885116665600","title":"Which conception of political equality do deliberative mini-publics promote?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Politics; Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Inequality; Sociology; Deliberation; Equal opportunity; Law and economics; Egalitarianism; Political science; Political economy; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05475570247945612,"score_gpt":0.3583092928421478,"score_spread":0.3035535903626917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514638431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09340055,0.0038914613,0.35616744,0.07514827,0.000993177,0.00083353446,0.00027368663,0.00021637288,0.46907547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9530296,0.0011466041,0.0340226,0.003919339,0.00042942003,0.0016286493,0.00006606732,0.00012116924,0.0056364946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.89832777,0.0780595,0.0023836682,0.0065625566,0.011199755,0.0034666595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9096791,0.056580212,0.010665889,0.0148168085,0.004460995,0.0037969227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06296511,0.00080333196,0.0016136995,0.003523393,0.0057742293,0.017918805,0.0027592122,0.00544642,0.010887288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11161443,0.000828003,0.0011211685,0.0032371292,0.046626113,0.03395902,0.014798236,0.005761435,0.0019836607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070923044,0.00004641547,0.0012487213,0.00021435111,0.00002249048,0.0000117560785,0.014124458,0.00023779851,0.00012213322,0.9636488,0.00074620114,0.019506052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052316518,0.000094184645,0.0015073755,0.00041963585,0.000030679537,0.0000544996,0.0060603004,0.0006769431,0.00041669095,0.9619372,0.028723901,0.000026246906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062547065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005704736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06296511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005587765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049280184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3329953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529981061","doi":"10.1177/1474885116673546","title":"Freedom without being: Kant’s corrective as the philosophical crux of Agamben’s ‘Homo Sacer’ series","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Subject (documents); State of exception; Relation (database); Epistemology; State (computer science); Autonomy; Politics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023963547000787774,"score_gpt":0.2977983638837159,"score_spread":0.2738348168829281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529981061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043798957,0.014097475,0.05459416,0.13260435,0.002485901,0.000043255925,0.00009612207,0.0001794292,0.7521003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226207,0.00218327,0.009701104,0.010176555,0.001050738,0.00008492294,0.000037356174,0.00015165322,0.053993676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934129,0.0041035595,0.00013875072,0.00062853127,0.0012508103,0.00046537432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976597,0.0014216972,0.00017695368,0.00038109775,0.00022448924,0.00013599337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055966163,0.00058163743,0.00068811147,0.0013988,0.004889652,0.0055018696,0.00094020535,0.005115503,0.0030618545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007673249,0.00033504784,0.00046759876,0.00094059476,0.03735865,0.007958158,0.004379498,0.0086262245,0.00070248963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002936353,0.000001550676,0.000011931398,0.00000464893,7.274279e-7,0.000007926558,0.0009592951,0.000038610127,0.000014869541,0.997029,0.0011614348,0.00076713605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044262447,0.000005054863,0.00005755137,0.000032230757,0.0000020810505,0.000032207343,0.00034195592,0.00018516098,0.000055461533,0.9555108,0.04376585,0.0000072160915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018606475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020042954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055966163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043378407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029362636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031473458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761507624","doi":"10.1177/1474885117735961","title":"What was primitive accumulation? Reconstructing the origin of a critical concept","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Capitalism; Capital accumulation; Context (archaeology); Neoclassical economics; State (computer science); Power (physics); Sociology; Economics; Law; History; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.09934580354544337,"score_gpt":0.40307865158500894,"score_spread":0.3037328480395656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761507624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10784131,0.030171,0.086913526,0.20072134,0.0036631904,0.00014058119,0.00017990901,0.0001737324,0.57019544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974261,0.0044676457,0.0072980695,0.0027731964,0.0008470795,0.00008473247,0.000032598437,0.000101924976,0.010133772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962171,0.0023309432,0.00010277892,0.00050317607,0.00044557548,0.00040045212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937271,0.0041917204,0.00040513423,0.0006960682,0.00064540474,0.00033456585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008466673,0.00067989697,0.00063124707,0.0034160647,0.005876883,0.010247359,0.001194189,0.0027773543,0.0029520362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011717429,0.0003521731,0.00036055327,0.002187985,0.07786268,0.02076024,0.0047373315,0.0075095114,0.00038218295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004552815,0.0000020693735,0.000018358434,0.000009433077,5.158723e-7,0.00001229321,0.002335602,0.00004059962,0.000020987614,0.9961849,0.0004126337,0.00095806905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055656833,0.000006203103,0.000070707785,0.000089429486,0.000001696664,0.000028361104,0.0024490037,0.0002077839,0.000119944794,0.95410895,0.042905428,0.000006951474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003012895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018656373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01136697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01136697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005285196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08247346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766811220","doi":"10.1177/1474885117731941","title":"The two faces of personhood: Hobbes, corporate agency and the personality of the state","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Personhood; State (computer science); Agency (philosophy); Politics; Ambiguity; Epistemology; Sociology; Personality; Social contract; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0684273226156935,"score_gpt":0.26585277960035913,"score_spread":0.19742545698466563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766811220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2520949,0.024236549,0.019450596,0.10900855,0.0013898995,0.000022549026,0.000037748723,0.000035035035,0.5937242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98494244,0.0021735756,0.0012065244,0.0020696896,0.0002709479,0.000014720991,0.0000073612287,0.000011625589,0.009303061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986324,0.0010014188,0.000022340584,0.00008922056,0.00013287258,0.00012174714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990415,0.0005319459,0.00009497329,0.00006967784,0.000060479048,0.0002014671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020953284,0.0002128772,0.00020207527,0.0007058158,0.0037578177,0.005609685,0.00028390312,0.0014852158,0.002158454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017947732,0.00015293536,0.00015492519,0.0006939751,0.029966027,0.0059983963,0.0022697935,0.0022438434,0.00028494388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011771108,0.0000076552615,0.0003218392,0.000010426725,0.0000014299379,0.000046062418,0.022909109,0.000028143513,0.00006657946,0.9714687,0.0016054849,0.0035227453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012771138,0.00003492855,0.0026368839,0.00014842134,0.0000057375923,0.0002757094,0.039738674,0.00032813323,0.00015118843,0.83010286,0.126544,0.000020714642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020922737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025933378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005609685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016245177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007775816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0117868185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795050830","doi":"10.1177/1474885118763881","title":"Beyond the search for the subject: An anti-essentialist ontology for liberal democracy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Essentialism; Political philosophy; Agency (philosophy); Democracy; Normative; Sociology; Criticism; Skepticism; Politics; Subjectivity; Subject (documents); Liberal democracy; Autonomy; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.057851109693580774,"score_gpt":0.38810817835008776,"score_spread":0.330257068656507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795050830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048211105,0.0046130563,0.19691221,0.23292784,0.0013284044,0.00006433967,0.000079232566,0.0001571809,0.51570654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569875,0.0010198494,0.018507568,0.008102196,0.0008251973,0.00015958346,0.0000263451,0.0001361394,0.014235605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99420834,0.0035438817,0.000119613134,0.00058516674,0.0011255561,0.000417506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931318,0.0043486604,0.00046886568,0.0010016157,0.00066179765,0.0003872621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008033674,0.00038615192,0.00062047347,0.0016680126,0.006334409,0.0066502513,0.0013600638,0.0038402684,0.0026558645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081822425,0.00026301102,0.0007553689,0.0009014377,0.06797845,0.010026365,0.005251959,0.008292076,0.00046601062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012554265,0.0000024170608,0.000017994982,0.000003471928,4.1145378e-7,0.0000048976603,0.00065089785,0.00003182463,0.000014595716,0.99849284,0.00029766333,0.00048173562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031266268,0.0000023362702,0.000021071939,0.00001214571,6.77587e-7,0.000009958665,0.00018415476,0.0001345487,0.000037529095,0.98989326,0.009699251,0.000002022799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018240876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022703812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008033674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005596282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050443322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042486668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888301383","doi":"10.1177/1474885118795284","title":"Back to the rough ground: Textual, oral and enactive meaning in comparative political theory","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Orality; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Political philosophy; Political communication; Meaning (existential); Indigenous; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10010465212073977,"score_gpt":0.4157304206856598,"score_spread":0.31562576856492003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888301383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14469469,0.027725317,0.08951763,0.076767035,0.0023453431,0.00013171355,0.00019330122,0.000096985175,0.658528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97585404,0.0030652084,0.010115125,0.0027053102,0.0005515244,0.0001868913,0.00007832237,0.00011395306,0.0073296577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860016,0.0116902,0.00025739777,0.0005921726,0.00103071,0.0004278892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763326,0.019879846,0.0007838878,0.0016105699,0.0008684604,0.0005246244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01171627,0.0005362626,0.0008386093,0.0054670423,0.007398919,0.019896893,0.0016965016,0.0042735916,0.0072588664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03109979,0.000554384,0.0005050034,0.0053937943,0.08859232,0.028372813,0.010401042,0.0066006933,0.0004937645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015521913,0.000009726324,0.00019948548,0.00006615899,0.0000036705446,0.00003874316,0.025778057,0.00009486921,0.00007906951,0.96728086,0.00044928258,0.0059846104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012896712,0.000021600154,0.00043080954,0.00046648906,0.00000955316,0.00008011773,0.027113175,0.0003884231,0.00022667822,0.9451618,0.02607316,0.000015237181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045051044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040039048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019896893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054487037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026639288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061962306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893045664","doi":"10.1177/1474885118799454","title":"Political realism and epistemic democracy: An international perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Democracy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Positivism; International relations; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05384028813508685,"score_gpt":0.37461957835609455,"score_spread":0.3207792902210077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893045664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004163368,0.013185759,0.013625173,0.07756115,0.00094086153,0.000011776202,0.00003122203,0.00003079863,0.8904498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90797925,0.020595722,0.0060319933,0.015489851,0.0058729043,0.00017931087,0.000091345595,0.00015182907,0.04360788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925442,0.00487634,0.00020181462,0.00063432247,0.0009777335,0.0007657051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99202067,0.0059272638,0.0004720296,0.0006444796,0.0005490312,0.00038643836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006473391,0.00063220225,0.0007177879,0.0033319122,0.005674071,0.013923117,0.0011519997,0.006140149,0.009647775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007884006,0.0002796689,0.0007584918,0.0028020514,0.024282038,0.014710198,0.0064546946,0.013316725,0.000876238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011932159,0.0000029309208,0.000011288704,0.000007663097,7.864842e-7,0.000007799207,0.00024915405,0.000043821557,0.000007532509,0.9985234,0.00045891106,0.00068542996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005879263,0.000006807134,0.00009427477,0.00016013022,0.0000049808655,0.0000478276,0.00087629183,0.0003053093,0.00005237952,0.9281727,0.0702677,0.000005688192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013202847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089942245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013923117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058717174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002690139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04260248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922264105","doi":"10.1177/1474885119834760","title":"Bergson contra Bergson: Race and morality in <i>The Two Sources</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Reactionary; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Race (biology); Subject (documents); Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01765464601363614,"score_gpt":0.22929004603121766,"score_spread":0.21163540001758152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922264105","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01613995,0.06272599,0.0063212886,0.5406045,0.0074367323,0.00002596843,0.000070198796,0.000057820882,0.36661762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7628563,0.022325175,0.003948813,0.07364173,0.005877231,0.00014927197,0.00007036613,0.00028254348,0.13084857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965263,0.0021852904,0.00007307495,0.00038198894,0.0005425001,0.0002907765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536633,0.0031486682,0.00046790243,0.00017108281,0.0005623468,0.00028372332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024278944,0.0005252115,0.00046482807,0.0012874993,0.0061801192,0.009305295,0.0011404695,0.0047449856,0.0061814785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077175,0.00030861804,0.0002909814,0.0016985607,0.020084491,0.009681355,0.0023387147,0.007240958,0.0011046897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022226837,0.000011937812,0.00017918309,0.00007692536,0.0000044793874,0.00006261555,0.008289583,0.00007112547,0.000055344735,0.91998637,0.0644952,0.006744938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017092807,0.000023823459,0.00078737363,0.00070626277,0.000013550115,0.00025423896,0.014407069,0.0003165342,0.00024969046,0.42209035,0.56110144,0.000032626034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012317297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012206683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012317297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006364665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044054845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046179056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940952508","doi":"10.1177/1474885119843116","title":"“I tremble with my whole heart”: Cicero on the anxieties of eloquence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of Glasgow","keywords":"Cicero; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Persuasion; Ethos; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Literature; Epistemology; Sociology; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02664706967549112,"score_gpt":0.2846821906684124,"score_spread":0.25803512099292125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940952508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069652624,0.010932004,0.009324672,0.16783677,0.0017358267,0.000056240242,0.000033991862,0.000082749444,0.7403451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491842,0.0023130507,0.0015300569,0.01216128,0.0011263377,0.00007778759,0.000012370316,0.000094912604,0.033499952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934273,0.0041846046,0.00009104574,0.0006609259,0.0011677652,0.00046834856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911964,0.006633265,0.00045932957,0.00048731308,0.00081963104,0.00040405642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008143182,0.00059869845,0.0006242322,0.0021199742,0.014927939,0.011813978,0.0011833366,0.00410028,0.0024647731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019721603,0.0003109975,0.00030382062,0.00106927,0.042565808,0.009513216,0.00454919,0.008427119,0.0006303618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025738746,0.000010847144,0.0001668363,0.000038368617,0.0000038167836,0.0001374712,0.054478463,0.00008644473,0.00007553122,0.9285868,0.0102385525,0.0061510694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053378888,0.00005596418,0.00095638714,0.00041485004,0.000021725917,0.0003349516,0.029435193,0.0008243672,0.0006272885,0.591473,0.37575212,0.000050790768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0099238455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060972874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014927939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007870832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043721725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05710721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981072376","doi":"10.1177/1474885119881313","title":"Radical republicanism and solidarity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Solidarity; Elite; Social order; Sociology; Law and economics; Power (physics); Law; Political economy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.018432517933243044,"score_gpt":0.29537147530430125,"score_spread":0.2769389573710582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981072376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.317995,0.0031244233,0.023176195,0.03948257,0.00039568605,0.00005407255,0.000034691453,0.00006281385,0.61567456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985474,0.00026649437,0.0007171495,0.0009306449,0.000057592468,0.000014191708,0.00000644267,0.000012010097,0.012521559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805593,0.0009741435,0.000036704932,0.00028017123,0.00024605248,0.00040701547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992343,0.0003285944,0.00013493231,0.00012999252,0.00009179689,0.00008026331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028565247,0.00020009931,0.00023077126,0.0005506594,0.005372706,0.0028746868,0.00046715344,0.0013995696,0.0032263524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020361063,0.00009915783,0.0002579368,0.0004537565,0.02662315,0.0031781346,0.003950494,0.0024532834,0.00040904986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004052838,0.000005848411,0.00009975887,0.0000058786745,0.0000011861965,0.000026128675,0.0064612627,0.00008027004,0.000070541566,0.9911972,0.00040436306,0.0016436145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017973294,0.000028057653,0.0005432128,0.000042045845,0.0000034378543,0.000074554446,0.005100465,0.00045936197,0.00038770313,0.88925034,0.10408087,0.000011973058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002180878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024531644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005372706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041413205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015925969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030047476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158103079","doi":"10.1177/14748851211009206","title":"Hannah Arendt, antiracist rebellion, and the counterinsurgent logic of the social","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Gender studies; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.039838011889816206,"score_gpt":0.3184187428695511,"score_spread":0.27858073097973485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158103079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12738971,0.009504267,0.0061535193,0.19883333,0.0010844549,0.000035491455,0.000031950854,0.000035024816,0.6569322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718794,0.0007894773,0.0006820248,0.0062995856,0.00020536027,0.00003341428,0.000006715534,0.000017041426,0.020086797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977145,0.0015614053,0.000022586166,0.00017422083,0.0002661282,0.00026107067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900335,0.0006029387,0.000102958315,0.00007763419,0.0000905603,0.00012254596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021482164,0.0002302517,0.000192903,0.0008271738,0.0077564246,0.004007839,0.00067617494,0.0028734242,0.0026211343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026568638,0.00013917641,0.00022157838,0.00052607624,0.031228833,0.0028602553,0.0022581117,0.0034484332,0.00022689102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004358243,0.000008219648,0.000119125696,0.00000715226,0.0000015297207,0.000022585278,0.0073097213,0.000039580264,0.00002660988,0.9875709,0.0036367164,0.0012535041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022398597,0.000023761011,0.001133495,0.00013405633,0.000007706461,0.0000887871,0.0119497925,0.00051088136,0.00026820027,0.78710103,0.19874589,0.000014051923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076224613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010415286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077564246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060056164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025272197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043573976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W363386269","doi":"10.1177/1474885115584834","title":"The ethics of deportation in liberal democratic states","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Democracy; Discretion; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Immigration; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10535913184218394,"score_gpt":0.37790406473357147,"score_spread":0.27254493289138754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W363386269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15224136,0.0034309214,0.08440156,0.08871143,0.00047528738,0.00014254093,0.00006929277,0.00012720034,0.6704005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795482,0.00035113186,0.0037938592,0.0034934173,0.00011252229,0.00011587511,0.000009999769,0.00003289139,0.012542012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96475774,0.023716705,0.0011075636,0.002932165,0.0037386508,0.0037471498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899832,0.005439616,0.00089658995,0.002091259,0.0010728291,0.0005165099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01708925,0.00035651235,0.00049801223,0.0007156695,0.012925217,0.010831484,0.001315421,0.006578073,0.0019538603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01692374,0.0005116755,0.000651806,0.0010310516,0.056471877,0.005370721,0.0101262955,0.00899952,0.00042091412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003361828,0.000003053629,0.00010343134,0.0000059037834,0.0000017805834,0.00001898677,0.002250507,0.00017988976,0.000034318193,0.99626654,0.00033769323,0.0007944837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013301699,0.000010871575,0.00021452425,0.00006303044,0.0000050387794,0.00004126784,0.0014885212,0.000554357,0.00023001179,0.9614215,0.03594239,0.000015283349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073467926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006009531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01708925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007967451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009287565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09037769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200206011","doi":"10.1177/14748851211065132","title":"Moral proximity and the territorial imperative","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Meaning (existential); Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Moral order; Moral imperative; Law; Control (management); Sociology; Business; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.017760603647359357,"score_gpt":0.2897067733291391,"score_spread":0.2719461696817797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200206011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07682689,0.0069128093,0.027394334,0.2002255,0.0014576877,0.00004722305,0.000046322082,0.00006594887,0.6870233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752807,0.00075726333,0.0018800691,0.00927672,0.000322523,0.00005469868,0.000009138399,0.000029271505,0.012389656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260193,0.0054992116,0.00011252146,0.00069417135,0.00050687365,0.00058525015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967692,0.0018461071,0.00030646657,0.00029603505,0.00039570258,0.00038652544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004391465,0.00030019504,0.00036959985,0.0006529363,0.009653144,0.0067837248,0.0010017786,0.0050803456,0.0044266987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006339348,0.00024225847,0.0004890143,0.0006915221,0.061607968,0.008623763,0.007898981,0.0082316315,0.0004680969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004853198,0.0000032937112,0.00006475209,0.000015853055,0.0000010986112,0.000028740333,0.008200362,0.00006272474,0.00002767114,0.9894036,0.0013752052,0.0008117484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024309767,0.000038463877,0.00069644535,0.0002072134,0.000009035047,0.00016763904,0.026552698,0.0004730612,0.00014347736,0.7962252,0.1754363,0.000026176109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004400073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005270646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009653144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047481777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031871884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03445065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207030675","doi":"10.1177/14748851211073728","title":"The household in Isocrates’ political thought","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ruler; Politics; Elite; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Metaphor; Positive economics; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0433048917237659,"score_gpt":0.31102145708512435,"score_spread":0.26771656536135846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207030675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3437082,0.0019577183,0.0052074525,0.00727978,0.00019818117,0.00003256739,0.000020937921,0.000036789872,0.64155835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918751,0.0001446599,0.00017223657,0.0002016236,0.000031168343,0.000006285442,0.0000036315025,0.000007735931,0.007557551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738055,0.0017179652,0.000034891415,0.0002027982,0.0002031635,0.00046061323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994093,0.00024620575,0.00009540267,0.00007538915,0.000072495925,0.00010123236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022719651,0.00023013778,0.00023495116,0.0012993148,0.008823395,0.0054961774,0.0005264362,0.0010111241,0.0040503964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001510402,0.00015693805,0.00016882428,0.001069917,0.0365071,0.0034574578,0.003285062,0.0015486003,0.00031660558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009157143,0.0000090477315,0.0004974051,0.000008329701,0.0000013458733,0.000060544444,0.04584605,0.00005349881,0.000039437768,0.95124346,0.00056622585,0.0016654249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000560718,0.000057908514,0.0074725053,0.00016955906,0.00001529403,0.0002511821,0.23343365,0.0012178462,0.00033981612,0.43327823,0.32368097,0.000027035383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016379416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017053572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016379416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007227629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021717264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052440345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214910169","doi":"10.1177/14748851221077564","title":"Reply to my critics","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Injustice; State (computer science); Dimension (graph theory); Duty; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.024102881244382406,"score_gpt":0.31470794419758197,"score_spread":0.29060506295319954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214910169","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001185192,0.0007179239,0.00008952964,0.9694979,0.028142761,0.0000052561563,0.000018291734,0.000026275118,0.0013835937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028256334,0.00044441642,0.00015556566,0.97275734,0.017883832,0.00003662871,0.000014436395,0.000059481597,0.0058227186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852998,0.0045382283,0.0009175961,0.002325102,0.004937351,0.0019820426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952956,0.020834055,0.00219894,0.0019606352,0.016951837,0.0050985245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016386623,0.0015953212,0.0021469032,0.0017020118,0.011154965,0.013421863,0.0053669475,0.049626097,0.010560638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11248327,0.0009404531,0.0017551817,0.0018710588,0.013248574,0.010604375,0.007947068,0.10846009,0.0082381815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000083073455,0.0000074978866,0.00009064457,0.00002378038,0.0000044142207,0.00009713805,0.00047173022,0.00001947677,0.000026105685,0.003897071,0.99379444,0.0015592996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017354812,0.000015660102,0.00030830724,0.0003266438,0.00001342449,0.0002846621,0.0038805322,0.0001394785,0.0001308772,0.006350192,0.9884814,0.00005145711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061763837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006449511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049626097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077512776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008969193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086661816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230886526","doi":"10.1177/1474885117718371","title":"Contra politanism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Teleology; Personhood; Sovereignty; Politics; Political philosophy; State (computer science); Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); State of nature; Sociology; Social contract; Moral agency; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06216706977571082,"score_gpt":0.27363641230366903,"score_spread":0.2114693425279582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230886526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052727773,0.0035986407,0.020605156,0.06646848,0.001843163,0.000027919721,0.00017129215,0.00013104724,0.90188146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6432551,0.0036542725,0.010372976,0.045859706,0.004415107,0.00033918643,0.00033050863,0.00045842407,0.29131475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966106,0.0013062429,0.00007947262,0.0010554998,0.00054041407,0.00040777016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858296,0.00051195256,0.00014703335,0.0004155099,0.00023653173,0.00010598823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030277674,0.0006530437,0.0005231171,0.0011758202,0.0038104772,0.0065458203,0.0010252675,0.0030098052,0.018131888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046764305,0.00021136033,0.0006156053,0.00080560404,0.021202026,0.008168544,0.0047948505,0.008384877,0.003723051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021854562,0.0000015495299,0.000032456875,0.000007829563,0.0000016189175,0.000006050517,0.00031486183,0.000023478733,0.000009660183,0.9962637,0.002296407,0.0010402155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008264417,0.000008370995,0.000121645615,0.00007178296,0.000004600302,0.000053198964,0.00068974396,0.00016502138,0.000085772226,0.7445607,0.25422603,0.0000048567326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039385003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004674848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018131888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003908573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023164703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060657203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383736014","doi":"10.1177/14748851231185223","title":"Democratic politics and hope: An Arendtian perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Normative; Epistemology; Sociology; Political philosophy; Narrative; Perspective (graphical); Action (physics); Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044276841479169424,"score_gpt":0.34654224200448225,"score_spread":0.3022654005253128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383736014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04210838,0.01034103,0.022508834,0.1034834,0.0009618756,0.000060525672,0.000035196797,0.00006001578,0.82044065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769604,0.0020442065,0.0018729599,0.0029103197,0.00055042683,0.000069957234,0.000012118904,0.000021701771,0.015557947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533314,0.0030418609,0.00008424015,0.00029767398,0.0007231688,0.0005199134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763405,0.0015700553,0.00022507425,0.00018876526,0.00016639628,0.00021555694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055102855,0.0003585983,0.0003338849,0.001454326,0.008069133,0.0074849296,0.00076102914,0.0033213876,0.0022914351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049914075,0.00023867503,0.00045378486,0.0010608663,0.049918685,0.006750452,0.0044240286,0.006668053,0.00030015013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016212543,0.0000027491287,0.000024122031,0.0000049954156,7.017036e-7,0.000010068772,0.0027234007,0.000028700555,0.000009428502,0.9960723,0.0005787317,0.00054314034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010158762,0.0000107037895,0.00015498871,0.000055986486,0.0000030865097,0.00004895949,0.0035601656,0.00022661428,0.000063615604,0.92992663,0.06593181,0.000007211353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020730412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025122962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008069133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052103614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003084302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037803948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385325580","doi":"10.1177/14748851231186702","title":"Corruption and political institutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Mandate; Language change; Democracy; Institution; Bureaucracy; Political science; Public institution; Public administration; Power (physics); Political corruption; Hierarchy; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.1296851289412882,"score_gpt":0.38588446142991,"score_spread":0.2561993324886218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385325580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057486556,0.010872251,0.02975403,0.07447428,0.00049827277,0.00009162188,0.00010055998,0.000113194255,0.82660913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96901345,0.0030705528,0.0022256486,0.004033603,0.00041690955,0.000103667684,0.000038583188,0.00004595753,0.02105166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910692,0.004725227,0.00023696145,0.0008646921,0.0013566805,0.0017472033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99061954,0.004642096,0.0019620615,0.0011137817,0.0009414191,0.0007210783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006361017,0.00029069165,0.0004623695,0.0016963418,0.005604538,0.0104880715,0.0006846442,0.0037864216,0.004816701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01326114,0.00029647505,0.00038820767,0.0018911896,0.031087887,0.006373389,0.00487794,0.004551501,0.0007828563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018400299,0.0000026799046,0.00013353796,0.000006107016,0.0000018447597,0.0000069078187,0.00026931817,0.00018932948,0.000012252163,0.99785256,0.00056491385,0.00095863506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010874207,0.000007304881,0.00047025323,0.00006194061,0.0000046352566,0.000020148833,0.00033966816,0.00040606575,0.00005994668,0.9643976,0.03421481,0.0000067523097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037368042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020692202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104880715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007183347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006065963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052119076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385660671","doi":"10.1177/14748851231192776","title":"The retrieval of positive freedom, post-Kantian perfectionism and neo-Roman liberty in contemporary political thought","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Perfectionism (psychology); Classical liberalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Liberalism; Environmental ethics; Agnosticism; Negative liberty; Scholarship; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04850845939536583,"score_gpt":0.3237251058457488,"score_spread":0.275216646450383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385660671","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045405027,0.59851426,0.012743576,0.06455562,0.010869085,0.00004522866,0.00030808794,0.00021245512,0.2673467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6559989,0.2788111,0.004634408,0.009273811,0.015746357,0.000106175714,0.00038529345,0.00036183876,0.034682076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976477,0.0011962781,0.000104101855,0.00020554593,0.0007380051,0.000108501816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927409,0.00552056,0.00047416688,0.000611163,0.00045385168,0.00019935328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037517636,0.0003952542,0.000794205,0.0066419467,0.0020984963,0.0091379555,0.0007030275,0.0014590069,0.004338368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010386834,0.00017853106,0.00025633714,0.004719572,0.019725794,0.010266596,0.003708627,0.0029985583,0.00066021556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006708224,0.00001317268,0.00045846458,0.0021936358,0.000031850737,0.000120366894,0.03673487,0.00022124572,0.0004303965,0.81449074,0.029754123,0.11548401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014362051,0.000036062866,0.0033028906,0.0046393075,0.000043115524,0.0005313798,0.015712192,0.00021750486,0.0008464928,0.39769778,0.5769166,0.00004243332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015217403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025550225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091379555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003411114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035401224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024749458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388832958","doi":"10.1177/14748851231214252","title":"How many worlds are there? One, but also many: Decolonial theory, comparison, ‘reality’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Politics; Sociology; Multiculturalism; Thriving; Field (mathematics); Relativism; Diversity (politics); Scope (computer science); Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Social science; Political science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07819730367818835,"score_gpt":0.3514237583419059,"score_spread":0.2732264546637176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388832958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078458145,0.046429582,0.08816263,0.24711886,0.0032288537,0.00011259762,0.00017942363,0.00012673269,0.5361832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703279,0.005018394,0.010485322,0.0052306405,0.00067965727,0.00019776965,0.00007901885,0.00010547725,0.0078757685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97598493,0.018957237,0.00041841393,0.002119186,0.0017465815,0.00077368796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99006224,0.0064227893,0.00083993946,0.0012222831,0.00068859104,0.00076414074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014732919,0.00087023474,0.0012739348,0.0034225446,0.0120297605,0.022843484,0.0023045384,0.003971353,0.0043319585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015387448,0.00049648865,0.000679026,0.0038568343,0.12790778,0.042045597,0.011943922,0.0077970815,0.00056286197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061130904,0.0000068127615,0.00012482704,0.000034043704,0.0000039166484,0.000022562348,0.011139744,0.000030310388,0.000022769034,0.9841372,0.0012464819,0.003225252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006116897,0.000009554708,0.00017881853,0.00010979791,0.0000053939334,0.000054349868,0.016497882,0.00012706887,0.00004722683,0.9483263,0.034627687,0.000009681665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037870544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003806591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022843484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008456283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047093914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077916026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407984527","doi":"10.1177/14748851251314735","title":"Hamilton's fear: Republican judicial review and the separation of complicit powers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Separation of powers; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01999780710642225,"score_gpt":0.3334159596771743,"score_spread":0.31341815257075206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407984527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04523432,0.00466716,0.014686345,0.5190655,0.0008180945,0.00009822963,0.00007143298,0.00010684285,0.41525206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89822674,0.0012285109,0.0013585853,0.06754711,0.000872896,0.00005872943,0.000013804682,0.000056626242,0.030636948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853872,0.0050899033,0.00038406282,0.0017635436,0.0048857788,0.0024894343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976384,0.01707756,0.0016664482,0.0018295442,0.0022663195,0.00077615376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012034856,0.00025752178,0.0005930931,0.0011443147,0.0083194,0.009725219,0.0014311819,0.00931373,0.00554777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03674806,0.00050312094,0.0005974023,0.0014504844,0.035344157,0.007829871,0.0046730316,0.011907031,0.000668428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001530973,0.000006156511,0.00021952912,0.000013547252,0.000005014453,0.000054633343,0.0015705575,0.000086612614,0.000086311156,0.9834557,0.01061448,0.0038720327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006854317,0.000023471583,0.001264972,0.00008348782,0.000022634029,0.00011667429,0.0014034101,0.00088020205,0.0003911968,0.91549903,0.08020087,0.000045519257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07457652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072168365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07457652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015613285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017510625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14828491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409982317","doi":"10.1177/14748851251337317","title":"The unbearable lightness of servitude: Étienne de la Boétie and the fragility of freedom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fragility; Philosophy; Lightness; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.011420913250980972,"score_gpt":0.24118129092060284,"score_spread":0.22976037766962187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409982317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052768797,0.027001375,0.0064795804,0.2506126,0.001970542,0.000023709275,0.000030593405,0.0000454987,0.6610673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9115688,0.004822352,0.0013710477,0.024286937,0.001128148,0.000055923774,0.000015894348,0.00006227507,0.056688588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637526,0.0022241466,0.000041213087,0.00029162574,0.00045779956,0.0006100051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740285,0.0017345505,0.0001834861,0.00017167286,0.00022949922,0.00027796006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047236052,0.00030753398,0.00036046375,0.0010752185,0.010191497,0.009395923,0.00059209816,0.004433715,0.0022526905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044593066,0.00027861766,0.00030530058,0.0008325093,0.05026138,0.006152686,0.00396157,0.008560083,0.00042755483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059167946,0.00000731526,0.00007925278,0.0000061700266,9.027805e-7,0.000023885947,0.0075350082,0.00004568185,0.000016676635,0.9868674,0.0043219184,0.0010898791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016934466,0.000014243233,0.0004464051,0.00015520708,0.0000032246287,0.000089318106,0.0074437796,0.00024940431,0.00009450657,0.6681317,0.323331,0.000024313062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013223419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010693051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013223419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00716711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038013814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052001297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414629946","doi":"10.1177/14748851251380542","title":"The retrieval of liberal socialism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Creed; Normative; Socialism; Classical liberalism; Politics; Political philosophy; Theme (computing)","score_opus":0.017466658382633417,"score_gpt":0.29438701943591816,"score_spread":0.27692036105328477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414629946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027728548,0.0036006037,0.010598206,0.06405045,0.0015229334,0.000021086968,0.00021521345,0.00013221995,0.89213085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9073937,0.0023724665,0.0024065673,0.008935119,0.001596287,0.000042676565,0.00024433242,0.0003964568,0.07661239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944351,0.003071889,0.00016858846,0.00056021445,0.0013109645,0.00045328325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98801756,0.0068090875,0.0006125652,0.0025356363,0.0015312894,0.0004938815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055423533,0.00031685893,0.0006150473,0.0020132037,0.005066013,0.0112375645,0.0009940284,0.0028445038,0.020127472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028179616,0.0003428243,0.00033340685,0.0021307617,0.03989185,0.01719707,0.007953269,0.005632607,0.0038775285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012602508,0.000004902788,0.000094609895,0.000034899767,0.000002183387,0.000045650468,0.007699937,0.000035812744,0.000076122466,0.9765879,0.009521382,0.005883978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010568093,0.000007756812,0.00021046255,0.00009511139,0.0000028112765,0.00009772234,0.0037285716,0.0001325199,0.00021293144,0.84128016,0.15421218,0.000009347021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037787023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003577145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020127472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008278564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004264088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0673331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415222064","doi":"10.1177/14748851251386619","title":"Ethics for endtimes MittigaRoss, <i>Climate Change as Political Catastrophe: Before Collapse</i> , Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2024; 176 pp. ISBN: 9780192868879, £80.00 (hbk)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Politics; Framing (construction); Rhetorical question; Normative; Salient; Scapegoating; Political subjectivity","score_opus":0.02830186352715906,"score_gpt":0.26625637545753567,"score_spread":0.23795451193037662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415222064","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024201104,0.5559987,0.0055132257,0.2247993,0.014282286,0.000030050476,0.0001556285,0.00020550095,0.19659524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07687774,0.2888281,0.0077711935,0.04713408,0.009601292,0.00013326254,0.00041493349,0.0005944282,0.56864494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992041,0.0003880537,0.000042929958,0.000071151364,0.00023436538,0.000059365506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903595,0.00063025317,0.000086383676,0.000042448006,0.00012261026,0.00008232096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094978436,0.0006443205,0.00026432428,0.0007390604,0.0014799569,0.004849325,0.0005604046,0.0025160895,0.017091924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029028433,0.00037757566,0.00029992816,0.0010352116,0.002883836,0.006210179,0.0011209458,0.003908028,0.0061335615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019566005,0.000018245752,0.00014594576,0.00034724467,0.0000067711426,0.00008331853,0.0023428032,0.0001801205,0.00031603198,0.12020852,0.8184436,0.0578879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024647813,0.0000042638726,0.0002490164,0.00021975074,0.0000025196514,0.000078581514,0.0007418626,0.00007618894,0.00008475872,0.020879332,0.9776552,0.000006148643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004576911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010170594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017091924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015477305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002459887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0571782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416182264","doi":"10.1177/14748851251394525","title":"Making injustice explicit: The externalist approach to reciprocal elucidation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Externalism; Reciprocal; Internalism and externalism; Nothing; Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Power (physics); Character (mathematics)","score_opus":0.07613595054703967,"score_gpt":0.3822718594187212,"score_spread":0.3061359088716815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416182264","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041059386,0.0025484804,0.48271102,0.06907977,0.00077886507,0.0002665108,0.000060831255,0.00027222588,0.40322295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94983906,0.0007167152,0.030023335,0.004014628,0.0002969941,0.0003588889,0.000027660713,0.0001866891,0.0145359235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9555619,0.035675053,0.0008550235,0.002909392,0.0036249098,0.0013737949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772176,0.014253858,0.002217486,0.0041890466,0.001464153,0.0006577686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02418785,0.0008283566,0.00086217106,0.0016267116,0.007311366,0.015314615,0.0029946093,0.0077940985,0.0053228587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026465874,0.00070300867,0.0011481269,0.0007977894,0.078745954,0.021516437,0.017887248,0.010590256,0.0009534476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012676419,0.000012000877,0.00011406766,0.000043890017,0.000008296988,0.00009388714,0.015203525,0.000157773,0.00025548885,0.98096263,0.00036997983,0.0027657351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019277186,0.000022232005,0.00012186462,0.00014626961,0.000016764096,0.00023351963,0.005124372,0.0010724772,0.0008469171,0.95620185,0.036168564,0.000025773643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011453491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085723144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02418785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050195064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004048126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12791908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416889579","doi":"10.1177/14748851251394528","title":"Introduction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Contemporary Cultural and Social Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Politics; Section (typography); Decolonization; Anthropocentrism; Mode (computer interface)","score_opus":0.02316784785163569,"score_gpt":0.3130865140632528,"score_spread":0.2899186662116171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416889579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012753581,0.0063072247,0.0065554124,0.021812934,0.02226657,0.00031995925,0.0069059385,0.0015348805,0.93302184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009510512,0.0068614935,0.0047883997,0.009675158,0.0059182467,0.00035914298,0.008524465,0.0007241257,0.95363855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876344,0.00017482114,0.000073636314,0.00029185563,0.0005542362,0.00014205716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781173,0.000452517,0.0001019195,0.00020161769,0.0011083253,0.00032391463],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010577227,0.0008014273,0.000606332,0.0013814719,0.001956896,0.0055201454,0.0019385814,0.0027618757,0.46389887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061357045,0.00036161297,0.00055591535,0.0013732512,0.0008495569,0.003680981,0.00256328,0.0026117642,0.3153925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028597362,0.00003420702,0.00024367085,0.00018275024,0.0000023737311,0.00007245611,0.00029429223,0.00009702267,0.00015059716,0.034777686,0.8913089,0.072807424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020774116,0.000009403481,0.00016516574,0.00009990941,7.2899184e-7,0.000057301684,0.0000940815,0.000021957007,0.000030368072,0.003524366,0.9959912,0.0000036423355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026427698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024387492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5361011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019454446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002245937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7646832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417050460","doi":"10.1177/14748851251394535","title":"Reciprocal elucidation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocal; Section (typography); Theme (computing); Representation (politics); Relation (database)","score_opus":0.02597434861584414,"score_gpt":0.3451295648942395,"score_spread":0.3191552162783954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417050460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043291587,0.012275896,0.13708743,0.2839276,0.011743932,0.0002581596,0.00018609707,0.00045352778,0.5107758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89640313,0.0027606403,0.01566505,0.014212598,0.0018420106,0.00038228603,0.00009267694,0.0005110184,0.06813058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96198136,0.027265903,0.0008182409,0.0031985713,0.0044623557,0.0022736394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96864355,0.017720154,0.0018516463,0.00640037,0.00411219,0.0012720821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030692454,0.0008666286,0.0009512645,0.0015833533,0.010552445,0.010812404,0.0031097117,0.0049717636,0.010990508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05137297,0.00041280422,0.00091198785,0.0015368427,0.03740285,0.020121567,0.024765546,0.012790458,0.0016986779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035257446,0.000016735159,0.00014901142,0.00012565909,0.000010248482,0.000119273034,0.07587353,0.00009376627,0.00049117336,0.89727396,0.013180344,0.012631037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016938022,0.00003507522,0.0001864482,0.00031945732,0.00001748126,0.0002514105,0.05259304,0.00047775658,0.001233532,0.4530651,0.49176985,0.0000339997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001689742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023045342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030692454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005523725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005688884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16231918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W835481372","doi":"10.1177/1474885109103846","title":"Review Article: Monarchisms and Republicanisms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriotism; Enlightenment; Religious studies; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.02293685861509972,"score_gpt":0.31663053087756565,"score_spread":0.29369367226246595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W835481372","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000084366926,0.99342406,0.00002274552,0.0032376624,0.0014046071,0.0000018679013,0.000023715587,0.0000018451152,0.0017990307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018734036,0.9930548,0.000025893374,0.0010858695,0.0029413025,0.000004367682,0.000044655717,0.0000015899565,0.0009681195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994998,0.00019600874,0.000041397518,0.00008913435,0.00011586108,0.0000579251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983234,0.001022432,0.00022330105,0.00003953831,0.0002397483,0.00015161208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008577589,0.0009271199,0.0016977984,0.0018775387,0.0006419671,0.0028014,0.0016884257,0.0034317935,0.017290695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00392782,0.00025416462,0.00046601042,0.0062712305,0.0015409272,0.0028668274,0.0012508169,0.0023323107,0.0035394903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010357111,0.000048126283,0.00042083897,0.020086998,0.0002464316,0.00025750627,0.00026746863,0.00044156407,0.00014440165,0.020586517,0.5749295,0.38246706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004731523,0.000039613664,0.0032378852,0.012877017,0.00018207417,0.0006389628,0.00036997668,0.000081497434,0.000054561126,0.008362327,0.97408795,0.000020780546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004582213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008149405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017290695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013451973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002890091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05784309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}