{"meta":{"query_hash":"6765e38a37b2","filters":{"venue":"European Journal of Social Security"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6765e38a37b2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Journal+of+Social+Security"},"results":[{"id":"W2524257950","doi":"10.1177/138826271001200201","title":"The Flip Side of the Coin: The Consequences of the European Budgetary Projections on the Adequacy of Social Security Pensions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Security","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Advanced Micro Devices (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Social security; Safeguarding; Sustainability; Economics; Retirement age; Public economics; Distribution (mathematics); Demographic economics; Actuarial science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.04412647910232181,"score_gpt":0.3709409894156449,"score_spread":0.3268145103133231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524257950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93817705,0.002317917,0.011324234,0.017763592,0.00040652667,0.000051733678,0.0009982679,0.00009279412,0.02886791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970843,0.00041616074,0.001269925,0.0003405343,0.00003545032,0.000016817965,0.00015003333,0.000022762997,0.00066407555],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933094,0.004847799,0.00024296503,0.00037817736,0.00076148653,0.0004601786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98492974,0.010710251,0.0014344021,0.0009553628,0.0016131476,0.00035705735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012134753,0.00051766826,0.0008388462,0.00086294365,0.00071292656,0.003926356,0.00094909593,0.0023644958,0.0030365991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039797783,0.00035234203,0.0009844815,0.0011609254,0.0017350956,0.0026029996,0.0023637626,0.0019488902,0.00026757744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022500465,0.00013415447,0.035994813,0.00018980476,0.00037987894,0.0006173712,0.00058976666,0.8132321,0.0007502637,0.110097244,0.005797763,0.02996679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076945795,0.0008967347,0.07020679,0.00064807216,0.00065141235,0.0003250584,0.0040770955,0.67249733,0.00448426,0.22821525,0.016782908,0.0004455913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020845786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009804654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020845786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002551366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00207278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06417543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594500139","doi":"10.1177/138826270400600402","title":"Articles Originally Presented at the Eiss Conference on Federalism and Subsidiarity in Social Security in Rome, September 2004: Old-Age Benefits and Decentralisation: The Spanish Case in Comparative Perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Security","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Subsidiarity; Federalism; Equity (law); Social security; Public administration; Fiscal federalism; Political science; Intergenerational equity; Economics; European union; Law; Economic policy","score_opus":0.04575556527601712,"score_gpt":0.3086111502038605,"score_spread":0.2628555849278434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594500139","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01343264,0.16659601,0.0010456148,0.34292817,0.19103913,0.00019089691,0.0025501638,0.00009454724,0.28212285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08384933,0.11541814,0.00081944664,0.040801406,0.14267012,0.000217287,0.0024311282,0.00027880826,0.6135143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993337,0.00016425972,0.000041120187,0.000094936484,0.00021942428,0.00014654103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813926,0.00096387207,0.000116260606,0.000064350126,0.00048374335,0.00023255349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014568904,0.0009571056,0.0007646796,0.0026207604,0.002419477,0.0059510916,0.0009546999,0.0039881943,0.05640648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033770876,0.00026238413,0.000623358,0.0037238272,0.0014950081,0.0017898831,0.0013838811,0.0029581587,0.005940146],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088708926,0.00004823439,0.00063960516,0.00036344095,0.00001874149,0.00032874919,0.0011107652,0.00017111016,0.00020190857,0.016566673,0.96749395,0.012968074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020279267,0.000015052662,0.0031943512,0.0005514448,0.000009591158,0.00008600908,0.0010988686,0.000063877706,0.00008134149,0.0030428332,0.991825,0.000011274375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0131379785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03019626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05640648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059252577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018684567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18869847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610195279","doi":"10.1023/a:1020524522441","title":"Trends of Poverty and Income Inequality in Cross-National Comparison","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Security","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Economic inequality; Economics; Inequality; Income distribution; Population; Demographic economics; Development economics; Income inequality metrics; Redistribution (election); Distribution (mathematics); Economic growth; Political science; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.07193075837490022,"score_gpt":0.382626313156005,"score_spread":0.3106955547811048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610195279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971238,0.00050661154,0.00013860955,0.00006124931,0.0000051859874,0.0000038570383,0.00045086772,0.0000044504113,0.0017053334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850583,0.00021108228,0.000119822274,0.000010369155,0.0000042029233,0.0000074783793,0.00089063967,0.0000021730991,0.00024844782],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999231,0.00019266849,0.00006925478,0.00013379974,0.0001530678,0.00022022559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824345,0.00041630617,0.0006078149,0.00016208836,0.00044955852,0.00012076671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012929055,0.00011309949,0.00027245007,0.003299567,0.00034925342,0.00081360806,0.0002897017,0.00028375158,0.0013409819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00314138,0.00012366963,0.0002952649,0.0042365715,0.00039860373,0.001413278,0.0013013844,0.00030521592,0.00017791131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001539664,0.000034444438,0.97787535,0.000047135673,0.00014621578,0.00013251437,0.0027591786,0.00038436175,0.0003314159,0.0010351599,0.00047253392,0.016627721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.1380866e-7,0.000021321457,0.9979316,0.0000118040925,0.000008454779,0.000044228997,0.0010070963,0.000168784,0.000074393014,0.000070608214,0.0006570942,0.0000036787528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012921293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016533805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012921293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006467723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002626359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025692165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409649570","doi":"10.1177/13882627251335199","title":"Book Review: Inaccessible access. Rethinking disability inclusion in academic knowledge creation by Kelly Fagan Robinson, Mark T Carew and Nora Ellen Groce RobinsonKelly Fagan, CarewMark T and GroceNora Ellen, Inaccessible access. Rethinking disability inclusion in academic knowledge creation, Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick, New Jersey, 2025;189 pp.: ISBN 9781978841451.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Security","topic":"Disability Education and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fagan inspection; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Library science; Political science; Management; Computer science; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.029322700406001226,"score_gpt":0.34951209563146324,"score_spread":0.320189395225462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409649570","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000800181,0.9267086,0.0002198527,0.022541663,0.032602653,0.000038081103,0.00025884458,0.000057623223,0.01749265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00087293395,0.8978256,0.00035699288,0.016553935,0.016784636,0.00009640504,0.00047502207,0.00006658361,0.066967875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987851,0.00016169,0.00010520396,0.00012551581,0.00074690796,0.00007561314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586004,0.0020032637,0.00041095365,0.00007636797,0.001298022,0.00035126417],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011490674,0.0013108854,0.0021821493,0.0037158786,0.0008537247,0.0044474276,0.0019006949,0.00278654,0.048360616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068471166,0.0005698324,0.00077196385,0.00678718,0.0013310044,0.0041533518,0.0017297948,0.004069492,0.033578005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010416331,0.0000079729325,0.000023335493,0.0017904387,0.0000078692,0.000019854122,0.00003840781,0.000023002252,0.000046344347,0.00071463524,0.9285252,0.06879249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006771414,0.000011536021,0.00015918683,0.0022295166,0.000010471102,0.00017129,0.00004507206,0.000012687554,0.000026525877,0.0004850833,0.9968341,0.000007833866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007771898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017879836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004839566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16178238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}