{"meta":{"query_hash":"41291e9e9ae1","filters":{"venue":"European Law Journal"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/41291e9e9ae1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1544186335","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00593.x","title":"Constitutionalising the Market, Marketising the Constitution, and to Tell the Difference: On the Horizontal Application of the Free Movement Provisions in EU Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Free movement; Doctrine; Law; Corporate law; Shareholder; Law and economics; Domestic market; Movement (music); Free market; Political science; Corporate governance; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.01318807411243448,"score_gpt":0.19650720514356612,"score_spread":0.18331913103113165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544186335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33536944,0.00046084865,0.0018493973,0.0370775,0.0008833021,0.0012827986,0.000019193158,0.000022102673,0.62303543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875761,0.000023167564,0.000019680405,0.011357168,0.0009061501,0.000009241071,0.0000010645145,0.000010411684,0.000096975804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986591,0.0002383879,0.00032569355,0.00013010997,0.000410111,0.00023662354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883443,0.00022594804,0.0003786512,0.00044539332,0.00009759674,0.000017975963],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027363729,0.00014445097,0.00010026131,0.000023912626,0.0019399665,0.00042332674,0.00070601207,0.000017883951,0.000062581275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017538182,0.000052935557,0.00006721256,0.0002824164,0.00077708706,0.00033310274,0.0004088677,0.00039295424,0.000021150767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039929935,0.00004803462,0.008820566,0.000007241284,0.000015852695,0.0000017280906,0.00013478356,0.000041861287,0.00059019425,0.982397,0.005049708,0.0028531048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047483103,0.000015435726,0.38167244,0.0002927459,0.000066334396,0.00004507628,0.00096903637,0.00028369165,0.00015896795,0.007220683,0.6086262,0.00017455468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007450466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013708262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97517633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041221465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025857511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555455131","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12007","title":"Beyond ‘Don't Be Evil’: The European Union GSP+ Trade Preference Scheme and the Incentivisation of the Sri Lankan Garment Industry to Foster Human Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Preference; Government (linguistics); European union; Economics; Business; International trade; Political science; Law; Market economy; Microeconomics; History","score_opus":0.027381979782244475,"score_gpt":0.26024951362918824,"score_spread":0.23286753384694378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555455131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59711933,0.000048764214,0.000015169314,0.02590446,0.00019498351,0.00035389746,0.000004428653,0.000012450985,0.37634653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970519,0.000024960576,0.000036716818,0.002149782,0.0003631887,0.000001491996,0.0000017135776,0.000007998151,0.0003622755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438244,0.0043359627,0.00031352838,0.00015152592,0.00054756016,0.00026895726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999198,0.00006911901,0.0002440257,0.00025803584,0.0000944515,0.00013633845],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038314764,0.00012785596,0.000122018166,0.00002222435,0.0021476808,0.00039905106,0.0007537169,0.000047993522,0.000098981676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049985763,0.000060975904,0.000078196776,0.00016045969,0.0006713524,0.00026853252,0.00023675809,0.0007292538,0.00002191157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044626053,0.0002827106,0.011732128,0.000022849741,0.0001671107,0.000020401976,0.1963368,0.000074048476,0.0015638788,0.72744554,0.05238913,0.009920745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020225737,0.00017291709,0.22002923,0.0002953606,0.00009643253,0.000040462666,0.0204124,0.000082158636,0.0001145186,0.015394474,0.74093324,0.00040622422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011459169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049789026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7120511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045703862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002294879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562879474","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00603.x","title":"Conceptualising Multilevel Regulation in the EU: A Legal Translation of Multilevel Governance?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Multi-level governance; Multilevel model; Heuristic; Political science; Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.062123999983962855,"score_gpt":0.25839458488578365,"score_spread":0.1962705849018208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562879474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3231147,0.0015015826,0.01941834,0.004103021,0.0016115702,0.0004884683,0.0000060583807,0.00007259761,0.64968365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969461,0.0000095377545,0.0006129903,0.0008081064,0.0015197917,0.0000010976846,0.000003665359,0.000016353475,0.00008238846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989337,0.00008702541,0.00038486475,0.00008723405,0.00030385004,0.00020335875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993594,0.00004400425,0.00037463015,0.00011200119,0.000100524536,0.000009386944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009814468,0.00011036445,0.00012865488,0.000050576706,0.00028402035,0.00015652261,0.00018407211,0.000016512005,0.00009653129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047036177,0.000079423415,0.000075554024,0.00014778638,0.000089802495,0.002025898,0.000029860963,0.0001601302,0.00005460585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012823172,0.000270049,0.01652447,0.00008130653,0.00004681235,0.000015821479,0.005640528,0.0019475577,0.0019313091,0.82475656,0.0037496807,0.14490764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011126166,0.0000066213865,0.7825537,0.00013570915,0.00002341077,0.00002501803,0.0009672893,0.007025972,0.000045493867,0.0005564219,0.2073898,0.00015798057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010528452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060421273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82420015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018617828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042762463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3238793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596660678","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00403.x","title":"EU Relations with European Micro‐States. Happily Ever After?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Island Studies and Pacific Affairs","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Weyerhauser (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Accession; Position (finance); Political science; Subject (documents); International trade; Resizing; Member states; European Neighbourhood Policy; Political economy; Economy; European union; Business; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.00948757098520935,"score_gpt":0.23539488812475756,"score_spread":0.2259073171395482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596660678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015561705,0.0003364663,0.0026363349,0.0012503978,0.00041930078,0.00007696999,0.000005574083,0.00006038418,0.9796529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98267746,0.00016774664,0.0011844751,0.00053277094,0.0012497772,2.658312e-7,0.000002467795,0.000036728856,0.014148286],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981044,0.0005937758,0.00029372016,0.00016726929,0.0003552303,0.00048558397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926996,0.00007105413,0.00014429161,0.00013176465,0.00014440491,0.00023849822],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031379426,0.0001344374,0.000120777746,0.000050427843,0.002134893,0.00021643347,0.00023416344,0.000020386293,0.0004678752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030789553,0.00009977542,0.00008307815,0.0001962321,0.00036497915,0.00020584161,0.000047968322,0.0003830732,0.0008611026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011173973,0.00053535955,0.048457067,0.00002721146,0.00072385813,0.01912079,0.42323446,0.00038009053,0.00015484844,0.12957363,0.31945765,0.05721763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003828202,0.000075823875,0.025159454,0.00004290255,0.000021951375,0.00008195603,0.0148299355,0.0000012618692,0.000002422716,0.0001181545,0.95910496,0.00017838494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017792794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056391405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96711576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006607416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003277573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1811984715","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00571.x","title":"NAFTA: The Unfulfilled Promise of the FTA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Free trade agreement; International trade; Free trade; International free trade agreement; International economics; Trade barrier; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.03754476161611029,"score_gpt":0.25854182523579544,"score_spread":0.22099706361968516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1811984715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07617669,0.000024960578,0.000026183458,0.0011601943,0.00059625437,0.00007051263,0.0000015956572,0.0000070535307,0.9219366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99374026,0.000017326365,0.00006304501,0.00029201544,0.0005022039,3.4713406e-7,2.2541346e-7,0.0000058651335,0.005378705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988329,0.00057396106,0.00015185711,0.000044769975,0.00029665098,0.000099860525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995355,0.000030980045,0.00016878494,0.000088094486,0.0001427189,0.00003392686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012840839,0.00003750322,0.00004027728,0.000008756583,0.0008627003,0.000046626745,0.00046863002,0.000010772405,0.00058528286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099521065,0.000018365945,0.000066821776,0.000060550334,0.0002254496,0.00011093541,0.000039923158,0.00014695813,0.00007075424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011973987,0.0000373744,0.00045906578,6.585519e-7,0.000015353155,0.000004908224,0.0063354764,0.0000023172447,0.000067590256,0.9896182,0.0019812763,0.0014658428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053055066,0.000041631443,0.04447051,0.000049832885,0.000027428503,0.00003102345,0.001592968,0.000016390526,0.00071682787,0.01402612,0.93839467,0.000102022495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076265674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011269987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.975592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002350165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038858714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.663528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1841576399","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12102","title":"The <scp>EU</scp>'s Post‐<scp>L</scp>isbon Free Trade Agreements: Commercial Interests in a Changing Constitutional Context","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Context (archaeology); International trade; Human rights; Action (physics); Political science; Dual (grammatical number); Dimension (graph theory); Balance (ability); Free trade; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01650441313002145,"score_gpt":0.25258598467846904,"score_spread":0.23608157154844758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1841576399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118986584,0.00059401576,0.0027107382,0.034042258,0.0040202844,0.0005693712,0.000042333646,0.00021213229,0.8388223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991898,0.00008331268,0.0001710902,0.0044500493,0.0020978714,0.0000022032427,0.0000091455595,0.000043298154,0.0012450136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995252,0.0021541552,0.00064239634,0.0002860284,0.00081734115,0.0008480757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749655,0.0012810437,0.00039039442,0.00030139065,0.000173536,0.00035707073],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037626545,0.0002472035,0.00025038174,0.00023810436,0.003090414,0.000791221,0.0011761709,0.00007010934,0.000082838065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038571265,0.00020787366,0.00013396835,0.0007232209,0.0017369055,0.00056762196,0.00022740202,0.0007904497,0.00027993583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033123372,0.000089614885,0.0028562972,0.000004137773,0.000039831648,0.00007782815,0.012883826,0.000024223229,0.00010342577,0.9644319,0.016426912,0.0030587148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013496303,0.00006986777,0.020513678,0.00013752264,0.000021720796,0.000083469546,0.009509612,0.000031701726,0.00007406983,0.0011656899,0.96697724,0.0000657896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017025953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008612003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9632662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016221864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1948736701","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00585.x","title":"Who Governs Finance? The Shifting Public–Private Divide in the Regulation of Derivatives, Rating Agencies and Hedge Funds","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Hedge fund; Financial crisis; Regulatory authority; Financial regulation; Regulatory reform; Element (criminal law); Finance; Business; Financial market; Credit rating; Private sector; Economics; Financial system; Accounting; Public administration; Market economy; Political science; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.08574467409190864,"score_gpt":0.21824953891740814,"score_spread":0.1325048648254995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1948736701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7856775,0.0012297216,0.0022625565,0.0007747825,0.00012307303,0.000089646506,0.00001254484,0.000007231496,0.20982295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988178,0.0001874802,0.0004251437,0.0003017237,0.00012767418,0.0000011215044,0.0000011793767,0.000012033519,0.00012583256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888253,0.0001526384,0.00056691846,0.00013908099,0.00006602304,0.00019281922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991297,0.000065643064,0.00056232815,0.0001761352,0.00003746706,0.000028696353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019421219,0.000099402394,0.00016991573,0.000054655276,0.00040142814,0.00015280803,0.0003049425,0.000022269634,0.0000721857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032132765,0.00007038088,0.00006112721,0.00023340879,0.00015333903,0.0003968116,0.00008249733,0.00019203538,0.000017842378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075043713,0.000017483198,0.04635559,0.00000557598,0.000008702363,0.00000402744,0.004968617,0.000026153224,0.000027355754,0.94559103,0.0002666767,0.0027213092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023235049,0.000039415772,0.91465807,0.0000346725,0.0000026673283,0.000020322937,0.00063131156,0.00024019675,0.000040606494,0.032549277,0.051459275,0.00009183202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007899824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011802279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9130417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033744876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009529695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30875015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973763647","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00334.x","title":"Dispelling a Myth? The Fathers of Europe and the Construction of a Euro‐Identity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; European union; Identity (music); Democracy; Political science; Democratic deficit; Order (exchange); Commission; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economics; Aesthetics; Politics","score_opus":0.013335995779507143,"score_gpt":0.25419511278780843,"score_spread":0.2408591170083013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973763647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18460149,0.0008163037,0.0014245972,0.0021989958,0.000305197,0.00010623257,0.000007521199,0.000013288481,0.8105264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971073,0.0008726427,0.00019166998,0.0002978076,0.0005110895,9.855787e-8,1.6312302e-7,0.000013136248,0.0010060603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972933,0.0017854405,0.0003437071,0.00008650617,0.00033889824,0.0001521526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989954,0.00018557791,0.0005087224,0.00013616736,0.0001325724,0.000041560696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002795503,0.000072172865,0.0001196129,0.00002093536,0.0007410842,0.00011856647,0.00037145193,0.000010986313,0.00003173658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023620114,0.000040829756,0.00008055644,0.00021602197,0.0022112534,0.00023655075,0.000061999875,0.0002308075,0.000012411499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034676297,0.000014220664,0.00061384815,0.000003973365,0.00001263979,0.000008688017,0.0029077912,0.00004726336,0.00013463642,0.994735,0.0004278024,0.0010594343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023959114,0.00008619578,0.05789093,0.00019901691,0.000115839146,0.00024235861,0.0045912927,0.00006190788,0.00042395256,0.023540415,0.91020674,0.00024543164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021122776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007154147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9711946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009278379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025159312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8147455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017663971","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00448.x","title":"Informal Politics, Formalised Law and the ‘Social Deficit’ of European Integration: Reflections after the Judgments of the ECJ in <i>Viking</i> and <i>Laval</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Treaty; Autonomy; Politics; European union; Constitutionalism; European Union law; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy; Economics","score_opus":0.01934944335824084,"score_gpt":0.2669964195990711,"score_spread":0.24764697624083026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017663971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53039485,0.00011405533,0.000022154587,0.0024722866,0.00021647144,0.00014790754,0.000013264126,0.0000063033367,0.4666127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957169,0.00029219931,0.000040479455,0.0033527226,0.00031248934,0.0000011322749,5.750464e-7,0.000010924285,0.00027253106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794436,0.001069053,0.0003914796,0.00007209227,0.00031383458,0.00020919392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993935,0.00007529816,0.00024223466,0.00011969329,0.00011718407,0.000052056832],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016911714,0.000090218564,0.00012049711,0.00002687759,0.0023062907,0.00010350154,0.00029123973,0.000018859038,0.000015469583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060204853,0.00004306523,0.00007536517,0.00018754894,0.0016991176,0.00028646778,0.00013786601,0.00031370294,6.161305e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006478172,0.000045368248,0.0029154087,0.0000027731273,0.00002745445,0.000007635949,0.053342722,0.0000048090183,0.00007027004,0.9426016,0.00042298908,0.00049417914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004319165,0.00012950132,0.48472375,0.00015891086,0.000108798406,0.00014546727,0.020829214,0.000013513617,0.00031093575,0.0026399756,0.48635513,0.00026565295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021069173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008581385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9399616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002020684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004457065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019718197","doi":"10.1111/1468-0386.00160","title":"Piercing the Legal Veil: Commercial Arbitration and Transnational Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Political science; Arbitration; Autonomy; State (computer science); Law; Politics; Corporate governance; Private sphere; Law and economics; Private law; Transnational governance; Normative; Choice of law; Conflict of laws; Public law; Sociology; Public sphere; Business","score_opus":0.023208120874900012,"score_gpt":0.20960893867687894,"score_spread":0.18640081780197892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019718197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02335442,0.00005269439,0.0004637295,0.018728362,0.00050777255,0.00008352407,0.0000014882445,0.00004297531,0.95676506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289093,0.000006587405,0.00010622535,0.06808369,0.0025648125,0.0000011741984,0.000009418223,0.000019165347,0.000299652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990764,0.000051845345,0.00027641415,0.000118926975,0.00032458312,0.00015179034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996092,0.000026156482,0.00014469336,0.00007218497,0.00012880791,0.000019002011],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005183807,0.0001159751,0.000076765646,0.000053722684,0.0011026498,0.0011389073,0.00018537251,0.000017460563,0.0009175703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014634576,0.00008421041,0.00006434473,0.00008399695,0.00014704364,0.001705797,0.00003321512,0.00028908675,0.00021134023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009148771,0.00003922951,0.000054764925,0.0000043365776,0.000016209997,0.000018723988,0.00007834618,0.000036512454,0.00014228991,0.99476326,0.0043735346,0.0004636452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007034823,0.00001691525,0.004399226,0.000015713453,0.000028826023,0.00012847171,0.00007886729,0.0076766247,0.000030240673,0.007192623,0.97956854,0.00016047573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000063802094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032553528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98757064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001859169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000033803394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033023254","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00369.x","title":"European Democracy, the ‘Permissive Consensus’ and the Collapse of the EU Constitution","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Permissive; Constitution; Democracy; Political science; European union; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Economics; International economics; Politics; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.017930382179921704,"score_gpt":0.2739871366799243,"score_spread":0.2560567545000026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033023254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047181647,0.00050551066,0.00010898278,0.015698776,0.0005537546,0.00019955092,0.000008590304,0.00001834011,0.93572485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99095166,0.0003424036,0.000050196802,0.004547483,0.000832793,1.1595205e-7,1.5136698e-7,0.000015147117,0.0032600781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940772,0.0045964536,0.00043130247,0.00013112434,0.0004525781,0.00031135237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981425,0.00070667075,0.00056139496,0.00027317047,0.00017985074,0.00013642198],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0098394435,0.000120280616,0.00013107379,0.000019405023,0.0037697866,0.00017665653,0.00073475,0.000018561483,0.0000451231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012864094,0.00005566247,0.00012430528,0.00023137951,0.0054017417,0.00009068639,0.00017208348,0.00048843696,0.000047367586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000795842,0.000016292823,0.00037765238,0.000002352009,0.00002494547,0.00008360749,0.007679371,0.000014936095,0.00011692324,0.9825898,0.0070927856,0.0019217955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012456917,0.00002431322,0.04193087,0.00008732086,0.000043242195,0.00037089022,0.0036352375,0.0000048348475,0.00016372115,0.0015843814,0.9507938,0.00011571877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041741077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000811617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9810054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033414428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010061643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035565981","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12085","title":"The Troika: The Interlocking Roles of <i><scp>C</scp>ommission v. <scp>L</scp>uxembourg and <scp>B</scp>elgium</i>, <i><scp>V</scp>an <scp>G</scp>end en <scp>L</scp>oos</i> and <i><scp>C</scp>osta v. <scp>ENEL</scp></i> in the Creation of the <scp>E</scp>uropean Legal Order","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Trinity College Dublin","keywords":"Enforcement; Order (exchange); Political science; Commission; Law; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.009649852419508848,"score_gpt":0.216011355163919,"score_spread":0.20636150274441015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035565981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60375977,0.0053708623,0.001111766,0.0010066736,0.0033106124,0.0029460972,0.0002652392,0.00066650135,0.38156247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9277521,0.0042162985,0.0007943619,0.019478438,0.010505672,0.0002426974,0.00070892303,0.001495606,0.034805916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717869,0.006037836,0.0067465235,0.003911302,0.0063026124,0.005214794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9591072,0.023795584,0.008386789,0.004057968,0.0033916656,0.0012607635],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01611913,0.004294145,0.003418881,0.0021252655,0.0068148295,0.008936608,0.008609433,0.0012539659,0.00004769596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033032116,0.0030334222,0.0020611312,0.004225645,0.003597645,0.0075567504,0.004023075,0.0066466676,0.0006424893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006215966,0.0038591323,0.022425245,0.0013763593,0.0029546686,0.0007165374,0.037865218,0.0039382856,0.029942846,0.17315105,0.71972835,0.0039801733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007115942,0.00091043004,0.020522902,0.0018092713,0.0013231247,0.0009090927,0.044748574,0.0076373206,0.009959965,0.0048542884,0.8999216,0.00028746203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011980003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018328823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34675655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000582464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007102073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071909321","doi":"10.1111/1468-0386.00166","title":"Constructing Common Cultures: The Ontological and Normative Dimensions of Law in the European Union and Mercosur","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; European union; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Articulation (sociology); Salience (neuroscience); Construct (python library); Resizing; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Economics; International trade; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03245436521994794,"score_gpt":0.27104331829459033,"score_spread":0.2385889530746424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071909321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12740315,0.00041681656,0.000022244769,0.016665952,0.00009242684,0.000119732074,0.0000031124268,0.000018602057,0.8552579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876004,0.0002333576,0.00018228666,0.0006414015,0.00012391231,1.270971e-7,5.535465e-7,0.000008514975,0.00004980883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992496,0.0067803925,0.000259461,0.0000885788,0.00022503607,0.00015053859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993164,0.0003062878,0.00016766861,0.00008969005,0.000054502598,0.00006545755],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031740998,0.00007757795,0.000107034866,0.000019248011,0.0013604283,0.00017580159,0.00025099763,0.0000157211,0.000059860435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013349717,0.000038147227,0.000022477238,0.00017678805,0.0012412104,0.00020570638,0.00006645638,0.00037152498,0.00000897719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017090058,0.00003488962,0.0038606753,0.0000021251562,0.000010994816,0.00005746279,0.05580904,0.000005894094,0.000044767286,0.93588763,0.0004523614,0.0038324248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020435934,0.00020904517,0.1208105,0.00027474973,0.00010064849,0.0015980438,0.15381436,0.00008470835,0.000093781746,0.004366143,0.7161108,0.0004936087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031703457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054182974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93152153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017076438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038846097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098372268","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00256.x","title":"National Parliaments in the European Union: Are There Any Benefits to Integration?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; European union; Member states; Public administration; Intervention (counseling); Law; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.04051335279414543,"score_gpt":0.30552785061546567,"score_spread":0.26501449782132025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098372268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026230412,0.00020634466,0.00027210466,0.0180368,0.00024012258,0.0001223248,0.000016297161,0.000033198787,0.9548424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98279935,0.0001743062,0.0002970785,0.010668816,0.0031850752,9.165136e-7,0.000001989165,0.000028397082,0.0028440766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930938,0.005202724,0.0003660243,0.0001889776,0.00080048374,0.00034800632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915886,0.000090968475,0.00023262484,0.00016568962,0.00017358323,0.00017829577],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078532165,0.00013642051,0.000099556586,0.00007165397,0.0010674779,0.00042369243,0.0008894471,0.00001795694,0.00019938317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033264916,0.000099270044,0.00007306922,0.00035265338,0.00012659967,0.00044701798,0.0000714935,0.0004568313,0.0012082017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022064924,0.00029290616,0.0033009711,0.0000025290203,0.000024112594,0.00030658804,0.029726215,0.001808323,0.00003478272,0.78161174,0.079236135,0.10363365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030118207,0.000029667364,0.23520032,0.000109125955,0.0000030769913,0.000030327004,0.0023934739,0.0000048547236,0.000010130433,0.00030100273,0.7614863,0.00013053179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002550204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010390585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95656896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013866661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004828385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104798182","doi":"10.1111/1468-0386.00133","title":"The European Biotech Directive: Past as Prologue","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Directive; Parliament; Treaty; Political science; Commission; Law; European commission; Biotechnology; Business; International trade; European union; Biology; Politics","score_opus":0.06261895996482801,"score_gpt":0.21633528709751798,"score_spread":0.15371632713268996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104798182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040260762,0.0001883586,0.0002683359,0.002208768,0.000983195,0.00012556456,4.3434503e-7,0.00013018721,0.9558344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835058,0.00012302755,0.000023536108,0.00421814,0.006860251,8.517575e-7,0.0000039285355,0.00007247261,0.0051920074],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984924,0.00025148742,0.00033031675,0.0002114035,0.0002772389,0.00043713086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992661,0.000046855042,0.00022313154,0.00022989933,0.00020214976,0.00003188576],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024273805,0.00019761294,0.000115903225,0.00007894716,0.0022486306,0.0012400985,0.0006667183,0.000024752246,0.0004371728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019620663,0.00011528925,0.00011892177,0.00026353882,0.00016087676,0.00062607985,0.00026658698,0.0006167079,0.01285449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012542388,0.00058722956,0.007509095,0.00006117755,0.00045023725,0.0067696995,0.00084697484,0.00023442051,0.0031315747,0.067055866,0.28218684,0.6299126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038533765,0.000039929986,0.0052010207,0.000046667094,0.000023500768,0.0004130669,0.00012270703,0.00012338291,0.000053755713,0.0009631344,0.9924302,0.00019731464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013705164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006988154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021197378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006663433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113108193","doi":"10.1111/1468-0386.00169","title":"Process, Responsibility and Inclusion in EU Constitutionalism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Autonomy; Convention; Constitution; Deliberation; Law and economics; Ratification; European union; Law; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.024658023320042393,"score_gpt":0.3181648140111375,"score_spread":0.2935067906910951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113108193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10720713,0.0005334829,0.000022452483,0.0014271556,0.00021336328,0.000052244122,0.0000019136974,0.000015612824,0.89052665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976163,0.00027838725,0.00021447988,0.0010126057,0.00016707659,2.962488e-7,4.147619e-7,0.000006497618,0.00070395693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997791,0.0013099121,0.00022142883,0.0001327925,0.00038049242,0.00016437312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954337,0.00008979096,0.000074527175,0.000053035237,0.00013960202,0.0000996593],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00426896,0.00006756446,0.000081531274,0.000044450284,0.002882071,0.000080794445,0.00016922595,0.00001431882,0.00014608489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001017781,0.000058322195,0.000026768937,0.00010170034,0.0006107474,0.00024677196,0.0003378101,0.00021570867,0.000033491073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017481074,0.00003362186,0.0016431446,0.0000021230335,0.0000049403748,0.00009475872,0.005505458,0.0000058507594,0.00003252909,0.99188536,0.00033794908,0.00043678167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041440802,0.000025970423,0.007130485,0.000056741934,0.0000033517592,0.00006367123,0.0010218802,0.0000019076401,0.000032100153,0.044936135,0.94620967,0.00010368975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000091511734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009803533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94694924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006891736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009092726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99841607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122248100","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12135","title":"Hermann Heller <scp>NOW</scp>","year":2015,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Normative; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Constitutional theory; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science","score_opus":0.04958923047849809,"score_gpt":0.2942373642317216,"score_spread":0.2446481337532235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122248100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018607648,0.0042340844,0.00015059617,0.0006360478,0.005877858,0.000083363324,0.0000141312985,0.00006415227,0.97033215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287437,0.00069591665,0.00016843536,0.0038097627,0.011776488,4.375986e-7,0.0000036577412,0.000054054195,0.054747555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993147,0.004170485,0.0005334053,0.00029944265,0.00071008614,0.001139577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713844,0.00038403622,0.0002579677,0.0002801274,0.00026359872,0.0016758058],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005063695,0.00027222937,0.0003364803,0.000056200413,0.0014925204,0.0003677573,0.0007833333,0.00017282898,0.0007830441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010233102,0.00023982396,0.00025656552,0.00019611737,0.0015660715,0.0004120235,0.0002310173,0.0012875932,0.032474242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011748156,0.00011795048,0.00019820026,0.000004221555,0.00012928569,0.0009203552,0.0042864885,0.000017581357,0.0000020571406,0.9304468,0.06333296,0.00053232274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007058327,0.00015717611,0.00080178055,0.0000491833,0.00008228696,0.000113029026,0.0029314246,0.000020023926,0.000021045567,0.15514289,0.8398668,0.00010851988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053089545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002900886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91558456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015500934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024234249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290364549","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12166","title":"A Missed Opportunity: The Fundamental Rights Agency and the Euro Area Crisis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Politics; Political science; Discretion; Law and economics; Enforcement; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05805439268675348,"score_gpt":0.2859324095500006,"score_spread":0.22787801686324713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290364549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023675455,0.00061888574,0.00006983348,0.053329375,0.00051994977,0.00010259926,0.000010472117,0.000030820443,0.9216426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827329,0.0013277853,0.000029335526,0.004761779,0.0008468246,8.386835e-7,3.5721848e-7,0.000014205581,0.010286003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728596,0.0016961646,0.00024264753,0.00013217598,0.0004120214,0.00023104488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990706,0.00033941714,0.00015802636,0.00013544338,0.00012117056,0.00017534473],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024964986,0.00010823199,0.000105661034,0.00002026892,0.0034266233,0.00038473157,0.00049733,0.000010322471,0.0006297861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026893648,0.000041045394,0.00010312524,0.00006054826,0.0012113597,0.00022037559,0.00012757389,0.0001875756,0.00017000739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006401236,0.000029847415,0.00013204725,0.0000010885733,0.00009589343,0.00015001193,0.0075569265,1.0661292e-7,0.000059376445,0.89354664,0.09462287,0.0037412061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007131271,0.000031745913,0.0014015934,0.000036602076,0.000023835682,0.00006735724,0.0014798308,0.0000010369042,0.00001099456,0.006365343,0.9897845,0.00008407433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020015305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037150222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036202076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027424687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585784017","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12215","title":"Competing Supremacies and Clashing Institutional Rationalities: the Danish Supreme Court's Decision in the <i>Ajos</i> Case and the National Limits of Judicial Cooperation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Danish; Law; Preliminary ruling; Scope (computer science); Political science; Economic Justice; Precedent; Constitutional court; European union; Perspective (graphical); Common law; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.06142473417953803,"score_gpt":0.32909504654186816,"score_spread":0.26767031236233013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585784017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48083225,0.00059665955,0.00025579575,0.015350471,0.0004495408,0.0002473105,0.000026184736,0.000008910512,0.50223285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697036,0.0005315752,0.00015665212,0.0012856685,0.0009540339,0.0000018036027,0.0000021416133,0.000006692586,0.000091067195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973772,0.001277807,0.00037310642,0.0001239625,0.0007090563,0.00013882405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978383,0.0013314922,0.0002891658,0.00009745476,0.00040773398,0.000035849214],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075510237,0.00009423676,0.0001192088,0.000028610637,0.008128632,0.0011159119,0.00046736066,0.000017759845,0.000020207275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023743517,0.00004962624,0.000047234156,0.000047556176,0.0025054575,0.00061662524,0.00012897266,0.00030652393,0.000003655165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006014184,0.000018907493,0.0008837509,0.0000027102608,0.000022953325,0.00006288413,0.01625822,0.00015446774,0.000024487936,0.98099774,0.00090272306,0.00061101484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009410526,0.00022463646,0.11512448,0.00089164136,0.00015019679,0.006846134,0.077811725,0.00379483,0.000062479456,0.047504865,0.7374603,0.00071818114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057609053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007836106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9334929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003790805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079095196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772763310","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12250","title":"European federalism: Pitfalls and possibilities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Realm; Clearance; Political science; Democracy; Corporate governance; European union; Section (typography); Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Economics; Politics; Business; International trade; Management","score_opus":0.03901740530694834,"score_gpt":0.3136660680980487,"score_spread":0.27464866279110034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772763310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09343266,0.00023880489,0.000049025948,0.0026368187,0.0005306411,0.00005125999,0.000007465377,0.0000551882,0.90299815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642607,0.00069312274,0.00027070267,0.0019117104,0.0023916375,1.1782876e-7,4.478792e-7,0.000040846204,0.030430742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970487,0.0016887214,0.00028761313,0.00021884884,0.0003474765,0.0004086419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986756,0.000057697125,0.00041042874,0.00040400022,0.000096250566,0.00035602588],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032484639,0.00014453377,0.00014112098,0.00002870402,0.007745629,0.0025761076,0.0008913229,0.000019665982,0.00016285227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006169458,0.00012872591,0.00008356788,0.000025557249,0.001129599,0.00085725257,0.0002429369,0.00038175762,0.00036613375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018221634,0.00003279069,0.0018500311,0.0000065284403,0.000023783148,0.00048118655,0.012675107,0.0000014337066,0.00007997836,0.96434724,0.010383794,0.010099922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046652823,0.000048812624,0.13539168,0.00007799551,0.000009621522,0.00008155919,0.0010423653,9.601863e-7,0.000021234508,0.0028777183,0.85976446,0.00021705363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015660085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015124048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96146953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003500839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035390894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99845934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121741911","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00460.x","title":"‘New Governance’ in European Corporate Law Regulation as Transnational Legal Pluralism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Pluralism (philosophy); Legitimacy; Polity; Corporate law; European union; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Corporation; Regulatory state; Political science; Political economy; Economic system; Business; Economics; Law; International trade; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.017944051899819482,"score_gpt":0.203192673541809,"score_spread":0.18524862164198952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121741911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09654422,0.00010091715,0.0005173441,0.010697743,0.00064797467,0.00013212225,0.000003844989,0.00010146458,0.89125437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98459023,0.000016197044,0.00031436785,0.008900609,0.003538356,2.5984488e-7,0.00003116464,0.00005050911,0.0025582875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981066,0.00009560439,0.00059705885,0.00028887947,0.0005572814,0.0003545637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872446,0.000011908256,0.00086420093,0.00019878082,0.00014952422,0.00005112634],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095627166,0.00024962326,0.00020643805,0.00008241019,0.0003636261,0.00093507016,0.00041662843,0.00003077446,0.00089231296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022294347,0.00023592336,0.00012941535,0.00038163183,0.00006217265,0.003033156,0.000049205508,0.00043467843,0.00085221475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000906803,0.000052080228,0.0002493216,0.000005126328,0.000008874265,0.00073362316,0.000039433744,0.00054340117,0.00060699886,0.97792256,0.009803562,0.009944341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018815447,0.000041890322,0.15092403,0.0001021893,0.000023635193,0.00015889264,0.000021108142,0.00021409163,0.000055461613,0.04185037,0.8043451,0.0003817325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044126797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011688251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9360722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007655412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003525901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122232392","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12167","title":"Did the Financial Crisis Change European Citizenship Law? An Analysis of Citizenship Rights Adjudication Before and After the Financial Crisis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Adjudication; Social rights; Political science; Legislation; Law; Treaty; Financial crisis; Human rights; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02769965853017733,"score_gpt":0.2744520328460897,"score_spread":0.24675237431591238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122232392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64686674,0.00151511,0.0013817716,0.037073147,0.00104816,0.00061449246,0.0003374335,0.00015178308,0.31101134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894628,0.00040477343,0.00005700248,0.0067332643,0.003010965,0.0000048722827,0.000003865521,0.00004237999,0.00028010385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99268436,0.004978422,0.0006444748,0.00039930112,0.0007306876,0.0005627358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789953,0.00024782695,0.000672998,0.00059051655,0.00028263844,0.00030646447],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048357574,0.00026607153,0.00033351744,0.00013397034,0.002532082,0.00029320284,0.001038422,0.000065000946,0.00026483007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004698805,0.00013908923,0.00036989755,0.0006730528,0.0011632496,0.0003958116,0.00017726445,0.00045514465,0.000073582676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029320407,0.00009172965,0.0053952737,0.000013367432,0.00037005098,0.00024160558,0.050200664,0.0000051047737,0.000046748835,0.9223271,0.010103134,0.010912032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075583626,0.00023379161,0.85343885,0.00012616762,0.00078212674,0.000037221274,0.001277084,0.000010977637,0.00004349781,0.013114151,0.12977208,0.00040823722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011221347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024381036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90921295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006670519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038674934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123290535","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00331.x","title":"Spaces and Places: A Systems Theory Approach to Regulatory Competition in European Company Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Corporation; Corporate law; Competition (biology); Regulatory competition; Mandate; European Union law; Argument (complex analysis); Competition law; Commercial law; Legislator; Law; European integration; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Corporate governance; International trade; Market economy; Management; Legislation; Monopoly","score_opus":0.012808142319983763,"score_gpt":0.17734083691748104,"score_spread":0.16453269459749728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123290535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2965636,0.00035705778,0.0005856706,0.00012002076,0.0002454499,0.00013583989,0.0000022824395,0.00005992571,0.70193017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955774,0.000007962144,0.00013057402,0.0012523938,0.0023627826,0.0000012785965,0.00001268328,0.00005460753,0.00060030626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854165,0.00024344384,0.00040271008,0.00025499472,0.00027182687,0.00028539044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999349,0.000022803073,0.00033718682,0.00018196102,0.0000764969,0.00003258324],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001936812,0.00019546926,0.00021799465,0.00012258318,0.00037580603,0.0011789318,0.0002488187,0.000019183788,0.000024556695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001011216,0.00017022365,0.0000487834,0.00022018669,0.0001246037,0.0008589845,0.0001525535,0.00025466387,0.00025870043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005797176,0.00009157356,0.001741573,0.000073076386,0.0000094990955,0.00016870981,0.0000763031,0.0018731214,0.0001950945,0.9916138,0.0038051845,0.00029409933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017383492,0.000031556487,0.11660562,0.0006042564,0.000043303222,0.0002346688,0.0012106083,0.001035934,0.0000080903055,0.0041119973,0.87379605,0.0005796026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095830776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007546316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9875018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036227015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054013385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200001303","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12409","title":"Linking “values” to EU trade policy—a good idea?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Linkage (software); Consistency (knowledge bases); Commercial policy; Economics; International economics; Commission; European commission; International trade; Value (mathematics); European union; Business; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.04281250561502495,"score_gpt":0.3100788756421194,"score_spread":0.2672663700270944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200001303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031076344,0.00012269415,0.00070343283,0.0818525,0.00033930512,0.00008696884,0.000011013887,0.000120403216,0.91365606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90382177,0.00015954582,0.0008215538,0.08367466,0.009589256,2.741262e-7,7.5839046e-7,0.00005296103,0.0018792353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969771,0.0012705578,0.00037637868,0.00024246186,0.0005853769,0.00054813526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859536,0.000071486174,0.00020532435,0.00015405935,0.000046499255,0.00092728663],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014021489,0.00015627228,0.0001693477,0.000053209893,0.0014113493,0.00040765377,0.0008233657,0.000030489677,0.00016332685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065371575,0.0001501903,0.00014252563,0.00048637885,0.0001713863,0.0003205257,0.00012795073,0.0005696436,0.0012429939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029977362,0.000032503063,0.0002071503,0.0000067855453,0.000023572124,0.00039290288,0.037353065,0.00015579973,0.00037007747,0.91577667,0.03133041,0.014321102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028471032,0.000104802086,0.003456863,0.00006274439,0.000008227857,0.000025616047,0.0006776666,0.0000057467705,0.000082648774,0.0006363003,0.99445957,0.00019507698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031705655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024533964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96312916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086122825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012288961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283816402","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12436","title":"Bridging the gap between facts and norms: mutual trust, the European Arrest Warrant and the rule of law in an interdisciplinary context","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Universiteit Antwerpen","keywords":"Member states; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Warrant; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Bridging (networking); Sociology; Business; European union; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05464511353422346,"score_gpt":0.3224470056814126,"score_spread":0.26780189214718914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283816402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8259007,0.000978095,0.00044136588,0.0074689146,0.00032562052,0.00022040782,0.000023140257,0.000022002669,0.16461976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744487,0.00031149664,0.000034048786,0.00073072355,0.0013349823,4.873127e-7,0.000004588913,0.000026127655,0.00011270133],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931584,0.005628251,0.00041523456,0.00021427083,0.0003066667,0.00027717307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891704,0.0003583503,0.00022954195,0.00027096565,0.00009687466,0.00012720437],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065943757,0.00013830398,0.00018821924,0.000028874723,0.0024166675,0.00055974704,0.0005110609,0.000018635561,0.000021988848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020666937,0.000070787595,0.00006335755,0.00012903793,0.0016591917,0.0004998076,0.00053262815,0.00069289294,0.000017821425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005530303,0.00017318758,0.0036804997,0.000098126446,0.00017199799,0.0015871614,0.55824745,0.00007251955,0.0011636061,0.13846466,0.00089081546,0.29489696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063732243,0.0006124333,0.19221397,0.0011769015,0.0006633269,0.0012642102,0.60583276,0.00043719122,0.0004465215,0.00517477,0.18489222,0.00091248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007916478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004870088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29398447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022823298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035021378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99888206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}