{"meta":{"query_hash":"87be39047769","filters":{"venue":"European Public Law"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/87be39047769","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+Public+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1576404703","doi":"10.54648/euro2013022","title":"Constitutional Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures in the European Union: Prospects and Limits","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Public Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; European union; Political science; Legislature; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial review; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Scholarship; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.03694694725771726,"score_gpt":0.26418695127136416,"score_spread":0.2272400040136469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576404703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14994377,0.06086019,0.025398282,0.27321506,0.0007820733,0.00007525951,0.00007403699,0.00010010385,0.48955122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786435,0.003691479,0.0025088426,0.009240759,0.00032828294,0.000091815695,0.000022950615,0.00001818718,0.0054540867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9175655,0.06688079,0.0016688551,0.0042601614,0.0050295456,0.004595159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93222284,0.057751063,0.0021954838,0.0026314666,0.0025343692,0.002664721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0746009,0.0003581516,0.0010160499,0.0023720374,0.0098737655,0.031133499,0.0030261625,0.018070824,0.004314942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053102583,0.00065088563,0.0007523369,0.003046278,0.050985493,0.02613861,0.015475361,0.008717349,0.0004232085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012208205,0.000015262483,0.00016274671,0.000024119307,0.000003701561,0.000029678009,0.0046278783,0.00020442293,0.00002556241,0.98665255,0.0006987215,0.0075431056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040058483,0.000040746865,0.00088802085,0.00051739736,0.000012900607,0.00007113905,0.011862578,0.0009002168,0.00016558175,0.9208266,0.06463862,0.00003622985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049621086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033420252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0746009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010183587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012433747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39453197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604472206","doi":"10.54648/euro2018008","title":"Food Fraud: Protecting European Consumers Through Effective Deterrence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Public Law","topic":"Identification and Quantification in Food","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"European union; Legislature; Deterrence (psychology); Member states; Deterrence theory; Food safety; Political science; Member state; Business; Law; International trade","score_opus":0.033295024835944556,"score_gpt":0.2682258492962956,"score_spread":0.23493082446035107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604472206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27765098,0.016167643,0.052125994,0.1307295,0.00105856,0.00057030545,0.00012640683,0.00034272592,0.52122796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94097906,0.0034082793,0.012386983,0.025900632,0.00029875,0.00017317221,0.00006654809,0.00003550362,0.016751248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98308784,0.009091415,0.0007807774,0.0012908659,0.004163243,0.0015858167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861659,0.0059857345,0.0027797094,0.0020873994,0.0022538998,0.0007273704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018586103,0.00056211464,0.00052974245,0.0016029228,0.0024378514,0.009176539,0.0014332284,0.009869301,0.0034090397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031687096,0.0004006426,0.0005816053,0.00086218293,0.0062321625,0.006003228,0.007903043,0.0042115143,0.0009204311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020657944,0.00061093253,0.024121867,0.00048229564,0.00010892436,0.0009159039,0.0067261574,0.0018792778,0.0035396186,0.61485434,0.03376539,0.31278872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020409348,0.0010295927,0.043670893,0.004050004,0.00018817489,0.0022431237,0.010406197,0.009166103,0.011100864,0.27386266,0.6438295,0.00024877064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028893738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026430113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018586103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017069336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005046247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09829384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126210121","doi":"10.54648/euro2020061","title":"Autonomy of the EU Legal Order: A Concept in Need of Revision?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Public Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Autonomy; Political science; Normative; Law; Convention; Law and economics; International trade; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03355890929708015,"score_gpt":0.27166627031602997,"score_spread":0.2381073610189498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126210121","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029720305,0.04560666,0.017391816,0.7452202,0.009398703,0.00006840682,0.000065995075,0.000055569497,0.15247235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.830844,0.02743407,0.008616124,0.10397046,0.01471049,0.00018594788,0.00011718218,0.00014039845,0.013981309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97467065,0.013201585,0.0015451559,0.0028136494,0.0060865344,0.0016824108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97257894,0.019468566,0.0012930644,0.0023681347,0.0031918488,0.0010994816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034674205,0.000528101,0.0013512026,0.001998186,0.005946927,0.022458017,0.003687762,0.015079397,0.0019472399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03672224,0.00035884438,0.0007123621,0.0030440353,0.08431438,0.036831055,0.009953325,0.02455911,0.0004273523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032439493,0.000004556397,0.00006129295,0.000030741565,0.0000012070649,0.000043845972,0.0048484127,0.0000323751,0.00003179794,0.9871954,0.0026040412,0.005143096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014840876,0.000031960655,0.00043066684,0.0007504555,0.000006077843,0.00026940188,0.013536848,0.00035448163,0.00014367237,0.7662579,0.21815367,0.00005008791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075120386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005641301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034674205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009076237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01788548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18337697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285328168","doi":"10.54648/euro2021036","title":"Prevalence of an Economic Right/Freedom Over a Social Right in a Horizontal Litigation Once Again","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Public Law","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017734203078210414,"score_gpt":0.2816267083518652,"score_spread":0.2638925052736548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285328168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14846826,0.0026439864,0.03479961,0.10332447,0.001893881,0.00013912574,0.00010375305,0.00007611207,0.70855075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94599557,0.00051870145,0.0029081646,0.019785685,0.00091085007,0.00009460856,0.000029862604,0.000030751184,0.029725749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712198,0.008257772,0.0012561452,0.0035404535,0.011304919,0.0044208807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98034346,0.014019332,0.0014288771,0.0013034273,0.0020069282,0.00089793664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013816776,0.00035131248,0.0005905655,0.0014520357,0.008245069,0.015767599,0.0013498411,0.009281952,0.006553077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024996588,0.0005072835,0.00078141375,0.0011391307,0.019554527,0.009181605,0.0083348835,0.013402576,0.00080699817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012861154,0.0000196925,0.0009994274,0.000020768779,0.0000071023737,0.0002458415,0.0017992979,0.000119415134,0.00028311115,0.9880114,0.0026985032,0.0057825847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079016194,0.00023883523,0.0068330434,0.00074506225,0.00007999596,0.000906419,0.015980259,0.0025889222,0.002649235,0.8252966,0.14449626,0.00010635833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012642174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01769428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015767599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006645755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007822337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07307094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}