{"meta":{"query_hash":"ea7ce05eb90f","filters":{"venue":"European journal of law and technology"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ea7ce05eb90f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=European+journal+of+law+and+technology"},"results":[{"id":"W1491899767","doi":"","title":"Are websites adequately communicating terms & conditions link in a browse-wrap agreement?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European journal of law and technology","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Business; Political science; Agreement; Sample (material); Law; Internet privacy; Advertising; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.03389165199408053,"score_gpt":0.2547184467241752,"score_spread":0.22082679473009467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491899767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49086758,0.001506402,0.00022675237,0.016078517,0.00030411987,0.00011203054,0.0000032343862,0.000104321705,0.49079704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778867,0.00007297423,0.00022774312,0.0014828971,0.00031347576,0.0000013102688,0.0000028889212,0.000013787309,0.00009626381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992368,0.000043984648,0.00034902088,0.000070786155,0.00008544274,0.00021395723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999176,0.000027048807,0.0005335043,0.0001602985,0.000083724306,0.000019398976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005371594,0.00009404591,0.00016528096,0.0003925633,0.00018587241,0.000081194834,0.00024723116,0.000038051392,0.00011600875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007931411,0.00008237593,0.000043732034,0.00030413785,0.00016855144,0.0006233231,0.00017756659,0.00034423175,0.00016302746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015191074,0.00028952453,0.11942337,0.000049977578,0.00006515812,0.000098319986,0.000058202848,0.000005542548,0.0019589756,0.8623549,0.0028112829,0.012869582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085135887,0.0000279785,0.06814424,0.00019372586,0.000043848213,0.00011828885,0.00063355744,0.0000661451,0.00005401508,0.0025491032,0.92717046,0.00014731364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010671894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044228607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92435914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014106527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038984394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33591932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533793355","doi":"","title":"Open Content Licenses Without Representation: Can You Give Away More Rights Than You Have?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European journal of law and technology","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nautical Research Society","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Reuse; Negotiation; Commons; Database transaction; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.0522966163686587,"score_gpt":0.2527342022989823,"score_spread":0.2004375859303236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533793355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5342252,0.0003445646,0.00009939546,0.016431203,0.00031680954,0.00036554082,0.0000014027399,0.00008415373,0.44813168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99399245,0.000029234996,0.00021230394,0.0014635401,0.00049711956,0.0000032243513,0.0000030261892,0.000025596208,0.003773509],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989045,0.0000387887,0.00044809125,0.00022918741,0.00015361264,0.00022577385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986668,0.000019200352,0.00044912586,0.0002504206,0.00058371044,0.000030723982],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030295402,0.00017625194,0.0003129381,0.00026384124,0.00028489152,0.0005529652,0.0006974719,0.000048229937,0.00092547527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113360176,0.00011111642,0.000060156017,0.00019922604,0.00031523287,0.0010973483,0.00053745083,0.00029810218,0.00019077367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011115716,0.0010380539,0.08346833,0.00024399304,0.0013609482,0.0024707639,0.0033584107,0.0000073687042,0.020753406,0.33655608,0.42601663,0.12361442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023587567,0.00034523915,0.008301701,0.00021755917,0.00012219581,0.00037865512,0.0018959588,0.00054195203,0.0030252489,0.010794754,0.9715768,0.00044119358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017975407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025104874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5455601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014026793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016394388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1838453216","doi":"","title":"Book review: ‘Employment law and the new workplace in the social media age’","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European journal of law and technology","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Labour law; Term (time); Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.011876348563065384,"score_gpt":0.24574515109778777,"score_spread":0.2338688025347224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1838453216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022391456,0.051778674,0.00016929195,0.24948648,0.00013913788,0.00018565486,5.117257e-7,0.000021145403,0.69597995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482296,0.01732664,0.000051136205,0.033754386,0.0002876034,0.0000011556482,4.2469614e-7,0.0000060430525,0.0003429877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913055,0.00038645967,0.00023311551,0.000049005594,0.00009280451,0.00010804528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961525,0.00016276437,0.00012287138,0.000052175637,0.000019049168,0.000027899045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002331254,0.000049900143,0.0001379201,0.000029240433,0.00024481176,0.00006962623,0.00022824039,0.000026031661,0.000016588052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078582016,0.000027696944,0.000028811213,0.00009804378,0.00077873474,0.00019163446,0.000021402086,0.00020184391,0.0000058101114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012974856,0.0000073294577,0.000008038963,0.0000060934885,0.0000061943147,0.000010040679,0.0048613325,9.540304e-8,3.1632092e-7,0.9338782,0.017624673,0.043584734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053214596,0.00003506535,0.00004114021,0.00010161508,0.000012994723,0.000017395694,0.0005983408,2.7390044e-7,0.0000025312788,0.016170966,0.9824537,0.000033849254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014865134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003236429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.964829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000751129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014688903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28692806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100911754","doi":"","title":"Between the right to know and the right to forget: looking beyond the Google case","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European journal of law and technology","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Right to know; Right to be forgotten; Right to privacy; Human rights; Internet privacy; The Right to Privacy; Context (archaeology); European union; The Internet; Public interest; Data Protection Act 1998; Information privacy; Fundamental rights; Freedom of information; Economic Justice; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.019568124732197496,"score_gpt":0.2763933361906877,"score_spread":0.2568252114584902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100911754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56085145,0.0037569434,0.0024479867,0.32767633,0.0007271359,0.00073274865,0.000019911793,0.000083465355,0.103704035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790037,0.000091366244,0.0002508086,0.0010853437,0.0005247433,0.000002043471,2.566727e-7,0.000008865425,0.0001361852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864054,0.00061975035,0.00023346477,0.000120642595,0.00017950645,0.00020608898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914795,0.00017715499,0.00015045491,0.0002646571,0.00012773983,0.000132048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039960626,0.00008623578,0.00015494843,0.00008320976,0.001097815,0.00014051127,0.0006766157,0.000045767243,0.000006904153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006198644,0.000038744252,0.00003100424,0.00027315732,0.0008166266,0.00014886809,0.00043780985,0.00037413204,0.000014174279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016560488,0.00004771286,0.0013684815,0.000008127004,0.0001328828,0.0013717122,0.031159576,0.0000020251102,0.00014910787,0.8439667,0.03407568,0.08755238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005233203,0.00020735557,0.000088012996,0.000015583179,0.000041051284,0.0007772619,0.0021071334,0.000001796257,0.0003204312,0.056921132,0.9389257,0.00007124188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023142096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012359831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022501006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035942183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84436166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123080726","doi":"","title":"ANPR: Code and Rhetorics of Compliance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European journal of law and technology","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Compliance (psychology); Politics; Key (lock); Internet privacy; Public relations; Business; Computer security; Political science; Public administration; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.052354368029112044,"score_gpt":0.3200442120695702,"score_spread":0.26768984404045815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123080726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.705407,0.01791396,0.00066668045,0.004223051,0.00081858155,0.00011605069,0.0000069421208,0.000053472264,0.2707942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812067,0.0009402518,0.0004084313,0.00011851511,0.0002531544,1.3167067e-7,7.162044e-8,0.0000063095717,0.00015248105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926394,0.00016689245,0.0002198394,0.000054136937,0.00011523123,0.00017995437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994333,0.000054117798,0.0002189932,0.00006343934,0.0001409322,0.00008922327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010062845,0.00005466381,0.00019108377,0.00006246221,0.00020108162,0.0000145274425,0.00014833706,0.00004559023,0.00000963643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012521396,0.000048339003,0.000027767477,0.0001255539,0.0007212958,0.00012994936,0.000034324305,0.0001665692,0.0000031312097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018911875,0.000051402516,0.017586779,0.000016881622,0.000031295393,0.00002409953,0.0058366717,6.751682e-8,0.0009787075,0.9469794,0.00029214862,0.028183633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087630696,0.000276779,0.007108795,0.00009235679,0.00004863165,0.00006481925,0.0041963076,0.0000016715469,0.00029591197,0.00667294,0.98022103,0.00014443911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002266363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049543578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012279229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022415667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26576445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}