{"meta":{"query_hash":"bc3637c1182d","filters":{"venue":"Faculty publications"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bc3637c1182d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Faculty+publications"},"results":[{"id":"W1535565003","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of the Treatment of Employee Pension and Wage Claims in Insolvency and Under Guarantee Schemes in OECD Countries: Comparative Law Lessons for Detroit and the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Pension; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Context (archaeology); Wage; Business; Debt; Government (linguistics); Debtor; Accounting; Economics; Finance; Labour economics","score_opus":0.05945118811615021,"score_gpt":0.30903168380747686,"score_spread":0.24958049569132665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535565003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8774513,0.007215452,0.00079185003,0.0027433794,0.00006923439,0.00007695568,0.00052235625,0.00001701276,0.11111241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924406,0.003223797,0.00050217315,0.0005854106,0.00004628482,0.00006932488,0.00027676055,0.000007737315,0.002847923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583614,0.0019049722,0.00024020494,0.0001924293,0.0009126534,0.00091368536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491197,0.0021147167,0.0014616998,0.00023099149,0.0010223147,0.00025828698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039953873,0.00026796295,0.0005467487,0.008350446,0.0025936374,0.0049495823,0.00083591783,0.0011078396,0.0017786522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008523573,0.00019453472,0.0009231111,0.010290997,0.0034308413,0.0015124269,0.0022830302,0.0016929433,0.00012684368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004948095,0.00047430204,0.3866958,0.00049661135,0.00059960777,0.00400842,0.03097347,0.008384095,0.0011006535,0.48172793,0.012720615,0.07232364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008938615,0.00033524842,0.86491495,0.0008724389,0.00048554374,0.0007591087,0.06473237,0.003263116,0.001551232,0.01149344,0.0514029,0.00010024521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21502602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32432067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21502602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042192345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4275489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545203131","doi":"","title":"Judges and Their Editors","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Craft; Law; Pride; Political science; Judicial opinion; Economic Justice; Sociology; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.05403533965330897,"score_gpt":0.39658424178053403,"score_spread":0.34254890212722505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545203131","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012569097,0.039672248,0.0015389923,0.33819875,0.41339594,0.00008994639,0.00017500184,0.00022844231,0.20544383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041383967,0.031140978,0.0019790647,0.096934244,0.25797364,0.00014363792,0.00028899722,0.00032466315,0.5698308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97738326,0.0057176105,0.0014684163,0.0022604542,0.010854961,0.002315322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94091445,0.015184174,0.0034599947,0.0039413217,0.027118832,0.00938126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014459393,0.0009118319,0.00092674233,0.0030585187,0.0071955654,0.018038325,0.0021869838,0.005989399,0.042641148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10232015,0.0006942476,0.00051057345,0.0020092824,0.0057525886,0.007270173,0.0041806395,0.0097136395,0.026124738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107839505,0.00000789853,0.000120387165,0.000060186147,0.000002828088,0.000052792606,0.0005250548,0.00002430683,0.00007089727,0.030472046,0.94681066,0.021842096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034102306,0.00000415359,0.00009587795,0.00007572616,0.0000021501635,0.000030190202,0.0002746448,0.00001457289,0.00003087059,0.0037988534,0.9956657,0.0000038347375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023659484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004949686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042641148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005216846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012146329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14264882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580136977","doi":"","title":"Privatizing Workplace Privacy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Expectation of privacy; Pager; Officer; Public sector; Private sector; Concurring opinion; Probable cause; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Information privacy; Business; Certiorari; Engineering; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.08838665354627506,"score_gpt":0.30108460601069587,"score_spread":0.2126979524644208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580136977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049711674,0.0042855386,0.070030995,0.19606575,0.0013403969,0.000085691,0.00017840999,0.00048147776,0.67781997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84848344,0.0021566683,0.0067692744,0.04425197,0.0010655816,0.00014302414,0.00011849407,0.00014072581,0.09687071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99277365,0.0021677683,0.00025293135,0.0015155763,0.0019929192,0.0012971424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99126023,0.0033099148,0.0007456675,0.003201278,0.00078246486,0.0007004752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055486145,0.00027532058,0.0002841715,0.0006209748,0.0043265508,0.007845568,0.0013162781,0.0059530186,0.014420217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010695583,0.0004161272,0.000761225,0.00062188605,0.012366586,0.012795354,0.01127935,0.008778051,0.002599606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013988815,0.000026189588,0.0005890135,0.00003324931,0.0000058926885,0.00010135562,0.0020125653,0.00025617346,0.00051620253,0.9704351,0.009704058,0.01630632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027677444,0.000057165194,0.0013030537,0.00022254843,0.000018518882,0.00032043247,0.0017301629,0.0013304077,0.0015248262,0.6166543,0.37677473,0.00003616214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045148176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004403214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014420217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004296776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063097733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048240423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1784713775","doi":"","title":"Judges Talking To Jurors in Criminal Cases: Why U.S. Judges Do It So Differently From Just About Everyone Else","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Criminology","score_opus":0.10335445317305295,"score_gpt":0.39372760312334826,"score_spread":0.2903731499502953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1784713775","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07639517,0.023184996,0.0027583726,0.8372959,0.006967075,0.00019716733,0.00009666615,0.00009861192,0.053006027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71582437,0.011652092,0.0032931902,0.25038213,0.004420061,0.00031301897,0.00011117437,0.00015679789,0.013847231],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91855913,0.056532644,0.002858195,0.004079351,0.011616703,0.0063539795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92175514,0.041211624,0.0063754455,0.0017940298,0.019812806,0.009050907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052736767,0.0005427801,0.00060314545,0.0024516108,0.035915054,0.017856186,0.0032294302,0.014970911,0.0048436304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17009188,0.0012837315,0.0005603899,0.002667004,0.027312065,0.0127945645,0.0062281624,0.018896088,0.002326849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010290648,0.000113093105,0.017172035,0.0004969747,0.00007051551,0.0011563887,0.34853294,0.00018230175,0.00070756103,0.08439373,0.4653397,0.08173186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001396435,0.0002073974,0.0396784,0.0045897407,0.00012651618,0.00081115623,0.523218,0.0005968436,0.0010296946,0.069295906,0.3599084,0.00039830044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13983038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27643302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13983038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014514066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03171664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27890205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246233972","doi":"","title":"Resolving Mass Legal Disputes Through Class Arbitration: The United States and Canada Compared","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Supreme court; Compulsory arbitration; Political science; Dispute resolution; Law; Class (philosophy); Federal Arbitration Act; Arbitration clause; Law and economics; Civil procedure; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.054179599218939806,"score_gpt":0.2501517217395624,"score_spread":0.1959721225206226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246233972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40180108,0.011788384,0.0026364133,0.033640172,0.00031666827,0.00016649658,0.00026625636,0.00004624003,0.5493383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770315,0.003725457,0.0013671152,0.0019092466,0.000025795447,0.000020393116,0.00007251767,0.000013440864,0.015834633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949285,0.0006749401,0.00010347768,0.00026488592,0.0019302084,0.0020980698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968335,0.00082598825,0.00020110371,0.00011242896,0.0014751074,0.0005519269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027597148,0.00016174463,0.00040315342,0.0023334436,0.014510234,0.008851675,0.0013612846,0.0019814228,0.0053668967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009435599,0.00024358493,0.0003064782,0.0040854383,0.0058723046,0.001988023,0.0028123907,0.0019296473,0.00019384464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021682706,0.000083066996,0.020739743,0.00027298977,0.00007874734,0.00093769794,0.03593938,0.0035533293,0.00073283334,0.78620017,0.030874893,0.12037035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019949167,0.00011416612,0.105845645,0.0013244052,0.00028473086,0.0005239445,0.16178381,0.007598868,0.0026360615,0.0659392,0.65342695,0.00032274882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99079424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99681973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08411369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08411369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.112724945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6102904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251065692","doi":"","title":"Beyond Hospital Misbehavior: An Alternative Account of Medical Related Financial Distress","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Debtor; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Wrongdoing; Obligation; Health care; Debt; Business; Suspect; Incentive; Actuarial science; Finance; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.05364013270014764,"score_gpt":0.3286993493604173,"score_spread":0.27505921666026967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251065692","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0909161,0.00862896,0.012378174,0.60921705,0.0018145178,0.00008647717,0.00032834776,0.00010555497,0.27652487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592393,0.0022293665,0.001277178,0.026824478,0.0021733856,0.00004589313,0.0000695181,0.000039070386,0.008101837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941048,0.0030807192,0.00024759868,0.00052361534,0.000811519,0.0012318246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98071927,0.008568149,0.0051266397,0.002336487,0.0018036594,0.0014457216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005195213,0.0004949409,0.00039354427,0.0030874014,0.006126729,0.009230648,0.0019494486,0.012397567,0.0076164114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037606057,0.00029840248,0.0005007479,0.0029638729,0.02904958,0.016348599,0.0077325883,0.010904323,0.00050286343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004340429,0.000033002583,0.009763769,0.000044441178,0.00001563522,0.002238638,0.016372817,0.0003211054,0.00004844551,0.92883277,0.031292897,0.010993111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004464379,0.000061893756,0.011157607,0.0008979237,0.000041847314,0.0058327885,0.050520245,0.0042917184,0.00021481316,0.7256113,0.20120119,0.00012406956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007512486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00572963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012397567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005323717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003584508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038626492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542214041","doi":"","title":"Keeping the Promise of Public Fiduciary Theory: A Reply to Leib and Galoob","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Private law; Sociology; Public law; Duty","score_opus":0.09025192314591357,"score_gpt":0.356500903930992,"score_spread":0.2662489807850784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542214041","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009871238,0.030910905,0.0013012328,0.94160336,0.0026736637,0.0000057810757,0.00004431551,0.000022253698,0.022451416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2043177,0.045221247,0.0027135387,0.6893071,0.025265481,0.00013627819,0.000088059925,0.00024894328,0.03270166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912736,0.004375383,0.00022305864,0.0012297429,0.002167512,0.0007307589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793753,0.017149027,0.000468435,0.0009372007,0.001439803,0.0006303205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016485894,0.0010914053,0.0020625885,0.0027385512,0.010558831,0.013320578,0.0044960487,0.041731507,0.007317054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026823077,0.00078731927,0.0012999536,0.0030747603,0.07141319,0.035508145,0.0075035538,0.036049362,0.002070272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008301401,0.00000968233,0.00003228816,0.000024061046,0.0000027824567,0.00003117103,0.00052695535,0.00006691698,0.000008541782,0.936857,0.06081953,0.0016127432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026840466,0.000005413607,0.000071017916,0.00019885316,0.000004099653,0.000036792066,0.00051192177,0.00017868448,0.000032899836,0.8757325,0.1231864,0.00001468621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014998333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01334552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041731507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016953127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009817875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12300414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554110004","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Twenty-Five Years of the Gulf of Maine Judgment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maritime boundary; International court; Boundary (topology); Settlement (finance); Continental shelf; Geography; Treaty; Oceanography; Political science; Square (algebra); United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; International law; Law; Fishery; Public international law; Geology; Business","score_opus":0.010476754427811142,"score_gpt":0.25173321224738604,"score_spread":0.2412564578195749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554110004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04111133,0.12135733,0.0014551241,0.28001457,0.017212568,0.00011188672,0.0021333306,0.00014406093,0.53645974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27999592,0.03399081,0.001027451,0.1063966,0.004947603,0.0001418621,0.001480315,0.0001779122,0.5718415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980332,0.0003931627,0.00010577058,0.0002482379,0.0008874849,0.00033221603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956464,0.0015438845,0.00022475804,0.00020506201,0.0021087814,0.00027109677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003252292,0.0002875885,0.00018585504,0.0019695603,0.006219471,0.006537496,0.000901497,0.003569071,0.0099149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105511565,0.0002594079,0.00023169657,0.0025055849,0.0047357935,0.0039039948,0.0027056243,0.0034135105,0.0017400931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030437046,0.000021596274,0.0023945926,0.00021864969,0.00000795966,0.00027810517,0.018375225,0.0001137248,0.0003656546,0.1652997,0.77747905,0.03541535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011964514,0.000006391766,0.0033778215,0.00027341637,0.0000024154122,0.00003596711,0.002989579,0.000015000073,0.00008401902,0.0020097687,0.99119544,0.000008953067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19411054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33337077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19411054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01373232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008247163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3859614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767332693","doi":"","title":"California's Climate Diplomacy and Dormant Preemption","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commerce Clause; Supreme court; Diplomacy; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Government (linguistics); Dormant Commerce Clause; China; Power (physics); Governor; Foreign policy; Treaty; Federalism; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.05349167589899685,"score_gpt":0.3903065535542201,"score_spread":0.3368148776552233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767332693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040121593,0.0031650728,0.0015193942,0.055554625,0.0023058003,0.00005864455,0.0005454959,0.00018063156,0.8965488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5221462,0.0025353553,0.0014851022,0.05245118,0.0013636235,0.00013752337,0.00049838575,0.00014200782,0.4192406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984842,0.00013945425,0.000046729234,0.00033925942,0.00043911726,0.00055123726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998563,0.00043534685,0.00012810348,0.00017210955,0.00026085175,0.0004407202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017333092,0.00024488266,0.00028811075,0.0004654983,0.0064433264,0.006485415,0.0010335285,0.003310004,0.014885918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031852908,0.00048646427,0.0003182079,0.00040107802,0.003568562,0.0016254399,0.0024118654,0.00780272,0.00162693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098486336,0.0000939695,0.002384596,0.000091502174,0.00001093991,0.00058498705,0.0016821154,0.00045488466,0.0005265707,0.6075246,0.36600456,0.020542812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000756587,0.00004009162,0.0040066936,0.00012104913,0.0000140131215,0.0000852794,0.00045949256,0.00027207265,0.0005867554,0.019045519,0.97524875,0.000044640336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.170232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2583695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.170232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070210444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011671874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33848226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980143916","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Women Under the Law: The False Promise of Human Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05406308912076459,"score_gpt":0.2805880973273655,"score_spread":0.22652500820660093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980143916","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002639222,0.73632586,0.0004994238,0.095904015,0.03933344,0.000042930456,0.00015332317,0.00007420987,0.12740286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050223023,0.6968503,0.00060629915,0.04787826,0.02610615,0.00008766839,0.0002482987,0.00010522705,0.22309554],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876094,0.00027811303,0.000048006,0.000115787356,0.00072571053,0.000071532966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963529,0.00226587,0.00019236564,0.00009422309,0.0009107214,0.00018382548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008515551,0.00078747835,0.0010458824,0.002365102,0.0014492597,0.004240854,0.0012172253,0.0033101959,0.030405624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047565675,0.0004624389,0.00026742494,0.004894717,0.0026236686,0.0035338018,0.0008744873,0.0038075496,0.016560398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047982076,0.0000038985354,0.000023695577,0.00032375247,0.0000027527078,0.000017101498,0.00007188535,0.00003686579,0.000029003675,0.0050134007,0.96804965,0.026423221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030418842,0.0000071322997,0.00016645594,0.0008363272,0.0000037233103,0.00009121311,0.00008972511,0.00002129874,0.00001846872,0.0018328157,0.9969254,0.0000043732716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013895014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03696938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030405624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003629768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004334236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101716876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212354004","doi":"","title":"More Sorry Than Safe: Assessing the Precautionary Principle and the Proposed International Biosafety Protocol","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biosafety; Precautionary principle; Convention on Biological Diversity; Harm; Negotiation; Protocol (science); International regime; Political science; Convention; Conference of the parties; Montreal Protocol; Law and economics; Business; International trade; Biotechnology; Law; Economics; Biodiversity; Biology; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.043213879979909886,"score_gpt":0.3523322020966485,"score_spread":0.3091183221167386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212354004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044184648,0.041428976,0.21175529,0.18811171,0.0038892648,0.0035481055,0.0006132351,0.0001527566,0.50631607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63106835,0.029577505,0.2634717,0.048462898,0.0020043002,0.005468742,0.0005715067,0.00017873793,0.01919625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88921124,0.06252175,0.006471888,0.0037934028,0.033897378,0.0041043344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82424325,0.14172466,0.0102891745,0.0051141535,0.016972687,0.0016561453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.113795735,0.0016868005,0.0015155142,0.010779557,0.004968288,0.020103602,0.004730789,0.018128302,0.005731676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21667533,0.00084244646,0.001796114,0.006969525,0.03002227,0.03492742,0.010499802,0.013615545,0.0007153105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024998542,0.000053267344,0.00092286285,0.0003144661,0.000016508962,0.00006877324,0.0008532604,0.0019496048,0.00008659726,0.9773476,0.00273111,0.015631022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003839499,0.00021508255,0.0016361238,0.0025974917,0.00006569244,0.00015211747,0.0045791864,0.0034745089,0.00069767406,0.9255052,0.060926616,0.00011191928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008030221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077746157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113795735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014204887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033657406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60181653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7060875377","doi":"","title":"An Overview of Canadian Privacy Law for Pharmaceutical and Device Manufacturers Operating in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Privacy law; Privacy policy; Parliament; Legislation; Information privacy; Information privacy law; Government (linguistics); Data Protection Act 1998; Enforcement","score_opus":0.12729459023325193,"score_gpt":0.333884708193535,"score_spread":0.20659011796028307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7060875377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017487602,0.086656,0.0039842823,0.073940895,0.0016778557,0.00065928756,0.0047980687,0.00040562003,0.81039035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34688032,0.20579472,0.02129698,0.06687799,0.0011530673,0.00066075614,0.006883803,0.00035551318,0.35009685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829056,0.0008011166,0.000559887,0.0007783004,0.0112978835,0.0036572467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882116,0.0017422285,0.00052962854,0.00023751466,0.0076489593,0.0016300351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004260188,0.0008557461,0.0005845226,0.009690673,0.019522155,0.012750517,0.0027051575,0.005028896,0.014872023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103780255,0.0009754363,0.0012054461,0.01612706,0.0047872704,0.0029416755,0.002218981,0.004081116,0.0015541685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005295861,0.00008673975,0.007249119,0.0009021838,0.000033382104,0.0015498064,0.0045089144,0.001449577,0.0006298903,0.5395032,0.35203156,0.09200261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011743803,0.000012763397,0.009489173,0.0005087774,0.000024065761,0.00019159554,0.0013709886,0.00045160952,0.00016892307,0.004278792,0.9834187,0.00007284084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99571556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99618405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27548784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27548784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41229272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84033144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}