{"meta":{"query_hash":"27a81af7ef4a","filters":{"venue":"Family Court Review"},"cohort_total":97,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":97,"exported":97,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/27a81af7ef4a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Family+Court+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1481274874","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00651.x","title":"UNIFIED FAMILY COURTS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Family court; Law; State (computer science); Family law; Locality; Domestic violence; Political science; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Computer science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.049079225151470625,"score_gpt":0.3549844254956223,"score_spread":0.3059052003441517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481274874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09058506,0.10038116,0.07235702,0.035088416,0.0048659765,0.0026550866,0.0029883632,0.0015125255,0.6895664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7334485,0.021412127,0.05998863,0.016706945,0.0012512982,0.0010821754,0.0017467024,0.00018467433,0.16417904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771886,0.006836578,0.0022562393,0.0023061812,0.008881209,0.0025311543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96834385,0.0058705155,0.0022947027,0.0032697204,0.017538903,0.0026821578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014400341,0.00030306412,0.00074097794,0.004329621,0.0053675915,0.0059675286,0.0035629224,0.0037020994,0.010176044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04033606,0.0006907985,0.00078254304,0.004784102,0.0019525961,0.00472957,0.0033603308,0.0023999321,0.0019077801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008032265,0.00015050833,0.009509426,0.00085998874,0.00009715352,0.0013342198,0.0037926573,0.002122616,0.0012663471,0.52340376,0.17888118,0.27850187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009657655,0.0003368433,0.03332252,0.0014749583,0.00016004474,0.0018269607,0.002273053,0.002861967,0.0012580225,0.03096027,0.9252978,0.00013101008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104376204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.218111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104376204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009209662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029855408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2075373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491038314","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00054.x","title":"TIPPINS AND WITTMANN ASKED THE WRONG QUESTION:. Evaluators May Not be \"Experts,\" But They Can Express Best Interests Opinions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychology; Child custody; Best interests; Family law; Law; Process (computing); Reliability (semiconductor); Resolution (logic); Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08894869586451364,"score_gpt":0.3804127153912334,"score_spread":0.29146401952671974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491038314","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009349885,0.013775,0.008855224,0.93031734,0.009503875,0.00016791125,0.00025310647,0.00009552143,0.027682243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.181864,0.010227096,0.014933735,0.7517663,0.0053445753,0.0004621228,0.00011020474,0.00011830676,0.035173666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913134,0.0034803315,0.0009459763,0.0012537858,0.0022690077,0.00073749083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96179724,0.028868405,0.0011464745,0.0010223016,0.0065270783,0.00063848414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018809928,0.0010670064,0.0012692261,0.0022679542,0.0084461495,0.0071980017,0.0030606322,0.026466293,0.0070826528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067237675,0.0007928012,0.0012479905,0.0016663356,0.014533988,0.013475938,0.0043142047,0.023419566,0.0019404026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008295591,0.00004700787,0.0010569412,0.00032669722,0.000048564398,0.00057946594,0.0075234557,0.0003195048,0.0004933287,0.6163509,0.33044145,0.042729758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009240438,0.00008076689,0.0019905712,0.0011417373,0.000097842174,0.00081595633,0.009346991,0.00094331236,0.0022581147,0.3410482,0.64198124,0.00020279133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017289657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021887494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026466293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006039044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070607723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09947759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537039636","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01322.x","title":"VAN DUZER MEMORIAL ORATION: THE EFFECT OF ARMED CONFLICT ON CHILD HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Government (linguistics); Armed conflict; Health care; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Economic growth; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.06207673110957574,"score_gpt":0.4272738624347511,"score_spread":0.36519713132517534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537039636","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037851913,0.9222796,0.00006841287,0.03491162,0.0041224337,0.000019728832,0.00004967132,0.000003499004,0.034759924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07419199,0.8952263,0.00018234852,0.0056547076,0.0031202228,0.000028248849,0.00005931049,0.000005886485,0.021530943],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883,0.00073106936,0.000056118577,0.000050655708,0.000243841,0.00008830915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819666,0.0010931541,0.0001568873,0.000034392087,0.0003732847,0.0001456891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015200487,0.0001877446,0.00021640866,0.0009245957,0.00072293525,0.0010688942,0.00040728936,0.0009499983,0.007899522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039470675,0.00008059134,0.00013964114,0.00088543486,0.0009769199,0.0006434915,0.0010023109,0.00087840605,0.0005287386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019791919,0.000078066754,0.0058760815,0.008520826,0.000099653684,0.0028457425,0.004022654,0.00027574843,0.00093543786,0.06070972,0.3444403,0.57199794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013661014,0.00010956879,0.0107849315,0.005383237,0.000029384426,0.0013519524,0.0020894117,0.000032014614,0.00036777416,0.0023042765,0.9775224,0.000011489342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016334863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03222994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016334863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015876633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032013906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032479584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553239706","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00664.x","title":"ELIJAH AND ISHMAEL","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04656544069678336,"score_gpt":0.3466051547816502,"score_spread":0.30003971408486685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553239706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03895141,0.15886916,0.0016775662,0.13020214,0.0045935013,0.00014917814,0.0005885689,0.00007506623,0.66489345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43176812,0.10333745,0.0027326783,0.09287682,0.0021931874,0.000119589735,0.00055187516,0.000065874694,0.36635447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981184,0.00022731791,0.0000653486,0.00013669382,0.000986447,0.00046575532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975473,0.00058435346,0.00012845946,0.000058952297,0.0014581326,0.00022276049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021513617,0.00023941553,0.00035534237,0.0021266444,0.0047453665,0.003692467,0.00087587367,0.0016109555,0.010678937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00696099,0.00013908512,0.00027181543,0.0016112184,0.0026076648,0.0012937757,0.0015177657,0.0015479177,0.0011871759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011966414,0.00006272414,0.013678588,0.00072781986,0.000049987728,0.0010950395,0.005665087,0.00035448078,0.00049619324,0.34308872,0.42239952,0.21226211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024055482,0.000027856882,0.018023467,0.0008768292,0.00006577096,0.000451856,0.005974137,0.00011447459,0.00050502684,0.01570598,0.9582041,0.000026308297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43783423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61784256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43783423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008259258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020183612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8705715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557713239","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01318.x","title":"THE FIFTH WORLD CONGRESS ON FAMILY LAW AND THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"International Human Rights and Reproductive Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Law; Political science; Family law; Psychology; Sociology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.01771482702825411,"score_gpt":0.2937500995630633,"score_spread":0.2760352725348092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557713239","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018278608,0.1490249,0.0006803173,0.52336997,0.21455805,0.00045890952,0.0014209265,0.00008482292,0.10857424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016700497,0.06176065,0.0019095629,0.62396026,0.07047387,0.0013100762,0.0007876399,0.00016527332,0.22293217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990386,0.0019123368,0.0010342777,0.0007977373,0.0033583,0.0025114212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98912865,0.0051765377,0.0007860307,0.0004966881,0.0031838738,0.0012281835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013818635,0.0020621899,0.0023648017,0.005345481,0.009088279,0.013432753,0.005526853,0.049025252,0.0105361985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025078215,0.0015753028,0.0032603662,0.003960968,0.004843081,0.0061042584,0.0038447692,0.032770813,0.0038667894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003957809,0.00004877836,0.0002654211,0.00034594402,0.000035231948,0.00023007266,0.00041727815,0.00007600976,0.00014679866,0.027257113,0.95989645,0.0112411715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002219867,0.000009907931,0.0014694957,0.0010968408,0.00004589273,0.000045051853,0.00025340184,0.000029162322,0.00009924835,0.002303832,0.99459285,0.0000322042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17360182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2915396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17360182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0149115175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04048755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34518266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579304025","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01446.x","title":"MARRIAGE: CIVIL, RELIGIOUS, CONTRACTUAL, AND MORE*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage law; Law; Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Religious law; Sociology; Judaism; Political science; State (computer science); Public law; Islam; History","score_opus":0.03992372588675457,"score_gpt":0.34675615129486087,"score_spread":0.3068324254081063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579304025","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009219238,0.9793896,0.00014134619,0.0073274155,0.0008618093,0.000003572962,0.000005085463,0.0000014051533,0.0113478415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062332723,0.92302674,0.0002954716,0.007737334,0.002608784,0.000025695203,0.0000319337,0.0000045420347,0.0039368086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944482,0.003414556,0.00038193795,0.00031610244,0.0011631926,0.00027595513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690944,0.0016021514,0.00041797291,0.00017691658,0.0006945859,0.00019894452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042871065,0.00036190267,0.000801017,0.0030238302,0.0020894313,0.0045717154,0.00086790783,0.0025415558,0.0029921134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004390108,0.00029781903,0.00037074642,0.0046436377,0.01097023,0.0062544513,0.0021171535,0.002302175,0.00049403124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069830676,0.00007948945,0.0015451445,0.00618536,0.000080457736,0.00024481682,0.011427047,0.00027975655,0.00026724322,0.5535479,0.047706146,0.37856677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002025586,0.00010907919,0.0042491425,0.006692019,0.00004354299,0.00047191195,0.009123375,0.000059763166,0.00008103201,0.05220414,0.9269235,0.000022156682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01630576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023458747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01630576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034328746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007139087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03242165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579884250","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01441.x","title":"SAME SEX, DIFFERENT RIGHTS: AMENDING U.S. IMMIGRATION LAW TO RECOGNIZE SAME‐SEX PARTNERS OF REFUGEES AND ASYLEES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Refugee; Persecution; Legislation; Immigration law; Political science; Law; Immigration reform; Population; Refugee law; Sociology; Politics; Demography","score_opus":0.03907273651068179,"score_gpt":0.35761914716710147,"score_spread":0.3185464106564197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579884250","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06733543,0.17240599,0.005248432,0.4615369,0.013726865,0.00045842488,0.00024182118,0.00012195738,0.27892414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57341343,0.056173563,0.008003541,0.305572,0.003764006,0.00044848057,0.00022990504,0.000070284616,0.052324776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808881,0.007791597,0.0021979315,0.0014704264,0.005177508,0.0024744954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9594116,0.026850792,0.0018745216,0.0015855348,0.008967012,0.0013104891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032873593,0.00036874463,0.00075972336,0.0029323131,0.012215069,0.010875407,0.00284747,0.021470666,0.0016800434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046899553,0.0008326807,0.0010219476,0.0020820284,0.01197876,0.0072408486,0.0038885286,0.015832264,0.0005090701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030344714,0.00009634641,0.0026066615,0.00041857763,0.000021229287,0.001060623,0.012035467,0.00042632723,0.00069154816,0.8344795,0.10441154,0.043721683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081476486,0.00014128821,0.008007711,0.0035910872,0.00013470148,0.0005792762,0.011157532,0.0007443425,0.0012782649,0.07621934,0.89791495,0.00014991764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21310389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33510092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21310389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013215571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42372698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582480376","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01319.x","title":"TOWARD THE DIFFERENTIATION OF HIGH‐CONFLICT FAMILIES: AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND CANADIAN CASE LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child and Adolescent Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Alienation; Economic Justice; Identification (biology); Law; Social conflict; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.16161973708148575,"score_gpt":0.4801000534582291,"score_spread":0.31848031637674334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582480376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25101557,0.16343589,0.008669807,0.13560651,0.00046454708,0.0016766326,0.0010024408,0.000058295685,0.43807024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94701993,0.032761082,0.007507818,0.005054904,0.000105185434,0.00047506994,0.00035407813,0.000034836117,0.006686969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94285065,0.01846864,0.0030461617,0.0020488307,0.025046516,0.00853914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9077788,0.04200558,0.0064194375,0.0015871011,0.038313273,0.003895749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047107425,0.00078277313,0.0013851185,0.050229084,0.028452663,0.016072027,0.0064550503,0.0035710891,0.0029598032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10118696,0.00081009127,0.0012238141,0.055538982,0.029733945,0.005900901,0.008660943,0.0032308917,0.00012621832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017450811,0.000030966818,0.014297065,0.00067380065,0.000041440908,0.0006120263,0.06838822,0.0005162133,0.00008175782,0.87235934,0.010162513,0.032819286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007877419,0.0000579846,0.19997549,0.0074518276,0.0003217369,0.0010695745,0.26023763,0.0050591687,0.0004192366,0.22446474,0.30056038,0.00030343304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9842316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31321597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31321597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32318237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79657215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604588040","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12050","title":"Family Life, Parental Separation, and Child Custody in Canada: a Focus on Quebec","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Child custody; Family law; Context (archaeology); Dispute resolution; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Criminology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.019373300075626508,"score_gpt":0.2777592548116963,"score_spread":0.2583859547360698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604588040","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30924362,0.6715225,0.00015892183,0.0075567923,0.00025308607,0.000066828965,0.0014352128,0.000011874457,0.0097511755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7037507,0.28889024,0.00041106192,0.001654415,0.00011539071,0.00005273161,0.0008669073,0.0000084586645,0.004250109],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911326,0.0002018283,0.000049465343,0.000103818624,0.00029383803,0.00023786267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964651,0.00068363844,0.00044832262,0.00004815929,0.0017811151,0.0005736589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016505914,0.00039992388,0.0006230866,0.0025852087,0.00377295,0.0024689846,0.0010815648,0.0006542079,0.0019321752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003660695,0.00018787103,0.0006891996,0.0077908575,0.0013824195,0.0005705596,0.0007643677,0.00071950315,0.00009553044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055707013,0.0002920235,0.65181357,0.0057776337,0.0010029237,0.001121075,0.02064612,0.0015593893,0.0006944513,0.011338439,0.026540875,0.27865642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002754588,0.00013796064,0.93328655,0.004206788,0.0006207989,0.00032937885,0.015043994,0.0004674169,0.00017172526,0.00032661355,0.0453077,0.00007349268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061093695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061093695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09677828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44326788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1784500953","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00632.x","title":"CRITICAL ASPECTS OF PARENTING PLANS FOR YOUNG CHILDREN","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Developmental psychology; Schedule","score_opus":0.039468604095096504,"score_gpt":0.34500906634214906,"score_spread":0.30554046224705256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1784500953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93230164,0.040042896,0.0006750356,0.0036380817,0.00012264225,0.000025679743,0.00012297064,0.0000077161285,0.023063216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99117637,0.0076009124,0.00036558494,0.00007886851,0.00004970774,0.000007662894,0.000035469446,0.000001788229,0.00068361417],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992939,0.00043213193,0.00004444636,0.000030521147,0.00013503009,0.00006384839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747545,0.0009807338,0.00094982755,0.000090198635,0.00025142712,0.00025235052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011883983,0.000077218385,0.000111938134,0.00045998392,0.00046731418,0.00070105714,0.00019827303,0.00017727967,0.000828147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008061,0.000097870674,0.00011417366,0.00043789615,0.0005963322,0.00034691708,0.00036430656,0.00034812535,0.000045100558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016082315,0.000058731115,0.6022099,0.000621689,0.000070631955,0.0023156272,0.021420943,0.00067933835,0.0014685126,0.016174866,0.0054450384,0.34937388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008048319,0.00020464804,0.934495,0.0005345999,0.000042216852,0.002573671,0.014577426,0.00013640588,0.0002810561,0.0041033844,0.04302682,0.000016765565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007098048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018680679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007098048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068244204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013588914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014113486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1788428164","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00635.x","title":"PARENT EDUCATION AFTER SEPARATION/DIVORCE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Separation (statistics); Developmental psychology; Parent education; Social psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.03450573828765361,"score_gpt":0.37235365306068247,"score_spread":0.33784791477302883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1788428164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82626384,0.15152998,0.00034313372,0.002631008,0.00030406646,0.0003736042,0.00036961204,0.000035540615,0.018149186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89774567,0.092695996,0.0010582723,0.0009062188,0.00014892462,0.00018158424,0.00047358262,0.000005442508,0.0067843306],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996331,0.00014895396,0.000019396628,0.00002566332,0.00009755484,0.00007527691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991204,0.00018170942,0.00017516603,0.000024549585,0.00019637188,0.00030173062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086682435,0.00008800542,0.00027697926,0.0005951761,0.0005390332,0.00023596545,0.0004576537,0.00031751272,0.0019350115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031329156,0.00006238203,0.00015864332,0.0004916705,0.00006936099,0.00012444743,0.00031063837,0.00033288563,0.00018789987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011053778,0.002336831,0.03687718,0.0017601181,0.00010255674,0.0007400053,0.0013379595,0.00016672991,0.00047689013,0.00032381105,0.00615087,0.94862163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020984092,0.013331852,0.8530149,0.008218256,0.00069262326,0.0033951153,0.0044325413,0.00028164,0.0019708902,0.0005090626,0.11202259,0.000032139997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058650274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16922341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058650274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009744592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003430238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1166178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814157025","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00667.x","title":"THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Seriousness; Legislature; Political science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Criticism; Psychology","score_opus":0.06187454347855731,"score_gpt":0.35745765721547534,"score_spread":0.29558311373691804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814157025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05244196,0.040282406,0.0027237248,0.042491686,0.0042451834,0.002824666,0.024082454,0.0005373246,0.8303705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30026197,0.028791992,0.0060004895,0.07750316,0.0006007844,0.0023593586,0.015916478,0.00008666196,0.5684792],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947174,0.00034637604,0.00024541005,0.00026542798,0.0029913234,0.001434087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957344,0.00028688373,0.00022014313,0.0001190838,0.0029337723,0.0007056824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023589188,0.0005328054,0.00043047214,0.002452203,0.0052519166,0.0031746242,0.001445543,0.002332689,0.0045815166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006741004,0.00036328292,0.0004234611,0.002620212,0.001595214,0.0005877757,0.0015075991,0.0022566929,0.0014652099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000753419,0.000093394505,0.015753293,0.0004757751,0.000034528133,0.00068109826,0.0047355653,0.0004350467,0.0007876521,0.18708354,0.67806077,0.11178395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020911551,0.000039252674,0.044473495,0.00042290206,0.000028108889,0.00014788538,0.001014439,0.00013754572,0.00023736822,0.0011956473,0.9522547,0.000027811257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9802066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04119325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04119325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1521559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29887933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868345552","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2000.tb00553.x","title":"THE SECOND ANNUAL MEYER ELKIN ADDRESS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Honor; Queen (butterfly); Conciliation; Wright; Law; Management; Sociology; Library science; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.03615540671168817,"score_gpt":0.3405818266283443,"score_spread":0.30442641991665614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868345552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00081310247,0.007865242,0.00045091182,0.016887167,0.08222251,0.0000993573,0.001440322,0.0005659019,0.8896553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014065212,0.001804926,0.00010941683,0.0016462604,0.0050630397,0.000026059386,0.00034418752,0.00017815271,0.98942137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986488,0.00012429497,0.000054702126,0.00024794062,0.0006889414,0.00023540232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850166,0.0001058394,0.00008465165,0.000096382944,0.00058120314,0.00063027063],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009042188,0.0014324016,0.0006695594,0.0016474145,0.0030435913,0.006675919,0.001037563,0.0026559972,0.61342806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028893831,0.000438046,0.00048120963,0.0009018166,0.00066011964,0.003383301,0.003920091,0.002930614,0.5007536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012060758,0.000012103518,0.00005752215,0.000026677573,7.861258e-7,0.00004359792,0.000017174129,0.000009064554,0.000103394224,0.00090430555,0.9827231,0.016090171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014033355,0.0000051011843,0.000098718825,0.000029017525,3.8084113e-7,0.00003290491,0.000023818819,0.000008035812,0.000028229251,0.00011072138,0.9996599,0.0000017335509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002206454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055485144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61342806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021326635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026923108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5513979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1894907231","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12081","title":"A Presumption Against Shared Parenting for Family Court Litigants","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Coaching; Presumption; Compromise; Psychological intervention; Domestic violence; Adversarial system; SAFER; Social psychology; Criminology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.06379233560967743,"score_gpt":0.36209997075991723,"score_spread":0.29830763515023984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1894907231","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049518417,0.11853404,0.012622068,0.7883886,0.019933544,0.00020640921,0.00025967628,0.000102071666,0.05500174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19544291,0.10356391,0.015844306,0.6566521,0.012589407,0.0011203327,0.00015261151,0.00010375985,0.014530664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9266074,0.035613526,0.009707144,0.008672015,0.01631332,0.003086656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7892828,0.16955699,0.009883965,0.011440271,0.016204445,0.0036316058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08260631,0.0005767321,0.0016865236,0.002063795,0.005032989,0.008612913,0.006446609,0.02371919,0.005677063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15154065,0.0008559516,0.0019787315,0.0017982466,0.032040603,0.0129827,0.006205772,0.047704242,0.0029755405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016273695,0.00011731859,0.0017030843,0.0063532316,0.00020049352,0.0013821602,0.0062004384,0.0005006075,0.0007706454,0.73716176,0.15947683,0.08597075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017138464,0.000386811,0.0023692923,0.027475283,0.0002777137,0.002272425,0.0038042117,0.00036947007,0.0012893025,0.17105795,0.79041076,0.00011538901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010628912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011273761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08260631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005556716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018326746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43686914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897283657","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00883.x","title":"FAMILY/CHILD JUDICIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION (JDR)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Family court; Dispute resolution; Law; Welfare; Political science; Family law; Alternative dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Best interests; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.04793670436161205,"score_gpt":0.3351885406590122,"score_spread":0.28725183629740014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897283657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20025147,0.08320971,0.027547134,0.023764994,0.0037685335,0.004061668,0.001009687,0.0003209822,0.65606576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8671064,0.014575727,0.014002589,0.008693858,0.0005689643,0.00075544097,0.00049693027,0.000054020267,0.09374608],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985859,0.0054313736,0.00091760827,0.0012234679,0.004835334,0.0017331806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828668,0.009904809,0.0010893601,0.0008972368,0.0044213207,0.0008204917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025078949,0.0002024695,0.00045515207,0.0019771548,0.005656238,0.0044139214,0.0022908943,0.0026370964,0.00580579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029338436,0.00033027644,0.0003620897,0.0016011823,0.0024759104,0.0013049763,0.0031556094,0.0023400935,0.00086573965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016181855,0.00040251328,0.008080791,0.002100451,0.000044072563,0.002340432,0.010629038,0.0009223886,0.0023720127,0.27074948,0.119988404,0.58220863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013681517,0.0006903148,0.020951526,0.0009252757,0.00007903106,0.0017707462,0.0062740487,0.0007664538,0.0050068586,0.016580777,0.9467526,0.00006544854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050176527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11059841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050176527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052773724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017642876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13263178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1898085152","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01358.x","title":"PARENT EDUCATION PROGRAMS IN FAMILY COURTS: BALANCING AUTONOMY AND STATE INTERVENTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Autonomy; Intervention (counseling); State (computer science); Psychology; Child custody; Work (physics); Medical education; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Medicine; Criminology; Computer science; Psychiatry; Engineering","score_opus":0.0942847539749596,"score_gpt":0.32952984793602824,"score_spread":0.23524509396106863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1898085152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64332765,0.16596745,0.0064205453,0.045645833,0.0012977448,0.0006704033,0.00006981949,0.000098112294,0.13650241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97551435,0.01565326,0.0016038577,0.0029653197,0.000221974,0.00019414298,0.00002217473,0.0000056094036,0.0038192158],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993604,0.0047144517,0.00019886302,0.0003226284,0.0006937005,0.0004663574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913639,0.0066320896,0.00071985705,0.00024443064,0.000424149,0.0006155526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057173944,0.00011223153,0.00022589031,0.00071654096,0.0017401701,0.0021005536,0.0011438325,0.0024012728,0.0023218233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013158123,0.00012300901,0.00023802121,0.0006312801,0.001390207,0.0013891886,0.0019774626,0.0018772851,0.00011858562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030273065,0.0021625883,0.010928195,0.002462163,0.00011099431,0.00075584534,0.0070734415,0.0031027952,0.0012576513,0.21708295,0.009270027,0.7454906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032795337,0.008646161,0.16691235,0.030590123,0.0010826653,0.0027923489,0.026988532,0.0061332895,0.01292902,0.13971671,0.6007192,0.00021015722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055900416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019396557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057173944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021027375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006940475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03023684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915731202","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01325.x","title":"NEGLECTED INFANTS IN FAMILY COURT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"South Health Campus; Alberta Health Services","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Intervention (counseling); Child neglect; Psychology; Mental health; Best interests; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry; Child abuse; Medicine; Political science; Law; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.028130683886326953,"score_gpt":0.32577727808352647,"score_spread":0.2976465941971995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915731202","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17295854,0.5838383,0.0015509926,0.13530959,0.006580654,0.00014423094,0.000095296644,0.000030877218,0.09949162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7285996,0.23273174,0.0012382972,0.020159949,0.0023688748,0.00009448427,0.000069203015,0.00001946553,0.014718259],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949463,0.0030485764,0.0003574638,0.00024475544,0.0009104627,0.0004925061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99025214,0.0055115772,0.0015433104,0.00019029499,0.0014896202,0.0010129624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006109407,0.00019293372,0.00052254146,0.0010338865,0.0040451465,0.0026144225,0.000811623,0.00312575,0.0037261138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026743654,0.00020204023,0.00021501623,0.0010061389,0.0018046631,0.0017385472,0.002123927,0.0023921337,0.00032509348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027969273,0.00024332752,0.027272837,0.0047854693,0.00013896593,0.08727226,0.04430314,0.0010593901,0.0012131247,0.13205466,0.15636739,0.54500973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004852918,0.00050933886,0.027936807,0.009711221,0.0001364688,0.06549457,0.041923616,0.00019013464,0.0010083747,0.030141698,0.82281184,0.00008751546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008675744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035930585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008675744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003073844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065233023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03231001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964254585","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00044.x","title":"ADOLESCENTS’ VIEWS ON THE FAIRNESS OF PARENTING AND FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS AFTER SEPARATION","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Separation (statistics); Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.05105035142021946,"score_gpt":0.33546914154154006,"score_spread":0.2844187901213206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964254585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944028,0.00081319525,0.000105021034,0.0009872393,0.000016515674,0.0000092226965,0.000011865826,9.1816383e-7,0.003653219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988286,0.0004399095,0.0000591723,0.00012365365,0.0000075867847,0.0000047219096,0.0000066309126,8.358912e-7,0.00052884297],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943264,0.0037650082,0.0003119754,0.00013347252,0.0008827075,0.00058042497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873374,0.005125947,0.0043238057,0.00021071288,0.001619293,0.001382802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009621767,0.00009232432,0.00032143993,0.0008037251,0.0026140334,0.0019660597,0.00033583082,0.000695142,0.0011282552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015294645,0.0002309859,0.00026349243,0.00057240203,0.002403804,0.001023351,0.0014777931,0.0015701446,0.000081451726],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016237317,0.000057359546,0.18102407,0.0001295567,0.000032713608,0.0018007077,0.7904689,0.00011402979,0.0011369308,0.004247667,0.0006194513,0.020206252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023431792,0.00030005336,0.27865407,0.00040896243,0.000044760018,0.0016811361,0.7012957,0.00017233772,0.00062946783,0.0010052299,0.015740847,0.00004402164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023961838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035941448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023961838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023717857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019903688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05088538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964793103","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00218.x","title":"DIVORCE AND THE FAMILY COURT: WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.038460929768102746,"score_gpt":0.32735764048435173,"score_spread":0.288896710716249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964793103","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006862521,0.97541034,0.000044915338,0.021867787,0.00054364797,0.000004370205,0.000013875019,0.000002102869,0.0014266674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077303327,0.9887983,0.00007117103,0.0022313457,0.0009634474,0.00000620556,0.000013124624,0.0000012329555,0.00018484019],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971813,0.0016480453,0.0002296586,0.00016177991,0.00061986805,0.00015936003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806855,0.013444399,0.0016528198,0.00033114516,0.0028588888,0.00102735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059075085,0.00034327203,0.0018403277,0.0019032358,0.0013284873,0.0038546843,0.001379153,0.0045246333,0.005204048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023967862,0.00035679524,0.00077797665,0.0024668775,0.002747072,0.0058963206,0.0012740564,0.0035319836,0.0008576497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017618279,0.00018283022,0.008099653,0.01475389,0.00033152703,0.0007811703,0.0019308333,0.00021468032,0.0000681125,0.007775977,0.042684063,0.9230012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020903564,0.00081058615,0.105252646,0.11694355,0.0011450906,0.00696962,0.022936849,0.00030225547,0.00021822217,0.0320203,0.7129595,0.00023219084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0350987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062395852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0350987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018947049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008447572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06978881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965852444","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00139.x","title":"ROCK‐PAPER‐SCISSORS: PLAYING THE ODDS WITH THE LAW OF CHILD RELOCATION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Settlement (finance); Jurisdiction; Law; Adversarial system; Odds; Duty; Process (computing); Proposition; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.021213584404343063,"score_gpt":0.3040934368450104,"score_spread":0.2828798524406673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965852444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1172285,0.027456809,0.033214822,0.22458462,0.0015808975,0.00016370999,0.0000688019,0.00014537107,0.59555644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92029977,0.0068541206,0.0066888668,0.022335228,0.0005661127,0.00009739713,0.000026467847,0.00008529402,0.043046705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98460084,0.007231555,0.0006281326,0.0012259263,0.004559284,0.0017542229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888426,0.008102571,0.0009362605,0.000691147,0.0009984955,0.0004288625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012988304,0.0002682907,0.00046412167,0.0012588265,0.0077588176,0.010000324,0.0021237826,0.007816004,0.0060385885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031623285,0.00044539946,0.0007312476,0.00095309486,0.026523527,0.008073905,0.004651437,0.008478173,0.00080271205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014824107,0.000010014893,0.001409539,0.000057096866,0.0000072977978,0.00082596566,0.0035653873,0.0003698203,0.00011353433,0.9714192,0.0090766065,0.013130696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004710635,0.00015012943,0.004087064,0.001181656,0.00005793738,0.0018816709,0.019881755,0.0014677818,0.0012748777,0.4636496,0.5062332,0.00008725595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03783778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0779049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03783778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059635616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010409915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07523507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972185549","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01278.x","title":"WHERE IS THE JUSTICE? PARENTAL EXPERIENCES OF THE CANADIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CASES OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE*","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Child sexual abuse; CITES; Criminology; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Sexual assault; Restorative justice; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Political science; Medicine; Law; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03433389715955994,"score_gpt":0.3123407924780015,"score_spread":0.2780068953184416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972185549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834273,0.0028859538,0.00011718493,0.0033294302,0.00005997562,0.000019559042,0.00006538254,0.0000041968697,0.010091025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670047,0.0019075904,0.00008029176,0.00019955033,0.000007726928,0.00000497511,0.000019936133,0.0000026416765,0.001076658],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751306,0.000940847,0.000108811066,0.000107483094,0.0005567252,0.0007731041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99584335,0.0013896066,0.00082533224,0.00014070867,0.0010971893,0.0007038628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026909553,0.00021972804,0.00032748,0.00093861535,0.013843786,0.0034549008,0.0009864038,0.00088240375,0.0018307266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010719789,0.00038014844,0.00017863425,0.0019227547,0.0061864695,0.0013892191,0.0023112162,0.0015722398,0.00007976302],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045823712,0.000017997714,0.030805772,0.00006889097,0.000008715585,0.0023759264,0.95223635,0.000036267247,0.00034862588,0.0029749153,0.0014777723,0.009602897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018487112,0.000016818194,0.034705076,0.00011252175,0.000007749376,0.00085185934,0.95315754,0.00002109764,0.000100795485,0.00012978488,0.010874815,0.000020096575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86334544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92786217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13665456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01941074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024707206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27491862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977315401","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00663.x","title":"IS THE TURN TOWARD COLLABORATIVE LAW A TURN AWAY FROM JUSTICE?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law and economics; Law; Individualism; Private law; Power (physics); Sociology; Public law; Political science","score_opus":0.04771668560999327,"score_gpt":0.3491699588710791,"score_spread":0.30145327326108584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977315401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069228793,0.036483794,0.013646754,0.8395524,0.0023532154,0.00003786476,0.000037867394,0.00006943591,0.100895695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6669054,0.038764775,0.019035466,0.24242604,0.0070080967,0.00024452145,0.0000712332,0.00015905488,0.025385408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9584314,0.019514274,0.0011523875,0.0042605377,0.011990449,0.0046509337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9453626,0.030657874,0.003566434,0.004034916,0.009990751,0.0063874833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03324645,0.00033999328,0.0009233702,0.0020228857,0.011689,0.016735127,0.0033624186,0.012652803,0.006099117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063153125,0.00035016827,0.0009246899,0.0023173753,0.037490454,0.017832179,0.007474936,0.01271511,0.0010652518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006219857,0.000017146376,0.0002673954,0.0001072935,0.000008366564,0.000060487426,0.0025699644,0.000104882645,0.000040130562,0.9522329,0.026774097,0.017811207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002913379,0.000043530436,0.0009862157,0.0006278422,0.000017486884,0.00017490346,0.005095668,0.00029986328,0.00015823422,0.62151915,0.37102216,0.000025726838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09311849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095056124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09311849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023133963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048905797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18515295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982245255","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.00242.x","title":"BUILDING A CHILD PROTECTION MEDIATION PROGRAM IN BRITISH COLUMBIA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Welfare; Child protection; Process (computing); Welfare system; Scale (ratio); Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.0330844601367085,"score_gpt":0.3062229980821771,"score_spread":0.2731385379454686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982245255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7901716,0.055639114,0.001664795,0.03591978,0.00085577765,0.0033330244,0.00090338313,0.00015595551,0.11135654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9169786,0.031256728,0.0047218665,0.005860116,0.00006778678,0.0008749022,0.0005766373,0.000035849986,0.039627545],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974425,0.0007920843,0.00012297717,0.00017970115,0.000807017,0.0006557298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944929,0.0009651362,0.00025008174,0.00017772288,0.0030959512,0.0010182109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044752345,0.00019252703,0.00027904462,0.001141539,0.005607699,0.0025198811,0.0022464446,0.0013450024,0.003847267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006917091,0.0003556247,0.00017156222,0.0015594943,0.0009146912,0.00073136046,0.0017061416,0.0015668455,0.00036047422],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010471534,0.001484482,0.052868478,0.0055510597,0.00019945134,0.0075843898,0.013286667,0.005031343,0.0103510525,0.03326982,0.06379317,0.805533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010396228,0.0022301103,0.40682235,0.005395447,0.00041695405,0.0013602445,0.042301577,0.0028416773,0.008809779,0.002891025,0.52562696,0.0002643609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9165717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97699124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08342832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038079467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11693998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2762872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999389045","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00666.x","title":"JUDICIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Welfare; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06960463949241635,"score_gpt":0.41601493926083655,"score_spread":0.3464102997684202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999389045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011099524,0.013070032,0.04706965,0.02753711,0.0065052067,0.0017662297,0.00042264033,0.0005215792,0.89200807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2677776,0.008837171,0.037044346,0.020468075,0.0037390008,0.0009940984,0.0007763102,0.00035798125,0.6600054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9636035,0.011984239,0.0031064067,0.004396007,0.012420592,0.0044891876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676399,0.013373284,0.0019131434,0.0045261323,0.01029562,0.002251922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029536378,0.0005175817,0.0010312501,0.0029312507,0.010789106,0.009474153,0.0038322578,0.0061900173,0.044935778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068783045,0.00045469758,0.0009786866,0.0018671144,0.0051140664,0.0042009233,0.00819298,0.0066503803,0.0117384195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039454866,0.00010500209,0.0007312139,0.00027952358,0.000018997605,0.0004968377,0.0034417748,0.00020574886,0.00076021056,0.6176336,0.22213136,0.1541563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002290693,0.00006438545,0.0006108203,0.00037282068,0.00001231266,0.00027228985,0.0017874951,0.00025590975,0.0007359851,0.055687383,0.940153,0.000024725816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006947426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010762822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044935778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062345257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019113198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15620518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013378714","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00179_1.x","title":"JANUARY 2008","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Harm; Government (linguistics); Psychology; Family law; Psychoanalytic theory; Corporal punishment; Child protection; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04003741118325386,"score_gpt":0.3464462065810253,"score_spread":0.30640879539777144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013378714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004428381,0.004857977,0.0004179238,0.028426867,0.06995511,0.00011301135,0.0022303653,0.00074318325,0.89281267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001464716,0.0020109331,0.00024269696,0.010708021,0.006155019,0.000072010254,0.0015859884,0.0002235716,0.9775369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986326,0.00011533916,0.000084756146,0.00022776342,0.0007367377,0.00020269697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985098,0.0001992485,0.000058838235,0.00020606698,0.00078016345,0.00024588048],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011216444,0.00075278874,0.00074186357,0.0011359958,0.00218712,0.008089551,0.0015960132,0.0039239153,0.5158485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047601108,0.00039892303,0.00078050134,0.001028085,0.0006701177,0.0033426846,0.0024969296,0.0034997,0.41634917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105377185,0.000012575547,0.00006828028,0.000056663488,0.0000017607205,0.00002797835,0.000030378613,0.000011599696,0.00005703269,0.003572057,0.97534466,0.020806603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020558698,0.0000038094402,0.00017608333,0.00006361996,7.581292e-7,0.000015036542,0.00003044364,0.000007635038,0.000015084052,0.00028310355,0.9994004,0.0000019341053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047885203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010887816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48415148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023087952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002557059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69058335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014229464","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01287.x","title":"CHILDREN RESISTING POSTSEPARATION CONTACT WITH A PARENT: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES, AND CONUNDRUMS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Resistance (ecology); Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.01342374486595975,"score_gpt":0.3110076863260546,"score_spread":0.2975839414600948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014229464","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077255876,0.8407716,0.0012226114,0.13817792,0.0010913038,0.000019771569,0.00001376546,0.000009091457,0.010968306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12647529,0.8530646,0.0015534287,0.014995906,0.00261091,0.00008609777,0.000019521874,0.000015557607,0.0011787281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845888,0.009595475,0.0012286184,0.0011130119,0.0027921349,0.0006818466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572391,0.036764164,0.0026179568,0.00066775276,0.0021527752,0.0005583525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025550833,0.00048287254,0.0012266571,0.0048140115,0.0040407213,0.008340557,0.0034502822,0.007836634,0.0017486272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030867081,0.0003869833,0.0006058118,0.004792637,0.039081965,0.015142926,0.004951974,0.009935227,0.00027919363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052924315,0.000078235564,0.0026510064,0.006582729,0.000058531507,0.0023390485,0.06771438,0.0003190737,0.00022251878,0.5304833,0.017328134,0.37217012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027878883,0.00017774831,0.0053479983,0.02744707,0.00008049662,0.008294607,0.20686315,0.00027552852,0.0004885851,0.2680023,0.48283637,0.00015837149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077362517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00972026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025550833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069205416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00868854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1351273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018000587","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00909.x","title":"LESSONS LEARNED FROM A CHILD PROTECTION MEDIATION PROGRAM: If At First You Succeed and Then You Don't…","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Thriving; Political science; Psychology; Family mediation; Child protection; Public relations; Law; Alternative dispute resolution","score_opus":0.0593212203700322,"score_gpt":0.32274859335616657,"score_spread":0.2634273729861344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018000587","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026415,0.75763917,0.0004914801,0.21566947,0.0017807271,0.000028616168,0.000014407707,0.000008449023,0.021726139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07063731,0.88005686,0.0017379251,0.041370027,0.0017257127,0.00007966801,0.0000239038,0.000011646782,0.004356908],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.992728,0.004818103,0.0002867599,0.00040873318,0.0013795082,0.00037889634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984743,0.012180744,0.0005255689,0.00026583136,0.0016338115,0.00065106305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010165171,0.00025238327,0.00036233524,0.0010231462,0.0020437457,0.0028600649,0.001226896,0.0038560536,0.0020233844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019475134,0.00018259801,0.0004410046,0.0011607524,0.0052856416,0.005859247,0.001704914,0.008173865,0.00032407168],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000372891,0.00013649583,0.0014362443,0.006273269,0.000049658356,0.0007880514,0.00546025,0.00030657707,0.0001997666,0.2365053,0.10319965,0.6456075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032144515,0.00018378215,0.005262658,0.017311784,0.00005984518,0.0013024055,0.008515252,0.000087860906,0.00022037311,0.028763423,0.93822724,0.000033227003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019890904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033360206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019890904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034290792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013399145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053759217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018036763","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00141.x","title":"ASSESSING THE PARENT–CHILD RELATIONSHIP IN PARENTING CAPACITY EVALUATIONS: CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF ATTACHMENT RESEARCH","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.4869531592217185,"score_gpt":0.592706808589885,"score_spread":0.1057536493681665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018036763","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39304236,0.40420556,0.07409975,0.0165162,0.0018950233,0.004538476,0.00041129207,0.00019042853,0.10510094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7882538,0.1438553,0.061445054,0.00074941706,0.00043914953,0.0027048974,0.0001522921,0.000026703874,0.0023734572],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792548,0.016260987,0.0016476439,0.00029887675,0.0023043617,0.00023336556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95999146,0.02679126,0.0041064923,0.0012544616,0.0067530302,0.0011033248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047994778,0.0005680456,0.0009176115,0.0049496978,0.0011609083,0.0022544533,0.0012063105,0.00091714656,0.0017034562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07050411,0.000311556,0.00041765382,0.0033635804,0.0023634173,0.0029242574,0.0026147407,0.0019619763,0.00036033074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014970895,0.0004528556,0.11780556,0.0039285105,0.0001124053,0.00072465395,0.015105966,0.000533892,0.0011440011,0.009075031,0.004341654,0.8466257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018657045,0.00507795,0.7676096,0.02515361,0.00048025488,0.014044785,0.050045166,0.0037299523,0.00319597,0.04034964,0.0898142,0.00031225072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026375153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008030696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047994778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013147785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033781934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2538237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021215546","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00079.x","title":"THE EVOLUTION—OR END—OF MARRIAGE?: REFLECTIONS ON THE IMPASSE OVER SAME‐SEX MARRIAGE","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Emblem; Appeal; Lesbian; Institution; Complementarity (molecular biology); Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.05775052486679768,"score_gpt":0.372234977833448,"score_spread":0.31448445296665034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021215546","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008824646,0.28535715,0.0011825155,0.6610603,0.0024879565,0.000011624787,0.000013357022,0.0000080886675,0.041054383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48298183,0.26180884,0.0011440794,0.22088733,0.0074751517,0.000064499814,0.00002679519,0.00004904407,0.02556242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97807956,0.015475751,0.0004787231,0.0011770529,0.0030300615,0.0017587967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97047204,0.025188018,0.00089504174,0.00043419655,0.0018816758,0.0011290022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033513293,0.0002575596,0.00085604907,0.0015068522,0.008860951,0.013826312,0.0023412749,0.017670931,0.0038558454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025439098,0.00036633364,0.00060582795,0.0015696379,0.03749094,0.012281567,0.0051150518,0.014068315,0.00060546485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003837657,0.00003505147,0.0006464958,0.00035323168,0.000014815281,0.0011587655,0.027933307,0.00015332559,0.0002354918,0.8929172,0.046025842,0.030488146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033994344,0.00008272637,0.0012489796,0.0017571978,0.00002945604,0.0010085932,0.041519098,0.00012542016,0.00044399375,0.19700757,0.75670195,0.000041066214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02001483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03308012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033513293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009856388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009608617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17723733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039814287","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00063.x","title":"THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD AND THE NEED FOR ITS INCORPORATION INTO A BILL OF RIGHTS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"International Human Rights and Reproductive Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Law; Bill of rights; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Human rights; Democracy; International human rights law; Perspective (graphical); Politics","score_opus":0.02398354852020967,"score_gpt":0.2953001855528089,"score_spread":0.27131663703259923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039814287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001701896,0.029327778,0.008945588,0.046718996,0.007695956,0.0003872871,0.00062738534,0.000087948174,0.9045071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11394656,0.07845644,0.06696174,0.14795646,0.008948242,0.0049638455,0.0021507405,0.00044373178,0.57617223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832933,0.005808455,0.001526417,0.0011026857,0.006786473,0.0014826589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953133,0.00211501,0.000592118,0.000584213,0.0011164345,0.0002790448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014246828,0.0011149256,0.0010978339,0.0019300587,0.0044147135,0.00744703,0.0020279614,0.011784927,0.009983655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018441724,0.0006420121,0.0010900497,0.0026158206,0.0076411,0.0043385387,0.004209821,0.012422574,0.0048583485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011000614,0.000015047145,0.000095745454,0.00011474245,0.000005522453,0.00012027027,0.00053477014,0.00010666153,0.00019865329,0.91466284,0.06561057,0.018524181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072328303,0.000026315676,0.00043384175,0.0006494557,0.000010693324,0.00014119789,0.00018233874,0.000053214466,0.000111528854,0.0688259,0.9295314,0.000026944514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025696797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029942673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025696797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003459754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016704407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07534528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040194546","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00117.x","title":"DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, DOVE, AND DIVORCE MEDIATION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dove; Categorical variable; Mediation; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Mental health; Domestic violence; Risk assessment; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Clinical psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Environmental health; Psychiatry; Computer science; Computer security; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.01638917466527218,"score_gpt":0.3241922748868361,"score_spread":0.30780310022156393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040194546","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006169952,0.9852272,0.00023333635,0.0015418166,0.00019461746,0.000009440908,0.000009384919,0.000002110567,0.006612086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058371738,0.93948424,0.00030095788,0.0003697368,0.00028922255,0.000015260905,0.000026978785,0.0000014815,0.0011403274],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810493,0.0010156501,0.00014730619,0.00009215303,0.0005425848,0.000097326134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735594,0.0016967608,0.00042237848,0.000036503803,0.00041599473,0.000072383555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015958666,0.00023205916,0.00057082775,0.0019228872,0.0005072547,0.0014730344,0.00046427324,0.00077065546,0.0015833881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054189498,0.00019105985,0.00027388273,0.0017098051,0.0010626373,0.00092640956,0.00075281283,0.00096870156,0.00019361853],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011236705,0.00016231115,0.026869444,0.010452034,0.00021107156,0.001834319,0.0019275213,0.00067350635,0.0003815746,0.032419678,0.012360507,0.9125957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050739043,0.0009251121,0.12114314,0.015329705,0.00038392897,0.015947456,0.007702383,0.0005577047,0.00084253954,0.018132534,0.818906,0.000078706704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007901791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016111314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007901791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011403358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030389833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015711606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046702320","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00910.x","title":"PEDOPHILIA","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Pedophilia; Recidivism; Psychology; Stigma (botany); Social psychology; Criminology; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychiatry; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.04743541708443172,"score_gpt":0.3513225511738332,"score_spread":0.3038871340894015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046702320","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031682417,0.740247,0.0025418254,0.007730071,0.0021654982,0.0001953675,0.0007898761,0.000119729324,0.21452819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2937176,0.59485024,0.0017249755,0.0067380737,0.0020666963,0.000116890165,0.00088410254,0.000045792447,0.09985562],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969554,0.00008299028,0.000031424515,0.000038722508,0.000075368975,0.000075951626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995697,0.00011175862,0.00011418686,0.000025205101,0.00009368056,0.00008551663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032407013,0.00033600777,0.00052831037,0.0008863604,0.0006923625,0.00095762865,0.0002866116,0.0008671316,0.024580792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017671307,0.00012426505,0.00025154438,0.0009260257,0.00034618314,0.0004880441,0.00044161902,0.0007598896,0.0056170523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038279194,0.0001664882,0.022199543,0.004550614,0.00017247302,0.088135734,0.00039566954,0.00011778061,0.0020149203,0.01207485,0.13473253,0.7350567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057518468,0.00016631256,0.01730876,0.002387173,0.00010035303,0.30397362,0.00058075396,0.000058826914,0.00084808405,0.0020116183,0.6724887,0.000018336854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010203322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013523084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024580792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030275105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065277546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072348734","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00661.x","title":"ASSESSING MUTUAL PARTNER‐ABUSE CLAIMS IN CHILD CUSTODY AND ACCESS CASES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Child custody; Power (physics); Domestic violence; Psychology; Child abuse; Criminology; Law; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Geography","score_opus":0.11242184705250083,"score_gpt":0.42720280270329497,"score_spread":0.3147809556507941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072348734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96422076,0.011175927,0.00073398225,0.0010074063,0.00006593762,0.00019920382,0.00009061746,0.000004633797,0.022501454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99448264,0.0032795789,0.0009893293,0.00015576651,0.00003896195,0.000086452164,0.000098238845,0.0000026005428,0.00086633203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96173185,0.020669188,0.0038338788,0.0011546587,0.010222732,0.0023875874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9172845,0.052531846,0.014797303,0.0014743815,0.012891466,0.0010205645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034938496,0.00027361783,0.0007543723,0.014987676,0.0055615352,0.0036415653,0.001752219,0.001751958,0.0013312255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.108980305,0.0004487701,0.00045872922,0.010593114,0.0034106309,0.0040188767,0.0056830635,0.0012264234,0.00017109663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045827232,0.00028261816,0.46231818,0.0032728813,0.0003918417,0.014262997,0.3208976,0.0014348605,0.0025055623,0.034367256,0.0038247604,0.15598321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003905359,0.0005707491,0.5877088,0.0021622325,0.00044059323,0.008921341,0.35072038,0.0016314285,0.0034640506,0.010130108,0.034097828,0.00011344392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048486356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1561047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048486356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053779907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005309276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18477464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075057681","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00660.x","title":"MOVIN' ON","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05976005348880054,"score_gpt":0.3591633051035167,"score_spread":0.29940325161471615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075057681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032751365,0.0025732766,0.0002704807,0.0030868987,0.00076952757,0.00006451575,0.0005516038,0.00009657097,0.9893119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022443138,0.0011144005,0.00024496278,0.004060466,0.0001162418,0.000039776387,0.00028626682,0.00004106259,0.9716537],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989624,0.00008394586,0.000027948416,0.0001328369,0.00041554018,0.00037728675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945635,0.00008035483,0.000028748176,0.00004177103,0.00030026765,0.00009260099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006347331,0.00030540163,0.00025821905,0.0013036254,0.0063858633,0.0031674737,0.001086969,0.0017776748,0.19105402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016605383,0.00018317785,0.00041287547,0.00092415354,0.0010422728,0.0008365207,0.0021057562,0.0014510958,0.02853774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069497626,0.000032265933,0.0019817762,0.00022844574,0.000012024815,0.0006326832,0.001706488,0.00012146856,0.0008459679,0.17338188,0.68327844,0.13770907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033516214,0.0000070702417,0.0016261154,0.000068597714,0.0000035689225,0.000047506423,0.00027195193,0.000023436623,0.00011076047,0.000677836,0.9971559,0.0000037883817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44586343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67555237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44586343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063565914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008326792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081683432","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00665.x","title":"ASSESSMENTS FOR POSTSEPARATION PARENTING DISPUTES IN CANADA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Mental health; Family law; Supreme court; Law; Psychology; Best interests; Child custody; Political science; Criminal law; Common law; Order (exchange); Psychiatry; Business","score_opus":0.06501038362968176,"score_gpt":0.42279650164150706,"score_spread":0.3577861180118253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081683432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66249436,0.038702678,0.0039037894,0.07683049,0.0010852354,0.0018777141,0.00296177,0.00022081687,0.2119232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95580465,0.012438448,0.005604748,0.0061096624,0.00012251233,0.00014229334,0.00069736585,0.000040728206,0.019039642],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370736,0.0010318252,0.00052527373,0.00033654209,0.0026181485,0.0017808876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682109,0.0064874026,0.0030220062,0.00051744113,0.016373591,0.005388657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008058907,0.0002520694,0.00043261188,0.00412086,0.009511041,0.0034133368,0.0027864182,0.0021844069,0.0050722007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041700486,0.0006147956,0.00038131612,0.004483759,0.0018772259,0.0009760528,0.002573448,0.0027432146,0.00030888297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034808624,0.00034540409,0.26192465,0.0016864896,0.00013290544,0.017060237,0.061604675,0.0027850047,0.0018830056,0.05775427,0.18362136,0.4108539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001490945,0.00022829391,0.6122312,0.0027419915,0.0001576194,0.0045756754,0.042369597,0.0033158523,0.0022355188,0.007156226,0.32453555,0.00030337667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98506343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07092767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07092767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21667594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5146187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086240373","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00911.x","title":"THE CORPORAL PUNISHMENT DEBATE IN CANADA","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporal punishment; Parliament; Supreme court; Punishment (psychology); Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Criminology; Psychology; Politics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03143154448091205,"score_gpt":0.28356313753981477,"score_spread":0.2521315930589027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086240373","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011506271,0.6437216,0.00028601795,0.20641668,0.0028013994,0.000041407406,0.00032388375,0.000025835427,0.13487686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34253204,0.5043116,0.0008892128,0.10638491,0.0025238108,0.00006754087,0.000303498,0.000054124648,0.042933334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928445,0.0011407539,0.0002620838,0.00050085224,0.003726253,0.0015256249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98843247,0.0034554305,0.00071091694,0.000210126,0.006086701,0.0011044656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005629507,0.0003709313,0.00082375726,0.0038986355,0.01197665,0.009497867,0.0025154445,0.0075343945,0.005445521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013857608,0.0004732623,0.0005137988,0.008332243,0.007517049,0.0018941505,0.0012161158,0.004729332,0.0004114404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008813878,0.00005628711,0.002809066,0.0017059391,0.00010207403,0.00086902466,0.0033612459,0.0016147518,0.000338542,0.43267578,0.45034158,0.106037706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058766163,0.000032294076,0.011980937,0.0027255851,0.00010498275,0.0002230845,0.002316732,0.00033210817,0.00027692184,0.01919923,0.96267164,0.00007779686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.978888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12508422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12508422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20493014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9075538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105190709","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12060","title":"Controversy about the Role of Children's Lawyers: Advocate or Best Interests Guardian? Comparing Practices in Two Canadian Jurisdictions with Different Policies for Lawyers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Citation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06301285000555393,"score_gpt":0.4044794314693569,"score_spread":0.34146658146380293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105190709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892083,0.0005725559,0.00008393899,0.004759168,0.000017614379,0.00003483459,0.0000421887,0.000005392974,0.0052759326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974076,0.00045582818,0.00018613119,0.0009078151,0.0000048035163,0.000015964804,0.000026150623,0.000005143586,0.0009906819],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878848,0.0028608066,0.0004988643,0.00093271205,0.0035328066,0.0042899475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771294,0.0067700096,0.0046270555,0.00053668924,0.0052003935,0.0057364563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008006906,0.00024455017,0.0005827109,0.0021951809,0.028313892,0.007161009,0.0029269336,0.0020240615,0.0023192698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030342989,0.00070734735,0.00033203053,0.0034958988,0.013402399,0.0021318914,0.0045684073,0.0032097292,0.00015711023],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063066764,0.00005729909,0.09161499,0.000087971835,0.000014932856,0.0005983129,0.8904229,0.000051672443,0.0007375073,0.0024858539,0.0015826258,0.012282907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007118438,0.00003213206,0.06734265,0.00010495833,0.000009974972,0.000113008675,0.92574817,0.000036689173,0.0001187483,0.00012609446,0.006335085,0.000025352412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9784418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.099365704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12678799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72095203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110783394","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00070.x","title":"THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA UPHOLDING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SECTION 43 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA: WHAT THIS DECISION MEANS TO THE CHILD WELFARE SECTOR*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Section (typography); Law; Criminal code; Code (set theory); Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Criminal law; Computer science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.03114747434942486,"score_gpt":0.2859998624272431,"score_spread":0.2548523880778183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110783394","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03848759,0.021156227,0.002432055,0.69266886,0.010814381,0.0003920409,0.0028477225,0.00021121306,0.23098984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30886397,0.0103200935,0.0045539774,0.5076431,0.0020411944,0.0002189243,0.0007225373,0.00024371257,0.1653925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812617,0.0013788112,0.0007325731,0.0014061151,0.009109044,0.006111717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97533256,0.0074904454,0.0007012057,0.0005149399,0.01284746,0.003113404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009944194,0.0005631834,0.0009905084,0.0019806789,0.019883519,0.011570523,0.004272742,0.02229078,0.0049196715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037723698,0.0011323716,0.00117764,0.0032900823,0.006777342,0.002735412,0.002541308,0.017998284,0.0007432625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081977734,0.0000286955,0.003164927,0.00020914075,0.00005971013,0.00065102614,0.0046046763,0.00035343884,0.00094765716,0.3257847,0.64722097,0.016892994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009819676,0.00004364458,0.013381799,0.00095271866,0.00025937828,0.00020761426,0.0039868136,0.0008131304,0.0015838626,0.02185083,0.9565439,0.0002781399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08431168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08431168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2982465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6117269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118147250","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00882.x","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF MODERN CANADIAN FAMILY LAW PROCEDURE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Family law; Law; Equity (law); Government (linguistics); Political science; Common law; Substantive law; Civil procedure; Civil law (Civil law); Public law","score_opus":0.033959379861419545,"score_gpt":0.3046778811358444,"score_spread":0.2707185012744248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118147250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05198247,0.06331046,0.012805884,0.068413556,0.0029619227,0.00033980882,0.0015210292,0.0004367407,0.79822814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65809995,0.05642251,0.021815285,0.017087491,0.0009618472,0.00022086098,0.00081858,0.00030177154,0.24427176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99078244,0.0012508433,0.0003156983,0.0011458828,0.0054092347,0.0010959574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846919,0.0016398622,0.00044832748,0.0005671191,0.011743745,0.00090915244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064422577,0.00041007553,0.0003550011,0.0062487074,0.011235361,0.0059553324,0.002034057,0.0018516214,0.008370077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014239864,0.0005340804,0.00046081078,0.0061203004,0.00966298,0.00209096,0.0016581647,0.0026901723,0.00077732006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030282921,0.000029564442,0.0034486137,0.00032343954,0.000016784887,0.00028316153,0.007988801,0.0008822466,0.0005545488,0.75885254,0.071745865,0.15584417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007679758,0.000019360417,0.014786637,0.00024671757,0.000015742386,0.00018958516,0.0010501462,0.0004308636,0.00030123568,0.012313902,0.970578,0.00006017484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.981847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98442614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16371655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16371655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1703957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9699703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126014122","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12172","title":"Association for Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Eldercaring Coordinators","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Grievance; Conflict resolution; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.16248180424463685,"score_gpt":0.4167717372777731,"score_spread":0.2542899330331363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126014122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022035425,0.030544471,0.08592213,0.2350404,0.02550664,0.024780758,0.0038754118,0.002987901,0.58913875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036347903,0.046901956,0.2859129,0.2173755,0.008782605,0.075270765,0.012408198,0.0024997038,0.31450057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.87536335,0.06572168,0.024986466,0.002869911,0.02345613,0.0076024593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8162302,0.053237114,0.0126488805,0.007989129,0.09704123,0.0128534455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.103969365,0.0015290123,0.001300965,0.0050421073,0.0066060736,0.008535872,0.0059878463,0.01225441,0.047785074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2087467,0.0019743089,0.0025084347,0.004279224,0.0035070963,0.006925508,0.00840947,0.01495852,0.046367586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003540143,0.00017382656,0.00060150045,0.0005257968,0.000008132358,0.0002377394,0.0016517217,0.00020102697,0.00015958937,0.021805406,0.90405834,0.0705415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002587996,0.000023420273,0.00035178268,0.0017311767,0.000004803051,0.00023072121,0.00058656844,0.00010897023,0.00008861566,0.003977947,0.99284136,0.000028817758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018022187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032740712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103969365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008907619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06598517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54984915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127238270","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00180.x","title":"CHOOSE TO HUG, NOT HIT*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of the Child; Convention; Psychology; Political science; Law; Criminology; Human rights","score_opus":0.05173435427324811,"score_gpt":0.36794030055490257,"score_spread":0.31620594628165444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127238270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030611595,0.018347528,0.0028972938,0.06216764,0.007813993,0.000137024,0.00031203072,0.00017019021,0.87754273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27142376,0.013433407,0.0015726091,0.05001665,0.0012185663,0.00017097857,0.00019888449,0.00010107313,0.6618641],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918693,0.00029446676,0.000025805983,0.000058617614,0.00021861155,0.00021556474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999138,0.00024807366,0.00009618452,0.00006292091,0.0001370769,0.0003176574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088137557,0.00018538901,0.0002409666,0.00024203614,0.0017815611,0.0015916994,0.00043273953,0.0013468991,0.06103732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004103932,0.00011725987,0.00017750074,0.00020155784,0.0010015278,0.0012549997,0.0012558384,0.0016896977,0.020365043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011197819,0.000145008,0.005660553,0.00029696932,0.000024581415,0.0013204276,0.00315718,0.00009980807,0.00069438166,0.08671954,0.57904035,0.32272923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014591718,0.00010048526,0.0030758006,0.00018158225,0.000009513893,0.0012490414,0.0036939573,0.000044980778,0.0002518725,0.0051426743,0.98622197,0.000013626672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032070454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011560084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06103732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034764098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011676124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2041902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131284740","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01296.x","title":"PARENTAL ALIENATION: CANADIAN COURT CASES 1989–2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Citation; Family court; Sociology; Law; History; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04782442497088262,"score_gpt":0.3398939775480977,"score_spread":0.29206955257721506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131284740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4295287,0.1438991,0.0005919214,0.07836659,0.0030402755,0.0009047207,0.028243838,0.00010222267,0.3153226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.811624,0.049695235,0.0010455747,0.030233731,0.00088419655,0.00035004597,0.008547888,0.000055626435,0.09756375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99057835,0.0004892691,0.0004770982,0.0006269621,0.005151717,0.0026765235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815083,0.0035302062,0.002584269,0.00049622176,0.010115468,0.0017655449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075195828,0.0004991664,0.0005864014,0.0071977526,0.015643414,0.0031926727,0.003226668,0.004006788,0.0041616885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023724,0.00060302933,0.0006215376,0.014972262,0.0024965366,0.0008346595,0.0021139989,0.0027849532,0.00041264607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005656177,0.00013478687,0.07351684,0.0022113838,0.0003049004,0.0069383206,0.027682545,0.00092191837,0.0009638339,0.045715835,0.7165828,0.124461226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111560876,0.000045168046,0.39840922,0.0013498674,0.00030529065,0.0010128361,0.010886735,0.00024672714,0.0005834244,0.0009636277,0.585948,0.00013763428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11330699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11330699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17078364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8221036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139087767","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01412.x","title":"THE “EYE OF THE BEHOLDER”: PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS ABOUT THE BEST INTERESTS OF A CHILD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Child custody; State (computer science); Function (biology); Best interests; Psychology; Political science; Law; Empirical research; Social psychology; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.1021398112332396,"score_gpt":0.37622963121187525,"score_spread":0.27408981997863563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139087767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50196517,0.08805892,0.0025821163,0.14645217,0.0005128361,0.00009681694,0.000105741536,0.000018553996,0.26020768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753975,0.014374776,0.00086403545,0.00491614,0.00013297256,0.000017005756,0.000022691116,0.000006522651,0.004268221],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9733831,0.017585149,0.0008546472,0.00081232097,0.0061406363,0.0012241766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967187,0.022389166,0.0035692833,0.00046191586,0.005527692,0.0008649383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021344295,0.00015661381,0.000336625,0.0018170099,0.005955742,0.0058960915,0.0011722607,0.0025540167,0.0016035226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060097747,0.00023533992,0.00019088468,0.0013958028,0.011654,0.002692897,0.0020778507,0.001786091,0.00018773296],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014209072,0.0000622325,0.051540572,0.0012941562,0.000093593895,0.004148644,0.5092881,0.0004129708,0.0018074719,0.1658623,0.04520264,0.22014533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037257058,0.000096227566,0.10914487,0.0038109354,0.00013611882,0.0017920855,0.5026815,0.00041561786,0.0013438751,0.037716318,0.3426997,0.0001254849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3489808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6081111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3489808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01903126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02445789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69389904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142554591","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2002.tb00848.x","title":"DETERMINING THE EFFECTIVE REPRESENTATION OF A CHILD IN OUR LEGAL SYSTEM","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Association (psychology); Process (computing); Professional responsibility; Psychology; Law; Professional conduct; Child custody; Association rule learning; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.03252536613617515,"score_gpt":0.33035479595454686,"score_spread":0.29782942981837174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142554591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66045845,0.0011629877,0.03791065,0.02655689,0.0001248147,0.0006442682,0.000111773,0.00008067986,0.27294952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98302114,0.00027402214,0.010875194,0.0006445269,0.000018848368,0.0000935791,0.000013130328,0.000014874043,0.005044682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9637636,0.025007218,0.0013923392,0.0014146823,0.00518868,0.0032334938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696423,0.017033443,0.004274341,0.0018907817,0.0060402933,0.0011189126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034581155,0.00014846555,0.00026282528,0.0018143315,0.0106911855,0.011015025,0.0014449017,0.0023625416,0.00404536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088067725,0.0004362801,0.00021254175,0.0011214275,0.010137343,0.005476926,0.005710554,0.0025616237,0.00060906925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039682403,0.00005902722,0.03096234,0.00010977267,0.000017970637,0.0012807407,0.08974352,0.0013259528,0.0022144902,0.8009694,0.0062140445,0.06706315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008627092,0.000369743,0.06582706,0.0014363666,0.00015998646,0.002972333,0.30070308,0.01271731,0.015703687,0.23109712,0.3687393,0.00018775497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04291555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06501102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04291555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01068196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021144863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18288481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152358658","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00659.x","title":"CANADIAN ISSUE, EH?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Citation; Law; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.041699897021226,"score_gpt":0.37368938095527743,"score_spread":0.3319894839340514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152358658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004362851,0.019878492,0.00032982833,0.40137017,0.022120507,0.00016431845,0.0036467412,0.0001305343,0.5479966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03267265,0.008025925,0.000645735,0.14704372,0.004423846,0.00006551471,0.0007173226,0.00011309028,0.80629224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715257,0.00014842686,0.000113158014,0.00031763385,0.0015521667,0.00071602623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957788,0.00042564925,0.00009285183,0.0001412881,0.0027750009,0.00078640465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023128793,0.0004329019,0.00052894227,0.001588958,0.014616343,0.007848025,0.0015202384,0.009726202,0.07506836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010010404,0.0003924907,0.0006572339,0.002240804,0.002404352,0.002080137,0.0018214266,0.006399187,0.0066444483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018350767,0.000007845199,0.0005633521,0.00006906229,0.0000075605803,0.00032837654,0.0002925959,0.000022775042,0.00011009149,0.036187038,0.95033693,0.01205595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008596649,0.0000033519198,0.0022476832,0.00009961001,0.000009426816,0.00008413071,0.0004293122,0.000021492473,0.0000795747,0.0017442873,0.9952571,0.000015458452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92896914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97866607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07506836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03805811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08623089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27613223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165826771","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00216.x","title":"CUSTODY DISPUTES INVOLVING ALLEGATIONS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: TOWARD A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO PARENTING PLANS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Differential (mechanical device); Child abuse; Social psychology; Poison control; Criminology; Developmental psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Medical emergency; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.07078689713719062,"score_gpt":0.34329649021113967,"score_spread":0.27250959307394906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165826771","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014613389,0.9304845,0.00824479,0.016695686,0.0009165408,0.00013839274,0.000044222434,0.000022337328,0.028840102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1796909,0.80176,0.011882586,0.0034998746,0.00067792094,0.0001512431,0.00009841258,0.000009810723,0.0022292591],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98738873,0.00847687,0.0014172089,0.00038996522,0.002000881,0.0003263484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97509956,0.016895818,0.0027408814,0.00060246274,0.004095895,0.0005654856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01762596,0.00032302356,0.0008511734,0.004930884,0.0012699099,0.0030931586,0.002060539,0.0019123298,0.00093439885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033644322,0.00044955194,0.0006708407,0.0023517713,0.0045198095,0.0039943056,0.0021517775,0.0035621705,0.00022141491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011435284,0.0001229637,0.018175049,0.00967064,0.00019814934,0.0030031349,0.012329155,0.0021286854,0.00048410622,0.1845487,0.018108206,0.7511168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011848584,0.0007249725,0.053268556,0.051360782,0.00044093293,0.015451566,0.029818518,0.0011841101,0.0009902582,0.09829902,0.7481053,0.00023748174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010840668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029639218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01762596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030148032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0093775755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09321606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468368803","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12231","title":"1‐800‐Skype‐Me","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Mode (computer interface); Psychology; Computer science; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.04594586685681762,"score_gpt":0.33330446399460206,"score_spread":0.28735859713778444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468368803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00069104857,0.00082712265,0.00014446938,0.001413059,0.00042931148,0.000044637556,0.0005011925,0.0002327879,0.9957163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040781586,0.00060617283,0.00010369633,0.00081571256,0.000080038204,0.000025038478,0.00025154595,0.00007548048,0.99396425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996687,0.000061334285,0.000014653292,0.00007144029,0.00010868678,0.00007522915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924314,0.00017878426,0.000034111003,0.00007831981,0.00025334486,0.00021232192],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038760874,0.0004073556,0.00021165679,0.0009261496,0.0017719478,0.0014600314,0.00082926673,0.0022150658,0.89340293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001434751,0.0002742734,0.00028016718,0.0007110691,0.00039836744,0.0014054326,0.0019168813,0.0010319356,0.7122204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064428554,0.000054888264,0.00053841755,0.00020971228,0.000004026197,0.00022925907,0.00008823901,0.000050973988,0.00059503905,0.0062933015,0.80501926,0.18685251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053880826,0.000010337715,0.00078008394,0.00005933946,8.785516e-7,0.0000699624,0.000051185827,0.000016450997,0.00006250502,0.00014686365,0.9987953,0.0000016528566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006581546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019837001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89340293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093258487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009268797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1520477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522893009","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12236","title":"Understanding Pathways to Family Dispute Resolution and Justice Reforms: Ontario Court File Analysis &amp; Survey of Professionals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family court; Negotiation; Economic Justice; Mediation; Attendance; Dispute resolution; Family mediation; Family law; Psychology; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.23509296250817574,"score_gpt":0.3600738974728618,"score_spread":0.12498093496468604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522893009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946812,0.00033395577,0.00006013251,0.0012188226,0.0000028580869,0.00004389142,0.00072844734,0.0000019773236,0.0029287862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722445,0.0006103766,0.00011189534,0.00017634894,0.000004159343,0.000037331483,0.0005095177,0.0000026344135,0.001323381],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968123,0.00056803843,0.00026639033,0.00028523474,0.0012730182,0.00079498446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907405,0.002077851,0.004089486,0.00035518192,0.0028468135,0.0015565874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030427624,0.0001150665,0.00024333282,0.002706601,0.0044109235,0.0022575734,0.00087864377,0.00065180473,0.0026047286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016173193,0.0003506279,0.00022955835,0.0049864673,0.0013784992,0.001524284,0.0022248894,0.0006048048,0.0002114065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027538763,0.0000303457,0.91958874,0.000056118457,0.000011233372,0.0002118224,0.06742441,0.000044645803,0.00013448964,0.0005362365,0.0015007247,0.010433654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030980711,0.000016430502,0.93389875,0.000046254612,0.0000034353243,0.00007348816,0.061848905,0.00006403947,0.000026938967,0.000062831095,0.003947977,0.000007849375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9479987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9732832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052001297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025113331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03084912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1822108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576862296","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12267","title":"A Survey of Beliefs and Priorities About Access to Justice of Family Law: The Search for A Multidisciplinary Perspective*","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Mental health; Family law; Law; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Political science; Popularity; Psychology; Public relations; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.28785571453105835,"score_gpt":0.5381772428008942,"score_spread":0.25032152826983584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576862296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972083,0.0007448464,0.00011719923,0.000691072,0.000011159124,0.000043669035,0.00012191929,0.0000014200378,0.0010604393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973744,0.0012599679,0.00032383937,0.00044405847,0.000011373953,0.00010164774,0.00015745658,0.0000015259496,0.00032560452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974253,0.0016015618,0.00028497577,0.00011467763,0.00034626774,0.00022722766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98991746,0.004558792,0.0028926944,0.00020068177,0.0015258308,0.0009044832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008001446,0.0001337373,0.00031749395,0.0016529623,0.0008423441,0.0012600176,0.00035246767,0.0006028354,0.0012296189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015703443,0.00026001383,0.00022189549,0.0020720954,0.000736237,0.002008812,0.0014038193,0.00094918953,0.00017674244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046639438,0.00015898148,0.88940185,0.00028494693,0.00003103013,0.0002647402,0.0798262,0.000033085245,0.00023848817,0.00067919516,0.0022189573,0.026815832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010720821,0.00031990086,0.72047657,0.00044165415,0.000017510949,0.00041844192,0.26851815,0.00020939154,0.000076051554,0.00025919682,0.009235216,0.000017228225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007617543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009467791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008001446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009253051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001825233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0423162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750155760","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12289","title":"Crossover Cases of High‐Conflict Families Involving Child Protection Services: Ontario Research Findings and Suggestions for Good Practices","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Harm; Economic Justice; Family court; Child protection; Crossover; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Medicine; Nursing; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.17887186734947072,"score_gpt":0.4240792760886152,"score_spread":0.24520740873914446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750155760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79089516,0.087884344,0.002164772,0.037612047,0.00044112036,0.0011370727,0.0010790596,0.00006815113,0.07871825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534149,0.035184827,0.0040797326,0.002148345,0.00008939469,0.0003807677,0.00048101792,0.000024551793,0.0041962555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98273015,0.007766276,0.0016025561,0.0013730684,0.004551603,0.001976341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9297632,0.03157413,0.014243164,0.0037918235,0.016858617,0.0037690233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024521114,0.00032236672,0.0007059089,0.0051856185,0.010288243,0.0044198995,0.0028103483,0.0010203958,0.0051470236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05894797,0.00064716017,0.00049791567,0.0097616855,0.006570353,0.004161898,0.0038529048,0.0012257915,0.00026453505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004374075,0.00041152124,0.35695383,0.005115878,0.00015025985,0.0074474704,0.3394204,0.00044594103,0.0014202986,0.027080646,0.026032673,0.23508374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010081998,0.00013691341,0.49435243,0.0073760883,0.0001522779,0.0024712821,0.41073492,0.0003236083,0.000521226,0.0039832736,0.07973301,0.00011418138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9029114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9720077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097088575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049140837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091803126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35654342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765402529","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12301","title":"Shared Parenting in Canada: Increasing Use But Continued Controversy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Statute; Statutory law; Presumption; Child custody; Political science; Child support; Psychology; Law; Family law; Criminology","score_opus":0.07694001248423663,"score_gpt":0.3333489573152807,"score_spread":0.25640894483104404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765402529","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007973439,0.8488504,0.00029142466,0.11797674,0.0018159883,0.000034221146,0.0007267744,0.00002863385,0.022302387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16459759,0.7721039,0.0015336515,0.055480886,0.0017568326,0.00006084617,0.00068673806,0.00008942,0.003690076],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96468216,0.0042847493,0.0023257209,0.0034276522,0.021751767,0.0035279114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8450943,0.044741653,0.008432441,0.003082136,0.09028865,0.008360869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035968706,0.0005729497,0.0021944072,0.012403465,0.010029305,0.0128346495,0.0076661,0.0044426373,0.0049993447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06484228,0.00080732396,0.0011074229,0.026864804,0.013173159,0.0047974633,0.003991988,0.006623696,0.00033247587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001585957,0.0001059578,0.01876573,0.011499617,0.00037877803,0.000537658,0.009279312,0.00063643954,0.00031896823,0.12520027,0.20983262,0.62328607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005729234,0.00008456849,0.05937206,0.028233021,0.0004342933,0.00053249643,0.015562784,0.000431837,0.00035516146,0.0080677355,0.8866516,0.0002171746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99203944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17659824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17659824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37593186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9550293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962752731","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12422","title":"Innovative Family Mediation Research Initiative Embedded in the Community In Ireland","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Statutory law; Test (biology); Empirical research; Public relations; Directive; Resource (disambiguation); Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1480351670368052,"score_gpt":0.3542271658687037,"score_spread":0.20619199883189848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962752731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.326225,0.026343476,0.019548062,0.14834477,0.003477536,0.00749907,0.003717387,0.00042324592,0.46442142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8966023,0.007158726,0.016290868,0.0071764807,0.00031337223,0.003996914,0.0010691028,0.00014897443,0.06724327],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720988,0.019598337,0.0004792491,0.0010109181,0.002931725,0.003880924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967811,0.012355838,0.0020681815,0.0028077809,0.0070498763,0.007907378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03545729,0.00026271128,0.00059124583,0.0011165593,0.0036949168,0.0052641444,0.0019066735,0.0016233324,0.00860979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032927696,0.00035002342,0.0005968653,0.0019511488,0.0040913248,0.0032415465,0.0089580575,0.0024669091,0.0011336387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012318885,0.0015112195,0.023842758,0.0029536213,0.00030996313,0.002110732,0.037010226,0.0024875794,0.0010919123,0.26764983,0.24071786,0.4190825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005878515,0.001035789,0.03996102,0.0020493744,0.00008781171,0.0005325037,0.09120066,0.0011015976,0.000987329,0.033301953,0.82902384,0.0001303347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07833132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11034472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07833132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01973508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07868824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18751836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003924243","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12456","title":"Parenting Coordination and Confidentiality: A (Not‐so) Delicate Balance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child and Adolescent Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; CLARITY; Discretion; Psychology; Balance (ability); Political science; Law; Social psychology; Public relations; Business; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10634250027165601,"score_gpt":0.41459177967210925,"score_spread":0.3082492794004532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003924243","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047358178,0.019632597,0.012531159,0.7850593,0.0013056187,0.00009308841,0.00006075,0.000056492052,0.13390289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92297035,0.008581538,0.0068783476,0.05305644,0.00073936227,0.00006052282,0.000025264239,0.000029451097,0.0076587363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94933736,0.019257925,0.0019283094,0.0036876805,0.017618256,0.008170455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95538664,0.023120938,0.0038355575,0.002956215,0.00945936,0.0052413805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035368796,0.00027536863,0.00075185456,0.0014929724,0.017959548,0.022398414,0.0032228397,0.0070028105,0.0026015504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048153553,0.0005267208,0.00051437184,0.0015156426,0.04703342,0.012992993,0.0071700118,0.010529672,0.00021480436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018196713,0.000021872342,0.0033424734,0.0001741355,0.000020258245,0.00021691919,0.017865252,0.00034788967,0.00022042637,0.9338562,0.011757504,0.03215895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005655633,0.00012040097,0.018059604,0.0037715174,0.000094603536,0.0009725878,0.12054531,0.0016062728,0.001049178,0.4742389,0.37925398,0.00023109898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5382118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.667195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5382118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052212894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12632903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92901546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021709107","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12487","title":"An Interdisciplinary Case Management Protocol for Child Resistance or Refusal Dynamics<sup>†</sup>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Psychology; Focus group; Conflict resolution; Introspection; Protocol (science); Accountability; Conflict management; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06547832487396374,"score_gpt":0.409277610102394,"score_spread":0.3437992852284303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021709107","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0120805735,0.000099536584,0.04659935,0.001532161,0.0005711168,0.91205186,0.001882679,0.0007432021,0.024439562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01665875,0.00020048364,0.117354676,0.0007756448,0.00013579459,0.85269374,0.0014143004,0.00014240367,0.010624273],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97244704,0.018714815,0.003873989,0.0010833289,0.0026960105,0.0011847641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94701236,0.017935649,0.0030679523,0.010763992,0.017915066,0.0033050394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051819116,0.0013973262,0.0009800222,0.0031025463,0.0041556736,0.0018766517,0.0034998877,0.0015935069,0.092425354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05077196,0.0015074413,0.0009276391,0.0017393726,0.0014140508,0.0018840528,0.0036450948,0.0030766171,0.02576822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005310125,0.011876398,0.0053649447,0.0034092914,0.00004683843,0.0035772538,0.036174636,0.0025053383,0.020880139,0.015959084,0.3994346,0.49546137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007091288,0.007833076,0.024830138,0.0034076117,0.00005206689,0.0021342752,0.018583544,0.008747282,0.016081406,0.008423169,0.90237385,0.00044219245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018064386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074372627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092425354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032301836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022749746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3091936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045589255","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12508","title":"Emerging Parenting Coordination Practices Around the Globe: What We Have Learned","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Confidentiality; Referral; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Law; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.13257453789532433,"score_gpt":0.38678678235331915,"score_spread":0.25421224445799484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045589255","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27220288,0.48078683,0.0011534272,0.20255975,0.0022202316,0.00005951493,0.0002587796,0.00003482902,0.040723808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61158603,0.36760885,0.0015217946,0.014826346,0.0006423357,0.00006937066,0.00021727046,0.000034917706,0.0034931195],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939818,0.0034646415,0.0003842367,0.0006979925,0.00071860896,0.00075264054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700514,0.018048605,0.0033228437,0.0013222705,0.0045386325,0.0027162374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010787147,0.0002961812,0.00071998156,0.0016403134,0.006014481,0.011060362,0.0014253054,0.0026579632,0.0036015233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018574854,0.000320312,0.0003258767,0.005485652,0.008853571,0.011574525,0.0049478775,0.0050775697,0.00024984326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056653993,0.000111863614,0.035930473,0.003131873,0.000054441753,0.0023668872,0.60307646,0.0001410214,0.00023668927,0.028161943,0.017476832,0.30925485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006799589,0.000059599202,0.036706988,0.0076583223,0.000026765701,0.0012058364,0.7952305,0.000042503223,0.00010864277,0.0039209826,0.15498741,0.000045674293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08762983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16597238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08762983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005561382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018843565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17423952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045659605","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12507","title":"Parenting Coordination Law in the U.S. and Canada: A Review of the Sources and Scope of the <scp>PC</scp>'s Authority","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family and Disability Support Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Jurisdiction; Scope (computer science); Competence (human resources); Professionalization; Intervention (counseling); Law; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07006436415084899,"score_gpt":0.3662774264330587,"score_spread":0.2962130622822097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045659605","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019899373,0.99486876,0.000026872609,0.0015935127,0.00015354813,0.000022775319,0.00012142684,0.000004293876,0.0030098194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032127835,0.99524564,0.00015112913,0.000853933,0.000047252313,0.000018610459,0.0000865562,0.0000025121867,0.00038150148],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948318,0.00067580584,0.0006407236,0.00034133135,0.0030496968,0.00046051724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97797376,0.006810198,0.0019211675,0.00029175493,0.012147915,0.00085524336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00818333,0.0008267951,0.0016548604,0.018169722,0.003285871,0.00516753,0.0021146727,0.0017276511,0.0029901355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018757472,0.00073325343,0.0009882819,0.030882161,0.0037232065,0.0016974952,0.0014579472,0.0026087142,0.0003695731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007772593,0.000057505484,0.002570115,0.08383885,0.00026931477,0.0003258257,0.0015977836,0.00044086904,0.0002878657,0.026039124,0.13708036,0.7474147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023948678,0.000040807754,0.014973472,0.1397599,0.00052906974,0.00026087798,0.001226112,0.00009992596,0.00017548141,0.0012805565,0.8415807,0.000049238053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9234638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96326417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07653618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06023737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25618023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43705475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045858742","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12505","title":"New <scp>AFCC</scp> Guidelines for Parenting Coordination (2019)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Marriage and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Task (project management); Task force; Statute; Psychology; Multiculturalism; Work (physics); Political science; Engineering; Law; Public administration; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.12659980702886497,"score_gpt":0.38425707759048255,"score_spread":0.2576572705616176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045858742","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024610865,0.110571794,0.012734479,0.5637848,0.06719358,0.004139447,0.015807265,0.0016717201,0.22163574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03216396,0.15635759,0.11254521,0.39490443,0.020841679,0.014949532,0.042654596,0.0017007804,0.22388226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97283566,0.0060136016,0.005652053,0.0007579392,0.01202464,0.0027161061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9032175,0.020813221,0.0067388196,0.0021902055,0.060043592,0.006996637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031159353,0.001220031,0.0011531382,0.0062000635,0.0032005005,0.0052477554,0.0046762507,0.010484693,0.012385353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07409587,0.0010513795,0.002490824,0.0044291327,0.002670508,0.0030154525,0.0041192416,0.010532604,0.0066762827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012326086,0.000028434873,0.00037866714,0.000492874,0.0000063393254,0.00008745094,0.0003052827,0.000079661295,0.00008486737,0.004261088,0.9566873,0.037575785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014620217,0.000018349827,0.0024691487,0.0034899088,0.000016484044,0.00015274479,0.00027158434,0.000036015725,0.00008455552,0.0013222441,0.992098,0.00002633005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20508493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25322315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20508493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013107596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07637286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40778238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045968056","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12509","title":"Effective Use of Parenting Coordination: Considerations for Legal and Mental Health Professionals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Intervention (counseling); Referral; Family law; Mental health; Conciliation; Dispute resolution; Psychology; Family court; Conflict resolution; Nursing; Political science; Law; Medicine; Mediation; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.09951592691784956,"score_gpt":0.3833228083569018,"score_spread":0.28380688143905225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045968056","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013172383,0.5714031,0.00089247717,0.413954,0.0032205547,0.000048237605,0.000018714787,0.000020495274,0.009125214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07054909,0.8397407,0.0067764856,0.072380394,0.006226167,0.00032036955,0.000056307443,0.00003215757,0.0039183325],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679251,0.021254249,0.0029061406,0.000874278,0.0051711896,0.0018689982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9076064,0.062087808,0.0045508314,0.0016443295,0.018173264,0.0059373057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048012003,0.00045466752,0.0010559467,0.004231246,0.006072133,0.008776034,0.0027816498,0.008716776,0.0034568238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09535391,0.00051549537,0.00086977053,0.0026348687,0.0051732818,0.008329825,0.005010291,0.009448118,0.00071953674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043460917,0.000097908756,0.0030334943,0.00701844,0.00006846328,0.0012410874,0.014386974,0.00030276837,0.0003040212,0.07674624,0.25067282,0.6460843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038335493,0.00012734593,0.0065396684,0.04265408,0.000098326214,0.0022996545,0.031117104,0.00015615342,0.00017450302,0.025679527,0.8910313,0.00008403297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03730605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.115324244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048012003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010348072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06007741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25391477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086644390","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12498","title":"Does A Parent's Right to Parenting Matter in Termination of Parental Rights? An Analysis of Court Cases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Neglect; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Constitutional right; Developmental psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03671530957619508,"score_gpt":0.3400446426806057,"score_spread":0.3033293331044106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086644390","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06595627,0.8082362,0.0011192246,0.028391426,0.0009993417,0.00010547459,0.00008847342,0.000009034069,0.095094584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5105554,0.46950307,0.000705282,0.012650449,0.0010800249,0.000096919546,0.000112669935,0.00002083135,0.005275335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842037,0.008742283,0.0011652064,0.00070825726,0.0034785545,0.0017019879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9554677,0.037405018,0.0030498733,0.0005509445,0.0028906092,0.00063586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0143854795,0.00023910323,0.00089917396,0.0054479544,0.0028933643,0.0045822696,0.0010664774,0.0045658234,0.0026058734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041354876,0.00041232537,0.0009592752,0.0043688673,0.0051150857,0.0035765788,0.0014532703,0.0033990394,0.00040779522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030368933,0.00026070626,0.028969944,0.0057388265,0.00050978694,0.0064723296,0.020884931,0.0015949694,0.00093146,0.5651348,0.05168795,0.3175106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020103382,0.00071694044,0.1347474,0.04230693,0.0011820979,0.008462355,0.039591994,0.0010197784,0.0011357148,0.094383106,0.6760197,0.00023292101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028497623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05072457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028497623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053474065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007599843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076078594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122448045","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12069","title":"Family Law Proceedings and the Child's Right to be Heard in <scp>A</scp>ustralia, the <scp>U</scp>nited <scp>K</scp>ingdom, <scp>N</scp>ew <scp>Z</scp>ealand, and <scp>C</scp>anada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Active listening; Jurisdiction; Law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Kingdom; Political science; Family court; Common law; Child protection; Strengths and weaknesses; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.027394403517179935,"score_gpt":0.28452474876286604,"score_spread":0.2571303452456861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122448045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37890315,0.23315011,0.0004500495,0.0657179,0.00045565626,0.0001049943,0.00018735351,0.000015432994,0.32101533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592199,0.029541083,0.00016750496,0.0025770764,0.00007203048,0.000028781558,0.00003690768,0.000007801231,0.008348867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898302,0.005145257,0.000565641,0.0005518818,0.0021670833,0.001739803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98194516,0.011727091,0.0028020656,0.00031474422,0.0023732767,0.0008375956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008944267,0.0001491846,0.00029552457,0.0025437255,0.0072846827,0.006588271,0.0008455797,0.0022027986,0.0026145333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021065,0.00021624654,0.0002435213,0.0037443354,0.01071985,0.0028767036,0.0024330541,0.0023808945,0.00011018136],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053299784,0.00008561624,0.025093952,0.001864618,0.0000997733,0.0020111243,0.2923268,0.000518614,0.00076199777,0.5214272,0.028767511,0.12698945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029481265,0.00013217212,0.11647494,0.008329956,0.00017081325,0.00086032954,0.19465198,0.00014966198,0.0008700699,0.015871475,0.6623545,0.00010466121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48763725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.634609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5123627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03921895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96959776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139194885","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12559","title":"The Hague Convention and Transnational Custody Disputes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Jurisdiction; Residence; Law; Conflict of laws; Supreme court; Political science; Child custody; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Personal jurisdiction; Psychology; Sociology; Human rights; Demography","score_opus":0.024254080818758357,"score_gpt":0.326433527995847,"score_spread":0.30217944717708867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139194885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015116069,0.0076639075,0.0045525217,0.011946778,0.0004828389,0.0000589448,0.00012433165,0.000037513215,0.9600171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8212067,0.0072253845,0.0037657395,0.019678634,0.0006341267,0.00043259424,0.0002200202,0.00015238566,0.14668451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779474,0.006426815,0.0010531807,0.0031794414,0.006332694,0.005060517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938778,0.002892633,0.0005010848,0.0008463963,0.0013828495,0.0004991755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013984777,0.0006807736,0.0010414554,0.0037786195,0.02388754,0.022274261,0.004087309,0.01570505,0.011644859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0213048,0.0009828527,0.0010396978,0.00622916,0.03847868,0.013533319,0.013473846,0.013606089,0.00111153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018270223,0.0000022984457,0.000059297483,0.000004324572,0.0000014445359,0.000049440212,0.00069384486,0.00006444199,0.000009410541,0.99608517,0.0021244837,0.00090409373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027541175,0.000015425525,0.0009185563,0.00045867736,0.000018668981,0.00025324506,0.0057468773,0.000713011,0.0001454923,0.6961778,0.29543355,0.00009117596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39205045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3579076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39205045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036213905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031976312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7795369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159762856","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12574","title":"Taking a Shot: Access to Justice, Judging and eCourt","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Settlement (finance); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Law; Nova scotia; Political science; Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Process (computing); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08464916832842004,"score_gpt":0.3367907881952229,"score_spread":0.25214161986680284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159762856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04849179,0.0085523,0.010422298,0.11261593,0.0009548659,0.00021316079,0.00009550803,0.0002435436,0.8184107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7802775,0.0031927163,0.0053036674,0.018957613,0.0007877374,0.00014276362,0.000072428404,0.00013931215,0.19112633],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98107797,0.009090683,0.00065899966,0.0011521581,0.004956725,0.0030634543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97581077,0.012212554,0.0012759947,0.0016592109,0.004508367,0.004533178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014016636,0.00020899886,0.0003951732,0.0019438177,0.009357459,0.0149180535,0.0016178972,0.004687325,0.037314806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042958923,0.00037279207,0.00023796721,0.0009616562,0.008279613,0.00828539,0.008095461,0.0038467553,0.0031917242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012513075,0.00029752855,0.016224943,0.00022516366,0.000024824249,0.0038855013,0.038964853,0.00026305643,0.001190246,0.34888256,0.18630342,0.40361273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003169404,0.00013345775,0.018280568,0.0005181771,0.00001918652,0.0011323238,0.020505661,0.0006027843,0.00065007363,0.07640896,0.8816463,0.000070955306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052626643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10926896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052626643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071779015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014629233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124830425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183973827","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12542","title":"The <i><scp>AFCC‐Ontario</scp> Parenting Plan Guide</i> and <i>Template</i>: Jurisdictionally‐Specific Resources for Family Justice Professionals and Parents","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Plan (archaeology); Conciliation; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Law; Nursing; Medicine; Mediation","score_opus":0.057967735171407325,"score_gpt":0.33761456779584664,"score_spread":0.27964683262443935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183973827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041501685,0.0014836034,0.008543054,0.014383549,0.0016418601,0.0016984738,0.020364929,0.0033188162,0.94441557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018914659,0.0044116774,0.03879714,0.010513405,0.0003666109,0.0021657408,0.01789951,0.0018837692,0.9050475],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883586,0.00014466625,0.00006727978,0.00006744823,0.0006410506,0.00024371293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675673,0.00074869546,0.00021289603,0.00027990234,0.0013083942,0.00069336913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013866462,0.00052457483,0.00028846614,0.0015009163,0.0032902432,0.0022841252,0.0012596888,0.0022708587,0.17976612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065360195,0.0006388178,0.00032953732,0.0021273012,0.0013491522,0.0020124298,0.0022483799,0.0014665828,0.06301942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058360047,0.000021037176,0.00022671795,0.00006820532,5.870185e-7,0.000061765684,0.00067182386,0.000063965694,0.00018232368,0.0029115118,0.951653,0.04413329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004432675,0.000006428294,0.0012969956,0.00013161976,8.67799e-7,0.00005489413,0.00046924924,0.00004080533,0.000093288516,0.0006317348,0.9972594,0.000010352547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46053925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6947169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5394608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009102392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02711953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91571724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203621158","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12540","title":"Identifying Coercive Control in Canadian Family Law: A Required Analysis in Determining the Best Interests of the Child","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Control (management); Psychology; Family law; Best interests; Psychological intervention; Political science; Law; Criminology; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05914237393214094,"score_gpt":0.35307707261047466,"score_spread":0.2939346986783337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203621158","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010166207,0.90868825,0.0016056523,0.031033223,0.0008707933,0.00018691356,0.00034413819,0.000011563353,0.047093205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25035685,0.72927314,0.0069186445,0.008180993,0.00032688768,0.00015366469,0.00033351145,0.000025755166,0.0044305134],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97125137,0.007260484,0.0022240134,0.0012806089,0.016096117,0.0018873382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92808574,0.032149404,0.0030011486,0.0015489608,0.034330763,0.00088408426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032580502,0.000585471,0.0012138133,0.015633313,0.0099446075,0.009393229,0.0034102467,0.00214875,0.0016957071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06715012,0.0006560573,0.0008755061,0.01599067,0.010702464,0.0037581658,0.0022240896,0.002898161,0.00014252913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007405024,0.000041645628,0.012758314,0.027449347,0.00035186036,0.0009862336,0.03224701,0.0010819371,0.00085821946,0.34711897,0.059578218,0.5174542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037370457,0.00005840772,0.05916592,0.0816341,0.0010371783,0.00085259625,0.02799391,0.0008752753,0.0015184924,0.032551683,0.7940475,0.00022762825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96959764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9874071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10612999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10612999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29927528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77003056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204812783","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12600","title":"The Family Resolutions Specialty Court (<scp>FRSC</scp>): An Evidence‐Informed Court‐Based Innovation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Coparenting; Empirical evidence; Process (computing); Dispute resolution; Specialty; Psychology; Law; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.11080895203991574,"score_gpt":0.37646367698812955,"score_spread":0.2656547249482138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204812783","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004561523,0.8793921,0.008093084,0.079957,0.004402593,0.00066544436,0.00011262514,0.0000647504,0.022750922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12944882,0.78054076,0.049795337,0.031586364,0.00318216,0.0009059996,0.00019503609,0.000075293996,0.0042702607],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9587993,0.029017068,0.003064182,0.0019691063,0.0064882496,0.0006620915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8384598,0.13713855,0.0056955526,0.004537849,0.012257978,0.0019102956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07407106,0.000515001,0.00107208,0.004612772,0.0015864031,0.0048218532,0.0031498068,0.004907834,0.0030189652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1081818,0.0005266811,0.0014557899,0.002561107,0.0045734756,0.0050155427,0.0030849706,0.004962429,0.00037044135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012765628,0.00022415705,0.00093495374,0.022932678,0.00032866854,0.00016308177,0.0015680706,0.00074632023,0.00032608904,0.11396493,0.024401862,0.8342815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000382221,0.0010623079,0.0061730775,0.17080432,0.0010671987,0.00056533277,0.0028074915,0.0007178628,0.0011574625,0.04568835,0.76945233,0.00012208946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016818432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034713015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07407106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008258957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035274625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3917299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221077201","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12640","title":"Ontario family justice in “lockdown”: Early pandemic cases and professional experience","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre; Queen's University; The King's University; St. Lawrence College; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Pandemic; Criminology; Welfare; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.1236343833310927,"score_gpt":0.4305607956654292,"score_spread":0.3069264123343365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221077201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87768716,0.0027808426,0.00048202675,0.04162739,0.00032153312,0.00015065937,0.00013342069,0.00002824439,0.07678881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712326,0.001901121,0.00029782043,0.0051119328,0.00006652304,0.00003881295,0.000055781693,0.000020927313,0.021274466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650013,0.0010246007,0.00008769074,0.00019092653,0.0007882471,0.0014083217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938677,0.001935769,0.0005273759,0.00018390725,0.0010626396,0.0024226368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030834912,0.00021400077,0.00024751472,0.00069040956,0.032017224,0.0033447202,0.0016810586,0.002836186,0.005968363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009715576,0.0003761013,0.0002404289,0.0014027589,0.008588153,0.001771958,0.0049599856,0.0027920774,0.00031813388],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006113639,0.00011319383,0.0185465,0.00013282454,0.000011074926,0.015476072,0.8902779,0.00020926209,0.0006508708,0.01228772,0.04107949,0.021153878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000120531895,0.00006983469,0.028927816,0.00021507234,0.000009596608,0.0026524165,0.7448087,0.00021682888,0.00023441591,0.0011582997,0.2216476,0.00004737624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8983933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.978157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10160673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060107414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06369285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4361118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231014250","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12371","title":"Issue Information","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Arizona State University; Newcastle University; Emory University","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.04355394329619234,"score_gpt":0.38976656757069666,"score_spread":0.34621262427450433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231014250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020487206,0.00062266015,0.0004981871,0.0036511256,0.009955207,0.0006340582,0.029590407,0.001048606,0.9537948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011620595,0.0005598146,0.00040241878,0.0024938318,0.0020774994,0.00026639356,0.010967373,0.00041323126,0.9816574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987525,0.00010851862,0.00010691958,0.00019838859,0.00070119405,0.00013255073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99447775,0.0011951327,0.00023246533,0.0004996605,0.0027289279,0.0008660737],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011679484,0.0008651723,0.001269937,0.003701915,0.0022892156,0.0059600095,0.0018116126,0.0030991677,0.91126066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00958869,0.0006389259,0.0007735972,0.003313018,0.00045408125,0.0026939912,0.0018423813,0.0023574862,0.8168237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016410388,0.000017649669,0.000040775103,0.00015253067,9.2009907e-7,0.000021750247,0.000011417108,0.000018205606,0.0000688239,0.0011164104,0.98123103,0.017303864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015004314,0.000010551146,0.0002291644,0.00010949094,0.0000012931783,0.000025290858,0.00002438634,0.000030943804,0.00006887381,0.0007835236,0.99869746,0.0000040506798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025020014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056736353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088739336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014105747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024343878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12657589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233979168","doi":"10.1177/153124450404200301","title":"Oh, Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.021145985572955488,"score_gpt":0.2626860896194885,"score_spread":0.24154010404653303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233979168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002248841,0.004311884,0.00015754822,0.010819254,0.0018112716,0.00017049734,0.005509265,0.00019638707,0.9747751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022578374,0.0010799184,0.00010419813,0.0012035812,0.000058897385,0.000029752566,0.00042279705,0.00004420762,0.9947988],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986645,0.000055320997,0.000036029796,0.00020673532,0.00065219036,0.00038524508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976992,0.00023458642,0.000060409482,0.00010870566,0.0014997289,0.00039733195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006441551,0.00092845963,0.00071331154,0.0019559667,0.01484603,0.005860244,0.0017142979,0.004702064,0.45418677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030608983,0.0010449497,0.00077565736,0.002766392,0.0011921047,0.0014730884,0.0012372367,0.0038107757,0.1060467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003657907,0.000023177437,0.0007928717,0.00007563048,0.00000815822,0.00014532766,0.00008502391,0.00008509789,0.0000874492,0.006865375,0.96732324,0.024472062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021798885,0.000006048923,0.0032823991,0.00010753913,0.0000114290715,0.00003938488,0.0002702755,0.000059150214,0.000067402754,0.0005611813,0.9955605,0.000012851498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9104368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9779162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45418677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019033534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06251257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241430101","doi":"10.1177/153124450404200307","title":"Elijah and Ishmael: Assessing Cultural Identity in Canadian Child Custody Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.055573893221110914,"score_gpt":0.3959579417072403,"score_spread":0.3403840484861294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241430101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48857766,0.24870318,0.001110555,0.14959347,0.0028453832,0.0008564216,0.0027440495,0.000028522947,0.10554077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9117958,0.05687825,0.002335791,0.013177055,0.00032753128,0.00026610447,0.0006871868,0.000024887671,0.014507297],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98849535,0.0029187321,0.00078805315,0.00035858926,0.0058784885,0.0015607441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.937697,0.017355738,0.0020205278,0.0005815566,0.03987794,0.0024672165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021558432,0.00047168686,0.0006538342,0.0111320345,0.016357029,0.0065378495,0.002955159,0.0024521134,0.0029062112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10088135,0.00035473096,0.00048560902,0.013886139,0.0038382208,0.0023711426,0.0025387397,0.0021023243,0.00017154586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048415826,0.00024477925,0.19884251,0.0038677475,0.00041117004,0.0014510251,0.088481255,0.0011774374,0.0005327892,0.05238791,0.2973896,0.35472962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014083044,0.00015133862,0.49447978,0.010813547,0.0016814466,0.00047979687,0.16932657,0.00076989096,0.0021068766,0.006134042,0.31361446,0.00030137578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9844243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99529415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07557012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07557012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19644387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5483022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245888572","doi":"10.1177/153124450404200308","title":"Assessments for Postseparation Parenting Disputes in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Psychology; Criminology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06501038362968176,"score_gpt":0.42279650164150706,"score_spread":0.3577861180118253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245888572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88550216,0.005032891,0.0007991357,0.031568676,0.00040291646,0.0008223298,0.0016233198,0.000058328962,0.07419013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769846,0.0017904415,0.0013881895,0.0030999861,0.000057263478,0.00015610202,0.0003710346,0.000023560417,0.01612871],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98870766,0.0016892722,0.00095341034,0.0005202211,0.003969601,0.004159806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9076822,0.014584773,0.0068978956,0.0009337829,0.056518245,0.013383051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009464692,0.00026977324,0.00048013264,0.0052139615,0.016344322,0.0045811585,0.0041061817,0.003613937,0.0059754592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0671074,0.0006980664,0.00057607726,0.0053322664,0.0018632626,0.00166847,0.0034781564,0.004326027,0.0003439106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004746466,0.0008157542,0.59814626,0.00077596295,0.00016897128,0.011287352,0.08198738,0.0027738207,0.001025001,0.039080564,0.1342177,0.12924665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114915056,0.0002608762,0.7800134,0.0013101657,0.0001703712,0.0021887354,0.09120001,0.0041235243,0.0015047227,0.004322962,0.114539474,0.00025081687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98072964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10346675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10346675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2491032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7507073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247836551","doi":"10.1177/1531244503252143","title":"Family/Child Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR): An Overview of One Canadian Court’s Settlement Conference Approach to the Pretrial Resolution of Family and Child Welfare/Protection Matters","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Child protection; Dispute resolution; Law; Family court; Family law; Resolution (logic); Welfare; Political science; Child custody; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.11223655617372083,"score_gpt":0.3229660813699467,"score_spread":0.21072952519622587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247836551","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03627769,0.55543244,0.0051248283,0.07667779,0.0026007574,0.002442339,0.00090809865,0.00018859007,0.32034746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39150265,0.43485266,0.022081546,0.04487708,0.0019025586,0.0011181537,0.0013295166,0.0002620629,0.10207368],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796687,0.00422957,0.001230608,0.0009961908,0.009536987,0.0043380377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97405034,0.008499532,0.00092824886,0.00049405673,0.013864009,0.0021639005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02576888,0.0007453223,0.0010054326,0.01544034,0.024076734,0.015089194,0.0049072145,0.0055912267,0.003696223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02242001,0.0011523794,0.0009058801,0.019590808,0.006856621,0.002436386,0.0033751638,0.0048315166,0.00046212494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120012,0.0003547279,0.005540067,0.005883551,0.000094807845,0.0016667938,0.026324473,0.0020050455,0.0018673632,0.16262543,0.18994994,0.6035678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003989256,0.0001234714,0.031892095,0.002330848,0.00010095719,0.0005186046,0.008262254,0.00045473283,0.0006532497,0.0048523825,0.95060205,0.00016945954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9571819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121284604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.121284604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25742775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8799855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251305574","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00901.x","title":"THE BOOKSHELF","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03815703054621018,"score_gpt":0.32618589465712,"score_spread":0.28802886411090983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251305574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042571843,0.14249401,0.0006461241,0.010588586,0.00607889,0.00007647079,0.0019596464,0.0004485001,0.837282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014226974,0.04699695,0.0007816304,0.0036580814,0.00087145885,0.000063661566,0.0011541876,0.00016403812,0.9448873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957174,0.000059687256,0.000024602075,0.0000680181,0.0002332669,0.000042683292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881613,0.00030175757,0.00006760208,0.00008062765,0.00057455036,0.00015936256],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042301926,0.0007766408,0.0008922372,0.0032648228,0.0016986164,0.003933875,0.0009855406,0.0021670826,0.42704764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032235933,0.00054419565,0.0004967592,0.0050606322,0.00048554398,0.00307893,0.0016206284,0.0019580324,0.2932445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006657867,0.0000059477998,0.00004131782,0.00014990111,0.0000014571681,0.000028280083,0.00004634624,0.000014588498,0.00005513239,0.0023086444,0.9304104,0.06693127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014891164,0.0000026108798,0.00013036391,0.00017164912,0.000001164696,0.00004385558,0.0000405597,0.000008152088,0.000012644422,0.0003119913,0.99927384,0.0000017970945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008658974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02936105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5729524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010559593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023792088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81724703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282968125","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12653","title":"In search of interdisciplinary, holistic and culturally informed services: The case of racialized immigrant women experiencing domestic violence in Ontario","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Sheridan College; Home and Community Care Support Services; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Domestic violence; Psychological intervention; Politics; Gender studies; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Nursing; Law; Social science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.0380522462476321,"score_gpt":0.3796454740467274,"score_spread":0.3415932277990953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282968125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92306,0.018730596,0.0001744759,0.026038025,0.0001825213,0.00024817593,0.0001715203,0.00000596197,0.03138875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97839785,0.015421986,0.00033904467,0.0022506323,0.000035028796,0.00006936621,0.00006173785,0.000004880697,0.0034195955],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981141,0.00074157334,0.00011080655,0.000071056806,0.00041690574,0.00054552295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575496,0.0014056334,0.00088106946,0.00015857852,0.0011502968,0.00064943876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029260695,0.00017743932,0.0002956528,0.00089210167,0.010020154,0.0025279087,0.001418254,0.0011685153,0.0020906425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076380814,0.00021267818,0.00018221278,0.0022265436,0.0029777195,0.00068061304,0.002285086,0.0008972428,0.00009721417],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019431762,0.0001556275,0.14185603,0.003959823,0.000096995456,0.030771358,0.63926446,0.0005905185,0.0019596226,0.023211213,0.022804055,0.13513601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022019067,0.00008560801,0.105723806,0.0030260775,0.00008419618,0.002592624,0.79091316,0.00014271056,0.00027885204,0.0007723937,0.096329294,0.000029259567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9102684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98360413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089731574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045693412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.096881054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33153045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283389650","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12656","title":"A three‐factor ethical reasoning model for court‐involved practitioners: Services, roles, and values","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Service (business); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Mental health; Political science; Law; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.14473066379222171,"score_gpt":0.4755129779907212,"score_spread":0.33078231419849946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283389650","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13048334,0.00063557713,0.5458348,0.05078475,0.00021570481,0.0022348335,0.00029885647,0.0003131858,0.269199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83445495,0.00022611256,0.15914899,0.00095250434,0.000047208065,0.00072684186,0.00014611905,0.000030030345,0.004267127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97133505,0.020788366,0.001053911,0.0011155797,0.0041123885,0.0015946412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9535926,0.028849937,0.0032645096,0.0016144505,0.009322303,0.0033562854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031074686,0.00096800685,0.0005254711,0.005261132,0.00576147,0.011358217,0.0032986703,0.004498683,0.0073713297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03693689,0.0006705253,0.0014850497,0.0030932012,0.018595172,0.009340373,0.0051105013,0.004176435,0.0011779105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004280696,0.00019813965,0.0074954834,0.00013856472,0.000029801313,0.00054782565,0.03945432,0.0038373158,0.00020353327,0.9260575,0.0035168957,0.018477796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009818542,0.000096568656,0.0039173597,0.000564289,0.00004997986,0.0007652309,0.045109678,0.044691302,0.00026166404,0.88251895,0.021847848,0.000078864556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016080625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016023906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031074686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013565366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023045555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16434062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296259834","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12679","title":"Are separated/divorced same sex families more likely to establish equal coparenting? A preliminary outcome from a <scp>court‐based</scp> program","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Coparenting; Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Child custody; Developmental psychology; Family court; Exploratory analysis; Exploratory research; Queer; Specialty; Social psychology; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06422227155853957,"score_gpt":0.3589954102109187,"score_spread":0.2947731386523791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296259834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965969,0.0012117395,0.0000389495,0.0006211568,0.000008036564,0.000016995698,0.000076367425,7.983074e-7,0.0014289987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910444,0.00045751227,0.00003558355,0.0000936725,0.000004778001,0.000011568548,0.00004254389,4.8882794e-7,0.0002493832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805593,0.0012339473,0.00007346621,0.00012909767,0.00027534188,0.00023229359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937884,0.0019985598,0.0024457437,0.00018696453,0.00064187014,0.00093832583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032953576,0.000062075174,0.00018840129,0.0003886503,0.0009871663,0.00061384065,0.00040210134,0.000260877,0.002453511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009734229,0.00007025514,0.00016828586,0.000513967,0.0004492664,0.0004711744,0.0004990291,0.0005370173,0.00011124203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003027513,0.00037122244,0.9404738,0.00014130371,0.00009802862,0.00078971253,0.008728547,0.00007444429,0.0002211162,0.0010715775,0.0014595549,0.046267804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025767959,0.00032032444,0.98206294,0.00011606341,0.000053213313,0.0002782775,0.015037236,0.000056363715,0.00010339524,0.00020357178,0.0017373007,0.0000055098576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035762947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10720237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035762947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011022241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019707736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07110953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311454691","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12684","title":"The polyamorous threat to nonmarriage","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; General partnership; Context (archaeology); Property (philosophy); Commission; Political science; Family law; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Geography","score_opus":0.05716655578579146,"score_gpt":0.3631655010110989,"score_spread":0.30599894522530746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311454691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28987527,0.0030186619,0.0077787447,0.2634583,0.0010076159,0.000061929524,0.00019370862,0.00006968371,0.4345361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537218,0.000746838,0.00067369407,0.025630262,0.00046004774,0.00003686151,0.000039591006,0.000020558944,0.018670363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832696,0.007880636,0.00047322584,0.0016376965,0.0035768857,0.0031619612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97829103,0.009767871,0.0031418407,0.002671791,0.0036382058,0.0024891899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009564317,0.00017442304,0.0002528457,0.0008414259,0.0112254275,0.0050346465,0.0014516867,0.0046559586,0.0097661065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02926231,0.0002545483,0.00023567946,0.00079580804,0.011453637,0.002952714,0.0097884415,0.007134502,0.00095748686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041556785,0.00006140833,0.01801372,0.000031333573,0.000008497928,0.001119097,0.016065596,0.00011894772,0.00044271,0.8915727,0.024991004,0.047533352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006237846,0.00020522502,0.04597843,0.00083582284,0.000046813588,0.00333226,0.048571456,0.0015687306,0.0016288168,0.2977436,0.5999005,0.00012595845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04805232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051002793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04805232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032184676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067092604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09554523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322764587","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12715","title":"A survey of mothers' experiences of shared parenting and domestic violence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Manitoba; University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Coparenting; Domestic violence; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Anxiety; Developmental psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Psychiatry; Medicine; Environmental health; Geography","score_opus":0.0687003093350203,"score_gpt":0.3804215828180953,"score_spread":0.311721273483075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322764587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99298286,0.0029238453,0.00006419168,0.00022487898,0.000013257873,0.00006734561,0.0013369952,0.0000042786633,0.00238237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908977,0.0064650048,0.00018250753,0.00013971244,0.000014596836,0.00009595118,0.0008864133,0.0000017023143,0.001316332],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926156,0.00025438942,0.00006956928,0.000038395374,0.00025801943,0.000118037104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975809,0.0004806262,0.00070250983,0.00005960429,0.0009150531,0.00026127032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014754443,0.000120466735,0.000216897,0.0011120347,0.00078975415,0.00042589474,0.00049505016,0.00017732262,0.001323616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036664999,0.00023400414,0.00013075146,0.0023912454,0.0002582087,0.00022357171,0.0004905468,0.00024365506,0.00015498546],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004164737,0.00005203102,0.93936735,0.00030896836,0.0000404164,0.0003543735,0.0256071,0.000026484571,0.00026100478,0.0000587508,0.0018042834,0.032077502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032047135,0.00006705962,0.9788574,0.00018121851,0.000013118827,0.00019243057,0.017087633,0.000016149088,0.0000612281,0.000006520405,0.0035099317,0.0000040266013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5223295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.648006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5223295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028153933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035476158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9609672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323849814","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12716","title":"The use of parental alienation constructs by family justice system professionals: A survey of belief systems and practice implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Alienation; Psychological intervention; Phenomenon; Psychology; Family law; Family court; Quality (philosophy); Economic Justice; Criminology; Social psychology; Public relations; Law; Political science; Psychiatry; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16363727626971855,"score_gpt":0.39627285765925985,"score_spread":0.2326355813895413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323849814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99205726,0.00418576,0.00022503885,0.0016933132,0.000017146825,0.000054983924,0.00003469698,0.0000022654526,0.0017295398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970421,0.0022396217,0.00018634976,0.00028740382,0.000009686207,0.00004922309,0.000019687517,0.00000147703,0.000164556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841248,0.010779465,0.0012779025,0.000568764,0.0023192372,0.00092979625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94741625,0.033484906,0.01049924,0.00083874835,0.0061877435,0.0015731843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02477757,0.0001290727,0.00042003492,0.0026210994,0.0015578186,0.002009904,0.0005558319,0.00091091014,0.0008606189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05862944,0.00037767357,0.00029119093,0.0018595462,0.0016775324,0.001440884,0.0019675659,0.0009686347,0.00009990268],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004674856,0.00010893172,0.6274291,0.0005719615,0.00006025835,0.0003039773,0.31472108,0.00004060695,0.00031003123,0.0006160976,0.000971479,0.054819714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013501904,0.00026608258,0.51313746,0.0015405988,0.00004118231,0.0007265852,0.4744123,0.00020660138,0.00016024406,0.00038740234,0.009075073,0.000032943615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010885902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016198145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02477757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018522358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004880491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13103789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386543603","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12757","title":"Guest editors' introduction to the 2023 special issue on parenting plan evaluations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Support in Illness","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Citation; Commons; Plan (archaeology); History; Operations research; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06020623463012873,"score_gpt":0.37339416723758,"score_spread":0.31318793260745126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386543603","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018683994,0.011999898,0.00078895147,0.056166306,0.91494817,0.00010818416,0.00025557776,0.00031056724,0.01523544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001737931,0.016235739,0.0013073006,0.04309333,0.8815244,0.00022779136,0.00037416074,0.00041744768,0.05508195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99303645,0.0010749828,0.00094617525,0.0007388428,0.003660992,0.0005424936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572991,0.010429904,0.0027832778,0.0013158487,0.022578197,0.0055936663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008833746,0.0020480403,0.0017244146,0.0060661267,0.0026054766,0.009931762,0.0022163729,0.0053844196,0.073859744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042325918,0.0010849233,0.0018371344,0.002464133,0.0014795744,0.0049422304,0.0033128303,0.007814236,0.047290493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007047452,0.000008568651,0.00004750953,0.00008038483,0.0000019347142,0.000029457478,0.000018740087,0.000011203479,0.000046298504,0.00018754239,0.9877722,0.011789287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010463681,0.000030329105,0.00046727064,0.00047014616,0.000006629804,0.00023323928,0.000064629625,0.000062447325,0.000059605107,0.0006209156,0.997959,0.000015268244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014551947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004557357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073859744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029502653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00415097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24708551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386571517","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12759","title":"Judicial decision‐making in family court involving children with autism spectrum disorder","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family and Disability Support Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Education and Early Childhood Development; Western University; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Family court; Autism spectrum disorder; Psychology; Autism; Child custody; Population; Primary care; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine; Family medicine; Law; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.04299786096445341,"score_gpt":0.3688567475752022,"score_spread":0.3258588866107488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386571517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662969,0.008624385,0.00071838696,0.0036435954,0.00016790429,0.00024187997,0.00034021982,0.000012896876,0.019953817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992963,0.0026196712,0.00087644043,0.00050437945,0.000039975872,0.000048096746,0.00011455732,0.000004747096,0.0028290846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849318,0.0088252425,0.0011302829,0.0005971688,0.003317388,0.0011980721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8867449,0.06976333,0.020403076,0.0013299452,0.01859287,0.0031658409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022168212,0.00020351155,0.0003805531,0.0028498105,0.004747781,0.0025265804,0.0013522853,0.0011832871,0.0032468105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073596574,0.00027813914,0.00024548112,0.0019921428,0.0021026453,0.00078489486,0.0012710765,0.0014145559,0.00024468638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005625934,0.00036094952,0.60874647,0.0014231841,0.00016615089,0.021681566,0.1324019,0.0017532345,0.0020380116,0.009134819,0.038788933,0.18294221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054996075,0.00046364614,0.7029828,0.0036689793,0.00014469471,0.0087407,0.17398092,0.0019510023,0.002789202,0.0032499991,0.10177756,0.00019549749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24349214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6178881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24349214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013251997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020902345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4841497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389569375","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12768","title":"Engaging fathers who commit family violence: Issues and challenges for family courts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Domestic violence; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Accountability; Masculinity; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.10965329013690304,"score_gpt":0.38517374517421604,"score_spread":0.275520455037313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389569375","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017921436,0.93307364,0.00030743965,0.058972456,0.0021692105,0.00006751357,0.000019575675,0.000006441535,0.0035916148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03604284,0.94633394,0.0016035693,0.013007202,0.0014315593,0.0001898064,0.000032261192,0.000011659774,0.0013471245],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96663004,0.024745677,0.0029940114,0.0006975167,0.0039119944,0.0010207533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9112132,0.0608883,0.005779145,0.0012643897,0.017941916,0.0029129426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05191141,0.00033985244,0.0012283418,0.0020063939,0.0025562297,0.0047822865,0.0020899961,0.004033451,0.003023649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08895763,0.0004454812,0.0011472474,0.0019625598,0.0019254257,0.0037231853,0.0023803816,0.0043650568,0.00048664465],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010918224,0.00015255228,0.0026301343,0.032363642,0.00028249185,0.0007327155,0.0063179024,0.0002668487,0.00020805975,0.018160723,0.07072597,0.8680497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114718096,0.0006057098,0.007874151,0.2346147,0.0005810484,0.0019705163,0.02000671,0.0001268129,0.00025730886,0.0064481446,0.7273224,0.0000777693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023211509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09336522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05191141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004703792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02522483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2745371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389766597","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12770","title":"Defining points and transformative turns in family violence, parenting and coparenting disputes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coparenting; Transformative learning; Domestic violence; Psychology; SAFER; Social psychology; Criminology; Poison control; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Computer security; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.030887422729699094,"score_gpt":0.3412734739194597,"score_spread":0.31038605118976065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389766597","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009774336,0.9906599,0.00072938384,0.0038293286,0.000935404,0.000018380968,0.0000064019987,0.0000022484016,0.0028414442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034564946,0.95952964,0.0019807783,0.0020543153,0.0009535594,0.000078981524,0.000021629692,0.000006677862,0.0008095343],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804494,0.0143501945,0.0016826252,0.0006380988,0.0024768135,0.00040298747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9590273,0.03232738,0.0030162656,0.0005955723,0.0046422863,0.00039123435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017136376,0.0005179326,0.0011769627,0.007423013,0.0012896188,0.0043111164,0.0013152988,0.002573174,0.0010819987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03020121,0.00040621552,0.00096070615,0.0050397776,0.009659313,0.0061640064,0.003219078,0.0047905203,0.00020034269],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011147555,0.000061906176,0.0019244988,0.03500922,0.00030145652,0.0006603237,0.0225645,0.000828021,0.0005066408,0.33728907,0.027498944,0.573244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003139215,0.00018162846,0.005035324,0.10386723,0.0003004496,0.0025233105,0.019841671,0.0002741266,0.0005360974,0.063356034,0.8039572,0.00009551825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071015037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014898985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017136376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050053094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00745772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090626895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400098981","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12796","title":"A collaborative approach to develop indigenous specific parenting education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Psychology; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Criminology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.030553675903195923,"score_gpt":0.3441045795607431,"score_spread":0.3135509036575472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400098981","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10155817,0.46764758,0.032537006,0.0800903,0.009768227,0.017028002,0.00033724448,0.000267624,0.29076597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5877272,0.26286003,0.08307494,0.014026975,0.0011771065,0.008911043,0.0003464494,0.000068561574,0.04180772],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907259,0.0060778474,0.0006388805,0.00050895696,0.0013902524,0.00065831235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883782,0.0055881375,0.0011347756,0.0007995535,0.0025286954,0.0015706372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020459833,0.00031641487,0.00039188485,0.0019534114,0.0022109644,0.0017907933,0.0025317036,0.0016969377,0.007382716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02230983,0.00021685191,0.0007177537,0.0013128321,0.0011792948,0.0016173596,0.0058127414,0.0022031413,0.00059642625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008042537,0.0011606651,0.001695526,0.0133638065,0.000161952,0.0007103748,0.018118238,0.0004031233,0.000760169,0.046345297,0.020183768,0.8970167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047092396,0.0014275406,0.014421313,0.03825598,0.0005487731,0.0013280241,0.016895562,0.0004042151,0.0018314047,0.0075902203,0.9167808,0.000045103603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025237592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06450139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025237592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061868476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029684063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10820323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401002424","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12801","title":"Educating for change: A meta‐analysis of education programs for separating and divorcing parents","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Psychology; Medical education; Meta-analysis; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.23448553269759304,"score_gpt":0.4575250408737663,"score_spread":0.22303950817617324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401002424","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010442907,0.98704624,0.00051881874,0.00026692872,0.00022799053,0.00068904884,0.00030484333,0.00002894958,0.00047422893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23564343,0.7578168,0.0028656723,0.0008843351,0.00020078427,0.0017255149,0.00045197495,0.0000317477,0.0003797965],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.99340194,0.0035500592,0.001589223,0.00055122527,0.0007059018,0.00020156607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881656,0.00917909,0.001488848,0.00029301614,0.00067381083,0.0001995993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01050561,0.0016495043,0.012097637,0.0041760067,0.00064976513,0.0027500652,0.0014267464,0.0017051023,0.0047607566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02628299,0.0008613048,0.025651142,0.0039456636,0.0006355806,0.0015384078,0.0011355825,0.0021603876,0.00023185878],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006606448,0.00024292059,0.001477281,0.52406096,0.408251,0.00012544631,0.00023690703,0.0005041743,0.00031570724,0.0002632417,0.0007248864,0.05719115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036778837,0.0014881714,0.0044496413,0.07666235,0.90919197,0.00008169381,0.00014643605,0.00018756319,0.00028630812,0.0002826486,0.0035163828,0.000029040424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073624514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016042864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012097637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027878443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034336452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055559695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402275693","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12824","title":"October 2024","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.057209854934933226,"score_gpt":0.416520463790794,"score_spread":0.35931060885586075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402275693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039827323,0.00247856,0.0003278466,0.012915368,0.039362893,0.0002215564,0.0021511156,0.0006902176,0.9414542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006692469,0.00036252043,0.000075543845,0.0038990022,0.0016182283,0.000055432803,0.0005493016,0.00012711041,0.99264365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988668,0.000119652235,0.000067481196,0.00021383539,0.00049823965,0.00023401405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812573,0.00017580156,0.0000839676,0.00016159081,0.0009926156,0.00046023674],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010964449,0.0009908406,0.00058838807,0.0013988707,0.0028240008,0.006800964,0.0011470207,0.0041813483,0.7475554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046632965,0.00043888588,0.00068219466,0.0008467097,0.00058489264,0.0024160324,0.0027053722,0.0038531793,0.66579705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010743787,0.000009831787,0.000054840017,0.000027013533,9.1189025e-7,0.000040362636,0.0000130251865,0.000008056529,0.000063306936,0.001438578,0.9844619,0.013871438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002449366,0.000004636728,0.00018163666,0.000031565283,3.862402e-7,0.000016984935,0.000025113628,0.0000070393057,0.000015108891,0.00014741262,0.99956554,0.000002072637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006625008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016012143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25244462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017169816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00240571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3600816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402416649","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12819","title":"Exploring litigation abuse in Ontario: An analysis of costs decisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Criminology; Business; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.3093681621485638,"score_gpt":0.44585235867958023,"score_spread":0.13648419653101646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402416649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935442,0.00015173755,0.00007552251,0.0002655261,0.0000027283077,0.00007610838,0.0005904137,0.0000020145885,0.00529168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960424,0.00035043035,0.00018458194,0.000057091947,0.0000062984404,0.000046064626,0.0005241485,0.000002702266,0.0027863148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624133,0.00058214035,0.00023055133,0.00019180209,0.001827878,0.0009263738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810889,0.0063199154,0.0061526434,0.00040149209,0.0046411506,0.001395907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001957221,0.00019518257,0.00030479138,0.0039472175,0.0037434336,0.0018799619,0.00095851417,0.00052107347,0.0037053232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012684456,0.00034429,0.00043555687,0.008610263,0.0012414036,0.00071179145,0.0014750081,0.00060810114,0.00021515938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022438506,0.00018565205,0.9403241,0.0001299128,0.000074533724,0.001812585,0.032674935,0.0013320792,0.0004562826,0.0015378353,0.0020731366,0.019174624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004533096,0.00004337079,0.97318876,0.000029547526,0.0000139368985,0.000095298565,0.021630011,0.00077264686,0.00007074583,0.00010487633,0.004033718,0.000012539077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9585953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06269655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06269655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030720595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4548974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405963121","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12840","title":"Embracing Neurodivergence: Essential considerations in family law practice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Langley Environmental Partners Society; Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Neurotypical; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Stigma (botany); Presentation (obstetrics); Social psychology; Public relations; Internet privacy; Sociology; Political science; Developmental psychology; Autism; Computer science; Medicine; Social science; Autism spectrum disorder","score_opus":0.05977757176808055,"score_gpt":0.3733857007252274,"score_spread":0.31360812895714685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405963121","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075625326,0.48447734,0.002253539,0.48034254,0.0028487823,0.00008824505,0.000011323408,0.000021424597,0.02239423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35883695,0.5029383,0.011308365,0.11691358,0.004033539,0.0005282522,0.000028120836,0.000037570815,0.0053753825],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.948748,0.04003413,0.0028697052,0.0011363599,0.005317194,0.0018947108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88285536,0.097207226,0.0052132187,0.0015719193,0.00889061,0.004261732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051293682,0.00036144943,0.0011110863,0.0023484419,0.0075515104,0.009385414,0.0027869032,0.011667077,0.002416237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080720335,0.00050784106,0.0005977642,0.001956434,0.021618238,0.012300653,0.0061754733,0.009275583,0.00035918353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004594608,0.00016117819,0.004350467,0.009026401,0.00005267859,0.0073340624,0.10844784,0.00042401388,0.0004584436,0.33962625,0.0981564,0.43191633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032160966,0.00014553146,0.0044351905,0.054185715,0.000050944,0.009138512,0.098348215,0.00013235673,0.00020633145,0.085924804,0.7472796,0.00012063578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020121993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056114424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051293682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010331676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037801735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27127016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406245872","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12842","title":"Consideration of culture in Canadian courtrooms: Before and after the Divorce Act amendments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous culture; Child custody; Law; Competence (human resources); Cultural heritage; Culturally appropriate; Psychology; Cultural competence; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.022894550715127047,"score_gpt":0.3387061541134731,"score_spread":0.3158116033983461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406245872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88637584,0.018151004,0.00034163782,0.022849033,0.00045762674,0.00022467849,0.00027606057,0.000012158173,0.071311906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865617,0.0051310477,0.00032091935,0.002344484,0.000046833142,0.000030083662,0.00007329293,0.0000058285978,0.0054858318],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860584,0.0037240982,0.00060055737,0.00072572014,0.006227425,0.0026637528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650945,0.012022093,0.0030922405,0.0006251954,0.015561371,0.0036045506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014442252,0.00018702046,0.00040933132,0.0027760973,0.020854343,0.0068359193,0.002377427,0.0016207998,0.003076095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04153486,0.00030124353,0.00031795894,0.0053049284,0.005370046,0.00177785,0.0032205626,0.002335807,0.000114222334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002729478,0.00023436318,0.14548118,0.0010403806,0.00008328982,0.003329564,0.5447653,0.00062772003,0.0020221467,0.048407022,0.031526722,0.22220936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020671854,0.00010138652,0.30330157,0.0016524431,0.00007031048,0.00025131484,0.56183153,0.00021062039,0.00089939503,0.0013019126,0.13023084,0.00012808589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9760031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12161856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12161856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18745324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88240856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411732146","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70001","title":"“Parental alienation” cases: Experiences of Ontario legal and mental health professionals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Mental health; Health professionals; Psychology; Psychiatry; Criminology; Political science; Law; Health care","score_opus":0.031374619939339064,"score_gpt":0.3722264591293611,"score_spread":0.34085183919002204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411732146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9609319,0.00793323,0.00014582076,0.008435299,0.0001252567,0.00008166809,0.00009310215,0.0000069481453,0.022246823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874676,0.006908307,0.000119043165,0.0018447052,0.000050221508,0.00006309842,0.000060637652,0.0000062623476,0.0034801709],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909911,0.0047860267,0.00031615744,0.00036198227,0.0017446838,0.0018000482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824119,0.00974366,0.0030476043,0.0005214582,0.0023549118,0.0019204591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007238131,0.0002759034,0.0005204143,0.0015415107,0.014794525,0.0034201236,0.0016110705,0.0017782248,0.002942645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018003542,0.0004842353,0.00024524107,0.003915149,0.0069671334,0.0018248899,0.005710094,0.0014472441,0.00015083887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000331655,0.00002365674,0.009693784,0.00022597576,0.0000074500813,0.0021145677,0.9727017,0.000023133629,0.00012687423,0.0011130647,0.003461918,0.01047472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000718528,0.000040792256,0.019656925,0.00048144875,0.0000089904015,0.0008436146,0.93700737,0.000022842962,0.0000736344,0.00013024884,0.041714177,0.000012795033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6712876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85879093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3287124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035078328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043846857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6612965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411891855","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70002","title":"Appropriate parenting arrangements in cases of intimate partner violence and coercive control: From research and legislative reform to changes in practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Western University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Domestic violence; Psychology; Control (management); Criminology; Political science; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Law; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency; Economics","score_opus":0.08372236204773302,"score_gpt":0.43959303848143705,"score_spread":0.355870676433704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411891855","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005959765,0.99315554,0.00006259668,0.004539267,0.00030982474,0.000014097078,0.0000066102116,0.0000013721799,0.0013146942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014671631,0.98281497,0.0002652173,0.001512037,0.0005065723,0.000032292985,0.00001585747,0.0000021675903,0.00017924633],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97420424,0.016607914,0.0036530024,0.0010806017,0.0035820582,0.0008721598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8873913,0.08822635,0.009205339,0.0023381037,0.011669071,0.0011697584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03607915,0.00036983073,0.0014224687,0.005330974,0.001263294,0.00377226,0.0020184808,0.0038075442,0.0019273417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080386505,0.0005838194,0.0009224605,0.0051567014,0.0063810186,0.0041813105,0.0018827745,0.003953377,0.0003136278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013095405,0.00014644816,0.0022208763,0.04150351,0.00020051327,0.00043300752,0.002341942,0.0004667296,0.00022252464,0.04183853,0.024637474,0.8858574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013655989,0.00055808027,0.020106059,0.31566375,0.0005294446,0.0023074765,0.007887039,0.0002490319,0.0005517966,0.01377601,0.63811445,0.000120328325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01843519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036114637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03607915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006934565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020767055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1908071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414925403","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70020","title":"Developing a formal model of peer support for bereaved military families: A co‐production and evidence‐based approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer support; Grounded theory; Narrative; Process (computing); Grief; Peer review; Technical peer review; Social support","score_opus":0.1575939744729757,"score_gpt":0.41264532237837565,"score_spread":0.25505134790539996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414925403","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087360226,0.030860944,0.6536739,0.050877042,0.0015468915,0.032298923,0.0007344733,0.00058219704,0.1420654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.476706,0.010067055,0.49836102,0.001232347,0.000116956166,0.010252175,0.00023419279,0.000057510635,0.0029727686],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9152148,0.07144412,0.00365841,0.0020384735,0.0066592456,0.0009849812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8823061,0.084329285,0.005893185,0.007875672,0.016870327,0.0027254294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09619318,0.0012916771,0.0011747456,0.008590722,0.003814255,0.009791483,0.0063234335,0.0033472166,0.0044648433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0938951,0.0011239033,0.0016043894,0.0033914945,0.006816623,0.008437996,0.010771604,0.0029762604,0.00089102995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030890692,0.0017458661,0.009144706,0.031986173,0.0005698501,0.0025067728,0.100255564,0.013001658,0.0026167934,0.35106763,0.008625242,0.4781708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009796913,0.0036862048,0.009084293,0.09082383,0.001957135,0.0025827803,0.13273875,0.039742455,0.005833193,0.2631122,0.44901627,0.0004433093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007142647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018084787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09619318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012281538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040456053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5087242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414976091","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70025","title":"The family experience of the Invictus Games through a work family conflict lens: An interpretative phenomenological analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Workaholism, burnout, and well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretative phenomenological analysis; Work–family conflict; Inclusion (mineral); Selection (genetic algorithm); Family conflict; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04989425899837327,"score_gpt":0.36568738814648305,"score_spread":0.31579312914810975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414976091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95594245,0.014529414,0.0027988167,0.006441857,0.00020807005,0.00023416,0.00014544996,0.000008327653,0.01969149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99243164,0.0051309983,0.00042882015,0.00034831194,0.000028875867,0.00009550037,0.000028065844,0.000004613481,0.0015030933],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951853,0.0039724996,0.00013531018,0.00013312134,0.0002604173,0.0003132739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929651,0.0052372576,0.00072248525,0.00014636466,0.00059640827,0.00033241656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062347646,0.0003143013,0.00046633856,0.0019248904,0.00604302,0.003585464,0.0008056989,0.0007681919,0.0012987896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074388185,0.00021455485,0.0002462662,0.0019500711,0.0051237075,0.0024564199,0.002268223,0.0013930226,0.00009401465],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003398497,0.000032839114,0.004232415,0.00031177542,0.000007849373,0.0012999232,0.977445,0.00006408455,0.0001980524,0.005807745,0.0010229851,0.0095432345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022725703,0.000020194097,0.0036449735,0.0004299045,0.000005031303,0.0002868834,0.9842275,0.000036744088,0.00007821042,0.00047635377,0.010785017,0.0000070214182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016623722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030406397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016623722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00540529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044623283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039218307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415098202","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70023","title":"Strengthening military and veteran couple relationships: A rapid review of the effectiveness of relationship education for military couples","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relationship education; Military service; Military personnel; Value (mathematics); Service member; Military organization","score_opus":0.055035253349454125,"score_gpt":0.34385387038758125,"score_spread":0.2888186170381271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415098202","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035206918,0.99881077,0.000047421083,0.00021118058,0.00010980265,0.00009599899,0.00007011403,0.0000031907755,0.00029954474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039655846,0.9951513,0.0002916686,0.0003014853,0.000049372524,0.000108548265,0.000042893837,0.0000025259487,0.00008655361],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953863,0.001699831,0.0015291448,0.00028039163,0.0009486218,0.00015567317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699043,0.023437403,0.0030242375,0.00029523714,0.0030670646,0.00027178632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008709907,0.0009357347,0.0042441497,0.0077474313,0.00053964654,0.0026465796,0.0013587724,0.0016541195,0.004435456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033794347,0.00075174717,0.0037853352,0.0070536085,0.00064760004,0.0019207268,0.0012851077,0.0014580347,0.00037840515],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023700747,0.000035140303,0.0003080771,0.81043106,0.0025266358,0.00009542245,0.00029209213,0.00011379183,0.0002568715,0.00040651884,0.0032838294,0.18201365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012981913,0.00037215187,0.002448523,0.9164484,0.013588546,0.00027674154,0.00039731513,0.000045265657,0.00022931832,0.00022633499,0.06581226,0.000025344798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071255635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020290878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008709907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033946806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008408202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046062946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415991347","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12794","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Chicago; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; Hamline University; San José State University; Arizona State University","keywords":"","score_opus":0.02369371920927582,"score_gpt":0.3023206595891107,"score_spread":0.2786269403798349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415991347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031705952,0.00048047776,0.00034018376,0.0048590577,0.006533659,0.00059279444,0.0073157535,0.00080659875,0.97875446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006199046,0.00015204033,0.00012813254,0.0022284589,0.00090766384,0.0001410796,0.0011140872,0.00011488125,0.9945939],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978294,0.00020521862,0.0000994085,0.00026787925,0.001315068,0.00028293603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948,0.0013605389,0.00018160857,0.00043297233,0.0023894317,0.0008354965],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021739108,0.0011117889,0.0015930503,0.0048830556,0.0042880657,0.008809522,0.002651233,0.009737599,0.7567352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012341481,0.0010218526,0.0012740648,0.0027248843,0.00090458244,0.002306277,0.0020383126,0.004457406,0.6927873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018781931,0.0000296446,0.000051437786,0.0000601469,0.0000019887993,0.00002911031,0.000011270261,0.000027894694,0.000058533642,0.0020596534,0.9863665,0.011285124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004152621,0.000023927776,0.00069643074,0.00013666475,0.0000058809806,0.000032196658,0.0000474661,0.0001349178,0.000121743324,0.0016569579,0.99708986,0.000012457851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011582231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040268797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2432648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027268168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051982747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34698766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117124360","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70035","title":"New footprints on an old trail","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Field (mathematics); Family law; Publishing; Mental health; Learning disability","score_opus":0.08069392064567658,"score_gpt":0.44890399487255994,"score_spread":0.36821007422688334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117124360","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013655127,0.0607365,0.0031701408,0.7670872,0.09328997,0.000042843087,0.000340177,0.0003683075,0.07359935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07676719,0.097626865,0.011813619,0.44883046,0.14770222,0.00029803906,0.00077537034,0.002195117,0.21399112],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697109,0.01033241,0.0017541928,0.0036252553,0.012167469,0.0024098298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87732375,0.04678006,0.004244821,0.01996604,0.034233727,0.017451659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037343875,0.00088914717,0.0017596988,0.0066975513,0.013073665,0.032249015,0.0030452206,0.00916562,0.05681956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10832157,0.0009121121,0.001202753,0.0044653453,0.022468677,0.039150085,0.01109646,0.017820574,0.01757079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051391064,0.000048862305,0.0003784516,0.00034018524,0.00002651573,0.00022893627,0.002258054,0.00006326907,0.00016456607,0.14115624,0.7840538,0.07122973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045575084,0.000010437833,0.00014637932,0.00038138905,0.0000036275655,0.00009063165,0.0013697695,0.000024260497,0.000032402797,0.023306437,0.97461504,0.000015126566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005853811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120618045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05681956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068653254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019685807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19749564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117721721","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70048","title":"January Editorial Note","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.016524548138654747,"score_gpt":0.3669768116449299,"score_spread":0.3504522635062752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117721721","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001754509,0.002757061,0.00013260689,0.25765988,0.68342656,0.000116157,0.0002364731,0.00015942508,0.05533642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001987643,0.0020468046,0.00022269634,0.32267475,0.42427653,0.00021464101,0.0001583807,0.00016827045,0.24825032],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933749,0.0008819805,0.000509444,0.00094844133,0.0032724848,0.0010127368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98082054,0.0066147693,0.0009715087,0.0010374946,0.008010526,0.0025452133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064723296,0.001348524,0.001790905,0.0030841317,0.007170236,0.011214244,0.0036118082,0.02747849,0.12106101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043284073,0.0010781449,0.0018787821,0.0018178774,0.00212392,0.0030755687,0.0023896932,0.017984265,0.070437014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068966356,0.0000048270545,0.000017325876,0.000024746725,0.0000021055105,0.000039435712,0.000014424687,0.000004409332,0.000013382272,0.0003489232,0.99754626,0.0019773226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023526534,0.0000076209517,0.00024278731,0.00018286254,0.000009933197,0.000039983017,0.000073509735,0.000025354571,0.000047231577,0.00074894313,0.99858814,0.000009882061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012658601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030095667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12106101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005673649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008226312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40498942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117722613","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70046","title":"Introduction: <scp> <i>Family court review</i> </scp> special feature on changeovers, choices, and challenges—Understanding children and young people's between‐home transitions after parental separation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Everyday life; Feature (linguistics); Work (physics); Window (computing); Life span; Connection (principal bundle); Ethnography","score_opus":0.03270032002812275,"score_gpt":0.29093760638504057,"score_spread":0.25823728635691784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117722613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014979319,0.20461023,0.0011927884,0.3139886,0.16625637,0.00073656335,0.011140726,0.00058629375,0.29999048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024083758,0.2721477,0.0011806631,0.21968615,0.12283416,0.0013624086,0.010270344,0.0009277857,0.34750703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983359,0.00035502808,0.00016109625,0.00021602644,0.00073735055,0.00019451161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859176,0.0038688993,0.00078024814,0.0006613152,0.0072592315,0.0015126327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020338325,0.0006780628,0.0006849908,0.0035057417,0.0030017546,0.004830091,0.0025858334,0.004893918,0.1993822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013088296,0.00045077363,0.0008988643,0.0036772108,0.0013459354,0.0040358882,0.0031017426,0.004319006,0.05321212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004217648,0.0000029850983,0.00006783945,0.00025023933,0.0000018087862,0.000038000773,0.00004678505,0.00001094298,0.000022095523,0.0005064185,0.98870146,0.010347113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032509545,0.0000070166593,0.0013542118,0.0025739253,0.0000032247142,0.00014646075,0.0002691147,0.00001681146,0.000030003384,0.00055465865,0.9950328,0.000008386981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041648973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06613836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1993822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005435897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006161664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66699994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}