{"meta":{"query_hash":"27a81af7ef4a","filters":{"venue":"Family Court Review"},"cohort_total":97,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":97,"exported":97,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/27a81af7ef4a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Family+Court+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1481274874","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00651.x","title":"UNIFIED FAMILY COURTS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Family court; Law; State (computer science); Family law; Locality; Domestic violence; Political science; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Computer science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.049079225151470625,"score_gpt":0.3549844254956223,"score_spread":0.3059052003441517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481274874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004559754,0.20323583,0.0010518505,0.0032511437,0.001228175,0.0011299178,0.00001877745,0.00036164388,0.7851629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3626425,0.6058427,0.0013781749,0.027354462,0.00051175663,0.00010545768,0.000024904273,0.000044561213,0.0020954784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756813,0.00022877236,0.0004491674,0.00038874854,0.0007292724,0.0006358955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988218,0.00007895961,0.00013887783,0.00044555304,0.0002613891,0.00025339983],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001559284,0.00023405808,0.00047098863,0.000060931783,0.00054546294,0.0000804432,0.00060065463,0.0001414286,0.00017106404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021430485,0.00021320404,0.00019761277,0.00047778653,0.00030908053,0.00025801116,0.00006445035,0.00027200923,0.002117838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020458549,0.00035774434,0.0004485168,0.0017099023,0.000091096634,0.00015993947,0.0030855555,0.00006729395,0.0011241011,0.66042364,0.2684074,0.064104326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003153969,0.000041928684,0.010630531,0.0038465094,0.0000798122,0.0000028712266,0.0006949769,0.00000336055,0.000015695365,0.0043580458,0.9796189,0.00039193957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017615976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003651275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7830674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021629741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000599114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491038314","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00054.x","title":"TIPPINS AND WITTMANN ASKED THE WRONG QUESTION:. Evaluators May Not be \"Experts,\" But They Can Express Best Interests Opinions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychology; Child custody; Best interests; Family law; Law; Process (computing); Reliability (semiconductor); Resolution (logic); Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08894869586451364,"score_gpt":0.3804127153912334,"score_spread":0.29146401952671974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491038314","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050494634,0.34417462,0.000053654454,0.5229594,0.0013807135,0.0020509593,0.0001542527,0.00017724723,0.07855448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76381177,0.22523928,0.00007785668,0.0092215035,0.0007065157,0.00013504075,0.000011059506,0.000008424633,0.0007885631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998175,0.00040404242,0.0003055067,0.00027226054,0.00054102566,0.00030212625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915063,0.00021692437,0.00010764954,0.00021553999,0.0001786593,0.00013057164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010675563,0.00017795303,0.00031324546,0.00002656089,0.0012404667,0.000075083444,0.0003353152,0.000066150096,0.000077127035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039011618,0.000118417905,0.00010233133,0.0001514894,0.00070145616,0.00015029556,0.00013220083,0.00015404094,0.00006697373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024144721,0.0002620587,0.006247035,0.00030511385,0.0002710484,0.0000127585845,0.0150205055,0.000014302386,0.000074732074,0.59546053,0.19850828,0.18379949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010342575,0.000026103944,0.005565616,0.0017839797,0.000090583584,0.0000032084902,0.0022031919,0.000008083973,0.0000025615705,0.00043519182,0.9895982,0.00017984035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009401503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01792238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79108995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012607116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028271947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537039636","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01322.x","title":"VAN DUZER MEMORIAL ORATION: THE EFFECT OF ARMED CONFLICT ON CHILD HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Government (linguistics); Armed conflict; Health care; Political science; Criminology; Medicine; Economic growth; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.06207673110957574,"score_gpt":0.4272738624347511,"score_spread":0.36519713132517534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537039636","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14342697,0.4662968,0.0000940382,0.3100081,0.010515427,0.019418977,0.000060546314,0.0002499046,0.049929246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13171045,0.454334,0.0005594266,0.40303245,0.0042749997,0.0034106907,0.00012901635,0.00012122951,0.002427759],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741536,0.00073618296,0.0008521737,0.00024175452,0.0003258583,0.00042867006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786776,0.000954163,0.0004067712,0.00038825948,0.0001299968,0.00025302268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031116328,0.00020961392,0.0007416944,0.000036533464,0.0012032076,0.0000049075798,0.0001620143,0.000109665445,0.0001607922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006871562,0.000114835726,0.000053254087,0.00014413074,0.00008425492,0.000031862055,0.000082314175,0.00090455415,0.0002535482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042524922,0.000112236194,0.013683986,0.046572305,0.00023062449,0.0000044422695,0.026329558,3.7728097e-7,0.000069617156,0.0024324371,0.4043394,0.5057998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007637696,0.0003352986,0.01692525,0.004081091,0.000021963484,0.0000013648628,0.00013437284,0.0000014525302,0.000009897794,0.000002342259,0.9776244,0.00009879193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008195997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060967974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.573285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045391404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076787116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9254222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553239706","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00664.x","title":"ELIJAH AND ISHMAEL","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04656544069678336,"score_gpt":0.3466051547816502,"score_spread":0.30003971408486685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553239706","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027019974,0.81038374,0.00003037906,0.082487896,0.00039418665,0.0009744164,0.000006910225,0.00016913108,0.078533374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14982764,0.83993316,0.00076164684,0.0077486853,0.0002607689,0.000042800042,0.000002514799,0.000009259892,0.0014135283],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898386,0.00009202522,0.00017699732,0.00018556342,0.0003094248,0.0002521367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995668,0.000055037446,0.000060263133,0.00010334309,0.00010120137,0.000113385286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052270835,0.00010902181,0.00027047668,0.000009277501,0.0005133366,0.00004365438,0.00014798057,0.000055978115,0.00006562869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037095053,0.00008093355,0.000072661125,0.0001761283,0.0002390366,0.00014547123,0.000056733028,0.00011462858,0.00023163922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009180082,0.00024948842,0.0062345318,0.004157981,0.00027044353,0.000063487474,0.0389517,0.0000056936788,0.0003967209,0.1327551,0.4345751,0.38233054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013979299,0.00001321867,0.015373539,0.0012814167,0.0000428541,8.090253e-7,0.0010854133,1.8080088e-7,0.0000019695922,0.00075761415,0.9811596,0.00014356915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036229764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005440067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5465845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013188699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062441526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54768807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557713239","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01318.x","title":"THE FIFTH WORLD CONGRESS ON FAMILY LAW AND THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"International Human Rights and Reproductive Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Law; Political science; Family law; Psychology; Sociology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.01771482702825411,"score_gpt":0.2937500995630633,"score_spread":0.2760352725348092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557713239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39841375,0.15605874,0.000001513377,0.02466273,0.0030309702,0.0025387574,0.000118257514,0.000045691828,0.4151296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498544,0.04031011,0.00001591897,0.0027073286,0.00042452427,0.000012559838,0.000005146701,0.000006994516,0.0066630677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989239,0.00021505663,0.00020069457,0.0001966697,0.00032756125,0.00013611866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991514,0.0002698326,0.00013750306,0.0002453358,0.00015243521,0.000043493677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014480719,0.00009678522,0.00021438832,0.000015365575,0.0008917066,0.0000747998,0.00027997416,0.000032781296,0.00002731274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005898363,0.000038216396,0.00006168148,0.000077845136,0.0021898865,0.000067535126,0.000043618533,0.00022137295,0.000010414197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011696138,0.000012009022,0.000042219846,0.000016753153,0.000027875722,2.6049295e-7,0.0008626098,3.6561257e-8,0.0000057355746,0.99440783,0.0031940101,0.0014189901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034906698,0.000022105613,0.011031001,0.00060127943,0.000070323316,0.0000013138906,0.0001325047,0.0000011099279,0.000014983191,0.02578695,0.9618795,0.000109888475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037794996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069289594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96862084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000074090076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028054888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8068728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579304025","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01446.x","title":"MARRIAGE: CIVIL, RELIGIOUS, CONTRACTUAL, AND MORE*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marriage law; Law; Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Religious law; Sociology; Judaism; Political science; State (computer science); Public law; Islam; History","score_opus":0.03992372588675457,"score_gpt":0.34675615129486087,"score_spread":0.3068324254081063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579304025","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01859135,0.9246735,0.000009494689,0.022282334,0.0005523072,0.0008983381,0.00001005643,0.00012786136,0.032854747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33172303,0.6606451,0.00019192846,0.0058942954,0.0005001662,0.000053650652,0.000003848495,0.000011101405,0.0009768641],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998332,0.00025011707,0.00027666765,0.00019286935,0.00042922783,0.00051910407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990706,0.00025836332,0.00012365237,0.00016050154,0.00012559588,0.0002613201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013162195,0.0001721927,0.00042913266,0.000013848104,0.0005515004,0.00005552346,0.00018089847,0.000097235694,0.00017244813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009855523,0.00012654655,0.00010098427,0.00017215371,0.00034335206,0.00031458843,0.0000826942,0.0001854301,0.00025890782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003606567,0.00006171591,0.0089674285,0.0006835755,0.000078740755,0.0000049057135,0.015873685,6.256664e-8,0.000060004266,0.0036305322,0.9438106,0.026825175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010756932,0.000009255852,0.03136369,0.00072551356,0.00009224366,0.0000015282839,0.0018135061,4.6547453e-7,0.0000012134375,0.000054359098,0.96564037,0.00019026206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022280074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025950142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3131317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112511116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040621962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5160418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579884250","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2012.01441.x","title":"SAME SEX, DIFFERENT RIGHTS: AMENDING U.S. IMMIGRATION LAW TO RECOGNIZE SAME‐SEX PARTNERS OF REFUGEES AND ASYLEES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Refugee; Persecution; Legislation; Immigration law; Political science; Law; Immigration reform; Population; Refugee law; Sociology; Politics; Demography","score_opus":0.03907273651068179,"score_gpt":0.35761914716710147,"score_spread":0.3185464106564197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579884250","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42364007,0.47440672,0.00022894096,0.007794132,0.0015466951,0.0027221886,0.000054264274,0.00020638041,0.089400604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562988,0.04024248,0.00012431723,0.0018003219,0.0005246517,0.000059102542,0.000008348483,0.000012757264,0.0009291901],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981366,0.00029948325,0.0004878173,0.00023638557,0.0004564395,0.0003832873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906707,0.00016927582,0.00023776722,0.00016415562,0.00011026687,0.00025147066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013157373,0.00017702175,0.00060100993,0.00004400524,0.00035424015,0.000069070426,0.00016935854,0.000093818904,0.000067787456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017746128,0.00013115216,0.00008766627,0.00026989987,0.00014773845,0.00039939448,0.000049804738,0.00011139277,0.000039463972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007302632,0.00086929905,0.052177906,0.015325177,0.0005314328,0.000008976213,0.077412814,0.000002024884,0.0046442463,0.32166344,0.16986264,0.357429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095102005,0.0000614604,0.0020855889,0.0033489966,0.000090621405,8.100242e-7,0.001326293,8.2248613e-7,0.00029412966,0.0010325961,0.99142313,0.00024045438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013572968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044564107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8215605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008708701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004642867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99299574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582480376","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01319.x","title":"TOWARD THE DIFFERENTIATION OF HIGH‐CONFLICT FAMILIES: AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND CANADIAN CASE LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child and Adolescent Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Alienation; Economic Justice; Identification (biology); Law; Social conflict; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.16161973708148575,"score_gpt":0.4801000534582291,"score_spread":0.31848031637674334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582480376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869555,0.004633106,0.000005245973,0.0051116156,0.00022724335,0.000917111,0.00016177706,0.000009802723,0.0019785534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98615044,0.011047472,0.000022435108,0.0025828972,0.000116241805,0.000008259841,0.000030088728,0.000007648576,0.000034486075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773955,0.00054748944,0.0005440616,0.0002576053,0.0004706923,0.00044057882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980717,0.00029707063,0.00022170457,0.00043661956,0.00070590636,0.00026705605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004372531,0.00009690464,0.0004814557,0.00033070942,0.0012904148,0.000012106911,0.0003072058,0.00009764484,0.00012081127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002315705,0.00006364122,0.00006746905,0.0014736342,0.00068419887,0.000120895485,0.00008697815,0.000771342,0.000006060106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058311012,0.0005669283,0.09263617,0.024112225,0.00048611558,0.0000613338,0.072397105,0.0000014491453,0.0056502996,0.72826046,0.012262887,0.06350674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003177107,0.000087469416,0.9421119,0.0016764777,0.0004828937,0.00000553619,0.008252556,0.00022575627,0.000017359718,0.00022119166,0.046447884,0.00015325738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2613402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30368337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84947574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009156581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00116394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604588040","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12050","title":"Family Life, Parental Separation, and Child Custody in Canada: a Focus on Quebec","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Child custody; Family law; Context (archaeology); Dispute resolution; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Criminology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.019373300075626508,"score_gpt":0.2777592548116963,"score_spread":0.2583859547360698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604588040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4896541,0.2894822,0.00003760499,0.050453085,0.0011281477,0.0035641764,0.000051314168,0.00008830986,0.16554107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9052508,0.08791381,0.000037927784,0.0058519254,0.00008959235,0.000102644546,0.000018508967,0.0000128701495,0.0007219082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983104,0.00027081755,0.00039833816,0.0002741645,0.00042437718,0.0003219049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992275,0.00015013035,0.00011468386,0.00019227686,0.00009169897,0.00022368085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047523718,0.00016327437,0.00033000845,0.000062096806,0.0003489974,0.00007031386,0.00018677872,0.00008874898,0.00006907355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019686783,0.00013950882,0.000052118838,0.0003732627,0.00009504773,0.00018456922,0.000032700962,0.00029056738,0.00013005936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012944941,0.00026740355,0.21288809,0.00095253467,0.000102567144,0.000037807717,0.0028392414,0.00019014285,0.000021838581,0.09470392,0.5976028,0.09038072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024169583,0.000021274835,0.8130109,0.002061791,0.000028393793,0.0000010632051,0.0018758397,0.0004326245,1.15778676e-7,0.00052442454,0.18150912,0.0002927709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98433274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6001228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005532155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017354867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5689004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1784500953","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00632.x","title":"CRITICAL ASPECTS OF PARENTING PLANS FOR YOUNG CHILDREN","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Developmental psychology; Schedule","score_opus":0.039468604095096504,"score_gpt":0.34500906634214906,"score_spread":0.30554046224705256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1784500953","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13346937,0.46669805,0.027356058,0.03582767,0.004071576,0.0068702744,0.0006028124,0.00040513137,0.32469907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954181,0.04307564,0.001854326,0.0005271126,0.00018434422,0.000036761587,0.000034201752,0.000013164,0.00009345839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989383,0.00007462116,0.0003062798,0.00016241829,0.00026951483,0.00024885288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930656,0.0002158723,0.00008833267,0.0001408005,0.00016817973,0.0000802823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008674528,0.00008592147,0.00025200436,0.00003240308,0.00032640013,0.000026265443,0.00019293421,0.00008104784,0.000014238241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010137687,0.00007635393,0.00014814534,0.0002034686,0.00015871112,0.00009513141,0.000020387823,0.000117563744,0.000019044104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022028141,0.000094402814,0.010086569,0.00077784486,0.0000362289,0.0000017315602,0.00080105773,0.000029609855,0.000031921525,0.9816666,0.002730957,0.0037408415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020895144,0.00032543295,0.5701031,0.030969625,0.0011582745,0.000021312702,0.0032884986,0.00024578098,0.000023716897,0.20093732,0.18932374,0.0015137127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005636165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051956996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8207116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059275928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023118114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31136227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1788428164","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00635.x","title":"PARENT EDUCATION AFTER SEPARATION/DIVORCE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Separation (statistics); Developmental psychology; Parent education; Social psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.03450573828765361,"score_gpt":0.37235365306068247,"score_spread":0.33784791477302883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1788428164","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069553964,0.6485233,0.0025163281,0.046909887,0.0034124309,0.0023591695,0.000020181791,0.00024157081,0.22646321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7155684,0.26888254,0.0011555415,0.008922366,0.00037410564,0.0002425554,0.000047871108,0.000016120399,0.00479047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890226,0.00013241527,0.00025769198,0.00018578421,0.00032799575,0.00019385692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993908,0.00003675037,0.00008651769,0.00020905465,0.00016281655,0.000114104725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000575826,0.000100221754,0.00016087678,0.000040314873,0.00032083775,0.000055807373,0.00015882081,0.00008305622,0.00011680953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011958991,0.00008789632,0.000097497796,0.00032327767,0.00009016006,0.00016725739,0.00001876871,0.00013848502,0.0006444178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014547939,0.0009040133,0.020439198,0.0018828062,0.00009274005,0.000013789998,0.010585856,0.00045523915,0.000044077657,0.6600401,0.1764242,0.1291034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008944351,0.0000132368805,0.036096483,0.0021481928,0.000055306184,0.0000010072437,0.0005395631,0.000009774579,2.1365074e-7,0.0058764676,0.9549934,0.00017688966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069972913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006608749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7785692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021257543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085139676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8282902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1814157025","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00667.x","title":"THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Seriousness; Legislature; Political science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Criticism; Psychology","score_opus":0.06187454347855731,"score_gpt":0.35745765721547534,"score_spread":0.29558311373691804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1814157025","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07778043,0.7209408,0.0034789816,0.02312424,0.0033773524,0.0011160348,0.000018441498,0.00030970466,0.16985402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28746,0.7059094,0.00014211581,0.0047495076,0.0005973551,0.000029312469,0.0000057066836,0.000011386437,0.0010952341],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987011,0.00015798151,0.00023774878,0.00017664967,0.0004267184,0.0002998285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916154,0.00016510101,0.000095388314,0.00027823838,0.00019095492,0.00010879485],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010865795,0.00010448523,0.00019230942,0.00002802869,0.001513746,0.00011531181,0.00036301103,0.000043779008,0.00006910669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056066236,0.000071006245,0.00019731511,0.00051950547,0.00016584249,0.00011256041,0.000030970547,0.00017427331,0.00041037335],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019575138,0.00017406407,0.000056808105,0.0017593798,0.00012263781,0.000031133946,0.045543935,0.000067299094,0.000019521458,0.029303027,0.019596696,0.90330595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079362995,0.00003187211,0.00020533451,0.0011278609,0.0055157067,0.0000028724237,0.38930467,0.0000036538743,0.0000016688048,0.00013704032,0.6034275,0.00016243986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066315015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043280087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90314347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013522255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032329847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868345552","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2000.tb00553.x","title":"THE SECOND ANNUAL MEYER ELKIN ADDRESS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Honor; Queen (butterfly); Conciliation; Wright; Law; Management; Sociology; Library science; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.03615540671168817,"score_gpt":0.3405818266283443,"score_spread":0.30442641991665614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868345552","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014602433,0.62308353,6.43936e-7,0.034164287,0.00047630625,0.0010863693,0.000057020636,0.00012907569,0.32640037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035679154,0.814862,0.00007119812,0.008923422,0.00073773,0.00015920926,0.0000059760932,0.000018409906,0.1395429],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980789,0.00043322527,0.00029650118,0.00022265929,0.00052550767,0.0004432004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910796,0.00029608724,0.00008323398,0.00022146093,0.00017423883,0.00011701814],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012169698,0.00015531738,0.0003107119,0.000006177472,0.0016026424,0.00009088267,0.00048564532,0.00007498052,0.0042614606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025484912,0.000089524176,0.00016470025,0.00024141089,0.0003899632,0.00019399068,0.000047556576,0.0002128034,0.0014303607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034798063,0.00001887565,0.00011149885,0.00015496864,0.000049183924,0.0000042628703,0.0043843715,2.9004727e-7,0.0000051682878,0.0014821431,0.8055025,0.1882833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073138806,0.000010583303,0.0062875138,0.00042294612,0.000032499935,4.913264e-7,0.001885526,5.6268556e-7,0.0000013935208,0.00007747221,0.9910617,0.00014615833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011473813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027730495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1917785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117584386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006873812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1894907231","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12081","title":"A Presumption Against Shared Parenting for Family Court Litigants","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Coaching; Presumption; Compromise; Psychological intervention; Domestic violence; Adversarial system; SAFER; Social psychology; Criminology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.06379233560967743,"score_gpt":0.36209997075991723,"score_spread":0.29830763515023984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1894907231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037055064,0.26383644,0.023171004,0.0055612545,0.0056676627,0.010623163,0.00048118283,0.0014237162,0.6521805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6656086,0.30612993,0.0036401718,0.019271642,0.0016831793,0.0009373567,0.0003013628,0.00010017673,0.0023276052],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969946,0.00043049653,0.00063914515,0.00052871846,0.0006338007,0.0007731969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982672,0.00036519876,0.00028375795,0.00042706152,0.00042896162,0.00022787057],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033636477,0.0002749689,0.0005901572,0.0000648712,0.000749474,0.00017196742,0.00058988057,0.00017793966,0.00006471954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00107898,0.00025916263,0.00029014665,0.0003029903,0.0001708232,0.00036737358,0.00007517211,0.00022174427,0.0004207558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004623261,0.0002631366,0.0039460054,0.006494885,0.00011632169,0.000006601233,0.0029434145,0.000027649428,0.002410784,0.025092222,0.5901903,0.36846247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037980717,0.00005368851,0.028739726,0.00798047,0.00011704936,5.1464673e-7,0.0004570768,0.0012811708,0.000013283363,0.000543826,0.95998114,0.00045225568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023714144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026025564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64985293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011561602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018956566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897283657","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00883.x","title":"FAMILY/CHILD JUDICIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION (JDR)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Family court; Dispute resolution; Law; Welfare; Political science; Family law; Alternative dispute resolution; Resolution (logic); Best interests; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.04793670436161205,"score_gpt":0.3351885406590122,"score_spread":0.28725183629740014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897283657","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039979517,0.5580346,0.00017206935,0.016820788,0.0015484608,0.0014930471,0.000019084904,0.00025632125,0.41765767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1418539,0.8391769,0.0015631245,0.012590306,0.0010991793,0.00017908597,0.000021434787,0.000039604016,0.0034764796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970091,0.0007630679,0.00045514922,0.00038964095,0.0007780678,0.00060496235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899745,0.00013503701,0.00018636079,0.0002574396,0.00022945303,0.0001942848],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015901207,0.00024277583,0.0005332448,0.000027241846,0.001517669,0.00006887943,0.0003268447,0.00014399523,0.00010969044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013783776,0.00019575944,0.0002588038,0.0005379042,0.00035235815,0.00024717973,0.000062214815,0.0003155875,0.00052074186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010532261,0.00017707872,0.0017762562,0.0008537016,0.00015754285,0.000022812392,0.0047476836,0.000005873558,0.000105957406,0.089382984,0.8512679,0.051491678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015529907,0.00002204631,0.012979027,0.0014652612,0.0000990015,0.0000010277606,0.0007507867,0.0000029332764,0.000002062502,0.00028920788,0.9839579,0.00027547654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038152027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008958123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41418117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033845517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012561867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1898085152","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01358.x","title":"PARENT EDUCATION PROGRAMS IN FAMILY COURTS: BALANCING AUTONOMY AND STATE INTERVENTION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Autonomy; Intervention (counseling); State (computer science); Psychology; Child custody; Work (physics); Medical education; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Medicine; Criminology; Computer science; Psychiatry; Engineering","score_opus":0.0942847539749596,"score_gpt":0.32952984793602824,"score_spread":0.23524509396106863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1898085152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6870906,0.25885585,0.00084095687,0.0013790794,0.00147711,0.0026794358,0.000007375731,0.0001508164,0.047518812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85402703,0.14265472,0.0012069098,0.00076122896,0.00006163612,0.00022119962,0.000041661802,0.000017967453,0.0010076601],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984745,0.00030793145,0.00046154257,0.00025883588,0.00022647758,0.00027071772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937004,0.000036412177,0.00018339237,0.00016849276,0.00012383463,0.000117851996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016232595,0.00013396457,0.0002547323,0.00009013836,0.0001824544,0.000058727925,0.00016144116,0.00007812999,0.000023771416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000914648,0.0001228078,0.00008146437,0.00028894856,0.00011922081,0.00024120467,0.000041474337,0.00020515194,0.00003560726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006665898,0.0005187483,0.2120206,0.0011882815,0.00003024258,0.000005078415,0.012621337,0.0000018983022,0.000008942409,0.01612654,0.0025484422,0.7549232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003241181,0.00008760749,0.68157065,0.0113908,0.00008036417,0.000001975337,0.0074239518,0.00036865007,2.0964488e-7,0.006531842,0.29181907,0.00040074607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049457853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016570254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7545225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024271598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004658678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7476581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915731202","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01325.x","title":"NEGLECTED INFANTS IN FAMILY COURT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"South Health Campus; Alberta Health Services","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Intervention (counseling); Child neglect; Psychology; Mental health; Best interests; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry; Child abuse; Medicine; Political science; Law; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.028130683886326953,"score_gpt":0.32577727808352647,"score_spread":0.2976465941971995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915731202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62494993,0.20569085,0.000019070094,0.004038543,0.003073151,0.0013175705,0.000037109905,0.00022511193,0.16064869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8639574,0.104505405,0.00036588358,0.027656507,0.0006445496,0.00023663549,0.00008208418,0.000108034925,0.0024434743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997822,0.00018384859,0.0006452714,0.0005259991,0.0002797103,0.0005432033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984614,0.00017475363,0.00014853178,0.000955235,0.00010054904,0.00015948781],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043725382,0.00030556603,0.0006705429,0.0001421953,0.00006407874,0.000029093413,0.00046751555,0.00026653157,0.0028395967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001340086,0.00026948942,0.00017639346,0.00063031114,0.000076205026,0.000104529856,0.00005941373,0.0010861753,0.004767955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054363147,0.0005975284,0.013689528,0.0006244636,0.00014812963,0.0003049965,0.0006957282,4.4805194e-7,0.004608952,0.002805412,0.7293675,0.24710298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065063545,0.00003565144,0.4829653,0.0013023854,0.000046928864,0.00002970633,0.00002823771,0.0000040298605,0.0000051754237,0.00007882302,0.51462924,0.00022390485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040893297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041237846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46927574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027735141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008430603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964254585","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00044.x","title":"ADOLESCENTS’ VIEWS ON THE FAIRNESS OF PARENTING AND FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS AFTER SEPARATION","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Separation (statistics); Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Demographic economics; Developmental psychology; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.05105035142021946,"score_gpt":0.33546914154154006,"score_spread":0.2844187901213206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964254585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7550095,0.19344172,0.0007957614,0.01593586,0.0008493544,0.0027875998,0.000028914312,0.00005484929,0.031096466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94088686,0.055938926,0.00007780253,0.0026010745,0.00013912522,0.000046324687,0.000003832922,0.000005482519,0.0003005908],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893206,0.00023803677,0.00027185708,0.00013429427,0.00028006252,0.00014368813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955285,0.000061301194,0.00013600309,0.00013982093,0.00007265938,0.000037349113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001076984,0.00008495407,0.00017331769,0.000024043671,0.00024915297,0.000025841582,0.00012146126,0.000054128035,0.00003594221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016401848,0.00005694424,0.00006731928,0.0001798968,0.00009545137,0.00008966037,0.000024464798,0.00012217442,0.000047274276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007785105,0.0007242279,0.20204097,0.004873189,0.00008873431,0.000006159683,0.0199749,0.00007754021,0.00018846086,0.09254765,0.09949742,0.5799029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015729191,0.000021371643,0.2792714,0.006634521,0.00006922003,1.990234e-7,0.00037999603,0.00020468408,0.0000017260479,0.00032730115,0.71277297,0.0001593576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058831116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003949253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6132755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033811328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052965763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23221187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964793103","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00218.x","title":"DIVORCE AND THE FAMILY COURT: WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.038460929768102746,"score_gpt":0.32735764048435173,"score_spread":0.288896710716249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964793103","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028253091,0.909974,0.00016816122,0.009311535,0.0011916296,0.001879437,0.000031695225,0.00018088233,0.049009565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30105427,0.68091524,0.00008982522,0.01700096,0.00020255387,0.000114836126,0.000008203009,0.000019974414,0.0005941773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963089,0.00081932265,0.0006177077,0.000529172,0.00096716493,0.0007577292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978651,0.0006976692,0.00023718768,0.0005952065,0.00030669823,0.00029816965],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026468416,0.0003596098,0.00081795274,0.00006003247,0.0015983828,0.00022915864,0.00079650996,0.00016674762,0.00008778127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050239044,0.00024505533,0.00021951886,0.0005835194,0.0023496696,0.00048919243,0.00015911288,0.00047408583,0.00020050986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027573018,0.0005584237,0.0067549786,0.005399551,0.00047297697,0.00077918585,0.05538715,0.000036329486,0.00045259314,0.16388461,0.39511782,0.37088066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021564655,0.00012438175,0.08080468,0.02885733,0.0005639728,0.00012238929,0.01069117,0.00018680036,0.000008309889,0.0027942292,0.8723423,0.0013479744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039008653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001317387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4772245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109141874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041641569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965852444","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00139.x","title":"ROCK‐PAPER‐SCISSORS: PLAYING THE ODDS WITH THE LAW OF CHILD RELOCATION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Settlement (finance); Jurisdiction; Law; Adversarial system; Odds; Duty; Process (computing); Proposition; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.021213584404343063,"score_gpt":0.3040934368450104,"score_spread":0.2828798524406673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965852444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009577958,0.22727405,0.0023100693,0.15047804,0.0004145496,0.0018037873,0.0000046592045,0.00010742093,0.6080295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92067754,0.06741609,0.0000342005,0.011095611,0.00031243783,0.000018495646,0.0000030408291,0.000009930941,0.00043262856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880296,0.0001480279,0.00024644088,0.00012837465,0.00047820932,0.00019596684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991314,0.0002126333,0.00018327289,0.00027683866,0.0001516478,0.00004423656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003067722,0.00008665486,0.00016972524,0.0000148426725,0.00093152234,0.00003375858,0.00029869,0.000047931415,0.00006233109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007058189,0.00004326626,0.000075941774,0.00038636487,0.0001683764,0.00013956754,0.000023901777,0.00016407382,0.000024018747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074665375,0.00017139208,0.0011388346,0.0009854577,0.00016896226,0.0000067480332,0.02739344,0.000038453283,0.00032496607,0.64706653,0.060436588,0.26219398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006633283,0.0000307223,0.008466305,0.0012201379,0.0000663278,0.0000018351943,0.0013010303,0.0000064716774,0.000010229459,0.00004447472,0.9887173,0.000068840214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021338395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003230758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9282807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040195075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006729781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7164611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972185549","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01278.x","title":"WHERE IS THE JUSTICE? PARENTAL EXPERIENCES OF THE CANADIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CASES OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE*","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Child sexual abuse; CITES; Criminology; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Sexual assault; Restorative justice; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Political science; Medicine; Law; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03433389715955994,"score_gpt":0.3123407924780015,"score_spread":0.2780068953184416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972185549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6016294,0.36372316,6.987582e-7,0.002660454,0.0011446597,0.00089225604,0.000059058228,0.000013437761,0.02987693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835838,0.010829501,0.0000043477166,0.0053087524,0.000114491384,0.000035811958,0.0000030529384,0.000009191048,0.0001110333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985175,0.00021137077,0.0005133488,0.0002416068,0.00024342527,0.00027276372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988381,0.00016146073,0.00022041859,0.00064404396,0.00005860868,0.0000773141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003263074,0.00016682969,0.0004083572,0.00004675021,0.00016973235,0.0000124554645,0.00052659085,0.000079857964,0.00030211965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044061006,0.00009467923,0.000113633214,0.0003816437,0.00012559623,0.000044245382,0.000016300017,0.0002269441,0.0000503235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009868323,0.0009078733,0.014439186,0.026878413,0.0004087869,0.00040663124,0.33277285,0.000024036492,0.00003719062,0.018419543,0.54184455,0.06376226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012550195,0.00044968177,0.31047693,0.03615484,0.003171613,0.0007549499,0.376739,0.00002873602,0.000048451795,0.000011731318,0.27023998,0.0006690648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029169638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08891809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38195446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006238733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011540013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9772952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977315401","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00663.x","title":"IS THE TURN TOWARD COLLABORATIVE LAW A TURN AWAY FROM JUSTICE?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law and economics; Law; Individualism; Private law; Power (physics); Sociology; Public law; Political science","score_opus":0.04771668560999327,"score_gpt":0.3491699588710791,"score_spread":0.30145327326108584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977315401","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007223937,0.49925616,0.0003513689,0.23394316,0.00200194,0.0019764549,0.00024469604,0.00019818099,0.2548041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37268916,0.55391943,0.00041222034,0.0698585,0.0015877222,0.00011521287,0.000025350755,0.000027454767,0.0013649553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839485,0.00023603803,0.00029531584,0.00025854976,0.0005389312,0.0002763384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989679,0.0001683924,0.00016261498,0.0002963006,0.0002833579,0.00012146269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079341204,0.00015361552,0.00031817902,0.000014927333,0.00066425884,0.00013669515,0.00036015498,0.00009782918,0.00041361988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000147623,0.000103734084,0.00014950009,0.00049008476,0.00026588023,0.00019423805,0.00004574863,0.00022088853,0.00038828998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004224303,0.0003001426,0.00024241637,0.0011161523,0.00036803435,0.0000581448,0.1557738,0.000012411303,0.00031058048,0.4036861,0.345677,0.09241299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018827045,0.000029797471,0.0010302112,0.0012333223,0.00026005026,4.965285e-7,0.0029677136,0.0000016810347,0.000015390106,0.0025122685,0.9916158,0.00014500864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0111981835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029804807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6459388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014505441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040255507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99538636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982245255","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.00242.x","title":"BUILDING A CHILD PROTECTION MEDIATION PROGRAM IN BRITISH COLUMBIA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Welfare; Child protection; Process (computing); Welfare system; Scale (ratio); Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.0330844601367085,"score_gpt":0.3062229980821771,"score_spread":0.2731385379454686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982245255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80025905,0.18690804,0.00009925604,0.00077411416,0.0006238155,0.0031530655,0.000015433046,0.0002461616,0.007921036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8896886,0.104541324,0.00082736905,0.0024162307,0.0005213241,0.0015299261,0.000057183257,0.00004307212,0.00037497774],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873817,0.00013318812,0.000370568,0.0003396616,0.0001823772,0.00023600983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995119,0.000025694611,0.00011356774,0.00025050464,0.000042453616,0.00005588489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002445851,0.00009247977,0.00030828468,0.00003264057,0.00011537866,0.00004603011,0.00012239972,0.00010277026,0.00070112775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055885608,0.00014010642,0.000094259616,0.0003945234,0.00003364881,0.000093201495,0.000017807115,0.00030309285,0.0002701495],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004162253,0.00039788568,0.016106334,0.00027094662,0.000037636444,0.00015116417,0.0001966959,3.9971755e-7,0.000015249212,0.000024290986,0.041387662,0.94140756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005028405,0.00006337961,0.71770716,0.0031592115,0.000022536333,0.00013093904,0.000013408622,0.000007838343,7.1947846e-7,0.00006550947,0.2781823,0.00014418497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021389617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01768609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9412634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051179006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024729216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999389045","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00666.x","title":"JUDICIAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Welfare; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06960463949241635,"score_gpt":0.41601493926083655,"score_spread":0.3464102997684202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999389045","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009116761,0.054944392,0.0013032301,0.5059938,0.001678738,0.00058596523,0.0000063104735,0.00014091586,0.43443498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37220168,0.48923546,0.0053279633,0.12140369,0.0032452096,0.00018325748,0.000085011845,0.000034412446,0.008283309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990668,0.00014077658,0.00020967095,0.000121586105,0.00029288905,0.00016827481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941856,0.00006409921,0.00010502454,0.00014833368,0.00019054172,0.00007346621],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010581365,0.000058802467,0.00011517684,0.0000342181,0.00044654592,0.00006633109,0.00014773404,0.000048328922,0.00033722512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010578037,0.000056235443,0.00005165187,0.0006505226,0.000087723936,0.0004383508,0.000012769565,0.00020966952,0.00089671405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002307438,0.00009872312,0.0000821755,0.00011762026,0.000011110205,0.0000022138624,0.0020820228,0.000004984838,0.000026402142,0.59714586,0.36885238,0.031574175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006824966,0.000008068432,0.0019171449,0.0005011409,0.000025022224,7.1449057e-7,0.00025543827,4.5642815e-7,9.610835e-7,0.0030725538,0.9940766,0.00007363686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045731217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000691339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62522423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016756612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010610708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013378714","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00179_1.x","title":"JANUARY 2008","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Harm; Government (linguistics); Psychology; Family law; Psychoanalytic theory; Corporal punishment; Child protection; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04003741118325386,"score_gpt":0.3464462065810253,"score_spread":0.30640879539777144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013378714","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058852695,0.62121665,0.00031119556,0.0015225022,0.00088172127,0.00037853417,0.0000058398145,0.0000875852,0.36971068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19007097,0.6339802,0.0013050635,0.12893224,0.0025262272,0.00010479856,0.00010426338,0.00013368372,0.04284253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988591,0.000052012878,0.00034218258,0.00026028597,0.00015818483,0.00032820087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999182,0.00009216508,0.000073352196,0.00050548813,0.00004140673,0.00010558318],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070279883,0.00014090043,0.0002937552,0.000045724984,0.000050668423,0.00000714581,0.0002000758,0.00007753806,0.0027288292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020514775,0.000117905554,0.00014618687,0.00020258187,0.00003372842,0.000041703883,0.000023885183,0.00021105525,0.010734614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007431685,0.000082291255,0.0012633158,0.00017814817,0.000043319662,0.00013083972,0.00009180449,2.1939448e-8,0.00001272649,0.0018210601,0.83270556,0.16366348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002099045,0.000028612452,0.1475124,0.00092578656,0.000050607305,0.00004648771,0.000030201887,1.01242044e-7,0.0000041982485,0.00006777089,0.85099834,0.0001255941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000563821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001886335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32686818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018161045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017061093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99818283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014229464","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01287.x","title":"CHILDREN RESISTING POSTSEPARATION CONTACT WITH A PARENT: CONCEPTS, CONTROVERSIES, AND CONUNDRUMS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Resistance (ecology); Social psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.01342374486595975,"score_gpt":0.3110076863260546,"score_spread":0.2975839414600948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014229464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7872726,0.13516897,0.0001360911,0.02581499,0.00064107386,0.003026065,0.000076399956,0.00025790153,0.04760595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94923776,0.04645438,0.00015521616,0.0034732798,0.00035719454,0.000016759093,0.000058731912,0.00001012849,0.00023656878],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989273,0.00013463362,0.00020650549,0.00023063441,0.0002803947,0.00022053487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923784,0.00019143328,0.00016016193,0.000159776,0.00012947574,0.00012130149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006411214,0.00012495126,0.0002772797,0.00002183608,0.00051559496,0.000094801246,0.00011658191,0.00007324486,0.00008089551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033811032,0.00010176303,0.000046952977,0.0001369396,0.00017160986,0.00022843172,0.000020751324,0.00020882308,0.000022817627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020803594,0.00027585085,0.3305241,0.0012487492,0.00037659466,0.00004031777,0.006753388,0.000001784657,0.003486319,0.24105352,0.17004654,0.2459848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006691506,0.00009848864,0.27235973,0.001563913,0.00014781054,0.000011743013,0.00041201588,0.000005562846,0.0000053332387,0.00009666505,0.7243646,0.0002650169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001618473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022156336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.554318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031477055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001438506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41497758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018000587","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00909.x","title":"LESSONS LEARNED FROM A CHILD PROTECTION MEDIATION PROGRAM: If At First You Succeed and Then You Don't…","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Thriving; Political science; Psychology; Family mediation; Child protection; Public relations; Law; Alternative dispute resolution","score_opus":0.0593212203700322,"score_gpt":0.32274859335616657,"score_spread":0.2634273729861344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018000587","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22708416,0.36588636,0.00045094374,0.31178975,0.0016647998,0.01291574,0.000115481685,0.0010853081,0.07900746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4987783,0.49764854,0.0003225072,0.001394359,0.00049354904,0.00038776698,0.00012789547,0.000029867439,0.00081719283],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983968,0.00033284625,0.00026636565,0.00035998394,0.00038507822,0.00025889394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934953,0.000053832075,0.00018108677,0.00020805655,0.000086013766,0.000121452846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009826449,0.00015601535,0.00028173477,0.000036281526,0.0008582089,0.00009346166,0.0001209347,0.00013139477,0.0002022533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044100033,0.00013491251,0.00009856753,0.00032740383,0.000102458784,0.0002149639,0.000030107582,0.0001861125,0.00008034785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028110191,0.00031112562,0.005873887,0.00078068505,0.00009429946,0.000005686584,0.0072058537,0.0000041666485,0.00013071368,0.007956099,0.009773606,0.9678358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002547109,0.000043235264,0.020446133,0.0010053932,0.000081479986,0.0000016851468,0.00040144162,0.000013940661,0.0000088329725,0.0007147073,0.9768459,0.00018254227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026028734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020090237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014087422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065685905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6600736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018036763","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00141.x","title":"ASSESSING THE PARENT–CHILD RELATIONSHIP IN PARENTING CAPACITY EVALUATIONS: CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF ATTACHMENT RESEARCH","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.4869531592217185,"score_gpt":0.592706808589885,"score_spread":0.1057536493681665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018036763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50286937,0.32940096,0.007941676,0.00845161,0.000800699,0.006077958,0.00002174857,0.00008860495,0.14434737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98946404,0.008832833,0.00036444308,0.000698394,0.0002217165,0.00029562213,0.000028306262,0.000015218996,0.000079428726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570227,0.0015867454,0.0013680783,0.00038223426,0.00058311387,0.00037753241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995037,0.0034826167,0.0003124996,0.00083420926,0.0002615652,0.00007211576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021798845,0.00012256412,0.00035060762,0.00015040294,0.00032307833,0.00003424612,0.00036641388,0.00011579088,0.00019902666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008360591,0.000091998794,0.00016393291,0.001116873,0.00020945017,0.000106418964,0.00006546309,0.0010040335,0.00026552146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006963003,0.000675825,0.75571096,0.00042332665,0.00006467842,0.0000032448806,0.00072606234,0.0000045444804,0.00000427455,0.017746078,0.00945229,0.21518174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028748738,0.000020842675,0.9281385,0.0024329573,0.000068470894,0.000005017414,0.0007856828,0.000009433316,0.000001188047,0.00081436476,0.06735087,0.00008517438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014398996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014982886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48659465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007796417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008493037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75550884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021215546","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00079.x","title":"THE EVOLUTION—OR END—OF MARRIAGE?: REFLECTIONS ON THE IMPASSE OVER SAME‐SEX MARRIAGE","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Emblem; Appeal; Lesbian; Institution; Complementarity (molecular biology); Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Gender studies; History","score_opus":0.05775052486679768,"score_gpt":0.372234977833448,"score_spread":0.31448445296665034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021215546","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048890285,0.6262968,0.00029883746,0.1800644,0.0013941868,0.006256311,0.00007344865,0.00054450135,0.13618122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6894626,0.28282008,0.00051064644,0.009071488,0.00093591743,0.0007187568,0.000024326118,0.000058762173,0.016397383],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820626,0.0001897028,0.00054710114,0.00032802828,0.00038905407,0.0003398479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977134,0.0005595721,0.00024510274,0.0012497145,0.0001759709,0.000056227094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012739068,0.00019361323,0.00045192006,0.000067245375,0.0003589034,0.000015678535,0.00024341323,0.00009972454,0.00018662745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016661354,0.00008575847,0.00019089394,0.00058851787,0.0002789698,0.00004383927,0.000060403305,0.0004579378,0.00009842268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019016201,0.00027269815,0.0025565885,0.0021279051,0.00011510326,0.000026008664,0.000028882194,0.0000017821513,0.0020999904,0.08358894,0.86695325,0.042038687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029668305,0.00035468693,0.08648305,0.0020043792,0.00015565695,0.000046472815,0.00018630463,0.0000051799157,0.00018931228,0.004886185,0.9052752,0.0001168976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000446162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008221435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64057237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022103231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031890403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34971288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039814287","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00063.x","title":"THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD AND THE NEED FOR ITS INCORPORATION INTO A BILL OF RIGHTS","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"International Human Rights and Reproductive Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Law; Bill of rights; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Human rights; Democracy; International human rights law; Perspective (graphical); Politics","score_opus":0.02398354852020967,"score_gpt":0.2953001855528089,"score_spread":0.27131663703259923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039814287","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11535609,0.06095734,0.00029701894,0.5612394,0.0023161292,0.014705806,0.00010820783,0.00005612587,0.2449639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896482,0.005454348,0.000015628324,0.0005787781,0.00024618578,0.000102069025,0.000014658298,0.0000045987354,0.003935527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862236,0.00048392802,0.00032144095,0.00012308515,0.0003659947,0.000083166706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981159,0.0006310182,0.0004083418,0.00022146288,0.0006123614,0.000010918886],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017833101,0.00007779018,0.00014637543,0.00006317364,0.0019105881,0.000034135315,0.00030946755,0.00003526021,0.0000125080915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020652913,0.000021988515,0.000128808,0.00054382964,0.0008051421,0.00006926894,0.000024216855,0.00009048216,0.0000028780976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012302654,0.000027332291,0.000004659866,0.000037242742,0.000021827407,2.1035587e-8,0.00042682467,0.000005157957,0.000017456288,0.9930269,0.0063451664,0.00007510257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001960693,0.000018531775,0.00067654654,0.00060804974,0.000053191885,2.900528e-7,0.000084889914,0.000063250256,0.00016493573,0.28996876,0.7081267,0.00003878045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005845506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071135364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87429214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029739811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004252941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040194546","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00117.x","title":"DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, DOVE, AND DIVORCE MEDIATION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dove; Categorical variable; Mediation; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Mental health; Domestic violence; Risk assessment; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Clinical psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Environmental health; Psychiatry; Computer science; Computer security; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.01638917466527218,"score_gpt":0.3241922748868361,"score_spread":0.30780310022156393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040194546","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0145491185,0.51666003,0.0011714513,0.0014114423,0.00083764736,0.0011319433,0.00001869348,0.00023593122,0.4639837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5771757,0.41928267,0.00032175847,0.0023261972,0.00032563368,0.00004823855,0.00001568387,0.000010922574,0.0004932301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856496,0.00017692748,0.0002925547,0.00024812977,0.0004065096,0.0003109482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936455,0.0001484097,0.00010514002,0.00017112441,0.00011791621,0.000092881004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009740586,0.00013013028,0.00026387436,0.00004162665,0.00031749147,0.00005889516,0.00019646488,0.00007566392,0.00008150033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017793266,0.000113616334,0.000057640744,0.00031806537,0.0002251967,0.0001870348,0.000038450078,0.00011453835,0.0002467092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014186847,0.00022531154,0.030296823,0.0034957228,0.000036742793,0.000061158455,0.0009827459,0.000019811927,0.00057616766,0.4393227,0.16061653,0.3643521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032541124,0.000048919417,0.23131295,0.0068068583,0.0001427796,0.00000678001,0.0003275406,0.000175756,0.00000927987,0.013074704,0.7471752,0.0005938364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013067895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054328975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58655864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050425133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008110427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46331394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046702320","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00910.x","title":"PEDOPHILIA","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Pedophilia; Recidivism; Psychology; Stigma (botany); Social psychology; Criminology; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychiatry; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.04743541708443172,"score_gpt":0.3513225511738332,"score_spread":0.3038871340894015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046702320","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021202574,0.39285564,0.00020221081,0.0014460777,0.097948484,0.00065455266,0.0000144820315,0.00017621534,0.50458205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4766606,0.25852713,0.009660519,0.16351832,0.010881934,0.0014107388,0.00018897394,0.0008940181,0.07825775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973815,0.00040410226,0.0006223991,0.0006201309,0.00034408117,0.00062778767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822134,0.00011123685,0.00022164133,0.0011398935,0.00007860567,0.00022727471],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010003579,0.00034815219,0.0006173874,0.00009538886,0.0001066732,0.000023312206,0.000402802,0.0001420211,0.0037037034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017318422,0.00031354552,0.00024059296,0.0005174783,0.00008720387,0.00008695556,0.000028418162,0.00038338397,0.009013316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007004317,0.0001245199,0.0008446825,0.00033310833,0.00006536781,0.00003706137,0.0001066408,1.2715236e-7,0.00005352963,0.02734507,0.9558141,0.015268737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045081534,0.000109525005,0.0073402985,0.0013368371,0.00010719,0.00013842639,0.00014209842,6.470794e-7,0.0000027887602,0.0009910769,0.98901653,0.00036377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021995367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004128637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47454035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006214385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068126414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072348734","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00661.x","title":"ASSESSING MUTUAL PARTNER‐ABUSE CLAIMS IN CHILD CUSTODY AND ACCESS CASES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Child custody; Power (physics); Domestic violence; Psychology; Child abuse; Criminology; Law; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Geography","score_opus":0.11242184705250083,"score_gpt":0.42720280270329497,"score_spread":0.3147809556507941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072348734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.705691,0.26832697,0.000009416898,0.01184266,0.00028770627,0.0010188377,0.0000059478525,0.00010980466,0.012707685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7147008,0.28299892,0.00012953872,0.0018350036,0.00018308242,0.00005059631,0.0000045381075,0.000009990649,0.000087498534],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822146,0.00026781234,0.0003542868,0.00032430762,0.0004147587,0.0004173492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928427,0.00018752748,0.00013201515,0.00014361783,0.000114376155,0.0001382114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000797266,0.00018773682,0.00047677688,0.000033067758,0.0007385476,0.00030535116,0.00029387826,0.00009895624,0.00003849774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045769438,0.00014902248,0.00007668307,0.0004798933,0.00033743153,0.0009783962,0.0001065641,0.00027388684,0.0000510125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005063499,0.0014861968,0.1618677,0.010033247,0.0004676658,0.002140308,0.15286934,0.0001718401,0.00018141506,0.0292648,0.053621195,0.5878456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081741996,0.000051809733,0.26237312,0.014138554,0.0001822045,0.000031827025,0.013806157,0.0000050773733,0.0000116310675,0.00039088394,0.7073367,0.00085461675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066467714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005191968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6537155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002770512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001088236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075057681","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00660.x","title":"MOVIN' ON","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05976005348880054,"score_gpt":0.3591633051035167,"score_spread":0.29940325161471615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075057681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016422166,0.41911343,0.00003328191,0.11304899,0.0010634197,0.0017346711,0.000012164188,0.00037589174,0.448196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24946856,0.7164765,0.0007072942,0.027500441,0.000706775,0.00011454333,0.000006251568,0.000020771002,0.0049988627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998727,0.000120437704,0.0001908401,0.00019555085,0.00047393306,0.00029222041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994901,0.00007436009,0.00007090814,0.00015247667,0.00010391134,0.00010828412],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052975473,0.00012374148,0.00027702836,0.00001167279,0.00053625175,0.00003272359,0.00024049876,0.000059990387,0.00014467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005019888,0.000088848996,0.0001334476,0.00022601295,0.00016273589,0.00009987797,0.00003655928,0.00015089793,0.0015893179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011839034,0.00037274463,0.0007549102,0.0016251984,0.00017345669,0.00006166318,0.017066153,0.000041953903,0.00013760186,0.2133407,0.58680725,0.17960653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012166014,0.000026376376,0.005473716,0.0017135765,0.00002780032,2.2648734e-7,0.00049584795,1.1924568e-7,0.0000037969567,0.00050380506,0.99149346,0.00013958571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030570067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040948237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44319713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003187573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008382302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081683432","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00665.x","title":"ASSESSMENTS FOR POSTSEPARATION PARENTING DISPUTES IN CANADA","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Mental health; Family law; Supreme court; Law; Psychology; Best interests; Child custody; Political science; Criminal law; Common law; Order (exchange); Psychiatry; Business","score_opus":0.06501038362968176,"score_gpt":0.42279650164150706,"score_spread":0.3577861180118253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081683432","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19007105,0.73021257,0.0015938058,0.06329589,0.0015753118,0.0050433283,0.00009039132,0.00005927717,0.008058345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8776049,0.10768525,0.0022759908,0.011644135,0.00024572588,0.00014121135,0.00018948605,0.000019303565,0.00019398174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988705,0.000034147444,0.00040778023,0.00018511427,0.00027864188,0.00022382996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935037,0.00011293465,0.00009143764,0.00017856168,0.00016236774,0.000104299696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052746857,0.0001000653,0.00034470108,0.000028817314,0.000044259425,0.000008199004,0.000064895605,0.000052255604,0.000017935245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003051848,0.00008513646,0.00005157068,0.00018099078,0.000007906984,0.00005111783,0.000015499967,0.00025464644,0.000005345868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001272022,0.000586769,0.36004978,0.120113865,0.00019747912,0.00035252707,0.0008474218,0.0001783646,0.00026904247,0.01284715,0.1592166,0.3452138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016801115,0.0002746565,0.13154033,0.021423146,0.00020293359,0.000018002966,0.00023710732,0.0002605309,0.00002255387,0.0006014311,0.8434216,0.0003176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54020417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4734379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68753386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006559577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031014706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5501876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086240373","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00911.x","title":"THE CORPORAL PUNISHMENT DEBATE IN CANADA","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporal punishment; Parliament; Supreme court; Punishment (psychology); Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Criminology; Psychology; Politics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03143154448091205,"score_gpt":0.28356313753981477,"score_spread":0.2521315930589027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086240373","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10121939,0.7136733,0.0000038417434,0.0056084427,0.0021052114,0.0008493277,0.000013775414,0.000021879127,0.1765048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79639447,0.17692082,0.00002398683,0.024099896,0.000049787883,0.00013117187,0.000012862387,0.000025921152,0.0023411042],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887055,0.00019850723,0.0003056376,0.00017995897,0.00015854041,0.00028681237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930906,0.000123161,0.00007707581,0.00040496592,0.000023817653,0.000061887324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043326916,0.000115171875,0.00024590577,0.000015754185,0.00006713845,0.0000115819885,0.00018491314,0.00002472659,0.0006095894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030865507,0.0000755908,0.000052797997,0.00020867103,0.000020475905,0.000018360846,0.0000119709575,0.00017814533,0.00024381626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007443042,0.000064619286,0.015928632,0.00012462758,0.00009728836,0.0002457811,0.00010953795,0.0000017487004,0.0000022770535,0.024642251,0.8210378,0.13773794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020278072,0.000009660142,0.110601716,0.0004767485,0.000029580306,0.000014498369,0.000086042084,0.0000014486329,9.806122e-7,0.00009040083,0.8883957,0.00009042351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3703363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.794321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69517505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001741015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037067026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66745764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105190709","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12060","title":"Controversy about the Role of Children's Lawyers: Advocate or Best Interests Guardian? Comparing Practices in Two Canadian Jurisdictions with Different Policies for Lawyers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Citation; Law; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06301285000555393,"score_gpt":0.4044794314693569,"score_spread":0.34146658146380293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105190709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4027564,0.041613974,0.00006656965,0.35928044,0.0009419525,0.0085978955,0.00014565776,0.00009007882,0.18650703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982119,0.0122462455,0.000111471345,0.0044108573,0.0001514034,0.00041259816,0.00002351025,0.000012856034,0.00051205535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998609,0.00027176412,0.00038247072,0.00017771799,0.0002272288,0.00033181146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979837,0.000695365,0.0005406557,0.0002620859,0.0003709192,0.00014730715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069514726,0.000137987,0.0003198328,0.000119488606,0.00046017455,0.00021315379,0.00034021132,0.000039452923,0.00017681478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010822364,0.000086698965,0.00006828795,0.0005613919,0.00021498463,0.0007187043,0.000019146539,0.00029654708,0.00003953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016118838,0.0011616589,0.45821404,0.0009194554,0.0008917317,0.0000025754157,0.067119725,0.00009754858,0.00008262319,0.23499252,0.16842254,0.067934394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003894199,0.00006287146,0.07902503,0.00125389,0.00016990014,0.000002605692,0.0165389,0.00004303011,0.0000055581054,0.00018020972,0.90215254,0.00017606303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7885646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84763587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73372996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019684479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014276003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35393372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110783394","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00070.x","title":"THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA UPHOLDING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SECTION 43 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA: WHAT THIS DECISION MEANS TO THE CHILD WELFARE SECTOR*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Section (typography); Law; Criminal code; Code (set theory); Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Criminal law; Computer science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.03114747434942486,"score_gpt":0.2859998624272431,"score_spread":0.2548523880778183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110783394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7435867,0.14742355,0.00010873535,0.09054546,0.004029768,0.004103516,0.00070763857,0.000013484747,0.009481095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846679,0.014575441,0.00004003783,0.0005047938,0.000101811784,0.00002042365,0.0000020338168,0.0000066931652,0.00008088404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955743,0.0007415204,0.0009734601,0.00021438424,0.0021980368,0.00029831196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956463,0.0015138858,0.0009046369,0.00060306006,0.0012810824,0.000051015802],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030707559,0.00019457827,0.00055171864,0.000012575889,0.0021947515,0.000025119403,0.001228176,0.00007250675,0.000056952824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024504012,0.00007439059,0.00027120303,0.0007443865,0.0010163647,0.00011400402,0.00024845905,0.00026409322,2.255207e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031889032,0.0003897145,0.049427412,0.0034198225,0.0009221715,0.0000030415551,0.021114029,0.008166668,0.0019336521,0.09734438,0.7781659,0.038794342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021392846,0.000028722614,0.3860305,0.006049604,0.00033600314,0.0000031047089,0.013884745,0.000039962964,0.0007259439,0.00018496519,0.59233016,0.00017233638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96438766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99532145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33660308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063013023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015959697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118147250","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00882.x","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF MODERN CANADIAN FAMILY LAW PROCEDURE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Family law; Law; Equity (law); Government (linguistics); Political science; Common law; Substantive law; Civil procedure; Civil law (Civil law); Public law","score_opus":0.033959379861419545,"score_gpt":0.3046778811358444,"score_spread":0.2707185012744248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118147250","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002928757,0.6852533,0.000017124401,0.007911132,0.000325616,0.0010267907,0.000013252355,0.000038569797,0.3024854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82991093,0.16482289,0.00011629261,0.0031151196,0.00008635484,0.00008064697,0.000002116267,0.0000112342195,0.0018543894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998302,0.00034205313,0.00029298296,0.00018338964,0.00045283645,0.0004267693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990514,0.00011692633,0.00012940406,0.00019009926,0.0003390087,0.00017314476],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011867192,0.00013207988,0.00028295376,0.000013231172,0.0014126014,0.00003858717,0.000303849,0.000086790584,0.000017186963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070340955,0.00008362892,0.00012661821,0.00032278657,0.00041235954,0.00012378447,0.000018129147,0.00015342918,0.00006634671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034826076,0.000046161036,0.0018692162,0.0010415674,0.00012950765,0.0000040637815,0.0066112047,0.00000940659,0.000168994,0.78222567,0.18496037,0.022930397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005829875,0.000010665313,0.0048306207,0.0006675114,0.000048340353,3.3051217e-7,0.0029809831,0.000005512736,0.0000017615693,0.002033374,0.9892348,0.00012780305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33086115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47954857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8269822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007740943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007290501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126014122","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12172","title":"Association for Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Eldercaring Coordinators","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Grievance; Conflict resolution; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.16248180424463685,"score_gpt":0.4167717372777731,"score_spread":0.2542899330331363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126014122","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0109956255,0.4854556,0.16944672,0.20533371,0.016223231,0.013207652,0.00054330553,0.0006498493,0.09814429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1937504,0.43395346,0.06516943,0.09988179,0.019700715,0.0063402215,0.0018421069,0.0003325756,0.1790293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860036,0.00011162338,0.00039017698,0.00020197939,0.0004116898,0.00028416223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650234,0.00024515894,0.00021702329,0.00011358559,0.0028175027,0.00010439197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041857003,0.000106431544,0.00025306916,0.000037096437,0.0003477612,0.00007316143,0.000175571,0.00011415824,0.0000061131445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057752486,0.000104519895,0.00018374457,0.00014524382,0.000021368205,0.0001478256,0.000021802896,0.000060760387,0.0000107696205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061146566,0.000010635093,0.00036484902,0.00020562261,0.000035753277,1.4565418e-7,0.00032410122,0.00008155645,0.000041519932,0.06308827,0.93105346,0.004788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021336768,0.000038108425,0.00009141797,0.0006882627,0.00007765548,1.6132034e-7,0.0005655669,0.0037191333,0.0000029208152,0.0012467306,0.9932178,0.00013887066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054843165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18275477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005945458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003539083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6913929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127238270","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00180.x","title":"CHOOSE TO HUG, NOT HIT*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of the Child; Convention; Psychology; Political science; Law; Criminology; Human rights","score_opus":0.05173435427324811,"score_gpt":0.36794030055490257,"score_spread":0.31620594628165444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127238270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09631399,0.41080233,0.0006953809,0.011790556,0.0029035022,0.0018406023,0.000029471528,0.00029819825,0.47532597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5985346,0.08110561,0.0014079367,0.29180458,0.002165727,0.00016087317,0.000048422986,0.00015038314,0.024621857],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985319,0.000058234156,0.00041375821,0.00036071672,0.0002123696,0.00042306742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988822,0.00010188974,0.00007144637,0.0006691821,0.000059413374,0.0002158951],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086134125,0.00018340591,0.00038697725,0.00007190861,0.000056265028,0.000013544949,0.00028468328,0.00008421692,0.002826727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052971634,0.00015691142,0.00016244454,0.0003318949,0.000020589623,0.000039088725,0.00004395978,0.00022351897,0.018942067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021050675,0.000098189026,0.00032893562,0.00019499568,0.000044962377,0.0000913562,0.00021702483,8.693589e-8,0.00006770168,0.002066744,0.4497392,0.54712975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022921502,0.000032817967,0.23444743,0.0009969998,0.000049686918,0.00002094908,0.000026020534,6.939238e-8,0.000022576507,0.000028043958,0.7639891,0.00015706004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006564673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023596354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5469727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003434901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019651687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99808484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131284740","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01296.x","title":"PARENTAL ALIENATION: CANADIAN COURT CASES 1989–2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Citation; Family court; Sociology; Law; History; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04782442497088262,"score_gpt":0.3398939775480977,"score_spread":0.29206955257721506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131284740","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12524442,0.34784508,0.000008860213,0.2697962,0.008381438,0.0044027055,0.0003605543,0.00053802726,0.24342273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89204,0.09768455,0.00034019814,0.0061644185,0.0008200026,0.000101388556,0.000045786554,0.000016910724,0.0027867365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981549,0.00016112464,0.00030756663,0.00028450674,0.00056417246,0.0005277623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875563,0.00015760971,0.00011528093,0.00021570093,0.00030409673,0.00045165553],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007758211,0.00018936288,0.00035394734,0.00003531727,0.0013044643,0.00009124436,0.00037790535,0.0001284248,0.0010820545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010032222,0.00015269055,0.00014958088,0.0002990625,0.0003030809,0.0002283236,0.000044817814,0.00032301046,0.00070193113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018320374,0.00006974843,0.015195049,0.00027584023,0.00006866989,0.00010530361,0.003937737,6.3836427e-7,0.00006224007,0.0076197297,0.95210904,0.020554177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007639806,0.000014730116,0.023542412,0.00034453956,0.000050930325,0.000007911522,0.001271263,0.000002501472,0.000002077845,0.00003604552,0.97442925,0.00022192241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5327355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8437976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7667956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003099982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004469676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139087767","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01412.x","title":"THE “EYE OF THE BEHOLDER”: PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS ABOUT THE BEST INTERESTS OF A CHILD","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Child custody; State (computer science); Function (biology); Best interests; Psychology; Political science; Law; Empirical research; Social psychology; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.1021398112332396,"score_gpt":0.37622963121187525,"score_spread":0.27408981997863563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139087767","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05432821,0.6389264,0.000005261682,0.1579866,0.0038530075,0.0050288746,0.000104118735,0.000055498505,0.13971202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8099072,0.18491298,0.00003924015,0.001908975,0.00019341521,0.00014814614,0.0000022931026,0.000010603032,0.0028771788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981372,0.00057596114,0.00041006086,0.00013376249,0.00051031454,0.00023273287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998707,0.00030298217,0.00035635757,0.00034741807,0.00024384688,0.000042426607],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00118213,0.00012158877,0.00028112682,0.0000061786823,0.0014497485,0.000014367537,0.0009919098,0.000057649188,0.000058552792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007764202,0.000044344746,0.0002556975,0.00026424415,0.0011659518,0.000069958944,0.00027573842,0.0002686039,0.000026460279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044577613,0.0010695433,0.066657774,0.0030026513,0.0008995767,0.000002089551,0.15515871,0.0000010623138,0.00013638794,0.22382244,0.44983396,0.09937125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074822776,0.000021476739,0.23673287,0.0053469995,0.00008919033,3.6220487e-7,0.007568746,6.520386e-7,0.000016017055,0.00020505197,0.7498586,0.00008519003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002568328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017543902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.755579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040130537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011025395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142554591","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2002.tb00848.x","title":"DETERMINING THE EFFECTIVE REPRESENTATION OF A CHILD IN OUR LEGAL SYSTEM","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Association (psychology); Process (computing); Professional responsibility; Psychology; Law; Professional conduct; Child custody; Association rule learning; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.03252536613617515,"score_gpt":0.33035479595454686,"score_spread":0.29782942981837174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142554591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04790783,0.29500026,0.000072559706,0.017567493,0.0011651368,0.005272876,0.000010434051,0.00013239562,0.63287103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862348,0.012835832,0.0000062953372,0.0004774819,0.00022019204,0.00008228026,6.416568e-7,0.0000060690236,0.00013642019],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985131,0.0005022722,0.00033514234,0.0001499075,0.0003383425,0.00016123064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936926,0.00012629172,0.00020831876,0.00014356158,0.000118510754,0.000034078443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010564869,0.00007724487,0.00032923825,0.0000312756,0.00019954526,0.00003426808,0.00020176661,0.000046374847,0.000008161632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005313638,0.000052584695,0.00008354133,0.0005482381,0.00004216672,0.00019107958,0.000022557277,0.00012242307,0.000037390357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029354958,0.00052399747,0.10021816,0.025565421,0.00020532339,0.00009155193,0.038070735,0.000041787775,0.00009239563,0.06641686,0.15014431,0.6186001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001038575,0.00018969511,0.120691374,0.056402605,0.00023943205,0.000011747601,0.020064868,0.00028790714,0.000046107678,0.00010329292,0.80034745,0.00057696475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073867952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010051925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93832695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007994246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029265624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152358658","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00659.x","title":"CANADIAN ISSUE, EH?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Citation; Law; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.041699897021226,"score_gpt":0.37368938095527743,"score_spread":0.3319894839340514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152358658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007742483,0.42569518,0.00011598459,0.112450816,0.0010306643,0.0006863918,0.000014007379,0.00016339167,0.4590693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10456897,0.7768745,0.0026131428,0.08617307,0.001046558,0.00007344792,0.0000130773615,0.000053718624,0.028583502],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985942,0.00008999101,0.00023176834,0.00021854875,0.00047259577,0.0003928546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990618,0.00006637869,0.00006702468,0.00026534844,0.00019244828,0.00034695337],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010054932,0.0001066062,0.00024161606,0.00007277008,0.0003840871,0.00007375608,0.00048329378,0.00007774537,0.0011886103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008176275,0.000097501295,0.00007517021,0.00063649856,0.00008198213,0.00015813833,0.00002293203,0.00013389655,0.0043449607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.500119e-7,0.000022289805,0.00015238862,0.00041991394,0.000011595023,0.000052130817,0.00088360795,0.0000068908016,0.0000034976351,0.024040675,0.7472458,0.2271604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005512214,0.000008416754,0.00090517383,0.0017747275,0.000019227202,0.0000014879823,0.0001548241,8.3219135e-8,0.0000011313089,0.0028170175,0.9941353,0.00012749167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17727663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31590715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4304858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003962043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020857202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165826771","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00216.x","title":"CUSTODY DISPUTES INVOLVING ALLEGATIONS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: TOWARD A DIFFERENTIATED APPROACH TO PARENTING PLANS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Differential (mechanical device); Child abuse; Social psychology; Poison control; Criminology; Developmental psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Medical emergency; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.07078689713719062,"score_gpt":0.34329649021113967,"score_spread":0.27250959307394906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165826771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38543576,0.2959478,0.03308156,0.0012786563,0.0020694034,0.0068129343,0.00027969232,0.00088346895,0.27421075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8515704,0.1458867,0.0014671847,0.0006798606,0.000091234215,0.0001204127,0.000042372343,0.000016322752,0.0001254619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976048,0.00029513537,0.00060641574,0.00037136898,0.0006348176,0.00048746212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987875,0.00019422846,0.00020648273,0.00031349243,0.0002852907,0.00021300565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007729465,0.00021302953,0.0005641027,0.00010452081,0.0005356684,0.000032779117,0.00055892026,0.0000917229,0.00004720237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005803305,0.00018657117,0.0001684124,0.00078634865,0.0002640418,0.00018441772,0.00010854925,0.00019951115,0.00010318316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001241708,0.0054434882,0.24991138,0.03378552,0.0010343427,0.00017799763,0.149786,0.0010507593,0.007545323,0.27475953,0.17836468,0.098016806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011759567,0.00026470324,0.82553566,0.063945,0.000868792,0.00004357578,0.014670529,0.0032333876,0.00012645562,0.0016215479,0.0859351,0.0025792893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008649765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018586938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5756243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006933626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002458996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76081514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468368803","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12231","title":"1‐800‐Skype‐Me","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Mode (computer interface); Psychology; Computer science; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.04594586685681762,"score_gpt":0.33330446399460206,"score_spread":0.28735859713778444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468368803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007295749,0.34688425,0.0023117228,0.09746779,0.0022157163,0.0012928692,0.000038330865,0.0003422476,0.54215133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15745533,0.8016515,0.0005979058,0.006143811,0.00042614414,0.00005148349,0.0000065606246,0.000026038086,0.033641245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865854,0.00023336979,0.0002548126,0.00019985798,0.00036303443,0.00029039194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991449,0.00024088575,0.00008899512,0.00026334077,0.0001228161,0.00013903786],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011881647,0.00010409458,0.00022197298,0.00003640846,0.00032183464,0.000028069047,0.00028572467,0.000099498226,0.0003776396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045219346,0.00006391541,0.00012805701,0.00028854472,0.00016967363,0.00014499242,0.000035124012,0.00010303731,0.0017924198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029902374,0.00007441435,0.0075981426,0.00041634706,0.00004859886,0.000013495052,0.00065311836,7.4093583e-7,0.0003331919,0.32696286,0.4361631,0.22773299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009258,0.000009943151,0.007816588,0.0021662673,0.000030441852,6.788663e-7,0.000091087364,0.0000056140366,3.8051314e-7,0.002316972,0.98733234,0.00013711363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017533384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013542923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5511692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010174976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018694857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522893009","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12236","title":"Understanding Pathways to Family Dispute Resolution and Justice Reforms: Ontario Court File Analysis &amp; Survey of Professionals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family court; Negotiation; Economic Justice; Mediation; Attendance; Dispute resolution; Family mediation; Family law; Psychology; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.23509296250817574,"score_gpt":0.3600738974728618,"score_spread":0.12498093496468604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522893009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3972969,0.15945299,0.24877927,0.038388215,0.005017974,0.010446599,0.010367185,0.0005667121,0.12968414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84800965,0.12971458,0.0047523915,0.0027331898,0.00015080161,0.00013843848,0.0006653066,0.000050041683,0.013785579],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972609,0.0006712023,0.0006272655,0.00038641924,0.0006769376,0.00037724772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761707,0.0010679953,0.0003267116,0.00037886095,0.00036990372,0.0002394717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042523495,0.00018616597,0.00059684244,0.00020338388,0.00060082856,0.000037602265,0.00027357103,0.00017048267,0.00025291034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012629032,0.000120619945,0.00015983565,0.001314415,0.00019678177,0.0002229588,0.00011162479,0.00018219795,0.00005476654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000150739,0.0005197842,0.13014647,0.002577086,0.0015537152,0.0000120687355,0.01562699,0.00019713852,0.00057132886,0.094587855,0.742986,0.01107079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023326013,0.000051190123,0.826569,0.005688538,0.00097386236,4.914448e-7,0.0015237697,0.000113406066,2.3120681e-7,0.0010824284,0.16338736,0.0003764676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035753388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24277487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6964225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008253487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063671987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9706676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576862296","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12267","title":"A Survey of Beliefs and Priorities About Access to Justice of Family Law: The Search for A Multidisciplinary Perspective*","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Mental health; Family law; Law; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Political science; Popularity; Psychology; Public relations; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.28785571453105835,"score_gpt":0.5381772428008942,"score_spread":0.25032152826983584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576862296","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1190587,0.24898118,0.00084753137,0.42846274,0.0021565203,0.008069271,0.00074706384,0.00005421182,0.1916228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92708766,0.06718023,0.00063810375,0.003703537,0.00018442216,0.00014305873,0.000006162937,0.00001259949,0.0010442316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987153,0.0003632339,0.00029097707,0.00016768023,0.00030148585,0.00016133334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961742,0.0013506622,0.0002803172,0.00039645468,0.0017336648,0.00006469021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041707703,0.000079905156,0.00026154696,0.000036485235,0.0012080695,0.00021935227,0.0006478819,0.000043291675,0.000016358083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046108067,0.000059663656,0.000049845272,0.00024663578,0.0004926822,0.00059034384,0.00015821413,0.00015739136,0.0000046232744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011659423,0.00036554146,0.020850373,0.0067921826,0.00017334206,0.0000010329247,0.09005101,0.000004468943,0.0003159989,0.7455723,0.103102066,0.03265504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015332583,0.000058474794,0.7728348,0.0013072315,0.00011304769,2.994631e-7,0.011863773,0.000008976779,0.000010586854,0.0004094736,0.21312651,0.00011351914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07816269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008991742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80802894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045489433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008857336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9291616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750155760","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12289","title":"Crossover Cases of High‐Conflict Families Involving Child Protection Services: Ontario Research Findings and Suggestions for Good Practices","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Harm; Economic Justice; Family court; Child protection; Crossover; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Medicine; Nursing; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.17887186734947072,"score_gpt":0.4240792760886152,"score_spread":0.24520740873914446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750155760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8837968,0.10138691,0.000012130277,0.0030882629,0.000404401,0.0024522487,0.00008597719,0.000039179842,0.008734053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434705,0.05309475,0.00019662558,0.000583215,0.00019804575,0.00048238836,0.000031430533,0.000032834316,0.0019102447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984033,0.0001549734,0.00040219148,0.0004607474,0.00024165833,0.00033713283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976745,0.0004786088,0.0005824085,0.00082260784,0.00036257083,0.000079308076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014305434,0.00018712852,0.00045559593,0.00011171888,0.0010676578,0.0001906314,0.00036300163,0.00014271158,0.0001890416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006070362,0.00016172,0.000108882836,0.000109422625,0.00019727925,0.00050433935,0.00012300222,0.00047647706,0.000051308685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002650052,0.0044974783,0.3045953,0.10207057,0.004324609,0.00035140823,0.06386132,0.000006214208,0.0024800866,0.1823322,0.08953957,0.24329121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009102973,0.00026364246,0.5427741,0.008249811,0.00020015922,0.00007911309,0.0004937094,0.000003013484,0.000051460287,0.00024226424,0.44654012,0.00019231912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13365914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07169802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35700053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060998147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009046192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9452411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765402529","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12301","title":"Shared Parenting in Canada: Increasing Use But Continued Controversy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Statute; Statutory law; Presumption; Child custody; Political science; Child support; Psychology; Law; Family law; Criminology","score_opus":0.07694001248423663,"score_gpt":0.3333489573152807,"score_spread":0.25640894483104404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765402529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.857796,0.10448079,0.000003225402,0.016069787,0.0010628365,0.0017271992,0.000086325796,0.00007142177,0.018702392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951615,0.045713622,0.00014187423,0.0017275168,0.00016270467,0.00004146949,0.000007661613,0.000010574319,0.0005796087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789613,0.00040538303,0.00040784967,0.00027857,0.0005193745,0.0004927099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843043,0.00047688826,0.00041176018,0.0003175485,0.00022194383,0.00014141705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012615978,0.0001757144,0.0006088977,0.00001363078,0.0013970716,0.0003165212,0.000530421,0.000058521106,0.00006553636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009075006,0.00014858603,0.00010240445,0.000083730745,0.00017615489,0.00059039175,0.00015454575,0.00021378009,0.000025332363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023707367,0.00003869236,0.8825356,0.00071107043,0.00012319587,0.00012991554,0.0026938356,0.0000013810927,0.00018731387,0.0011312012,0.0802702,0.032153882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029826094,0.0000029723028,0.66772366,0.0029124136,0.000043694243,3.9386885e-7,0.0017720126,0.000010233805,0.0000013279691,0.000009358922,0.32702914,0.00019654506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24675894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011506312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073224347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962752731","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12422","title":"Innovative Family Mediation Research Initiative Embedded in the Community In Ireland","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Statutory law; Test (biology); Empirical research; Public relations; Directive; Resource (disambiguation); Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1480351670368052,"score_gpt":0.3542271658687037,"score_spread":0.20619199883189848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962752731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75268054,0.03405804,0.000037114027,0.003981823,0.000240901,0.0011891475,0.00019487506,0.0000116446745,0.20760591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623134,0.02729278,0.00005293833,0.009940941,0.00003976733,0.00009843998,0.00010466987,0.000013962555,0.00014306197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773186,0.0006972634,0.00079025206,0.0002550601,0.00009121409,0.0004343396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813503,0.0009993522,0.00021472151,0.00048793879,0.00011617467,0.0000467947],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071459664,0.00015361291,0.0006044067,0.00020116534,0.000094623174,0.000043687975,0.00054335955,0.0001458978,0.00012097846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007225639,0.00013610108,0.000070045695,0.001057382,0.00012649853,0.0002099865,0.000111697576,0.0012829133,0.0021288544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015962518,0.000275821,0.20607363,0.00085338036,0.000036809462,0.0000064030983,0.0050084824,0.00003410148,0.000002866138,0.76683545,0.018810831,0.0020462677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008427122,0.00012842404,0.8034049,0.00088455307,0.0000037494847,0.000001294614,0.0038382662,0.0011478327,2.7626717e-7,0.08165099,0.10779132,0.00030566938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014486439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017315344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6851845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040197402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008216735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003924243","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12456","title":"Parenting Coordination and Confidentiality: A (Not‐so) Delicate Balance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child and Adolescent Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; CLARITY; Discretion; Psychology; Balance (ability); Political science; Law; Social psychology; Public relations; Business; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10634250027165601,"score_gpt":0.41459177967210925,"score_spread":0.3082492794004532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003924243","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19380236,0.45180225,0.0027098663,0.3378482,0.0013431865,0.0060104323,0.00014431858,0.0006062038,0.0057332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65442127,0.156486,0.00012265047,0.18803245,0.00054890785,0.000021565043,0.000055410885,0.00002384752,0.00028789337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980479,0.00043820875,0.00063498714,0.00032645673,0.00021601125,0.00033643292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898326,0.00014442431,0.00029998636,0.00019341968,0.000139802,0.00023912509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083222677,0.00014391865,0.00045634265,0.000018003784,0.00046526687,0.000018016002,0.0001280654,0.000076627504,0.00013693717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030502968,0.0001253451,0.000060943945,0.00018859241,0.000037386144,0.00009253495,0.000110764755,0.00048679835,0.00040539843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007132654,0.000091564216,0.05721887,0.06696381,0.000062924024,0.000011533927,0.004231067,5.814953e-7,0.0020023831,0.0043478683,0.695732,0.16926609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006297783,0.000041309228,0.059789848,0.015392354,0.000080086735,0.000001577884,0.0003853872,0.00051528047,0.0000036798895,0.000048692706,0.9229105,0.00020146587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016075831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012827805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4606189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003947297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020668517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5210712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021709107","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12487","title":"An Interdisciplinary Case Management Protocol for Child Resistance or Refusal Dynamics<sup>†</sup>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Psychology; Focus group; Conflict resolution; Introspection; Protocol (science); Accountability; Conflict management; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06547832487396374,"score_gpt":0.409277610102394,"score_spread":0.3437992852284303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021709107","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076584046,0.0085459575,0.016985279,0.12831365,0.00048780735,0.5940747,0.0005166968,0.0008602796,0.24944973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059337508,0.024567766,0.0442269,0.033767264,0.0027602476,0.8115543,0.00056422944,0.00037303905,0.022848759],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977398,0.00033876149,0.0005773753,0.00053940277,0.00038673193,0.00041793752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987971,0.00012117306,0.00019971178,0.00041945037,0.00014669794,0.0003158221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011368422,0.0002407127,0.00041642934,0.000051882485,0.0012628754,0.00011363373,0.0005346714,0.00013333235,0.000081760176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012804622,0.00018993771,0.00019104175,0.00055917085,0.00016059857,0.00025790153,0.00017230268,0.00029184853,0.000058217127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001042455,0.0011980432,0.00042804205,0.037062988,0.0004020644,0.003120103,0.01613289,0.00059500715,0.000002363,0.32189426,0.50817066,0.1099511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096434396,0.00023211873,0.00018834697,0.0050570834,0.0001424496,0.000022729506,0.0066274004,0.0192311,6.765834e-8,0.0012387102,0.965848,0.0004476348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040441613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001112842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45767733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022474203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013755637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97131443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045589255","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12508","title":"Emerging Parenting Coordination Practices Around the Globe: What We Have Learned","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Confidentiality; Referral; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Law; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.13257453789532433,"score_gpt":0.38678678235331915,"score_spread":0.25421224445799484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045589255","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005449474,0.43225044,0.0005634448,0.54108036,0.00078831805,0.00092608965,0.0000029009002,0.00011245076,0.018826539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2747935,0.7151472,0.00019281954,0.008337574,0.000633692,0.000036440866,0.000017002754,0.000017223992,0.000824563],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978992,0.00066887157,0.00035151147,0.00026997481,0.00053870643,0.00027173822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841905,0.00049765897,0.0006023107,0.00018708078,0.00018212512,0.000111804955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020877584,0.00013120331,0.00023472395,0.000022217066,0.0010952002,0.00049882376,0.00038345036,0.00008333541,0.000059842772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022193172,0.0000947417,0.00012797183,0.00052663015,0.00012635105,0.00090506003,0.000073580886,0.0003667396,0.00016184141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013813701,0.00010595684,0.01129695,0.0021595957,0.00019604679,0.00001982574,0.028737074,0.0003660626,0.00011580545,0.04703964,0.14030181,0.7696474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080371094,0.00001362223,0.00096104946,0.0017914491,0.00011508392,6.634503e-7,0.03147761,0.0048128543,2.1520539e-7,0.0007622023,0.959836,0.00014885464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047534416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034732427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8195342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007246413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016970572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84235054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045659605","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12507","title":"Parenting Coordination Law in the U.S. and Canada: A Review of the Sources and Scope of the <scp>PC</scp>'s Authority","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family and Disability Support Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Jurisdiction; Scope (computer science); Competence (human resources); Professionalization; Intervention (counseling); Law; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07006436415084899,"score_gpt":0.3662774264330587,"score_spread":0.2962130622822097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045659605","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012842464,0.98556674,5.3416113e-7,0.0023736334,0.00027357045,0.003993168,0.00016358391,0.0000070164156,0.0074933507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00036458942,0.9957015,0.000005750196,0.0033815538,0.000056961842,0.00028638326,0.00003064966,0.000026662454,0.00014592947],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928591,0.0037978634,0.0015416319,0.000579244,0.0008337928,0.00038834623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954773,0.0020194813,0.001033073,0.0011980908,0.00017924725,0.00009281628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048032943,0.00042848272,0.0024514333,0.000036125188,0.00018320986,0.000030620584,0.0012693605,0.00020283784,0.000048752303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025029469,0.00020277729,0.00047911314,0.001012434,0.0005817697,0.000056928937,0.0004998462,0.0010856222,0.000005623971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.8198036e-7,0.00006906381,0.0015684905,0.5132028,0.000113994,0.000006408462,0.0002599462,1.2823983e-8,2.4640647e-7,0.0017759325,0.08622277,0.3967796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007080981,0.000020866677,0.0034088613,0.21939509,0.0006417106,0.00002631678,0.00026213,2.671608e-7,1.4880008e-7,0.000034295546,0.77607125,0.0000682401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.109814264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050866764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6898485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094006966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011311403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9664524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045858742","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12505","title":"New <scp>AFCC</scp> Guidelines for Parenting Coordination (2019)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Marriage and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Task (project management); Task force; Statute; Psychology; Multiculturalism; Work (physics); Political science; Engineering; Law; Public administration; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.12659980702886497,"score_gpt":0.38425707759048255,"score_spread":0.2576572705616176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045858742","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018564352,0.55607927,0.18766643,0.16054145,0.0031462058,0.0057239123,0.00014072229,0.0008051163,0.08404046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009916557,0.69954103,0.058035493,0.18199734,0.010092159,0.00031660232,0.00051215914,0.00016540509,0.039423224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811906,0.00014443029,0.0005696485,0.00033880203,0.00043466064,0.0003933988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820226,0.00036958398,0.00026481383,0.00019089354,0.0006794476,0.00029297953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013505737,0.00017652991,0.00042606128,0.000029765886,0.00033895584,0.00010265549,0.0004238518,0.00011145855,0.00005959233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072476347,0.0001662361,0.00021965212,0.0004561625,0.000040325103,0.00022644874,0.0000629332,0.00012779825,0.00015394461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.797244e-7,0.0000067306355,0.0003178868,0.00047315663,0.000014983734,0.0000013465159,0.0005992678,0.000003807475,0.000038838727,0.0036878265,0.89073473,0.104120664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018612521,0.000029954645,0.0003492536,0.0008239964,0.000095847216,2.659453e-7,0.00082102383,0.00082703604,0.0000017020072,0.0004987771,0.99627924,0.000086787106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005610797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012952193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1434618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053253792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003878273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8676619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045968056","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12509","title":"Effective Use of Parenting Coordination: Considerations for Legal and Mental Health Professionals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Intervention (counseling); Referral; Family law; Mental health; Conciliation; Dispute resolution; Psychology; Family court; Conflict resolution; Nursing; Political science; Law; Medicine; Mediation; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.09951592691784956,"score_gpt":0.3833228083569018,"score_spread":0.28380688143905225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045968056","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028472655,0.19738439,0.004859455,0.7520091,0.0010759532,0.013128002,0.00054860784,0.0001300347,0.002391799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91848487,0.047590885,0.008536521,0.024301255,0.00019733967,0.00027619392,0.00011196696,0.000020222416,0.00048076166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893737,0.00031703955,0.0002924893,0.00014712987,0.00017969773,0.0001262755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987189,0.0007592103,0.00019158647,0.000053064105,0.00017768862,0.00009954916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007555176,0.00006914854,0.00025145028,0.000019496436,0.00062272965,0.000039055834,0.000040361065,0.000040337927,0.000014007843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012194172,0.000060108345,0.00006290048,0.00015084652,0.00009204188,0.00018734051,0.000025290814,0.00008849059,0.0000021816004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015130487,0.00015419674,0.007452845,0.00468639,0.00011672172,0.0000012381076,0.011328711,0.000022775394,0.00012422854,0.36532208,0.58681875,0.023956921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000560156,0.00016649652,0.015243091,0.0046578553,0.000069177164,0.0000014528835,0.0029335024,0.00263996,0.0000028052505,0.0013121575,0.9721777,0.00023568246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015884129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010410561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8900122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037973798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029407023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4789596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086644390","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12498","title":"Does A Parent's Right to Parenting Matter in Termination of Parental Rights? An Analysis of Court Cases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Neglect; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Constitutional right; Developmental psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03671530957619508,"score_gpt":0.3400446426806057,"score_spread":0.3033293331044106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086644390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870261,0.008809732,0.00003812632,0.0016458486,0.00016690798,0.0005523842,0.00017223632,0.00002243695,0.0015662044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99596494,0.001129044,0.00007684178,0.0025115097,0.00006306192,0.00004491534,0.00015650455,0.000013511672,0.000039658058],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980837,0.00021366584,0.00082328613,0.00041463284,0.00024689318,0.00021779211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989581,0.00010462307,0.0003072369,0.00040894645,0.00010091778,0.00012016688],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002649974,0.00018954898,0.00086045265,0.00022597953,0.00003076744,0.000012103701,0.0002532075,0.000061786646,0.003063802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032588403,0.00012326453,0.00022862508,0.0010231342,0.000038157446,0.00013375834,0.00004419633,0.00011673278,0.00012659273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107407715,0.0012453471,0.9433322,0.002133158,0.0011924128,0.00023481564,0.004661629,0.000028916844,0.0004763514,0.00031781985,0.029111562,0.017158402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045636532,0.00012249238,0.9660692,0.0019013874,0.0014005426,0.0000048549928,0.00044237042,0.000084975545,0.00011376712,0.000021331778,0.029147726,0.00023495285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081075594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007819056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022737058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024424204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001650004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99784756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122448045","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12069","title":"Family Law Proceedings and the Child's Right to be Heard in <scp>A</scp>ustralia, the <scp>U</scp>nited <scp>K</scp>ingdom, <scp>N</scp>ew <scp>Z</scp>ealand, and <scp>C</scp>anada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Active listening; Jurisdiction; Law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Kingdom; Political science; Family court; Common law; Child protection; Strengths and weaknesses; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.027394403517179935,"score_gpt":0.28452474876286604,"score_spread":0.2571303452456861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122448045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8124528,0.07517649,0.00010749434,0.005155665,0.0018718326,0.008875928,0.00043370918,0.000678814,0.09524726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74562806,0.16519387,0.00069121504,0.042487092,0.00512096,0.0022553715,0.0006079176,0.000763762,0.03725173],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98184067,0.0027078232,0.0035088067,0.003364269,0.003985119,0.004593297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715504,0.020551126,0.0022142727,0.0020285677,0.0013862957,0.0022693088],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010684217,0.0025669402,0.0039356044,0.0007704256,0.0044570193,0.002535738,0.0032068188,0.001437849,0.000028554743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025022525,0.0017659407,0.0010962558,0.0044038394,0.0028863754,0.0018500097,0.0009758764,0.0030868698,0.0005506117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011144659,0.0007454604,0.015081724,0.0024395692,0.0007337991,0.00008966963,0.05502418,0.00008812644,0.00047354947,0.059387855,0.8632733,0.002651583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032948803,0.0004566865,0.031260394,0.0036870765,0.0010646327,0.00008994559,0.013120077,0.0003317956,0.0003024973,0.0046896273,0.9414688,0.00023359482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013556457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011772649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09001737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005510178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007888428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139194885","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12559","title":"The Hague Convention and Transnational Custody Disputes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Jurisdiction; Residence; Law; Conflict of laws; Supreme court; Political science; Child custody; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Personal jurisdiction; Psychology; Sociology; Human rights; Demography","score_opus":0.024254080818758357,"score_gpt":0.326433527995847,"score_spread":0.30217944717708867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139194885","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067301476,0.65376157,0.00064811856,0.27506325,0.00096327765,0.00053182716,0.00001370195,0.000069641595,0.06221845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19975758,0.7907724,0.00008700976,0.0024909473,0.00026347025,0.000040372062,0.000027871556,0.000007419966,0.006552921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999201,0.00017103393,0.00014770184,0.0001117206,0.00025813776,0.00011042724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995285,0.00015069195,0.00004367919,0.000084062005,0.00014282398,0.00005024368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007941049,0.000049278293,0.00010092338,0.000007255336,0.0005510166,0.000083695675,0.00006761763,0.000032410488,0.00013744376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009813436,0.00003640433,0.00006349597,0.00013241613,0.000114643626,0.00010179068,0.000011706274,0.000068400666,0.000012668288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018955116,0.000027567448,0.0004571978,0.00020415618,0.000024635516,0.000004574071,0.0006991866,1.8614848e-7,0.00008982158,0.73855877,0.021852901,0.23807913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006442691,0.00000550086,0.011169043,0.00022682597,0.000032875952,0.0000016333145,0.0002522345,0.000012458945,0.0000035929625,0.0009353784,0.98724794,0.000048108945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070859285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005120425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96539503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022194361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012940797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.423803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159762856","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12574","title":"Taking a Shot: Access to Justice, Judging and eCourt","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Settlement (finance); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Law; Nova scotia; Political science; Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Process (computing); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08464916832842004,"score_gpt":0.3367907881952229,"score_spread":0.25214161986680284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159762856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009907367,0.16618487,0.004342931,0.061996534,0.0020702472,0.0010322011,0.000011928389,0.00040276445,0.75405115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46710998,0.16989103,0.0010113799,0.35536742,0.0031362735,0.00023511364,0.000109142784,0.0001168721,0.0030227744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988938,0.000014029835,0.00027562832,0.00032275193,0.00022580607,0.00026796194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992928,0.000033042394,0.00015262394,0.00026055696,0.00022451731,0.000036474077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029638704,0.00016033341,0.0002993947,0.00010961044,0.0002449046,0.00061716273,0.00020600627,0.000039464416,0.00078285404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030301453,0.00015344446,0.00008911913,0.00074242847,0.000017625256,0.0008386282,0.00034198267,0.00013493389,0.0005166006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057385555,0.00013148235,0.0029588833,0.011037906,0.00007593816,0.00009979477,0.000017399843,0.00004345175,0.00041801893,0.038873076,0.65324944,0.29308885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111431655,0.0000017061756,0.026198529,0.0032413504,0.00029723087,0.00000944542,0.00006769544,0.00042265942,0.0000022809538,0.00008375978,0.96936446,0.00019945554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006276598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000711927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75102836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030426405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004506646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8571703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183973827","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12542","title":"The <i><scp>AFCC‐Ontario</scp> Parenting Plan Guide</i> and <i>Template</i>: Jurisdictionally‐Specific Resources for Family Justice Professionals and Parents","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Plan (archaeology); Conciliation; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Law; Nursing; Medicine; Mediation","score_opus":0.057967735171407325,"score_gpt":0.33761456779584664,"score_spread":0.27964683262443935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183973827","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16572654,0.80689704,0.00003480115,0.008536332,0.0014073974,0.001828767,0.000094364324,0.00010876778,0.015366008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03429159,0.93700755,0.0016864737,0.0065698777,0.0009925151,0.00061991496,0.00008104934,0.000046090157,0.018704949],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969216,0.00047977085,0.00067033747,0.00055826735,0.0007617214,0.00060832035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961215,0.0025303604,0.00033451253,0.00022722146,0.00057333603,0.00021307338],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020128149,0.00029267865,0.0005497472,0.000014966719,0.0040925513,0.00032875937,0.00031110618,0.00013991998,0.00001268738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013851085,0.00019830566,0.00015284764,0.0002525042,0.0003930704,0.00019501233,0.00025827502,0.00031089073,0.000017578777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009602256,0.00008419171,0.01681346,0.0017233972,0.00023998758,0.000017282342,0.022507114,0.000001319448,0.00023831203,0.0033654526,0.93976986,0.01523001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002618088,0.0000191534,0.052177705,0.0020267847,0.00021688952,0.000004355157,0.022113418,0.000002658452,0.0000036832782,0.00019444755,0.92286325,0.00011586475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002474319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00787322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13143495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015764264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026441066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203621158","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12540","title":"Identifying Coercive Control in Canadian Family Law: A Required Analysis in Determining the Best Interests of the Child","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Control (management); Psychology; Family law; Best interests; Psychological intervention; Political science; Law; Criminology; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05914237393214094,"score_gpt":0.35307707261047466,"score_spread":0.2939346986783337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203621158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5865469,0.33178368,0.000010236048,0.03475698,0.0006766437,0.0023863027,0.00008713755,0.000026201145,0.043725908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96451926,0.028658228,0.000020270747,0.006585366,0.000044606833,0.000055078664,0.000004416988,0.0000072356106,0.000105553285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972542,0.0010171835,0.00056304934,0.00027117005,0.0004302126,0.00046419792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987919,0.0003281976,0.00021732508,0.00030370924,0.00025437784,0.00010452075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015503659,0.00015770232,0.0006575034,0.000064477055,0.0005496317,0.00007735648,0.0005617835,0.00008359501,0.000020559053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012065981,0.000096236494,0.00031459267,0.0017075769,0.00034189233,0.00015473073,0.0001102859,0.00031076933,0.000014161831],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011325568,0.00019176904,0.9137537,0.0009988928,0.0011463164,0.000114400274,0.053200617,0.00008400616,0.00022480237,0.006886317,0.0037725517,0.019615337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042265377,0.000009758757,0.90382063,0.0056148604,0.0006558151,5.2451765e-7,0.016637854,0.000066560046,0.0000042840998,0.00006210505,0.07247329,0.0002316707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67912984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37797236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005348527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031617703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42273784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204812783","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12600","title":"The Family Resolutions Specialty Court (<scp>FRSC</scp>): An Evidence‐Informed Court‐Based Innovation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Coparenting; Empirical evidence; Process (computing); Dispute resolution; Specialty; Psychology; Law; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.11080895203991574,"score_gpt":0.37646367698812955,"score_spread":0.2656547249482138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204812783","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04610228,0.60086477,0.006957178,0.09931966,0.0076723853,0.005364443,0.00026389767,0.0008226093,0.2326328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11377018,0.84559953,0.0036939136,0.02150221,0.0019585881,0.0004010937,0.00058243127,0.00010805165,0.012383971],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946003,0.0011760367,0.0012277905,0.00058410614,0.0015506234,0.00086116896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99316174,0.002882669,0.00058537046,0.0010277437,0.0020533884,0.00028909105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056617768,0.00035255053,0.00058398343,0.00016619581,0.0033790548,0.0004921525,0.00088533224,0.0003413756,0.0000552569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009307195,0.00028195212,0.00028241146,0.0034545492,0.0006376777,0.0007623791,0.000114136594,0.0007692041,0.00031261466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010433863,0.00026965063,0.0038126644,0.0006678657,0.00011456092,0.000040364583,0.0015964159,0.00021353482,0.0003033108,0.23251475,0.73726714,0.023189293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024812092,0.000053152537,0.041284885,0.002943624,0.00014644429,0.0000030509289,0.003503542,0.0013852606,0.000003917598,0.0018409509,0.94838184,0.00020523943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006127066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046060146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24473481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004704785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221077201","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12640","title":"Ontario family justice in “lockdown”: Early pandemic cases and professional experience","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre; Queen's University; The King's University; St. Lawrence College; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Pandemic; Criminology; Welfare; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.1236343833310927,"score_gpt":0.4305607956654292,"score_spread":0.3069264123343365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221077201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89853656,0.044146143,0.00000768199,0.019121606,0.0019979696,0.00087349844,0.0000140691745,0.00005219054,0.035250302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94749373,0.020575384,0.00015560455,0.017964616,0.00011328215,0.00046106926,0.0000138374835,0.000008323655,0.013214151],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821,0.00051409466,0.00032839272,0.00023850772,0.000478847,0.0002301284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891317,0.00057930936,0.00014924514,0.00015741658,0.00011161758,0.00008925954],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014393675,0.00009708408,0.00019069744,0.00007208786,0.000921988,0.00006718101,0.00022800692,0.00003950129,0.0014206432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009814812,0.00009474774,0.000031951335,0.0007273644,0.00011049679,0.0004850943,0.00009377316,0.0006741171,0.000042926047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055832068,0.0007323627,0.29617137,0.0007805814,0.000029852734,0.00010957382,0.30181116,0.0000053938193,0.00022036627,0.031992253,0.30584925,0.062242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095552816,0.000023458882,0.10898573,0.0002633755,0.000027517464,0.000009805916,0.019586122,0.0000015136258,1.2271187e-7,0.00007790706,0.8708108,0.00011809374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11635225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029512607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56496155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003824629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021804192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231014250","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12371","title":"Issue Information","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Arizona State University; Newcastle University; Emory University","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.04355394329619234,"score_gpt":0.38976656757069666,"score_spread":0.34621262427450433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231014250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.8377726e-7,0.35413548,0.0002135064,0.0032944083,0.008204954,0.00086612726,0.00006112083,0.000047686728,0.63317585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000017464754,0.5888446,0.00016145423,0.011741127,0.00065088744,0.000042539974,0.00019401319,0.000017166325,0.39833078],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719447,0.00029859698,0.0007007,0.00026945284,0.0011544998,0.0003822578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779683,0.00027833483,0.0006275075,0.0005567979,0.0006222847,0.00011822829],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016238277,0.00028456483,0.0008029798,0.00014394327,0.00024780628,0.0002459954,0.0009743304,0.00043241953,0.01772197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010220632,0.00025242183,0.00020399748,0.0006364446,0.000098194425,0.00071863295,0.00011239088,0.0004749471,0.5399877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.892461e-7,0.000005247446,5.18178e-7,0.0036757807,0.000010681681,3.4615147e-7,0.00024277269,0.0000023263146,8.158551e-8,0.00016918844,0.85587454,0.14001752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005279491,0.000014304758,0.000017941491,0.012547185,0.000055898352,5.18984e-7,0.00014326569,6.8426374e-7,1.9875041e-7,0.00004565388,0.986823,0.00029855836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002176691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034575256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52226573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017970917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014059934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233979168","doi":"10.1177/153124450404200301","title":"Oh, Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.021145985572955488,"score_gpt":0.2626860896194885,"score_spread":0.24154010404653303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233979168","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007330118,0.9331936,0.000040091632,0.0071716122,0.00049600936,0.0009911157,0.00021733236,0.00023946747,0.050320655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36073315,0.48041084,0.0033737111,0.14719166,0.00079748797,0.00036752986,0.00039325483,0.00058440724,0.006147954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984702,0.00006279902,0.00033913212,0.00025686197,0.0005155915,0.00035545754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990134,0.000025811425,0.000111825335,0.0005550309,0.000116331576,0.00017754817],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037211677,0.00019415346,0.000418894,0.000023995754,0.00006544916,0.0000142014005,0.00031824582,0.000032217074,0.0003366172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015477571,0.00016774962,0.00009052022,0.00042222987,0.000029385936,0.000078124714,0.000044943623,0.0001754418,0.009952822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002365854,0.000043495205,0.00017029351,0.0018324028,0.00004177865,0.00016054387,0.000011809149,0.000038231432,0.00050143804,0.002164911,0.9841886,0.010844095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021980572,0.000011686838,0.0052938624,0.0047229375,0.000073224524,0.000023248613,0.000005640955,8.6860285e-7,0.00003328084,0.000100735175,0.9893024,0.0002123259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6690427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68541336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45278275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074123114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014145795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241430101","doi":"10.1177/153124450404200307","title":"Elijah and Ishmael: Assessing Cultural Identity in Canadian Child Custody Decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.055573893221110914,"score_gpt":0.3959579417072403,"score_spread":0.3403840484861294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241430101","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38346058,0.49341342,0.000020898528,0.05551385,0.00068309763,0.0014498675,0.000021506323,0.00010856522,0.06532822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71377224,0.28251365,0.00038915288,0.0030271332,0.00013635814,0.000027122374,0.0000067930155,0.000008547198,0.00011900378],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981801,0.00019012102,0.00032999192,0.0002920744,0.00044734654,0.00056038226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914527,0.0000933146,0.00008729948,0.00013689723,0.00016159107,0.0003756114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011063672,0.00016915024,0.00039390847,0.000052866755,0.0012681982,0.00026243296,0.00027967998,0.00010599753,0.00004898443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016753826,0.00013061357,0.000095677635,0.0006313692,0.00025273647,0.0010200865,0.00007443868,0.00029769767,0.00010252791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011737309,0.0005678899,0.21811153,0.0026534905,0.0004089423,0.0006221066,0.111159995,0.00011911694,0.00023467302,0.14703712,0.1446742,0.3743992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002419554,0.000007750531,0.38714722,0.004803254,0.000050444145,0.0000039632214,0.005465226,0.0000017308139,6.175436e-7,0.0004975059,0.601495,0.0002853288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7619136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9034949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45682082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009332939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032888213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97540843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245888572","doi":"10.1177/153124450404200308","title":"Assessments for Postseparation Parenting Disputes in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Psychology; Criminology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06501038362968176,"score_gpt":0.42279650164150706,"score_spread":0.3577861180118253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245888572","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19007105,0.73021257,0.0015938058,0.06329589,0.0015753118,0.0050433283,0.00009039132,0.00005927717,0.008058345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8776049,0.10768525,0.0022759908,0.011644135,0.00024572588,0.00014121135,0.00018948605,0.000019303565,0.00019398174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988705,0.000034147444,0.00040778023,0.00018511427,0.00027864188,0.00022382996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935037,0.00011293465,0.00009143764,0.00017856168,0.00016236774,0.000104299696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052746857,0.0001000653,0.00034470108,0.000028817314,0.000044259425,0.000008199004,0.000064895605,0.000052255604,0.000017935245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003051848,0.00008513646,0.00005157068,0.00018099078,0.000007906984,0.00005111783,0.000015499967,0.00025464644,0.000005345868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001272022,0.000586769,0.36004978,0.120113865,0.00019747912,0.00035252707,0.0008474218,0.0001783646,0.00026904247,0.01284715,0.1592166,0.3452138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016801115,0.0002746565,0.13154033,0.021423146,0.00020293359,0.000018002966,0.00023710732,0.0002605309,0.00002255387,0.0006014311,0.8434216,0.0003176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54020417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4734379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68753386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006559577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031014706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5501876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247836551","doi":"10.1177/1531244503252143","title":"Family/Child Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR): An Overview of One Canadian Court’s Settlement Conference Approach to the Pretrial Resolution of Family and Child Welfare/Protection Matters","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Child protection; Dispute resolution; Law; Family court; Family law; Resolution (logic); Welfare; Political science; Child custody; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.11223655617372083,"score_gpt":0.3229660813699467,"score_spread":0.21072952519622587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247836551","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038276862,0.5894052,0.0032987066,0.23996662,0.0031108002,0.023472935,0.0014410713,0.0002421804,0.100785635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82709813,0.1665933,0.0012728979,0.004231859,0.00035505494,0.00028856532,0.00007384432,0.000030482232,0.00005586806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582314,0.0013220579,0.000785253,0.00051491364,0.0009765173,0.0005781393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983603,0.00005204702,0.0004461895,0.00039344098,0.00042694173,0.00032107654],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028995718,0.0003007652,0.000748064,0.00009493141,0.0016052858,0.000066780536,0.00040251558,0.00017623643,0.000023268942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050884107,0.00023422702,0.00016484976,0.0007304125,0.00042892585,0.00026426735,0.00008012839,0.0003494825,0.000008933333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007433411,0.002432687,0.002560361,0.02057766,0.0021414922,0.0000110033825,0.074127644,0.001112255,0.0017982794,0.49032176,0.22555427,0.17861925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006494283,0.00026380343,0.1021715,0.004503457,0.00034085618,0.000002443489,0.0049556033,0.00012946187,0.000012584884,0.0001051533,0.88637865,0.0004870574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27882722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10673365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7888213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000528274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023708871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251305574","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2003.tb00901.x","title":"THE BOOKSHELF","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03815703054621018,"score_gpt":0.32618589465712,"score_spread":0.28802886411090983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251305574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040032336,0.39659274,0.00012464165,0.009459949,0.00072927354,0.00041434952,0.0000014618563,0.00004712463,0.59223014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03809001,0.9299007,0.0003024792,0.004764243,0.00010620806,0.000047689467,0.0000023024652,0.000013482851,0.02677289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987026,0.00044916885,0.00019676845,0.00011718185,0.00029215327,0.00024212038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992204,0.00031282747,0.00006521931,0.00023277587,0.000088290595,0.00008050055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022851217,0.00007218145,0.00012435019,0.000012069805,0.0012159654,0.000065439206,0.00022820468,0.000056649955,0.00005892524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007473019,0.000045292843,0.00009655373,0.00023141726,0.00018057755,0.000053981155,0.000012178627,0.00016462433,0.00037166436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1190035e-7,0.000011070643,0.0005301559,0.000057923102,0.000011655625,0.0000015812321,0.00023794649,0.0000010831238,0.0000027199187,0.84653836,0.13785504,0.01475213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032635384,0.000004310908,0.0012418232,0.00031272226,0.000019648336,5.7119075e-7,0.00037028227,0.000007259591,1.09786534e-7,0.004251523,0.99368715,0.00007194469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010835492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023879696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85583216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052931624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021269702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93523455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282968125","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12653","title":"In search of interdisciplinary, holistic and culturally informed services: The case of racialized immigrant women experiencing domestic violence in Ontario","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Sheridan College; Home and Community Care Support Services; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Domestic violence; Psychological intervention; Politics; Gender studies; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Nursing; Law; Social science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.0380522462476321,"score_gpt":0.3796454740467274,"score_spread":0.3415932277990953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282968125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828744,0.013578773,0.00000450101,0.0001185032,0.00012800307,0.0007824785,0.000010917144,0.0000069126677,0.002495516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800214,0.019169698,0.000042534142,0.00043756046,0.000009763799,0.00025563713,0.0000034578661,0.000005604111,0.00005431146],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794316,0.00047370978,0.00064573484,0.00021224961,0.00036365242,0.0003615186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916416,0.00026326298,0.00018743452,0.00022270365,0.000095848714,0.000066590794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024313766,0.00013292019,0.00049141014,0.000101436446,0.00030177477,0.000020626083,0.0004535852,0.00003503863,0.000163002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008635167,0.00009690167,0.000060240207,0.00064636074,0.0003109183,0.00021016112,0.00047695258,0.00033168084,0.0000024042668],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014792704,0.00016944246,0.008367935,0.003988273,0.000021536543,0.0006146015,0.97309834,0.0001990733,0.00032914363,0.00334737,0.00011889907,0.009597467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015973354,0.00040484127,0.11886792,0.018071964,0.00007167522,0.00025217605,0.8493933,0.00079454924,0.000016674567,0.002099947,0.007815759,0.0006138252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32345903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13908033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18437871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000526527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053638406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8766292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283389650","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12656","title":"A three‐factor ethical reasoning model for court‐involved practitioners: Services, roles, and values","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Service (business); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Mental health; Political science; Law; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.14473066379222171,"score_gpt":0.4755129779907212,"score_spread":0.33078231419849946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283389650","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004593008,0.5439564,0.08962088,0.33543447,0.0025780357,0.011344907,0.0009746376,0.00076902634,0.010728654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04891175,0.36250114,0.06999931,0.5072316,0.0012906458,0.007337454,0.00070723257,0.00028523844,0.0017356535],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933536,0.0031658728,0.00096795143,0.00064129627,0.0012260791,0.0006451679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883998,0.009260108,0.0007728763,0.0006653105,0.0005591646,0.00034274557],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015298993,0.0002934836,0.0007458999,0.00006589621,0.0031849185,0.000027384202,0.00048371826,0.0005538523,0.0005147658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007815477,0.00026793944,0.00014359353,0.00025925232,0.00014565904,0.00029738116,0.00059273094,0.010265393,0.00008111859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031993777,0.00042768603,0.0024920143,0.063521706,0.0003595214,0.000034367993,0.00878713,0.00017100513,0.00022541337,0.10782282,0.8029424,0.012895987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014044155,0.0001822113,0.0007511825,0.013930453,0.0005464616,0.000012541588,0.0057278257,0.12773322,4.049051e-7,0.044229027,0.80494833,0.0005339395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002536793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003320948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18145524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033400644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010726465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296259834","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12679","title":"Are separated/divorced same sex families more likely to establish equal coparenting? A preliminary outcome from a <scp>court‐based</scp> program","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Coparenting; Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Child custody; Developmental psychology; Family court; Exploratory analysis; Exploratory research; Queer; Specialty; Social psychology; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06422227155853957,"score_gpt":0.3589954102109187,"score_spread":0.2947731386523791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296259834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77328783,0.16508782,0.0010498828,0.019006783,0.0043233964,0.013010572,0.0024910427,0.0022722534,0.0194704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9139465,0.019503204,0.0068774913,0.038902804,0.0008234888,0.0049844785,0.0014304392,0.00026489227,0.013266681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939271,0.0012048658,0.0011076741,0.0009571428,0.0017410717,0.0010621153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996444,0.0010931598,0.0007695828,0.00078395644,0.0003777978,0.00053150556],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024136205,0.00051922305,0.0010655978,0.00026597182,0.0019860337,0.0003457676,0.00124575,0.00022759751,0.00015894316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017898652,0.0005102037,0.00045733308,0.0020551456,0.00028309098,0.00028309986,0.0005521517,0.0010235634,0.0002146219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004980299,0.0014894806,0.24349813,0.0021922232,0.00035648257,0.0003688142,0.020124251,0.007249761,0.000053927964,0.0016670146,0.6805526,0.042397495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004887409,0.0003328714,0.08898185,0.0017205459,0.00034111398,0.0000030415026,0.020831972,0.004418097,8.649883e-7,0.0002582692,0.88218296,0.0004396677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003479359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20163035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050598383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000668283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311454691","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12684","title":"The polyamorous threat to nonmarriage","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; General partnership; Context (archaeology); Property (philosophy); Commission; Political science; Family law; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Geography","score_opus":0.05716655578579146,"score_gpt":0.3631655010110989,"score_spread":0.30599894522530746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311454691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046931584,0.36663947,0.00011360144,0.10539754,0.0019368106,0.0021039566,0.00002652487,0.00012110067,0.5189678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3533545,0.4018074,0.00033633527,0.09602955,0.0014174926,0.0018338069,0.000063855274,0.00006819912,0.14508887],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786484,0.00077666837,0.0002347145,0.00018132548,0.0006366488,0.00030581158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889123,0.000500064,0.00006848984,0.00034094247,0.000054232507,0.00014502165],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030339006,0.0000874756,0.00017287994,0.000024350287,0.0030182851,0.00007009161,0.000559955,0.000025466918,0.0016110077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007955285,0.00006459312,0.00008761202,0.0005436665,0.000060896044,0.00006279451,0.0001627228,0.000250979,0.0003957351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058152636,0.000024228399,0.0003516707,0.00004517932,0.000014911796,0.000013347925,0.002959025,0.000005907905,0.00000951914,0.03722336,0.8008922,0.15845484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038470902,0.000032443088,0.0010738925,0.00006191147,0.000022319671,0.0000012341618,0.0024500308,0.0000022099764,2.1544284e-7,0.00065430737,0.99556994,0.00009303312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010164902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011350667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.373879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014230354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020090533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322764587","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12715","title":"A survey of mothers' experiences of shared parenting and domestic violence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Manitoba; University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Coparenting; Domestic violence; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Anxiety; Developmental psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Psychiatry; Medicine; Environmental health; Geography","score_opus":0.0687003093350203,"score_gpt":0.3804215828180953,"score_spread":0.311721273483075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322764587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8291865,0.1582354,0.00007981057,0.000061793806,0.00037756495,0.0006719402,0.00005151341,0.00009152296,0.011243974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82440376,0.17530364,0.00008160683,0.00009489226,0.000014166695,0.00003858234,0.0000074243317,0.000006279369,0.00004962405],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983719,0.0003516316,0.00041575075,0.00021415607,0.00038416625,0.0002623778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889547,0.00040980495,0.00021454328,0.00018458805,0.00022496108,0.00007062405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025095246,0.00010407259,0.00041236705,0.00006032952,0.00013014101,0.000017600445,0.00030678313,0.00004842376,0.00008172209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010491536,0.00008997026,0.000058563255,0.0008878269,0.00040284538,0.00011881992,0.00007265405,0.00006417036,0.000030544394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006798137,0.00035958877,0.34116793,0.022566544,0.00021218904,0.000060168382,0.24989149,0.000031915704,0.0025928635,0.009873827,0.03167891,0.3414966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020741354,0.000087301894,0.93303365,0.024629531,0.000070061484,0.0000013809763,0.037392285,0.00045065198,0.000050576127,0.0003193195,0.0033792628,0.00037857328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020805374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034695116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5918657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011815401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013308568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36688805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323849814","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12716","title":"The use of parental alienation constructs by family justice system professionals: A survey of belief systems and practice implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Alienation; Psychological intervention; Phenomenon; Psychology; Family law; Family court; Quality (philosophy); Economic Justice; Criminology; Social psychology; Public relations; Law; Political science; Psychiatry; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16363727626971855,"score_gpt":0.39627285765925985,"score_spread":0.2326355813895413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323849814","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0869372,0.8630403,0.0009851558,0.019494873,0.0039004048,0.009212294,0.003962939,0.00035711902,0.012109695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74154216,0.25703707,0.00018296922,0.00030388642,0.000029700192,0.00013729118,0.00021595432,0.0000171008,0.00053385954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962133,0.002157059,0.00067797943,0.00020919454,0.00053258426,0.00020987717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909964,0.0069387173,0.00067722367,0.00028792833,0.00101548,0.00008422407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052174237,0.00011390224,0.0003632154,0.000054157328,0.0007496499,0.0000677928,0.00022914544,0.00011011703,6.63603e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004112426,0.000081057806,0.00006367393,0.0009846656,0.00035381992,0.0002535413,0.000070266215,0.00014323984,0.00001149967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004695263,0.00030449533,0.01477858,0.013523904,0.0011012038,0.000003442563,0.0033022747,0.00017838189,0.00071422063,0.47180888,0.48574564,0.008492044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005601304,0.00010264581,0.40333375,0.011324611,0.0045963475,0.00002241244,0.06242851,0.0052854638,0.0000012271332,0.00011931191,0.51160544,0.00062016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004657925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027400214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.654605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070255504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035421466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70414203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386543603","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12757","title":"Guest editors' introduction to the 2023 special issue on parenting plan evaluations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Support in Illness","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Citation; Commons; Plan (archaeology); History; Operations research; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06020623463012873,"score_gpt":0.37339416723758,"score_spread":0.31318793260745126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386543603","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003359646,0.0075815027,0.000036291378,0.5076728,0.30067915,0.0049104933,0.00015769305,0.0007361192,0.1748663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016042594,0.03323636,0.00007367343,0.0076241596,0.93833077,0.0005000633,0.0002604699,0.000047171492,0.018323071],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997008,0.00055592315,0.00040712408,0.00040401466,0.0011660822,0.00045881534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861246,0.0003699611,0.0001347604,0.0005110288,0.00023353174,0.00013827198],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046353154,0.00016252192,0.00028229484,0.00010667958,0.0010224885,0.000112685855,0.0005513102,0.00008313096,0.0014521586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030374883,0.00012596612,0.000113429436,0.0017427453,0.000101854974,0.00014967617,0.00009775102,0.00025617488,0.018789463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020426796,0.000016368478,0.00012579352,0.000073136514,0.000009881152,0.000002527119,0.0011428266,0.00003301912,0.00000616988,0.00052047276,0.9668725,0.031195262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000445364,0.000026655895,0.0038309966,0.00064204616,0.00005015868,4.4041775e-7,0.0021918118,0.000007702249,0.0000030215704,0.000073330804,0.9929687,0.00016060156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005308915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073970575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6376516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017061089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023090246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386571517","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12759","title":"Judicial decision‐making in family court involving children with autism spectrum disorder","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family and Disability Support Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Education and Early Childhood Development; Western University; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Family court; Autism spectrum disorder; Psychology; Autism; Child custody; Population; Primary care; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine; Family medicine; Law; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.04299786096445341,"score_gpt":0.3688567475752022,"score_spread":0.3258588866107488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386571517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8368591,0.1350823,0.000393521,0.007972102,0.0009568201,0.002749313,0.00008265172,0.00045227358,0.015451904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95122683,0.04193608,0.00032789883,0.0050178156,0.00021298895,0.00040748075,0.00015204414,0.00012223945,0.00059660536],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949133,0.00051964563,0.0010244735,0.0011316187,0.0010684718,0.0013424939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741954,0.0008267436,0.00018402583,0.001268424,0.000066091576,0.0002352085],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027183932,0.00049598573,0.0010453098,0.00045536677,0.00025260408,0.00008600047,0.0008435468,0.00029208124,0.0015158734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040021978,0.00041425688,0.00025283042,0.0026021432,0.00028966303,0.00023696003,0.00032732636,0.001037996,0.0041327965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001468171,0.0004349536,0.7048296,0.00054532854,0.00016696728,0.000310968,0.00080557104,0.00003577998,0.000023735196,0.0029953723,0.19328344,0.096421525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009459214,0.00019923328,0.96621555,0.005197385,0.00007029929,0.000031442934,0.0008759629,0.000081134145,3.3353524e-7,0.0025922775,0.023280775,0.000509669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002223755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001289879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.261386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018931653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030390444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389569375","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12768","title":"Engaging fathers who commit family violence: Issues and challenges for family courts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Domestic violence; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Accountability; Masculinity; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.10965329013690304,"score_gpt":0.38517374517421604,"score_spread":0.275520455037313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389569375","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012727099,0.9117415,0.00019736175,0.007236089,0.0010141752,0.0023436686,0.00009426552,0.00066697947,0.063978836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040739164,0.95203584,0.00041199877,0.0050211195,0.00041707442,0.00036976676,0.000027772441,0.000059847047,0.0009174064],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962392,0.00055885385,0.000623086,0.00075122784,0.00078972155,0.0010379079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791265,0.0006906097,0.00021274907,0.0005264358,0.00036133252,0.00029622208],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046028523,0.00042338416,0.0009164002,0.00016281498,0.0011555554,0.00015990177,0.0007160264,0.00022482954,0.000024639556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045533638,0.00039602473,0.0002502143,0.00053729577,0.0005029383,0.00036086878,0.00016669313,0.00035523868,0.00034181547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032461718,0.000112662594,0.0010060194,0.0074973395,0.00016319951,0.00004209123,0.010175368,0.000011910362,0.000520925,0.062249888,0.24398105,0.6742071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033846786,0.00009354327,0.026093494,0.010794469,0.0001310621,0.0000014330018,0.0134261055,0.00027255225,0.000007751043,0.0029774664,0.94526255,0.0006011074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075474894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027729611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7012815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009848198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020258404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389766597","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12770","title":"Defining points and transformative turns in family violence, parenting and coparenting disputes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coparenting; Transformative learning; Domestic violence; Psychology; SAFER; Social psychology; Criminology; Poison control; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Computer security; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.030887422729699094,"score_gpt":0.3412734739194597,"score_spread":0.31038605118976065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389766597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58259505,0.34616068,0.00016207628,0.00090493006,0.0005211937,0.0013728243,0.000078813675,0.00031809186,0.06788633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5775334,0.4212997,0.00021001449,0.000815583,0.000030117475,0.000049241455,0.000015418096,0.000011807987,0.00003470662],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783057,0.00030896405,0.0005196657,0.00036358586,0.00037541232,0.00060177955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991487,0.00036874742,0.00013190434,0.00013051192,0.00008141868,0.00013867141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025030584,0.00020695997,0.00047129035,0.00014621408,0.00039170665,0.00011640819,0.00020471601,0.00008366379,0.000012118354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000340886,0.00019107806,0.00006515138,0.0008715348,0.0002567874,0.00041696394,0.00009868425,0.00026050277,0.00009624746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002578596,0.00011081843,0.24465731,0.010235434,0.00008338738,0.00011452338,0.05420256,0.000011166992,0.0002863806,0.077634946,0.009149382,0.6034883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007051982,0.00006195224,0.8503702,0.051841374,0.0001197738,0.000006322944,0.032929085,0.0014075846,0.000011592925,0.004330116,0.057332758,0.00088402117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008070829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014694179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6057129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040856026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091169546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7791937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400098981","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12796","title":"A collaborative approach to develop indigenous specific parenting education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Psychology; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Criminology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.030553675903195923,"score_gpt":0.3441045795607431,"score_spread":0.3135509036575472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400098981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0112625975,0.48684466,0.00058015884,0.0014663357,0.0033122317,0.0034280946,0.0000156738,0.00019093325,0.49289933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011397496,0.9589657,0.0062115393,0.001366101,0.0019290207,0.00014683127,0.00011527388,0.000038388032,0.019829635],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978278,0.00042090038,0.00041917682,0.00040591758,0.0004376319,0.0004885321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985347,0.00010320064,0.00009465799,0.00022483505,0.00080395286,0.00023864643],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001968045,0.00016359163,0.00028965122,0.00014732522,0.0029701805,0.00021517772,0.00029311804,0.00009870218,0.00006865264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030072584,0.0001336795,0.000052126852,0.002867735,0.000070279086,0.00021091998,0.0000027186409,0.00019031075,0.00091371534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001903194,0.00023562051,0.00006337408,0.002719484,0.0000289721,0.0000020970228,0.718516,8.128587e-7,0.000002105551,0.13708514,0.079532,0.06181252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015988211,0.000014316967,0.00045349877,0.0024250192,0.000026142023,0.0000022170045,0.009959316,7.694912e-7,0.0000023730206,0.00022347305,0.98668736,0.00018954594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008835975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022258349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90715533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005897472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05844271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401002424","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12801","title":"Educating for change: A meta‐analysis of education programs for separating and divorcing parents","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Psychology; Medical education; Meta-analysis; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.23448553269759304,"score_gpt":0.4575250408737663,"score_spread":0.22303950817617324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401002424","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008592743,0.9775391,0.0029925383,0.0048136637,0.0007651688,0.0037522898,0.00005315076,0.000060622293,0.001430673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85676396,0.12003032,0.014401813,0.0010427734,0.0004796796,0.005531732,0.00033700155,0.000038269915,0.0013744553],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989908,0.0000999826,0.00033161716,0.0002340255,0.00016413805,0.00017946336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990659,0.00041300367,0.00014219528,0.000113522074,0.00020382769,0.000061603765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016679008,0.00010014079,0.00047662947,0.00012739711,0.00030192503,0.000092549155,0.000099675664,0.00005845277,0.0000055648397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025642282,0.00008079238,0.00045213103,0.000838683,0.00005278423,0.0001417429,0.000017702347,0.00006543159,9.4303e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058015626,0.00031126314,0.008128853,0.028660184,0.038810357,2.9200368e-7,0.02838233,0.000029039129,0.000038838112,0.09786432,0.007957372,0.7898114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020017369,0.00015653786,0.0044715395,0.011085684,0.35700867,0.0000010726669,0.019248413,0.058775827,0.0000013649493,0.006059507,0.5421693,0.00082194986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006918207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005244914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85750884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041893087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027376265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32946175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402275693","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12824","title":"October 2024","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.057209854934933226,"score_gpt":0.416520463790794,"score_spread":0.35931060885586075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402275693","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002770674,0.8261974,0.000042209656,0.044505257,0.0014088606,0.00041345553,0.000010891337,0.00012983065,0.12701502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020259317,0.89428025,0.00041276705,0.024776917,0.0014076056,0.00004444614,0.000031913572,0.000038498954,0.058748297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873513,0.00005644056,0.0003409861,0.00028022882,0.0003606997,0.00022650503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915797,0.00014046156,0.000022248942,0.00035498038,0.0001314197,0.00019294761],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008206802,0.00013650925,0.00038587587,0.000059866015,0.000036914415,0.000029330266,0.00008136169,0.0001302608,0.0020953352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023029509,0.00009776299,0.000175935,0.0004317995,0.000033646556,0.00004961503,0.000035867975,0.0008155009,0.0023543015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002012358,0.00001663272,0.00017404808,0.02746014,0.00003296254,0.00021283045,0.000074387746,4.0929944e-8,0.000014671896,0.0034089119,0.9011192,0.067484185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005959484,0.00006700523,0.00068940007,0.016690074,0.00023483598,0.000072290706,0.000013652945,0.000046449077,0.0000014023187,0.00022066386,0.9818049,0.00009969818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007803375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027754568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08068575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000673786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036998218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402416649","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12819","title":"Exploring litigation abuse in Ontario: An analysis of costs decisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Criminology; Business; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.3093681621485638,"score_gpt":0.44585235867958023,"score_spread":0.13648419653101646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402416649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8984691,0.02871042,0.00036474902,0.019331792,0.0012772193,0.0006301622,0.000017017195,0.0000981045,0.051101465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9060091,0.09125521,0.0005695548,0.0012432914,0.000052405696,0.000089461355,0.000070321694,0.0000065768377,0.00070410495],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880916,0.00023089943,0.00037955065,0.00016236857,0.00030337015,0.00011465389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894136,0.00051929214,0.000077275006,0.00019639752,0.00019909056,0.00006655562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017746809,0.000059200825,0.00020814448,0.00035835794,0.00009965831,0.00010611178,0.00014094982,0.000032566593,0.00066609785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080592255,0.000056260516,0.000087937915,0.003490597,0.000038705293,0.0013926756,0.000007473344,0.0002470103,0.000058331683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100905945,0.00060649775,0.04462666,0.0005325046,0.00053897576,0.000021117306,0.20365544,0.00017465392,0.00018140805,0.33724913,0.01972815,0.39267537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002434443,0.000009059908,0.107713416,0.0018434235,0.0003405222,1.6118659e-7,0.0031933687,0.000112669026,0.0000014874198,0.00015789496,0.8865225,0.00008118752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26045913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59160936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8667943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004044607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010206695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74446553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405963121","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12840","title":"Embracing Neurodivergence: Essential considerations in family law practice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Langley Environmental Partners Society; Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Neurotypical; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Stigma (botany); Presentation (obstetrics); Social psychology; Public relations; Internet privacy; Sociology; Political science; Developmental psychology; Autism; Computer science; Medicine; Social science; Autism spectrum disorder","score_opus":0.05977757176808055,"score_gpt":0.3733857007252274,"score_spread":0.31360812895714685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405963121","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008463651,0.548838,0.00065465725,0.12853406,0.0030462623,0.003077122,0.000088897476,0.00072398986,0.30657336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81707996,0.15421982,0.00022497641,0.027686507,0.00012919023,0.00014754539,0.000005608422,0.000052892643,0.0004535068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965375,0.00077125995,0.0005683627,0.00081476406,0.0007817913,0.00052631437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979212,0.0013332074,0.000078864716,0.000508873,0.00003552261,0.00012232666],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009100731,0.00023571326,0.00036283254,0.00016247177,0.00025151874,0.0003343685,0.0003307917,0.0000714464,0.00038812796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023290988,0.00022292929,0.00012744796,0.0011407471,0.00018598579,0.0009382803,0.000220287,0.00081142486,0.0022900277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012798905,0.00019792965,0.000016204174,0.0026577404,0.000013441394,0.0023186805,0.00033387484,0.000060328886,0.055304974,0.8916742,0.04454125,0.002868561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004348483,0.00014275595,0.0013448932,0.0077225906,0.00016199425,0.0005400595,0.00012827934,0.0022617495,0.003561713,0.03452994,0.9483138,0.0008574239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035998473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006295629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90377253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088582834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038153632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406245872","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12842","title":"Consideration of culture in Canadian courtrooms: Before and after the Divorce Act amendments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous culture; Child custody; Law; Competence (human resources); Cultural heritage; Culturally appropriate; Psychology; Cultural competence; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.022894550715127047,"score_gpt":0.3387061541134731,"score_spread":0.3158116033983461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406245872","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23781687,0.43389574,0.000058556703,0.07467649,0.0006796362,0.003452009,0.000062895684,0.000029025456,0.24932878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957899,0.035806935,0.000022927998,0.0044393963,0.000023341017,0.000040026007,0.000009060704,0.0000020959753,0.0017572175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915725,0.00024142093,0.00019695498,0.00010195903,0.00014646746,0.00015595094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996131,0.00009192297,0.000049674498,0.00011261679,0.0000661022,0.000066595545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008724268,0.00006188274,0.00015386805,0.00004285448,0.00019280244,0.00003134446,0.00009015062,0.00006405625,0.00010847872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045431,0.000042230058,0.00002613662,0.00024655214,0.000104419756,0.00008580127,0.000015102089,0.00012501153,0.0000051441193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021000855,0.000064840955,0.60757816,0.0018024354,0.000100094105,0.00002747956,0.036778722,0.000004575266,0.000030440851,0.1064927,0.18322754,0.06387201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012750606,0.000016963706,0.12602922,0.0020951936,0.000059516697,4.2166445e-7,0.0021828562,0.000019303805,0.0000010344687,0.0029468897,0.8664397,0.000081391576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08819778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80040735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7200821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009061578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042974128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.917874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411732146","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70001","title":"“Parental alienation” cases: Experiences of Ontario legal and mental health professionals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Mental health; Health professionals; Psychology; Psychiatry; Criminology; Political science; Law; Health care","score_opus":0.031374619939339064,"score_gpt":0.3722264591293611,"score_spread":0.34085183919002204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411732146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5368416,0.35946718,0.00007603594,0.037845124,0.0024195428,0.0024368023,0.000046088026,0.000058857346,0.06080879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9032076,0.075011514,0.0006013268,0.006076155,0.000037941405,0.00010812243,0.000054584834,0.0000064081723,0.01489633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874854,0.00021652153,0.00037246195,0.00017607611,0.00031815938,0.0001682576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948204,0.00010289221,0.00015626352,0.000103852384,0.00007867107,0.00007627717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008975022,0.00008825476,0.0002699406,0.00005797741,0.0005765562,0.000027250773,0.00014115433,0.000053048647,0.00008430808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001001519,0.00007167172,0.000061692444,0.00026535479,0.00020667349,0.00015030538,0.00005249222,0.00012152934,0.0000038371204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002107024,0.0005700268,0.040559918,0.0027420067,0.0001252043,0.000008947998,0.277599,0.00000324524,0.000017755961,0.29027689,0.35607404,0.032001905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019108488,0.00004717796,0.017441317,0.0052736164,0.000020180365,0.0000027276278,0.059867248,0.00002685993,8.765239e-7,0.00024337583,0.9167508,0.00013477344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027185226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03319199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56067675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029417046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020477627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98444974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411891855","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70002","title":"Appropriate parenting arrangements in cases of intimate partner violence and coercive control: From research and legislative reform to changes in practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Western University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Domestic violence; Psychology; Control (management); Criminology; Political science; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Law; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency; Economics","score_opus":0.08372236204773302,"score_gpt":0.43959303848143705,"score_spread":0.355870676433704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411891855","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39816874,0.4250473,0.0003277137,0.008689092,0.0005859831,0.0071312007,0.00014684678,0.00006795227,0.15983513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74049705,0.25750685,0.0004204923,0.0012851004,0.000025847781,0.00019049854,0.000004672783,0.000006782827,0.00006267251],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975063,0.00077634177,0.00043686238,0.0004188311,0.00042508345,0.00043653266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982951,0.0008965467,0.00014586236,0.00020419019,0.00037698366,0.00008130178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044763684,0.00014622773,0.0005171608,0.00021906519,0.00016850689,0.000055401957,0.0002282996,0.00007893439,0.000008700503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015516536,0.00012803118,0.000022309365,0.0007777146,0.0003252129,0.00027625877,0.00018043777,0.00028301234,0.00000834408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010961478,0.0009705797,0.20267412,0.0070856884,0.00033499382,0.00028664264,0.05519537,0.00001601523,0.0022454767,0.055847835,0.0036747535,0.6705724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003962111,0.000702531,0.4829141,0.22298895,0.0004060564,0.0000037555633,0.077359594,0.0006592639,0.00037902585,0.013696799,0.19562364,0.001304201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027325176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032485519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6692682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014939067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012728562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97915196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414925403","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70020","title":"Developing a formal model of peer support for bereaved military families: A co‐production and evidence‐based approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer support; Grounded theory; Narrative; Process (computing); Grief; Peer review; Technical peer review; Social support","score_opus":0.1575939744729757,"score_gpt":0.41264532237837565,"score_spread":0.25505134790539996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414925403","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08801342,0.60366964,0.2565869,0.012798749,0.0021441982,0.013982665,0.00038687253,0.00021361047,0.022203945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.513106,0.32416454,0.09542957,0.043579724,0.00028826363,0.0045096,0.0009180637,0.000119493205,0.01788477],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979117,0.00012289188,0.0007422693,0.0005242448,0.00027511967,0.00042378932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884695,0.00013620386,0.00017149867,0.00046101908,0.00029810148,0.00008622657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001991376,0.00023717857,0.0006224724,0.00013464737,0.00014667706,0.0000059936815,0.00017861788,0.00011371761,0.000019054987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020121728,0.00020989693,0.00014430303,0.00024488912,0.00010252737,0.00020513368,0.000047397963,0.00014636133,0.000007876452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013150465,0.0013914526,0.0065951888,0.26134267,0.0006933927,0.0000045070014,0.004703389,0.00016010564,0.0016205559,0.0373008,0.5318319,0.15304096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018029893,0.005092385,0.08198928,0.2683738,0.0056801606,0.00012440834,0.027264785,0.037549186,0.0031247102,0.0074759233,0.53995806,0.005337434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021207485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002360159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42509255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013168227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004898683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85593486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414976091","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70025","title":"The family experience of the Invictus Games through a work family conflict lens: An interpretative phenomenological analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Workaholism, burnout, and well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretative phenomenological analysis; Work–family conflict; Inclusion (mineral); Selection (genetic algorithm); Family conflict; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04989425899837327,"score_gpt":0.36568738814648305,"score_spread":0.31579312914810975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414976091","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25603756,0.6130924,0.0028216955,0.0021207456,0.0013968031,0.0014058517,0.000024830697,0.00011798817,0.12298211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85038316,0.12320798,0.00017047995,0.024231348,0.00008583344,0.00039082687,0.000012091721,0.000028110695,0.0014901464],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955112,0.0014509083,0.0011572522,0.000792096,0.00044070598,0.0006478889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963335,0.0009541471,0.000533997,0.0018593535,0.00024368461,0.00007532743],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010516422,0.0004611822,0.0012270664,0.000110708796,0.00041286962,0.00008928738,0.0016892985,0.00021604323,0.00012988654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027689742,0.00025517642,0.0007087047,0.0028013818,0.00093079143,0.0001887889,0.0003236871,0.0006570949,0.00007863978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000794552,0.0014845653,0.041496355,0.001483288,0.011724394,0.00009620894,0.29465583,0.00013572027,0.0013473806,0.14212489,0.13977465,0.36488214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006478788,0.00021659867,0.22699936,0.0051543964,0.002397926,0.0000042067213,0.038109288,0.00007106968,0.000024098463,0.0021367236,0.7236045,0.0006339288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031806307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019262226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5943456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008745007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010963669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415098202","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70023","title":"Strengthening military and veteran couple relationships: A rapid review of the effectiveness of relationship education for military couples","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relationship education; Military service; Military personnel; Value (mathematics); Service member; Military organization","score_opus":0.055035253349454125,"score_gpt":0.34385387038758125,"score_spread":0.2888186170381271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415098202","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025687853,0.96615785,0.00015963452,0.002183858,0.0003309156,0.0023631041,0.000035266243,0.000016119786,0.003065401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41487765,0.5837598,0.00028808595,0.00067806663,0.000031035765,0.00021072046,0.00003129053,0.000006595975,0.000116759744],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723464,0.0015712008,0.0005668248,0.00022390328,0.00025550928,0.00014790063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961991,0.002820725,0.0001644069,0.00035926024,0.00041089254,0.00004567161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056937984,0.00012626857,0.00044891168,0.000057690595,0.00040947326,0.000004320157,0.0002605747,0.00008376287,0.000014642698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044774357,0.00010140329,0.00020670462,0.0005267842,0.0002330582,0.00010925674,0.00004030879,0.00016971238,9.991661e-7],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013196563,0.00058513344,0.13613997,0.5302546,0.00034923208,2.9952517e-7,0.010274229,0.000013187281,0.00029319004,0.16400798,0.041009843,0.116940364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004794841,0.000087791654,0.4240593,0.23848706,0.0009849527,0.0000010702825,0.0040854374,0.00008376544,0.000022572489,0.0122899255,0.31912172,0.00029690642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084054517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020848025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38918978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057751637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007220253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5360232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415991347","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12794","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Chicago; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; Hamline University; San José State University; Arizona State University","keywords":"","score_opus":0.02369371920927582,"score_gpt":0.3023206595891107,"score_spread":0.2786269403798349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415991347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002488116,0.21144603,0.0019117937,0.0003302095,0.01281597,0.0006514572,0.000099876444,0.0001974056,0.77254474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000005055059,0.638081,0.000084852196,0.004444699,0.00090251694,0.00012755743,0.0021646216,0.000020970992,0.35416868],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885285,0.000056774246,0.0005329005,0.00011477884,0.00027749958,0.00016517917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993629,0.00002063287,0.000085915424,0.0003461437,0.00013283554,0.000051611758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029278395,0.0002612439,0.00047339304,0.00014942324,0.00004814769,0.000055430148,0.00019658923,0.00024711038,0.17092395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036056535,0.00025915343,0.0001376403,0.00019353985,0.000012574233,0.00024476665,0.000023417673,0.00037569925,0.7265007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.790903e-7,0.0000020750572,4.8605795e-8,0.012480218,0.00002231222,9.804505e-8,0.000029748895,0.00063506694,0.000004869431,7.5216934e-7,0.930186,0.05663855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007093728,0.0000060696148,0.000047371126,0.009899512,0.00008760338,5.471207e-7,0.00000849908,0.0008986887,0.0000010833187,0.000001999538,0.9887425,0.0002352357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.854919e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013450913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55557674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019311788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091095884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117124360","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70035","title":"New footprints on an old trail","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Field (mathematics); Family law; Publishing; Mental health; Learning disability","score_opus":0.08069392064567658,"score_gpt":0.44890399487255994,"score_spread":0.36821007422688334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117124360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006494237,0.011682776,0.00023257654,0.24940453,0.0010910776,0.00039116514,0.0000018475873,0.000080424375,0.73646617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.092290014,0.18114641,0.0039741616,0.35749233,0.0012795434,0.00013193916,0.00003714848,0.00002730423,0.36362115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990416,0.0002265324,0.00020471848,0.00016076757,0.00022263912,0.00014373046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927884,0.00016004032,0.00007277237,0.0002529712,0.00013566512,0.00009972997],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009902341,0.00006993342,0.00013700782,0.000056911824,0.00026972344,0.00010530755,0.0002484917,0.000051423733,0.0011498318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094414747,0.000064704334,0.000048093163,0.0007797142,0.000033004224,0.00028126486,0.000010942522,0.00023900715,0.0005273648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012866975,0.00004512419,0.00008968783,0.00006075668,0.000006705871,3.1690394e-7,0.00060599094,1.6486057e-7,0.0000070547185,0.32032055,0.43719575,0.24166663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057298563,0.0000127557205,0.005155923,0.00069384393,0.000024921606,1.0595184e-7,0.00040565865,5.7140903e-7,0.000002524216,0.0016974577,0.99188125,0.000067661706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032916823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005234074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55468553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079141224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013960523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117721721","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70048","title":"January Editorial Note","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.016524548138654747,"score_gpt":0.3669768116449299,"score_spread":0.3504522635062752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117721721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044442088,0.29252973,0.00013850431,0.037997298,0.05425648,0.0005507908,0.0000087732515,0.00008070165,0.6143933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077390317,0.8605691,0.00046876213,0.015108137,0.07463768,0.00012069795,0.000017390817,0.000013242769,0.041325923],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991169,0.00011495085,0.00017307456,0.00013241425,0.000286002,0.0001766321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950165,0.000108192,0.000039662566,0.00014923186,0.00015470498,0.00004656916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006109491,0.000069233705,0.00019496602,0.000023243145,0.00058082107,0.000027971411,0.00014452793,0.00006858684,0.00005738181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029866668,0.00005498548,0.00011196313,0.0003836713,0.00012265133,0.00007404473,0.000049373364,0.0001155979,0.0001231458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.668286e-7,0.000009164044,0.00003146492,0.00013805018,0.000010227401,0.0000011020253,0.00016816496,2.566335e-7,0.0000025171573,0.014652855,0.97056973,0.0144155845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006446237,0.000005291277,0.0006145833,0.00094749057,0.000055062163,6.1487846e-8,0.00011937594,0.0000012140979,3.0110658e-7,0.0005468768,0.9975819,0.00006339104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008575602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003026818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57306737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076496086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030614354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4467265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117722613","doi":"10.1111/fcre.70046","title":"Introduction: <scp> <i>Family court review</i> </scp> special feature on changeovers, choices, and challenges—Understanding children and young people's between‐home transitions after parental separation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Everyday life; Feature (linguistics); Work (physics); Window (computing); Life span; Connection (principal bundle); Ethnography","score_opus":0.03270032002812275,"score_gpt":0.29093760638504057,"score_spread":0.25823728635691784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117722613","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011757184,0.8740052,0.00017168146,0.0882833,0.0019009046,0.0024532427,0.00029501584,0.00011915483,0.021014303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07557393,0.91674536,0.00007323643,0.002617623,0.003105578,0.000116539595,0.00032217332,0.000024430086,0.001421138],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972877,0.000497836,0.00047656638,0.0006952777,0.0005925966,0.00045001082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887705,0.00026634897,0.00020312415,0.00032365476,0.00012897654,0.00020083414],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014201782,0.000363908,0.0007341667,0.00017553713,0.0010082403,0.00017173245,0.00019821763,0.00030964208,0.000025925425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018643952,0.0003435563,0.00017639287,0.0007406318,0.00025862068,0.00039092402,0.000057503108,0.00063754834,0.000023754761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020655925,0.00019279843,0.02895041,0.0066629886,0.0004223792,0.000009938365,0.0065564173,0.0000043539253,0.000011111819,0.044973686,0.8975053,0.014689992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047453016,0.00008193947,0.45900857,0.010319973,0.0007382241,0.000010418863,0.0022602186,0.000015527383,1.3966782e-7,0.0010384786,0.52578795,0.00026403723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014272067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020538298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43005815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034691155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015335293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}