{"meta":{"query_hash":"e99f91c72d90","filters":{"venue":"Family matters"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e99f91c72d90","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Family+matters"},"results":[{"id":"W2198074588","doi":"","title":"Family Trends: Changing Patterns of Partnering","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family matters","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remarriage; Cohabitation; Perspective (graphical); Project commissioning; Publishing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Focus (optics); Term (time); Gender studies; Demographic economics; Social science; Political science; Geography; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03885148743880314,"score_gpt":0.2915571658716168,"score_spread":0.25270567843281366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198074588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98359585,0.0037081947,0.00040287306,0.0034199806,0.000046068908,0.000011683678,0.00091021665,0.000020923873,0.007884194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968495,0.0015496127,0.00016803626,0.00018511101,0.000035811358,0.0000054853326,0.00037402014,0.0000055274745,0.00082691177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994617,0.00013449891,0.000055767097,0.00012777848,0.000120116805,0.000100171346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774075,0.00042689036,0.00089156756,0.00010865203,0.00057067315,0.00026150089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093924964,0.00006172519,0.00015656125,0.0014117903,0.00053621066,0.00089619565,0.00039429756,0.0006196765,0.0042293738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005014727,0.00009411825,0.0001487315,0.0022348769,0.0005469178,0.0016020973,0.00057752064,0.00057124544,0.00043223862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010140074,0.000045437133,0.92519295,0.00010445465,0.00005812114,0.00028062038,0.010749357,0.00014336077,0.0006935671,0.0026918303,0.0022495505,0.05768937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013147003,0.00005082063,0.9859724,0.000041340012,0.000008524041,0.00044796278,0.0073434757,0.00011623742,0.00010761385,0.00033742876,0.005564778,0.000008074219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01301268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016255112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01301268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056965754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037549032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0258739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201453104","doi":"","title":"Multiple Partnerships and Children's Wellbeing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family matters","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; General partnership; Phenomenon; Project commissioning; Publishing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Session (web analytics); Political science; Economic growth; Public relations; Social science; History; Economics; Advertising; Law; Business","score_opus":0.04907657126764747,"score_gpt":0.25829743389460896,"score_spread":0.2092208626269615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201453104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.665673,0.038052447,0.002346014,0.047760893,0.0004405096,0.00006814952,0.00029592714,0.0000405472,0.24532248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858064,0.007024559,0.0004305839,0.00031458942,0.00003873668,0.000021157335,0.000027772125,0.0000072551347,0.0063289534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724764,0.0013760747,0.00010223219,0.0001970624,0.00046041945,0.00061655603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955811,0.0011138568,0.0013186613,0.00017164224,0.0003895571,0.0014252615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028185288,0.00022064023,0.00035328566,0.0010733339,0.0036986875,0.004913088,0.0004844552,0.0008002651,0.008655467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083836205,0.00015329497,0.00023067162,0.0010483954,0.0051096794,0.003065902,0.008694941,0.0019028137,0.00039865915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010092371,0.0002289658,0.16044141,0.00047309915,0.00010181689,0.0019365004,0.24701795,0.00045434653,0.00041741182,0.38668898,0.011152158,0.1909865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030378715,0.00022440068,0.16905019,0.0015504202,0.000069924936,0.004406113,0.26579982,0.00022518165,0.00037261785,0.13787311,0.4203048,0.0000930047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005798473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009270216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008655467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002008442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024332209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0289554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282648729","doi":"","title":"New employment policies, poverty and mothering [The situation in Australia, New Zealand and Canada]","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family matters","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Publishing; Poverty; Sociology; Australian studies; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04019532182714192,"score_gpt":0.33435154642493303,"score_spread":0.2941562245977911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282648729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6020951,0.06735832,0.00011066367,0.26831734,0.0015338502,0.00010319525,0.0015528938,0.000029930854,0.05889867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.865433,0.072719015,0.00034773126,0.015524831,0.0004706136,0.00010211362,0.00042511284,0.000031700278,0.044945896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986141,0.00017068302,0.000058589147,0.000052976335,0.0003111419,0.0007924945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99546176,0.00034424468,0.00048435616,0.0000699144,0.001002338,0.0026372564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014066356,0.00021899914,0.000434032,0.00164627,0.016584309,0.0052356743,0.0014724664,0.0025851955,0.0071123415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050869896,0.00037704312,0.00038473305,0.0062102554,0.0052106855,0.0025098906,0.0028093902,0.003413504,0.00024523173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031773734,0.00033687663,0.32364827,0.0013033933,0.0001645061,0.0035353051,0.24311183,0.0007964161,0.0006795403,0.05264016,0.223292,0.15017392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021699901,0.00007146352,0.63201815,0.0011561835,0.00007207424,0.0003257782,0.21904206,0.00015687116,0.00008310225,0.0017593927,0.14521098,0.00008226482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99865013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061899766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061899766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16234343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44911635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366381860","doi":"10.1017/9781839703102.068","title":"Living Without The Jurisdictional Rules of Brussels IIA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Family matters","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Privilege (computing); Aside; Family law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Art","score_opus":0.01740378811191115,"score_gpt":0.28218167395708854,"score_spread":0.26477788584517736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366381860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056518083,0.0051488085,0.004896053,0.008887951,0.00075561536,0.000051680974,0.00028325067,0.00008014666,0.97424465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.547878,0.005969584,0.007949106,0.009047866,0.0010213548,0.0004491748,0.00077905145,0.00020404567,0.42670175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908832,0.0030504074,0.0004436207,0.0015892441,0.0026888167,0.0013447206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976502,0.0011609278,0.0002218565,0.00035086414,0.00048482092,0.00013139274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027959119,0.000504124,0.00051476987,0.0015305344,0.0063608726,0.010592619,0.0019289439,0.005284476,0.027216978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007214134,0.00050541275,0.00039832905,0.001965461,0.009844566,0.0037880947,0.0038895777,0.007209655,0.0062804585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005754179,0.000006647369,0.00013095715,0.000029950685,0.00000176816,0.00007449193,0.001272759,0.00017409233,0.00004789069,0.9809764,0.012055794,0.005223423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089997075,0.000021469536,0.0009281981,0.00066293264,0.000006218755,0.00020051475,0.0012983312,0.00028061421,0.00025114475,0.29815617,0.6981412,0.00004418525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06766126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052796766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06766126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008285476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006932973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13453484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}