{"meta":{"query_hash":"8cf335a9af1d","filters":{"venue":"Federal Law Review"},"cohort_total":34,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"exported":34,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8cf335a9af1d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Federal+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2211104402","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.1.7","title":"Time to Get Serious about Privacy Policies: The Special Case of Genetic Privacy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy policy; Information privacy; Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; Business; Consumer privacy; Privacy by Design; Genetic testing; FTC Fair Information Practice; Relation (database); Project commissioning; Privacy law; Privacy rights; Publishing; Law; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.030129494408833633,"score_gpt":0.3106534458376723,"score_spread":0.2805239514288387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211104402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7753374,0.038982123,0.00015135836,0.028185708,0.00034369226,0.005653672,0.000080506936,0.00015618425,0.15110934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8679271,0.011870583,0.0039967448,0.10272553,0.005446635,0.00025732358,0.000083660976,0.0001351893,0.0075572752],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983465,0.00021701625,0.0005771084,0.0002552152,0.00026736275,0.00033677014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848425,0.00012520028,0.00017859612,0.0008612973,0.00012152086,0.00022915698],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036961643,0.00022336455,0.0006664958,0.00003323848,0.00021942977,0.00003271173,0.0003143003,0.00006407622,0.0016154478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000546134,0.00014679371,0.00021863905,0.00021928838,0.00012558152,0.00006574915,0.00021239315,0.00018850421,0.0014194011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049599726,0.0012303063,0.0024522843,0.024794942,0.0005536918,0.0011242803,0.0064794472,0.000021443995,0.0010275864,0.034201767,0.5553754,0.37224287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004892769,0.00043689454,0.00200184,0.0026688804,0.0001600469,0.0009747167,0.0000042156553,0.000022273007,0.000111158784,0.00027705263,0.9926792,0.00017443819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003215165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028163067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43730384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041190284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007385233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226395077","doi":"10.22145/flr.37.1.1","title":"The Proscription of Terrorist Organisations in Australia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proscription; Terrorism; Legitimacy; Political science; Commonwealth; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04677800223217879,"score_gpt":0.37506266296255236,"score_spread":0.32828466073037355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226395077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62003976,0.07244038,0.0004919648,0.196572,0.0038376027,0.006467052,0.000082302344,0.00040521484,0.09966371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907696,0.0060961056,0.000014886268,0.0018631372,0.00012553479,0.000026304167,0.0000033194513,0.0000037827451,0.00109728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986845,0.00023757458,0.00037545623,0.00013879118,0.00026125155,0.0003024236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951786,0.00005639812,0.00009885079,0.0001816052,0.00006787914,0.00007742562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064411305,0.00009132916,0.00019548905,0.000013197393,0.00039609786,0.00006119156,0.00025365653,0.000056479304,0.00015490477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012704091,0.000064380816,0.000074013326,0.0001875665,0.0002815017,0.00018066113,0.000011108123,0.00012997464,0.000056127545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013670489,0.00021229229,0.0025835594,0.0004506242,0.0000108060685,0.0000067790206,0.017808864,3.9250637e-7,0.00016819432,0.94053966,0.015034517,0.023170657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032133135,0.00022939999,0.032083113,0.0044925082,0.00005060893,0.000004277548,0.0088453535,0.0000060344814,0.000106810854,0.02727778,0.9261661,0.00041665882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004181279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004214242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9132619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009412457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007024136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6320871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266143053","doi":"10.22145/flr.39.1.6","title":"The Process of Law Reform: Conditions for Success","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law reform; Law; Politics; Public law; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Project commissioning; Publishing","score_opus":0.06468398277748962,"score_gpt":0.38638811212857493,"score_spread":0.32170412935108533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266143053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024487748,0.034414683,0.000015284379,0.0018145805,0.00024365108,0.0010744804,0.00004415818,0.000052350155,0.9620959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99235326,0.0037127372,0.00024396679,0.0015490121,0.00012179948,0.0004342604,0.000007815205,0.000011511732,0.0015656286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989387,0.00011833313,0.00030284555,0.00013458914,0.00023959637,0.00026594903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916464,0.00010272061,0.00017055857,0.0002220995,0.0002636051,0.00007636488],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075032865,0.000084011175,0.00022523326,0.0000051299903,0.0013403447,0.000052442243,0.0004925816,0.00004961453,0.00025827414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015581408,0.000052226602,0.00012072414,0.00012842823,0.00070661097,0.000252269,0.000030711668,0.000075600634,0.00004134734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041984063,0.000019504427,0.000023710547,0.0005186837,0.000010665414,3.4325495e-7,0.0049883407,1.5705949e-8,5.3557307e-7,0.9934213,0.00073012465,0.0002825852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006992446,0.000031436266,0.000013435429,0.0005430364,0.00003236837,3.247758e-7,0.00020910978,4.4455197e-7,0.00009357206,0.031520937,0.967402,0.000083410494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064675272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005043361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004854095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007886647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269084978","doi":"10.22145/flr.31.2.2","title":"Burdened by Proof: How the Australian Refugee Review Tribunal has Failed Lesbian and Gay Asylum Seekers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Refugee; Lesbian; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Project commissioning; Criminology; Refugee law; Sociology; Publishing; Gender studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.05716202341117506,"score_gpt":0.31529697470194257,"score_spread":0.2581349512907675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269084978","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013333547,0.67958635,0.000010942699,0.26210013,0.00020474606,0.0014262899,0.000026610243,0.000046345136,0.05646522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33842844,0.6287852,0.00010710215,0.023625933,0.0003032647,0.00036489812,0.000024640309,0.000016328228,0.008344184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782693,0.0006729295,0.0003056649,0.00031167603,0.00046073794,0.00042204108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999307,0.00008135273,0.00015410299,0.0001726185,0.0001256568,0.00015931402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013853378,0.00020607613,0.000512262,0.000007686094,0.0025347474,0.00024010144,0.00023139863,0.00006869286,0.00031874006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049641775,0.00013300356,0.0001642952,0.00027708596,0.0011928917,0.00019657613,0.00003906004,0.00019686294,0.000052753374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038716908,0.00003155769,0.0002531247,0.0012599872,0.00007359845,0.000006721595,0.00010489208,3.9098367e-8,0.00000631569,0.6385813,0.35160726,0.008071348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012401876,0.000026812395,0.00006988372,0.004444306,0.00010542276,0.000005404171,0.00007388987,4.987493e-8,0.000010968322,0.0030913553,0.9918546,0.00019329101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023186004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004155695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64024734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008225316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020631556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277183366","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.1.3","title":"Proroguing the Parliament of Australia: The Effect on the Senate and the Conventions that Constrain the Prerogative Power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Commonwealth; Prerogative; Constitution; Law; Scrutiny; Politics; Political science; Power (physics); House of Commons; Sociology","score_opus":0.06500949117634366,"score_gpt":0.35622047821575353,"score_spread":0.29121098703940984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277183366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11832453,0.0602611,0.000036682235,0.6489383,0.00046231606,0.01615132,0.000072429226,0.00006164558,0.1556917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99345195,0.002237821,0.0000046736486,0.0028130934,0.00008229995,0.00072958687,0.0000010416566,0.0000053517824,0.00067416794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975039,0.0016253984,0.00020671565,0.00011267608,0.00030266913,0.00024864657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785644,0.0015022318,0.00020769106,0.0003526251,0.000040201132,0.000040793624],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004412304,0.00011649693,0.00018273474,0.0000026306598,0.0024115543,0.00015613313,0.000423824,0.000030489058,0.00019165367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017457064,0.000032763706,0.00016554694,0.00012091115,0.0019376619,0.00008702742,0.000087546345,0.00026085312,0.000037980255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040609107,0.000014740664,0.00021101921,0.00004529748,0.000045851724,5.282239e-8,0.0028719876,3.2851486e-7,0.0000041850035,0.99449444,0.0016605312,0.00064748985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002471194,0.000042725416,0.0015985634,0.00078402145,0.0001717594,0.0000034227335,0.0025709535,0.0000034124978,0.0001879516,0.0035910574,0.9907041,0.000094894094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013845747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005958753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9909034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024581695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026634467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336534342","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.1.9","title":"Realising the Public Potential of Corporate Law: Twenty Years of Civil Penalty Enforcement in Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Fiduciary; Public law; Corporate law; Private law; Commercial law; Corporate governance; Law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Enforcement; Corporate group; Municipal law; Administrative law; Political science; Comparative law; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.0817171552472051,"score_gpt":0.3426131843189589,"score_spread":0.2608960290717538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336534342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2187892,0.010787848,0.0009757803,0.042278703,0.00079901156,0.0050675813,0.00014264436,0.00010540891,0.72105384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741507,0.0014317184,0.00006739132,0.000626847,0.000060999148,0.000025963769,0.000010707986,0.0000040884743,0.00035723962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988131,0.00024961794,0.00036574906,0.00011664941,0.00027687295,0.00017800179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929035,0.0000388144,0.00033182686,0.00020983079,0.00007567687,0.000053483378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001386472,0.00006052406,0.00021114844,0.000009871193,0.00019350022,0.000051093248,0.00026813438,0.00003278033,0.000354138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051029758,0.00004548231,0.0000900304,0.00018001802,0.00024903833,0.00011799723,0.000056930105,0.00008703427,0.000017088609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011185185,0.000023083263,0.00012839628,0.00015615442,0.0000047961857,2.6505612e-7,0.00009881256,0.0000071078757,0.000032450593,0.99752384,0.0007595273,0.00126444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001332926,0.00002050324,0.0016058641,0.0005389989,0.000021397513,5.632696e-7,0.00004122087,0.000023418466,0.000037609036,0.0116897365,0.98580354,0.000083865605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040360905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03700749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003297587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005239051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341114917","doi":"10.22145/flr.43.2.4","title":"Meeting Australia's Labour Needs: The Case for a New Low-Skill Work Visa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Economic shortage; Work (physics); Backdoor; Labour economics; Migrant workers; Project commissioning; Business; Gig economy; Political science; Public relations; Economics; Engineering; Publishing; Labour law; Economic growth; Law; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.07370987631042583,"score_gpt":0.3649032628772893,"score_spread":0.29119338656686344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341114917","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2202829,0.22210094,0.0027626434,0.38223243,0.0050778766,0.013626222,0.00020336102,0.0009857129,0.1527279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7907084,0.013662508,0.003756451,0.04679694,0.0029115418,0.00034662886,0.000044260076,0.000060090264,0.14171317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988223,0.00026077262,0.00027043294,0.00014069238,0.00020735779,0.00029846196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991306,0.00013116938,0.00012605848,0.00018287236,0.00017647154,0.0002528477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013901109,0.00011721122,0.00021623357,0.000011441273,0.00066580705,0.0002464542,0.00022212575,0.00006589124,0.000251529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005609316,0.000078569436,0.00012215166,0.0004077223,0.00008371639,0.00014533602,0.000026593601,0.00010853001,0.00010617227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006246543,0.000022375712,0.00008380124,0.0002426505,0.000014014174,0.000021564474,0.00547787,0.00000917059,3.5538113e-7,0.7890818,0.20011649,0.0049236496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015392275,0.00001569361,0.0000068683557,0.0007322346,0.00002738858,0.000013273958,0.0011593439,0.000016784745,8.803507e-7,0.0015547321,0.9961965,0.00012235428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01199244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045626696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79608005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006982902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018297862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99458677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601966673","doi":"10.22145/flr.43.3.1","title":"Constitutional Incongruence: Explaining the Failure of the Council of the Australian Federation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Politics; Corporate governance; Project commissioning; Political science; Public administration; Publishing; Law; Sociology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.13042088907990232,"score_gpt":0.3405398591506105,"score_spread":0.2101189700707082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601966673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034005083,0.0144330105,0.000054506,0.43188044,0.0037340221,0.0046451483,0.0002646959,0.00008054089,0.5109025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934573,0.00035696232,0.00004993792,0.0033629278,0.00018560098,0.000031700947,0.0000029726748,0.0000043359914,0.0025482154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744713,0.00060359406,0.0004763274,0.00014352388,0.0010581228,0.00027128507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998445,0.00012353227,0.00036336368,0.00036559376,0.0005992659,0.000103266226],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021177137,0.00012489238,0.00026273163,0.0000042246465,0.0015266215,0.000116339375,0.0006255563,0.000084076506,0.00013370221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005918762,0.000062441715,0.00019033135,0.00021519327,0.0019323071,0.00015856222,0.000091982496,0.00024364969,0.000008557034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021026572,0.000015115837,0.0008874821,0.00013947039,0.000011853768,3.0691777e-7,0.0021051266,0.0000091668035,0.000007050691,0.9712177,0.025447013,0.00015760152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016198099,0.000015492307,0.0006086101,0.001083596,0.000035718316,0.000006601221,0.00076761254,0.0000035900678,0.00007529101,0.0089290505,0.9882163,0.00009620433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014283409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02705145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9627692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038078145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003470666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781112312","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.10","title":"Justiciability, Access to Justice and the Development of Constitutional Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Duty; Justiciability; Political science; Government (linguistics); Common law; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Economic Justice; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.07835296890226545,"score_gpt":0.3644354827945134,"score_spread":0.2860825138922479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781112312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012215971,0.022252876,0.00008782124,0.054537244,0.0007074256,0.0012841423,0.00002523118,0.000009212686,0.90888005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99244195,0.0019265753,0.00013305164,0.0053596473,0.00006115832,0.000057750105,7.0374733e-7,9.2704266e-7,0.000018215851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991007,0.000089731744,0.0002574279,0.00011802351,0.00028463246,0.00014952228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994656,0.00017531858,0.000093275725,0.00010188189,0.00010443875,0.000059506678],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000778285,0.00006452114,0.00024073602,0.0000042945235,0.0025195163,0.00008148461,0.00032757886,0.000014504626,0.000045821565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059308304,0.00004315095,0.000021991393,0.000045058765,0.0022399845,0.00013033501,0.00021514564,0.000056225483,0.0000039125866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007080019,0.0000064631286,0.0021837908,0.0002036035,0.000007987624,0.0000011513716,0.00014380286,0.0000012910398,1.3711372e-7,0.99541175,0.00042378547,0.0016091337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039384348,0.000004275034,0.03427646,0.0021391881,0.00009592753,0.0000011256493,0.00029772203,0.0000012827942,0.000007992124,0.024060024,0.9385401,0.00018204055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95197135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.980226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016786756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019463776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781327244","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.6","title":"Re-Evaluating the Doctrine of Deference in Administrative Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Doctrine; Administrative law; Political science; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Judicial review; Common law; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Project commissioning; High Court; Sociology; Publishing","score_opus":0.2729267636078582,"score_gpt":0.5032675907602394,"score_spread":0.2303408271523812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781327244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010583966,0.0064485637,0.000007737801,0.027778406,0.00004354424,0.0007383728,0.0000102015,0.000012409142,0.9543768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939114,0.003986213,0.00022209762,0.0011572812,0.000057134544,0.000090846006,0.0000014511512,0.0000026040614,0.0005709781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991434,0.00017298108,0.00022940912,0.00012044324,0.00019786817,0.00013585815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919844,0.00012284429,0.00022838863,0.0003455282,0.00006847636,0.00003630721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011656838,0.000056732628,0.00016641384,0.000002735733,0.00125329,0.00011906247,0.0004733292,0.000024351615,0.00017420719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031724366,0.000037066453,0.000056080138,0.000053118813,0.00035370223,0.00014221633,0.00007360403,0.000106635984,0.000025800467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011479782,0.000012862907,0.00029804328,0.000082542356,0.0000022027532,3.6583486e-7,0.0002789164,2.2400211e-7,0.000006994441,0.99608827,0.00011792326,0.0031105361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015093919,0.000057128058,0.0031672062,0.0016508357,0.000021572072,3.9214052e-7,0.00023662811,0.000012705598,0.00009015404,0.021056658,0.97342986,0.00012594624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017473508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061872497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98332745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002275669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010250617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802150874","doi":"10.22145/flr.46.1.6","title":"The Survival of Reasonableness Review: Confirming the Boundaries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Standard of review; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Proportionality (law); Political science; Substantive law; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.056110595003917504,"score_gpt":0.37315237777572585,"score_spread":0.31704178277180833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802150874","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019075678,0.7715436,0.000014203073,0.0828326,0.00079798454,0.0006911357,0.000004235207,0.00002955735,0.1438959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13856013,0.8462811,0.000042002615,0.0106817195,0.0006473376,0.000087727385,0.0000021926253,0.000011890729,0.0036858956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979464,0.0006882004,0.00037766513,0.00016609213,0.00050692214,0.0003147601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841285,0.00055201375,0.00021173614,0.0003854919,0.00037506418,0.00006284769],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004347322,0.00011082457,0.0003354846,0.0000030556419,0.004509485,0.00027108905,0.00062299956,0.000033013217,0.00038805604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011861061,0.000056176243,0.00014571835,0.00019949932,0.0029171377,0.00017307124,0.00008419341,0.00011105434,0.00010002381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057477832,0.0000062274607,0.000048186354,0.0017970626,0.000010762605,9.113687e-7,0.00025525552,4.7718864e-9,0.0000019018737,0.91958237,0.06194291,0.01634865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022578597,0.000024487188,0.000055842083,0.010218041,0.00006092336,0.0000025315555,0.00013801272,2.9098774e-7,0.0000149728785,0.0017889163,0.98759186,0.00008155847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010041851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021029532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9256489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029777679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029486095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912109766","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1804600304","title":"‘Pretaliatory’ Enforcement Action for Chilling Whistleblowing through Corporate Agreements: Lessons from North America","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Enforcement; Legislation; Business; Misconduct; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Law; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.48585332385580543,"score_gpt":0.4817691846553312,"score_spread":0.004084139200474235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912109766","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12443237,0.10162181,0.56441605,0.05997432,0.031536493,0.008458342,0.000928594,0.0005352385,0.1080968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9417366,0.018902453,0.013974269,0.021826694,0.001628412,0.0002560838,0.00041205372,0.0000400288,0.0012234107],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974232,0.00014563646,0.00080269255,0.00055707974,0.00078844035,0.0002829643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972964,0.00046273606,0.0008004896,0.0006000305,0.00076216256,0.00007818248],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011377728,0.00019715393,0.00043551205,0.000031006897,0.000985473,0.00035679323,0.0004499905,0.000065817796,0.0016424346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009215466,0.00014739367,0.00018556598,0.0004160131,0.00017623157,0.0006889444,0.00008401995,0.00014225692,0.000562508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013042659,0.0004446531,0.006074787,0.0019955782,0.0003486062,0.0000036460413,0.004344204,0.00016693881,0.00032513915,0.3708979,0.21522471,0.40004343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016757002,0.00006381103,0.00065985665,0.0012172767,0.000053916254,7.260802e-7,0.00013092562,0.00025023424,0.00013286971,0.049378328,0.9477211,0.00022339165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010150033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012203839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8173042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009555173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012586644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913281582","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1804600411","title":"The Dilemma of Indigenous Self-Government in Canada: Indigenous Rights and Canadian Federalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Sovereignty; Federalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Constitution; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Dual federalism; Minority rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015484743323703483,"score_gpt":0.26154858220707594,"score_spread":0.24606383888337247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913281582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89773464,0.06148927,1.1947967e-7,0.0055097067,0.00043382577,0.001915577,0.000053859072,0.000025063426,0.03283792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98529834,0.012671821,0.000044367094,0.0014968237,0.00013825593,0.000047693567,0.0000020016346,0.0000073771666,0.00029335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794644,0.00027014303,0.0003658907,0.00020474358,0.0005931783,0.000619593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921185,0.00012368266,0.00015192122,0.00014297414,0.00012540484,0.00024416918],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058514084,0.0001590141,0.00035436449,0.0000073523547,0.0035780685,0.00010302364,0.00028830447,0.000057480396,0.000058982518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007927984,0.00009991859,0.00004737868,0.00015695799,0.00033387163,0.00010776189,0.000059274775,0.00013632212,0.000009030706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053158048,0.00026299403,0.16317376,0.0030152986,0.0009943654,0.0003139525,0.3420945,0.0000015546871,0.000018393466,0.3775204,0.043114617,0.06943698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118916694,0.000035441164,0.030647699,0.0004041578,0.00002193438,0.0000023196387,0.0006528941,5.545628e-7,0.0000144120195,0.00037612094,0.9675405,0.00018503718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99989575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9244259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026569322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013330323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934112569","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19831805","title":"Finding the Foothold: Freedom of Political Association in the Australian <i>Constitution</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Constitution; Corollary; Politics; Law; Political communication; Supreme court; Political freedom; Jurisprudence; Freedom of the press; Political science; Sociology; Association (psychology); Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.033459419538779914,"score_gpt":0.3270030402620783,"score_spread":0.2935436207232984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2934112569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009124127,0.011345051,0.0000021113228,0.13476443,0.000596189,0.001360452,0.000025854308,0.000030125253,0.8427516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98235446,0.0037341884,0.00004511365,0.010197777,0.00021537465,0.000034646968,0.000005739557,0.0000025988545,0.0034101144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985346,0.0004899623,0.00021399348,0.0000991354,0.00039242892,0.00026984667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943405,0.0002300687,0.00011102171,0.00014149818,0.000053546373,0.000029815272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019239876,0.00006545638,0.00017126194,0.000001311168,0.00044301353,0.00007416311,0.00030260257,0.0000994786,0.0003007061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019322078,0.000034712935,0.00014474757,0.0002101471,0.0002238909,0.00012999751,0.00001852332,0.00021556455,0.00007953103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.45724e-7,0.000013918932,0.0032091448,0.00011326325,0.0000065790964,3.1315648e-7,0.0009747278,7.2762026e-7,0.000003812507,0.974585,0.021032568,0.00005952137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000857031,0.000008471394,0.0012170328,0.0005668803,0.000021686767,9.269121e-7,0.00130589,3.5708254e-7,0.000005898269,0.0047660195,0.9919606,0.00006052813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025532616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018791534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012912187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007378462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3859785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989922706","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19890443","title":"Re-evaluating the Collateral Challenge in the Era of Statutory Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Particle Physics","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Collateral; Legislature; Law; Statutory law; Legislative intent; Political science; Law and economics; Entitlement (fair division); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06463917718911977,"score_gpt":0.39831135338932117,"score_spread":0.3336721762002014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989922706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14989652,0.040400527,0.000026408294,0.088894896,0.00023786153,0.0036095,0.000012508388,0.00003247193,0.7168893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906438,0.0054521346,0.00008055309,0.0034151203,0.000048691763,0.00010808593,0.0000031870604,0.000003606316,0.0002448317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988111,0.00048413253,0.00023090994,0.000101252255,0.00025137397,0.00012122144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942183,0.00020507672,0.0001161552,0.00019409719,0.000047830887,0.00001502926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017986483,0.00005147217,0.00012905522,0.000004266665,0.00024389994,0.000050671017,0.0002765357,0.000023484119,0.00021626131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052078463,0.000028194263,0.00005911241,0.00013500356,0.000076877455,0.000110362074,0.000029010638,0.00015233556,0.000058928883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005833765,0.00003304637,0.00029248252,0.00035425092,0.000006378887,2.4044652e-7,0.012907604,0.000010951232,0.000011129528,0.95616394,0.00062400225,0.029590167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001464254,0.00008958552,0.0015572974,0.0015762444,0.00001808728,3.0263706e-7,0.0019452674,0.00027983505,0.000002928271,0.004169019,0.99011475,0.00010023641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026354874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004974957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98949075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034717734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007533624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3984086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992013934","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19892363","title":"Withdrawn: Knighthoods and the Order of Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Prime minister; Prime (order theory); Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Operations research; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics; Business; Combinatorics; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.034121007454672045,"score_gpt":0.3490452409046103,"score_spread":0.31492423344993825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992013934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066578224,0.066828586,0.000024119523,0.10431381,0.0012000455,0.004797622,0.00004810489,0.00010590585,0.7561036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96502316,0.012096656,0.00015142852,0.0034366548,0.00012850256,0.000027062753,0.000003433418,0.000010248985,0.019122846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854153,0.00036999068,0.00033058206,0.00017106322,0.00027951662,0.00030733013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923795,0.0001292781,0.00014615143,0.0002647011,0.00010593493,0.000115954375],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010093867,0.00011881595,0.000412686,0.000010816292,0.000402182,0.000098288605,0.0002309713,0.00006641065,0.0014916231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006352692,0.0000751847,0.00010359727,0.00014631046,0.0005556063,0.00010993718,0.000047558442,0.00015292282,0.00010742962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066754083,0.000011171983,0.0005369904,0.000532314,0.0000140194725,7.137561e-7,0.00045038614,1.1766675e-7,0.000001255102,0.99310976,0.004983154,0.0003534114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050839223,0.000030755877,0.0008148081,0.0007860752,0.000037384958,0.0000036298852,0.00008412913,0.0000023541454,0.000005936161,0.0155517,0.9820383,0.00013652295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018474506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025633753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020942942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008279986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085997748","doi":"10.1177/0067205x20955069","title":"Indigenous Constitutionalism and Dispute Resolution Outside the Courts: An Invitation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Indigenous rights; Institution; Political science; Liberalism; Supreme court; Sociology; Constitutional law; Human rights; Democracy","score_opus":0.06827181375930244,"score_gpt":0.3446184206711721,"score_spread":0.27634660691186963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085997748","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039704684,0.37788352,0.00029401842,0.53364265,0.000573389,0.004237428,0.00008722402,0.0003769791,0.043200087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89365864,0.057313517,0.0004916069,0.04769119,0.0005519365,0.00011724049,0.00004084677,0.00000802344,0.00012702163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877465,0.00037254128,0.00019238699,0.0001791856,0.00029189282,0.00018933766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995219,0.00008991181,0.000094437164,0.00006619789,0.00010345088,0.00012406884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004605424,0.00009664144,0.00018252504,0.0000029881649,0.0023320082,0.00013817204,0.00012700503,0.000044399305,0.00004146115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003381096,0.000060763894,0.000049420665,0.00009161142,0.00055450515,0.00033543666,0.000044276614,0.00011582399,0.000037531005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006999815,0.00002137406,0.0006871209,0.0003436393,0.000038513095,0.0000047261206,0.027546804,0.0000056643607,0.000015635207,0.9512915,0.013687492,0.00635052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097416836,0.000030154082,0.0023469396,0.0002604116,0.000040486946,0.0000016271945,0.000702719,0.000013517525,0.0000018243111,0.0011011685,0.99528044,0.00012331389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069248625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003772651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98159295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000795029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005503572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086727983","doi":"10.1177/0067205x20955068","title":"A First Nations Voice: Institutionalising Political Listening","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Politics; Democracy; Public administration; Legislature; State (computer science); Political science; Corporate governance; Institution; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Management; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08724136824589092,"score_gpt":0.37684570165123693,"score_spread":0.289604333405346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086727983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016407047,0.029992094,0.0011844626,0.15451525,0.0002585937,0.0005824954,0.000012138941,0.00026029072,0.81155396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693565,0.00065422466,0.0009232638,0.028401844,0.00020589244,0.00010021488,0.000041610096,0.000011098961,0.00030536897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991261,0.000121783036,0.00025434644,0.00015916259,0.00012094848,0.00021770378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942106,0.00012000332,0.00004617644,0.00022248925,0.000043907312,0.00014636447],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015027265,0.00008707418,0.00016303874,0.0000140381035,0.0005241178,0.00003775219,0.00017638397,0.000043715383,0.00077071396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019805742,0.000081836835,0.00008410597,0.00017363382,0.000058120168,0.000109244225,0.000065145745,0.00016359007,0.001179877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027746025,0.000033731314,0.00033552846,0.000365118,0.000015187054,0.0000035684432,0.00014272588,0.0000011478617,0.0000018913308,0.99552816,0.0032140724,0.0003560724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016698694,0.000038187205,0.0019676734,0.0012557579,0.000026066908,0.000020487605,0.00001608912,0.000050445782,0.0000016975703,0.00040426414,0.9959433,0.00010902852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002927583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011629931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004426019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033219625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122253256","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.2.4","title":"Investor-State Arbitration: The Roadmap from the Multilateral Agreement on Investment to the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Investment protection; International trade; Treaty; Investment (military); Business; General partnership; Multinational corporation; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Position (finance); State (computer science); Law; Finance; Foreign direct investment; Political science; International investment; Politics","score_opus":0.05175145912435978,"score_gpt":0.2693442461313393,"score_spread":0.2175927870069795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122253256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011049652,0.009377601,0.00011521811,0.33218718,0.0019559527,0.0048021646,0.000028911843,0.00012324542,0.64036006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41850907,0.00038883937,0.000051190535,0.577047,0.0018202482,0.0005529936,0.000118186326,0.000019858102,0.0014926007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976909,0.000156738,0.00059414376,0.00031802745,0.00078156474,0.00045858536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888563,0.000100125544,0.00026106503,0.0005768815,0.000118126925,0.00005817018],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011595665,0.00034494,0.00025407784,0.000026716241,0.0009775872,0.0006452517,0.00062817935,0.000036871425,0.0015045018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046483015,0.00015922949,0.00022238596,0.0002278303,0.00011834583,0.0007228701,0.00010253975,0.00026365268,0.0031567647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025924572,0.0001290158,0.00043721325,0.00010382342,0.00008475042,0.000001016924,0.00036221714,0.000035692323,0.00002724715,0.79698044,0.20125723,0.0005554431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026779206,0.000027181783,0.0029307131,0.00054585445,0.00008051857,0.0000010774984,0.00006115602,0.00019539238,0.000100816025,0.002286512,0.9932645,0.00023848475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010648861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010596889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7946939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009949464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024225357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122934301","doi":"10.22145/flr.38.3.5","title":"Judiciaries in Crisis — Some Comparative Perspectives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Meaning (existential); Political science; Power (physics); Executive power; Law; Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0490169392290615,"score_gpt":0.363439455138616,"score_spread":0.3144225159095545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122934301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016913356,0.23835327,0.000007317372,0.0601129,0.0006397539,0.00068550877,0.00001269854,0.00009372459,0.68318146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967974,0.027874313,0.00007675476,0.003589265,0.00032911228,0.00006533621,0.0000014216178,0.0000024213346,0.00008736128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990879,0.00011636714,0.0001773414,0.00017455923,0.00022623416,0.00021758904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963915,0.00007666473,0.000051157604,0.00007199637,0.000103014594,0.000058006826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036742273,0.000092671515,0.00030725615,0.000016575179,0.00094122405,0.000056448454,0.00013736547,0.000042490086,0.00042385285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013077415,0.00007704382,0.00008106469,0.00017524174,0.0007802729,0.0003255391,0.000038486913,0.00020571596,0.00012224252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022535469,0.00003392597,0.00034533194,0.000020962485,0.000010579751,0.000002608883,0.0025262812,9.906541e-8,0.0000038984713,0.99223894,0.0045911623,0.00022397435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008614856,0.0000133432895,0.0018317485,0.00033999112,0.000015573733,7.958155e-7,0.0044685276,2.863511e-7,0.00000683157,0.16704237,0.826037,0.0001574103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032309134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09637885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95106065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004469902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011667043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9741348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123103951","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.3.3","title":"The Honour of the Dead – the Moral Right of Integrity Post-Mortem","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Law; Prejudice (legal term); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.02856023272696993,"score_gpt":0.3116974059079512,"score_spread":0.28313717318098125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123103951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028249836,0.074069306,0.000116986135,0.15442908,0.0019252079,0.0023489636,0.000023117826,0.00007093313,0.73876655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99125016,0.0046164123,0.000072204886,0.0027946602,0.00011667943,0.000020183717,0.0000012156919,0.0000042491574,0.0011242415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981428,0.0009755205,0.00029553138,0.000087305256,0.00036361718,0.00013525477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885523,0.00033114423,0.00026851927,0.00032495699,0.0001847754,0.00003537328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021462154,0.000069856585,0.00018892712,0.000004015782,0.0010147277,0.00004681615,0.0005616607,0.000044204753,0.00014484115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007782143,0.000025605606,0.00017736456,0.00012191435,0.0005041784,0.000087223976,0.00006681286,0.00017685503,0.000022490429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003920439,0.000016018706,0.00017939354,0.00011284369,0.0000061278806,5.919372e-8,0.00026695503,3.209038e-7,0.000037481583,0.9754425,0.016031517,0.007902806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008283588,0.000022522952,0.002405645,0.0012126305,0.000022030501,9.840646e-7,0.00016094805,0.000020684027,0.00024182384,0.0112783415,0.9844918,0.00005974587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038667975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005004552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96846026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015091503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006713388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7804568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124358534","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.3.4","title":"Open Justice: Concepts and Judicial Approaches","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Statute; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.14178998189936715,"score_gpt":0.40267549561988003,"score_spread":0.2608855137205129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124358534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003507496,0.26322857,0.0000038645585,0.007896104,0.00035660787,0.00066955696,0.0000053383746,0.000038224123,0.727451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65715665,0.27741686,0.0019877153,0.047311574,0.0037296335,0.00029264175,0.000027539549,0.00002673277,0.012050638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989756,0.00023755811,0.00014220444,0.00014241358,0.00019484386,0.00030741008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958324,0.000044215813,0.000066282126,0.000099724595,0.0000304462,0.00017609845],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097006693,0.000091561094,0.00023504063,5.646725e-7,0.0013066247,0.0002010337,0.00030224383,0.000092592454,0.00067205896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008454573,0.00006982962,0.00006354397,0.000092327944,0.00036463147,0.0005521788,0.00014670927,0.000120424425,0.000089608475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011975203,0.000025067715,0.0001455651,0.00036597054,0.000010303341,3.0512356e-7,0.0028248113,1.4065126e-8,6.669844e-7,0.92683756,0.065056644,0.004731897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000906376,0.0000074627997,0.000103845574,0.0003877781,0.000079927195,0.0000017960417,0.0010300932,1.960757e-7,0.0000026040505,0.0018126981,0.9963641,0.000118850614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006421436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003631143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9313075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029009603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004525365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125224730","doi":"10.22145/flr.41.1.6","title":"Considering Canadian Approaches to Equality in the Context of Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Law; Project commissioning; High Court; Political science; Publishing; Racism; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.16254608544722277,"score_gpt":0.33825860967231586,"score_spread":0.1757125242250931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125224730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80291206,0.0386316,0.000020238896,0.045956176,0.0001778875,0.0036718477,0.00021134451,0.000022305816,0.10839655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954643,0.002858806,0.00023934167,0.0012902826,0.000033345186,0.000087287655,0.0000070414044,0.0000014474266,0.000018117416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990149,0.000262056,0.00025647867,0.00011173418,0.00018770718,0.00016713084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946314,0.00023288881,0.00007909945,0.000050069495,0.000099362325,0.00007544716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005893119,0.00007630609,0.00025532738,0.000012283695,0.00030851716,0.000042452302,0.00008667829,0.000035501755,0.00021915234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023855305,0.000049756844,0.00004153553,0.000091378155,0.00068054855,0.0001466685,0.000011656457,0.0000669363,0.00000846738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002976663,0.000026014624,0.010980208,0.00088776724,0.000028646798,7.8165124e-7,0.016903093,6.0868587e-7,0.000012500638,0.9625339,0.001724172,0.0068993317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010918013,0.0001636178,0.20211133,0.009429612,0.00016495424,0.00001471398,0.09588222,0.0000082258875,0.0001410718,0.011912348,0.6780894,0.0009907143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6579938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82803637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95062155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006332877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018526881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34428367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238265016","doi":"10.22145/flr.36.3.1","title":"The Dangers of Shared Care Legislation: Why Australia Needs (Yet More) Family Law Reform","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law reform; Family law; Project commissioning; Law; Political science; Publishing","score_opus":0.07022404376108987,"score_gpt":0.3400619872985388,"score_spread":0.26983794353744894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238265016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007963871,0.08538684,0.0000075720423,0.015213415,0.0007552954,0.0009923832,0.000044267083,0.0001038807,0.88953245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196423,0.06769514,0.00013799603,0.005830293,0.00045819336,0.000086294196,0.00006367231,0.000019375859,0.0060667316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986633,0.00012520663,0.0003522364,0.00014069409,0.00045988834,0.00025865197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992286,0.000042747826,0.00016738476,0.00025400642,0.00021579035,0.000091449496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037561337,0.000120479686,0.00025985463,0.000013940581,0.0016373751,0.00007685218,0.00026164632,0.00007821429,0.00019618648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002345529,0.00008398246,0.000180939,0.00026090431,0.00047707907,0.00029763463,0.000032214786,0.00011917718,0.00003239876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001297416,0.00002006484,0.00033252465,0.0003761862,0.000034424498,0.000005976057,0.010893646,8.977347e-7,0.000023412902,0.95387524,0.028442638,0.0059819934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010105302,0.000033169825,0.0009581664,0.00054233725,0.000024548155,0.0000022091303,0.0007425506,7.3907955e-7,0.000011320814,0.000119357304,0.997357,0.00010755534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049199093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011977915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96891433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014071117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007733883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239403724","doi":"10.22145/flr.28.3.2","title":"The Amicus Curiae and Intervener in the High Court of Australia: A Comparative Analysis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; High Court; Law","score_opus":0.0715606218552786,"score_gpt":0.37732520514611634,"score_spread":0.3057645832908377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239403724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36314768,0.2776912,0.000006842191,0.06900137,0.00016397193,0.0013141334,0.0000496778,0.000023117853,0.28860205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96366984,0.035325006,0.0000072427697,0.00061302865,0.000040680934,0.000031018477,0.000001703858,5.476478e-7,0.00031093915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991091,0.0003132096,0.00019949308,0.000084236715,0.00017986343,0.00011409038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967605,0.00014637796,0.00005494143,0.00006513416,0.00004014083,0.000017342983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006209135,0.00005711927,0.000250101,0.000007354751,0.0006646926,0.000040412044,0.00014538792,0.000017032078,0.00024272577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020148073,0.00002788305,0.00009510196,0.00031805536,0.0006842923,0.000049428338,0.000014657292,0.000065883636,0.000014927666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005447377,0.000023564002,0.0016011437,0.000022272669,0.00012113369,0.0000013692013,0.0010045907,0.0000028033946,1.8457423e-7,0.9928024,0.0023579863,0.0020571335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009247885,0.00002532631,0.03224479,0.00042293087,0.00024581622,6.9316934e-7,0.0005645355,0.0000017525223,0.0000011742893,0.013910856,0.952406,0.00008364118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055181358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116403356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015969481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017656383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95111024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243786276","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1504300204","title":"Meeting Australia's Labour Needs: The Case for a New Low-Skill Work Visa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Project commissioning; Publishing; Labour economics; Gig economy; Management; Political science; Business; Engineering; Economics; Law; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.0823541066774538,"score_gpt":0.3663007818266725,"score_spread":0.2839466751492187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243786276","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19212632,0.2437599,0.0005708624,0.3529028,0.0061192648,0.013326461,0.00025416556,0.000706963,0.19023328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8354569,0.008574383,0.001847772,0.05887372,0.003121138,0.00035449804,0.000022951514,0.00005319088,0.091695435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998757,0.00021632729,0.00026565517,0.0001538708,0.0002243296,0.00038284043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911296,0.00012583683,0.000118603064,0.00021362226,0.00015656064,0.00027240047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013132776,0.00012457254,0.00022891429,0.000011058649,0.00097018847,0.00024917437,0.00026716111,0.000055010478,0.00026340628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040526668,0.000078024335,0.0001283341,0.00039566093,0.000089345274,0.00016836637,0.000049260158,0.0001029897,0.000035709007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030816027,0.000026549533,0.00007959603,0.00008394156,0.00001770855,0.000021296184,0.0012223782,0.0000010639512,3.9813267e-7,0.84471387,0.14869043,0.005139699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020123676,0.00002179693,0.00006069092,0.00092801184,0.00003860335,0.000006693909,0.00059744425,4.7009073e-7,0.0000025252757,0.0028545014,0.9951637,0.00012433722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04010455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015435064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8464733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071187256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016521863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9662875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248404925","doi":"10.1177/0067205x0403200101","title":"Rights, 'Dialogue' and Democratic Objections to Judicial Review","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law; Project commissioning; Law and economics; Publishing; Judicial review; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028867238795380747,"score_gpt":0.31940084993682827,"score_spread":0.29053361114144755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248404925","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019936697,0.60167056,0.00009024625,0.06936849,0.0004238982,0.0012173721,0.000012220859,0.000093412025,0.3269244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13785748,0.7785211,0.0005297045,0.08136034,0.00093206874,0.00032636896,0.000010328359,0.000009084827,0.00045347595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988466,0.00012046996,0.00027806062,0.00021845492,0.00027750325,0.00025893122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995299,0.000043706696,0.000057152367,0.0000927436,0.00010473626,0.00017174055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042434284,0.0001230454,0.00037985595,0.000014635713,0.0023084034,0.000046047484,0.00011474139,0.00003707558,0.00016424067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023674575,0.0000981678,0.00009737125,0.00031104268,0.00036024113,0.00012943037,0.000051037547,0.00009410054,0.00031939067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010922947,0.00002057312,0.000022965965,0.00039686088,0.00001596267,0.000004789781,0.00008400512,2.5472312e-7,8.1399014e-7,0.980337,0.016920546,0.0021950987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007211429,0.000028228842,0.00016171036,0.009048264,0.00007835153,0.000005799903,0.0000099861345,1.3431001e-8,0.000001294693,0.116773054,0.8736793,0.00014187765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028565358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044569492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86356395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009605193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017126008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256167964","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.11","title":"Lisa Burton Crawford The Rule of Law and the Australian Constitution - Janina Boughey Human Rights and Judicial Review in Australia and Canada: The Newest Despotism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05260209595554128,"score_gpt":0.3407976567241885,"score_spread":0.2881955607686472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256167964","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09481094,0.40383905,0.0000013331545,0.24482879,0.0009024856,0.0046447287,0.00009290452,0.000025653088,0.2508541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377183,0.0579211,0.000005691564,0.0037098213,0.00015176552,0.000055228353,0.0000026723064,0.0000023211073,0.0004331498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985995,0.00032510157,0.00035210096,0.0001912115,0.00029390556,0.00023816024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992644,0.0001378337,0.0002488115,0.00020793502,0.00007540807,0.0000655881],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012973086,0.00014928765,0.00043979913,0.0000052985065,0.0062533193,0.00016764093,0.0002918975,0.000046079378,0.000060886832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014660643,0.000072053146,0.000054308217,0.000052585605,0.0064359284,0.00018879115,0.00011957782,0.00017855475,0.0000016655382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066315165,0.000006424916,0.0009584182,0.00029071778,0.000020250376,0.0000044500503,0.00016307701,3.82992e-8,8.380809e-7,0.99346447,0.004750278,0.00033439035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033669514,0.000016312384,0.017302994,0.0051103225,0.00015311905,0.000010510876,0.000042631287,1.18780086e-7,0.000003392656,0.030739242,0.9461546,0.0001300458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9808962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98032445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9627252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051883155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015465252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256397086","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1304100106","title":"Considering Canadian Approaches to Equality in the Context of Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Project commissioning; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Media studies; Publishing; Ethnology; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.16254608544722277,"score_gpt":0.33825860967231586,"score_spread":0.1757125242250931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256397086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80291206,0.0386316,0.000020238896,0.045956176,0.0001778875,0.0036718477,0.00021134451,0.000022305816,0.10839655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954643,0.002858806,0.00023934167,0.0012902826,0.000033345186,0.000087287655,0.0000070414044,0.0000014474266,0.000018117416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990149,0.000262056,0.00025647867,0.00011173418,0.00018770718,0.00016713084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946314,0.00023288881,0.00007909945,0.000050069495,0.000099362325,0.00007544716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005893119,0.00007630609,0.00025532738,0.000012283695,0.00030851716,0.000042452302,0.00008667829,0.000035501755,0.00021915234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023855305,0.000049756844,0.00004153553,0.000091378155,0.00068054855,0.0001466685,0.000011656457,0.0000669363,0.00000846738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002976663,0.000026014624,0.010980208,0.00088776724,0.000028646798,7.8165124e-7,0.016903093,6.0868587e-7,0.000012500638,0.9625339,0.001724172,0.0068993317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010918013,0.0001636178,0.20211133,0.009429612,0.00016495424,0.00001471398,0.09588222,0.0000082258875,0.0001410718,0.011912348,0.6780894,0.0009907143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6579938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82803637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95062155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006332877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018526881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34428367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256734129","doi":"10.22145/flr.37.3.1","title":"A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Law","score_opus":0.0750247104430044,"score_gpt":0.36557921807687466,"score_spread":0.29055450763387025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256734129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12445675,0.03732121,0.00007000533,0.14431106,0.0014143302,0.011824222,0.00039599548,0.00018386112,0.6800226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95786726,0.00071040954,0.00015876343,0.008776465,0.00020844798,0.00005234914,0.000007437663,0.000004942056,0.032213897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989609,0.00007537199,0.00026531125,0.00015389181,0.00027746064,0.00026704455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994775,0.000054344877,0.00010871778,0.0001777023,0.00008798138,0.000093768766],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002781242,0.00010923906,0.00028957886,0.000006502033,0.00076918944,0.000054350952,0.00028273222,0.00003986097,0.0013529111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020050189,0.000055919325,0.00011852773,0.00006215662,0.00013265229,0.00007229389,0.000007716899,0.000065469394,0.000017724724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000149377565,0.000016670925,0.0000016090552,0.00013854788,0.000009266869,0.0000035835365,0.0003537428,3.3234343e-7,0.0000013245041,0.8853303,0.113947056,0.00018261334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001380453,0.00008927486,0.00003282384,0.0005613354,0.000041996947,0.0000018563073,0.000017378421,0.000012374293,0.000023811768,0.040140826,0.9588206,0.0001196685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47618905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9679613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8451895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063338004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035338657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319844237","doi":"10.1177/0067205x221146335","title":"Active After Sunset<scp>:</scp> The Politics of Judicial Retirements in India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Politics; Institution; Government (linguistics); Language change; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.039228230980859966,"score_gpt":0.3299607964961456,"score_spread":0.29073256551528565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319844237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1633267,0.06090129,0.0000014854522,0.014761307,0.0009095316,0.001634299,0.0001342551,0.00009956094,0.7582316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724835,0.023385426,0.0000048209513,0.003278736,0.00025916062,0.00011742432,0.000006477305,0.0000045000825,0.0004599554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871176,0.00020675545,0.0002525904,0.00013159266,0.00039044666,0.00030686648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994499,0.000252106,0.00008620483,0.000084498366,0.00008147125,0.00004581309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005406194,0.00008730635,0.00024747345,0.000022549697,0.0005947878,0.000020922627,0.00017469589,0.000044383185,0.00005554433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050188886,0.00006206514,0.00009331292,0.00048291867,0.0005983331,0.00008592188,0.0000837045,0.00011177744,0.00013602336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025493612,0.0000246846,0.0056925337,0.00010268235,0.000025955738,0.00001065579,0.0015221243,1.363822e-7,0.0000012824969,0.98302215,0.008459617,0.001135619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011893576,0.000023548011,0.09062914,0.001387542,0.000034632987,4.010884e-7,0.000856962,2.7071755e-7,0.000015663247,0.06162366,0.8452478,0.000061453284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00996665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058590956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9213985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007002725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001538525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362669535","doi":"10.1177/0067205x231165872","title":"Commonwealth Power to Improve Access, Quality, and Efficiency of Medical Care: Does section 51 (xxiiiA) of the <i>Constitution</i> Limit Politically Feasible Health Policy Options Today?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Health Services Management and Policy","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Law; Health care; Politics; Health policy; High Court; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10258129135789634,"score_gpt":0.5146856231739784,"score_spread":0.412104331816082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362669535","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030077407,0.016029747,0.000121888035,0.8696393,0.0027044127,0.009754058,0.0005923634,0.00029505836,0.07078582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7750433,0.037803493,0.000099703364,0.18504019,0.00068937935,0.0005965268,0.000060954913,0.000032076267,0.00063437637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482274,0.0015293066,0.0016299866,0.00035903146,0.00081523956,0.00084368384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997356,0.00046897822,0.0006349037,0.0006480078,0.00029743006,0.0005946789],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033701614,0.00021811789,0.00079373,0.00014785123,0.001440941,0.000028335333,0.0006546746,0.00019229115,0.00021990639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006512843,0.00013896995,0.00014907912,0.0013335565,0.00023406996,0.00018007023,0.00093395234,0.0005626729,0.000069604335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013079584,0.00007094672,0.0062676067,0.03606187,0.000018020248,4.5427876e-7,0.0008285606,0.0000017005207,0.0000061586484,0.94471467,0.010155743,0.0018611883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011379906,0.0003605894,0.083680935,0.017945766,0.000056560824,0.0000029073258,0.00072447123,0.000020371577,0.000012274233,0.004192193,0.89151937,0.00034657874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07620292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018545302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9405225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025275655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025959227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387533621","doi":"10.1177/0067205x231205051","title":"Collective Bargaining in Fissured Work Contexts: An Analysis of Core Challenges and Novel Experiments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Collective bargaining; Legislation; Shadow (psychology); Statutory law; Competition (biology); Labour law; Economics; Labour economics; Bargaining power; Industrial relations; Business; Market economy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Management; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.10571106326510504,"score_gpt":0.35670718146644453,"score_spread":0.2509961182013395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387533621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15806425,0.18168098,0.000070217575,0.0029120897,0.0001632981,0.0018784035,0.000058904956,0.00016790479,0.65500396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97586614,0.023571193,0.000031533415,0.00027382304,0.000010481902,0.000054281627,0.000025111714,0.000003594964,0.0001638511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929696,0.00007151667,0.00024588456,0.00013573674,0.00010865266,0.00014124175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996856,0.00008382886,0.00007380946,0.00006768057,0.000035160447,0.00005390897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000592377,0.00006715656,0.00033748458,0.0000719472,0.00014652788,0.000037511643,0.00007356989,0.000039617127,0.000043650358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045075154,0.00006445244,0.000060118095,0.00073373446,0.000080071484,0.00038390272,0.000011596967,0.000038861876,0.0000048088523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041646865,0.0001533421,0.005290461,0.0004395542,0.00038517072,0.0000031419734,0.05379342,0.00004405854,0.0000044067947,0.84065855,0.00013170557,0.09905454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049898606,0.00085584365,0.3533335,0.02505691,0.0015720287,0.0000016544728,0.048654307,0.0015101442,0.00012297837,0.026431609,0.53498393,0.0024872383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003412978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042796982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8178019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050239418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004784053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26282942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413961078","doi":"10.1017/fed.2025.4","title":"The Place of Federalism in Deliberative Rights Theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Law and economics; Project commissioning; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Publishing; Politics","score_opus":0.015435220683261515,"score_gpt":0.33187318277539335,"score_spread":0.3164379620921318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413961078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011531688,0.09542855,0.00012054424,0.022245165,0.00046964455,0.0014754361,0.0000046273913,0.000041704407,0.8686826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8914679,0.03879955,0.00012839805,0.007037645,0.00013265824,0.00015693884,0.000008677466,0.000008159332,0.06226005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985397,0.0007448317,0.000288246,0.000116256946,0.00015299344,0.00015800113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993974,0.0002926399,0.000081546794,0.00012584035,0.00007888713,0.000023712464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012479541,0.00007311711,0.00019131762,0.000014962113,0.0012130453,0.000098476936,0.00017997225,0.00003583761,0.00014281253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081425664,0.000039218983,0.000068717454,0.00015731674,0.00024372627,0.00014228764,0.00001881705,0.000093890536,0.0000181277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055180567,0.000012518611,0.000009251253,0.00007129847,0.0000073148017,5.474383e-7,0.000902284,3.168244e-7,0.0000015009775,0.9880115,0.007997622,0.0029803466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007894795,0.000009237895,0.00015719561,0.0010795939,0.0000077530485,8.883667e-8,0.00007912938,0.000002537267,0.00003755488,0.15266007,0.845837,0.000050878956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004484584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09814369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8799362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054518918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103300365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9329887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}