{"meta":{"query_hash":"8cf335a9af1d","filters":{"venue":"Federal Law Review"},"cohort_total":34,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"exported":34,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8cf335a9af1d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Federal+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2211104402","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.1.7","title":"Time to Get Serious about Privacy Policies: The Special Case of Genetic Privacy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy policy; Information privacy; Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; Business; Consumer privacy; Privacy by Design; Genetic testing; FTC Fair Information Practice; Relation (database); Project commissioning; Privacy law; Privacy rights; Publishing; Law; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.030129494408833633,"score_gpt":0.3106534458376723,"score_spread":0.2805239514288387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211104402","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09459903,0.0040309224,0.026280032,0.70853335,0.000977504,0.00012937584,0.00007482546,0.00007759024,0.16529745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8965256,0.0016050227,0.008034395,0.07984204,0.0006429995,0.00011453052,0.000030072888,0.00006187905,0.013143524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9324571,0.038075257,0.00248013,0.004394788,0.012817176,0.009775542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89498067,0.08336484,0.0054604085,0.0073041413,0.0056687146,0.0032212047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060943574,0.00029526942,0.0010364935,0.0015318765,0.014878899,0.019258393,0.0025593487,0.023541646,0.0058862623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077512406,0.0006967245,0.0013842923,0.0020560336,0.04940148,0.020369895,0.0098971715,0.028670358,0.0006442711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033383505,0.000025176034,0.0016277588,0.000053233656,0.000016043477,0.0019123105,0.031570774,0.0002815043,0.0003075346,0.94319123,0.010555813,0.010425186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003547199,0.000082167484,0.0030379468,0.0010447325,0.000049231963,0.0031515923,0.054860145,0.0013779906,0.001133167,0.66822475,0.2668808,0.00012208617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018654184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014420942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060943574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012417795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02079134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32230425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226395077","doi":"10.22145/flr.37.1.1","title":"The Proscription of Terrorist Organisations in Australia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proscription; Terrorism; Legitimacy; Political science; Commonwealth; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04677800223217879,"score_gpt":0.37506266296255236,"score_spread":0.32828466073037355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226395077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12248963,0.3150788,0.0017851441,0.06783191,0.0037939104,0.00024673736,0.00014022303,0.000029450595,0.48860413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6495845,0.19845332,0.0018677545,0.035043787,0.0015114694,0.00022363315,0.00015329664,0.000029295315,0.11313294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899109,0.0042287135,0.0006841606,0.0004585526,0.00397482,0.00074277155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98991126,0.0037501135,0.0015862688,0.00042008635,0.0038755124,0.00045681355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007083461,0.00020242337,0.0004567095,0.0029732976,0.0035128552,0.0041445605,0.00082244084,0.0029885662,0.0022591958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013768947,0.00058956695,0.0003151351,0.0022493738,0.0041278615,0.0023717112,0.0022895432,0.0038111615,0.0004951516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014837272,0.00021013575,0.005890691,0.0037158611,0.00009037653,0.0017586617,0.024271142,0.0012854108,0.0026517846,0.63507,0.09288064,0.23202701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035700417,0.00018950363,0.036656447,0.0026050094,0.000059669208,0.00061851623,0.0032745274,0.0003397916,0.0009619832,0.012673229,0.9425079,0.00007764281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1360509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15081109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1360509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007939936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01756647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27051795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266143053","doi":"10.22145/flr.39.1.6","title":"The Process of Law Reform: Conditions for Success","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law reform; Law; Politics; Public law; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Project commissioning; Publishing","score_opus":0.06468398277748962,"score_gpt":0.38638811212857493,"score_spread":0.32170412935108533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266143053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121898904,0.007036861,0.010901492,0.4379884,0.0009929107,0.0013564558,0.00021057972,0.00024541566,0.41936895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96824247,0.0016594034,0.0037010992,0.008793857,0.00067920296,0.0006577605,0.00007673771,0.00011604677,0.016073532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9462465,0.0178861,0.0018846884,0.0032475688,0.012257536,0.018477507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83331263,0.08186635,0.012951639,0.0071778772,0.023216676,0.041474838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054856863,0.0004371958,0.0009638297,0.0029492837,0.016752359,0.03179977,0.001594007,0.013114401,0.01882196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11581083,0.0005880968,0.00065773545,0.0028613585,0.03484772,0.020476526,0.014163255,0.01134316,0.003618708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016415877,0.0007354098,0.013856051,0.00030753744,0.00002427321,0.0006551473,0.019548329,0.00045490352,0.0004913462,0.8881059,0.027884806,0.047772158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003302788,0.00049844483,0.027651401,0.0011983715,0.00003525306,0.00047438312,0.061210506,0.0016211838,0.0010614234,0.6433542,0.2623867,0.00017796096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072513036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007432311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054856863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011101944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047870442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29011428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269084978","doi":"10.22145/flr.31.2.2","title":"Burdened by Proof: How the Australian Refugee Review Tribunal has Failed Lesbian and Gay Asylum Seekers","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Refugee; Lesbian; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Project commissioning; Criminology; Refugee law; Sociology; Publishing; Gender studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.05716202341117506,"score_gpt":0.31529697470194257,"score_spread":0.2581349512907675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269084978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54151255,0.0077996645,0.0015811208,0.33533663,0.0015933758,0.00014935562,0.000055415843,0.000059626163,0.11191218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9169827,0.0012863643,0.00042302915,0.048825234,0.00031688242,0.000069807065,0.000016546164,0.00004389228,0.03203552],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96026105,0.018599378,0.0015447183,0.0029770243,0.007066374,0.00955148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491938,0.025010485,0.0041818665,0.0025456387,0.009522088,0.009546105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05179718,0.0003130092,0.00096677913,0.0027759797,0.050842118,0.022674719,0.0041790083,0.017310273,0.0064870585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11265309,0.0010813433,0.00068692456,0.0021372216,0.023764707,0.00741983,0.012061396,0.015946763,0.0008728202],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012448,0.0001942104,0.019120572,0.0003104309,0.00009319121,0.008891296,0.48938334,0.0004627587,0.00088680617,0.36516827,0.06725891,0.048105802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008948488,0.00030826166,0.059046175,0.0010409699,0.00016177526,0.0020988097,0.3459248,0.0015431802,0.0010628524,0.050061066,0.5382965,0.00036609688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39087588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5010131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39087588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023448508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04340745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7772014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277183366","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.1.3","title":"Proroguing the Parliament of Australia: The Effect on the Senate and the Conventions that Constrain the Prerogative Power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Commonwealth; Prerogative; Constitution; Law; Scrutiny; Politics; Political science; Power (physics); House of Commons; Sociology","score_opus":0.06500949117634366,"score_gpt":0.35622047821575353,"score_spread":0.29121098703940984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277183366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46489525,0.0034804046,0.0023499734,0.046754528,0.00035812607,0.00010510067,0.00010057432,0.000070610455,0.4818854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545314,0.0006231628,0.0004939136,0.0047381395,0.0000875052,0.000051785624,0.000014766405,0.000033302862,0.039426062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795679,0.011249253,0.0006374938,0.0009864529,0.0042868056,0.0032722286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97847235,0.010463161,0.0024734274,0.0012350329,0.0048985723,0.0024575305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010308339,0.00022365442,0.00038716246,0.0013332303,0.0096725,0.008231725,0.0010700057,0.0025730734,0.007904083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022826597,0.00058295525,0.00036336726,0.0010254786,0.0106596695,0.0026214086,0.008141715,0.004981069,0.0009884862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040590073,0.00017146888,0.030646754,0.00050083676,0.00012452887,0.0019172342,0.06445603,0.001378762,0.0072034854,0.80713195,0.021147752,0.06491537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013318037,0.00074106635,0.29708463,0.0015461936,0.00021764197,0.00075526105,0.039171074,0.0031118577,0.009082173,0.07007155,0.5776566,0.00042871555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1724175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31779853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1724175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012507437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017615674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34282786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336534342","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.1.9","title":"Realising the Public Potential of Corporate Law: Twenty Years of Civil Penalty Enforcement in Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Fiduciary; Public law; Corporate law; Private law; Commercial law; Corporate governance; Law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Enforcement; Corporate group; Municipal law; Administrative law; Political science; Comparative law; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.0817171552472051,"score_gpt":0.3426131843189589,"score_spread":0.2608960290717538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336534342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5918462,0.032890245,0.0026761985,0.25981578,0.0016354001,0.00016386122,0.00003904231,0.0000315847,0.11090152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96173394,0.008067375,0.0007603853,0.014148602,0.0004845829,0.000034118002,0.000009366153,0.00002015744,0.0147414245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98801893,0.0047489055,0.00050790963,0.0010148147,0.0037864735,0.0019230205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646376,0.020807756,0.003974529,0.0014979859,0.004924643,0.0041575916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018476255,0.00020166876,0.00043220917,0.002156993,0.010948744,0.013569692,0.0014558973,0.009775241,0.0038285477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024691993,0.0007991913,0.00048580853,0.0015873603,0.022992292,0.008004524,0.008320593,0.012367622,0.00032933193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010947529,0.0005620026,0.011137775,0.0009798667,0.000048798905,0.0050340244,0.3690244,0.00090307347,0.0024976798,0.4835889,0.016831048,0.10928287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037355232,0.00053707755,0.08940594,0.0035915682,0.00005486236,0.0011755411,0.10338694,0.002674268,0.0017921998,0.051834386,0.7452706,0.00023923302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09023125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16484895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09023125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023221318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029978974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17941207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341114917","doi":"10.22145/flr.43.2.4","title":"Meeting Australia's Labour Needs: The Case for a New Low-Skill Work Visa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Economic shortage; Work (physics); Backdoor; Labour economics; Migrant workers; Project commissioning; Business; Gig economy; Political science; Public relations; Economics; Engineering; Publishing; Labour law; Economic growth; Law; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.07370987631042583,"score_gpt":0.3649032628772893,"score_spread":0.29119338656686344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341114917","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16056252,0.014545163,0.003147735,0.64099663,0.0020711906,0.00018753765,0.000053054395,0.00006614947,0.17837006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73976624,0.008237394,0.004491892,0.1792727,0.0010154295,0.00027757382,0.000033533423,0.000045390367,0.06685991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932656,0.0024958418,0.00035662146,0.0006119573,0.001698824,0.0015711127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913401,0.0031796189,0.00069488346,0.0006115724,0.0021881636,0.0019856317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010779822,0.0001643844,0.00043727856,0.0009422326,0.007865082,0.0055053276,0.0017127286,0.0088916365,0.0036442305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01236637,0.00041866396,0.00058578304,0.00051578874,0.0073304186,0.004439081,0.006009338,0.009486721,0.00046259345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006343248,0.00021467856,0.009828912,0.0007365349,0.00004913228,0.0026457515,0.036160875,0.0007802712,0.002367064,0.74912584,0.09744894,0.100578435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051480372,0.00020828527,0.027871232,0.001727163,0.00006527719,0.00080660905,0.015203262,0.00093028997,0.00050217175,0.062875025,0.8896727,0.00008650149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13084039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18274802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13084039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005859914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032076366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26015764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601966673","doi":"10.22145/flr.43.3.1","title":"Constitutional Incongruence: Explaining the Failure of the Council of the Australian Federation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Politics; Corporate governance; Project commissioning; Political science; Public administration; Publishing; Law; Sociology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.13042088907990232,"score_gpt":0.3405398591506105,"score_spread":0.2101189700707082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601966673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34070772,0.0037314827,0.009028798,0.2077768,0.00094494165,0.00014488772,0.000116844334,0.00009155531,0.43745697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874139,0.00028015554,0.00068737654,0.003894385,0.000091235095,0.000033479213,0.000009612853,0.000014662409,0.0075752526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772918,0.0105070155,0.0007453134,0.0021996857,0.005428751,0.0038273665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724392,0.015039608,0.002139531,0.0023048504,0.0058950065,0.0021818897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03189438,0.0002087475,0.00052092626,0.0029097286,0.024293406,0.008646299,0.0032327285,0.009252863,0.0037955802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04649914,0.0006332696,0.0003997752,0.0024896706,0.044917177,0.0060416176,0.0073000886,0.0100636585,0.00027976223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008084007,0.000012462109,0.0011021898,0.000020816316,0.0000039278893,0.00033391293,0.034986205,0.00014749759,0.00006074083,0.9555694,0.004911075,0.002843783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045274886,0.000082092694,0.016429484,0.00071842025,0.00005193044,0.0005511724,0.07085438,0.0036497302,0.00059586,0.47800395,0.42884994,0.00016770474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40742797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35346642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40742797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038619738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028907763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81011295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781112312","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.10","title":"Justiciability, Access to Justice and the Development of Constitutional Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Duty; Justiciability; Political science; Government (linguistics); Common law; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Economic Justice; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.07835296890226545,"score_gpt":0.3644354827945134,"score_spread":0.2860825138922479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781112312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17068698,0.009734509,0.002781246,0.06540955,0.00028436992,0.00018308392,0.00052167795,0.00006685206,0.7503317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686763,0.0028057455,0.0009959999,0.0019469112,0.000037196507,0.000025968113,0.00007778634,0.000018960412,0.025415175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99228257,0.0009450071,0.00018979779,0.00047916672,0.0033235746,0.0027798838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98604923,0.004469835,0.0007378658,0.0005012083,0.005378031,0.0028638688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052098967,0.0002098999,0.0004793027,0.0029290859,0.01967807,0.011350707,0.0017937876,0.0022106562,0.010567792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018155672,0.00031694808,0.00029548455,0.0035657114,0.01695552,0.0024881032,0.0034126395,0.004411246,0.00022057419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015079331,0.000025454929,0.0042029344,0.00006343957,0.000009260023,0.00020837589,0.0063067833,0.0007011892,0.00014755741,0.96098906,0.011686031,0.015644848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007549439,0.000051454677,0.073938966,0.0007326339,0.00006742664,0.00022753846,0.022257842,0.0033971942,0.0008555439,0.19705041,0.7011257,0.00021970738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1727167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1727167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29428494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95953137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781327244","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.6","title":"Re-Evaluating the Doctrine of Deference in Administrative Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Doctrine; Administrative law; Political science; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Judicial review; Common law; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Project commissioning; High Court; Sociology; Publishing","score_opus":0.2729267636078582,"score_gpt":0.5032675907602394,"score_spread":0.2303408271523812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781327244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13221967,0.06959441,0.04206462,0.27211457,0.0048186057,0.00022043835,0.00010142161,0.00010914446,0.4787571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615943,0.0057210717,0.0046211686,0.015625505,0.0014067683,0.000054785538,0.000017723813,0.000030444626,0.010928223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9647372,0.016211929,0.0013689577,0.0013726023,0.013028975,0.0032803246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90420264,0.06563785,0.0032826245,0.004598863,0.020446654,0.0018313332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042986047,0.00037111188,0.0009787878,0.0052937735,0.0055600265,0.011611193,0.0037461624,0.007488395,0.0025095684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071081005,0.00047800466,0.0008203545,0.0026737181,0.03145259,0.009840304,0.0057999385,0.011412905,0.00047106075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014171749,0.000015896405,0.0003161005,0.000084213476,0.000008215851,0.00016054952,0.0034630692,0.0003320085,0.00008857191,0.98413116,0.0034924278,0.007893595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043219,0.00012938963,0.0038338965,0.0019379852,0.0000709933,0.00032702266,0.0065169344,0.0027863998,0.000680557,0.7815584,0.20200922,0.00010597216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0851214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076974586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0851214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018312948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021218644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22733468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802150874","doi":"10.22145/flr.46.1.6","title":"The Survival of Reasonableness Review: Confirming the Boundaries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Standard of review; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Proportionality (law); Political science; Substantive law; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.056110595003917504,"score_gpt":0.37315237777572585,"score_spread":0.31704178277180833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802150874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11219417,0.0127202235,0.08196475,0.51991326,0.0050086225,0.00029044866,0.00008630931,0.00023035567,0.26759186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95776546,0.0010821624,0.010457744,0.022035556,0.0009864473,0.00011016474,0.000025209494,0.000060700353,0.0074765147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.902535,0.06151546,0.0039698454,0.006933124,0.018599318,0.0064472416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5759746,0.28510565,0.023298025,0.032333553,0.074369565,0.008918583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12086005,0.00023088767,0.0011201442,0.002944806,0.01009669,0.016545355,0.002788653,0.0104937,0.0043647913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32423547,0.00060727034,0.00058198214,0.0013818665,0.050709862,0.020056207,0.008846139,0.014657,0.0008861653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044235174,0.000019263825,0.0011637391,0.000088332126,0.000010965286,0.00021420466,0.0053091124,0.0002944598,0.00018360674,0.9664285,0.006996209,0.01924748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005073968,0.00013922184,0.003149752,0.0012679388,0.000039228897,0.0002171542,0.004748062,0.0023040883,0.0012104274,0.8684575,0.11831676,0.000099070516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021215916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014983068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12086005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016122656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03538585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63917667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912109766","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1804600304","title":"‘Pretaliatory’ Enforcement Action for Chilling Whistleblowing through Corporate Agreements: Lessons from North America","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Enforcement; Legislation; Business; Misconduct; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Law; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.48585332385580543,"score_gpt":0.4817691846553312,"score_spread":0.004084139200474235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912109766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22756699,0.0049163545,0.0053347843,0.1718044,0.0009018751,0.00019967787,0.00007369898,0.00011726284,0.589085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86830205,0.0044510867,0.004172297,0.07527779,0.00026115583,0.0002449353,0.000061448874,0.00008504004,0.047144238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887455,0.0054561067,0.00028052102,0.0008880273,0.0022222968,0.0024075895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96787304,0.018330278,0.0015478303,0.0017570253,0.007917234,0.0025745793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015284549,0.00024391423,0.0003872481,0.0011480707,0.01602674,0.007707071,0.002420991,0.0070441035,0.006140318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02230844,0.00045852462,0.00070735003,0.0011388883,0.010970629,0.0062978463,0.0050803768,0.010200048,0.0006976836],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016149545,0.0010517678,0.031481173,0.00039924122,0.000083868676,0.00403704,0.12895802,0.0015339184,0.0013066799,0.5957427,0.10180979,0.13343427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019053742,0.0003113131,0.054776795,0.0025488532,0.0001530471,0.0008490005,0.123575374,0.003057376,0.0017546227,0.1033981,0.70911264,0.0002723857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.498151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65652287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.498151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017548267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040274106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913281582","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1804600411","title":"The Dilemma of Indigenous Self-Government in Canada: Indigenous Rights and Canadian Federalism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous rights; Sovereignty; Federalism; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Constitution; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Dual federalism; Minority rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015484743323703483,"score_gpt":0.26154858220707594,"score_spread":0.24606383888337247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913281582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07006546,0.20868795,0.0016337403,0.2987875,0.0010796577,0.000061320636,0.00049092853,0.0000434855,0.41914994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91375965,0.049114894,0.0009058876,0.016397482,0.00027917768,0.000027622067,0.00011277033,0.000016562377,0.019385915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543977,0.0008552602,0.00009713347,0.0003073131,0.0019709864,0.0013293619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445796,0.0019326673,0.00026627744,0.00018112261,0.0025261987,0.00063578045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004138112,0.00017083286,0.00043892776,0.0023105799,0.010678493,0.00703234,0.0017634378,0.0027538221,0.0038649016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007597606,0.00017965556,0.00028535438,0.0040451773,0.013877012,0.002051616,0.0017414851,0.0028558061,0.000117669166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019003375,0.000012277461,0.0014819829,0.00029446243,0.000021292028,0.00017034721,0.0049515152,0.000547464,0.00008871053,0.9382989,0.032153994,0.021960068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057178742,0.000028502678,0.02432741,0.0031953608,0.00014928041,0.00018984116,0.018750634,0.0012535601,0.0004288741,0.14859098,0.8029165,0.00011180533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12359313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12359313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21551485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89673513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934112569","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19831805","title":"Finding the Foothold: Freedom of Political Association in the Australian <i>Constitution</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Constitution; Corollary; Politics; Law; Political communication; Supreme court; Political freedom; Jurisprudence; Freedom of the press; Political science; Sociology; Association (psychology); Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.033459419538779914,"score_gpt":0.3270030402620783,"score_spread":0.2935436207232984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2934112569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10695703,0.004562066,0.008231281,0.064986266,0.00096542516,0.00018894978,0.00026926267,0.000036546542,0.81380314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95740443,0.0009647618,0.0012821819,0.007364753,0.00041542793,0.00012174996,0.000086523054,0.000017696118,0.03234247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780568,0.009030219,0.0012757498,0.002244961,0.006411888,0.0029803507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799096,0.012796546,0.0011825082,0.002221723,0.0031430332,0.0007466672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021023996,0.00021734,0.00082660216,0.0027414672,0.008708832,0.012239056,0.0017040304,0.007354517,0.007991453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029383756,0.0006836115,0.00068006193,0.0017980079,0.026026815,0.0057468237,0.0066947406,0.010228669,0.0009076535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009930376,0.000010096564,0.00029066906,0.00003136401,0.0000050189637,0.00011092286,0.002208897,0.00009163088,0.0001238688,0.99192154,0.0025603834,0.0026357109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006363007,0.000095844334,0.01058964,0.000921948,0.00007936066,0.00018867048,0.0032051,0.0010826574,0.0008255399,0.78894323,0.1939055,0.00009886318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07132162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065631665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07132162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010199442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014539199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14181292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989922706","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19890443","title":"Re-evaluating the Collateral Challenge in the Era of Statutory Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Particle Physics","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Collateral; Legislature; Law; Statutory law; Legislative intent; Political science; Law and economics; Entitlement (fair division); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06463917718911977,"score_gpt":0.39831135338932117,"score_spread":0.3336721762002014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989922706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0516658,0.012002774,0.063811585,0.31551176,0.004580575,0.00023661675,0.00015391727,0.00024498536,0.551792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91406417,0.0032059918,0.012959742,0.029682942,0.0048216856,0.00026288503,0.000057133882,0.00021782795,0.034727704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93647355,0.033003278,0.0028746508,0.004815275,0.0186589,0.004174399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90192825,0.0677193,0.0040041963,0.009207746,0.015160505,0.0019800519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06401256,0.00057041575,0.0014921998,0.0037896372,0.0086279465,0.022863789,0.0049817283,0.023897877,0.00719121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095682144,0.0008231029,0.0013309543,0.0019093333,0.04166842,0.024490045,0.009659276,0.02394124,0.0020327477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011351783,0.000009319519,0.00012648554,0.000025730644,0.00000442796,0.0001811345,0.0012388949,0.00016820288,0.00010826199,0.9917576,0.0038297658,0.0025388917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031057712,0.00007311818,0.0005711094,0.00068579806,0.00004104007,0.00027175198,0.0016109135,0.0022922265,0.0009645421,0.8596437,0.13373245,0.000082257364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009404047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0147117125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06401256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015517424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017376699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33853483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992013934","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19892363","title":"Withdrawn: Knighthoods and the Order of Australia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Prime minister; Prime (order theory); Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Operations research; Sociology; Engineering; Mathematics; Business; Combinatorics; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.034121007454672045,"score_gpt":0.3490452409046103,"score_spread":0.31492423344993825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992013934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06793264,0.026277032,0.0012397292,0.2044204,0.0032509184,0.00010968115,0.00021053368,0.00003765873,0.69652134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5744519,0.011454955,0.00075284165,0.059337955,0.0013166794,0.000074083946,0.000092027316,0.000038965256,0.3524806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953591,0.0010411554,0.00030205538,0.0006225893,0.0017925664,0.0008824537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616194,0.0014245835,0.00044255302,0.00023918108,0.0013003016,0.00043134854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029310766,0.00021454421,0.00040460163,0.0010262346,0.009087944,0.0075821583,0.0010912888,0.006497174,0.0071448656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01030994,0.00038793738,0.00034340736,0.0011114548,0.010939597,0.004283117,0.003966388,0.008523549,0.0010412837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014222737,0.000015615571,0.001024314,0.00012989438,0.000007254564,0.00031990645,0.01588144,0.000078555044,0.00021322462,0.92998284,0.0405297,0.011802995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014450705,0.000047282327,0.0086833825,0.00057377206,0.000019903156,0.00022071826,0.0066154767,0.00016092902,0.00030211825,0.055614907,0.92770433,0.00004274198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25141913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30709174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25141913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010511534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02362989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49991143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085997748","doi":"10.1177/0067205x20955069","title":"Indigenous Constitutionalism and Dispute Resolution Outside the Courts: An Invitation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Indigenous rights; Institution; Political science; Liberalism; Supreme court; Sociology; Constitutional law; Human rights; Democracy","score_opus":0.06827181375930244,"score_gpt":0.3446184206711721,"score_spread":0.27634660691186963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085997748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060141124,0.03900836,0.0076046437,0.20716228,0.00090905675,0.00008432248,0.00006515477,0.000042125852,0.6849829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95340985,0.0075335475,0.0015155595,0.011410227,0.00059986487,0.000047785663,0.000018994324,0.000014617887,0.025449578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914274,0.003652553,0.00017644528,0.00049762527,0.0024031745,0.0018427079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899743,0.0066537037,0.00044759805,0.0006063563,0.0018625915,0.0004553848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008531829,0.00014018815,0.000317007,0.0015311511,0.008778594,0.009681008,0.001532404,0.003777085,0.0038894762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0110967215,0.00021765438,0.0003864311,0.0016590789,0.024840603,0.0037083675,0.0039762165,0.0038456114,0.00018469033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040519994,0.0000098551845,0.0003031403,0.00004070693,0.000003846896,0.00009438047,0.0039493665,0.00014487516,0.00007036975,0.98702973,0.0034776407,0.0048720776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046594425,0.000040151357,0.006073157,0.0008766372,0.000059614566,0.00027267274,0.018355763,0.0014543288,0.00073354895,0.47167847,0.50035465,0.00005454812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5382903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6676445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5382903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025084773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04713602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92885756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086727983","doi":"10.1177/0067205x20955068","title":"A First Nations Voice: Institutionalising Political Listening","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Politics; Democracy; Public administration; Legislature; State (computer science); Political science; Corporate governance; Institution; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Management; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08724136824589092,"score_gpt":0.37684570165123693,"score_spread":0.289604333405346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086727983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09992759,0.0025352659,0.03187707,0.08024366,0.00065550033,0.00010380413,0.00001968762,0.00012699755,0.7845104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856821,0.00043698782,0.0020587877,0.002986583,0.00012652978,0.00004439064,0.0000046699747,0.000019703486,0.008640213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819279,0.014495491,0.00028106378,0.0006913892,0.001128735,0.0014753657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827466,0.01168872,0.001292023,0.0012236187,0.0011453875,0.0019036062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02182071,0.00020336453,0.00024023505,0.0014495531,0.0069478964,0.012045946,0.0011686638,0.003463906,0.0068961205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019156685,0.00024974323,0.0002670575,0.0007264346,0.037729494,0.0062894607,0.008648388,0.0046640243,0.00049200456],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010097052,0.000028940693,0.000975235,0.00004350836,0.0000036810457,0.00018617061,0.055535063,0.00016290408,0.00034067122,0.92027575,0.004041848,0.018396076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029784915,0.00011618572,0.006605698,0.00086974085,0.000021269476,0.0003425424,0.09553629,0.0011597733,0.00090456597,0.5951411,0.29920927,0.000063666164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005839164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012322529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99416083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043271896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008379879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115400314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122253256","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.2.4","title":"Investor-State Arbitration: The Roadmap from the Multilateral Agreement on Investment to the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Investment protection; International trade; Treaty; Investment (military); Business; General partnership; Multinational corporation; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Position (finance); State (computer science); Law; Finance; Foreign direct investment; Political science; International investment; Politics","score_opus":0.05175145912435978,"score_gpt":0.2693442461313393,"score_spread":0.2175927870069795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122253256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026045635,0.02688979,0.03518663,0.16739747,0.0012534886,0.00023147064,0.000098288634,0.00014859,0.7427486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8860932,0.019740507,0.01698627,0.0233562,0.0012375099,0.00031697488,0.00011542655,0.00006731353,0.05208663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861415,0.0064155827,0.0007363053,0.0009346701,0.00459014,0.0011817743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983045,0.0114378445,0.0009604709,0.0011710001,0.0026859322,0.00069971307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02555754,0.00027374568,0.0003840789,0.001768207,0.0028627573,0.011751305,0.0019280979,0.0075430777,0.007311158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023386812,0.0003905804,0.0006259537,0.0019265815,0.009185761,0.008537123,0.0059075537,0.008939729,0.0006580374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034364273,0.000011731557,0.00009842789,0.00003855094,0.0000021628719,0.000058153866,0.0004692269,0.00025009506,0.000034030723,0.98559314,0.0035273887,0.009913642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023627435,0.0000677846,0.0016812977,0.0007108431,0.000012167198,0.0001563336,0.001164265,0.0021635075,0.00034032186,0.5867433,0.4069012,0.00003537001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013662296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010099965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02555754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058488296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014509347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13516277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122934301","doi":"10.22145/flr.38.3.5","title":"Judiciaries in Crisis — Some Comparative Perspectives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Meaning (existential); Political science; Power (physics); Executive power; Law; Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0490169392290615,"score_gpt":0.363439455138616,"score_spread":0.3144225159095545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122934301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016069764,0.23287438,0.00063078804,0.107153825,0.0015681183,0.000021036858,0.00009370036,0.000011585681,0.64157677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86118877,0.0962661,0.0003928368,0.015574077,0.003971768,0.00009109489,0.00012062085,0.00003749875,0.02235721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99180156,0.00531598,0.00018423812,0.00028045362,0.0009934661,0.0014243318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912566,0.005995106,0.00052266516,0.00025214558,0.0011447448,0.0008286599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054473444,0.0004705527,0.0007606372,0.008543805,0.008223453,0.018221749,0.0019229137,0.0065102438,0.0144523205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010298226,0.00032516135,0.00035094947,0.009494314,0.021874312,0.010437977,0.0054537165,0.0066893334,0.0010167966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002255822,0.00003339082,0.00030242064,0.00011814162,0.000006838918,0.00012371494,0.008105211,0.00010417127,0.000025484676,0.9672761,0.016275426,0.0076065604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000589718,0.000063182975,0.006453898,0.0019396087,0.000013128692,0.00030296374,0.07822907,0.00038292416,0.000098525874,0.27956837,0.6328671,0.000022212605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016708087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023843333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023472251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023472251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005154097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17030388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123103951","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.3.3","title":"The Honour of the Dead – the Moral Right of Integrity Post-Mortem","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Law; Prejudice (legal term); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.02856023272696993,"score_gpt":0.3116974059079512,"score_spread":0.28313717318098125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123103951","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020963874,0.53811747,0.0028042456,0.14009029,0.0026441247,0.000056231867,0.00008645772,0.000020881227,0.29521644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70508665,0.22290513,0.0011212149,0.02868128,0.0028647832,0.00005496537,0.000055950186,0.000021273836,0.039208777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98707634,0.007685246,0.0005335213,0.000654852,0.003179053,0.0008709609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787062,0.014284007,0.0019462305,0.001067412,0.0034759361,0.0005203073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126379905,0.0001621217,0.0006304585,0.0016716182,0.0026041735,0.0049833716,0.0009720682,0.0046314257,0.0031308522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02427795,0.00021191446,0.000342425,0.0011112272,0.015878612,0.0042043016,0.0017374859,0.004829603,0.0006879361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046588808,0.0000483783,0.0010866226,0.0013455891,0.000036308145,0.0002473441,0.004659132,0.00025257925,0.000386193,0.85634804,0.038043123,0.09750008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026194608,0.00019515019,0.014073618,0.010590197,0.00008879101,0.0005015532,0.0041845036,0.00025561845,0.000638357,0.2589602,0.7104223,0.000063611296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023112858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029396309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023112858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052925535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0090399375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06683689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124358534","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.3.4","title":"Open Justice: Concepts and Judicial Approaches","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Statute; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.14178998189936715,"score_gpt":0.40267549561988003,"score_spread":0.2608855137205129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124358534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016620664,0.035681598,0.10643374,0.07362445,0.001780015,0.0001937372,0.00007107061,0.00008135335,0.76551336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9280857,0.010665297,0.019200448,0.00957034,0.0019888165,0.0004234003,0.000038309096,0.00006368681,0.029964011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9635691,0.020016383,0.0014367271,0.002950038,0.008815254,0.0032124615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669371,0.023557981,0.0025025234,0.002152343,0.0036249247,0.0012251395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03144035,0.00058990443,0.0009988929,0.0069789337,0.011252357,0.02148028,0.004384411,0.010591126,0.0042352057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029380953,0.0005706977,0.0012272443,0.0054244497,0.1185242,0.014995909,0.009305651,0.012049362,0.0005605785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.3769192e-7,0.0000014230111,0.00000952037,0.000006207371,5.031009e-7,0.00000594847,0.0003950352,0.00003065716,0.0000027265212,0.9988456,0.00023825634,0.00046381168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028130596,0.00000437428,0.00006705656,0.00011793139,0.0000022180227,0.000018469154,0.0009158987,0.00024283279,0.000019079374,0.9808358,0.017768703,0.000004885454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015546303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011177078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03144035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01898109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015708832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16627443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125224730","doi":"10.22145/flr.41.1.6","title":"Considering Canadian Approaches to Equality in the Context of Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Law; Project commissioning; High Court; Political science; Publishing; Racism; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.16254608544722277,"score_gpt":0.33825860967231586,"score_spread":0.1757125242250931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125224730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11014769,0.031234805,0.0017040274,0.36441204,0.002207353,0.00018925295,0.00024942684,0.000055675566,0.4897998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90890807,0.00969965,0.0023380616,0.03528448,0.00041697948,0.000089825706,0.00007342773,0.0000250186,0.043164562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795131,0.0052801166,0.0005180669,0.001189081,0.0052806833,0.008218908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824676,0.007483348,0.0005369065,0.0006247477,0.006383421,0.0025039243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019785427,0.00042109514,0.0009543616,0.0041984147,0.030882474,0.017082458,0.003971266,0.009216913,0.006300676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019307284,0.00041003138,0.00081510766,0.004560062,0.027404232,0.0042493986,0.006156953,0.009853582,0.00023706815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030611245,0.000023828696,0.0010948178,0.00017483038,0.00002238409,0.00045316335,0.035563197,0.000446666,0.00028763365,0.9296656,0.017722134,0.014515139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006150269,0.00010039506,0.01866304,0.0015590994,0.00019510335,0.00028718277,0.12825663,0.001017058,0.0007905296,0.11733615,0.7313719,0.00036142656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98616934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17670277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17670277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26571295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9549081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238265016","doi":"10.22145/flr.36.3.1","title":"The Dangers of Shared Care Legislation: Why Australia Needs (Yet More) Family Law Reform","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law reform; Family law; Project commissioning; Law; Political science; Publishing","score_opus":0.07022404376108987,"score_gpt":0.3400619872985388,"score_spread":0.26983794353744894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238265016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09122064,0.014674732,0.001533646,0.8523049,0.0013438674,0.000083128376,0.00004331426,0.00004225951,0.038753476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68436265,0.0087363385,0.0041981717,0.27111578,0.0010424182,0.00013446878,0.00005318944,0.000054926393,0.030302117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97809863,0.008585189,0.00082751794,0.0014668476,0.0069187456,0.004103097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96366763,0.01403091,0.0031439739,0.0016504789,0.011257779,0.006249245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02799746,0.00017837997,0.0005453855,0.0012942201,0.009350637,0.007540604,0.002274669,0.009833974,0.005326303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054068133,0.0005594096,0.0007351306,0.0013294321,0.00827364,0.008163075,0.0055739144,0.011379763,0.00062458724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000912919,0.0003062134,0.021346526,0.0010576174,0.00007610931,0.002072182,0.05144029,0.0004913274,0.0019403108,0.61180294,0.16772237,0.14165282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087634915,0.00040431996,0.08719522,0.003122968,0.000090701404,0.0011339018,0.030049426,0.001726633,0.00092417415,0.08899556,0.7860881,0.00018139547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18658645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2511615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18658645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014802713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04627138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37100077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239403724","doi":"10.22145/flr.28.3.2","title":"The Amicus Curiae and Intervener in the High Court of Australia: A Comparative Analysis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; High Court; Law","score_opus":0.0715606218552786,"score_gpt":0.37732520514611634,"score_spread":0.3057645832908377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239403724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78253525,0.013362915,0.00049111806,0.008149682,0.00010237454,0.000096756245,0.000045373872,0.0000058174505,0.19521077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859729,0.0035921899,0.00018801824,0.0011374984,0.000055173292,0.000051402058,0.000020700723,0.000006626907,0.008975523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890477,0.0056675104,0.00025791166,0.00035819202,0.0023063535,0.0023624573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990126,0.0054101637,0.0013397137,0.00025940617,0.002053733,0.0008109973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005914065,0.00018718014,0.0006565436,0.0055349865,0.008339523,0.0055060512,0.0011429316,0.0022426706,0.0049321637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023844447,0.00036168916,0.00035545978,0.0056835893,0.007111789,0.0028231323,0.0037984287,0.0030631549,0.00043909976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020302592,0.0004300556,0.026236163,0.000688862,0.00011450996,0.0027980115,0.16216901,0.000747125,0.0008519592,0.7371319,0.010604994,0.058024406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010073459,0.0007110237,0.53258353,0.0025317613,0.00043014926,0.0016067274,0.20384751,0.002967482,0.00091964443,0.04970271,0.20444803,0.00015071359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20677653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31486106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20677653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019110471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013813444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41114593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243786276","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1504300204","title":"Meeting Australia's Labour Needs: The Case for a New Low-Skill Work Visa","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Project commissioning; Publishing; Labour economics; Gig economy; Management; Political science; Business; Engineering; Economics; Law; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.0823541066774538,"score_gpt":0.3663007818266725,"score_spread":0.2839466751492187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243786276","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023439553,0.023545416,0.0009831359,0.8633403,0.0073345737,0.00016089987,0.00011457989,0.000075971686,0.08100564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14627065,0.017721845,0.0039308276,0.71230423,0.0042642998,0.00033908317,0.00013401161,0.00011481252,0.11492034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98767465,0.0023552692,0.0007816058,0.0009817595,0.0048443596,0.0033623294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745155,0.010535621,0.001291023,0.0008994774,0.0071792346,0.005579097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017799586,0.00039511445,0.0009123733,0.001881867,0.008883157,0.0097607635,0.0027398642,0.022283532,0.0058330935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03306587,0.0008099238,0.0011493898,0.0011157953,0.005585887,0.006223132,0.0060935956,0.018364204,0.0010817065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015164698,0.0002589043,0.0051144543,0.00191148,0.00013580812,0.001651102,0.008707068,0.00048130276,0.0032200625,0.22631018,0.5980447,0.15401326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005678333,0.0001371472,0.0131180985,0.0014006222,0.00009651426,0.00027344466,0.0030531485,0.00024241663,0.00035758587,0.014743218,0.96644884,0.000072185394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18836288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3989593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18836288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00966086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.088092044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.374533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248404925","doi":"10.1177/0067205x0403200101","title":"Rights, 'Dialogue' and Democratic Objections to Judicial Review","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law; Project commissioning; Law and economics; Publishing; Judicial review; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028867238795380747,"score_gpt":0.31940084993682827,"score_spread":0.29053361114144755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248404925","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005716451,0.011833466,0.005484576,0.9016532,0.00332881,0.00007519438,0.00006222162,0.000064076,0.07178202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49208468,0.006678833,0.0068956083,0.44842243,0.020182053,0.00072836195,0.00008918492,0.00017215773,0.024746712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.709186,0.17024787,0.012465879,0.022843927,0.0697141,0.015542253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.527182,0.40487954,0.016001964,0.020576447,0.025481198,0.005878806],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22251421,0.0006572952,0.0017587811,0.004743957,0.017301489,0.02746531,0.0054496806,0.03853482,0.0039428743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37215164,0.0010328197,0.001463278,0.0038069873,0.10069883,0.020830072,0.012299848,0.0363361,0.0008777856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136850895,0.000013009157,0.00016515283,0.000050937524,0.000013328676,0.00003986873,0.003234322,0.00008035177,0.000036535745,0.9641645,0.027520256,0.0046679885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011188089,0.000030678028,0.00063521956,0.00032879997,0.00002981145,0.00012296009,0.0019111414,0.00035853064,0.00021944146,0.7359081,0.26028025,0.00006315955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018849332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018369207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22251421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020703511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02877471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9587784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256167964","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.11","title":"Lisa Burton Crawford The Rule of Law and the Australian Constitution - Janina Boughey Human Rights and Judicial Review in Australia and Canada: The Newest Despotism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05260209595554128,"score_gpt":0.3407976567241885,"score_spread":0.2881955607686472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256167964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016105351,0.05712623,0.00022037675,0.91301966,0.007267372,0.00002217546,0.000039990162,0.000011614827,0.020682076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09534253,0.081262015,0.0012875183,0.6349206,0.016185401,0.0001354873,0.000057279547,0.00012296018,0.17068614],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98672897,0.0051549594,0.0007028528,0.0019157346,0.0039975992,0.001499995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94444215,0.036561973,0.0016802606,0.0013894709,0.010027111,0.0058989557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019565534,0.000618276,0.001432757,0.0026868645,0.020838832,0.017811345,0.0021190555,0.023867402,0.010699878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06342148,0.0014801973,0.00061432034,0.0030305176,0.024130091,0.012555687,0.0044901534,0.030291926,0.0018632768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027471628,0.000044145556,0.00054432405,0.00015469326,0.000020969146,0.00011123399,0.0032872274,0.00009839046,0.00008863832,0.25548342,0.72660697,0.013532423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003233125,0.000017439603,0.002499502,0.00084795646,0.000020372867,0.000074590534,0.0028797446,0.00020934321,0.00010207634,0.057248462,0.93598026,0.00008807195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5936276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7672815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40637243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02943947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.088361286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8175313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256397086","doi":"10.1177/0067205x1304100106","title":"Considering Canadian Approaches to Equality in the Context of Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Project commissioning; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Media studies; Publishing; Ethnology; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.16254608544722277,"score_gpt":0.33825860967231586,"score_spread":0.1757125242250931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256397086","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05139401,0.0636121,0.0010190099,0.5155899,0.004479932,0.0001760384,0.0006767825,0.00005798867,0.3629943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7489168,0.035475496,0.0031560655,0.14044549,0.002015509,0.00022524234,0.0003116822,0.000104258484,0.06934951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9626386,0.006066817,0.0011298879,0.0023679198,0.010394369,0.01740243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9589502,0.014183755,0.0010594045,0.0011389046,0.019804997,0.004862727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026550287,0.0007075628,0.0016704807,0.009177238,0.047932003,0.028434109,0.0077238316,0.018553397,0.008540688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03977298,0.00089589134,0.0015049386,0.012401567,0.029123846,0.0071896,0.006450376,0.017887983,0.00038226641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054194046,0.00004512365,0.0020113739,0.00035820692,0.000062456485,0.0003854225,0.023638153,0.0004820415,0.0002340157,0.87448215,0.07683612,0.02141083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010117859,0.00005794593,0.023924056,0.0025016342,0.00038518547,0.00021541887,0.073967144,0.00067858456,0.00065329584,0.094397955,0.8027202,0.00039744895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25776795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25776795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5328707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86088395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256734129","doi":"10.22145/flr.37.3.1","title":"A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Ombudsman and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Law","score_opus":0.0750247104430044,"score_gpt":0.36557921807687466,"score_spread":0.29055450763387025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256734129","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010836656,0.012935608,0.0039720954,0.6009753,0.0035084304,0.00016043989,0.00050056435,0.000100138415,0.36701074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4713397,0.0139967585,0.0121832425,0.27726394,0.0011341891,0.00058227405,0.00034288774,0.00019255953,0.22296448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932053,0.0014356987,0.00022092999,0.0007227881,0.0024526997,0.0019626315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941168,0.0013033916,0.00021163633,0.00038398738,0.003105495,0.0008787208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048302696,0.0005220113,0.0007513715,0.0017736617,0.009055332,0.010296369,0.0035658996,0.010558511,0.009075448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015213819,0.0004090924,0.000821598,0.002239666,0.0101978285,0.009039204,0.002857573,0.011325515,0.0008384379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019701138,0.000013138841,0.00017960182,0.00007523349,0.000004979765,0.00007703949,0.0011773655,0.0002968847,0.00006079732,0.91635823,0.07338595,0.008351126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008040356,0.000037705024,0.002773886,0.0006919339,0.000028725699,0.00007904914,0.003219076,0.0020047154,0.00016967351,0.18048252,0.8103048,0.00012751785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95737314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9580024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06327785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06327785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10819935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4591151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319844237","doi":"10.1177/0067205x221146335","title":"Active After Sunset<scp>:</scp> The Politics of Judicial Retirements in India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Politics; Institution; Government (linguistics); Language change; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.039228230980859966,"score_gpt":0.3299607964961456,"score_spread":0.29073256551528565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319844237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7026497,0.0047999527,0.00048311148,0.05722167,0.0003585721,0.000016888358,0.0002000422,0.00005076676,0.23421928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875547,0.00037893024,0.000029695118,0.0017258393,0.000081155034,0.0000026520054,0.000011557926,0.0000062648237,0.01020929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981217,0.00057931663,0.000045799246,0.0001509931,0.0002712715,0.0008309184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960245,0.0017156883,0.00063822774,0.00027155736,0.00055143115,0.0007986468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020450251,0.00006062197,0.00012711162,0.0009932356,0.00785405,0.004871195,0.0005498129,0.0011170667,0.0036498813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041380455,0.00013055562,0.00017568326,0.0010426487,0.0057467474,0.000876549,0.0023505446,0.002258497,0.00039208608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016410057,0.000096413816,0.054665077,0.00018258774,0.00003163394,0.002064527,0.08320756,0.0007973808,0.0017387058,0.7113628,0.092864744,0.052824553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023669907,0.00014890055,0.272007,0.0005668115,0.00006388968,0.00091162557,0.093220145,0.00076479826,0.0029191624,0.03775941,0.5914711,0.00014346569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05682631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10841867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05682631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006069773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044535035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112991035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362669535","doi":"10.1177/0067205x231165872","title":"Commonwealth Power to Improve Access, Quality, and Efficiency of Medical Care: Does section 51 (xxiiiA) of the <i>Constitution</i> Limit Politically Feasible Health Policy Options Today?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Health Services Management and Policy","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Constitution; Law; Health care; Politics; Health policy; High Court; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10258129135789634,"score_gpt":0.5146856231739784,"score_spread":0.412104331816082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362669535","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067602254,0.018988712,0.004920559,0.5364383,0.0024879882,0.00016166574,0.00015968448,0.00006016452,0.36918065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82684857,0.008699009,0.0027819138,0.122157544,0.0023393456,0.00022509189,0.00006017246,0.000037889466,0.036850438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776654,0.010674587,0.0012356237,0.0015924568,0.005045035,0.003786811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97497624,0.017896729,0.002034986,0.001458882,0.0025513063,0.0010818819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030312898,0.00020319707,0.00060828804,0.0013154686,0.004735434,0.011905746,0.0015779674,0.011740417,0.0044568093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03279104,0.000628465,0.00070102775,0.0010033093,0.018938102,0.0043081255,0.0033510015,0.009214305,0.0007023595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011842903,0.000030164256,0.00080985104,0.00008592375,0.00001114547,0.000111481546,0.001940161,0.00035703534,0.00033371933,0.9712715,0.018060384,0.006976634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008232768,0.00023559749,0.02116771,0.003287205,0.00008137738,0.0002343929,0.0040585143,0.0028236064,0.0014393539,0.42821798,0.5381714,0.00020059913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07292451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06167994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07292451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011464683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0274932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16031182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387533621","doi":"10.1177/0067205x231205051","title":"Collective Bargaining in Fissured Work Contexts: An Analysis of Core Challenges and Novel Experiments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Collective bargaining; Legislation; Shadow (psychology); Statutory law; Competition (biology); Labour law; Economics; Labour economics; Bargaining power; Industrial relations; Business; Market economy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Management; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.10571106326510504,"score_gpt":0.35670718146644453,"score_spread":0.2509961182013395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387533621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7839325,0.00058549317,0.023101479,0.007810452,0.00026441924,0.0008344268,0.00011239297,0.000051603995,0.18330728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98587984,0.0001607647,0.0057975645,0.00039381854,0.00003510793,0.0005205482,0.00003272949,0.000024117107,0.007155415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99044806,0.0070059206,0.0001271913,0.0007335101,0.00097403984,0.0007112757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732589,0.021825971,0.0009094269,0.0019907462,0.0008256218,0.0011894013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013719603,0.0003550935,0.0006623006,0.0007608272,0.010864266,0.00577909,0.002850762,0.0028179984,0.015497761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02181989,0.00029075763,0.0005796109,0.0009225181,0.015014713,0.0050436123,0.0068950555,0.0039217523,0.00095349137],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005058508,0.0017895632,0.0058944602,0.00039674013,0.000042646156,0.0013069222,0.14004554,0.0041023167,0.0023708,0.81032926,0.005233016,0.027982851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038968536,0.0011710384,0.0136093395,0.00057148153,0.00004303696,0.0005075906,0.26486865,0.029072829,0.0020664586,0.59797597,0.089582756,0.00014110064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032867922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004188188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015497761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004370888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025514232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07255709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413961078","doi":"10.1017/fed.2025.4","title":"The Place of Federalism in Deliberative Rights Theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Law and economics; Project commissioning; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Publishing; Politics","score_opus":0.015435220683261515,"score_gpt":0.33187318277539335,"score_spread":0.3164379620921318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413961078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03599092,0.016012076,0.123912156,0.14787276,0.0009742247,0.00007722771,0.000078515804,0.000093115865,0.674989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836833,0.0017745947,0.0056066085,0.003702545,0.0005343626,0.00008791682,0.000018261813,0.000030598592,0.004561802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.970477,0.022497863,0.0005714333,0.0018952213,0.0027687433,0.0017898697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94715315,0.043891914,0.0020890671,0.0035702698,0.0024162594,0.00087936566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029593728,0.0003343516,0.00075159245,0.0031161504,0.0063730176,0.010411488,0.0018395721,0.0062825894,0.00566639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026117446,0.00046897828,0.0009931414,0.002129829,0.062955394,0.010990072,0.005444855,0.008091464,0.00049944123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013373992,0.0000022819177,0.000031855634,0.0000074217346,0.0000013563177,0.0000059835784,0.00030425788,0.00011773536,0.000006388235,0.9987243,0.00015944641,0.0006376008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005068872,0.0000050030812,0.00008969552,0.00007057114,0.0000035385083,0.0000104834035,0.0002179012,0.00041628,0.00004584962,0.98944575,0.009685749,0.000004146312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006989358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049243863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029593728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012512774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008148225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15650845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}