{"meta":{"query_hash":"b3dd22a1964a","filters":{"venue":"Federal communications law journal"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b3dd22a1964a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Federal+communications+law+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W153509639","doi":"","title":"Advertising and Childhood Obesity: The Role of the Federal Government in Limiting Children's Exposure to Unhealthy Food Advertisements","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal communications law journal","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Childhood obesity; Advertising; Government (linguistics); Obesity; Unhealthy food; Limiting; Commercial speech; Medicine; Food marketing; Environmental health; Business; Overweight; Political science; Law; Engineering; Supreme court; First amendment","score_opus":0.011183023916858156,"score_gpt":0.2805319235733746,"score_spread":0.2693488996565164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W153509639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94906783,0.0011525358,0.00003658998,0.020120313,0.0001817592,0.00044127594,0.0000045963693,0.000013021352,0.028982084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99716264,0.00022048356,0.001274449,0.0010966829,0.00017725393,0.000016887476,0.0000015616645,0.000011337726,0.000038695995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974558,0.0011741483,0.00040674355,0.00012390238,0.00055448007,0.0002849481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986326,0.00024408802,0.00027345217,0.00064241956,0.0000906218,0.000116825],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014065892,0.00010392073,0.00014287278,0.000027358665,0.004615828,0.00030186775,0.0011825865,0.000059422408,0.000010910156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039618943,0.000075524345,0.0000598007,0.00023900186,0.00025842132,0.0003045373,0.00045327417,0.00052756787,0.000002152202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012816058,0.00052964914,0.70891905,0.000005406304,0.00005523459,7.5907444e-8,0.07851773,0.00012556139,0.00009152666,0.16720124,0.00010454564,0.04443717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004558561,0.0001668608,0.9503088,0.00020922806,0.000017777742,0.000013516841,0.017146898,0.000066759196,0.00016114244,0.012558227,0.018743373,0.00015155683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003560663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035453886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24138975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003254385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114630886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159867657","doi":"","title":"Did AT&T Die in Vain? An Empirical Comparison of AT&T and Bell Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal communications law journal","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Divestment; Monopoly; Leapfrogging; Legislature; Economics; Telecommunications; Business; Market economy; Finance; Law; Engineering; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.060291291191484894,"score_gpt":0.3228621717562015,"score_spread":0.2625708805647166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159867657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98518765,0.0029992645,0.000015012043,0.00065035967,0.000055157572,0.000044240314,0.000014778952,0.000018514886,0.01101505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985125,0.00080771337,0.00038007318,0.00015007505,0.000029606912,0.0000020764435,0.000016615011,0.000013828477,0.000087519475],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923325,0.00009110625,0.00032487218,0.00003018387,0.0001260786,0.00019451822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927354,0.00010811207,0.000056944245,0.0003905952,0.000035763896,0.00013502427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000961153,0.00009668018,0.00020543726,0.00004773195,0.00082735904,0.00002255657,0.00032266762,0.000046099125,0.000027998602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011196439,0.00009337312,0.000026520414,0.00007315959,0.00012876456,0.00012318893,0.0001450462,0.00033784332,0.0000017786191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051176055,0.0002652783,0.9294149,0.000038799226,0.00009819683,0.000014525692,0.029616678,0.007476341,0.0015822118,0.0015544281,0.028635107,0.0012523233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013716014,0.00020462325,0.70327765,0.0000842495,0.000026970652,0.0009060239,0.002423432,0.025232663,0.002629336,0.0003143537,0.26298168,0.0005473989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11084124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90315586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7923146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000263794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005925064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89507973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772447100","doi":"","title":"A New Method to Address Cyberbullying in the United States: The Application of a Notice-and-Takedown Model as a Restriction on Cyberbullying Speech","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal communications law journal","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Notice; Legislature; Political science; Law; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Argument (complex analysis); Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Linguistics; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.05313333046070591,"score_gpt":0.35365477881683943,"score_spread":0.30052144835613354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772447100","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034909483,0.00010041082,0.9232684,0.03153823,0.00010067471,0.000753098,0.0000038383178,0.000059546674,0.0092663495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7951416,0.00025944796,0.20293537,0.0014253007,0.0000629792,0.00006716587,0.0000070188667,0.000015196706,0.000085966356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976856,0.00071942405,0.0005239954,0.00027218927,0.0004925418,0.0003062248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956835,0.00056573446,0.0005547751,0.0028140463,0.0002382649,0.00014371006],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024029338,0.00018826805,0.00020926393,0.00025558757,0.0043355706,0.0014809768,0.0040297713,0.00009321139,0.0000024975543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024691262,0.00012866964,0.000089639565,0.0005542288,0.00010597747,0.00056834926,0.00059280073,0.0009439041,0.000016196604],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014903306,0.0002666357,0.0002051199,0.000016341153,0.00008364105,0.000014583148,0.011546353,0.0647528,0.0017938494,0.7110877,0.0008638926,0.20922002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012520417,0.00040352903,0.0026146492,0.0003093681,0.00005380072,0.0007485879,0.0019680245,0.8851236,0.001220269,0.07613055,0.029743131,0.0004324674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013321567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003543375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8203708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010397197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012202119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788389085","doi":"","title":"Protecting Privacy and Enabling Pharmaceutical Sales on the Internet: A Comparative Analysis of the United States and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal communications law journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Health care; Business; Internet privacy; Payment; Public health; Health policy; Protected health information; Marketing; Public relations; HRHIS; Medicine; Economic growth; Nursing; Political science; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.4939704208475641,"score_gpt":0.5307094751433687,"score_spread":0.03673905429580465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788389085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95673203,0.0010314127,0.000027349792,0.039959874,0.000092156166,0.0003289684,0.00003782445,0.000012071337,0.0017782854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908409,0.0018217335,0.000056996836,0.0071134763,0.000045885976,0.00002031483,0.000018379493,0.000006587024,0.000075710464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964897,0.0024835672,0.00042947917,0.00013481165,0.00017261737,0.00028982683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655,0.002413313,0.00024999728,0.00034698687,0.00019857493,0.00024111621],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012002168,0.00015512502,0.00025869295,0.00009525266,0.0027819327,0.000090735484,0.0006696523,0.00012108329,0.0001690331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017196931,0.00009503276,0.000068514804,0.00055458833,0.000720977,0.00008303689,0.0003649184,0.0033939383,9.613493e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029386359,0.0018807629,0.5770934,0.00022685139,0.015029771,0.00007957663,0.040029492,0.013145107,0.006361146,0.31634045,0.009088489,0.01778628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001829734,0.00017299628,0.027598869,0.00019198345,0.0016588764,0.00036779072,0.0114637185,0.22105087,0.0068130186,0.0018168837,0.7266108,0.00042450323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058595836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2358706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71752226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010989904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013151312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799992432","doi":"","title":"The Role of Efficiencies in Telecommunications Merger Review","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal communications law journal","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Telecommunications; Business; Telecom infrastructure sharing; Telecommunications service; Consolidation (business); Economies of scope; Economies of scale; Global network; Multinational corporation; Industrial organization; Broadband; Deregulation; Marketing; Economics; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.018338243324995285,"score_gpt":0.2755556837893609,"score_spread":0.2572174404643656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799992432","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044136945,0.54163134,0.00008496246,0.003430792,0.00015487555,0.00029063172,0.0000080138425,0.00007492431,0.4101875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034245,0.095527574,0.0008290277,0.00012559892,0.000008145566,0.000014890557,0.0000024078263,0.000011399883,0.00005646665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900055,0.00026343518,0.0004128208,0.000019137256,0.00010638633,0.00019767035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984669,0.0003293011,0.00007787277,0.0009936858,0.00008645135,0.000045791247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006532262,0.000085459316,0.00014925051,0.000046827972,0.0011933272,0.0000933013,0.00094600575,0.000030388672,0.00003220122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012640105,0.000062585415,0.000075124924,0.00028347925,0.00022539186,0.00012384559,0.00006246509,0.00043926176,0.000012081475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038797502,0.00019715028,0.00220075,0.00010153678,0.000118754535,2.6192555e-7,0.0055900733,0.003099962,0.0048805755,0.9671579,0.0061702854,0.01047887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014631005,0.000018455135,0.00121887,0.000392875,0.000018096407,0.000084303494,0.0021949864,0.0007876536,0.0015786196,0.0038253148,0.9895884,0.00014611942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010894919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013160101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9834181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000510435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004303208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9178229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}