{"meta":{"query_hash":"dbbe8506a579","filters":{"venue":"Feminist Legal Studies"},"cohort_total":29,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":29,"exported":29,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dbbe8506a579","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Feminist+Legal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1591788322","doi":"10.1023/a:1009205626028","title":"Barriers to Gender Equality in the Canadian Legal Establishment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Queen's University","funders":"Canadian Bar Association","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science; Privilege (computing); Legislature; Government (linguistics); Practice of law; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.10928262914200731,"score_gpt":0.4240002035658897,"score_spread":0.3147175744238824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591788322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7029186,0.003003717,0.0009203926,0.08868287,0.00023339424,0.00017168593,0.00023783722,0.000027374585,0.20380421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829699,0.0008044297,0.00024470748,0.0030523217,0.000027493668,0.000035408208,0.000027207094,0.000015197426,0.012823246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97347766,0.0033205699,0.00042442814,0.001173385,0.0068697813,0.014734166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95312124,0.017211776,0.0027584166,0.00093263667,0.010749556,0.015226352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012491069,0.00028999022,0.0008136964,0.0042750756,0.06064153,0.016170038,0.0045929174,0.004690975,0.019068489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042688336,0.00072008173,0.00064114196,0.006056035,0.024264947,0.00454903,0.009906768,0.009725693,0.00047273366],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015277792,0.0003369981,0.05946136,0.0002926816,0.000041469208,0.0012771796,0.25470492,0.001076393,0.0007370958,0.5856145,0.030857755,0.0654469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064750115,0.00008748851,0.20557082,0.0012453808,0.00007729277,0.00028096532,0.5590952,0.0013871634,0.000554746,0.031842962,0.1996021,0.00019112875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99779344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2332248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2332248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38092723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88935053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591811971","doi":"10.1007/s10691-006-9017-y","title":"A pregnant pause: federalism, equality and the maternity and parental leave debate in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionality; Federalism; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03063211017214136,"score_gpt":0.3148618371547263,"score_spread":0.284229726982585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591811971","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3018308,0.016206956,0.0009463466,0.5136474,0.0009634594,0.00007184586,0.00051725836,0.0000366782,0.1657793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9075741,0.0042776293,0.00051278394,0.04841917,0.0002743031,0.000041735482,0.000081476916,0.000049648257,0.038769178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877229,0.0024163693,0.00022827719,0.0008025669,0.0026333935,0.0061964416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802555,0.010006946,0.0008127916,0.0004257052,0.0037025881,0.0047963737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010885409,0.00031486875,0.0010650757,0.0016926411,0.04711481,0.013734432,0.004161513,0.013159418,0.011157321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029825,0.00075712154,0.00064847176,0.0038502556,0.017338919,0.0042427476,0.005865133,0.015175873,0.00028914792],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019191309,0.00013151168,0.01335806,0.00012929646,0.0000463737,0.0004963313,0.04440942,0.0010357908,0.00031593116,0.85745656,0.05846116,0.023967603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034880702,0.00013314062,0.09127973,0.0016020505,0.0002858006,0.00025499924,0.18193653,0.0032242688,0.0013119348,0.120986335,0.5980803,0.00055609696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99842936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22932331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22932331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.395553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8938757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W15971032","doi":"10.1007/s10691-013-9245-x","title":"Jeffory A. Clymer: Family Money: Property, Race, and Literature in the Nineteenth Century","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Literature: history, themes, analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Property (philosophy); Political philosophy; Public international law; International political economy; Law and economics; Property rights; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; International law; Politics; Epistemology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02163359649269191,"score_gpt":0.2277514712527142,"score_spread":0.20611787476002227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W15971032","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012706246,0.18725489,0.0014613514,0.66344607,0.005546545,0.000023253544,0.00020200998,0.000040938317,0.12931861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37198836,0.19739135,0.0028864194,0.12713373,0.0068925424,0.00011406672,0.000115478026,0.000197051,0.293281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902666,0.00044137836,0.000041192237,0.00011443129,0.00027435672,0.00010191396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934344,0.0047864765,0.0002662602,0.00011832072,0.0009496259,0.0004449152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002204405,0.00035669818,0.0004311744,0.0021394396,0.010590126,0.004837853,0.0012152593,0.0041993796,0.009875947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076669483,0.000284426,0.000203709,0.0025714259,0.0075780265,0.010753621,0.0019484913,0.0047080102,0.0010637393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000423155,0.000028596243,0.0008626429,0.00020274689,0.0000062765926,0.0003835718,0.03342854,0.000061663595,0.00014353044,0.4207385,0.5206937,0.023407819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014240995,0.000014838999,0.0038624897,0.001294304,0.00000913615,0.00031248195,0.043044586,0.00012094981,0.0005193305,0.059141286,0.8916334,0.000032959328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059688102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1462724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059688102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034697456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045476872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11868131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608658107","doi":"10.1007/s10691-008-9097-y","title":"Dorothy E. Chunn, Susan B. Boyd, Hester Lessard (eds): Reaction and resistance: Feminism, law and social change","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Political philosophy; Public international law; Law; Political science; Gender studies; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.16369510447259625,"score_gpt":0.3681918065269923,"score_spread":0.20449670205439605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608658107","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027196747,0.77685976,0.0022732217,0.11255159,0.008244834,0.000047818958,0.00014530627,0.000120700024,0.09703713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020064568,0.86697096,0.0022900235,0.00536636,0.0035944914,0.000046581765,0.000108580105,0.000055544206,0.10150286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993241,0.0002788229,0.000032586373,0.00008909233,0.00022989458,0.000045467477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979978,0.0011589286,0.00015393179,0.000053758664,0.00027310746,0.00036233934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018203884,0.0010030321,0.0007276415,0.0019140883,0.002652777,0.005590018,0.0011089081,0.0033817254,0.031274095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022071272,0.0006526485,0.000318728,0.0027225371,0.0025640605,0.008401712,0.0017126348,0.0028253144,0.009258674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051578143,0.0000534561,0.0011456406,0.0009904822,0.000016309115,0.00016369723,0.004658118,0.00022079567,0.0002947031,0.023238158,0.7055171,0.26365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015342717,0.000034109624,0.0040897233,0.0017963636,0.00003226258,0.00070013036,0.0146922935,0.00021529161,0.00030416567,0.016079437,0.9620059,0.000034926037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0117874425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04231512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031274095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015711242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028197342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104622304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W187902244","doi":"10.1007/s10691-012-9229-2","title":"Anne McNevin: Contesting Citizenship: Irregular Migrants and New Frontiers of the Political","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Public international law; Political philosophy; Politics; Political science; Gender studies; International political economy; Sociology; Human rights; Political economy; Law; International law","score_opus":0.04373565114786548,"score_gpt":0.309835909776305,"score_spread":0.2661002586284395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W187902244","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006303601,0.019112749,0.0003379944,0.9447336,0.0066013373,0.000033579337,0.00007404465,0.000015560037,0.022787564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1630244,0.03195978,0.0019415973,0.58032465,0.0072922516,0.00038956967,0.00007803342,0.00020639299,0.21478337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705684,0.0016295295,0.00011668318,0.0002512279,0.0006243317,0.00032129014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832387,0.013387381,0.0005333484,0.0002277194,0.0012663035,0.0013465172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058875675,0.00060859544,0.0007864509,0.001076713,0.014165413,0.007963874,0.0030588938,0.014981371,0.00949457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018312134,0.0005691851,0.00034471712,0.0015868994,0.010647426,0.013683768,0.004576292,0.017104972,0.0012103071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036659952,0.000049184702,0.00071632385,0.00021784,0.000009069191,0.00037533225,0.042350642,0.00014448125,0.00018620622,0.16587797,0.77725875,0.012777474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024692785,0.000022943774,0.002259887,0.0010772187,0.000008702141,0.00033640367,0.12170901,0.00019450572,0.00045933525,0.051924158,0.8218913,0.00009190394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06779445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15858953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06779445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035371147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008691079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13479966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969922824","doi":"10.1007/s10691-012-9198-5","title":"Comparing Women in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Situated; State (computer science); Root (linguistics); Feminism; Gender equality; Gender studies; Power (physics); Action (physics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07023185232347437,"score_gpt":0.3311269559579014,"score_spread":0.26089510363442703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969922824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662484,0.0031911319,0.000112708556,0.005312506,0.00011108283,0.00007052429,0.0017812434,0.000013199384,0.023159303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98481816,0.0018064056,0.00015315077,0.0011027466,0.000019835226,0.00003549878,0.0006086952,0.000017319164,0.011438206],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995152,0.00047024302,0.00012257385,0.00040400316,0.0011343253,0.0027168032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99459606,0.00045398268,0.0004444817,0.00008761688,0.0022733244,0.0021445064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001594423,0.000353271,0.00087605143,0.0044887466,0.018715605,0.004907326,0.0019757666,0.0016620331,0.008507054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005767668,0.00041670655,0.00068338803,0.012813166,0.0027823786,0.0011687046,0.0030706967,0.0019909476,0.000571292],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009737094,0.00034527117,0.7979702,0.00024635857,0.00020343401,0.0016964213,0.08159315,0.0006267984,0.00063182594,0.021415735,0.025981277,0.06831588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005134888,0.00011262564,0.7734575,0.00027468795,0.00007832959,0.00025790025,0.18573293,0.0003145024,0.00026351752,0.0009173982,0.038450647,0.00008863471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99775225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99920183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11650076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11650076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12906128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8452761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018206738","doi":"10.1007/s10691-006-9028-8","title":"Losing the Feminist Voice? Debates on The Legal Recognition of Same Sex Partnerships in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Economic Justice; Political science; Narrative; Legislature; Gender studies; Law; House of Commons; Disadvantaged; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10104251470509097,"score_gpt":0.3455529708465397,"score_spread":0.24451045614144873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018206738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09852087,0.011419894,0.0006142288,0.7505828,0.0012003604,0.0000589781,0.00018247015,0.000025627876,0.13739486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8286043,0.005879189,0.00047756417,0.13436285,0.000483685,0.00007038377,0.00006897235,0.00006647895,0.029986618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97214377,0.005148096,0.00053608307,0.0017108577,0.006219251,0.014241908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9552739,0.01982315,0.0016759813,0.0008279936,0.010025668,0.012373296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023304125,0.00044443886,0.0015844111,0.0034640455,0.06848424,0.028747305,0.008583708,0.024368761,0.013863479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04727008,0.0010057727,0.00085772417,0.0056555974,0.04387268,0.009711365,0.010317217,0.028919695,0.0004900432],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008048445,0.00010451463,0.004848007,0.00016906239,0.000042520827,0.00047542455,0.070415944,0.00046993405,0.00028124137,0.82747465,0.07314508,0.022493016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015916428,0.00007557877,0.025618738,0.0016944017,0.00015699687,0.00028856602,0.3175097,0.0014120372,0.00092858524,0.10002825,0.55170417,0.00042388754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99645114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23067549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23067549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46449628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8923074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025518801","doi":"10.1007/s10691-010-9152-3","title":"Autonomy for Mothers? Relational Theory and Parenting Apart","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Normative; Nature versus nurture; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Feminism; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05135832612690287,"score_gpt":0.355402017298026,"score_spread":0.3040436911711231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025518801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24453658,0.008097909,0.012073592,0.18480535,0.0005942531,0.000038531973,0.00010082527,0.0000277542,0.5497252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98976225,0.0010222694,0.00062097865,0.0017186493,0.000104515086,0.000024783181,0.00001269515,0.000010100927,0.006723719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971277,0.0019462049,0.000055129767,0.00022886334,0.0002530384,0.0003890098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990947,0.0064813653,0.00075029465,0.0006858582,0.0003163617,0.00081917556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055157337,0.00021606516,0.00031606937,0.000536098,0.0043721707,0.0048185275,0.0011540888,0.0029779605,0.008076453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013678088,0.00027230722,0.00023192466,0.0005920821,0.02225914,0.0058584693,0.0044529918,0.003485204,0.0003242157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015224071,0.000027280279,0.0012672336,0.000015693351,0.0000030658166,0.00018232588,0.03075658,0.000059518257,0.00006172138,0.960224,0.001170902,0.0062164613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038350205,0.000031594034,0.0033635432,0.00023386368,0.000013611721,0.00045108254,0.062964246,0.00026538997,0.00023419535,0.88013774,0.052253198,0.00001317832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041598454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052068136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008076453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025792108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032709173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029170394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033033098","doi":"10.1007/s10691-015-9279-3","title":"Sex Work’s Governance: Stuff and Nuisance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Corporate governance; Work (physics); Political science; Business; Law; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.054978676246540924,"score_gpt":0.34971638885360495,"score_spread":0.29473771260706405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033033098","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09824706,0.027323736,0.01171606,0.44782922,0.0017837588,0.00007994816,0.00014710943,0.000040392875,0.41283265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729859,0.0035633098,0.0009594616,0.0114586335,0.0010499441,0.00009699266,0.000026514444,0.00004812946,0.00981101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98738575,0.008786165,0.0002733452,0.00082887115,0.0013286148,0.001397281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746708,0.018455317,0.0010479697,0.002658099,0.0014700654,0.0016977545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020303462,0.00035880948,0.0009000063,0.0031925754,0.014083543,0.020594392,0.002081978,0.007144896,0.008463671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024150012,0.0005527921,0.0003616116,0.002972683,0.12561034,0.019732751,0.010743719,0.006827666,0.000409768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007936571,0.000017628952,0.0008593399,0.000032493077,0.000004705883,0.000041876727,0.027128179,0.000054231492,0.000046856658,0.9616143,0.0032804443,0.0069119874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018705337,0.000021775353,0.002676202,0.0005689592,0.00001024872,0.00013050144,0.08577648,0.00020522947,0.0001418329,0.8119513,0.098473646,0.000025175872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015915621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02521069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020594392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006652447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010416519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10737622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087264935","doi":"10.1023/b:fest.0000004706.13979.73","title":"Vrinda Narain, Gender and Community: Muslim Women's Rights in India, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political philosophy; Gender studies; Public international law; Political science; Sociology; Gender equality; Politics; Law; International law","score_opus":0.035966673482520826,"score_gpt":0.29816998008482226,"score_spread":0.26220330660230146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087264935","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009148242,0.81294847,0.0006784426,0.104743,0.0019817746,0.00003208627,0.0009946662,0.000057317367,0.06941597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20151152,0.6883038,0.0015897978,0.0125793945,0.0027475138,0.00012593661,0.0005643788,0.00009349607,0.092484176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935836,0.00023341624,0.000045916247,0.00004665183,0.00016454616,0.00015124913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978423,0.0014069809,0.00015857878,0.000059057977,0.00033516524,0.00019791238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011756255,0.0008703516,0.00057077873,0.0022227534,0.007597657,0.0063675274,0.0018216816,0.0054809144,0.011613793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023572394,0.00085535814,0.0002530275,0.007523836,0.004906197,0.005684392,0.0013524089,0.0045802123,0.0019416626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007302826,0.000058612408,0.002464133,0.0013252022,0.000025745117,0.00088668446,0.0722653,0.00038915125,0.0004753597,0.22926043,0.64036506,0.052411314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030196452,0.000028300903,0.024166716,0.0017568076,0.00004731981,0.0004446669,0.05082924,0.00016876332,0.00039317348,0.02315035,0.8989294,0.000055084707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42985576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80820227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42985576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010307239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014717968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8547075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095307881","doi":"10.1007/s10691-014-9263-3","title":"Sexual Assault and the Meaning of Power and Authority for Women with Mental Disabilities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Doctrine; Criminology; Psychology; Sexual violence; Power (physics); Meaning (existential); Economic Justice; Public international law; Criminal law; Law; Social psychology; International law; Political science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.031581546580396004,"score_gpt":0.32370811175730513,"score_spread":0.2921265651769091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095307881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73512197,0.0059952224,0.00038903524,0.05367328,0.0002943175,0.000023106895,0.000052022064,0.0000053769813,0.20444562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996527,0.0009118484,0.000028222998,0.0006947073,0.000036168098,0.0000074510913,0.000004184597,0.0000022633576,0.0017881026],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961009,0.0024538895,0.00009207928,0.00012247353,0.0003054907,0.00092517596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942542,0.00391589,0.00071866874,0.00017616389,0.00029516898,0.00063997984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034342357,0.00027061923,0.00033790193,0.0021068167,0.015062352,0.009006501,0.0011657637,0.0028047026,0.005131912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118755875,0.0002595118,0.0002633769,0.0014071488,0.047533464,0.006560168,0.006947775,0.0049163997,0.00017685741],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004491276,0.000087692046,0.006723782,0.0000634982,0.000007207908,0.0009198949,0.7193561,0.0000582705,0.00016377299,0.26114705,0.0015009705,0.0099268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000096973135,0.00002582234,0.0058372603,0.00023136259,0.000007936122,0.00048356832,0.94553715,0.000040951843,0.00010850533,0.030980688,0.016723363,0.000013731181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036952242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050462577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036952242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067219194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064649386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07347435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283669943","doi":"10.1007/s10691-016-9309-9","title":"Recognition of Gendered Experiences of Harm at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: The Promise and the Pitfalls","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Society of Legal Scholars","keywords":"Harm; Scrutiny; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Public international law; Human rights; Population; Gender studies; Political science; International law","score_opus":0.06929769269406194,"score_gpt":0.32827403567670205,"score_spread":0.2589763429826401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283669943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93383855,0.0020043228,0.0006764006,0.016415019,0.00018380312,0.00002139126,0.000034979887,0.000005688709,0.046819918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962351,0.0004061633,0.000067781606,0.0007822551,0.000036406247,0.00000954873,0.0000069717507,0.00000379836,0.0024520291],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962966,0.0025502963,0.00006499218,0.00017314893,0.00030498707,0.0006099884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703777,0.0018681054,0.0005215989,0.00014504639,0.00014341027,0.0002841466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032831607,0.00047032288,0.00044974568,0.0012775541,0.018243155,0.008609156,0.0010192168,0.0037778458,0.003816212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064888904,0.00042027223,0.0001702348,0.00091047626,0.036480732,0.00574715,0.010578047,0.0056355186,0.00022293993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014842072,0.000005699543,0.0017603879,0.000025076652,0.0000025333354,0.0008725159,0.9788113,0.000015090143,0.00034567353,0.015404282,0.00049875036,0.0022438322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014022307,0.000017562465,0.0031648485,0.000099084995,0.0000022275929,0.00053017057,0.9835031,0.000022769538,0.00018906906,0.0024239009,0.010035759,0.000010009033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020363878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03970981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020363878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061389995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024793986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044541717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2435814675","doi":"10.1007/s10691-016-9321-0","title":"Sarah Keenan: Subversive Property: Law and the Production of Spaces of Belonging","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Public international law; Property (philosophy); Political philosophy; Production (economics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; International law; Politics; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.0227574983672201,"score_gpt":0.28407745482752195,"score_spread":0.26131995646030187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2435814675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010141659,0.03886497,0.0020029158,0.88599306,0.0029840858,0.000030799678,0.00012789921,0.000023768796,0.059830878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47599602,0.048523318,0.005620452,0.25376943,0.005782463,0.00031096354,0.00011100385,0.00018155546,0.20970483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783736,0.0013112709,0.000071980234,0.00028266618,0.00032261547,0.00017416685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99138826,0.0069540557,0.00027446006,0.00027343593,0.000693395,0.00041649846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003913331,0.0007061003,0.00059025316,0.0010968967,0.007904546,0.008545086,0.0023428036,0.016502447,0.009653914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008526463,0.0005587749,0.00037096278,0.0011502742,0.021287411,0.027375702,0.003673551,0.015847376,0.0015323836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044783697,0.000035904362,0.00036512388,0.00017167657,0.000008194661,0.00020093261,0.052260585,0.00009917776,0.00022096644,0.7493511,0.18636917,0.010872383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029805435,0.000022309536,0.0013332919,0.0008567073,0.000012426887,0.0002942067,0.061324876,0.0002418605,0.00083664665,0.3691654,0.5658183,0.000064159394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02021825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054966696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02021825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031995422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041338815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040201128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760873196","doi":"10.1007/s10691-017-9356-x","title":"Racialized Women, the Law and the Violence of White Settler Colonialism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Conceptualization; Criminology; White (mutation); Public international law; Colonialism; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; International law; Poison control; Political science; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.03621312429659344,"score_gpt":0.3106083753975901,"score_spread":0.27439525110099666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760873196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7715698,0.0037419389,0.0003794866,0.037429255,0.00020095268,0.00001552874,0.000035877725,0.0000035121047,0.1866236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99116737,0.0005987967,0.000057198613,0.0018103706,0.00006563628,0.0000090467865,0.000004487278,0.0000039276115,0.0062831775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779886,0.0010800414,0.00003180451,0.00019225443,0.00022188555,0.00067526964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997416,0.0015030764,0.0004423991,0.000114784016,0.0001751436,0.0003485336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027045542,0.00018093076,0.00023774088,0.0009219609,0.013654863,0.005761874,0.00061844836,0.0020437886,0.0057217497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006794185,0.00016475897,0.00011547297,0.0012317465,0.022741755,0.0023736989,0.0030676823,0.0028874371,0.0001433841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004821007,0.000094332245,0.019084254,0.000052491283,0.000022227905,0.00056756695,0.32859007,0.00007844455,0.0003952696,0.6270307,0.0062794406,0.017757023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003188768,0.00007239578,0.06968,0.00059941586,0.00006271143,0.00043446125,0.62681365,0.00020179251,0.00064835185,0.12013506,0.18128295,0.00003733922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09734845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1865765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09734845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036787502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050514787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19356364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763310201","doi":"10.1007/s10691-017-9355-y","title":"Wench Tactics? Openings in Conditions of Closure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Closure (psychology); Sociology; Publishing; Law; Economic Justice; Public relations; Political science; Media studies; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06415313747011338,"score_gpt":0.41568183122572055,"score_spread":0.3515286937556072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763310201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060538597,0.015624631,0.019166062,0.2975997,0.019346133,0.00014109882,0.00014033739,0.00079367374,0.5866498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8483478,0.004551463,0.0043956204,0.025393032,0.0058421353,0.00023240526,0.00007971062,0.0009774506,0.11018036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98109806,0.010414347,0.00087095494,0.0017804092,0.0036667138,0.0021694894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689831,0.02022423,0.0029748494,0.003339349,0.0024181178,0.0020602525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014875146,0.0006695802,0.00078607706,0.0028469234,0.018528914,0.02684774,0.002178558,0.0062150513,0.014722035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058760725,0.0005592145,0.00077129214,0.0025653779,0.05432904,0.030923696,0.01254358,0.0082038175,0.0025466587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003424616,0.000011564669,0.00047272665,0.00012113251,0.0000070315723,0.0007794491,0.15614344,0.000040422558,0.0001460695,0.78943783,0.040411867,0.012394302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000152631,0.000021414553,0.00046536647,0.0007503736,0.000012250814,0.00052832346,0.11623998,0.00012074309,0.00041743458,0.12898564,0.752397,0.00004624106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026750115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003977339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02684774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006466341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042643086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07866824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771757530","doi":"10.1007/s10691-018-9364-5","title":"Judging in Marriage’s Shadow","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cohabitation; Shadow (psychology); Openness to experience; Operationalization; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Law; Property (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Political science; Social psychology; Gender studies; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.062378099473101266,"score_gpt":0.37685382608982915,"score_spread":0.3144757266167279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771757530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33225238,0.00066065113,0.0033159202,0.01820295,0.00033240364,0.00003505409,0.00007058439,0.00001870757,0.6451113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99426115,0.0000610263,0.0003437747,0.00039763952,0.000035024677,0.0000050526596,0.000011353468,0.00001128703,0.0048735775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939138,0.003053566,0.00017203252,0.00080714567,0.001055557,0.0009978404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863767,0.006813317,0.0011083949,0.0016117918,0.0025382712,0.0015515351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063931686,0.0001808616,0.00043423023,0.0018627997,0.010802071,0.0065373946,0.0011699894,0.0019096131,0.017534398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0287626,0.00025013788,0.00023779324,0.0018306326,0.020367678,0.007378772,0.0043556523,0.0034336024,0.00067214714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073421026,0.00004660373,0.00837784,0.00003689722,0.0000075901166,0.0002486489,0.0732118,0.00009665676,0.00029748707,0.88500375,0.0060666706,0.026532618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032243574,0.00007129263,0.024062594,0.00016475325,0.000017724235,0.0002527982,0.20445482,0.0008591593,0.0014780827,0.66308725,0.10548274,0.000036541493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01847067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033315055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01847067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045621535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004264333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05865842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970890586","doi":"10.1007/s10691-019-09410-5","title":"The Politics of “Doing Exactly Nothing”: Feminist Legal Change and Bureaucratic Administration of Refugee Protection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Refugee; Expansive; Political science; Politics; Law; Jurisprudence; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.04848994143138324,"score_gpt":0.33186345939377,"score_spread":0.28337351796238675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970890586","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08044594,0.0054461826,0.0046395375,0.5795901,0.0011877775,0.000051687934,0.000035168025,0.00003344475,0.32857022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96523,0.0007964946,0.00060620095,0.01962248,0.00045800558,0.00007476964,0.0000069535854,0.000046646404,0.013158579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9574695,0.033557594,0.0005191623,0.0015078889,0.002153192,0.0047925888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639684,0.027972758,0.0023057584,0.0016500959,0.0018552635,0.0022477757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039148886,0.00046266025,0.00064382766,0.001970283,0.039864466,0.024619224,0.002689122,0.014501746,0.0069243964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039092027,0.0007106304,0.00051362714,0.0022844556,0.15246384,0.017012034,0.009725559,0.023065152,0.0004690013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070430947,0.000021903123,0.00020192664,0.000012989267,0.0000020261837,0.000046269342,0.034612045,0.000058242065,0.00003316141,0.95949525,0.0036965415,0.0018126043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052186493,0.000041561565,0.0021896951,0.00050241395,0.00001781613,0.00014082763,0.21530433,0.00048622128,0.00040979797,0.61235464,0.16842823,0.00007242213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047378264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05962738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047378264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021958528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03340538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20704156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044489824","doi":"10.1007/s10691-020-09431-5","title":"Sex, Sexism, and Judicial Misconduct: How the Canadian Judicial Council Perpetuates Sexism in the Legal Realm","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual misconduct; Political science; Law; Realm; Misconduct; Ideal (ethics); Judicial discretion; Criminology; Psychology; Judicial review","score_opus":0.11739559709326783,"score_gpt":0.3084875568402541,"score_spread":0.19109195974698626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044489824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47563797,0.0046833884,0.0011700139,0.06990129,0.0003165011,0.00004324661,0.00012997321,0.000020996285,0.44809666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986173,0.0008427878,0.00020771287,0.0021547114,0.000029107208,0.000009842423,0.000011534592,0.000015310448,0.010556053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934644,0.0016326875,0.00009629738,0.00054562214,0.0022847194,0.0019762672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881841,0.005352628,0.00089815416,0.0004643851,0.0034759187,0.0016248121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007905889,0.00026572513,0.00042908412,0.0027060246,0.03208594,0.013970286,0.002803552,0.004047895,0.008778267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01777378,0.00040599407,0.00034378195,0.0031480044,0.058218256,0.0041750097,0.005638229,0.0052945493,0.00023852692],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054725897,0.0000692451,0.021739187,0.000053200627,0.00002192252,0.00037135454,0.2282697,0.0002969029,0.00051143416,0.7097569,0.010187285,0.028668126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005418467,0.000052055544,0.08047116,0.0006266042,0.000120041295,0.0002470688,0.44256485,0.00078094564,0.00079687836,0.16801362,0.30608365,0.00018895867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97705066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89349097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10650903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20352408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7727807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124653487","doi":"10.1007/s10691-012-9206-9","title":"Two Mothers in Law and Fact","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Lesbian; Kinship; Jurisdiction; Family law; Queer; Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0632047386437186,"score_gpt":0.3847897248492908,"score_spread":0.3215849862055722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124653487","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15221675,0.0054846415,0.0045366604,0.547925,0.002133751,0.00008861425,0.00008609454,0.00003210118,0.2874965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.874561,0.0018674848,0.0013489341,0.033942282,0.0005891096,0.00012842493,0.000020212912,0.000056980876,0.08748554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442637,0.0037772285,0.00009551636,0.00050796155,0.00044089873,0.00075205206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775009,0.01916388,0.00080850266,0.0007116626,0.00066691113,0.0011482266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01154129,0.00031849442,0.00054867717,0.0011959011,0.02307719,0.009394364,0.0016015177,0.0106616905,0.012885381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022512516,0.0005765906,0.0002800363,0.00088073465,0.04161093,0.013689246,0.007419838,0.01437822,0.00069449836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013167491,0.000027019098,0.00036075074,0.000012962062,0.0000011901142,0.000444731,0.076047264,0.000012860136,0.000070716385,0.9132054,0.0065882686,0.0032156522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005045385,0.000057663587,0.0012976851,0.000402722,0.000017276108,0.0010657479,0.23281698,0.00023168742,0.0007637767,0.30900756,0.45425257,0.000035883095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012437102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019402815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02307719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064975065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00704315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061036944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W33917814","doi":"10.1007/s10691-011-9190-5","title":"Roundtable on Eve Darian-Smith, Religion, Race, Rights: Landmarks in the History of Modern Anglo-American Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Political philosophy; Public international law; Law; Human rights; Political science; Philosophy; International law; Sociology; Politics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.055792596148593276,"score_gpt":0.3113767344751245,"score_spread":0.2555841383265312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W33917814","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010475696,0.014248691,0.00031310684,0.86408687,0.09979668,0.00003901078,0.00028267,0.00006538188,0.020119974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017104037,0.0068150507,0.00050654577,0.673772,0.065469444,0.00015473367,0.00015651209,0.00016704011,0.23585467],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985183,0.00046590905,0.000051141044,0.0002282285,0.00047718204,0.00025920864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462765,0.002935261,0.00023279613,0.00022050261,0.00094972434,0.0010340522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002319548,0.0007953816,0.0010412124,0.0007585392,0.0083927065,0.0054844785,0.002118761,0.011889781,0.029350637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008920636,0.000503908,0.0006503682,0.00085172994,0.003784988,0.0066242763,0.0065767085,0.024619818,0.009174095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015786303,0.000008351355,0.000039883795,0.000015820122,0.0000016895456,0.000029370573,0.00023713522,0.000009517058,0.00003270087,0.0037861231,0.9936971,0.0021264644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001665946,0.000011002308,0.00054093066,0.00017377561,0.000004009244,0.00002858453,0.0022098012,0.00002867206,0.00007210898,0.003800511,0.9930934,0.000020576277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01712066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0671725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029350637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025962144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034126395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098187685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321435057","doi":"10.1007/s10691-023-09520-1","title":"Towards a Feminist Geo-legal Ethic of Caring Within Medical Supply Chains: Lessons from Careless Supply During the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Principle of legality; Health care; Pandemic; Business; Philosophy of medicine; Law; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Medicine","score_opus":0.07825689830413116,"score_gpt":0.3931744649119091,"score_spread":0.3149175666077779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321435057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1624237,0.008546633,0.020386867,0.3625549,0.00084053155,0.000082356106,0.00007716752,0.00003552,0.44505233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715864,0.0032404638,0.001959074,0.008670541,0.00023987987,0.00005594642,0.000015419211,0.000050074254,0.014182171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928294,0.0057848203,0.00007656086,0.00023394373,0.0004150954,0.0006602095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891432,0.008804796,0.0005418426,0.000375706,0.0005428996,0.0005915412],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01115891,0.00037799755,0.00032840637,0.0012022612,0.019016923,0.011988612,0.0016517155,0.0057205046,0.006046318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009122447,0.00035916918,0.0003080422,0.001066859,0.099816605,0.012430432,0.009988581,0.006235663,0.0004930532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008972308,0.000010825467,0.00036224036,0.000042855914,0.0000012639252,0.00041931946,0.22631691,0.00015154293,0.00006640604,0.76532614,0.0033469726,0.0039465684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012817557,0.000024432113,0.0005873994,0.0005409133,0.000003748809,0.00041534533,0.46412987,0.00036088165,0.00024809418,0.30045426,0.23320371,0.000018583214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027551394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04124492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012801843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010839349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0928843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360613781","doi":"10.1007/s10691-022-09512-7","title":"Roundtable on Deregistration and Gender Law Reform Internationally","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Carleton University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Public international law; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; CLARITY; Jurisdiction; Legislation; Legislature; Conversation; International law; Public administration","score_opus":0.22299722189035845,"score_gpt":0.4310475997306933,"score_spread":0.20805037784033484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360613781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024085345,0.012049386,0.0026533857,0.7648018,0.04165135,0.00029997414,0.0002013284,0.00018053727,0.15407683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3168281,0.007924006,0.0035931163,0.33923894,0.013359516,0.0009505918,0.00032003128,0.0005028602,0.31728286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98037374,0.010477004,0.0005308301,0.0014030478,0.0026728576,0.004542551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98501426,0.008565425,0.0007843105,0.0013943983,0.0017181826,0.00252351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026952958,0.0006857269,0.0008765988,0.0009512958,0.012402752,0.016605219,0.0037461768,0.018787833,0.0418792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025666475,0.00062735245,0.0011978962,0.0017514827,0.008386467,0.023213018,0.016596967,0.02291445,0.0054720375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010893372,0.00022889955,0.00031945025,0.00029161546,0.000012106517,0.0007927475,0.06241736,0.00018725145,0.0011893491,0.4684449,0.42820248,0.037804954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015435771,0.00008240239,0.0007457774,0.00030141082,0.0000048914703,0.00008009795,0.03417674,0.00008952435,0.0004373346,0.011209311,0.95282656,0.000030483974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008634699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014866225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0418792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012461501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013718636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14254254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360952108","doi":"10.1007/s10691-023-09522-z","title":"Compromise on Parenting and Family Violence? Reforms to Canada’s Divorce Act","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Family law; Domestic violence; Seriousness; Statute; Law; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Poison control; Criminology; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.05230623951120976,"score_gpt":0.3501105774015084,"score_spread":0.29780433789029864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360952108","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22280638,0.012162252,0.0004942407,0.6269704,0.0021552949,0.00015802248,0.0007559176,0.00003859051,0.13445891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80260473,0.005566926,0.0006937877,0.139475,0.00058018125,0.000117147596,0.00019696087,0.00004185867,0.050723366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98175806,0.002738954,0.00046489824,0.00080241,0.0044690412,0.0097667035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736118,0.0066028843,0.0011039953,0.0007098661,0.008990457,0.0089811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010659991,0.00042342496,0.0007616099,0.0023797024,0.037085027,0.01226299,0.005574181,0.015246337,0.0084169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037324764,0.0008654188,0.001026172,0.0032491153,0.010029716,0.0029832274,0.005587712,0.017023679,0.00038457668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027024286,0.00042463708,0.065293096,0.00023203288,0.00018102667,0.0012496667,0.046468798,0.0027306776,0.0007410226,0.6239426,0.20514202,0.05332426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027987536,0.00017723754,0.16287614,0.00134417,0.00034666798,0.00024629242,0.09668293,0.0018901697,0.0011294321,0.025100073,0.70953643,0.00039070117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99672264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.766924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23307596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5247092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88952315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379209154","doi":"10.1007/s10691-023-09534-9","title":"Correction: Compromise on Parenting and Family Violence? Reforms to Canada’s Divorce Act","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Public international law; Political science; Political philosophy; Human rights; Law; Family law; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.0487212535823784,"score_gpt":0.3319946481442398,"score_spread":0.2832733945618614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379209154","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011259743,0.0020132323,0.0002359097,0.6718319,0.31687722,0.00006554338,0.0013423277,0.00016104238,0.0063468055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045379862,0.007218209,0.0010343759,0.6551138,0.12065698,0.00035353727,0.0006217798,0.00035465334,0.1692668],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225956,0.0007539578,0.0009787244,0.0010664813,0.0025365758,0.0024047557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564812,0.011592355,0.0017770773,0.001879574,0.023996666,0.004273183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00530629,0.0017183601,0.003687979,0.0032646116,0.020296855,0.007817028,0.008892234,0.057148736,0.024256738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07925889,0.001996005,0.0019560533,0.0048223888,0.007149295,0.0027579241,0.0034612552,0.051429816,0.0063854097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013878779,0.0000044745157,0.00019971523,0.000040613246,0.000011927366,0.0003238151,0.00021938569,0.000046535748,0.000010874148,0.001236636,0.9964669,0.0014252051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008699837,0.000014596194,0.004793605,0.00084150047,0.000091952315,0.000752325,0.0028406612,0.00072781526,0.000251079,0.002638704,0.9868095,0.00015117553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83354694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8750445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16645306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053364053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104565874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3871851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387373508","doi":"10.1007/s10691-023-09536-7","title":"The Anti-trafficking Security Assemblage: Examining Police and NGO Cooperation, Negotiation, and Knowledge Production in Ontario, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Organised crime; Securitization; Public relations; Human security; Political science; Work (physics); Sociology; Public administration; Criminology; Business; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.03313610601843653,"score_gpt":0.31237594918211353,"score_spread":0.279239843163677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387373508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673208,0.00084800273,0.0002588778,0.0036181516,0.000027269443,0.00013012142,0.00091156276,0.000013181221,0.026872082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98169094,0.0009261714,0.0005447163,0.00027257332,0.0000070267383,0.000059486305,0.0003233997,0.000018238943,0.016157355],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975471,0.00032466053,0.00008995478,0.00019061616,0.00088450825,0.0009631583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99080443,0.0018878676,0.0010667144,0.00022537215,0.0039816345,0.0020340725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021853487,0.000253166,0.00049832615,0.004671878,0.023296552,0.005934742,0.0020114111,0.000814123,0.0055473805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006199514,0.0005890611,0.00028150482,0.009143052,0.0060460917,0.0016581173,0.004272547,0.0013117903,0.00031323606],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021272214,0.00012465763,0.30688444,0.000305972,0.00007031157,0.0010691731,0.62053543,0.0005577465,0.0013201789,0.013710347,0.012617573,0.04259146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010392343,0.000024552959,0.40674308,0.0001874044,0.000023565042,0.00007427317,0.54594153,0.00043538844,0.00021944128,0.00047469026,0.045828305,0.000037345682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99884975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99976784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97670346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14452401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22366904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390051767","doi":"10.1007/s10691-023-09539-4","title":"Polyamory and Legal Parentage: The Possibilities of C.C. (Re) and BCSC 767 for Expanding Conceptions of Kinship in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Human sexuality; Daughter; Sociology; Political science; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.1207571353207673,"score_gpt":0.3997569897677116,"score_spread":0.2789998544469443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390051767","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058918446,0.05050468,0.006614643,0.49266338,0.0015308345,0.000093837996,0.00031988477,0.00005770731,0.3892965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8537197,0.018063072,0.0037969535,0.020671785,0.0003985135,0.000080336395,0.000064145,0.00004489537,0.10316063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977665,0.0007373043,0.000039130777,0.00016735708,0.0006130916,0.0006766901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615437,0.0010711203,0.00015581156,0.00012647317,0.0016938392,0.0007983614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033780346,0.00027910687,0.00035270446,0.0014822743,0.018137177,0.0054316013,0.0015895965,0.00317681,0.008490749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054434454,0.00018336605,0.00027292324,0.0021372908,0.017333454,0.003935269,0.003352518,0.0040126042,0.0004423245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002443663,0.000022805027,0.0062340423,0.00007248542,0.0000069979005,0.0002342772,0.026050804,0.00020433824,0.00013991559,0.8743354,0.05676194,0.035912484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034503533,0.000032242857,0.029574832,0.0008473921,0.000044728156,0.0003422776,0.076363176,0.0017463393,0.00045207067,0.22912401,0.66131437,0.00012415793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9546114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04538858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034826167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07619542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2526827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399460091","doi":"10.1007/s10691-024-09550-3","title":"Prison Abolition for Collective Freedom: Facilitating Co-Resistance to Binary Colonial Prisons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Human rights; Prison; Public international law; Resistance (ecology); Political science; Law; Political philosophy; Criminology; Sociology; International law; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.0548922403886491,"score_gpt":0.3923639774928079,"score_spread":0.3374717371041588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399460091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8708207,0.00017105178,0.0047063744,0.010502734,0.0001482514,0.0001328993,0.000009127883,0.000103536535,0.11340541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99486804,0.000020623982,0.0006938481,0.00027352618,0.000012359015,0.00004446444,0.0000024788778,0.000013890036,0.0040708343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943007,0.0036486262,0.000121113895,0.00034617694,0.00037945627,0.0012039628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755191,0.015334105,0.0024731618,0.0020545882,0.0011391308,0.0034798495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068580206,0.00020178859,0.00027851542,0.0005653196,0.009466763,0.005534976,0.0014081408,0.001866092,0.016715406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03404694,0.00024896272,0.00031660922,0.00035881033,0.00684207,0.003675225,0.0088573415,0.0034394553,0.0008734155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007686859,0.0023036045,0.02603656,0.0004255522,0.000050136063,0.0017384922,0.30612007,0.0016946753,0.010303534,0.4477796,0.02090474,0.1818744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059288327,0.0018276012,0.08475033,0.0014588789,0.00020675392,0.0011990926,0.4117833,0.013963734,0.012954533,0.16989514,0.30113587,0.00023188912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004051087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0125190215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016715406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027360271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007402373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055918634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400007803","doi":"10.1007/s10691-024-09554-z","title":"Correction: Prison Abolition for Collective Freedom: Facilitating Co-Resistance to Binary Colonial Prisons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"African history and culture studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Human rights; Colonialism; Public international law; Political science; Resistance (ecology); Law; Political philosophy; Criminology; Sociology; International law; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.039688702303882065,"score_gpt":0.3566439045809107,"score_spread":0.31695520227702867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400007803","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00081850763,0.0007745133,0.0007865496,0.33154565,0.6582994,0.000059993155,0.0012429667,0.00040795113,0.006064445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06575626,0.0059209205,0.004482397,0.3127276,0.25303847,0.0006494499,0.0010550703,0.0014102617,0.3549595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945253,0.0013398066,0.0008297848,0.00071260286,0.0015139272,0.0010785492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9620675,0.014376408,0.0020051922,0.0025637236,0.016666494,0.0023207236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00468108,0.0020558743,0.0023048017,0.0020854839,0.009781816,0.007135992,0.005234336,0.027708571,0.043723546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08840345,0.0015438426,0.0011754816,0.0023524046,0.0067643607,0.0037417554,0.0042973165,0.029823005,0.017676478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029193337,0.000004678387,0.000098692,0.0001611901,0.000012535199,0.00043582174,0.00042659693,0.000047723195,0.000030448087,0.002131105,0.99429744,0.002324531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059560385,0.000016930604,0.0013122557,0.0006358336,0.00004726867,0.00076169055,0.0018382582,0.0005042121,0.00034510856,0.0027418218,0.9916557,0.00008136361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06043323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08010786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06043323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008147832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015123048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14626986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411716400","doi":"10.1007/s10691-025-09576-1","title":"Fieldwork, Ethics, and the Importance of ‘Wide Reflexivity’: Feminist Socio-legal Research in Difficult Sites","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Reflexivity; Political philosophy; Public international law; Philosophy of medicine; Human rights; Sociology; Ontology; Political science; Social philosophy; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Epistemology; International law; Politics; Social change; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.42342489457896537,"score_gpt":0.6135878598124862,"score_spread":0.19016296523352083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411716400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2690726,0.0128702605,0.13318107,0.41551697,0.0022387083,0.0025182434,0.00018033436,0.00017736897,0.16424444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652071,0.0015986997,0.017176729,0.009372637,0.00026480778,0.002169837,0.000027556129,0.00016166487,0.004021082],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.57704914,0.39872095,0.0038064686,0.0062545496,0.00950429,0.004664635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33877203,0.61684114,0.008205702,0.019657085,0.010072256,0.0064517544],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26048535,0.0007242962,0.0017190573,0.0047678608,0.041487087,0.030722784,0.0059103044,0.011295437,0.007925057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32975337,0.0021866257,0.0006425238,0.004820389,0.1964228,0.037300937,0.025226684,0.015215305,0.0007174364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004007517,0.000091328744,0.0016274682,0.0005272308,0.000018573413,0.00028603637,0.7244729,0.000121467594,0.00029127224,0.25274637,0.0036133965,0.016163813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006564295,0.000054237746,0.0011360174,0.00225676,0.00001594678,0.0003137668,0.686143,0.00028177365,0.000541402,0.26668504,0.042451948,0.000054409797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071610897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008549887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73951465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011582842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0301699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9119532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}