{"meta":{"query_hash":"dbbe8506a579","filters":{"venue":"Feminist Legal Studies"},"cohort_total":29,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":29,"exported":29,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dbbe8506a579","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Feminist+Legal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1591788322","doi":"10.1023/a:1009205626028","title":"Barriers to Gender Equality in the Canadian Legal Establishment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Queen's University","funders":"Canadian Bar Association","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Political science; Privilege (computing); Legislature; Government (linguistics); Practice of law; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.10928262914200731,"score_gpt":0.4240002035658897,"score_spread":0.3147175744238824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591788322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045694694,0.00014140304,7.727415e-7,0.19952135,0.0004854582,0.00028381325,0.000018541688,0.00002296148,0.753831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591482,0.000042962456,0.000083777566,0.027601076,0.00030500753,0.00010174768,0.0000035483426,0.0000052602477,0.012708414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983291,0.00035869522,0.00024567882,0.00020557092,0.00043673388,0.00042422177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990729,0.00026996364,0.00004036215,0.00019334654,0.00013183862,0.0002915797],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002183566,0.000103126076,0.00012608407,0.00009823549,0.0022452008,0.00063552236,0.0003370327,0.000054860633,0.0019805117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019311174,0.000082229686,0.000034434473,0.0010244084,0.0002584591,0.00046764262,0.000017797873,0.0003248919,0.00024476615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014856112,0.000042059797,0.008692152,0.0000052416003,0.000037309885,0.000014412281,0.3638064,0.000016532742,9.4312804e-7,0.3998895,0.22414376,0.0033368126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000623411,0.000013190743,0.006833403,0.0000040945847,0.0000072717808,0.0000011138177,0.12248447,4.940297e-7,0.0000020629263,0.0003883203,0.87010235,0.0001008713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75653994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94209695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9134535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005890409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026850686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591811971","doi":"10.1007/s10691-006-9017-y","title":"A pregnant pause: federalism, equality and the maternity and parental leave debate in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionality; Federalism; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03063211017214136,"score_gpt":0.3148618371547263,"score_spread":0.284229726982585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591811971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607801,0.0053168833,1.1123184e-7,0.009503022,0.0002865212,0.00026141023,0.000045100915,0.00002111724,0.02378578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99526286,0.002960387,0.0000027492752,0.00052130764,0.00022545368,0.00004550134,0.0000012324144,0.0000049853575,0.00097552466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987646,0.00022257812,0.00023460302,0.00017973242,0.00025154304,0.00034698742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994412,0.00034039858,0.00008253059,0.00006145825,0.00003358525,0.000040844927],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051539706,0.00013319582,0.00032944063,0.000017215889,0.0016795651,0.00009556045,0.000087169254,0.000037845653,0.0000016667209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001593165,0.00007830623,0.000026290933,0.00011970822,0.0014636649,0.000074305084,0.00016737655,0.00011478496,5.571098e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016990863,0.000056781893,0.5959202,0.00009786318,0.00031783106,0.000058615944,0.14392829,0.0000022500615,0.0000046792807,0.25103635,0.006413044,0.0019942122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001620206,0.00003105708,0.69369715,0.00012881347,0.00007839869,0.0000046511213,0.2582844,0.000008546694,0.000029123843,0.017137399,0.028596058,0.0003841983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23389894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025550704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020097064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W15971032","doi":"10.1007/s10691-013-9245-x","title":"Jeffory A. Clymer: Family Money: Property, Race, and Literature in the Nineteenth Century","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Literature: history, themes, analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Property (philosophy); Political philosophy; Public international law; International political economy; Law and economics; Property rights; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; International law; Politics; Epistemology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02163359649269191,"score_gpt":0.2277514712527142,"score_spread":0.20611787476002227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W15971032","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12779833,0.48591438,7.760456e-7,0.007557148,0.0016012172,0.001175864,0.00014017086,0.00016529759,0.37564683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94155276,0.002906155,0.0000407269,0.0033432706,0.00097151415,0.00022616926,0.00003639814,0.000030214776,0.050892763],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984794,0.00012691077,0.0003520505,0.0003773503,0.00030749524,0.00035675042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992019,0.00010284325,0.000116285344,0.00034189204,0.00018295574,0.000054100117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002448094,0.0003211326,0.0004504096,0.0001423355,0.0006754144,0.0008827283,0.00029908188,0.000071478724,0.00013476735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006440064,0.00015927393,0.00011699643,0.00013621607,0.0006462992,0.00046948745,0.00013652649,0.00038721366,0.00007664531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003771968,0.00014540301,0.00080209377,0.0001548732,0.00034905435,0.00006322429,0.40715703,5.0242147e-7,0.00009043086,0.03016777,0.55846477,0.0025671334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002931903,0.00009165896,0.00067037117,0.00011553897,0.0000788515,0.000008020946,0.039784025,0.000013449329,0.000009176717,0.0003107927,0.95836633,0.0002585998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041529143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81375444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057788176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019796435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.851217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608658107","doi":"10.1007/s10691-008-9097-y","title":"Dorothy E. Chunn, Susan B. Boyd, Hester Lessard (eds): Reaction and resistance: Feminism, law and social change","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Political philosophy; Public international law; Law; Political science; Gender studies; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.16369510447259625,"score_gpt":0.3681918065269923,"score_spread":0.20449670205439605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608658107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42378098,0.034516,0.0000026693772,0.025047218,0.0015995994,0.0010254855,0.000105436,0.0003708021,0.51355183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96413654,0.017355414,0.00011971961,0.002891945,0.0016252571,0.00014282097,0.00000883003,0.00003079211,0.013688664],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737054,0.00023444717,0.00042774715,0.000650756,0.000637499,0.0006790195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989778,0.00031057379,0.00020418763,0.0001920172,0.0001717482,0.00014371745],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007531589,0.00036779855,0.0006779239,0.000089927315,0.0054522897,0.00014927272,0.00017521666,0.00021919385,0.000009423516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010038492,0.00034777855,0.0000946533,0.00026738076,0.0034949866,0.0004114079,0.00023989132,0.00027198895,0.000012763592],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020108168,0.00011772199,0.007958311,0.00021975825,0.00033257593,0.0000953923,0.8258988,8.127159e-9,0.00007119558,0.12160883,0.041720472,0.0017758247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048552375,0.00009349726,0.01125472,0.00003562633,0.000058701346,0.000012903499,0.22315986,1.12248735e-7,0.00003293834,0.0008546179,0.76363534,0.00037613697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020917777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011595495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7219149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015606149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007751261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W187902244","doi":"10.1007/s10691-012-9229-2","title":"Anne McNevin: Contesting Citizenship: Irregular Migrants and New Frontiers of the Political","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Public international law; Political philosophy; Politics; Political science; Gender studies; International political economy; Sociology; Human rights; Political economy; Law; International law","score_opus":0.04373565114786548,"score_gpt":0.309835909776305,"score_spread":0.2661002586284395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W187902244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91291237,0.013777929,0.00012095608,0.019208316,0.0010330891,0.0006462252,0.000016925289,0.00006903012,0.05221516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99248576,0.00009207911,0.0003547979,0.00044661583,0.00030825989,0.000012511899,0.0000011017153,0.0000057278003,0.0062931525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989441,0.00012258408,0.00023678332,0.00015563372,0.0002685679,0.00027235557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933004,0.00016223015,0.000100517005,0.000109136105,0.00019140588,0.00010665588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022694138,0.00010439709,0.00021453742,0.000024855452,0.00061583315,0.00008086696,0.00013834008,0.00005793473,0.000024668625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015640695,0.000068997026,0.00006060668,0.00014042974,0.0008086091,0.00013284574,0.000042370793,0.000089650865,0.0000059162667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011979953,0.00002663355,0.11522162,0.00003169058,0.00013077277,9.131008e-7,0.044477604,3.1339738e-7,0.00041938812,0.3796488,0.4569525,0.003077758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009740696,0.0003037611,0.17673703,0.00043048695,0.00019750775,0.000009306195,0.40016252,0.00015308122,0.003063593,0.076107755,0.34116903,0.0006918716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008141468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005307043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35568494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054155644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107035456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969922824","doi":"10.1007/s10691-012-9198-5","title":"Comparing Women in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Situated; State (computer science); Root (linguistics); Feminism; Gender equality; Gender studies; Power (physics); Action (physics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07023185232347437,"score_gpt":0.3311269559579014,"score_spread":0.26089510363442703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969922824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89052004,0.0043764687,1.9491824e-7,0.0015693898,0.00097150385,0.00017097173,0.000004051787,0.000043207838,0.10234415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965927,0.0002917151,0.000045259556,0.00032141723,0.00048827883,0.00009316095,7.563344e-7,0.00000821008,0.0021585007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977944,0.00013623014,0.0002637609,0.00017348769,0.00046053686,0.0011716005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926263,0.00027334242,0.00008106088,0.000090213674,0.0000681071,0.00022466743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007520156,0.0001640802,0.00041456998,0.000023763216,0.000959547,0.000042803716,0.00020968182,0.00003767254,0.000056851557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065936573,0.00013702636,0.000037243197,0.0002726203,0.00032989643,0.00025016826,0.00018250356,0.000182003,0.00003690197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008358435,0.000028266577,0.8289669,0.000015848262,0.00007641944,0.0000070704227,0.15814053,0.0000042428774,0.0000038055962,0.004429865,0.0079255495,0.00039312034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015408038,0.0000068186896,0.27975443,0.000019401978,0.000006070321,4.1070797e-7,0.28959215,0.0000013920334,0.000011345623,0.000035098874,0.43024188,0.00017693156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97708666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99281263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5492125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005553225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037054188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018206738","doi":"10.1007/s10691-006-9028-8","title":"Losing the Feminist Voice? Debates on The Legal Recognition of Same Sex Partnerships in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Economic Justice; Political science; Narrative; Legislature; Gender studies; Law; House of Commons; Disadvantaged; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10104251470509097,"score_gpt":0.3455529708465397,"score_spread":0.24451045614144873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018206738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7907388,0.0022077383,4.8061395e-7,0.01890469,0.0010699981,0.00033989994,0.00012053748,0.000024399398,0.18659344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98947555,0.00010917926,0.0000057170214,0.0027109676,0.0007303081,0.00008072671,0.000014574738,0.000022865812,0.0068501364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978905,0.00037220714,0.0005763726,0.00030815435,0.00032494808,0.00052784727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978443,0.0014065445,0.00026092495,0.00036628693,0.00007525509,0.000046736306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006360144,0.00023800353,0.00036395158,0.000066817745,0.0005797927,0.000064450185,0.00030386748,0.000077182056,0.00007614617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021633963,0.00015039096,0.00007980788,0.00030520852,0.0004041837,0.000051302435,0.00006898405,0.00042293212,0.000092717775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031603765,0.00038521006,0.41308326,0.00045555425,0.0003217798,0.00015475843,0.009118641,0.000015467254,0.00003421617,0.04021389,0.5318139,0.004087273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014779142,0.0004408343,0.43832278,0.0002490529,0.00025126134,0.000096403164,0.051848363,0.000017145085,0.00054802524,0.0062995655,0.4996586,0.00079004857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9373805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9675474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19873671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036926134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004000586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61327654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025518801","doi":"10.1007/s10691-010-9152-3","title":"Autonomy for Mothers? Relational Theory and Parenting Apart","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Normative; Nature versus nurture; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Feminism; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05135832612690287,"score_gpt":0.355402017298026,"score_spread":0.3040436911711231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025518801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95736367,0.0034851118,0.00026748498,0.007746356,0.0006548357,0.00072397984,0.000013234319,0.00023938066,0.029505964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911538,0.000035891888,0.0051186467,0.00036868037,0.00031676108,0.0001357865,0.000004339392,0.000010396015,0.0028557414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993622,0.000010077869,0.00015334442,0.00023231143,0.00007239796,0.00016968315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993543,0.00030655685,0.00006158973,0.00015064313,0.00008888799,0.00003799566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004676441,0.00008901499,0.00019446385,0.000038837556,0.00025131326,0.000010477794,0.000030129671,0.00005792417,0.000010552656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017602668,0.000066760884,0.00003477038,0.00004846745,0.00033224514,0.00004338371,0.000046763875,0.00018541662,0.0000052683667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046557194,0.00008913195,0.17324595,0.00037705863,0.00029340398,0.000006873148,0.0025015974,2.635082e-7,0.0017568326,0.7857424,0.0044497116,0.031071192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007487508,0.00025068322,0.07117712,0.000047014288,0.000071326365,0.000050710478,0.004014721,0.000013642843,0.0018621052,0.01955046,0.9020848,0.00012866883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000032621488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043450113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8976351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020796722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007581015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.272243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033033098","doi":"10.1007/s10691-015-9279-3","title":"Sex Work’s Governance: Stuff and Nuisance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Corporate governance; Work (physics); Political science; Business; Law; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.054978676246540924,"score_gpt":0.34971638885360495,"score_spread":0.29473771260706405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033033098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37080282,0.108001806,0.0000024651479,0.0071011344,0.0016069859,0.00019708206,0.0000027778867,0.0001768036,0.51210815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93798023,0.006192672,0.00012925749,0.00024854625,0.0005464127,0.000012877241,5.591501e-7,0.000008671786,0.05488077],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890137,0.00007563608,0.00014404528,0.00022130458,0.00036240896,0.0002952542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994662,0.00012360937,0.00007165152,0.00010628827,0.00009545114,0.00013680989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047129462,0.00011902873,0.00022987391,0.00001303455,0.000590761,0.00010220677,0.00014562265,0.00008550777,0.000017796468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004552622,0.00009633964,0.000029784924,0.00025790514,0.0007628934,0.0001051922,0.00010259557,0.00014882037,0.00007520674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005535236,0.00008870161,0.066541545,0.000014465376,0.00021530407,0.0000635537,0.57162,0.000004458667,0.0000017330943,0.021836283,0.32480574,0.014752879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023964325,0.000039095226,0.0018076563,0.00004738245,0.00001684129,0.0000011976783,0.14212433,7.3422626e-7,0.000016430098,0.00079911674,0.85477465,0.00013291767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070066476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018853598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5671774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009798404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007732102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4543716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087264935","doi":"10.1023/b:fest.0000004706.13979.73","title":"Vrinda Narain, Gender and Community: Muslim Women's Rights in India, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political philosophy; Gender studies; Public international law; Political science; Sociology; Gender equality; Politics; Law; International law","score_opus":0.035966673482520826,"score_gpt":0.29816998008482226,"score_spread":0.26220330660230146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087264935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7188053,0.02059187,0.0000010039354,0.000029550898,0.00020342045,0.00017861066,0.0000063860903,0.000023512886,0.26016036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605451,0.03817242,0.00022455138,0.00009072826,0.00003299807,0.0000051558154,0.0000012017033,0.0000043283326,0.0009234907],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848914,0.0005029103,0.00017891105,0.00017126989,0.00027838844,0.00037936613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993119,0.00023898119,0.000092887225,0.00014998848,0.0000964311,0.00010977575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001217837,0.00013306855,0.00029366947,0.0000057439074,0.0013220566,0.000029725328,0.0001901208,0.00010019093,0.00009818937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001341969,0.00013192752,0.000042970056,0.000055621225,0.0006017831,0.00022991103,0.00011834059,0.0001495755,0.0000020125249],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000142347135,0.00012601915,0.003691215,0.000034879897,0.00010982367,0.000008883877,0.9638519,2.4889334e-7,0.000002454379,0.008188144,0.023928752,0.000043441327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032352132,0.000044749515,0.037671383,0.000015864543,0.000007982833,5.350611e-7,0.68435395,1.380794e-7,0.0000051181855,0.0011498478,0.27630275,0.00012418462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4169672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22283539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27949798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010265047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015528491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095307881","doi":"10.1007/s10691-014-9263-3","title":"Sexual Assault and the Meaning of Power and Authority for Women with Mental Disabilities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Doctrine; Criminology; Psychology; Sexual violence; Power (physics); Meaning (existential); Economic Justice; Public international law; Criminal law; Law; Social psychology; International law; Political science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.031581546580396004,"score_gpt":0.32370811175730513,"score_spread":0.2921265651769091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095307881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704713,0.0011532429,0.0000070042684,0.0056800605,0.00016665031,0.0005682202,0.000030100548,0.00003829759,0.02188508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968406,0.00011632874,0.0002911392,0.00008777863,0.0001329328,0.0001475628,6.264115e-7,0.000007348418,0.0023756686],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987434,0.0001753325,0.00019497385,0.00022952224,0.0003429338,0.00031379578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981639,0.0014258499,0.00011020906,0.0000800484,0.0001576557,0.00006237841],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013551777,0.0001542048,0.00040555574,0.000010015769,0.0017769935,0.000084679035,0.00010773869,0.000050218514,0.0000059482777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016405158,0.00008247909,0.000028567936,0.00007139608,0.0044397903,0.00013331785,0.00015420809,0.00010177571,4.885576e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039328623,0.00003316104,0.023544692,0.00010894286,0.0003797981,1.9554284e-7,0.8026786,4.1677364e-7,0.000029079793,0.16992329,0.0012969874,0.0016115457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013190749,0.00040587943,0.011187811,0.000028284021,0.00005072793,9.794793e-7,0.8740916,0.000009113855,0.000026899559,0.00231217,0.11038413,0.00018330016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016710133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002554212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16761112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010897621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019648543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283669943","doi":"10.1007/s10691-016-9309-9","title":"Recognition of Gendered Experiences of Harm at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: The Promise and the Pitfalls","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Society of Legal Scholars","keywords":"Harm; Scrutiny; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Public international law; Human rights; Population; Gender studies; Political science; International law","score_opus":0.06929769269406194,"score_gpt":0.32827403567670205,"score_spread":0.2589763429826401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283669943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96382725,0.008444687,9.686119e-7,0.009449582,0.00019282942,0.0005914631,0.000019230425,0.00000561348,0.017468376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99560314,0.003483023,0.000004406124,0.00014379692,0.000073457246,0.00016094481,4.372123e-7,0.000003997599,0.00052679755],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998382,0.0005260853,0.000310664,0.0001592348,0.0004211744,0.00020083971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816436,0.0012198812,0.0002661457,0.00020520094,0.00012504931,0.000019388468],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019511828,0.00011074277,0.00025437438,0.00001689642,0.00072654005,0.000028333578,0.00037307775,0.000044184493,0.000029298026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039342864,0.00003845092,0.00008647161,0.0001465737,0.0052579413,0.00007733235,0.00013174137,0.00007986869,0.0000013107808],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001517004,0.000053643478,0.0021329462,0.000026474823,0.000082048115,0.0000018095054,0.9884107,1.16773556e-7,0.00013405195,0.004776063,0.0016586836,0.002571738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065962254,0.00009558761,0.0061783586,0.00005964766,0.000053497475,0.0000030034817,0.9762954,0.0000013349114,0.00081209186,0.002557989,0.01320097,0.00008247894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018563562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025012544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031775888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025579468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083447994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99744916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2435814675","doi":"10.1007/s10691-016-9321-0","title":"Sarah Keenan: Subversive Property: Law and the Production of Spaces of Belonging","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Public international law; Property (philosophy); Political philosophy; Production (economics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; International law; Politics; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.0227574983672201,"score_gpt":0.28407745482752195,"score_spread":0.26131995646030187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2435814675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43702635,0.025048902,0.000004655103,0.14249538,0.0017681656,0.001291479,0.000029192814,0.000091002155,0.39224488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829698,0.0022792255,0.00004152465,0.00011909666,0.00018822985,0.000011826597,1.1693695e-7,0.000002957664,0.0143872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931586,0.000088713314,0.00012287631,0.000126491,0.00022021004,0.00012587472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944085,0.00017452578,0.00012139794,0.00008220867,0.00016346523,0.000017573013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005149671,0.00006573187,0.00018982221,0.0000027316028,0.0006511675,0.000015652,0.00010132494,0.000040246672,0.0000066467164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004102044,0.000025019845,0.000056015782,0.000110780195,0.00377328,0.00012595467,0.00006505056,0.000043580367,0.0000013634237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010512177,0.000032918997,0.0024965745,0.000079448095,0.0002425015,9.2403315e-7,0.2600695,3.5709658e-7,0.0008167427,0.7235354,0.010706155,0.0019143502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005324662,0.000079229976,0.0003676988,0.00026698064,0.00008313187,0.0000016322041,0.2246827,1.6238268e-7,0.005391385,0.0035739897,0.7648986,0.00012203979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010205233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011520332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7541924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026306785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029624704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760873196","doi":"10.1007/s10691-017-9356-x","title":"Racialized Women, the Law and the Violence of White Settler Colonialism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Conceptualization; Criminology; White (mutation); Public international law; Colonialism; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; International law; Poison control; Political science; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.03621312429659344,"score_gpt":0.3106083753975901,"score_spread":0.27439525110099666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760873196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92632675,0.00062497996,0.000003524649,0.039828546,0.0001733068,0.00015527803,0.0000082374545,0.000011805616,0.032867562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900714,0.0003467387,0.000023146773,0.007961375,0.00003018945,0.000051294417,2.9182715e-7,0.0000031135337,0.0015124587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999336,0.00008758287,0.00015608038,0.00014165317,0.00013702971,0.0001416336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992635,0.00017961155,0.00018152293,0.00033925264,0.000014648294,0.000021413238],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046273193,0.00008739413,0.00019586943,0.0000046063515,0.0021674074,0.00004740982,0.00035495276,0.000031198513,0.00013324771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002879177,0.000043344353,0.00003730061,0.000030180749,0.0060923984,0.00008867325,0.0005755365,0.000085945445,0.000026261661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010961434,0.00013165131,0.5098109,0.00005158944,0.0007676972,0.000021256958,0.110030055,0.00002490554,0.00043102656,0.31415665,0.059702337,0.0037757484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019699126,0.00008355847,0.45067623,0.000048425674,0.00014551537,0.000012794004,0.010895131,0.00005561977,0.00031831954,0.013468498,0.52210283,0.00022312773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007169743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056117127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46240053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021506841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000062449185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763310201","doi":"10.1007/s10691-017-9355-y","title":"Wench Tactics? Openings in Conditions of Closure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Closure (psychology); Sociology; Publishing; Law; Economic Justice; Public relations; Political science; Media studies; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06415313747011338,"score_gpt":0.41568183122572055,"score_spread":0.3515286937556072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763310201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30528164,0.0019466116,5.048714e-7,0.01010854,0.0006871164,0.00020044016,0.000043394775,0.000028645469,0.6817031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98193413,0.0007610277,0.000097384196,0.00012226812,0.0001865069,0.000020709524,0.0000017166457,0.0000038621106,0.01687237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923074,0.00004863388,0.00016080863,0.0001359379,0.00023118165,0.00019272433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993801,0.00009770751,0.00018479815,0.00018274998,0.00011789804,0.000036707697],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040366073,0.00007513667,0.00020692147,0.0000046082814,0.001941488,0.00011073112,0.0003619998,0.00007366722,0.00008025302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074312394,0.00006444646,0.000075688506,0.00007380521,0.0014007683,0.000260366,0.00011738595,0.00014868805,0.000016496862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001430993,0.000085071566,0.12717696,0.000052455263,0.00015723563,0.000029888333,0.2143281,0.0000012093379,0.00012691003,0.56357414,0.09426457,0.00018917477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030504045,0.000034447665,0.024984071,0.000090217094,0.000027522725,9.778927e-7,0.11685462,4.0115586e-7,0.00020778342,0.0052540856,0.8521033,0.00013752753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017147142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052305763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7578387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005392419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000781601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771757530","doi":"10.1007/s10691-018-9364-5","title":"Judging in Marriage’s Shadow","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cohabitation; Shadow (psychology); Openness to experience; Operationalization; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Law; Property (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Political science; Social psychology; Gender studies; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.062378099473101266,"score_gpt":0.37685382608982915,"score_spread":0.3144757266167279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771757530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39595708,0.0042255484,0.0000064939672,0.015634965,0.0023766865,0.0006034031,0.000013151103,0.0003171275,0.58086556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98839504,0.0004988414,0.00038535995,0.00068417727,0.0015388364,0.000067434936,0.0000011080175,0.000014105481,0.008415102],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790984,0.00018345013,0.00033554534,0.00039272188,0.00048326884,0.000695195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991225,0.0002912433,0.000107048174,0.0001512302,0.00022458479,0.00010338793],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084384746,0.00021906984,0.00040059653,0.00006293087,0.0019807112,0.00013597326,0.0003289435,0.00009996606,0.00017257173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015211343,0.0001810845,0.000093935814,0.00049560785,0.001910982,0.0002685669,0.00027376975,0.00021554207,0.00032875536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100411635,0.000197728,0.19024171,0.00008047614,0.00041563637,0.00012891974,0.5813553,0.0000027272595,0.00020720741,0.125283,0.08915447,0.012832429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043548841,0.00009214155,0.04201896,0.00010919355,0.000026219364,0.0000013142484,0.13063958,0.0000065916183,0.00012367913,0.0012890768,0.82485,0.00040771204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011524782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045970883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7356956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004954587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066903485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970890586","doi":"10.1007/s10691-019-09410-5","title":"The Politics of “Doing Exactly Nothing”: Feminist Legal Change and Bureaucratic Administration of Refugee Protection","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Refugee; Expansive; Political science; Politics; Law; Jurisprudence; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.04848994143138324,"score_gpt":0.33186345939377,"score_spread":0.28337351796238675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970890586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95312876,0.0024116773,0.000083187784,0.0027720286,0.00096455374,0.0014456492,0.000033051616,0.00006189165,0.039099235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390775,0.00042774563,0.00015025424,0.000110429435,0.00042021592,0.000082869745,0.0000061878054,0.000012051023,0.0048825103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998298,0.00017001972,0.00053353416,0.00023930488,0.0004913732,0.0002677733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987024,0.00026540871,0.00045542288,0.00020284837,0.00031747104,0.000056437082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090864813,0.00016766791,0.00031644548,0.00006504387,0.0010731757,0.0001393398,0.00015788831,0.00011617763,0.000012201746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056150515,0.00012433085,0.00007721201,0.0002318489,0.00065716676,0.00037073749,0.000043332904,0.00016559049,0.000006100765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022546302,0.00016806116,0.005889252,0.000509985,0.00021664015,0.0000029592384,0.22240041,0.0000020815169,0.0034432642,0.7590456,0.0011646427,0.006931649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004123849,0.0010919559,0.004208714,0.0002977805,0.00009261471,0.00000994141,0.08067489,0.00013188503,0.0067334906,0.0013123429,0.90472454,0.0003094524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022456583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007571132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9035599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010923632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020683339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82541084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044489824","doi":"10.1007/s10691-020-09431-5","title":"Sex, Sexism, and Judicial Misconduct: How the Canadian Judicial Council Perpetuates Sexism in the Legal Realm","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual misconduct; Political science; Law; Realm; Misconduct; Ideal (ethics); Judicial discretion; Criminology; Psychology; Judicial review","score_opus":0.11739559709326783,"score_gpt":0.3084875568402541,"score_spread":0.19109195974698626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044489824","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1033169,0.008346711,3.189896e-7,0.51370525,0.0007905786,0.0006865498,0.000096760974,0.00008222996,0.37297466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746953,0.0010994184,0.000017473849,0.017552003,0.0024277274,0.00005633925,0.000004730849,0.000013782196,0.004133221],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741024,0.0003551934,0.00021738098,0.00039092873,0.0010002584,0.00062601984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903613,0.00032076967,0.00009314809,0.00016231832,0.00018824734,0.00019936553],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016695092,0.00024303098,0.00035642472,0.000006893916,0.004425761,0.00062528404,0.00056845933,0.00019593172,0.000032043878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000974919,0.00014592151,0.00010642197,0.0004553616,0.002258376,0.00022301982,0.00010780935,0.0006529195,0.000015822228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016482376,0.000018700994,0.0015525842,0.00001630856,0.00010701485,0.000081110404,0.6387357,0.0000013239646,0.000013857622,0.0732222,0.28578243,0.00045230496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001783351,0.000049989438,0.00068597967,0.000013568259,0.000039261682,0.0000053318076,0.30539235,0.0000038520084,0.000008991731,0.001033155,0.6924281,0.00016105168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2890079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8769042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8713784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046015056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014599552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99687034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124653487","doi":"10.1007/s10691-012-9206-9","title":"Two Mothers in Law and Fact","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Lesbian; Kinship; Jurisdiction; Family law; Queer; Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0632047386437186,"score_gpt":0.3847897248492908,"score_spread":0.3215849862055722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124653487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8835077,0.020993348,0.0000014379323,0.0032099497,0.00018232566,0.00022982506,0.000002284803,0.00009490791,0.09177822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756217,0.00047900653,0.00035967532,0.0009881421,0.0001403364,0.000028572043,5.981085e-7,0.000007795431,0.00043372167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936545,0.000011775725,0.00012688304,0.00015276324,0.000080462276,0.00026266839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970096,0.00004853358,0.000029035456,0.00014466999,0.00002147233,0.000055331515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018246287,0.000090097994,0.00023619385,0.000043262953,0.000076365104,0.000005452057,0.000025477208,0.000033428067,0.0000050340877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021943294,0.00006487003,0.000018035105,0.00008851141,0.00040362054,0.00006562979,0.000056181714,0.00013959371,0.000014518435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014122935,0.00015218846,0.8872555,0.00023333238,0.0001019594,0.00002940542,0.0041002696,1.4490153e-7,0.00038266426,0.0981854,0.00197899,0.0074389065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020161083,0.0004972244,0.4047667,0.00015582626,0.000055424465,0.00013843081,0.01991796,0.0000016318703,0.005282986,0.0015989238,0.56530803,0.0002607511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000192461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042669402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56332904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048191672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012220134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2645323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W33917814","doi":"10.1007/s10691-011-9190-5","title":"Roundtable on Eve Darian-Smith, Religion, Race, Rights: Landmarks in the History of Modern Anglo-American Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Political philosophy; Public international law; Law; Human rights; Political science; Philosophy; International law; Sociology; Politics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.055792596148593276,"score_gpt":0.3113767344751245,"score_spread":0.2555841383265312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W33917814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007617376,0.0031927647,0.000024382576,0.0010929169,0.00046198381,0.00014324104,0.00002111779,0.00002612046,0.9874201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97716993,0.00024468347,0.00012720976,0.001876252,0.0001811793,0.00002677345,0.0000020544703,0.000005587392,0.020366304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986802,0.00022112532,0.0002465689,0.00019226533,0.0003545063,0.00030533125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990979,0.00037484977,0.00016717995,0.00020154554,0.000106468564,0.000052059368],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004986041,0.00012925145,0.00029646148,0.00003907382,0.0004314324,0.00002249645,0.00029783466,0.000042538013,0.00001878537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013066019,0.00009008077,0.000069002475,0.00017971316,0.003369467,0.0001615524,0.000041147377,0.0001661854,0.000011570826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000449054,0.0000941492,0.0020127667,0.0000064728774,0.00003954637,0.000017463253,0.027428122,0.0000015518871,8.081803e-7,0.92995733,0.040329583,0.00006727356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012897639,0.00010691961,0.0006382471,0.000032605098,0.000024226712,0.0000019173026,0.0063976846,0.0000010831003,0.000004921251,0.007969174,0.9845684,0.00012583833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07764674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018461753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005986115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006606673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321435057","doi":"10.1007/s10691-023-09520-1","title":"Towards a Feminist Geo-legal Ethic of Caring Within Medical Supply Chains: Lessons from Careless Supply During the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Principle of legality; Health care; Pandemic; Business; Philosophy of medicine; Law; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Medicine","score_opus":0.07825689830413116,"score_gpt":0.3931744649119091,"score_spread":0.3149175666077779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321435057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428814,0.008447019,0.000004625069,0.033724066,0.0019642164,0.00044500738,0.00015320216,0.00054597016,0.011834519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98708504,0.006225928,0.000027954147,0.001077376,0.0009897631,0.000113814865,0.00003001034,0.000041471892,0.0044086403],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953372,0.00058828155,0.00077017635,0.0006540021,0.0017794787,0.00087085663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690086,0.0017647955,0.00031670232,0.0004259157,0.00017148345,0.00042024686],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028345366,0.00037167576,0.0007839946,0.00014957285,0.0031226128,0.000193588,0.001101005,0.00054412376,0.00015277423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045606107,0.00026660718,0.0002441139,0.0011567804,0.0029643502,0.00011548139,0.0006752953,0.0012437858,0.000052610892],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014144965,0.000080914644,0.17439555,0.0002146599,0.00096018135,0.00054006826,0.7946836,0.00016140619,0.00013348435,0.020739373,0.006995628,0.0009537333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013282007,0.000107146414,0.024111625,0.00067225634,0.00024002136,0.00004106749,0.69950724,0.000111143345,0.00028533116,0.0014085474,0.2714891,0.00069830084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07258349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030472666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2644935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043438375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001557137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360613781","doi":"10.1007/s10691-022-09512-7","title":"Roundtable on Deregistration and Gender Law Reform Internationally","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Carleton University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Public international law; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; CLARITY; Jurisdiction; Legislation; Legislature; Conversation; International law; Public administration","score_opus":0.22299722189035845,"score_gpt":0.4310475997306933,"score_spread":0.20805037784033484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360613781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09076024,0.0011506501,0.000016732007,0.010530367,0.0010620616,0.00023484525,0.000027427199,0.0002905117,0.8959272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93392026,0.0012798031,0.000052789328,0.0013064552,0.00044375742,0.000045603294,0.000012338745,0.000011227454,0.06292777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850845,0.000075491625,0.00023747985,0.00031736682,0.00051147584,0.0003497526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993325,0.0002541669,0.00008184128,0.00012980503,0.00013180173,0.00006988657],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075296045,0.00015423672,0.00022214898,0.000061142884,0.0016774251,0.00027254902,0.00014860352,0.00006916633,0.00001011609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025774507,0.00013478757,0.000046363824,0.00023320511,0.0005464334,0.00031573896,0.00012246298,0.000114651084,0.000071205024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024317975,0.00003416903,0.0011175144,0.00003592887,0.00017882355,0.00001454448,0.11489234,0.0000026737875,0.000012090243,0.86949646,0.0136355115,0.00055559323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002622888,0.00011486272,0.0046719587,0.000022400543,0.000025320385,0.0000021236092,0.29432574,0.000007843306,0.00003858362,0.013723503,0.6865693,0.00023607566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030964874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013765986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.855773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039486738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073825744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360952108","doi":"10.1007/s10691-023-09522-z","title":"Compromise on Parenting and Family Violence? Reforms to Canada’s Divorce Act","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Family law; Domestic violence; Seriousness; Statute; Law; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Poison control; Criminology; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.05230623951120976,"score_gpt":0.3501105774015084,"score_spread":0.29780433789029864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360952108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7460159,0.00044148252,0.0000021823034,0.001109111,0.00095553935,0.00029083528,0.0000345623,0.00017193913,0.2509784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99523944,0.00079234596,0.000034075525,0.0013714784,0.00020310827,0.000044661796,0.0000034209831,0.000010944346,0.0023005165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839383,0.00005310967,0.00020973073,0.00033014218,0.0004707336,0.0005424788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993848,0.0001826879,0.000055966208,0.00014006053,0.00007597679,0.00016049958],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004898418,0.00016059069,0.00025145465,0.000056355188,0.0014590119,0.0000998409,0.00022980715,0.000041072286,0.000004490036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029941282,0.00012898134,0.000032986973,0.00035237995,0.00025607948,0.00006346055,0.00020602936,0.00012679091,0.00007999503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049154786,0.00021930996,0.1462948,0.0004658936,0.0006181389,0.0007082069,0.20716077,0.00032448056,0.0012352567,0.17869718,0.30288365,0.16090074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034890443,0.00020321603,0.3193815,0.00075202575,0.000030832514,0.0000014725391,0.1702038,0.00008814347,0.00023305432,0.00067817775,0.5074115,0.0006673767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39531028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25474364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24922352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020965662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024290747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379209154","doi":"10.1007/s10691-023-09534-9","title":"Correction: Compromise on Parenting and Family Violence? Reforms to Canada’s Divorce Act","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Public international law; Political science; Political philosophy; Human rights; Law; Family law; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.0487212535823784,"score_gpt":0.3319946481442398,"score_spread":0.2832733945618614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379209154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123146,0.000958256,8.812229e-7,0.010922046,0.0041493345,0.00053113885,0.000027921991,0.0003314827,0.07076432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98553234,0.001027081,0.000029117367,0.0009479676,0.00049739954,0.0000891728,0.000004035029,0.000013276393,0.01185958],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979655,0.00008460428,0.0002713719,0.00042044514,0.0006545102,0.0006035726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990023,0.00042969806,0.00009817134,0.00012552703,0.00014638851,0.00019796677],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004343198,0.0002337713,0.00037282804,0.000043958793,0.0033199266,0.0001377485,0.00021464986,0.000059875456,0.0000075264015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011136171,0.00017344578,0.000055717694,0.00049213925,0.0003820863,0.00009447043,0.00030477694,0.00020425268,0.000062291365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020274623,0.000097017764,0.071757205,0.00013870593,0.0006742672,0.0001779308,0.22512685,0.00017605028,0.00018442138,0.0053314827,0.6162505,0.07988283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022514872,0.00011322862,0.15528953,0.00030818058,0.000027175553,0.0000011091652,0.2199594,0.000029364179,0.00006736442,0.00006389127,0.6235278,0.00038780333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66127485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80104375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13976893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000707001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017643716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387373508","doi":"10.1007/s10691-023-09536-7","title":"The Anti-trafficking Security Assemblage: Examining Police and NGO Cooperation, Negotiation, and Knowledge Production in Ontario, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Organised crime; Securitization; Public relations; Human security; Political science; Work (physics); Sociology; Public administration; Criminology; Business; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.03313610601843653,"score_gpt":0.31237594918211353,"score_spread":0.279239843163677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387373508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98622674,0.003383568,1.2115402e-7,0.0022618049,0.00085958646,0.00018077441,4.799512e-7,0.00005694956,0.0070300037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946011,0.0018835574,0.0000039120796,0.00003876779,0.00024348318,0.000016671545,0.0000027971512,0.000006302998,0.0032034554],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902153,0.00014001105,0.00018741898,0.00022775678,0.00016731133,0.00025599526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937445,0.0003250316,0.000056489313,0.00007215061,0.00012775375,0.00004411439],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007949373,0.000098956094,0.0001474013,0.000042690855,0.0022501266,0.00017439266,0.00007132102,0.000055478824,0.0000026666405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004200839,0.00007624099,0.000007816865,0.0005010301,0.00028457268,0.00013187311,0.00007132924,0.00018629029,0.0000022173704],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006217596,0.000014775276,0.21753636,0.00001715521,0.000058175858,0.0000053088597,0.7630705,0.000045998855,0.00002203609,0.0011704911,0.016542299,0.0015106524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016225058,0.000025081948,0.253247,0.000082292776,0.00001741408,0.0000029738583,0.44540215,0.00004037639,0.00006431469,0.000079175705,0.30069855,0.00017842864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.936039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31766838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022527871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052786904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390051767","doi":"10.1007/s10691-023-09539-4","title":"Polyamory and Legal Parentage: The Possibilities of C.C. (Re) and BCSC 767 for Expanding Conceptions of Kinship in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Economic Justice; Human sexuality; Daughter; Sociology; Political science; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.1207571353207673,"score_gpt":0.3997569897677116,"score_spread":0.2789998544469443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390051767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99130505,0.001799373,0.000002239084,0.0014238508,0.00019284168,0.0002498631,0.000095103016,0.000009407615,0.0049222405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736553,0.00033974383,0.000017028091,0.000045515877,0.00006241603,0.00004377096,0.0000039548636,0.000003937481,0.0021180979],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915785,0.00010671237,0.0002432464,0.00012434651,0.00018720761,0.00018062668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802536,0.0017252123,0.00008745837,0.00007280957,0.00005444704,0.000034694134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063512113,0.00007034338,0.00019992524,0.000045015582,0.00052226265,0.000025070316,0.00008232371,0.0000283904,0.000010269402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097380875,0.000053733293,0.000022104221,0.00021670327,0.0006215701,0.00008406501,0.00006239028,0.00007573322,2.3435474e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008076826,0.000026371277,0.5799327,0.00027276555,0.00012363777,0.0000081279295,0.23137805,0.000015992991,0.00020166869,0.17736246,0.008845444,0.0017520398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033662427,0.000058049816,0.11327114,0.00006457071,0.00002507972,4.5187363e-7,0.86825246,0.000021964592,0.00008288795,0.0019978648,0.01578375,0.00010516361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6396573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9468215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6368744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008249577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003737479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4016875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399460091","doi":"10.1007/s10691-024-09550-3","title":"Prison Abolition for Collective Freedom: Facilitating Co-Resistance to Binary Colonial Prisons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Human rights; Prison; Public international law; Resistance (ecology); Political science; Law; Political philosophy; Criminology; Sociology; International law; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.0548922403886491,"score_gpt":0.3923639774928079,"score_spread":0.3374717371041588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399460091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81327057,0.01706244,0.0008235208,0.037861392,0.007867065,0.005273461,0.0023177222,0.0010972038,0.11442662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97362554,0.00011763443,0.0015106378,0.00019596009,0.0010968634,0.00072248286,0.000011972593,0.000021228832,0.022697689],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982088,0.00012951951,0.00028837737,0.00046666292,0.0003851577,0.0005214415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981383,0.0013877567,0.00005985412,0.00011336166,0.0001766459,0.00012404588],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063231343,0.00019375359,0.00033432365,0.00010881443,0.00197473,0.00026580135,0.00018566604,0.00009877329,0.000018619217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010591218,0.0001940674,0.0001452364,0.0005787082,0.00046835426,0.00017308393,0.000055565677,0.00015440209,0.000057845435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047581567,0.00013501282,0.00088198733,0.00030944563,0.00037976343,0.000051059313,0.6312996,0.000017840943,0.00031551003,0.069865465,0.2949292,0.0013392684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031094882,0.00033954385,0.0015740303,0.00015547306,0.00006715422,7.344978e-7,0.033501424,0.000028476134,0.00023865905,0.002210086,0.961309,0.00026446316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008055157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011991964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6663798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007152518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005859463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400007803","doi":"10.1007/s10691-024-09554-z","title":"Correction: Prison Abolition for Collective Freedom: Facilitating Co-Resistance to Binary Colonial Prisons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"African history and culture studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Human rights; Colonialism; Public international law; Political science; Resistance (ecology); Law; Political philosophy; Criminology; Sociology; International law; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.039688702303882065,"score_gpt":0.3566439045809107,"score_spread":0.31695520227702867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400007803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033522714,0.033141546,0.0018696196,0.015268343,0.021390235,0.0039117127,0.0009949597,0.0012918672,0.888609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8156743,0.000121086836,0.0012872051,0.00019446542,0.001531702,0.0011121102,0.000008664979,0.0000197887,0.18005069],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984536,0.00012752664,0.00025649474,0.00044103994,0.00032024144,0.0004010987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848914,0.00097671,0.0000674955,0.00008888473,0.00028365373,0.000094115596],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005047798,0.00019184478,0.00033121667,0.00007590348,0.0037194127,0.00012451936,0.00013762192,0.00007933373,0.000026361917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014313195,0.00017915365,0.00013316347,0.0006081326,0.00067385606,0.00016704059,0.000048537975,0.00016557859,0.00006281075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001574199,0.000037226215,0.00014735389,0.00007831258,0.00017164364,0.000009390319,0.29796463,0.000007993229,0.000069091504,0.027277855,0.67362094,0.00045812523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121893536,0.00025228673,0.0002986679,0.00013079905,0.000052693762,6.930985e-7,0.14406247,0.000011060817,0.000048392063,0.0005590032,0.8542604,0.00020162712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018238071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7821516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010250687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035774548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411716400","doi":"10.1007/s10691-025-09576-1","title":"Fieldwork, Ethics, and the Importance of ‘Wide Reflexivity’: Feminist Socio-legal Research in Difficult Sites","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Reflexivity; Political philosophy; Public international law; Philosophy of medicine; Human rights; Sociology; Ontology; Political science; Social philosophy; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Epistemology; International law; Politics; Social change; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.42342489457896537,"score_gpt":0.6135878598124862,"score_spread":0.19016296523352083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411716400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16660583,0.02171417,0.000068572226,0.45477048,0.0003934969,0.00096197287,0.000034052227,0.000050255672,0.3554012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817972,0.0061683063,0.0008358695,0.0015363207,0.0001377461,0.00009703121,0.0000014104667,0.00000826506,0.009417861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98891705,0.008359397,0.0005396983,0.00041198844,0.0011279421,0.0006438986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94692945,0.051859625,0.0001300431,0.00027379618,0.0007295944,0.00007748079],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.047407895,0.00015742864,0.0005368212,0.0001405967,0.0023625593,0.00017959395,0.00047365297,0.00026978416,0.000012927828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054653004,0.00010708497,0.00009352395,0.0012213015,0.0153880445,0.00011551067,0.00052013755,0.0024707932,0.0000034970549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001955302,0.00005767866,0.040629584,0.00023844658,0.00009192214,0.000014789875,0.13802768,4.1457866e-7,0.000022906577,0.811843,0.007983429,0.00089464424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009309231,0.00011174679,0.0076655885,0.00047221637,0.000021027683,5.265527e-7,0.5088888,0.00000853466,0.00012783922,0.18434584,0.29723197,0.00019502078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004600208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02133896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8151914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017522191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077701005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}