{"meta":{"query_hash":"00046fd87a5c","filters":{"venue":"Fordham law review"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/00046fd87a5c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Fordham+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W146107859","doi":"","title":"A Tale of Two Countries: Canada's Response to the Peer-to-Peer Crisis and What it Means for the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Political science; Peer-to-peer; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.023530454527768477,"score_gpt":0.33227623796141026,"score_spread":0.3087457834336418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W146107859","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004416267,0.027225034,0.00006953414,0.9656585,0.00010173739,0.0012329386,0.00092289393,0.0000070528026,0.00036604187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08383934,0.10971792,0.00029170845,0.78272194,0.0004535412,0.00039073612,0.000022536733,0.000032106393,0.022530196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986771,0.00016991285,0.00022274841,0.00014102444,0.0004907697,0.0002984816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981794,0.00096832274,0.00009332968,0.00027354737,0.000314924,0.00017049776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023111114,0.000095221636,0.00020368317,0.000018680434,0.00048501158,0.00012782069,0.00034725206,0.000022132013,0.00011477153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012266306,0.000059160648,0.000055696393,0.0004283114,0.0001373209,0.00016539033,0.000031759737,0.000058419115,0.000008189121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037594575,0.0000036607337,0.000004374241,0.00010421212,0.000016227452,6.601614e-7,0.0056679742,0.000053771342,2.82236e-7,0.03402944,0.95655805,0.003523731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009994823,0.000027928358,0.00004206041,0.00048969703,0.000043150285,0.0000010781781,0.001999936,0.000016671747,0.00000919478,0.00017236278,0.9970111,0.00008682684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94746315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99699044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18293658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016411455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005186316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3730366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493863039","doi":"","title":"Loving Gender Balance: Reframing Identity-Based Inequality Remedies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Sociology; Supreme court; Identity (music); Inequality; Gender studies; Scholarship; Nationality; Political science; Law; Immigration; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08220999882219028,"score_gpt":0.28273004879346886,"score_spread":0.2005200499712786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493863039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4910232,0.14278413,0.012420467,0.0043939413,0.0039241104,0.0042320485,0.000028514984,0.0023902317,0.33880335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640885,0.0042210957,0.00087367947,0.027783385,0.002086676,0.0000667863,0.00017493873,0.0000683116,0.0006366382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982444,0.000028160734,0.0005522804,0.00037219652,0.00044216387,0.00036076986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998844,0.000035100817,0.0003694689,0.0004992825,0.00022877115,0.00002335971],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071672816,0.00025509828,0.0005097306,0.00007146823,0.0005897024,0.00015168764,0.00035007155,0.0000620666,0.0010630533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048962447,0.000208343,0.00019788292,0.00038434207,0.00013128223,0.0016606955,0.00015001453,0.0001843465,0.00087402604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009920483,0.000082033206,0.0060877814,0.011874772,0.000029876002,0.00011403607,0.0000193605,0.0000038934613,0.00003530609,0.9646957,0.01606132,0.0009860209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030147602,0.0000067803153,0.002494624,0.0020600064,0.00011298655,0.000008350242,0.00000556458,0.00015460025,0.00001760455,0.050676815,0.94374627,0.00041493654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030901708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004328183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92768496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003959499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003426465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512866983","doi":"","title":"Foreign Official Immunity and the 'Baseline' Problem","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Doctrine; Law; Personal jurisdiction; Political science; Universal jurisdiction; State (computer science); Common law; State immunity; Customary international law; Qualified immunity; International law; Sovereign immunity; Public international law; Constitution","score_opus":0.05194192873920622,"score_gpt":0.304862104085157,"score_spread":0.2529201753459508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512866983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012125468,0.050850946,0.00028979545,0.0026438488,0.00013476002,0.0012969435,0.0000049477667,0.000085308886,0.9434809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7547436,0.23350085,0.0012534922,0.0076653175,0.000646531,0.00022049485,0.000012003369,0.000027454123,0.0019302693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989307,0.00038109245,0.00022789021,0.00011115887,0.00017065418,0.0001785384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948245,0.00009773068,0.00009912554,0.00018009101,0.00007941865,0.00006119863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027549535,0.00008008366,0.00020979544,0.000008796736,0.000673057,0.000030844385,0.00018030182,0.000044127064,0.00060594076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010122619,0.000049733037,0.000098514574,0.00013272178,0.00047084276,0.00012482208,0.000048400438,0.000112223555,0.000032391472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144726255,0.000019668008,0.000037398808,0.00014372497,0.000008956205,6.1375886e-7,0.0015418843,1.2278967e-8,3.3528153e-7,0.96234363,0.00077569403,0.035113603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002284405,0.00002687268,0.000106729305,0.00039124172,0.00006053707,0.000002058001,0.00015225021,0.000004426283,0.0000035521612,0.018551564,0.98039716,0.00007514143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011877014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039514774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97962147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001397757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051927353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604575688","doi":"","title":"THE PARADOXES OF PRO BONO","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; American exceptionalism; Supreme court; Representation (politics); Legal education; Exceptionalism; Immigration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.025426273112143242,"score_gpt":0.3487777984498652,"score_spread":0.32335152533772193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604575688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008669565,0.02404593,0.00002305529,0.008560845,0.00041319532,0.0003844603,0.000013464162,0.000025366513,0.9656667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9598342,0.03209898,0.00056006166,0.003016521,0.00033968448,0.00004540047,0.000003258818,0.0000058709215,0.0040960046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935466,0.00006658505,0.00016969156,0.000064788015,0.00017847835,0.00016580877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993836,0.00021286517,0.00009219041,0.00016763806,0.000082363564,0.00006129958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005987072,0.00004713249,0.00013141267,0.0000032859768,0.00045271032,0.000015227985,0.00022058983,0.000026378491,0.00019748657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002659717,0.000029080738,0.000077837416,0.000093355,0.0014348024,0.000053771902,0.000018584424,0.000095292875,0.000042212498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.4586767e-7,0.000006586136,0.00007852219,0.000066942746,0.000003854421,2.7418133e-7,0.000022531953,1.5321604e-8,0.000003682832,0.9923829,0.0029135956,0.00452068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015992973,0.000008128369,0.000027956918,0.00013218223,0.000014406558,0.0000013862685,0.00002093744,1.4161485e-7,0.000011214722,0.0061419094,0.99358493,0.000040823823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016725974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025236863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99067134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007065085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042319475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5286589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1867839040","doi":"","title":"The Preservation Obligation: Regulating and Sanctioning Pre-Litigation Spoliation in Federal Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Sanctions; Law; Obligation; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Political science; Summary judgment; Pension; Misconduct; Civil procedure; Supreme court","score_opus":0.0541456604935297,"score_gpt":0.32113545725217446,"score_spread":0.26698979675864476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1867839040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27523446,0.11618554,0.0016108461,0.020420829,0.0015154518,0.005661617,0.000005178116,0.00034227918,0.5790238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922109,0.0065672076,0.00017948815,0.00035632853,0.00023952281,0.00008104728,0.000005718301,0.000006128136,0.00035362007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989834,0.00017703362,0.0003230328,0.00013134521,0.00022571553,0.00015949795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994622,0.000079893296,0.00020524928,0.0000872582,0.00012746839,0.000037936545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001535986,0.00006329158,0.0001242956,0.00001354662,0.0010068195,0.00012146151,0.00008118334,0.000048869733,0.000029608487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036574653,0.000049303027,0.000025082689,0.00026259897,0.00009890999,0.00088740996,0.000017744018,0.000072916606,0.0000041619905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007407794,0.000011225821,0.01792337,0.0005523733,0.000005964164,2.8182225e-7,0.004759778,0.000002227981,0.0000063966972,0.9568833,0.0004976984,0.019349981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034287115,0.00007034854,0.10359623,0.006188187,0.000029456816,0.0000029282492,0.0012258334,0.00028367274,0.000085489075,0.1285368,0.7593337,0.0003044616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022350768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021650162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8283465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006353315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006170689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341768213","doi":"","title":"Registered Savings Plans and the Making of Middle Class Canada: Toward a Performative Theory of Tax Policy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Middle class; Performative utterance; Incentive; Salience (neuroscience); Tax reform; Tax policy; Politics; Tax avoidance; Economics; Public economics; Political science; Political economy; Market economy; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.053264056908642374,"score_gpt":0.2976925660136262,"score_spread":0.24442850910498382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341768213","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022189016,0.12071651,0.00017653813,0.4480267,0.00031221393,0.0029655239,0.0042716204,0.00003324353,0.40130866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717127,0.015009678,0.00002059159,0.010837484,0.000080202415,0.000016865804,5.204159e-7,0.0000059331774,0.0023159983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989104,0.00029036257,0.0002840817,0.00009390476,0.00021591554,0.00020529803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900186,0.00032743174,0.00037178537,0.00019463383,0.000058095713,0.00004619596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011539535,0.00007655237,0.00030940323,0.000013864656,0.00016010531,0.0000075675875,0.00024039515,0.0000312504,0.0000487134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009803743,0.000042048327,0.00007064623,0.00015294908,0.00079755305,0.00010761284,0.000037570226,0.000058360365,0.0000010505681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017969393,0.0000024016413,0.000042132695,0.0006826411,0.000015695388,6.9800507e-7,0.0044199345,1.9684434e-8,0.0000021316341,0.9713855,0.013684196,0.009746689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026957793,0.000013655761,0.00039532344,0.0042655924,0.000027039301,0.000003403255,0.00038080825,4.3926985e-7,0.00001755612,0.007396082,0.9871598,0.00007075334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8740808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9543572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9734756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013852434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008055987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29386175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121630146","doi":"","title":"Outsourcing Immigration Compliance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; Deportation; Government (linguistics); Outsourcing; Nationality; Political science; Population; Compliance (psychology); Immigration policy; Business; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.13549682635262542,"score_gpt":0.4655588366139104,"score_spread":0.330062010261285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121630146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044143293,0.31868598,0.00219566,0.1296682,0.0012345962,0.0043275077,0.000021361277,0.00068924326,0.5387631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7357366,0.112464026,0.0008493904,0.13583283,0.00092692894,0.00034412133,0.000098857,0.000041843265,0.013705381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988375,0.00013883795,0.00042221995,0.00016570477,0.00013420665,0.0003015748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993897,0.00006975908,0.0001590607,0.00023304771,0.000096966796,0.00005148026],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003937744,0.00012220323,0.00033733554,0.000012593183,0.0006977157,0.0000041081435,0.00010552581,0.00004594431,0.00034486616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045546396,0.00009270455,0.00008517104,0.0001281909,0.000020466254,0.00010497058,0.00003201851,0.00020092283,0.0007998658],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016000859,0.000089464134,0.011813449,0.008279093,0.000044583216,0.00000741418,0.001026859,9.050315e-7,0.00007468451,0.54011196,0.3461114,0.09242422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015885329,0.000053889184,0.0075034155,0.009104931,0.000034511355,7.0609264e-7,0.000047886933,0.0000058872392,0.0000037009886,0.002348217,0.9806182,0.00011984145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011265829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001777105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7313223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000436764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018223822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122171275","doi":"","title":"“Natural Born” Disputes in the 2016 Presidential Election","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Presidential system; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Presidential election; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.015105933032825125,"score_gpt":0.3169053765679362,"score_spread":0.30179944353511107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122171275","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00959298,0.5416978,0.0003856738,0.08706914,0.003200443,0.0038509474,0.000014778944,0.0002513659,0.35393688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544837,0.04112944,0.000009324731,0.00160808,0.0007675614,0.0000740808,0.0000012512492,0.000006553442,0.0019199983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875325,0.00029990057,0.00023519456,0.00015145163,0.00031274377,0.00024747837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995278,0.00014543458,0.0000947027,0.00013486,0.00006201965,0.00003516069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011312884,0.000078546,0.00017763964,0.000014003791,0.00029448216,0.00006701153,0.00028958797,0.00004314887,0.00016946677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031426406,0.000036240508,0.00007927073,0.00027994846,0.00012508122,0.00043387525,0.000020655973,0.00007489434,0.00013301715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010393594,0.00006013163,0.000750286,0.0008564473,0.000017376013,0.000008630008,0.001173424,3.4453837e-8,0.00013178764,0.8060776,0.09676319,0.094150685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008406537,0.000017562252,0.000662114,0.0019937197,0.000014587801,0.0000018103682,0.00003727345,1.2900603e-7,0.000024429866,0.0054506348,0.99163544,0.00007825861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020119736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032852538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94489074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046893078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000942229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122367334","doi":"","title":"The New Constitution and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Law; Constitutionalism; Human rights; Constitution; Democracy","score_opus":0.017601125761629022,"score_gpt":0.292893257251816,"score_spread":0.27529213149018694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122367334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002399348,0.4100663,0.00068940327,0.045266215,0.000330801,0.0007901968,0.000007448469,0.000030000938,0.54257965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83461547,0.16150792,0.00004547202,0.00242324,0.0006134269,0.000023711258,0.000005595345,0.000002821185,0.0007623523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919987,0.00013330091,0.00023191002,0.00007324533,0.00022141071,0.00014028975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945027,0.00021975348,0.000116656935,0.000078391146,0.00010753521,0.000027377982],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065442896,0.000058723796,0.00016783037,0.0000062166855,0.0014004059,0.000030502395,0.0001089697,0.000024221908,0.00001643213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027294335,0.000031108444,0.00006123274,0.0002007935,0.0023917921,0.00006350349,0.000029804607,0.00004492969,0.000006417164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025742638,0.00000409264,0.00012000629,0.000029876837,0.000008143571,1.7616087e-7,0.000056448087,8.364359e-7,3.6661453e-7,0.9899053,0.007431523,0.0024406705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009756926,0.0000028644622,0.00013493444,0.00028779934,0.000047128153,7.190589e-7,0.00005074725,6.936963e-7,0.0000024159049,0.32337314,0.6759724,0.000029624985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028175721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024080202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8343755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002411092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018582762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125849290","doi":"","title":"Defining “Accidents” in the Air: Why Tort Law Principles Are Essential to Interpret the Montreal Convention’s “Accident” Requirement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Accident (philosophy); Convention; Political science; Liability; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028175342325582862,"score_gpt":0.33468242059449,"score_spread":0.3065070782689071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125849290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036868043,0.02365222,0.001945046,0.36967078,0.0033158422,0.0064308667,0.00008405001,0.00023062069,0.55780256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780721,0.004113414,0.00004844882,0.01612998,0.00027420063,0.00025909438,0.000012791081,0.000011134333,0.0010788485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979164,0.00042533985,0.0004671675,0.00023968972,0.00067333673,0.00027809094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902666,0.00024098843,0.00018169709,0.0003564719,0.00013804872,0.00005612322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001992668,0.00012765251,0.00020076113,0.000022155187,0.00044362867,0.000109619796,0.0008557266,0.000044847897,0.00039280683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040403532,0.000065159555,0.00016880139,0.00016033908,0.000111336296,0.00037810666,0.0001455766,0.00008412219,0.00023250436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007485745,0.000031758223,0.0018819551,0.000036068694,0.000015531528,0.000004401476,0.0006736001,0.0000012989009,0.0000037532723,0.9889042,0.0062526967,0.0021872525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017479647,0.00002943258,0.00470232,0.0031270846,0.0000376459,0.0000027914125,0.00023815791,0.0000013374091,0.000040418465,0.011694584,0.979826,0.00012547497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016258325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24947654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001960755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005168301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}