{"meta":{"query_hash":"d92b793be9cf","filters":{"venue":"Forest Policy and Economics"},"cohort_total":106,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":106,"exported":106,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d92b793be9cf","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Forest+Policy+and+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W1126774089","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2015.08.004","title":"Exploring public perceptions of forest adaptation strategies in Western Canada: Implications for policy-makers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Australian Government; Alberta Environment and Parks; Forest Genetics Council of British Columbia","keywords":"Reforestation; Forest management; Adaptation (eye); Environmental resource management; Climate change; Residence; Perception; Geography; Environmental planning; Business; Ecology; Forestry; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.3422545315957989,"score_gpt":0.2699821508559473,"score_spread":0.0722723807398516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1126774089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892908,0.00008351806,0.0025103977,0.004751857,0.00009967024,0.00028595293,0.00044845464,0.00000954928,0.0025198536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821913,0.00044679324,0.0004814763,0.00018757806,0.00018896729,0.0001959489,0.00013962515,0.0000226305,0.00011785214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883586,0.000008050292,0.00059996115,0.00026199184,0.000011814422,0.00028232636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930346,0.00006339115,0.00027358916,0.00020116451,0.000016139473,0.00014228243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002898577,0.00013119333,0.00028076643,0.0003407685,0.00007563067,0.00006280999,0.00012526692,0.00006240455,0.00000535718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010982014,0.00017481002,0.000049575774,0.00011085996,0.0000867439,0.0009169735,0.000045448276,0.00005692899,0.000012470713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058948162,0.000018019686,0.48632792,0.000011350756,0.000011308694,2.3951854e-8,0.00054961984,0.025978683,5.8763305e-7,0.48664942,0.00004585886,0.00040130055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067315315,0.000053990847,0.8562325,0.000005259679,0.0000033521706,0.0000023130874,0.001795504,0.0069606914,0.0000012989128,0.12912206,0.0049823863,0.00016748656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28942382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7295091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44008526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088521314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055767427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71530795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971493088","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2007.10.006","title":"What factors influence obtaining forest certification in the U.S. Pacific Northwest?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Certified wood; Certification; Forest industry; Business; Forest management; Abundance (ecology); Environmental resource management; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.017333091546143625,"score_gpt":0.23937761535132104,"score_spread":0.22204452380517742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971493088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98613995,0.00001961797,0.000008806614,0.0010325827,0.00008894482,0.00020526338,0.0000038322255,0.00001730299,0.0124837095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983002,0.00036861913,0.00003299365,0.00066827564,0.00011551283,0.000010960605,0.00003075914,0.00001179563,0.0004608652],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899846,0.000019461311,0.0002717876,0.00024061203,0.00006610757,0.0004035937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940675,0.0001296046,0.000098263255,0.00028144813,0.0000025418683,0.00008137916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005045684,0.00014735374,0.0001077421,0.0001227159,0.00017442374,0.00021867774,0.00029024473,0.000068853995,0.00005683577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047193756,0.00011699057,0.0000357037,0.00023762346,0.00021898624,0.0010178883,0.000109765366,0.000113937895,0.00023373743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011108064,0.000019048126,0.96458256,0.000004860709,0.000003135689,0.0000013275677,0.0037315295,0.008193922,0.0000031604707,0.020051628,0.00020957163,0.0031881696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013998244,0.000030301124,0.9429913,0.0000071460095,0.0000040619325,0.0000028728189,0.00084522885,0.0013173422,0.000006956176,0.0057408325,0.048771054,0.00014289915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007882265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045899898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048561484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001286912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011051023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978366781","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2014.07.004","title":"Time-based combinatorial auction for timber allocation and delivery coordination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre de Géomatique du Québec; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Combinatorial auction; Revenue; Computer science; Business; Operations research; Environmental economics; Order (exchange); Procurement; Generalized second-price auction; Bidding; Auction theory; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03409492670318772,"score_gpt":0.30756101420866677,"score_spread":0.27346608750547907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978366781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9451305,0.0000061644196,0.049393605,0.0036584602,0.00021784671,0.00023427648,0.000026563059,0.000026130683,0.0013063963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975593,0.0000062155736,0.00044415344,0.00033919362,0.00049198297,0.000044304477,0.000034440298,0.000007232329,0.0010731688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932855,0.000042345477,0.00024442092,0.00023001993,0.000050606475,0.00010407505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988777,0.0006503945,0.00014926192,0.00016565487,0.00008840121,0.000068604015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009019273,0.00007381116,0.0001160109,0.00013785438,0.0002744421,0.00012563498,0.000089295514,0.000073109695,0.000023614459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051085703,0.00007000978,0.00003316051,0.00009279809,0.0001255639,0.0002670458,0.000023532079,0.000033430708,0.00007558692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007354134,0.000027812732,0.00067469815,0.000004254131,0.0000061335318,6.65169e-9,0.000083757266,0.008816238,0.000046707828,0.9709712,0.0025324184,0.016763225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063250895,0.0000693311,0.0026682133,0.0000019642816,0.000008408182,0.000001998772,0.000031770705,0.3003423,0.00019122315,0.5765342,0.11942761,0.0000904564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003015693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002729613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.394437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003252514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004120457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28549162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981208806","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2013.08.003","title":"International developments in the administration of publicly-funded forest research: A review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Competition (biology); Administration (probate law); Corporate governance; Public administration; Public policy; Political science; Environmental resource management; Public relations; Economic growth; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.19276653396601834,"score_gpt":0.38855672062008895,"score_spread":0.1957901866540706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981208806","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018043187,0.6913656,0.0000011270681,0.0022637008,0.00020819092,0.0027470707,0.00006916954,0.000014036318,0.30152678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00072061934,0.9957894,0.00010072436,0.00036452743,0.00018113496,0.00029282202,0.00019698631,0.000019382633,0.00233442],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831533,0.00015223245,0.00068762735,0.00031829765,0.00017220377,0.0003543047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990365,0.00019426776,0.00031943546,0.00036549722,0.000010411372,0.00007389622],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012646758,0.00022765984,0.00052898476,0.00028302328,0.000083237224,0.00012666303,0.0008891562,0.00013501456,0.0005371708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021663024,0.00016421004,0.00011807162,0.000409957,0.00026664973,0.00035279393,0.00047395655,0.00027024743,0.0008064155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010952311,0.00012660447,0.0036942998,0.007844672,0.0000813142,0.000004004069,0.00025101335,0.000014550668,7.221455e-9,0.086848676,0.056489643,0.8446343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090714304,0.000036414865,0.0012653711,0.0018156037,0.000025271363,0.000012252115,0.000006583019,0.000034831843,2.046322e-8,0.0019329686,0.9946315,0.00014843815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028164154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005124566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9381419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026010696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011599111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982970900","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.008","title":"Illegal logging in Cameroon: Causes and the path forward","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Logging; Illegal logging; Language change; Government (linguistics); Business; Poverty; Economic growth; Economics; Forestry; Geography","score_opus":0.006533102248081712,"score_gpt":0.18574208216337096,"score_spread":0.17920897991528925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982970900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897716,0.0000129906275,0.0000040051054,0.0030608398,0.000050382005,0.00009941406,0.0000051648763,0.000005923826,0.0069896653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982796,0.00018800658,0.000045519326,0.0009821578,0.00006338825,0.0000033460767,0.0000016852752,0.000002730402,0.00043360554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996381,0.0000093962535,0.00008156697,0.000120942015,0.000021244534,0.0001287543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979115,0.00003859362,0.00003132948,0.000097149205,8.5788895e-7,0.00004093505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016416119,0.000059391732,0.0000716347,0.000030046755,0.00015562732,0.00004564366,0.00008072075,0.000030449062,0.00005086312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020121384,0.00004382098,0.000016354506,0.00003177393,0.00034369438,0.00008373091,0.00022951975,0.00007185403,0.000020601921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001551279,0.0000068721065,0.99232876,0.0000038973344,0.0000043327714,7.300511e-7,0.0010205526,0.00031700934,0.0000037393083,0.003937024,0.00017694323,0.0021846506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005549107,0.000009225241,0.9025386,0.0000015320946,0.0000056746594,0.00000400821,0.00033774794,0.003498416,0.000003419198,0.0030985074,0.08987587,0.000072099276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009203594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02398117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08979014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024940655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054417383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985490163","doi":"10.1016/s1389-9341(01)00038-7","title":"Privileging the sub-sector: critical sub-sectors and sectoral relationships in forest policy-making","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University; Vancouver Island University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Policy analysis; Sectoral analysis; Regional science; Economics; Unit (ring theory); Economic sector; Regional policy; Environmental policy; Economic system; Political science; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Economy; Public administration; Macroeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.047982712367799225,"score_gpt":0.2683915100444378,"score_spread":0.22040879767663857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985490163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984536,0.000091337046,0.000022865457,0.004478886,0.00010361252,0.00016339718,0.000008801642,0.00005477061,0.010540339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950169,0.00012752034,0.000012233495,0.002368343,0.0023973775,0.00002252102,0.000014174086,0.000020596262,0.000020378322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986711,0.000020954438,0.00034592263,0.00028896696,0.00005933701,0.0006137275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993166,0.0003196304,0.000105760155,0.00017970202,0.00003269585,0.000045653866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032050698,0.0002234734,0.00022400475,0.00031901052,0.00041869615,0.00068980036,0.00017235625,0.00012437743,0.000010194265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045773355,0.00017615575,0.00005094218,0.00035425185,0.00032390386,0.0014022999,0.00016531916,0.00029223287,0.000031814834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016615253,0.000012083954,0.41692674,0.00003258234,0.000005895651,0.000004741924,0.000053356114,0.0004249108,0.000011845611,0.58212173,0.00004291347,0.00034658457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002380385,0.000012792439,0.65219605,0.0000493897,0.000015501802,0.00002497953,0.00023151712,0.009686268,0.000006389092,0.3293307,0.0079477895,0.0002605984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007145809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034796394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25279102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008708512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008960746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990890161","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2007.12.002","title":"A marginal cost analysis of trade-offs in old-growth preservation in Ontario","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Time horizon; Maximization; Marginal cost; Opportunity cost; Profit (economics); Economics; Volume (thermodynamics); Forest management; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.020925520914015554,"score_gpt":0.21696286993043143,"score_spread":0.19603734901641587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990890161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97649,0.0000035298076,0.0000032572473,0.00055130885,0.00001257158,0.00014365517,0.000008773457,0.000004047527,0.022782817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971511,0.00010647645,0.000086195425,0.00032966567,0.000019777128,0.000013520353,0.000030311605,0.0000054378015,0.00225755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929506,0.000014478225,0.00025970757,0.00017469656,0.000042342264,0.00021369087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970895,0.000027916623,0.00007740105,0.00013326661,0.0000013195404,0.00005116237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012670648,0.00009225073,0.00019953829,0.00037149544,0.000034016193,0.000010528214,0.00012777964,0.000051191324,0.00039134538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020378448,0.00009940658,0.00004810204,0.00045122753,0.00012624684,0.00033881277,0.000089019784,0.00007921984,0.000027573054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002789816,0.00004426934,0.96194756,0.0000042444312,0.000022768698,0.0000019361753,0.0014909402,0.024104228,0.0000018926368,0.0118644005,0.00036310588,0.0001267744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037592818,0.000030007215,0.97017604,0.0000030870406,0.000020273195,0.0000011832113,0.0000078148805,0.02193846,0.0000043457617,0.0019073203,0.0054425118,0.00009303197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5203083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.865337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3450287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003055111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027434346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48288596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991557933","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.012","title":"Pushing the boundaries of conventional forest policy research: Analyzing institutional change at multiple levels","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Institutionalism; Order (exchange); Common-pool resource; Collective action; Action (physics); New institutionalism; Climate change; Economic system; Political science; Environmental resource management; Economics; Ecology; Microeconomics; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.18656840732234076,"score_gpt":0.3080932757592276,"score_spread":0.12152486843688687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991557933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634831,0.000048566926,0.000025934074,0.0018284593,0.000095618656,0.00027894016,0.00009799348,0.000015523292,0.03412589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689466,0.0001294698,0.00018556391,0.00043655362,0.0005469495,0.00004367418,0.00002864754,0.000014841013,0.0017196292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987716,0.000054838067,0.00029881072,0.00025460112,0.00013772592,0.00048242311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932545,0.00012534643,0.00013531023,0.00027491688,0.000013492677,0.00012547642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006611977,0.0001499456,0.00016121098,0.00023709107,0.001055621,0.000109690314,0.00037225557,0.00007623192,0.00061815395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021581745,0.00012431054,0.000084168074,0.00027916965,0.002318073,0.00058809714,0.0008182685,0.000146629,0.00029353498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005004616,0.00003529162,0.48639196,0.000019097859,0.00003065912,0.0000010691067,0.0022987975,0.00045099744,0.000007929264,0.5082786,0.0016073178,0.00082821865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005218917,0.0000661076,0.7426946,0.00001588042,0.000010846861,0.000010784271,0.00005312671,0.004123953,0.000052540705,0.045944314,0.20633832,0.00016763569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041419514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043006416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46233428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003052426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009903221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97445625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993614728","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2009.07.007","title":"Negotiation-based distributed wood procurement planning within a multi-firm environment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Polytechnique Montréal; Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Procurement; Profitability index; Forester; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Business; Industrial organization; Production (economics); Task (project management); Operations management; Process management; Environmental economics; Economics; Marketing; Microeconomics; Finance; Management; Forestry","score_opus":0.08139430910925681,"score_gpt":0.34168058543841345,"score_spread":0.26028627632915663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993614728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8797527,0.00003485961,0.11336282,0.005777662,0.000059951748,0.00029230586,0.000122057405,0.00003988634,0.00055777596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969591,0.0000055647542,0.0017541022,0.0008014292,0.00013130203,0.000025788791,0.000043755674,0.000005151257,0.00027379734],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989824,0.000029782355,0.00041410024,0.0003006248,0.000096375035,0.00017668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919266,0.00013635524,0.00024021901,0.00028775688,0.000017211936,0.00012579108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005234672,0.00011288088,0.00014263259,0.000118654905,0.00028270466,0.00014234017,0.00020247453,0.00005855302,0.000056535187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022250492,0.00009809273,0.000047198246,0.00012085282,0.00007263259,0.00017944974,0.000028531142,0.00007497289,0.00012746107],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009579745,0.00033667975,0.026012497,0.00000401809,0.000023693181,0.0000012237326,0.0018508959,0.5885284,0.0000759807,0.3738328,0.0010194074,0.008218613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018677774,0.00025896373,0.19266686,0.000017672353,0.000024456878,0.000014295014,0.0009682557,0.26934394,0.0008889309,0.4468859,0.08654314,0.0005197967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001462074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017314424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31918445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008090024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006957025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40001053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993842882","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2006.05.008","title":"Forest environmental incomes and the rural poor","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":542,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; World Bank Group","keywords":"Poverty; Diversification (marketing strategy); Economics; Household income; Income distribution; Population; Distribution (mathematics); Socioeconomics; Net national income; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economic growth; Business; Gross income; Public economics; Inequality","score_opus":0.020197394489281904,"score_gpt":0.17760784020171128,"score_spread":0.15741044571242938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993842882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98573405,0.0011017598,0.00013800363,0.0025642766,0.00010608758,0.00021546548,0.00014515266,0.000014332253,0.009980875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587864,0.0013868331,0.00011648184,0.000936107,0.00037015745,0.00003266962,0.000065621585,0.00002360369,0.0011898656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989862,0.000011329368,0.0004633055,0.0002621052,0.000011410674,0.00026565738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994457,0.000076564516,0.00021980186,0.00019077788,8.402719e-7,0.000066326495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032310592,0.00017053573,0.00029980938,0.00010256663,0.00022507456,0.00009988494,0.000119835495,0.00008730554,0.000064077445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001526729,0.0001598913,0.00007674634,0.00002659782,0.0004510587,0.00030493928,0.00013132113,0.00008795303,0.000254192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017459293,0.00001480277,0.49284557,0.0000036159352,0.000015177767,1.3802261e-7,0.00008246845,0.0008525368,8.6065256e-7,0.5056344,0.00012919171,0.00040377112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014314333,0.000028349195,0.67466575,0.000002154876,0.0000074768814,0.000016196454,0.00010848414,0.01848508,0.0000050686112,0.28760946,0.017443135,0.00019741138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003547969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008813706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21802495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013847175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007678523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6520178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994361174","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.013","title":"Pluralism in the economics of sustainable forest management","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Sustainable forest management; Forest management; Stakeholder; Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Economics; Management science; Business; Forestry; Ecology; Geography; Epistemology; Management","score_opus":0.005400796230654458,"score_gpt":0.19586948653303943,"score_spread":0.19046869030238497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994361174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79706603,0.000013778822,0.0000036609804,0.0011198217,0.000023276953,0.00026619254,0.000005985892,0.0000071382915,0.20149414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887869,0.00024120855,0.0001314063,0.0005913965,0.00013216875,0.000031719785,0.000017979539,0.000012561595,0.01005466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990596,0.000018200788,0.00029171802,0.00019939117,0.000036056706,0.00039500938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995386,0.000039714923,0.000105484825,0.00027854243,0.0000019437605,0.000035724603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002751232,0.00013725896,0.00014710949,0.00013430418,0.00009296203,0.000062101164,0.00032080355,0.000049892584,0.00010936344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000064795017,0.00011636369,0.00004987499,0.00014895755,0.00021369275,0.0002804212,0.00026602315,0.000060896084,0.00011277458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012803405,0.000037463906,0.1320763,0.000020856787,0.000006618379,0.000003921433,0.00025516987,0.051664654,2.6640993e-7,0.81038177,0.00508603,0.00045417558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006790705,0.0000629874,0.4573161,0.000005549499,0.000015829492,0.000005792577,0.0003307215,0.0058678905,0.0000048113507,0.17934345,0.35613942,0.00022838937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020750077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116275055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6310383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013677678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008633466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9857708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000579138","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2010.12.001","title":"Social acceptability of alternative forest regimes in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania, using stakeholder attitudes as metrics of uncertainty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Mount; Stakeholder; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Business; Socioeconomics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08353914426400243,"score_gpt":0.26875499641775563,"score_spread":0.1852158521537532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000579138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930271,0.000012144743,0.00002209338,0.0000761632,0.000026595602,0.00016585673,0.000030855972,0.0000043232553,0.006634848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947846,0.000060656035,0.0002802525,0.00007590906,0.000029154939,0.0000018403115,0.0000043564737,0.0000048969523,0.00006449207],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992703,0.000027336837,0.00026086642,0.00020103512,0.000069142785,0.00017132174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999574,0.000040128587,0.00019686794,0.00013564565,0.000010835454,0.00004249816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002403582,0.000102145925,0.0001908962,0.00012847804,0.00008719392,0.0000114342165,0.00018458796,0.00005644773,0.00022768564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004638571,0.00010144024,0.000051627216,0.00017434644,0.00040653453,0.00016244147,0.00031758,0.000051370967,0.0000047363183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004694853,0.00010799481,0.9837088,0.000028402506,0.000023616538,5.4139593e-7,0.004372572,0.006396698,0.000007279763,0.004483419,0.000011466374,0.0008122824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034870766,0.000050387673,0.9876809,0.0000035796147,0.00001633832,5.4995786e-7,0.0010271271,0.0034718507,0.00009081973,0.006633656,0.00057486526,0.000101197256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09043097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012280134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07815084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003090889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023220071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91562593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002304400","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2013.11.003","title":"Global impacts of Russian log export restrictions and the Canada–U.S. lumber dispute: Modeling trade in logs and lumber","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economic rent; Agricultural economics; Product (mathematics); Liberalization; International trade; Wood industry; Welfare; Business; Economics; Forestry; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007198098415275505,"score_gpt":0.20382372216007244,"score_spread":0.19662562374479695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002304400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778599,0.000045377426,0.000007765913,0.003611981,0.00003153313,0.00020677387,0.000021088577,0.0000047142403,0.018210879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848104,0.00052391813,0.000061033214,0.00064745295,0.000055671848,0.000013893653,0.000004574957,0.0000066929706,0.00020570427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992837,0.00001619894,0.00022745231,0.00017066512,0.00004097863,0.00026103389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963576,0.00002815795,0.00006562005,0.00014449873,9.6653e-7,0.00012499216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010592872,0.00011357427,0.00015514676,0.00003317431,0.00009524291,0.000049193466,0.000092106704,0.000049887454,0.00006194187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018525661,0.00008978537,0.000019776973,0.00010399512,0.00029002817,0.00026322814,0.00015585659,0.000060844675,0.0000065302274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016983133,0.000014994971,0.9289301,0.000013647446,0.000014481252,9.658934e-7,0.00036414343,0.012331891,4.3612658e-7,0.054406416,0.0028554029,0.0010505592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006105173,0.000014168248,0.8763722,0.0000059457593,0.000010483172,0.000012345505,0.000040743565,0.1035831,3.7219965e-7,0.016783895,0.0024549307,0.00011127626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8794198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8493224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09125121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012509494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045153018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3661341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007057754","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2014.12.002","title":"Cost to produce Carbon credits by reducing the harvest level in British Columbia, Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hectare; Carbon credit; Revenue; Opportunity cost; Total cost; Agricultural economics; Carbon fibers; Carbon sequestration; Cost estimate; Environmental science; Agricultural science; Business; Economics; Finance; Mathematics; Geography; Greenhouse gas; Agriculture; Ecology; Accounting","score_opus":0.013468348811621088,"score_gpt":0.1993964798512966,"score_spread":0.1859281310396755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007057754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750699,0.000008506707,0.0000016170383,0.0026995693,0.00013370151,0.0003088419,0.00005981433,0.000008486821,0.021709558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805106,0.00003132826,0.000032077915,0.002360571,0.00030355225,0.000037521637,0.000015021776,0.000015143269,0.016694175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990843,0.000023767676,0.00018489125,0.00027988508,0.000055980076,0.00037116892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995353,0.000042923442,0.000051422525,0.00023083593,0.000002136592,0.00013733473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023901089,0.00008706865,0.00012261243,0.000020328409,0.00014970177,0.00023804595,0.00024650892,0.000036087375,0.000093487775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011423918,0.000116540374,0.0000140268185,0.00012710645,0.00010025962,0.00012972631,0.00021007331,0.000087126435,0.000038788803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004958944,0.00002293759,0.6177182,0.00001228113,0.0000072059192,0.0000016351457,0.00035001288,0.0075726123,0.000010940931,0.00056869234,0.3569163,0.016814202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001766399,0.000025462736,0.52417797,0.000010036257,0.0000030559688,0.0000049792284,0.00001905924,0.0034378227,0.000007992815,0.0003454057,0.47163138,0.00016020276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99945533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11471507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029456132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059704595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47523785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008549187","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2008.11.002","title":"Effects of presenting forest simulation results on the forest values and attitudes of forestry professionals and other forest users in Central Labrador","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Suomen Kulttuurirahasto","keywords":"Forest management; Hierarchy; Scale (ratio); Forestry; Environmental resource management; Presentation (obstetrics); Forest ecology; Business; Geography; Psychology; Political science; Environmental science; Ecology; Ecosystem","score_opus":0.014551439898663159,"score_gpt":0.26894814665759376,"score_spread":0.2543967067589306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008549187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959133,0.000043679596,0.000004604336,0.00097409746,0.00003817925,0.00065251073,0.000028828847,0.000011904409,0.0023328783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879265,0.00011443866,0.00010694309,0.00044621667,0.000109270084,0.000013897296,0.000009466763,0.000017879383,0.00038922165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986702,0.000059864135,0.00044610127,0.00031438575,0.00010840101,0.00040103277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987168,0.0006170284,0.0002789151,0.00027992285,0.0000058194887,0.000101552505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032880538,0.00021807551,0.00027369813,0.00014089276,0.00013110116,0.00004699152,0.00022288533,0.00011226802,0.000012030656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003240549,0.00016708212,0.000049687183,0.00014023257,0.0003775627,0.0003140939,0.00023774822,0.00012206497,0.00000510899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001865283,0.00012413954,0.8916658,0.000114525224,0.00001904117,0.0000011862359,0.0011751126,0.07728907,0.000014866173,0.028332002,0.00035468378,0.0007230281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009537854,0.00019030053,0.9323505,0.00012216749,0.000016678408,0.0000012274767,0.000042211286,0.043594733,0.0000789186,0.022028597,0.0004649865,0.00015587303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024113997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045294757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0406847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004822483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017076907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6813411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019700955","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.011","title":"Foreign direct investments in the forest sector: implications for sustainable forest management in developed and developing countries","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"International Business and FDI","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign direct investment; Sustainable forest management; Openness to experience; Developing country; Business; Order (exchange); Sustainable development; Economics; Natural resource economics; International economics; Forest management; Economic growth; Macroeconomics; Geography; Finance; Ecology; Forestry","score_opus":0.026890055523469385,"score_gpt":0.25249073777255254,"score_spread":0.22560068224908317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019700955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96698016,0.00006844299,0.0005961356,0.006279531,0.000044747336,0.000918295,0.000011318258,0.000019846331,0.025081523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928683,0.0003096539,0.00056255865,0.0053128386,0.00029535976,0.00039019552,0.00008412258,0.000022159784,0.00015483038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990012,0.00000366121,0.00030937494,0.0002564264,0.000042016112,0.00038728688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959373,0.000066827415,0.00012305603,0.00013535457,0.00006872054,0.000012325438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003288491,0.00017214108,0.00017597807,0.0004336363,0.00026098496,0.00042529177,0.0002040383,0.00005787238,0.0000017379756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006626943,0.00014827105,0.000028058765,0.00025388403,0.00007525651,0.0009462334,0.00016166609,0.00005464986,0.000005508879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000263481,0.000019435456,0.18545498,0.000151669,0.0000149477255,0.0000023854864,0.00009493239,0.0025465232,7.151117e-8,0.8113523,0.00010823908,0.00022818442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086588366,0.0000051561533,0.5115761,0.000030345203,0.000009406027,0.0000029530577,0.00028845106,0.000797737,5.9069487e-7,0.42828873,0.05799306,0.00014158967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003618638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017246533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38306355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021254363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008432024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.962397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022854708","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.007","title":"The long-run determinants of U.S. lumber imported from Canada revisited","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Foreign Agricultural Service","keywords":"Cointegration; Softwood; Economics; Exchange rate; Econometrics; Agricultural economics; Macroeconomics; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering","score_opus":0.013329652570741195,"score_gpt":0.2072623510560676,"score_spread":0.1939326984853264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022854708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654461,0.000028790806,6.643963e-7,0.00009290217,0.00006286086,0.00009790467,0.00004293879,0.000006002021,0.034221802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997091,0.00027427505,0.000042345273,0.000362975,0.00007926705,0.0000045688826,0.000009984194,0.000010009839,0.0021255785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993192,0.00001206276,0.00023971123,0.0001499244,0.000041042724,0.0002380639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994681,0.00004038357,0.00013718191,0.00026416953,0.000002448952,0.00008774851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009177899,0.00010167793,0.00012738624,0.000019050305,0.0001207879,0.000018827872,0.00022319662,0.00003693093,0.000583901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025105759,0.00007961563,0.000029465307,0.0000647676,0.00018484963,0.000115927556,0.00018967476,0.000044408494,0.00007855778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018076264,0.000008309808,0.9881915,0.0000040328655,0.0000147108,0.0000022783847,0.00015668543,0.000022872935,0.0000013222741,0.002070148,0.0059527466,0.003557322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016170701,0.000020093641,0.9553193,0.0000048712195,0.000012870964,0.0000019367753,0.000009198703,0.0012799648,0.0000733076,0.0030840666,0.039922133,0.000110557885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91381127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.936789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033969387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006485709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042828375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6393307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027657370","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2012.08.007","title":"Regional economic impacts of climate change and adaptation in Canadian forests: A CGE modeling analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Computable general equilibrium; Climate change; Adaptation (eye); Climate change adaptation; Economics; Economic analysis; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Agricultural economics; Macroeconomics; Ecology","score_opus":0.0396995295090246,"score_gpt":0.2487459743001553,"score_spread":0.20904644479113071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027657370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99405974,0.00007208856,0.000005783999,0.00041245116,0.000022217451,0.00012464573,0.000041763626,0.0000043975724,0.0052568964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998164,0.0012204165,0.00013217895,0.00027236232,0.00013140086,0.000013346702,0.000030544827,0.0000090025005,0.000026751399],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991443,0.00001147353,0.00022402013,0.00014192895,0.0000224184,0.0004558706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952286,0.000018051483,0.00008207294,0.00011407121,0.0000012029004,0.00026173817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025534543,0.00010343087,0.00016301849,0.0003842566,0.000061180064,0.000023425626,0.000069712834,0.000056248376,0.00009386644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010062637,0.00011113639,0.00003893596,0.00013220859,0.00007513033,0.00057851564,0.00007702636,0.00004032389,0.000049152106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010947175,0.000007368907,0.92363745,0.00000944769,0.000021515514,1.5877588e-7,0.0013220558,0.043279912,2.0606916e-7,0.030449187,0.000032952674,0.001228807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014796603,0.000014287753,0.4692549,0.0000039274005,0.00002749197,0.000001312029,0.00003879876,0.527642,2.641252e-7,0.0013226576,0.0014546604,0.00009170752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7310321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9458877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4843621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028117993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022883401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45320106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028368755","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2009.10.005","title":"Forest–mill integration: A transaction cost perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Transaction cost; Mill; Database transaction; Logit; Public ownership; Perspective (graphical); Business; Economics; Industrial organization; Natural resource economics; Microeconomics; Agricultural economics; Public economics; Econometrics; Geography","score_opus":0.011106608216411929,"score_gpt":0.23804114642521412,"score_spread":0.2269345382088022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028368755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7055871,0.000020583211,0.000519722,0.0057366965,0.00009754178,0.00032243843,0.000013551533,0.00005277101,0.28764957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929297,0.00021327221,0.00021999302,0.0017782636,0.00030687195,0.000012581943,0.000012347171,0.000009284481,0.0045176744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930996,0.000012001036,0.00015042373,0.00023029708,0.000040611983,0.00025668123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999659,0.000018568458,0.000054480763,0.00015446726,0.000004118913,0.00010938832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009057759,0.00013821988,0.00011699714,0.00008185518,0.0001478945,0.00007084084,0.000115902934,0.00006484955,0.00044192627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020727253,0.00013364716,0.00005415579,0.00011584847,0.00012103848,0.0004302933,0.000026480144,0.00008676544,0.0005513914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014742561,0.0001312246,0.019720884,0.000006667296,0.000031471696,0.0000033378835,0.005270141,0.022441873,0.00004132476,0.8651519,0.016630782,0.07042301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013006582,0.0006397977,0.31261384,0.00001780275,0.000050718776,0.00003969036,0.0005008209,0.06056463,0.00012375794,0.32668555,0.29668406,0.00077868433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032785418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00451015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53846633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002780609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012052843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7087205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034840425","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2010.08.004","title":"Modeling the timber supply impact of introducing weevil-resistant spruce in British Columbia with cellular automata","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Damages; Weevil; Scale (ratio); Forest management; Environmental science; Stock (firearms); Simulation modeling; Forestry; Environmental resource management; Agricultural engineering; Agroforestry; Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Agronomy; Economics; Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.004979025897610967,"score_gpt":0.19970599172864403,"score_spread":0.19472696583103308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034840425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956136,0.000011268979,0.000008000311,0.00024329146,0.000033134103,0.00018734187,0.000031914653,0.000012113267,0.0038593875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986509,0.000060643266,0.00027966892,0.00008409593,0.00013848011,0.0000085679,0.0000096695285,0.00001768752,0.00075027783],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917114,0.000014165978,0.00023098038,0.0002259496,0.000051546765,0.00030624802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950564,0.000027298021,0.00007258627,0.0003170997,0.0000032596154,0.00007412205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002627179,0.00009783578,0.00016206589,0.00003827779,0.000112289825,0.00017851737,0.00023410923,0.000053819855,0.00058533286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027089902,0.000100575715,0.00004722644,0.00012543208,0.00021992154,0.00018215156,0.00018471827,0.00015139299,0.000045693767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003227404,0.000047835594,0.66453594,0.000018025648,0.00002458367,0.00000407489,0.00039512664,0.32997885,0.00021117531,0.0010800047,0.0019225278,0.0017496032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065123045,0.00013011723,0.40197447,0.000032779793,0.000017056955,0.00001867327,0.000028117849,0.59149885,0.00001235673,0.0028250448,0.0025662605,0.00024501572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4685235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69917256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26256144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007881051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034631463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64089847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039967736","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.010","title":"Preferences of community public advisory group members for characteristics of Canadian forest tenures in pursuit of sustainable forest management objectives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Government of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Forest management; Sustainable forest management; Business; Environmental resource management; Public participation; Cornerstone; Environmental economics; Marketing; Geography; Economics; Political science; Public administration; Forestry; Management","score_opus":0.022467471658840842,"score_gpt":0.22952759931854935,"score_spread":0.20706012765970852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039967736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96496147,0.000028751465,0.000008172115,0.00022633863,0.000048907674,0.00062799273,0.00011507645,0.0000057608763,0.033977557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984078,0.00027364245,0.00023615696,0.00009031247,0.00005282267,0.000071936345,0.000073334326,0.000017747332,0.0007762681],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865407,0.000056622634,0.00046254057,0.00012895385,0.00007575371,0.0006220606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990456,0.00014000069,0.00030107997,0.0003067113,0.0000146674965,0.0001919011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007564315,0.00017379761,0.00033071492,0.00069471233,0.00012937363,0.000028073231,0.0004485925,0.000090473965,0.00007255606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113622766,0.00017640444,0.00007073403,0.00033755766,0.0004565445,0.0005477447,0.00033276548,0.00009839097,0.0000045217857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004962309,0.00014060603,0.71247536,0.00032299152,0.000041791034,1.7800907e-7,0.0019263348,0.00081541034,0.0000032263458,0.28204542,0.00068827136,0.0014907744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005342002,0.00018549204,0.95280993,0.000020105934,0.000027344297,7.4546347e-7,0.0016385053,0.0004424339,0.0000156911,0.014731983,0.029424708,0.00016886462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35148266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5368826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26731345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018798535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041906456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7193565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044166085","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2005.01.005","title":"Inter-regional comparisons of production technology in Canada's timber harvesting industries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Productivity; Economics; Capital (architecture); Agricultural economics; Logging; Technical change; Total factor productivity; Technological change; Production function; Microeconomics; Forestry; Geography; Economic growth; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.01748156830963444,"score_gpt":0.21905670642496328,"score_spread":0.20157513811532884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044166085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98189557,0.000009020844,0.0000034766285,0.009943132,0.000032673415,0.00007685319,0.0000047734557,0.0000073771757,0.008027133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724615,0.00002389197,0.00027324603,0.00021549097,0.00010383789,0.0000061361707,0.0000050472604,0.0000053656636,0.0021208592],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946636,0.0000062744916,0.00018659605,0.00013476821,0.00002583588,0.00018019302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976224,0.000014867593,0.000078487676,0.00010626889,0.0000020593734,0.000036106234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006474264,0.000073583375,0.00010749876,0.00011138278,0.00003902721,0.000008670548,0.00010045875,0.000042254665,0.0001078676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040136685,0.000077653836,0.0000092010705,0.0001618862,0.00017851884,0.00016191168,0.00012510661,0.0000859431,0.000036643687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008056528,0.00001807964,0.9163406,0.0000055286396,0.000005442309,3.827427e-7,0.00010048528,0.04396572,0.0000060880957,0.012181235,0.018388947,0.008979468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003355334,0.000038040074,0.40098664,0.000023462198,0.0000067654987,0.000018319719,0.00012763593,0.020002028,0.00024108174,0.0025044626,0.57549393,0.00022209501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78091276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9717506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.557105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032740438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009272749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31666315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047162276","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2004.11.002","title":"Field testing of a criteria and indicators system for sustainable forest management at the local level. Case study results concerning the sustainability of the private forest Haliburton Forest and Wild Life Reserve in Ontario, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Haliburton Forest & Wild Life Reserve; University of Toronto","funders":"World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Sustainable forest management; Forest management; Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Management by objectives; Identification (biology); Set (abstract data type); Sustainable development; Computer science; Business; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Geography","score_opus":0.02098976301752144,"score_gpt":0.23751815622513428,"score_spread":0.21652839320761283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047162276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943405,0.00003310114,0.0000118547605,0.0018730478,0.00003487351,0.002077836,0.000042701908,0.0000071775735,0.0015789414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981354,0.000009885988,0.000048553225,0.00023453818,0.000055087738,0.0001271435,0.0000057125044,0.000018457764,0.001365254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820614,0.000096096235,0.00065168424,0.00038834065,0.0001259089,0.0005318275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835366,0.00059363944,0.00038068253,0.0005326369,0.000022555176,0.00011683435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011248607,0.0002355091,0.0002999892,0.00008999434,0.00057125656,0.000082978084,0.00038439952,0.000071602866,0.000008953584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040600882,0.00015292128,0.00004446771,0.00024106145,0.00058570347,0.00024998654,0.0013338325,0.00016981947,3.2381777e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002466318,0.00003933968,0.94463235,0.00025387216,0.000042409636,0.000024543862,0.003003233,0.040060915,1.497559e-7,0.009986213,0.0010526584,0.0006576869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024457304,0.00044840208,0.92977357,0.00007995037,0.00009926734,0.000063915904,0.017044866,0.030621082,0.000014626442,0.0016663689,0.017435936,0.00030629084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9656726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030979387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011218826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021235769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6235948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061732185","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2012.01.004","title":"Cultural uses of non-timber forest products among the Sts'ailes, British Columbia, Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Possession (linguistics); Geography; Citizen journalism; Archaeology; Political science","score_opus":0.02271573829445532,"score_gpt":0.29140639243650274,"score_spread":0.2686906541420474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061732185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896529,0.0001877685,6.713474e-7,0.0009012043,0.0007646712,0.0006420034,0.00017183297,0.000009137918,0.007669836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911666,0.00044498337,0.000030581043,0.001156869,0.0014841656,0.000093714996,0.000030735588,0.000019398822,0.0055729304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838984,0.000053530483,0.0003786215,0.00015207245,0.00003595163,0.0009899567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999176,0.00017692528,0.00022664526,0.00020273398,0.00009758361,0.00012010217],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031745253,0.000101226055,0.0002823032,0.00001632136,0.0022373907,0.000027381268,0.0001378183,0.00011774549,0.00008887864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016816192,0.00010370666,0.00003213788,0.00006073868,0.0002422045,0.00016762564,0.00021705923,0.00019211788,0.000013356361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005309451,0.000019809913,0.9090573,0.000090320544,0.000043024444,5.768981e-7,0.0059225443,0.0000541241,2.647611e-7,0.0010795369,0.08363037,0.000096780066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024551238,0.000031722346,0.8626596,0.000020549816,0.000017099555,0.0000081036615,0.006365487,0.000048384325,8.101679e-7,0.0001959224,0.13029103,0.000115818475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99988896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04666066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003055965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089758413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065159383","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2014.06.007","title":"Increasing resilience of timber supply: How a variable buffer stock of timber can efficiently reduce exposure to shortfalls caused by wildfires","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval; Centre de Géomatique du Québec","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Indian Council of Agricultural Research","keywords":"Time horizon; Stock (firearms); Greenhouse gas; Forest management; Environmental science; Business; Buffer zone; Management strategy; Water supply; Taiga; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Forestry; Agroforestry; Environmental engineering; Finance; Economics; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.004702907469040083,"score_gpt":0.19811427906370552,"score_spread":0.19341137159466543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065159383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99606246,0.00001665451,0.00011662313,0.00042653066,0.000082956896,0.00038015618,0.00012807039,0.000015980868,0.0027705543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828327,0.000009771353,0.0007327069,0.00021782656,0.00007876417,0.000021376789,0.000014332128,0.000028334563,0.00061360205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986399,0.00010260907,0.00033949938,0.00039459596,0.00011551791,0.00040787557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988857,0.000246705,0.00019596958,0.0004386637,0.000010312073,0.00022267444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059348723,0.00020228041,0.0003729926,0.00007836142,0.00008685212,0.000045472414,0.0002808322,0.00011590952,0.000068342444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027749967,0.00020032193,0.000045494213,0.00017871535,0.00020390627,0.00018604424,0.0002077313,0.00008595145,0.00002144005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016157415,0.0001876965,0.88821435,0.00013528462,0.000049461258,9.41727e-7,0.0015298469,0.06805636,0.027474511,0.0018666825,0.010773484,0.0015498335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018002383,0.0015679282,0.8463445,0.00028653763,0.000075205644,0.000056785873,0.00013289944,0.09879846,0.020869948,0.00086229714,0.028099366,0.0011058897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02868531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040246877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041869882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017485982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070773441","doi":"10.1016/s1389-9341(03)00067-4","title":"An analysis of lumber trade restrictions in North America: application of a spatial equilibrium model","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Agricultural economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.009938937857231954,"score_gpt":0.23209590211177103,"score_spread":0.22215696425453907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070773441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99081284,0.0000027047831,0.001282088,0.00007839844,0.000006627357,0.00010866778,0.000045736124,0.0000053207978,0.0076576197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926734,0.000053595708,0.000454322,0.00007524518,0.000015457743,0.000012731332,0.000038834838,0.0000061499854,0.000076346674],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939,0.000017034792,0.00024797485,0.00016401798,0.00003448263,0.00014649575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995769,0.000015885387,0.00012442023,0.0002231814,0.0000014220257,0.0000581539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006348448,0.00007506422,0.00017398759,0.00022516242,0.000022116516,0.000007506373,0.00010097725,0.00003572185,0.000045494777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011587838,0.00008214833,0.000049968086,0.00051914266,0.0001396351,0.00017572634,0.000032327953,0.000036052348,0.000008731234],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056920753,0.00004655257,0.4888405,0.0000027816413,0.000017347988,3.4953956e-8,0.0002357743,0.5025797,0.000018021286,0.007620965,0.000020009178,0.0006126414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010055147,0.000025223499,0.42226464,3.4461905e-7,0.00004396335,1.2705792e-7,0.000010718772,0.57573843,0.000009785722,0.0008369684,0.0009157887,0.000053433978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02875153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057058834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07315877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005670872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014139351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075006055","doi":"10.1016/s1389-9341(02)00002-3","title":"Assessing the effect of public involvement processes in forest management in Quebec","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Forest management; Environmental resource management; Business; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Forestry; Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.022782054683357627,"score_gpt":0.24879110410170302,"score_spread":0.2260090494183454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075006055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95316,0.00006553067,0.0000039203683,0.0012091068,0.000030328085,0.00038691884,0.0000018057345,0.000009126696,0.045133267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971306,0.00042606835,0.00004131968,0.00024001945,0.00004887167,0.000068837544,0.0000050452754,0.000011974374,0.002027305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899465,0.000051833194,0.00030274448,0.00022152843,0.00006704424,0.0003622306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995114,0.000106122316,0.00010604929,0.00021980489,0.0000016687902,0.000054955683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044317692,0.00015044476,0.00017610636,0.00019700098,0.00006989494,0.00013753452,0.0002694152,0.000045127654,0.00019505201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004989276,0.000114669165,0.00003068416,0.00037316864,0.0002120861,0.0006504449,0.00029777078,0.000081662074,0.0000985042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059121335,0.000049868144,0.9596041,0.00013812268,0.000012941435,0.0000026205987,0.00069119845,0.0097309295,7.4844337e-7,0.009671445,0.00068863237,0.019403506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015339557,0.00017362142,0.904212,0.000062565494,0.00001912986,0.0000021198255,0.00019628508,0.03217779,0.000028194578,0.0036454464,0.05762953,0.0003193466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032324377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24514742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21282305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021679231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007885002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9741195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075226186","doi":"10.1016/s1389-9341(03)00003-0","title":"Application of real options theory to forestry investment analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Binomial options pricing model; Reforestation; Option value; Investment (military); Profitability index; Valuation of options; Asian option; Net present value; Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Forestry; Finance; Incentive; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.01816441871376907,"score_gpt":0.23572567459591762,"score_spread":0.21756125588214856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075226186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96944934,0.0014797652,0.0054175435,0.0002938972,0.00004792408,0.00020946855,0.00020876848,0.000017429586,0.02287584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99283534,0.0037666934,0.001703788,0.00045861368,0.000069975904,0.00005047234,0.000060441995,0.00001469752,0.0010399873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989155,0.0000148467225,0.0005300345,0.00031331464,0.000013838421,0.00021247951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991658,0.000048403534,0.000256783,0.0003549287,0.000014960549,0.00015913272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037696358,0.00013155685,0.00039953893,0.0007428694,0.000091267815,0.00003928327,0.00011754572,0.00008457056,0.000056626435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006219808,0.00014815324,0.00020112004,0.0005370465,0.00008671949,0.0001340091,0.000040603667,0.000050602324,0.00010077969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006885183,0.000043436223,0.08574988,0.0000067927704,0.00030615958,8.5770374e-8,0.00025909976,0.0069752517,0.0000027836365,0.90652096,0.000045995082,0.00008267576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021732094,0.000054055017,0.072811656,0.0000016760891,0.00012732291,0.0000010031479,0.00012362534,0.010112361,0.000059990598,0.902061,0.01422351,0.00020650115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001755698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007773468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023385966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009616172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002624797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6041514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077637479","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2013.07.004","title":"Positioning non-timber forest products on the development agenda","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Terry Fox Research Institute; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Livelihood; Poverty; Business; Sustainable development; Land use; Environmental resource management; Economics; Natural resource economics; Environmental planning; Economic growth; Agriculture; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.017378245632213598,"score_gpt":0.18770436528801648,"score_spread":0.17032611965580288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077637479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9553457,0.0000024744336,0.000019116862,0.0069683376,0.000043566644,0.00026582187,0.0000023290222,0.000011368526,0.037341323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99288523,0.000017051454,0.00038084865,0.0025123903,0.00009365204,0.000022886055,0.000010986614,0.000005838847,0.0040710936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945354,0.00000960467,0.00011654943,0.00018577052,0.00004465941,0.00018985328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971354,0.000027551634,0.000049735256,0.00015477574,0.0000044584935,0.000049926402],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011204877,0.00009316623,0.000061759005,0.000032159907,0.0004367365,0.000096198055,0.00013342721,0.000028218834,0.0003343933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016674481,0.000069169946,0.000018453666,0.00006142402,0.000107205015,0.00011861485,0.00023006658,0.000042330674,0.001037077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009519592,0.00005443063,0.96384126,0.00001383365,0.00003286422,6.627414e-7,0.0027654732,0.010452297,0.000020018317,0.002343959,0.01635229,0.004113392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105294246,0.000019518899,0.88433486,0.0000047109306,0.0000040207524,0.0000012324025,0.00014289729,0.0017795608,0.000063727966,0.0010108289,0.112430654,0.00010270667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014085721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013730217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096078366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012111649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001440042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078215034","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2012.05.006","title":"How can formal research networks produce more socially robust forest science?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Excellence; Civil society; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Knowledge management; Business; Process (computing); Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04080440684104418,"score_gpt":0.279822431919911,"score_spread":0.23901802507886682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078215034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96768874,0.000033255907,0.00008066599,0.010930477,0.00020442689,0.00037150795,0.000012337712,0.00003698071,0.020641603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886329,0.00019221564,0.00033429445,0.00050754525,0.0015742587,0.000038617014,0.00001127303,0.000028457262,0.008680439],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973307,0.00003218827,0.00019761245,0.0003945981,0.00020862564,0.0018362388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989816,0.00006386477,0.000090394286,0.00039622135,0.000015785707,0.00045215178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016438288,0.00020236583,0.00017558371,0.00023798105,0.0009904258,0.0003483974,0.00055401964,0.000107562686,0.00009977217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018718083,0.00017434664,0.00005403205,0.0005618653,0.001990403,0.0019932494,0.0011202501,0.00021009936,0.00016909538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003381286,0.00008284355,0.66142756,0.000018153336,0.00001720772,0.000001150332,0.0016612501,0.023506833,0.00001812007,0.28782916,0.016830945,0.008572952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000670658,0.000168307,0.7969952,0.00001529136,0.000020259384,0.000020242489,0.00029267243,0.023032634,0.000051951807,0.010712883,0.16738272,0.00063718494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038637368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009014754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27711627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005012886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013763642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7617654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084679390","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.001","title":"Economics of sustainable forest management","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Forest management; Sustainable forest management; Natural resource economics; Business; Economics; Forestry; Geography","score_opus":0.004165362238074059,"score_gpt":0.20604116725047406,"score_spread":0.2018758050124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084679390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21568227,0.00016365292,0.000024659192,0.0007792131,0.21111125,0.0019392096,0.00050009426,0.00011422506,0.56968546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07523354,0.017112788,0.0011447469,0.0005756281,0.6503052,0.000252061,0.0012775516,0.00035304864,0.25374544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782157,0.000017545386,0.00061600836,0.0006199115,0.00011714561,0.0008078042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985791,0.00011175227,0.0004461995,0.00064521853,0.000012060763,0.00020566945],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003183273,0.00046844597,0.0005624856,0.00032212443,0.00017381822,0.00013140959,0.00065765425,0.00050307886,0.00036769005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073307885,0.0005160836,0.00017413114,0.00015703867,0.0004567286,0.00041078913,0.0012246672,0.00028412914,0.0005695256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049379483,0.000054448446,0.0014821909,0.0003351913,0.00010301352,0.000008651395,0.0001554708,0.038163424,3.6140065e-8,0.24656148,0.71246904,0.0006176559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007730629,0.00011786363,0.001001347,0.000030425299,0.000077898614,0.0000013822372,0.000043696262,0.00043140663,0.0000013360494,0.053612,0.9434538,0.00045576968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012127132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004246338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43919396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009519885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014153315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086777009","doi":"10.1016/s1389-9341(03)00011-x","title":"Private or self-regulation? A comparative study of forest certification choices in Canada, the United States and Germany","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Victoria","funders":"Science Foundation Ireland","keywords":"Certification; Certified wood; Business; Stewardship (theology); Corporate governance; Standardization; Professional certification (computer technology); Environmental resource management; Accounting; Finance; Economics; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.033567105682028066,"score_gpt":0.27130358772226354,"score_spread":0.23773648204023548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086777009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985494,0.000014341622,0.0000018671909,0.00036685012,0.000033269385,0.0004244668,0.000007686144,0.000008195947,0.0005938954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956644,0.000035318346,0.0000047234716,0.00026456296,0.00007468393,0.000011103899,0.000017640128,0.0000057799057,0.000019758369],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939746,0.000023580482,0.0002446593,0.00012649935,0.000038244572,0.00016957264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958026,0.00008603356,0.00016430077,0.000108743785,0.000045199253,0.000015476155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017452138,0.000100883175,0.00016236212,0.00011596815,0.0001544933,0.00011026065,0.00007809964,0.000024401654,0.000003598613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006710014,0.00007489692,0.00001144738,0.00025062138,0.000060190534,0.00034942987,0.000032419728,0.000048643367,5.974755e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034514727,0.000094449024,0.9259675,0.000053174554,0.000028922386,3.0751386e-7,0.003640211,0.009620344,1.6914744e-7,0.060483247,0.00004388114,0.000033236458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049572374,0.00002037,0.95122755,0.000004696934,0.000021001077,3.4417525e-7,0.017141039,0.0124002015,9.769111e-7,0.014120637,0.0044771526,0.00009029178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8584342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9616743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10324011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014307475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013743498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30542076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087060082","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2005.01.001","title":"Multi-attribute evaluation of landscape-level fuel management to reduce wildfire risk","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Risk management; Wildland–urban interface; Prescribed burn; Forest management; Sample (material); Climate change; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Environmental planning; Environmental economics; Environmental science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.028084934969526444,"score_gpt":0.2665758639417995,"score_spread":0.23849092897227306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087060082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953258,0.000040310948,0.000117367985,0.00045910437,0.00007611769,0.0004800884,0.000086083084,0.000013868931,0.003401278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965265,0.00012520106,0.002575441,0.00016257509,0.00013444739,0.000044030592,0.000012693827,0.000013102096,0.00040601118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915004,0.00004625006,0.00023675778,0.00024898624,0.000096718824,0.00022122984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947935,0.00003051416,0.00012338645,0.0002481589,0.000004730539,0.000113859875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007497136,0.00011392241,0.00014455928,0.000071521696,0.00006581035,0.000022610206,0.00014606952,0.00005162507,0.00008982694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005820355,0.000116032,0.000034815832,0.000092332295,0.000039037892,0.00019180398,0.00014937886,0.000047321286,0.00040129788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053546217,0.00020970902,0.58701766,0.00006789774,0.00009730614,7.315394e-7,0.0017117893,0.16838878,0.00015169749,0.0007125437,0.0055757263,0.2360126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008752415,0.00004983256,0.8299237,0.000012949726,0.00003589397,0.0000036202198,0.000045201825,0.15546778,0.00014867786,0.00021808702,0.0130735235,0.00014549457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019503884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005126048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24290602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025292794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000123831605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5158006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087916776","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2007.11.004","title":"Responding to the Kyoto Protocol through forestry: A comparison of opportunities for several countries in Europe","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; University of British Columbia; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Ministry of Earth Sciences; Ministry of Education, India; University of Victoria","keywords":"Kyoto Protocol; Sustainability; Incentive; Carbon sequestration; Natural resource economics; Business; Context (archaeology); Climate change; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Carbon offset; Afforestation; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Agriculture; Economics; Forestry; Geography","score_opus":0.08270773036153818,"score_gpt":0.31564250816940165,"score_spread":0.23293477780786348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087916776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95852494,0.0000029582602,0.00005399002,0.003284808,0.000033653796,0.011755814,0.000048268834,0.000013051527,0.026282508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784451,0.000047850346,0.00066170975,0.0017735505,0.00019807788,0.009019131,0.00001168284,0.00002446235,0.009818428],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991631,0.000023203482,0.00030341904,0.00016842174,0.000053367232,0.00028848255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955094,0.00008560129,0.000110394394,0.0001892991,0.000006574784,0.000057210906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019815822,0.00012525378,0.00018869099,0.00013032451,0.0001859686,0.000032040705,0.0002336857,0.000040364885,0.0000699497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072034636,0.00010099612,0.00003106404,0.0002465504,0.00026943823,0.00027871685,0.00021368798,0.000055688655,0.000048440234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007461238,0.00008852715,0.5418885,0.00010173692,0.000022157545,0.0000036896233,0.014039155,0.046657987,0.0000037301247,0.31560346,0.07991153,0.0009334158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005614913,0.00021537344,0.05411439,0.000015062594,0.0000042895617,0.0000047417784,0.00014798174,0.006764847,0.000035665395,0.0025565927,0.93543005,0.00014950168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017936911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002388119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8555185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006964823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044305427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4118502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102056582","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.005","title":"Options for maintaining forest productivity after natural disturbance: A principal–agent approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Incentive; Profitability index; Forest management; Silviculture; Economic rent; Business; Principal (computer security); Mountain pine beetle; Agroforestry; Forester; Natural resource economics; Natural resource; Regeneration (biology); Environmental resource management; Forestry; Economics; Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Computer science; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.015885347802573894,"score_gpt":0.23813161103143782,"score_spread":0.22224626322886393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102056582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983941,0.00010174732,0.00031536332,0.0005656175,0.00019512039,0.00060429354,0.00003793796,0.00003574176,0.014203154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889555,0.000045450404,0.0023861146,0.00036355606,0.0010483958,0.00033243874,0.000049105154,0.000025551824,0.006793874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987956,0.000018534272,0.00019490095,0.00030504842,0.000050850973,0.0006350561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942446,0.000034583336,0.000085032356,0.00027187855,0.000003337457,0.00018073231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033525637,0.00019328557,0.00016483612,0.000067782035,0.00022297718,0.000072273215,0.00015763017,0.000061539926,0.00007728773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005539226,0.00017961967,0.00008309231,0.000096462485,0.00022191004,0.00063993275,0.00029598578,0.00010277703,0.00015676183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011890063,0.0001733445,0.77910006,0.00005170483,0.000041216677,3.088905e-7,0.0014657961,0.009977349,0.0000043066984,0.2034584,0.003151728,0.0024568664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004754355,0.00005854989,0.67010224,0.00000593767,0.000033096872,0.000011826855,0.00004097964,0.01948868,0.000007941078,0.006153882,0.3032441,0.00037733055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044613818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057179946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30009237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021835974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012817123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7324678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107248147","doi":"10.1016/s1389-9341(02)00078-3","title":"Mosaic of reform: forest policy in post-1978 China","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"China; Afforestation; Devolution (biology); Business; Logging; Natural resource economics; Geography; Economics; Forestry","score_opus":0.009839809078686394,"score_gpt":0.21153749404008526,"score_spread":0.20169768496139887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107248147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7968313,0.000033889675,9.824033e-7,0.002855805,0.000036955007,0.00016390743,0.000040820065,0.000017429375,0.20001891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99171305,0.000850743,0.00012852432,0.0007916449,0.00024322017,0.000013976608,0.000023945917,0.000020365876,0.006214506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876237,0.000017848643,0.00037921613,0.00027675444,0.00006591715,0.00049790065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924475,0.000021493795,0.00013936141,0.00044320704,0.0000025663023,0.00014861245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014150354,0.00020277764,0.0002473405,0.00031141876,0.00008489587,0.000036377798,0.0003958799,0.0001042382,0.0009018273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077480436,0.00019638576,0.0000735253,0.00032104822,0.00028915328,0.00043129153,0.00044594603,0.000116498115,0.00069876213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008775866,0.00034991556,0.51290655,0.000098255485,0.000048387516,0.000008273829,0.0035535777,0.018475434,0.000039668783,0.42955843,0.012938258,0.021935467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014414705,0.00039403996,0.7751465,0.00002405776,0.000016111304,0.000022160062,0.00006171338,0.03287697,0.00003125378,0.040051766,0.14938584,0.00054811535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061718635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020830518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38950667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034541974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017221055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99703676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110204860","doi":"10.1016/s1389-9341(99)00007-6","title":"Remuneration for silviculture in British Columbia: insights from transaction cost economics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Remuneration; Payment; Transaction cost; Business; Database transaction; Silviculture; Forest management; Economics; Finance; Agricultural economics; Forestry; Geography; Database","score_opus":0.006618539221586249,"score_gpt":0.18957975069443758,"score_spread":0.18296121147285133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110204860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98692966,0.000020961525,0.00001436984,0.00036247654,0.000065885855,0.00041949135,0.000100731646,0.0000181083,0.012068343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988813,0.0011120259,0.00021715919,0.0008136483,0.0003107308,0.00006996366,0.00019993963,0.0000167898,0.008446784],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992586,0.000011534016,0.00022857802,0.00026977455,0.000018276596,0.0002132573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997239,0.000029796985,0.000049770366,0.00012016868,0.000001723526,0.00007461893],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004952917,0.00009170571,0.00014443343,0.000026897636,0.00015432651,0.00027704248,0.000099874436,0.000113221024,0.0012295711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006760527,0.00014314882,0.000044576558,0.000060704126,0.00007883822,0.00052132556,0.00001774828,0.0000671464,0.00017790146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021553901,0.00031835295,0.23486562,0.000046311314,0.00007767713,0.0000052764467,0.003340729,0.2690131,0.00006481651,0.007941308,0.041291732,0.4428195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016572296,0.00009829077,0.23408262,0.000016420117,0.000018397139,0.0000056514245,0.000041306786,0.068475075,0.000013052816,0.02953067,0.66567665,0.00038461725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10567838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7582733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6525949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001863955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010811706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121945765","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.014","title":"Barriers to innovation in response to regulatory reform: Performance-based forest practices regulation in British Columbia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Regulatory reform; Stewardship (theology); Business; Forest management; Environmental stewardship; Liability; Process (computing); Environmental resource management; Environmental regulation; Regulatory authority; Accounting; Forestry; Economics; Natural resource economics; Public administration; Political science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.018549211120500106,"score_gpt":0.24317772037785693,"score_spread":0.22462850925735683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121945765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911905,0.000002454721,0.000005337798,0.0021747996,0.0000663137,0.00043815834,0.000009515657,0.00001969776,0.00609325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944407,0.000007888908,0.0003997674,0.0020446596,0.0000882087,0.00006188182,0.000020117252,0.000018065071,0.0029187275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881244,0.000052150644,0.0003986026,0.00029768396,0.000092235685,0.00034688163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926376,0.000034730812,0.00018541726,0.00024025484,0.000010564888,0.00026527967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012924273,0.00010314125,0.00014837086,0.00034753323,0.000093355266,0.00020916996,0.00016929784,0.000088397326,0.00013566887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007550808,0.0001609013,0.000014839923,0.00080614147,0.00008154049,0.00076813914,0.00015526604,0.000088038476,0.00018840481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034888522,0.000016897187,0.90231156,0.000010045823,0.000001938205,0.0000018694523,0.00056937156,0.08868098,0.000015398553,0.00059890497,0.004750305,0.002693846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073432433,0.00018640357,0.9227824,0.000028162536,0.0000020873895,0.0000030073838,0.00009792479,0.016232198,0.000007988366,0.0012385692,0.058493566,0.00019333193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12489452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5603131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43541858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011348213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014533135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88093287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122275914","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.005","title":"A benefit–cost analysis of establishing protected natural areas in New Brunswick, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Cost–benefit analysis; Present value; Net present value; Contingent valuation; Valuation (finance); Opportunity cost; Time horizon; Economics; Discounting; Value (mathematics); Social benefits; Total economic value; Bioeconomics; Total cost; Natural resource economics; Business; Agricultural economics; Willingness to pay; Microeconomics; Fishery; Finance; Ecology; Ecosystem services; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03151384042823968,"score_gpt":0.2049190677095833,"score_spread":0.1734052272813436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122275914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947162,0.0003828199,0.00008403288,0.0010013097,0.00007691908,0.00021432822,0.000088826775,0.000007320137,0.0034282084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981781,0.00025516216,0.00023669991,0.00055033964,0.000089243586,0.0000031506142,0.00009387817,0.000010533077,0.00058286556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987194,0.0000055943697,0.00065784075,0.00032214037,0.00001521777,0.00027981965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927545,0.000043126704,0.0003440988,0.00021917393,0.000004963513,0.00011316209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021373652,0.00014902587,0.00048664847,0.0005358422,0.000048460624,0.000052916268,0.00014989564,0.00008313114,0.00006350877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008509758,0.0001905875,0.00008546336,0.00034628794,0.000030517422,0.0003722478,0.000036723,0.0001181498,0.000007663542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016533195,0.000023761637,0.7302049,0.00000517269,0.00009733622,5.0656314e-7,0.00021028254,0.025700657,0.0000014654653,0.2415603,0.00006352959,0.002115606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046869175,0.000027018647,0.94233733,0.0000062956256,0.000022813845,0.0000013446986,0.000041654323,0.03650537,0.000012263083,0.018575022,0.0018145869,0.00018759305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77630574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93646604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22298527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005140887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036351246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77719325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126073678","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2009.07.008","title":"Why Brazilian companies are certifying their forests?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Business; Certified wood; Stewardship (theology); Certificate; Incentive; Marketing; Shareholder; Forest management; Accounting; Forestry; Corporate governance; Finance; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.031093363679046235,"score_gpt":0.25841929735190877,"score_spread":0.22732593367286252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126073678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724945,0.00008786739,0.000019776693,0.010429933,0.0001364906,0.00018019676,0.000016336677,0.00009746553,0.016537461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836378,0.000052142877,0.000012628982,0.014252929,0.0019441209,0.0000028547463,0.000021931874,0.000015902508,0.000059684357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990235,0.0000063897346,0.00023668304,0.00023550547,0.00003925145,0.0004586864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953586,0.000029944827,0.00015303133,0.00019334923,0.00004577532,0.000042062442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013916747,0.00020866554,0.00026949844,0.00015837247,0.00037619102,0.0005594431,0.00019109789,0.000097588454,0.000013944772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013461692,0.00019515403,0.00010556185,0.00015680197,0.00011546745,0.0010981199,0.00007672157,0.00010437656,0.000023337225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009514291,0.00016604061,0.4821748,0.00021677982,0.000054099874,0.0000054941133,0.0015435886,0.0017202784,0.0000020244472,0.4968521,0.00856349,0.008606168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038303755,0.000023276925,0.5887809,0.00002116405,0.000020578354,0.0000022887032,0.0029931867,0.0026440849,0.0000021984401,0.314756,0.09008864,0.00028463732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036246164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064139077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18209608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096291755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029457095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79581505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139603745","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2007.08.004","title":"Structure of causation and its influence on cooperation: A comparative study of forest management in Ontario, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Key (lock); Content analysis; Comparative case; Government (linguistics); Regional science; Political science; Business; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Economics; Sociology; Geography; Computer security","score_opus":0.01390187116596763,"score_gpt":0.23601297367775279,"score_spread":0.22211110251178515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139603745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99335635,0.0000035083824,8.0512893e-7,0.000040082814,0.000020909429,0.00037162402,0.00000903286,0.00000176669,0.0061959326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994489,0.000010761484,0.000024445235,0.00011629222,0.000012550166,0.0000032444482,0.0000072101675,0.0000035967907,0.00037302673],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993918,0.000010249591,0.00025009218,0.0001495533,0.000057237332,0.00014104496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997176,0.000028466597,0.00010224486,0.00010061097,0.0000046171326,0.000046453548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000084574094,0.00009524907,0.00014378414,0.00008875531,0.000044140015,0.0000101821415,0.00007564864,0.000026079191,0.00007103611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000555407,0.00009346212,0.000006696868,0.000098256605,0.00005386372,0.00013922507,0.00008992069,0.00005675941,0.0000021842802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007336381,0.000060018876,0.80765367,0.000015917367,0.000020500313,0.0000019855522,0.0033170807,0.16286898,0.000011464481,0.025651766,0.00013037543,0.00019488501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059436326,0.00019482103,0.9955157,0.000007666635,0.000007893643,7.7914785e-7,0.00024310974,0.0018081123,0.000059875572,0.0005179827,0.0009635251,0.00008618171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9157367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99917084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18786202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023893848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031355743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38112748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139824349","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2011.03.002","title":"Bilateral foreign direct investment in forest industry between the U.S. and Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign direct investment; Depreciation (economics); International economics; Exchange rate; Position (finance); Rest (music); Economics; Panel data; Business; Gross domestic product; Production (economics); Monetary economics; Volatility (finance); Capital (architecture); Capital formation; International trade; Human capital; Market economy; Macroeconomics; Financial capital; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.06912212519560815,"score_gpt":0.1996202131644677,"score_spread":0.13049808796885956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139824349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89553183,0.0002880023,0.0000024514318,0.0007373488,0.000115625924,0.00019259515,0.00027210198,0.0000105923555,0.102849446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969024,0.00051639555,0.00008096404,0.0019695624,0.00023659981,0.000026978869,0.000019193205,0.000024558614,0.00022331615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984905,0.000010740455,0.00061060704,0.000390488,0.0000119144315,0.0004857511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992339,0.000061133156,0.0002140046,0.00028934085,0.0000050673216,0.00019653243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003016214,0.00022177515,0.0004212869,0.00016627788,0.0001321857,0.00008363435,0.00023699788,0.00021647778,0.000033363594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040047682,0.0002158174,0.000047006513,0.00008526548,0.0001475428,0.00027864252,0.0001398287,0.0002727742,0.0000218985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066735347,0.000008849836,0.66030496,0.00000790585,0.000026357779,0.0000017100857,0.00019146272,0.00010131585,1.8998149e-8,0.33899814,0.00025077947,0.00010179554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004136135,0.000043929824,0.77359253,0.000007295439,0.0000054310817,0.000008158425,0.00011350452,0.00059044646,0.0000058495407,0.19477947,0.030193493,0.00024629766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6858417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67624944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14421868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002667059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012682556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88007784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165805055","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2006.12.002","title":"The development of government agency and stakeholder cooperation: A comparative study of two Local Citizens Committees' (LCCs) participation in forest management in Ontario, Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Stakeholder; Government (linguistics); Business; Comparative case; Key (lock); Public administration; Public relations; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.12700317826966362,"score_gpt":0.3935667103568456,"score_spread":0.266563532087182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165805055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951835,0.000025349595,0.00009869589,0.0001994781,0.00007256851,0.0011937562,0.0000072865055,0.0000021195929,0.0032171954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991872,0.000036200312,0.00022642384,0.00023026086,0.00001222525,0.00011689375,0.000010537042,0.000005228459,0.00017508045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983274,0.00011935363,0.0009834347,0.00012614187,0.00010079964,0.0003428887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906486,0.0004160466,0.00021864311,0.00016674754,0.000029632021,0.00010407222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010405615,0.00011030095,0.00025016326,0.00007017813,0.00038601697,0.0000070337655,0.00008953676,0.000037391063,0.000012092298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018223165,0.00009593945,0.0000066909797,0.00009498945,0.000055763903,0.00005790865,0.00016523078,0.00022717571,6.2417774e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020360977,0.00020786753,0.9065473,0.0000775709,0.000030645708,0.0000016404094,0.07468688,0.0018324802,2.1031535e-7,0.0124005005,0.00011249872,0.0038987678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020918248,0.000082320024,0.95419496,0.000052457704,0.000004530411,2.1464446e-7,0.039226815,0.0006986738,0.000003729473,0.0004977894,0.0030628685,0.000083800194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84325385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15667693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014072902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011968282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39122975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171105182","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2004.03.005","title":"A social choice approach to sustainable forest management: an analysis of multiple forest values in Northwestern Ontario","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Forest management; Monetization; Sustainable forest management; Stakeholder; Context (archaeology); Social preferences; Preference; Market value; Environmental resource management; Economics; Environmental economics; Geography; Microeconomics; Forestry","score_opus":0.052166662776112066,"score_gpt":0.23338398673120395,"score_spread":0.18121732395509188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171105182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881043,0.000032922315,0.0010562252,0.00011826943,0.000033084623,0.000427267,0.00008792597,0.000013256927,0.010126771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738276,0.000060554383,0.00089256087,0.00023379986,0.00010010786,0.00008062172,0.00024144683,0.000029285427,0.0009788662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998184,0.00000996191,0.0007525024,0.00055514195,0.000023040815,0.00047534803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992061,0.00002758186,0.00030614182,0.00031093313,0.000008734534,0.00014048268],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039397474,0.0002206389,0.00059561676,0.0010189017,0.00014622409,0.0000873911,0.00024760293,0.00012920678,0.000019148249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015500525,0.00029043094,0.00015225018,0.00034177018,0.000091124,0.0006166055,0.00016258954,0.000101426514,0.000035961533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016613085,0.0001300745,0.5391983,0.000022556667,0.0001199761,4.63946e-7,0.0027365717,0.24084695,6.514656e-8,0.2168753,0.0000031562597,0.000050015027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012436622,0.00008102583,0.93433434,0.0000041679086,0.00006140729,8.4242924e-7,0.0009639248,0.015539615,0.0000011197651,0.046140254,0.0013499272,0.00027969864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24538663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5717088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3951361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011026281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004087413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197834029","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2015.12.005","title":"Economic impacts of climate change considering individual, additive, and simultaneous changes in forest and agriculture sectors in Canada: A dynamic, multi-regional CGE model analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Computable general equilibrium; Economics; Climate change; Agriculture; Economic impact analysis; Natural resource economics; Welfare; Consumption (sociology); Economic sector; Agricultural economics; Macroeconomics; Economy; Geography; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07761489692890536,"score_gpt":0.255084000082238,"score_spread":0.17746910315333267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197834029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918109,0.0013959787,0.0000066651314,0.00088778866,0.00006976478,0.00032275036,0.0052154996,0.000010070206,0.0002805623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826537,0.016184904,0.0002143795,0.00055263296,0.00009663429,0.00005480266,0.00019861337,0.000033662047,0.000010699569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793094,0.000013495741,0.00079850265,0.0005792605,0.000021419024,0.00065640314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987209,0.00020453327,0.00051341264,0.00021296181,0.000015141411,0.00033307224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037749828,0.0003478523,0.0009862478,0.0009812735,0.000069328526,0.00008364565,0.000151303,0.0002005279,0.000011414659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010201022,0.00041051867,0.00006661907,0.00020785071,0.00015053098,0.00039107425,0.00023902205,0.00018429707,0.000003835019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006898916,0.00004635862,0.9186004,0.00010222897,0.00017547008,0.000007956622,0.004652992,0.055432886,6.4658e-7,0.020252086,0.000028169885,0.0006318431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016884705,0.000060901686,0.28819942,0.00003865142,0.000040015304,0.00002358676,0.0011052658,0.7025596,0.000004461408,0.0054268492,0.00035572372,0.0004970305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65003836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64712673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092929474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021237691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214523213","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.011","title":"Agenda-setting and framing of policy solutions for forest pests in Canada and Sweden: Avoiding beetle outbreaks?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning","keywords":"Framing (construction); Climate change; Outbreak; Political science; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental planning; Ecology; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.023847756789838553,"score_gpt":0.23905062720346554,"score_spread":0.21520287041362698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214523213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964309,0.000059296573,0.000095807045,0.0006661129,0.00006380924,0.00022854391,0.00004073368,0.000005689606,0.0024091569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869454,0.00011231825,0.0004981604,0.00042666847,0.00007914252,0.000026239282,0.000008771168,0.000010816718,0.00014333625],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991205,0.000018761833,0.00023234413,0.00021297981,0.0000324059,0.00038305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995182,0.00014263189,0.00009873612,0.00010331569,0.0000041481026,0.00013296338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003595454,0.00011369775,0.00017019147,0.000097056196,0.000190796,0.000022301394,0.00008304656,0.000059274465,0.00000669871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002256208,0.00012354534,0.00001637531,0.000075698554,0.00016094735,0.00019336434,0.0003001481,0.00007772332,0.0000019650547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000435071,0.00003186337,0.9026827,0.00007959454,0.000026381547,0.0000033351062,0.0022574975,0.024041088,0.000036585887,0.06373153,0.0017644486,0.005301441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096693594,0.000109446795,0.9260088,0.00001861278,0.000015365395,0.000024655285,0.0010546186,0.029970119,0.00002096101,0.034493282,0.007084842,0.00023233198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7942681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18738334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044765018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022062262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50380325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245330289","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.009","title":"Community forestry research in Canada: A bibliometric perspective","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"Nature; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; University of Winnipeg; University of Northern British Columbia","keywords":"Regional science; Citation; Geography; Library science; Political science; Social unrest; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.11503619201940657,"score_gpt":0.33003795442153705,"score_spread":0.21500176240213048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245330289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8097514,0.000034954737,5.654615e-7,0.0015066022,0.00004731572,0.00012384934,0.000010931752,0.0000068729373,0.18851751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979344,0.000115374496,0.000043432414,0.00040713392,0.000120030265,0.000015580095,0.0000054324064,0.000011706167,0.0013469096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894017,0.000120001096,0.00016804984,0.00017209284,0.00012362104,0.000476074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928814,0.00013021207,0.000039481456,0.0002783318,0.000011716532,0.00025210503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009463101,0.00010555351,0.00013480203,0.0035623577,0.00016287423,0.000059872567,0.000324432,0.000048597118,0.00007768097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002197507,0.000108217144,0.000017237364,0.0073925224,0.00023684501,0.00027744164,0.0005692281,0.0003507011,0.00025365612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033983226,0.000047977515,0.8851175,0.0000088789975,0.000008085241,0.000006175579,0.0013673838,0.005590714,2.8047512e-7,0.07463297,0.031144975,0.0020411091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006867533,0.0001159896,0.8243921,0.0000073946985,0.000002890344,0.000008800937,0.0021359841,0.006292264,0.0000031696668,0.09524361,0.07089372,0.00021733312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18818301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028740068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046230224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75154275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340282544","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2017.03.004","title":"A Collaborative Forest Management user group's perceptions and expectations on REDD + in Nepal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Perception; Forest management; User group; Forestry; Business; Geography; Environmental resource management; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.008261755647115383,"score_gpt":0.23894393401449746,"score_spread":0.23068217836738208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340282544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97674036,0.000008694378,0.0000037549137,0.0008211501,0.000040879848,0.00017923742,0.00002958931,0.000007709694,0.022168636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892735,0.00035571767,0.00020824991,0.00017643199,0.00007441874,0.000047973066,0.0000105696,0.0000075343532,0.00019177915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994609,0.000010326672,0.00012511993,0.00020599202,0.00002609135,0.0001715948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962354,0.000019171186,0.00006767369,0.00021391734,0.0000016479369,0.00007403938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000061092505,0.00009231128,0.000103681654,0.000052756077,0.00039343588,0.00016220765,0.00012182117,0.00004231684,0.000056567464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000064546084,0.00008277381,0.000015164886,0.000033629673,0.00005210392,0.0003839012,0.00015369883,0.000040762246,0.000116129726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033002518,0.00004966256,0.96551275,0.000017357777,0.000015566646,0.000004171614,0.0020039345,0.0028897754,0.0000022535992,0.028001133,0.00026728335,0.0012031115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046971822,0.000055757962,0.9825314,0.000016726037,0.0000064020905,0.000002631406,0.0010000222,0.0050041317,0.0000011710785,0.005140221,0.0056565045,0.000115293034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022131975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1283619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1261487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007484161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042825486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8875432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405074597","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.005","title":"Forest carbon mitigation policy: A policy gap analysis for British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Ministry of Forests; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Climate change mitigation; Business; Forest management; Natural resource economics; Carbon sequestration; Jurisdiction; Climate change; Environmental resource management; Carbon credit; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Economics; Ecology; Political science; Agroforestry","score_opus":0.009565432709236,"score_gpt":0.2181160460123342,"score_spread":0.2085506133030982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2405074597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96161276,0.000013865307,0.00010977047,0.0045689205,0.000056820616,0.00046018974,0.00025015575,0.0000602459,0.032867275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96803504,0.00033519138,0.00023287332,0.0012945501,0.0011528794,0.000114168186,0.00006343978,0.00004014373,0.028731707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982812,0.000026709195,0.0003916147,0.0005026805,0.0000865314,0.00071131147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901646,0.00011286803,0.00019281455,0.00038059737,0.000010727955,0.00028651571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022711154,0.00020203882,0.00033573175,0.0003210906,0.00027884074,0.00036354832,0.0002932553,0.00014572093,0.00033125043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022045146,0.00024432226,0.00021173696,0.0006532097,0.00038228626,0.00040210516,0.00025179016,0.00005453644,0.00013159412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027329408,0.000047371024,0.9352351,0.000024738778,0.00021567954,0.000001467785,0.00018606901,0.002030449,0.000025293946,0.038663108,0.009749797,0.013793624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012901986,0.00017759236,0.7148495,0.000022538505,0.00019358855,0.000012748425,0.0000139619,0.010613953,0.000013838704,0.113314435,0.1588991,0.0005985965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39508638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5765799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22038563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005183057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009638095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99631727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2421197543","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.004","title":"Forest Stewardship Council certification for forest ecosystem services: An analysis of stakeholder adaptability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"WWF International; Global Environment Facility","keywords":"Business; Stewardship (theology); Adaptability; Certified wood; Certification; Stakeholder; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem services; Forest management; Agriculture; Environmental planning; Forestry; Ecosystem; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Political science","score_opus":0.0738539134993477,"score_gpt":0.2450886375294424,"score_spread":0.1712347240300947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2421197543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945821,0.000010235204,0.00042723143,0.00074526016,0.000052093288,0.0005068055,0.0006025233,0.0000353001,0.003038452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853706,0.00007115292,0.00024228242,0.00021670244,0.00015745152,0.00007034899,0.00009625256,0.000025101508,0.00058363914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984359,0.000037381647,0.00051304017,0.0004899031,0.0001376162,0.00038615466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987273,0.00014115305,0.00030553047,0.0005688671,0.00003335945,0.00022377462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005747653,0.00021803795,0.00038023083,0.00013076667,0.00012765054,0.00006147944,0.00035872392,0.00010960395,0.00020923979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007373345,0.00017216525,0.00015081647,0.00027471624,0.00017408893,0.0006595812,0.00013560837,0.000036687725,0.00009118594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019172898,0.000101358244,0.91374904,0.00018222294,0.00023340504,1.9564976e-7,0.00091227394,0.025961129,0.00007935914,0.05529429,0.00039616352,0.0028988626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083120645,0.00028842746,0.71245605,0.000020672805,0.00040068978,8.5451256e-7,0.00012344109,0.19914009,0.00004125976,0.010345237,0.07595327,0.00039882422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057345172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17336275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20129299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000496673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064718384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86689126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621836884","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2017.06.001","title":"Carbon stocks and timber harvest. Alternative policy approaches for the Great Bear rainforest and their consequences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Temperate rainforest; Rainforest; Forest management; Business; Environmental resource management; Order (exchange); Natural resource economics; Carbon sequestration; Environmental planning; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.041564219633002136,"score_gpt":0.24859065370719907,"score_spread":0.20702643407419694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621836884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9482957,0.00008095427,0.000020563622,0.006722237,0.000055766144,0.000519413,0.00007825355,0.0000136869485,0.044213425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923997,0.0007003082,0.00010130253,0.00062795053,0.00047446328,0.000068129884,0.000007751162,0.000018475355,0.0056019463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991366,0.000014762149,0.0001649415,0.00029739764,0.00003540136,0.0003508726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991791,0.00015739925,0.0001668717,0.00035800086,0.0000032798569,0.00013535196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022976335,0.00021372578,0.00019007432,0.000064543085,0.000776212,0.00042179998,0.00032036362,0.00007238783,0.00002416737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011717936,0.00014681791,0.000041826075,0.000028894945,0.001904871,0.0004124602,0.0004647259,0.00008183664,0.000013098476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014389837,0.00002964852,0.4471684,0.00006814834,0.00019932214,0.000001829314,0.0060347677,0.0044526705,0.000007292527,0.4994654,0.0022338429,0.04019476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016806488,0.00028247526,0.5064493,0.000024760575,0.000061171064,0.000048007743,0.00030925585,0.15098858,0.00006652247,0.14497197,0.19445784,0.000659516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022344425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008065239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35449344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059327627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028255374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98416585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746016430","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2008.11.001","title":"","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02963413974395765,"score_gpt":0.23703743362129784,"score_spread":0.2074032938773402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746016430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99528176,0.000064703316,0.000013989297,0.0012335569,0.00006190122,0.00020826266,0.00016581577,0.0001795531,0.0027904524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597585,0.0007200378,0.00042332057,0.0015316544,0.0009503124,0.000032697782,0.000032909615,0.00009793391,0.00023531115],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818414,0.000030633528,0.00045900134,0.00046380106,0.00004202896,0.00082036166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872977,0.00012230476,0.00017990467,0.00047404948,0.000024775294,0.00046919784],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021986797,0.00030014417,0.0003807526,0.000386363,0.00064436666,0.00007000257,0.00025430022,0.00013045385,0.000005996962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019286646,0.00033234147,0.00010038261,0.00018153295,0.00061767333,0.00094045006,0.00019520929,0.00015162693,0.0004120941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021315781,0.00008301198,0.69791824,0.000011237081,0.000058937763,0.000018161238,0.0028692288,0.009864974,0.00008357613,0.2877729,0.00075020036,0.0003563806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023513779,0.00017812122,0.90726066,0.0000061446253,0.00001414801,0.0014149644,0.00011221685,0.007457693,0.0003388342,0.047833722,0.032454345,0.0005777658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004900728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005303491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23993918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023604346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023750383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2764077605","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.001","title":"Targeting climate change adaptation strategies to small-scale private forest owners","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Klima- und Energiefonds","keywords":"Forest management; Business; Incentive; Recreation; Environmental resource management; Climate change; Adaptability; Scale (ratio); Adaptation (eye); Private sector; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geography; Forestry; Ecology","score_opus":0.03482634114330573,"score_gpt":0.25382128279648974,"score_spread":0.218994941653184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2764077605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9538498,0.0000070231513,0.00007767115,0.0019535753,0.00012395253,0.00031592778,0.000022520127,0.00003516644,0.04361439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996377,0.00035507936,0.0011415043,0.00076000753,0.0005154867,0.000055096523,0.000022686701,0.00002351621,0.00074961834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897295,0.000010756646,0.00020068653,0.00028856818,0.000043716187,0.00048333197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992985,0.00001677117,0.00016751261,0.0003458502,0.0000029477435,0.00016838532],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019528177,0.0001714103,0.00014819455,0.00007425406,0.0006043694,0.00043600018,0.00035731477,0.00006394265,0.00010494854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037298778,0.00016541437,0.0000404732,0.000042474378,0.00017847479,0.00090620405,0.00054728595,0.000066343266,0.00083022076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008977943,0.000043628657,0.66296285,0.00006614766,0.000026395439,0.000004029526,0.006162565,0.0687972,0.00004418794,0.23744135,0.0022183463,0.022143511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056288636,0.00015747591,0.8016553,0.00002692526,0.000022119548,0.0000028892794,0.00032333776,0.06490606,0.00001574985,0.018298803,0.11348042,0.0005480623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076606143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017577274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21914254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008395721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009491881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771496933","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.002","title":"Timber market actors' values on forest legislation: A case study from Colombia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development","keywords":"Legislation; Forest management; Business; Variety (cybernetics); Forest ecology; Government (linguistics); Environmental resource management; Transparency (behavior); Deforestation (computer science); Poverty; Forest product; Forestry; Geography; Economics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.021566824286870626,"score_gpt":0.26691971832036315,"score_spread":0.24535289403349253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771496933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82836175,0.0000028501986,0.0000015474966,0.000509471,0.00014851383,0.00031180365,0.0000420595,0.0000229498,0.17059906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822996,0.00003096184,0.00007035751,0.00034161,0.000526875,0.000025471152,0.000012356656,0.00002191507,0.016670818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990271,0.00003024412,0.0002095772,0.0003582493,0.000065853,0.00030899042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989053,0.00008843062,0.00017674959,0.000676433,0.0000027288597,0.0001503704],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018975681,0.00019831592,0.00018891295,0.000058229463,0.00070506264,0.00036760964,0.0003172888,0.000076358396,0.0015199287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007150465,0.00019113453,0.000053044932,0.00003143687,0.00025891463,0.0005431185,0.00043558388,0.000098269324,0.0011088637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062014675,0.00013405,0.95860815,0.0000027524654,0.00004397854,0.00009943512,0.0011939456,0.0019766542,3.5382635e-7,0.0033402217,0.0327941,0.0017443337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009987478,0.000281345,0.88532746,0.0000064102956,0.000035920824,0.00003322476,0.000121841396,0.014770185,0.0000017106308,0.008285289,0.08983599,0.0003018702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05293529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057793625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15393789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116852396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013682164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782047073","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.009","title":"Reprint of: Why did the 1980s' reform of collective forestland tenure in southern China fail?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"China; Deforestation (computer science); Endogeneity; Natural resource economics; Liberalization; Economics; Forest protection; Panel data; Robustness (evolution); Business; Investment (military); Forest management; Geography; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Market economy; Econometrics; Political science","score_opus":0.008094727521075956,"score_gpt":0.21200773396159045,"score_spread":0.2039130064405145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782047073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9064151,0.000006941748,0.000007921757,0.0009361315,0.000031833784,0.0001915053,0.00002823076,0.000005394795,0.09237693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969639,0.000043669585,0.00005827734,0.00021042391,0.00012624609,0.000010643256,0.000003743573,0.0000107429405,0.0025723295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992611,0.00001860224,0.00026790242,0.00018304226,0.000046409532,0.0002229827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994684,0.0000285392,0.00016055975,0.00029264847,0.0000043184136,0.00004556106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024310754,0.00011146528,0.00016930969,0.00008262213,0.00008769713,0.000016487566,0.00020430394,0.000057871548,0.00020238258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003308645,0.0000786003,0.00004679311,0.00018280375,0.0005931266,0.000117397605,0.0002791243,0.000073053554,0.00009355059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002542834,0.00007675091,0.84753287,0.000038801893,0.000049632374,0.0000011069379,0.022943439,0.0022062454,0.00004047512,0.121511005,0.0034158158,0.0019295583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009659068,0.00037483033,0.8560208,0.00002947892,0.000018813727,0.0000072920016,0.0008026321,0.007996301,0.00025680376,0.10816198,0.025103675,0.00026148953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038322218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055181205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09054882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014829186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027390264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96808165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789392959","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.010","title":"Province specific impacts of the 2006 United States-Canada Softwood Lumber Agreement: A seemingly unrelated regression approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Seemingly unrelated regressions; Agricultural economics; Economics; Geography; Econometrics; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering","score_opus":0.008039863628337285,"score_gpt":0.1962651215858531,"score_spread":0.18822525795751582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789392959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94943273,0.000023414703,0.000010115119,0.00053285784,0.00009323684,0.00026656475,0.000060491184,0.0000119454335,0.04956867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913273,0.00014430135,0.00013199284,0.00065299514,0.0001780232,0.0000051619368,0.000047305974,0.000017900526,0.0074950526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896383,0.000031649757,0.0002741,0.0002492644,0.000101941514,0.0003791985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992525,0.00003087135,0.0002165429,0.00037179122,0.000007999296,0.0001203053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016065355,0.00017711127,0.00015298501,0.00006769021,0.00021136003,0.000039845763,0.00031105996,0.0000660037,0.0003016296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025445303,0.00012799595,0.000040704617,0.0003064178,0.0004383444,0.00017525924,0.0003665998,0.00010176431,0.00008868373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023418663,0.0002621914,0.513561,0.0001436902,0.00014150517,0.0000038073956,0.0031419722,0.022532476,0.00009727934,0.030600158,0.42402926,0.0052524577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001031384,0.00015995456,0.13812098,0.000059108377,0.000031180374,0.000012288328,0.000097867705,0.040443007,0.00031582502,0.002943051,0.8163543,0.00043110445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37860358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30270553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39232498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025067243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009296151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7100183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797248909","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102271","title":"Awareness and adoption of FireSmart Canada: Barriers and incentives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.006606704936461162,"score_gpt":0.18423872165015479,"score_spread":0.17763201671369364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797248909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99843293,0.000048757563,0.0000071511427,0.0008362691,0.00003393137,0.00008384102,0.000041627158,0.000004615481,0.0005108601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994474,0.00013436268,0.000028408826,0.00031736237,0.00004288411,0.00000302087,0.0000038933276,0.000005589899,0.000017083605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995944,0.000013860347,0.000108968256,0.00014927034,0.000023877008,0.00010960582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970114,0.000036141188,0.0000526892,0.000054435222,0.0000013112043,0.00015430244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000057704514,0.00006812449,0.00011712273,0.00001087405,0.000067774876,0.00001431121,0.000043113876,0.000030554544,0.000014022852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046271238,0.00006966407,0.0000075084886,0.000031271695,0.0001233209,0.00013347992,0.000098733486,0.00003052309,0.0000021987155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017900886,0.0000022460292,0.9960475,0.000049444865,0.000007936187,7.2787486e-7,0.0004988275,0.00033883133,0.00007050037,0.0009876019,0.00039840944,0.0015800616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003182277,0.00007218494,0.94554454,0.00001093435,0.0000071489626,0.000006064275,0.00017476974,0.041810118,0.00020241365,0.0002891445,0.0114310905,0.00013334535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3852505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46010062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07485012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063291925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005137659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61884314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810232392","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2018.06.005","title":"Critical success factors for small and medium forest enterprises: A review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Business; Livelihood; Enforcement; Forest management; Economics; Public economics; Environmental resource management; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.04465541112141748,"score_gpt":0.30142107048450517,"score_spread":0.2567656593630877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810232392","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004053409,0.9954564,0.00023346004,0.000087228924,0.00033262998,0.00072721095,0.00022684864,0.0000764747,0.0024544299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00014823872,0.99804866,0.00015553094,0.00013864062,0.00087621907,0.00017822765,0.00013341023,0.000090138536,0.00023093459],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866116,0.000019542334,0.00053662993,0.00034003065,0.000028446702,0.00041421692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989926,0.00040363596,0.00008953314,0.00028663117,0.00001568044,0.0002119151],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020904846,0.00042221832,0.0011757337,0.00019369977,0.00009629785,0.00012269418,0.00023257565,0.00023001678,0.000011190039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024189329,0.00034714883,0.00023048342,0.00005634962,0.00014515617,0.000060881204,0.00014871982,0.00015501853,0.000013070476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007979823,0.00004197907,0.00041202488,0.6290961,0.0008070613,0.000004974427,0.0005035231,0.00007474453,4.071653e-9,0.016495772,0.019913226,0.33264264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099377474,0.000053827243,0.000032340144,0.013239209,0.00045000343,0.000015440284,0.000012735297,0.00037257548,3.9898907e-8,0.00025846987,0.9851161,0.0003498743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004301789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014308121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96520287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007745937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049666392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2882991461","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2018.07.002","title":"Wrong premises mislead the conclusions by Kallio et al. on forest reference levels in the EU","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Forest management; Climate change; Natural resource economics; Stock (firearms); Economics; Environmental science; Business; Environmental resource management; Agricultural economics; Geography; Agroforestry; Ecology","score_opus":0.03426042877498799,"score_gpt":0.27987267211042943,"score_spread":0.24561224333544143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2882991461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78597337,0.000014689275,0.0000034978987,0.03011474,0.00004827808,0.0002510421,0.000050435916,0.000013105879,0.18353081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577216,0.00022796456,0.000024218036,0.038174815,0.00013326452,0.000030021654,0.000017739803,0.000013512164,0.0036568576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990185,0.00006331692,0.00020285002,0.00026846517,0.00007972095,0.00036712762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992486,0.0002049427,0.00008217846,0.00039438627,0.0000028874313,0.000066957815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042308244,0.00016622907,0.00011986765,0.000046828296,0.0003483346,0.00011119275,0.00054351956,0.000056780817,0.00040443306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069491616,0.00010434657,0.00003445479,0.00013370604,0.0005640672,0.00022153217,0.0003299495,0.00016695294,0.0008203714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052476353,0.000104330014,0.068903126,0.000007156225,0.000019097943,0.000001636302,0.003517249,0.0023465834,0.000030213812,0.3615466,0.56044286,0.003028632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027264812,0.0001389378,0.11358174,0.0000104770825,0.0000058791757,0.0000043518958,0.000075145406,0.002137494,0.000016521137,0.007070847,0.8765327,0.00015327963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054899855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018112227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35447577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008131935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020038367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886842683","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2018.07.018","title":"Crossing the science-policy interface: Lessons from a research project on Brazil nut management in Peru","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Department for International Development, UK Government","keywords":"Underpinning; Stakeholder; Stakeholder engagement; Discipline; Scope (computer science); Sustainability; Reductionism; Legitimacy; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Engineering; Social science; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.06715766073240889,"score_gpt":0.39410392144305384,"score_spread":0.3269462607106449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886842683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7993369,0.000010548353,0.0000037168645,0.005871159,0.00007802213,0.00036749343,0.00001495716,0.000017213148,0.19429998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99060684,0.00015698838,0.00017355607,0.0010529184,0.0006624502,0.000045047127,0.000003284449,0.000019036403,0.007279855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981939,0.00006216333,0.00023846597,0.00052364095,0.00018754703,0.0007942548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999199,0.000099841825,0.00006301601,0.0005233004,0.000007914869,0.000106944026],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010743042,0.00017313943,0.00013845925,0.00054806704,0.0011745263,0.00068616495,0.0007786668,0.000058689693,0.0002208253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010926807,0.00013476025,0.00003578402,0.0009527804,0.0039780503,0.00041968355,0.0011993201,0.00022983924,0.001427352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004038598,0.00034124465,0.04779362,0.000040919167,0.000070348724,0.000011574096,0.029844426,0.00552449,0.00014276986,0.74535525,0.054290615,0.116180904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010395936,0.0003378242,0.23256329,0.00006664694,0.0000100067755,0.0000044958374,0.00071594154,0.018061917,0.0002693066,0.05022722,0.6962669,0.00043688386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04385073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013477091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.695128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006423289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015413042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886886476","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2018.07.008","title":"Duration of U.S. forest products trade","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pacific Northwest Research Station; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Duration (music); Forest product; Economics; Product (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Balance of trade; Descriptive statistics; Gravity model of trade; Econometrics; Agricultural economics; Business; International trade; Statistics; Forest management; Geography; Forestry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012572718679826594,"score_gpt":0.2194090839975243,"score_spread":0.2068363653176977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886886476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9354632,0.0000063517887,0.00000923941,0.0019149272,0.00007302319,0.00013257447,0.0000080257205,0.000014207166,0.06237848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99674046,0.000072629424,0.0002829983,0.00038012548,0.0005103327,0.000005451534,0.000010867275,0.000010190172,0.00198696],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939203,0.000008255249,0.00019392671,0.00017373415,0.000034447537,0.00019758401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964666,0.000012893118,0.000094541974,0.00018531973,0.0000024215929,0.000058168767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010721364,0.0000914629,0.00010113032,0.000058141177,0.00008409933,0.000022703882,0.00011847908,0.000042102016,0.00024939142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004187559,0.00008813762,0.000022894415,0.00011366577,0.00036171597,0.00025989924,0.000106183885,0.000032158998,0.0003840119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008364785,0.000099109595,0.6014549,0.000067484,0.00003452484,7.594429e-7,0.0020276776,0.0017411031,0.00028166512,0.3427855,0.039875865,0.011547709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003949505,0.0002553476,0.62704474,0.0000068682575,0.000014675001,0.0000065055697,0.000013623056,0.006798355,0.0008511192,0.018575279,0.34582016,0.00021838308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013281868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025723667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32421023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004313717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013258099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49358243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888435947","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.004","title":"A spatial hedonic stumpage analysis of standing timber auctions in Jiangxi Province of China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Stumpage; Context (archaeology); Economics; China; Common value auction; Hedonic pricing; Econometrics; Geography; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04641016141318832,"score_gpt":0.23488306701168757,"score_spread":0.18847290559849925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888435947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891586,0.00009746417,0.0012239862,0.00012214931,0.000075819094,0.00012983262,0.0002913524,0.00000485178,0.008895946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893266,0.00033117153,0.0002545582,0.000033573408,0.00010357707,0.000007729639,0.00003091951,0.0000119645165,0.00029385273],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988777,0.000008868346,0.0006630082,0.00025379352,0.000011302276,0.00018532279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992863,0.000027956181,0.00041873677,0.00021379025,0.000005070184,0.000048162332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032868996,0.000105828745,0.00043740054,0.0006424604,0.00005077588,0.000015476637,0.00009911869,0.000075067255,0.00024457293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036309946,0.0001327902,0.000101871796,0.00022081516,0.00019506867,0.0002202114,0.000065016335,0.000056948327,0.000033860033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020746053,0.0000723,0.84212226,0.000017018483,0.00017326497,1.4179678e-7,0.00061087945,0.008204911,0.000004745651,0.14840814,0.000018733808,0.00034684382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043687611,0.0001294069,0.92027193,0.0000075127937,0.00004070247,7.7737724e-7,0.000060526076,0.062158816,0.000051968294,0.016025633,0.00068276044,0.0001330963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058834995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0107475305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13238251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020782872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033659508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.889413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888748208","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2018.07.016","title":"Timber selling policies using bundle-based auction: The case of public forests in Québec","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Common value auction; Revenue; Bidding; Government (linguistics); Business; Bundle; Relocation; Process (computing); Scale (ratio); Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Industrial organization; Economics; Finance; Microeconomics; Computer science; Marketing; Geography","score_opus":0.16508107058548946,"score_gpt":0.38942229771245157,"score_spread":0.2243412271269621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888748208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98630536,0.000026599295,0.008301049,0.0038832023,0.00007824586,0.000109221284,0.000019802734,0.00001046717,0.0012660795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986058,0.0000067686424,0.00027507337,0.00033138046,0.0004369963,0.000009164258,0.000001220946,0.000007861567,0.00032573126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990212,0.000075268494,0.00044682564,0.0002075299,0.00005141375,0.00019778337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863,0.0005978828,0.00023342398,0.00037563214,0.00008848249,0.00007461719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011462006,0.0000910094,0.0001534776,0.00028308725,0.00039912437,0.00013752986,0.00023360348,0.000060721628,0.00008744336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039582196,0.000066009045,0.000054574062,0.00043987788,0.00064835657,0.00027433524,0.0000641151,0.00007331468,0.00004282948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043668733,0.000103596714,0.085810356,0.0000071842087,0.0000193918,0.0000024769001,0.0025750988,0.07446192,0.0000142849985,0.82928383,0.00045709062,0.0072210706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005731309,0.000113947426,0.017703593,0.0000130349335,0.000015695887,0.00054916024,0.0024564841,0.393464,0.00050046615,0.5270381,0.05731167,0.0002606983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02050179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17941846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3190021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007140199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029282464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98602074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891549531","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2018.09.007","title":"Comparison of revealed comparative advantage indexes with application to trade tendencies of cellulose production from planted forests in Brazil, Canada, China, Sweden, Finland and the United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative advantage; Revealed comparative advantage; China; Balance of trade; Index (typography); Disadvantage; Balance (ability); Geography; Agricultural economics; Economy; Economics; Business; International trade; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.01480272530442695,"score_gpt":0.2536986729039381,"score_spread":0.23889594759951116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891549531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979183,0.000037189253,0.000078877936,0.0012324009,0.000027179989,0.0003248401,0.000055261145,0.000004761423,0.00032117285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994483,0.00002265786,0.000025523688,0.00021301712,0.00015188729,0.000010770272,0.00010785208,0.0000055260184,0.000014455361],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994295,0.000012062612,0.00023586267,0.00015747384,0.000046063884,0.00011901088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958193,0.00006021127,0.00021039745,0.00010327329,0.000031157168,0.000013056873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008998304,0.00010578848,0.0002663577,0.00013110816,0.00006530401,0.000032072778,0.00009221469,0.000026558075,0.0000021260657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017227096,0.00007685157,0.000010147533,0.00021071815,0.00020594298,0.00017923865,0.000044029166,0.000050787723,7.1908994e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008015016,0.000043124903,0.96712214,0.00007514241,0.000029446679,2.481221e-7,0.0013765787,0.0041836365,0.000046259272,0.026028585,0.00019143375,0.00010192459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088273396,0.000039670114,0.97433376,0.00006893379,0.000021293745,9.837008e-7,0.0012711636,0.01628333,0.00062033033,0.0039485083,0.0024242846,0.00010499109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4711479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8246298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35348186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023604325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042470503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5323738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916560109","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.014","title":"Determining the effectiveness of forest landscape governance: A case study from the Sendang landscape, South Sumatra","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Oil Palm Production and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Corporate governance; Audit; Business; Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Christian ministry; Law enforcement; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Economics; Accounting; Political science; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.007254107713123098,"score_gpt":0.22259623546993046,"score_spread":0.21534212775680736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916560109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99753606,0.000015477275,0.00000289887,0.000121796395,0.00010106623,0.0004563337,0.00004462288,0.000009318189,0.0017124433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997057,0.000010331607,0.000008674475,0.00006619482,0.000098438766,0.000016570824,0.0000039174442,0.000009911968,0.00008029535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991915,0.00013640053,0.00017627573,0.00025794748,0.000054049367,0.00018380457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904567,0.0004203215,0.0001069263,0.00037735736,0.0000068494824,0.000042882064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066214893,0.00011472955,0.000165489,0.0000107298,0.00017059213,0.0000461096,0.00016609905,0.00003864637,0.00008250309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010732531,0.00007000676,0.000048252972,0.00007630842,0.00013662175,0.00014223592,0.0001828507,0.00010269734,0.00003082806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005345727,0.0000483417,0.9919914,0.000013720108,0.000016217158,0.0000038276617,0.002993218,0.0036194606,0.0000012324972,0.00035753485,0.000028299317,0.000873274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006988161,0.00009563121,0.99022776,0.0000048610887,0.000015550848,0.000028230575,0.005487414,0.0018114625,0.000008123663,0.0010378725,0.00049261155,0.000091655325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006345799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007371629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024941962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005720524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023695226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9592992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924651880","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2019.03.004","title":"Technical change and productivity growth in the Alberta logging industry","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Logging; Productivity; Technical change; Incentive; Production (economics); Natural resource economics; Forest management; Total factor productivity; Forest industry; Technical progress; Business; Agricultural economics; Economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Forestry; Agroforestry; Economic growth; Geography; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07182188579965727,"score_gpt":0.2279499264791513,"score_spread":0.15612804067949404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924651880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95649976,0.0002948033,0.0000033056283,0.0074137705,0.00013827105,0.00034455868,0.00005016257,0.000011168506,0.035244208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969067,0.00060601847,0.000059993272,0.0017607468,0.00035754094,0.00003203161,0.000008793742,0.000017205934,0.00025096876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879307,0.000011416442,0.00037634472,0.00044004162,0.000009248293,0.00036986658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939084,0.00009322299,0.00015276576,0.00028298123,0.0000038402754,0.00007634751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004982125,0.00016604294,0.00033375173,0.00019410426,0.00007259116,0.00011864634,0.00021954336,0.00024993048,0.000024962463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008895211,0.00016648814,0.000046011213,0.0001112361,0.000099639175,0.00049944967,0.0001228962,0.0003510291,0.00015167582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065872614,0.00002247496,0.49083772,0.000020615082,0.0000052462174,3.9673978e-7,0.00029677345,0.000021358692,3.8009549e-7,0.50857556,0.000053099393,0.00015977619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005838265,0.00007732476,0.7765684,0.000013127775,0.0000036666188,0.00006109947,0.00013867528,0.0015651318,0.0000048214256,0.1764955,0.044164713,0.00032366757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069550117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029153703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33208007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000888446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001813146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935686593","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.004","title":"Assessing the potential of community-based forestry programs in Panama","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Sustainability; Panama; Business; Government (linguistics); Agriculture; Poverty; Environmental resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Community forestry; Environmental planning; Forest management; Forestry; Natural resource economics; Economic growth; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Computer science","score_opus":0.030592355793031056,"score_gpt":0.23375860115135427,"score_spread":0.20316624535832323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935686593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954224,0.000003050956,0.000020230695,0.0009710339,0.00002868542,0.00016012453,0.0000029000041,0.000005382008,0.0033861678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992497,0.000008746582,0.00007605122,0.0005101913,0.00001696053,0.000002503996,0.00001346436,0.0000032082387,0.00011918805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961215,0.00004242282,0.00011645987,0.00006935767,0.000034090812,0.00012554237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996937,0.000034923793,0.00006651295,0.00017794422,0.0000018883611,0.000025036104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024314244,0.00005772586,0.00007624491,0.000035879366,0.00013655878,0.000053722815,0.0001721627,0.00003491393,0.000036072688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000060767334,0.000046020035,0.00002921045,0.00007064065,0.00017206784,0.00011119921,0.00020872105,0.00008732064,0.000020983054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057698644,0.00004119656,0.98166794,0.000017522181,0.0000042030183,1.8153345e-7,0.0003831613,0.013822436,0.000008979714,0.00023678622,0.00001637372,0.0037954415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029527207,0.000032584467,0.9822816,0.0000065296294,0.0000052309865,5.8079246e-7,0.001138157,0.009434562,0.000006747521,0.0013538622,0.005389449,0.00005541099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076514636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024211672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005373075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055325956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012694094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938706799","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.005","title":"Identifying local actors of deforestation and forest degradation in the Kalasha valleys of Pakistan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Higher Education Commission, Pakistan; University of Alberta; Higher Education Commision, Pakistan; Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University","keywords":"Deforestation (computer science); Livelihood; Reforestation; Government (linguistics); Forest protection; Logging; Business; Incentive; Indigenous; Forest management; Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation; Ecoforestry; Clearing; Community forestry; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Forest restoration; Geography; Forestry; Climate change; Forest ecology; Economics; Finance; Ecology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.012203071448700082,"score_gpt":0.22081276520186396,"score_spread":0.20860969375316388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938706799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976018,0.000010115241,0.00016613283,0.00019906767,0.000019715319,0.00015724315,0.0000064647306,0.0000021690635,0.0018373121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996309,0.0001044843,0.000072611576,0.00007323634,0.0000084802,0.0000016059355,0.000013373835,0.000002601064,0.00009269168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995796,0.000018443492,0.00016048895,0.00010638884,0.00004697018,0.00008810669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997293,0.000050828683,0.00010104851,0.0000961063,0.0000029770601,0.000019749577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019306784,0.00005514026,0.000079723344,0.000061526654,0.00004533986,0.00001829179,0.000088296496,0.000030286754,0.000022585806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009117741,0.000045004406,0.000018914414,0.000073096024,0.00014089416,0.0001365838,0.00009417858,0.000030412562,0.000006341955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012420048,0.000015282894,0.98830765,0.000030446212,0.0000045736383,1.099336e-7,0.0016001473,0.0041346354,0.00001606547,0.0043328214,0.000013844692,0.0015320026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025110293,0.00003767013,0.98819613,0.0000078389585,0.0000070353567,8.027742e-7,0.0019790337,0.0051404308,0.000024014937,0.003448584,0.0008597615,0.000047612582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006504303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013718363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00721406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005002888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007159096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98326033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943895771","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.003","title":"New frontiers of forest economics, III: Governing our forests: The evolving political economy of multiple values and multiple stakeholders","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"Government of Canada; University of Toronto; George Mason University","keywords":"Politics; Economics; Natural resource economics; Economic system; Economy; Forestry; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.01792689815176917,"score_gpt":0.2146826349035046,"score_spread":0.1967557367517354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943895771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971126,0.0000920183,0.00010366461,0.0013386792,0.00015024154,0.0004236231,0.000059798727,0.0000149699035,0.026690988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678653,0.00010815842,0.00079531583,0.0003956599,0.00019692056,0.000005694393,0.00001795838,0.00003226146,0.0016615023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985107,0.00002618252,0.00049859105,0.00036689764,0.00005064091,0.00054697064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886274,0.00018456148,0.00031560098,0.000397356,0.000006930585,0.00023280528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002591573,0.00024880885,0.0003947896,0.00011269507,0.00012294765,0.00007679896,0.00034736606,0.00010657947,0.000073188545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009453683,0.00022241983,0.00011208468,0.00007175291,0.00030593184,0.00059070723,0.0004295979,0.00012540461,0.000060920655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055325814,0.000018075942,0.9174168,0.00004032553,0.000051056253,1.7497045e-7,0.000565316,0.0094554145,0.0000040214904,0.06530811,0.0064836983,0.0006016494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029889492,0.00025218545,0.6963098,0.000034340093,0.000071342714,0.000008187163,0.0020338467,0.18850833,0.00010350464,0.07739175,0.03172772,0.00057006296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012965895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00573171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22110705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018670864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006245347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99360687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946321719","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.006","title":"Managing forests for the greater good: The role of the social license to operate","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"License; Business; Recreation; Forest management; Certified wood; Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Public relations; Marketing; Economics; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.008487875190683208,"score_gpt":0.22259575391659095,"score_spread":0.21410787872590775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946321719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96270615,0.000011604571,0.000006325148,0.010269472,0.000092018134,0.00066289486,0.000021996522,0.000006485476,0.026223049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98937297,0.000023878816,0.000018258368,0.0023367517,0.00024641713,0.00004436837,0.0000015861473,0.000014411393,0.007941351],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993705,0.00001646793,0.00014329057,0.0001553284,0.000043283213,0.00027110992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953806,0.00007028648,0.00006742035,0.00028562793,0.0000029588487,0.000035655336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020354471,0.00010768435,0.00010095352,0.000023570185,0.0003462676,0.00007088977,0.000438606,0.000034667682,0.00015067842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012490928,0.000055589633,0.000078291516,0.00009158046,0.0001570672,0.00011119959,0.00043755223,0.000056525994,0.00030159843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001384795,0.000026172354,0.5147444,0.00002975281,0.000095187665,1.2313971e-7,0.011053284,0.03984612,0.00007441591,0.4035438,0.013048297,0.017399937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040595807,0.000066334724,0.46471626,0.0000068984095,0.000034491153,0.0000022173394,0.00036348565,0.027102755,0.00013759224,0.016722685,0.490264,0.0001773311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022871383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030645905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4772157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045763456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009766944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3876538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946824746","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.008","title":"The effect of institutional arrangements on economic performance among first nations: Evidence from forestry in BC","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Corporate governance; Socioeconomic status; Politics; Work (physics); Panel data; Political science; Economics; Business; Finance; Sociology; Ecology; Law","score_opus":0.00686552414006417,"score_gpt":0.1973152281655477,"score_spread":0.19044970402548353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946824746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990753,0.00009839706,0.0000047479202,0.00006135167,0.00018141941,0.00017487393,0.000011313165,0.000013183864,0.008701707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998674,0.0010542376,0.000009976192,0.0000078377625,0.000095356605,0.000028456792,0.000006550818,0.00000799391,0.00011560158],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995731,0.000007422015,0.00016694433,0.00010125995,0.000023643439,0.00012763444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994705,0.00032096493,0.000037175363,0.00014543944,0.0000017358103,0.000024184254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013971463,0.000085858504,0.00010699003,0.000105313964,0.00008677632,0.00002758897,0.0001170753,0.000038587677,0.000010086056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002838628,0.00006827555,0.000024832769,0.000030934883,0.00007162678,0.00011235865,0.000036392237,0.00006626252,0.000059090355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018594492,0.0000016513153,0.4199997,0.000058784135,0.000018319286,9.131202e-8,0.00010075558,0.57632565,4.0688076e-7,0.002402849,0.000033790995,0.0010394402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049655075,0.000110317436,0.6280779,0.00027886478,0.0000059990675,3.2786926e-7,0.000027828662,0.3653302,0.00013266796,0.00008467173,0.005349338,0.00010531786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074982236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002343998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21099545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012047376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011640124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27841958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004526512","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102111","title":"Small-scale private forest ownership: Understanding female and male forest owners' climate change adaptation behaviour","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Klima- und Energiefonds","keywords":"Climate change; Forest management; Scale (ratio); Adaptation (eye); Environmental resource management; Business; Perception; Geography; Duration (music); Forestry; Ecology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.09169671649451216,"score_gpt":0.239355083755029,"score_spread":0.14765836726051684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004526512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808031,0.00003183218,0.00022385758,0.003583525,0.00007387876,0.00046977357,0.00006610608,0.00006311974,0.014684863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955742,0.00072787754,0.00058351696,0.0018420176,0.00045012296,0.00004333174,0.00007074081,0.00004324399,0.0006649579],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849415,0.000026802267,0.00030653595,0.00048309693,0.000075660704,0.00061378075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992153,0.0000451696,0.0001691991,0.00020767431,0.0000030261242,0.0003596396],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018278814,0.00027270213,0.00025067106,0.000101432764,0.0003234033,0.00018425313,0.00021338831,0.00012403542,0.00024258887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027352371,0.0002680196,0.000066853,0.00017094969,0.0002947313,0.0006233821,0.00047009502,0.00014076375,0.0002952342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007098408,0.00002545857,0.9106895,0.000062761166,0.000015422575,0.000005516338,0.0039137034,0.0034834275,0.000005339635,0.07990874,0.0005178936,0.0013012977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021687094,0.00057724846,0.79563195,0.000060078037,0.00013477604,0.000038285736,0.0016000421,0.1581266,0.000017869399,0.014665876,0.025823724,0.0011548646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022872097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015116787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15464316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001879131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010895977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009305669","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102123","title":"Governance of forests and governance of forest information: Interlinkages in the age of open and digital data","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Corporate governance; Transparency (behavior); Business; Openness to experience; Forest management; Environmental resource management; Open data; Information governance; Accounting; Political science; Information system; Economics; Forestry; Geography; Finance; Management information systems","score_opus":0.029361935488260514,"score_gpt":0.237112023857003,"score_spread":0.20775008836874248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009305669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930236,0.000100259094,0.0000026688324,0.0055267597,0.0000072427424,0.00018594271,0.00051136914,0.0000013167618,0.00064086955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892855,0.0005086229,0.000044306886,0.00040842188,0.000025355223,0.000003494108,0.00006985935,3.6322461e-7,0.0000110355295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994593,0.000009528135,0.0002964576,0.00011834741,0.000026038835,0.000090304144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995861,0.00011956063,0.00018016712,0.000072332135,0.000012760624,0.00002906598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015528142,0.00006741188,0.00017650475,0.000004427503,0.000027747461,0.00009727521,0.00041979266,0.000038889706,0.0000027562114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001254208,0.00003043485,0.000013016879,0.00005941998,0.00018330629,0.0011210124,0.00056363863,0.000043592117,2.1138553e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008487988,0.000028468115,0.8503521,0.00013711497,0.000012216271,5.2244474e-7,0.0017013749,0.000019319532,0.0000068904833,0.09564913,0.00016345808,0.05184452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019053122,0.00013558863,0.9688774,0.000017531449,0.0000020664443,0.000002444095,0.0006906214,0.0003291646,0.000023564642,0.004826759,0.024843868,0.000060456623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012023497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006558945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1185253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009111648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023311999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36600453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013439833","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102525","title":"Do protectionist trade policies integrate domestic markets? Evidence from the Canada-U.S. softwood lumber dispute","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Protectionism; Domestic market; Free trade; Economics; International economics; International trade; Commercial policy; Market integration; Trade barrier; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.012284932790924413,"score_gpt":0.22271697039749905,"score_spread":0.21043203760657464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013439833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689667,0.00016365544,0.000023912111,0.019360136,0.00018454874,0.00021018584,0.00008623608,0.000023359287,0.010981226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99139273,0.00072289765,0.00012002934,0.0027265283,0.00045728876,0.000038240203,0.00001956631,0.000019277071,0.0045034355],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891025,0.00005781174,0.00023153683,0.00033244086,0.00008694504,0.00038103812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915683,0.0002270936,0.00009191383,0.00038296357,0.0000034109949,0.00013781183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015469766,0.00018986405,0.00016420073,0.000021164029,0.00040020252,0.00028627706,0.00028984476,0.00005662676,0.0007085629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016620925,0.00015082679,0.000055951623,0.00018577921,0.00029334496,0.00029395477,0.0003134487,0.00015907602,0.00013290952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011219102,0.00009120542,0.72970676,0.000057621623,0.00020496572,0.00004559073,0.0025453973,0.008396459,0.000065490676,0.042819317,0.19113496,0.024820058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002221214,0.000023393912,0.71338266,0.000040840772,0.000035444995,0.00003559394,0.000108926906,0.0031400016,0.000045596124,0.008551672,0.27412772,0.0002860468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7683844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8829752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11459081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031193727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018957385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7758267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019709712","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102177","title":"Scaling up forest landscape restoration in Canada in an era of cumulative effects and climate change","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Office of Energy Research and Development","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Climate change; Forest restoration; Livelihood; Natural resource; Geography; Cumulative effects; Business; Environmental planning; Sustainable development; Restoration ecology; Natural capital; Natural resource economics; Forest ecology; Ecosystem; Agriculture; Political science; Environmental science; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.015663920957259568,"score_gpt":0.2215487321176339,"score_spread":0.20588481116037433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019709712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990692,0.000032073138,0.0000017639401,0.00036026232,0.000050463444,0.00027802796,0.000023045739,0.000004291177,0.00018087027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948335,0.000075070435,0.000032373868,0.0003009429,0.0000686541,0.000018071858,0.000011158722,0.00000955186,8.2877506e-7],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934685,0.000041174782,0.00019655349,0.00018895137,0.000033583678,0.00019291391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963826,0.000098403354,0.00008250916,0.00007646865,0.0000015074643,0.00010282922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001319746,0.00009132154,0.00017937487,0.00003375974,0.000028469061,0.00001620463,0.000059680653,0.000041246592,0.000004691779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000512534,0.00009609246,0.000008286088,0.00009228718,0.00003421922,0.0003518165,0.00007444082,0.00008034974,0.0000033316203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003516722,0.0000061260225,0.9872803,0.00007148526,0.0000013541492,0.000002602587,0.0016921947,0.0072684977,0.000019465837,0.00042819657,0.0000111154195,0.0031834564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036553593,0.000063571366,0.7121172,0.000027421125,0.000001412974,0.0000010567372,0.000059742804,0.28706357,0.000032516862,0.00014026657,0.000053408246,0.00007433361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75957006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9854025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27979508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020678931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035188747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3918537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024431746","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102203","title":"Justice-related impacts and social differentiation dynamics in Nepal's REDD+ projects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; World Bank Group; Department for International Development; Department for International Development, UK Government; Economic and Social Research Council; Network for Business Sustainability; United Nations","keywords":"Livelihood; Indigenous; Deforestation (computer science); Political science; Dominance (genetics); Corporate governance; Politics; Economic growth; Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Business; Geography; Climate change; Agriculture; Economics; Ecology; Carbon stock","score_opus":0.021624204701456765,"score_gpt":0.21059077193415385,"score_spread":0.18896656723269709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024431746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900725,0.000008272666,0.000012107649,0.0064730817,0.000026539528,0.00014231149,0.00001619583,0.0000139525055,0.003235044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987543,0.00014027097,0.000033262495,0.00086701085,0.000055883233,0.0000017808412,0.00003187006,0.0000045102033,0.0001110594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951893,0.000013546713,0.00012188982,0.00016863015,0.00002901317,0.00014799218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998205,0.000013511495,0.000058675305,0.000042469797,0.0000015212398,0.00006336885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000055403663,0.000078282865,0.0000890171,0.00004097182,0.00014897122,0.000048088477,0.000058924557,0.000057971338,0.000028807426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001930463,0.00008061477,0.000017039776,0.00008029759,0.00008709593,0.0001205738,0.00019148712,0.000057793717,0.000019929452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025101317,0.000018471059,0.98995346,0.00004736969,0.0000102711365,0.0000010867981,0.0044204774,0.0005546265,0.000007381596,0.0026459347,0.00017550224,0.0021403255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042626465,0.000031830816,0.8963999,0.0000027951196,0.000020223519,8.0340004e-7,0.0007773095,0.09984644,0.0000017677712,0.00080441654,0.0015929424,0.00009528194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012793326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004464518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09929181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018272606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000090860385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3287375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036758628","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102204","title":"Local-level emergence of network governance within the U.S. Forest Service: A case study of mountain pine beetle outbreak from Colorado, USA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mountain pine beetle; Outbreak; Geography; Corporate governance; Forestry; Ecology; Business; Finance; Biology","score_opus":0.022234876430405576,"score_gpt":0.23131157509054442,"score_spread":0.20907669866013884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036758628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975958,0.000032560652,0.00020139839,0.00084298826,0.00009418164,0.00044651824,0.00011293449,0.000008085542,0.0006655537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977941,0.00006929726,0.00019064544,0.0017296588,0.00010050597,0.000032027612,0.000007731819,0.000013256957,0.00006276502],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989352,0.000042411146,0.0004249738,0.00029068632,0.00006851102,0.00023817531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918526,0.000082229984,0.000334955,0.000288697,0.000008139348,0.00010072971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019418332,0.00016018961,0.00026698734,0.000012377882,0.00015843373,0.000011901594,0.00033368473,0.00006816706,0.000275076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000328366,0.00013374255,0.000037391226,0.00022682722,0.00028106506,0.00015369616,0.00053740136,0.00011340442,0.000050332354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014193404,0.00018476909,0.39683086,0.000027824637,0.00008522272,0.000037741345,0.004802369,0.58369154,0.000010960916,0.012024874,0.0017678736,0.00039406563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012812442,0.0008737958,0.8664895,0.000012631739,0.00008200086,0.00004374327,0.005011303,0.11617947,0.00003598019,0.0077331774,0.0019796074,0.00027753643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100965805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4516876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46965864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054442076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029964664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90502095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081615206","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102295","title":"How effective are forests in mitigating climate change?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Damages; Climate change; Investment (military); Natural resource economics; Tree planting; Dice; Sink (geography); Afforestation; Forestry; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Economics; Geography; Ecology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017980433668781434,"score_gpt":0.22286627475923007,"score_spread":0.20488584109044863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081615206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774364,0.000020796706,0.0000038078456,0.0107031055,0.00003428539,0.00036188515,0.000021521355,0.0000276727,0.011390498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961849,0.00015272842,0.000089954345,0.0029173424,0.00043225082,0.000065702996,0.000007973369,0.000017387229,0.00013179099],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991739,0.00001960566,0.00012764633,0.0002637891,0.00003461689,0.00038047822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961025,0.000039927887,0.00009139016,0.00010620316,0.0000011740353,0.00015106781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000089786474,0.00014320947,0.00016516958,0.000055146287,0.00008556568,0.00009583096,0.00013487451,0.000057435802,0.000052350515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006696213,0.0001464177,0.000038379654,0.00014694183,0.000115961215,0.0004581088,0.00030322882,0.00009383574,0.00027830276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021858212,0.0000112148655,0.973076,0.00004680569,0.0000055700793,0.00000504894,0.0014121272,0.0010155662,0.0000041207986,0.015498776,0.00069696986,0.008205954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005914216,0.0001023122,0.93629086,0.000023454588,0.00000685514,0.0000024521057,0.00008700851,0.03047577,0.0000247176,0.0045538316,0.027583983,0.00025735836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010933965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006550844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03678515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008463646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031727718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59707403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082043594","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102272","title":"How communities restructured forest tenure throughout the top-down devolution reform: Using the case of Fujian, China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Devolution (biology); China; Business; Geography; Agricultural economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02803433265364966,"score_gpt":0.22775746753378923,"score_spread":0.19972313488013957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082043594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836786,0.000041364907,0.00009072622,0.014684765,0.000038567036,0.00018806827,0.000051646042,0.000010158083,0.0012161253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986514,0.00009678372,0.00011811577,0.00088531675,0.000120896395,0.0000019382176,0.000013257854,0.000005647525,0.00010667325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953985,0.000038033104,0.0001237964,0.00010492559,0.00003838656,0.00015498248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956065,0.000025642099,0.000114210095,0.0002482445,0.000004730706,0.000046497014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010618032,0.00010103278,0.00010184131,0.000019178395,0.00067698996,0.00008188864,0.00021394035,0.00004646325,0.000021268157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018648401,0.000061285566,0.000045938064,0.00009518185,0.0004867386,0.00016760304,0.00042173485,0.00010003374,0.0000028561747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007250982,0.000023043309,0.9349081,0.000048511287,0.00006721649,0.0000091249085,0.02304236,0.027081251,0.00001819543,0.011680196,0.0005737603,0.0024757683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003760116,0.000069755486,0.8986772,0.000006433349,0.000054827957,0.00007474228,0.016572863,0.04451635,0.000014301403,0.005077298,0.03439601,0.00016423731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03522539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023656558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036230896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011949994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012951912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99415916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180771768","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102557","title":"Mexican community forest enterprises as social firms: Organizational differences and the factors that shape them","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation","keywords":"Business; Citizen journalism; Productivity; Political science; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.04087187529073213,"score_gpt":0.2516651456238352,"score_spread":0.21079327033310305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180771768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98836374,0.000038117727,0.0000037342816,0.003417471,0.000093253475,0.00011524413,0.000037005393,0.000028754475,0.007902661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730194,0.00013595706,0.0000027022586,0.0017904564,0.00060001743,0.0000033464273,0.00007046375,0.000013023087,0.00008208063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936897,0.000040863048,0.00015873894,0.00013804005,0.000055571894,0.00023783716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947095,0.00021365787,0.00011278544,0.00011805183,0.00005937489,0.000025163812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018475161,0.00015594628,0.00022850273,0.000039326213,0.001084773,0.0006181346,0.00018010098,0.000079856305,0.00006940676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041537633,0.00011495338,0.00006942921,0.00012050984,0.00046173137,0.00046763968,0.00027766972,0.00015245086,0.0000067567253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022093649,0.000035929756,0.7356245,0.00003286564,0.00003269096,4.0665228e-7,0.002609054,0.0000029340213,9.3118864e-8,0.26143354,0.00006709387,0.00013877975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040814423,0.000004884941,0.72461635,0.000004645867,0.00003139912,0.0000016236727,0.015527083,0.00020815627,0.0000010779614,0.25809157,0.0009968061,0.0001082823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012828653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059239664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012918029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004754666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081833394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187878935","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102566","title":"Forests, trees and poverty alleviation: Policy implications of current knowledge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Sustainability; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Business; Sustainable development; Community forestry; Economic growth; Environmental planning; Forest management; Political science; Economics; Geography; Forestry; Ecology","score_opus":0.024064017367476105,"score_gpt":0.250828729508453,"score_spread":0.22676471214097688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187878935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98028874,0.00032229337,0.00008188041,0.0049829474,0.000034486868,0.00009633224,0.000055484972,0.0000096833755,0.0141281355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99620277,0.0019724185,0.00008999423,0.00041315067,0.00012547857,0.0000055407813,0.00003374918,0.0000047881845,0.0011521014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994898,0.000014186882,0.00015084087,0.00018553199,0.000025771385,0.0001338603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996389,0.00003437359,0.00006973557,0.0001656269,0.000009067979,0.00008229372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000062914296,0.00008065346,0.0001038864,0.000059498852,0.00015730069,0.00003039944,0.00008408932,0.000033488086,0.00007415123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035247485,0.00008052335,0.000034666235,0.0001244317,0.00013469665,0.00010240951,0.00034178,0.00003376461,0.000023717985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000400589,0.00005641695,0.950302,0.00002133858,0.000013826379,1.16478304e-7,0.00059202005,0.00026385856,0.000011137319,0.028473863,0.0013678746,0.018893553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018696851,0.000012885743,0.78516275,0.000004216409,0.000010599017,0.0000026868088,0.000058529018,0.0005462548,0.00001710087,0.007364886,0.20656335,0.00006974274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007882869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010145183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20519549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009391934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004715248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.566125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200448734","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102665","title":"COVID-19 impacts on U.S. lumber markets","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Boom; Downstream (manufacturing); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Real estate; Agricultural economics; Economics; Economic shortage; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economic surplus; Business; Welfare; Commerce; Market economy; Engineering; Operations management; Finance; Government (linguistics); Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.015063790918005254,"score_gpt":0.2549736494964943,"score_spread":0.23990985857848907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200448734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74977374,0.000014449567,0.000003296073,0.0066252663,0.00006998722,0.000069917805,0.000019362184,0.000022968592,0.24340099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587283,0.0005268054,0.000119404904,0.020082306,0.0002699954,0.000008149065,0.00002959679,0.000017497321,0.020217957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920225,0.000022802622,0.00014302948,0.00026112373,0.000044682834,0.00032610993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991928,0.00006269144,0.00005056413,0.0002576773,0.0000015267883,0.00043473786],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013164553,0.00013016263,0.00011928319,0.00005156923,0.00014626674,0.00007902564,0.000116980744,0.00006174395,0.0048764218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021627532,0.0001323532,0.000049210565,0.00010811871,0.00013207244,0.0001690145,0.00023799251,0.00007062922,0.0022364373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010725665,0.00013308924,0.38120553,0.00006614437,0.000055081186,0.000052395895,0.0008637092,0.009158499,0.000022367785,0.21341017,0.3883607,0.0065650726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044475877,0.000036683436,0.14986691,0.0000035914388,0.000007652754,0.000022580343,0.000011105007,0.0014321541,0.000027765689,0.016036063,0.8319159,0.0001947968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019880957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002916138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44355524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026339537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075442484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99854046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220944552","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102724","title":"Institutions and environmental resource extraction within local communities in Mozambique","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Natural resource; Natural resource management; Common-pool resource; Dominance (genetics); Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Corporate governance; Environmental governance; Resource management (computing); Business; Economics; Ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.019198936416784957,"score_gpt":0.20578047053928453,"score_spread":0.18658153412249956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220944552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944299,0.000024829138,0.000060766157,0.000747982,0.00002467829,0.00010541708,0.000041558033,0.000009206869,0.0045556817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984634,0.00012894618,0.000040357234,0.00078988133,0.000016573273,0.000013003465,0.00005504576,0.0000036110616,0.00048920704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957865,0.000041611245,0.00011467193,0.00011267285,0.00003712769,0.00011527136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997961,0.000024622235,0.000043087166,0.00009069182,2.635833e-7,0.00004524617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016930276,0.00006671571,0.000062870924,0.00007322389,0.0005436089,0.000025485495,0.00007908125,0.000024133977,0.00017531058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000027949282,0.00007749783,0.000013348513,0.00004768613,0.0003416748,0.00012388117,0.0005301881,0.00011693252,0.000008939317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029473016,0.0000677038,0.86700916,0.0000047790963,0.000006339771,0.0000022725515,0.004360973,0.12298811,0.000006837497,0.0022549322,0.00015388954,0.0031155543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039481022,0.000054246404,0.6696066,0.0000021888395,0.000006452942,0.000024890005,0.016053412,0.02675143,0.0000045341167,0.0011619371,0.28580472,0.00013476559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011800509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012926235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28565085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032441644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009318788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280581208","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102756","title":"Correlating forested green infrastructure to water rates and adverse water quality incidents: A spatial instrumental variable regression model","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Water quality; Endogeneity; Environmental science; Water use; Land use; Watershed; Business; Water resource management; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Environmental planning; Economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Engineering; Ecology; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.016668709470036885,"score_gpt":0.2659804781435501,"score_spread":0.2493117686735132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280581208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99722314,0.000001526549,0.0003640407,0.001111824,0.00010494926,0.0002453019,0.00014182016,0.000020280719,0.00078710786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962849,0.0000061945816,0.0008983556,0.0017455746,0.00006617316,0.000038972623,0.00012603405,0.000014164191,0.0008196001],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877936,0.0000922176,0.00033671054,0.00032170545,0.00010321768,0.00036681164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995563,0.000018345798,0.00007246476,0.00017067473,0.0000031303227,0.00017905241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040535198,0.00016932804,0.00018105439,0.00006518683,0.0005710633,0.000051789313,0.00014204925,0.00006369139,0.00068940566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010938579,0.00012385844,0.000030531515,0.000044962293,0.00009754259,0.00036050228,0.0012504803,0.0001671132,0.00003933763],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038431078,0.00008366746,0.4525009,0.00004187581,0.000040047587,0.000002906381,0.020274399,0.51176465,0.0035137767,0.007364263,0.00059580366,0.0034334026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00362749,0.00048651797,0.4132646,0.00003069806,0.000046312936,0.00009971626,0.002417354,0.44205087,0.003497449,0.10023883,0.033036,0.0012041517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0184016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023928417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092874564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004400046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002185134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9881349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281784412","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102781","title":"Forest succession, management and the economy under a changing climate: Coupling economic and forest management models to assess impacts and adaptation options","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University; Government of New Brunswick; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Softwood; Forest management; Logging; Hardwood; Wood production; Silviculture; Economic impact analysis; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Adaptation (eye); Business; Environmental science; Forestry; Economics; Geography; Ecology; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering","score_opus":0.03163645821562364,"score_gpt":0.2506955274386609,"score_spread":0.21905906922303728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281784412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98058504,0.00015860565,0.0006109359,0.0025086252,0.00008300175,0.0009906656,0.00004119099,0.00003212697,0.014989791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932524,0.0031510636,0.0007793975,0.0013816203,0.00009546678,0.000306941,0.000035650417,0.000032552998,0.00096488476],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849856,0.000030144636,0.00034693736,0.00048188402,0.000061337276,0.00058114924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992932,0.00008121299,0.00015483664,0.00026008784,0.0000026059204,0.00020802912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007088223,0.0002485749,0.00023393476,0.00030283304,0.001142876,0.00034660526,0.00020562988,0.000039463277,0.000077111574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003111458,0.00022867075,0.000039000734,0.000131318,0.00024678724,0.0006401666,0.0019576268,0.00010758817,0.000028615115],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063615116,0.000011664075,0.015768614,0.00004852528,0.000040844843,0.0000013019165,0.0007189404,0.52041984,1.4087082e-7,0.46168643,0.00028947633,0.0009505757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014726396,0.000073970215,0.041958302,0.000021078318,0.00008070917,0.000020312767,0.0019223341,0.87062633,3.6759812e-7,0.07061029,0.012868471,0.0003452007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012991362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003527838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39107615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027896353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010470991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93249226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293700557","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102822","title":"The anatomy of social capital of a Canadian indigenous community: Implications of social trust field experiments for community-based forest management","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Social capital; Public relations; Population; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Economic growth; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.0553871499295242,"score_gpt":0.3533957706462708,"score_spread":0.2980086207167466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293700557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98709303,0.000034824825,0.0000021062654,0.0021006255,0.00006134433,0.00054394646,0.0007510804,0.0000056180797,0.00940743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991375,0.000045073786,0.000070050075,0.0002747702,0.000041357176,0.00026653067,0.000071103175,0.000011772219,0.00008183517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990966,0.00016224016,0.0003378554,0.00007628274,0.00004518271,0.00028185474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992105,0.00023881007,0.00027025669,0.00018217435,0.000035885394,0.00006240655],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055857614,0.00009289712,0.00022367388,0.00023029967,0.005045276,0.000024843424,0.0004855373,0.000053032167,0.0000117508025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016180695,0.00010533512,0.00010473146,0.00014865385,0.0005573387,0.000063005995,0.00023005683,0.00016257248,2.7975557e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007283219,0.00023557722,0.04065978,0.000045631077,0.00012224996,8.224937e-8,0.2000218,0.00010387915,0.000021539108,0.75714356,0.0005879104,0.000985138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025444988,0.0009821365,0.13719098,0.000010232935,0.00012259877,9.442161e-7,0.6912484,0.00008024939,0.0010825513,0.07710615,0.08910827,0.0005229849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54052746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.712894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68003744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040066798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033036407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99625003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312223812","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102902","title":"Forest landowner demand for prescribed fire as an ecological management tool in Pennsylvania, USA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prescribed burn; Stewardship (theology); Willingness to pay; Land tenure; Acre; Forester; Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; Biodiversity; Forest management; Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Geography; Forestry; Ecosystem; Economics; Agroforestry; Ecology; Agriculture; Environmental science; Political science","score_opus":0.05920727537815463,"score_gpt":0.23371749168079872,"score_spread":0.1745102163026441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312223812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98938996,0.00011708176,0.00010559942,0.00056342536,0.00017381282,0.0007118334,0.00033664436,0.000015116564,0.008586512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948508,0.00047220147,0.0004763653,0.0010375584,0.00015796818,0.0005784536,0.00018319102,0.000028932553,0.0022145014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984596,0.00002076961,0.00058314606,0.00052597484,0.000017112083,0.0003934146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937046,0.000072194256,0.00021150129,0.00026172667,0.0000026198536,0.00008153161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006376581,0.00018075474,0.00034402873,0.00019268351,0.0002780935,0.000080765145,0.00023107522,0.00008441516,0.0006773968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003642446,0.00022044315,0.000087958346,0.00006110022,0.00006021108,0.00036380347,0.00024276768,0.00012007581,0.00015987974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007925289,0.00020104296,0.40572935,0.000022212354,0.000032080417,0.0000021331764,0.00025519382,0.027031472,5.014337e-7,0.5653568,0.00034994655,0.00094002334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015196746,0.00036521678,0.6794335,0.0000028423792,0.000008635848,0.000011496881,0.0001827537,0.034966707,0.0000016937188,0.22856846,0.05461131,0.00032766015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008484052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014465237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3367883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041562432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023001363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8989411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388962517","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103104","title":"Developing community-based criteria for sustaining non-timber forest products: A case study with the Missanabie Cree First Nation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Business; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Environmental planning; Community forestry; Citizen journalism; Indigenous; Corporate governance; Geography; Political science; Economics; Forestry; Ecology","score_opus":0.0767611837467572,"score_gpt":0.2701494455512354,"score_spread":0.19338826180447818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388962517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877211,0.0000013227157,0.00035821297,0.010604615,0.000029837047,0.00081290427,0.000016278087,0.000031128024,0.00042459118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810845,0.0000048109764,0.0004836051,0.00079768413,0.0000797881,0.00007052598,0.00004355284,0.000011532268,0.00040007365],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937874,0.0000392718,0.00012930419,0.0001794128,0.000046714125,0.0002265618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994719,0.00016060127,0.00007462987,0.00023373013,0.000016783712,0.00004233555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005822273,0.000114203875,0.00009737806,0.000082359045,0.0014887647,0.0001212903,0.00017193254,0.000028045588,0.000008818079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055591223,0.00008837344,0.000020693924,0.00022629829,0.00014906313,0.00012226841,0.00025818183,0.00006311173,0.000011257766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009930825,0.00009219926,0.92564,0.00013702284,0.00005503493,0.00003097237,0.014753127,0.054811493,0.0000012367366,0.000278832,0.0035101373,0.00059066864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018839247,0.00045633453,0.73979145,0.000022059601,0.000071729424,0.00003772186,0.045173008,0.061441384,0.0000087779335,0.0008252576,0.14990728,0.00038107528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013534194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093867056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1858485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017512929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038234728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394707311","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103224","title":"From staples to smorgasbord: Zeitgeist of Canada's forest management in the 21st century","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Zeitgeist; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0070727968920140825,"score_gpt":0.2103118287192002,"score_spread":0.2032390318271861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394707311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8801113,0.000084107785,0.0000032378234,0.004127999,0.00015152636,0.0002606722,0.00012244117,0.000011227384,0.11512754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99617213,0.00052183616,0.000116692005,0.0013950055,0.0002106238,0.000024305573,0.00003098631,0.000015146278,0.0015133037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908507,0.00001763699,0.00023588352,0.00025164557,0.00008600857,0.00032375052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995443,0.000066916036,0.00003450453,0.00026568596,0.0000012245575,0.000087338485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016045794,0.00013957897,0.00013078596,0.00010364811,0.00006716955,0.00008415568,0.00033862807,0.000032553435,0.00027302708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011227369,0.000112368325,0.000034638637,0.00022167883,0.00009199218,0.00012485065,0.00027612306,0.00007385802,0.000117468946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006531181,0.00009240394,0.090700425,0.00012631879,0.00010869099,0.000043907276,0.004811405,0.023542427,0.0000040643667,0.7510195,0.09950564,0.029979924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001515339,0.00004191661,0.17617474,0.000022887949,0.000016217424,0.0000015212576,0.000555416,0.0025648624,0.0000044753892,0.010017172,0.8102845,0.00016476717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6863065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7410023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001966012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45822474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401847812","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103315","title":"A preliminary Coasian proposal for tree auditing via planning control of tree farms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"New York Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Coase theorem; Audit; Tree (set theory); Control (management); Forestry; Business; Mathematics; Geography; Economics; Accounting; Management; Transaction cost; Combinatorics; Finance","score_opus":0.01061366651356031,"score_gpt":0.24096294664094933,"score_spread":0.23034928012738903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401847812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9175305,0.00015717243,0.0028493262,0.0033199291,0.00021506386,0.0008013627,0.00013320301,0.000088278495,0.07490517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965425,0.000022482536,0.00055350177,0.00022676119,0.00037925458,0.00005076184,0.000022371365,0.000024307921,0.0021780552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915624,0.0000105396575,0.00024767994,0.00023828572,0.000038258495,0.0003089841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959624,0.00010914969,0.00007950079,0.00013016078,0.0000021230906,0.00008285316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017677329,0.0001415165,0.00017710742,0.000102496604,0.000097658216,0.00006070478,0.0001420843,0.0000632246,0.00007846926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029348972,0.00013229881,0.000079881705,0.00007880191,0.00017595936,0.00024738122,0.000105542815,0.00006467055,0.0000854588],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009798392,0.00018985999,0.1693617,0.001076596,0.00038868847,0.000026325455,0.007861813,0.04292276,0.0004586622,0.4398745,0.034895863,0.3019634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021249664,0.0013022901,0.06666903,0.00014076477,0.00015017907,0.00004106566,0.00012762415,0.6876898,0.00024303298,0.086203784,0.15465745,0.0006500277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065226946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058623217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64476705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007301119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033725108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5394989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403024340","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103343","title":"Substitutability of U.S. and Canadian softwood lumber: A threshold modeling approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Softwood; Economics; Econometrics; Agricultural economics; Forestry; Pulp and paper industry; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.016655246146858056,"score_gpt":0.21930156202013812,"score_spread":0.20264631587328005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403024340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91598284,0.00013542938,0.00003587926,0.00035712722,0.00003543314,0.0001175325,0.000030375977,0.000018338666,0.08328706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866116,0.0002496066,0.00025615693,0.00015775554,0.00009212657,0.000007758793,0.000010851858,0.0000111422,0.0005534437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999311,0.0000055020237,0.0001595627,0.00023984272,0.000029297586,0.00025485305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996411,0.000014431097,0.000017771721,0.00015185615,0.0000014667013,0.0001733299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016486575,0.000104184495,0.00012019949,0.000096496995,0.00008131751,0.00007096839,0.000097259275,0.00006008634,0.00010695108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012552791,0.00010286796,0.000031952884,0.00009852969,0.00020339125,0.0002479245,0.00011591418,0.000071922565,0.00005842517],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015749245,0.000035108995,0.2773069,0.000269319,0.0000574515,0.0000029545897,0.0022072739,0.161663,0.000005316239,0.5485074,0.0018544995,0.008075044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115314404,0.000020586574,0.0084823035,0.000009305789,0.000015991725,0.000008728315,0.000020958962,0.9484781,0.000002231644,0.026208665,0.016482845,0.00015496183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25127658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19417529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7868151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011337469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051884235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8205289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403340205","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103341","title":"Forest sector models for tropical countries - A case study of Colombia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Amorfix (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Tropical forest; Tropics; Developing country; Geography; Natural resource economics; Regional science; Agroforestry; Economics; Economic growth; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.02259291047067243,"score_gpt":0.25548074353778305,"score_spread":0.2328878330671106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403340205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951153,0.000033825592,0.000094823605,0.00026954527,0.00010400548,0.0005757026,0.0000792084,0.000032336055,0.0036952477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976315,0.000056707948,0.00011073007,0.00015012147,0.00020392839,0.000075560216,0.00000628413,0.000020638028,0.0017445128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919623,0.000011412092,0.00024331544,0.00025058983,0.000042268945,0.00025616112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995866,0.00010812361,0.00004529322,0.00016949709,0.0000033697222,0.00008711328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009400084,0.00013436102,0.00018248249,0.00008950108,0.0001140215,0.00009466812,0.000114362054,0.000057325677,0.00014030637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013709354,0.00012530723,0.00005495939,0.00008898862,0.00016689199,0.00031554588,0.00014988513,0.000053192536,0.000059895625],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022203282,0.00037185702,0.22981621,0.00034123808,0.00020770782,0.00014574248,0.010473212,0.09228899,0.0000031335203,0.63970023,0.02395937,0.00247027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017144395,0.0018143863,0.017911106,0.000025545407,0.00014871868,0.00027730197,0.0008040187,0.74545,0.000009694186,0.08328461,0.1480352,0.00052495266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009969845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027409608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65316105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009109463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024682065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99662286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405126377","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103380","title":"New frontiers of forest economics, IV: Entrepreneurship in forestry: Innovation, uncertainty and profit","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Profit (economics); Forestry; Economics; Forest management; Business; Microeconomics; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.024137019137658724,"score_gpt":0.22739207919718263,"score_spread":0.2032550600595239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405126377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842742,0.0029313911,0.0010525429,0.0018726198,0.00062463933,0.00028844978,0.0003979188,0.000036742415,0.008521457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937677,0.0038617514,0.00059520645,0.00023982381,0.00035364437,0.000023773755,0.00007287958,0.000033039963,0.0010522155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799544,0.0000113324,0.0010432866,0.00057101354,0.000008315968,0.0003705898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917793,0.000091119415,0.0002734958,0.00031192604,0.000013479381,0.00013207404],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004931496,0.00023901963,0.00051354687,0.00096142426,0.0000866318,0.00016102105,0.00019519456,0.00018985031,0.000046903773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015145693,0.0002972061,0.000078330435,0.00030389644,0.00023906588,0.0007221943,0.00010802026,0.00019038057,0.000046923786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027356693,0.000009834469,0.29264992,0.000052692092,0.000037441387,7.677992e-7,0.00034348055,0.0047549075,3.750325e-7,0.69984245,0.0006520401,0.0016287277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006529719,0.00006669194,0.06127556,0.00003946788,0.000009165083,0.000015483978,0.0001016314,0.014699652,0.000017609442,0.8702553,0.052536454,0.00033005083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022797803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002491142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23137435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021618244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023653418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406175061","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103397","title":"Economic gain of genetically-selected coastal Douglas-fir: Timber, log and carbon value at varying planting densities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Douglas fir; Value (mathematics); Carbon sequestration; Sowing; Economics; Carbon fibers; Agricultural economics; Natural resource economics; Forestry; Environmental science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Agronomy; Carbon dioxide","score_opus":0.0057434298722414895,"score_gpt":0.20735468957931025,"score_spread":0.20161125970706875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406175061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93475646,0.000047328693,0.000006033024,0.00030920748,0.00008804344,0.00012743309,0.000025403342,0.000018665642,0.06462145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956795,0.00037185955,0.00023856816,0.0002746565,0.000118577234,0.0000055686683,0.000018939372,0.000013107103,0.003279215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911386,0.000020725074,0.00027155163,0.0002537051,0.000027864355,0.0003122668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995716,0.00009998689,0.000093308714,0.00015842282,0.0000025282648,0.00007414044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012560602,0.00015560995,0.00021417158,0.000113302216,0.00013161244,0.000042952368,0.00011712506,0.00007912079,0.000078653524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000254263,0.00016915292,0.000032304462,0.000070597605,0.00031514195,0.000095968186,0.00050999,0.00006574057,0.000040630865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013506504,0.000033341017,0.84786457,0.00010977927,0.00010028636,0.0000026835771,0.00064203993,0.05585628,0.00034972752,0.09065427,0.002906165,0.001345801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018797477,0.00018110203,0.46030983,0.00006846823,0.000108061104,0.000035996087,0.00005427226,0.48664242,0.0012186569,0.015754096,0.03305669,0.0006906695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008519593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068249023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43078613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012353815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031540978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99808276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407394491","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103448","title":"Towards an efficient implementation of the EU biodiversity strategy in forests – An analysis of alternative voluntary conservation mechanisms and selection criteria","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Koneen Säätiö","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Biodiversity conservation; Biodiversity; Nature Conservation; Business; Turnover; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Economics; Ecology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.014917326176502477,"score_gpt":0.27315082225155357,"score_spread":0.2582334960750511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407394491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983648,0.0000016967583,0.000519081,0.0006507275,0.00001744642,0.00018400961,0.000056272824,0.0000029935075,0.00020293694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905914,0.000024694862,0.00018570566,0.0006706337,0.0000027153164,0.000004897542,0.000034221448,0.0000015639127,0.000016452534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949473,0.00004266702,0.00018387356,0.00015816277,0.000040803046,0.00007977499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976707,0.00001056422,0.00011112707,0.00008124374,0.000003827901,0.000026191074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001697329,0.0000641288,0.000106146275,0.00014331052,0.000063995765,0.000014592073,0.00007685281,0.000026455356,0.000070359514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000041945723,0.000060381586,0.000022881051,0.00022728721,0.000104099985,0.00019418186,0.000119804885,0.000025346044,3.8620394e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027641723,0.00005688765,0.90121806,0.000009958895,0.000050656374,6.1084314e-8,0.00058114395,0.069301985,0.00046558346,0.026963647,0.000028651773,0.0012957116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002456145,0.00006343156,0.83879715,0.0000021338053,0.00005815812,1.2633078e-7,0.0006572869,0.15633954,0.0009602318,0.0027769392,0.00005674589,0.000042624702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05832547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1738321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115506634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013634129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013733669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94794524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408107708","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103459","title":"Economic impacts of maple syrup production potential in Kentucky: Input-output analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Resources Conservation Service Maryland; Natural Resources Conservation Service","keywords":"Maple; Production (economics); Economics; Economic analysis; Agricultural economics; Input–output model; Economic impact analysis; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Biology","score_opus":0.007787070571817492,"score_gpt":0.23694571500371922,"score_spread":0.22915864443190173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408107708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99306715,0.0000760654,0.00002232702,0.0005406643,0.00011656656,0.00005791901,0.0001576346,0.000017787826,0.0059439177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837166,0.0004293958,0.000051399373,0.000053651303,0.00021185349,0.0000072607595,0.00009889537,0.000009483665,0.00076640444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903476,0.000011470583,0.0003719511,0.00031385187,0.0000215275,0.00024643878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994247,0.000036581412,0.00017711514,0.00028520732,0.0000143914485,0.0000620154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011089984,0.00014846468,0.00034064948,0.0005263096,0.00004892628,0.00004051508,0.00014764267,0.00012554567,0.000043369942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000543378,0.00016813136,0.000107017026,0.0001613452,0.00009372862,0.00017119685,0.00011429616,0.00011321917,0.0000074321006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059652334,0.0001849179,0.92523956,0.00040554488,0.0018690681,0.0000055497057,0.00062928704,0.034477595,0.016506327,0.014685978,0.0012637444,0.004135871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032453276,0.00009296604,0.7944503,0.00017563588,0.00089044496,0.00003973152,0.00068963086,0.050565146,0.102576345,0.027734004,0.01844814,0.001092366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036317902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008030895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13078932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003538932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018177679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68561983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408489104","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103456","title":"Sustainable forestry logistics: Using modified A-star algorithm for efficient timber transportation route optimization","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Biomass Utilization and Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Star (game theory); Forestry; Optimization algorithm; Computer science; Algorithm; Business; Mathematical optimization; Transport engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.0124893206260933,"score_gpt":0.23423137815024947,"score_spread":0.22174205752415616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408489104","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0816746,0.000051467367,0.91494805,0.00006330937,0.00016344816,0.0004193164,0.00009323169,0.000097859025,0.0024887093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95635027,0.00018611354,0.0409114,0.00018404656,0.00012697213,0.00007091049,0.000441063,0.00003918154,0.0016900226],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993161,0.0000039025654,0.00023585172,0.00015690133,0.000023449931,0.00026380375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997358,0.000022286978,0.000036965528,0.00011692866,0.000037487793,0.000050553394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007452896,0.0001320962,0.00013387119,0.00020890187,0.0001171372,0.00007425351,0.000063944266,0.00008845002,0.0000055514524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013977609,0.00015182888,0.000042253232,0.00012270737,0.000038323527,0.00010411983,0.000013559496,0.000035048684,9.408979e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007579975,0.000010670563,0.00012382078,0.00013524105,0.000028575096,5.910702e-7,0.000051721625,0.804261,6.812377e-7,0.1944995,0.00015742972,0.00072314596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054877443,0.000013806235,0.00046552892,0.0000132878795,0.000036920483,5.011204e-7,0.00015654463,0.98780525,0.000036999903,0.0046424316,0.006141765,0.00013816942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017899081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014763736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8746757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016024902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047456968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6191402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409338227","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103469","title":"Equity in unilateral value chain policies: A monitoring framework for the EUDR and beyond","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"European Research Council; Academy of Finland; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Equity (law); Business; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.06567129224049006,"score_gpt":0.3032691251039089,"score_spread":0.23759783286341885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409338227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720391,0.0021322388,0.0014608859,0.009122453,0.0006549968,0.00043335173,0.00030957107,0.000022440156,0.013824975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924353,0.0037099519,0.0010548211,0.001879051,0.00043088887,0.00006927653,0.000006278345,0.000020084051,0.0003943874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853593,0.0000069101425,0.00055906724,0.00038081873,0.000008044633,0.00050920347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911845,0.00033246636,0.0001615168,0.00028960351,0.000007164872,0.00009079789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005159624,0.0001969091,0.00039735372,0.00028671997,0.00023243713,0.00024049854,0.0002655201,0.00019213051,0.0000047570484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000184017,0.00020722605,0.00008432852,0.00015523583,0.00013784999,0.00023720005,0.00024332362,0.00018504915,0.000009591847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030479532,0.000016784586,0.12367177,0.000039281862,0.000040871364,1.9778581e-7,0.0005068933,0.0015456538,3.2507333e-7,0.87289083,0.00007095772,0.0011859746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005611677,0.00003674979,0.14397272,0.000027245143,0.000007146666,0.00000275741,0.00023536757,0.013660362,0.000009870359,0.8117455,0.02954358,0.00019748746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022187412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000427626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061145272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022804385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005242272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8450433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409418978","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103489","title":"Modeling willingness to continue participation in payments for ecosystem services programs: A case of China's second phase of the grain for green program in indigenous communities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Sichuan Agricultural University; University of Toronto","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Indigenous; China; Payment; Willingness to pay; Phase (matter); Business; Ecosystem; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Public economics; Economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental economics; Economic growth; Ecology; Geography; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.06838513929734308,"score_gpt":0.30301272637897886,"score_spread":0.23462758708163578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409418978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996117,0.00011566927,0.00059719,0.00013867469,0.000075070886,0.0021873245,0.00065444683,0.0000051697343,0.00010946012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984838,0.00003652674,0.00036106328,0.00006999908,0.000020177831,0.0008889983,0.000069658534,0.000013535549,0.00005624302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987653,0.00001662163,0.0008125178,0.0001744501,0.000007225858,0.00022386522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994256,0.000047354686,0.00028996967,0.00019501186,0.000010609141,0.00003145696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005592991,0.000117507145,0.0003777194,0.00022391023,0.00008304137,0.000028731532,0.00015123983,0.00008162931,0.000002234683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016238651,0.00012612596,0.00007231387,0.00010788989,0.000037233887,0.00016710645,0.00006791153,0.000050175884,5.283956e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017647605,0.00067569176,0.8602678,0.0011667853,0.00007342913,2.941046e-7,0.018234445,0.05487792,0.0000028355234,0.050345995,0.0000017318825,0.014176553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046127434,0.0005336386,0.08036452,0.00024879005,0.000019914369,0.0000034682912,0.0025793265,0.8514185,0.00010528602,0.059050348,0.00080767844,0.00025580762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010498698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.110646784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79654056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015077091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030039086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409877765","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103497","title":"Integrating cultural perspectives in pro-sustainable-forest-management behavior: Evidence from Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal groups in Ontario, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainable forest management; Forest management; Geography; Cultural diversity; Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Socioeconomics; Environmental planning; Sociology; Forestry; Ecology; Anthropology; Economics","score_opus":0.007287532582885818,"score_gpt":0.2679053686515088,"score_spread":0.260617836068623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409877765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99419993,0.00007235514,0.00000898386,0.0008371181,0.00005192649,0.0004632037,0.000005275625,0.0000052506534,0.00435598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693346,0.00024335056,0.00043384358,0.00019995963,0.00002140265,0.00012212814,0.000008868262,0.0000057651573,0.0020312113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885464,0.000027468639,0.00026335867,0.00043323368,0.000061782666,0.00035951083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999617,0.000052774834,0.000057029385,0.00017051128,0.0000048766096,0.000097836964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018025062,0.00017298273,0.00017518693,0.00008630656,0.00012966499,0.00008469575,0.00015170967,0.000053473166,0.00011519503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029434479,0.00017092073,0.000019420142,0.0001458651,0.00023675196,0.000526541,0.00013342798,0.00022251737,0.0000020990592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032892083,0.000068166904,0.97783524,0.000020412475,0.000004796001,0.000012973187,0.0069210785,0.0014752946,0.0000030081467,0.012980778,0.00010539467,0.00053999375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033874335,0.000025366558,0.9596127,0.00003588847,0.000009131779,0.0000017538794,0.029281665,0.00081084936,0.000004811623,0.0039043082,0.00581364,0.0001611142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022360586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00585486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042976375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99796146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413744490","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103605","title":"Harnessing women's traditional ecological knowledge through photovoice to address shea tree caterpillar (Cirina butyrospermi) infestation in semi-arid Ghana","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"African Botany and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Western University","keywords":"Arid; Photovoice; Caterpillar; Infestation; Geography; Tree (set theory); Ecology; Sociology; Biology; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.03265132467587554,"score_gpt":0.2565005747518304,"score_spread":0.22384925007595488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413744490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886723,0.00007339938,0.000003247626,0.003234453,0.00014483575,0.00020608329,0.000098537836,0.00003025047,0.0075368597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973393,0.00015775199,0.000033878845,0.0015469327,0.00024635627,0.00011992858,0.000037089914,0.0000012886481,0.0005174367],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888647,0.000042635627,0.00027995015,0.0003372568,0.000025875623,0.00042779956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942654,0.0003549896,0.000060973965,0.000045886947,0.00002236085,0.00008923455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016649958,0.00016709101,0.00027967792,0.00004574002,0.00036404593,0.00006773705,0.00014872364,0.00014470711,0.000060176673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001117449,0.00009064921,0.000043559266,0.00026524768,0.00015509743,0.00021595336,0.00013059241,0.00011188192,0.000024335986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032297894,0.0010242265,0.8407249,0.00008558974,0.00013765586,0.000019140924,0.009651113,0.0012189555,0.0024104135,0.11698047,0.0029407614,0.024483819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028217162,0.00019815558,0.9573931,0.000019208335,0.0000066434395,0.0000050773983,0.0014389838,0.00034034578,0.00008653062,0.01867006,0.021355921,0.00020381623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000494409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019632228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11666821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002747212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043443866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414090312","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103595","title":"Equity, diversity and inclusion in Canada's forest sector labour force: Are we making progress?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Commit; Indigenous; Diversity (politics); Government (linguistics); Census; Inclusion (mineral); Immigration; Inequality","score_opus":0.01680052040651635,"score_gpt":0.24773095211790808,"score_spread":0.23093043171139171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414090312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979718,0.00010047268,0.0000036813383,0.0046283365,0.00007769056,0.00021078435,0.000029994926,0.000012633854,0.015218396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960429,0.00035518,0.000041764968,0.0015699463,0.0000665654,0.000008184587,0.0000048016104,0.000007878591,0.0019027827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991081,0.000015673344,0.00016993876,0.00025798765,0.00007420727,0.00037409176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963987,0.00003506351,0.00008472693,0.00015247925,0.0000023928915,0.00008547468],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016623316,0.00014467078,0.00016667019,0.0001193869,0.0009967725,0.000049834358,0.00028575765,0.000059053735,0.00008499898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020501882,0.00014978895,0.000020785892,0.0001653952,0.00014505685,0.0002248258,0.025998432,0.00009528283,0.0000080395375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023677376,0.0000145084205,0.96077305,0.00006285562,0.000008084182,0.0000048576767,0.00060067355,0.0015164131,3.5866142e-7,0.030424975,0.0017000368,0.0048704827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048782036,0.000025215993,0.88453746,0.000054891796,0.000009069258,0.0000019119848,0.00006460308,0.0104155205,0.0000031050936,0.068270385,0.03594244,0.00018756663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72506267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9821301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25706744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074598903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008467673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414479048","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103628","title":"Community resource management areas and household food security in northern Ghana: Insights from a socio-ecological systems perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Child Nutrition and Water Access","field":"Nursing","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Livelihood; Context (archaeology); Natural resource management; Corporate governance; Resource (disambiguation); Natural resource; Food systems","score_opus":0.0216897957208769,"score_gpt":0.24461663377617004,"score_spread":0.22292683805529315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414479048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884164,0.00043914796,0.000004239063,0.0027905006,0.00011874375,0.00033833933,0.00010347815,0.00004344189,0.007745738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860936,0.00010592532,0.000009190491,0.0010227609,0.00014934962,0.000024766148,0.00003301241,0.000010642548,0.00003499166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991904,0.00014832654,0.00022156589,0.00022715816,0.00002537782,0.00018718271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994914,0.00016434403,0.000059743434,0.00020413374,0.000012111552,0.000068277426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010148778,0.00014149271,0.00024583857,0.00020156635,0.00028353248,0.00015003036,0.00014392035,0.00012348883,8.68282e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024988969,0.0001400376,0.00003771508,0.00008955937,0.00012229705,0.000116835734,0.00020642263,0.0002673514,0.0000015699777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009016963,0.0009851775,0.58254325,0.00038920142,0.00028718135,0.000011198705,0.025210151,0.0007288983,0.0000011278426,0.38708794,0.0014756555,0.00037851575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029705786,0.00020527517,0.63789713,0.00016140142,0.00004563837,0.0000050901967,0.016257318,0.0010258767,0.00001858151,0.33336514,0.0077657085,0.00028227587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011278384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063155316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05535387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034932597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012511816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416768915","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103667","title":"Testing the effect of ecosystem service and land classification on global values of forested watershed ecosystem services","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Watershed; Ecosystem services; Valuation (finance); Land cover; Stock (firearms); Land use; Ecosystem; Watershed management","score_opus":0.011348989731324154,"score_gpt":0.2274423654243457,"score_spread":0.21609337569302156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416768915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99567086,0.00003908505,0.0000021203996,0.00035398424,0.00006491027,0.00032039126,0.000101807265,0.000016242506,0.0034305826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975395,0.000027951704,0.000017744249,0.0001100036,0.000046063094,0.000016914018,0.000014096334,0.0000065147433,0.000006777321],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910545,0.00007664757,0.00035148638,0.00023118602,0.000052390213,0.00018281683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919474,0.00026113706,0.00023252636,0.00025126964,0.000010598409,0.000049719325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038245713,0.00015081372,0.00028751732,0.00004144577,0.00013368529,0.000046066227,0.00021573434,0.000083898885,0.0000054368206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016511503,0.00009441176,0.000032758468,0.00018758349,0.000018195327,0.0001584707,0.00015670009,0.000040700404,0.000013936533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009095195,0.000011342495,0.9906626,0.0011514432,0.000042819593,1.8302363e-7,0.00020678333,0.0058387774,0.00008767619,0.0009977237,0.000010161828,0.0008995466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081635325,0.00025919586,0.83684003,0.0003207223,0.00006875609,0.00000912646,0.00016670406,0.15821895,0.00091210875,0.0017253938,0.0005252361,0.00013740816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044127936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15382254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007484654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012196285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98231345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417159779","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103776","title":"Assessing the economic tradeoffs of various forest management activities to enhance carbon sequestration efforts in Pennsylvania and Maryland","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Maryland Department of Natural Resources; U.S. Forest Service; National Institute of Food and Agriculture; AgBioResearch, Michigan State University","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Forest management; Revenue; Climate change; Incentive; Climate change mitigation; Sustainable forest management; State forest; Ecoforestry","score_opus":0.006473201762175392,"score_gpt":0.2602506910352315,"score_spread":0.2537774892730561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417159779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93988496,0.000019933326,0.000020253014,0.0009733475,0.00006546878,0.00032850463,0.000004946687,0.000008456784,0.058694143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976309,0.00026105036,0.00014395319,0.00038062973,0.000048409827,0.000031091105,0.0000049160685,0.0000086039,0.0014904239],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992346,0.000020526411,0.00024484377,0.0002382936,0.000030191091,0.00023155709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996274,0.000060207934,0.00008042864,0.00018606962,8.2420115e-7,0.000045053195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021843886,0.00013426662,0.00016170983,0.000146153,0.00008733718,0.00011898931,0.00013842015,0.000047403435,0.000019439654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000065324416,0.00012129853,0.000022039107,0.00009175282,0.00014943877,0.00031452047,0.00022015572,0.00006457237,0.000007779022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008306345,0.000053664528,0.7068716,0.00019721774,0.00007114865,0.0000047040794,0.0018637542,0.08429413,0.00008457096,0.17933634,0.0010862761,0.026053527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000436516,0.0000893024,0.9220871,0.00006286836,0.000035586254,0.0000040342607,0.00017032195,0.03473632,0.00019393681,0.024892064,0.017012184,0.00027976444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009328257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019188756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2152155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022481763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024135717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W960820541","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2015.06.004","title":"Characterizing the profiles, motivations and behaviour of Quebec's forest owners","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Residence; Incentive; Sample (material); Forest management; Order (exchange); Population; Geography; Business; Socioeconomics; Environmental resource management; Forestry; Demographic economics; Economics; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.0216040064661309,"score_gpt":0.2294966241760164,"score_spread":0.2078926177098855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W960820541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843807,0.000011970007,0.0000051813863,0.0022140392,0.00004004674,0.00017337783,0.0000245206,0.000011074333,0.013139079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953784,0.00007073411,0.00008463157,0.00042703815,0.000120251236,0.000015310248,0.0000217915,0.000010271997,0.003871598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994534,0.000013740847,0.00016634914,0.00013873244,0.000040109022,0.00018762887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996003,0.000029163868,0.00010047092,0.00016466304,0.0000035808516,0.000101812904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016224102,0.000098130615,0.0001046853,0.00005020026,0.00010068577,0.000050362338,0.00013115845,0.000040631985,0.000044826294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041140156,0.00007299353,0.00002300992,0.00007591512,0.00030553338,0.00028580445,0.00021372922,0.000055700995,0.000055292996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010555371,0.000018150098,0.92639494,0.0000078773855,0.000009412242,2.89558e-7,0.001269307,0.0006256711,0.00001582647,0.06641337,0.0040571187,0.0011774764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028427006,0.00004551761,0.94476885,0.0000062218983,0.000015401547,0.000004579132,0.0001369767,0.0020589272,0.000038820945,0.004854453,0.047659,0.00012699838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034940068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018569946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06155892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059883783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002379321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}