{"meta":{"query_hash":"4f09bd179a34","filters":{"venue":"Games and Economic Behavior"},"cohort_total":73,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":73,"exported":73,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4f09bd179a34","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Games+and+Economic+Behavior"},"results":[{"id":"W1491181859","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2016.04.001","title":"Object allocation via deferred-acceptance: Strategy-proofness and comparative statics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Comparative statics; Mathematical economics; Object (grammar); Set (abstract data type); Population; Resource allocation; Computer science; Rationality; Class (philosophy); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07436292279732265,"score_gpt":0.26958138631792233,"score_spread":0.19521846352059968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491181859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938572,0.0010243283,0.0015689335,0.000083909275,0.00032393335,0.00028432577,0.00017206548,0.000036702786,0.0026485783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978348,0.00020577082,0.0001618871,0.000027575268,0.000082824256,0.000074277734,0.000008068838,0.000016355081,0.001588438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878293,0.000023358985,0.0005145633,0.00041787667,0.00001383299,0.00024741638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993054,0.00006639819,0.0002960935,0.00021920029,0.000013776657,0.00009907708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037709458,0.00018071094,0.0004192326,0.000087132845,0.000099267665,0.000105025254,0.00010606187,0.000090541405,0.00028191676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008735395,0.00016246137,0.000045510915,0.000032366246,0.00013969507,0.00032156153,0.000041617455,0.000067423185,0.00024861592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009207095,0.00015663695,0.582259,0.000100939986,0.0001199301,0.000005078351,0.0029464737,0.000046843234,0.0011172858,0.31999937,0.00042051746,0.09273587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027237975,0.0003971198,0.9500403,0.00010990917,0.000067002155,0.000077920005,0.0019547225,0.0017688727,0.0010670417,0.031784922,0.008819136,0.0011892468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013691968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009209205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36778134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007656604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014794415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66249824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968905048","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2014.01.016","title":"Ranking asymmetric auctions: Filling the gap between a distributional shift and stretch","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Common value auction; Regular polygon; Stochastic dominance; Distribution (mathematics); Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematics; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Geometry; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.08481938142026406,"score_gpt":0.34596850779857,"score_spread":0.26114912637830595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968905048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985969,0.00010729728,0.011776668,0.0014036538,0.00016511581,0.00013420073,0.0001412796,0.000020284815,0.00028249447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921125,0.000027016076,0.00014209136,0.000051022722,0.00025831274,0.000055370794,0.000012647123,0.0000048688694,0.00023740872],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990447,0.00007398524,0.0003300094,0.00030916146,0.00010368734,0.00013845022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863434,0.0008750753,0.00014418663,0.0002477638,0.000022574126,0.00007603685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012971443,0.00008896285,0.000154883,0.00008976533,0.00050460827,0.00025874688,0.00019306011,0.00005251799,0.0003074845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113317714,0.00006139999,0.000053309075,0.00014152988,0.00018884343,0.00018125078,0.00006236345,0.00010950933,0.000107793705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007825832,0.00002821577,0.30277056,0.000002036246,0.00001771365,1.9648179e-7,0.0003268167,0.00009004434,0.000025346526,0.09033993,0.0012440851,0.60514724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034266082,0.00003095944,0.84564483,0.0000064027577,0.00008092813,0.000021218275,0.0007228568,0.0018516863,0.00015127572,0.096000575,0.054947805,0.00019882915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033334334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011844447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6049484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002222691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015714393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38810897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974429698","doi":"10.1006/game.2000.0815","title":"Epsilon Cores of Games with Limited Side Payments: Nonemptiness and Equal Treatment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Parameterized complexity; Mathematical economics; Payment; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Combinatorics; Finance","score_opus":0.04175621839172083,"score_gpt":0.23870608914174649,"score_spread":0.19694987075002565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974429698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959164,0.0013856133,0.00006059593,0.000081020444,0.00016079945,0.00027817037,0.00013343488,0.000026504096,0.001957458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733144,0.00078619557,0.0001791915,0.000028679544,0.000052970645,0.00006779668,0.000016338843,0.00002538459,0.001512021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987824,0.000015782534,0.00053358136,0.00040055145,0.000015151742,0.0002525168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922985,0.00005792826,0.00035936857,0.00024410791,0.000011260788,0.000097504526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000225663,0.00021077195,0.0005529342,0.00013473655,0.00006842571,0.000060700295,0.000083556006,0.00008299016,0.00016074875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075111766,0.00019030861,0.000055723638,0.00004662294,0.00013793599,0.00016494849,0.000035483106,0.000054275773,0.000046372912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013840616,0.00017312274,0.9745534,0.000034821496,0.00007503488,0.000011047436,0.00076329306,0.00004121433,0.0000944015,0.013873822,0.00002636312,0.010215047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004863489,0.0017068016,0.9719652,0.00013913676,0.00015267891,0.00022767438,0.0014534809,0.00096782,0.000718792,0.0017936096,0.015149396,0.0008619305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092249335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017399278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015123032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063545354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012024811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.776056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992428101","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2010.06.002","title":"Equilibrium joining probabilities for an M/G/1 queue","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Queue; Join (topology); Poisson distribution; Computer science; Service (business); Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Phenomenon; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Economics; Combinatorics; Computer network; Physics; Statistics","score_opus":0.02382778392177146,"score_gpt":0.2538317663166927,"score_spread":0.23000398239492123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992428101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99759686,0.000015534551,0.0001060937,0.00018153741,0.00041310283,0.00025163806,0.000009002064,0.00010437765,0.0013218562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966732,0.0000012895758,0.0012352857,0.00029444508,0.0009730907,0.00015395811,0.000028778395,0.000029619414,0.0006102925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992353,0.000003283948,0.00020838092,0.00030305315,0.000024419629,0.00022561081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995529,0.00003403998,0.00012309467,0.0002426339,0.000029038163,0.000018311543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029902207,0.00013421896,0.00019396511,0.00009477479,0.00010081846,0.00025183658,0.00013315435,0.00006227897,0.00026857495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000355404,0.00013314214,0.00007296331,0.000029622786,0.000089321955,0.0012956617,0.00007996357,0.000094508585,0.00004324126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026986856,0.0003625076,0.2018194,0.00044290203,0.0001060514,0.000005526997,0.0006620909,0.0013276407,0.040806606,0.5533827,0.0023401077,0.1984746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049820314,0.00027866117,0.07638751,0.00010694411,0.0020312348,0.00004910411,0.0065184752,0.14156386,0.0031664707,0.2705508,0.49033573,0.0040291855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019487999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006665694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48799562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001334059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011126579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5429379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992818571","doi":"10.1006/game.2001.0890","title":"(Sophisticated) Stable Sets in Exchange Economies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Equivalence (formal languages); Von Neumann architecture; Set (abstract data type); Rationality; Space (punctuation); Property (philosophy); Core (optical fiber); Exchange economy; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.05745302908625478,"score_gpt":0.2258838899126072,"score_spread":0.16843086082635242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992818571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97078145,0.0042813797,0.0000128234105,0.00034351344,0.00055620377,0.00024587297,0.00018632913,0.000046327983,0.023546107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932173,0.0006404422,0.00008814854,0.00009260809,0.000098111195,0.00010662219,0.00000835058,0.000029109327,0.005719328],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984588,0.000017625154,0.00064704334,0.00048085445,0.000009442308,0.00038623286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993273,0.00004493336,0.0002224375,0.00029631215,0.000004438207,0.000104548635],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004634084,0.00018992875,0.0004897718,0.0002275489,0.0000745233,0.00010309348,0.00016302618,0.00012311527,0.004480212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015814996,0.00023487366,0.00006936587,0.000050451396,0.00008375443,0.00026890342,0.00006242883,0.0001323735,0.002488243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020784832,0.00026281227,0.7665179,0.00011364501,0.00004164942,0.000026591755,0.0021846418,0.00006299884,0.000019464438,0.21078792,0.0039559985,0.016005637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004377047,0.0003184379,0.58547163,0.000120535355,0.000055225737,0.00014532269,0.001003693,0.018197805,0.00012599156,0.029861653,0.35802984,0.002292813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047138662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018410786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35407385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014475042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000042747097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996864214","doi":"10.1006/game.1999.0767","title":"Subgame Monotonicity in Extensive Form Evolutionary Games","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Wright; Monotonic function; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Subgame; Replicator equation; Generalization; Mathematics; Computer science; Population; Game theory; Repeated game; Equilibrium selection","score_opus":0.04884692327721313,"score_gpt":0.32954932131061837,"score_spread":0.28070239803340524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996864214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99454683,0.00025449877,0.000015505539,0.0005470961,0.0000753973,0.00026926358,0.000057017078,0.000025417732,0.0042089988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936892,0.00018176685,0.00022680972,0.00018164533,0.000047289872,0.00014032677,0.000005435841,0.000008589412,0.0055189836],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986266,0.000046831283,0.00048690513,0.000477975,0.00010364144,0.00025804303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911004,0.00022295665,0.00009256216,0.00043585888,0.000028747625,0.00010983678],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005502078,0.00013369262,0.00026568308,0.00012437197,0.00010618951,0.00010118016,0.00030746323,0.00008161988,0.0051515726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033543776,0.0001161322,0.000083636136,0.00011173915,0.00017836537,0.00035088012,0.00006210882,0.00012095246,0.0014038944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091683585,0.00020727348,0.19221643,0.0000021642682,0.000007743182,0.000012016496,0.0012590875,0.0003611213,0.00025036282,0.0112174265,0.0033270805,0.79104763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003879056,0.00003576778,0.9207853,0.000006315168,0.000014061596,0.000040456718,0.00075303455,0.0012608125,0.000120101366,0.038600102,0.037798747,0.0001973918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020482072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002027244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7908502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006988274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044099306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001380691","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2012.04.005","title":"Favoritism in asymmetric contests: Head starts and handicaps","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Ex-ante; Head (geology); Microeconomics; Economics; Head start; Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Developmental psychology; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.040023953299039294,"score_gpt":0.3312649387049365,"score_spread":0.2912409854058972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001380691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98618615,0.00625511,4.8150264e-7,0.00028890694,0.00041809256,0.00026742197,0.000024834211,0.000024645617,0.006534352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720466,0.0019376996,0.00013103944,0.000083493745,0.0001249243,0.00008744257,0.0000031103327,0.000011447661,0.00041616394],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990524,0.00003858292,0.00023114245,0.00022035939,0.000038175058,0.00041934394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995908,0.00005308602,0.00006376661,0.00008588955,0.0000056786816,0.00020076186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003583114,0.00012152361,0.00024223908,0.000120250705,0.00021332638,0.00008910884,0.00007096116,0.000082343104,0.000102387305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013177858,0.00013689519,0.00003052413,0.000046387093,0.00032146918,0.00046466663,0.000086513115,0.00009108459,0.00004384885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004259663,0.00007302434,0.95570725,0.0000023990976,0.0000037946165,0.0000021370133,0.005282202,6.564819e-8,0.000047855123,0.0052991314,0.0001686048,0.03340925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075190054,0.00005723962,0.96389866,0.000017382625,0.000026378864,0.0000069304624,0.012034111,0.000003445638,0.00014438674,0.00015925236,0.022604952,0.0002953577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013687275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010243916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03311389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024668025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002866724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99288064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009233380","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2010.09.004","title":"Social distance in a virtual world experiment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social distance; Virtual world; Social psychology; Psychology; Dictator game; Computer science; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.028564907302867166,"score_gpt":0.33490965350264157,"score_spread":0.3063447461997744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009233380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848927,0.00011030467,7.082856e-7,0.0006579059,0.0006090826,0.0002323199,0.000013711931,0.000032034604,0.013451187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968782,0.000050252267,0.00009041319,0.00006027834,0.00022404315,0.00020623318,0.0000025208979,0.000012764656,0.0024753127],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909836,0.000021999984,0.0002346472,0.00028663574,0.00004397822,0.00031439026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997175,0.00002138982,0.00006693077,0.000097216616,0.00000601211,0.00009099455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019912668,0.00012314184,0.00020741836,0.000073194795,0.0003167153,0.00009989124,0.00014141307,0.000072019335,0.0004775035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003897301,0.00014206972,0.00005152076,0.00003972125,0.00043997372,0.00021751873,0.000086046726,0.00016473634,0.000058211004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004171158,0.00031432707,0.67287564,0.000002644192,0.000011163955,0.0000124697945,0.04348474,0.0000013437132,0.0065929405,0.23457749,0.0016577966,0.04042772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002849219,0.00015232465,0.61172944,0.000023047318,0.00006512602,0.0000049977666,0.06885215,0.00005081752,0.0056356424,0.0013666993,0.30759558,0.0016749629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040015597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08676478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30593777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021887191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052158026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9298994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015123404","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2011.09.002","title":"A new stable and more responsive cost sharing solution for minimum cost spanning tree problems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Cost sharing; Core (optical fiber); Mathematical optimization; Spanning tree; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Steiner tree problem; Point (geometry); Fixed point; Computer science; Space (punctuation); Tree (set theory); Fixed cost; Cooperative game theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Game theory; Combinatorics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.10111342676648626,"score_gpt":0.25791261119516407,"score_spread":0.1567991844286778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015123404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99134916,0.001259688,0.0032358374,0.00011487441,0.0004536766,0.0011314648,0.00020920105,0.000046329053,0.002199797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919244,0.000093033304,0.0016628391,0.000052953754,0.0001417832,0.00030037772,0.000019137373,0.00003983474,0.0057656416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985049,0.0000096400745,0.00054005894,0.00054562814,0.000011397256,0.0003883801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992039,0.000050079576,0.00032771644,0.0002415635,0.000013796133,0.00016293832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006451153,0.00019299032,0.000429008,0.00015347672,0.0001670757,0.00012314902,0.0001382386,0.00012575023,0.00017009018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028645358,0.00022885046,0.00007575017,0.000036590594,0.00006757738,0.00032120608,0.00008791148,0.00009924088,0.000059987757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050912873,0.00015145971,0.7892206,0.00025185788,0.00014985274,0.000007667648,0.01611249,0.000050209008,0.00056294695,0.12420511,0.002636502,0.06614218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009652747,0.0010604593,0.79891026,0.0004758727,0.00029089366,0.00019810986,0.004910011,0.03203953,0.0010141124,0.034316566,0.1144143,0.0027171187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011871805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020257123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11177779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009138962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023900991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9332251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048798070","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2012.03.007","title":"Optimality and the English and second-price auctions with resale","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Common value auction; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Business","score_opus":0.04716652789948902,"score_gpt":0.31956309713943176,"score_spread":0.27239656923994277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048798070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953457,0.00035573187,0.00023261429,0.00050941715,0.00013506992,0.00017674973,0.00003387437,0.000017645321,0.003193183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602395,0.00006448802,0.00035583242,0.000087776265,0.0001344736,0.000085878484,0.0000011260211,0.0000047697354,0.0032416938],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933547,0.00006010091,0.00019939488,0.00021917847,0.00005204394,0.0001338012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991863,0.00031732657,0.00010023582,0.00025793895,0.000027788057,0.00011042875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011338638,0.000075897755,0.0001398413,0.000034234392,0.00031322194,0.00017015667,0.00009775082,0.000036384135,0.0006454339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004267902,0.000044751512,0.000021915002,0.000049644266,0.0004933087,0.00039531992,0.000075601616,0.00008229496,0.000031336225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002792964,0.0001758701,0.5625462,0.000009176352,0.000055855944,7.252763e-7,0.0149427485,0.00004216741,0.00009711897,0.31721288,0.0073890416,0.09724892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011622253,0.00003464681,0.7912917,0.0000033936624,0.000084925836,0.00012381078,0.009589425,0.00014797652,0.00011265661,0.0057452293,0.19149537,0.00020865139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029140343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037309575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31146765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009757906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000115558805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70670485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060835352","doi":"10.1006/game.2001.0847","title":"Player Types and Self-Impression Management in Dictatorship Games: Two Experiments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dictator; Dictatorship; Impression management; Impression; Social psychology; Psychology; Observer (physics); Microeconomics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematical economics; Political science; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03520154320108555,"score_gpt":0.34016513251246117,"score_spread":0.3049635893113756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060835352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848901,0.001342361,4.747204e-7,0.00013903942,0.00027725243,0.00038225244,0.0000056623708,0.000050057435,0.012912776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946225,0.0038261984,0.00031244894,0.00007130148,0.000065946886,0.00018902816,0.0000025918416,0.000015936723,0.00089401874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998953,0.000042390726,0.00024702886,0.0003682794,0.000053425305,0.00033586216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996425,0.000021863958,0.00007102559,0.00012808845,0.0000051484335,0.00013139835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020305268,0.00015890392,0.00021768665,0.00009241295,0.00021857179,0.00010939862,0.00011596228,0.000067930974,0.00022361755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001873312,0.0001663227,0.00003242121,0.000035427922,0.00015974198,0.0002871456,0.00016324219,0.00007421186,0.000044114237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003309479,0.0002431697,0.9483258,0.0000068282616,0.000028592796,0.000032198972,0.018100118,0.0000031203426,0.00026304435,0.0033634717,0.00022154626,0.029379018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004569913,0.00020325868,0.8476764,0.00011033748,0.00020065608,0.000020371504,0.073762156,0.00013726323,0.0014497357,0.0008417996,0.069728315,0.001299815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031263682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019488998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10064942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002506152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000165039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6782443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068852191","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2008.08.001","title":"Truthful mechanism design for multidimensional scheduling via cycle monotonicity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism design; Context (archaeology); Monotonic function; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Job shop scheduling; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.11188396067773654,"score_gpt":0.3422649103141397,"score_spread":0.23038094963640315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068852191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6973123,0.000031649477,0.3019772,0.00013791418,0.00015554897,0.00029930554,0.000026775724,0.000023956192,0.00003535583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95238125,0.000016845557,0.046423897,0.000085115,0.00007353784,0.00024259233,0.000003506465,0.000010148863,0.0007631159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892473,0.00003986281,0.00036784407,0.00040795258,0.00008516324,0.00017443502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990192,0.0004232013,0.0001454523,0.00025980297,0.000042751577,0.00010955771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074800727,0.000107944994,0.00019711019,0.00007204289,0.00044713396,0.0000352008,0.00015397037,0.00007332306,0.00039553805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055368306,0.000093757015,0.00009602241,0.00004478168,0.000104405735,0.0002030691,0.00005054827,0.00006388482,0.00024841967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006779263,0.001038271,0.01689719,0.000011183712,0.00010878271,0.000016991567,0.0035980274,0.044955947,0.05008186,0.51371104,0.005096431,0.36380637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038269467,0.00036584126,0.05684764,0.000014156578,0.00016556123,0.00050906057,0.0020863859,0.44806743,0.07905725,0.3796852,0.02807993,0.0012946094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002082985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003446524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4031115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030539464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043248012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43308643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069506462","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2015.02.003","title":"Extreme value theorems for optimal multidimensional pricing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Microsoft Research; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Applied mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.18798578991247789,"score_gpt":0.3744438635196962,"score_spread":0.18645807360721833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069506462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98083687,0.00007387199,0.017370468,0.00039737532,0.0003368033,0.00027155897,0.000044509055,0.000025003284,0.00064354873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98726684,0.0000041886924,0.009125438,0.000096413605,0.00014979269,0.00012954292,0.000006274954,0.000009161001,0.0032123327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990912,0.000030329275,0.00031230896,0.00032713515,0.0000931103,0.00014589276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991531,0.00028694898,0.00012217247,0.0002385697,0.000055853172,0.00014337208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012203922,0.000087202636,0.00015536793,0.000062974665,0.00014354762,0.00008432859,0.00015550137,0.00004856244,0.00021996022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001030988,0.000068025605,0.00006735081,0.000039736362,0.00010556892,0.00019305166,0.000065810316,0.000046096524,0.00022103566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020031622,0.00022122319,0.02641513,0.0000029952164,0.000024642435,0.0000020244215,0.0022003474,0.0073517077,0.002467191,0.65980315,0.0182677,0.28304353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047174906,0.0004312036,0.077096544,0.000021684604,0.00019737596,0.00021378732,0.015260501,0.092682384,0.006243242,0.22101961,0.5809223,0.0011938559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018102555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004441231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5626546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003299676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048008453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.284104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071697652","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2003.10.004","title":"Threshold strategy-proofness: on manipulability in large voting problems","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Mathematical economics; Cardinal voting systems; Anti-plurality voting; Approval voting; Lipschitz continuity; Computer science; Space (punctuation); Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Law","score_opus":0.050713419178953466,"score_gpt":0.24800912576121684,"score_spread":0.19729570658226336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071697652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99351734,0.0004802103,0.00006675977,0.00012147061,0.00034802867,0.0004491089,0.000086224194,0.000048658192,0.004882206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993363,0.000029413259,0.00003198029,0.000066532884,0.00009263915,0.00010592321,0.000010793398,0.000028573979,0.00029784648],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998196,0.000013871299,0.000738078,0.0006022465,0.00001712615,0.00043266252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993313,0.000022263452,0.00024917506,0.00030339282,0.0000059131426,0.000087987195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001031884,0.00021121991,0.0004604377,0.00015688674,0.00009442726,0.00011566144,0.00017323393,0.00014060977,0.00020537685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014884443,0.00023877429,0.000086139815,0.000063419546,0.000055226163,0.00022919489,0.00005682049,0.00022442048,0.0004332067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013559432,0.00020734376,0.5668325,0.000050330476,0.000008566271,0.000005844313,0.00043601543,0.0020113543,0.00001292188,0.4294338,0.0000075150474,0.0009802666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030138942,0.00028311598,0.9196818,0.0001370065,0.000012947956,0.000025119496,0.00059133006,0.001510444,0.000099100405,0.072721876,0.0011740895,0.000749286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061731995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067304564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3567119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021666483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018686034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9736933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079729086","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2008.12.001","title":"Gift giving and worker productivity: Evidence from a firm-level experiment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Incentive; Sowing; Workforce; Labour economics; Economics; Tree planting; Agricultural economics; Business; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Agroforestry; Agronomy","score_opus":0.11697608678920877,"score_gpt":0.3320611405103499,"score_spread":0.21508505372114112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079729086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99203026,0.0058535845,0.0000030398614,0.0006605995,0.0004009233,0.00036444832,0.000033514803,0.00004866521,0.000604983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99446344,0.0024429557,0.000864057,0.00004645631,0.00021846771,0.00018747372,0.0000019877677,0.000017236314,0.0017578977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878544,0.00004759465,0.0002415029,0.0005347585,0.00006679889,0.00032389638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999449,0.00008426366,0.0000995717,0.00019710713,0.000013116197,0.00015690718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020964872,0.00017779261,0.00028838887,0.000042197127,0.0006433238,0.0001034402,0.000127991,0.000079827056,0.00029800655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023487955,0.00019142184,0.000050404302,0.000026720501,0.0006271241,0.00057477964,0.00020548879,0.0000963162,0.00004518143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001982347,0.00008247991,0.94110197,0.0000023058517,0.000019554305,0.000011246516,0.03575823,0.0000010470817,0.0029909052,0.00015259991,0.0005936073,0.019266209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041464463,0.00007606036,0.97083783,0.000058826357,0.000055329958,0.000013880956,0.013589945,0.000015538608,0.003904211,0.00009006364,0.010411477,0.0005321888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017820602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035570338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029735843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002307621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007635086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9887198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083467094","doi":"10.1006/game.1999.0716","title":"An Example of Dynamic (In)Consistency in Symmetric Extensive Form Evolutionary Games","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Consistency (knowledge bases); Extensive-form game; Equilibrium selection; Markov perfect equilibrium; Subgame; Selection (genetic algorithm); Stability (learning theory); Computer science; Mathematics; Sequential game; Mathematical optimization; Nash equilibrium; Game theory; Repeated game; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.06133991525684419,"score_gpt":0.3326287466656262,"score_spread":0.271288831408782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083467094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972919,0.00041932033,0.000010220933,0.00008771529,0.00005014461,0.00023941309,0.00004818853,0.000010624505,0.0018424336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984016,0.00017396004,0.00036254607,0.00004058842,0.0000117797745,0.00007742087,0.000008275464,0.000007668238,0.00091616623],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985196,0.00006120872,0.00065001147,0.00045941037,0.00009712767,0.00021266633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897254,0.0002829525,0.00012688566,0.00050381885,0.000032479624,0.00008131485],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069606426,0.00011481223,0.0003118713,0.0004132528,0.00005234945,0.000040824743,0.0002983332,0.00007225594,0.0016123721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031297503,0.00010383477,0.00006506885,0.00031284319,0.00016915174,0.0003540888,0.00003405516,0.00008933517,0.0001533595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004698042,0.00031838924,0.1646798,0.000003938043,0.000003786077,0.0000063703346,0.0011265535,0.00021288176,0.00041097455,0.00955695,0.00009888959,0.8235345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035910463,0.000065725435,0.96900135,0.000009474366,0.000011080315,0.000022872462,0.0015011989,0.0026946096,0.000032146927,0.02503807,0.0011335642,0.00013079877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011823686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001043239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068300295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052678206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085667665","doi":"10.1006/game.2000.0836","title":"Cooperation, Secret Handshakes, and Imitation in the Prisoners' Dilemma","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Handshake; Dilemma; Prisoner's dilemma; Imitation; Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Superrationality; Repeated game; Limit (mathematics); Computer science; Adversary; SIGNAL (programming language); Microeconomics; Game theory; Economics; Computer security; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.08203987794972302,"score_gpt":0.35174878228635326,"score_spread":0.26970890433663025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085667665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968814,0.00010618434,0.00020235986,0.0015299277,0.000045441953,0.00020736775,0.000013657338,0.000007705298,0.001005928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988837,0.000082159444,0.00007855228,0.00020596659,0.00003808969,0.00009290952,0.000008557661,0.0000035239398,0.0006065231],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992713,0.00006624508,0.00026493,0.00023181736,0.00006226634,0.00010348867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994135,0.0002496466,0.00006644584,0.0002107738,0.0000213174,0.00003835213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009274419,0.000068051406,0.00010712422,0.00005998254,0.00013032493,0.00028217686,0.00015628466,0.000037902886,0.0002261224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053990596,0.000045355016,0.000018319537,0.00008723195,0.00008835475,0.00023339274,0.00002169717,0.00006106225,0.00007508548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004550295,0.00012102783,0.6245688,0.0000022489962,0.0000054582233,0.000006388448,0.0074482006,0.00018332327,0.00061114907,0.068467915,0.0045926753,0.2939473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048761175,0.000045143704,0.9189312,0.000004276793,0.000018118748,0.000062636886,0.0043104235,0.001362491,0.00004999282,0.0068987343,0.06769202,0.00013734304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000640432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043143806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2943624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001052266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014579108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2721038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086723411","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2011.07.005","title":"Dynamic coordination with individual learning","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coordination game; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.09279793172436003,"score_gpt":0.3256794959273052,"score_spread":0.2328815642029452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086723411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955706,0.000022644048,0.0005222636,0.0000812858,0.000045450764,0.00010625914,0.000010807511,0.000026079055,0.003614622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961118,0.000005009262,0.000717417,0.00002354818,0.000009370159,0.00004821593,0.0000050107656,0.000006465558,0.0030731494],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993352,0.00003326828,0.00019311043,0.00024980423,0.00007430449,0.00011429581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999555,0.00007548564,0.000113048176,0.00017549156,0.000021226897,0.000059738457],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005491996,0.000072054354,0.00011341846,0.00007936575,0.0001245716,0.00009759855,0.00018963608,0.00003584421,0.0010429899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018204648,0.000053850392,0.000023872653,0.000056340108,0.000102290374,0.0002026833,0.00005048919,0.00008103162,0.00033834128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043214506,0.00009901754,0.4759803,0.0000015435909,0.000017128723,0.0000036483887,0.0037536523,0.000061390485,0.00026795265,0.02101036,0.0003115476,0.49845022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002994717,0.000114370814,0.984559,0.000003509096,0.000043796277,0.000030324798,0.0025681646,0.00058986444,0.00016624307,0.0063705994,0.0051029786,0.00015167097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003341122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000068607136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50857866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013498675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016565175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088358674","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2013.09.008","title":"Strategic learning in teams","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics","keywords":"Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; Process management","score_opus":0.03294249389327887,"score_gpt":0.3037745731684385,"score_spread":0.2708320792751596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088358674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9604562,0.00046114612,1.0701402e-7,0.00027124293,0.00016097515,0.00025034798,0.0000016383942,0.000037489433,0.03836089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711853,0.0006015815,0.000067282424,0.000035369107,0.000057442343,0.00017311909,0.0000018449326,0.000009338099,0.0019354946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927884,0.00003175197,0.00018416988,0.00020850285,0.000025308185,0.000271444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997725,0.000019529358,0.000051350333,0.000065373795,0.0000063292864,0.00008493172],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014887152,0.00009105734,0.00015594244,0.00005021609,0.000186545,0.00013227909,0.00008798484,0.000064633845,0.0010018051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000031498707,0.00009958025,0.000030974723,0.000022821874,0.00018443169,0.00035308377,0.00005270053,0.000111955014,0.0003779065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017756428,0.000042442975,0.96331745,0.0000019973552,0.0000028405477,0.0000019820097,0.0048000016,0.000010078766,0.00035979337,0.0064255176,0.00009772583,0.02493841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011138936,0.00016284548,0.79663223,0.00002669465,0.00003504152,0.000005218333,0.1801434,0.00018683037,0.0003118847,0.0033146401,0.01720974,0.0008575765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026980445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007531172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17534341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021878882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045305438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093000536","doi":"10.1016/s0899-8256(02)00010-6","title":"Calibration and Bayesian learning","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Calibration; Measure (data warehouse); Stochastic game; Test (biology); Bayesian probability; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Mathematics; Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Data mining","score_opus":0.07888508849772863,"score_gpt":0.32010205174464207,"score_spread":0.24121696324691344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093000536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99599236,0.00012813749,0.00074495375,0.0006295569,0.0000458096,0.000074628944,0.000005104545,0.00001984739,0.00235961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99449366,0.000058284702,0.00016387142,0.000056242374,0.000037924197,0.000021443318,0.00000116773,0.000004270258,0.0051631304],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999425,0.000032917284,0.00018703555,0.0002224162,0.000043122538,0.00008950481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961567,0.000109574175,0.0000627897,0.00013495375,0.000006807755,0.00007020278],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029801723,0.000056259276,0.00009778276,0.000047350095,0.00013728405,0.00018627063,0.00008065269,0.0000344905,0.0019094939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027731321,0.000047398153,0.000020419764,0.000033146254,0.00007053006,0.00020225706,0.00003798037,0.00005889048,0.00014704907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048302727,0.000039254068,0.20895848,0.0000015944007,0.0000041706826,0.0000017466485,0.001373298,0.00010308252,0.00066347443,0.021545002,0.0022080294,0.765097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001202754,0.00022107821,0.5832489,0.000014546633,0.00010084205,0.00016171127,0.005102154,0.17315902,0.00095857686,0.043687098,0.19133571,0.00080760615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014130445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016435912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76428944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000066111584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002738317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095237287","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2014.01.015","title":"Strategy-proof preference aggregation: Possibilities and characterizations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Social choice theory; Preference relation; Monotonic function; Mathematical economics; Condorcet method; Set (abstract data type); Status quo; Computer science; Mathematics; Aggregation problem; Relation (database); Economics; Data mining; Statistics; Voting","score_opus":0.049660570646219655,"score_gpt":0.2229314150855681,"score_spread":0.17327084443934845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095237287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935513,0.00042322642,0.0003125599,0.000110435016,0.0002518566,0.00018016263,0.00011769968,0.000032438875,0.0050203023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965153,0.00008333873,0.00007889923,0.000045220313,0.000121768724,0.000055489956,0.000018565537,0.000014148087,0.0030673146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904865,0.000018679038,0.00040405936,0.00034572213,0.000009000096,0.00017386365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945533,0.000037743026,0.0002057162,0.00021383393,0.000008720472,0.00007868052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036594618,0.00012694839,0.00027453594,0.00007517902,0.00011628148,0.0001653504,0.000085447864,0.00007784474,0.00028624322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002069589,0.00014242106,0.00003337813,0.000024168956,0.00009892731,0.0002683809,0.000039120336,0.00007208851,0.000109974746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009425216,0.00004227493,0.37106577,0.00006122392,0.00001826908,4.419017e-7,0.0010273684,0.000018021597,0.00007403577,0.602154,0.000051615916,0.02547751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007979075,0.00021231515,0.93718135,0.00005608563,0.000027057982,0.000038704326,0.00053804246,0.0035089243,0.00024567876,0.047346387,0.009465803,0.00058175344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014343664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033331846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56611556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024412906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000086760365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5807763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104290163","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2006.08.005","title":"Ratifiability of efficient collusive mechanisms in second-price auctions with participation costs","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Common value auction; Microeconomics; Bidding; English auction; Auction theory; Collusion; Economics; Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction; Value (mathematics); Mechanism design; Vickrey auction; Price discovery; Computer science; Financial economics","score_opus":0.028628724498132613,"score_gpt":0.3199889456371675,"score_spread":0.2913602211390349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104290163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919991,0.000011006883,0.0063591823,0.00013477537,0.00008283027,0.00032858798,0.000064153275,0.0000106807465,0.0010097139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857503,0.000001020932,0.0004960736,0.000013707367,0.000015745769,0.00017555473,0.00000502029,0.0000041166595,0.00071375404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989909,0.00005871236,0.00045298395,0.00029139052,0.00008991435,0.000116109215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992369,0.000190688,0.00021445123,0.00025886405,0.00005565761,0.000043456548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000649006,0.00007522569,0.00017332824,0.000103528895,0.00010329886,0.000045186964,0.00010276061,0.000041680316,0.0008899707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026000127,0.000060590315,0.000031550528,0.0001661363,0.00014411563,0.00011240693,0.00002964352,0.000051320287,0.000044159686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028893963,0.0019440841,0.348597,0.000017977554,0.00002321565,0.000004239158,0.0023222168,0.07263801,0.01460894,0.5080855,0.0013456419,0.05012427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005840051,0.000082715495,0.9632716,0.0000068726117,0.000027214544,0.000009257676,0.0018238794,0.0039176387,0.008789071,0.020200789,0.0011269456,0.00015999406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018768356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011448918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6146746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008135085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004338543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9744555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105314806","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2014.09.001","title":"Almost fully revealing cheap talk with imperfectly informed senders","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Communication source; State (computer science); State space; Bounded function; Noise (video); Mathematical economics; Space (punctuation); Interval (graph theory); Principal (computer security); Computer science; Cheap talk; Mathematics; Telecommunications; Mathematical analysis; Combinatorics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Computer security","score_opus":0.04946268594684997,"score_gpt":0.3297721895888294,"score_spread":0.28030950364197943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105314806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99320036,0.000022785007,0.00045253712,0.00043997323,0.00008804477,0.00018750686,0.000017635588,0.000032895307,0.005558274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973247,0.0000146855255,0.0005330915,0.00022523387,0.00007526681,0.00006427164,0.000005597251,0.0000108400645,0.0017462922],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891895,0.00003628776,0.0003594589,0.0003515701,0.00010601275,0.00022770918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989341,0.00030385895,0.0001593136,0.0004286262,0.00003050796,0.00014359102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084974006,0.00013124927,0.00022995216,0.00008180724,0.00017109013,0.00021337949,0.00026311952,0.00005999136,0.0005935454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006611124,0.000095280484,0.000052767802,0.000079517806,0.0001552375,0.00026134236,0.00006445979,0.0000942717,0.00029680587],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019092037,0.00015291029,0.15788697,0.000021983818,0.00004867004,0.0000072913904,0.0033534463,0.0005780554,0.00433548,0.034810968,0.0072267596,0.79138654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032951527,0.0007244323,0.547123,0.0000682567,0.00023844226,0.00047344074,0.012491829,0.0036224164,0.006072871,0.01775474,0.40661585,0.0015195333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007756842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021669688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78986704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002967248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049444705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6498906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128171555","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2011.03.009","title":"Equilibrium rejection of a mechanism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Interim; Complete information; Order (exchange); Mechanism design; Mathematical economics; Repeated game; Path (computing); Computer science; Microeconomics; Bayesian game; Economics; Game theory","score_opus":0.13593416471297354,"score_gpt":0.3370388032606259,"score_spread":0.20110463854765237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128171555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930072,0.000016909158,0.0014289208,0.00004174919,0.0002049918,0.0000879651,0.000014626217,0.000014975549,0.005182682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969436,0.000007686504,0.000490255,0.000018336656,0.000028198523,0.0000292682,6.7361844e-7,0.000003751908,0.0024782484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939203,0.000021554626,0.0002761482,0.0001911154,0.000047415288,0.00007171726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995175,0.00004134032,0.0001429637,0.00023265884,0.000021413814,0.000044142264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044247223,0.000048633723,0.000113106355,0.000069691945,0.000034211153,0.000020217525,0.0001313861,0.000038416318,0.0019940038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017317676,0.00004058655,0.000046099558,0.00004672835,0.00007045041,0.00016029806,0.00004676292,0.000032045937,0.00020693892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008671926,0.00023858617,0.037259907,0.000004750274,0.0000198754,0.0000015437425,0.0033088084,0.000009300463,0.022590172,0.68355715,0.0018393709,0.25108382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006004113,0.00024755733,0.24539465,0.000008335147,0.00009133121,0.00008309147,0.0050481413,0.00059208256,0.12087355,0.6138006,0.012901055,0.00035921636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006376104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012008971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2507246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008617537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012502542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130074778","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.09.009","title":"Predicting human behavior in unrepeated, simultaneous-move games","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Generalization; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Nash equilibrium; Artificial intelligence; Hierarchy; Introspection; Machine learning; Best response; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.038163416900902074,"score_gpt":0.34476115364482735,"score_spread":0.30659773674392526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130074778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98621786,0.00034850536,1.888908e-7,0.00021675,0.00056119094,0.0006020546,0.000054099397,0.00007679134,0.011922544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682534,0.00031345093,0.00007484076,0.000037477646,0.00016321332,0.00028836075,0.000008143981,0.00003233294,0.0022568447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827796,0.000047271766,0.00046725041,0.0005634725,0.00008027057,0.0005637495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989843,0.00006635587,0.0003105118,0.0004630848,0.000021498317,0.00015425963],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038399178,0.0002460827,0.00040664026,0.000100774196,0.001592745,0.0005108203,0.00047179358,0.00017842336,0.00028820828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055424676,0.00028338569,0.00010246395,0.000018887655,0.0007709621,0.00059849187,0.00031045917,0.00020792207,0.00006895125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010088234,0.00011243,0.97673136,0.0000032365328,0.000008150703,0.00004778454,0.004307934,0.0000058413234,0.0007426104,0.0010608103,0.00003418706,0.016935542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010994364,0.00011439534,0.97894305,0.000041473944,0.000112388865,0.0000092345335,0.014748178,0.00008053461,0.00074654724,0.00015753428,0.0033276933,0.000619544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038813308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035853706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016315999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045227373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064593565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133413020","doi":"10.1006/game.1999.0797","title":"Cyclic Games: An Introduction and Some Examples","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Repeated game; Oligopoly; Economics; Complete information; Extensive-form game; Global game; Game theory; Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematics; Cournot competition","score_opus":0.09215908838217957,"score_gpt":0.3535597753645019,"score_spread":0.26140068698232233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133413020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99726176,0.00020700735,0.000075792945,0.0018374716,0.00018147317,0.00014092105,0.000018134284,0.000034617475,0.00024282688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678755,0.00022469844,0.00022542613,0.00012893944,0.00042363725,0.00005570984,0.000007636233,0.0000086865375,0.0021377392],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889725,0.00005069801,0.00031482137,0.00049610605,0.00007062189,0.00017050668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920595,0.00010595102,0.00010339329,0.00042882538,0.00001745124,0.000138426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000671081,0.000108602435,0.00018695655,0.00010468282,0.00015624681,0.00025683214,0.00018400302,0.00007647244,0.0008868355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036028192,0.00009074881,0.000032834774,0.00005901284,0.00017712086,0.00060767523,0.000064832464,0.00009496293,0.00020074158],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039164333,0.00014047632,0.1081657,0.0000022328725,0.000010483678,0.0000031600398,0.0009918866,0.00003977957,0.0053241136,0.06527462,0.00294279,0.8170656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043149912,0.00011381279,0.64010143,0.0000026321065,0.00005635913,0.00018628497,0.0026872254,0.00026323105,0.0005141257,0.057264265,0.29807937,0.00029973313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006141117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000862054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81676584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017229773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000126355535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97102267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144085792","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2003.09.009","title":"Reinterpreting mixed strategy equilibria: a unification of the classical and Bayesian views","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Unification; Bayesian game; Strategy; Interpretation (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Nash equilibrium; Von Neumann architecture; Type (biology); Computer science; Repeated game; Game theory; Statistics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.083668316898636,"score_gpt":0.3487462139057993,"score_spread":0.2650778970071633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144085792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968228,0.00008107241,0.00053818576,0.0012660321,0.00007196738,0.00017500497,0.000016492497,0.000007894843,0.0010205462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918854,0.000015421485,0.00020505679,0.000028616692,0.000023582172,0.000025823183,9.820358e-7,0.0000046056675,0.0005073641],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913484,0.0000602333,0.00038543073,0.0002547926,0.00006436053,0.000100360165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926335,0.00013265315,0.00018770322,0.00034298046,0.000017245655,0.00005607685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060938793,0.000073524854,0.0001588072,0.00003470838,0.00008666724,0.00009173953,0.00023352234,0.000049154285,0.00008873259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005065787,0.000048277376,0.00005298511,0.00006174597,0.00023007698,0.00012326844,0.00009131441,0.00007184022,0.00002146193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058193775,0.00018594222,0.04453237,0.000013392822,0.000018709497,0.0000012126482,0.0023079063,0.00039143467,0.058391254,0.37583777,0.0005624039,0.5176994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009913925,0.00014112092,0.835775,0.00006368867,0.000109909204,0.00006463681,0.0040904502,0.0025647995,0.009454582,0.13771369,0.0086947065,0.00033598967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025584883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009478649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79124266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018329796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036707366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19686943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152066392","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2009.01.008","title":"Cooperation through imitation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Imitation; Stochastic game; Economics; Cartel; Microeconomics; Welfare; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Collusion; Market economy","score_opus":0.04274892892966939,"score_gpt":0.34254271909802675,"score_spread":0.2997937901683574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152066392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759592,0.00027550568,0.000010813804,0.0013210531,0.00025489138,0.00020478922,0.0000067459473,0.00004431361,0.021922689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772227,0.0005438333,0.0005323265,0.00027319355,0.00011437079,0.000031726402,0.0000073027995,0.000004790421,0.000770208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994666,0.000019387653,0.00015102234,0.00017642915,0.000025439944,0.0001611055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998101,0.000011855144,0.00004856947,0.00007058568,0.000011757751,0.00004714416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010588428,0.00007560333,0.00011239872,0.000019570316,0.00032586147,0.000103219245,0.000058276833,0.000052386615,0.00016202395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004914163,0.00008385464,0.000029618195,0.000017892768,0.00011263075,0.000440389,0.000013858323,0.00003989003,0.00008813463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004584611,0.000353187,0.13716362,0.000004150253,0.000023239516,0.0000073540928,0.07682557,0.000039696315,0.0065878825,0.48171923,0.006858275,0.29037195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028532185,0.0008908212,0.72822577,0.000040391013,0.00026698876,0.000013731572,0.061944928,0.00016882333,0.008546626,0.011834532,0.18324974,0.0019644094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014793816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011179254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5910621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001514911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031331572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3419493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153043675","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2006.03.013","title":"An initial implementation of the Turing tournament to learning in repeated two-person games","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"California Institute of Technology","keywords":"Tournament; Computer science; Turing; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Stability (learning theory); Principal (computer security); Turing test; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.029860080249377894,"score_gpt":0.35872496871509396,"score_spread":0.32886488846571604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153043675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99781865,0.000057595305,7.404901e-7,0.00031090688,0.0001873926,0.00033377964,0.000010039515,0.00001763922,0.0012632642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995184,0.00001956496,0.00011984139,0.000032202053,0.00008813699,0.00006930853,0.0000038948456,0.000009237072,0.00013939802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999196,0.000065295426,0.00026841147,0.00020625623,0.000048906586,0.00021511139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999714,0.000013067295,0.0001208994,0.000093847484,0.000010062728,0.000048085923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025399524,0.000090205795,0.00015580656,0.000062305866,0.0002086758,0.0000663706,0.00011601771,0.000032957116,0.00012550148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000027566841,0.00008617122,0.000041666724,0.00004131402,0.00009685023,0.00019926872,0.000049511313,0.00007539413,0.0000043812415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008424762,0.0000419728,0.96256614,0.0000014746389,0.0000030971573,0.0000011024943,0.012490678,0.0002621917,0.0056249816,0.00052234955,0.000027676466,0.018449916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000575046,0.00009132105,0.9138825,0.000015583822,0.000022980073,0.0000012006467,0.070292525,0.000023754836,0.0144458,0.000035302717,0.0004488885,0.00016512032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07387139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06369287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057801846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032584142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004617513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9533923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156879907","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2010.10.011","title":"Identification in first-price and Dutch auctions when the number of potential bidders is unobservable","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Unobservable; Common value auction; Identification (biology); Economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.0414837072043859,"score_gpt":0.3286337893274106,"score_spread":0.28715008212302473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156879907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996114,0.000018918148,0.00031211178,0.0027698001,0.00027787077,0.00014871762,0.000032668715,0.00000716767,0.00031871113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966415,0.000041322106,0.00018846794,0.000053217544,0.000040346404,0.000059437323,0.000001707389,0.0000043412842,0.0029696154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992132,0.000022895829,0.00035772,0.00024499168,0.000069390946,0.00009176269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993138,0.000117499505,0.00016441393,0.00033048933,0.00003306266,0.000040760406],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006627412,0.00006146087,0.000109268025,0.00005586069,0.00018667807,0.00011939479,0.0001939823,0.000057362602,0.0019749228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034387613,0.000045994177,0.000037045407,0.00008502809,0.00020393395,0.00025750953,0.00005785455,0.00010356185,0.00014527788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043559543,0.00026495132,0.83575356,0.000010201315,0.0000265209,9.3016206e-7,0.006942388,0.0002643704,0.010674946,0.054410283,0.014559017,0.07704926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031625305,0.0000073678543,0.9201338,0.0000031167203,0.00003885835,0.000043373926,0.004120878,0.0016364453,0.0012928514,0.045165513,0.02710904,0.00013245383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029958875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003841855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08438028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007935641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001778884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166717043","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2007.02.002","title":"Iterated strict dominance in general games","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; University of Hong Kong; National Science Council","keywords":"Iterated function; Risk dominance; Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Spurious relationship; Best response; Class (philosophy); Epsilon-equilibrium; Mathematics; Dominance (genetics); Stochastic game; Correlated equilibrium; Set (abstract data type); Repeated game; Computer science; Equilibrium selection; Game theory; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06196810361513819,"score_gpt":0.3641725447113662,"score_spread":0.302204441096228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166717043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997133,0.00015831475,0.0002393361,0.00015237629,0.00015159596,0.00016361482,0.000024244968,0.000015999905,0.001961498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952636,0.000037617443,0.00044643722,0.000099715246,0.00007046555,0.000033238888,0.0000034621826,0.0000066549446,0.0040388326],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987734,0.000040036626,0.00049811986,0.0003690019,0.000076694705,0.00024272695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919355,0.00026841933,0.00012090765,0.00030617922,0.000021108657,0.00008981977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017044729,0.00010501791,0.00020817203,0.00017119474,0.00006446635,0.00013871686,0.00025303167,0.00006368183,0.00052802556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049519378,0.000088279216,0.00004709739,0.00016484287,0.00009313449,0.00019919865,0.000059505666,0.00009059228,0.00029418556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009014158,0.00012868564,0.4010433,0.0000016058884,0.000004322605,0.000020761361,0.00076423417,0.00012531783,0.0031134207,0.016505858,0.0018126947,0.5763897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044009692,0.00002565631,0.9684088,0.000004535778,0.000007798556,0.000018373801,0.00042766787,0.00035072857,0.0015532151,0.0039711706,0.024633883,0.00015803118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009640385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026824046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5762316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038692888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022689857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5781509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169382366","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2005.05.005","title":"Mechanism design with weaker incentive compatibility constraints","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive compatibility; Adverse selection; Compatibility (geochemistry); Mechanism design; Incentive; Mechanism (biology); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Participation constraint; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.09139925314207033,"score_gpt":0.33957354209503066,"score_spread":0.24817428895296034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169382366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9442095,0.000014771737,0.05385928,0.00041101428,0.000064999505,0.00028667078,0.000040046336,0.000025953077,0.0010877468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99411744,0.000005836345,0.004717894,0.00011303775,0.000044675107,0.000060548038,0.0000018890099,0.0000051028073,0.0009335729],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906504,0.00006580494,0.00029015317,0.00036139745,0.000085427004,0.00013217279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926597,0.00018385352,0.0001346728,0.00028452536,0.00003603034,0.000094978386],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073644385,0.000093584305,0.00016662624,0.000046138393,0.00015428202,0.00010758399,0.00016210202,0.00004167303,0.002826302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016416832,0.00006858795,0.000033622244,0.000048040547,0.00031383542,0.00023907043,0.00004034719,0.000068479916,0.0006009842],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012342549,0.00030920556,0.047086313,0.0000016948535,0.000029433586,0.0000027971794,0.0015380145,0.00065109093,0.0007535718,0.17187263,0.0021467044,0.7754851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044225296,0.00057198055,0.6575436,0.000036120833,0.00028355437,0.0002902783,0.015462625,0.013526803,0.02728709,0.20991927,0.06896416,0.0016919674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012373927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046404624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77379316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040724866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039030256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99808526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493453559","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2016.07.004","title":"Identification of payoffs in repeated games","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Repeated game; Mathematical economics; Affine transformation; Best response; Identification (biology); Symmetric game; Mathematics; Computer science; Game theory; Normal-form game; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06084493792174564,"score_gpt":0.34706316818657135,"score_spread":0.28621823026482573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493453559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99873596,0.00004108998,0.00017345593,0.00043554185,0.000078461984,0.00012627542,0.00004190085,0.000010576622,0.000356722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961808,0.000050717386,0.000036149122,0.000013929745,0.000015453887,0.000051271556,0.0000010700461,0.0000043398527,0.0036462739],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998916,0.000043940774,0.00058604515,0.00028390036,0.00006709911,0.00010306946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991028,0.00021813568,0.0002195819,0.0003897896,0.000027652271,0.00004209193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009729615,0.00006237467,0.00016280792,0.00012372049,0.000026245163,0.00003878362,0.00021284912,0.00004261312,0.00051538536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000969759,0.000040355815,0.000041075116,0.00007889737,0.00012377076,0.0001823942,0.000045241126,0.000026886439,0.00026921363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019304269,0.00010611609,0.37823313,0.0000019001236,0.0000038216053,9.0441745e-7,0.00040912713,0.000007240154,0.0656452,0.010909958,0.00052653364,0.54413676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034289877,0.00001788326,0.96175206,0.000010762085,0.000010753042,0.000004976032,0.00034478065,0.00004644653,0.017921828,0.015967358,0.0034864354,0.00009380865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029416513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057022677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5835189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021213948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017314225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5643108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514683753","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2016.08.002","title":"Goodwill Can Hurt: A theoretical and experimental investigation of return policies in auctions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Guelph","funders":"Australian Research Council; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Goodwill; Common value auction; Business; Economics; Accounting; Microeconomics; Monetary economics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.04555319489743967,"score_gpt":0.33783338628530724,"score_spread":0.29228019138786754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514683753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974564,0.00003913099,0.000058468784,0.0019071854,0.000060085673,0.00010562417,0.000047507703,0.00000793272,0.00031772218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994062,0.00002284268,0.00009181465,0.000046882327,0.000028677385,0.000049270846,9.0615663e-7,0.0000038288035,0.00034958706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993113,0.00004418656,0.00030064318,0.00020247794,0.000052571522,0.00008881188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949694,0.0001647201,0.000093593,0.00016040128,0.000013959193,0.00007037534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003374876,0.00006188749,0.00012716865,0.00010443233,0.000060858456,0.000033284334,0.00008514445,0.00004308686,0.00041604743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003942299,0.00004133384,0.000024611541,0.000056908633,0.00067179895,0.00014569753,0.000050256935,0.000032724765,0.00001387503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025074885,0.000051653882,0.43784818,0.0000014923727,0.0000049534297,4.2807656e-7,0.0032599347,0.0000033113513,0.036198556,0.49386758,0.00033632535,0.028402494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075565296,0.00010223336,0.7677213,0.000022783406,0.000020725554,0.000045493638,0.0070084487,0.00009574647,0.057358067,0.16529214,0.0013704363,0.00020700053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000084957115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010460585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32987309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026974247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000208403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45554277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560660664","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2018.06.008","title":"Multilateral limit pricing in price-setting games","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Oligopoly; Limit (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Economics; Bertrand competition; Constant (computer programming); Microeconomics; Strategy; Set (abstract data type); Game theory; Mathematics; Computer science; Cournot competition","score_opus":0.06923152673119372,"score_gpt":0.35879406318750195,"score_spread":0.28956253645630825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560660664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963055,0.00004329984,0.000103819184,0.00035601444,0.00017523963,0.0001857626,0.000010274643,0.000025357269,0.0027947219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968459,0.00001090566,0.00089753116,0.00013800635,0.0001424814,0.000049744278,0.0000013987645,0.0000090481935,0.001904989],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874073,0.00004299594,0.00046287375,0.00042178915,0.000078923375,0.00025267072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991825,0.00022782042,0.00014431526,0.00033390505,0.00002731288,0.00008412637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009856886,0.00011123978,0.00020027615,0.0001477571,0.00012245141,0.00019360975,0.00028231106,0.000060536706,0.00078478665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007756555,0.00009256308,0.000047389567,0.000101639496,0.00015585634,0.00025750752,0.00012600797,0.0000948142,0.00072888384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027525793,0.00008434003,0.5422778,0.0000027561564,0.000005036869,0.000004274712,0.0036276826,0.000039554663,0.0025917208,0.0031892944,0.000845838,0.4473042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004298731,0.000057577276,0.9685599,0.000017375529,0.000013339639,0.000020310048,0.001421307,0.0026596375,0.0017783643,0.0047096624,0.020102099,0.00023051816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007332562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015375037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44707367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003745369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023768876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93685704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564276048","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2016.11.002","title":"A note on testing guilt aversion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Economics; Mathematical economics; Inequity aversion; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05590318872847355,"score_gpt":0.32524257566179604,"score_spread":0.2693393869333225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564276048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778146,0.000048244452,0.0000017380921,0.0013521889,0.000388795,0.00016507677,0.000020267837,0.000053209515,0.020155866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971881,0.00014084231,0.00047141197,0.00010532928,0.00014205613,0.00004179928,6.01275e-7,0.000011312957,0.0018985631],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992645,0.0000214397,0.00015700408,0.00026364694,0.000038311777,0.00025509554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953246,0.00010245806,0.00007011615,0.00017991733,0.000010916377,0.00010410382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016782699,0.00010359227,0.0001415913,0.000041338622,0.00033250224,0.000050141018,0.00016336878,0.00006298625,0.00028958078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004703321,0.00008346317,0.000041380525,0.00001851038,0.00023123031,0.00018241462,0.00013252642,0.000040325715,0.0004328423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003586448,0.00011730815,0.5925108,0.0000031299985,0.000010682801,0.000010436698,0.005052509,0.0000013739574,0.01169122,0.009530042,0.0033050762,0.3777315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049485755,0.0011695934,0.7121682,0.00034905344,0.00023247558,0.000019952717,0.015369348,0.000049541406,0.018539015,0.0039014155,0.24076252,0.0024903072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021316982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008302532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3752412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032967515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040196886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55634564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594652624","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.02.017","title":"Information revelation through bunching","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Private information retrieval; Herding; Externality; Microeconomics; Economics; Focus (optics); Bayesian game; Rest (music); Information asymmetry; Information cascade; Mathematical economics; Sequential game; Computer science; Game theory; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11907770030287596,"score_gpt":0.3923268641538337,"score_spread":0.27324916385095777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594652624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98228854,0.000013247542,0.00216615,0.00079776836,0.00020130101,0.00012145497,0.000017437396,0.000015048821,0.014379064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979952,0.00001630028,0.0006677424,0.0000903811,0.00005230277,0.000029445788,0.0000049295027,0.0000024574636,0.0011412249],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994121,0.00001582509,0.0002938441,0.00011943365,0.00006881085,0.00008996018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990663,0.00007222823,0.00029049127,0.0005105007,0.000023693163,0.00003679668],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064694806,0.000059221828,0.000104302686,0.000034059492,0.00050762086,0.0007277271,0.00030541682,0.000041493942,0.0003542453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012674031,0.000048633992,0.00003518847,0.000012497223,0.000081862534,0.0021458,0.00009205072,0.00005258974,0.0010054879],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010158817,0.00001656751,0.10322144,0.0000017703419,0.000004175577,2.5730716e-7,0.0023849322,0.00004102846,0.00014957502,0.10682096,0.0025786024,0.78477055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023145905,0.000013503291,0.81962436,0.000004943185,0.000015437892,0.0000090540925,0.00079578866,0.00048620545,0.00019627072,0.06523489,0.113266595,0.00012150333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000995285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021631817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.784649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001642536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014461632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613277224","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.05.002","title":"Three little-known and yet still significant contributions of Lloyd Shapley","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Shapley value; Mathematical economics; Core (optical fiber); Game theory; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04133412399462716,"score_gpt":0.2569065869552318,"score_spread":0.21557246296060462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613277224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99429697,0.0010683092,0.00018890489,0.000249571,0.0005267342,0.0002609659,0.0012142677,0.000019757312,0.0021745404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890786,0.00020886495,0.000095036456,0.000018163613,0.00009834772,0.000040292693,0.000010533238,0.000017330463,0.0006035913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878323,0.000009276152,0.0005635863,0.0003787453,0.000012742494,0.00025244488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872005,0.000061025185,0.0005787604,0.00050371746,0.000018203362,0.00011823123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062882446,0.0001569133,0.00052020414,0.000083183855,0.00021872977,0.00016843036,0.00022903034,0.00011733978,0.00026755035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008512596,0.00017187426,0.00008465635,0.000012667933,0.0002913613,0.00022154415,0.000119711745,0.000104971965,0.00010724058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022990176,0.00006626629,0.6662151,0.000039354643,0.000047442692,0.0000030337499,0.00028974155,0.000003778016,0.00020825664,0.32801473,0.0003094375,0.0047798436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011767244,0.0001347652,0.9634874,0.000052048978,0.00004992529,0.000018659153,0.0001329672,0.0007798141,0.00034195933,0.02075658,0.012692064,0.0003770897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013544111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019232382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30725813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039671573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016209811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70088285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924012729","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2019.07.006","title":"Limiting Sender's information in Bayesian persuasion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Communication source; Corollary; Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Persuasion; Signaling game; Complete information; Action (physics); Best response; Bayesian game; Limiting; Bayesian probability; Nash equilibrium; Game theory; Theoretical computer science; Economics; Repeated game; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics; Psychology; Computer network; Social psychology","score_opus":0.045457698751297224,"score_gpt":0.31888247633844996,"score_spread":0.2734247775871527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924012729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99357325,0.000012906816,0.00015862797,0.0002989652,0.000115882256,0.00017848123,0.000010041168,0.000013507002,0.005638363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912053,0.000009282786,0.00016266803,0.00010358178,0.00001929944,0.00002442232,0.0000049166,0.0000030324202,0.0005522618],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992761,0.000025687279,0.00033560643,0.00017003829,0.00006898248,0.0001236021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994868,0.00012308898,0.000106652806,0.00022164332,0.000013242456,0.00004859035],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006584946,0.0000645615,0.0001246667,0.00013204459,0.000047780002,0.00015596802,0.000145211,0.00004693437,0.0008636792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028286226,0.00005543463,0.000033660548,0.000061509716,0.000026678012,0.0006367809,0.000057616136,0.0000695598,0.0013836559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017456756,0.000031537216,0.5257555,0.0000037739944,0.0000019587644,6.062941e-7,0.0020711678,0.0003453527,0.00038453558,0.014394646,0.0003226614,0.4566708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008304856,0.000058509995,0.9323233,0.000017602764,0.000011703999,0.000024626823,0.01355391,0.012974381,0.0003403852,0.0100444015,0.029537687,0.0002830378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039406514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033012202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45638776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029561164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017695791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952997420","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2021.11.006","title":"Almost envy-free allocations with connected bundles","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Balliol College, University of Oxford; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Lemma (botany); Mathematical proof; Path (computing); Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Combinatorics; Graph; Bundle; Hamiltonian path; Monotonic function; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03410988676932792,"score_gpt":0.2231898592085411,"score_spread":0.18907997243921318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952997420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98564655,0.003543215,0.00045969643,0.00042060053,0.0010919881,0.00054518663,0.0010371101,0.000105160325,0.007150485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409014,0.00040336882,0.0007631107,0.000093781244,0.00025807763,0.00034487457,0.00030194875,0.000074121934,0.003670562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764276,0.00003750361,0.0008763013,0.0010270432,0.000024189983,0.00039221227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978634,0.00007797136,0.0006816381,0.0011756931,0.0000357993,0.00016548623],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046315242,0.00041360446,0.000959179,0.00019560555,0.00016031011,0.00046305868,0.0004903835,0.000374168,0.00096903567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044512424,0.00046987893,0.00017278097,0.00005571832,0.00017128671,0.00017204422,0.0005229404,0.0004505976,0.00022081986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107962056,0.000754272,0.6359009,0.00078602304,0.00086681737,0.000091013935,0.006119236,0.0015044077,0.00006921064,0.34441072,0.004088909,0.005300487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008136977,0.00068595505,0.83481896,0.0017457799,0.0010761985,0.0008080653,0.010024381,0.006355479,0.00067615515,0.041705526,0.08596998,0.007996575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001853222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008813386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3027052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010002232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031537811","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2020.04.017","title":"A simple proof of strong duality in the linear persuasion problem","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Duality (order theory); Simple (philosophy); Duality gap; Stochastic dominance; Mathematics; Persuasion; Mathematical economics; Dual (grammatical number); Argument (complex analysis); Strong duality; Mathematical optimization; Optimization problem; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.14716169489827916,"score_gpt":0.38314554814360013,"score_spread":0.23598385324532098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031537811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996763,0.000024131845,0.0005420563,0.0017594859,0.000016097412,0.00025680233,0.000035788948,0.000005435214,0.000597194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995543,0.0000036444712,0.000150917,0.0001158082,0.00003715557,0.000050336123,0.00000272712,0.0000025522108,0.0000825553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992564,0.000064925734,0.00032627193,0.00020166277,0.000074778014,0.00007596889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995348,0.00011613871,0.00012191273,0.00017444645,0.000014833865,0.000037859903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075373176,0.00005032035,0.00012498113,0.000024337405,0.000055853434,0.00003476207,0.00020651304,0.000027761484,0.0003218588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003811795,0.000032412398,0.00004082481,0.00008178943,0.00007686576,0.00010882359,0.00005088453,0.00006693493,0.000030921412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017208146,0.0005227349,0.47259626,0.00003302877,0.0000152238035,0.0000034078676,0.026765883,0.0022308636,0.0017120411,0.09766622,0.0056796153,0.39260265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002318623,0.00065348967,0.6774705,0.000022629018,0.00011301384,0.000031406078,0.08247928,0.020649701,0.0063654077,0.061745215,0.14748314,0.00066761137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039457304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003355223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39193502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007519272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019709063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35241282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092853244","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2020.09.008","title":"Sentiments, strategic uncertainty, and information structures in coordination games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Comparative statics; Pessimism; Global game; Coordination game; Information structure; Affect (linguistics); Complete information; Perception; Computer science; Mathematical economics; SIGNAL (programming language); Microeconomics; Mechanism (biology); Game theory; A priori and a posteriori; Economics; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.034329472463711964,"score_gpt":0.29911365128172074,"score_spread":0.26478417881800875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092853244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99466646,0.00023070147,8.4938296e-7,0.0015627601,0.00011859271,0.00027697973,0.000027688899,0.000025494362,0.0030904543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991565,0.00039302392,0.00008144428,0.00021715871,0.000045309287,0.000039348375,0.000016609642,0.0000048262823,0.00004577545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936646,0.00002586108,0.00022922886,0.00016756599,0.000039015493,0.00017185954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997446,0.000014879739,0.00008717482,0.000046229135,0.000009933265,0.00009717369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010604989,0.00010125067,0.00015984781,0.000051734394,0.0001427581,0.000172856,0.000067179644,0.000063025436,0.00013372044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000058093888,0.000110494446,0.000021386768,0.00003369406,0.00016438315,0.00084076234,0.000066359746,0.0000682823,0.0000190763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006655,0.00006095502,0.7649723,0.000036869867,0.000029713983,0.000004964401,0.05516853,0.00017401806,0.0008127316,0.11347787,0.00073821377,0.06445722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003982846,0.00035999212,0.742981,0.00003826172,0.00014205015,0.000007607996,0.21356,0.0025734827,0.00086206896,0.005851169,0.028317396,0.001324125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040318444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014676919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15839148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001348399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039201466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60949695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122501643","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.11.009","title":"Belief updating and the demand for information","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Stanford University","keywords":"Certainty; Value of information; Value (mathematics); Explanatory power; Subjective expected utility; Quality (philosophy); Information quality; Yield (engineering); Aptitude; Econometrics; Psychology; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Information system; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.07985142296356297,"score_gpt":0.3751320584919505,"score_spread":0.29528063552838757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122501643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960255,0.00006546203,0.00018933897,0.0010330834,0.0005170443,0.00033320553,0.0000627376,0.000010956283,0.0017626559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863875,0.00006709639,0.0006860004,0.00017806033,0.00008304654,0.00007058401,0.000003905475,0.0000059945137,0.0002665345],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895036,0.000020724907,0.00053740945,0.00024632594,0.000079433,0.00016572968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983482,0.00046688825,0.0005009619,0.00056426314,0.000046523935,0.00007317832],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020653484,0.00011177855,0.0002699511,0.00007002683,0.00087376824,0.0022767927,0.00046060162,0.00006870666,0.00006482762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004391158,0.00006985663,0.00008196886,0.000010781548,0.00030038832,0.001224376,0.00024325227,0.00006877789,0.00008702371],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047447753,0.0000063513917,0.028750638,0.0000014111303,0.0000034776165,2.3567644e-7,0.00036404442,0.000007805599,0.0000032809653,0.0042369682,0.0012371183,0.9653412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00662735,0.00015125608,0.7018485,0.00003496517,0.00019212985,0.000082463695,0.005007404,0.010023657,0.00009035452,0.08372583,0.19162,0.0005960847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012691678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011132435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96474516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019515206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024411163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122750115","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2018.03.002","title":"Financially-constrained lawyers: An economic theory of legal disputes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Welfare; Social Welfare; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Public economics","score_opus":0.03168822734550531,"score_gpt":0.23643097709664612,"score_spread":0.20474274975114082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122750115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96316797,0.0020018932,0.00030554665,0.00013771669,0.005182555,0.00090330536,0.0046479325,0.00009216056,0.023560904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949784,0.0010384828,0.0005571904,0.0001203178,0.0019245662,0.0002182924,0.0002493319,0.00012776257,0.0007855983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951799,0.00006313738,0.0024137236,0.0016141344,0.000029190633,0.0006999001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631935,0.00009344605,0.0019963135,0.0012253395,0.00003262489,0.0003329304],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014670378,0.0006106335,0.0021241219,0.00038465232,0.0001745358,0.00037266698,0.0008420407,0.00079417176,0.0017185374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003272025,0.00088112557,0.0005317045,0.000030521125,0.0011017136,0.00060328905,0.0006110613,0.00043116108,0.0006427938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013622566,0.00027546054,0.10759508,0.0002548256,0.00035748477,0.000010807087,0.0012048081,0.00022216175,0.000017277582,0.8768328,0.0015107476,0.011582348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005225599,0.0013910299,0.2112086,0.0005195353,0.0006332217,0.00012038415,0.0015846529,0.0063046827,0.00058165763,0.6942371,0.07217708,0.0060164463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005802046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018019631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18259566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004747268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030891952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122888240","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2006.08.009","title":"Competitive burnout: Theory and experimental evidence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; CONTEST; Nash equilibrium; Hierarchy; Argument (complex analysis); Competition (biology); Economics; Pareto principle; Equilibrium selection; Game theory; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Repeated game; Operations management; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.04102717084791311,"score_gpt":0.34287770492071457,"score_spread":0.30185053407280144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122888240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96537995,0.015745396,0.0000018502992,0.00025904653,0.0008692901,0.00069685123,0.00012735666,0.00007067103,0.016849566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99497396,0.0022262123,0.00027892942,0.00007835528,0.0003009477,0.00037254812,0.000018019015,0.000030874355,0.0017201597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825215,0.00016727882,0.0003845497,0.00073746254,0.000075053875,0.00038352606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917287,0.0001667347,0.0002301837,0.00024377165,0.000019458046,0.00016699516],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059193716,0.0003384245,0.00051472883,0.000078327364,0.00047353483,0.00034552746,0.0002494092,0.0002658797,0.00031393097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013969503,0.00038258522,0.00011559515,0.000014223654,0.001210796,0.00026278646,0.00096434535,0.0002887552,0.000041746796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026667668,0.00065525767,0.4306252,0.00011371463,0.00019164513,0.00006825727,0.081099845,0.000033356857,0.0019813515,0.45500496,0.0025130971,0.02744663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041680606,0.0009641824,0.58144563,0.0023295747,0.001826168,0.00007670606,0.30057487,0.00008852996,0.015169574,0.019151637,0.065486036,0.008719028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014183598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00298802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43585333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005490119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000130994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123518364","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2018.08.006","title":"The informativeness principle without the first-order approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Function (biology); Mathematical economics; SIGNAL (programming language); Incentive; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Statistics","score_opus":0.06635935117543422,"score_gpt":0.3608886295150241,"score_spread":0.29452927833958986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123518364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98172843,0.00004650665,0.0062922863,0.0013697445,0.00026437588,0.00031778333,0.000012779429,0.000021563364,0.00994653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99426043,0.000018471022,0.00018098963,0.00018883117,0.00013560256,0.00019126711,0.0000010934486,0.000004542127,0.005018802],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992869,0.000033554352,0.00028382996,0.00017730289,0.00008460649,0.0001338401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990788,0.00021495865,0.00014486579,0.00046552924,0.000055290606,0.00004053755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011739947,0.000073945695,0.00009466947,0.000022438937,0.001067462,0.00031900013,0.0004511115,0.0000329844,0.00019861854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004745639,0.00003458432,0.00003652956,0.00008541546,0.0005436484,0.00021819638,0.00013281003,0.00006985454,0.0005668958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007903573,0.00009749793,0.20030932,0.0000033489316,0.000032832857,1.522273e-7,0.0073215687,0.00019708354,0.00001580538,0.2620825,0.009573391,0.52028745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012931088,0.000018364373,0.12933579,0.0000011136393,0.000011519372,0.00001444699,0.002783601,0.00246956,0.00006249925,0.0043198657,0.86077327,0.00008064778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016129976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058299276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85119987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015124071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027562375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82101625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125498752","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2015.11.004","title":"Social groups and social network formation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; Royal Economic Society","keywords":"Social network (sociolinguistics); Sociology; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social media","score_opus":0.02689530424112335,"score_gpt":0.2752261511530008,"score_spread":0.24833084691187746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125498752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99786377,0.000031652504,0.00013665807,0.00030270955,0.0001680547,0.00008767672,0.000031331016,0.000012078965,0.001366083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888146,0.0000042920765,0.000063080966,0.00005059935,0.0008141803,0.000024172286,0.000034813238,0.0000072992225,0.00012010341],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995639,0.000011921357,0.00013559873,0.00011207397,0.000024850415,0.00015165962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998274,0.000005664604,0.00006867281,0.000033123128,0.000012276258,0.000052890853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009257528,0.0000786459,0.00012821537,0.000011730123,0.00019571822,0.00009347956,0.000037533486,0.000041659707,0.00003163093],"category_scores_gemma":[2.2773999e-7,0.00008437299,0.000034609402,0.000012689631,0.000058122907,0.00019389273,0.00004587186,0.000061819774,0.000013936139],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024224488,0.000065479755,0.42330998,0.000012650192,0.000037934442,7.6756237e-7,0.009052946,0.00004430386,0.000017853008,0.39459947,0.010200746,0.16263363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003928416,0.00016502016,0.8162561,0.000018394474,0.00021522149,0.0000076050355,0.01451045,0.008325731,0.000022799626,0.07661014,0.07862678,0.0013133328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016928278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018777175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39294612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024586672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019799258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34406304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125879886","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2024.05.004","title":"Belief formation under signal correlation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Kyoto University; Seoul National University","keywords":"Neglect; Correlation; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Variance (accounting); SIGNAL (programming language); Statistics; Social psychology; Positive correlation; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.03303881041886576,"score_gpt":0.3153874025557272,"score_spread":0.2823485921368615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125879886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846875,0.0011711945,0.000106239466,0.0006424801,0.00072111725,0.00020898087,0.000018838491,0.00009784743,0.012345806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99747026,0.0004035507,0.000104631676,0.00005436063,0.00014811853,0.00006257132,0.000012068952,0.000009944608,0.0017344849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994128,0.000018033381,0.00019199448,0.00017594821,0.000035096007,0.00016614018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981356,0.000028365828,0.000036034482,0.000054281034,0.0000066520743,0.00006112155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017805629,0.00008077179,0.000098303535,0.000054789434,0.0002599619,0.00020812324,0.000053420692,0.00006552362,0.0004472771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000013871112,0.000086542714,0.000044597185,0.000024657393,0.0001327425,0.00057437835,0.00003560543,0.00006627031,0.00031559737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003428504,0.00019494646,0.106132634,0.00005354903,0.00008200674,0.000019403204,0.06943051,0.0005601615,0.0028648404,0.4091829,0.012448081,0.39899665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002286754,0.00063313806,0.3380831,0.00032719516,0.0008836487,0.0000863091,0.144736,0.016690668,0.005033614,0.020332634,0.4676091,0.0032978663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015708869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014534112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.455161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030410886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043794647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48973706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130729492","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2021.02.001","title":"Optimal and efficient mechanisms with asymmetrically budget constrained buyers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Budget constraint; Microeconomics; Valuation (finance); Revenue; Mechanism (biology); Economics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Mechanism design; Mathematics; Finance","score_opus":0.03081805682392607,"score_gpt":0.30129373016187994,"score_spread":0.27047567333795386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130729492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97672904,0.000071551076,0.020987995,0.00067739765,0.00009077383,0.00011935812,0.000050579758,0.000019599147,0.0012537008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886067,0.000017741842,0.009736855,0.00012609122,0.000021804282,0.00003523225,0.0000032726932,0.0000063435996,0.0014459713],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990606,0.00003362782,0.00025516812,0.00041086058,0.00009904466,0.00014070835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925834,0.0002319854,0.00009592615,0.00022825277,0.000049335606,0.0001361404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004126196,0.00009457642,0.0001806822,0.00008245424,0.0001534197,0.0002030075,0.00010378308,0.000047610687,0.00072032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056450393,0.000072212875,0.00003535233,0.0001332443,0.00017838781,0.0000723306,0.00007233096,0.00006752979,0.00008704621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012756557,0.00038845398,0.0120502,0.0000067031533,0.00006300207,0.0000661898,0.0009249144,0.0034005854,0.003335109,0.46545106,0.0014012351,0.51278496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013964176,0.0020000357,0.5644274,0.00009382826,0.0011316328,0.006276083,0.076242924,0.04014216,0.04823176,0.10964387,0.13338381,0.004462314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000071345353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009530276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5523772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017176977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060292372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78869987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135385542","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.01.007","title":"Honesty in the city","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Business Economics, University of Canterbury; University of Canterbury","keywords":"Honesty; Reputation; Trustworthiness; Field (mathematics); Control (management); Psychology; Deception; Social psychology; Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Sociology; Management; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06594454570867668,"score_gpt":0.3494827279642342,"score_spread":0.2835381822555575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135385542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98932046,0.00010010154,7.815615e-8,0.0015650777,0.00026788743,0.00021580627,0.000011123156,0.0000426549,0.008476837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834156,0.0004700601,0.000014400757,0.00011627222,0.00007873183,0.00014052688,0.0000031735885,0.0000054654,0.00082979957],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993823,0.000040120503,0.00013775175,0.00017022289,0.000034182143,0.00023541605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976915,0.00004935372,0.000033027227,0.000107071006,0.0000032255302,0.000038176437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004739773,0.00006910356,0.000113505725,0.000047709087,0.00025635466,0.00007962061,0.00015625333,0.000044974146,0.00012172239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000065854806,0.00005889267,0.000034914065,0.0000645435,0.00021760611,0.00013082982,0.000066163615,0.00006897363,0.00020982958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025951622,0.000028440281,0.9671822,9.724024e-7,0.0000020817085,0.0000073574297,0.01749907,0.0000012479604,0.0000413675,0.005689321,0.001296882,0.008248441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017342935,0.000015614889,0.9501648,0.0000028424515,0.000009651538,0.0000014239494,0.030101113,0.000007915175,0.0000283986,0.0004180824,0.01895578,0.00012096925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083648525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0125127565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017658899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009681432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027541406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157300277","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.11.016","title":"Large random matching markets with localized preference structures can exhibit large cores","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Janeway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Preference; Economics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Statistics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.031391282146459816,"score_gpt":0.23040248882529402,"score_spread":0.1990112066788342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157300277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99543375,0.0004206901,0.00036597086,0.00011067823,0.00044940563,0.00040822948,0.0008850201,0.00014758174,0.0017786619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965308,0.00015265243,0.000088050554,0.00009239499,0.000111428,0.0001109067,0.0000725962,0.00004700945,0.002794177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982071,0.00004030401,0.00057000254,0.00057612837,0.000027766207,0.00057869253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990958,0.00008797774,0.00031462076,0.0003507122,0.000010312895,0.0001405789],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009362002,0.0002610114,0.0006226845,0.00019747693,0.00022596208,0.00018125957,0.00021382576,0.00012830159,0.0008491642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018671064,0.00024985103,0.00009340524,0.00009518844,0.00006926651,0.0001728116,0.00011159651,0.00017690797,0.00032494485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049039454,0.00010498716,0.75671786,0.00017454247,0.00015510901,0.00004464362,0.004464598,0.00015982422,0.00004819605,0.23386547,0.0017311746,0.0020432158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013615828,0.0002351315,0.8745877,0.00018265154,0.00010923869,0.00011203363,0.0038775743,0.0033187747,0.00020590342,0.040459413,0.0616622,0.0016335599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038004425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005254586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19340606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006079947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022556995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160584640","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2024.11.001","title":"A recursive measure of voting power that satisfies reasonable postulates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Measure (data warehouse); Cardinal voting systems; Mathematical economics; Approval voting; Mathematics; Anti-plurality voting; Computer science; Econometrics; Political science; Data mining; Law","score_opus":0.03821358774914554,"score_gpt":0.2367149691258533,"score_spread":0.19850138137670775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160584640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96721625,0.020212803,0.000021578448,0.0002298459,0.002345087,0.0005306184,0.001164875,0.000075473064,0.008203469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683285,0.00032228575,0.00022612202,0.000026663307,0.00015278152,0.00010561754,0.000045137844,0.00007464561,0.0022138793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771,0.00003472125,0.0009726521,0.0008753551,0.00003185344,0.00037543033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983841,0.00010457109,0.00088778854,0.00049039326,0.000027785009,0.00010533418],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010198451,0.00039986425,0.0011233485,0.00028027117,0.000076256634,0.00021812574,0.00029988348,0.00044480895,0.00043475383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006107897,0.00045364315,0.00031698975,0.0000449357,0.00014201782,0.000103633596,0.00062376325,0.0005529762,0.00025430333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007435459,0.00010917803,0.48978308,0.0014068376,0.0006224744,0.000027384622,0.0067110495,0.0002051871,0.000062417195,0.4940735,0.002221871,0.0047026635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023864557,0.0006334877,0.46788415,0.00610981,0.00102127,0.0002961724,0.007116987,0.0019088435,0.0016076127,0.48516312,0.020764425,0.005107672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011767366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007454135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029616617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001423898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055673292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198288619","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2021.07.013","title":"Round-robin political tournaments: Abstention, truthful equilibria, and effective power","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Tournament; Ranking (information retrieval); Voting; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Microeconomics; Politics; Power (physics); Economics; Nash equilibrium; Majority rule; Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.016981974734616632,"score_gpt":0.2334617871221687,"score_spread":0.21647981238755207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198288619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893538,0.0013331991,0.00009148494,0.00029168394,0.00083054276,0.00022930591,0.00014204388,0.000031791897,0.0076961853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646807,0.000056050612,0.00008443916,0.00014475835,0.00013057534,0.000058809357,0.000014042647,0.000026415615,0.003016842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848753,0.000038584203,0.00054401206,0.0005217727,0.00001576204,0.00039231917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928606,0.00007807045,0.00018057758,0.0002493579,0.000016859112,0.00018909441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042531834,0.0001834485,0.00046051104,0.0000917702,0.00010678478,0.00023384443,0.00008394695,0.00012706633,0.0007783143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000395706,0.00021566363,0.000108629814,0.000038651364,0.00010423719,0.00027288892,0.00010158848,0.00013433106,0.00031252348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022263153,0.00012653763,0.2716681,0.000042255684,0.00008883506,0.00002511013,0.00047657933,0.000002257324,0.0003808499,0.7246855,0.00020522809,0.0022764795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033156485,0.0003285766,0.9046228,0.00011487247,0.00010955765,0.0005814156,0.0026117968,0.0003728286,0.0007283229,0.058787093,0.027340367,0.0010866971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016233182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001617045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6658984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013597487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017420942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8794508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206190221","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2021.12.007","title":"Efficiency in asymmetric auctions with endogenous reserve prices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Common value auction; Economics; Microeconomics; Reservation price; Pareto principle; English auction; Pareto efficiency; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Operations management","score_opus":0.09902865566673559,"score_gpt":0.32795777259724845,"score_spread":0.22892911693051288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206190221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951996,0.00013845223,0.0003057505,0.00027816257,0.00017655159,0.00023973678,0.000052486266,0.000021070326,0.0035881575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976099,0.000015556816,0.00015784451,0.000039859322,0.000030737705,0.00037175126,0.0000029930363,0.0000065117206,0.0017648599],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892503,0.000065912995,0.00031836503,0.0003749514,0.00014916953,0.00016658178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925625,0.00020890315,0.00014396096,0.000310635,0.00001744362,0.000062795705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092148164,0.000078125464,0.0001471188,0.00037479028,0.00044181303,0.000094755436,0.00031649362,0.000020659923,0.001148116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025504514,0.00006425987,0.000037115467,0.00057768024,0.00009057096,0.00016844975,0.00010879817,0.00013727446,0.00009846063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019931917,0.0014736028,0.56946546,0.000006068272,0.000028109454,0.000050488274,0.0048660594,0.040155124,0.00087462144,0.061083667,0.0031301414,0.31866732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029831608,0.0011848431,0.7011901,0.000008557197,0.00012725686,0.0014247973,0.044866268,0.0055350857,0.001390978,0.020679079,0.21941641,0.0011934465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023666598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001706418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3174739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008321404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005517641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234419312","doi":"10.1006/game.2001.0899","title":"Chores","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Public good; Outcome (game theory); Subgame perfect equilibrium; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Subgame; Wage; Nash equilibrium; Strategic dominance; Private information retrieval; Best response; Computer science; Epsilon-equilibrium; Labour economics","score_opus":0.04290621865019284,"score_gpt":0.20377446452504575,"score_spread":0.1608682458748529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234419312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9409344,0.003895156,0.000093979,0.00051114714,0.0006210539,0.00016315545,0.00018373872,0.000054152937,0.05354323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892745,0.0013693522,0.00027470387,0.0002007932,0.00018113026,0.000063248706,0.000005794723,0.00002843672,0.0086020585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987883,0.00000401569,0.00046695102,0.00043209182,0.0000066675216,0.0003019848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938744,0.00001800546,0.00016500692,0.0003011758,0.0000038190938,0.00012456714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016064888,0.00016049233,0.00035154365,0.00009867925,0.00009770537,0.00010844359,0.00015203163,0.000093631534,0.0066211857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000061626006,0.00019196073,0.00009839066,0.00002119051,0.00009301256,0.00026353914,0.00006972262,0.000093153125,0.0025104284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006697987,0.00008671061,0.122935064,0.00001219641,0.000039906783,0.000005137341,0.0007074918,0.00003586505,0.000012595476,0.8462215,0.0076454873,0.02229133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021386682,0.0001942867,0.12622483,0.000016979262,0.000046123565,0.000096640484,0.0004142058,0.010368773,0.00011533554,0.06654727,0.79239273,0.0014441502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025992494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033534812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78474724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007006822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000029050207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W43072628","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2017.10.028","title":"On the optimality of diverse expert panels in persuasion games","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Undo; Diversity (politics); Intuition; Parameterized complexity; Heuristics; Action (physics); Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.20858108475540685,"score_gpt":0.40601435257659113,"score_spread":0.19743326782118428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W43072628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962417,0.00002634145,0.000012815411,0.0011998585,0.00009966798,0.00015713385,0.000030499243,0.0000044928206,0.0022275029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902844,0.000045751618,0.000048676477,0.00007018718,0.000021722206,0.00004359494,5.686325e-7,0.0000034277114,0.0007376491],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922156,0.000051975298,0.00026991445,0.00025930651,0.000085841195,0.000111412926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986157,0.00034268046,0.00020826414,0.00077412836,0.000016182874,0.000043072123],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001019836,0.00007683929,0.00017316554,0.000045713467,0.00021940652,0.00014348133,0.0005597283,0.0000420881,0.000939039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015777376,0.00004740219,0.000063446394,0.000017946057,0.00029303195,0.00016690204,0.00016331894,0.00006898723,0.00013190084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019157297,0.0004461556,0.33075574,0.0000040125474,0.000014607034,0.0000068830386,0.008694733,0.0001441844,0.0044866507,0.14483528,0.0034285497,0.5069916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031602045,0.00004678598,0.976288,0.000012956055,0.000008770888,0.0000026981543,0.005182296,0.00028946702,0.0017147466,0.013529482,0.0025014395,0.00010732017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002596668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005440109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64553225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016758635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001610531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323659940","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.03.003","title":"Targeting in networks under costly agreements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Aix-Marseille Université","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Order (exchange); Payment; Microeconomics; Economics; Unit (ring theory); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Finance","score_opus":0.10627010221989372,"score_gpt":0.3750821985778426,"score_spread":0.2688120963579489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323659940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982814,0.000064520595,0.00025420927,0.0003408323,0.00018375236,0.00014308238,0.000011234596,0.000028634971,0.0006923036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974459,0.000063641026,0.000048339327,0.00011220052,0.000050356903,0.00006471316,0.000008896872,0.000006330896,0.0021996205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907744,0.00003775456,0.00033056285,0.00028646796,0.00006661448,0.00020113932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999443,0.00020542784,0.0000765543,0.00020423204,0.000009812565,0.000060995084],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010705722,0.00007150979,0.00013728403,0.00011364763,0.00008183069,0.000114084585,0.0002060433,0.00004510858,0.0006054699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026649936,0.00006205832,0.000032266384,0.0001661396,0.000053233303,0.00012570307,0.00010828554,0.00007489752,0.0010865921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020447329,0.00007869092,0.747923,0.0000018813593,0.000009454797,0.000009553129,0.0007122577,0.03127994,0.0004406648,0.013472727,0.02452265,0.18152873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003958535,0.000017489432,0.95107555,0.0000064354235,0.000010630348,0.0000030656201,0.003071104,0.019683491,0.000025827941,0.015478888,0.010053771,0.00017786292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004401595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005668425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20315257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024457915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011569548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380742245","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.06.002","title":"Motives behind cooperation in finitely repeated prisoner's dilemma","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Davis; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur; Indiana University; Purdue University","keywords":"Prisoner's dilemma; Altruism (biology); Dilemma; Economics; Inequity aversion; Microeconomics; Duty; Social dilemma; Social preferences; Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Game theory; Mathematics; Political science; Inequality","score_opus":0.046649300781613626,"score_gpt":0.33352122731834416,"score_spread":0.28687192653673055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380742245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950424,0.00011539978,3.3191222e-7,0.0005048581,0.00030680082,0.00033127496,0.000032228265,0.00009420044,0.0035725278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972664,0.00048824292,0.000051105646,0.00003645255,0.00007567949,0.00015818856,0.000026674283,0.000014608357,0.0018826263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902254,0.000049220485,0.00027722208,0.0003123878,0.000038649647,0.00029997248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968296,0.00004466,0.00006901307,0.0001107203,0.000013106644,0.00007955752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031464561,0.00011742138,0.00020247509,0.00012424195,0.00027190172,0.00012521994,0.00010323711,0.0000892352,0.00020478704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000212331,0.00013206307,0.00003883768,0.0000713552,0.00021125762,0.00033189595,0.000068566565,0.00008547378,0.00023145379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019928875,0.00009048424,0.9487465,0.0000039628862,0.000011440986,0.000019319205,0.029119667,0.000066336936,0.0010954352,0.004085212,0.001106379,0.01563533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076287723,0.00008409012,0.9677569,0.000020468857,0.000027199727,0.0000018101766,0.01812853,0.00020909292,0.0006427984,0.00012574057,0.011837289,0.00040318185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007409278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012622167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019010417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002041516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005171465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384207628","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.07.003","title":"A planner-optimal matching mechanism and its incentive compatibility in a restricted domain","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Stanford University","keywords":"Incentive compatibility; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mechanism design; Monotonic function; Incentive; Bounded function; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03621576031709306,"score_gpt":0.2445645924853198,"score_spread":0.20834883216822675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384207628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981572,0.00029498982,0.000042425425,0.00012584237,0.0002829252,0.00034263864,0.00025227075,0.000067459834,0.00043423168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992464,0.00010799948,0.00010576824,0.000025309659,0.000044888868,0.00007070866,0.000021429887,0.000019167202,0.00035832173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985838,0.000038184226,0.00055626105,0.0004885489,0.00001426663,0.00031894314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947166,0.00006415957,0.0002039409,0.00016640333,0.000005171164,0.00008868054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007406936,0.00016082804,0.00043336564,0.00025788517,0.00009366881,0.00008299533,0.00010803188,0.000110310335,0.000079165955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017552924,0.00019053656,0.000045553592,0.00011089006,0.000040967207,0.00019292094,0.00011504808,0.00015464377,0.00024365864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010709751,0.00013205549,0.40313485,0.00011569902,0.00004376304,0.000050300536,0.0083574075,0.0002187968,0.0003886915,0.5860553,0.0001309377,0.0012651421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018181611,0.00012604243,0.9039787,0.00007568979,0.000013457203,0.000027540565,0.002711079,0.008224882,0.00008762531,0.08156082,0.0008149447,0.00056103145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061871036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015341889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5044944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088301225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010690747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7769855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385813978","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.08.004","title":"Voting with interdependent values: The Condorcet winner","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Israel Science Foundation; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Condorcet method; Interdependence; Mathematical economics; Voting; Private information retrieval; Complete information; Outcome (game theory); Approval voting; Computer science; Social choice theory; Mechanism design; Economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer security; Political science","score_opus":0.0335670792132497,"score_gpt":0.2324053008551947,"score_spread":0.198838221641945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385813978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99110126,0.00023815074,0.000099200384,0.00038146361,0.000557529,0.0002446299,0.00007168004,0.000105917956,0.007200162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388653,0.00003040006,0.000026056177,0.00011862132,0.00019650298,0.00007020606,0.000012070779,0.00003253045,0.005627082],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883735,0.00003058123,0.0004320548,0.00037321667,0.000016740101,0.00031006653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999342,0.00007333566,0.0002322789,0.00027881938,0.0000067183946,0.00006679682],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011451178,0.00015804954,0.00030267754,0.000105680185,0.0001871811,0.00016091335,0.000217172,0.0000549035,0.00030144735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013472577,0.0001234312,0.000072387586,0.00006953333,0.00011829114,0.00013842824,0.0000993458,0.00014105502,0.0018365385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043737666,0.000056046287,0.7348601,0.000058617956,0.00014411981,0.00003146862,0.0052664997,0.00048971816,0.00004717974,0.24719794,0.003747346,0.00805719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032645834,0.00042210682,0.89217246,0.00018253179,0.00012077726,0.00029902524,0.010484873,0.009019039,0.00018928004,0.010712913,0.071592405,0.0015400237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021611493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056721146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23648502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047581103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008108961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386567471","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.08.016","title":"Student-optimal interdistrict school choice: District-based versus school-based admissions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); School choice; School district; Welfare; Mathematics education; Psychology; Medicine; Actuarial science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04810223679546384,"score_gpt":0.2958868116991121,"score_spread":0.24778457490364825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386567471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99244326,0.00037144538,0.00018429452,0.00040313895,0.0017422168,0.00041092906,0.0006279442,0.00025367696,0.003563115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666035,0.000036548183,0.000112538226,0.000115736075,0.0003121289,0.00021596694,0.0001455491,0.000054414395,0.0023467878],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977791,0.00003781222,0.00084268925,0.0007310775,0.00004144346,0.00056788273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982088,0.00022595201,0.00037646986,0.0005521891,0.000016653921,0.00061990647],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006220221,0.0003227505,0.0005786149,0.00040969776,0.0002663333,0.00028935625,0.0004004054,0.00018702277,0.0025851976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002516781,0.00036824352,0.00024470416,0.0002374375,0.00008380418,0.00022141599,0.00012987485,0.00029315,0.0043320917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019018518,0.00026719642,0.97689986,0.000071641414,0.00010464139,0.00002705925,0.00012505503,0.0018988821,0.000046182377,0.007881624,0.009571019,0.0029166462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051969467,0.00036429855,0.93613976,0.00007145331,0.00008643369,0.000004523244,0.00054099486,0.008297667,0.00007433339,0.00018228049,0.048165776,0.000875526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027988615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040043826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0407601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003090996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119118624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388915311","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2023.11.006","title":"Auction timing and market thickness","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Yoshida Scholarship Foundation","keywords":"Social planner; Planner; Microeconomics; Economics; Harm; Computer science","score_opus":0.108090870168461,"score_gpt":0.3702232223939331,"score_spread":0.26213235222547215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388915311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967529,0.000028837103,0.0003471428,0.00074805727,0.0002530445,0.000090826084,0.000017898565,0.000052505635,0.0017087877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98443586,0.00008334433,0.00009609969,0.000048817565,0.00007711258,0.000053712174,0.0000027742515,0.000005402657,0.015196909],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993575,0.000028860473,0.00019801,0.00026073295,0.000054037133,0.000100862104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951696,0.00016919598,0.00006882257,0.00017274595,0.000012927524,0.000059335118],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008365006,0.00005765938,0.000101007754,0.0000974696,0.00019313401,0.00013882348,0.00008885587,0.000042799737,0.0010416715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003402513,0.000049020473,0.000025132118,0.00009304835,0.00009002045,0.00019305237,0.00007031428,0.00004873895,0.00051146344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024057657,0.000024808995,0.07535598,0.000004534588,0.000008827633,0.0000027962694,0.0009267251,0.000102452155,0.0004985682,0.013649049,0.03259912,0.8768031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002819704,0.000021513391,0.83404267,0.0000057303405,0.000031326956,0.000082696126,0.004212137,0.004532839,0.00018110707,0.02832354,0.12807861,0.00020583578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001767213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001315726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8765972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011733553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009502647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396873968","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2024.04.003","title":"Efficiency and maximality in anonymous two-sided economies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Business; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02667816084570245,"score_gpt":0.24565911478874325,"score_spread":0.2189809539430408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396873968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851899,0.006071498,0.00004291146,0.00020756364,0.0007209114,0.00023430897,0.00012996083,0.00006662871,0.0073363287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980593,0.00027301555,0.000066595334,0.00004902533,0.00011032134,0.00006198765,0.0000061483343,0.000025116997,0.0013484899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984178,0.000020292335,0.00063695986,0.0006036611,0.000009179585,0.00031210497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948955,0.00009360225,0.00010779311,0.0002165663,0.0000031334205,0.00008935251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086812646,0.00018902251,0.0004471771,0.00024537276,0.00006581527,0.0002735938,0.00011181251,0.00009406189,0.00034850527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017975983,0.00021545142,0.000070252405,0.00005641075,0.0001267094,0.000287712,0.000075486896,0.00015325786,0.00039153095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020123987,0.00007005587,0.57630247,0.00013021367,0.000029806422,0.000032614804,0.0015617056,0.00007936577,0.00004715888,0.409479,0.00015123983,0.012096241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026231057,0.0002740036,0.873875,0.00027563114,0.00006389342,0.00035429728,0.0013943381,0.022215396,0.00017918786,0.06578571,0.03127442,0.0016850063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010258188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025864755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3436933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010916867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019003923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8785854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400881866","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2024.07.004","title":"Non-parametric identification and testing of quantal response equilibrium","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; European Space Agency","keywords":"Parametric statistics; Logit; Matching (statistics); Homogeneity (statistics); Identification (biology); Econometrics; Mathematics; Type I and type II errors; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Statistics","score_opus":0.03147506677851012,"score_gpt":0.26070528388417324,"score_spread":0.22923021710566313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400881866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982352,0.00060871954,0.00001244823,0.00013666514,0.0004018378,0.00016441614,0.000008986454,0.00005817797,0.00037351268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999448,0.00001855043,0.000065934415,0.000026926617,0.00011847178,0.000021667272,0.000006670712,0.000018564826,0.00027523426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992384,0.0000062648146,0.0002930056,0.00027372592,0.000042508123,0.00014611546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959666,0.00014122966,0.00009405967,0.00013103684,0.000023108707,0.000013917596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052369334,0.00011456747,0.00016157137,0.00035527511,0.000052576223,0.00038639695,0.000070661845,0.000046741494,0.0000818167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049238413,0.00011631146,0.000039293758,0.00018965636,0.00006242565,0.0006301441,0.00012044427,0.00007593572,0.00004401223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103762744,0.000034467757,0.7258238,0.00028941027,0.0000148329145,0.00001535713,0.00009033313,0.000004755106,0.036631357,0.00035660013,0.00032208028,0.23631325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019040967,0.000013176763,0.9859008,0.000069258174,0.00020185023,0.000019903366,0.00016212578,0.009955109,0.00048907154,0.00007662495,0.0027405606,0.00018107293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006812174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020133139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26007703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017377843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022227921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47430438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408997441","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.03.007","title":"Accountability in Markovian elections","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Accountability; Mathematical economics; Markov process; Computer science; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.031163730408584864,"score_gpt":0.3646085988382018,"score_spread":0.3334448684296169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408997441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819952,0.000042938642,0.000004851952,0.0011122581,0.00021964169,0.00014653933,0.0000036730382,0.000014890693,0.01645997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971885,0.0000100110865,0.000009075368,0.000066858316,0.000050114955,0.00006207829,9.605991e-7,0.0000015478755,0.0026108585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953765,0.000043893786,0.00012877124,0.00010794161,0.000017525848,0.00016419846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998409,0.00003686641,0.000015125092,0.00005679767,0.0000072958787,0.000043021835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023332021,0.00003545034,0.00007717442,0.000039374347,0.00011481343,0.00004572173,0.00003548554,0.000051566563,0.00021987202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016226002,0.000037199094,0.000018166373,0.00005232622,0.00007072527,0.00009142766,0.000009369806,0.000047800673,0.000017421766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033229562,0.00002351151,0.95119226,0.000003292329,0.0000013342291,1.4008906e-7,0.00040259812,9.581452e-7,0.000024246814,0.03885466,0.00027445238,0.009219222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090615846,0.000007027428,0.9764173,0.000006834214,0.000008262404,1.1109799e-7,0.00040914235,0.000024047593,0.00001905447,0.001737449,0.021230731,0.00004941141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087895624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18504903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097153395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017221844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075831456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91817814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411090032","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.05.011","title":"Favor exchange with private costs: An experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province; Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Economics; Microeconomics; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.0261088493348279,"score_gpt":0.3270830712383528,"score_spread":0.3009742219035249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411090032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786395,0.0008307748,0.0000054082766,0.00047468994,0.00032431964,0.0004697252,0.000020088175,0.00006992493,0.019165592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99554455,0.0005266403,0.00062819483,0.00021672618,0.00006128102,0.00037394487,0.0000069065018,0.000014138867,0.0026276049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905074,0.000035878256,0.00019434308,0.000365333,0.00004216268,0.00031156206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995728,0.000016689046,0.000067299734,0.00020233865,0.000012682503,0.00012817523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016850625,0.00015484924,0.00022829043,0.00006973094,0.00041521963,0.00015506941,0.00016942224,0.00006966563,0.0002417324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002193971,0.00015018001,0.00003543177,0.00003763371,0.00036223183,0.00032721358,0.0001076507,0.00006757931,0.000033305336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015944737,0.0006781226,0.7194655,0.000023110098,0.00010286866,0.000020200516,0.031916063,0.000004697962,0.0029169451,0.119013,0.002370056,0.123330005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054909196,0.0013076168,0.34604803,0.00020989958,0.00047343274,0.000011814544,0.1891399,0.00008196571,0.020867588,0.0007354112,0.43312755,0.0025058726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059032287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065561486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4307575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056317373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007404159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8923955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411200410","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.06.002","title":"Data provision to an informed seller","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College; University of California, Irvine; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Carnegie Mellon University; Concordia University; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Microeconomics; Business; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics","score_opus":0.04235075406590674,"score_gpt":0.29635429672421665,"score_spread":0.25400354265830993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411200410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99087876,0.000048758764,0.000034668643,0.00045282865,0.0004850042,0.00033520412,0.000022165295,0.00007374374,0.0076688933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967421,0.00002043268,0.000205639,0.0012228366,0.0001864083,0.00004185462,0.00012763788,0.000013529471,0.0014395607],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918854,0.0000032992743,0.00022374323,0.00035028034,0.00003539054,0.0001987556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993701,0.0000187553,0.000054828713,0.0005156921,0.000018347919,0.000022256687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021444239,0.0001292444,0.00015768729,0.00020541501,0.0001278353,0.00040011082,0.00032826295,0.000049501163,0.00045131918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016477201,0.000125041,0.000022190598,0.000088255736,0.00002227169,0.0012764236,0.0006009001,0.00007042023,0.00016917872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031598705,0.0000415231,0.40230316,0.00004210793,0.000006628196,0.0000021237393,0.000041877538,0.000002740368,0.00012506158,0.0005782965,0.009155706,0.5876692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034323073,0.000006928637,0.54093915,0.00003063357,0.00012731946,0.000001224185,0.00023401485,0.0014392985,0.000012462794,0.000049627888,0.45661435,0.00020174765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014040092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002136991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58746743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002140212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003964353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5099024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413275722","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.08.004","title":"Strategic mobilization of voters","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilization; Political science; Economics; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.02745795091573982,"score_gpt":0.2504414464481913,"score_spread":0.22298349553245145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413275722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97121626,0.000053350217,0.000016180198,0.00012437752,0.0001389717,0.00007979025,0.0000030289639,0.000020888834,0.028347159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993016,0.000016009351,0.00001268719,0.00029475614,0.000060087536,0.0000152355415,0.0000070696556,0.000003429673,0.00028911582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996003,0.000001385404,0.00016006529,0.00011510198,0.000016288031,0.0001068415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998259,0.000006038069,0.00006163523,0.000082644474,0.00001831343,0.0000054883494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000044857243,0.00006594342,0.000107789514,0.00008065243,0.000032444193,0.00009892817,0.00006005304,0.00003415992,0.00009946278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000018583339,0.000062195126,0.00002693272,0.000049072874,0.000075397,0.00035991732,0.000033015756,0.000028584336,0.000029178958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010713184,0.000036082038,0.13045037,0.00009967579,0.000010207195,0.0000013191935,0.000009114668,0.000071177536,0.0008971033,0.8607222,0.0002574832,0.0074345623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011472475,0.000038133607,0.7797213,0.0001419092,0.00035664774,0.0000023368996,0.004138649,0.005224653,0.0012753278,0.19905573,0.008335665,0.00056240184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068123476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006477651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66166645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009763259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021679569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25362435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414004406","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.08.013","title":"A direct proof of the short-side advantage in random matching markets","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Toronto Zoo","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Direct proof; Proof of concept; Burden of proof; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.015247064194296837,"score_gpt":0.23577293776521224,"score_spread":0.2205258735709154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414004406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656942,0.0012081433,0.00006854944,0.000104424544,0.00054297666,0.00040785878,0.000072403716,0.000011694302,0.03188973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698615,0.0000623597,0.000032874217,0.000045353543,0.000024093479,0.000076932985,0.0000017437588,0.000011818325,0.0027586445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988011,0.000038804905,0.0006558168,0.0002955608,0.000010679207,0.00019805573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993997,0.00009246446,0.00018425858,0.00029195036,0.000004305249,0.000027327884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009171169,0.00012795246,0.00047520487,0.00014726385,0.000055686647,0.000037435904,0.00019549472,0.00007588575,0.000078175166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028096701,0.00011666451,0.000116347226,0.00007356486,0.00006921937,0.000109279215,0.000095178795,0.00011491823,0.000011026595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106188505,0.00009769451,0.9365443,0.00012056244,0.000039376184,0.0000025546703,0.0007162522,0.00011615662,0.0001744084,0.05285431,0.00009613239,0.00913205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002333648,0.00003206113,0.9740584,0.00030465695,0.000042783988,0.000011693979,0.0007223235,0.0006025345,0.00248952,0.010834414,0.008181212,0.0003867619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032407505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022172612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042019896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006596908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022015143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47574407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414718675","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.09.006","title":"Robust price discrimination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Research Council; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation; HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council; Israel Science Foundation; United States - Israel Binational Science Foundation","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Regret; Price discrimination; Bounded function; Economic surplus; Upper and lower bounds; Market segmentation","score_opus":0.026563045718213253,"score_gpt":0.23574453619458868,"score_spread":0.20918149047637544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414718675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654605,0.00016323038,0.00014736036,0.0005391535,0.00058867905,0.00017470855,0.00000250809,0.000066490335,0.032857366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685144,0.0000337459,0.0000753597,0.00039391092,0.00014796433,0.000047680434,0.000014504593,0.000009658712,0.0024257086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994132,0.0000030892872,0.00017383888,0.00022296203,0.00002732434,0.00015961876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997521,0.000018365272,0.000066233144,0.00013705748,0.000018091343,0.000008140556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014473489,0.00010932333,0.00012935276,0.00017039245,0.00012635825,0.00026486476,0.0000938065,0.000044853223,0.00046155407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008764349,0.000109728055,0.000042375017,0.00007123241,0.000034018998,0.00052415987,0.00012300926,0.000067339315,0.000079995734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015149175,0.000048048685,0.6800867,0.00007618599,0.000009438515,0.0000031506127,0.000033510165,0.000010044987,0.00017441671,0.011004221,0.0029246334,0.3056145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032149494,0.0000021160922,0.93780404,0.00002839625,0.00018597205,0.0000016090199,0.00021121083,0.0008844103,0.000022940623,0.00024859363,0.060122177,0.00016704772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077677827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002905586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30544746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027732813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013489074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50536937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415653858","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.10.007","title":"Robust implementation with peer mechanisms and evidence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Function (biology); Limit (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Principal (computer security); Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.13319639062844002,"score_gpt":0.39706324065990833,"score_spread":0.2638668500314683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415653858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900865,0.000117910655,0.007205661,0.0018707383,0.000059093352,0.00019881134,0.0000137196685,0.000013101211,0.0004344696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940476,0.000031683605,0.0019601798,0.00014599902,0.000010249954,0.00008632945,0.0000017227507,0.0000030214483,0.003713235],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993099,0.00002433037,0.00020154189,0.00028997118,0.000076863085,0.00009740278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946934,0.00017316778,0.00007094712,0.00020431861,0.000037434973,0.000044809585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007098282,0.0000681155,0.000112280024,0.000071254566,0.000121263016,0.00020563767,0.00012625991,0.000025278208,0.0004695676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022630182,0.000050376857,0.000016266848,0.0000628276,0.00007040929,0.00023895646,0.000065013155,0.000039107752,0.00004341756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006118933,0.000044538287,0.16002257,0.000009302669,0.000019926672,0.0000021667156,0.0009001899,0.00015657872,0.002146065,0.28713322,0.0041468455,0.5453574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009048396,0.00015754711,0.8818185,0.000051828232,0.00016620824,0.0000325247,0.011222597,0.00075102603,0.0032303436,0.08938114,0.011960235,0.00032325575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007194764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002446657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72179586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016165535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003186903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5141436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415980035","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.11.001","title":"Preconvex games","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Axiom; Convexity; Group (periodic table); Property (philosophy); Transferable utility; Core (optical fiber); Regular polygon; Group cohesiveness; Axiomatic system","score_opus":0.023316871636977224,"score_gpt":0.2345898711109874,"score_spread":0.21127299947401018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415980035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433061,0.0023902163,0.00018111497,0.000335573,0.001262891,0.00024450143,0.000089677145,0.00007018544,0.052119773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777829,0.00016003013,0.00011054337,0.00020534024,0.000098194556,0.00009426251,0.0000066947528,0.000016733546,0.021525305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868184,0.000014643429,0.0005644744,0.00045346102,0.000008003343,0.00027757086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936306,0.000046476216,0.00018902004,0.0003224386,0.0000067595706,0.0000722363],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000464679,0.00016691299,0.0004259305,0.00018703257,0.00010100946,0.0001229943,0.00017925169,0.00012058863,0.00082868256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019315268,0.00019584918,0.000105269515,0.000052577652,0.000088894645,0.0001709914,0.00007384028,0.000116483505,0.0008494076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014908013,0.000060218972,0.46669924,0.000053143056,0.00005444835,0.0000021960936,0.0003236852,0.000011300065,0.00002848384,0.51596546,0.0027503264,0.014036576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016310173,0.0001032157,0.58851546,0.00009819743,0.000063797546,0.00003057891,0.000603264,0.0010116673,0.0004202857,0.05104714,0.35565096,0.00082440296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025916577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003408522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46491835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073151095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018166373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416410339","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2025.11.004","title":"Non-manipulable house exchange under (minimum) equilibrium prices","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de recherche du Québec; Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse","keywords":"General equilibrium theory; Economic equilibrium; Exchange rate; Foreign exchange","score_opus":0.03039949471677816,"score_gpt":0.2388877643784127,"score_spread":0.20848826966163453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416410339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9617476,0.0032253664,0.0005449876,0.0005456305,0.0012770871,0.00037360637,0.00014706716,0.000100145524,0.032038506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821811,0.00085316197,0.00027825954,0.00054045196,0.00015669067,0.0001493363,0.000012094573,0.000054342752,0.015774602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981108,0.000005059267,0.00070161524,0.0006946199,0.000011120958,0.00047679874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906045,0.000040143455,0.00026284574,0.000501441,0.000010406129,0.00012473977],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033801165,0.00026800667,0.00059612165,0.00024649396,0.00012200649,0.00021944412,0.0002868506,0.00017868278,0.0012199186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005999206,0.00032354385,0.0001435999,0.00006555937,0.000120423676,0.00043039166,0.00023825059,0.00014006026,0.0007275569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079946076,0.00027016396,0.14875561,0.00019364388,0.00023120284,0.000008957244,0.0010433678,0.00090206094,0.00015661225,0.8255568,0.015165225,0.007636408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066764345,0.00041871355,0.2998231,0.00015763743,0.00027409123,0.000042992415,0.002319425,0.018855195,0.0010208953,0.18458897,0.48264682,0.0031757269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008013691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010710415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64096785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001800936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034535497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}