{"meta":{"query_hash":"fdd51a68d7fc","filters":{"venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics"},"cohort_total":64,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":64,"exported":64,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/fdd51a68d7fc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Gaming+Law+Review+and+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W1661077792","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.1948","title":"Aboriginal Gaming Challenges in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.11295550669460834,"score_gpt":0.3270983709033963,"score_spread":0.21414286420878792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1661077792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34663224,0.04958971,0.0011389062,0.328588,0.0019528302,0.00029634548,0.0018641314,0.00007283819,0.26986495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84881157,0.03517206,0.0019294482,0.048717164,0.00051133183,0.00017619325,0.0004417134,0.00008047437,0.0641601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925604,0.0012184394,0.00032004504,0.00040265988,0.002619502,0.002878965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97417986,0.008345147,0.000925818,0.0004651764,0.011502086,0.0045819166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065265265,0.00034212883,0.0009045269,0.004010975,0.023662223,0.01371594,0.0035171073,0.0045557027,0.009289026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021740727,0.00055130036,0.0006643273,0.006499723,0.00699997,0.0022032443,0.0036141032,0.0074658995,0.00033680588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003639245,0.0002545701,0.070776306,0.001619113,0.0003743976,0.003154726,0.045514915,0.0025143288,0.0004606373,0.5291884,0.20595412,0.13982457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017250764,0.00017013714,0.16700658,0.005380012,0.00074386585,0.0011660052,0.13871449,0.0030999673,0.0008189785,0.06229807,0.6200583,0.0003711405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99623173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12398091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12398091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37586156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89954865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980009831","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.1769","title":"Ontario Court of Appeal Takes a Spin at Roulette: <i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp.</i> , 2013 ONCA 121, February 26, 2013","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Roulette; Appeal; Lottery; Law; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02047576640537435,"score_gpt":0.2381419362012918,"score_spread":0.21766616979591744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980009831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021237232,0.004076573,0.00091788743,0.13160267,0.0022836078,0.00048601994,0.008014754,0.00025736616,0.8311239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.085213006,0.0020710677,0.00095015846,0.05169552,0.0004240712,0.00018144971,0.0014092915,0.0000996173,0.857956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977125,0.00009150032,0.00005505972,0.00016548371,0.0012648648,0.000710609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974952,0.00029936768,0.000054009888,0.000066511966,0.0016812386,0.00040366084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017061658,0.00054084964,0.0004887371,0.0010913964,0.01963324,0.0048415414,0.001764595,0.008161006,0.036127023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004157379,0.00085647375,0.0008110382,0.0012402796,0.0020994921,0.0011442335,0.0011263009,0.0050220457,0.0047242464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056041765,0.000026974507,0.0031045796,0.00005599678,0.000018537947,0.00038912956,0.0010800932,0.000089243804,0.0005346245,0.029927803,0.95845324,0.0062637455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055561675,0.000020102636,0.020935338,0.0001245328,0.00006545654,0.00008906597,0.0016785031,0.00037470795,0.0005257056,0.002440253,0.9736121,0.000078633515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99702245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05810192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05810192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08093245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42156094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990479304","doi":"10.1089/glre.2008.12604","title":"Are Casino Games Patentable in Canada?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Advertising; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.11543179873105884,"score_gpt":0.31031883914602204,"score_spread":0.1948870404149632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990479304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19609228,0.05262053,0.0017376893,0.32931322,0.0026335707,0.00022628892,0.005426834,0.00019150802,0.41175812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.815317,0.02350164,0.0009876131,0.053092316,0.0008705703,0.00008731637,0.0010492799,0.00006387861,0.105030425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455535,0.00033005842,0.00015343068,0.00047482247,0.0024612236,0.0020251297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982841,0.0051161274,0.0011782106,0.00045812322,0.007527999,0.002878556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035800182,0.0003585783,0.00076389627,0.0029321332,0.007274786,0.008656199,0.0025090792,0.0068350295,0.014709203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022737902,0.0004408401,0.00072190806,0.003495427,0.0048012645,0.0025440352,0.001004814,0.0064926385,0.00060228317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064979354,0.00040192407,0.034913287,0.0005096031,0.00018317426,0.00078311027,0.0018483977,0.0011198564,0.0007416029,0.45560676,0.34237474,0.16086772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006185392,0.00025141536,0.16289493,0.0013292594,0.0006418512,0.0004686636,0.0048858835,0.0030130635,0.0020788207,0.07132429,0.7521868,0.0003064828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98253006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056074973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056074973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17290957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40685433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992773862","doi":"10.1089/glre.2009.13505","title":"Canadian Tax Structuring for Gaming Ventures","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Structuring; Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Tax law; Advertising; Business; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; World Wide Web; Value-added tax","score_opus":0.015480023257049795,"score_gpt":0.2109649916487863,"score_spread":0.19548496839173649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992773862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03857922,0.010672985,0.0009088628,0.049522582,0.0010046235,0.00022654506,0.0035386987,0.0001526568,0.8953938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59412354,0.010378268,0.0015795807,0.01448605,0.00045780843,0.000116185576,0.0017945234,0.000116922085,0.3769471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992867,0.000281011,0.00013395862,0.00039969757,0.004700787,0.0016175417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99214184,0.00059234304,0.000270658,0.00043945,0.0053964783,0.00115934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025511843,0.00042343585,0.00042715337,0.004843028,0.01071935,0.0062542646,0.0014495766,0.0029042016,0.015659766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01213907,0.000511646,0.00047188523,0.006321537,0.0025732007,0.0014027035,0.0016128271,0.0029356577,0.0014744918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036606187,0.000035511108,0.0060568415,0.00009261891,0.000016201413,0.000113233655,0.0011797446,0.0005086921,0.00033617506,0.50296235,0.44466984,0.043992206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021943904,0.000016047126,0.027074711,0.00021365195,0.000035687364,0.00008354124,0.00079426536,0.00063503365,0.00031539804,0.014130586,0.95661134,0.000067922054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98709536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08287048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08287048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15634747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60127026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025195404","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.1797","title":"Assessment Tool to Measure and Evaluate the Risk Potential of Gambling Products, ASTERIG: A Global Validation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Journal of Public Health; Art history; History; Political science; Law; Computer science; Health care; Public health policy; Health policy","score_opus":0.08754902457062169,"score_gpt":0.3714633990753765,"score_spread":0.2839143745047548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025195404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64698297,0.006321857,0.11212038,0.002630899,0.0014485684,0.011179251,0.052380946,0.0052941474,0.16164096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7868293,0.00274609,0.12159591,0.0013470023,0.00024137365,0.008031388,0.024760023,0.00058077706,0.053868163],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957526,0.0011747839,0.00049228274,0.0003652454,0.0020787502,0.0001363719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836558,0.007426269,0.0021224674,0.0012644297,0.0051374272,0.00039357744],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007085413,0.0012559892,0.00075494393,0.0044772867,0.000555941,0.001271221,0.0013945397,0.0014287566,0.016048193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02177063,0.0003881782,0.0020940965,0.0014823385,0.0005638653,0.0017132335,0.0020285356,0.0010078023,0.0071180076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034443997,0.002275946,0.44322312,0.0013708901,0.0006033458,0.00032150358,0.00064234796,0.002677456,0.004898888,0.004512624,0.054654647,0.48137486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090494164,0.0063627376,0.8680968,0.0016609364,0.0010488135,0.003471289,0.0010847489,0.014566535,0.01119994,0.008576886,0.08282953,0.00019684692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015633673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027223432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99291456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051913416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012646103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05368656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027819035","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14109","title":"Case Comment on <i>Canada v. Fischbacher</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Library science; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.020119470051829617,"score_gpt":0.2597711806890595,"score_spread":0.2396517106372299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027819035","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035174645,0.0013694101,0.00038907593,0.91766393,0.0053348667,0.00009885324,0.00083483546,0.00012629302,0.07066534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013167276,0.00048903446,0.00030097354,0.9414525,0.0013633819,0.00005658869,0.00012632192,0.000038571885,0.043005273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946852,0.0003841186,0.00018427648,0.0006486711,0.0023195008,0.0017783246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934608,0.003094439,0.00029913033,0.00019031441,0.001968988,0.0009863322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003854483,0.0009169928,0.001257728,0.0017122901,0.019342097,0.0076150424,0.006224784,0.06768042,0.013221317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014630614,0.0011455875,0.002076301,0.0025745914,0.006853832,0.0027573865,0.0020024288,0.02945606,0.0034042397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003391894,0.000015465199,0.00077057263,0.00003526053,0.000014177987,0.000575597,0.0007336049,0.00011079733,0.00022202652,0.034704935,0.96102625,0.0017574801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006586628,0.000032387314,0.0046401094,0.0002818767,0.000077439996,0.0004490288,0.0026320573,0.00060805125,0.00070152926,0.012452586,0.9779108,0.00014831792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8515004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92873216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14849961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028238136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0583746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29874825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037572661","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.15406","title":"Betting on Reconciliation: Law, Self-Governance, and First Nations Economic Development in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Corporate governance; Tourism; Colonialism; Download; Law; Political science; Sociology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.018668336604557793,"score_gpt":0.1931828018412585,"score_spread":0.1745144652367007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037572661","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040979646,0.32375315,0.00069679215,0.33248836,0.0022123144,0.00012038099,0.0017293788,0.000058593076,0.2979614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67031705,0.19701256,0.0010025799,0.040731605,0.0008752295,0.000113856215,0.00075039617,0.0000771586,0.08911967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919926,0.0009313615,0.00017639776,0.00041012868,0.0042450526,0.0022443063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988193,0.0030789012,0.0005162081,0.00030124024,0.0063086627,0.0016020208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050156475,0.00040771262,0.0007270094,0.004410467,0.012381964,0.010768174,0.0019319905,0.0039652465,0.007066458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016228896,0.0003589737,0.0004498181,0.008284183,0.009877738,0.0030197618,0.002228323,0.0042919195,0.00032922174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045653604,0.000055759458,0.011431439,0.0005000699,0.00006425885,0.00023121818,0.0057727313,0.0009474517,0.00012347204,0.5111597,0.39811242,0.07155583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030079653,0.000018690407,0.05393743,0.0028934842,0.000095999676,0.00008925602,0.009050109,0.0012932492,0.00029485754,0.033573408,0.89855766,0.00016579301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99702746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18648633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18648633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30235156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94356054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068762313","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.1635","title":"The UIGEA, Canada and the “New” Fantasy Sports","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fantasy; Download; Media studies; Advertising; Sociology; Art; Literature; Computer science; World Wide Web; Business","score_opus":0.03410074490607685,"score_gpt":0.3003339783601601,"score_spread":0.2662332334540833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068762313","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023272444,0.17687677,0.0010960082,0.43354875,0.006024844,0.00008073303,0.001023273,0.00006712443,0.3580101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37715298,0.12474913,0.0016074586,0.31904677,0.0032197128,0.00015114516,0.0006890542,0.00008988851,0.1732938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659866,0.00030348758,0.00009428336,0.00025459618,0.0017597099,0.0009891771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953245,0.0010682248,0.00022621578,0.00014715803,0.0018085176,0.0014252788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023158665,0.0004940298,0.00062140555,0.0022859788,0.006071016,0.0072585675,0.002447281,0.0075329323,0.012534971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008722443,0.00035336716,0.00064867176,0.0026357134,0.009158357,0.0024122086,0.0021336633,0.009495064,0.0005147888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010232622,0.00009145115,0.004852712,0.00030231322,0.00006285166,0.00023132819,0.00087888143,0.00041481626,0.00019570066,0.4634268,0.42265186,0.10678897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100562145,0.000044623248,0.025141079,0.0018482837,0.000103007995,0.00018101376,0.0022647877,0.0004872758,0.00017557059,0.03733948,0.9322254,0.00008883436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95760715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04239285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03528052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10802882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2559793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083064927","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14205","title":"The Need for the Creation of a Framework for Aboriginal Gaming to Legally Exist in Canada: The Compelling Case of the Mohawks of Kahnawá:ke","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.04639817410377368,"score_gpt":0.36883229695378544,"score_spread":0.3224341228500118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083064927","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058454778,0.035817854,0.0018604763,0.65658814,0.001176899,0.00016441388,0.0005270545,0.0000625807,0.24534775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85441786,0.013423937,0.002471347,0.07912547,0.00025357702,0.00011411628,0.00014450242,0.000053574466,0.049995568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862895,0.0019777315,0.00044050146,0.0007870095,0.005639957,0.004865302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98600787,0.004656925,0.0006424368,0.00059916166,0.005381351,0.0027121576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007361988,0.00041712905,0.00065860956,0.002000342,0.036617655,0.016144782,0.0030985123,0.0125089865,0.00464707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015467698,0.0008381938,0.0006318228,0.0021259494,0.022675334,0.0046456656,0.0054029296,0.014741102,0.00040198886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034746536,0.000042809374,0.003305085,0.00020045407,0.00003601619,0.0008807077,0.017950816,0.0006390439,0.00050636515,0.81393343,0.14709845,0.015372123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006840579,0.000045634093,0.02491498,0.0019310275,0.00017581778,0.000768106,0.0582985,0.0017352832,0.0009865386,0.1204875,0.7901607,0.00042748402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99089605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13084428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13084428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.348806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9493461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237818976","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.1844","title":"Legislating and Regulating First Nations Internet Gaming: The Mohawk Council of Kahnawá:ke's Experience, 1999–2013","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mohawk; Download; The Internet; Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09995682470612084,"score_gpt":0.318804350006779,"score_spread":0.21884752530065815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237818976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46102878,0.04680026,0.0016532777,0.18543094,0.0019826705,0.00045766763,0.0034722036,0.00023418819,0.29894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72165036,0.011659926,0.0020395808,0.034163572,0.00017230041,0.00028297,0.00084347697,0.00010333948,0.22908454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791163,0.00020690027,0.000113429305,0.0001384838,0.0006479093,0.0009816709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966736,0.0011906496,0.000379422,0.00011791051,0.0007821587,0.00085628306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023702562,0.00035436166,0.00028034672,0.0009777071,0.007234267,0.006910144,0.0016811577,0.005345915,0.0060753915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006696006,0.00091917923,0.0003770839,0.0015534562,0.0028111169,0.0026877401,0.003656645,0.0058198716,0.00070473365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049838674,0.0005079052,0.05128788,0.0010038863,0.00013527827,0.0024464836,0.021841604,0.0021055953,0.0048788,0.2619535,0.49010915,0.16323163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052212476,0.00004754898,0.18709786,0.0005458054,0.00006939773,0.00044649377,0.0149511825,0.0007194785,0.0017546493,0.003380266,0.79075474,0.0001804027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63508314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85914063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36491686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020023733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055561848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7341318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474419122","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.2046","title":"Canada's First Nations and the State of the First Nations' Gaming Sector in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.008102830885473972,"score_gpt":0.18196345054602955,"score_spread":0.17386061966055558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474419122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13089257,0.14866363,0.00085253664,0.25820705,0.0028193337,0.00009711657,0.0033233257,0.00007710026,0.45506737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8547274,0.05995822,0.0005273159,0.024202323,0.00053404045,0.000041009163,0.0005238256,0.00004518784,0.059440777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503267,0.00033368327,0.00012009985,0.0002616169,0.0019940005,0.002258013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897619,0.002019365,0.00050362607,0.00016963156,0.005581479,0.0019640448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025917287,0.0003594473,0.0006526765,0.0052034683,0.0141941,0.01564865,0.0021809537,0.004620007,0.0072322227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010407347,0.0004067815,0.0005583817,0.009352365,0.0076470245,0.002629082,0.0018621235,0.005123481,0.00022398947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006039422,0.000050950046,0.009871942,0.0004237243,0.000057310466,0.00024849985,0.0031828918,0.0013155235,0.00013197237,0.7959777,0.14977787,0.038901143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057967143,0.000038981932,0.091141954,0.0027588222,0.00021738374,0.0001626681,0.01390179,0.0024873626,0.00043749946,0.0486612,0.8398982,0.00023608442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99869746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22103167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22103167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39562547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90349287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556895110","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.2074","title":"Extending the Reno Model: Responsible Gambling Evaluation Guidelines for Gambling Operators, Public Policymakers, and Regulators","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre; Université Laval","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Public economics; Accounting; Economics","score_opus":0.4033227568449514,"score_gpt":0.47102305763055047,"score_spread":0.06770030078559908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556895110","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067482213,0.009797487,0.15322152,0.61458236,0.0042043338,0.0013194886,0.000615105,0.00084016775,0.20867129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26831466,0.0061838324,0.13670623,0.53536373,0.0056989277,0.0030255981,0.0004287541,0.0006067845,0.043671522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.788725,0.13804454,0.009460466,0.010801791,0.04410162,0.008866571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73481697,0.19733243,0.008189356,0.009050805,0.045937542,0.0046728873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17038411,0.0022919343,0.0032930595,0.0051412354,0.005261526,0.017533937,0.010276078,0.0458232,0.0074726655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2861612,0.0018756826,0.003387643,0.0017819842,0.019213473,0.017822335,0.008253928,0.029647937,0.0032921268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015747393,0.00015933931,0.001183166,0.00030523917,0.00010550423,0.00021822784,0.0012190759,0.0023194845,0.00027303075,0.8449433,0.1127755,0.036340605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045107302,0.00022513003,0.0023408704,0.002634198,0.00037132326,0.00027738741,0.0006767702,0.009636804,0.00090184505,0.7517749,0.23036236,0.00034735267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02759971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046095327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17038411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091221025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052331094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90108806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206557481","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16714","title":"Haghdust v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>B.C.J. No. 489; 2012 BCCA 120; 2012 BC.C. LEXIS 1071</i> <i>(British Columbia Court of Appeal, March 13, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Appeal; Lottery; Political science; Law; History; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019119153864819303,"score_gpt":0.24734969958107533,"score_spread":0.22823054571625603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206557481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009505996,0.005627147,0.0006019154,0.026346143,0.0005833842,0.00019712109,0.004061138,0.00023785894,0.95283926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06488077,0.0022001618,0.0007153371,0.032695737,0.000087295666,0.00022475803,0.0013303683,0.000068466834,0.89779717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979335,0.00019099667,0.00006482618,0.000139538,0.0010324941,0.0006386593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980532,0.00060110673,0.00007230826,0.00007480763,0.0009916549,0.00020685523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013411817,0.0006158506,0.00034873007,0.0017354195,0.012542493,0.0050381566,0.0017803498,0.0064689605,0.048883114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00428121,0.0008605443,0.0004601359,0.0017289863,0.0017376058,0.0013074521,0.0009885898,0.0035549523,0.009321402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005134678,0.000034152174,0.001728415,0.000098248245,0.000010076473,0.00017661342,0.0005783221,0.000119320976,0.00031314002,0.04875807,0.9350825,0.013049829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057860878,0.000031076972,0.016290074,0.00039456305,0.00004768261,0.00013956772,0.0013145417,0.000538127,0.00089767703,0.0052765673,0.97493017,0.000082111896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9098251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97762144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09017491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018633591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040091176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18141192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229673390","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19413","title":"Caesars Entertainment Operating Co. (Re) <i>[2015] O.J. No. 1201; 2015 ONSC 712 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 30, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entertainment; Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03101750018826518,"score_gpt":0.3015964477350956,"score_spread":0.27057894754683043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229673390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011736815,0.0011818787,0.00029087055,0.0061422572,0.00058271305,0.000082083796,0.0020520429,0.00032364673,0.98817086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056314045,0.00057520467,0.00019636337,0.0027452933,0.000081589424,0.00004015522,0.0006163308,0.000111402376,0.9900023],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988722,0.00004676933,0.000038554044,0.00010098323,0.0006885949,0.00025281718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895203,0.00013941637,0.000047879887,0.000056172827,0.00069679215,0.000107724605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006680848,0.00055391045,0.0002376108,0.0016483456,0.005998805,0.005126552,0.0011815329,0.0033277532,0.19255298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002413276,0.00070225575,0.0004890882,0.0012108802,0.0010323692,0.0017443076,0.0012120942,0.0031826363,0.0826993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015369265,0.000011398052,0.00031227118,0.00005394963,0.0000025398535,0.00005822241,0.00013606361,0.00003504752,0.00018438554,0.022673832,0.9674091,0.009107865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005340342,0.000004980818,0.0015703775,0.000067321904,0.0000047128037,0.000026414546,0.00018113354,0.00007181663,0.00022308913,0.0005339222,0.99729985,0.000010951642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5556493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79267997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44435072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069109756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010609609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8939352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229795280","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.16315","title":"<i>Pineau v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation</i> <i>Case No. CV-10-00399497, [2011] O.J. No. 4360, 2011 ON.C. LEXIS 9344, 2011 ONSC 5822 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, October 5, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics","score_opus":0.03211866439953598,"score_gpt":0.25939014346978134,"score_spread":0.22727147907024536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229795280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007996306,0.0045747324,0.0005170159,0.038611285,0.000711598,0.00025043433,0.0064643393,0.00016491879,0.94070935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10294102,0.003787987,0.0010091978,0.064489864,0.00035001544,0.00032687967,0.0027229807,0.00010874672,0.8242633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756265,0.00013983283,0.00007977912,0.00018680889,0.0012386783,0.0007922984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979316,0.00048323584,0.00014519319,0.00008210082,0.0010983567,0.0002595977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013265907,0.00057349226,0.0003512569,0.0015712685,0.013630898,0.004936231,0.0020561903,0.0059960512,0.03951311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044981535,0.0008419044,0.0006478652,0.0022287278,0.0024015433,0.0016644084,0.001179082,0.0029036836,0.0059905513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033362798,0.000018758039,0.0018852509,0.00008334208,0.000009594942,0.0002587816,0.0010427426,0.000058709764,0.0002654166,0.0615261,0.92941046,0.0054074675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003055092,0.00001933436,0.019721039,0.00020015452,0.000029267383,0.000118444885,0.0011240868,0.00024805445,0.0003892695,0.004079978,0.9739947,0.000045196826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95717305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04282695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03041915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04633986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22070742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231069132","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17510","title":"Haghdust v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>Case No. S105520, S113596; [2013] B.C.J. No. 16; 2013 BCSC 16; 2013 BC.C. LEXIS 16 (British Columbia Supreme Court, January 8, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Lottery; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0129013025445982,"score_gpt":0.21364379227761165,"score_spread":0.20074248973301345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231069132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005961807,0.0076350104,0.0004965932,0.07974092,0.0012202405,0.00014304453,0.0020711757,0.00017306971,0.902558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08886521,0.003775932,0.00078248786,0.21603408,0.00039073234,0.00027723485,0.00081882824,0.000088309935,0.68896717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997519,0.000323685,0.00007484049,0.00019690034,0.0011039332,0.00078171963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997813,0.0009988786,0.00007614538,0.00006782775,0.0008131342,0.00023103842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016814627,0.00066105137,0.00039410926,0.001485764,0.015913947,0.005655877,0.0021582781,0.013203972,0.030347133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060977465,0.0008051444,0.0005821607,0.0015104782,0.0030901297,0.0014471792,0.0012127721,0.007457176,0.0065637296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029649074,0.000016442718,0.0007432067,0.000068149806,0.000007833801,0.00021073935,0.0005709501,0.00009569287,0.00018081517,0.048039958,0.9439079,0.006128676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037083566,0.000020160522,0.006634099,0.00047401822,0.000037146216,0.00014067476,0.0014660114,0.00031487318,0.00056152616,0.007665318,0.982578,0.00007100938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8593155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9606248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14068449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021298511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037014995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28302598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231234638","doi":"10.1089/glre.2008.13111","title":"Bear Hills Charitable Foundation v. Alberta (Gaming and Liquor Commission), <i>[2008] A.J. No. 1431</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Foundation (evidence); Download; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.015426669396747698,"score_gpt":0.2679643827990066,"score_spread":0.2525377134022589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231234638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016236166,0.0055889697,0.0008444087,0.055828437,0.0011003355,0.00016798062,0.003179704,0.0002963961,0.9167576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.114888504,0.0029564914,0.0010300638,0.078120485,0.00030161053,0.0001237547,0.0013013309,0.00006944161,0.8012082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745375,0.0001545803,0.000062759034,0.00015650659,0.0012901922,0.0008821308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824023,0.00041348918,0.00008978306,0.0000525238,0.0009307571,0.00027315505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016038966,0.0005841216,0.0003504812,0.0015200588,0.013933275,0.00779519,0.0022402466,0.010434491,0.025491456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043320595,0.000898446,0.0005772587,0.0017957225,0.0026777226,0.00147477,0.0011212619,0.00450111,0.004029038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043115026,0.000049514943,0.0038335766,0.00008501134,0.000016100877,0.00031478718,0.0013797394,0.00019707362,0.00041208026,0.118997365,0.8643339,0.01033769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051357227,0.000045616856,0.027029864,0.00032044834,0.00006838282,0.0001428208,0.0027781557,0.00058762735,0.0009870816,0.011652733,0.9562348,0.0001010887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9290683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9808091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07093167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021242898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04058151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15412879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233329049","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.181012","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen and Lorena Lam <i>[2014] A.J. No. 428, 2014 ABPC 90 LEXIS 420 (Alberta Provincial Court, April 17, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Lexis; Art; Political science; Law; Biology; Botany; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018510656965219644,"score_gpt":0.26642897037290825,"score_spread":0.2479183134076886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233329049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050666984,0.0128895715,0.0012610722,0.18332931,0.008165345,0.00018054139,0.0016026712,0.00033849574,0.78716636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018505147,0.0012883524,0.00032610615,0.049246218,0.0004642676,0.00004747068,0.00017259743,0.00008813767,0.92986184],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981287,0.00018705346,0.000045623536,0.0002931428,0.000725229,0.0006202964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802643,0.0006846648,0.00007139255,0.000078526406,0.00076573266,0.0003731904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017720137,0.00053546013,0.00048595166,0.0009232053,0.017492281,0.007828183,0.0016031228,0.0074965507,0.076955214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069489493,0.0006875264,0.00049045164,0.00089457474,0.0025287552,0.0023788172,0.0024596083,0.0094665475,0.017683493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022769804,0.000010306291,0.00038119373,0.00003144529,0.000005465013,0.0001631672,0.0007430416,0.000025105039,0.0001344506,0.037908636,0.95380604,0.0067682974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070945916,0.0000085237625,0.0017824725,0.00013296101,0.0000053362833,0.00007806735,0.001426503,0.000049286966,0.00020839392,0.0028895405,0.9933888,0.000023010252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5368219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81648034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5368219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011147966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018931145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9318117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233389050","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.16314","title":"<i>Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba Ltd.</i> <i>[2011] M.J. No. 305; 2011 MBQB 225, 2011 MB.C. LEXIS 845 (Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Centre, September 16, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Lexis; General partnership; Art; Humanities; Political science; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0326076102925209,"score_gpt":0.2605759400749266,"score_spread":0.22796832978240572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233389050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010006438,0.005275356,0.0008330785,0.043021746,0.00093330175,0.00022242295,0.003081293,0.0002231347,0.9364032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06598325,0.002720198,0.0008407531,0.064795695,0.00016221717,0.00025903698,0.0009623864,0.00007454617,0.8642019],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985738,0.00015153707,0.000046779845,0.00012740844,0.0006087372,0.0004917669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817395,0.00043453116,0.000114243376,0.00006211102,0.0009956604,0.00021954766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013489011,0.0006987223,0.00026980232,0.0016292459,0.0116410395,0.0052837864,0.001992742,0.005550483,0.035477567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034016052,0.0009910219,0.0005776676,0.0020459353,0.0018164781,0.00173061,0.0012089913,0.0032410028,0.008109402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044229375,0.000035461195,0.0029408124,0.00014554862,0.000018083225,0.000320638,0.0014798457,0.0001254094,0.00043125375,0.10145102,0.8823798,0.010627864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031059924,0.00003151071,0.012501535,0.00030911306,0.00003644825,0.00013596869,0.0017975884,0.00029926,0.00078713364,0.0030885774,0.98093224,0.000049586022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.855674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9647391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14432597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014416605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035471197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2903518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233760448","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20910","title":"Paton Estate v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Commission (c.o.b. Fallsview Casino Resort)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Estate; Commission; Download; Real estate; Advertising; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02501758896512817,"score_gpt":0.26404554970336713,"score_spread":0.23902796073823895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233760448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030136513,0.00429126,0.00070593244,0.025078397,0.00039420504,0.0002028081,0.0027633654,0.00012428936,0.9363032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17177783,0.0023545055,0.00069414475,0.01292908,0.00011405114,0.00009428986,0.00070422457,0.00003653475,0.8112954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859697,0.000058922717,0.000028185954,0.000088822286,0.0008293321,0.00039772099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988575,0.00019797472,0.00005397143,0.000032528536,0.0006206741,0.0002373387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007228326,0.0002831838,0.0001947253,0.0008295386,0.012041401,0.0037276098,0.00085051707,0.0031774712,0.03698355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023255243,0.0005066755,0.00030854187,0.0010865052,0.001540506,0.00082298956,0.0007980182,0.001710681,0.0031590597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065400935,0.00004260544,0.0113968775,0.000117932155,0.000013567157,0.0006777246,0.0016931072,0.00016236732,0.00089696655,0.07197611,0.8842387,0.028718678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005909832,0.000035165893,0.057059616,0.00018742758,0.000047038495,0.00024456333,0.0015610441,0.00057104137,0.000912089,0.003842861,0.93543136,0.00004862784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95556796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99331784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044432044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02129945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035788823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15453905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235003937","doi":"10.1089/glre.2008.13112","title":"B-Filer, Inc. v. TD Canada Trust, <i>[2008] A.J. No. 1397</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.009243825721817865,"score_gpt":0.17507994017470252,"score_spread":0.16583611445288465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235003937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01169509,0.006194891,0.0012721489,0.06970688,0.0013943596,0.00022359019,0.006586005,0.00048197433,0.9024451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07073885,0.0024052737,0.0007241487,0.0563191,0.00019152198,0.00012498994,0.0014391929,0.00014883548,0.8679081],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997209,0.000120368044,0.000086281805,0.00017870285,0.0014993602,0.0009062518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996214,0.00077333016,0.00013472166,0.000097601114,0.0023039896,0.00047638785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013900091,0.00054774183,0.00035155204,0.0013994497,0.0129449675,0.00637692,0.0020456403,0.009402911,0.049365085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069163055,0.0008944281,0.0007135618,0.0014589896,0.0016205482,0.0023510957,0.0010972453,0.005137744,0.011207421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003894065,0.00002350643,0.0019854882,0.00007229464,0.000008750159,0.00021240111,0.0005474092,0.00007894454,0.0003442429,0.050539497,0.9389304,0.0072180256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003538739,0.000037980702,0.010027476,0.0002174304,0.000041708314,0.00016972913,0.0012695183,0.00033180477,0.0008436302,0.004270886,0.9826881,0.00006639352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9037622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9705413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9037622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018251013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049172353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19360906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235758395","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.19112","title":"Ross v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>[2014] B.C.J. No. 612, 2014 BCSC 320, 2014 BC.C. LEXIS 975 (British Columbia Supreme Court, March 5, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Supreme court; Lottery; Law; Columbia university; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Media studies","score_opus":0.01979959897980959,"score_gpt":0.23882911682620184,"score_spread":0.21902951784639224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235758395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005757245,0.009506233,0.00045393498,0.10706364,0.0017055372,0.0001739267,0.0027736255,0.000208137,0.8723578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059145305,0.0041917767,0.0007104683,0.23397288,0.00045987545,0.00030272634,0.0009648186,0.00009679702,0.7001553],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978816,0.00026291274,0.00007086412,0.00017574332,0.0009380882,0.0006706813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797076,0.0008213789,0.00007603268,0.000053337644,0.00087167526,0.00020678193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015223788,0.0007963572,0.000448555,0.0015590941,0.0147952745,0.0057642977,0.0020945182,0.012613475,0.033843484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006233122,0.000860041,0.0006446271,0.0015752345,0.0027084025,0.0014225771,0.0011057714,0.0074541103,0.007833139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022214583,0.000012027824,0.00044963387,0.000059661837,0.0000054567304,0.00012328725,0.00040422135,0.000060955765,0.0001581772,0.030232666,0.96357095,0.004900716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035905716,0.000019427696,0.005684071,0.00045868324,0.00002931713,0.00009813329,0.0011332292,0.00023305023,0.0004869776,0.0049960827,0.9867612,0.000063915344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8631794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9620813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13682061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021951808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03277655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2752527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236156617","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19311","title":"Majewski v. Complex Services, Inc. <i>[2015] O.J. No. 272; 2015 ON.C. LEXIS 271 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 21, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.043939828973301454,"score_gpt":0.30508930869622986,"score_spread":0.2611494797229284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236156617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008366428,0.0031611521,0.000766098,0.029585615,0.0005074896,0.00018082438,0.0030769475,0.00017816176,0.9541772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.112782955,0.0030542142,0.0014474978,0.058292456,0.00026820356,0.0003852442,0.0015665473,0.00012145852,0.8220813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849486,0.00011700267,0.00007970706,0.00013953104,0.00080068986,0.00036808156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987299,0.0004928451,0.00010387206,0.00005309284,0.00043710525,0.0001833011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011689344,0.0005101721,0.00023749437,0.0014315847,0.00845512,0.0047045485,0.001238332,0.0043754554,0.045905627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051050275,0.0008289957,0.00059053226,0.0010616244,0.0016097832,0.0018533062,0.0014530974,0.0035711776,0.009584461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050216782,0.000027249638,0.0016486425,0.00011420423,0.0000082417355,0.00018060337,0.0008646334,0.00007106016,0.00045596994,0.18449965,0.8013471,0.010732518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044888555,0.00002673474,0.009455123,0.00032751577,0.000029421175,0.00017349467,0.0006382631,0.0004129501,0.00067610457,0.008249391,0.9799217,0.000044380227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5092437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81662476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5092437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009213883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017226083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237992252","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14310","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 212 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Political science; Volume (thermodynamics); Humanities; Library science; Media studies; Law and economics; Art; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.0355278059403537,"score_gpt":0.25742701748253416,"score_spread":0.22189921154218045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237992252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03604845,0.0058643287,0.00073063077,0.07850953,0.0011488002,0.00020231209,0.0026644943,0.00010676034,0.8747247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16157706,0.0035025198,0.00057981396,0.053241674,0.00018514515,0.00013462879,0.0006615586,0.000056541514,0.78006107],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880755,0.00006854294,0.000027233731,0.00009729076,0.0005058467,0.0004935883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988387,0.0002630101,0.000050541687,0.00003771765,0.00058216136,0.000227988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009741775,0.0004136527,0.0002699047,0.0006901329,0.018378131,0.004925172,0.0012790577,0.0070055667,0.017352419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034185313,0.00055825885,0.0003979025,0.0008922406,0.002109986,0.0014702309,0.0009831631,0.003522717,0.001707261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007007269,0.000037998147,0.008965408,0.00014761569,0.000020267069,0.00085191324,0.005334707,0.00014268458,0.0008537342,0.11146428,0.86096257,0.011148671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025241494,0.000026962454,0.030174091,0.0002253168,0.000059237773,0.00015224368,0.0052832,0.0002732943,0.0010239979,0.0041824593,0.9585112,0.00006279819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96049106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03950894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027333621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049624745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19832021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238408455","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19411","title":"Merpaw v. Hyde (c.o.b. City Limits Convenience) <i>[2015] O.J. No. 800; 2015 ONSC 1053 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, February 20, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Humanities; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05733022544795584,"score_gpt":0.3092049537484531,"score_spread":0.25187472830049723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238408455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009743629,0.0034015144,0.00094060716,0.024351357,0.000496564,0.00012425662,0.0014378125,0.00015075871,0.9593535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.083478965,0.0022610615,0.0008119779,0.032306597,0.00015317496,0.00012249006,0.0005033199,0.000086219676,0.8802762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898773,0.00009717922,0.00003657427,0.000117104195,0.00044742573,0.00031402882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989052,0.00033582986,0.00007347581,0.00005334392,0.0004530142,0.00017923981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009098107,0.00035306293,0.00024648933,0.0006941421,0.0075561106,0.0042916927,0.0010685399,0.0047601964,0.05338685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035639852,0.00072391005,0.00039152917,0.0008030227,0.0014157069,0.0018918476,0.001425678,0.0032933096,0.007871227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038282586,0.000023190794,0.0021172834,0.00009684492,0.000008104976,0.00022907031,0.0011136916,0.00006841428,0.0003291024,0.14785978,0.8371246,0.010991585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020123822,0.000019001644,0.0071941274,0.00016900033,0.00002174568,0.00011820616,0.00071895047,0.0001952002,0.0005648925,0.003490261,0.9874622,0.00002618733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5027984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8127381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49720162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064004543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01076112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238753586","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19310","title":"Edgewater Casino v. Chubb-Kennedy <i>[2015] B.C.J. No. 32; 2015 BCCA 9; 2015 BC.C. LEXIS 34 (British Columbia Court of Appeal, January 13, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Appeal; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025307861219641,"score_gpt":0.28011216233711034,"score_spread":0.2548043011174693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238753586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042915377,0.0026512633,0.00044470778,0.01670619,0.00039498732,0.0001286934,0.0010696406,0.000110073204,0.97420293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09570738,0.0028244904,0.0009657693,0.0733358,0.00026737797,0.00033663024,0.0008964923,0.0001040037,0.825562],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982634,0.00018725399,0.000060487124,0.00020341742,0.0007486232,0.0005367788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858105,0.00052518636,0.0000874084,0.000057830806,0.00058479054,0.00016373952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012333926,0.0005478071,0.00029843833,0.0015545647,0.010134143,0.0062658926,0.0016543446,0.006681528,0.04432137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049322858,0.0005797344,0.00046698473,0.0012463126,0.0018211233,0.0018615066,0.001372272,0.003661537,0.010089344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028590368,0.000027847462,0.000926381,0.00008311829,0.0000067094015,0.00016457816,0.0006965346,0.00007176125,0.00024309159,0.1420562,0.8458221,0.009873084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024127276,0.000022409815,0.006976787,0.00036796072,0.000024047175,0.00012162232,0.0009259976,0.00023674752,0.00064462697,0.007794385,0.9828204,0.000040835348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4445075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7308784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5554925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008052418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0131260585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8838404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239787302","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20212","title":"Babstock v. Atlantic Lottery Corp. <i>[2015] N.J. No. 299, 2015 NLTD(G) 116, Docket: 201201G2257 (Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court Trial Division—General Division, September 3, 2015)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Supreme court; Division (mathematics); Law; Political science; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.016800330589375436,"score_gpt":0.2714741729619923,"score_spread":0.25467384237261687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239787302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004761918,0.0077406904,0.00071888557,0.15066776,0.0022675816,0.00013888726,0.002110464,0.00020893815,0.8313849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06091216,0.0045868093,0.0008323134,0.4647704,0.001255402,0.0002348688,0.0008466549,0.00010143995,0.4664599],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974033,0.00040551845,0.0001293824,0.00025727402,0.00100371,0.0008007831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618524,0.0022514523,0.00019079703,0.00009251064,0.0009350233,0.00034490478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030147487,0.0006502306,0.0004695779,0.0012865737,0.011206934,0.007863377,0.0025797838,0.013571104,0.03803755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009159049,0.00078791403,0.0007881825,0.0014981227,0.0029864118,0.002660957,0.0015607012,0.0095824115,0.009861321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027909124,0.00001979306,0.00045149185,0.00007646301,0.000007973337,0.00014493342,0.00043549514,0.000046437483,0.00015457124,0.06892233,0.9243358,0.005376922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006757105,0.000040309933,0.0052175433,0.0006942958,0.000046871915,0.00013822498,0.0010427296,0.00029699603,0.00054108485,0.009404789,0.982452,0.000057615405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3657571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66091865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6342429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009716494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015282814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7272563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240039888","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18615","title":"Nova Growth Corp. v. Kepinski <i>2014 CarswellOnt 6335, 2014 ONSC 2763 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice [Commercial List], May 12, 2014</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Download; Economic Justice; CITES; Law; Humanities; Politics; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.02529310089975424,"score_gpt":0.2676874636780195,"score_spread":0.24239436277826526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240039888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010326949,0.0014332721,0.0004724384,0.019314101,0.00036855208,0.00016852187,0.003942309,0.00009864145,0.9638751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057247624,0.0011874642,0.0006485113,0.02109036,0.000100400095,0.00013459999,0.001809215,0.000061041326,0.91772085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973232,0.00015078198,0.000084150895,0.00023188588,0.0014351655,0.0007748667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975485,0.00038472947,0.00010340949,0.000070065646,0.001627686,0.00026546043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013354154,0.00056399294,0.0002596004,0.0015232916,0.012784054,0.0050448063,0.0015777008,0.004697895,0.04399895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004541216,0.00077636505,0.0005347148,0.0012768247,0.0017403566,0.0018240581,0.0014033321,0.0037647055,0.009158244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050173843,0.000034084696,0.0035966476,0.00009059397,0.000010576129,0.0002586486,0.0009305322,0.00012766369,0.0005465177,0.09310636,0.8912645,0.009983734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029017408,0.000022819984,0.016902871,0.00017957801,0.000024946316,0.00013044573,0.001148253,0.0003553802,0.00081935304,0.00442808,0.975904,0.000055242414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8642535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97719884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13574648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023451565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03537131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2730918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240456741","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17911","title":"Dennis v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming CorpCase No. C55923, [2013] O.J. No. 3468; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 3610; 2013 ONCA 501 (Ontario Court of Appeal, July 31, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Appeal; Lexis; Art; Humanities; Download; Advertising; Art history; Political science; Law; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.024288057881616046,"score_gpt":0.24798813914238224,"score_spread":0.22370008126076618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240456741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012081527,0.004124055,0.0007492864,0.01711952,0.00037711102,0.00025906748,0.006033322,0.00014191747,0.95911413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08739591,0.0024652346,0.00095845025,0.014355675,0.000119363394,0.00019828032,0.001579175,0.000050080125,0.89287794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997858,0.00008625993,0.0000512259,0.00014248712,0.0012984462,0.0005635126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842876,0.00024475026,0.00006607768,0.00004558445,0.00096887694,0.0002459548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012187706,0.00056049705,0.00028811765,0.0012820447,0.0151398545,0.0038208175,0.001274282,0.004018581,0.052911095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003558361,0.0008686011,0.00049743557,0.0015159183,0.001670418,0.0012562446,0.0009852283,0.0019566761,0.005946673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007531568,0.000033095836,0.005465231,0.00013120951,0.000013982645,0.00027931124,0.0011862392,0.00012118588,0.0004984925,0.0866248,0.8910212,0.014549911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007198797,0.000028924007,0.030325059,0.00020456873,0.000044154425,0.00015119482,0.000994833,0.00040746137,0.00056798424,0.004411192,0.96273077,0.00006194481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99501723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052911095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031745236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05937664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23032892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240459957","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14311","title":"Seguin v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 170 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Library science; Political science; Computer science; Physics; World Wide Web; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.015768754411924858,"score_gpt":0.24965488114398846,"score_spread":0.2338861267320636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240459957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017407851,0.0075275996,0.0005164504,0.036672022,0.00065363565,0.00015912745,0.004783556,0.0001445769,0.93213516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.112153746,0.0045310715,0.00092061976,0.03780114,0.00016386845,0.0001237619,0.0014623235,0.00008302168,0.84276044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843603,0.00008502205,0.000041164116,0.00010530931,0.00079255394,0.00053986564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987445,0.00020252606,0.000078288045,0.00004582407,0.00070364354,0.0002250924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008766109,0.00050061016,0.0002520115,0.0010734587,0.013993854,0.0048331055,0.0013887685,0.005285737,0.028750228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031114446,0.00064773153,0.0005314522,0.0021384931,0.0026043553,0.0014180623,0.0009870209,0.0022216823,0.003539877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005146498,0.000022886568,0.005810205,0.00016706744,0.000012845084,0.0003246828,0.0031604993,0.00012234051,0.0005668955,0.10147734,0.8771664,0.0111174015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023614233,0.000019896766,0.024340976,0.0001823647,0.000034105593,0.00008264767,0.0020175732,0.00013002676,0.00039733504,0.0041022664,0.96862876,0.000040338455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9844169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035510723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035510723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06433842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25764948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241392334","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.151113","title":"Loveless v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>[2011] O.J. No. 3783; 2011 ON.C. LEXIS 6128; 2011 ONSC 4744 (August 20, 2011)</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Lottery; Download; Art; Advertising; Business; Humanities; World Wide Web; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.041678359557531075,"score_gpt":0.22954675399185226,"score_spread":0.18786839443432118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241392334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006439497,0.007987839,0.00042114215,0.07423484,0.0008697874,0.00014034906,0.0020396037,0.00009876381,0.907768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.083537824,0.0053082732,0.00048202794,0.13023663,0.0005388898,0.00019968627,0.00068531226,0.000067644054,0.77894384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978714,0.00017758382,0.00005830715,0.0001308244,0.0011040114,0.0006578116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807847,0.0006538417,0.00010561389,0.00005456431,0.00081151625,0.00029589373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015042789,0.0006090997,0.00038958047,0.0009761122,0.017512642,0.004478737,0.0020426132,0.009342271,0.02851448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046860417,0.0009085905,0.0006268707,0.0013037887,0.003244552,0.0017200181,0.001105869,0.0049136477,0.0044557597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002896687,0.000014494387,0.0014470762,0.00009370876,0.000007730354,0.00019203087,0.0015652438,0.000052263633,0.00021467668,0.058140643,0.9333134,0.0049298285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003450408,0.000020798116,0.008727888,0.0002713335,0.000031279247,0.00009330763,0.0013974931,0.00015514024,0.00036463645,0.0030423691,0.98582226,0.000038876824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9275794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9874621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0724206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030772489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04007492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22327113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241511357","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17717","title":"Manitoba Jockey Club v. ManitobaCase No. CI13-01-82759, [2013] M.J. NO. 135, 2013 MBQB (Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Centre, May 6, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Club; Political science; Art; Law; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.01608432383982389,"score_gpt":0.24306526855072588,"score_spread":0.226980944710902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241511357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02671638,0.015397642,0.0012995157,0.060096618,0.0014647504,0.0005859144,0.0075243916,0.00027309702,0.88664174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.086914286,0.0061240983,0.0013012802,0.06149384,0.0001601693,0.00043273723,0.0012668326,0.00007163063,0.84223515],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986733,0.00011715736,0.00003977906,0.00014798447,0.00057476794,0.00044707552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823254,0.00031608337,0.00010366401,0.000056633566,0.00095141464,0.00033972913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016065325,0.0007099542,0.0002947165,0.0013656105,0.012864111,0.0048948056,0.0020689436,0.005381688,0.032813672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004243241,0.0011701743,0.00043707475,0.0018268722,0.0018311082,0.0013115729,0.0014161835,0.0039187637,0.006716271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012858609,0.00009411471,0.008687164,0.00027751163,0.00003442926,0.0008797066,0.0018457712,0.00018772829,0.0013671949,0.087253615,0.8824582,0.016786003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000933301,0.000070537586,0.029512143,0.0006020129,0.00009122978,0.00036139946,0.0023484654,0.0003887779,0.0013033084,0.003829104,0.9613125,0.00008721568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90415365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98159593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095846355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019001577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054679535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19282156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242206263","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19611","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Nicky Fortunato <i>[2015] O.J. No. 1502; 2015 ONSC 1845 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, March 20, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Biology; Zoology; Hymenoptera","score_opus":0.06143848215864963,"score_gpt":0.32837721160953137,"score_spread":0.26693872945088176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242206263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063814134,0.023136012,0.0010489454,0.28688836,0.0053268466,0.00016422573,0.0016012767,0.00015417783,0.6752988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037267394,0.0042145,0.00056069694,0.08938087,0.00055535615,0.000074001946,0.0002395396,0.000091494265,0.8676163],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770087,0.00027329611,0.000078297584,0.00030533512,0.0009494037,0.0006928302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974841,0.0009146764,0.00013998446,0.000078762736,0.0008993217,0.0004831848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024254,0.00049023994,0.0004448343,0.00094421906,0.01697766,0.007172782,0.0013912454,0.0067800377,0.06631565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085936515,0.00061223796,0.0004859683,0.000887967,0.0038097766,0.0028103509,0.002544,0.007453539,0.011066721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036671016,0.000013168295,0.0010235682,0.000088878485,0.000008460298,0.00019852693,0.0013988018,0.00003179447,0.00014239753,0.058337662,0.9288902,0.009829813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001011835,0.000011515254,0.003340188,0.00030959447,0.000012261572,0.000088588706,0.0020983722,0.000053409145,0.00022425356,0.004272693,0.98955286,0.000026203636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6907179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90024835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6907179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014673517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026672307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62220705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242221348","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17910","title":"Ontario First Nations Limited Partnership v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>Case No. CV-12-461369, [2013] O.J. No. 2800; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 2992; 2013 ONSC 4166 (Ontario Court of Justice, June 17, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; General partnership; Download; Law; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.03532596529928986,"score_gpt":0.2548350094174521,"score_spread":0.21950904411816222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242221348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009224055,0.0036076664,0.00054272806,0.023663323,0.00038666112,0.00021193444,0.0046972,0.00009894593,0.9575676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11758973,0.0031289365,0.0010176253,0.025485959,0.0001435549,0.000216223,0.0018107236,0.00007394318,0.85053325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973109,0.00013879657,0.000059790465,0.00013678789,0.0015721886,0.0007816213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979462,0.000332675,0.00010517676,0.000057538753,0.0012016612,0.0003567292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012720635,0.0005037236,0.00023530897,0.0014266369,0.015040136,0.004071752,0.0013293112,0.003780618,0.037222568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003722775,0.0007182485,0.00049694814,0.0019270722,0.002083285,0.0014048195,0.0010626541,0.0020059575,0.0043001412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042921718,0.000021598456,0.004410098,0.000117853924,0.000010897778,0.00028785173,0.0017436902,0.00010576706,0.0003835804,0.08025972,0.9032307,0.009385384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035616962,0.000020732597,0.022614263,0.00018233876,0.000029561734,0.00012009245,0.0015074242,0.00029131817,0.00053805026,0.0039862185,0.9706251,0.000049298673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9794805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044444088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044444088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07402895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3224659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242254569","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18111","title":"Michigan vs. The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians <i>Case No. 13-1438, 2013 WL 6645395 (U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, December 18, 2013)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribe; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01944810771552718,"score_gpt":0.2532683744881838,"score_spread":0.2338202667726566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242254569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072298676,0.0043533803,0.00041967985,0.07864242,0.0007163902,0.00009271852,0.0013617404,0.000110938534,0.842004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41309765,0.0023110963,0.00043061722,0.07899239,0.00061123166,0.0003111206,0.0004665841,0.00006996199,0.5037094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922,0.000110770015,0.000014852473,0.00009200084,0.00018144197,0.0003809581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992274,0.0003024287,0.00005334113,0.000028332179,0.00018908367,0.00019944666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082966516,0.0003674834,0.00025404035,0.0007452818,0.015601002,0.004377897,0.0013244698,0.0053025614,0.029006323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002319239,0.00044528762,0.0003151883,0.0008390813,0.0018333372,0.0011477049,0.0015283936,0.0040303855,0.0028934896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012731776,0.0000628127,0.007975134,0.00011141777,0.00003278799,0.0013895523,0.0044141817,0.00009829387,0.00081193977,0.15678087,0.8114403,0.016755493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000633707,0.00007920741,0.054456886,0.000507324,0.00009792888,0.00053621747,0.010411355,0.00061661,0.0020032616,0.008054469,0.9230943,0.00007921467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34962255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7261503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34962255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046780067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005213199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69517505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242279659","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161112","title":"<i>R. v. Trins</i> <i>Case No. A10-7330-30Z; [2012] A.J. No. 600; 2012 ABPC 156; 2012 AB.C. LEXIS 1108 (Alberta Provincial Court, June 11, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01901146512330852,"score_gpt":0.26681222964717793,"score_spread":0.2478007645238694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242279659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032864998,0.0024910027,0.0005518094,0.034115806,0.00091170287,0.0001701461,0.0028172971,0.00037455466,0.9552812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05461008,0.0014928364,0.0009958799,0.10233178,0.00040665365,0.00021058963,0.0016363288,0.00017417931,0.8381417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976042,0.00020415892,0.0000812897,0.0002292572,0.0010507432,0.0008304306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976482,0.0006743247,0.00013798077,0.00010118415,0.0011736464,0.0002647898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017262807,0.0007656457,0.0005285048,0.0017818443,0.010723441,0.005757172,0.002517992,0.009683902,0.056586772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060086055,0.00091461197,0.00074296584,0.0015775589,0.0020002879,0.0015928214,0.0014970275,0.0058276462,0.01873475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023053135,0.000019313746,0.00070175197,0.00004595616,0.0000057912343,0.00017303329,0.00035573775,0.000070341724,0.00020331684,0.058568183,0.93534106,0.0044925213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031994387,0.000032173255,0.008262801,0.00030014428,0.000027286193,0.00021014003,0.0009417208,0.0003760257,0.0006463004,0.010447102,0.9786709,0.000053354477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6201146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83715594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6201146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011114836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019270191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76424515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243184977","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20513","title":"R. v. Dey <i>No.: 500-73-004217-143; [2016] Q.J. No. 2333; 2016 QCCQ 1670 (Court of Québec [Criminal and Penal Division] District of Montréal, March 21, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Law; Criminal court; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Arithmetic; International law","score_opus":0.03771702997297455,"score_gpt":0.3294438888148218,"score_spread":0.29172685884184724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243184977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020768116,0.0024102398,0.00073767686,0.024859846,0.0007908768,0.00024750776,0.007565771,0.0006207367,0.96069056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01770578,0.0008011347,0.00041646653,0.03914085,0.00016212127,0.0001959964,0.0012515617,0.00017058598,0.9401555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716175,0.00019528875,0.00008407503,0.00030285388,0.0011895333,0.0010665995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99524164,0.0010068426,0.00018739818,0.00018291366,0.002880251,0.0005009457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026183084,0.0009707684,0.0006820864,0.0017072667,0.010849978,0.006890705,0.0025462117,0.010080794,0.17311123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008221909,0.0010459188,0.000718333,0.0015604976,0.0022540372,0.002159741,0.0016317904,0.006115415,0.07253059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026254467,0.000016849666,0.0006286852,0.00004993629,0.000006239391,0.00010141667,0.00017443247,0.000051687144,0.00017064446,0.02254855,0.9718534,0.004371907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000342876,0.000020124795,0.005098235,0.00022133908,0.000020554215,0.000105898675,0.00033942735,0.00021890941,0.00034046383,0.002037017,0.9915187,0.00004501732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85312897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9279358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85312897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018926393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034020714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5791148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243198121","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14412","title":"Dennis v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp., <i>[2010] O.J. No. 1223 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Law and economics; Political science; Advertising; Economics; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02510372144971111,"score_gpt":0.2576572364137912,"score_spread":0.23255351496408005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243198121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009296981,0.00607735,0.00047428234,0.030797528,0.00056499516,0.00015057783,0.0047071646,0.00016842475,0.9477627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.068334505,0.0033789664,0.000560185,0.03132461,0.00016945048,0.00012152712,0.001409777,0.000058172544,0.8946428],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998519,0.00006468699,0.00003739621,0.00009285692,0.0008265757,0.00045949608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884284,0.00021303094,0.000069196256,0.000031379124,0.0006419519,0.00020163516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082004967,0.0005631292,0.00027723156,0.0012879279,0.012843279,0.0049409666,0.0013707712,0.00578378,0.040468436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002766246,0.00083974237,0.00049588067,0.0014946109,0.0017815747,0.0013669775,0.0008916541,0.002409079,0.006217234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037830523,0.00002540759,0.003492844,0.00007537516,0.000008288703,0.00017820393,0.00085875456,0.000071725524,0.00030241124,0.04952132,0.9381756,0.00725231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036169447,0.00001723754,0.018191418,0.00016673001,0.000027683534,0.00009202236,0.00082247594,0.00026518706,0.00045034834,0.00268983,0.97720224,0.000038653787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94488245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055117548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02403284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035325803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17437124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243222075","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20411","title":"Great Canadian Gaming Corp. v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>Docket No. S152587; [2016] B.C.J. No. 113; 2016 BCSC 101 (British Columbia Supreme Court, Vancouver, British Columbia, January 25, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Lottery; Columbia university; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Media studies","score_opus":0.008839946253133973,"score_gpt":0.19484774699820023,"score_spread":0.18600780074506626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243222075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032686244,0.0073239133,0.0004702498,0.044679422,0.0011342325,0.0001338855,0.0034449701,0.00018335407,0.9393614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07442186,0.0068671172,0.0010556554,0.1114088,0.00043207363,0.00021542764,0.0018448422,0.00012814856,0.80362606],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968256,0.00020900623,0.0000797477,0.0001841347,0.0017347878,0.0009667835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742943,0.00069570984,0.0000738896,0.000064307795,0.0014425722,0.00029415888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015627266,0.0008469486,0.0003814024,0.0021930044,0.015518597,0.0064717745,0.0022718972,0.00842668,0.045068387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005460598,0.0007656212,0.0006660488,0.002634023,0.0026834768,0.0015878751,0.0010936075,0.0057785395,0.0073211184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001570767,0.000009323827,0.00055184215,0.000073051946,0.0000060469993,0.00010848375,0.00042827622,0.00007967403,0.00013695857,0.03924459,0.95314616,0.0061998027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002258216,0.000012770729,0.005563124,0.00031460726,0.000028266735,0.00008381884,0.0010088456,0.0002015963,0.00034021988,0.00416563,0.98820704,0.000051417523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97028524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045068387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035041872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07166385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25424773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243943677","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19412","title":"Walsh v. Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. <i>[2015] N.S.J. No. 56; 2015 NSCA 16 (Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, February 13, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Appeal; Lottery; Law; Political science; History; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02910424056185277,"score_gpt":0.27524024276563464,"score_spread":0.24613600220378187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243943677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0089080855,0.0054589873,0.000600385,0.1388563,0.0021361152,0.00014396102,0.001111543,0.00016658746,0.84261805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10304958,0.0033518327,0.0008372529,0.36374494,0.0011456928,0.00027477948,0.0004808725,0.00008064981,0.52703434],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812895,0.00029133272,0.000085852924,0.00020597718,0.0006981448,0.000589768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771464,0.0012789734,0.00011065906,0.00006111645,0.0005822706,0.00025230803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016421457,0.0006731748,0.00038284445,0.0010710679,0.0102139795,0.005337598,0.0018188546,0.0122794965,0.026737439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007614177,0.0007354968,0.0007326416,0.00070575956,0.0021085588,0.0018143342,0.0015694384,0.007916933,0.007913226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035378376,0.000020453339,0.0008536542,0.0000947207,0.000008465309,0.0003845683,0.0011948883,0.00006846553,0.00037472876,0.08024341,0.91015697,0.0065642535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047769634,0.00004157738,0.0054675005,0.0006200378,0.00003495821,0.00025515785,0.0018083657,0.00031381962,0.0006890738,0.008872344,0.9817861,0.00006331829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26488343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5462924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7351166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066728718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010099841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5266833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244012758","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19215","title":"R. v. Miller <i>[2014] B.C.J. No. 2121, 2014 BCSC 1561, Docket: X075613 (British Columbia Supreme Court, April 4, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Miller; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02322293283140335,"score_gpt":0.2536600518538323,"score_spread":0.23043711902242892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244012758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003321991,0.004075615,0.00061599864,0.05671635,0.0006880237,0.0002298456,0.0042531556,0.00050633494,0.92959255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0328846,0.0023545085,0.00118402,0.080353074,0.00037356353,0.00036946198,0.0012445232,0.00015180855,0.8810844],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976508,0.00017323587,0.00008184597,0.00021881155,0.0011598865,0.0007154316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800044,0.00058293616,0.00010637668,0.000094027615,0.0010021008,0.00021416809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016253979,0.00073787005,0.00055840734,0.002007586,0.011986049,0.005640419,0.0021875885,0.009252793,0.08305398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070273834,0.0009328418,0.0007551353,0.0019152345,0.0020330853,0.0019190129,0.001436458,0.0069183884,0.027160795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020189158,0.000017836624,0.00047567784,0.0000540073,0.000005139584,0.00008816681,0.00016962586,0.000052575462,0.00021937425,0.0485029,0.9426178,0.0077767037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035884645,0.00001894719,0.005962268,0.00036672948,0.000029320216,0.00009517887,0.00034791967,0.00028923395,0.00046838896,0.008846976,0.9834902,0.000048916474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6184404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8486769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3815596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013113913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02973045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76761335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245174989","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18910","title":"In the Matter of the Bankruptcy of Phu Hai Pham[2014) B.C.J. No. 2013, 2014 BCSC 1538, 2014 BC.C. Lexis 1750 (British Columbia Supreme Court (in Bankruptcy &amp; Involvency), July 30, 2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Supreme court; Lexis; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013551845811978859,"score_gpt":0.20254489788669885,"score_spread":0.18899305207472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245174989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015463946,0.01945805,0.0013452477,0.13403372,0.009214951,0.00021240035,0.0021930197,0.00017313108,0.81790555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16300632,0.006791515,0.00079836533,0.1550268,0.003065948,0.00027127998,0.0005309926,0.000100383506,0.6704085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861777,0.00025446079,0.00009096281,0.0002077932,0.00042336038,0.00040574512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989832,0.00044972848,0.00009496729,0.000056735094,0.0003112109,0.00010426229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001669534,0.00057053834,0.00032797115,0.0005383647,0.009438536,0.0068952483,0.0009689227,0.013475153,0.018636124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058684535,0.0006138497,0.0003999679,0.0007950288,0.002174037,0.0024458915,0.0015501367,0.0072977087,0.0040079914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032030923,0.000024418694,0.0011750682,0.000082657025,0.000011818586,0.00048377315,0.0014427461,0.00010266781,0.00026173098,0.23193292,0.7505467,0.013903539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001539416,0.000023053131,0.0077693034,0.0003652255,0.00002026821,0.00018459652,0.0014272623,0.0002634306,0.00040299943,0.01461031,0.9748683,0.00004990453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1725114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43573695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8274886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053352737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007437051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34301454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246162766","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19113","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Joseph LeClair <i>[2014] O.J. No. 2700, 2014 ON.C. LEXIS 2994 (Ontario Court of Justice, March 19, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Economic Justice; Lexis; Humanities; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0374808489849111,"score_gpt":0.2876950274305874,"score_spread":0.2502141784456763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246162766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004020817,0.018778281,0.00096966024,0.12788428,0.0035216515,0.00009378199,0.00088145887,0.00020099367,0.8436491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022319471,0.0023784102,0.00028358464,0.031167269,0.00028444405,0.00004163869,0.00011835317,0.000075587996,0.94333124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861896,0.00015683188,0.00003982852,0.00018124274,0.0005392259,0.0004638027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889946,0.00033802656,0.00006755488,0.000039597893,0.00044107603,0.00021428641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011847189,0.00048610524,0.00034611073,0.0008488412,0.014897068,0.007011444,0.0012015713,0.0050683306,0.08437743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004922291,0.00062373123,0.00043790697,0.0008479163,0.0029794772,0.0027606585,0.0024636972,0.0059407847,0.017629072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021575303,0.0000109666125,0.0005811532,0.000048518792,0.000004256637,0.0001401193,0.0011216961,0.000026658894,0.00014309713,0.07078587,0.9164824,0.010633732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000524718,0.0000069669672,0.001616505,0.00014822076,0.0000043795985,0.00006399284,0.0014530824,0.00004254841,0.00018491196,0.0036250527,0.9928323,0.000016832324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60829437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8243635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39170563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012297531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01569081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7880249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246623397","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19212","title":"CHC Casinos Canada Ltd. v. Luo <i>[2015] O.J. No. 1, 2015 ONSC 3, Court File No.: CV-13-482139 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 2, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Federal court; Court decision; Supreme court","score_opus":0.020798847694689666,"score_gpt":0.26440094153032484,"score_spread":0.24360209383563516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246623397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078061232,0.0018628228,0.0005168466,0.016813954,0.00029719374,0.00017990675,0.0028487667,0.00018785398,0.9694865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09167032,0.0019692043,0.0007416541,0.029875929,0.00012774502,0.00020769538,0.0013790865,0.00008781763,0.8739406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790925,0.00011859259,0.00005135439,0.00015074387,0.0010516782,0.00071826915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797446,0.0004756238,0.00009213316,0.000058474725,0.0011452032,0.0002541594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010857618,0.0005101317,0.0002537956,0.0016864609,0.011896735,0.004856143,0.001710949,0.0045787715,0.047949288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045532943,0.0006563638,0.00043396957,0.0018371319,0.0017655435,0.0014637581,0.0010741052,0.0028300795,0.006552397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037235073,0.00002089316,0.0021553556,0.00014590209,0.000009510437,0.0002625787,0.0011746634,0.00010323063,0.00034041866,0.10071661,0.8850812,0.00995251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029806699,0.000020474265,0.00826259,0.00022000448,0.000028449565,0.00010271722,0.0013670118,0.00028970442,0.00058921304,0.0029513561,0.98609483,0.00004385469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9403348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059665203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024640974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043230575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17878366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246921850","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19612","title":"Between Stanley Howard Tomchin, Plaintiff, and Her Majesty the Queen and the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Defendants <i>[2015] F.C.J. No. 378; 2015 FC 402 (Federal Court, Vancouver, British Columbia, March 30, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Plaintiff; Law; Queen (butterfly); Preparedness; Political science; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.028192252856117938,"score_gpt":0.27961806071089784,"score_spread":0.2514258078547799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246921850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019290667,0.014031084,0.0017930162,0.32365385,0.005521662,0.00023563988,0.00071655767,0.00012229296,0.63463527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10225358,0.0035176042,0.00096819585,0.26764637,0.0008816558,0.00017446624,0.00020200142,0.0000713071,0.62428474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970373,0.0005241662,0.000111179375,0.00042505495,0.0011194429,0.00078296335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99626416,0.0023395733,0.0001486792,0.000094298106,0.0007187926,0.00043457167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028079774,0.00047828292,0.00045613822,0.0010414416,0.019703528,0.0070889704,0.0017275276,0.012869501,0.020950666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012827408,0.00087532046,0.0005549052,0.0012631972,0.0034724658,0.002506076,0.002475783,0.0088828085,0.003738442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003235105,0.000030971143,0.0011651332,0.000076757395,0.000011555359,0.0005541996,0.0025515219,0.00007710758,0.00027158775,0.21307129,0.77529365,0.0068638967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029351771,0.000027456299,0.0044962717,0.00036531012,0.000026345106,0.00037527617,0.005503442,0.00024858947,0.00065876683,0.018587444,0.9696286,0.000053191783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3167207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57397807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6832793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007990753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01813539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6297543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247510543","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.15911","title":"Haghdust v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>Docket No. S105520, 2011 BCSC 772 (British Columbia Supreme Court, June 2, 2011)</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Lottery; Political science; Electronic signature; Economics","score_opus":0.028209927362558118,"score_gpt":0.22776491453807696,"score_spread":0.19955498717551884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247510543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006882601,0.0029304535,0.000549163,0.02061696,0.0005716887,0.00015711322,0.0050058137,0.00026085577,0.9630253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03798614,0.0011593839,0.00048280988,0.019396134,0.00006242524,0.00013365045,0.0014517924,0.00007521804,0.93925244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997758,0.00014995756,0.000062148065,0.00015164333,0.0011364165,0.0007418628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817467,0.0003977674,0.00006110231,0.00007654247,0.0010670162,0.00022283108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011898335,0.00061070116,0.00038524612,0.0017188739,0.014383519,0.006159638,0.0019062924,0.0067377896,0.07322314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003974066,0.00087728887,0.0005350319,0.0018434032,0.0016431733,0.0015354698,0.0012077638,0.004173392,0.014906832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041809915,0.00002854881,0.0014175145,0.00006113457,0.000008486549,0.00012619136,0.00031129055,0.00010901357,0.00023303114,0.038212042,0.9503312,0.009119771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049249644,0.00002514416,0.012037184,0.00028810868,0.000036725796,0.000108445616,0.0010944225,0.0005378212,0.0007546201,0.0051714294,0.9798275,0.00006930049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9139782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9803798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08602178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022017078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044062894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24495584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247762789","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14615","title":"203102 Ontario Ltd. v. Canada <i>[2010] O.J. No. 2055 (May 14, 2010)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.015208141255021458,"score_gpt":0.23464852136471784,"score_spread":0.21944038010969638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247762789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00813795,0.0035718442,0.0007121217,0.028073952,0.00086207833,0.00024709324,0.0057182238,0.00021249578,0.95246416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05358426,0.0017894441,0.00083269307,0.04945879,0.00015011664,0.00014233484,0.0014654294,0.00006702973,0.8925098],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774784,0.00010426293,0.000055988214,0.00014614155,0.0012119212,0.0007338812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979949,0.00028466497,0.00007899472,0.000061236904,0.0013362474,0.00024390356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010809762,0.00069448416,0.00038004736,0.0016022315,0.014961633,0.0058843396,0.0017827274,0.008401779,0.034988306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029015034,0.0008692336,0.00080931385,0.0017434908,0.0023011642,0.0013123782,0.0008936581,0.003365827,0.006815183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043214215,0.000034998375,0.002757828,0.00011460892,0.000016411841,0.0003104904,0.001209075,0.00014862079,0.0006540235,0.067155495,0.91845465,0.0091006085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029066843,0.000026996478,0.0126998415,0.00019490831,0.000042973006,0.00012190771,0.0013449449,0.00028726985,0.0007076843,0.0026005378,0.9818813,0.00006263003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98252213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034988306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03342049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06888415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24248374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247898333","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161113","title":"<i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp.</i> <i>Case No. CV-08-352327, CV-08-356748, [2012] O.J. No. 1879, 2012 ON.C. LEXIS 3717; 2012 ONSC 2304 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, April 30, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Humanities; Art; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Statistics; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03858182301488459,"score_gpt":0.2729170242922233,"score_spread":0.23433520127733873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247898333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044537135,0.0035024555,0.00041533608,0.024937237,0.0006013672,0.0002072754,0.0052373125,0.00016239345,0.9604829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058551624,0.0027628485,0.00081545586,0.047268685,0.0003202038,0.00025309584,0.0024277722,0.00011382581,0.88748646],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974704,0.00012789265,0.00008006403,0.00018430302,0.0013963782,0.0007410353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797744,0.00042030882,0.00013691925,0.0000873578,0.0011303123,0.00024766597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011624559,0.000649458,0.0003732083,0.0016007614,0.011922816,0.0048302785,0.002255026,0.0059531657,0.054230843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00402045,0.0009492981,0.0007467894,0.0019763676,0.00193885,0.0016628935,0.0012406991,0.0032377462,0.009622389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025173866,0.000016417496,0.0012029456,0.00007161621,0.0000079711335,0.0001483676,0.0006517345,0.000042549687,0.00021790144,0.03342067,0.95903313,0.005161513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022300192,0.0000149220505,0.013246815,0.00014912113,0.000021160467,0.000084634514,0.0006302596,0.00017223027,0.00032894008,0.0021409993,0.98315513,0.00003349696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92143947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98215276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07856053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024962736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030563336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1814202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248601765","doi":"10.1089/glre.2009.13210","title":"1397868 Ontario Ltd. v. Nordic Gaming Corp., <i>[2008] O.J. No. 5171</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.01967238829424454,"score_gpt":0.2614517018495865,"score_spread":0.24177931355534196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248601765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063960217,0.0042978143,0.00052229024,0.010310879,0.0006925051,0.00013314204,0.002787,0.00015050726,0.9747098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035521455,0.0018623639,0.00041256272,0.015553926,0.000112940244,0.000108619686,0.00094628887,0.000054321987,0.9454276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791974,0.00010948803,0.00007054774,0.00018559664,0.0011173115,0.0005973573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984225,0.00034600424,0.00008172077,0.000050006478,0.0009208004,0.00017903911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011437383,0.0007153193,0.00035185597,0.0014299673,0.011262738,0.00533802,0.0015964007,0.009170588,0.04688402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034973393,0.0010838835,0.0006595172,0.0014733796,0.0017506243,0.0018404373,0.0011625533,0.0032863924,0.010176294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007029527,0.00003880985,0.0030237585,0.00016024912,0.000013661894,0.00027972847,0.0012925235,0.00015759462,0.0006963746,0.10317314,0.87872875,0.01236515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025757427,0.000024049583,0.008568198,0.0002559536,0.000026553647,0.00009623274,0.000810599,0.00017302873,0.00047125545,0.0026618391,0.98684955,0.000037010523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8578923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9632085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8578923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014913956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026878504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2858892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248841446","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16611","title":"Between Giuseppe Tarascio and Her Majesty, the Queen[2012] F.C.J. No. 127, 2012 FCA 30, 2012 Fed.C.C. LEXIS 134 (Federal Court of Appeal, Toronto, Ontario; January 26, 2012)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Appeal; Lexis; Art; Humanities; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Botany","score_opus":0.02658409602326493,"score_gpt":0.27696495111278485,"score_spread":0.2503808550895199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248841446","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056226477,0.16505699,0.0016193093,0.5171431,0.017788451,0.00010309922,0.0005045281,0.00017699407,0.29198492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08650934,0.031195428,0.0011195956,0.21281551,0.00780667,0.00016393651,0.00016434022,0.00022315381,0.6600021],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990338,0.00027779053,0.000025121222,0.00025735295,0.0002178281,0.00018815798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987348,0.0008031531,0.00007810785,0.00004766198,0.00014128178,0.00019495358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013298463,0.00072833395,0.0004398624,0.00075784087,0.0075063235,0.0041389847,0.00091573066,0.005299549,0.02587189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044726883,0.000528847,0.00030113154,0.00068612763,0.002909019,0.0026424974,0.0023630003,0.007129025,0.0075718467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021320313,0.000009671178,0.00024733823,0.00006185101,0.0000068555837,0.00017706092,0.0012140819,0.00003812144,0.000087183325,0.039486676,0.94987273,0.008777097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009643799,0.000006841641,0.0013536118,0.00016075498,0.000005150152,0.00015207673,0.0008824293,0.000059304548,0.00007313942,0.005102367,0.99217904,0.000015665108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076929666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22180662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9230703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033053649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031043917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15296376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249754693","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20115","title":"Kalra v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>[2015] O.J. No. 4153, 2015 ONSC 4983; Court File No.: CV-14-4450-00 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, August 6, 2015)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Federal court; Library science; Computer science; Supreme court; Economics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.019604268381198654,"score_gpt":0.2578478612331971,"score_spread":0.23824359285199842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249754693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008905198,0.003970978,0.00069639314,0.020513518,0.00037318293,0.00024005487,0.0052200276,0.00017382429,0.959907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11083378,0.003342281,0.00097581354,0.021202803,0.00017178233,0.00021657888,0.0019543695,0.00007482703,0.86122775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765354,0.00012458685,0.00006909013,0.00013519505,0.0013220535,0.0006956163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748504,0.00043830043,0.0001306147,0.00006845088,0.0015319124,0.00034570575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013156559,0.00042254792,0.00029646882,0.0014244729,0.012910357,0.0044124965,0.0014487912,0.0034640573,0.05494036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041525727,0.0007298295,0.0005303083,0.0014693786,0.0017659737,0.0015268604,0.001040845,0.0021493114,0.007510233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056048593,0.000024288547,0.0033018487,0.00015079224,0.0000107955475,0.00020579332,0.0011786327,0.00008418039,0.0003877111,0.07356338,0.90999115,0.011045372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053603017,0.000028377539,0.029540468,0.00027207503,0.000044044136,0.00013445115,0.001187761,0.00040988927,0.0005202207,0.0038292536,0.96392465,0.000055153076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9602725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99254346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05494036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030807775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04582311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22352713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250988032","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.15308","title":"Between Clotilde Bérubé, Appellant, and Rational Entertainment Limited, RespondentINDEXED AS: Bérubé v. Rational Entertainment Ltd.Divisional Court File No. 09-DV-1559Ontario Superior Court of JusticeDivisional Court - Ottawa, Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entertainment; Law; Federal court; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.027157987084553525,"score_gpt":0.2608420082777049,"score_spread":0.23368402119315135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250988032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055564508,0.008107948,0.0005842237,0.05801092,0.0009427615,0.00018250462,0.002412527,0.00002780042,0.8741667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3145534,0.0020610357,0.0002880988,0.021998309,0.0002302736,0.00014201649,0.0005111387,0.000030049223,0.66018564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743384,0.00027045602,0.000089113644,0.00046786887,0.0006279775,0.0011109167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707234,0.0010178955,0.00016325516,0.00009909086,0.0009967114,0.0006506227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016359643,0.0003160061,0.00034633366,0.00096524257,0.014889469,0.004789334,0.0011349887,0.005559655,0.043453623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008271437,0.0005510133,0.0002850183,0.0011589874,0.0019762113,0.0018447741,0.0017292843,0.004723325,0.0033130478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024674818,0.00008577264,0.019752529,0.00013773676,0.000034274733,0.0013157211,0.0075653717,0.00013179383,0.00041106093,0.25348157,0.693995,0.022842411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076884135,0.00003789919,0.05302111,0.00029969448,0.00004002536,0.0003808506,0.008052599,0.00031903287,0.00041316487,0.0073761838,0.92993283,0.000049690618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7735399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9363074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2264601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015814561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020386435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4555875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251263544","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14913","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario (Native Affairs), <i>S.C.C.A. No. 91, C.S.C.R. no 91, File No.: 33613 (Supreme Court of Canada, July 8, 2010)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016435658769321584,"score_gpt":0.2192227205486977,"score_spread":0.2027870617793761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251263544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024629964,0.005338595,0.0008334339,0.06218552,0.0012313343,0.00019634789,0.0036149207,0.00010404842,0.9018659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17187269,0.0042444123,0.0009633677,0.03994244,0.00021723856,0.0001234273,0.0012334016,0.000054502187,0.7813485],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986688,0.00008486785,0.000030055096,0.00011641196,0.0006115003,0.000488506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986589,0.00037790535,0.000045944056,0.000041955278,0.00068393117,0.0001913427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011030744,0.00036645553,0.0003133382,0.0008992121,0.013888802,0.0049269386,0.0011982427,0.005024548,0.018785235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004417596,0.0004303952,0.0003800209,0.0010014757,0.0017650006,0.0012367235,0.0008270355,0.0029592644,0.002070016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006645438,0.00003771478,0.0063941474,0.00015049185,0.000018897166,0.0008871601,0.0037252724,0.00010819805,0.00084215926,0.13138245,0.84384406,0.012543027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021896627,0.000026039193,0.023704028,0.00018415533,0.000051003564,0.00018843256,0.0037416066,0.0003307391,0.0013728864,0.005215028,0.9651108,0.000053289878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9208972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98508334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079102814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020538146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039534543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15913731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252216832","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17415","title":"Majewski v. Complex Services Inc. <i>[2013] O.J. No. 396; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 282; 2013 ONSC 690 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 30, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.024848904152509753,"score_gpt":0.26179457320145105,"score_spread":0.2369456690489413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252216832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008172361,0.0036546604,0.00078643515,0.03880506,0.00053786725,0.0001850231,0.0030653635,0.00017234588,0.94462097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.100131,0.0029829773,0.0012943672,0.06324959,0.0002829429,0.00031271664,0.0013766102,0.00011716008,0.8302526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986628,0.00010214389,0.00006917217,0.00013456299,0.0006666433,0.00036463395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989838,0.00034397715,0.00008770949,0.000036449535,0.00039762657,0.00015030397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010281305,0.0005220845,0.0002562064,0.0012458629,0.008721083,0.00472937,0.0012318264,0.0044681616,0.043879073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043488685,0.00080546434,0.0005497812,0.0010209841,0.0014484208,0.0018854807,0.0013039707,0.003783372,0.008717456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051419895,0.000021854976,0.001471971,0.00011098428,0.000008130565,0.00018176605,0.00073175126,0.00007187448,0.00042507797,0.1714076,0.81550485,0.010012805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041664618,0.000022093625,0.008432626,0.00026920423,0.000028029688,0.00016362761,0.0005613508,0.00041607342,0.00060555304,0.008407572,0.981012,0.000040298248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52939326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83069277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47060674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009742303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01726714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9467565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253012223","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16412","title":"Bell v. Levy <i>[2011] B.C.J. No. 2018, 2011 BCCA 417; 2011 BC.C. LEXIS 5195 (British Columbia Court of Appeal, October 27, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Lexis; Download; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02812046852513575,"score_gpt":0.2573231408813508,"score_spread":0.22920267235621503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253012223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005373371,0.005181789,0.00073808036,0.065098636,0.0011735843,0.00011157947,0.0017667355,0.00030393945,0.9202522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.063425794,0.0020876597,0.0007144976,0.13515261,0.00035554325,0.00026870312,0.0008160814,0.0001609152,0.79701823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724555,0.00023447775,0.00007773075,0.0002480332,0.0011595148,0.00103466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759513,0.0008390871,0.000113613074,0.00007523408,0.0011130999,0.00026385693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018924203,0.0007504831,0.0004652308,0.0014486754,0.014446304,0.0069602644,0.0021913762,0.013283009,0.045745905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074777026,0.0009067648,0.00074213505,0.0019521511,0.002219736,0.0026802437,0.0020117625,0.0071850717,0.015624952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025565105,0.000023234776,0.00056673086,0.000048733426,0.000005781531,0.00009914615,0.00040177978,0.000049939037,0.00020982436,0.09502512,0.89663404,0.006910074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032850498,0.000024650693,0.004959771,0.00029841522,0.00003137293,0.00009424098,0.0006452805,0.00028742658,0.0004916419,0.009539089,0.9835382,0.00005697723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5704208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76265746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4295792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014021704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022788106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8642181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253019488","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20412","title":"MGM Grand Hotel LLC v. Chiu <i>CV-15-527306; [2016] O.J. No. 721; 2016 ONSC 1071 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, February 10, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Download; Advertising; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.017568862641268588,"score_gpt":0.2517096826205425,"score_spread":0.2341408199792739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253019488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006211005,0.0014011032,0.0004383959,0.016913617,0.00042449997,0.00018291346,0.0027277102,0.0002694329,0.9714314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059763584,0.0009888626,0.0006046638,0.0350071,0.00019339132,0.0002794127,0.0010607531,0.00012570346,0.9019765],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976941,0.00018551397,0.000060829225,0.00018324585,0.0011409576,0.0007354173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983524,0.000426282,0.00009654534,0.00007518579,0.00077170413,0.0002778943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012690314,0.0006454164,0.0003119302,0.0015126963,0.011866616,0.005328052,0.0017861556,0.006889922,0.08019911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004863063,0.00073388894,0.0005546794,0.0016287434,0.0018730904,0.0017825434,0.0014691708,0.0038907586,0.01887797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004174587,0.000026878717,0.0017008866,0.00008698321,0.000007572718,0.00025545974,0.0009275356,0.00005179398,0.00038464827,0.08209924,0.9073067,0.007110598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002995139,0.000026608519,0.006810251,0.00018689634,0.000019831203,0.0001174407,0.00084903644,0.0002477845,0.00062533846,0.0030235613,0.98803,0.000033206423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72459424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91940993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27540576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013505378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020667216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55405533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253535235","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18712","title":"Souliere v. Casino Niagara2014 CarswellOnt 3908, 2014 OnSC 1915, 239 A.C.W.S. (3d) 266 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, March 25, 2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.024040022461297772,"score_gpt":0.2767443486285625,"score_spread":0.25270432616726474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253535235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0104926415,0.0049871774,0.00044088924,0.031650785,0.0007504837,0.00013215607,0.0017477939,0.00012222228,0.9496758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07562833,0.0025008575,0.0007317814,0.03143654,0.00019233317,0.00019967697,0.0007857085,0.00007289792,0.88845176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985055,0.00009682442,0.000037373455,0.00018756716,0.0007152951,0.00045755666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888617,0.00027783585,0.00004891473,0.000049243165,0.00056168454,0.0001761672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010853688,0.0005276104,0.0002836039,0.00088444917,0.016794251,0.004508288,0.0013474919,0.0056186696,0.038051024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043876283,0.00057951943,0.00039072733,0.00080882706,0.0014375686,0.0015159884,0.0012922894,0.004493996,0.006454142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072984694,0.000039306335,0.0030303854,0.00009862613,0.000010093354,0.0003866572,0.0017342676,0.000091057285,0.0005155845,0.09723828,0.88264185,0.01414088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018858562,0.00001618689,0.0077207326,0.00015477763,0.000021162929,0.00011977342,0.0008819019,0.00018595347,0.0006176306,0.0025817945,0.9876472,0.000034151442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8073767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9627127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8073767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016864652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023138825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38751537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253588455","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20311","title":"Lalani v. Reeves <i>Case File No. 07-CV-338183CP; [2016] O.J. No. 397; 2016 ONSC 424 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 26, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01707181484242867,"score_gpt":0.25230569093579847,"score_spread":0.2352338760933698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253588455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027986865,0.0017428899,0.00045546805,0.023556191,0.00040627437,0.00018099307,0.005248215,0.00023565683,0.9653757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06614634,0.002910529,0.001155042,0.07690497,0.0005255514,0.00046597343,0.0038617256,0.00026218628,0.8477676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959622,0.00037870996,0.00014971478,0.00037524142,0.0018520015,0.0012821249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954514,0.0018225241,0.00023102835,0.00020174513,0.0019024246,0.00039086497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033134113,0.00064334465,0.00060977146,0.0023687175,0.009774059,0.0067248014,0.0030996762,0.008750908,0.094121344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010748159,0.0008828234,0.0008381975,0.0021877706,0.0018279266,0.0021512266,0.0016786715,0.005336689,0.027102817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000359032,0.000022386588,0.0011026165,0.00007516614,0.000009293467,0.00017045841,0.000497609,0.000039646584,0.00016580238,0.06862741,0.92475706,0.004496713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003795349,0.000020549565,0.005955491,0.0002875861,0.000029231736,0.00014641663,0.000534743,0.00021704825,0.00046866148,0.005265468,0.9869986,0.000038260252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66179985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83778083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33820015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013838078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020255553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68038374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253904827","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161114","title":"<i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp.</i> <i>Case No. CV-08-352327, CV-08-356748, [2012] O.J. No. 2359, 2012 ON.C. Lexis 4239; 2012 ONSC 2903 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, May 29, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Humanities; Political science; Art; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Statistics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04049825371803708,"score_gpt":0.2792281938176612,"score_spread":0.2387299400996241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253904827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004389915,0.0034715794,0.0004302562,0.023899885,0.00058341824,0.00020964435,0.005253381,0.00016069852,0.9616012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05884213,0.0028372079,0.00085270026,0.045513414,0.00031513962,0.0002546432,0.0024662244,0.00011228525,0.8888063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974673,0.00012806046,0.000081527905,0.00018516959,0.0014129799,0.0007249212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980013,0.0004135294,0.00013413648,0.0000862145,0.0011250466,0.00023995363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001159629,0.0006490014,0.00036968407,0.0016002175,0.0117629,0.0047397665,0.0022407454,0.005745423,0.054450396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039478396,0.0009322229,0.0007455525,0.0019842668,0.0019119933,0.0016378266,0.0012268831,0.003138071,0.009573888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025824116,0.000016762331,0.0012324074,0.00007415987,0.000008087387,0.00015266534,0.0006626921,0.00004454558,0.00022961579,0.034580052,0.95754826,0.005424802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002244423,0.000014925494,0.013265398,0.00015178483,0.000021437727,0.0000865258,0.0006258116,0.0001790483,0.00033511323,0.0022177862,0.98304635,0.000033421846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9224749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98243594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07752508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025145939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031034652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18244743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254099115","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17611","title":"Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba, Ltd.Case No. CI 09-01-61504 and CI 09-01-61489, [2013] M.J. No. 81; 2013 MBQB 67; 2013 MB.C.Lexis 81 (Manitoba Court of Queen s Bench, Winnipeg Centre, March 15, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); General partnership; Charter; Library science; Political science; Geography; Humanities; Art; Archaeology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02751448436436627,"score_gpt":0.2525301976058204,"score_spread":0.22501571324145414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254099115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024177646,0.007923131,0.0011553693,0.06300332,0.0008050569,0.00034518653,0.004099237,0.0002629089,0.8982281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09288446,0.0028551174,0.00084290776,0.038571462,0.00008970357,0.0002143369,0.0008221091,0.000052895888,0.8636671],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984433,0.00014070184,0.000037039586,0.0001490283,0.0006656468,0.00056430843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980775,0.00037145684,0.00009980944,0.000051779025,0.001093594,0.00030587538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014611607,0.0006668971,0.00025403406,0.0016060637,0.014505815,0.005484297,0.0016839129,0.0046909857,0.036119692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036353185,0.0011232381,0.00042249862,0.0020602087,0.0020082635,0.0019154797,0.001286972,0.0035992963,0.005849797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009788759,0.000074340795,0.009209489,0.00020757792,0.000031998043,0.00077200576,0.0021179188,0.00022189111,0.000999649,0.12508838,0.8420689,0.019110069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083566716,0.000060423437,0.022919385,0.00040219352,0.000074038966,0.0002573275,0.003636572,0.0006178691,0.0013593199,0.004976443,0.96552706,0.00008589998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9266575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98678374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0733425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02474609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06036525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1795463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254174589","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14712","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 2360 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Political science; Volume (thermodynamics); Humanities; Library science; Media studies; Law; Art; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.03524059886939603,"score_gpt":0.25720224268264835,"score_spread":0.2219616438132523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254174589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033225913,0.0059893187,0.0007100005,0.077656314,0.0011714573,0.00020614247,0.0028770766,0.00011173034,0.87805206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15329374,0.0037499866,0.0006038879,0.054804318,0.00019734833,0.00014223525,0.0007260715,0.000058181322,0.7864243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875677,0.000071434704,0.000029427418,0.000099946454,0.0005391424,0.00050332875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987914,0.0002820918,0.00005446557,0.000038783204,0.00059902045,0.00023428645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010164052,0.00041787646,0.00027325103,0.000719473,0.017765531,0.005000726,0.0013085123,0.0068777655,0.018014101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034639386,0.0005594245,0.00041026302,0.0009421949,0.0021661527,0.0014528228,0.000972185,0.0034813061,0.0018117583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006795938,0.00003669873,0.008286007,0.00014737691,0.000019931833,0.0007875754,0.004944657,0.0001286921,0.0008331589,0.10481059,0.86953557,0.0104017425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024930772,0.00002583069,0.029431997,0.0002266048,0.000058904112,0.00014388666,0.004898108,0.00025574947,0.00096814305,0.0038308643,0.96007377,0.00006119278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9594901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99316084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04050988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02740736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0500266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19885528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256483765","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.171012","title":"Marina District Development Co. (c.o.b. Borgata Hotel Casino &amp; Spa) v. Canada <i>Case No. [2013] F.C.J. No. 847; 2103 Fed.C.C. LEXIS 858; 2013 F.C. 800; (Federal Court, Toronto, Ontario, July 18, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Download; Advertising; Business; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02357041584856334,"score_gpt":0.252725631977032,"score_spread":0.22915521612846868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256483765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004190296,0.00326408,0.0004666645,0.01215089,0.00043695318,0.00010763418,0.0022580153,0.00016003147,0.9769654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040263366,0.0021630093,0.00062844204,0.007818507,0.00008367935,0.000083703606,0.0008562401,0.000065331515,0.9480378],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991122,0.000049249844,0.000021275971,0.000105521416,0.0004502352,0.00026146809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909735,0.0001447639,0.000046419103,0.00003095038,0.0005608627,0.000119641176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058271695,0.0004228766,0.00022537401,0.0013054749,0.008703095,0.003958743,0.0010559955,0.0022754245,0.07315166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017052103,0.0005997787,0.00034684318,0.0012652273,0.0009607335,0.0010113809,0.00086298963,0.002212423,0.013016852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022599002,0.000029843432,0.001732411,0.00007621143,0.0000062663908,0.00013318422,0.00028399468,0.00006565045,0.00031466212,0.058595058,0.9245159,0.0142242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014682819,0.000012477437,0.005972923,0.000098544995,0.000011383144,0.00006804284,0.00041112627,0.00019123752,0.00039445545,0.0017106639,0.99109757,0.000016892955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.793688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9467469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.206312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010753764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018799191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41505402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256694958","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.181010","title":"Szecsodi v. MGM Resorts International <i>Court File No. CV-11-9457-00CL, [2014) O.J. No. 946, 2014 ONSC 1323, 2014 CarswellOnt 2465 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Commercial List, March 3, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01533223290551432,"score_gpt":0.26300772418413465,"score_spread":0.24767549127862032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256694958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016071752,0.0044316263,0.0007589967,0.030198192,0.0007388481,0.0000906743,0.003889969,0.00016725468,0.9436527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25346634,0.0039943415,0.00097128574,0.03386708,0.00038277337,0.00015584212,0.0027005824,0.00013315932,0.7043286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855584,0.000085998334,0.00006064927,0.00011129584,0.00051625504,0.0006699713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994861,0.00014857484,0.000045199344,0.000030644016,0.00020637314,0.000083167615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011316269,0.0004184118,0.00038176146,0.0014420315,0.004711817,0.0048756488,0.0010062174,0.0042009354,0.07018003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027382022,0.00036622194,0.0005124633,0.0012625596,0.001424275,0.001618421,0.0016740622,0.0028734228,0.009929342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014876302,0.00003331225,0.0017342984,0.00016302546,0.000017114608,0.00072632835,0.00072599907,0.00014082532,0.0004894429,0.33143607,0.6478778,0.016507061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007675487,0.000032184278,0.011025544,0.0002531038,0.000040225015,0.00039756627,0.00095440797,0.00045806402,0.0012160069,0.02192602,0.9635816,0.00003838129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14131856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26644832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14131856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055584977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076438445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28099197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256695152","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18812","title":"Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba Ltd. <i>[2014] M.J. No. 171, 2014 MBCA 61, 2014 MB.C. Lexis 172 (Manitoba Court of Appeal, June 13, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Lexis; General partnership; Political science; Download; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03139974770948781,"score_gpt":0.2670107917707297,"score_spread":0.23561104406124192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256695152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013970038,0.0055106175,0.0008427727,0.039330065,0.0007354623,0.00022000843,0.0024859246,0.00026173185,0.93664336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0599892,0.002614755,0.0006777057,0.03686077,0.000090345115,0.00020322844,0.0007525163,0.00006081354,0.89875066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987099,0.00012889552,0.000035297002,0.00011175848,0.0005748164,0.00043944214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794763,0.0003764056,0.00009124013,0.000051427185,0.0012660598,0.00026725695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001279547,0.0006645179,0.00025290332,0.0015225948,0.012845728,0.0052484153,0.0016970332,0.004534984,0.04263556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028993231,0.0010125104,0.00050634914,0.0018931157,0.0015987083,0.001921376,0.0011532848,0.0032642053,0.008476915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068079666,0.00006555941,0.0064366325,0.00019445502,0.000025874153,0.00046826198,0.0016423981,0.00015082124,0.0006696665,0.08540078,0.88847524,0.01640225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049623566,0.000047423982,0.014153119,0.0003915133,0.0000541077,0.00017691845,0.002779798,0.00040391236,0.0010680992,0.0029234102,0.97789335,0.000058681286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85576296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96957546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85576296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016280591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040339727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29017293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}