{"meta":{"query_hash":"fdd51a68d7fc","filters":{"venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics"},"cohort_total":64,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":64,"exported":64,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/fdd51a68d7fc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Gaming+Law+Review+and+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W1661077792","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.1948","title":"Aboriginal Gaming Challenges in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.11295550669460834,"score_gpt":0.3270983709033963,"score_spread":0.21414286420878792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1661077792","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32311028,0.50819236,0.0000031090021,0.023491716,0.00062098296,0.00032918085,0.0000063715593,0.000024926036,0.14422108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5608117,0.43771586,0.00010649043,0.0011468066,0.00010197804,0.000008406302,9.872067e-7,0.0000052762166,0.00010250623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992858,0.000054871765,0.00019432178,0.00017257819,0.00005707734,0.00023531898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959075,0.00006551834,0.000058524587,0.00010097762,0.00002367306,0.00016057852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008454852,0.000076162345,0.00023429231,0.000011926014,0.000097114695,0.000028915545,0.00012192676,0.000025504947,0.000017894019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000395916,0.00007880848,0.000017566083,0.000037253012,0.00006850451,0.0002126622,0.000014563685,0.000071152805,0.000010368747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005484674,0.000013620602,0.0045207124,0.0009370383,0.000010247728,0.000021166716,0.0042610615,0.00001837016,3.9689442e-7,0.8947454,0.0018065403,0.09365994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061403895,0.000007122345,0.00042917635,0.00034204544,0.000016884973,0.0000041654416,0.0017091623,0.000013545202,0.0000010145828,0.00080361794,0.99649817,0.0001137036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9072872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040223842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007435133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32137164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980009831","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.1769","title":"Ontario Court of Appeal Takes a Spin at Roulette: <i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp.</i> , 2013 ONCA 121, February 26, 2013","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Roulette; Appeal; Lottery; Law; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02047576640537435,"score_gpt":0.2381419362012918,"score_spread":0.21766616979591744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980009831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92084163,0.048695028,0.000015017326,0.004774069,0.00040519267,0.0010556151,0.000011549932,0.000047110836,0.02415476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437946,0.043561157,0.00048086248,0.00610228,0.0004611266,0.00008808155,0.000017638724,0.000049320137,0.005444907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982153,0.000079121965,0.0006995654,0.00042527125,0.00012389873,0.0004568423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891126,0.00008915885,0.00045755695,0.00022362958,0.00008690911,0.00023147951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073713594,0.00025749346,0.0008172993,0.00003686632,0.000518183,0.00018933942,0.00020076186,0.00015096557,0.0004803903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022389244,0.00024459563,0.00010515278,0.00006538686,0.00040508856,0.00075996347,0.00011554639,0.00021892317,0.000115006216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095603646,0.0004615571,0.4763683,0.014997805,0.00086879474,0.000040322717,0.06859565,0.00004219653,0.0003599792,0.1041502,0.25841236,0.07560724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036461678,0.000085905696,0.02207925,0.0013823297,0.00015835247,0.000022253691,0.00040982332,0.000019454814,0.000015014038,0.0006367306,0.97432995,0.00049631135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9447466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9614329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7159176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041783554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029380713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990479304","doi":"10.1089/glre.2008.12604","title":"Are Casino Games Patentable in Canada?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Advertising; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.11543179873105884,"score_gpt":0.31031883914602204,"score_spread":0.1948870404149632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990479304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9679699,0.025628736,2.8568022e-7,0.00013854158,0.00022221352,0.00014783641,0.00002334532,0.000008586324,0.0058605834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98313105,0.014684907,0.00003070181,0.0015458443,0.000014580107,0.000029751847,0.000010315126,0.00001216798,0.00054065534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993053,0.000022986538,0.00022693409,0.00021188968,0.000018578765,0.00021432605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996212,0.000018433851,0.00010260577,0.00018587976,0.000007928481,0.00006394226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006448352,0.00010767299,0.00031353408,0.000018208515,0.00006266907,0.000007061159,0.000057541318,0.00003047244,0.0001699181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003465985,0.00010386342,0.000028499691,0.00003337785,0.00002795078,0.000048661645,0.000018592667,0.00006858899,0.00004426356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036475615,0.00005190931,0.9906139,0.00013769703,0.000029208035,0.0002008953,0.00009620123,0.000002623133,4.743645e-7,0.0018631318,0.0013989812,0.005601362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006574711,0.000017643408,0.90901285,0.00025824422,0.0000921587,0.00031745638,0.00009432134,0.0000033694853,0.000010514728,0.000054303677,0.08925336,0.00022832326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6787308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7419995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08785438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015976404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006066501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42354274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992773862","doi":"10.1089/glre.2009.13505","title":"Canadian Tax Structuring for Gaming Ventures","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Structuring; Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Tax law; Advertising; Business; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; World Wide Web; Value-added tax","score_opus":0.015480023257049795,"score_gpt":0.2109649916487863,"score_spread":0.19548496839173649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992773862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.791994,0.0771905,0.0006568642,0.030412752,0.0017950919,0.0030584102,0.0000843032,0.00030808663,0.09450003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665372,0.0029181296,0.00045334996,0.029111173,0.00060124486,0.000014597033,0.00004546971,0.000015981175,0.0003028856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993915,0.0000020090633,0.00020279983,0.00018168642,0.00001799437,0.00020400452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963874,0.0000102695785,0.00018064186,0.00011492966,0.000029754856,0.00002569402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017288259,0.00011201259,0.00020293314,0.000054422133,0.0002142853,0.00018372449,0.000091893984,0.000029736151,0.000045942143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026884458,0.00011346232,0.000048253438,0.000052005387,0.000013933839,0.00042623217,0.000017018629,0.000048939848,0.000021792845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057641346,0.000009824306,0.0010695979,0.0020707843,0.000019928193,0.0000025337888,0.000021745771,0.00008689587,0.00004768436,0.821073,0.004932213,0.17066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001726473,0.000004680081,0.002452976,0.0002772213,0.000055447177,0.000002843712,0.000012411702,0.000752591,0.000015672636,0.0092613315,0.98678255,0.0002096187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052953158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027191874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042641976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018696575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99055934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025195404","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.1797","title":"Assessment Tool to Measure and Evaluate the Risk Potential of Gambling Products, ASTERIG: A Global Validation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Journal of Public Health; Art history; History; Political science; Law; Computer science; Health care; Public health policy; Health policy","score_opus":0.08754902457062169,"score_gpt":0.3714633990753765,"score_spread":0.2839143745047548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025195404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914521,0.005582662,0.000109521236,0.00055167754,0.00026154716,0.000960332,0.000031495852,0.000011955115,0.001038717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958208,0.0026641532,0.0010089001,0.0002727888,0.000041919124,0.00011497848,0.000012502643,0.000010127,0.00005381179],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904984,0.00011711252,0.00032375936,0.0002928029,0.000053846965,0.00016263349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941546,0.000018612458,0.00013593945,0.0003038483,0.00007592708,0.000050242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006375568,0.00013289173,0.00028242113,0.000015048125,0.00010737564,0.000073059564,0.00008165194,0.00004093039,0.000084471154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002135518,0.000095102776,0.000043353873,0.00005568558,0.00004301508,0.00011142334,0.00005696899,0.00006663884,0.00004319811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058570415,0.00048750784,0.19322966,0.001568303,0.0009812311,0.0000049173154,0.00081662857,0.000104348124,0.0007278529,0.03869514,0.0010411207,0.7622847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014341753,0.00030467857,0.98579067,0.0005036641,0.0020482317,0.00009626484,0.00012410636,0.0001180032,0.00012065896,0.0013752694,0.0076797716,0.00040452727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004398182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001742331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.792561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036791575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018721286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38781786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027819035","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14109","title":"Case Comment on <i>Canada v. Fischbacher</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Library science; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.020119470051829617,"score_gpt":0.2597711806890595,"score_spread":0.2396517106372299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027819035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29116294,0.021049937,0.0000045941792,0.07424915,0.0022324848,0.0009235704,0.000048658618,0.00006642163,0.6102622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96300864,0.006535165,0.000029361194,0.02988476,0.00028861078,0.0000107217265,0.0000018039568,0.0000067620135,0.00023418604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946713,0.000030224548,0.00017148862,0.00013349384,0.000038223865,0.00015941379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996156,0.000066774766,0.000075697004,0.00010740651,0.000018784212,0.00011574123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004617795,0.00007132611,0.00019286298,0.0000051463744,0.00042949722,0.000062628955,0.0000788711,0.000039938364,0.00007705939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046921934,0.00006529994,0.000023830375,0.000029452118,0.00007848726,0.00009571569,0.000020558473,0.00012201539,0.000010994336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016314682,0.000023252118,0.00033014786,0.0005403597,0.000019731258,0.000059193055,0.00048434577,9.3115807e-7,0.0000029200937,0.9465369,0.033164214,0.018836398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047180623,0.000007898605,0.000007826183,0.000076154116,0.000017523756,0.000029618119,0.000089632566,0.0000017764096,0.0000068775357,0.0003391097,0.9992874,0.00008898696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73358965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93322605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041557138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014122188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3303389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037572661","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.15406","title":"Betting on Reconciliation: Law, Self-Governance, and First Nations Economic Development in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Corporate governance; Tourism; Colonialism; Download; Law; Political science; Sociology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.018668336604557793,"score_gpt":0.1931828018412585,"score_spread":0.1745144652367007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037572661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34246898,0.02605671,9.4919784e-7,0.0022996617,0.0007217721,0.00053369085,0.000047868038,0.000028039452,0.6278423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82253903,0.1712686,0.0007405481,0.004273188,0.00012053451,0.000048941085,0.000007509477,0.000014791664,0.0009868826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994691,0.000018036262,0.0002101821,0.00014549388,0.000023565812,0.00013361189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970096,0.000054666198,0.00009535298,0.00006121536,0.000008164248,0.00007964863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028651187,0.000054609645,0.0001466799,0.000033717202,0.0007093851,0.000058693844,0.00006313281,0.000025339894,0.00013000294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019705294,0.00007662437,0.0000122712245,0.000029306606,0.000069263886,0.0001675669,0.000014645694,0.00004854312,0.000014373969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010549485,0.000007951371,0.0036066575,0.00035522913,0.000016182426,0.0000020361324,0.0039896737,0.0000036620788,1.4590368e-8,0.97506267,0.001079483,0.015875407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063256804,0.000002696381,0.0039232685,0.00017958465,0.000009036922,7.204143e-7,0.00009153916,0.0000063101957,6.043556e-7,0.0001113739,0.9955147,0.0000969199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9892014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025718817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012205838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6725381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068762313","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.1635","title":"The UIGEA, Canada and the “New” Fantasy Sports","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fantasy; Download; Media studies; Advertising; Sociology; Art; Literature; Computer science; World Wide Web; Business","score_opus":0.03410074490607685,"score_gpt":0.3003339783601601,"score_spread":0.2662332334540833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068762313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7309962,0.2435462,0.0000022985535,0.0020248673,0.0012309926,0.00045682595,0.000015867468,0.000013813031,0.02171292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697167,0.02685724,0.000016291018,0.0016972844,0.000086500935,0.000023308356,0.000005047608,0.000010770631,0.0015868149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994012,0.000034651195,0.00018770598,0.0001226092,0.000024705323,0.0002291421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994647,0.00010178801,0.000081816586,0.000251149,0.000005594898,0.000094942785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037146328,0.00010148053,0.00020455665,0.0000042534916,0.00022774302,0.00003139791,0.00007382308,0.000026578935,0.000058786773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000065425647,0.000055407163,0.000031714677,0.000016444403,0.00009500851,0.000047835194,0.000032397038,0.0000707594,0.000010985184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004226494,0.00005357497,0.20871165,0.00015496605,0.00026357017,0.0000096394515,0.0010156007,3.068684e-7,4.4202832e-7,0.5352399,0.015381717,0.23912643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006414735,0.000008008694,0.0828822,0.000053920405,0.00032060558,0.000109729386,0.000048983467,6.7846327e-7,0.0000027582728,0.00042451534,0.91538674,0.00012036955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13273662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15635097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90000504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002525682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002850168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87303853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083064927","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14205","title":"The Need for the Creation of a Framework for Aboriginal Gaming to Legally Exist in Canada: The Compelling Case of the Mohawks of Kahnawá:ke","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.04639817410377368,"score_gpt":0.36883229695378544,"score_spread":0.3224341228500118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083064927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913816,0.00452519,0.00042416024,0.0011671376,0.0005685901,0.0014235582,0.00010895585,0.000002259825,0.00039853883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785846,0.00080814614,0.0008080696,0.00028155485,0.000036788726,0.00014577762,0.0000032008486,0.000012997155,0.000045014403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916583,0.000038770304,0.00045302048,0.00014203979,0.00003258528,0.00016776344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813753,0.0010409311,0.00031273576,0.00042136593,0.00006160965,0.000025840114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064398895,0.00010703026,0.00029475166,0.000013305091,0.00020426532,0.000017251376,0.00022905332,0.000047436242,0.00000556815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059398553,0.000054343473,0.00009388849,0.000068257534,0.000113589704,0.000025785868,0.000021547816,0.00014035027,2.6111383e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014886733,0.00011371184,0.024818756,0.0007662558,0.00024132225,0.000003262287,0.0024817393,0.00023804918,0.000108499065,0.9077413,0.0001590195,0.06317923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009354626,0.0011598025,0.24922699,0.0070380233,0.0075683836,0.0008774772,0.0132929655,0.0044003837,0.004834506,0.031192748,0.6691942,0.001859888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18107322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54781425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8765485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041020725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012975564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8243801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237818976","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.1844","title":"Legislating and Regulating First Nations Internet Gaming: The Mohawk Council of Kahnawá:ke's Experience, 1999–2013","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mohawk; Download; The Internet; Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09995682470612084,"score_gpt":0.318804350006779,"score_spread":0.21884752530065815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237818976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94108593,0.020910304,0.00009555392,0.00038369448,0.00032024595,0.00038520814,0.000020967358,0.000031542317,0.03676657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99537015,0.0031284394,0.00042526115,0.00033925768,0.00004762666,0.000061017396,0.000007895367,0.000017849463,0.00060250727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898136,0.000051749605,0.00042332712,0.00028893264,0.000058970436,0.00019568141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903876,0.0002775467,0.00026063548,0.00031761147,0.000052059997,0.00005338128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057735667,0.0001543234,0.00033238484,0.000026725742,0.0002482315,0.000054328317,0.00012839028,0.00005800054,0.00006362805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008942841,0.00012084081,0.00005731529,0.000062623185,0.00018491336,0.00012132519,0.0000743486,0.000089608,0.0000122995925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028974033,0.00033873817,0.18021685,0.0024657876,0.00044179993,0.0000040390964,0.043029103,0.00007106685,0.000068480455,0.6349714,0.0019888973,0.1363749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018627023,0.00025014568,0.034276694,0.0024966605,0.00072268856,0.00017635092,0.001072383,0.0022886049,0.0001133595,0.000969793,0.95502585,0.00074477645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012093874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014008532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95303696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005627077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001922844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49277452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474419122","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.2046","title":"Canada's First Nations and the State of the First Nations' Gaming Sector in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.008102830885473972,"score_gpt":0.18196345054602955,"score_spread":0.17386061966055558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474419122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5658493,0.1399972,0.000008183992,0.1962776,0.0020107594,0.0022722336,0.0010583919,0.000016589927,0.09250977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9209255,0.07657811,0.0000042397032,0.0013364129,0.000026045918,0.000014867028,5.7972466e-7,0.0000040597747,0.0011102069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995307,0.000038681068,0.00018099224,0.00008672123,0.000048139085,0.00011481121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930906,0.00043020013,0.00009925379,0.00009528071,0.000021185759,0.000045028162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000315636,0.00004275222,0.00013707919,0.000035528614,0.0010536999,0.00004043384,0.0001193702,0.0000114880995,0.0000385125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022211173,0.000030614327,0.000019126697,0.00009707426,0.00030991767,0.00008165552,0.00002537632,0.000036820664,4.5018626e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007529091,0.000014242853,0.013345509,0.0021327166,0.000084211635,0.0000034954874,0.0070937644,0.00008804822,7.4193963e-7,0.92389584,0.02271717,0.030616747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001239438,6.946165e-7,0.004130989,0.0003023289,0.000013789325,6.676354e-7,0.00008746738,0.0000075330872,4.2326332e-7,0.00017055574,0.9951109,0.00005066813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97239375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013167227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002975593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8104314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556895110","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.2074","title":"Extending the Reno Model: Responsible Gambling Evaluation Guidelines for Gambling Operators, Public Policymakers, and Regulators","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre; Université Laval","keywords":"Law and economics; Business; Public economics; Accounting; Economics","score_opus":0.4033227568449514,"score_gpt":0.47102305763055047,"score_spread":0.06770030078559908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556895110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84969413,0.12928845,0.0014256644,0.015164586,0.00070257916,0.0021926237,0.000105673374,0.00011328141,0.00131299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9339418,0.05672863,0.0044454793,0.0030611749,0.0002706383,0.0005065245,0.000035017067,0.00008683362,0.0009239299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823266,0.00013219507,0.00061267975,0.00053731585,0.00007902225,0.00040609934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986804,0.0002321691,0.00022416386,0.00049895426,0.00023664263,0.00012768347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027752628,0.00024524197,0.00040695502,0.00010171929,0.00042732776,0.00014786432,0.0001527801,0.00010930362,0.000044361142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034373376,0.00015474996,0.00009888559,0.00009470449,0.0001151156,0.0003137255,0.000076368575,0.00007163115,0.000010897542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008606648,0.000085897256,0.0059567713,0.00044840234,0.00031191905,0.0000018251998,0.0005004301,0.00008019281,0.0003406014,0.5063836,0.003984514,0.48181978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019201063,0.0008356674,0.011925585,0.008349409,0.008195043,0.00074723765,0.0009364972,0.033122156,0.00109325,0.066875115,0.8445016,0.0042173704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006722504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006639891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8405171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010227202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008904854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63105196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206557481","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16714","title":"Haghdust v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>B.C.J. No. 489; 2012 BCCA 120; 2012 BC.C. LEXIS 1071</i> <i>(British Columbia Court of Appeal, March 13, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Appeal; Lottery; Political science; Law; History; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019119153864819303,"score_gpt":0.24734969958107533,"score_spread":0.22823054571625603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206557481","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18497899,0.5839524,0.00005005135,0.0034237425,0.0046423627,0.0032574963,0.0019482524,0.00021110776,0.21753557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25936273,0.61741906,0.00082880526,0.005910162,0.002730585,0.00018503783,0.00020678136,0.00012908666,0.11322776],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734086,0.00019353625,0.0008614287,0.00045684422,0.00019461071,0.00095273304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983779,0.00015665783,0.00044377273,0.00035995548,0.00023076111,0.0004309234],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015753785,0.00019841155,0.0009572194,0.00001784662,0.0016109445,0.0008925884,0.00030811102,0.00022643944,0.002864436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007250165,0.0003570551,0.00026237644,0.00018039445,0.0010377913,0.0015751985,0.00023956118,0.00026363603,0.0001441673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034561233,0.00015978608,0.01916813,0.0011134591,0.00012154593,0.0000055971286,0.00023165387,0.0000013221901,0.0000031805046,0.0012178413,0.9606692,0.017304806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003682585,0.00004026514,0.011468905,0.0008573897,0.00023890528,0.00006036646,0.000160746,0.0000062938643,3.4104858e-7,0.00017929467,0.98618287,0.00043635294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42447743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84487164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42039424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013950682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015818443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229673390","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19413","title":"Caesars Entertainment Operating Co. (Re) <i>[2015] O.J. No. 1201; 2015 ONSC 712 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 30, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entertainment; Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03101750018826518,"score_gpt":0.3015964477350956,"score_spread":0.27057894754683043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229673390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26501653,0.26405782,0.000040188203,0.016319495,0.0042039896,0.0032173125,0.00030583277,0.00016358317,0.44667527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3051358,0.5939652,0.008547561,0.04298998,0.0029646277,0.00028050362,0.00034012296,0.00016162884,0.0456146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983624,0.00014029215,0.00057204434,0.00034560202,0.0001661751,0.00041347658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989217,0.00006770704,0.00024094875,0.0002767447,0.00017686581,0.00031602333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016758479,0.00022952791,0.0006279913,0.0000063612365,0.0004783333,0.000117542964,0.00030998187,0.00017495223,0.00034647968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083117324,0.00020903662,0.00015240414,0.0000517583,0.00038837743,0.00042766362,0.000098847384,0.00022780163,0.0001774682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024200108,0.0002473269,0.0059617725,0.0024211921,0.0002906746,0.000009466859,0.06522046,0.00008068934,0.00006153048,0.04953338,0.8740756,0.0020737357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037804505,0.000059374765,0.000055425717,0.00043802292,0.00025221193,0.000004264707,0.0046405164,0.000026426078,0.000021879465,0.00013094636,0.9937117,0.0002811639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010065104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018653108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40106067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036162126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040225868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229795280","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.16315","title":"<i>Pineau v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation</i> <i>Case No. CV-10-00399497, [2011] O.J. No. 4360, 2011 ON.C. LEXIS 9344, 2011 ONSC 5822 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, October 5, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Philosophy; Statistics","score_opus":0.03211866439953598,"score_gpt":0.25939014346978134,"score_spread":0.22727147907024536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229795280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64089614,0.08871476,0.000057632344,0.0014335386,0.0050284965,0.0024679082,0.00019775172,0.00013882235,0.26106492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8744993,0.053358704,0.0014895712,0.008919718,0.0032773325,0.00015291484,0.0001090373,0.00014834145,0.05804506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747294,0.0001346131,0.0009928579,0.0005330329,0.00018031723,0.00068622176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808127,0.0001905535,0.00064667244,0.0003852756,0.00026846587,0.00042776437],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016568658,0.00040695907,0.0010461614,0.000067013854,0.0008141552,0.00019385645,0.00023767039,0.00023821903,0.0027632709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072914205,0.00039300937,0.00015589171,0.000046719844,0.0004493349,0.0013898736,0.00013002781,0.0003208037,0.0015544968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005335047,0.0018143012,0.1941467,0.020259704,0.001176764,0.00020917728,0.0486668,0.000028438031,0.00029022663,0.19934115,0.512868,0.020665238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044343868,0.00013780802,0.0012470697,0.0005209434,0.0004544909,0.00008100424,0.00023549492,0.000008343822,0.000023047054,0.000120646044,0.9961826,0.00054511067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57030684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6061011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4833146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003339129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000536271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231069132","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17510","title":"Haghdust v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>Case No. S105520, S113596; [2013] B.C.J. No. 16; 2013 BCSC 16; 2013 BC.C. LEXIS 16 (British Columbia Supreme Court, January 8, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Lottery; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0129013025445982,"score_gpt":0.21364379227761165,"score_spread":0.20074248973301345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231069132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77911645,0.17590116,0.000028664957,0.0073137353,0.0029125456,0.005749794,0.0014459774,0.00032438998,0.02720731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13220786,0.67032206,0.0014344554,0.09586632,0.003047081,0.001021284,0.002354405,0.00043578062,0.09331078],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953289,0.00016912907,0.0017072674,0.0012939337,0.00024560632,0.0012551853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965233,0.00020775571,0.0006063597,0.0011694044,0.0004937871,0.0009993985],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067287264,0.0005774415,0.0020604287,0.00004424366,0.00075711694,0.002319392,0.00041933017,0.00037426176,0.017424593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008046132,0.0009738618,0.0005721781,0.000150786,0.00045974442,0.0013591975,0.00045928423,0.0007939864,0.0034430241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018394387,0.00027595033,0.0055646473,0.0025977895,0.00024298535,0.00065762684,0.000013634803,0.0000015495801,0.000013756532,0.000014099657,0.9733507,0.017248843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025608982,0.0004468168,0.0015814062,0.0036987024,0.0008780783,0.011426841,0.00006481439,0.00023437201,0.0000033441445,0.00016845348,0.9778157,0.0011205944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86563367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7490703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6469086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005974255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017765543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231234638","doi":"10.1089/glre.2008.13111","title":"Bear Hills Charitable Foundation v. Alberta (Gaming and Liquor Commission), <i>[2008] A.J. No. 1431</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Foundation (evidence); Download; Political science; Library science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.015426669396747698,"score_gpt":0.2679643827990066,"score_spread":0.2525377134022589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231234638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06189106,0.18130976,0.00009171369,0.04091084,0.0011882907,0.0019241866,0.000022011627,0.00015845444,0.7125037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80399835,0.17702141,0.00042119776,0.009101728,0.0009307443,0.000018467814,0.000024405941,0.00002255293,0.008461133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999063,0.000055822773,0.00031845734,0.00024689786,0.000055860743,0.0002599235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994196,0.00008850331,0.00015494919,0.00011983919,0.000059794256,0.00015730898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006722523,0.00012432176,0.00036134658,0.000018618131,0.0007180914,0.00021275412,0.00011020772,0.00008084556,0.000066261455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015914187,0.00011860891,0.000039467646,0.00007146321,0.00012247256,0.0006086908,0.00003095552,0.00008917152,0.00006800893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001417866,0.00010977974,0.0014350303,0.0021517053,0.000055971424,0.000002694421,0.003496566,0.0000030244094,0.000079181125,0.82634145,0.010769635,0.15554078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011286769,0.000036634745,0.0001745305,0.0005606318,0.000041592215,0.0000031998272,0.000054333603,0.000024718518,0.000009363756,0.0022206565,0.9965904,0.00017112416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015119946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051058466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005051418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006563331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99143845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233329049","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.181012","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen and Lorena Lam <i>[2014] A.J. No. 428, 2014 ABPC 90 LEXIS 420 (Alberta Provincial Court, April 17, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Lexis; Art; Political science; Law; Biology; Botany; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018510656965219644,"score_gpt":0.26642897037290825,"score_spread":0.2479183134076886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233329049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22345367,0.09283423,0.0003136959,0.12458489,0.0024614187,0.004663891,0.00019580171,0.00028526346,0.5512071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64321434,0.30763966,0.00086111616,0.020683268,0.0059149032,0.000111779074,0.0000715573,0.000118668395,0.021384688],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998202,0.00022824408,0.0004756534,0.0004831216,0.000118353244,0.00049261976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984916,0.00053884985,0.0002640547,0.00039017881,0.00007094436,0.00024437206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002154751,0.00025784117,0.0006029658,0.000018415725,0.0008255781,0.00026514602,0.00040156185,0.00014491855,0.00017044332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018908601,0.00019743582,0.00011703255,0.0000414237,0.0006505954,0.0004707078,0.000167584,0.0002194827,0.0005192851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037119917,0.00006242886,0.033477914,0.0023915628,0.00013536376,0.0000024608933,0.0027483166,0.0000056866797,0.000007448257,0.39765286,0.50329274,0.060186133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013600625,0.000053169224,0.00169431,0.000280222,0.00019880643,0.000003216255,0.000052138992,0.000018410356,0.0000047175404,0.0015199438,0.9957458,0.0002932546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033334393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034413077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52982247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006713979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010994001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233389050","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.16314","title":"<i>Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba Ltd.</i> <i>[2011] M.J. No. 305; 2011 MBQB 225, 2011 MB.C. LEXIS 845 (Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Centre, September 16, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Lexis; General partnership; Art; Humanities; Political science; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0326076102925209,"score_gpt":0.2605759400749266,"score_spread":0.22796832978240572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233389050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28242505,0.12966849,0.000097428456,0.0076315845,0.0024036835,0.0041919993,0.001663701,0.00025913442,0.57165897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9031119,0.08051498,0.00073957694,0.0044828346,0.0013327654,0.00011156084,0.0002811176,0.00012734337,0.00929795],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976413,0.00015601379,0.00090052595,0.00041674357,0.00015637271,0.00072899763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778044,0.00017638436,0.00073800643,0.0005867709,0.00024676256,0.00047160796],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010492109,0.0003266654,0.00080598675,0.000047587328,0.00042056377,0.00006267474,0.00045520446,0.00017998292,0.0017030234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003357729,0.0003283547,0.0002262461,0.00007582827,0.0006148298,0.00054104096,0.00012916996,0.00022354655,0.0008581507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029919134,0.0005300549,0.1676706,0.0025477884,0.00032688695,0.0000024434203,0.0019151522,0.0000129830305,0.000038989878,0.36631662,0.45370498,0.0069035767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026548593,0.000023954533,0.0025609569,0.00021531303,0.00026877064,0.0000021220483,0.0004530007,0.0000077124205,0.000112632835,0.000422563,0.9952837,0.00038378983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06899349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16932201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6206868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012507569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026049034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233760448","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20910","title":"Paton Estate v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Commission (c.o.b. Fallsview Casino Resort)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Estate; Commission; Download; Real estate; Advertising; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02501758896512817,"score_gpt":0.26404554970336713,"score_spread":0.23902796073823895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233760448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7112659,0.1174337,0.00006067402,0.0077603264,0.00055546034,0.000958287,0.000020053607,0.00010711879,0.16183846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7466536,0.24958397,0.00007796678,0.0012434354,0.00015552086,0.00001279774,0.0000018056967,0.000015596335,0.0022552914],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896526,0.00008577961,0.0003508978,0.0002711675,0.000057630154,0.00026927068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938565,0.00010588657,0.00016832074,0.00013652586,0.000032834556,0.00017075009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008317369,0.00013425261,0.0003945702,0.000018520304,0.00047020393,0.00011442468,0.00010507121,0.00007244944,0.0000698309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056676916,0.000097442506,0.00004375482,0.000039068418,0.00019710281,0.00041400242,0.00006658239,0.000076881945,0.000021499036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017132055,0.000045440323,0.030970663,0.0031700754,0.00006842529,0.000018159693,0.008266067,3.418801e-7,0.00006011243,0.16033506,0.0022376794,0.79481083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014268004,0.000021784503,0.0012483991,0.0020358295,0.000048309103,0.000008209324,0.00008973503,9.662949e-7,0.000009617984,0.0008755059,0.9953366,0.00018236713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1162331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25080833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014116053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121237805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88965195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235003937","doi":"10.1089/glre.2008.13112","title":"B-Filer, Inc. v. TD Canada Trust, <i>[2008] A.J. No. 1397</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.009243825721817865,"score_gpt":0.17507994017470252,"score_spread":0.16583611445288465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235003937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3154251,0.10332657,0.000023449478,0.013890987,0.0022520428,0.0012935967,0.00008316768,0.00023223998,0.56347287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56193453,0.08211378,0.0002717254,0.34768668,0.003466408,0.000032106054,0.00023481771,0.00007489985,0.004185016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905205,0.0000038531066,0.0003405966,0.0002717655,0.00005285406,0.00027887372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938935,0.000012695277,0.00027146313,0.00024177946,0.000058841986,0.000025889412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018811415,0.00019331428,0.00038714198,0.000020211692,0.00016651725,0.00015338317,0.00016772059,0.000041443338,0.000207067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021333482,0.00018667911,0.000050753286,0.000088591,0.00003088481,0.00067203713,0.00006348363,0.000099391335,0.0002018941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020847945,0.000066543675,0.0028004088,0.0025671667,0.000052001855,0.000032582087,0.000008479754,0.000031346473,0.000023217972,0.38813147,0.49579692,0.110469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018909232,0.000006039101,0.0013139575,0.00022013267,0.00006854193,0.0000045082143,0.0000037469863,0.00023947087,0.000002980242,0.00077991094,0.99691856,0.00025305295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14525683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21117763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55928785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057239577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000626179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.860435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235758395","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.19112","title":"Ross v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>[2014] B.C.J. No. 612, 2014 BCSC 320, 2014 BC.C. LEXIS 975 (British Columbia Supreme Court, March 5, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Supreme court; Lottery; Law; Columbia university; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Media studies","score_opus":0.01979959897980959,"score_gpt":0.23882911682620184,"score_spread":0.21902951784639224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235758395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61387974,0.35135865,0.00004230984,0.004244363,0.0027915381,0.0032960481,0.0015526861,0.0002883332,0.022546327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.113191634,0.74081326,0.0023564645,0.09027421,0.003015863,0.00040323887,0.0025206292,0.00042112512,0.047003597],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967751,0.00014022778,0.0010973426,0.0009298944,0.00022015888,0.0008373036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976413,0.000111221496,0.0003694428,0.00082166534,0.00025615728,0.0008001675],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011808247,0.0003303414,0.0015186376,0.000023114926,0.00037381108,0.0014787295,0.00033986295,0.00021683525,0.0032754168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000651294,0.00058996014,0.00033336814,0.000068637,0.00032947498,0.00053583307,0.00035328083,0.00049643207,0.0011526694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029713425,0.00015609937,0.027284784,0.0015040376,0.00013970298,0.00017519433,0.000015300751,0.0000012079682,0.000011536553,0.000025264002,0.96192265,0.008734532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026116015,0.00040082866,0.0068909856,0.0020973815,0.0006215592,0.0022668978,0.000025986423,0.000086628905,0.0000029059556,0.00017119426,0.9841393,0.00068471907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39036787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34058952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50068814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027819868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023426057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236156617","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19311","title":"Majewski v. Complex Services, Inc. <i>[2015] O.J. No. 272; 2015 ON.C. LEXIS 271 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 21, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.043939828973301454,"score_gpt":0.30508930869622986,"score_spread":0.2611494797229284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236156617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07835236,0.12558484,0.000016565877,0.026037015,0.003028128,0.0020951703,0.00052603224,0.00013171205,0.76422817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5478296,0.34600267,0.007838814,0.045986235,0.0043993522,0.00020976344,0.00073863025,0.0001999952,0.04679493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859744,0.00008670547,0.0005226013,0.0003077028,0.00013651542,0.00034901974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988884,0.000078129706,0.00024215718,0.00029677185,0.00022529672,0.00026927225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008813342,0.00020764812,0.00064018124,0.0000330404,0.0005242889,0.00007780044,0.0002330454,0.00013546977,0.0001811515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030144376,0.00018618155,0.000105209416,0.00008298128,0.000384423,0.00031590724,0.00014531039,0.00018155237,0.00017587814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006887507,0.0002666832,0.0034678695,0.003672719,0.00030537683,0.000011851184,0.013331935,0.00011798249,0.000006926543,0.2670149,0.70767784,0.0040570204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032774004,0.00007707776,0.0006281734,0.00027415922,0.00025148687,0.0000049110063,0.00077500514,0.000053506286,9.674809e-7,0.00029147457,0.9970815,0.00023398314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05264457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17569382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7174333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021766218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002954831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95366395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237992252","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14310","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 212 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Political science; Volume (thermodynamics); Humanities; Library science; Media studies; Law and economics; Art; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.0355278059403537,"score_gpt":0.25742701748253416,"score_spread":0.22189921154218045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237992252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87759054,0.011457268,0.0000028708891,0.00758362,0.001799214,0.00074541214,0.00001973759,0.00006192422,0.1007394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406996,0.051650364,0.0018768553,0.0018204221,0.00047976,0.00003651068,0.000014806368,0.000018373745,0.003403329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924064,0.000027019361,0.00028772338,0.00018144092,0.00005933691,0.00020386105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994439,0.0000872942,0.00019565581,0.00011166924,0.000084208266,0.00007729947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055377436,0.00010979023,0.00032546502,0.000010120099,0.0005856774,0.000048473703,0.00013669117,0.00007998028,0.00016421128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017850247,0.00009802821,0.00007448889,0.000041180127,0.00026262287,0.0002152249,0.00006233866,0.00017095156,0.000030340247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016272297,0.00016561039,0.059249334,0.0035698763,0.00033680213,0.0000020045607,0.06137159,0.0000149084235,0.0005156771,0.82385373,0.008602003,0.04230217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120531404,0.0000135196315,0.0041696397,0.00020069738,0.000062081606,8.9954e-7,0.00019130294,0.000007550407,0.000032204134,0.0003476694,0.99468756,0.00016637416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16521642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73898906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98608553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010993977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049886294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84034246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238408455","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19411","title":"Merpaw v. Hyde (c.o.b. City Limits Convenience) <i>[2015] O.J. No. 800; 2015 ONSC 1053 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, February 20, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Humanities; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05733022544795584,"score_gpt":0.3092049537484531,"score_spread":0.25187472830049723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238408455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7447571,0.15210347,0.000018957711,0.016927015,0.0031218412,0.0021326852,0.00017000864,0.00015212403,0.0806168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7290455,0.24325351,0.00384524,0.007884985,0.0013464789,0.0001343913,0.000077964316,0.00007752557,0.014334385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979114,0.00016648334,0.0006978499,0.00045580103,0.00021139196,0.0005570914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983603,0.000177962,0.000371319,0.0002844403,0.0003674917,0.00043852758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015871425,0.0003046294,0.00097167137,0.000024215939,0.00061484,0.00009293392,0.0003715477,0.00015556178,0.00014873281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038320804,0.00026877574,0.00017195873,0.000104857405,0.00090492255,0.0006361733,0.00014156682,0.00025494618,0.0002136426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020446556,0.0008005726,0.083019614,0.0063943234,0.0011561259,0.000032639233,0.085967235,0.00008537379,0.0002839531,0.099396735,0.71082056,0.011838405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047001263,0.0000921615,0.002880279,0.00041033074,0.0004721912,0.0000051546185,0.0013902462,0.000024951207,0.00003314593,0.00017261102,0.9935989,0.00045006364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09998837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18492712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2827783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049805944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003754876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238753586","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19310","title":"Edgewater Casino v. Chubb-Kennedy <i>[2015] B.C.J. No. 32; 2015 BCCA 9; 2015 BC.C. LEXIS 34 (British Columbia Court of Appeal, January 13, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Appeal; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025307861219641,"score_gpt":0.28011216233711034,"score_spread":0.2548043011174693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238753586","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12325299,0.4442981,0.000036884823,0.02467774,0.005370065,0.0034247655,0.0008866961,0.00023220605,0.39782056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43379858,0.48929378,0.001984601,0.0069501386,0.003669236,0.00020224808,0.00031592714,0.00015969547,0.06362577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979523,0.00015355833,0.000716759,0.0004489602,0.00017465462,0.000553766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984392,0.00007219721,0.0003481804,0.00035998854,0.0003831389,0.00039728516],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014969654,0.00021502834,0.0008443236,0.000028332526,0.0007124148,0.00031648655,0.00027366338,0.00017614101,0.00020982797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010703819,0.00026031444,0.0001847742,0.0001385875,0.0007325282,0.0005378928,0.00019409237,0.00017078912,0.0001961301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070945334,0.000068376496,0.0017662391,0.0004627565,0.00009042998,0.000008353131,0.00077443203,0.000008000162,0.0000018518228,0.0029806416,0.99169266,0.0021391332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046922528,0.00007874744,0.00048707973,0.00042996064,0.00018045657,0.000025032628,0.00042439307,0.00002447143,0.0000020703258,0.00065337657,0.9968749,0.00035024917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12327327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23643163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33419478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018870532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029033318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239787302","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20212","title":"Babstock v. Atlantic Lottery Corp. <i>[2015] N.J. No. 299, 2015 NLTD(G) 116, Docket: 201201G2257 (Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court Trial Division—General Division, September 3, 2015)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Supreme court; Division (mathematics); Law; Political science; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.016800330589375436,"score_gpt":0.2714741729619923,"score_spread":0.25467384237261687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239787302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9343542,0.051500116,0.00011795381,0.009952559,0.0011793597,0.0015101704,0.00015184742,0.00006520752,0.0011686141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8094003,0.14308205,0.00090395584,0.03066068,0.0025153537,0.00014160707,0.00039047678,0.00019325894,0.01271227],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977057,0.0001019682,0.0008445363,0.00066346675,0.00015344542,0.0005309092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828607,0.00021437068,0.0002971594,0.00063508825,0.00010089026,0.00046643076],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070889783,0.00044898843,0.0011441914,0.000058467416,0.00021330126,0.00014055084,0.0001641172,0.00014378257,0.0006571861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005254332,0.000303404,0.00021664509,0.000053357526,0.00018604555,0.0005940361,0.00027301456,0.00021053407,0.00045912983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002850021,0.00048415453,0.07391956,0.0033192518,0.0005745313,0.00010181944,0.00009388465,0.000002131539,0.0005461813,0.0026754672,0.89180714,0.02362585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017075103,0.0006663638,0.0090479,0.0019851376,0.00062412984,0.00024507326,0.000005076327,0.000070107555,0.000020924315,0.000114550705,0.96956825,0.0005773531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011545863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005924002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12495383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011538851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006779876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240039888","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18615","title":"Nova Growth Corp. v. Kepinski <i>2014 CarswellOnt 6335, 2014 ONSC 2763 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice [Commercial List], May 12, 2014</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Download; Economic Justice; CITES; Law; Humanities; Politics; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.02529310089975424,"score_gpt":0.2676874636780195,"score_spread":0.24239436277826526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240039888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2587857,0.107267626,0.00041021922,0.011813761,0.005678198,0.002752757,0.00015290815,0.00021315594,0.6129257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9331099,0.059523005,0.00027714597,0.0042787176,0.0010856575,0.000023076265,0.000020933216,0.000038395203,0.0016432011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979273,0.00019684284,0.0007960383,0.00044529844,0.00014981779,0.00048469257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859965,0.00023212035,0.00044779372,0.00030849033,0.00016118148,0.0002507906],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020054486,0.00027060352,0.0010054483,0.00003964811,0.0005720572,0.00014905722,0.00038635495,0.00018487046,0.00044045848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017486209,0.0002637863,0.00017680532,0.00006710909,0.00045030267,0.00042085233,0.00010598521,0.00023013135,0.0001893767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000678302,0.0002613829,0.038525958,0.010606512,0.000238481,0.000006663044,0.007992,0.000015488009,0.00008427729,0.6946017,0.22999586,0.017603856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030171356,0.000076791024,0.0011936353,0.00054872304,0.00038140436,0.0000061462742,0.00014412761,0.000010086425,0.000038671853,0.00060826994,0.9963272,0.00036322753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37646917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5031607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7663313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000182011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031101963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240456741","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17911","title":"Dennis v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming CorpCase No. C55923, [2013] O.J. No. 3468; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 3610; 2013 ONCA 501 (Ontario Court of Appeal, July 31, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Appeal; Lexis; Art; Humanities; Download; Advertising; Art history; Political science; Law; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.024288057881616046,"score_gpt":0.24798813914238224,"score_spread":0.22370008126076618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240456741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7842849,0.07050489,0.000034995355,0.006401114,0.0022592822,0.0031154922,0.00007422667,0.00012313951,0.133202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5976018,0.340701,0.001896497,0.009856938,0.002100434,0.0003038131,0.00007490333,0.00016166731,0.04730298],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973988,0.000112549795,0.0009914382,0.0006433587,0.00017371618,0.0006801655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799204,0.0001958461,0.0006909554,0.00039937298,0.00031166547,0.00041011872],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00105526,0.00041529624,0.0011449333,0.00007144591,0.0006924028,0.00036170337,0.00035646913,0.00024794313,0.0005702618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007525318,0.00039138572,0.00017075449,0.000090861344,0.00048948557,0.00093286013,0.00015846039,0.00037296998,0.0013267183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010270541,0.00060538016,0.018561667,0.008630099,0.0006287248,0.000033348024,0.016454015,0.000042469677,0.000066132954,0.021114217,0.90626794,0.02749328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042625662,0.00016312774,0.0011190345,0.001422915,0.00014009791,0.000012770083,0.00013776986,0.000031623094,0.000007332527,0.0004828893,0.9955523,0.0005038916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91632056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9030843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27019614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041107743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000567927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240459957","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14311","title":"Seguin v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 170 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Library science; Political science; Computer science; Physics; World Wide Web; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.015768754411924858,"score_gpt":0.24965488114398846,"score_spread":0.2338861267320636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240459957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17189202,0.014427267,0.0000060839475,0.01981925,0.0035952567,0.000718182,0.00003424245,0.00008861893,0.78941905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7099036,0.15597712,0.004582188,0.026641881,0.0031134656,0.00010700858,0.00004879814,0.00006571144,0.09956023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993829,0.000020583086,0.00018547317,0.00016998027,0.00003446357,0.00020656193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958605,0.00003845318,0.000071032555,0.00015325488,0.000045682995,0.00010550703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040097118,0.000086732114,0.00022107713,0.000009649594,0.0006658825,0.000068714544,0.00009427599,0.000062509105,0.00037067733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003908327,0.00007734992,0.00006597081,0.000034767054,0.00025214464,0.00013168341,0.000050944822,0.0001544483,0.0000788165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021610183,0.000031604864,0.0032192739,0.00029024543,0.000053748652,0.0000022430029,0.003414324,0.0000012283449,0.000019903193,0.95496345,0.02529671,0.012705097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006416112,0.000007240738,0.0007924225,0.0000452951,0.00004270664,0.0000026636228,0.00003846446,0.0000030983051,0.0000018947952,0.00064249814,0.9982466,0.00011296468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06890277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7307811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97294986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005023112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010276187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93729746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241392334","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.151113","title":"Loveless v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>[2011] O.J. No. 3783; 2011 ON.C. LEXIS 6128; 2011 ONSC 4744 (August 20, 2011)</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Lottery; Download; Art; Advertising; Business; Humanities; World Wide Web; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.041678359557531075,"score_gpt":0.22954675399185226,"score_spread":0.18786839443432118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241392334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7771163,0.117578775,0.00003795453,0.0025321236,0.0013660681,0.001625278,0.00017699046,0.00012603923,0.099440455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36449516,0.40524983,0.005715021,0.17158377,0.0019788323,0.00024320882,0.0007101278,0.00050084,0.049523205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978707,0.000050122264,0.0007380667,0.00069574005,0.000094596726,0.00055078074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984389,0.00008514047,0.000306214,0.00069164956,0.00006545343,0.00041265975],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044436986,0.00048208822,0.0010895418,0.00007197627,0.00019869133,0.00006149611,0.00019217265,0.00015179414,0.0054931566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008563202,0.0004365982,0.00020771843,0.000020185378,0.00019857353,0.00038302733,0.00021831153,0.00046407155,0.0019569267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001919989,0.002277647,0.13519312,0.016754342,0.0020626958,0.0008776664,0.003090007,0.0000037390446,0.0005019778,0.03524003,0.685179,0.11689975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018198988,0.00072432583,0.009000395,0.001562615,0.00094608153,0.00060199405,0.000052651285,0.00003294966,0.00020444975,0.00014691107,0.9840899,0.0008177902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030787319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009138881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41262117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019743973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012550042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241511357","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17717","title":"Manitoba Jockey Club v. ManitobaCase No. CI13-01-82759, [2013] M.J. NO. 135, 2013 MBQB (Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Centre, May 6, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Club; Political science; Art; Law; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.01608432383982389,"score_gpt":0.24306526855072588,"score_spread":0.226980944710902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241511357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5353858,0.1570453,0.000047761525,0.08447964,0.009047719,0.008688528,0.00064197567,0.00041742262,0.20424584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2994134,0.68070734,0.0020283174,0.0055008573,0.00322856,0.00019000872,0.00014605424,0.0001253134,0.008660131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997524,0.00016891518,0.000881903,0.0005403412,0.00017882984,0.0007059892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980531,0.00016818175,0.00049380225,0.0004912943,0.00046352917,0.0003301151],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006342467,0.00037909453,0.00087200146,0.00006292888,0.0010497287,0.0001984599,0.00035904345,0.0002034354,0.0007784878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089138055,0.00034401982,0.00026389016,0.0001411836,0.0006555625,0.00075911987,0.00022689423,0.0002444369,0.0017450397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024078372,0.00027555347,0.00610035,0.0025311315,0.00041886905,0.000016731117,0.0014925484,0.000054561628,0.000015871507,0.1266863,0.8495157,0.012868346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000347306,0.00005374626,0.001868382,0.00047090984,0.00022581425,0.0000071584896,0.0015970395,0.00011328966,0.000006388681,0.00090095476,0.99393636,0.0004726765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13524231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13389185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52366203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001985056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010730584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242206263","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19611","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Nicky Fortunato <i>[2015] O.J. No. 1502; 2015 ONSC 1845 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, March 20, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Biology; Zoology; Hymenoptera","score_opus":0.06143848215864963,"score_gpt":0.32837721160953137,"score_spread":0.26693872945088176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242206263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59250003,0.22812371,0.0000748898,0.08639139,0.0019571115,0.003102699,0.00030401233,0.00011034618,0.087435834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7469008,0.22316441,0.00202129,0.007464531,0.0014461873,0.00009895621,0.00006458405,0.00009003745,0.018749237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998463,0.00014010111,0.000515937,0.0003344134,0.00014813658,0.00039843668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869424,0.00027042447,0.00020720015,0.00033678528,0.0001696137,0.00032172844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024688242,0.00019923909,0.0006050877,0.000021924328,0.000377999,0.00012120532,0.00033677198,0.00011564128,0.00009233247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001542567,0.00015825838,0.00009081474,0.000062975014,0.0006145488,0.00043114086,0.00017441272,0.00021060655,0.00008129083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015269757,0.00019417054,0.15791799,0.007144648,0.0004054016,0.000018856686,0.01713684,0.000015081765,0.000014736625,0.227527,0.5586264,0.030846138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019140134,0.00006223212,0.0015768344,0.0003791364,0.00044862565,0.0000066942966,0.00057743763,0.000009866525,0.0000031523252,0.00080670224,0.9957193,0.00021861232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05612262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10972293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43709287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014750496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039851773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95016277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242221348","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17910","title":"Ontario First Nations Limited Partnership v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>Case No. CV-12-461369, [2013] O.J. No. 2800; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 2992; 2013 ONSC 4166 (Ontario Court of Justice, June 17, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; General partnership; Download; Law; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.03532596529928986,"score_gpt":0.2548350094174521,"score_spread":0.21950904411816222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242221348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53815705,0.03196847,0.000044476365,0.013292249,0.0036903846,0.0045770723,0.00011117318,0.00017326183,0.40798587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78959787,0.08097516,0.0010124065,0.0057597253,0.0013982676,0.00037789557,0.00011985593,0.00011797206,0.12064082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700415,0.00013436144,0.0011678004,0.0007210333,0.00022420836,0.00074845966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972643,0.00057298684,0.0007781727,0.00046252884,0.00044396837,0.00047802008],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010981743,0.00048556158,0.0011453087,0.00013300001,0.001630016,0.00043537022,0.0003438523,0.00027789344,0.0020020884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015911736,0.00047875525,0.00019423178,0.00015837274,0.0005177096,0.0012413335,0.0001504711,0.0005078805,0.0005617527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115217226,0.00084885466,0.055840366,0.008835652,0.00084833446,0.000097673816,0.036803737,0.00021361293,0.00001554058,0.053608105,0.83927625,0.0034966234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052364345,0.00012539933,0.0018250709,0.0016018118,0.0004385128,0.00004177571,0.00032855777,0.000059386428,0.0000028166533,0.0002481096,0.9942119,0.0005929785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28734502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069976243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077235344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242254569","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18111","title":"Michigan vs. The Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians <i>Case No. 13-1438, 2013 WL 6645395 (U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, December 18, 2013)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribe; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01944810771552718,"score_gpt":0.2532683744881838,"score_spread":0.2338202667726566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242254569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60445845,0.17214102,0.00016137229,0.012801144,0.0018780247,0.0031996835,0.00033657218,0.00010584222,0.20491788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9065859,0.09039402,0.000037911348,0.0019865409,0.00039020757,0.00002092864,0.000010431999,0.000023558438,0.00055052876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981999,0.00021976343,0.0007817109,0.0003053975,0.00012661346,0.00036665713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839234,0.00031241827,0.0006412244,0.00033663266,0.00015708427,0.00016028374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020904415,0.00020440809,0.0008215646,0.0000313632,0.00046069588,0.00008997242,0.00034026027,0.00014643391,0.00011389836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020568042,0.00015836091,0.0001522902,0.00013999452,0.00046702696,0.00028376695,0.000077255536,0.00016411504,0.000058533195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014024161,0.0007766507,0.019341493,0.029360287,0.0011014275,0.000043741857,0.02870173,0.00017175647,0.00021687175,0.6875134,0.12756726,0.10506514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026000332,0.00006431377,0.00016138608,0.00061636727,0.00016253171,0.000019128867,0.00031702634,0.000031005944,0.000035500358,0.0016266969,0.996466,0.00024004221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034381807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059495285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86889875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000302099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015518702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97204834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242279659","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161112","title":"<i>R. v. Trins</i> <i>Case No. A10-7330-30Z; [2012] A.J. No. 600; 2012 ABPC 156; 2012 AB.C. LEXIS 1108 (Alberta Provincial Court, June 11, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01901146512330852,"score_gpt":0.26681222964717793,"score_spread":0.2478007645238694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242279659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026556974,0.46973142,0.00009575649,0.009640594,0.011981752,0.004012718,0.00035763773,0.00032546304,0.47729766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.318409,0.37697786,0.0010313742,0.023507735,0.027507024,0.0005566063,0.00018299432,0.000392992,0.25143442],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629426,0.00027538204,0.0011590375,0.0006580694,0.00021383396,0.0013994157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973233,0.00031309802,0.00071309437,0.00052647357,0.00028125386,0.0008428257],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025864865,0.00054658897,0.0012714138,0.00006979281,0.0013585982,0.0003315109,0.00047989172,0.00037916822,0.0009359411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030574962,0.0005187193,0.0002968357,0.00023104789,0.0004943344,0.0045969677,0.00021137236,0.00036446852,0.0022072587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009305061,0.0005946443,0.0024801218,0.0056157447,0.00025145858,0.00004049033,0.0028901598,0.0000030672368,0.000038753147,0.18862928,0.78188574,0.017477486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048093914,0.00004565854,0.000053703712,0.00048360854,0.00027021085,0.000097752185,0.00012075761,0.0000065847075,0.000011032614,0.00023900086,0.9974881,0.00070267566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03926157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12580943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29185203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022599335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003637058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243184977","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20513","title":"R. v. Dey <i>No.: 500-73-004217-143; [2016] Q.J. No. 2333; 2016 QCCQ 1670 (Court of Québec [Criminal and Penal Division] District of Montréal, March 21, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Health, Medicine and Society","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Law; Criminal court; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Arithmetic; International law","score_opus":0.03771702997297455,"score_gpt":0.3294438888148218,"score_spread":0.29172685884184724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243184977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63498276,0.29850766,0.0007541002,0.021387056,0.0017797331,0.0038542033,0.0008864449,0.00010307094,0.03774497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17103401,0.81350815,0.0012646847,0.0074659633,0.00054179505,0.00009832829,0.000034406752,0.00007123229,0.005981423],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969098,0.00035337,0.0015042532,0.00046926716,0.00013243142,0.0006308906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680406,0.0012500492,0.00074834673,0.0005420193,0.00025016064,0.0004053752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022139186,0.00030133215,0.001239747,0.00004608903,0.0004424728,0.000007621949,0.00023157173,0.00032197323,0.00041010542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045439985,0.00019268254,0.00016969358,0.000064761276,0.00035709268,0.0002328359,0.00023067386,0.0005019574,0.00024378288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024288803,0.00038082871,0.02997941,0.05927852,0.00035220667,0.000010535871,0.003878054,7.4713864e-7,0.00089779333,0.010374544,0.65701944,0.23758507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015704425,0.00034275177,0.007270347,0.00961615,0.00028318985,0.000007632061,0.0003452005,0.000047981608,0.000014836816,0.00016133816,0.98001367,0.0003264352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016940985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024633703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5150005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016031282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010122558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243198121","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14412","title":"Dennis v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp., <i>[2010] O.J. No. 1223 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Download; Volume (thermodynamics); Law and economics; Political science; Advertising; Economics; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02510372144971111,"score_gpt":0.2576572364137912,"score_spread":0.23255351496408005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243198121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6117949,0.023607602,0.000053515054,0.004635555,0.0055107954,0.001104937,0.000033719076,0.00018322993,0.35307574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9194669,0.043669056,0.0011452001,0.013592587,0.0022953302,0.00006396515,0.000028206787,0.0000611568,0.019677574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986954,0.00004800391,0.00042839503,0.0003415993,0.00008359841,0.0004030391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912024,0.000090663154,0.00023060793,0.00025218632,0.00009129458,0.00021500462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095986563,0.00018009917,0.0004829632,0.000024372992,0.0006675393,0.00024317163,0.00025169915,0.00014588883,0.0003807448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012885423,0.00017711852,0.000096520125,0.00006940767,0.00027593604,0.000389783,0.00007683706,0.00031504902,0.00030584037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034096138,0.00027380986,0.06875778,0.007213497,0.00032462785,0.000022877779,0.022718713,0.000005273786,0.00088910584,0.77395433,0.048058096,0.0777478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010470157,0.000011476022,0.000488475,0.00029276282,0.0000593153,0.0000074897844,0.00004400922,0.0000013463244,0.000009479826,0.0010530683,0.99767965,0.00024819904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23776421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8005949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94962156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001031604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025306595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7673116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243222075","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20411","title":"Great Canadian Gaming Corp. v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>Docket No. S152587; [2016] B.C.J. No. 113; 2016 BCSC 101 (British Columbia Supreme Court, Vancouver, British Columbia, January 25, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Lottery; Columbia university; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Media studies","score_opus":0.008839946253133973,"score_gpt":0.19484774699820023,"score_spread":0.18600780074506626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243222075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7864851,0.14900303,0.000028723913,0.0016055955,0.00741485,0.0054517617,0.009948136,0.00043694823,0.039625864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10992777,0.5542158,0.000992295,0.06717083,0.0029453384,0.00051910186,0.0012519889,0.0005109869,0.26246592],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99456716,0.00017458027,0.0016917539,0.0015476696,0.00029244515,0.0017263981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596715,0.00024855547,0.0006023701,0.0010723079,0.0004679672,0.0016416699],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008351619,0.000492004,0.0021309468,0.00004359252,0.001069385,0.0029352475,0.0005426007,0.00039710468,0.0082636345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019749047,0.00095666014,0.000537489,0.00017223161,0.0005552221,0.0011210246,0.00034224364,0.0005662529,0.0006200173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014992966,0.00012313845,0.048055332,0.0015913045,0.0002197806,0.0010705322,0.00001000561,1.1791094e-7,0.00002592837,0.0000026268233,0.878778,0.07010827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035739983,0.000400491,0.01712582,0.01704456,0.00080356764,0.003714364,0.000026377746,0.000030470992,0.0000018160906,0.00010978743,0.9558771,0.0012916445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98537606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6765573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010241002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008870066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243943677","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19412","title":"Walsh v. Atlantic Lottery Corp. Inc. <i>[2015] N.S.J. No. 56; 2015 NSCA 16 (Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, February 13, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Appeal; Lottery; Law; Political science; History; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02910424056185277,"score_gpt":0.27524024276563464,"score_spread":0.24613600220378187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243943677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63134724,0.33160505,0.000055318043,0.016772736,0.0015938109,0.0015388022,0.00017416623,0.00009386955,0.016818989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8555707,0.099209726,0.00075198687,0.042119842,0.00093102135,0.000017088954,0.0006360185,0.0000981098,0.0006655071],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836665,0.000054149492,0.0007430027,0.00037034007,0.00011203639,0.00035379754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985811,0.000058691632,0.00031964458,0.00054478477,0.00013307027,0.0003626816],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000656872,0.0002937864,0.0010392577,0.000048426387,0.000051911153,0.00003581386,0.00016450057,0.00009814606,0.00018507228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033743636,0.0002579358,0.00018168753,0.000066169356,0.00015360843,0.0002479111,0.00018266281,0.00022520583,0.00049620686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016857019,0.00024299041,0.025796078,0.0051794727,0.00028414465,0.000047411002,0.000067085275,0.000005350251,0.000070646354,0.0015996145,0.96353614,0.003002511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028093362,0.0006819652,0.0021218495,0.0035960183,0.0013028844,0.00066603057,0.000064752014,0.00018459008,0.00008226309,0.00019943975,0.9876855,0.00060537294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008628968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009189751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2323953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014396934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013799594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244012758","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19215","title":"R. v. Miller <i>[2014] B.C.J. No. 2121, 2014 BCSC 1561, Docket: X075613 (British Columbia Supreme Court, April 4, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Miller; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02322293283140335,"score_gpt":0.2536600518538323,"score_spread":0.23043711902242892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244012758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05152747,0.4143629,0.000041384803,0.004110893,0.00423663,0.002058416,0.0001955231,0.0002816176,0.52318513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30434167,0.6457562,0.000602376,0.014270823,0.0041465275,0.00015980226,0.0000807375,0.00012488312,0.030516988],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979257,0.00016839843,0.0006428711,0.0005160022,0.00017549259,0.0005715215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985587,0.000084427564,0.0003173463,0.00029683555,0.000276921,0.00046579665],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019793569,0.00019893247,0.0007748758,0.000017027838,0.00070736767,0.00086449407,0.00036115927,0.0001903485,0.00071098265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019755926,0.00026583494,0.00013317826,0.00008235846,0.00036453895,0.00068742136,0.00012055232,0.000181339,0.0010795116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037628802,0.00003628974,0.0026752127,0.0007158168,0.000043555523,0.000004975186,0.0004631643,0.0000024071799,0.0000018689834,0.0052224044,0.9859044,0.004926141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031940368,0.00003997407,0.00013225892,0.0005017027,0.000086686436,0.000013749356,0.0001836718,0.000011832482,0.0000013376637,0.0017256263,0.9966089,0.0003748609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2695343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29702497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49266815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014830318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029113225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245174989","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18910","title":"In the Matter of the Bankruptcy of Phu Hai Pham[2014) B.C.J. No. 2013, 2014 BCSC 1538, 2014 BC.C. Lexis 1750 (British Columbia Supreme Court (in Bankruptcy &amp; Involvency), July 30, 2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Supreme court; Lexis; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013551845811978859,"score_gpt":0.20254489788669885,"score_spread":0.18899305207472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245174989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82171834,0.08328445,0.00009778634,0.01342315,0.003788165,0.0038249008,0.00028007428,0.000075120784,0.07350801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87603533,0.082056694,0.00025629663,0.034641508,0.0014331846,0.00016682952,0.00009589787,0.00012690222,0.0051873545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764127,0.00009801862,0.0011368885,0.00051491964,0.00016789135,0.00044101992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779546,0.00013768209,0.0010873,0.00080849096,0.00014738081,0.000023663571],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001960187,0.00029011036,0.0008855554,0.000047585192,0.00016853999,0.0003091187,0.0007995281,0.00012486296,0.00177353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007872579,0.00028124076,0.00022294807,0.00015313405,0.00027969552,0.0011085783,0.0002646401,0.000308238,0.001210938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012285671,0.0001518253,0.060733866,0.003539691,0.000033442564,0.00000190926,0.00008582227,0.000036172827,0.000025543839,0.0034755901,0.93030393,0.0015999406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006155332,0.000015402873,0.035496145,0.0016367637,0.00012860504,0.000006813985,0.000016176156,0.0002329607,0.000004487806,0.003299039,0.9581893,0.00035877587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06466921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12328082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068320654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043298794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044495115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246162766","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19113","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Joseph LeClair <i>[2014] O.J. No. 2700, 2014 ON.C. LEXIS 2994 (Ontario Court of Justice, March 19, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Economic Justice; Lexis; Humanities; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0374808489849111,"score_gpt":0.2876950274305874,"score_spread":0.2502141784456763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246162766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11705492,0.20561036,0.0000646287,0.055976547,0.0022922303,0.0031133334,0.0003152005,0.00016408,0.6154087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1503789,0.77945006,0.0019303329,0.03229039,0.0028292183,0.00011115204,0.00011643215,0.000095548814,0.032797962],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986694,0.00017205998,0.00038119536,0.00031654173,0.00013211029,0.00032870332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892753,0.0001963182,0.00023244346,0.00029730008,0.000107184234,0.00023923718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019086725,0.00018983275,0.0005078541,0.0000052178057,0.0005716687,0.00010256307,0.00030141787,0.00017781892,0.0001417043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066618835,0.00013743532,0.00011626326,0.000046223875,0.0006679125,0.00023181699,0.00010779111,0.00027962064,0.0001483893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014129354,0.000043048563,0.009498691,0.0009357672,0.00013056277,0.0000010635506,0.0073439903,0.000009016006,0.0000013722948,0.1668091,0.812812,0.0024013103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022866315,0.00004861016,0.0007911104,0.00017300108,0.0002707096,0.000001903249,0.0006231944,0.0000022264053,0.0000021169933,0.0024102055,0.995258,0.00019026558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021723952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025036935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5826107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014589586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002575281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246623397","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19212","title":"CHC Casinos Canada Ltd. v. Luo <i>[2015] O.J. No. 1, 2015 ONSC 3, Court File No.: CV-13-482139 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 2, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Federal court; Court decision; Supreme court","score_opus":0.020798847694689666,"score_gpt":0.26440094153032484,"score_spread":0.24360209383563516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246623397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12253038,0.19786987,0.000015836069,0.037277758,0.010273493,0.003472245,0.004323694,0.0001377764,0.62409896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40604794,0.33213687,0.006984452,0.032948706,0.009658537,0.00045981532,0.0014414627,0.00031811022,0.21000409],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836695,0.00008266104,0.00058258267,0.00033552386,0.00017711954,0.00045518606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984806,0.00015059457,0.000266796,0.00031476535,0.00041205253,0.00037519133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007469133,0.0002343805,0.00070727576,0.000025040637,0.0006080443,0.00007103498,0.0002262174,0.0001136526,0.00060305867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019135363,0.00021744441,0.00011441079,0.00008720547,0.00039203314,0.00030636374,0.00012238121,0.00018205389,0.00010976784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000863618,0.000030350318,0.00071300083,0.0004166187,0.00006292057,0.0000074112686,0.0012048719,0.000022119888,0.0000012471116,0.003190329,0.99389243,0.0004500451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002835869,0.000044734,0.0007131857,0.0002683838,0.00029445352,0.00001099674,0.0006356196,0.000047684687,0.0000018397578,0.0000415315,0.99737614,0.00028185014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8869086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9821546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41409484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005606067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00207178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88671255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246921850","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19612","title":"Between Stanley Howard Tomchin, Plaintiff, and Her Majesty the Queen and the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, Defendants <i>[2015] F.C.J. No. 378; 2015 FC 402 (Federal Court, Vancouver, British Columbia, March 30, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Plaintiff; Law; Queen (butterfly); Preparedness; Political science; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.028192252856117938,"score_gpt":0.27961806071089784,"score_spread":0.2514258078547799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246921850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62265134,0.3061329,0.000051913627,0.02923695,0.0020636083,0.0036247002,0.001451213,0.00006831289,0.03471907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61639947,0.3748068,0.00025513195,0.0010265164,0.00048510134,0.000054709566,0.00003522587,0.000038831546,0.0068982313],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834085,0.0003106254,0.00053532864,0.00033915593,0.00013747026,0.00033655897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891454,0.00018122407,0.00027339102,0.00022720451,0.00019108641,0.00021257038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024029305,0.0001541405,0.00059401314,0.000011025766,0.0011920602,0.00036658754,0.00016749922,0.00009116135,0.000064449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014717644,0.0001289628,0.00007110078,0.000068710244,0.0012643754,0.00034970138,0.00028409844,0.00013719345,0.0000029761795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008748575,0.00008363187,0.1554581,0.0016268436,0.0005961199,0.0000058446462,0.011698925,0.0000022271513,2.8247464e-7,0.0115602715,0.7891672,0.02971308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008108147,0.000047740825,0.011454626,0.00016372999,0.00017591889,0.000008805649,0.0014726507,0.000027458173,4.4131273e-8,0.0010330254,0.98459303,0.0002121646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036452636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3052815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26882887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005924246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013251857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9699637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247510543","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.15911","title":"Haghdust v. British Columbia Lottery Corp. <i>Docket No. S105520, 2011 BCSC 772 (British Columbia Supreme Court, June 2, 2011)</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Lottery; Political science; Electronic signature; Economics","score_opus":0.028209927362558118,"score_gpt":0.22776491453807696,"score_spread":0.19955498717551884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247510543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26206425,0.04569612,0.0000134118145,0.0006130095,0.003416663,0.0013270826,0.0005580837,0.00023166249,0.68607974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17475612,0.460081,0.0007959578,0.022498433,0.0013780002,0.00007653398,0.00015941811,0.00014175789,0.34011278],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788314,0.00018625622,0.00069805176,0.0005451599,0.00014319435,0.00054420583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875236,0.00008363577,0.00033022914,0.00028667817,0.00023322296,0.0003138771],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001148993,0.00015843553,0.00059748703,0.000011889824,0.0007753809,0.0016381806,0.00049674505,0.00013222356,0.0155718345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010317077,0.00032321378,0.00017903582,0.000042571046,0.0005179639,0.00082166854,0.00013569844,0.00025321532,0.0014340095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072672005,0.00019284182,0.016017888,0.0004860619,0.0001345284,0.00008502147,0.00020527953,1.7503035e-7,0.0000059556637,0.010439403,0.95867276,0.013752816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033613553,0.000045511086,0.008052989,0.0006191235,0.00010583359,0.000055401597,0.000027709062,0.00001295124,9.917453e-7,0.000715432,0.98961556,0.00041237075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3934297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80597866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41438487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010472228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010236961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247762789","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14615","title":"203102 Ontario Ltd. v. Canada <i>[2010] O.J. No. 2055 (May 14, 2010)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.015208141255021458,"score_gpt":0.23464852136471784,"score_spread":0.21944038010969638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247762789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16156603,0.031771604,0.0000049954197,0.029636847,0.017219966,0.0010718887,0.000101003454,0.000074468255,0.7585532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36105606,0.19741544,0.0026852787,0.03962285,0.0059963386,0.00013981688,0.00010646164,0.00010184783,0.39287588],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991468,0.000026386342,0.00025112662,0.00021710077,0.000062298976,0.0002962738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993957,0.000057458725,0.00010278713,0.00020230404,0.00007530226,0.00016639469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004243344,0.000121812125,0.00029452733,0.000009543599,0.000900364,0.00007240261,0.00013545326,0.00007348023,0.00053617114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052588133,0.00010890298,0.00006433845,0.000041434025,0.00022307964,0.00017700132,0.00006271587,0.00022224328,0.000055217602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040960113,0.00003831378,0.008389716,0.00040849377,0.000116290095,0.000008637622,0.0021516907,0.0000050121903,0.000012989137,0.32992238,0.6488574,0.010084941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007629148,0.0000060005395,0.0024356244,0.00004927091,0.000052291896,0.00000334135,0.000043799424,0.0000029326563,0.0000016213949,0.00011345992,0.9970587,0.00015665272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.976364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99951017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3656773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001626315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006070797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6924963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247898333","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161113","title":"<i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp.</i> <i>Case No. CV-08-352327, CV-08-356748, [2012] O.J. No. 1879, 2012 ON.C. LEXIS 3717; 2012 ONSC 2304 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, April 30, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Humanities; Art; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Statistics; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03858182301488459,"score_gpt":0.2729170242922233,"score_spread":0.23433520127733873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247898333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48615554,0.20668763,0.00018907318,0.0014023877,0.009749445,0.0032321338,0.00034675683,0.00027313665,0.2919639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7546938,0.09187115,0.002795151,0.01842861,0.009545951,0.00036788642,0.00023663693,0.00041221175,0.12164858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514055,0.00027911918,0.0017237825,0.0008700785,0.0003861788,0.0016002691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964254,0.00042655552,0.0010524088,0.0008343134,0.00041434923,0.00084700604],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030517743,0.00076874084,0.001930735,0.0001237093,0.0012972751,0.00033260856,0.0006235776,0.00046667623,0.003096593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021792126,0.0007526666,0.00043617218,0.00021999348,0.00072219106,0.0034745033,0.0002724437,0.0007667385,0.0031995187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006600228,0.003209026,0.045251917,0.031361356,0.0020940993,0.0002851196,0.055763304,0.000099060475,0.00085121766,0.15648001,0.66231036,0.04163452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063409,0.00011373074,0.00057237316,0.0015457178,0.0007846008,0.00014226977,0.00027953184,0.0000032370872,0.000024477455,0.00013257295,0.994839,0.0009283873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2982831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5976616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33252868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008752225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010205801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248601765","doi":"10.1089/glre.2009.13210","title":"1397868 Ontario Ltd. v. Nordic Gaming Corp., <i>[2008] O.J. No. 5171</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.01967238829424454,"score_gpt":0.2614517018495865,"score_spread":0.24177931355534196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248601765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08589744,0.022410229,0.000022912362,0.0023539818,0.00058490306,0.00034483944,0.000009255374,0.00007017779,0.88830626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6979052,0.16768244,0.0011044176,0.07425226,0.0013041903,0.000013394767,0.00004508572,0.00004524172,0.057647802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989413,0.000059137114,0.00035821056,0.00026715858,0.0000772393,0.00029698093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993798,0.00006289761,0.0001622028,0.00016719897,0.00007626179,0.00015163215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000680736,0.00014563561,0.00032262318,0.000023169292,0.0003659539,0.00014853948,0.00023439065,0.000055035227,0.00036258143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075045566,0.00014896513,0.000101743055,0.000043787837,0.00012813364,0.00040719195,0.00003235965,0.00017064523,0.00040820203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007783484,0.000046583515,0.00070195936,0.00010024773,0.000031928896,0.000007899259,0.000620747,0.0000036011302,0.000024063678,0.9722019,0.0037188213,0.02253447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014323709,0.000039097406,0.0011156452,0.00027122974,0.000041611427,0.0000042267156,0.000013277692,0.000012784712,0.00000595854,0.0006303042,0.9975324,0.00019018637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006105143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026707834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99381363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018381016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001045675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248841446","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16611","title":"Between Giuseppe Tarascio and Her Majesty, the Queen[2012] F.C.J. No. 127, 2012 FCA 30, 2012 Fed.C.C. LEXIS 134 (Federal Court of Appeal, Toronto, Ontario; January 26, 2012)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Appeal; Lexis; Art; Humanities; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Botany","score_opus":0.02658409602326493,"score_gpt":0.27696495111278485,"score_spread":0.2503808550895199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248841446","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1038089,0.6656404,0.00005777543,0.0057191495,0.002056973,0.0020137571,0.00008934206,0.00010984262,0.22050384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8053827,0.17092519,0.00039596518,0.0029226993,0.0036632796,0.00008275687,0.00002870111,0.00009015853,0.016508533],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978208,0.00020222044,0.00073129276,0.0003510444,0.0001686289,0.00072603906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998576,0.00018635317,0.00047324575,0.00031329502,0.00010356381,0.00034753585],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002065146,0.00031111782,0.000898407,0.000019725132,0.0008679233,0.00019468082,0.00033602185,0.00021746676,0.0008966352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043533,0.0002454228,0.00014370288,0.000056369707,0.00049165223,0.0027769175,0.0001717217,0.00024166459,0.00017878812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090820366,0.00048287484,0.25015202,0.0068921302,0.0010347128,0.00000349508,0.021953968,0.0000043075274,0.000021862745,0.22174306,0.4470388,0.050581932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021308348,0.00006480075,0.010676818,0.0004309099,0.00019133299,0.00000350246,0.00028633297,0.0000011966142,0.000003488776,0.00048411856,0.9873069,0.0003375014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32839006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36322024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70157385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024436883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023567294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249754693","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20115","title":"Kalra v. Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp. <i>[2015] O.J. No. 4153, 2015 ONSC 4983; Court File No.: CV-14-4450-00 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, August 6, 2015)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Federal court; Library science; Computer science; Supreme court; Economics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.019604268381198654,"score_gpt":0.2578478612331971,"score_spread":0.23824359285199842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249754693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5031075,0.14908737,0.00011304235,0.010620558,0.0072352677,0.0040580463,0.0018153359,0.00029163042,0.32367125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7253011,0.14677174,0.0017185305,0.0089288,0.0034432434,0.00022981052,0.00017035838,0.00021328901,0.11322317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763924,0.00010316486,0.0008912306,0.00057194877,0.0001846009,0.0006098114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815464,0.00032127002,0.000518415,0.00034048225,0.0003039303,0.00036127667],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012790544,0.00034911153,0.0010692857,0.000050117178,0.00056360086,0.00019587853,0.00032462034,0.0002222314,0.0025979297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021548693,0.00029000573,0.00013889077,0.00007989891,0.0005732435,0.0009105,0.00016088909,0.00023355593,0.00030139834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012685193,0.00025729794,0.030609412,0.0069036474,0.0003504801,0.000027930666,0.008083155,0.000002439298,0.0002955791,0.017751968,0.92548716,0.0101040825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049544574,0.00010241667,0.0015848291,0.0021090808,0.00027925102,0.000013939297,0.00017276355,0.000004320401,0.000014731559,0.0001279035,0.9946581,0.00043719602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35672948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63155735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2748279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046979517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084565603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250988032","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.15308","title":"Between Clotilde Bérubé, Appellant, and Rational Entertainment Limited, RespondentINDEXED AS: Bérubé v. Rational Entertainment Ltd.Divisional Court File No. 09-DV-1559Ontario Superior Court of JusticeDivisional Court - Ottawa, Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entertainment; Law; Federal court; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.027157987084553525,"score_gpt":0.2608420082777049,"score_spread":0.23368402119315135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250988032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9137692,0.013716751,0.00029703527,0.004454774,0.0018456574,0.0032237268,0.0019578573,0.00009529778,0.060639694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98348784,0.0075255404,0.0015145214,0.0017865757,0.00082931,0.000103139144,0.0006641284,0.000042487278,0.0040464257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971645,0.00017265031,0.0011142903,0.00059763796,0.00047733678,0.0004735958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821717,0.0004305999,0.00053079106,0.00021990942,0.00026478615,0.00033672195],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017170864,0.0003383892,0.00080976106,0.00008208471,0.0007055935,0.00016749543,0.0003210676,0.00018685476,0.0037344596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019528868,0.00032745174,0.00016479474,0.00007936048,0.00043177517,0.0005240172,0.00018532888,0.00026318233,0.00010620366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010311019,0.0015660934,0.40344548,0.0052207517,0.0018561722,0.0000632166,0.034763858,0.000045359324,0.00017977002,0.4501518,0.090277344,0.011399055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010521208,0.00029319228,0.054828204,0.0014797405,0.00036444332,0.000022237555,0.00061835867,0.000063388754,0.000036997288,0.0017532407,0.93890303,0.00058506895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05137284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08416731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84862566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036310643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008089108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251263544","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14913","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario (Native Affairs), <i>S.C.C.A. No. 91, C.S.C.R. no 91, File No.: 33613 (Supreme Court of Canada, July 8, 2010)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016435658769321584,"score_gpt":0.2192227205486977,"score_spread":0.2027870617793761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251263544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07582086,0.008091806,0.000008556136,0.0016127517,0.0043682395,0.0013760836,0.0006947914,0.00004774866,0.90797913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744268,0.009883384,0.0006595184,0.00096221385,0.0011307261,0.000060240196,0.000090197806,0.000042917793,0.012743977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985873,0.00004588775,0.00062373653,0.00027500006,0.0001601461,0.0003079394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841005,0.00019893081,0.0005962477,0.00018654314,0.00046374928,0.00014450871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008515379,0.00017439341,0.0006108366,0.000026483869,0.00043437112,0.000049124617,0.00024650877,0.00012396624,0.00083927164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005007968,0.00017321708,0.00008474952,0.00008870127,0.00024083762,0.0003801074,0.00006099767,0.00023647971,0.000040893254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001268954,0.00046534513,0.01205857,0.01878632,0.0007405639,0.000010501217,0.030590355,0.00009370548,0.0007495512,0.20948206,0.7201751,0.0067210435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015964548,0.000042262578,0.0005496463,0.0008122545,0.000056303204,0.0000011636216,0.00015895185,0.000035064833,0.00009063348,0.00021518079,0.9976583,0.0002205621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9338248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89860594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019585722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010405876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9189436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252216832","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17415","title":"Majewski v. Complex Services Inc. <i>[2013] O.J. No. 396; 2013 ON.C. LEXIS 282; 2013 ONSC 690 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 30, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Download; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.024848904152509753,"score_gpt":0.26179457320145105,"score_spread":0.2369456690489413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252216832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47839227,0.14629456,0.000013751006,0.019079093,0.0028628,0.004439752,0.00028808316,0.000214565,0.34841514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6195319,0.35537907,0.0008273075,0.015066516,0.0015707936,0.00023517651,0.00010584211,0.00009400767,0.0071893726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997619,0.00013466172,0.0009491501,0.0005144489,0.00018734646,0.0005954211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998282,0.00016849951,0.00052658253,0.00039876378,0.00030429373,0.00031981835],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008533968,0.00035595437,0.0011091009,0.000056113407,0.00069761206,0.0002833777,0.00052329793,0.00020852279,0.0023428535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002676237,0.00032647353,0.00015225087,0.000109274,0.00040954154,0.0009936937,0.00015471631,0.00025053366,0.0020693657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051939704,0.0005044398,0.008369663,0.021554207,0.00048408014,0.0000089399755,0.011593643,0.00009957825,0.000106022846,0.108431265,0.8364671,0.012329142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026512053,0.00009211729,0.0011443396,0.00096986705,0.00020596854,0.000003009932,0.0006656903,0.00007877482,0.000005522702,0.0006262713,0.99552643,0.0004168601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.719053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47739336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34122574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015685825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002589991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253012223","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.16412","title":"Bell v. Levy <i>[2011] B.C.J. No. 2018, 2011 BCCA 417; 2011 BC.C. LEXIS 5195 (British Columbia Court of Appeal, October 27, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Lexis; Download; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02812046852513575,"score_gpt":0.2573231408813508,"score_spread":0.22920267235621503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253012223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06837655,0.17050345,0.000023145229,0.0012571136,0.0032280402,0.001027652,0.00030144924,0.00009236751,0.7551902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17858042,0.6459513,0.0009112313,0.011730702,0.0022070846,0.000037704773,0.00010781903,0.000120553734,0.16035323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800766,0.00018050981,0.0007321202,0.0003589971,0.0001542848,0.00056646176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858904,0.00012291012,0.00046158067,0.00031569065,0.00019228742,0.00031852187],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017444176,0.00019412096,0.0006350345,0.000024308096,0.00039430516,0.00022483469,0.0004224689,0.000129404,0.009537881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058051603,0.00026334435,0.00020192901,0.000025100844,0.00044516957,0.0009224743,0.00013271239,0.00020444981,0.0052409917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000148762365,0.00026365393,0.014596975,0.0007451472,0.0001663765,0.0000042107263,0.00034786738,9.478355e-7,0.0000284297,0.11625006,0.85936254,0.008218928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002581963,0.000043381082,0.0023676143,0.00028357416,0.00010986027,0.000008411787,0.000026647453,0.000006846473,0.000008518748,0.00028329538,0.9962897,0.00031395716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05428145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031262297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.594837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008490305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009500482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253019488","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20412","title":"MGM Grand Hotel LLC v. Chiu <i>CV-15-527306; [2016] O.J. No. 721; 2016 ONSC 1071 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, February 10, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Download; Advertising; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.017568862641268588,"score_gpt":0.2517096826205425,"score_spread":0.2341408199792739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253019488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29958668,0.2637519,0.00016118331,0.021941923,0.004664266,0.002918559,0.0006511746,0.00019460756,0.40612972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23400036,0.66646016,0.0011199869,0.0034194824,0.001562444,0.00009158736,0.00003330847,0.00008005089,0.093232624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984101,0.000082678496,0.0005863244,0.00037407686,0.000102175574,0.0004446268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988768,0.00020408469,0.00025679776,0.00031489186,0.00014292274,0.00020448766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077507383,0.00023489675,0.0006862697,0.000036889975,0.00082701753,0.000066284934,0.00022056626,0.00012992695,0.00079696596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097941935,0.00016389934,0.0002077424,0.00007411458,0.0007017751,0.00043570815,0.00011991494,0.00010825371,0.00028951047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023619838,0.0005777603,0.010703969,0.006899722,0.0011811709,0.000027934411,0.013752948,0.000013992607,0.00048600746,0.19635598,0.6446603,0.12510401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051592896,0.00005845183,0.0024317827,0.0010913551,0.00038273903,0.0000058510404,0.00012569346,0.000002807093,0.000010509742,0.0004854416,0.9945845,0.0003049219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027302586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056083906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40270826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001626697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003842851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9791747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253535235","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18712","title":"Souliere v. Casino Niagara2014 CarswellOnt 3908, 2014 OnSC 1915, 239 A.C.W.S. (3d) 266 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, March 25, 2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.024040022461297772,"score_gpt":0.2767443486285625,"score_spread":0.25270432616726474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253535235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74065626,0.1208654,0.00006733064,0.011367427,0.00212597,0.0025456438,0.00015311199,0.00015076742,0.12206811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74270225,0.24270809,0.0028488913,0.0033962673,0.0009473037,0.00010024329,0.00004903138,0.00006596771,0.0071819867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787366,0.00022883897,0.00067552755,0.00048131307,0.0001615148,0.0005791267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867153,0.00027851638,0.00032992146,0.00033301985,0.00014352798,0.00024347949],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014929832,0.0003067823,0.0010007843,0.000027605018,0.0008993831,0.00011079674,0.0003543194,0.00017727971,0.00042547812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017677319,0.00027087587,0.000200254,0.000056454508,0.00073511014,0.00030082688,0.0001762721,0.00026521832,0.00019989895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111848436,0.0005302902,0.13135485,0.018239468,0.0015196076,0.000026329262,0.077483125,0.00018729166,0.00015233037,0.41432616,0.28602886,0.07003984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029832002,0.00005066671,0.005254268,0.00033894897,0.00049458945,0.000005947213,0.00070508977,0.000044160253,0.000008233322,0.00017300164,0.9922429,0.00038391005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11646283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24372004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.706214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003687102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013307689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253588455","doi":"10.1089/glre.2016.20311","title":"Lalani v. Reeves <i>Case File No. 07-CV-338183CP; [2016] O.J. No. 397; 2016 ONSC 424 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 26, 2016)</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01707181484242867,"score_gpt":0.25230569093579847,"score_spread":0.2352338760933698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253588455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12838021,0.17232858,0.000110377274,0.007115419,0.00600565,0.0035215851,0.0022720008,0.00039709487,0.6798691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34343773,0.48955706,0.0016769639,0.0070994115,0.0048105167,0.00027322824,0.00007096657,0.0001977205,0.1528764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980123,0.00012148458,0.0007877603,0.0004548469,0.00012012693,0.0005034725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834687,0.0003699701,0.00041517612,0.0003490405,0.00025534822,0.00026358693],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010824347,0.0002674068,0.0008325754,0.000037083413,0.0005555055,0.00011118855,0.0003015087,0.0001824665,0.0018330702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036209112,0.0001992366,0.00016319891,0.00007491515,0.00045232422,0.0007948457,0.00011939203,0.00014182662,0.0016728835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009322743,0.00020987913,0.0026398073,0.008256257,0.00029782514,0.00012308455,0.004660602,8.792843e-7,0.00042528927,0.040821426,0.91630244,0.026169296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030531158,0.000078106685,0.00012401585,0.002815434,0.00021788136,0.000038346683,0.00017723125,0.000002712155,0.000022381688,0.000292704,0.9955865,0.00033938332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10610657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07280598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5269927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017210786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066902576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253904827","doi":"10.1089/glre.2012.161114","title":"<i>Moreira v. Ontario Lottery &amp; Gaming Corp.</i> <i>Case No. CV-08-352327, CV-08-356748, [2012] O.J. No. 2359, 2012 ON.C. Lexis 4239; 2012 ONSC 2903 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, May 29, 2012)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Lexis; Download; Humanities; Political science; Art; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Statistics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04049825371803708,"score_gpt":0.2792281938176612,"score_spread":0.2387299400996241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253904827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4645199,0.21962701,0.00020921748,0.00197605,0.0108025465,0.003547475,0.00040562096,0.00027533335,0.29863685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7595897,0.094798036,0.0031063294,0.015923359,0.009015357,0.00036184504,0.00025739518,0.00038720315,0.11656078],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951294,0.00029795757,0.0017078246,0.00086513686,0.00038312114,0.0016165456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964524,0.0004346069,0.0010351675,0.000813318,0.00040529412,0.00085919816],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031273623,0.0007709658,0.001903605,0.00012988964,0.0012838008,0.0003288722,0.00060650165,0.00046396864,0.002636506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018505432,0.00075045833,0.0004425577,0.00022429677,0.00071958906,0.0035807735,0.00025825118,0.0007798604,0.0025982226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072902604,0.0030178882,0.071023725,0.029755164,0.0019935616,0.0002887615,0.04774647,0.00007773395,0.0006980454,0.16495407,0.6410342,0.038681388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006196176,0.000104412764,0.0006725898,0.0017482386,0.000779894,0.00018225079,0.00026778757,0.0000029460812,0.00002162997,0.00011397804,0.9945603,0.0009263646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31411666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6853956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37127894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009152376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009962444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254099115","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.17611","title":"Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba, Ltd.Case No. CI 09-01-61504 and CI 09-01-61489, [2013] M.J. No. 81; 2013 MBQB 67; 2013 MB.C.Lexis 81 (Manitoba Court of Queen s Bench, Winnipeg Centre, March 15, 2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); General partnership; Charter; Library science; Political science; Geography; Humanities; Art; Archaeology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02751448436436627,"score_gpt":0.2525301976058204,"score_spread":0.22501571324145414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254099115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74947625,0.17393646,0.000014888658,0.014381919,0.002229204,0.0058945534,0.001262763,0.00016927403,0.05263469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.739571,0.25388914,0.0003606961,0.0017655425,0.001511948,0.00013271999,0.00016422172,0.00010746962,0.002497301],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962679,0.0003246109,0.0014309393,0.00074755185,0.00028984636,0.0009391424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967134,0.00034258753,0.0010351797,0.0005652672,0.0007017388,0.0006418411],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001376083,0.00052354013,0.0014410283,0.00012236458,0.0006420434,0.00028344546,0.00049802806,0.00032875972,0.00091030286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021471576,0.0005019998,0.00020779028,0.00026161794,0.0008827969,0.0008705262,0.00021658711,0.00034811214,0.0004418003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011930959,0.0005981784,0.057564866,0.01648078,0.0008779606,0.00015171507,0.0038271027,0.00004132804,0.000073588395,0.03238487,0.8611496,0.026730685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063472457,0.00012668807,0.0011530687,0.0014478482,0.00029909593,0.0000398329,0.0015429679,0.00013937349,0.00002007853,0.0007592972,0.9931088,0.00072820194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68301445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7243703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1319592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015007734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003674814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254174589","doi":"10.1089/glre.2010.14712","title":"Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. Ontario, <i>[2010] O.J. No. 2360 (Can.)</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Political science; Volume (thermodynamics); Humanities; Library science; Media studies; Law; Art; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics","score_opus":0.03524059886939603,"score_gpt":0.25720224268264835,"score_spread":0.2219616438132523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254174589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.869606,0.00980747,0.00000286062,0.007613035,0.0017646615,0.0007389171,0.00001971742,0.00006165163,0.11038566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399985,0.05212684,0.0019255765,0.0018769781,0.0004846469,0.00003758734,0.00001540411,0.000018936626,0.0035154992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923134,0.00002731742,0.00029129707,0.00018480883,0.000060268634,0.00020494129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943626,0.000088573994,0.00019801762,0.00011343896,0.00008594696,0.000077741905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055549096,0.000111211324,0.0003294104,0.000010318063,0.0005913707,0.00004939169,0.00013899448,0.00008089031,0.00017816482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018335707,0.000099345874,0.00007546321,0.000041787156,0.00026581972,0.00021327956,0.000063318636,0.00017305225,0.00003525149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018958752,0.00018976485,0.066331826,0.00409783,0.00038817764,0.0000024347696,0.06900094,0.000017907947,0.0005913083,0.80081993,0.011637712,0.046903197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012284218,0.000013985944,0.004090039,0.00020481851,0.00006237264,9.16932e-7,0.0001882752,0.000008062381,0.00003282864,0.00034725873,0.99476004,0.00016856045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15783559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7404369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98312235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011166032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047376572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8477725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256483765","doi":"10.1089/glre.2013.171012","title":"Marina District Development Co. (c.o.b. Borgata Hotel Casino &amp; Spa) v. Canada <i>Case No. [2013] F.C.J. No. 847; 2103 Fed.C.C. LEXIS 858; 2013 F.C. 800; (Federal Court, Toronto, Ontario, July 18, 2013)</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lexis; Download; Advertising; Business; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02357041584856334,"score_gpt":0.252725631977032,"score_spread":0.22915521612846868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256483765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24886087,0.13971369,0.00006891557,0.007459496,0.0061133383,0.005318692,0.00044137228,0.000272594,0.59175104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6458347,0.2201364,0.003585401,0.018279353,0.0034969458,0.0006200338,0.0005024385,0.00024471636,0.1073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969525,0.0001380502,0.0010209238,0.00069857144,0.0002615488,0.00092840893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979358,0.0001355027,0.0005125994,0.00043507537,0.00035625327,0.0006247726],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083356147,0.0004834271,0.0010063732,0.000023358307,0.0016072177,0.0006553776,0.00044537726,0.0002090747,0.0022617113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102827194,0.0004692712,0.00012385406,0.00008042711,0.00023792042,0.0011665389,0.00017569364,0.00029517553,0.0010104573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015628488,0.000077673154,0.004060913,0.0013290712,0.00015066628,0.00005899686,0.0012160008,0.0000030987808,0.0000024260228,0.0016329448,0.9832678,0.008184818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028683429,0.000032878972,0.0009620487,0.00035221654,0.000069016794,0.00007755465,0.00015897412,0.0000067285796,0.000003841621,0.00006462779,0.9973371,0.0006481961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99930304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48445103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018992664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024943037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256694958","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.181010","title":"Szecsodi v. MGM Resorts International <i>Court File No. CV-11-9457-00CL, [2014) O.J. No. 946, 2014 ONSC 1323, 2014 CarswellOnt 2465 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Commercial List, March 3, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01533223290551432,"score_gpt":0.26300772418413465,"score_spread":0.24767549127862032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256694958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10894745,0.06210503,0.0003101963,0.01779585,0.016143955,0.004245342,0.0023880294,0.00031537702,0.78774875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6303987,0.27661335,0.0033863767,0.018497115,0.015628284,0.00041232677,0.0012201759,0.00029624486,0.05354743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970962,0.0002515599,0.0010914311,0.0006385024,0.00029873612,0.0006235779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977678,0.00038285693,0.00060334266,0.0004608837,0.00046211798,0.00032297123],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002354358,0.00036586725,0.0011063232,0.000073479176,0.00070921105,0.00026050874,0.00067920325,0.00025664916,0.0036637224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003579922,0.00036422347,0.00024831455,0.0000665238,0.0005324706,0.0007003817,0.00023695668,0.00033578216,0.0010075473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003846524,0.00011065491,0.007067214,0.0017739183,0.00009299565,0.0000040433115,0.001107515,0.0000114766135,0.000019402622,0.018465392,0.9688971,0.0024117916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038865145,0.00007922993,0.0013513849,0.00069022505,0.00021824989,0.000008399697,0.00009316819,0.00008286484,0.0000071744903,0.00025004792,0.996407,0.00042361813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23013522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28905722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7342014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029664102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042950414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256695152","doi":"10.1089/glre.2014.18812","title":"Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba Ltd. <i>[2014] M.J. No. 171, 2014 MBCA 61, 2014 MB.C. Lexis 172 (Manitoba Court of Appeal, June 13, 2014)</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Lexis; General partnership; Political science; Download; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03139974770948781,"score_gpt":0.2670107917707297,"score_spread":0.23561104406124192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256695152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46596673,0.2894437,0.000095419055,0.021549996,0.005550888,0.005850295,0.0009851928,0.00040106426,0.2101567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6139288,0.37599918,0.0009204493,0.0042857993,0.0014945529,0.00010978597,0.00017629043,0.00009519318,0.0029899306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710214,0.00036346473,0.001038584,0.0005603298,0.00023367886,0.00070180185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752086,0.00038375336,0.00092554465,0.00047657953,0.00036359896,0.00032967594],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018970211,0.00041627017,0.0013483363,0.00004727096,0.0007314711,0.00010759844,0.0005216322,0.00021086232,0.00026774497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028375143,0.000374735,0.00027339355,0.000108141205,0.0011597354,0.00034576972,0.00018381377,0.00024784566,0.00031111442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005090076,0.00020513775,0.035185613,0.0042675906,0.00049326516,0.0000031662812,0.0026467093,0.000037336195,0.000075043055,0.04866825,0.89872736,0.009639641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044796325,0.00007362555,0.002112575,0.0005827359,0.00031224734,0.0000021202013,0.00085417024,0.0000482878,0.000042383755,0.0002586616,0.9947827,0.00048254072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10339971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58611774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48271805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017687744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013527591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}