{"meta":{"query_hash":"7fa3dd32c312","filters":{"venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement"},"cohort_total":52,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":52,"exported":52,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7fa3dd32c312","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Gateways+International+Journal+of+Community+Research+and+Engagement"},"results":[{"id":"W1964362202","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v6i1.3257","title":"Community-based research decision-making: Experiences and factors affecting participation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Corporate governance; Public relations; Public participation; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.8846643334021607,"score_gpt":0.7378253477347129,"score_spread":0.1468389856674478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964362202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98076344,0.000918283,0.002557815,0.004300238,0.00006929066,0.0002576231,0.000043674943,0.000039663315,0.011049941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99631065,0.0004749565,0.00087923167,0.00041899638,0.00002375102,0.00012083027,0.00003461634,0.000021791231,0.0017152012],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93806094,0.05020611,0.0014066437,0.0018791271,0.0035543942,0.004892795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93583,0.044194546,0.0041691363,0.0021976992,0.0040248465,0.009583807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03647273,0.0006332292,0.0008987071,0.0031485911,0.01977159,0.0084072435,0.003227667,0.003932642,0.0032899994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06270215,0.0008501901,0.0006972818,0.0024802715,0.020152926,0.008369449,0.016057072,0.004702383,0.00044295212],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003990207,0.00007287538,0.0028367895,0.00006597154,0.0000051242437,0.0009995521,0.98734206,0.000052341802,0.0001755092,0.002191872,0.0004320753,0.005785924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010341831,0.0000655599,0.0012820624,0.00011845118,0.000004466682,0.00042085318,0.9852068,0.00018448838,0.00013636793,0.0012406252,0.011292983,0.000037088077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01572433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017440932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96352726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004961228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007244339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1928885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975266931","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v3i0.1039","title":"Participatory action research approaches and methods","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Energy Training","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Action (physics); Citizen journalism; Action research; Section (typography); Process (computing); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Anthropology; Pedagogy; World Wide Web; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9619735185795929,"score_gpt":0.7695658100278313,"score_spread":0.1924077085517616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975266931","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036827922,0.009666877,0.7957537,0.017124198,0.0027926785,0.039887007,0.0010524368,0.00047329583,0.12956704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035459854,0.008784755,0.857047,0.0030387747,0.00034236754,0.07431134,0.00042159588,0.00019775673,0.020396631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.77656794,0.19466536,0.005531399,0.0077650924,0.013785152,0.0016851219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90879345,0.07241848,0.0022915218,0.010290103,0.0049920203,0.0012143492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10556317,0.002274035,0.002103576,0.0062549906,0.007239855,0.013021134,0.005838701,0.0048734793,0.017145103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057957117,0.002023136,0.001760728,0.009209122,0.01770693,0.007934147,0.012782272,0.007862567,0.004987504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006739818,0.0003277422,0.00070258346,0.0055425516,0.000119570825,0.00019918106,0.06358764,0.0017945411,0.0007185507,0.6373622,0.027118124,0.26245984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013863483,0.00028440758,0.00061132864,0.00426081,0.000049295762,0.0003404669,0.026895242,0.0013047275,0.0009480089,0.3191832,0.6458658,0.000118086915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019493372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00451831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10556317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00593958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016605765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5582781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977156883","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3395","title":"Engaging evaluation research: Reflecting on the process of sexual assault/domestic violence protocol evaluation research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Scholarship; Sociology; Sexual assault; Theme (computing); Community engagement; Domestic violence; Protocol (science); Engaged scholarship; Public relations; Community-based participatory research; Psychology; Participatory action research; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.8815832168568917,"score_gpt":0.7376941228375049,"score_spread":0.14388909401938677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977156883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41387278,0.0034210419,0.33062202,0.09829492,0.0015604511,0.019543448,0.00025792565,0.00088670204,0.13154079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8261065,0.0016991217,0.14556432,0.005333341,0.00023794935,0.011130272,0.00012506435,0.0004246285,0.00937891],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.41734225,0.54719996,0.010496218,0.004766799,0.015317305,0.0048774723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5949866,0.33969396,0.0090726,0.020021643,0.025156789,0.011068427],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.35043517,0.0010006265,0.0013105733,0.003682723,0.017646851,0.016871642,0.0046696747,0.0062513254,0.0043317243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39710388,0.001241921,0.0011683305,0.0027941894,0.029147003,0.014474743,0.023498695,0.010755615,0.0013028347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106725616,0.00026762736,0.0017126665,0.00059026363,0.000027785285,0.0007620141,0.895867,0.00056251744,0.0013747272,0.03869783,0.00457188,0.055459015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081277474,0.00060547906,0.0014823243,0.0022196877,0.000047701295,0.00081436965,0.80025417,0.001764562,0.0028220823,0.053148806,0.1365808,0.00017882914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026381952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003365672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64956486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010552167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026718942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8010291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984275600","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v6i1.2822","title":"Building equitable community-academic research collaborations: Learning together through tensions and contradictions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"General partnership; Ambivalence; Reflexivity; Public relations; Alliance; Focus group; Sociology; Stakeholder; Process (computing); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.4090382142354676,"score_gpt":0.5037369855164683,"score_spread":0.09469877128100068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984275600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82590765,0.003244065,0.10519877,0.017397454,0.00037088015,0.00093506795,0.00006484155,0.00030486434,0.046576437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838753,0.0004018977,0.013583136,0.0005304759,0.0000393958,0.00031449943,0.000023603905,0.00004895075,0.001182797],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.81997883,0.15526411,0.0036929566,0.005859565,0.010313045,0.0048914584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8864355,0.08409079,0.008624734,0.008713261,0.0060741296,0.0060616503],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11609147,0.0008283515,0.0012596984,0.005743062,0.019258656,0.027432702,0.0044037555,0.003636576,0.0021649306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12127456,0.0014237724,0.00096900243,0.003712588,0.046148498,0.02320785,0.03932465,0.0055333935,0.00046751116],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032914715,0.000060983235,0.0033566048,0.0001686382,0.00003859753,0.0004946553,0.94125396,0.00016226983,0.00051507464,0.039712302,0.00047765445,0.013726282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034499557,0.000101019155,0.0015779331,0.00036948576,0.000035083307,0.00069084216,0.89054793,0.000810783,0.00056772307,0.07123948,0.033967953,0.000057345464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014615406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017137865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99559623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006543833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011460173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6139577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984840671","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3393","title":"The Article Idea Chart: A participatory action research tool to aid involvement in dissemination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Stakeholder; Action research; Process (computing); Public relations; Action (physics); Community-based participatory research; Dissemination; Chart; Knowledge management; Political science; Engineering ethics; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.5418725648488457,"score_gpt":0.6088463977587408,"score_spread":0.06697383290989511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984840671","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026789391,0.0007789832,0.7830319,0.02016774,0.004507139,0.08454733,0.005400743,0.0068066223,0.067970246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043036163,0.0005036226,0.86238635,0.0013821088,0.00021477988,0.07670661,0.0010339579,0.0006665501,0.014069874],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.85549104,0.12506711,0.0070839813,0.0028116861,0.008241425,0.0013047596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.722638,0.22758,0.009743576,0.013896882,0.020963702,0.0051778816],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.109413914,0.0014463464,0.0011294263,0.007263445,0.003676367,0.008384338,0.0026355016,0.0033785417,0.02126711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16737965,0.0011281795,0.0011036703,0.0063802926,0.0056865322,0.008239931,0.00855528,0.004556604,0.004116342],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011278456,0.0007862343,0.0027518126,0.007749193,0.000102736856,0.00066014566,0.13546544,0.0020188536,0.006856686,0.10202811,0.16156179,0.57889116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008149279,0.00074393186,0.0020784743,0.0043392205,0.000113033304,0.0002982388,0.022039318,0.0046848617,0.005596475,0.053435855,0.90554124,0.0003145432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008311781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021248348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8905861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037191708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018522684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57864296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991169346","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3400","title":"Engaging Canadian youth in conversations: Using knowledge exchange in school-based health promotion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Youth Development and Social Support","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Health promotion; Psychological intervention; Overweight; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Youth participation; Positive Youth Development; Focus group; Gerontology; Medicine; Medical education; Obesity; Public relations; Developmental psychology; Public health; Political science; Nursing; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.39253351072380827,"score_gpt":0.47544127518887536,"score_spread":0.08290776446506709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991169346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80843204,0.0055106636,0.019688258,0.022506777,0.00057279214,0.0022450564,0.00038025412,0.00045640764,0.14020768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722286,0.0027851013,0.017280566,0.0014997195,0.00005525007,0.00074464147,0.00014441441,0.0000715558,0.0051900716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97823024,0.015627913,0.0005123792,0.0008466191,0.0021383543,0.0026444208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809879,0.010899188,0.0012222623,0.00064611126,0.0018700905,0.004374535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021986678,0.0009696027,0.00070302846,0.0041362694,0.024432583,0.011454534,0.0031858722,0.0022414897,0.004829577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02419351,0.0006867439,0.0007321712,0.0033675823,0.009999153,0.006121786,0.018930905,0.0033541531,0.00048464575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094293515,0.0003035573,0.009539897,0.0004367754,0.000028488665,0.00089746603,0.90418255,0.00015573707,0.00063914177,0.0030584405,0.0037961185,0.07686743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005670939,0.00019895604,0.011813606,0.001277415,0.000058595368,0.0003852599,0.90015495,0.00060833624,0.0004998192,0.0033637513,0.08146249,0.000120126264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60293055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70614094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39706945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030760093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06768404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7988157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994881547","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3390","title":"Access to health services in Western Newfoundland, Canada: Issues, barriers and recommendations emerging from a community-engaged research project","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Global Health Workforce Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Newfoundland and Labrador; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Telehealth; General partnership; Government (linguistics); Rural area; Business; Health care; Medicine; Public relations; Nursing; Political science; Telemedicine","score_opus":0.29864917563849164,"score_gpt":0.5668298150896817,"score_spread":0.26818063945119003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994881547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89022785,0.007725221,0.00047937586,0.075342655,0.0001465551,0.00060533173,0.0009860437,0.000044579505,0.024442328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97156334,0.009343988,0.0019213987,0.009323458,0.000031693708,0.0004538358,0.00049186585,0.000027240354,0.0068432074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99235266,0.0016729349,0.00041785417,0.0005290281,0.0015669495,0.0034605518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98062164,0.0048410674,0.0014570439,0.0004197447,0.0062864,0.0063741743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073005003,0.00041617497,0.0005951801,0.0019305695,0.019221403,0.0082581295,0.0028454699,0.0010771982,0.002807848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012023692,0.0005165273,0.00039979676,0.005792089,0.0059058038,0.0029541,0.0049714805,0.0028068465,0.00019631475],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018397266,0.0008496335,0.41393444,0.0027932234,0.00014043285,0.0023067135,0.3682751,0.00042486313,0.0013617165,0.005579267,0.03176749,0.17238317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022839124,0.0001276766,0.30948052,0.0015738863,0.00006387895,0.0001737417,0.656857,0.00030050235,0.0002641201,0.00031006028,0.03073673,0.00008906805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99551815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99836046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09331282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09331282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2749532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6770351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999200618","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v1i0.509","title":"Government Support and Infrastructure: Realizing the value of collaborative work","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Government (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Public relations; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Work (physics); Knowledge management; Business; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.612342354023746,"score_gpt":0.6423381165050858,"score_spread":0.029995762481339727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999200618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11041805,0.004883733,0.09148877,0.32503927,0.00079637056,0.0003354308,0.00006250429,0.00030190774,0.466674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980393,0.001274094,0.010555822,0.0039455285,0.0002585253,0.00018768644,0.000018189312,0.000035663074,0.003331567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9486434,0.0365771,0.0012670428,0.0023197716,0.006395927,0.004796762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8987399,0.07224386,0.006660545,0.011607319,0.0042104167,0.006537897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039722443,0.00046922493,0.00061484013,0.0030648094,0.008844253,0.019779006,0.0028543347,0.00890328,0.006387083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07083763,0.0006796411,0.00080386107,0.0021784513,0.05044933,0.025442591,0.03303879,0.0055998387,0.0009046411],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024409912,0.00005026303,0.0013212988,0.000116094794,0.00001577144,0.00016829562,0.010070512,0.0004817381,0.00016322118,0.9513503,0.002772369,0.033465758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005688271,0.000081933285,0.0010694627,0.0005229467,0.000017327742,0.00013133984,0.010002301,0.00091173785,0.0003963883,0.89601547,0.090767145,0.000027054699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028539086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026250978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039722443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084716985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024266802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21007484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027027889","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3389","title":"University and community partnerships in South Sulawesi, Indonesia: Enhancing community capacity and promoting democratic governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Public Administration in Developing Nations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Mindset; Islam; General partnership; Political science; Public relations; Capacity building; Population; Corporate governance; Civil society; Sociology; Economic growth; Management; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.24505143869303814,"score_gpt":0.39258411427266,"score_spread":0.14753267557962185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027027889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89184684,0.0024972726,0.0024621848,0.018687773,0.00021354397,0.0002461139,0.000028641485,0.00006607553,0.08395144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920758,0.0007081153,0.00094098854,0.0007203864,0.000017174149,0.000061033043,0.00001120168,0.000008539263,0.0054568537],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794763,0.0011460464,0.000047030313,0.00010089101,0.00015615877,0.0006023044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963491,0.0003506494,0.00030275487,0.00007015413,0.00014170754,0.0027856342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002423036,0.0001986261,0.0001724061,0.0004414391,0.008797052,0.00679099,0.0008700453,0.0014115497,0.0067141303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024950372,0.00021204988,0.0001951141,0.00063697115,0.0026568917,0.0036417523,0.009711919,0.0016253825,0.0006625462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003449336,0.005612428,0.11259378,0.0012839496,0.00007044006,0.009978872,0.25931993,0.0014703312,0.0061345887,0.10861359,0.029228399,0.46534878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010439623,0.0007628608,0.0909337,0.000886416,0.00005886704,0.0027269938,0.59633255,0.0033866405,0.003075093,0.028392963,0.27324432,0.00009520082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004995321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013365854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008797052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025200718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012126034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022460997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027883192","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v4i0.1758","title":"It’s the Basement Stories, not the Belt: Lessons from a community-university knowledge mobilisation collaboration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Panacea (medicine); General partnership; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.4249726496933522,"score_gpt":0.45371061435133536,"score_spread":0.028737964657983173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027883192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.654536,0.0036486005,0.009265635,0.12498624,0.001507568,0.00042089957,0.00019492718,0.00022422257,0.20521584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97194946,0.0016607498,0.0022316023,0.0049227863,0.00016282863,0.0002069728,0.0000726281,0.00019464538,0.018598389],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97290796,0.021995913,0.00031432483,0.000986684,0.0014057866,0.0023893197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97905993,0.012474307,0.00096152315,0.0010300935,0.0012270848,0.005247071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01458985,0.00094149576,0.0008734597,0.0020284255,0.057846125,0.02276648,0.0040589347,0.007909944,0.0077743316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0269638,0.0009265565,0.0006759092,0.002300466,0.044294383,0.029376479,0.029713854,0.012089953,0.0012533332],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015624835,0.000046312925,0.0004933774,0.000052090934,0.0000040593054,0.0012692714,0.9733281,0.000039104754,0.000058099173,0.01652612,0.0044052107,0.0037626692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008943983,0.000024095843,0.00020834876,0.000104835795,0.0000031367242,0.00042576212,0.93967235,0.000059617203,0.00007636479,0.0052577485,0.054144222,0.000014584487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017672205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03340247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057846125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009698716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009188644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077159405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029108715","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v6i1.3219","title":"Needs and readiness assessments: Tools for promoting community-university engagement with Aboriginal communities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Community-based participatory research; Community engagement; Participatory action research; General partnership; Needs assessment; Public relations; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Medical education; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.345438752262245,"score_gpt":0.5294459146944093,"score_spread":0.18400716243216425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029108715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50870615,0.0013869364,0.26098165,0.026202459,0.000639438,0.033651024,0.0041893697,0.006721462,0.15752155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35907063,0.0008465736,0.6058981,0.00074550573,0.00005050609,0.023651805,0.001018678,0.00018511256,0.008533139],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717075,0.021468924,0.0022924936,0.00063623046,0.0028835295,0.0010112611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94602275,0.034629017,0.0043962845,0.0029878647,0.008174948,0.0037891043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04798346,0.0011809269,0.0007423098,0.009821138,0.00496771,0.005647955,0.0019093143,0.0014121897,0.0074239094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08554266,0.0008411317,0.0008992057,0.0038073072,0.0021404629,0.0068901633,0.010548732,0.0025868595,0.0016525807],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026259,0.0015277927,0.036464795,0.002266013,0.000086640335,0.00047148205,0.21249437,0.0017325638,0.0031861467,0.018326433,0.028192533,0.69498867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003475043,0.0021146291,0.15707551,0.007122503,0.00028254418,0.001115788,0.4594012,0.015590333,0.010175361,0.090841815,0.25495103,0.0009817587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008782989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0252039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04798346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054735765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016909689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2537638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057471842","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v3i0.1328","title":"A framework for entry: PAR values and engagement strategies in community research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Community Based Research","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Community engagement; Community-based participatory research; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Action research; Action (physics); Diversity (politics); Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.4635515733552064,"score_gpt":0.6045201911721675,"score_spread":0.14096861781696107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057471842","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016107623,0.0046948344,0.7088219,0.08932235,0.0008255938,0.0035094144,0.00011143358,0.00038093695,0.17622598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.527309,0.002503449,0.4447387,0.0052839424,0.00026489698,0.008755158,0.0001065113,0.00019620248,0.010842042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7627439,0.21868241,0.0036517042,0.004329448,0.007062917,0.0035295815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93216324,0.052158866,0.002648092,0.0047328947,0.004415884,0.0038810042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14023454,0.0023761843,0.0020165213,0.0060224286,0.021137254,0.03188241,0.006677263,0.01307212,0.0032791407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04989215,0.0016272306,0.0019772048,0.0051838695,0.111493774,0.037271626,0.023675788,0.01573734,0.00095017033],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013463836,0.00003508119,0.00021160135,0.00022147121,0.0000070078786,0.00022346362,0.0955887,0.00026573936,0.0001087411,0.89379364,0.0009643033,0.008566885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053294185,0.00012582731,0.00023369383,0.0010478252,0.000018669984,0.0005335559,0.07623211,0.0017631248,0.00028442263,0.8238685,0.09577799,0.000060897546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052045807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070826896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14023454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018212678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02176013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74164003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065017426","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3394","title":"Using simulation to educate police about mental illness: A collaborative initiative","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental illness; Mental health; General partnership; Psychology; Perception; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.3559135457385248,"score_gpt":0.5513783477894265,"score_spread":0.19546480205090172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065017426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9593534,0.00046999304,0.0126966275,0.004664013,0.00020569378,0.0036851882,0.00011294827,0.0003089202,0.018503295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9185068,0.0019579201,0.06979336,0.0009072414,0.00010046365,0.0024430486,0.00033098814,0.000049417016,0.005910586],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992831,0.004901814,0.00024034218,0.0003687085,0.00095471274,0.0007033413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842621,0.0066934596,0.00081489503,0.001342256,0.0020817746,0.00480555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008719227,0.0008338184,0.00040465812,0.001173399,0.004050343,0.0025357371,0.002738697,0.0012527097,0.002420809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02231387,0.0004885158,0.0007752983,0.0006365621,0.001900684,0.0016983374,0.0075306334,0.0015266503,0.00038345112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019633933,0.050882842,0.05313373,0.0012753912,0.0002976064,0.0020001635,0.14448689,0.010192135,0.009743525,0.0036504748,0.020108618,0.7022652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036879873,0.042610865,0.12243345,0.0024105045,0.0011142776,0.0028600672,0.4201963,0.045473743,0.023764318,0.0115552815,0.32313922,0.000754074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036829457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080129474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036829457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040810187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019650916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07323021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067029069","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3397","title":"The Farm to Fork project: Community-engaged scholarship from community partners' perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Indigenous and Place-Based Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Scholarship; Fork (system call); Engaged scholarship; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Community engagement; Community organization; Sustainability; Sustainable community; Sociology; Political science; Business; Sustainable development; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.31262712583614083,"score_gpt":0.5057443712480044,"score_spread":0.1931172454118636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067029069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41640636,0.006150384,0.02389309,0.17948553,0.0019194745,0.0012873765,0.00020712963,0.00022728997,0.37042335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96595556,0.0022761333,0.0060406597,0.0044112634,0.00016095718,0.00047575016,0.0000686376,0.00007460254,0.020536464],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97334665,0.019638509,0.0003288828,0.0006241805,0.0028568206,0.003204975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827389,0.00617154,0.0005866226,0.0007459926,0.0015299317,0.008227083],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021686181,0.000308792,0.00036585654,0.0017324556,0.021311268,0.015923636,0.0033051246,0.005712309,0.0071857823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018429324,0.00031044826,0.0003294054,0.002247817,0.017442992,0.00922278,0.027284008,0.004326054,0.0006854996],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006639092,0.0005944383,0.0064483318,0.00057671336,0.00002164426,0.0037211936,0.62562895,0.00052861817,0.00066799513,0.23782031,0.037774097,0.08615132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032410106,0.00016949158,0.0017561463,0.00048718913,0.000008252845,0.0010584006,0.6568411,0.0005098988,0.00024524127,0.029018693,0.3098432,0.000029964158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008818682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026187599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9786887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057342523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03083574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11468887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067149601","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v4i0.1780","title":"Collaboration, Participation and Technology: The San Joaquin Valley Cumulative Health Impacts Project","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Environmental justice; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Sociology; Public participation; Community design; Constructive; Interdependence; Participatory GIS; Community-based participatory research; Knowledge management; Political science; Process (computing); Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.4819062346268573,"score_gpt":0.5812845814256687,"score_spread":0.09937834679881147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067149601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9241377,0.00056997564,0.0030842077,0.018763011,0.00012749339,0.0011463506,0.000693082,0.0000687433,0.05140944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97663975,0.000477581,0.00718597,0.0009984873,0.000034215234,0.0017176223,0.0003791119,0.000025448582,0.0125418855],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921927,0.005472564,0.00007639969,0.0004420749,0.00086982787,0.0009465017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940818,0.0022965318,0.0002371076,0.00025619552,0.00043678813,0.0026915374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010335071,0.00023385785,0.00016548432,0.0005576709,0.0076381965,0.0029471237,0.0010882859,0.0013303454,0.002692518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005652726,0.0002027676,0.00014096331,0.00070942834,0.0044483775,0.001016274,0.0072633103,0.00127653,0.00023982722],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096536195,0.0069907056,0.0854726,0.000550729,0.00010303775,0.0020836364,0.35828075,0.0030393053,0.004070765,0.044780202,0.0915434,0.40211955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009629231,0.0030145836,0.15049386,0.00048449784,0.00009708156,0.0005762255,0.41726163,0.0022449375,0.0031279982,0.015416561,0.40622717,0.0000925241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051284365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15018328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051284365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004916234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017141704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101971745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081344121","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3486","title":"Breathing life into theory: Illustrations of community-based research – Hallmarks, functions and phases","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Community Based Research","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Sociology; Democracy; Academic community; Social research; Management science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.6795361468120121,"score_gpt":0.5615123449395514,"score_spread":0.11802380187246075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081344121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039973307,0.01110123,0.31151026,0.06509213,0.001695057,0.0028272015,0.00014183122,0.0006886085,0.5669704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7019537,0.005890126,0.25826967,0.005776492,0.00027103155,0.0032595906,0.00015271835,0.00040668345,0.024019934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709191,0.02491519,0.00049437373,0.00082677184,0.0018632754,0.0009813366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700665,0.023710184,0.00090723863,0.0023620182,0.0013839412,0.0015701712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028056227,0.0012239324,0.0008111579,0.004610095,0.013841801,0.016330175,0.0034896038,0.0064051985,0.0060616313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031331435,0.0006893487,0.0013270222,0.004575495,0.068728246,0.01766652,0.015524667,0.008694975,0.0012981057],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019133511,0.00005722363,0.00038499755,0.00027356477,0.0000054392553,0.00045613002,0.09950917,0.00034915135,0.00022402272,0.8809159,0.003369453,0.014435784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045007342,0.00009664119,0.000759411,0.0010936019,0.000014137442,0.0008783593,0.094623506,0.0027168868,0.00045821763,0.64125204,0.25801232,0.000049938222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006498036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008690544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028056227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01139054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013618978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14837724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094167406","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3392","title":"Communities of knowledge and knowledge of communities: An appreciative inquiry into rural wellbeing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appreciative inquiry; Rural community; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Participatory action research; Value (mathematics); Pedagogy; Political science; Computer science; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.16513268228625094,"score_gpt":0.38562656311813426,"score_spread":0.22049388083188332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094167406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8661496,0.0037438732,0.024633357,0.030416727,0.0002564855,0.0005573282,0.000053204192,0.00006114125,0.07412831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946045,0.0006982779,0.0021785214,0.00046596077,0.000020961497,0.000114416805,0.000006038235,0.000012835937,0.0018983696],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765732,0.020196082,0.0003052392,0.00058404927,0.001153815,0.0011875546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696417,0.023335679,0.0021626407,0.0012780795,0.0014754884,0.0021063087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020686723,0.0003905402,0.0006692889,0.0030914461,0.019285355,0.010482842,0.0018023443,0.0030091442,0.002439183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028327458,0.00045411955,0.00034405687,0.0021992445,0.033762842,0.012850288,0.022538025,0.0049648965,0.00017595784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010285508,0.000031512307,0.0015595626,0.00007027301,0.000002413911,0.0003571243,0.966491,0.00005582135,0.0001867948,0.0222597,0.00035806047,0.008617567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020472467,0.000030912342,0.0007143676,0.00011630682,0.0000021582116,0.00021648142,0.9751184,0.00007916534,0.000102646474,0.007804015,0.01580093,0.000012694618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053766696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077414257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020686723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047172187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008562357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10940319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115278257","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v8i1.3936","title":"Shifting the evaluative gaze: Community-based program evaluation in the homeless sector","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Participatory action research; Public relations; Community development; Participatory evaluation; Citizen journalism; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Housing First; Economic growth; Political science; Psychology; Mental health; Social science","score_opus":0.6728354869410879,"score_gpt":0.6143010548367264,"score_spread":0.05853443210436149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115278257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8367136,0.004357702,0.024204863,0.029226156,0.0012400869,0.06450632,0.00017911034,0.0002570217,0.039315075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404407,0.0011202031,0.025077537,0.0030636652,0.0001126013,0.028589392,0.000040374347,0.00004663659,0.0015090398],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.608633,0.37215778,0.005081787,0.0019865443,0.00737881,0.0047620577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7800783,0.18221898,0.0067695496,0.007436977,0.014492386,0.009003652],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.28500688,0.0008696065,0.0011891179,0.0030487478,0.009617615,0.007892403,0.0035770582,0.003795833,0.004999046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2257594,0.0007919635,0.0011062798,0.002057634,0.011169428,0.006473615,0.016411658,0.005366225,0.00037376498],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038783443,0.035785623,0.010804101,0.009549746,0.00040438212,0.0010765798,0.38320264,0.0027180112,0.0021640456,0.025787046,0.008108484,0.5165209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01692619,0.060566425,0.028204877,0.018197287,0.0008171143,0.00060381554,0.7633392,0.0064722984,0.006396116,0.034091577,0.06394225,0.0004427668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052696634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01373723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28500688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012300902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037627384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8817138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165189542","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v8i1.3676","title":"Simulation as a tool for developing knowledge mobilisation strategies: Innovative knowledge transfer in youth services","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Interprofessional Education and Collaboration","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Knowledge transfer; Best practice; Knowledge management; Software deployment; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Process (computing); Service provider; Service (business); Public relations; Medical education; Business; Nursing; Computer science; Medicine; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.39771198171949795,"score_gpt":0.580945568686916,"score_spread":0.1832335869674181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165189542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6762217,0.0010746573,0.26754746,0.0028738773,0.00017193714,0.0032882069,0.00034246405,0.0018402269,0.046639383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69377935,0.0012086721,0.29827338,0.00025900282,0.00002205651,0.002726443,0.00024493577,0.00012792562,0.003358159],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940698,0.0047239363,0.00023262895,0.00021447836,0.00046653728,0.00029268337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99118924,0.0070735253,0.00030637113,0.00059953076,0.00028855275,0.00054271903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009291989,0.00087200606,0.00054646836,0.0015471273,0.0012735225,0.0034692823,0.0021501991,0.0015790375,0.0042866957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015630936,0.00054036995,0.000979696,0.001239077,0.0022434015,0.0026513769,0.005692254,0.0012607925,0.0007131671],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013504558,0.007199269,0.023103101,0.0043549263,0.00022269423,0.0023783045,0.2158995,0.05379625,0.015788512,0.047532815,0.0066107754,0.62176335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020564396,0.012011396,0.02268453,0.009762387,0.0006646038,0.0041302196,0.16298649,0.25688577,0.052850373,0.18293825,0.29216954,0.00085995044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016803441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019948606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009291989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019006107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045860577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049141347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518918535","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v9i1.4802","title":"'Culture' as HIV prevention: Indigenous youth speak up!","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; University of Victoria; York University; Native Youth Sexual Health Network; McMaster University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Youth empowerment; Positive Youth Development; Empowerment; Resistance (ecology); Youth studies; Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology; Political science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.16031476990104193,"score_gpt":0.4450391758461417,"score_spread":0.2847244059450998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518918535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86255485,0.0061567742,0.0017692996,0.0472139,0.0013203922,0.00011195806,0.00008673364,0.00010520405,0.08068098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97639924,0.0028549752,0.0011253573,0.0054619284,0.00013178338,0.000080204416,0.000030645624,0.000055666977,0.0138602285],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690056,0.0017044046,0.00005138371,0.00013049261,0.0003925087,0.00082071207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982748,0.0004112089,0.00020314833,0.00009973268,0.00030245434,0.0007085592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003452892,0.00044346863,0.00044582423,0.0005669881,0.018138796,0.006361638,0.0010517135,0.0015280196,0.0050679985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038353424,0.00036938288,0.0004524491,0.0006058192,0.009254756,0.0049496694,0.008497443,0.0057224357,0.0005646871],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070707274,0.000033242217,0.004663722,0.000064267726,0.00000534032,0.00033461538,0.9781807,0.000008694804,0.00025504114,0.0031944714,0.0020817867,0.011170938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028397717,0.000037413618,0.0048788553,0.00018235394,0.000016786538,0.00030876597,0.96059793,0.00002458948,0.00014426016,0.0010471345,0.03274264,0.000016372864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08614138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13015951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08614138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034734807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006471726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17127997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519146971","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v9i1.4729","title":"Caught up in power: Exploring discursive frictions in community research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Sociology; Participatory action research; Empowerment; Reflexivity; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.9168596997342899,"score_gpt":0.7060147559348734,"score_spread":0.21084494379941654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519146971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6145315,0.01030922,0.2068477,0.03934663,0.00061492476,0.0010880195,0.000107959924,0.00024161888,0.12691237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98531425,0.00073055417,0.0110968575,0.0007174666,0.000081611586,0.00038372815,0.000024534638,0.00007710136,0.0015739539],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.78060305,0.19071315,0.004325832,0.0068913004,0.012334246,0.0051323217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6956117,0.26179042,0.014269954,0.017749289,0.0068525113,0.0037260882],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12560928,0.0010334867,0.0017272803,0.01281232,0.027470557,0.025575407,0.006300939,0.006016126,0.0040925005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20100087,0.0013973415,0.0012509414,0.008568662,0.097455814,0.038484573,0.03255122,0.006935353,0.0005067108],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029244593,0.000025899068,0.001382189,0.00016562961,0.000016934076,0.00035760168,0.8867816,0.00019522992,0.00018039808,0.10031311,0.0003091942,0.010242964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041624073,0.000059450216,0.0019400802,0.00093380595,0.000026770616,0.0006202936,0.74170685,0.0015122426,0.00048487156,0.21747631,0.0351293,0.0000684922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005169396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052337027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013514421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009551037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6642933},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2519640351","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v9i1.4353","title":"Fundamental researcher attributes: Reflections on ways to facilitate participation in Community Psychology doctoral dissertation research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Participatory action research; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Social science","score_opus":0.8599943278471819,"score_gpt":0.6895646960220765,"score_spread":0.1704296318251054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519640351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5965398,0.003922738,0.09773324,0.17614801,0.002611896,0.0026494742,0.000052116433,0.00040478885,0.119937986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949457,0.002062974,0.033980336,0.0055196914,0.00029457617,0.00088338007,0.000022091104,0.00009152579,0.007688317],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.84441245,0.14044207,0.0028670782,0.0017136857,0.0064486098,0.0041160826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89237595,0.07622344,0.00485448,0.007309432,0.007830491,0.011406136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1066945,0.0006498654,0.00054325914,0.0018939639,0.01821495,0.017554756,0.003280157,0.005262387,0.0019898962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10437233,0.0008122373,0.0011985786,0.0012017208,0.027479623,0.012167362,0.023457617,0.011532465,0.00050510885],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030702868,0.00016843619,0.0020026038,0.0002435527,0.000006764004,0.0006426521,0.92694944,0.00006439026,0.0010418765,0.041769624,0.0023727445,0.024707112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026697959,0.00019044931,0.0014775065,0.00054153986,0.000011118226,0.0012602417,0.8594095,0.0002454195,0.0010006237,0.020321453,0.11546816,0.000047229958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001151296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025562113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8933055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005928539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017225891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5642612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519754422","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v9i1.4875","title":"Engaging youth in post-disaster research: Lessons learned from a creative methods approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Royal Roads University; Colorado State University","keywords":"Participatory action research; The arts; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Psychological resilience; Action research; Youth engagement; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Sociology; Resilience (materials science); Political science; Psychology; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.9499925531101757,"score_gpt":0.7393746885007009,"score_spread":0.21061786460947485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519754422","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12815915,0.050179,0.621586,0.08939384,0.0033696194,0.010891304,0.00035381297,0.0009954398,0.095071845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41114935,0.02408375,0.53452176,0.005975966,0.00048781504,0.013710334,0.00015322636,0.0003778027,0.009539923],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9095218,0.08149374,0.0017226873,0.001887248,0.00289575,0.002478629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9137307,0.074491575,0.0011307551,0.004164793,0.0029399649,0.0035421292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.122629106,0.0016484366,0.001135637,0.0040052207,0.00967918,0.014949304,0.0065940246,0.0037241476,0.005209701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04112233,0.0009398091,0.0018375585,0.002513024,0.025397094,0.012352314,0.021528823,0.00608602,0.00094638026],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011521942,0.0008591226,0.0034007798,0.003291002,0.00007927039,0.0015874583,0.65956813,0.00055215496,0.0009655875,0.078937754,0.005797693,0.24484591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023095081,0.00068314624,0.0029029837,0.0105903745,0.000115758885,0.0019671824,0.5748221,0.0011744964,0.0018447965,0.14205013,0.26350567,0.00011243998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035998588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011572447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122629106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063833403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020235159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64853245},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2520419254","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v9i1.4415","title":"Mobilizing Minds: Integrated knowledge translation and youth engagement in the development of mental health information resources","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Confederation College; Manitoba Health; University of Manitoba","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Mental Health Commission; York University","keywords":"Mental health; Knowledge translation; Mental health literacy; Psychology; Citizen journalism; Participatory action research; Youth engagement; Process (computing); Medical education; Public relations; Mental illness; Medicine; Knowledge management; Psychiatry; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.7744764030983363,"score_gpt":0.642694049197663,"score_spread":0.13178235390067328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520419254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8421883,0.0016090574,0.03585422,0.018689994,0.00018821683,0.003233384,0.00021680987,0.00030975856,0.09771028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95333344,0.0010134055,0.0393277,0.00080376153,0.000017866605,0.0013353716,0.00006777671,0.000042304553,0.004058414],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825357,0.013166104,0.00039098164,0.0006135719,0.0013136166,0.001980102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905054,0.0058439113,0.0005059411,0.00064636563,0.0006095203,0.0018888571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025180215,0.00048303226,0.00042358565,0.0017870928,0.007986699,0.00663799,0.0014470167,0.0011979908,0.0032615177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01942015,0.00036162417,0.0006211918,0.0014669088,0.007822625,0.0039276076,0.01736633,0.0019634892,0.0002678388],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021146276,0.0013401272,0.01663302,0.0008983123,0.000054807882,0.00062731956,0.6701493,0.00055844383,0.0022688776,0.040540155,0.004289724,0.2624284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029469276,0.0013019281,0.030095652,0.0027191138,0.00020262033,0.0004738353,0.7386548,0.002769938,0.006173725,0.06789127,0.14929745,0.00012493294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08531174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17125534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08531174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014699573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06382018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16963035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2648644805","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v10i1.5202","title":"Evidence to impact: A community knowledge mobilisation evaluation framework","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Community of practice; Government (linguistics); Knowledge translation; Futures contract; Traditional knowledge; Public relations; Psychology; Medical education; Political science; Business; Computer science; Pedagogy; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.9598708593039994,"score_gpt":0.8130205246968195,"score_spread":0.1468503346071799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2648644805","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020647662,0.08849205,0.2738999,0.13383587,0.00471704,0.2812949,0.010484011,0.0012885823,0.18534005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13937995,0.011320225,0.6379094,0.008111994,0.00029321894,0.19925752,0.0021045357,0.00016757249,0.0014555736],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.2632824,0.58705616,0.07416104,0.0112679405,0.05753323,0.0066992654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33363202,0.52384335,0.026156763,0.017984064,0.089291446,0.009092494],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.62801117,0.0062646936,0.011669542,0.06335296,0.013886014,0.029936446,0.013803814,0.013717029,0.011067911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63246405,0.003250016,0.012827498,0.035598546,0.01844364,0.021097116,0.031485345,0.012210617,0.0013219587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022601262,0.0013073398,0.009635561,0.18203935,0.0072053717,0.0006471703,0.023634829,0.012400322,0.00055243605,0.25111577,0.023470322,0.48573136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053686183,0.004567337,0.009969155,0.47220427,0.014299505,0.00036706778,0.024555769,0.014327956,0.0024285268,0.202905,0.24824376,0.00076299993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051570177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053685393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37198883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088586666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2000363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64274424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2701668726","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v10i1.5151","title":"Challenging the empowerment expectation: Learning, alienation and design possibilities in community-university research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; General partnership; Sociology; Action research; Public relations; Empowerment; Mainstream; Transformative learning; Narrative; Community organizing; Community development; Community building; Citizen journalism; Community organization; Alienation; Action (physics); Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.37441259983298336,"score_gpt":0.4806579818566796,"score_spread":0.10624538202369621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2701668726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43784872,0.0032383595,0.18555199,0.15850733,0.00082224223,0.0010208144,0.000063893145,0.0004663945,0.21248028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97801423,0.00037675878,0.014638997,0.0024267887,0.00006838038,0.0008774394,0.000014133149,0.000058706504,0.0035244806],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.768118,0.21528006,0.0023399657,0.0036299813,0.0069023794,0.0037295464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85590494,0.12089603,0.004798275,0.009741684,0.0033575508,0.0053015715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13881633,0.0008874371,0.0007863266,0.0021203596,0.01696424,0.021147823,0.004045262,0.0057233013,0.003949511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0876476,0.0010533414,0.0014007965,0.0014581626,0.12169574,0.026481137,0.03520213,0.007213479,0.00054037716],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073683856,0.00011224245,0.0025768154,0.00030931167,0.000019726995,0.00058344705,0.5750306,0.00039747645,0.00045292306,0.40038425,0.0013641523,0.018695358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018565117,0.00039202775,0.0017325811,0.00088134484,0.000051156516,0.0013684223,0.47761407,0.002479695,0.001749622,0.39333543,0.12010365,0.00010637386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026875264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034586852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98303574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102090165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011152304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7341397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805590496","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v11i1.5584","title":"Exploring Community-based Research Values and Principles: Lessons Learned from a Delphi Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Victoria","funders":"Nature","keywords":"Institution; Delphi method; Discipline; Sociology; Delphi; Research design; Psychology; Management science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Social science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.9018461245266791,"score_gpt":0.5094195524366811,"score_spread":0.392426572089998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805590496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83493006,0.0012463855,0.08602944,0.03771514,0.0002930983,0.0061833863,0.00016532464,0.00015645711,0.033280704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554536,0.00094967894,0.037193403,0.0020072039,0.000030919793,0.0018547958,0.00006312981,0.000072314804,0.00237504],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8262919,0.14822644,0.004791934,0.002885296,0.01085732,0.0069470815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7870195,0.17533483,0.0028165854,0.004521278,0.02358803,0.006719752],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17295696,0.001025737,0.0010365814,0.0048616165,0.012248859,0.010400375,0.003550175,0.0032806105,0.0025409951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14343844,0.0011715284,0.00062928913,0.0029963667,0.0127599025,0.010392972,0.015771847,0.0051025506,0.00048467488],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006792591,0.00015147643,0.0034709643,0.0004569832,0.000016481708,0.0007526464,0.9353034,0.0005072453,0.001135478,0.011328767,0.0015459837,0.045262646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017771203,0.000110889145,0.0012401976,0.0007157108,0.000010671638,0.00023720486,0.97044295,0.0013305531,0.00047345675,0.009032993,0.016331889,0.000055687993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013671836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021064974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82704306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012250042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030736303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9146948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805866085","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v11i1.5439","title":"Expectations of Field Supervisors in Kenya: Implications for Community-based Human Service Practicums","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Higher Education and Employability","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Practicum; Employability; Kenya; CLARITY; Thematic analysis; Medical education; Psychology; Experiential learning; Pedagogy; Public relations; Qualitative research; Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.38009804173076306,"score_gpt":0.5445361942675295,"score_spread":0.16443815253676647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805866085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99646014,0.00022879039,0.00016458108,0.0015108587,0.000026087338,0.000046965855,0.00002013487,0.0000043946043,0.0015380416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986572,0.00025658804,0.00019377,0.00031697386,0.000010655429,0.000040791936,0.000020133668,0.0000027926917,0.00050090364],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965965,0.0017828634,0.00016193242,0.00013245748,0.0005332206,0.00079307996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857486,0.0043522757,0.002714187,0.00018976747,0.0022009898,0.0047942633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070857895,0.0003015527,0.00023192313,0.00047500347,0.004130593,0.0023442751,0.00087718153,0.0011132419,0.0023175385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01595341,0.00038601834,0.0002069155,0.00035571828,0.001941974,0.0009984728,0.0018753873,0.0019315998,0.0003149783],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002200979,0.0005415076,0.24070613,0.0003453929,0.000012770577,0.0030766148,0.7250526,0.00015072674,0.002697132,0.0006765745,0.0028236872,0.023696681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009365276,0.0003617467,0.07122937,0.00023896023,0.0000047453896,0.0004101716,0.92395586,0.00015348333,0.00025276325,0.00015696119,0.0032028833,0.000023777076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010074258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017341869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010074258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002424121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046070567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03747368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806302925","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v11i1.5527","title":"Brokering Community–campus Partnerships: An Analytical Framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Lakehead University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Public relations; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Diversity (politics); Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.4671991221658809,"score_gpt":0.5218571800187796,"score_spread":0.05465805785289868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806302925","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04549004,0.03177557,0.6529196,0.05252531,0.0006969869,0.0034692732,0.0005589605,0.0003253911,0.2122388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49741066,0.020198157,0.4666381,0.0021197787,0.00032736757,0.0042484715,0.0004306715,0.00013288655,0.008493926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97604764,0.017801864,0.0011752754,0.0012298471,0.002428664,0.001316678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791293,0.013848935,0.0021762731,0.00083185977,0.0026969407,0.0013166427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027617944,0.0011881527,0.0011704458,0.017683128,0.009740514,0.022459075,0.0053885453,0.0055860486,0.0033605464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021957858,0.0008911828,0.0018093219,0.020261372,0.022433424,0.02399304,0.013200386,0.0038759506,0.0007007252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006387949,0.000042207135,0.0010571112,0.00038958734,0.000016895552,0.00042470577,0.02497849,0.0013255404,0.00013016368,0.9538232,0.0021044018,0.015701396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015078043,0.00005702422,0.0012445949,0.0022496076,0.000042099986,0.0005821931,0.07001368,0.010861847,0.0003121472,0.7385623,0.17598285,0.000076598626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073148897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007835081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027617944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013545039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018278476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1460594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908696624","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v12i1.6013","title":"Building a children's health and environment research agenda in Alberta, Canada: A multi-stakeholder engagement process","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Covenant Health; University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Stakeholder engagement; Stakeholder; Process (computing); Process management; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Business; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.2804128335423144,"score_gpt":0.4589881417506577,"score_spread":0.17857530820834333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908696624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6839492,0.008218891,0.024335574,0.1372921,0.0007358396,0.007638802,0.0014631461,0.00033530995,0.1360312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9102167,0.0039828345,0.043319687,0.009197061,0.000065181885,0.0020727715,0.0005972754,0.00010879621,0.030439666],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9620877,0.019275516,0.0009380784,0.0022685644,0.0075545083,0.007875729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731942,0.010833865,0.0008273198,0.00063481915,0.0055310517,0.008978758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04543726,0.00087690115,0.00073300995,0.002218769,0.038742054,0.011341913,0.0038281407,0.0039214916,0.0036672314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021050554,0.0009871019,0.0008897905,0.0041151163,0.012328358,0.002890595,0.01357794,0.005797206,0.00035476292],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033317338,0.00049128337,0.041442335,0.0014430825,0.00009812501,0.0098870015,0.7330179,0.005940888,0.0063949833,0.05873414,0.031340636,0.110876545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007136805,0.00018228329,0.03434318,0.00096875464,0.00007261177,0.0003320569,0.71352416,0.002383101,0.0016703863,0.009321069,0.23689948,0.00023147606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98062783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99140537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74435484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25564516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.49897304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8633461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909884955","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v12i1.6193","title":"Combining feminist intersectional and community-engaged research commitments: Adaptations for scoping reviews and secondary analyses of national data sets","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Guelph; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Intersectionality; Reflexivity; Sociology; Deliberation; Feminism; Gender studies; Participatory action research; Community engagement; Public relations; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.6912125058013038,"score_gpt":0.5861191774131206,"score_spread":0.1050933283881832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909884955","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02160403,0.04648263,0.6401811,0.04273868,0.0047494136,0.1566516,0.0151648335,0.0022872817,0.07014047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059644956,0.010770829,0.6993957,0.003430595,0.00032649038,0.21781555,0.0031770081,0.0011214378,0.004317452],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.3820296,0.45382366,0.09577358,0.016932057,0.047054697,0.004386442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.28131852,0.45259297,0.030618113,0.10943798,0.122824185,0.0032081616],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5724194,0.00280116,0.004323315,0.055339396,0.010526225,0.02087983,0.009909468,0.004613492,0.011307963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6169772,0.0037894445,0.0056688436,0.06612011,0.019311946,0.015727777,0.031775124,0.006981069,0.0031315817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032732938,0.00015346301,0.0068111112,0.110148214,0.0013945104,0.0011432793,0.379912,0.0011574787,0.0026144478,0.08144418,0.038038515,0.37685546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025502866,0.000165139,0.010400338,0.15305947,0.0016140973,0.0006518866,0.1243652,0.0013834556,0.0026290154,0.07469663,0.63042396,0.00035571828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04016697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123961404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4275806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029710127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.119396865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5272831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946195929","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v12i1.6342","title":"Embracing complexity: Co-creation with retired immigrant women","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bow Valley College","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Immigration; Co-creation; Agency (philosophy); Face (sociological concept); Citizen journalism; Participatory action research; Reflexivity; Process (computing); Power (physics); Sociology; Participatory design; Public relations; Knowledge management; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Social science; Operations management; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.12026785190246693,"score_gpt":0.36594555431407544,"score_spread":0.24567770241160852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946195929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890953,0.00032061353,0.0012598719,0.0025217151,0.00007528055,0.00012396238,0.000009603983,0.000014988061,0.0065785884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993891,0.0002737696,0.001353485,0.00060605415,0.000023486611,0.0001277596,0.000008179355,0.000008809932,0.0037074033],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914812,0.00645618,0.00011479202,0.00033957887,0.00039251547,0.0012157528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922013,0.0042223376,0.0006068412,0.0005325339,0.0005398721,0.0018971133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012228528,0.000635066,0.0004973531,0.0012359222,0.022421436,0.008530628,0.0014422107,0.0023129948,0.0033437444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010370961,0.0003366863,0.0005099606,0.0007864704,0.01145388,0.0038353864,0.017042626,0.002789284,0.00046540418],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050804556,0.00012549713,0.0049560727,0.000049576156,0.0000063115085,0.00073531416,0.97730947,0.000029222665,0.00064060965,0.0029293413,0.00051240507,0.0126553215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071108025,0.00012854926,0.0010206831,0.000048947182,0.0000054821303,0.0002527321,0.9887888,0.00006333082,0.0002146264,0.00080038543,0.008659374,0.00000998421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006185895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016450992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022421436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00241365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00628714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06467146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950429336","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v12i1.6496","title":"Political economics, collective action and wicked socio-ecological problems: A practice story from the field","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Australian Government; Agriculture Victoria; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Collective action; Public relations; Government (linguistics); Politics; Wicked problem; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Participatory action research; Political science; Management; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.24222860880309935,"score_gpt":0.39639041747801457,"score_spread":0.15416180867491522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950429336","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24110042,0.023782453,0.034983862,0.5530156,0.0037688795,0.0004471623,0.000060326194,0.0001209626,0.14272031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9252252,0.011138127,0.011765895,0.029840406,0.0010563887,0.0005524405,0.000036303965,0.00017469483,0.020210551],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9557319,0.03601733,0.0006209278,0.0019085618,0.0029295902,0.0027918033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9393701,0.049681224,0.0019135998,0.0022068797,0.002468647,0.004359519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044857588,0.0012342187,0.0019996082,0.0030051772,0.04404128,0.027360255,0.0043785144,0.018408854,0.0028510862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03631472,0.0010491982,0.0010708241,0.003924236,0.10579179,0.02625646,0.024298677,0.023885604,0.0006686224],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021323056,0.0001039691,0.0004044592,0.000236319,0.000008196862,0.0016206866,0.7618246,0.0002886618,0.00029180245,0.21687454,0.007391473,0.0109339515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027272095,0.00008534466,0.0003370181,0.0007551764,0.000008078871,0.00095060107,0.6738757,0.00048155145,0.00026757375,0.090451784,0.23271045,0.000049360784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011124294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013658076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044857588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017635746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0154768005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23723245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996902741","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v12i2.6726","title":"Ensuring durability of community-university engagement in a challenging context: Empirical evidence on Science Shops","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Lyon; Technological University Dublin; European Commission; Queen's University; University College Cork; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Public relations; Curriculum; Formative assessment; Political science; Citizen journalism; Empirical evidence; Summative assessment; Empirical research; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.43997730342276736,"score_gpt":0.47679141223307153,"score_spread":0.03681410881030417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996902741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787723,0.0012284007,0.0016664161,0.0013461768,0.000031212097,0.00012749874,0.00003462787,0.000015350734,0.0167779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855214,0.00041362192,0.00038303403,0.00011827039,0.000008896576,0.000038027913,0.000017803039,0.000010390305,0.00045786196],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96682245,0.021834899,0.00096456084,0.0028778156,0.004163699,0.0033366343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8118195,0.1409033,0.016383149,0.010371333,0.00821446,0.01230822],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028429748,0.00043494365,0.0010595638,0.0034572955,0.010877791,0.012729615,0.0032729763,0.0038162032,0.00891344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07028506,0.00076371175,0.0005348843,0.0028722782,0.020340446,0.010474452,0.016491454,0.0025085313,0.0013185022],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031824035,0.0017825671,0.079663105,0.0017545301,0.00010312311,0.0021318581,0.80161625,0.0003021195,0.0007993484,0.015728641,0.0014611231,0.09433914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043425982,0.0005168343,0.074592926,0.0012944398,0.000043884396,0.0005740428,0.8915059,0.00043926376,0.000553902,0.0061185346,0.024251927,0.00006491145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025574628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067556994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028714042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005841284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15035266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998197509","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v12i2.6856","title":"The University of Gondar, Queen’s University and Mastercard Foundation Scholars Program: A partnership for disability-inclusive higher education in Ethiopia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mentorship; General partnership; Population; Capacity building; Community-based rehabilitation; Public relations; Medical education; Political science; Sociology; Rehabilitation; Medicine","score_opus":0.0803837894828188,"score_gpt":0.40545795039810406,"score_spread":0.3250741609152853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998197509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41011855,0.028781319,0.020018952,0.22819988,0.016047772,0.0023039659,0.0008937323,0.00071071787,0.29292512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6544427,0.01252992,0.03643731,0.020352444,0.00088940584,0.00089793967,0.00037154852,0.00014516729,0.27393356],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997922,0.0007320058,0.0000414447,0.00011270727,0.00032766687,0.0008642329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926489,0.00024247535,0.00018184031,0.00010218426,0.00034882902,0.006475723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005151418,0.0003656369,0.00021436774,0.0006167661,0.0045032897,0.0046292082,0.0010098414,0.0011325959,0.015363639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022428806,0.00028048523,0.00026368242,0.00051571155,0.0011270242,0.0016734637,0.0066251736,0.002104305,0.0020351452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004053313,0.0024720796,0.035977818,0.0011039609,0.00008707132,0.004107678,0.01761292,0.0010428106,0.006418177,0.08149164,0.35138226,0.49789828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058018148,0.00033006098,0.015843118,0.0006003115,0.000017678682,0.001224856,0.018889558,0.0004056812,0.0011951703,0.0029274863,0.9584772,0.000030818876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034846328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074633732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015363639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002280413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041173477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05139649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034522349","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.7037","title":"Assessing excellence in community-based research: Lessons from research with Syrian refugee newcomers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Community Based Research","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Refugee; Excellence; Public relations; Psychological intervention; Sociology; Community engagement; Adaptability; Psychological resilience; Political science; Psychology; Management; Social psychology","score_opus":0.9653541948052593,"score_gpt":0.7630462884017304,"score_spread":0.20230790640352891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034522349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84949446,0.017276013,0.023941632,0.081890725,0.0011673053,0.003368119,0.0001352166,0.0001694226,0.022557013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9328171,0.00877498,0.046628606,0.00532283,0.00023118794,0.0019084614,0.00007456318,0.000141205,0.0041009225],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7197316,0.2468953,0.0075946264,0.005071309,0.011854948,0.008852182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68899876,0.22277904,0.009623706,0.01691002,0.038301766,0.023386732],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24585868,0.0013440517,0.0023217693,0.005119764,0.023917466,0.02125026,0.006388605,0.007169306,0.0021703804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2117208,0.0014988384,0.0015304602,0.0053164675,0.0458257,0.017292105,0.033249922,0.008042077,0.0005515702],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033209708,0.00015727068,0.0031366684,0.00075982016,0.000028911818,0.0010099405,0.9674727,0.00011000518,0.00025206796,0.0028278974,0.0010331547,0.023178462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021410928,0.00021445558,0.0021352621,0.0011563237,0.0000200123,0.00044318786,0.97112703,0.000102681835,0.0003474129,0.0029519706,0.021431578,0.000048555852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04120697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12645574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75414133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027013136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062206566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92999053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034602061","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6745","title":"The tree of community knowledge and engagement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Sociology; Disadvantaged; Participatory action research; Narrative; Citizen journalism; Storytelling; Community engagement; Traditional knowledge; Transformative learning; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Anthropology; Ecology","score_opus":0.5197415007244252,"score_gpt":0.5479708754467487,"score_spread":0.028229374722323564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034602061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096125625,0.010132872,0.14028634,0.10314113,0.00078997144,0.00036723443,0.00022117814,0.0004874805,0.6484482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96923864,0.0018528325,0.013549642,0.0021335564,0.00012887888,0.00021199975,0.000059535414,0.00015168388,0.012673337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822088,0.01263376,0.00029970886,0.001538415,0.0022269746,0.0010922893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99109954,0.0048030755,0.0006136095,0.0012717317,0.00077655667,0.0014354584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011746799,0.0007171486,0.0006342385,0.0033575706,0.015910005,0.019045385,0.00229317,0.0050250487,0.007159273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113461865,0.0005298801,0.000570338,0.002119357,0.07796121,0.024655903,0.021763613,0.005936655,0.0010283564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019337946,0.000020676565,0.00065127015,0.00013999922,0.000012238725,0.00035994296,0.16553742,0.0003183096,0.00027417808,0.81293845,0.0037125298,0.016015688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013464451,0.000035586192,0.00048637216,0.00038975006,0.000009713538,0.0003262592,0.08109474,0.00084763236,0.00023434422,0.72301096,0.19352368,0.000027543234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051827626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053853923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019045385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073325983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008517989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062123716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035260022","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.7110","title":"Injustices épistémiques et recherche participative: un agenda de recherche à la croisée de l’université et des communautés","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9307859812820833,"score_gpt":0.6900613775980631,"score_spread":0.24072460368402027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035260022","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1899469,0.07110155,0.13446657,0.35266215,0.0025926968,0.0006814164,0.00029161724,0.00029087937,0.24796626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8994211,0.021773992,0.0294583,0.008625746,0.0005566261,0.00077959336,0.00013322644,0.00022352376,0.039027955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.88942534,0.08654873,0.0022474532,0.004273375,0.013326856,0.004178262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80316573,0.1328853,0.011982927,0.013247331,0.031982563,0.006736123],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10032349,0.0010481512,0.0016375305,0.006605163,0.017895877,0.029905003,0.00361779,0.0066642202,0.008512506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08232539,0.00077561376,0.0012589312,0.008292097,0.045320593,0.02835044,0.013339877,0.010925949,0.0015053435],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008287087,0.000093588504,0.0056799036,0.0009063818,0.00004776146,0.00025568245,0.30086762,0.0005027163,0.0005486121,0.6317882,0.0036950603,0.055531595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004703225,0.0001794483,0.01113876,0.005135456,0.00008562412,0.000358614,0.43928948,0.0015286605,0.0021026582,0.18714371,0.35282773,0.00016275604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091900714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09165373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9821041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037307583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07851875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53056765},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3035543251","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6862","title":"Engaging a community for youth mental health and wellness: Reflections and lessons learned","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; General partnership; Alliance; Community engagement; Public relations; Action plan; Plan (archaeology); Medical education; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Management","score_opus":0.9289957685516339,"score_gpt":0.7375774755457462,"score_spread":0.19141829300588775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035543251","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2538102,0.01266105,0.009846467,0.69201565,0.0063734287,0.00097312045,0.00012808626,0.00023409634,0.0239579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8592745,0.017140824,0.018249432,0.088255346,0.0017818854,0.0012842877,0.000108762186,0.00030210364,0.013602769],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9301478,0.054831907,0.0013512141,0.0016382937,0.0040655555,0.007965176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9350253,0.035548102,0.0019600443,0.0018096478,0.0063269315,0.019329999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050226524,0.0013685634,0.0011174994,0.001748728,0.02422326,0.015527968,0.005684061,0.011668419,0.0038476763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06015754,0.0011846817,0.0014607246,0.0014657192,0.021775855,0.015761007,0.024683002,0.021509673,0.0007168852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007875379,0.0010402716,0.003639145,0.0011431372,0.000043200213,0.0048361975,0.85621405,0.00022502687,0.00058158505,0.015812006,0.033873286,0.08251325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003089924,0.00022966189,0.0012929259,0.0013609144,0.000021115808,0.0010257836,0.92527235,0.00015870255,0.00031875845,0.0061598606,0.064068355,0.000060631195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018586563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04506298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050226524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086632855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031141326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26562643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035732902","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6703","title":"Epistemic injustices and participatory research: A research agenda at the crossroads of university and community","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Knowledge production; Process (computing); Multidisciplinary approach; Engineering ethics; Community-based participatory research; Knowledge management; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5911988744289527,"score_gpt":0.5169218799859034,"score_spread":0.07427699444304925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035732902","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10206793,0.041506566,0.43977252,0.26030514,0.0031841048,0.009176634,0.00016123429,0.00032750392,0.14349836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8075654,0.007872742,0.16558257,0.0065723886,0.00052647816,0.0087974565,0.000056106914,0.00016749505,0.0028594136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.27373713,0.69044834,0.006573777,0.0076220315,0.015645465,0.005973203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35343528,0.582133,0.013125551,0.024922648,0.018353462,0.008030132],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.45452145,0.001866218,0.0039125914,0.011977712,0.033902153,0.056793615,0.007361925,0.016265318,0.0031239365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2788397,0.0021802657,0.0022165976,0.015135006,0.1501961,0.07735154,0.044787727,0.015063796,0.00054073986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007754315,0.00017599216,0.0021590695,0.0012971775,0.00006118195,0.00025466978,0.33574474,0.0006954318,0.00015242504,0.635886,0.00095061824,0.022545103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015173218,0.00040886502,0.001077651,0.0058824234,0.00008709856,0.00042417814,0.4816306,0.0025398547,0.00059597427,0.4238227,0.08325735,0.00012154931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008108428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007562647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96609783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02810432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07609179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67267215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110716173","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.7208","title":"Mobilising knowledge on newcomers: Engaging key stakeholders to establish a research hub for Alberta","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Global Health Workforce Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Grassroots; Stakeholder; Public relations; Immigration; Process (computing); Refugee; Stakeholder engagement; Work (physics); Service (business); Business; Knowledge management; Sociology; Political science; Marketing; Politics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7639935676177222,"score_gpt":0.6227138609419187,"score_spread":0.14127970667580347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110716173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67585135,0.0062713637,0.024410805,0.13131343,0.0022357928,0.0046092127,0.00029349368,0.0003857701,0.15462877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.915362,0.0032340614,0.029114883,0.008188655,0.00012168069,0.00093132706,0.00020091375,0.00015320275,0.042693265],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824839,0.009984997,0.00029619446,0.00094332604,0.002129901,0.0041616736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779839,0.005396918,0.0005635746,0.00074353657,0.0034519527,0.011860127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022283755,0.0005397198,0.00065345207,0.0016912217,0.037021153,0.017194565,0.004389001,0.004162726,0.00830251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017899532,0.0005895099,0.0005667552,0.0014793278,0.010006289,0.006517042,0.028571224,0.006350119,0.0011182891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024132816,0.00043049283,0.012282357,0.00064089225,0.000035005163,0.00914499,0.82602274,0.0004489018,0.0044997917,0.030410983,0.02246631,0.0933762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001908291,0.00013649737,0.0040904465,0.00056564074,0.00002294374,0.00038962584,0.8289288,0.00043568204,0.00067647314,0.0051020063,0.15955676,0.00007595876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4156697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6903696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035772692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14749686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8265005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172577139","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v14i1.7665","title":"Undergraduate students’ perceptions of community engagement: A snapshot of a public research university in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Perception; Incentive; Population; Psychology; Community engagement; Student engagement; Public university; Social media; Medicine; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.3769326333865275,"score_gpt":0.45827330594461263,"score_spread":0.08134067255808514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172577139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99375665,0.00025059062,0.0001061038,0.0011337913,0.000012501909,0.00008173303,0.0004095512,0.000019061717,0.0042298823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961606,0.00040328765,0.00022119509,0.0003611439,0.0000061160827,0.00003288038,0.00019957466,0.000011442136,0.002603806],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979377,0.00023701476,0.00005164159,0.00017101613,0.00054002757,0.0010626854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952679,0.0002060892,0.00023744666,0.00007007974,0.0011832648,0.0030352622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010090936,0.0003638489,0.0006973762,0.001897552,0.015246431,0.004928084,0.0015921913,0.00090621086,0.0034267644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019803254,0.00042191002,0.00041553736,0.0039728265,0.002990259,0.0012338449,0.004680392,0.0016867997,0.0004305282],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037869782,0.0008042503,0.42621228,0.00036105938,0.000057988134,0.0032191707,0.48943976,0.00027403372,0.0036352614,0.001645528,0.009060625,0.06491134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007998684,0.00014432323,0.34442064,0.00013327872,0.000013454065,0.0001643696,0.64359725,0.0002277578,0.00023415308,0.0001100233,0.010884255,0.00006247197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9779799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99380314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041883934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041883934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059634577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3038906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200246050","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v14i2.7766","title":"Harnessing the Power of Stories for Rural Sustainability: Reflections on Community-Based Research on the Great Northern Peninsula of Newfoundland","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Research & Development Corporation; Canadian Historical Association; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Office of Research and Engagement, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Storytelling; Sustainability; Narrative; Scholarship; Power (physics); Community engagement; Participatory action research; Sociology; Citizen journalism; Political science; Peninsula; Economic growth; Public relations; Geography; Anthropology; Ecology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.2997044725142692,"score_gpt":0.43565953633174226,"score_spread":0.13595506381747308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200246050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94611335,0.0016805198,0.00092476245,0.016774304,0.00016649105,0.00007765389,0.00011144068,0.00003671151,0.034114774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98904306,0.0010105565,0.00047923758,0.0014763246,0.000039673152,0.00006432069,0.0000356872,0.0000419501,0.007809325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923988,0.0049173227,0.0001109539,0.00037393128,0.0004103618,0.0017885471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838457,0.012154781,0.00069014734,0.00063053874,0.00085587776,0.0018229086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007135019,0.00062503386,0.00057551253,0.0013074895,0.028949521,0.007987821,0.0025337348,0.0018542433,0.003187384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085066045,0.0005503954,0.00032577885,0.0014672742,0.030595098,0.004838907,0.010552595,0.0047176797,0.0002082251],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001454659,0.000016837383,0.0011761256,0.00005473943,0.0000045743814,0.0009337382,0.99032265,0.000059346545,0.0002576977,0.0021402657,0.0017139721,0.0033054363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015278077,0.000009567896,0.0015241893,0.00007415872,0.000004317716,0.000108445405,0.9826329,0.00003686658,0.00009997312,0.0002277187,0.0152710285,0.00000931393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.523005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8062252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.476995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031498943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01814963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9596082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200526305","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v14i2.7767","title":"Community Members as Facilitators: Reclaiming Community-Based Research as Inherently of the People","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"University Challenges and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Subjectivity; Facilitator; Hegemony; Gender studies; Community engagement; Power (physics); Community organization; Community building; Community development; Scholarship; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.4033662419539349,"score_gpt":0.4780252914659908,"score_spread":0.07465904951205593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200526305","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23327437,0.01783773,0.2864004,0.262012,0.0049268464,0.0018016404,0.000082221726,0.00077873113,0.19288601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516801,0.0020601486,0.026181174,0.006423071,0.0006001853,0.00095920946,0.00003314536,0.0002780276,0.011784945],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8457095,0.1345513,0.001808614,0.006186463,0.008020298,0.003723782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9093405,0.06050101,0.0046701524,0.00939046,0.006664065,0.00943373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.097096376,0.0012497314,0.0012943587,0.0049560755,0.023705726,0.02676847,0.0053207963,0.00833637,0.0037232381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079074115,0.0010698141,0.0010566843,0.0020884532,0.11279156,0.040906258,0.0426555,0.010848719,0.0010760055],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030011637,0.000037168833,0.000765549,0.0002476128,0.000016600023,0.0003741968,0.7135461,0.00017343524,0.0005140197,0.26370746,0.0021941054,0.018393766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005559995,0.00012474487,0.0005168904,0.0013314172,0.000041514162,0.00055629626,0.4318961,0.0009948901,0.0007487505,0.29096803,0.27269813,0.00006769511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050411196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069394596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097096376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008756929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024221316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51350087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285046730","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v15i1.8014","title":"Appraising HEI-community Partnerships: Assessing Performance, Monitoring Progress, and Evaluating Impacts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Brock University","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Higher education; Value (mathematics); Momentum (technical analysis); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.534948990344194,"score_gpt":0.5378182418501275,"score_spread":0.0028692515059335344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285046730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54287356,0.06546947,0.15989757,0.05482475,0.0026124225,0.010295447,0.0010324983,0.00038603228,0.16260827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90293115,0.014705152,0.07726256,0.0007363182,0.00029153223,0.0020773422,0.00025431847,0.00003526566,0.0017063456],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8662176,0.09635271,0.009239314,0.0019146776,0.024298465,0.00197724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76642317,0.14019305,0.03500744,0.006715817,0.043951828,0.00770877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13301069,0.001106942,0.0017450451,0.012266427,0.00294208,0.011289655,0.002166804,0.0026633677,0.001965661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2711743,0.00041426675,0.00094374554,0.00844393,0.005673259,0.009436344,0.011165879,0.002479105,0.00041140802],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047259018,0.00055653753,0.10655519,0.0070487894,0.0005888012,0.00033180346,0.030258887,0.0045272345,0.0014007447,0.040454466,0.0059515242,0.8018534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026746347,0.008911497,0.25183192,0.033808347,0.0013587782,0.0019257776,0.28581226,0.025851928,0.00985789,0.2612815,0.118127994,0.0009646448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026933698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055101337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13301069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048080524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014444573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70343614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382813050","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v16i1.8433","title":"The Full SPECTRUM: Developing a Tripartite Partnership between Community, Government and Academia for Collaborative Social Policy Research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Saskatchewan; First Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba; Assembly of First Nations; Government of Manitoba; University of Manitoba; Athabasca University; Manitoba Health","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Public policy; Business; Public sector; Capacity building; Public administration; Political science; Knowledge management; Economic growth; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.5627666639997152,"score_gpt":0.48894859798963114,"score_spread":0.07381806601008406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382813050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025857475,0.0067102327,0.20661294,0.6585117,0.008388879,0.004372879,0.00054697273,0.001724103,0.08727481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4289521,0.004435087,0.4119082,0.10495086,0.001498586,0.007042811,0.0008319755,0.0010806208,0.039299697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.83682907,0.12890288,0.0038025635,0.0056256,0.014129038,0.010710893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75388944,0.054140568,0.005550104,0.025593309,0.035036396,0.12579012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14892414,0.0012275513,0.0011981621,0.0049566207,0.018650372,0.029749757,0.0058602304,0.013565634,0.018176882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09769042,0.0017921175,0.0015878539,0.0036167696,0.023886265,0.039804317,0.07186911,0.020031808,0.007286066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031609583,0.0009998747,0.006180392,0.0011662333,0.00016744343,0.0023255523,0.10744548,0.0015630592,0.0044562058,0.34116158,0.2842685,0.24994954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012120849,0.00018652876,0.0017616947,0.001656821,0.000025320738,0.0005753973,0.085071184,0.0016709497,0.0007017583,0.20465195,0.7034473,0.00012989558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010830595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018933961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14892414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013819791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14058274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78759557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390024953","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v16i1.8695","title":"Inciting Change Makers in an Online Community Engaged Learning Environment During Pandemic Restrictions: Lessons from a Disability Studies and Community Rehabilitation Program","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Disability Education and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mentorship; Context (archaeology); Community engagement; Medical education; Online community; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.5959108086592899,"score_gpt":0.5424592641679227,"score_spread":0.05345154449136724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390024953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7477748,0.0016190651,0.010383481,0.11971991,0.0019943006,0.0022680862,0.00009732081,0.00041505336,0.115727976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91735303,0.00378579,0.030699436,0.0155463815,0.00047094387,0.0015732346,0.00014894806,0.00016624441,0.030255966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375385,0.004357736,0.000096641044,0.00017423497,0.0005522768,0.0010652696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915747,0.0035680567,0.00023605826,0.00033717405,0.00052223436,0.0037617336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007869645,0.0006355479,0.00037224588,0.0006897877,0.012212767,0.004784788,0.003257891,0.0031243241,0.0044927546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010204054,0.0003340072,0.0006351598,0.000581953,0.0060260915,0.004325756,0.011191315,0.0056885793,0.00087585655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015875096,0.011577004,0.006272681,0.0009850307,0.000031000596,0.0062657483,0.47732246,0.0012161782,0.0022335802,0.02152909,0.09027632,0.38213223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001811652,0.0024471756,0.007098761,0.0009870275,0.000029104316,0.0013760828,0.7002857,0.0013081316,0.0019704117,0.011685532,0.2725177,0.00011322128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062275687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031395774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012212767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003758296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010778048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04161918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400344356","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v17i1.9043","title":"Partnering with older adults for digital research tool development: Demystifying an engaged research process","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Process management; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.31834468998899484,"score_gpt":0.5116489580342067,"score_spread":0.1933042680452119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400344356","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25958577,0.013388811,0.27985692,0.37836766,0.0032961816,0.0053891498,0.0001237212,0.0011687003,0.058823124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8314081,0.0056277206,0.1379979,0.015147433,0.00057832303,0.003586702,0.00007179183,0.00021626764,0.0053659463],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6310112,0.32541764,0.011718886,0.008286641,0.017775157,0.005790492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63834566,0.2459891,0.021330072,0.045890126,0.025139522,0.023305519],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33826822,0.0012223206,0.0012481,0.0057961615,0.024976475,0.029805437,0.005919823,0.008040909,0.0030280882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28366107,0.0020358195,0.001792725,0.0021242625,0.046823986,0.04472353,0.053809427,0.015917383,0.0010744894],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007112303,0.00032852692,0.0046004397,0.000791819,0.00004283052,0.00073763705,0.7756436,0.0002023224,0.0011635766,0.07997243,0.0029315555,0.13351405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012929951,0.0008117051,0.004252633,0.0048814975,0.00010141925,0.0017291192,0.6127397,0.0014014911,0.0015757374,0.20385928,0.16831143,0.0002066616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042256243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005899757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6617318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009367658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060896542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8160331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407037588","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v18i1.9204","title":"Reflections on multimodality: Making the most of Kairotic moments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; Concordia University; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Multimodality; Temporality; Set (abstract data type); Action (physics); Psychology; Sociology; Process (computing); Nature versus nurture; Embodied cognition; Extant taxon; Gesture; Dementia; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Cognitive science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5235015950626245,"score_gpt":0.6256994173569888,"score_spread":0.10219782229436425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407037588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63272023,0.006099079,0.04936956,0.06920001,0.0036400615,0.0007126313,0.00025314742,0.00058557885,0.23741971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98019195,0.001124909,0.005398291,0.0020011498,0.00031243134,0.00022053305,0.000040601382,0.00021315782,0.010496921],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803931,0.015798789,0.00035893996,0.00076615706,0.0013009375,0.001382099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986086,0.008961292,0.0010390098,0.0011891001,0.001014522,0.0017099876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0139383655,0.0011331096,0.0007173141,0.0020195616,0.01874406,0.013328495,0.0023741901,0.003745657,0.00492498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0327303,0.0006738286,0.0008856264,0.0010748755,0.034566797,0.014122886,0.017104538,0.007858695,0.00088197965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036153913,0.00002185647,0.00033230003,0.00011360304,0.0000050492768,0.000963126,0.967042,0.000053326083,0.00088153593,0.023590866,0.0015944927,0.0053656707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007042042,0.00003936285,0.0005864019,0.00032501126,0.000008593338,0.00077962055,0.89488995,0.000092398186,0.0007207053,0.009514454,0.092997946,0.000038603128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001975447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036669264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01874406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040800925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025602437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07371402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407037868","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v18i1.9326","title":"Resisting scientific extractivism: A post-extractivist policy of knowledge production with marginalized communities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Sociology; Accountability; Negotiation; Citizen journalism; Context (archaeology); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Knowledge production; Epistemic community; Public relations; Economic Justice; Environmental ethics; Political science; Social science; Law; Knowledge management; Politics","score_opus":0.10285725373780806,"score_gpt":0.3726999817559034,"score_spread":0.26984272801809533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407037868","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23421685,0.0046521844,0.23147698,0.2834385,0.0010975292,0.00093843165,0.000060851155,0.00042258977,0.24369611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671181,0.00042118962,0.012849662,0.006904127,0.0002595255,0.0006795332,0.000018822784,0.00013656366,0.01161249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8839185,0.08164451,0.003182217,0.011413447,0.013939647,0.005901633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8055095,0.12904197,0.0145077165,0.032371033,0.012473826,0.006095989],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15034626,0.00091549556,0.0013587115,0.0036190571,0.02382914,0.026507027,0.0050987825,0.011542068,0.004569559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13810703,0.0010299977,0.0015054223,0.0023743752,0.13154005,0.030311383,0.046504334,0.015349197,0.0011399286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006678992,0.00004925982,0.00090969825,0.00014679167,0.00002472967,0.00023298571,0.117406055,0.00032993936,0.0006671229,0.8643078,0.0014098635,0.014448867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005839883,0.00010622522,0.00048628138,0.0003875892,0.000019139996,0.00024785503,0.032382563,0.0010132173,0.0013834978,0.85083747,0.11303123,0.00004656103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027522303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019400248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97617084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013912175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028669868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79511654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407037871","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v18i1.9579","title":"Writing research differently","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustenance; CLARITY; Cohesion (chemistry); Sociology; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Futures contract; Semiotics; Order (exchange); Computer science; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.31778155388950574,"score_gpt":0.48512936960495284,"score_spread":0.1673478157154471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407037871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08683335,0.01617136,0.12882024,0.31125748,0.069897294,0.00074078987,0.00045433806,0.0010045919,0.38482052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6011711,0.010242943,0.06284241,0.09755093,0.020325668,0.0012796867,0.0008879572,0.00331157,0.2023878],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8740997,0.09111641,0.006347691,0.008962118,0.015660044,0.0038140249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8399913,0.09957665,0.0075814,0.029422544,0.017138056,0.006290109],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05920927,0.0015498357,0.0017415399,0.004777516,0.012488987,0.03768278,0.004033114,0.008403933,0.014757629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13634446,0.001155724,0.0017134177,0.0040798564,0.032809373,0.04084931,0.019941155,0.017196063,0.008374376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009661109,0.000100903904,0.0005182453,0.00070965214,0.00009193874,0.00029725817,0.54399645,0.00027458678,0.0022176506,0.36069235,0.03705863,0.053945817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035748068,0.000090626905,0.00021331912,0.0015333621,0.00005474591,0.00044691708,0.19691922,0.0004184252,0.0014621505,0.13536751,0.66336393,0.000093958966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078932766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012426504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9407907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045534456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008949205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3131323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412809898","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v18i2.9405","title":"Youth knowledge mobilization: Reflections on theory and practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilization; Business; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Knowledge management; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.2878330563888806,"score_gpt":0.4711906353701397,"score_spread":0.1833575789812591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412809898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29236147,0.07718772,0.049866963,0.23953831,0.0030980671,0.0009045222,0.00024001831,0.00040025968,0.3364027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94742787,0.018100247,0.012039835,0.008491675,0.00030538632,0.00055443426,0.00007165691,0.00021509963,0.012793733],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95338297,0.036325753,0.0011793096,0.0020036506,0.0028771292,0.004231256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9587294,0.032370765,0.001230822,0.0014923002,0.003073487,0.0031032432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055354144,0.0009976759,0.0012852858,0.0053281425,0.026146717,0.029358137,0.005068595,0.0068531833,0.004447071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028661856,0.0008772555,0.0011230846,0.006175532,0.07380952,0.022208715,0.029348075,0.01124067,0.0007417164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024049325,0.000051249575,0.0010200359,0.00034130478,0.00000806028,0.00063746044,0.81791,0.00010482209,0.00010252227,0.15454479,0.003396318,0.021859307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000158836,0.00003259616,0.00072369794,0.0022836204,0.000011492405,0.0003218138,0.77019596,0.00028471331,0.0003912246,0.04304484,0.18266574,0.000028428545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07416434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074375555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07416434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05635449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05348111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40888238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}