{"meta":{"query_hash":"7fa3dd32c312","filters":{"venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement"},"cohort_total":52,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":52,"exported":52,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7fa3dd32c312","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Gateways+International+Journal+of+Community+Research+and+Engagement"},"results":[{"id":"W1964362202","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v6i1.3257","title":"Community-based research decision-making: Experiences and factors affecting participation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Corporate governance; Public relations; Public participation; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.8846643334021607,"score_gpt":0.7378253477347129,"score_spread":0.1468389856674478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964362202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910591,0.000029153576,0.0007620721,0.0059486656,0.00034836223,0.00056595774,0.0000065305862,0.000014226346,0.0012658908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696946,0.000085987616,0.0014222796,0.0012177189,0.00013491318,0.000109246736,0.0000045887627,0.000011270271,0.00004451918],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683075,0.02791637,0.0008990794,0.000097343356,0.0020810233,0.0006986731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509733,0.044241123,0.0003305963,0.0003241512,0.0037431114,0.00038776555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.060687326,0.00011478798,0.00021259354,0.0009841917,0.0077459035,0.00024417747,0.0010440766,0.00008046358,0.0007496537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019818798,0.000090772744,0.000032081192,0.00048529275,0.00065173337,0.0006592604,0.0010151364,0.0063552503,0.000031155952],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027889997,0.00046592954,0.14888957,0.0002138396,0.00008175564,0.000006757582,0.78718513,0.000055008113,0.0011618925,0.00064431835,0.024416767,0.03660013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011435729,0.0009896829,0.26206633,0.0006072122,0.000003227271,0.0000040990963,0.71359915,0.00025273947,0.00037613866,0.0117717795,0.009081092,0.0001049629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025005408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035578056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113176756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039560333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004957486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975266931","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v3i0.1039","title":"Participatory action research approaches and methods","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Energy Training","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Action (physics); Citizen journalism; Action research; Section (typography); Process (computing); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Anthropology; Pedagogy; World Wide Web; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9619735185795929,"score_gpt":0.7695658100278313,"score_spread":0.1924077085517616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975266931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98239857,0.00023711855,0.0011212619,0.004285438,0.00050561107,0.00021813142,0.0000024038711,0.000013251172,0.011218194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98540825,0.0011298347,0.012595503,0.000035631474,0.00048000005,0.000030470077,0.0000011461088,0.000011710653,0.00030743395],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95129734,0.044719778,0.00041864632,0.00012904416,0.002742638,0.00069254934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876391,0.009111187,0.00011369758,0.00027320773,0.0022576782,0.0006051124],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20964757,0.00009297523,0.00018878908,0.0007788913,0.003017812,0.00048438236,0.0010747828,0.000117692114,0.0002012734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02213947,0.000082925915,0.000047913632,0.00039220962,0.002742536,0.00055058685,0.0008420517,0.0068893447,0.000008531571],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066440884,0.0012454619,0.010581252,0.00006884625,0.0003763631,0.000042604795,0.12404901,0.0000075624425,0.05713889,0.11707476,0.0033444078,0.68540645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015473767,0.0014237431,0.052278183,0.00012016891,0.000021808639,0.000038376344,0.25188643,0.0003517824,0.025155898,0.20217466,0.46471933,0.00028223553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010626077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011223245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6851242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019996522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005273763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977156883","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3395","title":"Engaging evaluation research: Reflecting on the process of sexual assault/domestic violence protocol evaluation research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Scholarship; Sociology; Sexual assault; Theme (computing); Community engagement; Domestic violence; Protocol (science); Engaged scholarship; Public relations; Community-based participatory research; Psychology; Participatory action research; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.8815832168568917,"score_gpt":0.7376941228375049,"score_spread":0.14388909401938677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977156883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685056,0.00003158541,0.00039075868,0.005759019,0.00023791046,0.010455622,0.0000041674925,0.0000069933994,0.014608337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953633,0.000038231814,0.00020180971,0.000083808256,0.00028304875,0.003919999,0.0000068318222,0.00001264385,0.0000903184],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8719662,0.088403106,0.0017500345,0.00034440338,0.03684025,0.0006960202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.923584,0.033780526,0.00065366516,0.0008506818,0.040944584,0.00018655107],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6078596,0.00014594237,0.0002642212,0.0020171835,0.002983216,0.00073031045,0.0028544033,0.000087214255,0.0007763185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11400509,0.000091873924,0.000051842144,0.0015866521,0.00075098424,0.0006434149,0.00077587436,0.0063212,0.000049290626],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001592303,0.0015112248,0.004757839,0.000120257224,0.0002038946,0.0000040630025,0.031149741,0.011520485,0.008398678,0.010037079,0.006098957,0.9246055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049946834,0.008075362,0.03215668,0.0015605163,0.000033938926,0.000042821408,0.19257016,0.14483094,0.014228854,0.59132314,0.009906497,0.00027642853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014445436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000107030086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92432904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000630668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015325944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984275600","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v6i1.2822","title":"Building equitable community-academic research collaborations: Learning together through tensions and contradictions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"General partnership; Ambivalence; Reflexivity; Public relations; Alliance; Focus group; Sociology; Stakeholder; Process (computing); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.4090382142354676,"score_gpt":0.5037369855164683,"score_spread":0.09469877128100068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984275600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563524,0.0010837718,0.00067989156,0.016537918,0.00026845137,0.00040557826,0.000004614644,0.000043653235,0.02462373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885345,0.0077215936,0.0022142124,0.00028385915,0.00023947017,0.00004958967,0.000008833726,0.000019057126,0.0009288994],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96620977,0.030759389,0.0005030747,0.00009500356,0.001770074,0.00066268374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98602915,0.008598312,0.00018141372,0.00034037963,0.004555766,0.00029499136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049994554,0.00013383341,0.00023113421,0.0006218186,0.01661212,0.00081625517,0.0014875304,0.0001353342,0.000315181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056990026,0.00012809837,0.00004880312,0.0007268102,0.0011722147,0.0009931956,0.0014583819,0.013710614,0.00002567599],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027246904,0.0016981593,0.011595813,0.00010421584,0.0010018233,0.000022993687,0.6491591,0.000979548,0.012213205,0.23161286,0.030159907,0.061179955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008757463,0.00067907694,0.0057289884,0.00030292085,0.000015738282,0.000017224524,0.6882706,0.00010332305,0.00018322881,0.06948978,0.2341883,0.00014503406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025970055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001442622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2040284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038652483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033326933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984840671","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3393","title":"The Article Idea Chart: A participatory action research tool to aid involvement in dissemination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Stakeholder; Action research; Process (computing); Public relations; Action (physics); Community-based participatory research; Dissemination; Chart; Knowledge management; Political science; Engineering ethics; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.5418725648488457,"score_gpt":0.6088463977587408,"score_spread":0.06697383290989511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984840671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97243243,0.0001090688,0.0002521793,0.023932042,0.00050627586,0.0006559306,0.0000026025125,0.000009763979,0.0020997173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972653,0.000899269,0.00025865796,0.00068361685,0.00023877305,0.00020046101,0.000006384896,0.000011268293,0.00043631473],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809156,0.015621519,0.0008880799,0.00009216104,0.0017550316,0.0007276171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98754823,0.009295887,0.00016349708,0.00040525344,0.0022733398,0.00031381444],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08297874,0.00009713942,0.00017023213,0.0006658029,0.0042540315,0.00011330689,0.000907507,0.000069739246,0.00009403302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073778136,0.00007290784,0.00003227323,0.00043955687,0.00017421783,0.0002232711,0.0011253287,0.0054049664,0.00008480068],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003936039,0.0020231965,0.1069812,0.00039189708,0.0002006403,0.000020868936,0.22361161,0.000119686585,0.0052604307,0.030619107,0.08256688,0.5442684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023866594,0.0013994124,0.42874643,0.0009898687,0.0000046410887,0.000004892172,0.17228909,0.00044665352,0.001162561,0.039982233,0.35242012,0.0001674323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073680887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004011697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.544101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009592623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040636986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991169346","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3400","title":"Engaging Canadian youth in conversations: Using knowledge exchange in school-based health promotion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Youth Development and Social Support","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Health promotion; Psychological intervention; Overweight; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Youth participation; Positive Youth Development; Focus group; Gerontology; Medicine; Medical education; Obesity; Public relations; Developmental psychology; Public health; Political science; Nursing; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.39253351072380827,"score_gpt":0.47544127518887536,"score_spread":0.08290776446506709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991169346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850425,0.000116056166,0.00018699806,0.005124416,0.00029054828,0.0001986921,0.0000047134495,0.000005090325,0.009030996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999006,0.00030069996,0.00031721976,0.00014937068,0.00014573534,0.0000037544685,0.000016958385,0.0000054779566,0.000054793516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99283427,0.005755222,0.00035249404,0.000058711666,0.00063902343,0.00036027326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985985,0.00036344922,0.000108836386,0.000072872026,0.0005476065,0.0003087187],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030496707,0.00006355061,0.00013677248,0.0010764013,0.0011655099,0.00014334651,0.0004293592,0.000050419505,0.00010631119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013179891,0.0000677927,0.00002605535,0.00035697847,0.00016520196,0.00027323788,0.00008631594,0.0014032301,0.000004072634],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007306207,0.00057371863,0.49432093,0.00006262118,0.00004378499,0.000014705322,0.4696181,0.00012767466,0.000017198696,0.0036000833,0.00025991368,0.03128819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005719835,0.0007579844,0.38096008,0.001687518,0.000010891588,0.0000029180526,0.5674854,0.001430117,0.00007295505,0.014444329,0.026997395,0.000430593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.235516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5237554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2882394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018265836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021495016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99830765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994881547","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3390","title":"Access to health services in Western Newfoundland, Canada: Issues, barriers and recommendations emerging from a community-engaged research project","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Global Health Workforce Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Newfoundland and Labrador; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Telehealth; General partnership; Government (linguistics); Rural area; Business; Health care; Medicine; Public relations; Nursing; Political science; Telemedicine","score_opus":0.29864917563849164,"score_gpt":0.5668298150896817,"score_spread":0.26818063945119003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994881547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398129,0.0005149011,0.00005751394,0.056748975,0.0005324909,0.00088925456,0.00008509266,0.00001567605,0.0013431931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99243414,0.0028441513,0.0006031059,0.0032902046,0.00029554352,0.00007503995,0.00008882976,0.000025432093,0.0003435205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8954284,0.10094709,0.0010469197,0.0001532355,0.0015383566,0.00088598125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776666,0.018929286,0.00032307173,0.00050588895,0.0018545163,0.00072063226],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09302544,0.00018550247,0.00045704437,0.0010553245,0.0121564735,0.00025458587,0.0019543427,0.00009992855,0.00013824295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056901127,0.00017167862,0.000026662712,0.0006472267,0.00016510957,0.0005003184,0.002465617,0.021286895,0.000006894827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011356509,0.00039583998,0.52884424,0.0007411433,0.00022369939,0.000021274953,0.37823904,0.000091876434,0.000060269504,0.0005320875,0.06075336,0.028961498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016576381,0.0007312123,0.16332632,0.0037247317,0.000004214482,0.0000057732427,0.45109016,0.0001090492,0.000008997326,0.0035601342,0.37563518,0.00014659177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9319991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9694114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36551794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018786386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001972846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98912954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999200618","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v1i0.509","title":"Government Support and Infrastructure: Realizing the value of collaborative work","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Government (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Public relations; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Work (physics); Knowledge management; Business; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.612342354023746,"score_gpt":0.6423381165050858,"score_spread":0.029995762481339727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999200618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766545,0.000064333755,0.00018888472,0.015928285,0.00022657997,0.00032649748,0.000047962516,0.0000035964958,0.0065593487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950413,0.0016587576,0.00093354913,0.0020552573,0.00012970291,0.00001606686,0.0000023261662,0.0000060761827,0.000156963],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906503,0.0065003107,0.000753308,0.000060872622,0.0017253499,0.00030985023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99212927,0.0055627995,0.00046925255,0.00019764599,0.0014583187,0.0001827027],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018062562,0.0000772805,0.00017283959,0.00014395975,0.0022473529,0.000023611792,0.0006344564,0.000040866107,0.00016644281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003002851,0.00005232028,0.000022603755,0.0003230433,0.0005516911,0.00019892008,0.0006857298,0.002156416,0.0000036975334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001276059,0.00026053243,0.28550917,0.000218419,0.00047029357,0.000046044082,0.47877085,0.0001191011,0.0017103491,0.033386298,0.18127687,0.016956022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020507434,0.00087046967,0.63361335,0.00022495908,0.000009520812,0.000052205858,0.17024589,0.000017997794,0.0005573979,0.0067355204,0.18553062,0.00009132579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003013143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049432103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34810418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030419393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006725723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027027889","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3389","title":"University and community partnerships in South Sulawesi, Indonesia: Enhancing community capacity and promoting democratic governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Public Administration in Developing Nations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Mindset; Islam; General partnership; Political science; Public relations; Capacity building; Population; Corporate governance; Civil society; Sociology; Economic growth; Management; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.24505143869303814,"score_gpt":0.39258411427266,"score_spread":0.14753267557962185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027027889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911587,0.000036478294,0.00076937577,0.0042608995,0.00008333297,0.00014984161,0.000007728504,0.000013157816,0.0035204887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865913,0.0002483975,0.0008788958,0.0000664085,0.000059676702,0.0000020610803,0.0000045103625,0.0000058575324,0.00007504074],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766418,0.021831332,0.00037095236,0.000067757945,0.00080712326,0.0002810564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932111,0.0052162507,0.00026576556,0.00020630046,0.0008858063,0.0002148106],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039908025,0.0001022056,0.00019543899,0.00029660674,0.0048814216,0.00027491027,0.00084819185,0.00008294611,0.000010561962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007880058,0.000109363595,0.00002404891,0.00032222364,0.0009768845,0.00061115413,0.0006378164,0.00482711,6.943449e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027269972,0.0012533511,0.2089223,0.00023008852,0.00021802691,0.00001925545,0.6379696,0.00002312398,0.00054213306,0.13860153,0.0003307875,0.011617073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025441607,0.0007919255,0.57347035,0.0006277522,0.000018131435,0.000038703318,0.34937698,0.00029098487,0.0004112186,0.0673004,0.004824809,0.0003045755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002879993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01490172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36454806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003650728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028612587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99746877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027883192","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v4i0.1758","title":"It’s the Basement Stories, not the Belt: Lessons from a community-university knowledge mobilisation collaboration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Panacea (medicine); General partnership; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.4249726496933522,"score_gpt":0.45371061435133536,"score_spread":0.028737964657983173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027883192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9211799,0.00017556598,0.00039431796,0.040779535,0.0006246265,0.00033237835,0.000029780877,0.00002336528,0.036460526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965925,0.0018046018,0.00022722581,0.00052673614,0.00020087222,0.0000079946785,0.000029978513,0.000008558394,0.0006015101],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96563905,0.032551296,0.00031346385,0.00006554064,0.0011669802,0.00026364345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917776,0.005190442,0.00024188703,0.00053442665,0.0021226353,0.0001329912],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03579711,0.00011411048,0.00014232282,0.00020710852,0.010733175,0.00031135578,0.002723827,0.00006595033,0.0002808749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012518433,0.00008236471,0.000066784654,0.0004183577,0.0008150893,0.00040272856,0.0010652521,0.0044232276,0.000012826006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038547252,0.0009655702,0.0011120765,0.0000094053075,0.00036306016,0.0000052440673,0.9494598,0.000031462434,0.00011479398,0.020913832,0.009438941,0.017200366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052181096,0.00027145777,0.015789859,0.000061580526,0.000027458522,0.000001232728,0.7129164,0.000027991275,0.00018832125,0.004099243,0.26602304,0.00007163945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06592076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074666634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2565841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055731676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041341755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029108715","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v6i1.3219","title":"Needs and readiness assessments: Tools for promoting community-university engagement with Aboriginal communities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Bureau of Land Management","keywords":"Community-based participatory research; Community engagement; Participatory action research; General partnership; Needs assessment; Public relations; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Medical education; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.345438752262245,"score_gpt":0.5294459146944093,"score_spread":0.18400716243216425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029108715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985842,0.000088737,0.001492079,0.005722592,0.00025192156,0.0014256152,0.000034233144,0.000029555686,0.0051132664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905885,0.0015012359,0.006417184,0.0007053454,0.0001250669,0.00009575783,0.00008832298,0.000024107301,0.00045447936],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838506,0.013874582,0.00068993174,0.00007015671,0.0008839024,0.0006308215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982909,0.012022061,0.0004177639,0.0004885482,0.0037661393,0.0003964419],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022011388,0.00021363112,0.00038136297,0.00081173296,0.0088583175,0.0002668044,0.001336122,0.00010434113,0.00019378644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000708713,0.00018017176,0.000046547877,0.0002942876,0.00042025576,0.0010370961,0.0012652407,0.008011827,0.000009009582],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052560274,0.004026515,0.11656367,0.0034737173,0.0022277227,0.000041205356,0.60016274,0.000039671755,0.0010355108,0.026080351,0.025504105,0.21558876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049280077,0.002585673,0.067995176,0.0012544052,0.000033778495,0.000034097953,0.7678979,0.00014509562,0.00005542787,0.006062255,0.14876257,0.00024563132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072733737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016071934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21534313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057559577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000730633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057471842","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v3i0.1328","title":"A framework for entry: PAR values and engagement strategies in community research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Community Based Research","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Community engagement; Community-based participatory research; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Action research; Action (physics); Diversity (politics); Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.4635515733552064,"score_gpt":0.6045201911721675,"score_spread":0.14096861781696107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057471842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818319,0.0003343021,0.0006314827,0.009921512,0.0008202349,0.0011901753,0.000027717742,0.000019293831,0.0052233534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856618,0.003071494,0.0099945795,0.00050440273,0.00034249967,0.00020562822,0.0000309626,0.000024288953,0.00016433209],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96717274,0.029162299,0.0010800242,0.0001288646,0.0014931278,0.00096294924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9638555,0.0318458,0.00027495276,0.0006500626,0.0029053905,0.00046828933],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10528607,0.00019593301,0.0003931358,0.0011522993,0.008880798,0.00023051644,0.0016144282,0.00024249093,0.00020963338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012115346,0.00017312143,0.000058031696,0.00037524206,0.00068898767,0.00039025437,0.0024416747,0.033052035,0.000011602263],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056908005,0.0054132654,0.08821867,0.0024579014,0.000681708,0.00006464953,0.5708714,0.00002826148,0.003284003,0.19885519,0.037595782,0.086838335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002658279,0.0012370542,0.0949244,0.00088673143,0.000006872128,0.000012224306,0.3380843,0.000042015414,0.00015792258,0.5175072,0.044323083,0.00015990576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002958042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040620593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.318652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039124672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012432385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99620605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065017426","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3394","title":"Using simulation to educate police about mental illness: A collaborative initiative","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental illness; Mental health; General partnership; Psychology; Perception; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.3559135457385248,"score_gpt":0.5513783477894265,"score_spread":0.19546480205090172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065017426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989414,0.000080340295,0.0017863964,0.0063571804,0.00060398347,0.0004200551,0.000021173724,0.000010076641,0.001306791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953165,0.000082535524,0.002723934,0.0012074877,0.0005560674,0.000013231674,0.000035973815,0.000016426919,0.000047853475],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591094,0.0021886856,0.00049498753,0.0000923008,0.0010702353,0.00024283357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99163866,0.0020454235,0.00021171708,0.0002177673,0.0055324556,0.0003540034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051472895,0.00011667104,0.00021455258,0.0007622096,0.00082111603,0.000112599344,0.00029495545,0.000051361443,0.00013365885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001209205,0.00010746222,0.000044797158,0.00042776365,0.00014150025,0.00024871223,0.00018610526,0.0012622954,0.000011992941],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063917143,0.0033734648,0.12638257,0.000385369,0.0014098078,0.00001791103,0.7304713,0.055633184,0.00716852,0.0037048107,0.0071147745,0.05794655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009772023,0.006584414,0.37694448,0.0025268942,0.0001213295,0.00019524505,0.50639373,0.02740972,0.009575468,0.010320095,0.049481533,0.0006750608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067036506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003880469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2505619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006969873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060515443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6315444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067029069","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3397","title":"The Farm to Fork project: Community-engaged scholarship from community partners' perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Indigenous and Place-Based Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Scholarship; Fork (system call); Engaged scholarship; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Community engagement; Community organization; Sustainability; Sustainable community; Sociology; Political science; Business; Sustainable development; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.31262712583614083,"score_gpt":0.5057443712480044,"score_spread":0.1931172454118636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067029069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96205086,0.00013266709,0.0003142638,0.009712665,0.000577211,0.00038993472,0.000021979376,0.000019413119,0.02678104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764115,0.00054989825,0.00040443378,0.0004836506,0.0005144475,0.000022664426,0.000024172883,0.000013268024,0.00034632647],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9005867,0.09710963,0.00038046672,0.00006627402,0.0013906745,0.00046620474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719999,0.023952767,0.00020530829,0.00052975304,0.0030408571,0.0002714577],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13332258,0.0001344254,0.00018736656,0.00032705883,0.037064664,0.0009308921,0.0025621147,0.00008850012,0.000048326176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021002673,0.00010629515,0.000084249106,0.00034167396,0.0006418251,0.00029949733,0.00056610646,0.01637263,0.00001897223],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005705726,0.0009153246,0.002965776,0.000010067734,0.00027753806,0.0000021109101,0.93546844,0.000028915842,0.00029138953,0.02587272,0.0036179135,0.029979223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005966948,0.0007475173,0.011033485,0.00010380223,0.000012583426,0.0000028521304,0.77304447,0.0000065399,0.00041735225,0.0930919,0.12082616,0.00011666929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11180009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059109055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.162424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012008321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009528359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98724383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067149601","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v4i0.1780","title":"Collaboration, Participation and Technology: The San Joaquin Valley Cumulative Health Impacts Project","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Environmental justice; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Sociology; Public participation; Community design; Constructive; Interdependence; Participatory GIS; Community-based participatory research; Knowledge management; Political science; Process (computing); Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.4819062346268573,"score_gpt":0.5812845814256687,"score_spread":0.09937834679881147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067149601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9632757,0.00077790197,0.00016010167,0.031103915,0.00031412294,0.0009547465,0.000012938939,0.000021533664,0.0033790986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946638,0.0028699818,0.0010942679,0.0010679847,0.000089780086,0.00007149915,0.0000113848655,0.000010268321,0.000121030505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902938,0.007690732,0.00077227125,0.00007307298,0.0007245975,0.00044551268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942865,0.002153493,0.00044508706,0.00029372424,0.002596206,0.00022501843],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019026073,0.00011266905,0.00021533543,0.0006268186,0.003964101,0.000056423716,0.00060558884,0.00008229544,0.00013225806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031034031,0.000077366654,0.000020227097,0.00050139904,0.00031516657,0.00027374984,0.0007775075,0.0037059123,0.000008832906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017959316,0.0012810719,0.11314379,0.00039804925,0.00056796375,0.000017503577,0.71819,0.000006263926,0.00020907981,0.022941599,0.0699756,0.07147312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031519544,0.0033155226,0.4348786,0.0010618774,0.00001732557,0.00002659917,0.44648814,0.000099274424,0.00023723597,0.055430867,0.055084266,0.00020835671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027728954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039981743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32173482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039778074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014886295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99859256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081344121","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3486","title":"Breathing life into theory: Illustrations of community-based research – Hallmarks, functions and phases","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Community Based Research","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Sociology; Democracy; Academic community; Social research; Management science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.6795361468120121,"score_gpt":0.5615123449395514,"score_spread":0.11802380187246075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081344121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98162776,0.0002790572,0.0025305029,0.0041723046,0.0004118472,0.00050801365,0.00004838865,0.000012844583,0.010409253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970634,0.00050156505,0.0007640594,0.0009016563,0.00021785268,0.000048693568,0.00015404126,0.000014432201,0.00033428217],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96779484,0.029263739,0.00092329393,0.000081373735,0.0014650797,0.00047170566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814293,0.014462809,0.00033759463,0.00041180814,0.002893355,0.0004651528],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06137231,0.00013282645,0.00028085153,0.00085794914,0.005969804,0.000062187355,0.0007762435,0.00010656119,0.00026844713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027590469,0.000112196496,0.000056295896,0.00028070912,0.0007300766,0.00024398479,0.00075012364,0.006797501,0.000009606613],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0119264955,0.015101257,0.1271311,0.009275502,0.0020496375,0.000029497693,0.37885544,0.00067963806,0.0077770744,0.15993772,0.08716924,0.20006739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012031346,0.013305013,0.024945812,0.0056406604,0.00007969028,0.000023048931,0.5870728,0.0008357044,0.0013918531,0.19206412,0.16215344,0.00045655345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035180214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086088874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20821731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002759493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005658042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094167406","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v7i1.3392","title":"Communities of knowledge and knowledge of communities: An appreciative inquiry into rural wellbeing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appreciative inquiry; Rural community; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Participatory action research; Value (mathematics); Pedagogy; Political science; Computer science; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.16513268228625094,"score_gpt":0.38562656311813426,"score_spread":0.22049388083188332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094167406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925853,0.00045362508,0.0013021317,0.00023776157,0.0003143396,0.00012614993,0.0000060948637,0.000010818737,0.0049637817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981953,0.00053861487,0.0003373966,0.000091436545,0.00071982294,0.000005260538,0.00006267026,0.0000195241,0.00003001163],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996945,0.001680396,0.00060261623,0.000051790426,0.0005152324,0.00020493394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938808,0.0020633235,0.00048595437,0.0002680911,0.0032578406,0.000043990694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008601956,0.00016204732,0.00035336218,0.0008432725,0.0008362392,0.00014271402,0.0011214373,0.00006823939,0.00009274607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045295066,0.00014693532,0.000056860354,0.00032607492,0.0010158564,0.0011742737,0.0016150889,0.001288764,0.0000042498905],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011067928,0.0034790784,0.118540965,0.001487821,0.0009713152,0.0000024385108,0.68409216,0.00022875945,0.002752076,0.14189395,0.0022894477,0.04315517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00301571,0.0011113336,0.09053034,0.0013441035,0.00006990547,0.000014018804,0.79208905,0.0028251468,0.0019769813,0.08502024,0.021624256,0.00037892978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00158767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012100671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10799686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007187712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057881753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.643176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115278257","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v8i1.3936","title":"Shifting the evaluative gaze: Community-based program evaluation in the homeless sector","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Participatory action research; Public relations; Community development; Participatory evaluation; Citizen journalism; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Housing First; Economic growth; Political science; Psychology; Mental health; Social science","score_opus":0.6728354869410879,"score_gpt":0.6143010548367264,"score_spread":0.05853443210436149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115278257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881205,0.00031735474,0.00007412262,0.005155194,0.0003673614,0.0012779069,0.0000082194565,0.000010740068,0.0046685985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987263,0.00012805319,0.0001439722,0.00030952774,0.0003005656,0.00032917524,0.00003318149,0.000011533893,0.000017707587],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93248814,0.064092785,0.00058274384,0.000054540105,0.0024294208,0.00035234753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98753303,0.0076445737,0.00029696937,0.00034392506,0.0040673823,0.00011413603],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12608542,0.00011252944,0.0002599711,0.0002807897,0.003083322,0.0001555442,0.0015767325,0.00008089882,0.00008164904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042732256,0.00006467778,0.0000545051,0.00038466012,0.00032382278,0.0002017523,0.0004567993,0.0076661827,0.000010869362],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005856086,0.0015996264,0.034659933,0.00009637763,0.00019011361,0.000012266764,0.8450376,0.00046003138,0.000042158365,0.002497492,0.000993314,0.113825515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002720477,0.0007993231,0.07264416,0.00035843355,0.00001890193,0.0000010057686,0.896824,0.0009780744,0.00003302255,0.018502528,0.0070412457,0.0000788492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027022355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062614297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12181219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052895036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077962095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99821454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165189542","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v8i1.3676","title":"Simulation as a tool for developing knowledge mobilisation strategies: Innovative knowledge transfer in youth services","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Interprofessional Education and Collaboration","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Knowledge transfer; Best practice; Knowledge management; Software deployment; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Process (computing); Service provider; Service (business); Public relations; Medical education; Business; Nursing; Computer science; Medicine; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.39771198171949795,"score_gpt":0.580945568686916,"score_spread":0.1832335869674181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165189542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816706,0.0001382545,0.010357529,0.0015032279,0.0011245874,0.0007195137,0.0000226225,0.000011977135,0.00445165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810904,0.00006775655,0.0007217893,0.00023953468,0.00031388807,0.0000979801,0.00012098057,0.000013799386,0.0003152536],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944929,0.0038169061,0.0007937076,0.00009424487,0.00053684966,0.0002653886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873202,0.0027122947,0.00017337625,0.0001319353,0.009566094,0.00009612278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013132265,0.00011911388,0.00019354912,0.00071176013,0.00077635713,0.000089377565,0.00043520762,0.00011393286,0.000043926415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014642266,0.000103080536,0.000030354116,0.0005547419,0.000080508325,0.0007185279,0.00017642952,0.0017430733,0.000022373695],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037554607,0.00112507,0.005287619,0.00039806243,0.00018276063,0.0000022489205,0.92379814,0.0019861476,0.00070907664,0.052665424,0.0010374578,0.009052511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046803653,0.00089098443,0.013346316,0.0013988541,0.000010463488,0.0000017986036,0.921351,0.0030575516,0.00035426326,0.041061014,0.013657068,0.00019032927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031932563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009950838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01643838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083072286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034688956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75728834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518918535","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v9i1.4802","title":"'Culture' as HIV prevention: Indigenous youth speak up!","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; University of Victoria; York University; Native Youth Sexual Health Network; McMaster University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Youth empowerment; Positive Youth Development; Empowerment; Resistance (ecology); Youth studies; Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology; Political science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.16031476990104193,"score_gpt":0.4450391758461417,"score_spread":0.2847244059450998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518918535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8907781,0.00029467494,0.00024013418,0.0027097242,0.0009377079,0.00026676786,0.000013552805,0.0000139996855,0.10474533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94939,0.02291403,0.00019169626,0.000048055903,0.00093566964,0.0000016411341,0.000010400084,0.000008476218,0.026500061],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939832,0.0037169303,0.00038618996,0.00007801953,0.0014203753,0.0004152638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969312,0.0005165235,0.00020273849,0.0001840611,0.0018732803,0.0002922256],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012943576,0.00009110743,0.00013969738,0.00032530338,0.0074742823,0.00019473108,0.0009828084,0.000079914054,0.00042677543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016284415,0.000058216967,0.000070284485,0.00015800627,0.00046918928,0.00042528083,0.00002803802,0.0010498533,0.00007826798],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016471924,0.0006819686,0.0007123558,0.000013354269,0.000150369,0.00001118897,0.9391476,7.1021196e-7,0.00003448586,0.047752924,0.0014313159,0.009899016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009845906,0.00081591983,0.0013729444,0.00020285056,0.000011601482,0.000025796317,0.16876751,1.4462582e-7,0.0005202086,0.047605805,0.77958226,0.0001103934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012424828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04214338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7781509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049399096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004522987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99415153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519146971","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v9i1.4729","title":"Caught up in power: Exploring discursive frictions in community research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Sociology; Participatory action research; Empowerment; Reflexivity; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.9168596997342899,"score_gpt":0.7060147559348734,"score_spread":0.21084494379941654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519146971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801558,0.00015724098,0.00018738817,0.00930615,0.00042514625,0.00025495363,0.000010738195,0.0000091187485,0.009493427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956788,0.0033293245,0.00021951506,0.000025263667,0.00013196813,0.00006885659,0.0000012840653,0.000012282718,0.0005327473],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.924023,0.07136052,0.0005995858,0.00010808089,0.0030166653,0.00089218473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804338,0.016513107,0.00010766356,0.00037382383,0.0021596013,0.00041199286],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14710689,0.000108550696,0.00023707045,0.0019125328,0.0029437745,0.00023401227,0.0019747608,0.00008074911,0.00025468043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028376615,0.00008424766,0.000062106046,0.0009988961,0.0015566914,0.0010487904,0.0012635101,0.0076047643,0.00002257625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015788825,0.004075885,0.09670154,0.00005397591,0.00027813375,0.00026174504,0.719152,0.000039323797,0.012235249,0.0706803,0.0053150337,0.08962793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029608388,0.0011037017,0.17290746,0.0010307129,0.0000037999268,0.0000092375685,0.6336565,0.000010360754,0.0031577512,0.113714576,0.071223706,0.0002213711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009863711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019357197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11873028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001665836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063733984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998537},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2519640351","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v9i1.4353","title":"Fundamental researcher attributes: Reflections on ways to facilitate participation in Community Psychology doctoral dissertation research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Participatory action research; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Social science","score_opus":0.8599943278471819,"score_gpt":0.6895646960220765,"score_spread":0.1704296318251054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519640351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9619595,0.000043065505,0.00081580575,0.029066082,0.0004887294,0.00084363954,0.000047454774,0.000019867604,0.006715868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968012,0.0006561535,0.00059208646,0.00097619934,0.00013802623,0.00023851308,0.00003902367,0.000018929813,0.00053986534],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96650565,0.029345162,0.0011214775,0.00014912746,0.0018564705,0.0010221313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813284,0.014081226,0.0001812486,0.0006356104,0.0031936613,0.0005798363],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05916366,0.00016394487,0.00029769778,0.0020328963,0.004682338,0.00007028107,0.0012899365,0.00015021926,0.0004282283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00914962,0.00012277749,0.000053624495,0.00083741,0.00037826554,0.0003447684,0.0011528161,0.009734989,0.00023530883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020672755,0.010358683,0.17158188,0.0004858692,0.00046761383,0.000087960434,0.50168496,0.00008190131,0.028352946,0.028006397,0.075255044,0.16296399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049179923,0.005470758,0.74769527,0.0015044371,0.0000041458247,0.000007654465,0.08638997,0.000006919469,0.0004731513,0.061644956,0.09167253,0.00021222711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004605938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013958003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5761134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019947514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059164595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519754422","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v9i1.4875","title":"Engaging youth in post-disaster research: Lessons learned from a creative methods approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Royal Roads University; Colorado State University","keywords":"Participatory action research; The arts; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Psychological resilience; Action research; Youth engagement; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Sociology; Resilience (materials science); Political science; Psychology; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.9499925531101757,"score_gpt":0.7393746885007009,"score_spread":0.21061786460947485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519754422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95524335,0.0002386653,0.008501394,0.012838537,0.00018360012,0.00028867592,0.00004603771,0.0000140564625,0.022645695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98413247,0.0017178792,0.013291457,0.00006975962,0.00027828422,0.000029064666,0.000005876269,0.000017784274,0.0004574362],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.892872,0.1023208,0.00056218513,0.00019954046,0.003162079,0.0008834169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97700053,0.018773219,0.00015613569,0.00036264252,0.0031990006,0.0005084681],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17264295,0.00013570479,0.00030375313,0.0012918705,0.001809675,0.000380277,0.0019285268,0.00010946255,0.00035058285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042101156,0.00009858668,0.000087847344,0.00060309225,0.0019416906,0.0007097811,0.0012894871,0.004550104,0.000017043552],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015363995,0.0013186877,0.004455306,0.000016754273,0.00035870733,0.000057832935,0.47541362,0.000008432747,0.018056307,0.014280187,0.00047658826,0.4840212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024153579,0.0008949486,0.01816605,0.00043080028,0.000014898733,0.0000025464926,0.82602084,0.000050262784,0.004394438,0.13290589,0.014497005,0.00020695548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007840702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011413982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48381424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008896303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079034135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948984},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2520419254","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v9i1.4415","title":"Mobilizing Minds: Integrated knowledge translation and youth engagement in the development of mental health information resources","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Confederation College; Manitoba Health; University of Manitoba","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Mental Health Commission; York University","keywords":"Mental health; Knowledge translation; Mental health literacy; Psychology; Citizen journalism; Participatory action research; Youth engagement; Process (computing); Medical education; Public relations; Mental illness; Medicine; Knowledge management; Psychiatry; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.7744764030983363,"score_gpt":0.642694049197663,"score_spread":0.13178235390067328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520419254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820949,0.00015160501,0.0012072336,0.01441376,0.00014939874,0.00063533644,0.00005686989,0.0000051839343,0.0012857041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972343,0.0005463299,0.0014342143,0.0006705212,0.00004281941,0.000029337856,0.000017544713,0.0000045891484,0.000020340558],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98687685,0.010222274,0.0014378204,0.00006552586,0.0010340672,0.0003634756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433935,0.0040376624,0.0005157126,0.00015048835,0.0008213448,0.00013543323],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049928453,0.00009437413,0.00018216079,0.00072712626,0.0014833559,0.000043659067,0.0005922259,0.000041728614,0.00005915414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014939007,0.000056032837,0.000022008024,0.0002992474,0.00020289613,0.0005749009,0.0002775,0.0013594235,0.000006231747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017764114,0.000109749366,0.0049029863,0.00009622603,0.00003181634,2.071456e-7,0.8288555,0.0000013791697,0.00034278556,0.0003420615,0.0008211054,0.16431855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035314832,0.00057005644,0.070347264,0.0011619892,0.0000034378654,0.000004435472,0.80167896,0.000035491263,0.00027649372,0.0006346248,0.121665865,0.00008987055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000389825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000891843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16422868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046463887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075061177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2648644805","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v10i1.5202","title":"Evidence to impact: A community knowledge mobilisation evaluation framework","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Community of practice; Government (linguistics); Knowledge translation; Futures contract; Traditional knowledge; Public relations; Psychology; Medical education; Political science; Business; Computer science; Pedagogy; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.9598708593039994,"score_gpt":0.8130205246968195,"score_spread":0.1468503346071799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2648644805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972947,0.00008491075,0.0016654235,0.019627482,0.0008433109,0.00087129074,0.000023357836,0.000011190097,0.003926004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99604416,0.00038541865,0.001443748,0.0014428707,0.00043730374,0.000109417946,0.0000051042352,0.000011898648,0.00012009295],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9661711,0.030113032,0.00095928786,0.00009825326,0.0021046817,0.00055363117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97177577,0.018614713,0.00074648147,0.0009974709,0.007329001,0.0005365341],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1283668,0.00012759728,0.00023634982,0.00061664486,0.01094438,0.00029086872,0.0025945501,0.00009747449,0.000816385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08728711,0.00010714551,0.000061680024,0.00021447652,0.00035721387,0.0010595882,0.0018852369,0.0062784906,0.00014406654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011927956,0.000879104,0.14295305,0.00031571623,0.00028957386,0.000006807928,0.6249366,0.00019092478,0.002751399,0.0032837845,0.04813103,0.17506923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016097086,0.0015314912,0.86565936,0.0020519074,0.000017828961,0.000010377242,0.07206343,0.0002545367,0.00022630038,0.04159666,0.014824139,0.00015425625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039359597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012367443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7227063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014260738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015008398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99601406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2701668726","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v10i1.5151","title":"Challenging the empowerment expectation: Learning, alienation and design possibilities in community-university research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; General partnership; Sociology; Action research; Public relations; Empowerment; Mainstream; Transformative learning; Narrative; Community organizing; Community development; Community building; Citizen journalism; Community organization; Alienation; Action (physics); Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.37441259983298336,"score_gpt":0.4806579818566796,"score_spread":0.10624538202369621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2701668726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97175366,0.00023799654,0.00023148811,0.010760745,0.00015967412,0.00024714135,0.0000010386428,0.000012164201,0.016596109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99422187,0.004569552,0.00020373263,0.000036451984,0.000098644625,0.0000056126673,0.0000029821629,0.000007595175,0.000853559],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95968866,0.038126525,0.00027618097,0.000076057775,0.0014766344,0.0003559114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916147,0.006148636,0.00020547655,0.00044554033,0.0014570632,0.0001286051],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07806829,0.0000918484,0.00014357519,0.0005552372,0.019024376,0.0008263459,0.0022893474,0.000064017935,0.00005331096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039121425,0.0000807559,0.00003669371,0.0001662294,0.0012940364,0.0005799926,0.0014908229,0.0066793207,0.0000034273394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044592912,0.0006755764,0.012741523,0.000040489107,0.000175116,0.000036553014,0.93326277,0.00056338223,0.00013958674,0.018337445,0.0006590574,0.03292259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008875522,0.00055239414,0.05946109,0.00020210078,0.0000050935373,0.0000056341282,0.9052836,0.00012506956,0.000067704794,0.013063291,0.020262131,0.00008436173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02032698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054791938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07415615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004451049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001896768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805590496","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v11i1.5584","title":"Exploring Community-based Research Values and Principles: Lessons Learned from a Delphi Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Victoria","funders":"Nature","keywords":"Institution; Delphi method; Discipline; Sociology; Delphi; Research design; Psychology; Management science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Social science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.9018461245266791,"score_gpt":0.5094195524366811,"score_spread":0.392426572089998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805590496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98958254,0.00025763593,0.00019659322,0.004411455,0.00026209065,0.0002182992,0.00004067287,0.000014428628,0.005016267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714595,0.001685551,0.000626263,0.00010201319,0.0002338091,0.00002060377,0.000020201365,0.000019637006,0.00014597576],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99307376,0.0051441872,0.000711192,0.00012164982,0.0005383317,0.00041085982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99436146,0.003368282,0.00023787213,0.0005162664,0.0012925338,0.00022360482],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041024238,0.00014357945,0.00034934448,0.0011417774,0.0037496677,0.00060163834,0.0015378986,0.000058213103,0.00014958702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00278722,0.00014967548,0.000061842904,0.00038155436,0.0007312722,0.0005683284,0.0017097687,0.0049239686,0.00003133268],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017911211,0.008048384,0.17105034,0.00008843348,0.0022584598,0.00006870924,0.71936494,0.00004945121,0.00052648113,0.021285031,0.0029418305,0.07252684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042016655,0.0041757734,0.348993,0.0002965687,0.000013584432,0.0000073518195,0.32219982,0.00025835176,0.00048524007,0.28868142,0.03032365,0.00036355763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006979431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001037481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3971651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032409592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000120161574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805866085","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v11i1.5439","title":"Expectations of Field Supervisors in Kenya: Implications for Community-based Human Service Practicums","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Higher Education and Employability","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Practicum; Employability; Kenya; CLARITY; Thematic analysis; Medical education; Psychology; Experiential learning; Pedagogy; Public relations; Qualitative research; Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.38009804173076306,"score_gpt":0.5445361942675295,"score_spread":0.16443815253676647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805866085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9559332,0.00002299088,0.0005016765,0.039835457,0.00015669127,0.0002257019,0.000014022636,0.0000064838114,0.003303787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977373,0.000047312664,0.0015360065,0.00043893058,0.00013732877,0.000029346773,0.000019245163,0.000005277642,0.0000492767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994916,0.0040113283,0.0004012343,0.000048140442,0.0004370481,0.00018622284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99198323,0.0042011985,0.00015688439,0.00025160649,0.0032965215,0.00011055194],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011534197,0.000057542584,0.00012328154,0.00036119047,0.0018963777,0.00008742112,0.00087517087,0.000049946946,0.00012821666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024125723,0.000057090958,0.000045563553,0.00034515912,0.00038143928,0.0002239484,0.00013170751,0.0011288712,0.0000026414834],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006663713,0.0069472874,0.25822723,0.00018687402,0.0002728812,0.0000010126561,0.63803595,0.000059134043,0.0058486694,0.06285849,0.014313095,0.012583018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030254885,0.0025623632,0.28017598,0.00027398634,0.000025961315,0.0000031201569,0.43333605,0.000024352963,0.004660522,0.20616627,0.0695005,0.00024540696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074844374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017272586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20469987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017285382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003470726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806302925","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v11i1.5527","title":"Brokering Community–campus Partnerships: An Analytical Framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Lakehead University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Public relations; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Diversity (politics); Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.4671991221658809,"score_gpt":0.5218571800187796,"score_spread":0.05465805785289868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806302925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95536494,0.00010513298,0.0010514122,0.0053455387,0.0005457729,0.00012129788,0.0000029722878,0.00004377561,0.037419125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959291,0.0006192443,0.0017287895,0.00051733677,0.00088883087,0.0000053655785,0.0000094174875,0.000016604743,0.00028526032],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.973571,0.02363991,0.00045556418,0.00008225584,0.0017434832,0.00050778245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99253815,0.003913696,0.00019172313,0.00059006957,0.002319709,0.0004466736],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042687792,0.0001413699,0.00022682,0.00049342366,0.0071395393,0.000634807,0.0027451867,0.00012707594,0.0003983455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037631737,0.00013665241,0.00008108552,0.00040269867,0.0013389818,0.00053316756,0.0010997771,0.0081584435,0.000036049925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001156949,0.0038727724,0.01649649,0.00006933289,0.0010821318,0.00006366043,0.6254013,0.00007619735,0.0003318037,0.192734,0.006954848,0.1517605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010169913,0.0027516177,0.012882256,0.0004100526,0.00003292566,0.000023273169,0.65080976,0.0001576789,0.00037107765,0.071262896,0.26000512,0.0002763339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038433995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028715646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25305027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030373232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022110596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908696624","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v12i1.6013","title":"Building a children's health and environment research agenda in Alberta, Canada: A multi-stakeholder engagement process","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Covenant Health; University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Stakeholder engagement; Stakeholder; Process (computing); Process management; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Business; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.2804128335423144,"score_gpt":0.4589881417506577,"score_spread":0.17857530820834333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908696624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98407143,0.001386885,0.000022959592,0.012825071,0.00013674563,0.0005233459,0.0000100813095,0.0000027782933,0.001020678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834234,0.015091653,0.00043261232,0.0005761578,0.00009129468,0.000019856976,0.000007870931,0.000011004913,0.0003461179],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917983,0.004890771,0.0004696584,0.00014234657,0.0020616783,0.0006372595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997692,0.0014252386,0.00014317431,0.00016924492,0.00020235484,0.0003680175],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020658078,0.000109674955,0.0002140918,0.00040441132,0.0016461922,0.00016397896,0.0006874523,0.000050188868,0.0001642955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006296813,0.00010602445,0.000023565433,0.00015476342,0.0004335166,0.0002891153,0.0005271419,0.0028688838,0.0000055771447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067622616,0.0027442144,0.57173675,0.0009883059,0.00042358006,0.000083277504,0.35445318,0.00062323624,0.00019491019,0.019274998,0.006255189,0.04254611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036278646,0.0012420724,0.43736178,0.0011499559,0.000008990261,0.000021900873,0.4870899,0.00007572685,0.00013363925,0.0037130145,0.06526487,0.00031027515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56210107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5326836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13437499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013662537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012175306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909884955","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v12i1.6193","title":"Combining feminist intersectional and community-engaged research commitments: Adaptations for scoping reviews and secondary analyses of national data sets","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Guelph; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Intersectionality; Reflexivity; Sociology; Deliberation; Feminism; Gender studies; Participatory action research; Community engagement; Public relations; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.6912125058013038,"score_gpt":0.5861191774131206,"score_spread":0.1050933283881832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909884955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854077,0.0012906034,0.00051818247,0.0016184496,0.0002007811,0.0006096138,0.0003167148,0.0000064385754,0.010031526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930628,0.0041352855,0.0022806423,0.000091252165,0.000087730776,0.000014113518,0.00021807662,0.000008293374,0.00010183618],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679694,0.029629754,0.00064628205,0.0001246416,0.001365957,0.0002639759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763057,0.02126789,0.0003062582,0.00033107155,0.0016317703,0.00015731069],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1212935,0.000100853154,0.0003216006,0.0007511999,0.0072558764,0.00037231532,0.0013353116,0.00004341529,0.0000898946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012978962,0.0000928736,0.000056619712,0.00028946224,0.0008942024,0.00070450944,0.001630342,0.005711298,0.0000017101411],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017981769,0.00497863,0.05419841,0.002417027,0.0053111734,0.000014020314,0.615865,0.00017552974,0.018216847,0.06009878,0.0337848,0.20314161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040368075,0.0018903713,0.02678608,0.004442879,0.000085779684,0.000035417354,0.8457252,0.0015013916,0.0003630497,0.04075627,0.074025586,0.00035116792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016789282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018531589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2298602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001223647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036905566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99658257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946195929","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v12i1.6342","title":"Embracing complexity: Co-creation with retired immigrant women","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bow Valley College","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Immigration; Co-creation; Agency (philosophy); Face (sociological concept); Citizen journalism; Participatory action research; Reflexivity; Process (computing); Power (physics); Sociology; Participatory design; Public relations; Knowledge management; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Social science; Operations management; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.12026785190246693,"score_gpt":0.36594555431407544,"score_spread":0.24567770241160852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946195929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9534634,0.000021638738,0.00024398297,0.0019998888,0.0002166328,0.0001816623,0.0000017182764,0.000021518483,0.043849558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985032,0.000037048205,0.00048915326,0.0004482593,0.00023945076,0.000012405256,0.000026179885,0.000011647227,0.00023266261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982838,0.00020714563,0.00032856214,0.00008195887,0.0008254886,0.00027303476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980342,0.00019302832,0.00025398584,0.00016801262,0.0013319867,0.000018836625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008055929,0.00010983771,0.00019477226,0.000607221,0.0007063164,0.00024864843,0.0006556066,0.000057927093,0.00018752036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002418499,0.000088116576,0.00002803041,0.0003292325,0.00037539558,0.00059110543,0.0004581068,0.0015721141,0.00004293569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005365109,0.0016624443,0.08625223,0.00046775158,0.001942311,0.00010844339,0.033527,0.000087413326,0.0067046303,0.7911829,0.0055648675,0.0671349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067360927,0.001079517,0.20565856,0.0006243635,0.000028976381,0.000071367394,0.17321955,0.00033280096,0.003875918,0.49471906,0.11303705,0.0006167406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018880855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025308269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29646382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021776278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005682232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6830141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950429336","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v12i1.6496","title":"Political economics, collective action and wicked socio-ecological problems: A practice story from the field","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Australian Government; Agriculture Victoria; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Collective action; Public relations; Government (linguistics); Politics; Wicked problem; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Participatory action research; Political science; Management; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.24222860880309935,"score_gpt":0.39639041747801457,"score_spread":0.15416180867491522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950429336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9514778,0.0003760937,0.00008226531,0.034318935,0.00031945854,0.00017206192,0.000022130602,0.000004728476,0.0132265035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99654,0.0014755684,0.00023881455,0.0012725657,0.00013186708,0.0000055558944,0.000008240635,0.0000064990404,0.0003208559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980533,0.001188688,0.00034443583,0.00007506018,0.000121991165,0.00021653684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224985,0.006945499,0.00022452339,0.00015684502,0.00031979458,0.00010347635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007746389,0.00008092304,0.00020148332,0.00015950622,0.000781665,0.00023022696,0.00050929235,0.000074701486,0.00023257393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030063745,0.00006964962,0.000051965973,0.000071932285,0.00021883614,0.00040486312,0.0004702919,0.002263879,0.0000256217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018972217,0.0025050305,0.23921332,0.000056132834,0.0032866544,0.00001901759,0.121805795,0.000042607757,0.00016012484,0.5778365,0.029524338,0.023653256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020988635,0.0013121868,0.30374208,0.000059071157,0.00001285996,0.000022757744,0.11386342,0.00012026861,0.000059121223,0.44544145,0.133071,0.00019692721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001109376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016608818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13239507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004692364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121765675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9835554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996902741","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v12i2.6726","title":"Ensuring durability of community-university engagement in a challenging context: Empirical evidence on Science Shops","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Lyon; Technological University Dublin; European Commission; Queen's University; University College Cork; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Public relations; Curriculum; Formative assessment; Political science; Citizen journalism; Empirical evidence; Summative assessment; Empirical research; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.43997730342276736,"score_gpt":0.47679141223307153,"score_spread":0.03681410881030417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996902741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823733,0.00013096581,0.0000386849,0.0049567763,0.00026439436,0.00027998994,0.0000029793234,0.000015213422,0.011937673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982651,0.0012949533,0.0001201538,0.00015770797,0.00004575861,0.0000022041247,0.0000017071739,0.000008007513,0.00010444619],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97584844,0.020765947,0.00050488336,0.000115102164,0.0022980608,0.00046756843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98938847,0.007900284,0.00025915197,0.0005901306,0.0016468669,0.00021509756],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.077149004,0.00013610054,0.00029824415,0.0010544905,0.0031474957,0.00016462627,0.002994318,0.00006673526,0.00015825163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004104472,0.0001373336,0.000087623805,0.0007244852,0.0010708012,0.00062678556,0.0016873166,0.0063290517,0.0000114471795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020565111,0.0046794405,0.13648063,0.0003246983,0.000349437,0.00005406653,0.7450041,0.0022535876,0.004657941,0.029542783,0.0003588818,0.074237935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015314744,0.0015267266,0.19001767,0.0013126667,0.000011745665,0.0000051064817,0.7886494,0.00011448684,0.0012518216,0.0026625984,0.0127129,0.00020341648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007322724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002177557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07403452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010263069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004684719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998197509","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v12i2.6856","title":"The University of Gondar, Queen’s University and Mastercard Foundation Scholars Program: A partnership for disability-inclusive higher education in Ethiopia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mentorship; General partnership; Population; Capacity building; Community-based rehabilitation; Public relations; Medical education; Political science; Sociology; Rehabilitation; Medicine","score_opus":0.0803837894828188,"score_gpt":0.40545795039810406,"score_spread":0.3250741609152853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998197509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98885494,0.00017436863,0.000015761925,0.007961114,0.00006538201,0.0005431388,0.0000018968335,0.0000036521326,0.0023797182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646115,0.0011291837,0.00021589115,0.000028016311,0.000024932453,0.0000015796113,0.00001320391,0.0000047560147,0.0021213018],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979133,0.0011598676,0.00020678416,0.000066805806,0.00049872685,0.00015450953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978137,0.00075063645,0.000114829825,0.00017657892,0.0010676319,0.00007664523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050741904,0.00005970162,0.00015158266,0.00017599366,0.00045799036,0.00005336392,0.00032730386,0.000049606973,0.000060313934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029220883,0.000049885046,0.00005031692,0.00012110799,0.00042727063,0.00025702885,0.00033493337,0.0011828218,0.0000025278605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012278902,0.0028210909,0.55614525,0.00088100805,0.00070338347,0.000017313667,0.013507575,0.000023786926,0.0017900366,0.026797863,0.002760087,0.38227367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004182161,0.0014431863,0.6775891,0.00038890683,0.000022106773,0.000008114882,0.055669542,0.00009643746,0.0001511471,0.0052372385,0.25513518,0.00007686196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033682043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008656712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3821968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033740047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004960119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5138838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034522349","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.7037","title":"Assessing excellence in community-based research: Lessons from research with Syrian refugee newcomers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Community Based Research","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Refugee; Excellence; Public relations; Psychological intervention; Sociology; Community engagement; Adaptability; Psychological resilience; Political science; Psychology; Management; Social psychology","score_opus":0.9653541948052593,"score_gpt":0.7630462884017304,"score_spread":0.20230790640352891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034522349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.840806,0.000050581813,0.0006525388,0.15401083,0.00016869302,0.00058188377,0.000046038913,0.00001686842,0.003666545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912494,0.0003333348,0.0027145296,0.0051770844,0.00033281939,0.00007313425,0.000028591363,0.000027277028,0.000063833024],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9009004,0.091506556,0.0012675634,0.00020911568,0.0047970465,0.0013193104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95004654,0.042739917,0.000365366,0.0006237167,0.005347075,0.0008773907],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13270496,0.00016928435,0.0003802128,0.0017250859,0.0072642965,0.0003762533,0.0029563038,0.00013037256,0.00043202186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014754952,0.00014338529,0.00004310472,0.0018720059,0.0013289851,0.00089025486,0.0018303476,0.024625435,0.00006579355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006280155,0.0023268224,0.12794532,0.0013145143,0.00041166606,0.00053188676,0.7171979,0.0008254841,0.011110723,0.0056369496,0.08357388,0.042844713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067187715,0.00290202,0.10042057,0.0025917138,0.0000073840256,0.00000779235,0.65120614,0.0003867518,0.0007634906,0.011854475,0.22286606,0.00027483676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01484155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035987904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15044339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012026869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030367214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034602061","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6745","title":"The tree of community knowledge and engagement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Sociology; Disadvantaged; Participatory action research; Narrative; Citizen journalism; Storytelling; Community engagement; Traditional knowledge; Transformative learning; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Anthropology; Ecology","score_opus":0.5197415007244252,"score_gpt":0.5479708754467487,"score_spread":0.028229374722323564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034602061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9013471,0.00063372497,0.00011867242,0.055332992,0.0003112424,0.00013074158,0.000002809125,0.0000073173155,0.042115387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99620116,0.0027669538,0.00018756505,0.000282772,0.0002199184,0.0000035515575,0.0000024056296,0.000004831832,0.00033084332],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834754,0.015183075,0.0003409327,0.00003644533,0.0007849609,0.00017919354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99162924,0.0059829447,0.00026314537,0.00013458029,0.0018468498,0.00014321716],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032517567,0.00006507757,0.00011974917,0.00014004893,0.0039024865,0.0002340146,0.0009690446,0.00003134864,0.00010288483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077793687,0.000048881968,0.000033440054,0.00025403211,0.0008817884,0.00026061924,0.0005324982,0.0033838437,0.000004854657],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041786028,0.0007739555,0.0046987454,0.000051447325,0.0003947921,0.0000027810786,0.6995969,0.000007640596,0.0008419487,0.074769475,0.025293734,0.19315074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046233667,0.00047445175,0.021616304,0.000038878585,0.000007147913,0.000001902723,0.35350886,0.0000100744755,0.00031289493,0.0039111194,0.61960816,0.00004790916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007906476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049512816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5943144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008334016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025950698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035260022","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.7110","title":"Injustices épistémiques et recherche participative: un agenda de recherche à la croisée de l’université et des communautés","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.9307859812820833,"score_gpt":0.6900613775980631,"score_spread":0.24072460368402027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035260022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80251515,0.0032537295,0.027742662,0.13681185,0.000226114,0.00018140173,0.000048753685,0.000018450459,0.029201912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9088563,0.0436924,0.042307608,0.003947431,0.00012530776,0.000007863095,0.00001137706,0.000017022323,0.001034708],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.873787,0.12233672,0.0008778618,0.0001621434,0.0022996638,0.0005366213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96459275,0.030769097,0.00042096552,0.00032604038,0.0033676461,0.0005234745],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20075853,0.00019748339,0.0003193257,0.00036794916,0.0010578246,0.0009775277,0.0022772148,0.00026625034,0.0025538756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029930498,0.00017472294,0.0001333443,0.00064530806,0.0008579867,0.0011355975,0.0013745343,0.0094023375,0.000044470347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012207092,0.0015147317,0.013444554,0.00015475648,0.00075036444,0.00015134425,0.43876305,0.0022733873,0.0025292963,0.017049367,0.022662494,0.49948594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033705642,0.0036436447,0.08853576,0.0010596197,0.00012637627,0.00021113433,0.26949096,0.011936178,0.009202377,0.36331433,0.24870531,0.0004037652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009518874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053572544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49908218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013028674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001989049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99835795},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3035543251","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6862","title":"Engaging a community for youth mental health and wellness: Reflections and lessons learned","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; General partnership; Alliance; Community engagement; Public relations; Action plan; Plan (archaeology); Medical education; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Management","score_opus":0.9289957685516339,"score_gpt":0.7375774755457462,"score_spread":0.19141829300588775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035543251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7037399,0.00021547535,0.0021615755,0.291963,0.00024867133,0.00066886866,0.0002333689,0.000020429365,0.0007486824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832141,0.0020757087,0.0016176512,0.012746289,0.00019814285,0.00003389376,0.000028847115,0.000013860341,0.00007151514],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842888,0.013688183,0.00074938644,0.00010370166,0.00068107643,0.0004888475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926023,0.0053686034,0.00036021287,0.00017221631,0.0007823146,0.0007143682],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02636769,0.000113422524,0.00025511562,0.0003226096,0.0087387245,0.00010531166,0.00052938215,0.00004982118,0.000046068384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052759536,0.00010345918,0.000031888336,0.00022418739,0.00033192945,0.00032139398,0.0007182325,0.0046559973,0.0000033318959],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067172095,0.00017065402,0.00397386,0.00047643096,0.00016808056,0.0000011889892,0.9444664,0.000005904006,0.0008472545,0.0035478633,0.013859601,0.031811032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032115958,0.0015901123,0.0036230073,0.0002667629,0.000009408473,0.000013341075,0.80828243,0.00013966604,0.00010012734,0.0055478197,0.1771094,0.00010633911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014459311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036990046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2794742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022267902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066939637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035732902","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.6703","title":"Epistemic injustices and participatory research: A research agenda at the crossroads of university and community","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Knowledge production; Process (computing); Multidisciplinary approach; Engineering ethics; Community-based participatory research; Knowledge management; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5911988744289527,"score_gpt":0.5169218799859034,"score_spread":0.07427699444304925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035732902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757966,0.0008259755,0.000007046196,0.010508489,0.000102096856,0.000280006,0.000018426956,0.0000050366334,0.012456345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97386694,0.02504376,0.000049441827,0.000048688522,0.00017359784,9.394605e-7,0.00000386649,0.0000060069165,0.0008067619],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95562387,0.0416898,0.00033529507,0.000087904824,0.0017887767,0.0004743367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98702943,0.009345812,0.00014759548,0.00022924106,0.0028786687,0.00036923503],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08379397,0.000074421914,0.00016632452,0.00034436787,0.02430331,0.00018852223,0.001133543,0.0000748574,0.00007724186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001265708,0.00005612923,0.000032208536,0.00042797573,0.004559982,0.0002788339,0.00028851492,0.0047518443,0.0000043250234],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006826687,0.00037222984,0.0043907063,0.00015929279,0.00011778218,0.000013572355,0.96510476,0.000004179594,0.00021690376,0.025458176,0.0018428265,0.0016368758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068283116,0.0011299262,0.018019378,0.0001451,0.000012518066,0.000010364749,0.6493534,0.000017046395,0.00045739944,0.009381299,0.32071176,0.00007896704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07191039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15062071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31886894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039044113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026142197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110716173","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v13i1.7208","title":"Mobilising knowledge on newcomers: Engaging key stakeholders to establish a research hub for Alberta","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Global Health Workforce Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Grassroots; Stakeholder; Public relations; Immigration; Process (computing); Refugee; Stakeholder engagement; Work (physics); Service (business); Business; Knowledge management; Sociology; Political science; Marketing; Politics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7639935676177222,"score_gpt":0.6227138609419187,"score_spread":0.14127970667580347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110716173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91799206,0.0003678221,0.00058180245,0.055492833,0.00080718356,0.0016606299,0.00003656368,0.00002668313,0.023034418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99414825,0.00045497023,0.0014799485,0.0020809718,0.0007997999,0.000105984465,0.000022227332,0.000038546583,0.0008693224],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98549443,0.010589157,0.00091655616,0.00020566382,0.0017213284,0.00107285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767116,0.017177489,0.00020600604,0.00036439282,0.0045880796,0.00095247064],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030385906,0.00018027738,0.00036101273,0.00082525425,0.0042376034,0.00018503034,0.0016138912,0.000118482756,0.00020902429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013347019,0.0001618161,0.000088503664,0.00069373706,0.00021661556,0.00032804953,0.0013118146,0.007943492,0.00008746783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072733755,0.0014274894,0.0057940646,0.0013787783,0.0005147351,0.00004418092,0.4648949,0.00079176895,0.0017397956,0.0165256,0.4329735,0.06664184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003128108,0.0039928234,0.0015842046,0.0024115664,0.00001057286,0.000004691325,0.32621306,0.0003565334,0.0004172728,0.00539415,0.6562913,0.00019574967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020912525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008346828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22331779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088826363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063230516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172577139","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v14i1.7665","title":"Undergraduate students’ perceptions of community engagement: A snapshot of a public research university in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Perception; Incentive; Population; Psychology; Community engagement; Student engagement; Public university; Social media; Medicine; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.3769326333865275,"score_gpt":0.45827330594461263,"score_spread":0.08134067255808514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172577139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97729343,0.00014279307,0.00005093564,0.006663349,0.00015095116,0.00015762122,0.000020811856,0.000004615752,0.0155155035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954072,0.003974417,0.00020411797,0.00006321829,0.000037575886,0.0000027599417,0.00003291562,0.000008685269,0.00026910548],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9346678,0.060908653,0.0005908198,0.000080815946,0.0032613764,0.00049051555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98887146,0.0055912617,0.000248837,0.0005201959,0.0045177485,0.00025048028],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05492689,0.000111597874,0.00031334374,0.0008861691,0.0030421806,0.00014568848,0.0028725166,0.000062286,0.00043243376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029539145,0.00012275501,0.00008143505,0.0011684954,0.0007380477,0.00030687876,0.0023950597,0.007003929,0.0000016740196],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005774759,0.008989858,0.40409932,0.00038285455,0.0017504423,0.0002454942,0.4791701,0.00069130334,0.0025909366,0.05952941,0.0071386546,0.03483417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011972542,0.00030000435,0.14487994,0.00022601426,0.000012008586,0.000004909563,0.8265877,0.0000106575235,0.0002574565,0.004422082,0.022011844,0.00009015638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7791983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9122934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3474176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017054504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003281973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200246050","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v14i2.7766","title":"Harnessing the Power of Stories for Rural Sustainability: Reflections on Community-Based Research on the Great Northern Peninsula of Newfoundland","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Research & Development Corporation; Canadian Historical Association; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Office of Research and Engagement, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Storytelling; Sustainability; Narrative; Scholarship; Power (physics); Community engagement; Participatory action research; Sociology; Citizen journalism; Political science; Peninsula; Economic growth; Public relations; Geography; Anthropology; Ecology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.2997044725142692,"score_gpt":0.43565953633174226,"score_spread":0.13595506381747308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200246050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96899223,0.000055193814,0.000011781846,0.029593104,0.0001039596,0.00027736145,0.000021063122,0.000003365966,0.00094196346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945545,0.0000615022,0.000032362073,0.00011207072,0.000054979577,0.000018809495,0.000025294556,0.0000015086612,0.00023803014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99113035,0.007083016,0.0003771513,0.00006353798,0.0010927637,0.00025315114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815053,0.0116015915,0.000147194,0.00020198434,0.006482339,0.000061613726],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018908637,0.000091920956,0.00017403382,0.000085258864,0.0028356728,0.00016756829,0.00094522367,0.000045873672,0.000070593815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038833166,0.000032910557,0.000110859335,0.0004319973,0.0007186529,0.000101103375,0.0003829478,0.0021200476,3.9001083e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022790486,0.016005913,0.35935438,0.00095222966,0.002368246,0.00007675933,0.16846587,0.0016813701,0.105076365,0.11083202,0.01713003,0.19526635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011097054,0.0052624648,0.3359842,0.00032074432,0.00001536737,0.000012858383,0.4851498,0.000033244523,0.01005286,0.12898715,0.03291346,0.00015815132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015734957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032278707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31668392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032660604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023485362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200526305","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v14i2.7767","title":"Community Members as Facilitators: Reclaiming Community-Based Research as Inherently of the People","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"University Challenges and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Subjectivity; Facilitator; Hegemony; Gender studies; Community engagement; Power (physics); Community organization; Community building; Community development; Scholarship; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.4033662419539349,"score_gpt":0.4780252914659908,"score_spread":0.07465904951205593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200526305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93408453,0.00017661015,0.000014326834,0.015202654,0.00028125153,0.00016805419,0.00001615282,0.000008132239,0.0500483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967366,0.0015296305,0.00012550401,0.00015705689,0.000079154546,0.000003014589,0.00001222366,0.000008795795,0.0013480061],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9624153,0.03398027,0.00040867296,0.00006537291,0.0027139361,0.0004164798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899885,0.004557312,0.00019940516,0.0005930988,0.0044136755,0.00024803056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041120514,0.00011029928,0.00023809727,0.00041907484,0.00948048,0.0002159123,0.0027214102,0.00011690624,0.00044601876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043146187,0.000082853345,0.000160089,0.0006708988,0.001579008,0.0003161017,0.0020188917,0.009147326,0.0000074756895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011894846,0.0045361333,0.008418465,0.0003237492,0.0010456354,0.00007355717,0.924573,0.00029721155,0.0033343632,0.027090285,0.008543251,0.020574842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011053579,0.0007355171,0.0051313885,0.00040950623,0.0000116821275,0.000016493845,0.85196173,0.00000922454,0.0035674614,0.0325648,0.104381174,0.000105673134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043007895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027022302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09583792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056727655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011426635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285046730","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v15i1.8014","title":"Appraising HEI-community Partnerships: Assessing Performance, Monitoring Progress, and Evaluating Impacts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Brock University","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Higher education; Value (mathematics); Momentum (technical analysis); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.534948990344194,"score_gpt":0.5378182418501275,"score_spread":0.0028692515059335344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285046730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897944,0.00083040056,0.000027035148,0.002589428,0.0004336123,0.00016812056,0.0000024881526,0.000030912757,0.0061236206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725664,0.001225725,0.0010429163,0.000074681484,0.00026970872,0.000022895192,0.000009735897,0.000015985917,0.000081743376],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9692045,0.027451543,0.00044378592,0.000081803744,0.0023419065,0.00047650415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951823,0.0029606863,0.00030832898,0.00030413564,0.0010005902,0.00024399819],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07017116,0.00013393979,0.00020365455,0.00047715215,0.016412066,0.00089197804,0.0014735054,0.000043272004,0.00009044913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015254875,0.00013666837,0.000053411066,0.00037548505,0.00050504337,0.0007515443,0.0021786909,0.007941769,0.0000014317878],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004931942,0.0015470395,0.16707034,0.00018937154,0.0005499886,0.000032218588,0.40339583,0.0008406223,0.0011231618,0.00197517,0.0005203364,0.4222627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013018317,0.0014221569,0.0695481,0.00041511262,0.000027824372,0.000045697427,0.89458954,0.00027489802,0.00025019335,0.0025753132,0.029335253,0.00021405194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00155566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000116673895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49119374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050727586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032520673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382813050","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v16i1.8433","title":"The Full SPECTRUM: Developing a Tripartite Partnership between Community, Government and Academia for Collaborative Social Policy Research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Saskatchewan; First Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba; Assembly of First Nations; Government of Manitoba; University of Manitoba; Athabasca University; Manitoba Health","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Public policy; Business; Public sector; Capacity building; Public administration; Political science; Knowledge management; Economic growth; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.5627666639997152,"score_gpt":0.48894859798963114,"score_spread":0.07381806601008406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382813050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94195354,0.00040210653,0.00013892067,0.053285886,0.00012355788,0.00034335654,0.00012514392,0.000012724059,0.0036147505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99361724,0.004929641,0.00015255525,0.000108673674,0.0005332951,0.000037409878,0.000025241025,0.000017047994,0.00057890953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949728,0.003111554,0.0006800181,0.00008367968,0.00058388826,0.0005680125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266493,0.006009572,0.00028422117,0.00020609834,0.0006801851,0.0001549802],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048670404,0.0001248688,0.0003034123,0.0005758392,0.0066529354,0.0006330128,0.0012858714,0.00013012112,0.000010477634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036229491,0.000113583934,0.00007015349,0.0008478096,0.0005785349,0.0002759637,0.0014916274,0.0050246557,0.000015283747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015779565,0.00043666933,0.034161076,0.00017652859,0.0021536872,0.000012159491,0.2470151,0.0000131401575,0.00018494259,0.55483335,0.07983934,0.079596065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018104739,0.00074166484,0.149362,0.00008438291,0.0000058147593,0.000004384906,0.088676475,0.00003461366,0.00022707802,0.5399006,0.2189648,0.00018772797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007154677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005837838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15833864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008363587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002684303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99727076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390024953","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v16i1.8695","title":"Inciting Change Makers in an Online Community Engaged Learning Environment During Pandemic Restrictions: Lessons from a Disability Studies and Community Rehabilitation Program","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Disability Education and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mentorship; Context (archaeology); Community engagement; Medical education; Online community; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.5959108086592899,"score_gpt":0.5424592641679227,"score_spread":0.05345154449136724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390024953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908336,0.00016401798,0.0000024479207,0.008178212,0.00015392627,0.0005031181,0.00002146325,0.00006482647,0.00007839496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952,0.0039069797,0.0004898404,0.000040663905,0.00014860158,0.00011409493,0.000067104964,0.000011393256,0.000021349171],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93587124,0.062189143,0.00056500355,0.00011123678,0.0009179095,0.0003454891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841373,0.014653893,0.0001941434,0.00032970562,0.0004682433,0.00021673957],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05721295,0.00013343489,0.00024906284,0.00036770038,0.008341058,0.00021899425,0.0006741595,0.00007516764,0.000027446755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01481389,0.00013311017,0.0000517112,0.00040150987,0.0014643541,0.00063306384,0.0008371663,0.009451299,0.000002573376],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001553479,0.0026185017,0.45131525,0.00007062279,0.0000968262,0.0000030626718,0.4826612,0.000097757285,0.00011726349,0.00011239267,0.000027763137,0.062724024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046769518,0.0004163902,0.49675554,0.00013548495,0.000005623981,0.0000010288784,0.4957348,0.000024704379,0.000006013185,0.005893644,0.00050065434,0.000058402795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026953101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034227144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06266562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001214796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008949906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99348474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400344356","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v17i1.9043","title":"Partnering with older adults for digital research tool development: Demystifying an engaged research process","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Technology Use by Older Adults","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Process management; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.31834468998899484,"score_gpt":0.5116489580342067,"score_spread":0.1933042680452119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400344356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99237484,0.00043263417,0.0008632197,0.0033211177,0.00019520956,0.0007341582,0.000012437045,0.00008020458,0.0019861911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735373,0.0003357019,0.0014070941,0.00001530017,0.00035905823,0.00014385558,0.000017955601,0.000032065578,0.00033520962],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98648405,0.008205711,0.00049459207,0.00024305088,0.0036252222,0.000947368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98529524,0.008459742,0.000071271956,0.00028049923,0.0056037204,0.00028955366],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08957909,0.00014222963,0.00019569312,0.0016099997,0.008197708,0.0016959681,0.0019718485,0.00013766935,0.00004435821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089869555,0.000118823824,0.000044982193,0.0009141858,0.0013310564,0.0014460078,0.0006245165,0.010350183,0.000012841005],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017946486,0.0012122558,0.0034754025,0.0005764141,0.0006201442,0.00023528321,0.6132571,0.000032066586,0.0004994407,0.013159384,0.002733615,0.36240423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029365707,0.0023132525,0.008713939,0.0044369707,0.000012662764,0.00009002271,0.81217074,0.00033658728,0.0042038313,0.031217467,0.1331522,0.00041576108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023685506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009999787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36198848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005833194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014263507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407037588","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v18i1.9204","title":"Reflections on multimodality: Making the most of Kairotic moments","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; Concordia University; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Multimodality; Temporality; Set (abstract data type); Action (physics); Psychology; Sociology; Process (computing); Nature versus nurture; Embodied cognition; Extant taxon; Gesture; Dementia; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Cognitive science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5235015950626245,"score_gpt":0.6256994173569888,"score_spread":0.10219782229436425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407037588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73581785,0.00009070099,0.0005104081,0.061685402,0.0009969868,0.0001789156,0.000002787974,0.000007133674,0.20070983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974631,0.00026859652,0.00023763477,0.000489821,0.00010198839,0.000004699851,0.0000012541034,0.0000023017071,0.0014305835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431366,0.0045000673,0.00025184825,0.00003665591,0.0007704161,0.00012734873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995485,0.002562931,0.00018822937,0.0001227448,0.0016108911,0.000030196603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01528184,0.000042316606,0.00007562964,0.00037998555,0.0019228334,0.00014105806,0.0006271835,0.000025375779,0.00012911177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049492074,0.00003137444,0.000027483593,0.00043254913,0.0004119564,0.00015970794,0.00015938464,0.0016342509,0.000003088925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068748696,0.0021681897,0.010996812,0.000051889183,0.0009261644,0.000005142146,0.24005367,0.00046253903,0.00090917596,0.6526482,0.024611585,0.06647915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007316862,0.0004080772,0.052875794,0.00035716733,0.000015221203,0.000002435124,0.36227813,0.000025546247,0.00061961514,0.035812482,0.54680336,0.000070514376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093900505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021113583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6168357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017938319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002888465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407037868","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v18i1.9326","title":"Resisting scientific extractivism: A post-extractivist policy of knowledge production with marginalized communities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Sociology; Accountability; Negotiation; Citizen journalism; Context (archaeology); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Knowledge production; Epistemic community; Public relations; Economic Justice; Environmental ethics; Political science; Social science; Law; Knowledge management; Politics","score_opus":0.10285725373780806,"score_gpt":0.3726999817559034,"score_spread":0.26984272801809533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407037868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97019297,0.0004959125,0.00082725583,0.0012266557,0.0003139956,0.00014669137,0.000005615405,0.000024529429,0.02676638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99753743,0.0003359027,0.00060932024,0.000010228778,0.000089182875,0.000009586945,0.000009633947,0.000012287563,0.0013864221],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977256,0.0010434698,0.0003598154,0.000058045982,0.00059811026,0.00021493727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742854,0.00069390814,0.00011654749,0.00029283375,0.0014061421,0.0000620125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006499255,0.000113113994,0.00019475637,0.0013888276,0.0009396556,0.00019820635,0.00063450227,0.000031547363,0.000019634586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044243148,0.00009316803,0.00004400778,0.00044509553,0.0004611334,0.00018644716,0.00032616188,0.0015261049,0.0000013873932],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067216116,0.007510349,0.015490116,0.0053549553,0.008910547,0.00012903921,0.21936305,0.036349446,0.13118275,0.033993974,0.038550008,0.49644417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009050454,0.0037041884,0.13326858,0.010403363,0.00023064805,0.0003467235,0.42373544,0.00561217,0.07268011,0.011196128,0.3287054,0.0010668045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002934076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012919717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49537736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019883426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000145447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7227166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407037871","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v18i1.9579","title":"Writing research differently","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustenance; CLARITY; Cohesion (chemistry); Sociology; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Futures contract; Semiotics; Order (exchange); Computer science; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.31778155388950574,"score_gpt":0.48512936960495284,"score_spread":0.1673478157154471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407037871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7203807,0.001291976,0.000070091126,0.006791039,0.0005202233,0.00009487691,0.000009574123,0.000010481167,0.27083102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932392,0.0009954235,0.00007839441,0.00013710976,0.0005033421,0.000008440628,0.000005869767,0.0000068428194,0.0050253803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952932,0.0025981872,0.0004178538,0.00007214746,0.0013089224,0.0003096759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99441135,0.0019458254,0.000085509055,0.00022791076,0.0032602628,0.00006916418],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01460286,0.00008906148,0.00018991804,0.0011001871,0.002281025,0.0007114003,0.0010447357,0.000023326655,0.00067075726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012633553,0.00006989763,0.00007843255,0.00012777626,0.0010091569,0.00025126187,0.0010727786,0.0027253863,0.000014382033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025300367,0.0010454967,0.0019616857,0.00008845991,0.0019772963,0.000071138595,0.11312793,0.000011523621,0.0003704103,0.7378254,0.063832656,0.07943501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011071651,0.000538549,0.0034643463,0.0005987808,0.0000388038,0.000008392503,0.57880485,0.000031352633,0.0005894892,0.14949666,0.26518753,0.00013404796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004605515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000638455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5883287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014462322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008400207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412809898","doi":"10.5130/ijcre.v18i2.9405","title":"Youth knowledge mobilization: Reflections on theory and practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mobilization; Business; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Knowledge management; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.2878330563888806,"score_gpt":0.4711906353701397,"score_spread":0.1833575789812591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412809898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48959917,0.0004955156,0.007597179,0.0129358275,0.001085901,0.0002883561,0.0000030167537,0.000046422265,0.48794863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997103,0.00036909687,0.00054136437,0.0013284851,0.00019740633,0.000009041625,0.000008196665,0.0000054584043,0.00043799487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983698,0.00085203926,0.00025841838,0.00006793969,0.00031641818,0.00013539061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996609,0.0013667728,0.00013122012,0.000121197445,0.0017615911,0.000010274823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015588239,0.000079018966,0.00010627905,0.0007783093,0.0011694684,0.00020723513,0.00041498194,0.00006051645,0.0000239918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044519585,0.000068785026,0.000022135147,0.00047256032,0.00033504705,0.0004385681,0.00069165294,0.0014665768,0.000007212436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055993005,0.00052257197,0.00049023516,0.00004035575,0.00026833275,0.0000048542565,0.0054939245,0.0000065118866,0.00011828459,0.9646339,0.002462884,0.025398256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013628884,0.00019989334,0.008002597,0.00030407312,0.000045795794,0.000013530232,0.18703079,0.000020647649,0.00051295676,0.62077266,0.18158402,0.00015012277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032377076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014983283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5075038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010396056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006323251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8994724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}