{"meta":{"query_hash":"4877154cdde0","filters":{"venue":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4877154cdde0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=General+Technical+Report%2C+Pacific+Northwest+Research+Station%2C+USDA+Forest+Service"},"results":[{"id":"W1415524641","doi":"","title":"Methods to assess landscape-scale risk of bark beetle infestation to support forest management decisions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bark beetle; Scale (ratio); Forest management; Environmental resource management; Mountain pine beetle; Computer science; Geography; Ecology; Risk analysis (engineering); Bark (sound); Forestry; Cartography; Environmental science; Business; Biology","score_opus":0.03975616043463532,"score_gpt":0.38268412443484584,"score_spread":0.34292796400021053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1415524641","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012624877,0.0014595962,0.97090405,0.0007348755,0.00006859043,0.00053925964,0.0010514451,0.000997345,0.011620043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13790202,0.0014157894,0.85459536,0.0002176449,0.000048548693,0.0007604012,0.0008263123,0.00022090835,0.0040130448],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.993707,0.0025176555,0.00046167587,0.0007941255,0.002300448,0.00021912239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733899,0.014581073,0.0035813448,0.0022868467,0.0058008577,0.00036004314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010557485,0.0016106962,0.0009907901,0.00593513,0.0009102724,0.0038886578,0.0021446387,0.0010643313,0.0049843052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037102934,0.00059681205,0.0015596383,0.003504977,0.0011389197,0.00212494,0.0019696513,0.0014592633,0.0012251583],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015956635,0.0002629836,0.06838604,0.001947163,0.0010548508,0.00019745085,0.0023505073,0.09082295,0.0040446552,0.05134234,0.008993842,0.7704376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022317514,0.000299631,0.09544933,0.002863652,0.00082270347,0.0006557537,0.0042350376,0.6336904,0.007693829,0.16092514,0.09267849,0.0004628603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06377107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10931185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06377107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003266184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005019178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12679976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523629125","doi":"","title":"Modeling potential movements of the emerald ash borer: the model framework","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Emerald ash borer; Fraxinus; Agrilus; Abundance (ecology); Infestation; Ecology; Movement (music); Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Agronomy","score_opus":0.021403961320873417,"score_gpt":0.3071877494510429,"score_spread":0.28578378813016947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523629125","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25707233,0.00068681384,0.7132679,0.003056128,0.00013341071,0.00023192826,0.0032296695,0.0008374709,0.021484278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90704846,0.00072665344,0.07795589,0.00028222706,0.00011506409,0.0004383441,0.0012138406,0.00013445957,0.012085112],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971014,0.000104260565,0.000013811352,0.000072249495,0.000033144985,0.00006641016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899226,0.000606208,0.00015713279,0.00002761539,0.00012011639,0.00009663283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010682005,0.00091727194,0.000864916,0.00079731963,0.00087472564,0.0015683747,0.0029394988,0.0021682489,0.0037515976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032217554,0.00061894074,0.0011397278,0.0008247348,0.0008244919,0.0021174266,0.0012326943,0.0011914701,0.00047964157],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008034363,0.0000119777105,0.0010000115,0.0000111211175,0.000014056802,0.00002378039,0.00001602651,0.9938764,0.00005805804,0.0038093703,0.0002524241,0.00091869273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005857894,0.000006986986,0.00013928364,0.000003086805,0.0000058193073,0.000006077257,0.000011210592,0.9977477,0.000013865126,0.0018265367,0.00022912885,0.0000043853433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08263851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04811639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08263851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018077141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023254924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16431499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194816769","doi":"","title":"Modeling species' realized climatic niche space and predicting their response to global warming for several western forest species with small geographic distributions.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental niche modelling; Climate change; Forest inventory; Ecology; Geography; Species distribution; Range (aeronautics); Larch; Ecological niche; Latitude; Physical geography; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology; Forest management","score_opus":0.05058158209573197,"score_gpt":0.3148267150446951,"score_spread":0.2642451329489631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194816769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920859,0.00005453878,0.006989574,0.000045300774,0.0000034821878,0.00001054472,0.0001761825,0.00004241639,0.0005921063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947918,0.000025969604,0.00469453,0.0000047490767,0.0000028636432,0.000018048555,0.00017824298,0.000007205827,0.0002765501],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99993145,0.00002985811,0.0000026098685,0.000018699864,0.000006059221,0.000011323193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996916,0.00018960572,0.000052911088,0.000013603305,0.000028595648,0.000023676328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000473911,0.00032537224,0.0001258609,0.00027363453,0.00019246004,0.00023437772,0.00035125454,0.00022161662,0.00046047528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010251148,0.00018703385,0.00035390086,0.00027959506,0.00013998909,0.00023392071,0.00018227933,0.00024292857,0.00006899283],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008297848,0.000060328304,0.08652358,0.000028450773,0.00006537001,0.0000478431,0.000080629856,0.9038708,0.0021502795,0.00063313247,0.00026158578,0.006194934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008139021,0.000033362503,0.03440832,0.0000025067498,0.000016032132,0.000016263339,0.000047045174,0.96474034,0.00023041476,0.0003064368,0.0001860199,0.0000052126356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051164474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079787455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051164474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006438678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004659862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10173333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243951501","doi":"","title":"Is the spread of non-native plants in Alaska accelerating?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Invasive species; Native plant; Thistle; Introduced species; Riparian zone; Biology; Population; Pteridophyte; Phalaris arundinacea; Geography; Bromus tectorum; Wetland; Ecology; Fern; Habitat","score_opus":0.03965414959179338,"score_gpt":0.3425678281610528,"score_spread":0.30291367856925944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243951501","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0999191,0.83769625,0.0009834635,0.011502186,0.002285469,0.000029693596,0.0010739098,0.00013459401,0.04637539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15300453,0.83771896,0.0010676708,0.0016910583,0.00046844533,0.000015251264,0.0006876575,0.000013108937,0.0053332304],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961096,0.000033606957,0.000046280307,0.00010988548,0.00015555044,0.00004377868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915373,0.00021055777,0.00023269019,0.00002381691,0.00029999585,0.00007908252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079572276,0.00026776272,0.00031287043,0.0012001112,0.00066415477,0.0018797036,0.00036040274,0.0007543018,0.0035712912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012274752,0.00017539736,0.00040913178,0.0014057631,0.00071540725,0.002010787,0.0004891891,0.0009034309,0.00061582774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002065115,0.0001118609,0.11574333,0.014249166,0.00025468663,0.0037578156,0.006194188,0.0009188676,0.010931994,0.00596563,0.026325418,0.8153405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000112935395,0.0003148116,0.48345292,0.008715565,0.00066238566,0.003997113,0.012183788,0.00038169697,0.0030058317,0.0055680275,0.4815859,0.00012078744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04153559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05830216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04153559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088542135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021404477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08258766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243980587","doi":"","title":"Weeds cross borders project: a Canada-United States collaboration.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","topic":"Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.019883785351265143,"score_gpt":0.3515631996589922,"score_spread":0.33167941430772707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243980587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1384244,0.019917663,0.008666731,0.095997274,0.0037325895,0.0025306495,0.30256113,0.004134544,0.42403498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.287093,0.007937518,0.028502777,0.012045648,0.0002459143,0.0012062943,0.15104488,0.0011903819,0.51073366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982284,0.00014561691,0.00003801217,0.0001483593,0.00071640447,0.00072329957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917278,0.00026196256,0.0001690856,0.00018180815,0.0032549843,0.0044043716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028227768,0.0005611457,0.0004243744,0.0018382646,0.0032386468,0.0017374891,0.0010993875,0.0006654321,0.025223976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002745856,0.0002489537,0.0003879291,0.0022486665,0.0005468336,0.000646203,0.002298746,0.0012045779,0.0032297987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090299797,0.00025406812,0.025275996,0.00020609528,0.00006762261,0.0002932104,0.00088956015,0.00028198297,0.0021873391,0.0055024168,0.85733,0.1068087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003129489,0.000101861675,0.10002608,0.00029116514,0.00012912527,0.00013747007,0.0034899707,0.00060917524,0.0014081163,0.0008225369,0.8926422,0.00002943214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9469792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96636903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053020775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015884917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14104736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11525369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249590007","doi":"","title":"Invasive plant management following the 2003 Okanagan valley wildfires, British Columbia.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Archaeology; Forestry","score_opus":0.03794107288389214,"score_gpt":0.2794026763144991,"score_spread":0.24146160343060696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249590007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860092,0.001143606,0.000115827446,0.00067154865,0.000045798348,0.000097071774,0.0034597917,0.00002387207,0.008433304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97407734,0.0013682176,0.00042589844,0.0002642312,0.000010578223,0.00006889558,0.0027180433,0.000012653618,0.021054076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997459,0.00001958732,0.000011802299,0.000035948207,0.00007675931,0.000109998255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898344,0.000041168623,0.0001606078,0.000026143773,0.00054461,0.00024400781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034276626,0.00020724189,0.0002196874,0.0007634785,0.0020857637,0.00079149194,0.00085414416,0.00037667056,0.0016546266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079707423,0.00013840287,0.00008679131,0.0011297393,0.00032382802,0.00027001073,0.00064651377,0.0006021618,0.0002706476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006272853,0.00023179008,0.8713834,0.0001608274,0.000086678825,0.0009223618,0.003870754,0.0005924476,0.0037192404,0.00013744351,0.020253034,0.09801476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004916688,0.00002029319,0.99283916,0.000034920125,0.000015380463,0.000053263495,0.0031919917,0.00012881294,0.00017176114,0.000016051245,0.003517267,0.0000061887545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9808156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01918441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009464124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009520745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06866741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249630946","doi":"","title":"A tale of two cedars. International symposium on western redcedar and yellow-cedar, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 24-28 May 2010.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Thuja; Forestry; Archaeology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.01283963653926291,"score_gpt":0.2723053380889261,"score_spread":0.2594657015496632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249630946","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023313232,0.44753727,0.005513933,0.15261534,0.121380456,0.00020262421,0.0049259732,0.00069550093,0.2438157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040710445,0.09462385,0.0037852088,0.007034159,0.0056063854,0.0000661145,0.003277833,0.00022311752,0.844673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995389,0.000039700477,0.000016840502,0.00006635827,0.00020918257,0.00012905752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886155,0.000039744846,0.000030631876,0.000049081606,0.00055286504,0.00046620655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012636532,0.0011367459,0.0005873403,0.0012428648,0.0035478098,0.002507465,0.00089919067,0.0013951875,0.026832867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007260771,0.0004611159,0.0003872928,0.001101108,0.0010333611,0.0012729331,0.0017402538,0.0022098843,0.00940526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014983634,0.000068625726,0.0022886011,0.00011682572,0.000015842536,0.00018891317,0.0002683259,0.00008480339,0.0011396394,0.00056553097,0.8526516,0.14246142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007223014,0.000029038738,0.0072648865,0.00015341741,0.000021688715,0.00012944544,0.0006452779,0.00003806107,0.0003620413,0.00031380777,0.9910222,0.000012915795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34676433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78407234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6532357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028681075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062736473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68949187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469483872","doi":"","title":"Ten-year performance of yellow cedar and interior spruce in southern interior British Columbia, Canada.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Forestry; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009406655396186583,"score_gpt":0.250010519766189,"score_spread":0.24060386437000242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469483872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899884,0.0008183601,0.00006882889,0.00007634279,0.000012113953,0.000018594481,0.0060524475,0.000019804445,0.0029450627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98375547,0.0003976147,0.00013277904,0.000068821035,0.0000027032495,0.000014515069,0.006069674,0.000011254221,0.00954713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960965,0.000030485493,0.000020626927,0.000084753265,0.00009993902,0.0001544904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845433,0.000078059114,0.0001148669,0.000044050183,0.0008393242,0.00046935672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005348231,0.0005555287,0.00043619136,0.00088488206,0.00197253,0.0008807158,0.0010968951,0.0004594329,0.0017030613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007087829,0.00024154002,0.00024730194,0.0013221521,0.0004944338,0.00028592243,0.00047604486,0.00045773658,0.00096594455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005517624,0.00016676763,0.9756738,0.000057399022,0.00014595687,0.0003232878,0.0013927561,0.000457707,0.0039977157,0.000081786275,0.0042842403,0.0128668435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032013538,0.000022490005,0.998021,0.000011239507,0.000016060869,0.000027174758,0.0006038038,0.00009748617,0.00011341989,0.000006454657,0.0010718572,0.0000058636074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99053955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010923569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010923569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007372617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079256356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}