{"meta":{"query_hash":"6efe458e3481","filters":{"venue":"Genomics Society and Policy"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6efe458e3481","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Genomics+Society+and+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W2015377740","doi":"10.1186/1746-5354-5-1-80","title":"Secondary Uses of Personal Data for Population Research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genomics Society and Policy","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Normative; Population; Legislation; Political science; Public relations; Data science; Medicine; Environmental health; Law; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.6770320009466806,"score_gpt":0.6385837395213789,"score_spread":0.038448261425301666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015377740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96374965,0.0009320065,0.00014613009,0.03159735,0.000033826775,0.00048290746,0.00049992313,0.000013274727,0.0025449207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809986,0.0035466505,0.010128696,0.0024726477,0.0009425591,0.000003837519,0.0003173085,0.000012432443,0.0015773138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891764,0.000041630865,0.00021611615,0.00024382127,0.00032946345,0.00025132907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685043,0.0023170104,0.000040268416,0.0004078695,0.00026529,0.00011913639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038986607,0.0000550435,0.00016680914,0.0000476055,0.00016047247,0.000018010816,0.0001861248,0.00023578508,0.000020857686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032196892,0.000051342136,0.00008178097,0.00014844116,0.00024313063,0.00005872587,0.00016815087,0.0007768653,0.0000022293145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015602063,0.0009402695,0.0254832,0.004140098,0.0005373489,0.0000045076627,0.022545,0.000007467347,0.049741626,0.542827,0.10031208,0.25190118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004565018,0.0023314117,0.3022589,0.0002699838,0.00009154918,0.000030005756,0.00330276,0.0073086116,0.0013095067,0.5802723,0.09795144,0.0003085023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003454837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041845808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27677572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072336545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094563933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38545012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111426210","doi":"10.1186/1746-5354-2-3-80","title":"Variability in the storage and use of newborn dried bloodspots in Canada: is it time for national standards?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genomics Society and Policy","topic":"Metabolism and Genetic Disorders","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Duration (music); Political science; Medicine; Business; Law","score_opus":0.008928916444109975,"score_gpt":0.24396757333999713,"score_spread":0.23503865689588715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111426210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99682933,0.00036646234,0.00019286454,0.0011483514,0.000012866302,0.00018609106,0.00095922634,4.767543e-7,0.00030431218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504375,0.00041085694,0.0014320767,0.0026346904,0.00010682688,0.000012725375,0.00008398598,0.0000067960646,0.00026827413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942774,0.00004456946,0.00015505054,0.00015173748,0.000089350026,0.00013154853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972826,0.000054585587,0.000043969067,0.00010203314,0.000050505678,0.000020649048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049888814,0.00007161221,0.000104281535,0.000011944448,0.00003638439,0.000012677987,0.00006408737,0.00006518949,0.0000062929194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006975596,0.000064598105,0.0000355494,0.000060677343,0.00006482225,0.0000026816297,0.00003159412,0.00003736004,4.6050843e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007802356,0.0007035404,0.12033156,0.00066276063,0.0003738255,0.0000019447104,0.0180546,0.004439573,0.25264844,0.019112263,0.5599076,0.022983616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023892778,0.00007064191,0.21325256,0.0000069038515,0.000024753652,0.0000036711492,0.0006482686,0.001487627,0.0041385028,0.006441251,0.77126,0.00027653066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15336373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23255664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24850994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029038818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011923655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8522741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112882285","doi":"10.1186/1746-5354-5-1-1","title":"Big Tobacco and the human genome: driving the scientific bandwagon?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genomics Society and Policy","topic":"Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health; Medical Research Council Canada; Cancer Research UK","keywords":"Bandwagon effect; Tobacco industry; Unit (ring theory); Medical research; Political science; Public health; Lung cancer; Public relations; Medicine; Public administration; Oncology; Psychology; Law; Pathology","score_opus":0.008766465420494056,"score_gpt":0.24722554110301417,"score_spread":0.23845907568252012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112882285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880046,0.0066393646,0.0001012215,0.0043347925,0.00007342838,0.00019718238,0.000027938508,0.0000073576184,0.0006141136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115163,0.0035960972,0.00014141809,0.0030215457,0.0011925513,0.000007821608,0.000055644232,0.00000986607,0.0008234002],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924916,0.000047267025,0.0001336081,0.0002662787,0.00006994774,0.00023376435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994589,0.000015150215,0.000050800445,0.00033456815,0.000041999352,0.00009856203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032472107,0.0001227297,0.000097141674,0.0000153897,0.0009843321,0.00021082969,0.00017957474,0.000085382635,0.0000030453314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002556375,0.0000829035,0.00012331743,0.00008177069,0.00065856637,0.000002898254,0.00011042732,0.00007622368,0.0000015559542],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011482606,0.00015358604,0.005663169,0.00004229858,0.00018506809,9.4629524e-7,0.007291932,0.000049117643,0.9345814,0.020479934,0.011820858,0.01961686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073579317,0.00033608597,0.22285144,0.000021703796,0.00022463582,0.000058470592,0.0034777045,0.00013149,0.017283114,0.048559934,0.6987493,0.0009481712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030143092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029612762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9172983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013202519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100998375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75707865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121241393","doi":"10.1186/1746-5354-3-3-14","title":"Public Health Genomics (PHG): From Scientific Considerations to Ethical Integration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genomics Society and Policy","topic":"Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Public health; Engineering ethics; Genomics; Ethical issues; Personalized medicine; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Genome; Bioinformatics; Engineering; Biology; Genetics; Pathology","score_opus":0.04460399193187091,"score_gpt":0.31569736575709156,"score_spread":0.27109337382522064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121241393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.950882,0.0013515081,0.02523692,0.0213172,0.00023047553,0.00027382368,0.0004010085,0.000018080831,0.0002889485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95680416,0.0008825481,0.015851676,0.024174327,0.0012465181,0.000009558983,0.0008095249,0.000020681571,0.00020100588],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880666,0.000051400188,0.00027099045,0.00040320444,0.00009798056,0.00036975642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898416,0.00003532023,0.00006874603,0.0002982486,0.00014330381,0.00047024558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063274166,0.00013772908,0.0001261628,0.000054753553,0.0005607735,0.00020956817,0.000095075535,0.00026091517,0.0000145084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017136254,0.00015479335,0.00011306672,0.00012324344,0.00022146114,0.0000050722533,0.00010223622,0.00015794196,0.000012313759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007870186,0.00024492943,0.001014068,0.00003929705,0.00012761627,0.0000015622085,0.012562046,0.000068546666,0.8607326,0.025208695,0.08563374,0.014288198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020727438,0.0004277743,0.014019044,0.000020256168,0.000039031507,0.000028634417,0.0039023382,0.00029023283,0.06620816,0.0371758,0.8749708,0.00084518193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023669952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007628095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79452443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011340038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010102623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.631229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135269120","doi":"10.1186/1746-5354-7-1-35","title":"Harmonised consent in international research consortia: an impossible dream?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genomics Society and Policy","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Ontario Institute for Cancer Research","keywords":"Informed consent; Consistency (knowledge bases); Work (physics); Public relations; Inclusion (mineral); Task (project management); Order (exchange); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Political science; Medical education; Business; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Alternative medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.7231395948467667,"score_gpt":0.6104883355199154,"score_spread":0.11265125932685127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135269120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9575992,0.00019793242,0.000022151877,0.012860806,0.0000847581,0.00030627745,0.00003159317,0.000021479029,0.028875781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810408,0.008456124,0.004306096,0.0025524432,0.00042670127,0.00002196429,0.000022106446,0.000021190053,0.0031526121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835986,0.00012187043,0.00032687822,0.0003266772,0.00043452598,0.00043020648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744594,0.0015604529,0.00004133073,0.00032466656,0.0003097227,0.0003179158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040947534,0.00009032748,0.00018357519,0.00012778735,0.00014090362,0.0000433593,0.00022918203,0.00034090318,0.00019804164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020160475,0.00008658811,0.00008968669,0.0002378498,0.0009163081,0.000064107735,0.0002552934,0.001664261,0.000044240565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018147172,0.002317633,0.2764023,0.00059676607,0.00052160496,0.00017790069,0.12575963,0.000004225138,0.04060075,0.53040725,0.010488445,0.010908741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012678611,0.002185778,0.34125337,0.0004073954,0.000056547462,0.00020647829,0.029554052,0.0030358296,0.015223583,0.55411893,0.040554035,0.00072535686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003354867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055385253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096205585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027284777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002112723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72304785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139910854","doi":"10.1186/1746-5354-6-1-15","title":"Sequencing the salmon genome: A deliberative public engagement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genomics Society and Policy","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Genome British Columbia; Genome Canada","keywords":"Public engagement; Democracy; Public value; Event (particle physics); Public relations; Genomics; Political science; Biology; Genome; Politics; Genetics; Law","score_opus":0.02431244013771265,"score_gpt":0.2280224945095464,"score_spread":0.20371005437183376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139910854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98793197,0.000075911965,0.000051179362,0.0053028734,0.00006453343,0.0002008315,0.000028879535,0.000022841303,0.006320979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98771316,0.00082323793,0.0071268384,0.0034748698,0.00016702962,0.000014202006,0.0000071102218,0.000010250815,0.00066327845],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992028,0.00003739608,0.00010509175,0.00023963394,0.00011925952,0.000295847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995926,0.000052182324,0.000053132397,0.00021002328,0.0000029919736,0.00008907586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033701875,0.00013239977,0.00008762516,0.000009017574,0.0010557637,0.00006832624,0.00023800167,0.00006738717,0.00030649037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020901663,0.00010271826,0.00007833163,0.000114547256,0.00070681435,0.000127994,0.0007620812,0.00032041618,0.00022486335],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010711663,0.00010776907,0.18011577,0.000020059802,0.00027702824,0.0000034159868,0.12469459,0.0004018543,0.65738493,0.0053500556,0.01593049,0.015703313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005103849,0.00007605015,0.448049,0.0000019808363,0.000046954126,0.000023453791,0.011835697,0.00046773933,0.0024190592,0.0024898013,0.53357124,0.00050861895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048639672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012122497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6549659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038573518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014414711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8120187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153107331","doi":"10.1186/1746-5354-7-1-20","title":"Structural genomics and the organisation of open science","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genomics Society and Policy","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"Brookhaven National Laboratory; Argonne National Laboratory; SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory; High Energy Physics; RIKEN; Hokkaido University; University of California, San Diego; University College London; University of Toronto; Case Western Reserve University; Karolinska Institutet; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; University of Miami; University of Oxford; Northwestern University","keywords":"Open science; Intellectual property; Genomics; Engineering ethics; Field (mathematics); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Scientific field; Structural genomics; Data science; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Biology; Engineering; Computer science; Genome; Work (physics); Genetics","score_opus":0.014565036290954828,"score_gpt":0.2951044645618776,"score_spread":0.28053942827092276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153107331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978624,0.0005387708,0.000565013,0.00012711219,0.000030714098,0.00011887836,0.000008769641,0.0000016762921,0.0007466506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953999,0.0010650859,0.0031525514,0.00022763482,0.000092451424,0.000002154351,0.0000038079927,0.0000062296967,0.000050185583],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963856,0.000007723908,0.00008612284,0.00013028336,0.00003153777,0.000105773855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974877,0.0000051479055,0.000036451893,0.00014903738,0.00002348378,0.000037123897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022509617,0.000058497935,0.00007010131,0.00000958051,0.00012807306,0.000031627693,0.0002460877,0.000039911407,0.0000031619065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017850287,0.000044980487,0.000026130798,0.000050784594,0.00045460023,0.0000043427654,0.00040617163,0.000032773845,2.4276198e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005950358,0.000005407067,0.0012815314,0.000021269761,0.000044465156,5.0526328e-8,0.014677012,0.00006143476,0.9641521,0.014713306,0.00009678591,0.00488714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027143732,0.00017315552,0.05358063,0.000005928083,0.00005504895,0.00005331648,0.003810571,0.002629846,0.9195996,0.009578315,0.0074307416,0.00036846177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024776082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010779818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052299097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000104877345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012483813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1834251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}