{"meta":{"query_hash":"54390db30124","filters":{"venue":"German Law Journal"},"cohort_total":66,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":66,"exported":66,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/54390db30124","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=German+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W105928197","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200002613","title":"The European Court of Justice and “Total Market” Thinking","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Victory; Economic Justice; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Law; European Union law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.01391612822489121,"score_gpt":0.2771033505748997,"score_spread":0.2631872223500085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105928197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009579221,0.0135163525,0.005519273,0.22850657,0.002153148,0.000031761552,0.00009697075,0.000035715857,0.740561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7619856,0.0052808933,0.0037195822,0.14958134,0.004153885,0.00015392016,0.0001275224,0.00014778574,0.074849516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843106,0.006506354,0.000447375,0.0027040674,0.003688673,0.002342876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932787,0.0038785462,0.0003518752,0.00065710174,0.0011544401,0.00067927607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017254837,0.00069013785,0.0007955347,0.0031621438,0.011530845,0.022931043,0.0029783668,0.018732795,0.0102127595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019436058,0.00039702022,0.0012873325,0.0027775036,0.040934805,0.017226802,0.0063402164,0.015583874,0.0009890859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011437152,0.0000027672434,0.000011555059,0.0000037364323,0.0000011270417,0.000009998944,0.00013976963,0.000032671505,0.000003511222,0.9956456,0.0036270707,0.0005211133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001038483,0.000003274448,0.00007500145,0.000109929926,0.0000041699336,0.000020539052,0.00052978797,0.00026733452,0.000024641999,0.9428875,0.056058973,0.000008502503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021795629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016166246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022931043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021286085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011653604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15444207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W121275545","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001437","title":"Teaching “Human Rights in Africa” Transnationally: Reflections on the Jos-Osgoode Virtual Classroom Experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Institution; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Plateau (mathematics); Sociology","score_opus":0.08648714055631132,"score_gpt":0.4336545503878741,"score_spread":0.3471674098315628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W121275545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8398715,0.0024260061,0.0027006906,0.030673763,0.0016770137,0.00013858473,0.00003099057,0.00007574165,0.12240568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544066,0.0015708295,0.0013229969,0.003942751,0.00015617975,0.00011213485,0.000015499754,0.00008663622,0.03838625],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946938,0.0036246593,0.00007879638,0.00025452135,0.0002980638,0.0010500085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536926,0.0023235553,0.00018614875,0.00014666306,0.00016274923,0.0018114852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075440137,0.0006649322,0.0006219148,0.0008775878,0.029542256,0.011643661,0.0014391067,0.0036084242,0.009500568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007302194,0.0005792196,0.00036875973,0.0006518899,0.0152422935,0.007903403,0.013490058,0.008534428,0.00088780455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045946403,0.00035632798,0.0011743465,0.00008817196,0.0000038812796,0.0022682615,0.9606028,0.000066204855,0.00080755923,0.016487703,0.006456572,0.01164223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016472977,0.00011017814,0.0008053191,0.00019030123,0.0000043539617,0.0006278078,0.87190026,0.00006679106,0.00035959075,0.0015294504,0.124373175,0.000016335605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004905762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029542256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029478061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035299067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039897025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1233816891","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200005125","title":"Discrimination in Individual-Related Employment – A View from Europe and Germany to Canada, analysing the Requirements and the Background of the European Anti-Discrimination Directives","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Member states; Law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; European union; Economic policy","score_opus":0.0378125544276793,"score_gpt":0.31782198847985343,"score_spread":0.28000943405217416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1233816891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27066866,0.061232753,0.0013237252,0.18300216,0.0010153982,0.00004378301,0.0003259194,0.00004170901,0.4823459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351971,0.015148429,0.0006227435,0.02252014,0.00014260825,0.000015998095,0.000069884474,0.000026420283,0.02625659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679416,0.00031151847,0.00006205061,0.00024089139,0.0008838094,0.0017075144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985807,0.00025911882,0.0000910628,0.00003798148,0.0005852411,0.00044596443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021414103,0.00034956323,0.0003702138,0.0028214506,0.015989816,0.010029518,0.0017457919,0.0045979535,0.0025564812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027394982,0.0001990121,0.00044028988,0.004445331,0.018477371,0.002239209,0.0022845762,0.0032040349,0.00014355018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040162202,0.00004324233,0.0042015603,0.00012184079,0.00002227088,0.00047555656,0.039070178,0.0005074362,0.0003009756,0.90298647,0.025858954,0.02637126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029522853,0.000038592116,0.045688897,0.0013543968,0.00006464288,0.00034494817,0.10119051,0.0008764397,0.0005874505,0.06487102,0.78480625,0.00014730307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98734003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107630365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.107630365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.109616295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7809166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141455327","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200000997","title":"<i>Book Review</i>- Ed Morgan,<i>The Aesthetics of International Law</i>(2007) - [Ed Morgan, The Aesthetics of International Law (2007), University of Toronto Press: Toronto, ISBN: 978–08020-9251-9, pp.272]","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Media studies; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.011110204995222372,"score_gpt":0.2205017756679592,"score_spread":0.20939157067273684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141455327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045020675,0.4261131,0.00102175,0.023470502,0.02192536,0.00006421309,0.00074121106,0.00018871938,0.52602494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046955682,0.27692226,0.0009408774,0.010681063,0.010346899,0.000076445314,0.0012148254,0.00030832947,0.6948137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937844,0.00006769255,0.000027571134,0.00006494154,0.00042308046,0.000038274862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845886,0.0005182203,0.000110747824,0.00006782351,0.00074432994,0.00010005843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003663817,0.00087618374,0.000845322,0.0034632755,0.001543611,0.004355971,0.0008198344,0.0011186566,0.09852274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002484378,0.0003215742,0.00048183592,0.0074433936,0.0012380022,0.0035396111,0.0008563668,0.002305157,0.055043545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029311757,0.0000055435944,0.000025764635,0.00023571918,0.0000019050492,0.00001906424,0.00008533398,0.000047011297,0.000044819113,0.004383298,0.9506622,0.04448647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.950174e-7,0.0000025728748,0.00010605583,0.0003237166,0.0000014078588,0.00004287724,0.00006217279,0.000010054881,0.000013895187,0.00082565885,0.9986083,0.000002711789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012409524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022883225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09852274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029418431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033954375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3295914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500769656","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200018964","title":"Fundamental Freedoms, Fundamental Rights, and the Scope of Free Movement Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Charter; International human rights law; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.012874438950091894,"score_gpt":0.27751693541321987,"score_spread":0.264642496463128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500769656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043635175,0.015663099,0.073688276,0.041753527,0.0005622451,0.00008391248,0.00017696417,0.00009044714,0.82434636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96367544,0.004879565,0.009853844,0.004094352,0.0010125496,0.00025017155,0.00011354165,0.00006061217,0.016059883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99012274,0.0046827826,0.00035623426,0.0014816464,0.0018841197,0.001472472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99093103,0.0063859313,0.00062706956,0.0012095623,0.00041795112,0.00042851345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011834827,0.00055047916,0.000988015,0.0024692381,0.005013804,0.0099657895,0.001700729,0.0067742993,0.0051778015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010589916,0.00038272748,0.0011865377,0.0016171541,0.056077536,0.012542942,0.007536712,0.008687969,0.0005464934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010091003,0.0000020147556,0.000019141957,0.000004426943,6.0100206e-7,0.0000057423954,0.00011570166,0.000056867175,0.000009953016,0.9991769,0.0001341647,0.00047343422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003568348,0.0000025202708,0.000066782246,0.000029095094,9.780789e-7,0.000009190537,0.00007793985,0.0001263726,0.00001835771,0.9947929,0.0048695523,0.0000028701672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029647283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017818223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011834827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005649538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004300507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06258929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509905651","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200020642","title":"Interest-Balancing vs. Fiduciary Duty: Two Models for National Security Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Duty; Political science; Human rights; Balance (ability); Public interest; Torture; National security; State (computer science); Enforcement; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04970016788889059,"score_gpt":0.3642283763617564,"score_spread":0.31452820847286583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509905651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024275389,0.0047575613,0.12250913,0.08714605,0.0007954099,0.00010651463,0.0001158868,0.00008453374,0.7602095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9353649,0.0019679414,0.016768318,0.011789675,0.0009058697,0.0004134184,0.000059218517,0.000106475476,0.03262408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934296,0.0034293716,0.00015817018,0.0007689604,0.0013843459,0.0008294135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957813,0.0021319713,0.00043546598,0.0006877465,0.00044053653,0.0005230388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009913927,0.0007136467,0.00088404724,0.0020749895,0.0057208706,0.012642948,0.0028614197,0.010730038,0.00856699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011046637,0.0006233176,0.0014427615,0.0017732565,0.038685758,0.021971613,0.0073604477,0.010464967,0.0014281757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002302459,0.0000029110388,0.000012292499,0.0000021949838,3.4030975e-7,0.000004641493,0.00022767807,0.000043133885,0.000006280304,0.9990175,0.00028876498,0.00039195406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009592688,0.0000050750423,0.00003880843,0.000032609398,0.0000019982515,0.000017905593,0.00023650889,0.00055899034,0.000022773042,0.99188095,0.0071894038,0.000005400469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004547139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003346062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012642948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01073415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046571805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07788211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530569893","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001474","title":"Canadian Legal Ethics: Ready for the Twenty-First Century at Last","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal ethics; Political science; Legal education; Legal profession; Legal realism; Law; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Public administration","score_opus":0.07947018377858342,"score_gpt":0.3855986025917223,"score_spread":0.3061284188131389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530569893","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012805301,0.09828889,0.002218443,0.71269387,0.0043634265,0.000025256426,0.00020451886,0.00009943689,0.16930096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6260279,0.10025629,0.007103437,0.09863386,0.002681973,0.000087352186,0.00029041935,0.00018372187,0.16473508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98730266,0.0020055005,0.00021054097,0.00079237693,0.0069522667,0.0027366611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98409677,0.0015441367,0.00046606417,0.00046469917,0.008949857,0.0044784723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066224257,0.0005975794,0.00070973026,0.0030628373,0.02189294,0.018376656,0.001859094,0.005206517,0.007098922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012887662,0.00030300344,0.0004004089,0.0052872794,0.043091625,0.006058674,0.004437507,0.006392387,0.00069479697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027762238,0.000020807436,0.0018776794,0.00018689566,0.000012090002,0.00017941897,0.02446917,0.0002196355,0.0001690877,0.7381185,0.17604437,0.058674548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005952954,0.000006643762,0.0024441876,0.0003310351,0.000008645199,0.000070413684,0.011598923,0.000109085886,0.000079276266,0.03936941,0.94594884,0.000027636313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97992843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75025207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24974795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39926374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87018603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538824565","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017946","title":"Canadian Mining Companies and Domestic Law Reform: A Critical Legal Account*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Government (linguistics); Public administration; State (computer science); Political science; Civil society; Parliament; Law reform; Corporate law; Law; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Corporate governance; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.010653906808134236,"score_gpt":0.24674446117421478,"score_spread":0.23609055436608054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538824565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022967815,0.028879043,0.00095729326,0.34424186,0.0009943065,0.000081510705,0.00034580802,0.000066225904,0.6014661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7449991,0.031461895,0.002375852,0.109943405,0.0009524538,0.00015680728,0.00032935033,0.00016298956,0.109618135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873126,0.0012069338,0.00018572621,0.0007717771,0.005376958,0.005145971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886524,0.002983099,0.0005422642,0.00046603568,0.005989689,0.0013664684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060810084,0.00074641587,0.000801362,0.007065277,0.04829508,0.02135986,0.004849808,0.01419232,0.010984084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017875154,0.00068391516,0.00075104897,0.011028342,0.025737977,0.0067574275,0.0056115394,0.009972114,0.0005752586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011887079,0.000018204591,0.00094979623,0.00008404691,0.000008246268,0.00021299925,0.0056994297,0.0002664868,0.00007478031,0.90204626,0.080994725,0.009633242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000384197,0.00001564795,0.0072694467,0.00068840635,0.000059392376,0.00018672849,0.021935988,0.0012308084,0.00036142586,0.09015899,0.8779318,0.00012303266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29050767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29050767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31882972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82291055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551813341","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017958","title":"The Equator Principles: Evaluating the Exposure of Commercial Lenders to Socio-Environmental Risk","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Project finance; Context (archaeology); Business; Risk management; Risk analysis (engineering); Finance","score_opus":0.07642939184365957,"score_gpt":0.3198428286109884,"score_spread":0.24341343676732882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551813341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91596466,0.0003344403,0.022090286,0.0007964404,0.000029574618,0.00067043246,0.0008511603,0.000049382143,0.05921358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990096,0.00024296927,0.007215989,0.00013614247,0.000029173403,0.00026440196,0.00033904426,0.000014651008,0.0016617465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830755,0.008098071,0.0015902607,0.0010424983,0.00552697,0.0006665969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93627363,0.036541272,0.017375046,0.0033521936,0.00453027,0.0019276437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020581253,0.000518515,0.0007309292,0.0034167594,0.00096890226,0.00398788,0.0006894479,0.001578274,0.0046849432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086947106,0.0002974538,0.0008865944,0.0024709008,0.0049907225,0.005555794,0.0053367317,0.0014035505,0.00048396346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015827621,0.0004830387,0.8704957,0.00025339882,0.00038128215,0.0006924807,0.0077833314,0.010086655,0.0010525085,0.04731823,0.0028348137,0.057035826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017162958,0.0028667552,0.8623547,0.00020074201,0.00029258698,0.00094153755,0.015382877,0.02311189,0.0026000899,0.07084044,0.021099815,0.00013692719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004115861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025261478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020581253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001400583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012795909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10884541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586402922","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200018782","title":"Book Reviews, The Common Law Tort of Defamation, and the Suppression of Scholarly Debate","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Complaint; Tort; Academic freedom; Law; Political science; Cause of action; Action (physics); Work (physics); Sociology; Plaintiff; Higher education; Engineering","score_opus":0.015841370395712293,"score_gpt":0.31296752139690026,"score_spread":0.29712615100118794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586402922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025404813,0.036584273,0.0018709825,0.22964549,0.0019203803,0.0000709898,0.00014024768,0.00013154173,0.70423126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.688676,0.011990681,0.0012846192,0.06249875,0.0025403402,0.00011638769,0.00010691024,0.00015965808,0.23262666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98093367,0.006613514,0.0005838112,0.0016614238,0.007446507,0.0027610562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9552685,0.026528243,0.00395009,0.0037430935,0.0076602423,0.0028498175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013491529,0.00035428503,0.0005034121,0.002732367,0.021087976,0.018637737,0.0020801954,0.01183515,0.007877131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053792056,0.00042583872,0.0004472225,0.0035865526,0.03397095,0.00552964,0.004430437,0.005300788,0.0012478556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020453026,0.000010058594,0.0005364932,0.00007114924,0.000008922357,0.0002661493,0.0066884663,0.00009493412,0.00016678085,0.8672992,0.10957672,0.015260746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018872955,0.000018215735,0.0020228948,0.00033515994,0.00002497165,0.00020068989,0.004603534,0.00017966065,0.0004106461,0.072436206,0.9197039,0.000045320437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23681022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31127396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23681022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01750968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03283512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47086364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161718753","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200005009","title":"Redefining the Traditional Pillars of German Legal Studies and Setting the Stage for Contemporary Interdisciplinary Research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Law and Political Science","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"German; Scholarship; Political science; Politics; Legal research; Product (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Public administration; History","score_opus":0.18630624683551744,"score_gpt":0.46592471063961793,"score_spread":0.2796184638041005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161718753","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048611123,0.14689267,0.046628267,0.42620674,0.003205221,0.000072908166,0.0001325419,0.000117035546,0.32813343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.893963,0.05409185,0.012690624,0.019791849,0.0024320912,0.00016685105,0.00007096,0.00006107568,0.016731743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99184483,0.005165892,0.00034611713,0.00057778606,0.0013669551,0.0006984321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936407,0.003481692,0.00067053374,0.00094838307,0.00081346405,0.0004451069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013558099,0.0007507871,0.00061319774,0.0054622814,0.0053782305,0.014739697,0.0015334396,0.0037577103,0.0018621791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009260783,0.0004501128,0.00029784968,0.006334889,0.05934086,0.0144031225,0.005472089,0.0041024573,0.00044022175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020843977,0.0000024943788,0.00007777366,0.000018283034,0.0000013094043,0.00001034554,0.0020135646,0.00004017876,0.000026755533,0.99267733,0.0013701132,0.0037597609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010468681,0.000011635844,0.0010425517,0.00042121846,0.000008022973,0.000056869943,0.008798199,0.00046451433,0.0001567064,0.80232084,0.18669447,0.000014338086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013019547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019325253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01583552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01583552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010013953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114895284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1687988153","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200012670","title":"Slaughterhouse-Six: Updating the Law of War","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"American Political and Social Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Rationality; Normative; Law; Creatures; Spanish Civil War; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014961580807742332,"score_gpt":0.24408131949950615,"score_spread":0.22911973869176383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1687988153","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010451063,0.014349158,0.010849713,0.5795274,0.02906373,0.00006850396,0.00019300284,0.00033860456,0.35515893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42988595,0.013908904,0.0166397,0.23934418,0.016763601,0.00016211535,0.0003440481,0.0006847802,0.28226668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885861,0.004999977,0.00075197074,0.0012968947,0.0029649178,0.0014001114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821697,0.008062716,0.00071888143,0.0022063996,0.0051654573,0.0016768682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021725282,0.00047474404,0.00042704464,0.0023202267,0.008788907,0.015791267,0.0028494233,0.014063065,0.014066061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05376262,0.00047955135,0.00046048342,0.0012536299,0.01993974,0.026680479,0.008425349,0.015873777,0.0030184602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018499904,0.000025947737,0.00039247776,0.00006216341,0.0000042646634,0.00012369333,0.0055769174,0.00023098863,0.00011993469,0.7452116,0.20570269,0.0425308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075700755,0.000019336137,0.00027582957,0.00034685084,0.000005537498,0.00004725039,0.0031595076,0.00018296466,0.00022537578,0.1063685,0.8893336,0.00002771449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027410716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04904108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027410716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009049755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011819801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11489564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W169302879","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200002674","title":"Transnational Legal Discourse: Reflections on My Time with the German Law Journal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"German; Scholarship; Political science; Law; Audience measurement; Supreme court; Legal education; Politics; Legal profession; Legal realism; Sociology; Media studies; History","score_opus":0.033020544362927035,"score_gpt":0.37860747092951114,"score_spread":0.3455869265665841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W169302879","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10126427,0.04030637,0.00075014716,0.66184455,0.005448285,0.000024786616,0.00009731851,0.0000650451,0.1901992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8640282,0.010249179,0.00032196695,0.09425437,0.0031155094,0.000057948764,0.000060471742,0.0001694672,0.027742783],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736651,0.016428756,0.00066739565,0.0015692186,0.0033247077,0.004344832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97402054,0.014136258,0.0023601279,0.00084659265,0.0027898236,0.005846614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02186673,0.0005456351,0.0008646078,0.0031714102,0.041252706,0.041109882,0.0025562614,0.013366419,0.008188878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03221625,0.0008118911,0.00052595994,0.005695234,0.04713273,0.026336309,0.018893652,0.014022951,0.0015244372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032114014,0.00004459699,0.0010646563,0.00010685986,0.000012217094,0.001193007,0.6600206,0.00002827597,0.00013241934,0.22651377,0.10356641,0.0072851004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013988959,0.0000143246725,0.0010323739,0.0002915484,0.0000058767932,0.0004037817,0.57019335,0.00003586382,0.00006123549,0.010889975,0.41702926,0.000028428713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028277956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03237925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041252706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019538216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0109004965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14176035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1773203579","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200013122","title":"Ideas, Institutions and the Exhaustion of<i>Modell Deutschland?</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Capitalism; Supervisory board; Ackermann function; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Politics; Management; Sociology; Economic history; History; Economics","score_opus":0.017856500188604484,"score_gpt":0.23044180882651494,"score_spread":0.21258530863791045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1773203579","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016901001,0.03432627,0.0030638087,0.5764536,0.005699317,0.000011489424,0.00013123518,0.00008866548,0.3633246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.844759,0.015001759,0.0010389357,0.06653838,0.0037857497,0.000044417488,0.00010078709,0.00015755811,0.06857344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793506,0.0009522551,0.00006215417,0.00030310467,0.00033068578,0.0004167888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988813,0.00049474026,0.00015729839,0.00012407835,0.00017239377,0.00017018232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029620316,0.00040533338,0.00031734598,0.001414061,0.0058907755,0.017712887,0.0010209933,0.004029436,0.006346095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003623586,0.0002961654,0.00028965063,0.0011528839,0.018374816,0.011782961,0.0037812577,0.004110468,0.0009005217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066842517,0.000004698117,0.00009996041,0.0000112303815,0.0000027840124,0.000021534517,0.0027580287,0.000060827588,0.000022590353,0.96031135,0.034221347,0.0024789213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000114977165,0.000011988753,0.0007774415,0.00022736134,0.000007751365,0.000065956134,0.007673779,0.00048141487,0.00011004169,0.34781015,0.6428,0.000022514227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026948424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032926966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026948424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010630377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040482427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077129185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849900527","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200018769","title":"A Viking We Will Go! Neo-Corporatism and Social Europe","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Single market; Economics; Politics; European integration; Restructuring; Free trade; European union; Liberalization; Political economy; Market economy; Political science; Economy; International trade; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.020163727169367773,"score_gpt":0.2987029216835848,"score_spread":0.27853919451421705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1849900527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04531764,0.013122995,0.0060176873,0.13368995,0.0010611349,0.00002740789,0.00003983613,0.00005368636,0.8006695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88741094,0.00241739,0.001775272,0.043726154,0.00048449644,0.000106187385,0.00002392738,0.000051304076,0.0640043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954609,0.0022954145,0.000082267594,0.0005832742,0.00075188954,0.00082628144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986871,0.0006766356,0.00014342302,0.0002433847,0.00012253638,0.00012691437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034604378,0.000245464,0.00026512335,0.0006141236,0.006626658,0.0074768043,0.00068275497,0.0071156896,0.0033710648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005339623,0.00018816738,0.00038021803,0.0007283866,0.022435509,0.005484214,0.0042588213,0.004687261,0.0004712096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020214468,0.0000029620178,0.000070698385,0.000003303503,8.923155e-7,0.00001722571,0.00094498415,0.000023869752,0.00001129218,0.9939693,0.003192777,0.0017607044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017377328,0.00001721369,0.000698849,0.00019344968,0.000004456394,0.000097134485,0.0017353349,0.0002308239,0.00015075017,0.5991936,0.39764476,0.000016303424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009155345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012225787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009155345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004321094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034858203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031351924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189986100","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001486","title":"Nurturing Commitment in the Legal Profession: Student Experiences with the Osgoode Public Interest Requirement","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Political science; Law; Public interest; Legal profession; Work (physics); Practice of law; Legal education; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09629140431203458,"score_gpt":0.43894372862530706,"score_spread":0.34265232431327247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189986100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793255,0.00042832564,0.0004073302,0.010263809,0.0003338114,0.00008384374,0.000025943773,0.000039237973,0.009092295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758381,0.0007454478,0.00066223077,0.0064659356,0.00010628006,0.00007979884,0.000049942744,0.000097636475,0.015954565],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98882407,0.005006406,0.00027401478,0.000731111,0.0019686136,0.0031957303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980977,0.0039354535,0.0012246697,0.0005462885,0.002266017,0.011050682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010113241,0.000943822,0.0013568851,0.001572561,0.036203664,0.017061735,0.00390921,0.006309373,0.00597451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019010575,0.001728802,0.0009100452,0.001405425,0.018538008,0.008129698,0.018291093,0.015875237,0.0012678052],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033795484,0.0005489115,0.006038375,0.00004925272,0.000008444738,0.001165824,0.9781773,0.00003193184,0.0003785469,0.001317586,0.0058045653,0.006445367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008294215,0.00017877556,0.0024825926,0.000056437944,0.0000056492304,0.0004237083,0.97189796,0.0000851135,0.00018449254,0.00028008583,0.024364837,0.000032083273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030793056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08228201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036203664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007969018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009454166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06122768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W197470741","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200000213","title":"Book Review - Jean McKenzie Leiper's <i>Bar Codes: Women in the Legal Profession</i> - [Jean McKenzie Leiper, Bar Codes: Women in the Legal Profession, UBC Press, Toronto, 2006, ISBN 978–0-7748-1320-4, pp. 242, $29.99]","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Bar (unit); Law; Political science; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.028694112820108496,"score_gpt":0.34755778768745355,"score_spread":0.31886367486734507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W197470741","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003791817,0.50896496,0.0009279265,0.067249104,0.041904736,0.00012069605,0.0013623866,0.0002591999,0.37883174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025012104,0.28452447,0.0006364118,0.0172442,0.012241266,0.00008523813,0.0012068016,0.00018435628,0.681376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991622,0.000070789596,0.00003261174,0.000071695125,0.0006175259,0.000045081866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974138,0.00080483785,0.0001650207,0.00006297421,0.001328132,0.00022529384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059080665,0.0008423224,0.000938163,0.0028602825,0.0008923231,0.0025974063,0.0010383764,0.0018332187,0.11450749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00396851,0.00028963297,0.00035381754,0.005316634,0.00078872574,0.0031006814,0.0010484738,0.0020542147,0.07403812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017968365,0.0000027205706,0.000010086537,0.0001706425,8.177239e-7,0.000009882291,0.000027371938,0.000013129818,0.00002822571,0.0007498806,0.97432464,0.024660675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.733891e-7,0.0000032911682,0.00009985434,0.0002932792,0.0000013317854,0.000054647924,0.000031871197,0.000006324599,0.000016651582,0.0002845253,0.9992047,0.0000026091657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011427342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026891692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11450749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025581806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004102956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38306576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119180133","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200012426","title":"Coalition Procurement for the Reconstruction of Iraq in the Crosshairs of WTO Law: The Obligations of the United States under the WTO Government Procurement Agreement","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Law; Procurement; Competition (biology); Government (linguistics); Government procurement; State (computer science); Political science; International trade law; Sovereignty; Public international law; International economic law; Sovereign state; Conflict of laws; International trade; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.026264210006001047,"score_gpt":0.25541628950525186,"score_spread":0.22915207949925082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119180133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04005732,0.017500341,0.004239469,0.46195844,0.0054604397,0.0001489496,0.00029192836,0.00012635512,0.47021666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5816911,0.012441649,0.00603856,0.14052965,0.0017814033,0.00022459317,0.00037459354,0.00021315177,0.2567052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761343,0.0010059503,0.00008938506,0.00017688506,0.0005515997,0.0005627816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819535,0.0007746521,0.00015707109,0.00014822003,0.0004890788,0.00023566754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006644584,0.00047493912,0.00021658865,0.0005669592,0.009263391,0.011658219,0.0010114489,0.008035012,0.009959995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076577244,0.00031651626,0.00037281145,0.00079840084,0.006446994,0.005674655,0.0045223697,0.007125881,0.0015423966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032134798,0.000054408392,0.0012749732,0.0000619561,0.0000090612275,0.00065378926,0.007430398,0.00039162312,0.00039036936,0.7004123,0.26155257,0.027736483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000095752075,0.000015218188,0.0019651062,0.00037009094,0.00000635502,0.00012535158,0.009389578,0.000354204,0.0003174283,0.034306422,0.95311284,0.000027917193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065149225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070956156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065149225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066580265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01479118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12954003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21605983","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001498","title":"Student Participation in Legal Education in Germany and Europe","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bologna Process; Curriculum; Political science; Parliament; German; Competence (human resources); Legal education; Higher education; Public relations; Pedagogy; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02568255837110394,"score_gpt":0.4457869831115504,"score_spread":0.42010442474044646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21605983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96989125,0.001532334,0.00017397541,0.0052936557,0.00014773862,0.0000147154005,0.00020874242,0.000019338195,0.022718225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409926,0.000354115,0.000051253006,0.00046593085,0.00002837216,0.0000075692615,0.00011375662,0.0000056423837,0.004874211],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958781,0.0011064013,0.00018178528,0.00045527396,0.000748701,0.0016296619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99625,0.0006248777,0.0006137485,0.00012940212,0.00025461853,0.002127314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033958633,0.00017731839,0.00034126072,0.0021380933,0.0016281961,0.004263001,0.00062426674,0.0015252299,0.0057275523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047743297,0.00015730316,0.00028442655,0.0024187036,0.0022683449,0.0019086784,0.0048847217,0.0011404303,0.00050295214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006579445,0.0011835468,0.52704453,0.0003222718,0.0001728755,0.0016697366,0.06924688,0.00089362793,0.0012031589,0.12329502,0.028017875,0.24629262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060896025,0.00030470785,0.7843972,0.00040674815,0.000037010053,0.0010341502,0.038674023,0.000865564,0.0007979548,0.0035810843,0.1697641,0.00007662089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011918604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009281539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011918604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027432393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002443804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02369845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197411641","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200020630","title":"From Theory to Practice: Exploring the Relevance of the Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations (DARIO)—The Responsibility of the WTO and the UN","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Political science; International law; Relevance (law); Subject (documents); General assembly; Competition (biology); Law; Public international law; Work (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.021284798362751062,"score_gpt":0.30572368601372685,"score_spread":0.2844388876509758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197411641","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2333365,0.014590093,0.058071528,0.3624691,0.0025574209,0.0018073719,0.00021191585,0.000077442,0.32687858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96909034,0.0031372288,0.010831328,0.013455684,0.00022237089,0.0011404705,0.000073438736,0.000067388486,0.0019818272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6316045,0.31482527,0.007693999,0.009242062,0.03035469,0.0062795905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27462354,0.66349953,0.017289223,0.013157433,0.02729075,0.0041395403],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.26507908,0.0012374229,0.0015495657,0.013217386,0.01714335,0.04208771,0.006904038,0.012615911,0.005300708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48006848,0.0013406504,0.0010988824,0.012415183,0.106610015,0.044799834,0.018554768,0.019672321,0.0008254168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052371775,0.00014393801,0.0044916356,0.0009373316,0.000046370773,0.00043416093,0.3618612,0.00041402216,0.00009852032,0.603266,0.004862863,0.023391627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116730305,0.00021717623,0.0030067253,0.0066418415,0.00007541161,0.00017846056,0.50364107,0.0018020835,0.00032229302,0.43951923,0.044431064,0.000047960693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007149894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009228637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26507908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049554918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052666184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9062883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252546294","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017971","title":"Do Lenders Make Effective Regulators? An Assessment of the Equator Principles on Project Finance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Project finance; Finance; Compliance (psychology); Business; Public finance; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.052455260200587446,"score_gpt":0.3436593265213931,"score_spread":0.29120406632080564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252546294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05426577,0.010398814,0.041265056,0.3599853,0.0008024865,0.00035677123,0.0002462091,0.00012958492,0.53255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89269114,0.015557743,0.016486272,0.03061247,0.002091682,0.00074189174,0.00009974208,0.00015079489,0.041568156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9600382,0.02143421,0.0016379078,0.0020487802,0.010612686,0.0042282403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90742195,0.06499028,0.008944003,0.005277775,0.010587495,0.0027785224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0571233,0.0005753011,0.0013442469,0.0032009843,0.007384914,0.024375428,0.0021749258,0.0142958015,0.008551827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.121064395,0.0009297981,0.0011146984,0.0032011166,0.028707331,0.025121406,0.008294422,0.00887011,0.0011920535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015681806,0.000019719575,0.0008514024,0.000045603567,0.0000052954892,0.00004987,0.0007527233,0.00033327713,0.000039167906,0.98937744,0.0032258183,0.005284081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008725285,0.00004317616,0.0026797643,0.00041819306,0.00002592904,0.000071774426,0.0024423702,0.0016738151,0.00027899936,0.85232306,0.13992208,0.00003358736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011734853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008406051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0571233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008351647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017315496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30210054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261920639","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200013109","title":"National Courts, Global Cartels: F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd. v. Empagran, S.A. (U.S. Supreme Court 2004)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Supreme court; Cartel; Law; Damages; Plaintiff; Political science; Enforcement; Conflict of laws; Economics; Law and economics; Jurisdiction; Incentive","score_opus":0.023313877182919315,"score_gpt":0.25081209850065495,"score_spread":0.22749822131773562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261920639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024136497,0.0133695295,0.0015316996,0.1045441,0.0020644045,0.00012502272,0.0030066154,0.0002201686,0.851002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22773215,0.0041801613,0.0015216961,0.2236227,0.0006942343,0.00028549918,0.00129464,0.00009126515,0.5405777],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880385,0.00017270622,0.000054905733,0.00024103775,0.0003837001,0.00034370588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993272,0.000282294,0.00005896811,0.000038321763,0.00022013737,0.000073159754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016642943,0.0007282683,0.0003235731,0.0009918171,0.0067938305,0.005575136,0.0014893281,0.01318011,0.02077083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036460632,0.0005767846,0.0007045681,0.0012187475,0.0013844412,0.002827056,0.0012751392,0.0059932265,0.0034956266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006205044,0.000059613147,0.0021070368,0.00006848233,0.000028397902,0.0008260561,0.00090066757,0.00024291877,0.00039883403,0.2095964,0.77085376,0.014855901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008309033,0.000051708004,0.010226725,0.00041509164,0.00007920599,0.00050316675,0.0013732798,0.0005571552,0.0009098666,0.026825538,0.9588901,0.0000850507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18430132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3896071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18430132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063467473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008191577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3664571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329083518","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200014139","title":"Comparative Law's Coming of Age? Twenty Years after<i>Critical Comparisons</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Nothing; Law; Casual; Mythology; Political science; History; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Classics","score_opus":0.053437425556907815,"score_gpt":0.39635652600874577,"score_spread":0.34291910045183793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329083518","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01041273,0.10515596,0.0055917334,0.7301552,0.02314109,0.00003580363,0.000081877435,0.00007660999,0.125349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62967527,0.061063908,0.007210629,0.16070578,0.054393027,0.0003477186,0.00018922827,0.00041939807,0.085995056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895852,0.007179145,0.00019819228,0.00070512434,0.0016458563,0.0006864661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840236,0.011303757,0.0009594389,0.0007436605,0.0020652884,0.00090437086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009725343,0.0005437292,0.0006304411,0.0026312885,0.010112954,0.019866351,0.0013815529,0.0054895114,0.0071436544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026662787,0.00024716335,0.00041703065,0.00283713,0.02943984,0.022530856,0.0042687734,0.010349327,0.00094511686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015847572,0.000016659507,0.0001311696,0.00009478168,0.0000042606002,0.000100712794,0.011010876,0.00002825108,0.000061031824,0.9103192,0.06457628,0.013640859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007276489,0.000023184875,0.0003588121,0.00079294684,0.000004565477,0.00014653878,0.02149733,0.00008975968,0.00017683995,0.30322814,0.67365533,0.000019244082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040773344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004126646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019866351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105949845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061108232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07687229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25228476","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200018630","title":"<i>Review Essay</i>– Fuyuki Kurasawa's, The Work of Global Justice: Human Rights as Practices (2007) - [Fuyuki Kurasawa, The Work of Global Justice – Human Rights as Practices (Cambridge University Press, 2007); ISBN: 9780521673914; 256 pp.; $31.99 Paperback]","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Global justice; Solidarity; Politics; Sociology; Globalization; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018926398678755927,"score_gpt":0.3412748121562347,"score_spread":0.3223484134774787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25228476","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046381025,0.8229899,0.0012458843,0.06472915,0.051960524,0.000031967993,0.00013075428,0.00007773147,0.0583704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0076968507,0.7600864,0.00092237076,0.020623775,0.04476168,0.00008213227,0.00029198657,0.00015615007,0.16537867],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955434,0.00008713719,0.000024253288,0.00007033016,0.00022120905,0.000042725194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988912,0.0004219766,0.00011807801,0.00003925503,0.00043754934,0.000091823145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067908235,0.0009854852,0.0009094658,0.0017894547,0.0013622299,0.0032257284,0.001041697,0.0020106684,0.018044576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022209117,0.00035577663,0.0005356756,0.002980191,0.0017227886,0.0053738905,0.0010804912,0.0027665473,0.010046795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005712498,0.0000056478734,0.00003439388,0.00055312074,0.0000066960038,0.000024742361,0.00016706009,0.000040580002,0.000110807436,0.0050318264,0.95195526,0.042064093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015084304,0.0000056528584,0.00027098047,0.0006067629,0.000006897683,0.00009047351,0.00020282943,0.000024446179,0.00007365729,0.0017067452,0.99700433,0.000005679954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040558535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076121385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018044576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020427532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00244583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06036508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558981804","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017867","title":"‘In a Settled Country, Everyone Must Eat’: Four Questions About Transnational Private Regulation, Migration, and Migrant Work","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mohawk; Work (physics); Political science; Colonialism; Media studies; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Library science","score_opus":0.01589076365390667,"score_gpt":0.2955271257389003,"score_spread":0.2796363620849936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558981804","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14581043,0.007327072,0.003056948,0.68561625,0.00044367652,0.000025877927,0.000040487594,0.000018390809,0.15766095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736546,0.0018091482,0.00036869384,0.014682597,0.00023223688,0.000028569122,0.000010380042,0.000012289126,0.009201415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955065,0.002856063,0.00009347351,0.00039646137,0.00036300605,0.0007843477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539644,0.0029194378,0.00045134957,0.0003148882,0.00040294058,0.00051487266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006232295,0.00022455162,0.000374416,0.0005487875,0.011649524,0.010072023,0.0019292333,0.007881153,0.0028365003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065716603,0.00023301918,0.00029953837,0.0012575286,0.057493072,0.009104912,0.005581992,0.005967107,0.00026615008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012191736,0.000014403139,0.0013358842,0.00004098169,0.0000027973067,0.00020876467,0.19852343,0.000058287736,0.00005159734,0.7854971,0.010217064,0.0040374734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025664061,0.000031557913,0.0074163685,0.0005698743,0.0000092184055,0.00037629463,0.54591143,0.00031787247,0.00016110482,0.30946732,0.13566604,0.000047337773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0863097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08804617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0863097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007975252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073243966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17161465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585534320","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001450","title":"'In the Public Interest': The Responsibilities and Rights of Government Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Professional responsibility; Legal ethics; Law; Private rights; Economic Justice; Professional ethics; Democracy; Public interest; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05216139345106101,"score_gpt":0.38516743859201297,"score_spread":0.33300604514095195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585534320","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13644795,0.0048877895,0.019246692,0.38052997,0.0006680619,0.00006177269,0.000034412216,0.00009787145,0.45802546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759556,0.00053330476,0.0011982439,0.00865221,0.00019572633,0.000037263515,0.0000080790605,0.000025231386,0.013394316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9677477,0.02139624,0.00061626395,0.0016166162,0.00411819,0.004505043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972627,0.017373296,0.0021646759,0.0028582716,0.0024045268,0.0025722913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022351362,0.00026191748,0.00043351576,0.0009222118,0.011207754,0.015056355,0.00154868,0.011191226,0.0048218444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04237764,0.00048065605,0.0003440864,0.0008408758,0.047450546,0.012006586,0.007938817,0.011290309,0.00094920985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013518019,0.000041131123,0.0009024794,0.000020241036,0.0000039574034,0.00014570683,0.046839777,0.00007999906,0.00020651016,0.93393004,0.0062899687,0.011526727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047063717,0.000051859188,0.0024705515,0.00028530252,0.000016704013,0.00051978073,0.047014963,0.0005734117,0.0005813562,0.79684025,0.15155607,0.0000426713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006732023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052682613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022351362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005500127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014475655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11820674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599196203","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200020964","title":"Sovereignty and Crimea: How Referendum Democracy Complicates Constituent Power in Multinational Societies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Secession; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Independence (probability theory); Democracy; Law; Territorial integrity; Political economy; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.049591547243615114,"score_gpt":0.3395510358353938,"score_spread":0.28995948859177867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599196203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5496705,0.0011843855,0.009605174,0.012758898,0.00008586602,0.000035126504,0.000028159204,0.00003580968,0.42659608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979961,0.000067141205,0.00021407178,0.000110543115,0.000008026608,0.000007182761,0.0000030846245,0.000007199927,0.0015867744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993512,0.0042338986,0.00013477821,0.0005551644,0.00056870957,0.0009954466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959901,0.0022142355,0.0003871877,0.00068143243,0.000400987,0.00032608482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007369623,0.00019168007,0.000519419,0.001594649,0.012976871,0.011933657,0.0011184157,0.0018870232,0.0049078716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009011512,0.00030330085,0.00036518124,0.001546974,0.059983164,0.0075735166,0.012771958,0.0032299948,0.00024681858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011981964,0.000008060275,0.0012904142,0.000012244603,0.0000057127354,0.00021072818,0.04047005,0.00021362168,0.00008597938,0.95420444,0.00040701358,0.003079723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000298158,0.00004984063,0.0063577597,0.00020903852,0.000026541009,0.00031197278,0.08276369,0.0016958237,0.00041915034,0.8353266,0.072766446,0.00004328763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018805355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020120183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018805355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059381723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00478361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04308468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26779528","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200006490","title":"Law, the State, and Evolutionary Theory: Introduction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Content (measure theory); State (computer science); Action (physics); Law and economics; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Sociology; Physics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.01765507773876737,"score_gpt":0.20585249817669668,"score_spread":0.1881974204379293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26779528","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010561029,0.5674323,0.05135576,0.09874357,0.0060672197,0.00008175294,0.00065791426,0.00015031033,0.2649501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36856288,0.4668358,0.023868982,0.02462926,0.024880243,0.0004169266,0.0007858614,0.00017178897,0.08984821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996865,0.00014535087,0.00001469719,0.000059988244,0.000061707055,0.00003177601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987985,0.0009129559,0.000051581348,0.000047973528,0.00013357574,0.000055363995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009991366,0.00064397336,0.0006642925,0.0016501365,0.000928193,0.002929877,0.000940364,0.0031381813,0.009007016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022742709,0.0004118169,0.0005604906,0.0025918558,0.0050152666,0.00475599,0.0013212105,0.0026998112,0.001262378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009550148,0.000030872507,0.0003455701,0.00026474294,0.0000124116905,0.00008599594,0.00039750757,0.0017028783,0.00009371692,0.94904685,0.026673311,0.021336665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006582811,0.000024105344,0.00075576635,0.00048176126,0.000008137374,0.0001169342,0.00025178422,0.0009830479,0.000041815547,0.848103,0.14921202,0.000015009072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002904312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022223103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009007016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026533448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085238024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03013146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780698079","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200022483","title":"Opening the Ranks of Constitutional Subjects: Immigration, Identity, and Innovation in Italy and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Subjectivity; Identity (music); Political science; National identity; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.025786940089979612,"score_gpt":0.3309389715755926,"score_spread":0.305152031485613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780698079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75935113,0.0022087947,0.00039439023,0.011235004,0.00006907702,0.000047440408,0.00012965695,0.000019508348,0.22654511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908516,0.00064260804,0.00021285308,0.00051032956,0.000010345725,0.000016941658,0.000045968744,0.00000890016,0.007700453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945909,0.0006499589,0.00006186057,0.0003111811,0.0010338719,0.003352281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737096,0.0007922084,0.00025586193,0.00010682505,0.0005008234,0.0009733812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002620931,0.0002974779,0.00047323704,0.002768924,0.02954471,0.011229234,0.0017258206,0.002029111,0.0038179092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063259476,0.00019483374,0.0004368546,0.005584595,0.023309883,0.002344736,0.00923255,0.0037011534,0.00013106779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015913422,0.00009509522,0.052964065,0.00013457006,0.000026968633,0.0028896378,0.42120782,0.0008277044,0.00063135324,0.47317535,0.0093109,0.038577404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046895922,0.00004346381,0.10798082,0.000537435,0.00008521544,0.0005924792,0.67477095,0.0012139876,0.0005916861,0.01668001,0.19730048,0.00015658757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99151796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99646723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1991611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1991611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17250335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9288596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920828632","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200020575","title":"The Strategic Constitution in Action: Canada's Afghan War as a Case Study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Empire; Political science; Enumerated powers; Foreign policy; Treaty; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Politics","score_opus":0.05969960859110246,"score_gpt":0.36989624540538607,"score_spread":0.3101966368142836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920828632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47651845,0.0075634224,0.0008322797,0.03390278,0.00035284137,0.00028623274,0.0007597281,0.000027808863,0.47975653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545325,0.0038939493,0.0006789226,0.003522486,0.00004133127,0.000107214764,0.00020696285,0.00001855786,0.036998145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591726,0.00075198105,0.000060480706,0.00016431315,0.0009413533,0.0021646407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792624,0.0007428645,0.00008462578,0.000055420933,0.0006001537,0.0005906937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018071849,0.0005201195,0.00047290605,0.0023727776,0.044055093,0.0080623,0.0020643629,0.0046380847,0.004280852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035345156,0.0002940163,0.00037459022,0.0089112865,0.010557769,0.0016295367,0.003762519,0.00423962,0.0003103678],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010274324,0.00023934103,0.020393036,0.00031231943,0.000044242868,0.011832426,0.18166228,0.00200948,0.00045952795,0.66021353,0.084917255,0.037813768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005042295,0.00004974429,0.020501528,0.0004845614,0.000048961494,0.0013536183,0.46932495,0.0011254734,0.00032954704,0.011940233,0.49470523,0.00008567251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99328893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99711907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15031464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15031464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1527249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9855146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921763831","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200021714","title":"Brexit. Or, Is the European Union Educable?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Brexit; Parliament; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04728492007501286,"score_gpt":0.3569850001148792,"score_spread":0.3097000800398664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921763831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016429886,0.032900576,0.0009335276,0.3865933,0.002564344,0.000009903728,0.000063581196,0.000037477326,0.5604674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6221552,0.011161654,0.0006205705,0.13818684,0.0013172951,0.000040367588,0.000106446765,0.00005324813,0.22635849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968438,0.0014918392,0.00006758193,0.0003194691,0.00047437527,0.0008029431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889225,0.00046676563,0.000119263954,0.000082209495,0.00021241076,0.00022704244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029353385,0.0002517742,0.00026143546,0.0006078277,0.0049839485,0.007891323,0.0005307333,0.0049120975,0.016195273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005103841,0.00008047829,0.0002269122,0.00084755523,0.008820855,0.005932045,0.0021389704,0.0040361527,0.0019022205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018962346,0.00003451543,0.0011051603,0.0000514722,0.0000059057556,0.00014034104,0.011480839,0.000057610298,0.00005638158,0.87707275,0.07186421,0.038111906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008090144,0.000022484799,0.0028441905,0.0006192683,0.0000063273637,0.000086652035,0.011880288,0.00004579962,0.00019620992,0.07752229,0.9067583,0.0000100090865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014646358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020183643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016195273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004171383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004202016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054178596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921825266","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200022859","title":"Taking More than They Give: MNE Tax Privateering and Apple's “Ocean” Income","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Base erosion and profit shifting; Subsidiary; Business; Multinational corporation; Tax haven; Tax avoidance; European union; Corporate tax; Double taxation; International trade; International economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.014603978906024058,"score_gpt":0.24764123374559305,"score_spread":0.233037254839569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921825266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2322009,0.0022986184,0.00089063094,0.09777031,0.00057171565,0.00004157452,0.000074737494,0.000031858024,0.6661196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8787439,0.0009333046,0.00034474017,0.018496223,0.00014414027,0.000022637887,0.00003805717,0.000024138963,0.101252936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976382,0.00055488036,0.000050149083,0.0002870515,0.0006537266,0.0008159722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985488,0.0005812386,0.00018498415,0.00009970736,0.0002736951,0.00031153753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019063605,0.00019080788,0.00022344042,0.00064951525,0.008519999,0.0101483725,0.00063484843,0.0041564433,0.008353732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00424343,0.00020385375,0.00040071688,0.0006645274,0.0065139025,0.0047631073,0.0044630063,0.0076589207,0.0005232827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006373639,0.00007282597,0.008144339,0.000035805897,0.000015163802,0.00094523793,0.014988692,0.00022224958,0.00022092249,0.9116219,0.048646845,0.015022234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006460388,0.00008671725,0.02763402,0.00043988996,0.00008699092,0.0005269872,0.042493645,0.0013083922,0.001398392,0.14140502,0.78440756,0.00014783618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06218359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14491262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06218359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009223713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005184464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12364328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921835525","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200021763","title":"Safety Valves and Complete Exits in European Treaty Politics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; European union; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; International trade; Member states; Safeguard; Law; Political economy; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.03256380832389923,"score_gpt":0.30839861692638654,"score_spread":0.2758348086024873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921835525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07783975,0.0074346894,0.03931492,0.038136605,0.0010660689,0.00007992003,0.00011199482,0.00014474092,0.8358712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9374111,0.0014711521,0.003035114,0.009782803,0.0008024875,0.00018056287,0.000115426075,0.00017594619,0.047025394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97341806,0.014017692,0.001273468,0.003566455,0.0040315394,0.0036928302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874916,0.007791419,0.0009920548,0.0020114426,0.0010558913,0.00065762136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025498256,0.00059017946,0.0011501806,0.002057386,0.009755423,0.021243952,0.0015658075,0.012000258,0.008365666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04271503,0.00066200434,0.0015611767,0.0021863023,0.039482277,0.019497508,0.010912369,0.013300006,0.0010248447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059938943,0.0000035176524,0.00004184774,0.000005516476,0.0000017417462,0.000012400856,0.0008130462,0.00008869328,0.000012586138,0.9969222,0.0008583959,0.0012341153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025423755,0.000018187082,0.00027542628,0.0001565823,0.000005829818,0.000027612257,0.0010659457,0.00030286665,0.00007125965,0.9503994,0.0476341,0.000017350661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038941659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021459227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025498256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007083864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006046447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13484925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921843199","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200019799","title":"Migration of European Judicial Ideas Concerning Jurisdiction Over Google on Withdrawal of Information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to be forgotten; Jurisdiction; Legitimacy; Political science; Order (exchange); Position (finance); Economic Justice; Phenomenon; European court of justice; European union; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; European Union law; Data Protection Act 1998; International trade","score_opus":0.012152119813946375,"score_gpt":0.2840514299627629,"score_spread":0.2718993101488165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921843199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15837963,0.012456723,0.014238372,0.10828393,0.000875192,0.00008018918,0.00017171146,0.00011430152,0.7053999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672651,0.0014154632,0.0012619948,0.017228972,0.00026150374,0.000037382397,0.00004017459,0.000040921746,0.012448483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97801226,0.009208463,0.0011743226,0.003249696,0.0052912147,0.0030640918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849941,0.010071156,0.00084100163,0.0013573802,0.0022064121,0.0005299264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023949636,0.00044906323,0.00073106814,0.002293938,0.009942256,0.017152086,0.002276933,0.01705119,0.0020485558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030554172,0.0004978466,0.0010290713,0.0022114937,0.038746122,0.010809318,0.007618538,0.013450093,0.0003105744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011560654,0.0000047630333,0.00023694817,0.000015628975,0.0000047766616,0.00014881954,0.005159499,0.000058832247,0.000118444885,0.9896282,0.002215797,0.0023968192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089973655,0.00006950119,0.003788748,0.00096060545,0.00009365403,0.0007076936,0.01815156,0.0013479374,0.0019181618,0.5666414,0.40600905,0.0002216699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03987874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027019605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03987874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014371877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009605091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12665933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921907415","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017636","title":"Welfare Rights in Canadian and German Constitutional Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Individualism; Law; Political science; Politics; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Welfare rights; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Constitution","score_opus":0.04791757453907466,"score_gpt":0.32162531292933916,"score_spread":0.2737077383902645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921907415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047504008,0.011826123,0.0025718615,0.049006388,0.0006407348,0.000073795294,0.0009082432,0.00008220401,0.8873867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88397837,0.0064602834,0.0028556932,0.009719116,0.00026372852,0.00011403692,0.00047666606,0.000081515216,0.09605057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99145484,0.0010668305,0.00016864954,0.0008215443,0.0028899421,0.0035981364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961145,0.0010473381,0.00016062484,0.00023619198,0.0015605122,0.0008807339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044764625,0.000538988,0.00063648325,0.0060350555,0.019585287,0.015151946,0.0018640591,0.0040407116,0.008917008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011227281,0.00048676392,0.00064442493,0.0071948403,0.024606494,0.0043804646,0.0038077522,0.0051264833,0.000483345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068980553,0.000004765351,0.00022356937,0.000010513455,0.0000024502315,0.000025442598,0.001550734,0.00014901895,0.00003067965,0.989852,0.0052649383,0.0028789085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056791105,0.000014110146,0.016067158,0.00034940054,0.000047144113,0.00009510412,0.0059769433,0.00105079,0.0002377008,0.4078164,0.5681463,0.00014221865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98472714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18443964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18443964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14233224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9459344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921982759","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200023105","title":"Legal Harmonization Through Interfederal Cooperation: A Comparison of the Interfederal Harmonization of Law Through Uniform Law Conferences and Executive Intergovernmental Conferences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harmonization; Federalism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Transparency (behavior); Federal law; Public administration; Business; Legislation; Politics","score_opus":0.04158019726274978,"score_gpt":0.33664090307701766,"score_spread":0.2950607058142679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921982759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70503926,0.0005772321,0.020304896,0.0016502787,0.000046654666,0.00062070787,0.00006997093,0.000093543,0.27159742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970317,0.00009368451,0.0013759225,0.000070490605,0.000011159383,0.00010051475,0.000022566706,0.000007453628,0.0012865305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96090937,0.027187288,0.0010753255,0.0012500419,0.0057943747,0.0037836698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93588054,0.039159324,0.0076053245,0.0070554414,0.0077248765,0.00257442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025184607,0.0001916775,0.0004474304,0.004727007,0.0032261438,0.007684356,0.0017101152,0.0015091146,0.0057804137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06674644,0.000295037,0.00046513372,0.0038150502,0.0075418213,0.0075742295,0.0064975065,0.0018031526,0.00028067085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028883253,0.000606139,0.035863437,0.00031974138,0.00008836197,0.00033463532,0.0244954,0.009855013,0.0012783619,0.85144323,0.00161546,0.073811345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005338962,0.0020550317,0.446817,0.0012240461,0.00031335923,0.0007719991,0.19218886,0.04430359,0.0066131623,0.1886672,0.11624398,0.0002677746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007123094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007915372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025184607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058689374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007827179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13319051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922373660","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017909","title":"Home State Regulation of Environmental Human Rights Harms As Transnational Private Regulatory Governance*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Transnational governance; Human rights; State (computer science); Political science; Regulatory state; International law; International human rights law; Law and economics; Business; Public administration; Law; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.010051309370955146,"score_gpt":0.20964558488057974,"score_spread":0.1995942755096246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922373660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13411786,0.0012367473,0.05535311,0.021012008,0.00014914726,0.00024265573,0.000095220305,0.00016820876,0.787625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97234863,0.00034833656,0.003697236,0.0021600914,0.000031988413,0.000075159194,0.000018767501,0.00002691712,0.02129282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909107,0.002497382,0.00024623043,0.001167393,0.0030252323,0.0021531428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940129,0.0022019912,0.000621457,0.001416916,0.0013876484,0.00035902645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073276954,0.0003105276,0.00042842628,0.0012575878,0.007065575,0.00960141,0.0015738514,0.005168202,0.0044959164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067891283,0.00039561043,0.00077119184,0.0012736693,0.039247278,0.0053761085,0.0068373024,0.005164386,0.00020210767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033246179,0.0000073265333,0.00046888404,0.000010454956,0.000005174325,0.00008214548,0.0031427809,0.0004605633,0.0001920612,0.9918291,0.00076240115,0.0030356622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044896715,0.000052034437,0.007653489,0.00028816704,0.00007639986,0.00037979623,0.012273267,0.005523689,0.0016168802,0.7924989,0.17948116,0.00011134925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38158676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46155798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38158676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02160821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027067678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75873137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922521801","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001802","title":"The Delicate Equilibrium of EU Trade Measures: The Seals Case","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Indigenous; Seal (emblem); Parliament; Arctic; The arctic; International trade; Consumption (sociology); Business; Economy; Political science; Geography; Environmental protection; Economics; Law; Archaeology; Ecology; Sociology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.04162140591475037,"score_gpt":0.3362956676268271,"score_spread":0.2946742617120767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922521801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2154534,0.002203977,0.011221694,0.021339536,0.00016589048,0.000100460515,0.00021459043,0.00006505752,0.74923545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781979,0.0005410135,0.0011662401,0.0035204776,0.0001262323,0.00010534157,0.0000476951,0.00003095802,0.01626427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99129194,0.0028123977,0.00038195637,0.0013846472,0.00131793,0.0028111576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955772,0.002408823,0.00054064894,0.00057783915,0.0004313824,0.00046414215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008792509,0.00058715814,0.001379967,0.0014927677,0.0065935,0.013798889,0.0017746177,0.014048051,0.011733542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015761139,0.00065471,0.0016795357,0.0013034926,0.009270251,0.007826849,0.007462377,0.007573118,0.0009531148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003320882,0.000024601108,0.00050984725,0.000012633362,0.000017483037,0.00022472667,0.00031537592,0.000661061,0.00006108387,0.99509263,0.0010624578,0.0019850016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015405186,0.00008150824,0.0018428707,0.00017038023,0.000046767957,0.00019759043,0.0016039519,0.0028240806,0.0003307323,0.9545088,0.038187556,0.00005174727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012651558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008541047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014048051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005273269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035184163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04649979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941308389","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.9","title":"Populist leaders and political parties","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Politics; Elite; Political science; Democracy; State (computer science); Political economy; Virtue; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.038653414460385796,"score_gpt":0.37087236651537697,"score_spread":0.3322189520549912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941308389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4465013,0.0026751873,0.0067011495,0.027668756,0.00033950494,0.000052879073,0.000050617913,0.000028955314,0.5159816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957021,0.0002230695,0.00015056474,0.0002759939,0.000092579605,0.000008950163,0.000004781694,0.0000035376693,0.0035384034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961845,0.0022468648,0.00009185792,0.00024313162,0.0006175212,0.0006160644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98952127,0.0063812714,0.0019865085,0.00035139764,0.0006925454,0.0010670263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002892659,0.00013306718,0.00025775464,0.0012478282,0.004051274,0.005534766,0.00049990637,0.0012678534,0.0082068015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011016339,0.00010873794,0.00015802613,0.001218719,0.010642933,0.0020194943,0.004995693,0.0022188479,0.00045011024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002807382,0.000027649121,0.0055221724,0.000035529847,0.000007790289,0.00022012637,0.009290723,0.00018409867,0.00010475589,0.9775114,0.0014196882,0.0056480425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007226966,0.00011320731,0.020374684,0.00029236823,0.00002413934,0.0003698014,0.025018793,0.0017355226,0.0006765063,0.82531095,0.12597333,0.000038425966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009825184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011725929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0082068015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002115797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001567358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027454555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982294728","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.74","title":"A Tale of Two (Diverse) Countries: Religious Diversity in Canada and Singapore","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Secularism; Freedom of religion; Constitution; Diversity (politics); Political science; Religious freedom; Religious diversity; Charter; Sociology; Liberalism; Ethnic group; Cultural diversity; Minority rights; Law; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Human rights; Ethnology; Economic freedom; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012225705339405405,"score_gpt":0.26701008077356947,"score_spread":0.25478437543416405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982294728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9135483,0.0022572733,0.00022155598,0.022375295,0.00013255424,0.000031029133,0.00034423143,0.000010007269,0.061079774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930708,0.00062728446,0.00011068249,0.0011007307,0.0000061742326,0.0000055769965,0.000056785306,0.000005465598,0.005016544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831223,0.00033166303,0.00003066161,0.00011352279,0.00032906164,0.00088284793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976496,0.00030444888,0.00017040226,0.00005795467,0.0006671073,0.0011504935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010973624,0.0002402055,0.0003815226,0.001935284,0.026796289,0.0058607496,0.0010169452,0.0012545629,0.0043711867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021609068,0.00015371006,0.00025329593,0.0046274597,0.008220237,0.0014460048,0.005240621,0.0024525297,0.00014538171],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017677496,0.00014001426,0.14866926,0.00022120593,0.00007741743,0.0071860068,0.57710475,0.0008566528,0.0012389059,0.15967345,0.04118429,0.06347126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010708285,0.000026555355,0.07555442,0.0002431866,0.000028575914,0.00031128852,0.8245243,0.00030347132,0.00026808705,0.0029260663,0.09571781,0.000085558386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99147683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073151484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073151484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06930321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5307536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982351217","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.77","title":"Solidarity in Diversity? State Responses to Religious Diversity in Liberal and Non-Liberal Perspectives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; National University of Singapore","keywords":"Solidarity; Diversity (politics); Political science; Secularism; State (computer science); Sociology; Liberal democracy; Liberalism; Environmental ethics; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.01665888651955795,"score_gpt":0.29817363911422906,"score_spread":0.2815147525946711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982351217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25827423,0.004106385,0.0043726256,0.15639484,0.0013010345,0.00004094747,0.0000631979,0.00002093334,0.57542574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98943824,0.0005279026,0.00013301944,0.0042403787,0.00014101723,0.000009936085,0.000008363569,0.00000658132,0.0054944777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952148,0.0029585995,0.00010029781,0.00021970367,0.0007303748,0.00077626086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967353,0.0019102304,0.00032241503,0.00021516813,0.00031043394,0.00050648325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004244263,0.00012164799,0.00022751187,0.00069495523,0.00482286,0.0066204555,0.0005392054,0.0026332715,0.0053877328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047884495,0.000096344564,0.00020124062,0.0008536092,0.01676662,0.0039722077,0.0061603123,0.0039001098,0.00023055355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017614497,0.000025158317,0.0009914011,0.000032818203,0.0000047362723,0.000100712474,0.040053267,0.0000823775,0.0001886962,0.94676524,0.0045674113,0.0071706125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031028394,0.00008172711,0.015499225,0.00050313695,0.000019710287,0.00015162646,0.19449666,0.0006791653,0.00065744796,0.49120498,0.29661918,0.000056166948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069432002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01753696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069432002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006376905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025881552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046267927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005751002","doi":"10.1017/glj.2020.10","title":"Does Investor-State Dispute Settlement Discriminate Against Nationals?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Ratification; Constitutional court; Political science; European union; Law; Investor-state dispute settlement; German; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Law and economics; Business; Economics; Constitution; Foreign direct investment; International trade; Politics; International investment; History","score_opus":0.020170245623566257,"score_gpt":0.24145434400666116,"score_spread":0.2212840983830949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005751002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24072137,0.0019219578,0.009350243,0.039542962,0.0005137075,0.00004943036,0.0000882654,0.00003481504,0.7077772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98746675,0.00028156498,0.00039748478,0.0029022149,0.00012753418,0.000015297996,0.000020513817,0.0000054678553,0.008783175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99287206,0.0021938086,0.00046007536,0.0012201829,0.0015624127,0.001691428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99183756,0.004865469,0.00097652414,0.00092588284,0.0010029161,0.00039170243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010091273,0.00014342567,0.00069063494,0.00086105324,0.003909643,0.008251138,0.0011822585,0.004146856,0.008503195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018645234,0.00014447185,0.00052739645,0.0009711254,0.010131239,0.0047552,0.0041155852,0.0037934734,0.00060012186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028454317,0.000031069474,0.0025798385,0.000030149658,0.0000073109845,0.00014425043,0.0017804748,0.00010087576,0.00021975981,0.98542005,0.002126565,0.007531276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010918999,0.00016691154,0.011949804,0.0007947655,0.000117454525,0.00072341145,0.012412612,0.0035159457,0.0040319087,0.7869779,0.1791154,0.00008475171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004997905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052339486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010091273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032975057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030834135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05336839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082112013","doi":"10.1017/glj.2020.50","title":"The Conceptualization of Constitutional Supremacy: Global Discourse and Legal Tradition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Law; Constitution; Political science; Doctrine; White supremacy; Supremacy Clause; Constitutional law; Sociology; Statute; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.03277042819051123,"score_gpt":0.3293126719201979,"score_spread":0.2965422437296867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082112013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29182017,0.01844704,0.02971338,0.03250815,0.00035730176,0.000037598267,0.00007272187,0.00010049793,0.6269431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972555,0.00062563334,0.00058959,0.00023446736,0.000048226324,0.000007783148,0.0000094998495,0.0000115062585,0.001217815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99494815,0.0034806589,0.00014603061,0.0006093557,0.000494594,0.0003212497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99258834,0.0054456247,0.00053829845,0.00079098565,0.0003850907,0.000251776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005759561,0.00034486683,0.0005846792,0.0037914126,0.0038914203,0.008590467,0.0011650765,0.0025015874,0.003716719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067339903,0.00022994324,0.00026923852,0.0035044774,0.07557997,0.008948902,0.0049697263,0.004701928,0.00018062792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033029523,0.000002465361,0.00014423353,0.000019601033,0.000002476594,0.000033989567,0.01641144,0.0001106685,0.00006836137,0.981644,0.00011693518,0.0014426429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025721252,0.000037129066,0.0018315901,0.00043819114,0.000025792537,0.00018056916,0.026071342,0.0008710521,0.0003375014,0.9093706,0.060789034,0.000021450838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006550458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050385776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00872688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00872688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025650484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06331825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121944165","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001504","title":"The Five Lessons I Learned Through Clinical Education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Indictment; Casebook; Churning; Legal education; Curriculum; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.15597166387903746,"score_gpt":0.5538591762690033,"score_spread":0.3978875123899658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121944165","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061014844,0.024023538,0.013452806,0.75656855,0.011600588,0.0001632985,0.00008741413,0.00026335983,0.18773906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31505525,0.048989993,0.044125404,0.43329284,0.011430489,0.0009907458,0.00019040924,0.00038673676,0.14553817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905346,0.005526412,0.0002704214,0.0008560976,0.0015744034,0.0012380553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873648,0.0043269866,0.00045278174,0.0010720086,0.0020391536,0.0047441274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109138,0.00071390765,0.00050630694,0.0016155073,0.008020215,0.013705962,0.0023313398,0.007518572,0.010942219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02212272,0.0005044809,0.0006352657,0.0009901875,0.025993304,0.013118147,0.011929986,0.021386854,0.004108938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060540024,0.0004647948,0.0021508455,0.0005794243,0.00001726783,0.0008726468,0.035149436,0.0002914369,0.000338248,0.38386288,0.32185373,0.25435883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004949141,0.00017686191,0.00084001594,0.0018990418,0.000007098339,0.0010471854,0.023972841,0.00018557165,0.00033071567,0.2115437,0.7598929,0.00005453409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008059654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011995788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013705962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067218016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018361755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057718396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122466507","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001425","title":"The Association of Transnational Law Schools' Agora: An Experiment in Graduate Legal Pedagogy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Agora; Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Legal education; Political science; Law; Legal realism; Legal profession; Scholarship; Comparative law; Sociology","score_opus":0.049977915924158775,"score_gpt":0.407106661106963,"score_spread":0.3571287451828042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122466507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831702,0.000026454672,0.00055821857,0.0014151027,0.000077157456,0.0002987346,0.000037378115,0.00003617591,0.014380544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864476,0.000058958933,0.001730287,0.0014735482,0.000050509854,0.0009043819,0.000058761565,0.000027387796,0.009248501],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857767,0.009605546,0.00031221227,0.0017812628,0.0012144464,0.0013097259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98162365,0.007241241,0.0011576432,0.0030922992,0.0010955695,0.0057896846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016206142,0.000340386,0.00085045304,0.0008910631,0.009644371,0.004532959,0.0018013658,0.0031961952,0.01145245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017087223,0.0008871188,0.00052731956,0.0011955189,0.0073314006,0.0046096467,0.011762728,0.0055539026,0.0015685264],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009482052,0.15764229,0.06258673,0.00051889394,0.0001386618,0.0011882801,0.5023829,0.0011843313,0.019414954,0.09947278,0.016552389,0.12943587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01209401,0.06925987,0.18332939,0.00033743022,0.00019499121,0.00066070794,0.47724771,0.008209941,0.0064176973,0.0499889,0.19182819,0.00043110468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003532845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008246156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016206142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021784606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057204636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08570731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122651965","doi":"10.1017/glj.2020.31","title":"A Topographical Approach to Accountability for Human Rights Violations in Migration Control","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Human rights; Law and economics; Control (management); Political science; Business; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03095379386496562,"score_gpt":0.3434790713382644,"score_spread":0.3125252774732988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122651965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13281226,0.0015128072,0.3184588,0.050434988,0.0004914892,0.0001960956,0.00028303877,0.00042273078,0.49538776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893365,0.00020089553,0.0073703127,0.00028339785,0.00004677092,0.000037614125,0.000023852055,0.000024435672,0.0026762364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930548,0.004257583,0.00024403374,0.0005610959,0.0011969669,0.0006855292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893138,0.004351359,0.00196256,0.0017829472,0.0022071458,0.000382224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005478324,0.0003812732,0.0003073877,0.0037502083,0.0050835568,0.0100926105,0.0016539965,0.002269689,0.0068298783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019970836,0.00028576877,0.0004708655,0.0029755912,0.03268596,0.009935987,0.0063414783,0.0023648131,0.0004634247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064454907,0.0000064153246,0.0020405855,0.000025482761,0.000004498155,0.000102176404,0.0046034316,0.0017447354,0.000103951075,0.9821414,0.0011008384,0.008120037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013950328,0.00003369121,0.007600227,0.00020829476,0.000022130347,0.00035673642,0.016598996,0.007678988,0.00041887202,0.9208923,0.046125643,0.000050072616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015550113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015798723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015550113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071207606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005469806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05166495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123100070","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001401","title":"<i>Born to be Wild:</i> The “Trans-systemic” Programme at McGill and the De-Nationalization of Legal Education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Jurisdiction; Vocational education; Legal practice; Political science; Legal profession; Law; Legal research; Legal realism; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02797268398985395,"score_gpt":0.3369369060915065,"score_spread":0.30896422210165253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123100070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059673632,0.014679265,0.0012484225,0.8904398,0.0039032353,0.00002025551,0.00012058545,0.00008314213,0.08353802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2253693,0.006384313,0.002435535,0.44819942,0.0022623618,0.00008739071,0.0001329518,0.00020175462,0.3149269],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747545,0.00079207646,0.000053530086,0.00037883635,0.0006797239,0.00062044995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970651,0.00095910026,0.00033518247,0.00014145712,0.0006130791,0.0008860957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025681197,0.00038488384,0.00023907861,0.00063713355,0.008340296,0.00899679,0.0016029975,0.006078844,0.020423068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048986254,0.00026291376,0.00020939378,0.0009827375,0.014957656,0.0074172574,0.0042980164,0.0067138826,0.0021940856],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031245792,0.000013747357,0.0012111694,0.00010102515,0.0000049491,0.0001548043,0.009699373,0.000038736227,0.00038942246,0.2971452,0.67497045,0.016239854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056543836,0.000011477203,0.0023716064,0.00017172309,0.0000038116896,0.00013012154,0.0056858854,0.00007193131,0.00035449013,0.016084801,0.97507495,0.000033558626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27852097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.521142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014548296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016167717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5537996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124307502","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200006167","title":"The ECJ, Volkswagen and European Corporate Law: Reshaping the European Varieties of Capitalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Member state; Political science; Law; Treaty; European court of justice; Commission; Economic Justice; Statute; State (computer science); European union; European Union law; Business; Member states; International trade","score_opus":0.022215517513478528,"score_gpt":0.2124983963075694,"score_spread":0.19028287879409087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124307502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05464271,0.050281476,0.007348741,0.095765635,0.002669583,0.00003214333,0.00008345404,0.0000838486,0.7890924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88863635,0.0063799564,0.002725199,0.038918793,0.0012879675,0.00006274293,0.000065651526,0.00008958143,0.061833855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99347717,0.0023929693,0.00032041827,0.0012083944,0.0015624244,0.0010385542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975846,0.0011634665,0.00026179955,0.00049298344,0.00021829826,0.00027886816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075129773,0.0004996517,0.00046890698,0.0016184403,0.0037753005,0.018205376,0.0013237472,0.011824782,0.0025990533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00977453,0.0003585971,0.00047708012,0.0020783779,0.025380226,0.009910628,0.0062702647,0.007401305,0.0003723868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006069422,0.0000055118917,0.00007037884,0.000008824154,0.0000018244629,0.00004212765,0.00072440744,0.00008613659,0.00004396067,0.98926055,0.0059621246,0.0037880768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003068497,0.000027718652,0.0018855004,0.00039414188,0.000012259289,0.00017082546,0.0016187519,0.0004820587,0.00033819152,0.59801257,0.39699104,0.000036195754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0125910295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013856668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018205376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006814747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00482218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049444675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125481302","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001383","title":"“Transnational Law” as Proto-Concept: Three Conceptions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Political science; Law; Public law; Comparative law; Municipal law; International law; Term (time); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02048432206843382,"score_gpt":0.34116796321686693,"score_spread":0.3206836411484331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125481302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06577934,0.015962752,0.113400355,0.0301352,0.0011052554,0.0002955998,0.00038333816,0.0002662034,0.77267194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9316607,0.004364773,0.03498598,0.003997947,0.0005563812,0.0010318037,0.0002996292,0.00014396918,0.022958778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720025,0.0012794385,0.00014088642,0.0003983687,0.00067804294,0.0003030147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832946,0.0006942138,0.00019090525,0.00027827086,0.0002396933,0.0002674635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003937741,0.00068628293,0.0005792337,0.0026630128,0.0031527397,0.010339841,0.0017308153,0.0034187296,0.0037797973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033187887,0.00039210514,0.0006905293,0.0031881942,0.031477552,0.01162067,0.0064854636,0.005141808,0.0006772856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024917883,0.0000033741492,0.000050422448,0.0000117059135,9.154267e-7,0.000015472951,0.0018470248,0.000015534148,0.000036901427,0.99658585,0.00044008822,0.0009902816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010008995,0.000023251134,0.00043175629,0.00012396839,0.0000063248744,0.0002895924,0.0046213646,0.0005078835,0.0002133523,0.9265133,0.06723977,0.000019311123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021972833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013834323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010339841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004317493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022589304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031325758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125688624","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001140","title":"Law's Knowledge and Law's Effectiveness: Reflections from Legal Sociology and Legal Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Nagging; Institutionalisation; Bureaucracy; Rationalization (economics); Law; Sociology; Parallels; Political science; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025207395803524567,"score_gpt":0.35074309936203935,"score_spread":0.3255357035585148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125688624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051264327,0.023076488,0.004143797,0.4475282,0.0006464879,0.000044022257,0.00003851429,0.000034378536,0.47322372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694801,0.006713592,0.0006386055,0.01133718,0.000668264,0.000048522717,0.000014311862,0.000056118344,0.011043368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678752,0.02365619,0.000525575,0.001307434,0.0035469043,0.003088774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8952317,0.095777,0.0020592094,0.0015116235,0.003220552,0.002199891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039783247,0.0005674717,0.0010731719,0.006495195,0.014054586,0.028612828,0.0034503527,0.010326154,0.0058478094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051197074,0.0005222333,0.0006487599,0.0040949928,0.16139299,0.02605569,0.010341413,0.010408294,0.0006563779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009146416,0.000036296005,0.00020062317,0.000061250415,0.000005189214,0.00009088235,0.05382106,0.00013137465,0.000023879147,0.93926775,0.003069401,0.0032831107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048325208,0.00004322435,0.0012500494,0.00065072917,0.000017083526,0.00012107457,0.1371175,0.00055072433,0.00026467978,0.718103,0.14180495,0.000028591849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023776315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021581758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039783247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030631693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015090108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22224951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126007499","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200000870","title":"The Case of<i>Laval</i>in the Context of the Post-Enlargement EC Law Development","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resizing; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Directive; Political science; Law; Field (mathematics); European union; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; International trade; Computer science; Geology","score_opus":0.01921711681127998,"score_gpt":0.28800356506788155,"score_spread":0.2687864482566016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126007499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31396207,0.0069241966,0.0028805388,0.09239861,0.00071056886,0.00003616509,0.000060390255,0.000056381992,0.5829711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687095,0.00025279057,0.0003260385,0.007564712,0.0001013937,0.00001557269,0.000008637907,0.000014857013,0.023006398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99232554,0.0024862953,0.00017513303,0.0009303459,0.0012829177,0.002799807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976852,0.0013117574,0.00024392184,0.0002253504,0.0002633146,0.00027046484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047161463,0.00021995863,0.00030214412,0.0006346754,0.01287562,0.011670917,0.0014433758,0.009256343,0.0037142588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006931571,0.0002893779,0.0005659013,0.00068678154,0.022029841,0.0032568444,0.008376804,0.00833872,0.00038961574],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043191834,0.000016917553,0.00089559006,0.000030458943,0.000006546408,0.0007490939,0.017224493,0.00015201858,0.00024710424,0.97098833,0.0048939288,0.0047523305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000522614,0.000112799375,0.0086798165,0.00040727988,0.000037102836,0.0009872189,0.03550677,0.0008167405,0.0015913697,0.16460983,0.78707033,0.00012846626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065922275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07438785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065922275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011074338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069431416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13107711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199691955","doi":"10.1017/glj.2021.59","title":"The Protection of Human Rights in Pandemics—Reflections on the Past, Present, and Future","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Uniwersytet Warszawski; Queen's University; European University Institute; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Politics; Public health; International human rights law; Right to health; Fundamental rights; State (computer science); Pandemic; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Disease; Medicine","score_opus":0.0467327509093018,"score_gpt":0.34538677155647834,"score_spread":0.29865402064717655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199691955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022374192,0.07890755,0.0030420194,0.6841308,0.005885605,0.000023748684,0.000056918532,0.000030102765,0.20554909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8698616,0.0368035,0.0010030331,0.06080902,0.007847325,0.00004565132,0.000043470824,0.00005223867,0.023534108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961403,0.002518626,0.00008173249,0.00019538158,0.0004936575,0.00057032116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99253803,0.0062403013,0.0002717393,0.00026568887,0.0003563273,0.00032782357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079847835,0.00029395855,0.00040427851,0.0011327292,0.0046433182,0.010045846,0.0010539311,0.0078107216,0.004842495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006621299,0.00020567181,0.00033268987,0.0010843911,0.030302554,0.010400998,0.005204606,0.008515022,0.0003962268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000809407,0.000014412599,0.00012234223,0.00005970815,0.0000024588014,0.00011805101,0.011348265,0.00016702405,0.000074690084,0.961243,0.020796215,0.006045794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010617433,0.000025761432,0.000718118,0.0007931989,0.0000040226164,0.00016484321,0.03706575,0.00040588703,0.00022281717,0.49265012,0.46791267,0.000026114412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005132706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005640764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010045846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072682807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037623276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05273533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36033888","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200005459","title":"The Introduction of Real Estate Investment Trusts [REITs] in Germany","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Real estate and construction management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Real estate investment trust; Parliament; German; Legislator; German government; Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Business; Real estate; Political science; Accounting; Finance; Law; Politics; Legislation","score_opus":0.005004905703729685,"score_gpt":0.22832137675504954,"score_spread":0.22331647105131985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36033888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25779253,0.0064490056,0.008204039,0.027370632,0.0029462439,0.0007501834,0.0015027877,0.0012214753,0.6937631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70440567,0.0022141337,0.0025863994,0.009623859,0.0005343762,0.00021711976,0.00063313486,0.00017990112,0.27960533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99404764,0.0008695007,0.0005330212,0.0008883449,0.0019336431,0.0017278518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974165,0.0006541462,0.00052618294,0.00031808598,0.0006280864,0.00045706765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036609783,0.00053380505,0.0003466653,0.0011575966,0.0020114626,0.0076023787,0.0010983401,0.0066696233,0.008070171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075514675,0.0010060694,0.0006097787,0.0014485485,0.0023012431,0.0038474568,0.0030965805,0.003877936,0.0022181694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015121659,0.00012375294,0.0033106396,0.00020179362,0.000027147085,0.0019626382,0.0023745329,0.0016749067,0.0022566097,0.8321179,0.11917205,0.036626812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007152327,0.00015419265,0.01592802,0.00017647498,0.000033660384,0.0006079942,0.0009533722,0.0013216421,0.0024204745,0.007838457,0.9703197,0.0001744461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06264928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067045145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06264928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011607096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006489081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12456924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210963208","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001462","title":"Sustainable Professionalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Practice of law; Legal profession; Skepticism; Legal education; Professional responsibility; Politics; Political science; Accountability; Law; Legal practice; Suspect; Work (physics); Public interest; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.043088990300738116,"score_gpt":0.43891631556246835,"score_spread":0.39582732526173026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210963208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034724202,0.0038812533,0.009325279,0.10557781,0.0023013104,0.00007557265,0.00008505391,0.00017258117,0.8751088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24072972,0.0058616996,0.011700021,0.056930214,0.0024888378,0.00026742733,0.00023650937,0.00042155315,0.6813641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99019027,0.0030759964,0.00025855997,0.0018161763,0.0028820848,0.0017770138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99197024,0.0012829324,0.00042728617,0.0016765713,0.0016090971,0.003033961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007935989,0.00070045807,0.0005647872,0.0014550755,0.009118103,0.011089691,0.0018117677,0.0066339476,0.051562764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010482452,0.00043679634,0.00075825735,0.00089282397,0.021208655,0.009397472,0.015252252,0.009050289,0.022357302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010800122,0.000053071723,0.00026239493,0.00006681719,0.0000047403555,0.000062423715,0.0035680246,0.00010441969,0.00022146058,0.8519661,0.115007095,0.028672542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005059603,0.000016913697,0.00017238928,0.0001581384,0.0000014032616,0.00007041221,0.0011906528,0.00010938048,0.00009992572,0.15834117,0.83982843,0.000006048966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003215211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047223475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051562764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009563987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015100962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17249459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297394486","doi":"10.1017/glj.2022.66","title":"Legal Scholars Engaging with Social Anthropology: Hardships and Gains","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Toolbox; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Variety (cybernetics); German; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.055706670600195594,"score_gpt":0.3830768190405119,"score_spread":0.3273701484403163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297394486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01845676,0.06916476,0.0059219413,0.8037965,0.014220082,0.000049674745,0.000033621076,0.000080492246,0.08827615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75528896,0.06958734,0.008336694,0.098008364,0.030055894,0.0002970457,0.00007646468,0.00036614647,0.037983127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96392286,0.029568324,0.00062350684,0.0012936889,0.0027966194,0.0017950156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8995656,0.08507137,0.0015077728,0.004930928,0.0032411017,0.0056833173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043749034,0.00091991085,0.0011431751,0.005128583,0.018528406,0.03326079,0.0019019608,0.010480271,0.008393302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04208917,0.0006767494,0.0005854102,0.003954376,0.068891704,0.031814616,0.02441013,0.010904179,0.0013298157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002440143,0.000108660286,0.00071965455,0.0002662905,0.000021504718,0.00042791126,0.11875927,0.00015312192,0.00016421365,0.7503989,0.08052473,0.04843124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018604202,0.00003104963,0.0006224168,0.0010480436,0.000008382324,0.0003167905,0.10901442,0.00026962857,0.00012300926,0.38955575,0.4989648,0.000027116987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020085433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047529954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043749034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008296033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008502881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2313698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382133561","doi":"10.1017/glj.2023.42","title":"Kahn in Luxembourg: A Prolegomena to the Cultural Study of EU Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam","keywords":"Political science; Law; European union; Skepticism; Politics; Comparative law; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Common law; Identity (music); Sociology; Geography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04444019664918444,"score_gpt":0.370220337445611,"score_spread":0.3257801407964266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382133561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64841586,0.03168328,0.004756428,0.056742635,0.00059894123,0.000055472832,0.00005337976,0.000029454684,0.25766447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99414366,0.0022689027,0.00031229755,0.0009403784,0.00007654676,0.000012933761,0.0000059715826,0.000008138773,0.002231044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659294,0.002785644,0.00003034521,0.0001605845,0.000171276,0.00025922523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975973,0.001909063,0.00019439645,0.0001350717,0.00007338002,0.000090780464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041400404,0.0002587632,0.0002085434,0.0021803998,0.0028968856,0.0058326568,0.00057245436,0.0013943294,0.002109154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035501772,0.0002134292,0.000109733126,0.0022378508,0.034530018,0.004341607,0.0034201108,0.0016690119,0.00012683134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001640808,0.00002489692,0.0014889567,0.000051714407,0.0000068687846,0.00038011727,0.13279238,0.00028260553,0.00015603165,0.85006267,0.002159017,0.012578293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039442788,0.00011709807,0.018962964,0.0014687935,0.000016780075,0.00084155006,0.30775684,0.0012565599,0.0006154616,0.39000863,0.27885705,0.000058743186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01785709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019341825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01785709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010324741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021830914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074911654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382137424","doi":"10.1017/glj.2023.38","title":"Political Theory and the Volunteer: Lessons from Kahn’s Ethnography of ‘Our Unhappy Politics’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Happiness; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Law; Framing (construction); Ethnography; Democracy; Political science; Aesthetics; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.043637902759754876,"score_gpt":0.3923505951086683,"score_spread":0.34871269234891344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382137424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8051448,0.00397839,0.010533603,0.03115739,0.00048030086,0.00014384306,0.00009465865,0.00004949144,0.14841759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929234,0.0006929702,0.00052772486,0.0009910865,0.00006336275,0.00004702554,0.000013584851,0.000027076545,0.0047138245],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878749,0.010693133,0.00008251775,0.00035273732,0.00038101946,0.00061564107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98275083,0.015487859,0.00039765434,0.000488132,0.00038412155,0.000491366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093831755,0.0004171187,0.00048156548,0.0025124503,0.017094472,0.0069432002,0.0013060942,0.0020182964,0.0037031479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011070468,0.00041287838,0.00019229973,0.0022473126,0.047820605,0.010478323,0.0059925565,0.0047330814,0.00021651143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007726766,0.000016769125,0.00041720146,0.000024079287,0.0000014019529,0.00015659914,0.94710666,0.00004338891,0.000050714734,0.047585566,0.0018552777,0.002734561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034587908,0.000011905735,0.00049106736,0.00011735498,0.0000020886698,0.00013436863,0.9382395,0.000115504714,0.00008058955,0.011658757,0.049136348,0.000008978911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019166127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03722527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019166127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063847923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028990668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04962355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393126564","doi":"10.1017/glj.2023.87","title":"Civil Society as an Informal Institution in Ukraine’s Judicial Reform Process","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial reform; Ukrainian; Civil society; Political science; Institution; Politics; Law; Rule of law; Public administration","score_opus":0.027265187749228086,"score_gpt":0.3514104389606093,"score_spread":0.3241452512113812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393126564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.878919,0.0014309502,0.0056819753,0.0053615067,0.00005595295,0.000069747024,0.000029563296,0.00003688279,0.10841448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980013,0.00009365942,0.00022761333,0.00009805085,0.0000074022505,0.000004673691,0.000004155511,0.0000030345248,0.0015602262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641454,0.0020279791,0.00014600348,0.00030527313,0.0004450715,0.0006610605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722975,0.0011567486,0.00063305517,0.00025669695,0.00030080744,0.00042295584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033175508,0.00012398453,0.00024392376,0.001191381,0.0067946925,0.005779822,0.0004138517,0.001232564,0.002487069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038644685,0.00016680491,0.00018432016,0.0007670654,0.010245797,0.0022551108,0.0060724868,0.0013711465,0.0002638338],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035037236,0.000084092775,0.016898409,0.00011742985,0.000024211558,0.0019192526,0.15020654,0.0013087272,0.0014010445,0.795493,0.0019683286,0.030543976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047832902,0.00022308234,0.11034863,0.0008250502,0.000092778944,0.0012730836,0.22339167,0.006038572,0.0034187012,0.20095727,0.4532851,0.000098181095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011600708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014824599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011600708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007579142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062536243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054990828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402609061","doi":"10.1017/glj.2024.25","title":"Forms of Law for the Anthropocene: Civil Liability Revisited","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Anthropocene; Political science; Legal liability; Law; Liability; Philosophy; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.021505376871097017,"score_gpt":0.3598379724245598,"score_spread":0.3383325955534628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402609061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088126756,0.009211776,0.051556192,0.14229682,0.0005811586,0.00008104174,0.000081665676,0.00004809162,0.7080165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835376,0.001673771,0.002884079,0.0028650304,0.00038885008,0.00006799536,0.000016912136,0.000019898747,0.008545713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995659,0.0020878434,0.00011411365,0.0005563771,0.0009944057,0.00058840815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929093,0.004620494,0.00094631943,0.00050875143,0.00060718734,0.00040794341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053841947,0.00037117786,0.00046603772,0.0023571823,0.0061289766,0.0085554505,0.0017520915,0.0062156576,0.010070607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010819348,0.00027256567,0.000609854,0.0021483635,0.038971838,0.013259662,0.0059210467,0.0052048108,0.00048332955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010728394,0.0000023103644,0.00007918026,0.0000047200924,5.558847e-7,0.0000208999,0.00037688986,0.0001099697,0.000006795676,0.9984023,0.00026714933,0.00072820246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004795476,0.000007298503,0.0003679822,0.000076005155,0.0000025093966,0.000077457385,0.0010638767,0.0007881365,0.000025170339,0.9796147,0.017966956,0.000005268081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071415314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077905594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010070607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009243177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003345256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067064226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407986013","doi":"10.1017/glj.2024.80","title":"The “Hairs of Hope”: Toward a Fuller Understanding of the Legal, Material, and Social Infrastructure of Infrastructure","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.016940747615069033,"score_gpt":0.28139769687420724,"score_spread":0.2644569492591382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407986013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053601354,0.008325152,0.079402976,0.22913532,0.0006553172,0.00010419694,0.00011869537,0.00015544854,0.6285016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837622,0.0018081457,0.0037191554,0.0037312594,0.00019961012,0.00006234451,0.000026150035,0.000046767676,0.00664453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960995,0.002652593,0.00007070559,0.00026275727,0.0004481094,0.00046638687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954223,0.0028305752,0.00042786184,0.00048610693,0.00036591935,0.00046712952],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055491063,0.0005889398,0.00046060066,0.0035553107,0.0069152866,0.015617348,0.0021368403,0.0055716075,0.0054157767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057469187,0.0005534194,0.00061807805,0.001972043,0.11586675,0.02070882,0.008402089,0.008234314,0.00044523095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010828503,0.0000022479267,0.00005551177,0.0000074674927,6.575402e-7,0.000018819737,0.0036599583,0.00013012334,0.000009195673,0.9948809,0.0006577949,0.0005761856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033620563,0.0000055681226,0.0002114792,0.000121805686,0.0000023697696,0.00004463856,0.011628107,0.0007297122,0.000036610385,0.94809926,0.03910982,0.0000072416115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014738457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012608631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011187459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006887945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081171095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407986110","doi":"10.1017/glj.2024.72","title":"The Travel Visa as the Ubiquitous Legal Infrastructure of Everyday Global Mobility Arbitrariness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Business; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009434755277545372,"score_gpt":0.30961391186276965,"score_spread":0.30017915658522426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407986110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30196336,0.0017695059,0.014040676,0.021505972,0.00011958139,0.000026426316,0.00010858881,0.00011932587,0.66034657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99591607,0.00013915938,0.0003439098,0.00017936985,0.000019804404,0.0000054528064,0.000008724136,0.00001015748,0.003377456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984376,0.0008627268,0.000042845837,0.00019338037,0.00019082762,0.00027269547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985165,0.0005408816,0.0003158174,0.00026447515,0.00013385895,0.00022847112],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016086961,0.00012257777,0.00016231132,0.0011312519,0.0044604917,0.0105648,0.0005051731,0.0017561009,0.0083059855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025312027,0.00017150368,0.00015885872,0.0011228642,0.029338725,0.006193134,0.0064047105,0.0017211648,0.0005089413],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060502425,0.0000047108642,0.0009238144,0.000010744945,0.000002401368,0.00008331164,0.007857313,0.00015033512,0.00014603852,0.9858957,0.00087453943,0.0040450525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014246303,0.00006739642,0.010558763,0.00033861405,0.000023728231,0.0005486239,0.05753053,0.0018676921,0.00060266646,0.63801867,0.29038352,0.000045534638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006400418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076541565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00318474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023074744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027786314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413882454","doi":"10.1017/glj.2025.11","title":"Uncertainty and Tension in Constitutional Adjudication of Climate Mitigation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.008026956786072606,"score_gpt":0.31259269283025976,"score_spread":0.30456573604418713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413882454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28435454,0.008653847,0.17285174,0.17308363,0.0019594044,0.00055145577,0.000305684,0.00024654056,0.3579932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870588,0.0004634522,0.0054210545,0.004831565,0.00031522798,0.00015906901,0.000030992098,0.000037125137,0.0016826524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82415295,0.111641996,0.0121914735,0.013447197,0.029509258,0.009057118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8013319,0.16843751,0.0068484857,0.009243084,0.0122189615,0.0019201172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15206237,0.00040678788,0.0012917178,0.0035066865,0.016181534,0.023065696,0.0042842985,0.0143768545,0.0024768845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16941518,0.000977376,0.0010305366,0.0034886072,0.047997873,0.014828784,0.012108454,0.01617683,0.00034238157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002210575,0.000014948515,0.0005925877,0.000037405716,0.000017723502,0.00013101229,0.00508196,0.0010123681,0.00028190907,0.98676413,0.001281188,0.004762595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003133963,0.000027522281,0.0010284826,0.00033962334,0.00003348671,0.000054980268,0.0035055256,0.0028338244,0.00079954445,0.9670501,0.02421079,0.00008474857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013161002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013901935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15206237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01719907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01696008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8041923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54941906","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200013468","title":"If Derrida Had Played Football","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Consolation; HERO; Favourite; Dream; Aside; Legend; Football; Philosophy; Literature; Aesthetics; Art; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.04608607682706463,"score_gpt":0.27839875440489725,"score_spread":0.23231267757783264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W54941906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16613488,0.04522627,0.001587126,0.16498844,0.012315586,0.000092143026,0.001243562,0.00018462651,0.6082273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59904283,0.008400509,0.00052716816,0.026125882,0.00095121353,0.00007744075,0.0005223745,0.0001254621,0.36422703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885285,0.00030600882,0.000045952456,0.00027184925,0.00021645102,0.00030684224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994973,0.000111171525,0.00006656759,0.000034773257,0.00014386007,0.00014636946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008197145,0.0005578553,0.00039450434,0.0005388475,0.0038434474,0.0030672506,0.00081507466,0.0021511784,0.01800867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002989554,0.0002007588,0.00019910451,0.0005417097,0.0022470143,0.0016997787,0.0022310938,0.0018098268,0.0068566375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004186718,0.000082349434,0.011749268,0.0010426829,0.00004911863,0.005551716,0.17757513,0.00019924744,0.0038866487,0.19612046,0.5035419,0.09978292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028400098,0.00001072381,0.0019376173,0.00012093167,0.0000037616014,0.0003589946,0.012207289,0.000017174723,0.00034918528,0.000793676,0.9841855,0.000012232385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023681665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038643572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023681665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042371466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016898763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060245037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72642296","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200005083","title":"Third Party Liability for Hezbollah Attacks against Israel","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Missile; Ancient history; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01790723914665802,"score_gpt":0.32730697790077173,"score_spread":0.3093997387541137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72642296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03331565,0.0032095,0.0051581413,0.0145834,0.00095767184,0.0003600676,0.0012551557,0.0005169544,0.9406436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.685986,0.0025929618,0.003330375,0.014055338,0.0014361654,0.0006128106,0.0012768271,0.00014373513,0.29056576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994562,0.0012790775,0.000453508,0.00065742194,0.0019849602,0.0010631285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880993,0.0037867578,0.0018585797,0.0032941303,0.002236531,0.0007247777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044797915,0.0004211164,0.00049674354,0.0010536269,0.0020839344,0.005078678,0.0017356516,0.009649201,0.03504019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022887615,0.0004256492,0.000581989,0.0009821684,0.0013910335,0.0015100338,0.002750468,0.004309948,0.018228658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050026487,0.0002401191,0.017128173,0.0003815228,0.00017376487,0.006653698,0.004147593,0.0010054304,0.0039191977,0.35707375,0.50561213,0.10316441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001488689,0.000101780446,0.00908918,0.0012233629,0.00006486666,0.0057067694,0.0011384507,0.0027630934,0.002986128,0.026891932,0.94981086,0.00007465152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00413788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003356572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03504019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018372325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034784207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11722112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W83106703","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200006350","title":"Free Movement v. Social Rights in an Enlarged Union - the<i>Laval</i>and<i>Viking</i>Cases before the ECJ","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latvian; Free movement; Directive; Law; Labour law; Industrial action; Political science; Liability; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.02450347577759618,"score_gpt":0.30788623077840743,"score_spread":0.2833827550008112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W83106703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088251956,0.0024960872,0.002482076,0.014506783,0.00049555436,0.00007706607,0.000097921395,0.000061440376,0.89153105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8903803,0.00042306207,0.00070779596,0.010477529,0.0002482279,0.0001651466,0.00006354376,0.00004771346,0.09748656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861647,0.004178766,0.00047037745,0.002021403,0.0034383172,0.003726528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639267,0.0019816037,0.0002685953,0.0004857546,0.00055063184,0.00032074194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071448623,0.00061247085,0.0005386986,0.0015968325,0.010728581,0.015062035,0.0024190098,0.016111905,0.0060641686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010336569,0.00053451426,0.0012033783,0.0013441177,0.015922664,0.0046033626,0.009143311,0.008759156,0.001402055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055386558,0.00002509805,0.0003529565,0.000031482858,0.000010356817,0.0004319699,0.004307656,0.00020599632,0.00035623502,0.9840681,0.0065148515,0.0036400065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000280657,0.00032838003,0.0060830023,0.00072886364,0.00012334072,0.0007274469,0.011044289,0.00131246,0.0044888486,0.3202129,0.65443337,0.00023639324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07125116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05696232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07125116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009985757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008024058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14167285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9048260","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200005939","title":"Sexual Abuse of Children Abroad – A German Perspective on the Antalya Case","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"German legal, social, and political studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; German; Law; Perspective (graphical); Criticism; Criminology; Turkish; Political science; Girl; History; Sociology; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.019945892259352314,"score_gpt":0.3627356984492208,"score_spread":0.3427898061898685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9048260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7678242,0.017785508,0.00019761606,0.021938296,0.00022267828,0.000032928532,0.000091698734,0.0000086219625,0.19189851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858715,0.0049098697,0.000102895116,0.003193186,0.000046185272,0.000012918615,0.00001794881,0.000004651753,0.005840919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998887,0.0004290891,0.000040790663,0.000083799874,0.000119194316,0.0004400397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949896,0.00022099607,0.0001238657,0.000023088902,0.0000316814,0.00010129136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000857738,0.00026669772,0.00031180977,0.000997359,0.007284276,0.0035338239,0.00054961664,0.0028913664,0.002775321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096436933,0.00028144527,0.00023490815,0.0012632789,0.0077628097,0.0014478898,0.003374059,0.0025786785,0.00025272422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010098245,0.00021604006,0.02876549,0.0004235345,0.00006831864,0.1192046,0.18493195,0.00045087244,0.0016357215,0.6221587,0.01836514,0.023678591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049349714,0.00015244291,0.07394285,0.0018471956,0.00015160219,0.066115335,0.39066434,0.00041385044,0.0011815333,0.03051847,0.43483418,0.00012883758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04991114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089376345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04991114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006004532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028709823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09924126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}