{"meta":{"query_hash":"54390db30124","filters":{"venue":"German Law Journal"},"cohort_total":66,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":66,"exported":66,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/54390db30124","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=German+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W105928197","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200002613","title":"The European Court of Justice and “Total Market” Thinking","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Victory; Economic Justice; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Law; European Union law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.01391612822489121,"score_gpt":0.2771033505748997,"score_spread":0.2631872223500085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105928197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09266734,0.0004383002,0.000051074865,0.0027161548,0.00032211555,0.00005267636,0.0000017589449,0.000012473817,0.9037381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924583,0.00074609887,0.00010741959,0.00052444526,0.0007522408,2.7584792e-7,7.4269956e-8,0.000008313169,0.005402828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986551,0.0005996873,0.0001812568,0.00006280502,0.00028729162,0.0002138799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993307,0.00018379462,0.00019489852,0.000088061985,0.00009153625,0.000110982204],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001968038,0.000054765256,0.00006491364,0.000011351889,0.0018416106,0.0002469959,0.00025788278,0.000016741149,0.00015303599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013620728,0.000037365022,0.000036245572,0.000053447682,0.0004183882,0.00026773722,0.000059196886,0.00021003599,0.000046923917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008677656,0.000017246146,0.0002928401,0.000012358976,0.000023355165,0.000023116196,0.01239061,0.00000250154,0.00013680551,0.9079749,0.06359892,0.01551865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003631337,0.000038921975,0.15280627,0.00008741107,0.000049066097,0.00015612399,0.0038991545,0.000031844793,0.000032944678,0.019827027,0.8225445,0.00016359077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000942766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030263604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89979094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014298629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023062821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W121275545","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001437","title":"Teaching “Human Rights in Africa” Transnationally: Reflections on the Jos-Osgoode Virtual Classroom Experience","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Institution; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Plateau (mathematics); Sociology","score_opus":0.08648714055631132,"score_gpt":0.4336545503878741,"score_spread":0.3471674098315628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W121275545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1244686,0.000008527364,0.00022242608,0.15531251,0.00042390102,0.00010539225,0.0000016430033,0.00003443481,0.7194226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935421,0.0000024238298,0.00018708305,0.0028558273,0.0006193348,0.000008990595,0.0000019475813,0.000003725656,0.0027785744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982913,0.0005245869,0.0002985314,0.00012798727,0.0004871293,0.00027044266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924165,0.00028295067,0.00014253611,0.000120664554,0.00011346333,0.00009871064],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014344477,0.00008547669,0.000078490484,0.00013601447,0.0055016037,0.000430436,0.0003097864,0.00006644637,0.0007374296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013078138,0.0000641581,0.000054719403,0.00039817175,0.00014823653,0.0009872143,0.000004990024,0.0013352495,0.000040225576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054341435,0.00014235928,0.00001458552,1.5265871e-7,0.0000040921836,0.0000033300737,0.0703898,0.000016304366,0.00032565588,0.92591566,0.0027141706,0.00046844734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015138082,0.00006110118,0.0015313873,0.0000141272685,0.0000047592976,0.000015132859,0.0067387675,0.000009091414,0.000036783098,0.15684313,0.8344935,0.00010084919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004284994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0270642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8690735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021568312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018615405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1233816891","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200005125","title":"Discrimination in Individual-Related Employment – A View from Europe and Germany to Canada, analysing the Requirements and the Background of the European Anti-Discrimination Directives","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Member states; Law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; European union; Economic policy","score_opus":0.0378125544276793,"score_gpt":0.31782198847985343,"score_spread":0.28000943405217416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1233816891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94305414,0.00028482545,0.000032892425,0.009363901,0.00019073857,0.00024927442,0.000012865231,0.0000063751804,0.046805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901295,0.00010142557,0.000015253814,0.0005468434,0.00009758987,0.0000028931718,0.000005778571,0.000009662641,0.00020761939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962888,0.0022318205,0.00046086044,0.00015922468,0.0006529191,0.00020638775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992053,0.00016064479,0.00030553972,0.0001437538,0.00012185576,0.00006288924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030206563,0.00011141461,0.00016856093,0.000054585373,0.0011878122,0.00033137147,0.00030842374,0.000024366405,0.000019210956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056833338,0.0000610125,0.000043715932,0.0003458609,0.00050079444,0.000265716,0.00012735582,0.00017921292,0.0000010881257],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003825207,0.00017827238,0.012505143,0.000025153751,0.00015597235,0.000016794707,0.119236976,0.00009747647,0.0006471414,0.83806247,0.0008053615,0.028230997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064782,0.000009352901,0.97680837,0.0001261803,0.00012198566,0.000003985419,0.0082153,0.00003760502,0.000051957428,0.008190916,0.00567881,0.00010769405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50397354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87141436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96430326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010744557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91358113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141455327","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200000997","title":"<i>Book Review</i>- Ed Morgan,<i>The Aesthetics of International Law</i>(2007) - [Ed Morgan, The Aesthetics of International Law (2007), University of Toronto Press: Toronto, ISBN: 978–08020-9251-9, pp.272]","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Media studies; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.011110204995222372,"score_gpt":0.2205017756679592,"score_spread":0.20939157067273684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141455327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001266607,0.19700877,0.00025210888,0.014170483,0.0030636997,0.0005534184,0.00054611877,0.00006217036,0.78307664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7040023,0.17999779,0.0004999246,0.04659452,0.0042263623,0.0000060077364,0.00018860096,0.00012313538,0.06436137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997532,0.0002001786,0.00087996316,0.00022162958,0.00082205504,0.00034417034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978239,0.00009204367,0.0007077043,0.00044526067,0.0007504603,0.00018062748],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046017437,0.00027659748,0.00050216366,0.000012524207,0.0005040172,0.000080587735,0.0012706586,0.00012388498,0.007337162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023094477,0.00019627986,0.0003626472,0.000019404515,0.0010641603,0.0006509618,0.00014165977,0.00046759952,0.000019547268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009393239,0.00030732213,0.000009285655,0.00004918365,0.00012173238,0.000020167532,0.0026584615,0.000009576057,0.000035305115,0.7779313,0.21810174,0.00066201086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000625126,0.00023703813,0.00005460049,0.00028173105,0.00014881288,0.000071348266,0.0004475785,0.00017728662,0.000043356726,0.0028425104,0.99485964,0.00021098214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009738158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005025193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7767579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031717814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089770794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500769656","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200018964","title":"Fundamental Freedoms, Fundamental Rights, and the Scope of Free Movement Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Charter; International human rights law; Scope (computer science); Human rights; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.012874438950091894,"score_gpt":0.27751693541321987,"score_spread":0.264642496463128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500769656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10881915,0.001294463,0.000033532076,0.0024773984,0.00060226716,0.00012943886,0.000017194057,0.000014077059,0.8866125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956484,0.00032361853,0.00014740648,0.0017685054,0.0006643531,0.000001998033,0.0000012338869,0.0000067361952,0.0014377774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859685,0.00029530225,0.0002756642,0.00010582887,0.0005206911,0.00020567793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939847,0.00012302153,0.00017670303,0.00012100758,0.000084525425,0.00009626045],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011810126,0.000093509276,0.00016081079,0.00002025702,0.0015952543,0.00016863583,0.00037317252,0.000023689492,0.00037202908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027990844,0.000058533886,0.00008707482,0.000038865583,0.0020723557,0.00021715242,0.00015474638,0.00016968678,0.000026822054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003925325,0.000032853743,0.00015701486,0.0000030665706,0.00006325019,0.0000024554226,0.0022684804,7.818848e-7,0.000079429665,0.9912837,0.005771187,0.00029851138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002135557,0.00010358309,0.0013734464,0.000055572615,0.000029092129,0.000013680177,0.00095977,0.000010946286,0.00031334342,0.13073796,0.8641487,0.00011836495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007659048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011908688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8868292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005832798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013433035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509905651","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200020642","title":"Interest-Balancing vs. Fiduciary Duty: Two Models for National Security Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Duty; Political science; Human rights; Balance (ability); Public interest; Torture; National security; State (computer science); Enforcement; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04970016788889059,"score_gpt":0.3642283763617564,"score_spread":0.31452820847286583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509905651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35517776,0.00016779745,0.001237274,0.0015889877,0.0027005624,0.00023413547,0.00006869479,0.00006689379,0.6387579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902108,0.000004555258,0.00046130072,0.0018770572,0.0057426686,0.000009698666,0.0000133066715,0.000013604876,0.0016670342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984488,0.00011647729,0.00027368806,0.00012132004,0.0005728496,0.00046686153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990004,0.00013847962,0.00015405686,0.00006693999,0.00041038386,0.00022977186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014640542,0.000111266156,0.00013962608,0.000051960447,0.001916405,0.00022720627,0.0002994919,0.000074477575,0.000621302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024122846,0.00009847289,0.00015367447,0.000028208251,0.00020871553,0.0013287332,0.000035851932,0.00027468996,0.000066321714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025440284,0.000058336755,0.000025095644,0.000005369599,0.00003150502,0.0000029732985,0.003946963,0.000014804165,0.000018627637,0.9917971,0.004042925,0.00003085119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003097318,0.000015859932,0.000053645417,0.000024761464,0.000010139191,0.000033557295,0.00006244737,0.0002668746,0.00010013583,0.7520749,0.24693123,0.00011673863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007479402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012904583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63709086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027211139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012196853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530569893","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001474","title":"Canadian Legal Ethics: Ready for the Twenty-First Century at Last","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal ethics; Political science; Legal education; Legal profession; Legal realism; Law; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Public administration","score_opus":0.07947018377858342,"score_gpt":0.3855986025917223,"score_spread":0.3061284188131389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530569893","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01669417,0.00036756622,0.000085094995,0.65167344,0.0047287564,0.0003113114,0.00004020806,0.000032856464,0.3260666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767944,0.00063447567,0.00017599599,0.011328786,0.0021569808,0.000013241385,0.000011697961,0.000010902703,0.008873498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988808,0.0001521315,0.00019486473,0.00008859231,0.00032868236,0.0003549451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984426,0.0006209789,0.00014073154,0.0001236409,0.0003868387,0.0002852085],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014160939,0.0000671955,0.00006630597,0.000058949823,0.01220309,0.0003209707,0.0002756483,0.000101661426,0.0011100303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005192036,0.00005173493,0.00005901777,0.00020476553,0.00027153565,0.00064335286,0.000013490336,0.0009510108,0.00018301416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010106793,0.000025123507,0.00070530496,0.0000025354148,0.00002742069,0.000013548572,0.045019485,0.000008309333,0.000004563066,0.68917847,0.2645128,0.00049233006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013005974,0.000010398242,0.0012697913,0.0000055940773,0.000013200192,0.00014493386,0.0037448904,0.000004713721,0.000004560111,0.00059510337,0.99400216,0.00007458328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5007394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.954104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96010023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000518216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002590931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538824565","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017946","title":"Canadian Mining Companies and Domestic Law Reform: A Critical Legal Account*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Government (linguistics); Public administration; State (computer science); Political science; Civil society; Parliament; Law reform; Corporate law; Law; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Corporate governance; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.010653906808134236,"score_gpt":0.24674446117421478,"score_spread":0.23609055436608054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538824565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61842155,0.0019675759,0.00015179327,0.00064587477,0.0008833714,0.000046288915,0.00000640803,0.000094102536,0.37778303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824834,0.000017308721,0.0005384292,0.0004061243,0.0005941327,0.0000020827763,0.0000016208699,0.000023832485,0.00016814192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904156,0.000020007477,0.00017644645,0.00006718094,0.00014576029,0.00054904446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993321,0.000029577966,0.000015858446,0.000099010045,0.000020315956,0.0005031417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002596147,0.00012505241,0.00014019402,0.00008341024,0.00041988457,0.00020769493,0.00009967606,0.00005385885,0.00010570358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075519956,0.00010696639,0.000033146094,0.000047065565,0.0000918069,0.00026034197,0.000028359886,0.0002740976,0.00003926805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018354065,0.00005947018,0.0016305274,0.00037625886,0.00033128748,0.0008736803,0.01405446,0.0020708758,0.00018772512,0.9554646,0.017878775,0.0070540123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039691443,0.000042813426,0.003946128,0.00015062174,0.000081670965,0.0035427455,0.0020335477,0.005082395,0.00002852376,0.00018935192,0.98410827,0.00039704228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011466361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017641854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9662295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001957696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011719279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99511635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551813341","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017958","title":"The Equator Principles: Evaluating the Exposure of Commercial Lenders to Socio-Environmental Risk","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Project finance; Context (archaeology); Business; Risk management; Risk analysis (engineering); Finance","score_opus":0.07642939184365957,"score_gpt":0.3198428286109884,"score_spread":0.24341343676732882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551813341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98487234,0.0002979342,0.00015131156,0.002911188,0.00076119776,0.00030522546,0.0000039754545,0.000026049995,0.010670755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948948,0.000015844076,0.00012601957,0.001661719,0.0031672155,0.000015124687,0.0000038656767,0.000030093526,0.00008531509],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794024,0.0001520241,0.0004641031,0.00013048168,0.000699288,0.00061385887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871445,0.00019965305,0.00064469967,0.00033075362,0.000060225528,0.00005023483],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004303315,0.00018039183,0.00016717098,0.000068597416,0.0020079608,0.0004275137,0.0006925252,0.000060161427,0.00017379828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024736018,0.00010632899,0.00014826315,0.00017022822,0.00020104783,0.0011536651,0.00041299654,0.00049737835,0.00026941366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044034017,0.00049870746,0.6352229,0.00011012573,0.00057374156,0.000008566857,0.011203903,0.00047353547,0.004450255,0.25432983,0.022328358,0.07035976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024638425,0.00017011401,0.41064304,0.00010450021,0.0004690751,0.00007681857,0.019932479,0.0017204123,0.0004586736,0.004824612,0.5582607,0.00087575166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011900607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006789784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5359323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010251694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028466597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586402922","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200018782","title":"Book Reviews, The Common Law Tort of Defamation, and the Suppression of Scholarly Debate","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Complaint; Tort; Academic freedom; Law; Political science; Cause of action; Action (physics); Work (physics); Sociology; Plaintiff; Higher education; Engineering","score_opus":0.015841370395712293,"score_gpt":0.31296752139690026,"score_spread":0.29712615100118794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586402922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58049166,0.037780352,0.00034364394,0.035235,0.002757217,0.001407693,0.000012696342,0.00004397305,0.34192774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99576443,0.001909173,0.00019410852,0.0015454841,0.00022356582,0.0000039223646,0.0000010256587,0.000004361514,0.0003539456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848205,0.00054600247,0.00039696903,0.000061136474,0.0003978958,0.00011594118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887615,0.00021448202,0.00044392934,0.00019324104,0.00019836765,0.00007381547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032165197,0.000061628656,0.00017445046,0.000019599927,0.0010987818,0.00020482024,0.00031881494,0.00007082016,0.00031808403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018512856,0.000029693187,0.00007932278,0.00006879982,0.0010123105,0.00093019404,0.00004842954,0.00038539636,0.000006266952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005677776,0.000026049494,0.00033393095,0.000018752966,0.0000104762175,7.788967e-7,0.008056338,0.0000011936642,0.0060060327,0.930436,0.05178267,0.0032709881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075873034,0.000020418163,0.0017025365,0.00016093426,0.00003179034,0.00002780633,0.00080239266,0.000034917466,0.0022013686,0.03380739,0.9603825,0.00006919697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011953019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002107035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90859985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007400461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031874908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8451053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161718753","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200005009","title":"Redefining the Traditional Pillars of German Legal Studies and Setting the Stage for Contemporary Interdisciplinary Research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Law and Political Science","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"German; Scholarship; Political science; Politics; Legal research; Product (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Public administration; History","score_opus":0.18630624683551744,"score_gpt":0.46592471063961793,"score_spread":0.2796184638041005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161718753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7375329,0.002684916,0.0000876884,0.06620734,0.00050313515,0.0003838272,0.000055881592,0.000018719411,0.19252558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978793,0.000030401996,0.00012143454,0.00028771744,0.0009471798,0.000008967938,0.0000014017356,0.000004867435,0.000718676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802536,0.0005543222,0.000290184,0.000119569144,0.0006075465,0.00040300685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974143,0.0020691634,0.000121117846,0.000092679154,0.00021698746,0.00008576426],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00655881,0.00006887837,0.00012372034,0.000029156608,0.005225705,0.00022559741,0.000342045,0.000037615286,0.000021203134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015832704,0.00003632773,0.00007252132,0.00013672723,0.0028551393,0.00031430184,0.00014880614,0.0003450784,0.000001458108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000151354725,0.000013152032,0.00019976907,0.000011958195,0.000014933214,0.00000872286,0.008463665,0.0000033801607,0.00007431228,0.9781374,0.012679908,0.00037767002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003950083,0.00018193347,0.005234376,0.00013759287,0.000016106014,0.00007781826,0.031992387,0.00006692981,0.00016402784,0.70610714,0.25548372,0.00014293715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089578924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011711179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27203023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059997743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017310667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1687988153","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200012670","title":"Slaughterhouse-Six: Updating the Law of War","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"American Political and Social Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Rationality; Normative; Law; Creatures; Spanish Civil War; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014961580807742332,"score_gpt":0.24408131949950615,"score_spread":0.22911973869176383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1687988153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2360814,0.00016031008,0.00015673116,0.0039327065,0.000633555,0.00007700519,0.00004018923,0.000045837034,0.7588723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995593,0.000015539035,0.00010247314,0.0025772192,0.00127599,0.0000010309836,0.0000019104461,0.000014309018,0.00041854236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920577,0.000039704828,0.00026301137,0.000061539686,0.00018669199,0.00024326236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956703,0.0000394304,0.00013579467,0.00010018354,0.00008222252,0.000075343974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014837216,0.000084564315,0.00014343609,0.000013009352,0.0010159983,0.00008708429,0.00019179888,0.000023056426,0.00055235374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000073566516,0.000052131978,0.00011918569,0.000016826714,0.0010159818,0.00015160015,0.000035053283,0.0002625434,0.000048861253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034031455,0.000025244593,0.0000048880765,0.000005058223,0.000022780583,0.000008256795,0.01835963,0.000015369693,0.000010171455,0.9809106,0.0002995392,0.00033507776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061949244,0.00016087023,0.00009195381,0.00007370374,0.00006861328,0.00011028337,0.023133839,0.000046340432,0.00010970952,0.51605266,0.45927292,0.00025960535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021895156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029346936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7595116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000338946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027060052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78143406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W169302879","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200002674","title":"Transnational Legal Discourse: Reflections on My Time with the German Law Journal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"German; Scholarship; Political science; Law; Audience measurement; Supreme court; Legal education; Politics; Legal profession; Legal realism; Sociology; Media studies; History","score_opus":0.033020544362927035,"score_gpt":0.37860747092951114,"score_spread":0.3455869265665841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W169302879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18602784,0.00012854443,0.00036070158,0.1352531,0.00059162994,0.00021865117,0.000011801532,0.00003410987,0.67737365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99088496,0.000029858173,0.00009052791,0.0018274102,0.0017615583,0.000015631831,0.0000026557375,0.000012168892,0.005375253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980095,0.0002672938,0.00026912315,0.00013927523,0.0009520802,0.00036274744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988497,0.0001673907,0.00019394123,0.000095720185,0.000511237,0.00018200275],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005705397,0.00015508232,0.00016463747,0.00006171664,0.0063957903,0.0008645154,0.00039998445,0.00004442804,0.0027829646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000106247935,0.00009164519,0.00014717749,0.00014826485,0.0008554564,0.0010505908,0.000021314278,0.0006872289,0.00023058972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026053332,0.000073267365,0.000017276929,5.431311e-7,0.00012755446,0.000013941923,0.005591844,0.000041451753,0.00012723885,0.9590794,0.034647465,0.00025395947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003995396,0.00018549849,0.0017034581,0.000020099505,0.000035590536,0.00031492408,0.0027081792,0.000028751252,0.00004673843,0.028908202,0.96547526,0.0001737364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012184327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014938522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9308278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017466456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012885599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99812865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1773203579","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200013122","title":"Ideas, Institutions and the Exhaustion of<i>Modell Deutschland?</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Capitalism; Supervisory board; Ackermann function; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Politics; Management; Sociology; Economic history; History; Economics","score_opus":0.017856500188604484,"score_gpt":0.23044180882651494,"score_spread":0.21258530863791045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1773203579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9376552,0.00084843975,0.0046001724,0.003189151,0.0004416703,0.00014334456,0.0000027245412,0.00002924648,0.053090055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99737173,0.0001296867,0.00007155249,0.0015673062,0.0008105529,0.0000019967604,0.000003079896,0.0000063603447,0.000037731555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941957,0.000005605583,0.00020364694,0.00007626027,0.00016615755,0.00012873505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953204,0.000009623614,0.00025164607,0.00009919687,0.00009606121,0.000011413606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030355938,0.00008046804,0.0001186645,0.00003917509,0.00045784833,0.00017779417,0.000119135795,0.000029756142,0.000035852077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000120710565,0.00005147829,0.000060676677,0.00013315552,0.00022116303,0.0008571909,0.000056673223,0.00015996739,0.000038980827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005745722,0.0000203218,0.00037475285,0.000018494546,0.000013395568,0.00001266695,0.00005057659,0.0008065238,0.00009099935,0.99714935,0.00061599066,0.0007894813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008155526,0.000018300778,0.00766396,0.0002567372,0.00023857363,0.00040244375,0.00022126304,0.0007994345,0.00014822326,0.5119308,0.46982983,0.00033489708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012846736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069587526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48521852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015388025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027467584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35214457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849900527","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200018769","title":"A Viking We Will Go! Neo-Corporatism and Social Europe","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Single market; Economics; Politics; European integration; Restructuring; Free trade; European union; Liberalization; Political economy; Market economy; Political science; Economy; International trade; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.020163727169367773,"score_gpt":0.2987029216835848,"score_spread":0.27853919451421705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1849900527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47186923,0.0002518867,0.0001290694,0.016667483,0.0014283969,0.000090216694,0.000013911966,0.0000717098,0.5094781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99131936,0.0003083897,0.00023441142,0.0019149035,0.0027125021,4.6777984e-7,6.5107787e-7,0.00001554424,0.0034937747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988919,0.00019695514,0.00018545277,0.00012294462,0.0002966055,0.00030616455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994194,0.00004172119,0.00022069822,0.000075046264,0.00008412094,0.00015900323],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006764037,0.000091137,0.000109938024,0.000028908553,0.001987621,0.0003099774,0.00023428771,0.00006486225,0.0001870903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057891175,0.000084190884,0.00004642509,0.00011526197,0.00044737113,0.00053422607,0.000053506832,0.00061361206,0.00009399877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061802925,0.000013375085,0.00026899728,0.0000029155738,0.000007242867,0.00006810133,0.011015141,1.493652e-7,0.0011410251,0.97408384,0.0065894276,0.0068035903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022459411,0.000015515885,0.006261108,0.000014403057,0.0000073365914,0.00010151943,0.00017651435,0.000002959505,0.000037035097,0.012502895,0.980536,0.000120118566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044678722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035992127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9739466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000155979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007132036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189986100","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001486","title":"Nurturing Commitment in the Legal Profession: Student Experiences with the Osgoode Public Interest Requirement","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Political science; Law; Public interest; Legal profession; Work (physics); Practice of law; Legal education; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09629140431203458,"score_gpt":0.43894372862530706,"score_spread":0.34265232431327247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189986100","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45493317,0.00007522349,0.00002784644,0.47638956,0.00043537663,0.00020692968,1.6956716e-7,0.000010874524,0.067920856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912196,0.000017444818,0.00005497968,0.007786,0.00053984934,0.000039361927,7.8232506e-7,0.0000027775345,0.00033919842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982321,0.0005927241,0.00023245411,0.000094643685,0.00058617897,0.00026189117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935126,0.00011674329,0.00019156272,0.00015880418,0.00011320343,0.0000684044],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002205674,0.000077249795,0.00006984413,0.000045403274,0.0023377286,0.0012625123,0.0006019006,0.00002749041,0.00027957078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045655397,0.000036902573,0.000027756594,0.00034695567,0.0002036472,0.0011724574,0.000021245727,0.00070642616,0.000011348957],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010650718,0.00024591852,0.00038863628,6.881945e-7,0.0000093271965,0.00001439503,0.36486173,0.0000011080903,0.000008108195,0.6236403,0.008309073,0.0025100864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001652989,0.00007648418,0.00441863,0.000025756432,0.000005498941,0.0000348922,0.5118575,0.0000012089058,0.000013697641,0.00072204287,0.4826179,0.00006107693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006933179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017226674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62291825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014653064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031560735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W197470741","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200000213","title":"Book Review - Jean McKenzie Leiper's <i>Bar Codes: Women in the Legal Profession</i> - [Jean McKenzie Leiper, Bar Codes: Women in the Legal Profession, UBC Press, Toronto, 2006, ISBN 978–0-7748-1320-4, pp. 242, $29.99]","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Bar (unit); Law; Political science; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.028694112820108496,"score_gpt":0.34755778768745355,"score_spread":0.31886367486734507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W197470741","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044218704,0.1882194,0.00005948724,0.48670515,0.005706553,0.0061309137,0.00020803462,0.00029678695,0.26845494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49001217,0.20317236,0.0002830855,0.20632164,0.0061823037,0.002119625,0.0001840345,0.0001989151,0.09152586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988372,0.0049959896,0.0018232221,0.0006411205,0.0021135018,0.0020541647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562395,0.0011080486,0.0011084055,0.0009733025,0.00059239543,0.000593912],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013212299,0.0005780129,0.00084275584,0.00011873412,0.004976616,0.0009933288,0.0023217709,0.000364404,0.012083102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015151036,0.00038155916,0.0002365365,0.0010120145,0.0009505972,0.006012517,0.0001675858,0.0035496103,0.00019365714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010648427,0.0008759419,0.00027400977,0.0001512468,0.000057420755,0.00015539967,0.12675858,0.000013265292,0.000019794807,0.027031807,0.84352833,0.0010277241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009670601,0.00013728908,0.0006700605,0.0007789586,0.0000405262,0.00021272566,0.07121009,0.000020720225,0.0000083606255,0.00051940436,0.9249418,0.00049302325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034084328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026486425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44579348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017505902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003926799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119180133","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200012426","title":"Coalition Procurement for the Reconstruction of Iraq in the Crosshairs of WTO Law: The Obligations of the United States under the WTO Government Procurement Agreement","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Law; Procurement; Competition (biology); Government (linguistics); Government procurement; State (computer science); Political science; International trade law; Sovereignty; Public international law; International economic law; Sovereign state; Conflict of laws; International trade; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.026264210006001047,"score_gpt":0.25541628950525186,"score_spread":0.22915207949925082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119180133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.853182,0.00021227976,0.004658158,0.10990493,0.0009961342,0.004444283,0.000078983874,0.000017563028,0.02650567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98856354,0.0000281105,0.000053434356,0.010949634,0.00023752607,0.00009934874,0.000018032677,0.000008266672,0.00004213614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981388,0.00006124954,0.0006380869,0.00010243825,0.00089626986,0.00016318433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984081,0.000102889404,0.0008619828,0.0002277989,0.00039213858,0.0000071263858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013126798,0.00012889745,0.00011487337,0.000039195063,0.0007793955,0.00017831863,0.0005017985,0.000028288025,0.00006918864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023629502,0.000051261894,0.00014462914,0.00026606512,0.00037744886,0.0003683741,0.00006714618,0.00018742641,0.0000021162953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051610437,0.00017810754,0.00028620294,0.000052416537,0.000095709365,1.3270113e-7,0.00070356973,0.008499368,0.00055706716,0.9884694,0.001012906,0.0000934755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062075723,0.00031702968,0.036200743,0.0011123664,0.00068004266,0.000061820654,0.045856584,0.010631672,0.0290427,0.6090588,0.26034585,0.0004848314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013143249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033087817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37941065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014921003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5994559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21605983","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001498","title":"Student Participation in Legal Education in Germany and Europe","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bologna Process; Curriculum; Political science; Parliament; German; Competence (human resources); Legal education; Higher education; Public relations; Pedagogy; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02568255837110394,"score_gpt":0.4457869831115504,"score_spread":0.42010442474044646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21605983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80502206,0.00010240412,0.000009790303,0.033467606,0.00036364773,0.00008555683,2.0244387e-7,0.000008354005,0.16094035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602354,0.00011949011,0.000115745715,0.0024938078,0.00032028434,0.0000034342177,0.0000012661337,0.000002787417,0.0009196427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906063,0.00024155452,0.00025319628,0.00008161575,0.00019655745,0.00016641822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959403,0.000042883745,0.000106956075,0.000054190863,0.00011843088,0.00008352974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009497981,0.000047772566,0.000063029285,0.00013451918,0.0003202782,0.00034430833,0.00008262603,0.0000340163,0.00015720369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012925721,0.000048893224,0.000010536872,0.00038346183,0.000048360376,0.0012368577,0.000006427388,0.0003855029,0.000031633943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012003921,0.00057161937,0.015505298,0.0000017646779,0.0000026227042,0.000010841185,0.030997938,0.000013210879,0.00014796876,0.9150938,0.0023000613,0.035342917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017790202,0.000021053187,0.59442586,0.000016736807,0.0000034615139,0.000012584925,0.0021515682,0.000008032124,0.000006422974,0.003680411,0.3994317,0.00006429069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002575057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010679496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9114134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107308864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063539785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59594095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197411641","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200020630","title":"From Theory to Practice: Exploring the Relevance of the Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations (DARIO)—The Responsibility of the WTO and the UN","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Political science; International law; Relevance (law); Subject (documents); General assembly; Competition (biology); Law; Public international law; Work (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.021284798362751062,"score_gpt":0.30572368601372685,"score_spread":0.2844388876509758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197411641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8138422,0.00017401869,0.00016550836,0.18280628,0.0008103752,0.00045659926,0.000024207513,0.000009718538,0.0017111277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774635,0.00006527043,0.00015098079,0.0014479898,0.00035976997,0.000008458385,3.3036142e-7,0.0000145931235,0.00020623396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99265856,0.0054500564,0.0005552516,0.00015449978,0.0009530099,0.00022861251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882205,0.009556341,0.0006525349,0.00087240356,0.00062813656,0.00007008678],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010122931,0.00012035018,0.00016359559,0.00002670361,0.002186054,0.00012376856,0.0013351868,0.000044311546,0.00032385334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017168,0.000044262277,0.00010284138,0.0009272281,0.0024749236,0.00047483467,0.00033270562,0.00051546266,0.0000057422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041960916,0.00011713913,0.0070922943,0.0000023303737,0.00009258905,2.2301577e-7,0.09173727,0.00007942642,0.0017999101,0.8976081,0.00041282017,0.00063826644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010767739,0.00004966328,0.6106508,0.00017337762,0.00031686184,0.000032815675,0.052560873,0.0000436654,0.044732407,0.14529528,0.14483811,0.00022940914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056956266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015270719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75231284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009701352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019522556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252546294","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017971","title":"Do Lenders Make Effective Regulators? An Assessment of the Equator Principles on Project Finance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Project finance; Finance; Compliance (psychology); Business; Public finance; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.052455260200587446,"score_gpt":0.3436593265213931,"score_spread":0.29120406632080564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252546294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9386222,0.000058480713,0.00009095047,0.00040072305,0.00089248334,0.0005696811,0.0000024823999,0.000044893884,0.059318114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971514,0.0000036819133,0.00025194467,0.0007070799,0.0017239061,0.000029789957,0.0000034351563,0.00003477262,0.0000940399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813807,0.00011899213,0.00036330216,0.0002143169,0.000616739,0.0005485661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859583,0.000059080852,0.0006847027,0.0004702857,0.00016547357,0.000024637417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016620078,0.00022786287,0.00024235286,0.00018848144,0.0005060496,0.0003426179,0.00056078774,0.00008336422,0.000045814384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008961898,0.00015258821,0.00015315892,0.00041348962,0.00013096131,0.001774113,0.0002360888,0.00045079394,0.00002751423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057941932,0.00034785678,0.051012088,0.00012855121,0.00008019788,0.0000058556425,0.00035838698,0.00012953456,0.00060350157,0.941498,0.0012982853,0.0044798176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016439038,0.000113183734,0.731606,0.00036970922,0.00013349438,0.00006892253,0.00051344855,0.0017162067,0.0020495022,0.006285576,0.2548748,0.0006252769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000096750795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000791451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93521243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014896717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007739857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62223667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261920639","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200013109","title":"National Courts, Global Cartels: F. Hoffman-LaRoche Ltd. v. Empagran, S.A. (U.S. Supreme Court 2004)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Supreme court; Cartel; Law; Damages; Plaintiff; Political science; Enforcement; Conflict of laws; Economics; Law and economics; Jurisdiction; Incentive","score_opus":0.023313877182919315,"score_gpt":0.25081209850065495,"score_spread":0.22749822131773562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261920639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14172888,0.014544394,0.038278043,0.01604102,0.00409836,0.00031554286,0.0012776316,0.00021177351,0.78350437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521077,0.000323967,0.00072652474,0.0021957636,0.00076972455,0.000006099872,0.000058858473,0.000020137903,0.0006881751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814004,0.000027845454,0.00082768244,0.0003349358,0.0002304095,0.0004390884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988525,0.000012839339,0.00039848778,0.00023666858,0.00020899637,0.0002905231],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077425834,0.00021865637,0.00042737383,0.00017756135,0.0005304407,0.00027100183,0.000371661,0.00011783317,0.0038363673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034106175,0.00024484447,0.0003652046,0.00030762298,0.00010084953,0.00040209986,0.000042368094,0.00033787906,0.0020558329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015518111,0.00016620138,0.0030596594,0.000008373036,0.00021116695,0.000042833526,0.00016503525,0.0010622238,0.000010453583,0.9637173,0.031403255,0.00013801105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019154457,0.00006422458,0.010015424,0.000028673796,0.000038069353,0.000536181,0.0000906767,0.00034534006,0.000046146662,0.58256495,0.40387315,0.0004817181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035622588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041679933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8534819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045671343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009933996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329083518","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200014139","title":"Comparative Law's Coming of Age? Twenty Years after<i>Critical Comparisons</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Nothing; Law; Casual; Mythology; Political science; History; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Classics","score_opus":0.053437425556907815,"score_gpt":0.39635652600874577,"score_spread":0.34291910045183793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329083518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67827976,0.0015358961,0.0005742804,0.0026841538,0.0006541344,0.00013882536,0.000029089668,0.000031981777,0.31607187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727327,0.00005670217,0.0010877458,0.00058617635,0.0007565009,0.00000480309,0.0000015545394,0.000005339682,0.00022793785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984774,0.00023311735,0.0003700629,0.00012274412,0.00050748204,0.0002891985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991323,0.0002620353,0.00013198791,0.00008086885,0.00024706757,0.00014577407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004361264,0.00010667648,0.00032231002,0.00004000646,0.00071552076,0.00011786251,0.0002489338,0.000041361538,0.000506954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002254464,0.00010262027,0.0001340465,0.00008750677,0.0011244968,0.0003873304,0.00006787319,0.00028524216,0.000094107556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005698028,0.00015261256,0.001037543,0.0000036428946,0.00007931438,0.000032947453,0.015491362,0.000027781629,0.00009981714,0.9677936,0.0149249,0.00029948622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003641823,0.00005851249,0.0074243224,0.00006921665,0.000030883068,0.000017711445,0.0026858733,0.00006110166,0.00046160378,0.0063170646,0.98234636,0.00016316606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011966286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018741041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010363129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004261654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25228476","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200018630","title":"<i>Review Essay</i>– Fuyuki Kurasawa's, The Work of Global Justice: Human Rights as Practices (2007) - [Fuyuki Kurasawa, The Work of Global Justice – Human Rights as Practices (Cambridge University Press, 2007); ISBN: 9780521673914; 256 pp.; $31.99 Paperback]","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Global justice; Solidarity; Politics; Sociology; Globalization; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018926398678755927,"score_gpt":0.3412748121562347,"score_spread":0.3223484134774787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25228476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4725897,0.027319593,0.000018889092,0.012616685,0.004770623,0.0017389626,0.00028893823,0.00014870189,0.48050788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806579,0.010416188,0.00029865984,0.002316031,0.0031267717,0.000008139888,0.00004460891,0.00004041473,0.0030913325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916929,0.0022161861,0.0014244055,0.0008213981,0.0023775694,0.0014675445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890902,0.0011168617,0.0063595646,0.0013337908,0.0013354725,0.0007641333],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004665983,0.00075591175,0.0010598471,0.000032987693,0.00922019,0.0007872448,0.0037619176,0.0006214768,0.0008871458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093199755,0.000524103,0.0006561376,0.0014428656,0.0028944162,0.0023749976,0.0005502905,0.0024619463,0.00022220128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030934846,0.0007483967,0.0015700503,0.00041056465,0.0004890992,0.00027512637,0.0010791224,0.000023081315,0.000042973625,0.70054364,0.2942942,0.00021434732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093757064,0.00021503297,0.003499124,0.0010059465,0.0035019524,0.00031281446,0.0024624837,0.000008823021,0.000011840862,0.0047639795,0.98260343,0.0006770193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046621848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059586026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6957797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056662085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085772836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558981804","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017867","title":"‘In a Settled Country, Everyone Must Eat’: Four Questions About Transnational Private Regulation, Migration, and Migrant Work","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mohawk; Work (physics); Political science; Colonialism; Media studies; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Library science","score_opus":0.01589076365390667,"score_gpt":0.2955271257389003,"score_spread":0.2796363620849936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558981804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.960882,0.00079744135,0.0012261213,0.02379275,0.0014049206,0.00030849312,0.00005179335,0.00005148588,0.011485009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955144,0.000067837595,0.00050456676,0.0007766671,0.0010429212,0.000012117949,0.000024811226,0.0000116448355,0.0020450407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983473,0.00019731554,0.00035689847,0.00012239964,0.0006042354,0.00037188674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928474,0.000091869246,0.00012825115,0.00007343018,0.00022096968,0.000200763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010213989,0.00011625048,0.0001303316,0.000110961184,0.00092225027,0.0001694929,0.00013849317,0.00009388165,0.00065961404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004395265,0.00011133493,0.000053065854,0.00026872836,0.0001976869,0.0010804626,0.000011754085,0.00021566456,0.000019004034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032266806,0.000075820346,0.035580963,0.0000037412367,0.000025562675,0.000005749736,0.006139363,0.000048026723,0.00011367625,0.9542701,0.0036427707,0.00006192306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045924293,0.000011199301,0.3672994,0.00004010318,0.000020190051,0.00004988872,0.00009870675,0.000028496832,0.000021169135,0.01313451,0.6186892,0.00014793893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014121409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017394926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94113564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017442438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075604796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9706778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585534320","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001450","title":"'In the Public Interest': The Responsibilities and Rights of Government Lawyers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Professional responsibility; Legal ethics; Law; Private rights; Economic Justice; Professional ethics; Democracy; Public interest; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05216139345106101,"score_gpt":0.38516743859201297,"score_spread":0.33300604514095195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585534320","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43202227,0.00008791402,0.0000051568304,0.4685109,0.00023493805,0.00006748999,0.0000016295527,0.0000026344237,0.099067055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949761,0.000031457403,0.00004016892,0.0040443307,0.00017603458,0.0000011053608,1.305455e-7,9.0584007e-7,0.000729743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895686,0.00044378103,0.00015957197,0.000042501102,0.00028877414,0.00010848933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993467,0.00036452108,0.00011091271,0.00009088473,0.00005598705,0.00003102479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022335828,0.000032806383,0.000043197553,0.000019526786,0.00075708097,0.00027744778,0.00019510894,0.000021262409,0.000218785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023476142,0.000017327351,0.000020489177,0.00016254418,0.00024525786,0.0006094863,0.000007156806,0.0003180557,0.000003831975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009882636,0.00003256322,0.000060918417,4.0428634e-7,0.0000030775452,0.0000018095463,0.031447224,6.2087906e-8,0.000017852159,0.95693564,0.010857929,0.0006326579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007475884,0.000024882955,0.003627108,0.0000052032537,0.0000037244909,0.000028788254,0.021570351,9.814576e-7,0.000020547792,0.07968865,0.89492935,0.000025673204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007282831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011055325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8840714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051755032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010396575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6169131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599196203","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200020964","title":"Sovereignty and Crimea: How Referendum Democracy Complicates Constituent Power in Multinational Societies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Secession; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Independence (probability theory); Democracy; Law; Territorial integrity; Political economy; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.049591547243615114,"score_gpt":0.3395510358353938,"score_spread":0.28995948859177867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599196203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39876688,0.0007378493,0.0002839121,0.029759683,0.0008260831,0.00029019007,0.000069411515,0.00008318197,0.5691828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973716,0.000050961993,0.00088218896,0.00089912367,0.00019242874,0.0000025628844,0.0000070222904,0.00000840496,0.00058570475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842346,0.00022049062,0.0002182412,0.00015863206,0.0005199634,0.0004592404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989227,0.00016648413,0.000107759995,0.00008417131,0.00029416147,0.0004247373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008653805,0.00011895804,0.00017930075,0.00005305405,0.0006717998,0.00027799828,0.00020713249,0.00011221011,0.0001590603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028446957,0.00011033315,0.000053888954,0.000091973685,0.0009882372,0.00045868588,0.00008725883,0.0004012329,0.000025822603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009667759,0.000052232965,0.003340018,0.000003735045,0.000011551672,0.000016239577,0.0025017348,0.000004189927,0.000011158494,0.9902167,0.0035563793,0.00027643624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012228271,0.000056602672,0.023003677,0.000047037047,0.000017967655,0.00012275846,0.009343928,0.0004158865,0.00001607557,0.90771437,0.057733152,0.00030573743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043241045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010096305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59860474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025649322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026993093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5167009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26779528","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200006490","title":"Law, the State, and Evolutionary Theory: Introduction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Content (measure theory); State (computer science); Action (physics); Law and economics; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Sociology; Physics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.01765507773876737,"score_gpt":0.20585249817669668,"score_spread":0.1881974204379293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26779528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78042597,0.0051770364,0.0024496147,0.00393969,0.0017782188,0.00012526265,0.00008008135,0.000029094159,0.20599502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956298,0.0006394461,0.0001416612,0.00072649133,0.000950334,0.000003699979,0.0000037306559,0.000008528563,0.0018963084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928254,0.000039473423,0.0003335693,0.00015221027,0.000017002996,0.00017523348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952126,0.0000372061,0.00017953645,0.00017368235,0.000020610018,0.00006771759],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000685621,0.0000829101,0.00013997976,0.00005032683,0.0014581005,0.000058804177,0.00013125561,0.00003699182,0.00083904975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021033,0.00007102191,0.00006140592,0.000053794796,0.0005308323,0.0005281769,0.000034687262,0.00025851236,0.0005096625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016299002,0.0000199867,0.00043504644,0.0000016493614,0.000030272015,0.0000056603094,0.0005318474,0.00012322312,0.0000056016665,0.99394476,0.004735766,0.0001499047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017830427,0.000021292566,0.0030068238,0.0000019734064,0.000002679705,0.001145728,0.000049821505,0.000052628595,0.000014953811,0.6117303,0.383718,0.000077496974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000076383214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033293265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38221446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006290461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013021764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780698079","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200022483","title":"Opening the Ranks of Constitutional Subjects: Immigration, Identity, and Innovation in Italy and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Subjectivity; Identity (music); Political science; National identity; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.025786940089979612,"score_gpt":0.3309389715755926,"score_spread":0.305152031485613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780698079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764714,0.00013505995,0.00011440405,0.003218716,0.00022034808,0.00005576102,0.0000028002721,0.0000014168631,0.019780058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996031,0.00010132841,0.000019239953,0.00008403237,0.00012666147,7.581889e-7,8.1967323e-7,0.0000010188039,0.000063047104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942666,0.00004445763,0.00018186591,0.000048178048,0.00021943508,0.00007942428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955755,0.00003374765,0.00019965906,0.000052146966,0.00013089378,0.000025996913],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000985586,0.000031989923,0.000060225942,0.0000389462,0.0018060041,0.00029811944,0.00010707938,0.000024162788,0.000026088608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009181512,0.00002555669,0.000007618402,0.000060805396,0.0006137959,0.00069145876,0.00003126996,0.00010574026,1.3853446e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007473326,0.0000041129883,0.071703024,0.0000029096138,0.0000073709552,0.0000069893654,0.0027588913,0.0000018264229,0.00016771648,0.9235028,0.00017979996,0.0016571073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010203691,0.000025487807,0.85476834,0.00010486076,0.000021075688,0.00014655793,0.004298093,0.00007305082,0.00016205983,0.022521647,0.11671126,0.00014721772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69095856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95830244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9009811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040572697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027705508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920828632","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200020575","title":"The Strategic Constitution in Action: Canada's Afghan War as a Case Study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Empire; Political science; Enumerated powers; Foreign policy; Treaty; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Politics","score_opus":0.05969960859110246,"score_gpt":0.36989624540538607,"score_spread":0.3101966368142836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920828632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45875368,0.00056357327,0.00000776314,0.000091412825,0.002322121,0.00015726045,0.0000053354183,0.000011494266,0.53808737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98711956,0.000094724775,0.0000038464264,0.0001823257,0.0009884314,0.000005337432,4.827473e-7,0.000004363768,0.011600902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984404,0.0002752728,0.00024603042,0.0000852308,0.0003921679,0.0005609377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993033,0.000060293747,0.0001074016,0.00011564475,0.00008298221,0.0003304138],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011823035,0.00009470239,0.000101694946,0.000025928279,0.003494171,0.00020693944,0.00016581303,0.00004699039,0.00009553068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017644566,0.00007163403,0.00003736828,0.00011142184,0.00028625497,0.00020882647,0.000017255834,0.00031079407,0.000011076641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009571199,0.00008214493,0.00084894063,0.0000015947206,0.000017657883,0.0011399436,0.002750849,0.0000014993005,0.0000039210636,0.9945237,0.000032364434,0.0005878352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029723384,0.000037559497,0.00027770447,0.000010016072,0.000016882097,0.0020660094,0.1078296,0.000003922709,0.0000055092964,0.0022516805,0.8870914,0.000112469526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81975275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98821956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004117068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011493711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99780315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921763831","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200021714","title":"Brexit. Or, Is the European Union Educable?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Brexit; Parliament; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04728492007501286,"score_gpt":0.3569850001148792,"score_spread":0.3097000800398664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921763831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03685451,0.00027081592,0.0004892703,0.064773954,0.0008282712,0.000058682595,0.0000047731987,0.000019973684,0.8966997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97983783,0.0004700369,0.000026540858,0.0010802614,0.0015279617,9.750131e-7,1.4007496e-7,0.000005221141,0.017051028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882025,0.0005034706,0.00013239302,0.00007547526,0.0002888684,0.00017953715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951607,0.00011260979,0.00008224057,0.000073863856,0.00014751466,0.00006771693],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011594547,0.000059327624,0.00006449898,0.000016446173,0.0017687154,0.00012276489,0.00029696617,0.000012230852,0.0015233875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041133666,0.000025590587,0.00006054846,0.00006417616,0.0003658306,0.00025138436,0.00005261481,0.000096533506,0.00044901064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009965528,0.000030529867,0.0006850832,9.482306e-7,0.00005195276,0.000016111528,0.008558455,4.241542e-7,0.00013584041,0.8275632,0.14170665,0.021240799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001660181,0.000023929215,0.0051618298,0.000040879764,0.000005920051,0.00002286431,0.000714962,1.498998e-7,0.000071968185,0.02280838,0.97092605,0.00005706714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009814671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043787826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9429833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008821219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007506478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921825266","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200022859","title":"Taking More than They Give: MNE Tax Privateering and Apple's “Ocean” Income","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Base erosion and profit shifting; Subsidiary; Business; Multinational corporation; Tax haven; Tax avoidance; European union; Corporate tax; Double taxation; International trade; International economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.014603978906024058,"score_gpt":0.24764123374559305,"score_spread":0.233037254839569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921825266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98324114,0.00007312477,0.00063379307,0.0011773518,0.00043901673,0.000095310585,0.000002225027,0.00008198833,0.014256045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99486965,0.000013924806,0.00023446092,0.0012276099,0.0034066928,0.000001373874,0.0000051947336,0.000025489962,0.00021559496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990439,0.000009552669,0.0002577736,0.00017458627,0.0002322706,0.0002819288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906397,0.000012352856,0.00058561325,0.00014600078,0.00015996872,0.000032081876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035318063,0.00015848344,0.00015694511,0.00012435333,0.00075852824,0.00067345664,0.00021280024,0.00004504557,0.00034631847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031891723,0.00013526434,0.00004689579,0.00017018881,0.00011935581,0.0011315022,0.00018721224,0.00023434326,0.00013698264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031836116,0.00023440989,0.4516742,0.0006941797,0.00026752948,0.0005184064,0.0039182995,0.00019808895,0.01729844,0.4416263,0.018368425,0.06488334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022197491,0.000046755085,0.42250055,0.0005365949,0.00008860994,0.00041394564,0.0008691519,0.006073779,0.0007665241,0.027366811,0.5380988,0.0010186781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035207495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047814258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5197304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022338127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009246927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6494158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921835525","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200021763","title":"Safety Valves and Complete Exits in European Treaty Politics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; European union; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; International trade; Member states; Safeguard; Law; Political economy; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.03256380832389923,"score_gpt":0.30839861692638654,"score_spread":0.2758348086024873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921835525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24647762,0.00021553824,0.00009961545,0.004825733,0.00017192386,0.000047632166,0.00003361238,0.000024697263,0.7481036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99343204,0.0008930871,0.00008592784,0.0009285155,0.0006601185,1.4841528e-7,2.6549162e-7,0.000011034927,0.003988871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985637,0.0005846923,0.00021819408,0.000107354776,0.00019372834,0.00033230006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994483,0.000114869865,0.000110627996,0.000090080124,0.00003471142,0.00020141345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083327055,0.00007731925,0.00010417943,0.00003555042,0.00062272616,0.00007661945,0.00018359213,0.000022637894,0.000112338515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089972644,0.000054299704,0.000040831674,0.00006704341,0.00037846886,0.00025374553,0.000043572498,0.00013225991,0.00008688754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008751632,0.000015968079,0.002674923,0.0000019756037,0.0000060321195,0.000077197576,0.0039188396,2.7103863e-7,0.00013869606,0.9865925,0.00082716206,0.0057377387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006405763,0.00002395254,0.24294068,0.00009055382,0.000004242433,0.000053654152,0.00017734415,5.799818e-7,0.000020111482,0.0120118065,0.7439243,0.00011217554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009497942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031782528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97458065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070187125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003927536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4789569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921843199","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200019799","title":"Migration of European Judicial Ideas Concerning Jurisdiction Over Google on Withdrawal of Information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to be forgotten; Jurisdiction; Legitimacy; Political science; Order (exchange); Position (finance); Economic Justice; Phenomenon; European court of justice; European union; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; European Union law; Data Protection Act 1998; International trade","score_opus":0.012152119813946375,"score_gpt":0.2840514299627629,"score_spread":0.2718993101488165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921843199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81126297,0.000020602953,0.00397574,0.0006388756,0.00053650234,0.00008341726,0.000007603103,0.00002426091,0.18345001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991632,0.000044887307,0.000125802,0.00012623321,0.00044210008,5.490212e-7,0.0000027836097,0.0000041088065,0.000090313784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987458,0.00022900055,0.00037809522,0.000049326412,0.00048254442,0.00011523469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990672,0.00005778755,0.0005469995,0.00006969427,0.000186469,0.00007184924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000800333,0.000056242377,0.00009783272,0.00008965947,0.00032267923,0.00004104658,0.00010326256,0.000045668323,0.00027425683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010511582,0.000039797967,0.000059324553,0.00008521752,0.00018274905,0.0010490454,0.000012799348,0.0000828528,0.00005160673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005359962,0.00013470338,0.0063021816,0.00002799913,0.000050323604,0.000004723021,0.04138306,0.00015087852,0.03990017,0.801752,0.032469407,0.07728858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007028413,0.001198431,0.16701753,0.0019747752,0.000092540446,0.00003289525,0.0051609273,0.00046553678,0.025840385,0.033747546,0.7567862,0.00065479043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009170373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048402388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7680044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005872715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005340465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30029202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921907415","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017636","title":"Welfare Rights in Canadian and German Constitutional Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Individualism; Law; Political science; Politics; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Welfare rights; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Constitution","score_opus":0.04791757453907466,"score_gpt":0.32162531292933916,"score_spread":0.2737077383902645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921907415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045868058,0.00006825247,0.0000031616978,0.008762705,0.0003195446,0.0000485295,0.00001632193,0.00001187025,0.9449016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761516,0.00001013384,0.000068455614,0.0018223211,0.000409898,0.0000010508229,0.0000014667426,0.0000023073267,0.00006919552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988749,0.00013535372,0.00016629697,0.00009885779,0.00021434521,0.0005102553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990186,0.000033390123,0.00003376115,0.000060427803,0.0000603588,0.0007934718],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006276172,0.000072499795,0.000097842545,0.000063617365,0.0021005843,0.00007592386,0.00014781933,0.00013686875,0.0007300897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024100027,0.00006632447,0.00003379851,0.00006659268,0.002411897,0.00033364233,0.00001510546,0.00046409812,0.000048231155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035813448,0.0000128484135,0.00042310834,0.0000020534594,0.000005396458,0.00016870037,0.0040582996,1.1417826e-7,7.4390033e-7,0.99518144,0.00011269585,0.000030999585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011777414,0.000008273745,0.0024872017,0.00001336327,0.000004203168,0.000060895698,0.000081390586,0.0000012606816,0.000005094328,0.58450806,0.41263878,0.000073692005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7861136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9454142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9517471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016147691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028830566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921982759","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200023105","title":"Legal Harmonization Through Interfederal Cooperation: A Comparison of the Interfederal Harmonization of Law Through Uniform Law Conferences and Executive Intergovernmental Conferences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harmonization; Federalism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Transparency (behavior); Federal law; Public administration; Business; Legislation; Politics","score_opus":0.04158019726274978,"score_gpt":0.33664090307701766,"score_spread":0.2950607058142679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921982759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49309796,0.0003045315,0.01324008,0.0024510277,0.0017209589,0.00044152548,0.00009659423,0.0000285072,0.48861882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834245,0.000046120815,0.0002494623,0.00067970017,0.00043393302,0.0000033717197,0.0000048553825,0.000008662079,0.00023143974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979755,0.00030456687,0.00065726315,0.0001852576,0.0005792977,0.00029808408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860597,0.00007707632,0.0006232493,0.00011545895,0.00047747084,0.00010080565],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032590926,0.0001630881,0.00034160848,0.000011051163,0.0013466751,0.00039014293,0.0003494455,0.000110923684,0.00018798094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063088984,0.00011645016,0.00008036001,0.00011493814,0.0026785678,0.001230177,0.00012323335,0.00024346901,0.0000034171997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057437624,0.000070226524,0.002039707,0.000016787466,0.000047026235,8.818072e-7,0.023833275,0.0000021335513,0.00041284572,0.97295225,0.0004398256,0.00012758482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038254454,0.0023177385,0.0045647174,0.0022023118,0.00021852172,0.0001700789,0.058235284,0.001919135,0.16818735,0.11807379,0.63920563,0.0010800149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06263789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06988977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8548785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014251968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023118497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922373660","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017909","title":"Home State Regulation of Environmental Human Rights Harms As Transnational Private Regulatory Governance*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Transnational governance; Human rights; State (computer science); Political science; Regulatory state; International law; International human rights law; Law and economics; Business; Public administration; Law; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.010051309370955146,"score_gpt":0.20964558488057974,"score_spread":0.1995942755096246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922373660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99125975,0.00008101156,0.00004821804,0.00016738396,0.00044338574,0.00011859322,0.000011772896,0.000031559513,0.0078383405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997226,0.0000024417454,0.00006048654,0.00016157908,0.0016191746,0.0000024523024,0.00005258395,0.000025045585,0.0008502481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984335,0.000017174842,0.00047218887,0.0001509639,0.00058913894,0.00033706453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911255,0.0000096552885,0.00060629385,0.0001785791,0.000047016347,0.00004589708],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034442742,0.00018751399,0.00020821931,0.00009552466,0.00078084564,0.00014609471,0.00021544794,0.00005840232,0.003592731],"category_scores_gemma":[4.942584e-7,0.00015774362,0.00013230115,0.00007649935,0.00016745055,0.0025346158,0.000048448466,0.00020129661,0.00016344698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038265625,0.000146982,0.0028498871,0.000028945722,0.000040374573,0.0000076910555,0.00012127774,0.00001896861,0.008027728,0.9878829,0.000554433,0.00028253518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008240241,0.000014145655,0.46265116,0.000025860045,0.000047756024,0.000038329512,0.0000056732456,0.000031409363,0.0012482436,0.42391768,0.110956624,0.00023907212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048541846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001231408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5639652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000816123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007502956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99731815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922521801","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001802","title":"The Delicate Equilibrium of EU Trade Measures: The Seals Case","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Indigenous; Seal (emblem); Parliament; Arctic; The arctic; International trade; Consumption (sociology); Business; Economy; Political science; Geography; Environmental protection; Economics; Law; Archaeology; Ecology; Sociology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.04162140591475037,"score_gpt":0.3362956676268271,"score_spread":0.2946742617120767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922521801","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14553335,0.0031495807,0.000069353126,0.56959575,0.0006031679,0.00045416888,0.00000789123,0.000040624942,0.2805461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966109,0.00047293416,0.00002887665,0.0012413323,0.00090576534,0.000007244096,6.157871e-8,0.000006872074,0.0007260324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985526,0.0003728566,0.00026152702,0.00007022008,0.00036574347,0.00037701803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913865,0.00031361615,0.0001787483,0.00015645662,0.00007786245,0.00013464702],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012272951,0.00007817725,0.00011766411,0.000013142867,0.003444066,0.00014574498,0.0003640584,0.00004111995,0.000083377636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084778905,0.000035774916,0.00011246971,0.00010024616,0.0011666993,0.00016670306,0.000053982298,0.00023834902,0.000044183038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019100235,0.000051789728,0.00033241423,0.000011236632,0.00030259276,0.00014851178,0.11139347,0.000008390921,0.00027537643,0.44311523,0.4128095,0.03153238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001933532,0.000032351847,0.0021741842,0.000017900908,0.00004613771,0.00090620574,0.023932092,0.000019352196,0.000088573914,0.028745484,0.94372964,0.0001147226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0089130495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044306326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85107756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003229163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076641685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99785334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941308389","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.9","title":"Populist leaders and political parties","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Politics; Elite; Political science; Democracy; State (computer science); Political economy; Virtue; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.038653414460385796,"score_gpt":0.37087236651537697,"score_spread":0.3322189520549912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941308389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65763015,0.00021477645,0.0000010213449,0.017302956,0.00031468453,0.000033392567,0.000001769381,0.000018947003,0.3244823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99265873,0.000032422293,0.00002902242,0.0017281369,0.0010080199,4.048731e-7,3.5491405e-7,0.0000042567,0.0045386744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991743,0.00009062103,0.000102108184,0.00006478184,0.00019790087,0.0003702958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960667,0.000036795045,0.000029031273,0.000049207716,0.000027546726,0.00025074644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002514853,0.00005209242,0.00008901067,0.000019951278,0.00053644564,0.00018428813,0.000095275194,0.000046900575,0.00049386744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020225465,0.0000420723,0.000035499415,0.00003588557,0.00043016937,0.00025839906,0.00001690452,0.00016958626,0.00025357286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040120635,0.000006215917,0.005471666,0.0000040422356,0.0000062846943,0.0000066350626,0.013311935,1.3138299e-7,0.00002396346,0.97815627,0.0027285018,0.0002803187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016777676,0.000032867956,0.0026188013,0.000014830596,0.000007784262,0.000042832864,0.009597785,0.000002076945,0.00006410452,0.03655982,0.95079577,0.00009554917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008545064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022441407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94806725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002987835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003723426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982294728","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.74","title":"A Tale of Two (Diverse) Countries: Religious Diversity in Canada and Singapore","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Secularism; Freedom of religion; Constitution; Diversity (politics); Political science; Religious freedom; Religious diversity; Charter; Sociology; Liberalism; Ethnic group; Cultural diversity; Minority rights; Law; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Human rights; Ethnology; Economic freedom; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012225705339405405,"score_gpt":0.26701008077356947,"score_spread":0.25478437543416405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982294728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94225407,0.00022289301,0.000004406865,0.00020030582,0.00027789403,0.000067260924,0.0000068108257,0.0000035567018,0.05696282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992155,0.00044036782,0.000021989317,0.0001622679,0.000056376317,1.5774702e-7,9.096228e-7,0.0000023211383,0.0001001223],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920136,0.000059725517,0.00013713381,0.00007562746,0.00035850727,0.00016763828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996256,0.000041964853,0.00011334703,0.000054685694,0.00008505874,0.00007933692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000328664,0.000048582453,0.000110498986,0.00003922123,0.00037567236,0.00003397631,0.00012036552,0.000028029597,0.00006879613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014422023,0.000047136582,0.00002247809,0.00007395404,0.00013690234,0.00017454934,0.00006122067,0.000100367266,0.0000042409765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050884155,0.000029299094,0.77999747,0.000035477933,0.00002042431,0.00014661282,0.046318673,0.00006720913,0.00006463852,0.15870664,0.013160574,0.0014020914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014252811,0.00044540662,0.38107908,0.00069226295,0.00022425695,0.00035740584,0.17432489,0.00037209017,0.00057005085,0.340516,0.08554735,0.0016184129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99661034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3989184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029235534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046349794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2889406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982351217","doi":"10.1017/glj.2019.77","title":"Solidarity in Diversity? State Responses to Religious Diversity in Liberal and Non-Liberal Perspectives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; National University of Singapore","keywords":"Solidarity; Diversity (politics); Political science; Secularism; State (computer science); Sociology; Liberal democracy; Liberalism; Environmental ethics; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.01665888651955795,"score_gpt":0.29817363911422906,"score_spread":0.2815147525946711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982351217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588802,0.00014590008,0.000011770684,0.0014225339,0.00022895762,0.0002046446,0.0000058278288,0.000015949996,0.039084245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980921,0.00046069646,0.00008328501,0.00028421325,0.00009067072,8.7027274e-7,6.4466553e-7,0.000005342636,0.0009821897],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985722,0.0002596174,0.000174841,0.00021558073,0.00040307935,0.00037469686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994604,0.00007744743,0.0000754225,0.00009222801,0.00009188045,0.00020263183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009349527,0.00010347574,0.00018044228,0.00023407242,0.0010383864,0.00016427368,0.00024882331,0.0000745008,0.000034804056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055143402,0.0001063042,0.000052179937,0.00022251804,0.00018722484,0.000568448,0.00050386746,0.0002944079,0.000031837455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042733416,0.00009570728,0.6411155,0.000007969581,0.0000107477845,0.00016475221,0.34374812,0.0000422411,0.000067592235,0.01026803,0.0035157844,0.00053625833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016653612,0.00016780992,0.8752644,0.000061504456,0.000011064731,0.00002266026,0.018139334,0.00003144408,0.000020423178,0.10391812,0.0004204141,0.000277441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041578792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057702493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3256088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003043371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008128275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9648034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005751002","doi":"10.1017/glj.2020.10","title":"Does Investor-State Dispute Settlement Discriminate Against Nationals?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Ratification; Constitutional court; Political science; European union; Law; Investor-state dispute settlement; German; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Law and economics; Business; Economics; Constitution; Foreign direct investment; International trade; Politics; International investment; History","score_opus":0.020170245623566257,"score_gpt":0.24145434400666116,"score_spread":0.2212840983830949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005751002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23957998,0.00008575192,0.0017468699,0.1418234,0.0033114706,0.0004541894,0.00007058076,0.0002797012,0.61264807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7961957,0.000018584615,0.00025002845,0.2001185,0.0028429837,0.0000075473754,0.000119169774,0.000023380382,0.0004241272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860907,0.000016670467,0.0004016106,0.00019724533,0.00052709394,0.0002483161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993123,0.000013550257,0.00030101655,0.0000837591,0.00022906913,0.000060309834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022484003,0.00017299812,0.00013888991,0.00008763258,0.00049343065,0.00073776854,0.0002855706,0.000027944589,0.00088635006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033549186,0.000112509035,0.000116904164,0.00013850872,0.000081888546,0.0019426317,0.00011196649,0.00023817457,0.0007480581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002954203,0.000056411664,0.0005223573,0.000044685337,0.00006303429,0.000049847746,0.00022547775,0.00013720086,0.0010045032,0.961615,0.035682388,0.0005695047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006749784,0.00001398725,0.00203534,0.00003763495,0.000027196278,0.0000061926726,0.000096907046,0.005529099,0.00046768188,0.043585707,0.9472618,0.00026344368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045921905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009336431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91802937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051632753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021658567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9704912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082112013","doi":"10.1017/glj.2020.50","title":"The Conceptualization of Constitutional Supremacy: Global Discourse and Legal Tradition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Law; Constitution; Political science; Doctrine; White supremacy; Supremacy Clause; Constitutional law; Sociology; Statute; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.03277042819051123,"score_gpt":0.3293126719201979,"score_spread":0.2965422437296867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082112013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41510728,0.007124656,0.0132821305,0.106793396,0.0017913515,0.0004236202,0.00022190559,0.00007542914,0.45518023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857455,0.0002822226,0.00002893923,0.00046425557,0.00063763605,0.0000011713068,0.0000026375053,9.2100095e-7,0.000007668111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924093,0.00009511719,0.00016481255,0.00006541226,0.00031316836,0.00012055699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961376,0.000052882457,0.00009392595,0.000020669517,0.00011204708,0.00010671577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021937836,0.000049630948,0.00008250684,0.0000044773433,0.0021337492,0.000086945256,0.000088894536,0.000025371071,0.000040025458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080556245,0.000035679215,0.000041305382,0.00009203628,0.0045849094,0.00024543452,0.0000183414,0.00007952319,0.0000043202735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018799423,0.000008325648,0.0010251825,0.0000011048057,0.000021637237,0.00000559211,0.0011436233,0.00000962079,0.000019685533,0.9959012,0.0009135501,0.0009316805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010991873,0.00013571729,0.012429488,0.000067379544,0.00011153305,0.00017497786,0.024429515,0.00009998057,0.00006602001,0.31947675,0.6416376,0.00027184337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007066858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009480819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67642444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003854427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022935087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121944165","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001504","title":"The Five Lessons I Learned Through Clinical Education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Indictment; Casebook; Churning; Legal education; Curriculum; Legal profession; Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.15597166387903746,"score_gpt":0.5538591762690033,"score_spread":0.3978875123899658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121944165","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008784539,0.0001952895,0.0000919074,0.5547348,0.0022212863,0.00006734968,6.185388e-7,0.000022415317,0.43388176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683637,0.0012639248,0.0008481932,0.014459586,0.0025546378,0.0000029919936,0.0000026437338,0.0000045220095,0.012499773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861974,0.00048936007,0.00031598032,0.000091717106,0.00027238356,0.000210797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875575,0.00040234718,0.00025209642,0.00014043594,0.0003407856,0.00010858782],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020883067,0.000053273303,0.00006886057,0.000018296812,0.0040687406,0.0007136794,0.00026810117,0.00007010592,0.00029494197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008442444,0.00003896316,0.00007333144,0.00024499136,0.0002456223,0.0009511575,0.000008061377,0.0008449867,0.00020170986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060026646,0.00008980981,0.000038250975,1.6589425e-7,0.000006428019,5.4448583e-7,0.007447833,6.3812297e-7,0.0000026184293,0.7964729,0.10138564,0.09454916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007298566,0.000021353993,0.002572805,0.0000052978817,0.000009029543,0.00001220478,0.0071901283,0.0000016824456,0.0000024452188,0.16501157,0.82505304,0.00004747579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001417944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017278042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95957917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007265527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016009017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99722785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122466507","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001425","title":"The Association of Transnational Law Schools' Agora: An Experiment in Graduate Legal Pedagogy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Agora; Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Legal education; Political science; Law; Legal realism; Legal profession; Scholarship; Comparative law; Sociology","score_opus":0.049977915924158775,"score_gpt":0.407106661106963,"score_spread":0.3571287451828042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122466507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8292401,0.00040078128,0.00006739004,0.037427813,0.00048845797,0.00013349843,0.0000065069457,0.000013815169,0.13222165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884367,0.00010055578,0.0000739791,0.00030801527,0.00027711366,0.00000342762,0.0000022406425,0.0000025028114,0.00038849816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847186,0.00026631638,0.00029803874,0.00008391436,0.00067556754,0.00020432519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930644,0.0000958094,0.00017952806,0.000050032642,0.00030885744,0.000059336446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011018052,0.00006746031,0.00011987962,0.000033082764,0.0010390022,0.00014917225,0.0002071495,0.000033668395,0.00004319894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030176478,0.000051880845,0.00007240192,0.000086991546,0.00011146246,0.0005235236,0.000008300292,0.00023374065,0.0000045877455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023817465,0.00008083343,0.00037853463,2.8852693e-7,0.000020853158,0.0000027960118,0.0050229193,0.000024779973,0.00021034988,0.99295455,0.00069066865,0.00058958115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011218159,0.00031117658,0.07744685,0.000022812133,0.000018604316,0.000010219528,0.009527665,0.00010617348,0.0013513676,0.14978135,0.7600735,0.00022848905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014286123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03647978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84317327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002593915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009900703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98110193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122651965","doi":"10.1017/glj.2020.31","title":"A Topographical Approach to Accountability for Human Rights Violations in Migration Control","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Human rights; Law and economics; Control (management); Political science; Business; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03095379386496562,"score_gpt":0.3434790713382644,"score_spread":0.3125252774732988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122651965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9166374,0.000032538162,0.06444356,0.0058744927,0.00016577044,0.00093398086,0.000020540017,0.000047811653,0.011843902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972442,0.0000032102735,0.0008440718,0.0008895221,0.00090726407,0.000051520863,0.000022740376,0.0000054963384,0.000031991596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987153,0.00021935934,0.00036769378,0.00018288882,0.0002866652,0.00022808301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993237,0.000060553808,0.00009815191,0.00007655684,0.00021988749,0.00022114778],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007955248,0.00009013695,0.00015557549,0.00007774455,0.0014420112,0.00021782986,0.00016430432,0.000102124715,0.000081226324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008524035,0.000077062694,0.00011393889,0.00028840028,0.000086780296,0.00048235536,0.0000056732347,0.00020962197,0.000007889715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008228439,0.00018033569,0.0063192807,0.000009546823,0.000017137963,5.4286824e-7,0.0535416,0.00011627968,0.0010005779,0.93401307,0.0042964634,0.00042287222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024263174,0.00041608396,0.035101328,0.00003788748,0.00006241929,0.0000068669146,0.00416858,0.0065136477,0.00019962869,0.11657954,0.8339857,0.00050200854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038774982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17952915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8296892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009900317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053632808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123100070","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001401","title":"<i>Born to be Wild:</i> The “Trans-systemic” Programme at McGill and the De-Nationalization of Legal Education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Jurisdiction; Vocational education; Legal practice; Political science; Legal profession; Law; Legal research; Legal realism; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02797268398985395,"score_gpt":0.3369369060915065,"score_spread":0.30896422210165253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123100070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57460755,0.0024537193,0.0015904788,0.2180567,0.00071507273,0.0009977554,0.000023287455,0.000030837145,0.2015246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949314,0.00022117731,0.00008549457,0.0037412692,0.0003028516,0.000011115313,0.0000022923707,0.0000024771232,0.00070190855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903345,0.00022441059,0.00019607697,0.000069801215,0.00034149588,0.00013479135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993202,0.00011856257,0.00012576325,0.000052841155,0.00032556526,0.00005706456],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009086044,0.000056934467,0.00009104734,0.000022697797,0.0014390252,0.00008019999,0.00014083667,0.000020788535,0.000028526778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000660359,0.000033350418,0.000050332725,0.00011343396,0.00024147499,0.00017380435,0.000016364544,0.00008047189,0.0000022097975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034409877,0.000031023057,0.00018639924,0.000001693358,0.000019453379,2.6356287e-7,0.008713555,0.000024644072,0.000102919366,0.9829549,0.0042759334,0.00365477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003089598,0.000041479223,0.003891781,0.000029461768,0.000022214941,0.000068339534,0.0020094018,0.00004441333,0.00011488025,0.013824,0.97958505,0.00005999221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009033039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048482604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97530913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001094042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007527434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124307502","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200006167","title":"The ECJ, Volkswagen and European Corporate Law: Reshaping the European Varieties of Capitalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Member state; Political science; Law; Treaty; European court of justice; Commission; Economic Justice; Statute; State (computer science); European union; European Union law; Business; Member states; International trade","score_opus":0.022215517513478528,"score_gpt":0.2124983963075694,"score_spread":0.19028287879409087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124307502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46893153,0.0015785936,0.00021934258,0.0014593004,0.0006056006,0.00012245218,0.0000023857267,0.000041389994,0.5270394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99420726,0.00011208889,0.000020554247,0.0028012374,0.0022013253,3.6423674e-7,0.0000031507877,0.00003633793,0.00061765476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866205,0.00009449702,0.00044584885,0.00014245472,0.0003221422,0.00033299503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848855,0.00006691593,0.0009592189,0.00025829097,0.00020151766,0.000025510986],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040416038,0.00016110296,0.00014056772,0.000031924457,0.0024214468,0.0013914066,0.00044688716,0.000022237766,0.00002842962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027423328,0.00009359872,0.000080439466,0.0001566108,0.000499378,0.0006933221,0.00027155664,0.00032315642,0.0000980357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005807708,0.000021208221,0.0010954894,0.00003500427,0.000060132672,0.00028433633,0.0004522762,0.000013075032,0.0010264963,0.9685642,0.01696973,0.011419982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005247484,0.00001859246,0.03628141,0.00008698068,0.00007262525,0.00013666997,0.00080558844,0.000060178474,0.00012949943,0.044950377,0.9166939,0.00023940923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008854361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002300968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92361385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013354071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009185274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125481302","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001383","title":"“Transnational Law” as Proto-Concept: Three Conceptions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Political science; Law; Public law; Comparative law; Municipal law; International law; Term (time); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02048432206843382,"score_gpt":0.34116796321686693,"score_spread":0.3206836411484331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125481302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067329034,0.0001603349,0.0015784436,0.063669935,0.00068229414,0.0005483313,0.000012827249,0.00013738153,0.86588144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958726,0.00001704581,0.0002077558,0.0020471758,0.0011347715,0.000008654198,0.000005218212,0.000006104151,0.0007006837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986346,0.000091942726,0.00024895545,0.00013034126,0.0005796922,0.00031447443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993522,0.000032967473,0.000110278364,0.00009254719,0.00018786172,0.00022410088],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047819826,0.00009562261,0.00011564662,0.000038363116,0.002271311,0.00027296235,0.00021648454,0.000096470416,0.0026910757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011040169,0.00009156801,0.00012628951,0.00012185824,0.00036663367,0.0005608324,0.0000074482705,0.00030982777,0.00006477417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108062995,0.000046734396,0.000047667796,5.525497e-7,0.000010477395,0.000012683906,0.004586793,0.0000068498566,0.00019839994,0.98952585,0.0004899813,0.005063215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043969162,0.00010855626,0.0037923618,0.000009654541,0.000015157628,0.00006230136,0.00036895048,0.000007865855,0.00010432194,0.14233227,0.85262895,0.00012990675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006336476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051367325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92854357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009729767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001782428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125688624","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001140","title":"Law's Knowledge and Law's Effectiveness: Reflections from Legal Sociology and Legal Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Nagging; Institutionalisation; Bureaucracy; Rationalization (economics); Law; Sociology; Parallels; Political science; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025207395803524567,"score_gpt":0.35074309936203935,"score_spread":0.3255357035585148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125688624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38490194,0.008043779,0.00022244947,0.002718222,0.0007026831,0.00011089021,0.0000134254315,0.000052583284,0.60323405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714935,0.0004010751,0.000057731337,0.0009841591,0.0012979512,0.0000032303187,0.0000014906759,0.0000036787783,0.00010132746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987446,0.00054059457,0.00014847293,0.00016591357,0.00013476721,0.00026565578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935377,0.00031008018,0.0000604674,0.000046681125,0.00009254782,0.00013647269],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007478977,0.000108332104,0.00019734656,0.000025078294,0.00416773,0.00014986818,0.0000922526,0.00010287921,0.000051135343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035091554,0.00009268476,0.00005953068,0.00005884055,0.0022255024,0.00037415113,0.00003830118,0.0003166136,0.000016380865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044216264,0.000037782836,0.00016148546,0.0000011210062,0.0000499612,0.000026837155,0.0025093907,4.1208267e-7,0.0002945,0.9944996,0.00012235327,0.0022523096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030896076,0.00008407829,0.013040931,0.000027246633,0.000041724208,0.000070346425,0.00091855024,5.5815883e-7,0.00003898566,0.7074616,0.2778901,0.0001169567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012448948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03194363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6122474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007396327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008708969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126007499","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200000870","title":"The Case of<i>Laval</i>in the Context of the Post-Enlargement EC Law Development","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resizing; Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Directive; Political science; Law; Field (mathematics); European union; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; International trade; Computer science; Geology","score_opus":0.01921711681127998,"score_gpt":0.28800356506788155,"score_spread":0.2687864482566016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126007499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96460223,0.0003404522,0.0000046710734,0.00558929,0.00040044147,0.00022942653,0.000008913648,0.0000034728787,0.028821122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968181,0.00020430429,0.00003425156,0.002524576,0.00009842641,0.000004587099,4.2029853e-7,0.0000042636175,0.00031103683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853927,0.00036469297,0.00035296977,0.00006653889,0.00042351376,0.00025300984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992416,0.00013638857,0.00021659807,0.00018448847,0.00017022094,0.000050726358],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016117721,0.000070982875,0.000100809164,0.000014945922,0.00309513,0.000052301,0.0005046474,0.000030833617,0.00006751596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030880004,0.000031452717,0.00008625482,0.0001506922,0.0005631737,0.000101668185,0.000062085324,0.000207186,0.0000017941201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085045085,0.00009658538,0.0008393633,0.0000014827913,0.0000358285,0.00013642039,0.05466178,0.0000022230083,0.0000926423,0.93877673,0.0019177006,0.0034307085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044120633,0.000032322976,0.021864183,0.000026003878,0.00001586409,0.00027932797,0.026304422,0.0000014121727,0.00088656537,0.0015947154,0.9484743,0.00007966851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014890469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17245641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9465566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057984995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020780315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199691955","doi":"10.1017/glj.2021.59","title":"The Protection of Human Rights in Pandemics—Reflections on the Past, Present, and Future","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Uniwersytet Warszawski; Queen's University; European University Institute; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Politics; Public health; International human rights law; Right to health; Fundamental rights; State (computer science); Pandemic; Law; Public administration; Law and economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Disease; Medicine","score_opus":0.0467327509093018,"score_gpt":0.34538677155647834,"score_spread":0.29865402064717655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199691955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83179486,0.00017844132,0.00002184887,0.027708026,0.00058638497,0.00025234726,0.0000011441074,0.000013136394,0.13944383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964207,0.00007644114,0.000016873162,0.00008400088,0.0019028203,0.0000082744555,3.2329658e-7,0.0000026639636,0.0014879337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990843,0.00028670658,0.00016706344,0.00007531867,0.00023480656,0.0001518176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996513,0.000057250098,0.00008551177,0.00007900884,0.00007978841,0.00004714554],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006585636,0.000049548325,0.00006428452,0.000024201863,0.004058987,0.0001394811,0.000099078716,0.000044750766,0.00008333823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000036188706,0.000023569968,0.000032004755,0.00011597454,0.0001923004,0.0000740969,0.000018632016,0.0002992224,0.0000021481112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007247503,0.000035965808,0.000116089665,0.000002070975,0.000017656701,0.000010952795,0.011464088,0.0000014124284,0.00020914376,0.98397166,0.0023905197,0.0017731801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001281036,0.00002329273,0.0047968933,0.000018127012,0.0000040055925,0.000020064068,0.0016485192,0.0000017635346,0.00026808007,0.11384075,0.8792058,0.00004456432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000872367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033978973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8768153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049057468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005008941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W36033888","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200005459","title":"The Introduction of Real Estate Investment Trusts [REITs] in Germany","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Real estate and construction management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Real estate investment trust; Parliament; German; Legislator; German government; Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Business; Real estate; Political science; Accounting; Finance; Law; Politics; Legislation","score_opus":0.005004905703729685,"score_gpt":0.22832137675504954,"score_spread":0.22331647105131985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W36033888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8970762,0.00008197975,0.000535277,0.00023280631,0.0008808106,0.000095807016,8.774782e-7,0.000040008203,0.10105627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99551064,0.0036084454,0.0002479248,0.000038931335,0.00047631018,0.0000023900927,0.0000016102538,0.000014851699,0.00009892438],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990592,0.000026687661,0.00040949642,0.00007165595,0.00018503398,0.00024789965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996613,0.000021201438,0.000078293306,0.00013665846,0.000034086912,0.000068404435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006406862,0.000088791625,0.00010140993,0.00009509509,0.00012264834,0.00004008625,0.00011206603,0.000030195139,0.0000239282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000031544137,0.00006841446,0.00004332033,0.0001412501,0.000075992735,0.00015746625,0.000017621735,0.00023316013,0.000011653047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012801781,0.000059179532,0.001013271,0.00009126788,0.00019506781,0.00020374886,0.0024418167,0.026221901,0.0076782024,0.15377627,0.007560875,0.8006304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016548742,0.00014716909,0.12065411,0.00005374443,0.0000546654,0.0006785505,0.0021552085,0.004142213,0.0073268404,0.01085291,0.85181516,0.00046452446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012399156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058933476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8442543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099479505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000802825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2789861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210963208","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001462","title":"Sustainable Professionalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Practice of law; Legal profession; Skepticism; Legal education; Professional responsibility; Politics; Political science; Accountability; Law; Legal practice; Suspect; Work (physics); Public interest; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.043088990300738116,"score_gpt":0.43891631556246835,"score_spread":0.39582732526173026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210963208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018931098,0.00010764932,0.000065156,0.25139922,0.00061382586,0.00007476636,3.2524395e-7,0.00003418431,0.7287738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493328,0.000020602392,0.00028048438,0.007820642,0.0007580517,0.0000013462054,0.0000014088171,0.0000025217441,0.04178215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914354,0.00015096835,0.00013875449,0.000053939923,0.0002680034,0.00024480157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993435,0.000050098526,0.00010271182,0.00006383453,0.00034429642,0.00009552151],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009991467,0.000039444283,0.000046945945,0.00004839495,0.0024172869,0.00036468753,0.00014091481,0.000044694087,0.0017948205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001995484,0.00003477828,0.000029347268,0.0002545692,0.00006796125,0.0012026872,0.0000064978917,0.00047006557,0.00010949464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031334775,0.000043453532,0.000019670519,6.348341e-7,0.000002347822,0.000012294776,0.010660228,4.7821345e-7,0.000017047549,0.9309868,0.05580388,0.0024500168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007707824,0.000010219045,0.0008935544,0.000004660406,0.0000032551109,0.000020843669,0.009683033,6.0563906e-7,0.000010806737,0.13054587,0.8587045,0.000045576486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015927339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019065505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9304017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009285209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063345925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297394486","doi":"10.1017/glj.2022.66","title":"Legal Scholars Engaging with Social Anthropology: Hardships and Gains","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Toolbox; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Variety (cybernetics); German; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.055706670600195594,"score_gpt":0.3830768190405119,"score_spread":0.3273701484403163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297394486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86592495,0.00057751936,0.00007833023,0.013747105,0.00043101568,0.000065211265,0.0000125342,0.000025003388,0.11913833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794346,0.0000639175,0.00006521746,0.0008397184,0.00057757547,0.0000053651047,0.0000012391012,0.0000053759445,0.0004981155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988246,0.00033985457,0.00011256087,0.00010429628,0.0004034315,0.00021525558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996785,0.000052055122,0.000085665786,0.000028557442,0.000091687456,0.0000635639],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007007886,0.0000662419,0.00011165339,0.000041021678,0.010415637,0.00018434417,0.00014608687,0.000014592424,0.000730003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016955151,0.000058528094,0.000036839723,0.000085172614,0.0006542066,0.0003536645,0.0000989754,0.00054013304,0.000005008739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039877024,0.00003554041,0.0031646253,0.0000011080591,0.00007580009,0.000071906914,0.02829062,0.0000054724237,0.000048308986,0.9611978,0.006112741,0.0009562158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002901519,0.00007816753,0.0045542708,0.0000037383627,0.000012443847,0.00011513742,0.022297818,0.000006376038,0.00001502002,0.0022004838,0.9703339,0.000092527654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013551479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033190418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012635469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008425885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382133561","doi":"10.1017/glj.2023.42","title":"Kahn in Luxembourg: A Prolegomena to the Cultural Study of EU Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam","keywords":"Political science; Law; European union; Skepticism; Politics; Comparative law; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Common law; Identity (music); Sociology; Geography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04444019664918444,"score_gpt":0.370220337445611,"score_spread":0.3257801407964266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382133561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6700699,0.00002891233,3.9454113e-7,0.004545354,0.00026522612,0.00015334522,0.0000021067485,0.000017339276,0.32491744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972289,0.000041479056,0.000011608899,0.00072640495,0.00039149902,0.0000044989342,4.1493965e-7,0.0000057356624,0.0015894325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878156,0.0002398148,0.00022553188,0.00008693618,0.00045028087,0.00021589837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995968,0.000050474926,0.00007485835,0.00007178593,0.00014151618,0.00006456871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010063257,0.000060669652,0.000107854146,0.000045339577,0.000715787,0.00010633676,0.00033210244,0.000013307196,0.00006644119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057702742,0.00003765124,0.00004394575,0.0002965087,0.00014022607,0.00017671006,0.00008716671,0.00016652819,0.00019544366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002761304,0.00015383035,0.0016271109,0.000003170765,0.000058749716,0.000064439104,0.11873396,0.00005538694,0.00009672032,0.8588944,0.019971017,0.00031362355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049566675,0.00020642158,0.03081774,0.000040872575,0.00001023474,0.000008100972,0.053475354,0.000009922801,0.000029744851,0.0018961622,0.91290045,0.00010935247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002826021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036216427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89292943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046825895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018411874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382137424","doi":"10.1017/glj.2023.38","title":"Political Theory and the Volunteer: Lessons from Kahn’s Ethnography of ‘Our Unhappy Politics’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Happiness; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Law; Framing (construction); Ethnography; Democracy; Political science; Aesthetics; Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.043637902759754876,"score_gpt":0.3923505951086683,"score_spread":0.34871269234891344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382137424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46822336,0.0008044954,0.00037845087,0.14370973,0.0012632117,0.00025599662,0.00023198407,0.00014296101,0.3849898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969868,0.0000811857,0.00004259472,0.0011834382,0.0015512294,0.0000026298767,0.000002913943,0.000011059619,0.0001381211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972289,0.0014431746,0.0002783274,0.00013085973,0.00038759626,0.0005311153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997562,0.0017643397,0.00006816647,0.0001623986,0.00010244756,0.00034065335],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003366792,0.000104274266,0.00022615322,0.00007795605,0.0013296966,0.00012941154,0.00032388006,0.00010681414,0.00014931738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004281115,0.000072707735,0.00019913462,0.0002567606,0.0023381745,0.00014954401,0.0000776763,0.0004516547,0.000046559788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000700105,0.00002179718,0.00008896092,0.000005111928,0.00005058226,0.000016070955,0.007141721,1.474397e-7,0.000042333646,0.99178034,0.0004934134,0.0002895237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050014275,0.000018730156,0.00040867252,0.000031690084,0.000054030366,0.000011367335,0.013115723,0.0000058919527,0.0000931011,0.9637041,0.02196657,0.000089987116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009807573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009776429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5287635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020347363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047830574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393126564","doi":"10.1017/glj.2023.87","title":"Civil Society as an Informal Institution in Ukraine’s Judicial Reform Process","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial reform; Ukrainian; Civil society; Political science; Institution; Politics; Law; Rule of law; Public administration","score_opus":0.027265187749228086,"score_gpt":0.3514104389606093,"score_spread":0.3241452512113812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393126564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49422264,0.000023890154,0.000003524197,0.00079150434,0.00036194018,0.00004715051,0.0000024700557,0.000052914584,0.50449395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99658793,0.00046001622,0.000019646886,0.0008497277,0.0011931951,0.0000033433105,0.0000074530085,0.0000069519842,0.0008717583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987525,0.000060595296,0.00025605859,0.00009996964,0.0005101518,0.00032077372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995632,0.0000140590555,0.00010021529,0.00005264806,0.00015646587,0.000113391965],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011063914,0.00008014062,0.00010108342,0.00006460662,0.0013207663,0.00014303716,0.00025177404,0.000051825646,0.00013455973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005953161,0.00006974555,0.00007622743,0.00030162933,0.0002922851,0.0011549173,0.000046289457,0.0002881092,0.00024262292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032970707,0.00004934279,0.0013072437,0.000009337165,0.000027644332,0.0000623418,0.060530875,0.000055372413,0.000019673831,0.9331787,0.0020655033,0.0026609905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008565237,0.0001458582,0.038656145,0.00009914432,0.000010196567,0.000050936225,0.017093882,0.00025925363,0.00004240093,0.016532864,0.9259693,0.00028349532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028400477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033157695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9239038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016006503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017515627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402609061","doi":"10.1017/glj.2024.25","title":"Forms of Law for the Anthropocene: Civil Liability Revisited","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Anthropocene; Political science; Legal liability; Law; Liability; Philosophy; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.021505376871097017,"score_gpt":0.3598379724245598,"score_spread":0.3383325955534628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402609061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09418866,0.008795427,0.00093536964,0.019812327,0.0015164282,0.0007437977,0.00016659587,0.000088768786,0.87375265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99757737,0.0005628474,0.00006715694,0.0006285357,0.00074041187,0.0000044754565,0.0000020870941,0.000008789179,0.0004083325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914914,0.000079859165,0.00020814991,0.00009184269,0.00023735684,0.00023366304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947524,0.00022936847,0.000059799127,0.0001240005,0.00002365391,0.00008791392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001097615,0.00006679115,0.00010682544,0.000012993583,0.0010812008,0.00012499477,0.00021586414,0.000054235043,0.0006657215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020219717,0.000040727587,0.0001600311,0.00006939242,0.0007951049,0.00024168659,0.000026769301,0.0001699819,0.000023921504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076218494,0.000019143648,0.000083508654,0.000032949454,0.000025323834,0.0000021718924,0.0019384094,0.000002160455,0.00007841789,0.9913587,0.002602673,0.003848941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009346125,0.000040258175,0.00033888433,0.00004841903,0.000031044903,0.000011062276,0.00015734874,0.000020339869,0.00036157065,0.07320966,0.92562675,0.000061212486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011023863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017406062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92302406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007205179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042027197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8315832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407986013","doi":"10.1017/glj.2024.80","title":"The “Hairs of Hope”: Toward a Fuller Understanding of the Legal, Material, and Social Infrastructure of Infrastructure","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.016940747615069033,"score_gpt":0.28139769687420724,"score_spread":0.2644569492591382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407986013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9483831,0.002518961,0.000112636335,0.014438308,0.0036675904,0.0003053036,0.00013318265,0.000032951924,0.030407969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854946,0.00058688765,0.000056562676,0.00009963393,0.00052194484,8.0408734e-7,7.7598224e-7,0.000008700087,0.0001752379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871457,0.00019179565,0.00031017722,0.00009297315,0.00047830155,0.00021220064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994718,0.000066378416,0.00024022844,0.00008763579,0.00008995343,0.0000440214],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058800884,0.00010231466,0.00018780498,0.000008259887,0.0014021851,0.00022387311,0.00035304148,0.00017404452,0.00022280235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020518532,0.000053689164,0.00018262606,0.00020308154,0.0016641084,0.00022256895,0.000091248185,0.00040163047,3.0332336e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029394776,0.000006123504,0.00014765238,0.000114164875,0.00014085576,0.0000026976397,0.10339853,0.000013373156,0.0026340124,0.86415666,0.028583998,0.0007725164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040494898,0.000063564206,0.0026692217,0.00027983673,0.00016324192,0.00009058996,0.15228264,0.000015624219,0.002069139,0.23799331,0.6037524,0.00021550304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015119216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029240342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62616336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009160775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019053179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407986110","doi":"10.1017/glj.2024.72","title":"The Travel Visa as the Ubiquitous Legal Infrastructure of Everyday Global Mobility Arbitrariness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Business; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009434755277545372,"score_gpt":0.30961391186276965,"score_spread":0.30017915658522426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407986110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7772182,0.0010743998,0.00008530078,0.016684938,0.0040881434,0.00018614922,0.000020354633,0.00005108008,0.20059139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678373,0.00020908866,0.000043199387,0.00039452076,0.00093643094,0.0000057286547,0.0000015207299,0.00000893555,0.0016168706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981522,0.0003216593,0.00040297097,0.00018005424,0.0005505241,0.00039257275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911153,0.00032628677,0.00014328043,0.00018172832,0.00009854607,0.00013865007],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002071109,0.00014173091,0.00017140037,0.000019304736,0.001802563,0.00059508084,0.0007698996,0.0001097226,0.00028567985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007162975,0.00008042551,0.0002050721,0.00024242199,0.0011109557,0.0003738425,0.00007953057,0.0005011369,0.00003986134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042902662,0.000025138512,0.0011109726,0.000012353723,0.00018016866,0.000047293437,0.00960688,0.000041080435,0.000022507005,0.94794965,0.016509006,0.024452075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017232212,0.000024318466,0.08330114,0.00003564915,0.000034578585,0.00027934945,0.004974716,0.000038268026,0.000037947782,0.13281296,0.7781278,0.00016095511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024533293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002750523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8151367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045133955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081795047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413882454","doi":"10.1017/glj.2025.11","title":"Uncertainty and Tension in Constitutional Adjudication of Climate Mitigation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.008026956786072606,"score_gpt":0.31259269283025976,"score_spread":0.30456573604418713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413882454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84425825,0.0002565534,0.00009399557,0.0026508716,0.0001273013,0.000073996816,0.000007509635,0.0000053555923,0.15252614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987823,0.0007152197,0.00010403733,0.00029550376,0.00004904409,9.2012493e-7,0.0000036655272,7.3348804e-7,0.000048576192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995361,0.000076827724,0.00013762282,0.00004755765,0.00010762335,0.000094268245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998209,0.000035539848,0.00006235998,0.000028638737,0.000017251845,0.0000353258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036402413,0.000028672961,0.000055934117,0.00004070759,0.00032950417,0.000015469874,0.000037918726,0.000036502228,0.00004853453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019184872,0.000027223668,0.000016108088,0.000068615715,0.0006607666,0.00011545315,0.00001403159,0.00007596021,0.0000031603038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007396365,0.000015339745,0.015142512,0.0000051198417,0.0000026308708,0.0000011583643,0.0005349927,0.000030023268,0.0006171226,0.9808823,0.00009052362,0.0026708685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018536982,0.000061693565,0.48925364,0.0005376491,0.000044195698,0.000039673923,0.002267321,0.00030052694,0.00100799,0.21059822,0.29379097,0.00024443475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010031192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016193936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7702841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006281722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005167314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2534313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W54941906","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200013468","title":"If Derrida Had Played Football","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Consolation; HERO; Favourite; Dream; Aside; Legend; Football; Philosophy; Literature; Aesthetics; Art; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.04608607682706463,"score_gpt":0.27839875440489725,"score_spread":0.23231267757783264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W54941906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06872682,0.0007529347,0.00006105432,0.011485124,0.0030066858,0.00009012566,0.000037566242,0.00011479462,0.9157249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755773,0.00005124733,0.00011764098,0.0045271055,0.014658423,0.0000023062726,0.000008690449,0.000027006703,0.0050302627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987597,0.00005884131,0.0003507519,0.00014634446,0.0003150522,0.00036931873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993155,0.000030586805,0.00014393752,0.00018031072,0.00014000823,0.00018965645],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002919293,0.00016389255,0.00019250059,0.000065177854,0.0012903793,0.0005317308,0.00027021323,0.000073650845,0.0033240516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008745162,0.00014046644,0.00018562564,0.000013337018,0.00031162056,0.000490686,0.000042261978,0.0005874947,0.0008146247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027936703,0.00006877175,0.000005868226,0.000010917234,0.000077954006,0.000053035397,0.024165828,0.00001339128,0.000058619247,0.9392824,0.03440653,0.0018287029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049857947,0.00005562675,0.000026282381,0.000028892158,0.000035628964,0.00017757177,0.0004459503,0.000054176897,0.00008932269,0.075488254,0.9228999,0.00019980977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026687913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029159116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91069466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052577605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003429725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72642296","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200005083","title":"Third Party Liability for Hezbollah Attacks against Israel","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Missile; Ancient history; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01790723914665802,"score_gpt":0.32730697790077173,"score_spread":0.3093997387541137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72642296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5556121,0.000049717164,0.00030108858,0.001674136,0.00092373375,0.00017490359,0.000023677143,0.00004525327,0.4411954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97972935,0.0000064659002,0.0004002295,0.0007481132,0.0035973848,0.000008101184,0.0000126065825,0.000009756825,0.015487994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861914,0.00010992256,0.00030970504,0.00015424001,0.00043141964,0.0003755492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920064,0.0001079229,0.00014968097,0.00010706788,0.0003081418,0.00012653705],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009512873,0.00010166345,0.00014306814,0.00003361908,0.002262681,0.0002793846,0.0002928973,0.00009029224,0.00025224406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025019417,0.00008299293,0.00019391307,0.000032157543,0.0002976963,0.00032794953,0.000017822631,0.00019808886,0.00009150507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017003478,0.000058848153,0.00031035324,0.000003961659,0.000012278753,0.000007944391,0.00050191284,0.000014376616,0.00003774346,0.9842999,0.014556704,0.00017900493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002801549,0.00002025261,0.0012860643,0.000011011991,0.000008524644,0.000005493545,0.000060779443,0.000025304527,0.000107365406,0.37097594,0.6271139,0.000105199324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016112609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014171937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6133239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016125175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011146699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W83106703","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200006350","title":"Free Movement v. Social Rights in an Enlarged Union - the<i>Laval</i>and<i>Viking</i>Cases before the ECJ","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latvian; Free movement; Directive; Law; Labour law; Industrial action; Political science; Liability; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.02450347577759618,"score_gpt":0.30788623077840743,"score_spread":0.2833827550008112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W83106703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9589849,0.00008632211,0.000013478959,0.0124584725,0.0005092008,0.00014276634,0.000020314716,0.000023041912,0.027761506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957041,0.000058220165,0.000018663204,0.0023149732,0.0013396285,0.0000066155644,0.0000053067583,0.000007203778,0.0005452453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982185,0.00044417984,0.00024164232,0.00012324638,0.00064211566,0.00033030956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949336,0.00006653457,0.00012051526,0.00012159077,0.000110390305,0.00008762139],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001141591,0.00010642623,0.000108979446,0.000039509174,0.004465961,0.00017353182,0.0005044653,0.00006260006,0.00016274722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023519824,0.0000621689,0.000070750844,0.00012016179,0.00051718793,0.0004154163,0.00006409239,0.00033352815,0.0000058818887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017683711,0.000070344875,0.0036576674,0.000001002941,0.0000194893,0.000088454784,0.026911376,0.000004614848,0.00003533154,0.9653735,0.0034686618,0.0003518285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009256187,0.00013761614,0.06007115,0.000027811817,0.000023484296,0.00013089932,0.0018682425,0.000028698638,0.00016629603,0.16734879,0.76907134,0.0002000651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01961743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21594234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7980248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011023928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006352869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9048260","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200005939","title":"Sexual Abuse of Children Abroad – A German Perspective on the Antalya Case","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"German legal, social, and political studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; German; Law; Perspective (graphical); Criticism; Criminology; Turkish; Political science; Girl; History; Sociology; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.019945892259352314,"score_gpt":0.3627356984492208,"score_spread":0.3427898061898685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9048260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.784819,0.00022777813,0.00001166074,0.0014800663,0.00026871363,0.0001594091,0.000019246907,0.000026370433,0.21298775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964391,0.00006708569,0.00002026087,0.00097408233,0.0019148249,0.0000021023689,9.3231534e-7,0.0000145338445,0.0005670789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784267,0.0003021668,0.00035567686,0.00018061885,0.00061676605,0.0007021247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864644,0.00041809893,0.00020832616,0.00017261258,0.00026829122,0.00028621772],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016789002,0.00017190598,0.0002507711,0.000066090746,0.0030389077,0.000120910074,0.00032376993,0.000114155526,0.00025857892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113566224,0.00012107133,0.0001772168,0.00022196643,0.00128623,0.00018104607,0.00003944675,0.00057593535,0.00008012581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033929293,0.00015918522,0.0011159627,0.0000031117502,0.00014834097,0.00039545188,0.15694125,6.875847e-7,0.000027083599,0.83638674,0.0044375947,0.0003506451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035665776,0.0011473037,0.10597006,0.00019178854,0.00060327194,0.0073319464,0.5925365,0.000008238042,0.0015783176,0.09706923,0.18806402,0.0019326987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017954383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0131989755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73931754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027384458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081802435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}